alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 226 (Friday, November 24, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 67866]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9390]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

November 13, 2006.

TIME AND DATE: 10 a.m., Thursday, November 30, 2006.

PLACE: The Richard V. Backley Hearing Room, 9th Floor, 601 New Jersey 
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC.

STATUS: Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The Commission will consider and act upon the 
following in open session: Secretary of Labor v. Jim Walter Resources, 
Inc., Docket No. SE 2005-51. (Issues include whether substantial 
evidence, including inferences drawn from the record, supports the 
conclusion of the Administrative Law Judge that the operator violated 
30 CFR 75.1725(c) when a miner allegedly performed maintenance work on 
a conveyor belt without cutting off the power and blocking the belt 
against motion; whether the judge correctly concluded that the 
violation was significant and substantial; and whether the judge 
properly assessed the penalty against the operator.)
    The Commission heard oral argument in this matter on November 15, 
2006.
    Any person attending this oral argument who requires special 
accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language 
interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those needs. 
Subject to 20 CFR 2706.150(a)(3) and 2706.160(d).

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFO: Jean Ellen, (202) 434-9950/(202) 708-9300 
for TDD Relay/1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

Jean H. Ellen,
Chief Docket Clerk.
[FR Doc. 06-9390 Filed 11-20-06; 4:39 pm]
BILLING CODE 6735-01-M
#### Myer Nussbaum, Respondent, *v.*The State of New York, Appellant.

*Nussbaum*v. *State of New*York, 119 App. Div. 755, appeal dismissed.

(Argued December 5, 1907;

decided December 17, 1907.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered May 17, 1907, which reversed a judgment of the Court of Claims dismissing a claim against the state for services alleged to have been rendered by the claimant.

*William 8.*Jackson, *Attorney-General (Timothy 1. Dillon*of counsel), for appellant.

*Myer*Nussbaum, respondent, in person.

*George H. Stevens*and *William J. jRoche*for Oliver A. Quayle, intervening.

. Appeal dismissed, without costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., O’Brien, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Yann, Hiscock and Chase, JJ.
EXHIBIT 99(b)

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, I, Jane Morlok, Chief Financial
Officer and Co-Chief Executive Officer of Breda Telephone Corp., hereby certify
that to my knowledge (i) Breda Telephone Corp.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Breda
Telephone Corp.

Date: May 14, 2003.


                                       /s/ Jane Morlok
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Jane Morlok, Chief Financial Officer
                                       and Co-Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to Breda Telephone
Corp. and will be retained by Breda Telephone Corp. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                       E-2
# Final Action On Regulations

Title 10 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND MENTAL HYGIENE
**Subtitle 10 LABORATORIES**
Notice of Final Action [09-114-F]On May 12, 2009, the Secretary of Health and Mental Hygiene adopted amendments to: (1) Regulations .02 — .04 under COMAR 10.10.01 General; (2) Regulations .01 — .03 under COMAR 10.10.02 Medical Laboratories — General; (3) Regulations .01 — .04 and adopted new Regulations .05 — .06 under COMAR 10.10.03 Medical Laboratories — Licenses; (4) Regulations .01 — .03 under COMAR 10.10.04 Medical Laboratories — Fees; (5) Regulations .01 — .05 under COMAR 10.10.05 Medical Laboratories — Proficiency Testing; (6) Regulations .01 — .05 , .07 , .08 , .10 , and .14 — .16 , repealed existing Regulation .09 , and adopted new Regulation .05-1 under COMAR 10.10.06 Medical Laboratories Quality Assurance (QA) ; (7) Regulations .01 , .03 , and .05 under COMAR 10.10.07 Medical Laboratories — Personnel; and (8) Regulations .01 , .02 , and .04 under COMAR 10.10.08 Medical Laboratories — Sanctions

.

This action, which was proposed for adoption in 36:7 Md. R. 530 — 542 (March 27, 2009), has been adopted as proposed.

Effective Date: June 1, 2009. JOHN M. COLMERS Secretary of Health and Mental Hygiene 

# Title 26 DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT

**Subtitle 11 AIR QUALITY 26.11.35 Volatile Organic Compounds from**  **Adhesives and Sealants**

Authority: Environment Article, §§1-101, 1-404, 2-101 — 2-103, 2-301 — 2-303, 10-102, and 10-203, Annotated Code of Maryland Notice of Final Action [09-094-F] On April 29, 2009, the Secretary of the Environment adopted amendments to Regulation .01 under COMAR 26.11.35 Volatile Organic Compounds from Adhesives and Sealants . This action, which was proposed for adoption in 36:4 Md. R. 362 — 363 (February 13, 2009), has been adopted as proposed.

Effective Date: June 1, 2009. SHARI T. WILSON Secretary of the Environment


# Title 31 MARYLAND INSURANCE ADMINISTRATION **Subtitle 05 ASSETS, LIABILITIES, RESERVES, AND INVESTMENTS OF INSURERS** **31.05.01 Annual Actuarial Opinion and Memo randum** 
Authority: Insurance Article, §§2-109(a)(1), 4-116, 5-103, 5-201, 8-444, and 14-121, Annotated Code of Maryland Notice of Final Action [09-100-F] On April 22, 2009, the Insurance Commissioner adopted the repeal of existing Regulations .01 — .10 , and new Regulations .01 — .07 under COMAR 31.05.01 Annual Actuarial Opinion and Memorandum . This action, which was proposed for adoption in 36:5 Md. R. 430 — 444 (February 27, 2009), has been adopted with the nonsubstantive changes shown below.

Effective Date: June 1, 2009. **787**

Symbol Key

• Roman type indicates text already existing at the time of the proposed action.

• Italic type indicates new text added at the time of proposed action.

• Single underline, italic indicates new text added at the time of final action.

• Single underline, roman indicates existing text added at the time of final action.

• **[[**Double brackets**]]** indicate text deleted at the time of final action.

**MARYLAND REGISTER, VOL. 36, ISSUE 11 FRIDAY, MAY 22, 2009**
CERTIFICATION



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, the undersigned officer of Solpower Corporation
(the "Company") hereby certifies that the Company's Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.


Date:  August 26, 2005         By: /s/ James H. Hirst
                                    ---------------------
                                   James H. Hirst
                                   President, Chief Executive Officer,
                                   Principal Accounting Officer and Director
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          47,816
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,700,987
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     91,445
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,840,248
<PP&E>                                         238,683
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,641,686
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,459
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       233,916
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,560,904
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,641,686
<SALES>                                         45,307
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                45,307
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,054,875
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (2,189)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 925
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,008,304)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,008,304)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,008,304)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Defense Intelligence Agency Joint Military Intelligence College.

# ACTION:

Notice of Closed Meeting.

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the provisions of Subsection (d) of Section 10 of Public Law 92-463, as amended by Section 5 of Public Law 94-409, notice is hereby given that a closed meeting of the DIA Joint Military Intelligence College Board of Visitors has been scheduled as follows:

# DATES:

Tuesday, 3 January 2006, 0800 to 1700; and Wednesday, 4 January 2006, 0800 to 1200.

# ADDRESSES:

Joint Military Intelligence College, Washington, DC 20340-5100.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mr. A. Denis Clift, President, DIA Joint Military Intelligence College, Washington, DC 20340-5100 (202/231-3344).

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The entire meeting is devoted to the discussion of classified information as defined in Section 552b(c)(1), Title 5 of the U.S. Code and therefore will be closed. The Board will discuss several current critical intelligence issues and advise the Director, DIA, as to the successful accomplishment of the mission assigned to the Joint Military Intelligence College.

Dated: November 15, 2006.

L.M. Bynum,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, DoD.

[FR Doc. 06-9295 Filed 11-21-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-M
Editorial Note on Part 1303
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1303 appear at 89 FR 67816, Aug. 21, 2024.

§ 1303.55 Procurement procedures. ( a ) A grant recipient must comply with all grants management regulations, including specific regulations applicable to transactions in excess of the current simplified acquisition threshold, cost principles, and its own procurement procedures, and must provide, to the maximum extent practical, open and full competition.
( b ) A grant recipient must obtain the responsible HHS official's written approval before it uses Head Start funds, in whole or in part, to contract construction or renovation services. The grant recipient must ensure these contracts are paid on a lump sum fixed-price basis.
( c ) A grant recipient must obtain prior written approval from the responsible HHS official for contract modifications that would change the scope or objective of a project or would materially alter the costs, by increasing the amount of grant funds needed to complete the project.
( d ) A grant recipient must ensure all construction and renovation contracts paid, in whole or in part with Head Start funds contain a clause that gives the responsible HHS official or his or her designee access to the facility, at all reasonable times, during construction and inspection.
EXHIBIT
        32.1
  **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
  In
        connection with the Annual Report of Freedom7, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
        10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
        and
        Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Virginia K. Sourlis,
        certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
        906
        of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and
        belief:
 
 1.  The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.  The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Dated:
                  March 5, 2008
              By:
              /s/ Virginia
                  K. SourlisVirginia
                  K. SourlisPrincipal
                  Executive Officer
                Principal
                  Financial Officer
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I,
David G. Hanna, certify that:

1.     I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q/A of CompuCredit Corporation;

2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4.     The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:



5.     The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



|Date: November 3, 2003 |  |                                                                                  
|---------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                       |  | /s/DAVID G. HANNADavid G. Hanna Chief Executive Officer and
Chairman of the Board

---

QuickLinks
§ 1171.8 Responses to requests. ( a ) *Acknowledgment of requests.* Upon receipt of a request that will take longer than ten (10) days to process, the NEH will send the requester an acknowledgment letter that assigns the request an individualized tracking number.
( b ) *Grants of requests.* If the NEH makes a determination to grant a request in whole or in part, it will notify the requester in writing of such determination and the reasons therefore, and the requester's right to seek assistance from NEH's FOIA Public Liaison. The NEH will inform the requester of any applicable fees and will disclose records to the requester promptly on payment of any applicable fees. The NEH will mark or annotate records disclosed in part to show the amount of information deleted pursuant to a FOIA exemption, unless doing so would harm an interest protected by an applicable FOIA exemption. If technically feasible, the NEH will also indicate, on the agency record(s) it provides, the location of the information deleted.
( c ) *Denials of requests.* If the NEH makes a determination to deny a request in any respect, the NEH will also notify the requester in writing of: ( 1 ) The name and title or position of the person responsible for the denial;
( 2 ) A brief statement of the reason(s) for the denial, including any FOIA exemption applied by the NEH in denying the request;
( 3 ) An estimate of the volume of records or information withheld, if applicable, although such an estimate is not required if the volume is otherwise indicated through deletion on the records disclosed in part, or if providing such an estimate would harm an interest protected by an applicable exemption;
( 4 ) The requester's right to seek dispute resolution services from NEH's FOIA Public Liaison or the Office of Government Information Services; and
( 5 ) A statement that the requester may appeal the denial under § 1171.10 and a description of the requirements to appeal.
[79 FR 9415, Feb. 19, 2014, as amended at 82 FR 45, Jan. 3, 2017]
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SABINO VELASQUEZ-GONZALEZ,

a.k.a. Sabino Montiel-Velasquez,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 07-75092

Agency No. A077-343-295

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 25, 2010** 

Before: CANBY, THOMAS, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges. 

Sabino Velasquez-Gonzalez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to

reopen based on ineffective assistance of counsel. Our jurisdiction is governed by

8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to

FILED

JUN 07 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 07-75092

reopen, and review de novo questions of law, including claims of due process

violations due to ineffective assistance of counsel. Mohammed v. Gonzales, 400

F.3d 785, 791-92 (9th Cir. 2005). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition

for review. 

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Velasquez-Gonzalez’s

motion to reopen because the motion was filed over a year after the BIA’s March

20, 2006, order dismissing his underlying appeal, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2), and

Velasquez-Gonzalez failed to demonstrate that he acted with the due diligence

required for equitable tolling, see Iturribarria v. INS, 321 F.3d 889, 897 (9th Cir.

2003) (equitable tolling available “when a petitioner is prevented from filing

because of deception, fraud, or error, as long as the petitioner acts with due

diligence”).

We lack jurisdiction to review Velasquez-Gonzalez’s contention that he is

eligible for asylum and his request to withdraw his application for voluntary

departure because he failed to exhaust these claims before the BIA. See Barron v.

Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir. 2004).

We reject Velasquez-Gonzalez’s remaining contentions. 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
**Pump**

**Type Pump Type**  **(ANSI/HI) NEMA BIS** 

**Estim ated**  **Shipm ents**  **Estim ated** 

**Shipm ents**  **Operating Shipment** 

**Weighted**

**Shaft HP at**

**BEP Connected**  **Load (kW) Average** 

**Percent**
**Power**
**Draw Estim**  **ated**

**Hours of Operation** 
**A**

**ESCC OH7**  171,456 8 1,061,621 74% 1,913

**ESFM OH0/OH1**  44,042 19 624,251 74% 2,188

**IL OH3/OH4/OH5**  50,424 10 376,163 74% 2,000

**RS-V VS8**  49,975 6 223,688 74% 2,823

**VT-S VS0**  104,406 16 1,246,190 74% 1,500

**DS BB1/OH4**  5,311 80 316,960 74% 2,000

**AS BB1/BB3**  277 70 14,465 74% 3,224

**RS-H BB2/BB4**  2,874

- 74% 2,823

**VT VS1/VS2**  5,815 25 108,450 74% 750



### IL and DS hours of operation should be similar to End Suction because they are substitutes Often sold in pairs (75% of the time - HVAC, municipal, pressure booster), so that 50% are not operating - lead and lag Operation hours are less than what a typical worker works - Why? 2,000 hours for ESCC and ESFM is probably pretty accurate Commercial buildings have hours of operation through 90.1 PNNL models - pull out schedules Operating hours are tied to lifetime, but in some applications, fewer hours are worse VT operating hours may be too high because mostly ag; may not run 400 hours a year Doug sees decline in efficiency of 1% every year due to wear and tear **Lot 11**

**Lot 11+**

TOTAL Lot 11

TOTAL Lot 11+

### Lifetime 20

**Estim ated** 
**Hours of Operation** 

**B Annual**  **Energy**
**Use A (TWh)**  **Annual**

**Energy**
**Use B (TWh)**  **Min Max**  **Min Energy**  **Savings (TWh)**  **Max**

**Energy Savings**  **(TWh) Quads** 

**over 30 years of**  **Shipm ents -** 
**Min Quads** 

**over 30 years of**  **Shipm ents -** 
**Max**
2,250 1.50 1.77 1.5% 4.3% 0.02 0.08 0.12 0.39
2,250 1.01 1.04 1.0% 2.7% 0.01 0.03 0.05 0.14
4,000 0.56 1.11 2.5% 4.1% 0.01 0.05 0.07 0.23
1,500 0.47 0.25 1.4% 6.5% 0.003 0.016 0.02 0.08

1,000 1.38 0.92 2.3% 5.4% 0.02 0.07 0.11 0.38

0.47 0.8% 1.8% 0.004 0.01 0.02 0.04

0.03 1.6% 3.0% 0.0006 0.0010 0.003 0.005

- - - - - 1,699 0.06 0.14 0.1% 0.4% 0.0001 0.0002 0.0003 0.0012

4.92 5.09 0.07 0.24 0.37 1.23

0.56 0.64 0.004 0.01 0.02 0.05



### Often sold in pairs (75% of the time - HVAC, municipal, pressure booster), so that 50% are not operating - lead and lag **Energy Savings Estimate (%) - MEI 40**
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of MetroCorp Bancshares, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Allen
D. Brown, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.     The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and operating results of the
Company.

|                                             |  | 
|-------------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/ ALLEN D. BROWN

Allen D. Brown
President |  |