alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Incumbent/ Contributions and Loans

Rank Candidate Name State Party Challenger/Open from the Candidate

1 MCMAHON, LINDA CT Republican Party Open $50,104,984

2 GREENE, JEFF FL Democratic Party Open $23,788,078

3 HERMAN, RAPHAEL FL Democratic Party Open $10,003,036

4 JOHNSON, RONALD HAROLD WI Republican Party Challenger $8,938,465

5 PAGLIUCA, STEVE MA Democratic Party Open $7,775,880

6 FIORINA, CARLY CA Republican Party Challenger $6,801,080

7 BINNIE, WILLIAM H NH Republican Party Open $6,762,594

8 MALPASS, DAVID ROBERT NY Republican Party Challenger $2,612,500

9 BLUMENTHAL, RICHARD CT Democratic Party Open $2,547,489

10 RAESE, JOHN REEVES WV Republican Party Open $2,390,000

11 DIOGUARDI, JOSEPH J NY Republican Party Challenger $2,164,044

12 LOWDEN, SUE NV Republican Party Challenger $1,924,985

13 GANLEY, THOMAS D OH Republican Party Open $1,633,367

14 WALL, TERRENCE R WI Republican Party Challenger $1,475,000

15 WIENS, THOMAS J CO Republican Party Challenger $1,331,569

16 CHACHAS, JOHN GREGORY NV Republican Party Challenger $1,320,000

17 HOFFMAN, DAVID IL Democratic Party Open $1,075,000

18 CONLIN, ROXANNE BARTON IA Democratic Party Challenger $1,067,070

19 BENDER, JAMES C NH Republican Party Open $1,049,050

20 WARGOTZ, ERIC MD Republican Party Challenger $975,000

21 SCHIFF, PETER DAVID CT Republican Party Open $837,000

22 BENNET, MICHAEL F CO Democratic Party Incumbent $803,570

23 AKERS, PAUL WA Republican Party Challenger $657,528

24 CONWAY, JOHN WILLIAM (JACK) KY Democratic Party Open $653,267

25 MEISTER, JACOB J IL Democratic Party Open $616,055

26 ROBINSON, JACK E MA Republican Party Open $571,045

27 TARKANIAN, DANNY NV Republican Party Challenger $549,074

28 FOLEY, THOMAS C CT Republican Party Open $539,000

29 GLASSMAN, RODNEY BRITZ AZ Democratic Party Challenger $500,020

30 MOSLER, WARREN BRUCE CT Independent Open $435,300

31 BRIDGEWATER, TIM UT Republican Party Challenger $393,230

32 SESTAK, JOSEPH A JR PA Democratic Party Challenger $369,750

33 GOODE, GAIL NY Democratic Party Challenger $365,000

34 ROMANOFF, ANDREW CO Democratic Party Challenger $362,500

35 BLAKEMAN, BRUCE NY Republican Party Challenger $337,806

36 JOHNSON, WILLIAM EJNER JR KY Republican Party Open $255,000

37 HUGHES, PATRICK IL Republican Party Open $253,405

38 COONS, CHRISTOPHER A DE Democratic Party Open $250,000

39 COATS, DANIEL R IN Republican Party Open $225,000

40 HENDREN, KIM DEXTER AR Republican Party Challenger $205,000

41 SWEENEY, MAURICE MARION KY Democratic Party Open $160,917

42 ALPERT, MERRICK CT Democratic Party Open $144,125

43 CAVASSO, CAMPBELL HI Republican Party Challenger $135,133

44 HOEVEN, JOHN ND Republican Party Open $130,626

45 DABNEY, COREY IL Democratic Party Open $127,318

46 CAPUANO, MICHAEL E MA Democratic Party Open $125,000

47 LEE, MIKE UT Republican Party Incumbent $125,000

48 RAWL, ALFRED VICTOR SC Democratic Party Challenger $125,000

49 KHAZEI, ALAN MA Democratic Party Open $114,685

50 MCGOWAN, CHAD ALAN SC Democratic Party Challenger $112,000

Congressional Candidate Table 3d

Top 50 Senate Campaigns by Contributions and Loans from the Candidate

January 1, 2009 - December 31, 2010
Total U.S. Exports of  W&G Woven Shirts

Data in Thousand Dollars 

Data For  JUN. 1999

|Country  | 1995  | 1996  | 1997  | 1998  | Year to Date 6/1998 | Year to Date 6/1999 | % Change | Year Ending 6/1998 | Year Ending 6/1999 | % Change | % Share
|-------- | ----- | ----- | ----- | ----- | ------------------- | ------------------- | -------- | ------------------ | ------------------ | -------- | -------
|WORLD    | 72959 | 73835 | 81972 | 93778 | 43691               | 48304               | 10.56    | 86440              | 98391              | 13.83    | 100    
|MEXICO   | 27986 | 31232 | 32931 | 45849 | 20196               | 20767               | 2.83     | 38440              | 46421              | 20.76    | 47.18  
|CANADA   | 11630 | 12516 | 16209 | 17551 | 8862                | 9133                | 3.05     | 17267              | 17822              | 3.21     | 18.11  
|DOM REP  | 2432  | 5182  | 6249  | 6473  | 2445                | 2361                | -3.43    | 6048               | 6389               | 5.63     | 6.49   
|SALVADR  | 6330  | 2178  | 3927  | 4127  | 2095                | 3458                | 65.08    | 3742               | 5491               | 46.71    | 5.58   
|GUATMAL  | 3231  | 3331  | 2002  | 2603  | 1811                | 2044                | 12.9     | 3013               | 2836               | -5.84    | 2.88   
|JAPAN    | 6522  | 5113  | 4681  | 2478  | 1297                | 1195                | -7.85    | 2529               | 2376               | -6.02    | 2.42   
|COLOMB   | 1753  | 973   | 1090  | 1339  | 429                 | 1177                | 174.37   | 1031               | 2087               | 102.49   | 2.12   
|HONDURA  | 493   | 1532  | 2557  | 3792  | 2643                | 912                 | -65.48   | 4572               | 2062               | -54.9    | 2.1    
|U KING   | 785   | 1249  | 554   | 676   | 238                 | 892                 | 274.3    | 405                | 1330               | 228.42   | 1.35   
|_WTO     | 71624 | 73263 | 81280 | 92316 | 43081               | 47715               | 10.76    | 85473              | 96949              | 13.43    | 98.54  
|_OECD    | 15766 | 16878 | 21672 | 20644 | 10184               | 10990               | 7.91     | 21218              | 21449              | 1.09     | 21.8   
|_CBI     | 15770 | 14346 | 17406 | 19361 | 9722                | 9962                | 2.46     | 19567              | 19600              | 0.17     | 19.92  
|_SAMERIC | 5842  | 1975  | 2916  | 3107  | 1042                | 2468                | 136.76   | 2359               | 4532               | 92.11    | 4.61   
|_EU15    | 3125  | 3467  | 3442  | 2504  | 1042                | 1604                | 53.9     | 2705               | 3066               | 13.35    | 3.12   
|_EU12    | 3053  | 3360  | 3042  | 2392  | 939                 | 1591                | 69.47    | 2280               | 3044               | 33.54    | 3.09   
|_non-WTO | 1335  | 573   | 692   | 1462  | 610                 | 589                 | -3.38    | 966                | 1441               | 49.17    | 1.46
BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

In the Matter of ) 

) LRA917 

Request for Consideration of a Legal ) 

Qu^tion ) 

CERTinCAnON 

I, Shelley E. Garr, recording secretary for the Federal Election Commission executive 

session on Novraber 28,2012, do hereby certify that the Commission decided by a vote of S-1 

to conclude that 11 C.F.R. § 106.7(d)(1) requires the Committees to keep a monthly log for 

employees paid exclusively ^th federal fimds and inform the requestor that, as an exercise of 

prosecutorial discretion, the Commission vnll not pursue recordkeeping violations for the fidlure 

to keep time logs or provide afBdavits to account for employee salaries paid for with 100% 

federal funds and reported as such. 

Commissioriers Baueriy, Hunter, McGahn II, Petersen, and Weintraub voted 

afGrmatively for the decision. Commissioner Walther dissented. 

Attest: 

—J^yfjLnyliULKJ tSa/JL 

Date Shelley E. QM 

Deputy Secretary of the Commission
p080039.en2.txt INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 08-0039 Post-Focus Draft Revision 2 7/17/2008 ENGINEER: Austin \ CLM PV (kg/yr): Revision Notes / Assessment Overview:

SUBMITTER: USE:

OTHER USES:

MSDS: Yes Label: No Gen Eqpt: Respirator: Health Effects: TLV/PEL: CRSS (11/05/2007): Chemical Name: S-H20: VP: MW: Physical State and Misc CRSS Info: Page 1p080039.en2.txt Neat: Mfg: Proc/Form: End Use:

Consumer Use: SAT (concerns) (11/06/2007): Migration to groundwater: Slow due to biodegradation PBT rating: P1B1T2 Health: 2 Dermal, Drinking Water, Inhalation, Fish ingestion, Eco: 3 Water (All releases to water with a CC = 8 ppb), OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 1A NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS: Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER.

POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS: P2 Claim:

Page 2p080039.en2.txt EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEW: INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 08-0039 Number of Sites/ Location: Days/yr: Basis: Process Description:
ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below may coincide with daily releases from the other sources to the same medium.

Output 2: from: basis:

Conservative: to: from: basis:

RELEASE TOTAL kg/yr - OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes: Basis: Page 3p080039.en2.txt Inhalation:

Dermal: Exposure to at concentration High End: Number of workers (all sites) with dermal exposure: Basis:

Page 4
United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 15, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

In the

United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

_______________

m 02-20354

_______________

WILLIE E. PRATT

AND

BERNARD GARRETT,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

VERSUS

CITY OF HOUSTON,

Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

m H-98-CV-3587

_________________________

Before SMITH, WIENER, and BARKSDALE,

Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

*

Willie Pratt and Bernard Garrett appeal a

judgment, following a bench trial, in which the

district court, after a remand by this court,

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has

determined that this opinion should not be published

(continued...)

*

 (...continued)

and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
2

found no racialdiscrimination bythe defendant

employer, the City of Houston. We have

reviewed the briefs and applicable authorities

and pertinent portions of the record and have

heard the arguments of counsel. We conclude

that the district court was correct in its decision and, in any event, did not commit clear

error under FED. R. CIV. P. 52.

The judgment is AFFIRMED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Highway Administration

# AGENCY:

Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), DOT

# ACTION:

Notice of termination.

# SUMMARY:

The FHWA is issuing this notice to advise the public that the effort to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for transportation improvements to Cross Hollow Road, from I-15 to SR-56, located in Cedar City, Utah, will be terminated. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sandra A. Garcia-Aline, Transportation Engineer, FHWA, Utah Division, 2520 West 4700 South, Suite 9A, Salt Lake City, UT 84118, Telephone (801) 963-0182; or Daryl Friant, Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT), 1345 South 350 West, Richfield, UT 84701, Telephone (435) 893-4714. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The FHWA in cooperation with the UDOT and Cedar City have elected to terminate efforts to prepare an EIS for transportation improvements on Cross Hollow Road between I-15 and SR-56. The Notice of Intent for this project was originally published on March 10, 2005. Cedar City has recently elected not to use federal funds on the project. Therefore, no federal funds or federal action will be required for the revised project. The FHWA, in conjunction with the Utah Department of Transportation, has decided to discontinue efforts on this project. If you have any questions regarding the revised Cross Hollow Road project or would like to provide scoping comments, please contact Tamerha Maxwell, UDOT Project Manager, at (435) 865-5511. 

(Catalog of Federal and Domestic Assistance Program Number 20.205, Highway Research, Planning and Construction. The regulations implementing Executive Order 12372 regarding intergovernmental consultation on Federal programs and activities apply to this program.)

Sandra A. Garcia-Aline,

NEPA Manager, Federal Highway Administration, Salt Lake, Utah.

[FR Doc. 06-923 Filed 1-31-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-22-M
Executive Order 13414

# Amendment to Executive Order 13402, Strengthening Federal Efforts To Protect Against Identity Theft

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, and in order to amend the date by which the Identity Theft Task Force shall submit to the President its coordinated strategic plan, it is hereby ordered that section 3(a) of Executive Order 13402 of May 10, 2006, is amended to read as follows: “review the activities of executive branch departments, agencies, and instrumentalities relating to the policy set forth in section 1, and building upon these prior activities, prepare and submit in writing to the President by February 9, 2007, or as soon as practicable thereafter as the Chairman and Co-Chairman shall determine, a coordinated strategic plan to further improve the effectiveness and efficiency of the Federal Government's activities in the areas of identity theft awareness, prevention, detection, and prosecution.”.

[FR Doc. 06-9148

Billing code 3195-01-P
###### Editorial Note on Part 1304

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1304 appear at 89 FR 67817, Aug. 21, 2024.

#### § 1304.16 Use of CLASS: Pre-K instrument in the Designation Renewal System.

Except when all children are served in a single classroom, ACF will conduct observations of multiple classes operated by the grant recipient based on a random sample of all classes and rate the conduct of the classes observed using the CLASS: Pre-K instrument. When the grant recipient serves children in its program in a single class, that class will be observed and rated using the CLASS: Pre-K instrument. The domain scores for that class will be the domain scores for the grant recipient for that observation. After the observations are completed, ACF will report to the grant recipient the scores of the classes observed during the CLASS: Pre-K observations in each of the domains covered by the CLASS: Pre-K instrument. ACF will average CLASS: Pre-K instrument scores in each domain for the classes operated by the agency that ACF observed to determine the agency's score in each domain.
#### Arthur E. Campbell *vs.*H. O. Camp.

October Term, 1896.

Present: Ross, C. J., Rowell, Tyler, Munson and Thompson, JJ.

*General Issue in Replevin*— No *Demurrer to Notice.*

Not guilty is, by statute, the proper general issue in replevin.

A notice filed with the general issue is not subject to demurrer. If insufficient, objection may be made to the evidence offered under it.

Replevin. Plea, not guilty and notice of justification. Heard on general and special demurrer to the plea and notice, at the March Term, 1896, ■ Washington County, Start, J., presiding.

Demurrer overruled. The plaintiff excepted.

*John W. Gordon*for the plaintiff.

(1) The notice is insufficient because it says that the defendant “took said goods, if at all” etc. which is neither an avowry nor an admission of the taking. It is the general issue, not a justification.

(2) The notice is insufficient because it does not show a return of the warrant. *Wright*v. *Marvin,*59 Yt. 437; *Elhs*v. Cleveland, 54 Yt. 437.

(3) Under the general issue the defendant cannot have a return of the goods. I Chittv 537.

(4) The defendant has the wrong general issue.

*Richard A. Hoar*for the defendant.

Y. S. 1471 makes “not guilty” the proper general issue in replevin. *Plainfield*v. *Baichelder,*44 Yt. 9; *Loop*v. *Williams,*47 Yt. 407.

The notice is sufficient, as is held in the same cases.

Rowell, J.

This is replevin for seventy bottles of beer, alleged to have been taken by the defendant as deputy sheriff, from the plaintiff’s store, on a warrant of search and *98seizure. Plea, not guilty, and notice of justification under said warrant. Both the plea and the notice are demurred to.

As to the demurrer to the plea, the statute provides that *the*general issue shall be joined *on the*plea *of not*guilty, and this court has held in cases just like this that such a plea is good. *Plainfield*v. Batchelder, 44 Vt. 9; *Loop*v. *Williams,*47 Vt. 407.

As to the demurrer to the notice, it is sufficient to say that a notice is not the subject of demurrer. If insufficient, advantage must be taken of it by objecting to the testimony offered under it.

*Judgment affirmed and cause remanded.*
SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NINETY-NINTH CONGRESS 

Convened January 3, 1985 

FIRST SESSION { 

SECOND SESSION { 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Wednesday, July 17, 1985 

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF JO-ANNE L. COE, 

SECRETARY OF THE SENATE 

By Gerald A. Hackett, Executive Clerk 
1 

NOMINATIONS 

Calendar Message Nominee, Office, And Predecessor Reported 

* 

* 

No. No. 'Bv 

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY 

COMMISSION 

202 1-54 Rosalie Gaull Silberman, of California, to May 23, 85 Mr. Hatch, 

be a Member of the Equal Employment Committee on Labor and 

Opportunity Commission for the remainder Human Resources, without 

of the term expiring July l, 1985, vice printed report 

Cathie A. Shattuck, to which position she 

was appointed during the last recess of 

the Senate. 

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

284 337 John William Bode, of Oklahoma, to be an Jun 27, 85 Mr. Helms, 

A~istant Secretary of Agriculture, vice Committee on Agriculture, 

Mary Claiborne Jarratt, resigning. Nutrition, and Forestry, 

without printed renort. 

*Signifies nominee's commitment to respond to requests to appear and testify before any duly 

constituted committee of the Senate.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of ISP Chemco Inc.
(the "Company") for the quarterly period ended September 28, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Sunil
Kumar, as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Neal E.
Murphy, as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his
knowledge and belief:

         (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


 /s/ Sunil Kumar
----------------------------------
Name:   Sunil Kumar
Title:  President and Chief Executive Officer

Date:   November 11, 2003


  /s/ Neal E. Murphy
----------------------------------
Name:   Neal E. Murphy
Title:  Senior Vice President and
           Chief Financial Officer

Date:   November 11, 2003


     This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
§ 1151.11 Handicapped person. ( a ) *Handicapped person* means any person who has a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities, has a record of such an impairment, or is regarded as having such an impairment. For purposes of section 504, in connection with employment, this term does not include any individual who is an alcoholic or drug abuser whose current use of alcohol or drugs prevents such individual from performing the duties of the job in question or whose employment, by reason of such current alcohol or drug abuse, would constitute a direct threat to the property or safety of others.
( b ) As used in paragraph (a) of this section, the phrase: ( 1 ) *Physical or mental impairment* means: ( i ) Any physiological disorder or condition, cosmetic disfigurement, or anatomical loss affecting one or more of the following body systems: Neurological; musculoskeletal; special sense organs; respiratory, including speech organs; cardiovascular; reproductive; digestive; genito-urinary; hemic and lymphatic; skin; and endocrine; or
( ii ) Any mental or psychological disorder, such as mental retardation, organic brain syndrome, emotional and mental illness, and specific learning disabilities. The term *physical or mental impairment* includes, but is not limited to, such diseases and conditions as orthopedic, visual, speech, and hearing impairments, cerebral palsy, epilepsy, muscular dystrophy, multiple sclerosis, cancer, heart disease, diabetes, mental retardation, emotional illness, and drug addiction and alcoholism.
( 2 ) *Major life activities* means functions such as caring for one's self, performing manual tasks, walking, seeing, hearing, speaking, breathing, learning, and working.
( 3 ) *Has a record of such an impairment* means has a history of, or has been misclassified as having, a mental or physical impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities.
( 4 ) *Is regarded as having an impairment* means: ( i ) Has a physical or mental impairment that does not substantially limit major life activities but that is treated by a recipient as constituting such a limitation;
( ii ) Has a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits major life activities only as a result of the attitudes of others toward such impairment;
( iii ) Has none of the impairments defined in paragraph (b)(1) of this section but is treated by a recipient as having such an impairment.
#### § 800.15 Tribal, State, and local program alternatives. [Reserved]