alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 155.1510 Data submission. ( a ) *Requirements.* For purposes of the IPPTA, a State-based Exchange must submit the following information in a form and manner specified by HHS: ( 1 ) *Data documentation.* The State-based Exchange must provide to HHS the following data documentation: ( i ) The State-based Exchange's data dictionary including attribute name, data type, allowable values, and description;
( ii ) An entity relationship diagram, which shall include the structure of the data tables and the residing data elements that identify the relationships between the data tables; and
( iii ) Business rules and related calculations.
( 2 ) *Data for processing and testing.* The State-based Exchange must use the pre-testing and assessment data request form, or other method as specified by HHS, to submit to HHS the application data associated with no fewer than 10 tax household identification numbers and the associated policy identification numbers that address scenarios specified by HHS to allow HHS to test all of the pre-testing and assessment processes and procedures.
( b ) *Timing.* The State-based Exchange must submit the information specified in paragraph (a) of this section within the timelines in the pre-testing and assessment plan specified in § 155.1515.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-2111

ORLANDO IRA BROWN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

SUNTRUST BANK,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Anderson. Margaret B. Seymour, Senior District Judge. (8:19-cv-00992-MBS)

Submitted: March 13, 2020 Decided: March 18, 2020

Before MOTZ, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Orlando Brown, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Orlando Ira Brown appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation 

of the magistrate judge and dismissing his civil complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) 

(2018). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm 

for the reasons stated by the district court. See Brown v. SunTrust Bank, No. 8:19-cv00992-MBS (D.S.C. Sept. 20, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Carlos M. Gutierrez [C. 1] 

Ordered, That at 3:00 p.m. on Monday, January 24, 2005, the Senate proceed to executive 

session to consider the nomination of Carlos M. Gutierrez, of Michigan, to be Secretary of 

Commerce; provided further, that there be 2 hours of debate with 1 hour under the control of the 

Chairman of the Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation and 1 hour under control 

of the Senator from North Dakota, Mr. Dorgan. 

Ordered further, That following debate the Senate proceed to a vote on the confirmation of 

the nomination with no intervening action or debate, and that the President be immediately 

notified of the Senate's action. 

Condoleezza Rice [C. 4] 

 

Ordered, That on Tuesday, January 25, 2005, at a time to be determined by the Majority 

Leader, after consultation with the Democratic Leader, the Senate proceed to executive session 

for consideration of the nomination of Condoleezza Rice, of California, to be Secretary of State; 

provided further, that there be 9 hours of debate equally divided between the Majority Leader 

and the Democratic Leader or their designees; provided further, that the debate time under the 

control of the Democratic Leader be divided as follows: 

 Senator Byrd, 1 hour; Senator Boxer, 1 hour; Senator Reed, 30 minutes; Senator 

Durbin, 30 minutes; Senator Kerry, 20 minutes; Senator Levin, 15 minutes; Senator Kennedy, 15 

minutes; Senator Lieberman, 10 minutes; Senator Corzine, 10 minutes; Senator Salazar, 10 

minutes; Senator Feinstein, 10 minutes; and Senator Biden, 20 minutes (from the time of 

Senator Lugar). 

Ordered further, That on Wednesday, January 26, 2005, when the Senate resumes 

consideration of the nomination, there be 4 minutes of debate equally divided between the 

Majority Leader and the Democratic Leader or their designees; provided further, that following 

debate the Senate proceed to a vote on the confirmation on the nomination with no intervening 

action or debate and that following the vote the President be immediately notified of the Senate's 

action. 
RESOLUTIONS

CALENDAR 

NO.

S. RES. 

NO.

SUBJECT 

REPORTED 

BY

1

 
TREATIES

CALENDAR 

NO.

TREATY

DOC. NO.

SUBJECT 

REPORTED 

BY

2

 
* Signifies nominee’s commitment to respond to requests to appear and testify before any duly constituted committee of the Senate 

NOMINATIONS

CALENDAR 

NO.

MESSAGE

NO.

NOMINEE, OFFICE, AND PREDECESSOR REPORTED 

BY

3

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

1 2 Carlos M. Gutierrez, of Michigan, to be Secretary 

of Commerce, vice Donald Louis Evans, 

resigned. 

Jan 06, 2005 Reported by Mr. 

Stevens, Committee on 

Commerce, Science, and 

Transportation, without 

printed report. 

 [NEW REPORTS] 

DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

* 4 8 Condoleezza Rice, of California, to be Secretary of 

State, vice Colin Luther Powell, resigned. 

Jan 20, 2005 Reported by Mr. 

Stevens, Committee on Foreign 

Relations, without printed 

report.
# •

•

• Section I Section II Section 

### III Section IV
Section V

Section VI Section VII 

### Washington State DepartmentofEcology 1998 Revision Authorization Application for Rules Adopted by the State in 1993 and 1995 Program Description Memorandum ofAgreement (MOA) Attorney General's Statement Checklists • RCRA Revision Checklists • Base Program Statutory Checklist • HSWA Statutory Checklist Statutes and Regulations • Dangerous Waste Regulations Chapter 173-303 WAC, February 1998 • Administrative Procedure Act Chapter 34.05 RCW, 1997 • Disclosure, Campaign Finances Lobbying, Records Chapter 42.17 RCW, 1997 • DepartmentofEcology Chapter43.21A RCW, 1997 • Environmental Hearings Office Pollution Control Hearings Board Chapter43.21B RCW; 1997 • Hazardous Waste ManagementChapter 70.105 RCW, 1997 • Hazardous Waste Cleanup Model Toxic Control Act Chapter 70.105D RCW, 1997 Comments and Responses from Proposed Rules • October 1993 • October 1995 Forms and Guidance • Hazardous Waste and Toxics Reduction Program Compliance Assurance (Enforcement) Policy, June 15, 1997 • Guidance for Clean Closure ofDangerous Waste Facilities, August 1994 • Part A Dangerous Waste Permit Forms (Forms 1 and 3), July 1997

# •

•

• Section VIII

Section IX Reporting Forms andNotification • Dangerous Waste Annual Report Book 1- Fonns and Instructions, December 1997 • Dangerous Waste Annual Report Book 2- Guidebook and Codes, December 1997 • Notification ofDangerous Waste Activities Form 2, January 1996 Test Methods • Biological Testing Methods 80-12 for the Designationof Dangerous Waste, April 1997 • Chemical Testing Methods forDesignating Dangerous Waste, February 1998
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

# ACTION:

Announcement of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces the eleventh meeting the American Health Information Community Electronic Health Record Workgroup in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. No. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.).

# DATES:

November 7, 2006, from 1 p.m. to 4 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

Mary C. Switzer Building (330 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20201), Conference Room 4090 (please bring photo ID for entry to a Federal building).

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

*http://www/​hhs.gov/​healthit/​ahic/​ehr_​main.html*.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The workgroup discussion will include a discussion of critical components as well as other topics relating to an electronic health record.

                    The meeting will be available via Web cast at                     *http://www.hhs.gov/​healthit/​ahic/​ehr_​instruct.html*.                

Dated: October 12, 2006.

Judith Sparrow,

Director, American Health Information Community, Office of Programs and Coordination, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology.

[FR Doc. 06-8733  Filed 10-17-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4150-24-M
§ 1621.4 Complaints by clients about manner or quality of legal assistance. ( a ) A recipient shall establish procedures for the review of complaints by clients about the manner or quality of legal assistance that has been rendered by the recipient to the client.
( b ) The procedures shall be designed to foster effective communications between the recipient and the complaining client and, at a minimum, provide: ( 1 ) A method for providing a client, at the time the person is accepted as a client or as soon thereafter as is practical, with adequate notice of the complaint procedures and how to make a complaint;
( 2 ) For prompt consideration of each complaint by the Executive Director or the Executive Director's designee,
( 3 ) An opportunity for the complainant, if the Executive Director or the Executive Director's designee is unable to resolve the matter, to submit an oral or written statement to a grievance committee established by the governing body as required by § 1621.2 of this Part. The procedures shall also: provide that the opportunity to submit an oral statement may be accomplished in person, by teleconference, or through some other reasonable alternative; permit a complainant to be accompanied by another person who may speak on that complainant's behalf; and provide that, upon request of the complainant, the recipient shall transcribe a brief written statement, dictated by the complainant for inclusion in the recipient's complaint file.
( c ) Complaints received from clients about the manner or quality of legal assistance that has been rendered by a private attorney pursuant to the recipient's private attorney involvement program under 45 CFR Part 1614 shall be processed in a manner consistent with its responsibilities under 45 CFR § 1614.3(d)(3) and with applicable state or local rules of professional responsibility.
( d ) A file containing every complaint and a statement of its disposition shall be preserved for examination by LSC. The file shall include any written statement submitted by the complainant or transcribed by the recipient from a complainant's oral statement.
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

____________

No. 18-5136 September Term, 2018

1:16-cv-02255-CRC

Filed On: November 13, 2018 [1759597]

Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in

Washington and Melanie T. Sloan,

 Appellees

v.

Federal Election Commission, 

 Appellee

American Action Network, Inc.,

 Appellant

M A N D A T E

In accordance with the order of September 19, 2018, and pursuant to Federal

Rule of Appellate Procedure 41, this constitutes the formal mandate of this court.

FOR THE COURT:

Mark J. Langer, Clerk

BY: /s/

Ken R. Meadows

Deputy Clerk

Link to the order filed September 19, 2018

USCA Case #18-5136 Document #1759597 Filed: 11/13/2018 Page 1 of 1
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 20

- 00482

- CV
Mary Helen Woods and Robert R. Woods v. Rio Grande Valley Livestock Show, Inc.
On Appeal from the 92nd District Court of Hidalgo County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. C

- 4216

- 18

- A

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed

. The Court orders the appeal DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion

. Each party shall bear their own costs relating to this appeal

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. March 11, 2021
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 33 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. CON. RES. 33

  Authorizing the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for the lying in 
honor of the remains of Ralph Puckett, Jr., the last surviving Medal of 
     Honor recipient for acts performed during the Korean conflict.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 17, 2024

Ms. Ernst (for herself, Mr. Tester, Mr. Warnock, Mr. Cotton, Mr. Kaine, 
  Mr. Blumenthal, Mr. Kelly, Mr. Scott of Florida, Mr. Cruz, and Mr. 
   Manchin) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
                        considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  Authorizing the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for the lying in 
honor of the remains of Ralph Puckett, Jr., the last surviving Medal of 
     Honor recipient for acts performed during the Korean conflict.

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring),

SECTION 1. HONORING THE LAST SURVIVING MEDAL OF HONOR RECIPIENT OF THE 
              KOREAN CONFLICT.

    (a) Use of Rotunda.--In recognition of Army Colonel Ralph Puckett, 
Jr., the last surviving recipient of the Medal of Honor for acts 
performed during the Korean conflict, his remains shall be permitted to 
lie in honor in the rotunda of the Capitol on April 29, 2024, in order 
to honor the Silent Generation and the more than 5,700,000 men and 
women who served in the Armed Forces of the United States during the 
``Forgotten War'' from 1950 to 1953.
    (b) Implementation.--The Architect of the Capitol, under the 
direction of the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of 
the House of Representatives, shall take all necessary steps to carry 
out this section.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 1608.1 Purpose.

This part is designed to insure that the Corporation's resources will be used to provide high quality legal assistance and not to support or promote political activities or interests. The part should be construed and applied so as to further this purpose without infringing upon the constitutional rights of employees or the professional responsibilities of attorneys to their clients.
### SERVE D JUL Y 20 , 201 0

U.S
. DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N

OFFIC EO FHEARING S WASHINGTON , D C
INTH EMATTE RO F SKYWES T AIRLINES , INC
. FA A DOCKE T NO
. CP09NM001 2 (Civi l Penalt y Action ) FA A No
. FAA-2009-097 9 

### PROCEDURA L ORDE R Paragrap h# 2 o f

th e Procedura l Orde r

i s amende da s follows : WHEREFORE , th e partie s b e an dar e hereb y ORDERE D t o adher e t o th e followin g procedura l schedule :

.. . O no r before Novembe r

15 , 2010 , th e partie s shal l conclud e al l discover y including , but

no t limite dto , depositions , documen t production , response s t o productio nrequest s and/o r interrogatories
. I f

th e partie s canno t

resolv e a discovery disput e the y shal l submi t th e disput e t o th e unde r

signe dfo r resolutio n i natimel y manner.. .

[ichar dC
. Goodwi n U.S
. Administrativ e Law Judg e Attachmen t

- Servic e Lis tFA A Docke t No
. CP09NM001 2 (Civi l Penalty Action ) SERVIC ELIS T ORIGINA L& ON ECOP Y Federal Aviatio nAdministratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W
. Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit e 2W1000 ' ON ECOP Y Tod dC
. Emerson , Respondent' s Counse l Director , Governmen t

an dLegal Affair s Sk y Wes t Airline s 44 4 Sout hRive r Roa d St
. George , U T 8479 0 TEL : 435-634-353 0 FAX : 435-634-350 5 Scott R
. Morris , Complainant' s Counse l Attorney , Offic e o f

th e Regiona l Counse l Northwes t

Mountai nRegion , ANM- 7 Federal Aviatio nAdministratio n 160 1 Lin dAvenue , S.W
. Renton , W A 9805 7 TEL : 425-227-141 7 FAX : 425-227-100 7 Th e Honorabl e Richar dC
. Goodwin , Administrativ e Law Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S
. Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E
. Eas t Buildin g Groun dFloor , Roo mEl2-32 0 Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : 202-366-213 9 Attorney-Adviso r 202-366-512 1 Lega l Assistan t FAX : 202-366-753 6

' Servic e wa s b y U.S
. Mail
. Fo

r servic e i n perso n o r b y expedite dcourier , us e th e follovt^in g address : Federa l Aviatio nAdministration, 60

0 Independenc

e Avenue, S.W. , Wilbu

r Wrigh t Building—Suit

e 2W1000 , Washington

, D C 20591 ; Attention : Hearin

g Docke t Clerk , AGC-430
.
#### Southern National Life Realty Corporation, et al. v. Peoples Bank of Bardstown.

(Decided February 5, 1918.)

Appeal from Nelson Circuit Court.

Appeal and Error — Verdict—Sufficiency of Pleadings. — A verdict is not supported by tbe pleadings where a demurrer was sustained to one paragraph of an answer presenting' a defense entirely distinct and separate from defenses presented in the other paragraphs of the answer, upon which issue was joined and submitted to the jury.

NAT W. HALSTEAD, HELM BRUCE, BRUCE & BULLITT and GROVER G. SALES for appellants.

JOHN S. KELLEY, VICTOR L. KELLEY and R. C. CHERRY for appellee.

Response to Pettion for Rehearing by

Judge fir.A-R.TrB;

—Withdrawing affirmance and reversing judgment against Southern National Life Realty Corporation.

Although we held the trial court erroneously sustained a demurrer to the third paragraph of the separate answer of appellant, Southern National Life Realty Corporation, the judgment against it was affirmed in the opinion rendered November 27, 1917, reported in 178 Ky. 80, upon the theory that the error was not prejudicial, and this upon the assumption that the jury had determined, upon the issues submitted to it under the first and second paragraphs of the answer, that the corporation was the principal and not a surety upon the note sued on. In assuming this fact as proven, we were guilty of a palpable error, as the verdict of the jury may have resulted from evidence, none of which was brought up' on appeal, that this defendant was a surety and not the principal, but was nevertheless liable, because it had the authority to bind itself as surety and empowered its president to *114sign its name as surety upon the noté. 7 Am. & Eng. Encyclopedia of Law (2 Ed.), p. 790, sec. b.

As we are unable to say whether the jury found this defendant to be the principal or a surety only upon the note and this fact was in fssue on- the pleadings, it is apparent that we were wrong in our conclusion that the error in sustaining the demurrer to the third paragraph of the answer was not prejudicial. Ky. Central R. Co. v. Fox, 10 Ky. L. R. 399; McCauley v. Elrod, 14 Ky. L. R. 524; Manier v. Meyers, 4 B. Mon. 514; Field v. Dealey, 10 B. Mon. 4; Union Pac. R. Co. v. Field, 137 Fed. 14.

Wherefore, so much of the opinion .rendered herein as affirmed the judgment against the Southern National Life Realty Corporation is withdrawn and the judgment is reversed.
# ........... ; 

### MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT 

# .....**-~** ... 1800 Washington Boulevard. Baltimore MD 21230 

# MDE 410-537-3000 • 1-800-633-6101
Robert L. Ehrlich, Jr. Richard F. Pecora Governor Secretary Michael S. Steele Lt. Governor 

# JAN 292003

Mr. Donald Welsh Regional Administrator (3RAOO) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region III 1650 Arch Street Philadelphia PA 19103-2029 Dear Mr. Welsh: The purpose ofthis letter is to submit copies of State Implementation Plan (SIP) Revision # 03-02 concerning transportation conformity amendments adopted on July 12, 1999. The prehearing materials for this action were submitted to EPA for parallel processing on August 4, 1998 as part ofMaryland's State Implementation Plan (SIP) Revision 98-14. This SIP Revision includes amendments to Regulations .02 and .03, new Regulations .04 - .08 and recodification ofRegulation .04 to be Regulation .09 under COMAR 26.11.26 Conformity. The Notice ofProposed Action for these amendments was published in the Maryland Register on July 31, 1998 and a public hearing was held on September 2, 1998. The action was adopted on July 12, 1999 and became effective on August 9, 1999. All administrative procedures were properly followed throughout the adoption process. If you have any questions concerning this SIP Revision, ple feel free to call me at (410) 631-3084 or have 

# amember of your staff call Ms. . DeBiase, Director, Air and Radiation Management Administration, at 63 255.

RP:dr Enclosures
cc: Judith Katz Ann Marie DeBiase**"To~ether** 

### We Can Clean Up"
Exhibit 99.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Primus
Knowledge Solutions, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael A. Brochu, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                                                      
|------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    MICHAEL A. BROCHU                              
|Michael A. Brochu Chief Executive Officer May 14,
2003
§ 154.101 Basis and scope. ( a ) *Basis.* This part implements section 2794 of the Public Health Service (PHS) Act.
( b ) *Scope.* This part establishes the requirements for health insurance issuers offering health insurance coverage in the small group or individual markets to report information concerning unreasonable rate increases to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). This part further establishes the process by which it will be determined whether the rate increases are unreasonable rate increases as defined in this part.