24334 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 83 / Wednesday, April 30, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 

category of actions that do not 

individually or cumulatively have a 

significant effect on the human 

environment. This rule involves a 

special local regulation issued in 

conjunction with a regatta or marine 

parade. An environmental analysis 

checklist and a Categorical Exclusion 

Determination were completed for this 

event in previous years. Since this event 

has remained materially unchanged 

from the time of the prior 

determinations, a new environmental 

analysis checklist and Categorical 

Exclusion Determination were not 

completed for 2014. The previously 

completed environmental analysis 

checklist and Categorical Exclusion 

Determination can be found in docket 

folder for USCG–2013–0052 at 

www.regulations.gov. This rule is 

categorically excluded from further 

review under paragraph 34(h) of Figure 

2–1 of the Commandant Instruction. 

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100 

Marine safety, Navigation (water), 

Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Waterways. 

For the reasons discussed in the 

preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 

CFR part 100 as follows: 

PART 100—SAFETY OF LIFE ON 

NAVIGABLE WATERS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 100 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233. 

■ 2. Add a temporary § 100.T07–0110 to 

read as follows: 

§ 100.T07–0110 Special Local Regulations; 

Low Country Splash, Wando River, Cooper 

River, and Charleston Harbor, Charleston, 

SC. 

(a) Regulated Areas. The following 

regulated area is established as a special 

local regulation. All waters within a 

moving zone, beginning at Daniel Island 

Pier in approximate position 32°51′20′′ 

N, 079°54′06′′ W, South along the coast 

of Daniel Island, across the Wando River 

to Hobcaw Yacht Club, in approximate 

position 32°49′20′′ N, 079°53′49′′ W, 

South along the coast of Mt. Pleasant, 

S.C., to Charleston Harbor Resort 

Marina, in approximate position 

32°47′20′′ N, 079°54′39′′ W. There will 

be a temporary Channel Closer from 

0730 to 0815 on May 24, 2014 between 

Wando River Terminal Buoy 3 (LLNR 

3305), and Wando River Terminal Buoy 

5 (LLNR 3315). The zone will at all 

times extend 75 yards both in front of 

the lead safety vessel preceding the first 

race participants; 75 yards behind the 

safety vessel trailing the last race 

participants; and at all times extending 

100 yards on either side of participating 

race and safety vessels. Information 

regarding the identity of the lead safety 

vessel and the last safety vessel will be 

provided 2 days prior to the race via 

broadcast notice to mariners and marine 

safety information bulletins. 

(b) Definition. The term ‘‘designated 

representative’’ means Coast Guard 

Patrol Commanders, including Coast 

Guard coxswains, petty officers, and 

other officers operating Coast Guard 

vessels, and Federal, state, and local 

officers designated by or assisting the 

Captain of the Port Charleston in the 

enforcement of the regulated areas. 

(c) Regulations. (1) All persons and 

vessels are prohibited from entering, 

transiting through, anchoring in, or 

remaining within the regulated areas 

unless otherwise authorized by the 

Captain of the Port Charleston or a 

designated representative. 

(2) Persons and vessels desiring to 

enter, transit through, anchor in, or 

remain within the regulated areas may 

contact the Captain of the Port 

Charleston by telephone at 843–740– 

7050, or a designated representative via 

VHF radio on channel 16 to seek 

authorization. If authorization to enter, 

transit through, anchor in, or remain 

within the regulated areas is granted by 

the Captain of the Port Charleston or a 

designated representative, all persons 

and vessels receiving such permission 

must comply with the instructions of 

the Captain of the Port Charleston or a 

designated representative. 

(3) The Coast Guard will provide 

notice of the regulated areas through 

advanced notice via broadcast notice to 

mariners and by on-scene designated 

representatives. 

(d) Effective Date. This rule is 

effective on May 24, 2014, and will be 

enforced from 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. 

Dated: April 14, 2014. 

R.R. Rodriguez, 

Captain, U. S. Coast Guard, Captain of the 

Port Charleston. 

[FR Doc. 2014–09853 Filed 4–29–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

LIBRARY OF CONGRESS 

Copyright Office 

37 CFR Part 201 

[Docket No. 2012–1] 

Copyright Office Fees: Registration, 

Recordation, and Related Services; 

Special Services; Licensing Division 

Services; FOIA Services; Correction 

AGENCY: U.S. Copyright Office, Library 

of Congress. 

ACTION: Final rule; correction. 

SUMMARY: On March 24, 2014, the 

United States Copyright Office 

published a final rule concerning fees 

for Office services. The fee for a 

particular service did not change, but 

was inadvertently omitted from the 

schedule of fees in the final rule. The 

office hereby corrects that omission. 

DATES: Effective on May 1, 2014. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Jacqueline C. Charlesworth, General 

Counsel and Associate Register of 

Copyrights or Chris Weston, AttorneyAdvisor, Office of the General Counsel, 

at the U.S. Copyright Office, Copyright 

GC/I&R, P.O. Box 70400, Washington, 

DC 20024. Telephone: (202) 707–8350. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On March 

24, 2014, the Copyright Office published 

a final rule in the Federal Register (79 

FR 15910) replacing the current 

Copyright Office fee schedule with a 

new one to take effect on May 1, 2014. 

Among other things, this rule revised 37 

CFR 201.3(c)(9) so that the fee for 

‘‘Registration of a correction or 

amplification to a claim’’ increased from 

$100 to $130. Although the existing fee 

schedule applies the referenced fee to 

both Forms CA and DC, the fee increase 

applies only to Form CA; Form DC was 

inadvertently omitted from the 

schedule. This correction continues the 

fee for Form DC of $100, adding it to the 

new schedule as set forth in 

§ 201.3(c)(9). 

Accordingly, in the final rule FR Doc. 

2014–6293 published on March 24, 

2014 (79 FR 15910), the Office makes 

the following correction. On page 

15918, in the ‘‘Registration, recordation, 

and related services’’ table, § 201.3(c)(9) 

is corrected to read as follows: 

§ 201.3 Fees for registration, recordation, 

and related services, special services, and 

services performed by the Licensing 

Division. 

* * * * * 

(c) * * * 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES

Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 83 / Wednesday, April 30, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 24335 

1Petition of the United States Postal Service for 

the Initiation of a Proceeding to Eliminate the 

Requirement for an Alternative Format CRA Report, 

November 15, 2013, at 1 (Petition). 2Order No. 1891, Notice of Petition for the 

Initiation of a Proceeding to Eliminate the 

Alternative Format CRA Report, November 21, 2013 

(Notice). 3The Petition also requested a waiver of the 

requirement to file the FY 2013 Alternate CRA 

Report if the Commission anticipated that it might 

not be able to complete the rulemaking prior to the 

time by which preparation of the FY 2013 ACR was 

to be finalized. On December 18, 2013, the 

Commission granted the waiver request in order to 

fully evaluate amendment of Rule 3050.14 and any 

comments of interested persons. Order No. 1913, 

Order Granting Waiver of Filing FY 2013 Alternate 

CRA, December 18, 2013. 

4 Initial Comments of the Public Representative, 

January 7, 2014 (PR Comments). The order 

establishing this rulemaking provided for comments 

by interested parties no later than January 9, 2014 

and reply comments no later than January 23, 2014. 

Notice at 4. No reply comments were filed. 

Registration, recordation and related 

services 

Fees 

($) 

* * * * * 

(9) Registration of a correction or amplification to a claim. 

(Form CA) ....................................... $130 

(Form DC) ....................................... 100 

* * * * * 

* * * * * 

Dated: April 21, 2014. 

Maria A. Pallante, 

Register of Copyrights. 

Approved By: 

James H. Billington, 

Librarian of Congress. 

[FR Doc. 2014–09822 Filed 4–29–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 1410–30–P 

POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION 

39 CFR Part 3050 

[Docket No. RM2014–2; Order No. 2061] 

Periodic Reporting 

AGENCY: Postal Regulatory Commission. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Commission is 

eliminating a requirement that the 

Postal Service prepare the annual cost 

and revenue analysis report in an 

alternative format. The reason for the 

change is that the alternative format’s 

usefulness as an analytical tool has been 

overtaken by developments since 

passage of postal reform legislation in 

2006. Adoption of this change means 

the Postal Service will prepare and 

submit only one version of this report. 

DATES: Effective May 30, 2014. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

David A. Trissell, General Counsel, at 

202–789–6820. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Regulatory History 

73 FR 53324, September 15, 2008 

74 FR 20834 May 5, 2009 

78 FR 70904 November 27, 2013 

Table of Contents 

I. Introduction 

II. Proposal 

III. Ordering Paragraphs 

I. Introduction 

On November 21, 2013, the 

Commission established this rulemaking 

docket to evaluate the Postal Service’s 

petition 1 to eliminate that part of 39 

CFR 3050.14 requiring the production 

and submission of an Alternate CRA 

(Cost and Revenue Analysis Report) as 

part of the Postal Service’s Annual 

Compliance Report (ACR).2

Rule 3050.14 establishes the format 

for the CRA which reports costs, 

revenues, volumes, contribution, and 

other information reflecting the 

classification structure in the Mail 

Classification Schedule (MCS). 39 CFR 

3050.14. The rule also requires an 

alternative, more disaggregated format 

(Alternate CRA) capable of reflecting the 

classification structure in effect prior to 

the adoption of the Postal 

Accountability and Enhancement Act 

(PAEA). Id. The Postal Service proposes 

striking the second sentence of rule 

3050.14. 

This order grants the Petition and, 

accordingly, amends rule 3050.14.3

II. Proposal 

A. Postal Service Proposal 

In support of its proposal, the Postal 

Service states that since passage of the 

PAEA, mail classifications have been 

combined and data systems no longer 

gather data for many of the Alternate 

CRA categories. Current data systems 

cannot always track data by the prePAEA categories, particularly cost data 

for many categories in the Alternate 

CRA. For example, the current 

methodology does not separate FirstClass Package Service into Single-Piece 

and Presort parcels. Revenue, Pieces, 

and Weight (RPW) volumes are used 

and unit costs are assumed to be 

identical, which is not intuitive and not 

supported by actual data. Petition at 3. 

According to the Postal Service, 

methods to estimate the data for the 

Alternate CRA were developed by 

disaggregating existing mail categories 

in order to reassemble the pre-PAEA 

classification results in estimation 

methodologies that vary by category. Id. 

As a result, the aggregation of cost data 

may not always match those developed 

via different estimation techniques, and 

data for some categories may not exist 

at all. Id. at 3–4. 

The Postal Service further states that 

public and non-public versions of the 

Alternate CRA were filed initially, but 

as more parts of products have shifted 

to competitive products, of necessity 

only a non-public version has been 

filed. Id. at 2. Otherwise, a comparison 

of the market dominant information in 

the CRA with that in the Alternate CRA 

would make it possible to derive 

information about competitive products. 

For instance, the revenue, costs, and 

volume of First-Class Package Service 

and Lightweight Parcel Select in the 

Alternate CRA could be discerned when 

returned to and combined with existing 

data for First-Class Mail and Standard 

Mail. Also, the Alternate CRA has 

separate lines for negotiated service 

agreements (NSAs) that isolate the NSA 

data for First-Class Package Service. Id. 

The Postal Service points out that the 

Alternate CRA provided a bridge for 

maintaining trend data through the 

transition so that no pre-PAEA 

categories were omitted and the 

integrity of the data reporting was 

maintained. Id. at 4. The Postal Service 

asserts that usefulness of the Alternate 

CRA is questionable because the 

information reported is the result of 

ratio analysis and guesstimates. Id. The 

Postal Service argues that the report is 

no longer relevant. Id. 

The Postal Service also claims that the 

burden to produce the Alternate CRA is 

substantial and dependent on 

completion of all other ACR work. Id. at 

4–5. The Postal Service is concerned 

that the relatively weak quality of the 

Alternate CRA material may reflect 

upon the quality of other ACR material. 

Id. at 5. 

B. Public Representative Comments 

Only the Public Representative filed 

comments.4 The Public Representative 

points out that the CRA involves 

separating the Postal Service’s accrued 

costs reported in its general ledger into 

cost segments which are further 

segregated into cost pools and 

distributed to products based on factors 

derived from data collection systems. 

PR Comments at 2–3. The Public 

Representative asserts that the 

Commission has noted the Alternate 

CRA format provided a helpful 

reference point as product lists were 

frequently refined in the first few years 

after passage of the PAEA. Id. at 3. As 

products are combined or morphed into 

new products, the link between 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES