alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.3







                              CERTIFICATE OF TRUST

                                       OF

                              JPM CAPITAL TRUST I


                 This Certificate of Trust is being executed as of October 29,
1996 for the purpose of organizing a business trust pursuant to the Delaware
Business Trust Act, 12 Del. C. Sections 3801 et seq. (the "Act").

                 The undersigned hereby certifies as follows:

                 1.       Name.  The name of the business trust is "JPM Capital
Trust I" (the "Trust").

                 2.       Delaware Trustee.  The name and business address of
the Delaware resident trustee of the Trust meeting the requirements of Section
3807 of the Act are as follows:

                          Wilmington Trust Company
                          Rodney Square North
                          1100 North Market Street
                          Wilmington, Delaware 19890

                 3.       Effective.  This Certificate of Trust shall be
effective immediately upon filing in the Office of the Secretary of State of
the State of Delaware.
<PAGE>   2
                 4.       Counterparts.  This Certificate of Trust may be
executed in one or more counterparts.

                 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, being all of the trustees
of the Trust, have duly executed this Certificate of Trust as of the day and
year first above written.

                                           WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY,
                                           as Delaware Trustee


                                           by:     /s/ Norma P. Close
                                                ------------------------
                                                   Name:    Norma P. Close
                                                   Title:   Vice President



                                              /s/ H. Christian Raymond
                                           ------------------------------
                                           H. Christian Raymond
                                           Trustee



                                              /s/ Andrew G. Kerber
                                           ------------------------------
                                           Andrew G. Kerber
                                           Trustee



                                              /s/ Susan L. McCullin
                                           ------------------------------
                                           Susan L. McCullin
                                           Trustee
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 21 (Wednesday, February 1, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5329-5331]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-935]



[[Page 5329]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK

[Public Notice 79]


Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; 
Comment Request

AGENCY: Export Import Bank of the U.S.

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Export-Import Bank, as a part of its continuing effort to 
reduce paperwork and respondent burden, invites the general public and 
other Federal Agencies to comment on the proposed information 
collection, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The 
form will be used by Banks to apply for comprehensive or political 
insurance coverage on foreign banks for letter of credit transactions.
    Our customers will be able to submit this form on paper or 
electronically.

DATES: Written comments should be received on or before April 3, 2006 
to be assured of consideration.

ADDRESSES: Direct all comments and requests for additional information 
to Walter Kosciow, Export-Import Bank of the U.S., 811 Vermont Avenue, 
NW., Washington, DC 20571, (202) 565-3649.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Title and Form Number: Export-Import Bank of the United States 
Application for Issuing Bank Credit Limit (IBCL) Under Bank Letter of 
Credit Policy, EIB 92-36.
    OMB Number: None.
    Type of Review: Regular.
    Need and Use: The information requested enables the applicant to 
provide Ex-Im Bank with the information necessary to process credit 
risk applications involving foreign letter of credit issuing banks.
    Affected Public: The form affects entities involved in the export 
of U.S. goods and services.
    Estimated Annual Respondents: 60.
    Estimated Time Per Respondent: 20 minutes.
    Estimated Annual Burden: 240.
    Frequency of Reporting or Use: 1 to 12 times per year depending on 
the particular respondent's need/risk portfolio.

    Dated: January 26, 2006.
Solomon Bush,
Agency Clearance Officer.
BILLING CODE 6690-01-M

[[Page 5330]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN01FE06.136


[[Page 5331]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN01FE06.137

[FR Doc. 06-935 Filed 1-31-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6690-01-C
**Exhibit
      23.1**





**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**




We
          consent to the in corporation
          by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-10815, 333-10817,
          333-28267, 333-28269, 333-39590, 333-57653, 333-105866 and 333-134998 on
          Form
          S-8 of our reports dated March 5, 2007, relating to the financial
          statements and financial statement schedule of Rural Cellular Corporation
          and
          Subsidiaries (the “Company”), which report expresses an unqualified opinion
          and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the Company’s adoption of
          Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (R), *Share-Based
          Payment* ,
          on
          January 1, 2006, and management’s report on the effectiveness of internal
          control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form
          10-K
          of Rural Cellular Corporation for the year ended December 31,
          2006.
 
 /s/
          Deloitte & Touche LLP
 
 Minneapolis,
          Minnesota
 March
          5,
          2007
INFOCROSSING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                                  EXHIBIT 10.5B


                         CONSULTING AGREEMENT AMENDMENT



Parties


This agreement is made as of October 31, 1994 by the parties to the CONSULTING
AGREEMENT dated November 1, 1992 to amend the CONSULTING AGREEMENT ("Agreement")
between COMPUTER OUTSOURCING SERVICES, INC. a new York corporation with an
address at 360 West 31st Street, New York, New York 10001 ("Company"), and
STANLEY BERGER, an individual formerly residing at 11 Old Long Ridge Road,
Stamford, CT. ("Consultant"), now residing at 20 Church Street, Greenwich, CT.
06830.


AMENDMENTS

1.       Consulting Services; Term.

Section 2(a) The "Term" of the agreement is amended to extended the "term" to
September 31, 2001.

2.       Payments to Consultant.
         ----------------------

Section 3(a). The Consulting Fee for the Company's FYE October 31, 1994 is
revised and shall equal $222,917. The Consulting Fee for the FYE October 31,
1995 is revised and shall equal $245, 209. The Consulting Fee shall be $22,292
for each month of the period commencing November 1, 2000 through September 31,
2001.

Section 3(b).  Delete entire Subsection 3 (b).

Section 3(c). The Company is not required to contribute $30,000 to an annuity
purchase for the years ending December 31, 1993 and 1994.


                                     GENERAL

The Agreement dated November 1, 1992 is modified to incorporate the above
amendments. All other terms and conditions of the Agreement remain unchanged.










                                     X - 2
<PAGE>


Consulting Agreement Amendment
Page 2 of 2




Execution

The parties hereto, desiring to be bound hereby, have executed this Agreement as
of the date first written above.



COMPUTER OUTSOURCING SERVICES, INC.


BY:              /s/
   ___________________________________           Date: ___________________
         Zach Lonstein, President

                /s/
   __________________________________
       Stanley Berger, individually

































                                     X - 3
§ 157.206 Qualified employer participation process in a SHOP for plan years beginning on or after January 1, 2018. ( a ) *General requirements.* When joining the SHOP, a qualified employer must comply with the requirements, processes, and timelines set forth by this part and must remain in compliance for the duration of the employer's participation in the SHOP.
( b ) *Selecting QHPs.* During an election period, a qualified employer may make coverage in a QHP available through the SHOP in accordance with the processes developed by the SHOP in accordance with § 155.706 of this subchapter.
( c ) *Information dissemination to employees.* A qualified employer participating in the SHOP must disseminate information to its qualified employees about the process to enroll in a QHP through the SHOP.
( d ) *Employees hired outside of the initial or annual open enrollment period.* Qualified employers must provide employees hired outside of the initial or annual open enrollment period with information about the enrollment process.
( e ) *Participation in the SHOP and termination of coverage or enrollment through the SHOP.* ( 1 ) Changes affecting participation. Employers must submit a new single employer application to the SHOP or withdraw from participating in the SHOP if the employer makes a change that could end its eligibility under § 155.710 of this subchapter.
( 2 ) If an employer receives a determination of ineligibility to participate in the SHOP or the SHOP terminates its eligibility to participate in the SHOP, unless the SHOP notifies the issuer or issuers of the determination of ineligibility or termination of eligibility, the employer must notify the issuer or issuers of QHPs in which their group members are enrolled in coverage of its ineligibility or termination of eligibility within 5 business days of the end of any applicable appeal process under § 155.741 of this subchapter, which could include when the time to file an appeal lapses without an appeal being filed, when the appeal is rejected or dismissed, or when the appeal process concludes with an adjudication by the appeals entity, as applicable.
( 3 ) Employers must promptly notify the issuer or issuers of QHPs in which their group members are enrolled in coverage if it wishes to terminate coverage or enrollment through the SHOP, unless the SHOP notifies the issuer or issuers.
( f ) *Applicability date.* The provisions of this section apply for plan years beginning on or after January 1, 2018.
[83 FR 17070, Apr. 17, 2018]
#### § 271.7 Power to revoke.

It is the intention of the regulations in this part that the Chief, in exercising the authorities delegated hereunder, will at all times consider the primary purpose of fostering public information in the prevention of forest fires. All authorities and licenses granted under the regulations in this part shall be subject to abrogation by the Chief at any time he finds that the use involved is injurious to the purpose of forest fire prevention, is offensive to decency or good taste, or for similar reasons in addition to any other limitations and terms contained in the licenses.
§ 1336.68 Defaults, uncollectible loans, liquidations: Responsibilities of the Loan Administrator. ( a ) Prior to making loans from the RLF, the Loan Administrator will develop and obtain the Commissioner's approval for written procedures and definitions pertaining to defaults and collections of payments. (section 803A(b)(4))
( b ) The Loan Administrator will provide a copy of such procedures and definitions to each applicant for a loan at the time the application is made. (section 803A(b)(4))
( c ) The Loan Administrator will report to the Commissioner whenever a loan recipient is 90 days in arrears in the repayment of principal or interest or has failed to comply with the terms of the loan agreement. After making reasonable efforts to collect amounts payable, as specified in the written procedures, the Loan Administrator shall notify the Commissioner whenever a loan is uncollectible at reasonable cost. The notice shall include recommendations for future action to be taken by the Loan Administrator. (section 803A(c)(1) and (2))
( d ) Upon receiving such notices, the Commissioner will, as appropriate, instruct the Loan Administrator: ( 1 ) To demand the immediate and full repayment of the loan;
( 2 ) To continue with its collection activities;
( 3 ) To cancel, adjust, compromise, or reduce the amount of such loan;
( 4 ) To modify any term or condition of such loan, including any term or condition relating to the rate of interest or the time of payment of any installment of principal or interest, or portion thereof, that is payable under such loan;
( 5 ) To discontinue any further advance of funds contemplated by the loan agreement;
( 6 ) To take possession of any or all collateral given as security and in the case of individuals, corporations, partnerships or cooperative associations, the property purchased with the borrowed funds;
( 7 ) To prosecute legal action against the borrower or against the officers of the borrowing organization;
( 8 ) To prevent further disbursement of credit funds under the control of the borrower;
( 9 ) To assign or sell at a public or private sale, or otherwise dispose of for cash or credit any evidence of debt, contract, claim, personal or real property or security assigned to or held by the Loan Administrator; or
( 10 ) To liquidate or arrange for the operation of economic enterprises financed with the revolving loan until the indebtedness is paid or until the Loan Administrator has received acceptable assurance of its repayment and compliance with the terms of the loan agreement. (Section 803A(c)(2)(B))
Case 1:20-cv-01778-RCL   Document 14   Filed 10/14/20   Page 1 of 2

Case 1:20-cv-01778-RCL   Document 14   Filed 10/14/20   Page 2 of 2
§ 16.18 Mediation. ( a ) *In cases pending before the Board.* If the Board decides that mediation would be useful to resolve a dispute, the Board, in consultation with the parties, may suggest use of mediation techniques and will provide or assist in selecting a mediator. The mediator may take any steps agreed upon by the parties to resolve the dispute or clarify issues. The results of mediation are not binding on the parties unless the parties so agree in writing. The Board will internally insulate the mediator from any Board or staff members assigned to handle the appeal.
( b ) *In other cases.* In any other grants dispute, the Board may, within the limitations of its resources, offer persons trained in mediation skills to aid in resolving the dispute. Mediation services will only be offered at the request, or with the concurrence, of a responsible federal program official in the program under which the dispute arises. The Board will insulate the mediator if any appeal subsequently arises from the dispute.
Need to return call by / at/between and . Signature: ___________________________ Project No.: 0172.07.029.030 DISTRIBUTION

Page _1 _ of __2_

Project Name: Steam Electric Detailed Study

TELEPHONE CALL RECORD

Outgoing Call Date: 12/2/09 Time: 2:00 pm EST

Company Name: Tampa Electric’s Big Bend Power Plant Contact Name: Kevin Young (Big Bend) and Donna Hill (UWAG)

Phone No .: 813-228-4232

Name: Kurt Blohm Eastern Research Group

GENERAL SUBJECT : Tampa Electric’s Big Bend Power Plan t FGD Wastewater Treatment System

TOPICS DISCUSSED AND ACTION TAKEN

On Wednesday, December 2, 2009, I contacted Kevin You ng of Big Bend Power Plant (Big Bend) and left a message for him to call me back to discuss Big Bend’s FGD System and FGD Wastewater treatment system. I explained that EPA is will be conducting sampling episod es at several power plants to collect wastewater samples from FGD wastewater treatme nt systems, and that the informa tion collected on th e call would help

EPA make decisions about facilities it may sample during the rulema king. Shortly after I left the message,

Kevin called back with Donna Hill of Utility Water Act Gr oup (UWAG) on the line.

Mr. Young stated that there are four generating units on site, all of which burn eastern bituminous coal. There are two limestone forced oxidation FGD systems on site. Units 1 and 2 exhaust to one FGD system, while Units 3 and 4 exhaust to the other FGD system. Both FGD systems use dibasic acid additive.

Mr. Young stated that Units 2, 3, and 4 operate SCRs for NO

x removal. Big Bend is pl anning to begin operation on the Unit 1 SCR in May 2010. The SCRs all operate on a year-round basis.

Mr. Young confirmed that the FGD wastewater treatmen t plant consists of the following unit operations:

 Equalization tank;

 pH adjustment (lime addition);

 Ferric chloride addition;

 Mixing tank;

 Flocculating polymer addition;

 Clarification;

o Overflow to pH adjustment (hydrochloric acid addition);

o Underflow to filter press; and

o Filtrate recycled back to equalization tank.

 Filtration.

Mr. Young stated that the purpose of the lime is to adju st the pH for the addition of ferric chloride. The ferric chloride precipitates out constituents in the wastewater. The hydrochloric aci d is used as a final pH adjustment prior to discharge. The effluent of the wastewater treatment system is combined with once-through cooling water prior to discharge. The wast ewater treatment system is operate d continuously during normal operation.Need to return call by / at/between and . Signature: ___________________________ Mr. Young stated that Big Bend has re gular outages during the Spring, but that he did not know the specific dates of the outages. Ms. Hill stated that the dates of outages are considered confidential information. Mr. Young gave me his email address and told me to fo llow up on the questions he was unable to answer.
Swanson. Brian (OST) b&T^gSP '2JDO0 - (bf ^ 3 

From: Rowan Kaulaelae Pa [rowan3@hawaii.edu] r' H i !viLi-!T Ur 

Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2012 6:06 PM iSPORTAilON 

To: EAS(OST) '/.'I'T ^^pFRATiONS 

Subject: Answer to Pacific Wings' Petition for Reconsideration 

rxi m 2- P h 30 

My name is Rowan Pa and I support Makani Kai to be the award recipient of the contract 

chartering people to and from Kalaupapa.
**Exhibit 31.2**
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Lance K. Bradford, as the Chief Financial Officer of Vestin Group, Inc.,certify that:
1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB of Vestin Group, Inc. 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofVestin Group, Inc. as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. Vestin Group, Inc.’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for Vestin Group,Inc. and have:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to VestinGroup, Inc., including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and34-47986  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of Vestin Group, Inc.’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report basedon such evaluations; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any changes in Vestin Group, Inc.’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred duringVestin Group, Inc.’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect Vestin Group,Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting; and;
5. Vestin Group, Inc.’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to Vestin Group, Inc.’s auditors and the audit committee ofVestin Group, Inc.’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal controls over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect Vestin Group, Inc.’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in Vestin Group,Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: May 17, 2004 /s/ Lance K. BradfordLance K. BradfordChief Financial OfficerVestin Group, Inc.
33
II 

Calendar No. 5 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 81 

To provide a moratorium on all Federal research grants provided to any 

institution of higher education or other research institute that is conducting gain-of-function research. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 25, 2023 

Mr. MARSHALL (for himself, Mr. PAUL, Ms. ERNST, Mr. TUBERVILLE, Mrs. 

BLACKBURN, Mr. BRAUN, Mr. LANKFORD, Mr. RUBIO, Mr. COTTON, and 

Mr. WICKER) introduced the following bill; which was read the first time 

JANUARY 26, 2023 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar 

A BILL 

To provide a moratorium on all Federal research grants 

provided to any institution of higher education or other 

research institute that is conducting gain-of-function research. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Viral Gain-of-Function 

5 Research Moratorium Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 81 PCS

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON FEDERAL RESEARCH GRANTS 

2 FOR INSTITUTIONS AND RESEARCH INSTI3 TUTES CONDUCTING GAIN-OF-FUNCTION RE4 SEARCH. 

5 (a) DEFINITION OF GAIN-OF-FUNCTION RE6 SEARCH.—In this section, the term ‘‘gain-of-function re7 search’’ means any research that— 

8 (1) could confer attributes to influenza, MERS, 

9 or SARS viruses such that the virus would have en10 hanced pathogenicity or transmissibility in any orga11 nism; or 

12 (2) involves methods that could enhance poten13 tial pandemic pathogens or related risky research 

14 with potentially dangerous pathogens. 

15 (b) PROHIBITION.—Notwithstanding any other provi16 sion of law, no research grants supported by Federal funds 

17 may be awarded to institutions of higher education, or 

18 other research institutes, that are conducting gain-of-func19 tion research. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 5 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 81 

A BILL 

To provide a moratorium on all Federal research 

ducting gain-of-function research. cation or other research institute that is congrants provided to any institution of higher eduJANUARY 26, 2023 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS