alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IIA 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. J. RES. 114 

Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed foreign military sale 

to the Government of Israel of certain defense articles and services. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 25, 2024 

Mr. SANDERS introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice 

and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed foreign military sale to the Government of Israel of certain 

defense articles and services. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That the following proposed foreign military sale to the 

4 Government of Israel is prohibited: 

5 (1) The sale of the following defense articles 

6 and services described in Transmittal No. 24–01, 

7 submitted to Congress pursuant to section 36(b)(1) 

8 of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 

9 2776(b)(1)), and published in the Congressional 

10 Record on September 10, 2024: Up to fifty (50) F– 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•SJ 114 IS 

1 15IA aircraft; one hundred twenty (120) F110–GE– 

2 129 engines; ninety (90) Advanced Display Core 

3 Processors II; seventy-five (75) APG–82(V)1 Active 

4 Electronically Scanned Array radars; fifty (50) AN/ 

5 AAQ–13 LANTIRN navigation pods with con6 tainers; three-hundred twenty (320) LAU–128 Ad7 vanced Medium Range Air-to-Air Missile launchers; 

8 twenty-five (25) M61A Vulcan Cannons; and one 

9 hundred eighty (180) Embedded Global Positioning 

10 System/Inertial Navigation System devices with M– 

11 Code. Also included are Cartridge Actuated Devices 

12 and Propellant Actuated Devices; Joint Helmet 

13 Mounted Cueing Systems; APX–119 Identification 

14 Friend or Foe (IFF) systems; KIV–77 Mode 4/5 

15 IFF cryptographic appliques; AN/PYQ–10 Simple 

16 Key Loaders; impulse cartridges, chaff, and flares; 

17 integration and test support and equipment; aircraft 

18 and munitions support and support equipment; se19 cure communications equipment, precision naviga20 tion, and cryptographic devices; classified software 

21 development, delivery, and support; spare parts, 

22 consumables and accessories, and repair and return 

23 support; major and minor modifications, mainte24 nance, and maintenance support; facilities and con25 struction support; transportation and airlift support; 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•SJ 114 IS 

1 classified publications and technical documentation; 

2 personnel training and training equipment; warran3 ties; studies and surveys; U.S. Government and con4 tractor engineering, technical, and logistics support 

5 services; and other related elements of logistics and 

6 program support. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
*No.*5264.

#### J. Hightower *v.*The State.

Opinion delivered June 4, 1887.

Swindling.—Indictment for swindling is insufficient if it fails to allege that the injured party was induced to part with the ownership of the property acquired by the defendant, by means of the false pretenses, etc., alleged in the indictment.

Appeal from the County Court of Parker. Tried below before the Hon. B. L. Richey, County Judge.

This conviction was for misdemeanor swindling, and the penalty imposed was a fine of ten dollars.

*McCall & McCall,*for the appellant.

*W. L. Davidson,*Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Willson, Judge.

An indictment or information for the offense of swindling, to be valid1, must allege that the injured party was induced to part with the ownership of the property acquired by the defendant by means of the false pretenses, etc., stated in said indictment or information. (Mathena v. The State, 15 Texas Ct. App., 473.)

In this case the information contains no such allegation, and is, therefore, substantially defective; wherefore the judgment is reversed and the prosecution is dismissed.

*Reversed and*dismissed.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 985 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 985

 To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to ensure campus access at 
     public institutions of higher education for religious groups.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 27, 2023

 Mr. Lankford (for himself, Mr. Scott of South Carolina, Mr. Scott of 
 Florida, Mr. Risch, Mr. Cruz, Mr. Graham, Mr. Crapo, Mrs. Hyde-Smith, 
   Ms. Ernst, Mr. Cramer, Mr. Hawley, Mr. Tillis, Mrs. Fischer, Mr. 
  Grassley, Mr. Cotton, and Mr. Rubio) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, 
                     Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to ensure campus access at 
     public institutions of higher education for religious groups.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Equal Campus Access Act of 2023''.

SEC. 2. CAMPUS ACCESS FOR RELIGIOUS GROUPS.

    Part B of title I of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 
1011 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following:

``SEC. 124. CAMPUS ACCESS FOR RELIGIOUS GROUPS.

    ``None of the funds made available under this Act may be provided 
to any public institution of higher education that denies to a 
religious student organization any right, benefit, or privilege that is 
otherwise afforded to other student organizations at the institution 
(including full access to the facilities of the institution and 
official recognition of the organization by the institution) because of 
the religious beliefs, practices, speech, leadership standards, or 
standards of conduct of the religious student organization.''.
                                 <all>
```
SENATE OF THE UNITED ST ATES 

ONE HUNDRED SECOND CONGRESS 

Convened January 3, 1991 

FIRST SESSION { 

SECOND SESSION { 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Thursday, June 27, 1991 

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF WALTER J. STEWART, 

SECRETARY OF THE SENATE 

By Gerald A. Hackett, Executive Clerk 
1 

TREATIES 

-

Calendar Treaty Subject Reported 

No. Doc. No. Bv -

1 EX. B., Two Related Protocols to the Convention for Feb 5 91 Reported favorably 

95-1 the Unification of Certain Rules Relating by Mr. Pell, Committee on 

to International Carriage by Air, as Foreign Relations, with a 

Amended (Montreal Aviation Protocols No. 3 resolution of advice and 

and 4). consent to ratification 

with provisos. (Printed 

report--Ex. Rept. 102-1 

together with minority 

views). 

NOMINATIONS 

Calendar Message Nominee. Office, And Predecessor Reported 

No. No. By 

DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

80 139 David Floyd Lambertson, of Kansas, a Career May 7, 91 Mr. Pell, 

Member of the Senior Foreign Service, Committee on Foreign 

Class of Minister-Counselor, to be Relations, without printed 

Ambassador Extraordinary and report. 

Plenipotentiary of the United States of 

America to the Kingdom of Thailand. 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

* 190 316 Nancy Patricia Dorn, of Texas, to be an Jun 19, 91 Mr. Warner, 

Assistant Secretary of the Army, vice Committee on Armed 

Robert W. Page, Sr., resigned. Services, without printed 

report. 

[NEW REPORTS] 
Calendar 

No. 

* 208 

* 209 

Message 

No. 

326 

389 

2 

Nominee, Office, And Predecessor 

OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH 

REVIEW COMMISION 

Velma Montoya, of California, to be a 

Member of the Occupational Safety and 

Health Review Commission for a term 

expiring April 27, 1997. (Reappointment) 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Frances Curtin McNaught, of Virginia, to be 

an Assistant Secretary of Labor, vice 

Kathleen Harrington. 

Reported 

Bv 

Jun 26, ~1 Mr. Kennedy, 

Committee on Labor and 

Human Resources, without 

printed report. 

Do. 

*Signifies nommee's commitment to respond to requests to appear and testify before any duly 

constituted committee of the Senate. 

-
120 STAT. 662 PUBLIC LAW 109–259—AUG. 2, 2006

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 4561:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 152 (2006):

Apr. 5, considered and passed House.

July 20, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 109–259

109th Congress

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 8624 Ferguson

Road in Dallas, Texas, as the ‘‘Francisco ‘Pancho’ Medrano Post Office Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The facility of the United States Postal Service located at

8624 Ferguson Road in Dallas, Texas, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Francisco ‘Pancho’ Medrano Post Office Building’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the facility referred to

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Francisco

‘Pancho’ Medrano Post Office Building’’.

Approved August 2, 2006.

Aug. 2, 2006

[H.R. 4561]
SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

ONE HUNDRED FIRST CONGRESS 

Convened January 3, 1989 

FIRST SESSION { 

SECOND SESSION { 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Thursday, June 8, 1989 

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF WALTER J.STEWART, 

SECRETARY OF THE SENATE 

By Gerald A. Hackett, Executive Clerk 
1 

NOMINATIONS 

Calendar Message Nominee, Office, And Predecessor Reported 

* 

* 

* 

* 

* 

No. No. By 

AMBASSADOR 

112 199 Joseph Verner Reed, of Connecticut, for the May 10, 89 Mr. Pell, 

rank of Ambassador during his tenure of Committee on Foreign 

service as Chief of Protocol for the White Relations, without pnnted 

House. report. 

DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

140 289 Peter F. Secchia, of Michigan, to be May 17, 89 Mr. Pell, 

Ambassador Extraordinary and Committee on Foreign 

Plenipotentiary of the United States of Relations, without pnnted 

America to Italy. report. 

[NEW REPORTS] 

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 

163 371 Bryce L. Harlow, of Virgima, to be a Jun 7, 89 Mr. Bentsen, 

Deputy Under Secretary of the Treasury, Committee on Finance, 

vice John K. Meagher, resigned. without printed report. 

164 307 Kenneth W. Gideon, of Virginia, to be an Do. 

Assistant Secretary of the Treasury, vice 

0. Donaldson Chapoton, resigned. 

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN 

SERVICES 

165 314 Gerald L. Olson, of Minnesota, to be an Do. 

Assistant Secretary of Health and Human 

Services. vice Marv T. Goedde. resimed. 

*Signifies nominee's commitment to respond to requests to appear and testify before any duly 

constituted committee of the Senate.
Case 1:22-cv-02876-CRC Document 6 Filed 01/03/23 Page 1 of 3 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

) 

PALMER, ) 

) 

Plaintiff, ) Civ. No. 22-2876 (CRC) 

) 

v. ) 

) MOTION TO DISMISS 

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION ) 

1050 First Street, NE ) 

Washington, DC 20463, ) 

) 

Defendant. ) 

) 

DEFENDANT FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION’S 

MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION 

Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Federal Election 

Commission (“FEC” or “Commission”) hereby moves for an order dismissing plaintiff Barbara 

W. Palmer’s complaint, which alleges that the Commission’s dismissal of an administrative 

complaint plaintiff previously filed with the agency was contrary to law, pursuant to 52 U.S.C. 

§ 30109(a)(8)(A). Plaintiff has not established Article III standing to bring this suit because she 

has failed to establish a concrete and particularized injury, and therefore her complaint should be 

dismissed pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 

A supporting memorandum and a proposed order accompany this motion. 

Respectfully submitted, 

Lisa J. Stevenson (D.C. Bar No. 457628) Jacob Siler (D.C. Bar No. 1003383) 

Acting General Counsel Assistant General Counsel 

lstevenson@fec.gov jsiler@fec.gov 

Kevin Deeley /s/ Shaina Ward 

Associate General Counsel Shaina Ward (D.C. Bar No. 1002801) 

kdeeley@fec.gov Attorney 

1 
 

Case 1:22-cv-02876-CRC Document 6 Filed 01/03/23 Page 2 of 3 

January 3, 2023 

sward@fec.gov 

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

1050 First Street NE 

Washington, DC 20463 

(202) 694-1650 

2 
 

 

Case 1:22-cv-02876-CRC Document 6 Filed 01/03/23 Page 3 of 3 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I, Shaina Ward, certify that on January 3, 2023, I electronically filed the foregoing 

Motion to Dismiss, Memorandum in Support, Proposed Order and Notices of Appearances for 

Commission Counsel with the Clerk of the United States District Court for the District of 

Columbia by using the Court’s CM/ECF system, and served a copy of the same via email and 

USPS First Class Mail to: 

Plaintiff Barbara W. Palmer 

Pro se 

P.O. Box 1386 

Princeton, TX 75407 

bpalmer.txag@gmail.com 

 /s/ Shaina Ward 

Shaina Ward (D.C. Bar No. 1002801) 

Attorney 

3
<PAGE>

                                                                 EXHIBIT 10.15


                             MASSEY ENERGY COMPANY
                       DEFERRED DIRECTORS' FEES PROGRAM
                         (Effective November 30, 2000)


PURPOSE
-------

To provide non-employee directors of Massey Energy Company with a means of
minimizing their current tax burden, while providing funds for expenses
subsequent to retirement.

ELIGIBILITY
-----------

Non-employee directors of Massey Energy Company entitled to directors' fees.

LIMITATIONS
-----------

The amount of directors' fees for meetings in any calendar year to be deferred
must be specified by the director in writing to Massey Energy Company no later
than December 31 of the prior calendar year, either as a fixed dollar amount or
as a percentage of (i) such fees or (ii) the retainer portion or (iii) the
meeting portion of such fees.  The amount or percentage so specified is
irrevocable for that calendar year, and will be effective for all subsequent
calendar years unless and until a new amount or percentage is similarly
specified to be effective prospectively.  The amount so deferred is an offset
against, and in any event cannot exceed the amount of, the directors' fees, if
any, for that calendar year otherwise payable to the director.
<PAGE>

ADJUSTMENT FACTOR
-----------------

Amounts deferred under this Program will be subject to an Adjustment Factor in
accordance with the provisions of the Deferred Directors' Fees Program Financial
Procedure, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof.

PAYMENT
-------

Payment of amounts deferred under this Program will be made in accordance with
the provisions of said Deferred Directors' Fees Program Financial Procedure.

CLAIMS PROCEDURE
----------------

A committee of the Board of Directors of Massey Energy Corporation (the
"Committee") shall be designated to establish and maintain procedures for the
filing of claims for benefits under this Program and for the review of the
denial of any such claims and said Committee is hereby designated as the
fiduciary of this Program to which appeals of claim denials shall be submitted
for review.

                                       2
ATTACHMENT D

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO

AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT

INCREMENTAL COST

- EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS OF

PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO RULE 67. 1 1

– WOOD PRODUCTS

COATING OPERATIONS

Health and Safety Code Section 40920.6(a) requires air districts to identify one or more potential control options that achieve at least the same benefit as the proposed rule,

assess the cost

- effectiveness of those options, calculate the incremental cost

effectiveness of each i dentified option , consider and review this information, and state the reasons for adopting a particular control option or options

. Incremental cost

effectiveness is defined as the difference in control costs divided by the difference in emission reductions between two potential control options achieving the same emission reduction goal.

The primary objectives in amending Rule 67.11 are to ensure ongoing compliance with

federal requirements to implement current Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) and State requirements to adopt all feasible measures applicable to the wood products coating industry

. The proposed amendment s will reduce volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions by specifying more stringent VOC limits for wood coating and cleaning materials. Similar requirements are already implemented in other air districts in California and compliant materials are widely av ailable in the marketplace at a cost comparable with the materials presently used.

There are no potential control options providing equivalent emission reduction s from wood products coating operations other than the mandatory use of add

- on emission control systems, which are costly

. Due to high costs, this control option would have very unfavorable cost

- effectiveness and incremental cost

- effectiveness values and is

therefore not feasible.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-40917 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. SANTIAGO BAEZ-MARTINEZ Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:07-CR-697-1 Before GARZA, CLEMENT, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Santiago Baez-Martinez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Baez-Martinez has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave towithdrawis GRANTED, counsel isexcused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D August 20, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk
§ 1628.3 Policy. ( a ) Recipients are permitted to retain from one fiscal year to the next LSC fund balances up to 10% of their LSC support.
( b ) Recipients may request a waiver to retain a fund balance up to a maximum of 25% of their LSC support for special circumstances.
( c ) Recipients may request a waiver to retain a fund balance in excess of 25% of a recipient's LSC support only for extraordinary and compelling circumstances, such as when a natural disaster or other catastrophic event prevents the timely expenditure of LSC funds, or when the recipient receives an insurance reimbursement, the proceeds from the sale of real property, a payment from a lawsuit in which the recipient was a party, or a payment from an LSC-funded lawsuit, regardless of whether the recipient was a party to the lawsuit.
( d ) A waiver pursuant to paragraph (b) or (c) of this section may be granted at the discretion of the Corporation pursuant to the criteria set out in § 1628.4(e).
( e ) In the absence of a waiver, a fund balance in excess of 10% of LSC support shall be repaid to the Corporation. If a waiver of the 10% ceiling is granted, any fund balance in excess of the amount permitted to be retained shall be repaid to the Corporation.
( f ) A recovery of an excess fund balance pursuant to this part does not constitute a termination under 45 CFR part 1606. *See* § 1606.2(c)(2)(ii).
( g ) One-time and special purpose grants awarded by the Corporation are not subject to the fund balance policy set forth in this part. Revenue and expenses relating to such grants shall be reflected separately in the audit report submitted to the Corporation. This may be done by establishing a separate fund or by providing a separate supplemental schedule of revenue and expenses related to such grants as a part of the audit report. No funds provided under a one-time or special purpose grant may be expended subsequent to the expiration date of the grant without the prior written approval of the Corporation. Absent approval from the Corporation, all unexpended funds under such grants shall be returned to the Corporation.
[65 FR 66642, Nov. 7, 2000, as amended at 80 FR 43968, July 24, 2015]
§ 152.7 PCIP proposal process. ( a ) *General.* A proposal from a State or nonprofit private entity to contract with HHS shall demonstrate that the eligible entity has the capacity and technical capability to perform all functions necessary for the design and operation of a PCIP, and that its proposed PCIP is in full compliance with all of the requirements of this part.
( b ) *Special rules for transitions in administration.* ( 1 ) Transitions from HHS administration of a PCIP to State administration must take effect on January 1 of a given year.
( 2 ) A State's proposal to administer a PCIP must meet all the requirements of this section.
( 3 ) Transitions from State administration to HHS administration must comply with the termination procedures of the PCIP contract in effect with the State or its designated entity.
( 4 ) The Secretary may establish other requirements needed to ensure a seamless transition of coverage for all existing enrollees.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1304

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1304 appear at 89 FR 67817, Aug. 21, 2024.

#### § 1304.13 Requirements to be considered for designation for a five-year period when the existing grant recipient in a community is not determined to be delivering a high-quality and comprehensive Head Start program and is not automatically renewed.

In order to compete for the opportunity to be awarded a five-year grant, an agency must submit an application to the responsible HHS official that demonstrates that it is the most qualified entity to deliver a high-quality and comprehensive Head Start program. The application must address the criteria for selection listed at section 641(d)(2) of the Head Start Act. Any agency that has had its Head Start grant terminated for cause in the preceding five years is excluded from competing in such competition for the next five years. A Head Start agency that has had a denial of refunding, as defined in 45 CFR part 1305, in the preceding five years is also excluded from competing.

[89 FR 67817, Aug. 21, 2024]