Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 221 / Thursday, November 16, 2006 / Rules and Regulations 66645 

assessment revenue for the 2006–07 

production year as a percentage of total 

grower revenue could range between 

.040 and .042 percent. 

While assessments impose some 

additional costs on handlers, the costs 

are minimal and uniform on all 

handlers. Some of the additional costs 

may be passed on to producers. 

However, decreasing the assessment rate 

will reduce the burden on handlers, and 

may reduce the burden on producers. In 

addition, the committee’s meeting was 

widely publicized throughout the 

California pistachio industry and all 

interested persons were invited to 

attend the meeting and encouraged to 

participate in committee deliberations 

on all issues. Like all committee 

meetings, the May 23, 2006, meeting 

was a public meeting and all entities, 

both large and small, were able to 

express views on this issue. 

This rule imposes no additional 

reporting and recordkeeping on either 

small or large pistachio handlers. As 

with all Federal marketing order 

programs, reports and forms are 

periodically reviewed to reduce 

information requirements and 

duplication by industry and public 

sector agencies. In addition, USDA has 

not identified any relevant Federal rules 

that duplicate, overlap, or conflict with 

this rule. 

AMS is committed to complying with 

the E-Government Act, to promote the 

use of the Internet and other 

information technologies to provide 

increased opportunities for citizen 

access to Government information and 

services, and for other purposes. 

A proposed rule concerning this 

action was published in the Federal 

Register on August 25, 2006 (71 FR 

50374). Copies of the proposed rule 

were also mailed or sent via facsimile to 

all pistachio handlers. Finally, the 

proposal was made available through 

the Internet by USDA and the Office of 

the Federal Register. A 30-day comment 

period ending September 25, 2006, was 

provided for interested persons to 

respond to the proposal. No comments 

were received. 

A small business guide on complying 

with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop 

marketing agreements and orders may 

be viewed at: http://www.ams.usda.gov/ 

fv/moab.html. Any questions about the 

compliance guide should be sent to Jay 

Guerber at the previously mentioned 

address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

CONTACT section. 

After consideration of all relevant 

material presented, including the 

information and recommendation 

submitted by the committee and other 

available information, it is hereby found 

that this rule, as hereinafter set forth, 

will tend to effectuate the declared 

policy of the Act. 

Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, it is also 

found and determined that good cause 

exists for not postponing the effective 

date of this rule until 30 days after 

publication in the Federal Register 

because the 2006–07 production year 

began on September 1, 2006, and 

pistachio handlers are already receiving 

2006–07 crop pistachios from growers. 

The decreased assessment rate applies 

to all pistachios received during the 

2006–07 year and subsequent seasons. 

Further, handlers are aware of this rule 

which was unanimously recommended 

at a public meeting. Also, a 30-day 

comment period was provided for in the 

proposed rule, and no comments were 

received. 

List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 983 

Marketing agreements, Pistachios, 

Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements. 

■ For the reasons set forth in the 

preamble, 7 CFR part 983 is amended as 

follows: 

PART 983—PISTACHIOS GROWN IN 

CALIFORNIA 

■ 1. The authority citation for 7 CFR 

part 983 continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674. 

■ 2. Section 983.253 is amended by 

revising paragraph (a) to read as follows: 

§ 983.253 Assessment rate. 

(a) On and after September 1, 2006, a 

continuing assessment rate of $0.0007 

per pound of assessed-weight pistachios 

is established for California pistachios. 

The assessment obligation of each 

handler shall be computed by applying 

the assessment rate to the assessed 

weight computed pursuant to § 983.6. 

* * * * * 

Dated: November 14, 2006. 

Lloyd C. Day, 

Administrator, Agricultural Marketing 

Service. 

[FR Doc. 06–9252 Filed 11–14–06; 1:09 pm] 

BILLING CODE 3410–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Agricultural Marketing Service 

7 CFR Part 984 

[Docket No. FV06–984–2 IFR] 

Walnuts Grown in California; Increased 

Assessment Rate 

AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, 

USDA. 

ACTION: Interim final rule with request 

for comments. 

SUMMARY: This rule increases the 

assessment rate established for the 

Walnut Marketing Board (Board) for the 

2006–07 and subsequent marketing 

years from $0.0096 to $0.0101 per 

kernelweight pound of assessable 

walnuts. The Board locally administers 

the marketing order which regulates the 

handling of walnuts grown in 

California. Assessments upon walnut 

handlers are used by the Board to fund 

reasonable and necessary expenses of 

the program. The marketing year begins 

August 1 and ends July 31. The 

assessment rate will remain in effect 

indefinitely unless modified, 

suspended, or terminated. 

DATES: November 17, 2006. Comments 

received by January 16, 2007 will be 

considered prior to issuance of a final 

rule. 

ADDRESSES: Interested persons are 

invited to submit written comments 

concerning this rule. Comments must be 

sent to the Docket Clerk, Marketing 

Order Administration Branch, Fruit and 

Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400 

Independence Avenue, SW., STOP 

0237, Washington, DC 20250–0237; Fax: 

(202) 720–8938, E-mail: 

moab.docketclerk@usda.gov, or Internet: 

http://www.regulations.gov. Comments 

should reference the docket number and 

the date and page number of this issue 

of the Federal Register and will be 

made available for public inspection in 

the Office of the Docket Clerk during 

regular business hours, or can be viewed 

at: http://www.ams.usda.gov/fv/ 

moab.html. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Shereen Marino, Marketing Specialist, 

or Kurt Kimmel, Regional Manager, 

California Marketing Field Office, 

Marketing Order Administration 

Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, 

AMS, USDA; Telephone: (559) 487–

5901, Fax: (559) 487–5906, or E-mail: 

Shereen.Marino@usda.gov or 

Kurt.Kimmel@usda.gov. 

Small businesses may request 

information on complying with this 

regulation by contacting Jay Guerber, 


rmajette on PROD1PC67 with RULES1
66646 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 221 / Thursday, November 16, 2006 / Rules and Regulations 

Marketing Order Administration 

Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, 

AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence 

Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington, 

DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720–

2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or E-mail: 

Jay.Guerber@usda.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule 

is issued under Marketing Agreement 

and Order No. 984, both as amended (7 

CFR part 984), regulating the handling 

of walnuts grown in California, 

hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘order.’’

The order is effective under the 

Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act 

of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601–674), 

hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘Act.’’

The Department of Agriculture 

(USDA) is issuing this rule in 

conformance with Executive Order 

12866. 

This rule has been reviewed under 

Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice 

Reform. Under the marketing order now 

in effect, California walnut handlers are 

subject to assessments. Funds to 

administer the order are derived from 

such assessments. It is intended that the 

assessment rate as issued herein will be 

applicable to all assessable walnuts 

beginning on August 1, 2006, and 

continue until amended, suspended, or 

terminated. This rule will not preempt 

any State or local laws, regulations, or 

policies, unless they present an 

irreconcilable conflict with this rule. 

The Act provides that administrative 

proceedings must be exhausted before 

parties may file suit in court. Under 

section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any 

handler subject to an order may file 

with USDA a petition stating that the 

order, any provision of the order, or any 

obligation imposed in connection with 

the order is not in accordance with law 

and request a modification of the order 

or to be exempted therefrom. Such 

handler is afforded the opportunity for 

a hearing on the petition. After the 

hearing USDA would rule on the 

petition. The Act provides that the 

district court of the United States in any 

district in which the handler is an 

inhabitant, or has his or her principal 

place of business, has jurisdiction to 

review USDA’s ruling on the petition, 

provided an action is filed not later than 

20 days after the date of the entry of the 

ruling. 

This rule increases the assessment 

rate established for the Board for the 

2006–07 and subsequent marketing 

years from $0.0096 to $0.0101 per 

kernelweight pound of assessable 

walnuts. 

The California walnut marketing 

order provides authority for the Board, 

with the approval of USDA, to formulate 

an annual budget of expenses and 

collect assessments from handlers to 

administer the program. The members 

of the Board are producers and handlers 

of California walnuts. They are familiar 

with the Board’s needs and the costs for 

goods and services in their local area 

and are thus in a position to formulate 

an appropriate budget and assessment 

rate. The assessment rate is formulated 

and discussed at a public meeting. 

Thus, all directly affected persons have 

an opportunity to participate and 

provide input. 

For the 2005–06 and subsequent 

marketing years, the Board 

recommended, and USDA approved, an 

assessment rate of $0.0096 per 

kernelweight of assessable walnuts that 

would continue in effect from year to 

year unless modified, suspended, or 

terminated by USDA upon 

recommendation and information 

submitted by the Board or other 

information available to USDA. 

The Board met on September 8, 2006, 

and unanimously recommended 2006–

07 expenditures of $3,222,860 and an 

assessment rate of $0.0101 per 

kernelweight pound of assessable 

walnuts. In comparison, last year’s 

budgeted expenditures were $2,937,600. 

The assessment rate of $0.0101 per 

kernelweight pound of assessable 

walnuts is $0.0005 per pound higher 

than the rate currently in effect. The 

higher assessment rate is necessary to 

cover increased expenses including 

increased salaries, operating expenses 

and research for the 2006–07 marketing 

year. 

The following table compares major 

budget expenditures recommended by 

the Board for the 2005–06 and 2006–07 

marketing years: 

Budget expense categories 2005–06 2006–07 

Administrative Staff/Field Salaries & Benefits ......................................................................................................... $360,000 $415,000 

Travel/Board Expenses ........................................................................................................................................... 80,000 75,000 

Office Costs/Annual Audit ........................................................................................................................................ 132,500 142,500 

Program Expenses Including Research: 

Controlled Purchases ....................................................................................................................................... 5,000 5,000 

Crop Acreage Survey ....................................................................................................................................... 85,000 ........................

Crop Estimate ................................................................................................................................................... 95,000 100,000 

Production Research Director .......................................................................................................................... 75,000 75,000 

Production Research ........................................................................................................................................ 500,000 650,000 

Domestic Market Development ........................................................................................................................ 1,550,000 1,750,000 

Reserve for Contingency .................................................................................................................................. 55,100 10,360 

The assessment rate recommended by 

the Board was derived by dividing 

anticipated expenses by expected 

shipments of California walnuts 

certified as merchantable. Merchantable 

shipments for the year are estimated at 

318,600,000 kernelweight pounds 

which should provide $3,217,860 in 

assessment income. Assessment income 

combined with interest income should 

allow the Board to cover its expenses. 

Unexpended funds may be used 

temporarily to defray expenses of the 

subsequent marketing year, but must be 

made available to the handlers from 

whom collected within 5 months after 

the end of the year, according to 

§ 984.69. 

The estimate for merchantable 

shipments is based on the California 

Agricultural Statistics Service’s crop 

estimate for the crop year of 354,000 

tons (inshell). Pursuant to § 981.51(b) of 

the order, this figure was converted to 

a merchantable kernelweight basis using 

a factor of .45 (354,000 tons × 2,000 

pounds/ton × .45). 

The assessment rate established in 

this rule will continue in effect 

indefinitely unless modified, 

suspended, or terminated by USDA 

upon recommendation and information 

submitted by the Board or other 

available information. 

Although this assessment rate will be 

in effect for an indefinite period, the 

Board will continue to meet prior to or 

during each marketing year to 

recommend a budget of expenses and 

consider recommendations for 

modification of the assessment rate. The 

dates and times of Board meetings are 

available from the Board or USDA. 

Board meetings are open to the public 

and interested persons may express 


rmajette on PROD1PC67 with RULES1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 221 / Thursday, November 16, 2006 / Rules and Regulations 66647 

their views at these meetings. USDA 

will evaluate Board recommendations 

and other available information to 

determine whether modification of the 

assessment rate is needed. Further 

rulemaking will be undertaken as 

necessary. The Board’s 2006–07 budget 

and those for subsequent marketing 

years will be reviewed and, as 

appropriate, approved by USDA. 

Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis 

Pursuant to requirements set forth in 

the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), the 

Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) 

has considered the economic impact of 

this rule on small entities. Accordingly, 

AMS has prepared this initial regulatory 

flexibility analysis. 

The purpose of the RFA is to fit 

regulatory actions to the scale of 

business subject to such actions in order 

that small businesses will not be unduly 

or disproportionately burdened. 

Marketing orders issued pursuant to the 

Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are 

unique in that they are brought about 

through group action of essentially 

small entities acting on their own 

behalf. Thus, both statutes have small 

entity orientation and compatibility. 

There are currently 44 handlers of 

California walnuts subject to regulation 

under the marketing order and 

approximately 5,150 growers in the 

production area. Small agricultural 

service firms are defined by the Small 

Business Administration (SBA) (13 CFR 

121.201) as those whose annual receipts 

are less than $6,500,000, and small 

agricultural producers are defined as 

those whose annual receipts are less 

than $750,000. 

Current industry information suggests 

that 16 of the 44 handlers (36 percent) 

shipped over $6,500,000 of 

merchantable walnuts and could be 

considered large handlers by the SBA. 

Twenty-eight of the 44 walnut handlers 

(64 percent) shipped under $6,500,000 

of merchantable walnuts and could be 

considered small handlers. 

The number of large walnut growers 

(annual walnut revenue greater than 

$750,000) can be estimated as follows. 

According to the National Agricultural 

Statistics Service (NASS), the average 

yield per acre for 2003–05 is 1.567 tons. 

A grower with 353 acres with average 

yields would produce approximately 

553 tons. The average of grower prices 

for 2003–05 (published by NASS) is 

$1,357 per ton. At that average price, the 

553 tons produced on 353 acres would 

yield approximately $750,000 in annual 

revenue. The 2002 Agricultural Census 

indicated 56 walnut farms (just under 

one percent of the 7,025 walnut farmers 

in 2002) were 500 acres or larger. The 

500 acre threshold in the census data is 

somewhat larger than the 353 acres that 

would produce $750,000 in revenue 

with average yields and average prices. 

Thus, it can be concluded that the 

number of large walnut farms in 2006 is 

still likely to be not much above one 

percent. Based on the foregoing, it can 

be concluded that the majority of 

California walnut handlers and 

producers may be classified as small 

entities. 

This rule increases the assessment 

rate established for the Board and 

collected from handlers for the 2006–07 

and subsequent marketing years from 

$0.0096 to $0.0101 per kernelweight 

pound of assessable walnuts. The Board 

unanimously recommended 2006–07 

expenditures of $3,222,860 and an 

assessment rate of $0.0101 per 

kernelweight pound of assessable 

walnuts. The assessment rate of $0.0101 

is $0.0005 higher than the 2005–06 rate. 

The quantity of assessable walnuts for 

the 2006–07 marketing year is estimated 

at 318,600,000 merchantable 

kernelweight pounds. Thus, the $0.0101 

rate should provide $3,217,860 in 

assessment income. Assessment income 

combined with interest income should 

be adequate to meet this year’s 

expenses. The increased assessment rate 

is primarily due to increased budget 

expenditures. 

The following table compares major 

budget expenditures recommended by 

the Board for the 2005–06 and 2006–07 

marketing years: 

Budget expense categories 2005–06 2006–07 

Administrative Staff/Field Salaries & Benefits ......................................................................................................... $360,000 $415,000 

Travel/Board Expenses ........................................................................................................................................... 80,000 75,000 

Office Costs/Annual Audit ........................................................................................................................................ 132,500 142,500 

Program Expenses Including Research: 

Controlled Purchases ....................................................................................................................................... 5,000 5,000 

Crop Acreage Survey ....................................................................................................................................... 85,000 

Crop Estimate ................................................................................................................................................... 95,000 100,000 

Production Research Director .......................................................................................................................... 75,000 75,000 

Production Research ........................................................................................................................................ 500,000 650,000 

Domestic Market Development ........................................................................................................................ 1,550,000 1,750,000 

Reserve for Contingency .................................................................................................................................. 55,100 10,360 

Prior to arriving at this budget, the 

Board considered alternative 

expenditure levels, but ultimately 

decided that the recommended levels 

were reasonable to properly administer 

the order. Unexpended funds may be 

used temporarily to defray expenses of 

the subsequent marketing year, but must 

be made available to the handlers from 

whom collected within 5 months after 

the end of the year, according to 

§ 984.69. 

According to NASS, the season 

average grower prices for years 2004 and 

2005 were $1,390 and $1,520 per ton, 

respectively. Dividing these average 

grower prices by 2,000 pounds per ton 

provides an inshell price per pound 

range of between $.70 and $.76. 

Adjusting by a few cents above and 

below those prices ($0.67 to $0.79 per 

inshell pound) provides a reasonable 

price range within which the 2006–07 

season average price is likely to fall. 

Dividing these inshell prices per pound 

by the 0.45 conversion factor designated 

in the order yields a 2006–07 price 

range estimate of $1.49 and $1.76 per 

kernelweight pound of assessable 

walnuts. 

To calculate the percentage of grower 

revenue represented by the assessment 

rate, the assessment rate of $0.0101 (per 

kernelweight pound) is divided by the 

low and high estimates of the price 

range and then multiplied by 100. The 

estimated assessment revenue for the 

2006–07 marketing year as a percentage 

of total grower revenue would likely 

range between .7 and .6 percent. 

This action increases the assessment 

obligation imposed on handlers. While 

assessments impose some additional 

costs on handlers, the costs are minimal 

and uniform on all handlers. Some of 

the additional costs may be passed on 

to producers. However, these costs 

would be offset by the benefits derived 

by the operation of the marketing order. 

In addition, the Board’s meeting was 

widely publicized throughout the 


rmajette on PROD1PC67 with RULES1
66648 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 221 / Thursday, November 16, 2006 / Rules and Regulations 

California walnut industry and all 

interested persons were invited to 

attend the meeting and participate in 

Board deliberations on all issues. Like 

all Board meetings, the September 8, 

2006, meeting was a public meeting and 

all entities, both large and small, were 

able to express views on this issue. 

Finally, interested persons are invited to 

submit information on the regulatory 

and informational impacts of this action 

on small businesses. 

This action imposes no additional 

reporting or recordkeeping requirements 

on either small or large California 

walnut handlers. As with all Federal 

marketing order programs, reports and 

forms are periodically reviewed to 

reduce information requirements and 

duplication by industry and public 

sector agencies. 

The AMS is committed to complying 

with the E-Government Act, to promote 

the use of the Internet and other 

information technologies to provide 

increased opportunities for citizen 

access to Government information and 

services, and for other purposes. 

USDA has not identified any relevant 

Federal rules that duplicate, overlap, or 

conflict with this rule. 

A small business guide on complying 

with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop 

marketing agreements and orders may 

be viewed at: http://www.ams.usda.gov/ 

fv/moab.html. Any questions about the 

compliance guide should be sent to Jay 

Guerber at the previously mentioned 

address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

CONTACT section. 

After consideration of all relevant 

material presented, including the 

information and recommendation 

submitted by the Board and other 

available information, it is hereby found 

that this rule, as hereinafter set forth, 

will tend to effectuate the declared 

policy of the Act. 

Pursuant to 5 U.S.C 553, it also found 

and determined upon good cause that it 

is impracticable, unnecessary, and 

contrary to the public interest to give 

preliminary notice prior to putting this 

rule into effect, and that good cause 

exists for not postponing the effective 

date of this rule until 30 days after 

publication in the Federal Register 

because handlers have begun shipping 

walnuts for the 2006–07 marketing year. 

The marketing year began on August 1, 

2006, and the assessment rate applies to 

all walnuts shipped during the 2006–07 

and subsequent seasons. With the 

assessment rate in effect prior to 

publication of this rule, the Board 

would not generate sufficient revenue to 

meet its budgeted expenses for the 

2006–07 marketing year. The Board 

needs to have sufficient funds to pay its 

expenses which are incurred on a 

continuous basis. Further, handlers are 

aware of this rule which was 

unanimously recommended at a public 

meeting and is similar to other 

assessment rate actions issued in prior 

years. This interim final rule provides a 

60-day comment period, and any 

comments received will be considered 

prior to finalization of this rule. 

List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 984 

Marketing agreements, Walnuts, Nuts, 

Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements. 

■ For the reasons set forth in the 

preamble, 7 CFR part 984 is amended as 

follows: 

PART 984—WALNUTS GROWN IN 

CALIFORNIA 

■ 1. The authority citation for 7 CFR 

part 984 continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674. 

■ 2. Section 984.347 is revised to read 

as follows: 

§ 984.347 Assessment rate. 

On and after August 1, 2006, an 

assessment rate of $0.0101 per 

kernelweight pound is established for 

California merchantable walnuts. 

Dated: November 14, 2006. 

Lloyd C. Day, 

Administrator, Agricultural Marketing 

Service. 

[FR Doc. 06–9251 Filed 11–14–06; 1:09 pm] 

BILLING CODE 3410–02–P 

NUCLEAR REGULATORY 

COMMISSION 

10 CFR Part 50 

RIN 3150–AH95 

Criticality Control of Fuel Within Dry 

Storage Casks or Transportation 

Packages in a Spent Fuel Pool 

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission. 

ACTION: Direct final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission (NRC) is amending its 

regulations that govern domestic 

licensing of production and utilization 

facilities so that the requirements 

governing criticality control for spent 

fuel pool storage racks do not apply to 

the fuel within a spent fuel 

transportation package or storage cask 

when a package or cask is in a spent fuel 

pool. These packages and casks are 

subject to separate criticality control 

requirements. This action is necessary 

to avoid applying two different sets of 

criticality control requirements to fuel 

within a package or cask in a spent fuel 

pool. 

DATES: Effective Date: The final rule will 

become effective January 30, 2007, 

unless significant adverse comments are 

received by December 18, 2006. A 

significant adverse comment is a 

comment where the commenter 

explains why the rule would be 

inappropriate, including challenges to 

the rule’s underlying premise or 

approach, or would be ineffective or 

unacceptable without a change (refer to 

‘‘Procedural Background’’ in the 

Supplementary Information section of 

this document for further details). If the 

rule is withdrawn, timely notice will be 

published in the Federal Register. 

Comments received after December 18, 

2006 will be considered if it is practical 

to do so, but the NRC is able to ensure 

only that comments received on or 

before this date will be considered. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments 

by any one of the following methods. 

Please include the following number 

RIN 3150–AH95 in the subject line of 

your comments. Comments on 

rulemakings submitted in writing or in 

electronic form will be made available 

for public inspection. Because your 

comments will not be edited to remove 

any identifying or contact information, 

the NRC cautions you against including 

personal information such as social 

security numbers and birth dates in 

your submission. 

Mail comments to: Secretary, U.S. 

Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 

Washington, DC 20555–0001, ATTN: 

Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff. 

E-mail comments to: SECY@nrc.gov. If 

you do not receive a reply e-mail 

confirming that we have received your 

comments, contact us directly at (301) 

415–1966. You may also submit 

comments via the NRC’s rulemaking 

Web site at http://ruleforum.llnl.gov. 

Address questions about our rulemaking 

website to Carol Gallagher at (301) 415–

5905; e-mail cag@nrc.gov. Comments 

can also be submitted via the Federal 

eRulemaking Portal http:// 

www.regulations.gov. 

Hand deliver comments to: 11555 

Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 

20852, between 7:30 a.m. and 4:15 p.m. 

Federal workdays [telephone (301) 415–

1966]. 

Fax comments to: Secretary, U.S. 

Nuclear Regulatory Commission at (301) 

415–1101. 

Publicly available documents related 

to this rulemaking may be viewed 

electronically on the public computers 

located at the NRC’s Public Document 


rmajette on PROD1PC67 with RULES1