alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AMENDMENT NO. 5 TO

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT AND

AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO CHANGE OF CONTROL AGREEMENT

                   
This Amendment No. 5 to Employment Agreement and Amendment No. 4 to Change of
Control Agreement is made as of the 31st day of October, 2000, by and between
Stewart Enterprises, Inc., a Louisiana corporation (the "Company"),
and Brent F. Heffron (the "Employee").


W I T N E S S E T H:


                   
WHEREAS, the Company has entered into an Employment Agreement with the Employee
dated as of January 1, 1997, which has been previously amended four times (as
amended, the "Employment Agreement");

                   
WHEREAS, the Company has entered into a Change of Control Agreement with the
Employee dated as of January 1, 1997, which has been previously amended three
times (as amended, the "Change of Control Agreement"); and

                   
WHEREAS, the Company and the Employee have agreed to an extension of the terms
of the Employment Agreement and the Change of Control Agreement, as set forth
herein.

                   
NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the continued employment of Employee
by the Company and the payment of wages, salary and other compensation to
Employee by the Company, the parties hereto agree as follows, effective
October 31, 2000:

                   
Section 1.     Except as expressly amended herein, all
of the terms and provisions of the Employment Agreement and Change of Control
Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

                   
Section 2.     Article I, Section 2 of the Employment
Agreement is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:


  
               
    Employment Term.     The term of this Agreement (the
    "Employment Term") shall commence on the Agreement Date and shall
    continue through October 31, 2001, subject to any earlier termination
    of Employee's status as an employee pursuant to this Agreement.

  



                   
Section 3.     Article II, Section 2.1(a) of the Change
of Control Agreement is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:


  
               
    2.1     Employment Term and Capacity after
    Change of Control. (a) If a Change of Control occurs on or before
    October 31, 2001, then the Employee's employment term (the
    "Employment Term") shall continue through the second anniversary
    of the Change of Control, subject to any earlier termination of Employee's
    status as an employee pursuant to this Agreement.

  



                   
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be duly
executed and signed as of the date indicated above.

	 	STEWART ENTERPRISES, INC.
      By:  /s/ James W. McFarland                  

                  James W. McFarland

                 Compensation Committee Chairman

	 	 
      EMPLOYEE:

        /s/   Brent F. Heffron                          

                         
      Brent F. Heffron
II 

Calendar No. 142 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 843 

[Report No. 118–68] 

To amend the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act to authorize the 

use of funds for certain additional Carey Act projects, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 16, 2023 

Mr. RISCH introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

JULY 19, 2023 

Reported by Mr. MANCHIN, without amendment 

A BILL 

To amend the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act to 

authorize the use of funds for certain additional Carey 

Act projects, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 843 RS

1 SECTION 1. ELIGIBILITY UNDER THE INFRASTRUCTURE IN2 VESTMENT AND JOBS ACT OF ADDITIONAL 

3 CAREY ACT PROJECTS FOR CERTAIN FUNDS. 

4 Section 40904(b) of the Infrastructure Investment 

5 and Jobs Act (43 U.S.C. 3204(b)) is amended— 

6 (1) in paragraph (3), by redesignating subpara7 graphs (A) through (C) as clauses (i) through (iii), 

8 respectively, and indenting appropriately; 

9 (2) by redesignating paragraphs (1) through 

10 (4) as subparagraphs (A) through (D), respectively, 

11 and indenting appropriately; 

12 (3) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A) 

13 (as so redesignated), by striking ‘‘The Secretary’’ 

14 and inserting the following: 

15 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary’’; and 

16 (4) by adding at the end the following: 

17 ‘‘(2) ADDITIONAL PROJECTS.— 

18 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—On making the af19 firmative determinations described in subpara20 graph (B), the Secretary shall use amounts 

21 made available under section 40901(2)(B) to 

22 fund the rehabilitation, reconstruction, or re23 placement of any dams that were developed 

24 pursuant to, and continue to operate as dams 

25 under, section 4 of the Act of August 18, 1894 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 843 RS

1 (commonly known as the ‘Carey Act’) (43 

2 U.S.C. 641; 28 Stat. 422, chapter 301). 

3 ‘‘(B) DETERMINATIONS DESCRIBED.—The 

4 determinations referred to in subparagraph (A) 

