alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Joshua W. Barnum, Respondent, *v.*John T. Williams, Appellant.

*Barnum*v. *Williams,*115 App. Div. 694, affirmed.

(Argued November 25, 1907;

decided December 10, 1907.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered December 1, 1906, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon the report of a referee in an action to recover for work done and materials furnished by plaintiff’s assignee under a contract.

*Pichará T. Greene*for appellant.

*John J. Puhn*and *William N. Pyhman*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gbay, O’Bbien, Yann, Weeneb and Chase, JJ: Not sitting: Willabd Babtlett, J.
§ 1223.22 How must agencies protect vital records? Agencies must take appropriate measures to ensure the survival of the vital records or copies of vital records in case of an emergency. ( a ) *Duplication.* Agencies may choose to duplicate vital records as the primary protection method. Duplication can be to the same medium as the original record or to a different medium. When agencies choose duplication as a protection method, the copy of the vital record stored off-site is normally a duplicate of the original record. The agency may store the original records off-site if their protection is necessary, or if it does not need to keep the original records at its normal place of business.
( b ) *Dispersal.* Once records are duplicated, they must be dispersed to sites a sufficient distance away to avoid being subject to the same emergency. Dispersal sites may be other office locations of the same agency or some other site.
( c ) *Storage considerations.* Copies of emergency operating vital records must be accessible in a very short period of time for use in the event of an emergency. Copies of legal and financial rights records may not be needed as quickly. In deciding where to store vital record copies, agencies must treat records that have the properties of both categories, that is, emergency operating and legal and financial rights records, as emergency operating records. ( 1 ) The off-site copy of legal and financial rights vital records may be stored at an off-site agency location or, in accordance with § 1233.12 of this subchapter, at a records storage facility.
( 2 ) When using a NARA records storage facility for storing vital records that are duplicate copies of original records, the agency must specify on the SF 135, Records Transmittal and Receipt, that they are vital records (duplicate copies) and the medium on which they are maintained. The agency must also periodically cycle (update) them by removing obsolete items and replacing them with the most recent version.
§ 1182.17 Institute systems of records that are covered by exemptions in the Privacy Act. ( a ) Pursuant to and limited by 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2), the Institute system entitled “Office of the Inspector General Investigative Files” shall be exempted from the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a, except for subsections (b); (c)(1) and (2); (e)(4)(A) through (F); (e)(6), (7), (9), (10), and (11); and (i), insofar as that Institute system contains information pertaining to criminal law enforcement investigations.
( b ) Pursuant to and limited by 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2), the Institute system entitled “Office of the Inspector General Investigative Files” shall be exempted from 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3); (d); (e)(1); (e)(4)(G), (H), and (I); and (f), insofar as that Institute system consists of investigatory material compiled for law enforcement purposes, other than material within the scope of the exemption at 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2).
( c ) The Institute system entitled “Office of the Inspector General Investigative Files” is exempt from the provisions of the Privacy Act noted in this section because their application might alert investigation subjects to the existence or scope of investigations; lead to suppression, alteration, fabrication, or destruction of evidence; disclose investigative techniques or procedures; reduce the cooperativeness or safety of witnesses; or otherwise impair investigations.
§ 101.91 Records and reports. ( a ) Persons are required to make and preserve for at least three years, accurate and complete records of any transaction covered by this part or an official action.
( b ) Records must be maintained in sufficient detail to permit the determination, upon examination, of whether each transaction complies with the provisions of this part or any official action. However, this part does not specify any method or system to be used.
( c ) Records required to be maintained by this part must be made available for examination on demand by duly authorized representatives of HHS as provided in § 101.71.
( d ) In addition, persons must develop, maintain, and submit any other records and reports to HHS that may be required for the administration of the DPA and other applicable statutes, and this part.
( e ) DPA section 705(d), as implemented by E.O. 13603, provides that information obtained under this section which the Secretary deems confidential, or with reference to which a request for confidential treatment is made by the person furnishing such information, shall not be published or disclosed unless the Secretary determines that the withholding of this information is contrary to the interest of the national defense. Information required to be submitted to HHS in connection with the enforcement or administration of the DPA, this part, or an official action, is deemed to be confidential under DPA section 705(d) and shall be handled in accordance with applicable Federal law.
Exhibit 31.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer
pursuant to Item 601(b)(31) of Regulation S-K, as adopted pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, Henry Sun, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Highpower International, Inc.; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|Date: April 27, 2012         
|-----------------------------
|                             
|/s/ Henry Sun                
|Henry Sun                    
|Chief Financial Officer      
|(Principal Financial Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 199 (Monday, October 16, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 60781]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-8718]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act, Pub. L. 94-409, that the Securities and 
Exchange Commission will hold the following meeting during the week of 
October 16, 2006:
    An Open Meeting will be held on Wednesday, October 18, 2006 at 10 
a.m. in Room L-002, the Auditorium.
    The subject matter of the Open Meeting scheduled for Wednesday, 
October 18, 2006, will be:

    The Commission will consider whether to adopt amendments to the 
best-price rule for issuer and third-party tender offers under the 
Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The amendments would clarify that 
the best-price rule applies only with respect to the consideration 
offered and paid for securities tendered in a tender offer and 
should not apply to consideration offered and paid according to 
employment compensation, severance or other employee benefit 
arrangements entered into with security holders of the issuer or 
subject company.

    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting items.
    For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have 
been added, deleted or postponed, please contact:
    The Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

    Dated: October 11, 2006.
Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 06-8718 Filed 10-12-06; 10:55 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
##### 



Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002


In connection with the quarterly report of
Park-Ohio Industries, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned
officers of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officers
knowledge:



| |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) The Report fully complies with the
    requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
    Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                                               
|
| | (2) The information contained in the Report
    fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
    condition and results of operations of the Company as of the
    dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.

Dated: November 10, 2004

| |    |                       
| | -- | ----------------------
| | By | /s/ EDWARD F. CRAWFORD

| |                         
| | ------------------------
| |                         
| | Name: Edward F. Crawford

| |        |                                  
| | ------ | ---------------------------------
| | Title: | Chairman, Chief Executive Officer



| |    |                       
| | -- | ----------------------
| | By | /s/ RICHARD P. ELLIOTT

| |                         
| | ------------------------
| |                         
| | Name: Richard P. Elliott

| |        |                                           
| | ------ | ------------------------------------------
| | Title: | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished
solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not
being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
document.

26
#### § 51.19 Must the Director award the concession contract that is set forth in the prospectus?

Except for incorporating into the concession contract appropriate elements of the best proposal, the Director must not award a concession contract which materially amends or does not incorporate the terms and conditions of the concession contract as set forth in the prospectus.
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20463

 

MEMORANDUM

TO: Patricia C. Orrock July 2, 2020 

 Chief Compliance Officer

 Dayna Brown

 Acting Assistant Staff Director

 Audit Division 

FROM: Neven F. Stipanovic 

 Associate General Counsel 

Policy Division 

 Lorenzo Holloway 

 Assistant General Counsel

 Compliance Advice

 Jennifer Waldman

 Attorney

 

SUBJECT: Interim Audit Report on Grassroots Victory Political Action Committee 

(LRA 1106) 

 The Office of the General Counsel has reviewed the proposed Interim Audit Report 

(“IAR”) for the Grassroots Victory Political Action Committee. The IAR contains one finding: 

Misstatement of Financial Activity – Increased Activity. We concur with the finding. If you 

have any questions, please contact Jennifer Waldman, the attorney assigned to this audit.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                           (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ASI Entertainment, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31,
2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"),
Ronald J. Chapman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Philip A. Shiels,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, do each hereby certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section
1350), that to his knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
     the Company.


/s/    Ronald J. Chapman

Ronald J. Chapman
Chief Executive Officer
February 12, 2008


/s/    Philip A. Shiels

Philip A. Shiels
Chief Financial Officer
February 12, 2008

[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to ASI Entertainment, Inc. and will be retained by ASI Entertainment,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.]




</SEC-DOCUMENT>



















<PAGE>
#### Jacob Klein, Respondent, *v.*Martin T. Garvey, Appellant.

(Argued April 11, 1907;

decided April 30, 1907.)

*Klein*v. *Garvey,*112 App. Div. 911, affirmed.

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered April 11, 1906, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained through defendant’s, negligence.

*Carl Schurz Pebrasch*and *Henry 8. Mansfield*for appellant.

*Julius Hilbern Cohn*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., C’Brien, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Yann, Hiscock and Chase, JJ.
. Date of report 

1970 

Sept. 4 

Date of 

report 

1970 

Sept. 15 

.15 

~ruutr nf tqr luitrh itnt:rs 

NINETY.;.FIRST CONGRESS 

F S {Convened January 3, 1969 

IRST ESSION Adjourned December 23, 1969 

S · ·s - ._ {Convened January 19, 1970 ECOND ESSION 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Prepared under the direction of FRANCIS R. V ALEO, Secretary of the Senate 

By GERALD A~ HACKETT, Exerutive Clerk 

Thursday, September 17, 1970 

TREATY 

Calendar Treaty Noc I Subject Action of committee 

No. 

6 Ex. F: (91st Cong., Supplementary Extradition Convention Reported favorably by 

2d sess.) with France. Mr. Fulbright, from 

the Committee ou 

Foreign Relations, 

with a printed report. 

(See Ex. Rept. 91-23.) 

; 

' 

NOMINATIONS 

Calendar Message Name of nominee Ol!lce. Predecessor 

Noc No. 

DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

161 259 -Jolin N. Irwin II, of New Under Secretary of State---

York. 

AMBASSADOR 

162 257 William B. Buffum; of Ambassador Extraordinary 

New York, a Foreign and Plenipotell.tiary of 

Service_ officer of Class 1. the United States of 

America to the Republic 

• of Lebanon. 

48-022--70--No.218 · 
2 

Date of Calendar Message Name of nommee Office Predecessor 

report No. No. 

INTER-AMERICAN 

SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT 

INSTITUTE 

1970 For a term of 2 years: 

Sept. 15 163 250 Jolin A. Hannah, of A member of the Board of New position. 

Mtchigan. Directors of the InterAmerican Social Development Institute for tht' 

trrm mdicatrd. 

For a term of 4 years: 

15 163 250 John Richardson, Jr., of ___ __ do ______ _________ ____ Do. 

Virginia. 

For a term of 6 years: 

Hi 163 250 Augustin S. Hart, Jr., of ___ __ do _________ _____ _____ Do. 

Illlnois. 

J!'i 163 250 George Cabot Lodge, of ____ _ do __ __________ _______ Do. 

Maosachusetts. If) l-6\3 2'i0 Charle"! A Meyer, of _____ do_ ----------------- Do. Pennsylvania. 

[NEW REPORT] 

NATIONAL SCIENCE 

FOUNDATION 

16 lp4 247 Raymond L. Bisplmghoff, Deputy Director of th<' New po ion. 

of Ma"!sachusett">. National Science I 

Foundation. 

NATIONAL LIBRARY 

OF MEDICINE 

16 165 249 James Chipman Fletcher, Member of the Board of Alfred Robert Zipf, of Utah. Regents, National term <'Xpired. 

L1brary of Medicine, 

Public Health Service, 

for a term of 4 year'l 

from Aug. 3, 1970 

16 165 249 John Phillip McGovern, of _____ do ___________ ________ Dr. Kathryn M. 

Texas. Smith, tl'rm rxpired 

OFFICE OF SCIENCE 

AND TECHNOLOGY 

16 166 254 Edward E David, Jr., of Director of the Offic<' of Lre A. DnBridgr. New J ersey. Science and Technology. 

AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT 

16 167 188 Donald G. MacDonald, of An Assistant Administrator Maurice J. Williams. Vermont. of the Agency for International Development. 

U S GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1970
#### § 12.11 Recreational activities.

Engaging in a recreational activity is prohibited.
ArizonaFPV LLC

4717 E. Gatewood Rd. Phoenix Arizona, 85050

February 11, 2016

U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Washington, DC 20590

REF: DOT/FAA Amendment to Current Exemption #12815 Regulatory Docket No. FAA−2015−2603

Dear Sir or Madam:

We at ArizonaFPV LLC are requesting an amendment to our existing granted exemption #12815. 

ArizonaFPV LLC has the need to work with a growing number of popular lightweight (under 55lbs) UAV 

platforms alongside our already currently approved platforms in our exemption. 

The UAS proposed by the petitioner are the DJI Phantom 3, DJI Inspire 1, DJI Matrice, DJI Spreading 

Wings S800, DJI Spreading Wings S1000, 3D Robotics Solo, 3D Robotics Iris+, Parrot Bebop, Zephyr 

2, Walkera Runner 250, Walkera Voyager 3, Walkera Scout X4, Turbo Ace Matrix, Immersion RC 

Vortex, and the Team Black Sheep Gemini.

The FAA has issued grants of exemption in circumstances similar (see Docket No. FAA-2015-

2515).

ArizonaFPV LLC would like to have approval for operations for the purpose of closed-set motion 

picture and television filming and production, the following additional conditions and limitations 

would apply.

1. The operator must have a motion picture and television operations manual (MPTOM) as 

documented in this grant of exemption. 

2. At least 3 days before aerial filming, the operator of the UAS affected by this exemption must 

submit a written Plan of Activities to the local Flight Standards District Office (FSDO) with 

jurisdiction over the area of proposed filming. The 3-day notification may be waived with the 

concurrence of the FSDO. The plan of activities must include at least the following: 

a. Dates and times for all flights; 

b. Name and phone number of the operator for the UAS aerial filming conducted under this grant of 

exemption; 
c. Name and phone number of the person responsible for the on-scene operation of the UAS; 

d. Make, model, and serial or N−Number of UAS to be used; 

e. Name and certificate number of UAS PICs involved in the aerial filming; 

f. A statement that the operator has obtained permission from property owners and/or local officials 

to conduct the filming production event; the list of those who gave permission must be made 

available to the inspector upon request; 

g. Signature of exemption holder or representative; and 

h. A description of the flight activity, including maps or diagrams of any area, city, town, county, 

and/or state over which filming will be conducted and the altitudes essential to accomplish the 

operation. 

3. Flight operations may be conducted closer than 500 feet from participating persons consenting to 

be involved and necessary for the filming production, as specified in the exemption holder’s 

MPTOM. 

Respectfully,

Brian Deatherage

Chief Operations Officer

ArizonaFPV LLC

www.phoenixdronservice.com

brian@arizonafpv.com

Phone: 480-200-0371

4717 E. Gatewood Rd. Phoenix AZ., 85050
#### § 1170.41 Application of this subpart.

Subpart E applies to postsecondary education programs or activities, including postsecondary vocational education programs or activities, that receive Federal financial assistance and to recipients that operate, or that receive Federal financial assistance for the operation of, such programs or activities.

[46 FR 55897, Nov. 12, 1981, as amended at 68 FR 51386, Aug. 26, 2003]
§ 1170.21 Discrimination prohibited. ( a ) *General.* No qualified handicapped person shall, on the basis of handicap, be subjected to discrimination in employment under any program or activity that receives Federal financial assistance.
( b ) A recipient shall make all decisions concerning employment under any program or activity to which this part applies in a manner which ensures that discrimination on the basis of handicap does not occur and may not limit, segregate, or classify applicants or employees in any way that adversely affects their opportunities or status because of handicap.
( c ) A recipient may not participate in a contractual or other relationship that has the effect of subjecting qualified handicapped applicants or employees to discrimination prohibited by this subpart. The relationships referred to in this paragraph include relationships with employment and referral agencies, with labor unions, with organizations providing or administering fringe benefits to employees of the recipient, and with organizations providing training and apprenticeships.
( d ) *Specific activities.* The provisions of this subpart apply to: ( 1 ) Recruitment, advertising, and the processing of applications for employment;
( 2 ) Hiring, upgrading, promotion, award of tenure, demotion, transfer, layoff, termination, right of return from layoff and rehiring;
( 3 ) Rates of pay or any other form of compensation and changes in compensation;
( 4 ) Job assignments, job classifications, organizational structures, position descriptions, lines of progression, and seniority lists;
( 5 ) Leaves of absence, sick leave, or any other leave;
( 6 ) Fringe benefits available by virtue of employment, whether or not administered by the recipient;
( 7 ) Selection and financial support for training, including apprenticeship, professional meetings, conferences, and other related activities, and selection for leaves of absence to pursue training;
( 8 ) Employer sponsored activities, including those that are social or recreational; and
( 9 ) Any other term, condition, or privilege of employment.
( e ) A recipient's obligation to comply with this subpart is not affected by any inconsistent term of any collective bargaining agreement to which it is a party.
[46 FR 55897, Nov. 12, 1981, as amended at 68 FR 51386, Aug. 26, 2003]
# Party Table 5

&"Times New Roman,Bold"&11&KFF0000This table was published on 4/3/15.
#### In the Matter of the Petition of George G. Hastings, as Executor of Rosalie T. Hastings, Deceased, Respondent, for *the*Inspection of the Books and Records of Frank Tousey, Publisher, a Corporation. Sinclair Tousey et al., Appellants.

*Matter of Hastings,*128 App. Div. 516, affirmed.

(Argued January 5, 1909;

decided January 19, 1909.)

' Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered November T, 1908, which reversed an order of Special Term denying a motion for a peremptory writ of mandamus and granted said motion.

*James M. Hunt*for appellants.

*Theron Davis*for respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs ; ,no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., Edward T. Bartlett, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock and Chase, JJ.