U

.S

.Deportment of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration January 20, 2015

Stacey and Joseph Spanics Parents ofStephen Spanics 127 Cassin Cres Winnipeg, MB R3X 1 R Dear Mrs. and Mr. Spanics: Exemption No. 11147 800 Independence Ave

. S W Wash ington
. DC 20591

Regulatory Docket No. FAA-20 14-1005

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. 

### It transmits our decision , explains its basis, and lists the conditions and limitations ofthe exemption, including the date it ends. 

### The Basis for Our Decision By letter received December 2, 2014, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalfofStephen Spanics for an exemption rrom 

### § 121.311 (b) ofTitle 14, Code of Federal Regulations ( 14 CFR). That exemption, ifgranted, would allow Stephen to exceed the specified weight and/or height limit for an FAA-approved child r estraint system (CAReS, manufactured by AmSafe Corporation) during use ofthat child restraint system (CRS) aboard a United States (U.S.) aircraft. The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary ofthe petition in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Stephen. The FAA has issued grants ofexemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to those presented in your petition. In Grant ofExemption No. 9834 (copy enclosed), the FAA found that numerous people with physical challenges had previously completed flights using restraint systems that addressed unique physical needs regarding safety, support, and security in the same manner ofoperations as described in this petition. The FAA further found that the petition would not set any new precedents regarding the use ofrestraint systems by persons with disabilities.

AFS-15-20 1--E

### 2 Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that- • they are similar in all material respects to reliefpreviously requested in the enclosed Grant ofExemption No. 9834; • the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed Grant ofExemption No. 9834 also apply to the situation you present; and • a grant ofexemption is in the public interest. 

### Our Decision Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 

### §§ 106(t), 40113 and 44701 , which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me , I hereby grant Stephen Spanics an exemption from 

### § 121.311 (b). In addition , any air carrier or commercial operator operating under part 121 while Stephen is aboard its aircraft is granted an exemption from 14 CFR 

### § 121.311 (b) to the extent necessary to allow him to use an FAA-approved CRS aboard a U.S. aircraft. All operations under this exemption must be conducted with at least one ofStephen's parents or a caregiver accompanying him. Stephen Spanics may only occupy a passenger seat with no passenger seated behind him. In addition , Stephen' s parent or caregiver must carry a copy of this exemption and advise the air carrier about the contents ofthe exemption at least 48 hours before the date ofeach flight. This exemption terminates on January 31 , 2020, unless sooner superseded or rescinded. Sincerely,

# ~~wfJtJ John Barbagallo Acting Deputy Director, Flight Standards Servi ce

Enclosure