Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 115 / Monday, June 16, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 34217 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701, 

44702, 44704. 

The Special Conditions 

Accordingly, pursuant to the 

authority delegated to me by the 

Administrator, the following special 

conditions are issued as part of the type 

certification basis for Bombardier 

Aerospace Model BD–500–1A10 and 

BD–500–1A11 (CSeries) airplanes. 

Limit Engine Torque Loads 

In lieu of § 25.361(b) the following 

special conditions apply: 

1. For turbine engine installations, the 

engine mounts, pylons, and adjacent 

supporting airframe structure must be 

designed to withstand 1g level flight 

loads acting simultaneously with the 

maximum limit torque loads imposed 

by each of the following: 

(a) Sudden engine deceleration due to 

a malfunction that could result in a 

temporary loss of power or thrust, and 

(b) The maximum acceleration of the 

engine. 

2. For auxiliary power unit (APU) 

installations, the power unit mounts 

and adjacent supporting airframe 

structure must be designed to withstand 

1g level flight loads acting 

simultaneously with the maximum limit 

torque loads imposed by each of the 

following: 

(a) Sudden APU deceleration due to 

malfunction or structural failure; and 

(b) The maximum acceleration of the 

APU. 

3. For engine supporting structure, an 

ultimate loading condition must be 

considered that combines 1g flight loads 

with the transient dynamic loads 

resulting from: 

(a) The loss of any fan, compressor, or 

turbine blade; and separately 

(b) Where applicable to a specific 

engine design, any other engine 

structural failure that results in higher 

loads. 

4. The ultimate loads developed from 

the conditions specified in paragraphs 

3(a) and 3(b) of these special conditions 

are to be multiplied by a factor of 1.0 

when applied to engine mounts and 

pylons, and multiplied by a factor of 

1.25 when applied to adjacent 

supporting airframe structure. 

5. Any permanent deformation that 

results from the conditions specified in 

paragraph 3 must not prevent continued 

safe flight and landing. 

Issued in Renton, Washington, on June 6, 

2014. 

Jeffrey E. Duven, 

Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, 

Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2014–13923 Filed 6–13–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 71 

[Docket No. FAA–2013–0986; Airspace 

Docket No. 13–AGL–25] 

Establishment of Class E Airspace; 

Bois Blanc Island, MI 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Final rule, correction. 

SUMMARY: This action corrects an error 

in the legal description of a final rule 

published in the Federal Register of 

May 22, 2014, that establishes Class E 

airspace at Bois Blanc Island Airport, 

Bois Blanc Island, MI. The legal 

description noted incorrectly the 

airport’s state and geographic 

coordinates. 

DATES: Effective date: 0901 UTC, July 

24, 2014. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Raul 

Garza, Jr., Central Service Center, 

Operations Support Group, Federal 

Aviation Administration, Southwest 

Region, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort 

Worth, TX 76137; telephone: 817–321– 

7654. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

History 

On May 22, 2014, a final rule was 

published in the Federal Register 

establishing Class E airspace at Bois 

Blanc Island Airport, Bois Blanc Island, 

MI (79 FR 29323), Docket No. FAA– 

2013–0986. Subsequent to publication, 

the FAA found the document showing 

the wrong state and geographic location 

in the legal description. It should read 

Bois Blanc Island Airport, MI, (lat. 

45°45′59′′ N., long. 084°30′14′′ W.), 

instead of Bois Blanc Island Airport, 

MO, (lat. 38°20′52′′ N., long. 93°20′43′′ 

W.) This action makes the correction. 

Final Rule Correction 

Accordingly, pursuant to the 

authority delegated to me, in the 

Federal Register of May 22, 2014, (79 

FR 29323) FR Doc. 2014–11382, the 

state and geographic coordinates in the 

airspace designation regulatory text on 

page 29324, column 2, line 1, are 

corrected as follows: 

§ 71.1 [Amended] 

AGL MI E5 Bois Blanc Island, MI 

[Corrected] 

■ Remove Bois Blanc Island Airport, 

MO, (lat. 38°20′52′′ N., long. 93°20′43′′ 

W.) and add in its place Bois Blanc 

Island Airport, MI, (lat. 45°45′59′′ N., 

long. 084°30′14′′ W.) 

Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on June 6, 

2014. 

Christopher L. Southerland, 

Manager, Operations Support Group, ATO 

Central Service Center. 

[FR Doc. 2014–14049 Filed 6–13–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Bureau of Industry and Security 

15 CFR Parts 744 and 758 

[Docket No. 140530464–4464–01] 

RIN 0694–AG20 

Export Administration Regulations 

(EAR): Addition of Certain Persons to 

the Unverified List (UVL) and Making a 

Correction 

AGENCY: Bureau of Industry and 

Security, Commerce. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Industry and 

Security (BIS) is amending the Export 

Administration Regulations (EAR) by 

adding twenty-nine (29) persons to the 

Unverified List (the ‘‘Unverified List’’ or 

UVL). The 29 persons are being added 

to the UVL on the basis that BIS could 

not verify their bona fides because an 

end-use check could not be completed 

satisfactorily for reasons outside the 

U.S. Government’s control. In addition, 

this rule reinserts a requirement for 

exporters to file an Automated Export 

System (AES) record for all exports 

subject to the EAR involving persons 

listed on the UVL following that 

provision’s inadvertent removal from 

the EAR. 

The UVL contains the names and 

addresses of foreign persons who are or 

have been parties to a transaction, as 

that term is described in the EAR, 

involving the export, reexport, or 

transfer (in-country) of items subject to 

the EAR, and whose bona fides BIS has 

been unable to verify through an enduse check. There is a suspension of 

license exceptions for exports, 

reexports, and transfers (in-country) 

involving a party or parties to the 

transaction who are listed on the UVL, 

and a requirement for exporters, 

reexporters, and transferors to obtain 

(and keep a record of) a UVL statement 

from a party or parties to the transaction 

who are listed on the UVL before 

proceeding with exports, reexports, and 

transfers (in-country) involving items 

subject to the EAR, but where the item 

does not require a license. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES