This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains regulatory documents having general

applicability and legal effect, most of which

are keyed to and codified in the Code of

Federal Regulations, which is published under

50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.

The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by

the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of

new books are listed in the first FEDERAL

REGISTER issue of each week.

Rules and Regulations Federal Register

58715 

Vol. 76, No. 184 

Thursday, September 22, 2011 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 71 

[Docket No. FAA–2011–0623; Airspace 

Docket No. 11–AEA–15] 

Amendment of Class E Airspace; 

Wrightstown, NJ 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Final rule, technical 

amendment. 

SUMMARY: This action amends Class E 

airspace for the Wrightstown, NJ, area, 

by changing Allaire Airport to 

Monmouth Executive Airport, Belmar, 

NJ. This action also updates the airspace 

descriptions to be in concert with the 

FAAs aeronautical database. 

DATES: Effective date 0901 UTC, 

December 15, 2011. The Director of the 

Federal Register approves this 

incorporation by reference action under 

title 1, Code of Federal Regulations, part 

51, subject to the annual revision of 

FAA Order 7400.9 and publication of 

conforming amendments. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Richard Horrocks, Operations Support 

Group, Eastern Service Center, Federal 

Aviation Administration, P.O. Box 

20636, Atlanta, Georgia 30320; 

telephone (404) 305–5588. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

The Rule 

This amendment to Title 14, Code of 

Federal Regulations (14 CFR) part 71 

amends Class E airspace for the 

Wrightstown, NJ, area at the request of 

FAAs Aeronautical Products. Allaire 

Airport has been renamed Monmouth 

Executive Airport, Belmar, NJ. Also, 

minor changes to the airspace 

descriptions are being made for clarity, 

as well as updating the geographic 

coordinates. Accordingly, since this is 

an administrative change, and does not 

affect the boundaries, altitudes, or 

operating requirements of the airspace, 

notice and public procedures under 5 

U.S.C. 553(b) are unnecessary. 

The Class E airspace designations are 

published in Paragraph 6005 of FAA 

order 7400.9V, dated August 9, 2011, 

and effective September 15, 2011, which 

is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 

71.1. The Class E airspace designations 

listed in this document will be 

published subsequently in the Order. 

The FAA has determined that his 

regulation only involves an established 

body of technical regulations for which 

frequent and routine amendments are 

necessary to keep them, operationally 

current, is non-controversial and 

unlikely to result in adverse or negative 

comments. It, therefore, (1) Is not a 

‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under 

Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a 

‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT 

Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 

FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3) 

does not warrant preparation of a 

Regulatory Evaluation as the anticipated 

impact is so minimal. Since this is a 

routine matter that will only affect air 

traffic procedures and air navigation, it 

is certified that this rule, when 

promulgated, will not have a significant 

economic impact on a substantial 

number of small entities under the 

criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. 

The FAA’s authority to issue rules 

regarding aviation safety is found in 

Title 49 of the United States Code. 

Subtitle I, Section 106 describes the 

authority of the FAA Administrator. 

Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs, 

describes in more detail the scope of the 

agency’s authority. 

This rulemaking is promulgated 

under the authority described in 

Subtitle VII, Part A. Subpart I, Section 

40103. Under that section, the FAA is 

charged with prescribing regulations to 

assign the use of airspace necessary to 

ensure the safety of aircraft and the 

efficient use of airspace. This regulation 

is within the scope of that authority as 

it amends controlled airspace for the 

Wrightstown, NJ, Class E airspace area. 

Lists of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71 

Airspace, Incorporation by reference, 

Navigation (air). 

Adoption of the Amendment 

In consideration of the foregoing, the 

Federal Aviation Administration 

amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows: 

PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, 

B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR 

TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND 

REPORTING POINTS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 71 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 40103, 40113, 

40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959– 

1963 Comp., p. 389. 

§ 71.1 [Amended] 

■ 2. The incorporation by reference in 

14 CFR 71.1 of Federal Aviation 

Administration Order 7400.9V, Airspace 

Designations and Reporting Points, 

dated August 9, 2011, and effective 

September 15, 2011, is amended as 

follows: 

Paragraph 6005 Class E airspace areas 

extending upward from 700 feet or more 

above the surface of the earth. 

* * * * * 

AEA NJ E5 Wrightstown, NJ [Amended] 

Lakewood, Lakewood Airport, NJ 

(Lat. 40°04′00′′ N., long. 74°10′40′′ W.) 

McGuire AFB, NJ 

(Lat. 40°00′56′′ N., long. 74°35′30′′ W.) 

Robbinsville, Trenton-Robbinsville Airport, 

NJ 

(Lat. 40°12′50′′ N., long. 74°36′06′′ W.) 

Belmar, Monmouth Executive Airport, NJ 

(Lat. 40°11′12′′ N., long. 74°07′28′′ W.) 

Toms River, Robert J. Miller Airpark, NJ 

(Lat. 39°55′39′′ N., long. 74°17′33′′ W.) 

Lakehurst (Navy) TACAN 

(Lat. 40°02′06′′ N., long. 74°21′08′′ W.) 

Colts Neck VOR/DME 

(Lat. 40°18′41′′ N., long. 74°09′35′′ W.) 

Coyle VORTAC 

(Lat. 39°49′02′′ N., long. 74°25′54′′ W.) 

Robbinsville VORTAC 

(Lat. 40°12′09′′ N., long. 74°29′42′′ W.) 

That airspace extending upward from 700 

feet above the surface within a 6.4-mile 

radius of Lakewood Airport and within a 

10.5-mile radius of McGuire AFB and within 

an 11.3-mile radius of the Lakehurst (Navy) 

TACAN extending clockwise from the 

TACAN 310° radial to the 148° radial and 

within 4.4 miles each side of the Coyle 

VORTAC 031° radial extending from the 

VORTAC to 11.3 miles northeast and within 

2.6 miles southwest and 4.4 miles northeast 

of the Lakehurst (Navy) TACAN 148° radial 

extending from the TACAN to 12.2 miles 

southeast and within a 6.4-mile radius of 

Trenton-Robbinsville Airport and within 5.7 

miles north and 4 miles south of the 

Robbinsville VORTAC 278° and 098° radials 


tkelley on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with RULES
58716 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 184 / Thursday, September 22, 2011 / Rules and Regulations 

1 Interpretation of Transmission Planning 

Reliability Standards, 75 FR 14386 (March 25, 

2010), FERC Stats. & Regs. ¶ 32,655 (2010). 

2 16 U.S.C. 824 (2006). 

3 Id. 824o(d)(2). 

4 Id. 824o(e)(3). 

extending from 4.8 miles west to 10 miles 

east of the VORTAC and within a 6.7-mile 

radius of Monmouth Executive Airport and 

within 1.8 miles each side of the Colts Neck 

VOR/DME 167° radial extending from the 

Monmouth Executive Airport 6.7-mile radius 

to the VOR/DME and within 4 miles each 

side of the 312° bearing from Monmouth 

Executive airport extending from the 6.7-mile 

radius of the airport to 9 miles northwest of 

the airport and within a 6.5-mile radius of 

Robert J. Miller Air Park and within 1.3 miles 

each side of the Coyle VORTAC 044° radial 

extending from the 6.5-mile radius to the 

VORTAC, excluding the portions that 

coincide with the Atlantic City, NJ, 

Princeton, NJ. Old Bridge NJ, Philadelphia, 

PA, Class E airspace areas. 

Issued in College Park, Georgia, on 

September 9, 2011. 

Mark D. Ward, 

Manager, Operations Support Group, Eastern 

Service Center, Air Traffic Organization. 

[FR Doc. 2011–24348 Filed 9–21–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 

16 CFR Part 310 

Telemarketing Sales Rule 

AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission. 

ACTION: Correcting amendments. 

SUMMARY: The Federal Trade 

Commission published a final amended 

Telemarketing Sales Rule in the Federal 

Register on August 10, 2010 (75 FR 

48458), with new provisions to address 

the telemarketing of debt relief services. 

This document makes technical 

corrections in that final rule. 

DATES: Effective on September 22, 2011. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Karen S. Hobbs, Attorney, Division of 

Marketing Practices, Bureau of 

Consumer Protection, Federal Trade 

Commission, Washington, DC 20580, 

(202) 326–3587. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This 

document makes technical corrections 

in the Telemarketing Sales Rule. 

List of Subjects in 16 CFR Part 310 

Telemarketing, Trade practices. 

Accordingly, 16 CFR part 310 is 

corrected by making the following 

correcting amendments: 

PART 310—TELEMARKETING SALES 

RULE 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 310 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 15 U.S.C. 6101–6108. 

