13024 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 48 / Friday, March 11, 2016 / Notices 

1CN Roads are indirect subsidiaries of Canadian 

National Railway Company (CNR). CNR’s U.S. rail 

subsidiaries, including CN Roads, are held directly 

or indirectly by Grand Trunk Corporation, a whollyowned, indirect subsidiary of CNR. 

• Average Time per Response: 45 

Minutes. 

• Total Estimated Burden Time: 

61,760 hours. 

• Frequency: On occasion. 

• Obligation to Respond: Required to 

Obtain a Benefit. 

We are soliciting public comments to 

permit the Department to: 

• Evaluate whether the proposed 

information collection is necessary for 

the proper functions of the Department. 

• Evaluate the accuracy of our 

estimate of the time and cost burden for 

this proposed collection, including the 

validity of the methodology and 

assumptions used. 

• Enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected. 

• Minimize the reporting burden on 

those who are to respond, including the 

use of automated collection techniques 

or other forms of information 

technology. 

Please note that comments submitted 

in response to this Notice are public 

record. Before including any detailed 

personal information, you should be 

aware that your comments as submitted, 

including your personal information, 

will be available for public review. 

Abstract of proposed collection: The 

primary purpose for soliciting this 

information is to validate an identity 

claim for a U.S. Passport Book or 

Passport Card in the narrow category of 

cases in which the evidence presented 

by an applicant is insufficient to 

establish identity. The information may 

also be used in adjudicating 

applications for other travel documents 

and services, and in connection with 

law enforcement, fraud prevention, 

border security, counterterrorism, 

litigation activities, and administrative 

purposes. 

Methodology: The Supplemental 

Questionnaire to Determine Identity for 

a U.S. Passport is intended to verify the 

respondent’s identity for purposes of 

determining eligibility for a U.S. 

passport. This form is used to 

supplement an existing passport 

application and solicits information 

relating to the respondent’s employment 

and residences that is needed to 

corroborate an applicant’s identity claim 

prior to passport issuance. 

Additional information: The Privacy 

Act statement has been amended to 

clarify that an applicant’s failure to 

provide his or her Social Security 

number may result in the denial of an 

application, consistent with Section 

32101 of the Fixing America’s Surface 

Transportation Act (Pub. L. 114–94) 

which authorizes the Department to 

deny U.S. passport applications when 

the applicant failed to include his or her 

Social Security number. 

Dated: March 4, 2016. 

Barry J. Conway, 

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Passport Services, Bureau of Consular Affairs, 

Department of State. 

[FR Doc. 2016–05563 Filed 3–10–16; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4710–06–P 

SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD 

[Docket No. FD 35961] 

Chicago Central & Pacific Railroad 

Company, Grand Trunk Western 

Railroad Company, Illinois Central 

Railroad Company, and Wisconsin 

Central Ltd.—Trackage Rights 

Exemption—Norfolk Southern Railway 

Company 

Norfolk Southern Railway Company 

(NSR), pursuant to a trackage rights 

agreement dated February 11, 2016, has 

agreed to grant Chicago Central & Pacific 

Railroad Company, Grand Trunk 

Western Railroad Company, Illinois 

Central Railroad Company, and 

Wisconsin Central Ltd. (collectively, CN 

Roads) overhead trackage rights in 

Chicago, Cook County, Ill., as follows: 

(1) Over NSR’s portion of rail line 

known as the CREATE Western Avenue 

Corridor, between milepost UW 0.0 (CP 

518) and milepost UW 5.3 (Ogden 

Junction), a distance of approximately 

5.3 miles; and (2) over a portion of 

NSR’s CREATE project WA7 track 

(when constructed), between Brighton 

Park and 21st Street, including that 

portion of track that connects to BNSF 

Railway Company’s Chillicothe 

Subdivision.1

CN Roads may consummate the 

transaction on or after March 25, 2016, 

the effective date of the exemption (30 

days after the verified notice of 

exemption was filed). 

According to CN Roads, the proposed 

trackage rights are intended to facilitate 

CREATE-related track projects (and 

transfers), and CN Roads will be granted 

the subject trackage rights as part of a 

series of transactions designed to 

promote railroad traffic fluidity in 

Chicago. 

As a condition to this exemption, any 

employees affected by the trackage 

rights will be protected by the 

conditions imposed in Norfolk & 

Western Railway—Trackage Rights— 

Burlington Northern, Inc., 354 I.C.C. 605 

(1978), as modified in Mendocino Coast 

Railway—Lease & Operate—California 

Western Railroad, 360 I.C.C. 653 (1980). 

This notice is filed under 49 CFR 

1180.2(d)(7). If the notice contains false 

or misleading information, the 

exemption is void ab initio. Petitions to 

revoke the exemption under 49 U.S.C. 

10502(d) may be filed at any time. The 

filing of a petition to revoke will not 

automatically stay the effectiveness of 

the exemption. Petitions for stay must 

be filed by March 18, 2016 (at least 

seven days before the exemption 

becomes effective). 

An original and 10 copies of all 

pleadings, referring to Docket No. FD 

35961, must be filed with the Surface 

Transportation Board, 395 E Street SW., 

Washington, DC 20423–0001. In 

addition, a copy of each pleading must 

be served on Robert A. Wimbish, 

Fletcher & Sippel LLC, 29 North Wacker 

Drive, Suite 920, Chicago, IL 60606. 

Board decisions and notices are 

available on our Web site at 

www.stb.dot.gov. 

Decided: March 8, 2016. 

By the Board, Rachel D. Campbell, 

Director, Office of Proceedings. 

Brendetta S. Jones, 

Clearance Clerk. 

[FR Doc. 2016–05539 Filed 3–10–16; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4915–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

[Policy Statement No. ANM–03–117–09] 

Policy Statement on Guidance for 

Determination of System, Hardware, 

and Software Development Assurance 

Levels on Transport Category 

Airplanes 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of cancellation of policy 

statement. 

SUMMARY: The Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA) announces the 

cancellation of Policy Statement 

Number ANM–03–117–09. The policy 

statement is cancelled because it was 

superseded by an advisory circular (AC) 

and is no longer necessary. 

DATES: This policy statement is 

cancelled on March 11, 2016. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Linh 

Le, Federal Aviation Administration, 

Transport Airplane Directorate, 

Transport Standards Staff, Safety 

Management Branch, 1601 Lind Avenue 

SW., Renton, WA 98057–3356; 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 48 / Friday, March 11, 2016 / Notices 13025 

telephone (425) 227–1105; fax (425) 

227–1320; email: linh.le@faa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On January 15, 2004, the Transport 

Airplane Directorate, Aircraft 

Certification Service, issued Policy 

Statement Number ANM–03–117–09, 

Policy Statement on Guidance for 

Determination of System, Hardware, 

and Software Development Assurance 

Levels on Transport Category Airplanes. 

This policy statement standardized the 

methodology for assigning development 

assurance levels (DAL) to systems, 

software, and complex electronic 

hardware. 

In December 2010, the Society of 

Automotive Engineers (SAE) issued the 

document, Aerospace Recommended 

Practice (ARP) 4754A, Guidelines for 

Development of Civil Aircraft and 

Systems, as an acceptable method for 

establishing a development assurance 

process. This document contains an 

updated methodology for DAL 

assignment. In developing ARP 4754A, 

SAE considered the subject policy 

statement, with inputs and guidance 

from the FAA. In September 2011, the 

FAA issued AC 20–174, Development of 

Civil Aircraft and Systems, to formally 

recognize ARP 4754A and the DAL 

assignment methodology contained 

therein. The Transport Airplane 

Directorate determined that AC 20–174 

and ARP 4754A provide an acceptable 

DAL assignment methodology for part 

25 airplanes. To ensure correct 

understanding of the Transport Airplane 

Directorate’s current policy for DAL 

assignments, the FAA is cancelling the 

subject policy, in favor of AC 20–174. 

Cancellation of Policy Statement 

As a result of the issuance of AC 20– 

174, Policy Statement Number ANM– 

03–117–09 is no longer in effect and is 

herewith cancelled. 

Issued in Renton, Washington, on March 1, 

2016. 

Michael Kaszycki, 

Acting Manager, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service, 

ANM–100. 

[FR Doc. 2016–05529 Filed 3–10–16; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

[Policy Statement No. PS–ANM100–1986– 

00051] 

Policy Regarding Use of H–11 Bolts in 

Primary Structure on Transport 

Airplanes 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of cancellation of policy 

statement. 

SUMMARY: The Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA) announces the 

cancellation of Policy Statement 

Number PS–ANM100–1986–00051. The 

policy statement is cancelled because it 

was superseded by an advisory circular 

(AC) and is no longer necessary. 

DATES: This policy statement is 

cancelled on March 11, 2016. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ian 

Won, Federal Aviation Administration, 

Transport Airplane Directorate, 

Transport Standards Staff, Airframe and 

Cabin Safety Branch, 1601 Lind Avenue 

SW., Renton, WA 98057–3356; 

telephone (425) 227–2145; fax (425) 

227–1320; email: Ian.Y.Won@faa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On May 16, 1986, the Manager, 

Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft 

Certification Service, issued Policy 

Statement Number PS–ANM100–1986– 

00051, Policy Regarding Use of H–11 

Bolts in Primary Structure on Transport 

Airplanes. This policy statement 

addressed the adverse service history on 

H–11 bolts used in primary structure. 

The FAA issued AC 20–127, Use of 

Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) 

Class H11 Bolts, on July 8, 1987. The AC 

incorporates the same guidance as the 

older policy statement. The FAA should 

have cancelled the policy when they 

issued the AC but overlooked it. 

Cancellation of Policy Statement 

As a result of the issuance of AC 20– 

127, Policy Statement Number PS– 

ANM100–1986–00051 is no longer in 

effect and is herewith cancelled. 

Issued in Renton, Washington, on March 1, 

2016. 

Michael Kaszycki, 

Acting Manager, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service, 

ANM–100. 

[FR Doc. 2016–05532 Filed 3–10–16; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

[Policy Statement No. PS–ANM100–1982– 

00038] 

FAR 25.723 Energy Absorption Tests 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of cancellation of policy 

statement. 

SUMMARY: The Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA) announces the 

cancellation of Policy Statement 

Number PS–ANM100–1982–00038. The 

policy statement is cancelled because it 

was superseded by an advisory circular 

(AC) and is no longer necessary. 

DATES: This policy statement is 

cancelled on March 11, 2016. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ian 

Won, Federal Aviation Administration, 

Transport Airplane Directorate, 

Transport Standards Staff, Airframe and 

Cabin Safety Branch, 1601 Lind Avenue 

SW., Renton, WA 98057–3356; 

telephone (425) 227–2145; fax (425) 

227–1320; email: Ian.Y.Won@faa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On April 13, 1982, the Manager, 

Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft 

Certification Service, issued Policy 

Statement Number PS–ANM100–1982– 

00038, FAR 25.723 Energy Absorption 

Tests. This policy statement addressed 

limits of extrapolation of landing gear 

drop test data. 

The FAA issued AC 25.723–1, Shock 

Absorption Tests, on May 25, 2001, 

concurrently with Amendment 25–103, 

which changed the rule, 14 CFR 25.723. 

The AC addresses the same issue as the 

older policy statement but reflects the 

latest rule and is more specific. The 

FAA intended to cancel the policy when 

they released AC 25.723–1 but 

overlooked it. 

Cancellation of Policy Statement 

As a result of the issuance of AC 

25.723–1 and Amendment 25–103, 

Policy Statement Number PS–ANM100– 

1982–00038 is no longer in effect and is 

herewith cancelled. 

Issued in Renton, Washington, on March 1, 

2016. 

Michael Kaszycki, 

Acting Manager, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service, 

ANM–100. 

[FR Doc. 2016–05531 Filed 3–10–16; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES