alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1



Certification of Chief Executive Officer



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of
ACLARA BioSciences, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



(i)  the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(ii)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Dated: August 14, 2003 |  | /s/    THOMAS G. KLOPACK
|---------------------- |  | ------------------------
|                       |  | Thomas G. Klopack       
|                       |  | Chief Executive Officer 



The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into
any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
1 

### Daniels, Nia (FAA)

From: Daniels, Nia (FAA)

Sent: Friday, February 20, 2015 11:57 AM

To: 'kevin.gould@hawkaerial.com'

Cc: Pappas, Rob (FAA); Schandler, Andrea (FAA) ; Cooper, Thuy (FAA); Pearson, Lakisha

(FAA) Subject: Request for Additional Information



### February 20, 2015

Mr. Kevin J. Gould

CEO Hawk Aerial, LLC

114 Homesteads Road Placitas, NM 87043

Dear Mr. Gould:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA2014-1023). This information is necessary for the Fe deral Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

 Describe the aircraft makes and models for th e proposed UAS operation. The descriptions should include the following: size and ai rcraft type (i.e. - fixed-wing , rotorcraft, lighter-than-air).

 Provide information regarding the pr oposed systems for navigational guida nce. This information can be

located in the aircraft manual.

 Provide information regarding the pr oposed Loss Link Procedures. This information can be located in

the aircraft manual.

 Provide information regarding the pr oposed Flight Termination System (FTS). This information can be

located in the aircraft manual.

 Your petition references the materials listed below, however the materials were not submitted for the record. Please provide a copy of the following referenced materials:

o Manufacturer’s aircraft manua ls and operation guidelines2 

### Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any proprietary information to the FAA Hea dquarters or electronically via e-mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov . If you want us to process your request a ny further, we must receive the information described above by March 6, 2015. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

Nia Daniels Program Analyst

Nia Daniels, ARM

‐ 108

Federal Aviation Administration

Office of Rulemaking, Airmen & Airspace Rules Division

800 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20591

PH: (202) 267 ‐ 7626

Fax: (202) 267 ‐ 5075 nia.daniels@faa.gov
#### William T. Dwire, appellant, v. W. M. Gentry et al., appellees.

Filed January 30, 1914.

No. 17,538.

Limitations of Actions: Principal and Surety: Payment by Principal. The payment of interest on a note by a principal without the authority, knowledge or consent of the surety will not stop the running of the statute of limitations as to the surety.

Appeal from the district court for Lancaster county: Albert J. Cornish, Judge. '

*Affirmed.*

*George A.*Adams, for appellant.

*Moclcett &*Peterson, *contra.*

Letton, J.

Appellant states his case thus: “This case was brought upon a promissory note. The defendant Gentry was not found and no proceedings were had against him. The defendant Watkins answered, among other things, the statute of limitations, and that he was surety for Gentry. The evidence shows, and there is no controversy upon that proposition, that Watkins was surety for Gentry; that Gentry made several payments upon the note without the knowledge or consent of Watkins, and that the statute of limitations had not run after the last payment by Gentry. So the question raised, and the only question, is, did the payments of interest by the principal keep the note alive *151as to the surety?” He relies upon section 22 of the code (Rev. St. 1913, sec. 7579). While there is a conflict in the courts of other states upon this question (33 Century Digest, Limitation of Actions, sec. 624) the greater weight of authority is in accordance with the holding of this court in the cases of *Mayberry v. Willoughby,*5 Neb. 368; *Stevenson v. Craig,*12 Neb. 464; *Moffitt v. Carr,*48 Neb. 403; *Omaha Savings Bank v. Simeral,*61 Neb. 741; *Teegarden v. Burton,*62 Neb. 639; *McLaughlin v. Senne,*78 Neb. 631.

While the facts in all of these cases are not' identical, the decision in each rests upon the principles announced in the *Mayberry*case. This was an action upon a note signed by a partnership in the firm name. The point in question was considered at length, and it was held that after the dissolution of the partnership the relation of the partners to creditors then became that of joint debtors; that a promise by one joint debtor will not take a debt out of the statute of limitations as to his cocontractors unless he is specially and severally authorized for that purpose; that the statute of limitations is one of repose, and that when the time limited by it has expired then in legal contemplation the debt is extinguished, and can only be revived by a new promise by the person sought, to be charged or by some person lawfully authorized by him for that purpose.

The *Simeral*case is almost exactly in point. “The note matured December 18,1887, and the cross-petition was filed eight years, eight months and four days thereafter. No payments were made on the note by Redick. Simeral, the principal on the note, made several payments, which were without the knowledge or consent of Redick, the surety. The payments so made did not toll the statute as to Redick.”

We are content to follow the beaten track. The judgment of the district court is

Affirmed.

Barnes, Rose and Sedgwicic, JJ., not sitting.
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20463 

August 19, 2020 

MEMORANDUM 

TO: Patricia C. Orrock 

Chief Compliance Officer 

Joshua Blume 

Attorney 

Lorenzo Holloway 

Assistant General Counsel 

Compliance Advice 

FROM: Neven F. Stipanovic 

Associate General Counsel 

Policy Division 

Dayna C. Brown 

Acting Assistant Staff Director 

Audit Division 

SUBJECT: Interim Audit Report on the National Tooling & Machining Association 

Committee for a Strong Economy (LRA 1111) 

The Office of the General Counsel has reviewed the proposed Interim Audit Report 

(“IAR”) on the National Tooling & Machining Association Committee for a Strong Economy. 

The IAR contains two findings: Misstatement of Financial Activity – Increased Activity 

(Finding 1) and Disclosure of Contributions Made to Federal Candidate (Finding 2). We 

concur with the findings. If you have any questions, please contact Joshua Blume, the attorney 

assigned to this audit.
SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

ONE HUNDRED SIXTH CONGRESS 

FIRST SESSION { CONVENEDJANUARY6, 1999 

SECOND SESSION { 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Tuesday, February 2, 1999 

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF GARY SISCO, 

SECRETARY OF THE SENATE 

By Michelle Haynes, Executive Clerk 
1 

RESOLUTIONS 

i 

CALENDAR Ex.RES REPORTED 

No. No. SUBJECT BY 
2 

TREATIES 

CALENDAR 

I 

TREATY REPORTED 

No Doc No SUBJECT BY 
3 

NOMINATIONS 

CALENDAR MESSAGE REPORTED 

No. No. NOMINEE, OFFICE, AND PREDECESSOR BY 

EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT 

* 1 1-15 Susan G. Esserman, of Maryland, to be Deputy Jan 22,99 Reported by Mr. Roth, 

United States Trade Representative, with the Committee on Finance, without 

rank of Ambassador, vice Jeffrey M. Lang, printed report. 

resigned. 

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 

* 2 1-18 Timothy F. Geithner, of New York, to be an Jan 22,99 Reported by Mr. Roth, 

Under Secretary of the Treasury, vice David A. Committee on Finance, without 

Lipton. printed report. 

* 3 1-19 Gary Gensler, of Maryland, to be an Under Jan 22,99 Reported by Mr. Roth, 

Secretary of the Treasury, vice John D. Committee on Finance, without 

Hawke, Jr. printed report. 

* 4 3-5 Edwin M. Truman, of Maryland, to be a Deputy Jan 22,99 Reported by Mr. Roth, 

Under Secretary of the Treasury, vice Timothy Committee on Finance, without 

F. Geithner. printed report. 

i 

*Signifies nominee's commitment to respond to requests to appear and testify before any duly constituted committee of the Senate 
4 

NOMINATIONS PLACED ON THE SECRETARY'S DESK
§ 1184.5 How will my request be processed? ( a ) *Acknowledgment of requests.* IMLS will assign a tracking number to your request and will, as soon as practicable, advise you in writing of this tracking number, and, as appropriate, a brief description of the request, and relevant IMLS contact information, including the name and contact information of the FOIA Public Liaison.
( b ) *Clarifications.* If there is any uncertainty, IMLS will attempt to communicate with you to clarify the scope of your request.
( c ) *Estimated dates of completion and interim responses.* Upon request, IMLS will provide an estimated date by which the agency expects to provide a response to the requester. If a request involves a voluminous amount of material, or searches in multiple locations, IMLS may provide interim responses, releasing the records on a rolling basis.
( d ) *Referrals of requests.* Whenever IMLS refers all or any part of the responsibility for responding to a request to another agency, IMLS will notify you of the name of the agency to which the request has been referred.
( e ) *Grants of requests.* When responsive records are located, IMLS will apply a presumption of disclosure and openness. If IMLS decides to grant your request in whole or in part, the agency will notify you in writing. The notice will include any applicable fee and the agency will disclose records to you promptly upon payment of applicable fees. IMLS will mark or annotate any records disclosed in part to show the amount, the location, and the FOIA exemptions under which the redaction is made, unless doing so would harm an interest protected by an applicable exemption.
( f ) *Denials of requests.* Denials of your FOIA request, either whole or in part, will be made in writing by the FOIA Public Liaison. IMLS will inform you of the reasons for the denial, including any FOIA exemption(s) applied by the agency in denying the request, and notify you of your right to appeal the determination as described in § 1184.6. IMLS will, as appropriate, provide a brief description of the information being withheld. In addition, IMLS will provide information about the mediation services provided by the Office of Government Information Services of the National Archives and Records Administration.
[79 FR 9423, Feb. 19, 2014, as amended at 84 FR 22946, May 21, 2019]
EXHIBIT 10.50
TANDY BRANDS ACCESSORIES, INC.
FISCAL 2010 COMPENSATION SUMMARIES
   FISCAL 2010 EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION SUMMARY
 BaseExecutive Officer
    
    SalaryN. Roderick McGeachy, III, Chairman of the Board,(1)President, and Chief Executive Officer
    
    $
    330,000M.C. Mackey, Chief Financial Officer, Teasurer, and Assistant Secretary
    
    $
    216,300Robert J.
McCarten, Senior Vice President - Sales
    
    $
    215,000
 
 (1) - Mr. McGeacy does not receive compensation for serving as a director or Chairman of the Board.
 FISCAL 2010 NONEMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION SUMMARY
 Board and CommitteeMeeting FeesAnnual Retainer
    
    Per Meeting
    
    Shares of Restricted Stock (A)Board Member
    
    
    
    
    
    Audit Committee
    
    Continuing Board Member
    
    
    3,000(other than
    
    
    
    
    
    $2,000Lead Independent Director
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    New Board Member
    
    
    4,060and Chairman of the Board)
    
    $
    25,000
    
    
    Board and OtherCommittees
    
    Nonemployee ChairmanAudit Committee
    
    
    
    
    
    $1,500 in person
    
    of the Board
    
    
    4,200Chairperson
    
    $
    7,500
    
    
    $750 telephonicOther CommitteeChairpersons
    
    $
    5,000Lead Independent Director
    
    $
    50,000
 
 (A) - Awards pursuant to the Tandy Brands Accessories, Inc. 2002 Omnibus Plan, as amended June 6,
2007.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.1

            Form of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock Certificate


   NUMBER                                                              SHARES

     1                                                                1,059,322

               INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

                               MEDIAX CORPORATION

                      Series A Convertible Preferred Stock


THIS CERTIFIES THAT ************CTI II LIMITED********************** is the
owner of ****************One Million Fifty Nine Thousand Three Hundred
Twenty-Two ************** shares of fully paid and non-assessable shares of the
Series A Convertible Preferred Stock of MediaX Corporation transferable only on
the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person or by its duly
authorized Attorney upon surrender of the Certificate properly endorsed.

In Witness Whereof, the said Corporation has caused this Certificate to be
signed by its duly authorized officers and to be sealed with the Seal of the
Corporation this _____ day of November A.D. 2000


--------------------------                           --------------------------
                 SECRETARY                                            PRESIDENT
<PAGE>   2

                                   STOCK POWER

For Value Received, the undersigned hereby sell, assign and transfer to:


--------------------------------

--------------------------------

--------------------------------

__________________ shares of the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock of MediaX
Corporation represented by certificate(s) No(s). ______________ inclusive,
standing in the name of the undersigned on the books of said Company.

The undersigned does hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint
______________________________ attorney to transfer said stock on the books of
said Company, with full power of substitution in the premises.

IMPORTANT: The signatures to this stock power must correspond with the name(s)
as written upon the face of the certificate(s) in every particular without
alteration.

                                            Signature:
                                                      --------------------------
                                            Name:
                                                 -------------------------------
                                            Tax Id. No.:
                                                        ------------------------

                                            Dated:
                                                  ------------------------------
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO § 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Private Media Group, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Report”), Berth Milton, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Johan Gillborg, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that: 

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

/s/ Berth Milton

 

Berth Milton 

Chief Executive Officer 

May 12, 2008 

/s/ Johan Gillborg 

 

Johan Gillborg 

Chief Financial Officer 

May 12, 2008 

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 899 

To prohibit the Federal Government from mandating vaccination against 

COVID–19 for interstate travel. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 21, 2023 

Mr. LEE (for himself, Mr. BRAUN, and Mr. SULLIVAN) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To prohibit the Federal Government from mandating 

vaccination against COVID–19 for interstate travel. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Let Me Travel America 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON AUTHORITY OF SURGEON GEN7 ERAL. 

8 Section 361 of the Public Health Service Act (42 

9 U.S.C. 264) is amended by adding at the end the fol10 lowing: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 899 IS

1 ‘‘(f) Nothing in this section shall be construed to pro2 vide the Surgeon General, the Secretary of Health and 

3 Human Services, or any Federal agency with the authority 

4 to mandate vaccination against Coronavirus Disease 2019 

5 (COVID–19) as a prerequisite for interstate travel, trans6 portation, or movement.’’. 

7 SEC. 3. INTERSTATE COMMON CARRIERS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 805 of title 49, United 

9 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol10 lowing: 

11 ‘‘§ 80505. COVID–19 vaccination status 

12 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—An entity described in subsection 

13 (b) may not deny service to any individual solely based 

14 on the vaccination status of the individual with respect 

15 to the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID–19). 

16 ‘‘(b) ENTITY DESCRIBED.—An entity referred to in 

17 subsection (a) is a common carrier or any other entity, 

18 including a rail carrier (as defined in section 10102, in19 cluding Amtrak), a motor carrier (as defined in section 

20 13102), a water carrier (as defined in that section), and 

21 an air carrier (as defined in section 40102), that— 

22 ‘‘(1) provides interstate transportation of pas23 sengers; and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 899 IS

1 ‘‘(2) is subject to the jurisdiction of the Depart2 ment of Transportation or the Surface Transpor3 tation Board under this title. 

4 ‘‘(c) SAVINGS PROVISION.—Nothing in this section 

5 applies to the regulation of intrastate travel, transpor6 tation, or movement, including the intrastate transpor7 tation of passengers.’’. 

8 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The analysis for chap9 ter 805 of title 49, United States Code, is amended by 

10 inserting after the item relating to section 80504 the fol11 lowing: 

‘‘80505. COVID–19 vaccination status.’’. 

12 SEC. 4. RULE OF CONSTRUCTION. 

13 Nothing in this Act, or an amendment made by this 

14 Act, shall be construed to permit or otherwise authorize 

15 Congress or an executive agency to enact or otherwise im16 pose a COVID–19 vaccine mandate. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Did not mail Pb designation letter to IA Governor. IA submitted their designation 

recommendations before EPA sent the letters to the Governors. We discussed with 

IDNR, and resolved to not send the letter to IA’s governor, but instead emailed Jim 

McGraw of IDNR the Harnett memo and timeline attachment, on 9/25/09.

------------------------------------

Hello,

As discussed on the Sept 22 call, EPA received Iowa's Pb NAAQS designation recommendation 

on Sept 17, 2009. Since we have already received your recommendation, we will not be sending 

a Pb NAAQS designations process letter to the Governor. Instead, as agreed to on the call, we 

are emailing you the guidance memo from Bill Harnett. It contains additional information 

regarding future Pb NAAQS actions and timelines.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 621 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 621

  To amend the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008 to clarify 
propane storage as an eligible use for funds provided under the storage 
             facility loan program, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 2, 2023

  Ms. Ernst (for herself and Ms. Klobuchar) introduced the following 
      bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                  Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008 to clarify 
propane storage as an eligible use for funds provided under the storage 
             facility loan program, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. STORAGE FACILITY LOANS.

    Section 1614(a) of the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008 
(7 U.S.C. 8789(a)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``funds for producers'' and inserting the 
        following: ``funds for--
            ``(1) producers''; and
            (2) in paragraph (1) (as so designated), by striking the 
        period at the end and inserting the following: ``; or
            ``(2) agricultural producers to construct or upgrade 
        storage facilities for propane that is primarily used for 
        agricultural production (as such term is defined in section 
        4279.2 of title 7, Code of Federal Regulations (as in effect on 
        the date of the enactment of this paragraph)).''.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7330

LLOYD GEORGE MAXWELL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern

District of West Virginia, at Beckley. David A. Faber, District

Judge. (CA-98-580-5)

Submitted: February 11, 1999 Decided: February 24, 1999

Before ERVIN, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lloyd George Maxwell, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Lloyd George Maxwell appeals the district court’s order dismissing his action seeking return of property under Fed. R. Crim.

P. 41(e). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant Maxwell’s motion

to proceed in forma pauperis, but affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. See United States v. Maxwell, No. CA-98-580-5

(S.D.W. Va. Aug. 7, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED