alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 21.1
List of Subsidiaries
 State Or Other Jurisdiction Of
    
    Names Under WhichSubsidiaries Of The Registrant
    
    Incorporation Or Organization
    
    Subsidiaries Do BusinessAccessory Design Group, Inc.
    
    Delaware
    
    Accessory Design Group, Inc.Accessory Design GroupTBAC-Prince Gardner, Inc.
    
    Delaware
    
    TBAC-Prince Gardner, Inc.Prince GardnerH.A. Sheldon Canada, Ltd.
    
    Ontario, Canada
    
    1088258 Ontario, Inc.H.A. Sheldon Canada Ltd.Amity/Rolfs, Inc.
    
    Delaware
    
    Amity/Rolfs, Inc.TBAC General Management Company
    
    Nevada
    
    TBAC General Management CompanyTBAC Investments, Inc.
    
    Nevada
    
    TBAC Investments, Inc.TBAC Investment Trust
    
    Pennsylvania
    
    TBAC Investment TrustTBAC Management Company, L.P.
    
    Delaware
    
    TBAC Management Company, L.P.Tandy Brands Accessories Handbags, Inc.
    
    Delaware
    
    Tandy Brands Accessories Handbags, Inc.Stagg Industries, Inc.
    
    Alabama
    
    Stagg Industries, Inc.TBAC  Torel, Inc.
    
    Delaware
    
    TBAC  Torel, Inc.TBAC  Mass Merchant Quality Control, Inc.
    
    Delaware
    
    TBAC  Mass Merchant Quality Control, Inc.Superior Merchandise Company
    
    Louisiana
    
    Superior Merchandise ETONTBAC  Acquisition, Inc.
    
    Delaware
    
    TBAC  Acquisition, Inc.
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 45648

STATE OF IDAHO

,

Plaintiff

- Respondent

,

v.

GRANT ABEL ULUKOA DA CALIO

,

Defendant

- Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Filed: July 12, 2018

Karel A. Lehrman, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fifth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Twin

Falls County. Hon. Randy J. Stoker , District Judge.

Order relinquishing jurisdiction, affirmed

.

Eric D. Fredericksen, State Appellate Public Defender; Lara E. Anderson , Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming , Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.

________________________________________________

Before GRATTON, Chief Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge; and HUSKEY, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM

Grant Abel Ulukoa Dacalio pled guilty to eluding a peace officer , Idaho Code § 49

-
1404(2)(a) and/or (c) . The district court imposed a unified sentence of five years, with a

minimum period of confinement of thr ee years, and retained jurisdiction

. Dacalio filed an Idaho

Criminal Rule 35 motion, which the district court denied. The district court retained jurisdiction,

and Dacalio was sent to participate in the rider program.

Prior to Dacalio completing his rider, the district court relinquished jurisdiction upon

recommendation of the Idaho Department of Correction. Dacalio appeals, claiming that the

district court erred by relinquishing jurisdiction.2 We note that the decision to place a defendant on probation or whether, instead, to

relinquish jurisdiction over the defendant is a matter within the sound discretion of the district

court and will not be overturned on appeal absent an abuse of that discretion. State v. Hood , 102

Idaho 711, 712, 639 P.2d 9, 10 (1981); State v. Lee , 117 Idaho 203, 205

- 06, 786 P.2d 594, 596

-
97 (Ct. App. 1990). The record in this case shows that the district court properly considered the

information before it and determined that probation was n ot appropriate. We hold that Dacalio

has failed to show that the district court abused its discretion in relinquishing jurisdiction. The

order of the district court relinquishing jurisdiction is affirmed.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, *v.*Louis Levin, Appellant.

*People*v. *Levin,*119 App. Div. 233, affirmed.

(Argued January 12, 1909;

decided January 26, 1909.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered May 25,1907, which affirmed a judgment of the Court of General Sessions of the Peace in the county of New York, rendered upon a verdict convicting the defendant of the crime of grand larceny in the second degree.

*Henry M. Goldfogle*for appellant.

*William Travers*Jerome, *District Attorney (Robert G. Taylor*of counsel) for respondent.

Judgment of conviction affirmed ; no opinion.

ConcurCullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Werner and Hiscook, JJ.
§ 158.151 Expenditures related to Health Information Technology and meaningful use requirements. ( a ) *General requirements.* An issuer may include as activities that improve health care quality such Health Information Technology (HIT) expenses as are required to accomplish the activities allowed in § 158.150 of this subpart and that are designed for use by health plans, health care providers, or enrollees for the electronic creation, maintenance, access, or exchange of health information, as well as those consistent with Medicare and/or Medicaid meaningful use requirements, and which may in whole or in part improve quality of care, or provide the technological infrastructure to enhance current quality improvement or make new quality improvement initiatives possible by doing one or more of the following: ( 1 ) Making incentive payments to health care providers for the adoption of certified electronic health record technologies and their “meaningful use” as defined by HHS to the extent such payments are not included in reimbursement for clinical services as defined in § 158.140 of this subpart;
( 2 ) Implementing systems to track and verify the adoption and meaningful use of certified electronic health records technologies by health care providers, including those not eligible for Medicare and Medicaid incentive payments;
( 3 ) Providing technical assistance to support adoption and meaningful use of certified electronic health records technologies;
( 4 ) Monitoring, measuring, or reporting clinical effectiveness including reporting and analysis of costs related to maintaining accreditation by nationally recognized accrediting organizations such as NCQA or URAC, or costs for public reporting of quality of care, including costs specifically required to make accurate determinations of defined measures (for example, CAHPS surveys or chart review of HEDIS measures and costs for public reporting mandated or encouraged by law.
( 5 ) Tracking whether a specific class of medical interventions or a bundle of related services leads to better patient outcomes.
( 6 ) Advancing the ability of enrollees, providers, issuers or other systems to communicate patient centered clinical or medical information rapidly, accurately and efficiently to determine patient status, avoid harmful drug interactions or direct appropriate care, which may include electronic Health Records accessible by enrollees and appropriate providers to monitor and document an individual patient's medical history and to support care management.
( 7 ) Reformatting, transmitting or reporting data to national or international government-based health organizations for the purposes of identifying or treating specific conditions or controlling the spread of disease.
( 8 ) Provision of electronic health records, patient portals, and tools to facilitate patient self-management.
( b ) [Reserved]
Order entered October 25, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-00738-CR

BARRY LAKEITH GRIGSBY, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 194th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F15-75554-M

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s October 23, 2019 second motion to extend the time to file 

appellant’s brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER appellant’s brief filed on or before 

November 25, 2019. If appellant’s brief is not filed by November 25, 2019, this appeal may be 

abated for the trial court to make findings in accordance with rule of appellate procedure 38.8.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE
§ 1011.16 When will the Presidio Trust refer debts to the Department of Justice? ( a ) *Compromise or suspension or termination of collection activity.* The Presidio Trust will refer debts having a principal balance over $100,000, or such higher amount as authorized by the Attorney General, to the Department of Justice for approval of any compromise of a debt or suspension or termination of collection activity. See the FCCS and § 1011.7 and 1011.8 of this part.
( b ) *Litigation.* The Presidio Trust will promptly refer to the Department of Justice for litigation delinquent debts on which aggressive collection activity has been taken in accordance with this part that the Presidio Trust determines should not be compromised, and on which collection activity should not be suspended or terminated. The Presidio Trust may authorize the FMS to refer to the Department of Justice for litigation those delinquent debts that have been transferred to the FMS under § 1011.9 of this part.
§ 9.86 Spill control and emergency preparedness plan. You must submit the following information about your spill control and emergency preparedness plan. You may use a spill prevention control and countermeasure (SPCC) plan prepared under 40 CFR part 112 if the plan includes all of the information required by this section. You must submit: ( a ) A list of names, addresses, and telephone numbers of persons that the Superintendent can contact in the event of a spill, fire, or accident, including the order in which the persons should be contacted;
( b ) Your reporting procedures in the event of a spill, fire, or accident;
( c ) Identification of contaminating or toxic substances expected to be used within your area of operations;
( d ) Identification of abnormal pressure, temperature, toxic gases or substances, or other hazardous conditions expected to be encountered during operations;
( e ) Measures (*e.g.,* procedures, facility design, equipment) to minimize risks to human health and safety and the environment;
( f ) Steps to prevent conditions creating fire hazards in the vicinity of well locations and lease tanks;
( g ) List of equipment and methods for containment and cleanup of contaminating substances, including a list of the equipment to be maintained on site as well as a list of equipment to be available from local contractors;
( h ) A storm water drainage plan and actions intended to mitigate storm water runoff;
( i ) Safety data sheets for each material expected to be used or encountered during operations, including quantities expected to be maintained at your area of operations;
( j ) A description of the emergency actions you will take in the event of accidents causing human injury; and
( k ) Contingency plans for relevant conditions and emergencies other than spills, based on the particular geographic area, such as hurricanes, flooding, tornadoes, or earthquakes.
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2012-0340 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2011-SW-073-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

 Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

ONE HUNDRED THIRD CONGRESS 

FIRST SESSION { 

SECOND SESSION { 

Convened January 5, 1993 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Thursday, January 21, 1993 

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF WALTER J. STEWART, 

SECRETARY OF THE SENATE 

By Gerald A. Hackett, Executive Clerk 
1 
Calendar Message 

Nio. No. 

1 76-6 

2 76-8 

3 76-9 

4 76··10 

5 76-12 

2 

NOMINATIONS 

Nominee, Off ice, And Predecessor 

[NEW REPORTS] 

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Mike Espy, of Mississippi, to be Secretary 

of Agriculture. 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Robert B. Reich. of Massachusetts, to be 

Secretary of Labor. 

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN 

SERVICES 

Donna E. Shalala, of Wisconsin. to be 

Secretary of Health and Human Services. 

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND 

URBAN DEVELOPMENT 

Henry G. Cisneros, of Texas. to be 

Secretary of Housing and Urban 

Development. 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

Hazel Rollins O'Leary, of Minnesota, to be 

Secretary of Energy. 

Reported 

Bv 

Jan 20. 93 Placed on Senate 

Executive Calendar. 

Calendar No. 1. 

Jan 20, 93 Placed on Senate 

Executive Calendar. 

Calendar No. 2. 

Jan 20, 93 Placed on Senate 

Executive Calendar. 

Calendar No. 3. 

Jan 20, 93 Placed ·on Senate 

Executive Calendar. 

Calendar No. 4. 

Jan 20, 93 Placed on Senate 

Executive Calendar. 

Calendar No. 5. 
Calendar Message 

No. No. 

6 76-13 

7 76-14 

8 76-16 

9 76-18 

10 77-1 

11 77-4 

3 

Nominee. Off ice, And Predecessor 

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 

Richard W. Riley, of South Carolina, to be 

Secretary of Education. 

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS 

Jesse Brown, of the District of Columbia, 

to be Secretary of Veterans Affairs. 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

Carol M. Browner, of Florida. to be 

Administrator of the Environmental 

Protection Agency. 

EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE 

PRESIDENT 

Leon E. Panetta, of California. to be 

Director of the Office of Management and 

Budget. 

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 

Roger Altman, of New York, Lo be Deputy 

Secretary of the Treasury. 

EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE 

PRESIDENT 

Alice Rivlin, of the District of Columbia, 

to be Deputy Director of the Office of 

Mana.e:ement and BUdl!et. 

Reported 

BY 

Jan 20, 93 Placed on Senate 

Executive Calendar. 

Calendar No. 6. 

Jan 20, 93 Placed on Senate 

Executive Calendar. 

Calendar No. 7. 

Jan 20, 93 Placed on Senate 

Executive Calendar. 

Calendar No. 8. 

Jan 20, 93 Placed on Senate 

Executive Calendar. 

Calendar No. 9. 

Jan 20, 93 Placed on Senate 

Executive Calendar. 

Calendar No. 10. 

Jan 20, 93 Placed on Senate 

Executive Calendar. 

Calendar No. 11. 

*Signifies nominee's commitment to respond to requests to appear and testify before any duly 

constituted committee of tfle Senate.
#### § 150.201 State enforcement.

Except as provided in subpart C of this part, each State enforces PHS Act requirements with respect to health insurance issuers that issue, sell, renew, or offer health insurance coverage in the State.

[64 FR 45795, Aug. 20, 1999, as amended at 78 FR 13440, Feb. 27, 2013]
BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

In the Matter of ) 

) A21-02 

Audit Division Recommendation ) 

Memorandum on Weber for Congress ) 

CERTIFICATION 

I, Vicktoria J. Allen, Acting Deputy Secretary of the Federal Election 

Commission, do hereby certify that on July 27, 2022, the Commission decided 

by a vote of 5-0 to approve the Audit Division Recommendation Memorandum 

on Weber for Congress, as recommended in the Memorandum from the Chief 

Compliance Officer and the Audit Division dated July 15, 2022. 

Commissioners Broussard, Cooksey, Dickerson, Trainor, and Weintraub 

voted affirmatively for the decision. Commissioner Walther did not vote. 

July 28, 2022 

Date 

Attest: 

Digitally signed by Vicktoria J Vicktoria J Allen 

Date: 2022.07.28 11:46:38 Allen -04'00' 

Vicktoria J. Allen 

Acting Deputy Secretary of the 

Commission
Strafford,

No. 5277.

#### Community Oil Co. *v.*Michael J. P. Hashem.

Submitted May 5, 1965.

Decided May 24, 1965.

*292
      *Walter A. Calderwood*for the plaintiff, filed no brief.

*Fisher, Parsons, Moran & Temple*for the defendant, filed no brief.

Blandin, J.

The defendant excepted to the findings, rulings and verdict of the Court. Since it appears on the face of the record that the main purpose of the exceptions was to raise the question of whether the defendant might be held personally liable as an agent of an undisclosed principal, we consider that issue. *Eastman*v. *Waisman,*94 N. H. 253. An examination of the transcript discloses that there was sufficient evidence to sustain all the findings of the Court, including those that the plaintiff extended credit to the defendant personally, unaware of the fact that the latter represented an undisclosed principal. Having made these findings, the Court properly ruled as a matter of law that “an agent who contracts in his own name for an undisclosed principal is personally liable.” *Batchelder v. Libbey,*66 N. H. 175; *Hoyt*v. *Horst,*105 N. H. 380, 388; Restate*293ment (Second), Agency, *s.*322; see *Manchester Supply Co.*v. *Dearborn,*90 N. H. 447.

The order is

*Judgment on the verdict.*

All concurred.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 12 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 12

    Disapproving the action of the District of Columbia Council in 
            approving the Revised Criminal Code Act of 2022.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 9, 2023

Mr. Hagerty (for himself, Mr. McConnell, Mr. Barrasso, Mrs. Blackburn, 
Mr. Boozman, Mr. Braun, Mrs. Britt, Mr. Budd, Mrs. Capito, Mr. Cassidy, 
 Ms. Collins, Mr. Cornyn, Mr. Cotton, Mr. Cramer, Mr. Crapo, Mr. Cruz, 
  Mr. Daines, Ms. Ernst, Mrs. Fischer, Mr. Graham, Mr. Grassley, Mr. 
  Hawley, Mr. Hoeven, Mrs. Hyde-Smith, Mr. Johnson, Mr. Kennedy, Mr. 
Lankford, Mr. Lee, Ms. Lummis, Mr. Marshall, Mr. Moran, Mr. Mullin, Mr. 
 Ricketts, Mr. Risch, Mr. Romney, Mr. Rounds, Mr. Rubio, Mr. Schmitt, 
   Mr. Scott of Florida, Mr. Scott of South Carolina, Mr. Thune, Mr. 
     Tillis, Mr. Tuberville, Mr. Vance, Mr. Wicker, and Mr. Young) 
  introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice and 
referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Disapproving the action of the District of Columbia Council in 
            approving the Revised Criminal Code Act of 2022.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the Congress disapproves 
of the action of the District of Columbia Council described as follows: 
The Revised Criminal Code Act of 2022 (D.C. Act 24-789), enacted by the 
District of Columbia Council on January 17, 2023, and transmitted to 
Congress pursuant to section 602(c)(1) of the District of Columbia Home 
Rule Act on February 1, 2023.
                                 <all>
```
ATTACHMENT HEADER SHEET

Attachment Number 003

Attachment Name

CAS RN 73361-29-2 Chemical Structure / Identity and Polymeric Properties

Associated PMN Section Number

Pt.I, Sec.B, 2e.

Contains CBI

Report Number

 Sanitized Version
All CBI has been removed
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk November 21, 2011

t1114 

# Order

November 21, 2011

143511-2 & (71)

JOHN H. BULTEMA, II, and DEBORAH H. BULTEMA, Plaintiffs/Counter-DefendantsAppellants/Cross-Appellees,

v SC: 143511 COA: 296727 Muskegon CC: 07-045462-CB STEVEN W. ONGERT and KATHY D. ONGERT, Defendants/Counter-PlaintiffsAppellees/Cross-Appellants.

________________ _______________ __________/

STEVEN W. ONGERT and KATHY D. ONGERT, Plaintiffs-Appellees, Cross-Appellants,

v SC: 143512 COA: 296728 Muskegon CC: 07-045541-CB JOHN H. BULTEMA, II, and DEBORAH H. BULTEMA, Defendants-Appellants, Cross-Appellees.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 23, 2011 judgment of the Court of Appeals and the application for leave to appeal as crossappellant are considered, and they are DENI ED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/LPS73882 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Atlas Energy Resources, LLC (the “Company”)
      on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Edward E. Cohen,
      Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/
      Edward E. Cohen


Edward
      E.
      Cohen


Chairman
      and Chief Executive Officer


March
      6,
      2008
Exhibit 32.1
 
 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 In connection with the quarterly report of MetroCorp Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, George M. Lee, Executive Vice Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and operating results of the Company.
 
 /s/ George M. Lee

George M. Lee

Executive Vice Chairman, President andChief Executive Officer
 November 8, 2010