alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32





Certification pursuant to
Title 18 of the United States Code Section 1350,


as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, each of the undersigned officers of HSW
International, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies that the Company’s Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008 (the “Report”) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company as of, and for, the period presented in the
Report.











March
      31, 2009
            March
      31, 2009By:
            /s/
      Henry N. Adorno
            
            By:
            /s/
      Shawn G. MeredithHenry
      N. Adorno
            Shawn
      G. MeredithVice
      Chairman
            Chief
      Financial Officer





The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
document.  This certification shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes
of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) or
otherwise subject to liability under that section.  This certification
shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act except to the extent this Exhibit 32
is expressly and specifically incorporated by reference in any such
filing.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to HSW International, Inc. and will be
retained by HSW International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 909.110 Self-evaluation. ( a ) The agency shall, by August 24, 1987, evaluate its current policies and practices, and the effects thereof, that do not or may not meet the requirements of this part, and, to the extent modification of any such policies and practices is required, the agency shall proceed to make the necessary modifications.
( b ) The agency shall provide an opportunity to interested persons, including handicapped persons or organizations representing handicapped persons, to participate in the self-evaluation process by submitting comments (both oral and written).
( c ) The agency shall, until three years following the completion of the self-evaluation, maintain on file and make available for public inspection: ( 1 ) A description of areas examined and any problems identified, and
( 2 ) A description of any modifications made.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.3

                              LORAIN NATIONAL BANK
                             401(K) RETIREMENT PLAN
                  ENROLLMENT FORM AND SALARY SAVINGS AGREEMENT

SS Number _____-___-______

Name:  ___________________________________________   Date of Birth:  ___/___/___

Address:  ________________________________________   Date of Hire:  ___/___/___

          ________________________________________

City:  __________________________  State:  ______________  Zip Code:  __________

         [ ] Check here to only correct or change the above information.

                         AUTOMATIC PARTICIPATION NOTICE

I am aware that upon my employment to Lorain National Bank, I am automatically
enrolled as a participant in the Bancorp (401(k) Retirement Plan and
automatically 3% of my compensation will be deferred.

                       3% of My Compensation From Each Pay

         [ ]  I DO NOT WISH to take advantage of this opportunity to become a
              Participant in Lorain National Bank 401(k) Retirement Plan at this
              time. I understand that I may change this election later by filing
              a new copy of this form.

                          I AM CURRENTLY A PARTICIPANT

         As a participant, I AUTHORIZE Lorain National Bank TO CHANGE the amount
         it deducts from my Compensation from

            _________% of My Compensation To __________% of My Compensation


         I understand that this change will be effective on the first date of
the next valuation date.

         [ ] I WITHDRAW MY AUTHORIZATION TO CONTINUE payroll deductions under
             the Lorain National Bank 401(k) Retirement Plan. I understand this
             will be effective 30 days from delivery of this notice to Lorain
             National Bank. I further understand that I may again authorize
             payroll deductions if I file a new copy of this form.

Signed:  _________________________________________        Date:  _______________
         Participant

Signed:  _________________________________________        Date:  _______________
         On Behalf Of The Plan
#### § 261.76 Regulations applicable to Region 6, Pacific Northwest Region, as defined in § 200.2. [Reserved]
BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

In the Matter of 

Audit Division Recommendation 

Memorandum on the UtePAC 

) 

) A19-07 

) Agenda Document No. 22-12-A 

) 

CERTIFICATION 

I, Vicktoria J. Allen, recording secretary for the Federal Election Commission open 

meeting on April 28, 2022, do hereby certify that the Commission decided by a vote of 6-0 to 

approve the Audit Division Recommendation Memorandum on the UtePAC (A19-07), Agenda 

Document No. 22-12-A, as recommended in the Memorandum from the Chief Compliance 

Officer and the Audit Division dated March 16, 2022, and subject to the addition of the word 

“corrected” in the heading of Finding 2, so that it reads “ Increase Activity Corrected”. 

Commissioners Broussard, Cooksey, Dickerson, Trainor, Walther, and Weintraub voted 

affirmatively for the decision. 

Attest: 

Digitally signed by Vicktoria J 

Vicktoria J Allen Allen

Date: 2022.04.28 22:38:16 -04'00' April 28, 2022 

Date Vicktoria J. Allen 

Acting Deputy Secretary of the 

Commission
Editorial Note on Part 1303
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1303 appear at 89 FR 67816, Aug. 21, 2024.

§ 1303.33 Termination of delegate agencies. ( a ) If a grant recipient shows cause why termination is appropriate or demonstrates cost effectiveness, the grant recipient may terminate a delegate agency's contract.
( b ) The grant recipient's decision to terminate must not be arbitrary or capricious.
( c ) The grant recipient must establish a process for defunding a delegate agency, including an appeal of a defunding decision and must ensure the process is fair and timely.
( d ) The grant recipient must notify the responsible HHS official about the appeal and its decision.
# PAC Table 1

&"Arial,Bold"&KFF0000This table was generated on 9/13/23.
#### Edward Rowe, Respondent, *v.*Isabel H. Gerry, Appellant, and The East Norwalk Lumber Company et al., Respondents.

(Argued April 29, 1907;

decided May 21, 1907.)

*Rowe*v. *Gerry,*112 App. Div. 358, affirmed.

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered April 25; 1906, affirming a_ judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term in an action to foreclose mechanics’ liens.

*Henry G. K. Heath*for appellant.

*Milo J. White*for plaintiff, respondent.

*J. Mortimer Bell*for defendants, respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., Gray, O’Brien, Vann, Werner and Chase, JJ. Not sitting: Willard Bartlett, J.
#### New York Market Gardeners’ Association, Respondent, *v.*O’Neill-Adams Company, Appellant.

*New York Market Gardeners’ Assn.*v. *Adams Dry Goods Co.,*115 App. Div. 42, affirmed.

(Argued October 30, 1907;

decided November 19, 1907.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered October 17, 1906, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an.action to recover for an alleged breach of contract.

*JBeno B. GatteTl*and *Thomas D. Adams*for appellant.

*William D. Gaillard*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Yann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ.
Exhibit 3.1

                                    AMENDMENT

                                       TO

                            ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION

                                       OF

                     INNOVATIVE SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.


      On  August  8,  2001,  Innovative  Software  Technologies,  Inc.  filed  a
Certificate  of  Amendment  of Articles  of  Incorporation  with the  California
Secretary  of  State,   certifying   that  Article  FIFTH  of  the  Articles  of
Incorporation was amended to read as follows:

                                  ARTICLE FIVE

      The total number of shares of stock which the  corporation  shall have the
authority to issue 125,000,000 consisting of 100,000,000 shares of Common Stock,
$0.001 par value share  ("Common  Stock"),  and  25,000,00  shares of  Preferred
Stock, having no par value per share (the Preferred Stock).

      Dividends  may be paid upon the Common  Stock as and when  declared by the
Board  of  Directors  of the  Corporation  out of any  funds  legally  available
therefore.  The rights,  preferences,  privileges and restrictions granted to or
imposed  upon the  Preferred  Stock  will  later be  determined  by the board of
directors.
Rank ID # Committee Amount

1 C00401224 ACTBLUE $60,367,858

2 C00341396 MOVEON.ORG POLITICAL ACTION $29,049,999

3 C00449280 FREE AND STRONG AMERICA PAC INC. $8,675,546

4 C00448696 SENATE CONSERVATIVES FUND $8,222,746

5 C00309567 LYNDON LAROUCHE POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $7,861,817

6 C00454074 OUR COUNTRY DESERVES BETTER PAC - TEAPARTYEXPRESS.ORG $7,720,942

7 C00370007 DEMOCRACY FOR AMERICA $6,798,517

8 C00438747 LIFE AND LIBERTY PAC INC $6,372,640

9 C00455378 THE NATIONAL REPUBLICAN TRUST PAC $5,224,473

10 C00458588 SARAH PAC $4,356,458

11 C00442319 REPUBLICAN MAJORITY CAMPAIGN $3,880,865

12 C00384701 EVERY REPUBLICAN IS CRUCIAL (ERICPAC) $3,759,308

13 C00460147 DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE - TRAVEL OFFSET ACCOUNT $3,242,319

14 C00467688 FREEDOM FIRST PAC $3,221,556

15 C00305805 FREEDOM PROJECT; THE $3,197,339

16 C00401786 FREEDOM'S DEFENSE FUND $2,923,930

17 C00305797 AMERICA'S FOUNDATION $2,788,808

18 C00271338 AMERIPAC: THE FUND FOR A GREATER AMERICA $2,672,149

19 C00457705 COUNTRY FIRST POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE, INC. (COUNTRY FIRST PAC) $2,177,126

20 C00230342 21ST CENTURY DEMOCRATS $2,161,264

21 C00250399 AUTOMOTIVE FREE INTERNATIONAL TRADE PAC $2,130,087

22 C00305318 BLUE DOG POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $2,119,385

23 C00458000 PROGRESSIVE CHANGE CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE $2,060,408

24 C00325076 CAMPAIGN FOR WORKING FAMILIES $2,030,082

25 C00409730 NEW DEMOCRAT COALITION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE AKA NDC PAC $1,969,341

26 C00441949 JSTREETPAC $1,841,989

27 C00280222 KPMG PARTNERS/PRINCIPALS & EMPLOYEES PAC $1,802,302

28 C00448373 HUCK PAC $1,745,459

29 C99002396 AMERICAN POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $1,739,374

30 C00326439 HOUSE CONSERVATIVES FUND $1,594,810

31 C00399196 BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS IN DIVERSE GEOGRAPHIC ENVIRONMENTS PAC (BRIDGE PAC) $1,571,509

32 C00363994 HILL PAC $1,520,008

33 C00416131 MIDWEST VALUES PAC $1,391,381

34 C00247403 NORPAC $1,312,419

35 C00400937 VETERANS FOR VICTORY PAC $1,299,346

36 C00457291 ACU-STRIKEFORCE POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $1,226,243

37 C00428052 MAJORITY COMMITTEE PAC--MC PAC $1,211,955

38 C00412791 FORWARD TOGETHER PAC $1,172,950

39 C00235655 BLUEGRASS COMMITTEE $1,170,995

40 C00386482 RIGHTMARCH.COM PAC INC $1,164,168

41 C00344234 PAC TO THE FUTURE $1,119,894

42 C00327395 SEARCHLIGHT LEADERSHIP FUND $1,103,262

43 C00417857 MINUTEMAN PAC INC $1,102,730

44 C00353953 GLACIER PAC $1,069,117

45 C00350462 CONTINUING A MAJORITY PARTY ACTION COMMITTEE (CAMPAC) $1,063,843

46 C00325993 DEFEND AMERICA PAC $1,025,594

47 C00377689 PROSPERITY PAC $1,002,532

48 C00437053 BLACK REPUBLICAN PAC $993,161

49 C00363770 PEOPLE FOR ENTERPRISE TRADE AND ECONOMIC GROWTH (PETE PAC) $976,342

50 C00165159 REPUBLICAN MAINSTREET PARTNERSHIP PAC $966,009

Top 50 NonConnected PACs by Disbursements

January 1, 2009 - December 31, 2010

PAC Table 5b
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-4142

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

AMEER G. MIKHAIL,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CR-94-

407-MJG)

Submitted: August 28, 1997 Decided: September 12, 1997

Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ameer G. Mikhail, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew George Warrens Norman,

Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant filed an untimely notice of appeal. We dismiss for

lack of jurisdiction. The time periods for filing notices of appeal

are governed by Fed. R. App. P. 4. These periods are "mandatory and

jurisdictional." Browder v. Director, Dep't of Corrections, 434

U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S.

220, 229 (1960)). Parties to criminal actions have ten days within

which to file in the district court notices of appeal from judgments or final orders. Fed. R. App. P. 4(b). The only exception to

the appeal period is when the district court extends the time to

appeal on a showing of excusable neglect. See id.

The district court entered its order on January 16, 1997;

Appellant's notice of appeal was filed on February 10, 1997, which

is beyond the ten-day appeal period. Appellant's failure to note a

timely appeal or obtain an extension of the appeal period leaves

this court without jurisdiction to consider the merits of Appellant's appeal. We therefore dismiss the appeal. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 213 (Friday, November 3, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64703-64704]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9074]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FARM CREDIT ADMINISTRATION


Farm Credit Administration Board; Regular Meeting

AGENCY: Farm Credit Administration.

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the Government in the 
Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b(e)(3)), of the regular meeting of the Farm 
Credit Administration Board (Board).
    Date and Time: The regular meeting of the Board will be held at the 
offices of the Farm Credit Administration in McLean, Virginia, on 
November 9, 2006, from 9 a.m. until such time as the Board concludes 
its business.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Roland E. Smith, Secretary to the Farm 
Credit Administration Board, (703) 883-4009, TTY (703) 883-4056.

ADDRESSES: Farm Credit Administration, 1501 Farm Credit Drive, McLean, 
Virginia 22102-5090.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This meeting of the Board will be open to 
the public (limited space available). In order to increase the 
accessibility to Board meetings, persons requiring assistance should 
make arrangements in advance.

[[Page 64704]]

The matters to be considered at the meeting are:

Open Session

A. Approval of Minutes

    <bullet> October 12, 2006 (Open and Closed).

B. New Business--Regulations

    <bullet> Disclosure and Reporting Requirements--Final Rule.
    <bullet> Farmer Mac Risk-Based Capital Stress Test--Final Rule.

C. Reports

    <bullet> Office of Management Services Quarterly Report.

    Dated: November 1, 2006.
Roland E. Smith,
Secretary, Farm Credit Administration Board.
[FR Doc. 06-9074 Filed 11-1-06; 12:23 pm]
BILLING CODE 6705-01-P
[Crim. No. 531.

Fourth Appellate District.

May 17, 1940.]

#### THE PEOPLE, Respondent, v. CONSTANCE ALCANTARA et al., Appellants.

*162Morris B. Chain for Appellants.

Bari Warren, Attorney-General, and Walter L. Bowers, Deputy Attorney-General, for Respondent.

MARKS, J.

This is an appeal from judgments pronounced upon defendants after verdicts finding them guilty of grand theft.

The defendants admit there is sufficient evidence to support the verdicts and judgments. But one error of law is urged here.

While Constance Alcantara was on the witness stand the district attorney asked him if he had been convicted of a felony, to which he replied that he had not. Later in the trial the county clerk of Kern County was called as a witness. He produced the records of the superior court of that county in the case of *People*v. *Constance Alcantara.*These records were finally received in evidence over the objection of defendants. During the argument over the admissibility of the record of conviction, a counsel for defendants made the following statement in open court: “We will stipulate the record shows he has been convicted of second degree robbery, and sentenced to serve a year in the County jail. ’ ’

The court records admitted in evidence show that Alcantara was convicted of “Attempted Second Degree Robbery” and was sentenced to serve one year in the county jail. It is now agreed that it was error to admit this record.

We cannot regard this error as prejudicial. Defendants’ counsel had admitted that the record showed that Alcantara had been convicted of second degree robbery. The record showed that he had been convicted of *attempted*second degree robbery, a lesser offense. Before the admission of the record, the jury was in possession of the information that the record in question showed that Alcantara had been convicted of a greater crime. The record tended to correct a mistaken assumption indulged in during the trial and showed the true fact concerning the prior conviction. We cannot see how prejudice can be predicated upon this error in admitting the record in evidence when that record showed that Alcantara had been convicted of a lesser crime than his counsel admitted in the presence of the jury. Under *163these circumstances the error was harmless, if not actually beneficial to defendants.

The judgments are affirmed.

Barnard, P. J., and Griffin, J., concurred.
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite ofcataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)
**Title:****Airlinetransport pilot and aircraft type rating : practical test standards forairplane.**** 
SuDocNumber:TD4.32/22:8081-5 F
ItemNumber:0431-A-49
CGPsystem Number:000634452
 
Current
 
2001
2006
2008
 **
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 208 (Friday, October 27, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 63026]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-8926]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Amended Notice of 
Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National 
Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Special Emphasis Panel, November 9, 
2006, 8 a.m. to November 10, 2006, 6 p.m., Bethesda Marriott, 5151 
Pooks Hill Road, Bethesda, MD 20814 which was published in the Federal 
Register on September 14, 2006, FR 06-7626.
    The November 9-10, 2006 meeting location was changed from Bethesda 
Marriott to Holiday Inn and Suites, Chicago, IL. The meeting is closed 
to the public.

    Dated: October 20, 2006.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 06-8926 Filed 10-26-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
§ 1326.23 Non-allowable costs for the State Protection and Advocacy System. ( a ) Federal financial participation is not allowable for: ( 1 ) Costs incurred for activities on behalf of individuals with developmental disabilities to solve problems not directly related to their disabilities and which are faced by the general populace. Such activities include but are not limited to: Preparation of wills, divorce decrees, and real estate proceedings. Allowable costs in such cases would include the Protection and Advocacy System providing disability-related technical assistance information and referral to appropriate programs and services; and
( 2 ) Costs not allowed under other applicable statutes, Departmental regulations and issuances of the Office of Management and Budget.
( b ) Attorneys' fees are considered program income pursuant to 45 CFR part 75 and must be added to the funds committed to the program and used to further the objectives of the program. This requirement shall apply to all attorneys' fees, including those earned by contractors and those received after the project period in which they were earned.
§ 261.51 Posting. Posting is accomplished by: ( a ) Placing a copy of the order imposing each prohibition in the offices of the Forest Supervisor and District Ranger, or equivalent officer who have jurisdiction over the lands affected by the order, and
( b ) Displaying each prohibition imposed by an order in such locations and manner as to reasonably bring the prohibition to the attention of the public.
§ 1321.31 Amendments to the State plan. ( a ) Subject to prior approval by the Assistant Secretary for Aging, a State agency shall amend the State plan whenever necessary to reflect: ( 1 ) New or revised statutes or regulations as determined by the Assistant Secretary for Aging;
( 2 ) An addition, deletion, or change to a State agency's goal, assurance, or information requirement statement;
( 3 ) A change in the State agency's intrastate funding formula or funds distribution plan for Title III funds, as set forth in § 1321.49 or § 1321.51;
( 4 ) A request to waive State plan requirements as set forth in section 316 of the Act (42 U.S.C. 3030c-3), or as required by guidance as set forth by the Assistant Secretary for Aging; or
( 5 ) Other changes as required by guidance as set forth by the Assistant Secretary for Aging.
( b ) A State agency shall amend the State plan and notify the Assistant Secretary for Aging of an amendment not requiring prior approval whenever necessary and within 30 days of the action(s) listed in paragraphs (b)(1) through (6) of this section: ( 1 ) A significant change in a State law, organization, policy, or State agency operation;
( 2 ) A change in the name or organizational placement of the State agency;
( 3 ) Distribution of State plan administration funds for demonstration projects;
( 4 ) A change in planning and service area designation, as set forth in § 1321.13;
( 5 ) A change in area agency on aging designation, as set forth in § 1321.19; or
( 6 ) Exercising of major disaster declaration flexibilities, as set forth in § 1321.101.
( c ) Information required by this section shall be submitted according to guidelines prescribed by the Assistant Secretary for Aging.