alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
steam

_ record - Re: Extension Request - Golden Valle y Electric Association

Greetings,

This e-mail is a confirmation that your exte nsion request for the steam electric effluent guidelines questionnaire was received. Extension requests will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. Please be aware that submittal of an ex tension request to EPA does not alter the due date of your questionnaire unless and until EPA agre es to the extension and establishes a new date.

Sincerely,

-----"Kris E. DuBois" <KEDuBois@gvea.com> wrote: -----

To: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA From: "Kris E. DuBois" <KEDuBois@gvea.com> Date: 07/14/2010 04:12PM From: <Alicea.Jezebele @ epamail.epa. g ov> To: "Kris E. DuBois" <KEDuBois@gvea.com> Date: 7/15/2010 6:44 AM Sub j ect: Re: Extension Request - Golden Valley Electric Associatio n Attachments: GVEA Ext Req EPA WW ICR 071410.pdf Pa g e 1 of 2

8/24/2011 file://C:\Documents and Settin g s\TMedle y \Local Settin g s\Tem p \XP g r p wise\4C3EAE47D

...Subject: Extension Request - Gold en Valley Electric Association

Good afternoon: GVEA requests an ex tension for completion of the Steam Electric Power Generating Industry ICR. Please see the attached document. A hard co py is forthcoming via certified mail. Thank you for considering our request and please call me if you hav e any questions. – Kris DuBois/GVEA Environmental Officer

Kristen DuBois

Environmental Officer

Golden Valley Elec tric Association

758 Illinois Street

Fairbanks, AK 99707-1249

(907) 451-5627 office

(907) 458-6369 fax

(907) 388-6300 cell Pa g e 2 of 2

8/24/2011 file://C:\Documents and Settin g s\TMedle y \Local Settin g s\Tem p \XP g r p wise\4C3EAE47D

...
#### § 155.500 Definitions.

In addition to those definitions in §§ 155.20 and 155.300, for purposes of this subpart and § 155.740 of subpart H, the following terms have the following meanings:

*Appeal record* means the appeal decision, all papers and requests filed in the proceeding, and, if a hearing was held, the transcript or recording of hearing testimony or an official report containing the substance of what happened at the hearing, and any exhibits introduced at the hearing.

*Appeal request* means a clear expression, either orally or in writing, by an applicant, enrollee, employer, or small business employer or employee to have any eligibility determination or redetermination contained in a notice issued in accordance with § 155.310(g), § 155.330(e)(1)(ii), § 155.335(h)(1)(ii), § 155.610(i), § 155.715(e) or (f), or § 155.716(e) reviewed by an appeals entity.

*Appeals entity* means a body designated to hear appeals of eligibility determinations or redeterminations contained in notices issued in accordance with § 155.310(g), § 155.330(e)(1)(ii), § 155.335(h)(1)(ii), § 155.610(i), § 155.715(e) and (f), or § 155.716(e).

*Appellant* means the applicant or enrollee, the employer, or the small business employer or employee who is requesting an appeal.

*De novo review* means a review of an appeal without deference to prior decisions in the case.

*Evidentiary hearing* means a hearing conducted where evidence may be presented.

*Vacate* means to set aside a previous action.

[78 FR 54136, Aug. 30, 2013, as amended at 83 FR 17063, Apr. 17, 2018]
#### Arthur F. Simonson, Respondent, *v.*Louis P. Mendham et al., Appellants.

*Simonson*v. *Mendham,*115 App. Div. 882, affirmed.

(Submitted October 30, 1907;

decided November 19, 1907.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered October 3, 1906, affirming a judgment in favor, of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover for a loss alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff’s assignor through the failure of the defendants, a firm of stock brokers, to execute certain orders and instructions relative to the sale of stocks.

*516
      *Arthur Ofner*and *Frank Acer*for appellants.

*Albert A. Wray*and *Stephen Callaghan*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Yann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ.
The Attorney General of Texas 

August 1, 1980 

MARK WHITE 

Attorney General 

Honorable Gibson D. (Gib) Lewis 

Chairman 

Committee on Intergovernmental 

Affairs 

House of Representatives 

Austin, Texas 

Opinion No. MW-2 14 

Re: Authority of the Board of 

Regents of North Texas State 

University to designate the chief 

executive officer of the University 

as chancellor 

Dear Representative Lewis: 

You have requested our opinion regarding the authority of the Board of 

Regents of North Texas State University to designate the chief executive 

officer of the university as chancellor. 

Section 105.74 of the Education Code provides: 

The chief executive officer of the university shall 

serve as chief executive officer of the college of 

osteopathic medicine. 

