FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL 

FINAL REPORT 

AUDIT OF THE COMMISSION’S 

PUBLIC DISCLOSURE PROCESS 

December 2005 

AUDIT ASSIGNMENT 02-03 
OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL 

TABLE OF CONTENTS 

DESCRIPTION PAGE 

Executive Summary ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 

Background -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 

Objectives, Scope and Methodology ----------------------------------------------------------- 6 

Audit Determinations 

Disclosure Differences Between PAC and Candidate Data ----------------------- 8 

Adequate Process in Place to Remedy Disclosure Discrepancies -------------- 12 

Conclusions -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 14 

Management’s Comments-------------------------------------------------------------------------- 16 

Appendix A: The FEC Disclosure Process -------------------------------------------------- 17 

Appendix B: FEC Form 3, Report of Receipts and Disbursements -------------- 24 

Appendix C: FEC Form 3X, Report of Receipts and Disbursements -------------- 35 

(For Other than An Authorized Committee) 
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 

In response to a request received from former Congressman Stephen Horn, the 

Office of Inspector General conducted an audit of the FEC’s public disclosure 

process. The former Congressman had expressed concern about the discrepancies 

between the amounts that political action committees (PACs) reported given to 

House and Senate candidates and the amounts that the candidates had reported 

receiving. Therefore, the primary objectives of the audit were to: 1) determine 

the extent, if any, of disclosure differences between candidate contributions 

reported by political committees and related political committee contributions 

reported received by candidates, and 2) assess whether an adequate process is in 

place to remedy any reporting discrepancies. 

The audit work was conducted between August 2002 and July of 2005. We 

performed a significant amount of background research to obtain an 

understanding of the FEC’s disclosure process. We also conducted several 

preliminary meetings with management and contacted external organizations for 

information related to the audit. In order to achieve our stated objectives, we 

reviewed pertinent documentation, conducted interviews with Commission staff, 

and performed extensive analyses of campaign finance data to identify anomalies 

and other attributes of the data. We also developed process narratives and 

flowcharts which document the functions and processes of the FEC offices 

primarily responsible for the disclosure process. 

Specifically, our audit examined the extent of disclosure differences within the 

Commission’s complex disclosure process and the magnitude of campaign 

finance data. We found that disclosure differences generally exist between the 

amounts of money reported given by a PAC and the contributions the candidate 

reported receiving. In fact, we computed a total variance of 1.2 million dollars 

between PAC contributions reported disbursed and related PAC contributions 

reported received by our judgmental sample of fifty House and Senate candidates. 

The total amount of PAC contributions reported given by the donor PACs did not 

equal the total amount of PAC contributions reported received by the fifty 

sampled candidates. Furthermore, remote users of the Commission’s disclosure 

database are not adequately made aware of potential reporting discrepancies that 

could occur among reporting entities. The disclosure database accessible from the 

FEC Web site does not warn users to be cautious when making conclusions from 

the data files in regards to a candidate’s campaign financing activity. 

A variety of campaign factors that are inherently part of the FEC’s campaign 

finance disclosure process produce disclosure differences between the amounts of 

money reported given by a PAC and the contributions the candidate reported 

receiving from the PAC. Differences between reporting entities can be attributed 

to: timing disparities, returned PAC contributions, duplicate transactions, 

1
inaccurate or incomplete reporting, inaccurate coding, the non-reporting of inkind contributions, and differences in filing requirements. 

Additionally, we found the lapse in time between PAC reported disbursements 

and candidate reported receipts of those disbursements can also cause disclosure 

differences. In fact, PAC and candidate transactions can cross over one or more 

reporting cycles. Furthermore, we found it difficult to accurately match a PAC 

disbursement with the exact candidate receipt of that PAC disbursement since the 

donor committee’s identification number is not required to be included on the 

contribution check and one PAC can be known by several different names, 

acronyms, and abbreviations. 

Overall, we believe the FEC consistently constructs, for the most part, an accurate 

depiction of financial activities based upon the participation of Congress and 

other mandated filers. To accommodate the evolving nature of the disclosure 

database, we found that the Commission has developed sound policies and 

procedures that attempt to prevent, identify, and correct reporting variances. 

Thus, the agency continually makes the data available to provide the electorate 

with the ability to make educated, informed decisions on the political process 

based in part on where candidates for federal office derive their financial support. 

However, patrons must understand that, due to the magnitude and complexity of 

the mandated disclosure system, the data must be understood before assumptions 

are made regarding a candidate’s campaign financing activities. We discovered 

that the FEC’s Web site doesn’t encourage patrons to review both sides (donor 

and recipients) before making assumptions with the numbers. Nor does the 

disclosure database effectively disclose the inherent factors that cause disclosure 

differences. Considering this, we made a few suggestions for improvement to the 

disclosure process, which are outlined at the end of this report. 

2
BACKGROUND 

Campaign Finance Legislation and the Federal Election Commission 

Between 1907 and 1966, Congress enacted several statutes in response to 

Presidential requests for legislation to ban corporate contributions for political 

purposes. These statutes sought to limit the influence of wealthy individuals on 

federal elections, regulate spending in campaigns for federal office, and prevent 

abuse by mandating public disclosure of campaign finances. Congress later 

consolidated these early reform efforts into the 1971 Election Laws - The Federal 

Election Campaign Act. 

The Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, (FECA), provides the basic 

legislative framework governing the financing of federal elections and institutes 

more stringent disclosure requirements for federal candidates, political parties, 

and political action committees (PACs). However, these initial attempts at federal 

election reform were unsuccessful without a central administrative authority to 

provide an institutional framework to oversee the campaign finance provisions of 

the law. 

In 1974, Congress amended the FECA to authorize the establishment of an 

independent regulatory agency, the Federal Election Commission (FEC or 

Commission), to administer and enforce the FECA. The mission of the FEC is to 

assure that the campaign finance process is fully disclosed and that the rules are 

effectively and fairly enforced, fostering the electorate's faith in the integrity of 

the nation's political process. Under current law, the FEC has exclusive 

jurisdiction over the civil enforcement of the FECA. 

To achieve its mission, the Commission has three core agency programs: public 

disclosure, compliance, and public financing. Specifically, these programs 

function together to facilitate public disclosure of campaign finance activity; 

encourage voluntary compliance with the disclosure and other requirements of the 

FECA; and enforce the statute through audits, investigations, and civil litigation. 

Administering and enforcing the FECA also involves implementing the public 

funding programs for Presidential campaigns and conventions. This includes 

audits of participating candidates and committees, and enforcement of public 

funding legislation. 

The environment that the FEC operates within is volatile; several external factors 

have the ability to adversely affect the Commission’s ability to achieve its 

mission. Some of these factors include: 

• the level of funding appropriated to the FEC; • significant amendments to the FECA; • significant changes in the level of competition in federal election 

3
 campaigns; 

• significant changes in the degree and intensity of fundraising for 

federal campaigns; 

• extreme changes in the general political attitude, interest, and

awareness of the electorate; and • the solvency of the Presidential Election Campaign Fund. 

All of these issues can impact the quantity of money to be regulated by the FEC 

during each election period as well as the FEC’s workload (i.e. the number of 

reports filed and transactions to be processed, the number of requests for 

information, data, and support made to the FEC, and the number of complaints 

filed with the Commission). 

Public disclosure of the sources and amounts of money used to support federal 

elections is one of the most important responsibilities of the FEC. Through the 

public disclosure program, the Commission strives to promote full and timely 

disclosure of campaign finance activity in federal elections, and to provide 

information and policy guidance on the FECA to the public, press, and those 

persons and entities required to comply with the FECA. The public uses the 

financial campaign data to evaluate the candidates running for federal office. 

Public disclosure of campaign data also allows both the public and the 

Commission to monitor compliance with federal election law. 

Requirements for the disclosure of federal campaign funds are set forth in federal 

election campaign laws and regulations. These laws require that the Commission 

publicize financial campaign data to inform and educate the public. 11 CFR 

Section 5.2 specifically states that “the Commission will make the fullest possible 

disclosure of records to the public.....” The FECA requires candidate committees, 

party committees, and PACs to register and file periodic reports (monthly or 

quarterly) with the Commission disclosing the money they raise and spend. 

Candidates must identify, for example, all PACs and party committees that give 

them contributions, and they must identify individuals who give them more than 

$200 in an election cycle. Additionally, they must disclose expenditures 

exceeding $200 per election cycle to any individual or vendor. This finance data 

is captured on the FEC Form 3 (candidate committees) or 3X (political 

committees) Report of Receipts and Disbursements and submitted to the 

Commission. Copies of these forms appear in appendix B and C. 

The Commission scans all of the paper campaign finance reports filed with the 

agency to create digital images of the documents, which are then accessible to the 

public in the FEC’s Public Disclosure Office or on the Commission’s Web site. 

In addition to the digital imaging system, the Commission codes and enters the 

information taken from campaign finance reports into the agency’s disclosure 

database. The Commission assigns each registered committee a unique 

identification number and then the information is coded so that committees are 

identified consistently throughout the database. After the reports have been 

processed, coded, and entered, the Commission’s Reports Analysis Division 

(RAD) reviews reports to track compliance with the law and to ensure that the 

4
public record provides a full and accurate portrayal of campaign finance activity. 

The Commission makes the reports it receives easily available to the public, 

usually within 48 hours after receipt. The Commission’s mandatory electronic 

filing program which began in January 2001 requires committees that receive 

contributions or make expenditures in excess of $50,000 in a calendar year, or 

expect to do so, to file their campaign finance reports electronically. For 

electronic filings, the entire process of capturing campaign summary data is 

completely automated. Reports are available for viewing within 24 hours after 

receipt. A flowchart, visually illustrating the Commission’s disclosure process for 

receiving campaign data to making it available for the public, appears in appendix 

A, The FEC Disclosure Process. 

In the summer of 2002, the Office of Inspector General received a request from 

former Congressman Stephen Horn to review how the Commission is carrying out 

its disclosure responsibilities and how the Commission can remedy reporting 

discrepancies. His office had expressed concern about discrepancies between the 

amounts that PACs reported were given to House and Senate candidates and the 

amounts that the candidates reported receiving. The Project on Government 

Oversight (POGO) report Establishing Institutional Integrity at the FEC: Ten 

Common Sense Campaign Finance Disclosure Reforms, dated March 5, 1998 

discussed these discrepancies. On March 28, 2001, POGO, an independent, 

nonprofit organization that investigates allegations of waste, fraud, and abuse in 

the federal government, released a follow-up report on this issue entitled, At the 

Federal Election Commission Things Just Don’t Add Up. 

5
OBJECTIVES, SCOPE, AND METHODOLOGY 

The objectives of this audit were to: 1) determine the extent, if any, of disclosure 

differences between candidate contributions reported by political committees and 

related political committee contributions reported received by candidates, and 2) 

assess whether an adequate process is in place to remedy any reporting 

discrepancies. Our scope included campaign finance transactions filed with the 

Commission from January 1, 1999, through July 2005. 

To obtain background information regarding campaign finance disclosure, we 

reviewed the federal laws and regulations relevant to federal election campaigns, 

such as 11 CFR, Federal Elections and U.S. Code, Title 2, Chapter 14, Federal 

Election Campaigns. We reviewed polices and procedures distributed by the 

FEC, campaign guides, pamphlets, and internal operating manuals. We 

interviewed Commission employees in the Public Disclosure Division, Data 

Coding and Entry Branches, Information Technology Division (formerly Data 

System Development Division), and the Reports Analysis Division in order to 

develop process narratives. We met with POGO personnel to discuss 

methodologies used during their review. We also examined the Commission’s 

annual legislative recommendations applicable to campaign finance disclosure 

that were submitted to Congress from 1997-2005. 

We evaluated the FEC’s Information Technology Strategic Plan for initiatives 

relating to the FEC public disclosure of campaign finance data. We examined 

closely the results of a reengineering study completed by an FEC contractor, to 

obtain background information regarding RAD’s workflow and review process. 

In addition, we conducted a telephone interview with a principal of TRKC 

Incorporated to obtain information regarding possible causes of disclosure 

variances. TRKC Incorporated is an Internet news and tracking service that assists 

media organizations, corporations, trade associations, and non-profit groups with 

data collection, storing, transmission, linking, analysis, and display of complex 

financial and political information. TRKC Incorporated specializes in working 

with data on political money moving to and from the national political arena. 

We observed the campaign finance report review process with senior campaign 

finance analysts and developed several flowcharts to visually depict the 

Commission’s entire campaign finance disclosure process in place. 

We evaluated and compared campaign data disclosed on the Commission’s Web 

site, File Transfer Protocol (FTP) files, and imaging system to determine whether 

the data is consistently presented. Also, we evaluated end-user instructions on the 

FEC Web site and for the FTP files to determine whether the Commission 

provided patrons with adequate guidance on how to manipulate and retrieve the 

campaign data available. Also, we determined whether the Web site and FTP site 

disclosed the frequency of data updates. 

6
To identify possible causes of disclosure differences between the amounts of 

money reported given by a PAC and the contributions the candidate reported 

receiving from the PAC, we judgmentally selected a sample of ten House and 

Senate candidates. For the ten House and Senate candidates sampled, we tracked 

and analyzed campaign finance transactions processed through the campaign 

disclosure system during the 1999-2000 reporting cycle. 

We expanded our sample to fifty additional House and Senate candidates to 

further examine the extent of disclosure differences between candidate 

contributions reported by political committees and related political committee 

contributions reported received by candidates. For each candidate sampled, we 

retrieved and reviewed campaign finance reports to analyze the total amount of 

PAC receipts reported during two different filing cycles or reporting periods(from 

2001 to 2004). Then, we computed the dollar value difference between the PAC 

and candidate committee data. 

To determine whether political committee and candidate transactions tend to cross 

over reporting periods or election cycles, we judgmentally selected 407 PAC 

disbursements and candidate receipt transactions filed for a randomly selected 

incumbent. For this dataset, we computed the average number of days between 

the reported disbursement and receipt of each financial transaction. 

Additionally, we judgmentally selected a sample of candidates with in-kind 

transactions to identify examples of non-reporting of in-kind contributions. 

To explore the impact of different filing requirements as they relate to returned 

checks, we also judgmentally selected and traced through the campaign reporting 

system, a sample of twelve returned checks recorded by various PACs and 

returned by the candidates. 

This audit was performed in accordance with generally accepted government 

auditing standards during the period of August 2002 through July 2005. 

7
AUDIT DETERMINATIONS 

Disclosure Differences Between PAC and Candidate Data 

The OIG audit found disclosure differences generally occur between the 

contributions reported given by a PAC and the PAC contributions the candidate 

reported receiving. As required by the FECA, the Commission successfully 

discloses financial campaign data; however, discrepancies between reporting 

entities are inherently part of the nature and design of the FEC’s campaign 

disclosure process. As a result, the amount of PAC funds reported given to 

finance elections may not be in agreement with a candidate’s actual campaign 

financing activities. 

Requirements for the disclosure of federal campaign funds are set forth in federal 

election campaign laws and regulations. These laws require that the Commission 

publicize financial campaign data to educate the public. 11 CFR Section 5.2 

specifically states that “the Commission will make the fullest possible disclosure 

of records to the public.....” In a filing cycle, nearly 8,000 registered committees 

file with the Commission. From these registered committees, the Commission 

receives between 85,000 to 90,000 reports, which contain millions of itemized 

contributions, as well as millions of itemized disbursements, receipts and other 

various payments. As acknowledged by campaign law, the Commission is 

charged with a task which is both great in magnitude and complexity. 

Within this complex disclosure process and a magnitude of campaign finance 

data, disclosure differences generally exist between the amounts of money 

reported given by a PAC and the contributions the candidate reported receiving. 

For example, we judgmentally selected a sample of fifty House and Senate 

candidates and found that none of the candidates sampled had contributions 

reported given by PACs that equaled the total contribution amount the candidate 

reported receiving from the PACs. In fact, we computed a total variance of 1.2 

million dollars between PAC contributions reported disbursed and related PAC 

contributions reported received by the fifty candidates sampled. The 1.2 million 

dollar variance represents about four percent of the total campaign activity for this 

sample of House and Senate candidates. For each candidate sampled, we 

retrieved and reviewed campaign finance reports to analyze the total amount of 

PAC receipts reported during two different filing cycles or reporting periods(from 

2001 to 2004) by each candidate with PAC reported disbursements. Then, we 

computed the dollar value difference between the PAC and candidate committee 

data. The dollar value disclosure differences among the individual transactions 

for the candidates sampled ranged from $250.00 to $189,600.00. Although 

reporting variances generally occur, users who access the disclosure database 

using the FEC Web site are not made aware of potential discrepancies. 

8
The disclosure differences between the amounts of money reported given by a 

PAC and the contributions the candidate reported receiving can be attributed to a 

number of factors inherently part of the Commission’s disclosure system. 

Timing Disparities 

One of these inherent aspects, timing disparities, we discovered while tracking 

campaign finance transactions filed for one randomly selected incumbent through 

the Commission’s disclosure process. During the 1999-2000 filing cycle, we 

determined that one candidate sampled had a disclosure difference of $15,027.00 

between the contributions reported given by PACs and the contributions his 

campaign reported receiving. We traced 407 PAC disbursement transactions to 

the candidate’s reported receipt of those contributions and found a lapse in time 

between PAC reported disbursements and candidate receipts of those 

disbursements that varied from one day to eight months. In fact, 49% of the 

disbursements reviewed took more than fifteen days before the candidate actually 

reported receipt of the PAC contribution. Of that 49%, eleven contributions took 

between three to eight months before the candidate’s campaign reported receipt of 

the contribution. Furthermore, we found that a PAC disbursement of a 

contribution may occur in one reporting period while receipt of that contribution 

could occur in another reporting period or election cycle. House and Senate 

candidates are required to disclose financial transactions quarterly; however, 

PACs are required to file at least semiannually in non-election years and at least 

quarterly in election years. PACs may elect to file monthly for either or both nonelection and election years. National party committees are required to file 

monthly for both non-election and election years. State, local and district party 

committees have the same filing frequency requirements as PAC’s with the 

exception; Party committees that engage in reportable “federal election activity” 

must file monthly. Based on these filing requirements, PAC contributions 

disbursed to House and Senate candidates may be reported monthly to the 

Commission, but the candidate committees may not report receipt of those PAC 

contributions until at least two or three months later. Therefore, different filing 

requirements as well as contributions in transit can contribute to discrepancies 

between reporting entities. 

Duplicate Transactions and In-Kind Contributions 

During the assessment of timing disparities between campaign finance 

transactions, we noted two more causes of reporting variances: duplicate 

transactions and the non-reporting of in-kind contributions. Specifically, we 

found that one candidate’s committee had reported receipts of 584 PAC 

contributions; but the contributing PACs apparently disbursed only 505 

contributions to the candidate’s campaign. After closely examining the data, we 

found that almost 100 of the PAC receipts actually reported by the candidate were 

duplicate transactions. According to FEC management, some duplicates are 

reporting errors and others are transactions actually reported twice by the 

9
reporting entity. In fact, we found that RAD has incorporated procedures that 

attempt to address duplicated transactions as well as duplicate reports discovered 

during the report review process. 

In addition to duplicates, we found in-kind contributions reported by the 

contributing PAC, but not reported by a candidate’s campaign committee. An inkind contribution is a donation of goods, services, or property offered free or at a 

less than usual and normal charge. Commission policy encourages contributing 

PACs to inform candidate committees of in-kind contributions made on their 

behalf to avoid disclosure differences and overstatements. However, we found 

twenty-six in-kind contributions, valued at over $10,940.00, reported by 

contributing PACs, but only fifteen in-kind contributions valued at $7,549.00 

were actually reported by the candidate’s campaign committee. 

Returned PAC Contributions 

Returned checks or un-cashed PAC contributions can cause discrepancies 

between the amounts that PACs report disbursing and the amount the candidate 

actually received. We found that candidates may return PAC contributions back 

to the donor committee without depositing the check. As required, the donor 

PAC would have reported the initial contribution to the Commission as a 

disbursement on Schedule B of the FEC Form 3X Report of Receipts and 

Disbursements. However, the Commission’s disclosure regulations do not require 

the recipient committee to report either the receipt or the return of the contribution 

if the original contribution is returned without being deposited. Thus, disclosure 

differences occur between the contributions reported given by the donor PAC and 

the contributions the candidate reported receiving until the donor PAC reports a 

negative disbursement in the amount of the original contribution on the Schedule 

B, Itemized Disbursements, for the next required FEC Form 3X. 

Furthermore, the Commission’s disclosure regulations do not require the PACs to 

report returned checks if it occurs within the same reporting period of the initial 

contribution. Nor do the regulations require the donor PAC to report an uncashed or returned check within a specified time. In fact, we found several uncashed or returned PAC contributions not recorded in the same reporting period or 

election cycle of the initial contribution and some were never reported as uncashed or returned. If PACs do not report a negative disbursement to offset the 

initial contribution, the candidate will continue to have a disclosure difference. 

Considering this, the FEC should inform users of the disclosure database that in 

order to obtain the total amount of PAC money contributed and used by a 

candidate, the user must review reports from both reporting entities (i.e. the 

candidate’s reports as well as the contributing PACs’ reports) before making any 

assumptions on the numbers. 

10
Coding Errors 

During the audit, we also discovered several PAC contributions inaccurately 

coded and assigned to the wrong candidate by the Commission as well as 

reporting errors made by the PAC or candidate while preparing the FEC Form 3 

or 3X Report of Receipts and Disbursements. Part of the FEC’s disclosure 

process requires the Commission to correctly match which committee the donor 

PAC intends to give the contribution to. However, the coding process can be 

complicated because a committee can be known by several different names, 

acronyms, and abbreviations used to represent the same committee. Additionally, 

some candidates have multiple committees; House and Senate, House and 

Presidential or Senate and Presidential. We found it extremely difficult to track 

PACs’ disbursement transactions to the candidate receipt of the contribution. No 

common attribute, such as the committee identification number or donor’s check 

number, was used between transactions to allow patrons or the Commission to 

accurately track disbursements to receipts. 

Agency regulations do not require that the committee identification number be 

included on the contribution check or FEC Form 3X Schedule B for Itemized 

Disbursements. Therefore, the Commission must attempt to accurately determine 

which committee the contributing PAC intends to give the contribution to without 

the committee’s full name and identification number. This means reporting errors 

and inaccurate coding of PAC contributions provide yet another potential 

opportunity for disclosure differences between PAC disbursements and candidate 

receipts. To encourage standardization, the Commission makes available free 

filing software that contains drop down menus listing committee names which, 

when selected by the filing entity, causes the name and identification number to 

be included in the electronic filing to the FEC. 

11
Adequate Process in Place To Remedy Disclosure Discrepancies 

Overall, the Commission has an adequate process in place to improve reporting 

discrepancies. As required by campaign finance law, the Commission has 

developed a disclosure system that administers the provisions of the FECA and 

includes effective policies and procedures to address potential reporting 

inconsistencies. As a result, the Commission continually produces the most 

accurate portrayal possible of Congressional candidates’ campaign financing 

activities. 

Title 2 of the United States Code, section 438, outlines the FEC’s administrative 

duties which include: prescribing of rules, regulations, and forms to carry out the 

provisions of the campaign finance laws as well as developing a filing, coding, 

and cross-indexing system consistent with the purposes of FECA. The coding 

process for paper reports sent through the mail involves reviewing key data fields 

for accuracy (such as the filing period), circling the line items that will be entered 

by the data entry staff, and assigning the appropriate codes (such as report 

coverage dates, report type). Paper reports are indexed after the manual coding 

and data entry process is completed. With electronically filed reports, summary 

campaign data is indexed automatically without staff intervention. The indexing 

of campaign data allows the user to locate reported campaign data on the FEC 

Web site by page number. Section 438 also states that the Commission must 

prepare, publish, and furnish to all persons required to file reports and statements 

under the FECA a manual recommending uniform methods of bookkeeping and 

reporting. Any recommendations for legislative action that the Commission 

considers appropriate must be transmitted to the President and to each House of 

Congress annually for approval. 

As previously stated, disclosure differences are inherently part of the 

Commission’s campaign finance disclosure system. However, the Commission 

has an adequate process in place that executes the provisions of FECA. In fact, 

the Commission’s disclosure process incorporates policy and procedures that 

attempt to prevent, identify, and correct reporting variances. 

Automated Review System and Procedures 

In coordination with the Information Technology Division (ITD), RAD developed 

and began testing an automated review or Electronic Review (E-Review) program 

in 2005. The program will automate much of the review process and replace most 

of the manual verification processes. RAD has envisioned that this program will 

produce a report that will identify any reporting discrepancies between PAC 

disbursements and candidate receipts of PAC contributions. Overall, the new EReview program will also make the review process more efficient and faster while 

at the same time identifying potential discrepancies between the contributions 

reported given by a PAC and the PAC contributions the candidate reported 

receiving. 

12
Policy and Outreach 

The FEC’s public disclosure policies and educational outreach programs work 

together to educate the electorate about various aspects of federal campaign 

finance law and to prevent disclosure differences in campaign finance data. The 

Commission continually provides extensive information and policy guidance on 

the FECA to the public, press, and those persons or entities required to comply 

with the FECA. Mandated filers as well as general users have access to campaign 

finance regulations and rules via the Internet or in person within the Public 

Disclosure Division. This material is also made available by phone or email 

request as well as from the Information Division, RAD, the Press Office, and 

Congressional Affairs. The Commission’s outreach program produces additional 

informational and educational publications such as campaign guides, brochures, 

and detailed pamphlets. Commission personnel conduct five to six campaign 

finance workshops a year to instruct filers, and monthly roundtables are held on a 

wide range of FECA issues. Commission personnel also manage a toll-free help 

line that is actively used by the public as well as the filers of campaign finance 

data. The Commission responds to over 200,000 requests for data, information, 

copies of reports or indices, and other requests for assistance each filing cycle (not 

including visits or hits on the FEC Web site). 

Request for Additional Information 

RAD reviews campaign finance reports to monitor compliance with the law and 

to ensure that the public record provides a full and accurate portrayal of campaign 

finance activity. During the report review process, a Campaign Finance Analyst 

compares financial data reported to internal polices and notes any discrepancies 

found throughout the review. These discrepancies are scrutinized by the analysts 

to determine whether additional information or corrections are needed. When an 

analyst finds that a report contains errors or suggests violations of the law, they 

send the reporting committee a Request for Additional Information (RFAI), 

allowing respondents thirty days to reply. After receipt of the letter, the 

committee treasurer can make additions or corrections to the report, which is then 

added to the public record. In fact, the Commission issues about 20,000 RFAI’s 

per election cycle to correct the disclosure database. To prevent repetitious errors 

which burden the disclosure process, the Commission usually sends out RFAIs 

within three months of receipt of the report. RAD refers apparent violations to 

the Audit Division, the Office of General Counsel, and the Alternative Dispute 

Resolution office for possible enforcement action. 

The FEC’s Web Site 

The Commission recently completed significant upgrades to the Web site as part 

of an ongoing endeavor to make campaign finance information more accessible to 

the regulated community, researchers, and the public. We found features such as 

the improved navigation and interactive pages user friendly as it allows users to 

13
tailor content to their specific needs. The new Web site search engine also allows 

the user to access those files that are word searchable. Remote users can view 

more than three million images of report pages dating back to 1993 and over two 

million database entries since 1997. Visitors to the Office of Public Disclosure at 

the FEC can also access the FEC’s Web site using public computer terminals, 

which offer search and retrieval of digital report images and access to the 

disclosure database. 

Downloadable Campaign Finance Data from the Web Site 

Users of the Commission’s Web site also have access to downloadable data files 

contained on the agency’s file transfer protocol (FTP) site. The FTP site is a data 

repository which is useful for those users who want to conduct intensive analysis 

of campaign finance data. The downloadable data files found on the FTP site are 

very large and contain contributor, candidate, committee, and summary data. 

Unlike the disclosure database which is updated nightly, some of the 

downloadable data files are updated on a weekly basis. We also found that the 

agency’s FTP site adequately warns users to be cautious when making 

conclusions from these data files in regards to a candidate’s campaign financing 

activities, whereas the disclosure database accessible from the FEC Web site does 

not. 

CONCLUSIONS 

We have found that the FEC consistently constructs, for the most part, an accurate 

depiction of financial activities based upon the participation of Congress and 

other mandated filers. However, due to a variety of factors that are inherently part 

of the campaign finance disclosure process, disclosure differences generally exist 

between the amounts of money reported given by a PAC and the contributions the 

candidate reported receiving. During the audit, we found that differences between 

reporting entities can be attributed to: timing disparities, returned PAC 

contributions, duplicate transactions, inaccurate or incomplete reporting, 

inaccurate coding, the non-reporting of in-kind contributions, and differences in 

filing requirements. To accommodate the evolving nature of the disclosure 

database, the Commission has developed sound policies and procedures that 

attempt to prevent, identify, and correct reporting variances. In addition, the 

Commission’s newly redesigned disclosure database offers simplified navigation, 

additional search tools, and use of new technology that provides users with an 

interactive experience that is tailored to their specific needs. However, the 

disclosure database accessible from the FEC Web site does not inform the user 

that reporting variances frequently occur between candidate contributions 

reported by political committees and related political committee contributions 

reported received by candidates. Nor does the Commission’s disclosure database 

14
encourage patrons to cautiously review both sides (donor and recipient) before 

making assumptions based on the numbers. 

SUGGESTIONS 

Overall, we believe adequate policies and procedures are in place to remedy 

reporting discrepancies. To improve the current system of campaign disclosure, 

we suggest the following: 

• The Commission should ensure the users and mandated filers of the FEC 

disclosure system are aware that reporting variances frequently occur 

between candidate contributions reported by political action committees 

(PACs) and related political committee contributions reported received by 

candidates. 

• The Commission should also disclose the inherent campaign finance 

factors that could cause disclosure differences between PAC and candidate 

data. 

• The Commission should explain to users that in order to obtain the total 

account of money contributed and used by a candidate, the public must 

review both sides (the candidate and the political committee’s reports) 

before making any assumptions on the numbers. 

• The Commission consider recommending to Congress that the donor 

committee’s identification number be included on the contribution check 

or FEC Form 3/3X schedule B for Itemized Disbursements to help the 

Commission accurately determine which committee the contributing 

PACs intend to give the contributions to. The Commission may also want 

to consider recommending that the same committee identification number 

be included on the recipient committee’s report. 

15
MANAGEMENT’S COMMENTS 

Management was given a draft copy of this report and provided the following 

comments: “We are pleased by the IG’s recognition that the Commission has 

developed sound policies and procedures that attempt to prevent, identify, and 

correct reporting variances. We concur with the IG’s finding that the FEC 

consistently constructs an accurate depiction of financial activities based upon 

the participation of Congress and other mandated filers. That said, I recognize 

there are areas that can be improved, and I look forward to working with you to 

implement those recommendations that will improve the current system of 

campaign finance disclosure.” Management also provided additional comments 

regarding the clarification of issues included in our draft report. Those comments 

have been incorporated, where appropriate, into our report. 

16
scanned Senate

reports 

Overnight 

electronic 

transmission 

of scanned 

Senate 

reports to 

FEC 

electronic images of Senate 

TIFF files that contain 

campaign finance reports 

 ele

Original reel 

of microfilm 

delivered to 

FEC 

TIFF image sent to archive writer 

and creates the microfilm 

Reports are 

scanned Senate Filer 

campaign 

finance 

disclosure

 report 

Secretary of

Senate

Processing Branch Processing Branch 

8 reels of 

Senate microfilm 

prepared for 

public/staff use 

Microfilm sent to lab for 

overnight 

processing 

3 copies of 

Senate 

microfilm 

Public Records 

3 copies of 

Senate microfilm

Distributed to other 

FEC offices 

2 copies of Senate 

microfilm The FEC Disclosure Process: 

Scanning and the electronic transmission of Senate reports Secretary of Senate Information Technology Division Processing Branch (Secretary of Senate filers) Page 1 

A 

(page 5)

Data Coding and

Entry Branch

17
electronic reports 

on disks 

FEC Filer 

(Presidential, 

PAC, House, 

Party and 

Nonparty) 

Electronic 

form ITD 

electronic 

reports 

via Internet 

Uploads 

data 

hardcopy of electronic 

reports 

RAD 

FEC database is 

populated with 

PASS I summary 

data 

disks 

electronic campaign 

data 

FEC database 

populated with 

itemized campaign 

data 

PASS III data 

manually 

cleared by 

assigned 

coder 

Mailroom 

The FEC Disclosure Process: 

Downloading PASS I summary data and PASS III coding of electronic campaign finance disclosure reports 

Information Technology Division(ITD) (FEC electronic filersvia disk or Internet) Page 2 

Reports Status

System is updated

18
Processing Branch 

Mailed reports 

Mailroom 

Faxed

 or emailed 

reports 

paper reports 

paper reports Secretary of

Senate

Documents 

placed 

in the 

inbox for 

document 

preparation 

Df

re

co

NO 

Staff log in 

receipt of 

all 

reports 

delivered to 

Processing 

C

ana

b

Reports 

opened, 

time 

stamped 

and the 

envelope 

is clipped 

to report 

FEC Filer 

The FEC Disclosure Process: Preparing campaign finance disclosure reports for scanning Public Disclosure Division Processing Office FEC filers (paper reports via mail, email or fax) Page 3 

19
B 

Clerk records 

date, clerk 

name and 

starting 

image 

number in log 

book 

Clerk notes 

number of 

documents 

and 

number of 

pages in log 

messenger picks 

up CD to 

deliver to 

lab 

Developer overnight processing 

Film 

developed 

and 

several 

copies are 

made 

Paper 

reports 

scanned 

and 

stamped 

with 11 

digit image 

location 

number 

Clerk copies 

images to CD 

(after the 

accumulation of 

5000 images 

which equal one 

reel of microfilm 

(approx) ) 

messenger deliv

microfilm back to 

(next day) 

Original 

paper reports 

reassembled 

and stapled 

processing 

of original report 

Processing 

clerk logs 

onto 

system, set 

scan 

function 

Quality 

check for 

imprinted 

image 

numbers 

paper reports 

processing of

.TIFF files that contain electronic

images of campaign finance reports

The FEC Disclosure Process: Disclosure reports 

posted to FEC 

Web Site 

Public Records Scanning of campaign 

finance disclosure reports filed with the FEC Public Disclosure Division Processing Branch Processing (FEC filers only) Branch Page 4 

3 copies of each r2 copies of each r

20
A 

Assigned 

staff log in 

receipt of FEC filed 

reports and sort reports 

Paper reports 

(FEC filed) 

paper copies of 

Senate reports 

PASS I Coding

and

Entry

Assigned 

staff 

perform 

PASS I 

coding of all 

campaign 

finance 

reports 

Clerk 

conducts 

PASS I 

data 

entry 

The FEC Disclosure Process: Pass I data coding and data entry of campaign finance reports Information Technology Division(ITD) Data Coding and Entry Branch (Paper reports - Senate filed and FEC filed) Page 5 

C 

(page 6) 

21
C 

Paper report 

(Senate filed) 

Program identifies 

inconsistent 

entries by 

line number 

Computer 

compares data 

( Data entry error 

found?) 

Data entry 

clerk 

conducts 

PASS I 

Data entry 

PASS I 

summary 

data 

transmitted 

Paper report 

(FEC filed) 

Assigned

 staff perform 

PASS I 

coding of all 

campaign 

finance 

reports 

Data 

entry 

clerk rekeys 

data to 

verify 

accuracy 

yes 

FEC Database 

Does the report include 

detailed itemized 

transactions? 

no 

Data Coding and

Entry Branch

The FEC Disclosure Process: PASS I data verification of campaign finance reports Data Coding and Entry Branch (Paper FEC and Senate filers) Page 6 

RAD 

22 
D 

PASS III 

Coding 

Clerk verifies 

correct ID# 

for each 

transaction 

and reviews 

key data 

fields 

The FEC Disclosure: PASS III coding, verification and entry Information Technology Division(ITD) Data Coding and Entry Branch (Paper reports FEC and Senate filers) PAGE 7 

Data entry 

contractor 

Contractor 

performs 

PASS III 

data entry 

Contractor 

performs data 

entry ? 

yes 

messenger 

picks up and delivers 

batched reports

 Data Coding 

and Entry 

Branch* 

Reports 

batched to be 

delivered to 

contractor 

messenger 

picks up and delivers 

batched reports 

Clerk circles 

and codes 

line items to 

be keyed 

Clerk 

conducts data 

entry and 

verification of 

PASS III data 

FEC 

CAMPAIGN 

DISCLOSURE 

DATABASE 

update system data 

update system data 

*Staff routinely perform 

detailed procedures to verify 

accuracy and completeness of 

all PASS III reports sent to the 

data entry contractor. 

no 

23
I 

7 

Appendix B 

REPORT OF RECEIPTS FEC AND DISBURSEMENTS FORII' *	 I "31 For An ~uthubbdCommittee 

Office Uae Only 

mpa%?y ~"(*,"""""" 

1.	 

COMMITEE 

NAME OF 

(in full) 

TYPE OR PRINT v 

over 

Example: 

the lines. 

~f typing, hip. f-I 

&A rarr?i~~bx4, 

2FE4

w% 

M5 

-wsx~~, 

7 .a ,- 4

ADDRESS (number and street) l i l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l 1 , : It I l l l l I ! i 

v 
 I 	 I 

I l l l l l l i l l i l l l l i l l l I I I I I I I ! l l l l l l l 

Check if different 

than previously 

reported. (ACC) 1 1 1 1 l ~ l l i l ~ ~ l ~ Ii l !L.LlJAJ-m 

A 
 

2. 	 FEC IDENTIFICATION NUMBERI cmA STATE ZIP CODE A 

STAE r DISTRICT """" 	 Yw""~as~l$.g.m c< d"&"4C m* ism 

fCi " i! 3. IS MIS 	 fl MENDED > ev' 	 r h*&.c--r x4-**'4 an=&,aR**mr 	 REPORT (A) !-LJ I 

4.	 TYPE OF REPORT (Choose One) @) 12-Day PRE-Election Report for the: 

(a) 	 Quarterly Reports: P7 	 ** 

Primary (12P) f7 General (12G) f i Runoff (12R) 

April 15 Quarterly Report (QI) em* p"r 

t4 	 -a" 

Convention (12C) Special (12s) - ,

. . July 15 Quarterly Report (Q2) 4 sb. 

+­ 2-
 I I 	 in the 

A~ + October 15 Quarterly Report ((23) Election on gmd 1 hsiv --- = 

I: State of 

1"$ 
 

Lw 8 January 31 Year-End Report (YE) (c) 30-Day POST-Election Report for the: 
 

Y""'
 i General (30G) Runoff (30R) Special (30s) 

, 

) 'I 

y Termination Report (TER) RI""*,.:

M-M! I in the 

Election on I_:,.. I State of 

<?Mrm<:sb; 

$M'MiljD Dl1 

5. 	 Covering Period 	 through , e,,.,., ,,,,.,l $ 

Icedi@ that Ihave examined this Report and to the best of my knowledge and belief it is true, correct and complete. 

Type or Print Name of Treasurer 

Signature of Treasurer 	 Date 

NOTE: Submission of false, erroneous, or incomplete Information may subject the person signing this Report to the penalties of 2 U.S.C. S437g. 

Office 

L Use 	 FEC FORM 3 

Only 	 (Revised 0212003) A

FE5AN018 
-- - 

Appendix B 

r 	 

FEC Fonn 3 (Revlsed 0212003) of Receipts 

SUMMARY 

and Disbursements 

PAGE 

Page 2 

1


Write or Type Committee Name 

I 

Report Covering the Pen'od: From: 

COLUMN A COLUMN B 

Thls Period I Election Cycle-to-Date 

6. 	 Net Contributions (other than loans) 

(a) 	 Total Contributions 
 

(other than loans) (from Line Il(e)) .... 
 

@) 	 Total Contribution Refunds 
 

(from Line 2qd)) .................................. 
 

(c) 	 Net Contributions (other than loans) 
 

(subtract Line 6@)from Line 6(a)) ...... 
 

7. 	 Net Operating Expenditures 

(a) 	 Total Operating. Expenditures 

(from Line 17)...................................... 
 

@) 	 Total Offsets to Operating 
 

Expenditures (from Line 14)................ 
 

(c) 	 Net Operating Expenditures 
 

(subtract Line 7@) from Line 7(a)) ...... 
 

8. 	 Cash on Hand at Close of 

Reporting Period (from Line 27) ................. 

9. 	 Debts and Obligations Owed TO 

the Committee (Itemize all on 

Schedule C andfor Schedule D) ................ 

10. Debts and Obligations Owed BY 

the Committee (Itemize all on 

Schedule C and/or Schedule D) ................ 

For further information contact: 

Federal Election Commission 
 

999 E Street, NW 
 

Washington, DC 20463 
 

Toll Free 800-424-9530 
 

Local 202-694-1100 
 
Appendix B 

r 	 DETAILED SUMMARY PAGE 1


FEC Fonn 3 (Aevlsed 12/2003) of Receipts Page 3 
 

Wrke or 'lrype Committee Name 
 

<.-"$9 	llX*R6

M * M ; I T"D~ I "vTv'" 
 ?-,

Report Covering the Period: From: iGd4 	 L,,&J k
 4 	 s%w q%%%w a ' 1 To: 

COLUMN A 	 COLUMN B I. RECEIPTS 	 Total Thls Period Electlon Cycle-to-Date 

11. CONTRlBUTlONS (other than loans) FROM: 

(a) 	 Individuals/Persons Other Than 
 

Political Committees 
 

(1) 	 Itemized (use Schedule A) ........... 
 

01) 	Unitemized.................................... 
 (lii) TOTAL of contributions 
 

from individuals ....................... b 
 

@) 	 Political Party Committees................. 
 (c) 	 Other Political Committees 

(such as PACs)................................... 
 

(d) 	 The Candidate.................................... 
 (e) 	 TOTAL CONTRIBUTIONS 
 

(other than loans) 
 

(add tines ll(a)(lii), (b), (c), and (d)).. 
 

5%~" 12. TFWNSFERS FROM OTHER 	 " .*y:s 

AUTHORIZED COMMITEES .................... 4 sm .,*v'&#z&<s~?~ \& \<,*, , >+$& 

13. LOANS: 

(a)	 Made or Guaranteed by the 

Candidate............................................ 
 

@) 	 All Other Loans................................... 
 (c) 	 TOTAL LOANS 
 

(add tines 13(a) and (b)).................... 
 

14. OFFSETS TO OPERATING 

EXPENDITURES 

(Refunds, Rebates, etc.) ............................ 

15. OTHER RECEIPTS 	 re. .........%~~w~,T:w=e,w-tm.,v,.m.w.wx,~w. s...,,..em >ir,.-.y 

p- I 

(Dividends, Interwit, etc.) ........................... 	 I - ......... ,a Jhwm&ma& ..... *t!....%d ?.,. .A ...."~4~~ . %bk


16. 	 TOTAL RECEIPTS (add Lines 

ll(e), 12, 13(c), 14, and 15) b (Carry Total to Line 24, page 4) ............ 
Appendix B 

DETAILED SUMMARY PAGE 	 7 
 

FEC Form 3 (Revised W2003) of Disbursements 

11. DISBURSEMENTS 	 COLUMN A I COLUMN B 

Total This Period 	 Election CrcIcto-Dab 

17. OPERATING EXPENDITURES ..................... 


18. TRANSFERS TO OTHER 

AUTHORIZED COMMIllEES ..................... 

19. 	 LOAN REPAYMENTS: 

(a) 	 Of Loans Made or Guaranteed 

by the Candidate ................................. 

(b) 	 Of All Other Loans .............................. 
 (c) 	 TOTAL LOAN REPAYMENTS 

(add Lines 19(a) and (b))..................... 

20. 	 REFUNDS OF CONTRlBUTlONS TO: 

(a) 	 Indlviduals/Persons Other 

Than Political Committees .................. 

(b) 	Political Party Committees .................. 
 (c) 	 Other Political Committees 

(such as PACs).................................... 

(d) 	 TOTAL CONTRlBUTlON REFUNDS 

(add Unes 20(a), @), and (c)) .............. 

21. 	 OTHER DISBURSEMENTS ......................... 


+ 22. 	 TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS --w% - r n ~ R s n uYp*q&m m ~ ~y-w ~ -9 9% ->-.a. pms v, y I--, 

(add tines 171 189 l9(~)* 2~). and 21) t L -4- a,,,edLkwz 

8 r 

L , ~ ~ -8-A~wra ~ ­

Ill. CASH SUMMARY 

23. CASH ON HAND AT BEGINNING OF REPORTING PERIOD ............................................... 


24 TOTAL RECEIPTS THIS PERIOD (from tine 16, page 3) ..................................................... 


25. 	 SUBTOTAL (add Line 23 and Line 24) .................................................................................. 


26. 	TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS MIS PERIOD (from Line 22) .................................................... 


27. 	 CASH ON HAND AT CLOSE OF REPORTING PERIOD 

(subtract Line 26 from Line 25) .............................................................................................. 

Appendix B 

SCHEDULE A (FEC Form 3) 

Urnits Increased Due to Opponent's 

Spending (2 U.S.C. $#la0/441a-1) 

Amount of Each Receipt this Period rm7....-,..­ ,\x;x--I.IY*UII+-PU- yn%y%y'"'h""- \ 

8 ' I 9 

lm,a&,&#mss;.*,.?,I, 4 f?%-:,9 .,~BvA ,#,. ,****,",-& :


j""] Limits increased Due to Opponent's 

B,,,fispending (2 U.S.C. wla0/44la-l) 

Lirnits increased Due to Opponent's 

Spendlng (2 U.S.C. $441a0/441a-1) 

FEC Schoduk A (Form 3) (Revised 0212003) 

28 
Appendix B 

FOR UNE NUMBER: LPAGE OF SCHEDULE B (FEC Form 3) 	 Use separate &edule(s) (chedc only one)

ITEMIZED DISBURSEMENTS 	 for each catsgory of the 17 18 I~a IS^ Deta#ed Summary Page 20a 20b 	 20c 21 I 

Any information copied ftw'~such Reports and Statements may not be odd or used by any person for the purpose of sdlclting contrlbutlons 
 

or for cornmerclal purposes, other than using the name and eddress of any political committee to solicit contrlbutlons from such committee. 
 

NAME OF COMMilTEE (in Full) 

v 	 I 

Full Name (Last, First, Middle Initial) 

A. 	 Date of Disbursement 

Mailing Address 	 f a*- s . ea*\a 

cb 	 State Zip Code Amount of Each Disbursement this Period 

$.-q'""w?pwFa*-9- w-S.?$811VI *at* 2- " -lfi 

Purpose of Disbursement 	 5 sx -&mww*&~,~-<w &*-3 

Candidate Name Category/ 
 

Type Refund or Disposal of Excess 
 

Dlsbwsement For: n Contributions Required Under 
 

npdmatv n~eneral 11 C.F.R. 400.53 
 

0President uother is~&G 
 

State: District 
 

Full Name (Last, First, Middle inltlal) 
 

B. 	 I Date of Disbursement 

Mailing Address 

I 

City 	 State LIPCode Amount of Each Disbursement this Period 

Pwpose of Disbursement 	 [w-q*l 4

*g 

L*%&&,&A Candidate Name Catesorv/ 
 

Type . Refund or Dlsposal of Excess 
 Office Sought: -" House Disbursement For: ":ntributlons Required Under 
 

Senate Primary C]General L&


-	 11 C.F.R. 400.53 


-

Prasldent other (spew) v 
 

State: District 
 

Full Name (Last, First, Middle initial) 
 

Date of Dlsbursement 
 

Mailing Address 

city 	 State Up Code Amount of Each Disbursement this p&od rvw-!p~v~7~ ,*";**$. * ~ W r - s?~ i *

Purpose of Disbursement 

Candidate Name 	 Category/ 

we , , 	 Refund or Disposal of Excess 

Office Sought: i

-	House Disbursement For: * Contributions Required Under 
 

Senate Primary CZ]General 
 11 C.F.R. 400.53 ... 
 

, President other (specify) 
 

State: Estrict: 

SUBTOTAL of Disbursements This Page (optional) ................................................................. b 
 

TOTAL This Period Qast page this line number only) .............................................................. b ....... .dA:.- . --a ....... r:2., 
...;... .#... ­
 ... ;.
 

FEC &h.duk B (Fonn 3) (Revised 0212003) 

29 

'.,.4 
Appendix B 

SCHEDULE C (FEC Form 3) 

Amount of Loan ""'"~A~W'r~r~yW~rrr:::r~ 

Date Incumed 

FEC Sch.duk C (Form 3)(Revised 0212003) 

30 
Appendix B 

SCHEDULE C-I (FEC Form 3) 
 

LOANS AND LINES OF CREDIT FROM LENDING INSTITUTIONS 
 

LENDING INSTlNTlON (LENDER) Interest Rate (AIR) 

FEC Schedule C-I (Fonn 3) (Revised 0212003) 
Appendix B 

SCHEDULE D (FEC Form 3) (useseperete 

1 PAGE OF 

schedule(a) FOR LINE NUMBER: DEBTS AND OBLIGATIONS for each (check only one) 9 

Excluding Loans numbered Ilne) 10 

NAME OF COMMillEE (In Full) 

A. Full Name (Last, First, Middle Initial) of Debtor or Creditor Nature of Debt (Purpose): 

Malllng Address 
 

city State Zip Code 
 

Outstanding Balance Beginning Thls Period 
 

Payment This Period Outstanding Balance at Close of This Period ,w.e-. $M.<*."Z*-p , * y--F-'-p-y-yy"-g +-'.gxz-. T " " y - ~ ? ~ - " v ~ " x s p m I m p I m p ~ ,*~mcm.~..v~yA.*~.::~~*$~~s~~
 3.~~.~..~@P~*W.<>~ ->* .%<,.,< . . 1 r I r,' i

a>e& mww. &,a~~:~~rrf!ni*~~x~.?i~m~ &ncut~-AA i)rr.,~itl,c~Bif a,d#A..=.%,w+u is-. ,.. r ..-. ii-*~G"F~~~~.,~

8. Full Name (Last, Rrst, MMdle Inltlal) of Debtor or Credltor Nature of Debt (Purpose): 

Mailing Address 
 

city State Zip Code 
 

Payment This Period 

FEC Schedule D (Form 3) (Revised 02/2003) 

FE5AN018 
Appendix B 

FEC FORM 32 (File with Form 3) 
 

CONSOLIDATION REPORT OF RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENTS 
 

(To Be Used By A Principal Campaign Committee) 
 

Name of Principal Campaign Committee (In Full) 	 Report Covering Period: 
 

From: To:
 )"*7 xiq I 

a>&.z=*a 

(a) @)

bne No. 11 (a) bne No. 11 @) 

Commtttee Name Total Contributions From Total Contributwxls 

IndlvJPerwns Other Than From Pditlcal Party 

Pditlcal Committees Commntees 

A 

B Column Total Last Page Only............................................................................................................. 
 

(c) (dl (0) 0 (a) Q 

Line No. 11 (c) bne No. 11(d) Line No. 11(e) Une No. 12 bne No. 13(4 Une No. 13@) 

Total Contrhtms Total conmutiw Totel Total Trnnsfers Total Loans Made or Total All 

From Other Pokcal horn The Contributions From Other Authorked Guar8riteed by other Loans 

Comm CanckdPte Committees the Candtdate 

A 

B 

0 Q (k) (0 (m) (n) 

bne No 13(c) bne No. 14 bne No 15 bne No 16 Clne No. 17 bne No. 18 

Total Total Offsets to Total Total Total Total Transfers to 

Loans operating Other Receipts Operat~ng Other Authomed 

Expenditures Reca~pts Expendkures CommHtees 

A 

B 

(0) (P) (a (0 (s) 	 0) I-me No. 19(a) LIW NO bne ~o.I~(c) NO. 20(4 une NO. wb) une NO 2qc) L"&REc Total Loan Repayments Total Loan Total Contnbutm Total ConMbutm Total Contribution

l~@) 	 ~ne 

Guaranteed by The Can- of All Other Loans Repayments Refunds to Refunds to Polklcal Refunds to Other 

dldate IndlvtduaWersons Party Cornmlttees Pditical CommRtees 

A 

B 

(u) (v) (w) Q 64 Q 

bne No 2qd) bne No. 21 Line No 22 Line No 23 Clne No 27 Line No. 9 

Total Total Other Total Cash on Hand Cash on Hand Debto & Obltgatw 

Contnbut~on 	 Dlsbursernents Dmbmnts Beginning of Ckse of Owed TO the 

Refunds Reporting Penod Repott~ngPenod CommMee 

A 

B 

(aa) @b) (=) 
 

bne No 10 Line No. 6(c) Une No. 7(c) 
 

Debts 8 Obhgatms Net Contnbutiins Net Operatmng 
 

Owed BY the Expendlturee 
 

Commmw 
 

A 

B 

FEC Fonn32 (Revised 0212003) 
Appendix B 

FEC FORM 32-1 

CONSOLIDATED REPORT OF GROSS RECEIPTS FOR AUTHORIZED COMMITTEES (11 CFR 104.19) 

(Millionaires' Amendment) 

I Name of Candidate Candidate ID Number 1 

a 

L,L&sl,,,,, 3- &,&,,, * ". " <~ 

Name of Principal Campaign Committee Committee ID Number * 

dm,"&&, &*m&*AA 8 &-v 'J 

Committee Address 

City State ZIP 

Report Covering Period (check one) through June 30, or rl through December 31 of the year L wt 

preceding the year of the general election 

Primary General 

1. Gross receipts of authorized *~4*$*v$~m~c~~.~~Gv,~.P.L.~~ s'w .*.*=~?-,w!&<? $a"-exA. *Z>,W." .'./'A,, .. s * . e . v , 

committees............................................ i" .&--a,.4@bW3,,,,M, ~ s ,.*,.., 4L-*.2k ~ 


P z*~ yi - ;L -* *qwu '-%'-%'-%'-%'> -* v n sw *-9 *.* - 5

2. Aggregate amount of contributions ~ w~,nan~~~-p~~arra~xaai, 

from personal funds of the candidate ... ! hLwa-w8 L.dw i-4~­I -aw&.. w..-r -A i

-***w*" +*mi'li ,*%n*$ a~.~>a~-* .nr, ry,r*% na- m>*w 3. Gross * receipts minus the candidate's ;"y'*"p *""*'+""" 

"' s e


personal contributions ........................... ;,& ,,,, -,,,,,,. e4Lh-mr,d U. am^^...- -.&, a*? .A, 
 

FEC Fonn 32-1 (Revised 0212003) 
Appendix C 

r 	 REPORT OF RECEIPTS FEC AND DISBURSEMENTS FORM 3X For Other Than An Authorized Committee 

OMce Use Only 

1. 	 NAME OF TYPE OR PRINT v Example: If typing, type 

COMMIlTEE (in full) over the lines. 

(1 Check if different II1II1 IIIIIIIIIIIlIIILIIII1III111 than previously 
 

reported. (ACC) Illllllllllllllllll IIiLlJ-~ 

2. 	 FEC IDENTIFICATION NUMBER V CITY A 	 STATE A ZIP CODE A 

3. 	 IS THIS NEW AMENDED 

REPORT 0 (N) OR (A) 

4. 	 TYPE OF REPORT (b) Monthly 1Fab 20 (M2) May 20 (M5) a Aug 20 (Ma) Nov 20 (MI 1) 

(Choose One) 	 Report tEzF
 Due On: 
 

MU 	 20 (~3) Jun 20 (M6) Sep 20 (M9) Dec 20 (M12) 

(a) 	 Quarterly Reports: 	 i!zlW+-im 
 Ye= W)

Apr 20 (M4) Jul 20 (M7) a Oct 20 (MIO) C1/ Jan 31 (YE) 

April 15 	 lj Quarterly Report (Q1) 	 (c) 12-Day Primaty (12P) a General (12.) a Runoff(12R)
 r''S July 15 PRE-Election
 Quarterly Report (Q2) Report for the: Convention (12C) n special (12s) 

i?i October 15 marte* Wrt 

CI 4E$%3Aeport (YE) 

.I4 31 Mid-Year (d) 30-Day
 Report (Non-election 
 POST-Election a General (30G) a Runoff (3OR) 13 Spedal (30s) Year Only) (MY) 

Report for the: 
 

p'"% Termination Report 
 Ld (TER) 
 

Election on 	 State of 

5. 	 Covering Period 	 through a 
 

I certify that I have examined this Report and to the best of my knowledge and belief it is true, correct and complete. 

Signature of Treasurer 	 Date 

NOTE: Submission of false, erroneous, or incomplete information may subject the person signing this Report to the penalties of 2 U.S.C. 54379. 

Office 	 FEC FORM 3X 

L Use 	 A Rev. 1212004 onhl 
Appendix C 

r 	 SUMMARY PAGE 

OF RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENTS 

FEC Form 3X (Rev. 02J20031 Paae 2 

Write or Type Committee Name 

Repat Covering the Period: From: 	 CZ] ' To: 

COLUMN A 

Thls Perlod 

COLUMN B 

Calendar Year-to-Date 

6. 	 (a) Cash on Hand 

January 1, 

(b) 	 Cash on Hand at 
 

Beginning of Reporting Period ............ 
 

(c) 	 Total Receipts (from Line 19) ............. 
 

(d) 	 Subtotal (add Lines 6(b) and 
 

6(c) for Column A and Lines 
 

6(a) and 6(c) for Column 8)............... 
 

7. 	 Total Disbursements (from Line 31) ........... 
 

8. 	 Cash on Hand at Close of 

Reporting Period 

(subtract Line 7 from Line 6(d)) ................. 

9. 	 Debts and Obligations Owed TO 

the Committee (Itemize all on 

Schedule C andlor Schedule D) ................ 

10. 	 Debts and Obligations Owed BY 

the Committee (Itemize all on 

Schedule C andlor Schedule D) ................ 

El This committee has qualified as a multicandidate committee. (see FEC FORM 1M) 

For further lnformatlon contact: 

Federal Election Commission 
 

999 E Street, NW 
 

Washington, DC 20463 
 

Toll Free 800-424-9530 
 

Local 202-694-1 100 
 
Appendix C 

r 	 DETAILED of SUMMARY Receipts PAGE 1

FEC Form 3X (Rev. 0212003) 	 Page 3 

Write or Type Committee Name 

Report Covering the Period: From: 

I. Recelpts 

11. 	 Contributions (other than loans) From: 

(a) 	 lndividualsPersons Other 
 

Than Political Committees 
 

(i) Itemized (use Schedule A)............ 
 

(ii) Unitemized..................................... 
 (iii) TOTAL (add 

Lines ll(a)(i) and (ii)................., 

(b) 	 Political Party Committees.................. 
 (c) 	 Other Political Committees 

(such as PACs).................................... 
 (d) 	 Total Contributions (add Lines 

ll(a)(iii), (b), and (c)) (Carry 

Totals to Line 33, page 5) .............., 

12. Transfers From AffiliatedIOther 

Party Committees........................................ 

13. All Loans Received..................................... 
 

14. 	 Loan Repayments Received....................... 
 15. Offsets To Operating Expenditures 

(Refunds, Rebates, etc.) 

(Carry Totals to Line 37, page 5)............... 16. 	 Refunds of Contributions Made 

to Federal Candidates and Other 

Political Committees.................................... 17. 	 Other Federal Receipts 

(Dividends, Interest, etc.) ............................ 18. Transfers from Non-Federal and Levin Funds 

(a) Non-Federal Account 

(from Schedule H3) ............................. 

(b) Levin Funds (from Schedule H5) ......... 
 

(c) Total Transfers (add 18(a) and 18(b)).. 

19. 	 Total Receipts (add Lines ll(d), 

12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, and 18(c))........., 

COLUMN A COLUMN B 

Total Thk Period I
 Calendar Year-to-Date I 

mmpt 	% 

20. 	 Total Federal Receipts as--..VVJ * - P'.v z: wAwwa %,w +M~%-*, 

i 	 

(subtract Line 18(c) from Line 19) ........., *B*,? '1 * 	 , & *,.,. *-a.i., & ,,vM.,.v -r, .% -x" :
Appendix C 

I 

DETAILED SUMMARY PAGE 1

of Disbursements 

FEC .-.......... Farm 3X (Rev. ,..-..02M)OS\ --. ----, 	 -


II. Disbursements 	 COLUMN A COLUMN B 

Total This Period 	 Calendar Year-to-Date 

21. 	 Operating Expenditures: 

7 z 

Activity (from Schedule H4) 

(i) 	Federal Share ............................. 
 

(ii) 	 Non-Federal Share...................... 
 (b) 	 Other Federal Operating 

Expenditures....................................... 
 (c) 	 Total Operating Expenditures 
 

(add 21(a)(i), (a)(ii), and (b)) .............b 
 

22. 	 Transfers to AffiliatedtOther Party 

Committees................................................. 
 23. 	 Contr~butionsto 

Federal CandidatesCommittees 

and Other Political Committees................. 
 24. 	 Independent Expenditures 

26. 	 Loan Repayments Made............................ 
 

27. 	 Loans Made................................................ 
 28. 	 Refunds of Contributions To: 

(a) 	 lndnndualslPersonsOther 

Than Political Committees ................. 
 

(b) 	 Political Party Committees ................. 
 (c) 	 Other Political Committees 
 

(such as PACs)................................... 
 

(d) 	 Total Contribution Refunds 
 

(add Lines 28(a), (b), and (c))........... b 
 

29. 	 Other Disbursements................................. 
 

30. 	 Federal Election Activity (2 U.S.C. §431(20)) 

(a) 	 Allocated Federal Election Activity 
 

(from Schedule H6) 
 

(i) Federal Share ................................ 
 

(ii) "Levin" Share ................................ 
 (b) 	 Federal Election Activity Paid Entirely 
 

Wih Federal Funds................. 
 (c) 	 Total Federal Election Activity (add .. 
 Lines 30(a)(i), 30(a)(ii) and 30(b))....b 
 

31.	 Total Disbursements (add Lines 21(c), 22, 

23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28(d), 29 and 30(c)).. 

32. 	 Total Federal Disbursements 

(subtract Line 2l(a)(ii) and Line 30(a)(ii) 

from Line 31)...........................................b 
 
Appendix C 

DETAILED SUMMARY PAGE 

I of Disbursements I 
 

FEC Form 3X (Rev. 02t2003) Page 5 
 

Ill. Net ContributlonsK)~eratlna- Ex- COLUMN A COLUMN B 

pendltures Total This Period Calendar Yearto-Dato 

33. 	 Total Contributions (other than loans) 

(from Line Il(d), page 3) .......................... 34. 	 Total Contribution Refunds 

(from Line 28(d)) ........................................ 
 35. 	 Net Contributions (other than loans) 

(subtract Line 34 from Line 33) ................ 36. 	 Total Federal Operating Expenditures 

(add Line 21(a)(i) and Line 21(b)) ......... 37. 	 Offsets to Operating Expenditures 

(from Line 15, page 3) .............................. 38. 	 Net Operating Expenditures 

(subtract Line 37 from Line 36) ..............): 
--

Appendix C 

SCHEDULE A (FEC Form 3X) 	 FOR LINE NUMBER: 1 PAGE OF 

Use separate schedule(s) (check only one) ITEMIZED RECEIPTS for each category of the 

Detailed Summary Page 12 

16 n17 

Any informatbn copied from such Reports and Statements may not be soM or used by any person for the purpose of soliciting contributions 


or for commercial purposes, other than using the name and address of any political committee to mliclt contributions from such committee. 


NAME OF COMMllTEE (In Full) 

v 	 I 

Full Name (Last, First, Middle Initial) 

A. 	 Date of Receipt

Mailing Address m'm' city State Zip Code 


Amount of Each Receipt thls Period 


FEC ID number of contributing 


federal political committee. 


Name of trnployer 	 I Occupation 

Receipt For: Aggregate Year-to-Datev 


Primary General 


!JOther (specify) v I 	 I 


Full Name (Last, First, Middle Initial) 

6. 	 Date of Receipt 

Mailing Address I I 

FEC ID number of contributing 


federal political committee. 


Name of tmpbyer 	 Occupation 

Name of tmpioyer Occupation 

Receipt For: Aggregate Year-to-Date V 

Primary General 

SUBTOTAL of Receipts This Page (optional)............................. ............................................... 
 .'~CB'~-~s>q* ,,ii

TOTAL This Period (last page this line number only)............................................................... b $~L,~>~ w>&& %.*..A&\dV 

$ 
 *w.* >%-3*~-& .$:*& .*.&

FEC Schedule A (Form 3X) Rev. 0212003 

40 

1 
Appendix C - - .---- -.- - .--- - .-. SCHEDULE B (FEC Form 3X) 
 

ITEMIZED DISBURSEMENTS 
 

Date of Disbursement 

FEC Schedule B (Form 3X) Rev. 0212003 

41 
Appendix C 

SCHEDULE C (FEC Form 3X) 

LOANS 	 Use separate schedule(s) 
 

for each category of the 
 

Detailed Summaty Page FOR LINE 13 OF FORM 3X 

NAME OF COMMITTEE (In Full) 

CE Full Name (Last, Flrst, Middle Initial) tkWn: 

Primary 

General 

Mailing Address 	 Other (specify) 

1 City 	 State ZIP Code 

Original Amount of Loan 	 Cumulative Payment To Date Balance Outstanding at Close of This Period 

TERMS 
 

Date Due Interest Rate Secured: 
 

m'r""r' 	 % (apr) nyes 13NO 

List All Endorsers or Guarantors (if any) to Loan Source 

1. kull Name (Last, klrst, Middle Initial) 	 Name of Employer 

I 	 I 

Mail~ngAddress 	 Occupation 

I 

2. Full Name (Last, I-lrst, Middle Initlal) 	 Name of tmployer 

I 

Malllng Address 	 Occupation 

I 

3. Full Name (Last, tlrst, Mlddle lnltial) 	 Name of tmployer 

Ma~lngAddress 	 Occupation 

4. tull Name (Last, t-lrst, Mlddle Inlt~al) 	 Name of tmployer 

I 

Malllng Address 	 Occupation 

SUBTOTALS This Period This Page (optional).............................................................. b W+.,.,.l,,,,,b~~;~,h~~..!k,,~~,,,~,r.,.
 "Y~.? tag.urvmvslFag.ur'r'r'r'y-w2.9'"9'"9'"9'"9'"9'" yw.>',,~,.". ,, as2 .,, 

TOTALS This Period (last page in his line only)..................................................... b 
 <m+AAe 

I Carry outstanding balance only to LINE 3, Schedule Dl for thls llne. If no Schedule Dl carry forward to appmprlate llne of Summary. I 

FEC Schdulr C (Form SX) Rev. 02/2003 

1-

Appendix C - . - - -- - - --- - - -­ SCHEDULE Gl (FEC Form 3X) 
 

LOANS AND LINES OF CREDIT FROM LENDING INSTITUTIONS 
 

LENDING INSTKUTION (LENDER) 	 Amount of Loan 

Date Incurred or Established 

Date account established: 

I. TO BE SIGNED BY THE LENDING INSTITUTION: 

I.	 To the best of this institution's knowledge, the terms of the loan and other information regarding the extension of the loan 

are accurate as stated above. 

II.	 The loan was made on terms and conditions (including Interest rate) no more favorable at the time than those imposed for 

FEC Schedule GI (Fonn 3X) Rev. 02i2003 

43 
Appendix C 

SCHEDULE D (FEC Form 3X) 

DEBTS AND OBLIGATIONS 

f "'mq ""'NM-,?v*m" .y&wp&m~m~ 

2) TOTALS This Period (last page this line number only) ......................................................b 
 

FEC Schedule D (Fonn 3X) Rev. 02i2W3 
Appendix C 

SCHEDULE E (FEC Form 3X) 

ITEMIZED INDEPENDENT EXPENDITURES PAGE OF 

FOR LINE 24 OF FORM SX 

NAME OF COMMITTEE (In Full) FEC IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 

- Check if ~2Chournotice I 14&hour notice 


Full Name (Last, First, Middle Initial) of Payee Date 


Mailing Address 

Amount 

State Zip Code 

I [3PresMent Name of Federal Candidate Supported or Opposed by Expenditure: 

Check One: C]Support UOppose - 1

Calendar Year-To-Date Per Election Disbursement For: C]Primary General 

for Office Sought Other (specify) , I 

Full Name (Last, First, Middle Initial) of Payee Date 

Mailing Address rlFml 

Calendar Year-To-Date Per Election Disbursement For: C]Primary General 

for Office Sought aher (specify) , 

(a) SUBTOTAL of Itemized Independent Expenditures............................................................ b 


I (b) SUBTOTAL of Unitemized Independent Expenditures........................................................b 

(c) TOTAL Independent Expenditures .......................................................................................b 

Under penalty of perjury I certify that the independent expenditures reported herein were not made in cooperation, consultation, or concert 

with, or at the request or suggestion of, any candidate or authorized committee or agent of either, or (if the reporting entity is not a political 

party committee) any political party committee or its agent 

Date 


Signature 


FEC Schedule E (Form 3X) Rev. 02/'2003 
Appendix C 

SCHEDULE F (FEC Form 3X) 

ITEMIZED COORDINATED PARTY EXPENDITURES MADE BY 

POLITICAL PARTY COMMrrl'EES OR DESIGNATED AGENT(S) 

ON BEHALF OF CANDIDATES FOR FEDERAL OFFICE 1 PAGE OF 1 

(2 U.S.C. g441a(d)) (TObe used only by Polltlcal Cornmlttees In the General Elelon) FOR LINE 25 OF FORM 3X 

NAME OF COMMITTEE (In Full) Check If 1 0 #hour notice 

Has your committee been designated to make I FUN Name of Subordinate Committee 
 

coordinated expenditures by a political party committee? 
 

YES NO 
 

H YES, name the designating committee: Mailing Address 
 

City State ZIP Code 

Full Name (Last, First, Middle Initial) of Each Payee Purpose or txpendlture 

Aggregate General Election Limit Raised Due to Opponent's Spend- Expendire for this Candidate b ing (2 U.S.C. w41a(i)l441e-1) 

I

Full Name (Last, First, Middle Initial) of Each Payee Purpose of Expediture 

Category1 

Mailing Address Type 

Date 

City State Zip Code a 

a Limit Raised Due to Opponent's Spend 

ing (2 U.S.C. §441a(i)/441a-1) 

I Category1 

Mailing Address Type 

i SUBTOTAL of Expenditures This Page (optional).....................................................................b .-i-*.l,,a*Zn&~t:ea~.~ml**li.&w.-

-4 ..*;au 7.a.w:.a-.i~.&-,*~;bw1.1.?-;"9999i I1 

FEC Schedule F (Form 3X) Rev. 0212003 

46 
Appendix C 

SCHEDULE HI (FEC Form 3X) 

METHOD OF ALLOCATION FOR: 

ALLOCATED FEDERAL AND NONFEDERAL ADMINISTRATIVE, GENERIC VOTER 


DRIVE AND EXEMPT ACTIVITY COSTS 


ALLOCATED FEDERAL AND LEVlN FUNDS FEDERAL ELECTION ACTIVITY 


EXPENSES (State, District and Local Party Committees Only) 


ALLOCATED PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS THAT REFER TO ANY POLITICAL PARTY 


(BUT NOT A CANDIDATE) (Separate Segregated Funds And Nonconnected Committees Only) 


NAME OF COMMllTEE (In Full) 

USE ONLY ONE SEC'TION, A or B 

A. State and Local Party Committees 

Fixed Percentage (select one) 

-Presidential-OnlyElection Year (28% Federal) 

-Presidential and Senate Election Year (36% Federal) 

-Senate-Only Election Year (21% Federal) 

-Non-Presidential and Non-Senate Election Year (15% Federal) 

B. Separate Segregated Funds and Nonconnected Committees 

Flat Minimum Federal Percentage 

If the committee will allocate using the flat minimum percentage of 50% federal funds, check 0 

or 

If the committee is spending more than 50% federal funds, indicate ratio below 

Federal....................................................................... 


Nonfederal................................................................. 


This ratio applies to (check all that apply): 

%%*I 


Administrative a Generic Voter Drive Public Communications Referencing Party Only I. 

FEC Schedule HI (Fonn 3X) Rev.12R004 
Appendix C 

SCHEDULE H2 (FEC Form 3X) 

ALLOCATION RATIOS I 

NAME OF COMMITTEE (In Full) 

RATIOS FOR ALLOCABLE FUNDRAISING EVENTS AND DIRECT CANDIDATE SUPPORT 


ACTIVITIES APPEARING ON THIS REPORT. 


Methods of allocation: 

I. FUNDRAISING activities are allocated using the 'funds received method" where the federal proportion of 


expenses must equal the federal proportion of monies raised. 


II. Shared DIRECT CANDIDATE SUPPORT activities are allocated according to benefit expected to be derived, 

where the federal proportion of disbursements is based on the benefit derived by federal candidates from the activity. For PAC8 Only: Direct candidate support includes public communications or voter drives that refer to both 

federal and nonfederal candidates, regardless of whether there is a reference to a political party. Such expenses 

are allocated using a timetspace method. 

I ACTIVITY OR EVENT IDENTIFIER 

FEDERAL X NONFEDERAL % 

ACTIVITY IS: 

Fundraising 0Direct Candidate Support Oh 

CHECK IF THE RATlO IS: 

[7 New Revised Same as Previously Reported 

I 

ACTIVITY OR EVENT IDENTIFIER 

FEDERAL % NONFEDERAL % 

ACTIVITY IS: nFundraising [:>irect Candidate Support 0'/a YO 

CHECK IF THE RATlO IS: 

Same as Previously Reported 

ACTIVITY OR EVENT IDENTIFIER 

FEDERAL % NONFEDERAL X I 

ACTIVITY IS: 
 a Fundraising Direct Candidate Support 


CHECK IF THE RATlO IS: 


New Revised C] Same as Previously Reported 


ACTIVITY OR EVENT IDENTIFIER 

FEDERAL % NONFEDERAL "b 

ACTIVITY IS: 

C]Fundraising Direct Candidate Support 

CHECK IF THE RATlO IS: 

Same as Previously Reported 

I I 

ACTIVITY OR EVENT IDENTIFIER 

FEDERAL % 1 NONFEDERAL %

ACTIVITY IS: 

Fundraising []I) Direct Candidate Support 

CH,ECK IF THE RATlO IS: 1 0New Revised C] Same as Previously Reported 

ACTlVlN OR EVENT IDENTIFIER 

FEDERAL % 1 NONFEDERAL %

ACTIVITY IS: 


Cl] Fundraising [:.--I A Direct Candidate Support 


CHECK IF THE RATlO IS: 

I--'-/ New p Revisad n Same as Previously Reported 

FEC Schdula HZ (Form 3X) Rev. 12/2004 
Appendix C 

SCHEDULE H3 (FEC Form 3X) 

TRANSFERS FROM NONFEDERAL ACCOUNTS FOR 

ALLOCATED FEDERAL / NONFEDERAL ACTIVITY 

NAME OF COMMllTEE (In Full) 

I DATE OF RECEIPT 

BREAKDOWN OF TRANSFER RECEIVED 

I) Total Admlnlrtratlve ............................................................................................................. 
 

11) Generic Voter Drlve ............................................................................................................. 
 

Ill) Exempt Activltles ................................................................................................................... 
 

I lv) Dlred Fundralslng (List Activity or Event Identifier) 

b) 

c) Total Amount Transferred For Direct Fundraising ............................................................. 

v) Mrsct Candidate Support (List Activity or Event Identifier) 

c) Total Amount Transferred For Direct Candidate Support .................................................. 
 

TOTALS FOR BREAKDOWN OF TRANSFER RECEIVED 
 

TOTAL This Period (Administrative) .......................................................... 
 

TOTAL This Period (Generic Voter Drive) ....................................................... 
 

TOTAL This Period (Exempt Activities) .................................................................. 
 

TOTAL This Period (Direct Fundraising) ....................................................................... 
 

TOTAL This Period (Direct Candidate Support) .................................................................. 
 

TOTAL This Period (Public Communications Referring Only to Party) .................................. 
 

TOTAL This Period (Total Amount Transferred) ....................... ......................................................... 
 

I 

FE5AN015 

PAGE OF 

FOR LINE 18a OF FORM 3X 

TOTAL AMOUNT TRANSFERRED 

I 
 

I 
 

FEC &hdula H3 (Form 3X) Rev. 12/2004 

49 
 

I 
Appendix C 

SCHEDULE H4 (FEC Form 3x1 

DISBURSEMENTS FOR ALLOCATED PAGE OF 

FEDERAUNONFEDERALACTIVITY FOR LINE 21a OF FORM 3X 

NAME OF COMMllTEE (In Full) 

Allocated Activity or Event:

LA Administrative Fundraising Exempt 

Mailing Address rr] Voter Drive 0Direct Candidate Support 

A. Full Name (Last, First, Middle Initial) - - ,--"" 

State Zip Code Public Comm (ref to party only) by PAC 

Allocated Activity or Event Year-To-Date 

Activitv or Event Identifier: 1 

FEDERAL SHARE + NONFEDERAL SHARE -

- TOTAL AMOUNT 

B. Full Name (last. First. Middle Initial) 1 Allocated Activity or Event: 

j-..A Administrative u Fundraising Exempt 

Mailing Address UVoter Drive C]Direct Candidate Support 

State Zip Code 1 Public Comm (ref to patty only) by PAC 

Allocated Activity or Event Year-To-Date 

Activity or Event Identifier: 

FEDERAL SHARE + NONFEDERAL SHARE -

- TOTAL AMOUNT 

C. Full Name (Last, First, Middle Initial) 1 Allocated Activity or Event: 

1 Administrative Fundraising- Exempt 

Mailing Address I nMM Mve Direct Candidate Support 

City State Zip Code i]Public Comm (ref to party only) by PAC 

Allocated Activity or Event Year-To-Date 

SUBTOTAL of Allocated Federal and NonFederal Activity This Page 

FEDERAL SHARE NONFEDERAL SHARE - TOTAL AMOUNT swwg r+ qst 'i~am~~si$wsmhpx q~vqiiaaap~~ em@p".g.. -a qi na hsuAwaim g+vrnq-%~w~v~uma%yw V r 4).,warg 6 r

L &&v~&dv~+had 

7+
 &i&amtii-c 03 L&*-$aA%* daaaa* n&-.d~~~~

i'$p.'$p. *I$ 

TOTAL This Period (last page for each line only)(Fe nFedera1share to 21(a)(ii)) 

FEDERAL SHARE NONFEDERAL SHARE TOTAL AMOUNT 

-qpm"$"'L P'"~~*"wp?m%&v*r"">,%

L 

*.,, C m*&%"x,&b.@*?, 4 


FEC Schedule H4 (Form 3X) Rev. 1212004 

50 
Appendix C 

SCHEDULE H5 (FEC Form 3X) 

TRANSFERS OF LEVlN FUNDS RECEIVED FOR 

ALLOCATED FEDERAL ELECTION ACTIVITY 

(To be used by State, Dlstrlct and Local Party Committees Only) 

NAME OF COMMITTEE (In Full) 

BREAKDOWN OF THlS TRANSFER 
 

VOTER REGISTRATION 
 I) 	 Voter Reglstratlon 

Total Amount Transferred for Voter Registration ..... 

VOTER ID 
 

11) Voter ID 
 

Total Amount Transferred for Voter ID ............................... 
 

GON 

Ill) 	 GOlV 
 

Total Amount Transferred for GOTV ................................................ 
 

GENERIC CAMPAIGN ACTIVITY 

lv) Generic Campaign Actlvlty 

Total Amount Transferred for Generic Campaign Activity .............................. 
 

NAME OF ACCOUNT 	 DATE OF RECEIPT TOTAL AMOUNT TRANSFERRED 

I 

BREAKDOWN OF THlS TRANSFER 
 

VOTER REGISTRATION 
 I) 	 Voter Regldratlon 

Total Amount Transferred for Voter Registration ..... 

VOTER ID 
 

11) Voter ID 
 

Total Amount Transferred for Voter ID ............................... 
 

GOTV Ill) GOTV 
 

Total Amount Transferred for GOTV ................................................ 
 

Iv) Generlc Campalgn Actlvlty 
 

Total Amount Transferred for Generic Campaign Activity .............................. 
 

TOTALS FOR BREAKDOWN OF TRANSFER RECEIVED (Last Page Only) 

TOTAL This Period (Voter Registration) .............................. 
 

TOTAL This Period (Voter ID) ....................................................... 
 

TOTAL This Period (GOTV) ............................................................................. 
 

TOTAL This Period (Generic Campaign Activity) ....................................................... 
 

.p"m%p.4'".p~~ 3 8 *Fbs~*wp"'*!ep1'Wp-W s TOTAL This Period (Total Amount of Transfers Received) .................................................... 
 ,i"i $9 <Wm$%i"iti** **tb3 

-4 
 

FEC Schedule H5 (Fonn 3X) Rev. 0212003 

i 
Appendix C 

SCHEDULE H6 (FEC Form 3X)


DISBURSEMENTS OF FEDERAL AND LEVlN FUNDS 
 

FOR ALLOCATED FEDERAL ELECTION ACTIVITY 
 

(To be used by State, Dlstrlct and Local Party Committees Only) 
 

NAME OF COMMITTEE (In Full) 

A. Full Name (Last, First, Middle Initial) IFull Organization Name of Albcated Activity or Event: 

Voter Registration GOTV 

Voter ID Generic Campaign 

Nailing Address Allocated Activity or Event Year-To-Date I 

purpose of Disbursement 

Tvoe 

FEDERAL SHARE + LEVlN SHARE -

- TOTAL AMOUNT 

B. Full Name (Last, First, Middle Initial) IFull Organization Name Type of Allocated Activity or Event: 

Voter Registration GOTV 

Voter ID Generic Campaig~ 

&lad~ng Address Allocated Activity or Event Year-To-Date 

FEDERAL SHARE + LEVlN SHARE - TOTAL AMOUNT 

C. Full Name (Last, First, Middle Initial) IFull Organization Name Type of Allocated Activity or Event: 

Voter Registration GOTV 

Voter ID 9 
 Generic Campaigr

Mailing Address Allocated Activity or Event Year-To-Date 

t 

SUBTOTAL of Shared Federal and Levin Activity This Page 
 

­
 FEDERAL SHARE + LEVlN SHARE - TOTAL AMOUNT 
 i"..---V "'"p'"*'""w- B

LABB*-~&m~~.Xa~axaxa&~~&~~"~~~ .dm 

TOTAL This Period (last page for each line only)(Federal share to 30(a)(i) and Levin share to 30(a)(il)) 

FEDERAL SHARE TOTAL AMOUNT 

C'"X"",*"" ""'.*"b::"""'".'% IX-"X,,U)w*-. IICIIYI^, 101w-2- mv'r*"'YXBL~~-bili* I , " .r Z i 

FEC Schedule HS (Form 3X) Rev. 0212003 

52 
Appendix C 

SCHEDULE L (FEC Form 3X) 

AGGREGATION PAGE: LEVlN FUNDS 

1. RECEIPTS FROM PERSONS 

(a) Itemized ..................................... 
 (Uw Scheduls L-A) 

(b) Unitemized .................................. 
 

(c) Total ............................................. 
 

2. OTHER RECEIPTS ................................ 
 

3. TOTAL RECEIPTS ................................. 
 

(a) Voter Registration ....................... 
 

(b) Voter ID ....................................... 
 

(c) GOTV .......................................... 
 

8. RECEIPTS.............................................. 
 (horn Line 3) 

9. SUBTOTAL ............................................ 
 (Add Llnrs 7 and 8) 

10. DISBURSEMENTS................................. 
 (From Lh 6) 

11. ENDING CASH ON HAND .............................. 
 (Subbad Line 10 From Line 8) .................................... 
 

FEC Schoduk L (Form 3X) Rev. 0212003 
Appendix C 

SCHEDULE L-A (FEC Form 3X) 

ITEMIZED RECEIPTS OF LEVlN FUNDS 

Full Name (Last, First, Middle Initial) IFull Organization 

Amount of Each Receipt this Period 

city State Zip Code 

Name of tmployer or Pnnclpal Place of Buslness 
 

Aggregate Year-to-Date 
 

Dccupation b 
 

C. 

Mailing Address 
 

Amount of Each Receipt this Period 
 

City State Zip Code -2 

Name of tmployer or Principal Place of Buslness 
 

Aggregate Year-to-Date 
 

Occupation 
 

Amount of Each Receipt this Period 

State Zip Code 7 
 

Name of trnployer or Prlnclpal Place of Buslness 
 

Aggregate Year-to-Date 
 

Dccupat~on w-F*m cm>pwys%**-* u *-* ?x 

.B 

SUBTOTAL of Receipts This Page (optional) ............................................................................ fB&aX*h~~,riiri~:~LLb 

.*""P"~7~*q*~p.NMpPawi' 
 I TOTAL Thls Period (last page this line number only) ............................................................... x,4111*BB


FEC Schedule L-A (Form 3X) Rev. 0212003 
'* 'Wi 

esodtnd lo lueuresrnqs!a 

7
 Ad­

&!CI WIS d!~ epo3 Iunouy 10 ~(383 IueuesAnqs!a s!@ poped 

3WVN 40 33JllWW03 ul) (Unj 

JO JOJ ppJewurm 'sesodmnd JWO ueq lkrpn q ewau pua sse~ppa lo Am le3~lod ee~(wwm 01 W!IOS su~qplua uo~l lpns .aeU(uwoo 

Aw uo~wlwqut pqdm urq rpns slrodotl pus sluouaws AUUI IOU eq PIOS JO pesn Aq Aua uos~ed JOJ eq esadrnd 10 6uwqps SuwnqCpum