alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 1326.103 Discovery.

The Department and any party named in the notice issued pursuant to § 1326.90 has the right to conduct discovery (including depositions) against opposing parties as provided by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. There is no fixed rule on priority of discovery. Upon written motion, the presiding officer must promptly rule upon any objection to discovery action. The presiding officer also has the power to grant a protective order or relief to any party against whom discovery is sought and to restrict or control discovery so as to prevent undue delay in the conduct of the hearing. Upon the failure of any party to make discovery, the presiding officer may issue any order and impose any sanction other than contempt orders authorized by Rule 37 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

[80 FR 44807, July 27, 2015, as amended at 85 FR 72911, Nov. 16, 2020]
#### Spooner v. Lefevre, appellant.

*Reference—findings of fact by referee*— *items of account.*

In an action where the parties had mutual claims against each other on account, the referee made a general finding in favor of the plaintiff, but gave no items of account. *Held,*that the referee should have required the parties to present their accounts in the form of debtor and creditor, and should, in his findings, have stated the items allowed distinctly. *Ketchum*v. *Olark,*32 Barb. 319 ; Code, § 272.

Every judgment rendered by a referee should rest upon facts warranting it. distinctly and explicitly found and stated. *Buckingham*v. *Payne,*36 Barb. 81; *Armstrong*v. *Bricknell,*2 Bans. 221; *Smith,*v. *Denier,*23 N. T. 365.

Appeal from, a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, entered upon the report of a referee.

*John T.*Pingree, for appellant.

*II. V. Hoioland,*for respondent.

E. Darwin Smith, J.

The opinion is mainly devoted to a consideration of the evidence. The head-note contains the only points- of importance passed upon, and it is not believed necessary to give the opinion in full.

*New trial granted.*
§ 155.1328 Periodic evaluation requirements. ( a ) The Secretary and the Secretary of the Treasury, as applicable, shall periodically evaluate the implementation of a program under a section 1332 waiver consistent with § 155.1308(f)(3)(iv) and any terms and conditions governing the section 1332 waiver.
( b ) Each periodic evaluation must include a review of the annual report or reports submitted by the State in accordance with § 155.1324 that relate to the period of time covered by the evaluation.
[77 FR 11718, Feb. 27, 2012, as amended at 86 FR 53505, Sept. 27, 2021]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001068148
<NAME> PARK-OHIO INDUSTRIES INC./OH
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           1,901
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  116,080
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,805
<INVENTORY>                                    183,706
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               310,959
<PP&E>                                         213,670
<DEPRECIATION>                                  82,174
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 631,244
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          122,943
<BONDS>                                        327,708
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     151,280
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   631,244
<SALES>                                        536,407
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               536,407
<CGS>                                          440,082
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  440,082
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,729
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 22,431
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,581
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             12,850
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,850
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 226 (Friday, November 24, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67950-67951]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9365]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Seventh Meeting: RTCA Special Committee 206/EUROCAE WG 44/53 
Plenary: Aeronautical Information Services Data Link

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice RTCA Special Committee 206 meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a 
meeting of RTCA Special Committee 206: Aeronautical Information 
Services Data Link.

DATES: The meeting will be held December 4-8, 2006, from 9 a.m. to 5 
p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at Sofitel Hotel, 84 allees Jean 
Jaures, 31000 Toulouse, France.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: (1) RTCA Secretariat, 1828 L Street, 
NW., Suite 805, Washington, DC, 20036-5133; telephone (202) 833-9339; 
fax (202) 833-9434; Web site http://www.rtca.org; (2) Hosted by Airbus 
and Thales; Onsite Contact: telephone (+33)5/61102310; fax (+33)5/
61102320; e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#490178797078641b0c09282a2a263b672a2624"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e4acd5d4ddd5c9b6a1a48587878b96ca878b89">[email protected]</span></a>; Web site http://www.sofitel.com/sofitel/fichehotel/fr/sof/1091/fiche hotel.shtml.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice 
is hereby given for a Special Committee 206 meeting. The agenda will 
include:

<bullet> December 4:
    <bullet> Opening Session (Chairman's Remarks and Introductions, 
Review and Approve Meeting Agenda and Minutes, Discussion, Action Item 
Review, Presentations)

[[Page 67951]]

    <bullet> Presentations: Pending
    <bullet> Breakout meetings of Subgroup 1 and Subgroup 2
<bullet> December 5:
    <bullet> Subgroup 1 and Subgroup 2 Meetings
<bullet> December 7:
    <bullet> Subgroup 1 and Subgroup 2 Meetings
<bullet> December 8:
    <bullet> Subgroup 1 and Subgroup 2 Meetings
    <bullet> Closing Session (Other Business, Date and Place of Next 
Meeting, Closing Remarks, Adjourn)

    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairmen, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Dated: Issued in Washington, DC on November 7, 2006.
Francisco Estrada C.,
RTCA Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 06-9365 Filed 11-22-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
§ 155.1316 Federal public notice and approval process. ( a ) *General.* The Federal public notice and approval process begins on the first business day after the Secretary and the Secretary of the Treasury, as applicable, determine that all elements for a complete application were documented and submitted to the Secretary.
( b ) *Public notice and comment period.* ( 1 ) Following a determination that a State's application for a section 1332 waiver is complete, the Secretary and the Secretary of the Treasury, as applicable, will provide for a public notice and comment period that is sufficient to ensure a meaningful level of public input and that does not impose requirements that are in addition to, or duplicative of, requirements imposed under the Administrative Procedures Act, or requirements that are unreasonable or unnecessarily burdensome with respect to State compliance.
( 2 ) At the beginning of the Federal notice and comment period, the Secretary will make available through its Web site and otherwise, and shall update as appropriate, public notice that includes all of the following: ( i ) The complete application for a section 1332 waiver, updates for the status of the State's application, and any supplemental materials received from the State prior to and during the Federal public notice and comment period.
( ii ) Information relating to where copies of the application for a section 1332 waiver are available for public review and comment.
( iii ) Information relating to how and where written comments may be submitted and reviewed by the public, and the timeframe during which comments will be accepted.
( iv ) Any public comments received during the Federal public notice and comment period.
( c ) *Approval of a section 1332 waiver application.* The final decision of the Secretary and the Secretary of the Treasury, as applicable, on a State application for a section 1332 waiver will be issued by the Secretary no later than 180 days after the determination by the Secretary and the Secretary of the Treasury, as applicable, that a complete application was received in accordance with § 155.1308.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-4142
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus AMEER G. MIKHAIL, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CR-94- 407-MJG) Submitted: August 28, 1997 Decided: September 12, 1997 Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ameer G. Mikhail, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew George Warrens Norman, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant filed an untimely notice of appeal. We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. The time periods for filing notices of appeal are governed by Fed. R. App. P. 4. These periods are "mandatory and jurisdictional." Browder v. Director, Dep't of Corrections , 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson , 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). Parties to criminal actions have ten days withinwhich to file in the district court notices of appeal from judgments or final orders. Fed. R. App. P. 4(b). The only exception to the appeal period is when the district court extends the time to appeal on a showing of excusable neglect. See id. The district court entered its order on January 16, 1997; Appellant's notice of appeal was filed on February 10, 1997, which is beyond the ten-day appeal period. Appellant's failure to note a timely appeal or obtain an extension of the appeal period leavesthis court without jurisdiction to consider the merits of Appellant's appeal. We therefore dismiss the appeal. We dispense withoral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### § 1169.1 Purpose and scope.

The regulations in this part set forth NEH's procedures under the Privacy Act, as required by 5 U.S.C. 552a(f), with respect to systems of records maintained by NEH. These regulations establish procedures by which an individual may exercise the rights granted by the Privacy Act to determine whether an NEH system of records contains a record pertaining to him or her; gain access to such records; and request correction or amendment of such records. The regulations also set identification requirements; establish procedures by which an individual may appeal within NEH an adverse agency determination; prescribe fees which NEH will charge for copying records; and establish exemptions from certain requirements of the Privacy Act for certain NEH systems of records or parts thereof.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 12-3977

___________________________

Yussuf Hamid

lllllllllllllllllllll Appellant

v.

JPMorgan Chase Bank,NationalAssociation; Shapiro & Zielke,LLP;JohnDoes I-XX

lllllllllllllllllllll Appellees

____________

 Appeal from United States District Court 

for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis

____________

 Submitted: April 30, 2013

Filed: May 3, 2013

[Unpublished]

____________

Before BYE, ARNOLD, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

In this civil action challenging the foreclosure of his home, Yussuf Hamid

appeals after the district court dismissed his claims. Upon careful review of the

1

The Honorable Richard H. Kyle, United States District Judge for the District 1

of Minnesota.
issues properly raised on appeal, we find no basis for reversal. See Butler v. Bank of

America, N.A., 690 F.3d 959, 962 (8th Cir. 2012) (rejecting theory that holder of

mortgage must also hold note in order to foreclose); see also Ashcroft v. Iqbal,

556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (courts are not bound to accept as true legal conclusions

couched asfactual allegations); Hill v. City of Pine Bluff, Ark., 696 F.3d 709, 712 n.2

(8th Cir. 2012) (claims not argued on appeal are deemed abandoned); Rotskoff v.

Cooley, 438 F.3d 852, 854 (8th Cir. 2006) (appellant waives challenge to district

court’s ruling by failing to develop issue in brief as required by rules of appellate

procedure); Stone v. Harry, 364 F.3d 912, 914 (8th Cir. 2004) (claims not presented

in district court may not be advanced for first time on appeal). 

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

-2-
**Exhibit
        32.2**
  **Certification
        of Principal Financial Officer**
 **Pursuant
        to**
 **Section
        906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)**
  In
        connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30,
        2008
        (the “Report”) of Tailwind Financial Inc. (the “Registrant”), as filed with the
        Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, John Anderson,
        Chief
        Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my
        knowledge, that:
  (1)
        The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
  (2)
        The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the
        Registrant.
  Date:
                    September 15, 2008
                /s/
                    John AndersonName:
                    John AndersonTitle:
                    Chief Financial Officer(principal
                    financial officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 29 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. CON. RES. 29

       Providing for a correction in the enrollment of H.R. 815.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            February 13 (legislative day, February 12), 2024

 Mrs. Murray submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
                        considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
       Providing for a correction in the enrollment of H.R. 815.

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That, in the enrollment of H.R. 815, the Clerk of the House of 
Representatives shall amend the title so as to read: ``Making emergency 
supplemental appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 
2024, and for other purposes.''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 158.251 Notice of MLR information. ( a ) *Notice of MLR information when the MLR standard is met or exceeded* — ( 1 ) *General requirement.* Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, for the 2011 MLR reporting year, an issuer whose MLR meets or exceeds the applicable MLR standard required by § 158.210 or § 158.211 must provide each policyholder and subscriber of a group health plan, and each subscriber in the individual market, a notice in accordance with the requirements of this section.
( 2 ) *Timing.* An issuer must provide the notice required in this paragraph (a) with the first plan document that the issuer provides to enrollees on or after July 1, 2012.
( 3 ) *Form and appearance.* The notice must be prominently displayed in clear, conspicuous 14-point bold type on the front of the plan document or as a separate notice. The notice may be provided electronically, if the requirements for electronic disclosure under section 2715 of the Public Health Service Act are met.
( 4 ) *Language.* The following language must be used to satisfy the notice requirement of this paragraph (a): *Medical Loss Ratio Information* —The Affordable Care Act requires health insurers in the individual and small group markets to spend at least 80 percent of the premiums they receive on health care services and activities to improve health care quality (in the large group market, this amount is 85 percent). This is referred to as the Medical Loss Ratio (MLR) rule or the 80/20 rule. If a health insurer does not spend at least 80 percent of the premiums it receives on health care services and activities to improve health care quality, the insurer must rebate the difference. A health insurer's Medical Loss Ratio is determined separately for each State's individual, small group and large group markets in which the health insurer offers health insurance. In some States, health insurers must meet a higher or lower Medical Loss Ratio. No later than August 1, 2012, health insurers must send any rebates due for 2011 and information to employers and individuals regarding any rebates due for 2011. You are receiving this notice because your health insurer had a Medical Loss Ratio for 2011 that met or exceeded the required Medical Loss Ratio. For more information on Medical Loss Ratio and your health insurer's Medical Loss Ratio, visit *www.HealthCare.gov .*”
( b ) *Exceptions.* The requirements of paragraph (a) of this section do not apply to an issuer that reports its experience separately under § 158.120(d)(3) or (d)(4), or to an issuer whose experience is non-credible as defined in § 158.230(c)(3) and determined in accordance with § 158.231.
[77 FR 28797, May 16, 2012]
Exhibit 33.2
                                  ------------



          ASSERTION OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SERVICING CRITERIA



The Bank of New York and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N. A.
(collectively, the "Company") provides this platform-level assessment of
compliance with the servicing criteria specified in Item 1122(d) of Regulation
AB promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Management has determined that the following servicing criteria are applicable
in regards to the following servicing platform for the following period:

Platform: Publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting initially
required under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) residential
mortgage-backed securities and other mortgage-related asset-backed securities
issued on or after January 1, 2006 (and like-kind transactions issued prior to
January 1, 2006) for which the Company provides trustee, securities
administration, paying agent or custodial services. The platform includes like
kind transactions for which the Company provided trustee, securities
administrator, paying agent or custodial services as a result of the Company's
acquisition as of October 1, 2006 of portions of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.'s
corporate trust business, including structured finance agency and trust
transactions.

Applicable Servicing Criteria: All servicing criteria set forth in Item
1122(d), to the extent required by the related transaction agreements as to
any transaction, except for the following criteria: 1122 (d) (1)(ii), (iii),
(iv), (4) (iv), (v), (vi), (vii), (viii), (ix), (x), (xi), (xii) and (xiii).

Period: Twelve months ended December 31, 2006.

With respect to the Platform and the Period, the Company provides the
following assessment of compliance in respect of the Applicable Servicing
Criteria:

o  The Company is responsible for assessing its compliance with the Applicable
Servicing Criteria.

o  The Company has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

o  As of December 31, 2006 and for the Period, the Company was in material
compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.



                                      1
<PAGE>


Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has
issued an attestation report with respect to the Company's foregoing
assessment of compliance.



      The Bank of New York                    The Bank of New York
      The Bank of New York Trust              The Bank of New York Trust
         Company, N.A.                           Company, N.A.


      /s/ Robert L. Griffin                   /s/ Patrick J. Tadie
      ---------------------------             ---------------------------
      Robert L. Griffin                       Patrick J. Tadie
      Authorized Signer                       Authorized Signer


March 1, 2007



                                      2