alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Date of 

report 

1969 I 

Oct 27 

~tutttr nf tqt luitt~ ~tntts NINETY-FIRST CONGRESS 

FIRST SESSION {Convened January 3, 1969 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Prepared under the direction of FRANCIS R. VALEO, Secretary of the Senate 

By GERALD A HACKETT, Executive Clerk 

Tuesday, October 28, 1969 

NOMINATIONS 

Calendar Message Name of nommee Oflice Predecessor No No 

U.S. ARMY 

647 4'l3 The Army Nat.10nal Guard 

of the Umted States 

officer~ named herem for 

promotiOn as Reserve 

comm1ss!oned officers of 

the Army, under provt510ns of t1tle 10, 

Umtcd St.1teb Code, 

~ec 593(a) and 3392 

647 483 Bng Gen Roq~ Ayers, MaJor generaL ____________ 

0378526, Gener.1l of the 

hnc 

647 483 Col .bck~on Bogle, Bngad1er generaL _________ 

0461234, AdJutant 

Gener.il's Coipb 

-----"" 

37-022-69-No 96 

L r.UIJER MEN PRINTING OFFICE 1969
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

THOMAS D. WALTERS AND CLARA M. WALTERS, HIS WIFE

v.

UPMC PRESBYTERIAN SHADYSIDE; MAXIM HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC.,

AND MEDICAL SOLUTIONS L.L.C. D/B/A

MEDICAL SOLUTIONS

PETITION OF: MAXIM HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC. :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 422 WAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

LINDA FICKEN AND WILLIAM FICKEN,

HER HUSBAND

v.

UPMC PRESBYTERIAN SHADYSIDE; MAXIM HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC.,

AND MEDICAL SOLUTIONS L.L.C. D/B/A

MEDICAL SOLUTIONS

PETITION OF: MAXIM HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC. :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 423 WAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

WANDA J. BRAUN AND EDWIN J. BRAUN, HER HUSBAND

v.

UPMC PRESBYTERIAN SHADYSIDE; MAXIM HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC.,

AND MEDICAL SOLUTIONS L.L.C. D/B/A :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 424 WAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court[ 422 WAL 2016, 423 WAL 2016, 424 WAL 2016 and 425 WAL 2016 ]

- 2

MEDICAL SOLUTIONS

PETITION OF: MAXIM HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC. :

:

:

:

:

RONNIE D. MURPHY AND CONNIE E. MCNEAL, AS CO

- EXECUTORS OF THE ESTATE OF ELEANOR Y. MURPHY,

AND IN THEIR OWN RIGHT

v.

UPMC PRESBYTERIAN SHADYSIDE, MAXIN HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC.,

AND MEDICAL SOLUTIONS L.L.C. D/B/A

MEDICAL SOLUTIONS

PETITION OF: MAXIM HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC. :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 425 WAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 18th day of April, 2017, the Application to File Reply in Further

Support of Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED as moot. The Petition for

Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues as stated by petitioner are:

(1) Whether, in an issue of first impression and of critical statewide importance, the Superior Court Majority violated longstanding precedent and deviated from existing law when it imposed upon a staffing agency a duty in negligence requiring it to protect the public against intentional acts of a former employee, in circumstances where: (i) there was no allegation that the staffing agency had notice that the employee had committed the

same or similar offenses while employed with the agency; and (ii) the intentional acts occurred in a different state, two years after the employee's employment relationship with the staffing agency ended?[ 422 WAL 2016, 423 WAL 2016, 424 WAL 2016 and 425 WAL 2016 ]

- 3

(2) Whether, in an issue of first impression and statewide importance, the

Superio r Court Majority violated well

- established rules of civil procedure

and longstanding precedent by supplying facts, and then relying on those

facts for its conclusions, in circumstances where those facts clearly do not

appear in Plaintiffs' Complaint?

Just ice Mundy did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
ITED TATE

E IRONMENTAL PROTECTIO GE C

DOCKET 0.: CAA-08-2011-0023 011 0 -3 8

tN T E MATTER OF:

OG RESOURCES, INC.

RE PO DENT.

)

)

)

)

)

ORDER 0 JOINT

MOTION TO AME D

ADMlNl TATIVE COMPLAINT

A n 0 T REEME T

On ovem er 2011, the Parties filed a. Joint Motjon to Amend dministrative

omplaint and Consent Agreement. The Motion Teque ts, pur uant to paragraphs D.l.a and F.13

ofthe Agreement that the Complaint and Consent Agreement b amended to include a Revised

Appendix A and modification ofthe penalty.

Th Revised App ndi' A substitut th original Appendi A by adding one' urcc thot

was inadveli ntly omitted, updating information r lated to two ur e and pl itting I1

additional source to three sources due to a rec nfiguration offacilities. This amendment

increases the number of existing emission soW"ces from 137 to 140 and th reby increases the

p naJty t $420,000 from $4] 1 000 as cont mp1at d by paragraph E.1 o' th original

Administrative omplaint and Con ent Agr emellt.

The Parti salsa r que t the am nd d docum nt contain th OlTecl zip code for

Notification in Section D.

The c urt hereby approves the Motion to Amend to include the Revi ed Appendix A, the

m lification to paragraph E.1 ba d on the term of the Complaint and ons nt Agr ement and

then>wzip odein cti nOforg odcau e h wn,pursuantt 40 .'.R. §'22.14(c),22.16(c)

and _2.18(b)(2). The Respondent .is her by ORDERED to comply with all ofthe terms ofthe

onsent Agreement which was effective 00 August 29 20 II by Final Order.

o ORDERED TID.' ---:>IIO....-__DAY F _-== _

Elyana R. utio

Regional Judicial fficer
CERTI FICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that the original of the attached ORDER JOINT

MOTION TO AMEND ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT AND CONSNET

ACRE~:MENTin the matter or EOC RESOURCES INC., DOCKET NO.: CAA-08-

201 1~()o23 wns filed with thl: Rcgionailleurin£ Clerk was filed on November 3. 2011.

Further. th" undersigned ~l.'rti fies thut a true and correct copy of Ih\.' document was

delivered to James II. Eppers. Senior Enforcement Attorney, U. S, EPA - Region 8.1595

Wynkoop Strl.:cI, Denver. CO 80202-1129, True and corrl.;:cl copies nl'thc

aforementioned doculllcni was plac~d in the Unit.ed States mail via certified/return receipt

anu e-mail On Novcmbcr 3. 201 I, LO:

Edward Lewis

Pulbright and Ja\.vorski. LLP

1301 McKinney. Suitc5100

HOuston. TX 77010-3095

cicwis@fulbriglll.com

November 3.2011 Jvuiv~ Tina Artemis

]laralcgal/Rcgionaillearing Clerk

*Printed on Recycfed Papel
§ 155.635 Right to appeal. ( a ) For an application submitted before October 15, 2014, the Exchange must include the notice of the right to appeal and instructions regarding how to file an appeal in any notification issued in accordance with § 155.610(i).
( b ) For an application submitted on or after October 15, 2014, the Exchange must include the notice of the right to appeal and instructions regarding how to file an appeal in any notification issued in accordance with §§ 155.610(i) and 155.625(b)(2)(i).
#### § 16.1 What this part does.

This part contains requirements and procedures applicable to certain disputes arising under the HHS programs described in appendix A. This part is designed to provide a fair, impartial, quick and flexible process for appeal from written final decisions. This part supplements the provisions in part 75 of this title.

[46 FR 43817, Aug. 31, 1981, as amended at 81 FR 3012, Jan. 20, 2016]
IIA 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 33 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to prohibit 

the use of slavery and involuntary servitude as a punishment for a crime. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 14, 2023 

Mr. MERKLEY (for himself and Mr. BOOKER) introduced the following joint 

resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the 

Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States to prohibit the use of slavery and involuntary 

servitude as a punishment for a crime. 

Whereas the Constitution of the United States has prohibited 

slavery and involuntary servitude for many, but not all, 

people in the United States since December 6, 1865; 

Whereas the Thirteenth Amendment to the Constitution of 

the United States, which barred slavery and involuntary 

servitude, included an exception that allowed for slavery 

and involuntary servitude to continue as punishment for 

a crime; 

Whereas this exception resulted in hundreds of thousands of 

Black Americans being returned to slavery after implementation of the Thirteenth Amendment; 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•SJ 33 IS 

Whereas Congress finds the continued existence of slavery 

and involuntary servitude antithetical to the democratic 

values, norms, and mores of the United States and can 

undermine the moral credibility of our country on the 

global stage; 

Whereas our criminal justice system has the means to ensure 

people who have committed crimes are appropriately sentenced without resorting to slavery or involuntary servitude; 

Whereas Congress recognizes the value of high-quality work 

programs that provide useful skills and stability for people in correctional institutions, and it is not the intent of 

Congress to interfere with opportunities for incarcerated 

people to consent to work or to modify any employment 

protections currently available to people in correctional 

institutions; and 

Whereas Congress additionally acknowledges the importance 

of sentencing alternatives, and it is not the purpose of 

this amendment to interfere with the discretion of a court 

to offer community service as an alternative to incarceration: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 

8 States: 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•SJ 33 IS 

1 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

2 ‘‘Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude may be 

3 imposed as a punishment for a crime.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
#### § 1225.1 Purpose.

The purpose of this part is to establish a procedure for the filing, investigation, and administrative determination of allegations of discrimination based on race, color, national origin, religion, age, sex, disability or political affiliation, which arise in connection with the recruitment, selection, placement, service, or termination of AmeriCorps and AmeriCorps Seniors applicants, candidates, Members and Volunteers for part time and full time service, as appropriate.
BILLING CODE: 6715-01-M 

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE: 

THURSDAY, MARCH 10, 2022 AT 10:00 A.M.

PLACE:

HYBRID MEETING: 1050 FIRST STREET, N.E. WASHINGTON, D.C. (12TH FLOOR) 

AND VIRTUAL. NOTE: DUE TO THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC, THE FEC’S HEARING 

ROOM REMAINS CLOSED TO VISITORS FOR THE NEAR TERM AS WE 

IMPLEMENT PROCEDURES FOR THE PUBLIC TO SAFELY ATTEND. IF YOU 

WOULD LIKE TO ACCESS THE MEETING, SEE THE INSTRUCTIONS BELOW.

STATUS:

THIS MEETING WILL BE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC. TO ACCESS THE VIRTUAL 

MEETING, GO TO THE COMMISSION’S WEBSITE www.fec.gov AND CLICK ON THE 

BANNER TO BE TAKEN TO THE MEETING PAGE.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Draft Advisory Opinion 2022-01: Joan Farr for U.S. Senate OK and KS

Revised Form 1

Resubmission: Audit Division Recommendation Memorandum on Mike 

Braun for Indiana (A19-02) 

Management and Administrative Matters

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Judith Ingram, Press Officer

Telephone: (202) 694-1220

Authority: Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b

Signed: _____________________________________

Laura E. Sinram 

Acting Secretary and Clerk of the Commission

Submitted: March 1, 2022
# EUR-Lex - 12008M007 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008M007

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on European Union - TITLE I: COMMON PROVISIONS - Article 7 (ex Article 7 TEU) **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0019 - 0020 *

Article 7

(ex Article 7 TEU)

1. On a reasoned proposal by one third of the Member States, by the European Parliament or by the European Commission, the Council, acting by a majority of four fifths of its members after obtaining the consent of the European Parliament, may determine that there is a clear risk of a serious breach by a Member State of the values referred to in Article 2. Before making such a determination, the Council shall hear the Member State in question and may address recommendations to it, acting in accordance with the same procedure.

The Council shall regularly verify that the grounds on which such a determination was made continue to apply.

2. The European Council, acting by unanimity on a proposal by one third of the Member States or by the Commission and after obtaining the consent of the European Parliament, may determine the existence of a serious and persistent breach by a Member State of the values referred to in Article 2, after inviting the Member State in question to submit its observations.

3. Where a determination under paragraph 2 has been made, the Council, acting by a qualified majority, may decide to suspend certain of the rights deriving from the application of the Treaties to the Member State in question, including the voting rights of the representative of the government of that Member State in the Council. In doing so, the Council shall take into account the possible consequences of such a suspension on the rights and obligations of natural and legal persons.

The obligations of the Member State in question under this Treaty shall in any case continue to be binding on that State.

4. The Council, acting by a qualified majority, may decide subsequently to vary or revoke measures taken under paragraph 3 in response to changes in the situation which led to their being imposed.

5. The voting arrangements applying to the European Parliament, the European Council and the Council for the purposes of this Article are laid down in Article 354 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

--------------------------------------------------
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE HEAFNER
TIRE GROUP, INC. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. CERTAIN 1999 AMOUNTS HAVE
BEEN RECLASSIFIED TO CONFORM WITH THE 2000 PRESENTATION.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           6,249
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  114,713
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,115
<INVENTORY>                                    146,258
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               277,491
<PP&E>                                          60,005
<DEPRECIATION>                                  15,042
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 450,792
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          206,034
<BONDS>                                        162,225
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           11,353
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            51
<OTHER-SE>                                      16,851
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   450,792
<SALES>                                        239,392
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               239,392
<CGS>                                          181,343
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  236,731
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (398)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,112
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (2,053)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (860)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1,193)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,193)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.23)


</TABLE>
Paula Nurthen 

From: Danita Alberico 

Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2017 5:14 PM 

To: Commissioners Office 

Cc: Commission Secretary Office; Erin Chlopak; Lorenzo Holloway; Patricia Orrock; Thomas 

Hintermister; Erica Lee; Rickida Morcomb; Paula Nurthen 

Subject: Request for Consideration of a Legal Question from Kelly for Congress 

Attachments: Kelly for Congress - Legal Question Request (LRA 1056).pdf 

Commissioners, 

The Office of General Counsel and Kelly for Congress (the "Committee") have resolved the Committee's Request 

for Consideradbn of Legal Questions, filed November 8,2017, through the informal resolution process specified in 

the Program for Requesting Consideration of Legal Questions by the Commission. 81 Fed. Reg. 29861 (May. 13, 

2016). The Office of General Counsel and the Office of Compliance agree that the Committee has demonstrated 

that its donors provided the Committee with information regarding how a contribution should be attributed and 

affirming the donor's eligibility to make the contribudon. Thus, the request for review process in this matter has 

concluded. 

If you have any quesdons or concems, please let us know. 

Danita Alherico 

Attorney, Compliance Advice 

Policq Division, Office of General Counsel 

Federal Election Commission 

(202)694-1608
§ 160.528 Motions. ( a ) An application to the ALJ for an order or ruling must be by motion. Motions must state the relief sought, the authority relied upon and the facts alleged, and must be filed with the ALJ and served on all other parties.
( b ) Except for motions made during a prehearing conference or at the hearing, all motions must be in writing. The ALJ may require that oral motions be reduced to writing.
( c ) Within 10 days after a written motion is served, or such other time as may be fixed by the ALJ, any party may file a response to the motion.
( d ) The ALJ may not grant a written motion before the time for filing responses has expired, except upon consent of the parties or following a hearing on the motion, but may overrule or deny the motion without awaiting a response.
( e ) The ALJ must make a reasonable effort to dispose of all outstanding motions before the beginning of the hearing.
§ 16.17 Ex parte communications (communications outside the record). ( a ) A party shall not communicate with a Board or staff member about matters involved in an appeal without notice to the other party. If such communication occurs, the Board will disclose it to the other party and make it part of the record after the other party has an opportunity to comment. Board members and staff shall not consider any information outside the record (see § 16.21 for what the record consists of) about matters involved in an appeal.
( b ) The above does not apply to the following: Communications among Board members and staff; communications concerning the Board's administrative functions or procedures; requests from the Board to a party for a document (although the material submitted in response also must be given to the other party); and material which the Board includes in the record after notice and an opportunity to comment.
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 216 (Wednesday, November 8, 2006)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 65446]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9109]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service

36 CFR Chapter 1


Negotiated Rulemaking Advisory Committee for Dog Management at 
Golden Gate National Recreation Area

ACTION: Notice of meeting cancellation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Notice is hereby given, in accordance with the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 86 Stat. 770, 5 U.S.C. App. 1, section 
10), of cancellation of the Wednesday, November 8, 2006 meeting of the 
Negotiated Rulemaking Advisory Committee for Dog Management at Golden 
Gate National Recreation Area (GGNRA) beginning at 3 p.m. in the 
Conference Center at Fort Mason Center in San Francisco which was 
published in the Federal Register on Wednesday, October 11, 2006, 71 FR 
59697.
    The meeting is cancelled due to a change in schedule of the 
Negotiated Rulemaking Advisory Committee and will be rescheduled.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Go to the 
www.parkplanning.nps.gov.goga and select Negotiated Rulemaking for Dog 
Management at GGNRA or call the project information line at 415-561-
4728.

    Dated: October 31, 2006.
Bernard C. Fagan,
Acting Chief, Office of Policy.
[FR Doc. 06-9109 Filed 11-7-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312-FN-M
CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Victory Divide Mining Company (the
      "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with
      the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Shaocheng Xu,
      Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Date:
                March 31, 2008
            By:
            /s/
                SHAOCHENG XUShaocheng
              XuChief
              Financial Officer
IIA 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. J. RES. 55 

Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed foreign military sale 

to the Government of Egypt of certain defense articles and services. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 22, 2024 

Mr. PAUL introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed foreign military sale to the Government of Egypt of certain 

defense articles and services. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That the following proposed foreign military sale to the 

4 Government of Egypt is prohibited: 

5 (1) The sale of the following defense articles 

6 and services, described in Transmittal No. 22–58, 

7 submitted to Congress pursuant to section 36(b)(1) 

8 of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 

9 2776(b)(1)), and published in the Congressional 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•SJ 55 IS 

1 Record on January 10, 2024: 28-Meter Patrol Craft 

2 Kits and related equipment. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
#### § 12a.11 Unsuitable properties.

The landholding agency will defer, for 20 days after the date that notice of a property is published in the Federal Register, action to dispose of properties determined unsuitable for homeless assistance. HUD will inform landholding agencies or GSA if appeal of an unsuitability determination is filed by a representative of the homeless pursuant to § 12a.4(f)(4). HUD will advise the agency that it should refrain from initiating disposal procedures until HUD has completed its reconsideration process regarding unsuitability. Thereafter, or if no appeal has been filed after 20 days, GSA or the appropriate landholding agency may proceed with disposal action in accordance with applicable law.