alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 156.937 Submission of briefs and proposed hearing exhibits. ( a ) Within 60 days of its receipt of the acknowledgment provided for in § 156.931, the respondent must file the following with the ALJ: ( 1 ) A statement of its arguments concerning CMS's notice of assessment or decertification (respondent's brief), including citations to the respondent's hearing exhibits provided in accordance with paragraph (a)(2) of this section. The brief may not address factual or legal bases for the assessment or decertification that the respondent did not identify as disputed in its request for hearing or in an amendment to that request permitted by the ALJ.
( 2 ) All documents (including any affidavits) supporting its arguments, tabbed and organized chronologically and accompanied by an indexed list identifying each document.
( 3 ) A statement regarding whether there is a need for an in-person hearing and, if so, a list of proposed witnesses and a summary of their expected testimony that refers to any factual dispute to which the testimony will relate.
( 4 ) Any stipulations or admissions.
( b ) Within 30 days of its receipt of the respondent's submission required by paragraph (a) of this section, CMS will file the following with the ALJ: ( 1 ) A statement responding to the respondent's brief, including the respondent's proposed hearing exhibits, if appropriate. The statement may include citations to CMS's proposed hearing exhibits submitted in accordance with paragraph (b)(2) of this section.
( 2 ) Any documents supporting CMS's response not already submitted as part of the respondent's proposed hearing exhibits, organized and indexed as indicated in paragraph (a)(2) of this section (CMS's proposed hearing exhibits).
( 3 ) A statement regarding whether there is a need for an in-person hearing and, if so, a list of proposed witnesses and a summary of their expected testimony that refers to any factual dispute to which the testimony will relate.
( 4 ) Any admissions or stipulations.
( c ) Within 15 days of its receipt of CMS's submission required by paragraph (b) of this section, the respondent may file with the ALJ a reply to CMS's submission.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 961 

To redesignate the Salem Maritime National Historic Site in Salem, Massachusetts, as the ‘‘Salem Maritime National Historical Park’’, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 23, 2023 

Mr. MARKEY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To redesignate the Salem Maritime National Historic Site 

in Salem, Massachusetts, as the ‘‘Salem Maritime National Historical Park’’, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Salem Maritime Na5 tional Historical Park Redesignation and Boundary Study 

6 Act’’. 

7 SEC. 2. SALEM MARITIME NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK. 

8 (a) REDESIGNATION.—The Salem Maritime National 

9 Historic Site in Salem, Massachusetts, shall be known and 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 961 IS

1 designated as the ‘‘Salem Maritime National Historical 

2 Park’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the national historic site referred to in subsection 

6 (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Salem Mari7 time National Historical Park’’. 

8 SEC. 3. BOUNDARY STUDY. 

9 (a) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

10 (1) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 

11 the Secretary of the Interior. 

12 (2) STUDY AREA.— 

13 (A) IN GENERAL.—The term ‘‘study area’’ 

14 means the city of Salem, Massachusetts, and 

15 the vicinity of that city. 

16 (B) INCLUSIONS.—The term ‘‘study area’’ 

17 includes— 

18 (i) the Salem Armory Visitor Center 

19 building; and 

20 (ii) the park located adjacent to that 

21 building, known as ‘‘Salem Armory Park’’. 

22 (b) STUDY.—The Secretary shall conduct a boundary 

23 study to evaluate the suitability and feasibility of including 

24 in the National Park System, as part of the Salem Mari25 time National Historical Park (as redesignated by section 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•S 961 IS

1 2(a)), any sites and resources located in the study area 

2 that are associated with— 

3 (1) the maritime history of the study area; 

4 (2) coastal defenses of the study area; or 

5 (3) military history of the study area, including 

6 National Guard and militia activity. 

7 (c) REPORT.—Not later than 3 years after the date 

8 on which funds are initially made available to conduct the 

9 study under subsection (b), the Secretary shall submit to 

10 the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the 

11 Senate and the Committee on Natural Resources of the 

12 House of Representatives a report describing— 

13 (1) the results of the study; and 

14 (2) any findings, conclusions, and recommenda15 tions of the Secretary. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 887 

To amend the Federal Reserve Act to prohibit the Federal reserve banks 

from offering certain products or services directly to an individual, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 21, 2023 

Mr. CRUZ (for himself, Mr. BRAUN, and Mr. GRASSLEY) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Reserve Act to prohibit the Federal 

reserve banks from offering certain products or services 

directly to an individual, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON FEDERAL RESERVE BANKS 

4 RELATING TO CERTAIN PRODUCTS OR SERV5 ICES FOR INDIVIDUALS. 

6 Section 13 of the Federal Reserve Act is amended 

7 by adding after the 14th undesignated paragraph (12 

8 U.S.C. 347d) the following: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 887 IS

1 ‘‘No Federal reserve bank may offer products 

2 or services directly to an individual, maintain an ac3 count on behalf of an individual, or issue a central 

4 bank digital currency directly to an individual.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
#### § 902.71 Forms for appeal.

Although no particular written form is prescribed for on appeal, the letter or similar written statement appealing a denial of a record shall contain a description of the record requested, the name and position of the official who denied the request, the reason(s) given for the denial, and other pertinent facts and statements deemed appropriate by the appellant. The Corporation may request additional details if the information submitted is insufficient to support an appeal.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001068148
<NAME> PARK-OHIO INDUSTRIES INC./OH
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           6,269
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  105,750
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,080
<INVENTORY>                                    169,821
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               290,233
<PP&E>                                         203,092
<DEPRECIATION>                                  78,717
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 581,700
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          113,679
<BONDS>                                        287,766
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     150,265
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   581,700
<SALES>                                        358,320
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               358,320
<CGS>                                          293,540
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  293,540
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,071
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 15,591
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,677
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,914
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
# National Alzheimer's Disease Awareness Month, 2006 

During National Alzheimer's Disease Awareness Month, we renew our resolve in the fight against this devastating disease, and we take time to remember the loved ones taken from us by Alzheimer's. We also recognize the patients and family members who are affected by it, and we extend our gratitude to the caretakers and researchers who are pursuing better treatments and a cure. 

Age is the greatest risk factor for Alzheimer's disease, so the need for prevention, improved treatments, and a cure becomes increasingly urgent as more Americans grow older. My Administration is pursuing the tremendous possibilities that science offers to improve the lives of the millions suffering from this disease. We continue to support Alzheimer's disease research through the National Institutes of Health and the Department of Veterans Affairs. New progress is being made as more is learned about this disease. 

America is blessed by our seniors, and they have earned our greatest respect. Citizens living with Alzheimer's disease deserve the best possible care. National Alzheimer's Disease Awareness Month is an opportunity for Americans to offer our support to Alzheimer's patients and those who sacrifice to help them live with dignity and comfort. The strength and compassion of these individuals reflect the good heart of the American people. 

                    NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim November 2006 as National Alzheimer's Disease Awareness Month. I call upon the people of the United States to observe this month with appropriate programs and activities.                           ( print page 64616)    

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this thirtieth day of October, in the year of our Lord two thousand six, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-first. 

[FR Doc. 06-9060

Billing code 3195-01-P
Default - Rule 55A (CO 40 Revised-6/2019) 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT AND BANKRUPTCY COURTS

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Plaintiff(s)

Civil Action: 

v.

Defendant(s)

RE:

DEFAULT

It appearing that the above-named defendant(s) failed to plead or otherwise defend this action though 

duly served on , and an affidavit 

on behalf of the plaintiff having been filed, it is this day of , declared 

that defendant(s) is/are in default.

ANGELA D. CAESAR, Clerk

By: 

Deputy Clerk 

CAMPAIGN LEGAL CENTER 

20-cv-01778-RCL FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

with summons and copy of the complaint 09/19/2020 09 October 2020 /s/Jackie Francis

Case 1:20-cv-01778-RCL Document 13 Filed 10/09/20 Page 1 of 1
September 18, 2015

Mr. Jason M. Smith

J M Smith Engineering, LLC

155 Clarkesville Street

Cornelia, GA 30531

Dear Mr. Smith :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your petition for an exemption from

part 21 ; § § 61.133(a) and (b)

, 91.7(b)

, 91.119

, 91.151(a) and Subpart E (91.401− 91.417) of

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we cannot process your

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can n o t Process Your Request

We received your May 15, 2015

, exemption request on behalf of J M Smith Engineering,

LLC filed in D ocket No

. FAA− 20 15

− 2160 , but we are unable to process y our request any

further. Your petition does no t comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For

us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit

http://aes.faa.go v/petition/index.html . This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal

Aviation A dministration (FAA) requirement outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any

questions you may have.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption

at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267

- 2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure s34
§ 71.9 Establishment of recreation use fees. ( a ) Recreation use fees shall be established by all outdoor recreation administering agencies of the Department of the Interior in accordance with the following criteria: ( 1 ) The direct and indirect cost to the government,
( 2 ) The benefit to the recipient,
( 3 ) The public policy or interest served,
( 4 ) The comparable recreation fees charged by other Federal agencies, non-Federal public agencies and the private sector located within the service area of the management unit at which the fee is charged,
( 5 ) The economic and administrative feasibility of fee collection, and
( 6 ) Other pertinent factors.
( b ) With the approval of the Secretary of the Interior recreation use fees may be established for other types of facilities in addition to those which are listed below.
( c ) Types of recreation facilities for which use fees may be charged:
Tent, trailer and recreation vehicle sites[1] Group camping sites[1, 2] Specialized boat launching facilities and services[3] Lockers Boat storage and handling Elevators Ferries and other means of transportation Bathhouses Swimming pools Overnight shelters Guided tours Electrical hook-ups Vehicle and trailer storage Rental of nonmotorized boats Rental of motorized boats Rental of hunting blinds Reservation services Specialized sites (highly developed) [1] Provided, That in no event shall there be a charge for the use of any campsite and adjacent related facilities unless the campground in which the site is located has all of the following: Tent or trailer spaces, drinking water, access road, refuse containers, toilet facilities, personal collection of the fee by an employee or agent of the bureau operating the facility, reasonable visitor protection, and simple devices for containing a campfire (where campfires are permitted).
[2] The administering agency may establish a group use rate in lieu of the above “Group Camping Sites” recreation use fee in accordance with the criteria set out in this section provided such rate is not less than $3.00 per day per group. Such a group use rate may constitute either a special recreation permit fee or a recreation use fee as determined by the administering agency.
[3] Use fees for boat ramps are prohibited. However, in the case of boat launching facilities with specialized facilities or services, such as mechanical or hydraulic lifts, reasonable fees may be assessed in accordance with the criteria set out in a paragraph (a) of this section.
[45 FR 43168, June 26, 1980. Redesignated at 46 FR 34329, July 1, 1981, and correctly redesignated at 46 FR 43045, Aug. 26, 1981]
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 932 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 932

   To amend title 5, United States Code, to provide for the halt in 
    pension payments for Members of Congress sentenced for certain 
                   offenses, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 22, 2023

    Ms. Rosen (for herself and Mr. Scott of Florida) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
               Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 5, United States Code, to provide for the halt in 
    pension payments for Members of Congress sentenced for certain 
                   offenses, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``No Congressionally Obligated 
Recurring Revenue Used as Pensions To Incarcerated Officials Now Act'' 
or the ``No CORRUPTION Act''.

SEC. 2. FORFEITURE OF PENSION.

    (a) In General.--Section 8332(o) of title 5, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) by redesignating paragraphs (4), (5), and (6) as 
        paragraphs (5), (6), and (7), respectively;
            (2) by inserting after paragraph (3) the following:
    ``(4)(A) Subject to subparagraph (B), an individual convicted of an 
offense described in paragraph (2) shall not be eligible to receive any 
payment of an annuity pursuant to the retirement system under this 
subchapter or chapter 84, except that this sentence applies only to 
such payments based on service rendered as a Member (irrespective of 
when rendered).
    ``(B) If the conviction of an individual described in subparagraph 
(A) is overturned on appeal by a court of competent jurisdiction, the 
individual shall receive payments that the individual would have 
received but for the application of subparagraph (A).
    ``(C) This paragraph applies only to a conviction that occurs after 
the date of enactment of the No Congressionally Obligated Recurring 
Revenue Used as Pensions To Incarcerated Officials Now Act.'';
            (3) in paragraph (5)(B)(i), as so redesignated, by striking 
        ``paragraph (5)'' and inserting ``paragraph (6)''; and
            (4) in paragraph (6), as so redesignated, by striking 
        ``paragraph (4)(B)'' and inserting ``paragraph (5)(B)''.
    (b) Technical and Conforming Amendment.--Section 719(e)(2) of title 
38, United States Code, is amended by striking ``section 8332(o)(5)'' 
and inserting ``section 8332(o)(6)''.
                                 <all>
```
#### H. L. Averill *vs.*Eugene Robinson.

October Term, 1897.

Present: Ross, C. J., Rowell, Tyler, Start and Thompson, JJ.

The cotmty court has discretionary power to set aside a verdict as against the weight of evidence.

General and Special Assumpsit.' Trial by jury at the September Term, 1896, Washington County, *Taft,*J., presiding. Verdict for the plaintiff. The defendant moved to set aside the verdict as against the weight of evidence and contrary to the instructions. The court were of the opinion that the jury either misunderstood the instructions or disregarded them, and set aside the verdict. No evidence was introduced in support of' the motion. The plaintiff ■excepted.

*W. W. LaPoint*and *John IV. Gordon*for the plaintiff.

*Walter E. Barney*for the defendant.

Tyler, J.

There was only-one* question for the jury— whether the defendant gave the plaintiff a written notice of the cancellation of a certain contract — and this question the court submitted to them with proper instructions. A verdict was returned for the plaintiff, whereupon the defendant moved to set it aside upon the grounds that it was contrary to and unsupported by the evidence; that it was against the weight of the evidence; that it was manifestly wrong and,unwarranted and contrary to the instructions. The courf; granted the motion, set the verdict aside and expressed the opinion that the jury had either misunderstood the instructions or disregarded them. This must be construed as equivalent to saying that the verdict was against the weight of the evidence; that if the jury had decided the case by the rule of' the preponderance of the *162evidence, as given them in the instructions, the verdict would have been for the defendant.

While this discretionary power to set aside a verdict and grant a new trial will not be exercised arbitrarily, it is a power incident to all courts which are not controlled by statutes but act in accordance with the principles of the common law. Thompson on Trials, § 2709; 16 Am. & Eng. Enc. of Law 503; *Bartholomew*v. Clark, 1 Conn. 472; *Zaleski*v. *Clark,*45 Conn. 397; *Newton*v. *Brown,*49 Vt. 16.

*Judgment affirmed and cause remanded.*
#### Henry C. Tiffany, Respondent, *v.*John J. Ellis, Appellant, Impleaded with Others.

*Tiffany*v. *Ellis,*121 App. Div. 929, affirmed.

(Submitted January 4, 1909;

decided January 19, 1909.)

Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered October 16, 1907, which affirmed an interlocutory judgment of Special Term overruling a demurrer to the complaint in a stockholder’s action against former officers thereof, alleging fraud and conspiracy and demanding an accounting.

The following questions were certified:

“ 1. Does the amended complaint state a cause of action ?

*“2.*Was the permanent receiver a necessary party to the action ?

“3. Were the trustees of the corporation necessary parties to the action ? ”

*Monroe Wheeler*for appellant.

*James O. Sebring*for respondent.

*540Order affirmed, with costs; first question certified answered in the affirmative, second answered in the negative, and third not answered, as the demurrer does not raise that question; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Edwabd T. Babtlett, Vann, Weeneb, Willabd Babtlett, Hiscock and Chase, JJ.
January 24, 2012

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

JOE GARZON, Appellant

NO. 14-11-00952-CV V.

U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Appellee

____________________

Today the Court heard its own motion to dismiss the appeal from the judgment 

signed by the court below on October 17, 2011. Having considered the motion and found 

it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by JOE 

GARZON.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.