alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 727 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 727

        To limit the price charged by manufacturers for insulin.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 9, 2023

 Mr. Sanders (for himself, Mr. Merkley, and Mr. Markey) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                 Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
        To limit the price charged by manufacturers for insulin.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Insulin for All Act of 2023''.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON PRICE OF INSULIN.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the 
price charged by manufacturers of insulin for insulin that is sold in 
the United States may not exceed $20 per 1000 units of insulin, which 
may be contained in one or more vials, pens, cartridges, or other forms 
of delivery.
    (b) Insulin Defined.--In this section, the term ``insulin'' means 
insulin that is licensed under subsection (a) or (k) of section 351 of 
the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 262) and continues to be 
marketed pursuant to such licensure.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of Meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

The Eastern Washington Cascades Provincial Advisory Committee and the Yakima Provincial Advisory Committee meeting that had been set for November 8, 2006 has been cancelled. The new date that the Eastern Washington Cascades Provincial Advisory Committee and the Yakima Provincial Advisory Committee will meet is Tuesday, December 12, 2006 at the Okanogan and Wenatchee National Forests Headquarters office, 215 Melody Lane, Wenatchee, WA. This meeting will begin at 9:30 a.m. and continue until 4 p.m. During this meeting Provincial Advisory Committee members will continue the collaboration process on forest plan issues relating to the preparation of a revised forest plan for the Okanogan and Wenatchee National Forests. All Eastern Washington Cascades and Yakima Province Advisory Committee meetings are open to the public.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Direct questions regarding this meeting to Paul Hart, Designated Federal Official, USDA, Wenatchee National Forest, 215 Melody Lane, Wenatchee, Washington 98801, 509-664-9200.

Dated: October 25, 2006.

Paul Hart,

Designated Federal Official, Okanogan and Wenatchee National Forests.

[FR Doc. 06-8976 Filed 10-30-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
Rev. 2021

STATEMENT OF DESIGNATION OF COUNSEL 

Provide one form for each Respondent/Witness

EMAIL cela@fec.gov

AR/MUR/RR/P-MUR# _______________________ 

Name of Counsel: _______________________________________________________________________ 

Firm: _________________________________________________________________________________ 

Address: _______________________________________________________________________________ 

_______________________________________________________________________________ 

Office#: ___________________________ Fax#: ________________________________ 

Mobile#: ___________________________ 

E-mail: ________________________________________________________________________________

The above-named individual and/or firm is hereby designated as my counsel and is authorized to receive any 

notifications and other communications from the Commission and to act on my behalf before the Commission. 

____________ _________________________________________________ _____________________

 Date (Signature - Respondent/Agent/Treasurer) Title

_____________________________________________________

 (Name – Please Print)

RESPONDENT: ________________________________________________________ (Please print Committee Name/ Company Name/Individual Named in Notification Letter)

Mailing Address: 

(Please Print)

________________________________________________________________________ 

 ________________________________________________________________________ 

Home#: ____________________________ Mobile#: ____________________________ 

Office#: ____________________________ Fax#: _______________________________ 

E-mail: _________________________________________________________________________________

This form relates to a Federal Election Commission matter that is subject to the confidentiality provisions of 52 U.S.C. § 30109(a)(12)(A). 

This section prohibits making public any notification or investigation conducted by the Federal Election Commission without the express 

written consent of the person under investigation. 

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

1050 First Street, NE 

Washington, DC
#### § 242.8 Penalties.

If you are convicted of violating any provision of 50 CFR Part 100 or 36 CFR Part 242, you may be punished by a fine or by imprisonment in accordance with the penalty provisions applicable to the public land where the violation occurred.
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeal of - )

)

CACI NSS, LLC ) ASBCA No. 63080

)

Under Contract No. FA8823-16-C-0004 )

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: Michael E. Ginsberg, Esq.

J. William Koegel, Jr., Esq.

 Counsel

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Arthur M. Taylor, Esq.

 DCMA Chief Trial Attorney

Kara M. Klaas, Esq.

 Trial Attorney

 Defense Contract Management Agency

 Chantilly, VA

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice.

Dated: August 19, 2022

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 63080, Appeal of CACI NSS, LLC, 

rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.

Dated: August 22, 2022

JOHN J. THRASHER

Administrative Judge

Chairman

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

PAULLA K. GATES-LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
!

""""""""""""

#$%&'()*+' ,-.,/0,1,1/2&*&'

'3'4(56(*&778(9 

:;,<=39>=,'72&*&&?'4)*@*)A

BCDECFGHIJGCKBJHLJMCHNBCLOJMFHJ

PFHQRKJSTJKKJSU

VEEJKKCHLW

XY

ZJNJMCK[KJQLF\HB\DDFWWF\HUJLCKYU

VEEJKKJJW

!#!

]HCQQ\MNCHQJ^FLOLOJ_`NGDJHL\aVEMFKbcUdeddUCHNE`MW`CHLL\ZJNJMCKf`KJ

\aVEEJKKCLJgM\QJN`MJhbULOFWQ\HWLFL`LJWLOJa\MDCKDCHNCLJ\aLOFWQ\`MLY

3

iCMRjYICHGJMUBKJMR

klm nWn

oCHFJKjYfJFNS

oJE`LSBKJMR

IFHRL\LOJ_`NGDJHLaFKJNVEMFKbcUdedd

pqrsrtuvwxyz{|}y~vwy{||{v|yx|xxtvyy

Case 1:19-cv-02336-JEB Document 59 Filed 06/13/22 Page 1 of 1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 224 / Tuesday, November 21, 2006 / Notices 67337 

[FR Doc. 06–9297 Filed 11–21–06; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–C 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Office of the Secretary 

[Transmittal No. 07–04] 

36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification 

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense 

Security Cooperation Agency. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is 

publishing the unclassified text of a 

section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. 

This is published to fulfill the 

requirements of section 155 of Public 

Law 104–164 dated 21 July 1996. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

J. Hurd, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 604–

6575. 

The following is a copy of a letter to 

the Speaker of the House of 

Representatives, Transmittal 07–04 with 

attached transmittal and policy 

justification. 

Dated: November 14, 2006. 

C.R. Choate, 

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison 

Officer, Department of Defense. 

BILLING CODE 5006–06–M 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICESEN21NO06.004</GPH>
67338 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 224 / Tuesday, November 21, 2006 / Notices 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICESEN21NO06.005</GPH>
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 224 / Tuesday, November 21, 2006 / Notices 67339 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICESEN21NO06.006</GPH>
67340 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 224 / Tuesday, November 21, 2006 / Notices 

[FR Doc. 06–9298 Filed 11–21–06; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–C 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

GENERAL SERVICES 

ADMINISTRATION 

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND 

SPACE ADMINISTRATION 

[OMB Control No. 9000–0157] 

Federal Acquisition Regulation; 

Information Collection; ArchitectEngineer Qualifications (SF 330) 

AGENCIES: Department of Defense (DOD), 

General Services Administration (GSA), 

and National Aeronautics and Space 

Administration (NASA). 

ACTION: Notice of request for public 

comments regarding an extension to an 

existing OMB clearance (9000–0157). 

SUMMARY: Under the provisions of the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 

U.S.C. Chapter 35), the Federal 

Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 

Secretariat will be submitting to the 

Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB) a request to review and approve 

an extension of a currently approved 

information collection requirement for 

the Architect—Engineer Qualifications 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICESEN21NO06.007</GPH>
§ 1326.101 Authority of presiding officer. ( a ) The presiding officer has the duty to conduct a fair hearing, avoid delay, maintain order, and make a record of the proceedings. The presiding officer has all powers necessary to accomplish these ends, including, but not limited to, the power to: ( 1 ) Change the date, time, and place of the hearing, upon notice to the parties. This includes the power to continue the hearing in whole or in part;
( 2 ) Hold conferences to settle or simplify the issues in a proceeding, or to consider other matters that may aid in the expeditious disposition of the proceedings;
( 3 ) Regulate participation of parties and amici curiae and require parties and amici curiae to state their positions with respect to the issues in the proceeding;
( 4 ) Administer oaths and affirmations;
( 5 ) Rule on motions and other procedural items on matters pending before him or her, including issuance of protective orders or other relief to a party against whom discovery is sought;
( 6 ) Regulate the course of the hearing and conduct of counsel therein;
( 7 ) Examine witnesses;
( 8 ) Receive, rule on, exclude, or limit evidence or discovery;
( 9 ) Fix the time for filing motions, petitions, briefs, or other items in matters pending before him or her;
( 10 ) If the presiding officer is the Secretary, or his or her designee, make a final decision;
( 11 ) If the presiding officer is a person other than the Secretary or his or her designee, the presiding officer shall certify the entire record, including recommended findings and proposed decision, to the Secretary or his or her designee; and
( 12 ) Take any action authorized by the rules in this subpart or 5 U.S.C. 551-559.
( b ) The presiding officer does not have authority to compel the production of witnesses, papers, or other evidence by subpoena.
( c ) If the presiding officer is a person other than the Secretary or his or her designee, his or her authority is to render a recommended decision with respect to program requirements which are to be considered at the hearing. In case of any noncompliance, he or she shall recommend whether payments or allotments should be withheld with respect to the entire State plan or the activities of the State's Protection and Advocacy System, or whether the payments or allotments should be withheld only with respect to those parts of the program affected by such noncompliance.
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Universal Ice Blast Inc., (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Rory Clarke, Director, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Rory Clarke

By  ____________________________________

Rory Clarke

Director, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer



Date:  May 20, 2004



































































17
**Exhibit 15.1**

**REPORT AND CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED**

**PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

The Board of Directors 

North American Energy Partners Inc. 

The audits of North American Energy Partners Inc. (formerly NACG Holdings Inc.) (the “Company”) referred to in our report dated June 19, 2007,included the related financial statement schedules as of March 31, 2007 and 2006, and for each of the years in the three-year period ended March 31, 2007, included in Form 20-F. These financial statement schedules are the responsibility of theCompany’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statement schedules based on our audits. In our opinion, such financial statement schedules, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financialstatements taken as a whole, present fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein. 

We consent to the incorporation byreference in the registration statement (No. 333-139386) on Form S-8 of North American Energy Partners Inc. (formerly NACG Holdings Inc.) of our audit report dated June 19, 2007 with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of North AmericanEnergy Partners Inc. as at March 31, 2007 and 2006 and the related consolidated statements of operations and deficit and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended March 31, 2007 and the related financial statement schedules,which report appears in the March 31, 2007 annual report on Form 20-F of the Company. 

Our report refers to changes in accounting policiesby the Company as discussed in Note 2(r) to the consolidated financial statements, with respect to the accounting for stock-based compensation for employees eligible to retire before the vesting date and determining the variability to be consideredin applying the variable interest entities standards in 2007. 

/s/    KPMG LLP 

Edmonton, Canada 

June 19, 2007
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-21069 Conference Calendar

LESLIE WILLIAM MORGAN, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus GEORGE H. GODWIN; CHARLES BACARISSE; JOHN B. HOLMES; SCOTT ANTHONY DURFEE; JAY S. SISKIND; JAMES MICHAEL LEITNER, Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-98-CV-1205

-------------------- August 24, 1999 Before KING, Chief Judge, and DAVIS and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Leslie William Morgan, Texas prisoner # 677163, appeals the dismissal of his civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). To prevail on his denial-of-access-to-the-courts claim, Morgan must show that his legal position was prejudiced by the alleged violation. Henthorn v. Swinson , 955 F.2d 351, 354 (5th Cir. 1992). Neither in his original complaint nor on appeal has Morgan specifically statedNo. 98-21069 -2- which claims he was prevented from presenting to the courts by the members of the alleged conspiracy. The district court did not err in dismissing his claims under § 1915(e)(2)(B) because his conclusional allegations were insufficient to state a claim under § 1983. See Hale v. Harney , 786 F.2d 688, 690 (5th Cir. 1986). Morgan’s appeal is without arguable merit and is frivolous. See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Morgan had, prior to the filing of this suit, one verified strike. Morgan v. Coker , No. 97-20300 (5th Cir. Aug 13, 1998) (unpublished). Because of the district court’s dismissal as frivolous of the original action and this court’s dismissal as frivolous of the appeal, Morgan has now acquired two more strikes. He may no longer proceed IFP in any civil action or appeal filed while he is in prison unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g); Adepegba v. Hammons , 103 F.3d 383, 388 (5th Cir. 1996). APPEAL DISMISSED; 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) BAR IMPOSED.
INCREASE ALTERNATIVE FUEL USE BY 5 TO 

8%

REDUCE CO BY 25 TO 35%

REDUCE NOx BY 30 TO 50%

STRATIFIED INTERNAL KILN GASSES ARE A SIGNIFICANT CONTRIBUTOR TO KILN EMISSIONS. 

MIXING TECHNOLOGIES BREAK UP STRATIFICATION, IMPROVE COMBUSTION 

AND PERMIT MORE ALTERNATIVE FUEL USE.

Higher temperature oxygen-rich gasses tend to travel 

along the top of the kiln while cooler, carbon dioxide-rich 

gasses tend to travel along the bottom. This gas 

stratification actually inhibits the combustion process, 

limits alternative fuel usage and contributes to 

emissions.

When Mixing Air is added, opposing streams of high 

velocity air cause the stratifed kiln gas layers to rotate 

and mix. This rotation improves combustion, serves to 

reduce emissions and improves the overall stability of 

the kiln.

Mixing Air is a significant advance in the area of cement 

kiln emissions reduction. Not only does Mixing Air allow 

maximum alternative fuel usage, operational tests and 

actual operating data have shown that Mixing Air can 

reduce NOx emissions by 50% while significantly 

reducing SOx, CO and other emissions.

MixingTechnology Page 1 of 2

http://www.cadencerecycling.com/mixingtechnology.html 8/1/2012
Mixing Air is equally effective on 

preheater/precalciner kilns as well as long 

kilns.

About Customers Mid-Kiln Mixing Air Mixing Energy SNCR News Technical Contact Questions ... ASK ED

MixingTechnology Page 2 of 2

http://www.cadencerecycling.com/mixingtechnology.html 8/1/2012
% Residential exposure, 30 days, daily shower, 10% dissipation daily
% Getting peak chlorpyrifos concentration at 60 pg/g in blood on the first day
% 2h/day, 8h/day, or 16h/day exposures
% February 3, 2016
% Cecilia Tan


% Setting model parameters
use human_parameters_MRP
use preg_female_parameters
BWSW=1;	%Set BW to a fixed value
BWST=75;	%Set BW to 75 kg
PREG=0;	% Not pregnant
DZONE = 1;	%
KDIS = 0.1;	%10% daily dissipation
TSTOP=1000;	%Simulation time in hours

% Dermal exposure
SAF= 0.5;	 	% Fraction of skin in contact with chlorpyrifos.
FAD=1;     	% Fraction of dose available to be absorbed. Values of <1 could be used if pesticide is encapsulated. 
%DERM = 3.6;		% dose in ug/kg for 16 h/day exposure
DERM = 3.7;		% dose in ug/kg for 8 h/day exposure
%DERM = 6.2;		% dose in ug/kg for 2 h/day exposure
D3=7;  %DAYS/WEEK
%P2=16; %HRS/DAY
P2 = 8;	%hours/day
%P2=2;
S2=0 ;%OFFSET FROM 0 START TIME (EG IF YOU WANT TO MODEL FROM MIDNIGHT, BUT DOSE AT 8 AM)
W2=30; %30 day exposure

prepare @clear@all
start @NoCallback
simall = [_time _rbcce _urinetcpy _cv*350.6*1000 _cvo*334.5*1000];	%conc unit = pg/g

save simall @file='residential_firstday_02032016_8h_30day' @format=ascii
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this Amendment No. 1 to the quarterly report of Park-Ohio Industries, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to such officers knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.



By

/s/ EDWARD F. CRAWFORDName: Edward F. Crawford
Title: Chairman and Chief Executive Officer




By

/s/ PATRICK W. FOGARTYName: Patrick W. Fogarty
Title: Interim Chief Financial Officer,
Director of Corporate Development


Date: May 14, 2012

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
§ 1182.12 Fees charged to locate, review, or copy records. ( a ) The Institute shall charge no fees for search time or for any other time expended by the Institute to review a record. However, the Institute may charge fees where you request that a copy be made of a record to which you have been granted access. Where a copy of the record must be made in order to provide access to the record (e.g., computer printout where no screen reading is available), the copy will be made available to you without cost.
( b ) Copies of records made by photocopy or similar process will be charged to you at the rate of $0.10 per page. Where records are not susceptible to photocopying (e.g., punch cards, magnetic tapes, or oversize materials), you will be charged actual cost as determined on a case-by-case basis. A copying fee totaling $3.00 or less shall be waived, but the copying fees for contemporaneous requests by the same individual shall be aggregated to determine the total fee.
( c ) Special and additional services provided at your request, such as certification or authentication, postal insurance, and special mailing arrangement costs, will be charged to you.
( d ) A copying fee shall not be charged or, alternatively, it may be reduced, when the General Counsel determines, based on a petition, that the petitioning individual is indigent and that the Institute's resources permit a waiver of all or part of the fee.
( e ) All fees shall be paid before any copying request is undertaken. Payments shall be made by check or money order payable to the “Institute of Museum and Library Services.”