alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CANDICE S. MILLER, MICHIGAN ROBERT A. BRADY, PENNSYLVANIA

CHAIRMAN Congress of the Gnited States RANKING MINORITY MEMBER

House of Representatives

COMMITTEE ON HOUSE ADMINISTRATION
1309 Longworth House Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20515-6157
(202) 225-8281
http://cha.house.gov

January 22, 2013

Ellen Weintraub, Chair
Federal Election Commission
999 E Street NW
Washington, DC 20463

Dear Chair Weintraub,

On November 3, 2011, the Committee on House Administration’s Subcommittee on Elections held an
oversight hearing where you and the other FEC commissioners appeared as witnesses. One of the
major topics at that hearing was the status of the FEC’s enforcement manual. At the request of the
Committee, FEC staff worked with Committee staff following the hearing and agreed on a process to
make most of that manual, and other previously-secret FEC documents, public. I commend the FEC
for this step toward transparency, which is a vital check on the government’s power in any
enforcement process and especially important for an agency whose enforcement actions can limit
criticism of the government and engagement in the political process.

In a May 23, 2012, press release announcing the release of the documents discussed at the hearing, the
FEC said, “The Office of General Counsel is currently preparing a revised Enforcement Manual, which
is scheduled to be completed and made available to the public early next year.” Given the age of the
existing enforcement manual, and the fact that you said at the hearing it “is not actually in its current
form being actively used,” updating the manual is an important next step in modernizing and
improving the FEC’s enforcement process.

Please respond to this letter no later than February 5, 2013, to provide the Committee with the current
status and expected completion date of the revised manual. If you have any questions about this letter,
please contact the Committee at 202-225-8281. Thank you for your attention to this important matter.

_Aincerely,
4 7

Lpdeck les

Candice S. Miller
Chairman

cc: Commissioner Don McGahn, Vice Chair
Commissioner Cynthia Bauerly
Commissioner Caroline Hunter
Commissioner Matthew Petersen
Commissioner Steven Walther
Anthony Herman, General Counsel
Exhibit 10.3


 


Loan
Agreement


 


Party
A (Borrower): Guangchengji (Shanghai) Industrial Co., Ltd.


Legal
representative: Pan Weicheng


Unified
Social Credit Code:


 


Party
B (Lender):


ID
No:


 


Based
on the principles of equality, voluntariness, honesty and credibility, both parties reached the following agreement through friendly
negotiation:


 


1.
Party B agrees to lend to Party A RMB _____ . The actual loan amount is the cash transferred.


 


2.
Purpose of the loan: For Party A's daily operations and expansion of business.


 


3.
Loan period: The loan period is 12 months, from July __, 2020 to July ___, 2021. If the loan is paid in installments, the date
of the last loan should be received no later than December 31, 2020.


 


4.
Loan interest: The loan interest is an annual interest rate of 8%, calculated based on the actual amount received. If the loan
is received in installments, the interest shall be calculated based on the actual date when Party B receives the loan. Interest
shall be paid quarterly. If party A cannot remit payment on time due to special circumstances both parties can agree another payment
time.


 


5.
Party B or a third party appointed by Party B should deposit the loan to the following bank appointed by Party A:


Account
name: Guangchengji (Shanghai) Industrial Co., Ltd.


Account
number:


Bank:
Bank of China Shanghai Pudong Avenue Sub-branch


 


6.
Representations and Warranties:


 


6.1
Party A must use the loan legally in accordance with the purposes specified in this agreement, and must not embezzle it for other
purposes, or use the loan for illegal activities.


 


6.2
the purpose of the loan is to for Party A's daily operations and expansion of business.


 


7.
Settlement of Contract disputes


 


7.1
Disputes arising during the implementation of this Agreement shall be settled through friendly negotiation between the parties,
or mediated by the arbitration institution appointed by both parties. If negotiation or mediation fails, a lawsuit may be filed
in the people's court where Party A is located or Beijing Peoples’ Court or Hong Kong District court.


 


8.
This agreement will become effective after being signed or stamped by both parties. This contract has two copies, with each party
holding one copy. The text of the contract has the same legal effect.


 


Party
A (Lender): Guangchengji (Shanghai) Industrial Co., Ltd.


Seal
of Guangchengji (Shanghai) Industrial Co., Ltd.


Date
of signing: July __, 2020


 


Party
B (Borrower):


Date
of signing: July __, 2020
#### § 148.120 Guaranteed availability of individual health insurance coverage to certain individuals with prior group coverage.

The rules for guaranteeing the availability of individual health insurance coverage to certain eligible individuals with prior group coverage have been superseded by the requirements of § 147.104 of this subchapter, which set forth Federal requirements for guaranteed availability of coverage in the group and individual markets.

[79 FR 30340, May 27, 2014]
PS3-114 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPE ALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

C.A. No. 21-1076

ROBERT CASON, Appellant

VS.

RHUEL A. JOHNSTON

(W.D. Pa. Civ. No. 2:20-cv-04695)

___________________ _____________ORDER

________________ _________________

The Clerk of Court is directed to file the amended opinion provided herewith.

Because the amended opinion re vises only footnote #4 and does not affect the disposition

of the case, the judgme nt remains unchanged.

By the Court,

s/ Paul B. Matey Circuit Judge

Dated: May 11, 2021 SLC/cc: Robert Cason
Exhibit32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the QuarterlyReport of Salomon Smith Barney Global Diversified Futures Fund L.P.(the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for theperiod ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the "Report"),I, David J. Vogel, President and Director of Citigroup Managed FuturesLLC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Partnership.

/s/ David J.Vogel

|  |
|--|
|  |  |
|  |

David J.VogelCitigroup Managed Futures LLC President and Director

May 16, 2005

----
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 750 

To amend title III of the Public Health Service Act to prohibit health 

centers from providing abortions, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 9, 2023 

Mr. BRAUN (for himself, Mr. RUBIO, and Mr. SCOTT of Florida) introduced 

the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 

on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To amend title III of the Public Health Service Act to 

prohibit health centers from providing abortions, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No Taxpayer Funding 

5 for Health Centers Providing Abortion Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON ABORTIONS. 

7 Section 330(a)(2) of the Public Health Service Act 

8 (42 U.S.C. 254b(a)(2)) is amended— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 750 IS

1 (1) in the paragraph heading, by striking ‘‘LIM2 ITATION’’ and inserting ‘‘LIMITATIONS’’; 

3 (2) by striking ‘‘The requirement’’ and insert4 ing the following: 

5 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The requirement’’; 

6 and 

7 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

8 ‘‘(B) LIMITATION ON ABORTIONS.— 

9 ‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—Funds made avail10 able to health centers under this section 

11 may not be used for abortions except 

12 where necessary to save the life of the 

13 mother. No health center or related treat14 ment facility, that receives funds under 

15 this section, may provide or be used to pro16 vide an abortion except where necessary to 

17 save the life of the mother. 

18 ‘‘(ii) DEFINITION.—In this subpara19 graph, the term ‘abortion’ means the use 

20 or prescription of any instrument, medi21 cine, drug, or any other substance or de22 vice— 

23 ‘‘(I) to intentionally kill the un24 born child of a woman known to be 

25 pregnant; or 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 750 IS

1 ‘‘(II) to intentionally terminate 

2 the pregnancy of a woman known to 

3 be pregnant, with an intention other 

4 than— 

5 ‘‘(aa) after viability to 

6 produce a live birth and preserve 

7 the life and health of the child 

8 born alive; or 

9 ‘‘(bb) to remove a dead un10 born child.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, I, Robert Boeckman, Chief Operations
Officer and Co-Chief Executive Officer of Breda Telephone Corp., certify that to
my knowledge (i) Breda Telephone Corp.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the
quarter ended June 30, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Breda Telephone Corp.

Date: August 13, 2004.


                                        /s/ Robert Boeckman
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Robert Boeckman, Chief Operations
                                        Officer and Co-Chief Executive Officer


                                      E-18
#### Catharine J. Brown, Individually and as Executrix of Ira Brown, Deceased, Appellant, *v.*The New York Cab Company, Limited, Defendant, and Sara G. Bronson et al., as Executors of Frederic Bronson, Deceased, Respondents.

(Argued May 7, 1907;

decided May *21,*1907.)

*Brown*v. *Bronson,*114 App. Div. 911, affirmed.

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered July 20, 1906, affirming a judgment in favor of defendants entered *634upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court on trial at Special Term in an action to recover a certificate of stock pledged, as collateral security for the payment of a promissory note.

*John A. Straley*for appellant.

*Flamen B. Candler*and *William Jay*for respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with costs;'no opinion.

Concur: Geay, O’Beien, Yann, Webnee, Willaed Babtlett and Chase, JJ. Absent: Cullen, Ch. J.
§ 155.1010 Certification process for QHPs. ( a ) *Certification procedures.* The Exchange must establish procedures for the certification of QHPs consistent with § 155.1000(c). ( 1 ) *Completion date.* The Exchange must complete the certification of the QHPs that will be offered during the open enrollment period prior to the beginning of such period, as outlined in § 155.410.
( 2 ) *Ongoing compliance.* The Exchange must monitor the QHP issuers for demonstration of ongoing compliance with the certification requirements in § 155.1000(c).
( b ) *Exchange recognition of plans deemed certified for participation in an Exchange.* Notwithstanding paragraph (a) of this section, an Exchange must recognize as certified QHPs: ( 1 ) A multi-State plan certified by and under contract with the U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
( 2 ) A CO-OP QHP as described in subpart F of part 156 and deemed as certified under § 156.520(e).
§ 150.405 Filing of request for hearing. ( a ) A respondent has a right to a hearing before an ALJ if it files a request for hearing that complies with § 150.407(a), within 30 days after the date of issuance of either CMS's notice of proposed assessment under § 150.343 or notice that an alternative dispute resolution process has terminated. The request for hearing should be addressed as instructed in the notice of proposed determination. “Date of issuance” is five (5) days after the filing date, unless there is a showing that the document was received earlier.
( b ) The ALJ may extend the time for filing a request for hearing only if the ALJ finds that the respondent was prevented by events or circumstances beyond its control from filing its request within the time specified above. Any request for an extension of time must be made promptly by written motion.
§ 156.602 Other coverage that qualifies as minimum essential coverage. The following types of coverage are designated by the Secretary as minimum essential coverage for purposes of section 5000A(f)(1)(E) of the Code: ( a ) *Self-funded student health coverage.* Coverage offered to students by an institution of higher education (as defined in the Higher Education Act of 1965), where the institution assumes the risk for payment of claims, are designated as minimum essential coverage for plan or policy years beginning on or before December 31, 2014. For coverage beginning after December 31, 2014, sponsors of self-funded student health coverage may apply to be recognized as minimum essential coverage pursuant to the process provided under 45 CFR 156.604.
( b ) *Refugee Medical Assistance supported by the Administration for Children and Families.* Coverage under Refugee Medical Assistance, authorized under section 412(e)(7)(A) of The Immigration and Nationality Act, provides up to eight months of coverage to certain noncitizens who are considered Refugees, as defined in section 101(a)(42) of the Act.
( c ) *Medicare advantage plans.* Coverage under the Medicare program pursuant to Part C of title XVIII of the Social Security Act, which provides Medicare Parts A and B benefits through a private insurer.
( d ) *State high risk pool coverage.* A qualified high risk pool as defined by section 2744(c)(2) of the Public Health Service Act established on or before November 26, 2014 in any State.
( e ) *Other coverage.* Other coverage that qualifies pursuant to § 156.604.
[78 FR 39529, July 1, 2013, as amended at 80 FR 10875, Feb. 27, 2015]
DTIC-D

MEMORANDUM FOR ALL DEFENSE TECHNICAL INFORMATION CENTER

 EMPLOYEES

SUBJECT: Policy Statement on Reasonable Accommodations for Individuals with Disabilities 

The Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC) is committed to ensuring all qualified 

employees and applicants with disabilities are afforded benefits and privileges of employment 

equal to employees and applicants without disabilities. It is DTIC’s policy to provide reasonable 

accommodations in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act as amended, the 

Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and all relevant federal laws and regulations. 

A reasonable accommodation is assistance or changes in the work environment that would 

enable one to perform the duties of his/her job despite having a disability. Reasonable 

accommodation examples include modifications or adjustments that enable an individual to apply 

for a job, perform a job, or have equal access to the workplace and employee benefits. 

An employee or applicant must request a reasonable accommodation orally or in writing. 

An employee should make the request with his/her immediate supervisor, any management official 

within the appropriate chain of command, or the servicing Disability Program Coordinator. 

Applicants can request a reasonable accommodation through the point of contact identified on the 

Job Opportunity Announcement. The supervisor and employee must engage in the interactive 

process to ensure processing of the request within the established 45 day timeframe, unless 

extenuating circumstances are present. 

Any DTIC employee or applicant for employment who believes that he/she was unlawfully 

denied a reasonable accommodation, may file a discrimination complaint through the DLA EEO 

office within 45 calendar days of the denial. More detailed guidance about the reasonable 

accommodation process can be found at DLA Instruction 1440.1, located at 

http://www.dla.mil/EEO/Business/Policies.aspx, and by consulting the servicing EEO office at 

(571) 767-6777. 

DTIC is committed to providing reasonable accommodations to qualified employees with 

disabilities – to transform disabilities into enabling abilities and improve DTIC productivity and 

employee cohesiveness.

Christopher E. Thomas

Administrator
§ 1160.10 Loss adjustment. ( a ) In the event of loss or damage covered by an Indemnity Agreement, the indemnitee without delay shall file a Notice of Loss or Damage with the Council and shall exercise reasonable care in order to minimize the amount of loss. Within a reasonable time after a loss has been sustained, the claimant shall file a Proof of Loss or Damage on forms provided by the Council. Failure to report such loss or damage and to file such Proof of Loss within sixty (60) days after the termination date as defined in § 1160.3(k) shall invalidate any claim under the Indemnity Agreement.
( b ) In the event of total loss or destruction of an indemnified item, indemnification will be made on the basis of the amount specified in the Indemnity Agreement.
( c ) In the event of partial loss, or damage, and reduction in the fair market value, as a result thereof, to an indemnified item, indemnification will be made on the basis provided for in the Indemnity Agreement.
( d ) No loss or damage claim will be paid in excess of the Indemnification Limits specified in § 1160.11.
[56 FR 49848, Oct. 2, 1991. Redesignated at 60 FR 42465, Aug. 16, 1995, and further redesignated at 73 FR 21056, Apr. 18, 2008]
### Executiv e Orde r 1286 6 an d Congressiona l Revie w Requirement s Rulemakin g Documen t

Title : Vtof^l^^c ^ fy

r hat^jh^Mf^a

^ idfuLt . (//'^ff^/^^ M M^^ ^ M'f^^ ^

Withrespec t

t o th e attache drulemakin g document(s) : 1 . E.0.12866 : Th e requirement s o f sectio n6(a)(3)(E ) o f

E.O . 1286 6 hav e bee nme t inaccordanc e withth e followin g [initia l appropriat e line] :

Th e rulemakin g document(s ) wa s no t reviewe db y th e Offic e o f Informatio n an d Regulator y Affair s (OIRA) . N o substantiv e change s wer e mad e t o th e document(& ) afte r i t wa s submitte dt o OIRA . Th e require dinformatio ni s attached . 2 . Congressiona l Review : Th e requirement s o f th e Smal l Busines s Regulator y Enforcemen t Fairnes s Ac t for th e submissio n o f

fmal rule s t o Congres s an dGA O ( § 801 ) hav e bee nme t inaccordanc e withth e followin g [initia l appropriat e line] :

^^^ ^ Thi s documen t

i s no t afma l rule . Thi s documen t

i s no t arul e unde r

( § 804) . Th e documen t

ha s bee nsubmitte dt o C-5 0 for transmissio nt o Congres s an dGAO . Signatur e 

# L. t 

# H u Name 

### //f^^^l / \nuc-h^ \OM'f£ , o r

^-u^i^jiLUif/rhy-ZLj.. . Title/Offic e Dat e
#### Isaac P. Smith, as Executor of and Trustee under the Will of Charles G. Havens, Deceased, Respondent, *v.*Havens Relief Fund Society et al., Respondents, and Harriet A. Parmly et al., Appellants.

*Smith*v. *Ravens Belief Fund*Society, 118 App. Div. 678, affirmed.

(Argued December 17, 1907;

decided January 7, 1908.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered April 22, 1907, which affirmed an interlocutory and final judgment of Special Term in an action for the construction of the will of Charles G. Havens, deceased.

*Alfred G. Reeves*and *Isaac 8. Signor*for appellants.

*George ]\I- Bayne*and *Arthur M. Silber*for plaintiff, respondent. •

*Riohard L. Hand, Charles M. Bleeclter*and *Leonard S. Wheeler*for Havens Relief Fund Society et al., defendants, respondents.

*558
      *Harry E. Newell*for Charlotte A. W. Costello, defendant, respondent.

*Frank W. Stevens*for Charles C. H. Stevens et ah, defendants, respondents.

*Augustus N Hand*for Townsend Jones, as executor, defendant, respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Hisoook, JJ.
§ 152.22 Access to services. ( a ) *General rule.* A PCIP may specify the networks of providers from whom enrollees may obtain plan services. The PCIP must demonstrate to HHS that it has a sufficient number and range of providers to ensure that all covered services are reasonably available and accessible to its enrollees.
( b ) *Emergency services.* In the case of emergency services, such services must be covered out of network if: ( 1 ) The enrollee had a reasonable concern that failure to obtain immediate treatment could present a serious risk to his or her life or health; and
( 2 ) The services were required to assess whether a condition requiring immediate treatment exists, or to provide such immediate treatment where warranted.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsAn intercomparison of intraseasonal variability in general circulation models and observationsLow frequency oscillations appearing in three GCM seasonal cycle integrations are compared with the analyses of the European Center for Medium Range Weather Forecasting (ECMWF). All three models have the same resolution: 4 deg latitude by 5 deg longitude, with 9 levels. The dominant phase speeds and the differential vertical structure of the heating profiles in the GCMs are in general agreement with current theory involving the positive feedback between latent heating and moist static stability. All three GCMs fail to capture the detailed evolution in the different stages of the development and decay of the oscillation. The results suggest that an improvement in the boundary layer moisture processes may be crucial for a better simulation of the oscillation.Document ID19900017912Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsPark, Chung-Kyu*(Centel Federal Services Corp. Reston, VA., United States)*Straus, David M.*(Maryland Univ. College Park., United States)*Lau, Ka-Ming*(NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, MD., United States)*Schubert, Siegfried D.*(NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, MD, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateAugust 1, 1990Subject CategoryMeteorology And ClimatologyReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-100764REPT-90E02836NAS 1.15:100764Accession Number90N27228Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900017912.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024