5 are— 

6 ‘‘(i) a determination by the Secretary 

7 that any dams that meet the criteria de8 scribed in paragraph (1) have received the 

9 necessary funding to complete rehabilita10 tion, reconstruction, or replacement activi11 ties under this subsection; and 

12 ‘‘(ii) a determination by the Secretary 

13 that amounts made available under section 

14 40901(2)(B) remain available.’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 142 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 843 

[Report No. 118–68] 

A BILL 

To amend the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs 

poses. ditional Carey Act projects, and for other purAct to authorize the use of funds for certain adJULY 19, 2023 

Reported without amendment 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
No. 5542.

#### John Beeson *v.*The State.

Malicious Mischief.—Information in this case, charging malicious injury to a private store house, was formulated under Article 683 of the Penal Code, which article relates only to the destruction of or injury to “growing fruit, corn, grain, or other agricultural product or property, real or personal." The information, therefore, charges no offense against the laws of the State, and will not support this conviction.

Appeal from the County Court of Llano. Tried below before the Hon. E. C. Bonham, County Judge.

The opinion states the case. The penalty imposed was a fine of twenty-five dollars.

No brief for the appellant.

*W. L. Davidson,*Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Willson, Judge.

In this case the information charges that the defendant “did willfully and mischievously injure and destroy certain property, to wit, ten panes of window glass, by then and there breaking and knocking the said panes of glass out of the window of a certain store house then and there situated in the town of Llano, in said county, the same being then and there the property of Miles Barter,” etc.

This prosecution was no doubt maintained in the trial court under Article 683 of the Penal Code. That Article does not relate to the destruction of, or injuries to, the kind of property named in the indictment. It relates only to “growing fruit, corn, grain, or other agricultural product or property, real or personal.” A store house is not agricultural property, and is not within the protection of this statute. (Murray and Anthony v. The State, 21 Texas Ct. App., 620.) The facts charged in the information do not constitute an offense against the penal law of this State, and the court erred in not sustaining defendant’s exceptions to the information.

Because of this error, the judgment- is reversed, and because *407the information charges no offense against the law, the prosecution is dismissed.

Opinion delivered June 1, 1887.

*Reversed and*dismissed.
§ 703.15 Purpose and scope of this subpart. This subpart sets forth the policy and procedures of the Library of Congress regarding, first, the testimony, as witnesses in legal proceedings where the Library is not a party, of employees and former employees concerning information acquired in the course of performing official duties or because of the employee's official relationship with the Library of Congress, and second, the production or disclosure of information contained in Library of Congress documents for use in legal proceedings where the Library is not a party, pursuant to a request, order, or subpoena (collectively referred to in this subpart as a “demand”). ( a ) This subpart applies to: ( 1 ) State court proceedings (including grand jury proceedings);
( 2 ) Federal court proceedings; and
( 3 ) State and local legislative and administrative proceedings.
( b ) This subpart does not apply to: ( 1 ) Matters that are not related to the Library of Congress but relate solely to an employee's personal dealings;
( 2 ) Congressional demands for testimony or documents;
( 3 ) Any demand relating to activity within the scope of Title 17 of the United States Code (the Copyright Act and related laws). These are governed by Copyright Office regulations, which provide for different procedures and for service on the General Counsel of the Copyright Office. *See* 37 CFR 201.1, sec. 203, sec. 204, and sec. 205.
( c ) The purpose of this subpart is to ensure that employees' official time is used only for official purposes, to maintain the impartiality of the Library of Congress among private litigants, to ensure that public funds are not used for private purposes, to ensure the protection of Congress' interests, and to establish centralized procedures for deciding whether or not to approve testimony or the production of documents.
Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = Hyd Pdt > mo

Sorption to soils/sediments = Hyd Pdt v.strong

PBT Potential: PMN P1B1; Hyd Pdt P3B1

*CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = Hyd Pdt negl

 Health:

 Health Summary: Absorption is nil all routes (pchem). There is concern for 

irritation to all exposed tissues based on the high number of groups present in the 

PMN material. Low moderate concern.

 Ecotox:

Test 

Organism

Test 

Type

Test End 

Point

Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 *

daphnid 48-h LC50 *

green algal 96-h EC50 *

fish _ chronic 

value

*

daphnid _ chronic 

value

*

algal _ chronic 

value

*

Sewage 

Sludge

3-h EC50 _

Sewage 

Sludge

_ Chronic 

Value

_

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions based on SARs for nonionic polymers; SAR 

chemical class = polymer-nonionic-NCO; MWn 8500 with 0% <1000; solid with mp unknown 

(P); S = reacts with water at 20 C (P); pH7; hardness <150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; ECs based on 

100% active ingredients and nominal concentrations, and TOC <2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments

Assessment Factor 10

Concentration of Concern 

(ppb) 

Acute 

*

Concentration of Concern 

(ppb) Chronic

*

SARs nonionic polymers

SAR Class polymer-nonionic-NCO

TSCA New Chemcial 

Category 

Nonionic Polymers
Ecotox Factors Comments: 

 SAT Chair: Becky Jones 

 Fate assessor: W. Lee Ecotox assessor: Alie Muneer Health assessor:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-03-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-01-1999
<CASH>                                          26,408
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   90,849
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (2,356)
<INVENTORY>                                     43,555
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               207,322
<PP&E>                                         886,702
<DEPRECIATION>                               (321,583)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 832,993
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          187,835
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   (141,479)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   832,993
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               188,617
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  166,137
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (641)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,424
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,697
<INCOME-TAX>                                       457
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,240
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,240
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on September 27, 2006, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Southwest Research Institute: Cooperative Research Group on High Efficiency Durable Gasoline Engine (“HEDGE”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Federal Mogul Corporation, Plymouth, MI has been added as a party to this venture.                 

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and HEDGE intends to file additional written notification disclosing all changes in membership. 

                    On June 10, 2005, HEDGE filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on July 7, 2005 (70 FR 39339).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on August 7, 2006. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on September 8, 2006 (71 FR 53134).                

Patricia A. Brink,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 06-9338 Filed 11-21-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
Case 16-27258 Doc 6 Filed 08/25/16 Entered 08/25/16 10:03:34 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2
Case 16-27258 Doc 6 Filed 08/25/16 Entered 08/25/16 10:03:34 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2
###### Editorial Note on Part 1304

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1304 appear at 89 FR 67817, Aug. 21, 2024.

#### § 1304.10 Purpose and scope.

The purpose of this subpart is to set forth policies and procedures for the designation renewal of Head Start programs. It is intended that these programs be administered effectively and responsibly; that applicants to administer programs receive fair and equitable consideration; and that the legal rights of current Head Start grant recipients be fully protected. The Designation Renewal System is established in this part to determine whether Head Start agencies deliver high-quality services to meet the educational, health, nutritional, and social needs of the children and families they serve; meet the program and financial requirements and standards described in section 641A(a)(1) of the Head Start Act; and qualify to be designated for funding for five years without competing for such funding as required under section 641(c) or 645A(b)(12) and (d) of the Head Start Act. A competition to select a new Head Start agency to replace a Head Start agency that has been terminated voluntarily or involuntarily is not part of the Designation Renewal System established in this part, and is subject instead to the requirements of § 1304.20.

[89 FR 67817, Aug. 21, 2024]
<PAGE>

                                                                Exhibit 10.41

                               AMENDING AGREEMENT


         This Amending Agreement is dated as of December 1, 2000, and is by and
between cMeRun Corp., a Delaware corporation ("cMeRun") and _______________, a
member of the Board of Directors of cMeRun ("Director").

                                    RECITALS

         WHEREAS, the parties hereto executed an Agreement dated ______________
(the "Directorship Agreement"), appended hereto as EXHIBIT A, Section 2.3 of
which provides that cMeRun shall issue to Director 50,000 restricted common
shares of the Company (the "Shares");

         WHEREAS, the Company has never issued the Shares;

         WHEREAS, the Director, with the consent of cMeRun, wishes to reject
the right to receive the Shares; and

         WHEREAS, in consideration of the agreements set forth herein, the
parties wish to amend the Directorship Agreement to remove the provision
regarding the issuance of the Shares.

