alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 158.602 Basis for imposing civil penalties. *Civil penalties.* For the violations listed in this paragraph, HHS may impose civil penalties in the amounts specified in § 158.606 of this subpart on any issuer who fails to do the following: ( a ) Submit to HHS a report concerning the data required under this part by the deadline established by HHS.
( b ) Submit to HHS a substantially complete or accurate report concerning the data required under this part.
( c ) Timely and accurately pay rebates owing pursuant to this part.
( d ) Respond to HHS inquiries as part of an investigation of issuer non-compliance.
( e ) Maintain records as required under this part for the periodic auditing of books and records used in compiling data reported to HHS and in calculating and paying rebates pursuant to this part.
( f ) Allow access and entry to premises, facilities and records that pertain to any aspect of the data reported to HHS or to rebates calculated and paid pursuant to this part.
( g ) Comply with corrective actions resulting from audit findings.
( h ) Accurately and truthfully represent data, reports or other information that it furnishes to a State or HHS.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 117 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 566
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. J. RES. 117

 Relating to the disapproval of the Presidential report with respect to 
             the indebtedness of the Government of Ukraine.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 19, 2024

  Mr. Paul introduced the following joint resolution; which was read 
    twice and placed on the calendar pursuant to P.L. 118-50, Sec. 
                               508(e)(1)

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
 Relating to the disapproval of the Presidential report with respect to 
             the indebtedness of the Government of Ukraine.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
proposal relating to the indebtedness of the Government of Ukraine 
submitted by the President of the United States to Congress on November 
18, 2024.

                                                       Calendar No. 566

118th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                             S. J. RES. 117

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 Relating to the disapproval of the Presidential report with respect to 
             the indebtedness of the Government of Ukraine.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           November 19, 2024

                 Read twice and placed on the calendar
```
§ 228.105 Issuance of onshore orders and notices to lessees. ( a ) *Onshore oil and gas orders.* The Chief of the Forest Service may issue, or cosign with the Director, Bureau of Land Management, Onshore Oil and Gas Orders necessary to implement and supplement the regulations of this subpart. ( 1 ) *Surface Use Plans of Operations and Master Development Plans.* Operators shall submit Surface Use Plans of Operations or Master Development Plans in accordance with Onshore Oil and Gas Order No. 1. Approval of a Master Development Plan constitutes a decision to approve Surface Use Plans of Operations submitted as a part of the Master Development Plan. Subsequently submitted Surface Use Plans of Operations shall be reviewed to verify that they are consistent with the approved Master Development Plan and whether additional NEPA documentation or consultation pursuant to the National Historic Preservation Act or the Endangered Species Act is required. If the review determines that additional documentation is required, the Forest Service will review the additional documentation or consult as appropriate and make an independent decision regarding the subsequently submitted Surface Use Plan of Operations, and notify the BLM and the operator whether the Surface Use Plan of Operations is approved.
( 2 ) *Adoption of additional onshore oil and gas orders.* Additional onshore oil and gas orders shall be published in the Federal Register for public comment and codified in the CFR.
( 3 ) *Applicability of onshore oil and gas orders.* Onshore Oil and Gas Orders issued pursuant to this section are binding on all operations conducted on National Forest System lands, unless otherwise provided therein.
( b ) *Notices to lessees, transferees, and operators.* The authorized Forest officer may issue, or cosign with the authorized officer of the Bureau of Land Management, Notices to Lessees, Transferees, and Operators necessary to implement the regulations of this subpart. Notices to Lessees, Transferees, and Operators are binding on all operations conducted on the administrative unit of the National Forest System (36 CFR 200.2) supervised by the authorized Forest officer who issued or cosigned such notice.
[55 FR 10444, Mar. 21, 1990, as amended at 72 FR 10328, Mar. 7, 2007]
EX:C

Case 16-29209 Doc 22-7 Filed 01/18/17 Entered 01/18/17 13:32:56 Desc Exhibit

AOM Page 1 of 3
Case 16-29209 Doc 22-7 Filed 01/18/17 Entered 01/18/17 13:32:56 Desc Exhibit

AOM Page 2 of 3
Case 16-29209 Doc 22-7 Filed 01/18/17 Entered 01/18/17 13:32:56 Desc Exhibit

AOM Page 3 of 3
§ 1641.6 Procedures for debarment. Before debarring an IPA, the OIG shall provide the IPA with a hearing in accordance with the procedures set out in §§ 1641.7 through 1641.9. Such hearing shall be held entirely by written submissions, except: ( a ) Additional proceedings shall be held under § 1641.10 if the debarring official finds there is a genuine dispute of material fact; and/or
( b ) A meeting may be held under § 1641.9(c).
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 217 (Thursday, November 9, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 65835]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9164]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[USITC SE-06-057]


Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

Agency Holding the Meeting: United States International Trade 
Commission.

Time and Date: November 15, 2006 at 11 a.m.

Place: Room 101, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: 
(202) 205-2000.

Status: Open to the public.

Matters to be Considered:
    1. Agenda for future meetings: none.
    2. Minutes.
    3. Ratification List.
    4. Inv. Nos. 731-TA-471 and 472 (Second Review) (Silicon Metal from 
Brazil and China)--briefing and vote. (The Commission is currently 
scheduled to transmit its determination and Commissioners' opinions to 
the Secretary of Commerce on or before December 6, 2006.)
    5. Outstanding action jackets: none.
    In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, 
not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the 
agenda of the following meeting.

    Issued: November 6, 2006.

    By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 06-9164 Filed 11-7-06; 10:57 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications

  I, John A. Vella, certify that:

  1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K/A and all reports on Form 10-D
     required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report
     on Form 10-K/A of Bear Stearns Mortgage Funding Trust 2006-AR1 (the
     "Exchange Act periodic reports");

  2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
     whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
     to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
     light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
     misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
     information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
     covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
     reports;

  4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required
     in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
     disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have
     fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material
     respects; and

  5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
     criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation
     reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
     asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in
     accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
     13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report,
     except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances
     of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in
     this report on Form 10-K/A.

     In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
     information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
     Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Trustee.

     Dated: July 14, 2008

     /s/ John A. Vella
     Signature

     President and CEO
     (senior officer in charge of the servicing function of the servicer)
§ 1326.112 Effective date of decision by the Secretary. ( a ) If, in the case of a hearing pursuant to section 124 of the Act, the Secretary, or his or her designee, concludes that a State plan does not comply with Federal requirements, and the decision provides that the payment or allotment will be authorized but limited to parts of the State plan not affected by such noncompliance, the decision must specify the effective date for the authorization of the payment or allotment.
( b ) In the case of a hearing pursuant to sections 127 or 143 of the Act, if the Secretary, or his or her designee, concludes that the State is not complying with the requirements of the State plan or if the activities of the State's Protection and Advocacy System do not comply with Federal requirements, the decision that further payments or allotments will not be made to the State, or will be limited to the parts of the State plan or activities of the State Protection and Advocacy System not affected, must specify the effective date for withholding payments or allotments.
( c ) The effective date may not be earlier than the date of the decision of the Secretary, or his or her designee, and may not be later than the first day of the next calendar quarter.
( d ) The provision of this section may not be waived pursuant to § 1326.84.
[80 FR 44807, July 27, 2015, as amended at 85 FR 72911, Nov. 16, 2020]
§ 16.3 When these procedures become available. Before the Board will take an appeal, three circumstances must be present: ( a ) The dispute must arise under a program which uses the Board for dispute resolution, and must meet any special conditions established for that program. An explanation is contained in appendix A.
( b ) The appellant must have received a final written decision, and must appeal that decision within 30 days after receiving it. Details of how final decisions are developed and issued, and what must be in them, are contained in 45 CFR 75.374.
( c ) The appellant must have exhausted any preliminary appeal process required by regulation. For example, see 42 CFR part 50 (subpart D) for Public Health Service programs. In such cases, the *final written decision* required for the Board's review is the decision resulting from the preliminary review or appeal process. appendix A contains further details.
[46 FR 43817, Aug. 31, 1981, as amended at 62 FR 38218, July 17, 1997; 81 FR 3012, Jan. 20, 2016]
Editorial Note on Part 1304
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1304 appear at 89 FR 67817, Aug. 21, 2024.

§ 1304.2 Monitoring. ( a ) *Areas of noncompliance.* If a responsible HHS official determines through monitoring, pursuant to section 641(A)(c)(1) and (2) of the Act, that a grant recipient fails to comply with any of the standards described in parts 1301, 1302, and 1303 of this chapter, the official will notify the grant recipient promptly in writing, identify the area of noncompliance, and specify when the grant recipient must correct the area of noncompliance.
( b ) *Deficiencies.* If the Secretary determines that a grant recipient meets one of the criteria for a deficiency, as defined in section 637(2)(C) of the Act, the Secretary shall inform the grant recipient of the deficiency. The grant recipient must correct the deficiency pursuant to section 641A(e)(1)(B) of the Act, as the responsible HHS official determines.
( c ) *Quality improvement plans.* If the responsible HHS official does not require the grant recipient to correct a deficiency immediately as prescribed under section 641A(e)(1)(B)(i) of the Act, the grant recipient must submit to the official, for approval, a quality improvement plan that adheres to section 641A(e)(2)(A) of the Act.
SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

ONE HUNDRED EIGHTH CONGRESS

FIRST SESSION { CONVENED JANUARY 7, 2003

SECOND SESSION {

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR

Thursday, February 6, 2003

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF EMILY J. REYNOLDS,

SECRETARY OF THE SENATE

By Michelle Haynes, Executive Clerk

Issue No. 11
UNANIMOUS CONSENT AGREEMENT

Ordered, That on Thursday, February 6, 2003, the Senate return to executive session to resume consideration of

the nomination of Miguel A. Estrada, of Virginia, to be United States Circuit Judge for the District of Columbia

Circuit. (Cal. No. 21)

(February 5, 2003)
CALENDAR

NO.

EX.RES

NO. SUBJECT

REPORTED

BY

RESOLUTIONS

1
CALENDAR

NO.

TREATY

DOC. NO. SUBJECT

REPORTED

BY

TREATIES

2
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH

REVIEW COMMISSION

* 17 81 Stanley C. Suboleski, of Virginia, to be a Member

of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review

Commission for a term of six years expiring

August 30, 2006, vice Marc Lincoln Marks,

term expired.

Jan 23, 2003 Reported by Mr.

Gregg, Committee on Health,

Education, Labor, and Pensions,

without printed report.

OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH

REVIEW COMMISSION

* 18 82 W. Scott Railton, of Virginia, to be a Member of

the Occupational Safety and Health Review

Commission for a term expiring April 27, 2007,

vice Gary L. Visscher, term expired.

Jan 23, 2003 Reported by Mr.

Gregg, Committee on Health,

Education, Labor, and Pensions,

without printed report.

THE JUDICIARY

21 6 Miguel A. Estrada, of Virginia, to be United

States Circuit Judge for the District of

Columbia Circuit, vice Patricia M. Wald,

retired.

Jan 30, 2003 Reported by Mr.

Hatch, Committee on the

Judiciary, without printed report.

* Signifies nominee’s commitment to respond to requests to appear and testify before any duly constituted committee of the Senate

NOMINATIONS

CALENDAR

NO.

MESSAGE

NO. NOMINEE, OFFICE, AND PREDECESSOR

REPORTED

BY

3
FOREIGN SERVICE

PN199 Foreign Service nominations (157) beginning Russell J. Nicely, and ending George Adams Moore, Jr.,

which nominations were received by the Senate and appeared in the Congressional Record of January 15, 2003

PN200 Foreign Service nominations (243) beginning Nicholas R. Kuchova, and ending Richard W. Johnston,

which nominations were received by the Senate and appeared in the Congressional Record of January 15, 2003

NOMINATIONS PLACED ON THE SECRETARY’S DESK

4
§ 1149.17 How do you respond to the complaint? ( a ) You may respond to the complaint by filing an answer with the reviewing official within 30 days of service of the complaint. A timely answer will be considered a request for an oral hearing.
( b ) In the answer, you— ( 1 ) Must admit or deny each of the allegations of liability contained in the complaint (a failure to deny an allegation is considered an admission);
( 2 ) Must state any defense on which you intend to rely;
( 3 ) May state any reasons why you believe the penalties, assessments, or both should be less than the statutory maximum; and
( 4 ) Must state the name, address, and telephone number of the person authorized by you to act as your representative, if any.
#### § 162.402 [Reserved]
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 34 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. CON. RES. 34

Establishing the Joint Congressional Committee on Inaugural Ceremonies 
for the inauguration of the President-elect and Vice President-elect of 
                 the United States on January 20, 2025.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 2, 2024

Ms. Klobuchar submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
                        considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Establishing the Joint Congressional Committee on Inaugural Ceremonies 
for the inauguration of the President-elect and Vice President-elect of 
                 the United States on January 20, 2025.

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring),

SECTION 1. ESTABLISHMENT OF JOINT COMMITTEE.

    There is established a Joint Congressional Committee on Inaugural 
Ceremonies (in this resolution referred to as the ``joint committee'') 
consisting of 3 Senators and 3 Members of the House of Representatives, 
to be appointed by the President of the Senate and the Speaker of the 
House of Representatives, respectively. The joint committee is 
authorized to make the necessary arrangements for the inauguration of 
the President-elect and Vice President-elect of the United States on 
January 20, 2025.

SEC. 2. SUPPORT OF THE JOINT COMMITTEE.

    The joint committee--
            (1) is authorized to utilize appropriate equipment and the 
        services of appropriate personnel of departments and agencies 
        of the Federal Government, under arrangements between the joint 
        committee and the heads of those departments and agencies, in 
        connection with the inaugural proceedings and ceremonies; and
            (2) may accept gifts and donations of goods and services to 
        carry out its responsibilities.
                                 <all>
```
#### Francis M. Gumbes et al., Appellants, *v.*Charles M. Hicks et al., Respondents.

