alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1356.68 Tribal title IV-E agency requirements for in-kind administrative and training contributions from third-party sources. ( a ) *Option to claim in-kind expenditures from third-party sources for non-Federal share of administrative and training costs.* A Tribal title IV-E agency may claim allowable in-kind expenditures from third-party sources for the purpose of determining the non-Federal share of administrative or training costs subject to paragraphs (b) through (d) of this section.
( b ) *In-kind expenditures for fiscal years 2010 and 2011* — ( 1 ) *Administrative costs.* A Tribal title IV-E agency may claim allowable in-kind expenditures from third-party sources of up to 25 percent of the total administrative funds expended during a fiscal quarter pursuant to section 474(a)(3)(C), (D) or (E) of the Act.
( 2 ) *Training costs.* A Tribal title IV-E agency may claim in-kind training expenditures of up to 12 percent of the total training funds expended during a fiscal year quarter pursuant to section 474(a)(3)(A) and (B) of the Act, but only from the following sources: ( i ) A State or local government;
( ii ) An Indian Tribe, Tribal organization, or Tribal consortium other than the Indian Tribe, organization, or consortium submitting the title IV-E plan;
( iii ) A public institution of higher education;
( iv ) A Tribal College or University (as defined in section 316 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1059c)); and
( v ) A private charitable organization.
( c ) *In-kind expenditures for fiscal years 2012 and thereafter* — ( 1 ) *Administrative costs.* A Tribal title IV-E agency may claim in-kind expenditures from third-party sources of up to 50 percent of the total administrative funds expended during a fiscal quarter pursuant to section 474(a)(3)(C), (D) or (E) of the Act.
( 2 ) *Training costs.* A Tribal title IV-E agency may claim in-kind training expenditures of up to 25 percent (or 30 percent consistent with section 203(b) of Pub. L. 110-351) of the total training funds expended during each quarter of fiscal year 2012 pursuant to section 474(a)(3)(A) and (B) of the Act. For fiscal year 2013 and thereafter, a Tribal title IV-E agency may claim in-kind training expenditures of up to 25 percent of the total training funds expended during a fiscal quarter pursuant to section 474(a)(3)(A) and (B) of the Act.
( 3 ) *Third-party sources.* A Tribal title IV-E agency may claim in-kind training expenditures for training funds from any allowable third-party source.
[77 FR 950, Jan. 6, 2012]
§ 72.16 Preliminary Action Program requirements. The following information must be submitted: ( a ) *Evidence of physical deficiencies.* A general description of the problems confronted by the local government in bringing its facilities up to an adequate level of quality, the basis for the determination that certain facilities are deficient, and the general level of deficient facilities found within the jurisdictions. Maps and other graphics should be used to indicate where the deficiencies are located, particularly in reference to the populations to be served.
( b ) *Level of resource support.* A summary of the public funds, including State and Federal, being spent by the jurisdiction on parks and recreation. A generalized description of the level of non-governmental support (neighborhood, voluntary and business) shall also be given.
( c ) *Adoption of goals.* The existing park and recreation goals adopted by the governing body of the jurisdiction are to be included. Emphasis should be placed on what the local government is seeking to achieve in its parks and recreation systems, including the population it is attempting to serve, the facilities and services offered, and the providers (public agency or private sector).
( d ) *Statement of priorities and implementation strategies.* Description of the priorities set by the local government as related to the deficiencies outlined above, and the strategies used to allocate available resources over time. Included should be a brief discussion of the relationship of the Preliminary Action Program to other related community development, historic preservation and urban revitalization efforts underway in the jurisdiction.
( e ) *Evidence of public participation.* A description of the means by which citizens and public officials will be included early in the decision process for project selection, the setting of priorities and schedules, and the development of implementation strategies. Existing public participation efforts within the jurisdiction should be used.
#### § 1160.2 Federal Council on the Arts and the Humanities

For the purposes of this part (45 CFR part 1160) the Federal Council on the Arts and the Humanities shall be composed of the Chairman of the National Endowment for the Arts, the Chairman of the National Endowment for the Humanities, the Secretary of Education, the Director of the National Science Foundation, the Librarian of Congress, the Chairman of the Commission of Fine Arts, the Archivist of the United States, the Commissioner, Public Buildings Service, General Services Administration, the Administrator of the General Services Administration, the Director of the United States Information Agency, the Secretary of the Interior, the Secretary of Commerce, the Secretary of Transportation, the Chairman of the National Museum Services Board, the Director of the Institute of Museum and Library Services, the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, the Secretary of Labor, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, and the Commissioner of the Administration on Aging.
#### § 1177.27 Mutual releases of the debtor and the Government.