                                    AGREEMENT

                  Now, therefore, for good and valuable consideration the
receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto
agree as follows:

         1. The Directorship Agreement shall be amended by deleting Section 2.3
thereof.

         2. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the
parties hereto and their respective successors and permitted assigns. No such
party may assign either this Agreement or any of its rights, interests or
obligations hereunder without the prior written approval of the other parties
hereto.

         3. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, all of which shall
be considered one and the same instrument, each being deemed to constitute an
original, and shall be effective when one or more counterparts have been signed
by each party and delivered to the other parties, which delivery may be made by
facsimile transmission.

<PAGE>

         4. This Agreement shall be governed by, and interpreted in accordance
with, the laws of, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, without regard to any
applicable conflicts of law.


         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, cMeRun and Director have caused this instrument to
be executed, under seal, in counterparts, as of the date first above written.


                                        DIRECTOR


                                        By:
                                           ------------------------------------




                                        CMERUN CORP.


                                        By:
                                           ------------------------------------
                                                  Name:
Exhibit 4.12

 SCHEDULE OF DOCUMENTS SIMILAR TO EXHIBIT 4.11 THAT HAVE BEEN OMITTED FROM THIS
  ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K (WITH AN EXPLANATION OF MATERIAL DETAILS IN WHICH
                SUCH OMITTED DOCUMENTS DIFFER FROM EXHIBIT 4.11).

     On January 11, 2008, Cavit Sciences,  Inc., acting pursuant to its November
29, 2007, Agreement with Isthmus Investments  Management,  S.A. (Exhibit 10.9 to
this Annual Report), issued a series of warrants to purchase Cavit common stock.
Cavit has elected to omit from its exhibits to this Annual  Report actual copies
of such warrants due to the voluminous and redundant  nature of such  additional
warrants.

     While the majority of the  language,  terms and  conditions  of the various
warrants are identical, the warrants differ in four areas: (i) class designation
of  warrants;  (ii) number of shares of common  stock  covered by the  warrants;
(iii) exercise price of the warrants and (iv) term of the warrants.

     The following table explains the  differences in the omitted  warrants from
the warrant attached to this Annual Report as Exhibit 4.9:

                           Number of
Class of Warrants      Shares Covered     Exercise Price         Term
-----------------      --------------     --------------         ----
        B                  125,000             $ .60         Nine months
        C                  125,000             $ .80         Twelve months
        D                  175,000             $1.00         Fifteen months
        E                  175,000             $1.25         Eighteen months
        F                  175,000             $1.50         Twenty-one months
        G                  175,000             $1.75         Twenty-four months
        I                  250,000             $2.00         Thirty-six months
        J                  175,000             $3.00         Forty-eight months
§ 1321.17 Appeal to the Departmental Appeals Board on planning and service area designation. ( a ) This section sets forth the procedures for providing hearings to applicants for designation as a planning and service area under § 1321.13, whose application is denied by the State agency or § 1321.15, whose application is denied by the Assistant Secretary for Aging.
( b ) Any applicant for designation as a planning and service area whose application is denied, and who has been provided a hearing and a written decision by the State agency, may appeal the denial to the Departmental Appeals Board (DAB) in writing following receipt of the State agency's written decision, in accordance with the procedures set forth in 45 CFR part 16. The applicant must, at the time of filing an appeal with the DAB, mail a copy of the appeal to the State agency, if appealing subject to § 1321.13, or the Assistant Secretary for Aging, if appealing subject to § 1321.15, and include a certificate of service with its initial filing. The DAB may refer an appeal to its Alternative Dispute Resolution Division for mediation prior to making a decision.
#### § 15.1 Uniform relocation assistance and real property acquisition.

Regulations and procedures for complying with the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (Pub. L. 91-646, 84 Stat. 1894, 42 U.S.C. 4601 *et seq.*), as amended by the Surface Transportation and Uniform Relocation Assistance Act of 1987 (Title IV of Pub. L. 100-17, 101 Stat. 246-256, 42 U.S.C. 4601 note) are set forth in 49 CFR part 24.

[52 FR 48026, Dec. 17, 1987 and 54 FR 8912, Mar. 2, 1989]