alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 100.9 How does the Secretary receive and respond to comments? ( a ) The Secretary follows the procedures in § 100.10 if: ( 1 ) A state office or official is designated to act as a single point of contact between a state process and all Federal agencies, and
( 2 ) That office or official transmits a state process recommendation for a program selected under § 100.6.
( b ) ( 1 ) The single point of contract is not obligated to transmit comments from state, areawide, regional or local officials and entities where there is no state process recommendation.
( 2 ) If a state process recommendation is transmitted by a single point of contact, all comments from state, areawide, regional, and local officials and entities that differ from it must also be transmitted.
( c ) If a state has not established a process, or is unable to submit a state process recommendation, state, areawide, regional and local officials and entities may submit comments either to the applicant or to the Department.
( d ) If a program or activity is not selected for review under a state process, state, areawide, regional and local officials and entities may submit comments either to the applicant or to the Department. In addition, if a state process recommendation for a nonselected program or activity is transmitted to the Department by the single point of contact, the Secretary follows the procedures of § 100.10 of this part.
( e ) The Secretary considers comments which do not constitute a state process recommendation submitted under these regulations and for which the Secretary is not required to apply the procedures of § 100.10 of this part, when such comments are provided by a single point of contact, by the applicant, or directly to the Department by a commenting party.
( f ) If an applicant receives comments under § 100.9(a)(2), (c) or (d) of this part, it must forward such comments to the Department with its application materials.
EX-31.1   CERTIFICATIONS OF CEO PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

I, Ronald J. Chapman, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of ASI Entertainment,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: November 9, 2007

/s/ Ronald J. Chapman

Ronald J. Chapman
Chief Executive Officer
                                   - 1 -
<PAGE>
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 608 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                 S. 608

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to direct the Secretary of the 
   Interior to conduct a study of the Deerfield River for potential 
 addition to the national wild and scenic rivers system, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Deerfield River Wild and Scenic 
River Study Act of 2023''.

SEC. 2. DESIGNATION FOR STUDY; REPORT.

    Section 5 of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 U.S.C. 1276) is 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (a), by adding at the end the following:
            ``(147) Deerfield river, massachusetts and vermont.--The 
        entire river, including--
                    ``(A) the North, South, East, and West Branches of 
                the Deerfield River; and
                    ``(B) the major tributaries of the Deerfield River, 
                including the Green River, North River, South River, 
                Clesson Brook, Chickley River, Cold River, Gulf Brook, 
                Bog Brook, and Dunbar Brook.''; and
            (2) in subsection (b), by adding at the end the following:
            ``(24) Deerfield river, massachusetts and vermont.--Not 
        later than 3 years after the date on which funds are made 
        available to carry out this paragraph, the Secretary of the 
        Interior shall--
                    ``(A) complete the study described in subsection 
                (a)(147); and
                    ``(B) submit to the appropriate committees of 
                Congress a report describing the results of such 
                study.''.

            Passed the Senate December 18 (legislative day, December 
      16), 2024.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
118th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                 S. 608

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to direct the Secretary of the 
   Interior to conduct a study of the Deerfield River for potential 
 addition to the national wild and scenic rivers system, and for other 
                               purposes.
```
* Judge Russell did not participate in consideration of this case. The opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(d). UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-1177
HOMER W. WALKER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus NATIONSBANK; JOE TEMPLE; C. KIM NAZARCHYK; FAYE MCDANIEL, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District Judge. (CA-96-1034-5-BR) Submitted: March 27, 1997 Decided: April 4, 1997 Before RUSSELL, * LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Homer W. Walker, Appellant Pro Se. Benjamin Franklin Davis, Jr., SMITH, HELMS, MULLISS & MOORE, L.L.P., Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).23 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his motion for recusal. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdictionbecause the order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1994), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1994); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     Exhibit 4.1

                                  COMMON STOCK

        NUMBER                                                   SHARES

         2285

                                 NEXLAND, INC.
              INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA


                                                               CUSIP 65332C 10 5


This Certifies that _____________________________________________________ is the

Registered holder of ____________________________________________________ Shares

 FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF THE COMMON STOCK, $0.0001 PAR VALUE OF

                                 NEXLAND, INC.

transferable only on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in
person or by Attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Corporation has caused this Certificate to be
signed by its duly authorized officers and its Corporate Seal to be hereunto
affixed this ____________________ day of _________________ A.D. _______.


               COUNTERSIGNED

                                                     JERSEY TRANSFER & TRUST CO.
                             201 BLOOMFIELD AVE., P.O. BOX 361, VERONA, NJ 07044
                                      BY: ______________________________________
                                                            AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE
                                                                  TRANSFER AGENT



/s/ Martin Dell'Oca                              /s/ Gregory S. Levine
----------------------------                     -------------------------------
       SECRETARY                                            PRESIDENT


                   NEXLAND, INC. CORPORATE SEAL 1995 ARIZONA


FOR VALUE RECEIVED_______________________ hereby sell, assign and transfer unto

_______________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________ Shares
represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and
appoint _____________________________________________ Attorney to transfer the
said Shares on the books of the within named Corporation with full power of
substitution in the premises.

Dated: ___________________________

In presence of ________________________________________________________________


           NOTICE: The signature to this assignment must correspond with the
           name as written upon the face of the Certificate in every particular,
           without alteration or enlargement of any change whatever.
SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NINETY-NINTH CONGRESS

Convened January 3, 1985

FIRST SESSION { Adjourned December 20, 1985

Convened January 21, 1986

SECOND SESSION {

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR

Tu esday, March 4, 1986

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF JO-ANNE L. COE, 

SECRETARY OF THE SENATE

By Gerald A. Hackett, Executive Clerk
1

TREATIES

Calendar

No.

Treaty 

Doc. No.

Subject Reported

By

5 EX. Q, 

96-2

Tax Convention with Denmark Dec 11, 85 Reported 

favorably, by Mr. Evans, 

Committee on Foreign 

Relations, with a proposed 

resolution of advice and 

consent to ratification 

without reservation 

(Printed report—Ex. Rept 

99-5)

6 98-12 Protocol to Amend the 1980 Tax Convention 

with Denmark

Do.

8 98-30 Tax Agreement with the People’s Republic of 

China

Dec 11, 85 Reported 

favorably, by Mr. Evans, 

Committee on Foreign 

Relations, with a proposed 

resolution of advice and 

consent to ratification 

without reservation 

(Printed report—Ex. Rept. 

99-7)

NOMINATIONS

Calendar Message Nominee, Office, And Predecessor Reported

No. No. Bv
2

Calendar

No.

Message

No.

Nominee, Office, And Predecessor Reported

By

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY 

COMMISSION

* 608 401 Terrence M. Scanlon, of the District of 

Columbia, to be Chairman of the Consumer 

Product Safety Commission, vice Nancy 

Harvey Steorts, resigned, to which 

position he was appointed during the 

recess of the Senate from October 12,

1984, until January 3, 1985.

Dec 12, 85 Mr. Danforth, 

Committee on Commerce, 

Science, and 

Transportation, without 

printed report.

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE 

ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES

* 659 742 Lois Burke Shepard, of Maryland, to be 

Director of the Institute of Museum 

Services, vice Susan E. Phillips.

Feb 6, 86 Mr. Hatch, 

Committee on Labor and 

Human Resources, without 

printed report

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

* 660 822 Frances M. Norris, of Virginia, to be 

Assistant Secretary for Legislation and 

Public Affairs, Department of Education, 

vice Anne Graham.

Do.

THE JUDICIARY

672 876-5 Sidney A. Fitzwater, of Texas, to be United 

States District Judge for the Northern 

District of Texas, vice Robert M. Hill, 

elevated.

Feb 27, 86 Mr. Thurmond, 

Committee on the Judiciary, 

without printed report.

675 881-3 Robert J. Bryan, of Washington, to be 

United States District Judge for the 

Western District of Washington, vice a new 

position created by P.L. 98-353, approved 

July 10, 1984.

Do.

*Signifies nominee's commitment to respond to requests to appear and testify before any duly

constituted committee of the Senate.
3

NOMINATIONS PLACED ON THE SECRETARY’ S DESK IN THE SENIOR FOREIGN

SERVICE

Senior Foreign Service nomination of Edwin G. Corr, which was received by the Senate and 

appeared in the Congressional Record of October 28, 1985.
Date of 

report 

1968 

June 6 

Date of 

report 

1968 

June 11 

~:ruat:r nf tl]r luitrb ~tatra NINETIETH CONGRESS 

FIRST 

SECOND 

SESSION {Convened January ro, 1967 

Adjourned December 15, 1967 

SESSION {Convened January rs, r g68 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Pre pa1'ed und e1' the direction of FRANCIS R. V ALEO, Secretary of the Senate 

By GERALD A. HACKETT, Executive Clerk 

Wednesday, June 12, 1968 

TREATY 

Calende.r 

No. Treaty No Subject Action of committee 

8 Ex. A (90th Cong., The International Grains Arrangement of Reported favorably by 

2d sess.) 1967. Mr. Mansfield (for 

Senator Fulbright), 

from the Committee 

on Foreign Relations, 

with a printed report 

(see Ex. Rept. No. 6, 

90th Cong., 2d sess.) 

and minority views 

(sf'e Ex. Rept. No. 6, 

pt. 2, 90th Cong., 2d 

sess.). 

NOMINATIONS 

Calendar Message Name ofnommee 

I 

Olft<'C P!edecesso1 

No. No. 

-

FEDERAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

327 176 A. Everette M aclntyre, of A Federal Twae Commis- Heappoin tmen t. 

Virgin:a. bioner for the term of 7 

years from Sept. 26, 1\l68. 

NOMINATIONS PLACED ON THE SECRETARY'S DESK 

In the Environmental Science Services Administration 

The nominations beginning Hubert W. Keith, Jr., to be captain and ending Jimmy R. Eddlemon to be 

lieutenant (jg.l, which notPinations were received by the Senate and appeared in the Congre~sional Record on 

May 27, 1968. 

In the Coast Guard 

The nominations begmning Joseph J. O'Connell to be lieutenant and ending James M. Johnson to be chief 

1varrant officer (W-21, whtch nominations were received by the Senate and appeared in the Congressional Record 

on May 27, 1968. 

85-022-GS-No 164 U S GOVE RNMENT PRINTI NG OFFICE 1968
2001 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

12-27-2001

Camden Cty Bd v. Beretta USA Corp

Precedential or Non-Precedential:

Docket 01-1051

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2001

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2001 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"Camden Cty Bd v. Beretta USA Corp" (2001). 2001 Decisions. Paper 300.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2001/300
 

 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

 FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT 

 

 No. 01-1051 

 CAMDEN COUNTY BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS, 

 Appellant 

 v. 

 

 *BERETTA, U.S.A. CORP.; PIETRO BERETTA; BROWNING ARMS CO.; 

BRYCO ARMS, INC.; COLT'S MFG CO., INC.; DAVIS INDUSTRIES, INC.; 

GLOCK, INC.; HI-POINT FIREARMS; H&R 1871 INC.; CARL WALTHER GMBH; 

 LORCIN ENGINEERING CO., INC.; NAVEGAR, INC.; PHOENIX ARMS; 

RAVEN ARMS, INC.; SMITH & WESSON CORP.; STURM, RUGER AND CO., INC.; 

 FORJAS TAURUS, S.A.; REPUBLIC ARMS; JOHN DOE MANUFACTURERS 

(1-100); JOHN DOE DEALERS (1-100); JOHN DOE DISTRIBUTORS (1-100) 

 

 (*Amended in accordance with Clerk's Order dated 1/26/01) 

 ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

 DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY 

 

 (Dist. Court No. 99-CV-2518 (JBS)) 

 District Court Judge: Jerome B. Simandle 

 

 Argued September 5, 2001 

 Before: SCIRICA, ALITO, and BARRY, Circuit Judges. 

 __________________ 

 ORDER AMENDING OPINION 

 __________________ 

 Per the direction of the Court, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the 

slip 

opinion in the above case, filed November 16, 2001, be amended as follows: 

 1. On page 3, line 1, substitute the name "ANNE M. PATTERSON" 

for the 

name "ALAN E. KRAUS". 

 2. On page 3, line 20, replace ampersand between "Firearms" and 

"H&R" 
with a comma and add "& Browning Arms Co." after "H&R 1871, Inc.". 

 FOR THE COURT, 

 

 Clerk 

DATED: December 27, 2001
# EUR-Lex - 12007P025 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12007P025

**Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - TITLE III - EQUALITY - Article 25 - The rights of the elderly **

*
Official Journal 303 , 14/12/2007 P. 0007 - 0007 *

Article 25

The rights of the elderly

The Union recognises and respects the rights of the elderly to lead a life of dignity and independence and to participate in social and cultural life.

--------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20463

Statement of Commissioners Bauerly and Weintraub regarding failure of the 

Commission to seek rehearing en banc in EMILY's List v. FEC

We are disappointed that, on October 22, 2009, the Commission failed by a vote 

of 3-3 to approve the General Counsel's recommendation to file a petition for rehearing 

en banc in the case of EMILY's List v. FEC (D.C. Cir. Sept 18, 2009), which struck down 

Commission regulations regarding the allocation of hard and soft money in connection 

with federal elections. The Commission's inability to reach an agreement to seek 

rehearing is troubling because the divided panel's majority opinion reaches constitutional 

conclusions that were not necessary to its holding and were not briefed by either party at 

any stage in the litigation. We also believe the decision will inject confusion into the 

interpretation and application of the Supreme Court's decisions in McConnell v. FEC, 

540 U.S. 93 (2003), FEC v. Massachusetts Citizens for Life, Inc., 479 U.S. 238 (1986), 

and California Medical Ass’n v. FEC, 453 U.S. 182 (1981). As Judge Brown concluded 

in her concurrence, the majority's reasoning "results in tension – perhaps irreconcilable 

tension – with McConnell," and could "have profound results on campaign finance 

regulation." 

Under the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, rehearing by the full Court of 

Appeals is warranted because the majority opinion both conflicts with Supreme Court 

precedent and implicates constitutional questions of exceptional importance. Fed. R. 

App. P. 35(a)(2). Moreover, seeking a rehearing en banc is particularly important in the 

District of Columbia Circuit to provide guidance that reflects the views of the entire 

Circuit, where much of the Commission's litigation is brought, either by choice or as 

mandated by statute. 

Although we do not believe it appropriate to appeal every adverse decision from a 

court, in cases where a divided opinion reaches significant constitutional questions not 

briefed by either party, we believe it is imperative to seek guidance from the full Circuit 

on behalf of the Commission and all who must comply with the FECA. Indeed, we voted 

to seek rehearing en banc because we consider it our duty as officials charged with 

administering the federal campaign finance laws to do so in this matter.
#### Comstock *et al.*v. Warner *et al.,*appellant.

*Partnership—statements made by pm'tner—when binding on firm.*

Plaintiffs being requested, by K. to sell goods to Mm on credit asked defendants, a firm in business in the same city with plaintiffs, concerning the responsibility of K., and were told by one of the defendants that the store carried on by K. was a branch of defendant’s house. Believing this, plaintiffs gave K. credit. *Held,*that such a statement by one of the partners bound defendant’s firm, whether true or false.

*William K Green,*for appellants.

*Sprague*<5 *Gorham,*for respondents.

Mulles, P. J..

Appeal from a judgment entered upon the verdict of a jury, and from an order denying a new trial. The judgment was affirmed, on the ground that the evidence was sufficient to require the court to submit the case to the jury. The head note contains all that is important in the opinion.

*Judgment affirmed.*
#### § 1158.210 Reporting.

No reporting is required with respect to payments of reasonable compensation made to regularly employed officers or employees of a person.