The title to be conferred on the chief executive officer is not fixed by 

statute. 

The Board of Regents of North Texas State University has: 

[w] ith respect to the management and control of 

the university . . . the same powers and duties that 

are conferred on the Board of Regents, State Senior 

Colleges, with respect to institutions in that system. 

Education Code S105.41. The Board of Regents, State Senior Colleges, “is 

responsible for the general control and management of the universities in 

the system,” and, pursuant to such authority, it may: 

employ and discharge presidents or principals, 

teachers, treasurers, and other employees. 

Education Code 595.21. (Emphasis added). 

P. 684 
Honorable Gibson D. (Gib) Lewis - Page Two (MW-214) 

In Attorney General Opinion MW-64 (1979), we said that the Coordinating Board 

and a board of regents were prohibited from changing the statutorily established name 

of an institution. In the present instance, however, the chief executive officer has no 

statutorily established title. As a result, we believe that the Board of Regents, acting 

under its general authority to employ officials, may designate its chief executive 

officer as chancellor, so long as that individual is the chief executive officer of both 

North Texas State University and the College of Osteopathic Medicine. 

SUMMARY 

The Board of Regents of North Texas State University may 

validly designate the chief executive officer of the university as 

chancellor. 

Attorney General of Texas 

JOHN W. FAINTER, JR. 

First Assistant Attorney General 

Prepared by Rick Gilpin 

Assistant Attorney General 

APPROVED: 

OPINION COMMITTEE 

C. Robert Heath, Chairman 

Jon Bible 

Susan Garrison 

Rick Gilpin 

Ann Kraatz 

P. 685
# EUR-Lex - 12006E152 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12006E152

**Treaty establishing the European Community (consolidated version) - Part Three - Community policies - TITLE XIII - Public health - Article 152 **

*
Official Journal C 321 E , 29/12/2006 P. 0114 - 0115 Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0100 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0246 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0048 - Consolidated version (EEC Treaty - no official publication available) *

Article 152

1. A high level of human health protection shall be ensured in the definition and implementation of all Community policies and activities.

Community action, which shall complement national policies, shall be directed towards improving public health, preventing human illness and diseases, and obviating sources of danger to human health. Such action shall cover the fight against the major health scourges, by promoting research into their causes, their transmission and their prevention, as well as health information and education.

The Community shall complement the Member States' action in reducing drugs-related health damage, including information and prevention.

2. The Community shall encourage cooperation between the Member States in the areas referred to in this Article and, if necessary, lend support to their action.

Member States shall, in liaison with the Commission, coordinate among themselves their policies and programmes in the areas referred to in paragraph 1. The Commission may, in close contact with the Member States, take any useful initiative to promote such coordination.

3. The Community and the Member States shall foster cooperation with third countries and the competent international organisations in the sphere of public health.

4. The Council, acting in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 251 and after consulting the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, shall contribute to the achievement of the objectives referred to in this Article through adopting:

(a) measures setting high standards of quality and safety of organs and substances of human origin, blood and blood derivatives; these measures shall not prevent any Member State from maintaining or introducing more stringent protective measures;

(b) by way of derogation from Article 37, measures in the veterinary and phytosanitary fields which have as their direct objective the protection of public health;

(c) incentive measures designed to protect and improve human health, excluding any harmonisation of the laws and regulations of the Member States.

The Council, acting by a qualified majority on a proposal from the Commission, may also adopt recommendations for the purposes set out in this Article.

5. Community action in the field of public health shall fully respect the responsibilities of the Member States for the organisation and delivery of health services and medical care. In particular, measures referred to in paragraph 4(a) shall not affect national provisions on the donation or medical use of organs and blood.

--------------------------------------------------
1 The Honorable Joseph F. Bataillon, Chie f Judge, United States District Court for the District of Nebraska. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 07-1769

___________ United States, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Nebraska. Keith Brian Carter, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: September 5, 2007 Filed: September 11, 2007

___________ Before BYE, RILEY, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Keith Brian Carter appeals the sentence the district court 1 imposed after revoking his supervised release. He also moves to supplement the record on appeal. We grant his motion and affirm the sentence. In 1993 Carter was sentenced to 120 months in prison; his 8-year term of supervised release commenced in May 1999. At a March 2007 revocation hearing, Carter admitted violating conditions of his rel ease. Subject to anadvisory Guidelines-2- range of 6-12 months in prison, Carter reque sted a sentence within that range with no further supervision. The court imposed a sentence of 12 months and 1 day in prison, followed by 5 years of supervised release.
We hold that the revocation sent ence is not unreasonable. See United States v. Tyson , 413 F.3d 824, 825 (8th Cir. 2005) (per curiam) (standard of review). The district court properly considered relevant factors, including Carter’s history and characteristics, the need for deterrence, and the advisory Guidelines range and other sentencing options. See 18 U.S.C. §§ 3553(a), 3583(c); United States v. Nelson , 453 F.3d 1004, 1006 (8th Cir. 2006) (in fashioning revocation sentence, district court is to consider advisory sent encing range and policy statem ents found in Chapter 7 of Guidelines, as well as certain additional § 3553(a) factors); United States v. Larison , 432 F.3d 921, 923 (8th Cir. 2006) (distric t court need not list every § 3553(a) consideration when sentencing defendant upon revocation of supervised release). Accordingly, we affirm.

______________________________
Case 1:16-cv-02201-EGS Document 51 Filed 02/10/20 Page 1 of 1
SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

ONE HUNDRED FIRST CONGRESS 

Convened January 3, 1989 

FIRST SESSION { Adjourned November 22, 1989 

Convened January 23, 1990 

SECOND SESSION { 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Friday, October 19, 1990 

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF WALTER J.STEWART, 

SECRETARY OF THE SENATE 

By Gerald A. Hackett, Executive Clerk 
1 

TREATIES 

Calendar Treaty Subject Reported No. Doc. No. Bv 

11 EX. B., Two Related Protocols to the Convention for Jun 28 90 Reported 95-1 the Unification of Certain Rules Relating favorably by Mr. Pell, 

to International Carriage by Air, as Committee on Foreign Am.ended (Montreal Aviation Protocols Nos. Relations, with a 

3 and 4). resolution of advice and 

consent to ratification 

with certain conditions 

(Printed report-Ex. Rept 

101-21 together with 

minority views). 

12 100-20 Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Jul 19, 90 Reported 

Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or favorably by Mr. Pell, 

Punishment. Committee on Foreign 

Relations, with a 

resolution of advice and 

consent to ratification 

with reservations, 

understandings and 

declarations. 

Aug 30, 90 Printed report 

filed (Ex. Rept. 101-30) 

together with additional 

views. 

24 99-14 Investment Treaty with Panama. Oct 9, 90 Reported 

favorably by Mr. Pell, 

Committee on Foreign 

Relations, with a 

resolution of advice and 

consent to ratification 

without amendment (Printed 

report--Ex. Rept 101-34). 

25 101-18 Treaty With Poland Concerning Business and - do -

Economic Relations. 
Calendar 

No. 

• 944 

• 970 

• 1062 

• 1063 

Message 

No. 

1370 

1435-1 

1322-2 

1413-1 

2 

NOMINATIONS 

Nominee, Office, And Predecessor 

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 

Bert W. Corneby, of New York, to be 

Superintendent of the Mint of the United 

States at West Point, New York, vice 

Clifford M. Barber, resigned. 

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION 

W. Glenn Campbell, of California, to be a 

Member of the National Science Board, 

National Science Foundation for the 

remainder of the term expiring May 10, 

1994, vice D. Allan Bromley, resigned. 

[NEW REPORTS] 

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Keith D. Bjerke, of North Dakota, to be a 

Member of the Board of Directors of the 

Commodity Credit Corporation, vice Milton 

J. Hertz, resigned. 

FARM CREDIT ADMINISTRATION 

Billy Ross Brown, of Mississippi, to be a 

Member of the Farm Credit Administration 

Board, Farm Credit Administration, for the 

term expiring October 13, 1994, vice Jim 

R. Billington. resilYTied. 

Reported 

Bv 

Aug 3, 90 Mr. Riegle, 

Committee on Banking, 

Housing, and Urban Affairs, 

without printed report. 

Sep 12, 90 Mr. Kennedy, 

Committee on Labor and 

Human Resources, without 

prin tecl report. 

Oct 18, 90 Mr. Leahy, 

Committee on Agriculture, 

Nutrition, and Forestry, 

without printed report. 

Do. 

*Signifies nominee's commitment to respond to requests to appear and testify before any duly 

constituted committee of the Senate.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 758 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 758

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To amend the Tariff Act of 1930 to protect personally identifiable 
                  information, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Moving Americans Privacy Protection 
Act''.

SEC. 2. PROTECTION OF PERSONALLY IDENTIFIABLE INFORMATION.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (2) of section 431(c) of the Tariff Act 
of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1431(c)) is amended to read as follows:
    ``(2)(A) The information listed in paragraph (1) shall not be 
available for public disclosure if--
            ``(i) the Secretary of the Treasury makes an affirmative 
        finding on a shipment-by-shipment basis that disclosure is 
        likely to pose a threat of personal injury or property damage; 
        or
            ``(ii) the information is exempt under the provisions of 
        section 552(b)(1) of title 5, United States Code.
    ``(B) The Secretary shall ensure that any personally identifiable 
information, including Social Security numbers and passport numbers, is 
removed from any manifest signed, produced, delivered, or 
electronically transmitted under this section before access to the 
manifest is provided to the public.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect on the date that is 30 days after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.

            Passed the Senate March 9, 2023.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
118th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 758

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To amend the Tariff Act of 1930 to protect personally identifiable 
                  information, and for other purposes.
```
#### Misselbeck v. Greime, appellant.

*Evidence*— *admissions.*

A witness for plaintiff, who had testified to an admission by defendant, was asked upon cross-examination: “ How much did defendant say he owed plaintiff at that time and in that conversation ?” *Held,*that the question was proper, and not in conflict with the rule in *Mouse*v. *Whited,*25 N. Y. 176.

*S. W. Jackson,*for appellant.

*T. S. Westbrook,*for respondent.

P. Potter, J.

Appeal from a judgment entered upon the report of a referee. The opinion is devoted to a review of the evidence, and contains nothing of importance for publication not embraced in the head note,

*Judgment affirtned.*
Exhibit 99.8
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANESOXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 June 20, 2008
  /s/  Peter R. DoddName:
    
    Peter R. DoddTitle:
    
    Chief Financial Officer
§ 1330.22 Composition of peer review panel. ( a ) The Director selects as members of a peer review panel scientists and other experts in disability, independent living, rehabilitation or related fields who are qualified, on the basis of training, knowledge, or experience, to give expert advice on the merit of the applications under review.
( b ) The scientific peer review process shall be conducted by individuals who are not Department of Health and Human Services employees.
( c ) In selecting members to serve on a peer review panel, the Director may take into account the following factors: ( 1 ) The level of formal scientific or technical education completed by potential panel members.
( 2 ) The extent to which potential panel members have engaged in scientific, technical, or administrative activities appropriate to the category of applications that the panel will consider; the roles of potential panel members in those activities; and the quality of those activities.
( 3 ) The recognition received by potential panel members as reflected by awards and other honors from scientific and professional agencies and organizations outside the Department.
( 4 ) Whether the panel includes knowledgeable individuals with disabilities, or parents, family members, guardians, advocates, or authorized representatives of individuals with disabilities.
( 5 ) Whether the panel includes individuals from diverse populations.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on September 28, 2006, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq*. (“the Act”), IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, eCollege, Denver, CO; Information Management Specialists, Inc., Montgomery, AL; Oracle Corporation, Redwood Shores, CA; Respondus, Inc., Redmond, WA; and Intrallect Ltd., Linlithgow, Scotland, United Kingdom have been added as parties to this venture.                

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc., intends to file additional written notification disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On April 7, 2000, IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on September 13, 2000 (65 FR 55283).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on July 6, 2006. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on August 9, 2006 (71 FR 45580).                

Dated: 

Patricia A. Brink,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 06-8946 Filed 10-27-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
1

Option 1: Basics & Committee Operations

10:15 AM — Webinar Log-in Begins 

10:30 AM - 12:00 PM — Basics for Beginners

• Committee organization

• Contributions limits and prohibitions

• Filing information 

12:00 - 1:00 PM — Lunch Break

1:00 - 2:30 PM — Committee Operations, Part 1

• Redesignations and reattributions

• Volunteer activity and exemptions

• Earmarked contributions

• Joint fundraising 

• Reporting scenarios

2:30 - 2:45 PM — Break 

2:45 - 4:15 PM — Committee Operations, Part 2

• Support from the candidate

• Use of campaign funds

• Staff advances

• Non-federal vs. federal fundraising

• Reporting scenarios

Option 2: Committee Operations Only

12:45 PM — Webinar Log-in Begins 

1:00 - 2:30 PM — Committee Operations, Part 1

• Redesignations and reattributions

• Volunteer activity and exemptions

• Earmarked contributions

• Joint fundraising 

• Reporting scenarios

2:30 - 2:45 PM — Break 

2:45 - 4:15 PM — Committee Operations, Part 2

• Support from the candidate

• Use of campaign funds

• Staff advances

• Non-federal vs. federal fundraising

• Reporting scenarios

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 2022 WEBINAR SERIES 

Federal Election Commission 

2022 Webinar for Candidates and their Committees

March 23, 2022—10:30 AM - 4:15 PM (Eastern Time)