alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 213 (Friday, November 3, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 64631]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9044]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

32 CFR Part 58


Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV-1)

AGENCY: Department of Defense.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document removes part 58, ``Human Immunodeficiency Virus 
(HIV-1)'' presently in Title 32 of the Code of Federal Regulations. 
This part has served the purpose for which it was intended in the CFR 
and is no longer necessary.

DATES: Effective Date: November 3, 2006.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: L. Pahland, 703-681-1703, extension 
5213.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This part 58 is removed to as a part of a 
DoD exercise to remove CFR parts no longer required to be codified. The 
corresponding DoD Instruction 6485.01 is available at http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/html/648501.htm.

List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 58

    Foreign relations, Government employees, HIV/AIDS, Military 
personnel.

PART 58--[REMOVED]

0
Accordingly, by the authority of 10 U.S.C. 301, 32 CFR part 58 is 
removed.

    Dated: October 30, 2006.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 06-9044 Filed 10-2-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M
§ 1152.6 What procedures apply to the selection of programs and activities under these regulations? ( a ) A state may select any program or activity published in the Federal Register in accordance with § 1152.3 of this part for intergovernmental review under these regulations. Each state, before selecting programs and activities shall consult with local elected officials.
( b ) Each state that adopts a process shall notify the Chairman of the Endowment's programs and activities selected for that process.
( c ) A state may notify the Chairman of changes in its selections at any time. For each change, the state shall submit to the Chairman an assurance that the state has consulted with elected local officials regarding the change. The Endowment may establish deadlines by which states are required to inform the Chairman of changes in their program selections.
( d ) The Chairman uses a state's process as soon as feasible, depending on individual programs and activities, after the Chairman is notified of its selections.
II 

Calendar No. 295 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 924 

[Report No. 118–143] 

To amend the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal Development Act to extend the 

Chesapeake and Ohio Canal National Historical Park Commission. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 22, 2023 

Mr. CARDIN (for himself, Mrs. CAPITO, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, Mr. MANCHIN, Mr. 

WARNER, and Mr. KAINE) introduced the following bill; which was read 

twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

DECEMBER 20, 2023 

Reported by Mr. MANCHIN, without amendment 

A BILL 

To amend the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal Development Act 

to extend the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal National Historical Park Commission. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

2 

•S 924 RS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Chesapeake and Ohio 

3 Canal National Historical Park Commission Extension 

4 Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. CHESAPEAKE AND OHIO CANAL NATIONAL HISTOR6 ICAL PARK COMMISSION. 

7 Section 6(g) of the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal De8 velopment Act (16 U.S.C. 410y–4(g)) is amended by strik9 ing ‘‘40’’ and all that follows through the period at the 

10 end and inserting ‘‘on September 30, 2034.’’. 

Calendar No. 295 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 924 

[Report No. 118–143] 

A BILL 

To amend the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal DevelopCanal National Historical Park Commission. ment Act to extend the Chesapeake and Ohio 

DECEMBER 20, 2023 

Reported without amendment
§ 148.102 Scope and applicability date. ( a ) *Scope and applicability.* ( 1 ) Individual health insurance coverage includes all health insurance coverage (as defined in § 144.103 of this subchapter) that is neither health insurance coverage sold in connection with an employment-related group health plan, nor short-term, limited-duration coverage as defined in § 144.103 of this subchapter.
( 2 ) The requirements that pertain to guaranteed renewability for all individuals, to protections for mothers and newborns with respect to hospital stays in connection with childbirth, and to protections against discrimination based on genetic information apply to all issuers of individual health insurance coverage in the State.
( b ) *Applicability dates.* Except as provided in §§ 148.124, 148.170, and 148.180, the requirements of this part apply to health insurance coverage offered, sold, issued, renewed, in effect, or operated in the individual market after June 30, 1997. Notwithstanding the previous sentence, for short-term, limited-duration insurance sold or issued on or after September 1, 2024, the definition of *short-term, limited-duration insurance* in § 144.103 of this subchapter applies for coverage periods beginning on or after September 1, 2024. For short-term, limited-duration insurance sold or issued before September 1, 2024 (including any subsequent renewal or extension consistent with applicable law), the definition of *short-term, limited-duration insurance* in 45 CFR 144.103, revised as of October 1, 2023, continues to apply, except that paragraph (1)(ii) of the definition of *short-term, limited-duration insurance* in § 144.103 applies for coverage periods beginning on or after September 1, 2024.
[79 FR 30340, May 27, 2014, as amended at 81 FR 75327, Oct. 31, 2016; 83 FR 38243, Aug. 3, 2018; 89 FR 23419, Apr. 3, 2024]
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsElectromagnetic backscattering by plates and disksWith the recent development of diffraction coefficients for imperfectly conducting half-planes, it has become possible to analyze a wide variety of problems for which the impedance surface boundary condition applies. This impedance boundary condition, while approximate, was utilized to extend the usefulness of the Uniform Geometrical Theory of Diffraction (UTD) beyond the perfectly conducting geometries. These half-plane diffraction coefficients are used to analyze patterns of an antenna in the presence of an imperfectly conducting flat polygonal plate. The Geometrical Theory of Diffraction (GTD) techniques were also used to investigate the backscattering from perfectly conducting plates. To further improve the soft polarization results for wide angles, a model for the creeping wave or circulating current on the edge of the disk was obtained and used to find an additional component of the backscattered field. The backscattering from a square plate was then analyzed using GTD. Backscattering in both the principal and off-principal planes was examined.Document ID19870017635Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsBalanis, Constantine A.*(Arizona State Univ. Tempe, AZ, United States)*Griesser, Timothy*(Arizona State Univ. Tempe, AZ, United States)*Marsland, Diane M.*(Arizona State Univ. Tempe, AZ, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateFebruary 2, 1987Subject CategoryCommunications And RadarReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:180643NASA-CR-180643Accession Number87N27068Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAG1-562Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19870017635.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
SCHEDULE P 

(Form 8865)

(Rev. December 2019)

Department of the Treasury 

Internal Revenue Service

Acquisitions, Dispositions, and Changes of Interests 

in a Foreign Partnership (Under Section 6046A)

▶ Attach to Form 8865. See Instructions for Form 8865.

▶ Go to www.irs.gov/Form8865 for instructions and the latest information.

OMB No. 1545-1668

Name of person filing Form 8865 Filer’s identification number

Name of foreign partnership EIN (if any) Reference ID number (see instr.)

Part I Acquisitions

(a) 

Name, address, and identification number of 

person from whom your interest was acquired

(b) 

Date of acquisition

(c) 

FMV of 

interest acquired

(d) 

Basis in 

interest acquired

(e) 

% of interest 

before acquisition

(f) 

% of interest 

after acquisition

Part II Dispositions

(a) 

Name, address, and identification number of 

person who acquired your interest

(b) 

Date of disposition

(c) 

FMV of 

interest disposed

(d) 

Basis in 

interest disposed

(e) 

% of interest 

before disposition

(f) 

% of interest 

after disposition

Part III Change in Proportional Interest

(a) 

Description of change

(b) 

Date of change

(c) 

FMV of 

interest

(d) 

Basis in 

interest

(e) 

% of interest 

before change

(f) 

% of interest 

after change

Part IV Supplemental Information Required To Be Reported (see instructions)

For Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see the Instructions for Form 8865. Cat. No. 25943Q Schedule P (Form 8865) (Rev. 12-2019)
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350) In connection with the Annual Report of GateHouse Media, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ Michael E. ReedMichael E. Reed Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)March 17, 2008
SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF EMILY J. REYNOLDS, 

SECRETARY OF THE SENATE

By Michelle Haynes, Executive Clerk

ONE HUNDRED EIGHTH CONGRESS 

FINAL ISSUE

FIRST SESSION {

SECOND SESSION {

Issue No. 293

CONVENED JANUARY 7, 2003

ADJOURNED DECEMBER 9, 2003

CONVENED JANUARY 20, 2004
RESOLUTIONS AND MOTIONS OVER, UNDER THE RULE 

S. Res. 192 Executive Resolution to discharge the David W. McKeague nomination. July 7, 2003. - Mr. Frist 

S. Res. 193 Executive Resolution to discharge the Susan Bieke Neilson nomination. July 7, 2003. - Mr. Frist 

S. Res. 194 Executive Resolution to discharge the Henry W. Saad nomination. July 7, 2003. - Mr. Frist 

S. Res. 195 Executive Resolution to discharge the Richard A. Griffin nomination. July 7, 2003. - Mr. Frist 

NOTE ON TREATY AND NOMINATIONS

NOTE: The treaty remaining on the Executive Calendar is, under the rules of the Senate, automatically rereferred 

to the Committee on Foreign Relations at the sine die adjournment of the Senate, and remains pending in 

committee for action in subsequent Congresses. All nominations remaining on the Executive Calendar, under the 

rules of the Senate, failed of confirmation at the time of sine die adjournment of the Senate and are returned to the 

President (together with other nominations received by the Senate and not acted upon by the committees to which 

they had been referred), and must be resubmitted in the next Congress to be further considered 

(December 8, 2004.)
RESOLUTIONS

CALENDAR 

NO.

S. RES. 

NO.

SUBJECT 

REPORTED 

BY

1

 
TREATIES

CALENDAR 

NO.

TREATY

DOC. NO.

SUBJECT 

REPORTED 

BY

2

13 103-39 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea Mar 11, 2004 Reported favorably 

by Mr. Lugar, Committee on 

Foreign Relations with printed 

Ex. Rept.108-10 and a 

resolution of advice and 

consent to ratification with 

declarations and 

understandings. 
* Signifies nominee’s commitment to respond to requests to appear and testify before any duly constituted committee of the Senate 

NOMINATIONS

CALENDAR 

NO.

MESSAGE

NO.

NOMINEE, OFFICE, AND PREDECESSOR REPORTED 

BY

3

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

* 237 140 Thomas C. Dorr, of Iowa, to be Under Secretary 

of Agriculture for Rural Development, vice Jill 

L. Long, resigned. 

Jun 18, 2003 Reported by Mr. 

Cochran, Committee on 

Agriculture, Nutrition, and 

Forestry, without printed 

report. 

* 238 141 Thomas C. Dorr, of Iowa, to be a Member of the 

Board of Directors of the Commodity Credit 

Corporation,vice Jill L. Long, resigned. 

Jun 18, 2003 Reported by Mr. 

Cochran, Committee on 

Agriculture, Nutrition, and 

Forestry, without printed 

report. 
NOMINATIONS PLACED ON THE SECRETARY’S DESK

4
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JUNE 1, 2022

NO. 03-21-00516-CV

Augustin Rivera, Jr., Teresa Ereon Giltner, Harold Odom,

Barbara Ellis, Anna M. McKim, Cynthia Eva Hujar Orr, C. Alfred MacKenzie,

Dwaine M. Massey, and Carlos R. Soltero, in their Official Capacities as

Members of the Texas Board of Law Examiners, Appellants

v.

Deborah Sonnenschein, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 345TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, BAKER, AND TRIANA

REVERSED AND RENDERED IN PART; REVERSED AND REMANDED IN PART --

OPINION BY JUSTICE BAKER

This is an appeal from the interlocutory order signed by the trial court on September 23, 2021. 

Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was reversible 

error in the trial court’s interlocutory order. Therefore, the Court reverses the order and renders

judgment dismissing appellee’s claims except her claims for violations of her rights to equal 

protection, which claims we remand to the trial court to allow appellee an opportunity to amend 

her pleadings to state sufficient facts supporting them and for further proceedings consistent with 

this opinion. Each party shall pay the costs of appeal incurred by that party, both in this Court 

and in the court below.
#### § 51.13 When will the Director determine if proposals are responsive?

The Director will determine if proposals are responsive or non-responsive prior to or as of the date of selection of the best proposal.
[Crim. No. 1997.

Third Dist.

Apr. 1, 1947.]

#### In re FREDERICK D. GALLOWAY, on Habeas Corpus.

Frederick D. Galloway, in pro. per. for Petitioner.

Fred N. Howser, Attorney General, and Jas. O. Reavis, Deputy Attorney General, for Respondent.

ADAMS, P. J.

This is a proceeding in habeas corpus. The petitioner is confined in the State Prison at Folsom under a judgment of conviction of the crime of assault with a deadly weapon and an adjudication that he is an habitual criminal by virtue of his admission of two prior convictions of a felony. The basis for his application is his claim that one of the prior convictions did not constitute a felony for which he could be adjudged an habitual criminal and that his sentence is therefore excessive.

The petitioner was accused by information of the crime of ' assault with a deadly weapon committed in Solano County on or about July 9, 1941. The information also alleged two prior convictions of felonies for which the petitioner had served terms. The first prior conviction alleged was for the violation of the National Motor Vehicle Theft Act in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia on or about April 12, 1923, under the name of Fred Roland. This is the prior conviction that is put in issue by the petition. The petitioner pleaded not guilty by reason of insanity to the main charge and a jury returned a verdict against that plea. Petitioner admitted the two prior convictions as alleged. The court adjudged petitioner to be an habitual criminal.

*881The sole problem presented here is whether said prior conviction could be used as a basis for adjudging petitioner to be an habitual criminal. In his answer and return to the petition, respondent freely admits that said prior conviction was improperly considered as one of the felonies requisite to an adjudication of petitioner as an habitual criminal and that petitioner should not have been so adjudged.

The identical problem was presented in *People*v. *Lohr,*28 Cal.App.2d 397 [82 P.2d 615], and in that case it was held that an admission of conviction of a violation of the National Motor Vehicle Theft Act, with nothing more, did not constitute a prior conviction such as could be considered in adjudging a defendant to be an habitual criminal.

The Lohr case was cited with approval in *In re Connell,*68 Cal.App.2d 360 [156 P.2d 483], and both cases were cited with approval in *In re Seeley,*29 Cal.2d 294, 300 [176 P.2d 24].

It follows that the portion of the judgment in this case which determined that the petitioner is an habitual criminal is invalid. That portion of the judgment is therefore annulled. The balance of the judgment is valid. The Adult Authority is therefore directed to disregard the determination that petitioner is an habitual criminal, and to fix his term of imprisonment without regard thereto.

The prisoner is remanded.

Schottky, J. pro tern., and Peek, J., concurred.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the Court has determined th a t

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-50867 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

VERSUS

ELIZABETH CASTILLO DELEON, Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas

(SA-98-CR-54-ALL)

JUne 15, 1999 Before DAVIS, DUHÉ, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Court-appointed counsel for Elizabeth Castillo DeLeon has

m oved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by
Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). DeLeon has filed a
response. Our independent review of the brief, the record, and Deleon’s response discloses no non-frivolous issue in this direct appeal. To the extent that her claims are based on ineffectiveassistance of counsel, DeLeon can raise them in a § 2255 proceeding

pursuant to the waiver-of-appeal exception in her plea agreement. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS
DISMISSED.
#### § 1226.4 General.

Under section 403 of the Act, volunteer programs may not be conducted in a manner which supports or results in the identification of such programs with prohibited activities. This section prescribes the nature and extent of involvement in such activity by an organization which would preclude the assignment of volunteers to the organization.
§ 156.911 Dismissal of request for hearing. An ALJ will order a request for hearing dismissed if the ALJ determines that: ( a ) The request for hearing was not filed within 30 days as specified by § 156.905(a) or any extension of time granted by the ALJ pursuant to § 156.905(b).
( b ) The request for hearing fails to meet the requirements of § 156.907.
( c ) The entity that filed the request for hearing is not a respondent under § 156.901.
( d ) The respondent has abandoned its request.
( e ) The respondent withdraws its request for hearing.
SERVED: FEBRUARY 25, 2015 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC IN THE MATTER OF

MARCO FIMBRES DOCKET NO. FAA-2015-0204 (Civil Penalty Action)

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING -·:'

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2014WP070124) has been assigned to Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin. All future pleadings and other communications regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing Docket, and the other persons onthe**at!§,~d** Service List. /,/···/' 

# -...,)

__..... ····· ..........

Attachment
- Service List I ' 

# /**~/** \_ ____.....

# k~~e A.

# Yo~er ChiefAdministrative 1,;aW:'Judge / /

# ~

### SERVICE LIST
- BY U.S. MAIL ORIGINAL & 

### ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 1



### Marco A. Fimbres, Respondent 

### 4444 East Benson Highway, Trlr 21 Tucson, AZ 85706 Lierre Green, Complainant's Counsel 

### ONE COPY

Attorney, Office ofthe Regional Counsel, AWP-7.6 Western-Pacific Region Federal Aviation Administration P. 

### 0. Box 92007 Los Angeles, CA 90009-2007 TEL: 310-725-7117 FPC(: 310-725-6816 The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin,AdministrativeLaw Judge 

### Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FPC(: 202-366-7536 DocketNo. FAA-2015-0204 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 2
#### Lucinda M. Monroe, Appellant, *v.*Ida F. Mather-Lovelace et al., as Administrators of the Estate of Charles W. Mather, Deceased, et al., Respondents.

(Argued November 18, 1907;

decided December 3, 1907.)

Motion to amend remittitur so as to provide that the respondents Ida F. Mather-Lovelace et ah, as administrators, and the respondents A. D. Mather *&*Co.’s Bank et al., recover separate bills of costs and disbursements granted, without costs. (See 189 N. Y. 563.)
From:•King.Melanie@epamail.epa.gov

Sent:•Wednesday, July 28, 2010 1:35 PM To:•Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov Cc:•Talcott.Fred@epamail.epa.gov; Wayland.Robertj@epamail.epa.gov; Nagelhout.Peter@epamail.epa.gov; horowitz.michael@epamail.epa.gov; Sorrels.Larry@epamail.epa.gov; Lamson.Amy@epamail.epa.gov Subject:•SI RICE NESHAP cost breakout by subcategory Attachments:•Existing SI RICE NESHAP cost breakdown by subcategory 7-28-10.xls

Cortney, The attached spreadsheet shows the cost breakout by subcategory. (See attached file: Existing SI RICE NESHAP cost breakdown by subcategory 7- 28-10.xls)

Melanie King Energy Strategies Group Sector Policies and Programs Division Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Mail Code D243-01 RTP, NC 27711

Phone: (919) 541-2469 Fax: (919) 541-5450 king.melanie@epa.gov
01/01/08 thru 05/31/08

LVM Unit 2 Unit 3 Unit 4

(lbs/hr) (lbs/hr) (lbs/hr)

12 Hr Max Value 62.63 22.78 77.29

12 Hr Avg Value 2.11 1.05 4.21

Std Dev 6.26 2.78 7.88

Avg + I StdDev 8.37 3.83 12.09

Avg + 2 StdDev 14.63 6.61 19.97

 01/01/08 thru 05/31/08

SVM Unit 2 Unit 3 Unit 4

(lbs/hr) (lbs/hr) (lbs/hr)

12 Hr Max Value 90.73 81.59 57.57

12 Hr Avg Value 2.18 2.93 3.40

Std Dev 7.00 8.64 6.34

Avg + I StdDev 9.18 11.57 9.74

Avg + 2 StdDev 16.18 20.21 16.08