68108 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 220 / Friday, November 14, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 

written comments, data, or views. The 

most helpful comments reference a 

specific portion of the special 

conditions, explain the reason for any 

recommended change, and include 

supporting data. 

We will consider all comments we 

receive by the closing date for 

comments. We may change these special 

conditions based on the comments we 

receive. 

Type Certification Basis 

Under Title 14, Code of Federal 

Regulations (14 CFR) 21.17, Dassault 

must show that the Model Falcon 900EX 

airplane meets the applicable provisions 

of 14 CFR part 25, as amended by 

Amendments 25–1 through 25–129. 

If the Administrator finds that the 

applicable airworthiness regulations 

(i.e., 14 CFR part 25) do not contain 

adequate or appropriate safety standards 

for the Model Falcon 900EX airplane 

because of a novel or unusual design 

feature, special conditions are 

prescribed under § 21.16. 

Special conditions are initially 

applicable to the model for which they 

are issued. Should the type certificate 

for that model be amended later to 

include any other model that 

incorporates the same novel or unusual 

design feature, the special conditions 

would also apply to the other model 

under § 21.101. 

In addition to the applicable 

airworthiness regulations and special 

conditions, the Model Falcon 900EX 

airplane must comply with the fuel-vent 

and exhaust-emission requirements of 

14 CFR part 34, and the noisecertification requirements of 14 CFR 

part 36. The FAA must issue a finding 

of regulatory adequacy under section 

611 of Public Law 92–574, the ‘‘Noise 

Control Act of 1972.’’ 

The FAA issues special conditions, as 

defined in 14 CFR 11.19, under § 11.38, 

and they become part of the typecertification basis under § 21.17(a)(2). 

Novel or Unusual Design Features 

The Dassault Model Falcon 900EX 

airplane will incorporate the following 

novel or unusual design feature: 

The digital systems architecture for 

the Dassault Model Falcon 900EX 

airplane is composed of several 

connected networks. This network 

architecture is used for a diverse set of 

functions, providing data connectivity 

between systems, including: 

1. Airplane control, communication, 

display, monitoring and navigation 

systems, 

2. Operator business and 

administrative support systems, 

3. Passenger entertainment systems, 

and 

4. Access by systems external to the 

airplane. 

Discussion 

The Dassault Model Falcon 900EX 

airplane network architecture and 

configuration may allow increased 

connectivity to, and access from, 

external network sources, and operator 

operations and maintenance networks to 

the airplane control domain and 

operator-information-services domain. 

The airplane-control domain and 

operator-information-services domain 

perform functions required for the safe 

operation and maintenance of the 

airplane. Previously, these domains had 

very limited connectivity with external 

network sources. The network 

architecture and configuration may 

allow the exploitation of networksecurity vulnerabilities resulting in 

intentional or unintentional destruction, 

disruption, degradation, or exploitation 

of data, systems, and networks critical 

to the safety and maintenance of the 

airplane. 

The existing regulations and guidance 

material did not anticipate these types 

of airplane system architectures. 

Furthermore, 14 CFR regulations and 

current system-safety assessment policy 

and techniques do not address potential 

security vulnerabilities, which could be 

exploited by unauthorized access to 

airplane networks, data buses, and 

servers. Therefore, these special 

conditions are to ensure that 

unauthorized wired or wireless 

electronic connections do not 

compromise the security (i.e., 

confidentiality, integrity, and 

availability) of airplane systems. 

These special conditions contain the 

additional safety standards that the 

Administrator considers necessary to 

establish a level of safety equivalent to 

that established by the existing 

airworthiness standards. 

Applicability 

As discussed above, these special 

conditions apply to the Dassault Model 

Falcon 900EX airplane. Should Dassault 

apply later for a change to the type 

certificate to include another model 

incorporating the same novel or unusual 

design feature, the special conditions 

would apply to that model as well. 

Conclusion 

This action affects only certain novel 

or unusual design features on the 

Dassault Model Falcon 900EX airplane. 

It is not a rule of general applicability. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 25 

Aircraft, Aviation safety, Reporting 

and recordkeeping requirements. 

The authority citation for these 

special conditions is as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701, 

44702, 44704. 

The Special Conditions 

Accordingly, pursuant to the 

authority delegated to me by the 

Administrator, the following special 

conditions are issued as part of the typecertification basis for Dassault Model 

Falcon 900EX airplanes. 

1. The applicant must ensure airplane 

electronic system-security protection 

from access by unauthorized sources 

external to the airplane, including those 

possibly caused by maintenance 

activity. 

2. The applicant must ensure that 

electronic system-security threats are 

identified and assessed, and that 

effective electronic system-security 

protection strategies are implemented to 

protect the airplane from all adverse 

impacts on safety, functionality, and 

continued airworthiness. 

3. The applicant must establish 

appropriate procedures to allow the 

operator to ensure that continued 

airworthiness of the airplane is 

maintained, including all post-typecertification modifications that may 

have an impact on the approved 

electronic system-security safeguards. 

Issued in Renton, Washington, on 

November 5, 2014. 

Jeffrey E. Duven, 

Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, 

Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2014–26819 Filed 11–13–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 39 

[Docket No. FAA–2014–0337; Directorate 

Identifier 2013–SW–029–AD; Amendment 

39–18008; AD 2014–22–03] 

RIN 2120–AA64 

Airworthiness Directives; Various 

Restricted Category Helicopters 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: We are superseding 

Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2012–14– 

11 for Arrow Falcon Exporters, Inc. 

(AFE), Rotorcraft Development 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES

Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 220 / Friday, November 14, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 68109 

Corporation (RDC), and San Joaquin 

Helicopters (SJH) Model OH–58A, OH– 

58A+, and OH–58C helicopters. AD 

2012–14–11 required inspecting the 

main rotor mast (mast) for a crack. This 

new AD expands the mast inspection 

area, changes the inspection to a 

repetitive inspection, and removes the 

reporting requirement. The actions in 

this AD are intended to prevent failure 

of the mast and subsequent loss of 

control of the helicopter. 

DATES: This AD is effective December 

19, 2014. 

ADDRESSES: For Arrow Falcon 

Exporters, Inc. service information 

identified in this AD, contact Arrow 

Falcon Exporters, Inc., 2081 South 

Wildcat Way, Porterville, CA 93257; 

telephone (559) 781–8604; fax (559) 

781–9271; email afe@arrowfalcon.com. 

For Rotorcraft Development 

Corporation service information, contact 

Rotorcraft Development Corporation, PO 

Box 430, 1004 Eastside Highway, 

Corvallis, MT 59828; telephone (406) 

961–4100; fax (406) 961–4101; or at 

http://www.rotorcraftdevelopment.com. 

For United States Army service 

information, contact Commander, U. S. 

Army Aviation and Missile Command, 

ATTN: AMSAM–MMA–NP, Redstone 

Arsenal, AL 35898–5000, telephone 

(256) 876–4044; or at https://

www.logsa.army.mil/etmpdf/files/

030000/035016.pdf. 

You may view this referenced service 

information at the FAA, Office of the 

Regional Counsel, Southwest Region, 

2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663, Fort 

Worth, Texas 76137. 

Examining the AD Docket 

You may examine the AD docket on 

the Internet at http://

www.regulations.gov in Docket No. 

FAA–2014–0337; or in person at the 

Docket Management Facility between 9 

a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through 

Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD 

docket contains this AD, the economic 

evaluation, any comments received, and 

other information. The address for the 

Docket Office (phone: 800–647–5527) is 

Document Management Facility, U.S. 

Department of Transportation, Docket 

Operations, M–30, West Building 

Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 

New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, 

DC 20590. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John 

Cecil, Aviation Safety Engineer, Los 

Angeles Aircraft Certification Office, 

Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 

3960 Paramount Blvd., Lakewood, CA 

90712; telephone (562) 627–5228; email 

john.cecil@faa.gov; or Roger Caldwell, 

Aerospace Engineer, Denver Aircraft 

Certification Office, FAA, 26805 East 

68th Ave., Room 214, Denver, CO 

80249; telephone (303) 342–1086; email 

roger.caldwell@faa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Discussion 

We issued a notice of proposed 

rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR 

part 39 to remove AD 2012–14–11, 

Amendment 39–17125 (77 FR 42971, 

July 23, 2012) and add a new AD. AD 

2012–14–11 applied to AFE, RDC, and 

SJH Model OH–58A, OH–58A+, and 

OH–58C helicopters and required 

overhauling the mast and performing 

magnetic particle, fluorescent penetrant, 

and visual inspections for a crack, 

pitting, or corrosion in the threaded area 

of the mast and associated parts. AD 

2012–14–11 also required replacing the 

mast and reporting the results of the 

inspections if any crack, pitting, or 

corrosion was found. AD 2012–14–11 

was prompted by two mast failures 

caused by fatigue cracking and was 

intended to prevent failure of the mast 

and subsequent loss of control of the 

helicopter. 

The NPRM published in the Federal 

Register on June 2, 2014 (79 FR 31233) 

and proposed retaining the mast 

inspection and overhaul requirements of 

AD 2012–14–11, while changing the 

compliance time for the inspection from 

within 30 days to within 90 days, 

repeating the inspection every 1,200 

hours TIS or 3 years, expanding the 

inspection area, and removing the 

reporting requirement. 

Comments 

We gave the public the opportunity to 

participate in developing this AD, but 

we did not receive any comments on the 

NPRM (79 FR 31233, June 2, 2014). 

FAA’s Determination 

We have reviewed the relevant 

information and determined that an 

unsafe condition exists and is likely to 

exist or develop on other helicopters of 

these same type designs and that air 

safety and the public interest require 

adopting the AD requirements as 

proposed. 

Related Service Information 

AFE issued Alert Service Bulletin 

(ASB): 2012–58–01, Revision 1, dated 

February 20, 2012 (ASB 2012–58–01), 

which specifies overhauling and 

inspecting the mast for any cracks, 

pitting, or corrosion by following the 

procedures in the United States Army 

Aviation Unit and Intermediate 

Maintenance Manual TM55–1520–228– 

23. ASB 2012–58–01 further specifies 

replacing any mast with a crack, pitting, 

or corrosion beyond surface rust that is 

removed with a wire brush or steel wool 

in the threaded portion of the mast. 

RDC has issued ASB No. OH–58–13– 

01, dated January 30, 2013, which 

describes additional procedures for 

inspecting the mast and establishes an 

overhaul interval of 1,200 hours TIS or 

3 years, whichever occurs first. 

Differences Between This AD and the 

Service Information 

The service information does not 

apply to SJH helicopters. Those 

helicopters are included in this AD 

because they have the same mast design 

and are operated similarly to the AFE 

and RDC fleets. 

Costs of Compliance 

We estimate that this AD affects 80 

helicopters of U.S. Registry and that 

operators will incur the following costs 

in order to comply with this AD. At an 

average labor rate of $85 per hour, 

inspecting the mast requires about 20 

work hours, for a total cost of $1,700 per 

helicopter, and a total cost to the U.S. 

operator fleet of $136,000. Replacing a 

cracked main rotor mast requires about 

20 work hours, and required parts cost 

$11,891, for a total cost per helicopter 

of $13,591. 

Authority for This Rulemaking 

Title 49 of the United States Code 

specifies the FAA’s authority to issue 

rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, 

Section 106, describes the authority of 

the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, 

Aviation Programs, describes in more 

detail the scope of the Agency’s 

authority. 

We are issuing this rulemaking under 

the authority described in Subtitle VII, 

Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, 

‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that 

section, Congress charges the FAA with 

promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in 

air commerce by prescribing regulations 

for practices, methods, and procedures 

the Administrator finds necessary for 

safety in air commerce. This regulation 

is within the scope of that authority 

because it addresses an unsafe condition 

that is likely to exist or develop on 

products identified in this rulemaking 

action. 

Regulatory Findings 

We have determined that this AD will 

not have federalism implications under 

Executive Order 13132. This AD will 

not have a substantial direct effect on 

the States, on the relationship between 

the national government and the States, 

or on the distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES

68110 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 220 / Friday, November 14, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 

For the reasons discussed above, I 

certify that this AD: 

(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ under Executive Order 12866, 

(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures 

(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979), 

(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation 

in Alaska to the extent that a regulatory 

distinction is required, and 

(4) Will not have a significant 

economic impact, positive or negative, 

on a substantial number of small entities 

under the criteria of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation 

safety, Incorporation by reference, 

Safety. 

Adoption of the Amendment 

Accordingly, under the authority 

delegated to me by the Administrator, 

the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as 

follows: 

PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS 

DIRECTIVES 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 39 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. 

§ 39.13 [Amended] 

■ 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by 

removing Airworthiness Directive (AD) 

2012–14–11, Amendment 39–17125 (77 

FR 42971, July 23, 2012), and adding the 

following new AD: 

2014–22–03 Various Restricted Category 

Helicopters: Amendment 39–18008; 

Docket No. FAA–2014–0337; Directorate 

Identifier 2014–SW–029–AD. 

(a) Applicability 

This AD applies to Arrow Falcon 

Exporters, Inc. (AFE), Rotorcraft 

Development Corporation (RDC) (formerly 

Garlick Helicopter Corporation, and Garlick 

Helicopter, Inc.), and San Joaquin 

Helicopters (SJH) Model OH–58A, OH–58A+, 

and OH–58C helicopters, certificated in any 

category. 

(b) Unsafe Condition 

This AD defines the unsafe condition as a 

crack in the main rotor mast, which could 

result in failure of the mast and subsequent 

loss of control of the helicopter. 

(c) Affected AD 

This AD supersedes AD 2012–14–11, 

Amendment 39–17125 (77 FR 42971, July 23, 

2012). 

(d) Effective Date 

This AD becomes effective December 19, 

2014. 

(e) Compliance 

You are responsible for performing each 

action required by this AD within the 

specified compliance time unless it has 

already been accomplished prior to that time. 

(f) Required Actions 

(1) Within 90 days, unless accomplished 

previously within the last 12 months, and 

thereafter at intervals not exceeding 1,200 

hours time-in-service or 3 years, whichever 

occurs earlier: 

(i) Remove any surface rust with a wire 

brush or steel wool and, using a 10X or 

higher power magnifying glass, inspect the 

areas of the mast as shown in area E and area 

J of Figure 1 to Paragraph (f) of this AD for 

pitting, corrosion, or a crack. 

(ii) Overhaul the main rotor mast assembly 

and magnetic particle inspect the mast; mast 

bearing nut; plate, mast and seal; and bearing 

liner for a crack. 

(iii) Fluorescent penetrant inspect the 

locking plate for a crack. 

(2) If there is a crack, pitting, or corrosion, 

before further flight, replace the mast with an 

airworthy mast. 

(g) Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs) 

(1) For AFE and SJH helicopters, the 

Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification 

Office, FAA, may approve AMOCs for this 

AD. Send your proposal to: John Cecil, 

Aviation Safety Engineer, Los Angeles 

Aircraft Certification Office, Transport 

Airplane Directorate, FAA, 3960 Paramount 

Blvd., Lakewood, CA 90712; telephone (562) 

627–5228; email john.cecil@faa.gov. 

(2) For RDC helicopters, the Manager, 

Denver Aircraft Certification Office, FAA, 

may approve AMOCs for this AD. Send your 

proposal to: Roger Caldwell, Aerospace 

Engineer, Denver Aircraft Certification 

Office, FAA, 26805 East 68th Ave., Room 

214, Denver, CO 80249; telephone (303) 342– 

1086; email roger.caldwell@faa.gov. 

(3) For operations conducted under a 14 

CFR part 119 operating certificate or under 

14 CFR part 91, subpart K, we suggest that 

you notify your principal inspector, or 

lacking a principal inspector, the manager of 

the local flight standards district office or 

certificate holding district office before 


mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULESER14NO14.000</GPH>
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 220 / Friday, November 14, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 68111 

operating any aircraft complying with this 

AD through an AMOC. 

(h) Additional Information 

(1) Arrow Falcon Exporters, Inc., Alert 

Service Bulletin: 2012–58–01, Revision 1, 

dated February 20, 2012, which is not 

incorporated by reference, contains more 

information about the subject of this AD. For 

Arrow Falcon Exporters, Inc. service 

information identified in this AD, contact 

Arrow Falcon Exporters, Inc., 2081 South 

Wildcat Way, Porterville, CA 93257; 

telephone (559) 781–8604; fax (559) 781– 

9271; email afe@arrowfalcon.com. 

(2) Rotorcraft Development Corporation 

Alert Service Bulletin No. OH58–13–01, 

dated January 30, 2013, which is not 

incorporated by reference, contains more 

information about the subject of this AD. For 

Rotorcraft Development Corporation service 

information, contact Rotorcraft Development 

Corporation, PO Box 430, 1004 Eastside 

Highway, Corvallis, MT 59828; telephone 

(406) 961–4100; fax (406) 961–4101; or at 

http://www.rotorcraftdevelopment.com. 

(3) United States Army Technical Manual 

Aviation Unit and Intermediate Maintenance 

Manual Army Model OH–58A and OH–58C 

Helicopters, TM 55–1520–228–23–1, which 

is not incorporated by reference, contains 

more information about the subject of this 

AD. For United States Army service 

information, contact Commander, U.S. Army 

Aviation and Missile Command, ATTN: 

AMSAM–MMA–NP, Redstone Arsenal, AL 

35898–5000, telephone (256) 876–4044; or at 

https://www.logsa.army.mil/etmpdf/files/

030000/035016.pdf. 

(4) You may review the service information 

at the FAA, Office of the Regional Counsel, 

Southwest Region, 2601 Meacham Blvd., 

Room 663, Fort Worth, Texas 76137. 

(i) Subject 

Joint Aircraft Service Component (JASC) 

Code: 6300: Main Rotor Drive. 

Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on October 24, 

2014. 

Lance T. Gant, 

Acting Directorate Manager, Rotorcraft 

Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2014–26829 Filed 11–13–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 71 

[Docket No. 2014–0540; Amendment No. 

71–46] 

RIN 2120–AA66 

Airspace Designations; Incorporation 

by Reference Amendments 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Final rule, technical 

amendment. 

SUMMARY: This action incorporates 

certain amendments into FAA Order 

7400.9Y, dated August 6, 2014, and 

effective September 15, 2014, for 

incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 

§ 71.1. 

DATES: Effective date 0901 UTC 

November 14, 2014. The Director of the 

Federal Register approves this 

incorporation by reference action under 

1 CFR part 51, subject to the annual 

revision of FAA Order 7400.9 and 

publication of conforming amendments. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Sarah A. Combs, Airspace Policy and 

Regulations Group, Office of Airspace 

Services, Federal Aviation 

Administration, 800 Independence 

Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591; 

telephone: (202) 267–8783. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

History 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Airspace Order 7400.9, Airspace 

Designations and Reporting Points, 

incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 

71.1, is published yearly. Amendments 

referred to as ‘‘effective date straddling 

amendments’’ were published under 

Order 7400.9X (dated August 7, 2013, 

and effective September 15, 2013), but 

became effective under Order 7400.9Y 

(dated August 6, 2014, and effective 

September 15, 2014). This action 

incorporates these rules into the current 

FAA Order 7400.9Y. 

Accordingly, as this is an 

administrative correction to update final 

rule amendments into FAA Order 

7400.9Y, notice and public procedure 

under 5 U.S.C. 553(b) are unnecessary. 

Also, to bring these rules and legal 

descriptions current, I find that good 

cause exists, under 5 U.S.C. 553(d), for 

making this amendment effective in less 

than 30 days. 

The Rule 

This action amends title 14 Code of 

Federal Regulations (14 CFR) Part 71 to 

incorporate certain final rules into the 

current FAA Order 7400.9Y, Airspace 

Designations and Reporting Points, 

dated August 6, 2014, and effective 

September 15, 2014, which are depicted 

on aeronautical charts. 

The FAA has determined that this 

regulation only involves an established 

body of technical regulations for which 

frequent and routine amendments are 

necessary to keep them operationally 

current. Therefore, this regulation: (1) Is 

not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ 

under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not 

a ‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT 

Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 

FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3) 

does not warrant preparation of a 

regulatory evaluation as the anticipated 

impact is so minimal. Since this is a 

routine matter that only affects air traffic 

procedures and air navigation, it is 

certified that this rule, when 

promulgated, does not have a significant 

economic impact on a substantial 

number of small entities under the 

criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. 

The FAA’s authority to issue rules 

regarding aviation safety is found in 

Title 49 of the United States Code. 

Subtitle I, Section 106 describes the 

authority of the FAA Administrator. 

Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs, 

describes in more detail the scope of the 

agency’s authority. 

This rulemaking is promulgated 

under the authority described in 

Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 

40103. Under that section, the FAA is 

charged with prescribing regulations to 

assign the use of the airspace necessary 

to ensure the safety of aircraft and the 

efficient use of airspace. This regulation 

is within the scope of that authority as 

it makes the necessary updates for 

airspace areas within the National 

Airspace System. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71 

Airspace, Incorporation by reference, 

Navigation (air). 

Adoption of the Amendment 

In consideration of the foregoing, the 

Federal Aviation Administration 

amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows: 

PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, 

B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR 

TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND 

REPORTING POINTS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 71 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 

40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959– 

1963 Comp., p. 389. 

■ 2. Section 71.1 is revised to read as 

follows: 

§ 71.1 [Amended] 

For Docket No. FAA–2013–0171; 

Airspace Docket No. 13–ANM–6 (79 FR 

35279, June 20, 2014). On page 35279, 

column 3, line 6, under History; and on 

page 35280, column 1, line 63, under 

Amendatory Instruction 2 remove ‘‘. . . 

FAA Order 7400.9X, Airspace 

Designations and Reporting Points, 

dated August 7, 2013, and effective 

September 15, 2013, . . .’’ and add in 

its place ‘‘FAA Order 7400.9Y, Airspace 

Designations and Reporting Points, 

dated August 6, 2014, and effective 

September 15, 2014, . . .’’. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES