alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 156.935 Discovery. ( a ) The parties must identify any need for discovery from the opposing party as soon as possible, but no later than the time for the reply specified in § 156.937(c). Upon request of a party, the ALJ may stay proceedings for a reasonable period pending completion of discovery if the ALJ determines that a party would not be able to make the submissions required by § 156.937 without discovery. The parties should attempt to resolve any discovery issues informally before seeking an order from the ALJ.
( b ) Discovery devices may include requests for production of documents, requests for admission, interrogatories, depositions, and stipulations. The ALJ orders interrogatories or depositions only if these are the only means to develop the record adequately on an issue that the ALJ must resolve to decide the case.
( c ) Each discovery request must be responded to within 30 days of receipt, unless that period of time is extended for good cause by the ALJ.
( d ) A party to whom a discovery request is directed may object in writing for any of the following reasons: ( 1 ) Compliance with the request is unduly burdensome or expensive.
( 2 ) Compliance with the request will unduly delay the proceedings.
( 3 ) The request seeks information that is wholly outside of any matter in dispute.
( 4 ) The request seeks privileged information. Any party asserting a claim of privilege must sufficiently describe the information or document being withheld to show that the privilege applies. If an asserted privilege applies to only part of a document, a party withholding the entire document must state why the nonprivileged part is not segregable.
( 5 ) The disclosure of information responsive to the discovery request is prohibited by law.
( e ) Any motion to compel discovery must be filed within 10 days after receipt of objections to the party's discovery request, within 10 days after the time for response to the discovery request has elapsed if no response is received, or within 10 days after receipt of an incomplete response to the discovery request. The motion must be reasonably specific as to the information or document sought and must state its relevance to the issues in the case.
1 The Honorable James E. Gritzner, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 08-2933

___________ Quinton L. Jenkins, * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the v. * Southern District of Iowa. * Elizabeth Robinson, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: December 12, 2008 Filed: February 4, 2009

___________ Before BYE, MELLOY, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Iowa prisoner Quinton Jenkins filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint in which he claimed that he was repeatedly denied pa role without proper due process protections. The district court 1 dismissed the complaint prior to service of process, holding that Jenkins did not have a liberty interest in his parole. Following entry of judgment, Jenkins filed a motion for rec onsideration, which the district court denied. Within thirty days thereafter, Jenkins filed hi s notice of appeal (NOA). We affirm.-2- This appeal is not timely as to the order dismissing Jenkins’s complaint, because his NOA was not filed within thirty days after entry of judgment, and his motion for reconsideration was not filed with in ten days after entry of judgment so as to toll the time for filing an appeal. SeeFed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1 ) (30 days to appeal in civil case), 4(a)(4) (tolling effect of cer tain post-judgment motions), 4(c) (prison mailbox rule). Thus, we haveappellate jurisdiction only as to the order denying the motion for reconsideration, which we c onstrue as a motion brought under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b). Upon careful review, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in de nying the motion, because Jenkins did not demonstrate exceptional circumst ances warranting relief. SeeInt’l Bhd. of Elec. Workers v. Hope Elec. Corp. , 293 F.3d 409, 415 (8th Cir. 2002) (standard of review; appeals court does not review underlying or der, and relief will be granted under only most exceptional circumstances); Arnold v. Wood , 238 F.3d 992, 998 (8th Cir. 2001) (Rule 60(b) cannot substitute for an appeal); Broadway v. Norris , 193 F.3d 987, 990 (8th Cir. 1990) (Rule 60(b) is not vehicle for simple reargument on merits). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

_______________________________
§ 1168.300 Professional and technical services. ( a ) The prohibition on the use of appropriated funds, in § 1168.100 (a), does not apply in the case of any reasonable payment to a person, other than an officer or employee of a person requesting or receiving a covered Federal action, if the payment is for professional or technical services rendered directly in the preparation, submission, or negotiation of any bid, proposal, or application for that Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement or for meeting requirements imposed by or pursuant to law as a condition for receiving that Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement.
( b ) The reporting requirements in § 1168.110 (a) and (b) regarding filing a disclosure form by each person, if required, shall not apply with respect to professional or technical services rendered directly in the preparation, submission, or negotiation of any commitment providing for the United States to insure or guarantee a loan.
( c ) For purposes of paragraph (a) of this section, “professional and technical services” shall be limited to advice and analysis directly applying any professional or technical discipline. For example, drafting or a legal document accompanying a bid or proposal by a lawyer is allowable. Similarly, technical advice provided by an engineer on the performance or operational capability of a piece of equipment rendered directly in the negotiation of a contract is allowable. However, communications with the intent to influence made by a professional (such as a licensed lawyer) or a technical person (such as a licensed accountant) are not allowable under this section unless they provide advice and analysis directly applying their professional or technical expertise and unless the advice or analysis is rendered directly and solely in the preparation, submission or negotiation of a covered Federal action. Thus, for example, communications with the intent to influence made by a lawyer that do not provide legal advice or analysis directly and solely related to the legal aspects of his or her client's proposal, but generally advocate one proposal over another are not allowable under this section because the lawyer is not providing professional legal services. Similarly, communications with the intent to influence made by an engineer providing an engineering analysis prior to the preparation or submission of a bid or proposal are not allowable under this section since the engineer is providing technical services but not directly in the preparation, submission or negotiation of a covered Federal action.
( d ) Requirements imposed by or pursuant to law as a condition for receiving a covered Federal award include those required by law or regulation, or reasonably expected to be required by law or regulation, and any other requirements in the actual award documents.
( e ) Persons other than officers or employees of a person requesting or receiving a covered Federal action include consultants and trade associations.
( f ) Only those services expressly authorized by this section are allowable under this section.
#### § 222.70 Disposal of carcasses.

Carcasses of animals that have lost their status as wild free-roaming horses or burros may be disposed of in any customary manner acceptable under applicable State sanitary statutes including disposal through a rendering plant.
Exhibit
32.1
  
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Annual Report of Sound Worldwide Holdings, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending March 31, 2009 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I,  Roger
Kwok Wing Fan, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of
my knowledge and belief:
 
 1. The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
 
 2. The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.
    Date:
      July 14, 2008
                  /s/
      Roger Kwok Wing FanRoger
      Kwok Wing Fan
                    President,
      Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of
      Directors
§ 158.609 Determining the amount of penalty—aggravating circumstances. For every violation subject to a civil monetary penalty, if there are substantial or several aggravating circumstances, HHS may set the aggregate amount of the penalty at an amount sufficiently close to or at the maximum permitted by § 158.606 of this subpart to reflect that fact. HHS considers the following circumstances to be aggravating circumstances: ( a ) The frequency of violation indicates a pattern of widespread occurrence.
( b ) The violation(s) resulted in significant financial and other impacts on the average affected individual.
( c ) The entity does not provide documentation showing that substantially all of the violations were corrected.
§ 1149.51 How can I exclude a witness? Upon motion of any party, the ALJ must order witnesses excluded from the hearing room so that they cannot hear the testimony of other witnesses. This rule does not authorize exclusion of— ( a ) A party who is an individual;
( b ) In the case of a party that is not an individual, an officer or employee of the party appearing for the entity pro se or designated by the party's representative; or
( c ) An individual whose presence is shown by a party to be essential to the presentation of its case, including an individual employed by the Government engaged in assisting the representative for the Government.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 827 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 827

To provide that no Federal funds may be used to implement, administer, 
 or enforce the rule of the Department of Justice entitled ``Factoring 
      Criteria for Firearms with Attached `Stabilizing Braces'''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 15, 2023

  Mr. Kennedy (for himself and Mr. Marshall) introduced the following 
    bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the 
                               Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide that no Federal funds may be used to implement, administer, 
 or enforce the rule of the Department of Justice entitled ``Factoring 
      Criteria for Firearms with Attached `Stabilizing Braces'''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NO FEDERAL FUNDS FOR DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE RULE ON 
              STABILIZING BRACES.

