alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 987 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 987

 To expand the HERO Child-Rescue Corps Program, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 27, 2023

Ms. Klobuchar (for herself, Mr. Scott of Florida, Mr. Peters, and Mrs. 
    Capito) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To expand the HERO Child-Rescue Corps Program, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Providing Resources for Exceptional 
Veterans to End Narcotic Trafficking of Fentanyl Act'' or the ``PREVENT 
Fentanyl Act''.

SEC. 2. EXPANSION OF THE HERO CHILD-RESCUE CORPS.

    Section 890A of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 473) is 
amended--
            (1) by striking ``Child-Rescue'' each place it appears; and
            (2) in subsection (e)--
                    (A) in the subsection heading, by striking ``HERO 
                Child-Rescue Corps'' and inserting ``HERO Corps 
                Program'';
                    (B) in paragraph (1)(B), by inserting ``, as 
                relevant'' after ``participants'';
                    (C) in paragraph (2), by inserting ``and fentanyl 
                trafficking'' after ``child exploitation'';
                    (D) in paragraph (3)--
                            (i) in the matter preceding subparagraph 
                        (A), by inserting ``Corps'' before ``Program''; 
                        and
                            (ii) in subparagraph (B)--
                                    (I) in clause (v), by striking 
                                ``and'';
                                    (II) in clause (vi), by striking 
                                the period at the end and inserting ``; 
                                and''; and
                                    (III) by adding at the end the 
                                following:
                            ``(vii) fentanyl trafficking.''; and
                    (E) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(4) Limitation.--Investigations and analysis described in 
        paragraph (3)(B)(vii) may not make up more than 40 percent of 
        the investigations and analysis conducted by participants of 
        the HERO Corps Program.''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 218 (Monday, November 13, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66170-66171]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9185]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Memorandum of Understanding Between the United States Fish and 
Wildlife Service, Department of the Interior, and the Department of 
Energy Regarding Implementation of Executive Order 13186, 
``Responsibilities of Federal Agencies to Protect Migratory Birds''

AGENCIES: Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of availability of Memorandum of Understanding.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Energy (DOE) and the Department of the 
Interior (DOI), United States Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) have 
entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), effective August 3, 
2006. The purpose of the MOU is to address how both Parties may 
cooperatively handle migratory bird protection and conservation in 
accordance with the requirements of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act 
(MBTA) and Executive Order (EO) 13186.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Stirling, U.S. Department of 
Energy, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW. (Room 3G-092), Washington, DC 
20585, 202-586-2417.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The MOU addresses how DOE and DOI may 
cooperatively handle migratory bird protection and conservation and 
ensure that DOE operations are consistent with the requirements of the 
Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and Executive Order (EO) 13186, 
``Responsibilities of Federal Agencies to Protect Migratory Birds.'' EO 
13186 specifically directs Federal agencies whose actions have, or are 
likely to have, a measurable negative impact on migratory bird 
populations, to incorporate migratory bird conservation measures into 
their activities. The MOU serves to strengthen migratory bird 
protection and conservation through enhanced collaboration between DOE 
and FWS, and fulfills DOE's obligation under EO 13186.
    The MOU identifies specific areas in which cooperation between DOE 
and FWS will substantially contribute to the conservation and 
management of migratory birds and their habitats. The MOU establishes 
protocols to provide the necessary guidance for DOE to incorporate 
migratory bird protection and conservation more fully into it's 
programs in accordance with EO requirements.
    The complete text of this MOU is available for view on the 
following Department of Energy Web site: http://www.eh.doe.gov/oepa/data.

[[Page 66171]]

    Issued at Washington, DC, October 30, 2006.
Andrew C. Lawrence,
Director, Office of Nuclear Safety and Environment, Office of Health, 
Safety and Security, U.S. Department of Energy.
[FR Doc. 06-9185 Filed 11-9-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-M
```
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 81 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

<DOC>

                                                         Calendar No. 5
118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 81

To provide a moratorium on all Federal research grants provided to any 
  institution of higher education or other research institute that is 
                 conducting gain-of-function research.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 25, 2023

 Mr. Marshall (for himself, Mr. Paul, Ms. Ernst, Mr. Tuberville, Mrs. 
  Blackburn, Mr. Braun, Mr. Lankford, Mr. Rubio, Mr. Cotton, and Mr. 
  Wicker) introduced the following bill; which was read the first time

                            January 26, 2023

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide a moratorium on all Federal research grants provided to any 
  institution of higher education or other research institute that is 
                 conducting gain-of-function research.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Viral Gain-of-Function Research 
Moratorium Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON FEDERAL RESEARCH GRANTS FOR INSTITUTIONS AND 
              RESEARCH INSTITUTES CONDUCTING GAIN-OF-FUNCTION RESEARCH.

    (a) Definition of Gain-of-Function Research.--In this section, the 
term ``gain-of-function research'' means any research that--
            (1) could confer attributes to influenza, MERS, or SARS 
        viruses such that the virus would have enhanced pathogenicity 
        or transmissibility in any organism; or
            (2) involves methods that could enhance potential pandemic 
        pathogens or related risky research with potentially dangerous 
        pathogens.
    (b) Prohibition.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no 
research grants supported by Federal funds may be awarded to 
institutions of higher education, or other research institutes, that 
are conducting gain-of-function research.
                                                         Calendar No. 5

118th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 81

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

To provide a moratorium on all Federal research grants provided to any 
  institution of higher education or other research institute that is 
                 conducting gain-of-function research.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            January 26, 2023

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar
```
§ 1330.5 Stages of development. For any Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research Projects and Centers Program competition, the Department may require in the notice inviting applications for the competition that the applicant identify the stage(s) of development in which it will focus the work of its proposed project or center. The three stages of development are: ( a ) *Proof of concept* means the stage of development where key technical challenges are resolved. Stage activities may include recruiting study participants, verifying product requirements; implementing and testing (typically in controlled contexts) key concepts, components, or systems, and resolving technical challenges. A technology transfer plan is typically developed and transfer partner(s) identified; and plan implementation may have started. Stage results establish that a product concept is feasible.
( b ) *Proof of product* means the stage of development where a fully-integrated and working prototype, meeting critical technical requirements is created. Stage activities may include recruiting study participants, implementing and iteratively refining the prototype, testing the prototype in natural or less-controlled contexts, and verifying that all technical requirements are met. A technology transfer plan is typically ongoing in collaboration with the transfer partner(s). Stage results establish that a product embodiment is realizable.
( c ) *Proof of adoption* means the stage of development where a product is substantially adopted by its target population and used for its intended purpose. Stage activities typically include completing product refinements; and continued implementation of the technology transfer plan in collaboration with the transfer partner(s). Other activities include measuring users' awareness of the product, opinion of the product, decisions to adopt, use, and retain products; and identifying barriers and facilitators impacting product adoption. Stage results establish that a product is beneficial.
§ 153.270 HHS audits of State-operated reinsurance programs. ( a ) *Audits.* HHS or its designee may conduct a financial and programmatic audit of a State-operated reinsurance program to assess compliance with the requirements of this subpart or subpart B of this part. A State that establishes a reinsurance program must ensure that its applicable reinsurance entity and any relevant contractors, subcontractors, or agents cooperate with any audit under this section.
( b ) *Action on audit findings.* If an audit results in a finding of material weakness or significant deficiency with respect to compliance with any requirement of this subpart or subpart B, the State must ensure that the applicable reinsurance entity: ( 1 ) Within 60 calendar days of the issuance of the final audit report, provides a written corrective action plan to HHS for approval;
( 2 ) Implements that plan; and
( 3 ) Provides to HHS written documentation of the corrective actions once taken.
[79 FR 13835, Mar. 11, 2014]
[No. 1398.]

#### Debord v. Johnson.

Stock Brand — Prima Eacie Evidence of Ownership.

A stock brand duly recorded is *prima facie*evidence of ownership of an animal upon which it is found, but may be overcome by other evidence of ownership.

*Appeal from the County Court of Custer County.*

Mr. H. Townsend and Mr. John R. Smith, for appellant.

Mr. J. G. Schweigert, for appellee.

Thomson, P. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

Replevin by appellant against appellee for a cow. Non-suit against, and appeal by, plaintiff.

The plaintiff was an infant, and sued by her next friend, Ida W. Debord. The evidence was that the plaintiff’s father, Albert M. Debord, had for a number of years been in. charge, as manager, of a farm and herd of cattle belonging to Dr. W. A. Bell; that while he had charge of the farm and cattle, two cows were given to the plaintiff, one with Jersey blood, and one, part Devon, and part Hereford. Dr. Bell’s brand was “ C. F.,” and the plaintiff’s father used that brand on these *403two cows to avoid a diversity of brands on tbe same farm, notifying Dr. Bell that the cows were the plaintiff’s; that Debord was succeeded, as manager, by the defendant, and left the farm with his family; that the defendant afterwards delivered the Jersey cow to the plaintiff, but refused to surrender the other; that the plaintiff permitted the cows to remain with the defendant for some little time after her father had left the farm, and the defendant charged, and was paid, pasturage for both, his receipted bill for such pasturage being in evidence; and that the cow in controversy was one of those same cows. Upon this evidence the court, on motion of the defendant, granted a nonsuit, and rendered judgment against the plaintiff for the return of the property or the payment of its value.

The reasons which influenced the court in its action do not appear in the record, and the argument of the defendant’s counsel does not indicate very satisfactorily what his contention really is. Unless it is that Mr. Debord, by using the brand of Dr. Bell, made the cows the property of the latter, or precluded the plaintiff from saying that they were not his property, we do not see that there is any contention. Section 3174 of the general statutes provides that in any suit involving the title to stock, the brand on an animal shall be *prima fade*evidence of the ownership of the animal by the person owning the brand, provided the brand has been duly recorded as required by law. There was no evidence whether this brand had been recorded or not; but if its record had been proved it would only have been *prima fade*evidence. The evidence introduced was amply sufficient to overcome any presumption arising even on a recorded brand, and to put the defendant upon his proof. The granting of the non-suit was error.

Let the judgment be reversed.

*Reversed.*
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 223 (Monday, November 20, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 67114]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9271]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Meeting of the Defense Policy Board Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense Policy Board Advisory Committee.

ACTION: Notice of closed meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Policy Board Advisory Committee will meet in 
closed session on December 14, 2006 from 0800 hrs until 1830 and 
December 15, 2006 from 0800 hrs until 1600 at the Pentagon. The purpose 
of the meeting is to provide the Secretary of Defense, Deputy Secretary 
of Defense and Under Secretary of Defense for Policy with independent, 
informed advice on major matters of defense policy. The Board will hold 
classified discussions on national security matters.
    In accordance with Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act, Public Law No. 92-463, as amended [5 U.S.C. App II (1982)], it has 
been determined that this meeting concerns matters listed in 5 U.S.C. 
552B(c)(1)(1982), and that accordingly this meeting will be closed to 
the public.

    Dated: November 13, 2006.
C.R. Choate,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 06-9271 Filed 11-17-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   Exhibit 10.19


                           LEASE AMENDMENT AGREEMENT


         THIS AMENDMENT AGREEMENT dated March 8, 2000, is a rider to and forms a
part of the original lease (the "Lease") dated May 7, 1999, between CAMPAU
BUILDING COMPANY, L.L.C., a Michigan Limited Liability company ("Landlord") and
KNOWLEDGEWARE SOLUTIONS, L.L.C., a Michigan Limited Liability company ("Tenant")
for 3,847 square feet in the Peoples Building. The following revisions are made
to the original lease:

     1.   The Lease is for 3,351 rentable (2,996 useable) square feet on the 7th
          floor and 3,847 rentable (3,440 useable) square feet on the 8th floor
          Peoples Building for total rentable square feet of 7,198.

     2.   The Lease amendment is for 27 months commencing April 1, 2000, and
          ending June 30, 2002, under the same terms and conditions as were in
          effect in the original lease. The TOTAL RENTAL AMOUNT for this period
          shall be One Hundred Seventy-Two Thousand Nine Hundred Forty Four
          Dollars ($172,944.00).

          The lease rates will be as follows:


         Months      Rate per Square Foot/Yr.        $ per Month         Total
         ------      ------------------------        -----------        --------

         1 - 15              $10.38                     $ 6,228         $ 93,420
        16 - 27              $11.05                     $ 6,627         $ 79,524

                                                        TOTAL           $172,944

     3.   Beginning July 1, 2000 Landlord to contract for Tenant's janitorial
          service with cleaning limited to five (5) times per week. Tenant will
          reimburse Landlord monthly for Tenant's janitorial service.

