alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### The HONORABLE JEAN C. HAMILTON, Chief Judge of the Unite d 1 

### States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri. ___________ No. 95-2628

___________ Richard Roe, * * Appellant, * * v. * * Paul K. Delo; Don Roper; Al * Luebbers; Charles Harris; * Appeal from the United States James Reed; Danny Berry; * District Court for the Brian O'Connell; John H. * Eastern District of Missouri. Grohmann; Phillip Nixon; * Linda Wilkson; Greg Wilson; * [UNPUBLISHED] Larry Youngman; Greg Dunn; * Fred Johnson; William * Armontrout; Dora Schriro, * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: March 6, 1996 Filed: March 12, 1996

___________ Before BEAM, LOKEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________
PER CURIAM.

Missouri inmate Richard Roe filed th is 42 U.S.C. § 1983 suit against
numerous prison officials, alleging that he was issued a false an d
re taliatory conduct violation and placed in temporary administrativ e segr egation confinement (TASC) and administrative segregation (ad seg ) without due process, and denied access to the co urts and adequate exercise while in ad seg. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of 1 defendants, and Roe appeals.

### -2- Roe was initially placed in TASC for nonpunitive, investigativ e reasons following vio lent prison disturbances; thus, he had no right to a prior hearing. See Hewitt v. Helms , 459 U.S. 46 0, 468 (1983); Brown-El v. Delo , 969 F.2d 644, 647 (8th Cir. 1992). His due process rights wer e satisfied when he received notice of the reason for the transfer, th e opportunity to make a statement, and informal reviews which resulted in hi s continued placement in TASC and ad seg. See Hewitt , 459 U.S. at 476.
Roe was subsequently found guilty of a conduct violation. Defe ndants made an unrefuted showing there was some evidence to support thi s disciplinary action. See Brown v. Frey , 807 F.2d 1407, 1412-13 (8th Cir. 1986). Roe's claim of retaliatory discipline fails because he did not sho w any prior or pending lawsuits or grievances agai nst any defendant when the conduct violation issued. See Smith v. Erickson , 961 F.2d 1387, 1388 (8th Cir. 1992) (per curiam). His due process claim that he received a false conduct violation therefore fails as well. See Sprouse v. Babcock , 87 0 F.2d 450, 45 2 (8th Cir. 1989). Finally, Roe failed to show he wa s prejudiced by the all eged denial of access to the courts, see Berdella v. Delo , 972 F.2d 204, 210 (8th Cir. 1992), and fai led to show a sufficiently serious deprivation of exercise. See Wishon v. Gammon , 978 F.2d 446, 448- 49 (8th Cir. 1992).
The judgm ent of the district court is affirmed. Defendants' motion to dismiss is denied.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
**Exhibit      32.0**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO **

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADDED BY**

**SECTION      906 OF THE **
**SARBANES-OXLEY      ACT OF 2002**

| 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The                information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations                of the Company as of and for the period covered by this                Report. |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:    | /s/                Anthony J. Szuszczewicz           |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Anthony                J. Szuszczewicz               |
|   | President                and Chief Executive Officer |
|   | March                28, 2008                        |
|   |                                                 |
|   |                                                 |
| By:    | /s/                Paul D. Rutkowski                 |
|   | Paul                D. Rutkowski                     |
|   | Chief                Financial Officer and Treasurer |
|   | March                28, 2008                        |

----
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 March 11, 2016

Order 

Clerk

March 11, 2016

151619

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

SC: 151619

v COA: 316332

Gogebic CC: 2012-000215-FC

KENNETH WAYNE PETERS, Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the application for leave to appeal is DISMISSED in 

light of the certified copy of the certificate of defendant-appellant’s death being filed with 

the clerk of the Court. See People v Posby, 459 Mich 21, 22 (1998); People v Peters, 449 

Mich 515, 521-522 (1995); People v Weston, 348 NW2d 262 (1984).
§ 160.205 Duration of effectiveness of exception determinations. An exception granted under this subpart remains in effect until: ( a ) Either the State law or the federal standard, requirement, or implementation specification that provided the basis for the exception is materially changed such that the ground for the exception no longer exists; or
( b ) The Secretary revokes the exception, based on a determination that the ground supporting the need for the exception no longer exists.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
condensed consolidated financial statements contained in the Company's quarterly
report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2000 and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                             574
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      416
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   990
<PP&E>                                          13,741
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  14,731
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           83,869
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       350,909
<OTHER-SE>                                   (420,047)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    14,731
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (7,166)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,166)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 November 6, 2013

t1030

Order 

Clerk

November 6, 2013

147382

ROBERT EDWARD ELDE,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 147382

COA: 308638

MCAC: 10-000162

CASTLES BROTHERS, INC.,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 4, 2013 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
§ 156.425 Changes in eligibility for cost-sharing reductions. ( a ) *Effective date of change in assignment.* If the Exchange notifies a QHP issuer of a change in an enrollee's eligibility for cost-sharing reductions (including a change in the individual's eligibility under the special rule for family policies set forth in § 155.305(g)(3) of this subchapter due to a change in eligibility of another individual on the same policy), then the QHP issuer must change the individual's assignment such that the individual is assigned to the applicable standard plan or plan variation of the QHP as required under § 156.410(b) as of the effective date of eligibility required by the Exchange.
( b ) *Continuity of deductible and out-of-pocket amounts.* In the case of a change in assignment to a different plan variation (or standard plan without cost-sharing reductions) of the same QHP in the course of a benefit year under this section, the QHP issuer must ensure that any cost sharing paid by the applicable individual under previous plan variations (or standard plan without cost-sharing reductions) for that benefit year is taken into account in the new plan variation (or standard plan without cost-sharing reductions) for purposes of calculating cost sharing based on aggregate spending by the individual, such as for deductibles or for the annual limitations on cost sharing.
( c ) *Notice upon assignment.* Beginning on January 1, 2016, if an individual's assignment to a standard plan or plan variation of the QHP changes in accordance with paragraph (a) of this section, the issuer must provide to that individual a summary of benefits and coverage that accurately reflects the new plan variation (or standard plan variation without cost-sharing reductions) in a manner consistent with § 147.200 of this subchapter as soon as practicable following receipt of notice from the Exchange, but not later than 7 business days following receipt of notice.
[78 FR 15535, Mar. 11, 2013, as amended at 80 FR 10875, Feb. 27, 2015]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-2000
<CASH>                                          65,418
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  475,727
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,901,855
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,873,512
<PP&E>                                       1,107,869
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,266,658
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,420,065
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,496,853
<OTHER-SE>                                     649,989
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,266,658
<SALES>                                      1,935,970
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,935,970
<CGS>                                        1,445,143
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,796,779
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              95,644
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 43,547
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             30,547
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    30,547
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.00)


</TABLE>
#### § 150.421 Appearance of counsel.

Any attorney who is to appear on behalf of a party must promptly file, with the ALJ, a notice of appearance.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS                                     3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-2001                    JAN-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-2000                    JUL-31-2000
<CASH>                                         247,721                        247,721
<SECURITIES>                                         0                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   55,695                         55,695
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                              0
<INVENTORY>                                     40,051                         40,051
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               351,969                        351,969
<PP&E>                                               0                              0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                              0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 379,505                        379,505
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,171                          5,171
<BONDS>                                              0                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                              0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                              0
<COMMON>                                        10,558                         10,558
<OTHER-SE>                                     902,884                        902,884
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   374,334                        374,334
<SALES>                                          1,709                          1,709
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,893                          6,786
<CGS>                                                0                              0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  277,552                        155,631
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              (7,184)                        (5,077)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0                              0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                              0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                              0
<CHANGES>                                            0                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (268,659)                      (148,845)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.03)                         (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.03)                         (0.01)



</TABLE>
This table was generated on 5/11/20.

Incumbent/ Contributions and Loans

Rank Candidate Name State District Party Challenger/Open From the Candidate

1 TRONE, DAVID MD 06 Democratic Party Incumbent $1,945,000

2 COLLINS, CHRISTOPHER C** NY 27 Republican Party Incumbent $500,000

3 TIMMONS, WILLIAM R IV SC 04 Republican Party Incumbent $288,942

4 MARCHANT, KENNY E MR.** TX 24 Republican Party Incumbent $285,000

5 TAYLOR, NICHOLAS V. TX 03 Republican Party Incumbent $257,951

6 BUCHANAN, VERNON FL 16 Republican Party Incumbent $250,000

7 MALONEY, CAROLYN B. NY 12 Democratic Party Incumbent $100,000

8 MURPHY, GREGORY FRANCIS NC 03 Republican Party Incumbent $100,000

9 ROSE, JOHN W. TN 06 Republican Party Incumbent $33,538

10 MITCHELL, PAUL III** MI 10 Republican Party Incumbent $24,000

11 CRAIG, ANGELA DAWN MN 02 Democratic Party Incumbent $22,100

12 CISNEROS, GILBERT CA 39 Democratic Party Incumbent $20,887

13 PETERS, SCOTT CA 52 Democratic Party Incumbent $20,555

14 CUELLAR, HENRY TX 28 Democratic Party Incumbent $11,250

15 MEUSER, DANIEL PA 09 Republican Party Incumbent $10,000

16 RIGGLEMAN, DENVER LEE MR. III VA 05 Republican Party Incumbent $10,000

17 WRIGHT, RON TX 06 Republican Party Incumbent $7,500

18 WILD, SUSAN PA 07 Democratic Party Incumbent $5,025

19 KELLER, FRED PA 12 Republican Party Incumbent $2,900

20 SAN NICOLAS, MICHAEL F.Q. MR. GU 00 Democratic Party Incumbent $1,900

21 KRISHNAMOORTHI, S. RAJA IL 08 Democratic Party Incumbent $1,807

22 CLOUD, MICHAEL TX 27 Republican Party Incumbent $1,000

23 LANGEVIN, JAMES R HONORABLE RI 02 Democratic Party Incumbent $500

24 FLETCHER, ELIZABETH TX 07 Democratic Party Incumbent $495

25 DOGGETT, LLOYD TX 35 Democratic Party Incumbent $424

26 KELLY, ROBIN IL 02 Democratic Party Incumbent $250

27 JAYAPAL, PRAMILA WA 07 Democratic Party Incumbent $200

28 SHALALA, DONNA FL 27 Democratic Party Incumbent $138

29 COURTNEY, JOSEPH D CT 02 Democratic Party Incumbent $105

30 HAGEDORN, JAMES MN 01 Republican Party Incumbent $100

31 LEVIN, ANDY MI 09 Democratic Party Incumbent $75

32 SHIMKUS, JOHN M** IL 15 Republican Party Incumbent $67

33 BACON, DONALD J NE 02 Republican Party Incumbent $65

34 LEE, SUSIE NV 03 Democratic Party Incumbent $45

35 ROUDA, HARLEY E JR CA 48 Democratic Party Incumbent $25

36 GRAVES, GARRET LA 06 Republican Party Incumbent $20

**This individual is no longer a candidate seeking election to this office.

Congressional Candidate Table 9d

Top 50* House Incumbent Campaigns by Contributions and Loans from the Candidate

January 1, 2019 - March 31, 2020

*Only 36 committees of congressional candidates reported loans from the candidate.
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 226 (Friday, November 24, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 67847]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9348]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Opal Creek Scenic Recreation Area (SRA) Advisory Council

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An Opal Creek Scenic Recreation Area Advisory Council meeting 
will convene in Stayton, Oregon on Wednesday, December 6, 2006. The 
meeting is scheduled to begin at 6:30 p.m., and will conclude at 
approximately 8:30 p.m. The meeting will be held in the South Room of 
the Stayton Community Center located on 400 West Virginia Street in 
Stayton, Oregon.
    The Opal Creek Wilderness and Opal Creek Scenic Recreation Area Act 
of 1996 (Opal Creek Act) (Pub. L. 104-208) directed the Secretary of 
Agriculture to establish the Opal Creek Scenic Recreation Area Advisory 
Council. The Advisory Council is comprised of 13 members representing 
state, county and city governments, and representatives of various 
organizations, which include mining industry, environmental 
organizations, inholders in Opal Creek Scenic Recreation Area, economic 
development, Indian tribes, adjacent landowners and recreation 
interests. The council provides advice to the Secretary of Agriculture 
on preparation of a comprehensive Opal Creek Management Plan for the 
SRA, and consults on a periodic and regular basis on the management of 
the area. Tentative agenda items include: Subcommittee reports and 
recommendations, and Three Pools Site Rehabilitation Project proposal 
recommendations.
    A direct public comment period is tentatively scheduled to begin at 
8 p.m. Time allotted for individual presentations will be limited to 3 
minutes. Written comments are encouraged, particularly if the material 
cannot be presented within the time limits of the comment period. 
Written comments may be submitted prior to the December 6th meeting by 
sending them to Designated Federal Official Paul Matter at the address 
given below.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For more information regarding this 
meeting, contact Designated Federal Official Paul Matter; Willamette 
National Forest, Detroit Ranger District, HC 73 Box 320, Mill City, OR 
97360; (503) 854-3366.

    Dated: November 16, 2006.
Douglas R. Ledgerwood,
Acting Forest Supervisor.

    Disclaimer: This meeting notice is being published less than 15 
days prior to the meeting due to an administrative error in 
processing. The upcoming meeting is time sensitive and is in the 
best interest of the Opal Creek SRA Advisory Council and the public. 
Public notification of this meeting is also occurring through news 
releases and Opal Creek Web site calendar that has been posted for 
several months. This late notice is authorized under 41 CFR 
1016.1015(b)(2).
[FR Doc. 06-9348 Filed 11-22-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

In the Matter of ) 

) A21-05 

Proposed Final Audit Report on Sheila ) 

Jackson Lee for Congress ) 

CERTIFICATION 

I, Vicktoria J. Allen, Deputy Secretary of the Federal Election 

Commission, do hereby certify that on March 06, 2023, the Commission 

decided by a vote of 5-0 to approve the Proposed Final Audit Report on Sheila 

Jackson Lee for Congress, as recommended in the Memorandum from the Chief 

Compliance Officer and the Audit Division dated February 9, 2023, subject to 

the edits circulated by Commissioner Cooksey’s Office on February 28, 2023 at 

5:13 pm. 

Commissioners Broussard, Cooksey, Dickerson, Trainor, and Weintraub 

voted affirmatively for the decision. Commissioner Lindenbaum recused 

herself with respect to this matter and did not vote. 

March 6, 2023 

Date 

Attest: 

Digitally signed by Vicktoria J Vicktoria J Allen Allen

Date: 2023.03.06 14:22:18 -05'00' 

Vicktoria J. Allen 

Deputy Secretary of the Commission