In all appropriate instances, NEH will implement acceptable compromises by means of a mutual release, in which the debtor is released from further non-tax liability on the compromised debt in consideration of payment in full of the compromise amount and the Government and its officials, past and present, are released and discharged from any and all of the debtor's claims and causes of action arising from the same transaction. In the event NEH does not execute a mutual release when it compromises a debt, unless prohibited by law, the debtor is still deemed to have waived any and all claims and causes of action against the Government and its officials related to the transaction that gave rise to the compromised debt.
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-04-361-CR

RICKY SCOTT FIELDS	APPELLANT

	V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS	STATE

	------------

	FROM COUNTY CRIMINAL COURT NO. 9 OF TARRANT COUNTY

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	A jury convicted Appellant Ricky Scott Fields of the possession of less than two ounces of marijuana and assessed his punishment at 180 days’ confinement in the Tarrant County Jail and a $300 fine, suspending the confinement and placing him on community supervision for twenty-four months.  The trial court sentenced Appellant accordingly.

	In one point, Appellant contends that the evidence is factually insufficient to support the verdict.  Officer Paul Shackelford testified that he ran a random, routine license plate check on an older model blue Mazda 626.  He received a warrant hit on that registration.  The name associated with the warrant was that of Appellant.  Officer Shackelford stopped the vehicle.  Appellant was the driver.  There were no passengers.  Appellant did not have identification, so he told the officer his name and birthdate.  Officer Shackelford ran the information through the computer and received information about outstanding warrants.  He then confirmed through his dispatcher that the warrants were good.  After receiving confirmation, he waited on a backup officer to arrive.

	After the other officer arrived, Officer Shackelford had Appellant step out of the vehicle and arrested him.  Appellant had been in the car about fifteen to twenty minutes since the time of the stop.  Officer Shackelford then searched Appellant’s person, finding nothing.  When the officer searched the car, however, he discovered a small sealed, plastic, purple baggie containing a green, leafy substance that looked and smelled like marijuana.  The baggie was between the front seats on the passenger side of the console.  In response to Appellant’s question about whether the drugs were in plain view, Officer Shackelford replied, “Yes, depending upon where . . . a person was,” but he also said that the drugs were not visible from the driver’s side of the vehicle.  The officer did not find any other drugs or drug paraphernalia in the car.  There was no evidence that anyone else had ever driven or ridden in Appellant’s car.

	Based on the appropriate standard of review,2 we hold that the evidence is factually sufficient to support Appellant’s conviction.  We therefore overrule Appellant’s sole point and affirm the trial court’s judgment.

								PER CURIAM

PANEL F:	DAUPHINOT, WALKER, and MCCOY, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED:  August 25, 2005
EXHIBIT 32.1

                   CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of ISP Chemco Inc.
(the "Company") for the quarterly period ended April 3, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Sunil
Kumar, as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Salvatore J.
Guccione, as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his
knowledge and belief:

         (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


  /s/ Sunil Kumar
------------------------------
Name:   Sunil Kumar
Title:  President and Chief Executive Officer

Date:   May 17, 2005


  /s/ Salvatore J. Guccione
-----------------------------
Name:   Salvatore J. Guccione
Title:  Senior Vice President and
          Chief Financial Officer

Date:   May 17, 2005


     This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
P. 1 

# OAR Box 

# 1834 Prepped byKeeiaRichards



### Document

Number: 

# 29 ) IV-E-0 2 Docket Number: 

# A-90-0 7

Printed 11/10/20082:14:34

PM Sheet 29of 61

# n * v . P,2 

# KW>J UNITE D STATE S ENVIRONMENTA LPROTECTIO N AGENC Y AN N ARBOR . MICHIGA N 4810 5
OFFIC E O F AI R AN D RADIATIO N 

### JU N 

### 1 9 193

2 MEMORANDU

M
SUBJECT : Phon e Conversatio n Wit hRepresentativ e o f NRD C Regardin g

th e Fuel s an d Fue l Additive s Progra mNPR M e< ? arain < ? FROM : TO : THRU : Judit hGray , Projec t Manage r

Specia l Regulator yProject s B Docke t A-90-0 7 

### bpecia lRegulator yProject s Branc h' Thi s memorandu mi s t o document
- a+•«_ ! __Y-.K^-,A

### ~ . . o nJun e10 , 199 2 wit hM r n^f Hn• P

### conversatio nhel d

S^dTh^/aT i nft^aV^ ? rep r e 

### _L b 

### tatlv f 

### e U 

### s elS 

### '„ a 

### e n d 

### a^ _ whic hn ei s pr S " t 

### -^lT.f C 

### ^ ^ th S 

### «***- ! ~ s I nbroa doutline , th eNRD C proqra mpronoqa lt-r * K_ >^T-, +-K ~ • _. _~f^—"—*w

### *4

r ^waxuer g tn e_/ _ apparentl yconsider s th eF/F A s 

### D 2 ) !^i h ! alt heffect s ^dpoint s examine d i n Tie r 2 shoul d includ e immunolog ytesting . shoul d I f al l Tie r 3 decision s ar e lef t t o EPA' s discret-in n * « 

# csa^-asa r__a*js

rsrsi? Hi result s i , rtr%POS3lbX

### l outcome s base do nTie r 1 _2 

### 3 ? TT!V \3 re< 

### ^ lred



### - 2 ) Tie r 3 no t required , an d thi s plan req 

### ?_!! m e 

### ? t 

### % d e 

### P ? n do nEPA 

### ' * :-« . Unde r obviou s an dstraightforwar d1C hW6r eleS SP. 3

3 ) Examinatio n o f emissio n effect s shoul d no t necessaril yb e limite d t o inhalation , sinc e th e emission s ca n als o hav e effect s mediate d throug hwate r an d soil . 4 ) Th e tim e fram e fo r th e literatur e searc hshoul d no t b e limite d t o 1 5 years , sinc e positiv e tes t result s coul d hav e bee n obtaine d man yyear s ag o an d th e tes t neve r repeate d i n mor e recen t years . Durin g ou r conversation , I mentione d t o Mr . Driese n th e concern s voice d a t th e Ma y28t hpubli c hearin g abou t th e lac k o f availabl e commercia l la bfacilitie s an d th e associate d problem s i n meetin g th e statutor ythree-yea r tim e limi t fo r compliance . Mr . Driese n sai d tha t industr yalway s fin d som e reaso n wh yregulator y requirement s "can' t b e done" . I n thi s case , h e note d tha t th e la w w e ar e attemptin g t o implemen t ha s bee n o n th e book s fo r man yyear s an d ther e i s n o reaso n whyindustr yshoul d no t b e workin g righ t no w t o establis hth e facilitie s the ywil l nee d fo r timel ycompliance . I pointe d ou t that , eve n i f hi s vie wo n thi s poin t i s correc t fo r affecte d larg e businesse s an d thei r trad e organizations , smal l businesse s woul d generall yno t hav e th e resource s t o se t u p thei r ow n labs . Mr . Driese n ha d n o immediat e solutio n fo r smal l businesses , bu t als o emphasize d tha t businesse s o f al l size s ar e accountabl e fo r th e healt heffect s o f th e product s the ysell .
§ 1179.9 Refunds. ( a ) The National Endowment for the Humanities will refund promptly any amounts deducted to satisfy debts owed to the NEH when the debt is waived, found not owed to the NEH, or when directed by an administrative or judicial order.
( b ) The creditor agency will promptly return any amounts deducted by NEH to satisfy debts owed to the creditor agency when the debt is waived, found not owed, or when directed by an administrative or judicial order.
( c ) Unless required by law, refunds under this section shall not bear interest.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 23-0664

_________________

WALTER JOEY OVERSTREET,

 Plaintiff and Appellant,

 v.

ERIC FETTERHOFF, in his official

and individual capacities, JOHN DOES 3-7,

MONTANA HIGHWAY PATROL,

and PARK COUNTY, MONTANA,

a political subdivision, Bruce Becker,

individually, and as Park County Attorney,

Shannan Piccolo, individually, and as

Deputy Park County Attorney, STATE OF

MONTANA, and KENDRA LASSITER,

Individually, and in her official capacity as

Park County Attorney,

 Defendants and Appellees.

O R D E R

_________________

Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for 

submission on briefs to a five-justice panel of this Court. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record and to the 

Honorable Brenda R. Gilbert, District Judge.

For the Court,

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 11 2024

09/11/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0664
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the annual report of R&R Acquisition IX, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending June 30, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Arnold P. Kling, President
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
  and




(2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.





Dated:
September 23, 2010





/s/ Arnold P. KlingArnold
      P. KlingPresident(Principal
      Executive Officer)





A signed
original of this certification has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

No: 17-1179

Robert C. McChesney, in his official capacity as Treasurer of Bart McLeary for U.S. Senate, Inc. 

and Bart McLeay for U.S. Senate, Inc.

 Appellants

v.

Federal Election Commission and Caroline C. Hunter, in her official capacity as Chair of the 

Federal Election Commission

 Appellees

United States of America

______________________________________________________________________________

Appeal from U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska - Omaha

(8:16-cv-00168-LSC)

______________________________________________________________________________

MANDATE

In accordance with the opinion and judgment of 08/15/2018, and pursuant to the 

provisions of Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 41(a), the formal mandate is hereby issued in 

the above-styled matter. 

November 07, 2018

Clerk, U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit 

Appellate Case: 17-1179 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/07/2018 Entry ID: 4723716
NOTE : This order is nonprecedential. 

# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________ WEI WANG, Petitioner

v.

MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent

______________________
2024

- 1215

______________________ Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in No. DC

- 315H

- 20

- 0753

- I

- 1

.

______________________ O R D E R
The petitioner having failed to file the required Statement Concerning Discrimination, it is Case: 24-1215 Document: 14 Page: 1 Filed: 02/01/2024W ANG V

. MSPB 2

ORDERED that the pe tition for review be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in accordance with the rules.

FOR THE COURT

February 1, 2024 Date

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: February 1, 2024 Case: 24-1215 Document: 14 Page: 2 Filed: 02/01/2024
BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

In the Matter of 

Audit Division Recommendation 

Memorandum on the US Veterans 

Assistance Foundation, PAC 

) 

) A19-06 

) Agenda Document No. 22-16-A 

) 

) 

CERTIFICATION 

I, Vicktoria J. Allen, recording secretary of the Federal Election Commission open meeting 

on May 12, 2022 do hereby certify that the Commission took the following actions in the abovecaptioned matter: 

1. Failed by a vote of 3-3 to: 

Approve all the recommended findings in the Audit Division 

Recommendation Memorandum on the US Veterans Assistance 

Foundation, PAC (A19-06), as recommended in the Memorandum 

from the Chief Compliance Officer and the Audit Division dated 

March 23, 2022. 

Commissioners Broussard, Walther, and Weintraub voted affirmatively for the motion. 

Commissioners Cooksey, Dickerson, and Trainor dissented. 

2. Decided by a vote of 6-0 to: 

Approve Audit Division Recommendation Memorandum on the US 

Veterans Assistance Foundation, PAC (A19-06) as to Findings 1 

(Misstatement of Financial Activity), 2 (Increased Activity), 3 

(Disclosure of Occupation and Name of Employer), and 6 (Failure to 

File 24/48-Hour Reports), as recommended in the Memorandum from 

the Chief Compliance Officer and the Audit Division dated March 23, 

2022. 
 

 

Federal Election Commission Page 2 

Certification for Audit Division Recommendation Memorandum A19-06 

May 12, 2022 

Commissioners Broussard, Cooksey, Dickerson, Trainor, Walther, and Weintraub voted 

affirmatively for the decision. 

Attest: 

Digitally signed by Vicktoria J 

Allen Vicktoria J Allen Date: 2022.05.16 09:34:53 

May 16, 2022 -04'00'

Date Vicktoria J. Allen 

Acting Deputy Secretary of the 

Commission
This table was published on 4/3/15.

Candidate ID # Candidate State Amount

S8NY00082 SCHUMER, CHARLES E NY $1,000,000

S6NV00028 REID, HARRY NV $700,000

S8MT00010 BAUCUS, MAX MT $575,000

S6RI00163 REED, JACK F RI $550,000

S6OR00110 WYDEN, RONALD L OR $500,000

S0NY00410 GILLIBRAND, KIRSTEN ELIZABETH NY $350,000

S4MA00028 MARKEY, EDWARD JOHN MR MA $350,000

S2MA00170 WARREN, ELIZABETH MA $350,000

S6OH00163 BROWN, SHERROD OH $300,000

S6MN00267 KLOBUCHAR, AMY MN $300,000

S6MD00140 MIKULSKI, BARBARA MD $300,000

S8MI00281 STABENOW, DEBBIE MI $300,000

S8DE00079 CARPER, THOMAS R DE $275,000

S8WA00194 CANTWELL, MARIA WA $250,000

S0DE00092 COONS, CHRISTOPHER A DE $250,000

S4VT00017 LEAHY, PATRICK J VT $250,000

S2WA00189 MURRAY, PATTY WA $250,000

S4HI00136 SCHATZ, BRIAN HI $225,000

S6MD03177 CARDIN, BENJAMIN L MD $150,000

S2WI00219 BALDWIN, TAMMY WI $100,000

S6IL00151 DURBIN, RICHARD J IL $100,000

S8OR00207 MERKLEY, JEFFREY ALAN OR $100,000

S4NJ00185 BOOKER, CORY A NJ $85,000

S8MN00438 FRANKEN, AL MN $75,000

S2VA00142 KAINE, TIMOTHY MICHAEL VA $54,000

S2CA00286 BOXER, BARBARA CA $50,000

S2NM00088 HEINRICH, MARTIN TREVOR NM $50,000

S4CO00163 SALAZAR, KEN CO $50,000

S4VT00033 SANDERS, BERNARD VT $45,000

S6PA00217 CASEY, ROBERT P JR PA $40,000

S2IN00091 DONNELLY, JOSEPH S IN $40,000

S4MA00069 KERRY, JOHN F MA $39,250

S0CT00037 DODD, CHRISTOPHER J CT $25,000

S8NM00184 UDALL, TOM NM $25,000

S2NM00021 BINGAMAN, JEFF NM $15,310

S2ND00099 HEITKAMP, HEIDI ND $15,000

S6MO00305 MCCASKILL, CLAIRE MO $15,000

S6NJ00289 MENENDEZ, ROBERT NJ $15,000

Party Table 7

Campaign Committee Contributions to the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee

January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2014
#### § 1336.51 Project period.

The Notice of Financial Assistance Awarded will specify the period for which support is intended, although the Department makes funding commitments only for one budget period at a time. Financial assistance under section 803 of the Act may be ongoing, subject to policy decisions and funding limitations.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 118 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. J. RES. 118

    Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed foreign 
military sale to the Government of the United Arab Emirates of certain 
                     defense articles and services.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 21, 2024

  Mr. Van Hollen introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
     read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed foreign 
military sale to the Government of the United Arab Emirates of certain 
                     defense articles and services.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the following proposed 
foreign military sale to the Government of the United Arab Emirates is 
prohibited:
            (1) The sale of the following defense articles and 
        services, described in Transmittal No. 20-79, submitted to 
        Congress pursuant to section 36(b)(1) of the Arms Export 
        Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2776(b)(1)), and published in the 
        Congressional Record on November 20, 2024: two hundred fifty-
        nine (259) Guided Multiple Launch Rocket System (GMLRS) M31A1 
        Unitary Pods (1,554 missiles at six missiles per pod) and two 
        hundred three (203) Army Tactical Missile Systems (ATACMS) M57 
        Unitary Missiles. Also included are publications; personnel 
        training and training equipment; software development; U.S. 
        Government and contractor engineering, technical and logistics 
        support services; and other related elements of logistical and 
        program support.
                                 <all>
```