alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1622.8 Records of closed meetings. ( a ) The Secretary shall make a complete transcript or electronic recording adequate to record fully the proceedings of each meeting or portion thereof closed to the public, except that in the case of meeting or any portion thereof closed to the public pursuant to paragraph (h) of § 1622.5, a transcript, a recording, or a set of minutes shall be made. Any such minutes shall describe all matters discussed and shall provide a summary of any actions taken and the reasons therefor, including a description of each Director's views expressed on any item and the record of each Director's vote on the question. All documents considered in connection with any action shall be identified in the minutes.
( b ) A complete copy of the transcript, recording, or minutes required by paragraph (a) of this section shall be maintained at the Corporation for a Board or committee meeting, and at the appropriate Regional Office for a council meeting, for a period of two years after the meeting, or until one year after the conclusion of any Corporation proceeding with respect to which the meeting was held, whichever occurs later.
( c ) The Corporation shall make available to the public all portions of the transcript, recording, or minutes required by paragraph (a) of this section that do not contain information that may be withheld under § 1622.5. A copy of those portions of the transcript, recording, or minutes that are available to the public shall be furnished to any person upon request at the actual cost of duplication or transcription.
( d ) Copies of Corporation records other than notices or records prepared under this part may be pursued in accordance with part 1602 of these regulations.
§ 162.930 Additional rules for health care clearinghouses. When acting as a business associate for another covered entity, a health care clearinghouse may perform the following functions: ( a ) Receive a standard transaction on behalf of the covered entity and translate it into a nonstandard transaction (for example, nonstandard format and/or nonstandard data content) for transmission to the covered entity.
( b ) Receive a nonstandard transaction (for example, nonstandard format and/or nonstandard data content) from the covered entity and translate it into a standard transaction for transmission on behalf of the covered entity.
Exhibit 32(b)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Annual Report on Form 10-K of Alberto Culver Company (the company) for the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ralph J. Nicoletti, Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of the company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|/s/    Ralph J.
Nicoletti                           
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

November 24, 2009
BILLING CODE: 6715-01-M 

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Notice

TIME AND DATE:

THURSDAY, DECEMBER 2, 2021 AT 10:00 A.M.

PLACE:

VIRTUAL HEARING. NOTE: BECAUSE OF THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC, WE WILL 

CONDUCT THE HEARING VIRTUALLY. IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO ACCESS THE 

HEARING, SEE THE INSTRUCTIONS BELOW.

STATUS:

THIS HEARING WILL BE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC. TO ACCESS THE VIRTUAL 

HEARING, GO TO THE COMMISSION’S WEBSITE www.fec.gov AND CLICK ON THE 

BANNER TO BE TAKEN TO THE HEARING PAGE.

MATTER TO BE CONSIDERED:

Audit Hearing: Democracy Engine, Inc. PAC

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Judith Ingram, Press Officer

Telephone: (202) 694-1220

Authority: Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b

Signed: _______________________________

Laura E. Sinram

Acting Secretary and Clerk of the Commission

Submitted: November 17, 2021
BILLING CODE: 6715-01-M

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

Sunshine Act Meeting

FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION NOTICE OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT:

86 FR 1970

PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME, DATE, AND PLACE OF THE MEETING:

THURSDAY, JANUARY 14, 2021 AT 10:00 A.M.

VIRTUAL MEETING

CHANGES IN THE MEETING:

The matter number for the following item has been corrected: Audit Division 

Recommendation Memorandum on the Mississippi Republican Party (A17-15)

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Judith Ingram, Press Officer

Telephone: (202) 694-1220

Authority: Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b

Signed: _____________________________________

Laura E. Sinram 

Acting Secretary and Clerk of the Commission

Submitted: January 11, 2021
## Court of Appeals
Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

In the Interest of J.L.J., a Child

No. 06

- 21

- 00032

- CV Appeal from the 276th District Court of

Titus County, Texas (Tr. Ct

. No. 41838 ).
Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice

Burgess

, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice
Stevens participating

.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that the appeal should be dismissed

for want of prosecu tion . Therefore, we dismiss the appeal.

We further order that the appellant pay all costs incurred by reason of this appeal.

REN DERED JULY 2, 2021

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:
Debra K. Autrey , Clerk
III 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 11 

Expressing the need for the Senate to provide advice and consent to 

ratification of the United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 31 (legislative day, MAY 30), 2023 

Mr. PADILLA submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Expressing the need for the Senate to provide advice and 

consent to ratification of the United Nations Convention 

on Biological Diversity. 

Whereas human actions are contributing to an unprecedented 

and increasing loss of biodiversity worldwide; 

Whereas nearly 1,000,000 species could be threatened with 

extinction; 

Whereas every United Nations member state has ratified the 

Convention on Biological Diversity, done at Rio de Janeiro June 5, 1992, with the exception of the United States; 

Whereas the United States signed the Convention on Biological Diversity in 1993 but has not ratified the treaty; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•SCON 11 IS 

Whereas the United States, under current domestic law, is already legally compliant with the obligations of the Convention; 

Whereas Federal agencies often design their plans to align 

with Convention on Biological Diversity initiatives; 

Whereas the absence of the United States from the Convention on Biological Diversity limits the United States to 

holding the status of an ‘‘observer’’ to deliberations and 

decision making processes of the Convention on Biodiversity; 

Whereas, not being party to the Convention on Biological Diversity, the United States does not have a vote within the 

convention, which diminishes our voice and influence; 

Whereas the decisions and rules made by the Convention on 

Biological Diversity affect both national security and economic interests of the United States in spite of the 

United States non-party status; 

Whereas the United States is one of the world’s largest contributors in international conservation funding and biological diversity expertise; and 

Whereas we are inextricably interconnected on this planet, 

and the work of the Convention on Biological Diversity 

has a direct impact on all Americans: Now, therefore, be 

it 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), That it is in the national interest for the Sen3 ate to provide its advice and consent for the ratification 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•SCON 11 IS 

1 of the Convention on Biological Diversity, which was 

2 signed by the United States in New York on June 4, 1993. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 99.2


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Tire Distributors, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 29, 2002, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
William E. Berry, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge, based upon a review of the Report:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.


/s/ WILLIAM E. BERRY
-------------------------------------------
William E. Berry
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
American Tire Distributors, Inc.
August 12, 2002
§ 149.130 Preventing surprise medical bills for air ambulance services. ( a ) *In general.* If a group health plan, or a health insurance issuer offering group or individual health insurance coverage, provides or covers any benefits for air ambulance services, the plan or issuer must cover such services from a nonparticipating provider of air ambulance services in accordance with paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) *Coverage requirements.* A plan or issuer described in paragraph (a) of this section must provide coverage of air ambulance services in the following manner— ( 1 ) The cost-sharing requirements with respect to the services must be the same requirements that would apply if the services were provided by a participating provider of air ambulance services.
( 2 ) The cost-sharing requirement must be calculated as if the total amount that would have been charged for the services by a participating provider of air ambulance services were equal to the lesser of the qualifying payment amount (as determined in accordance with § 149.140) or the billed amount for the services.
( 3 ) The cost-sharing amounts must be counted towards any in-network deductible and in-network out-of-pocket maximums (including the annual limitation on cost sharing under section 2707(b) of the PHS Act) (as applicable) applied under the plan or coverage (and the in-network deductible and out-of-pocket maximums must be applied) in the same manner as if the cost-sharing payments were made with respect to services furnished by a participating provider of air ambulance services.
( 4 ) The plan or issuer must— ( i ) Not later than 30 calendar days after the bill for the services is transmitted by the provider of air ambulance services, determine whether the services are covered under the plan or coverage and, if the services are covered, send to the provider an initial payment or a notice of denial of payment. For purposes of this paragraph (b)(4)(i), the 30-calendar-day period begins on the date the plan or issuer receives the information necessary to decide a claim for payment for the services.
( ii ) Pay a total plan or coverage payment directly to the nonparticipating provider furnishing such air ambulance services that is equal to the amount by which the out-of-network rate for the services exceeds the cost-sharing amount for the services (as determined in accordance with paragraphs (b)(1) and (2) of this section), less any initial payment amount made under paragraph (b)(4)(i) of this section. The total plan or coverage payment must be made in accordance with the timing requirement described in section 2799A-2(b)(6) of the PHS Act, or in cases where the out-of-network rate is determined under a specified State law or All-Payer Model Agreement, such other timeframe as specified by the State law or All-Payer Model Agreement.
( c ) *Applicability date.* The provisions of this section are applicable with respect to plan years (in the individual market, policy years) beginning on or after January 1, 2022.
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

Elementary Secondary EducationFaculty DevelopmentForeign CountriesHigher EducationInservice Teacher EducationPreservice Teacher EducationStudent TeachingTeacher Improvement

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
NUMBER 13-09-00209-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

GREGORY A. BEAVERS, ET AL., Appellants,

v.

SOUTHWESTERN REFINING COMPANY, INC., Appellee. 

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 347th District Court 

of Nueces County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez, Vela, and Perkes 

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

This appeal was abated by this Court on April 23, 2009, due to the bankruptcy of 

one of the parties to this appeal. See 11 U.S.C. ' 362; see generally TEX. R. APP. P. 8. 

The parties have filed an agreed motion to dismiss with prejudice all claims asserted by 

parties against Southwestern Refining Company, Inc. The parties request that this Court 
2

dismiss with prejudice all claims asserted by the parties against Southwestern Refining 

Company, Inc. Accordingly, this case is hereby REINSTATED.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and the agreed motion to 

dismiss with prejudice, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 42.1(a). The agreed motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal of all claims 

asserted by the parties against Southwestern Refining Company, Inc., is hereby

DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 

In accordance with the agreement of the parties, costs are taxed against the party 

incurring same. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court 

will tax costs against the appellant."). Having dismissed the appeal at appellant's 

request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the 20th 

day of October, 2011.
§ 101.35 Extension of priority ratings. ( a ) A person must use rated orders with suppliers to obtain items or services needed to fill a rated order. The person must use the priority rating indicated on the customer's rated order, except as otherwise provided in this part or as directed by HHS.
( b ) The priority rating must be included on each successive order placed to obtain items or services needed to fill a customer's rated order. This continues from contractor to subcontractor to supplier throughout the entire procurement chain.
#### § 157.20 Definitions.

The following definitions apply to this part, unless otherwise indicated:

*Federally-facilitated SHOP* has the meaning given to the term in § 155.20 of this subchapter.

*Full-time employee* has the meaning given to the term in § 155.20 of this subchapter.

*Large employer* has the meaning given to the term in § 155.20 of this subchapter.

*Qualified employee* has the meaning given to the term in § 155.20 of this subchapter.

*Qualified employer* has the meaning given to the term in § 155.20 of this subchapter.

*Small employer* has the meaning given to the term in § 155.20 of this subchapter.

[77 FR 18474, Mar. 27, 2012, as amended at 78 FR 15539, Mar. 11, 2013]
§ 1614.10 Failure to comply. ( a ) ( 1 ) If a recipient fails to comply with the expenditure required by this part *and* that recipient fails without good cause to seek a waiver during the term of the grant or contract, the Corporation shall withhold from the recipient's grant payments an amount equal to the difference between the amount expended on PAI and twelve and one-half percent (12.5%) of the recipient's basic field award.
( 2 ) If the Corporation determines that a recipient failed without good cause to seek a waiver, the Corporation shall give the recipient written notice of that determination. The written notice shall state the determination, the amount to be withheld, and the process by which the recipient may appeal the determination.
( 3 ) The appeal process will follow the procedures for the appeal of disallowed costs set forth at 45 CFR 1630.7(c)-(g), except that: ( i ) The subject matter of the appeal shall be limited to the Corporation's determination that the recipient failed without good cause to seek a waiver; and
( ii ) Withholding of funds shall be the method for the Corporation to recover the amount to be withheld.
( b ) If a recipient fails with good cause to seek a waiver, or applies for but does not receive a waiver, or receives a waiver of part of the PAI requirement and does not expend the amount required to be expended, the PAI expenditure requirement for the ensuing year shall be increased for that recipient by an amount equal to the difference between the amount actually expended and the amount required to be expended.
( c ) ( 1 ) Any funds withheld by the Corporation pursuant to this section shall be made available by the Corporation for use in providing legal services through PAI programs. When such funds are available for competition, LSC shall publish notice of the requirements concerning time, format, and content of the application and the procedures for submitting an application for such funds. Disbursement of these funds for PAI activities shall be made through a competitive solicitation and awarded on the basis of efficiency, quality, creativity, and demonstrated commitment to PAI service delivery to low-income people. Competition for these funds may be held in the recipient's service area, or if the recipient from which funds are withheld is the only LSC recipient applying for the funds in the competitive solicitation, in additional service areas.
( 2 ) Recipients shall expend funds awarded through the competitive process in paragraph (c)(1) of this section in addition to twelve and one-half percent (12.5%) of their Basic Field-General awards.
( d ) The withholding of funds under this section shall not be construed as any action under 45 CFR parts 1606, 1618, 1623, or 1630.
SERVED: October 21, 2013 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

, WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

ABO SUPPLY LLC 

FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. FAA 2013-0713 

NOTICE 

Ira Leibowitz, Attorney-Advisor retired on September 30, 2013. 

All future communications should be directed to the undersigned at: 

Richard C. Goodwin, 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Office ofHearings, Attn: Room E11-310 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey, S.E. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

(Richard. Goodwin@dot. gov) 

Administrative matters should be directed to Patricia Matthews, Staff Assistant (202) 

366-5121 (Patricia.Matthews@dot.gov) 

Richard C. Goodwin 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment - Service List 
SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1 0001 

Scott L. Johnston, Respondent's Counsel 

Givens & Johnston, PLLC 

950 Echo Lane, Suite 360 

Houston, TX 77024-2788 

TEL: 713-932-1540 

FAX: 713-932-1542 

WATTS: 800-285-8042 

ONE COPY 

EMAIL: sjohnston@givensjohnston.com 

James Archier, Complainant's Counsel 

Attorney, Office of the· Regional Counsel 

Southwest Region, ASW-7 

Federal Aviation Administration 

2601 Meacham Blvd., Suite 679 

Fort Worth, TX 7613'7 

TEL: 817-222-5074 

FAX: 817-222-5945/5092 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-5121 Legal Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

FDMS Nos. FAA-2013-0713 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WIOOO, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

2
EXHIBIT 32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the annual report of Umami Sustainable Seafood Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, Oli Valur Steindorsson, Chief Executive Officer, and Daniel G. Zang, Chief Financial Officer, certify. pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:





(1) This report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Oli Valur Steindorsson

/s/ Daniel G. ZangChief Executive Officer

Principal Executive Officer

Chief Financial Officer

Principal Financial and Accounting OfficerDate: November 14, 2011

Date: November 14, 2011