alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 97-1446NI

_____________

John E. Coonley, As Trustee of the *

James E. Coonley II Trust; ABCM *

Corporation, *

* Appeal from the United States

Appellants, * District Court for the Northern

* District of Iowa.

v. *

* [PUBLISHED]

Fortis Benefits Insurance Company, *

*

Appellee. *

_____________

 Submitted: October 22, 1997

Filed: October 30, 1997

_____________

Before FAGG, WOLLMAN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

_____________

PER CURIAM.

John E. Coonley, as Trustee of the James E. Coonley II Trust, and ABCM

Corporation appeal an adverse grant of summary judgment on their claim that James

E. Coonley II was an insured employee under a group life insurance policy governed

by the Employment Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. See Coonley v. Fortis

Benefits Ins. Co., 956 F. Supp. 841 (N.D. Ia. 1997). Having reviewed the record and

the parties' submissions, we conclude that an extensive discussion is not warranted.

The district court has written a comprehensive opinion addressing the issues raised by
-2-

the parties, and we have nothing to add to the district court's analysis. We see no error

by the district court and affirm the judgment substantially for the reasons stated in the

district court's memorandum opinion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
# CongressionalCandidate Table11b

&"Arial,Bold"&10&KFF0000This table was generated on 5/11/20.
§ 9.61 How do I apply for a temporary access permit? To apply for a temporary access permit, you must submit the following information to the Superintendent of the System unit in which you propose to conduct operations: ( a ) Documentation demonstrating that you hold a right, and the extent of such right, to operate within the System unit;
( b ) A map delineating the proposed reconnaissance survey areas in relation to the System unit boundary and the proposed area of operations at a minimum scale of 1:24,000, or a scale specified by the Superintendent as acceptable;
( c ) A brief description of the intended operation so that we can determine the scope of the reconnaissance surveys needed;
( d ) The name and contact information of the operator, employee, agent, or contractor responsible for overall management of the proposed reconnaissance surveys;
( e ) The name, legal address, telephone number, and qualifications of all specialists responsible for conducting the reconnaissance surveys;
( f ) A description of proposed means of access and routes proposed for conducting the reconnaissance surveys; and
( g ) A description of the survey methods you intend to use to identify the natural and cultural resources.
1

(ORDER LIST: 539 U.S.)

THURSDAY, JUNE 5, 2003

ORDER IN PENDING CASES

02-1674-ATX ) McCONNELL, SENATOR, ET AL. V. FEC, ET AL.

)

02-1675-ATX ) NRA, ET AL. V. FEC, ET AL.

)

02-1676-ATX ) FEC, ET AL. V. McCONNELL, SENATOR, ET AL.

)

02-1702-ATX ) McCAIN, SENATOR, ET AL. V. McCONNELL, SENATOR, ET AL.

)

02-1727-ATX ) REPUBLICAN NAT. COMM. V. FEC, ET AL.

)

02-1733-ATX ) NAT. RIGHT TO LIFE, ET AL. V. FEC, ET AL.

)

02-1734-ATX ) ACLU V. FEC, ET AL.

)

02-1740-ATX ) ADAMS, VICTORIA J., ET AL. V. FEC, ET AL.

)

02-1747-ATX ) PAUL, CONGRESSMAN, ET AL. V. FEC, ET AL.

)

02-1753-ATX ) CA DEMOCRATIC PARTY, ET AL. V. FEC, ET AL.

)

02-1755-ATX ) AFL-CIO, ET AL. V. FEC, ET AL.

)

02-1756-ATX ) CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, ET AL. V. FEC, ET AL.

In these cases probable jurisdiction is noted.

The cases are consolidated and a total of four hours

is allotted for oral argument. The briefs of the parties 

who were plaintiffs in the District Court are to address 

the questions presented in the jurisdictional statements 

and are to be filed with the Clerk of the Court and served 

upon the parties who were defendants in the District Court 

on or before 3 p.m., Tuesday, July 8, 2003. The briefs of 

the parties who were defendants in the District Court are 

to be filed with the Clerk of the Court and served upon 

the parties who were plaintiffs in the District Court on 
2

or before 3 p.m., Tuesday, August 5, 2003. Any reply 

briefs by parties who were plaintiffs in the District 

Court are to be filed with the Clerk of the Court and 

served upon parties who were defendants in the District

Court on or before 3 p.m., Thursday, August 21, 2003. 

The cases are set for oral argument at 10:00 a.m.,

Monday, September 8, 2003.
Case 1:22-cv-02139-TJK Document 16 Filed 11/04/22 Page 1 of 2 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

)

AB PAC, )

)

Plaintiff, ) Civ. No. 22-2139 (TJK)

)

v. )

) MOTION TO DISMISS

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, )

)

Defendant. )

)

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION’S PARTIAL MOTION

TO DISMISS AMENDED COMPLAINT

Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Federal Election

Commission (“FEC” or “Commission”) hereby moves for an order dismissing the portion of

plaintiff’s amended complaint alleging that the Commission has unlawfully failed to act on an

administrative complaint plaintiff filed alleging that former president Donald J. Trump violated

52 U.S.C. § 30116(f) by accepting excessive contributions from his leadership PAC and a joint

fundraising committee because plaintiff has not established Article III standing to obtain any

relief on this portion of its claim. A supporting memorandum and a proposed order accompany

this motion.

Respectfully submitted,

Lisa J. Stevenson (D.C. Bar No. 457628) Jacob Siler (D.C. Bar No. 1003383)

Acting General Counsel Assistant General Counsel

lstevenson@fec.gov jsiler@fec.gov

Kevin Deeley /s/ Shaina Ward

Associate General Counsel Shaina Ward (D.C. Bar No. 1002801)

kdeeley@fec.gov Attorney

sward@fec.gov
 

 

 

 

Case 1:22-cv-02139-TJK Document 16 Filed 11/04/22 Page 2 of 2 

November 4, 2022

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

1050 First Street NE

Washington, DC 20463

(202) 694-1650

2
EXHIBIT 99.2
                                                                    ------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Insilco Holding Co. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael
R. Elia, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



                                             /S/ MICHAEL R. ELIA
                                             -------------------------
                                             Michael R. Elia
                                             Chief Financial Officer
                                             August 14, 2002
#### William Schradin, as Administrator of the Estate of Hermann Schradin, Deceased, Respondent, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant.

*Sahraclin*v. *N. T. O. & H. JR. B. B. Go.,*124 App. Div. 705, affirmed.

(Argued December 15, 1908;

decided January 12, 1909.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered March 19, 1908, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover for the death of plaintiff’s intestate alleged to have occurred through defendant’s negligence.

*Robert A. Kutschbock*and *Charles C. Paulding*for appellant.

