alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 992 Engrossed Amendment House (EAH)]

<DOC>
                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      December 4, 2023.
    Resolved, That the bill from the Senate (S. 992) entitled ``An Act 
to amend the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 
to designate the Texas and New Mexico portions of the future 
Interstate-designated segments of the Port-to-Plains Corridor as 
Interstate Route 27, and for other purposes.'', do pass with the 
following

                               AMENDMENT:

            Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert:

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``I-27 Numbering Act of 2023''.

SEC. 2. NUMBERING OF DESIGNATED FUTURE INTERSTATE.

    (a) In General.--Section 1105(e)(5)(C)(i) of the Intermodal Surface 
Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (Public Law 102-240) is amended 
by inserting ``The routes referred to in clause (i) (other than 
subclauses (V)(aa) and (V)(bb) and subclause (IX)(aa) of that clause) 
and clause (iv) of subsection (c)(38)(A) are designated as Interstate 
Route I-27. The route referred to in subsection (c)(38)(A)(i)(V)(aa) is 
designated as Interstate Route I-27E. The route referred to in 
subsection (c)(38)(A)(i)(V)(bb) is designated as Interstate Route I-
27W. The route referred to in subsection (c)(38)(A)(i)(IX)(aa) is 
designated as Interstate Route I-127N.'' before ``The route referred to 
in subsection (c)(45)''.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--Section 1105(c)(38)(A)(i) of the 
Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (Public Law 
102-240) is amended--
            (1) in subclause (V)--
                    (A) by striking ``Lamesa, the Corridor'' and 
                inserting the following: ``Lamesa--
                                    ``(aa) the Corridor''; and
                    (B) in item (aa) (as so redesignated), by striking 
                ``87 and, the Corridor'' and inserting the following: 
                ``87; and
                                    ``(bb) the Corridor''; and
            (2) in subclause (IX)--
                    (A) by striking ``(IX) United States Route 287'' 
                and inserting the following:
                            ``(IX)(aa) United States Route 287''; and
                    (B) in item (aa) (as so redesignated), by striking 
                ``Oklahoma, and also United States Route 87'' and 
                inserting the following: ``Oklahoma; and
                            ``(bb) United States Route 87''.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
118th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 992

_______________________________________________________________________

                               AMENDMENT
```
#### § 156.963 Final order not subject to review.

In an action brought under § 156.961, the validity and appropriateness of the final order imposing a civil money penalty is not subject to review.
#### § 1156.11 Notice to subrecipients.

Where a recipient passes on Federal financial assistance from the Endowment to subrecipients, the recipient shall provide the subrecipients with written notice regarding the subrecipient's obligations under the Act and the regulations in this part.
§ 2105.14 What is multitrack processing and how does it affect your request? ( a ) Processing tracks are used to distinguish simple requests from more complex ones on the basis of the estimated number of workdays needed to process the request.
( b ) In determining the number of workdays needed to process the request, the Agency considers factors such as the number of pages involved in processing the request or the need for consultations.
( c ) The basic processing tracks are designated as follows: ( 1 ) Simple: Requests in this track will take between one to five workdays to process;
( 2 ) Normal: Requests in this track will take between six to twenty workdays to process;
( 3 ) Complex: Requests in this track will take between twenty-one workdays and sixty workdays to process; or
( 4 ) Voluminous: Requests in this track involve very complex processing challenges, which may include a large number of potentially responsive records, and will take over sixty workdays to process.
( d ) The Agency also has a specific processing track for requests that are granted expedited processing under the standards in § 2105.18. These requests will be processed as soon as practicable.
( e ) The Agency must advise you of the track into which your request falls and, when appropriate, will offer you an opportunity to narrow your request so that it can be placed in a different processing track. If you request placement in a particular processing track but the Agency places you in a different processing track, the Agency will provide you with an explanation of why you were not placed in the processing track you requested.
( f ) The use of multitrack processing does not alter the statutory deadline for an Agency to determine whether to comply with your FOIA request (*see* § 2105.15).
( g ) You may inquire about the status of your request, including its estimated processing completion date, by contacting the FOIA Public Liaison, whose contact information may be found at *https://www.cfa.gov/foia .*
##### 



EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002


In connection with the quarterly report of
Park-Ohio Industries, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned
officers of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to such officers knowledge:



| |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) The Report fully complies with the
    requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
    Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                                               
|
| | (2) The information contained in the Report
    fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
    condition and results of operations of the Company as of the
    dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.

Date: May 13, 2005



| |    |                       
| | -- | ----------------------
| | By | /s/ EDWARD F. CRAWFORD

| |                                            
| | -------------------------------------------
| |                                            
| | Name: Edward F. Crawford                   
| | Title: Chairman and Chief Executive Officer



| |    |                       
| | -- | ----------------------
| | By | /s/ RICHARD P. ELLIOTT

| |                                                  
| | -------------------------------------------------
| |                                                  
| | Name: Richard P. Elliott                         
| | Title: Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished
solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed
as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
#### § 1225.18 Notification of class members of decision.

Class members shall be notified by the agency of the final agency decision and corrective action, if any, using at the minimum, the same media employed to give notice of the existence of the class complaint. The notice, where appropriate, shall include information concerning the rights of class members to seek individual relief and of the procedures to be followed. Notice shall be given by the Agency within ten (10) calendar days of the transmittal of its decision to the agent.
#### § 155.355 Right to appeal.

*Individual appeals.* The Exchange must include the notice of the right to appeal and instructions regarding how to file an appeal in any eligibility determination notice issued to the applicant in accordance with § 155.310(g), § 155.330(e)(1)(ii), or § 155.335(h)(1)(ii).
Date of 

report 

1970 

May 22 

&ruatr nf tqr luitr~ itutrs 

NINETY-FIRST CONGRESS 

F S {Convened January 3, 1969 

IRST ESSION Adjourned December 23, 1969 

S S {Convened January 19, 1970 

ECOND ESSION 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Pre pared under the direction of FRANCIS R. V ALEo, Secretary of the Senate 

By GERALD A. HACKETT, Executive Clerk 

Monday, May 25, 1970 

NOMINATION 

Calendar Message Name ofnommee Office Predecessor 

No No 

U.N. TRUSTEESHIP 

COUNCIL 

70 130 E>am Harry Wnght, of the Confirmed by the Senatf' 

D1stnct of Columb1t Nov 26, 1969, as the 

representatiVe of the 

Umtod C\tates of Amenca 

on the Trusteeship 

Counml of the Umted 

N atwns, to srrve on tho 

ConnCJl w1th the rank of 

Amba~~ad01 

37-022--70--No 177 

U S GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1970
#### People *ex rel.*Baker v. Board of Audit and Apportionment, appellants.

*Mehearing of motion.*

A motion for a rehearing of a motion made at a general term, to set aside an order made at a special term, on the ground that the appellants failed to print all the papers on appeal, and that copies of those printed were not served on the respondents in time to enable them to discover a mistake therein, where it appeared that the error sought to be corrected was objected to and the point argued on the appeal, was denied.

Motion for a rehearing on behalf of relator, John T. Baker.

Donohue, J.

The head-note gives the substance of the opinion, which is not important for publication.

*Motion denied.*
On Motion to Dismiss, decided. January 24, 1911.

Dismissed on Motion of Respondent May 31, 1911.

#### BLUMAUER-FRANK DRUG CO. *v.*HORTICULTURAL FIRE RELIEF OF OREGON.*

[112 Pac. 1084.]

Constitutional Law—Final Judgments—Granting New Trial.

1. Section 6, Article VTI, of the Constitution of Oregon, giving the Supreme Court jurisdiction only to review final decisions, not being self-executing, the legislature must prescribe what constitutes final decision, so that Section 548, L. O. L., with the amendment (Laws 1907, p. 313), declaring that an order setting aside a judgment and granting a new trial shall be deemed a final judgment, is not unconstitutional.

Appeal and Error—Nature op Right op Appeal.

2. The “right of appeal is statutory.

From Marion: George H. Burnett, Judge.

This is an action by the Blumauer-Frank Drug Company against the Horticultural Fire Relief of Oregon. There was a judgment in favor of plaintiff, and from *59an order setting aside the judgment and granting a new trial, plaintiff appeals, and defendant moves to dismiss the appeal.

Motion Denied.

*Mr. John Bayne,*for the motion.

*Messrs. Joseph & Haney, contra.*

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Eakin.

Judgment for the plaintiff was rendered upon the verdict in this action. Thereupon defendant moved the court to set aside the judgment and grant a new trial, which was allowed by the court. From that order plaintiff appeals, and defendant moves to dismiss the same, because the order appealed from is not a final judgment.

1, 2. As held in *Portland*v. *Gaston,*38 Or. 533 (63 Pac. 1051), the provision of the constitution (Article VII, Section 6) that the Supreme Court shall have jurisdiction only to review the final decisions of the circuit courts, is not self-executing. The cases that may be appealed must be prescribed by the legislature, and it may determine what shall constitute a final decision. The right of appeal is statutory: *State*v. *Security Savings Co.,*28 Or. 410 (43 Pac. 162); *School District*v. *Irwin,*34 Or. 431 (56 Pac. 413); *Sears*v. *Dunbar,*50 Or. 36 (91 Pac. 145). The provisions of Section 548, L. O. L., necessarily include all judgments and decrees, and define certain other orders that shall be deemed judgments or decrees. This includes the amendment (Laws 1907, p. 313), providing that an order setting aside a judgment and granting a new trial shall, for the purpose of being reviewed, be deemed a final judgment, and is not uncoustitutional.

The motion to dismiss is denied. Denied.

Mr. Justice Burnett, having tried this case in the lower court, took no part in its decision.
Editorial Note on Subpart E of Part 170
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subpart E of part 170 appear at 80 FR 62755, Oct. 16, 2015.

§ 170.525 Application submission. ( a ) An applicant for ONC-ACB or ONC-ATL status must submit its application either electronically via email (or Web site submission if available), or by regular or express mail.
( b ) An application for ONC-ACB or ONC-ATL status may be submitted to the National Coordinator at any time.
[81 FR 72465, Oct. 19, 2016]
** **

** **

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS**

 

 

 

We consent to the use of our reportdated April 29, 2013 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Rainchief Energy Inc. for the years ended December31, 2012, 2011, and 2010 included in this Annual Report on Form 20-F (filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) for theyear ended December 31, 2012, filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

 

 

 

 

**“WDM Chartered Accountants”**

 

 

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

August20, 2013

 

** **
```

[House Report 106-882]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

106th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 2d Session                                                     106-882

======================================================================

 
WAIVING A REQUIREMENT OF CLAUSE 6(a) OF RULE XIII WITH RESPECT TO THE 
  SAME DAY CONSIDERATION OF CERTAIN RESOLUTIONS REPORTED BY THE RULES 
  COMMITTEE

                                _______
                                

 September 21, 2000.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

                                _______
                                

Mr. Hastings of Washington, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the 
                               following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 586]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 586, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

                summary of provisions of the resolution

    The resolution waives clause 6(a) of rule XIII (requiring a 
two-thirds vote to consider a rule on the same day it is 
reported from the Rules Committee) against certain resolutions 
reported from the Rules Committee. The rule applies the waiver 
to a special rule reported on the legislative day of September 
25, 2000, providing for consideration or disposition of a 
conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 4578) making 
appropriations for the Department of the Interior and related 
agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2001, or any 
amendment reported in disagreement from a conference thereon.

                                  

```
SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

ONE HUNDREDTH CONGRESS 

Convened January 6, 1987 

FIRST SESSION { 

SECOND SESSION { 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Monday, March 30, 1987 

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF WALTER J. STEWART, 

SECRETARY OF THE SENATE 

By Gerald A. Hackett, Executive Clerk 
1 

TREATIES 

Calendar Treaty Subject 

No. Doc. No. 

1 EX. Treaty with the Union of Soviet Socialist 

N(A). Republics on the Limitation of Underground 

94-2 Nuclear Weapon Tests, and the Protocol 

thereto (Threshold Test Ban Treaty). 

2 EX. Treaty with the Union of Soviet Socialist 

N(B), Republics on Underground Nuclear 

94-2 Explosions for Peaceful Purposes, and the 

Protocol thereto (Peaceful Nuclear 

Explosions Treaty). 

NOMINATIONS 

Calendar Message Nominee, Office, And Predecessor 

No. No. 

Reported 

Bv 

Feb 27 87 Reported 

favorably, with a 

resolution of advice and 

consent to ratification 

with a reservation and a 

declaration, by Mr. Pell, 

Committee on Foreign 

Relations (Printed Report 

together with additional 

views--Ex. Rept. 100-1) 

Feb 27 87 Reported 

favorably, with a 

resolution of advice and 

consent to ratification 

with a reservation and a 

declaration, by Mr. Pell, 

Committee on Foreign 

Relations (Printed report 

together with additional 

views--Ex. Rept 100-1) 

Reported 

Bv 
2 

Calendar Message Nominee, Office, And Predecessor Reported 

* 

No. No. Bv 

DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

2 73-3 Arnold Lewis Raphel, of New Jersey, a Feb 24, 87 Mr. Pell, 

Career Member of the Senior Foreign Committee on Foreign 

Service, Class of Minister-Counselor. to Relations, without printed 

be Ambassador Extraordinary and report. Mar 6, 87 Mr. 

Plenipotentiary of the United States of Pell, Committee on Foreign 

America to the Islamic Republic of Relations, filed a printed 

Pakistan. report (Printed report 

together with additional 

views--Ex. Reot. 100-2). .. . *S1gmf1es nominee's commitment to respond to requests to appear and testify before any duly 

constituted committee of the Senate.
RESOLUTIONS

CALENDAR 

NO

S. RES 

NO

SUBJECT REPORTED 

BY

1

 
TREATIES

CALENDAR 

NO

TREATY

DOC NO

SUBJECT REPORTED 

BY

2

 
* Signifies nominee’s commitment to respond to requests to appear and testify before any duly constituted committee of the Senate 

NOMINATIONS

CALENDAR 

NO

MESSAGE

NO

NOMINEE, OFFICE, AND PREDECESSOR REPORTED 

BY

3

THE JUDICIARY 

38 33 George H. Wu, of California, to be United States 

District Judge for the Central District of 

California, vice Ronald S. W. Lew, retired. 

Mar 01, 2007 Reported by Mr. 

Leahy, Committee on the 

Judiciary, without printed 

report. 

43 6 Vanessa Lynne Bryant, of Connecticut, to be 

United States District Judge for the District of 

Connecticut, vice Dominic J. Squatrito, retired. 

Mar 08, 2007 Reported by Mr. 

Leahy, Committee on the 

Judiciary, without printed 

report. 

ARMY 

44 212 The following named officer for appointment as 

the Chief of Engineers/Commanding General, 

United States Army Corps of Engineers, and 

appointment to the grade indicated in the 

United States Army, while assigned to a 

position of importance and responsibility under 

title 10, U.S.C., sections 601 and 3036: 

Mar 15, 2007 Reported by Mr. 

Levin, Committee on Armed 

Services, without printed 

report. 

to be Lieutenant General 

 Lt. Gen. Robert L. Van Antwerp, Jr., 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

49 185 John Wood, of Missouri, to be United States 

Attorney for the Western District of Missouri 

for the term of four years, vice Todd Peterson 

Graves, resigned. 

Mar 19, 2007 Reported by Mr. 

Leahy, Committee on the 

Judiciary, without printed 

report.
#### Eugene L. Bushe et al., Individually and as Trustees for Gunning S. Bedford, 3d, Respondents, *v.*Mary E. Wright et al., Respondents, and Frederic D. Wells, as Administrator of the Estate of Gunning S. Bedford, 3d, Deceased, and Executor of Helen M. Bedford, Deceased, Appellant.

*Bushe*v. *Wright,*118 App. Div. 368, affirmed.

(Argued February 24, 1909;

decided March 16, 1909.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered April 29, 1907, affirming a judgment entered upon the report of a referee in an action to procure a final judicial settlement of the accounts of Eugene L. Bushe and others, as trustees for Gunning S. Bedford, 3d, deceased.

*O. J. Wells*for appellant.

*Franlilin W. M. Gutoheon, Frederic B,.*Goudert, *Tompkins*Mellvaine, *Howard Thayer Hingshury*and *Augustine L. Humes*for respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with one bill of costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Yann, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ.
SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

ONE HUNDRED SIXTH CONGRESS 

FIRST SESSION { CONVENEDJANUARY6, 1999 

SECOND SESSION { 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Monday, June 7, 1999 

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF GARY SISCO, 

SECRETARYOFTHE SENATE 

By Michelle Haynes, Executive Clerk 
1 

RESOLUTIONS 

CALENDAR Ex. REs REPORTED 

No. No. SUBJECT BY 
2 

TREATIES 

CALENDAR TREATY REPORTED 

No. Doc. No. SUBJECT BY 

I 

I 

I li 

I 

I 

I 

I 

I 
3 

NOMINATIONS 

CALENDAR MESSAGE REPORTED 

No. No. NOMINEE, OFFICE, AND PREDECESSOR BY 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

* 15 22 Gary S. Guzy, ofthe District of Columbia, to be Mar 17, 99 Reported by Mr. 

an Assistant Administrator of the Chafee, Committee on 

Environmental Protection Agency, vice Environment and Public Works, 

Jonathan Z. Cannon, resigned. without printed report. 

DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

* 35 3-8 Diane Edith Watson, of California, to be Apr 14, 99 Reported by Mr. Helms, 

Ambassador Extraordinary and Committee on Foreign Relations, 

Plenipotentiary of the United States of without printed report. 

America to the Federal States of Micronesia. 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

* 59 1-5 Kenneth M. Bresnahan, ofVirginia, to be Chief Apr 30, 99 Reported by Mr. 

Financial Officer, DepartmentofLabor, vice Jeffords, Committee on Health, 

Edmundo A. Gonzales, resigned. Education, Labor, and Pensions, 

without printed report. 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

* 70 4-4 Carolyn L. Huntoon, of Virginia, to be an Mar 25, 99 Reported by Mr. 

Assistant Secretary of Energy (Environmental Murkowski, Committee on 

Management), vice Alan L. Alm, resigned. Energy and Natural Resources, 

without printed report. 

May 10, 99 Senate Committee on 

Anned Services discharged. 

EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT 

* 71 108 George T. Frampton, Jr., of the District of May 12, 99 Reported by Mr. 

Columbia, to be a Member of the Council on Chafee, Committee on 

Environmental Quality, vice Kathleen A. Environment and Public Works, 

McGinty, resigned. without printed report. 

* 75 18 John T. Spotila, of New Jersey, to be May 20, 99 Reported by Mr. 

Administrator of the Office of Information and Thompson, Committee on 

Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Governmental Affairs, without 

Budget, vice Sally Katzen. printed report. 

*Signifies nominee's commitment to respond to requests to appear and testify before any duly constituted committee of the Senate 
4 

NOMINATIONS 

CALENDAR MESSAGE REPORTED 

No. No. NOMINEE, OFFICE, AND PREDECESSOR BY 

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING 

COMMISSION 

* 92 96 Thomas J. Erickson, ofthe District of Columbia, May 26, 99 Reported by Mr. Lugar 

to be a Commissioner of the Commodity Committee on Agriculture, ' 

Futures Trading Commission for the term Nutrition, and Forestry, without 

expiring April13, 2003, vice John E. Tull, Jr., printed report. 

term expired. 

*Signifies nominee's commitment to respond to requests to appear and testify before any duly constituted committee of the Senate 
5 

NOMINATIONS PLACED ON THE SECRETARY'S DESK
#### § 51.60 How will a new concession contract awarded to an existing concessioner treat a leasehold surrender interest obtained under a prior concession contract?

When a concessioner under a leasehold surrender interest concession contract is awarded a new concession contract by the Director, and the new concession contract continues a leasehold surrender interest in related capital improvements, then the concessioner's leasehold surrender interest value (established as of the date of expiration or termination of its prior concession contract) in the related capital improvements will be continued as the initial value (instead of initial construction cost) of the concessioner's leasehold surrender interest under the terms of the new concession contract. No compensation will be due the concessioner for its leasehold surrender interest or otherwise in these circumstances except as provided by this part.