alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 96 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. J. RES. 96

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of 
   Education relating to ``Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Sex in 
     Education Programs or Activities Receiving Federal Financial 
                             Assistance''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 12, 2024

Mrs. Hyde-Smith (for herself, Mr. Cassidy, Ms. Lummis, Mrs. Blackburn, 
 Mrs. Britt, Mrs. Fischer, Mr. Tuberville, Mr. Johnson, Mr. Marshall, 
 Mr. Lee, Mr. Risch, Mr. Crapo, Mr. Barrasso, Mr. Cotton, Mr. Scott of 
   South Carolina, Mr. Budd, Mr. Rounds, Mr. Braun, Mr. Wicker, Mr. 
Tillis, Mr. Daines, Mr. Cramer, Mr. Hoeven, Mr. Cornyn, Mr. Hawley, Mr. 
Grassley, Mr. Mullin, Mr. Kennedy, Mr. Rubio, Mr. Ricketts, Mr. Graham, 
  Mr. Cruz, Mr. Schmitt, Mr. Lankford, and Mr. Vance) introduced the 
 following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the 
          Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of 
   Education relating to ``Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Sex in 
     Education Programs or Activities Receiving Federal Financial 
                             Assistance''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Department of Education relating to 
``Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Sex in Education Programs or 
Activities Receiving Federal Financial Assistance'' (89 Fed. Reg. 33474 
(April 29, 2024)), and such rule shall have no force or effect.
                                 <all>
```
§ 101.43 Criteria for assistance. Requests for special priorities assistance should be timely, *i.e.,* the request has been submitted promptly and enough time exists for HHS, or the Delegate Agency to affect a meaningful resolution to the problem, and must establish that: ( a ) There is an urgent need for the item; and
( b ) The applicant has made a reasonable effort to resolve the problem.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 89 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. J. RES. 89

To direct the termination of the use of United States Armed Forces for 
  the construction, maintenance, and operation of the Joint Logistics 
 Over-the-Shore pier on the coast of the Gaza Strip that has not been 
                        authorized by Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 23, 2024

     Mr. Cruz (for himself, Mr. Scott of Florida, Mr. Cornyn, Mrs. 
 Blackburn, and Mr. Braun) introduced the following joint resolution; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
To direct the termination of the use of United States Armed Forces for 
  the construction, maintenance, and operation of the Joint Logistics 
 Over-the-Shore pier on the coast of the Gaza Strip that has not been 
                        authorized by Congress.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TERMINATION OF USE OF UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES FOR 
              CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE, AND OPERATION OF THE JOINT 
              LOGISTICS OVER-THE-SHORE PIER ON THE COAST OF THE GAZA 
              STRIP.

    (a) In General.--Congress hereby directs the President to terminate 
the use of United States Armed Forces for the construction, 
maintenance, and operation of the Joint Logistics Over-the-Shore pier 
on the coast of the Gaza Strip by not later than the date that is 30 
days after the date of the adoption of this joint resolution (unless 
the President requests, and Congress authorizes, a later date) unless 
specific authorization for such use of United States Armed Forces has 
been enacted.
    (b) Rule of Construction.--Nothing in this joint resolution shall 
be construed as limiting cooperation between United States Armed Forces 
and the State of Israel.
                                 <all>
```
§ 1355.39 Administrative and judicial review. A title IV-E agency determined not to be in substantial conformity with titles IV-B and IV-E plan requirements, or a title IV-E agency or an entity in violation of section 471(a)(18) of the Act: ( a ) May appeal, pursuant to 45 CFR part 16, the final determination and any subsequent withholding of, or reduction in, funds to the HHS Departmental Appeals Board within 60 days after receipt of a notice of nonconformity described in § 1355.36(e)(1) of this part, or receipt of a notice of noncompliance by ACF as described in § 1355.38(a)(3) of this part; and
( b ) Will have the opportunity to obtain judicial review of an adverse decision of the Departmental Appeals Board within 60 days after the title IV-E agency or entity receives notice of the decision by the Board. Appeals of adverse Department Appeals Board decisions must be made to the district court of the United States for the judicial district in which the principal or headquarters office of the agency responsible for administering the program is located.
( c ) The procedure described in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section will not apply to a finding that a title IV-E agency or an entity has been determined to be in violation of section 471(a)(18) which is based on a judicial decision.
[65 FR 4083, Jan. 25, 2000, as amended at 77 FR 932, Jan. 6, 2012]
RESOLUTIONS

CALENDAR 

NO.

S. RES. 

NO.

SUBJECT 

REPORTED 

BY

1

 
TREATIES

CALENDAR 

NO.

TREATY

DOC. NO.

SUBJECT 

REPORTED 

BY

2

 
* Signifies nominee’s commitment to respond to requests to appear and testify before any duly constituted committee of the Senate 

NOMINATIONS

CALENDAR 

NO.

MESSAGE

NO.

NOMINEE, OFFICE, AND PREDECESSOR REPORTED 

BY

3

 [NEW REPORTS] 

NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS 

ADMINISTRATION 

* 9 113 Allen Weinstein, of Maryland, to be Archivist of 

the United States, vice John W. Carlin. 

Feb 07, 2005 Reported by Ms. 

Collins, Committee on 

Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs, without 

printed report. 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY 

* 10 122 Michael Chertoff, of New Jersey, to be Secretary 

of Homeland Security, vice Thomas J. Ridge, 

resigned. 

Feb 07, 2005 Reported by Ms. 

Collins, Committee on 

Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs, without 

printed report.
§ 1206.1-3 Definitions. As used in this subpart— ( a ) The term *Corporation* means the Corporation for National and Community Service established pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 12651 and includes each Corporation State Office and Service Center.
( b ) The term *CEO* means the Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation.
( c ) The term *responsible Corporation official* means the CEO, Chief Financial Officer, the Director of the National Senior Service Corps programs, the appropriate Service Center Director and any Corporation for National and Community Service (CNCS) Headquarters or State office official who is authorized to make the grant or assistance in question. In addition to the foregoing officials, in the case of the suspension proceedings described in § 1206.1-4, the term “responsible Corporation official” shall also include a designee of a CNCS official who is authorized to make the grant of assistance in question.
( d ) The term *assistance* means assistance under title II of the DVSA in the form of grants or contracts involving Federal funds for the administration for which the Director of the National Senior Service Corps programs has responsibility.
( e ) The term *recipient* means a public or private agency, institution or organization or a State or other political jurisdiction which has received assistance under title II of the DVSA. The term “recipient” does not include individuals who ultimately receive benefits under any DVSA program of assistance or National Senior Service Corps volunteers participating in any program.
( f ) The term *agency* means a public or private agency, institution, or organization or a State or other political jurisdiction with which the recipient has entered into an arrangement, contract or agreement to assist in its carrying out the development, conduct and administration of part of a project or program assisted under title II of the DVSA.
( g ) The term *party* in the case of a termination hearing means the Corporation, the recipient concerned, and any other agency or organization which has a right or which has been granted permission by the presiding officer to participate in a hearing concerning termination of financial assistance to the recipient pursuant to § 1206.1-5(e).
( h ) The term *termination* means any action permanently terminating or curtailing assistance to all or any part of a program prior to the time that such assistance is concluded by the grant or contract terms and conditions, but does not include the refusal to provide new or additional assistance.
( i ) The term *suspension* means any action temporarily suspending or curtailing assistance in whole or in part, to all or any part of a program, prior to the time that such assistance is concluded by the grant or contract terms and conditions, but does not include the refusal to provide new or additional assistance.
[69 FR 19110, Apr. 12, 2004, as amended at 80 FR 63457, Oct. 20, 2015]
# The Attorney General of Texas August 1, 1980 MARK WHITE Attorney General Honorable Gibson D.(Gib)Lewis Chairman Committee onIntergovernmental Affairs House ofRepresentatives Austin, Texas Opinion No. MW-214 Re: Authority of the Board of Regents of North Texas State University to designate the chief executive officer of the University aschancellor Dear Representative Lewis: Youhave requested our opinion regarding the authority ofthe Board of Regents of North Texas State University to designate the chief executive officer ofthe university as chancellor. Section 105.74ofthe Education Code provides:

The chief executive officer of the university shall serve as chief executive officer of the college of osteopathic medicine. The title to be conferred on the chief executive officer is not fixed by statute. The Board ofRegents ofNorth Texas State University has:

[w]ith respect to the management and control of the university

... the same powers and duties that are conferred on the Board of Regents, State Senior Colleges, with respect to institutions inthat system. Education Code S105.41. The Board of Regents, State Senior Colleges, “is responsible for the general control and management of the universities in the system,” and, pursuant to such authority, it may:

employ and discharge presidents or principals, teachers, treasurers, and other employees. Education Code 595.21. (Emphasis added).

P. 684Honorable Gibson D.(Gib)Lewis - Page Two (MW-214)

In Attorney General Opinion MW-64(1979),we said that the Coordinating Board and aboard ofregents were prohibited from changing the statutorily established name of an institution. Inthe present instance, however, the chief executive officer has no statutorily established title. As a result, we believe that the Board ofRegents, acting under its general authority to employ officials, may designate its chief executive officer as chancellor, so long as that individual is the chief executive officer of both North Texas State University and the College ofOsteopathic Medicine. SUMMARY The Board of Regents of North Texas State University may validly designate the chief executive officer ofthe university as chancellor.

Attorney General ofTexas JOHN W.FAINTER, JR. First Assistant Attorney General

Prepared byRick Gilpin Assistant Attorney General APPROVED: OPINION COMMITTEE C. Robert Heath, Chairman Jon Bible Susan Garrison Rick Gilpin Ann Kraatz

P. 685
<PAGE>

                                                                     Exhibit 4.7

Kemper Investors Life Insurance Company
1 Kemper Drive, Long Grove, Illinois 60049-0001


457 DEFERRED COMPENSATION RIDER


This Rider is a part of the contract or certificate to which it is attached. It
amends the contract in order for it to qualify under IRC Section 457. IRC means
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended from time to time.

SECTION 1: OWNERSHIP

The annuitant is the participant in a 457 plan. The owner is the employer that
maintains the plan. Prior to the distribution of the annuitant's interest, all
property and rights will remain those of the employer, except if the next
section applies.

SECTION 2: EXCLUSIVE BENEFIT

This section applies if the contract or certificate is held by: a state; or a
political subdivision of a State. In that case, in accordance with 457(g), all
assets and income under the contract or certificate are held for the exclusive
benefit of: the annuitant(s); and the beneficiaries of the annuitant(s).

Signed for the Kemper Investors Life Insurance Company at its home office in
Long Grove, Illinois.




               /s/ Debra P. Rezabek               /s/ Gale K. Caruso

                Secretary                         President

L-8341
No. *5266.*

#### R. L. Brannon *v.*The State.

1. Practice—Transfer of Causes from the District to the County Court—Substantial compliance with the statute regulating the transfer of causes from the district to the county courts (Code Crim Proe , art. 435) is all that is required in such proceedings.

2. Carryino A Pistol.—Upon his trial for unlawfully carrying a pistol, the accused sought to exculpate himself under the exception to the statute, that the pistol was carried on his own premises. The proof was that the premises on which the pistol was carried was the joint inheritance of the wife of the accused and one M., but that it was occupied by M., and not by the accused or his wife. *Held*that the proof did not bring the premises within the exception.

Appeal from the County Court of Milam. Tried' below before the Hon. A. T. Terral, County Judge.

The conviction in this case was for unlawfully carrying a pistol. The penalty assessed was a fine of twenty-five dollars. The opinion sufficiently discloses the case.

*A.*6r. *Wilcox,*for the appellant.

*W. L. Davidson,*Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

White, Presiding Judge.

The transfer of this cause from the district to the county court is, to say the least of it, in substantial compliance with the statute, and that is all that is required. (Code Crim. Proc., art. 435; Gen. Laws 17th Legislature, Eeg. Sess. 1881, p. *2;*7 Texas Ct. App., 83; 11 Id., 114; Id., 143.)

Appellant was convicted for unlawfully carrying a pistol. It is shown by the evidence that defendant had married a daughter of a man named Martin, who died leaving a tract of land of two hundred acres, which was jointly inherited by his four children, one of whom was appellant’s wife, and these children had each a common undivided interest in the land. Appellant cultivated a portion of the land, and lived on a different tract of land from that upon which the old Martin homestead was *429situated. This old homestead was occupied by Dick Martin, a brother of defendant’s wife.

Opinion delivered June 1, 1887.

The first witness for the State says defendant “had his pistol on the Martin farm, and near the old Martin homestead. * * Defendant came galloping up, jumped down off his horse, and got off over into the yard, and drew his pistol and shot twice at Mr. Harrell.” Appellant claimed that, inasmuch as the title of the land was held in common by his wife and the other heirs, he was on his own premises (Rev. Stat., art. 2851), and therefore had committed no violation of law under the exception named in Article 319 of the Penal Code, to that effect, and he requested a special instruction presenting that view of the case, which was qualified by the court. We see no error in the qualification added by the court. He was not on his own premises in contemplation of law. (15 Texas Ct. App., 23.)

There is no reversible error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

*Affirmed.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          31,585
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           7,279
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                12,455
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    113,230
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          32,860
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            32,288
<LOANS>                                        479,392
<ALLOWANCE>                                      9,028
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 703,542
<DEPOSITS>                                     612,362
<SHORT-TERM>                                       537
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             10,870
<LONG-TERM>                                     25,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,162
<OTHER-SE>                                      47,611
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 703,542
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 39,010
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                6,228
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 1,876
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                47,114
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              17,932
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,999
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           27,183
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    6,778
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 20,473
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,151
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       5,151
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,301
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.47
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.64
<LOANS-NON>                                      3,155
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 7,537
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    6,473
<RECOVERIES>                                     1,186
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                9,028
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             6,388
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          2,640


</TABLE>
SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

ONE HUNDRED EIGHTH CONGRESS

FIRST SESSION { CONVENED JANUARY 7, 2003

SECOND SESSION {

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR

Thursday, January 30, 2003

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF EMILY J. REYNOLDS,

SECRETARY OF THE SENATE

By Michelle Haynes, Executive Clerk

Issue No. 7
UNANIMOUS CONSENT AGREEMENT

Ordered, That on Thursday, January 20, 2003, at a time determined by the Majority Leader, with the

concurrence of the Democratic Leader, the Senate proceed to executive session and that the nomination of Gordon

England, of Texas, to be Deputy Secretary of Homeland Security be discharged from the Committee on

Governmental Affairs;

Ordered further, That the Senate then proceed to its consideration; there be 20 minutes of debate equally

divided between the Chairman (Ms. Collins) and the Ranking member (Mr. Lieberman);

Ordered further, That following the use or yielding back of time the Senate proceed to a vote on the

confirmation, with no intervening action or debate; further, that following the vote the President be immediately

notified of the Senate’s action, and the Senate then resume legislative session.

(January 29, 2003)
CALENDAR

NO.

EX.RES

NO. SUBJECT

REPORTED

BY

RESOLUTIONS

1
CALENDAR

NO.

TREATY

DOC. NO. SUBJECT

REPORTED

BY

TREATIES

2
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH

REVIEW COMMISSION

* 17 81 Stanley C. Suboleski, of Virginia, to be a Member

of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review

Commission for a term of six years expiring

August 30, 2006, vice Marc Lincoln Marks,

term expired.

Jan 23, 2003 Reported by Mr.

Gregg, Committee on Health,

Education, Labor, and Pensions,

without printed report.

OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH

REVIEW COMMISSION

* 18 82 W. Scott Railton, of Virginia, to be a Member of

the Occupational Safety and Health Review

Commission for a term expiring April 27, 2007,

vice Gary L. Visscher, term expired.

Jan 23, 2003 Reported by Mr.

Gregg, Committee on Health,

Education, Labor, and Pensions,

without printed report.

* Signifies nominee’s commitment to respond to requests to appear and testify before any duly constituted committee of the Senate

NOMINATIONS

CALENDAR

NO.

MESSAGE

NO. NOMINEE, OFFICE, AND PREDECESSOR

REPORTED

BY

3
NOMINATIONS PLACED ON THE SECRETARY’S DESK

4