alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

ONE HUNDRED SIXTH CONGRESS 

FIRST SESSION { CONVENEDJANUARY6,1999 

SECOND SESSION { 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Wednesday, March 10, 1999 

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF GARY SISCO, 

SECRETARY OF THE SENATE 

By Michelle Haynes, Executive Clerk 
1 

RESOLUTIONS 

CALENDAR Ex.REs REPORTED 

No. No. SUBJECT BY 
2 

TREATIES 

CALENDAR TREATY REPORTED 

No. Doc. No. SUBJECT BY 
3 

NOMINATIONS 

CALENDAR MESSAGE REPORTED 

No. No. NOMINEE, OFFICE, AND PREDECESSOR BY 

EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT 

* 1 1-15 Susan G. Esserman, of Maryland, to be Deputy Jan 22, 99 Reported by Mr. Roth, 

United States Trade Representative, with the Committee on Finance, without 

rank of Ambassador, vice Jeffrey M. Lang, printed report. 

resigned. 

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 

* 2 1-18 Timothy F. Geithner, of New York, to be an Jan 22, 99 Reported by Mr. Roth, 

Under Secretary of the Treasury, vice David A. Committee on Finance, without 

Lipton. printed report. 

* 3 1-19 Gary Gensler, ofMaryland, to be an Under Jan 22, 99 Reported by Mr. Roth, 

Secretary of the Treasury, vice John D. Committee on Finance, without 

Hawke, Jr. printed report. 

* 4 3-5 Edwin M. Truman, of Maryland, to be a Deputy Jan 22, 99 Reported by Mr. Roth, 

Under Secretary of the Treasury, vice Timothy Committee on Finance, without 

F. Geithner. printed report. 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

* 8 1-20 T. J. Glauthier, of California, to be Deputy Feb 25, 99 Reported by Mr. 

Secretary of Energy, vice Elizabeth Anne Murkowski, Committee on 

Moler. Energy and Natural Resources, 

without printed report. 

*Signifies nominee's commitment to respond to requests to appear and testify before any duly constituted committee of the Senate 
4 

NOMINATIONS PLACED ON THE SECRETARY'S DESK
#### § 905.737-101 Applicable provisions of law.

Former employees of the Corporation must abide by the provisions of 18 U.S.C. 207 and 5 CFR 737.1 through 737.25, which bar certain acts by former Government employees that may reasonably give the appearance of making unfair use of prior Government employment and affiliations. Violation of those provisions will give rise to Corporation enforcement proceedings as provided in § 905.737-102, and may also result in criminal sanctions, as provided in 18 U.S.C. 207.

[48 FR 38233, Aug. 23, 1984]
**Exhibit 12(b)**

 

CERTIFICATION

 

I, W. PeterDay, certify that:

 

1.     Ihave reviewed the annual report on Form 20-F of Amcor Limited;

 

2.     Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

 

3.     Thecompany’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15(d)-15(e)) for the company and have:

 

(a)           Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared; and

 

(b)           Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation.

 

4.     Thecompany’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’sauditors and audit committee of the company’s board of directors:

 

(c)           Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

(d)           Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the company’s internal control over financialreporting

 

Date: December 30, 2005

 

 
|   |   /s/ W. Peter Day                           |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   Name: W. Peter Day                         |
|   |   Title: Executive General  Manager, Finance |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 225 (Wednesday, November 22, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 67643]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9338]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production act of 1933--Southwest Research Institute: Cooperative 
Research Group on High Efficiency Durable Gasoline Engine

    Notice is hereby given that, on September 27, 2006, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Southwest Research 
Institute: Cooperative Research Group on High Efficiency Durable 
Gasoline Engine (``HEDGE'') has filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were 
filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the 
recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified 
circumstances. Specifically, Federal Mogul Corporation, Plymouth, MI 
has been added as a party to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and HEDGE intends to file additional 
written notification disclosing all changes in membership.
    On June 10, 2005, HEDGE filed its original notification pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice 
in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on July 7, 
2005 (70 FR 39339).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on August 7, 
2006. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on September 8, 2006 (71 FR 53134).

Patricia A. Brink,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 06-9338 Filed 11-21-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
###### Editorial Note on Part 1303

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1303 appear at 89 FR 67816, Aug. 21, 2024.

#### § 1303.40 Purpose.

This subpart prescribes what a grant recipient must establish to show it is eligible to purchase, construct and renovate facilities as outlined in section 644(c), (f) and (g) of the Act. It explains how a grant recipient may apply for funds, details what measures a grant recipient must take to protect federal interest in facilities purchased, constructed or renovated with grant funds, and concludes with other administrative provisions. This subpart applies to major renovations. It only applies to minor renovations and repairs, when they are included with a purchase application and are part of purchase costs.
### Request for Additional Info rmation - Travis Neuber 9-AWA-AVS-333Exemptions (FAA)

Dear Mr. Neuber:
This letter is to inform yo u that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA-2015-2356). Th is information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

 Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Operat ions Manual (MPTOM) which is required by Order 89 00.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1. If you wish for us to proceed without this m anual and remove closed

- set filming from your proposed operation please inform of us of your intention by the requested response date listed below.

Please submit the addi tional information (non

- proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any propri etary information to t he FAA Headquarters or electronically via email to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want us to process your request any further, we must receive t he information described above by 9/10/2015. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without no tifying you further.
If you have any questions, please fe el free to contact us (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

Jake Troutman
Thank you for your intere st in aviation safety. FAA Office of Rulemakin g Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2015 11:49 AM To: travis.neuber@ hotmail.com Cc: May, Rick (FAA) Pa g e 1 of 1 Request for Additional In formation - Travis Neube r

8/26/2015 htt p s://email.dot. g ov/owa/9-AWA-AVS-333Exem p tions @ faa. g ov/?ae=Item&t=IPM.Note

...
§ 13.1154 Commercial vessel permits and conditions. Each commercially operated motor vessel must have a permit to operate in Glacier Bay National Park and Preserve in accordance with § 5.3 of this chapter. ( a ) A cruise ship must have a concession contract to operate in Glacier Bay.
( b ) A tour vessel, charter vessel, and passenger ferry must have a commercial authorization to operate in Glacier Bay.
( c ) The operator of a cruise ship, tour vessel, charter vessel, and passenger ferry must notify the Bartlett Cove Ranger Station of the vessel's entry into Glacier Bay within 48 hours in advance of entering Glacier Bay or immediately upon entry.
( d ) Cruise ships and tour vessels are prohibited from operating in the Beardslee Entrance and at the entrance to Adams Inlet, as defined as waters within the Wilderness boundaries in those respective areas.
( e ) Off-boat activity from a cruise ship, tour vessel, or charter vessel is prohibited, unless authorized by the superintendent.
( f ) Off-boat activity from a passenger ferry is prohibited, except for passenger access at the Bartlett Cove docks.
( g ) A passenger ferry must travel a direct course between the mouth of Glacier Bay and Bartlett Cove, except when the vessel is granted safe harbor by the Superintendent as stated in § 13.1156(e).
**EXHIBIT 32.2****CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT****Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**          In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of The Meridian Resource Corporation (the“Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Form 10-K/A”), I, Michael J. Mayell, President of the Company,certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1. The Form 10-K/A fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Form 10-K/A fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.Date: April 29, 2008                                             /s/ Michael J. Mayell   Michael J. Mayell   President
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Frederio W. Shepard, Respondent, *v.*William B. Ellison, as Commissioner of Water Supply, Gas and Electricity of the City of New York, Appellant.

(Argued April 23, 1907;

decided May 7, 1907.)

*People ex rel. Shepard*v. *Ellison,*114 App. Div. 920, affirmed.

. Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered August 10, 1906, upon an order which affirmed an order of Sjiecial Term granting a motion for a peremptory writ of mandamus to compel the defendant to restore the' relator to the position of clerk in the department of water supply, gas and electricity in the city of Hew York.

*William B.*Ellison, *Corporation Counsel (James D. Bell*of counsel), for appellant.

*Samxiel II.*Ordway, *Conrad Saxe Keyes*and *Frederic White Shepard*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion on the previous appeal (181 H. Y. 339).

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Hiscook, JJ.
§ 1260.80 What actions must NARA take when information in its physical and legal custody is reclassified after declassification under proper authority? ( a ) When information in the physical and legal custody of NARA that has been available for public use following declassification under proper authority is proposed for reclassification in accordance with 32 CFR 2001.13(b)(1), NARA shall take the following actions: ( 1 ) The agency head making the determination to reclassify the information shall notify the Archivist of the potential reclassification in writing,
( 2 ) The Archivist shall suspend public access pending approval or disapproval by the Director of the Information Security Oversight Office of the reclassification request, and
( 3 ) The Director of the Information Oversight Office shall normally make a decision on the validity of the reclassification request within 30 days, and
( 4 ) The decision of the Director of ISOO may be appealed by the Archivist or the agency head to the President through the National Security Advisor.
( 5 ) Access shall remain suspended pending a prompt decision on the appeal.
( b ) [Reserved]
Default - Rule 55A (CO 40 Revised-6/2019) 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT AND BANKRUPTCY COURTS

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Plaintiff(s)

Civil Action: 

v.

Defendant(s)

RE:

DEFAULT

It appearing that the above-named defendant(s) failed to plead or otherwise defend this action though 

duly served on , and an affidavit 

on behalf of the plaintiff having been filed, it is this day of , declared 

that defendant(s) is/are in default.

ANGELA D. CAESAR, Clerk

By: 

Deputy Clerk 

CAMPAIGN LEGAL CENTER 

20-cv-01778-RCL FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

with summons and copy of the complaint 07/01/2020 13th September 2020 /s/Jackie Francis

Case 1:20-cv-01778-RCL Document 7 Filed 09/13/20 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 213 (Friday, November 3, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 64704]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9083]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Meeting

    Time and Date: 10 a.m.--November 8, 2006.
    Place: 800 North Capitol Street, NW., First Floor Hearing Room, 
Washington, DC.
    Status: Closed.
    Matters To Be Considered:
1. Docket No. 02-08--Odyssea Stevedoring of Puerto Rico, Inc. v. Puerto 
Rico Ports Authority;
2. Docket No. 04-01--International Shipping Agency, Inc. v. the Puerto 
Rico Ports Authority;
3. Docket No. 04-06--San Antonio Maritime Corp. and Antilles Cement 
Corp. v. Puerto Rico Ports Authority;
4. Docket No. 99-16--Carolina Marine Handling, Inc. v. South Carolina 
State Ports Authority, Charleston Naval Complex Redevelopment 
Authority, Charleston International Projects, Inc. and Charleston 
International Ports, LLC;
5. Docket No. 06-01--Worldwide Relocations, Inc., All-in-One Shipping, 
Inc., Boston Logistics Corp., Around the World Shipping, Inc., 
Tradewind Consulting, Inc., Global Direct Shipping, Megan K. Karpick 
(a.k.a. Catherine Kaiser, Kathryn Kaiser, Catherine Kerpick, Megan 
Kaiser and Alexandria Hudson), Martin J. McKenzie, Patrick John 
Costadoni, Elizabeth F. Hudson, Sharon Fachler, and Oren Fachler, et 
al.--Possible Violations of Sections 8, 10 and 19 of the Shipping Act 
of 1984 and the Commission's Regulations at 46 CFR 515.3, 515.21 and 
520.3.
    Contact Person for More Information: Bryant L. VanBrakle, 
Secretary, (202) 523-5725.

Karen V. Gregory,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 06-9083 Filed 11-1-06; 2:05 pm]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-M
#### Francis Conlon, Respondent, *v.*The City of New York, Appellant.

(Argued April 25, 1907;

decided May 10, 1907.)

*Conlon*v. *City of New York,*112 App. Div. 912, affirmed.

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the tirst judicial department, entered April 12, 1906, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover damages alleged to have been caused to plaintiff’s property through defendant’s negligence in failing to provide a proper outlet for a sewer.

*William B. Ellison, Corporation^ Covmsel (Theodore Connoly*and *Royal E. T. Riggs*of counsel), for appellant.

*Charles Maitland Beattie*and *Joseph P. Hennessy*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Hiscook, JJ. Not voting: Haight, J.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 33 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.Con.Res.33
                                        Agreed to April 17, 2024        

                     One Hundred Eighteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
         the third day of January, two thousand and twenty four

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring),

SECTION 1. HONORING THE LAST SURVIVING MEDAL OF HONOR RECIPIENT OF THE 
              KOREAN CONFLICT.

    (a) Use of Rotunda.--In recognition of Army Colonel Ralph Puckett, 
Jr., the last surviving recipient of the Medal of Honor for acts 
performed during the Korean conflict, his remains shall be permitted to 
lie in honor in the rotunda of the Capitol on April 29, 2024, in order 
to honor the Silent Generation and the more than 5,700,000 men and 
women who served in the Armed Forces of the United States during the 
``Forgotten War'' from 1950 to 1953.
    (b) Implementation.--The Architect of the Capitol, under the 
direction of the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of 
the House of Representatives, shall take all necessary steps to carry 
out this section.
Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.
```
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration
No. 333-140237) pertaining to the AeroVironment, Inc. Nonqualified Stock Option Plan, the AeroVironment, Inc. Directors' Nonqualified Stock Option Plan, the
AeroVironment, Inc. 2002 Equity Incentive Plan, and the AeroVironment, Inc. 2006 Equity Incentive Plan of our reports dated June 21, 2011, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements and schedule of AeroVironment, Inc. and subsidiaries and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of AeroVironment, Inc., and subsidiaries
included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended April 30, 2011.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP


Los
Angeles, California
June 21, 2011

---



QuickLinks
#### § 1326.90 Notice of hearing or opportunity for hearing.

Proceedings are commenced by mailing a notice of hearing or opportunity for hearing from the Secretary, or his or her designee, to the State Council on Developmental Disabilities and the Designated State Agency, or to the State Protection and Advocacy System or designating official. The notice must state the time and place for the hearing and the issues that will be considered. The notice must be published in the Federal Register.
#### § 1174.11 Referral of complaint and answer to the ALJ.

When the reviewing official receives an answer, he or she must simultaneously file the complaint, the answer, and a designation of the authority's representative with the ALJ.
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

1 

49–012 2006

109th Congress, 2d Session – – – – – – – – – – – – House Document 109–124 

WITHDRAWAL FOR A REQUEST FOR FY 2006 BUDGET 

AMENDMENTS 

COMMUNICATION 

FROM

THE DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF 

MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET, 

THE EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE 

PRESIDENT 

TRANSMITTING

WITHDRAWAL OF THE REQUEST FOR A FY 2006 FULLY OFFSET 

PROPOSAL TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL FUNDS FOR THE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS ACCOUNT WITHIN THE DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS 

JULY 18, 2006.—Referred to the Committee on Appropriations and ordered 

to be printed 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with REPORTSE:\Seals\Congress.#13

jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with REPORTS
(3) 

EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT, 

OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET, 

Washington, DC, July 18, 2006. 

Hon. J. Dennis Hastert, 

Speaker of the House of Representatives, 

Washington, DC. 

DEAR MR. SPEAKER: On June 28, 2006, the President asked the 

Congress to consider a fully offset FY 2006 request for $160.5 million of additional funding for the Department of Veterans Affairs 

(VA) to address the security of personally identifiable information 

of veterans and military service personnel. 

On May 3, 2006, a VA laptop and hard drive were stolen containing confidential information on personal records of certain veterans and service members. To mitigate the risk of the inappropriate use of this information, this request would have funded credit monitoring services for personnel impacted by this theft and security breach. 

Since the transmittal of the funding package, the stolen laptop 

and hard drive have been recovered and the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s (FBI’s) forensic examination of the equipment has 

been completed. The FBI has a high degree of confidence—based on 

the results of the forensic tests and other information gathered 

during the investigation—that the sensitive data files were not 

accessed or compromised. 

On the basis of the FBI’s analysis, the Administration has concluded that credit monitoring services and the associated funding 

will no longer be necessary. Therefore, on behalf of the President, 

I am withdrawing this funding request and associated offset proposals from further Congressional consideration. 

Sincerely, 

ROB PORTMAN. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with REPORTS
This table was published on 5/19/20.

Amount

Presidential Candidates

Communications Costs for Democrats $0

Communications Costs Against Democrats $0

Communications Costs for Republicans $0

Communications Costs Against Republicans $0

Communications Costs for Others $0

Communications Costs Against Others $0

Total $0

Congressional Candidates

Communications Costs for Democrats $51,054

Communications Costs Against Democrats $0

Communications Costs for Republicans $113,440

Communications Costs Against Republicans $0

Communications Costs for Others $0

Communications Costs Against Others $0

Total $164,494

Communication Costs Table 2*

Communication Costs by Corporations and Membership Organizations 

January 1, 2019 through March 31, 2020

*52 U.S.C. 30118 allows “communications by a corporation to its stockholders and executive or administrative personnel 

and their families or by a labor organization to its members and their families on any subject,” including the express 

advocacy of the election or defeat of any Federal candidate. The costs of such communications must be reported to the 

Federal Election Commission under certain circumstances.
EXHIBIT 15(a)
                                                                   -------------




May 15, 2002

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

Commissioners:

We are aware that our report dated May 8, 2002 on our review of interim
financial information of Insilco Holding Co. (the "Company") as of and for the
period ended March 31, 2002 and included in the Company's quarterly report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter then ended is incorporated by reference in the
Company's registration statements on Form S-3, Registration Nos. 333-63563 and
333-65039 and on Form S-8, Registration Nos. 333-61809 and 333-61811.

Very truly yours,




/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Columbus, Ohio