alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
...........;


..... MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT -~... 1800 Washington Boulevard. Baltimore MD 21230 

MDE 410-537-3000 • 1-800-633-6101 

Robert L. Ehrlich, Jr. Richard F. Pecora 

Governor Secretary 

Michael S. Steele 

Lt. Governor JAN	 292003 

Mr. Donald Welsh
 

Regional Administrator (3RAOO)
 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Region III 

1650 Arch Street 

Philadelphia PA 19103-2029 

Dear Mr. Welsh: 

The purpose ofthis letter is to submit copies of State Implementation Plan (SIP) Revision 

# 03-02 concerning transportation conformity amendments adopted on July 12, 1999. The prehearing materials for this action were submitted to EPA for parallel processing on August 4, 

1998 as part ofMaryland's State Implementation Plan (SIP) Revision 98-14. 

This SIP Revision includes amendments to Regulations .02 and .03, new Regulations
 

.04 - .08 and recodification of Regulation .04 to be Regulation .09 under COMAR 26.11.26
 

Conformity.
 

The Notice ofProposed Action for these amendments was published in the Maryland
 

Register on July 31, 1998 and a public hearing was held on September 2, 1998. The action was
 

adopted on July 12, 1999 and became effective on August 9, 1999. All administrative
 

procedures were properly followed throughout the adoption process.
 

If you have any questions concerning this SIP Revision, ple feel free to call me at 

(410) 631-3084 or have amember of your staff call Ms. . DeBiase, Director, Air and
 

Radiation Management Administration, at 63 255.
 

RP:dr 

Enclosures 

cc:	 Judith Katz
 

Ann Marie DeBiase
 

"To~ether We Can Clean Up"
#### Clifford L. Miller, Appellant, *v.*Orlando W. Norcross, Doing Business under the Name of Norcross Brothers, Respondent, Impleaded with Others.

*Miller*v. *JSforci'oss,*126 App. Div. 905, affirmed.

(Argued May 12, 1909;

decided June 1, 1909.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered June 4, 1908, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at Special Term in an action to recover for material alleged to have been furnished.

*Cyrus C. Miller*for appellant.

*Ceorge JJ. D. Foster*and *John C. Wait*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Edwaed T. Babtlett, Haight, Webneb, Willabd Babtlett, Hiscock and Chase, JJ. Absent: Cullen, Ch. J.
SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

ONE HUNDRED SEVENTH CONGRESS 

FIRST SESSION { CONVENEDJANUARY3 2001 

SECOND SESSION { 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Tuesday, July 10, 2001 

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF GARY SISCO, 

SECRETARY OF THE SENATE 

By Michelle Haynes, Executive Clerk 
1 

RESOLUTIONS 

CALENDAR EX. RES REPORTED 

No. No. SUBJECT BY 
2 

TREATIES 

CALENDAR TREATY REPORTED 

No. Doc. No. SUBJECT BY 

I 

I 
3 

NOMINATIONS 

CALENDAR MESSAGE REPORTED 

No. No. NOMINEE, OFFICE, AND PREDECESSOR BY 

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 

* 59 179 Kenneth W. Dam, of Illinois, to be Deputy May 1, 2001 Reported by Mr. 

Secretary of the Treasury, vice Stuart E. Grassley, Committee on Finance, 

Eizenstat, resigned. without printed report. 

* 60 198 Michele A. Davis, of Virginia, to be an Assistant May 1, 2001 Reported by Mr. 

Secretary of the Treasury, vice Michelle Grassley, Committee on Finance, 

Andrews Smith, resigned. without printed report. 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

* 98 343 J. Steven Griles, of Virginia, to be Deputy May 23, 2001 Reported by Mr. 

Secretary of the Interior, vice David J. Hayes, Murkowski, Committee on 

resigned. Energy and Natural Resources, 

without printed report. 

EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT 

* 104 213 John D. Graham, of Massachusetts, to be May 23, 2001 Reported by Mr. 

Administrator of the Office of Information and Thompson, Committee on 

Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Governmental Affairs, without 

Budget, vice John T. Spotila, resigned. printed report. 

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 

* 159 313 James Gurule, ofMichigan, to be Under May 24, 2001 Reported by Mr. 

Secretary of the Treasury for Enforcement, Grassley, Committee on Finance, 

vice James E. Johnson, resigned. without printed report. 

* 161 346 Peter R. Fisher, of New Jersey, to be an Under May 24, 2001 Reported by Mr. 

Secretary of the Treasury, vice Gary Gensler, Grassley, Committee on Finance, 

resigned. without printed report. 

*Signifies nominee's commitment to respond to requests to appear and testify before any duly constituted committee of the Senate 
4 

NOMINATIONS PLACED ON THE SECRETARY'S DESK
§ 1321.61 Advocacy responsibilities of the area agency. ( a ) The area agency shall serve as the public advocate for the development or enhancement of comprehensive and coordinated community-based systems of services in each community throughout and specific to each planning and service area.
( b ) In carrying out this responsibility, the area agency shall: ( 1 ) Monitor, evaluate, and comment on policies, programs, hearings, levies, and community actions which affect older individuals and family caregivers which the area agency considers to be aligned with the interests identified in the Act;
( 2 ) Solicit comments from the public on the needs of older individuals and family caregivers;
( 3 ) Represent the interests of older individuals and family caregivers to local level and executive branch officials, public and private agencies, or organizations;
( 4 ) Consult with and support the State's Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program; and
( 5 ) Coordinate with public and private organizations, including units of general purpose local government to promote new or expanded benefits and opportunities for older individuals and family caregivers.
( c ) Each area agency on aging shall undertake a leadership role in assisting communities throughout the planning and service area to target resources from all appropriate sources to meet the needs of older individuals and family caregivers with greatest economic need and greatest social need, with particular attention to low-income minority individuals. Such activities may include location of services and specialization in the types of services most needed by these groups to meet this requirement. However, the area agency shall not permit a grantee or contractor under this part to employ a means test for services funded under this part.
( d ) No requirement in this section shall be deemed to supersede a prohibition contained in the Federal appropriation on the use of Federal funds to lobby the Congress; or the lobbying provision applicable to private nonprofit agencies and organizations contained in OMB Circular A-122.
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeal of

- )

)

CACI NSS, LLC ) ASBCA No. 63080

)

Under Contract No. FA8823

- 16

- C

- 0004 )

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT : Michael E. Ginsberg, Esq.

J. William Koegel, Jr., Esq.

Counsel

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Arthur M. Taylor, Esq.

DCMA Chief Trial Attorney

Kara M. Klaas, Esq.

Trial Attorney

Defense Contract Management Agency

Chantilly, VA

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice.

Dated: August 19, 2022

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 63080

, Appeal of CACI NSS, LLC

, rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.

Dated: August 22, 2 022 JOHN J. THRASHER

Administrative Judge

Chairman

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

PAULLA K. GATES

- LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
1

Option 1: Basics & Committee Operations

Tuesday, May 16

1:45 p.m. — Webinar Log-in Begins 

2:00 - 4:00 p.m. — Basics for Beginners

• Committee registration and organization

• Contributions limits and prohibitions

• Filing information

• Compliance help 

Wednesday, May 17

12:45 p.m. — Webinar Log-in Begins 

1:00 - 2:30 p.m. — Committee Operations, Part 1

• Redesignations and reattributions

• Volunteer activity and exemptions

• Earmarked contributions

• Joint fundraising

• Reporting scenarios

2:30 - 2:45 p.m. — Break 

2:45 - 4:15 p.m. — Committee Operations, Part 2

• Support from the candidate

• Use of campaign funds

• Staff advances

• Nonfederal vs. federal fundraising

• Reporting scenarios

Option 2: Committee Operations Only

Wednesday, May 17

12:45 p.m. — Webinar Log-in Begins 

1:00 - 2:30 p.m. — Committee Operations, Part 1

• Redesignations and reattributions

• Volunteer activity and exemptions

• Earmarked contributions

• Joint fundraising

• Reporting scenarios

2:30 - 2:45 p.m. — Break 

2:45 - 4:15 p.m. — Committee Operations, Part 2

• Support from the candidate

• Use of campaign funds

• Staff advances

• Nonfederal vs. federal fundraising

• Reporting scenarios

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 2023 WEBINAR SERIES 

Federal Election Commission 

2023 Candidate Committee Webinar

(All times listed are Eastern Time)
# PAC Table 4b
#### Charles D. Austin, appellee, v. William Diffendaffer at al., appellants.

Filed September 26, 1914.

No. 17,801.

1. Trial: Request for Special Findings after Judgment. The refusal of a request for specific findings, when made after the entry of a judgment, is not a ground of reversal.

2. Appeal: Findings: Evidence. A finding of faet on conflicting proofs is final on appeal, when supported by sufficient evidence.

Appeal from the district court for Lancaster county: Albert J. Cornish, Judge.

*Affirmed.*

*F. A. Boehmer ’é*Son, for appellants.

*D. F. Osgood*and *Tibbets & Anderson, contra.*

Rose, J.

This is a suit to recover on eight separate causes of action the sum of $1,066. A jury was waived and the trial court entered judgment in favor of plaintiff for $270. Defendants appeal.

In their brief defendants express the conviction that the judgment was rendered on the eighth cause of action, which they describe in their abstract as follows: “In August and *748September, 1910, at the special instance and request of appellant, appellee prepared 65 acres of ground and planted same in wheat, which services are worth $195, and he also furnished the seed for said ground or ihe value of $65, making a total of $260 in this cause of action.” The answer amounted to a general denial.

It is argued on appeal that the trial court erred in overruling a request for special findings. This request was made after the entry of the judgment. It is clear that in denying the request there was no error.

It is further insisted that the judgment is not supported by the evidence, and that it is contrary to law. The evidence on the issues involving the eighth cause of action is conflicting, but is ample to sustain the finding of the trial court. It does not affirmatively appear that the judgment is contrary to law. On the other hand, it is obviously just. The appeal is not meritorious.

Affirmed.

Letton, J., not sitting.
#### § 910.50 General.

The definitions appearing in this Glossary of Terms are applicable to this part 910 and to the *Square Guidelines.* In addition, definitions appearing in section 1201 of the Zoning Regulations of the District of Columbia are also applicable. Where a conflict between this subpart and section 1201 of the Zoning Regulations arises in terminology or interpretation, this subpart shall be controlling.
NUMBER 13-20-00190-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG

 

SEAN RODRIGUEZ OSBORN, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On appeal from the 216th District Court

of Kerr County, Texas.

ORDER

Before Justices Benavides, Hinojosa, and Silva

Order Per Curiam

Before the Court is appellant's motion for pro se access to the appellate record.

Appellant's counsel filed an Anders brief, and appellant has been unable to examine the 

record in order to file a pro se brief. 

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED the trial court ensure that appellant has the 

opportunity to fully examine the appellate record on or before fifteen (15) days from the 
2

date this order issues, and it is FURTHER ORDERED that the trial court notify this Court 

as to the date upon which the appellate record was made available to appellant. See Kelly 

v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014).

Furthermore, appellant shall have thirty (30) days from the date the appellate

record is first made available to him to file his pro se brief with this Court. The State shall 

have twenty days thereafter to file its response, if any.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed on the

14th day of April, 2021.
# EXHIBIT 32.1

Each of, Edwin L. Adler, Chief
Executive Officer, and James W. Distelrath, Chief Financial Officer, of Clarkston Financial
Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)    
          the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended September 30,
          2005 which this statement accompanies fully complies with the requirements of
          Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2)    
          the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A for the
          quarterly period ended September 30, 2005 fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Clarkston
          Financial Corporation.

Date: February 2, 2006

| |  | /s/ Edwin L. Adler
Edwin L. AdlerChief Executive Officer
/s/ James W. Distelrath
James W. DistelrathChief Financial Officer
| |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- 4734
- 4735
- 4736
- 4737
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001068148
<NAME> PARK-OHIO INDUSTRIES INC./OH
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                             533
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  120,025
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,519
<INVENTORY>                                    192,545
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               331,096
<PP&E>                                         214,812
<DEPRECIATION>                                  91,770
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 642,588
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          117,633
<BONDS>                                        343,324
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     155,336
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   642,588
<SALES>                                        581,822
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               581,822
<CGS>                                          480,546
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  480,546
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              22,826
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,802
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,558
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,244
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,244
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 15

            EXHIBIT (15) LETTER RE: UNAUDITED FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Board of Directors and Shareholders
Park-Ohio Industries, Inc.

     We are aware of the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement (Form S-4 No. 333-83117) of Park-Ohio Industries, Inc. for the
registration of its $200,000,000 senior subordinated notes due 2007 of our
report dated July 20, 1999 relating to the unaudited consolidated interim
financial statements of Park-Ohio Industries, Inc., which are included in its
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1999.

     Pursuant to Rule 436(c) of the Securities Act of 1933 our reports are not a
part of the registration statement prepared or certified by accountants within
the meaning of Section 7 or 11 of the Securities Act of 1933.

                                          /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Cleveland, Ohio
August 11, 1999
SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

ONE HUNDRED SEVENTH CONGRESS 

FIRST SESSION { CONVENEDJANUARY3,2001 

SECOND SESSION { 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Monday, September 10, 2001 

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF JERI THOMSON, 

SECRETARY OF THE SENATE 

By Michelle Haynes, Executive Clerk 
1 

RESOLUTIONS 

CALENDAR Ex.RES REPORTED 

No No SUBJECT BY 
2 

TREATIES 

CALENDAR TREATY REPORTED 

No. Doc. No. SUBJECT BY 
3 

NOMINATIONS 

CALENDAR MESSAGE REPORTED 

No. No. NOMINEE, OFFICE, AND PREDECESSOR BY 

[NEW REPORTS] 

THE JUDICIARY 

360 886 Sharon Prost, of the District of Columbia, to be Sep 6, 2001 Reported by Mr. Leahy, 

United States Circuit Judge for the Federal Committee on the Judiciary, 

Circuit, viceS. Jay Plager, retired. without printed report. 

361 903 Reggie B. Walton, ofthe District of Columbia, to Sep 6, 2001 Reported by Mr. Leahy, 

be United States District Judge for the District Committee on the Judiciary, 

of Columbia, vice Stanley Sporkin, retired. without printed report. 

DEPARTMENT O:F JUSTICE 

362 958 Deborah J. Daniels, oflndiana, to be an Assistant Sep 6, 2001 Reported by Mr. Leahy, 

Attorney General, vice Laurie 0. Robinson, Committee on the Judiciary, 

resigned. without printed report. 

363 960 Richard R. Nedelkoff, of Texas, to be Director of Sep 6, 2001 Reported by Mr. Leahy, 

the Bureau of Justice Assistance, vice Nancy Committee on the Judiciary, 

E. Gist, resigned. without printed report. 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

* 364 822 Michael Parker, of Mississippi, to be an Assistant Sep 6, 2001 Reported by Mr. Levin, 

Secretary of the Army, vice Joseph W. Committee on Armed Services, 

Westphal. without printed report. 

*Signifies nominee's commitment to respond to requests to appear and testify before any duly constituted committee of the Senate 
4 

NOMINATIONS PLACED ON THE SECRETARY'S DESK
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The undersigned, Robert Fraser and William Grossholz of Lions Gate Lighting Corp., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
| (1) | the annual report on Form 10-KSB of Lions Gate Lighting Corp. for the period ended February 28, 2007 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Lions Gate Lighting Corp. |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Dated:  June 13, 2007

/s/ Robert Fraser

Robert Fraser, President and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)

/s/ William Grossholz

William Grossholz

Secretary and Treasurer 

(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Lions Gate Lighting Corp. and will be retained by Lions Gate Lighting Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

In the Matter of 

LRA 932 

Request for Consideration of a Legal 

Question - Elizabeth Crowley for 

^ Congress 

hr! CERTIFICATION 

tn. 

•"HI 

^ I, Shelley E. Garr, recording secretary for the Federal Election Commission executive 

hfl 

Q session on July 09,2013, do hereby certify that the Cominission failed by a vote of 2-3 to 

«"H| conclude that 11 C.F.R. §§ 102.9(e), 110.1(b)(3)(i) and (5) do not permit the redesignation of 

contributions received by an authorized committee for the general election in which a candidate 

does not participate to a candidate's non-federal campaign committee. 

Commissioners Walther and Weintraub voted affirmatively for the motion. 

Commissioners Hunter, McGahn II, and Petersen dissented. 

Attest: 

Date Shelley E. Qz 

Deputy Secretary of the Commission
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 15 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 15

Disapproving the rule submitted by the Department of Commerce relating 
    to ``Procedures Covering Suspension of Liquidation, Duties and 
   Estimated Duties in Accord With Presidential Proclamation 10414''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 16, 2023

 Mr. Scott of Florida (for himself, Mr. Vance, Mr. Hawley, Mr. Rubio, 
  Ms. Murkowski, Mr. Cramer, and Mr. Cotton) introduced the following 
joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                                Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Disapproving the rule submitted by the Department of Commerce relating 
    to ``Procedures Covering Suspension of Liquidation, Duties and 
   Estimated Duties in Accord With Presidential Proclamation 10414''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Department of Commerce relating to ``Procedures 
Covering Suspension of Liquidation, Duties and Estimated Duties in 
Accord With Presidential Proclamation 10414'' (87 Fed. Reg. 56868), and 
such rule shall have no force or effect.
                                 <all>
```