alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

PART I: Reporting Basics

• Filing schedule and report deadlines

• 2023 Year-End Report

• Looking ahead to 2024 filing schedule

• Pre-election reports

• 48-Hour Notices

• Filing on time

• Electronic filing

• Using best efforts for timely filing

• Best practices for filing reports

PART II: Reports Analysis Division (RAD) 

Review Process and Requests for Additional 

Information (RFAIs)

• RAD review of reports

• Categories of review

• Responding to RFAIs

• Referrals to the Audit Division, General 

Counsel and Alternative Dispute 

Resolution Offices

• Internal and fraud controls

PART III: FEC Forms and Schedules

• Candidate registration (FEC Form 2)

• Committee registration (FEC Form 1)

• Report of Receipts and Disbursements 

(FEC Form 3)

• Summary / Detailed Summary pages and 

common itemization schedules

• Reporting receipts

• Making best efforts to obtain 

contributor information

• Reporting disbursements

• Purpose of disbursement

• How to amend reports

PART IV: Reporting Scenarios

• SCENARIO 1: Earmarked Contributions

• SCENARIO 2: Curing Excessive Contributions

• Redesignation

• Reattribution

• SCENARIO 3: Joint Fundraising

• SCENARIO 4: Candidate Loans and 

48-Hour Notices

• Personal funds loan

• Bank loan

• Loan repayment

• Candidate loan 

forgiveness

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 2023 WEBINAR SERIES 

Federal Election Commission

2023 Year-End Reporting for Campaign Committees Webinar

January 24, 2024 (12:00 - 2:00 p.m. Eastern Time)
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of AppealsCAAP-12-000067626-NOV-201211:08 AM
120 STAT. 506 PUBLIC LAW 109–237—JUNE 23, 2006

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 1445:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 152 (2006):

Mar. 3, considered and passed Senate.

June 12, considered and passed House.

Æ

Public Law 109–237

109th Congress

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 520 Colorado

Avenue in Arriba, Colorado, as the ‘‘William H. Emery Post Office’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WILLIAM H. EMERY POST OFFICE.

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal

Service located at 520 Colorado Avenue in Arriba, Colorado, shall

be known and designated as the ‘‘William H. Emery Post Office’’.

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation,

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference

to the ‘‘William H. Emery Post Office’’.

Approved June 23, 2006.

June 23, 2006

[S. 1445]
EXHIBIT 32.1

Each of, Edwin L. Adler, Chief
Executive Officer, and J. Grant Smith, Chief Financial Officer, of Clarkston Financial
Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)    
          the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended March 31,
          2005 which this statement accompanies fully complies with the requirements of
          Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2)    
          the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the
          quarterly period ended March 31, 2005 fairly presents, in all material respects,
          the financial condition and results of operations of Clarkston Financial
          Corporation.

Date: May 6, 2005

| |  | /s/ Edwin L. Adler
Edwin L. AdlerChief Executive Officer/s/ J. Grant Smith
J. Grant SmithChief Financial Officer
| |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
§ 1302.80 Enrolled pregnant women. ( a ) Within 30 days of enrollment, a program must determine whether each enrolled pregnant woman has an ongoing source of continuous, accessible health care—provided by a health care professional that maintains her ongoing health record and is not primarily a source of emergency or urgent care—and, as appropriate, health insurance coverage.
( b ) If an enrolled pregnant woman does not have a source of ongoing care as described in paragraph (a) of this section and, as appropriate, health insurance coverage, a program must, as quickly as possible, facilitate her access to such a source of care that will meet her needs.
( c ) A program must facilitate the ability of all enrolled pregnant women to access comprehensive services through referrals that, at a minimum, include nutritional counseling, food assistance, oral health care, mental health services, substance abuse prevention and treatment, and emergency shelter or transitional housing in cases of domestic violence.
( d ) A program must provide a newborn visit with each mother and baby to offer support and identify family needs. A program must schedule the newborn visit within two weeks after the infant's birth. At a minimum, the visit must include a discussion of the following: maternal mental and physical health, safe sleep, infant health, and support for basic needs.
( e ) A program must track and record services an enrolled pregnant woman receives both from the program and through referrals, to help identify specific prenatal care services and resources the enrolled pregnant woman needs to support a healthy pregnancy.
( f ) The program must provide services that help reduce barriers to healthy maternal and birthing outcomes for each family, including services that address disparities across racial and ethnic groups, and use data on enrolled pregnant women to inform program services.
[81 FR 61412, Sept. 6, 2016, as amended at 89 FR 67812, Aug. 21, 2024]
S. 992 

One Hundred Eighteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty four 

An Act 

To amend the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 to designate 

the Texas and New Mexico portions of the future Interstate-designated segments 

of the Port-to-Plains Corridor as Interstate Route 27, and for other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘I–27 Numbering Act of 2023’’. 

SEC. 2. NUMBERING OF DESIGNATED FUTURE INTERSTATE. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1105(e)(5)(C)(i) of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (Public Law 102–240) 

is amended by inserting ‘‘The routes referred to in clause (i) (other 

than subclauses (V)(aa) and (V)(bb) and subclause (IX)(aa) of that 

clause) and clause (iv) of subsection (c)(38)(A) are designated as 

Interstate Route I–27. The route referred to in subsection 

(c)(38)(A)(i)(V)(aa) is designated as Interstate Route I–27E. The 

route referred to in subsection (c)(38)(A)(i)(V)(bb) is designated as 

Interstate Route I–27W. The route referred to in subsection 

(c)(38)(A)(i)(IX)(aa) is designated as Interstate Route I–127N.’’ 

before ‘‘The route referred to in subsection (c)(45)’’. 

(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Section 1105(c)(38)(A)(i) of the 

Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (Public 

Law 102–240) is amended— 

(1) in subclause (V)— 

(A) by striking ‘‘Lamesa, the Corridor’’ and inserting 

the following: ‘‘Lamesa— 

‘‘(aa) the Corridor’’; and 

(B) in item (aa) (as so redesignated), by striking ‘‘87 

and, the Corridor’’ and inserting the following: ‘‘87; and 

‘‘(bb) the Corridor’’; and 

(2) in subclause (IX)— 

(A) by striking ‘‘(IX) United States Route 287’’ and 

inserting the following: 

‘‘(IX)(aa) United States Route 287’’; and 
S. 992—2 

(B) in item (aa) (as so redesignated), by striking ‘‘Oklahoma, 

and also United States Route 87’’ and inserting the following: ‘‘Oklahoma; and 

‘‘(bb) United States Route 87’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
§ 150.319 Determining the amount of the penalty—mitigating circumstances. For every violation subject to a civil money penalty, if there are substantial or several mitigating circumstances, the aggregate amount of the penalty is set at an amount sufficiently below the maximum permitted by § 150.315 to reflect that fact. As guidelines for taking into account the factors listed in § 150.317, CMS considers the following: ( a ) *Record of prior compliance.* It should be considered a mitigating circumstance if the responsible entity has done any of the following: ( 1 ) Before receipt of the notice issued under § 150.307, implemented and followed a compliance plan as described in § 150.311(f).
( 2 ) Had no previous complaints against it for noncompliance.
( b ) *Gravity of the violation(s).* It should be considered a mitigating circumstance if the responsible entity has done any of the following: ( 1 ) Made adjustments to its business practices to come into compliance with PHS Act requirements so that the following occur: ( i ) All employers, employees, individuals and non-Federal governmental entities are identified that are or were issued any policy, certificate of insurance or plan document, or any form used in connection therewith that failed to comply.
( ii ) All employers, employees, individuals, and non-Federal governmental plans are identified that were denied coverage or were denied a right provided under PHS Act requirements.
( iii ) Each employer, employee, individual, or non-Federal governmental plan adversely affected by the violation has been, for example, offered coverage or provided a certificate of creditable coverage in a manner that complies with PHS Act requirements that were violated so that, to the extent practicable, that employer, employee, individual, or non-Federal governmental entity is in the same position that he, she, or it would have been in had the violation not occurred.
( iv ) The adjustments are completed in a timely manner.
( 2 ) Discovered areas of noncompliance without notice from CMS and voluntarily reported that noncompliance, provided that the responsible entity submits the following: ( i ) Documentation verifying that the rights and protections of all individuals adversely affected by the noncompliance have been restored; and
( ii ) A plan of correction to prevent future similar violations.
( 3 ) Demonstrated that the violation is an isolated occurrence.
( 4 ) Demonstrated that the financial and other impacts on affected individuals is negligible or nonexistent.
( 5 ) Demonstrated that the noncompliance is correctable and that a high percentage of the violations were corrected.
[64 FR 45795, Aug. 20, 1999, as amended at 78 FR 13440, Feb. 27, 2013]
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 226 (Friday, November 24, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 67883]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9386]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Aging; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National 
Institute on Aging Special Emphasis Panel, December 4, 2006, 7 p.m. to 
December 5, 2006 6 p.m. Holiday Inn Chevy Chase, 5520 Wisconsin Avenue, 
Chevy Chase, MD 20815 which was published in the Federal Register on 
November 3, 2006, Vol. 71/64730.
    The meeting will now be held at the Hilton San Diego Airport Hotel, 
San Diego, California from December 4-5, 2006. The meeting is closed to 
the public.

    Dated: November 16, 2006.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 06-9386 Filed 11-22-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### George Sprickerhoff et al., Appellants, *v.*David Gordon, Respondent.

*Spricherhojf*v. *Gordon,*120 App. Div. 748, affirmed.

(Submitted January 26, 1909;

decided February 9, 1909.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered *578October 4, 1907, in favor of defendant upon the submission of a controversy, under section 1279 of the Code of Civil Procedure, as to the marketability of the title to certain real property.

*Mortimer M. Menken*for appellants.

*Joseph G. Engel*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Werner, Willard • Bartlett, Hisoock and Chase, JJ.
§ 1260.22 Who is responsible for the declassification of classified national security White House originated information in NARA's holdings? ( a ) NARA is responsible for declassification of information from a previous administration that was originated by: ( 1 ) The President and Vice President;
( 2 ) The White House staff;
( 3 ) Committees, commissions, or boards appointed by the President; or,
( 4 ) Others specifically providing advice and counsel to the President or acting on behalf of the President.
( b ) NARA will consult with agencies having equity in the records before making declassification determinations in accordance with sections 3.3(d)(3) and 3.6 of Executive Order 13526.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 10.4

                     TERMINATION OF STOCK PURCHASE AGREEMENT


         This Termination of Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of December
28, 2000 (this "Termination"), is entered into by and between Bionova
International, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("International"), and Bionova
Holding Corporation, a Delaware corporation formerly known as DNAP Holding
Corporation (the "Company").

                                   BACKGROUND

         WHEREAS, International and the Company entered into that certain
Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of October 1, 1998 (the "Stock Purchase
Agreement"), and the Closing contemplated by the Stock Purchase Agreement
occurred;

         WHEREAS, International and the Company are parties to that certain
Purchase Agreement dated as of December 28, 2000 (the "Purchase Agreement");

         WHEREAS, the execution and delivery of this Agreement by
International is a condition to the execution of the Purchase Agreement by
the Company;

         WHEREAS, International and the Company desire to enter into an
agreement pursuant to which the Stock Purchase Agreement shall be canceled
and be of no further force or effect as of the date of this Agreement; and

         WHEREAS, International and the Company desire to enter into this
Agreement for such purpose;

         NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual
promises and agreements contained herein and other good and valuable
consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged
by the parties hereto, the parties hereto agree as follows:

         1. The Stock Purchase Agreement is hereby canceled and of no further
force or effect. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the
parties agree that the Company has no obligation to complete the Rights
Offering (as defined in the Stock Purchase Agreement).

         2. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed and enforced in
accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware, without regard to the
principles of conflicts of laws thereof.

                                     * * *


<PAGE>


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be duly
executed by their respective authorized representatives as of the day and year
first above written.


BIONOVA HOLDING CORPORATION                     BIONOVA INTERNATIONAL, INC.


By: /s/ Bernardo Jimenez                        By: /s/ Heriberto Muzza
    -----------------------------                   --------------------------
       Name:    Bernardo Jimenez                    Name: Heriberto Muzza
       Title:  Chief Executive Officer              Title:  Director and
                                                            Treasurer















                                        2
<PAGE>

                                                                Exhibit 10.43

                                  cMeRun Corp.
                                 One Cabot Road
                                Hudson, MA 01749

DRAFT February 2, 2000

Mr. Frank Killoran
1264 129b Street
Surrey, B.C.  V4A 3Y9

RE:      NON-COMPETITION AGREEMENT

         Further to our numerous discussions and e-mails, this is to set out our
proposal relative to the captioned matter.

