---

---

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONWASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

---

FORM 10-Q/A





Amendment No. 1

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2003

|COMPUCREDIT CORPORATION                                                               |  | logo
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----
|a Georgia Corporation
IRS Employer Identification No.58-2336689SEC File Number0-25751
|245 Perimeter Center Parkway, Suite 600
Atlanta, Georgia 30346
(770) 206-6200        

Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

YES
ý        NO o

Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

YES
ý        NO o

The
number of shares outstanding of the issuer's only class of Common Stock, no par value (the "Common Stock") as of April 30, 2003 was 45,936,265 shares.

---

---

---

COMPUCREDIT CORPORATION

FORM 10-Q

TABLE OF CONTENTS

March 31, 2003

|         |  |                       |  |                                                                                       |  |                                                          |  | Page
|-------- |  | --------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----
|PART I.  |  | FINANCIAL INFORMATION |  |                                                                                      
|         |  | Item 1.               |  | Financial Statements (Unaudited)                                                      |  |                                                         
|         |  |                       |  |                                                                                       |  | Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets                    |  | 1   
|         |  |                       |  |                                                                                       |  | Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations          |  | 2   
|         |  |                       |  |                                                                                       |  | Condensed Consolidated Statement of Shareholders' Equity |  | 3   
|         |  |                       |  |                                                                                       |  | Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows          |  | 4   
|         |  |                       |  |                                                                                       |  | Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements     |  | 5   
|         |  | Item 2.               |  | Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |  | 19                                                      
|         |  | Item 3.               |  | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk                            |  | 45                                                      
|         |  | Item 4.               |  | Controls and Procedures                                                               |  | 46                                                      
|PART II. |  | OTHER INFORMATION     |  |                                                                                      
|         |  | Item 1.               |  | Legal Proceedings                                                                     |  | 47                                                      
|         |  | Item 2.               |  | Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds                                             |  | 47                                                      
|         |  | Item 3.               |  | Defaults Upon Senior Securities                                                       |  | 47                                                      
|         |  | Item 4.               |  | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders                                   |  | 47                                                      
|         |  | Item 5.               |  | Other Information                                                                     |  | 47                                                      
|         |  | Item 6.               |  | Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K                                                      |  | 47                                                      
|         |  |                       |  | Signatures                                                                            |  | 48                                                      

---



CompuCredit Corporation and Subsidiaries  Consolidated Balance Sheets

March 31,
2003

December 31,
2002(Restated)
(Unaudited)(Dollars in thousands)AssetsCash and cash equivalents

$
113,870

$
120,416Restricted cash


10,147


10,112Retained interests in credit card receivables securitized


308,498


275,635Accrued interest and fees


15,001


15,804Net credit card receivables


323,499


291,439Amounts due from securitization


15,847


7,235Deferred costs, net


7,047


8,314Software, furniture, fixtures and equipment, net


28,623


29,296Investment in equity method investee


10,315


15,593Investment in debt security


16,921


18,819Prepaid expenses and other assets


17,794


17,691Total assets

$
544,063

$
518,915LiabilitiesAccounts payable and accrued expenses

$
32,329

$
32,570Deferred revenue


9,210


8,979Income tax liability


24,209


29,498Total liabilities


65,748


71,047Shareholders' equityPreferred stock, no par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized:Series A preferred stock, 30,000 and 30,000 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2003 and December 31, 2002, respectively


33,293


32,466Series B preferred stock, 10,000 and 10,000 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2003 and December 31, 2002, respectively


11,311


11,035Common stock, no par value:150,000,000 shares authorized, 46,809,165 and 46,809,165 issued at March 31, 2003 and December 31, 2002, respectively





Additional paid-in capital


241,400


241,400Treasury stock, at cost, 872,900 and 832,900 shares at March 31, 2003 and December 31, 2002, respectively


(4,586
)

(4,338
)Deferred compensation


(908
)

(1,013
)Note issued to purchase stock


(500
)

(500
)Retained earnings


198,305


168,818Total shareholders' equity


478,315


447,868Total liabilities and shareholders' equity

$
544,063

$
518,915


See
accompanying notes.

1

---



CompuCredit Corporation and Subsidiaries  Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited)

For the
three months ended
March 31,2003

2002(Restated)(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)Interest income

$
1,209

$
365Interest expense


(3,298
)

(60
)Net interest (expense) income


(2,089
)

305Other operating income:Income from retained interests in credit card receivables securitized


36,307


5,702Servicing income


27,666


1,285Other credit card fees and other income


28,004


33,280Equity in income of equity method investee


14,296


Total other operating income


106,273


40,267Other operating expense:Salaries and benefits


4,341


3,596Credit card servicing


38,047


20,070Marketing and solicitation


1,587


2,624Depreciation


3,865


3,570Other


8,539


7,462Total other operating expense


56,379


37,322Income before income taxes


47,805


3,250Income taxes


(17,210
)

(1,138
)Net income

$
30,595

$
2,112Net income attributable to common shareholders

$
29,487

$
1,108Net income per common sharebasic

$
0.60

$
0.02Net income per common shareassuming dilution

$
0.60

$
0.02


See
accompanying notes.

2

---



CompuCredit Corporation and Subsidiaries  Consolidated Statement of Shareholders' Equity (Unaudited)  For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2003

|                             |                                       |   |        | Common Stock |            |   |   |   |   |         |   |   |        |      |   |        |    
|---------------------------- | ------------------------------------- | - | ------ | ------------ | ---------- | - | - | - | - | ------- | - | - | ------ | ---- | - | ------ | ---
|
|
|
|
|Balance at December 31, 2002 |                                       | $ | 43,501 |              | 46,809,165 |   |  |   | $ | 241,400 |   | $ | (4,338 | )    | $ | (1,013 | )  
|                             | Preferred dividends                   |   |        |             |            |  |   |  |   |         |  |   |        |     |   |        |   
|                             | Accretion of preferred dividends      |   |        | 1,103        |            |  |   |  |   |         |  |   |        |     |   |        |   
|                             | Purchase of treasury stock            |   |        |             |            |  |   |  |   |         |  |   |        | (248 | ) |        |    
|                             | Amortization of deferred compensation |   |        |             |            |  |   |  |   |         |  |   |        |     |   |        | 105
|                             | Net income                            |   |        |             |            |  |   |  |   |         |  |   |        |     |   |        |   
|                             |                                       |   |        |              |            |   |   |   |   |         |   |   |        |      |   |        |    
|Balance at March 31, 2003    |                                       | $ | 44,604 |              | 46,809,165 |   |  |   | $ | 241,400 |   | $ | (4,586 | )    | $ | (908   | )  
|                             |                                       |   |        |              |            |   |   |   |   |         |   |   |        |      |   |        |    

See accompanying notes.

3

---



CompuCredit Corporation and Subsidiaries  Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)

For the
three months ended
March 31,2003

2002(Restated)(Dollars in thousands)Operating activitiesNet income

$
30,595

$
2,112Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating
activities:Depreciation expense


3,865


3,570Amortization expense


1,661


3,546Amortization of acquired servicing liability


(13,466
)

Amortization of deferred compensation


105


Retained interests income adjustment, net


5,180


2,333Income from equity investee (net of distributions)


5,278


Changes in assets and liabilities:Increase in restricted cash





(10,000
)Decrease in accrued interest and fees


803


2,967(Increase) decrease in amounts due from securitization


(8,612
)

5,947Increase in deferred costs


(2,106
)

(1,007
)(Increase) decrease in prepaid expenses


(313
)

133Decrease in accounts payable and accrued expenses


(1,637
)

(5,875
)Increase (decrease) in deferred revenue


231


(514
)Decrease in income tax liability


(5,289
)

(2,861
)Other


15,072


2,209Net cash provided by operating activities


31,367


2,560Investing activitiesProceeds from bond investment


1,898


Purchase of charged off assets


(14,896
)

Net receivable payments


66,097


57,316Recoveries of receivables previously charged off


4,369


7,757Net distributions to securitization


(93,333
)

(56,594
)Purchases of and development of software, furniture, fixtures and equipment


(1,800
)

(2,069
)Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities


(37,665
)

6,410Financing activitiesPreferred stock issuance costs





(140
)Repurchase of treasury stock


(248
)

Repayment of short-term borrowings





(16,516
)Net cash used in financing activities


(248
)

(16,656
)Net decrease in cash


(6,546
)

(7,686
)Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period


120,416


55,746Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

$
113,870

$
48,060Supplemental cash flow informationCash paid for interest

$
3,298

$
116Cash paid for income taxes

$
22,500

$
4,000Accretion of preferred stock dividends

$
1,103

$
978


See
accompanying notes.

4

---



CompuCredit Corporation and Subsidiaries  Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)  March 31, 2003

1. Organization, Basis of Presentation and Restatement

General

The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of CompuCredit Corporation and its wholly owned subsidiaries (collectively, the "Company").
The Company was formed for the purpose of offering unsecured credit and fee-based products and services to a segment of the consumer credit market. The Company sources the accounts to
which it offers these products and services through direct mail, telemarketing, television, the internet, and acquisition from other credit card issuers. Because only financial institutions can issue
general purpose credit cards, the Company has a contractual arrangement with a third party financial institution pursuant to which the financial institution issues general purpose Visa and MasterCard
credit cards, and the Company purchases the receivables relating to such accounts on a daily basis. Additionally, the Company has purchased the receivables relating to accounts generated by other
third party financial institutions from time to time as a further source for growth in its business. The Company markets to its cardholders other fee-based products including card
registration, memberships in preferred buying clubs, travel services and credit life, disability and unemployment insurance.

The
accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
of America for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC")
Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and notes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete
consolidated financial statements. In the opinion of management, all normal recurring adjustments considered necessary to fairly state the results for the interim periods presented have been included.
The preparation of condensed consolidated financial
statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets
and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, as well as the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.
Actual results could differ from these estimates. Certain estimates, such as credit losses, payments, discount rates and the yield earned on securitized receivables, have a significant impact on the
gains and losses recorded on securitizations and the value of retained interests in credit card receivables securitized. Operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2003 are not
necessarily indicative of the results for the year ending December 31, 2003. These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the notes to the consolidated
financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2002 contained in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC.

Certain
amounts in prior period financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have
been eliminated for financial reporting purposes.

Restatement of Financial Statements

The Company formed in late 2002 a new subsidiary focused on the acquisition and collection of defaulted credit card accounts (and their underlying charged off
receivables). For each acquisition, static pools consisting of homogenous accounts and receivables are established. Once a static pool is established, the receivables within the pool are not changed.
Each static pool is recorded at cost, and is accounted for as a single unit for payment application and income recognition purposes. The Company had originally accounted for its investment in
previously charged off credit card receivables using the

5

---

interest method under the guidance of Practice Bulletin 6, "Amortization of Discounts on Certain Acquired Loans." Income associated with each static pool was accrued monthly based on each static
pool's effective interest rate. This effective interest rate was estimated based on the timing and amount of anticipated cash flows from the pool using the Company's proprietary pricing and collection
models. Following discussions with the Staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") regarding the Company's eligibility to use the interest method under Practice Bulletin 6, it was
determined that the Company does not yet have the requisite experience to use the interest method. Thus, the Company will use the cost recovery method until such time that its experience with this
particular type of investment is sufficient to justify use of the interest method under criteria communicated to the Company by the SEC Staff. The Company does not anticipate meeting these criteria
for use of the interest method for the foreseeable future.

Under the cost recovery method, the Company will recognize income only to the extent that cash flows for each particular static pool of acquired defaulted receivables exceed the
Company's initial investment in each respective static pool. Accordingly, the Company is restating its previously issued financial



statements for the quarter ended March 31, 2003. A summary of the significant changes is as follows (in thousands except per share amounts):

|                         |                                                | As Reported |   | As Restated |  
|------------------------ | ---------------------------------------------- | ----------- | - | ----------- | -
|Balance Sheet:           |                                                |             |   |             |  
|                         | Prepaid expenses and other assets              |             | $ | 23,564      |  
|                         | Total assets                                   |             |   | 549,833     |  
|                         | Income tax liabilities                         |             |   | 26,286      |  
|                         | Total liabilities                              |             |   | 67,825      |  
|                         | Retained earnings                              |             |   | 201,998     |  
|                         | Total shareholders' equity                     |             |   | 482,008     |  
|                         | Total liabilities and shareholders' equity     |             |   | 549,833     |  
|Statement of Operations: |                                                |             |   |             |  
|                         | Other credit card fees and other income        |             | $ | 33,774      |  
|                         | Total other operating income                   |             |   | 112,043     |  
|                         | Income before income taxes                     |             |   | 53,575      |  
|                         | Income taxes                                   |             |   | (19,287     | )
|                         | Net income                                     |             |   | 34,288      |  
|                         | Net income attributable to common shareholders |             |   | 33,180      |  
|                         | Net income per sharebasic                     |             | $ | 0.67        |  
|                         | Net income per sharediluted                   |             | $ | 0.67        |  

2. Significant Accounting Policies

The following is a summary of significant accounting policies followed in the preparation of the condensed consolidated financial statements.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash, money market investments, and overnight deposits. The Company considers all other highly liquid cash investments with
low interest rate risk and maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Cash equivalents are valued at cost, which approximates market.

Restricted Cash

During the first quarter of 2002, the Company entered into an irrevocable standby letter of credit agreement for $10.0 million with a bank, for the purpose
of securing the Company's obligations to the

6

---

financial
institution that issues the credit cards marketed by the Company. The purpose of the letter of credit is to protect the financial institution from non-payment by the Company of
its obligation to purchase receivables arising in the credit card accounts on a daily basis. The Company is required to maintain a minimum cash balance of $10.0 million with the bank that has
issued the letter of credit. Such cash has been disclosed as Restricted cash on the face of the consolidated balance sheet.

Asset Securitization

All of the Company's credit card receivables are securitized. When the Company sells originated receivables in securitizations, it retains certain undivided
ownership interests, interest-only ("I/O") strips and servicing rights. Although the Company continues to service the underlying credit card accounts and maintains the customer
relationships, these securitizations are treated as sales, and the securitized receivables are not reflected on the consolidated balance sheet. The retained ownership interests and the
interest-only strips are included in Retained interests in credit card receivables securitized on the face of the consolidated balance sheet.

Under
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 140, "Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities" ("Statement
No. 140"), gains and losses are recognized at the time of each sale. These gains or losses on sales of receivables depend in part on the previous carrying amount of the financial assets sold as
well as the fair value of the assets and cash proceeds received. The cash flows used in measuring the gains and losses represent estimates of finance charges and late fees, servicing fees, costs of
funds paid to investors, payment rates, credit losses, and required amortization payments to investors. The Company initially records a servicing liability within a securitization structure when the
servicing fees the Company expects to receive do not provide adequate compensation for servicing the receivables. The initial servicing liability is recorded at estimated fair market value. The
servicing liability is then evaluated each quarter and carried at its estimated fair value with changes in fair value included in determining income from retained interests. The change in the fair
value is included as a component of the Company's income from retained interests in credit card receivables securitized with actual expenses being recorded into operations as incurred. Because quoted
market prices are generally not available, the Company estimates fair value based on the estimated present value of future cash flows using management's best estimates of key assumptions as outlined
in Note 5, "Off Balance Sheet Arrangements." The servicing liability is netted against the value of the I/O strip and included in retained interests in credit card receivables securitized on
the Company's balance sheet. In accordance with Statement No. 140, the Company does not consolidate any of the qualified special purpose entities ("QSPEs") in its securitizations.

The
retained interests for portfolios securitized by the Company are accounted for as trading securities and reported at estimated fair market value, with changes in fair value included
in operations in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 115, "Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities" ("Statement No. 115"). The
estimates used to determine the gains and losses and the related fair values of I/O strips and retained ownership interests are influenced by factors outside of the Company's control, and, as a
result, such estimates could materially change from quarter to quarter.

The
retained interests purchased by the Company during 2002 are carried at the lower of amortized cost or fair market value, net of a servicing liability. In accordance with Emerging
Issues Task Force Issue 99-20, "Recognition of Interest Income and Impairment on Purchased and Retained Beneficial Interests in Securitized Financial Assets" ("EITF 99-20"),
expected cash flows in excess of the costs of the purchased retained interests are being amortized into income from retained interests in credit card receivables securitized using the effective
interest method.

7

---

Amounts
due from securitization include payments recently received on the securitized receivables that are still held by the securitization structure but are due and payable to the
Company within the next 30 days.

Accrued Interest and Fees

Accrued interest and fees on the Company's originated portfolios represent the estimated collectable portion of fees earned but not billed to the cardholder at
any period end. Prior to the second quarter of 2002, the Company estimated accrued interest and fees using its estimates of total accrued interest and fees earned but not yet billed. The new estimates
better reflect the Company's expectations of the collectible portion of these interest and fees and are in response to evolving regulatory guidance within the industry.

Retained Interests in Finance Charge Receivables

Included within the Company's retained interests in credit card receivables securitized on its consolidated balance sheet at each period end is the estimated
collectible portion of finance charges and fees billed to cardholders within the originated portfolio but not collected (the Company's "retained interests in finance charge receivables"). Prior to the
second quarter of 2002, the Company estimated its retained interests in finance charge receivables using its estimates of total finance charges and fees billed but not collected. The new estimates
better reflect the Company's expectations of the collectible portion of these finance charges and fees and are in response to evolving regulatory guidance within the industry.

Other Assets

Other assets include receivables from various vendor relationships, as well as the Company's investments in acquired defaulted accounts beginning in 2003. Through
a new subsidiary focused on the





collection of defaulted accounts, the Company accounts for its investment in acquired defaulted accounts using the cost recovery method under the guidance of Practice Bulletin 6, "Amortization
of Discounts on Certain Acquired Loans." Income is recognized to the extent that cash collections have exceeded the investment on a portfolio-by-portfolio basis. See Note 8, "Restatement of
Financial Statements," for further discussion.

For the three months ended March 31, 2003, the following table shows a roll-forward of the Company's new investment in defaulted accounts activities:

Three Months Ended
March 31, 2003(in thousands)Balance at beginning of period

$
Acquisitions of defaulted accounts


14,896Cash collections


(17,270
)Income recognized on defaulted accounts


3,638Balance at end of period

$
1,264Estimated remaining collections ("ERC")

$
34,029


At the time of acquisition, the life of each pool generally is estimated to be between 24 and 60 months based upon the proprietary models of the Company. We anticipate collecting
approximately 70% of the ERC over the next twelve months. The Company included within other assets on its consolidated balance sheet the $1.3 million carrying value of its investment in the
defaulted accounts.

8

---

Treasury Stock

During the third quarter of 2002, the Company's Board of Directors authorized a program to repurchase up to 5 million shares (approximately
11 percent) of its outstanding common stock. Under the repurchase plan, the Company may buy back shares of its common stock from time to time either on the open market or through privately
negotiated transactions in compliance with SEC guidelines. These shares are carried at cost in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. During the first quarter of 2003, the Company repurchased
40,000 shares on the open market for $247,800.

Stock Options

The Company has two stock-based employee compensation plans. As permitted by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, "Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation" ("Statement No. 123"), the Company accounts for those plans under the recognition and measurement principles of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25,
"Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees" ("APB 25"), and its related interpretations. Because all options granted under the Company's plans had an exercise price equal to the market value of the
underlying common stock on the date of grant, no stock-based compensation cost is reflected in net income under the Company's application of APB 25. Additionally, the Company did not issue any options
to non-employees who were not directors for the three months ended March 31, 2003 and March 31, 2002, respectively.

The
following table presents the effects on net income and net income per share if the Company had recognized compensation expense under the fair value recognition provisions of
Statement No. 123:

For the three months ended
March 31,2003

2002(In thousands)Net income, as reported

$
29,487

$
1,108Stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value basis, net of tax


(219
)

(208
)Pro forma net income

$
29,268

$
900Earnings per share:Basicas reported

$
0.60

$
0.02Basicpro forma

$
0.60

$
0.02Dilutedas reported

$
0.60

$
0.02Dilutedpro forma

$
0.60

$
0.02


The
pro forma results may not be indicative of the future effect on the results of operations due to a variety of factors including timing and number of awards. The following table
summarizes the Black-Scholes value of the Company's outstanding stock options on a per share basis, as well as the key assumptions used in the Black-Scholes model.

At March 31,2003

2002Fair value per share

$
3.86

$
6.15Dividend rate


0
%

0
%Risk free rate


2.8
%

4.2
%Expected volatility


77.5
%

85.0
%Expected life of the options


5 years


5 years


9

---

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In November 2002, the FASB issued FASB interpretation No. 45, "Guarantor's Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect
Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others" ("Interpretation No. 45"), which addresses the accounting for and disclosures of guarantees. Interpretation No. 45 requires a guarantor to recognize
a liability for the fair value of a guarantee at inception. The recognition of the liability is required even if it is not probable that payments will be required under the guarantee. The disclosure
requirements are effective for interim and annual financial statements ending after December 15, 2002. (See Note 7, "Commitments and Contingencies.") In accordance with Interpretation
No. 45, the Company applied the initial recognition and measurement provisions on a prospective basis for all guarantees within the scope of Interpretation No. 45 issued or modified
after December 31, 2002. This statement did not have a material impact the financial statements.

In
January 2003, the FASB issued FASB interpretation No. 46, "Consolidated Financial Statements" ("Interpretation No. 46"), which addresses consolidation by business
enterprises of variable interest entities that have certain characteristics. In general, Interpretation No. 46 requires a variable interest entity to be consolidated by a company if that
company is subject to a majority of the risk of loss from the variable interest entity's activities or is entitled to receive a majority of the entity's residual returns or both. An entity that meets
this definition is considered the "primary beneficiary." Interpretation No. 46 requires disclosures about variable interest entities by the primary beneficiary and an enterprise that holds
significant variable interests in a variable interest entity but is not the primary beneficiary. Interpretation No. 46 provides for exceptions to the scope of this interpretation including
transfers to qualifying special purpose entities subject to the reporting of Statement No. 140, which would not be consolidated. Interpretation No. 46 applies immediately to variable
interest entities created after January 31, 2003 and to variable interest entities in which an enterprise obtains an interest after January 31, 2003. Interpretation No. 46 applies
in the first fiscal year, or interim period, beginning after June 15, 2003 to variable interests entities in which an enterprise holds a variable interest that it acquired before
February 1, 2003. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this interpretation on its financial statements, but does not expect it to be material.

3. Equity Method Investment in CSG, LLC

CSG, LLC ("CSG") was formed during the second quarter of 2002 by affiliates of Goldman, Sachs & Co., Salomon Smith Barney and a wholly owned subsidiary of
the Company to acquire notes and a certificated interest issued by a trust ("CSG Trust") that owns a portfolio of credit card receivables, which were initially purchased by the trust from Providian
National Bank. The Company accounts for its interest in CSG using the equity method of accounting. The Company has a 50% interest in CSG and funded its initial $34.9 million investment in CSG
with cash of $3.5 million and by borrowing $31.4 million, which was repaid during the fourth quarter of 2002. During the three months ended March 31, 2003, the Company has
received $19.6 million in cash distributions from CSG.

10

---

The
following represents condensed results of operations of CSG as of and for the three months ended March 31, 2003:

As of
March 31, 2003(in thousands)Retained interests in credit card receivables securitized

$
12,073Total assets


22,256Total liabilities


1,626Members' capital


20,630


For the three months ended
March 31, 2003(in thousands)Income from retained interests in credit card receivables securitized

$
29,854Total other operating income


30,296Net income


28,592


In
exchange for servicing 100% of the receivables owned by the CSG Trust, the Company receives a servicing fee from the securitization structure, which the Company considers adequate
compensation for servicing.

4. Purchase of Assets

In July 2002, the Company closed a transaction with Federated Department Stores, Inc. (NYSE: FD) in which the Company purchased the retained
interests in a trust (the "Fingerhut Trust") that owned approximately $1.0 billion in face amount of receivables for $75.2 million plus the assumption of the servicing liability
associated with the Fingerhut Trust of $95.8 million. The receivables included in the trust were generated by private label revolving credit cards used to purchase items from the Fingerhut
catalog. This portfolio will decrease in size over time because payments from cardholders are expected to be significantly greater than purchases being made by cardholders. In accordance with EITF
99-20, the Company accounts for the retained interests it purchased at the lower of amortized cost or fair market value. Accordingly, the expected cash flows in excess of the costs of the
purchased retained interests ($273.3 million) are being amortized into income from retained interest using the effective interest method over 54 months from the date of acquisition. Also
pursuant to EITF 99-20, the Company updates its model when there has been a change in its estimate of the projected cash flows. This change can result in the Company either
(1) adjusting the prospective yield it will realize over future periods or, (2) if a significant adverse change occurs, reducing the carrying value of our investment to fair value. Based
principally on improved collections experienced during the first quarter of 2003 relative to initial estimates, the Company increased its estimate of the cash flows in excess of the costs of the
purchased retained interests by $9.8 million from its estimates as of December 31, 2002; this change was accounted for prospectively.

The gross excess cash from the securitization structure associated with the Fingerhut Trust retained interests was $86.3 million during the three months ended March 31,
2003. As noted above, the portion of the expected cash flows that exceeds the cost of the purchased retained interests are being amortized into income from retained interest using the effective
interest method ($65.4 million pre-tax was amortized into income during the three months ended March 31, 2003). These cash flow estimates are made using the Company's best
estimates of the expected performance of the portfolio, including the timing of payments derived from such performance. In its estimates of future cash flows, both at the time of purchase (for
purposes of determining its purchase price of the retained interests) and at the conclusion of each financial reporting period pursuant to the requirements of EITF 99-20, the

11

---

Company consistently has modeled the effects of an anticipated early amortization event that was triggered during the first quarter of 2003. The trigger for this early amortization was a minimum
principal balance requirement for the outstanding series in the Fingerhut Trust, which the Company knew it would hit at the date of acquisition because of the anticipated rapid rate of liquidation of
the receivables underlying the securitization facility. The improved collection efforts on this portfolio allowed this trigger to be extended beyond our initial anticipation of the timing of such an
event, allowing us to collect approximately $51 million more in cash from the Fingerhut Trust during the first quarter of 2003 than we anticipated collecting at December 31, 2002. The
net result of the early amortization trigger for the Fingerhut Trust is that a substantial portion of the income from retained interests associated with the Fingerhut Trust has already been recognized
and the Company anticipates significantly reduced income under EITF 99-20 associated with the Fingerhut Trust throughout the remainder of 2003 and the first half of 2004. However, this
trigger does not affect the amortization period of the servicing liability because as the Company will be responsible for servicing the Fingerhut Trust throughout this early amortization period even
though the Company will be realizing significantly diminished cash flows throughout that period and until the investors in the securitization structure are repaid. As of the close of each financial
reporting period, the Company evaluates the appropriateness of its estimates of future cash flows used in the EITF 99-20 computation based on actual results to date and projected future results. As of
March 31, 2003, the gross retained interests in the Fingerhut Trust were carried at $0.2 million.

5. Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

The Company securitizes all of its credit card receivables originated on a daily basis under its primary third party financial institution relationship (the
"originated portfolio") through Master Trusts. Credit card receivables are transferred to the Master Trusts, which issue notes representing undivided ownership interests in the assets of the Master
Trusts. The Company also securitizes two purchased credit card receivables portfolios, which were acquired in 1998, through a securitization structure with a third party commercial paper conduit
administered by a national banking institution. Additionally, during the third quarter of 2002, the Company acquired retained interests in a credit card receivables trust. (See Note 4,
"Purchase of Assets.")

In
accordance with the above, all of the Company's credit card receivables (whether from the originated portfolio or the purchased portfolio) are held by securitization trusts or
multi-seller
commercial paper conduits administered by national banking institutions, and the exclusive interest of the Company in these receivables is in the form of retained interests. Generally accepted
accounting principles require the Company to treat the transfers as sales, and the receivables are removed from the Company's consolidated balance sheet. Under Statement No. 140, an entity
recognizes the assets it controls and liabilities it has incurred, and derecognizes the financial assets for which control has been surrendered and all liabilities that have been extinguished. An
entity is considered to have surrendered control over the transferred assets and, therefore, to have sold the assets if the following conditions are met:



12

---



The securitization transactions do not affect the relationship the Company has with its customers, and the Company continues to service the credit card receivables.

The
table below summarizes all of the Company's securitization activity:

For the three months ended March 31,2003

2002(In thousands)Gross amount of receivables securitized at period end (total managed receivables)

$
2,068,573

$
1,809,070Proceeds from collections reinvested in revolving period securitizations


251,738


306,420Excess cash flows received on retained interests


134,826


52,368Income from retained interests in credit card receivables securitized


36,307


5,702


The
investors in the Company's securitization transactions have no recourse against the Company for its customers' failure to pay their credit card receivables. However, most of the
Company's retained interests are subordinated to the investors' interests until the investors have been fully paid.

