alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of R&R Acquisition VIII, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007 as filed
      with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
      Arnold P. Kling, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to
      ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/
                Arnold P. KlingArnold
                P. KlingPrincipal
                Executive OfficerAugust
                16, 2007
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 115,603
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            (641)
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        (106,355)
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          (10)
<OTHER-SE>                                     (8,341)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 (115,603)
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (4,014)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (150)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (150)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### § 160.532 Collateral estoppel.

When a final determination that the respondent violated an administrative simplification provision has been rendered in any proceeding in which the respondent was a party and had an opportunity to be heard, the respondent is bound by that determination in any proceeding under this part.
§ 1158.500 Secretary of Defense. ( a ) The Secretary of Defense may exempt, on a case-by-case basis, a covered Federal action from the prohibition whenever the Secretary determines, in writing, that such an exemption is in the national interest. The Secretary shall transmit a copy of each such written exemption to Congress immediately after making such a determination.
( b ) The Department of Defense may issue supplemental regulations to implement paragraph (a) of this section.
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

__________________________________________

)

CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND )

ETHICS IN WASHINGTON, et al., )

) 

Plaintiffs, ) Civil Action No. 18-76 (RC)

)

v. )

)

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, )

)

Defendant. )

__________________________________________)

PLAINTIFFS’ NOTICE OF APPEAL 

Notice is given that plaintiffs in the above-captioned action, Citizens for Responsibility 

and Ethics in Washington and Noah Bookbinder, hereby appeal to the United States Court of 

Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit from the District Court’s March 29, 2019

memorandum opinion and final judgment granting the defendant Federal Election Commission’s 

motion for summary judgment and denying plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment. 

Dated: May 28, 2019

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Stuart McPhail

Stuart C. McPhail

smcphail@citizensforethics.org

(D.C. Bar No. 1032529)

Adam J. Rappaport

arappaport@citizensforethics.org

(D.C. Bar No. 479866)

Case 1:18-cv-00076-RC Document 24 Filed 05/28/19 Page 1 of 3
2

Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics

in Washington

1101 K Street, N.W., Suite 201

Washington, D.C. 20005

Telephone: (202) 408-5565

Fax: (202) 588-5020

Attorneys for Citizens for Responsibility and 

Ethics in Washington and Noah Bookbinder

Case 1:18-cv-00076-RC Document 24 Filed 05/28/19 Page 2 of 3
1

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that, on May 28, 2018, a true and correct copy of plaintiffs’ notice of 

appeal was filed and served electronically through the Court’s CM/ECF system upon the 

following counsel or record:

Kevin Deeley

Charles Kitcher

Haven G. Ward

Federal Election Commission

Office of General Counsel

1050 First Street NE

Washington, DC 20005

/s/ Stuart McPhail

Stuart McPhail

Case 1:18-cv-00076-RC Document 24 Filed 05/28/19 Page 3 of 3
Exhibit 10.1


 


SECOND AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


  


This Second Amendment to Employment Agreement
(the “Second Amendment”) is made the 6th day of August 2020 between ALLIED MOTION TECHNOLOGIES INC., a Colorado corporation
(the “Company”) and RICHARD S. WARZALA (“Employee”).


 


WHEREAS, the Company and Employee
are parties to an Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated as of March 22, 2016 (the “Employment Agreement”);


 


WHEREAS, the Company and Employee
are parties to a letter agreement dated December 22, 2008 which provides Employee with certain benefits if his employment terminates
after a Change in Control of the Company (the “CIC Agreement”);


 


WHEREAS, the Company and the
Employee amended the Employment Agreement and the CIC Agreement by Amendment to Employment Agreement and Change in Control Agreement
dated December 28, 2017;


 


WHEREAS, the Company and Employee desire to
further amend the Employment Agreement as provided in this Second Amendment; 


 


NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration,
the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as set forth below:


 


1.           
Any capitalized term not defined in this Amendment shall have the meaning set forth in the Employment Agreement.


 


2.           
Term. Section 2 of the Employment Agreement is amended to read in its entirety as follows:


 


2.       Term
of Employment. The term of this Agreement is effective for a period commencing December 28, 2017 and continuing through the
close of business on January 2, 2023 (the “Initial Period”), subject to earlier termination as provided in Section
4. The Initial Period will automatically be extended for one-year periods (each a “Renewal Period”) unless either party
shall have given the other party written notice of termination not less than 180 days prior to the end of the Initial Period or
any Renewal Period, as the case may be.


 


3.       Effect
on Existing Agreements. Any provision of the Employment Agreement not modified by this Amendment shall remain in full force
and effect.


 






     


     


    

 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the Company and Employee have executed this Second Amendment, which may be in separate counterparts, effective as of the date first
above written.


 


	 	Company:




 


	 	ALLIED MOTION TECHNOLOGIES INC.




 


	 	By:	/s/ Richard D. Federico
	 	Name:  	Richard D. Federico
	 	Title:	Chair of the Compensation Committee




 


	 	Employee:




 


	 	 	/s/ Richard S. Warzala
	 	Name:  	Richard S. Warzala
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Special Emphasis Panel; Clinical Trial Methods in Neurology.                    

*Date:*                         December 14, 2006.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 3 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate contract proposals.                    

*Place:*                         Westin Embassy Row, 2100 Massachusetts Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20008.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Phillip F. Wiethorn, Scientific Review Administrator, DHHS/NIH/NINDS/DER/SRB, 6001 Executive Boulevard; MSC 9529, Neuroscience Center; Room 3203, Bethesda, MD 20892-9529, (301) 496-5388.                         *wiethorp@ninds.nih.gov.*

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.853, Clinical Research Related to Neurological Disorders; 93.854, Biological Basis Research in the Neurosciences, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: November 28, 2006.

Anna Snouffer,

Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 06-9528 Filed 12-4-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
```

[House Report 106-874]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

106th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 2d Session                                                     106-874

======================================================================

 
WAIVING POINTS OF ORDER AGAINST THE CONFERENCE REPORT TO ACCOMPANY H.R. 
               4919, THE SECURITY ASSISTANCE ACT OF 2000

                                _______
                                

 September 20, 2000.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

                                _______
                                

 Mr. Diaz-Balart, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 584]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 584, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

                summary of provisions of the resolution

    The resolution waives all points of order against the 
conference report to accompany H.R. 4919, the Security 
Assistance Act of 2000, and against its consideration. The rule 
further provides that the conference report shall be considered 
as read.

                                  

```
Merrimack,

No. 5581.

#### In re Matheisel’s Appeal.

Submitted December 9, 1966.

Decided December 20, 1966.

*Rudolph A. Matheisel,*pro se.

Per curiam.

It is a well-established principle of law that a court lacks power to hear or determine a case concerning subject matters over which it has no jurisdiction. *Pokigo*v. *International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers,*106 N. H. 384, 385; *Beausoleil*v. *United Furniture Workers,*107 N. H. 437. furthermore a court has the power to examine and determine on its own motion whether it has jurisdiction of a matter presented to it. 20 Am. Jur. 2d, Courts, *s.*92, *p.*453.

The documents presented by the plaintiff apparently relate mainly to grievances arising out of matters pertaining to the armed forces of the United States and related services which are within the exclusive jurisdiction of the federal government. U. S. Const., *Art.*1, *s.*8; *Art.*II, *s.*1; *Art.*III, *ss.*1, 2. The Superior Court lacked jurisdiction over the subject matter of plaintiff’s complaints and could not properly entertain them. *Pokigo*v. *International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, supra.*Furthermore the Court lacked jurisdiction over most of the numerous parties, several of whom were federal officials, against whom plaintiff sought relief. See *Duncan*v. *McDonough,*105 N. H. 308.

*480We hold that the Presiding Justice properly refused to entertain these actions and that the clerk acting on behalf of the Court properly returned plaintiff’s documents.

*Appeals dismissed.*

MEMORANDUM.

Mr. Justice Blandin, having attained the age of seventy years on December 20, 1966, retired under the constitutional limitation.

On December 12, 1966, Mr. William A. Grimes, Associate-Justice of the Superior Court, was appointed an Associate Justice of this court, his term beginning December 21, 1966.
§ 155.630 Reporting. *Requirement to provide information related to tax administration.* If the Exchange grants an individual a certificate of exemption in accordance with § 155.610(i), the Exchange must transmit to the IRS at such time and in such manner as the IRS may specify— ( a ) The individual's name, Social Security number, and exemption certificate number;
( b ) Any other information required in guidance published by the Secretary of the Treasury in accordance with 26 CFR 601.601(d)(2).
•

•

Released 12/13/85

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

WASHING10N. DC 2(M6J

A8S-8

REPORT OF THE AUDIT DIVISION

ON

DRAFT AUGUSTINE FOR CONGRESS

AND

AUGUSTINE FOR CONGRESS

I. Background

A. Overview

This report is based on an audit of Draft Augustine for

Congress ("the Draft Account") and Augustine for Congress ("the

Committee"), undertaken by the Audit Division of the Federal

Election Commission in accordance with the provisions of the

Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended ("the Act").

The audit was conducted pursuant to 2 U.S.C. S 438(b) which

states, in part, that the Commission may conduct audits and field

investigations of any political committee required to file a

report under Section 434 of this title. Prior to conducting any audit under this section, the Commission shall perform an

internal review of reports filed by selected committ,es to

determine if the reports filed by a particular committee meet the

threshold requirements for substantial compliance with the Act.

The Draft Account and the Committee registered with the

Clerk of the House of Representatives on May 15, 1984 and July 2,

1984, respectively. Both committees maintain headquarters in New

Orleans, Louisiana. The audit covered the period May 10, 1984

through December 31, 1984, the closing date for the latest report that would have been filed at the time the audit was conducted.

The Draft Account reported a beginning cash balance on May 10,

1984 of $-0-, total receipts of $4,840.00; total disbursements of

$4,503.94; and a closing cash balance on June 19, 1984 of

$336.06. The Committee reported a beginning cash balance on June

19, 1984 of $-0-, total receipts of $90,173.00, total

disbursements of $811 867.23, and a closing cash balance on

October lS, 1984 of ~8,306.00. 1/

This report is based on documents and workpapers which sup~~rt each of its factual statements. They form part of the

record upon which the Commission based its decisions on the

matters in the report and were available to the Commissioners and

appropriate staff for review.

To_date, the Committee has not filed a report covering the

period October 16, 1984 through December 31, 1984. The

reported totals do not calculate correctly due to

mathematical errors.
• B. Key Personnel

2

•

The Treasurer of the committees during the period

covered by the audit was Mr. Leon Fulton.

c. Scope

The audit included such tests as verification of total

reported receipts and disbursements and individual transactionsJ

review of required supporting documentationJ analysis of

Committee debts and obligationsJ and such other audit procedures

as deemed necessary under the circumstances except that the

receipt records were not maintained in a manner which allowed

testing by the auditors for correct aggregate contribution

totals, proper itemization, and contribution limitations.

II. Finding and Recommendation

A. Matters Referred to the Office of General Counsel

Certain matters noted during the audit were referred to

the Office of General Counsel•

"')

•
§ 164.414 Administrative requirements and burden of proof. ( a ) *Administrative requirements.* A covered entity is required to comply with the administrative requirements of § 164.530(b), (d), (e), (g), (h), (i), and (j) with respect to the requirements of this subpart.
( b ) *Burden of proof.* In the event of a use or disclosure in violation of subpart E, the covered entity or business associate, as applicable, shall have the burden of demonstrating that all notifications were made as required by this subpart or that the use or disclosure did not constitute a breach, as defined at § 164.402.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 45 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 45

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
     relating to contributions and expenditures intended to affect 
                               elections.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 14, 2023

   Mrs. Shaheen (for herself, Ms. Cortez Masto, Mr. Markey, Mr. Van 
  Hollen, Mr. Carper, Mrs. Gillibrand, Mr. Blumenthal, Mr. Welch, Ms. 
Baldwin, Mr. Warnock, Ms. Hassan, Mr. Lujan, Mr. Merkley, Mr. Menendez, 
  Ms. Smith, Mr. Padilla, Mr. Kaine, Ms. Klobuchar, Mrs. Murray, Mr. 
Whitehouse, Mr. Sanders, Mr. Wyden, Mr. King, Ms. Hirono, Mr. Heinrich, 
     Mr. Peters, Mr. Coons, Ms. Warren, Mr. Casey, Mr. Durbin, Ms. 
 Duckworth, and Mr. Schatz) introduced the following joint resolution; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
     relating to contributions and expenditures intended to affect 
                               elections.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. To advance democratic self-government and political 
equality, and to protect the integrity of government and the electoral 
process, Congress and the States may regulate and set reasonable limits 
on the raising and spending of money by candidates and others to 
influence elections.
    ``Section 2. Congress and the States shall have power to implement 
and enforce this article by appropriate legislation, and may 
distinguish between natural persons and corporations or other 
artificial entities created by law, including by prohibiting such 
entities from spending money to influence elections.
    ``Section 3. Nothing in this article shall be construed to grant 
Congress or the States the power to abridge the freedom of the 
press.''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 1174.38 Appeal to the authority head. ( a ) A defendant has no right to appear personally, or through a representative, before the authority head.
( b ) There is no right to appeal any interlocutory ruling.
( c ) The authority head will not consider any objection or evidence that was not raised before the ALJ unless the defendant demonstrates that extraordinary circumstances excuse the failure to object. If the defendant demonstrates to the authority head's satisfaction that extraordinary circumstances prevented the presentation of evidence at the hearing, and that the additional evidence is material, the authority head may remand the matter to the ALJ for consideration of the additional evidence.
( d ) The authority head may affirm, reduce, reverse, compromise, remand, or settle any penalty or assessment that the ALJ imposed in the initial decision or reconsideration decision.
( e ) The authority head will promptly serve each party to the appeal and the ALJ with a copy of the decision. This decision must contain a statement describing the right of any person, against whom a penalty or assessment has been made, to seek judicial review.