alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
July 30, 2015 U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Operations West Building Ground Floor Room W12-140 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. Washington , DC 20590 

# AmericanAirlines" "--

Re: Petition for Extension to Exemption 10882 (Docket Number FAA-2013-0078) Ladies/Gentlemen : Pursuant to Federal Aviation Regulation 14 CFR 11 .63, American Airlines petitions the Administrator for extension to exemption from 14 CFR 121 .915(d) to the extent necessary to permit American Airlines to continue using the currently approved Continuing Qualification Training Program. This permits American Airlines to conduct Continuing Qualification training in the same manner for all fleets , including new fleets, without waiting 24 calendar months to petition the FAA to exceed the 24 month cycle, with two Continuing Qualification evaluations. This exemption has been used by American Airlines for almost two years, with no negative impact. American Airlines continues to be in compliance with the conditions of the exemption to 14 CFR Part 121.915 (d) , and believes that extending Exemption No. 10882, as stated, would have no adverse effect on safety. Therefore, we respectfully request an extension of Exemption No. 10882 for two more years, or other appropriate period of regulatory relief. American Airlines suggests that good cause exists for waiving publication of notice ofthis petition in the Federal Register. The grant of exemption petitioned for here would not set a precedent, and the exemption would in all ways, other than the effective date, be identical to the exemption now in place. Delay in acting on the petition would be detrimental to the petitioner and to the public, as well. Please let me know ifthere is any further information you need for your review ofthis petition. Thank you for your consideration . Sincerely

Captain Ronald Thomas Managing Director, Flight Operations American Airlines 4601 Highway 360 MD 843 Fort Worth , Texas 76155 817-967-51562 

## IAmerican Airline Petition for Extension to Exemption (FAR 121 .915) SUMMARY American Airlines petition for an amendment to Exemption No. 10882 to extend the expiration date of same which permits American Airlines to conduct Continuing Qualification training in the same manner for all fleets, including new fleets , without waiting 24 calendar months to petition the FAA to exceed the 24 month cycle, with two Continuing Qualification evaluations.
#### § 1167.3 Definitions.

The following definitions apply to this part:

*Agency* or *NEH* means the National Endowment for the Humanities.

*Demand* means a subpoena, order, or other demand of a court or other competent authority, issued in a legal proceeding, for the production of official records and information or for the testimony of an NEH employee.

*General Counsel* means the General Counsel of the agency, or any person to whom the General Counsel has delegated authority under this part.

*Legal proceeding* means any proceeding before a court of law, administrative board or commission, hearing officer, or other body conducting a legal or administrative proceeding.

*NEH employee* or *employee* means any present or former officer or employee of NEH; any other individual hired through contractual agreement by or on behalf of NEH, or who has performed or is performing services under such an agreement for NEH; and any individual who served or is serving on an NEH advisory committee.

*Official records and information* means all documents and material in the custody and control of NEH; relating to information in the custody and control of NEH; or acquired by an NEH employee in the performance of his or her official duties or because of his or her official status, while the individual was employed by or on behalf of the NEH.

*Request* means any request in connection with an ongoing or threatened legal proceeding, by whatever method, for the production of official records and information or for testimony, other than a demand.

*Testimony* means any written or oral statement by a witness, and includes depositions, answers to interrogatories, affidavits, declarations, and statements at a hearing or trial.
Exhibit 32.1

                              CAVIT SCIENCES, INC.
                              A Florida Corporation

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with  the  Annual  Report  of  Cavit  Sciences,  Inc.  (the
"registrant") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Colm J. King, President and Chief Executive Officer,  certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the registrant.


Dated: April 17, 2008                      /s/ Colm J. King
                                           -------------------------------------
                                      By:  Colm J. King
                                      Its: President and Chief Executive Officer
Date of Public Distribution/Dissemination

Amount

Date of Disbursement or Obligation

Date of Public Distribution/Dissemination

Amount

Date of Disbursement or Obligation

Memo Item

Memo Item

FEC Schedule E (Form 3X) Rev. 0/2016

Calendar Year-To-Date

Per Election for Office Sought

Calendar Year-To-Date

Per Election for Office Sought

NAME OF COMMITTEE (In Full)

SCHEDULE E (FEC Form 3X)

ITEMIZED INDEPENDENT EXPENDITURES

FOR LINE 24 OF FORM 3X

PAGE OF

C

FEC IDENTIFICATION NUMBER ▼

	 ▲	 ▲	 ▲

	 ▲	 ▲	 ▲

, , .