     4.   Total rentable square feet in building is 72,850 sq. ft. (65,143
          useable). Lessee's pro-rata share of building is 9.88%.

     5.   Landlord will provide up to $10,000 for renovation of the 7th floor
          subject space. All renovation expense over $10,000 will be paid by
          Tenant. All changes must be approved by Landlord.

     6.   Tenant will pay for the following expenses in addition to rent:
          electric, janitorial and telephone.

     7.   There are no future lease term options granted to tenant in this
          agreement.

         All other covenants and conditions of the Lease shall remain in effect,
and no covenant or condition of the Lease shall be deemed waived by any action
or non-action in the past.

LESSOR:                                        LESSEE:

CAMPAU BUILDING COMPANY, L.L.C.                KNOWLEDGEWARE SOLUTIONS, L.L.C.

By: /s/ Paul B. Renucci                        By: /s/
   -----------------------------                  ----------------------------
     Paul B. Renucci
     Its: Member                                  Its: President
#### § 146.137 xxx

###### Cross Reference

Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 77747, Sept. 23, 2024.
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

Educational AdministrationEducational TechnologyElementary Secondary EducationInstructional InnovationInstructional LeadershipProfessional DevelopmentStrategic PlanningTechnology IntegrationTechnology Transfer

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
Editorial Note on Part 7
Editorial Note: The Alphabetical Listing is updated annually by the Office of the Federal Register.

§ 7.39 Mesa Verde National Park. ( a ) Visiting of cliff dwellings is prohibited except when persons are accompanied by a uniformed National Park Service employee. However, the Superintendent may issue special written permits to persons engaged in scientific investigations authorizing such persons to visit the cliff dwellings without escort. The Superintendent shall approve issuance of a permit provided: ( 1 ) That the investigation plan proposed, in purpose and in execution, is compatible with the purposes for which the park was established;
( 2 ) That the investigation proposed will not jeopardize the preservation of park resources;
( 3 ) That the study undertaken will have demonstrable value to the National Park Service in its management or understanding of park resources; and
( 4 ) That the permit applicants are adequately experienced and equipped so as to insure that the objectives of paragraphs (a) (1), (2), and (3) of this section will be obtained.
( b ) Hiking is permitted only on trails designated for that purpose by the Superintendent by the posting of appropriate signs or by marking on a map which shall be available for inspection by the public at park headquarters and other convenient locations within the park. Persons hiking on the Pictograph Point or Spruce Canyon Trails must register in advance with the Superintendent.
( c ) *Commercial automobiles and buses.* The prohibition against the admission of commercial automobiles and buses to Mesa Verde National Park, contained in § 5.4 of this chapter shall be subject to the following exceptions: Motor vehicles operated on an infrequent and nonscheduled tour on which the visit to the park is an incident to such tour, carrying only round trip passengers traveling from the point of origin of the tour, will be accorded admission to the park upon establishing to the satisfaction of the Superintendent that the tour originated from such place and in such manner as not to provide, in effect, a regular and duplicating service conflicting with, or in competition with, the services provided for the public pursuant to contract authorization with the Secretary.
[24 FR 11049, Dec. 30, 1959, as amended at 37 FR 23334, Nov. 2, 1972]
BILLING CODE: 6715-01-M 

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Notice

TIME AND DATE:

THURSDAY, JANUARY 28, 2021 AT 10:00 A.M.

PLACE:

VIRTUAL HEARING. NOTE: BECAUSE OF THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC, WE WILL 

CONDUCT THE HEARING VIRTUALLY. IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO ACCESS THE 

HEARING, SEE THE INSTRUCTIONS BELOW.

STATUS:

THIS HEARING WILL BE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC. TO ACCESS THE VIRTUAL 

HEARING, GO TO THE COMMISSION’S WEBSITE www.fec.gov AND CLICK ON THE 

BANNER TO BE TAKEN TO THE HEARING PAGE.

MATTER TO BE CONSIDERED:

Audit Hearing: Grassroots Victory Political Action Committee

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Judith Ingram, Press Officer

Telephone: (202) 694-1220

Authority: Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b

Signed: _______________________________

Laura E. Sinram

Acting Secretary and Clerk of the Commission

Submitted: January 21, 2021