Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 211 / Wednesday, November 1, 2006 / Notices 64245 

1On April 6, 2006, the Department published a 

notice initiating new shipper reviews of Kunj, 

Micro, Pradeep, and Rollwell. See Stainless Steel 

Flanges from India: Notice of Initiation of 

Antidumping Duty New Shipper Reviews, 71 FR 

17439 (April 6, 2006). On September 29, 2006, we 

rescinded the new shipper reviews with respect to 

Micro, Pradeep, and Rollwell. See Certain Forged 

Stainless Steel Flanges from India: Notice of Partial 

Rescission of New Shipper Reviews, 71 FR 57468 

(September 29, 2006). 

antidumping duty administrative 

review. See Notice of Preliminary 

Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review, Notice of Intent 

to Revoke in Part: Individually Quick 

Frozen Red Raspberries from Chile, 71 

FR 45000 (August 8, 2006). 

Extension of Time Limits for Final 

Results 

The Department requires additional 

time to verify the cost information 

submitted by a respondent in this 

administrative review. Moreover, the 

Department requires additional time to 

analyze complex cost issues relating to 

direct material purchases. Thus, it is not 

practicable to complete this review 

within the original time limit (i.e., 

December 6, 2006). Therefore, the 

Department is extending the time limit 

for completion of the final results of this 

administrative review until no later than 

February 4, 2007, which is 180 days 

from the date of publication of the 

preliminary results. However, February 

4 falls on Sunday, and it is the 

Department’s long–standing practice to 

issue a determination the next business 

day when the statutory deadline falls on 

a weekend, federal holiday, or any other 

day when the Department is closed. See 

Notice of Clarification: Application of 

‘‘Next Business Day’’ Rule for 

Administrative Determination Deadlines 

Pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930, As 

Amended, 70 FR 24533 (May 10, 2005). 

Accordingly, the deadline for 

completion of the final results is 

February 5, 2007. 

We are issuing and publishing this 

notice in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. 

Dated: October 25, 2006. 

Stephen J. Claeys, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. E6–18406 Filed 10–31–06; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–533–809] 

Notice of Extension of Time Limit for 

the Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review: Stainless Steel Flanges From 

India 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

DATES: Effective Dates: 

November 1, 2006. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Fred 

Baker or Robert James, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office 7, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–2924 or (202) 482–

0649, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On February 9, 1994, the Department 

published the antidumping duty order 

on stainless steel flanges from India. See 

Amended Final Determination and 

Antidumping Duty Order; Certain 

Forged Stainless Steel Flanges from 

India, 59 FR 5994 (February 9, 1994). 

On February 28, 2006, we received 

requests for an administrative review for 

the period February 1, 2005, through 

January 31, 2006, from Echjay Forgings 

Pvt. Ltd. (Echjay) and Shree Ganesh 

Forgings, Ltd. (Shree Ganesh). We also 

received requests for a new shipper 

review and, failing that, an 

administrative review, from Kunj 

Forgings Pvt. Ltd. (Kunj), Micro Forge 

(India) Ltd. (Micro), Pradeep Metals 

Limited (Pradeep), and Rollwell Forge, 

Ltd. (Rollwell). On April 5, 2006, we 

initiated administrative reviews of the 

six companies. See Initiation of 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Reviews and Deferral of 

Administrative Reviews, 71 FR 17077 

(April 5, 2006).1 The preliminary results 

of the administrative review are 

currently due no later than October 31, 

2006. 

Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary 

Results 

The Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 

(the Act), at section 351(a)(3)(A), 

provides that the Department will issue 

the preliminary results of an 

administrative review of an 

antidumping duty order within 245 

days after the last day of the anniversary 

month of the date of publication of the 

order. The Act provides further that if 

the Department determines that it is not 

practicable to complete the review 

within this time period, the Department 

may extend the 245-day period to 365 

days. 

The Department has determined that 

it is not practicable to complete the 

preliminary results by the current 245- 

day deadline of October 31, 2006. 

Rollwell has reported several new 

model types of flanges that the 

Department has not analyzed in 

previous segments of this proceeding. 

We require additional time to make a 

thorough analysis of these model types 

and to determine appropriate model 

match weighting criteria. Therefore, in 

accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of 

the Act, and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(2), the 

Department is extending the time limit 

for the preliminary results by 120 days 

to February 28, 2007. 

This notice is issued and published in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(3)(A) 

and 777(i)(1) of the Act. 

Dated: October 25, 2006. 

Stephen J. Claeys, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. E6–18407 Filed 10–31–06; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

National Oceanic and Atmospheric 

Administration 

Marine Protected Areas Federal 

Advisory Committee 

AGENCY: National Ocean Service, 

NOAA, Department of Commerce. 

ACTION: Extension of deadline for 

nominations for the Marine Protected 

Areas Federal Advisory Committee. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

published a notice in the Federal 

Register on September 26, 2006 (71 FR 

45107) seeking nominations for 

membership on the Marine Protected 

Areas Federal Advisory Committee 

(Committee). The deadline for 

nominations by qualified persons to the 

Committee is hereby extended. 

DATES: The extended deadline for 

nominations to the Committee is 

November 30, 2006. 

ADDRESSES: Nominations should be sent 

to Lauren Wenzel, National Oceanic and 

Atmospheric Administration, National 

marine Protected Areas Center, 1305 

East West Highway, Station #12227, 

Silver Spring, MD 20910. E-mail: 

Lauren.wenzel@noaa.gov. E-mail 

nominations are acceptable. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Refer to the Federal Register notice of 

September 26, 2006, or contact Lauren 

Wenzel, (301) 713–3100 x136, 

Lauren.wenzel@noaa.gov. 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
64246 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 211 / Wednesday, November 1, 2006 / Notices 

Dated: October 26, 2006. 

Elizabeth R. Scheffler, 

Associate Assistant Administrator for 

Management, National Ocean Service. 

[FR Doc. 06–9013 Filed 10–31–06; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–08–M 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

GENERAL SERVICES 

ADMINISTRATION 

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND 

SPACE ADMINISTRATION 

[OMB Control No. 9000–0133] 

Federal Acquisition Regulation; 

Information 

Collection;DefenseProduction Act 

Amendments 

AGENCIES: Department of Defense (DOD), 

General ServicesAdministration (GSA), 

and National Aeronautics and Space 

Administration (NASA). 

ACTION: Notice of request for comments 

regarding anextension to an existing 

OMB clearance (9000–0133). 

SUMMARY: Under the provisions of the 

Paperwork ReductionAct of 1995 (44 

U.S.C. Chapter 35), the Federal 

Acquisition Regulation(FAR) Secretariat 

will be submitting to the Office of 

Management and Budget(OMB) a 

request to review and approve an 

extension of a currently 

approvedinformation collection 

requirement concerning Defense 

Production ActAmendments. A request 

for public comments was published in 

the Federal Register at 71 FR 38866, 

July 10, 2006. No commentswere 

received. The clearancecurrently expires 

on October 31, 2006. 

Public comments are particularly 

invited on: Whether this collection 

ofinformation is necessary for the 

proper performance of functions of 

theFAR, and whether it will have 

practical utility; whether our estimate 

ofthe public burden of this collection of 

information is accurate, and basedon 

valid assumptions and methodology; 

ways to enhance the quality, utility,and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and ways in which we 

canminimize the burden of the 

collection of information on those who 

are torespond, through the use of 

appropriate technological collection 

techniquesor other forms of information 

technology. 

DATES: Comments may be submitted on 

or before December 1, 2006. 

ADDRESSES: Submit comments regarding 

this burdenestimate or any other aspect 

of the collection of information, 

includingsuggestions for reducing this 

burden to the General 

ServicesAdministration, Regulatory 

Secretariat (VIR), 1800 F Street, NW, 

Room 4035,Washington, DC 20405. FOR 

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Ms. JerittaParnell, Contract Policy 

Division, GSA, (202)501–4082. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

A. Purpose 

Title III of the Defense Production Act 

(DPA) of 1950 authorizes variousforms 

of Government assistance to encourage 

expansion of productioncapacity and 

supply of industrial resources essential 

to national defense.The DPA 

Amendments of 1992 provide for the 

testing, qualification, and useof 

industrial resources manufactured or 

developed with assistance 

providedunder Title III of the DPA. 

FAR 34.1 and 52.234–1 require 

contractors, upon the direction ofthe 

contracting officer, to test Title III 

industrial resources forqualification, 

and provide the test results to the 

Defense Production ActOffice. The FAR 

coverage also expresses Government 

policy to pay for suchtesting and 

provides definitions, procedures, and a 

contract clause toimplement the policy. 

This information is used by the Defense 

ProductionAct Office, Title III Program, 

to determine whether the Title 

IIIindustrial resource has been provided 

an impartial opportunity toqualify. 

B. Annual Reporting Burden 

Respondents: 6. 

Responses Per Respondent: 3. 

Total Annual Responses: 18. 

Hours Per Response: 100. 

Total Burden Hours: 1,800. 

Obtaining Copies of Proposals: 

Requesters may obtain acopy of the 

information collection documents from 

the General ServicesAdministration, 

Regulatory Secretariat (VIR), Room 

4035, Washington, DC20405, telephone 

(202) 501–4755. Please cite OMB 

Control Number9000–0133, Defense 

Production Act Amendments, in 

allcorrespondence. 

Ralph De Stefano, 

Director, Contract Policy Division 

[FR Doc. 06–8993 Filed 10–31–06; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6820–EP–S 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

GENERAL SERVICES 

ADMINISTRATION 

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND 

SPACE ADMINISTRATION 

[OMB Control No. 9000–0096] 

Federal Acquisition Regulation; 

Submission for OMB Review; Patents 

AGENCIES: Department of Defense (DOD), 

General ServicesAdministration (GSA), 

and National Aeronautics and Space 

Administration (NASA). 

ACTION: Notice of request for comments 

regarding anextension to an existing 

OMB clearance (9000–0096). 

SUMMARY: Under the provisions of the 

Paperwork ReductionAct of 1995 (44 

U.S.C. Chapter 35), the Federal 

Acquisition Regulation(FAR) Secretariat 

has submitted to the Office of 

Management and Budget(OMB) a 

request to review and approve an 

extension of a currently 

approvedinformation collection 

requirement concerning patents. A 

request forpublic comments was 

published in the Federal Register at 

71FR 40998, on July 19, 2006. No public 

comments were received. 

Public comments are particularly 

invited on: Whether this collection 

ofinformation is necessary for the 

proper performance of functions of 

theFAR, and whether it will have 

practical utility; whether our estimate 

ofthe public burden of this collection of 

information is accurate, and basedon 

valid assumptions and methodology; 

ways to enhance the quality, utility,and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and ways in which we 

canminimize the burden of the 

collection of information on those who 

are torespond, through the use of 

appropriate technological collection 

techniquesor other forms of information 

technology. 

DATES: Submit comments on or before 

December 1, 2006. 

ADDRESSES: Submit comments including 

suggestions forreducing this burden to: 

FAR Desk Officer, OMB, Room 10102, 

NEOB,Washington, DC 20503, and a 

copy to the General Services 

Administration,FAR Secretariat (VIR), 

Room 4035 1800 F Street, NW., 

Washington, DC 20405. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Ernest Woodson,Contract Policy 

Division, GSA (202) 501–3775. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES