alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 156.250 Meaningful access to qualified health plan information.

A QHP issuer must provide all information that is critical for obtaining health insurance coverage or access to health care services through the QHP, including applications, forms, and notices, to qualified individuals, applicants, qualified employers, qualified employees, and enrollees in accordance with the standards described in § 155.205(c) of this subchapter. Information is deemed to be critical for obtaining health insurance coverage or access to health care services if the issuer is required by law or regulation to provide the document to a qualified individual, applicant, qualified employer, qualified employee, or enrollee.

[80 FR 10874, Feb. 27, 2015]
#### Commonwealth, Appellant, *v.*Burr.

Argued Oct. 5, 1914.

Appeal, No. 98, April T., 1915, by plaintiff, from order of Q. S. Warren Co., June Sessions, 1914, No. 5, refusing an appeal from a justice of the peace in case of Commonwealth v. John Burr.

Before Rice, P. J., Orlady, Head, Henderson, Kephart and Trexler, JJ.

Appeal quashed.

*D. U. Arird,*for appellant.

*C. E. Bordwell*and *Edward Liridsey,*for appellee.

October 12, 1914:

Per Curiam,

For the reasons given in the immediately preceding case (Com. v. Hesch) the appeal is quashed.
Exhibit






                         SEVENTH AMENDMENT TO THE
                              INTERFACE, INC. NONQUALIFIED SAVINGS PLAN II
                              (as amended and restated effective January 1, 2009)


THIS AMENDMENT to the Interface, Inc. Nonqualified Savings Plan II (the “Plan”) is made by the Administrative Committee of the Plan (the “Administrative Committee”).


W  I  T  N  E  S  S  E  T  H :


WHEREAS, Interface, Inc. (the “Company”) maintains the Plan for the benefit of its eligible key management and highly compensated employees; and


WHEREAS, Section 9.1 of the Plan provides that the Administrative Committee has the right to amend the Plan at any time; and


WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan to provide for a deadline for participants to bring claims under the Plan;


NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows, effective as of July 1,
2020:


		
	1.
	A new Section 6.2 is added to the Plan, to read as follows:




6.2    Rights.


If a Participant or beneficiary has any grievance, complaint or claim concerning any aspect of the operation or administration of the Plan or Trust, including but not limited to claims for benefits and complaints concerning the investments of Plan assets (collectively referred to herein as “claim” or “claims”), such claim must be submitted within the “applicable limitations period.” The “applicable limitations period” will be (A) in the case of an error that can reasonably be discovered from a trade confirmation, account statement, or any other documents that are made available to the Participant or beneficiary on the recordkeeping website, 1 year from the notification (via email or otherwise) to the Participant or beneficiary of such trade confirmation, account statement or other documents; or (B) in the case of any other claim, 2 years, beginning on (i) in the case of any payment, the date on which the payment was made, or (ii) for all other claims, the date on which the action complained of occurred. Additionally, upon denial of an appeal pursuant to Section 6.1, a Participant or beneficiary will have 90 days within which to bring suit against the Plan for any claim related to such denied appeal; any such suit initiated after such 90-day period will be precluded.


		
	2.
	Except as specified herein, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.














IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Administrative Committee has caused its duly authorized member to execute this Amendment on the date written below.




ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE


 /s/ J. Gregory Minano
___________________________________________
By: J. Gregory Minano
Its: Committee Chair
§ 1608.4 Prohibitions applicable to all employees. ( a ) No employee shall intentionally identify the Corporation or a recipient with any partisian or nonpartisan political activity, or with the campaign of any candidate for public or party office.
( b ) No employee shall use any Corporation funds for activities prohibited to attorneys under § 1608.6; nor shall an employee intentionally identify or encourage others to identify the Corporation or a recipient with such activities.
§ 153.260 General oversight requirements for State-operated reinsurance programs. ( a ) *Accounting requirements.* A State that establishes a reinsurance program must ensure that its applicable reinsurance entity keeps an accounting for each benefit year of: ( 1 ) All reinsurance contributions received from HHS for reinsurance payments and for administrative expenses;
( 2 ) All claims for reinsurance payments received from issuers of reinsurance-eligible plans;
( 3 ) All reinsurance payments made to issuers of reinsurance-eligible plans; and
( 4 ) All administrative expenses incurred for the reinsurance program.
( b ) *State summary report.* A State that establishes a reinsurance program must submit to HHS and make public a report on its reinsurance program operations for each benefit year in the manner and timeframe specified by HHS. The report must summarize the accounting for the benefit year kept pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section.
( c ) *Independent external audit.* A State that establishes a reinsurance program must engage an independent qualified auditing entity to perform a financial and programmatic audit for each benefit year of its State-operated reinsurance program in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards (GAAS). The State must: ( 1 ) Provide to HHS the results of the audit, in the manner and timeframe to be specified by HHS;
( 2 ) Ensure that the audit addresses the prohibitions set forth in § 153.265;
( 3 ) Identify to HHS any material weakness or significant deficiency identified in the audit, and address in writing to HHS how the State intends to correct any such material weakness or significant deficiency; and
( 4 ) Make public a summary of the results of the audit, including any material weakness or significant deficiency and how the State intends to correct the material weakness or significant deficiency, in the manner and timeframe to be specified by HHS.
[78 FR 65093, Oct. 30, 2013]
§ 1610.5 Grants, subgrants, donations, and gifts made by recipients. ( a ) Subgrants in which a recipient provides LSC funds or LSC-funded resources as some or all of a subgrant to a subrecipient are governed by 45 CFR part 1627. That rule states how the restrictions apply to the subgrant and to the non-LSC funds of the subrecipient, which can vary with different types of subgrants.
( b ) Donations and gifts using LSC funds are prohibited by 45 CFR part 1630.
( c ) Use of non-LSC funds. Grants, subgrants, donations, or gifts provided by a recipient and funded entirely with non-LSC funds are not subject to this part.
#### § 156.953 ALJ decision.

The ALJ will issue an initial agency decision based only on the record and on applicable law; the decision will contain findings of fact and conclusions of law. The ALJ's decision is final and appealable after 30 days unless it is modified or vacated under § 156.957.
S. Con. Res. 36 Agreed to May 21, 2024

One Hundred Eighteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty four 

Concurrent Resolution 

Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 

SECTION 1. USE OF EMANCIPATION HALL FOR EVENT TO CELEBRATE 

BIRTHDAY OF KING KAMEHAMEHA I. 

(a) AUTHORIZATION.—Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor 

Center is authorized to be used on June 16, 2024, for an event 

to celebrate the birthday of King Kamehameha I. 

(b) PREPARATIONS.—Physical preparations for the conduct of 

the event described in subsection (a) shall be carried out in accordance with such conditions as may be prescribed by the Architect 

of the Capitol. 

Attest: 

Secretary of the Senate. 

Attest: 

Clerk of the House of Representatives.
```

[House Report 106-901]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

106th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 2d Session                                                     106-901

======================================================================

 
 WAIVING ALL POINTS OF ORDER AGAINST A MOTION TO CONCUR IN THE SENATE 
         AMENDMENT TO H.R. 4365, CHILDREN'S HEALTH ACT OF 2000

                                _______
                                

 September 26, 2000.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

                                _______
                                

Ms. Pryce of Ohio, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 594]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 594, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

                summary of provisions of the resolution

    The resolution waives all points of order against a motion 
to concur in the Senate amendment to H.R. 4365, Children's 
Health Act of 2000. The rule further provides one hour of 
debate on the motion equally divided and controlled by the 
chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on 
Commerce.

                                  

```
Rockingham,

No. 5380.

#### Utica Mutual Insurance Company *v.*Frederick J. Plante *& a.*

Argued September 9, 1965.

Decided December 7, 1965.

*Devine, Millimet, McDonough, Stahl & Branch*and *K Donald Dufresne {Mr. Dufresne*orally), for the plaintiff.

*Shute & Engel*and *Francis f. Frasier {Mr. Frasier*orally), for the defendants.

*526Lampron, J.

The law is well settled in New Hampshire that there can be no recovery of counsel fees from the adverse party to a cause in the absence of statutory authorization, agreement between the parties, or some established exception. *Jacques*v. Company, 78 N. H. 248, 250. This is in accord with the law of most jurisdictions. *Shapiro*v. *Magaziner,*418 Pa. 278; *Child*v. *Lincoln Enterprises, Inc.,*51 I11. App. 2d 76; 20 Am. Jur. 2d, Costs, *s.*73, *pp.*59, 60.

RSA 525:13 provides that a nominal attorney fee shall be allowed in bills of costs for an appearance by a defendant. “There is no statute which in terms or by implication authorizes the Court to allow more than that sum.” *Jacques*v. *Company,*supra;*Murray*v. Peabody, 106 N. H. 319, 329. There is no allegation in this case of an agreement between the parties to pay counsel fees nor does this case fall within the well-established exceptions where the authority to allow such fees has been recognized. *Guay*v. Association, 87 N. H. 216; *Peterson*v. *Reilly,*105 N. H. 340, 353.

If by reason of the fact that actions for declaratory judgments (RSA 491:22) are called petitions and are commonly placed upon the equity docket they may be said to possess certain attributes of equity proceedings *(American Employers Ins. Co.*v. *Liberi,*101 N. H. 480, 482), this fact would not in itself give the Court power to allow counsel fees. *Drummond*v. *Drummond,*414 Pa. 548.

The cases relied on by the defendants in which the Trial Court refused to permit the dismissal of plaintiff’s action involved cross actions by the defendant for recoupment, separate maintenance and an injunction. *Johnson*v. *Association,*68 N. H. 437; *Moylan*v. *Lamothe,*92 N. H. 299; *Dorney*v. *Dorney,*98 N. H. 159; *Sawtelle*v. *Tatone,*105 N. H. 398. They do not govern this case where as part of their answer seeking the dismissal of plaintiff’s action, the defendants sought their costs, which the Court allowed, and counsel fees, which were not. On the record transferred to this court the Trial Court properly granted plaintiff’s request to dismiss its petition for declaratory judgment after settlement of the law actions which brought it about.

*Exceptions overruled.*

All concurred.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           3,558
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   63,752
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     54,684
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               121,994
<PP&E>                                         533,102
<DEPRECIATION>                                 162,407
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,089,944
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,330,688
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       234,466
<OTHER-SE>                                     279,825
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,089,944
<SALES>                                        166,784
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               166,784
<CGS>                                          280,872
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,665,684
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 140
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,779,912)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,779,912)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,779,912)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
CERTIFICATIONS
      OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
      SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT





Exhibit
      32




**CERTIFICATIONS
      PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**


**(18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Knight Energy Corp., a Maryland
      corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008, as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), William J.
      Bosso, Principal Executive Officer and Bruce A. Hall, Principal Financial
      Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to § 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to their knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/
                William J. BossoWilliam
                J. Bosso, Principal Executive OfficerAugust
                13, 2008




/s/
                Bruce A. HallBruce
                A. HallPrincipal
                Financial OfficerAugust
                13, 2008
UNITED STATES 


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMM ISSION 


WASHINGTON , D.C. 20S49 


OFFICE OF 

INSPECTOR GENERAL 

September 23,2013 

Inspector General Lynne McFarland 

Office of Inspector General 

Federal Election Commission 

999 E Street, NW 

Suite 940 

Washington, DC 20463 

Re: 	 Report on the Quality Assessment Review of the Investigative Operations of 

the Office of Inspector General for the Federal Election Commission 

Dear Inspector General McFarland: 

We have reviewed the system of internal safeguards and management procedures for the 

investigative operations ofthe Office oflnspector General (OIG) for the Federal Election 

Commission (FEC) in effect for the period January 1, 2012 through March 31, 2013. Our 

review was conducted in conformity with the Quality Standards for Investigations and the 

Quality Assessment Review Guidelines established by the Counsel of the Inspectors 

General on Integrity and Efficiency. 

We reviewed compliance with the FEC OIG's system ofinternal policies and procedures 

to the extent we considered appropriate. The review was conducted at the FEC OIG' s 

office in Washington, D.C. Additionally, we reviewed the case file for the one 

investigation completed during our review period, as well as two hotline complaint files 

from that period. 

In our opinion, the system of internal safeguards and management procedures for the 

investigative function of the FEC OIG in effect for the period January 1, 2012 through 

March 31 , 2013 , is in compliance with the quality standards established by the CIGIE. 

These safeguards and procedures provide reasonable assurance of conforming with 

professional standards in the planning, execution, and reporting of its investigations. 

Sincerely, 

a/W, ~ Carl W. Hoecker 

Inspector General 
List of Closed Investigative and Complaint Files Reviewed 


Case File Number Case Closing Date 

INV-11-01 December 23,2011 

HL-12-01 February 12, 2013 

HL-12-03 February 12, 2013
§ 1629.3 Who must be bonded? ( a ) A recipient must supply fidelity bond coverage for all employees, officers, directors, agents, and volunteers.
( b ) If a recipient uses a third party for payroll, billing, or collection services, the recipient must either supply coverage covering the third party or ensure that the third party has a fidelity bond or similar insurance coverage.
( c ) For recipients with subgrants: ( 1 ) The recipient must extend its fidelity bond coverage to supply identical coverage to the subrecipient and the subrecipient's directors, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers to the extent required to comply with this Part; or
( 2 ) The subrecipient must supply proof of its own fidelity bond coverage that meets the requirements of this Part for the subrecipient's directors, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers.
**Exhibit 34.2**

Reportof Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

First Data Resources. Inc. andREMITCO LLC

 

We have examined management’s assertion,included in the accompanying Report on Assessment of Compliance with SECRegulation AB Servicing Criteria, that First Data Resources, Inc. and itsaffiliate, REMITCO LLC (jointly, First Data) complied with the servicingcriteria set forth in Item 1122 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’sRegulation AB for the remittance payment platform as of and for the year endedDecember 31, 2006, except for 1122 (d)(l)(i)-(iv), 1122(d)(2)(ii)-(vii),1122(d)(3)(i)-(iv), 1122(d)(4)(i)-(iii) and (v)-(xv), which First Data hasdetermined are not applicable to the activities performed by it with respect tothe servicing platform covered by this report. Management is responsible forFirst Data’s compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is toexpress an opinion on management’s assertion about First Data’s compliance withthe servicing criteria based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance withstandards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and,accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about First Data’scompliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such otherprocedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examinationincluded testing of less than all of the individual asset backed transactionsand securities that comprise the platform, testing of less than all of theservicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether FirstData processed those selected transactions and performed those selectedactivities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Furthermore, ourprocedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activitiesperformed by First Data during the period covered by this report. Ourprocedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurredeither prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balancesor amounts calculated or reported by First Data during the period covered bythis report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believethat our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Ourexamination does not provide a legal determination on First Data’s compliancewith the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management’s assertionthat First Data complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of andfor the year ended December 31, 2006, for the remittance payment platform isfairly stated, in all material respects.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

February 26, 2007

 

----
Exhibit 32.1 

CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF 

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of GTJ REIT, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Periodic Report”), I, Paul A. Cooper, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

|   | 1. | the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| Date: April 11, 2016 |   | /s/ Paul A. Cooper                   |
|----------------------|--------|--------------------------------------|
|                 |   | Paul A. Cooper                       |
|                 |   | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
Exhibit 32.1





Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the quarterly report of MetroCorp Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, George M. Lee, Executive Vice Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and operating results of the Company.





/s/ George M. LeeGeorge M. Lee
Executive Vice Chairman, President andChief Executive Officer


August 10, 2009