alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32.01**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT AND CHIEFEXECUTIVE OFFICER**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Entercom CommunicationsCorp. (the “Company”) hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

 

(i)    the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qof the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009 (the “Report”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d),as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(ii)   the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
| Date:  August 5, 2009 |                                   |
|----------------------------|----------------------------------------|
|                       |                                   |
|                       |                                   |
| By:                        | /s/  David J. Field                    |   |
| Name:                      | David  J. Field                        |   |
| Title:                     | President  and Chief Executive Officer |   |
|                       | (principal  executive officer)         |   |

 

*A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to Entercom Communications Corp. and willbe retained by Entercom Communications Corp. and furnished to the Securitiesand Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.*

 

1

----
§ 1172.31 Compliance reviews. ( a ) NEH may conduct compliance reviews, pre-award reviews, and other similar procedures in order to investigate and correct violations of the Act and the regulations in this part. NEH may conduct these reviews even in the absence of a complaint against the recipient. Reviews may be as comprehensive as necessary to determine whether a recipient is in compliance with the Act and this part.
( b ) If a compliance review or pre-award review indicates a violation of the Act and the regulations in this part, NEH will attempt to contact the recipient and achieve the recipient's voluntary compliance. If the recipient does not comply voluntarily, NEH may pursue enforcement efforts as described in § 1172.36.
N. Y. COMMON PLEAS.

#### Brockway agt. Brien.

*The first order,*in supplementary proceedings, appointing a referee, &c., *must he finished*or some order made by the court in the proceeding, before any other order can be made in the premises.

*Special Term*June, 1869.

Mr. Rust, *counsel for plaintiff,*

*made a motion*for an attachment against defendant for contempt in dissolving an an order supplemental to execution, made by his Honor Judge Brady, dated June 1, 1869, commanding the defendant to appear before Thaddeus H. Lane Esq., referee, and submit to an examination as a judgment debtor.

J. M. Sheehan, *counsel for*defendant,

admitted service of the order and the disobedience of it under his instructions; and rested his opposition on the fact that although seven or eight orders were granted for the examination of the defendant, and motions for attachment for contempt of each of them made against the defendant, they were all denied on the ground that the papers of the plaintiff’s *attorney were*informal; but now, to settle the practice, he admitted the papers for contempt in the present motion were correct; but he objected to the jurisdiction of the court on the ground that in February last, an order was made herein appointing Felix V. B. Kennedy Esqr. referee, which order, though repudiated by the plaintiff, after obtaining the same, was still in existence, and that therefore the court had no jurisdiction of the proposed centempt.

Mr. Sheehan

stated that he wished to make this a test case to settle the practice in supplementary proceedings, as *271to his own knowledge great wi’ong was being done by changing referees and making orders while the first orders were still in force, and not set aside by any order of the court; and requested the judge to settle the practice, which was, up to this time doubtful.

Daly First Judge, coincided with defendants counsel, and decided that the first order in a supplementary proceeding must be finished or some order made by the court in the proceeding, before any other order could be made in the premises.

Motion denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Cancellation of notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement. 

# SUMMARY:

                        The Allegheny National Forest is canceling its published notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement for the Brush Creek Project on the Marienville Ranger District (FR Document 99-5430, March 4, 1999) published in the                         **Federal Register**                        , Volume 64, No. 43, Friday March 5, 1999, pages 10618-19 and (FR Document 03-5253 filed March 6, 2003) published in the                         **Federal Register**                        , Volume 68, No. 45, Friday March 7, 2003, pages 11033-35. This project has been started and delayed twice. It has now been redesigned and the level of impact is no longer anticipated to require an Environment Impact Statement. An Environmental Assessment will be prepared to determine whether an Environmental Impact Statement is needed.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kevin Treese, District NEPA Coordinator, Marienville Ranger District, HC 2 Box 130, Marienville, PA 16239 or by telephone at 814-927-6628.

## Responsible Official

Robert T. Fallon, District Ranger, Marienville Ranger District, HC 2 Box 130, Marienville, PA 16239 or by telephone at 814-927-6628.

Dated: October 26, 2006.

Kathleen S. Morse,

Forest Supervisor.

[FR Doc. 06-9108  Filed 11-7-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 901 

To amend the Animal Health Protection Act to improve the prevention of 

the spread of animal diseases, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 21, 2023 

Mr. BRAUN (for himself, Ms. SMITH, Mr. COONS, and Mr. WICKER) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 

A BILL 

To amend the Animal Health Protection Act to improve 

the prevention of the spread of animal diseases, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Safe American Food 

5 Exports Act of 2023’’ or the ‘‘SAFE Act of 2023’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ENGAGEMENT WITH KEY EXPORT MARKETS. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 10405 of the Animal 

8 Health Protection Act (7 U.S.C. 8304) is amended— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 901 IS

1 (1) by redesignating subsection (d) as sub2 section (e); and 

3 (2) by inserting after subsection (c) the fol4 lowing: 

5 ‘‘(d) ENGAGEMENT WITH KEY EXPORT MARKETS.— 

6 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary, acting 

7 through the Administrator of the Animal and Plant 

8 Health Inspection Service and the Under Secretary 

9 of Agriculture for Trade and Foreign Agricultural 

10 Affairs, in coordination with the Administrator of 

11 the Food Safety and Inspection Service, may pre12 emptively negotiate, to the extent practicable, re13 gionalization agreements regarding outbreaks of 

14 known animal disease threats with the governments 

15 of countries with key export markets for any animal, 

16 article, or associated means of conveyance from the 

17 United States. 

18 ‘‘(2) RESEARCH.—A negotiation carried out 

19 under paragraph (1) is encouraged to take into ac20 count accepted global research advances.’’. 

21 (b) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this sec22 tion— 

23 (1) limits the ability of the Secretary of Agri24 culture to negotiate trade agreements; or 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 901 IS

1 (2) requires the Secretary of Agriculture to con2 dition other trade agreements on the inclusion of 

3 language relating to regionalization as described in 

4 subsection (d)(1) of section 10405 of the Animal 

5 Health Protection Act (7 U.S.C. 3804). 

6 SEC. 3. EXPORT LIBRARY ADMINISTRATION. 

7 The Secretary of Agriculture shall promulgate a reg8 ulation to require that, in the case of any language re9 moved from the Import and Export Library of the Food 

10 Safety and Inspection Service, the Administrator of the 

11 Food Safety and Inspection Service shall directly notify 

12 each State department of agriculture, each lead State 

13 agency for animal disease, and any entity that petitioned 

14 for the inclusion of that language of such removal not later 

15 than 3 days after such removal. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Counsel of Record,

Attached is the order noting probable jurisdiction in Nos. 02-1674, et al., 

setting the briefing schedule, and setting argument for September 8, 2003. 

The order does not address the page limitations for briefs. Page limits for 

briefs will presumptively be those provided for in the Court's Rules. Longer 

briefs may be allowed if combinations of parties agree to submit common 

briefs on particular issues; and shorter briefs may be prescribed for certain 

issues.

Counsel are directed to file with the Clerk of the Court a coordinated 

proposal by noon, Tuesday, June 10, 2003. The proposal shall:

A. Identify issues upon which two or more parties can present a common

position;

B. Propose a page limit on the portion of briefs addressing each such

issue on behalf of parties with a common position; and

C. Identify issues upon which there is no common position, with the

parties' suggestions for brief pages necessary to address them.

Please, be certain to acknowledge receipt of this transmission via e-mail. If 

you have any questions or desire assistance please contact me at 202-479-

3032, or Chris Vasil at 202-479-3027. 

Sincerely,

Merits Cases Clerk,

Denise J. McNerney

fax no. 202-479-3204
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED May 22, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-51044 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DAVID MILLER, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-98-CV-455-DB USDC No. EP-97-CR-90-1-DB

-------------------- Before JONES, STEWART, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * David Miller, federal prisoner # 02280-025, appeals from the district court’s denial of relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion,
which he filed to attack his conviction and sentence on one count of conspiring to possess with intent to distribute an unspecified quantity of marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 and
8 41(a)(1). The district court granted a certificate ofNo. 02-51044 -2- appealability (COA) on the issue of the retroactive applicability
of Apprendi v. New Jersey , 466 U.S. 530 (20 00), to cases on
collateral review. We have previously determined that T eague v.
Lane , 489 U.S. 288 (1989), b ars the application of Apprendi to

cases on initial collateral review, however, United States v.
Brown , 305 F.3d 304, 310 (5th Cir. 2002), precluding relief here.

In addition to his briefing of the Apprendi issue, Miller

argues that the district court erred in refusing relief on other
claims. Because Miller has failed to make an “express request”
that this court extend t he order granting a COA to include such
issu es, this court need not address these additional arguments.
See United States v . Kimler , 150 F.3d 429, 431 (5th Cir. 1998); Lackey v. Johnson , 116 F.3d 149, 151-52 (5th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed July 14, 2015

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 15

- 00200

- CV

KEVIN COLE, YOLANDA FELDER AND ALL OTHER OCCUPANTS , Appellant

V.

AMERICAN HOMES 4 REN T PROPERTIES ONE LLC , Appellee

On Appeal from the Co unty Civil C our t at Law No

. 1 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1056492

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an appeal from a judgment signed February 3 , 2015. The notice of appeal was filed March 4 , 201 5 . To date, our records show that appellant has not paid the appellate filing fee. See Tex. R. App. P. 5 (requiring payment of fees in civil cases unless party is excused by statute or by appellate rules from paying

costs ); Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 51.207.2 On April 21 , 2015, this court ordered appe llant to pay the appellate filing fee
on or before May 6 , 2015, or the appeal would be dismissed. Appellant has not paid the appellate filing fee. Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case because appellant has failed to comply with notice from clerk requiring response or other action within specified time).

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Brown, and Wise

.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 7537** 

BRIAN DANIELS , Petitioner

- Appellant ,
v. ANTHONY J. PADULA , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Rock Hill
. Patrick Michael Duffy , Senior District Judge. ( 0:09

- cv - 00755

- PMD )

Submitted : January 24, 2013 Decided: February 5, 2013

Before MOTZ and KING , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Brian Daniels, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Alphonso Simon, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding prece dent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Brian Daniels seeks to appeal the district court ’ s order s denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration of the district court ’ s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition and his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion seeking to alter or amend the district court’s order denying Rule 60(b) relief
. * The se order s are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (A) (2006) ; Reid v. Angel one , 369 F. 3d 363, 369 (4th Cir. 2004).
A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “ a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. ” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable

* We reject Daniels’ argument that the district court’s issuance of margin orders violates his due process rights.3 claim of the denial of a constitut ional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Daniels has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. 

# Wnitrb**~tatr~ ~ourt**  

# of**~peaI~** 

# for tbejfeberaI**~irmit** SHANE 

## c. HOLLMER AND LEE E. CLEVELAND, Appellants, 

### v. ELIYAHOU HARARI AND SANJAY MEHROTRA, Appellees. 2011-1276 (Interference No. 105,606) Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Board ofPatent Appeals and Interferences. ON MOTION

ORDER The appellees move for a 28-day extension of time, until August 10, 2011, to file their brief. Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED THAT:HOLLMER v. HARARI The motion is granted. 

# JJL 192011 Date

cc: Deanne E. Maynard, Esq. Timothy R. Volpert, Esq. s21 FOR THE COURT lsI Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk 2



### FILED 

## •.s. COURT OF A!'PfAtS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT 

### JUL 1 92011

JAN HOR8AI.Y 

## tlERK
#### § 291.10 Collecting.

A paleontological resource may only be collected from National Forest System lands in accordance with the casual collecting provisions in §§ 291.11 and 291.12, or in accordance with a permit issued by the Authorized Officer as identified in § 291.13.
SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

ONE HUNDRED SEVENTH CONGRESS 

FIRST SESSION { CONVENEDJANUARY3,2001 

ADJOURNED DECEMBER 20, 2001 

SECOND SESSION { CONVENEDJANUARY23,2002 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Monday, April15, 2002 

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF JERI THOMSON, 

SECRETARY OF THE SENATE 

By Michelle Haynes, Executive Clerk 

Issue No. 41 
1 

RESOLUTIONS 

CALENDAR EX.RES REPORTED 

No. No. SUBJECT BY 
2 

TREATIES 

CALENDAR TREATY REPORTED 

No. Doc. No. SUBJECT BY 

1 106-41 Protocol Relating to the Madrid Agreement Nov 15, 2001 Reported favorably by 

Mr. Biden, Committee on Foreign 

Relations with printed Ex. 

Rept.107-1 and a resolution of 

advice and consent to ratification 

with one understanding, four 

declarations, and two conditions. 
3 

NOMINATIONS 

CALENDAR MESSAGE 

No. No. NOMINEE, OFFICE, AND PREDECESSOR REPORTED 

BY 

INTERNATIONAL JOINT COMMISSION, 

UNITED STATES AND CANADA 

* 403 851 Dennis L. Schornack, of Michigan, to be Sep 25,2001 Reported by Mr. 

Commissioner on the part of the United States Biden, Committee on Foreign 

on the International Joint Commission, United Relations, without printed report. States and Canada, vice Thomas L. Baldini. 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

* 471 875 Eugene Scalia, of Virginia, to be Solicitor for the Oct 17, 2001 Reported by Mr. 

Department of Labor, vice Henry L. Solano, Kennedy, Committee on Health, 

resigned. Education, Labor, and Pensions, 

without printed report. 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

"" 665 1035 Emil H. Frankel, of Connecticut, to be an Dec 19, 2001 Reported by Mr. 

Assistant Secretary of Transportation, vice Hollings, Committee on 

! Eugene A Conti, Jr., resigned. Commerce, Science, and 

Transportation, without printed 

report. 

* 666 1129 Jeffrey Shane, ofthe District of Columbia, to be Dec 19, 2001 Reported by Mr. 

Associate Deputy Secretary of Transportation, Hollings, Committee on 

I vice Stephen D. VanBeek, resigned. Commerce, Science, and 

I 

Transportation, without printed 

report. 

I 

I THE JUDICIARY 

759 I 882 Terrence L. O'Brian, ofWyoming, to be United Apr 11, 2002 Reported by Mr. 

I States Circuit Judge for the Tenth Circuit, vice Leahy, Committee on the 

l Wade Brorby, retired. Judiciary, without printed report. 

I 

760 I 1323 Lance M. Africk, of Louisiana, to be United States Apr 11,2002 Reported by Mr. 

I District Judge for the Eastern District of Leahy, Committee on the I Louisiana, vice Edith Brown Clement, Judiciary, without printed report. 

I elevated. 

761 I Legrome D. Davis, of Pennsylvania, to be United Apr 11, 2002 Reported by Mr. 1331 

States District Judge for the Eastern District Leahy, Committee on the 

ofPennsylvania, vice Edmund V. Ludwig, Judiciary, without printed report. 

retired. 

I 

*Signifies nominee's commitment to respond to requests to appear and testify before any duly constituted commtttee of the Senate 
4 

NOMINATIONS PLACED ON THE SECRETARY'S DESK
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18

- 11237 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

DANIELL NAVAREZ, JR., also known as Daniel Navarez

,

Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:13

- CR

- 26

- 9

Before DAVIS, JONES, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Daniell Navarez, Jr.

has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with
Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d
229 (5th Cir. 2011). Navarez h a s n ot filed a response. We have reviewed
counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We
concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED May 14, 2019
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 18-11237 Document: 00514956269 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/14/2019No. 18

- 11237

2 issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for l eave to withdraw
is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 18-11237 Document: 00514956269 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/14/2019
Exhibit
      32





CERTIFICATION
      OF THE


PRINCIPAL
      EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Paul
      D.
      Hamm ,
      the
      Chief Executive Officer and acting as Chief Financial Officer of Integrated
      Media Holdings, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
      Report of Integrated Media Holdings, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended
      September 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained
      in
      such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects
      the financial condition and results of operations of Integrated Media Holdings,
      Inc.





Date:
      November 20, 2006




*/s/* *Paul
      D. Hamm*


Paul
      D.
      Hamm


Chief
      Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
#### § 1302.100 Purpose.

A program must provide management and a process of ongoing monitoring and continuous improvement for achieving program goals that ensures child safety and the delivery of effective, high-quality program services.