alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 5179.

#### B. C. Guthrie *v.*The State.

Opinion delivered May 14, 1887.

Willfully Obstructing a Public Road—Evidence that the accused, by-direction of the owner of land traversed by a public road, placed a gate across the road, but, on being told that he had thereby obstructed a public road, stated that he was ignorant of the fact that the road was a public road, and forthwith removed the gate, fails to show that the obstruction was willful, and, on the contrary, tends to show that it was not willful; wherefore a conviction is not supported by such proof.

Appeal from the County Court of Williamson. Tried below before Hon. W. M. Key, County Judge.

The opinion sufficiently states the case. The punishment of appellant was assessed at a fine of twenty-five dollars.

No brief for appellant.

*W. L. Davidson,*Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Willson, Judge.

It appears from the evidence that defendant placed the gate across the road by direction"of the owner of the land upon which said road was located. When told that he had thus obstructed a public road, he stated that he was ignorant of the fact that it was a public road, and without delay removed the obstruction.

In our opinion the evidence fails to prove that defendant acted *willfully*in placing the gate across the road. On the contrary, we think it shows that the act was without any evil intent on his part, but was the result solely of ignorance of fact. He promptly removed the obstruction when he was informed that the road was public, which conduct is inconsistent with the theory that he had placed it there willfully. There is no evidence, either direct or circumstantial, which contradicts his statement that he was ignorant of the fact that the road was a public one at the time he placed the gate across it.

Because in our opinion the evidence does not support the conviction, the judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded.

*Reversed and remanded.*
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

BRUCE THOMPSON,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 428 EAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 11th day of February, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
Exhibit 32.1

Statement Required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, each undersigned officer of NYSE Euronext (the Company) hereby
certifies that, to such officers knowledge, the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|                     |  |                                       
|-------------------- |  | --------------------------------------
|Date: March 25, 2008 |  | /S/    DUNCAN L.
NIEDERAUER           
|                     |  | Duncan L. Niederauer                  
|                     |  | Chief Executive Officer               
|                     |  | NYSE Euronext                         
|                     | 
|Date: March 25, 2008 |  | /S/    JOOST
VAN DER DOES DE WILLEBOIS
|                     |  | Joost van der Does de Willebois       
|                     |  | Acting Chief Financial Officer        
|                     |  | NYSE Euronext                         

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not
being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
BILLING CODE: 6715-01-M

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE:

TUESDAY, APRIL 16, 2024 AT 10:00 A.M. AND ITS CONTINUATION AT THE 

CONCLUSION OF THE OPEN MEETING ON APRIL 18, 2024

PLACE:

1050 FIRST STREET, N.E., WASHINGTON, D.C. AND VIRTUAL

(THIS MEETING WILL BE A HYBRID MEETING.)

STATUS:

THIS MEETING WILL BE CLOSED TO THE PUBLIC.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Compliance matters pursuant to 52 U.S.C. § 30109.

Matters relating to internal personnel decisions, or internal rules and practices.

Information the premature disclosure of which would be likely to have a considerable 

adverse effect on the implementation of a proposed Commission action.

Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings or arbitration.

* * * * * *

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Judith Ingram, Press Officer

Telephone: (202) 694-1220

(Authority: Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b)

Vicktoria J. Allen

Deputy Secretary of the Commission

Submitted: April 3, 2024
#### Achilo Palmijiano, as Administrator of the Estate of Vincenzo Palmijiano, Deceased, Respondent, *v.*Hyde McFarlin Company, Appellant.

*Palmijiano*v. *Hyde-MeEarlin Company,*126 App. Div. 221, affirmed.

(Argued December 15,1908;

decided January 5, 1909.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered May 12, 1908, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover for the death of plaintiff’s intestate alleged to have occurred through defendant’s negligence.

*Clinton B. Gibbs*for appellant.

*Eugene M. Bartlett*and *Arthur W. Decker*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Werner, Hiscook and Chase, JJ.
#### § 51.32 What is the process if the Director determines that the best responsive proposal was not submitted by a preferred offeror?

If the Director determines that a proposal other than the responsive proposal submitted by a preferred offeror is the best proposal submitted for a qualified concession contract, then the Director must advise the preferred offeror of the better terms and conditions of the best proposal and permit the preferred offeror to amend its proposal to match them. An amended proposal must match the better terms and conditions of the best proposal as determined by the Director. If the preferred offeror duly amends its proposal within the time period allowed by the Director, and the Director determines that the amended proposal matches the better terms and conditions of the best proposal, then the Director must select the preferred offeror for award of the contract upon the amended terms and conditions, subject to other applicable requirements of this part.
# PAC Table 4d

&"Arial,Bold"&10&KFF0000This table was generated on 8/25/20.
§ 1326.105 Evidence. ( a ) *Testimony.* Testimony by witnesses at the hearing is given orally under oath or affirmation. Witnesses must be available at the hearing for cross-examination by all parties.
( b ) *Stipulations and exhibits.* Two or more parties may agree to stipulations of fact. Such stipulations, or any exhibit proposed by any party, must be exchanged at the prehearing conference or at a different time prior to the hearing if the presiding officer requires it.
( c ) *Rules of evidence.* Technical rules of evidence do not apply to hearings conducted pursuant to this subpart, but rules or principles designed to assure production of the most credible evidence available and to subject testimony to test by cross-examination are applied where reasonably necessary by the presiding officer. A witness may be cross-examined on any matter material to the proceeding without regard to the scope of his or her direct examination. The presiding officer may exclude irrelevant, immaterial, or unduly repetitious evidence. All documents and other evidence offered or taken for the record is open to examination by the parties and opportunity must be given to refute facts and arguments advanced on either side of the issues.
1

Mears, Gilbert

From: Walter, Cynthia <cynthia.walter@email.stvincent.edu>

Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2014 2:10 PM

To: Mears, Gilbert

Subject: Docket #: EPA-HQ-TRI-2013-0281 

Follow Up Flag: Follow up

Flag Status: Flagged

Dear Mr. Mears,

I wish to thank the EPA for providing the information on the web site for Toxics Release Inventory (TRI).

I hope that the program can not only be continued, but also expanded.

First,  the accuracy of information needs some more efforts.

For example,  I noticed that some sites releasing significant substances are not on the maps.

Some of the these are sources of substantial, serious pollutants,  documented in other government sources or even in

peer‐reviewed publications. These sources are likely to be on the list of required reporting, but there may be some

unfortunate limitations in updating your data.  If so,  those limitations should be overcome.

Second,  there should be a way to combine information on the web site that includes all releases covered by law with

releases from other  relevant sources that are known from state and other documented sources. Those other sources

may not be on the required EPA list,  but people in the region need this combined information. Citizens and scientists

such as myself do not have the time or computer power to make these combinations, but the data are needed.  

I have used TRI in my classes and plan to continue using it.

In addition,  I volunteer for various groups interested in water and air quality.  

Finally, I have many family members and friends who have asthma and other medical conditions impacted by air and

drinking water pollution.

Thank you for your efforts to be part of the protection activity in the EPA mission.

Cynthia Walter, Ph.D.

916 Essex Dr.

Greensburg, PA 15601

cwalter@stvincent.edu

412‐610‐4327
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Recombinant DNA Advisory Committee, December 5, 2006, 8 a.m. to December 6, 2006, 6 p.m., National Institutes of Health, Building 31, 31 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on November 13, 2006, 71 FR 218, page 66180.                

The meeting of the Recombinant DNA Advisory Committee will begin on December 5 at 12 noon and will end December 6, 2006 at 6 p.m. instead of 8 a.m. to 6 p.m. The meeting is open to the public.

Dated: November 16, 2006.

Anna Snouffer,

Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 06-9387  Filed 11-22-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
§ 12a.7 Determination of availability. ( a ) Within 45 days after receipt of a letter from HUD pursuant to § 12a.4(a), each landholding agency must transmit to HUD a statement of one of the following: ( 1 ) In the case of unutilized or underutilized property: ( i ) An intention to declare the property excess,
( ii ) An intention to make the property available for use to assist the homeless, or
( iii ) The reasons why the property cannot be declared excess or made available for use to assist the homeless. The reasons given must be different than those listed as suitability criteria in § 12a.6.
( 2 ) In the case of excess property which had previously been reported to GSA: ( i ) A statement that there is no compelling Federal need for the property, and that, therefore, the property will be determined surplus; or
( ii ) A statement that there is a further and compelling Federal need for the property (including a full explanation of such need) and that, therefore, the property is not presently available for use to assist the homeless.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 934 

To amend the Department of Energy Organization Act to assign certain 

functions to the Assistant Secretaries of Energy relating to energy emergencies and energy security, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 22, 2023 

Mr. BARRASSO (for himself, Mr. RISCH, Mr. CRAPO, and Ms. COLLINS) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Department of Energy Organization Act to 

assign certain functions to the Assistant Secretaries of 

Energy relating to energy emergencies and energy security, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ENERGY EMERGENCY AND ENERGY SECURITY 

4 FUNCTIONS ASSIGNED TO ASSISTANT SECRE5 TARIES OF ENERGY. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 203(a) of the Department 

7 of Energy Organization Act (42 U.S.C. 7133(a)) is 

8 amended— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 934 IS

1 (1) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), in 

2 the second sentence, by striking ‘‘, but are not lim3 ited to,’’; and 

4 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

5 ‘‘(12) Energy emergency and energy security 

6 functions, including— 

7 ‘‘(A) responsibilities with respect to infra8 structure, cybersecurity, emerging threats, sup9 ply, and emergency planning, coordination, re10 sponse, and restoration; and 

11 ‘‘(B) on request of a State, local, or Tribal 

12 government or energy sector entity, and in con13 sultation with other Federal agencies, as appro14 priate, provision of technical assistance, sup15 port, and response capabilities with respect to 

16 energy security threats, risks, and incidents.’’. 

17 (b) COORDINATION.—The Secretary of Energy shall 

18 ensure that the functions of the Secretary of Energy de19 scribed in paragraph (12) of section 203(a) of the Depart20 ment of Energy Organization Act (42 U.S.C. 7133(a)) are 

21 performed in coordination with relevant Federal agencies. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent

v. JOHN MCLAUGHLIN, Petitioner : : : : : : : : : : : No. 227 EAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 9th day of September, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED
.
BILLING CODE: 6715-01-M 

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Notice

TIME AND DATE:

THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 2021 AT 10:00 A.M.

PLACE:

VIRTUAL HEARING. NOTE: BECAUSE OF THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC, WE WILL 

CONDUCT THE HEARING VIRTUALLY. IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO ACCESS THE 

HEARING, SEE THE INSTRUCTIONS BELOW.

STATUS:

THIS HEARING WILL BE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC. TO ACCESS THE VIRTUAL 

HEARING, GO TO THE COMMISSION’S WEBSITE www.fec.gov AND CLICK ON THE 

BANNER TO BE TAKEN TO THE HEARING PAGE.

MATTER TO BE CONSIDERED:

Repayment Hearing: Jill Stein for President

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Judith Ingram, Press Officer

Telephone: (202) 694-1220

Authority: Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b

Signed: _______________________________

Laura E. Sinram

Acting Secretary and Clerk of the Commission

Submitted: February 18, 2021
§ 1184.8 How can I address concerns regarding my request? ( a ) *FOIA Public Liaison.* If you have questions or concerns regarding your request, your first point of contact should be the FOIA Public Liaison, who is responsible for reducing delays, increasing transparency and understanding of the status of requests, and assisting in the resolution of disputes.
( b ) *Additional resource.* The National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), Office of Government Information Services (OGIS) offers non-compulsory, non-binding mediation services to help resolve FOIA disputes. If you seek information regarding OGIS and/or the services it offers, please contact OGIS directly at Office of Government Information Services, National Archives and Records Administration, 8601 Adelphi Road-OGIS, College Park, MD 20740-6001, Email: *ogis@nara.gov ,* Phone: (202) 741-5770 or toll free (877) 684-6448, Fax: (202) 741-5769. This information is provided as a public service only. By providing this information, IMLS does not commit to refer disputes to OGIS, or to defer to OGIS' mediation decision in particular cases.
[79 FR 9423, Feb. 19, 2014, as amended at 84 FR 22947, May 21, 2019]
#### Thomas S. McLachlan, Appellant, *v.*Village of Whitehall, Respondent.

*McLaehlin*v. *Village of*Whitehall, 121 App. Div. 903, affirmed.

(Argued January 26, 1909;

decided February 9, 1909.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered October 9, 1907, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at a Trial Term in an action to recover for an alleged breach of contract.

*Edgar L. Fursman*and *Edgar Hull*for appellant.

*J. Sanford Potter*and *Otis A. Dennis*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscook and Chase, JJ.
&tuatr nf tl]t luitf~ jtatts 

NINETY-FIRST CONGRESS 

F S {Convened January 3, 1969 

IR T ESSION ~ Adjourned December 23, 1969 

S S {Convened January 19, 1970 

ECOND ESSION 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Pre pared under the direction of FRANCIS R. V ALEO, Secretary of the Senate 

By GERALD A. HACKETT, Executive Clerk 

Thursday, March 19, 1970 

PENDING EXECUTIVE BUSINESS 

Calendar No. 21. The nomination of George Harrold Carswell, of Florida, to be an Associate Justice of the 

Supreme Court of the United States. 

UNANIMOUS-CONSENT AGREEMENT 

Ordm·ed, That the Senate vote at 12 noon on Thursday, Mar. 19, 1970, on the resolution of ratification to the 

protocol to the International Convention for the Northwest Atlantic Fisheries (Ex I, 91st Cong., 1st sess); to be 

Immediately followed by a vote on the resolution of ratification, with the 2 reservatiOns, to the ConventiOn on the 

Privileges and Immunities of the United Nations (Ex. J, 91st Cong, 1st sess); following whiCh the nomination of 

George Harrold Carswell w1ll be the pending business before the Senate. 

(Mar. 18, 1970) 

TREATIES 

Date of Calendar Treaty No. Subject Action of committee 

report No 

-

1970 

Mar 17 2 Ex. I (91st Cong , Protocol to theN orthwest Atlantic F1sherie~ Reported favorably by 

1st sess) Con ven t10n Mr. Fulbright, from 

the Committee on 

Foreign Relations, 

with a printed report. (See Ex. Rept. 

91-16, 91st Cong., 

2d sess.) 

17 3 Ex. J (91st Cong., Convention on the Pnvlleges and Immuni- Reported favorably, 

1st sess.) ties of the United Nations. w1th reservatiOns, by 

Mr. Fulbright, from 

the Committee on 

Foreign Relations, 

with a printed report. 

(See Ex. Rept. 91-17, 

91st Cong., 2d sess.) 

37-022-70-No 152 
2 

NOMINATION I 

Date or Calendar Message Name of nominee Oftlce Predecessor 

report No. No. 

SUPREME COURT OF 

THE UNITED STATES 

1970 

Feb. Zl 21 1 George Harrold Carswell, An AssoCiate Justice of Abe Fort~, :resigned. 

of Flonda the Supreme Court of [R~tted favorably 

the Umted States. ~Mr. Ea.stlall<l, 

from the Commit'tee 

on the JudiCiary, 

together with individual views. (See 

Ex. Rept. 91-14, 

91st Cong, 2d 

sess.)) 

U S GOVERNMENT PRHlTING OFF~E 1970
§ 61.5 Grants to State programs. ( a ) Each State with an approved State program is eligible for grants-in-aid from the Historic Preservation Fund (HPF).
( b ) The National Park Service (NPS) will administer HPF matching grants-in-aid in accordance with the Act, OMB Circular A-133 and 43 CFR part 12, and related guidance that NPS issues. Failure by a State program to meet these requirements is cause for comment and appropriate action by the Secretary.
Document

Exhibit 10.2




Summary of Marriott International, Inc. Director Compensation


Non- Employee Directors
						
		
		
	Board Retainer Fee (annual)	$85,000
	Deferred Share Award (annual)	$165,000
	Audit Committee Chair Fee (annual)	$30,000
	Other (non-Audit) Committee Chair Fee (annual)	$20,000
	Audit Committee Member Retainer (annual)	$15,000
	Lead Independent Director Fee (annual)	$40,000


We typically pay retainer, chair and lead independent director cash fees on a quarterly basis. However, in light of the rapidly evolving COVID-19 pandemic, in March 2020, the Board determined that all director cash fees payable for services during the 2020 fiscal year be reduced to zero, regardless of whether a director had elected previously to defer all or a portion of such cash fees. In accordance with established Company procedures, a director may make an advance election to defer payment of all or a portion of his or her director cash fees pursuant to the Company’s Stock and Cash Incentive Plan and/or the Executive Deferred Compensation Plan.  The Company grants the Non-Employee Director Deferred Share Awards following the Company’s annual meeting of stockholders.


Other Information


The Company reimburses directors for travel expenses, other out-of-pocket costs they incur when attending meetings and, for one meeting per year, attendance by spouses. To encourage our directors to visit and personally evaluate our properties, the directors also receive complimentary rooms, food and beverages at Company-owned, operated or franchised hotels, as well as the use of hotel-related services such as Marriott-managed golf and spa facilities, when on personal travel. The value of these benefits is reported to the directors as taxable compensation and the directors are not provided any gross-up to cover such taxes. 


Employee Directors


Officers of the Company are not paid for their service as directors.
1

PART I: FECFile Basics

• Getting started with FECFile

• Setting up your database

• Creating individual reports

PART II: FEC Form 1 (Statement of Organization)

• Treasurer designation

• Affiliated committees

• Joint fundraisers

• Bank depositories

• Multiple email addresses

• Changing committee address

• Reporting changes / amendments

PART III: Reporting Receipts

• Types of receipts reported on Schedule A

• Itemization thresholds

• Individual and candidate contributions

• Creating new contact v. existing contact

• Partnership contributions (introduction 

to transaction splits)

• In-kind contributions

• PAC and political committee contributions

• Using PAC look-up function

PART IV: Reporting Disbursements

• Types of disbursements reported on 

Schedule B

• Operating Expenditures

• Staff reimbursements / credit card payments

• Contributions to other federal candidate 

committees

• Refunds of individual contributions

• Nonfederal contributions

PART V: Providing Additional Information

• Miscellaneous Electronic Submission 

(Form 99)

• Memo text on report

• Memo text v. memo item

PART VI: Filing Reports

• Close / validate / save / upload

• How to amend report

HELPFUL LINKS

• Electronic filing resources

• FECFile video tutorials

• Reporting and 

additional resources

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 2024 WEBINAR SERIES

Federal Election Commission

2024 April Quarterly/Monthly Basic FECFile Webinar

for PACs & Party Committees

April 3, 2024 (12:00 - 2:00 p.m. Eastern Time)