alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, J.Paul Whitehead III, certify that:

1.    I havereviewed this report on Form 10-Q of CompuCredit Corporation;

2.    Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and

3.    Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report.

4.    Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a)               designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)              evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c)               disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the fourthfiscal period in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, oris reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and

5.    Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a)               all significantdeficiencies in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)              anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.
| Date: August 3, 2004 |                           |
|---------------------------|--------------------------------|
| * *                  | /s/ J.Paul Whitehead, III |
| * *                  | J.Paul  Whitehead, III    |
| * *                  | *Chief  Financial Officer*     |

 

----
SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

ONE HUNDRED FOURTH CONGRESS 

FIRST SESSION { CONVENEO JANUARY U 99S 

SECOND SESSION { 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Thursday, June 8, 1995 

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF SHEILA P. BURKE, SECRETARY OF THE SENATE 

By Gerald A. Hackett, Executive Clerk 
1 

RESOLUTIONS 

~ 

CALENDAR Ex REs REPORTED 

No No SUBJECJ' BY 
2 

TREATIES 

CALENDAR TREATY REPORTED 

No. Doc. No. SUBJECT 

Bv 
3 

NOMINATIONS 

CAL£1'-"DAR MESSAGE REPORTED 

No N o NOMU."EE, OFFICE. A.ND PREDECESSOR BY 

RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD 

* 101 32 VIrgil M. Speakman, of Ohio, to be a Member of Mar 29, 95 Reported by Mrs. 

the Railroad Retirement Board, for a term Kassebaum, Committee on Labor 

expui.ng August 28, 1999. (Reappointment) and Human Resources, without 

printed report. 

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN 

SERVICES 

* 174 245 Henry W. Foster , Jr., ofTennessee, to be Medical May 26, 95 Reported by Mrs. 

Director in the Regular Corps of the Public Kassebaum, Committee on Labor 

Health Service, subject to qualifications and Human Resources, without 

therefor as provided by law and regulations, printed report. 

and to be Surgeon Gener al of the Public 

Health Service, for a term of four years, vice 

M. Joycelyn Elders, resigned. 

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE 

175 374 Robert F. Rider, ofDelaware, to be a Governor of Jun 5, 95 Reported by Mr. Roth, 

the United States Postal Service for the term Committee on Governmental 

expiring December 8, 2004. (Reappointment) Affairs, without printed report. 

' 

* Stgmfies nommee's commttment to respond to requests to appear and testtfy before any duly conshtuted commtttee of the Senate 
4 

NOMINATIONS PLACED ON THE SECRETARY'S DESK
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 117 (Tuesday, June 18, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 36571]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-14426]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Ocean Energy Management

[MMAA104000]

Extension of Post-Sale Evaluation Period for Central Gulf of 
Mexico Planning Area Lease Sale 227

AGENCY: Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM), Interior.

ACTION: Notice to Extend Post-Sale Evaluation Period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice extends through July 18, 2013, the post-sale 
evaluation period for Central Gulf of Mexico Planning Area Lease Sale 
227. BOEM will complete the evaluation process for all bids received in 
this sale by July 18, 2013. This action is necessary due to resource 
limitations resulting from sequestration. BOEM is unable to pay 
overtime to expedite the bid review process, including the 
incorporation of increased volumes of reprocessed proprietary datasets 
used by bidders to formulate their bid submittals.

DATES: The post-sale evaluation period for this sale will conclude on 
July 18, 2013.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In connection with the Central Gulf of 
Mexico Lease Sale 227, held March 20, 2013, BOEM received 407 bids on 
320 tracts. On April 3, 2013, BOEM accepted the high bids on 42 tracts 
and passed the bids on another 278 tracts to Phase 2 of the post-sale 
evaluation period for detailed evaluation. As of Friday, May 31, 2013, 
BOEM had completed the evaluation and deemed acceptable the high bids 
offered on 163 of the tracts passed to Phase 2. BOEM is continuing the 
bid evaluation process for the remaining 115 tracts.
    As a result of these circumstances, BOEM requires additional time 
to complete the bid review process, originally scheduled to conclude 
within 90 days following the Sale 227 sale date, that is, by June 18, 
2013. Under the provisions of 30 CFR Sec.  556.47(e)(2), BOEM is 
extending the bid evaluation period until July 18, 2013.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Cooke, Regional Supervisor, 
Office of Resource Evaluation, Gulf of Mexico Region, telephone 504-
736-2710.

     Dated: June 11, 2013.
Walter D. Cruickshank,
Deputy Director, Bureau of Ocean and Energy Management.
[FR Doc. 2013-14426 Filed 6-17-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-MR-P
```
lANCE R. LEFLEUR 

DIRECTOR ADE 

Alabama Department of Environmental Management 

adem.alabama.gov 

1400 Coliseum Blvd. 36110-2400 • Post Office Box 301463 

Montgomery, Alabama 36130-1463 

(334) 271-7700 • FAX (334) 271-7950 

February 28, 2012 

Ms. Gwendolyn Keyes Fleming 

Regional Administrator, EPA Region 4 

Atlanta Federal Center 

61 Forsyth Street, S.W. 

Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960 

Dear Ms Fleming: 

RoBERT J. BENTLEY 

GovERNOR 

On December 8, 2011, after considering Alabama's March 12, 2009 and October 11, 

2011 ozone designation recommendations, 2008-2010 air quality data and other relevant 

technical information, EPA issued a letter stating its intent to designate the entire State of 

Alabama as unclassifiable/attainment for the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS. This letter is in 

response to EPA's December 8, 2011 letter. 

The process for designating areas following promulgation of a new or revised NAAQS is 

contained in Clean Air Act (CAA) section 107 (d)(l)(A)(i), (ii), and (iii) (42 U.S.C. 7407). This 

section of the CAA identifies three potential classifications: nonattainment, attainment and 

unclassifiable. Given that the designation of unclassifiable/attainment is not included in the CAA 

as a potential classification, ADEM recommends that the entire State of Alabama be designated 

as attainment. We believe this classification is consistent with the intent of the CAA, as all 

monitors in the State, including our most populous areas, indicate attainment of the 2008 8-hour 

ozone NAAQS. 

If you have any questions, please contact ADEM Air Division Chief Ronald Gore at 334-

271-7868 or by e-mail at rwg@adem.state.al. us. 

LRLIRWG/ghe 

cc: Beverly Banister, EPA Region 4 

Birmingham Branch 

110 Vulcan Road 

Birmingham, AL 35209-4702 

(205) 942-6168 

(205) 941-1603 (FAX) 

Decatur Branch 

2715 Sandlin Road, S. W. 

Decatur, AL 35603-1333 

(256) 353-1713 

(256) 340-9359 (FAX) 

Sincerely, 

«I?~ 

\. 

Lance R. LeFleur 

Director 

I I Mobile Branch 

2204 Perimeter Road 

Mobile, AL 36615-1131 

(251) 450-3400 

(251) 479·2593 (FAX) 

Mobile-Coastal 

4171 Commanders Drive 

Mobile, AL 36615-1421 

(251) 432-6533 

(251) 432-6598 (FAX)
§ 1321.29 Public participation. The State agency shall: ( a ) Have mechanisms and varied methods to obtain the views of older individuals, family caregivers, service providers, and the public on a periodic basis, with a focus on those in greatest economic need and greatest social need;
( b ) Consider those views in developing and administering the State plan and policies and procedures regarding services provided under the plan;
( c ) Establish and comply with a reasonable minimum time period (at least 30 calendar days) for public review and comment on new State plans as set forth in § 1321.27 and State plan amendments requiring approval of the Assistant Secretary for Aging as set forth in § 1321.31(a). State agencies may request a waiver of the minimum time period from the Assistant Secretary for Aging during an emergency or when a time sensitive action is otherwise necessary;
( d ) Ensure the documents noted in paragraph (c) of this section and final State plans and amendments are available to the public for review, as well as available in alternative formats and other languages if requested.
§ 9.4 Surface disturbance moratorium. ( a ) For a period of four years after September 28, 1976, no operator of a claim located within the boundaries of Death Valley National Monument, Mount McKinley National Park, or Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument (see also claims subject to § 9.10(a)(3)) shall disturb for purposes of mineral exploration or development the surface of any lands which had not been significantly disturbed for purposes of mineral extraction prior to February 29, 1976, except as provided in this section. However, where a claim is subject, for a peroid of four years after September 28, 1976, to this section solely by virtue of § 9.10(a)(3), the date before which there must have been significant disturbance for purposes of mineral extraction is January 26, 1977.
( b ) An operator of a claim in one of these units seeking to enlarge an existing excavation or otherwise disturb the surface for purposes of mineral exploration or development shall file with the Superintendent an application stating his need to disturb additional surface in order to maintain production at an annual rate not to exceed an average annual production level of said operations for the three calendar years 1973, 1974, and 1975. Accompanying the application shall be a plan of operations which complies with § 9.9 and verified copies of production records for the years 1973, 1974, and 1975.
( c ) If the Regional Director finds that the submitted plan of operations complies with § 9.9, that enlargement of the existing excavation of an individual mining operation is necessary in order to make feasible continued production therefrom at an annual rate not to exceed the average annual production level of said operation for the three calendar years 1973, 1974, and 1975, and that the plan of operations meets the applicable standard of approval of § 9.10(a)(1), he shall issue a permit allowing the disturbance of the surface of the lands contiguous to the existing excavation to the minimum extent necessary to effect such enlargement. For the purpose of this section “lands contiguous to the existing excavation” shall include land which actually adjoins the existing excavation or which could logically become an extension of the excavation; for example, drilling to determine the extent and direction to which the existing excavation should be extended may be permitted at a site which does not actually adjoin the excavating.
( d ) The appropriate reclamation standard to be applied will be determined by the nature of the claim. (See §§ 9.11(a)(1) and (a)(2).)
( e ) Operations conducted under a permit pursuant to this section shall be subject to all the limitations imposed by this part.
( f ) For the purposes of this section, each separate mining excavation shall be treated as an individual mining operation.
§ 51.81 May the Director include “special account” provisions in concession contracts? ( a ) The Director may not include in concession contracts “special account” provisions, that is, contract provisions which require or authorize a concessioner to undertake with a specified percentage of the concessioner's gross receipts the construction of real property improvements, including, without limitation, capital improvements on park lands. The construction of capital improvements will be undertaken only pursuant to the leasehold surrender interest provisions of this part and the applicable concession contract.
( b ) Concession contracts may contain provisions that require the concessioner to set aside a percentage of its gross receipts or other funds in a component renewal reserve to be used at the direction of the Director solely for renewal of real property components located in park areas and utilized by the concessioner in its operations. The anticipated timing and estimated costs of component renewal projects should be identified in the prospectus. Component renewal reserve funds may not be expended to construct real property improvements, including, without limitation, capital improvements. Component renewal reserve provisions may not be included in concession contracts in lieu of a franchise fee, and funds from these reserves will be expended only for the renewal of real property components as identified in the contract and assigned to the concessioner by the Director for use in its operations. The component renewal reserve provides a mechanism for a concessioner to reserve monies to fund component renewal projects. Concessioner obligations to maintain assigned concession facilities including component renewal are not limited to the monies in the component renewal reserve.
( c ) A concession contract must require the concessioner to maintain in good condition through a comprehensive repair and maintenance program all of the concessioner's personal property used in the performance of the concession contract and all real property improvements, including, without limitation, capital improvements, and, government personal property, assigned to the concessioner by a concession contract.
[65 FR 20668, Apr. 17, 2000, as amended at 88 FR 90119, Dec. 29, 2023]
**Memo to File**

**From: Kathryn Kelley**  **Date: 9** **/20/12** On September 20, 2012 EPA attended a listening session with a representative from the Canadian Ship Owners Association (CSA)
. Attendees are the following: **Name Affiliation**  Robert Lewis
- Manning CSA Debbie Murray CSA Ryan Albert EPA Kathry n Kelley EPA The representative s from CSA raised concerns about the availability of technology

and ty pe approval process for ballast water treatment and c oordination between EPA and the U.S. Coast Guard on dates for implementation.
SEN.ATE OF THE UNITED ST ATES 

NINETY-EIGHTH CONGRESS 

FIRST SESSION { 

Convened January 3, 1983 

Adjourned November 18, 1983 

Convened January 2 3, 1984 

SECOND SESSION { 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Friday, January 27, 1984 

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF WILLIAM F. HILDENBRAND, 

SECRETARY OF THE SENATE 

By Gerald A. Hackett, Executive Clerk 
MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION 

Mar. 8, 1983-- Motion entered to reconsider the vote by which the resolution of 

ratification to the Montreal Protocols No. 3 and 4 (Ex. B., 95-1) was defeated--Mr. 

Baker. 
1 

TREATIES 

Calendar Treaty Subject Reported 

No. Doc. No. Bv 

1 EX. B, Montreal Aviation Protocols Nos. 3 and 4 Feb 10 83 Reported 

95-1 favorably, by Mr. Percy, 

Committee on Foreign 

Relations, with a proposed 

resolution of advice and 

consent to ratification 

with conditions (Printed 

reoort--Ex. Rept. 98-1)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Civil Action No. 19-1021 (TJK)

LEIGH BROWN et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION,

Defendant.

ORDER

For the reasons set forth in the Court’s accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby 

ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction, ECF No. 12, is DENIED. 

SO ORDERED.

/s/ Timothy J. Kelly

TIMOTHY J. KELLY

United States District Judge

Date: May 13, 2019

Case 1:19-cv-01021-TJK Document 18 Filed 05/13/19 Page 1 of 1
§ 150.317 Factors CMS uses to determine the amount of penalty. In determining the amount of any penalty, CMS takes into account the following: ( a ) *The entity's previous record of compliance.* This may include any of the following: ( 1 ) Any history of prior violations by the responsible entity, including whether, at any time before determination of the current violation or violations, CMS or any State found the responsible entity liable for civil or administrative sanctions in connection with a violation of PHS Act requirements.
( 2 ) Documentation that the responsible entity has submitted its policy forms to CMS for compliance review.
( 3 ) Evidence that the responsible entity has never had a complaint for noncompliance with PHS Act requirements filed with a State or CMS.
( 4 ) Such other factors as justice may require.
( b ) *The gravity of the violation.* This may include any of the following: ( 1 ) The frequency of the violation, taking into consideration whether any violation is an isolated occurrence, represents a pattern, or is widespread.
( 2 ) The level of financial and other impacts on affected individuals.
( 3 ) Other factors as justice may require.
[64 FR 45795, Aug. 20, 1999, as amended at 78 FR 13440, Feb. 27, 2013]
III 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 36 

Authorizing the use of Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center 

for an event to celebrate the birthday of King Kamehameha I. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 8, 2024 

Mr. SCHATZ (for himself and Ms. HIRONO) submitted the following concurrent 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the use of Emancipation Hall in the Capitol 

Visitor Center for an event to celebrate the birthday 

of King Kamehameha I. 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), 

3 SECTION 1. USE OF EMANCIPATION HALL FOR EVENT TO 

4 CELEBRATE BIRTHDAY OF KING KAMEHA5 MEHA I. 

6 (a) AUTHORIZATION.—Emancipation Hall in the 

7 Capitol Visitor Center is authorized to be used on June 

8 16, 2024, for an event to celebrate the birthday of King 

9 Kamehameha I. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•SCON 36 ATS 

1 (b) PREPARATIONS.—Physical preparations for the 

2 conduct of the event described in subsection (a) shall be 

3 carried out in accordance with such conditions as may be 

4 prescribed by the Architect of the Capitol. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Exhibit 23

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Stockholders

Alberto-Culver Company:

We consent to the incorporation
by reference in the registration statements on Form S-8 (Number 333-138794) and Form S-3 (Numbers 333-49649 and 333-54302) of Alberto-Culver Company of our reports dated November 28, 2007, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of
Alberto-Culver Company and subsidiaries as of September 30, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, cash flows and stockholders equity and the related financial statement schedule for each of the years in the
three-year period ended September 30, 2007, and managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2007 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as
of September 30, 2007, which reports appear in the September 30, 2007 annual report on Form 10-K of Alberto-Culver Company.

Our
report refers to changes in the Companys method of accounting for stock-based compensation effective October 1, 2005.



|                 
|-----------------
|/s/ KPMG LLP     
|                 
|KPMG LLP         
|Chicago, Illinois
|November 28, 2007
#### § 1177.26 Consideration of tax consequences to the Government.

In negotiating a compromise, NEH will consider the tax consequences to the Government. In particular, NEH will consider requiring a waiver of the debtor's tax-loss-carry-forward and tax-loss-carry-back rights. For information on discharge of indebtedness reporting requirements, see § 1177.32.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fox Entertainment Group, Inc. (the *“Company”*) on Form 10-Q for the quarter endedDecember 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the *“Report”*), I, K. Rupert Murdoch, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, asadopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: 

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

/S/    K. RUPERT MURDOCH

----
SCPW-21-0000073 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I

CHRIS SLAVICK, Petitioner

vs. STATE OF HAWAI # I, Respondent.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (CAAP-20-0000076; CASE NO. 1PR191000014) ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Wilson, and Eddins, JJ.)

Upon consideration of petitioner Christopher Lee Slavick’s “Motion for Release of Prisoner Pending Disposition of Application for Habeas Corpus,” which was filed as a petition for writ of mandamus on February 17, 2021, and the record, it appears that petitioner fails to present any basis upon which he is entitled to be released from custody by this court, and has alternative means to seek relief, including seeking release from the Hawai # i Paroling Authority, as provided by law. Petitioner, therefore, is not entitled to the requested extraordinary writ. See Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawai # i 200, 204, 982 P.2d 334, 338 (1999) (a writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will not Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-21-0000073 26-FEB-2021 08:34 AM Dkt. 5 ODDPissue unless the petitioner demonstrates a clear and indisputable

right to relief and a lack of alternative means to redress adequately the alleged wrong or obtain the requested action). Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk of the appellate court shall process the petition for writ of mandamus without payment of the filing fee.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, February 26, 2021. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Michael D. Wilson /s/ Todd W. Eddins

2