alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# FILED
September 26, 1997 Cecil Crowson, Jr . App ellate C ou rt Clerk IN THE COUR T OF CRIMIN AL APPEALS OF TENN ESSEE

AT KNOXVILLE MAY 1997 SE SSION

ROBERT DALE C HRISTOPHER,) ) Appellant, ) No. 03C01-9608- CC-00306

) ) Cocke County v. ) ) Honorable Re x Henry Ogle, Judg e ) STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) (Post-Conv iction) ) Appellee. ) For the Appell ant : For the Appell ee : Joseph S. Oz ment Charles W. Burson 217 Exchang e Avenue Attorney Gen eral of Tennessee Memphis, TN 38105 and Georgia Bl ythe Felner Assistant Att orney Gener al of Tennessee 450 James Roberts on Parkway Nashvil le, TN 37243-0493 Alfred C. Schmutzer, Sr. Distric t Attorney General 301 Sevier County Courthouse Sevierv ille, TN 37862 and Richard R. Vance Assistant D istrict A

ttorney Gener

al 339A Main Stre et Newport, TN 37821

OPINION FILE D:____________________
AFFIRMED Joseph M. Tipton Judge2 O P I N I O N
The petitioner, R obert Dale C hristopher, appeals as of rig ht from the dismissal of hi s petition for po st-convi ction reli ef by the Cir cuit Court for Cocke County as being unti mely filed. He contends that his petition was timel y under the 1 995 PostConvicti on Procedure Ac t as interpreted in Arnold Cart er v. Stat e , No. 03C01-9509-CC00270, Monroe Co unty (Tenn. C rim. App. Jul y 11, 1996). The trial cour t is affirmed.
The petitioner collaterall y attacks his 1985 conv ictions for thi rd degree burglary and attempt to commit a felony. He filed his petit ion on May 7, 1996. Under this court’ s opinion in Carter , the petition would have been deem ed timely because it was filed w ithin one y ear of the effective date of the 1995 Act. H owever , the Tennessee Supreme Cour t revers ed this court

and concluded that

the 1995 Act did not reinstate a fil ing period for post-conv iction cases relative to convic

tions for w hich the former three-year post-conv iction statut e of limitations had run. Arnold Cart er v. Stat e , No. 03-S-01- 9612-CR-00117, Monroe County (Tenn. Sept. 8, 1997) (for publicat ion). The judgment of the tr ial court i s affirmed.

______________________________ Joseph M. Tipto n, Judge CONCUR:

_____________________________ Joe B. Jo nes, Pre siding Jud ge

_____________________________ Curwood W itt, Jud ge
BILLING CODE: 6715-01-M

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

Sunshine Act Meeting

FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION NOTICE OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT:

87 FR 24162

PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME, DATE, AND PLACE OF THE MEETING:

THURSDAY, APRIL 28, 2022 AT 10:00 A.M.

HYBRID MEETING: 1050 FIRST STREET, N.E. WASHINGTON, D.C. (12TH FLOOR) 

AND VIRTUAL.

CHANGES IN THE MEETING:

The following matter was also considered:

Audit Division Recommendation Memorandum on the UtePAC (A19-07)

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Judith Ingram, Press Officer

Telephone: (202) 694-1220

Authority: Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b

Signed: _____________________________________

Laura E. Sinram 

Acting Secretary and Clerk of the Commission

Submitted: May 2, 2022
#### § 401.10 Monument Trust Fund Program.

Pursuant to the provisions of 36 U.S.C. 2106(d), the Commission operates a Monument Trust Fund Program (MTFP) in countries where there is a Commission presence. Under the MTFP, the Commission may assume both the sponsor's legal interests in the monument and responsibility for its maintenance. To be accepted in the Monument Trust Fund Program, an organization must develop an acceptable maintenance plan and transfer sufficient monies to the Commission to fully fund the maintenance plan for at least 30 years. to The Commission will put this money into a trust fund of United States Treasury instruments that earn interest. Prior to acceptance into the MTFP, the sponsor must perform any deferred maintenance necessary to bring the monument up to a mutually agreeable standard. At that time, the Commission may assume the sponsoring organization's interest in the property and responsibility for all maintenance and other decisions concerning the monument. Once accepted into the program, the Commission will provide for all necessary maintenance of the monument and charge the cost to the trust fund. to The sponsoring organization or others interested in the monument may add to the trust fund at any time to insure that adequate funds remain available. to The Commission will maintain the monument for as long a period as the trust fund account permits.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1303

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1303 appear at 89 FR 67816, Aug. 21, 2024.

#### § 1303.30 Grant recipient responsibility and accountability.

A grant recipient is accountable for the services its delegate agencies provide. The grant recipient supports, oversees and ensures delegate agencies provide high-quality services to children and families and meet all applicable Head Start requirements. The grant recipient can only terminate a delegate agency if the grant recipient shows cause why termination is necessary and provides a process for delegate agencies to appeal termination decisions. The grant recipient retains legal responsibility and authority and bears financial accountability for the program when services are provided by delegate agencies.
#### Philip C. Wchlfarth, Respondent, *v.*George Hilliard, Appellant.

*Wohlfarth v. Hilliard,*115 App. Div. 890, affirmed.

(Argued October 24, 1907;

decided November 19, 1907.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered October 24, 1906, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been caused by defendant’s negligence.

*Henry L. Brant*for appellant.

*Emil Sehneeloeh*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ob. J., Gray, O’Brien, Yann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ.
CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Yanglin Soybean, Inc. (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Shaocheng Xu,
      Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
                September 4, 2008
            By:
            /s/
                SHAOCHENG XUShaocheng
                XuChief
                Financial Officer
SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

ONE HUNDRED SECOND CONGRESS 

Convened January 3, 1991 

FIRST SESSION { Adjourned January 3, 1992 

Convened January 3, 1992 

SECOND SESSION ~ 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Thursday, January 23, 1992 

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF WALTER J. STEWART, 

SECRETARY OF THE SENATE 

By Gerald A. Hackett, Executive Clerk 
1 

TREATIES 

Calendar Treaty Subject Reported 

No. Doc. No. Bv 

1 EX. B., Two Related Protocols to the Convention for Feb 5 91 Reported favorably 

95-1 the Unification of Certain Rules Relating by Mr. Pell, Committee on 

to International Carriage by Air, as Foreign Relations, with a 

Amended (Montreal Aviation Protocols No. 3 resolution of advice and 

and 4). consent to ratification 

with provisos. (Printed 

report--Ex. Rept. 102-1 

together with minority 

views). 
2 

NOMINATIONS 

Calendar Message Nominee, Office, And Predecessor Reported 

* 

* 

* 

No. No. Bv 

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN 

SERVICES 

433 760-1 Arnold R. Tompkins, of Maryland, to be an Nov 20, 91 Mr. Bentsen, 

Assistant Secretary of Health and Human Committee on Finance, 

Services. without printed report. 

474 760-2 Arnold· R. Tompkins, of Maryiand, to be Nov 20, 91 Mr. Bentsen, 

Chief Financial Officer, Department of Committee on Finance, 

Health and Human Services. without printed report. 

Committee on Governmental 

Affairs discharged Nov 25 

91. 

[NEW REPORTS] 

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE 

ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES 

483 773 Kenny Jackson Williams, of North Carolina, Jan 22, 92 Mr. Kennedy, 

to be a Member of the National Council on Committee on Labor and 

the Humanities for a term expiring January Human Resources, without 

26, 1996, vice Mary Josephine Conrad printed report. 

Cresimore. term exoired. .. *S1gmf1es nommee's commitment to respond to requests to appear and testify before any duly 

constituted committee of the Senate.
2012 

Martin 

Dear Mr. Martin 

City of Pelican is aware that our 

to 

Service program. 

Semmens 

City Administrator 

adding a 

Alaska 

seat float 

fleet 

service 

in
#### John T. Hilton, Appellant, *v.*J. Sergeant Cram et al., Respondents.

*Hilton*v. *Cram,*112 App. Div. 35, affirmed.

(Argued November 21, 1907;

decided December 10, 1907.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered April 24, 1906, affirming a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at a Trial Term in an action to recover damages alleged to have been suffered by reason of the wrongful reduction of his compensation as an employee of the dock department in the city of New York.

*Louis Sturcke*for appellant.

*William B.*Ellison, *Corporation Counsel (Theodore Connoly*and *William Beers Crowell*of counsel), for respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.

Concur: Gray, Vann, Werner and Chase, JJ. Dissenting: Cullen, Ch. J., O’Brien and Willard Bartlett, JJ.
#### § 14.56 Concurrence by Federal Highway Administration.

The appropriate State highway department will forward a copy of each application and map filed with the National Park Service to the authorized officer of the Federal Highway Administration for a determination whether the lands and interests in lands are necessary for the purposes of Title 23, United States Code.
###### Editorial Note on Part 7

#### Editorial Note:

The Alphabetical Listing is updated annually by the Office of the Federal Register.

#### § 7.78 Harpers Ferry National Historical Park.

(a) All persons shall register at park headquarters before climbing any portion of the cliff face of Maryland Heights. A registrant shall check out, upon completion of climbing, in the manner specified by the registering official.

[34 FR 8356, May 30, 1969]
BILLING CODE: 6715-01-M 

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

Sunshine Act Meeting

FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION NOTICE OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT:

86 FR 36549

PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME, DATE, AND PLACE OF THE MEETING:

THURSDAY, JULY 15, 2021 AT 10:00 A.M.

VIRTUAL MEETING

CHANGES IN THE MEETING:

The following matter was also considered:

Motion to Amend Directive 68 to Include Additional Information in Quarterly Status 

Reports to Commission

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Judith Ingram, Press Officer

Telephone: (202) 694-1220

Authority: Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b

Signed: _____________________________________

Laura E. Sinram 

Acting Secretary and Clerk of the Commission

Submitted: July 16, 2021
§ 1321.97 Coordination with State, Tribal, and local emergency management. ( a ) *State agencies.* ( 1 ) State agencies shall establish emergency plans, as set forth in section 307(a)(28) of the Act (42 U.S.C. 3027(a)(28)). Such plans must include, at a minimum: ( i ) The State agency's continuity of operations plan and an all-hazards emergency response plan based on completed risk assessments for all hazards and updated annually;
( ii ) A plan to coordinate activities with area agencies on aging, service providers, local emergency response agencies, relief organizations, local governments, State agencies responsible for emergency and disaster preparedness, and any other institutions that have responsibility for disaster relief service delivery;
( iii ) Processes for developing and updating long-range emergency and disaster preparedness plans; and
( iv ) Other relevant information as determined by the State agency.
( 2 ) The plan shall include information describing the involvement of the head of the State agency in the development, revision, and implementation of emergency and disaster preparedness plans, including the State Public Health Emergency Preparedness and Response Plan.
( 3 ) The plan shall discuss coordination with area agencies on aging and service providers and Tribal and local emergency management.
( b ) *Area agencies on aging.* ( 1 ) Area agencies on aging shall establish emergency plans. Such plans must include: ( i ) The area agency's continuity of operations plan and an all-hazards emergency response plan based on completed risk assessments for all hazards and updated annually;
( ii ) A description of coordination activities for both development and implementation of long-range emergency and disaster preparedness plans; and
( iii ) Other information as deemed appropriate by the area agency on aging.
( 2 ) The area agency on aging shall coordinate with Federal, local, and State emergency response agencies, service providers, relief organizations, local and State governments, and any other entities that have responsibility for disaster relief service delivery, as well as with Tribal emergency management, as appropriate.
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 188 (Thursday, September 28, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 56977]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-8325]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK

[Public Notice 91]


Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB 
Review; Comment Request

AGENCY: Export-Import Bank of the U.S.

