alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 158.330 Criteria for assessing request for adjustment to the medical loss ratio. The Secretary may consider the following criteria in assessing whether an adjustment to the 80 percent MLR standard, as calculated in accordance with this subpart, would be reasonably likely to help stabilize the individual market in a State that has requested such adjustment: ( a ) The number and financial performance (based on data provided by a State under § 158.321) of issuers actively offering individual health insurance coverage on- and off-Exchange, grandfathered health plans as defined in § 147.140 of this subchapter, coverage that meets the criteria for transitional policies outlined in applicable guidance, and non-grandfathered single risk pool coverage; the number of issuers reasonably likely to cease or begin offering individual market coverage in the State; and the likelihood that an adjustment to the 80 percent MLR standard could help increase competition in the individual market in the State, including in underserved areas.
( b ) Whether an adjustment to the 80 percent MLR standard for the individual market may improve consumers' access to agents and brokers.
( c ) The capacity of any new issuers or issuers remaining in the individual market to write additional business in the event one or more issuers were to cease offering individual market coverage on the Exchange, in certain geographic areas, or in the entire individual market in the State.
( d ) The impact on premiums charged, and on benefits and cost sharing provided, to consumers by issuers remaining in or entering the individual market in the event one or more issuers were to cease or begin offering individual market coverage on the Exchange, in certain geographic areas, or in the entire individual market in the State.
( e ) Any other relevant information submitted by the State's insurance commissioner, superintendent, or comparable official in the State's request.
[83 FR 17071, Apr. 17, 2018]
###### Editorial Note on Part 1303

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1303 appear at 89 FR 67816, Aug. 21, 2024.

#### § 1303.32 Evaluations and corrective actions for delegate agencies.

A grant recipient must evaluate and ensure corrective action for delegate agencies according to section 641A(d) of the Act.
Order entered November 3, 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas** No. 05 - 14 - 00531 - CV JUAN CARLOS FLORES, Appellant V. CHASCO, INC. A/K/A C HASCO INTERIORS, INC ., ET AL., Appellee s On Appeal from the 160th Judicial District Co urt Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC - 09 - 14912 - H 

### O RDER W e GRANT appellant’s October 22, 2014 motion for second extension of time to file appellant’s brief and ORDER the brief be filed no later than November 18, 2014

. No further extensions wi ll be granted absent exigent circumstances.

/s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE
§ 150.221 Transition to State enforcement. ( a ) If CMS determines that a State for which it has assumed enforcement authority has enacted and implemented legislation to enforce PHS Act requirements and also determines that it is appropriate to return enforcement authority to the State, CMS will enter into discussions with State officials to ensure that a transition is effected with respect to the following: ( 1 ) Consumer complaints and inquiries.
( 2 ) Instructions to issuers.
( 3 ) Any other pertinent aspect of operations.
( b ) CMS may also negotiate a process to ensure that, to the extent practicable, and as permitted by law, its records documenting issuer compliance and other relevant areas of CMS's enforcement operations are made available for incorporation into the records of the State regulatory authority that will assume enforcement responsibility.
[64 FR 45795, Aug. 20, 1999, as amended at 78 FR 13440, Feb. 27, 2013]
# EUR-Lex - 12003TN08/03 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12003TN08/03

**Act concerning the conditions of accession of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia and the Slovak Republic and the adjustments to the Treaties on which the European Union is founded - Annex VIII: List referred to in Article 24 of the Act of Accession: Latvia - 3. Free movement of capital **

*
Official Journal L 236 , 23/09/2003 P. 0826 - 0826 *

3. FREE MOVEMENT OF CAPITAL

Treaty on European Union;

Treaty establishing the European Community.

Notwithstanding the obligations under the Treaties on which the European Union is founded, Latvia may maintain in force for seven years from the date of accession the rules laid down in its legislation existing at the time of signature of this Act regarding the acquisition of agricultural land and forests by nationals of the Member States and by companies formed in accordance with the laws of another Member State and being neither established nor registered nor having a local branch or agency in Latvia. In no instance may a national of a Member State be treated less favourably in respect of the acquisition of agricultural land and forests than at the date of signature of the Accession Treaty or be treated in a more restrictive way than a national of a third country.

Nationals of another Member State who wish to establish themselves as self-employed farmers and reside in Latvia, and who have been legally resident and active in farming in Latvia for at least three years continuously, shall not be subject to the provisions of the preceding paragraph or to any procedures other than those to which nationals of Latvia are subject.

A general review of these transitional measures shall be held in the third year following the date of accession. To this effect, the Commission shall submit a report to the Council. The Council may, acting unanimously on a proposal from the Commission, decide to shorten or terminate the transitional period indicated in the first paragraph.

If there is sufficient evidence that, upon expiry of the transitional period, there will be serious disturbances or a threat of serious disturbances on the agricultural land market of Latvia, the Commission, at the request of Latvia, shall decide upon the extension of the transitional period for up to a maximum of three years.

--------------------------------------------------
#### § 171.200 Availability and effect of exceptions.

A practice shall not be treated as information blocking if the actor satisfies an exception to the information blocking provision as set forth in this subpart B by meeting all applicable requirements and conditions of the exception at all relevant times.
§ 1626.5 Aliens eligible for assistance based on immigration status. Subject to all other eligibility requirements and restrictions of the LSC Act and regulations and other applicable law, a recipient may provide legal assistance to an alien who is present in the United States and who is within one of the following categories: ( a ) An alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence as an immigrant as defined by section 101(a)(20) of the INA (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(20));
( b ) An alien who is either married to a United States citizen or is a parent or an unmarried child under the age of 21 of such a citizen and who has filed an application for adjustment of status to permanent resident under the INA, and such application has not been rejected;
( c ) An alien who is lawfully present in the United States pursuant to an admission under section 207 of the INA (8 U.S.C. 1157) (relating to refugee admissions) or who has been granted asylum by the Attorney General or the Secretary of DHS under section 208 of the INA (8 U.S.C. 1158);
( d ) An alien who is lawfully present in the United States as a result of being granted conditional entry pursuant to section 203(a)(7) of the INA (8 U.S.C. 1153(a)(7), as in effect on March 31, 1980) before April 1, 1980, because of persecution or fear of persecution on account of race, religion, or political opinion or because of being uprooted by catastrophic natural calamity;
( e ) An alien who is lawfully present in the United States as a result of the Attorney General's withholding of deportation or exclusion under section 243(h) of the INA (8 U.S.C. 1253(h), as in effect on April 16, 1996) or withholding of removal pursuant to section 241(b)(3) of the INA (8 U.S.C. 1231(b)(3)); or
( f ) An alien who meets the requirements of § 1626.10 or § 1626.11.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 34 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 34

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
 authorizing the Congress to prohibit the physical desecration of the 
                       flag of the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 14, 2023

  Mr. Daines (for himself, Mr. Cramer, and Mr. Crapo) introduced the 
 following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
 authorizing the Congress to prohibit the physical desecration of the 
                       flag of the United States.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within 7 years after the date of its submission by the Congress:

                              ``Article--

    ``The Congress shall have power to prohibit the physical 
desecration of the flag of the United States.''.
                                 <all>
```
No. 5560.

#### Tom Williams *v.*The State.

Theft.—Indictment, to properly charge theft of property belonging to more than one owner, must negative the consent of either to the taking.

Appeal from the District Court of Lamar. Tried below before the Hon. D. H. Scott.

The opinion states the case. The penalty assessed by the verdict was a term of ten years in the penitentiary.

*620Opinion delivered June 15, 1887.

Ho brief for the appellant.

*W. L. Davidson,*Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Hurt, Judge.

This is a conviction for theft of a pistol. The property and possession are alleged in Hicks & Bettis, and the property is alleged to have been taken without their consent; and in another part of the indictment it is alleged to have been taken without the consent of said *Hicks and Bettis.*

The indictment is fatally defective, because not alleging that the property was taken without the consent of *either.*(See this question discussed and decided in Taylor v. The State, 18 Texas Ct. App., 489. Also see McIntosh v. The State, Id., 284.) The ' judgment is reversed and the prosecution is dismissed.

*Reversed and dismissed.*
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 55 (Thursday, March 21, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 17395]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-06549]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9793-1; EPA-HQ-OA-2013-0124]

Good Neighbor Environmental Board; Notification of Public 
Advisory Committee Teleconference

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notification of Public Advisory Committee Teleconference.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 92-
463, notice is hereby given that the Good Neighbor Environmental Board 
(GNEB) will hold a public teleconference on April 2, 2013 from 12 p.m. 
to 4 p.m. Eastern Standard Time. Due to budgetary uncertainties, EPA is 
announcing this teleconference with less than 15 calendar days public 
notice. The meeting is open to the public. For further information 
regarding the teleconference and background materials, please contact 
Mark Joyce at the number listed below.
    Background: GNEB is a federal advisory committee chartered under 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act, PL 92463. GNEB provides advice and 
recommendations to the President and Congress on environmental and 
infrastructure issues along the U.S. border with Mexico.
    Purpose of Meeting: The purpose of this teleconference is to 
discuss the Good Neighbor Environmental Board's Sixteenth Report. The 
report will focus on environmental infrastructure issues in the U.S.-
Mexico border region.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: If you wish to make oral comments or submit 
written comments to the Board, please contact Mark Joyce at least five 
days prior to the meeting. Written comments may also be submitted at 
http://www.regulations.gov.
    General Information: The agenda and meeting materials will be 
available at http://www.regulations.gov under Docket ID: EPA-HQ-OA-
2013-0124. General information about GNEB can be found on its Web site 
at www.epa.gov/ofacmo/gneb.
    Meeting Access: For information on access or services for 
individuals with disabilities, please contact Mark Joyce at (202) 564-
2130 or email at joyce.mark@epa.gov. To request accommodation of a 
disability, please contact Mark Joyce at least 10 days prior to the 
meeting to give EPA as much time as possible to process your request.

    Dated: March 14, 2013.
Mark Joyce,
Acting Designated Federal Officer.
[FR Doc. 2013-06549 Filed 3-20-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
Audit ~f / ISFEDERAL ELECTION COM/\\ISSION

1\25 .... SIIU II :--tW.

WN;HI~CTO~.l)l. 21l4hl

ADDITIONAL INroRMATION REGARDING 'lHlS ORGANIZATION

MAY BE IDCATED IN A CDMPLETED OOMPLIANCE ACrIOO

FlLE RELEASED BY 'mE CXM1ISSION AND MADE PUBLIC IN

'!HE PUBLIC REOORDS OFFICE. roR 'lKIS PARTICULAR

ORGANIZATION'S <XM'LETED <.n1PLIANCE ACITON FILE

SD1PLY lSI.. FUR mE PRESS stH-1ARY OF MJR 41 5J'(

'!HE PRESS StM1ARY WIIL PROVIDE A BRIEF HIS'IDRY OF

'!HE CASE AND A SUM1ARY OF mE ACITONS TAKEN, IF Pm.

c.

,....

c

_.

e

•
IIA 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 11 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United 

States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection 

Agency relating to ‘‘Control of Air Pollution From New Motor Vehicles: 

Heavy-Duty Engine and Vehicle Standards’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 9, 2023 

Mrs. FISCHER (for herself, Mr. MARSHALL, Ms. ERNST, Mr. RISCH, Mr. BARRASSO, Mr. CRAPO, Ms. LUMMIS, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mr. BUDD, Mr. 

MORAN, Mr. THUNE, Mr. WICKER, Mr. TILLIS, Mr. SCHMITT, Mr. 

ROUNDS, Mr. BRAUN, Mr. SCOTT of Florida, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. SULLIVAN, Mr. YOUNG, Mrs. HYDE-SMITH, Mr. CRAMER, Mrs. BRITT, Mr. 

LANKFORD, Mr. HOEVEN, Mr. COTTON, Mr. DAINES, Mrs. BLACKBURN, 

Mr. MULLIN, Mr. PAUL, Mr. CRUZ, Mr. RUBIO, Mr. LEE, and Mr. 

HAWLEY) introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice 

and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by 

the Environmental Protection Agency relating to ‘‘Control of Air Pollution From New Motor Vehicles: HeavyDuty Engine and Vehicle Standards’’. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the Ad4 ministrator of the Environmental Protection Agency relatVerDate Sep 11 2014 02:49 Feb 10, 2023 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\SJ11.IS SJ11

DMWilson on DSKJM0X7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•SJ 11 IS 

1 ing to ‘‘Control of Air Pollution From New Motor Vehi2 cles: Heavy-Duty Engine and Vehicle Standards’’ (88 Fed. 

3 Reg. 4296 (January 24, 2023)), and such rule shall have 

4 no force or effect. 

Æ 


DMWilson on DSKJM0X7X2PROD with BILLS
#### Matney, et al. v. Edmonds.

(Decided March 15, 1918.)

Appeal from Pike Circuit Court.

1." Appeal and Error — Statement.—An appeal is prosecuted by making the statement required by section 739 of the Code of Practice and paying, the tax thereon.

2. Appeal and Error — Parties—Appellee.—Where several parties who have recovered separate judgments are jointly named as appellees in one statement of appeal and one tax is paid, there is *837only one appeal; and, the party first named as an appellee is the only appellee.

WHEELER & WHEELER for appellants.

J. J. MOORE for appellee.

Response to Petition eor Rehearing by

Judge Miller —

Overruling petition.

The opinion properly held, under the authorities there cited, that the Ironton Lumber Company was not a party to this appeal. 179 Ky. 243. In their petition for a rehearing appellants ask that they be permitted to supply the record by filing a statement of appeal in which the Ironton Lumber Company is named as appellee ; or, if that cannot be done, that the statement of appeal be supplied by reference to a commissioner.

In his affidavit in support of the motion appellants’ counsel states that he filed a statement (a copy of which is now tendered), at the time the record was filed in the office of the clerk of this court, in which the Ironton Lumber Company was named as an appellee, but that it was mislaid or lost.

That fact, however, does not authorize this proceeding which contemplates a single appeal against Edmonds and the Ironton Lumber Company who have recovered separate judgments.

The controversy between Matney and the Ironton Lumber Company is entirely separate and distinct from the controversy between Matney and Edmonds; and, they resulted in separate judgments. If Matney and Bevins desire to review the judgment which passed upon the controversy between them and the Ironton Lumber Company for $3,447.50,' as is contemplated by the present motion, they should proceed by a separate appeal against the Ironton Lumber Company.

The code does not contemplate a single appeal from separate judgments in favor of different parties, as the tendered statement proposes.

An appeal is prosecuted by making the statement required by section 739 of the code, and paying the tax thereon. Where several parties who have recovered separate judgments are jointly named as appellees in one statement of appeal, and one tax is paid, as here, there is only one appeal; and, the party first named as an appellee is the only appellee. It is not claimed that *838there was a separate appeal against the Ironton Lumber Company, or that a tax has been paid upon any such appeal. So, the motion, if permissible, would not accomplish the purpose intended by it.

However, as this judgment was entered on June 7, 1916, appellants still have ample time to prosecute an appeal against the Ironton Lumber Company, if they desire to do so; and that may be done upon this record.

Petition and motion overruled.
§ 1612.10 Recordkeeping and accounting for activities funded with non-LSC funds. ( a ) No funds made available by the Corporation shall be used to pay for administrative overhead or related costs associated with any activity listed in § 1612.6.
( b ) Recipients shall maintain separate records documenting the expenditure of non-LSC funds for legislative and rulemaking activities permitted by § 1612.6.
( c ) Recipients shall submit semi-annual reports describing their legislative activities with non-LSC funds conducted pursuant to § 1612.6, together with such supporting documentation as specified by the Corporation.
[62 FR 19404, Apr. 21, 1997; 62 FR 22895, Apr. 28, 1997]
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO § 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Private Media Group, Inc. (the
Company) for the quarterly period ending June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Ilan Bunimovitz, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Johan Gillborg,
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Ilan Bunimovitz    
|Ilan Bunimovitz        
|Chief Executive Officer

August 14, 2009



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Johan Gillborg     
|Johan Gillborg         
|Chief Financial Officer

August 14, 2009

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 24 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by 

the United States Fish and Wildlife Service relating to 

‘‘Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Endangered Species Status for Northern Long-Eared Bat’’. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the 

4 United States Fish and Wildlife Service relating to ‘‘En5 dangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Endan6 gered Species Status for Northern Long-Eared Bat’’ (87 

7 Fed. Reg. 73488 (November 30, 2022)), and such rule 

8 shall have no force or effect. 

Passed the Senate May 11, 2023. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 
118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 24 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapfor Northern Long-Eared Bat’’. Wildlife and Plants; Endangered Species Status Service relating to ‘‘Endangered and Threatened submitted by the United States Fish and Wildlife ter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule