alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 156.215 Advance payments of the premium tax credit and cost-sharing reduction standards. ( a ) *Standards relative to advance payments of the premium tax credit and cost-sharing reductions.* In order for a health plan to be certified as a QHP initially and to maintain certification to be offered in the individual market on the Exchange, the issuer must meet the requirements related to the administration of cost-sharing reductions and advance payments of the premium tax credit set forth in subpart E of this part.
( b ) [Reserved]
[78 FR 15535, Mar. 11, 2013]
EX-35 (b)
WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK

OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

Re: The servicing agreement dated as of June 1, 2004 (as amended, the
"Agreement"), among Washington Mutual Bank, FA as Servicer and Greenwich
Capital Financial Products, Inc., as Owner, with respect to ZUNI MORTGAGE LOAN
TRUST 2006-0A1, "ZUNI 2006-0A1" (the "Securitization").

I, H. John Berens, a Senior Vice President of Washington Mutual Bank (the
"Servicer"), certify to the Owner, the Depositor and the Master Servicer
under the Securitization, the following for the 2006 fiscal year (the "Relevant
Year"):

1. A review of the activities of the Servicer during the Relevant Year and of
performance under the Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has
fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement in all material
respects throughout the Relevant Year.

Dated as of February 22, 2007.

/s/ H. John Berens
Name: H. John Berens
Title: Senior Vice President
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-20556 Conference Calendar

DAVID EARL WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus GARY JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-96-CV-904

- - - - - - - - - - February 11, 1998 Before SMITH, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * The district court dismissed as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) the 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint filed by David Earl Williams, Texas inmate # 652854. Williams appeals, but does not challenge the basis for the district court’s dismissal. This court will not raise and discuss legal issues that the appellant has failed to assert. When an appellant fails to identify any error in the district court's analysis, it is the same as if the appellant had not appealed that judgment.No. 97-20556 -2- Brinkmann v. Dallas County Deputy Sheriff Abner , 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987). Because Williams does not address on appeal the district court's reasons for dismissing the complaint, he has abandoned the only issue on appeal before this court. Id. Williams’ appeal is without arguable merit and is frivolous.
See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. We caution Williams that any additional frivolous appeals filed by him or on his behalf will invite the imposition of sanctions. To avoid sanctions, Williams is further cautioned to review any pending appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are frivolous.
APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
EXHIBIT 23.3

[LETTERHEAD OF MILLER AND LENTS, LTD. APPEARS HERE]

March 2, 2006

XTO Energy Inc.

810 Houston Street

Fort Worth, TX 76102

Re:

XTO Energy Inc.2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K


Gentlemen:

The firm of Miller and Lents, Ltd., consents to the use of its name and to the use of its report dated February 20, 2006, regarding the XTO Energy
Inc. Proved Reserves and Future Net Revenues as of December 31, 2005, in the 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Miller and Lents, Ltd.,
has no interests in XTO Energy Inc. or in any affiliated companies or subsidiaries and is not to receive any such interest as payment for such reports and has no director, officer, or employee otherwise connected with XTO Energy Inc. We are not
employed by XTO Energy Inc. on a contingent basis.



Yours very truly,MILLER AND LENTS, LTD.By

/S/ JAMES PEARSONJames PearsonChairman
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Primus Knowledge Solutions, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ronald M. Stevens, Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                                                              
|--------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Ronald M. Stevens                                         
|Ronald M. Stevens                                             
|Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
|August 6, 2004                                                



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
BILLING CODE: 6715-01-M

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE:

THURSDAY, JULY 25, 2019 AT 10:00 A.M.

PLACE:

1050 FIRST STREET, N.E., WASHINGTON, D.C. (12TH FLOOR)

STATUS:

THIS MEETING WILL BE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Internet Ad Disclaimers Rulemaking Proposal for REG 2011-02 (Internet 

Communication Disclaimers and Definition of “Public Communication”)

Draft Advisory Opinion 2019-10: Price for Congress

Draft Advisory Opinion 2019-11: Pro-Life Democratic Candidate PAC

Draft Advisory Opinion 2019-13: Mary Jennings Hegar & MJ for Texas

Draft Advisory Opinion 2019-14: Arizona Libertarian Party

Notice of Availability for REG 2019-01 (Adding Valuable Information to 

Definition of Contribution)

Audit Division Recommendation Memorandum on the Ambulatory 

Surgery Center Association PAC (ASCAPAC)(A17-08)

Management and Administrative Matters

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Judith Ingram, Press Officer

Telephone: (202) 694-1220

Individuals who plan to attend and require special assistance, such as sign language 

interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should contact Laura E. Sinram,

Acting Secretary and Clerk, at (202)694-1040, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting 

date.

Authority: Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b

Signed: _____________________________________

Laura E. Sinram 

Acting Secretary and Clerk of the Commission

Submitted: July 17, 2019
§ 1171.10 Administrative appeals. ( a ) You may appeal a denial of your request for NEH records (except NEH OIG records) and/or FCAH records to The Deputy Chairman, National Endowment for the Humanities, 400 7th Street SW., Room 4053, Washington, DC 20506. You may also send your appeal to the NEH General Counsel by facsimile at 202-606-8600, by email at *gencounsel@neh.gov ,* or through the NEH's electronic FOIA request system, which is available on the NEH Web site at *www.neh.gov .* For a denial of your request for OIG records, you may appeal by facsimile at 202-606-8329, by email at *oig@neh.gov* or by mail to The Inspector General, National Endowment for the Humanities, 400 7th Street SW., Room 2200, Washington, DC 20506. Your appeal must be in writing and received by NEH within ninety (90) days of the date of the letter denying your request in whole or in part. Your appeal letter must clearly identify the NEH decision that you are appealing and contain the tracking number, if assigned. You should clearly mark your appeal letter and envelope “Freedom of Information Act Appeal.”
( b ) *Responses to appeals.* The Deputy Chairman (or designee) or the Inspector General (or designee) will make a written determination on your appeal within twenty (20) days (weekends and Federal holidays excluded) after the agency receives your appeal, except as provided by 1171.7(d). If the appeal decision affirms the denial of your request, the NEH will notify you in writing of the reason(s) for the decision, including the applicable FOIA exemption(s), and inform you of the FOIA provisions for court review of the decision. If the denial of your request is reversed or modified, in whole or in part, the NEH will reprocess your request in accordance with that appeal decision and notify you of that decision in writing. A response to an appeal will advise the requester that the 2007 amendments to FOIA created the Office of Government Information Services (OGIS) to offer mediation services to resolve disputes between FOIA requesters and Federal agencies as a non-exclusive alternative to litigation. A requester may contact OGIS in any of the following ways: Office of Government Information Services, National Archives and Records Administration, 8601 Adelphi Road—OGIS, College Park, MD 20740; *https://ogis.archives.gov ;* email: *ogis@nara.gov ;* telephone: 202-741-5770; facsimile: 202-741-5769; toll-free: 1-877-684-6448.
( c ) *When appeal is required.* If you wish to seek review by a court of any denial by the NEH, you must first submit a timely administrative appeal to the NEH.
[79 FR 9415, Feb. 19, 2014, as amended at 80 FR 42066, July 16, 2015; 82 FR 46, Jan. 3, 2017]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

MONICA FRISBY ,
Plaintiff Below , Appellant,

v.

NATIONAL STORAGE AFFILIATES (NSA/ISTORAGE) , and CEO ARLEN D. NORDHAGEN,

Defendants Below , Appellee s

. § § No. 554 , 2019 § § § § Court Below

– Superior Court § of the State of Delaware § § C.A. No. N19M

- 07

- 068 § § § § §

Submitted: January 17, 2020 Decided: January 23 , 2020

Before SEITZ , Chief Justice; TRAYNOR and MONTGOMERY

- REEVES
, Justices

.
O R DE R
Upon consideration of the notice to show caus e and the appellant’s response,
it appears to the Court that:
(1) On December 26, 2019 , the appellant , Monica Frisby , filed a notice of
appeal from a benc h ruling issued by the Superior Court on December 18, 2019, 1
which granted Frisby’s request to have access to her storage unit at the defendants’

1 The Superior Court issued a written order memorializing its bench ruling on January 6, 2020.2

facility for thirty days and ordered the case to be dismissed after the expiration of
the thirty

- day period unless further disputes between the parties arose

. The Superior
Court docket reflects that the case has not yet been dismissed

. (2) The Senior Court Clerk issued a notice directing Frisby to show cause
why her appeal should not be dismissed for her fai lure to comply with Supreme
Court Rule 42 in taking an appeal from an interlocutory order. Frisby filed a
response to the notice to show cause, but it does not address the interlocutory nature
of the appeal.
(3) “An order is deemed final when the trial co urt has declared its intention

that the order is the court’s final act in a case.” 2 Here, Frisby filed her appeal before
the Superior Court dismissed the case

. T he Superior Court’s ruling is therefore
interlocutory.
(4) Absent compliance with Supreme Cou rt Rule 42, the appellate
jurisdiction of this Court is limited to the review of final orders. Frisby’s failure to
comply with Supreme Court Rule 42 leaves this Court without jurisdiction to hear
her interlocutory appeal. The filing fee for any future ap peal from the Superior
Court’s final judgment shall be waived.

2 Pollard v. The Placers, Inc. , 692 A.2d 879, 880 (D el. 1997).3

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED , under Supreme Court

Rule 2 9 (b), that the appeal is DISMISSED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ G ary F

. T raynor Justice
###### Editorial Note on Part 1303

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1303 appear at 89 FR 67816, Aug. 21, 2024.

#### § 1303.53 Copies of documents.

A grant recipient must submit to the responsible HHS official, within 10 days after filing or execution, copies of deeds, leases, loan instruments, mortgage agreements, notices of federal interest, and other legal documents related to the use of Head Start funds for purchase, construction, major renovation, or the discharge of any debt secured by the facility.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Housing Finance Board

# Time and Date:

The open meeting of the Board of Directors is scheduled to begin at 10 a.m. on Wednesday, November 8, 2006. 

# Place:

Board Room, First Floor, Federal Housing Finance Board, 1625 Eye Street, NW., Washington, DC 20006. 

# Status:

The meeting will be open to the public. 

# Matter to Be Considered at the Open Portion:

*Federal Home Loan Bank of Chicago Request to Redeem Excess Stock.*

# Contact Person for More Information:

                        Shelia Willis, Paralegal  Specialist, Office of General Counsel, at 202-408-2876 or                         *williss@fhfb.gov*.                     

Dated: November 8, 2006.

By the Federal Housing Finance Board. 

John P. Kennedy, 

General Counsel. 

[FR Doc. 06-9098 Filed 11-2-06; 10:58 am] 

BILLING CODE 6725-01-P
§ 1326.85 Filing and service of papers. ( a ) All papers in the proceedings must be filed with the designated individual in an original and two copies. Only the originals of exhibits and transcripts of testimony need be filed.
( b ) Copies of papers in the proceedings must be served on all parties by personal delivery or by mail. Service on the party's designated representative is deemed service upon the party.
#### In the Matter of the Accounting of Frederick H. Stevens et al., as Trustees under the Will of Julia A. Brooks, Deceased, Respondents. Clare A. Pickard, as Special Guardian of Jesse B. Nichols, Appellant.

(Argued April 3, 1907;

decided April 23, 1907.)

*Matter of Stevens,*114 App. Div. 607, affirmed.

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered July 12, 190G, which reversed that portion of a decree of the Chautauqua County Surrogate’s Court granting an allowance to the special guardian of Jesse B. Nichols in the above-entitled proceeding.

*Frank W. Stevens, Benjamin S. Dean*and *Glare A. Pickard*for appellant.

*George A. Lewis*for respondents.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., O’Brien, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Hiscock and Chase, JJ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

      ( print page 66919)    

# TIME AND DATE: 

11 a.m., Friday, December 1, 2006.

# PLACE: 

1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission Conference Room.

# STATUS: 

Closed.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

Surveillance Matters.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Eileen A. Donovan, 202-418-5100.

Eileen A. Donovan,

Acting Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 06-9284  Filed 11-15-06; 3:32 pm]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
§ 1233.9 How does the Director receive and respond to comments? ( a ) The Director follows the procedures in § 1233.10 if: ( 1 ) A state office or official is designated to act as a single point of contact between a state process and all federal agencies, and
( 2 ) That office or official transmits a state process recommendation for a program selected under § 1233.6.
( b ) ( 1 ) The single point of contact is not obligated to transmit comments from state, areawide, regional or local officials and entities where there is no state process recommendation.
( 2 ) If a state process recommendation is transmitted by a single point of contact, all comments from state, areawide, regional, and local officials and entities that differ from it must also be transmitted.
( c ) If a state has not established a process, or is unable to submit a state process recommendation, state, areawide, regional and local officials and entities may submit comments either to the applicant or to the Agency, or both.
( d ) If a program is not selected for a state process, state, areawide, regional and local officials and entities may submit comments either to the applicant or to the Agency, or both. In addition, if a state process recommendation for a nonselected program is transmitted to the Agency by the single point of contact, the Director follows the prodecures of § 1233.10 of this part.
( e ) The Director considers comments which do not constitute a state process recommendation submitted under these regulations and for which the Director is not required to apply the procedures of § 1233.10 of this part, when such comments are provided by a single point of contact, by the applicant, or directly to the Agency by a commenting party.
§ 101.61 Rating Authorizations. ( a ) A Rating Authorization is an official action granting specific priority rating authority that: ( 1 ) Permits a person to place a priority rating on an order for an item or service not normally ratable under this part; or
( 2 ) Authorizes a person to modify a priority rating on a specific order or series of contracts or orders.
( b ) To request priority rating authority, see § 101.41.
From: Eric Poggemiller

To: CELA

Cc: Christal Dennis

Subject: MUR No. 8058 - Request for Extension

Date: Wednesday, October 5, 2022 5:01:16 PM

To the General Counsel’s Office

On behalf of respondents SQI Limited, LLC, Herzog Contracting Corp., Herzog

Transit Services, Inc., and Herzog Technologies, Inc., in the above-referenced

matter, we request one additional 30-day extension to file a response from the

deadline of October 12, 2022. We are continuing to conduct an internal review of

all matters raised in the complaint and to gather relevant background facts and

information from our clients to thoroughly prepare a response. We do not

anticipate requiring any further extensions beyond this one. The brief requested

extension of time will have no practical bearing on the operation of the statute of

limitations in this matter. Please advise if the request is granted, and we will

plan accordingly. Thank you for your consideration.

Eric J. Poggemiller

Rouse, Frets & Davison, LLC

700 S. Riverside Road, Suite 200

St. Joseph, Missouri 64507

Phone: 816.364.4044

Fax: 816.364.6396

MUR805800041
SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

ONE HUNDRED EIGHTH CONGRESS

FIRST SESSION { CONVENED JANUARY 7, 2003

SECOND SESSION {

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR

Wednesday, January 29, 2003

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF EMILY J. REYNOLDS,

SECRETARY OF THE SENATE

By Michelle Haynes, Executive Clerk

Issue No. 6

CALENDAR

NO.

EX.RES

NO. SUBJECT

REPORTED

BY

RESOLUTIONS

1
CALENDAR

NO.

TREATY

DOC. NO. SUBJECT

REPORTED

BY

TREATIES

2
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH

REVIEW COMMISSION

* 17 81 Stanley C. Suboleski, of Virginia, to be a Member

of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review

Commission for a term of six years expiring

August 30, 2006, vice Marc Lincoln Marks,

term expired.

Jan 23, 2003 Reported by Mr.

Gregg, Committee on Health,

Education, Labor, and Pensions,

without printed report.

OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH

REVIEW COMMISSION

* 18 82 W. Scott Railton, of Virginia, to be a Member of

the Occupational Safety and Health Review

Commission for a term expiring April 27, 2007,

vice Gary L. Visscher, term expired.

Jan 23, 2003 Reported by Mr.

Gregg, Committee on Health,

Education, Labor, and Pensions,

without printed report.

* Signifies nominee’s commitment to respond to requests to appear and testify before any duly constituted committee of the Senate

NOMINATIONS

CALENDAR

NO.

MESSAGE

NO. NOMINEE, OFFICE, AND PREDECESSOR

REPORTED

BY

3
NOMINATIONS PLACED ON THE SECRETARY’S DESK

4
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 223 (Monday, November 20, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67128-67129]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9261]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information 
Technology, American Health Information Community Quality Workgroup

ACTION:  Announcement of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the third meeting of the American Health 
Information Community Quality Workgroup in accordance with the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. No. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.)

DATES: December 13, 2006, from 1 p.m. to 4 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Mary C. Switzer Building (330 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 
20201), Conference Room 4090 (you will need a photo ID to enter a 
Federal building).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: http://www.hhs.gov/healthit/ahic/quality_main.html.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: During the meeting, the Workgroup will 
continue their discussion on a core set of quality measures and on the 
specific charge to the Workgroup. The Workgroup members will also 
participate in a facilitated process intended to envision and describe 
a world in which quality measurement and reporting are automated and 
clinical decision support is used to improve performance on

[[Page 67129]]

those quality measures. This shared vision will be used to inform the 
future work of the Workgroup.
    The meeting will be available via internet access. For additional 
information, go to http://www.hhs.gov/healthit/ahic/quality_instruct.html.

    Dated: November 7, 2006.
Judith Sparrow,
Director, American Health Information Community, Office of Programs and 
Coordination, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information 
Technology.
[FR Doc. 06-9261 Filed 11-17-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150-24-M