alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
BILLING CODE: 6715-01-M

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 14, 2023 AT 10:30 A.M.

PLACE: HYBRID MEETING: 1050 FIRST STREET, N.E. WASHINGTON, D.C. (12TH

FLOOR) AND VIRTUAL. 

NOTE: FOR THOSE ATTENDING THE MEETING IN PERSON, CURRENT COVID-19 

SAFETY PROTOCOLS FOR VISITORS, WHICH ARE BASED ON THE CDC COVID-19 

HOSPITAL ADMISSION LEVEL IN WASHINGTON, D.C., WILL BE UPDATED ON THE 

COMMISSION’S CONTACT PAGE BY THE MONDAY BEFORE THE MEETING. SEE 

THE CONTACT PAGE AT https://www.fec.gov/contact/. IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO 

VIRTUALLY ACCESS THE MEETING, SEE THE INSTRUCTIONS BELOW.

STATUS: THIS MEETING WILL BE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC, SUBJECT TO THE 

ABOVE-REFERENCED GUIDANCE REGARDING THE COVID-19 HOSPITAL 

ADMISSION LEVEL AND CORRESPONDING HEALTH AND SAFETY PROCEDURES.

TO ACCESS THE MEETING VIRTUALLY, GO TO THE COMMISSION’S WEBSITE 

www.fec.gov AND CLICK ON THE BANNER TO BE TAKEN TO THE MEETING PAGE.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Proposed Directive Regarding Investigations Conducted by the Office of 

General Counsel 

Audit Division Recommendation Memorandum on Citizens for Waters 

(A21-01)

Management and Administrative Matters

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Judith Ingram, Press Officer

Telephone: (202) 694-1220

Individuals who plan to attend in person and who require special assistance, such as 

sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should contact Laura 

E. Sinram, Secretary and Clerk, at (202) 694-1040 or secretary@fec.gov, at least 72 

hours prior to the meeting date.

(Authority: Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b)

Vicktoria J. Allen

Deputy Secretary of the Commission

Submitted: September 7, 2023
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. § 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§ 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Private Media Group, Inc. (the
Company) for the quarterly period ending September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Berth Milton, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and
Johan Gillborg, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his
knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|                       
|/s/ Berth Milton       
|Berth Milton           
|Chief Executive Officer
|                       
|November 9, 2007       
|                       
|/s/ Johan Gillborg     
|Johan Gillborg         
|Chief Financial Officer

November 9, 2007

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999             JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                             212                       0
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,656                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                      2,712                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,371                       0
<PP&E>                                           1,198                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  14,149                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,519                       0
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             7                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,623                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    14,149                       0
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,355                   3,455
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,896                   3,127
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    66                      39
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 123                     119
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    270                     170
<INCOME-TAX>                                       108                      73
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                162                      97
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                       162                      97
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.28                    0.18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.28                    0.18
        

</TABLE>
#### Village of St. Edward, appellee, v. Boone County, appellant.

Filed October 17, 1913.

No. 17,221.

Appeal from the district court for Boone county: James R. Hanna, Judge.

*Affirmed.*

*Jesse L.*Root, O. *M. Needham,*TV. *J. Donahue*and *Albert & Wagner,*for appellant.

*F. J. Alacio, contra.*

Fawcett, J.

The pleadings and the evidence in this case, and the law applicable thereto are in all respects the same as those in *City of Albion v. Boone County, ante,*p. 494, except only as' to the amount of the plaintiff’s claim and the amount of the judgment entered thereon.

For the reasons stated in the opinion in that case, the judgment of the district court is

Affirmed.

Letton, Rose and Sedgwick, JJ., not sitting.
# PAC Table 13c

&"Arial,Bold"&10&KFF0000This table was generated on 9/7/23.
#### § 910.56 Coordinated planning area.

*Coordinated planning area* means a Square, portion of a Square, or group of Squares that is composed of one or more *development parcels* and is treated as a unit under *Square Guidelines* in order to achieve comprehensive planning and design.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   Exhibit 10.11

                                  ADDENDUM #1
                                       TO
                         EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
                                    BETWEEN
                             WAREFORCE INCORPORATED
                                      AND
                                 ORIE RECHTMAN

THIS Addendum amends and revises that certain Employment Agreement by and
between Wareforce Incorporated and Orie Rechtman dated June 1, 1998 as follows:

Amend Section 1 by deleting "six (6) months" and replacing it with "four (4)
months".

Agreed to this 28th day of November 2000.

WAREFORCE INCORPORATED                  ORIE RECHTMAN


By: DAN RICKETTS                        /s/ ORIE RECHTMAN
   ------------------------             ------------------------
    Dan Ricketts
    General Counsel
#### § 292.25 Information requirements.

The information required by § 292.24 of this subpart in order for a landowner to obtain a determination of compliance constitutes an information requirement as defined in the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3507) and has been approved for use by the Office of Management and Budget and assigned control number 0596-0135.
----

----

**EXHIBIT        32.1**

**CERTIFICATION        PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| (1)          |  The                  Report fully                  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the                  Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                  and |
|-----------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)          | The                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the                  Company. |
|-----------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| November                  14, 2007 | /s/                  Paul                  Roszel                                |
|------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                               | Paul                  Roszel                                                                                                                                                                                                                |
|                               | President,                  Chief Executive Officer                                                                                                                                                                                         |

----
§ 1160.4 Eligibility for international exhibitions. An indemnity agreement for an international exhibition made under these regulations shall cover: ( a ) Eligible items from outside the United States while on exhibition in the United States;
( b ) Eligible items from the United States while on exhibition outside this country, preferably when they are part of an exchange of exhibitions; and
( c ) Eligible items from the United States while on exhibition in the United States, in connection with other eligible items from outside the United States which are integral to the exhibition as a whole.
( d ) ( 1 ) *Example.* An American art museum is organizing a retrospective exhibition which will include more than 150 works of art by Impressionist painter Auguste Renoir. Museums in Paris and London have agreed to lend 125 works of art, covering every aspect of his career, many of which have not been seen together since the artist's death in 1919. The organizer is planning to include 25 masterpieces by Renoir from American public and private collections. The show will open in Chicago and travel to San Francisco and Washington.
( 2 ) *Discussion.* This example is a common application for coverage of both foreign- and domestic-owned objects in an international exhibition. The foreign-owned objects are eligible for indemnity coverage under paragraph (a) of this section, and the domestic-owned objects may be eligible for indemnity coverage under paragraph (c) of this section if the foreign-owned objects are integral to the purposes of the exhibition as a whole. In reviewing this application, the Federal Council would evaluate the exhibition as a whole and determine whether the loans of 125 foreign-owned objects are integral to the educational, cultural, historical, or scientific significance of the exhibition on Renoir. It would also be necessary for the U.S. Department of State to determine whether or not the exhibition was in the national interest.
[73 FR 21056, Apr. 18, 2008]
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 210 (Tuesday, October 31, 2006)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 64109]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9021]




                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 210 / Tuesday, October 31, 2006 / 
Presidential Documents

[[Page 64109]]


                Notice of October 27, 2006

                
Continuation of National Emergency Regarding the 
                Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction

                On November 14, 1994, by Executive Order 12938, the 
                President declared a national emergency with respect to 
                the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national 
                security, foreign policy, and economy of the United 
                States posed by the proliferation of nuclear, 
                biological, and chemical weapons (weapons of mass 
                destruction) and the means of delivering such weapons. 
                On July 28, 1998, the President issued Executive Order 
                13094 amending Executive Order 12938 to respond more 
                effectively to the worldwide threat of weapons of mass 
                destruction proliferation activities. On June 28, 2005, 
                I issued Executive Order 13382 that, inter alia, 
                further amended Executive Order 12938 to improve our 
                ability to combat proliferation. Because the 
                proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and the 
                means of delivering them continues to pose an unusual 
                and extraordinary threat to the national security, 
                foreign policy, and economy of the United States, the 
                national emergency first declared on November 14, 1994, 
                must continue in effect beyond November 14, 2006. In 
                accordance with section 202(d) of the National 
                Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing 
                for 1 year the national emergency declared in Executive 
                Order 12938, as amended.

                This notice shall be published in the Federal Register 
                and transmitted to the Congress.
                <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    October 27, 2006.

[FR Doc. 06-9021
Filed 10-30-06; 12:12 pm]
Billing code 3195-01-P
#### Joseph A. MAYO and Ruth S. Mayo v. McCLOSKEY & CO., McCloskey & Co. of Florida and McCloskey Homes, Inc.

Civ. A. No. 24395.

United States District Court E. D. Pennsylvania, at Philadelphia.

Sept. 3, 1958.

William R. Hudson, Richard W. Hopkins, White, Williams & Scott, Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiffs.

J. Dress Pannell and Lawrence D. Biele, Philadelphia, Pa., for defendants.

LEAHY, District Judge.

Defendants challenge the complaint by (1) a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim; (2) a motion to strike, and (3) a motion for a more definite statement. The complaint has two counts: (1) breach of contract to construct a house and (2) misrepresentation of the condition of the house at the time of settlement. The theories behind defendants’ motions are that neither count states a cause of action and the counts are improperly joined; damages are not itemized; fraud and deceit are alleged generally and not with particularity; the identity of the corporate agents is *242not alleged and their authority is not alleged with particularity.

 1. Count 1 alleges a contract and a breach with resultant damages. Such allegations are traditional. Lehrer v. McCloskey Homes, Inc., 3 Cir., 245 F.2d 11. Count 2 alleges defendants knowingly misrepresented facts to plaintiffs in an effort to induce them to act which plaintiffs did to their damage. These are adequate elements for an action in deceit. Lehrer v. McCloskey Homes, Inc., supra. The objection of improper joinder of the two counts is without merit in view of the express provisions of Rule 18 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C. The motion to dismiss lacks merit.

2. Paragraphs 7 and 11 of the complaint contain the averments of a principal-agency relationship against defendant McCloskey & Co. and the other two defendants. Such allegations are material and pertinent. See, Restatement, Agency §§ 140-41. Paragraphs 21 and 22, as well as paragraphs 14, 15 and 16 and 17 which are said to be immaterial, are factual allegations of the misrepresentations pleaded in Count 2, together with the allegations of damages. Thus, the motion to strike will be denied.

3. The motion for a more definite statement will likewise be denied. Proper discovery techniques are available to require plaintiffs to itemize damages; e. g., repair bills, moving bills and lost employment income are not necessary to draft an answer to the complaint.

Paragraph 21 of the complaint by reference to paragraph 14 alleges the particulars wherein the misrepresentations alleged in paragraph 19 were false. Neither the identity of the specific corporate agents need be pleaded with particularity as such facts are within the knowledge of defendants. On the whole, the complaint is not vague. No more specific pleading is necessary to frame a responsive answer.

Orders may be submitted denying all of defendants’ motions.
#### Margaret Minch, Respondent, *v.*Mail and Express Company, Appellant.

*Minch*v. *Mail & Express Co.,*120 App. Div. 875, affirmed.

(Submitted October 2, 1907;

decided November 19, 1907.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered June 7, 1907, which affirmed an order of Special Term overruling a demurrer to the complaint in an action for libel.

*Charles R. Rose*and *Charles L. Burr*for appellant.

*John C. Pheil*for respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs, and question certified answered in the affirmative; no opinion.

Concur : O’Brien, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Hiscock and Chase, JJ. Dissenting: Cullen, Cli. J.
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 79 (Friday, April 24, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 22939]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-09566]

[[Page 22939]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

10 CFR Parts 429 and 431

[Docket No. EERE-2013-BT-TP-0055]
RIN 1905-AD50

Energy Conservation Program: Test Procedure for Pumps; Correction

AGENCY: Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Department of 
Energy.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking and public meeting; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On April 1, 2015, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) 
published in the Federal Register a notice of proposed rulemaking and 
public meeting for Energy Conservation Program: Test Procedure for 
Pumps. This document corrects terms in four equations.

DATES: April 24, 2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ashley Armstrong, U.S. Department of 
Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Building 
Technologies Office, EE-5B, 1000 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, 
DC 20585-0121. Telephone: (202) 586-6590. Email: 
ashley.armstrong@ee.doe.gov.

Corrections

    In the Federal Register published on April 1, 2015, in FR Doc. 
2015-06945, make the following corrections:
    1. On page 17604: Equation (6) is corrected by removing ``13.46'' 
and adding in its place ``17.80''. The corrected equation reads as 
follows:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP24AP15.017

Appendix A to Subpart Y of Part 431--Uniform Test Method for the 
Measurement of Energy Consumption of Pumps. [Corrected]

    2. On page 17645: The equation in section II.B.1.1.1 is corrected 
by removing ``13.46'' and adding in its place ``17.80''. The corrected 
equation reads as follows:

[eta]pump,STD = -0.85 * 
In(Q100[percnt])2 - 0.38 * In(NS) * 
In(Q100[percnt]) - 11.48 * In(NS)2 + 
17.80 * In(Q100[percnt]) + 179.80 * In(NS) - (C - 
555.6)

    3. On page 17646: The equation in section III.D.1.2.1 is corrected 
by removing ``MotorH'' and adding in its place ``MotorHP''. The 
corrected equation reads as follows:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP24AP15.001

    4. On page 17648: The equation in section V.D.1.2.1 is corrected by 
removing ``MotorHPMotorH'' and adding in its place ``MotorHP''. The 
corrected equation reads as follows:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP24AP15.002

    Issued in Washington, DC, on April 20, 2015.
Kathleen B. Hogan,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency, Energy Efficiency and 
Renewable Energy.
[FR Doc. 2015-09566 Filed 4-23-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
#### § 14.21 Form.

*Application.* The application shall be prepared and submitted in accordance with the requirements of this section. It should be in typewritten form or legible handwriting. It must specify that it is made pursuant to the regulations in this part and that the applicant agrees that the right-of-way if approved, will be subject to the terms and conditions of the applicable regulations contained in this part. It should also cite the act to be invoked and state the primary purposes for which the right-of-way is to be used. Applications shall be filed with the superintendent. If the right-of-way has been utilized without authority prior to the time the application is made, the application must state the date such utilization commenced and by whom, and the date the applicant alleges he obtained control of the improvements.
#### § 401.7 Cooperation with other than Government entities.

The Commission has the discretion to cooperate with citizens of the United States, States, municipalities, or associations desiring to build war memorials outside the United States.