Federal Election Commission 

Summary of Performance and Financial Information 

Fiscal Year 2015 
Federal Election Commission 

Summary of Performance and Financial Information 

Fiscal Year 2015 

Federal Election Commission 

999 E St. NW 

Washington, D.C. 20463 

(202) 694-1000 

1-(800) 424-9530 

www.fec.gov 

Released February 16, 2016 

 
Table	of	Contents

Management’s Discussion and Analysis 1 

Mission and Organizational Structure 1 

Mission Statement 2 

Organizational Structure 2 

Performance Goals, Objectives and Results 6 

Strategic Goal 6 

Strategic Objectives 6 

Analysis of FEC Financial Statements and Stewardship Information 14

Summary of Financial Statement Data 14

Summary of Significant Challenges 17
 

                                                            

Management’s Discussion and Analysis 

Mission and Organizational Structure 

The FEC is an independent regulatory agency responsible for administering, enforcing, 

defending and interpreting the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended (FECA or 

the Act).1

 Congress created the FEC to administer, enforce and formulate policy with respect 

to the FECA. The Act reflects Congress’s efforts to ensure that voters are fully informed of the 

sources of financial support for Federal candidates, political party committees, other political 

committees and other political actors. Public confidence in the political process depends not 

only on laws and regulations to ensure transparency, but also on the knowledge that those who 

disregard the campaign finance law will face consequences. 

Under the Act, all Federal political committees, including the committees of Presidential, 

Senate and House candidates, must file reports of receipts and disbursements. The FEC makes 

disclosure reports, and the data contained in them, available to the public through the 

Commission’s Internet-based public disclosure system on the Commission’s website, as well 

as in a public records office at the Commission's Washington, D.C. headquarters. The FEC 

also has exclusive responsibility for civil enforcement of the Act, and has litigating authority 

independent of the Department of Justice in U.S. district court and the courts of appeals. 

Additionally, the Commission promulgates regulations implementing the Act and issues 

advisory opinions responding to inquiries regarding interpretation and application of the Act 

and the Commission’s regulations. 

Additionally, the Commission is responsible for administering the Federal public funding 

programs for Presidential campaigns. This responsibility includes certifying and auditing all 

participating candidates and committees and enforcing the public funding laws. 

1

1

   The Commission’s primary responsibilities pertain to the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, Public Law 

92-225, 86 Stat. 3 (1972) as amended (codified at 52 U.S.C. §§ 30101-30145) (formerly at 2 U.S.C. §§ 431-55) 

(the Act or the FECA). The Commission’s responsibilities for the Federal public funding programs are 

contained in the Presidential Election Campaign Fund Act, Public Law 92-178, 85 Stat. 562 (1971) (codified 

at 26 U.S.C. §§ 9001-13) and the Presidential Primary Matching Payment Account Act, Public Law 93-

443, 88 Stat. 1297 (1974) (codified at 26 U.S.C. §§ 9031-42). 
Mission Statement 

The FEC’s mission is to protect the integrity of the Federal campaign finance process by 

providing transparency and fairly enforcing and administering Federal campaign finance laws.

 Organizational Structure 

To accomplish its legislative mandate, the FEC is directed by six Commissioners, who are 

appointed by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate. By law, no more than 

three Commissioners can be members of the same political party. Each member serves a sixyear term, and two seats are subject to appointment every two years. The Chairmanship of the 

Commission rotates among the members, with no member serving as Chair more than once 

during his or her term. The Commissioners are responsible for administering and enforcing 

the FECA and meet regularly to formulate policy and to vote on significant legal and 

administrative matters. The Act requires the affirmative vote of four members of the 

Commission to approve official actions, thus requiring bipartisan decision-making. The FEC 

has its headquarters in Washington, D.C. and does not have any regional offices. 

Figure 1: FEC Organizational Chart 

As noted in Figure 1, the offices of the Staff Director, General Counsel, Chief Information 

Officer and Chief Financial Officer support the agency in accomplishing its mission. The 

Office of the Inspector General, established within the FEC in 1989 under the 1988 

amendments to the Inspector General Act, is independent and reports both to the 

Commissioners and to Congress. The specific roles and responsibilities of each office are 

2
described in greater detail below. 

・ Office of the Staff Director (OSD) 

The Office of the Staff Director consists of four offices: 1) Management and Administration; 

2) Compliance; 3) Communications; and 4) Equal Employment Opportunity. The Office of 

Management and Administration is responsible for the FEC’s strategic planning and 

performance and works with the Commission to ensure the agency’s mission is met 

efficiently. In addition, this office houses the Commission Secretary, the Office of Human 

Resources (OHR) and the Administrative Services Division (ASD). The primary 

responsibilities of the Office of Compliance are review of campaign finance reports, audits, 

administrative fines and alternative dispute resolution. The Office of Communications 

includes divisions charged with making campaign finance reports available to the public, 

encouraging voluntary compliance with the Act through educational outreach and training and 

ensuring effective communication with Congress, executive branch agencies, the media and 

researchers and the general public. The Equal Employment Opportunity Office administers 

and ensures compliance with applicable laws, regulations, policies and guidance that prohibit 

discrimination in the Federal workplace based on race, color, national origin, religion, age, 

disability, sex, pregnancy, genetic information or retaliation. The EEO Officer reports to the 

Staff Director on administrative issues, but has direct reporting authority on all EEO matters. 

See 29 CFR 1614.102(b). 

・ Office of General Counsel (OGC) 

The Office of General Counsel consists of five organizational units: (1) the Deputy General 

Counsel—Administration; (2) the Deputy General Counsel—Law Division; (3) the Policy 

Division; (4) the Enforcement Division; and (5) the Litigation Division. The Deputy General 

Counsel—Administration directly supervises the Administrative Law Team, the Office of 

Complaints Examination and Legal Administration, the Law Library and all OGC 

administrative functions. The Deputy General Counsel—Law has the primary responsibility 

for assisting the General Counsel in all of the substantive aspects of the General Counsel’s 

duties and shares in the management of all phases of OGC programs, as well as directly 

supervises the Compliance Advice Team and the agency’s ethics program. The Policy 

Division drafts for Commission consideration advisory opinions and regulations interpreting 

the Federal campaign finance law. The Enforcement Division recommends to the Commission 

appropriate action to take with respect to administrative complaints and apparent violations of 

the Act. Where authorized, the Enforcement Division investigates alleged violations and 

negotiates conciliation agreements, which may include civil penalties and other remedies. If 

an enforcement matter does not resolve through conciliation during the administrative 

process, the Commission may authorize suit in district court, at which point the matter is 

transferred to the Litigation Division. The Litigation Division represents the Commission 

before the Federal district courts and courts of appeals in all civil litigation involving the 

campaign finance statutes. This Division assists the Department of Justice’s Office of the 

3
 

Solicitor General when the Commission’s FECA cases are before the Supreme Court. 

・ Office of the Chief Information Officer (OCIO) 

The Office of the Chief Information Officer (OCIO) consists of four units: (1) Enterprise 

Architecture; (2) Operational Support; (3) Data Administration; and (4) IT Security. The 

OCIO provides secure, stable and robust technology solutions for Commission staff and the 

public. OCIO both develops and maintains the systems that serve as the public's primary 

source of information about campaign finance data and law and ensures agency employees 

have a technology infrastructure that allows them to perform their day-to-day responsibilities 

administering and enforcing campaign finance laws. OCIO also develops and supports 

analytic reporting tools that help staff perform their disclosure and compliance duties.

・ Office of the Chief Financial Officer (OCFO) 

The Office of the Chief Financial Officer is responsible for complying with all financial 

management laws and standards, and all aspects of budget formulation, budget execution and 

procurement. 

Sources of Funds 

On an annual basis, the FEC receives a single appropriation for Salaries and Expenses. In FY 

2015, the FEC’s authorized funding level included an appropriation of $67,500,000. 

The FEC also has the authority to collect fees from attendees of agency-sponsored educational 

conferences. The Commission may use those fees to defray the costs of conducting those 

conferences. In an effort to keep the fees as low as possible, the agency has not fully exercised 

that authority. Rather, the Commission sets its registration fees at a level that covers only the 

costs incurred by the agency’s conference-management contractor, including meeting room 

rental and conference meals and compensation. All other conference-related expenses, such as 

materials and staff travel, are paid using appropriated funds. Registration fees for FY 2015 

were $110,875. 

4
   

Figure 2 shows the agency’s appropriations and obligations from FY 2011 to 2015. 

66.4

67.5

65.1

67.3

60

61

62

63

64

65

66

67

68

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Appropriation

Obligation

Figure 2: Summary of Funding (in millions of dollars) 

Personnel vs. Non-Personnel Costs 

Figure 3 represents the Commission’s FY 2015 obligations by personnel and non-personnel 

costs. Personnel costs, which are primarily composed of salaries and employee benefits, 

accounted for 68 percent of the FEC’s costs. The remaining 32 percent of the Commission’s 

costs was spent on non-personnel items, such as infrastructure and support, software and 

hardware, office rent, building security and other related costs. 

68.4%

SALARIES and

BENEFITS

OCIO

INITIATIVES

16.1%

FACILITIES 8.9% OTHER 6.6%

Figure 3: Fiscal Year 2015 by Major Category 

5
Performance Goals, Objectives and Results 

This section provides a summary of the results of the FEC’s key performance objectives, 

which are discussed in greater detail in the FEC’s FY 2015 APR. This report will be part of 

the FEC’s FY 2017 Congressional Budget Justification, which will be available at 

http://www.fec.gov/pages/budget/budget.shtml in February 2016. 

Strategic Goal 

The strategic goal of the Federal Election Commission is to fairly, efficiently and effectively 

administer and enforce the Federal Election Campaign Act, promote compliance and engage 

and inform the public about campaign finance data and rules, while maintaining a workforce 

that delivers results. 

Strategic Objectives 

The Act reflects a belief that democracy works best when voters can make informed decisions 

in the political process—decisions based in part on knowing the sources of financial support 

for Federal candidates, political party committees, other political committees and other 

political actors. As a result, the FEC’s first strategic objective is to inform the public about 

how Federal campaigns and committees are financed. Public confidence in the political 

process also depends on the knowledge that participants in Federal elections follow clear and 

well-defined rules and face real consequences for non-compliance. Thus, the FEC’s second 

strategic objective focuses on the Commission’s efforts to promote voluntary compliance 

through educational outreach and to enforce campaign finance laws effectively and fairly. The 

third strategic objective is to interpret the FECA and related statutes, providing timely 

guidance to the public regarding the requirements of the law. The Commission also 

understands that organizational performance is driven by employee performance and that the 

agency cannot successfully achieve its mission without a high-performing workforce that 

understands expectations and delivers results. The FEC’s fourth strategic objective is to foster 

a culture of high performance in order to ensure that the agency delivers its mission efficiently 

and effectively. 

Objective 1: Engage and Inform the Public about Campaign Finance Data 

The FEC provides the public with campaign finance disclosure information necessary to make 

educated, informed decisions in the political process based on data concerning the sources and 

amounts of funds used to finance Federal elections. In order to ensure that this data is quickly 

available and fully accessible to the public, the agency is committed to ensuring that 

information is easy to view, sort and download from the FEC website and that FEC staff have 

the tools and knowledge to help the public find and understand the campaign finance 

information relevant to their questions and needs. 

The FEC’s e-filing system acts as the point of entry for submission of electronically filed 

campaign finance reports, providing faster access to reports and streamlining operations. 

6
                                                            

 

Specifically, the system provides for public disclosure of electronically filed reports, via the 

FEC website, within minutes of being filed. When a committee files a financial disclosure 

report on paper, the Commission ensures that a copy is available for public inspection within 

48 hours of receipt, both electronically on the website and at the FEC’s offices in Washington, 

D.C.2 The eFiling platform is a crucial component of the Commission’s campaign finance 

disclosure system. During the 2013-2014 election cycle, over 8,000 committees and other 

filers used the eFiling platform to file campaign finance disclosure reports. 

The FEC is committed to providing timely and transparent campaign finance disclosure to the 

public and delivering data in accessible and easy-to-use formats. The FEC has launched an 

initiative to develop an automated data capture process to convert paper-filed reports into 

structured, machine-readable data. Automating this labor-intensive process will decrease data 

processing time, increase the accuracy of data and reduce the overall costs of capturing data 

from paper forms. 

The Commission is also currently redesigning its website, in part, to increase the public’s 

access to and understanding of the agency’s extensive data offerings. In partnership with 18F, 

a newly formed data services delivery team within the General Services Administration 

(GSA), the FEC is developing a user centered online platform to deliver campaign finance 

information to its diverse base of users. Once complete, the redesigned FEC website will 

better meet the needs of an audience that spans from individual citizens seeking information 

about the candidates on the ballot in their state to journalists and researchers who specialize in 

campaign finance issues, to filers and other political participants seeking legal guidance and 

compliance information. The FEC provides the public with a wealth of complex information, 

including current and historical campaign finance data, detailed information regarding the 

requirements of the campaign finance law and legal resources, such as advisory opinions 

issued by the Commission and information on closed enforcement matters. This multiyear 

effort will ensure that the FEC provides full and meaningful campaign finance data and 

information in a manner that meets the public’s increasing expectations for data customization 

and ease of use. 

The FEC’s first new offerings as a result of its website redesign project are a publicly 

available application programming interface (API) to increase public access to campaign 

finance data and an online tool to help filers and the general public better understand filing 

requirements and deadlines. The new API and online tool, created in collaboration with 18F, 

supplement the campaign finance data offerings developed and maintained by FEC staff. The 

Commission continues to provide detailed and comprehensive campaign finance data through 

the Candidate and Committee Viewer and the Data Catalog. During Presidential election 

2 The Commission’s mandatory electronic filing (“e-filing”) rules require any committee that receives contributions 

or makes expenditures in excess of $50,000 in a calendar year, or that has reason to expect to do so, to submit its 

reports electronically. Under the Act, these mandatory e-filing provisions apply to any political committee or other 

person required to file reports, statements or designations with the FEC, except for Senate candidate committees 

(and certain other persons who support Senate candidates only). 

7
years, users can access through the Presidential Map the amount of funds raised on a state-bystate basis, contributions, cash-on-hand and the distribution of contributions by amount with a 

simple click at www.fec.gov. Users can also access lists of contributors by name, city and 

amounts of contributions within the first three digits of any zip code. Contribution and 

disbursement data are updated within one day of the FEC’s receipt of electronically filed 

disclosure reports. The Candidate and Committee Viewer, the House and Senate Map and the 

Data Catalog are updated nightly with all data that have been entered into the Commission's 

database. Generally, summary financial data are available the day following receipt of the 

report. Transactions—detailed information about receipts and disbursements—are processed 

on a rolling basis and added to the Commission's database nightly. The agency also provides a 

Compliance Map to assist members of the public in their efforts to comply with campaign 

finance law. The Compliance Map lists all reporting dates and other significant information 

tied to each state’s election calendar, such as the time periods when special requirements for 

electioneering communications and Federal election activity apply. Like the interactive 

Disclosure Map of contribution information, the Compliance Map provides quick access to 

information on a state-by-state basis in an easy-to-use format. 

The level of availability and accessibility of campaign finance data serves as a measurement 

of success in improving the public’s access to information about how campaign funds are 

raised and spent. 

Performance Goal 1-1: Improve the public’s access to information about how campaign 

funds are raised and spent. 

Key Indicator: Enhanced availability of campaign finance data as measured by 

increased capabilities to retrieve and analyze data. 

FY 2010 

Actual 

FY 2011 

Actual 

FY 2012 

Actual 

FY 2013 

Actual 

FY 2014 

Actual 

FY 2015 

Target 

FY 2015 

Actual 

FY 2016 

Target 

FY 2017 

Target 

N/A N/A N/A N/A 75% 75% 86% 75% 75% 

Objective 2: Promote Compliance with the FECA and Related Statutes 

Helping the public understand its obligations under the Act is an essential component of 

voluntary compliance. The FEC places a significant emphasis on encouraging compliance 

through its Information Division, Reports Analysis Division (RAD), Press Office and Office 

of Congressional, Legislative and Intergovernmental Affairs. The FEC measures its progress 

in meeting this Objective through two performance measures: one that measures the agency’s 

efforts to encourage voluntary compliance through educational outreach and information and 

another that measures the FEC’s efforts to seek adherence to FECA requirements through fair, 

effective and timely enforcement and compliance programs. Progress against these measures 

is detailed in the charts below. 

8
Encourage voluntary compliance with FECA requirements through educational outreach 

and information. 

The FEC’s education and outreach programs provide information necessary for compliance 

with the campaign finance law and give the public the context necessary to interpret the 

campaign finance data filers disclose. The FEC maintains a toll-free line and public email 

accounts to respond to inquiries regarding campaign finance data disclosed to the public and 

questions about how to comply with the campaign finance law and its reporting requirements. 

The FEC also operates Press and Congressional Affairs offices. 

One way the Commission encourages voluntary compliance is by hosting conferences across 

the country, where Commissioners and staff explain how the Act applies to candidates, parties 

and political action committees. These conferences address recent changes in the law and 

focus on fundraising, methods of candidate support and reporting regulations. 

The FEC also devotes considerable resources to ensuring that staff can provide distance 

learning opportunities to the public. The Commission’s website is one of the most important 

sources of instantly accessible information about the Act, Commission regulations and 

Commission proceedings. In addition to viewing campaign finance data, anyone with Internet 

access can use the website to track Commission rulemakings, search advisory opinions, audits 

and closed enforcement matters, view campaign finance data and find reporting dates. The 

Commission places a high emphasis on providing educational materials about the campaign 

finance law and its requirements. Toward this end, the FEC has moved its focus away from 

the printing and manual distribution of its educational materials and instead looked for ways 

to leverage available technologies to create and disseminate dynamic and up-to-date 

educational materials through the website. While the Commission continues to make available 

printed copies of its educational brochures and publications, transitioning to primarily webbased media has allowed the agency to reduce significantly its printing and mailing costs and 

use of resources while at the same time encouraging new and expanded ways of 

communicating with the public via the website. 

As part of this broad effort to improve its Internet communications and better serve the 

educational needs of the public, the Commission maintains an E-Learning section on its 

Educational Outreach web page and its own YouTube channel, which can be found at 

http://www.youtube.com/FECTube. The E-Learning page offers instructional videos and 

tutorials, as well as interactive presentations that enable users to obtain guidance tailored to 

their specific activities. The curriculum currently includes a variety of presentations about the 

Commission and the campaign finance law. 

The agency’s educational outreach program has been significantly enhanced with the addition 

of an online training service that enables political committees and other groups to schedule 

live, interactive online training sessions with FEC staff. This on-demand service allows the 

FEC to provide tailored, distance learning presentations and training to the public in a manner 

that will significantly increase the availability of FEC staff to serve the public. The service 

9
 

also offers an efficient and effective way for alternative dispute resolution and other 

enforcement respondents to satisfy the terms of their agreements with the agency. The FEC 

has historically measured the success of its educational outreach programs based on 

satisfaction surveys of conference attendees. Beginning in FY 2014, the agency initiated a 

program to measure user satisfaction across all aspects of its outreach program. 

Performance Goal 2-1: Encourage voluntary compliance with FECA requirements through 

educational outreach and information. 

 

Seek adherence to FECA requirements through fair, effective and timely enforcement and 

compliance programs. 

The FEC has set strategies for ensuring that its enforcement and compliance programs are 

fair, effective and timely. The Commission’s statutory obligation is to administer, interpret 

and enforce the Federal Election Campaign Act, which serves the compelling governmental 

interest in deterring corruption and the appearance of corruption in financing elections. In 

doing so, the Commission remains mindful of the First Amendment’s guarantees of freedom 

of speech and association, and the practical implication of its actions on the political process. 

The FEC has exclusive jurisdiction over civil enforcement of Federal campaign finance laws. 

It consults with the U.S. Department of Justice, as appropriate, on matters involving both civil 

and criminal enforcement of the Act. Commission enforcement actions, which are handled 

primarily by the Office of General Counsel (OGC), originate from a number of sources, 

including external complaints, referrals from other government agencies and matters 

generated by information ascertained by the Commission in the normal course of carrying out 

its supervisory responsibilities. Enforcement matters are handled by OGC pursuant to the 

requirements of the FECA. If the Commission cannot settle or conciliate a matter involving an 

alleged violation of the Act, the Commission may initiate civil litigation by filing and 

prosecuting a civil action in Federal district court to address the alleged violation. Closed 

enforcement matters are available online through the Commission’s Enforcement Query 

System at http://eqs.fec.gov/eqs/searcheqs. 

10

Key Indicator: Percent of educational outreach programs (webinars, seminars, 

publications and E-Learning presentations) and events that achieve targeted 

satisfaction rating on user surveys. 

FY 2010 

Actual 

FY 2011 

Actual 

FY 2012 

Actual 

FY 2013 

Actual 

FY 2014 

Actual 

FY 2015 

Target 

FY 2015 

Actual 

FY 2016 

Target 

N/A N/A N/A N/A Develop

methods for 

surveying 

user 

satisfaction 

with 

webinars, 

publications 

and ELearning 

presentations. 

4.0 or 

higher on 

a 5.0 

scale 

4.34 4.0 or 

higher on 

a 5.0 

scale 

4.0 or 

higher 

on a 5.0 

scale 

FY 2016 

Target 
To augment OGC’s traditional enforcement role, the Office of Compliance manages several 

programs that seek to remedy alleged violations of the Act and encourage voluntary 

compliance. These programs include: 1) the Alternative Dispute Resolution Program, 2) the 

Administrative Fine Program and 3) the Audit Program. The Commission’s Alternative 

Dispute Resolution Program is designed to resolve matters more swiftly by encouraging the 

settlement of less-complex enforcement matters with a streamlined process that focuses on 

remedial measures for candidates and political committees, such as training, internal audits 

and hiring compliance staff. Violations involving the late submission of, or failure to file, 

disclosure reports are subject to the Administrative Fine Program. This Program is 

administered by RAD and the Office of Administrative Review (OAR), which assess 

monetary penalties and handle challenges to the penalty assessments. The Audit Program 

conducts “for cause” audits under the FECA in those cases where political committees have 

failed to meet the threshold requirements for demonstrating substantial compliance with the 

Act, and conducts mandatory audits under the public funding statutes. Threshold requirements 

approved by the Commission and used by RAD and the Audit Division are public, subject to 

limited redactions. 

Performance Goal 2-2: Seek adherence to FECA requirements through fair, effective and 

timely enforcement and compliance programs. 

 

Objective 3: Interpret the FECA and Related Statutes 

The Commission responds to questions from the public about how the Act applies to specific 

situations by issuing advisory opinions (AO). In addition, Commission initiatives, 

Congressional action, judicial decisions, petitions for rulemaking or other changes in 

campaign finance law may necessitate that the Commission update or adopt new regulations. 

Consequently, the FEC undertakes rulemakings either to write new Commission regulations 

or revise existing regulations. The FEC has set as a performance goal to provide timely legal 

guidance to the public. 

Regulations 

The Policy Division of OGC drafts various rulemaking documents, including Notices of 

Proposed Rulemaking (NPRMs), for Commission consideration. NPRMs provide an 

opportunity for the public to review proposed regulations, submit written comments to the 

Commission and, when appropriate, testify at public hearings at the FEC. The Commission 

considers the comments and testimony and deliberates publicly regarding the adoption of the 

11

Key Indicator: Of the enforcement matters resolved during the fiscal year, the 

percentage that was resolved within 15 months of the date of receipt. 

FY 2010 

Actual 

FY 2011 

Actual 

FY 2012 

Actual 

FY 2013 

Actual 

FY 2014 

Actual 

FY 2015 

Target 

FY 2015 

Actual 

FY 2016 

Target 

FY 2017 

Target 

75% 89% 70% 72% 28% 75% 48% 75% 75%
final regulations and the corresponding Explanations and Justifications, which provide the 

rationale and basis for the new or revised regulations. 

Advisory Opinions 

Advisory opinions (AO) are official Commission responses to questions regarding the 

application of Federal campaign finance law to specific factual situations. The Act requires the 

Commission to respond to AO requests within 60 days. For AO requests from candidates in 

the two months leading up to an election, the Act requires the Commission to respond within 

20 days. On its own initiative, the Commission also makes available an expedited process for 

handling certain time-sensitive requests that are not otherwise entitled to expedited processing 

under the Act. The Commission strives to issue these advisory opinions in 30 days. 

Defending Challenges to the Act 

The Commission represents itself in most litigation before the Federal district courts and 

courts of appeals and before the Supreme Court with respect to cases involving publicly 

financed Presidential candidates. It also has primary responsibility for defending the Act and 

Commission regulations against court challenges. In addition, the FECA authorizes the 

Commission to institute civil actions to enforce the FECA. 

12
                                                            

 

 

Performance Goal 3-1: Provide timely legal guidance to the public. 

Key Indicator: Percent of legal guidance provided within statutory and courtordered deadlines. 

FY 2010 

Actual 

FY 2011 

Actual 

FY 2012 

Actual 

FY 2013 

Actual 

FY 2014 

Actual 

FY 2015 

Target 

FY 2015 

Actual 

FY 2016 

Target 

FY 2017 

Target 

N/A N/A N/A N/A 100%3 100% 100%4 100% 100% 

Objective 4: Foster a Culture of High Performance 

One of the management objectives from the FEC’s Strategic Plan, FY 2014-2019, Foster a 

Culture of High Performance, cuts across the organization and reflects the agency’s strategic 

priorities for improving the efficiency and effectiveness of its workforce and management 

processes. The Commission understands that the success of its programs depends upon the 

skills and commitment of its staff. A focus for the Commission is to ensure that staff training 

needs are assessed and met at every level of the agency and that agency leaders receive 

training necessary to help manage and maintain a fully engage and productive workforce. 

The FEC is also participating in and contributing to the government-wide Records 

Management initiative. In compliance with the Federal Records Act, the FEC is updating its 

records management program. The updated program will increase efficiency and improve 

performance by eliminating paper and using electronic recordkeeping to the fullest extent 

possible. 

Performance Goal 4-1: Foster a workforce that delivers results. 

Key Indicator: Commission-required quarterly updates meet targeted performance 

goals. 

FY 2010 

Actual 

FY 2011 

Actual 

FY 2012 

Actual 

FY 2013 

Actual 

FY 2014 

Actual 

FY 2015 

Target 

FY 2015 

Actual 

FY 2016 

Target 

FY 2017 

Target 

N/A N/A N/A N/A 73% 60% 80% 65% 65% 

3 The Commission obtained extensions to consider ten advisory opinion requests in FY 2014; four of those 

extensions were attributable to the Federal government shutdown during October 2013. The Commission did not 

have any rulemakings during FY 2014 with statutory or court-ordered deadlines. 4 The Commission obtained extensions to consider two advisory opinion requests in FY 2015. The Commission did 

not have any rulemakings during FY 2015 with statutory or court-ordered deadlines. 

13
 

 

 

 

Analysis of FEC Financial Statements and Stewardship Information 

The FEC’s FY 2015 financial statements and notes are presented in the required format in 

accordance with OMB Circular A-136, as revised, Financial Reporting Requirements. The 

FEC’s current-year financial statements and notes are presented in a comparative format in 

Section II of the Agency Financial Report. 

The following table summarizes the significant changes in the FEC’s financial position during 

FY 2015: 

Net Financial 

Condition FY 2015 FY 2014 Increase (Decrease) 

% 

Change 

Assets $ 17,056,461.67 $ 16,181,802.18 $ 874,659.49 5.41% 

Liabilities $ 5,924,714.17 $ 6,062,608.82 $ (137,894.65) -2.27% 

Net Position $ 11,131,747.50 $ 10,119,193.36 $ 1,012,554.14 10.01% 

Net Cost $ 68,213,708.70 $ 65,789,981.48 $ 2,423,727.22 3.68% 

Budgetary Resources $ 71,084,848.49 $ 69,492,381.82 $ 1,592,466.67 2.29% 

Custodial Revenue $ 778,018.51 $ 549,586.76 $ 228,431.75 41.56% 

The following is a brief description of the nature of each required financial statement and its 

relevance. The effects of some significant balances or conditions on the FEC’s operations are 

explained. 

Summary of Financial Statement Data 

Balance Sheet 

The Balance Sheet presents the total amounts available for use by the FEC (assets) against the 

amounts owed (liabilities) and amounts that comprise the difference (Net Position). As a small 

independent agency, all of the FEC’s assets consist of Fund Balance with Treasury (FBWT), 

Property and Equipment (P&E) and Accounts Receivable. Fund Balance with Treasury (e.g., 

cash) is available through the Department of Treasury accounts, from which the FEC is 

authorized to make expenditures (i.e., obligations) and payments. FBWT increased by 

approximately $774 thousand, or 6.38 percent, from the prior year. 

Accounts Receivable primarily represent amounts due from the public for fines and penalties 

assessed by the FEC and referred to Treasury for collection, as deemed appropriate. In 

compliance with the Debt Collection Improvement Act of 1996 (DCIA), the OCFO takes into 

consideration the most appropriate approach to debt management. These amounts are not 

available for FEC operations and are sent to the U.S. Treasury as miscellaneous receipts. Net 

accounts receivable increased by approximately $518 from FY 2014. 

Property and equipment consists of software, general-purpose equipment used by the agency 

14
and software development. In FY 2015, the FEC continued to evaluate existing systems and 

retired outdated software systems, and initiated a series of upgrades to existing systems to 

support regulated reporting requirements. Net property and equipment increased by $97 

thousand from FY 2014 to $4 million. Total liabilities decreased by approximately two 

percent. 

Statement of Net Cost 

The Statement of Net Cost presents the annual cost of operating the FEC program. Gross costs 

are used to arrive at the total net cost of operations. The FEC’s total gross costs in 

administering the FECA did not experience significant fluctuation from FY 2014, as there was 

a 3.6 percent change from FY 2014 to FY 2015. This is supported by the agency’s having 

experienced only a slight fluctuation – about three percent – in net appropriations from the 

prior year. 

Statement of Changes in Net Position 

The Statement of Changes in Net Position presents in greater detail the net position section of 

the Balance Sheet, including Cumulative Results of Operations and Unexpended 

Appropriations. This statement identifies the activity that caused the net position to change 

during the reporting period. Total Net Position increased by 10 percent, or approximately 

$1.01 million. 

Statement of Budgetary Resources 

The Statement of Budgetary Resources provides information on the source and status of 

budgetary resources made available to the FEC during the reporting period. It presents the 

relationship between budget authority and budget outlays, as well as the reconciliation of 

obligations to total outlays. Total Budgetary Resources and Status of Budgetary Resources 

increased by approximately $1.59 million, or 2.29 percent, from FY 2014. This included a 

2.47 percent increase in obligations incurred. 

Statement of Custodial Activity 

The Statement of Custodial Activity (SCA) represents an accounting of revenue and funds 

collected by the FEC that are owed to the U.S. Treasury’s general fund. These monies are not 

available for the FEC’s use. Collection and revenue activity primarily result from enforcement 

actions that come before the Commission during the fiscal year. Revenue and collections on 

the SCA consist of collections on new assessments, prior year(s) receivables and 

Miscellaneous Receipts. In FY 2015, the total custodial revenue and collections increased by 

approximately $228 thousand, or 41.56 percent, from FY 2014. 

15
                                                            

           

     

The chart below displays the assessment history for the past 20 years5 . 

$1.96

$6.71

$0.73

FY 1995 FY 2015

FIGURE 4 ‐ FINES ASSESSED, BY FISCAL YEAR

(in Millions of Dollars)

Figure 4: Fines Assessed, by Fiscal Year (in millions of dollars) 

16

5 

   One MUR resolved during 2006 yielded the largest civil penalty in agency history, which was $3.8 million paid by 

Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac) for prohibited corporate activity. This 2006 penalty is the 

primary reason for the largest Fines Assessed (approximately $6.71 million) in Figure 4. 
Summary of Significant Challenges 

The Inspector General’s report in Section III of the Agency Financial Report identifies three 

areas specific to management and performance challenges: 1) Information Technology Project 

Planning and Management, 2) Governance Framework and 3) Human Capital Management / 

Human Resources Operations. The agency continues its efforts to adhere to Directive 50, 

addressing project management requirements and creating corrective action plans (CAP) and 

creating project plans for specific CAP items. The FEC also continues to make significant 

progress in its human capital management and operations. The FEC’s full response to the 

Inspector General’s assessment of its performance in these areas appears in Section III of the 

Agency Financial Report. The report is available online at 

http://www.fec.gov/pages/budget/fy2015/FY2015_AFR.pdf. 

An online version of this Summary of Performance and Financial Information may be found 

online at http://www.fec.gov/pages/budget/budget.shtml. 

17