alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Rockingham,

No. 5135.

#### Marie L. Goulet *v.*William Goulet.

Argued June 4, 1963.

Decided July 9, 1963.

*Fisher, Parsons, Moran & Temple {Mr. Robert H. Temple*orally), for the plaintiff.

*Burns, Bryant & Hinchey*and *Joseph P. Nadeau {Mr. Nadeau*orally), for the defendant.

*52Blandin, J.

The first issue before us is whether the effect of the covenant not to sue the defendant, which was signed by the plaintiff, is governed by the laws of Maine or New Hampshire. The material portions of the instrument read as follows: “In consideration of the payment of one dollar ($1.00) receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the undersigned hereby expressly covenants and agrees not to [sue] or to proceed after the date of the execution hereof with any suit or proceeding of any kind against William Goulet, either severally or jointly with any other person, on account of injuries claimed to have been sustained by me on March 21, 1954 at Raymond, N. H. and that undersigned will execute a full release of all claims and demands against my husband Wm. Goulet growing out of said alleged accident on demand.

Dated April 2, 1954.

Marie L. Goulet(Seal)”

While the accident from which these proceedings arose happened in New Hampshire, the covenant was signed in Maine by a party domiciled there. As we interpret its terms they are inclusive to the end that the plaintiff wife agreed not to sue her defendant husband on account of the accident anywhere or at any time. In these circumstances and in the absence of any reasonably clear indication of the parties’ intention that the laws of any other jurisdiction should control, we believe that the validity and effect of the instrument is to be governed by the law of the place where it was signed and where both parties were domiciled. *Hinchey*v. *Surety Company,*99 N. H. 373, 377; Restatement, Conflict of Laws, *ss.*332, 335. We therefore hold that the law of tire state of Maine is controlling.

The defendant bases his defense on the sole proposition that the plaintiff “for consideration” executed this covenant not to sue him and further agreed to sign a full release of all claims and demands against him. Although the Court found that no consideration was given for the covenant not to sue, yet under the law of Maine a seal implies a consideration and the want of it cannot be averred against an instrument under seal. *Tucker*v. *Smith,*4 Me. 415, 419; *Wing*v. *Chase,*35 Me. 260; see *Shaw*v. *Philbrick,*129 Me. 259. The case of *Goodwin*v. *Amusement Company,*129 Maine 36, also states that neither the absence nor the failure of consideration avails to overcome the binding legal effect of a seal. *Id.,*42. No Maine cases have been called to our attention which indicate any departure *53from this established rule.

What we have said renders unnecessary consideration of other issues and the order is

*Exception sustained.*

All concurred.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6231

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

GERALDO ORE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District

Judge. (CR-97-449, CA-99-629-AM)

Submitted: May 11, 2000 Decided: May 18, 2000

Before MURNAGHAN, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Geraldo Ore, Appellant Pro Se. Lisa Ellen Perkins, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Vincent J. Falvo, Jr., OFFICE OF THE

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Geraldo Ore seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 1999). We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. See United States v. Ore, Nos. CR-97-449; CA-99-629-AM

(E.D. Va. Jan. 7, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Robert P. Appleby, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of Tasker Capital
Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

      (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

      (b) [Intentionally omitted in accordance with SEC Release No. 33-8392]

      (c) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      (d) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

      (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

      (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

August 22, 2005


/s/ Robert P. Appleby
---------------------
Robert P. Appleby
Chief Executive Officer
lANCE R. LEFLEUR DIRECTOR 

# ADE

Alabama Department of Environmental Management adem.alabama.gov 1400Coliseum Blvd. 36110-2400 • Post Office Box301463 Montgomery, Alabama 36130-1463 (334) 271-7700 • FAX (334) 271-7950 February 28, 2012

Ms. Gwendolyn Keyes Fleming Regional Administrator, EPA Region 4 AtlantaFederal Center 61 Forsyth Street, S.W. Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960 DearMs Fleming: RoBERTJ. BENTLEY GovERNOR