*Gumbes*v. *Hicks,*116 App. Div. 120, affirmed.

(Submitted November 21, 1907;

decided December 10, 1907.)

Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered December 21, 1906, which reversed an order of the Broome County Court denying a motion for the vacation of a warrant of attachment and granting said motion.

The following question was certified: “Were the papers ■ upon which the warrant of attachment was granted sufficient to authorize the county judge to grant said attachment?”

*O. H Hitchcock*for appellants.

*Albert 8. Barnes*and *Hiram Mintz*for respondents.

Order affirmed, with costs ; questions certified answered in the negative ; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ.
#### § 1355.10 Scope.

Unless otherwise specified, part 1355 applies to States and Indian Tribes and contains general requirements for Federal financial participation under titles IV-B and IV-E of the Social Security Act.

[61 FR 58653, Nov. 18, 1996]
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, D
. C.

Safer Medical of Montana and

George Ackerson Complainants,


### v. City of Fort Benton, Montana and

Chouteau County, Montana Respondents. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
ORDER FAA Docket No
. 16-15

- 12

On February 22, 2016, Counsel for Respondent, City ofFort Benton, Montana, filed a Motion pursuant to 14 CFR 

### § 16.19(e), requesting an extension oftime to file its Answer to the Complaint. Counsel advised that he has been dealing with a recent medical issue requiring him to be away from his office. Counsel further advised that he contacted Counsel for the Complainants and Counsel for Chouteau County, and neither Counsel objected to the extension of time. Part 

### 16 is intended to expedite substantially the handling and disposition ofairport-related complaints. [See , Rules of Practice for Federally-AssistedAirport Enforcement Proceedings, Final Rule , 

### 6 1 Fed
. Reg. 

### 53998 (October 

### 16, 1996).) The rule provides that an extension oftime may be granted where necessary or appropriate for a fair and complete consideration of the matters before the agency. See 14 CFR § 16.11 (a). 

### An extension oftime is reasonabl e under the circumstances. Accordingly, Respondent is hereby granted an extension to February 29 , 20 16 in which to file its Answer to the Complaint. The Answer is now due on February 29, 2016. Complainants may file a Reply within ten days ofthe date of service ofthe Answer.

# ~ Acting Director, Office ofAirport Date Compliance and Management Analysis

### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on February 25, 2016 , I caused to be emailed a true copy ofthe foregoing document to the following email addresses : Counsel for Complainan ts Adrian Miller HOLLAND & HART LLP aamiller@hollandhart.com Counsel for Respondent City Brian Lilletvedt BOSCH, KUHR, DUGDALE, MARTIN, & KAZE, PLLP blilletvedt@bkdlaw.org Counsel for Respondent County Mitchell A. Young MONT ANA ASSOCIATION OF COUNTIES Defense Services myoung@mtcounties.org Hand

-Delivered to: FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket (AGC-600) FAA Office of Airport Compliance and Management Analysis (AC0-100)



# - Office ofAirport Compliance and Management Analysis