alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
 
            EXHIBIT (15) LETTER RE: UNAUDITED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
 
Board of Directors and Shareholders
Park-Ohio Industries, Inc.
 
     We are aware of the incorporation by reference in the following
Registration Statements of Park-Ohio Industries, Inc., for the registration of
its senior subordinated notes due 2007 of our report dated July 22, 1998
relating to the unaudited consolidated interim financial statements of Park-Ohio
Industries, Inc., which are included in its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June
30, 1998:
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                              SHARES/DOLLARS
REGISTRATION STATEMENT                      DESCRIPTION                         REGISTERED
----------------------                      -----------                       --------------
<S>                     <C>                                                   <C>
Form S-4 (333-43005)    Senior Subordinated Notes due 2007                     $150,000,000
</TABLE>
 
     Pursuant to Rule 436(c) of the Securities Act of 1933 our reports are not a
part of the registration statement prepared or certified by accountants within
the meaning of Section 7 or 11 of the Securities Act of 1933.
 
                                          /s/  Ernst & Young LLP
 
Cleveland, Ohio
August 7, 1998
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           4,252
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  113,090
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,101
<INVENTORY>                                    124,536
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               251,609
<PP&E>                                          69,060
<DEPRECIATION>                                  17,212
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 419,046
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          208,106
<BONDS>                                        110,666
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           11,500
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            51
<OTHER-SE>                                      19,364
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   419,046
<SALES>                                        245,272
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               245,272
<CGS>                                          186,452
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  191,904
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                48,576
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,042
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    677
<INCOME-TAX>                                       267
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                410
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       410
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.05
        

</TABLE>
### TEXA S COU RT O F AP PEAL S, THIRD DISTRICT , AT AUST IN

NO. 03-00-00238-CR

Corey Wa

yne Sedwic k, Appellant
v. The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE

DISTRICT CO URT OF WILLIAM SON COUNT Y, 277TH JUDICIAL

DISTRICT NO. 99-974-K277, HONORAB LE MICHAE L JE RGINS, JUDGE PRESIDING

A jury found appellant C orey Wayne Sedwick guilty of posses sin g cocaine and tampering with physi cal e vidence. Tex. Health

& Safety Co de An

n. § 481.112(a), (c ) (West Supp. 2000); Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 37. 09 (West Supp. 2000). The jury assessed punishment for these offenses, enhanced b y a previous felony conviction, at imprisonment for terms of seventy-f ive and fi fteen year s. Appe llant ’s court-appointed a tto rney filed a brief conc luding tha t the appe al is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements o f Ander s v. Califor

nia , 386 U. S. 738 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the recor d demonstrating why there ar e no arguable grounds to be advanced. See also Penson v. Ohio , 488 U. S. 75 (19 88); High v. State , 573 S. W. 2d

807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978) ; Curr ie v. State , 516 S. W. 2d 684 (Tex. Cri m. App. 1974) ; Jackson v. State , 485 S
. W. 2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972) ; Gainous v. State , 436 S. W. 2d2

137 (Tex. Cri m. App. 1969). A copy of counsel’s brief was delivered to appellant, and appellant
was advise d of his rig

ht toex amin e t

he ap pe ll ate re cord a

nd tofi le a pro s e brie f. No pro

se brief has been filed. We have reviewe d t he record and couns el’s brief and a gree that the a

ppeal is frivolous and withou t m eri t. We find nothing in the recor d that might arguably suppor t the appeal. The judgment of conviction is affir med.

Marilyn Aboussie, Chief Justice B efore Chief

Justice Abouss ie, Justices B
. A. Smith and Patterson Affirm ed F iled: November 2, 2000 Do N ot Pu blish
#### § 1172.35 Prohibition against intimidation or retaliation.

