SIP SUBMITTAL COMPLETENESS CRITERIA CHECKLIST

( In accordance with 40 CFR Part 51

- App. V)

SIP Submitted by: West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection

Date Submitted: Jun3, 3, 2015

Subject: 45 CSR 14

– PSD regula tions

Completeness Review

Completed by: Paul Wentworth

Date Completed: June 25, 2015

Administrative Materials

ACCEPTABLE

EPA REQUIREMENT STATE SUBMITTAL (X)

1. A formal letter of submittal from the Governor or his

designee, requesti ng EPA approval of the plan or revision

thereof. 1. Letter of Submission from Cabinet Secretary dated June 3,

2015 X

2. Evidence that the State has adopted the plan in the State code

or body of regulations; or issued the permit, order, or consent

agre ement in final form. That evidence shall include the date

of adoption or final issuance as well as the effective date of the

plan, if different from the adoption/issuance date.

Check to see if the regulation, permit, order or consent decree

has a sunset o r expiration date. If so it is not acceptable as a

SIP submission. 2. R ule was passed on March 31, 2015 by House Bill HB 2283

and became effective on June 1, 201 5 X

3. Evidence that the State has the necessary legal authority

under State law to adop t and implement the plan. 3. WV Register notices are enclosed X

4. A copy of actual regulation, or document submitted for

approval and incorporation by reference into the plan, including

indication of the changes made to the existing approved plan, 4. Copy of Regulation enclosed

XEPA REQUIREMENT STATE SUBMITTAL (X)

whe re applicable. The submittal shall be a copy of the official

State regulation/document signed, stamped, dated by the

appropriate State official indicating that it is fully enforceable

by the State. The effective date of the regulation/document

shall, whe never possible, be indicated in the document itself.

5. Evidence that the State followed all of the procedural

requirements of the State's laws and constitution in conducting

and completing the adoption/issuance o f the plan. 5. Evidence is provided in SIP package X

6. Evidence that public notice was given of the proposed

change consistent with procedures approved by EPA, including

the date of publication of such notice. 6. Public notice information included X

7. Certification that public hearings were held in accordance

with the information provided in the public notice and the

State's laws and constitution, if applicable. 7. Public hearing notification enclosed X

8. Compilation of public comments and th e State's response

thereto. 8. There were no comments regarding the proposed revisions X

Technical Materials

1. Identification of all regulated pollutants affect ed by the plan. 1. PSD sources are identified in the plan package X

2. Identification of the locations of affected sources including

the EPA attainment/nonattainment designation of the locations

and the status of the attainment plan for the affected a rea(s). 2. PSD sources identified X

3. Quantification of the changes in plan allowable emissions

from the affected sources; estimates of changes in current

actual emissions from affected sources or, where appropriate,

quantification of changes in actua l emissions from affected

sources through calculations of the differences between certain

baseline levels and allowable emissions anticipated as a result

of the revision. 3. N/A

4. The State's demonstration that the national ambient air 4. PSD sources are identified. XEPA REQUIREMENT STATE SUBMITTAL (X)

quality stan dards, prevention of significant deterioration

increments, reasonable further progress demonstration, and

visibility, as applicable, are protected if the plan is approved

and implemented.

5. Modeling information requi red to support the proposed

revision, including input data, output data, models used,

ambient monitoring data used, meteorological data used,

justification for use of offsite data (where used), modes of

models used, assumptions, and other information rele vant to the

determination of adequacy of the modeling analysis. 5. N/A

6. Evidence, where necessary, that emission limitations are

based on continuous emission reduction technology. 6 N/A

7. Evidence that the plan contains emission limitations, work

practice standards and recordkeeping/reporting requirements,

where necessary, to ensure emission levels. 7. N/A

8. Compliance/enforcement strategies, including how

compliance will be determined in practice. 8 N/A

9. Special economic and t echnological justifications required by

any applicable EPA policies. (If a policy is not appropriate,

explain why.) 9. N/A

10. A Section 107 request must be accompanied by a

maintenance plan demonstrating maintenance to the relevant

NAAQS for at leas t 10 years after redesignation. 10. N/A