alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

No. 17-5049 September Term, 2017

 FILED ON: JUNE 15, 2018

CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON AND MELANIE T. SLOAN,

APPELLANTS

v.

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION,

APPELLEE

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Columbia

(No. 1:15-cv-02038)

Before: KAVANAUGH and PILLARD, Circuit Judges, and RANDOLPH, Senior Circuit Judge

J U D G M E N T

This cause came on to be heard on the record on appeal from the United States District

Court for the District of Columbia and was argued by counsel. On consideration thereof, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the judgment of the District Court appealed from in this

cause is hereby affirmed, in accordance with the opinion of the court filed herein this date.

Per Curiam

FOR THE COURT:

Mark J. Langer, Clerk

BY: /s/

Ken Meadows

Deputy Clerk

Date: June 15, 2018

Opinion for the court filed by Senior Circuit Judge Randolph.

Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge Pillard.

USCA Case #17-5049 Document #1736006 Filed: 06/15/2018 Page 1 of 1
§ 150.103 Definitions. The definitions that appear in part 144 of this subchapter apply to this part 150, unless stated otherwise. As used in this part: Amendment, endorsement, or rider means a document that modifies or changes the terms or benefits of an individual policy, group policy, or certificate of insurance.
*Application* means a signed statement of facts by a potential insured that an issuer uses as a basis for its decision whether, and on what basis to insure an individual, or to issue a certificate of insurance, or that a non-Federal governmental health plan uses as a basis for a decision whether to enroll an individual under the plan.
*Certificate of insurance* means the document issued to a person or entity covered under an insurance policy issued to a group health plan or an association or trust that summarizes the benefits and principal provisions of the policy.
*Complaint* means any expression, written or oral, indicating a potential denial of any right or protection contained in PHS Act requirements (whether ultimately justified or not) by an individual, a personal representative or other entity acting on behalf of an individual, or any entity that believes such a right is being or has been denied an individual.
*Group health insurance policy or group policy* means the legal document or contract issued by an issuer to a plan sponsor with respect to a group health plan (including a plan that is a non-Federal governmental plan) that contains the conditions and terms of the insurance that covers the group.
*Individual health insurance policy or individual policy* means the legal document or contract issued by the issuer to an individual that contains the conditions and terms of the insurance. Any association or trust arrangement that is not a group health plan as defined in § 144.103 of this subchapter or does not provide coverage in connection with one or more group health plans is individual coverage subject to the requirements of parts 147 and 148 of this subchapter. The term “individual health insurance policy” includes a policy that is— ( 1 ) Issued to an association that makes coverage available to individuals other than in connection with one or more group health plans; or
( 2 ) Administered, or placed in a trust, and is not sold in connection with a group health plan subject to the provisions of parts 146 and 147 of this subchapter.
*PHS Act requirements* means the requirements of title XXVII of the PHS Act and its implementing regulations in parts 146, 147, and 148 of this subchapter.
*Plan document* means the legal document that provides the terms of the plan to individuals covered under a group health plan, such as a non-Federal governmental health plan.
*State law* means all laws, decisions, rules, regulations, or other State action having the effect of law, of any State as defined in § 144.103 of this subchapter. A law of the United States applicable to the District of Columbia is treated as a State law rather than a law of the United States.
[64 FR 45795, Aug. 20, 1999, as amended at 78 FR 13439, Feb. 27, 2013; 86 FR 24286, May 5, 2021]
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**




**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**




**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**




**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tasker Products Corp. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008 as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
      I, Doreen J. Remmen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company as of and for
      the periods presented in the Report.




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




August
      14, 2008




/s/
                Doreen J. RemmenDoreen
                J. RemmenChief
                Financial Officer(Principal
                Financial and Accounting
                Officer)
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 15, 2019

No. 04-19-00032-CR

Jemadari Chinua WILLIAMS,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CR6613

Honorable Kevin M. O’Connell, Judge Presiding

ORDER

This appeal is DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION.

It is so ORDERED on May 15, 2019.

_____________________________

Irene Rios, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 15th day of May, 2019.

_____________________________

Keith E. Hottle, Clerk of Court
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JAMES L. GRAHAM,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D17-3085

[October 4, 2018]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Raag Singhal, Judge; 

L.T. Case No. 07-13655CF10A.

James L. Graham, South Bay, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Don M. Rogers, 

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

MAY, LEVINE and CONNER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
§ 223.8 Delegations of authority to approve free use by individuals. ( a ) Forest officers whom the supervisor may designate are authorized to grant free use of timber to individuals up to $200 in value in any one fiscal year. Supervisors may grant permits for material not exceeding $5,000 in value. Regional Foresters may approve permits for larger amounts, and in times of emergency may delegate authority to supervisors for not over $10,000 in value. Prior review by the Chief of the Forest Service will be given if the amount involved exceeds $10,000 in value.
( b ) Regional Foresters may authorize supervisors to permit the removal of specific classes of material without scaling or measurement.
[42 FR 28252, June 2, 1977. Redesignated at 49 FR 2760, Jan. 23, 1984, as amended at 71 FR 525, Jan. 4, 2006]
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Patrick Shanley, Appellant, *v.*Theodore A. Bingham, as Police Commissioner of the City of New York, et al., Respondents.

(No. 2.)

*People ex rel. Shanley*v. *Bingham,*126 App. Div. 914, appeal dismissed.

(Submitted January *5,*1909;

decided January 19, 1909.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered June 10, 1908, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying a motion to compel the defendants to make a further return to a writ of certiorari.

*J. J. Bennett*for appellant.

*Francis K.*Pendleton, *Corporation Counsel (Theodore Connoly*and *Royal E. T. Riggs*of counsel), for respondents.

Appeal dismissed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Edward T. Bartlett, Yann, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock and Chase, JJ.
SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

ONE HUNDRED SEVENTH CONGRESS 

FIRST SESSION { COJ)1VENEDJANUARY3,2001 

SECOND SESSION { 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Thursday, September 20, 2001 

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF JERI THOMSON, 

SECRETARY OF THE SENATE 

By Michelle Haynes, Executive Clerk 
UNANDKOUSCONSENTAGREEMENT 

Ordered, That on Friday, September 21,2001, immediately following the convening of the Senate at 9:00a.m 

the Senate proceed to executive session to consider en bloc the nominations of Sharon Prost, of the District of ., 

Columbia, to be United States Circuit Judge for the Federal Circuit (Cal. No. 360) and Reggie B. Walton, of the 

District of Columbia, to be United States District Judge for the District of Columbia (Cal. No. 361). 

Ordered further, That there be 20 minutes for debate on the two nominations, divided equally between the 

Chairman (Mr. Leahy) and the Ranking Member (Mr. Hatch) of the Committee on the Judiciary; that at the 

conclusion, or yielding back of time, the Senate vote on each nomination; that upon the disposition of these 

nominations the President be notified immediately of the Senate's action; and that the Senate return to legislative 

session. 

(September 19, 2001) 
1 

RESOLUTIONS 

CALENDAR Ex.REs REPORTED 

No. No. SUBJECT BY 
2 

TREATIES 

CALENDAR TREATY REPORTED 

No. Doc. No. SUBJECT BY 

I 

1 

I 
3 

NOMINATIONS 

CALENDAR MESSAGE REPORTED 

No No NOMINEE, OFFICE, AND PREDECESSOR BY 

THE JUDICIARY 

360 886 Sharon Prost, ofthe District of Columbia, to be Sep 6, 2001 Reported by Mr. Leahy, 

United States Circuit Judge for the Federal Committee on the Judiciary, 

Circuit, viceS. Jay Plager, retired. without printed report. 

361 903 Reggie B. Walton, of the District of Columb1a, to Sep 6, 2001 Reported by Mr. Leahy, 

be United States District Judge for the District Committee on the Judiciary, 

of Columbia, vice Stanley Spork.in, retired. without printed report. 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

362 958 Deborah J. Daniels, oflndiana, to be an Assistant Sep 6, 2001 Reported by Mr. Leahy, 

Attorney General, vice Laurie 0. Robinson, Committee on the Judiciary, 

resigned. without printed report. 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

* 384 831 Ellen G. Engleman, of Indiana, to be Sep 14, 2001 Senate Committee on 

Administrator of the Research and Special Commerce, Science, and 

Programs Administration, Department of Transportation discharged by 

Transportation, vice Kelley S. Coyner, Unan1mous Consent. 

resigned. 

* 385 830 Kirk Van Tine, ofVirginia, to be General Counsel Sep 14, 2001 Senate Committee on 

ofthe Department of Transportation, vice Commerce, Science, and 

Nancy E. McFadden. Transportation discharged by 

Unanimous Consent. 

* Stgmfies nommee's commitment to respond to requests to appear and testzfy before any duly constituted commzttee of the Senate 
4 

NOMINATIONS PLACED ON THE SECRETARY'S DESK
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### International Trade Administration 

# AGENCY:

International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce. 

# ACTION:

Notice of an open meeting via teleconference. 

# SUMMARY:

The President's Export Council will hold a meeting via teleconference to deliberate a draft recommendation to the President regarding Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation. 

# Date:

November 1, 2006. 

# Time:

2 p.m. (EST). 

# FOR THE CONFERENCE CALL-IN NUMBER AND FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT:

                        The President's Export Council Executive Secretariat, Room 4043, Washington, DC 20230 (Phone: 202-482-1124), or visit the PEC Web site,                         *http://www.export.gov/​pec*.                     

Dated: October 6, 2006. 

J. Marc Chittum, 

Staff Director and Executive Secretary,  President's Export Council. 

[FR Doc. 06-8634 Filed 10-6-06; 2:04 pm] 

BILLING CODE 3510-DR-P
#### § 150.453 ALJ decision.

The ALJ will issue an initial agency decision based only on the record and on applicable law; the decision will contain findings of fact and conclusions of law. The ALJ's decision is final and appealable after 30 days unless it is modified or vacated under § 150.457.
#### Meddaugh, appellant, v. Bigelow.

Appeal from an order granting a new trial on the minutes of the court.

Action by Andrew "Meddaugh against William A. Bigelow to recover an alleged loan of money.

*R. King,*for appellant.

*Collin & Atwell,*for respondent.

Bockes, J., also Miller, P. J.

The court before which the case was tried set aside the verdict for plaintiff, as being against the. preponderance of evidence, and granted a new trial. The order was affirmed on that ground.

*Order affirmed.*
EXHIBIT 31.01
 
 Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification
 
 I, Kenneth E. Steben, certify that:
  1.  I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Sage Fund Limited Partnership;
  2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
  3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
  4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
  a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,  to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
  b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
  c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
  5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
  a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
  b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
 
 Date: August 14, 2009
 
 By:
/s/ Kenneth E. StebenKenneth E. StebenPresident, Chief Executive Officer and Director of the General Partner(Principal Executive Officer)




E-2
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on a nd i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by 9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l y c onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t a bl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. M ARI O ESP ARZA- CR UZ, D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e lla n t. N o. 09- 50150 D. C . No . 3 : 0 8 - C R - 0 3 5 1 3 - L AB ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e S o u th e rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia L a rry A . B urns , D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d A pr i l 5, 2010 ** B efo re: R Y M E R , M cK E O W N , an d P A E Z , C i rcu i tJu d g es. M a r i o E s pa r z a - C ruz appe a l s f r om the 75- m onth s e nt e nc e i m pos e d f ol l ow i ng hi s gui l ty- pl eaconv i ct i on for i m po rt at i on of m etham ph et am i ne, i n v i ol at i on of 

# FI LED APR21 2 010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 50150 2 2 1 U. S . C . § § 9 5 2 , 9 6 0 . We h a v e j u r i s d i c t i o n p u r s u a n tt o 2 8 U. S . C . § 1 2 9 1 , a n d we a f f i r m. E sp arza-C ru z co n t en d s th atth e d i stri ctco u rterred b y d ecl i n i n g t o ap p l y a m i no r r ol e a dj ustm entpu rs uantt o U . S . S . G . § 3 B 1. 2 b ec ause the di stri ctcourtw as i m p ro p erl y i n fl u en ced b y i t s d i sag reem en tw i th p ro secu t o ri al ch arg i n g p o l i ci es. E apa r z a - C ruz a l s o c ont e nds tha the di d notha ve the c ontr ol ove rthe drug s m uggl i ng ope r a t i on r e qui r e d t o pr e c l ude appl i c a t i on of the r ol e a dj us tm e nt . T he di s tr i c tc our tdi d note rra s the r e c or d r e f l e c t s tha tthe di s tr i c tc our t ’ s de ni a l w a s not base d u po n i m prop erconsi dera t i on s. A m on g o ther thi ng s, the di stri ctcourtre l i ed upon the f

a c ttha tE s pa r z a - C ruz w a s a rr e s t e d w i th ove rtw o ki l ogr a m s of m e th a m p h e ta m in e . See U n i t ed S ta t es v. H

u rsh , 21 7 F . 3d 76 1, 77 0 (9t h C i r. 20 00 ); s e e al s o U ni t e d Stat e s v . L ui , 94 1 F . 2d 84 4, 84 9 (9t h C i r. 19 91 ). W e r e je c t E s p a r z a - C ru z ’s c o n te n tio n , r a is e d f o rth e f ir s t tim e in h is r e p ly b r ie f , th a t th e g o v e rn m e n t is ju d ic ia lly e s to p p e d f r o m a r g u in g o n ap p e a l th a t a m i norr ol e a dj us tm e ntw a s unw a rr a nt e d w he n i tha d a dvoc a t e d f ori tdur i ng s e n te n c in g . Se e U

n ite d S ta te s v . B u s s e ll , 50 4 F . 3d 95 6, 96 3 (9t h C i r. 20 07 ). AF F I RME D.
§ 1302.62 Additional services for parents. ( a ) *Parents of all children with disabilities.* ( 1 ) A program must collaborate with parents of children with disabilities, including but not limited to children eligible for services under IDEA, to ensure the needs of their children are being met, including support to help parents become advocates for services that meet their children's needs and information and skills to help parents understand their child's disability and how to best support the child's development;
( 2 ) A program must assist parents to access services and resources for their family, including securing adaptive equipment and devices and supports available through a child's health insurance or other entities, creating linkages to family support programs, and helping parents establish eligibility for additional support programs, as needed and practicable.
( b ) *Parents of children eligible for services under IDEA.* For parents of children eligible for services under IDEA, a program must also help parents: ( 1 ) Understand the referral, evaluation, and service timelines required under IDEA;
( 2 ) Actively participate in the eligibility process and IFSP or IEP development process with the local agency responsible for implementing IDEA, including by informing parents of their right to invite the program to participate in all meetings;
( 3 ) Understand the purposes and results of evaluations and services provided under an IFSP or IEP; and,
( 4 ) Ensure their children's needs are accurately identified in, and addressed through, the IFSP or IEP.
# CongressionalCandidate11a

&"Arial,Bold"&10&KFF0000This table was generated on 5/11/20.
#### § 61.9 Grants to tribal programs. [Reserved]