alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The American Oak Leather Co. *vs.*The Evans Bell and Clark Co.

May Term, 1897.

Present: Ross, C. J., Rowell, Tyler, Munson, Start and Thompson, JJ.

*Plea to the Jurisdiction.*

When there is no personal service upon the defendant and jurisdiction depends upon the attachment, a plea to the jurisdiction which alleges that the defendant had at the time of the attachment “no right, title or interest in or to any of the attached property,” is insufficient on demurrer because it fails to negative the possibility that the property may have been in the defendant’s possession under circumstances which would make it attachable as the defendant’s, though not his in fact.

Assumpsit. Plea to the jurisdiction. Demurrer to the plea. Heard at the December Term, 1896, Caledonia County, Taft, J., presiding.

Demurrer overruled *pro forma*and plea adjudged sufficient. The defendant excepted.

The defendant is a foreign corporation. The officer’s return showed service by attachment of seventy-six cases of boots and shoes as the property of the defendant and a copy of the writ with a list of the property attached left in the hands of one H. A. Bartlett at the place where the property was attached, “he having the care and custody of the property and the defendant being without this State and having no clerk or other principal officer or stockholder resident of this State and no known agent or attorney resident of this State with whom” said copy could be left. The cause was duly entered and continued for notice by publication, and the order of notice was complied with.

There was a special appearance for the purpose of the plea only and a plea filed referring to the writ, declaration and officer’s return and alleging that no other service and no other attachment had been made. Then followed the averment “that the defendant had not at the time when *119said attachment was made and has not since had any right, title or interest in or to any of the property attached in said cause.”

*Harry Blodgett*for the plaintiff.

*W. P. Stafford*for the defendant.

Munson, J.

The dilatory plea in this case is treated by counsel on both sides as a plea to the jurisdiction. It is not necessary to inquire as to its precise character, for it is defective in one particular, whatever its character. It fails to exclude the possibility that the chattels were in the possession of the defendant under circumstances that made them attachable as its property. They were so attachable if they had previously been the property of the defendant and had been sold to another without change of possession. The defendant might have parted with all its right, title and interest in and to the property, by a sale valid as between the parties, and still be held the owner for the purposes of attachment. The plea does not present an issue which if disposed of upon traverse would be determinative of the question raised. All the facts alleged might be true, and yet the attachment of the property give the court cognizance of the suit.

*Judgment reversed, demitrrer sustained, plea adjudged insufficient, and cause remanded.*
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Prosperity Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2010
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David Hollaway, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
operating results of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/David Hollaway      
|David Hollaway         
|Chief Financial Officer
|May 10, 2010
§ 1214.160 Communications. ( a ) The agency shall take appropriate steps to ensure effective communication with applicants, participants, personnel of other Federal entities, and members of the public. ( 1 ) The agency shall furnish appropriate auxiliary aids where necessary to afford an individual with handicaps an equal opportunity to participate in, and enjoy the benefits of, a program or activity conducted by the agency. ( i ) In determining what type of auxiliary aid will be provided, the agency shall give primary consideration to the requests of the individual with handicaps.
( ii ) The agency need not provide individually prescribed devices, readers for personal use or study, or other devices of a personal nature.
( 2 ) Where the agency communicates with applicants and beneficiaries by telephone, telecommunication devices for deaf persons (TDD's) or equally effective telecommunication systems shall be used to communicate with persons with impaired hearing.
( b ) The agency shall ensure that interested persons, including persons with impaired vision or hearing, can obtain information as to the existence and location of accessible services, activities, and facilities.
( c ) The agency shall provide a sign at a primary entrance to each of its inaccessible facilities, directing users to a location at which they can obtain information about accessible facilities. The international symbol for accessibility shall be displayed at each primary entrance to each accessible facility.
( d ) This section does not require the agency to take any action that it can demonstrate would result in a fundamental alteration in the nature of a program or activity or in undue financial and administrative burdens. In those circumstances where agency personnel believe that the proposed action would fundamentally alter the program or activity or would result in undue financial and administrative burdens, the agency has the burden of proving that compliance with § 1214.160 would result in such alteration or burdens. The decision that compliance would result in such alteration or burdens must be made by the agency head or his or her designee after considering all agency resources available for use in the funding and operation of the conducted program or activity and must be accompanied by a written statement of the reasons for reaching that conclusion. If an action required to comply with this section would result in such alteration or such burdens, the agency shall take any other action that would not result in such an alteration or such burdens but would nevertheless ensure that, to the maximum extent possible, individuals with handicaps receive the benefits and services of the program or activity.
SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

ONE HUNDRED SECOND CONGRESS 

FIRST SESSION { 

Convened January 3, 1991 

Adjourned January 3, 1992 

Convened January 3, 1992 

SECOND SESSION { 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Thursday, February 6, 1992 

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF WALTER J. STEWART, 

SECRETARY OF THE SENATE 

By Gerald A. Hackett, Executive Clerk 
1 

TREATIES 

Calendar Treaty Subject Reported 

No. Doc. No. Bv 

1 EX. B., Two Related Protocols to the Convention for Feb 5 91 Reported favorably 

95-1 the Unification of Certain Rules Relating by Mr. Pell, Committee on 

to International Carriage by Air, as Foreign Relations, with a 

Amended (Montreal Aviation Protocols No. 3 resolution of advice and 

and 4). consent to ratification 

with provisos. (Printed 

report--Ex. Rept. 102-1 

together with minority 

views). 
Calendar Message 

No. No. 

* 433 760-1 

* 474 760-2 

* 487 788 

2 

NOMINATIONS 

Nominee, Office, And Predecessor 

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN 

SERVICES 

Arnold R. Tompkins, of Maryland, to be an 

Assistant Secretary of Health and Human 

Services. 

Arnold R. Tompkins, of Maryland, to be 

Chief Financial Officer, Department of 

Health and Human Services. 

[NEW REPORTS] 

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 

G. 0. Griffith, Jr., of Mississippi, to be 

Assistant Secretary for Intergovernmental 

and Interagency Affairs, Department of 

Education. vice Michelle Easton. 

Reported 

Bv 

Nov 20, 91 Mr. Bentsen. 

Committee on Finance, 

without printed report 

Nov 20. 91 Mr. Bentsen, 

Committee on Finance, 

without printed report 

Committee on Governmental 

Affairs discharged Nov 25 

91. 

Feb 5, 92 Mr. Kennedy, 

Committee on Labor and 

Human Resources. without 

Printed renort 

*Signifies nomtnee's commitment to respond to requests to appear and testify before any duly 

constituted committee of the Senate.
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT C UNWU JIANG, Pe titione r, v. LORETTA E. LYNC H, Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R

e sponde nt . No. 13-73005 Age n c y No. A088-289-067 M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Subm itte d Fe brua

ry 24, 2016 * * B e fore : LEAVY, FER NANDEZ, a

nd R AW LINSON, C irc uit Judge s. C unwu Jia

ng, a native and c i tiz e n

of C h ina , pe titions for re vie w of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a l s’ orde r dism issing his a ppe a l from

an im m igration judge ’ s de c ision de ny ing his a

pplic ation for a sy l um

and withholding of re

m ova l. Our jurisdic tion is governe d by 8 U.S.C . § 1252. W e re vie w for substa ntia l e vide nc e 

# FIL ED FEB 29 2016 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).the a ge nc y ’ s fa c tua l findings, a p ply ing thesta

nda rds gove rning a dve rse c re d ibility de te rm i nations c re ate d

by the REAL ID Ac t. S

hre s tha v . Holde r , 590 F.3d 1034, 1039-40 (9th C ir. 2010). W e de ny in pa rt a n d dismiss in pa

rt the pe tition for re vie w. Eve n if Jia

ng’ s a sy lum

c la im we re tim e ly , substa

ntia l e vide nc e supports the a ge nc y ’ s a dve rse c re dibility de te rm i nation ba s e d on om issions from Jia ng’ s a nd his wife ’ s sta

te m e nts a s to thec irc um sta nc e s of the fam ily

pla nning offic ia ls’ 2006 visit whe n the y

took Jia ng’ s wife to unde rgo a

n a bortion. Se e id. at 1048 (a dve rse c re d ibility

de te rm inat ion wa s re a sona ble unde r the REAL ID Ac t’ s tota lity of the c irc um s ta nc e s sta nda rd); se e also Zamanov

v . Holde r , 649 F.3d 969, 973-74 (9th C ir. 2011) (upholding a

dve rse c re dibility

de te rm ination ba se d

in pa rt on om issions whic h “ we nt to thec ore of [the pe titione r’ s] fe ar of politic a l pe rse c ution” ). W e la c k jurisdic tion to c onside r Jia ng’ s une xha

uste d e xpla

nation for the se om issions. Se e Barron v . Ashc roft , 358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th C ir. 2004). In thea bse nc e of c re d ible t e s tim ony , Jia

ng’ s a sy lum

an d withholding of re

m ova l c la im s fa i l. Se e Farah v . Ashc roft , 348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th C ir. 2003). The 90-da

y sta y of proc e e dings gra

nte d on Se pte m

b e r 25, 2015, ha s e xpire d. R e sponde nt’ s m otion to lift the sta y is de nie d a s m oot. PE T IT IO N FO R RE V IE WDE NIE D in par t; DISM ISSE D in par t. 1 3 - 7 3 0 0 5 2
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Yak Communications Inc. (the
Company) Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A for the nine months ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Margaret Noble, principal financial officer of the
Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1). | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2). | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |     |  |                            
|------------------ |  | --- |  | ---------------------------
|Date: May 31, 2005 |  | By: |  | /s/ Margaret Noble         
|                   |  |     |  | Margaret Noble             
|                   |  |     |  | Principal Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 14 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. CON. RES. 14

    Expressing the sense of Congress supporting the State of Israel.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 18, 2023

  Mr. Cotton (for himself, Mr. Boozman, Mr. Hagerty, Mr. Daines, Mr. 
 Grassley, Mr. Hoeven, Mr. Graham, Mr. Scott of Florida, Mr. Schmitt, 
Mr. Cramer, Mr. Braun, Mr. Tillis, Mr. Vance, Ms. Murkowski, Mr. Cruz, 
Mrs. Capito, Mrs. Britt, Mr. Crapo, Mrs. Blackburn, Mr. Scott of South 
 Carolina, Mr. Kennedy, Ms. Ernst, Mrs. Hyde-Smith, Mr. Barrasso, Mr. 
    Sullivan, Mrs. Fischer, Mr. Cornyn, Mr. Rubio, and Mr. Cassidy) 
 submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to 
                   the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
    Expressing the sense of Congress supporting the State of Israel.

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That it is the sense of Congress that--
            (1) the State of Israel is not a racist or apartheid State;
            (2) Congress rejects all forms of antisemitism and 
        xenophobia; and
            (3) the United States will always be a staunch partner and 
        supporter of Israel.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 57 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. J. RES. 57

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
  United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of the 
  Treasury relating to ``Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery 
                                Funds''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 1, 2024

  Mr. Schmitt (for himself, Mr. Marshall, Mr. Cotton, Mr. Braun, Mrs. 
 Blackburn, Mr. Scott of Florida, Mr. Hagerty, Ms. Ernst, Mr. Johnson, 
 and Ms. Lummis) introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
          read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
  United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of the 
  Treasury relating to ``Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery 
                                Funds''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Department of the Treasury relating to 
``Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds'' (88 Fed. Reg. 
80584 (November 20, 2023)), and such rule shall have no force or 
effect.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6108
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus WILLIAM FELIX, a/k/a Willio Mode, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem. William L. Osteen, Sr., District Judge. (CR-93-140, CA-96-288-6) Submitted: July 24, 1997 Decided: August 6, 1997 Before HAMILTON, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William Felix, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Alexander Weinman, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion seeking to alter or amend the judgment denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994) (current version at 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997)). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion andfind no abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Felix , Nos. CR-93-140; CA-96-288-6 (M.D.N.C. Dec.12, 1996). See Lindh v. Murphy , 521 U.S. ___, 1997 WL 338568 (U.S. June 23, 1997) (No. 96-6298). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 100 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. J. RES. 100

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental 
 Protection Agency relating to ``New Source Performance Standards for 
  the Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry and National 
   Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for the Synthetic 
 Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry and Group I & II Polymers and 
                           Resins Industry''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 20, 2024

  Mr. Kennedy (for himself, Mr. Braun, Mr. Cassidy, Mr. Lankford, and 
 Mrs. Blackburn) introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
  read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public 
                                 Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental 
 Protection Agency relating to ``New Source Performance Standards for 
  the Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry and National 
   Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for the Synthetic 
 Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry and Group I & II Polymers and 
                           Resins Industry''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to ``New 
Source Performance Standards for the Synthetic Organic Chemical 
Manufacturing Industry and National Emission Standards for Hazardous 
Air Pollutants for the Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing 
Industry and Group I & II Polymers and Resins Industry'' (89 Fed. Reg. 
42932 (May 16, 2024)), and such rule shall have no force or effect.
                                 <all>
```
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Robert Fraser of Lions Gate Lighting Corp.,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | the annual report on Form 10-K of Lions Gate Lighting
      Corp. for the period ended February 28, 2010 (the Report) fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934; and
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Lions Gate Lighting Corp.                                                                 

Dated: April 26, 2010

| | /s/
      Robert Fraser                                   
| | ----------------------------------------------------------
| | Robert Fraser, President and Chief Executive
      Officer
| | (Principal Executive Officer)                             

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Lions Gate
Lighting Corp. and will be retained by Lions Gate Lighting Corp. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
§ 158.603 Notice to responsible entities. If HHS learns of a potential violation described in § 158.602 of this subpart or if a State informs HHS of a potential violation prior to imposing any civil monetary penalty HHS must provide written notice to the issuer, to include the following: ( a ) Describe the potential violation.
( b ) Provide 30 days from the date of the notice for the responsible entity to respond and to provide additional information to refute an alleged violation.
( c ) State that a civil monetary penalty may be assessed if the allegations are not, as determined by HHS, refuted.
§ 1607.6 Waiver. ( a ) Upon application, the president shall waive the requirements of this part to permit a recipient that was funded under § 222(a)(3) of the Economic Opportunity Act of 1964 and, on July 25, 1974, had a majority of persons who were not attorneys on its governing body, to continue such nonattorney majority.
( b ) Upon application, the president may waive any of the requirements of this part which are not mandated by applicable law if a recipient demonstrates that it cannot comply with them because of: ( 1 ) The nature of the population, legal community or area served; or
( 2 ) Special circumstances, including but not limited to, conflicting requirements of the recipient's other major funding source(s) or State law.
( c ) A recipient seeking a waiver under § 1607.6(b)(1) shall demonstrate that it has made diligent efforts to comply with the requirements of this part.
( d ) As a condition of granting a waiver under § 1607.6(b)(2) of any of the requirements imposed upon governing bodies by § 1607.3, the president shall require that a recipient have a policy body with a membership composed and appointed in the manner prescribed by § 1607.3. Such policy body shall be subject to the meeting requirements of § 1607.4(a) and its attorney members shall be subject to the restrictions on compensation contained in § 1607.5. The policy body shall have such specific powers and responsibilities as the President determines are necessary to enable it to formulate and enforce policy with respect to the services provided under the recipient's LSC grant or contract.