alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1355.42 Reporting populations. ( a ) *Out-of-home care reporting population.* ( 1 ) A title IV-E agency must report a child of any age who is in out-of-home care for more than 24 hours. The out-of-home care reporting population includes a child in the following situations: ( i ) A child in foster care as defined in § 1355.20.
( ii ) A child on whose behalf title IV-E foster care maintenance payments are made and who is under the placement and care responsibility of another public agency or an Indian tribe, tribal organization or consortium with which the title IV-E agency has an agreement pursuant to section 472(a)(2)(B)(ii) of the Act.
( iii ) A child who runs away or whose whereabouts are unknown at the time the child is placed under the placement and care responsibility of the title IV-E agency.
( 2 ) Once a child enters the out-of-home care reporting population, the child remains in the out-of-home care reporting population through the end of the report period in which the title IV-E agency's placement and care responsibility ends, or a child's title IV-E foster care maintenance payment pursuant to a title IV-E agreement per section 472(a)(2) of the Act ends, regardless of any subsequent living arrangement.
( b ) *Adoption and guardianship assistance reporting population.* ( 1 ) The title IV-E agency must include in the adoption and guardianship assistance reporting population any child who is: ( i ) In a finalized adoption under a title IV-E adoption assistance agreement pursuant to section 473(a) of the Act with the reporting title IV-E agency that is or was in effect at some point during the current report period; or
( ii ) In a legal guardianship under a title IV-E guardianship assistance agreement pursuant to section 473(d) of the Act with the reporting title IV-E agency that is or was in effect at some point during the current report period.
( 2 ) A child remains in the adoption or guardianship assistance reporting population through the end of the report period in which the title IV-E agreement ends or is terminated.
[81 FR 90569, Dec. 14, 2016]
Editorial Note on Part 1304
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1304 appear at 89 FR 67817, Aug. 21, 2024.

§ 1304.20 Selection among applicants. ( a ) In selecting an agency to be designated to provide Head Start Preschool, Early Head Start, Migrant or Seasonal Head Start or Tribal Head Start Preschool or Early Head Start services, the responsible HHS official will consider the applicable criteria at section 641(d) of the Head Start Act and any other criteria outlined in the funding opportunity announcement.
( b ) In competitions to replace or potentially replace a grant recipient the responsible HHS official will also consider the extent to which the applicant supports continuity for participating children, the community and the continued employment of effective, well qualified personnel.
( c ) In competitions to replace or potentially replace a current grant recipient, the responsible HHS official will give priority to applicants that have demonstrated capacity in providing effective, comprehensive, and well-coordinated early childhood education and development services and programs to children and their families.
[81 FR 61412, Sept. 6, 2016, as amended at 89 FR 67818, Aug. 21, 2024]
§ 153.230 Calculation of reinsurance payments made under the national contribution rate. ( a ) *Eligibility for reinsurance payments under the national reinsurance parameters.* A health insurance issuer of a reinsurance-eligible plan becomes eligible for reinsurance payments from contributions collected under the national contribution rate when its claims costs for an individual enrollee's covered benefits in a benefit year exceed the national attachment point.
( b ) *National reinsurance payment parameters.* The national reinsurance payment parameters for each benefit year commencing in 2014 and ending in 2016 set forth in the annual HHS notice of benefit and payment parameters for each applicable benefit year will apply with respect to reinsurance payments made from contributions received under the national contribution rate.
( c ) *National reinsurance payments.* Each reinsurance payment made from contributions received under the national contribution rate will be calculated as the product of the national coinsurance rate multiplied by the health insurance issuer's claims costs for an individual enrollee's covered benefits that the health insurance issuer incurs in the applicable benefit year between the national attachment point and the national reinsurance cap.
( d ) *Uniform adjustment to national reinsurance payments.* If HHS determines that all reinsurance payments requested under the national payment parameters from all reinsurance-eligible plans in all States for a benefit year will not be equal to the amount of all reinsurance contributions collected for reinsurance payments under the national contribution rate in all States for an applicable benefit year, HHS will determine a uniform pro rata adjustment to be applied to all such requests for reinsurance payments for all States. Each applicable reinsurance entity, or HHS on behalf of a State, must reduce or increase the reinsurance payment amounts for the applicable benefit year by any adjustment required under this paragraph (d).
[78 FR 15526, Mar. 11, 2013, as amended at 78 FR 66655, Nov. 6, 2013; 79 FR 13835, Mar. 11, 2014]
Federal Election Commission
 

Freedom of Information Act
 

Backlog Reduction Goals
 

Requests 

Fiscal 

Year 

Number of 

Pending Requests 

at Beginning of 

FY 

Estimated 

Number of 

Requests 

Incoming During 

FY 

Agency's Goal 

for Number of 

Requests to be 

Processed 

During FY I 

Agency's Goal for 

Number of Requests 

Pending Beyond 

Statutory Time 

Period (i.e., Backlog) 

at End ofFY 

2008 

22 116 132 6 

Fiscal 

Year 

Projected Number 

of Requests 

Pending Beyond 

Statutory Time 

Period (Backlog) 

at Beginning of 

FY 

Estimated 

Number of 

Requests 

Incoming During 

FY 

Agency's Goal 

for Number of 

Requests to be 

Processed 

During FY 

Agency's Goal for 

Number of Requests 

Pending Beyond 

Statutory Time 

Period (Backlog) at 

End ofFY 

2009 

6 116 122 0 

2010 

0 116 116 0
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense.

# ACTION:

 Notice of closed meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Missile Defense Advisory Committee will meet in closed session on November 28-29, 2006, in Washington, DC.

The mission of the Missile Defense Advisory Committee is to provide the Department of Defense advice on all matters relating to missile defense, including system development, technology, program maturity and readiness of configurations of the Ballistic Missile Defense System (BMDS) to enter the acquisition process. At this meeting, the Committee will conduct classified discussions on capability-based acquisition.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Col. David R. Wolf, Designed Federal Official (DFO) at                         *david.wolf@mda.mil,*                         phone/voice mail (703) 695-6438, or mail at 7100 Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-7100.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

In accordance with Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Pub. L. 92-463, as amended (5 U.S.C. app. II), it has been determined that this Missile Defense Advisory Committee meeting concerns matters listed in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1) and that, accordingly, the meeting will be closed to the public.

Dated: October 30, 2006.

L.M. Bynum,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Office, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 06-9046 Filed 11-2-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-M
SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

ONE HUNDRED FIRST CONGRESS 

FIRST SESSION { 

Convened January 3, 1989 

Adjourned November 22, 1989 

Convened January 23, 1990 

SECOND SESSION { 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Monday, May 14, 1990 

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF WALTER J.STEWART, 

SECRETARY OF THE SENATE 

By Gerald A. Hackett, Executive Clerk 
1 

NOMINATIONS 

Calendar Message Nominee, Office, And Predecessor Reported 

No. No. Bv 

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD 

* 386 576 Clifford R. Oviatt, Jr., of Virginia, to be Oct 4, 89 Mr. Kennedy, 

a Member of the National Labor Relations Committee on Labor and 

Board for the remainder of the term Human Resources, without 

expiring August 27, 1993, vice Wilford W. printed report. 

Johansen, resigned. 

* 389 771 Dennis M. Devaney, of Maryland, to be a Do. 

Member of the National Labor Relations 

Board for the term of five years expiring 

December 16, 1994. (Reappointment) 

DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

* 714 1074 Shirin Raziuddin Tahir-Kheli, of Apr 5, 90 Mr. Pell, 

Pennsylvania, to be the Alternate Committee on Foreign 

Representative of the United States of Relations, without printed 

America for Special Political Affairs in report. 

the United Nations, with the rank of 

Ambassador. 

*Signifies nominee's commitment to respond to requests to appear and testify before any duly 

constituted committee of the Senate.
§ 910.34 Accommodations for the physically handicapped. ( a ) Every *development* shall incorporate features which will make the *development* accessible by the physically handicapped. The standards in the “American Standard Specifications for Making Buildings and Facilities Accessible to, and Usable by the Physically Handicapped,” published by the American National Standards Institute, Inc. (ANSI A 117.1-1961 (1971)), are recommended.
( b ) Where a *development* includes a historic structure, the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's policy, “Supplementary Guidance—Handicapped Access to Historic Properties,” (45 FR 9757, Feb. 13, 1980), should be observed.
```

[109th Congress Public Law 242]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ242.109]

[[Page 120 STAT. 570]]

Public Law 109-242
109th Congress

                                 An Act

 
 To amend the Public Health Service Act to prohibit the solicitation or 
 acceptance of tissue from fetuses gestated for research purposes, and 
        for other purposes. <<NOTE: July 19, 2006 -  [S. 3504]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress <<NOTE: Fetus Farming Prohibition 
Act of 2006. 42 USC 201 note.>> assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Fetus Farming Prohibition Act of 
2006''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF THE SOLICITATION OR ACCEPTANCE OF TISSUE FROM 
            FETUSES GESTATED FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES.

    Section 498B of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 289g-2) is 
amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsections (c) and (d) as subsections 
        (d) and (e), respectively;
            (2) by inserting after subsection (b) the following:

    ``(c) Solicitation or Acceptance of Tissue From Fetuses Gestated for 
Research Purposes.--It shall be unlawful for any person or entity 
involved or engaged in interstate commerce to--
            ``(1) solicit or knowingly acquire, receive, or accept a 
        donation of human fetal tissue knowing that a human pregnancy 
        was deliberately initiated to provide such tissue; or
            ``(2) knowingly acquire, receive, or accept tissue or cells 
        obtained from a human embryo or fetus that was gestated in the 
        uterus of a nonhuman animal.'';
            (3) in paragraph (1) of subsection (d), as so redesignated, 
        by striking ``(a) or (b)'' and inserting ``(a), (b), or (c)''; 
        and

[[Page 120 STAT. 571]]

            (4) in paragraph (1) of subsection (e), as so redesignated, 
        by striking ``section 498A(f)'' and inserting ``section 
        498A(g)''.

    Approved July 19, 2006.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 3504:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 152 (2006):
            July 17, considered in Senate.
            July 18, considered and passed Senate and House.

                                  <all>
```
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Charles Zwebner, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Yak Communications Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure
controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the
Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
Registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrants internal control over financial
reporting.

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the Registrants auditors and the audit committee of the Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                     |  |     |  |                          
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------
|Date: April 21, 2006 |  | By: |  | /s/ Charles Zwebner      
|                     |  |     |  | Charles Zwebner          
|                     |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer &
|                     |  |     |  | President
SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

ONE HUNDRED THIRD CONGRESS 

Convened January 5, 1993 

FIRST SESSION { 

SECOND SESSION { 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Thursday, January 28, 1993 

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF WALTER J. STEWART, 

SECRETARY OF THE SENATE 

By Gerald A. Hackett, Executive Oerk 
Treaty I 

Doc. No. 

1 

TREATIES 

Subject Reported 

By 
2 

ROMIMATIONS PLACED ON THE SECRETARY'S DESK IN THE 

SERVICE 

PUBLIC HEALTR 

Public Health Service nominations beginning Lawrence Y Agodoa, and ending Janet M Ruck, which 

nominations were received by the Senate and appeared in the Congressional Record of January 5, 

1993. 

hblic Health Service nominations beginning Alfred L Brassel, Jr. and ending Maruta Zit.ans, 

which nominations were received by the Senate and appeared in the Congressional Record of Jamiary 

s. 1993. 

Public Health Service nominations beginning Thomas C. Bonin, and ending Brent B. Warren, which 

nomi.Dltions were received by the Senate and appeared in the Congressional Record of January 6 1993. •
Table of Contents

Exhibit32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Salomon Smith Barney Global Diversified FuturesFund L.P. (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Qfor the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), I, Daniel R. McAuliffe, Jr., ChiefFinancial Officer and Director of Citigroup Managed Futures LLC,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Partnership.

/s/ Daniel R.McAuliffe, Jr.

|  |
|--|
|  |  |
|  |

Daniel R.McAuliffe, Jr.Citigroup Managed Futures LLC Chief FinancialOfficer and Director

Date: May 12,2006

----
§ 1201.2 Scope. ( a ) This part states the procedures followed with respect to: ( 1 ) Service of summonses and complaints or other requests or demands directed to the Corporation or to any Corporation employee in connection with Federal or State litigation arising out of, or involving the performance of, official activities of the Corporation; and
( 2 ) Oral or written disclosure, in response to subpoenas, orders, or other requests or demands from Federal or by State judicial or quasi-judicial authority, whether civil or criminal, or in response to requests for depositions, affidavits, admissions, responses to interrogatories, document production, or other litigation-related matters of: ( i ) Any material contained in the files of the Corporation; or
( ii ) Any information acquired: ( A ) When the subject of the request is currently a Corporation employee or was a Corporation employee; or
( B ) As part of the performance of the person's duties or by virtue of the person's position.
( b ) Sections 1201.3 through 1201.10 do not apply to: ( 1 ) Testimony or records provided in accordance with the Office of Personnel Management regulations implementing 5 U.S.C. 6322.
( 2 ) Requests for, and release of, records under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552, and the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. 552a.
( 3 ) Disclosures to the Office of Inspector General or requests by the Office of Inspector General for official information or records.
( c ) The procedures in this part apply to Corporation employees and official information within the Corporation Office of Inspector General. However, any determinations or other actions to be made by the General Counsel under this part, relating to employees or official information within the Office of Inspector General, shall be made by the Inspector General.
[63 FR 4598, Jan. 30, 1998, as amended at 63 FR 64199, Nov. 19, 1998]
833 P.2d 911

#### Eleanor Faye HUERTA, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Robert HUERTA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 19088.

Supreme Court of Idaho, Boise,

May 1992 Term.

June 8, 1992.

Webb, Pedersen & Webb, Twin Falls, for defendant-appellant. Lloyd J. Webb argued.

Dial, Looze & May, Pocatello, for plaintiff-respondent. Brent E. Asay argued.

REINHARDT, Justice Pro Tern.

This appeal arises from a divorce action in which the parties disputed the proper characterization, valuation and division of property. In addition to asserting error with regard to the characterization and division of property, the appellant contends the trial court erred by failing to make sufficient findings relating to valuation of property.

In divorce actions, it is well established that a trial court is required to make findings of fact. *See*I.R.C.P. 52(a); *Clark v. Clark,*89 Idaho 91, 403 P.2d 570 (1965). As we have previously noted:

> an appellate court may only disregard a lack of findings where the record is clear and yields an obvious answer to the relevant factual question. Absent such circumstances, the failure of the trial court to make findings of fact ... will necessitate a reversal of the judgment and a remand for additional findings an conclusions unless such findings and conclusions would not affect the judgment entered ...

*Pope v. Intermountain Gas Co.,*103 Idaho 217, 225, 646 P.2d 988, 996 (1982). In the instant case, the magistrate court failed to make sufficient factual findings with regard to the valuation of the property at issue, and the record does not provide a clear and obvious explanation. Because the record does not provide a basis for review of the magistrate's decision, the judgment and decree are vacated and the cause remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.1

Costs to appellant.

BAKES, C.J., and BISTLINE, JOHNSON and McDEVITT, JJ., concur.

1

. At oral argument on appeal the parties requested that the record in this matter be augmerited. In light of our opinion, the motion to augment the record is denied.
Opinion issued January 30, 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01 - 12 - 00147 - CR NO. 01 - 12 - 00148 - CR

——————————— CODY JAMES ROSS , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee On Appeal from the 351st District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No s . 1280186 & 1323721

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Cody James Ross , has filed a “M otion to Dismiss Appeal.” We have not issued a decision in the appeal, and the motion complies with rule 42.2(a). See T EX . R. A PP . P. 42.2(a). Further, although the motion does not contain a certificate of conference, the motion contains a certificate of serv ice stating that it2

was served on the St ate and has been on file with the Court for more than 10 days, and the State has not responded or otherwise expressed opposition to the motion. See T EX . R. A PP . P . 10.1(a)(5), 10.3(a)(2). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 43.2(f). We dismiss any pending motions as moot PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Bland and Huddle

. Do not p ublish. T EX . R. A PP . P. 47.2(b).