alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 35 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. CON. RES. 35

Authorizing the use of the rotunda and Emancipation Hall of the Capitol 
    by the Joint Congressional Committee on Inaugural Ceremonies in 
   connection with the proceedings and ceremonies conducted for the 
inauguration of the President-elect and the Vice President-elect of the 
                             United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 2, 2024

 Ms. Klobuchar (for herself and Mrs. Fischer) submitted the following 
       concurrent resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Authorizing the use of the rotunda and Emancipation Hall of the Capitol 
    by the Joint Congressional Committee on Inaugural Ceremonies in 
   connection with the proceedings and ceremonies conducted for the 
inauguration of the President-elect and the Vice President-elect of the 
                             United States.

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF THE ROTUNDA AND EMANCIPATION HALL OF THE CAPITOL.

    The rotunda and Emancipation Hall of the Capitol are authorized to 
be used on January 20, 2025, by the Joint Congressional Committee on 
Inaugural Ceremonies in connection with the proceedings and ceremonies 
conducted for the inauguration of the President-elect and the Vice 
President-elect of the United States.
                                 <all>
```
Date of 

report 

1968 

Apr. 4 

-

Date of report 

1968 

Apr. 4 

4 

4 

4 

~ruatr nf t4r luitr~ ~tatrs NINETIETH CONGRESS 

FIRST SESSION {Co~vened January ro, r967 

Adjourned December 15, 1967 

SECOND SESSION {Convened January rs, 1968 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Prepared under the direction of FRANCIS R. VALEO, Secretary of the Senate 

By GERALD A. HACKETT, Executive Clerk 

Monday, April 8, 1968 

TREATY 

Calendar Treaty No. No. 

SubJect I Action of committee 

1 Ex. L (90th Cong., Protocol of amendment to the Ch11rter of Reported favorably by 

1st sess.) the Organization of American States. Mr. Fulbright, from 

the Committee on 

Foreign Relations, 

with a printed report. 

(See Ex. Rept. No.1, 

90th Cong., 2d sess.) 

NOMINATIONS 

I Predecessor Oalenddr I Message N arne of nommee Office 

No. No. 

DEPARTMENT OF 

DEFENSE 

280 81 J. William Doolittle, of An Assistant Secretary of 

Illinois. the Air Force. 

281 82 William K. Brehm, of An Assistant Secretary of 

Michigan. the Army. 

282 83 Randolph S. Driver, of An Assistant Secretary of 

Pennsylvania. the Navy. 

283 84 Barry James Shillito, of _____ do ___________________ Graeme C. BannerOhio. man, resigned. 

85-022-68-No. 143 
2 

D 

-- -

C ~:udur I Mcosage - - ate of Name of nominee Office Predecessor 

eport No. i No. 

--1----· - U.S. ARMY 

The following-named 

officers to be plt1eed on the 

rctirrd list, in grudcs indicatcd, under the pro-

\"ision~ of title 10, United 

968 State~ Code, sec. 3962: 

Ap r. 4 284 8.3 Gen. Dwight Edw:1rd GeneraL _____________ ___ _ 

Beach, 018747, Army of 

the United St:1tes (majo r 

general, U.S. Army). 

4 284 85 Lt. Gen. Willitcm White Lieutenant generaL ________ 

Dick, Jr., 018384, Army 

of the United States 

(major gcneml, U.S. 

Army). 

4 28-1 85 Lt. Gen. Robert Hackett, _____ do ___________________ 

018380, Army of the 

United States (m:1jor 

general, U.S. Army). 

4 284 8.3 Lt. Gen. Lawrence Joseph _____ do ___________________ 

Lincoln, 018968, Army 

of the United States 

(major getH:ral, U.S. 

Army). 

4 284 8;) Lt. Gen. Edgar Collins _____ do ___________________ 

Doleman, 0191:31, Army 

of the United States 

(major gC'neral, U.S. 

Army). 

The Army National 

Guard of the United 

States officers named herein for promotion as 

I Reserve commissioned 

I 

officers of the Army, 

under provisions of title 

10, United States Code, 

sees. 593(a) and 3392: 

4 28.3 87 Brig. Gen. Joseph Mark l'.!fajor generaL ____________ 

Ambrose, 0460406. 

4 285 87 Brig. Gen. La Vern Erick _____ do ________________ ___ 

Weber, 0963734. 

I 

U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 196 6
§ 1160.3 Definitions. For the purposes of this part: ( a ) *Council* means the Federal Council on the Arts and the Humanities as defined in § 1160.2.
( b ) *Letter of Intent* means an agreement by the Council to provide an indemnity covering a future exhibition subject to compliance with all requirements at the date the indemnity is to be effective.
( c ) *Lender* means the owner of an object.
( d ) *Eligible item* means an object which qualifies for coverage under the Arts and Artifacts Indemnity Act.
( e ) *Exhibition* means a public display of an indemnified items(s) at one or more locations, as approved by the Council, presented by any person, nonprofit agency or institution, or Government, in the United States or elsewhere.
( f ) *On Exhibition* means the period of time beginning on the date an indemnified item leaves the place designated by the lender and ending on the termination date.
( g ) *Indemnity Agreement* means the contract between the Council and the indemnitee covering loss or damage to indemnified items under the authority of the Arts and Artifacts Indemnity Act.
( h ) *Indemnitee* means the party or parties to an indemnity agreement issued by the Council, to whom the promise of indemnification is made.
( i ) *Participating institution(s)* means the location(s) where an exhibition indemnified under this part will be displayed.
( j ) *Termination date* means the date thirty (30) calendar days after the date specified in the indemnity Certificate by which an indemnified item is to be returned to the place designated by the lender or the date on which the item is actually so returned, whichever date is earlier. (In museum terms this means wall-to-wall coverage.) After 11:59 p.m. on the termination date, the item is no longer covered by the indemnity agreement unless an extension has theretofore been requested by the indemnitee and granted in writing by the Council.
# 1984 Executive Calendars

**

----

   The Executive Calendar is published by the Executive Clerk’s office in the Office of the Secretary of the Senate. The calendar is published each day the Senate is in session. These calendars list executive business items such as unanimous consent agreements, resolutions, treaties, and nominations. The calendar is identified by the date published and a volume number, which both appear on the cover of the calendar. A final calendar is published at the end of each session of Congress. For a detailed summary of the sections of the Executive Calendar, see, About the Executive Calendar.
<PAGE>   1
                                                  Exhibit 10.5

                                 AMENDMENT NO. 1
                                       TO
                                   VANS, INC.
                          2000 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN


     The Vans, Inc. 2000 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the "Plan") is hereby amended
as follows:

     1. Section 10.3 of the Plan is hereby amended to delete the words "...such
factors and such circumstances as the Plan Administrator may determine, in its
sole discretion, including but not limited to, ..." in the sixth, seventh and
eighth lines thereof.

     2. Section 11.3 of the Plan is hereby amended to delete the word "and" in
the fourth line thereof and insert the following after the word "Date" in the
fifth line thereof:

          "; (iv) notwithstanding anything else in this Plan to the contrary,
repricing any previously awarded Stock Options by lowering the exercise price
thereof or canceling such Stock Options and subsequently replacing them, or
re-granting such Stock Options with lower exercise prices; (v) notwithstanding
anything else in this Plan to the contrary, granting Restricted Stock awards for
more than an aggregate of 200,000 shares; (vi) notwithstanding anything else in
this Plan to the contrary, granting discounted Nonqualified Stock Options for
more than an aggregate of 200,000 shares; and (vii) increasing the Plan benefits
provided hereunder for Eligible Recipients."

     Except as provided herein, the Plan shall be unmodified and remain in full
force and effect.




Dated:  October 24, 2000
§ 155.1090 Request for reconsideration. ( a ) *Request for reconsideration of denial of certification specific to a Federally-facilitated Exchange* — ( 1 ) *Request for reconsideration.* The Federally-facilitated Exchanges will permit an issuer that has submitted a complete application to a Federally-facilitated Exchange for certification of a health plan as a QHP and is denied certification to request reconsideration of such action.
( 2 ) *Form and manner of request.* An issuer submitting a request for reconsideration under paragraph (a)(1) of this section must submit a written request for reconsideration to HHS, in the form and manner specified by HHS, within 7 calendar days of the date of the written notice of denial of certification. The issuer must include any and all documentation the issuer wishes to provide in support of its request with its request for reconsideration.
( 3 ) *HHS reconsideration decision.* HHS will provide the issuer with a written notice of the reconsideration decision. The decision will constitute HHS's final determination.
( b ) [Reserved]
[81 FR 94180, Dec. 22, 2016]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          12,597
<SECURITIES>                                    35,050
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,343
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (371)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                55,719
<PP&E>                                           4,112
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,910)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  58,344
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,624
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           356
<OTHER-SE>                                      44,333
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    58,344
<SALES>                                          4,407
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,312
<CGS>                                            1,272
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,733
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  55
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,211)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        27
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,238)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.09)


</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

CINCINNATI DIVISION 

NATIONAL REPUBLICAN SENATORIAL 

COMMITTEE, et al., 

 Plaintiffs, 

v. 

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, et al., 

 

Defendant.

No. 1:22-cv-639 

Hon. Douglas R. Cole

PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO CERTIFY QUESTION 

TO THE EN BANC COURT OF APPEALS 

Pursuant to 52 U.S.C. § 30110, Plaintiffs the National Republican Senatorial Committee, 

National Republican Congressional Committee, Senator J.D. Vance, and former Congressman 

Steve Chabot respectfully move this Court to adopt the proposed undisputed facts and certify the 

following question to the en banc U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit: 

Whether the limits on coordinated party expenditures in 52 U.S.C. § 30116 violate 

the First Amendment, either on their face or as applied to party spending in 

connection with “party coordinated communications” as defined in 11 C.F.R. 

§ 109.37. 

This motion is based upon the attached memorandum of law in support of the motion, attached 

declarations and exhibits, matters of which the Court may take judicial notice, and any argument 

the Court may wish to schedule. 

Plaintiffs reserve the right to submit additional proposed facts as may be warranted in 

response to any response to this motion, including proposed facts, by the Defendants. 

Plaintiffs respectfully request that the motion be granted.

Case: 1:22-cv-00639-DRC Doc #: 20 Filed: 05/17/23 Page: 1 of 3 PAGEID #: 215
2 

May 17, 2023 

Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Thomas Conerty 

Noel J. Francisco* 

Donald F. McGahn II* 

John M. Gore* 

E. Stewart Crosland* 

Brinton Lucas* 

Charles E.T. Roberts* 

JONES DAY 

51 Louisiana Avenue, N.W. 

Washington, DC 20001 

Phone: (202) 879-3939 

Fax: (202) 626-1700 

njfrancisco@jonesday.com 

dmcgahn@jonesday.com 

jmgore@jonesday.com 

scrosland@jonesday.com 

blucas@jonesday.com 

cetroberts@jonesday.com 

T. Elliot Gaiser* 

Thomas Conerty 

Bar No. 101619 

JONES DAY 

325 John H. McConnell Boulevard 

Suite 600 

Columbus, OH 43215 

Phone: (614) 469-3939 

Fax: (614) 461-4198 

egaiser@jonesday.com 

tconerty@jonesday.com 

Counsel for Plaintiffs 

*Admitted pro hac vice 

 

Jessica Furst Johnson* 

HOLTZMAN VOGEL BARAN 

TORCHINSKY & JOSEFIAK PLLC 

2300 N Street, N.W. 

Suite 643A 

Washington, DC 20037 

Phone: (202) 737-8808 

Fax: (540) 341-8809 

jessica@holtzmanvogel.com 

Counsel for National Republican 

Senatorial Committee & National 

Republican Congressional Committee 

Case: 1:22-cv-00639-DRC Doc #: 20 Filed: 05/17/23 Page: 2 of 3 PAGEID #: 216
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on May 17, 2023, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of 

Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of this filing to all counsel of record. 

/s/ Thomas Conerty 

Thomas Conerty 

Counsel for Plaintiffs

Case: 1:22-cv-00639-DRC Doc #: 20 Filed: 05/17/23 Page: 3 of 3 PAGEID #: 217
# EUR-Lex - 12008M001 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008M001

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on European Union - TITLE I: COMMON PROVISIONS - Article 1 (ex Article 1 TEU) **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0016 - 0016 *

Article 1

(ex Article 1 TEU) [2]

By this Treaty, the HIGH CONTRACTING PARTIES establish among themselves a EUROPEAN UNION, hereinafter called "the Union" on which the Member States confer competences to attain objectives they have in common.

This Treaty marks a new stage in the process of creating an ever closer union among the peoples of Europe, in which decisions are taken as openly as possible and as closely as possible to the citizen.

The Union shall be founded on the present Treaty and on the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (hereinafter referred to as "the Treaties"). Those two Treaties shall have the same legal value. The Union shall replace and succeed the European Community.

[2] These references are merely indicative. For more ample information, please refer to the tables of equivalences between the old and the new numbering of the Treaties.

--------------------------------------------------
**EXHIBIT 32.01**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

 

Pursuantto 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, the undersigned officer of Entercom Communications Corp. (the “Company”)hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

 

(i)    the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of theCompany for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010 (the “Report”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d),as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(ii)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 
| Date:  November 5, 2010 |                                   |
|------------------------------|----------------------------------------|
|                         |                                   |
|                         |                                   |
| By:                          | /s/  David J. Field                    |   |
| Name:                        | David  J. Field                        |   |
| Title:                       | President  and Chief Executive Officer |   |
|                         | (principal  executive officer)         |   |

 

*A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906has been provided to Entercom Communications Corp. and will be retained by EntercomCommunications Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission orits staff upon request.*

 

----
§ 1110.6 Compliance information. ( a ) *Cooperation and assistance.* The responsible Endowment official shall, to the fullest extent practicable, seek the cooperation of recipients in obtaining compliance with this part and shall provide assistance and guidance to recipients to help them comply voluntarily with this part.
( b ) *Compliance reports.* Each recipient shall keep such records and submit to the responsible Endowment official timely, complete and accurate compliance reports at such times, and in such form and containing such information, as the responsible Endowment official may determine to be necessary to enable him to ascertain whether the recipient has complied or is complying with this part. In the case in which a primary recipient extends Federal financial assistance to any other recipient, such other recipient shall also submit such compliance reports to the primary recipient as may be necessary to enable the primary recipient to carry out its obligations under this part.
( c ) *Access to sources of information.* Each recipient shall permit access by the responsible Endowment official or his designee during normal business hours to such of its books, records, accounts, and other sources of information, and its facilities as may be pertinent to ascertain compliance with this part. Where any information required of a recipient is in the exclusive possession of any other agency, institution or person and this agency, institution or person shall fail or refuse to furnish this information, the recipient shall so certify in its report and shall set forth what efforts it has made to obtain the information.
( d ) *Information to beneficiaries and participants.* Each recipient shall make available to participants, beneficiaries, and other interested persons such information regarding the provisions of this part and its applicability to the program for which the recipient receives Federal financial assistance, and make such information available to them in such manner, as the responsible Endowment official finds necessary to apprise such persons of the protections against discrimination assured them by the Act and this part.
[38 FR 17991, July 5, 1973, as amended at 68 FR 51384, Aug. 26, 2003]
Evaluation of Hardwood vs. Softwood Pellets

Method 5G/28 Particulate Emissions from a Pellet Stove

Prepared by:

James E. Houck, Jeremy Clark, and Thomas Christensen

OMNI Environmental Services, Inc.

13327 NE Airport Way

Portland, OR 97230

November 11, 2009
Summary

The U.S. EPA Method 28 does not specify the type of wood pellets required for the certification 

testing of pellet stoves. It simply states in section 16.1.1, “The test fuel shall be all wood pellets 

with a moisture content no greater than 20 percent on a wet basis (25 percent on a dry basis).” 

OMNI acquired two commercially available pellets, both Pellet Fuels Institute (PFI) premium 

grade pellets, one made of hardwood and one made of softwood. OMNI selected an exempt

pellet stove and tested the two fuel types under identical stove operation (3 burn rates) and 

testing procedures. A comparison of the difference in particulate emissions between the two 

pellet types is shown in Table 1.

Figure 1. Softwood and hardwood pellets used for comparison.
Figure 2. Filters from Method 5G particulate sampling train (see Table 1 for explanation of run 

numbers).

Figure 3. Top-feed pellet stove undergoing testing.
Table 1

Comparison of Particulate Emissions between Hardwood and Softwood Pellets

Fuel Type Run Burn Rate 

Category Burn Rate (Kg/h) Emission Rate (g/h) Emission Factor (g/Kg)

Softwood

1 Low 0.46 1.68 3.65

2 Medium 1.01 0.60 0.59

3 High 1.45 1.25 0.86

Hardwood1

4 Low 0.41 1.40 3.43

5 Medium 1.01 2.34 2.32

6 High 1.48 2.37 1.59

1

The inorganic ash content of the hardwood pellets was determined to be 0.65 percent on an as-received basis. The 

PFI specification for inorganic ash content of premium pellets is 0 - 1 percent.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350








In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ace Marketing & Promotions, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Dean L. Julia, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/S/ DEAN L. JULIADEAN L. JULIACHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERNovember 12, 2010
SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

ONE HUNDRED SECOND CONGRESS 

Convened January 3, 1991 

FIRST SESSION { 

SECOND SESSION { 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Wednesday, July 24, 1991 

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF WALTER J. STEWART, 

SECRETARY OF THE SENATE 

By Gerald A. Hackett, Executive Clerk 
1 

TREATIES 

Calendar Treaty Subject Reported 

No. Doc. No. By 

1 EX. B., Two Related Protocols to the Convention for Feb 5 91 Reported favorably 

95-1 the Unification of Certain Rules Relating by Mr. Pell, Committee on 

to International Carriage by Air, as Foreign Relations, with a 

Amended (Montreal Aviation Protocols No. 3 resolution of advice and 

and 4). consent to ratification 

with provisos. (Printed 

report--Bx. Rept. 102-1 

together with minority 

views).
MEMORANDUM 

DATE: April 23, 2015

TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR–2013-0602

FROM: Angela Hackel, OAQPS 

SUBJECT: April 23, 2015 Meeting with Environmental Groups 

SUMMARY

This meeting was held to discuss a number of rulemakings being conducted within the Office of 

Air Quality Planning and Standards. One of the rulemakings discussed was the Clean Power 

Plan.

ATTENDEES

EPA

 Steve Page, OAQPS

 Mike Koerber, OAQPS

 Peter Tsirigotis, OAQPS

External

 David Baron, Earthjustice

 Paul Cort, Earthjustice

 John Walke, Natural Resources Defense Council 

 Emily Davis, Natural Resources Defense Council 

 Peter Zalzal, Environmental Defense Fund 

 Janice Nolen, American Lung Association 

 Zachary Fabish, Sierra Club