, , .

Full Name of Payee

Mailing Address

City State Zip Code

Purpose of Expenditure

Name of Federal Candidate:

Full Name of Payee

Mailing Address

City State Zip Code

Purpose of Expenditure

Name of Federal Candidate:

M M / D D / Y Y Y Y

M M / D D / Y Y Y Y

M M / D D / Y Y Y Y

M M / D D / Y Y Y Y

	 ▲	 ▲	 ▲ , , .

	 ▲	 ▲	 ▲ , , .

	 ▲	 ▲	 ▲ , , .

	 ▲	 ▲	 ▲ , , .

	 ▲	 ▲	 ▲ , , .

Disbursement For: Primary General

Other (specify)

Disbursement For: Primary General

Other (specify)

Category/

Type

Category/

Type

Office Sought: House District:

President Senate State:

 

Office Sought: House District:

President Senate State:

 

▼

Check if 24-hour report 48-hour report New report Amends report filed on M M / D D / Y Y Y Y

Support

Oppose

Support

Oppose

(a) SUBTOTAL of Itemized Independent Expenditures ..............................................................

(a) SUBTOTAL of Unitemized Independent Expenditures..........................................................

(a) TOTAL Independent Expenditures ........................................................................................

▼

▼

▼

▼

Under penalty of perjury I certify that the independent expenditures reported herein were not made in cooperation, consultation, or concert 

with, or at the request or suggestion of, any candidate or authorized committee or agent of either, or (if the reporting entity is not a political 

party committee) any political party committee or its agent.

Date

Signature

M M / D D / Y Y Y Y
Exhibit32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Salomon Smith Barney Global Diversified FuturesFund L.P. (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Qfor the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), I, Daniel R. McAuliffe, Jr., ChiefFinancial Officer and Director of Citigroup Managed Futures LLC,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Partnership.

/s/ Daniel R.McAuliffe, Jr.

|  |
|--|
|  |  |
|  |

Daniel R.McAuliffe, Jr.Citigroup Managed Futures LLC Chief FinancialOfficer and Director     May 16,2005

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel, November 2, 2006, 8:30 a.m. to November 3, 2006, 5 p.m., Jurys Washington Hotel, 1500 New Hampshire Ave., NW., Washington, DC, 20036 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on October 16, 2006, 71 FR 60744-60746.                

The meeting will be held one day only November 2, 2006. The meeting time and location remain the same. The meeting is closed to the public.

Dated: October 27, 2006.

Anna Snouffer,

Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 06-9031  Filed 11-2-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Exhibit
32.1








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 0F 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Art Design, Inc.(the Company") on Form
10-KSB/A for the period ended herein as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "Report"), I. Kathy Sheehan, Chief Executive and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:


(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
information contained in the Report fully presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations or the Company.





Dated: September
4, 2008








By:
            /s/Kathy
      SheehanKathy
      Sheehan
              Chief
      Executive Officer
              Chief
      Financial Officer
### NUMBER 13 - 14 - 00 658 - CV 

## COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________ NASHIN MANOHAR , A ppellant ,
v. PRITI MANOHAR , A ppellee

.

____________________________________________________________

On a ppeal from the County Court at Law No. 8

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________ 

## ORDER
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza Order Per Curiam Appellant, Nashin Manohar , appealed a judgment entered by the County Court at Law No. 8 of Hidalgo County, Texas. On December 8 , 2014 , the Clerk of this Court notified appellant , in accordance with Texas Rule of Appell ate Procedure 42.3(c), that we would dismiss this appeal unless the $195.00 filing fee was paid. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 42.3(c)

. Appellant did not respond to th e notice from the Clerk or pa y the $195.00 filing2

fee. See id. R. 5, 12.1(b). Accordingly, on January 22, 2015, this Court dismissed the appeal. See Manohar v. Manohar , 13

