alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001068105
<NAME> WESTFORD ACQUISITION CORPORATION
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                             500
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     575
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       5000000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       575
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      0.0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      0.0
        

</TABLE>
INVESTIGATIVE SUMMARY I22INV00035 DATE: December 14, 2022

Allegation of Improper Hiring Practices in the Office of General Counsel

The Federal Election Commission (FEC) Office of the Inspector General (OIG) received an 

anonymous hotline complaint that alleged improprieties concerning a recent hiring action for a 

vacant position within the Office of General Counsel (OGC). The complaint alleged that OGC 

failed to follow proper procedures in recruiting for the position. Specifically, the complaint 

alleged the vacancy was not competed, was not posted on USAJOBS, and that OGC did not 

solicit interest in the position on an acting basis as has purportedly become the customary 

practice within OGC. 

The OIG initiated an investigation after receiving the allegation. Since the complaint was 

anonymous, the OIG was unable to contact the complainant for additional details. As such, the 

OIG conducted the inquiry with the information provided in the complaint. The OIG inquiry 

found no evidence to substantiate the allegations. 

In the course of reviewing the facts and circumstances surrounding the hiring action in 

question, the OIG obtained and reviewed relevant records, and interviewed the Human 

Resources (HR) Director. The HR Director’s testimony, which was corroborated by the relevant 

records, established that the selection for the vacancy generally followed applicable federal 

guidelines and internal policies for federal hiring. 

Specifically, the OIG found that HR followed customary practices and posted the vacancy 

announcements on USAJOBS months prior to the selection for the position. Moreover, contrary 

to the allegation that OGC did not solicit interest on an acting basis, the OIG found that OGC 

made multiple email announcements to all staff for temporary detail opportunities related to the 

position. 

Accordingly, the OIG found no evidence to support the complaint and closed this matter with 

no recommendations for FEC management.
#### Catherine Atkins *vs.*George Atkins and Alfred Atkins, exrs., et als.

May Term, 1899.

Present: Rowell, Munson, Start, Thompson and Watson, JJ.

Opinion filed July 21, 1899.

*Application of Payments.*— The rule is well settled in this State that general payments and credits will be applied to extinguish indebtednesses in the order of time in which they accrued.

Chancery. At the March term, 1899, Chittenden county, before Taft, Chancellor, the case came on for hearing under á mandate of the supreme court and the report of the master filed in pursuance thereof; whereupon it was adjudged that the oratrix recover of the defendant the sum of $4,719.96 with interest since March 8, 1899, which the defendant was to pay within sixty days with costs, and in default thereof the notes and mortgage described in the bill were to become the property of the oratrix in payment *pro tanto*of the sums decreed. The oratrix appealed.

One contention of the oratrix was that the payments applied by the Chancellor in reduction of her claim should have been treated as payments toward her share as legatee in the estate of Hiram Atkins.

*C. G. Austin*and *H. A. Burt*for the oratrix.

Dillingham, *Huse & Howland*for the executors.

Thompson, J.

This case does not involve the settlement of the estate of Hiram Atkins, deceased, now pending in the probate court. Whatever maybe the rights of the oratrix in the settlement of that estate, it is left for that court to determine.

The right of the oratrix to the $5000 received on policy No. 156,000 issued by the New York Life Insurance *423Company and to $684.94 received on policy No. 4967 issued by the National Life Insurance Company, and the manner in which the defendants should account therefor, was determined when this case was before this court as reported in 70 Yt. 565.

The only question for decision is as to how payments shall be applied which were made by the defendants to the oratrix, without any direction as to their application, and which have not been applied. From the time the defendants received on said policies the sums of money held to belong to the oratrix such sums were due and owing from them to her. They were the first indebtedness in order of time, if any other existed, from them to her. The rule is well settled in this state, that general payments and credits will be applied to extinguish indebtednesses in the order of time in which they accrued. *Morgan*v. *Tarbell,*28 Vt. 498; *Pierce*v. Knight, 31 Vt. 701; *St. Albans*v. *Failey,*46 Vt. 448. This is the rule adopted by the court of chancery in making the decree from which this appeal was taken. The decree in this respect was in accordance with the law, and upon the facts disclosed was equitable as between the parties.

*Decree affirmed with costs to the defendants and case remanded to the court oj chancery.*
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on October 12, 2006, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), On-Board Equipment Collaboration (“OBEC”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the identities of the parties to the venture and (2) the nature and objectives of the venture. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.                

Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, the identities of the parties to the venture are: BMW of North America, Inc., Woodcliff Lake, NJ; DaimlerChrysler Research and Technology North America, Inc., Palo Alto, CA; Delphi Corporation, Troy MI; ProSyst Software GmbH, GERMANY; Sirit Technology, Inc., Carrollton, TX; Volkswagen of America, Inc., Auburn Hills, MI; and DENSO International America, Inc., Southfield, MI. The general area of OBEC's planned activity is implementation of a vehicle on-board equipment subsystem as part of the development and deployment of a national infrastructure to enable data collection and exchange in real time between vehicles and between vehicles and the roadway.

Patricia A. Brink,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 06-9360 Filed 11-22-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
§ 150.427 Form and service of submissions. ( a ) Every submission filed with the ALJ must be filed electronically and include: ( 1 ) A caption on the first page, setting forth the title of the case, the docket number (if known), and a description of the submission (such as “Motion for Discovery”).
( 2 ) The signatory's name, address, and telephone number.
( 3 ) A signed certificate of service, specifying each address to which a copy of the submission is sent, the date on which it is sent, and the method of service.
( b ) A party filing a submission with the ALJ must, at the time of filing, serve a copy of such submission on the opposing party. An intervenor filing a submission with the ALJ must, at the time of filing, serve a copy of the submission on all parties. If a party is represented by an attorney, service must be made on the attorney. An electronically filed submission is considered served on all parties using the electronic filing system.
[64 FR 45795, Aug. 20, 1999, as amended at 86 FR 24286, May 5, 2021]
#### The Ovington Brothers Company, Appellant, *v.*Cornelia M. Henshaw, Individually and as Executrix of Sarah Gracie, Deceased, Respondent.

*Ovington Bros. Co.*v. *Henshaw, 115*App. Div. 886, affirmed.

(Submitted October *17,*1907;

decided November 19, 1907.)

Appeal from a judgment, entered October 24, 1906, upon an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, which affirmed an interlocutory judgment of Special Term sustaining a demurrer to the complaint in an action by a tenant to recover from the landlord the value of buildings erected on the demised premises during the lease.

*George S. Ingraham*for appellant.

*II. G. M. Ingraham*and *Edgar M. Doughty*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Cli. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Hiscock, JJ.
CERTIFICATIONS
EX-31.1   CERTIFICATIONS OF CEO PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

I, Ronald J. Chapman, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of ASI Entertainment,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: May 10, 2007

/s/ Ronald J. Chapman

Ronald J. Chapman
Chief Executive Officer


                                    - 1 -
<PAGE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM MAXYGEN,
INC.'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FROM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         213,923
<SECURITIES>                                     9,995
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,087
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               231,156
<PP&E>                                           6,804
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,596
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 284,586
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,519
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             3
<OTHER-SE>                                     270,361
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   284,586
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,569
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                27,944
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 108
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (9,984)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (9,984)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (9,984)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.34)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.34)


</TABLE>
SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NINETY-EIGHTH CONGRESS 

Convened January 3, 1983 

FIRST SESSION { 

SECOND SESSION { 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Tuesday, September 13, 1983 

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF WILLIAM F. HILDENBRAND, 

SECRETARY OF THE SENATE 

By Gerald A. Hackett, Executive Clerk 
MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION 

Mar. 8, 1983-- Motion entered to reconsider the vote by which the resolution of 

ratification to the Montreal Protocols No. 3 and 4 (Ex. B., 95-1) was defeated--Mr. 

Baker. 
1 

TREATIES 

-

Calendar Treaty SubJect Reported 

No. Doc. No. Bv 

1 EX. B, Montreal Aviation Protocols Nos. 3 and 4 Feb 10 83 Reported 

95-1 favorably, by Mr. Percy, 

Committee on Foreign 

Relations, with a proposed 

resolution of advice and 

consent to ratification 

with conditions (Printed 

renort-Ex. Rent. 98-1) 
2 

NOMINATIONS PLACED ON THE SECRETARY'S DESK IN THE FOREIGN SERVICE 

Foreign Service nominations beginning James E. Sarn, and ending John F. Cannon. which 

nominations were received by the Senate and appeared in the Congressional Record of July 25, 1983.
§ 1321.35 Notification of State plan or State plan amendment approval or disapproval for changes requiring Assistant Secretary for Aging approval. ( a ) The Assistant Secretary for Aging shall approve a State plan or State plan amendment by notifying the Governor or the Governor's designee in writing.
( b ) When the Assistant Secretary for Aging proposes to disapprove a State plan or amendment, the Assistant Secretary for Aging shall notify the Governor in writing, giving the reasons for the proposed disapproval, and inform the State agency that it may request a hearing on the proposed disapproval following the procedures described in guidance issued by the Assistant Secretary for Aging.
SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

ONE HUNDRED SECOND CONGRESS 

FIRST SESSION { 

SECOND SESSION { 

Convened January 3, 1991 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Thursday, April 25, 1991 

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF WALTER J. STEWART, 

SECRETARY OF THE SENATE 

By Gerald A. Hackett, Executive Clerk 
Calendar 

No. 

1 

Calendar 

No. 

1 

2 

3 

Ex. Res. 

No. 

104 

Treaty 

Doc. No. 

EX. B .. 

95-1 

EX. EE. 

96-1 

101-7 

1 

RESOLUTIONS 

Subject 

Resolution (executive) relating to the 

return to the President of certain treaty 

amendments. 

TREATIES 

Subject 

Two Related Protocols to the Convention for 

the Unification of Certain Rules Relating 

to International Carriage by Air, as 

Amended (Montreal Aviation Protocols No. 3 

and 4). 

International Convention on Standards of 

Training. Certification and Watchkeeping 

for Seafarers. with Annex, 1978. 

Annex III to the 1973 Convention for the 

Prevention of Pollution From Ships. 

Reported 

Bv 

Apr 18 91 Reported by Mr. 

Pell, Committee on Foreign 

Relations. 

Apr 23 91 Printed report 

filed (Exec. Rept. 102-3). 

Reported 

Bv 

Feb 5 91 Reported favorably 

by Mr. Pell, Committee on 

Foreign Relations, with a 

resolution of advice and 

consent to ratification 

with provisos. (Printed 

report--Ex. Rept 102-1 

together with minority 

views). 

Apr 23 91 Reported 

favorably by Mr. Pell, 

Committee on Foreign 

Relations, with a 

resolution of advice and 

consent to ratification. 

(Printed report--Ex. Rept 

102-4) 

Apr 23 91 Reported 

favorably by Mr. Pell, 

Committee on Foreign 

Relations, with a 

resolution of advice and 

consent to ratification. 

(Printed report--Ex. Rept 

102-5) 
2 

Calendar Treaty Subject - Reported 

No. Doc. No. Bv 

4 102-2 1988 Protocols Relating to the Safety of Apr 23 91 Reported 

Life at Sea and Load Line Conventions. favorably by Mr. Pell 

Committee on Foreign' 

Relations, with a 

resolution of advice and 

consent to ratification. 

(Printed report-Ex. Rept. 

102-6) 

-
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 129 (Friday, July 5, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 40426]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-16131]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS

Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Michigan Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (Commission), and 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), that a planning meeting of 
the Michigan Advisory Committee to the Commission will convene by 
conference call at 11:00 a.m. EST and adjourn at 1:00 p.m. EST on July 
24, 2013. The purpose of the meeting is to allow Committee members the 
opportunity to advise the Commission on various civil rights issues in 
Michigan. The meeting will include an orientation to new members 
followed by presentations and discussion of various civil rights 
issues.
    This meeting is available to the public through the following toll-
free call-in number: 888-438-5524, conference ID: 7822139. Any 
interested member of the public may call this number and listen to the 
meeting. Callers can expect to incur charges for calls they initiate 
over wireless lines, and the Commission will not refund any incurred 
charges. Callers will incur no charge for calls they initiate over 
land-line connections to the toll-free telephone number. Persons with 
hearing impairments may also follow the proceedings by first calling 
the Federal Relay Service at 1-800-977-8339 and providing the Service 
with the conference call number and conference ID number.
    Members of the public are entitled to submit written comments. The 
comments must be received in the regional office by August 7, 2013. The 
address is US Commission on Civil Rights, Midwestern Regional Office, 
55 W. Monroe St., Suite 410, Chicago, IL 60603. Comments may be emailed 
to callen@usccr.gov. Records generated by this meeting may be inspected 
and reproduced at the Midwestern Regional Office, as they become 
available, both before and after the meeting, and they will be uploaded 
onto the database at www.facadatabase.gov. Persons interested in the 
work of this advisory committee are advised to go to the Commission's 
Web site, www.usccr.gov, or to contact the Midwestern Regional Office 
at the above email or street address.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission and FACA.

    Dated in Chicago, IL: June 26, 2013.
David Mussatt,
Acting Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 2013-16131 Filed 7-3-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```