alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1330.3 Definitions. As used in this part: ( a ) *Secretary* means the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services.
( b ) *Administrator* means the Administrator of the Administration for Community Living.
( c ) *Director* means the Director of the National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research.
( d ) *Research* is classified on a continuum from basic to applied: ( 1 ) *Basic research* is research in which the investigator is concerned primarily with gaining new knowledge or understanding of a subject without reference to any immediate application or utility.
( 2 ) *Applied research* is research in which the investigator is primarily interested in developing new knowledge, information, or understanding which can be applied to a predetermined rehabilitation problem or need.
( e ) *Development activities* use knowledge and understanding gained from research to create materials, devices, systems, or methods beneficial to the target population, including design and development of prototypes and processes.
( f ) *Products* encompass models, methods, tools, applications, and devices, but are not necessarily limited to these types.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 121 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. J. RES. 121

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
abolish the electoral college and to provide for the direct election of 
         the President and Vice President of the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 12, 2024

  Mr. Schatz (for himself, Mr. Durbin, and Mr. Welch) introduced the 
 following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
abolish the electoral college and to provide for the direct election of 
         the President and Vice President of the United States.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States:

                              ``Article --

    ``Section 1. The President and Vice President shall be elected by 
the people of the several States and the district constituting the seat 
of government of the United States.
    ``Section 2. Each voter shall cast a single vote for two persons 
who have consented to the joining of their names as candidates for 
President and Vice President.
    ``Section 3. The pair of candidates having the greatest number of 
votes for President and Vice President shall be elected.
    ``Section 4. The Congress may by law provide for the case of the 
death or any other disqualification of any candidate for President or 
Vice President before the day on which the President-elect or Vice 
President-elect has been chosen, and for the case of a tie in any 
election.
    ``Section 5. This article shall take effect one year after the 
first day of January following ratification.''.
                                 <all>
```
SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

ONE HUNDRED FIFTH CONGRESS 

{ 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Wednesday, January 29, 1997 

t TJH: DIRfX'TION OF GARY SISCO, 

Sf:CHt:TARY Oi'' '!'HI<: SENATE 
UNANrnMOUSCONSENTAGREEMENT 

Ordered, That at 9:30a.m. on Wednesday, January 29th, the Senate proceed to Executive Session to consider the 

nomination of Andrew M. Cuomo, of New York, to be Secretary of Housing and Urban Development; further, there be 

30 minutes for debate equally divided between the Senator from New York (Mr. D'Amato) and the Senator from 

Maryland (Mr. Sarbanes), with a vote to occur at the expirction or yielding back of time; further, immediately 

following the vote the President be notified of the Senate's action and the Senate then return to legislative session. 

January 28, 1997 
CAl.ENDAR 

No. 

Ex.REs 

No. 

1 

RESOLUTIONS 

SUBJECT 

REPORTED 

BY 

__________ _L _____________ __j _________ _ 
CALENDAR 

No. 

TREATY 

Doc. No. 

2 

TREATIES 

SUBJECT 

REPORTED 

BY 
CAI..ENDAR 

No. 

s 

4 

MESSAGE 

No 

80 

4 

3 

NOMINATIONS 

NOMINEE, OFFICE, AND PREDECESSOR 

[NEW REPORTS] 

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN 

DEVELOPMENT 

Andrew M. Cuomo, of New York, to be Secretary 

of Housing and Urban Development, vice 

Henry G. Cisneros, resigned. 

CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES 

Alan M. Hantman, of New Jersey, to be Architect 

of the Capitol for the term of ten years, vice 

George Malcolm White. 

REPORTED 

BY 

Jan 28,97 Reported by Mr. 

D'Amato, Committee on 

Banking, Housing, and Urban 

Affairs, without printed report. 

Jan 28,97 Reported by Mr. 

Warner, Committee on Rules 

and Administration, without 

printed report. 

Signifies nominee's commztment to respond to requests to appear and testify before any duly consti-tuted committee of the Senate 
4 

NOMINATIONS PLACED ON THE SECRETARY'S DESK
#### Farmers & Merchants National Bank of Fremont, appellee, v. S. D. Worden, appellant.

Filed January 7, 1914.

No. 17,424.

Banks and Banking: General Deposit: Pleading: Demand. In an action by a bank on a promissory note, an answer pleading a ' set-off for general deposits does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action in fav.or of defendant, without alleging that, at the time the suit was commenced, a demand for the deposits had been made, or waived, or shown to be unnecessary. *Citizens State Bank v. Worden, ante,*p. 53.

Appeal from the district court for Boone county: George H. Thomas, Judge.

*Affirmed.*

*H. 0. Vail, F. A. Doten*and *F. D. Williams,*for appellant.

*E. F. Gray, A. E. Garten*and i¥. *B. Foster, contra.*

Rose, J.

This is a suit on promissory note for $1,184.61, dated March 3, 1910, payable 60 days after date, and bearing interest at the rate of 8 per cent, per annum. S. D. Wor*59den, maker, and J. J. Carey, payee, are defendants. Before maturity the note was assigned to the Farmers & Merchants National Bank of Fremont, plaintiff. Interest was paid to September 24, 1910, and, in addition, there was a payment of $90.48 on the principal. Carey made default. An amended answer by Worden contained a general denial and a set-off for bank deposits. The reply was a general denial. The parties waived a jury, and the case was tried to the court. The execution and delivery of the note in suit and the assignment to plaintiff were proved without contradiction. A demurrer by plaintiff to evidence in support of the cross-demand of Worden was interposed, on the ground that the allegations relating to the set-off do not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The trial court sustained the demurrer. Worden refused to plead further, and judgment was rendered against both of the defendants for $1,170.63. Worden appeals.

The decision is controlled by the principles announced in *Citizens State Bank v. Worden,*ante, p. 53, and, for the reasons stated in the opinion therein, the judgment below is

Affirmed.

Letton, Fawcett and Hamer, JJ., not sitting.
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

November 20, 2018

No. 04

- 18

- 00344

- CV

John B. URBAHNS

, Appell ant

v.

LSREF2 COBALT (TX) , LLC, Appellee

From the 288th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texa s Trial Court No. 2017CI22479 Honorable Richard Price, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Appell ee ’ s brief wa s due on November 16 , 2018

. Before the brief’s twice

- extended due date, the parties filed a joint motion to abat e this appeal until November 30, 2018, to give them time to participate in settle ment discussions

. The parties’ joint motion to abate this appeal is GRANTED. We ABATE this appeal until November 30, 2018.
We ORDER Appellant to file in this court no t later than November 30 , 201 8

, (1) a motion to dismiss the appeal or (2) a motion to reinst ate the appeal on the court’s docket so the appeal may proceed.
If the parties fail to settle, Appell ee ’ s brief will be due on December 10, 2018

. All other appellate deadlines are SUSPENDED pending further order of this court

.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 20th day of November, 2018

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
#### § 1181.102 Application.

This part applies to all programs or activities conducted by the agency.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.2



January 11, 2001


The Board of Directors
Portal Net Limited
Unit 1806, Hutchison House
10 Harcourt Road
Central
Hong Kong


Dear Sirs,

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference in this Form 20-F of our report dated January 2, 2001 included in this
Registration Statement. It should be noted that we have not audited any
financial statements of the Company subsequent to September 30, 2000 or
performed any audit procedures subsequent to the date of our report.


Very truly yours,


/s/ Arthur Andersen & Co.
-------------------------
#### §§ 1153.131-1153.139 [Reserved]
From: Leilani Beaver

To: Joanna Waldstreicher

Cc: Amy Rothstein

Subject: Re: Advisory Opinion 2024-02 (Waters)

Date: Wednesday, February 7, 2024 4:47:15 PM

This is correct.

Thank you,

Leilani Beaver

On Feb 7, 2024, at 1:20 PM, Joanna Waldstreicher <JWaldstreicher@fec.gov>

wrote:

Dear Ms. Beaver:

Thank you for speaking with me this afternoon. This is to confirm my understanding

that Congresswoman Waters and Citizens for Waters do not intend to ask the nonfederal committees to attest that they have reported funds used for reimbursement to

the Commission.

Please reply to this email to confirm the accuracy of this information, or to clarify or

correct it as necessary. Please note that your response may become part of the

advisory opinion request, and if so, it will be posted on the Commission’s website.

Thank you,

Joanna S. Waldstreicher

Federal Election Commission

Office of General Counsel – Policy Division

1050 First Street NE

Washington, DC 20463

202-694-1650
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 913 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 913

To make Ecuador eligible for designation as a beneficiary country under 
               the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 22, 2023

Mr. Risch (for himself and Mr. Menendez) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To make Ecuador eligible for designation as a beneficiary country under 
               the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Innovation and Development in 
Ecuador Act of 2023''.

SEC. 2. ELIGIBILITY OF ECUADOR FOR DESIGNATION AS A BENEFICIARY COUNTRY 
              UNDER CARIBBEAN BASIN ECONOMIC RECOVERY ACT.

    Section 212(b) of the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery Act (19 
U.S.C. 2702(b)) is amended by inserting after ``Dominica'' the 
following new item:
    ``Ecuador''.
                                 <all>
```
December 24,2014 

Mary Moss. Auditor 

Federal Election Commission ' 

999 E Street, NW 

Washington, DC 20463 

via email to: mmoss@fec.gov 

Re: Request far Legal Consideration by the Commission 

Dear Mrs. Moss, 

This letter is in connection with the pending Federal Election Commission Audit of the Colorado Republican 

Committee (FEC Committee ID C00033134] and is in response to the assertion that the Committee was 

obligated to report, as a debt or obligation, certain amounts owed or allegedly owed to its legal counsel, the 

law Urm of Hale Westfall, LLC, as reflected in copies of invoices, billing records and other correspondence and 

Hnancial information obtained by the FEC in connection with the Audit 

The Colorado Republican Committee does not object to the reporting under FECA or 11CFR §104.3(d] of an 

expenditure for legal services provided by legal counsel once the expenditure has actually been made by the 

Committee. However, the Committee asserts that any and all legal advice, communications and 

correspondence, including but not limited to correspondence that may include billing records and invoices 

received but not yet paid, constitute confldentiai and priviieged communications that are subject to the 

attorney-client privilege, the work-product doctrine, and the rules of confidentiality established in part by 

Rule 1.6 of the Colorado Rules of Professional Conduct and the Colorado Rules of Civil Procedure under the 

jurisdiction of the Colorado Supreme Court and under state and federal common law. 

The Colorado Republican Committee asserts that the Federal Election Commission does not have the 

authority under FECA or 11 CFR §104.3(d] to compei the Committee, or its officers or authorized agents, to 

waive the attorney-client privilege and disclose information related to legal representation and the provision 

of legal services, including debts or obligations that may or may not be owed to its legal counsel, in federal 

campaign finance disciosure reports until funds have actually been expended and an expenditure by the 

Committee has actually been made. Accordingly, the Committee seeks ciarification and a iegal determination 

from the Commission whether FECA or 11 CFR §104.3(d] requires the waiver of the attorney-client privilege 

and the public disclosure of such information in its public campaign finance disclosure reports. 

Thank you for your consideration. 

Sincerely, 

Rya yatrRTCall 

State Chairman 

5950 S. WILLOW DRIVE, SUITE 210 I GREENWOOD VILLAGE, COLORADO 801 li 

303.758.3333 PHONE I 303.362.6020 FAX I WWW.COLOGOP.ORG
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 99

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the quarterly report of Park-Ohio Industries, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of
the undersigned officers of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
sec.1350, as adopted pursuant to sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to such officer's knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the
         Report.

Dated: May 12, 2003

                                            By    /s/ EDWARD F. CRAWFORD
                                             -----------------------------------
                                            Name: Edward F. Crawford
                                            Title:  Chairman, Chief Executive
                                                    Officer and President

                                            By    /s/ RICHARD P. ELLIOTT
                                             -----------------------------------
                                            Name: Richard P. Elliott
                                            Title:  Vice President and Chief
                                                    Financial Officer

     The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
sec. 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate
disclosure document.

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Park-Ohio Industries, Inc. and will be retained by Park-Ohio
Industries, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

                                        23
3850 Three Mile Lane • McMinnville, OR 97128-9496 • USA

Phone 503 472-0011 • Fax 503 434-4231 www.evergreenaviation.com 

### EVERGREEN INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES, INC.

U.S. Department of Transportation November 16, 2012 Docket Management System West Building, Ground Floor, Rm W12-140 1200 New Jersey Ave Washington, DC 20590

Re: Exemption Request 14CFR 121.652(a)(c),

Ladies/Gentlemen:

In accordance with the Code of Federal Regulations, 14 CFR § 11.63, Evergreen International Airlines (EIA) petitions for an Exemption from 14 CFR 121.652 (a) and (c).

At the time of initial issuance, EIA was an ATA member and received exemption extensions via ATA petitions. At this time, as a “similarly situated part 12 1 certificate holder,” Evergreen International Airlines respectfully pet itions for an Exempti on from 121.652(a) and (c) on our own behalf. Our current ex emption expires on January 31, 2013.

Exemption No. 5549 provides relief from Ti tle 14, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) § 121.652 (a) and (c). When granted, this will allow a new EIA pilot in command (PIC), who is subject to higher landing weather minimum requirements to operate to the normal, lower than category I and category II minimums under the stipulated conditions.

The conditions and circumstances, in regard to public interest and equivalent levels of safety, which warranted the original grant of ex emption, continue to exist. This exemption has been in use since December, 1991 with no known compromise of safety.

The renewal of this exempti on is not a controversial issue. EIA, in accordance with the provisions of 14 CF R § 11.87(a-d), Exceptions to Public ation of Summary of Petition for Exemption, requests that a finding of good cause be made for waiving publication in the Federal Register . No precedents will be set by granting t he requested relief and this request is identical to previously appr oved requests. EIA therefore r equests that publication and the associated comment period be waived.

A summary of this petition as required by 14 CFR § 11.81, the original exemption (docket number 26732) and exemption 5549J (docket number FAA-2000-8434) are attached. If any further information or discussion is required, please contact me.

Very truly yours,

Captain William J. Zehner Director of Operations Evergreen International Airlines

3850 Three Mile Lane McMinnville, OR 97128-9496 (503) 472-0011 Ext 4435 bill.zehner@evergreenairlines.com
§ 13.3 Proceedings covered. ( a ) These rules apply only to adversary adjudications. For the purpose of these rules, only an adjudication required to be under 5 U.S.C. 554, in which the position of the Department or one of its components is represented by an attorney or other representative (“the agency's litigating party”) who enters an appearance and participates in the proceeding, constitutes an adversary adjudication. These rules do not apply to proceedings for the purpose of establishing or fixing a rate or for the purpose of granting, denying, or renewing a license.
( b ) If the agency's litigating party enters an appearance, Department proceedings listed in appendix A to this part are covered by these rules. Also covered are any other proceedings under statutes that incorporate by reference the procedures of sections 1128(f), 1128A(c)(2), or 1842(j)(2) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 1320a-7(f), 1320a-7a(c)(2), or 1395u(j)(2). If a proceeding is not covered under either of the two previous sentences, a party may file a fee application as otherwise required by this part and may argue that the Act covers the proceeding. Any coverage issue shall be determined by the adjudicative officer and, if necessary, by the appellate authority on review.
( c ) If a proceeding is covered by these rules, but also involves issues excluded under paragraph (a) of this section from the coverage of these rules, reimbursement is available only for fees and expenses resulting from covered issues.
[45 FR 45252, Oct. 4, 1983, as amended at 69 FR 2845, Jan. 21, 2004]
#### Woodhull v. Mower, appellant.

Appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff, and from an order denying a new trial. The action was brought by Brewster Woodhull against Samuel B. Mower, for money alleged to be loaned by plaintiff to defendant.

*C. J. G. Hall,*for appellant.

*B. Woodhull,*respondent in person.

Barnard, P. J.

The case presented for review a pure question of fact and the judgment was affirmed on the ground that the verdict upon conflicting evidence would not be disturbed.

*Judgment affirmed.*
#### § 158.606 Amount of penalty—general.

A civil monetary penalty for each violation of § 158.602 of this subpart may not exceed $100 as adjusted annually under 45 CFR part 102 for each day, for each responsible entity, for each individual affected by the violation. Penalties imposed under this part are in addition to any other penalties prescribed or allowed by law.

[75 FR 74921, Dec. 1, 2010, as amended at 81 FR 61581, Sept. 6, 2016]
#### § 148.306 Basis and scope.

This subpart implements section 2745 of the Public Health Service Act (PHS Act). It extends grants to States that have qualified high risk pools that meet the specific requirements described in § 148.310. It also provides specific instructions on how to apply for the grants and outlines the grant review and grant award processes.

[73 FR 22285, Apr. 25, 2008]