*George Vivian Smith*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs, the court being of opinion that the act (Chapter 657 of the Laws of 1906) on which the defendant’s liability is based is constitutional, the classification that is made in that act being a reasonable one; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Oil. J., Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Yann, Werner and Chase, JJ. Dissenting: Hisoook, J.
```

[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 215 (Tuesday, November 7, 2006)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 65035]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9118]



                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 71 , No. 215 / Tuesday, November 7, 2006 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 65035]]

                Presidential Determination No. 2006-26 of September 29, 
                2006

                
Presidential Determination on Drawdown of 
                Commodities and Services from the Department of Defense 
                to Support Transport of Indonesian Peacekeeping Forces 
                to Lebanon

                Memorandum for the Secretary of State [and the] 
                Secretary of Defense

                Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the 
                Constitution and laws of the United States, including 
                section 552(c)(2) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 
                1961, as amended, I hereby determine that:

(1) as a result of an unforeseen emergency, the provision of assistance 
under Chapter 6 of Part II of the Act in amounts in excess of funds 
otherwise available for such assistance is important to the national 
interests of the United States; and

(2) such unforeseen emergency requires the immediate provision of 
assistance under Chapter 6 of Part II of the Act.

                I, therefore, direct the drawdown of up to $2,999,000 
                in commodities and services from the Department of 
                Defense to support the transportation of Indonesian 
                forces in support of the United Nations Interim Force 
                in Lebanon.

                The Secretary of State is authorized and directed to 
                report this determination to the Congress and to 
                publish it in the Federal Register.

                    (Presidential Sig.)B

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    Washington, September 29, 2006.

[FR Doc. 06-9118
Filed 11-6-06; 8:45 am]
Billing code 4710-10-P
```
Exhibit 23.2
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.333-117234) of Tejas Incorporated and Subsidiaries of our report dated March 4, 2004 (except formatters disclosed in Note 1 paragraphs 2 and 3, as to which the date is December 9, 2004), withrespect to the consolidated financial statements of Tejas Incorporated and Subsidiaries for theyear ended December 31, 2003, included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December31, 2004.
Austin, TexasMarch 31, 2005                                                                                /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
§ 101.54 Elements of an allocation order. Allocation orders may be issued directly to the affected persons or by constructive notice through publication in the Federal Register. This section describes the elements that each order must include. ( a ) Each allocation order must include: ( 1 ) A detailed description of the required allocation action(s), including its relationship to any received DX rated orders, DO rated orders, and unrated orders;
( 2 ) Specific start and end calendar dates for each required allocation action;
( 3 ) The written signature on a manually placed order or the digital signature on an electronically placed order of the Secretary of HHS.
( b ) ( 1 ) Elements to be included in orders issued directly to affected persons:
( 2 ) A statement that reads in substance: “This is an allocation order certified for national defense use. [Insert the name of the person receiving the order] is required to comply with this order, in accordance with the provisions of the Health Resources Priorities and Allocations System regulation (45 CFR part 101);
( c ) ( 1 ) Elements to be included in an allocation order that gives constructive notice through publication in the Federal Register *:*
( 2 ) A statement that reads in substance: “This is an allocation order certified for national defense use. [Insert the name(s) of the person(s) to whom the order applies or a description of the class of persons to whom the order applies] is (are) required to comply with this order, in accordance with the provisions of the Health Resources Priorities and Allocations System regulation (45 CFR part 101).
§ 147.160 Parity in mental health and substance use disorder benefits. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 77751 , Sept. 23, 2024.
( a ) *In general.* The provisions of § 146.136 of this subchapter apply to health insurance coverage offered by health insurance issuer in the individual market in the same manner and to the same extent as such provisions apply to health insurance coverage offered by a health insurance issuer in connection with a group health plan in the large group market.
( b ) *Applicability date.* The provisions of this section apply for policy years beginning on or after the applicability dates set forth in § 146.136(i) of this subchapter. This section applies to non-grandfathered and grandfathered health plans as defined in § 147.140.
[78 FR 68296, Nov. 13, 2013]
§ 223.111 Administration of contracts in designated disaster areas. This section is to implement the provisions of section 242 (a), (b), and (c) of the Disaster Relief Act of 1970 (84 Stat. 1956) which relate to contracts for the sale of National Forest timber in connection with areas damaged by major disaster as designated by the President pursuant to the Act. ( a ) Where an existing contract for the sale of National Forest timber does not provide relief from major physical change not due to purchaser's negligence prior to approval of construction of any section of specified road or other specified development facility and, as a result of a major disaster in a designated area a major physical change results in additional construction work by the purchaser in connection with such a road or facility, the United States shall bear such increased construction cost if, as determined by the Chief, Forest Service, the estimated cost is— ( 1 ) More than $1,000 for sales under 1 million board feet, or
( 2 ) More than $1 per thousand board feet for sales of 1 to 3 million board feet, or
( 3 ) More than $3,000 for sales over 3 million board feet.
( b ) Where the Chief, Forest Service, determines that damages are so great that restoration, reconstruction, or construction is not practical under the cost-sharing arrangement in paragraph (a) of this section, he may allow cancellation of the contract notwithstanding provisions therein or in § 223.116.
( c ) The Chief, Forest Service, is authorized to reduce to 7 days the minimum time to advertise the sale of National Forest timber whenever he determines that— ( 1 ) The sale of such timber will assist in the construction of any area of a State damaged by a major disaster,
( 2 ) The sale of such timber will assist in sustaining the economy of such area, or
( 3 ) The sale of such timber is necessary to salvage the value of timber damaged in such major disaster or to protect undamaged timber.
( d ) Any request for relief under paragraph (a) or (b) of this section shall be made in writing to the Forest Supervisor having administrative responsibility for the land involved.
(Sec. 242 (a), (b), and (c), 84 Stat. 1756, 42 U.S.C. 4461)
#### § 910.68 Storefront.

*Storefront* means the street level frontage relating to a single establishment.
# EUR-Lex - 12008E/PRO/11 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008E/PRO/11

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - PROTOCOLS - Protocol (No 11) on Article 42 of the Treaty on European Union **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0278 - 0278 *

PROTOCOL (No 11)

ON ARTICLE 42 OF THE TREATY ON EUROPEAN UNION

THE HIGH CONTRACTING PARTIES,

BEARING IN MIND the need to implement fully the provisions of Article 42(2) of the Treaty on European Union,

BEARING IN MIND that the policy of the Union in accordance with Article 42 shall not prejudice the specific character of the security and defence policy of certain Member States and shall respect the obligations of certain Member States, which see their common defence realised in NATO, under the North Atlantic Treaty and be compatible with the common security and defence policy established within that framework,

HAVE AGREED UPON the following provision, which shall be annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union:

The European Union shall draw up, together with the Western European Union, arrangements for enhanced cooperation between them.

--------------------------------------------------
###### Editorial Note on Part 1303

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1303 appear at 89 FR 67816, Aug. 21, 2024.

#### § 1303.51 Subordination of the federal interest.

Only the responsible HHS official can subordinate federal interest to the rights of a lender or other third party. Subordination agreements must be in writing and the mortgage agreement or security agreement for which subordination is requested must comply with § 1303.49. When the amount of federal funds already contributed to the facility exceeds the amount to be provided by the lender seeking subordination, the federal interest may only be subordinated if the grant recipient can show that funding is not available without subordination of the federal interest.
§ 1322.19 Responsibilities of service providers. As a condition for receipt of funds under this part, each Tribal organization and Hawaiian Native grantee shall assure that providers of services shall: ( a ) Provide service participants with an opportunity to contribute to the cost of the service as provided in § 1322.13(c)(2)(i);
( b ) Provide, to the extent feasible, for the furnishing of services under this Act, through self-direction;
( c ) With the consent of the older Native American, or their legal representative if there is one, or in accordance with local adult protective services requirements, bring to the attention of adult protective services or other appropriate officials for follow-up, conditions or circumstances which place the older Native American, or the household of the older Native American, in imminent danger;
( d ) Where feasible and appropriate, make arrangements for the availability of services to older Native Americans and family caregivers in weather-related and other emergencies;
( e ) Assist participants in taking advantage of benefits under other programs;
( f ) Assure that all services funded under this part are coordinated with other appropriate services in the community, and that these services do not constitute an unnecessary duplication of services provided by other sources; and
( g ) Receive training to provide services in a culturally competent manner and consistent with §§ 1322.13 through 1322.17.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10(j)

                               FIRST AMENDMENT TO
                             THE ADVEST THRIFT PLAN

         1. The first paragraph of Section 4.1 of The Advest Thrift Plan (the
"Plan) is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows, effective as of the
day following the acquisition of The Advest Group, Inc. by MONY Acquisition
Corp. (the "Effective Date"):

                  "SERVICE REQUIREMENT. Every Employee of the Employer who is
         scheduled to work at least 20 hours per week and who is not classified
         by the Employer as a "temporary employee" shall be eligible to
         participate in the Plan as of the Entry Date coinciding with or next
         following the date the Employee first becomes an Employee.
         Notwithstanding the foregoing, an Employee shall not be eligible to be
         allocated Employer contributions under Sections 5.1 (a) and (b), and an
         Employee scheduled to work less than 20 hours per week or who is
         classified by the Employer as a "temporary employee" shall not be
         eligible to participate in the Plan at all, until the Entry Date
         coinciding with or next following the date one year following the date
         the Employee first completed an Hour of Service if he has completed
         1,000 Hours of Service within that consecutive 12-month period, or if
         he has not completed 1,000 Hours of Service during that initial 12
         consecutive months, the end of the first Plan Year in which he
         completes at least 1,000 Hours of Service."

         2. Section 5.1 of the Plan is hereby amended by adding the following
new subsection (c) to the end thereof, to read in its entirety as follows,
effective as of the Effective Date:

         3. "(c) THE EMPLOYER DISCRETIONARY CONTRIBUTION FORMULA. The Employer
shall make a contribution to the Plan for the 2000 Plan Year (to be allocated to
the 401(k) Accounts of Active Participants) within the time prescribed by law
for filing of the income tax returns for the Company's fiscal year, including
any extensions thereof, of twenty (20) shares of common stock of The MONY Group
Inc., on behalf of each Active Participant who is in the
<PAGE>   2
employ of the Employer on the earlier of (a) December 31, 2000, or (b) the date
of merger of the Company with and into MONY Acquisition Corp."


                                      -2-
SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

ONE HUNDRED FIFTH CONGRESS 

FIRST SESSION { CONVENEDJANUARY7, 1997 

SECOND SESSION { 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Tuesday, February 25, 1997 

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF GARY SISCO, 

SECRETARY OF THE SENATE 

By David G. Marcos, Executive Clerk 
1 

RESOLUTIONS 

CALENDAR Ex.RES REPORTED 

No. No. SUBJECT BY 
2 

TREATIES 

CALENDAR - TREATY REPORTED 

No. Doc. No SUBJECT BY 
3 

NOMINATIONS 

CALENDAR MESSAGE REPORTED 

No. No. NOMINEE, OFFICE, AND PREDECESSOR BY 

EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT 

* 23 78 Charlene Barshefsky, of the District of Columbia, Feb 3, 97 Reported by Mr. Roth, 

to be United States Trade Representative, Committee on Finance, without 

with the rank of Ambassador Extraordinary printed report. 

and Plenipotentiary, vice Michael Kantor. 

*Signifies nominee's commitment to respond to requests to appear and test~fy before any duly constituted commLttee of the Senate 
4 

NOMINATIONS PLACED ON THE SECRETARY'S DESK
Exhibit 10(a)



   

  

  


	EXHIBIT 10(a)



	INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT






	We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Post-Effective
      Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement No. 333-32242 on Form N-1A of
      our reports dated November 21, 2000 appearing in the Annual Report of Mercury
      Select Growth Fund (the “Fund”) of Mercury Funds, Inc. for the
      year ended September 30, 2000 covering both the Fund and Mercury Master
      Select Growth Portfolio, and to the reference to us under the caption “Financial
      Highlights” in the Prospectus, which is a part of such Registration
      Statement.





	/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP





	Princeton, New Jersey

      January 5, 2001