alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### SERVED: October21, 2013
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

, WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF ABO SUPPLY LLC FAA DOCKETNO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Action) FDMS NO. FAA 2013-0713
NOTICE IraLeibowitz, Attorney-Advisor retired on September30, 2013. All future communications shouldbe directed to the undersigned at: Richard C. Goodwin, U.S. Administrative Law Judge Office ofHearings, Attn: Room E11-310 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200NewJersey, S.E. Washington, D.C. 20590 (Richard.Goodwin@dot.gov) Administrative matters should be directed to Patricia Matthews, StaffAssistant (202) 366-5121 (Patricia.Matthews@dot.gov)

Richard C. Goodwin U.S. Administrative Law Judge Attachment

- Service ListSERVICE LIST ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

### Federal AviationAdministration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 1



### Scott L. 

### Johnston, Respondent's Counsel 

### Givens & Johnston, PLLC 950 Echo Lane, Suite 360 Houston, TX 77024-2788 TEL: 713-932-1540 FAX: 713-932-1542 WATTS: 800-285-8042 ONE COPY



### EMAIL: sjohnston@givensjohnston.com James Archier, Complainant's Counsel 

### Attorney, Office ofthe· Regional Counsel Southwest Region, ASW-7 Federal Aviation Administration 2601 Meacham Blvd., Suite 679 Fort Worth, TX 7613'7 TEL: 817-222-5074 FAX: 817-222-5945/5092 The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin,Administrative LawJudge 

### Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-5121 Legal Assistant FAX: 202-366-7536 FDMS Nos. FAA-2013-0713 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WIOOO, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.

2
June 9, 2015 

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

BENJAMIN K. SANCHEZ, Appellant 

NO. 14-13-00272-CV V.

DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, AS TRUSTEE FOR 

SOUNDVIEW HOME LOAN TRUST 2006-OPT4, ASSET-BACKED 

CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006-OPT4, HOMEWARD RESIDENTIAL, INC. 

F/K/A AMERICAN HOME MORTGAGE SERVICING, INC., AND REAL 

TIME RESOLUTIONS, INC., Appellees 

________________________________ 

 This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellees, Deutsche 

Bank National Trust Company, as Trustee for Soundview Home Loan Trust 2006-

OPT4, Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2006-OPT4, Homeward Residential, Inc. 

f/k/a American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc., and Real Time Resolutions, Inc., 

signed, January 8, 2013, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have 

inspected the record and find no error in the judgment. We order the judgment of 

the court below AFFIRMED. 

 We further order this decision certified below for observance.
1

Sutton, Tia

From: Grant, Andrea <Andrea.Grant@dlapiper.com>

Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2015 12:25 PM

To: Sutton, Tia

Subject: Proposed Amendment to 40 CFR Sections 80.510 and 80.511 regarding sale of non-ECA 

fuel

Attachments: 89517309_1.docx; ATT00001.txt

Follow Up Flag: Follow up

Flag Status: Flagged

Tia, 

Attached for your consideration are two (almost identical) amendments to Sections 80.510 and 

80.511, respectively. They are intended to authorize the sale of non-ECA fuel to vessels operating in

an ECA or ECA associated area if such vessels have received authority from the U.S. Government to 

burn fuel with a sulfur content that exceeds 1000 ppm. 

Hope these meet with your approval. 

Please do not hesitate to call me if you have any questions, either on my office number (202) 799-

4306 or my cell (202) 538-0760. 

Thank you very much for the opportunity to propose these amendments. 

All the best, 

Andrea 

Andrea Grant

Partner 

T +1 202.799.4306 

F +1 202.799.5306 

M +1 202.538.0760 

E andrea.grant@dlapiper.com 

DLA Piper LLP (US)

500 Eighth Street, NW 

Washington, DC 20004 

United States 

www.dlapiper.com 
EAST\89517309.1 

Proposed Amendments to 40 CFR Sections 80.510 amd 80.511 

The following language would authorize the sale by refiners, importers, and downstream 

entities of non-ECA fuel to Category 3 vessels, operating in an ECA or an ECA 

associated area, that have received temporary or permanent authority to burn higher 

sulfur fuel during the period in which the vessels are being retrofitted. 

Section 80.510 

(l) The per-gallon sulfur standard in paragraph (k) of this section shall not apply to sales 

of diesel, distillate, or residual fuel used by vessels allowed by the U.S. government 

pursuant to MARPOL Annex VI Regulation 3 or Regulation 4 to exceed the fuel sulfur 

limits in an ECA or an ECA associated area. 

Section 80.511 

(c) The per-gallon sulfur standard of Section 80.510(k) shall not apply to sales of diesel, 

distillate, or residual fuel used by vessels allowed by the U.S. government pursuant to 

MARPOL Annex VI Regulation 3 or Regulation 4 to exceed the fuel sulfur limits in an 

ECA or an ECA associated area.
# ®T G

1770 Commerce Park Drive El Paso, Texas 79912 (915) 877-4380 

## PSI

" t, . II i W PRODUc S, INC. A SLI Inc. Company

April 6, 2000 US Department of Energy Attn: Brenda Edwards-Jones Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy EE-41 1000 Independence Ave, S W Washington, DC 20585-0212 RE: Docket No. EE-RM-97-500 Public Hearing ; Fluorescent Lamp Ballasts
Dear Ms Ewards-Jones: Below is a statement from Power Lighting Products for the April 18, 2000 Public Hearing on Fluorescent Lamp Ballasts. If you need more information, I can be reached at 915-877-1464 (phone) or 915-877-1640 (fax).


### Power Lighting Products, Statement for the April 18, 2000 DOE Public Hearing I am Thomas Schooler representing Power Lighting Products, also known as Sli

-Lighting, and a member of the National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA). Power Lighting Products believes that the current Proposed Ballast Rule satisfies all of the legal requirements and adequately addresses all of the stakeholders concerns. PLP supports the comments of the Ballast Section of NEMA by Norm Grimshaw and also supports the Proposed Ballast Rule submitted by the Joint Stakeholders and outlined by the DOE in the March 15, 2000 Federal Register Notice. Therefore, Power Lighting Products requests the Department of Energy to adopt this Proposed Rule as the Final Rule.

Thomas R. Schooler Product Introduction Manager file: 000406TS

1 

# LIGHTING 1770 CommerceParkDrive EIPaso, Texas 79912 (915) 877-4380

US Department ofEnergy Attn: BrendaEdwards-Jones Office ofEnergy Efficiency and Renewable Energy EE-41 1000 Independence Ave, S W Washington, DC 20585-0212 

# 1bGG**PY.WE~** PRODUCTS, INC. A SLiInc. Company
April 6, 2000

RE: DocketNo. EE-RM-97-500 Public Hearing; Fluorescent Lamp Ballasts
Dear Ms Ewards-Jones: Below is a statement from Power Lighting Products for the April 18, 2000 Public Hearing on Fluorescent Lamp Ballasts. Ifyou need more information, I can be reached at 915-877-1464 (phone) or 915-877-1640 (fax).


### PowerLighting Products, Statementfor the April 18, 2000 

### DOE Public Hearing
I am Thomas Schooler representing Power Lighting Products, also known as Sli-Lighting, and a member oftheNational Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA). Power Lighting Products believes that the current Proposed Ballast Rule satisfies all of the legal requirements and adequately addresses all ofthe stakeholders concerns. PLP supports the comments of the Ballast Section of NEMA by Norm Grimshaw and also supports the Proposed Ballast Rule submitted by the Joint Stakeholders and outlined by the DOE in the March 15, 2000 Federal Register Notice. Therefore, Power Lighting Products requests the Department ofEnergy to adopt this Proposed Rule as the Final Rule.

Thomas R. Schooler Product IntroductionManager file: 000406TS
§ 1603.1 Scope, purpose, and applicability. ( a ) This part sets forth rules to be followed when a litigant requests an employee of the Legal Services Corporation (LSC), including LSC's Office of the Inspector General (OIG), to provide testimony in a deposition, trial, or other similar proceeding concerning information acquired in the course of performing official duties or because of such person's official capacity with LSC. This part also sets forth procedures for the handling of subpoenas for documents and other requests for documents in the possession of LSC or the OIG, and for the processing of requests for certification of copies of documents.
( b ) It is LSC's policy to provide information, data, and records to non-federal litigants to the same extent and in the same manner that they are made available to the public. When subject to the jurisdiction of a court or other tribunal presiding over litigation between non-federal parties, LSC will follow all applicable procedural and substantive rules relating to the production of information, data, and records by a non-party. The availability of LSC employees to testify in litigation not involving federal parties is governed by LSC's policy to maintain strict impartiality with respect to private litigants and to minimize the disruption of official duties.
( c ) This part applies to state, local, and tribal judicial, administrative, and legislative proceedings, and to federal judicial and administrative proceedings.
( d ) This part does not apply to: ( 1 ) Any civil or criminal proceedings to which LSC is a party.
( 2 ) Congressional requests or subpoenas for testimony or documents.
( 3 ) Consultative services and technical assistance provided by LSC in carrying out its normal program activities.
( 4 ) Employees serving as expert witnesses in connection with professional and consultative services as approved outside activities. In cases where employees are providing such outside services, they must state for the record that the testimony represents their own views and does not necessarily represent the official position of LSC.
( 5 ) Employees making appearances in their private capacity in legal or administrative proceedings that do not relate to LSC, such as cases arising out of traffic accidents, crimes, domestic relations, etc., and not involving professional and consultative services.
( 6 ) Any civil or criminal proceedings in State court brought on behalf of LSC.
( 7 ) Any criminal proceeding brought as a result of a referral for prosecution by the OIG or by any other Inspector General in connection with a case worked jointly with the OIG.
**Exhibit 12(b)**

CERTIFICATION

I, W.Peter Day, certify that:

1.               I havereviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Amcor Limited;

2.               Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.               Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of,and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.               Thecompany’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15(d)-15(e)) for the company and have:

(a)                                  Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;

(b)                                 (Intentionally omitted as Amcor Limitedis not yet required to comply with S404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002);

(c)                                  Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

(d)                                 Disclosedin this report any change in the company’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the period covered by this report that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and

5.               Thecompany’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’sauditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors:

(c)                                  Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

(d)                                 Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the company’s internal control over financialreporting

Date:January 15, 2007
|        |   /s/ W. Peter Day                            |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   Name: W. Peter Day                          |
|   |   Title: Executive General Manager,   Finance |

 

----
§ 1703.102 Definitions. In this part: ( a ) *Meeting* means the deliberations of a majority of the Commission members who have been appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate where such deliberations determine or result in the joint conduct of official Commission business.
( b ) *Member* means one of the Commissioners of the National Commission on Libraries and Information Science (NCLIS) who is appointed to that position by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate.
Case 4:08-cv-00324-RH-WCS Document 153 Filed 12/30/09 Page 1 of 13Case 4:08-cv-00324-RH-WCS Document 153 Filed 12/30/09 Page 2 of 13Case 4:08-cv-00324-RH-WCS Document 153 Filed 12/30/09 Page 3 of 13Case 4:08-cv-00324-RH-WCS Document 153 Filed 12/30/09 Page 4 of 13Case 4:08-cv-00324-RH-WCS Document 153 Filed 12/30/09 Page 5 of 13Case 4:08-cv-00324-RH-WCS Document 153 Filed 12/30/09 Page 6 of 13Case 4:08-cv-00324-RH-WCS Document 153 Filed 12/30/09 Page 7 of 13Case 4:08-cv-00324-RH-WCS Document 153 Filed 12/30/09 Page 8 of 13Case 4:08-cv-00324-RH-WCS Document 153 Filed 12/30/09 Page 9 of 13Case 4:08-cv-00324-RH-WCS Document 153 Filed 12/30/09 Page 10 of 13Case 4:08-cv-00324-RH-WCS Document 153 Filed 12/30/09 Page 11 of 13Case 4:08-cv-00324-RH-WCS Document 153 Filed 12/30/09 Page 12 of 13Case 4:08-cv-00324-RH-WCS Document 153 Filed 12/30/09 Page 13 of 13
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

I, Kung-Chieh Huang, Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer) of
Eupa International Corporation (the "Registrant"), certifies that to the best of
my knowledge, based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the
period ended March 31, 2003 of the Registrant (the "Report"):

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.

/s/  Kung-Chieh Huang
---------------------------------
Name: Kung-Chieh Huang
Date: April 7, 2004
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 25 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 25

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
 United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Labor 
 relating to ``Adverse Effect Wage Rate Methodology for the Temporary 
Employment of H-2A Nonimmigrants in Non-Range Occupations in the United 
                               States''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 25, 2023

  Mr. Scott of South Carolina (for himself, Mr. Budd, Mr. Tillis, Mr. 
Graham, Mr. Wicker, Mr. Cramer, Mr. Boozman, Mr. Crapo, Mr. Risch, Mr. 
 Ricketts, Mr. Marshall, Mr. Cassidy, Mrs. Hyde-Smith, Ms. Lummis, Mr. 
 Lankford, Mr. Braun, Mr. Scott of Florida, Mrs. Fischer, Mr. Kennedy, 
 Ms. Ernst, Mr. Barrasso, Mr. Hagerty, Mrs. Blackburn, Mrs. Britt, Mr. 
 Tuberville, Mr. Hoeven, Mr. McConnell, and Mr. Moran) introduced the 
 following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
 United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Labor 
 relating to ``Adverse Effect Wage Rate Methodology for the Temporary 
Employment of H-2A Nonimmigrants in Non-Range Occupations in the United 
                               States''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
final rule submitted by the Employment and Training Administration of 
the Department of Labor relating to ``Adverse Effect Wage Rate 
Methodology for the Temporary Employment of H-2A Nonimmigrants in Non-
Range Occupations in the United States'' (88 Fed. Reg. 12760 (February 
28, 2023)), and such rule shall have no force or effect.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 1177.6 Subdivision of claims not authorized.

NEH will not subdivide debts in order to avoid the monetary ceiling established by 31 U.S.C. 3711(a)(2). NEH will consider a debtor's liability arising from a particular transaction or contract as a single debt in determining whether the debt is one of less than $100,000 (excluding interest, penalties, and administrative costs) or such higher amount as the Attorney General shall from time to time prescribe for purposes of compromising, suspending, or terminating collection activity.
§ 902.74 Agency decision. ( a ) The Chairman shall have sole authority to act on an appeal, which seeks to reverse an initial decision denying disclosure of a record. He shall review each appeal and provide the appellant and other interested parties with a written notice of his decision. The decision of the Chairman as to the availability of the record is administratively final.
( b ) If the decision of the Chairman sustains the refusal to disclose, the notice of decision shall set forth the reasons for the refusal, including the specific exemptions from disclosure under the Act that are the bases of the decision not to disclose. The notice shall further advise the appellant that judicial review is available on complaint to the appropriate District Court of the United States, as provided in section 552(a)(4)(B) of title 5 U.S.C.
( c ) As set out in § 902.61, the final decision on appeal shall be made within 20 workdays after the receipt of the appeal. An extension of this limitation is authorized as prescribed under § 902.62.
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

--------------------------------------------------------------------- x

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: 

x

21-cv-6095 (ALC) (SDA)

ORDER ADOPTING 

REPORT AND 

RECOMMENDATION 

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION,

Plaintiff,

-againstLATPAC and CHALIN M. ASKEW, 

Defendants.

---------------------------------------------------------------------

ANDREW L. CARTER, JR., District Judge:

On November 4, 2021, this matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Stewart 

D. Aaron for general pretrial matters. ECF No. 19. On January 6, 2022, I issued an amended Order

of Reference, referring Plaintiff Federal Election Commission’s (“Commission”) motion for 

default judgment. ECF No. 22. The Court now considers the Report and Recommendation issued 

by Magistrate Judge Aaron, recommending that Plaintiff’s motion be granted. ECF No. 42. 

Despite notification of the right to object to the Report and Recommendation, no objections 

were filed. Where no timely objections are made, the Court may adopt the Report and 

Recommendation as long as there is no clear error on the face of the record. Sacks v. Gandhi Eng’g, 

Inc., 999 F. Supp. 2d 629, 632 (S.D.N.Y. 2014) (citing Wilds v. United Parcel Serv., 262 F.Supp.2d 

163, 169 (S.D.N.Y. 2003)). In light of the lack of any objections to the Report and 

Recommendation and the fact that Court finds no clear error in the record, the Court adopts the 

Report and Recommendation in its entirety. 

Therefore, I award the following relief: 

1. Civil penalty against Defendants in the amount of $56,400;

5/6/22

Case 1:21-cv-06095-ALC-SDA Document 43 Filed 05/06/22 Page 1 of 2
2

2. Declaration that LatPAC and Defendant Askew in his official capacity as LatPAC’s

treasurer violated 52 U.S.C. § 30104(a) and (b) by failing to file LatPAC’s disclosure

reports and failing to disclose LatPAC’s receipts, disbursements and debts;

3. Order that LatPAC and Askew file all overdue reports and disclose all information to the

Commission as required by the Federal Election Campaign Act and Commission

regulations;

4. Permanent Injunction prohibiting LatPAC and Askew from failing to file required

disclosure reports.

The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to enter judgment, terminate the motion at ECF

No. 26, and close this case. 

SO ORDERED. 

Dated: May 6, 2022 

New York, New York 

____________________________________ 

ANDREW L. CARTER, JR. 

United States District Judge

Case 1:21-cv-06095-ALC-SDA Document 43 Filed 05/06/22 Page 2 of 2
# THE STATE OF TEXAS

M A N D A T E

*********************************************

TO THE 7TH DISTRICT COURT OF SMITH COUNT Y, GREETING:

Before our Court of Appeals for the 12th Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 25th
day of Nov ember, 2014 , the caus e upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

NICKY CHARUNE AGNEW , Appellant

NO. 12

- 13

- 00181

- CR; Trial Court No. 007

- 1194

- 11

Opinion by Brian Hoyle, Justice.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

was determined; and therein our said Court made its o rder in these words:

“ THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record and briefs filed herein, and the same being considered, it is the opinion of this court that there was no error in the judgment.

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED tha t the judgment of the court

below be in all things affirmed , and that this decision be certified to the court below for

observance. ”

WHEREAS, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District of Tex as in this behalf, and in all things have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS, THE HONORABLE JAMES T. WORTHEN , Chief Justice of our Court of Appeals for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District, with the Seal thereof affixed, at the City of Tyle r, this the 8 th day of June , 201 5

.

CATHY S. LUSK, CLERK

By:

_______________________________ Chief Deputy Clerk