§ 310.4 [Amended] 

■ 2. In § 310.4: 

■ a. Amend the last sentence of 

paragraph (a)(7) by removing ‘‘(a)(6)(i)’’ 

and adding in its place ‘‘(a)(7)(i)’’. 

■ b. Amend paragraph (a)(7)(i)(B) by 

removing ‘‘(a)(6)(i)(A)’’ and adding in its 

place ‘‘(a)(7)(i)(A)’’. 

■ c. Amend the introductory text of 

paragraph (a)(7)(ii) by removing 

‘‘(a)(6)(i)’’ and adding in its place 

‘‘(a)(7)(i)’’. 

■ d. Amend paragraph (a)(7)(ii)(B) by 

removing ‘‘(a)(6)(ii)(A)’’ and adding in 

its place A(a)(7)(ii)(A)’’. 

By direction of the Commission. 

Donald S. Clark, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2011–24361 Filed 9–21–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6750–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission 

18 CFR Part 40 

[Docket No. RM10–6–000; Order No. 754] 

Interpretation of Transmission 

Planning Reliability Standard 

AGENCY: Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission, Energy. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: On November 17, 2009, the 

North American Electric Reliability 

Corporation (NERC) submitted a 

petition requesting approval of NERC’s 

interpretation of Requirement R1.3.10 of 

Commission-approved transmission 

planning Reliability Standard TPL–002– 

0 (System Performance Following Loss 

of a Single Bulk Electric System 

Element). In a March 2010 Notice of 

Proposed Rulemaking (NOPR), the 

Commission proposed to reject NERC’s 

proposed interpretation, and instead 

proposed an alternative interpretation of 

Requirement R1.3.10 of Reliability 

Standard TPL–002–0. As a result of the 

comments received in response to the 

proposal, the Commission declines to 

adopt the NOPR proposal and approves 

NERC’s proposed interpretation. In 

addition, as proposed by several 

commenters, the Commission directs 

NERC and Commission staff to initiate 

a process to identify any reliability 

issues, as discussed below. 

DATES: Effective Date: This rule will 

become effective October 24, 2011. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Ron LeComte (Legal Information), Office 

of General Counsel, 888 First Street, 

NE., Washington, DC 20426. 

ron.lecomte@ferc.gov. 

Eugene Blick (Technical Information), 

Office of Electric Reliability, 888 First 

Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. 

eugene.blick@ferc.gov. 

Lauren Rosenblatt (Legal Information), 

Office of Enforcement, 888 First 

Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. 

lauren.rosenblatt@ferc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 136 FERC 

¶ 61,186 

Before Commissioners: Jon Wellinghoff, 

Chairman; Marc Spitzer, Philip D. Moeller, 

John R. Norris, and Cheryl A. LaFleur. 

Issued September 15, 2011 

1. On November 17, 2009, the North 

American Electric Reliability 

Corporation (NERC) submitted a 

petition requesting approval of NERC’s 

interpretation of Requirement R1.3.10 of 

Commission-approved transmission 

planning Reliability Standard TPL–002– 

0 (System Performance Following Loss 

of a Single Bulk Electric System 

Element). In a March 2010 Notice of 

Proposed Rulemaking (NOPR),1 the 

Commission proposed to reject NERC’s 

proposed interpretation, and instead 

proposed an alternative interpretation of 

Requirement R1.3.10 of Reliability 

Standard TPL–002–0. As a result of the 

comments received in response to the 

proposal, the Commission declines to 

adopt the NOPR proposal and approves 

NERC’s proposed interpretation of 

Requirement R1.3.10 of Reliability 

Standard TPL–002–0. In addition, as 

proposed by several commenters, the 

Commission directs NERC and 

Commission staff to initiate a process to 

identify any reliability issues, as 

discussed below. 

I. Background 

2. Section 215 of the Federal Power 

Act (FPA) requires a Commissioncertified Electric Reliability 

Organization (ERO) to develop 

mandatory and enforceable Reliability 

Standards, which are subject to 

Commission review and approval.2

Specifically, the Commission may 

approve, by rule or order, a proposed 

Reliability Standard or modification to a 

Reliability Standard if it determines that 

the Standard is just, reasonable, not 

unduly discriminatory or preferential, 

and in the public interest.3 Once 

approved, the Reliability Standards may 

be enforced by the ERO, subject to 

Commission oversight, or by the 

Commission independently.4


tkelley on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with RULES