- 14

- 00658

- CV, 2015 WL 314692, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Corpus Christi Jan. 22, 2015, no. pet. h.) . Currently before the Court is appellant’s unopposed motion to reinst ate the appeal, and upon reinstatement, abate the appeal in order for the trial court to conduct the appropriate hearing to effectuate the parties’ mediated settlement agreement. The Court, having examined and fully considered appellant’s unopposed motio n, is of the opinion that it should be granted. Accordingly, we grant the motion to reinstate and abate the appeal . We withdraw our previous opinion and judgment. We abate this appeal and remand this matter to the trial court in order to “permit proceed ings in the trial
court to effectuate the agreement.” See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a)(2)(C). The parties are instructed to report to this Court regarding the trial court proceedings on abatement and to file an appropriate motion to reinstate the appeal, or m otion to dismiss the appeal, as
necessary, within thirty days of the date of this order. Further, appellant is hereby directed to pay the $195.00 filing fee for this appeal within fifteen days from the date of
this order.

PER CURIAM
D elivered and filed the 12th day of February, 20 1 5

.
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of RecycleNet Corporation, (the “Company”)
on 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Richard R. Ivanovick Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.








November
      12, 2009
            /s/
      Richard R. IvanovickRichard
      R. IvanovickChief
      Financial Officer
#### § 504.10 Dogs and other animals.

Dogs and other animals, except seeing-eye dogs, shall not be brought upon the premises for other than official purposes.
#### § 401.5 Control and supervision of materials, design, and building.

The Commission controls the design and prescribes regulations for the building of all memorial monuments and buildings commemorating the service of American Armed Forces that are built in a foreign country or political division of the foreign country that authorizes the Commission to carry out those duties and powers.
§ 156.1255 Renewal and re-enrollment notices. A health insurance issuer that is renewing an enrollment group's coverage in an individual market QHP offered through the Exchange (including a renewal with modifications) in accordance with § 147.106 of this subchapter, or that is nonrenewing coverage offered through the Exchange and automatically enrolling an enrollee in a QHP under a different product offered by the same QHP issuer through the Exchange in accordance with § 155.335 of this subchapter, must include the following information in the applicable notice described in § 147.106(b)(5), (c)(1), or (f)(1) of this subchapter: ( a ) Premium and advance payment of the premium tax credit information sufficient to notify the enrollment group of its expected monthly premium payment under the renewed coverage, in a form and manner specified by the Exchange, provided that if the Exchange does not provide this information to enrollees and does not require issuers to provide this information to enrollees, consistent with this section, such information must be provided in a form and manner specified by HHS;
( b ) An explanation of the requirement to report changes to the Exchange, as specified in § 155.335(e) of this subchapter, the timeframe and channels through which changes can be reported, and the implications of not reporting changes;
( c ) For an enrollment group that includes an enrollee on whose behalf advance payments of the premium tax credit are being provided, an explanation of the reconciliation process for advance payments of the premium tax credit established in accordance with 26 CFR 1.36B-4; and
( d ) For an enrollment group that includes an enrollee being provided cost-sharing reductions, but for whom no QHP under the product remains available for renewal at the silver level, an explanation that in accordance with § 155.305(g)(1)(ii) of this subchapter, cost-sharing reductions are only available to an individual who is not an Indian if he or she is enrolled in a silver-level QHP.
[79 FR 53006, Sept. 5, 2014]
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-13-00093-CV

PEREZ HILTON MANAGEMENT, INC., D/B/A PEREZITOS.COM, Appellant

V.

KRISTINA HEAD, A/K/A KRISTINA ROBINSON, Appellee

On Appeal from the 71st District Court

Harrison County, Texas

Trial Court No. 13-0040

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Perez Hilton Management, Inc., d/b/a Perezitos.com, appellant, filed this interlocutory 

appeal from the trial court’s denial of its special appearance. Appellant has now filed a motion 

with this Court stating that the claims against in it the proceeding below have been dismissed and 

seeking to dismiss the appeal. Pursuant to Rule 42.1(a)(1) of the Texas Rules of Appellate 

Procedure, the motion is granted. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1).

We dismiss the appeal.

Josh R. Morriss, III

Chief Justice

Date Submitted: December 19, 2013

Date Decided: December 20, 2013
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

YURIBIA MEDINA DAMACIO,

Petitioner,

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent. No. 15

- 73425

Agency No. A205

- 259

- 009

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 16 , 2022 * *

Before: SILVERMAN, MILLER, and BUMATAY , Circuit Judges.

Yuribia Medina Damacio , a native and citizen of Mexico , petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal

from an immigration judge’s decision denying her application for asylum,

withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”).

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

MAR 22 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 15

- 73425

We ha ve jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence

the agency’s factual findings. Conde Quevedo v. Barr , 947 F.3d 1238, 1241 (9th

Cir. 2020). We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s determinatio n that Medina

Damacio failed to establish the harm she experienced or fears in Mexico was or

would be on account of a protected ground. See Zetino v. Holder , 622 F.3d 1007,

1016 (9th Cir. 2010) (an applicant’s “desire to be free from harassment by

crimina ls motivated by theft or random violence by gang members bears no nexus

to a protected ground”). We do not address Medina Damacio ’s contentions as to

the cognizability of a proposed particular social group because the BIA did not

deny relief on this groun d

. See Santiago

- Rodriguez v. Holder , 657 F.3d 820, 829

(9th Cir. 2011) (“In reviewing the decision of the BIA, we consider only the

grounds relied upon by that agency.” (citation and internal quotation marks

omitted)). Thus, Medina Damacio ’s asylum and withholding of removal cl aims

fail.

Substa ntial evidence also supports the agency’s denial of CAT relief because

Medina Damacio failed to show it is more likely than not she would be tortured by

or with the consent or acquiescence of the government if returned to Mexico

. See

Aden v. Holder , 589 F.3d 1040, 1047 (9th Cir. 2009).3 15

- 73425

The temporary stay of removal remains i n place until issuance of the

mandate.

PETITION FOR REV IEW DENIED

.
```

[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 218 (Monday, November 13, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 66215]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9178]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Notice of Opportunity for Public Comment on Surplus Property 
Release at Henry Tift Myers Airport, Tifton, GA

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the provisions of Title 49, U.S.C. Section 47153(c), 
notice is being given that the FAA is considering a request from the 
City of Tifton and Tift County to waive the requirement that 
approximately 2-acres of surplus property, located at the Henry Tift 
Myers Airport, be used for aeronautical purposes.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before December 13, 2006.

ADDRESSES: Comments on this notice may be mailed or delivered in 
triplicate to the FAA at the following address: Atlanta Airports 
District Office, Attn: Chuck Garrison, Program Manager, 1701 Columbia 
Ave., Suite 2-260, Atlanta, GA 30337-2747.
    In addition, one copy of any comments submitted to the FAA must be 
mailed or delivered to Robert G. Anderson, M.D., Chairman, Tifton-Tift 
County Airport Authority at the following address: Henry Tift Myers 
Airport, Post Office Box 826, Tifton, GA 31793.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Chuck Garrison, Program Manager, 
Atlanta Airports District Office, 1701 Columbia Ave., Suite 2-260, 
Atlanta, GA 30337-2747, (404) 305-7145. The application may be reviewed 
in person at this same location.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA is reviewing a request by the City 
of Tifton and Tift County to release approximately 2 acres of surplus 
property at the Henry Tift Myers Airport. The property consists of one 
parcel located South of Tifton Eldorado Road (Formerly, Lower 
Brookfield Road), and to the West of Tri County Road. This property is 
currently shown on the approved Airport Layout Plan as aeronautical use 
land; however the property is currently not being used for aeronautical 
purposes and the proposed use of this property is compatible with 
airport operations. The City/County will ultimately use this land to 
acquire a 2.33 acre parcel located south of Washington Street, and East 
of Highway 41 South. The Washington Street property is located within 
the FAR Part 77 Primary and Transitional Approach Surfaces for a 
Precision Instrument Runway, and will be used to protect the approach 
surface to Runway 15.
    Any person may inspect the request in person at the FAA office 
listed above under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. In addition, any 
person may, upon request, inspect the request, notice and other 
documents germane to the request in person at the Henry Tift Myers 
Airport.

    Issued in Atlanta, Georgia on October 23, 2006.
Scott L. Seritt,
Manager, Atlanta Airports District Office, Southern Region.
[FR Doc. 06-9178 Filed 11-9-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
```