National Water Program G

FY 05 End-of-Year Repor

Final Measures and Comm

Office of Water

U.S. Environmental Protection Agenc

As of May 2006
Table of Contents

FY 2005 Subobjectives with Program Activity Measures and FY 

1) Water Safe to Drink 2) Fish and Shellfish Safe to Eat 3) Water Safe for Swimming 4) Restore and Improve Water Quality on a Watershed B5) Protect Coastal and Ocean Waters 6) Apply the Best Available Science 7) Protect Wetlands 8) Protect Mexico Border Water 9) Protect the Great Lakes 10) Protect the Chesapeake Bay 11) Protect the Gulf of Mexico 
Water Safe to Drink

Measure Description: Percent of the population served by communireceive drinking water that meets all applicable health-based drinkingeffective treatment and source water protection.

National Program Manager Comments:

Reg 1 Reg 2 Reg 3 Reg 4 Reg 5 Reg 6 Reg 7 Reg 8 

2002 Baseline 88% 81% 98% 96% 94% 93% 95% 97% 2005 Commitment 71.0% 80.0% 93.0% 93.0% 95.0% 93.0% 94.0% 94.0% 2005 Midyear 93.0% 80.3% 85.0% 93.0% 96.0% 92.0% 92.0% 92.0% 2005 End-of-Year 92.50% 55.30% 93.20% 93% 94.10% 87.80% 91.20% 94.70Universe 

Subobjective 2.1.1 National 

Target measureFY 05 End-of-Year data is taken from SDWIS.
Measure Description: Percent of the population served by communireceives drinking water that meets health-based standards for those resystems need to comply as of December 2001.

National Program Manager Comments:

Reg 1 Reg 2 Reg 3 Reg 4 Reg 5 Reg 6 Reg 7 Reg 8 

2002 Baseline 88% 81% 98% 96% 94% 93% 95% 97% 2005 Commitment 78% 80% 94% 94% 95% 94% 94% 95% 2005 Midyear 93.7% 86.2% 92.0% 95.0% 95.8% 96.0% 93.0% 92.5% 2005 End-of-Year 93.2% 61.8% 94.6% 94.9% 94.8% 94.4% 93.9% 95.7% Universe 

Strategic Target: A National 

Water Safe to Drink

Target measureFY 05 End-of-Year data is taken from SDWIS.
Water Safe to Drink

Measure Description: Percent of the population served by communireceives drinking water that meets health-based standards with a com2002 or later.

National Program Manager Comments:

Reg 1 Reg 2 Reg 3 Reg 4 Reg 5 Reg 6 Reg 7 Reg 

2002 Baseline 

2005 Commitment 75% 70% 75% 75% 80% 75% 80% 752005 Midyear 99.3% 84.2% 93.0% 98.0% 99.8% 96.0% 99.0% 992005 End-of-Year 98.7% 84.4% 98.4% 97.9% 99.2% 92.9% 97.0% 99Universe 

Strategic Target: B National 

Target measureFY 05 End-of-Year data is taken from SDWIS.
Water Safe to Drink

Measure Description: Percentage of community water systems that meets health-based standards with which systems need to comply as 

National Program Manager Comments:

Reg 1 Reg 2 Reg 3 Reg 4 Reg 5 Reg 6 Reg 7 Reg 

2002 Baseline 

2005 Commitment n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2005 Midyear2005 End-of-Year 86.9% 88.2% 94.2% 93.8% 93.3% 92.6% 89.6% 92Universe 

Strategic Target: C National 

Target measureFY 05 End-of-Year data is taken from SDWIS.
Water Safe to Drink

Measure Description: Percentage of community water systems that meets health0based standards with a compliance date of January 200

National Program Manager Comments:

Reg 1 Reg 2 Reg 3 Reg 4 Reg 5 Reg 6 Reg 7 Reg 8 

2002 Baseline 

2005 Commitment n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2005 Midyear2005 End-of-Year 98.5% 97.4% 97.4% 97.0% 98.6% 93.1% 97.0% 98.0% Universe

Strategic Target: D National 

Target measureFY 05 End-of-Year data is taken from SDWIS.
Water Safe to Drink

Measure Description: Percent of the population served by communcountry that receive drinking water that meets all applicable health-bstandards.

National Program Manager Comments:

Reg 1 Reg 2 Reg 3 Reg 4 Reg 5 Reg 6 Reg 7 Reg 8 

2002 Baseline2005 Commitment n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 

2005 Midyear2005 End-of-Year 100.0% 100.0% n/a 100.0% 99.5% 90.4% 86.5% 82.6% Universe 

Strategic Target: E National 

Target measureFY 05 End-of-Year data is taken from SDWIS.
Water Safe to Drink

Measure Description: Percent of source water areas for community minimized risk to public health.

National Program Manager Comments:

Reg 1 Reg 2 Reg 3 Reg 4 Reg 5 Reg 6 Reg 7 Reg 8 

2002 Baseline 18% 4% 6% 2% 12% 2% 3% 15% 2005 Commitment n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 

2005 Midyear2005 End-of-Year 51.0% 30.0% 12.0% 21.0% 19.0% 19.0% 13.0% 20.0% Universe 

Strategic Target: F National 

Target measure
Water Safe to Drink

Measure Description: Number of households on Tribal lands lackinwater.

2015 Targ

National Program Manager Comments:

Strategic Target: G National 

National Commitment

2002 Baseline 39,0002005 Commitment n/a2005 Midyear n/a2005 End-of-Year 35,400Universe

Target measure
Water Safe to Drink

Measure #: 1 National OMeasure Description: Promulgate final Total Coliform/Distribution Systems Rule.Measure #: 2 National O

Measure Description: Conduct analysis to support determinations whether to regulate c

Consolidated List 2.Measure #: 3 National O

Measure Description: Each year, conduct analysis of currently regulated contaminants 

revise existing regulations within and outside the 6-year review cycle.

National Commitment

2002 Baseline n/a2005 Commitment n/a2005 Midyear No2005 End-of-Year NoUniverse

National Commitment

2002 Baseline n/a2005 Commitment n/a2005 Midyear No2005 End-of-Year NoUniverse

2002 2005 2005 2005 Univ

12 

2008 Target: Final rule 2008 Target: By 2006
Measure Description: Federal return on investment [cumulative dodisbursements to systems divided by cumulative Federal outlays for pDrinking Water Safe Revolving Fund (DWSRF).

National Program Manager Comments:

Reg 1 Reg 2 Reg 3 Reg 4 Reg 5 Reg 6 Reg 7 Reg 8 

2002 Baseline 152% 290% 138% 134% 142% 143% 179% 1692005 Commitment 

2005 Midyear2005 End-of-Year 170.3 229 153.1 142.5 1.65 138.6 208.7 164Universe 

Measure #: 4 National O

Indicator measure

Water Safe to Drink
Measure Description: Fund utilization rate [cumulative dollar amoudivided by cumulative funds available for projects] for the DWSRF.

National Program Manager Comments:

Reg 1 Reg 2 Reg 3 Reg 4 Reg 5 Reg 6 Reg 7 Re

2002 Baseline 72% 90% 91% 78% 72% 61% 76% 2005 Commitment 78% 88% 79% 80% 82% 74.5% 86% 2005 Midyear 72.0% 88.0% 91.0% 87.9% 75.0% 74.5% 100.0% 2005 End-of-Year 78.5% 93.0% 83.3% 88.0% 87.0% 64.5% 91.0% Universe

Measure #: 5 National O

Target measure

Water Safe to Drink
Measure Description: Number of DWSRF projects that have initiate

National Program Manager Comments:

Reg 1 Reg 2 Reg 3 Reg 4 Reg 5 Reg 6 Reg 7 Re

2003 Baseline 204 245 56 242 350 25 131 2005 Commitment 2005 Midyear 268 276 206 324 437 46 n/a 2005 End-of-Year 320 311 261 369 557 59 229 Universe 

Measure #: 6 National O

Indicator measure

Water Safe to Drink
Measure Description: The percentage of DWSRF loan agreements return Community Water Systems to compliance.

National Program Manager Comments:

Reg 1 Reg 2 Reg 3 Reg 4 Reg 5 Reg 6 Reg 7 Re

2002 Baseline 12% 61% 56% 19% 13% 54% 23% 2005 Commitment 2005 Midyear 12% 54% 59.5% 0% 0% 0% n/a 2005 End-of-Year 25.4% 65.0% 19.1% 32.0% 39.0% 53.7% 9.3% 1Universe 

Measure #: 7 National O

Indicator measure

Water Safe to Drink
Measure Description: Each year, all States will be in compliance wsanitary surveys at community water systems once every three years, audits of a random selection of water systems.

National Program Manager Comments:

Reg 1 Reg 2 Reg 3 Reg 4 Reg 5 Reg 6 Reg 7 Reg 

2002 Baseline n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2005 Commitment (83%)5 (100%)3 (80%)4 (83%)7 (83%)5 (100%)5 (100%)4 (12005 Midyear 4 3 0 5 5 1 2005 End-of-Year 5 3 5 8 5 5 4 Universe 6 3 5 8 6 5 4 

Target Measure; fixed annual target 100% of States

Measure #: 8 National O

Water Safe to Drink
Measure Description: Each year, all Tribal community water systemsanitary survey within the past 3 years.

National Program Manager Comments:

Reg 1 Reg 2 Reg 3 Reg 4 Reg 5 Reg 6 Reg 7 Re

2002 Baseline n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2005 Commitment n/a 100% n/a 100% 100% 100% 100% 2005 Midyear n/a 1 n/a 1 1 1 1 2005 End-of-Year n/a 1 n/a 1 2 1 1 Universe 0 1 0 1 2 1 1 

Target measure; annual target is 100% of TribesHeadquarters is working with Region 8 to increase the number of tribal sanitary surv

The universe for tribal community water systems includes the Navajo Nation.

Measure #: 9 National O

Water Safe to Drink
Measure Description: Percentage of source water areas for commusource water protection strategies in place (cumulative.)

National Program Manager Comments:

Reg 1 Reg 2 Reg 3 Reg 4 Reg 5 Reg 6 Reg 7 Re

2002 Baseline 18% 4% 6% 2% 12% 2% 3% 2005 Commitment 

2005 Midyear 2005 End-of-Year 90% 16% 25% 31% 56% 28% 24% Universe (CWS) 2,695 4,015 4,747 9,576 7,570 8,230 4,127 

Measure #: 10 National O

Indicator measureThe universe is community water systems (taken from SDWIS 2003 Inventory daareas.”

Water Safe to Drink
Measure Description: Percentage of source water areas for commuimplemented some aspects of source water protection strategies (cum

National Program Manager Comments:

Reg 1 Reg 2 Reg 3 Reg 4 Reg 5 Reg 6 Reg 7 Re

2002 Baseline2005 Commitment 

2005 Midyear 2005 End-of-Year 90.0% 15.0% 25.0% 31.0% 56.0% 18.5% 24.0% 4Universe (CWS) 2,695 4,015 4,747 9,576 7,570 8,230 4,127 3

Measure #: 11 National O

Indicator measureThe universe is community water systems (taken from SDWIS 2003 Inventory dawater areas.”

Water Safe to Drink
Measure Description: Number of Tribal water systems that have coassessment consistent with national guidelines.

Reg 1 Reg 2 Reg 3 Reg 4 Reg 5 Reg 6 Reg 7 Re

2004 Baseline 2005 Commitment 2005 Midyear 2005 End-of-Year 2 3 n/a 14 76 75 1 Universe 5 8 0 14 80 45 9 Navajo Nation Total Universe 

National Program Manager Comments:

Measure #: 12 National O

Indicator measure

The universe of tribal community water systems for this measure is taken from FY20

Water Safe to Drink
Measure Description: Percentage of community water systems with high, moderate, or low for risk susceptibility.

Reg 1 Reg 2 Reg 3 Reg 4 Reg 5 Reg 6 Reg 7 Re

2002 Baseline 2005 Commitment 2005 Midyear (high) 2005 Midyear (mod) 2005 Midyear (low) 2005 EOY (high) 2005 EOY (mod) 2005 EOY (low) Universe 2,695 4,015 4,747 9,576 7,570 8,230 4,127 

National Program Manager Comments:

Measure #: 13 (a,b,c) National O

Indicator measureThe universe of community water systems is taken from SDWIS 2003 Inventory dat

Sixteen states have reported data for this measure.

Water Safe to Drink
Measure Description: Percentage of community water systems for water areas will be available in a GIS digitized format using agreed uprotocols.

National Program Manager Comments:

Reg 1 Reg 2 Reg 3 Reg 4 Reg 5 Reg 6 Reg 7 Re

2004 Baseline 2005 Commitment 2005 Midyear 2005 End-of-Year 100% 100% 22% 100% 100% 100% 100% Universe 2,695 4,015 4,747 9,576 7,570 8,230 4,127 

Measure #: 14 National O

Indicator measure

Water Safe to Drink
Measure Description: Each year, identify at the State level the most categories of existing/potential sources of contamination for surface community water systems.

National Program Manager Comments:

Reg 1 Reg 2 Reg 3 Reg 4 Reg 5 Reg 6 Reg 7 Re

2002 Baseline 

2005 Commitment 2005 Midyear 2005 End-of-Year 83% 100% 100% 75% 83% 100% 100% Universe 6 3 5 8 6 5 4 

Measure #: 15 National O

Indicator measure

Water Safe to Drink
2008 Target: 100%

Measure #: 16 National O

National Commitment

2002 Baseline 77%2005 Commitment 90%2005 Midyear2005 End-of-Year 0%Universe 31(100%)

Measure Description: Percentage of the 31 pesticides identified in 2002 as having a higpotential will be reassessed by the Office of Pesticide Programs and appropriate additionrevised label restrictions, limited use in sensitive areas, additional monitoring) will be im

Measure #: 21 National OMeasure Description: Identify waters used by community water systems as a source of 

States/Tribes, have wherever attainable, adopted water quality standards with public wat

or for which States/Tribes have adopted water quality standards that provide an equivaleprotection. (Note: “An equivalent level of human health protection” refers to the MCL, health criterion water plus organism value.)

2002 Baseline 2005 Commitme2005 Midyear2005 End-of-YeaUniverse

2008 Target: 2

16 

Water Safe to Drink
Measure Description: Separately for each class of well, the percent

V wells identified in violation that are addressed by the UIC program

National Program Manager Comments:

Reg 1 Reg 2 Reg 3 Reg 4 Reg 5 Reg 6 Reg 7 Re

2002 Baseline n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2005 Commitment n/a n/a n/a 80% 100% 98% 90% 2005 Midyear n/a n/a n/a 0% 100% 98% 100% 12005 End-of-Year n/a n/a n/a 100% 100% 100% 100% 1Universe n/a n/a n/a 5 2 11 4 

Measure #: 17, 1 of 4 National O

Target measureBaseline - Under the FY03 pilot for this measure, too few states provided informatiR1, R2 and R3 do not have class I wells in violation.

Water Safe to Drink
Measure Description: Separately for each class of well, the percent

V wells identified in violation that are addressed by the UIC program

National Program Manager Comments:

Target measureBaseline - Under the FY03 pilot for this measure, too few states provided informatioRegion 1 does not have Class II wells in violation.

Measure #: 17, 2 of 4 National O

Reg 1 Reg 2 Reg 3 Reg 4 Reg 5 Reg 6 Reg 7 Re

2002 Baseline n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2005 Commitment n/a 100% 95% 80% 100% 98% 90% 2005 Midyear n/a 100% 95% 66% 61% 98% 73% 2005 End-of-Year n/a 100% 100% 100% 103% 110% 124% Universe 0 1 21 0 409 1,183 36 

Water Safe to Drink
Measure Description: Separately for each class of well, the percent

V wells identified in violation that are addressed by the UIC program

National Program Manager Comments:

Target measureBaseline - Under the FY03 pilot for this measure, too few states provided informRegion 1 and Region 10 do not have Class III wells.

Measure #: 17, 3 of 4 National O

Reg 1 Reg 2 Reg 3 Reg 4 Reg 5 Reg 6 Reg 7 Re

2002 Baseline n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2005 Commitment n/a 100% 100% 80% 100% 98% 90% 2005 Midyear n/a 100% 100% 0% 100% 98% 96% 12005 End-of-Year n/a 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 25% Universe 0 0 0 0 1 25 0 

Water Safe to Drink
Target measureBaseline - Under the FY03 pilot for this measure, too few states provided informatio

Measure Description: Separately for each class of well, the percentaV wells identified in violation that are addressed by the UIC program

National Program Manager Comments:

Measure #: 17, 4 of 4 National O

Reg 1 Reg 2 Reg 3 Reg 4 Reg 5 Reg 6 Reg 7 Re

2002 Baseline n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2005 Commitment 100% 100% 95% 80% 96% 98% 90% 2005 Midyear 100% 98% 87% 1% 100% 98% 70% 2005 End-of-Year 93% 100% 93% 94% 35% 38% 100% Universe 341 1,433 247 105 37 456 31 

Water Safe to Drink
Target measureBaseline - Under the FY03 pilot for this measure, too few states provided informatio

Measure Description: Percentage of identified Class V Motor Vehicare closed or permitted.

National Program Manager Comments:

Reg 1 Reg 2 Reg 3 Reg 4 Reg 5 Reg 6 Reg 7 Reg 

2002 Baseline n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2005 Commitment 100% 100% 100% 100% 9% 99% 90% 72005 Midyear 100% 92% 90% 100% 27% 99% 100% 

2005 End-of-Year 100.0% 102.0% 96.0% 61.0% 25.0% 72.0% 101.0% 72Universe 814 833 2,934 93 1,433 262 241 1

Measure #: 18 National O

Water Safe to Drink
Measure Description: Percentage of ground water-based source waWater Systems that have a Class V survey completed.

National Program Manager Comments:

Reg 1 Reg 2 Reg 3 Reg 4 Reg 5 Reg 6 Reg 7 Reg 

2004 Baseline 

2005 Commitment 2005 Midyear n/a 0% 11% 12.6% 30% 100% 2005 End-of-Year n/a 5.3% 8% 59% 15% 100% 11% Universe 2,211 2,616 3,481 7,368 6,172 6,181 3,404 2

Measure #: 19 National O

Indicator measureAt this time sufficient data to develop a baseline are unavailable. The universe of growater systems is taken from FY2003 SDWIS Inventory data.* HQ reports that FY 05 EOY data for all the regions should be “N/A.”

Water Safe to Drink
Target measureUniverse – is FY03 UIC Inventory Data from Grants Database. Region 1 does not h

*HQ reports that all the FY 05 EOY data for regions in Measure #20 a and b should 

Measure Description: Percentage increase in the number of inspections conducted for C

2004 baseline.

Reg 1 Reg 2 Reg 3 Reg 4 Reg 5 Reg 6 Reg 7 Re

National Program Manager Comments:

2004 Baseline n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2005 Commitment n/a 0% 1% 1% 1% 0% 2% 2005 Midyear n/a 0% 0% 4% 0% 0% 2% 2005 End-of-Year n/a 152% 1% 2% 8% 0% 2% Universe 0 543 2,588 4,421 13,964 70,733 17,001 

Measure #: 20 National O

Water Safe to Drink

Reg 1 Reg 2 Reg 3 Reg 4 Reg 5 Reg 6 Reg 7 Re

2004 Baseline n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2005 Commitment 0% 0% 2% 1% 0.5% 0% 2% 2005 Midyear 0% 0% 1% 56% 0% 0% 2% 

2005 End-of-Year 134% 13% 8% 38% 569% 0% 2% Universe 10,281 34,192 42,469 89,435 42,755 23,190 14,328 2

Class V

Class II
2008 Target: N/A

National Commitment

2002 Baseline n/a2005 Commitment completion2005 Midyear Yes2005 End-of-Year YesUniverse n/a

Measure #: 22 National OMeasure Description: EPA will complete phase I of the partial recalculation of human 

health methodology.

Measure #: 23 National OMeasure Description: Each year, EPA will identify critical drinking water contaminan

issue new or revised human health criteria under section 304 (a) of the CWA.

22

N

2002 Baseline 2005 Commitment 2005 Midyear 2005 End-of-Year Universe 

2008 T

Water Safe to Drink
Measure Description: Percentage of surface waters that are used as community water systems that have, wherever attainable, water qualiwater supply as a designated use or will have water quality standards level of human health protection. 

National Program Manager Comments:

Reg 1 Reg 2 Reg 3 Reg 4 Reg 5 Reg 6 Reg 7 Re

2002 Baseline 

2005 Commitment 2005 Midyear 2005 End-of-Year Universe

Measure #: 24 National O

Target measureThe initial baseline of 32 States will be determined in 2006.

Water Safe to Drink
Measure #: 25 National OMeasure Description: Percent of surface waters that are: 1) designated for public water 

States as highly or moderately susceptible to contamination that are monitored annually 

water quality standards for drinking water contaminants. [Baseline TBD in 2005.] 

2008 Target: n/a. 2005 End-of-Year: Data expected in 2006Measure #: 26 National O

Measure Description: Percent of surface waters that are: 1) designated by states as high

designated for public water supply use; and 3) impaired due to non-attainment of human 

have a completed TMDL. [Baseline TBD in 2005]. 2008 Target: n/a. 2005 End-of-Year: Data expected in 2006

Measure #: 27 National O

Measure Description: Percent of waters that are: 1) designated by states as highly vuln

designated for public water supply use; and 3) have a completed TMDL, that are attaininstandards for drinking water contaminants. [Baseline TBD in 2005].2008 Target: n/a. 2005 End-of-Year: Data expected in 2006

Water Safe to Drink
Fish and Shellfish Safe to Eat

Subobjective: (2.1.2) The quality of water and sediments will be improved 

increased consumption of safe fish and shellfish as measuretargets described below.

Strategic Targets:-- (

H) Improve the quality of water and sediments to allow for increased 

percentage of the river miles/lake acres identified by States or Tribes as hadvisory in 2002.

2002 Baseline: 485,205 river miles and 11,277,276 lake acres under adv2005 Commitment: 1% of advisory waters improved By 20082005 Midyear: 0% 2005 En-- (

I) Increase the percentage of shellfish-growing acres monitored by St

conditionally approved for use.

1995 Baseline: 77% of 21.6 million acres open for use.2005 Commitment: 80% acres open for use By 20082005 Midyear: 0% 2005 En
Measure #: 28, 1 of 2 National OMeasure Description: Percentage of lake acres and river miles where fish tissue will b

specific or regional consumption advisories or a determination that no consumption advi

measured separately; AK not included.)Measure #: 28, 2 of 2Measure Description: Percentage of lake acres and river miles where fish tissue will b

specific or regional consumption advisories or a determination that no consumption advi

measured separately; AK not included.)Measure #: 29Measure Description: Percentage of States that monitor and assess fish tissue contamin

National Commitment

2002 Baseline 34.5%2005 Commitment 37%2005 Midyear 0%2005 End-of-Year 35%Universe 40,826,000 lake acres

National Commitment

2002 Baseline 16%2005 Commitment 25%2005 Midyear 0%2005 End-of-Year 24%Universe 3,547,000 river miles

2008 Target: 40% 2008 Target: 20%

28, 1 of 2 28, 2 of 2

2002 2005 2005 2005 Unive

20

Fish and Shellfish Safe to Eat
Measure Description: Number of Tribal fish advisory programs thathe national fish advisory guidance to making fish advisory determinFederally recognized Tribes and Alaskan Native Villages.]

Fish and Shellfish Safe to Eat

National Program Manager Comments:

Reg 1 Reg 2 Reg 3 Reg 4 Reg 5 Reg 6 Reg 7 Re

2002 Baseline 

2005 Commitment 2005 Midyear 2005 End-of-Year 1 0 0 0 3 0 0 Universe 10 7 n/a 6 35 66 9 

Measure #: 30 National O

Target measureThis is a Headquarters reported measure.
Measure Description: Number of States, territories and authorized new fish criterion for mercury.National Program Manager Comments:Measure #: 31a, b National O

Indicator measureFY 05 End-of-Year data is not from ACS.*Note: States=50; territories=6; tribes=24; total=80 (universe).

Fish and Shellfish Safe to Eat

(a) States/Territories (b) Tribes

National Commitment

2002 Baseline 02005 Commitment n/a2005 Midyear 42005 End-of-Year 12Universe 56

Natio

2002 Baseline 2005 Commitment 2005 Midyear 2005 End-of-Year Universe 
Measure Description: Number of States that are part of the InterstaCommission and participate in the national Shellfish Information Ma

National Program Manager Comments:

Reg 1 Reg 2 Reg 3 Reg 4 Reg 5 Reg 6 Reg 7 Re

2002 Baseline 00000002005 Commitment 2005 Midyear 2005 End-of-Year Universe 

Measure #: 32 National O

Indicator measureThis is a Headquarters reported measure.

Fish and Shellfish Safe to Eat
Water Safe for Swimming

Subobjective: (2.1.3) Restore water quality to allow swimming in waters 

unsafe for swimming:2000 Baseline: 90,000 stream miles/2.6 million lake acres2005 Commitment: 2% of impaired water restored 2005 Midyear: 

Strategic Target:

-- (

K) Percent of days of the beach season that coastal and Great Lakes 

State beach safety programs will be open and safe for swimming:

2002 Baseline: 94% 2005 Commitment: 94% 

2005 Midyear: 2005 End-of-Year: 96%
Measure Description: Number of coastal and Great Lakes States anadopted, for coastal recreational waters, water quality criteria for E.C(cumulative).

Water Safe for Swimming

National Program Manager Comments:

Target measureNote: This target does not account for national proposal and promulgation of replace

required by the Beach Act. See also PAM IV-GL-4.Statutory Requirement as of April 2004.

Measure #: 33 National O

Reg 1 Reg 2 Reg 3 Reg 4 Reg 5 Reg 6 Reg 7 Re

2002 Baseline 3 0 2 0 3 1 n/a 2005 Commitment 5 4 3 4 4 2 n/a 2005 Midyear 3 4 4 6 2 2 n/a 2005 End-of-Year 5 4 4 6 6 2 n/a Univers e 5 4 3 6 7 2 n/ a 
National Commitment

2002 Baseline n/a2005 Commitment 02005 Midyear No2005 End-of-Year NoUniverse

Measure #: 34 National Office Measure Description: EPA will publish criteria for pathogens of conc

waters.

National Program Manager Comments:

Target measure

Water Safe for Swimming
Measure Description: Percentage of significant public beaches monthe BEACH Act Program.

National Program Manager Comments:

Measure #: 35 National O

Reg 1 Reg 2 Reg 3 Reg 4 Reg 5 Reg 6 Reg 7 Reg 

2002 Baseline 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2005 Commitment 100% 100% 100% 50% 100% 100% n/a 2005 Midyear 100% 100% 100% 100% 92% n/a 2005 End-of-Year 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 92% n/a Universe OST is currently in the process of developing universe data and will provide it whe

Target measureAdd estimate when universe data will be available.*No BEACH Act implementation in 2002.

Water Safe for Swimming
Target measure**Baseline is of communities with approved LTCPs; some of these communities maschedules in place to implement.

National Program Manager Comments:

Measure Description: Percentage of CSO permits with schedules in enforceable mechanisms to implement approved Long Term Control Measure #: 36 National O

Reg 1 Reg 2* Reg 3* Reg 4 Reg 5* Reg 6 Reg 7 Reg 

2003 Baseline 58 8 78 25 105 n/a 0 2005 Commitme 37% (30) 24%(25) (40%)88 (39%)11 35% (122) n/a 25%(6) 102005 Midyear 5%(4) 34%(36) 39.6%(88) 32%(9) 43%(152) n/a 

2005 End-of-Yea 36.6%(30) 39%(41) 40.1%(89) 39.2%(11) 51%(181) n/a 4.2%(1) 100

Universe 82 105 222 28 354 n/a 24 

Water Safe for Swimming
Measure Description: Number of States that have adopted the VoluGuidelines for On-site/Decentralized Wastewater Treatment Systems 

National Program Manager Comments:

Measure #: 37 National O

Reg 1 Reg 2* Reg 3* Reg 4 Reg 5* Reg 6 Reg 7 Re

2002 Baseline 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2005 Commitment 

2005 Midyear 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 2005 End-of-Year 1 1 0 2 0 0 1 Universe 6 2 5 8 6 5 4 

Indicator measure

Water Safe for Swimming
Restore and Improve Water Qu

Subobjective: Use both pollution prevention and restoration approaches to increase

-- (2.2.1a) the number of watersheds where water quality standards are met in at least 8

segments:2002 Baseline: 453 watersheds of the total 2,262 USGS cataloging unit scale watersheds 

2005 Estimate: 462 2005 Midyear: exempt 2008 Target: 600 

Reg 1 Reg 2 Reg 3 Reg 4 Reg 5 Reg 6 Reg 7 Re

2002 Baseline2005 Commitment2005 Midyear2005 End-of-Year 0 1 0 5 -7 0 1 Universe

Reg 1 Reg 2 Reg 3 Reg 4 Reg 5 Reg 6 Reg 7 Re

2002 Baseline2005 Commitment2005 Midyear2005 End-of-Year 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 Universe

-- (2.2.1b) the number of watersheds where all assessed water segments maintain their assessed water segments show improvement above conditions as of 2002:

2002 Baseline: 0 USGS cataloging unit scale watersheds2005 Estimate: 17 2005 Midyear: exempt 2008 Target: 200 
Strategic Targets:-- (L) Percent of those water bodies identified in 2000 as not attaining stand

are restored:

2002 Baseline: 21,632 waterbodies2005 End-of-Year: 1,955 2008 Estimate (Partial): 774 (3.6%) NOTE: See attached table for EPA Regional Commitments-- (N) Show improvements of at least 10% in each of four key parameters at 

monitoring stations in tribal waters:

2002 Baseline: 0 stations 2005 Commitment: 35 2005 Midyear: 2005 End-of-Year: 0-- (O) Reduce the number of households on tribal lands lacking access to ba2000 Baseline:71,000 holds 2005 Commitment: 51,000 2005 Midye

2005 End-of-Year: 46,728, 34% (cumulative FY 2002-2005)

Restore and Improve Water Qu
Final FY 05 National and Regional E

Waterbody and Watershed 

Restoration and Improvemen

Impaired Water Segement Restoration 

(Measure L) 

Region 

2000 Baseline 2005 Estimate 2005 

End-of-Year 

1 1,909 67 67 2 1,866 37 137 3 3,321 106 210 4 3,808 76 419 5 2,761 39 419 6 1,241 25 97 7 1,555 50 337 8 1,075 238 192 9 673 9 9 

10 3,423 68 68 

Totals 21,632 715 (3.3%) 1,955 

National Goal n/a 432 

(2%) 

 
Measure Description: Number of States, Territories and authorized a review of water quality standards within three years of the previous Section 303(c) of the CWA. (56 State/Territories, & 24 authorized T

Protect and Improve Water Quality on a Wate

National Program Manager Comments:Measure #: 38 National O

Reg 1 Reg 2 Reg 3 Reg 4 Reg 5 Reg 6 Reg 7 Re

2002 Baseline 4 1 4 7 5 4 2 2005 Commitment 2005 Midyear 2 3 5 0 7 2 

2005 End-of-Year 2 3 6 8 6 5 4 Univers e 6 4 6 8 6 5 4 

Indicator measure*End-of-Year data includes both States and Tribes

States/Territories and Tribes*
2008 Target: 15

Measure #: 39 National OMeasure Description: Number of new or revised criteria documents for water pollutan

information necessary for State adoption or revision of a water quality standard protocolincluding needed implementation protocols and methods.Measure #: 47 National OMeasure Description: EPA reports results of a statistical survey of the condition of the 

cooperation with the States.

National Commitment

2002 Baseline n/a2005 Commitment 82005 Midyear 22005 End-of-Year 8Universe n/a

N

2002 Baseline 2005 Commitment 2005 Midyear2005 End-of-Year Universe

2008 T

39 47

Protect and Improve Water Quality on a Wate
Measure Description: Number of States and Territories that have aquality standards, and EPA has approved, nutrient criteria for fresh wand reservoirs) (cumulative).

National Program Manager Comments:

Measure #: 40 National O

Reg 1 Reg 2 Reg 3 Reg 4 Reg 5 Reg 6 Reg 7 Re

2002 Baseline 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2005 Commitment 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 2005 Midyear 0 0 0 1 0 1 2005 End-of-Year 0 0 2 1 0 1 0 Univers e 6 4 6 8 6 5 4 

Target measure

Protect and Improve Water Quality on a Wate
Measure Description: Number of States and Territories that have aquality programs for streams and small rivers, biological criteria desidetermination of attainment of water quality standard use designationbiological criteria may include quantitative endpoints or narrative criimplementation procedures or translators] (cumulative).

National Program Manager Comments:

Measure #: 41 National O

Reg 1 Reg 2 Reg 3 Reg 4 Reg 5 Reg 6 Reg 7 Re

2002 Baseline 3 0 0 6 1 3 1 2005 Commitment 4 0 0 6 1 3 3 2005 Midyear 4 0 0 6 1 3 3 2005 End-of-Year 4 0 0 6 1 3 3 Universe 6 4 6 8 6 5 4 

Target measure

Protect and Improve Water Quality on a Wate
Measure Description: Number of Tribes that have water quality sta(cumulative).

National Program Manager Comments:

Target measureThe universe reflects an OST staff estimate of the number of tribes that meet two of thRequirements: (a) that a tribe be federally recognized, and (b) that the tribe have a res

Reservation and/or tribal trust lands.)

Measure #: 42 National O

Reg 1 Reg 2 Reg 3 Reg 4 Reg 5 Reg 6 Reg 7 Re

2002 Baseline 0 0 n/a 2 2 9 0 2005 Commitment 0 1 n/a 2 3 11 0 2005 Midyear 0 0 n/a 2 2 10 0 2005 End-of-Year 0 0 n/a 2 2 9 0 Universe 8 8 0 6 31 66 9 

Protect and Improve Water Quality on a Wate
Measure Description: Each year, percentage of State/Tribal water qsubmissions that are approved/disapproved by EPA within 90 days.

National Program Manager Comments:

Target measureUniverse changes annually based on number of WQS submissions.

Measure #: 43 National O

Reg 1 Reg 2 Reg 3 Reg 4 Reg 5 Reg 6 Reg 7 Re

2002 Baseline n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2005 Commitment 75% 75% 75% 73% 50% 75% 85% 2005 Midyear 0% 75% 50% 98% 100% 50% 100% 2005 End-of-Year n/a 66.7% 53.3% 77.8% 100.0% 44.4% 67.0% 6Universe 

Protect and Improve Water Quality on a Wate
Measure Description: Each year, the number of States & Territories begun implementing a monitoring strategy [including a State approacSTORET] consistent with national guidance. (i.e, March 2003 guidanmonitoring elements) (cumulative).

National Program Manager Comments:

Measure #: 44 National O

Reg 1 Reg 2 Reg 3 Reg 4 Reg 5 Reg 6 Reg 7 Re

2002 Baseline 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2005 Commitment 6 4 6 8 6 5 4 2005 Midyear 3 3 2 2 3 4 2 2005 End-of-Year 6 3 6 6 6 3 4 Univers e 6 4 6 8 6 5 4 

Target measure

Protect and Improve Water Quality on a Wate
Measure Description: Number of States and Territories that providthe condition of their waters consistent with sections 305(b) and 303(and EPA's integrated assessment guidance (cumulative).

National Program Manager Comments:

Measure #: 45 National O

Reg 1 Reg 2 Reg 3 Reg 4 Reg 5 Reg 6 Reg 7 Re

2002 Baseline 3 1 4 2 1 4 0 2005 Commitment 6 3 6 4 4 5 2 2005 Midyear 4 3 6 4 4 4 0 2005 End-of-Year 4 3 6 4 4 5 1 Univers e 6 4 6 8 6 5 4 

Target measure

Protect and Improve Water Quality on a Wate
Target measure*Measure commitment and End-of-Year data deferred until FY 2006.

Measure Description: Number of Tribes that currently receive EPA funding that have d

monitoring strategies that serve all water quality management needs, and address all tri

types and that provide their water quality data in a system accessible for storage in E

National Program Manager Comments:

Measure #: 46 National O

Reg 1 Reg 2 Reg 3 Reg 4 Reg 5 Reg 6 Reg 7 Re

2002 Baseline 0 0 n/a 0 0 0 0 2005 Commitment 

2005 Midyear 2005 End-of-Year 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Universe 7 1 n/a 5 29 35 4 

Protect and Improve Water Quality on a Wate

Reg 1 Reg 2 Reg 3 Reg 4 Reg 5 Reg 6 Reg 7 Re

2002 Baseline 0 0 n/a 00002005 Commitment 2005 Midyear 2005 End-of-Year 0 0 0 0000Universe 7 1 n/a 5 29 35 4 

Number of Tribes that Currently Receive EPA Funding that have Developed CompNumber of Tribes that Provide their Water Quality Data in a System Accessible for 
Measure Description: The number of watershed based plans, supported under State 

since the beginning of FY 2002 that have been developed and that are being implemen

National Program Manager Comments:

Measure #: 48, 1 and 3 of 4 National O

Reg 1 Reg 2 Reg 3 Reg 4 Reg 5 Reg 6 Reg 7 Re

2002 Baseline 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2005 Commitment 

2005 Midyear 1 26 32 22 0 20 3 2005 End-of-Year 1 26 35 22 24 24 46 Universe 

Indicator measure.

Protect and Improve Water Quality on a Wate

Reg 1 Reg 2 Reg 3 Reg 4 Reg 5 Reg 6 Reg 7 Re

2002 Baseline 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2005 Commitment 

2005 Midyear 1 13 32 22 0 20 3 2005 End-of-Year 8 26 35 22 89 24 12 Universe 

Number of Watershed-Based Plans that have been DevelopedNumber of Watershed-Based Plans that are being implemented
Measure Description: The number of river miles/acres covered by watershed-based p

are being implemented.

National Program Manager Comments:

Measure #: 48, 2 and 4 of 4 National O

Protect and Improve Water Quality on a Wate

Indicator measure. These are Headquarters-reported measures.

2

Number of River Miles/Acres covered by watershed-based plans that are being i

2

Number of River Miles/Acres covered by Watershed-Based Plans that have been 

National Commitment

2002 Baseline n/a2005 Commitment 02005 Midyear 02005 End-of-Year 0Universe n/a

National Commitment

2002 Baseline n/a2005 Commitment 02005 Midyear 02005 End-of-Year 0Universe n/a
Measure Description: Number of watershed-based plans (and water under State Nonpoint Source Management Programs since the beginnbeen substantially implemented (cumulative).

National Program Manager Comments:

Measure #: 49 National O

Reg 1 Reg 2 Reg 3 Reg 4 Reg 5 Reg 6 Reg 7 Re

2002 Baseline n / a n / a n / a n / a n / a n / a n / a 2005 Commitment 2 6 1 7 20 2 2 2005 Midyear 2005 End-of-Year 3 6 1 16 21 2 15 Universe n / a n / a n / a n / a n / a n / a n / a 

Target measure

Protect and Improve Water Quality on a Wate
Measure #: 50 NationaMeasure Description: Number of nationally significant watersheapproach to protecting and restoring water quality is being fostered Grants (cumulative.)

National Program Manager Comments:

Reg 1 Reg 2 Reg 3 Reg 4 Reg 5 Reg 6 Reg 7 Re

2004 Baseline 5 3 4 2 5 3 3 2005 Commitment 

2005 Midyear 2005 End-of-Year Cumulative Totals Universe 

Target measure2004 Baseline includes grants awarded in FY 03 and FY 04. 18 new grants award*05 distribution of watershed grants TBD; FY 05 Commitment is recorded as Nati

Protect and Improve Water Quality on a Wate
Measure Description: Percentage of TMDLs approved since the begdeveloped as part of a larger, watershed planning process that addresprotection of all waters within a watershed.

National Program Manager Comments:

Measure #: 51 National O

Reg 1 Reg 2 Reg 3 Reg 4 Reg 5 Reg 6 Reg 7 Re

2004 Baseline 2005 Commitment 2005 Midyear 0% 29% 81% 22% 17% 20% 0% 2005 End-of-Year 53% 19% 95% 22% 55% 0% 0% Universe 

Indicator measure

Protect and Improve Water Quality on a Wate
Target measure: Number of TMDLs needed to be completed in FY05 in order to macompletion that complies with national policy (i.e. “on pace”)*Regions 3, 6, 8 and 9 TMDL pace numbers (1,615, 164, 427, and 298, respectively

with the provisions of our computational guidance at Http://www.epa.gov/water/wat

Measure Description: Percentage of the TMDLs required for waters curr

established or approved by EPA within 13 years of listing consistent with natbe based on state schedules or straight-line rates that ensure that the national p

National Program Manager Comments:

Measure #: 52 National O

Reg 1 Reg 2 Reg 3* Reg 4 Reg 5 Reg 6* Reg 7 R

FY05 pace 335 65 1,550 300 325 93 205 2005Commitment 51%(171) 100%(65) 62%(1005) 81%(243) 92%(300) 91%(149) 100%(205) 1002005Midyear** 14%(48) 0%(0) 65%(1,000) 99%(298) 23%(74) 30%(28) 296%(607) 92005End-of-Year 22%(73) 95%(62) 86%(1,336) 161%(484) 177%(575) 71%(66) 324%(664) 92All TMDLs 3,354 2,288 12,363 6,528 9,913 1,870 1,704 2

Protect and Improve Water Quality on a Wate
Measure Description: Number of Tribes that currently receive EPA participated with States &/or EPA in development of measures (e.g., plans) to restore and protect watersheds with impaired waters.

National Program Manager Comments:

Measure #: 53 National O

Reg 1 Reg 2 Reg 3 Reg 4 Reg 5 Reg 6 Reg 7 Re

2002 Baseline 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2005 Commitment 3 0 n/a 0 3 0 1 2005 Midyear 3 0 n/a 0 2 0 0 2005 End-of-Year 3 0 n/a 0 5 0 0 Universe 7 1 n/a 5 29 35 4 

Target measure

Protect and Improve Water Quality on a Wate
Measure Description: Percentage of TMDL approvals occurring sinfor which EPA took approval action within 30 days of submission.

National Program Manager Comments:

Measure #: 54 National O

Reg 1 Reg 2 Reg 3 Reg 4 Reg 5 Reg 6 Reg 7 Re

2004 Baseline 

2005 Commitment 2005 Midyear 2005 End-of-Year 68.0% 91.0% 60.6% 72.0% 60.0% 100.0% 100.0% Universe 

Indicator measure

Protect and Improve Water Quality on a Wate
Measure Description: Number of TMDLs approved by EPA or watnutrient-impaired waters on a state impaired-waters list that contain p(cumulative). Provisions could include a range of practicable WLA/Lachieve the TMDL or incorporation of a state-approved trading framimplement the TMDL.National Program Manager Comments:Measure #: 55 National O

Reg 1 Reg 2 Reg 3 Reg 4 Reg 5 Reg 6 Reg 7 Re

2002 Baseline 1 1 0 2 1 0 0 2005 Commitment 1 2 5 6 1 2 1 2005 Midyear 2 1 2 0 1 0 0 2005 End-of-Year 2 1 4 9 1 0 0 Universe n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 

Target measure

Protect and Improve Water Quality on a Wate
Measure Description:. Number of waterbodies identified by States inonpoint sources or by both point & nonpoint sources that are fully r[Estimated 5,967 waterbodies impaired significantly by nonpoint sou

National Program Manager Comments:

Measure #: 56 National O

Reg 1 Reg 2 Reg 3 Reg 4 Reg 5 Reg 6 Reg 7 Re

2000 Baseline 

2005 Commitment 2005 Midyear 2005 End-of-Year 1 0 2 5 2 0 4 Universe 

Indicator measure*Note: Regional distribution of nonpoint source impaired water baseline to be deter

Protect and Improve Water Quality on a Wate
Measure Description: Annual reduction in lbs/tons of nitrogen, phosphorous, and sed

waterbodies.

National Program Manager Comments:

Measure #: 57 National Office Lead: 

Reg 1 Reg 2 Reg 3 Reg 4 Reg 5 Reg 6 Reg 7 Re

2004 Baseline 

2005 Commitment 2005 Midyear 0 0 0 2005 End-of-Year 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Universe 

Indicator measure. 2005 is truncated year with data for between 9/05 and 2/06 only. Subsequent years worth of data

Protect and Improve Water Quality on a Wate

.

Reg 1 Reg 2 Reg 3 Reg 4 Reg 5 Reg 6 Reg 7 Re

2002 Baseline 2005 Commitment 2005 Midyear 0 0 0 

2005 End-of-Year 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Universe

Reg 1 Reg 2 Reg 3 Reg 4 Reg 5 Reg 6 Reg 7 Reg 

2002 Baseline 

2005 Commitment 2005 Midyear 0 0 0 2005 End-of-Year 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Universe

Sediment

Nitrogen

Phosphorous
Measure Description: Number and dollar value of projects finance

loans to prevent polluted runoff (cumulative).

National Program Manager Comments:

Measure #: 58 National O

Reg 1 Reg 2 Reg 3 Reg 4 Reg 5 Reg 6 Reg 7 Re

2002 Baseline 357 167 1428 2 1880 26 99 2005 Commitment 

2005 Midyear 357 201 1,693 0 0 198 0 2005 End-of-Year 180 221 1856 8 2782 199 441 Universe 

Dollar Value

Reg 1 Reg 2 Reg 3 Reg 4 Reg 5 Reg 6 Reg 7 Reg 8 

2002 Baseline 0.246 0.658 0.096 0.002 0.184 0.011 0.021 0.108 2005 Commitment 2005 Midyear $0 $772,832,603 $117,000,000 $0 $0 $16,900,000 $0 $0 2005 End-of-Year $168.62 $852.65 $145.37 $32.56 $286.57 $194.80 $265.00 $162.6Universe 

Indicator measure

Protect and Improve Water Quality on a Wate

Number
Measure Description: Percentage of all NPDES permits that are beginning in 2005, the percentage of high priority permits that are alsfacilities in Indian Country are to meet the same standard/schedule. once universe of priority permits is defined in cooperation with State

National Program Manager Comments:

Measure #: 59, 1 of 4

National O

Reg 1 Reg 2 Reg 3 Reg 4 Reg 5 Reg 6 Reg 7 Re

2002 Baseline 55.6% 87.3% 85.4% 73.5% 85.2% 86.4% 73.1% 2005 Commitment 80% 85% 90% 85% 90% 87% 85% 2005 Midyear 68.30% 82.10% 87.80% 92.50% 86.20% 95.60% 86.90% 82005 End-of-Year 64.0% 93.7% 85.7% 87.0% 86.7% 93.0% 82.0% Universe 1,635 3,598 17,086 18,616 13,654 24,002 8,925 

Target measure“All” is defined as “All individual (major and minor) permittees, and all facilities water general permits.”*In response to an IG recommendation, the 2002 baseline has been adjusted to cortherefore is now based on a universe of 96,151 with 76,549 current.

Protect and Improve Water Quality on a Wate
Target measure*Universe varies annually; universe and commitments documented in Agency data

Measure Description: Percentage of all NPDES permits that are conbeginning in 2005, the percentage of high priority permits that ar

facilities in Indian Country are to meet the same standard/schedule. once universe of priority permits is defined in cooperation with State

National Program Manager Comments:

Measure #: 59, 2 of 4 National O

Reg 1 Reg 2 Reg 3 Reg 4 Reg 5 Reg 6 Reg 7 Re

2002 Baseline n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2005 Commitment 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 2005 Midyear 20.00% 13.50% 67.70% 21.00% 43.00% 29.00% 43.00% 92005 End-of-Year 62% 107% 100% 84% 157% 98% 100% Universe * * * * * * * 

Protect and Improve Water Quality on a Wate
Target measureNote: 90% target is annual target starting in 2005.

Measure Description: Percentage of all NPDES permits that are c

beginning in 2005, the percentage of high priority permits that are alsfacilities in Indian Country are to meet the same standard/schedule.

National Program Manager Comments:

Measure #: 59, 3 of 4 National O

Reg 1 Reg 2 Reg 3 Reg 4 Reg 5 Reg 6 Reg 7 Re

2002 Baseline n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2005 Commitment 50%(1) 100% n/a 100% 80% (35) 90% (12) 85% (9) 902005 Midyear 50%(1) 50%(1) n/a 76%(16) 90%(36) 123%(16) .1%(1) 

2005 End-of-Year 0 2 n/a 16 37 8 1 Universe 2 2 n/a 21 40 13 10 

Protect and Improve Water Quality on a Wate
Target measure

*Universe varies annually; universe and commitments documented in Agency datab

Measure Description: Percentage of all NPDES permits that are conbeginning in 2005, the percentage of high priority permits that are 

facilities in Indian Country are to meet the same standard/schedule. 

National Program Manager Comments:

Measure #: 59, 4 of 4 National O

Reg 1 Reg 2 Reg 3 Reg 4 Reg 5 Reg 6 Reg 7 R

2002 Baseline 2005 Commitment 100% 100% n/a 100% 95% n/a 95% 2005 Midyear 100% 50% n/a 100% 75% n/a 6% 2005 End-of-Year 100.0% 100.0% n/a 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Universe*

Protect and Improve Water Quality on a Wate
Measure Description: Number of authorized States or Territorieexisting regulations and/or statutes where necessary to reflect new 

number of all States or Territories with CAFOs in which Statewide gissued, or the permit program has otherwise been substantially implerequirements (cumulative).

National Program Manager Comments:

Target measure*Universe = 43: Considering a total of 53 States or territories that EPA tracks for compliance, six Statare not authorized to issue NPDES permits (MA,NH, NM, OK, ID, Puerto Rico); four States/territorieAnd Virgin Islands).Baseline is from 2003.

Measure #: 60, 1 of 2

National O

Reg 1 Reg 2 Reg 3 Reg 4 Reg 5 Reg 6 Reg 7 R

2003 Baseline 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 2005 Commitment 2 1 5 8 6 3 3 2005 Midyear 2 0 1 5 3 3 1 2005 End-of-Year 2 0 1 6 4 3 1 Universe 3 2 5 8 6 3 4 

Protect and Improve Water Quality on a Wate
Measure Description: Number of authorized States or Territories thregulations and/or statutes where necessary to reflect new CAFO reqStates or Territories with CAFOs in which Statewide general per

the permit program has otherwise been substantially implemented corequirements (cumulative).

National Program Manager Comments:

Target measure*Universe is 49. States/territories that have no CAFOs include: RI, AK, DC, VL. Territories that hIssues permits in MA, NJ, NM, OK, & ID.NOTE: “Waterkeeper” court decision affects interpretation of implementation status.

Measure #: 60, 2 of 2 National O

Reg 1 Reg 2 Reg 3 Reg 4 Reg 5 Reg 6 Reg 7 Re

2002 Baseline 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2005 Commitment 2 3 5 8 5 2 3 2005 Midyear 0 2 1 3 5 1 4 2005 End-of-Year 0 2 1 8 5 1 1 Universe 5 3 5 8 6 5 4 

Protect and Improve Water Quality on a Wate
Measure Description: Percentage of States/Regions that have issued requiring storm water management programs for all Phase II municipassumes continued availability of general permits) 

National Program Manager Comments:

Measure #: 61 National O

Reg 1 Reg 2 Reg 3 Reg 4 Reg 5 Reg 6 Reg 7 Re

2002 Baseline 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2005 Commitment 100%(6) 100%(2) 100%(5) 100%(8) 100%(6) 100%(5) 100%(4) 12005 Midyear 100%(6) 100%(2) 160%(8) 75%(6) 67%(4) 60%(3) 50%(2) 12005 End-of-Year 6 2 8 8 4 3 4 Universe 6 2 5 8 6 5 4 

Target measure(Note: assumes continued availability of general permits) 

Protect and Improve Water Quality on a Wate
Measure Description: Percentage of permitting authorities (i.e. StatNPDES general permits requiring storm water pollution prevention pconstruction (estimated annual load reduction of 17 billion pounds of continued availability of general permits) 

National Program Manager Comments:

Measure #: 62 National O

Reg 1 Reg 2 Reg 3 Reg 4 Reg 5 Reg 6 Reg 7 R

2002 Baseline 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2005 Commitment 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 2005 Midyear 125%(5) 100%(3) 100%(5) 88%(7) 83%(5) 125%(5) 75%(3) 12005 End-of-Year 100%(5) 100%(3) 100% (5) 100%(8) 83%(5) 100%(5) 75%(3) 1Univers e 4 3 5 8 6 4 4 

Target measure*Total Universe = 47-- 45 NPDES Authorized States plus 1 NPDES authorized Territory = 46-- EPA HQ issued a permit that covers all five non-authorized States and territoriefederal facilities, counted as one permit authority.

Protect and Improve Water Quality on a Wate
Measure Description: Percentage of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs) in POTWs witpercentage of known Categorical Industrial Users (CIUs) in non-pretreatment POTWs th

that implement applicable pretreatment requirements.Measure #: 63 

Reg 1 Reg 2 Reg 3 Reg 4 Reg 5 Reg 6 Reg 7 Reg 

2002 Baseline 98.5% 99.4% 99.0% 98.5% 84.8% 95.6% 98.1% 982005 Commitment 

2005 Midyear 100% 99.67% 99% 100% 91% 97% FY 05 EOY % 100.0% 99.67% 98.98% 100.00% 99.00% 99.50% 81.00% 100FY 05 EOY # 1,589 1,882 1,790 3,932 4,899 2,132 829 5Universe 1,589 1,888 1,810 3,871 5,327 2,143 1,024 7

CIUs

Reg 1 Reg 2 Reg 3 Reg 4 Reg 5 Reg 6 Reg 7 Reg 

2002 Baseline 

2005 Commitment 2005 Midyear 100% 93% 89% 100% 99% 17% FY 05 EOY % 100.0% 100% 91.4% 100.0% 100.0% 17.2% 78.0% 10FY 05 # 44 117 74 31 458 17 31 Universe 44 117 81 321 761 99 241 

Indicator measure

Protect and Improve Water Quality on a Wate

SIUs
2008 Target: 2.4 billion lbs 

Measure #: 64 National OMeasure Description: Number of pounds of pollution loadings to waterbodies from ind2008) as a result of national industrial water pollution control regulations.Measure #: 65 National OMeasure Description: Estimated annual reduction in pounds of pollutants discharged to permits for storm water, POTWs, CAFOs, CSOs, and industrial discharges. 

Measure #: 66 National OMeasure Description: Using the planning process called for in section 304(m) of the C

industrial categories where discharges to waterbodies or releases to Publicly Owned Treasignificant risk to water quality and determine whether to develop new national pollution 

regulations, or develop other control tools.

National Commitment

2002 Baseline .6 billion lbs2005 Commitment 1 billion lbs2005 Midyear 0.5 billion lbs2005 End-of-Year 1.0 billion lbsUniverse

64

National Indicator

2002 Baseline 109 billion lbs2005 Commitment (384 million lbs)2005 Midyear 0.16 billion lbs2005 End-of-Year 0.16 billion lbsUniverse

65

2002 2005 2005 2005 Unive

2008 Target: n/a 2008 

Protect and Improve Water Quality on a Wate
Measure Description: Number of dischargers with permits providing for trading be

pollution sources and the number of dischargers that carried out trades.

National Program Manager Comments:

Measure #: 67 National O

Reg 1 Reg 2 Reg 3 Reg 4 Reg 5 Reg 6 Reg 7 R

2002 Baseline 2 5 4 55 3 0 0 2005 Commitment 

2005 Midyear 2 21 2 26 0 0 0 2005 End-of-Year 80 21 2 30 84 0 0 Universe 

Indicator measureFY 05 End-of-Year data is not from ACS.

Protect and Improve Water Quality on a Wate

Reg 1 Reg 2 Reg 3 Reg 4 Reg 5 Reg 6 Reg 7 Re

2002 Baseline 2 1 4 40 1 0 0 2005 Commitment 

2005 Midyear 0012000 2005 End-of-Year 79 0 1 8 3 0 0 Universe 

Number of Dischargers with Permits Providing for TradingNumber of Dischargers that Carried Out Trades
Measure Description: Number of watersheds in which a watershed permit(s) have States issuing NPDES permits using a rotating basin process.

National Program Manager Comments:

Measure #: 68 National Office Lead: 

Reg 1 Reg 2 Reg 3 Reg 4 Reg 5 Reg 6 Reg 7 Re

2002 Baseline 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2005 Commitment 2005 Midyear 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 2005 End-of-Year 1 0 0 1 50 0 12 Universe 

Indicator measure

Protect and Improve Water Quality on a Wate

Reg 1 Reg 2 Reg 3 Reg 4 Reg 5 Reg 6 Reg 7 Re

2002 Baseline 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2005 Commitment 2005 Midyear 2 0 2 6 0 2 1 2005 End-of-Year 2 0 2 6 1 2 1 Univers e 6 2 5 8 6 5 4 

Number of WatershedsNumber of States Issuing Permits Using a Rotating Basin Process
Measure Description: Percentage of NPDES program authorities where a comprehensiintegrity has been conducted (beginning in FY 04) and the percentage of assessed proimplementation schedules for all those follow-up actions for which a schedule has been 

National Program Manager Comments:

Measure #: 69 National O

Reg 1 Reg 2 Reg 3 Reg 4 Reg 5 Reg 6 Reg 7 Re

2002 Baseline 

2005 Commitment 2005 Midyear 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 2005 End-of-Year 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 1Universe 6 4 6 8 6 5 4 

Indicator measure69a Universe = 54; 50 States, 4 Territories (VI, PR, DC, PIT), 10 Regions69b Universe = 45 authorized States, 1 authorized Territory; 5 non-authorized States, 3 non-auth

Protect and Improve Water Quality on a Wate

Reg 1 Reg 2 Reg 3 Reg 4 Reg 5 Reg 6 Reg 7 Re

2002 Baseline 

2005 Commitment 2005 Midyear 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2005 End-of-Year 100.0% 80.0% 86.0% 89.0% 86.0% 83.0% 60.0% 1Universe 7 5 7 9 7 6 5 

Assessment ConductedPrograms Complying with Implementation Schedules
Measure Description: Fund utilization rate [cumulative loan agreemcumulative funds available for projects] for the CWSRF.

National Program Manager Comments:

Measure #: 70 National O

Reg 1 Reg 2 Reg 3 Reg 4 Reg 5 Reg 6 Reg 7 Re

2002 Baseline 95% 92% 81% 90% 92% 88% 84% 2005 Commitment 95% 90% 89% 90% 94% 83% 85% 2005 Midyear 0% 90% 89% 0% 91% 83% 87% 2005 End-of-Year 110% 94% 89% 95% 98% 91% 88% Universe n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 

Target measure

Protect and Improve Water Quality on a Wate
Measure Description: Return on Federal investment [cumulative dodisbursements to projects divided by cumulative Federal outlays for pfunding decisions (cumulative). 

National Program Manager Comments:

Measure #: 71 National O

Reg 1 Reg 2 Reg 3 Reg 4 Reg 5 Reg 6 Reg 7 Re

2002 Baseline 2.43 $ 2.56 $ 1.49$ 1.52$ 1.67 $ 2.61$ 1.98 $ 

$ 

2005 Commitment 2005 Midyear $0.00 $2.39 $1.54 $0.00 $1.88 $2.64 $0.00 2005 End-of-Year $2.69 $2.89 $1.58 $1.68 $1.98 $2.47 $2.21 Universe 

Indicator measure

Protect and Improve Water Quality on a Wate
Measure Description: Number of States using integrated planning aCWSRF funding decisions (cumulative).

National Program Manager Comments:

Measure #: 72 National O

Reg 1 Reg 2 Reg 3 Reg 4 Reg 5 Reg 6 Reg 7 Re

2002 Baseline 1 2 2 2 2 1 1 2005 Commitment 1 2 4 3 3 2 2 2005 Midyear 1 2 4 2 2 2 2 2005 End-of-Year 1 2 4 3 3 2 2 Universe 6 3 5 8 6 5 4 

Target measure

Protect and Improve Water Quality on a Wate
Protect Coastal and Ocean Wat

Subobjective: (2.2.2) Improve national and regional coastal aquatic ecosystem 

scale of the National Coastal Condition Report. (Rating is a 5-

5 is good.)2002 Baseline: “fair/poor” or 2.4 2005 Commitment: 2.5 

2005 Midyear: 2.7 2005 End-of-Year: 2.7

Strategic Targets:

-- (

P) Maintain water clarity and dissolved oxygen in coastal waters at the n

2002 National Coastal Condition Report.

2002 Baseline: 4.3 for water clarity; 4.5 for dissolved oxygen2005 Commitment: Maintain 2008 Targe

2005 Midyear: 2.6 for water clarity; 4.6 for dissolved oxygen2005 End-of-Year: 2.6 for water clarity; 4.6 for dissolved ox

-- (

Q) Improve ratings reported on the national “good/fair/poor” scale of the 

for:

- Coastal wetlands loss:

2002 Baseline: 1.4 2005 Commitment: 1.5 2005 Midyear: 1.

2005 End-of-Year: 1.7
- Contamination of sediments:

2002 Baseline: 1.3 2005 Commitment: 1.4 2005 Midyear: 2

2005 End-of-Year: 2.10

- Benthic quality:

2002 Baseline: 1.4 2005 Commitment: 1.5 2005 Midyear: 2

2005 End-of-Year: 2.0

- Eutrophic conditions:

2002 Baseline: 1.7 2005 Commitment: 1.8 2005 Midyear: 3

2005 End-of-Year: 3.0

-- (IV-D) Working with the National Estuary Program partners, protect or rewithin the study areas for the 28 estuaries that are part of the NEP.

2002 Baseline: 0 acres restored 2005 Commitment: 25,000 2008 

2005 End-of-Year: 449,242 acres

Protect Coastal and Ocean Wat
Improve Coastal and Ocean Waters

Measure #: 73 National OMeasure Description: Publish a revised national Coastal Condition Report describing t

coastal waters.

Measure #: 76 National OMeasure Description: Each year, the National Marine Debris Monitoring Network will Measure #: 77 National OMeasure Description: Mandatory requirements to exchange ballast water will be develinvasive species in U.S. coastal waters.

National Commitment

2002 Baseline n/a2005 Commitment 1 in 20042005 Midyear2005 End-of-Year yesUniverse

2008 Target: 1 (in 2006)

National Commitment

2002 Baseline 70%2005 Commitment 100%2005 Midyear 100%2005 End-of-Year 100%Universe

20202020U

2008 Target: 100% 20

73 76 
Measure Description: Number of dredged material management plans that are in pdeveloped by COE-Led stakeholder process and the percentage of dredged material fr

a beneficial manner. 

20

National Program Manager Comments:

Measure #: 74 National O

Reg 1 Reg 2 Reg 3 Reg 4 Reg 5 Reg 6 Reg 7 Re

2002 Baseline 2 1 4 3 n/a 3 n/a 2005 Commitment n/a n/a 

2005 Midyear 1 2 0 n/a 3 n/a 2005 End-of-Year 2 1 2 0 n/a 3 n/a Universe 8 2 6 20 n/a 10 n/a 

Indicator measureNote:*This number represents major ports/harbors. There are approximately 110 coastal ports and estimates. COE estimates a total of 300 commercial harbors and more than 600 smaller harbors in 

Improve Coastal and Ocean Waters

Reg 1 Reg 2 Reg 3 Reg 4 Reg 5 Reg 6 Reg 7 Re

2002 Baseline 

2005 Commitment2005 Midyear2005 End-of-Year Universe 

Plans in placeMaterial Managed in a Beneficial Manner
Measure Description: Number of ocean disposal sites with approvemonitoring plans that are monitored in the reporting year, including tOcean Survey Vessel.

2

National Program Manager Comments:

Measure #: 75 National O

Reg 1 Reg 2 Reg 3 Reg 4 Reg 5 Reg 6 Reg 7 Re

2002 Baseline 0 2 2 12 n/a 16 n/a 2005 Commitment 

2005 Midyear 3 2 2 4 n/a 5 n/a 2005 End-of-Year 3 0 1 5 n/a 6 n/a Universe 5 4 2 18 n/a 15 n/a 

Indicator measure

Improve Coastal and Ocean Waters
Measure #: 78 National OMeasure Description: Develop standards for the discharge of ballast water, including c

Measure #: 79 National O

Measure Description: Work with other Nations to secure an international agreement on rigorous performance standards designed to prevent future introductions of non-native aq

the discharge of ships’ ballast water.

Measure #: 80 National OMeasure Description: Propose standards for black water and gray water for cruise ship

National Commitment

2002 Baseline n/a2005 Commitment n/a2005 Midyear no2005 End-of-Year noUniverse

2008 Target: Completed in 2008

78

National Commitment

2002 Baseline n/a2005 Commitment n/a2005 Midyear No2005 End-of-Year NoUniverse

79

20202020U

2008 Target: Completed in 2006 20

Improve Coastal and Ocean Waters
Measure #: 81 National OMeasure Description: Number of coastal States in which State air and water officials h

and management of air/water interface issues (cumulative). 

Measure #: 82 National OMeasure Description: Number of coastal States in which there is at least one mercury d(cumulative). 

2008 Target: n/a

2002 Baselin2005 Comm2005 Midyea2005 End-of-Universe 

National Indicator

2002 Baseline 172005 Commitment n/a2005 Midyear2005 End-of-Year 21Universe 31

81 

Improve Coastal and Ocean Waters
Measure Description: Number of NEP priority actions in CCMPs that have been initiat

completed.

2

National Program Manager Comments:

Measure #: IV-NEP-1 National O

Reg 1 Reg 2 Reg 3 Reg 4 Reg 5 Reg 6 Reg 7 R

2004 Baseline 261 355 194 249 128 

2005 Commitment 2005 Midyear 0 2 2 2 5 2005 End-of-Year 5 18 4 2 n/a 177 n/a Universe 289 463 214 365 139 

Indicator measure

Improve Coastal and Ocean Waters

Reg 1 Reg 2 Reg 3 Reg 4 Reg 5 Reg 6 Reg 7 R

2004 Baseline 89 36 29 95 12 

2005 Commitment 2005 Midyear 0 2 0 0 128 

2005 End-of-Year 135 11 0 9 n/a 13 n/a Universe 289 463 214 9 139 

Priority Actions InitiatedPriority Actions Completed
Measure #: IV-NEP-2 National OMeasure Description: Publish an NEP Coastal Condition Report decoastal waters in the 28 estuaries in the NEP using the National Coasindicators as well as NEP specific indicators that can be aggregated tlevel.

National Commitm

2002 Baseline 2005 Commitment 2005 Midyear 2005 End-of-Year Universe

2008 Target: By 200

Improve Coastal and Ocean Waters
Measure Description: Return on Federal investment [cumulative d(cash or in-kind) leveraged by Section 320 funds for all NEPs (for L

National Program Manager Comments:

Measure #: IV-NEP-3 National Office Lead

Reg 1 Reg 2 Reg 3 Reg 4 Reg 5 Reg 6 Reg 7 Re

2002 Baseline $6.4 $112.5 $2.0 $17.9 $11.3 

2005 Commitment 2005 Midyear $0 $0 $0 $0 n/a $4 n/a n2005 End-of-Yea $12.3 $46.9 $7.7 $19.1 n/a $4.5 n/a n

Universe 

Indicator measure

Improve Coastal and Ocean Water
Measure Description: NEPs have indicators in place to track key enin their estuary based on CCMP priorities and emerging issues, incluappropriate, and to enable each NEP to periodically report on status a

2

National Program Manager Comments:

Measure #: IV-NEP-4 National Office Lead: 

Reg 1 Reg 2 Reg 3 Reg 4 Reg 5 Reg 6 Reg 7 Re

2002 Baseline 3 1 1 1 0 2 0 2005 Commitment 

2005 Midyear 6 3 3 0 2 2005 End-of-Year 6 4 3 5 n/a 2 n/a Universe 6 4* 3 6 3 

Indicator measure.*There are two "shared" NEPs in Region 2. For purposes of this measure, one of 

Island Sound Study, is reported under Region 1, and the other, Delaware Estuary, 

Improve Coastal and Ocean Waters
Measure #: 83 National OMeasure Description: Develop improved methods to assess and value ecological and rin water quality.Measure #: 84 National OMeasure Description: EPA approved new or revised analytical methods will be availab

pathogens, and for selected protozoan pathogens of concern for people swimming at beaMeasure #: 85 National OMeasure Description: Number of EPA-approved new or improved analytical methods 

contaminants controlled by the NPDES permit, pretreatment, and drinking water program

National Commitment

2002 Baseline n/a2005 Commitment n/a2005 Midyear No2005 End-of-Year NoUniverse

20202020Un

2008 Target: By 2008 20

84 

Apply the Best Available Science

National Commitment

2002 Baseline n/a2005 Commitment tbd2005 Midyear Data n/a2005 End-of-Year Work in ProgressUniverse

83

2008 Target: By 2008
Protect Wetlands

Subobjective: (4.3.2) Working with partners, achieve a net increase of acres o

additional focus on biological and functional measures.

2002 Baseline: annual net loss of an estimated 58,000 acres.2005 Commitment: 100,000 2008 Targe2005 Midyear: exempt 2005 End-o

*FY 05 EO

*NOTE: In April of 2004, President Bush announced a new national goal to 

least three million additional acres of wetlands over the next five years.

Strategic Targets:

-- (IV-E) Annually, beginning in FY 2004, work with the U.S. Army Corps Engineers (COE) and other partners to achieve no net loss of wetlands unde

regulatory program.

2005 Commitment: no net loss 2008 Targe2005 Midyear: exempt 2005 End-o

one full yea
Measure Description: Number of States that have achieved overall building capacities in wetland monitoring, regulation, restoration, wamitigation compliance, and partnership building.

Wetlands

2

National Program Manager Comments:

Measure #: IV-WD-1 National O

Reg 1 Reg 2 Reg 3 Reg 4 Reg 5 Reg 6 Reg 7 Re

2002 Baseline 00000002005 Commitment 

2005 Midyear 600000 

2005 End-of-Year 6 0 3 7 0 0 1 Universe 6 2 5 8 6 5 4 

Indicator measure
Measure Description: Number of watershed-based wetlands and str(combined 5-Star and non-5-Star projects) for which EPA has providfinancial and technical assistance. [cumulative projects]

2

National Program Manager Comments:

Measure #: IV-WD-2 National O

Reg 1 Reg 2 Reg 3 Reg 4 Reg 5 Reg 6 Reg 7 Reg 8 

2002 Baseline 29 3 16 14 14 44 4 17 

2005 Commitment 2005 Midyear 46 3 0 0 0 52 

2005 End-of-Ye 63 3 30 39 22 73 6 7 

Universe 

Indicator measure

Wetlands
Measure Description: Number of Tribes that have participated in wand stream corridor projects for which EPA has provided significant (including 104(b)(3) Wetland Program and Five Star restoration progassistance (cumulative) (565 Federally recognized Tribes).

20

National Program Manager Comments:

Measure #: IV-WD-3 National O

Reg 1 Reg 2 Reg 3 Reg 4 Reg 5 Reg 6 Reg 7 Re

2002 Baseline 2 0 n/a 1 2 10 3 2005 Commitment 2 1 n/a 2 5 12 4 2005 Midyear 2 0 n/a 0 2 11 5 2005 End-of-Year 2 0 n/a 2 4 13 6 Universe 10 7 n/a 6 35 66 9 

Target measure

Wetlands
Measure Description: Number of major projects that have been comthat significantly improve the effectiveness of compensatory mitigati

2

National Program Manager Comments:

Measure #: ID-WD-4 National O

Reg 1 Reg 2 Reg 3 Reg 4 Reg 5 Reg 6 Reg 7 Re

2002 Baseline 20 2 6 3 4 1 7 

2005 Commitment 

2005 Midyear 21 2 0 0 4 0 2005 End-of-Year 21 2 11 5 4 0 7 Universe 

Wetlands

Indicator measure
Measure Description: Number of States where wetland condition hthrough biological metrics and assessments.

2

National Program Manager Comments:

Measure #: ID-WD-5 National O

Reg 1 Reg 2 Reg 3 Reg 4 Reg 5 Reg 6 Reg 7 Re

2002 Baseline 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2005 Commitment 1 0 3 1 1 1 1 2005 Midyear 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 2005 End-of-Year 1 0 4 1 1 1 1 Universe 6 2 5 8 6 5 4 

Target measureThis measure is actually showing the number of states on track to be able to show c

condition by 2008. The 2006 PAM has been updated to reflect this.

Wetlands
Protect Mexico Border Water

(Note: No PAMs directly address this subob

Subobjective: (4.2.4) Sustain and restore community health, and preserve the 

them.

2005 Midyear: exempt 2005 End-of-Year: exem

Strategic Targets:

-- (IV-A) Of the water quality standards being exceeded in significant shareyear 2002, the percentage that are achieved.2002 Baseline: TBD 2005 Commitment: TBD 2005 Midyear: exempt 2005 End-of-Year: exempt (measur-- (IV-B) Number of people in the Mexico Border area provided with adequsystems through the Border Environmental Infrastructure Fund (cumulative2002 Baseline: 790 thousand 2005 Commitment: 1,500,000 2005 Midyear: 1,163,000 2005 End-of-Year: 1,163,000
Protect the Great Lakes

Subobjective: (4.3.3) Prevent water pollution and improve the overall aquatic 

of the Great Lakes using the Great Lakes 40-point scale:2002 Baseline: 20 points 2005 Commitment: 21 2005 Mi2005 End-of-Year: 21.9 points

Strategic Targets:

-- (IV-G) Reduce the average concentrations of PCBs in whole lake trout an2002 levels:2005 Commitment: 5% decline 2005 Midyear: N/A 2007 Targe2005 End-of-Year: 6%-- (IV-H) Reduce the average concentrations of toxic chemicals in the air in 2002 levels:2005 Commitment: 7% decline 2005 Midyear: 8.72% 2008 Targe2005 End-of-Year: 7%
-- (IV-I) Restore and delist Areas of Concern within the Great Lakes bas

2002 Baseline: 0 AOCs restored 2005 Commitment: 3 2005 2005 End-of-Year: 0-- (IV-J) Remediate cubic yards of contaminated sediment in the Great L

2002 Baseline: 2.1 million 2005 Commitment: 2.9 2005 

2005 End-of-Year: 3.7 million

Protect the Great Lakes
Great Lakes

Measure #: IV-GL-1 National OMeasure Description: Percentage of all NPDES permitted discharges to the Lakes or mlimits that reflect the Guidance's water quality standards, where applicable.Measure #: IV-GL-2 National OMeasure Description: Each year, complete three sediment remedial actions. [US partn

since 1997.]Measure #: IV-GL-3 National OMeasure Description: Percentage of all CSO permits in the Great Lakes basin that are Policy.

Commitment

2002 Baseline 23%755 (add NY)2005 Commitment 72%2005 Midyear 71%2005 End-of-Year 91%Universe 3,296

2008 Target: 100%

Commitment

2002 Baseline 32005 Commitment 32005 Midyear 02005 End-of-Year 3Universe n/a

20202020U

2008 Target: 3 (annual) 

IV-GL-1 IV-GL-2 
2008 Target: 8

Measure #: IV-GL-4 National OMeasure Description: All Great Lakes States adopt bacteria criteria at least as protectivQuality Criteria for Bacteria. Measure #: IV-GL-5 National OMeasure Description: Percentage of high priority Great Lakes beaches where States anwater quality monitoring and public notification programs that comply with the USEPA 

 Commitment

2002 Baseline 32005 Commitment 42005 Midyear 22005 End-of-Year 6Universe 8

2002 Baseline 2005 Commitment 2005 Midyear 2005 End-of-Year Universe 

IV-GL-4 IV-GL

2008 Target: 95%

Great Lakes
Protect and Restore Chesapeake 

Subobjective: (4.3.4) Prevent water pollution and protect aquatic systems s

aquatic system health of the Chesapeake Bay is improved ansubmerged aquatic vegetation increase.

2002 Baseline: 85,252 acres 2005 Commitment: 9

2005 Midyear: 89,659 2005 End-of-Year: 72

Strategic Targets:

-- (IV-K) Reduction in number of pounds of nitrogen entering the Bay ea

2002 Baseline: 51 million lbs. 2005 Commitment: 74 

2005 Midyear: 62 2005 End-of-Year: 67 million lbs-- (IV-L) Reduction in number of pounds of phosphorus entering the Bay 

levels:2002 Baseline: 8 million lbs. 2005 Commitment: 8.7 

2005 Midyear: 7.8 2005 End-of-Year: 8.4 million lbs-- (IV-M) Reduction in number of tons of sediment entering the Bay each 

2002 Baseline: 0.8 million tons 2005 Commitment: 1.06 

2005 Midyear: 0.8 2005 End-of-Year: 0.9 million ton
Chesapeake Bay

Measure #: IV-CB-1 National OMeasure Description: Percentage of wastewater flow to the Chesapeake Bay treated by 

(BNR). (cumulative)

Measure #: IV-CB-2 National OMeasure Description: Miles of streambank and shoreline restored with riparian forest b

Commitment

2002 Baseline 48%2005 Commitment 60%2005 Midyear 56%2005 End-of-Year 56%Universe total wastewater flow

2008 Target: 69%

2002 Baseline 2005 Commitment 2005 Midyear 2005 End-of-Year Universe 

2008 Target: 7,000

IV-CB-1 IV-
Protect the Gulf of Mexico

Subobjective: (4.3.5) Prevent water pollution and protect aquatic systems so 

health of coastal waters of the Gulf of Mexico is improved.

2005 Midyear: exempt 2005 End-of-Year: exem

Strategic Target: 

-- (IV- N) Prevent water pollution and improve the overall aquatic ecosyste

Gulf of Mexico by 0.2 on the “good/fair/poor” scale of the National Coastal 

system in which 1 is poor and 5 is good:

Baseline: 1.9 2005 Commitment: 2.4 2008 Targe

2005 Midyear: 2.4 2005 End-of-Year: 2.4-- (IV- O) Reduce releases of nutrients throughout the Mississippi River Bahypoxic zone in the Gulf of Mexico:Baseline: 1996-2000 running average size is 14,128 km22005 Commitment: 14,128 km2 2015 Targe2005 Midyear: 14,128 km2 2005 End-o
Gulf of Mexico

Measure #: IV-GM-1 National O

Measure Description: Percentage of the impaired segments in the 12 priority coastal aris restored to levels that meet state water quality standards. Measure #: IV-GM-2 National O

Measure Description: Number of additional acres important coastal and marine habitatprotected, above improvements accomplished through 2003. (USGS 2000 baseline for ahabitats - 3,769,370 acres)Measure #: IV-GM-3 National O

Measure Description: Implement integrated bi-national (U.S. and Mexican Border StatState and coastal community efforts to manage harmful algal blooms (HABs).

National Commitment

2002 Baseline 02005 Commitment 8% (28 segments)2005 Midyear2005 End-of-Year Data unavailable in 05Universe 354 impaired segments

2008 Target: 20% (71 segments)

Commitment

2002 Baseline 02005 Commitment 11,0002005 Midyear 15,995.502005 End-of-Year 15,995.50Universe 3.7 million acres

200200200200Univ

2008 Target: 20,000 2008 

IV-GM-1 IV-GM-2 
2008 Target: By 2007, 0.121/million

Measure #: IV-GM-4 National O

Measure Description: Reduce the rate of shellfish-borne Vibrio vulnificus illnesses caucommercially-harvested raw or undercooked oysters from the average illness rate for the 

Measure #: IV-GM-5 National O

Measure Description: Continued support for the Lower Mississippi River Sub Basin CHypoxia Action Plan), select a project watershed in each of the states in the Lower MS R

in selected watersheds within the Lower Mississippi River Basin to reduce nitrogen load

 Commitment

2002 Baseline .303/million2005 Commitment 0.194 million2005 Midyear .16 million2005 End-of-Year .16 millionUniverse 70,637,188 avg pop

2002 Baseline 2005 Commitment 2005 Midyear 2005 End-of-Year Universe

2008 Target: By 2006, e

IV-GM-4 IV-GM

Gulf of Mexico