alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.4
​
SECOND AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
​
THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (the “Amendment”) is made effective as of this 1st day of April 2020 (the “Amendment Effective Date”) by and between GERALD MCLAUGHLIN (“Executive”) and NEOS THERAPEUTICS, INC., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”).  Company and the Executive collectively are referred to as the “Parties.”
BACKGROUND
WHEREAS, the Executive is a party to an Employment Agreement with the Company dated as of June 27, 2018, which was subsequently amended on October 1, 2019 (collectively, the “Employment Agreement”); and
WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive desire to amend his Employment Agreement as provided herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises herein contained and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, and intending to be legally bound hereby, the Company and the Executive hereto agree as follows:
(1)        Terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Employment Agreement.
(2)        Paragraph 4(c) of the Employment Agreement hereby is amended to add the following section (v) as of the Amendment Effective Date:
(v)  Any stock options shall remain exercisable with respect to such vested shares for fifteen (15) months following the Effective Date of the Separation Agreement and Release (but in no event beyond the expiration date of such options).
​
(3)        The Parties agree to execute such further instruments and to take such further action as may be reasonably necessary to carry out the intent of this Amendment.
​
(4)        This Amendment together with the Employment Agreement constitute the complete agreement of the Company and the Executive hereto with respect to the subject matters referred to herein and supersedes all prior or contemporaneous negotiations, promises, covenants, agreements or representations of every nature whatsoever with respect thereto.  This Amendment cannot be amended, modified or supplemented with respect to the Executive except by an instrument in writing executed by the Company and the Executive.
​
(5)        The terms of this Amendment shall be binding upon, and shall inure to the benefit of the Executive, the Company and their respective successors and assigns.   Except as
​



provided in this Amendment, all other terms and conditions contained in the Employment Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.
​
(6)        This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, but all of which together shall constitute but one and the same instrument.
​
[SIGNATURES ON NEXT PAGE]
​



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each Party has executed this Amendment, in the case of the Company by its duly authorized officer, as of the Amendment Effective Date.
​
	​


	​


	​


	​



	COMPANY:
	​

	​
	​

	NEOS THERAPEUTICS, INC.
	​

	​
	​

	By:
	 /s/ Richard Eisenstadt
	​

	​
	Name:
	Richard Eisenstadt
	​

	​
	Title:
	Chief Financial Officer
	​

	​
	​

	​
	​

	EXECUTIVE:
​
	​

	 /s/ Gerald McLaughlin
	​

	Gerald McLaughlin
	​

	​
	​



​
```

[109th Congress Public Law 240]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ240.109]

[[Page 120 STAT. 515]]

Public Law 109-240
109th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To amend section 242 of the National Housing Act to extend the exemption 
    for critical access hospitals under the FHA program for mortgage 
    insurance for hospitals. <<NOTE: July 10, 2006 -  [H.R. 4912]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, <<NOTE: Rural Health 
Care Capital Access Act of 2006.>> 

SECTION 1. <<NOTE: 12 USC 1701 note.>> SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Rural Health Care Capital Access Act 
of 2006''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION.

    Paragraph (1) of section 242(i) of the National Housing Act (12 
U.S.C. 1715z-7(i)(1)) is amended by striking ``July 31, 2006'' and 
inserting ``July 31, 2011''.

    Approved July 10, 2006.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 4912:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 109-424 (Comm. on Financial Services).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 152 (2006):
            May 9, considered and passed House.
            June 28, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
Exhibit
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Kingsway Capital, Inc. (the "Company")
      on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report'), I, Bia
      Mac, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





March
      30,
      2007








/s/
      Bia Mac


Bia
      Mac


Chief
      Executive Officer
<PAGE>   1

                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.3

                     AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE UTI ENERGY CORP.
               AMENDED AND RESTATED 1997 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN
               ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS ON APRIL 27, 2000

         RESOLVED, that an amendment to the UTI Energy Corp. Amended and
Restated 1997 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the "1997 Plan"), to increase the number
of shares authorized for issuance under the 1997 Plan by 400,000 is hereby
authorized, ratified and approved.
49–008 

109TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2d Session 109–606 

WAIVING A REQUIREMENT OF CLAUSE 6(a) OF RULE XIII WITH RESPECT 

TO THE SAME DAY CONSIDERATION OF CERTAIN RESOLUTIONS REPORTED BY THE RULES COMMITTEE 

JULY 27, 2006.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mr. HASTINGS of Washington, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 958] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 958, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House 

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution waives clause 6(a) of rule XIII (requiring a twothirds vote to consider a rule on the same day it is reported from 

the Rules Committee) against certain resolutions reported from the 

Rules Committee. The rule applies the waiver to any special rule 

reported on the legislative day of July 28, 2006, providing for consideration or disposition of any of the following measures: 

(1) A conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 2830) to 

amend the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 and 

the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to reform the pension funding 

rules, and for other purposes; 

(2) A bill to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the unified credit against the estate tax to an exclusion 

equivalent of $5,000,000, to repeal the sunset provision for the estate and generation-skipping taxes, and to extend expiring provisions, and for other purposes; and 

(3) A bill to provide economic security for all Americans, and for 

other purposes. 

Æ 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with HEARING
#### Frances Morris et al., as Executors of Joachim De Comps, Deceased, Appellants, *v.*Theophilus Wucher, Respondent.

(Argued March 8, 1907;

decided April 2, 1907.)

' *Morris*v. *Wucher,*115 App. Div. 278, affirmed.

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Codrt in the first judicial department, entered November 21,19Q6, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at a Trial Term without a jury in an action to recover money alleged to have been loaned.

*Simon Sultan*for appellants.

*Paul Fuller, Jr.,*and *Frederic P. Goudert*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Gray, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Hiscock, JJ. Not voting: Cullen, Ch. J., and Chase,-JJ.
EX 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of AS-IP Tech, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending September 30, 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), Philip A. Shiels, Chief Executive Officer of the Company does hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to his knowledge:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/    Philip A. Shiels

Philip A. Shiels

Chief Executive Officer

 

[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to AS-IP Tech, Inc. and will be retained by AS-IP Tech, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]
Case 16-27007 Doc 1 Filed 08/23/16 Entered 08/23/16 11:29:34 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 10
Case 16-27007 Doc 1 Filed 08/23/16 Entered 08/23/16 11:29:34 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 10
Case 16-27007 Doc 1 Filed 08/23/16 Entered 08/23/16 11:29:34 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 10
Case 16-27007 Doc 1 Filed 08/23/16 Entered 08/23/16 11:29:34 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 10
Case 16-27007 Doc 1 Filed 08/23/16 Entered 08/23/16 11:29:34 Desc Main

 Document Page 5 of 10
Case 16-27007 Doc 1 Filed 08/23/16 Entered 08/23/16 11:29:34 Desc Main

 Document Page 6 of 10
Case 16-27007 Doc 1 Filed 08/23/16 Entered 08/23/16 11:29:34 Desc Main

 Document Page 7 of 10
Case 16-27007 Doc 1 Filed 08/23/16 Entered 08/23/16 11:29:34 Desc Main

 Document Page 8 of 10
Case 16-27007 Doc 1 Filed 08/23/16 Entered 08/23/16 11:29:34 Desc Main

 Document Page 9 of 10
Case 16-27007 Doc 1 Filed 08/23/16 Entered 08/23/16 11:29:34 Desc Main

 Document Page 10 of 10
§ 902.31 Access, inspection and copying. ( a ) Records listed in § 902.30(a), are available for inspection and copying by any person at the Corporation's office, 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Suite 1220 North, Washington, DC 20004. Facilities for inspection and copying shall be open to the public every workday.
( b ) Records listed in § 902.30(a), that are published and offered for sale, shall be indexed as required under § 902.13, and shall be available for public inspection. Records offered for sale will not be copied by the Corporation for the requester without the approval of the Administrative Officer.
( c ) Records listed in § 902.30(a) are subject to subpart F of this part and access may be restricted by the Corporation in accordance with that subpart. A refusal to disclose may be appealed by the requester under the provisions of subpart H of this part.
[41 FR 43143, Sept. 30, 1976, as amended at 48 FR 17354, Apr. 22, 1983; 50 FR 45824, Nov. 4, 1985]
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsCompression Response of a Sandwich Fuselage Keel Panel With and Without DamageResults are presented from an experimental and analytical study of a sandwich fuselage keel panel with and without damage. The fuselage keel panel is constructed of graphite-epoxy skins bonded to a honeycomb core, and is representative of a highly loaded fuselage keel structure. The face sheets of the panel contain several terminated or dropped plies along the length of the panel. The results presented provide a better understanding of the load distribution in damaged and undamaged thick-face-sheet composite sandwich structure with dropped plies and of the failure mechanisms of such structure in the presence of low-speed impact damage and discrete-source damage. The impact-damage condition studied corresponds to barely visible impact damage (BVID), and the discrete-source damage condition studied is a notch machined through both face sheets. Results are presented from an impact-damage screening study conducted on another panel of the same design to determine the impact energy necessary to inflict BVID on the panel. Results are presented from compression tests of the panel in three conditions: undamaged; BVID in two locations; and BVID in two locations and a notch through both face sheets. Surface strains in the face sheets of the undamaged panel and the notched panel obtained experimentally are compared with finite element analysis results. The experimental and analytical results suggest that for the damage conditions studied, discrete-source damage influences the structural performance more than BVID.Document ID19970013658Acquisition SourceLangley Research CenterDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsMcGowan, David M.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA United States)*Ambur, Damodar R.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateFebruary 1, 1997Subject CategoryStructural MechanicsReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-110302NAS 1.15:110302Meeting InformationMeeting: Advanced Composites TechnologyLocation: Anaheim, CACountry: United StatesStart Date: August 7, 1995End Date: August 11, 1995Sponsors:Department of Defense,Advanced Research Projects AgencyAccession Number97N17376Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 538-10-11-05Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19970013658.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

ONE HUNDRED FIRST CONGRESS 

Convened January 3, 1989 

FIRST SESSION { 

SECOND SESSION { 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Monday, June 12, 1989 

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF WALTER J.STEWART, 

SECRETARY OF THE SENATE 

By Gerald A. Hackett, Executive Clerk 
1 

NOMINATIONS 

Calendar Message Nominee, Office, And Predecessor Reported 

No. No. Bv 

AMBASSADOR 

* 112 199 Joseph Verner Reed, of Connecticut, for the May 10, 89 Mr. Pell, 

rank of Ambassador during his tenure of Committee on Foreign 

service as Chief of Protocol for the White Relations, without printed 

House. report. 

DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

* 140 289 Peter F. Secchia, of Michigan, to be May 17, 89 Mr. Pell, 

Ambassador Extraordinary and Committee on Foreign 

Plenipotentiary of the United States of Relations, without printed 

America to Italy. report. 

* 170 177 John D. Negroponte, of New York, a Career Jun 8, 89 Mr. Pell, 

Member of the Senior Foreign Service, Committee on Foreign 

Class of Career Minister, to be Ambassador Relations, without printed 

Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary of the report. 

United States of America to Mexico. 

* 171 326 Chic Hecht, of Nevada, to be Ambassador Do. 

Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary of the 

United States of America to the 

Commonwealth of The Bahamas. 

* 172 337 Bernard William Aronson, of Maryland, to be Do. 

an Assistant Secretary of State, vice 

Elliott Abrams, resigned. 

* 173 352 John Hubert Kelly, of Georgia. a Career Do. 

Member of the Senior Foreign Service, 

Class of Minister-Counselor, to be an 

Assistant Secretary of State, vice Richard 

W. Murphy, resigned. 
2 

Calendar Message Nominee, Office, And Predecessor Reported 

* 

No. No. Bv 

AMBASSADOR 

174 228 Richard Reeves Burt, of Arizona, for the Jun 8, 89 Mr. Pell, 

rank of Ambassador during his tenure of Committee on Foreign 

service as Head of Delegation on Nuclear Relations, with printed 

and Space Talks and Chief Negotiator on report with additional 

Strategic Nuclear Arms (START). views - Ex.Rept. 101-7. .. *S1gntf1es nominee's commitment to respond to requests to appear and testify before any duly 

constituted committee of the Senate.
§ 223.130 Scope. ( a ) This subpart prescribes policies and procedures governing the debarment and suspension of purchasers of National Forest System timber. This subpart further prescribes policies and procedures governing those persons who violate the Forest Resources Conservation and Shortage Relief Act of 1990 (16 U.S.C. 620, *et seq.*).
( b ) It provides for the listing of debarred and suspended purchasers.
( c ) It sets forth the causes and procedures for debarment and suspension and for determining the scope, duration, and treatment to be accorded to purchasers listed as debarred or suspended.
[52 FR 43329, Nov. 12, 1987, as amended at 60 FR 46921, Sept. 8, 1995]
ATTACHMENT 10
Placeholder: Confidential Business Information item

Golden Refrigerant CBI Comment on 2-2-12

For more information please contact David Donaldson by phone at 202-343-9086 or by email at 

donaldson.david@epa.gov.
**CERTIFICATION OF  CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND  CHIEF FINANCIAL  OFFICER  PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C.  SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED  PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF  THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In  connection with the annual Report of Bioflamex Corporation (the “Company”) on  Form 10-K for the year ended February 28, 2011 filed with the Securities and  Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Kristian Schiorring, Chief Executive  Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18  U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that: 

| 1. | The Report fully complies with the      requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The information contained in the      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial      condition of the Company as of the dates presented and the consolidated result      of operations of the Company for the periods presented. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | By:    | /s/ *Kristian Schiorring*                           |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Name:  | Kristian      Schiorring                                                                                                                                                              |
|   | Title: | Principal      Executive Officer,      Principal      Financial Officer and Director                                                                                                  |
|   | Date:  | May      16, 2011                                                                                                                                                                     |

This  certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

----
# Sheet1

&"Arial,Bold"&10&KFF0000This table was generated on 8/25/20.
#### § 100.13 May the Secretary waive any provision of these regulations?

In an emergency, the Secretary may waive any provision of these regulations.
§ 1149.50 How is witness testimony presented? ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, testimony at the hearing must be given orally by witnesses under oath or affirmation.
( b ) At the discretion of the ALJ, testimony may be admitted in the form of a written statement or deposition. ( 1 ) Any such statement must be provided to all other parties along with the last known address of such witness, in a manner which allows sufficient time for other parties to subpoena the witness for cross-examination at the hearing.
( 2 ) Prior written statements of witnesses proposed to testify at the hearing and deposition transcripts must be exchanged.
( c ) The ALJ must exercise reasonable control over the mode and order of interrogating witnesses and presenting evidence so as to: ( 1 ) Make the interrogation and presentation effective for ascertaining the truth;
( 2 ) Avoid needless consumption of time; and
( 3 ) Protect witnesses from harassment and undue embarrassment.
( d ) The ALJ must permit the parties to conduct such cross examination as may be required for a full and true disclosure of the facts.
( e ) At the discretion of the ALJ, a witness may be cross examined on matters relevant to the proceeding without regard to the scope of his or her direct examination. To the extent permitted by the ALJ, cross-examination on matters outside the scope of direct examination must be conducted in the manner of direct examination. Leading questions may be used only if the witness is a hostile witness, an adverse party, or a witness identified with an adverse party.