A recipient may not engage in acts of intimidation or retaliation against any person who attempts to assert a right protected by the Act or this part, or cooperates in any mediation, investigation, hearing, or other part of NEH's investigation, conciliation, and enforcement process.
§ 156.1210 Dispute submission. ( a ) *Responses to reports.* Within 90 calendar days of the date of a payment and collections report from HHS, the issuer must, in a form and manner specified by HHS or the State Exchange describe to HHS or the State Exchange (as applicable) any inaccuracies it identifies in the report.
( b ) *Inaccuracies identified after 90-day period.* With respect to an inaccuracy described under paragraph (a) of this section that is identified and submitted to HHS or the State Exchange (as applicable) by the issuer after the end of the 90-day period described in such paragraph, HHS will consider and work with the issuer or the State Exchange (as applicable) to resolve the inaccuracy so long as— ( 1 ) The issuer promptly notifies HHS or the State Exchange (as applicable) upon identifying the inaccuracy, but in no case later than 15 calendar days after identifying the inaccuracy; and
( 2 ) The failure to identify the inaccuracy and submit it to HHS or the State Exchange (as applicable) in a timely manner was not unreasonable or due to the issuer's misconduct or negligence.
( c ) *Deadline for describing inaccuracies.* To be eligible for resolution under paragraph (b) of this section, an issuer must describe all inaccuracies identified in a payment and collections report before the end of the 3-year period beginning at the end of the plan year to which the inaccuracy relates. For plan years 2015 through 2019, to be eligible for resolution under paragraph (b) of this section, an issuer must describe all inaccuracies identified in a payment and collections report before January 1, 2024. If a payment error is discovered after the timeframe set forth in this paragraph (c), the issuer must notify HHS, the State Exchange, or State-based Exchanges on the Federal platform (SBE-FP) (as applicable) and repay any overpayments to HHS.
( d ) *Confirmation of HHS payment and collections reports.* At the end of each payment year, the issuer must, in a form and manner specified by HHS, confirm to HHS that the amounts identified in the most recent payment and collections report for the coverage year accurately reflect applicable payments owed by the issuer to the Federal Government and the payments owed to the issuer by the Federal Government, or that the issuer has disputed any identified inaccuracies.
[85 FR 29262, May 14, 2020, as amended at 86 FR 24294, May 5, 2021; 88 FR 25923, Apr. 27, 2023]
## MA**TERIA LS NOT INCLUDED IN** 

**AI RWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE (A**  **D) DOCKET**

**FAA -**  **2012 -**  **0602** Docket Number
**2009 -**  **SW -**  **061 -**  **AD** Directorate Identifier Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in DMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket Schweizer Service Bulletin DB - 018.3, dated December 13, 2007


### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Office of the Regional Counsel, Southwest Region Rules Docket 2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663 Fort W orth, Texas 76137 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p .m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
```

[House Report 106-887]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

106th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 2d Session                                                     106-887

======================================================================

 
   PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION 109, MAKING 
             CONTINUING APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2001

                                _______
                                

 September 25, 2000.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

                                _______
                                

    Mr. Linder, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 591]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 591, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

                  summary of provisions of resolution

    The resolution provides for consideration in the House of 
House Joint Resolution 109, Making Continuing Appropriations 
for Fiscal Year 2001. The rule waives all points of order 
against consideration of the joint resolution. The rule also 
provides one hour of debate equally divided and controlled by 
the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on 
Appropriations. Finally, the rule provides one motion to 
recommit.

                                  

```
##### 



Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

Michael V. Shustek, as Chief Executive Officer of Vestin Group, Inc. (the
Company), and John Alderfer, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, that

(1) the Companys Quarterly Report of Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report) fully complies with the applicable
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: November 14, 2003
    
    /s/ Michael V. Shustek

Michael V. Shustek
Chief Executive Officer of
Vestin Group, Inc.Dated: November 14, 2003
    
    /s/ John W. Alderfer

John W. Alderfer
Chief Financial Officer of
Vestin Group, Inc.
#### § 13.930 Do I need a permit to operate a motor vehicle on the Denali Park road west of the Savage River?

Yes, you must obtain a permit from the superintendent to operate a motor vehicle on the restricted section of the Denali Park road. The restricted section begins at the west end of the Savage River Bridge (mile 14.8) and continues to the former Mt. McKinley National Park boundary north of Wonder Lake (mile 87.9).
# EUR-Lex - 12008E338 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008E338

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - PART SEVEN: GENERAL AND FINAL PROVISIONS - Article 338 (ex Article 285 TEC) **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0192 - 0192 *

Article 338

(ex Article 285 TEC)

1. Without prejudice to Article 5 of the Protocol on the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank, the European Parliament and the Council, acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure, shall adopt measures for the production of statistics where necessary for the performance of the activities of the Union.

2. The production of Union statistics shall conform to impartiality, reliability, objectivity, scientific independence, cost-effectiveness and statistical confidentiality; it shall not entail excessive burdens on economic operators.

--------------------------------------------------
#### Charles F. Perry *vs.*Vermont Farm Machine Co.

January Term, 1898.

Present: Taft, Rowell, Tyler, Munson, Start and Thompson, JJ.

*Evidence*— Rebuttal.

