alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

November 21, 2011 

t1114 

Order 

 

November 21, 2011 

143511-2 & (71) 

JOHN H. BULTEMA, II, and DEBORAH H. 

BULTEMA, 

Plaintiffs/Counter-DefendantsAppellants/Cross-Appellees, 

v SC: 143511 

 COA: 296727 

Muskegon CC: 07-045462-CB 

STEVEN W. ONGERT and KATHY D. 

ONGERT, 

Defendants/Counter-PlaintiffsAppellees/Cross-Appellants. 

_________________________________________/ 

STEVEN W. ONGERT and KATHY D. 

ONGERT, 

Plaintiffs-Appellees, 

Cross-Appellants, 

v SC: 143512 

 COA: 296728 

Muskegon CC: 07-045541-CB 

JOHN H. BULTEMA, II, and DEBORAH H. 

BULTEMA, 

Defendants-Appellants, 

Cross-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 23, 2011 

judgment of the Court of Appeals and the application for leave to appeal as crossappellant are considered, and they are DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the 

questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Certification Pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002



In connection with this Annual Report of Tradeshow Products, Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the year ending September 30, 2006 as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Tiffany Miller, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of Tradeshow, certify, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Tradeshow Products, Inc. as of and for the periods presented in the Report.

Date: January 16, 2007

/s/ Tiffany Miller

Tiffany Miller

Chief Executive Officer

Date: January 16, 2007

/s/ Tiffany Miller

Tiffany Miller

Principal Financial Officer
§ 1225.15 Notification and opting out. ( a ) Upon acceptance of a class complaint, the agency, within 30 calendar days, shall use reasonable means such as delivery, mailing, distribution, or posting, to notify all class members of the existence of the class complaint.
( b ) A notice shall contain: ( 1 ) The name of the agency or organizational segment thereof, its location and the date of acceptance of the complaint:
( 2 ) A description of the issues accepted as part of the class complaint;
( 3 ) An explanation that class members may remove themselves from the class by notifying the agency within 30 calendar days after issuance of the notice; and
( 4 ) An explanation of the binding nature of the final decision or resolution of the complaint.
<PAGE>1

                                 Exhibit 15



INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANT'S REPORT

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders
Credit Concepts, Inc.

We have reviewed the accompanying balance sheet of Credit Concepts, Inc. as of
April 30, 2000, and the related statements of income, stockholders' equity, and
cash flows for the three-month and nine-month periods ended April 30, 2000.
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.

We conducted our review in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A review of interim
financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to
financial data and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and
accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted
in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, the objective of
which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken
as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should
be made to the financial statements referred to above for them to be in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.

We have previously audited, in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards, the balance sheet of Credit Concepts, Inc. as of July 31, 1999, and
the related statements of income, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the
year then ended not presented herein; and in our report dated September 15,
1999, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements. In our
opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying balance sheet as of July
31, 1999, is fairly presented, in all material respects, in relation to the
balance sheet from which it has been derived.


Moss Adams LLP
Portland, Oregon
June 7, 2000
CERTIFICATIONS OF CFO PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

Exhibit 31.2

                            CERTIFICATIONS

I, Bruce A. Hall, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Knight Energy
Corp. (the "Registrant");

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the consolidated financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the consolidated financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;

4. The Registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant
and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's
most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the
case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over
financial reporting; and

5. The Registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the Registrant's independent registered public accounting
firm and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or
persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.

July 18, 2007

/s/ Bruce A. Hall
-----------------------------
Bruce A. Hall
Principal Financial Officer
118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 32 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by 

the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating 

to ‘‘Small Business Lending Under the Equal Credit 

Opportunity Act (Regulation B)’’. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the Bu4 reau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to ‘‘Small 

5 Business Lending Under the Equal Credit Opportunity 

6 Act (Regulation B)’’ (88 Fed. Reg. 35150 (May 31, 

7 2023)), and such rule shall have no force or effect. 

Passed the Senate October 18, 2023. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 
118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 32 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chaplation B)’’. Under the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (Regu- Protection relating to ‘‘Small Business Lending submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial ter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Department of Interior, Office of the Secretary

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces an upcoming meeting of the Delaware & Lehigh National Heritage Corridor Commission. Notice of this meeting is required under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463).

# MEETING DATE AND TIME: 

Thursday, November 9, 2006—1:30 p.m. to 4 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

Emrick Technology Center, 2750 Hugh Moore Park Road, Easton, PA 18042.

The agenda for the meeting will focus on implementation of the Management Action Plan for the Delaware & Lehigh National Heritage Corridor and State Heritage Park. The Commission was established to assist the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and its political subdivisions in planning and implementing an integrated strategy for protecting and promoting cultural, historic and natural resources. The Commission reports to the Secretary of the Interior and to Congress.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Delaware & Lehigh National Heritage Corridor Commission was established by Public Law 100-692, November 18, 1988 and extended through Public Law 105-355, November 13, 1998.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

C. Allen Sachse, Executive Director, Delaware & Lehigh National Heritage Corridor Commission, 2750 Hugh Moore Park Road, Easton PA 18042, (610) 923-3548.

Dated: October 27, 2006.

C. Allen Sachse,

Executive Director, Delaware & Lehigh National Heritage Corridor Commission.

[FR Doc. 06-9015  Filed 11-1-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6820-PE-M
August 4, 2000
<P>
Gregg E. Jaclin, Esq.
4400 Route 9, 2nd Floor
Freehold, New Jersey 07728
<P>
     Re:  Agreement between Segway VIII Corp. and
          Gregg E. Jaclin
<P>
Dear Mr. Jaclin:
<P>
The following sets forth the agreement between Segway VIII
Corp. ("SEGWAY") and Gregg E, Jaclin ("JACLIN"):
<P>
     1.  JACLIN agrees to purchase 1,000,000 restricted
common shares of SEGWAY at the value of $.0001 per share for
a purchase price of $125.00.
<P>
     2.  Upon the receipt of $125.00, SEGWAY will tender the
shares from treasury to JACLIN.
<P>
     3.  JACLIN represents that he is a sophisticated
purchaser with the knowledge and understanding of the
securities industry in order to make well-informed
investment decisions.  In addition, JACLIN has been provided
with access to all documents of SEGWAY and has signed a
subscription agreement attached hereto and made a part
hereof.
<P>
     4.  Notice shall be given by certified mail, return
receipt requested, the date of notice being deemed the date
of postmarking.  Notices, unless either party has notified
the other party of an alternative address as provided
hereunder, shall be sent to the address set forth herein.
<P>
     5.  In the event that any term, covenant, condition, or
other provision contained herein is held to be invalid, void
or otherwise unenforceable by any court of competent
jurisdiction, the invalidity of any such term, covenant,
condition, provision or Agreement shall in no way affect any
other term, covenant, condition or provision or Agreement
contained herein, which shall remain in full force and
effect.
<P>
     6.  This Agreement contains all of the terms agreed
upon by the parties with respect to the subject matter
hereof.  This Agreement has been entered into after full
investigation.
<P>
     7.  This Agreement shall be construed in accordance
with and governed by the laws of the State of New Jersey
applicable to agreements made and to be performed within the
State of New Jersey without giving the effect to the
conflict of law principals thereof.
<P>
     8.  No amendments or additions to this Agreement shall
be binding unless in writing, signed by both parties, except
as herein otherwise provided.
<P>
     9.  Neither party may assign nor delegate any of its
rights or obligations hereunder without first obtaining the
written consent of the other party.
<P>
Very truly yours,
<P>
RICHARD I. ANSLOW & ASSOCIATES
<P>
By: /s/ Ross A. Goldstein
-------------------------------
     ROSS A. GOLDSTEIN
<P>
RAG/tp
<P>
ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO BY:     ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO BY:
<P>
SEGWAY VIII CORP.
<P>
By: /s/ Richard I. Anslow      By: /s/ Gregg E. Jaclin
--------------------------     ---------------------------
        RICHARD I. ANSLOW              GREGG E. JACLIN
        President
<P>
##### 



Exhibit 31.2 Certification Pursuant to Section 302
Of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  I, Kevin Shu, certify that:1.
    
    I have reviewed this Amendment No.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q/A of MetroCorp Bancshares, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and have:  a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known
to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andc)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):  a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting. Date: August 27, 2004 /s/ Kevin Shu
§ 152.26 Appeals procedures. ( a ) *General.* A PCIP shall establish and maintain procedures for individuals to appeal eligibility and coverage determinations.
( b ) *Minimum requirements.* The appeals procedure must, at a minimum, provide: ( 1 ) A potential enrollee with the right to a timely redetermination by the PCIP or its designee of a determination regarding PCIP eligibility, including a determination of whether the individual is a citizen or national of the United States, or is lawfully present in the United States.
( 2 ) An enrollee with the right to a timely redetermination by the PCIP or its designee of a determination regarding the coverage of a service or the amount paid by the PCIP for a service.
( 3 ) An enrollee with the right to a timely reconsideration of a redetermination made under paragraph (b)(2) of this section by an entity independent of the PCIP.
#### § 1158.405 Penalty procedures.

Agencies shall impose and collect civil penalties pursuant to the provisions of the Program Fraud and Civil Remedies Act, 31 U.S.C. sections 3803 (except subsection (c)), 3804, 3805, 3806, 3807, 3808, and 3812, insofar as these provisions are not inconsistent with the requirements herein.
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 229 (Wednesday, November 29, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 69137]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9458]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Health, Lung, and Blood Institute; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute 
Special Emphasis Panel; Childhood Asthma Follow-up Study.
    Date: November 28, 2006.
    Time: 10 a.m. to 1 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, 
Bethesda, MD 20892. (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Valerie L. Prenger, PhD, Health Scientist 
Administrator, Division of Extramural Affairs, National Heart, Lung, 
and Blood Institute, 6701 Rockledge Drive, MSC 7924, Room 7214, 
Bethesda, MD 20892-7924. (301) 435-0270. <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#146466717a73716662547a7c78767d3a7a7d7c3a737b62"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1a6a687f747d7f686c5a747276787334747372347d756c">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, 
National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and 
Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, 
Blood Diseases and Resource Research, National Institute of Health, 
HHS)

    Dated: November 21, 2006.
David Clary,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 06-9458 Filed 11-28-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### § 144.212 Confidentiality of information.

Data collected and reported under the requirements of this subpart are subject to the confidentiality of information requirements specified in regulations under 42 CFR part 401, subpart B, and 45 CFR part 5, subpart F.
Opinion filed May 23, 2013

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals __________

No. 11-13-00135-CR

__________

ERNEST ROCHA, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 104th District Court

Taylor County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 17889B

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The jury convicted Appellant, Ernest Rocha, of the offense of indecency 

with a child, found the enhancement allegation to be true, and assessed punishment 

at confinement for fifteen years. We dismiss the appeal. 

Appellant’s sentence was imposed on June 21, 2012. No motion for new 

trial was filed. Appellant’s pro se notice of appeal was filed on April 18, 2013, 
2

301 days after the date sentence was imposed. This court notified Appellant by 

letter dated April 25, 2013, that the notice of appeal appeared to be untimely. We 

requested that Appellant respond and show grounds for continuing this appeal. We 

also informed Appellant that the appeal may be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. 

In response to our letter, Appellant filed a motion in this court requesting an 

extension of time to file an out-of-time appeal. Pursuant to TEX. R.

APP. P. 26.2(a)(1), the notice of appeal must be filed within thirty days after the 

day sentence is imposed. In this case, the due date was July 23, 2012. For an 

extension, TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3 mandates that the notice of appeal and the motion 

for extension must be filed within fifteen days after the deadline for filing the 

notice of appeal. Neither the notice of appeal nor the motion for extension was

timely filed. Absent a timely filed notice of appeal or the granting of a timely 

motion for extension of time, we do not have jurisdiction to entertain the appeal. 

Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998); Olivo v. State, 918 

S.W.2d 519 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996); Rodarte v. State, 860 S.W.2d 108 (Tex. Crim. 

App. 1993). We have no jurisdiction to grant Appellant’s motion for extension. 

See Olivo, 918 S.W.2d 519.

Accordingly, Appellant’s motion for extension of time to file his notice of 

appeal is overruled, and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

May 23, 2013

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

McCall, J., and Willson, J.