alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1148.8 How can I appeal a denial of my request? ( a ) *Requirements for making an appeal.* A requester may appeal any adverse determinations to the Arts Endowment's office designated to receive FOIA appeals (“FOIA Appeals Office”). Examples of adverse determinations are provided in § 1148.6(e). Requesters can submit appeals by mail by writing to Arts Endowment Chairman, c/o Office of General Counsel, National Endowment for the Arts, 400 7th Street SW, Washington, DC 20506, or online in accordance with instructions on the Arts Endowment's website (*https://www.arts.gov/freedom-information-act-guide*). The requester must make the appeal in writing and to be considered timely it must be postmarked, or in the case of electronic submissions, transmitted, within 90 calendar days after the date of the adverse determination. The appeal should clearly identify the Arts Endowment's determination that is being appealed and the assigned request number. To facilitate handling, the requester should mark both the appeal letter and envelope, or subject line of the electronic transmission, “Freedom of Information Act Appeal.”
( b ) *Adjudication of appeals.* ( 1 ) The Arts Endowment's Chairperson or his/her designee will act on behalf of the Arts Endowment's Chief FOIA Officer on all appeals under this section.
( 2 ) An appeal ordinarily will not be adjudicated if the request becomes a matter of FOIA litigation.
( c ) *Decisions on appeals.* The Arts Endowment will provide its decision on an appeal in writing. A decision that upholds the Arts Endowment's determination in whole or in part will contain a statement that identifies the reasons for its decision, including any FOIA exemptions applied. The decision will provide the requester with notification of the statutory right to file a lawsuit and will inform the requester of the dispute resolution services offered by the Office of Government Information Services (OGIS) of the National Archives and Records Administration as a non-exclusive alternative to litigation. If the Arts Endowment's decision is remanded or modified on appeal, the Arts Endowment will notify the requester of that determination in writing. The Arts Endowment will then further process the request in accordance with that appeal determination and will respond directly to the requester.
( d ) *Engaging in dispute resolution services provided by OGIS.* Dispute resolution is a voluntary process. If the Arts Endowment agrees to participate in the dispute resolution services provided by OGIS, it will actively engage as a partner to the process in an attempt to resolve the dispute.
( e ) *When appeal is required.* Before seeking review by a court of the Arts Endowment's adverse determination, a requester generally must first submit a timely administrative appeal.
( f ) *Timing of appeal.* After receiving the Arts Endowment's adverse determination, a requester has 90 calendar days to file an appeal in order for it to be considered timely. The Arts Endowment will not process or consider appeals that were not filed within 90 calendar days of the date of an adverse determination.
#### § 1618.2 Definitions.

*LSC requirements* means the provisions of the LSC Act, the Corporation's appropriations act or other law applicable to LSC funds, a Corporation rule, regulation, guideline or instruction, or the terms or conditions of the recipient's grant or contract with the Corporation.

*Violation* means a violation by the recipient of the LSC requirements.
118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 35 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), 

3 SECTION 1. USE OF THE ROTUNDA AND EMANCIPATION 

4 HALL OF THE CAPITOL. 

5 The rotunda and Emancipation Hall of the Capitol 

6 are authorized to be used on January 20, 2025, by the 

7 Joint Congressional Committee on Inaugural Ceremonies 

8 in connection with the proceedings and ceremonies con9 ducted for the inauguration of the President-elect and the 

10 Vice President-elect of the United States. 

Passed the Senate May 2, 2024. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 
118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 35 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the use of the rotunda and EmanciStates. elect and the Vice President-elect of the United conducted for the inauguration of the President- connection with the proceedings and ceremonies sional Committee on Inaugural Ceremonies in pation Hall of the Capitol by the Joint Congres-
#### § 1603.5 How will LSC respond to a request for expert testimony from an employee?

No employee shall serve as an expert witness in any proceeding described in § 1603.1(c) of this part or before a court or agency of the United States unless the General Counsel or the OIG Legal Counsel authorizes the employee's participation.
#### GUILFORD SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 3, OF STUTSMAN COUNTY, STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA, a Political Corporation, Respondent, v. DAKOTA TRUST COMPANY, a Corporation, Appellant.

(181 N. W. 589.)

Surety on *bond.*

The same question of law being involved in this cause as has heretofore been *236considered, in Stutsman County v. Dakota Trust Co. ante, 228, the judgment herein is modified upon the principles of law considered and determined in such case.

Opinion filed January 24, 1921.

Action to recover. on a surety bond in District Court, Stutsman County, *Coffey,*J.

Defendant has appealed from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff.

Judgment modified and affirmed.

*Lawrence & Murphy,*for appellant.

Moneys after due bear interest at the same rate as before maturity, and the statute rate of interest takes effect after the maturity of the obligation only in the event that there is no interest rate fixed in the contract, to be paid either before or after maturity. Overton v. Bolton (Tcnn.) 24 Am. Rep. 373; Hubbard v. Calahan, 42 Conn. 534, 19 Am. Rep.- 575; Hopkins v. Crittendon, 10 Tex. 189; Findley v. Hall, 12 Ohio, 610; Spencer v. Maxfield, 16 Wis. 178; Adams v. Way, 33 Conn. 431; Cornwall v. Sac County, 97 U. S. 61.

*John*IF. *Carr,*for respondent.

The contract rate of interest governs until the surety is notified of default of the principal, and demand is made upon the surety for payment. Dickinson v. White, 23 N. D. 523, 143 N. W. 754; United States Fidelity & G. Co. v. Pensacola (Fla.) Ann. Cas. 191GB, 1236.

Per Curiam.

This cause was heretofore before this court; 46 N. D. 307, 178 N. W. 727. The same question of law is involved in this case as has just been considered in Stutsman County v. Dakota Trust Co. ante, 228, 181 N. W. 586. The decision in that case governs in this case. It is accordingly ordered that the judgment be modified by the allowance of interest at 7 per cent per annum upon the principal demand until July 1, 1915, and thereafter at 6 per cent per annum, and, as so modified, that it be affirmed. Neither party will recover costs upon this appeal.

Robinson, Oh. J., and Bronson, Christianson, and Birdzeix, JJ., concur.

*237Grace, J.

(dissenting). I disagree with the conclusion arrived at by the majority opinion. The reasons for my dissent in this case are largely similar to those stated in Stutsman County v. Dakota Trust Co. ante, 228, 181 N. *W.*586.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Veterans Affairs

The Department of Veterans Affairs gives notice under the Public Law 92-463 (Federal Advisory Committee Act) that the Joint Biomedical Laboratory Research and Development and Clinical Science Research and Development Services Scientific Merit Review Board will conduct a telephone conference call meeting from 12 p.m. to 4 p.m. on December 4, 2006, at VA Central Office, 1722 I Street, NW., Room 915, Washington, DC.

The purpose of the Board is to provide advice on the scientific quality, budget, safety and mission relevance of investigator-initiated research proposals submitted for VA merit review consideration.

This meeting will focus on the clinical research program and will be open to the public for approximately one hour at the start of the meeting to discuss the general status of the program. The remaining portion of the meeting will be closed to the public for the review, discussion, and evaluation of initial and renewal projects.

The closed portion of the meeting involves discussion, examination, reference to staff and consultant critiques of research protocols. During this portion of the meeting, discussion and recommendations will deal with qualifications of personnel conducting the studies, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy, as well as research information, the premature disclosure of which could significantly frustrate implementation of proposed agency action regarding such research projects.

As provided by subsection 10(d) of Public Law 92-463, as amended, closing a portion of this meeting is in accordance with 5 U.S.C., 552b(c)(6) and (9)(B). Those who plan to attend or would like to obtain a copy of the minutes of this meeting and roster of the members should contact LeRoy G. Frey, Ph.D., Chief, Program Review (121F), Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC, 20420 at (202) 254-0288.

Dated: November 13, 2006.

By Director of the Secretary.

E. Philip Riggin,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 06-9280  Filed 11-12-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8320-01-M
§ 1151.23 New construction. ( a ) *Design, construction, and alteration.* New facilities shall be designed and constructed to be readily accessible to and usable by handicapped persons. Alterations to existing facilities shall, to the maximum extent feasible, be designed and constructed to be readily accessible to and usable by handicapped persons.
( b ) *Conformance with Uniform Federal Accessibility Standards.* ( 1 ) Effective as of January 18, 1991, design, construction, or alteration of buildings in conformance with sections 3-8 of the Uniform Federal Accessibility Standards (USAF) (appendix A to 41 CFR subpart 101-19.6) shall be deemed to comply with the requirements of this section with respect to those buildings. Departures from particular technical and scoping requirements of UFAS by the use of other methods are permitted where substantially equivalent or greater access to and usability of the building is provided.
( 2 ) For purposes of this section, section 4.1.6(1)(g) of UFAS shall be interpreted to exempt from the requirements of UFAS only mechanical rooms and other spaces that, because of their intended use, will not require accessibility to the public or beneficiaries or result in the employment or residence therein of persons with physical handicaps.
( 3 ) This section does not require recipients to make building alterations that have little likelihood of being accomplished without removing or altering a load-bearing structural member.
[44 FR 22734, Apr. 17, 1979, as amended at 55 FR 52138, 52142, Dec. 19, 1990]
§ 1356.67 Procedures for the transfer of placement and care responsibility of a child from a State to a Tribal title IV-E agency or an Indian Tribe with a title IV-E agreement. ( a ) Each State with a title IV-E plan approved under section 471 of the Act must establish and maintain procedures, in consultation with Indian Tribes, for the transfer of responsibility for the placement and care of a child under a State title IV-E plan to a Tribal title IV-E agency or an Indian Tribe with a title IV-E agreement in a way that does not affect a child's eligibility for, or payment of, title IV-E and the child's eligibility for medical assistance under title XIX of the Act.
( b ) The procedures must, at a minimum, provide for the State to: ( 1 ) Determine, if the eligibility determination is not already completed, the child's eligibility under section 472 or 473 of the Act at the time of the transfer of placement and care responsibility of a child to a Tribal title IV-E agency or an Indian Tribe with a title IV-E agreement.
( 2 ) Provide essential documents and information necessary to continue a child's eligibility under title IV-E and Medicaid programs under title XIX to the Tribal title IV-E agency, including, but not limited to providing: ( i ) All judicial determinations to the effect that continuation in the home from which the child was removed would be contrary to the welfare of the child and that reasonable efforts described in section 471(a)(15) of the Act have been made;
( ii ) Other documentation the State has that relates to the child's title IV-E eligibility under sections 472 and 473 of the Act;
( iii ) Information and documentation available to the agency regarding the child's eligibility or potential eligibility for other Federal benefits;
( iv ) The case plan developed pursuant to section 475(1) of the Act, including health and education records of the child pursuant to section 475(1)(C) of the Act; and
( v ) Information and documentation of the child's placement settings, including a copy of the most recent provider's license or approval.
[77 FR 950, Jan. 6, 2012]
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 958 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 958

   To amend the Trade Act of 1974 to modify the requirements for the 
 annual report on the trade agreements program and the national trade 
   policy agenda to include an assessment of impacts on the national 
   defense strategy and the national security strategy of the United 
                    States, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 23, 2023

 Mr. Lankford (for himself and Mr. Menendez) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Trade Act of 1974 to modify the requirements for the 
 annual report on the trade agreements program and the national trade 
   policy agenda to include an assessment of impacts on the national 
   defense strategy and the national security strategy of the United 
                    States, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``American Economic Diplomacy Act''.

SEC. 2. MODIFICATION TO ANNUAL REPORT ON TRADE AGREEMENTS PROGRAM AND 
              NATIONAL TRADE POLICY AGENDA.

    Section 163(a)(3)(A) of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 
2213(a)(3)(A)) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating clause (iv) as clause (v);
            (2) in clause (iii), by striking ``and'' at the end; and
            (3) by inserting after clause (iii) the following:
                    ``(iv) how such objectives and priorities support 
                and advance the objectives of--
                            ``(I) the national defense strategy under 
                        113(g) of title 10, United States Code; and
                            ``(II) the national security strategy of 
                        the United States under section 108 of the 
                        National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3043); 
                        and''.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 32****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the quarterly report of Park-Ohio Industries,Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for theperiod ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), each of the undersigned officers of theCompany certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, that, to such officer’s knowledge:     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and     (2) The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company as of the dates and for theperiods expressed in the Report.Date: August 11, 2006 By     /s/ Edward F. Crawford           Name: Edward F. Crawford     Title: Chairman and Chief Executive Officer By     /s/ Richard P. Elliott           Name: Richard P. Elliott     Title: Vice President and Chief Financial Officer     The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuantto 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed aspart of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
§ 101.34 Preferential scheduling. ( a ) A person must schedule operations, including the acquisition of all needed production items or services, in a timely manner to satisfy the delivery requirements of each rated order. Modifying production or delivery schedules is necessary only when required delivery dates for rated orders cannot otherwise be met.
( b ) DO rated orders must be given production preference over unrated orders, if necessary, to meet required delivery dates, even if this requires the diversion of items being processed or ready for delivery or services being performed against unrated orders. Similarly, DX rated orders must be given preference over DO rated orders and unrated orders. (Examples: If a person receives a DO rated order with a delivery date of June 3 and if meeting that date would mean delaying production or delivery of an item for an unrated order, the unrated order must be delayed. If a DX rated order is received calling for delivery on July 15 and a person has a DO rated order requiring delivery on June 2 and operations can be scheduled to meet both deliveries, there is no need to alter production schedules to give any additional preference to the DX rated order. However, if business operations cannot be altered to meet both the June 2 and July 15 delivery dates, then the DX rated order must be given priority over the DO rated order.)
( c ) ( 1 ) If a person finds that delivery or performance against any accepted rated orders conflicts with the delivery or performance against other accepted rated orders of equal priority status, the person shall give precedence to the conflicting orders in the sequence in which they are to be delivered or performed (not to the receipt dates). If the conflicting orders are scheduled to be delivered or performed on the same day, the person shall give precedence to those orders that have the earliest receipt dates.
( 2 ) If a person is unable to resolve rated order delivery or performance conflicts under this section, the person should promptly seek special priorities assistance as provided in §§ 101.40 through 101.44. If the person's customer objects to the rescheduling of delivery or performance of a rated order, the customer should promptly seek special priorities assistance as provided in §§ 101.40 through 101.44. For any rated order against which delivery or performance will be delayed, the person must notify the customer as provided in § 101.33(d)(2).
( d ) If a person is unable to purchase needed production items in time to fill a rated order by its required delivery date, the person must fill the rated order by using inventoried production items. A person who uses inventoried items to fill a rated order may replace those items with the use of a rated order as provided in § 101.37(b).
§ 1250.28 How do I request expedited processing? ( a ) NARA processes requests and appeals on an expedited basis whenever we determine that one or more of the following criteria exist: ( 1 ) A reasonable expectation of an imminent threat to an individual's life or physical safety;
( 2 ) A reasonable expectation of an imminent loss of a substantial due process right;
( 3 ) An urgent need to inform the public about an actual or alleged Federal Government activity (this criterion applies only to those requests made by a person primarily engaged in disseminating information to the public); or
( 4 ) A matter of widespread and exceptional media interest in which there exist possible questions that affect public confidence in the Government's integrity.
( b ) NARA can expedite requests, or segments of requests, only for records over which we have control. If NARA must refer a request to another agency, we will inform you and suggest that you seek expedited review from that agency. NARA cannot expedite the review of classified records nor can we shorten the Presidential notification period described in 36 CFR 1250.26(j).
( c ) To request expedited processing, you must submit a statement, certified to be true and correct, explaining the basis for your need for expedited processing. You must send the request to the appropriate official at the address listed in § 1250.22 of this subpart. You may request expedited processing when you first request records or at any time during NARA's processing of your request or appeal.
( d ) We will respond to your request for expedited processing within 10 calendar days of our receipt of your request to expedite. If we grant your request, the NARA office responsible for the review of the requested records will process your request as a priority, and it will be processed as soon as practicable. We will inform you if we deny your request for expedited processing. If you decide to appeal that denial, we will expedite our review of your appeal.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                   CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of ISP Chemco Inc.
(the "Company") for the quarterly period ended October 2, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Sunil
Kumar, as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Roger J.
Cope, as Senior Vice President and Interim Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
his knowledge and belief:

         (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


 /s/ Sunil Kumar
---------------------------------
Name:   Sunil Kumar
Title:  President and Chief Executive Officer

Date:   November 16, 2005


  /s/ Roger J. Cope
---------------------------------
Name:   Roger J. Cope
Title:  Senior Vice President and
          Interim Chief Financial Officer

Date:   November 16, 2005


     This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.