         We acknowledge that in the course of your involvement with cMeRun Corp.
("cMeRun" or "the Corporation"), we have come to realize that you have personal
goodwill that is of considerable benefit to the Corporation. In addition, we
acknowledge that you have personally developed significant knowledge and
experience of a personal nature applicable to the Application Service Provider
Industry in general and to the business of the Corporation in particular.
Moreover, we acknowledge that through your individual efforts, you have become
aware of and have developed business opportunities and concepts which, apart
from an agreement to the contrary, you could pursue in your personal capacity in
competition with and to the detriment of the Corporation.

         Accordingly, in consideration of the sum of $100,000, the receipt of
which you do hereby acknowledge, you hereby agree that without the prior written
consent of the Corporation you shall not for a period of three (3) years from
the date hereof either individually or in partnership or jointly or in
conjunction with any person or persons, firm, association, syndicate, company or
corporation as principal, agent, shareholder, employee, consultant or trustee:

     (a)     carry on a business in competition with the Corporation anywhere in
             North America;

     (b)     request, advise or entice in any fashion any clients to withdraw,
             curtail or cancel any business with the Corporation;

     (c)     recruit or attempt to recruit any officers or employees of the
             Corporation;

Yours very truly,


------------------------
Cameron Chell
Chairman of the Board - cMeRun Corp.

Accepted and Agreed to
this ___ day of __________, 2000


-----------------------------
Frank Killoran
# 1999 Executive Calendars

**

----

   The Executive Calendar is published by the Executive Clerk’s office in the Office of the Secretary of the Senate. The calendar is published each day the Senate is in session. These calendars list executive business items such as unanimous consent agreements, resolutions, treaties, and nominations. The calendar is identified by the date published and a volume number, which both appear on the cover of the calendar. A final calendar is published at the end of each session of Congress. For a detailed summary of the sections of the Executive Calendar, see, About the Executive Calendar.
Certification

I, Michael Strauss, certify that:


1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form
10-K of American Home Mortgage Assets Trust 2006-3 (the "Exchange Act
periodic reports");

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole,
do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to  make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by
this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in
this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the
Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer(s) have fulfilled their
obligations under the servicing agreement(s); and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of
compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be
included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and
Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances
of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report
on Form 10-K.

      In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Wells Fargo
Bank, N.A., and Citibank, N.A.
Date: March 26, 2007

                                     /s/ Michael Strauss
                                     ------------------------
                                     Name: Michael Strauss
                                     Title: President
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

____________

No. 19-5072 September Term, 2019

1:16-cv-02201-EGS

Filed On: October 3, 2019

Ted Lieu, Representative, et al.,

Appellants

v.

Federal Election Commission,

Appellee

BEFORE: Rogers, Tatel, and Srinivasan, Circuit Judges

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the motion for summary affirmance, the response thereto,

and the reply; and the motion to hold in abeyance, the response thereto, and the reply,

it is

ORDERED that the motion to hold in abeyance be dismissed as moot. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the motion for summary affirmance be granted. The

merits of the parties' positions are so clear as to warrant summary action. See

Taxpayers Watchdog, Inc. v. Stanley, 819 F.2d 294, 297 (D.C. Cir. 1987) (per curiam). 

The Federal Election Commission’s decision to dismiss the administrative complaint

was not contrary to law as the challenged contributions to independent-expenditureonly political committees cannot constitutionally be prohibited under SpeechNow.org v.

FEC, 599 F.3d 686 (D.C. Cir. 2010) (en banc), cert. denied, 562 U.S. 1003 (2010). See

52 U.S.C. § 30109(a)(8)(C); Orloski v. FEC, 795 F.2d 156, 161 (D.C. Cir. 1986). 

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk

is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution

of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App.

P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.

Per Curiam

USCA Case #19-5072 Document #1809245 Filed: 10/03/2019 Page 1 of 1
#### § 1151.43 Adoption of grievance procedures.

A recipient may adopt an internal grievance procedure in order to provide for the prompt and equitable resolution of complaints alleging any action prohibited by this part. A responsible official should be designated to coordinate the recipient's efforts in connection with this section. Such procedures need not be established with respect to complaints from applicants for employment.