alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 156.460 Reduction of enrollee's share of premium to account for advance payments of the premium tax credit. ( a ) *Reduction of enrollee's share of premium to account for advance payments of the premium tax credit.* A QHP issuer that receives notice from the Exchange that an individual enrolled in the issuer's QHP is eligible for an advance payment of the premium tax credit must— ( 1 ) Reduce the portion of the premium charged to or for the individual for the applicable month(s) by the amount of the advance payment of the premium tax credit;
( 2 ) Notify the Exchange of the reduction in the portion of the premium charged to the individual in accordance with § 156.265(g); and
( 3 ) Include with each billing statement, as applicable, to or for the individual the amount of the advance payment of the premium tax credit for the applicable month(s), and the remaining premium owed.
( b ) *Delays in payment.* A QHP issuer may not refuse to commence coverage under a policy or terminate coverage on account of any delay in payment of an advance payment of the premium tax credit on behalf of an enrollee if the QHP issuer has been notified by the Exchange under § 155.340(a) of this subchapter that the QHP issuer will receive such advance payment.
( c ) *Refunds to enrollees for improper reduction of enrollee's share of premium to account for advance payments of the premium tax credit.* If a QHP issuer discovers that it did not reduce the portion of the premium charged to or for an enrollee for the applicable month(s) by the amount of the advance payment of the premium tax credit in accordance with paragraph (a)(1) of this section, the QHP issuer must notify the enrollee of the improper reduction within 45 calendar days of the QHP issuer's discovery of the improper reduction and refund any excess premium paid by or for the enrollee, as follows: ( 1 ) Unless a refund is requested by or for the enrollee, the QHP issuer must, within 45 calendar days of discovery of the error, apply the excess premium paid by or for the enrollee to the enrollee's portion of the premium (or refund the amount directly). If any excess premium remains, the QHP issuer must apply the excess premium to the enrollee's portion of the premium for each subsequent month for the remainder of the period of enrollment or benefit year until the excess is fully applied (or refund the remaining amount directly). If any excess premium remains at the end of the period of enrollment or benefit year, the QHP issuer must refund any excess premium within 45 calendar days of the end of the period of enrollment or benefit year, whichever comes first.
( 2 ) If a refund is requested by or for the enrollee, the refund must be provided within 45 calendar days of the date of the request.
[78 FR 15535, Mar. 11, 2013, as amended at 78 FR 65100, Oct. 30, 2013]
Exhibit 16

Managements Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

The management of CSR plc is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as
such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for CSR plc. Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, we conducted an
evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based principally on the framework and criteria established in Internal Control  Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission as at 31 December 2010 (the end of the current fiscal year). Based on that evaluation, our management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as at 31 December 2010 at providing
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

Deloitte LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has audited the consolidated financial statements included in this
annual report on Form 20-F and, as part of the audit, has issued a report, included herein, on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting.

Date: 15 March 2011

/s/ Joep van Beurden

---

|Name: | Joep van Beurden
|----- | ----------------

|Title: | Chief Executive Officer
|------ | -----------------------

/s/ Will Gardiner

---

|Name: | Will Gardiner
|----- | -------------

|Title: | Chief Financial Officer
|------ | -----------------------



---



CSR plc Annual Report
and Financial Statements 2010
#### Lawrence Bastable, Respondent, *v.*William J. Carroll, Appellant.

*Bastable*v. *Carroll,*128 App. Div. 901, appeal dismissed.

(Submitted February 9, 1909;

decided February 23, 1909.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered October 21, 1908, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying a motion to vacate a stipulation in settlement of an action to restrain the defendant from designating himself as the successor of a certain firm. It was alleged that the stipulation was entered into on the part of defendant’s attorney without authority.

*Robert O'Byrne*for appellant.

*Robert W. Crawford*for respondent.

Appeal dismissed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., Haight, Yann, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock and Chase, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report of GateHouse Media, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                             
|-----------------------------
|/s/ Michael E. Reed          
|Michael E. Reed              
|Chief Executive Officer      
|(Principal Executive Officer)
|March 12, 2007
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-00086 

Conference Calendar

 

IN RE: MICHAEL ALLEN KENNEDY,

Movant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Motion to Reduce Sanctions

- - - - - - - - - -

April 9, 1998

Before JOLLY, JONES, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Michael Allen Kennedy, # 433834, has filed a miscellaneous

motion, unconnected with any district court proceedings, asking

this court to reduce his sanctions. He asserts that because he

has been unable to pay the sanctions over the past five years, it

is obvious that he will never be able to pay and will be forever

barred from filing any pleadings in the courts. He does not seek

to file any particular pleadings either in the district court or

in this court. He swears once again that he has learned his

lesson regarding his propensity to file frivolous litigation.

In 1995, Kennedy satisfied a $100 fine imposed in Kennedy v.

Little, No. 93-8221 (5th Cir. Sept. 22, 1993). Thus, he has
No. 98-00086

-2-

demonstrated some ability to pay his sanctions. The last time he

swore that he had learned his lesson, he had submitted false

documents to the district court. Further, his request is

premature because he does not seek to file any specific pleadings

at this time. Kennedy’s motion to reduce sanctions is DENIED.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the annual report of R&R Acquisition VI, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending June 30, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Arnold P. Kling, President
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
  and




(2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.





Dated:
September 23, 2010





/s/ Arnold P. KlingArnold
      P. KlingPresident(Principal
      Executive Officer)





A signed
original of this certification has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
Re: MATS 

 RobertJ Wayland 

 to: Higgins, Cortney 

 11/16/2012 12:01 PM 

 Cc: Bill Maxwell, Karen Thundiyil 

Cortney - 

Thanks for the quick reply. "Yes", the attached file is the latest/final 

version of the preamble/regulatory text. Karen - can you get this loaded 

into ROCIS for Cortney so that they can conclude review on the package? 

thanx! 

bob 

Robert J. Wayland, Ph.D. 

Leader, Energy Strategies Group 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards 

Sector Policies and Programs Division 

Mail Code D243-01 

RTP, NC 27711 

 

Phone: (919) 541-1045 

Cell: (919) 306-2290 

Fax: (919) 541-5450 

e-mail: wayland.robertj@epa.gov 

********************************************************* 

DRAFT/Deliberative Document -- FOIA Exempt 

********************************************************* 

From: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov> 

To: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

Cc: Bill Maxwell/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Karen Thundiyil/DC/USEPA/US@EPA 

Date: 11/16/2012 11:58 AM 

Subject: MATS 

Hi Bob, 

We have no further comments. Is the attached version the final one (this 

is from the 10:28 am email)? If so, can you have OP upload it into 

ROCIS? 

 

Thanks, 

Cortney 

 

 [attachment 

"EO12866_MATS_Reconsideration_2060-AR62_Proposal_20121116.pdf.pdf" 

deleted 

by RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US]
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 38 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 238
118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 38

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
   United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Federal Highway 
  Administration relating to ``Waiver of Buy America Requirements for 
                      Electric Vehicle Chargers''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 26, 2023

Mr. Rubio (for himself, Mr. Scott of Florida, Mr. Marshall, Mr. Cramer, 
  Mr. Hawley, Mr. Tillis, and Mr. Ricketts) introduced the following 
joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                      Environment and Public Works

                            November 7, 2023

  Committee discharged, by petition, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 802(c), and 
                         placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
   United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Federal Highway 
  Administration relating to ``Waiver of Buy America Requirements for 
                      Electric Vehicle Chargers''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Federal Highway Administration relating to 
``Waiver of Buy America Requirements for Electric Vehicle Chargers'' 
(88 Fed. Reg. 10619 (February 21, 2023)), and such rule shall have no 
force or effect.

                                                       Calendar No. 238

118th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                             S. J. RES. 38

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
   United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Federal Highway 
  Administration relating to ``Waiver of Buy America Requirements for 
                      Electric Vehicle Chargers''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            November 7, 2023

  Committee discharged, by petition, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 802(c), and 
                         placed on the calendar
```
§ 1355.41 Scope of the Adoption and Foster Care Analysis and Reporting System. ( a ) This section applies to state and tribal title IV-E agencies unless indicated for state title IV-E agencies only.
( b ) An agency described in paragraph (a) of this section must report information on the characteristics and experiences of a child in the reporting populations described in § 1355.42. The title IV-E agency must submit the information collected to ACF on a semi-annual basis in an out-of-home care data file and adoption assistance data file as required in § 1355.43, pertaining to information described in §§ 1355.44 and 1355.45 and in a format according to ACF's specifications.
[81 FR 90569, Dec. 14, 2016, as amended at 85 FR 28424, May 12, 2020]
Exhibit 23.1
  CONSENT  OF  INDEPENDENT  REGISTERED  PUBLIC  ACCOUNTING  FIRM
  We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in its Registration Statement ( Form S-8 Nos. 333-147149 and 333-168800, and Form S-3 No. 333-180290) of Remark Media, Inc. of our report dated March 31, 2014 related to the consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, and for the years then ended, included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A.
   /s/ Cherry Bekaert LLP
 Atlanta, GA
 April 4, 2014
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 223 (Monday, November 20, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 67127]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9266]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK OF THE UNITED STATES


Notice of Open Special Meeting of the Advisory Committee of the 
Export-Import Bank of the United States (Ex-Im Bank)

SUMMARY: The Advisory Committee was established by Pub. L. 98-181, 
November 30, 1983, to advise the Export-Import Bank on its programs and 
to provide comments for inclusion in the reports of the Export-Import 
Bank of the United States to Congress.
    Time and Place: Tuesday, December 5, 2006, from 9:30 a.m. to 12 
p.m. The meeting will be held at Ex-Im Bank in the Main Conference Room 
1143, 811 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20571.
    Agenda: Agenda items include a briefing of the Advisory Committee 
members on challenges for 2007, their roles and responsibilities and an 
ethics briefing.
    Public Participation: The meeting will be open to public 
participation, and the last 10 minutes will be set aside for oral 
questions or comments. Members of the public may also file written 
statement(s) before or after the meeting. If you plan to attend, a 
photo ID must be presented at the guard's desk as part of the clearance 
process into the building, and you may contact Teri Stumpf to be placed 
on an attendee list. If any person wishes auxiliary aids (such as a 
sign language interpreter) of other special accommodations, please 
contact, prior to November 29, 2006 Teri Stumpf, Room 1209, 811 Vermont 
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20571, Voice: (202) 565-3502 or TDD (202) 
565-3377.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Teri Stumpf, Room 1209, 811 Vermont 
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20571, (202) 565-3502.

Howard A. Schweitzer,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 06-9266 Filed 11-17-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6690-01-M
§ 1328.7 Five-year plan and annual report. ( a ) As required by section 154(a)(2) of the DD Act of 2000 (42 U.S.C. 15064), the application for core funding for a UCEDD shall describe a five-year plan, including a projected goal or goals related to one or more areas of emphasis for each of the core functions in section 153(a)(2) of the DD Act of 2000 (42 U.S.C.15063). ( 1 ) For each area of emphasis under which a goal has been identified, the UCEDD must state in its application the measures of progress with the requirements of the law and applicable regulation, in accordance with current practice.
( 2 ) If changes are made to the measures of progress established for a year, the five-year plan must be amended to reflect those changes and approved by AIDD upon review.
( 3 ) By July 30 of each year, a UCEDD shall submit an Annual Report, using the system established or funded by AIDD. In order to be accepted by AIDD, an Annual Report must meet the requirements of section 154(e) of the Act (42 U.S.C. 15064) and, the applicable regulations, and include the information necessary for the Secretary, or his or her designee, to comply with section 105(1), (2), and (3) of the Act (42 U.S.C. 15005) and any other information requested by AIDD. The Report shall include information on progress made in achieving the UCEDD's goals for the previous year, including: ( i ) The extent to which the goals were achieved;
( ii ) A description of the strategies that contributed to achieving the goals;
( iii ) The extent to which the goals were not achieved;
( iv ) A detailed description of why goals were not met; and
( v ) An accounting of the manner in which funds paid to the UCEDD for a fiscal year were expended.
( 4 ) The Report also must include information on proposed revisions to the goals and a description of successful efforts to leverage funds, other than funds under the Act, to pursue goals consistent with the UCEDD program.
( 5 ) Each UCEDD must include in its Annual Report information on its achievement of the measures of progress.
( b ) [Reserved]
Exhibit 32.2





Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the quarterly report of MetroCorp Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David C. Choi, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2002, that:





1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and operating results of the Company.






Date: May 11, 2011
By:
/s/ David C. ChoiDavid C. ChoiChief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6533

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ROBERT RUHE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern

District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, Chief

District Judge. (CR-96-3, CA-00-188-1)

Submitted: August 15, 2002 Decided: August 20, 2002

Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Farnan Potts, Toledo, Ohio, for Appellant. Zelda Elizabeth

Wesley, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Clarksburg, West

Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Robert Ruhe seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). We have reviewed

the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the

recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and

dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See

United States v. Ruhe, Nos. CR-96-3; CA-00-188-1 (N.D.W. Va. Feb.

28, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Graham R. Hughes, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Phage Genomics, Inc.;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; and

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report.

4.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15) for the registrant and we have:

a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c)  presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a)  all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Dated this 14th day of May, 2004.



| | /s/ Graham R. Hughes 
Graham R. Hughes 
Principal Financial Officer
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------
§ 2105.7 Can you ask for records to be disclosed in a particular form or format? ( a ) Generally, you may choose the form or format of disclosure for records requested. The Agency must provide the records in the requested form or format if the Agency can readily reproduce the record in that form or format.
( b ) The Agency may charge you the direct costs involved in converting records to the requested format if the Agency does not normally maintain the records in that format (*see* § 2105.42).