alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
In the Interest of J.G.C., J.R.C., J.M.C., ) and J.G.C., children. ) ) ) J.G.C., ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-1265 ) DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN and ) FAMILIES and GUARDIAN AD LITEM ) PROGRAM, ) ) Appellees. ) ) Opinion filed November 30, 2018. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Manatee County; Teri Kaklis Dees, Judge. C. Michael Kelly, Bradenton, for Appellant. Meredith K. Hall, Children's Legal Services, Bradenton, for Appellee Department of Children and Families. Thomasina Moore, Statewide Director of Appeals, Guardian ad Litem Program, Tallahassee; and Donald A. Mihokovich, Tampa, for Appellee Guardian ad Litem Program.- 2 -

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

NORTHCUTT, CASANUEVA, and CRENSHAW, JJ., Concur.
### TMDL s and Data used for Economic Anal ys is

This DVD consists of data and Total Maximum Daily L oads used in developing the Preliminary Estimate of Potential Compliance Costs and Benefits Associated with EPA’s Proposed Numeric Nutrient Criteria for Florida. Files included are from the following sources:

United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA). 2009b. Permit Compliance System Database. Accessed May 2009. http://www.epa.gov/enviro/html/pcs/adhoc.html Florida Geological Data Library (FGDL). 2 009. GIS Data: WBIDs. http://www.fgdl.org/download/index.html Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP). 2009b. Wastewater Facility Information: Wastewater Facility Regulation (WAFR) database. http://www.dep.state.fl.us/water/wastewater/facinf o.htm. Accessed June 2009 Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP). 2009c. Final Verified Lists for Group 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5. http://www.dep.state.fl.us/water/watersheds/assessment/303drule.htm
118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 44 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), That in the enrollment of the bill H.R. 5009, 

3 the Clerk of the House of Representatives shall make the 

4 following corrections: 

5 (1) In the table of contents in section 2(b), 

6 strike the item relating to section 5705 and insert 

7 the following: 

Sec. 5705. Readmission requirements for servicemembers. 

8 (2) In the table of section 601 regarding basic 

9 pay for enlisted members, in the entry relating to a 

10 member in pay grade E–5 with over 2 years, strike 

11 ‘‘3,317.10’’ and insert ‘‘3,466.50’’. 

12 (3) In such table, in the entry relating to a 

13 member in such pay grade with over 3 years, strike 

14 ‘‘3,480.90’’ and insert ‘‘3,637.50’’. 

15 (4) In such table, in the entry relating to a 

16 member in such pay grade with over 4 years, strike 

17 ‘‘3,638.40’’ and insert ‘‘3,802.20’’. 
2 

†SCON 44 ES 

1 (5) In such table, in the entry relating to a 

2 member in such pay grade with over 6 years, strike 

3 ‘‘3,789.00’’ and insert ‘‘3,959.40’’. 

4 (6) In such table, in the entry relating to a 

5 member in such pay grade with over 8 years, strike 

6 ‘‘3,964.20’’ and insert ‘‘4,142.40’’. 

7 (7) In the table of contents preceding section 

8 5701, strike the item relating to section 5705 and 

9 insert the following: 

Sec. 5705. Readmission requirements for servicemembers. 

10 (8) Strike section 5705 and insert the following: 

11 SEC. 5705. READMISSION REQUIREMENTS FOR 

12 SERVICEMEMBERS. 

13 Subsection (a) of section 484C of the Higher Edu14 cation Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1091c(a)) is amended to 

15 read as follows: 

16 ‘‘(a) DEFINITION OF SERVICE IN THE UNIFORMED

17 SERVICES.—In this section, the term ‘service in the uni18 formed services’ means service (whether voluntary or in19 voluntary) on active duty in the Armed Forces, including 

20 such service by a member of the National Guard or Re21 serve.’’. 

22 (9) Amend the title so as to read: ‘‘An Act to 

23 authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2025 for 

24 military activities of the Department of Defense, for 

25 military construction, and for defense activities of 
3 

†SCON 44 ES 

1 the Department of Energy, to prescribe military per2 sonnel strengths for such fiscal year, and for other 

3 purposes.’’. 

Passed the Senate December 18 (legislative day, December 16), 2024. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 
118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 44 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Directing the Clerk of the House of Representatives 

H.R. 5009. to make a correction in the enrollment of the bill
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Salomon Smith Barney Global Diversified Futures Fund L.P. (the ‘‘Partnership’’) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ‘‘Report’’), I, Jennifer Magro, Chief Financial Officer and Director of Citigroup Managed Futures LLC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

/s/ Jennifer Magro                                    Jennifer MagroCitigroup Managed Futures LLC Chief Financial Officer and Director

Date: August 14, 2007

----
#### Matter of Syracuse Northern Railroad Company v. Alexander *et al.,*appellants.

*Eminent domain—street taken for railroad—appraisal of damages.*

Individuals owning lands bounded by a public street are entitled to occupy up to the line of such street, and to the use of the street for any purposes connected with such occupation, not conflicting with the right and easement of a railroad company under a license to lay down their rails on such street; and their damage for the taking by such railroad company of a portion of the land, for the use of the railroad, should be appraised upon that basis.

Appeal from an order of the special term confirming the report of commissioners appointed to appraise the damages sustained by William H. Alexander and others for the taking of their land for railroad purposes. The commissioners held that the lands taken, which were adjoining the railroad track of another company, did not front upon a public street.

*Geo. N. Kennedy,*for appellants.

*Hiscock, Gifford & Doheny,*for respondent.

E. Darwin Smith, J.

The opinion holds, as a matter of fact, that the lands front upon a public street. The head-note contains the only question of law passed upon. The order was reversed and a new appraisement ordered by new commissioners to be appointed for that purpose.

*Ordered accordingly.*
#### § 159.110 Definitions.

For purposes of part 159, the following definitions apply unless otherwise provided:

*Health Insurance Coverage:* We adopt the Public Health Service Act (PHSA) definition of “health insurance coverage” found at section 2791(b)(1) of the Public Health Service Act (PHSA).

*Health Insurance Issuer:* We adopt the PHSA definition of “health insurance issuer” found at section 2791(b)(2) of the PHSA.

*Health Insurance Product:* Means a package of benefits that an issuer offers that is reported to State regulators in an insurance filing.

*Individual Health Insurance Coverage:* We adopt the PHSA definition of “individual health insurance coverage” found at section 2791(b)(5) of the PHSA.

*Individual Market:* We adopt the Affordable Care Act definition of “individual market” found at section 1304(a)(2) of the Affordable Care Act and 2791(e)(1)(A) of the PHSA.

*Portal Plan:* Means the discrete pairing of a package of benefits and a particular cost sharing option (not including premium rates or premium quotes).

*Section 1101 High Risk Pools:* We define section 1101 high risk pools as any entity described in regulations implementing section 1101 of the Affordable Care Act.

*Small Employer:* We adopt the Affordable Care Act definition of “small employer” found at section 1304(b)(2) and (3).

*Small Group Coverage:* Means health insurance coverage offered to employees of small employers in the small group market.

*Small Group Market:* We adopt the Affordable Care Act definition of “small group market” found at section 1304(a)(3).

*State Health Benefits High Risk Pools:* Means nonprofit organizations created by State law to offer comprehensive health insurance to individuals who otherwise would be unable to secure such coverage because of their health status.
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and 

Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors 

so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press.

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS

No. 15-BG-634

IN RE: ROBERT L. SHIELDS,

Respondent.

Bar Registration No. 463074 BDN: 57-15

BEFORE: Easterly, Associate Judge, and Pryor and Terry, Senior Judges. 

ORDER

(FILED - October 15, 2015)

On consideration of the certified order of the Court of Appeals of Maryland 

disbarring respondent from the practice of law in that jurisdiction, see Attorney 

Grievance Comm’n of Maryland v. Shields, 109 A.3d 664 (Md. 2015), this court’s 

July 1, 2015, order directing respondent to show cause why the reciprocal 

discipline of disbarment should not be imposed, and the statement of Bar Counsel 

regarding reciprocal discipline, and it appearing that respondent has failed to file 

either a response to this court’s order to show cause or the affidavit as required by 

D.C. Bar R. XI, §14 (g), it is

ORDERED that Robert L. Shields is hereby disbarred from the practice of 

law in the District of Columbia. See In re Sibley, 990 A.2d 483 (D.C. 2010), and 

In re Fuller, 930 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C. 2007) (rebuttable presumption of identical 

reciprocal discipline applies to all cases in which the respondent does not 

participate). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that for purposes of reinstatement respondent’s 

period of disbarment will not begin to run until such time as he files an affidavit 

that fully complies with the requirements of D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14 (g). 

PER CURIAM.
§ 1220.2-1 Full-time volunteers. ( a ) ( 1 ) The Corporation for National and Community Service will pay all reasonable expenses for defense of full-time volunteers up to and including the arraignment of Federal, state, and local criminal proceedings, except in cases where it is clear that the charged offense results from conduct which is not related to his service as a volunteer.
( 2 ) Situations where conduct is clearly unrelated to a volunteer's service are those that arise either: ( i ) In a period prior to volunteer service,
( ii ) Under circumstances where the volunteer is not at his assigned volunteer project location, such as during periods of administrative, vacation, or emergency leave, or
( iii ) When he is at his volunteer station, but the activity or action giving rise to the charged offense is clearly not part of, or required by, such assignment.
( b ) Reasonable expenses in criminal proceedings beyond arraignment may be paid in cases where: ( 1 ) The charge against the volunteer relates to his assignment or status as a volunteer, and not his personal status or personal matters. A charge relating to a volunteer's assignment arises out of any activity or action which is a part of, or required by, such assignment. A charge relating to a volunteer's status is motivated exclusively by the fact that a defendant is a volunteer.
( 2 ) The volunteer has not admitted a willful or knowing violation of law, and
( 3 ) The charge(s) is not a minor misdemeanor, such as a minor vehicle violation for which a fine or bail forfeiture will not exceed $100.
( c ) Notwithstanding the foregoing, there may be situations in which the criminal proceeding results from a situation which could give rise to a civil claim under the Federal Tort Claims Act. In such situations, the Justice Department may agree to defend the volunteer. In those cases, unless there is a conflict between the volunteer's interest and that of the government, the Corporation for National and Community Service will not pay for additional private representation for the volunteer.
[40 FR 28800, July 9, 1975, as amended at 80 FR 63458, Oct. 20, 2015]
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 82 (Wednesday, April 29, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 23824]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-10114]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES

Institute of Museum and Library Services

Sunshine Act Meeting of the National Museum and Library Services 
Board

AGENCY: Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS), NFAH.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Museum and Library Services Board, which advises 
the Director of the Institute of Museum and Library Services on general 
policies with respect to the duties, powers, and authority of the 
Institute relating to museum, library and information services, will 
meet on May 19, 2015.

DATE AND TIME: Tuesday, May 19, 2015, from 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. EST.

PLACE: The meeting will be held at the Institute of Museum and Library 
Services, 1800 M Street NW., Suite 900, Washington, DC, 20036. 
Telephone: (202) 653-4798.

STATUS: This meeting will be open to the public.

AGENDA: Thirty-First Meeting of the National Museum and Library Service 
Board Meeting:

I. Welcome
II. Financial Update
III. Partnership Update
IV. Office of Museum Services Update and Program
V. Office of Library Services Update and Program
VI. Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation Update

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Katherine Maas, Program Specialist, 
Institute of Museum and Library Services, 1800 M Street NW., 9th Floor, 
Washington, DC 20036. Telephone: (202) 653-4676. Please provide advance 
notice of any special needs or accommodations.

    Dated: April 27, 2015.
Andrew Christopher,
Associate General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2015-10114 Filed 4-27-15; 4:15 pm]
 BILLING CODE 7036-01-P
```
Exhibit 31.2
**302 CERTIFICATION**
I, Alan G. Silverglat, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Pulitzer Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f)and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control overfinancial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regardingthe reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for externalpurposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.
Date: May 2, 2005
/s/ Alan G. Silverglat
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.11

                             PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT
                                  UNITED STATES

                                          PROGRAM SERVICES AGREEMENT # 4900RL367
                                            PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT # 4900RL1400

EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT: October 1, 2000

This Participation Agreement ("PA") adopts and incorporates by reference all of
the terms and conditions of the Program Services Agreement Number 4900RL1367
("Agreement") amongst IBM Corporation, Direct Alliance Corporation ("DAC"), and
Insight Enterprises, Inc. ("Parent").

The parties to this PA agree that all Program related activity in the United
States will be conducted in accordance with, and be subject to, the terms and
conditions of this PA.

AMENDMENTS: The following terms and conditions amend provisions of the Agreement
only as they apply to the Program activity in the United States.

1.0      CHOICE OF LAW AND FORUM; WAIVER OF JURY TRIAL; LIMITATION OF ACTION
This PA and the performance of transactions under this PA will be governed by
the laws of the State of New York. The United Nations Convention on Contracts
for the International Sale of Goods does not apply. The parties expressly waive
any right to a jury trial regarding disputes related to this PA. Any legal or
other action related to this Agreement must be commenced no later than two (2)
years from the date on which the cause of action arose.

2.0      SURVIVAL
In the event the Agreement is terminated, the terms and conditions of the
Agreement incorporated by reference herein shall survive such termination and
remain in effect for purposes of this PA only.

3.0      SELECTED PROGRAM SERVICES
In addition to all its responsibilities set forth in the Agreement, DAC will
perform all of the Program services and responsibilities described in Section
4.2, with the exception of Section 4.2.8.4, of Exhibit A to the Agreement. DAC
will include all costs, arising out of DAC's performance of its responsibilities
under this section, in a Requisition Form, as set forth in Section 1.17 of the
Agreement, for IBM's review and approval. DAC's performance under this section
is subject to all requirements set forth in the Agreement, including but not
limited to all Exhibits, and the document entitled "Program Business Rules and
Policies - United States", which is incorporated herein by reference.

IBM CORPORATION

BY: ________________________________________________
Mr. Robert W. Moffat, General Manager
Date of Signature:_____________________________________

DIRECT ALLIANCE CORPORATION

BY: ________________________________________________
Mr. Tony M. Smith, President
Date of Signature:_____________________________________

Parent acknowledges and accepts its obligations under this Agreement by signing
below.

INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.

BY: ________________________________________________
Mr. Tim Crown, President and Co-Chief Executive Officer
Date of Signature:_____________________________________
#### In the Matter of the Petition of Maynard N. Clement as State Commissioner of Excise, Appellant, for the Revocation of Liquor Tax Certificate No. 14,648, Issued to John Ulinski, Respondent.

*Matter of Clement (Ulinski),*119 App. Div. 633, affirmed.

(Argued November 18, 1907;

decided December 3, 1907.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered *524May 28,1907, which affirmed an order of Special' Term denying a motion for the revocation of a liquor tax certificate.

*Daniel A. Reed*and *H. Walter Lee*for appellant.

*Henry W. Killeen*for respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Vann,Werner,Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ. Absent: O’Brien, J.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-6533

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ROBERT RUHE, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, Chief District Judge. (CR-96-3, CA-00-188-1) Submitted: August 15, 2002 Decided: August 20, 2002 Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John Farnan Potts, Toledo, Ohio, for Appellant. Zelda Elizabeth Wesley, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Clarksburg, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Robert Ruhe seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Ruhe , Nos. CR-96-3; CA-00-188-1 (N.D.W. Va. Feb. 28, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED