alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 218 (Monday, November 13, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 66110]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9113]



[[Page 66110]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[DOD-2006-OS-0133; RIN 0790-AI06]

32 CFR Part 245


Plan for the Emergency Security Control of Air Traffic (ESCAT)

AGENCY: Department of Defense.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document amends the final rule published on the national 
plan for security control of air traffic during air defense emergencies 
to make administrative adjustments and includes correcting the 
effective date of the final rule, and removes references to State and 
regional disaster airlift (SARDA), rescinded by the Federal Aviation 
Administration on March 17, 2005.

DATES: The effective date for the final rule published at 71 FR 61889, 
October 20, 2006, is corrected to read: January 18, 2007.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Gerald F. Pease, Jr., (703) 697-
6937.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On October 20, 2006 the Department of 
Defense published a final rule on Plan for the Emergency Security 
Control of Air Traffic (ESCAT) which contained errors and outdated 
criteria.
    In rule FR Doc. E6-17179 published on October 20, 2006, (71 FR 
61889), make the following corrections:
    1. On page 61889, in the first column, in the DATES section, revise 
the effective date to read January 18, 2007.


Sec.  245.5  [Corrected]

0
2. On page 61890, in the third column, remove the term State and 
regional disaster airlift (SARDA) and its definition from Sec.  245.5.


Sec.  245.6  [Corrected]

0
3. On page 61891, in the first column, remove ``SARDA--State and 
Regional Disaster Airlift'' from the list of acronyms in Sec.  245.6.


Sec.  245.22  [Corrected]

0
4. On page 61894, under Sec.  245.22, in the second column, remove 
paragraph (d) and redesignate paragraph (e) as paragraph (d).

    Dated: November 2, 2006.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, DoD.
[FR Doc. 06-9113 Filed 11-9-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

IN RE:

Robert G Schweigert

DEBTOR

CASE NO. 16 B 28973

CHAPTER 13

JUDGE DEBORAH L. THORNE

NOTICE OF FINAL CURE PAYMENT

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 3002.1(f), the Chapter 13 Trustee, Marilyn O Marshall 

files this Notice of Final Cure Payment. The amount required to cure the default in the claim listed below 

has been paid in full.

Name of Creditor: Nationstar Mortgage LLC

Final Cure Amount

Court

Claim #

Claim

Asserted

Claim

Allowed

Amount

Paid

2 $247.13 $247.13 $247.13

Total Amount Paid by Trustee $247.13

Account

Number

XXXXXXXX6819

Monthly Ongoing Mortgage Payment

Mortgage is Paid:

 Through the Chapter 13 Conduit X Direct by the Debtor

Within 21 days of the service of the Notice of Final Cure Payment, the creditor MUST file and serve a 

Statement as a supplement to the holder’s proof of claim on the Debtor, Debtor's Counsel and the Chapter 

13 Trustee, pursuant to Fed.R.Bank.P.3002.1(g), indicating 1) whether it agrees that the Debtor has paid 

in full the amount required to cure the default on the claim; and 2) whether the Debtor is otherwise current 

on all payments consistent with 11 U.S.C. § 1322(b)(5). 

The statement shall itemize the required cure or post-petition amounts, if any, that the holder contends 

remain unpaid as of the date of the statement. The statement shall be filed as a supplement to the 

holder’s proof of claim and is not subject to Rule 3001(f). Failure to notify may result in sanctions.

Case 16-28973 Doc 64 Filed 12/01/17 Entered 12/01/17 12:43:16 Desc Page 1

 of 2
CASE NO. 16 B 28973

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing Notice of Final Cure Payment was served on the parties 

listed below by ordinary U.S. Mail or served electronically through the Court’s ECF System at the e-mail 

address registered with the Court on this 1st day of December, 2017.

Robert G Schweigert, 230 Desmond Dr, Schaumburg, IL 60193

ELECTRONIC SERVICE - Derrick B Hager PC, 245 W Roosevelt Rd Bldg 15 Ste 119, West Chicago, 

IL 60185

Nationstar Mortgage LLC, P O Box 619094, Dallas, TX 75261-9741

ELECTRONIC SERVICE - United States Trustee

Date: December 01, 2017

Marilyn O Marshall

Chapter 13 Trustee

224 S Michigan Ave

Ste 800

Chicago, IL 60604

/s/ Marilyn O Marshall

Case 16-28973 Doc 64 Filed 12/01/17 Entered 12/01/17 12:43:16 Desc Page 2

 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 934 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 934

 To amend the Department of Energy Organization Act to assign certain 
  functions to the Assistant Secretaries of Energy relating to energy 
        emergencies and energy security, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 22, 2023

   Mr. Barrasso (for himself, Mr. Risch, Mr. Crapo, and Ms. Collins) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
               Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Department of Energy Organization Act to assign certain 
  functions to the Assistant Secretaries of Energy relating to energy 
        emergencies and energy security, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ENERGY EMERGENCY AND ENERGY SECURITY FUNCTIONS ASSIGNED TO 
              ASSISTANT SECRETARIES OF ENERGY.

    (a) In General.--Section 203(a) of the Department of Energy 
Organization Act (42 U.S.C. 7133(a)) is amended--
            (1) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), in the second 
        sentence, by striking ``, but are not limited to,''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(12) Energy emergency and energy security functions, 
        including--
                    ``(A) responsibilities with respect to 
                infrastructure, cybersecurity, emerging threats, 
                supply, and emergency planning, coordination, response, 
                and restoration; and
                    ``(B) on request of a State, local, or Tribal 
                government or energy sector entity, and in consultation 
                with other Federal agencies, as appropriate, provision 
                of technical assistance, support, and response 
                capabilities with respect to energy security threats, 
                risks, and incidents.''.
    (b) Coordination.--The Secretary of Energy shall ensure that the 
functions of the Secretary of Energy described in paragraph (12) of 
section 203(a) of the Department of Energy Organization Act (42 U.S.C. 
7133(a)) are performed in coordination with relevant Federal agencies.
                                 <all>
```
§ 1173.1 Policy on employee indemnification. ( a ) This part explains when the National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH) will indemnify you, an employee or a former employee of NEH, against a verdict, judgment, or other monetary award that a court or other competent authority renders against you. When NEH indemnifies you against a verdict, judgment, or other monetary award, it means that NEH will pay the amounts that the court orders you to pay.
( b ) This part also explains when NEH will settle a claim (also referred to as compromising a claim) that someone brings or threatens to bring against you in court or before another competent authority. It is only in exceptional circumstances that NEH will agree to settle a claim before a court or other competent authority has entered a verdict, judgment, or monetary award against you.
( c ) In order for NEH to indemnify you or settle a claim: ( 1 ) The verdict, judgment, or monetary award to be paid or the claim to be settled must relate to something that you did (or failed to do) within the scope of your employment with NEH; and
( 2 ) The Chairperson of NEH or someone the Chairperson designates (the Agency Official) must determine, as a matter of discretion, that indemnifying you or settling the claim would be in the interest of NEH.
( d ) If you become aware that someone has made or may make a claim against you personally as a result of something that you did (or failed to do) within the scope of your employment, you must immediately notify the Office of the General Counsel.
( e ) To request that NEH indemnify you or settle a claim against you, you must submit a written request to the Office of the General Counsel. You must include a copy of the verdict, judgment, monetary award, or settlement proposal, as appropriate. The Office of the General Counsel may consult about the matter with your supervisor, other agency employees, and the Department of Justice.
( f ) The Agency Official may waive the requirements of paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section if it would be in the interest of NEH to do so.
( g ) If the Agency Official determines that NEH will indemnify you or settle a claim on your behalf, NEH's commitment will be subject to the availability of appropriated funds. The Agency Official may impose other conditions or limitations on the determination at his or her discretion.
( h ) If the Chairperson requests indemnification or settlement of a claim, the General Counsel will perform the functions assigned to the Chairperson under this section with respect to that request.
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-21-00298-CV

MARVIN HAWKINS,

Appellant

v.

SENTRY CASUALTY COMPANY,

Appellee

From the 414th District Court

McLennan County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019-572-5

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Marvin Hawkins’ notice of appeal was filed on November 15, 2021. In a letter 

dated November 16, 2021, the Clerk of this Court notified Hawkins that the appeal was 

subject to dismissal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1. In the same letter, Hawkins was also warned 

that the Court would dismiss the appeal without further notification unless, within 14 

days from the date of the letter, a response was filed showing grounds for continuing the 

appeal. More than 14 days have passed, and Hawkins has not responded.
Hawkins v. Sentry Cas. Co. Page 2

Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for the failure to comply with a notice from 

the Clerk requiring a response or other action within a specified time. See TEX. R. APP. P. 

42.3(c).

TOM GRAY

Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Johnson, and 

Justice Smith

Appeal dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed January 5, 2022

[CV06]
July 2, 2015



### JUDGMENT


## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

BRIDGEWATER COMMUNITY ASSOCIATIO N , Appellant

NO. 14

- 14

- 00333

- CV V.

DREW LEE GREEN , Appellee

___ _____________________________ This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of a ppellee, Drew Lee Green, signed April 3, 2014, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find no error in the judgment. We order the judgm ent of
the court below AFFIRMED

. We order appellant, Bridgewater Community Association, to pay all costs incurred in this appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Spicy Pickle Franchising, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2006, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Marc Geman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


/s/ MARC GEMAN
-------------------------------------------
Marc Geman
Chief Executive Officer
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO 
  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Drew Bonnell, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Eden Energy Corp.
      for the period ended September 30, 2010 (the "Report") fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934; and
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Eden Energy Corp.                                                                     

Dated: November 10, 2010

| | /s/
      Drew Bonnell                                              
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------
| | Drew Bonnell                                                        
| | Secretary, Treasurer and CFO                                        
| | (Principal Financial Officer and Principal
      Accounting Officer)
| | Eden Energy Corp.                                                   

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Eden Energy
Corp. and will be retained by Eden Energy Corp. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
§ 254.11 Exchanges at approximately equal value. ( a ) The authorized officer may exchange lands which are of approximately equal value upon a determination that: ( 1 ) The exchange is in the public interest and the consummation of the proposed exchange will be expedited;
( 2 ) The value of the lands to be conveyed out of Federal ownership is not more than $150,000 as based upon a statement of value prepared by a qualified appraiser and accepted by an authorized officer;
( 3 ) The Federal and non-Federal lands are substantially similar in location, acreage, use, and physical attributes; and
( 4 ) There are no significant elements of value requiring complex analysis.
( b ) The authorized officer, not the non-Federal party, determines whether the Federal and non-Federal lands are approximately equal in value and must document how the determination was made.
49–008 

109TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2d Session 109–598 

WAIVING POINTS OF ORDER AGAINST THE CONFERENCE 

REPORT TO ACCOMPANY S. 250, CARL D. PERKINS CAREER AND TECHNICAL EDUCATION IMPROVEMENT ACT 

OF 2005 

JULY 25, 2006.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mr. BISHOP of Utah, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 946] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 946, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House 

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution waives all points of order against the conference 

report to accompany S. 250, the Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Improvement Act of 2005, and against its consideration. The rule provides that the conference report shall be considered as read. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARING
EXHIBIT 31.1





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO


SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Kai-Shing Tao (the registrant's principal executive officer), certify that:





|   |                                                                                
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Remark Holdings, Inc., and




|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.







Date: April 30, 2019





By:/s/ Kai-Shing TaoKai-Shing TaoChief Executive Officer and Chairman
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          53,937
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,835
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,016
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                74,777
<PP&E>                                          19,502
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,240
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 146,499
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,166
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            47
<OTHER-SE>                                     136,286
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   146,499
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,275
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,039
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                28,826
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (16,621)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (16,621)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.36)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### Jacob Bernstein, Respondent, *v.*John J. Kinneally, as Treasurer of the Socialist Labor Party, et al., Appellants.

(Argued March 11, 1907;

decided April 2, 1907.)

*Bernstein*v. *Kinneally,*113 App. Div. 905, affirmed.

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered May 29, 1906, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial, in an action for libel.

*Benjamin Patterson*for appellants.

*Nathan Burlmn*for respondent. ■

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock and Chase, JJ.
#### James Durant, as Administrator of the Estate of John H. Durant, Deceased, Respondent, *v.*Village of Solvay, Appellant.

*Durant*v. *Village of Solvay,*116 App. Div. 923, affirmed.

(Argued December 9, 1907;

decided December 20, 1907.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered January 5, 1907, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover for the death of plaintiff’s intestate alleged to have occurred through the defendant’s negligence.

*La/mont Stilwell*for appellant.

*Walter Welch*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Hiscock, JJ.
# Communication Costs Table 1

&"Arial,Bold"&10&KFF0000This table was generated on 5/19/20.