alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 10.14


                                    AMENDMENT

                           TO LEASE DATED MAY 3, 1994
                                 BY AND BETWEEN
                      JOHN G. B. ELLISON, JR. ("LANDLORD")
                                       AND
                    VES, INC., D/B/A VES EXTRUSIONS, INC. AND
                   ELLISON EXTRUSION SYSTEMS, INC., ("TENANT")

      Whereas Landlord completed a 17,550 square foot addition ("the Addition")
to the manufacturing/warehouse facility located on the Premises, and whereas the
Tenant occupied this additional space as of June 23, 1999; the parties hereby
confirm their agreement as to the minimum rent which applies to the Addition.

      Effective July 1, 1999, Tenant agrees to pay to Landlord Minimum Rent
for use of the Addition in the amount of SIXTY-ONE THOUSAND, FOUR HUNDRED,
TWENTY-FIVE AND NO/100 Dollars ($61,425.00) per annum, payable in equal
monthly installments of FIVE THOUSAND, ONE HUNDRED, EIGHTEEN, AND 75/100
Dollars ($5,118.75).

      Therefore, the total Minimum Rent for 51,300 (33,750 plus 17,550) total
square feet is ONE HUNDRED SEVENTY-EIGHT THOUSAND, FIVE HUNDRED,
SEVENTY-SEVEN AND 52/100 Dollars ($178,577.52) per annum, payable in equal
monthly installments of FOURTEEN THOUSAND, EIGHT HUNDRED, EIGHTY-ONE AND
46/100 Dollars ($14,881.46).

      The Addition is hereby deemed part of and inseparable from the premises
referred to in the Lease, and therefore, subject to all the terms and provisions
of said Lease and amendments thereto.

      ACCEPTED AND AGREED:

TENANT:                                         VES Inc., a Delaware Corporation



                                                 By: /s/ C. Douglas Cross
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                     C. Douglas Cross, President

(CORPORATE SEAL)

ATTEST:

/s/ Elaine M. Roberts
---------------------------------------
Elaine M. Roberts, Assistant Secretary


LANDLORD:


                                             /s/ John G. B. Ellison, Jr. (SEAL)
                                             -------------------------
                                               John G. B. Ellison, Jr.
#### § 1305.1 Purpose.

The purpose of this part is to define terms for the purposes of this subchapter.
EXHIBIT
31.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








I,
Richard Gingras, certify that:





1.
            I
      have reviewed this Form 10-Q of Salon Media Group,
  Inc.:





2.
            Based
      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
      material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
      report;





3.
            Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
      financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
      registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
      report;





4.
            The
      registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
      establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
      defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
      and have:





(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;





(b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and





(c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and





5.
            The
      registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
      our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
      to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's
      board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
      functions):





(a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and





(b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.







/s/ Richard
      GingrasAugust
      14, 2009
                Richard
      GingrasChief
      Executive
Officer
§ 101.2 Priorities and allocations authority. ( a ) Section 201 of Executive Order (E.O.) 13603, delegates the President's priorities and allocations authority under section 101 of the DPA. Section 101 of the DPA provides the President with authority to require acceptance and priority performance of contracts and orders (other than contracts of employment) to promote the national defense over performance of any other contracts or orders, and to allocate materials, services, and facilities as deemed necessary or appropriate to promote the national defense to a number of agencies. Section 201 of E.O. 13603 delegates the President's authority to specific agencies as follows: ( 1 ) The Secretary of Agriculture with respect to food resources, food resource facilities, livestock resources, veterinary resources, plant health resources, and the domestic distribution of farm equipment and commercial fertilizer;
( 2 ) The Secretary of Energy with respect to all forms of energy;
( 3 ) The Secretary of Health and Human Services with respect to health resources;
( 4 ) The Secretary of Transportation with respect to all forms of civil transportation;
( 5 ) The Secretary of Defense with respect to water resources; and
( 6 ) The Secretary of Commerce for all other materials, services, and facilities, including construction materials.
( b ) Section 202 of E.O. 13603 states that the authority delegated in section 201, except as provided in section 201(e) of E.O. 13603, may be used only to support programs that have been determined in writing as necessary or appropriate to promote the national defense: ( 1 ) By the Secretary of Defense with respect to military production and construction, military assistance to foreign nations, military use of civil transportation, stockpiles managed by the Department of Defense, space, and directly related activities.
( 2 ) By the Secretary of Energy with respect to energy production and construction, distribution, and use, and directly related activities; and
( 3 ) By the Secretary of Homeland Security with respect to all other national defense programs, including civil defense and continuity of Government.
( c ) Section 201(e) of E.O. 13603 provides that each department that is delegated allocations authority under section 201(a) of E.O. 13603 may use this authority with respect to control of the general distribution of any material (including applicable services) in the civilian market only after: ( 1 ) Making the finding required under section 101(b) of the DPA; and
( 2 ) The finding has been approved by the President.
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 225 (Wednesday, November 22, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 67707]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9327]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Fiscal Service


Surety Companies Acceptable on Federal Bonds: Philadelphia 
Indemnity Insurance Company

AGENCY: Financial Management Service, Fiscal Service, Department of the 
Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is Supplement No. 5 to the Treasury Department Circular 
570, 2006 Revision, published June 30, 2006, at 71 FR 37694.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Surety Bond Branch at (202) 874-6850.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A Certificate of Authority as an acceptable 
surety on Federal bonds is hereby issued under 31 U.S.C. 9305 to the 
following company:
    Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company (NAIC <greek-i>18058). 
Business Address: One Bala Plaza, Suite 100, Bala Cynwyd, Pennsylvania 
19004. Phone: (610) 617-7900 x7680. Underwriting Limitation b/: 
$59,578,000. Surety Licenses c/: AL, AK, CA, CO, DE, DC, HI, ID, IL, 
IN, IA, KY, MD, MA, MN, MS, MO, MT, NE, NV, NH, NJ, NC, ND, OH, OK, PA, 
RI, SC, SD, TN, TX, UT, VT, VA, WA, WV, WI. Incorporated In: 
Pennsylvania.
    Federal bond-approving officers should annotate their reference 
copies of the Treasury Circular 570 (``Circular''), 2006 Revision, to 
reflect this addition. Certificates of Authority expire on June 30th 
each year, unless revoked prior to that data. The Certificates are 
subject to subsequent annual renewal as long as the companies remain 
qualified (see 31 CFR part 223). A list of qualified companies is 
published annually as of July 1 in the Circular, which outlines details 
as to underwriting limitations, areas in which companies are licensed 
to transact surety business, and other information.
    The Circular may be viewed and downloaded through the Internet at 
http://www.fms.treas.gov/c570.
    Questions concerning this Notice may be directed to the U.S. 
Department of the Treasury, Financial Management Service, Financial 
Accounting and Services Division, Surety Bond Branch, 3700 East-West 
Highway, Room 6F01, Hyattsville, MD 20782.

    Dated: November 9, 2006.
Vivian L. Cooper,
Director, Financial Accounting and Services Division, Financial 
Management Service.
[FR Doc. 06-9327 Filed 11-21-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-35-M
Opinion issued January 19 , 202 3

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 20
- 00732
- CV

——————————— UMUOJI IMPROVEMENT UNION (NORTH AMERICA), INC., A

NEBRASKA CORPORATION , Appella nt

V. U MUOJI IMPROVEMENT UNION ( NORTH AMERICA), INC., A

MASSACHUSETTS CORPORATION , Appell e e
On Appeal from the 268th District Court Fort Bend County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. 19
- DCV
- 258782

MEMORANDUM OPINION On July 25, 2022 , the parties filed a joint motion to remand to the trial court for implementation of a settlement agreement. Th e appeal had already been
scheduled for submission o n the briefs and was submitted on August 2, 2022. In the2

joint motion , the parties ask ed t his Court to set aside the trial court’s judgment without regard to the merits and remand th e appeal to the trial court for implementation of the parties’ settlement agreement. We grant the motion. We order the trial court’s judgment signed on May 3,
20 22 set aside without regard to the merits and we remand the case to the trial court for implementation of the parties’ settlement agreement. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B). Any other pending motions are dismissed as moot. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Kelly, Goodman , and Guerra

.
No. 95-3401

Steven L. King, *
* Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Nebraska. Burlington Northern Railroad * [UNPUBLISHED] Company, A Corporation, *
* Appellee. *

Submitted: March 13, 1996 Filed: March 29, 1996

Before MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, FLOYD R. GIBSON, and HEANEY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The App ellant, Steven L. King, is employed by the Burlington Norther n Railroad Company (Burlington). On June 25, 1991, he suffered a back injur y while repairing railroad cars. After undergoing physical therapy, Kin g returned to work on July 11, 1991. Claiming that his employer negligentl y failed to provide him with sufficient assistance, King brought a suit unde r the F ederal Employers' Liability Act, 45 U.S.C. § 51 (FELA) to recove r damages. Burlington responded that King failed to work safely by failing to seek h elp from co-workers, by failing to wait for assistance, and b y failing to complain about his inability to accom plish his tasks. The case was tried to a jury, and a verdict was returned in favor of the defendant.

On ap peal, King argues that the district court failed to properl y instruct the jury with respect to the specific dutiesimposed upon a railro ad company by FELA. We will not disturb the verdict

so lon g as the charge, when viewed as a whole, fairly and adequatel y refle cts the applicable law. Resolution Trust Corp. v. Eason , 17 F.3 d 1126, 1132 (8th Cir. 1994). After a careful exa mination of the challenged charges, we hold that they are consistent with Eighth Circuit pattern jur y instructions, see Ma nual of Model Civil Jury Instructions—Eighth Circuit 186 (1995), and adequately state the defendant's duties under federal law.

Therefore, we affirm.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### George C. Rankin, as Receiver of the Elmira National Bank, Respondent, *v.*John J. Bush et al., Appellants.

*Rankin*v. *Busk,*123 App. Div. 924, affirmed.

(Argued January 18, 1909;

decided February 9, 1909.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered Janu*568ary 29,1908, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover upon a cashier’s bond.

*Judson A. Gibson*and *Friend H. Miller*for appellants.

*Edward B.*Whitney, *Edward S. Frith*and *Winston H. Hagen*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., Edward T. Bartlett, Yann, Hisoock and Chase, JJ. Dissenting: Gray and Haight, JJ.
# EUR-Lex - 12008E083 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008E083

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - PART THREE: UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS - TITLE V: AREA OF FREEDOM, SECURITY AND JUSTICE - Chapter 4: Judicial cooperation in criminal matters - Article 83 (ex Article 31 TEU) **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0080 - 0081 *

Article 83

(ex Article 31 TEU)

1. The European Parliament and the Council may, by means of directives adopted in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure, establish minimum rules concerning the definition of criminal offences and sanctions in the areas of particularly serious crime with a cross-border dimension resulting from the nature or impact of such offences or from a special need to combat them on a common basis.

These areas of crime are the following: terrorism, trafficking in human beings and sexual exploitation of women and children, illicit drug trafficking, illicit arms trafficking, money laundering, corruption, counterfeiting of means of payment, computer crime and organised crime.

On the basis of developments in crime, the Council may adopt a decision identifying other areas of crime that meet the criteria specified in this paragraph. It shall act unanimously after obtaining the consent of the European Parliament.

2. If the approximation of criminal laws and regulations of the Member States proves essential to ensure the effective implementation of a Union policy in an area which has been subject to harmonisation measures, directives may establish minimum rules with regard to the definition of criminal offences and sanctions in the area concerned. Such directives shall be adopted by the same ordinary or special legislative procedure as was followed for the adoption of the harmonisation measures in question, without prejudice to Article 76.

3. Where a member of the Council considers that a draft directive as referred to in paragraph 1 or 2 would affect fundamental aspects of its criminal justice system, it may request that the draft directive be referred to the European Council. In that case, the ordinary legislative procedure shall be suspended. After discussion, and in case of a consensus, the European Council shall, within four months of this suspension, refer the draft back to the Council, which shall terminate the suspension of the ordinary legislative procedure.

Within the same timeframe, in case of disagreement, and if at least nine Member States wish to establish enhanced cooperation on the basis of the draft directive concerned, they shall notify the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission accordingly. In such a case, the authorisation to proceed with enhanced cooperation referred to in Article 20(2) of the Treaty on European Union and Article 329(1) of this Treaty shall be deemed to be granted and the provisions on enhanced cooperation shall apply.

--------------------------------------------------
# Dziennik Urzędowy C 94A/28 k

| | ISSN 1725-5228 |
| --- | --- |
| Dziennik Urzędowy
  Unii Europejskiej | C 94A |
| | |
| Wydanie polskie | Informacje i zawiadomienia | Tom 5028 kwietnia 2007 |

ISSN 1725-5228

Dziennik Urzędowy

Unii Europejskiej

C 94A

Wydanie polskie

Informacje i zawiadomienia

Tom 5028 kwietnia 2007

---

| Powiadomienie nr | Spis treśći | Strona |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | Sprostowania |
| 2007/C 094A/01 | Sprostowanie do ogłoszenia o otwartym konkursie na stanowisko: kierownik ds. badań – ekspert ds. prognoz – Nr referencyjny: EF/TA/07/02 (Dz. U. C 68 A z 24.3.2007) | 1 |

Powiadomienie nr

Spis treśći

Strona

Sprostowania

2007/C 094A/01

Sprostowanie do ogłoszenia o otwartym konkursie na stanowisko: kierownik ds. badań – ekspert ds. prognoz – Nr referencyjny: EF/TA/07/02 (Dz. U. C 68 A z 24.3.2007)

1

| PL | |
| --- | --- |

PL

---

Sprostowania

| 28.4.2007 | PL | Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej | CA 94/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2007

PL

Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej

CA 94/1

---

Sprostowanie do ogłoszenia o otwartym konkursie na stanowisko: kierownik ds. badań – ekspert ds. prognoz – Nr referencyjny: EF/TA/07/02

(
  Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej C 68 A z dnia 24 marca 2007 r.
  )

(2007/C 94 A/01)

Strona 4, tytuł V. ZGŁOSZENIA:

zamiast:

„[...] 20 kwietnia 2007 r.”,

powinno być:

„[...] 1 czerwca 2007 r.”.

---
§ 150.411 Dismissal of request for hearing. An ALJ will order a request for hearing dismissed if the ALJ determines that: ( a ) The request for hearing was not filed within 30 days as specified by § 150.405(a) or any extension of time granted by the ALJ pursuant to § 150.405(b).
( b ) The request for hearing fails to meet the requirements of § 150.407.
( c ) The entity that filed the request for hearing is not a respondent under § 150.401.
( d ) The respondent has abandoned its request.
( e ) The respondent withdraws its request for hearing.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

** **

Theundersigned, as the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board, and asthe Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of CompuCredit Corporation, certifythat, to the best of their knowledge and belief, the Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005, which accompanies thiscertification fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and theinformation contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of CompuCreditCorporation at the dates and for the periods indicated. The foregoingcertifications are made pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350) and shall not be relied upon for any otherpurpose.

 

This3rd day of August, 2005.

 
|     | /s/ DAVID G. HANNA                                    |     |
|----------|-------------------------------------------------------|----------|
|     | David G. Hanna                                        |     |
| * * | *Chief Executive Officer and   Chairman of the Board* | * * |
|     |                                                  |     |
|     | /s/ J.PAUL WHITEHEAD, III                             |     |
|     | J.Paul Whitehead, III                                 |     |
| * * | *Chief Financial Officer*                             | * * |

 

A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwiseadopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic versionof this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided toCompuCredit Corporation and will be retained by CompuCredit Corporation andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request

 

----
# The Attorney General of Texas
June 25, 1979 MARKWHITE AttorneyGeneral
HonorableTim Curry Tarrant County District Attorney Tarrant County Courthouse Fort Worth,Texas 76102 OpinionNo. Mw-27 Re: Whether a county may purchase capital equipment with funds collected pursuant to article 7046a, V.T.C.S. Dear Mr. Curry: You have requested an opinion concernin& the purposes for which a county may expend road funds collected pursuant to article 7048a, V.T.C.S. You specifically ask whether capital equipment may be purchased with article 7048afunds. Article 7048a authorizes the counties of the state to collect ad valorem taxes with the proviso that

the revenue therefrom shall be used as provided in this Act for the construction and maintenance of. Farm-to-Market and Lateral Roads or for Flood Control and for these two (2)purposes only. V.T.C.S. art. 70484 S2. Constitutional basis for such tax is foundin article VIR, section l-a of the Texas Constitution. Section 3 of the statute requires the commissioners court to establish a separate Farm-to-Market and Lateral Road Fund and a separate Flood Control Fund. These funds are under the jurisdiction and control of the commissioners court. Sees. 4, 5. The road funds may be used for the construction and maintenance of farm-to-market and lateral roads and for the acquisition of necessary rights of way. Sec. 4. ln our opinion capital. &quipment which is needed for construction and maintenance of farm-to-market roads may be purchased with article 7048a funds. The equipment may be used solely for the putposes indicated in the statute. See generally Guerra 239S.W.2d915(Tex. Civ. App.

- San Antonio 1951, no writ); V.T.C.S. ‘arts. 2351d (purchase of road equipment through Board of Control); 2368a (advertising for competitive bids); 6741(authority to purchase road machinery and equipment); Attorney General Opinions H-530 (1975)(article 7048a funds cannot be consolidated with other county moneys); M-1250(1972);M-367 (1969);G-6654 (1945);See Attorney General OpinionV-R69(1951) (construction of “lateral road”). -

p. 82HonorableTim Curry - PageTwo (~w-27)

SUMMARY

. Article 7048a funds may be used to buy capital equipment to be used for the construction and maintenance of farm-to-market roads.

Attorney General of Texas JOHN W.FAINTER,JR. First Assiitant Attorney General TEDL. HARTLEY Executive.Assiitant Attorney Genera) Preperedby David B. Brooks Assistant Attorney General APPROVED: OPINION

COMMlTTEE C. Robert Heath, Chairman David B. Brooks, ~’ WalterDavis SusanGarrison RickGilpin WilliamG Reid

P. 83