alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF NANCY ERICKSON, 

SECRETARY OF THE SENATE

By Michelle Haynes, Executive Clerk

ONE HUNDRED TENTH CONGRESS 

Wednesday, March 14, 2007

FIRST SESSION {

SECOND SESSION {

Issue No. 30

CONVENED JANUARY 4, 2007

RESOLUTIONS

CALENDAR 

NO.

S. RES. 

NO.

SUBJECT REPORTED 

BY

1

 
TREATIES

CALENDAR 

NO.

TREATY

DOC. NO.

SUBJECT REPORTED 

BY

2

 
* Signifies nominee’s commitment to respond to requests to appear and testify before any duly constituted committee of the Senate 

NOMINATIONS

CALENDAR 

NO.

MESSAGE

NO.

NOMINEE, OFFICE, AND PREDECESSOR REPORTED 

BY

3

THE JUDICIARY 

36 4 John Preston Bailey, of West Virginia, to be 

United States District Judge for the Northern 

District of West Virginia, vice Frederick P. 

Stamp, Jr., retired. 

Mar 01, 2007 Reported by Mr. 

Leahy, Committee on the 

Judiciary, without printed 

report. 

37 32 Otis D. Wright II, of California, to be United 

States District Judge for the Central District of 

California, vice Gary L. Taylor, retired. 

Mar 01, 2007 Reported by Mr. 

Leahy, Committee on the 

Judiciary, without printed 

report. 

38 33 George H. Wu, of California, to be United States 

District Judge for the Central District of 

California, vice Ronald S. W. Lew, retired. 

Mar 01, 2007 Reported by Mr. 

Leahy, Committee on the 

Judiciary, without printed 

report. 

42 8 Thomas M. Hardiman, of Pennsylvania, to be 

United States Circuit Judge for the Third 

Circuit, vice Richard L. Nygaard, retired. 

Mar 08, 2007 Reported by Mr. 

Leahy, Committee on the 

Judiciary, without printed 

report. 

43 6 Vanessa Lynne Bryant, of Connecticut, to be 

United States District Judge for the District of 

Connecticut, vice Dominic J. Squatrito, retired. 

Mar 08, 2007 Reported by Mr. 

Leahy, Committee on the 

Judiciary, without printed 

report. 
NOMINATIONS PLACED ON THE SECRETARY’S DESK

4
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      AMENDED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (a) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (b) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company                as of and for the period covered by the                Report. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:    | /s/Evgeny                Bagay                              |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Name:                  Evgeny Bagay                         |
|   | Title:                    Chief Executive Officer |

----
RESOLUTIONS

CALENDAR 

NO

S. RES 

NO

SUBJECT REPORTED 

BY

1

 
TREATIES

CALENDAR 

NO

TREATY

DOC NO

SUBJECT REPORTED 

BY

2

 
* Signifies nominee’s commitment to respond to requests to appear and testify before any duly constituted committee of the Senate 

NOMINATIONS

CALENDAR 

NO

MESSAGE

NO

NOMINEE, OFFICE, AND PREDECESSOR REPORTED 

BY

3

ARMY 

44 212 The following named officer for appointment as 

the Chief of Engineers/Commanding General, 

United States Army Corps of Engineers, and 

appointment to the grade indicated in the 

United States Army, while assigned to a 

position of importance and responsibility under 

title 10, U.S.C., sections 601 and 3036: 

Mar 15, 2007 Reported by Mr. 

Levin, Committee on Armed 

Services, without printed 

report. 

to be Lieutenant General 

 Lt. Gen. Robert L. Van Antwerp, Jr., 

UNITED STATES AGENCY FOR 

INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT 

* 53 113 Douglas Menarchik, of Texas, to be an Assistant 

Administrator of the United States Agency for 

International Development. (Reappointment) 

Mar 28, 2007 Reported by Mr. 

Biden, Committee on Foreign 

Relations, without printed 

report. 

* 54 79 Katherine Almquist, of Virginia, to be an 

Assistant Administrator of the United States 

Agency for International Development, vice 

Lloyd O. Pierson, resigned. 

Mar 28, 2007 Reported by Mr. 

Biden, Committee on Foreign 

Relations, without printed 

report. 

* 55 193 Paul J. Bonicelli, of Virginia, to be an Assistant 

Administrator of the United States Agency for 

International Development, vice Adolfo A. 

Franco. 

Mar 28, 2007 Reported by Mr. 

Biden, Committee on Foreign 

Relations, without printed 

report. 

MARINE CORPS 

74 199-2 The following named officers for appointment in 

the United States Marine Corps to the grade 

indicated under title 10, U.S.C., section 624: 

Mar 28, 2007 Reported by Mr. 

Levin, Committee on Armed 

Services, without printed 

report. 

to be Major General 

 Brig. Gen. John F. Kelly, 

 [NEW REPORTS] 

THE JUDICIARY 

76 26 Halil Suleyman Ozerden, of Mississippi, to be 

United States District Judge for the Southern 

District of Mississippi, vice David C. Bramlette, 

retired. 

Apr 12, 2007 Reported by Mr. 

Leahy, Committee on the 

Judiciary, without printed 

report.
§ 1641.15 Response to notice of proposed suspension. ( a ) The IPA shall have 10 days from receipt of the notice within which to respond.
( b ) The response shall be in writing and may include information and argument in opposition to the proposed suspension, including any additional specific information pertaining to the possible causes for suspension, and information and argument in mitigation of the proposed period of suspension.
( c ) The response may request a meeting with the OIG official identified in the notice to permit the IPA to discuss issues of fact or law relating to the proposed suspension, or to otherwise resolve the pending matters. ( 1 ) Any such meeting shall take such form as the debarring official deems appropriate and shall be held within 10 days of the response.
( 2 ) No meeting will be held if a law enforcement official, an investigative or audit official from another OIG, a state licensing body or other organization with authority over IPAs, or a governmental agency has advised in writing that the substantial interest of a governmental unit would be prejudiced by such a meeting and the debarring official determines that the suspension is based on the same facts as the pending legal proceedings referenced by the law enforcement official.
( d ) Failure to respond to the notice shall be deemed an admission of the existence of the cause(s) for suspension set forth in the notice and an acceptance of the period of suspension. In such circumstances, the OIG may proceed to a final decision without further proceedings.
§ 1159.6 What limits exist as to the contents of the Endowment's systems of records? ( a ) The Endowment shall maintain only such information about an individual as is relevant and necessary to accomplish a purpose of the agency required by statute or by executive order of the President. In addition, the Endowment shall maintain all records that are used in making determinations about any individual with such accuracy, relevance, timeliness, and completeness as is reasonably necessary to ensure fairness to that individual in the making of any determination about him or her. However, the Endowment shall not be required to update retired records.
( b ) The Endowment shall not maintain any record about any individual with respect to or describing how such individual exercises rights guaranteed by the First Amendment of the Constitution of the United States, unless expressly authorized by statute or by the subject individual, or unless pertinent to and within the scope of an authorized law enforcement activity.
§ 1604.2 Definitions. As used in this part— ( a ) *Full-time attorney* means an attorney who is employed full-time by a recipient in legal assistance activities supported in major part by the Corporation, and who is authorized to practice law in the jurisdiction where assistance is provided.
( b ) *Outside practice of law* means the provision of legal assistance to a client who is not receiving that legal assistance from the employer of the full-time attorney rendering assistance, but does not include court appointments except where specifically stated or the performance of duties as a Judge Advocate General Corps attorney in the United States armed forces reserves.
( c ) *Court appointment* means an appointment in a criminal or civil case made by a court or administrative agency under a statute, rule or practice applied generally to attorneys practicing in the court or before the administrative agency where the appointment is made.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-6269

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

CLARENCE LAMONT LYONS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Newport News. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (4:17-cr-00087-RGD-LRL-1)

Submitted: September 2, 2021 Decided: September 10, 2021

Before FLOYD and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Clarence Lamont Lyons, Appellant Pro Se. Jacqueline Romy Bechara, OFFICE OF THE 

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM: 

Clarence Lamont Lyons appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for 

compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A). Upon review of the record, we 

conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion. See 

United States v. Kibble, 992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir. 2021) (stating standard of review). 

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court 

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
§ 100.12 How may a state simplify, consolidate, or substitute federally required state plans? ( a ) As used in this section: ( 1 ) *Simplify* means that a state may develop its own format, choose its own submission date, and select the planning period for a state plan.
( 2 ) *Consolidate* means that a state may meet statutory and regulatory requirements by combining two or more plans into one document and that the state can select the format, submission date, and planning period for the consolidated plan.
( 3 ) *Substitute* means that a state may use a plan or other document that it has developed for its own purposes to meet Federal requirements.
( b ) If not inconsistent with law, a state may decide to try to simplify, consolidate, or substitute federally required state plans without prior approval by the Secretary.
( c ) The Secretary reviews each state plan that a state has simplified, consolidated, or substituted and accepts the plan only if its contents meet Federal requirements.
```

[House Report 106-908]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

106th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 2d Session                                                     106-908

======================================================================

 
WAIVING POINTS OF ORDER AGAINST THE CONFERENCE REPORT TO ACCOMPANY H.R. 
          4733, THE ENERGY AND WATER APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2001

                                _______
                                

 September 27, 2000.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

                                _______
                                

Mr. Hastings of Washington, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the 
                               following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 598]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 598, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

                summary of provisions of the resolution

    The resolution provides for the consideration of the 
conference 
report to accompany H.R. 4733, the Energy and Water 
Appropriations Act, 2001. The rule waives all points of order 
against the 
conference report and against its consideration. The rule 
further provides that the conference report shall be considered 
as read.

                                  

```
#### Brady, appellant, v. Brundage, sheriff, etc.

*Sheriff. Arrest and hail in civil action. Escape—re-arrest and surrender.*

Defendant, a sheriff, under an order of arrest in an action by plaintiff against <3., arrested (3. and took from him an undertaking signed by two sureties, who failed to justify upon being excepted to by plaintiff. (3. escaped, and after judgment and executions returned unsatisfied, plaintiff brought an action for the escape. During the pendency of this action, defendant re-arrested (3. and surrendered him in the county jail. *Held,*that defendant was exonerated from his liability upon *paying*the costs of the action.

Appeal from an order of the special term exonerating the defendant, Robert F. Brundage, sheriff of Westchester county, from liability for the escape of a party arrested by him in a civil action. The essential facts appear in the opinion.

Barhard, P. J.

The plaintiff commenced an action against one John J. McGurk, in which she procured an order of arrest. The defendant, under this order, arrested McGurk, and took from him an undertaking signed by two sureties, who failed to justify on their being excepted to by plaintiff. Ho new arrest was made and no new undertaking was given. It seems that the sheriff might easily have arrested the defendant after the failure to justify by the sureties. McGurk fled to Texas, and remained there in concealment until after judgment was obtained against him, and after an execution against his property was returned unsatisfied, and one against his person that he could not be found. This action was commenced against the sheriff in February, 1873, and was put at issue in May last. While this action was pending and in September, 1873, the sheriff re-arrested McGurk, and surrendered him in the county jail of Westchester county; and now makes this application to be exonerated from his liability. The court at special term exonerated him on his paying the costs of this action. The plaintiff appeals.

By the failure of the sureties to justify, the sheriff became himself “ liable as bail.” Code, § 201. He was entitled to the privileges of bail. *Buckman*v. *Comley,*9 How. 180; *Sartos*v. *Merceques,*9 id. 188. One of the privileges of bail is to exonerate himself within twenty days after suit, or within such further time as may be granted by the court, by surrendering the defendant in the order *622of arrest. Code, § 191. The object of the order of arrest was to procure the defendant personally to answer the execution in the action. This is accomplished. The plaintiff in this action is indemnified for his costs thus far. It would be a harsh rule, which would put on the sheriff an absolute liability to pay the judgment when the sureties fail-to justify. The defendant is entitled to .be bailed out day or night, and shall have reasonable opportunity to procure it before being committed to prison. Code, § 186. If the bail taken by the sheriff shall not justify, I see no reason why a larger liability should be imposed upon the sheriff than upon the bail if they had justified.

The order should be affirmed, with $10 costs.

*Order affirmed.*
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 223 (Monday, November 20, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67127-67128]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9290]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


Notice of Agency Meeting

    Pursuant to the provisions of the ``Government in the Sunshine 
Act'' (5 U.S.C. 552b), notice is hereby given that, at 2:29 p.m. on 
Wednesday, November 15, 2006, the Board of Directors of the Federal 
Deposit Insurance Corporation met in closed session to consider matters 
relating to the Corporation's supervisory activities.
    In calling the meeting, the Board determined, on motion of Director 
John C. Dugan (Comptroller of the Currency), seconded by Mr. Scott 
Polakoff, acting in the place and stead of Director John C. Reich 
(Office of Thrift Supervision), concurred in by Vice Chairman Martin J. 
Gruenberg, Director Thomas J. Curry, and Chairman Sheila C. Bair, that 
Corporation business required its consideration of the matters on less 
than seven days' notice to the public; that no earlier notice of the 
meeting was practicable; that the public interest did not require 
consideration of the matters in a meeting open to public observation; 
and that the matters could be considered in a closed meeting by 
authority of subsections (c)(4), (c)(6), (c)(8), and (c)(9)(A)(ii) of 
the ``Government in the Sunshine Act'' (5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(4), (c)(6), 
(c)(8), and (c)(9)(A)(ii)).
    The meeting was held in the Board Room of the FDIC Building located 
at 550-17th Street, NW., Washington, DC.

    Dated: November 15, 2006.


[[Page 67128]]


    Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Robert E. Feldman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 06-9290 Filed 11-15-06; 4:49 pm]
BILLING CODE 6714-01-M
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report of GateHouse Media, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for
the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                              
|--------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Mark R. Thompson                                          
|Mark R. Thompson                                              
|Chief Financial Officer                                       
|(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting
Officer)
|March 12, 2007
You are here: EPA Home Region 10 Air Page SIPs/EFSEC SIPEFSEC463-39-005 

SIP - EFSEC - 463 - 39 - 005 

WAC 463-39-005 ADOPTION BY REFERENCE. 

(1) The energy facility site evaluation council adopts the following sections or 

subsections of chapter 173-400 WAC by reference. 

State adopted: 0/21/95; EPA effective: 7/22/96

Citation Title State 

Effective 

Date 

Explanation 

WAC 173-400 General Regulations for Air Pollution Sources

400-030 Definitions 9/20/93

400-040 General Standards for Maximum Emissions 9/20/93 except (1)(c), and (1)(d), (2), 

(4), and the 2nd paragraph of 

(6)

400-050 Emission Standards for Combustion and 

Incineration Units

3/22/91 except the exception 

provision in (3) 

400-060 Emission Standards for General Process 

Units 

3/22/91

400-081 Startup and Shutdown 9/20/93

400-091 Voluntary Limits on Emissions 9/20/93 including all regulatory 

orders issued pursuant to this 

section

400-105 Records, Monitoring and Reporting 9/20/93

400-107 Excess Emissions 9/20/93

400-110 New Source Review (NSR) 9/20/93

400-112 Requirements for New Sources in 

Nonattainment Areas

9/20/93 except (8)

400-113 Requirements for New Sources in 

Attainment or Unclassifiable Areas 

9/20/93 except (5)

400-151 Retrofit Requirements for Visibility 

Protection 

3/22/91

400-161 Compliance Schedules 3/22/91

400-171 Public Involvement 9/20/93

400-190 Requirements for Nonattainment Areas 3/22/91

400-200 Creditable Stack Height & Dispersion 

Techniques

3/22/91

400-205 Adjustment for Atmospheric Conditions 3/22/91

Region 10: the Pacific Northwest

Last updated on Saturday, March 12th, 2011.

URL: http://yosemite.epa.gov/r10/airpage.nsf/SIPs/EFSEC/SIPEFSEC463-39-005

SIP - EFSEC - 463 - 39 - 005 Page 1 of 1

http://yosemite.epa.gov/r10/airpage.nsf/283d45bd5bb068e68825650f0064cdc2/de466ca47... 3/15/2011
§ 223.200 Determinations of surplus species. ( a ) Determinations that specific quantities of grades and species are surplus to domestic manufacturing needs and withdrawals of such determinations shall be made in accordance with title 5, United States Code, section 553.
( b ) Review of a determination shall be made at least once in every 3-year period. Notice of such review shall be published in the Federal Register. The public shall have no less than 30 days to submit comments on the review.
( c ) Alaska yellow cedar and Port Orford cedar, which the Secretary of Agriculture found to be surplus to domestic processing needs pursuant to 36 CFR 223.163, the rules in effect before August 20, 1990, shall continue in that status until new determinations are published.