alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 7
Editorial Note: The Alphabetical Listing is updated annually by the Office of the Federal Register.

§ 7.71 Delaware Water Gap National Recreation Area. ( a ) *Powerless flight.* The use of devices designed to carry persons through the air in powerless flight is allowed at times and locations designated by the superintendent, pursuant to the terms and conditions of a permit.
( b ) *Designated snowmobile routes.* ( 1 ) A route in Middle Smithfield Township, Monroe County, Pennsylvania, bounded by the Delaware River on the east and Hidden Lake on the west. The route begins at the Smithfield Beach parking area and is in two loops. Loop One is a small trail approximately 3 miles long and follows the west bank of the Delaware River and closely parallels the east side of L. R. 45012 (commonly known as the River Road). Loop Two is approximately 6 miles long and begins at the northwest end of Loop One; it goes northeasterly between the Delaware River and River Road for about one mile until it crosses River Road; then southwesterly along the ridge which is south of Hidden Lake to a point opposite the west end of Hidden Lake, and then goes southeasterly until it returns to Loop One near River Road. Maps of the route are available at Smithfield Beach and at the office of the superintendent. Both loops are marked by appropriate signs.
( 2 ) [Reserved]
( c ) *Commercial vehicles.* Notwithstanding the prohibition of commercial vehicles set forth in § 5.6 of this chapter, commercial vehicles are authorized to use the portions of U.S. Highway 209 located within the Delaware Water Gap National Recreation Area in accordance with applicable law. The Superintendent will provide notice to the public about rules related to commercial vehicles, including the requirements of a fee and permit program, using the methods set forth in § 1.7 of this chapter.
( d ) *Fishing.* Unless otherwise designated, fishing in any manner authorized under applicable State law is allowed.
[34 FR 13595, Aug. 23, 1969, as amended at 47 FR 4256, Jan. 29, 1982; 48 FR 30295, June 30, 1983; 48 FR 46780, 46782, Oct. 14, 1983; 49 FR 9421, Mar. 13, 1984; 49 FR 18451, Apr. 30, 1984; 50 FR 34130, Aug. 23, 1985; 51 FR 40419, Nov. 7, 1986; 52 FR 34777, Sept. 15, 1987; 69 FR 57181, Sept. 24, 2004; 84 FR 29083, June 21, 2019]
BILLING CODE: 6715-01-M

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE:

THURSDAY, JULY 28, 2022 AT 10:00 A.M.

PLACE:

HYBRID MEETING: 1050 FIRST STREET, N.E. WASHINGTON, D.C. (12TH FLOOR) 

AND VIRTUAL. 

NOTE: FOR THOSE ATTENDING THE MEETING IN PERSON, CURRENT COVID-19 

SAFETY PROTOCOLS FOR VISITORS, WHICH ARE BASED ON THE CDC COVID-19 

COMMUNITY LEVEL IN WASHINGTON, D.C., WILL BE UPDATED ON THE 

COMMISSION’S CONTACT PAGE BY THE MONDAY BEFORE THE MEETING. SEE 

THE CONTACT PAGE AT https://www.fec.gov/contact/. IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO 

VIRTUALLY ACCESS THE MEETING, SEE THE INSTRUCTIONS BELOW.

STATUS:

THIS MEETING WILL BE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC, SUBJECT TO THE ABOVEREFERENCED GUIDANCE REGARDING THE COVID-19 COMMUNITY LEVEL AND 

CORRESPONDING HEALTH AND SAFETY PROCEDURES. TO ACCESS THE 

MEETING VIRTUALLY, GO TO THE COMMISSION’S WEBSITE www.fec.gov AND 

CLICK ON THE BANNER TO BE TAKEN TO THE MEETING PAGE.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Draft Advisory Opinion 2022-06: Hispanic Leadership Trust

Draft Advisory Opinion 2022-10: Sprinkle

Resubmission – Audit Division Recommendation Memorandum on the 

Kentucky State Democratic Central Executive Committee (A19-13)

Resubmission – Audit Division Recommendation Memorandum on the 

Democratic Party of Arkansas (A19-15)

Proposed Final Audit Report on the Association for Emergency 

Responders and Firefighters, PAC (A19-21)

Proposed Final Audit Report on the US Veterans Assistance Foundation, 

PAC (A19-06)

Management and Administrative Matters

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Judith Ingram, Press Officer

Telephone: (202) 694-1220

Authority: Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b

Individuals who plan to attend in person and who require special assistance, such as 

sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should contact Laura 
E. Sinram, Acting Secretary and Clerk, at (202) 694-1040, at least 72 hours prior to the 

meeting date.

Signed: _____________________________________

Vicktoria J. Allen

Acting Deputy Secretary of the Commission

Submitted: July 20, 2022
# CongressionalCandidate Table 3d
§ 1301.3 Policy council and policy committee. ( a ) *Establishing policy councils and policy committees.* Each agency must establish and maintain a policy council responsible for the direction of the Head Start program at the agency level, and a policy committee at the delegate level. If an agency delegates operational responsibility for the entire Head Start program to one delegate agency, the policy council and policy committee may be the same body.
( b ) *Composition.* ( 1 ) A program must establish a policy council in accordance with section 642(c)(2)(B) of the Act, or a policy committee at the delegate level in accordance with section 642(c)(3) of the Act, as early in the program year as possible. Parents of children currently enrolled in each program option must be proportionately represented on the policy council and on the policy committee at the delegate level.
( 2 ) The program must ensure members of the policy council, and of the policy committee at the delegate level, do not have a conflict of interest pursuant to sections 642(c)(2)(C) and 642(c)(3)(B) of the Act. Staff may not serve on the policy council or policy committee at the delegate level except parents who occasionally substitute as staff. In the case of tribal grant recipients, this exclusion applies only to tribal staff who work in areas directly related to or which directly impact administrative, fiscal, or programmatic issues.
( c ) *Duties and responsibilities.* ( 1 ) A policy council is responsible for activities specified at section 642(c)(2)(D) of the Act. A policy committee must approve and submit to the delegate agency its decisions in each of the following areas referenced at section 642(c)(2)(D)(i) through (vii) of the Act.
( 2 ) A policy council, and a policy committee at the delegate level, must use ongoing monitoring results, data on school readiness goals, other information described in § 1302.102, and information described in section 642(d)(2) of the Act to conduct its responsibilities.
( d ) *Term.* ( 1 ) A member will serve for one year.
( 2 ) If the member intends to serve for another year, s/he must stand for re-election.
( 3 ) The policy council, and policy committee at the delegate level, must include in its bylaws how many one-year terms, not to exceed five terms, a person may serve.
( 4 ) A program must seat a successor policy council, or policy committee at the delegate level, before an existing policy council, or policy committee at the delegate level, may be dissolved.
( e ) *Reimbursement.* A program must enable low-income members to participate fully in their policy council or policy committee responsibilities by providing, if necessary, reimbursements for reasonable expenses incurred by the low-income members.
[81 FR 61412, Sept. 6, 2016, as amended at 89 FR 67805, Aug. 21, 2024]
§ 1174.18 Parties' rights to review documents. ( a ) Once the ALJ issues a hearing notice pursuant to § 1174.12, and upon written request to the reviewing official, the defendant may: ( 1 ) Review any relevant and material documents, transcripts, records, and other materials that relate to the allegations set out in the complaint and upon which the investigating official based his or her findings and conclusions, unless such documents are subject to a privilege under Federal law, and obtain copies of such documents upon payment of duplication fees; and
( 2 ) Obtain a copy of all exculpatory information in the reviewing official's or investigating official's possession that relates to the allegations in the complaint, even if it appears in a document that would otherwise be privileged. If the document would otherwise be privileged, the other party only must disclose the portion containing exculpatory information.
( b ) The notice that the reviewing official sends to the Attorney General, as described in § 1174.5(b), is not discoverable under any circumstances.
( c ) If the reviewing official does not respond to the defendant's request within twenty days, the defendant may file with the ALJ a motion to compel disclosure of the documents, subject to the provisions of this section. The defendant may only file such a motion with the ALJ after filing an answer pursuant to § 1174.9.
§ 1156.21 Exhaustion of administrative remedies. ( a ) A complainant may file a civil action following the exhaustion of administrative remedies under the Act. Administrative remedies are exhausted if: ( 1 ) 180 days have elapsed since the complainant filed the complaint and the Endowment has made no finding with regard to the complaint; or
( 2 ) The Endowment issues a finding in favor of the recipient.
( b ) If the Endowment fails to make a finding within 180 days or issues a finding in favor of the recipient, the Endowment will: ( 1 ) Promptly advise the complainant if either of the conditions of paragraph (a) of this section has been met;
( 2 ) Advise the complainant of his or her right to bring a civil action for injunctive relief that will effect the purpose of the Act;
( 3 ) Inform the complainant: ( i ) That the complainant may bring a civil action only in the United States district court for the district in which the recipient is located or transacts business;
( ii ) That a complainant prevailing in a civil action has the right to be awarded the costs of the action, including reasonable attorney's fees, but that the complainant must demand these costs in the complaint;
( iii ) That before commencing the action the complainant shall give 30 days notice by registered mail to the Chairperson of the Endowment, the Secretary, the Attorney General of the United States, and the recipient;
( iv ) That the notice must state: the alleged violation of the Act; the relief requested; the court in which the complainant is bringing the action; and whether or not the attorney's fees are demanded in the event the complainant prevails; and
( v ) That the complainant may not bring an action if the same alleged violation of the Act by the same recipient is the subject of a pending action in any court of the United States.
#### Dahash v. Flanders, appellant.

