alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                      161382 
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                              7014651 
<ALLOWANCES>                                682079 
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           7231605 
<PP&E>                                    15525373 
<DEPRECIATION>                             1399125 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            25398032 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     30458527 
<BONDS>                                    2180904 
<COMMON>                                     15949 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                     17 
<OTHER-SE>                                (7257365)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              25398032 
<SALES>                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           6919018 
<CGS>                                      4902838 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              7539726 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            877226 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            669421 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         1070241 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (620708)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              0
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                               (620708)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (.04)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE J.H.
HEAFNER COMPANY, INC. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           3,880
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  107,339
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,104
<INVENTORY>                                    122,647
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               243,320
<PP&E>                                          49,978
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,405
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 411,015
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          201,297
<BONDS>                                        110,889
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           11,500
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            51
<OTHER-SE>                                      18,861
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   411,015
<SALES>                                        243,444
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               243,444
<CGS>                                          172,616
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  241,250
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   (28)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,497
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (2,275)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (837)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1,438)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 (2,198)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (3,636)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.91)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.70)


</TABLE>
|Exhibit 23.1
|------------



|CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED
|---------------------------------



|PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
|----------------------



|To the Board of DirectorsSan Joaquin Bancorp
|--------------------------------------------

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-153034 on Form S-8 of San Joaquin Bancorp of our reports dated March 12, 2009, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of San Joaquin Bancorp as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income, shareholders equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three year period ended December 31, 2008, and with respect to San Joaquin Bancorp managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which reports are included in this annual report on Form 10-K of San Joaquin Bancorp for the year ended December 31, 2008.

/s/ BROWN ARMSTRONG PAULDENMcCOWN STARBUCK THORNBURGH & KEETER 
ACCOUNTANCY CORPORATION



|Bakersfield, CaliforniaMarch 12, 2009
|-------------------------------------

---
§ 158.160 Other non-claims costs. ( a ) *General requirements.* The report required in § 158.110 of this subpart must include non-claims costs described in paragraph (b) of this section and must provide an explanation of how premium revenue is used, other than to provide reimbursement for clinical services covered by the benefit plan, expenditures for activities that improve health care quality, and Federal and State taxes and licensing or regulatory fees as specified in this part.
( b ) *Non-claims costs other than taxes and regulatory fees.* ( 1 ) The report required in § 158.110 of this subpart must include any expenses for administrative services that do not constitute adjustments to premium revenue as provided in § 158.130 of this subpart, reimbursement for clinical services to enrollees as defined in § 158.140 of this subpart, or expenditures on quality improvement activities as defined in §§ 158.150 and 158.151 of this subpart.
( 2 ) Expenses for administrative services include the following: ( i ) Cost-containment expenses not included as an expenditure related to an activity at § 158.150 of this subpart.
( ii ) Loss adjustment expenses not classified as a cost containment expense.
( iii ) Direct sales salaries, workforce salaries and benefits.
( iv ) Agents and brokers fees and commissions.
( v ) General and administrative expenses.
( vi ) Community benefit expenditures.
( vii ) Beginning with the 2022 MLR reporting year, prescription drug rebates and other price concessions that are received and retained by an entity providing pharmacy benefit management services to the issuer and are associated with administering the issuer's prescription drug benefits.
[75 FR 74921, Dec. 1, 2010, as amended at 85 FR 29262, May 14, 2020]
EXHIBIT 32.1

    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The  undersigned,  Garry E.  Wong,  the Chief  Executive  Officer  and the Chief
Financial Officer of Deer Bay Resources Inc. (the "Company"),  hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that, to his knowledge,  the Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended February 28, 2010,  fully complies with the requirements
of Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
and that the  information  contained  in the  Annual  Report  on Form  10-K,  as
amended,  fairly presents in all material  respects the financial  condition and
results of operations of the Company.

      Signature                             Title                       Date
      ---------                             -----                       ----

/s/ Garry E. Wong             President, Chief Executive Officer,   May 18, 2010
---------------------------   Chief Financial Officer, Secretary,
Garry E. Wong                 Treasurer and Director


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document  authenticating,  acknowledging,  or otherwise  adopting the signatures
that  appear  in typed  form  within  the  electronic  version  of this  written
statement  required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission
or its staff upon request.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF

JOSEPH ABRAHAM, JR., A/K/A

JOSEPH (SIB) ABRAHAM, JR.

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-18-00032-CV

Appeal from

Probate Court No. 1

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC # 2014-CPR02054)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the 

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. We further order that Appellee 

recover from Appellant and its sureties, if any, see TEX.R.APP.P. 43.5, on the judgment and all 

costs, for which let execution issue. This decision shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 21ST DAY OF AUGUST, 2019.

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7505
ROY SMITH, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JIM HUNT, Governor; FRANKLIN E. FREEMAN, JR.; RONNIE STEWART; JIMMY PRIVETTE, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (CA-94-318-BO) Submitted: February 7, 1996 Decided: February 22, 1996 Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Roy Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Mark J. Pletzke, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina; John A. Maxfield, COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Smith v. Hunt , No. CA-94-318-BO (E.D.N.C. Sept. 15, 1995).We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
§ 1181.160 Communications. ( a ) The agency shall take appropriate steps to ensure effective communication with applicants, participants, personnel of other Federal entities, and members of the public. ( 1 ) The agency shall furnish appropriate auxiliary aids where necessary to afford a handicapped person an equal opportunity to participate in, and enjoy the benefits of, a program or activity conducted by the agency. ( i ) In determining what type of auxiliary aid is necessary, the agency shall give primary consideration to the requests of the handicapped person.
( ii ) The agency need not provide individually prescribed devices, readers for personal use or study, or other devices of a personal nature.
( 2 ) Where the agency communicates with applicants and beneficiaries by telephone, telecommunication devices for deaf persons (TDD's) or equally effective telecommunication systems shall be used.
( b ) The agency shall ensure that interested persons, including persons with impaired vision or hearing, can obtain information as to the existence and location of accessible services, activities, and facilities.
( c ) The agency shall provide signage at a primary entrance to each of its inaccessible facilities, directing users to a location at which they can obtain information about accessible facilities. The international symbol for accessibility shall be used at each primary entrance of an accessible facility.
( d ) This section does not require the agency to take any action that it can demonstrate would result in a fundamental alteration in the nature of a program or activity or in undue financial and administrative burdens. In those circumstances where agency personnel believe that the proposed action would fundamentally alter the program or activity or would result in undue financial and administrative burdens, the agency has the burden of proving that compliance with § 1181.160 would result in such alteration or burdens. The decision that compliance would result in such alteration or burdens must be made by the agency head or his or her designee after considering all agency resources available for use in the funding and operation of the conducted program or activity, and must be accompanied by a written statement of the reasons for reaching that conclusion. If an action required to comply with this section would result in such an alteration or such burdens, the agency shall take any other action that would not result in such an alteration or such burdens but would nevertheless ensure that, to the maximum extent possible, handicapped persons receive the benefits and services of the program or activity.
#### § 504.7 Intoxicating beverages and narcotics.

Entering the premises or the operating of a motor vehicle thereon by a person under the influence of any intoxicating beverage or narcotic drug or the use of such drug in or on the premises is prohibited. Consumption of intoxicating beverages on the premises is prohibited unless officially authorized.
§ 162.406 Standard unique health identifier for health care providers. ( a ) *Standard.* The standard unique health identifier for health care providers is the National Provider Identifier (NPI). The NPI is a 10-position numeric identifier, with a check digit in the 10th position, and no intelligence about the health care provider in the number.
( b ) *Required and permitted uses for the NPI.* ( 1 ) The NPI must be used as stated in §§ 162.410, 162.412, and 162.414.
( 2 ) The NPI may be used for any other lawful purpose.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          24,327
<SECURITIES>                                    18,374
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,990
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (732)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                50,715
<PP&E>                                           8,926
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (4,679)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  55,322
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,673
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           451
<OTHER-SE>                                      40,198
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    55,322
<SALES>                                         33,653
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                33,653
<CGS>                                            8,326
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   38,925
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,039
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 128
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (11,559)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       121
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (11,680)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.67)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.67)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiary, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Thomas R. Johnson

Thomas R. JohnsonChief Executive Office andChief Financial Officer
 49
From: Danita Alberico 

To: Commissioners Office 

Cc: Debbie Chacona; Nataliya Ioffe; Patricia Orrock; Adav Noti; Lorenzo Holloway 

Subject: Kasich for America - Request for Consideration of a Legal Question 

Date: Tuesday, February 14, 2017 2:31:00 PM 

Attachments: Kasich Request for Consideration of Legal Question.pdf 

Commissioners, 

The Office of General Counsel and counsel for Kasich for America (the “Committee”) have 

resolved the Committee’s Request for Consideration of a Legal Question, dated January 19, 2017, 

through the informal resolution process specified in the Program for Requesting Consideration of 

Legal Questions by the Commission. 81 Fed. Reg. 29861 (May. 13, 2016). The Office of General 

Counsel, the Office of Compliance, and the Committee have agreed that the contributions at 

issue were compliant. Thus, the request for review process in this matter has concluded. 

If you have any questions or concerns, please let us know.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 11 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 11

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental 
Protection Agency relating to ``Control of Air Pollution From New Motor 
          Vehicles: Heavy-Duty Engine and Vehicle Standards''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Administrator of the Environmental Protection 
Agency relating to ``Control of Air Pollution From New Motor Vehicles: 
Heavy-Duty Engine and Vehicle Standards'' (88 Fed. Reg. 4296 (January 
24, 2023)), and such rule shall have no force or effect.

            Passed the Senate April 26, 2023.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
118th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                             S. J. RES. 11

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental 
Protection Agency relating to ``Control of Air Pollution From New Motor 
          Vehicles: Heavy-Duty Engine and Vehicle Standards''.
```
EXHIBIT 32.1 SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, I, Steve Frickenstein, Chief Executive Officer of
Breda Telephone Corp., certify that to my knowledge (i) Breda Telephone Corp.s
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Breda Telephone Corp. Date: August
 14, 2008/s/ Steve
 FrickensteinSteve
 Frickenstein, Chief Executive Officer E-5
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

No. 22-5140 September Term, 2022

 FILED ON: MAY 19, 2023

CAMPAIGN LEGAL CENTER,

APPELLEE

v.

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION,

APPELLEE

HERITAGE ACTION FOR AMERICA,

APPELLANT

Consolidated with 22-5167

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the District of Columbia

(No. 1:21-cv-00406)

Before: HENDERSON and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and ROGERS, Senior Circuit Judge

J U D G M E N T

These causes came on to be heard on the record on appeal from the United States District

Court for the District of Columbia and were argued by counsel. On consideration thereof, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the denial of intervention be affirmed in No. 22-5167

and the merits appeal be dismissed for lack of appellate jurisdiction in No. 22-5140, in accordance

with the opinion of the court filed herein this date.

Per Curiam

FOR THE COURT:

Mark J. Langer, Clerk

BY: /s/

Daniel J. Reidy

Deputy Clerk

Date: May 19, 2023

Opinion for the court filed by Senior Circuit Judge Rogers.

USCA Case #22-5140 Document #1999973 Filed: 05/19/2023 Page 1 of 1