All
collections received from the cardholders underlying each securitization are included in the securitization cash flows. This includes collections from the cardholders for interest,
fees and other charges on the accounts and collections from the cardholders repaying the principal portion of their account balances. The cash flows are then distributed to the Company as servicer for
its servicing fee, to the investors as interest on their outstanding notes, to the investors to repay any portion of their outstanding notes that become due and payable, and to the Company as the
seller to fund new purchases. The cash flows distributed to investors to repay the portion of their outstanding notes that became due and payable in the three months ended March 31, 2003 and
March 31, 2002 totaled $134.8 million and $52.4 million, respectively. Any collections from cardholders remaining each month after making the payments noted above are paid to the
Company on its retained interests.

The
measurements of the Company's retained interests are dependent upon management's estimates of future cash flows using the cash-out method. Under the cash-out
method, the future cash flows (including the release of any cash related to credit enhancements) are recorded at a discounted value. The cash flows are discounted based on the timing of when the
Company expects to receive the cash flows. The discount rates are based on management's estimates of returns that would be required by investors in an investment with similar terms and credit quality.
Interest rates received on the credit card receivables are estimated based on the stated annual percentage rates in the credit card agreements. Estimated default and payment rates are based on
historical results, adjusted for expected changes based on the Company's credit risk models. Credit card receivables are typically charged off when the receivable becomes 180 days past due,
although earlier charge offs may occur specifically related to accounts of bankrupt or deceased customers. Bankrupt and deceased customers' accounts are typically charged off within 30 days of
verification.

The
retained interests associated with those credit card receivables that the Company has securitized are carried at estimated fair market value, and because they are classified as
trading securities, any changes in fair value are included in income. Because quoted market prices for the Company's retained interests in its originated portfolio are generally not available, the
Company estimates fair value based on the estimated present value of future cash flows using management's best estimates of key assumptions.

13

---

The
Company's retained interests in credit card receivables securitized include the following:

March 31,
2003

December 31,
2002(In thousands)I/O strip

$
87,780

$
99,964Servicing liability


(90,727
)

(108,010
)Fair value of Seller's Interest


311,445


283,681Retained interests in credit card receivables securitized

$
308,498

$
275,635


The
I/O strip reflects the fair value of the Company's rights to future income from the Company's originated portfolio and includes certain credit enhancements. The servicing liability
reflects, for those securitizations for which servicing compensation is not adequate, the fair value of the costs to service the receivables above and beyond the servicing income the Company expects
to receive from the securitizations. The change in the servicing liability associated with the Fingerhut Trust acquired in July 2002 (a reduction of $13.5 million in the three months
ended March 31, 2003) is included as a component of servicing income. The fair value of seller's interest includes those interests the Company retains in securitizations of its originated
portfolio receivables, as well as the Company's purchased interests in securitizations.

Changes
in any of the assumptions used to value the Company's retained interests could impact the fair value estimates. The weighted average key assumptions used to estimate the fair
value of the Company's retained interests in receivables the Company has securitized are presented below:

March 31,
2003

December 31,
2002

March 31,
2002Payment rate (monthly)

6.8
%
6.7
%
7.1
%Expected credit loss rate (annualized)

18.4

18.0

16.7Residual cashflows discount rate

22.5

22.5

34.9Servicing liability discount rate

14.1

14.1

14.1


During
the fourth quarter of 2001, the Company sold approximately $36.3 million of its retained interests in credit card receivables securitized for net proceeds of approximately
$26.7 million in two transactions. As a result of these transactions, the Company increased its residual cash flow discount rate to 34.9% in 2001. During the second quarter of 2002, the Company
hired an independent financial advisory firm to assist in the Company's evaluation of its estimate of the residual cash flow discount rate. The independent financial advisory firm advised that the
appropriate residual cash flow discount rate was 22.5%. The Company adopted that recommendation and in the second quarter of 2002 revised the estimate for the residual cash flow discount rate to
22.5%.

14

---

At
March 31, 2003, the following illustrates the hypothetical effect an adverse 5 and 10 percent change in key economic assumptions has on the retained interests in credit
card receivables securitized ($ in thousands):

Credit Card
ReceivablesPayment rate (monthly)


6.8
%Impact on fair value of 5% adverse change

$
(1,183
)Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change

$
(2,898
)Expected credit loss rate (annualized)


18.4
%Impact on fair value of 5% adverse change

$
(7,891
)Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change

$
(15,780
)Residual cash flows discount rate


22.5
%Impact on fair value of 5% adverse change

$
(2,891
)Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change

$
(5,737
)Servicing discount rate


14.1
%Impact on fair value of 5% adverse change

$
(244
)Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change

$
(209
)


These
sensitivities are hypothetical and should be used with caution. As the figures indicate, changes in fair value based on a 5% and a 10% variation in assumptions generally cannot be
extrapolated because the relationship of the change in assumption to the change in fair value may not be linear. Also, in this table, the effect of a variation in a particular assumption on the fair
value of the retained interest is calculated without changing any other assumptions; in reality, changes in one assumption may result in changes in another. For example, increases in market interest
rates may result in lower prepayments and increased credit losses, which could magnify or counteract the sensitivities.

The
retained interests purchased by the Company during 2002 are carried at the lower of amortized cost or fair market value, net of a servicing liability. In accordance with EITF
99-20, expected cash flows in excess of the cost of the purchased retained interests are being amortized into income from retained interests using the effective interest method.

The
Company's managed receivables portfolio underlying its securitizations (including its 50% ownership in the CSG receivables) is comprised of retained interests in the credit card
receivables securitized and the investors' shares of these securitized receivables. The investors' shares of securitized credit card receivables are not assets of the Company. The following table
summarizes the balances included in the Company's managed receivables portfolio underlying its securitizations.

March 31,
2003

December 31,
2002(In thousands)Total managed principal balance

$
2,206,575

$
2,492,890Total managed finance charge balance


263,466


302,998Total managed receivables

$
2,470,041

$
2,795,888Receivables delinquent60 or more days

$
328,138

$
388,651Net charge offs for the three months ended

$
133,666

$
123,877


15

---

6. Earnings Per Share

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share:

For the three months ended
March 31,2003

2002(In thousands, except per share data)Numerator:Net income

$
30,595

$
2,112Preferred stock dividends


(1,108
)

(1,004
)Income attributable to common shareholders

$
29,487

$
1,108Denominator:Denominator for basic earnings per shareweighted-average shares outstanding


50,827


46,559Effect of dilutive stock options


144


7Denominator for diluted earnings per shareadjusted weighted-average shares


50,971


46,566Basic earnings per share

$
0.60

$
0.02Diluted earnings per share

$
0.60

$
0.02


The
Company's preferred shares, plus dividends that have been accreted, are convertible into approximately 4.95 million shares of common stock at $9.14 per share as of
March 31, 2003 and are included in the weighted average shares outstanding as of March 31, 2003. These shares were not included in the computation of diluted EPS for the three months
ended March 31, 2002 because including these shares would have been anti-dilutive.

7. Commitments and Contingencies

In the normal course of business through the origination of unsecured credit card receivables, the Company incurs off balance sheet risks. These financial
instruments consist of commitments to extend credit totaling approximately $3.8 billion and $3.7 billion at March 31, 2003 and December 31, 2002, respectively. These
instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit risk in excess of the amounts securitized. The principal amount of these instruments reflects the maximum exposure the Company has in the
instruments. The Company has not experienced and does not anticipate that all of its customers will exercise their entire available line of credit at any given point in time. The Company has the right
to reduce or cancel these available lines of credit at any time.

The
Company is an equity member of CSG. During the second quarter of 2002, CSG entered into a note purchase agreement whereby it agreed to buy additional interests in a portfolio of
credit card receivables owned by CSG Trust should there be net new growth in the receivables or should collections not be available to fund new cardholder purchases. As of March 31, 2003, CSG
would be obligated to purchase up to approximately $97.3 million of new notes from the CSG Trust should this contingency arise. In general, this contingency amount will decline as the amount of
credit available to cardholders for future purchases declines. The portfolio has and is expected to continue to decline during the life of the CSG Trust as payments are expected to exceed new
purchases each month. As a member of CSG, the Company has agreed to guarantee the payment of the purchase price of the aforementioned new notes if the events giving rise to this contingency arise, but
only if CSG itself should fail to purchase the new notes under the note purchase agreement. As of March 31, 2003, CSG had not and was not required to purchase any additional notes under the
note purchase agreement.

16

---

The
Company's guarantee is limited to its ownership percentage in CSG (which at March 31, 2003 was 50%) times the total amount of the notes that CSG would be required to purchase. Therefore, as
of March 31, 2003, the maximum amount of the Company's guarantee was approximately $48.7 million. The Company currently does not have any liability recorded with respect to this
guarantee, but will record one if events occur that make payment probable under the guarantee; the fair value of this guarantee is not material.

The Company's agreement with its principal third-party originating financial institution requires the Company to purchase on a daily basis the credit card receivables that are originated
in the accounts maintained for the Company's benefit. To secure this obligation, the Company provides the financial institution a $10.0 million cash collateralized letter of credit and has
pledged retained interests carried at approximately $66.2 million. These arrangements prevent the Company from using the $10.0 million of cash for any other purpose, although the Company
can substitute other collateral for the pledged retained interests. The Company's arrangements with the financial institution were extended during the third quarter of 2002 and now expire in
March 2006. If the Company were to terminate its service agreement with this institution, there would be penalties of approximately $3.9 million as of March 31, 2003. The Company
currently does not have any liability recorded with respect to the guarantees discussed in this paragraph, but will record one if events occur that make payment probable under the guarantees; the fair
value of these guarantees is not material.

The
Company's most significant source of liquidity is the securitization of credit card receivables. The maturity terms of the Company securitizations vary. The Company has two,
three-year securitizations that it completed in August 2000 and July 2001, several one-year securitizations, and, through the Fingerhut Trust, an amortizing term
securitization. Once repayment begins within any particular securitization facility, payments from customers on credit card receivables are accumulated to repay the investors and are no longer
reinvested in new credit card receivables. At such time, the Company's funding requirements for new credit card receivables will increase accordingly. The occurrence of adverse events may also cause
the securitization transactions to amortize earlier than scheduled or may require additional enhancements. These events include a decline in the portfolio's annualized net yield or a decline in the
payment rate, in each case, below set rates, or an increase in delinquencies or charge offs, in each case, above set rates. The portfolio's annualized net yield typically includes monthly finance
charges and past due fees collected on the receivables less monthly servicing fees, credit losses and cost of funds. The aforementioned events would accelerate the need to utilize alternative funding
sources. If the Company's securitization facilities begin to trap cash flows or otherwise increase their required credit enhancement and the Company is unable to obtain additional sources of liquidity
(such as other securitization facilities structurally subordinate to those facilities that are trapping cash or are in their amortization period, other debt or additional equity), the Company would
begin to close the credit card accounts that are open to new purchases and thus significantly reduce the Company's need for any additional cash.

Under
each of the securitization structures arranged by the Company, there has not been an early amortization period. However, the Fingerhut Trust Series 1998-2
issuance (in which the Company acquired retained interests during the third quarter of 2002) began an early amortization during March 2003. In line with the Company's expectations at the time
of the Company's acquisition and projections upon which the Company based its purchase price for the Fingerhut Trust retained interests, the Fingerhut Trust Series 1998-2 issuance
triggered an early amortization as a result of the principal balance of receivables in the trust falling below the minimum balance required by the series. The Company also anticipates that, due to an
expected reduction in the principal balance of the receivables within the CSG Trust (the retained interests in which are owned by the Company's equity method investee, CSG), a principal balance
trigger will occur, and hence early amortization will begin, during the second quarter of 2003. The occurrence of this event will cause CSG to cease its cash distributions to the Company. The Company
expects, however, to continue to receive throughout the

17

---

early
amortization period adequate compensation for servicing the receivables underlying the CSG Trust. The Company also expects that the CSG Trust will continue to make payments to the Company in
respect of interest on notes held by the Company.

Finally,
while the Company has never triggered an early amortization within any of the series underlying its originated portfolio securitizations and while the Company does not believe
that it will, it is conceivable that, even with close management, the Company may trigger an early amortization of one or more of the outstanding series within its Master Trust as it focuses further
on reducing the managed receivables balances within its originated portfolio within its Master Trust.

As each securitization facility expires or comes up for renewal, there can be no assurance that the facility will be renewed or if renewed there can be no assurance that the terms will
be as favorable as the terms that currently exist. Either of these events could significantly increase the Company's need for additional liquidity.

18

---

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our condensed consolidated financial statements and the related notes included
therein.

This
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations includes forward-looking statements. We have based these forward-looking statements on our
current plans, expectations and beliefs about future events. In light of the risks, uncertainties and assumptions discussed under the caption "Risk Factors" in "Item 1. Business" of our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") and other factors discussed in that section, there is a
risk that our actual experience will differ materially from the expectations and beliefs reflected in the forward-looking statements in this section.

General

CompuCredit is a credit card company that originates and purchases receivables and markets products and services to its customers for which it earns commissions
from the providers of such products and services, and to a limited extent certain fee payments directly from its customers. We market unsecured Visa and MasterCard credit cards through direct mail and
telemarketing and, to a limited degree, television and the internet.

Our
revenues primarily consist of (1) securitization income, (2) income from our retained interests in credit card receivables securitized, (3) servicing income,
(4) other credit card fees and other income, (5) interchange fees, (6) ancillary product revenue and (7) equity in the income of our equity method investee.

Securitization
income is gain or loss we recognize at the time of each sale of our credit card receivables. Income or loss from retained interests in credit card receivables securitized
is the income or loss we recognize from credit card receivables that have been securitized. See the "Off Balance Sheet Arrangements" and "Results of Operations" sections for additional information.
Servicing income consists of the gross fees we receive for servicing the various portfolios of securitized credit
card receivables. Other credit card fees and other income includes annual fees, over-limit fees, cash advance fees, other fees assessed to our cardholders and recovery revenue. Interchange
fees are the portions of the merchant fees assessed by Visa and MasterCard that are passed on to us and are a function of the purchase volume of our cardholders. Ancillary product revenue consists of
the commissions we earn from our sales on behalf of various providers of products and services of certain fee-based products and to a limited extent certain fees that we receive directly
from customers associated with the sale of various fee-based products. These fee-based products include various memberships, insurance, subscription and other products. Equity
in the income of our equity method investee is our portion of our equity method investment in CSG discussed below.

Our
primary operating costs include funding costs, credit losses and other operating expenses, such as employee compensation, account solicitation and marketing expenses, data
processing, servicing expenses and income taxes.

We
originate the receivables in our originated portfolio through the use of our target marketing system and direct mail, telemarketing, and to a limited extent, internet and television
campaigns. We also add accounts by purchasingeither by ourselves or with entities formed through our partnership with othersboth credit card receivables portfolios and
retained interests in credit card receivables portfolios that have been previously securitized by others. With the exception of receivables purchased or originated through accounts added in portfolio
acquisitions, the size of our receivables depend in part on the timing, size and success of our marketing campaigns. During periods of reduced marketing, which we experienced in 2002 and so far in
2003 and expect to continue to experience throughout 2003

19

---

and
until we see more favorable advance rates for our securitizations in the asset backed securities markets, our originated receivables portfolio may not grow and may decline. As a result, our
originated receivables portfolio declined in the first quarter of 2003 and is expected to continue its decline throughout 2003. We continue to evaluate opportunities to purchase portfolios because we
believe they may provide an attractive return on our investment and because we believe that we may be able to obtain liquidity to fund these activities under favorable terms.

During
the second quarter of 2002, we purchased a 50% interest in CSG, LLC ("CSG"). CSG was formed during the second quarter of 2002 by affiliates of Goldman, Sachs & Co. and
Salomon Smith Barney and one of our wholly owned subsidiaries. CSG was formed to acquire notes and a certificated interest issued by a trust ("CSG Trust") that had acquired credit card receivables
from Providian National Bank. Equity in the income of our equity method investee is 50% of CSG's income or loss, before income taxes. See the "Results of Operations" and "Equity Method Investment in
CSG" sections for additional information on these revenues. For a fee that represents adequate compensation for servicing, we have agreed to service the entire portfolio of credit card receivables
underlying the CSG Trust.

In
July 2002, we acquired from Federated Department Stores, Inc. ("Federated") the retained interests in a trust (the "Fingerhut Trust") that then owned approximately
$1.0 billion in face amount of receivables. The receivables included in the Fingerhut Trust are associated with private label revolving credit cards which were used to purchase items from the
Fingerhut catalog. This portfolio has decreased and will continue to decrease in size over time because payments from cardholders are expected to be significantly greater than purchases being made by
the cardholders. We also hired approximately 830 employees from Federated to service the receivables in the Fingerhut Trust. We assumed a servicing liability in the Federated transaction because the
contractual servicing fee we receive from the Fingerhut Trust is less than adequate compensation for servicing the receivables. Our servicing liabilities, as well as why we accept servicing revenues
less than our anticipated servicing costs, are more fully described in our "Off Balance Sheet Arrangements" section below.

In January 2003, we formed a company, Jefferson Capital Systems, LLC, to take advantage of what we deemed to be an opportunity within the defaulted receivables recovery area.
Based on our belief that many charged off credit card receivables currently are undervalued and given the excess servicing capacity we have as a result of declines in the receivables that we manage
within the originated and purchased portfolios, we believe that it is advantageous to develop limited recovery operations that may allow us to achieve returns on equity within this area greater than
those that we currently can derive within our credit card receivables origination business. Pursuant to a competitive bid process in the open market, Jefferson Capital purchases defaulted receivables
from third parties. Through Jefferson Capital, we acquired defaulted accounts with an aggregate face value amount of $1.7 billion at a cost of $14.9 million during the three months ended
March 31, 2003, and these activities generated a pre-tax loss of $1.3 million during this same period. See Note 2 (Significant Accounting Policies) to our unaudited condensed
consolidated financial statements for further discussion of the accounting for these purchases.

Our
income is largely dependent upon the size and the quality of the credit card receivables underlying our securitizations. Our principal growth in 2002 was associated with the
acquisition of the retained interests from Federated and our investment in CSG. The receivables within the Fingerhut Trust, in particular, are expected to decline very rapidly. If we do not increase
the growth of our portfolio either by originating more accounts or by acquiring additional portfolios, our income from retained interests in future quarters will likely decrease relative to that
experienced in 2002 and during the first quarter of 2003.

Depending
on relative competitive, market and liquidity environments for portfolio acquisition versus origination, we may use either or both of these methods of account growth to varying
degrees.

20

---

We
believe that the current competitive, market and liquidity environments favor growth through acquisition, rather than origination, for our entire underserved customer base, except for those
consumers at the lower end of the FICO scoring system. As such, we plan to grow during the remainder of 2003 through acquisition, rather than origination, for all of those segments of our underserved
market except for a segment of consumers at the lower end of the FICO scoring system to which we plan to offer a largely fee-based card product during the remainder of 2003.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

We refer the reader to Items I and VII of our 2002 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC for a detailed discussion of our
securitization facilities and the mechanics of operation.

Various
references within this report are to the managed credit card receivables underlying our off-balance sheet securitization facilities. Performance metrics and data
based on these managed receivables are key to any evaluation of the Company's performance in managing (including underwriting, valuing purchased receivables, servicing and collecting) the portfolios
of receivables underlying our off-balance sheet securitization facilities. Indeed, we allocate resources within our Company and manage our Company using financial data and results prepared
on a so-called "managed basis." It is also important to analysts, investors and others that we provide selected metrics and data on a managed basis because it is through our reporting on
this basis that they are able to compare our Company to others within the specialty finance industry. Moreover, our Company's management, analysts, investors and others believe it is critical that
they understand the credit performance of our entire portfolio of managed credit card receivables because it reveals information concerning the quality of loan originations and the related credit
risks inherent within the securitized portfolios and our retained interests in the respective securitization facilities.

Managed
receivables data assumes that we have not sold the credit card receivables underlying our off-balance sheet securitization facilities and presents the net credit
losses and delinquent balances on the receivables as if we had still owned the receivables. Reconciliation of the managed receivables data to our GAAP financial statements requires recognition that
all of our credit card receivables have been sold in securitization transactions; this reconciliation requires the removal of all of the managed receivables data from our books and records to yield
zero credit card receivables and associated statistics under GAAP, coupled with the recording under GAAP of retained interests in various securitization structures as explained herein.

The
table below summarizes our securitization activity for the periods presented and does not include any of the receivables managed by or the securitization facility of CSG, our
50%-owned equity method investee:

As of or for the three months ended
March 31,2003

2002(In thousands)Gross amount of receivables securitized at period end (1)

$
2,068,573

$
1,809,070Proceeds from collections reinvested in revolving-period securitizations


251,738


306,420Excess cash flows received on retained interests


134,826


52,368Income from retained interests in credit card receivables securitized


36,307


5,702


---

21

---

The
gross amount of receivables securitized increased from March 31, 2002 to March 31, 2003 due to the addition of the managed receivables underlying the Fingerhut Trust,
partially offset, however, by a decline in the managed receivables associated with our originated portfolio. Proceeds from collections reinvested in revolving-period securitizations decreased during
that same time period due to reduced growth in our originated portfolio, coupled with the fact that there are a low level of purchases within the Fingerhut Trust managed receivables. Also during this
time period, excess cash flows received on retained interests as well as income from retained interests in credit card receivables securitized increased due to the strong and improving performance of
the managed receivables underlying our retained interests in the Fingerhut Trust. We have implemented a number of new management and collection initiatives.

The
trusts or the conduits in our securitization structures purchase receivables from us by raising proceeds from investors. The proceeds raised are included within the series of notes
issued by the trusts or issued by the conduits. The proceeds from the investors are then remitted to us as part of the trusts' or conduits' purchase price of the receivables. See the "Securitization
Facilities" section below for more detail. We try to structure our securitization funding sources by having commitments in excess of our current growth plans so that we have investors who will
purchase notes from the trusts, which in turn allows the trusts to purchase receivables from us. We believe we have structured our securitization program to reduce our reliance on any one series of
notes by staggering the maturity dates of the notes (assuming, of course, that prior to the maturity of any one series of notes that such series can be replaced with a series structurally subordinate
to the series that is nearing maturity).

The
payment terms of each securitization structure are negotiated with investors. Some facilities enter into accumulation periods at pre-determined dates prior to their
maturity. During an accumulation period, a portion of cash collected from the cardholders is required to be accumulated in an account for the benefit of the facility and is not available to us to fund
new purchases.

In
our securitization structure associated with the portfolios we purchased in 1998, each month a portion of the cash collected from the cardholders is paid to the investors to decrease
their remaining invested amount. The amount paid to the investors to decrease their invested amount totaled $7.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2003, and
$8.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2002. Under the current terms of the securitization, the amount paid to the investors to reduce their invested amount equals 100% of the
cash collected less servicing fees paid to CompuCredit and less interest charges on the invested amount. CompuCredit is responsible for financing any new purchases. For the three months ended
March 31, 2003, CompuCredit was required to finance approximately $7 thousand in purchases. For the three months ended March 31, 2002, CompuCredit was not required to finance any
purchases. As of March 31, 2003, the total due to the investors in the securitization structure associated with the portfolios that were purchased in 1998 was approximately $41.2 million
and the retained interest was $14.9 million. As of December 31, 2002, the total due to the investors in the securitization structure was approximately $49.1 million, and the
retained interest was $14.3 million.

The excess cash from the securitization structure associated with the Fingerhut Trust retained interests we purchased in 2002 was $86.3 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2003. As of March 31, 2003, the total due to the investors in the securitization structure associated with the purchased Fingerhut Trust retained interests was approximately
$292.5 million, the gross retained interests were carried at $0.2 million and the servicing liability was carried at $53.4 million. The amortization of the servicing liability
associated with this securitization structure was $13.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2003. The timing of the amortization of the servicing liability will not be affected
by the occurrence in March 2003 of the minimum principal balance early amortization trigger within the Fingerhut Trust.

22

---

Once
the investors in each of our securitization structures are repaid, all cash collected on any remaining receivables is payable to us. We detail the maturity dates and describe our
facilities and amounts being used to repay investors in the "Securitization Facilities" section below.

We
include in our consolidated financial statements all of our wholly owned subsidiaries. However, in accordance with Statement No. 140, we do not consolidate any of the trusts,
all of which are QSPEs. We are required to service the receivables that have been sold. We also perform the administrative functions for the trusts, including preparing daily and monthly reports
relating to the receivables. We do this pursuant to an administration agreement between the trustees of the trusts and us.

Our
securitization documents require us, as servicer of the receivables, to covenant that we will (1) maintain an acceptable ratio of tangible net worth to total managed
receivables and (2) not default in the payment of material indebtedness or reduce the periodic finance charges assessed on the receivables below agreed upon levels. We have also agreed to
service the receivables in accordance with our servicing policies and procedures. In addition to the above, there are events described in our agreements that may trigger an early redemption, which
would cause substantially all collections on the receivables to go to the investors to pay the principal on the notes. This would largely delay the payment of cash to us with respect to our seller's
interests until the investors' notes were paid in full. These events include our failure as servicer to remit the collections that we receive from cardholders to the appropriate securitization
accounts within the required time frames, our failure to provide reports regarding the activity in the accounts within required time frames or a breach of our representations and warranties. These
events also include financial performance measures on the underlying receivables. As servicer of the accounts, we do not covenant or make any representation or warranty regarding the collectibility of
the receivables in the accounts.

Our
securitization documents require us, as the seller of the receivables, to make representations and warranties relating to the validity and the enforceability of the agreements
pursuant to which the receivables were created. We also make other standard representations and warranties including our ability to enter into the agreements and the accuracy of the information
provided by us to investors. If we breach any of these representations, we may not be able to sell additional receivables into our securitization structures, and we may cause an early redemption
event. As seller of the receivables, we do not make any representation or warranty regarding the collectibility of the receivables in the accounts.

As
of March 31, 2003, we have not breached any representations or warranties or otherwise caused an early redemption event, and the underlying performance of the receivables has
not caused an early redemption event in any of our securitizations except that during the first quarter of 2003, and in line with our expectations at the time of our acquisition of and projections
upon which we based our purchase price for the Fingerhut Trust retained interests, Fingerhut Trust Series 1998-2 triggered an early amortization as a result of the minimum principal
balance of receivables in the trust falling below the minimum balance required by the series.

Selected Credit Card Data

Our securitizations are treated as sales under GAAP. As such, we remove the securitized receivables from our consolidated balance sheet. The performance of the
underlying credit card receivables will nevertheless affect the future cash flows we actually receive.

The
information in the following table is presented to reflect the credit card receivables that we have securitized, the credit card receivables associated with retained interests that
we have acquired (e.g., from Federated in 2002) and 50% of the credit card receivables underlying the CSG Trust (which reflects our ownership percentage in CSG)together, our managed
receivables as discussed above. We have included 50% of the managed receivables underlying the CSG Trust because we have a 50% interest in CSG, which owns the retained interest in the CSG Trust. CSG's
cash flows and income are

23

---

dependent
on how the receivables in the CSG Trust perform, and therefore, our cash flows and income are dependent upon 50% of the managed receivables. In addition to owning our 50% interest in CSG, we
are the servicer for 100% of the receivables in the CSG Trust, and we receive a servicing fee from the CSG Trust which we believe to be adequate compensation for the servicing we perform.

We provide the selected credit card data included within this section so that readers can evaluate our performance as a servicer with respect to the portfolios of credit card receivables
that we manage. As noted in our "Off Balance Sheet Arrangements" section, performance metrics and data based on these managed receivables are key to any evaluation of the Company's performance in
managing (including underwriting, valuing purchased receivables, servicing and collecting) the portfolios of receivables underlying our off-balance sheet securitization facilities, as well
as to any comparison of our Company to others within the specialty finance industry.

As discussed in significant detail within our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, the portfolios of receivables that we acquired in
1998, as well as the retained interests in the CSG Trust and the Federated Trust acquired in 2002, were acquired at substantial discounts. In all of these cases, our acquisition prices were
discounted, in part, because we attributed either little or no value to certain receivables that were at a late stage of delinquency in the hands of the sellers. Because such receivables were either
near or in the process of being charged off by the sellers and because we ascribed no or low values to these receivables, including these receivables within our managed receivables data would distort
the performance measurements of our Company as a servicer (and effectively would attribute the performance results of the sellers to us). As such, the period end and average managed receivables data
(as well as delinquency and charge-off statistics) that follow within this section exclude the receivables associated with all accounts in late delinquency status in the sellers' hands as
of the date of our acquisition of the receivables or an interest therein. Pursuant to this treatment, the only activity within the following statistical data associated with these excluded accounts
are recoveries with respect to the excluded accounts, which we include within the numerator of the "Other credit card income ratio" computation, as well as the costs



of pursuing these recoveries, which we include within the numerator of the "Operating ratio" computation.

|                               |  | As of or for the three months ended |          
|------------------------------ |  | ----------------------------------- | ---------
|
|
|
|Period-end managed receivables |  | $                                   | 2,470,041
|Period-end managed accounts    |  |                                     | 3,169    
|Average managed receivables    |  | $                                   | 2,636,728
|Net interest margin            |  |                                     | 15.5     
|Other credit card income ratio |  |                                     | 8.2      
|Operating ratio                |  |                                     | 8.4      

The numerator of the net interest margin calculation includes all accrued finance charge and late fee income billed on all outstanding
receivables, less interest expense as well as accrued finance charge and fee charge offs. The numerator of our other credit card income ratio includes other credit card fees billed, such as
over-limit fees, cash advance fees, maintenance fees, miscellaneous fees, interchange income, ancillary product income, and recoveries of acquired defaulted receivables. Our operating
ratio numerator includes all expenses associated with our business, net of any servicing income we receive as servicer for the CSG Trust, other than marketing and solicitation and ancillary product
expenses. Each of the aforementioned ratios is expressed as a percentage of average managed receivables.

Our
net interest margins are influenced by a number of factors, including the level of accrued finance charges and late fees billed, the weighted average cost of funds, amortization of
the accretable yield component of our acquisition discounts for portfolio purchases and the level of our accrued finance charge and fee charge offs. Our net interest margin for the three months ended
March 31, 2003

24

---

was
15.5%, as compared to 17.1% for the three months ended December 31, 2002. Certain accounts in late delinquency status and those at or near charge-off at the time of acquisition
(e.g., at the time of acquisition of our retained interests in the Fingerhut Trust and CSG's acquisition of its retained interests in the CSG Trust) are excluded from our selected credit card data.
For the first six to nine months or so following a portfolio acquisition date, the exclusion of these accounts will yield diminished charge offs of accrued finance charges and fees. As we saw
beginning with the fourth quarter of 2002, the level of accrued finance charge and fee charge-offs normalize with the seasoning of the acquired portfolios. That is the
non-excluded accounts that we have acquired age into later delinquency buckets and charge off. This explains the reduction of our net interest margin beginning with the fourth quarter of
2002 and continuing on into the first quarter of 2003. We expect this phenomenon to stabilize late in the second quarter of 2003.

Each
quarter, we re-underwrite our portfolio to price our products to appropriately reflect the level of each customer's credit risk. As part of this underwriting process,
existing customers may be offered increased or decreased pricing depending on their credit risk, as well as their supply of and demand for credit. Increases in pricing may increase our net interest
margin, while decreases in pricing may reduce our net interest margin.

Our
other credit card income ratio and our operating ratio both increased in the three months ended March 31, 2003, principally given the income of and expenses associated with
our new recovery operations. While there is income and expense associated with these new recovery operations during the three months ended March 31, 2003, there is not (and in the future will
not be) a commensurate level of average managed receivables in the denominator of the respective ratio computations. While our average managed receivables balances generally reflect the face amount of
the receivables that we manage, we believe it would be inappropriate to include, and thus we have chosen not to include, the face amount of our acquired charged off credit card receivables paper
within our average managed receivables balances.

Asset Quality

Our delinquency and charge off data at any point in time reflects the credit performance of our managed receivables. The average age of our credit card accounts,
the timing of portfolio purchases, the success of our collection and recovery efforts and general economic conditions all affect our delinquency and charge off rates. The average age of our credit
card account portfolio also affects the stability of delinquency and loss rates of the portfolio.

Our
strategy for managing delinquency and receivables losses consists of active account management throughout the customer relationship. This strategy includes credit line management and
pricing based on the risk of the credit card accounts. See "Collection Strategies" below for further discussion.

See
Item VII of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 for a discussion of trends through December 31, 2002. The discussion
herein will focus on the change in this information as of and for the three months ended March 31, 2003.

Delinquencies.Delinquencies have the potential to impact net income in the form of net credit losses. Delinquencies are also
costly in terms of the personnel and resources dedicated to resolving them. A credit card account is contractually delinquent if the minimum payment is not received by the specified date on the
customer's statement. It is our policy to continue to accrue interest and fee income on all credit card accounts, except in limited circumstances, until the account and all related receivables,
interest and other fees are charged off. See the "Charge offs" discussion as well.

We
are using our account management strategies on our portfolio, which are intended to reduce the expected increase in delinquency rates as our managed portfolio continues to mature.
Examples of

25

---

management
strategies include conservative credit line management, purging of inactive accounts and collection strategies (see "Collections Strategies" below) intended to optimize the effective
account-to-collector ratio across delinquency buckets. We measure the success of these efforts by measuring delinquency rates. These rates exclude accounts that have been
charged off.

The
following table presents the delinquency trends of our credit card receivables on a managed receivables portfolio basis:

|                                                       |  | As of |        
|------------------------------------------------------ |  | ----- | -------
|
|
|
|Receivables delinquent:                                |  |       |        
|30 to 59 days past due                                 |  | $     | 99,723 
|60 to 89 days past due                                 |  |       | 80,234 
|90 or more days past due                               |  |       | 247,903
|                                                       |  |       |        
|Total 30 or more days past due                         |  | $     | 427,860
|                                                       |  |       |        
|Total 60 or more days past due                         |  | $     | 328,137
|                                                       |  |       |        
|Receivables delinquent as % of period-end receivables: |  |       |        
|30 to 59 days past due                                 |  |       | 3.9    
|60 to 89 days past due                                 |  |       | 3.3    
|90 or more days past due                               |  |       | 10.0   
|                                                       |  |       |        
|Total 30 or more days past due                         |  |       | 17.2   
|                                                       |  |       |        
|Total 60 or more days past due                         |  |       | 13.3   
|                                                       |  |       |        

Our 60 or more days past due delinquency rates have decreased due to the results of new management and improved collection strategies including
our ability to implement such techniques in a timely manner, in particular, as it relates to the receivables of the Fingerhut Trust. Additionally, the first quarter of each year tends to reflect a
seasonally higher payment period relative to other quarters of the year.

The
following table separately reports our receivables delinquency trends for our originated portfolio:

|                                                       |  | As of |        
|------------------------------------------------------ |  | ----- | -------
|
|
|
|Originated Portfolio                                   |  |       |        
|Receivables delinquent:                                |  |       |        
|30 to 59 days past due                                 |  | $     | 56,066 
|60 to 89 days past due                                 |  |       | 46,803 
|90 or more days past due                               |  |       | 135,259
|                                                       |  |       |        
|Total 30 or more days past due                         |  | $     | 238,128
|                                                       |  |       |        
|Total 60 or more days past due                         |  | $     | 182,062
|                                                       |  |       |        
|Receivables Delinquent as % of period-end receivables: |  |       |        
|30 to 59 days past due                                 |  |       | 3.8    
|60 to 89 days past due                                 |  |       | 3.1    
|90 or more days past due                               |  |       | 9.0    
|                                                       |  |       |        
|Total 30 or more days past due                         |  |       | 15.9   
|                                                       |  |       |        
|Total 60 or more days past due                         |  |       | 12.1   
|                                                       |  |       |        

26

---

Our delinquency rates have decreased in general due the results of new collections initiatives as well as the seasonality factor discussed previously.

The
following table separately reports our receivables delinquency trends for our purchased portfolio:

|                                                       |  | As of |        
|------------------------------------------------------ |  | ----- | -------
|
|
|
|Purchased Portfolio                                    |  |       |        
|Receivables delinquent:                                |  |       |        
|30 to 59 days past due                                 |  | $     | 28,563 
|60 to 89 days past due                                 |  |       | 20,498 
|90 or more days past due                               |  |       | 63,027 
|                                                       |  |       |        
|Total 30 or more days past due                         |  | $     | 112,088
|                                                       |  |       |        
|Total 60 or more days past due                         |  | $     | 83,525 
|                                                       |  |       |        
|Receivables Delinquent as % of period-end receivables: |  |       |        
|30 to 59 days past due                                 |  |       | 5.0    
|60 to 89 days past due                                 |  |       | 3.6    
|90 or more days past due                               |  |       | 11.0   
|                                                       |  |       |        
|Total 30 or more days past due                         |  |       | 19.6   
|                                                       |  |       |        
|Total 60 or more days past due                         |  |       | 14.6   
|                                                       |  |       |        

Our delinquency rates have decreased in general due the results of our new collections initiatives as well as the seasonality factor discussed
previously. In particular, as related to the receivables underlying the Fingerhut Trust, we are seeing much stronger performance than originally anticipated or projected based on the impact that
several new management team members and their added collections initiatives are having on the Fingerhut collections operations.

The
following table presents our receivables delinquency trends for 50% of the receivables underlying the CSG Trust:

|                                                       |  | As of |       
|------------------------------------------------------ |  | ----- | ------
|
|50% of CSG Trust                                       |  |       |       
|Receivables delinquent:                                |  |       |       
|30 to 59 days past due                                 |  | $     | 15,094
|60 to 89 days past due                                 |  |       | 12,934
|90 or more days past due                               |  |       | 49,617
|                                                       |  |       |       
|Total 30 or more days past due                         |  | $     | 77,645
|                                                       |  |       |       
|Total 60 or more days past due                         |  | $     | 62,551
|                                                       |  |       |       
|Receivables Delinquent as % of period-end receivables: |  |       |       
|30 to 59 days past due                                 |  |       | 3.8   
|60 to 89 days past due                                 |  |       | 3.2   
|90 or more days past due                               |  |       | 12.4  
|                                                       |  |       |       
|Total 30 or more days past due                         |  |       | 19.4  
|                                                       |  |       |       
|Total 60 or more days past due                         |  |       | 15.6  
|                                                       |  |       |       

27

---

Delinquency
rates within the receivables underlying the CSG Trust demonstrate (1) one particular bucket with a greater than typical level of delinquent accounts that is now 90 or
more days past due, much of which is expected to ultimately be charged off, and (2) the positive effects of our new collection initiatives, as well as the seasonality patterns discussed above,
as reflected in our significantly lower earlier stage delinquencies. We expect CSG Trust receivables 60 or more days past due delinquency rates to stabilize relative to the March 31, 2003 rates
and potentially to even decline as we further see the results of new collections initiatives.

Charge offs.In the tables that follow, the gross yield ratio represents billed finance charges and late fees as a percentage
of average managed receivables. The other credit card income ratio represents the aggregate of other fees and income earned on credit cards (such as annual membership fees,
over-limit fees, cash advance fees, interchange fees, ancillary products revenues, and recoveries of acquired defaulted receivables) as a percentage of average managed receivables.
Combined gross charge offs represent the aggregate amounts of accrued finance charge, fee, and principal losses from customers unwilling or unable to pay their receivables balances, as well as
bankrupt and deceased customers, less current period recoveries. Net charge offs include only the principal amount of these losses, net of recoveries; they exclude accrued finance charges and fee
charge offs, which are charged against the related income at the time of charge off. Losses from fraudulent activity in accounts are also excluded from net charge offs and are included separately in
other operating expenses. We generally charge off receivables when they become contractually 180 days past due. However, bankrupt accounts and the accounts of deceased customers without a
surviving, contractually liable individual or an estate large enough to pay the debt in full are charged off within 30 days of notification of the customer's bankruptcy or death and subsequent
confirmation, if applicable.

For
purposes of reporting adjusted charge offs and the adjusted charge off ratios on the managed receivables below, a discount related to credit quality is utilized to offset a portion
of actual net charge offs. Historically, upon our acquisitions of credit card receivables, a portion of the discount reflected within our acquisition prices relates to the credit quality of the
acquired receivablesthat portion representing the excess of the face amount of the receivables acquired over the expected future principal cash flows expected to be collected from the
receivables. Because we treat the credit quality discount component of our acquisition discount as related exclusively to acquired principal balances, the difference between our net charge offs and
our adjusted charge offs for each respective reporting period represents the total dollar amount of our charge offs that were charged against our credit quality discount during each respective
reporting period.

The
following table presents the charge off data for all of the credit card receivables underlying our securitizations as well as 50% of the receivables underlying the CSG Trust:

|                                |  | 2003 |         | 2002 |   | 2001    |  
|------------------------------- |  | ---- | ------- | ---- | - | ------- | -
|
|Gross yield ratio               |  |      | 33.5    | %    |   | 34.0    | %
|Other credit card income ratio  |  |      | 8.2     | %    |   | 6.0     | %
|Combined gross charge offs      |  | $    | 240,336 |      | $ | 248,919 |  
|Net charge offs                 |  | $    | 133,667 |      | $ | 123,877 |  
|Adjusted charge offs            |  | $    | 67,180  |      | $ | 67,193  |  
|Combined gross charge off ratio |  |      | 36.5    | %    |   | 34.2    | %
|Net charge off ratio            |  |      | 20.3    | %    |   | 17.0    | %
|Adjusted charge off ratio       |  |      | 10.2    | %    |   | 9.2     | %

Gross yield decreased in the three months ended March 31, 2003 due to the declining nature of our portfolios. That is, as the amount of our
managed receivables have decreased, so have our financed charges and late fees, but at a slightly higher rate as more accounts are paid off or charged off resulting in a mix with a lower average
finance charge rate.

28

---

Our
other credit card income ratio increased in the first quarter of 2003 principally due to increased recoveries associated with the performance of our new unit focused on the purchase
and collection of defaulted accounts. (See also the discussion above concerning the denominator effect within the other credit card income ratio computation given that acquired charged off credit card
receivables are not included within the denominator of the ratio computation.) While the results of our new unit focused on the collection of defaulted receivables are included in the other credit
card income ratio within the above table, they are excluded from the remaining tables within this section because such results are not tied to any particular portfolio of managed receivables.

Analysis
of the above charge off data for the three months ended March 31, 2003 shows (1) decreasing combined gross charge offs, which have decreased at a slower rate than
the reduction in our average managed receivables; (2) increasing net charge offs; (3) and an increase in all of the combined gross charge off, net charge off and adjusted charge off
ratios. Most of these trends were expected by management and are caused by the exclusion of any acquired accounts that were at a late stage of delinquency and at or near charge off by the seller on
the dates of our 2002 portfolio acquisitions. This effect of our portfolio acquisitions began to normalize within our charge off data in the fourth quarter of 2002 and continued in 2003; this occurs
as some portion of the non-excluded acquired receivables season into later stage delinquency status and ultimately are charged off during the first six to nine months or so following an
acquisition. This phenomenon accounts for most of the adverse trends experienced during the three months ended March 31, 2003, but does not account for the entire level of adversity in the
trends (i.e., as evidenced by the increase in our adjusted charge off ratio during the first quarter of 2003). Reductions in our combined gross charge offs and our efforts to keep adjusted charge offs
in line with prior quarter results were offset by the effects of average managed receivables decreases within the denominator of the respective ratio calculations.

The
following table presents the charge off data for our originated portfolio:

|                                |  | 2003 |         | 2002 |   | 2001    |  
|------------------------------- |  | ---- | ------- | ---- | - | ------- | -
|
|Gross yield ratio               |  |      | 32.4    | %    |   | 32.6    | %
|Other credit card income ratio  |  |      | 6.3     | %    |   | 7.6     | %
|Combined gross charge offs      |  | $    | 131,411 |      | $ | 138,362 |  
|Net charge offs                 |  | $    | 65,068  |      | $ | 65,336  |  
|Combined gross charge off ratio |  |      | 33.8    | %    |   | 34.4    | %
|Net charge off ratio            |  |      | 16.8    | %    |   | 16.2    | %

The decline in the other credit card income ratio is due to our growth slowdown during this period, which has resulted in a declining number of
new cardholders, which yield higher ancillary product revenues than our mature cardholder relationships. Our combined gross charge off ratio has declined due to seasonality (i.e., the first quarter is
generally a period of higher payments). Additionally, this is the result of the impact of the new collection strategies that we have implemented as discussed previously. The net charge off ratio was
adversely impacted by the decline in the average managed receivables balances within the denominator of the ratio calculation while the absolute dollar amount of net charge offs was fairly constant.

29

---

The following table presents the charge off data for our purchased portfolio:

|                                |  | 2003 |        | 2002 |   | 2001   |  
|------------------------------- |  | ---- | ------ | ---- | - | ------ | -
|
|Gross yield ratio               |  |      | 38.5   | %    |   | 40.4   | %
|Other credit card income ratio  |  |      | 0.3    | %    |   | 0.2    | %
|Combined gross charge offs      |  | $    | 69,167 |      | $ | 71,729 |  
|Net charge offs                 |  | $    | 42,457 |      | $ | 34,245 |  
|Adjusted charge offs            |  | $    | 2,112  |      | $ | 1,857  |  
|Combined gross charge off ratio |  |      | 42.5   | %    |   | 35.4   | %
|Net charge off ratio            |  |      | 26.1   | %    |   | 16.9   | %
|Adjusted charge off ratio       |  |      | 1.3    | %    |   | 0.9    | %

Gross yield decreased in the three months ended March 31, 2003 due to the declining nature of our portfolios. That is, as the amount of our
managed receivables have decreased, so have our finance charges and late fees, but at a slightly higher rate as more accounts are paid off or charged off resulting in a mix with a lower average
finance charge rate.

The
general negative trend in our charge off data for the purchased portfolio reflects the fact that we did not record within our managed receivables data any acquired receivables that
were at a late stage of delinquency and at or near charge off by the seller on the date of our acquisition of the Fingerhut portfolio of managed receivables. This effect of our portfolio acquisitions
began to normalize within our charge off data in the fourth quarter of 2002 and continued into the first quarter of 2003; this occurs as some portion of the non-excluded acquired
receivables season into later stage delinquency status and ultimately are charged off during the first six to nine months or so following an acquisition.

The
following table presents the charge off data for 50% of the receivables underlying the CSG Trust:

|                                |  | Mar. 31, 2003 |        | Dec. 31, 2002 |   | Sep. 30, 2002 |   | Jun. 30, 2002 |       
|------------------------------- |  | ------------- | ------ | ------------- | - | ------------- | - | ------------- | ------
|Gross yield ratio               |  |               | 29.8   | %             |   | 28.0          | % |               | 28.8  
|Other credit card income ratio  |  |               | 6.6    | %             |   | 5.1           | % |               | 4.9   
|Combined gross charge offs      |  | $             | 39,758 |               | $ | 38,827        |   | $             | 34,667
|Net charge offs                 |  | $             | 26,142 |               | $ | 24,296        |   | $             | 4,252 
|Adjusted net charge offs        |  | $             |       |               | $ |              |   | $             |      
|Combined gross charge off ratio |  |               | 36.8   | %             |   | 31.6          | % |               | 26.2  
|Net charge off ratio            |  |               | 24.2   | %             |   | 19.8          | % |               | 3.2   
|Adjusted charge off ratio       |  |               |       | %             |   |              | % |               |      

Gross
yield increased due to the fact that finance charges, while declining, are not declining as rapidly as the overall level of CSG Trust managed receivables. This has resulted because
as more accounts have paid off or charged off we have experienced a mix with a higher average finance charge rate because of certain rate increases introduced late in the fourth quarter of 2002.

The
other credit card income ratio increased due to the fact that membership and miscellaneous fees actually increased while the overall level of CSG Trust managed receivables
declinedagain due to the relative change in the mix in accounts towards those that tend to buy memberships or incur additional fees.

The
slight negative trend in our charge offs for the CSG Trust managed receivables reflects the fact that we did not record within our managed receivables data any acquired receivables
that were at a late stage of delinquency and at or near charge off by the seller on the date of our acquisition of the CSG Trust portfolio of managed receivables. This effect of our portfolio
acquisitions began to normalize within our charge off data in the fourth quarter of 2002 and continued into the first quarter

30

---

of
2003; this occurs as some portion of the non-excluded acquired receivables season into later stage delinquency status and ultimately are charged off during the first six to nine months
or so following an acquisition. The slight negative trends in the absolute charge off levels were magnified within the respective charge off ratio computations for the three months ended
March 31, 2003 by the effects of significant average managed receivables decreases within the denominator of the respective ratio calculations.

Credit Losses.For securitized receivables, anticipated credit losses, as well as actual charge offs, are reflected in the
calculation of income from retained interests in credit card receivables securitized. In evaluating credit losses for purposes of our GAAP computations, we take into consideration several factors,
including (1) historical charge off and recovery activity by receivables portfolio, (2) recent and expected delinquency and collection trends by receivables portfolio, (3) the
impact of current economic conditions and recent economic trends on the customers' ability to repay and (4) the risk characteristics of the portfolios. All of our credit card receivables have
been securitized. Because we have securitized our receivables, we have removed them from our balance sheets within our GAAP financial statements.

Collections Strategies.The goal of the collection process is to collect as much money from the cardholder as possible in the
most cost effective and efficient manner. To this end, we employ competitive
techniques that focus on having the lowest possible delinquencies for our portfolios. As part of our collection analysis and consistent with what we believe to be prevalent industry practice, we
evaluate our economic investment in the cardholder (i.e., the principal balance) and aggressively attempt to recover our economic investment made on each receivable.

We consider management's experience in operating professional collection agencies, coupled with our proprietary systems, to be a competitive advantage in minimizing delinquencies and
charge off losses. Our collectors employ various and evolving tools when working with a cardholder, and they routinely test and evaluate new tools in their drive toward improving our collections with
the greatest degree of efficiency possible. These tools include programs under which we may reduce or eliminate a cardholder's APR or waive a certain amount of accrued late fees, provided the
cardholder makes a minimum number or amount of payments. In some instances, we may agree to match a customer's payments, for example, with a commensurate reduction of accrued finance charges or waiver
of accrued late fees. In other situations, we may actually settle with customers and adjust their accrued finance charges and accrued late fees, for example, based on their commitment and their follow
through on their commitment to pay certain portions of the balances that they owe. Our collectors may also decrease a customer's minimum payment once a certain number of minimum payments are received.
Additionally, we employ reaging techniques (i.e., make a customer current after a certain number or amount of payments are received) in accordance with applicable Federal Financial Institution
Examination Counsel ("FFIEC") guidelines. We also may occasionally use our marketing group to assist in determining various programs to assist in the collection process. Moreover, we willingly
participate in the Consumer Credit Counseling Service ("CCCS") program by waiving a certain percent of a customer's debt that is considered our "fair share" under the CCCS program. All of our programs
are utilized based on the degree of economic success they achieve.

We
are constantly monitoring and adapting our collection strategies, techniques, technology and training to optimize our efforts to reduce delinquencies and charge offs. We use our
systems to develop these proprietary collection strategies and techniques, which we employ in our operations. We analyze the output from these systems to identify the strategies and techniques that we
believe are most likely to result in curing a delinquent account in the most cost-effective manner, rather than treating all accounts the same based on the mere passage of time.

Our
collection strategies include utilizing both internal and third-party collectors and creating a competitive process of rewarding the most effective and efficient group of collectors
from within our system and among third-party agencies. We divide our portfolios into various groups that are

31

---

statistically
equivalent and provide these groups of accounts to our various internal and external collection shops. We compare the results of the internal and external collectors against one another
to determine which techniques and which collection groups are producing the best results.

The
various credit card data and charge off statistics above generally reflect our application of customer payments first to accrued finance charges, then to fees, and then to principal.
However,
pursuant to the payment application discretion that we have under our cardholder agreements, we have varied from this general payment application priority where appropriate at certain stages of an
account's delinquency to assist our collectors in evaluating our cardholder relationships against our economic investment made in the cardholder relationship. To assist them in making this evaluation,
we have, in certain circumstances and at certain stages of an account's delinquency, applied customer payments first to principal and then to accrued finance charges and fees. Application of payments
in this manner permits our collectors to know real time the degree to which a customer's payments over the life of an account have covered the principal credit extensions to the customer over the life
of the account. This allows our collectors to readily identify our potential "economic" loss associated with a charge off of a particular account (i.e., the excess of principal loaned to the customer
over payments received back from the customer throughout the life of the account). Armed with this information, our collectors will focus on settling with customers in a way that ideally will best
protect us from economic loss on the cardholder relationship. Under this approach, for example, our collectors may forgo collections of accrued finance charges and fees in order to preserve our
opportunity to at least achieve repayment of our principal credit extensions to the cardholder. Our selection of collection techniques, including, for example, whether we apply payments to finance
charges or principal, impacts the statistical performance of our portfolios.

As
in all aspects of our risk management strategies, we compare the results of each of the above strategies with other collection strategies and devote resources to those strategies that
yield the best results. Results are measured based on delinquency rates, expected losses and costs to collect. Existing strategies are then adjusted as suggested by these results. Management believes
that maintaining the ongoing discipline of testing, measuring and adjusting collection strategies will result in minimized bad debt losses and operating expenses. We believe this on-going
evaluation differs from the approach taken by the vast majority of credit grantors that implement collection strategies based on commonly accepted peer group practices.

Results of Operations

Three Months Ended March 31, 2003, Compared to Three Months Ended March 31, 2002

The following results have been restated for the effects of the application of the cost recovery method for our Jefferson Capital charged off paper recovery
operations ($3.7 million decrease in net income, or $0.07 per share for the three months ended March 31, 2003). See Note 1, "Restatement of Financial Statements," for further
discussion.

Net income for the three months ended March 31, 2003 was $30.6 million, an increase of $28.5 million from net income of $2.1 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2002. Net income attributable to common shareholders for the three months ended March 31, 2003, was $29.5 million, or $0.60 per diluted share, compared to net
income attributable to common shareholders of $1.1 million, or $0.02 per diluted share for the three months ended March 31, 2002. The increase in our net income was principally due to
the earnings of our equity method-investee ($14.3 million pre-tax income), the positive performance of our acquired retained interests in the Fingerhut Trust ($65.4 million of pre-tax
income from retained interests in credit card receivables securitized), and the servicing fees that we earn associated with the managed receivables of the CSG Trust ($10.6 million pre-tax
servicing income). These positive effects were partially offset, however, by the application of the residual cash flows discount rate to a higher required level of credit enhancements (in the form of
over collateralization)

32

---

within our retained interests in the originated portfolio at March 31, 2003 and the decline in the managed receivables underlying and the corresponding reduction in billings within our
originated portfolio ($37.7 million of pre-tax loss from retained interests in credit card receivables securitized).

We
have decreased our marketing because we believe that, while we have access to liquidity for our origination activities, the advance rates and other terms underlying this available
liquidity do not allow us to earn our, and our shareholders', desired returns on equity. We have chosen to focus our 2003 growth efforts on portfolio acquisition, rather than marketing and origination
activities for our traditional underserved market. We do anticipate some marketing efforts and originations, however, during 2003, pursuant to our efforts to move down to the lower end of the FICO
scoring system with more of a fee-based card product in 2003.

Net Interest (Expense) Income

Net interest (expense) income consists of interest income earned on cash and cash equivalents less interest expense. Net interest expense was $2.1 million
for the three months ended March 31, 2003, compared to net interest income of $0.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2002. The decrease in net interest income of
$2.4 million during 2003 is due primarily to interest expense associated with the debt used to purchase our ownership interest in CSG in the second quarter of 2002. While this loan was paid off
during 2002, the lender is entitled to receive a portion of excess cash flows received by the Company from CSG. These payments are classified as interest expense. As such, we anticipate interest
expense decreasing over the remainder of 2003, commensurate with our expected reduction in receipts of excess cash flows from CSG throughout the remainder of 2003.

Income from Retained Interests in Credit Card Receivables Securitized

Retained interests in credit card receivables securitized are valued in accordance with the provisions of Statement No. 140 and EITF 99-20.
Retained interests accounted for under Statement No. 140 are subsequently accounted for as trading securities and reported at estimated fair market value in accordance with Financial Accounting
Standard No. 115, "Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities" ("Statement No. 115"). See "Off Balance Sheet Arrangements."

We had income from retained interests in credit card receivables securitized as follows:

Three Months Ended March 31,2003

2002Income from retained interests in credit
card receivables securitized (in millions):Originated portfolio

$
(30.0
)
$
7.7Purchased portfolio (1)


66.3


(2.0
)Total

$
36.3

$
5.7


---

This change resulted principally from the strong performance of our retained interests in the Fingerhut Trust (acquired in July 2002), partially offset, however, by the
anticipated reduction in the profitability of the retained interests in our originated portfolio. Profitability reductions associated with the retained interests in our originated portfolio have
resulted from our ceasing of marketing efforts with respect to the portfolio, which has stopped growth through the addition of new accounts to the portfolio and caused a greater percentage of our
originated portfolio managed receivables to age into two and three-plus year vintages for which higher charge-offs are the norm. Further, the application of

33

---

the residual cash flows discount rate to a higher required level of credit enhancements (in the form of over collateralization) within our retained interests in the originated portfolio at
March 31, 2003 has also reduced profitability. Additionally, because the Fingerhut Trust triggered an early amortization event in March of 2003 (as discussed further in the Liquidity, Funding,
and Capital Resources section), the Company anticipates significantly reduced income under EITF 99-20 associated with the Fingerhut Trust throughout the remainder of 2003 and through the first
half of 2004.

Management
estimates the fair value of the retained interests at the end of each period. Fair value is estimated as the amount the retained interests could be bought for, or sold for, in
a current transaction between willing parties, specifically, other than in a forced liquidation. We believe that quoted market prices in active markets are the best evidence of fair value. Because
quoted market prices are not available for our retained interests, the estimated fair value is based on the best information available under the circumstances. As such, we utilize a discounted cash
flow approach, under which our estimated future cash flows are discounted at the estimated rate of return that we believe an investor in our retained interests would expect to be associated with such
an investment (the "residual cash flows discount rate"). Our computations of fair value are, therefore, based on the estimated present value of future cash flows using our best estimates of finance
charges and late fees, servicing fees, costs of funds paid to investors, payment rates, credit losses, discount rates and required amortization payments to investors. The weighted average key
assumptions used to value the interest-only strip and servicing liability for the receivables that we have securitized as of the end of each period are presented below. Changes in any of
these assumptions could impact the estimates of the fair value of our retained interests as well as the realization of expected future cash flows:

|                                       |  | As of |  
|-------------------------------------- |  | ----- | -
|
|
|
|Assumptions                            |  |       |  
|Payment rate (monthly)                 |  | 6.8   | %
|Expected credit loss rate (annualized) |  | 18.4  | %
|Residual cash flows discount rate      |  | 22.5  | %
|Servicing liability discount rate      |  | 14.1  | %



Estimated
default and payment rates are based on historical results, adjusted for expected changes based on our credit risk models. The payment rate decreased during 2002, primarily due
to the seasoning of the originated portfolio and the effects of the generally poor economic climate on our cardholders. Expected credit loss rates have increased due to the generally poor economic
climate, increases in our delinquencies and our expected overall credit quality decline within our portfolios given the trending higher weighted-average age of the portfolios. We compare historical
loss rates on each vintage of our portfolio at comparable points in their lives to project our expected credit loss rate. Our servicing liability discount rate is based on management's estimate of the
required returns for companies who service similar assets.

The
residual cash flow discount rate is dependant on the asset backed securities market and the various companies that make up this market (e.g., Providian, Capital One, Metris, and
CompuCredit). The asset backed securities market is influenced by the results of the issuers who participate in the market, as well as (a) the reaction of rating agencies to the results of
issuers, (b) general economic conditions and (c) the investment appetite of investors, which include banks, commercial paper conduits administered by banks, money market funds, pension
funds, hedge funds and insurance companies. Also, as demonstrated to us in December 2001, they also are impacted by our own perceived liquidity and negotiating positions. However, absent
exigent circumstances, the asset backed

34

---

securities
market tends to react to the overall performance of the group as opposed to the individual companies comprising the group (i.e., the advance rates, pricing and terms available are
responsive to the peer group that includes us, as opposed to just us).

Our
residual cash flows discount rate was volatile during the latter part of 2001 and the first half of 2002. That volatility was unprecedented and unforeseen, both by us and other
market participants, but reflected the prevailing market conditions in the asset backed securities market as well as our own liquidity. During the fourth quarter of 2001, we completed transactions at
very unfavorable pricing, which yielded a 35% return to the buyers. This pricing reflected the deterioration of the asset backed securities markets and our near-term liquidity needs in
December 2001. The December transaction was the most readily available information upon which to base the Company's fourth quarter 2001 discount rate estimateat this point we
increased our discount rate to 34.9%. During the first quarter of 2002, due to the continued general weakness of the economy and the continued stress and liquidity challenges that we saw in the asset
backed securities markets, we did not believe that there was sufficient evidence to warrant a reduction in our discount rate. In the second quarter of 2002, however, our liquidity position improved
with the purchase (through our 50%-owned equity method investee, CSG) of the retained interests from Providian. Additionally, we finalized the terms of a new securitization structure with more
favorable advance rates, pricing and other terms. As a result, we concluded, after consultation with and corroboration by an independent third-party valuation firm, that a reduction in our discount
rate was warranted. The valuation techniques utilized by the third-party valuation firm included analyzing our recent transactions and our competitors (both direct and indirect) discount rates and
cost of equity, with equal weighting given to each. Since June of 2002, we have not seen any evidence indicating that any further adjustment in our discount rate is necessary; thus, our residual cash
flows discount rate has remained at 22.5% at the end of all financial reporting periods since the second quarter of 2002.

The various assumptions in the above table relate only to receivables that we have securitized and do not apply to retained interests that we have purchased. The Fingerhut Trust retained
interests purchased by the Company during 2002 are carried at the lower of amortized cost or fair market value, net of a servicing liability. In accordance with EITF 99-20, expected cash
flows in excess of the cost of the purchased retained interests are being amortized into income from retained interests using the effective interest method; during the three months ended
March 31, 2003, $65.4 million of such excess cash flows were amortized into income under EITF 99-20. Because the Fingerhut Trust triggered an early amortization event in March of 2003
(as discussed further in the Liquidity, Funding, and Capital Resources section), the Company anticipates significantly reduced income under EITF 99-20 associated with the Fingerhut Trust throughout
the remainder of 2003 and the first half of 2004.

Our
retained interests in credit card receivables securitized include the following:

Mar. 31,
2003

Dec. 31,
2002(In thousands)I/O strip

$
87,780

$
99,964Servicing liability


(90,727
)

(108,010
)Fair value of Seller's Interest


311,445


283,681Retained interests in credit card receivables securitized

$
308,498

$
275,635


The
I/O strip reflects the estimated fair value of our rights to future income from the portfolios and includes certain credit enhancements. The servicing liability reflects, for those
securitizations for which servicing compensation is not adequate, the estimated fair value of the costs to service receivables above and beyond the servicing income we expect to receive from the
securitizations. The change in the servicing liability associated with the Fingerhut Trust (a reduction of $13.5 million in the three months ended March 31, 2003) is included in
servicing income. The fair value of retained

35

---

interests
includes all of the retained interests we own in the securitizations. Our I/O strip has decreased from December 31, 2002, primarily due to the fact that we did not add any significant
new accounts or receivables during the three months ended March 31, 2003, combined with the continued reduction in the balance of receivables underlying our retained interests in the Fingerhut
Trust. The reduction in our servicing liability since December 31, 2002, was expected as the period to which the Fingerhut Trust servicing liability relates has elapsed by another three
monthswhen we purchased the Fingerhut Trust retained interests from Federated in July 2002, we also assumed a servicing liability associated with the retained interests, and that
liability is being amortized over the expected servicing period for the receivables underlying retained interests. The fair value of retained interest increased from December 31, 2002,
principally due to an increase in credit enhancement requirements associated with one of our originated portfolio securitization facilities.

Equity Method Investment in CSG

Under the equity method of accounting for our CSG investment, we recorded approximately $14.3 million of pretax income during the three months ended
March 31, 2003. This income primarily consisted of income from retained interests in credit card receivables securitized that CSG acquired in the second quarter of 2002 from the CSG Trust.
During the three months ended March 31, 2003, we received approximately $19.6 million in cash distributions from CSG.

Other Operating Income

Other operating income, excluding securitization income, income from retained interests in credit card receivables securitized, and our equity in income of equity
method investee, consists of the following for the periods indicated:

Three months ended Mar. 31,2003

2002(In thousands)Gross servicing income

$
27,666

$
1,285Other credit card fees and other income


28,004


33,280Total other operating income

$
55,670

$
34,565


The increase in other operating income to $55.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2003, from $34.6 million for the three months ended March 31,
2002, principally relates to the increase in servicing revenue associated with the purchase of the retained interests in the Fingerhut Trust and the investment in CSG, as we service 100% of both of
these portfolios. The increase in servicing revenue was offset by a decrease in our ancillary product revenue. This revenue category is very sensitive to our new account growth since historically
sales of our fee-based products are higher to our new cardholders than to existing cardholders. During 2003, we originated less accounts than in prior years, and this resulted in the
decrease in ancillary product revenue. Other credit card fee income decreased for the three months ended March 31, 2003, compared to March 31, 2002, due primarily to a decline in the
level of our interchange fees. Interchange fees are the portion of the merchant fee assessed by Visa and MasterCard and passed on to us based on the purchase volume on our credit card receivables.
Interchange fees decreased for the three months ended March 31, 2003, compared to March 31, 2002, primarily due to a decrease in purchase volume of our cardholders. This was in spite of
an overall increase in receivables as the Federated accounts are private label and therefore do not contribute to any additional volume related to our interchange agreements. The reduction in
interchange fees was partially offset, however, by the performance of our new unit focused on the purchase and collection of defaulted receivables.

36

---

Other Operating Expense

Other operating expense consists of the following for the periods indicated:

Three months ended Mar. 31,2003

2002(In thousands)Salaries and benefits

$
4,341

$
3,596Credit card servicing


38,047


20,070Marketing and solicitation


1,587


2,624Depreciation


3,865


3,570Other


8,539


7,462Total other operating expense

$
56,379

$
37,322


Other
operating expense for the three months ended March 31, 2003, increased to $56.4 million, from $37.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2002.
This increase is due primarily to servicing expenses associated with servicing 100% of the receivables in the CSG Trust and the Fingerhut Trust. Credit card servicing costs primarily include
collections and customer service expenses. Within this category of expenses are personnel, service bureau, cardholder correspondence and other direct costs associated with our collections and customer
service efforts. Our credit card servicing costs also include outsourced collections and customer service expenses. Based on the growth of the receivables we service, we have increased our
infrastructure, customer service and collection personnel. Salaries and benefits include the salaries and benefits associated with non-collections and non-customer service
personnel; we have experienced moderate increases for this
category of expense as well given the growth in level of receivables that we manage. Depreciation expense increased due to growth in our infrastructure to support our increase in managed receivables.

In
2003, marketing and solicitation costs decreased due to reduced budgeted levels of direct mail, telemarketing, internet and television campaigns; our 2003 marketing and solicitation
activities are being limited strictly to our new fee-based card offering to consumers at the lower end of the FICO scoring system as discussed above. Ancillary product expense decreased
due to a decrease in ancillary product marketing which resulted in a decrease in ancillary products sold. Data processing increased due to planned spending increases in 2003 versus 2002.

Other
expense includes professional fees, net occupancy costs, ancillary product expense, fraud, travel and entertainment, insurance, hiring expense, corporate communications, leased
equipment expenses, office supplies and other miscellaneous expenses. Our expenses within the other expense category generally have increased incrementally as we have added infrastructure to support
the growth in managed receivables. Our cardholder fraud expense includes the expense of unauthorized use of the credit cards including identity theft or purchases on lost or stolen cards. To date, we
have experienced very little fraud for unauthorized use, and the total expense has approximated 0.05% of our average managed receivables in any given year.

Income Taxes

Income taxes were $17.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2003 and $1.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2002.
Our effective tax rate was 36.0% for 2003 and 35.0% for 2002. The increase was due to certain of our operations now being subject to various state income taxes.

37

---

Liquidity, Funding and Capital Resources

A primary financial goal of the Company is to maintain an adequate level of liquidity through active management of assets and liabilities. At March 31,
2003, we had approximately $113.9 million in unrestricted cash. Because the characteristics of our assets and liabilities change, liquidity management is a dynamic process affected by the
pricing and maturity of our assets and liabilities. We finance our business through cash flows from operations, asset backed securitizations and the issuance of debt and equity:



Our
most significant uses of cash are operating expenses, the purchase of the credit card receivables that arise in the accounts that are issued through our relationship with CB&T and
marketing expenses. We raise cash by selling the credit card receivables into our securitization programs as discussed previously. When we sell the receivables, we receive cash and a retained
interest. Because the amount
of cash that we receive is less than the face amount of the receivables, this retained interest is a use of cash for us. The receivables in the securitization programs then generate cash as the
cardholders make payments on their accounts. This cash is allocated by the securitization agreements to pay us for servicing the receivables, to pay interest on the investors' notes and to repay any
principal portion of the investors' notes that are due. Any excess cash after the above allocations is remitted to us as owner of the retained interests.

As
of March 31, 2003, we had net servicing liabilities of $53.4 million and $37.3 million on our Fingerhut and originated portfolios, respectively. In
March 2003, and as expected, the Fingerhut Trust triggered an early amortization as discussed below. As a result of this, unless this securitization facility is refinanced with more favorable
terms to us, we will experience significantly diminished cash flows from the Fingerhut Trust until all investors are repaid (currently estimated to be the third quarter of 2004). Nevertheless, we
expect that these substantially diminished cash flows will be sufficient throughout the early amortization period to fully fund our excess servicing obligation associated with the Fingerhut managed
receivables. That is, the combination of the servicing fee that we will receive from the Fingerhut Trust during the early amortization period and the excess cash flows that we will receive from the
finance charge collections from the Fingerhut Trust are expected to be sufficient to fully fund the servicing expenses of this portfolio until the investors in the trust are repaid.

Like
the Fingerhut Trust, we also anticipate that the CSG Trust will hit an early amortization trigger and that CSG will stop receiving cash from the CSG Trust beginning in the second
quarter of 2003. The CSG Trust secrutization facility is unique in that it was structured by the seller of the retained interests as a liquidating trustessentially providing for limited
purchasing volume and

38

---

liquidating
account balances over the term of the facility. Moreover, triggers were specifically designed to cause early amortization and repayment to the investors based on the rate of liquidation of
the receivables within the CSG Trust. In evaluating its purchase of the CSG Trust retained interests and in establishing its purchase price for those retained interests, CSG fully anticipated a first
quarter to second quarter of 2003 early amortization event. Once the CSG Trust hits this early amortization trigger, CSG is not expected to resume receipts of cash from the CSG Trust until the middle
of 2006. This event will cause CSG, as our equity method investee, to cease making cash distributions to us. We expect, however, to continue to receive throughout the early amortization period
adequate compensation for servicing the receivables underlying the CSG Trust. We also expect that the CSG Trust will continue to make payments to the Company in respect of interest on notes held by
the Company.

Finally,
while we have never triggered an early amortization within any of the series underlying our originated portfolio securitizations and while we do not believe that we will, it is
conceivable that, even with close management, we may trigger an early amortization of one or more of the outstanding series within our Master Trust as we focus further on reducing the managed
receivables balances within our originated portfolio. Just as the denominator effect discussed in our "Asset Quality" section has caused certain increases in charge off ratios even while the absolute
dollar amount of charge offs has remained flat or even declined, this same effect will be experienced in our net portfolio yield early amortization triggers for the outstanding series within our
Master Trust.

Another
pending use of cash is with respect to our Series A and B preferred stock issuances. To date, we have paid the dividends on our Series A and B preferred stock in
additional shares of preferred stock. If, beginning on December 17, 2003 and measured on the 17th of each following March, June, September and December, the volume-weighted share
price of the common stock for the immediately preceding 20 trading days is less than 106% of the corresponding volume-weighted share price of the common stock for the immediately preceding three month
period, then we will have to pay the Series A and B preferred stock dividends in cash. In addition, we may decide to pay the dividends in cash in any event.

During
the third quarter of 2002, our Board of Directors authorized a program to repurchase up to 5 million shares (approximately 11 percent) of its outstanding common
stock. Under the repurchase plan, the Company may buy back shares of its common stock from time to time either on the open market or through privately negotiated transactions in compliance with SEC
guidelines. These shares are carried at cost on our consolidated balance sheet. During the first quarter of 2003, the Company repurchased 40,000 shares on the open market for $247,800. To date, we
have purchased 872,900 shares in the aggregate under this program. We will continue to evaluate our stock price relative to other investment opportunities and, to the extent that we believe that the
repurchase of our stock represents the best return of capital, we will repurchase additional shares of our stock.

We
continue to explore a wide range of options for liquidity in order for us to maintain our growth and to allow us to weather the difficult liquidity environment within the
securitization marketplace. These options may include revolving lines of credit, selling a subordinated interest in one or more of our securitizations, refinancing various securitization structures
(to the extent permitted) or issuing debt or equity. We may explore other options as well. There cannot, however, be any assurances that we will be able to obtain liquidity on satisfactory terms.
Should we not obtain additional liquidity, we will need to significantly limit our growth and will be more susceptible to the adverse liquidity conditions in the securitization marketplace.

Our
operations have generated positive cash flow thus far in 2003. To continue to generate positive cash flow during 2003, we need to either (1) successfully acquire one or more
additional positive cash flow-generating portfolios to offset the effects of reductions in managed receivables within our originated portfolio, or (2) secure, at current market
advance rates, a structurally subordinate (or

39

---

"paired")
series associated with the $441.5 million term securitization facility (see the table in the "Securitization Facilities" section below) within our Master Trust that is currently
expected to move into controlled amortization late in the third quarter of 2003. While we cannot entirely control our acquisition potential, we are cautiously optimistic about our ability to obtain,
at acceptable advance rates and terms, the paired series that we will need in 2003. Either one of these scenarios will offset the adverse effects on our cash flows of (1) the Fingerhut and CSG
early amortizations discussed above and (2) the fact that the accumulation requirement on our $627.4 million term securitization facility (see the table in the "Securitization
Facilities" section below) is greater than the funds available from the structurally subordinate series associated with that facility. We anticipate having more than adequate cash for our operations
during the year, even in the event that we are unable to acquire one or more additional positive cash flow-generating portfolios or secure the paired series discussed above. We do,
however, anticipate attempting to raise additional funds as discussed elsewhere herein.

Securitization Facilities

Our most significant source of liquidity is the securitization of credit card receivables. As of March 31, 2003, we had total securitization facilities of
$2.7 billion and had used approximately $1.8 billion of these facilities. The weighted-average borrowing rate on these facilities at March 31, 2003, was approximately 2.9%. The
maturity terms of our securitizations vary. These facilities include the outstanding amounts on two floating rate, three-year term securitizations of approximately $441.5 million
that we completed during July 2001, and approximately $627.4 million that we completed during August 2000, several one-year securitizations and, through the Fingerhut
Trust, an amortizing term securitization. Repayment for each securitization facility begins when the revolving period for the facility ends. Once repayment begins and until the facility is paid, cash
may be accumulated within the trust, and not paid to us, to provide for the repayment of such facility (i.e., the cash is no longer reinvested in new credit card receivables). This is the case with
our term securitizations, in which cash may be accumulated as early as one year prior to the scheduled maturity date. Or, as is the case with our one-year securitizations, cash may be used
to pay down the facilities beginning on the facilities' maturity date. We are only able to borrow under our securitization facilities to the extent that we have receivables that meet the eligibility
requirements of each series.

As
each facility expires or comes up for renewal, there can be no assurance that the facility will be renewed, or if renewed, there can be no assurance that the terms will be as
favorable as the terms that currently exist. Either of these events could significantly increase our need for additional liquidity. For additional information regarding our securitization practices,
see the "Off Balance Sheet Arrangements" section. When a facility expires or is not renewed, the trust continues to own the credit card receivables that we generate in the accounts designated for that
trust until the securitization structure is fully amortized. As a result, when we seek to replace a securitization facility with a facility
that is structurally subordinate to the amortizing facility, the new structurally subordinate facility will not receive any allocations of principal collections on the receivables until the
amortization of the expiring facility is complete, although the amount of debt in front of it will decline over time. This process of replacing one securitization with another structurally subordinate
facility in this manner is called a "paired" transaction, and the structurally subordinate facility is often referred to as a "paired series."

The
occurrence of adverse events may also cause the securitization transactions to amortize earlier than scheduled or may require additional enhancements. These events include a decline
in the portfolio's annualized net yield or a decline in the payment rate, in each case below set rates, or an increase in delinquencies or charge offs, in each case, above set rates. The portfolio's
annualized net yield typically includes monthly finance charges and past due fees collected on the receivables less monthly servicing fees, credit losses and cost of funds. The aforementioned events
would accelerate the need to utilize alternative funding sources. If our securitization facilities begin to trap cash flows or

40

---

otherwise
increase their required credit enhancement and we are unable to obtain additional sources of liquidity (such as other securitization facilities structurally subordinate to those facilities
that are trapping cash or are in their amortization period, other debt or additional equity), we would begin to close the credit card accounts that are open to new purchases and thus significantly
reduce our need for any additional cash.

In
the table below, we have noted our securitization facilities (including a structurally subordinate facility) and their maturation dates as of April 30, 2003:

Maturity date

Facility limit(1)(in millions)April 2003

$
75.0July 2003


300.0September 2003(2)(3)


668.6October 2003


306.0November 2003(3)


527.5March 2004


100.0April 2004(4)


292.5July 2004(5)


441.5$
2,711.0


---

41

---



Under
each of the securitization structures arranged by the Company, there has not been an early amortization period. However, the Fingerhut Trust Series 1998-2
issuance (in which the Company acquired retained interests during the third quarter of 2002) began an early amortization during March 2003 as discussed above. The Company also anticipates that,
due to an expected reduction in the principal balance of the receivables within the CSG Trust (the retained interests in which are owned by the Company's equity method investee, CSG), a principal
balance trigger will occur, and hence early amortization will begin, during the second quarter of 2003. The occurrence of this event will cause CSG to cease its cash distributions to the Company,
although we expect that the CSG Trust will continue to provide adequate compensation to the Company in cash for servicing the portfolio of receivables underlying the CSG Trust, and will continue to
make payments to the Company in respect of interest on notes held by the Company.

Critical Accounting Policies

Our financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP. These principles are numerous and complex. Our significant accounting policies are summarized in
the notes to our financial statements. In many instances, the application of GAAP requires management to make estimates or to apply subjective principles to particular facts and circumstances. A
variance in the estimates used or a variance in the application or interpretation of GAAP could yield a materially different accounting result. It is impracticable for us to summarize every accounting
principle that requires us to use judgment or estimates in its application. In our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, we discuss the two areas,
valuation of retained interests and non-consolidation of special purpose entities, where we believe that the estimations, judgments or interpretations that we have made, if different,
would have yielded the most significant differences in our financial statements, and we urge you to review that discussion. In addition, in Note 5, "Securitizations" to the financial statements
included in this report we updated our sensitivity analysis with respect to valuations.

Related Party Transactions

Under a shareholders agreement into which we entered with David G. Hanna, a trust of which David G. Hanna is the sole trustee, Frank J. Hanna, III, a trust of
which Frank J. Hanna, III is the sole trustee, Richard R. House, Jr. (our President) and Richard W. Gilbert (our Chief Operating Officer and Vice Chairman) following our initial public offering
(i) if one or more of the shareholders accepts a bona fide offer from a third party to purchase more than 50% of the outstanding common

42

---

stock,
each of the other shareholders that are a party to the agreement may elect to sell their shares to the purchaser on the same terms and conditions, and (ii) if shareholders that are a
party to the agreement owning more than 50% of the common stock propose to transfer all of their shares to a third party, then such transferring shareholders may require the other shareholders that
are a party to the agreement to sell all of the shares owned by them to the proposed transferee on the same terms and conditions.

Richard R. House, Jr. and Richard W. Gilbert each indirectly own 13.0% of VSI., the third party developer of our database management system. During the three months ended
March 31, 2003, we paid approximately $2.9 million to VSI and its subsidiaries for software development, account origination, and consulting services. During 2001, we loaned a subsidiary
of VSI $1.0 million for working capital and general corporate purposes. This loan bears interest at the prime rate and is due in January 2005; approximately $1.0 million was
outstanding as of March 31, 2003.

During
2001, we began subleasing 7,316 square feet of excess office space to Frank J. Hanna, Jr., for $21.50 per square foot. Frank J. Hanna, Jr. is the father of our Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer,
David G. Hanna, and one of our directors, Frank J. Hanna, III. The sublease rate is the same as the rate that CompuCredit pays on the prime lease. Total rent for the three months ended
March 31, 2003 for the sublease was approximately $39,000.

Forward-Looking Information

All statements in this quarterly report concerning our operating and earnings expectations for fiscal year 2003 and our liquidity expectations, and all other
statements regarding our future performance (including those using words such as "believe," "estimate," "project," "anticipate, or "predict"), are forward-looking statements. These forward-looking
statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to various assumptions, risks, and other factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those suggested by
these forward-looking statements. These factors include, among others, the following risks and others set forth under the caption "Risk Factors" in our Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2002:



43

---



We
expressly disclaim any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law.

44

---

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Interest Rate Sensitivity and Market Risk

Interest rate sensitivity is comprised of basis risk, gap risk and market risk. Basis risk is caused by the difference in the interest rate indices used to price
assets and liabilities. Gap risk is caused by the difference in repricing intervals between assets and liabilities. Market risk is the risk of loss from adverse changes in market prices and rates. Our
principal market risk is related to changes in interest rates. This affects us directly in our lending and borrowing activities, as well as indirectly as interest rates may impact the payment
performance of our customers.

We
incur basis risk because we fund managed assets at a spread over commercial paper rates or LIBOR, while the rates on the underlying managed assets are indexed to the prime rate. This
basis risk results from the potential variability in the spread between the prime rate and commercial paper rates, on the one hand, and LIBOR, on the other hand, over time. We have not hedged our
basis risk because we believe that the cost of hedging this risk is greater than the benefits we would get from elimination of this risk.

We
attempt to minimize the impact of interest rate fluctuations on net income by regularly evaluating the risk inherent within our asset and liability structure, especially our
off-balance sheet assets and liabilities such as securitized receivables. The impact of interest rate fluctuations on our securitized receivables is reflected in the valuation of our
retained interests in credit card receivables securitized. This risk arises from continuous changes in our asset and liability mix, changes in market interest rates (including such changes that are
caused by fluctuations in prevailing interest rates, payment trends on our interest-earning assets and payment requirements on our interest-bearing liabilities) and the general timing of all other
cash flows. To manage our direct risk to interest rates, management actively monitors interest rates and the interest sensitive components of our securitization structures. Management seeks to
minimize the impact of changes in interest rates on the fair value of assets, net income and cash flows primarily by matching asset and liability repricings. There can be no assurance, however, that
we will be successful in our attempts to manage such risks.

At
March 31, 2003, substantially all of our credit card receivables and other interest-earning assets had variable rate pricing, with receivables carrying annual percentage rates
at a spread over the prime rate (4.25% at March 31, 2003), subject to interest rate floors. At March 31, 2003, greater than 99% of our originated receivables were priced at their floor
rate. The floor rate is, on average, 113 basis points above the prime rate plus the spread; as such, less than 1% of our originated receivables are essentially at or above their fixed rate floor. At
March 31, 2003, our securitizations had $1.8 billion in variable rate, interest-bearing liabilities payable to investors. Should interest rates begin to rise, it is possible that, due to
this gap, our managed liabilities may begin to rise in cost prior to our managed assets rising in yield. The impact of this would depend upon how much and how quickly interest rates rose and also
would depend on our ability to reprice our receivables. Assuming that we could not successfully reprice our originated receivables or make other appropriate responsive changes in a timely enough
fashion and assuming the application of a rise in interest rates to our managed receivables balances as of March 31, 2003, each 10 basis point increase (up to the 113 basis point average
exposure set forth above) would have an approximate $1.0 million after-tax negative impact on our annual cash flows. We are in the process of evaluating certain potential actions to
mitigate this risk.

We
believe we are not exposed to any material foreign currency exchange rate risk or commodity price risk.

45

---

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES



Our
chief executive officer and our chief financial officer, after evaluating the effectiveness of our "disclosure controls and procedures" (as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 Rules 13a-14(c) and 15d-14(c)) as of a date (the "Evaluation Date") within 90 days before the filing date of this quarterly report, have concluded that as of
the Evaluation Date, our disclosure controls and procedures were adequate and designed to ensure that material information relating to us and our consolidated subsidiaries would be made known to our
chief executive officer and our chief financial officer by others within those entities.



There
were no significant changes in our internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect our internal controls and procedures subsequent to the Evaluation Date.

46

---



PART IIOTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

None.

Item 2. Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

None.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.

None.

Item 5. Other Information.

None.

Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K.

|Exhibit
Number |  | Description of Exhibit                                                                                      |  | Incorporated by reference from
CompuCredit's SEC filings unless otherwise indicated:
|-------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|31.1           |  | Certification per Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for David G. Hanna                          |  | Filed herewith                                                                      
|31.2           |  | Certification per Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for J.Paul Whitehead III                    |  | Filed herewith                                                                      
|32.1           |  | Certification per Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for David G. Hanna and J.Paul Whitehead III |  | Filed herewith                                                                      

Current
Reports on Form 8-K dated April 15, 2003 and May 5, 2003.

47

---



SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned
thereunto duly authorized.

|                 |  | CompuCredit Corporation
|---------------- |  | -----------------------
|November 3, 2003 |  | By                     

48

---

QuickLinks