alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          40,504
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,694
<ALLOWANCES>                                       656
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                54,070
<PP&E>                                           7,299
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,705
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 113,472
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,342
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              515
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            38
<OTHER-SE>                                      99,577
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   113,472
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,236
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                24,484
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   144
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  17
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (17,051)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (17,101)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.56)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
•

•

•

Section I

Section II

Section III

Section IV

Section V

Section VI

Section VII

Washington State Department of Ecology

1998 Revision Authorization Application

for

Rules Adopted by the State in

1993 and 1995

Program Description

Memorandum ofAgreement (MOA)

Attorney General's Statement

Checklists

• RCRA Revision Checklists

• Base Program Statutory Checklist

• HSWA Statutory Checklist

Statutes and Regulations

• Dangerous Waste Regulations Chapter 173-303 WAC,

February 1998

• Administrative Procedure Act Chapter 34.05 RCW, 1997

• Disclosure, Campaign Finances Lobbying, Records Chapter

42.17 RCW, 1997

• Department ofEcology Chapter 43.21A RCW, 1997

• Environmental Hearings Office Pollution Control Hearings

Board Chapter 43.21B RCW; 1997

• Hazardous Waste Management Chapter 70.105 RCW, 1997

• Hazardous Waste Cleanup Model Toxic Control Act Chapter

70.105D RCW, 1997

Comments and Responses from Proposed Rules

• October 1993

• October 1995

Forms and Guidance

• Hazardous Waste and Toxics Reduction Program Compliance

Assurance (Enforcement) Policy, June 15, 1997

• Guidance for Clean Closure of Dangerous Waste Facilities,

August 1994

• Part A Dangerous Waste Permit Forms (Forms 1 and 3), July

1997
•

•

•

Section VIII

Section IX

Reporting Forms and Notification

• Dangerous Waste Annual Report Book 1- Fonns and

Instructions, December 1997

• Dangerous Waste Annual Report Book 2- Guidebook and

Codes, December 1997

• Notification ofDangerous Waste Activities Form 2, January

1996

Test Methods

• Biological Testing Methods 80-12 for the Designation of

Dangerous Waste, April 1997

• Chemical Testing Methods for Designating Dangerous Waste,

February 1998
§ 153.100 State notice of benefit and payment parameters. ( a ) *General requirement for reinsurance.* A State establishing a reinsurance program must issue an annual notice of benefit and payment parameters specific to that State if that State elects to: ( 1 ) Modify the data requirements for health insurance issuers to receive reinsurance payments from those specified in the annual HHS notice of benefit and payment parameters for the applicable benefit year;
( 2 ) Collect additional reinsurance contributions under § 153.220(d)(1) or use additional funds for reinsurance payments under § 153.220(d)(2); or
( 3 ) Use more than one applicable reinsurance entity; or
( b ) *Risk adjustment requirements.* A State operating a risk adjustment program must issue an annual notice of benefit and payment parameters specific to that State setting forth the risk adjustment methodology and data validation standards it will use.
( c ) *State notice deadlines.* If a State is required to publish an annual State notice of benefit and payment parameters for a particular benefit year, it must do so by the later of March 1 of the calendar year prior to the applicable benefit year, or by the 30th day following the publication of the final HHS notice of benefit and payment parameters for that benefit year.
( d ) *State failure to publish notice.* Any State establishing a reinsurance program or operating a risk adjustment program that fails to publish a State notice of benefit and payment parameters within the period specified in paragraph (c) of this section must— ( 1 ) Adhere to the data requirements for health insurance issuers to receive reinsurance payments that are specified in the annual HHS notice of benefit and payment parameters for the applicable benefit year;
( 2 ) Forgo the collection of additional reinsurance contributions under § 153.220(d)(1) and the use of additional funds for reinsurance payments under § 153.220(d)(2);
( 3 ) Forgo the use of more than one applicable reinsurance entity;
( 4 ) Adhere to the risk adjustment methodology and data validation standards published in the annual HHS notice of benefit and payment parameters for use by HHS when operating risk adjustment on behalf of a State.
[77 FR 17245, Mar. 23, 2012, as amended at 78 FR 15525, Mar. 11, 2013; 80 FR 10862, Feb. 27, 2015]
§ 812.170 Compliance procedures. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, this section applies to all allegations of discrimination on the basis of handicap in programs or activities conducted by the agency.
( b ) The agency shall process complaints alleging violations of section 504 with respect to employment according to the procedures established by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in 29 CFR part 1613 pursuant to section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 791).
( c ) The General Counsel shall be responsible for coordinating implementation of this section. Complaints may be sent to the General Counsel, Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20004.
( d ) The agency shall accept and investigate all complete complaints for which it has jurisdiction. All complete complaints must be filed within 180 days of the alleged act of discrimination. The agency may extend this time period for good cause.
( e ) If the agency receives a complaint over which it does not have jurisdiction, it shall promptly notify the complainant and shall make reasonable efforts to refer the complaint to the appropriate government entity.
( f ) The agency shall notify the Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board upon receipt of any complaint alleging that a building or facility that is subject to the Architectural Barriers Act of 1968, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4151-4157), or section 502 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended (29 U.S.C. 792), is not readily accessible to and usable by handicapped persons.
( g ) Within 180 days of the receipt of a complete complaint for which it has jurisdiction, the agency shall notify the complainant of the results of the investigation in a letter containing— ( 1 ) Findings of fact and conclusions of law;
( 2 ) A description of a remedy for each violation found; and
( 3 ) A notice of the right to appeal.
( h ) Appeals of the findings of fact and conclusions of law or remedies must be filed by the complainant within 90 days of receipt from the agency of the letter required by § 812.170(g). The agency may extend this time for good cause.
( i ) Timely appeals shall be accepted and processed by the head of the agency.
( j ) The head of the agency shall notify the complainant of the results of the appeal within 60 days of the receipt of the request. If the head of the agency determines that additional information is needed from the complainant, he or she shall have 60 days from the date of receipt of the additional information to make his or her determination on the appeal.
( k ) The time limits cited in paragraphs (g) and (j) of this section may be extended with the permission of the Assistant Attorney General.
( l ) The agency may delegate its authority for conducting complaint investigations to other Federal agencies, except that the authority for making the final determination may not be delegated to another agency.
[51 FR 22896, June 23, 1986, as amended at 51 FR 22893, June 23, 1986]
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

In re: 

LINDA SPARKS

Debtor(s)

Case No. 16-25490

CHAPTER 13 STANDING TRUSTEE’S FINAL REPORT AND ACCOUNT

Tom Vaughn, chapter 13 trustee, submits the following Final Report and Account of the 

administration of the estate pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1302(b)(1). The trustee declares as follows:

1) The case was filed on 08/09/2016.

2) The plan was confirmed on NA .

3) The plan was modified by order after confirmation pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1329 on

NA .

4) The trustee filed action to remedy default by the debtor in performance under the plan 

on NA .

5) The case was transferred on 08/16/2016.

6) Number of months from filing to last payment: 0.

7) Number of months case was pending: 4.

8) Total value of assets abandoned by court order: NA .

9) Total value of assets exempted: NA .

10) Amount of unsecured claims discharged without payment: $0.00.

11) All checks distributed by the trustee relating to this case have cleared the bank.

UST Form 101-13-FR-S (09/01/2009)

Case 16-25490 Doc 30 Filed 12/12/16 Entered 12/12/16 15:04:01 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 3
Receipts:

Total paid by or on behalf of the debtor $0.00

Less amount refunded to debtor $0.00

NET RECEIPTS: $0.00

Expenses of Administration:

Attorney’s Fees Paid Through the Plan $0.00

Court Costs $0.00

Trustee Expenses & Compensation $0.00

Other $0.00

TOTAL EXPENSES OF ADMINISTRATION: $0.00

Attorney fees paid and disclosed by debtor: $0.00

Scheduled Creditors:

Creditor

Name Class

Claim

Scheduled

Claim

Asserted

Claim

Allowed

Int.

Paid

Principal

Paid

Summary of Disbursements to Creditors:

Secured Payments:

Mortgage Ongoing

Mortgage Arrearage

Debt Secured by Vehicle

All Other Secured

TOTAL SECURED:

Priority Unsecured Payments:

Domestic Support Arrearage

Domestic Support Ongoing

All Other Priority

TOTAL PRIORITY:

GENERAL UNSECURED PAYMENTS:

Claim

Allowed

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

Principal

Paid

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

Interest

Paid

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

UST Form 101-13-FR-S (09/01/2009)

Case 16-25490 Doc 30 Filed 12/12/16 Entered 12/12/16 15:04:01 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 3
Disbursements:

Expenses of Administration $0.00

Disbursements to Creditors $0.00

TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS : $0.00

12) The trustee certifies that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 5009, 

the estate has been fully administered, the foregoing summary is true and complete, and all 

administrative matters for which the trustee is responsible have been completed. The trustee 

requests a final decree be entered that discharges the trustee and grants such other relief as may 

be just and proper.

Dated: 12/12/2016

STATEMENT: This Unified Form is associated with an open bankruptcy case, therefore, Paperwork Reduction 

Act exemption 5 C.F.R. § 1320.4(a)(2) applies.

By:/s/ Tom Vaughn

Trustee

UST Form 101-13-FR-S (09/01/2009)

Case 16-25490 Doc 30 Filed 12/12/16 Entered 12/12/16 15:04:01 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 3
§ 1149.36 How are depositions handled? ( a ) Depositions are to be handled in the following manner: ( 1 ) If a motion for deposition is granted, the ALJ must issue a subpoena for the deponent, which may require the deponent to produce documents. The subpoena must specify the time and place at which the deposition will be held.
( 2 ) The party seeking to depose must serve the subpoena in the manner prescribed by § 1149.12.
( 3 ) The deponent may file with the ALJ a motion to quash the subpoena or a motion for a protective order within 10 days of service.
( 4 ) The party seeking to depose must provide for the taking of a verbatim transcript of the deposition, which it must make available to all other parties for inspection and copying.
( b ) Each party must bear its own costs of discovery.
§ 1330.40 Spinal cord injuries program. ( a ) This program provides assistance to establish innovative projects for the delivery, demonstration, and evaluation of comprehensive medical, vocational, independent living, and rehabilitation services to meet the wide range of needs of individuals with spinal cord injuries.
( b ) The agencies and organizations eligible to apply under this program are described in § 1330.2.
#### § 13.1238 Picnicking.

Within the BCDA, picnicking in locations other than the Brooks Camp Visitor Center picnic area, Brooks Campground, Brooks Lake Picnic Area, and a site designated in the employee housing area is prohibited. Food consumption or possession while at the Brooks River is prohibited.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

          - [Transmittal No. 06-58]

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

# ACTION:

 Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 July 1996.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. J. Hurd, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 604-6575.

The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Transmittal 06-58 with attached transmittal and policy justification.

Dated: October 3, 2006.

C.R. Choate,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

      ( print page 59469)          ( print page 59470)          ( print page 59471)          ( print page 59472)          ( print page 59473)    

BILLING CODE 5001-06-M

[FR Doc. 06-8551  Filed 10-6-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
OWENS CORNING 

INSULATING SYSTEMS, LLC

Newark Facility

400 Case Avenue

Newark, Ohio 43055

1.800.GET.PINKTM

www.owenscorning.com

December 21, 2011

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Air Quality and Standards

Sector Policies and Programs Division

Mail Code d242-02

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

Attn: Susan Fairchild

Re: Clean Air Act Section 114(a) Information Request for the Owens Corning Insulating Systems 

dated Oct. 28, 2011

Dear Susan:

Owens Corning is in receipt of the Section 114 Letter referenced above. The Letter is dated 

October 28, 2011. Owens Corning was given 60 days from postmark of the letter to respond with 

a completed questionnaire.

Due to the timing of the request spanning several national holidays and a traditional heavy 

vacation period we have responded as completely as possible within those constraints to meet 

the timing. Forms “A and B” are substantially complete. Supporting documentation as requested 

has been provided as where we have had records to quickly identify it and locate it. Much of the 

supporting documentation requested is well beyond our record retention policy time line for such 

information and is not available. Some staff members who could facilitate potentially locating 

additional information have not been available during the time allowed. If additional supporting 

documentation is located it will be forwarded as it is available. Due to the nature of the 

supporting documentation it is not possible to in the time allowed to provide non-confidential 

versions. 

Thank you 

Michael L. Pettis

ISB Environmental Leader
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-13-00175-CV

IN RE TRANSACTION CLEARING, LLC

and Betty A. AGUILAR

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Delivered and Filed: March 20, 2013

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On March 13, 2013, Relators Transaction Clearing, LLC and Betty A. Aguilar filed a 

petition for writ of mandamus and an emergency motion for temporary relief. In the petition for 

writ of mandamus, Relators complain the trial court abused its discretion in issuing an order on 

January 16, 2013 granting the petition to take the Rule 202 presuit depositions filed by Real 

Parties in Interest Bizteam, LLC, Business Asst, LLC, and United Prosolve, LLC. See TEX. R.

CIV. P. 202.1, et seq.

One of the grounds asserted by Relators in the petition for writ of mandamus is that the 

claims on which discovery is sought are now the subject of pending arbitration proceedings. The 

 1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2012-CI-18963, styled In re Bizteam, LLC, Business Asst, LLC, and 

United Prosolve, LLC, pending in the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Larry Noll 

presiding. However, the order complained of was signed by the Honorable Michael Mery, presiding judge of the 

37th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas. 
04-13-00175-CV

- 2 -

record indicates the hearing on the presuit depositions was conducted on January 11, 2013, at 

which time the trial court made the oral ruling granting the depositions. A written order was 

signed by the trial court on January 16, 2013. In their petition, Relators indicate that on January 

14, 2013 Relators filed demands for arbitration and the American Arbitration Association has 

already accepted jurisdiction over the controversies and ordered the parties to proceed with the 

selection of arbitrators. Therefore, Relators contend the pending arbitration precludes the presuit 

deposition from being held. 

However, the record fails to reflect that Relators ever presented this argument to the trial 

court prior to seeking mandamus relief from this court. See Terrazas v. Ramirez, 829 S.W.2d 

712, 723 (Tex. 1991) (orig. proceeding) (holding that as a general rule mandamus is not available 

to compel an action which has not first been demanded and refused). At the time the trial court 

entered its order, there is nothing in the record to indicate Relators had made the trial court aware 

the claims had been submitted to arbitration. Therefore, we conclude it was improper for 

Relators to seek relief from this court without first giving the trial court the opportunity to 

reconsider its ruling on the presuit deposition in light of the now pending arbitration. 

Accordingly, we DENY the petition for writ of mandamus and the emergency motion for 

temporary relief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM
EXHIBIT 31.1
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Richard P. Johnson, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of American TireDistributors, Inc., certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of American TireDistributors, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand we have:
 a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter inthe case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
 a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
Date: May 17, 2004       /s/ RICHARD P. JOHNSON   Richard P. Johnson