alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          10,164
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   96,142
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (3,124)
<INVENTORY>                                     65,452
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               181,496
<PP&E>                                         213,982
<DEPRECIATION>                                (90,311)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 361,123
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          110,287
<BONDS>                                        196,916
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           36,993
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                   (245,484)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   361,123
<SALES>                                        178,437
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               178,437
<CGS>                                          129,471
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  129,471
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   790
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,353
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,675)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       497
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,178)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,178)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (3.98)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (3.98)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of RTI International Metals, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Timothy G. Rupert, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

August 13, 2003

/s/ TIMOTHY G. RUPERT
---------------------------------------------------------
Timothy G. Rupert
Chief Executive Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

          - [File No. 500-1] 

It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of Digital Gas, Inc. (“Digital”), because of questions raised regarding the accuracy and adequacy of publicly disseminated information concerning, among other things, Digital's announced agreement with Techno Rubber, Inc. and Digital's assets. 

The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the securities of the above-listed company. 

*Therefore, it is ordered,*                     pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the above-listed company is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. EST, November 17, 2006, through 11:59 p.m. EST, on December 4, 2006.                 

By the Commission.

Nancy M. Morris,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 06-9332 Filed 11-17-06; 11:31 am] 

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
§ 153.210 State establishment of a reinsurance program. ( a ) *General requirement.* Each State is eligible to establish a reinsurance program for the years 2014 through 2016. ( 1 ) If a State establishes a reinsurance program, the State must enter into a contract with one or more applicable reinsurance entities to carry out the provisions of this subpart.
( 2 ) If a State contracts with or establishes more than one applicable reinsurance entity, the State must ensure that each applicable reinsurance entity operates in a distinct geographic area with no overlap of jurisdiction with any other applicable reinsurance entity.
( 3 ) A State may permit an applicable reinsurance entity to subcontract specific administrative functions required under this subpart and subpart E of this part.
( 4 ) A State must review and approve subcontracting arrangements to ensure efficient and appropriate expenditures of administrative funds collected under this subpart.
( 5 ) A State must ensure that the applicable reinsurance entity completes all reinsurance-related activities for benefit years 2014 through 2016 and any activities required to be undertaken in subsequent periods.
( b ) *Multi-State reinsurance arrangements.* Multiple States may contract with a single entity to serve as an applicable reinsurance entity for each State. In such a case, the reinsurance programs for those States must be operated as separate programs.
( c ) *Non-electing States.* HHS will establish a reinsurance program for each State that does not elect to establish its own reinsurance program.
( d ) *Oversight.* Each State that establishes a reinsurance program must ensure that the applicable reinsurance entity complies with all provisions of this subpart and subpart E of this part throughout the duration of its contract.
( e ) *Reporting to HHS.* Each State that establishes a reinsurance program must ensure that each applicable reinsurance entity provides information regarding requests for reinsurance payments under the national contribution rate made under § 153.410 for all reinsurance-eligible plans for each quarter during the applicable benefit year in a manner and timeframe established by HHS.
[77 FR 17245, Mar. 23, 2012, as amended at 78 FR 15525, Mar. 11, 2013]
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
(Chief Executive Officer) CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER I, J.S.B. Jenkins, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Tandy Brands
Accessories, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have:  a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report
our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc.
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):  a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; andb.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting. Date: September 23, 2004
    
    /s/ J.S.B. Jenkins
J.S.B. Jenkins
Chief Executive Officer
If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports.

- 1

- 

### S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N

C O U R T O F A P P E A L S

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee, UNPUBLISHED September 2, 2021

v No. 352328
Oakland Circuit Court

CHRISTOPHER JOSEPH BERAK, LC No. 2018

- 266276

- FC

Defendant

- Appellant.

Before: L ETICA

, P .J., and S ERVITTO and M. J. K ELLY , JJ.

L ETICA

, P.J. ( concurring ).

I agree with the majority except as to its suggestion that the prosecution was required to
call another witness in place of Deputy Overall’s son to identify Deputy Overall as the peace officer who was killed

. To the contrary, “ [t] here is no rule requiring the prosecution to use only
the least prejudicial evidence per se to establish facts at issue.” People v Fishe r , 449 Mich 441, 452; 537 NW2d 577 (1995). A nd a party , including a prosecutor, “ ‘ is entitled to hit as hard as he

can above, but not below, the belt. ’ ” People v Vasher , 449 Mich 494, 501; 537 NW2d 168 (1995), quoting State v Rollo , 221 Or 428, 438; 351 P2d 422 (1960). Although the prosecutor’s open

ended question to the deceased’s adult son about “ briefly” describing his father was not laser

focused on the elements of the charged offense s , there was no objection and defendant has not shown plain error occurred in light of the trial court’s instruction that the jury not base its decision on sympathy

— an instruction the jury is presumed to have followed

. People v Unger , 278 Mich App 210, 237; 749 NW2d 272 (2008) ; People v Watson , 245 Mich App 572, 586, 591

- 592; 629 NW2d 411 (2001)

. Indeed, i t is hardly surprising that a son look s up to his father or that a long

time public servant like Deputy Overall wanted to help people in their time of need and assist them with solving their problems. Moreover, t he record does not reflect an emotional breakdown or outburst from Deputy Overall’s son that had the potential to prejudice defendant’s right to a fair

trial. Instead, Deputy Overall’s son’s testimony was brief

. It included the admission of an in

- life photograph and rele vant testimony that Deputy Overall was on

- duty and died from his injuries. MRE 401; People v Browning , 106 Mich App 516, 523

- 524; 308 NW2d 264 (1981); People v
Sullivan , 97 Mich App 488, 492; 296 NW2d 81 (1980). It consumed just twelve pages in a trial- 2

-

that lasted ten days with the parties largely battl ing over defendant’s intent and premeditation

. H ow Deputy Overall’s brutal, bloody death played out in real life was certainly compelling , but
th e prosecut ion was not required to sanitize it by calling a less gripping witness than h is son to testify. Fisher , 449 Mich at 452.

/s/ Anica Letica
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                             199
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   27,685
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,181
<INVENTORY>                                     42,392
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                73,670
<PP&E>                                           8,559
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,495
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  86,745
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           32,156
<BONDS>                                         86,100
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           45,971
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            12
<OTHER-SE>                                    (77,812)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    86,745
<SALES>                                         55,998
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                           37,682
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   40,157
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   156
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,396
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,614
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,374
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,240
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of the Accounting of Jacob Voelbel, as Executor of Nicolaus Joost, Deceased, Respondent. Anna L. Raff, Appellant.

*Matter of Voelbel,*126 App. Div. 982, affirmed.

(Submitted January 5, 1909;

decided January 26, 1909.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of he' Supreme Court in the second judicial department, ntered May 1, 1908, which affirmed a decree of the Kings *548County Surrogate’s Court settling the accounts of the executor herein. •

*Frank C. Avery*for appellant.

*John H. Steenwerth*for respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Edward T. Bartlett, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock and Chase, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Prosperity Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period
ending June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David Zalman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
operating results of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ David Zalman       
|David Zalman           
|Chief Executive Officer
|August 10, 2009
###### Editorial Note on Part 1303

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1303 appear at 89 FR 67816, Aug. 21, 2024.

#### § 1303.3 Other requirements.

The following chart includes HHS regulations that apply to all grants made under the Act:

| Cite | Title |
| --- | --- |
| 45 CFR part 16 | Department grant appeals process. |
| 45 CFR part 30 | HHS Standards and Procedures for Claims collection. |
| 45 CFR part 46 | Protection of human subjects. |
| 45 CFR part 75 | Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. |
| 45 CFR part 80 | Nondiscrimination under programs receiving federal assistance through the Department of Health and Human Services—Effectuation of title VI and VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. |
| 45 CFR part 81 | Practice and procedure for hearings under part 80. |
| 45 CFR part 84 | Nondiscrimination on the basis of handicap in federally assisted programs. |
| 45 CFR part 87 | Equal treatment for faith based organizations. |
| 2 CFR part 170 | FFATA Sub-award and executive compensation. |
| 2 CFR 25.110 | CCR/DUNS requirement. |
#### Barnes, appellant, v. Barrus.

*Promissory note—indorser*— *notice.*

The indorser oí a promissory note received this notice: “ The note given to Sarah E. Barnes by George B. Hutchins for $100, dated the 34th day of May, 1866, is this day due; that if the note is not paid by Hutchins, she (Mrs. Barnes) will hold you for the note.” *Held,*not sufficient to charge the indorser.

Appeal from a judgment for defendant on the report of a referee. The facts appear in the opinion.

*W. A. Poucher,*for appellant.

*A. jE. Willey,*for respondent.

Talcott, J.

This action is brought to charge the defendant as the indorser of a promissory note for $100, made by one George B. Hutchins. The notice claimed to have been given to the indorser, and as found by the referee, is as follows:

> “ The note given to Sarah E. Barnes by George B. Hutchins for $100, dated the 24th day of May, 1866, is this day due; that, if the note is not paid by Hutchins, she (Mrs. Barnes) will .hold you for the note.

> (Signed)

> B. N. Hinman.”

Sundry objections are made to the form of this notice, and to its sufficiency. It is sufficient, however, to say that it contains no intimation that the note had been presented for payment and dishonored. The most latitudinarian doctrines on the subject of the sufficiency of notice of dishonor to charge an indorser will not excuse the omission of the information in some form, that the note has been presented for payment and payment has been refused. This information is the very gist and obj ect of the notice. The referee was, therefore, right in holding that the notice was insufficient to charge the defendant as indorser, and the judgment is affirmed.

*Judgment affirmed.*
§ 2.30 Misappropriation of property and services. ( a ) The following are prohibited: ( 1 ) Obtaining or exercising unlawful possession over the property of another with the purpose to deprive the owner of the property.
( 2 ) Obtaining property or services offered for sale or compensation without making payment or offering to pay.
( 3 ) Obtaining property or services offered for sale or compensation by means of deception or a statement of past, present or future fact that is instrumental in causing the wrongful transfer of property or services, or using stolen, forged, expired revoked or fraudulently obtained credit cards or paying with negotiable paper on which payment is refused.
( 4 ) Concealing unpurchased merchandise on or about the person without the knowledge or consent of the seller or paying less than purchase price by deception.
( 5 ) Acquiring or possessing the property of another, with knowledge or reason to believe that the property is stolen.
( b ) The regulations contained in this section apply, regardless of land ownership, on all lands and waters within a park area that are under the legislative jurisdiction of the United States.
[48 FR 30282, June 30, 1983, as amended at 52 FR 35240, Sept. 18, 1987]
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20463

 

 July 28, 2022

MEMORANDUM

TO: Patricia C. Orrock

 Chief Compliance Officer

 Dayna C. Brown

 Assistant Staff Director

 Audit Division

FROM: Neven F. Stipanovic 

 Associate General Counsel

Policy Division

 Jessica Selinkoff

 Acting Assistant General Counsel

 Compliance Advice 

 Joshua Blume 

 Attorney 

 

SUBJECT: Interim Audit Report on Steve Daines for Montana (LRA 1146) 

 The Office of the General Counsel has reviewed the proposed Interim Audit Report 

(“IAR”) on Steve Daines for Montana (the “Committee”). The IAR contains three findings: 

Receipt of Contributions in Excess of the Limit (Finding 1); Disclosure of Debts and 

Obligations (Finding 2), and Disclosure of Receipts (Finding 3). We concur with the findings. 

If you have any questions, please contact Joshua Blume, the attorney assigned to this audit.
<PAGE>   1


                                   EXHIBIT 11


               AMERICAN NATIONAL FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                        COMPUTATION OF BASIC AND DILUTED
                               EARNINGS PER SHARE
                      (In thousands, except per share data)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                        Three months ended    Nine months ended
                                          September 30,         September 30,
                                        ------------------    -----------------
                                         1999       1998       1999       1998
                                        ------     ------     ------     ------
<S>                                     <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>
Net earnings, basic basis ..........    $  743     $1,390     $6,186     $4,476
                                        ======     ======     ======     ======
Weighted average basic shares ......     7,150      2,835      6,773      2,890
                                        ------     ------     ------     ------
Basic earnings per share ...........    $  .10     $  .49     $  .91     $ 1.55
                                        ======     ======     ======     ======

Diluted net earning, basic basis ...    $  743     $1,390     $6,186     $4,476
                                        ======     ======     ======     ======
Weighted average shares outstanding
during the period, basic basis .....     7,150      2,835      6,773      2,890

Effect of dilutive options .........        --        288         44        288
                                        ------     ------     ------     ------
Weighted average shares outstanding
during the period, diluted basis ...     7,150      3,123      6,817      3,178
                                        ======     ======     ======     ======

Diluted earnings per share .........    $  .10     $  .45     $  .91     $ 1.41
                                        ======     ======     ======     ======
</TABLE>



                                       12
#### § 164.302 Applicability.

A covered entity or business associate must comply with the applicable standards, implementation specifications, and requirements of this subpart with respect to electronic protected health information of a covered entity.

[78 FR 5693, Jan. 25, 2013]