alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----- Forwarded by Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US on 10/05/2009 01:50 PM

----- |------------> | From: | |------------> >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------| |"Plosay, James R (DEC)" <jim.plosay@alaska.gov> | >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------| |------------> | To: | |------------> >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------| |Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA | >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------| |------------> | Cc: | |------------> >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------| |"Edwards, Alice L S (DEC)" <alice.edwards@alaska.gov>, "Kuterbach, John F (DEC)" <john.kuterbach@alaska.gov>, "Baumgartner, James R (DEC)"| |<jim.baumgartner@alaska.gov>, "Dalcher, Debra S (DEC)" <debra.dalcher@alaska.gov> | >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------| |------------> | Date: | |------------> >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------| |10/05/2009 12:09 PM | >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------| |------------> | Subject: | |------------> >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------| |Alaska rural utility NSPS engine comments | >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------|

<<Rural Alaska NSPS engine.xlsx>> <<IC_ENGINE SOURCE TESTS.xlsx>>

Melanie –
Attached is the data requested by EPA and processed thru ADEDC’s database. I hope this meets the requirement of your information request. Please let me know if there is anything else I can provide for you.
Jim Plosay Inspector, Title V Air Permits

Title V Permit Renewal Team Leader State of Alaska DEC AQ/APP 907-465-5561 ph 907-465-5129 fx Jim.Plosay@alaska.gov (See attached file: Rural Alaska NSPS engine.xlsx)(See attached file: IC_ENGINE SOURCE TESTS.xlsx)
Exhibit 10.2

                                AMENDMENT TO THE
                            ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                           JD AMERICAN WORKWEAR, INC.


The following  articles are to be amended  pursuant to the  ratification by more
than 50% of the votes of the shareholders so entitled and upon the resolution of
the Board of Directors this 30th day of November 2000.

Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation of JD American Workwear, Inc.;

     Article  First:  The  name of the  corporation  will be  American  Commerce
     Solutions, Inc.

     Article Fourth: The total authorized shares will be increased to 31,000,000
     comprised  of  30,000,000  shares of  common  stock;  par  value  $.002 and
     1,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $.001.
§ 160.316 Refraining from intimidation or retaliation. A covered entity or business associate may not threaten, intimidate, coerce, harass, discriminate against, or take any other retaliatory action against any individual or other person for— ( a ) Filing of a complaint under § 160.306;
( b ) Testifying, assisting, or participating in an investigation, compliance review, proceeding, or hearing under this part; or
( c ) Opposing any act or practice made unlawful by this subchapter, provided the individual or person has a good faith belief that the practice opposed is unlawful, and the manner of opposition is reasonable and does not involve a disclosure of protected health information in violation of subpart E of part 164 of this subchapter.
[71 FR 8424, Feb. 16, 2006, as amended at 78 FR 5691, Jan. 25, 2013]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

PHILLIP QUINN,

Petitioner

v.

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF 

PHILADELPHIA COUNTY,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 31 EM 2023

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 5

th day of September, 2023, the Application for Leave to File 

Original Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus is DENIED.
§ 1326.31 State plan submittal and approval. ( a ) The Council shall issue a public notice about the availability of the proposed State plan or State plan amendment(s) for comment. The notice shall be published in formats accessible to individuals with developmental disabilities and the general public (*e.g.* public forums, Web sites, newspapers, and other current technologies) and shall provide a 45-day period for public review and comment. The Council shall take into account comments submitted within that period, and respond in the State plan to significant comments and suggestions. A summary of the Council's responses to State plan comments shall be submitted with the State plan and made available for public review. This document shall be made available in accessible formats upon request.
( b ) The State plan or amendment must be submitted to AIDD 45 days prior to the fiscal year for which it is applicable.
( c ) Failure to submit an approvable State plan or amendment prior to the Federal fiscal year for which it is applicable may result in the loss of Federal financial participation. Plans received during a quarter of the Federal fiscal year are approved back to the first day of the quarter so costs incurred from that point forward are approvable. Costs resulting from obligations incurred during the period of the fiscal year for which an approved plan is not in effect are not eligible for Federal financial participation.
( d ) The Secretary, or his or her designee, must approve any State plan or plan amendment provided it meets the requirements of the Act and this regulation.
Order entered July 9, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00613-CV

IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF LISA MARIE HAMMETT AND JAMES L. 

HAMMETT

On Appeal from the 417th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 417-51726-2011

ORDER

We GRANT court reporter Kathy Bounds’s July 2, 2014 request for extension of time to 

file record and ORDER the reporter’s record be filed no later than August 5, 2014.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
*Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 95-31168

Summary Calendar

_____________________

DALE BATISTE; REGINALD DAVIS;

HERMAN WASHINGTON, JR.,

Plaintiffs-Appellees,

versus

COLONIAL SUGARS, INC. (of Delaware) ET AL.,

Defendants,

and

WILLIE MARTIN and JOSEPH S. NASSAR,

Defendants-Appellants.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 92-CV-3513-L

_________________________________________________________________

October 25, 1996

Before GARWOOD, JOLLY, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Sheriff Willie Martin and former Sheriff Joseph Nassar appeal

from the denial of their motion for summary judgment. They contend
-2-

that we have jurisdiction over their appeal and contend that the

district court erred by denying their motion.

Sheriff Martin was sued in his official capacity only. We

lack jurisdiction over his appeal from the denial of summary

judgment. Aldy v. Valmet Paper Machinery, 74 F.3d 72, 75 (5th Cir.

1996); see Burns-Toole v. Byrne, 11 F.3d 1270, 1273 (5th Cir.),

cert. denied, 114 S.Ct. 2680 (1994).

Regarding Nassar, the district court rejected his qualified

immunity contention because it found genuine issues of material

fact regarding Nassar’s oversight of the investigation that

resulted in the plaintiffs’ arrests and the training of Nassar’s

subordinates. We lack jurisdiction to review the denial of summary

judgment. Johnson v. Jones, 115 S.Ct. 2151, 2159 (1995).

APPEAL DISMISSED.
§ 233.23 When assistance shall be paid under retrospective budgeting. ( a ) A State which uses retrospective budgeting shall specify in its plan that it will make assistance payments within the following time limits to recipients who file a completed report on time, and to those who are not required to file a report. A State shall choose one of two time periods for making assistance payments. The State plan shall provide that payment must be made: ( 1 ) Within 25 days from the close of the budget month; or
( 2 ) Between 25 and 45 days from the close of the budget month.
( b ) ( 1 ) Where a State makes payments between 25 and 45 days from the close of the budget month, the State plan shall provide that the State will make supplemental payments as provided in § 233.27.
( 2 ) If a State makes payments within 25 days from the close of the budget month, and also makes supplemental payments as provided in § 233.27, the State plan shall so specify.
( c ) In States which issue two checks for each payment month, these time periods apply to the first check.
[44 FR 26083, May 4, 1979]
§ 213.21 Who presides. ( a ) The presiding officer at a hearing shall be the Administrator or his designee.
( b ) The designation of the presiding officer shall be in writing. A copy of the designation shall be served on all parties.
[39 FR 40850, Nov. 21, 1974]
EXHIBIT
32








CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL


OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT


TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








I, David Rector, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Nano Holdings
International, Inc. on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended December 31, 2007, fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-KSB/A fairly
presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of Nano Holdings International, Inc..






Dated: August 8,
2008






By:         /s/ David
Rector


David Rector


Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)


and Chief Financial
Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-1613

GREGORY G. ARMENTO, d/b/a Tradewind Marketing

and Design, formerly known as Cumulus Creative

Communications,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

CITY OF ASHEVILLE; ASHEVILLE DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT OFFICE; LESLIE ANDERSON, Director,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg, District

Judge. (CA-94-58-1)

Submitted: February 27, 1997 Decided: March 10, 1997

Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gregory G. Armento, Appellant Pro Se. John Henderson Hasty, George

Bryan Adams, III, WAGGONER, HAMRICK, HASTY, MONTEITH & KRATT, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order granting

summary judgment for Defendant in his action alleging a copyright

violation and unfair and deceptive trade practices. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. Armento v. City of Asheville, No. CA-94-58-1

(W.D.N.C. Mar. 26, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### § 156.600 The definition of minimum essential coverage.

The term *minimum essential coverage* has the same meaning as provided in section 5000A(f) of the Code and its implementing regulations for purposes of this subpart.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 972 

Making emergency supplemental appropriations for the hiring and rehiring 

of additional career law enforcement officers for the fiscal year ending 

September 30, 2023, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 23, 2023 

Mr. OSSOFF (for himself and Mrs. BLACKBURN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Appropriations 

A BILL 

Making emergency supplemental appropriations for the hiring 

and rehiring of additional career law enforcement officers 

for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2023, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Filling Public Safety 

5 Vacancies Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. APPROPRIATION. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—There is appropriated, out of 

8 amounts in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, for 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 972 IS

1 the fiscal year ending September 30, 2023, to remain 

2 available until expended, $162,000,000 for additional 

3 amounts for grants for the hiring and rehiring of addi4 tional career law enforcement officers under section 1701 

5 of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets 

6 Act of 1968 (34 U.S.C. 10381). 

7 (b) BACKGROUND CHECKS AND PSYCHOLOGICAL

8 EVALUATIONS.—A law enforcement agency using amounts 

9 appropriated under subsection (a) to hire or rehire a law 

10 enforcement officer— 

11 (1) shall— 

12 (A) perform a background check on the 

13 law enforcement officer; and 

14 (B) ensure that the law enforcement offi15 cer undergoes a psychological evaluation; and 

16 (2) shall use amounts appropriated under sub17 section (a) or other funds of the law enforcement 

18 agency to cover the cost of carrying out the require19 ments under paragraph (1). 

20 SEC. 3. EMERGENCY DESIGNATION. 

21 (a) IN GENERAL.—The amounts provided by this Act 

22 are designated as an emergency requirement pursuant to 

23 section 4(g) of the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010 

24 (2 U.S.C. 933(g)). 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•S 972 IS

1 (b) DESIGNATION IN HOUSE AND SENATE.—The 

2 amounts provided by this Act are designated as being for 

3 an emergency requirement pursuant to section 4001(a)(1) 

4 of S. Con. Res. 14 (117th Congress), the concurrent reso5 lution on the budget for fiscal year 2022, and section 1(e) 

6 of H. Res. 1151 (117th Congress), as engrossed in the 

7 House of Representatives on June 8, 2022. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 72 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. J. RES. 72

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Securities and 
 Exchange Commission relating to ``The Enhancement and Standardization 
            of Climate-Related Disclosures for Investors''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 17, 2024

 Mr. Scott of South Carolina (for himself, Mr. Crapo, Mr. Rounds, Mr. 
 Tillis, Mr. Kennedy, Mr. Hagerty, Ms. Lummis, Mr. Vance, Mrs. Britt, 
    Mr. Cramer, Mr. Daines, Mr. Moran, Mr. Sullivan, Mr. Risch, Mr. 
Barrasso, Mr. Rubio, Mr. Thune, Mrs. Capito, Mr. Cassidy, Mr. Lankford, 
Mr. Hoeven, Mr. Cornyn, Mr. Grassley, Mr. Scott of Florida, Mr. Cotton, 
Mr. McConnell, Mr. Manchin, Mrs. Hyde-Smith, Mrs. Fischer, Mr. Boozman, 
Mr. Johnson, Mr. Budd, Mr. Ricketts, Mr. Braun, Mr. Tuberville, and Mr. 
 Cruz) introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice 
  and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Securities and 
 Exchange Commission relating to ``The Enhancement and Standardization 
            of Climate-Related Disclosures for Investors''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Securities and Exchange Commission relating to 
``The Enhancement and Standardization of Climate-Related Disclosures 
for Investors'' (89 Fed. Reg. 21668 (March 28, 2024)), and such rule 
shall have no force or effect.
                                 <all>
```
#### R. Montgomery Schell et al., Individually and as Ancillary Administrators of the Estate of William C. Stout, Deceased, Appellants, *v.*J. Herbert Carpenter, Individually and as Trustee under the Will of Aquilla G. Stout, Deceased, as Executor of Anne M. Stout, Deceased, and as Executor of Sarah M. de Vaugrigneuse, Deceased, et al., Respondents.

*Schell v. Carpenter,*116 App. Div. 914, affirmed.

(Argued December 11, 1907;

decided January 7, 1908.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme »Court in the first judicial department, entered December 11, 1906, affirming a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at Special Term in an action for partition.

*Alton B. Parker, Thomas Thaoher*and *John K.*Erskine, *Jr.,*for appellants.

*John S. Davenport, Stephen G. Williams*and *Curtis B. Hatheway*for respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Iíiscóck, JJ.
June 9, 2015



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

BENJAMIN K. SANCHEZ, Appellant

NO. 14- 13 -00272- CV V.

DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, AS TRUSTEE FOR SOUNDVIEW HOME LOAN TRUST 2006-OPT4, ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006-OPT4, HOMEWARD RESIDENTIAL, INC. F/K/A AMERICAN HOME MORTGAGE SERVICING, INC., AND REAL

TIME RESOLUTIONS, IN C. , Appellees

________________________________ This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellees, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Trustee for Soundview Home Loan Trust 2006- OPT4, Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2006-OPT4, Homeward Residential, Inc. f/k/a American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc., and Real Time Resolutions, Inc., signed, January 8, 2013, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find no error in the judgment. We order the judgment of the court below AFFIRMED

.
We further order this decision certified below for observance.
#### § 1206.1-2 Application of this part.

This subpart applies to programs authorized under title II of the DVSA.

[80 FR 63457, Oct. 20, 2015]
#### § 16.6 Who represents the parties.

The appellant's notice of appeal, or the first subsequent submission to the Board, should specify the name, address and telephone number of the appellant's representative. In its first submission to the Board and the appellant, the respondent (i.e., the federal party to the appeal) should specify the name, address and telephone number of the respondent's representative.
SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

ONE HUNDRED EIGHTH CONGRESS

FIRST SESSION { CONVENED JANUARY 7, 2003

SECOND SESSION {

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR

Friday, February 14, 2003

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF EMILY J. REYNOLDS,

SECRETARY OF THE SENATE

By Michelle Haynes, Executive Clerk

Issue No. 16
UNANIMOUS CONSENT AGREEMENT

Ordered, That at 10:00 a.m., on Friday, February 14, 2003, the Senate proceed to executive session to resume

consideration of the nomination of Miguel A. Estrada, of Virginia, to be United States Circuit Judge for the District

of Columbia Circuit. (Cal. No. 21)

(February 13, 2003)
CALENDAR

NO.

EX.RES

NO. SUBJECT

REPORTED

BY

RESOLUTIONS

1
CALENDAR

NO.

TREATY

DOC. NO. SUBJECT

REPORTED

BY

TREATIES

2
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH

REVIEW COMMISSION

* 17 81 Stanley C. Suboleski, of Virginia, to be a Member

of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review

Commission for a term of six years expiring

August 30, 2006, vice Marc Lincoln Marks,

term expired.

Jan 23, 2003 Reported by Mr.

Gregg, Committee on Health,

Education, Labor, and Pensions,

without printed report.

OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH

REVIEW COMMISSION

* 18 82 W. Scott Railton, of Virginia, to be a Member of

the Occupational Safety and Health Review

Commission for a term expiring April 27, 2007,

vice Gary L. Visscher, term expired.

Jan 23, 2003 Reported by Mr.

Gregg, Committee on Health,

Education, Labor, and Pensions,

without printed report.

THE JUDICIARY

21 6 Miguel A. Estrada, of Virginia, to be United

States Circuit Judge for the District of

Columbia Circuit, vice Patricia M. Wald,

retired.

Jan 30, 2003 Reported by Mr.

Hatch, Committee on the

Judiciary, without printed report.

[NEW REPORTS]

32 15 Jeffrey S. Sutton, of Ohio, to be United States

Circuit Judge for the Sixth Circuit, vice David

A. Nelson, retired.

Feb 13, 2003 Reported by Mr.

Hatch, Committee on the

Judiciary, without printed report.

* Signifies nominee’s commitment to respond to requests to appear and testify before any duly constituted committee of the Senate

NOMINATIONS

CALENDAR

NO.

MESSAGE

NO. NOMINEE, OFFICE, AND PREDECESSOR

REPORTED

BY

3
NOMINATIONS PLACED ON THE SECRETARY’S DESK

4
poh.ut 

Parraguirre 

the judgment of conviction or his sentence and he has not demonstrated 

any error, we 

ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED. 

Hardesty 

Cherry 

cc: Hon. Patrick Flanagan, District Judge 

Washoe County Public Defender 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Washoe County District Attorney 

Washoe District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 

2