alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Integrated Media
Holdings,  Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period
ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Rene A. Schena certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:







(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and







(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.







/s/  Rene
A. Schena





Rene A.
Schena


Chief
Financial Officer




May 19,
2008
SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

ONE HUNDRED FOURTH CONGRESS 

FffiST SESSION { CONVENED JANUARY 4, 1995 

SECOND SESSION { 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Friday, May 19, 1995 

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF SHEILA P. BURKE, SECRETARY OF THE SENATE 

By Gerald A. Hackett, Executive Clerk 
1 

RESOLUTIONS 

CALENDAR Ex REs REPO!m:D 

No No SUBJECJ' BY 
2 

TREATIES 

CALENDAR TREATY REPORTED 

No Doc No SUBJECT BY 
3 

NOMINATIONS 

CALENDAR MEsSAGE REPORTED 

No No NOMINEE, OFFICE, AND PREDEOESSOR BY 

WULROADRETIREMENTBOARD 

* 101 32 Virgil M. Speakman, of Ohio, to be a Member of Mar 29, 95 Reported by Mrs. 

the Railroad Retirement Board, for a term Kassebaum, Committee on Labor 

expiring August 28, 1999. (Reappointment) and Human Resources, without 

printed report. 

[NEW REPORTS] 

EXECUTIVE OF:FICE OF THE PRESIDENT 

117 45 Rose OchiJ of California, to be an Associate May 18, 95 Reported by Mr. Hatch, 

Director for National Drug Control Policy, vice Committee on the Judiciary, 

Kay Coles James, resigned. without printed report. 

THE JUDICIARY 

118 176 Susan Y.lllston, ofCalifornia, to be United May 18, 95 Reported by Mr. Hatch, 

States District Judge for the Northern District Committee on the Judiciary, 

of California vice Barbara A. Caulfield, without printed report. 

resigned. 

119 306 George A. O'Toole, Jr., of Massachusetts, to be May 18, 95 Reported by Mr. Hatch, 

United States District Judge for the District of Committee on the Judiciary, 

Massachusetts vice an additional position in without printed report. 

accordance with 28 USC 133(b)(l ). 

120 305 John GarvanMurtha, ofVerm.ont, to be United May 18, 95 Reported by Mr. Hatch, 

States District Judge for the District of Committee on the Judiciary, 

Vermont vice Franklin S. Billings, Jr., retired. without printed report. 

121 270 Mary Beck Briscoe, of Kansas, to be United May 18, 95 Reported by Mr. Hatch, 

States Circuit Judge for the Tenth Circuit, vice Committee on the Judiciary, 

James K Logan, retired. without pnnted report. 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

122 376 Patrick M. Ryan, of Oklahoma, to be United May 18, 95 Reported by Mr. Hatch, 

States Attorney for the Western District of Committee on the Judiciary, 

Oklahoma for the term of four years, vice Vicki without printed report. 

Miles-LaGrange, resigned. 

123 49 George K McKinney, ofMaryland, to be United May 18, .95 Reported by Mr. Hatch, 

States Marshal for the District of Maryland for Committee on the .Judiciary, 

the tenn of four years, vice Scott Alan Sewell without printed report. 

* Slgntfies n.onunee's oomrmtment to respond to requests to appear and testtfy before any duly oonstttuted commtttee of t·he Senate 
4 

NOMINATIONS PLACED ON THE SECRETARY'S DESK
#### § 1173.2 [Reserved]
|Exhibit 10.6(a)
|---------------

AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE

AMENDED AND RESTATED SAN JOAQUIN BANCORP/MACLIN

EXECUTIVE SALARY COTINUATION AGREEMENT

WHEREAS, San Joaquin Bancorp, formerly San Joaquin Bank, (the Employer) and Bruce Maclin (the Executive) entered into an Amended and
Restated Executive Salary Continuation Agreement on October 3, 1996, amended and restated on June 18, 2004, (the Agreement);

WHEREAS, the Agreement provides (in Section 10.10) that the Agreement may be amended in a writing signed by each party to the Agreement; and

WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the Agreement to provide that payments to the Executive will begin on the earlier of the date the Executive attains age 65
or the date the Executive retires.

NOW, THEREFORE, the Agreement is hereby amended effective as of December 31, 2006 as follows:

1. Section 3.1 (Payments) is replaced in its entirety with the following:

Payments Upon Retirement Date.If the Executive shall remain in the continuous employment of the Employer until his Retirement Date, regardless whether the Executive continues to work past his Retirement Date, the Annual
Benefit, as defined above, shall be paid in the form of a Joint and Survivor Annuity. Each year the Annual Benefit will be paid in twelve (12) equal monthly payments on the first day of each month during the year, beginning with the month following
the Retirement Date, regardless whether the Executive continues to work past his Retirement Date.

2. A new Section 10.13 (Code Section 409A) is added as follows:

Code Section 409A.This Agreement is intended to conform to the provisions of Code Section 409A and each provision of the Agreement shall be interpreted and administered accordingly. In the event that any provision that is necessary for the
Agreement to comply with Section 409A is determined by the Committee to have been omitted, such omitted provision shall be deemed included in the Agreement and is hereby incorporation as part of the Agreement.



|Signature page to follow
|------------------------

---

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Employer and the Executive have executed this Agreement on December 19, 2006 in the City of Bakersfield, California.



|EMPLOYER:
|---------



|SAN JOAQUIN BANCORP
|-------------------



|By: /S/ Bart Hill Bart Hill, President | 
|-------------------------------------- | 



|By: /S/ Stephen M. Annis___________Stephen M. Annis, CFO Cashier
|----------------------------------------------------------------



|EXECUTIVE:
|----------

/S/ Bruce Maclin

Bruce Maclin



|
|



|
|

- 2 -

---
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 792 

To amend the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Act of 1996 

to provide certain Federal public benefits to citizens of the Federated 

States of Micronesia, the Republic of the Marshall Islands, and the 

Republic of Palau who are lawfully residing in the United States if 

they are otherwise qualified, consistent with section 141 of the Compacts 

of Free Association. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 14, 2023 

Ms. HIRONO (for herself, Mr. BOOZMAN, and Mr. SCHATZ) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity 

Act of 1996 to provide certain Federal public benefits 

to citizens of the Federated States of Micronesia, the 

Republic of the Marshall Islands, and the Republic of 

Palau who are lawfully residing in the United States 

if they are otherwise qualified, consistent with section 

141 of the Compacts of Free Association. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 792 IS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Compact Impact Fair3 ness Act of 2023’’. 

4 SEC. 2. PROVISION OF FEDERAL PUBLIC BENEFIT ELIGI5 BILITY FOR CITIZENS OF FREELY ASSOCI6 ATED STATES. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 402 of the Personal Re8 sponsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 

9 1996 (8 U.S.C. 1612) is amended— 

10 (1) in subsection (a)(2), by adding at the end 

11 the following: 

12 ‘‘(N) EXCEPTION FOR CITIZENS OF FREE13 LY ASSOCIATED STATES.—With respect to eligi14 bility for benefits for any specified Federal pro15 gram, paragraph (1) shall not apply to any in16 dividual who lawfully resides in the United 

17 States in accordance with section 141 of the 

18 Compacts of Free Association between the Gov19 ernment of the United States and the Govern20 ments of the Federated States of Micronesia, 

21 the Republic of the Marshall Islands, and the 

22 Republic of Palau, and who is a citizen of one 

23 of those three nations.’’; and 

24 (2) in subsection (b)(2)(G)— 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•S 792 IS

1 (A) in the subparagraph heading, by strik2 ing ‘‘MEDICAID EXCEPTION FOR’’ and inserting 

3 ‘‘EXCEPTION FOR’’; and 

4 (B) by striking ‘‘the designated Federal 

5 program defined in paragraph (3)(C) (relating 

6 to the Medicaid program)’’ and inserting ‘‘any 

7 designated Federal program’’. 

8 (b) EXCEPTION TO 5-YEAR WAIT REQUIREMENT.— 

9 Section 403(b)(3) of such Act (8 U.S.C. 1613(b)(3)) is 

10 amended by striking ‘‘, but only with respect to the des11 ignated Federal program defined in section 

12 402(b)(3)(C)’’. 

13 (c) DEFINITION OF QUALIFIED ALIEN.—Section 

14 431(b)(8) of such Act (8 U.S.C. 1641(b)(8)) is amended 

15 by striking ‘‘, but only with respect to the designated Fed16 eral program defined in section 402(b)(3)(C) (relating to 

17 the Medicaid program)’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                             639,430
<SECURITIES>                                     7,823,530
<RECEIVABLES>                                      226,966
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 8,883,785
<PP&E>                                             319,362
<DEPRECIATION>                                    (157,652)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   9,500,114
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              369,829
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                               463
<OTHER-SE>                                       9,129,822
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     9,500,114
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   288,835
<CGS>                                               54,327
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       54,327
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,737,786
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                59,419
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (2,562,697)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (2,562,697)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 (3,672,656)
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (6,235,353)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (2.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (2.11)



</TABLE>
#### §§ 1153.112-1153.129 [Reserved]
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 20 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 20

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Justice 
and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives relating to 
``Factoring Criteria for Firearms With Attached `Stabilizing Braces'''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 15, 2023

 Mr. Kennedy (for himself, Mr. Marshall, Mr. Hagerty, Mr. Cramer, Mr. 
 Lee, Mr. Cornyn, Mrs. Blackburn, Mr. McConnell, Mr. Risch, Mr. Crapo, 
Mr. Cruz, Mr. Scott of Florida, Mr. Mullin, Mr. Wicker, Mr. Hawley, Mr. 
 Tillis, Mr. Lankford, Mr. Johnson, Mr. Cotton, Mrs. Hyde-Smith, Mrs. 
 Fischer, Mr. Daines, Mr. Thune, Ms. Ernst, Mr. Graham, Mr. Vance, Mr. 
Braun, Mr. Young, Mr. Boozman, Ms. Lummis, Mr. Barrasso, Mr. Budd, Mr. 
 Hoeven, Mr. Moran, Mr. Paul, Mr. Romney, Mr. Grassley, Mr. Sullivan, 
 Mr. Cassidy, Mr. Rounds, Mrs. Britt, Mr. Tuberville, Mr. Schmitt, Mr. 
 Ricketts, Mrs. Capito, and Mr. Rubio) introduced the following joint 
 resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the 
                               Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Justice 
and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives relating to 
``Factoring Criteria for Firearms With Attached `Stabilizing Braces'''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Department of Justice and the Bureau of Alcohol, 
Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives relating to ``Factoring Criteria for 
Firearms With Attached `Stabilizing Braces''' (88 Fed. Reg. 6478 
(January 31, 2023)), and such rule shall have no force or effect.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7391

CLIFTON THOMPSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District

Judge. (CA-97-1299-AM)

Submitted: March 12, 1998 Decided: March 24, 1998

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Clifton Thompson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.

1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Thompson v. Virginia, No. CA-97-1299-AM (E.D. Va.

Sept. 3, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Joint Committee on Taxation
September 18, 1995
JCX-38-95

EXTEND ACCESS TO TAX INFORMATION FOR THE
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

Scheduled for Markup
by the
Committee on Ways and Means
on September 18, 1995

Present Law

The Internal Revenue Code prohibits disclosure of tax returns and return information,
except to the extent specifically authorized by the Internal Revenue Code (sec. 6103).
Unauthorized disclosure is a felony punishable by a fine not exceeding $5,000 or imprisonment of
not more than five years, or both (sec. 7213). An action for civil damages also may be brought
for unauthorized disclosure (sec. 7431). No tax information may be furnished by the Internal
Revenue Service (IRS) to another agency unless the other agency establishes procedures
satisfactory to the IRS for safeguarding the tax information it receives (sec. 6103(p)).

Among the disclosures permitted under the Code is disclosure to the Department of
Veterans Affairs (DVA) of self-employment tax information and certain tax information supplied
to the Internal Revenue Service and Social Security Administration by third parties. Disclosure is
permitted to assist DVA in determining eligibility for, and establishing correct benefit amounts
under, certain of its needs-based pension, health care, and other programs (sec.
6103(1)(7)(D)\{viii)). The income tax returns filed by the veterans themselves are not disclosed to
DVA.

The DVA is required to comply with the safeguards currently contained in the Code and in
section 1137(c) of the Social Security Act (governing the use of disclosed tax information).
These safeguards include independent verification of tax data, notification to the individual
concerned, and the opportunity to contest agency findings based on such information.

The DVA disclosure provision is scheduled to expire after September 30, 1998.

Description of Proposal

The proposal would permanently extend the authority to disclose tax information to the
DVA.

Effective Date

The proposal would be effective on the date of enactment.
Tags:

                          - Consumer Protection
                          - Advertising and Marketing
                          - Online Advertising and Marketing

June 2004

Text of the Commission Report(1.33 MB)

## Related Releases

New System to Verify Origins of E-Mail Must Emerge Before Do Not Spam List Can Be Implemented, FTC Tells Congress

**Return to top
No. 5153.

#### Lormy Sanderson *v.*The State.

Opinion delivered June 11, 1887.

Carrying a Pistol—Pact Case.—See the opinion for evidence *held*insufficient to support a conviction for carrying a pistol.

Appeal from the County Court of McLennan. Tried below before the Hon. W. W. Evans, County Judge.

The opinion states the case. The penalty assessed was a fine of twenty-five dollars.

*Anderson, Mint & Anderson,*for the appellant.

*W. L. Davidson,*Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Hurt, Judge.

Upon the following testimony appellant was convicted of unlawfully carrying a pistol:

J. W. Simpson testified: One day last February, in McLennan county, Texas, witness and defendant were riding along the road going after wood, and a rabbit jumped up, and he, witness, handed defendant his, witness’s, pistol, and asked defendant to shoot the rabbit. Defendant took the pistol, walked a step or two, shot at the rabbit and handed it back to witness.

The evidence does not support the conviction. (Cathey v. The State, ante p. 492.)

*Reversed and remanded.*
Name: ________________________________________________________________________________

Organization: __________________________________________________________________________

E-mail address: ________________________________________________________________________

Questions for FEC presenters: 

______________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________

Note: Registrations for this event are processed on a first-come, first-served basis. Attendance at 

FECConnect OnTopic is limited, and not all registrants are guaranteed attendance. Registrants will 

receive an email on April 19, with log-in information and instructions.

Email this completed form to OnTopic@fec.gov 

FECConnect OnTopic Registration Form

48 Hour Notices for Last Minute 

Contributions/Loans

April 20, 2022 — 11:00 AM Eastern
§ 1351.18 What criteria has HHS established for deciding which Runaway and Homeless Youth Program grant applications to fund? In reviewing applications for a Runaway and Homeless Youth Program grant, HHS takes into consideration a number of factors, including, but not limited to: ( a ) Whether the grant application meets the particular priorities, requirements, standards, or evaluation criteria established in funding opportunity announcements;
( b ) A need for Federal support based on the likely number of estimated runaway or otherwise homeless youth in the area in which the Runaway and Homeless Youth project is or will be located exceeding the availability of existing services for such youth in that area;
( c ) For runaway and homeless youth centers, whether there is a minimum residential capacity of four (4) and a maximum residential capacity of twenty (20) youth in a single structure (except where the applicant assures that the state where the center or locally controlled facility is located has a state or local law or regulation that requires a higher maximum to comply with licensure requirements for child and youth serving facilities), or within a single floor of a structure in the case of apartment buildings, with a number of staff sufficient to assure adequate supervision and treatment for the number of clients to be served and the guidelines followed for determining the appropriate staff ratio;
( d ) Plans for meeting the best interests of the youth involving, when reasonably possible, both the youth and the family. For Basic Center grantee applicants, the grantee shall develop adequate plans for contacting the parents or other relatives of the youth and ensuring the safe return of the youth according to the best interests of the youth, for contacting local government officials pursuant to informal arrangements established with such officials by the runaway and homeless youth center, and for providing for other appropriate alternative living arrangements;
( e ) Plans for the delivery of aftercare or counseling services to runaway or otherwise homeless youth and their families;
( f ) Whether the estimated cost to HHS for the Runaway and Homeless Youth project is reasonable considering the anticipated results;
( g ) Whether the proposed personnel are well qualified and the applicant agency has adequate facilities and resources;
( h ) Past performance on a RHY grant, including but not limited to program performance standards;
( i ) Whether the proposed project design, if well executed, is capable of attaining program objectives;
( j ) The consistency of the grant application with the provisions of the Act and these regulations; and
( k ) Other factors as outlined in funding opportunity announcements.
[81 FR 93061, Dec. 20, 2016]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 17-22643-Civ-COOKE/GOODMAN

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION,

Plaintiff,

vs.

DAVID RIVERA,

Defendant.

___________________________________________/

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S 

MOTION TO DISMISS 

THIS MATTER comes before me on Defendant David Rivera’s Motion to Dismiss the 

Amended Complaint (ECF No. 42). I have reviewed Defendant’s Motion, the record, the 

relevant legal authorities, and the arguments made by the parties at the Motion Hearing on 

April 16, 2019.

For the reasons stated at the Motion Hearing, it is hereby ORDERED and 

ADJUDGED that David Rivera’s Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim is DENIED.

DONE and ORDERED in chambers at Miami, Florida, this 16th day of April 2019.

Copies furnished to: 

Jonathan Goodman, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Counsel of record

Case 1:17-cv-22643-MGC Document 48 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/16/2019 Page 1 of 1