alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Richard D. Falcone, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Qof Tasker Products Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

4. The issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the issuer andhave:

(a) designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the periodin which this report is being prepared;

(b) [Intentionallyomitted in accordance with SEC Release No. 33-8392]

(c) evaluated theeffectiveness of the issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and

(d) disclosed in thisreport any change in the issuer’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the issuer’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and

5. The issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of theissuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

(b) any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.

November 14 , 2006
| /s/ Richard D. Falcone                |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
| Richard Falcone                       |   |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |
| (Principal Executive Officer)         |

 

 

----
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsA Note about Self-Induced Velocity Generated by a Lifting-Line Wing or Rotor BladeThis report presents an elementary analysis of the induced velocity created by a field of vortices that reside in the wake of a rotor blade. Progress achieved by other researchers in the last 70 years is briefly reviewed. The present work is presented in four stages of complexity that carry a lifting-line representation of a fixed wing into a single-blade rotor. The analysis leads to the conclusion that the lifting rotor's spiraling vortex wake structure has very high induced power when compared to the ideal wing. For an advanced ratio of one-half, induced power is on the order of 10 times that of the wing when the comparison is made at wingspan equal to rotor diameter and wing and rotor having equal lift.Document ID20060026344Acquisition SourceAmes Research CenterDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsHarris, Franklin D.*(Maryland Univ. College Park, MD, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 7, 2013Publication DateFebruary 1, 2006Subject CategoryAerodynamicsReport/Patent NumberRept-A-050006NASA/CR-2006-213478Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAG2-1597Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20060026344.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Editorial Note on Part 7
Editorial Note: The Alphabetical Listing is updated annually by the Office of the Federal Register.

§ 7.29 Gateway National Recreation Area. ( a ) *Operation of motor vehicles.* The operation of motor vehicles, other than authorized emergency vehicles, is prohibited outside of established public roads and parking areas, except on beaches and oversand routes designated by the Superintendent by the posting of appropriate signs and identified on maps available at the office of the Superintendent. These beaches and routes will be designated after consideration of the criteria contained in sections 3 and 4 of E.O. 11644, (37 FR 2877) and § 4.10(b) of this chapter.
( b ) *Off-road vehicle operation.* ( 1 ) Operation of motor vehicles, (including the various forms of vehicles used for travel oversand, such as but not limited to, “beach buggies”) on beaches or on designated oversand routes without a permit from the Superintendent is prohibited. Before a permit will be issued, each vehicle will be inspected to assure that it contains the following equipment which must be carried in the vehicle at all times while on the beaches or on the designated oversand routes: ( i ) Shovel;
( ii ) Jack;
( iii ) Tow rope or chain;
( iv ) Board or similar support;
( v ) Low pressure tire gauge. Prior to the issuance of such permits, operators must show compliance with Federal and State regulations and applicable to licensing, registering, inspecting, and insuring of such vehicles. Such permits shall be affixed to the vehicles as instructed at the time of issuance.
( 2 ) Driving off designated, marked oversand routes or beaches is prohibited.
( 3 ) Vehicles shall not be parked in designated oversand routes or interfere with moving traffic.
( 4 ) When the process of freeing a vehicle which has been stuck results in ruts or holes, the ruts or holes shall be filled by the operator of such vehicle before it is removed from that area.
( 5 ) The operation of a motorcycle on an oversand vehicle route or beach is prohibited.
( 6 ) The Superintendent may establish limits on the number of oversand vehicles permitted on designated oversand routes and beaches when such limitations are necessary in the interest of public safety, protection of the ecological and environmental values of the area, coordination with other visitor uses.
( c ) *Public lewdness.* Section 245.00 of the New York Penal Code is hereby adopted and incorporated into the regulations of this part. Section 245.00 provides that:
A person is guilty of public lewdness when he intentionally exposes the private and intimate parts of his body in a lewd manner or commits any other lewd act (a) in a public place, or (b) in private premises under circumstances in which he may readily be observed from either a public place or from other private premises, and with intent that he be so observed.
[41 FR 19220, May 11, 1976, as amended at 44 FR 44157, July 27, 1979; 52 FR 10686, Apr. 2, 1987]
#### § 1172.24 Information requirements.

Each recipient shall keep records containing information necessary for NEH to determine whether the recipient is in compliance with the Act and the regulations in this part, and shall provide any such records to NEH upon request and in the preferred format specified by NEH. Each recipient shall also permit reasonable access by NEH to its books, records, accounts, and other facilities and sources of information, to the extent necessary for NEH to determine whether the recipient is in compliance with the Act and this part.
#### Clara Duval, as Administratrix of the Estate of Alfred Duval, Deceased, Respondent, *v.*Racquette River Paper Company, Appellant.

*Duval*v. *Racquette River Paper Co.,*117 App. Div. 913, affirmed.

(Argued December 18, 1907;

decided January 7, 1908.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered February 11, 1907, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover for the death of plaintiff’s intestate, alleged to have occurred through defendant’s negligence.

*H. B. Lucey*for appellant.

*Ledyard P. Ildle*and *William H. MeCormieh*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Werner. Willard Bartlett and Hiscook, JJ.
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Outlook Group
Corp. ("Outlook Group") for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2002, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Paul M. Drewek, Chief Financial Officer of Outlook Group, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Outlook
Group.



/s/ Paul M. Drewek


Paul M. Drewek
Chief Financial Officer, Outlook Group
August 28, 2002



This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by Outlook Group for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
A ITENTJON: DOCKET SECTION, C-SS 

...JHu;o~r..!.!izo~n"""AJ.:.iri..J,.l;lnLllldll::us"'t~.:;rie:...s~.a. • .u.ln~:::c~------------------'' having its principal 

office at 12521 lntemntionpl Blvd. Seattle 98!88 

hereby designates, pursuant to section 46103 of Title 49 of the U.S. Code (formerly section !OOS(b} of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958, os amended) the person named below as its Agent upon whom service of all 

notices and process, and all orders, decisions, and requirements of the Department of Transportation mny be made for and on behalf of said canicr, hereby canceling all previous designations of agents made by it 

to the DOT. 

NarneofAgent ___________ ~D~avui~d~H~e~ffi~cm~an~-------------------

Address Cozen O'Connor, 1627 [Street, NW, Suite 1100, Washington, DC 20006 

(2021 463-2537 (djrectl: dheffeman@cozen.com (e-maill 

The Agent so designated has written his name and also his initials in the following space: 

Name -:b -.r\cA J-\o{..ft CJM~~ (Initials) -= ..;...... ___ _ 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,._.....&.H£llo~ri!..51w~nl.l...L.:IAo~.~.ir..~l~nd~u~s!!.tn~·e~s.-..~l.unc~~:~

___________ has caused these 

presents to be signed in its name by pgvid Camnbe!!, President & Chief Operating Officer 

of said company, and to be anested under its corporate seal by Shannon Alberts, Corporate Secretary 

#I 

on this/' day of January,~ 

/shannon Alberts 

OST F 10!0.5 (1·95) 

Horizon Air Industries. Inc. 

By: ;..../\ I (/ 1 

David Campbell
§ 800.10 Special requirements for protecting National Historic Landmarks. ( a ) *Statutory requirement.* Section 110(f) of the act requires that the agency official, to the maximum extent possible, undertake such planning and actions as may be necessary to minimize harm to any National Historic Landmark that may be directly and adversely affected by an undertaking. When commenting on such undertakings, the Council shall use the process set forth in §§ 800.6 through 800.7 and give special consideration to protecting National Historic Landmarks as specified in this section.
( b ) *Resolution of adverse effects.* The agency official shall request the Council to participate in any consultation to resolve adverse effects on National Historic Landmarks conducted under § 800.6.
( c ) *Involvement of the Secretary.* The agency official shall notify the Secretary of any consultation involving a National Historic Landmark and invite the Secretary to participate in the consultation where there may be an adverse effect. The Council may request a report from the Secretary under section 213 of the act to assist in the consultation.
( d ) *Report of outcome.* When the Council participates in consultation under this section, it shall report the outcome of the section 106 process, providing its written comments or any memoranda of agreement to which it is a signatory, to the Secretary and the head of the agency responsible for the undertaking.
§ 9.80 Who must apply for an operations permit? ( a ) Except as otherwise provided in §§ 9.70 through 9.73, an operator proposing to conduct operations within the boundary of a System unit must submit an application for an operations permit to the Superintendent.
( b ) An operations permit is subject to cost recovery under 54 U.S.C. 103104.
# CongressionalCandidate Table 7e
§ 1172.2 Application. ( a ) The Act and the regulations in this part apply to each recipient and to any program or activity receiving financial assistance from the NEH.
( b ) The Act does not apply to: ( 1 ) Any age distinction contained in that part of a Federal, State or local statute or ordinance adopted by an elected, general purpose legislative body which: ( i ) Provides any benefits or assistance to persons based on age;
( ii ) Establishes criteria for participation in age-related terms; or
( iii ) Describes intended beneficiaries or target groups in age-related terms.
( 2 ) Any employment practice of any employer, employment agency, labor organization, or with respect to any labor-management joint apprenticeship training program.
( 3 ) The rights or responsibilities of any person or party pursuant to the ADEA, the EEOC regulations under the ADEA, or any statements of policy promulgated by the EEOC under the ADEA.
Date of 

report 

1968 

Sept. 17 

17 

17 

17 

17 

17 

17 

~tuatr nf t4r luitrb ~tatra NINETIETH CONGRESS 

FIRST SESSION {Convened January 10, 1967 

AdJourned December 15, 1967 

SECOND SESSION {Convened January 15, 1968 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Prepared under the direction of FRANCIS R. VALEO, Secretary of the Senate 

By GERALD A. HACKETT, Executive Clerk 

Friday, September 20, 1968 

NOMINATIONS 

Calendar Message Name of nommee I Office 

I 

Predecessor No. No. I 

I 

INTERNATIONAL 

ATOMIC ENERGY 

AGENCY CONFERENCE 

REPRESENTATIVES 

876 321 Glenn T. Seaberg, of The representative of the 

California. United States of America 

to the 12th session of 

the General Conference 

of the International 

Atomic Energy Agency. 

876 321 Wilfrid E . Johnson, of Alternate representative of 

Washington. the United States of 

America to the 12th 

session of the General 

Conference of the International Atomic Energy 

Agency. 

876 321 Verne B. Lewis, of ____ _ do ____ __ __ ____ ______ _ 

Maryl::Lnd. 

876 321 Henry DeWolf Smyth, of __ ___ do _____ ___ ___ _______ _ 

New Jersey. 

876 321 Gerald F. Tape, of ___ __ do ______ ____ ________ _ 

Maryland. 

876 321 J ames T. Ramey, of ____ _ do ___ ___ ____ _______ __ 

Illinois. 

876 321 Herbert Scoville, Jr., of __ ___ d0-------------------1 

Connecticut. 

95-022- 68-No. 193 
2 

-

Date of Calendar Message Name ofnommee Office Predecessor report No No 

----

DISTRICT 01<' COLUMBIA 

COURT OF APPEALS 

1968 

SE-pt. 18 877 290 George R Gallagher, of Associate judge of the A new position 

Maryland. District of Columbia created under 

court of appeals for the Public Law 90-178 

term of 10 year~. approved Dec. 8, 

1967. 

DEPARTMENT OF 

AGRICULTURE 

18 878 317 Ted J. Davis, of Oklahon1a_ An Assistant Secret ary of George L. Mehren, 

Agriculture. re:,igned. 

U.S. CUSTOMS COURT 

18 879 319 Edward D. Re, of New Judge of the U.S. Customs Lindley G. Beckworth, 

York. Court. resigned. 

U 5 GC VERNMENT PRl NT INb OFf i CE 19 68
§ 101.62 Directives. ( a ) A Directive is an official action that requires a person to take or refrain from taking certain actions in accordance with its provisions.
( b ) A person must comply with each Directive issued. However, a person may not use or extend a Directive to obtain any items from a supplier, unless expressly authorized to do so in the Directive.
( c ) A Directive takes precedence over all DX rated orders, DO rated orders, and unrated orders previously or subsequently received, unless a contrary instruction appears in the Directive.
#### Hallock, appellant, v. De Munn *et al.*

*Married women—contracts by.*

In order to maintain an action on the note of a married woman, it must he shown affirmatively that the debt was contracted, either for the purpose of carrying on a separate trade or business, or for the benefit of her separate estate, or for her own benefit on the credit of her separate estate. '

Appeal from a judgment entered upon the report of a referee. The action is upon a promissory note described "as follows :

“ $185

Tboupsbuegh, *May*17, 1870.

“ On or before two years from date, I promise to pay David Oonderman or bearer, one hundred and eighty-five dollars, with use.

(Signed)

“ Diaeea O. De Muee.

*“*Johe F. De Muee.

“ Johe' F. De Muee, *Security.”*

The cause was tried before a referee. The only evidence given at the trial on the part of the plaintiff was the note itself. The only evidence on the part of the defendants was that Dianna O. De Munn was a married woman. The referee found that the said Dianna O. De Munn was, at the time of the giving of said note, a married woman, and had been for many years, and was the wife of the said John F. De Munn, and as a conclusion of law, held and reported that said note was void as to her, and dismissed the complaint.

Judgment was entered accordingly, from which the plaintiff appealed.

*A. J. McCall,*for appellant.

*A. Madden,*for respondent.

*351E. Darwih Smith, J.

The decision, of the referee was clearly right. The notes and contracts of married women are still *prima facie*void at common law *(Ballin*v. *Dillaye,*37 N. Y. 35), and only valid when made, as allowed under the statute of March 20, 1860 (Laws of 1860, chapter 90), entitled "An act concerning the rights and liabilities of husband and wife,” as amended in 1862 (Laws of 1862, chapter 172).

In order to maintain an action on the note, or other contract of a married woman, it must be shown affirmatively that the debt was contracted, either for the purpose of carrying on a separate trade or business, or for the benefit of her separate estate, or for her own benefit, on the credit of her separate estate. This was held in *Kinne*v. *Kinne,*in this department, of the April term, in a brief opinion which I find published in 45 How. 68, following the case of *Yale*v. *Dederer,*18 N. Y. 265; S. C., 22 id. *450; Corn Exchange Ins. Co.*v. *Babcock,*42 id. 614. These essential facts, to entitle the plaintiff to recover as against the defendant, Dianna O. De Munn, were not proved at the trial, and the referee properly dismissed the complaint as against her.

The judgment should be affirmed.

*Judgment affirmed.*
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20463 

October 19,2016 

Jan Witold Baran 

Caleb P. Burns 

Wiley Rein LLP 

1776 K Street, NW 

Washington, DC 20006 

SENT VIA FIRST CLASS AND ELECTRONIC MAIL 

RE: MUR6589R 

American Action Network 

Dear Mr. Baran: 

On October 12,2016, the Federal Election Commission notified you of the reopening of 

this matter involving allegations that your client, American Action Network, violated the Federal 

Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended. 

On October 18,2016, the Commission considered the matter and there was an 

insufficient number of votes to find reason to believe that American Action Network violated 

52 U.S.C. §§ 30102,30103, and 30104. Accordingly, the Conomission closed its file in this 

matter. A Statement of Reasons explaining the basis for the decision is enclosed. 

Documents related to the case will be placed on the public record today. See Statement 

of Policy Regarding Disclosure of Certain Documents in Enforcement and Other Matters, 81 

Fed. Reg. 50,702 (Aug. 2,2016). 

If you have any questions, please contact Peter Reynolds, the attomey assigned to this 

matter at (202) 694-1650. 

Sincerely, 

— 

Kathleen Guith 

Acting Associate General Counsel 

for Enforcement 

Enclosure 

Statement of Reasons
EXHIBIT
32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Salon Media Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the “Report”), I, Christopher Neimeth, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
 
 (2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
  /s/
Christopher Neimeth
 Christopher
Neimeth
 Chief
Executive Officer
§ 261.19 Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness. The following are prohibited in the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness: ( a ) Possessing or transporting any motor or other mechanical device capable of propelling a watercraft through water by any means, except by permit or as specifically authorized by Federal law or regulation.
( b ) Transporting, using, or mooring amphibious craft of any type or any watercraft designed for or used as floating living quarters.
( c ) Using wheels, rollers, or other mechanical devices for the overland transportation of any watercraft, except by special-use authorization, or as authorized by Federal law or regulation.
[42 FR 2957, Jan. 14, 1977; 42 FR 24739, May 16, 1977, as amended at 49 FR 25450, June 21, 1984; 50 FR 16231, Apr. 25, 1985. Redesignated at 70 FR 68291, Nov. 9, 2005]
#### § 1159.19 What restrictions exist regarding the release of mailing lists?

The Endowment may not sell or rent an individual's name and address unless such action is specifically authorized by law. This section shall not be construed to require the withholding of names and addresses otherwise permitted to be made public.