alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
PUBLIC LAW 109–256—AUG. 1, 2006 120 STAT. 659

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 4101 (S. 2722):

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 152 (2006):

May 2, considered and passed House.

July 20, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 109–256

109th Congress

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 170 East

Main Street in Patchogue, New York, as the ‘‘Lieutenant Michael P. Murphy

Post Office Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The facility of the United States Postal Service located at

170 East Main Street in Patchogue, New York, shall be known

and designated as the ‘‘Lieutenant Michael P. Murphy Post Office

Building’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the facility referred to

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Lieutenant

Michael P. Murphy Post Office Building’’.

Approved August 1, 2006.

Aug. 1, 2006

[H.R. 4101]
Exhibit  31.1

I,  H.  Douglas  Saathoff,  certify  that:

1.  I  have  reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Nighthawk Systems,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material  fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made,  in  light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading  with  respect  to  the  period  covered  by  this  report;

3.  Based  on  my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer  as  of,  and  for,  the  periods  presented  in  this  report;

4.  I  am  responsible  for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures  (as  defined  in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
small  business  issuer  and  have:

a)  designed  such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls  and  procedures  to  be  designed under my supervision, to ensure that
material  information  relating  to  the  small  business  issuer, including its
consolidated  subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities,
particularly  during  the  period  in  which  this report is being prepared; and

b)  evaluated  the  effectiveness  of  the  small  business  issuer's disclosure
controls  and  procedures  and presented in this report my conclusions about the
effectiveness  of  the  disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period  covered  by  this  report  based  on  such  evaluation;  and

c)  disclosed  in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control  over  financial  reporting  that  occurred  during  the  small business
issuer's  most  recent  fiscal  quarter  that  has  materially  affected,  or is
reasonably  likely  to  materially  affect, the small business issuer's internal
control  over  financial  reporting;  and

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial  reporting,  to  the  small  business  issuer's auditors and the audit
committee  of  the  small  business  issuer's  board  of  directors  (or persons
performing  the  equivalent  functions):

a)  all  significant  deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses  in  the design or
operation  of  internal  control  over  financial reporting which are reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  small  business  issuer's ability to record,
process,  summarize  and  report  financial  information;  and

b)  any  fraud,  whether  or  not  material,  that  involves management or other
employees  who  have  a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
controls  over  financial  reporting.



Date:  August  22,  2005        By:  /s/  H.  Douglas  Saathoff
                                     ----------------------------
                                     H.  Douglas  Saathoff,
                                     Chief  Executive  Officer
# Congressional Candidate Table6c

&"Arial,Bold"&10&KFF0000This table was generated on 5/8/20.
§ 1611.6 Representation of groups. ( a ) A recipient may provide legal assistance to a group, corporation, association or other entity if it provides information showing that it lacks, and has no practical means of obtaining, funds to retain private counsel and either: ( 1 ) The group, or for a non-membership group the organizing or operating body of the group, is primarily composed of individuals who would be financially eligible for LSC-funded legal assistance; or
( 2 ) The group has as a principal activity the delivery of services to those persons in the community who would be financially eligible for LSC-funded legal assistance and the legal assistance sought relates to such activity.
( b ) ( 1 ) In order to make a determination that a group, corporation, association or other entity is eligible for legal services as required by paragraph (a) of this section, a recipient shall consider the resources available to the group, such as the group's income and income prospects, assets and obligations and either: ( i ) For a group primarily composed of individuals who would be financially eligible for LSC-funded legal assistance, whether the financial or other socioeconomic characteristics of the persons comprising the group are consistent with those of persons who are financially eligible for LSC-funded legal assistance; or
( ii ) For a group having as a principal activity the delivery of services to those persons in the community who would be financially eligible for LSC-funded legal assistance, whether the financial or other socioeconomic characteristics of the persons served by the group are consistent with those of persons who are financially eligible for LSC-funded legal assistance and the assistance sought relates to such activity of the group.
( 2 ) A recipient shall collect information that reasonably demonstrates that the group, corporation, association or other entity meets the eligibility criteria set forth herein.
( c ) The eligibility requirements set forth herein apply only to legal assistance supported by funds from LSC, provided that any legal assistance provided by a recipient, regardless of the source of funds supporting the assistance, must be otherwise permissible under applicable law and regulation.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Prosperity Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2007 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David Zalman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and operating results of the Company.
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|/s/ David Zalman                                 
|David Zalman Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

August 9, 2007
§ 1008.8 Government contracts. ( a ) *Required contract provisions.* When a contract provides for the operation by or on behalf of the Presidio Trust of a system of records to accomplish a Presidio Trust function, the contract shall, consistent with the Presidio Trust's authority, cause the requirements of 5 U.S.C. 552a and the regulations contained in this part to be applied to such system.
( b ) *System manager.* A regular employee of the Presidio Trust will be the manager for a system of records operated by a contractor.
#### § 1602.1 Purpose.

This part contains the rules and procedures the Legal Services Corporation (LSC) follows in making records available to the public under the Freedom of Information Act.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                        223,367
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               223,367
<CGS>                                          162,223
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  170,470
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                49,170
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,842
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    818
<INCOME-TAX>                                       296
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                522
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       522
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.07
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.22

                             ATRIUM COMPANIES, INC.
                            1341 W. MOCKINGBIRD LANE
                                   SUITE 1200W
                               DALLAS, TEXAS 75247



                                October 25, 2000



John Ellison, Jr.
The Ellison Company, Inc.
Suite 406
706 Green Valley Road
Greensboro, North Carolina  27408


Dear John:

         Upon the closing of the proposed acquisition by Atrium Companies, Inc.
("Atrium") of the assets of The Ellison Company Windows and Doors division and
the capital stock of Ellison Extrusion Systems, Inc., Atrium will procure
decreasing term life insurance on your life and pay the premiums in connection
therewith.

                                          Very truly yours,

                                          ATRIUM COMPANIES, INC.



                                          By:  __________________________
                                               Jeff L. Hull, President
Order entered April 4, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-00214-CV

SAN SABA PECAN, LP, Appellant

V.

GIVE AND GO PREPARED FOODS CORP, Appellee

On Appeal from the 101st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. C-17-13535

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s March 29, 2019 unopposed motion for leave to file an 

amended brief, which is attached. We GRANT the motion, STRIKE the brief filed March 22, 

2019, and ORDER appellant to file the amended brief no later than April 8, 2019.

Appellee shall file its brief within twenty days of the filing of appellant’s amended brief.

/s/ ERIN A. NOWELL 

JUSTICE
§ 155.535 Informal resolution and hearing requirements. ( a ) *Informal resolution.* The HHS appeals process will provide an opportunity for informal resolution and a hearing in accordance with the requirements of this section. A State Exchange appeals entity may also provide an informal resolution process prior to a hearing. Any information resolution process must meet the following requirements: ( 1 ) The process complies with the scope of review specified in paragraph (e) of this section;
( 2 ) The appellant's right to a hearing is preserved in any case in which the appellant remains dissatisfied with the outcome of the informal resolution process;
( 3 ) If the appeal advances to hearing, the appellant is not asked to provide duplicative information or documentation that he or she previously provided during the application or informal resolution process; and
( 4 ) If the appeal does not advance to hearing, the informal resolution decision is final and binding.
( b ) *Notice of hearing.* When a hearing is scheduled, the appeals entity must send written notice to the appellant and the appellant's authorized representative, if any, of the date, time, and location or format of the hearing no later than 15 days prior to the hearing date unless— ( 1 ) The appellant requests an earlier hearing date; or
( 2 ) A hearing date sooner than 15 days is necessary to process an expedited appeal, as described in § 155.540(a), and the appeals entity has contacted the appellant to schedule a hearing on a mutually agreed upon date, time, and location or format.
( c ) *Conducting the hearing.* All hearings under this subpart must be conducted— ( 1 ) At a reasonable date, time, and location or format;
( 2 ) After notice of the hearing, pursuant to paragraph (b) of this section;
( 3 ) As an evidentiary hearing, consistent with paragraph (e) of this section; and
( 4 ) By one or more impartial officials who have not been directly involved in the eligibility determination or any prior Exchange appeal decisions in the same matter.
( d ) *Procedural rights of an appellant.* The appeals entity must provide the appellant with the opportunity to— ( 1 ) Review his or her appeal record, including all documents and records to be used by the appeals entity at the hearing, at a reasonable time before the date of the hearing as well as during the hearing;
( 2 ) Bring witnesses to testify;
( 3 ) Establish all relevant facts and circumstances;
( 4 ) Present an argument without undue interference; and
( 5 ) Question or refute any testimony or evidence, including the opportunity to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses.
( e ) *Information and evidence to be considered.* The appeals entity must consider the information used to determine the appellant's eligibility as well as any additional relevant evidence presented during the course of the appeals process, including at the hearing.
( f ) *Standard of review.* The appeals entity will review the appeal *de novo* and will consider all relevant facts and evidence adduced during the appeals process.
[78 FR 54136, Aug. 30, 2013, as amended at 81 FR 12344, Mar. 8, 2016]
#### § 271.5 [Reserved]
§ 1357.32 State fiscal requirements (title IV-B, subpart 2, family preservation and family support services). ( a ) *Scope.* The requirements of this section apply to all funds allocated to States under title IV-B, subpart 2, of the Act.
( b ) *Allotments.* The annual allotment to each State shall be made in accordance with section 433 of the Act.
( c ) *Payments.* Payments to each State will be made in accordance with section 434 of the Act.
( d ) *Matching or cost sharing.* Funds used to provide services in FY 1994 and in subsequent years will be federally reimbursed at 75 percent of allowable expenditures. (This is the same Federal financial participation rate as title IV-B, subpart 1.) Federal funds, however, will not exceed the amount of the State's allotment. ( 1 ) The State's contribution may be in cash, donated funds, and non-public third party in-kind contributions.
( 2 ) Except as provided by Federal statute, other Federal funds may not be used to meet the matching requirement.
( e ) *Prohibition against purchase or construction of facilities.* Funds awarded under title IV-B may not be used for the purchase or construction of facilities.
( f ) *Maintenance of effort.* States may not use the Federal funds under title IV-B, subpart 2, to supplant Federal or non-Federal funds for existing family preservation and family support services. For the purpose of implementing this requirement, “non-Federal funds” means State funds. ACF will collect information annually from each State on expenditures for family support and family preservation using the State fiscal year 1992 as the base year.
( g ) *Time limits on expenditures.* Funds must be expended by September 30 of the fiscal year following the fiscal year in which the funds were awarded.
( h ) *Administrative costs.* ( 1 ) States claiming Federal financial participation for services provided in FY 1994 and subsequent years may not claim more than 10 percent of expenditures under subpart 2 for administrative costs. There is no limit on the percentage of administrative costs which may be reported as State match.
( 2 ) For the purposes of title IV-B, subpart 2, “administrative costs” are costs of auxiliary functions as identified through as agency's accounting system which are: ( i ) Allocable (in accordance with the agency's approved cost allocation plan) to the title IV-B, subpart 2 program cost centers;
( ii ) necessary to sustain the direct effort involved in administering the State plan for title IV-B, subpart 2, or an activity providing service to the program: and
( iii ) centralized in the grantee department or in some other agency, and may include but are not limited to the following: Procurement; payroll; personnel functions; management, maintenance and operation of space and property; data processing and computer services; accounting; budgeting; auditing.
( 3 ) Program costs are costs, other than administrative costs, incurred in connection with developing and implementing the CFSP (e.g., delivery of services, planning, consultation, coordination, training, quality assurance measures, data collection, evaluations, supervision).
[61 FR 58661, Nov. 18, 1996]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE REVIEWED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF CREDIT CONCEPTS, INC. AS OF AND FOR THE THREE-MONTH
PERIOD ENDED OCTOBER 31, 2000.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-2000
<CASH>                                          79,350
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,804,727
<ALLOWANCES>                                   370,174
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          53,217
<DEPRECIATION>                                  21,304
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,667,505
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      4,431,697
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       150,000
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,308
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,667,505
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               385,194
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               130,037
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                50,400
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             148,415
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 56,342
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             56,342
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    56,342
<EPS-BASIC>                                   187.81
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   187.81


</TABLE>
UASolutions Group, Inc. www.uasolutionsgroup.com

2518 Auburn Drive, Cocoa, FL 32926 ( 321 )

- 261

- 2547
uasolutionsgroup@uasolutionsgroup.com December 14 , 2015

U. S. Department of Transportation
Federal Aviation Administration Office of Rulemaking, Bldg. 10A 800 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20591

RE: Summary Grant for Spoke Enterprise, LLC Exemption Request Under
Section 333 of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Modernization and
Reform Act of 2012 , 4 9 U.S.C. § 44701(f), and 14 C.F.R. Part 11

Dear Sir or M adam:

Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA)

, 49 U.S.C. § 44701(f), and 14 C.F.R. Part 11, Spoke Enterprise, LLC, an operator of Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems (“sUAS”) equipped to conduct full service photography and

v ideography

, seeks exemption f rom the following listed Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) to allow commercial operation of the previously approved Yuneec Typhoon G, Yuneec Tornado H920, Leptron RDASS, and the Leptron Avenger within the National Airspace System (NAS) for controlled, low

- risk, aerial video and photography, aerial mapping and surv ey, precision agriculture survey and analysis, and real estate over certain areas of the United States, conducted within and under the conditions outlined herein, or as may be established by the FAA, as required by Section 333 requirements.

Spoke Enterpr ise, LLC in the accompanying petition, seeks exemption from the requirements of 14 C.F.R. §§ 45.27(a), 61.113(a) and (b), 91.7(a), 91.105, 91.119(c),

91.121

, 91.151(b)

, 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) and ( 2 ),and 91.417(a) and (b)

. Spoke Enterprise, LLC has requested that the FAA not request public comment on its petition because it would not set a ny precedent and because the relief requested is

identical to numerous exemptions granted previously by the FAA . 14 C.F.R. § 11.87.

In a ddition

, Spoke Enterprise, LLC will be utilizing the pr oven technologies the FAA has already accepted and approved in numerous other approved exemptions. Combined, th e

comp rehensive Section 333 Exemption and the approvals the FAA has already given to

the se chosen products and th e technology, should provide the support necessary to the

FAA for a S ummary G rant of Spoke Enterprise, LLC ’s Section 333 Petition and expediteUASolutions Group, Inc. www.uasolutionsgroup.com

2518 Auburn Drive, Cocoa, FL 32926 ( 321 )

- 261

- 2547
uasolutionsgroup@uasolutionsgroup.com the process.

Kelly J. Neubecker
CEO UASolutions Group, Inc.