Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 211 / Wednesday, November 1, 2006 / Notices 64291 

Description of respondents: 

Educational institutions, profit and nonprofit organizations, individuals, and 

agencies of local or State governments. 

Annual responses: 300. 

Annual burden hours: 12,000 hours. 

Bureau clearance officer: Fred 

Travnicek, 703–648–7231. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Elizabeth Lemersal, U.S. Geological 

Survey, MS905 National Center, Reston, 

Virginia 20192, (703) 648–6717. 

Dated: October 26, 2006. 

John Haines, 

Acting, Associate Director for Geology, U.S. 

Geological Survey. 

[FR Doc. 06–8996 Filed 10–31–06; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–Y7–M 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

Bureau of Indian Affairs 

Proposed Information Collection Under 

the Paperwork Reduction Act; 

Comment Request 

AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, 

Interior. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed collection. 

SUMMARY: As required by the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995, we are renewing 

the information collection found in the 

general Probate of Indian Decedents’

Estates, Except for Members of the Five 

Civilized Tribes regulations. The 

purpose of this data collection is to 

ensure that Probate regulations are 

administered for the benefit of 

individual Indians and any persons 

having claims against an Indian 

decedent’s estate. 

DATES: Comments on this proposed 

information collection must be received 

by January 2, 2007. 

ADDRESSES: Send comments to William 

Titchywy, Bureau of Indian Affairs, 

Office of Trust Services, Special Projects 

Office, 10th Floor, P.O. Box 10, Phoenix, 

AZ 85001–0010. Comments may also be 

telefaxed to (602) 379–4005. We cannot 

accept E-mail comments at this time. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

William Titchywy, 602–379–4002. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

information provided through collection 

requirements is used by the Department 

of the Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs 

(BIA), to determine heirs and divide any 

funds held by the BIA for an Indian 

decedent and to divide the decedent’s 

trust and restricted real property. The 

information is specifically used by the 

BIA in: 

(a) Instructing an individual in 

starting the probate process; 

(b) Preparing a probate package for 

review; 

(c) Filing claims; 

(d) Disbursing assets; and 

(e) Filing appeals for adverse 

decisions. 

Request for Comments 

The BIA requests your comments on 

this collection concerning: 

(a) The necessity of this information 

collection for the proper performance of 

the functions of the agency, including 

whether the information will have 

practical utility; 

(b) The accuracy of the agency’s 

estimate of the burden (hours and cost) 

of the collection of information, 

including the validity of the 

methodology and assumptions used; 

(c) Ways we could enhance the 

quality, utility and clarity of the 

information to be collected; and 

(d) Ways we could minimize the 

burden of the collection of the 

information on the respondents, such as 

facilitating use of automation for 

collection techniques or other forms of 

information technology. 

Please note that an agency may not 

sponsor or request and an individual 

need not respond to, a collection of 

information unless it has a valid OMB 

Control Number. 

It is our policy to make all comments 

available to the public for review at the 

location listed in the ADDRESSES section, 

10th Floor, during the hours of 8:30 a.m. 

to 5 p.m. MST, Monday through Friday 

except for legal holidays. If you wish to 

have your name and/or address 

withheld, you must state this 

prominently at the beginning of your 

comments. We will honor your request 

according to the requirements of the 

law. All comments from organizations 

or representatives will be available for 

review. We may withhold comments 

from review for other reasons. 

OMB Control Number: 1076–0156. 

Type of Review: Renewal. 

Title: Probate of Indian Estates, Except 

for Members of the Five Civilized 

Tribes, 25 CFR 15. 

Brief Description of collection: 

Information is collected through the 

probate process when the BIA learns of 

a decedent’s death from a family 

member, neighbor, friend or any other 

person or agency. The information, 

together with specific documents, is 

used to determine if the decedent 

owned a trust estate, to prepare a 

probate package and to distribute estate 

assets. Respondents must inform the 

BIA if any of the required information 

or documents are not available. 

Respondents: Possible respondents 

include: Individual tribal members, 

individual non-Indians, individual 

tribal member-owned businesses, nonIndian owned businesses, tribal 

governments, and land owners who are 

seeking a benefit. 

Number of Respondents: 37,477 

annually. 

Annual hours: 179,868. 

Estimated Time per Response: 5 

hours. 

Frequency of Response: As required. 

Dated: October 27, 2006. 

Michael D. Olsen, 

Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary—Indian 

Affairs. 

[FR Doc. E6–18399 Filed 10–31–06; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–W7–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

National Park Service 

Notice of Availability of a Record of 

Decision for the Fort King Special 

Resource Study 

SUMMARY: Congress, in the Interior 

Appropriations Act of 2000, authorized 

the Fort King Special Resource Study 

and Final Environmental Impact 

Statement (‘‘Study’’). The legislation 

directed the National Park Service (NPS) 

to determine whether Fort King is 

nationally significant and, if so, whether 

it is suitable and feasible as a new unit 

of the National Park System. 

Acknowledging the site’s National 

Historic Landmark (NHL) status, the 

Study determined that Fort King is 

nationally significant. In addition, the 

Study determined that Fort King is 

suitable and feasible for inclusion in the 

National Park System because its 

interpretive themes are 

underrepresented in the current system 

and the property is of sufficient size and 

shape to protect resources and 

accommodate public use. The study 

does not, however, propose an active 

NPS management role at the site. 

Rather, existing programs such as Save 

America’s Treasures and Preserve 

America are used to exemplify the types 

of NPS assistance available to future 

non-Federal managers of the Fort King 

property. 

The Final Study was distributed for 

public review in August 2006. The NPS 

has prepared a Record of Decision 

(ROD) on the Study to document the 

decision made, the background of the 

project, other alternatives considered, 

the basis for the decision, the 

environmentally preferable alternative, 

and the public involvement in the 

decision-making process. 

The 1998 Omnibus Parks 

Management Act (Pub. L. 105–391 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
64292 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 211 / Wednesday, November 1, 2006 / Notices 

1 1 No response to this request for information is 

required if a currently valid Office of Management 

and Budget (OMB) number is not displayed; the 

OMB number is 3117–0016/USITC No. 07–5–162, 

expiration date June 30, 2008. Public reporting 

burden for the request is estimated to average 10 

hours per response. Please send comments 

regarding the accuracy of this burden estimate to 

the Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 

20436. 

§ 303) mandates that each Special 

Resources Study (SRS) identify the 

alternative or combination of 

alternatives which would, in the 

professional judgment of the Director of 

the NPS, be ‘‘most effective and efficient 

in protecting significant resources and 

providing for public enjoyment.’’ The 

Study identifies Alternative B in the 

Study as the environmentally preferred 

alternative and most effective and 

efficient alternative because it preserves 

more of the site’s archeological 

resources in an undisturbed condition 

and minimizes capital expenditures and 

long-term operating costs. 

Under Alternative B, the historic 

significance of Fort King would be 

communicated to visitors primarily 

through self-guided interpretive trails, 

wayside exhibits, and brochures. The 

park would not have a permanent onsite staff. Guided tours and live 

interpretation programs for school 

groups and special events would be 

provided by volunteers on a case by 

case basis. The site’s existing wooded 

landscape would remain predominantly 

unchanged. Pedestrian trails would be 

cleared by vegetation and lightly graded. 

Trees and other woody vegetation 

immediately surrounding the fort 

location would be thinned or removed 

for interpretive purposes. 

The Federal government would not 

assume ownership of land, impose 

zoning or land use controls, or take 

responsibility for permanent funding. 

Likewise, there would be no direct NPS 

ownership or management of resources. 

As with other National Historic 

Landmarks, the NPS could provide 

technical assistance for general 

planning, resource management, and 

interpretation. However, overall 

management of the Fort King site would 

be administered by one or more local 

entities. 

The Study also presented in detail a 

No Action and two Action Alternatives 

that describe different ways of 

commemorating, interpreting, and 

preserving resources associated with 

Fort King. All alternatives are described 

in detail in the Study. 

Alternative B provides a broad range 

of public benefits such as improved 

public access, long-term preservation of 

archeological resources, and increased 

visitor awareness of the site’s national 

significance while minimizing capital 

expenditures and long-term operating 

costs. 

DATES: On September 14, 2006, the 

Regional Director, Southeast Region, 

NPS signed the ROD for the SRS and 

Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) 

for Fort King. 

ADDRESSES: Tim Bemisderfer, Planning 

and Compliance Division, Southeast 

Region, National Park Service, 100 

Alabama Street SW., 1924 Building, 

Atlanta, Georgia 30303. An electronic 

copy of the Final EIS and ROD are 

available on the internet at http:// 

parkplanning.nps.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tim 

Bemisderfer, 404–562–3124, extension 

693. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A copy of 

the ROD can be obtained via the Internet 

by visiting the NPS Planning 

Environmental and Public Comment 

System Web site at http:// 

parkplanning.nps.gov or by calling 404–

562–3124, extension 693. 

The responsible official for the FEIS is 

Patricia A. Hooks, Regional Director, 

Southeast Region, National Park 

Service, 100 Alabama Street SW., 1924 

Building, Atlanta, Georgia 30303. 

Dated: September 29, 2006. 

Patricia A. Hooks, 

Regional Director, Southeast Region. 

[FR Doc. 06–9002 Filed 10–31–06; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–70–M 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation Nos. 701–TA–402 and 731–

TA–892 and 893 (Review)] 

Honey From Argentina and China 

AGENCY: United States International 

Trade Commission. 

ACTION: Institution of five-year reviews 

concerning the countervailing duty 

order on honey from Argentina and the 

antidumping duty orders on honey from 

Argentina and China. 

SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives 

notice that it has instituted reviews 

pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff 

Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)) (the Act) 

to determine whether revocation of the 

countervailing duty order on honey 

from Argentina and the antidumping 

duty orders on honey from Argentina 

and China would be likely to lead to 

continuation or recurrence of material 

injury. Pursuant to section 751(c)(2) of 

the Act, interested parties are requested 

to respond to this notice by submitting 

the information specified below to the 

Commission; 1 to be assured of 

consideration, the deadline for 

responses is December 21, 2006. 

Comments on the adequacy of responses 

may be filed with the Commission by 

January 16, 2007. For further 

information concerning the conduct of 

these reviews and rules of general 

application, consult the Commission’s 

Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 

201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 

201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and 

F (19 CFR part 207). 

EFFECTIVE DATE: November 1, 2006. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Mary Messer (202–205–3193), Office of 

Investigations, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW., 

Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain 

information on this matter by contacting 

the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–

205–1810. Persons with mobility 

impairments who will need special 

assistance in gaining access to the 

Commission should contact the Office 

of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. 

General information concerning the 

Commission may also be obtained by 

accessing its internet server (http:// 

www.usitc.gov). The public record for 

these reviews may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at http://edis.usitc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background. On December 10, 2001, the 

Department of Commerce issued a 

countervailing duty order on imports of 

honey from Argentina (66 FR 63673) 

and antidumping duty orders on 

imports of honey from Argentina and 

China (66 FR 63672, 63670). The 

Commission is conducting reviews to 

determine whether revocation of the 

orders would be likely to lead to 

continuation or recurrence of material 

injury to the domestic industry within 

a reasonably foreseeable time. It will 

assess the adequacy of interested party 

responses to this notice of institution to 

determine whether to conduct full 

reviews or expedited reviews. The 

Commission’s determinations in any 

expedited reviews will be based on the 

facts available, which may include 

information provided in response to this 

notice. 

Definitions. The following definitions 

apply to these reviews: 

(1) Subject Merchandise is the class or 

kind of merchandise that is within the 

scope of the five-year reviews, as 

defined by the Department of 

Commerce. 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES