alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Maritime Commission

*Time and Date:*                     10 a.m.—November 8, 2006.                

*Place:*                     800 North Capitol Street, NW., First Floor Hearing Room, Washington, DC.                

*Status:*                     Closed.                

*Matters To Be Considered:*

                    1. Docket No. 02-08—                    *Odyssea Stevedoring of Puerto Rico, Inc.*                     v.                     *Puerto Rico Ports Authority;*

                    2. Docket No. 04-01—                    *International Shipping Agency, Inc.*                     v.                     *the Puerto Rico Ports Authority;*

                    3. Docket No. 04-06—                    *San Antonio Maritime Corp. and Antilles Cement Corp.*                     v.                     *Puerto Rico Ports Authority;*

                    4. Docket No. 99-16—                    *Carolina Marine Handling, Inc.*                     v.                     *South Carolina State Ports Authority, Charleston Naval Complex Redevelopment Authority, Charleston International Projects, Inc. and Charleston International Ports, LLC;*

5. Docket No. 06-01—Worldwide Relocations, Inc., All-in-One Shipping, Inc., Boston Logistics Corp., Around the World Shipping, Inc., Tradewind Consulting, Inc., Global Direct Shipping, Megan K. Karpick (a.k.a. Catherine Kaiser, Kathryn Kaiser, Catherine Kerpick, Megan Kaiser and Alexandria Hudson), Martin J. McKenzie, Patrick John Costadoni, Elizabeth F. Hudson, Sharon Fachler, and Oren Fachler, et al.—Possible Violations of Sections 8, 10 and 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 and the Commission's Regulations at 46 CFR 515.3, 515.21 and 520.3.

*Contact Person for More Information:*                     Bryant L. VanBrakle, Secretary, (202) 523-5725.                

Karen V. Gregory,

Assistant Secretary.

[FR Doc. 06-9083  Filed 11-1-06; 2:05 pm]

BILLING CODE 6730-01-M
SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

ONE HUNDRED THIRD CONGRESS 

Convened January 5, 1993 

FIRST SESSION { 

SECOND SESSION { 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Thursday, July 22, 1993 

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF WALTER J. STEWART, 

SECRETARY OF THE SENATE 

B) Gerald A. Hackett, Executive Clerk 
Calendar I Treaty 

No. . Doc No. 

1 

TREATIES 

Subject Reported 

By 
Calendar Message 

No No 

• 273 291 

• 274 410 

275 305 

• 287 409 

2 

NOMINATIONS 

Nominee, Office, And Predecessor 

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 

Thomas W. Payzant of Cahfomia, to be 

Assistant Secretary for Elementar} and 

Secondar; Education, Department of 

Education. vice John T MacDonald, 

resigned 

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE 

ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES 

Sheldon Hackne) of Pennsylvania. to be 

Chairperson of the National Endowment for 

the Humanities for a term of four years 

vice Lynne Vmcent Chenej resigned 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Eleanor Acheson of Massachusetts to be an 

Assistant Attorne) General vice Stephen 

J Markman, resigned 

[NEW REPORTS] 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

Robert Riggs Nordhaus, of the District of 

Columbia, to be General Counsel of the 

Department of Energy, vice John J Easton, 

Jr 

Reported 

Bv 

Jul 14, 93 Mr. Kennedy, 

Committee on Labor and 

Human Resources, without 

printed report. 

Do 

Jul 15. 93 Mr Biden, 

Commmee on the Judiciary 

without pnnted report 

Jul 21. 93 Mr. Johnston, 

Commtttee on Energy and 

Natural Resources, without 

nrm ted rennrt 

•S1gmf1es nominees ' commitment to respond to requests to appear and testify before any duly 

constituted committee of the Senate
#### § 1149.8 What kind of conduct results in program fraud enforcement?

If you make false claims or false statements, you may be subject to civil penalties and assessments under the PFCRA.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 2202** 

JOHN CUTONILLI , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,
v. STATE OF MARYLAND , Defendant

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore
. James K. Bredar , District Judge. ( 1:15

- cv - 00629

- JKB )

Submitted : February 25, 2016 Decided: February 29, 2016

Before SHEDD and HARRIS , Circuit Judges , and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge
.
Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. John Cutonilli, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Holdsworth Bowen, Assistant Attorney General, Pikesville, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: John Cutonilli seeks to appeal the district court’s order granting, in part, and denying without prejudice, in part, the State of Maryland’s motion to dismiss Cutonilli’s claims challenging Maryland’s Firearm Safety Act of 2013, Md. Code Ann., Crim. L. §§ 4

- 301 to 4

- 306 (LexisNexis 2015) , as violat ive of Maryland’s Constitution and the Second and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (20 12 ), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1 292 (20 12 ); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 , 545

- 46 (1949). The order Cutonilli seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal fo r lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately prese nted in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.2



January 11, 2001


The Board of Directors
Digital Star, Inc.
Unit 1806, Hutchison House
10 Harcourt Road
Central
Hong Kong


Dear Sirs,

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference in this Form 20-F of our report dated January 2, 2001 included in this
Registration Statement. It should be noted that we have not audited any
financial statements of the Company subsequent to September 30, 2000 or
performed any audit procedures subsequent to the date of our report.


Very truly yours,


/s/ Arthur Andersen & Co.
-------------------------
§ 1159.17 Which of the Endowment's systems of records are covered by exemptions in the Privacy Act? ( a ) Pursuant to and limited by 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2), the Endowment system entitled “Office of the Inspector General Investigative Files” shall be exempted from the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a, except for subsections (b); (c)(1) and (2); (e)(4)(A) through (F); (e)(6), (7), (9), (10), and (11); and (i), insofar as that Endowment system contains information pertaining to criminal law enforcement investigations.
( b ) Pursuant to and limited by 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2), the Endowment system entitled “Office of the Inspector General Investigative Files” shall be exempted from 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3); (d); (e)(1); (e)(4)(G), (H), and (I); and (f), insofar as that Endowment system consists of investigatory material compiled for law enforcement purposes, other than material within the scope of the exemption at 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2).
( c ) The Endowment system entitled “Office of the Inspector General Investigative Files” is exempt from the above-noted provisions of the Privacy Act because their application might alert investigation subjects to the existence or scope of investigations; lead to suppression, alteration, fabrication, or destruction of evidence; disclose investigative techniques or procedures; reduce the cooperativeness or safety of witnesses; or otherwise impair investigations.
**EXHIBIT32.1**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

    Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Tasker Capital Corp. (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q/A for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Richard D. Falcone, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company as of and for theperiods presented in the Report.

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company andwill be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.
| October 26, 2006                       |
|----------------------------------------|
|                                   |
|                                   |
| /s/ Richard D. Falcone                 |   |   |
| Richard D. Falcone                     |
| President and Chief  Executive Officer |
| (Principal Executive Officer)          |

 

----
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

1150 FIRST STREET, N.E. 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20463 

BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

In the Matter of ) 

) MURs 7443, 7447 & 7550 

Twitter, Inc., et al. ) 

)

SUPPLEMENTAL STATEMENT OF REASONS OF 

VICE CHAIR ALLEN DICKERSON 

AND COMMISSIONER JAMES E. “TREY” TRAINOR, III 

These Matters presented similar questions to those in Matters Under Review 

(“MUR”) 7821, 7827, and 7868 (Twitter, Inc., et al.). We joined in full our Office of 

General Counsel’s legal conclusions to recommend against enforcement. However, for 

substantially similar reasons to those we articulated in regard to MURs 7821, 7827, 

and 7868, we believe that Respondents’ alleged conduct is also shielded by both the 

Federal Election Campaign Act’s media exemption and the Press Clause of the First 

Amendment to the federal Constitution.1

______________________________

Allen Dickerson Date 

Vice Chair 

______________________________

James E. “Trey” Trainor, III Date 

Commissioner 

1 See Supp. Statement of Reasons of Vice Chair Dickerson and Comm’r Trainor, MURs 7821/7827/7868, 

Sept. 13, 2021. 

October 13, 2021

October 13, 2021

MUR744300066
§ 292.46 Timber harvesting activities. ( a ) *Other Lands.* The standards and guidelines of this section apply to timber harvesting activities in the Other Lands category of the HCNRA. ( 1 ) Timber may be harvested only to protect and enhance ecosystem health, wildlife habitat, or recreational and scenic uses; to reduce the risk of harm posed by hazard trees; or to respond to natural events such as wildfire, flood, earthquake, volcanic eruption, high winds, and disease or insect infestation.
( 2 ) Where authorized, trees may be harvested by selective cuttings. Openings created by the timber harvesting activity must be limited in size and number to the minimum necessary to accomplish the purpose of the harvest, and must blend with the natural landscape to the extent practicable.
( b ) *Wild and Scenic Rivers.* The following standards and guidelines apply to timber harvesting activities in the Wild and Scenic Rivers category of the HNCRA. ( 1 ) Timber may be harvested on river segments classified “scenic” or “recreational” to protect and enhance the values for which the river was designated.
( 2 ) Timber may be harvested on river segments classified “wild” only when necessary to provide for recreational facilities such as trails, to reduce the risk of hazard trees, or to respond to natural events provided that the activity is consistent with the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act.
( 3 ) Where authorized, timber harvesting activities on wild and scenic rivers may be conducted in accordance with and using the same methods as prescribed in section (a)(2) above.
( c ) *Wilderness Lands.* Except as provided for in Sections 4 (c) and
( d ) of the Wilderness Act and regulations at 36 CFR part 293, timber harvesting is prohibited on Wilderness Lands.
§ 800.12 Emergency situations. ( a ) *Agency procedures.* The agency official, in consultation with the appropriate SHPOs/THPOs, affected Indian tribes and Native Hawaiian organizations, and the Council, is encouraged to develop procedures for taking historic properties into account during operations which respond to a disaster or emergency declared by the President, a tribal government, or the Governor of a State or which respond to other immediate threats to life or property. If approved by the Council, the procedures shall govern the agency's historic preservation responsibilities during any disaster or emergency in lieu of §§ 800.3 through 800.6.
( b ) *Alternatives to agency procedures.* In the event an agency official proposes an emergency undertaking as an essential and immediate response to a disaster or emergency declared by the President, a tribal government, or the Governor of a State or another immediate threat to life or property, and the agency has not developed procedures pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section, the agency official may comply with section 106 by: ( 1 ) Following a programmatic agreement developed pursuant to § 800.14(b) that contains specific provisions for dealing with historic properties in emergency situations; or
( 2 ) Notifying the Council, the appropriate SHPO/THPO and any Indian tribe or Native Hawaiian organization that may attach religious and cultural significance to historic properties likely to be affected prior to the undertaking and affording them an opportunity to comment within seven days of notification. If the agency official determines that circumstances do not permit seven days for comment, the agency official shall notify the Council, the SHPO/THPO and the Indian tribe or Native Hawaiian organization and invite any comments within the time available.
( c ) *Local governments responsible for section 106 compliance.* When a local government official serves as the agency official for section 106 compliance, paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section also apply to an imminent threat to public health or safety as a result of a natural disaster or emergency declared by a local government's chief executive officer or legislative body, provided that if the Council or SHPO/THPO objects to the proposed action within seven days, the agency official shall comply with §§ 800.3 through 800.6.
( d ) *Applicability.* This section applies only to undertakings that will be implemented within 30 days after the disaster or emergency has been formally declared by the appropriate authority. An agency may request an extension of the period of applicability from the Council prior to the expiration of the 30 days. Immediate rescue and salvage operations conducted to preserve life or property are exempt from the provisions of section 106 and this part.
# EUR-Lex - 12008E334 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008E334

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - PART SIX: INSTITUTIONAL AND FINANCIAL PROVISIONS - TITLE III: ENHANCED COOPERATION - Article 334 (ex Articles 27 **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0192 - 0192 *

Article 334

(ex Articles 27a to 27e, 40 to 40b and 43 to 45 TEU and ex Articles 11 and 11a TEC)

The Council and the Commission shall ensure the consistency of activities undertaken in the context of enhanced cooperation and the consistency of such activities with the policies of the Union, and shall cooperate to that end.

--------------------------------------------------
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 189 (Friday, September 29, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 57551]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-8345]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Center for Research Resources; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Center for Research Resources 
Special Emphasis Panel, RFP NHLBI-RR-07-08 C. Elegans Contract 
Proposal SEP.
    Date: October 17, 2006.
    Time: 8:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: Bethesda Marriott Suites, 6711 Democracy Boulevard, 
Executive Board Room, Bethesda, MD 20817.
    Contact Person: Linda C. Duffy, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Office of Review, NCRR, National Institutes of 
Health, 6701 Democracy Blvd., Room 1082, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 
435-0810, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#07637261617e6b476a666e6b29696e6f29606871"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0b6f7e6d6d72674b666a626725656263256c647d">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine; 93.333; Clinical Research; 93.371, Biomedical 
Technology; 93.389, Research Infrastructure, 93.306, 93.333, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 20, 2006.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 06-8345 Filed 9-28-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of iTech Medical, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Annual Report”), I, Wayne D. Cockburn, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:





1.           The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           The information contained in this Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: April 15, 2011

/s/  Wayne D. CockburnWayne D. CockburnChief Financial Officer
Cheshire,

No. 5157.

#### Jaffrey *v.*Michael A. Heffernan *& a.*

Argued October 2, 1963.

Decided December 3, 1963.

*168
      *William D. Tribble*and *David J. KillKelley (Mr. Tribble*orally), for the plaintiff.

*Maurice M. Blodgett*(by brief and orally), for the defendants Heffernan.

*Kenneth A. Brighton*and *Richard R. Femald (Mr. Femald*orally), for Ginsburg, Wheeler and Lundberg, as *amici curiae.*

Duncan, J.

In support of their motion for judgment notwithstanding the decree, the defendants rely upon *Mayor*v. *Smyth,*64 N. H. 380 which they assert is controlling and founded upon established principles of equity. See also, *Ventnor City*v. *Fulmer,*92 N. J. Eq. 478, *aff’d*93 N. J. Eq. 660; Annot. 91 A. L. R. 315, 322. In *Mayor*v. *Smyth, supra,*383, the court dismissed a bill in equity seeking to enjoin violation of an ordinance designed to prevent the spread of fire, which required that exterior alterations of existing buildings should be of fireproof material. It appeared that the changes proposed by the defendant in the case would neither increase nor diminish the danger from fire. Since there was no evidence that the alterations would be a nuisance in fact or cause irreparable damage, the court found it unnecessary to determine the validity of the ordinance, and declined to exercise jurisdiction merely “to restrain or suppress the commission of ... [a misdemeanor].”

The plaintiff in the case before us points out that the ordinance which it seeks to enforce contains no penalty for its violation, and that the town is without adequate legal remedy. See *N. H. Board*v. *Company,*90 N. H. 368, 373.

On the former transfer, we concluded that “on the record before us the petition should be granted.” *Jaffrey*v. *Heffernan,*
      *169
      *supra,*254. See *Faulkner*v. *Keene,*85 N. H. 147, 153. The record on this transfer does not differ in any material respect from the previous record.

Cases are commonplace in which equity powers have been utilized on behalf of municipalities to compel compliance with valid zoning ordinances, even though penalties are provided for violation, and the violation is not shown to constitute a public nuisance. *Mayor &c. of Alpine Borough*v. *Brewster,*7 N. J. 42; *Lincoln*v. *Giles,*317 Mass. 185; *Lexington*v. Bean, 272 Mass. 547; *Darien*v. *Webb,*115 Conn. 581; *Garfield*v. *Young,*340 Mich. 616; *Boise City*v. *Better Homes, 72*Idaho 441, 445; *Lake Bluff*v. *Horne,*24 Ill. App. 2d 343. No reason is apparent why like principles should not apply to the enforcement of a set-back ordinance, such as is here involved, even though not a part of a comprehensive zoning ordinance. See *McCavic*v. *DeLuca,*233 Minn. 372.

We find no error in the rulings of the Trial Court.

*Exceptions overruled.*

All concurred.
§ 9.18 Surface use and patent restrictions. ( a ) The regulations in 43 CFR 3826.2-5 and 3826.2-6, 3826.4-1(g) and 3826.4-1(h), and 3826.5-3 and 3826.5-4 will apply to any claimant who wishes to take his claim to patent in Olympic National Park, Glacier Bay National Monument or Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument.
( b ) The additional provisions of 43 CFR subpart 3826 and 36 CFR 7.26 and 7.45(a) will continue to apply to existing permits until 120 days after January 26, 1977, unless extended by the Regional Director. (See § 9.10(g).
[42 FR 4835, Jan. 26, 1977, as amended at 48 FR 30296, June 30, 1983]
#### Ratje Bunke, Respondent, *v.*New York Telephone Company, Appellant.

(Argued April 11, 1907;

decided April 30, 1907.)

*Bunke v. New York Telephone Co.,*110 App. Div. 241, affirmed.

. Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered January 17, 1906, affirming a judgment of the Appellate Term which affirmed a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict in an action to recover for an alleged trespass.

*Alfred B. Cruikshank*and *John II. Cahill*for appellant.

*Thaddeus D. Kennesori*for respondent.'

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., O’Brien, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Yann, Hisoook and Chase, JJ.