alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1322.31 Title VI and Title III coordination. ( a ) A Tribal organization or Hawaiian Native grantee under Title VI of the Act must have policies and procedures, developed in coordination with the relevant State agency, area agency or agencies, and service provider(s) that explain how the Title VI program will coordinate with Title III and/or VII funded services within the Tribal organization's or Hawaiian Native grantee's approved service area for which older Native Americans and family caregivers are eligible to ensure compliance with sections 614(a)(11) and 624(a)(3) of the Act (42 U.S.C. 3057e(a)(11) and 3057j(a)(3)), respectively. A Tribal organization or Hawaiian Native grantee may meet these requirements by participating in Tribal consultation with the State agency regarding Title VI programs.
( b ) The policies and procedures set forth in paragraph (a) of this section must at a minimum address: ( 1 ) How the Tribal organization or Hawaiian Native grantee will provide outreach to Tribal elders and family caregivers regarding services for which they may be eligible under Title III and/or VII of the Act;
( 2 ) The communication opportunities the Tribal organization or Hawaiian Native grantee will make available to Title III and VII programs, to include meetings, email distribution lists, and presentations;
( 3 ) The methods for collaboration on and sharing of program information and changes;
( 4 ) How Title VI programs may refer individuals who are eligible for Title III services;
( 5 ) How services will be provided in a culturally appropriate and trauma-informed manner; and
( 6 ) Processes the Title VI program will use for providing feedback on the State plan on aging and any area plans on aging relevant to the Tribal organization's or Hawaiian Native grantee's approved service area.
( c ) The Title VI program director, as set forth in § 1322.13(a), shall participate in the development of policies and procedures as set forth in §§ 1321.53, 1321.69, and 1321.95 of this chapter.
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Michael V. Shustek, as the Chief Executive Officer of Vestin Group, Inc.,certify that:
1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB of Vestin Group, Inc. 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofVestin Group, Inc. as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. Vestin Group, Inc.’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for Vestin Group,Inc. and have:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to VestinGroup, Inc., including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and34-47986  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of Vestin Group, Inc.’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report basedon such evaluations; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any changes in Vestin Group, Inc.’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred duringVestin Group, Inc.’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect Vestin Group,Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting; and;
5. Vestin Group, Inc.’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to Vestin Group, Inc.’s auditors and the audit committee ofVestin Group, Inc.’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):
 (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal controls over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect Vestin Group, Inc.’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in Vestin Group,Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: May 17, 2004 /s/ Michael V. ShustekMichael V. ShustekChief Executive OfficerVestin Group, Inc.
32
EXHIBIT 10.36


January 6, 2001



VIA FACSIMILE  81-728-32-8178



ONKYO CORPORATION
2-1, Nisshin-Cho, Neyagawa-Shi
Osaka 572-8450, Japan

Attention: Mr. Naoto Otsuki

Dear Mr. Otsuki:

     Thank  you for the  courtesies  you  extended  to Mr.  Shimojima  and me on
December 22nd during our visit to Japan. This letter confirms our agreement that
the Share Purchase  Agreement,  as amended,  by and among Global  Technovations,
Inc. ("GTI"), Onkyo America, Inc. ("Onkyo America"), Onkyo Corporation ("Onkyo")
Onkyo Malaysia SDN.BHD. and Onkyo Europe Electronics GMBH, is further amended as
described  below. We appreciate that you recognize that the recent  softening in
the automobile  industry has affected the  anticipated  results of operations of
Onkyo  America  since GTI acquired it on August 31,  2000.  As a gesture of your
goodwill, Onkyo has agreed as follows:

     1. The Onkyo America  inter-company  obligations  (including the $1,000,000
note) referred to in Section 17.01 of the Share Purchase Agreement currently due
on May 31, 2001 have been extended to March 10, 2002;

     2. The note  issued to Onkyo (the  "Seller's  Note")  shall be  modified by
reducing the total of principal amount by $1,000,000.  In addition, the interest
which has accrued on the portion of the  Seller's  Note which is being  forgiven
shall be waived.  The interest on the balance of the Seller's  Note has been and
shall continue to accrue in accordance with the terms of the Seller's Note.

     I am enclosing  $10.00 checks from GTI and Onkyo  America  payable to Onkyo
which serves as the formal consideration for your agreement.

     I am also asking Mr. Shinobu  Shimojima to execute a copy of this agreement
as President of Onkyo America.


<PAGE>
     Please execute a copy of this letter evidencing your agreement to its terms
and facsimile it back to me at (561) 775-2668.

Sincerely yours,



William C. Willis, Jr., President
and Chief Executive Officer
Enclosures

WE HEREBY AGREE TO THE FOREGOING:

Onkyo Corporation


By: _______________________
      Naoto Otsuki, Chairman and
      Chief Executive Officer


Onkyo America, Inc.


By:  ________________________
       Shinobu Shimojima, President
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20463

 November 28, 2022 

Via Electronic Mail Only 

Leslie Lew 

430 SW 13th Ave 

Apt 1909 

Portland, OR 97205 

 RE: MUR 8092 

 Leslie Lew

Dear Mr. Lew: 

On October 22, 2020, you were notified as a respondent in the above-captioned matter. 

Upon further review of the Submission, the Commission, on November 15, 2022, voted to take 

no action and close the file as to Leslie Lew. 

 You are advised that the confidentiality provisions of 52 U.S.C. § 30109(a)(12)(A) 

remain in effect, and that this matter is still open with respect to other respondents. The 

Commission will notify you when the entire file has been closed. 

 If you have any questions, please contact Kimberly Hart, the attorney assigned to this 

matter, at (202) 694-1618. 

 Sincerely,

 

 Mark Shonkwiler 

 Assistant General Counsel

 

MUR809200044
Opinion issued August 30 , 2018

In The 

## Court of Appeals

For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01

- 18

- 00 634

- CV

——————————— IN RE STEVE HEBERT , Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, Steve Hebe rt , has filed a petition for writ of mandamus, seeking to

set aside the trial court’s order denying his “M otion to E xpunge L is P endens. ” 1

We deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. See T EX

. R. A PP . P.
52.8(a).

1 The underlying case is Charles D. Snider, Jr., Trustee of the SF Revocable Living Trust I v. Steve Hebert
, cause number 2017

- 44445 , pending in the 1 90 t h District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honor able Debra Ibarra Mayfield presiding

.2 PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chi ef Justice Radack and Justices Brown and Caughey

.
118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 25 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), That, in the enrollment of H.R. 2872, the 

3 Clerk of the House of Representatives shall amend the 

4 title so as to read: ‘‘Making further continuing appropria5 tions for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2024, and 

6 for other purposes.’’. 

Passed the Senate January 18, 2024. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 
118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 25 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Providing for a correction in the enrollment of H.R. 

2872.
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 45648

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

GRANT ABEL ULUKOA DACALIO,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Filed: July 12, 2018

Karel A. Lehrman, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fifth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Twin 

Falls County. Hon. Randy J. Stoker, District Judge. 

Order relinquishing jurisdiction, affirmed.

Eric D. Fredericksen, State Appellate Public Defender; Lara E. Anderson, Deputy 

Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney 

General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before GRATTON, Chief Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge;

and HUSKEY, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM

Grant Abel Ulukoa Dacalio pled guilty to eluding a peace officer, Idaho Code § 49-

1404(2)(a) and/or (c). The district court imposed a unified sentence of five years, with a 

minimum period of confinement of three years, and retained jurisdiction. Dacalio filed an Idaho 

Criminal Rule 35 motion, which the district court denied. The district court retained jurisdiction, 

and Dacalio was sent to participate in the rider program.

Prior to Dacalio completing his rider, the district court relinquished jurisdiction upon 

recommendation of the Idaho Department of Correction. Dacalio appeals, claiming that the 

district court erred by relinquishing jurisdiction. 
2

We note that the decision to place a defendant on probation or whether, instead, to 

relinquish jurisdiction over the defendant is a matter within the sound discretion of the district 

court and will not be overturned on appeal absent an abuse of that discretion. State v. Hood, 102 

Idaho 711, 712, 639 P.2d 9, 10 (1981); State v. Lee, 117 Idaho 203, 205-06, 786 P.2d 594, 596-

97 (Ct. App. 1990). The record in this case shows that the district court properly considered the 

information before it and determined that probation was not appropriate. We hold that Dacalio

has failed to show that the district court abused its discretion in relinquishing jurisdiction. The 

order of the district court relinquishing jurisdiction is affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS INCLUDED
IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-29-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-25-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-24-1999
<CASH>                                          44,459
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  314,653
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (11,086)
<INVENTORY>                                    197,978
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               673,880
<PP&E>                                         373,046
<DEPRECIATION>                               (151,817)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,976,930
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          328,500
<BONDS>                                      1,169,396
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            37
<OTHER-SE>                                     452,254
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,976,930
<SALES>                                        625,503
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               625,503
<CGS>                                          450,720
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  166,009<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                14,936<F2>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   500
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              27,717
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (34,379)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,852
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (27,527)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (27,527)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.75)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.75)
<FN>
<F1>Includes $1,909 of operating restructuring costs.
<F2>Includes $13,555 of foreign currency transaction loss.
</FN>


</TABLE>
**Exhibit
        32.1**
  **Certification
        of Principal Executive Officer**
 **Pursuant
        to**
 **Section
        906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)**
  In
        connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30,
        2008
        (the “Report”) of Tailwind Financial Inc. (the “Registrant”), as filed with the
        Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Andrew A. McKay,
        Chief
        Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my
        knowledge, that:
  (1)
        The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
  (2)
        The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the
        Registrant.
  Date:
                    September 15, 2008
                /s/
                    Andrew A. McKayName:
                    Andrew A. McKayTitle:
                    Chief Executive Officer(principal
                    executive officer)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

CAMPAIGN LEGAL CENTER, et al.,

 Plaintiffs,

 v.

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION,

 Defendant,

 and

HILLARY FOR AMERICA, et al.,

 Defendant-Intervenors.

 Civil Action No. 19-2336 (JEB)

DEFENDANT-INTERVENORS’ SECOND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Defendant-Intervenors Hillary for America and Correct the Record respectfully move this 

Court for an order granting their Second Motion for Summary Judgment under Rule 56 of the 

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 7(h). Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 

10(c), Defendant-Intervenors’ Second Motion for Summary Judgment expressly incorporates by 

reference their prior briefing on the merits of this case in their previous Motion for Summary 

Judgment, see ECF Nos. 38-1 at 26-53 & 44 at 11-12.

In support of this Second Motion, Intervenors file (1) a Memorandum of Points and 

Authorities in Support of their Second Motion for Summary Judgment and (2) a Proposed Order. 

Case 1:19-cv-02336-JEB Document 61 Filed 08/12/22 Page 1 of 2
- 2 -

DATED: August 12, 2022 Respectfully submitted,

ELIAS LAW GROUP LLP

 By: /s/ Aria C. Branch

Marc E. Elias, Bar No. 442007

Aria C. Branch, Bar No. 1014541

MElias@elias.law

ABranch@elias.law

10 G Street NE, Suite 600

Washington, D.C. 20002

Telephone: 202.968.4490

Facsimile: 202.968.4498

 Attorneys for Defendant-Intervenors

Case 1:19-cv-02336-JEB Document 61 Filed 08/12/22 Page 2 of 2
- 4412
- 4413
- 4414
# Congressional Candidate Table 1

&"-,Bold"&KFF0000This table was generated on 5/8/20.
#### § 72.30 General requirements.

Applicants must have an approved Recovery Action Program on file with the appropriate NPS Regional Office prior to applying for Rehabilitation or Innovation grants. Rehabilitation and Innovation proposals must be based on priorities identified in the applicant jurisdiction's Recovery Action Program. Once NPS has indicated that a Rehabilitation or Innovation proposal is fundable, the applicant must meet all documentation requirements imposed by OMB Circulars A-102, A-95 and FMC 74-4. Regional offices of NPS will provide technical assistance to grantees in complying with these requirements.
§ 1160.13 Indemnification limits. The dollar amounts of the limits described below are found in the guidelines referred to in § 1160.1 and are based upon the statutory limits in the Arts and Artifacts Indemnity Act (20 U.S.C. 974). ( a ) There is a maximum amount of loss or damage covered in a single exhibition or an Indemnity Agreement.
( b ) A sliding scale deductible amount is applicable to loss or damage arising out of a single exhibition for which an indemnity is issued.
( c ) There is an aggregate amount of loss or damage covered by indemnity agreements at any one time.
( d ) The maximum value of eligible items carried in or upon any single instrumentality of transportation at any one time, is established by the Council.
[56 FR 49848, Oct. 2, 1991. Redesignated at 60 FR 42465, Aug. 16, 1995, and further redesignated at 73 FR 21056, Apr. 18, 2008]
RESOLUTIONS

CALENDAR 

NO.

S. RES. 

NO.

SUBJECT 

REPORTED 

BY

1

 
TREATIES

CALENDAR 

NO.

TREATY

DOC. NO.

SUBJECT 

REPORTED 

BY

2

 
* Signifies nominee’s commitment to respond to requests to appear and testify before any duly constituted committee of the Senate 

NOMINATIONS

CALENDAR 

NO.

MESSAGE

NO.

NOMINEE, OFFICE, AND PREDECESSOR REPORTED 

BY

3

 [NEW REPORTS] 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY 

* 23 226 Michael Jackson, of Virginia, to be Deputy 

Secretary of Homeland Security, vice James M. 

Loy, resigned. 

Mar 09, 2005 Reported by Ms. 

Collins, Committee on 

Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs, without 

printed report. 

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 

24 86 Raymond Thomas Wagner, Jr., of Missouri, to be 

a Member of the Internal Revenue Service 

Oversight Board for a term expiring September 

14, 2009. (Reappointment) 

Mar 09, 2005 Reported by Mr. 

Grassley, Committee on 

Finance, without printed 

report. 

FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE BOARD 

* 25 77 Ronald Rosenfeld, of Oklahoma, to be a Director 

of the Federal Housing Finance Board for the 

remainder of the term expiring February 27, 

2009, vice John Thomas Korsmo, resigned. 

Mar 09, 2005 Reported by Mr. 

Shelby, Committee on Banking, 

Housing, and Urban Affairs, 

without printed report. 

CORPORATION FOR NATIONAL AND 

COMMUNITY SERVICE 

26 111 Edward L. Flippen, of Virginia, to be Inspector 

General, Corporation for National and 

Community Services, vice J. Russell George. 

Mar 09, 2005 Senate Committee 

on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

discharged. Pursuant to 

unanimous consent agreement 

of January 20, 2005. 

 Feb 10, 2005 Reported by Mr. 

Enzi, Committee on Health, 

Education, Labor, and 

Pensions, without printed 

report.
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Michael V. Shustek, as the Chief Executive Officer of Vestin Group, Inc.,certify that:
1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB of Vestin Group, Inc. 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofVestin Group, Inc. as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. Vestin Group, Inc.’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for Vestin Group,Inc. and have:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to VestinGroup, Inc., including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and34-47986;  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of Vestin Group, Inc.’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report basedon such evaluations; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any changes in Vestin Group, Inc.’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred duringVestin Group, Inc.’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, VestinGroup, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. Vestin Group, Inc.’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to Vestin Group, Inc.’s auditors and the audit committee ofVestin Group, Inc.’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):
 (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect Vestin Group, Inc.’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in Vestin Group,Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: August 16, 2004
/s/ Michael V. ShustekMichael V. Shustek