ACTION: Notice and Request for Comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Export-Import Bank, as a part of its continuing effort to 
reduce paperwork and respondent burden, invites the general public and 
other Federal Agencies to comment on the proposed information 
collection, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. Our 
customers will be able to submit this form electronically. The proposed 
forms may be viewed on our Web site at http://www.exim.gov/pub/ins/pdf/eib92-31_prop.pdf, http://www.exim.gov/pub/ins/pdf/eib92-32_prop.pdf, 
http://www.exim.gov/pub/ins/pdf/eib92-53_prop.pdf, http://www.exim.gov/pub/ins/pdf/eib99-17_prop.pdf.

DATES: Written comments should be received on or before October 30, 
2006 to be assured of consideration.

ADDRESSES: Direct all comments to David Rostker, Office of Management 
and Budget, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, NEOB, Room 
10202, Washington, DC 20503 (202) 395-3897.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Titles and Form Numbers

EIB 92-31 Notification by Insured of Amounts Payable Under Multi-Buyer 
Export Credit Insurance Policy.
EIB 92-32 Notification by Insured of Amounts Payable Under Single-Buyer 
Export Credit Insurance Policy.
EIB 92-53 Small Business Multi-Buyer Export Credit Insurance Policy 
(ENB/ENV) Enhanced Assignment of Policy Proceeds.
EIB 99-17 Single Buyer Export Credit Insurance Policy (ESS/ESSP) 
Enhanced Assignment of Policy Proceeds.

    OMB Numbers: None.
    Type of Review: Regular.
    Need and Use: The information requested allows for the assignment 
of the proceeds of an insurance policy to a financial institution.
    Affected Public: The form affects entities involved in the export 
of U.S. goods and services.
    Estimated Annual Respondents: 170 (new estimate).
    Estimated Responses: 680 (4 originals per respondent).
    Estimated time per Respondent: 10 minutes.
    Estimate Annual Burden: 113.33 hours (new estimate).
    Frequency of Reporting or Use: annually for an enhanced assignment 
and once for the life of a policy for the standard assignment.

    Dated: September 22, 2006.
Solomon Bush,
Agency Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 06-8325 Filed 9-27-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6690-01-M
SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

ONE HUNDRED SECOND CONGRESS 

FIRST SESSION { 

Convened January 3, 1991 

Adjourned January 3, 1992 

Convened January 3, 1992 

SECOND SESSION { 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Wednesday, April 1, 1992 

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF WALTER J. STEWART, 

SECRETARY OF THE SENATE 

By Gerald A. Hackett, Executive Clerk 
1 

TREATIES 

Calendar Treaty Subject Reported 

No. Doc. No. Bv 

1 EX. B., Two Related Protocols to the Convention for Feb 5 91 Reported favorably 

95-1 the Unification of Certain Rules Relating by Mr. Pell, Committee on 

to International Carriage by Air, as Foreign Relations, with a 

Amended (Montreal Aviation Protocols No. 3 resolution of advice and 

and 4). consent to ratification 

with provisos. (Printed 

report--Ex. Rept. 102-1 

together with minority 

views). 

17 EX. E, International Covenant on Civil and Mar 24 92 Reported 

95-2 Political Rights favorably by Mr. Pell, 

Committee on Foreign 

Relations, with a 

resolution of advice and 

consent to ratification 

with reservations, 

understandings, 

declarations and a 

proviso. (Printed 

renort--Ex. Rent. 102-23).
# Party Table 4

&"Arial,Bold"&11&KFF0000This table was published on 4/3/15.

# Sheet2
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

CHRISTOPHER R. DESMOND,

Plaintiff Below,

Appellant,

v.

JEFFREY BULLOCK,

Defendant Below,

Appellee.

§

§ 

§ No. 574, 2018

§

§ Court Below—Superior Court

§ of the State of Delaware

§ 

§ C.A. No. N18M-18-028

§

§

§

Submitted: January 9, 2019

Decided: February 8, 2019

Before STRINE, Chief Justice; VALIHURA and VAUGHN, Justices.