On December 8, 2011, after considering Alabama's March 12, 2009 and October 11, 2011 ozone designation recommendations, 2008-2010 air quality data and other relevant technical information, EPA issued a letter stating its intent to designate the entire State of Alabama as unclassifiable/attainment for the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS. This letter is in response to EPA'sDecember 8, 2011 letter. The process for designating areas following promulgation ofanew or revisedNAAQS is contained in Clean Air Act (CAA) section 107 (d)(l)(A)(i), (ii), and (iii) (42 U.S.C. 7407). This section of the CAA identifies three potential classifications: nonattainment, attainment and unclassifiable. Given that the designation ofunclassifiable/attainment is not includedin the CAA as a potential classification, ADEM recommends that the entire State ofAlabama be designated as attainment. We believe this classification is consistent with the intent ofthe CAA, as all monitors in the State, including our most populous areas, indicate attainment ofthe 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS. Ifyou have any questions, please contactADEM Air Division ChiefRonald Gore at 334- 271-7868 orby e-mail at rwg@adem.state.al.us.

LRLIRWG/ghe

cc: BeverlyBanister, EPA Region4

Birmingham Branch 110Vulcan Road Birmingham, AL 35209-4702 (205) 942-6168 (205) 941-1603 (FAX) Decatur Branch 2715 Sandlin Road, S. W. Decatur, AL 35603-1333 (256) 353-1713 (256) 340-9359 (FAX) Sincerely,

# «I?~

\. Lance R. LeFleur Director

I I MobileBranch 2204 Perimeter Road Mobile, AL 36615-1131 (251) 450-3400 (251) 479·2593 (FAX) Mobile-Coastal 4171Commanders Drive Mobile, AL 36615-1421 (251) 432-6533 (251) 432-6598 (FAX)
Contact Us

#   Environmental Management Systems

          -                  Environmental Management Systems      
An EMS offers a collaborative and systematic approach that organizations can use to reduce the environmental impacts of their operations.
 

An EMS is a set of processes and practices that enable an organization to reduce its environmental impacts and increase its operating efficiency. This site provides information and resources related to establishing an EMS for small businesses, private industry, and local, state and federal agencies. The EPA continues to maintain an EMS at all of its offices and laboratories, focusing on the reduction of the agency's environmental footprint.

            -  Basics of an EMS
An EMS helps an organization address its regulatory requirements in a systematic and cost-effective manner.
Learn more about the Basics of an EMS 
            -  Develop an EMS
Planning and developing an EMS is a multi-step process involving the Plan-Do-Check-Act cycle.
Learn more about Developing an EMS 
            -  EMS at EPA Facilities
The EPA integrated EMSs at all of its major offices and laboratories before the mandated deadline of December 31, 2005.
Learn more about EMS at EPA Facilities 

Contact Us
EXHIBIT 32.2
                                                                    ------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


            In connection with the Quarterly Report of Salon Media Group, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Elizabeth Hambrecht, President, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and
Treasurer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or
          78o(d)); and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                              /s/ Elizabeth Hambrecht
                                              --------------------------------
November 13, 2003                             Elizabeth Hambrecht
                                              President, Chief Financial Officer
                                              Secretary and Treasurer
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 213 (Friday, November 3, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 64730]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9031]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Center for 
Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel, November 2, 2006, 8:30 a.m. 
to November 3, 2006, 5 p.m., Jurys Washington Hotel, 1500 New Hampshire 
Ave., NW., Washington, DC, 20036 which was published in the Federal 
Register on October 16, 2006, 71 FR 60744-60746.
    The meeting will be held one day only November 2, 2006. The meeting 
time and location remain the same. The meeting is closed to the public.

    Dated: October 27, 2006.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 06-9031 Filed 11-2-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
IIA 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. J. RES. 103 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United 

States Code, of the rule submitted by the Federal Communications Commission relating to ‘‘Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet; Restoring Internet Freedom’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 23, 2024 

Mrs. BLACKBURN (for herself and Mr. CRUZ) introduced the following joint 

resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by 

the Federal Communications Commission relating to 

‘‘Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet; Restoring Internet Freedom’’. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the Fed4 eral Communications Commission relating to ‘‘Safe5 guarding and Securing the Open Internet; Restoring 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•SJ 103 IS 

1 Internet Freedom’’ (89 Fed. Reg. 45404 (May 22, 2024)), 

2 and such rule shall have no force or effect. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

IntheMatterof ) 

) LRA946 

Request for Consideration of a Legal ) 

Question - Oakland County Democratic ) 

Party ) 

CERTIFICATION 

I, Shelley E. Garr, recording secretary for the Federal Election Commission executive 

session on June 10,2014, do hereby certiiy that the Commission decided a vote of 6-0, on an 

amended pre-meeting tally, to conclude that OCDP's bingo nights did not constitute three 

separate lundiaising events, and, instead, OCDP was required to itemize all contributions 

exceeding SSO received fiom contributors during each bingo night under the provisions 

addressing the recordkeeping requirements at 2 U.S.C. § 432(c)(l)-(2); 11 C.F.R. § 102.9(a). 

Commissioners Goodman, Hunter, Petersen, Ravel, Walther, and Weintraub voted 

afSimatively for the decision. 

Attest: 

Date Shelley E. G^J 

Acting Secretary and Clerk of the Commission
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 208 (Friday, October 27, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 62991]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-8929]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Notice of New Fee; Federal Lands Recreation Enhancement Act 
(Title VIII, Pub. L. 108-447)

AGENCY: National Forests in Florida, Ocala National Forest. USDA Forest 
Service.

ACTION: Notice of New Fee Site.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The USDA Forest Service proposes a new fee site that will 
involve a special recreation permit for each operator using the Ocala 
National Forest designated off-highway vehicle trail system. There 
would be a choice between a three-consecutive day permits ($15) or an 
annual permit (proposed to be between $60 and up to $120 pending final 
financial and marketing analysis, public input, and agency review). The 
Forest Service will use funds generated to sustain the trail system, 
facilities, patrols, and monitoring.
    The Ocala National Forest is committed to providing quality 
motorized recreation in balance with what the land can support. The 
Ocala National Forest recently designated approximately 150 miles of 
off-highway vehicle trails for motorcycles and unlicensed all-terrain 
vehicles that consist of mixed-use roads, ATV/motorcycle trails, and 
motorcycle-only trails. Analysis has begun to consider additional 
designated trails on the Ocala National Forest which would be included 
in the fee permit system.

DATES: The proposed fee would be initiated no sooner than April 1, 
2007. Comments, concerns, or questions on this proposal must be 
submitted by October 30, 2006.

ADDRESSES: Submit comments, concerns, or questions about this proposal 
to District Ranger, Ocala National Forest, 40929 State Road 19, 
Umatilla, Florida 3448-5849.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Contact Bret Bush, Recreation Program 
Manager, 352-625-2520 extension 2509.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Recreation Lands Enhancement Act 
(Title VIII, Pub. L. 108-447) directed the Secretary of Agriculture to 
publish a six-month advance notice in the Federal Register whenever new 
recreation fee areas are established. The Recreation Resource Advisory 
Committee will review proposals for new fees at least three months 
prior to the recommended initiation date.

    Dated: October 3, 2006.
John Richard Lint,
District Ranger, Ocala National Forest.
[FR Doc. 06-8929 Filed 10-26-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
#### § 1150.25 Will the collection of a claim by salary offset act as a waiver of my rights to dispute the claimed debt?

Your involuntary payment of all or any portion of a debt under this subpart will not be construed as a waiver of any rights that you may have under 5 U.S.C. 5514 or other provisions of a law or written contract, unless there are statutory or contractual provisions to the contrary.
§ 1355.58 Failure to meet the conditions of the approved APD. ( a ) In accordance with 45 CFR 75.371 through 75.375 and 45 CFR 95.635, ACF may suspend title IV-B and title IV-E funding approved in the APD for a CCWIS if ACF determines that the title IV-E agency fails to comply with APD requirements in 45 CFR part 95, subpart F, or meet the requirements at § 1355.52 or, if applicable, § 1355.53, § 1355.54, or § 1355.56.
( b ) Suspension of CCWIS funding begins on the date that ACF determines the title IV-E agency failed to: ( 1 ) Comply with APD requirements in 45 CFR part 95, subpart F; or
( 2 ) Meet the requirements at § 1355.52 or, if applicable, § 1355.53, § 1355.54, or § 1355.56 and has not corrected the failed requirements according to the time frame in the approved APD.
( c ) The suspension will remain in effect until the date that ACF: ( 1 ) Determines that the title IV-E agency complies with 45 CFR part 95, subpart F; or
( 2 ) Approves a plan to change the application to meet the requirements at § 1355.52 and, if applicable, § 1355.53, § 1355.54, or § 1355.56.
( d ) If ACF suspends an APD, or the title IV-E agency voluntarily ceases the design, development, installation, operation, or maintenance of an approved CCWIS, ACF may recoup all title IV-E funds claimed for the CCWIS project.
[81 FR 35482, June 2, 2016]
You have reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. (Historical purposes)

 

- Voting Rights Act : evidence of continued need :  hearing before 	the Subcommittee on the Constitution of the Committee on the Judiciary, 	House of Representatives, One Hundred Ninth Congress, second session, March 	8, 2006.   Volume 4 	(Complete Document 89.2mb)

***Segmented for faster downloading:***

- Voting Rights Act : evidence of continued need : hearing before the 	Subcommittee on the Constitution of the Committee on the Judiciary, House of 	Representatives, One Hundred Ninth Congress, second session, March 8, 2006.  	Volume 4	 (Pages 	1-300)
- Voting Rights Act : evidence of continued need : hearing before the 	Subcommittee on the Constitution of the Committee on the Judiciary, House of 	Representatives, One Hundred Ninth Congress, second session, March 8, 2006.  	Volume 4	 	(Pages 301-600)
- Voting Rights Act : evidence of continued need : hearing before the 	Subcommittee on the Constitution of the Committee on the Judiciary, House of 	Representatives, One Hundred Ninth Congress, second session, March 8, 2006.  	Volume 4	 	(Pages 601-900)
- Voting Rights Act : evidence of continued need : hearing before the 	Subcommittee on the Constitution of the Committee on the Judiciary, House of 	Representatives, One Hundred Ninth Congress, second session, March 8, 2006.  	Volume 4	 	(Pages 901-1200)
- Voting Rights Act : evidence of continued need : hearing before the 	Subcommittee on the Constitution of the Committee on the Judiciary, House of 	Representatives, One Hundred Ninth Congress, second session, March 8, 2006.  	Volume 4 	 	(Pages 1201-1423)
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the quarterly report of MetroCorp Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q
for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, David C. Choi, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley act of
2002, that:  1.
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
operating results of the Company. /s/ David C. ChoiDavid C. ChoiChief Financial Officer
# 1998 Executive Calendars

**

----

   The Executive Calendar is published by the Executive Clerk’s office in the Office of the Secretary of the Senate. The calendar is published each day the Senate is in session. These calendars list executive business items such as unanimous consent agreements, resolutions, treaties, and nominations. The calendar is identified by the date published and a volume number, which both appear on the cover of the calendar. A final calendar is published at the end of each session of Congress. For a detailed summary of the sections of the Executive Calendar, see, About the Executive Calendar.
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-14-0000983

27-MAY-2015

09:00 AM