The question was whether the defendant’s machine, in operating which the plaintiff was injured, was defective at the time of the accident, some eight years before the trial. The plaintiff’s evidence tended to show that it was; the defendant’s, that it was not, and further, that it was still in the same condition and still worked properly; and the machine was produced in court as a part of the defendant’s case. *Held,*that the plaintiff was entitled to show in rebuttal that it still worked imperfectly in the respect complained of.

Case. Plea, the general issue. Trial by jury at the September Term, 1897, Windham County, *Ross,*C. J., *277presiding. Verdict and judgment for the plaintiff. The defendant excepted.

*L. M. Read*for the defendant.

*C. H. Robb*and Waterman, *Marhn & Httt*for the plaintiff.

Taft, J.

The plaintiffs testimony in the opening tended to show, that in September, 1889, he was injured while operating a power press used by the defendant in stamping pieces of iron, and further tended to show that when the press was in operation, on mowing the foot from the pedal of the press, the pulley pin would not be withdrawn readily, and the press would not stop, but continue to operate, and it was this continued operation that caused his injury. The defendant introduced testimony tending to show that no changes had been made in the press since the accident, eight years before the trial, and that at the time of the trial, the machine operated just as it did at the time of the accident, and that on remowing the foot from the pedal, the pin would be at once withdrawn and the stamp cease to operate, and that the machine newer failed to work properly; and at the close of its ewidence the machine was put into the case by the defendant.

The plaintiff was then permitted, under exception, to show in rebuttal, that on the daw of the trial, the press would not work properly; that the die would not stop when the foot was taken off the pedal, which was the claimed defectiwe action.

The only question in the case is, whether this testimony was proper rebutting testimony. The testimony of the defendant tended to show that the press on the day of the trial worked properly and was in good repair. The machine was exhibited in the court room and operated by the defendant. The plaintiff was then entitled to show in rebuttal that it would not operate properly on the day of the trial. It does not appear that the plaintiff gawe any testimony in the opening of his cause as to the condition of *278the press at the time of the trial; the introduction of such testimony by the defendant gave the plaintiff the right to rebut it by testimony to show that the press was then out of repair and would not work properly. This testimony in rebuttal was made material by the testimony which the defendant introduced. There was no error in admitting it and

*The judgment is affirmed.*
§ 1184.1 What are the purpose and scope of this part? ( a ) This part describe how the Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS) processes requests for records under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552 as amended. The regulations in this part apply only to records that are both: ( 1 ) Created or obtained by IMLS; and
( 2 ) Under the agency's control at the time of the FOIA request.
( b ) The rules in this part should be read in conjunction with the text of the FOIA and the Uniform Freedom of Information Fee Act Schedule and Guidelines published by the Office of Management and Budget (the “OMB Guidelines”). Requests made by individuals for records about themselves under the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a, are processed under 45 CFR part 1182 as well as under this part.
[84 FR 22945, May 21, 2019]
CERTIFICATIONS
EX-31.1   CERTIFICATIONS OF CEO PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

I, Ronald J. Chapman, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of ASI Entertainment,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: February 12, 2007

/s/ Ronald J. Chapman

Ronald J. Chapman
Chief Executive Officer

                                     - 1 -
<PAGE>
CERTIFICATIONS OF CFO PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

Exhibit 31.2

                            CERTIFICATIONS

I, Bruce A. Hall, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Knight Energy
Corp. (the "Registrant");

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the consolidated financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the consolidated financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;

4. The Registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant
and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's
most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the
case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over
financial reporting; and

5. The Registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the Registrant's independent registered public accounting
firm and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or
persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.

August 13, 2007

/s/ Bruce A. Hall
------------------------------
Bruce A. Hall
Principal Financial Officer
#### § 158.102 Applicability.

*General requirements.* The requirements of this part apply to issuers offering group or individual health insurance coverage, including a grandfathered health plan as defined in § 147.140 of this subpart.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 1 1 , 2016 

# Order

Clerk March 1 1 , 2016

15 1619

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

SC: 15 1619

v COA: 316332

Gogebic CC: 2012

- 000215

- FC

KENNETH WAYNE PETERS

, Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the C hief Justice , the application for leave to appeal is DISMISSED in

light of the certified copy of the certificate of defendant

- appellant’s death being filed with

the clerk of the Court

. See People v Posby , 459 Mich 21, 22 (1998); People v Peters , 449

Mich 515, 521

- 522 (1995); People v Weston

, 348 NW2d 262 (1984)

.