alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AFS-15-1659-E

August 27, 2015

 Exemption No.12707

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-1633

Mr. David Jensen

Vice President, Aircraft Maintenance

Aviation Consultants, Inc.

945 Airport Drive

San Luis Obispo, CA 93401

Dear Mr. Jensen:

This letter is to inform you that we have denied your petition for exemption. It transmits our 

decision and explains its basis.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated April 27, 2015, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on

behalf of Aviation Consultants, Inc. (Aviation Consultants) for an exemption from § 135.152

of Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). This exemption, if granted, would allow 

Aviation Consultants to add and operate one Bombardier Challenger Cl-600-2B16 (Cl-604 

Variant) to its Operating Specification (OpSpecs) without complying with 14 CFR Part 135

Appendix F, which prohibits the filtering of flight data provided to the Digital Flight Data 

Recorder (DFDR).

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because this is not a precedent-setting petition, and any delay in acting 

on this petition would be detrimental to Aviation Consultants.

The FAA recently issued a denial of exemption in circumstances similar in all material 

respects to those presented in your petition. In Denial of Exemption No. 11057 (copy

enclosed), the FAA found that the petitioner purchased the subject airplane from a foreign 

entity and, upon inspection, discovered that the airplane did not comply with the flight 

recorder data filtering prohibition of 14 CFR § 135.156. Nonetheless, the petitioner made a 

business decision to acquire this airplane for revenue operations and sought to put the airplane 
2

AFS-15-1659-E

into revenue service under 14 CFR Part 135, placing the burden of noncompliance on the 

FAA and the U.S. public. In the denial, we stated that the condition of the airplane is the sole 

responsibility of the petitioner. 

Aviation Consultants has not presented any specific evidence to indicate that the regulations 

have a unique impact or has presented an unfair burden beyond the petitioner’s control. The 

regulations apply to the petitioner as they would to the new acquisition of any aircraft by any 

operator. A business decision to acquire a noncompliant airplane is not a basis for exemption 

from long-established requirements.

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that—

• they don’t differ materially from those presented by the petitioner in the enclosed denial

of exemption No. 11057;

• the reasons stated by the FAA for denying the enclosed exemption also apply to the 

situation you present; and

• a grant of exemption wouldn’t be in the public interest.

Our Decision

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. § 106(f), 40113, and 44701, which the FAA 

Administrator has delegated to me, I hereby deny the petition of Aviation Consultants, Inc. for 

an exemption from 14 CFR §135.152 and Part 135 Appendix F.

Sincerely,

/s/

John Barbagallo

Deputy Director, Flight Standards Service

Enclosure

Exemption No. 11057
#### Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company v. Mink.

(Decided April 28, 1918.)

Appeal from Whitley Circuit Court.

BENJAMIN D. WARFIELD and H. H. TYE for appellant.

SAWYER A. SMITH and J. B. SNYDER for appellee.

Opinion of the Court by

Chief Justice Settle

Overruling appellant’s motion to correct judgment.

. As the motion of appellant to correct the judgment of affirmance in this case by setting aside so much thereof as awards appellee damages on the amount of the judgment of the lower court superseded by it, raises the same question this day considered and decided, adversely to the appellant’s contention, in the case of Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company v. Noble Steele, By, etc., 180 Ky. 290, and the opinion therein must control the decision asked in this case, the appellant’s motion herein to correct the judgment must therefore be and is overruled.
§ 1641.13 Causes for suspension. The debarring official may suspend an IPA in accordance with the procedures set forth in this part upon adequate evidence that: ( a ) A cause for debarment under § 1641.7 may exist;
( b ) The IPA has been indicted for or convicted of any offense described in § 1641.7;
( c ) The IPA has been found subject to a civil judgment described in § 1641.7(e), whether the judgment is final or not.
( d ) The IPA has been suspended from contracting with a Federal agency or entity receiving Federal funds including when the IPA has stipulated to the suspension.
# AGENCY:

Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and Development, HUD.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This Notice identifies unutilized, underutilized, excess, and surplus Federal property reviewed by HUD for suitability for possible use to assist the homeless.

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

December 1, 2006.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kathy Ezzell, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Room 7262, 451 Seventh Street SW., Washington, DC 20410; telephone (202) 708-1234; TTY number for the hearing- and speech-impaired (202) 708-2565, (these telephone numbers are not toll-free), or call the toll-free Title V information line at 1-800-927-7588.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In accordance with the December 12, 1988 court order in                     *National Coalition for the Homeless*                     v.                     *Veterans Administration,*                     No. 88-2503-OG (D.D.C.), HUD publishes a Notice, on a weekly basis, identifying unutilized, underutilized, excess and surplus Federal buildings and real property that HUD has reviewed for suitability for use to assist the homeless. Today's Notice is for the purpose of announcing that no additional properties have been determined suitable or unsuitable this week.                

Dated: November 22, 2006.

Mark R. Johnston,

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Special Needs.

[FR Doc. 06-9433 Filed 11-30-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4210-67-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                   DEC-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                      JAN-02-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                        SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                                    5,980
<SECURITIES>                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            17,108
<ALLOWANCES>                                                946
<INVENTORY>                                              24,436
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         50,527
<PP&E>                                                   46,191
<DEPRECIATION>                                           13,493
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                          110,602
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    16,938
<BONDS>                                                 102,412
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                      1
<OTHER-SE>                                             (15,165)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                            110,602
<SALES>                                                  95,410
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         95,410
<CGS>                                                    66,969
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            66,969
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         19,140
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        8,315
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                             414
<INCOME-TAX>                                                871
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                       (457)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                              (457)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                   0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                 0


</TABLE>
#### § 72.10 General requirements.

Any eligible jurisdiction or discretionary applicant desiring to apply for a grant must develop, submit and have approved a local Action Program. The Action Program must be submitted to the appropriate National Park Service Regional Office where it will be evaluated and approved. This is a necessary requirement which must precede the awarding of any rehabilitation or innovation grant. Until January 1, 1981, this requirement may be satisfied with an approved Preliminary Action Program. The Preliminary Action Program must include a firm commitment by the local government to complete and adopt a full Action Program within one year of approval of the Preliminary Action Program. After January 1, 1981, no rehabilitation or innovation grant will be awarded without an approved Recovery Action Program on file with the appropriate Regional Office. Communities are required to submit four (4) copies of the Action Program. Regional Offices and their States are:

## Northeast Region

Federal Office Bldg. Room 9310, 600 Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19106.

Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, West Virginia, and the District of Columbia.

## Southeast Region

75 Spring Street, Atlanta, Georgia 30303.

Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, Puerto Rico, South Carolina, Tennessee, and the Virgin Islands.

## Lake Central Region

Federal Building, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48107.

Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio, and Wisconsin.

## Mid-Continent Region

Denver Federal Center, P.O. Box 25387, Denver, Colorado 80225.

Colorado, Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, and Wyoming.

## Pacific Southwest Region

450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California 94102.

American Samoa, Arizona, California, Guam, Hawaii, and Nevada.

## Northwest Region

Federal Building, 914 Second Avenue, Seattle, Washington 98174.

Idaho, Oregon and Washington.

## South Central Region

5000 Marble Avenue, N.E., Albuquerque, New Mexico 87110.

Arkansas, Louisiana, New Mexico, Oklahoma, and Texas.

## Alaska Area Office

1011 East Tudor, Suite 297, Anchorage, Alaska 99503.

(Sec. 1007(a) and (b) of Title X National Parks and Recreation Act of 1978, Pub. L. 95-625, (16 U.S.C. 2506); sec. 2 of Reorganization Plan No. 3 of 1950 (64 Stat. 1262))

[45 FR 54335, Aug. 15, 1980. Redesignated at 46 FR 34329, July 1, 1981; and correctly redesignated at 46 FR 43045, Aug. 26, 1981]
§ 1631.11 Intellectual property. ( a ) A recipient owns all products, technologies, and software developed or improved using LSC funds, subject to any agreement the recipient may have with a third-party vendor. LSC retains a royalty-free, nonexclusive, and irrevocable license to use, reproduce, distribute, publish, and prepare derivative works of any LSC-funded products, technologies, and software, including making them available to other LSC grantees or the broader access to justice community and partners.
( b ) A recipient must have a written contract with vendors who develop or improve LSC-funded products, technologies, and software. The contract must include a provision disclosing LSC's royalty-free, nonexclusive, and irrevocable license and prohibiting third-party vendors from denying its existence, challenging its legality, or interfering with LSC's full exercise of it.
§ 2105.36 What are the requester fee categories? ( a ) There are three categories of requesters for the purposes of determining fees: ( 1 ) Commercial-use;
( 2 ) Educational and noncommercial scientific institutions and representatives of news media; and
( 3 ) All others.
( b ) If you do not submit sufficient information in your FOIA request for the Agency to determine your proper fee category, the Agency may ask you to provide additional information (*see* § 2105.49). If you request placement in a particular fee category but the Agency places you in a different fee category, the Agency will provide you with an explanation of why you were not placed in the fee category you requested (for example, if you were placed in the commercial use requester category rather than the category you requested, the Agency will describe how the records would further your commercial, trade, or profit interests).
( c ) See § 2105.67 for the definitions of each of these fee categories.
# EXHIBIT 32.1

Each of, Edwin L. Adler, Chief
Executive Officer, and J. Grant Smith, Chief Financial Officer, of Clarkston Financial
Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)    
          the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended September 30,
          2005 which this statement accompanies fully complies with the requirements of
          Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2)    
          the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the
          quarterly period ended September 30, 2005 fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Clarkston
          Financial Corporation.

Date: November 14, 2005

| |  | /s/ Edwin L. Adler
Edwin L. AdlerChief Executive Officer
/s/ J. Grant Smith
J. Grant SmithChief Financial Officer
| |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
§ 1355.25 Principles of child and family services. The following principles, most often identified by practitioners and others as helping to assure effective services for children, youth, and families, should guide the States and Indian Tribes in developing, operating, and improving the continuum of child and family services. ( a ) The safety and well-being of children and of all family members is paramount. When safety can be assured, strengthening and preserving families is seen as the best way to promote the healthy development of children. One important way to keep children safe is to stop violence in the family including violence against their mothers.
( b ) Services are focused on the family as a whole; service providers work with families as partners in identifying and meeting individual and family needs; family strengths are identified, enhanced, respected, and mobilized to help families solve the problems which compromise their functioning and well-being.
( c ) Services promote the healthy development of children and youth, promote permanency for all children and help prepare youth emancipating from the foster care system for self-sufficiency and independent living.
( d ) Services may focus on prevention, protection, or other short or long-term interventions to meet the needs of the family and the best interests and need of the individual(s) who may be placed in out-of-home care.
( e ) Services are timely, flexible, coordinated, and accessible to families and individuals, principally delivered in the home or the community, and are delivered in a manner that is respectful of and builds on the strengths of the community and cultural groups.
( f ) Services are organized as a continuum, designed to achieve measurable outcomes, and are linked to a wide variety of supports and services which can be crucial to meeting families' and children's needs, for example, housing, substance abuse treatment, mental health, health, education, job training, child care, and informal support networks.
( g ) Most child and family services are community-based, involve community organizations, parents and residents in their design and delivery, and are accountable to the community and the client's needs.
( h ) Services are intensive enough and of sufficient duration to keep children safe and meet family needs. The actual level of intensity and length of time needed to ensure safety and assist the family may vary greatly between preventive (family support) and crisis intervention services (family preservation), based on the changing needs of children and families at various times in their lives. A family or an individual does not need to be in crisis in order to receive services.
[61 FR 58654, Nov. 18, 1996]
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.2

                   CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION FILED TO CORRECT
               A CERTAIN ERROR IN THE CERTIFICATE OF DESIGNATIONS
                                       OF
                                    TIVO INC.

                  FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE
                        OF DELAWARE ON JANUARY 17, 2001.


     TiVo Inc., a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the
General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware,

     DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:

     1. The name of the corporation is TiVo Inc.

     2. That a Certificate of Designations of Series B Junior Participating
Preferred Stock was filed with the Secretary of State of Delaware on January 17,
2001 and that said Certificate requires correction as permitted by Section 103
of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

     3. The inaccuracy or defect of said Certificate to be corrected is as
follows: The number of shares designated as "Series B Junior Participating
Preferred Stock" is changed from 700,000 to 1,500,000.

     4. Section 1 of the Certificate is corrected to read as follows:

     "Section 1. Designation and Amount. The shares of such series shall be
                 ----------------------
designated as "Series B Junior Participating Preferred Stock" (the "Series B
Preferred Stock") and the number of shares constituting the Series B Preferred
Stock shall be 1,500,000. Such number of shares may be increased or decreased by
resolution of the Board of Directors; provided, that no decrease shall reduce
the number of shares of Series B Preferred Stock to a number less than the
number of shares then outstanding plus the number of shares reserved for
issuance upon the exercise of outstanding options, rights or warrants or upon
the conversion of any outstanding securities issued by the Corporation
convertible into Series B Preferred Stock."

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said TiVo Inc. has caused this Certificate to be signed
by Alan C. Mendelson, its Secretary, this 17th day of January, 2001.

                                           TIVO, INC.

                                           By: /s/ Alan C. Mendelson
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Alan C. Mendelson, Secretary
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A19A0563. CIARA JOHNSON v. CHARLES WALDEN LANE.

This case began in superior court as a petition for custody and legitimation. It

was transferred to juvenile court because there was a related case pending there, and

the juvenile court apparently entered a final judgment in May 2016. Defendant Ciara

Johnson subsequently filed a motion to set aside, contending thatshe had notreceived

notice of the final judgment and asking the superior court to re-enter the judgment

pursuant to OCGA § 9-11-60 (g). The superior court denied the motion on the

ground that it was the juvenile court – not the superior court – that issued the order

in question. Johnson then filed this appeal. The superior court’s order, however, is

not directly appealable.

The denial of a motion for re-entry under OCGA § 9-11-60 (g) is generally

subject to direct appeal. See Crawford v. Kroger Co., 183 Ga. App. 836 (1) (360

SE2d 274) (1987). A legitimation action is a domestic relations case, however, and

an appeal in a domestic relations case must be initiated by filing an application for

discretionary review. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (2), (b); Cloud v. Norwood, 321 Ga.

App. 218, 218 (739 SE2d 93) (2013); Brown v. Williams, 174 Ga. App. 604, 604 (332

SE2d 48) (1985). “[C]ompliance with the discretionary appeals procedure is

jurisdictional.” Fabe v. Floyd, 199 Ga. App. 322, 332 (1) (405 SE2d 265) (1991).

Johnson’s failure to follow the discretionary review procedure deprives us of

jurisdiction over this appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED. See Cloud, 321 Ga. App.

at 218; Floyd, 199 Ga. App. at 332 (1).

December 06, 2018
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

12/06/2018
BILLING CODE: 6715-01-M

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: THURSDAY, JUNE 22, 2023 AT 10:30 P.M.

PLACE: HYBRID MEETING: 1050 FIRST STREET, N.E. WASHINGTON, D.C. (12TH

FLOOR) AND VIRTUAL. 

NOTE: FOR THOSE ATTENDING THE MEETING IN PERSON, CURRENT COVID-19 

SAFETY PROTOCOLS FOR VISITORS, WHICH ARE BASED ON THE CDC COVID-19 

HOSPITAL ADMISSION LEVEL IN WASHINGTON, D.C., WILL BE UPDATED ON THE 

COMMISSION’S CONTACT PAGE BY THE MONDAY BEFORE THE MEETING. SEE 

THE CONTACT PAGE AT https://www.fec.gov/contact/. IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO 

VIRTUALLY ACCESS THE MEETING, SEE THE INSTRUCTIONS BELOW.

STATUS: THIS MEETING WILL BE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC, SUBJECT TO THE 

ABOVE-REFERENCED GUIDANCE REGARDING THE COVID-19 HOSPITAL 

ADMISSION LEVEL AND CORRESPONDING HEALTH AND SAFETY PROCEDURES.

TO ACCESS THE MEETING VIRTUALLY, GO TO THE COMMISSION’S WEBSITE 

www.fec.gov AND CLICK ON THE BANNER TO BE TAKEN TO THE MEETING PAGE.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Notice of Availability: Public Citizen’s Petition for Rulemaking Regarding 

Use of Artificial Intelligence in Campaign Ads

Audit Division Recommendation Memorandum on the Communications 

Workers of America-Cope Political Contributions Committee (A21-09)

Management and Administrative Matters

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Judith Ingram, Press Officer

Telephone: (202) 694-1220

Individuals who plan to attend in person and who require special assistance, such as 

sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should contact Laura 

E. Sinram, Secretary and Clerk, at (202) 694-1040, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting 

date.

(Authority: Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b)

Laura E. Sinram

Secretary and Clerk of the Commission

Submitted: June 15, 2023