alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

ONE HUNDRED FIRST CONGRESS 

Convened January 3, 1989 

FIRST SESSION { 

SECOND SESSION { 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Wednesday, October 25, 1989 

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF WALTER J.STEWART, 

SECRETARY OF THE SENATE 

By Gerald A. Hackett, Executive Clerk 
RESOLUTION OVER, UNDER THE RULE 

S. Exec. Res. 166--To discharge the Committee on the Judiciary of further consideration 

of the nommat10n of Wilham Lucas to be an Assistant Attorney General. Submitted August 

3, 1989, by Mr. Dole. 
1 

NOMINATIONS 

Calendar Message Nominee, Office, And Predecessor Reported No. No. Bv 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

* 326 467 Brian W. Clymer, of Pennsylvania, to be Sep 12, 89 Mr. Riegle, 

Urban Mass Transportation Administrator, Committee on Banking, vice Alfred A. DelliBovi, resigned. Housing, and Urban Affairs, 

without pnnted report. 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

* 376 656 Dennis B. Underwood, of California, to be Oct 4, 89 Mr. Johnston, 

Commissioner of Reclamation, vice C. Dale Committee on Energy and 

Duvall, resigned. Natural Resources, without 

printed report. 

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD 

* 385 359 Jerry M. Hunter, of Missouri, to be General Oct 4, 89 Mr. Kennedy, 

Counsel of the National Labor Relations Committee on Labor and 

Board for a term of four years, vice Human Resources, without 

Rosemary M. Collyer, term expired. printed report 

* 386 576 Clifford R. Oviatt, Jr., of Virginia, to be Do. 

a Member of the National Labor Relations 

Board for the remainder of the term 

expiring August 27, 1993, vice Wilford W. 

Johansen, resigned. 

* 387 577 Donald F. Rodgers, of Maryland, to be a Do. 

Member of the National Labor Relations 

Board for the remainder of the term 

expiring December 16, 1992, vice John E. 

Higgins, Jr. 
2 

Calendar Message Nominee, Office, And Predecessor Reported 

No. No. Bv 

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD 

-- Con. 

* 388 731 Dennis M. Devaney, of Maryland, to be a Oct 4, 89 Mr. Kennedy, 

Member of the National Labor Relations Committee on Labor and 

Board for the remainder of the term Human Resources, without 

expiring December 16, 1989, vice Marshall printed report. 

B. Babson, resigned, to which position he 

was appointed during the recess of the 

Senate from October 22, 1988, to January 

3, 1989. 

* 389 771 Dennis M. Devaney, of Maryland, to be a Do. 

Member of the National Labor Relations 

Board for the term of five years expiring 

December 16, 1994. (Reappointment) 

ACTION AGENCY 

* 390 513 Jane A. Kenny, of Virginia, to be Director Do. 

of the ACTION Agency, vice Donna M. 

Alvarado, resigned. 

[NEW REPORTS] 

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

* 449 331 James E. Cason, of Virginia, to be an Oct 24, 89 Mr. Leahy, Assistant Secretary of Agriculture, vice Committee on Agriculture, George S. Dunlop, resigned. Nutrition, and Forestry, 

.. without printed reoort. I *S1gmf1es nominees commitment to respond to requests to appear and testify before any duly constituted committee of the Senate.
#### § 13.26 Decisions.

The adjudicative officer shall issue an initial decision on the application as promptly as possible after the filing of the last document or conclusion of the hearing. The decision must include written findings and conclusions on the applicant's eligibility and status as a prevailing party, including a finding on the net worth of the applicant. Where the adjudicative officer has determined under § 13.11(b) that the applicant's net worth information is exempted from disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act, the finding on net worth shall be kept confidential. The decision shall also include, if at issue, findings on whether the agency's position was substantially justified, whether the applicant unduly protracted the proceedings, an explanation of any difference between the amount requested and the amount awarded, and whether any special circumstances make the award unjust.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1303

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1303 appear at 89 FR 67816, Aug. 21, 2024.

#### § 1303.11 Limitations and prohibitions.

An agency must adhere to sections 644(e), 644(g)(3), 653, 654, 655, 656, and 657A of the Act. These sections pertain to union organizing, the Davis-Bacon Act, limitations on compensation, nondiscrimination, unlawful activities, political activities, and obtaining parental consent.
§ 902.55 Intragovernmental exchanges. ( a ) Any record prepared by a Government officer or employee (including those prepared by a consultant or advisory body) for internal Government use is within the statutory exemption to the extent that it contains— ( 1 ) Opinions, advice, deliberations, or recommendations made in the course of developing official action by the Government, but not actually made a part of that official action, or
( 2 ) Information concerning any pending proceeding or similar matter including any claim or other dispute to be resolved before a court of law, administrative board, hearing officer, or contracting officer.
( b ) This section has two distinct purposes. One is to protect the full and frank exchange of ideas, views, and opinions necessary for the effective functioning of the Government and to afford this protection both before and after any action is taken. This judicially recognized privilege of protection against disclosure in litigation or elsewhere is intended to assure that these resources will be fully and readily available to those officials upon whom the responsibility rests to take official and final Corporation action. However, the action itself, any memoranda made part of that action, and the facts on which it is based are not within this protection. The other purpose is to protect against the premature disclosure of material that is in the development stage if premature disclosure would be detrimental to the authorized and appropriate purposes for which the material is being used, or if, because of its tentative nature, the material is likely to be revised or modified before it is officially presented to the public.
( c ) Examples of records covered by this section include minutes to the extent they contain matter described in paragraph (a) of this section; staff papers containing advice, opinions, suggestions, or exchanges of views, preliminary to final agency decision or action; budgetary planning and programming information; advance information on such things as proposed plans to procure, lease, or otherwise hire and dispose of materials, real estate, or facilities, documents exchanged preparatory to anticipated legal proceedings; material intended for public release at a specified future time, if premature disclosure would be detrimental to orderly processes of the Corporation; records of inspection, investigations, and surveys pertaining to internal management of the Department; and matters that would not be routinely disclosed under disclosure procedures in litigation and which are likely to be the subject of litigation. However, if such a record also contains factual information, that information must be made available under subpart E of this part unless the facts are so inextricably intertwined with deliverative or policymaking processes, that they cannot be separated without disclosing those processes.
§ 144.206 Reporting requirements. ( a ) *General requirement.* Any insurer that sells a qualified long-term care insurance policy under a qualified State long-term care insurance partnership must submit, in accordance with the requirements of this section, data on insured individuals, policyholders, and claimants who have active partnership qualified policies or certificates for a reporting period.
( b ) *Specific requirements.* Insurers of qualified long-term care insurance policies must submit the following data to the Secretary by the deadlines specified in paragraph (c) of this section: ( 1 ) *Registry of active individual and group partnership qualified policies or certificates.* ( i ) Insurers must submit data on— ( A ) Any insured individual who held an active partnership qualified policy or certificate at any point during a reporting period, even if the policy or certificate was subsequently cancelled, lost partnership qualified status, or otherwise terminated during the reporting period; and
( B ) All active group long-term care partnership qualified insurance policies, even if the identity of the individual policy/certificate holder is unavailable.
( ii ) The data required under paragraph (b)(1)(i) of this section must cover a 6-month reporting period of January through June 30 or July 1 through December 31 of each year; and
( iii ) The data must include, but are not limited to— ( A ) Current identifying information on the insured individual;
( B ) The name of the insurance company and issuing State;
( C ) The effective date and terms of coverage under the policy.
( D ) The annual premium.
( E ) The coverage period.
( F ) Other information, as specified by the Secretary in “State Long-Term Care Partnership Insurer Reporting Requirements.”
( 2 ) *Claims paid under partnership qualified policies or certificates.* Insurers must submit data on all partnership qualified policies or certificates for which the insurer paid at least one claim during the reporting period. This includes data for employer-paid core plans and buy-up plans without individual insured data. The data must— ( i ) Cover a quarterly reporting period of 3 months;
( ii ) Include, but are not limited to— ( A ) Current identifying information on the insured individual;
( B ) The type and cash amount of the benefits paid during the reporting period and lifetime to date;
( C ) Remaining lifetime benefits;
( D ) Other information, as specified by the Secretary in “State Long-Term Care Partnership Insurer Reporting Requirements.”
§ 13.480 Subsistence hunting and trapping. ( a ) Local rural residents may hunt and trap wildlife for subsistence uses in park areas where subsistence uses are allowed in compliance with this chapter and 50 CFR part 100.
( b ) ( 1 ) The following types of bait may be used to take bears for subsistence uses: ( i ) Parts of legally taken native fish or wildlife that are not required to be salvaged; or
( ii ) Remains of native fish or wildlife that died of natural causes.
( 2 ) The use of any other type of bait to take bears for subsistence uses is prohibited except under the terms and conditions of a permit issued under paragraph (d) of § 13.1902.
[80 FR 64344, Oct. 23, 2015, as amended at 82 FR 3633, Jan. 12, 2017]
Martin, Michael (OST) 

^ ;;'--Ani:v:cNIUh. 

From: perdital3 [perdita13@peoplepc.com] ^ isPOhl'^nON 

Sent: Monday, February 06, 2012 11:11 AM '^^ nPiipfiTlh'.!-' 

To: EAS(OST) ' ^ ' " " 

Subject: Airline Fliglits to Presque Isle 

mi nJ} 'U P 12- US 

Hello, 

I just wanted to make some comments on keeping airline flights coming up here to Northern 

Maine. I think it is very important up here. Otherwisej we are 3 hours drivetime from the 

nearest airport (Bangor). We (my family and I) have tried everything to get back and forth, 

either on business or to Baltimore to visit my family. We have driven (it takes 20 hours to 

get to my family's home), taken the bus to Portland (6 hours and limited schedule), driven to 

Portland (5 hours, then having to leave the car), Bangor - 3 hours (and having to leave the 

car) (and then not being able to get where I wanted to go, enduring flight cancellations, 

delays and spending the night in NYC, plus dangerous driving conditions on Rt 95 when I 

returned home!!)We've also driven or taken the train to Boston. The easiest way is to fly 

FROM PQI, and what we ALL do now. It's not cheap, and not easy. There are no US AIRWAYS 

flights from Boston to Baltimore. It's very expensive to change airlines (we paid $1000 for 

a rt ticket for my niece to attend my father's funeral). Plus you have to change terminals 

Boston, and go through security a second time, which takes a long time. So, we have learned 

to just use US AIRWAYS and endure the 2/3 stops you have to make. It is a full day's 

journey, believe me!! 

But, as I said, it's easier than any other way. I also know lots of people up here who do 

fly, (and many more who would, if it was more economical). At any rate, I feel that it is 

VERY IMPORTANT for us to have airline service up here. We would be even more isolated than 

we already are if we didn't. I think it would damage our area economically. 

I did look at the proposals. FOR ME PERSONALLY, I actually preferred AirChoice One with 

it's connection to Portland. To me, that makes much more sense than going to Boston. There 

are many options from Portland Detport that are much more economical than in Boston, plus, 

being a smaller airport, Portland is very easy to get around in, and to change airlines 

wouldn't be so much of a problem. PLUS, I know I would travel downstate MORE if I could fly 

there, to enjoy some of the cultural attractions and other things that I just don't care to 

spend 10+ hours in the car to go to. The proposed average fare is reasonable for that. It 

would open up the rest of the State to us, way up here in the North!!! 

Of the two for PQI to Boston, the last was more appealing to me, but I don't know all the 

other things you are looking at in this. 

Thank you for letting me express my opinion on this, 

Kathleen Braeuninger 

30 High Street 

Fort Fairfield, ME 04742 

207-472-3185 

PeoplePC Online 

A better way to Internet 

http://www.peoplepc.com
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

TONY LAROY JOHNSON, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D16-5312 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________) Opinion filed June 29, 2018. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lee County; Lisa S. Porter, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Victoria E. Hatfield, Special Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Johnny T. Salgado, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
VILLANTI, KHOUZAM, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
Date of 

report 

1967 

July 24 

NINETIETH CONGRESS 

FIRST SESSION-Began January 10, 1967 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

P1epa1'ed undet the dn ectton of FRANCIS R VALEO, Secretary of the Senate 

B; GERALD A. HACKETT, Executive Clerk 

Tuesday, July 25, 1967 

NOMINATION 

Calendar Message Name of nommee Office Predecessor 

No No 

NATIONAL MEDIATION 

BOARD 

940 27,) Lc \ crdt :Cdwards, of A member of the N ,,honal Reappomtment 

Oklahoma lVIedt.1t10n Bo,1rd for the 

I 

trrm expmng July 1, 

llJ70 

85-022-67-No 69 

U S GOVERNMENT PRINTtNG OFFICi IU7
#### McGrath v. New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, appellant.

*Negligence—flagman at railway crossing—Excessive damages—Evidence.*

In an action against a railroad company to recover damages for an injury caused by negligence, evidence that there was usually a flagman at the crossing where the injury occurred, but that there was none there at the time of the injury, is competent as bearing on the question whether the plaintiff was chargeable with negligence.

A verdict for $3,000 damages in such an action *held*not to be so great as to impute passion, prejudice, partiality or improper influence.

This case has been twice tried. On the first trial the plaintiff recovered a verdict. On appeal from the judgment entered thereon, the general term granted a new trial (see S. O., 1 N. Y. Sup. 243). On the sécond trial the plaintiff recovered a verdict for $2,000 damages. Exceptions were taken on the trial by the defendant, which were ordered to be heard at a general term. A motion was made for a new trial, on the ground that the verdict was excessive and against evidence, which was denied, and the defendant appealed from the order.

*777
      *Matthew Hale,*for appellant.

*Amasa J. Parker,*for respondent.

Memorandum by the court. — The court held that the questions presented were substantially the same as on the former appeal, and that the decision at that time (see 1 N. Y. Sup. 243) must control.

*Order affirmed and judgment for plaintiff.*
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20463

 

 March 27, 2023

MEMORANDUM

TO: Patricia C. Orrock

 Chief Compliance Officer

 Dayna C. Brown

 Assistant Staff Director

 Audit Division

FROM: Neven F. Stipanovic

 Associate General Counsel

Policy Division

 Jessica Selinkoff

 Assistant General Counsel

 Compliance Advice

 Joshua Blume

 Attorney

 

SUBJECT: Draft Final Audit Report on Steve Daines for Montana (LRA 1146) 

The Office of the General Counsel has reviewed the proposed Draft Final Audit Report 

(“DFAR”) on Steve Daines for Montana. The DFAR contains three findings: Receipt of 

Contributions in Excess of the Limit (Finding 1), Disclosure of Debts and Obligations (Finding 

2), and Disclosure of Receipts (Finding 3). We concur with the findings. If you have any 

questions, please contact Joshua Blume, the attorney assigned to this audit.
This table was generated on 8/31/23.

Rank ID # Committee Amount

1 C00110338 AMERICAN CRYSTAL SUGAR COMPANY POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $1,196,404

2 C00326389 AMALGAMATED SUGAR COMPANY POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $306,000

3 C00166348 SOUTHERN MINNESOTA BEET SUGAR COOPERATIVE POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $207,025

4 C00164939 MINN-DAK FARMERS COOPERATIVE SUGAR PAC (MDSPAC) $179,062

5 C00349746 CALIFORNIA DAIRIES, INC. FEDERAL POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $162,900

6 C00001388 DAIRY FARMERS OF AMERICA, INC. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE; AKA DFA-PAC $83,523

7 C00080135 BLUE DIAMOND GROWERS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $70,962

8 C00040881 OHIO ACTION COMMITTEE FOR RURAL ELECTRIFICATION (ACRE)/OHIO RURAL ELECTRIC COO $51,795 

9 C00146605 FARMERS' RICE COOPERATIVE FUND $35,450

10 C00254656 SUGAR CANE GROWERS COOPERATIVE OF FLORIDA (PAC) $27,500

11 C00114702 OCEAN SPRAY CRANBERRIES INC. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $21,140

12 C00220053 RICELAND FOODS, INC. PAC $19,650

13 C00330696 ASSOCIATED MILK PRODUCERS INC. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $12,156

14 C00359984 SOUTHEAST MILK INC POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $12,000

15 C00133561 OKLAHOMA ASSOCIATION OF ELECTRIC COOPERATIVES-ACRE $11,500

16 C00085019 ARIZONA DAIRYMEN POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (ADPAC) $11,000

17 C00099002 SUNKIST GROWERS, INC. PAC - FEDERAL $8,300

18 C00627992 CALIFORNIA ALMOND INDUSTRY PAC FEDERAL, SPONSORED BY THE ALMOND ALLIANCE OF C $8,289

19 C00022756 DARIGOLD POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE FKA NORTH PACIFIC DAIRY $7,629

20 C00185686 SOUTH TEXAS SUGAR CANE PRODUCERS PAC RIO GRANDE VALLEY SUGAR GROWERS, INC $7,063

21 C00352674 GREAT RIVER ENERGY ACTION TEAM (GREAT) $5,850

22 C00220269 BASIN ELECTRIC POWER COOPERATIVE POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (BASIN ELECTRIC PA $5,650

23 C00103978 INDIANA ACRE/INDIANA STATEWIDE ASSOCIATION OF RURAL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVES DBA $5,000 

24 C00152272 PLAINS COTTON COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION EMPLOYEES' POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $5,000

25 C00414169 BERKELEY ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC. EMPLOYEE PAC $3,814

26 C00096594 MICHIGAN MILK PRODUCERS ASSOCIATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $3,500

27 C00220558 ORRICK HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE, LLP FEDERAL PAC $3,348

28 C00141242 AGRI-MARK INC POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $2,003

29 C00363069 MARYLAND & VIRGINIA MILK PRODUCERS COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION INC POLITICAL ACTION $2,000

30 C00133215 NATIONAL GRAPE COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION INC WELCH FOODS INC POLITICAL ACTION CO $1,500

31 C00207308 AG PROCESSING INC POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE, AGPAC $1,215

32 C00508309 INDEPENDENT PHARMACY COOPERATIVE PAC ('IPC PAC') $557

33 C00395244 LANDUS COOPERATIVE POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $500

34 C00008169 ACTION COMMITTEE FOR RURAL ELECTRIFICATION/MISSOURI COOPERATIVES (FKA MISSOUR $246

35 C00435909 UNIGROUP INC. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $12

36 C00009423 LAND O'LAKES, INC., PAC $2

*Only 36 Cooperative PACs have reported disbursements.

Top 50* Cooperative PACs by Disbursements

January 1 - June 30, 2023

PAC Table 10b
§ 150.447 The record. ( a ) Any testimony that is taken in-person by telephone, or by video teleconference is recorded and transcribed. The ALJ may order that other proceedings in a case, such as a prehearing conference or oral argument of a motion, be recorded and transcribed.
( b ) The transcript of any testimony, exhibits and other evidence that is admitted, and all pleadings and other documents that are filed in the case constitute the record for purposes of an ALJ decision.
( c ) For good cause, the ALJ may order appropriate redactions made to the record.
[64 FR 45795, Aug. 20, 1999, as amended at 86 FR 24286, May 5, 2021]
BILLING CODE: 6715-01-M

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 2, 2023 AT 10:30 A.M.

PLACE: HYBRID MEETING: 1050 FIRST STREET, N.E. WASHINGTON, D.C. (12TH

FLOOR) AND VIRTUAL. 

NOTE: FOR THOSE ATTENDING THE MEETING IN PERSON, CURRENT COVID-19 

SAFETY PROTOCOLS FOR VISITORS, WHICH ARE BASED ON THE CDC COVID-19 

HOSPITAL ADMISSION LEVEL IN WASHINGTON, D.C., WILL BE UPDATED ON THE 

COMMISSION’S CONTACT PAGE BY THE MONDAY BEFORE THE MEETING. SEE 

THE CONTACT PAGE AT https://www.fec.gov/contact/. IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO 

VIRTUALLY ACCESS THE MEETING, SEE THE INSTRUCTIONS BELOW.

STATUS: THIS MEETING WILL BE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC, SUBJECT TO THE 

ABOVE-REFERENCED GUIDANCE REGARDING THE COVID-19 HOSPITAL 

ADMISSION LEVEL AND CORRESPONDING HEALTH AND SAFETY PROCEDURES.

TO ACCESS THE MEETING VIRTUALLY, GO TO THE COMMISSION’S WEBSITE 

www.fec.gov AND CLICK ON THE BANNER TO BE TAKEN TO THE MEETING PAGE.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Proposed Directive Regarding Investigations Conducted by the Office of 

General Counsel 

Proposed Final Audit Report on Steve Daines for Montana (A21-04)

Draft Advisory Opinion 2023-06: Texas Majority PAC

Management and Administrative Matters

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Judith Ingram, Press Officer

Telephone: (202) 694-1220

Individuals who plan to attend in person and who require special assistance, such as 

sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should contact Laura 

E. Sinram, Secretary and Clerk, at (202) 694-1040 or secretary@fec.gov, at least 72 

hours prior to the meeting date.

(Authority: Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b)

Laura E. Sinram

Secretary and Clerk of the Commission

Submitted: October 25, 2023
**EXHIBIT 32.02**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT AND CHIEFFINANCIAL OFFICER**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Entercom CommunicationsCorp. (the “Company”) hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

 

(i)   the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qof the Company for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010 (the “Report”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d),as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(ii)   the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

Date: May 7,2010

 

 
| By:    | /s/  Stephen F. Fisher                                             |   |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Name:  | Stephen  F. Fisher                                                 |   |
| Title: | Executive  Vice President - Operations and Chief Financial Officer |   |
|   | (principal financial officer)                                      |   |

 

*A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided to Entercom Communications Corp.and will be retained by Entercom Communications Corp. and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.*

 

----