alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1302.24 Locally-designed program option variations. ( a ) *Waiver option.* Programs may request to operate a locally-designed program option, including a combination of program options, to better meet the unique needs of their communities or to demonstrate or test alternative approaches for providing program services. In order to operate a locally-designed program option, programs must seek a waiver as described in this section and must deliver the full range of services, consistent with § 1302.20(b), and demonstrate how any change to their program design is consistent with achieving program goals in subpart J of this part.
( b ) *Request for approval.* A program's request to operate a locally-designed variation may be approved by the responsible HHS official through the end of a program's current grant or, if the request is submitted through a grant application for an upcoming project period, for the project period of the new award. Such approval may be revoked based on progress toward program goals as described in § 1302.102 and monitoring as described in § 1304.2.
( c ) *Waiver requirements.* ( 1 ) The responsible HHS official may waive one or more of the requirements contained in §§ 1302.21(b), (c)(1)(i), and (c)(2)(i); 1302.22(a) through (c); and 1302.23(b) and (c) but may not waive ratios or group size for children under 24 months. Center-based locally designed options must meet the minimums described in section 640(k)(1) of the Act for center-based programs.
( 2 ) If the responsible HHS official determines a waiver of group size for center-based services would better meet the needs of children and families in a community, the group size may not exceed the limits below: ( i ) A group that serves children 24 to 36 months of age must have no more than ten children; and,
( ii ) A group that serves predominantly three-year-old children must have no more than twenty children; and,
( iii ) A group that serves predominantly four-year-old children must have no more than twenty-four children.
( 3 ) If the responsible HHS official approves a waiver to allow a program to operate below the minimums described in § 1302.21(c)(2)(i), a program must meet the requirements described in § 1302.21(c)(2)(ii), or in the case of a double session variation, a program must meet the requirements described in § 1302.21(c)(2)(iii).
( 4 ) In order to receive a waiver under this section, a program must provide supporting evidence that demonstrates the locally-designed variation effectively supports appropriate development and progress in children's early learning outcomes.
( 5 ) In order to receive a waiver of service duration, a program must meet the requirement in paragraph (c)(4) of this section, provide supporting evidence that it better meets the needs of parents than the applicable service duration minimums described in § 1302.21(c)(1) and (c)(2)(i), § 1302.22(c), or § 1302.23(c), and assess the effectiveness of the variation in supporting appropriate development and progress in children's early learning outcomes.
[81 FR 61412, Sept. 6, 2016, as amended at 89 FR 67810, Aug. 21, 2024]
#### § 1159.3 Where should individuals send inquiries about the Endowment's systems of records or implementation of the Privacy Act?

Inquiries about the Endowment's systems of records or implementation of the Privacy Act should be sent to the following address: National Endowment for the Arts; Office of the General Counsel; 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW; Room 518; Washington, DC 20506.
Commitment

We are committed to continually seek personal 

and operational growth opportunities to 

preserve the positive reputation of the OIG. 

We pledge our dedication to persistently 

enhance our skillsets in efforts to uphold the 

integrity of the FEC.

Respect

We are devoted to creating a professional 

and positive work environment in which all 

colleagues and stakeholders are treated with 

the utmost respect. We welcome, value, and 

embrace the diversity of everyone and behave 

respectfully to all with whom we interact.

Service

We pride ourselves in providing a nonconfrontational, value-added service to 

customers through objective, accurate, and 

timely evaluations of OIG inquiries in support 

of FEC operations and procedures.

Honesty

We are honest, fair, and true to ourselves, 

to each other, and to our customers, which 

is reflected in our reputation. We behave 

with the highest levels of integrity, which is 

fundamental to who we are as a team.

Collaboration

We strive to collaborate and build key 

relationships within the OIG community 

and the FEC in order to improve program 

operations, efficiencies, and effectiveness. 

We universally work together to identify 

potential opportunities to partner with OIG 

stakeholders in efforts to resolve Government 

wide concerns and maximize the value to the 

citizens of the United States.

Balance

We aim to balance customer needs with the 

mission of the OIG and FEC while assuring 

all endeavors of our work reflect transparent 

and unbiased processes. We apply this 

practice through our application of due 

regard for our peers, our beliefs, our family, 

and our stakeholders.

Federal Election Commission | Office of the Inspector General

CORE VALUES
#### Mary Kenny et al., as Executrices of Esther Walsh, Deceased, Respondents, *v.*Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Appellant.

*Walsh*v. *Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.,*119 App. Div. 928, affirmed.

(Submitted December 5, 1907;

decided December 20, 1907.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered

*546May 15, 1907, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover on a policy of life insurance.

*Isaiah Fellows*and *D. G. McFlwain*for appellant.

*John W. Roddy*for respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., O’Brien, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Vann and Hiscock, JJ. Not"sitting: Chase, J.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10(z)





                                        August 23, 2000

Mr. Allen Weintraub


Re:      Adjustment to Supplemental Retirement Benefit

Dear Allen:

         Effective as of the effective time of the merger contemplated by the
Agreement and Plan of Merger between The MONY Group, Inc., MONY Acquisition
Corp. and The Advest Group, Inc. (the "Merger Agreement"), The Advest Group,
Inc. (the "Company") hereby agrees to amend the letter agreement between you and
the Company, dated January 28, 1999 (the "Letter Agreement") that amended your
employment agreement dated November 30, 1995. The Letter Agreement is amended as
follows:

1.       Post-Employment Services. The second to last sentence of Paragraph 2 of
         the Letter Agreement shall be eliminated in its entirety and replaced
         with the following sentence: "The amount of the benefit described in
         Section 7(a)(1) of the Employment Agreement shall be treated for all
         purposes to be an amount equal to $300,000."

2.       Charitable Contributions. Paragraph 7 of the Letter Agreement shall be
         deleted in its entirety.

         This agreement shall be of no further force and effect in the event of
the termination of the Merger Agreement prior to the effective time of the
merger. This letter shall be binding upon the Company and its successors and
shall inure to the benefit of your beneficiaries.

                                        Yours truly,



                                        /s/  Grant W. Kurtz
                                        Grant W. Kurtz
                                        Chief Executive Officer

Accepted and Acknowledged:


/s/  Allen Weintraub
-------------------------
Allen Weintraub
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 990 

To require the Commander of the North American Aerospace Defense Command to conduct a gap analysis of the capabilities of the North American 

Aerospace Defense Command. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 27, 2023 

Mr. DAINES introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To require the Commander of the North American Aerospace 

Defense Command to conduct a gap analysis of the capabilities of the North American Aerospace Defense Command. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. GAP ANALYSIS OF NORTH AMERICAN AERO4 SPACE DEFENSE COMMAND CAPABILITIES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Commander of the North 

6 American Aerospace Defense Command shall conduct a 

7 gap analysis of the capabilities of the North American 

8 Aerospace Defense Command, including an analysis of any 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 990 IS

1 limitation that has been or may be exploited by a foreign 

2 country to allow 1 or more air assets of the foreign coun3 try to enter the airspace of the United States or Canada 

4 unnoticed. 

5 (b) REPORT.—Not later than 90 days after the date 

6 of the enactment of this Act, the Commander of the North 

7 American Aerospace Defense Command shall submit to 

8 the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the 

9 House of Representatives a report on the results of the 

10 gap analysis conducted under subsection (a). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
kld-ex105_15.htm



 

Exhibit 10.5

 

 

 

April 23, 2020

 

Christopher Weiler

 

 

Dear Mr. Weiler:

 

You were previously granted an award (the “RSU Award”) of 40,000 restricted stock units (“RSUs”) pursuant to the terms of the KLDiscovery Inc. 2019 Incentive Award Plan (the “Plan”) and an award agreement thereunder (the “RSU Agreement”).  As discussed, set forth below are the terms of our mutual agreement regarding changes in certain terms of the RSUs granted to you.

 

Effective as of the date hereof, you agree to forfeit, for no compensation, all 40,000 of the RSUs subject to the RSU Award (the “Forfeited RSUs”) so that the shares otherwise subject to the Forfeited RSUs may be allocated to other participants in the Plan.  You will cease to have any rights with respect to the Forfeited RSUs as of the date hereof.  

 

Except as expressly set forth in this letter agreement, the RSU Agreement and the terms of your other contracts and compensatory arrangements with the Company remain unchanged and continue in full force and effect in accordance with and subject to their terms.  For the avoidance of doubt, the Retained RSUs will continue to be subject to the terms of the Plan and the RSU Agreement.

 

This letter agreement will be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware, without giving effect to any choice or conflict of laws provision or rule that would cause the application of the laws of any other jurisdiction.

 

Please indicate your agreement to the foregoing by returning a countersigned copy of this letter to me.  

 

Sincerely,

 

/s/ Andy Southam

 

Andy Southam 

General Counsel 

 

 

Accepted and agreed:

 

/s/ Christopher Weiler

Christopher Weiler

 

KLDiscovery Inc

8201 Greensboro Drive, Suite 300kldiscovery.com

McLean, VA 22102
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 212 / Thursday, November 2, 2006 / Presidential Documents 64621 

Proclamation 8078 of October 30, 2006 

National Family Caregivers Month, 2006 

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation 

Our country is blessed to have millions of compassionate citizens who 

bring love and support to family members and friends who are chronically 

ill, elderly, or disabled. During National Family Caregivers Month, we recognize these kind individuals who give of their hearts, resources, and energy 

to assist loved ones in need. 

Family caregivers exemplify the true spirit of compassion by providing 

support to their loved ones and assisting with their everyday activities 

and special needs. These selfless people must often make great personal 

sacrifices to maintain the care and support their family and friends require. 

Their assistance provides those who may be ill, aging, or disabled an opportunity to stay in familiar surroundings and remain a part of their community. 

My Administration is committed to supporting family caregivers and their 

vital role in our Nation’s communities. The National Family Caregiver Support Program continues to provide information, counseling, and services 

and encourages cooperation among agencies and other providers that work 

with caregivers. These efforts assist caregivers and help ensure that all 

Americans receive the care they need. 

As we observe National Family Caregivers Month, we honor family caregivers 

who take time out of their lives to improve the lives of family and friends. 

Their efforts demonstrate the best of the American spirit. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States 

of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution 

and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim November 2006 as National 

Family Caregivers Month. I encourage all Americans to honor the selfless 

service of caregivers who support their loved ones in need. 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with PROPOSALS2
64622 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 212 / Thursday, November 2, 2006 / Presidential Documents 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this thirtieth day 

of October, in the year of our Lord two thousand six, and of the Independence 

of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-first. 

[FR Doc. 06–9063 

Filed 11–1–06; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 3195–01–P 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with PROPOSALS2GWBOLD.EPS</GPH>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

CENTER FOR PUBLIC INTEGRITY,

Plaintiff,

v. 

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION,

Defendant. 

Case No. 17-cv-1162 (CRC)

ORDER

For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby

ORDERED that [ECF No. 12] Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is 

GRANTED. It is further 

ORDERED that [ECF No. 13] Plaintiff’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment is 

DENIED. It is further

ORDERED that [ECF No. 15] Plaintiff’s Motion for In Camera Review is DENIED.

SO ORDERED.

CHRISTOPHER R. COOPER

United States District Judge

Date: September 18, 2018

Case 1:17-cv-01162-CRC Document 22 Filed 09/18/18 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 222 (Friday, November 17, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 67017]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9241]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Fiscal Service


Surety Companies Acceptable on Federal Bonds: Beazley Insurance 
Company, Inc

AGENCY: Financial Management Service, Fiscal Service, Department of the 
Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is Supplement No. 4 to the Treasury Department Circular 
570, 2006 Revision, published June 30, 2006, at 71 FR 37694.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Surety Bond Branch at (202) 874-6850.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A Certificate of Authority as an acceptable 
surety on Federal bonds is hereby issued under 31 U.S.C. 9305 to the 
following company: Beazley Insurance Company, Inc. (NAIC 
<greek-i>37540). Business Address: 20 Stanford Drive, Farmington, 
Connecticut 06032. Phone: (860) 677-3700. Underwriting Limitation b/: 
Surety Licenses c/: AL, AK, AZ, AR, CA, CO, CT, DE, DC, FL, GA, HI, ID, 
IL, IN, IA, KY, ME, MD, MA, MI, MN, MS, MO, MT, NE, NV, NH, NM, NY, NC, 
ND, OH, PA, RI, SD, TX, UT, VT, VA, WA, WV, WI, WY. Incorporated in: 
Connecticut.
    Federal bond-approving officers should annotate their reference 
copies of the Treasury Circular 570 (``Circular''), 2006 Revision, to 
reflect this addition.
    Certificates of Authority expire on June 30th each year, unless 
revoked prior to that date. The Certificates are subject to subsequent 
annual renewal as long as the companies remain qualified (see 31 CFR 
part 223). A list of qualified companies is published annually as of 
July 1 in the Circular, which outlines details as to underwriting 
limitations, ares in which companies are licensed to transact surety 
business, and other information.
    The Circular may be viewed and downloaded through the Internet at 
http://www.fms.treas.gov/c570.
    Questions concerning this Notice may be directed to the U.S. 
Department of the Treasury, Financial Management Service, Financial 
Accounting and Services Division, Surety Bond Branch, 3700 East-West 
Highway, Room 6F01, Hyattsville, MD 20782.

    Dated: November 9, 2006.
Vivian L. Cooper,
Director, Financial Accounting and Services Division, Financial 
Management Service.
[FR Doc. 06-9241 Filed 11-16-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-35-M
#### § 222.24 Records.

Notes taken or factual material shared during mediation sessions shall not be included in the appeal record prepared in accordance with the procedures at 36 CFR part 214.
§ 1182.6 Limits that exist as to the contents of the Institute's systems of records. ( a ) The Institute shall maintain only such information about an individual as is relevant and necessary to accomplish a purpose of the agency required by statute or by executive order of the President. In addition, the Institute shall maintain all records that are used in making determinations about any individual with such accuracy, relevance, timeliness, and completeness as is reasonably necessary to ensure fairness to that individual in the making of any determination about him or her. However, the Institute shall not be required to update retired records.
( b ) The Institute shall not maintain any record about any individual with respect to or describing how such individual exercises rights guaranteed by the First Amendment of the Constitution of the United States, unless expressly authorized by statute or by the subject individual, or unless pertinent to and within the scope of an authorized law enforcement activity.
Case 16-26286 Doc 10 Filed 08/18/16 Entered 08/18/16 09:18:09 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
#### § 1232.1 Purpose.

The purpose of this part is to effectuate section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, which is designed to eliminate discrimination on the basis of handicap in any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 224 (Tuesday, November 21, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 67360]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9314]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Human Genome Research Institute; Notice of Closed 
Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Human Genome Research Institute 
Special Emphasis Panel; Mod ENCODE Subgroup.
    Date: December 6, 2006.
    Time: 9 a.m. to 12 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: The Watergate, 2650 Virginia Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 
20037.
    Contact Person: Rudy O. Pozzatti, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Office of Scientific Review, National Human Genome 
Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 
20892, 301 402-0838.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

    Name of Committee: National Human Genome Research Institute 
Initial Review Group, Genome Research Review Committee, Centers of 
Excellence in Genome Science (CEGS).
    Date: December 12-13, 2006.
    Time: 9 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, 
Conference Room T-1 Level, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Contact Person: Ken D. Nakamura, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Office of Scientific Review, National Human Genome 
Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 
20892, 301 402-0838.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.172, Human 
Genome Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: November 15, 2006.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 06-9314 Filed 11-20-06; 8:45am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
§ 1150.40 Under what circumstances will the Endowment collect amounts that I owe to the Endowment (or some other Federal agency) by offsetting the debt against payments that the Endowment (or some other Federal agency) owes me? ( a ) The regulations in this subpart apply to the collection of any debts you owe to the Endowment, or to any request from another Federal agency that the Endowment collect a debt you owe by offsetting your debt against a payment the Endowment owes you. Administrative offset is authorized under Section 5 of the Federal Claims Collection Act of 1966, as amended (31 U.S.C. 3716). The Endowment shall carry out administrative offset in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Claims Collection Standards; the regulations in this subpart are intended only to supplement the provisions of the Federal Claims Collection Standards.
( b ) The Chairperson, after attempting to collect a debt you owe to the Endowment under Section 3(a) of the Federal Claims Collection Act of 1966, as amended (31 U.S.C. 3711(a)), may collect the debt by administrative offset, subject to the following: ( 1 ) The debt you owe is certain in amount; and
( 2 ) It is in the best interest of the Endowment to collect your debt by administrative offset because of the decreased costs of collection and acceleration in the payment of the debt.
( c ) No collection by administrative offset will be made on any debt that has been outstanding for more than 10 years unless facts material to the Endowment or a federal agency's right to collect the debt were not known, and reasonably could not have been known, by the official or officials responsible for discovering and collecting the debt.
( d ) The regulations in this subpart do not apply to: ( 1 ) A case in which administrative offset of the type of debt involved is explicitly prohibited by statute; or
( 2 ) Debts owed to the Endowment by Federal agencies.
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                        PURSUANT TO 18U.S.C. SECTION 1350


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ace Marketing & Promotions, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2009 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Dean L. Julia, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

                                         /S/ DEAN L. JULIA
                                         -----------------------------------
                                         DEAN L. JULIA
                                         CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                         November 16, 2009