Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 225 / Wednesday, November 22, 2006 / Notices 67641 

copy from the Consent Decree Library, 

please enclose a check in the amount of 

$5.00 (25 cents per page reproduction 

cost) payable to the U.S. Treasury. 

W. Benjamin Fisherow, 

Deputy Chief, Environmental Enforcement 

Section, Environment and Natural Resources 

Division. 

[FR Doc. 06–9353 Filed 11–21–06; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–15–M 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Notice of Lodging Proposed Consent 

Decree 

In accordance with Departmental 

Policy, 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby 

given that a proposed Consent Decree in 

United States v. Toy R. Arnett, Jr., et al., 

No. 3:05cv270–RS, was lodged with the 

United States District Court for the 

Northern District of Florida on 

November 14, 2006. 

This proposed Consent Decree 

concerns a complaint filed by the 

United States against Toy R. Arnett, Jr., 

Rena M. Arnett, the Nesius Family 

Limited Partnership, Rick D. Nesius, 

Shannon K. Nesius, and Faith Assembly 

Christian Church of Miramar Beach, 

Inc., pursuant to Sections 301 and 404 

of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1311 

and 1344, with respect to Defendants’

alleged violations of the Clean Water 

Act at two sites by discharging 

pollutants into waters of the United 

States without or in violation of a 

permit. The proposed Consent Decree 

resolves these allegations by requiring 

the restoration of portions of the 

wetlands at issue, mitigation, and the 

payment of civil penalties. The 

Department of Justice will accept 

written comments relating to this 

proposed Consent Decree for thirty (30) 

days from the date of publication of this 

Notice. Please address comments to 

Martin F. McDermott, United States 

Department of Justice, Environment and 

Natural Resources Division, 

Environmental Defense Section, P.O. 

Box 23986, Washington, DC 20026–3986 

and refer to United States v. Toy R. 

Arnett, Jr., et al., DJ#90–5–1–1–17459. 

The proposed Consent Decree may be 

examined at the Clerk’s Office, United 

States District Court for the Northern 

District of Florida, United States 

Courthouse, 1 North Palafox Street, 

Pensacola, Florida 32502. In addition, 

the proposed Consent Decree may be 

viewed at http://www.usdoj.gov/enrd/ 

open.html. 

Stephen Samuels, 

Assistant Chief, Environmental Defense 

Section, Environment & Natural Resources 

Division. 

[FR Doc. 06–9352 Filed 11–21–06; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–15–M 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree 

Under the Comprehensive 

Environmental Response, 

Compensation, and Liability Act 

Under 42 U.S.C. 9622(d)(2) and 28 

CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on 

November 3, 2006, 2006, a proposed 

Consent Decree in United States and 

California Department of Toxic 

Substances Control v. Rathon Corp., 

Civil Action Number 06–07048, was 

lodged with the United States District 

Court for the Central District of 

California. 

The consent decree resolves certain 

claims brought by the United States, on 

behalf of the United States 

Environmental Protection Agency 

(‘‘EPA’’), and the California Department 

of Toxic Substances Control (‘‘DTSC’’) 

under Sections 106 and 107 of the 

Comprehensive Environmental 

Response, Compensation, and Liability 

Act (‘‘CERCLA’’), 42 U.S.C. 9606 and 

9607, and Section 7003 of the Resource 

Conservation and Recovery Act, as 

amended (‘‘RCRA’’), 42 U.S.C. 6973, for 

the performance of response actions, 

and for the reimbursement of response 

costs incurred and to be incurred by 

EPA and DTSC, in connection with the 

release and threatened release of 

hazardous substances at the Puente 

Valley Operable Unit of the San Gabriel 

Valley Area 4 Superfund Site (‘‘Site’’) in 

Los Angeles County, California. 

The consent decree resolves 

defendant’s liability for past costs, 

future costs, and work associated with 

the remedial action required for the Site 

set forth in EPA’s 1998 Interim Record 

of Decision and the 2005 Explanation of 

Significant Differences. 

The Department of Justice will 

receive, for a period of thirty (30) days 

from the date of this publication, 

comments relating to the Consent 

Decree. Comments should be addressed 

to the Assistant Attorney General, 

Environment and Natural Resources 

Division, P.O. Box 7611, U.S. 

Department of Justice, Washington, DC 

20044–7611, and should refer to United 

States v. Rathon Corp., DOJ Ref. #90–

11–2–354/24. Commenters may request 

an opportunity for a public meeting in 

the affected area, in accordance with 

Section 7003(d) of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. 

6973(d). 

The Consent Decree may be examined 

at the Office of the United States 

Attorney, 300 North Los Angeles Street, 

Los Angeles, California 90012, and the 

Region IX Office of the Environmental 

Protection Agency, 75 Hawthorne 

Street, San Francisco, CA 94105. During 

the public comment period, the Consent 

Decree may also be examined on the 

following Department of Justice Web 

site: http://www.usdoj.gov/enrd/ 

Consent_Decrees.html. A copy of the 

Consent Decree may also be obtained by 

mail from the Consent Decree Library, 

P.O. Box 7611, U.S. Department of 

Justice, Washington, DC 20044–7611, or 

by faxing or e-mailing a request to Tonia 

Fleetwood, tonia.fleetwood@usdoj.gov, 

Fax No. (202) 514–0097, phone 

confirmation number (202) 514–1547. 

To obtain a copy of the Consent Decree 

from the Consent Decree Library, 

excluding the numerous pages of 

attachments, please enclose a check in 

the amount of $9.50 (25 cents per page 

reproduction cost) payable to the U.S. 

Treasury. 

Henry Friedman, 

Assistant Section Chief, Environmental 

Enforcement Section, Environment and 

Natural Resources Division. 

[FR Doc. 06–9351 Filed 11–21–06; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–15–M 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree 

Under the Comprehensive 

Environmental Response, 

Compensation, and Liability Act 

Under 42 U.S.C. 9622(d)(2) and 28 

CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on 

November 2, 2006, a proposed Consent 

Decree in United States and California 

Department of Toxic Substances Control 

v. Saint-Gobain Corporation, Civil Act 

Number 06–07047, was lodged with the 

United States District Court for the 

Central District of California. 

The consent decree resolves certain 

claims brought by the United States, on 

behalf of the United States 

Environmental Protection Agency 

(‘‘EPA’’), and the California Department 

of Toxic Substances Control (‘‘DTSC’’) 

under Sections 106 and 107 of the 

Comprehensive Environmental 

Response, Compensation, and Liability 

Act (‘‘CERCLA’’), 42 U.S.C. 9606 and 

9607, and Section 7003 of the Resource 

Conservation and Recovery Act, as 

amended (‘‘RCRA’’), 42 U.S.C. 6973, for 

the performance of response actions, 

and for the reimbursement of response 


pwalker on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
67642 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 225 / Wednesday, November 22, 2006 / Notices 

costs incurred and to be incurred by 

EPA and DTSC, in connection with the 

release and threatened release of 

hazardous substances at the Puente 

Valley Operable Unit of the San Gabriel 

Valley Area 4 Superfund Site (‘‘Site’’) in 

Los Angeles County, California. 

The consent decree resolves 

defendant’s liability for past costs, 

future costs, and work associated with 

the remedial action required for the Site 

set forth in EPA’s 1998 Interim Record 

of Decision and the 2005 Explanation of 

Significant Differences. 

The Department of Justice will 

receive, for a period of thirty (30) days 

from the date of this publication, 

comments relating to the Consent 

Decree. Comments should be addressed 

to the Assistant Attorney General, 

Environment and Natural Resources 

Division, P.O. Box 7611, U.S. 

Department of Justice, Washington, DC 

20044–7611, and should refer to United 

States v. Saint-Gobain Corporation, DOJ 

Ref. #90–11–2–354/23. Commenters 

may request an opportunity for a public 

meeting in the affected area, in 

accordance with Section 7003(d) of 

RCRA, 42 U.S.C. 6973(d). 

The Consent Decree may be examined 

at the Office of the United States 

Attorney, 300 North Los Angeles Street, 

Los Angeles, CA 90012, and the Region 

IX Office of the Environmental 

Protection Agency, 75 Hawthorne 

Street, San Francisco, CA 94105. During 

the public comment period, the Consent 

Decree may also be examined on the 

following Department of Justice Web 

site: http://www.usdoj.gov/enrd/ 

Consent_Decrees.html. A copy of the 

Consent Decree may also be obtained by 

mail from the Consent Decree Library, 

P.O. Box 7611, U.S. Department of 

Justice, Washington, DC 20044–7611, or 

by faxing or e-mailing a request to Tonia 

Fleetwood, tonia.fleetwood@usdoj.gov, 

Fax No. (202) 514–0097, phone 

confirmation number (202) 514–1547. 

To obtain a copy of the Consent Decree 

from the Consent Decree Library, 

excluding the numerous pages of 

attachments, please enclose a check in 

the amount of $9.25 (25 cents per page 

reproduction cost) payable to the U.S. 

Treasury. 

Henry Friedman, 

Assistant Section Chief, Environmental 

Enforcement Section, Environment and 

Natural Resources Division. 

[FR Doc. 06–9350 Filed 11–21–06; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–15–M 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Antitrust Division 

Notice Pursuant to the National 

Cooperative Research and Production 

Act of 1993—AAF Association, Inc. 

Notice is hereby given that, on 

October 6, 2006, pursuant to Section 

6(a) of the National Cooperative 

Research and Production Act of 1993, 

15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), AAF 

Association, Inc. has filed written 

notifications simultaneously with the 

Attorney General and the Federal Trade 

Commission disclosing changes in its 

membership. The notifications were 

filed for the purpose of extending the 

Act’s provisions limiting the recovery of 

antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages 

under specified circumstances. 

Specifically, Agile Broadcast, London, 

United Kingdom; and Mediaware 

International, Inc., Arlington, VA have 

been added as parties to this venture. 

Also, BAE Systems, San Diego, CA; and 

Seachange International, Maynard, MA 

have withdrawn as parties to this 

venture. 

No other changes have been made in 

either the membership or planned 

activity of the group research project. 

Membership in this group research 

project remains open, and AAF 

Association, Inc. intends to file 

additional written notification 

disclosing all changes in membership. 

On March 28, 2000, AAF Association, 

Inc. filed its original notification 

pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The 

Department of Justice published a notice 

in the Federal Register pursuant to 

Section 6(b) of the Act on June 29, 2000 

(65 FR 40127). 

The last notification was filed with 

the Department on June 21, 2006. A 

notice was published in the Federal 

Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the 

Act on July 12, 2006 (71 FR 39364). 

Patricia A. Brink, 

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust 

Division. 

[FR Doc. 06–9334 Filed 11–21–06; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–11–M 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Antitrust Division 

Notice Pursuant to the National 

Cooperative Research and Production 

Act of 1993—Mobile Enterprise 

Alliance, Inc. 

Notice is hereby given that, on 

October 27, 2006, pursuant to Section 

6(a) of the National Cooperative 

Research and Production Act of 1993, 

15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), 

Mobile Enterprise Alliance, Inc. has 

filed written notifications 

simultaneously with the Attorney 

General and the Federal Trade 

Commission disclosing changes in its 

membership. The notifications were 

filed for the purpose of extending the 

Act’s provisions limiting the recovery of 

antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages 

under specified circumstances. 

Specifically, Antenna Software, Jersey 

City, NJ has been added as a party to 

this venture. Also Appear Networks AB, 

Stockholm, SWEDEN has withdrawn as 

a party to this venture. 

No other changes have been made in 

either the membership or planned 

activity of the group research project. 

Membership in this group research 

project remains open, and Mobile 

Enterprise Alliance, Inc. intends to file 

additional written notifications 

disclosing all changes in membership. 

On June 24, 2004, Mobile Enterprise 

Alliance, Inc. filed its original 

notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of 

the Act. The Department of Justice 

published a notice in the Federal 

Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the 

Act on July 23, 2004 (69 FR 44062). 

The last notification was filed with 

the Department on September 14, 2006. 

A notice was published in the Federal 

Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the 

Act on October 20, 2006 (71 FR 62013). 

Patricia A. Brink, 

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust 

Division. 

[FR Doc. 06–9336 Filed 11–21–06; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–11–M 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Antitrust Division 

Notice Pursuant to the National 

Cooperative Research and Production 

Act of 1993—PXI Systems Alliance, 

Inc. 

Notice is hereby given that, on 

October 5, 2006, pursuant to Section 

6(a) of the National Cooperative 

Research and Production Act of 1993, 

15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), PXI 

systems Alliance, Inc. has filed written 

notifications simultaneously with the 

Attorney General and the Federal Trade 

Commission disclosing changes in its 

membership. The notifications were 

filed for the purpose of extending the 

Act’s provisions limiting the recovery of 

antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages 

under specified circumstances. 

Specifically, TZ Mikroelectronik, 

Geoppingen, GERMANY; Tabor 

Electronics, Ltd., Tel Hana, ISRAEL; 


pwalker on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES