alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1179.1 Purpose and scope. ( a ) This regulation provides procedures for the collection by administrative offset of a Federal employee's salary without his/her consent to satisfy certain debts owed to the Federal government. These regulations apply to all Federal employees who owe debts to the National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH) and to current employees of the National Endowment for the Humanities who owe debts to other Federal agencies. This regulation does not apply when the employee consents to recovery from his/her current pay account.
( b ) This regulation does not apply to debts or claims arising under: ( 1 ) The Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended, 26 U.S.C. 1 *et seq*;
( 2 ) The Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 301 *et seq*;
( 3 ) The tariff laws of the United States; or
( 4 ) Any case where a collection of a debt by salary offset is explicitly provided for or prohibited by another statute.
( c ) This regulation does not apply to any adjustment to pay arising out of an employee's selection of coverage or a change in coverage under a Federal benefits program requiring periodic deductions from pay if the amount to be recovered was accumulated over four pay periods or less.
( d ) This regulation does not preclude the compromise, suspension, or termination of collection action where appropriate under the standards implementing the Federal Claims Collection Act 31 U.S.C. 3711 *et seq.* 4 CFR parts 101 through 105 45 CFR part 1177.
( e ) This regulation does not preclude an employee from requesting waiver of an overpayment under 5 U.S.C. 5584, 10 U.S.C. 2774 or 32 U.S.C. 716 or in any way questioning the amount or validity of the debt by submitting a subsequent claim to the General Accounting Office. This regulation does not preclude an employee from requesting a waiver pursuant to other statutory provisions applicable to the particular debt being collected.
( f ) Matters not addressed in these regulations should be reviewed in accordance with the Federal Claims Collection Standards at 4 CFR 101.1 *et seq.*
#### The Farmers’ Loan and Trust Company, as Trustee under Deeds of Trust Made by Jabez A. Bostwick, Deceased, Appellant, *v.*Helen C. Bostwick, Individually and as Executrix of the Will of Jabez A. Bostwick, Deceased, et al., Respondents, and Fannie E. B. Francis et al., Appellants and Respondents.

*Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.*v. *Bostwick,*120 App. Div. 271, reversed.

(Argued December 20, 1907;

decided January 21, 1908.)

Cross-appeals from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered July 15, 1901, which modified and affirmed as modified a judgment of Special Term construing the will of Jabez A. Bostwick, deceased, and certain trust deeds executed by him.

*James F. lloran*for plaintiff, appellant.

*George L. Shea/rer*for United States Trust Company, as trustee, appellant and respondent.

*William Pierrepont Williams*and *Lanman Crosby*for Hamilton W. Cary, as administrator, appellant and respondent.

*Fgerton L. Winthrop, Jr.,*for Fannie E. Francis, appellant and respondent.

*Charles F. Buelcingham*for Albert C. Bostwick, Jr., et ah, appellants and respondents.

*Franh, L. Polls*for Marion B. Carstairs et ah, appellants ' and respondents.

*George F. Chambet'lain*for Albert C. Bostwick, respondent and appellant.

*Ward B. Chamlberlavn*for Helen C. Bostwick, respondent and appellant.

Judgment of Appellate Division reversed and that of Special Term affirmed, with costs to all parties appearing in this court and filing- briefs, payable out of the fund, on the authority of *N. Y. Life*Ins. *& Trust Co.*v. *Cary*(191 N. Y. 33).
§ 158.101 Basis and scope. ( a ) *Basis.* This part implements section 2718 of the Public Health Service Act (PHS Act).
( b ) *Scope.* Subpart A of this part establishes the requirements for health insurance issuers (“issuers”) offering group or individual health insurance coverage to report information concerning premium revenues and the use of such premium revenues for clinical services provided to enrollees, activities that improve health care quality, and all other non-claims costs. Subpart B describes how this information will be used to determine, with respect to each medical loss ratio (MLR) reporting year, whether the ratio of the amount of adjusted premium revenue expended by the issuer on permitted costs to the total amount of adjusted premium revenue (MLR) meets or exceeds the percentages established by section 2718(b)(1) of the PHS Act. Subpart B also addresses requirements for calculating any rebate amounts that may be due in the event an issuer does not meet the applicable MLR standard. Subpart C implements the provision of section 2718(b)(1)(A)(ii) of the PHS Act allowing the Secretary to adjust the MLR standard for the individual market in a State if requiring issuers to meet that standard may destabilize the individual market. Subparts D through F provide for enforcement of this part, including requirements for issuers to maintain records and civil monetary penalties that may be assessed against issuers who violate the requirements of this part.
[75 FR 74921, Dec. 1, 2010, as amended at 75 FR 82278, Dec. 30, 2010]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                             646
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   31,198
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,206
<INVENTORY>                                     39,563
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                74,315
<PP&E>                                           7,472
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,552
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  87,731
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           36,507
<BONDS>                                         91,800
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           39,973
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            12
<OTHER-SE>                                    (80,858)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    87,731
<SALES>                                        107,863
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               107,863
<CGS>                                           73,249
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   77,796
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   170
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,634
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,655
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,024
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,631
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,631
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
§ 1351.21 What confidentiality requirements apply to these programs? Several program policies regarding confidentiality of information, treatment, conflict of interest and state protection apply to recipients of Runaway and Homeless Youth Program grants. These include: ( a ) Confidential information. Pursuant to the Act, no records containing the identity of individual youth, including but not limited to lists of names, addresses, photographs, or records of evaluation of individuals served by a Runaway and Homeless Youth project, may be disclosed or transferred to any individual or to any public or private agency except: ( 1 ) For Basic Center Program grants, records maintained on individual runaway and homeless youth shall not be disclosed without the informed consent of the individual youth and parent or legal guardian to anyone other than another agency compiling statistical records or a government agency involved in the disposition of criminal charges against an individual runaway and homeless youth;
( 2 ) For Transitional Living Programs, records maintained on individual homeless youth shall not be disclosed without the informed consent of the individual youth to anyone other than an agency compiling statistical records;
( 3 ) Research, evaluation, and statistical reports funded by grants provided under section 343 of the Act are allowed to be based on individual data, but only if such data are de-identified in ways that preclude disclosing information on identifiable individuals; and
( 4 ) Youth served by a Runaway and Homeless Youth project shall have the right to review their records; to correct a record or file a statement of disagreement; and to be apprised of the individuals who have reviewed their records.
( b ) State law protection. HHS policies regarding confidential information and experimentation and treatment shall not apply if HHS finds that state law is more protective of the rights of runaway or otherwise homeless youth.
( c ) Procedures shall be established for the training of project staff in the protection of these rights and for the secure storage of records.
Government Aruba 

Ministn of'If.n1risrn. Tr(ln:->port.Hion, 

Prim.ln .Sc...tur AllJ Culture 

DIRECTIE LUCHTVAART ARUBA 

DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL AVIATION ARUBA 

Ons nummer: 

Our number: DL/1407-583-A 

Folder: 

Oranjestad, July 10, 2014 

Mr. Paul Gretch, Director 

Office of International Aviation 

US Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave., S.E., 

Washington, DC 20590, 

USA 

J awana.ellis.ctr@dot. gov 

Ref.: Operation of ih freedom VIP on demand charter flights by 

Comlux Aruba N.V. 

Reciprocity Statement 

This letter is to confirm that the Civil Aviation Authority of Aruba will grant, on the basis of 

reciprocity, the designated U.S. carriers approval to operate ih freedom charter flights in 

accordance with Annex II Section 1 of the Air Transport Agreement between the Kingdom of 

the Netherlands in respect of Aruba and the United States of America, signed September 181h, 

1997. This statement applies only for VIP on demand charter flights, for the period from 

August 1, 2014 to February 1, 2015. 

Yours truly, 

-- -~ e~ Management Team 

CAA-Aruba 

MHE/ 

Department of Civil Aviation 

Sabana Berde 73-B, ARUBA 

OJ: (297) 583 2665 &fl: (297) 582 3038 

e-mail: dca@dca.gov.aw 

TGR: CIVILAIRARUBA 

AFTN: TNCAYAYX
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER ON M OTION FOR R EHEARING

Appellate case name: Adan G. Adame et al

. v

. Glendale Optical, et al

.

Appellate case number: 01

- 16

- 00847

- CV

Trial court case number: 2006

- 76611

Trial court: 333rd District Court of Harris County

Date motion filed: September 14, 2018

Party filing motion: Appellants Adan G. Adame et al.

It is ordered that the motion for rehearing is DENIED GRANTED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Michael Massengale

Acting individually Acting for the Court

Panel consists of: Justices Keyes, Massengale, and Caughey

Date: November 29, 2018
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

WASHINGTON, DC 

Venice Jet Center, LLC 

Complainant, 

V. 

City of Venice, Florida 

Respondent. 

FAA Docket No. 16-09-05 

NOTICE OF LAW FIRM CHANGE 

C"D 

•-CJ) 

Counsel of record for Complainant Venice Jet Center, LLC provides this notice of^w 

=3 o> 

firm change. The new firm name and address are as follows: L J 

WIAND GUERRA KING P.L. 

3000 Bayport Drive, Suite 600 

Tampa, PL 33607 

Tel: 813-347-5100 

Fax:813-347-5155 

Please direct all notices, orders, pleadings, and other documents to Defendant's counsel 

accordingly. 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that I have served a true and correct copy of the foregoing on the 

following persons by overnight mail on November 17,2009: 

Office of the Chief Covinsel 

Attn: FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings 

Docket, AGC-610 

Room 925 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Ave., S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Original and 3 copies by overnight 

delivery 

Jonathan Cross 

Manager 

Airports and Environmental Law division 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Ave., S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Facsimile (202) 267-5769 

ICopy 
I hereby further certify that I have served a true and correct copy of the foregoing on the 

following persons by electronic mail on November 17, 2009: 

Elizabeth Head 

Senior Attorney 

Airports & Environmental Law Division 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

Email: Elizabeth.Head(a),faa.gov 

I hereby fiorther certify that I have served a true and correct copy of the foregoing on the 

following persons by overnight mail and electronic mail on November 17, 2009: 

Thomas R. Devine 

Kaplan Kirsch & Rockwell LLP 

1001 Connecticut Ave. NW, Ste. 800 

Washington, DC 20036 

Telephone: (202) 955-5600 

Email: tdevine(alkaplankirsch.com 

I hereby further certify that I have served a true and correct copy of the foregoing on the 

following persons by United States mail on November 17, 2009: 

Robert C. Anderson 

Hall & Anderson, P.A 

1314 East Venice Avenue, Suite E 

Venice, Florida 34285 

&ud<^y^^^,,^ p 

Ojianluca Mor^Jib, FBN 034997 

6rello@wiandlaw.com 

5minique Pearlman, FBN 0044135 

Dpearlman@ wiandlaw. com 

WIAND GUERRA KING P.L. 

3000 Bayport Drive, Suite 600 

Tampa, FL 33607 

Attorneys for the Complainant, Venice Jet 

Center, LLC
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 223 (Monday, November 20, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 67128]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9328]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

Date and Time: Tuesday, November 28, 2006 at 10 a.m.

Place: 999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC.

Status: This Meeting Will Be Closed to the Public.

Items to be Discussed: Compliance matters pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g. 
Audits conducted pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g, 438(b), and Title 26, 
U.S.C. Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings 
or arbitration. Internal personnel rules and procedures or matters 
affecting a particular employee.

Person to Contact for Information: Mr. Robert Biersack, Press Officer, 
Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Mary W. Dove,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 06-9328 Filed 11-16-06; 3:06 pm]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
§ 1615.3 Application of this part. This part does not prohibit legal assistance— ( a ) To challenge a conviction resulting from a criminal proceeding in which the defendant received representation from a recipient pursuant to Corporation regulations; or
( b ) Pursuant to a court appointment made under a statute or a court rule or practice of equal applicability to all attorneys in the jurisdiction, if authorized by the recipient after a determination that it is consistent with the primary responsibility of the recipient to provide legal assistance to eligible clients in civil matters.
§ 2105.3 Where should you send a FOIA request? ( a ) To make a request for Agency records, you must contact the Agency directly.
( b ) Address requests to the FOIA Officer found in the Agency contacts at *https://www.cfa.gov/foia .*
#### § 14.75 Nature of interest.
##### 



Certification Pursuant to Section 302
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of MetroCorp Bancshares, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known
to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting.
  /s/ George M. LeeGeorge M. LeeChief Executive Officer
BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

In the Matter of ) 

) A19-21 

Proposed Final Audit Report on the ) Agenda Document No. 22-32-A 

Association for Emergency Responders ) 

and Firefighters PAC ) 

CERTIFICATION 

I, Vicktoria J. Allen, recording secretary for the Federal Election Commission open 

meeting on July 28, 2022, do hereby certify that the Commission decided by a vote of 6-0 to 

approve the Proposed Final Audit Report on the Association for Emergency Responders and 

Firefighters, PAC (A19-21), as recommended in the Memorandum from the Chief Compliance 

Officer and the Audit Division dated June 16, 2022. 

Commissioners Broussard, Cooksey, Dickerson, Trainor, Walther, and Weintraub voted 

affirmatively for the decision. 