*Appeal from, County Court—failure to move for new trial.*

Defendant appealed from a judgment entered in the county court upon the verdict of a jury, without moving for a new trial in that court. *Held,*irregular and the appeal dismissed.

Appeal from a judgment of the county court of Niagara in an action originating in a justice’s court. The only question passed upon is one of practice in taking the appeal. .

*J. L. & J. H. Buck,*for appellant.

*S. B. Piper,*for respondent.

E. Darwin Smith, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the county court of Niagara county. The case arose in a justice’s court, was appealed to and retried in the county court and judgment perfected upon the verdict, from which the defendant appealed to this court upon a case, not having made any motion thereon for a new trial in the county court. In *Bliss*v. *Swab,*48 Barb. 342, I expressed the opinion that this court should only review the decisions of county judges on the trial of causes after a motion for a new trial was made in that court, and should be confined to the reviews of the deliberate decision of that court after argument. In this view I understand my brethren in this department have concurred, but the decision has not, that I am aware of, been reported. It was followed in *Hacher*v. *Ferrell,*decided at the April term, and has been followed also in several cases during the year, and the appeals dismissed. In this case the appeal must therefore be dismissed.

*Appeal*dismissed.
III 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 35 

Authorizing the use of the rotunda and Emancipation Hall of the Capitol 

by the Joint Congressional Committee on Inaugural Ceremonies in connection with the proceedings and ceremonies conducted for the inauguration of the President-elect and the Vice President-elect of the United 

States. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 2, 2024 

Ms. KLOBUCHAR (for herself and Mrs. FISCHER) submitted the following 

concurrent resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the use of the rotunda and Emancipation Hall 

of the Capitol by the Joint Congressional Committee 

on Inaugural Ceremonies in connection with the proceedings and ceremonies conducted for the inauguration 

of the President-elect and the Vice President-elect of 

the United States. 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), 

3 SECTION 1. USE OF THE ROTUNDA AND EMANCIPATION 

4 HALL OF THE CAPITOL. 

5 The rotunda and Emancipation Hall of the Capitol 

6 are authorized to be used on January 20, 2025, by the 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•SCON 35 ATS 

1 Joint Congressional Committee on Inaugural Ceremonies 

2 in connection with the proceedings and ceremonies con3 ducted for the inauguration of the President-elect and the 

4 Vice President-elect of the United States. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Exhibit
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the report of Hong Kong Highpower Technology, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the period ending December 31, 2007 as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
      each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below,
      hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





(1) The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
                Dang Yu PanYu
                Dang Yu PanChief
                Executive OfficerJune
                13, 2008/s/
                Yu Zhi QiuYu
                Zhi QiuChief
                Financial OfficerJune
                13, 2008





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided to Hong Kong Highpower Technology, Inc. and will be retained by Hong
      Kong Highpower Technology, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit
32


Section
1350 Certifications








STATEMENT
FURNISHED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The
undersigned is the Chief Executive Officer and Treasurer or Principal Accounting
Officer of Lightbridge Corporation. This Certification is made pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.  This Certification
accompanies the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Lightbridge Corporation for the
three months ended September 30, 2009.





The
undersigned certifies that such 10-Q Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in such 10-Q Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Lightbridge
Corporation as of September 30, 2009.





This
Certification is executed as of November 12, 2009.





By:
      /s/ Seth GraeName:
      Seth GraeTitle:
      President, Chief Executive Officer and Director(Principal
      Executive Officer)By:
      /s/ James GuerraName:
      James GuerraTitle:
      Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial Officer and Principal Accounting
  Officer)




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Lightbridge Corporation and will be retained by Lightbridge Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.





The
forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether
made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation
language in such filing.
#### § 5.1 Advertisements.

Commercial notices or advertisements shall not be displayed, posted, or distributed on federally owned or controlled lands within a park area unless prior written permission has been given by the Superintendent. Such permission may be granted only if the notice or advertisement is of goods, services, or facilities available within the park area and such notices and advertisements are found by the Superintendent to be desirable and necessary for the convenience and guidance of the public.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                             113,805
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       69,239
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                         11,521
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   194,895
<PP&E>                                              63,434
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     264,405
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              252,563
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            11,416
<OTHER-SE>                                               0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       264,405
<SALES>                                          1,135,399
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,135,399
<CGS>                                              341,721
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,240,248
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   7,843
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (104,849)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (104,849)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (104,849)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.01)


</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Melville Collins, Respondent, *v.*William McLaughlin, as Warden of the City Prison in Kings County, Appellant.

Habeas corpus — important issues not to be determined.

Except in rare cases where the facts before the court cannot be materially changed, qualified or explained, important issues should not be determined in a habeas corpus proceeding.

*People ex rel. Gollins*v. *McLaughlin,*128 App. Div. 599, appeal dismissed.

(Argued January 6, 1909;

decided January 26, 1909.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered *557November 20, 1908, which affirmed an order of Special Term sustaining a writ of habeas corpus and discharging the relator from custody.

*John F.*Clarke, *District Attorney (Robert H. Elder*of counsel), for appellant.

*Joseph S.*Auerbach, *De Lancey*Nicoll, *John B. Stanchfield*and *Charles H. Tuttle*for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

The relator is charged with violating section 351 of the Penal Code, as amended by chapter 507, Laws of 1908, in that he did receive a certain sum of money, to wit, five dollars, bet upon a certain horse race about to be run, and which was run on the Gravesend race track, in the borough of Brooklyn, New York; he was arrested, sued out a writ of habeas corpus, which was duly sustained by the Special Term and Appellate Division, and he is now at liberty.

The district attorney disclaims any responsibility for the preparation of the information upon which the warrant against the defendant was issued, and asserts that he is compelled to make this a test case relating to such important act against his protest. The defendant waived examination when brought before the magistrate and there has been no oral examination of witnesses relating to the facts and circumstances involved. There is great doubt whether the facts in this case have been so carefully and thoroughly developed as to justify a determination of the important questions discussed by counsel in this proceeding. We are of the opinion that except in rare cases where the facts before the court cannot be materially changed, qualified or explained the determination of important issues ought not to be made in a habeas corpus proceeding, as it is not calculated to thoroughly develop the facts as in the case when a regular trial is had, witnesses examined and cross-examined, alleged errors reviewed on appeal, and counsel present throughout, protecting the interests of both parties.

The Supreme Court of the United States has recently announced its adherence to this doctrine. In *Riggins*v. *United States*(199 U. S. 547, 548), Mr. Chief Justice Fuller states : “ Ordinarily the writ will not be granted when there *558is a remedy by writ of error or appeal, yet in rare and exceptional cases it may be issued, although such remedy exists.” (See, also, *In re*Lincoln, 202 U. S. 178; *Urquhart*v. Brown, 205 U. S. 179.)

This appeal must be dismissed, with costs.

Cullen, Ch. J., Edward T. Bartlett, Vann, Werner, Willard'Bartlett, Hisoock and Chase, JJ., concur.

Appeal dismissed.