    No Federal funds may be used to implement, administer, or enforce 
the rule of the Department of Justice entitled ``Factoring Criteria for 
Firearms with Attached `Stabilizing Braces'''.
                                 <all>
```
SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

ONE HUNDRED SECOND CONGRESS 

Convened January 3, 1991 

FIRST SESSION { Adjourned January 3, 1992 

Convened January 3, 1992 SECOND SESSION { 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Thursday, September 10, 1992 

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF WALTER J. STEWART, 

SECRETARY OF THE SENATE 

By Gerald A. Hackett. Executive Clerk 
1 

TREATIES 

calendar Treaty Subject Reported 

No. Doc. No. Bv 

1 EX. B., Two Related Protocols to the Convention for Feb S 91 Reported favorably 

95-1 the Unification of Certain Rules Relating by Mr. Pell, Committee on 

to International Carriage by Air, as Foreign Relations, with a 

Amended (Montreal Aviation Protocols No. 3 resolution of advice and 

and 4). consent to ratificatton 

with provisos. (Printed 

report-Ex. Rept. 102-1 

together with minority 

views). 
2 

NOMINATIONS 

Calendar MES&.ge Nominee, Office, And Predeces&>r Reported 

• 

• 

• 

No. No. Bv 

EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE 

PRESIDENT 

69S 1011 Wade F. Hom, of Maryland, to be Deputy Jul l, 92 Mr. Kennedy, 

Director for Demand Reduction, Office of Committee on Labor and 

National Drug Control Policy, vice Herbert Human Resources, without 

D. Kleber, resigned. printed report 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

741 1257 Hugo Pomrehn, of California. to be Under Aug s. 92 Mr. Johnston, 

Secretary of Energy, vice John Chatfield Committee on Energy and 

Tuck, resigned. Natural Resources, without 

printed report 

DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

785 sos Parker W. Borg. of Minnesota, a Career Aug 12, 92 Mr. Pell, 

Member of the Senior Foreign Service, Committee on Foreign 

Clim of Minister-COunselor. to be Relations, with printed 

Ambassador Extraordinary and report - Ex.Rept 102-S2. 

Plenipotentiary of the United States of 

America to the Union of Burma (Mvanmar). 

•Signifies nominee's commitment to respond to requests to appear and testify before any duly 

constituted committee of the Senate.
#### § 1182.1 Purpose and scope of these regulations.

The regulations in this part set forth the Institute's procedures under the Privacy Act, as required by 5 U.S.C. 552a(f), with respect to systems of records maintained by the Institute. These regulations establish procedures by which an individual may exercise the rights granted by the Privacy Act to determine whether an Institute system contains a record pertaining to him or her; to gain access to such records; and to request correction or amendment of such records. These regulations also set identification requirements, prescribe fees to be charged for copying records, and establish exemptions from certain requirements of the Act for certain Institute systems or components thereof:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
balance sheet and statements of operations found on pages 3 and 4 of the
Company's Form 10-QSB for the year to date, and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                             630
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   630
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   5,057
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,481
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        12,050
<OTHER-SE>                                     (10,474)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     5,057
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,258
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (3,258)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0

</TABLE>
#### § 158.344 Secretary's discretion to hold a hearing.

The Secretary may, at her discretion, conduct a public hearing with respect to a State's request for an adjustment to the MLR standard. All testimony and materials received in connection with any public hearing will be made part of the public record, and shall be considered by the Secretary in assessing a State's request for an adjustment to the MLR standard.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Army

# AGENCY:

Department of the Army, DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice of intent. 

# SUMMARY:

                        In compliance with 37 CFR 404*et seq.,*                         the Department of the Army hereby gives notice of its intent to grant to The National Center for Composite Systems Technology, a corporation having its principle place of business at 2000 Composite Drive, Kettering, OH 45420, an exclusive relative to U.S. Army Research Laboratory (ARL) patent US 6,881,374 entitled, “Apparatus for Induction Lamination of Electrically Conductive Fiber-Reinforced Thermoplastic”; April 19, 2005, Gerhard                         *et al.*

# DATES:

Anyone wishing to object to the grant of this license must file written objections along with supporting evidence, if any, not later than 15 days from the date of this notice.

# ADDRESSES:

Send written objections to Michael D. Rausa, U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Technology Applications, ATTN: AMSRD-ARL-DP-T/Bldg. 434, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21005-5425.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Michael D. Rausa, telephone (410) 278-5028.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

 None.

Brenda S. Bowen,

Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 06-932 Filed 1-31-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
MEMORANDUM 

DATE: January 24, 2015

TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR–2013-0602

FROM: Howard J. Hoffman, EPA - OGC

SUBJECT: January 14, 2015 Telephone Call with NextGen Climate Regarding Proposed 

Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants

On January 14, 2015, Howard J. Hoffman of EPA-OGC met by telephone with David Weiskopf 

of NextGen Climate to discuss NextGen Climate’s comments concerning the proposed Clean 

Power Plan for existing power plants.
<PAGE>

                            MINDARROW SYSTEMS, INC.
                           2000 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN

1.  The Plan.
    --------

1.1  Purpose.  The purpose of this Plan is to promote the success of the Company
     -------
     and the interests of its stockholders by attracting, motivating, retaining
     and rewarding certain officers, employees, directors and other eligible
     persons with awards and incentives for high levels of individual
     performance and improved financial performance of the Company. Capitalized
     terms used herein are defined in Section 5.

1.2  Administration and Authorization; Power and Procedure.
     -----------------------------------------------------

     1.2.1  Committee.  This Plan will be administered by and all Awards will be
            ---------
            authorized by the Committee. Action of the Committee with respect to
            its authority under this Plan shall be taken pursuant to a majority
            vote or by unanimous written consent of its members.

     1.2.2  Plan Awards; Interpretation; Powers of Committee.  Subject to the
            ------------------------------------------------
            express provisions of this Plan and any express limitations on the
            delegated authority of a Committee, the Committee will have the
            authority to:

            (a)  determine eligibility and the particular Eligible Persons who
                 will receive Awards;

            (b)  grant Awards to Eligible Persons, determine the price at which
                 securities will be offered or awarded and the amount of
                 securities to be offered or awarded to any of such persons, and
                 determine the other specific terms and conditions of Awards
                 consistent with the express limits of this Plan, establish the
                 installments (if any) in which such Awards will become
                 exercisable or will vest, and the respective consequences
                 thereof, or determine that no delayed exercisability or vesting
                 is required, and establish the events of termination or
                 reversion of such Awards;

            (c)  approve the forms of Award Agreements, which need not be
                 identical either as to type of Award or among Participants;

            (d)  construe and interpret this Plan and any Award or other
                 agreements defining the rights and obligations of the Company
                 and Participants under this Plan, further define the terms used
                 in this Plan, and prescribe, amend and rescind rules and
                 regulations relating to the administration of this Plan;

            (e)  cancel, modify, or waive the Corporation's rights with respect
                 to, or modify, discontinue, suspend, or terminate any or all
                 outstanding Awards held by Eligible Persons, subject to any
                 required consent under Section 4.5;

                                       1
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-50867

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

VERSUS

ELIZABETH CASTILLO DELEON,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

(SA-98-CR-54-ALL)

JUne 15, 1999

Before DAVIS, DUHÉ, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Court-appointed counsel for Elizabeth Castillo DeLeon has

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). DeLeon has filed a

response. Our independent review of the brief, the record, and

Deleon’s response discloses no non-frivolous issue in this direct

appeal. To the extent that her claims are based on ineffective
assistance of counsel, DeLeon can raise them in a § 2255 proceeding

pursuant to the waiver-of-appeal exception in her plea agreement.

Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel

is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS

DISMISSED.