Attest: 

Digitally signed by Vicktoria J Vicktoria J Allen 

Date: 2022.08.01 15:35:46 Allen August 1, 2022 -04'00'

Date Vicktoria J. Allen 

Acting Deputy Secretary of the 

Commission
#### Drew v. Rearick *et al.,*appellants.

*Appeal must be based on a judgment.*

The findings of a judge before whom an action is tried constitute no basis for an appeal. A judgment must be entered upon them, before they can be reviewed by an appellate court.

“ Appeal from a judgment, decision or order entered * * * in favor of the plaintiff,” by defendant David Rearick.

This action was one of revivor, brought by Robert Drew against David Rearick and others, and was tried before Mr. Justice Barker without a jury, at the Genesee special term, March, 1873. The said justice found, among other things, that the plaintiff was entitled to a judgment of revivor against the defendant, directed further proceedings to be had, and appointed a referee to take proofs and report concerning certain payments alleged to have been made by the defendant. But no judgment was entered upon the findings. The defendant excepted to the “decision” of the judge as to certain findings of fact, and to “each and every finding of fact in said decision contained; ” also to “ the findings or conclusions of law in said decision contained.” But no case was made, or exceptions settled. The defendant Rearick appealed from a “judgment, decision or order” entered herein, on the oth of May, 1873.

*338
      *O. O. Cottle,*for appellant.

*William H. Gurney,*for respondent.

Gilbert, J.

The appeal in this case has brought up nothing for review. The findings of the justice constitute no basis for an appeal. A judgment must be entered hpon them before they can become the subject of review by an appellate court.

The appellant might have moved for a new trial upon a case or exceptions, pursuant to section 268 of the Code, but he has not done that; No case has been made, nor exceptions settled. Moreover, the important exceptions are to findings of fact. These can be determined only by a comparison of them with the evidence given upon the trial. That is not before us. The proceeding is wholly irregular. The appeal must, therefore, be dismissed, with costs.

*Appeal dismissed.*
Regulatory Evaluation 

Docket No. FAA- ~ \ S-b J <(;; Directorate Identifie r: 

!f you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update co v. {f 

they do not. click (or Tab) into and then out qlthe changed cell. 

Estimated Costs: 

Action Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

(e.g., Inspection, propeller, appliance) 

Work-hours Labor Parts Cost Total Costs Number of Total Cost replacement) (include cost (labor + u.s. for U.S. Fleet Do not include oncondition costs here access, testing, (@$85/h parts) Registered 

and close-up) our) Products 

inspect and replace 

BAI air duct and 4.0 •. 

'() ) $11 ,000 .. j II ' () \ I 16 ,. ,J }11! Jli 

install new brackets 

~ () !lii ~ (1 (' 0 .; ,, J!J 

( I ()(I : i ' I) ,Iii 

.;; tl (1•1 \ (I \\ OJJO 

:--. () ()I I " l)_i)(l \. ll no 

" 0 ilO ~-~ 0. ,, ) () {J( I 

1,' OJlO \ 0.00 " () Iii) 

'> (' ()( <, () ) '· I 'C 

s () (;0 ') l).fl{l " 1.1.()1 

~~) o on ') (l II() " C·.ll'J 

~) (1.0 .

1 "' I), (l() 1'.t\t1 

~ (j 00 ') () {)() "> () (•(J 

" 0.00 s () ()I! ' fJ ,(){\ 

~ o.uu s 0.00 '!> o Otl 

s (J ()() s () 00 s ().I I() 

s U.OO '-, i) ()() ~ I)J•f' 

s f) I)() s () ()() s fl.{)(' 

,') () ()(I '> ()J)I) ,. 0 !i{l 

s () ()() -; 0 J() \ () ()IJ 

s 0.1!0 .. 1)('(1 " O.l'\1 ·' 

The known number of products in compliance: 

Tota l Costs of compl iance for U.S. fl eet: $ 18 1,440 

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $ 

On-Condition Costs: · -

Action Work-hours Labor cost Parts Cost Cost per Product 

(e.g., Inspection, (include access, (@$85/hour) 

replacement) testing, and closeup) 

" U.OIJ ' ()I') 

s {I ()() '> u on 

s IJ.Oll '> () t'(l 

'b () 00 <..; '\ Uil 

7 
Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs): 

Executive Order 12866: 

Could the AD be considered a "significant regulatory action"? ~ 

YES* D NO 1:8] 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: 

Is the AD significant? ~ 

YES* D NO 1:8] 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act: 

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer. ~ 

YES D NO 1:8] 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: 

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? · 

YES* D NO 1:8] 

*Explanation: 

8