O R D E R

After consideration of the notice to show cause and the appellant’s response,

it appears to the Court that:

(1) On November 14, 2018, the appellant, Christopher R. Desmond, filed 

a notice of appeal from the Superior Court’s denial of his motion to compel the 

Secretary of State to accept his petition for review of his convictions by the Board 

of Pardons. Based on his filing of a number of unsuccessful motions and petitions 

challenging his 1992 convictions, this Court previously directed the Clerk of the 

Court to refuse any filings from Desmond unless the filing was accompanied by the 

required filing fee or a completed motion to proceed in forma pauperis with a sworn 

affidavit containing the certifications required by 10 Del. C. § 8803(e) and that 
2

motion was granted by the Court.1 Desmond filed an incomplete and un-notarized 

motion to proceed in forma pauperis with his notice of appeal. 

(2) The Senior Court Clerk directed Desmond to provide a completed and 

notarized motion by November 29, 2018. Desmond failed to do so. On December 

31, 2018, the Superior Court directed Desmond to show cause why this appeal 

should not be dismissed for his failure to file a completed and notarized motion to 

proceed in forma pauperis as directed. On January 9, 2019, Desmond filed his 

response to the notice to show cause. 

(3) Although it is not entirely clear, Desmond seems to argue that members 

of the Court have been found to be appointed unconstitutionally. Desmond does not 

address his failure to file a completed and notarized motion to proceed in forma 

pauperis as directed by the Court. Nor has he paid the filing fee. Under these

circumstances, this appeal must be dismissed.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is DISMISSED. 

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Leo E. Strine, Jr.

Chief Justice 

 

1 Desmond v. Biden, 2015 WL 631582, at *3 (Del. Feb. 11, 2015).
[No. 4082.]

#### Jeff Cain *v.*The State.

Theft—Evidence.—See the opinion for the substance of evidence adduced upon a trial for theft *held*insufficient to support a conviction, because, under the circumstances of the case, it fails to establish a fraudulent intent at the time of the taking.

Appeal from the District Court of Travis. Tried below before the Hon. A. S. Walker.

The conviction in this case was for the theft of a locket and necklace, of value exceeding twenty dollars, the property of Mary Marshall, in Travis county, Texas, on the tenth day of December, 1883. A term of three years in the penitentiary was the penalty awarded by the jury.

The opinion sufficiently discloses the case.

*Walker Moore*and *Robert G-. West,*for the appellant.

*J. H. Burts,*Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Hurt, Judge.

This is a conviction for theft. The material facts in evidence were that the prosecuting witness, the alleged owner of the stolen property, had for some time served the defendant in the capacity of mistress, they living together as man and wife. They came to Austin together. After reaching Austin they did not live together. The witness had a room at a hotel in the city. In the month of August or September, defendant visited her in that room. They disagreed about the witness going to a place called “Pressler’s garden.” The property (a locket and chain) was lying on the table in the room: The defendant took it, as he said, to prevent the witness going to the garden. The witness did not consent to the taking. She repeatedly asked the defendant for it, he giving some excuse for not returning it. In December following he sold the articles to a pawn broker, claiming to be the owner. The pawn broker kept them about a year, and sold them to another pawn broker, from whom they were recovered by the witness in an action at law. When informed that this action was pending, the defendant *663claimed ownership, and promised that evidence should be forthcoming to prove his claim, but failed to produce the evidence. The indictment was presented November 28, 1885.

Opinion delivered June 25, 1886.

The learned trial judge charged the jury that, “if the jury are not satisfied from the testimony that the taking was fraudulent, they will acquit. And, if the testimony should show that the defendant took the property only to keep said Mary Marshall from attending at Pressler’s garden, then they, will acquit the defendant.” This was the law of the case, and the question, under the rule thus announced, was, is the evidence sufficient to warrant the conclusion arrived at by the jury, that, at the time of the taking, the fraudulent intent existed in the mind of the defendant? Taking into consideration the relations of the parties and the length of time which elapsed from the date of the taking, and • the time of the conversion, we are not satisfied to let this conviction stand.

Because the evidence is insufficient to show a fraudulent intent *jj*at the time of the taking, the judgment is reversed and thev cause remanded. *li*

*Reversed and remanded.*
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

Bilingual EducationClassroom TechniquesCooperative LearningElementary EducationEnglish (Second Language)Language ProficiencyLiteracy EducationSecond Language LearningSpanishSpanish Speaking

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget