Case 1:22-cv-02139-TJK Document 14 Filed 10/14/22 Page 1 of 17 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

AB PAC 

800 Maine Avenue SW, Suite 400 

Washington, DC 20024, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

1050 First Street NE 

Washington, DC 20463, 

Defendant. 

Civil Action No. 1:22-CV-02139 

AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF 

INTRODUCTION 

1. Exactly 211 days ago, on March 17, 2022, AB PAC filed an administrative 

complaint with the Federal Election Commission (the “FEC” or “Commission”), alleging that 

former president Donald J. Trump violated the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as 

amended (the “Act” or “FECA”), by making expenditures to advance his 2024 presidential 

campaign without filing a statement of candidacy with the FEC or disclosing those expenditures, 

and by accepting excessive contributions from his leadership PAC and a joint fundraising 

committee. 

2. The goal and effect of Mr. Trump’s efforts is to disguise his run for the presidency, 

leaving AB PAC and voters in the dark about the contributions and expenditures he has received 

and made, and who is managing the campaign’s finances—all information they are entitled to 

under FECA. 
 

 

 

 

 

 

Case 1:22-cv-02139-TJK Document 14 Filed 10/14/22 Page 2 of 17 

3. Mr. Trump’s failure to declare his candidacy in accordance with the law and 

acceptance of unlawful contributions provides him with a competitive edge over the Democratic 

candidate in the 2024 presidential election, who Plaintiff plans to support through independent 

expenditures and other measures. It also allows him to raise unlimited funds for independent 

expenditure-only committees with which he is affiliated. AB PAC is injured by the competitive 

advantages that such independent expenditure-only committees have obtained because Mr. Trump 

has flouted the campaign finance laws. 

4. To Plaintiff’s knowledge, the Commission has taken no action on the March 2022 

administrative complaint. 

5. Since Plaintiff filed the administrative complaint, three FEC quarterly reporting 

deadlines have passed. Had the FEC acted swiftly to enforce the law, Mr. Trump would have been 

required to register a principal campaign committee, disclosing information about his campaign 

personnel on FEC Form 1 (the Statement of Organization) and all of his campaign activities on 

detailed reports. 

6. But because the Commission’s inaction has allowed Mr. Trump to continue 

violating the law, Plaintiff and the public have been denied valuable information. Furthermore, as 

each day passes that Mr. Trump fails to file a statement of candidacy and is accepting excessive 

contributions, he sets himself up to have an unlawful head start against his opponents. Because 

Mr. Trump is not technically a “candidate” under FECA, he is raising unlimited contributions for 

independent expenditure-only committees that compete directly with AB PAC. Time is of the 

essence, and Plaintiff has no recourse but to ask this Court to require the FEC to remedy these 

continuing violations of the Act. 

2 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case 1:22-cv-02139-TJK Document 14 Filed 10/14/22 Page 3 of 17 

7. Accordingly, Plaintiff hereby requests that this Court declare the FEC’s failure to 

act contrary to law and order the FEC to conform within 30 days by acting on Plaintiff’s 

administrative complaint. See 52 U.S.C. § 30109(a)(8)(A). If the FEC does not conform to such 

order within 30 days, FECA authorizes Plaintiff to commence a civil action, naming Mr. Trump 

as the defendant, to remedy the violations cited in the original complaint. See id. § 30109(a)(8)(C). 

* * * 

8. This is an action against the FEC under 52 U.S.C. § 30109(a)(8)(A) based on 

unlawful agency delay. Plaintiff AB PAC seeks declaratory and injunctive relief to compel 

Defendant FEC to take action on Plaintiff’s administrative complaint, alleging violations of 52 

U.S.C. §§ 30102(e)(1), 30104, and 30116(f)—provisions of the Act requiring candidates to 

register with the FEC, file disclosure reports, and adhere to the contribution limits. 

9. AB PAC filed an administrative complaint with the FEC on March 17, 2022, 

alleging that Donald Trump has violated the Act in several ways. He failed to file a statement of 

candidacy; he failed to file reports that would have disclosed expenditures made to support his 

presidential bid; and he has accepted excessive contributions from Save America—his leadership 

PAC—and Save America Joint Fundraising Committee—a joint fundraising committee in which 

Save America participates. 

10. Plaintiff’s administrative complaint asked the Commission to (1) investigate the 

allegations against Mr. Trump, (2) compel disclosure of any expenditures made to support 

Mr. Trump’s candidacy, (3) enjoin Mr. Trump from further violations, and (4) fine Mr. Trump the 

maximum amount permitted by law. 

11. FECA provides administrative complainants with a right of action against the FEC 

if the Commission fails to act on a complaint within 120 days. Id. § 30109(a)(8)(A). 

3 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case 1:22-cv-02139-TJK Document 14 Filed 10/14/22 Page 4 of 17 

12. It has been 211 days since AB PAC filed its administrative complaint, and there is 

no indication that the FEC has taken any action on the matter. 

13. The Commission’s failure to act injures the public by denying them information 

about the raising and spending of a candidate running for the highest office in the country and the 

identity of those responsible for managing his campaign. Moreover, the Commission’s inaction is 

allowing one candidate to build a campaign with illegal funds and to raise unlimited funds for 

independent expenditure-only committees that support him, giving him a competitive advantage 

over his opponents. If the Commission does not put a stop to Mr. Trump’s unlawful actions, it will 

only encourage other candidates to evade the requirements of the campaign finance system. 

14. The Commission’s failure to act also causes direct and unique injuries to AB PAC 

by hindering its ability to educate the media and the public on Mr. Trump’s activities. Because 

Mr. Trump has failed to file the required disclosure reports, AB PAC cannot review a single FEC 

report to determine Mr. Trump’s spending in support of his campaign. In an effort to try to learn 

information about his spending, AB PAC gathers information piecemeal through an exhaustive 

review of journalistic accounts of Mr. Trump’s whereabouts. It then cross-references information 

gleaned from those articles with Save America’s FEC reports to try to parse out which expenditures 

were for the purpose of aiding Mr. Trump’s election prospects, and which were for true leadership 

PAC activities. These efforts require the diversion of resources that AB PAC would otherwise use 

for mission-critical efforts. Had the FEC not failed to act and required Mr. Trump to comply with 

the Act, AB PAC would be able to obtain this information directly from reports that Mr. Trump is 

required to file with the FEC. Similarly, the FEC’s failure to act has deprived AB PAC of 

information regarding the extent to which Mr. Trump’s leadership PAC is funding his campaign 

and whether or how much of Mr. Trump’s personal resources are being used to further his 

4 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case 1:22-cv-02139-TJK Document 14 Filed 10/14/22 Page 5 of 17 

campaign. AB PAC’s efforts to learn this information yields incomplete results and diverts 

resources from AB PAC’s mission of providing research to the media and the public on political 

races across the country. Similarly, AB PAC will have to spend more money on independent 

expenditures supporting the 2024 Democratic presidential nominee to counter Mr. Trump’s 

unlawful head start on campaigning. Plaintiff therefore requests that this Court declare the FEC’s 

failure to act on the administrative complaint contrary to law and order the Commission to conform 

with such declaration within 30 days. 

JURISDICTION AND VENUE 

15. This Court has both subject matter jurisdiction over this action and personal 

jurisdiction over the parties pursuant to 52 U.S.C. § 30109(a)(8)(A) and 28 U.S.C. § 1331. 

16. Venue lies in this district under 52 U.S.C. § 30109(a)(8)(A). 

THE PARTIES 

17. Plaintiff AB PAC is a hybrid political action committee (“PAC”), also known as a 

Carey PAC,1 that is registered with the FEC. A hybrid PAC has both a contribution and noncontribution account. The non-contribution account may receive unlimited donations and make 

independent expenditures, like an independent expenditure-only committee or “Super PAC.” The 

separate contribution account, meanwhile, may contribute directly to campaigns but must abide by 

the federal campaign finance limits, including those laid out in FECA. 

18. AB PAC supports Democratic candidates by conducting research on Republican 

candidates, which it releases to the public and the media. It also tracks Republican candidates to 

make the public aware of activities that would otherwise remain out of the media spotlight. 

1 Carey v. FEC, No. 1:11-cv-00259-RMC (D.D.C. Aug. 19, 2011), ECF No. 28 (allowing PACs 

to maintain one account that is subject to the Act’s contribution limits and one account that operates 

as a super PAC). 

5 
 

 

 

 

 

Case 1:22-cv-02139-TJK Document 14 Filed 10/14/22 Page 6 of 17 

Additionally, AB PAC makes independent expenditures in support of Democratic candidates. It 

spent tens of millions of dollars on communications opposing Mr. Trump and supporting thencandidate President Joseph Biden in the 2020 presidential election. In the 2024 presidential 

election, AB PAC again plans to make independent expenditures opposing the Republican 

nominee and supporting the Democratic nominee. 

19. As part of its efforts to educate the media and the public about candidates running 

for office, AB PAC studies candidates’ FEC reports and organizational filings. It spends significant 

resources reviewing FEC reports, producing educational materials summarizing any discoveries 

related to campaign finance violations by Republican candidates, and pitching those materials to 

the press. AB PAC cannot effectively perform this key part of its mission in races in which a 

candidate is not filing reports, as required by federal law. AB PAC attempts to cope with this issue 

by adding more staff members and more staff time to races where there is no disclosure or improper 

disclosure, so that it can attempt to monitor press accounts and related PACs’ reports for 

information about the offending candidate. However, it is impossible for AB PAC to be confident 

that it is producing comprehensive educational materials under these circumstances, and the 

burdensome process diverts resources away from AB PAC’s other activities and limits the total 

number of races with which it can engage. 

20. AB PAC is regulated by FECA and directs most of its operations in competition 

with Republican candidates and PACs. In addition to monitoring Republican candidates, AB 

PAC’s expenditure strategy is in part informed by the behavior of Republican PACs. For example, 

if a Republican PAC makes an advertising buy in a given race, AB PAC will often make a similar 

advertising buy in an attempt to balance out the spending in favor of its preferred candidates. 

6 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case 1:22-cv-02139-TJK Document 14 Filed 10/14/22 Page 7 of 17 

21. A candidate who flouts the campaign finance laws obtains several competitive 

advantages. The candidate’s campaign may amass more money from individuals and their 

leadership PAC, and thus has a greater ability to communicate with the public and promote their 

message. A candidate who solicits unlimited funds for independent expenditure-only committees 

that will support that candidate also benefits from increased independent expenditures. The 

candidate’s opponents, who are abiding by FECA, are at a disadvantage. AB PAC will have to 

spend more money to level the playing field for a Democratic candidate who faces fundraising and 

campaign practices barred by federal law. And if AB PAC is investing more resources on 

independent expenditures in one race, it cannot pay for as many independent expenditures in 

support of other Democratic candidates or spend on other activities that further its mission. An 

entity whose competition benefits from unlawful campaign practices is injured by those practices. 

22. The competitive advantages conferred by a candidate’s failure to file a statement of 

candidacy and unlawful fundraising extend beyond their immediate campaign. Because the 

individual is technically not a “candidate” under FECA, they can raise unlimited funds for 

independent expenditure-only committees that support them. Such committees thus receive a 

significant fundraising advantage with potentially long-term impacts. The benefits, in other words, 

flow freely from Mr. Trump to the entire political ecosystem of Republican PACs, Super PACs, 

and candidates that AB PAC must expend resources to monitor and with whom AB PAC competes 

on several metrics, including spending on independent expenditures in support of preferred 

candidates. 

23. Defendant FEC is an independent federal agency charged with the administration 

and civil enforcement of FECA. 52 U.S.C. § 30106(b). 

7 
 

 

 

Case 1:22-cv-02139-TJK Document 14 Filed 10/14/22 Page 8 of 17 

FACTUAL BACKGROUND 

24. Mr. Trump has been making public statements indicating his intent to run for 

president for over 15 months. On or about July 1, 2021, in response to Fox News host Sean Hannity 

asking him whether he had decided to run again, Mr. Trump answered “Yes.” Ex. 1 at 2. 

25. The following month, again speaking on television with Mr. Hannity about whether 

he would run in 2024, Mr. Trump stated, “So because the campaign finance laws are extremely 

complicated and unbelievably stupid, I’m actually not allowed to answer that question, can you 

believe that? I’d love to answer it. But let me put it this way; I think you’ll be happy and I think a 

lot of our friends will be happy but I’m not actually allowed to answer it. Makes it very difficult if 

I do.” Id. (quoting Greg Evans, Trump Claims He is “Not Allowed to Say” if He Will be Running 

for President in 2024, INDY100 (Aug. 18, 2021), https://www.indy100.com/news/trump-president2024-interview-hannity-b1904465). 

26. In September 2021, when asked again if he was going to run for president, 

Mr. Trump replied, “Oh, that’s a tough question. Actually for me it’s an easy question. I mean, I 

know what I’m going to do, but we’re not supposed to be talking about it yet from the standpoint 

of the campaign finance laws, which frankly are ridiculous.” Id. (quoting C-SPAN, Former 

President Trump Visits New York City on September 11 (Sept. 11, 2021), https://www.cspan.org/video/?c4976508/president-trump-visits-york-city-september-11). 

27. In January 2022, when Mr. Trump was introduced at his golf course as the 45th 

President of the United States, he responded, “the 45th and 47th.” Id. at 2-3. 

28. While speaking at the Conservative Political Action Conference in February 2022, 

Mr. Trump said of a third presidential campaign: “We did it twice and we’ll do it again . . . we’re 

8 
 

 

 

 

 

 

Case 1:22-cv-02139-TJK Document 14 Filed 10/14/22 Page 9 of 17 

going to be doing it again a third time.” He also referred to his wife as “the future first lady.” Id. 

at 3. 

29. Even more recently, in July 2022, Mr. Trump told a reporter for New York 

Magazine asking about the election that “[in] my own mind, I’ve already made that decision, so 

nothing factors in anymore. In my own mind, I’ve already made that decision.” He further stated 

that the “big decision will be whether I go before or after,” clarifying later that he meant announce 

his run before or after the midterms.2 

30. Since the time Mr. Trump first indicated publicly that he had decided to run for 

president, his leadership PAC, Save America (which is run by his former campaign manager), has 

spent significant sums to promote his candidacy and influence the outcome of the 2024 presidential 

election. For example, Save America has paid for travel, events, rallies featuring Mr. Trump, and 

digital advertisements critical of Mr. Trump’s presumptive opponent President Joseph Biden, and 

it has made consulting payments to Mr. Trump’s former campaign staffers. Based on Save 

America’s FEC reports, these expenditures have far exceeded $5,000. Id. at 3-4. They total in the 

millions. Id. at 7. At times, Save America has spent more than $100,000 per week on Facebook 

advertisements alone. Id. at 8. The full extent of the PAC’s election spending is impossible to know 

because Save America’s reports do not classify any expenditures as in-kind contributions to 

Mr. Trump. 

31. Recent reporting also reveals that, in June and July 2022, Save America paid for 

“intimate dinners” for Mr. Trump to talk about his election plans with his top donors and 

supporters. Conversation centered on whether Mr. Trump should announce his campaign before 

2 Olivia Nuzzi, Donald Trump on 2024: ‘I’ve Already Made that Decision,’ N.Y. MAG. (July 14, 

2022), https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/donald-trump-2024-decision.html. 

9 
 

 

 

 

Case 1:22-cv-02139-TJK Document 14 Filed 10/14/22 Page 10 of 17 

or after the midterm elections and whether his campaign should advance his claims that the 2020 

election was stolen.3 Under federal campaign finance law, these expenses would also count toward 

the total Save America has paid to promote Mr. Trump’s election. See 52 U.S.C. 

§ 30116(a)(7)(B)(i). 

32. Independent expenditure-only committees that support Mr. Trump have obtained a 

competitive advantage over AB PAC because they can share some of the spending burden with 

Save America, which can also spend unlimited funds in support of Mr. Trump. 

33. Save America Joint Fundraising Committee—a joint fundraising committee 

consisting of Save America and another Trump-aligned PAC—has likewise influenced 

Mr. Trump’s election by paying for nearly $100,000 worth of Facebook advertisements, many of 

which promoted Mr. Trump’s rallies. Ex. 1 at 6-7. Of course, none of these have been disclosed 

as in-kind contributions to Mr. Trump, either. 

34. Mr. Trump has also headlined fundraisers in support of independent expenditure-only 

committees that share the same name as his political movement, Make America Great Again, Inc. 

and Make America Great Again, Again!.4 Because Mr. Trump has failed to file a statement of 

candidacy with the FEC, he is not a “candidate” for purposes of FECA and thus does not comply 

with the strict limits that apply to candidates when they fundraise for independent expenditureonly committees. The undisclosed solicitations and contributions that result advantage not only 

Mr. Trump but the candidates he has endorsed and the PACs spending money to support them. 

3 Alex Isenstadt, Trump Discussing 2024 Plans at Secret Donor Dinners, Politico (July 13, 

2022), https://www.politico.com/news/2022/07/13/trump-2024-secret-donor-dinners-00045665. 

4 See, e.g., Zach Everson, Trump Super PAC Charges $100,000 For Candlelight Dinner With 

Former President At His Club, Forbes (Aug. 23, 2022), 

https://www.forbes.com/sites/zacheverson/2022/08/23/trump-super-pac-charges-100000-forcandlelight-dinner-with-former-president-at-his-club/?sh=35add488737f. 

10 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case 1:22-cv-02139-TJK Document 14 Filed 10/14/22 Page 11 of 17 

35. To date, Mr. Trump has not filed a statement of candidacy, registered a principal 

campaign committee, filed any disclosure reports, or reimbursed his leadership PAC for paying 

campaign expenses. 

LEGAL BACKGROUND 

36. The Act defines a “candidate” as an “individual who seeks nomination for election, 

or election, to Federal office.” 52 U.S.C. § 30101(2); see also 11 C.F.R. § 100.3. A person seeks 

nomination or election to federal office if they have either “received contributions in excess of 

$5,000 or [ ] made expenditures aggregating in excess of $5,000,” or have given “consent to 

another person to receive contributions or make expenditures on [their] behalf and such person has 

received such contributions aggregating in excess of $5,000 or has made such expenditures 

aggregating in excess of $5,000.” Id. 

37. For a payment to be an “expenditure,” it must be made “for the purpose of 

influencing [an] election.” Id. § 30101(9)(A)(i); 11 C.F.R. § 100.111(a). Accordingly, if a person 

is spending money only to determine whether they should run for office, those disbursements are 

not “expenditures.” The Commission’s regulations refer to activities aimed at assessing the 

viability of a candidacy as “testing-the-waters” expenses. See 11 C.F.R. § 100.131. Testing-thewaters payments must be made for the purpose of determining whether to run for office and include 

disbursements for items like polling, phone calls, and travel to assess public support. Id. 

§ 100.131(a). 

38. Once a person has decided to run for office, they can no longer use the testing-thewaters exception, and their previous testing-the-waters spending becomes “expenditures” within 

the meaning of the Act. Id. § 100.131(b). This means that if a person has spent more than $5,000 

to test the waters, and then decides to run for office, they immediately become a “candidate” and 

11 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case 1:22-cv-02139-TJK Document 14 Filed 10/14/22 Page 12 of 17 

must report their testing-the-waters expenditures. Id. § 100.131(a); Fed. Elections Comm’n, AO 

2015-09 (Senate Majority PAC & House Majority PAC) at 5 (Nov. 13, 2015) [hereinafter AO 

2015-09]. 

39. The FEC has opined that even when an individual makes a private determination to 

run for office, and even if that decision is not communicated to anyone else, they can no longer 

use the testing-the-waters exception. AO 2015-09 at 5. Of course, once a candidate publicly states 

an intent to run or makes reference to a candidacy, that also makes them ineligible to use the 

testing-the-waters allowance. See 11 C.F.R. § 100.131(b)(3). 

40. When a person becomes a candidate for federal office, they must file a statement 

of candidacy (FEC Form 2) with the FEC within fifteen days of meeting the definition of 

“candidate.” 52 U.S.C. §§ 30102(e)(1), (g); 11 C.F.R. § 101.1(a). On the statement of candidacy, 

the candidate must designate a principal campaign committee. 11 C.F.R. § 101.1(a). The principal 

campaign committee is the committee authorized to accept contributions and make expenditures 

on behalf of the candidate. 52 U.S.C. §§ 30101(5)-(6); 11 C.F.R. §§ 100.5(e)(1), (f)(1). 

41. The principal campaign committee must file a statement of organization (FEC Form 

1), listing the address of the campaign, any committees affiliated with the campaign, the 

campaign’s treasurer and custodian of records, and which bank the campaign uses, among other 

information. 11 C.F.R. § 102.2(a). 

42. The Act requires the principal campaign committee of a presential candidate to file 

quarterly reports in years in which their election is not on the general election ballot, and then file 

monthly reports and pre- and post-election reports during the election year. 52 U.S.C. 

§ 30104(a)(3); 11 C.F.R. § 104.5(b). The reports must disclose all contributions received and 

expenditures made during the reporting period. This includes in-kind contributions from other 

12 
 

 

 

 

 

 

Case 1:22-cv-02139-TJK Document 14 Filed 10/14/22 Page 13 of 17 

PACs and any personal spending of the candidate to advance their campaign. 52 U.S.C. 

§ 30104(b); 11 C.F.R. § 104.3. 

43. A candidate may only accept $5,000 per election from a PAC, including their own 

leadership PAC. 52 U.S.C. § 30116(a)(2)(A). A leadership PAC is a political committee “directly 

or indirectly established, financed, maintained or controlled by a candidate for Federal office or 

an individual holding Federal office but which is not an authorized committee of the candidate.” 

11 C.F.R. § 100.5(e)(6). 

44. A leadership PAC may accept $5,000 per election from individual donors. 52 

U.S.C. § 30116(a)(1)(C). A candidate committee, on the other hand, may only accept $2,900 per 

election from individuals. 52 U.S.C. § 30116(a)(1)(A); 86 Fed. Reg. 7867 (Feb. 16, 2016). 

45. A candidate, candidate’s committee, or leadership PAC may not “solicit, receive, 

direct, transfer, or spend funds in connection with an election for Federal office... unless the funds 

are subject to the limitations, prohibitions, and reporting requirements of” FECA. 52 U.S.C. § 

30125. 

46. FECA allows any person or entity to file an administrative complaint with the FEC 

alleging that a violation of the federal campaign finance laws has occurred. Id. § 30109(a)(1). 

47. If the FEC does not act on a complaint within 120 days, the complainant has a right 

of action against the FEC. Id. § 30109(a)(8)(A). 

48. If the Court declares that the FEC’s failure to act on an administrative complaint is 

contrary to law, it may order the FEC to conform within 30 days by acting on the administrative 

complaint. Id. § 30109(a)(8)(C). If the FEC does not rule on the complaint within 30 days, the 

complainant may commence an action against the administrative respondent in federal court to 

remedy the FECA violations. Id. 

13 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case 1:22-cv-02139-TJK Document 14 Filed 10/14/22 Page 14 of 17 

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS 

49. On March 17, 2022, AB PAC, through its president Jessica Floyd, filed an 

administrative complaint with the FEC, naming Mr. Trump as the Respondent and presenting those 

of the above facts that were available to Plaintiff at the time. See generally Ex. 1. 

50. The administrative complaint argued that Mr. Trump reached a private decision to 

run for re-election by July 2021 and then repeatedly confirmed his intent. It pointed out that his 

statements about running for president were even firmer than those found by the FEC in past 

matters to indicate that an individual had made up their mind to run for office. Id. at 7 (citing 

Factual and Legal Analysis (“F&LA”) at 10, FEC Matter Under Review (“MUR”) 6999 (Larsen) 

(concluding that an individual’s statements that “it’s time to do it again” and “we’ll win this time” 

indicated a decision); F&LA at 8, FEC MUR 6449 (Bruning) (concluding that an individual’s 

statements such as “I want to run” and “I’m ready to run” indicated a decision)). 

51. The administrative complaint alleged that once Mr. Trump had decided to run for 

election, he could not avail himself of the testing-the-waters exemption. At the time he made his 

decision, the money that Save America and Save America Joint Fundraising Committee paid to 

promote Mr. Trump and attack President Biden, to the extent they could even be classified as 

testing-the-waters expenses in the first place, unquestionably became “expenditures.” All amounts 

spent for those purposes after the decision were also expenditures. Id. at 8. 

52. Further, by definition, the complaint said, Mr. Trump had consented to these 

expenditures. Id. (stating that because Save America is Mr. Trump’s leadership PAC, Mr. Trump 

“sponsors” the PAC and its joint fundraising efforts). Having decided to run for office and having 

consented to over $5,000 of expenditures, Mr. Trump was a “candidate” long before Plaintiff filed 

the administrative complaint. Id. at 9. Thus, the administrative complaint asserted that Mr. Trump 

14 
 

 

 

 

Case 1:22-cv-02139-TJK Document 14 Filed 10/14/22 Page 15 of 17 

violated FECA by failing to file a statement of candidacy, which would have designated a principal 

campaign committee, and file disclosure reports, as required by 52 U.S.C. §§ 30102(e)(1) and 

30104. Ex. 1 at 9-10. 

53. Additionally, the administrative complaint argued that Mr. Trump has accepted 

excessive contributions from his leadership PAC and a joint fundraising committee, because they 

spent more than $5,000 on Mr. Trump’s campaign between unreimbursed testing-the-waters 

expenses and expenses incurred to promote Mr. Trump’s election after he passed the candidacy 

threshold. The administrative complaint alleged that this violates 52 U.S.C. § 30116(f). Ex. 1 at 9. 

54. The FEC responded to the complaint with an acknowledgement letter dated March 

23, 2022, informing AB PAC that the proceeding would be designated MUR 7968. Ex. 2. 

55. Upon information and belief, the FEC has failed to act on Plaintiff’s administrative 

complaint for 211 days, exceeding the 120-day statutory response period. 

CAUSE OF ACTION 

Count I: 52 U.S.C. § 30109(a)(8)(A) 

56. Plaintiff repeats and realleges paragraphs 1-51 as if set forth fully herein. 

57. Defendant’s failure to act on Plaintiff’s administrative complaint is contrary to law 

under 52 U.S.C. § 30109(a)(8)(A), which provides Plaintiff a cause of action for “a failure of the 

Commission to act on such complaint during the 120-day period beginning on the date the 

complaint is filed.” 

REQUESTED RELIEF 

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff requests this Court: 

15 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case 1:22-cv-02139-TJK Document 14 Filed 10/14/22 Page 16 of 17 

(1) Declare that the FEC’s failure to act on Plaintiff’s administrative complaint was 

contrary to law under 52 U.S.C. § 30109(a)(8)(A); 

(2) Order the FEC to conform with this declaration within 30 days pursuant to 52 

U.S.C. § 30109(a)(8)(C); 

(3) Award Plaintiff its costs and reasonable attorneys’ fees incurred in this action; and 

(4) Grant such other relief as the Court may deem just and proper. 

Dated: October 14, 2022 Respectfully submitted, 

Aria C. Branch___ 

Aria C. Branch (D.C. Bar No. 1014541) 

Ezra W. Reese (D.C. Bar No. 487760) 

Abranch@elias.law 

Ereese@elias.law 

ELIAS LAW GROUP LLP 

10 G St. NE, Suite 600 

Washington, D.C. 20002 

Tel: (202) 968-4490 

16 
 

 

Case 1:22-cv-02139-TJK Document 14 Filed 10/14/22 Page 17 of 17 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

On October 14, 2022, I will electronically file the foregoing with the Clerk of Court using 

the CM/ECF system, which will then send a notification of such filing to the following: 

Lisa J. Stevenson 

Acting General Counsel 

lstevenson@fec.gov 

Kevin Deeley 

Associate General Counsel 

kdeeley@fec.gov 

Jacob Siler 

Assistant General Counsel 

jsiler@fec.gov 

Shaina Ward 

Attorney 

sward@fec.gov 

Federal Election Commission 

1050 First Street NE 

Washington, DC 20463 

(202) 694-1650 

Attorneys for Defendant 

Aria C. Branch 

Aria C. Branch 

17