Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 185 / Monday, September 25, 2006 / Notices 55809 

2.0 Proposed Change 

3.0 Background 

4.0 Technical Analysis 

5.0 Regulatory Safety Analysis 

5.1 No Significant Hazards Determination 

5.2 Applicable Regulatory Requirements/ 

Criteria 

6.0 Environmental Consideration 

7.0 References 

1.0 Description 

The proposed amendment would 

revise LCO 3.10.1, and the associated 

Bases, to expand its scope to include 

provisions for temperature excursions 

greater than [200]°F as a consequence of 

inservice leak and hydrostatic testing, 

and as a consequence of scram time 

testing initiated in conjunction with an 

inservice leak or hydrostatic test, while 

considering operational conditions to be 

in Mode 4. This change is consistent 

with NRC approved Revision 0 to 

Technical Specification Task Force 

(TSTF) Improved Standard Technical 

Specification Change Traveler, TSTF–

484, ‘‘Use of TS 3.10.1 for Scram Time 

Testing Activities.’’ The availability of 

this TS improvement was announced in 

the Federal Register on [Date] ([ ] FR [ 

]) as part of the consolidated line item 

improvement process (CLIIP). 

2.0 Proposed Change 

Consistent with the NRC approved 

Revision 0 of TSTF–484, the proposed 

TS changes include a revised TS 3.10.1, 

‘‘Inservice Leak and Hydrostatic Testing 

Operation.’’ Proposed revisions to the 

TS Bases are also included in this 

application. Adoption of the TS Bases 

associated with TSTF–484, Revision 0 is 

an integral part of implementing this TS 

amendment. The changes to the affected 

TS Bases pages will be incorporated in 

accordance with the TS Bases Control 

Program. 

This application is being made in 

accordance with the CLIIP. [Licensee] is 

not proposing variations or deviations 

from the TS changes described in 

TSTF–484, Revision 0, or the NRC 

staff’s model safety evaluation (SE) 

published on [Date] ([ ] FR [ ]) as part 

of the CLIIP Notice of Availability. 

3.0 Background 

The background for this application is 

adequately addressed by the NRC Notice 

of Availability published on [Date] ([ ] 

FR [ ]). 

4.0 Technical Analysis 

[Licensee] has reviewed the safety 

evaluation (SE) published on [Date] ([ ] 

FR [ ]) as part of the CLIIP Notice of 

Availability. [Licensee] has concluded 

that the technical justifications 

presented in the SE prepared by the 

NRC staff are applicable to [Plant, UNIT 

No.] and therefore justify this 

amendment for the incorporation of the 

proposed changes to the [Plant] TS. 

5.0 Regulatory Safety Analysis 

5.1 No Significant Hazards 

Determination 

[Licensee] has reviewed the no 

significant hazards determination 

published on [Date] ([ ] FR [ ]) as part 

of the CLIIP Notice of Availability. 

[Licensee] has concluded that the 

determination presented in the notice is 

applicable to [Plant, Unit No.] and the 

determination is hereby incorporated by 

reference to satisfy the requirements of 

10 CFR 50.91(a). 

5.2 Applicable Regulatory 

Requirements/Criteria 

A description of the proposed TS 

change and its relationship to applicable 

regulatory requirements was provided 

in the NRC Notice of Availability 

published on [Date] ([ [ FR [ ]). 

6.0 Environmental Consideration 

[Licensee] has reviewed the 

environmental evaluation included in 

the safety evaluation (SE) published on 

[Date] ([ ] FR [ ]) as part of the CLIIP 

Notice of Availability. [Licensee] has 

concluded that the staff’s findings 

presented in that evaluation are 

applicable to [Plant, No.] and the 

evaluation is hereby incorporated by 

reference for this application. 

7.0 References 

1. Federal Register Notice, Notice of 

Availability published on [Date] ([ ] FR 

[ ]). 

2. Federal Register Notice, Notice for 

Comment published on August 21, 2006 

(71 FR 48561) 

3. TSTF–484 Revision 0, ‘‘Use of TS 

3.10.1 for Scram Times Testing 

Activities’’

Attachment 2—Proposed Technical 

Specification Change (Mark-Up) 

Attachment 3—Proposed Technical 

Specification Change (Re-Typed) 

Attachment 4—Proposed Technical 

Specification Bases Change (Mark-Up) 

Principal Contributor: Aron Lewin. 

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 30th of 

August 2006. 

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

Timothy Kobetz, 

Chief, Technical Specifications Branch, 

Division of Inspections and Regional Support, 

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. 

[FR Doc. 06–8152 Filed 9–22–06; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P 

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL 

MANAGEMENT 

Submission for Omb Review; 

Comment Request for Reclearance of 

a Revised Information Collection: RI 

30–9 

AGENCY: Office of Personnel 

Management. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: In accordance with the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. 

L. 104–13, May 22, 1995), this notice 

announces that the Office of Personnel 

Management (OPM) has submitted to 

the Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB) a request for reclearance of a 

revised information collection. RI 30–9, 

Reinstatement of Disability Annuity 

Previously Terminated Because of 

Restoration to Earning Capacity, informs 

former disability annuitants of their 

right to request restoration under title 5, 

U.S.C. Section 8337. It also specifies the 

conditions to be met and the 

documentation required for a person to 

request reinstatement. 

Approximately 200 forms are 

completed annually. The form takes 

approximately 60 minutes to respond, 

including a medical examination. The 

annual estimated burden is 200 hours. 

Burden may vary depending on the time 

required for a medical examination. 

For copies of this proposal, contact 

Mary Beth Smith-Toomey on (202) 606–

8358, FAX (202) 418–3251 or via E-mail 

to MaryBeth.Smith-Toomey@opm.gov. 

Please include a mailing address with 

your request. 

DATES: Comments on this proposal 

should be received within 30 calendar 

days from the date of this publication. 

ADDRESSES: Send or deliver comments 

to—

Pamela S. Israel, Chief, Operations 

Support Group, Center for Retirement 

and Insurance Services, U.S. Office of 

Personnel Management, 1900 E Street, 

NW., Room 3349, Washington, DC 

20415–3540. and 

Brenda Aguilar, OPM Desk Officer, 

Office of Information & Regulatory 

Affair, Office of Management and 

Budget, New Executive Office 

Building, NW., Room 10235, 

Washington, DC 20503. 

For Information Regarding 

Administrative Coordination—Contact: 

Cyrus S. Benson, Team Leader, 

Publications Team, RIS Support 

Services/Support Group, (202) 606–

0623. 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
55810 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 185 / Monday, September 25, 2006 / Notices 

U.S. Office of Personnel Management. 

Dan G. Blair, 

Deputy Director. 

[FR Doc. 06–8139 Filed 9–22–06; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6325–38–P 

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL 

MANAGEMENT 

Submission for OMB Review; 

Comment Request for Review of a 

Revised Information Collection: 

RI 25–15 

AGENCY: Office of Personnel 

Management. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: In accordance with the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. 

L. 104–13, May 22, 1995 and 5 CFR 

1320), this notice announces that the 

Office of Personnel Management (OPM) 

has submitted to the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) a 

request for review of a revised 

information collection. RI 25–15, Notice 

of Change in Student’s Status, is used to 

collect sufficient information from adult 

children of deceased Federal employees 

or annuitants to assure that the child 

continues to be eligible for payments 

from OPM. 

Approximately 2,500 certifications are 

processed annually. Each form takes 

approximately 20 minutes to complete. 

The annual estimated burden is 835 

hours. 

For copies of this proposal, contact 

Mary Beth Smith-Toomey on (202) 606–

8358, FAX (202) 418–3251 or E-mail to 

MaryBeth Smith-Toomey@opm.gov. 

Please include your mailing address 

with your request. 

DATES: Comments on this proposal 

should be received within 30 calendar 

days from the date of this publication. 

ADDRESSES: Send or deliver comments 

to—

Pamela S. Israel, Chief, Operations 

Support Group, Center for Retirement 

and Insurance Services, U.S. Office of 

Personnel Management, 1900 E Street, 

NW., Room 3349, Washington, DC 

20415–3540, and 

Brenda Aguilar, OPM Desk Officer, 

Office of Information & Regulatory 

Affairs, Office of Management and 

Budget, New Executive Office 

Building, NW., Room 10235, 

Washington, DC 20503. 

For Information Regarding 

Administrative Coordination Contact: 

Cyrus S. Benson, Team Leader, 

Publications Team, RIS Support 

Services/Support Group, (202) 606–

0623. 

U.S. Office of Personnel Management. 

Dan G. Blair, 

Deputy Director. 

[FR Doc. 06–8144 Filed 9–22–06; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6325–38–P 

POSTAL SERVICE 

Changes in Domestic Mail 

Classifications 

AGENCY: Postal Service. 

ACTION: Notice of implementation of 

changes to the Domestic Mail 

Classification Schedule. 

SUMMARY: This notice sets forth the 

changes to the Domestic Mail 

Classification Schedule to be 

implemented as a result of the Decision 

of the Governors of the United States 

Postal Service on the Opinion and 

Recommended Decision of the Postal 

Rate Commission on Extension of 

Capital One NSA, Docket No. MC2006–

6. 

DATES: Effective Date: September 13, 

2006. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Matthew J. Connolly, (202) 268–8582. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On July 

26, 2006 the United States Postal 

Service, in conformance with chapter 36 

of the Postal Reorganization Act (39 

U.S.C. 101 et seq.), filed a request for a 

recommended decision by the Postal 

Rate Commission (PRC) asking that it 

recommend a one-year extension of an 

existing negotiated service agreement 

(NSA) with Capital One Services, Inc. 

The PRC designated this filing as Docket 

No. MC2006–6. On August 25, 2006, 

pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3624, the PRC 

issued to the Governors of the Postal 

Service its Opinion and Recommended 

Decision Approving the Extension of the 

Duration of a Negotiated Service 

Agreement, Docket No. MC2006–6. The 

PRC recommended that the NSA with 

Capital One Services, Inc. be extended 

for one year, through September 1, 2007. 

Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3625, the 

Governors of the United States Postal 

Service acted on the PRC’s 

recommendation on September 11, 

2006. In the Decision of the Governors 

of the United States Postal Service on 

the Opinion and Recommended 

Decision of the Postal Rate Commission 

on Extension of Capital One NSA, 

Docket No. MC2006–6, the Governors of 

the Postal Service approved the 

recommended decision. In accordance 

with Resolution 06–8, the Board of 

Governors established an 

implementation date of September 13, 

2006 on which the approved changes to 

the classification schedule for 

Negotiated Service Agreements take 

effect. The attachment to the Governors’

Decision, setting forth the classification 

changes ordered into effect by the 

Governors, is set forth below. 

In accordance with the Decision of the 

Governors and Resolution No. 06–8 of 

the Board of Governors, the Postal 

Service hereby gives notice that the 

classification changes set forth below 

became effective at 12:01 a.m. on 

September 13, 2006. 

Attachment to the Decision of the Governors 

of the United States Postal Service on the 

Opinion and Recommended Decision of the 

Postal Rate Commission on Extension of 

Capital One NSA, Docket No. MC2006–6 

(Additions Underlined; Deletions in 

Brackets) 

Domestic Mail Classification Schedule 

Negotiated Service Agreements, 

Classification Schedule 

610 Capital One Negotiated Service 

Agreement 

* * * * * 

610.33 Additional Discounts (Year 2 [and 

Year 3], Year 3, and Year 4). If eligible FirstClass Mail volume for the first year is less 

than 1.025 billion pieces, the additional 

discount tiers shown in Rate Schedule 610B 

shall apply to the incremental volumes in the 

second [and third], third, and fourth years in 

addition to the incremental discounts in Rate 

Schedule 610A. 

* * * * * 

610.5 Expiration 

The provisions of section 610 expire 

on September 1, [2006]2007 at 12:01 

a.m. 

* * * * * 

Stanley F. Mires, 

Chief Counsel, Legislative. 

[FR Doc. 06–8195 Filed 9–22–06; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7710–12–P 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 

COMMISSION 

Submissions for OMB Review; 

Comment Request 

Upon Written Request, Copies Available 

From: Securities and Exchange 

Commission, Office of Filings and 

Information Services, Washington, DC 

20549. 

Extensions: 

Form T–6; OMB Control No. 3235–0391; 

SEC File No. 270–344. 

Form 11–K; OMB Control No. 3235–0082; 

SEC File No. 270–101. 

Form 144; OMB Control No. 3235–0101; 

SEC File No. 270–112. 

Notice is hereby given that pursuant 

to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES