alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                          5
<CIK>                                              0001068237
<NAME>                                 SSB Global Diversified Futures Fund L.P.

<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                     JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                       DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                                    86,628,705
<SECURITIES>                                                 513,196
<RECEIVABLES>                                                317,104
<ALLOWANCES>                                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                          87,459,005
<PP&E>                                                             0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                     0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                            87,459,005
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                      2,530,531
<BONDS>                                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                              0
<PREFERRED>                                                        0
<COMMON>                                                           0
<OTHER-SE>                                                84,928,474
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                              87,459,005
<SALES>                                                            0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                          (2,785,882)
<CGS>                                                              0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                      0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                             432,949
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                           (3,218,831)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                    0
<CHANGES>                                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                              (3,218,831)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                     34.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                      0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the annual report of R&R Acquisition VII, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Kirk M. Warshaw, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Dated: September 27, 2011/s/ Kirk M. WarshawKirk M. WarshawChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)





A signed original of this certification has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on October 5, 2006, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), PXI systems Alliance, Inc. has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, TZ Mikroelectronik, Geoppingen, GERMANY; Tabor Electronics, Ltd., Tel Hana, ISRAEL;                           ( print page 67643)                        Spectracom Corporation, Rochester, NY; and PLDA, Inc., Aix-en-Provence, FRANCE have been added as parties to this venture. Also, RACAL Instruments has changed its name to EADS North America Defense Test and Services, Inc., Irvine, CA.                

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and PXI Systems Alliance, Inc. intends to file additional written notification disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On November 22, 2000, PXI Systems Alliance, Inc. filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on March 8, 2001 (66 FR 13971).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on June 23, 2006. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on August 9, 2006 (71 FR 45582).                

Patricia A. Brink,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 06-9339 Filed 11-21-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
### Ungvarsl<y, John From: 

### Sent: To: 

### Cc: 

### Subject: Attachments:

Hello Matt, Taylor, Jonathan@ARB <jonathan.taylor@arb.ca.gov> Friday, July 

### 25, 2014 2:36 PM Lakin, Matt Ungvarsky, John; Karperos, Kurt@ARB; Kalandiyur, Nesamani@ARB; Wade, Dennis@ARB VMT Offset Demonstrations FINAL CORRECTED Sac VMT ·offset Doc for EPA Reformated.docx; FINAL SJV VMT Offset Doc for EPA March 

### 2014 Reformated.docx

I am attaching an updated copy ofthe Sacramento region VMT Offset Demonstration which includes atypographical correction to the 

### 2018 VMT shown in rows 

### 1 and 

### 3 ofthe table on page 

### 6. The incorrect numberof

### 65,439,000 has been replaced with the correct numberof

### 64,709,000. This is strictly atypographical correction, the VMTOffset Demonstration was done using the correct 

### 64,709,000 VMT, therefore there is no change in the emissions levels or demonstration shown in the document. Both the Sacramento and SJV documentswere originally sentto EPA with the phrase "DRAFT CONFIDENTIAL" on the cover pages. We have removed this from the Sacramento document attached, and I am also attaching acopy ofthe SJV documentwith this language removed. Nothingelse has been changed in the SJV document. Please let me know ifyou have any questions. Thanks much to you and yourstaffforyour assistance. Best, Jon Jonathan Taylor, P.E. Chief, Transportation Planning Branch Air Quality Planning and Science Division California Air Resources Board jtaylor@arb.ca.gov Ph. 

### 916-445-8699 FAX: 

### 916-322-3646 CONFIDENTIAL- DELIBERATIVE PROCESS

1
§ 1152.9 How does the Chairman receive and respond to comments? ( a ) The Chairman follows the procedures in § 1152.10 if: ( 1 ) A state office or official is designated to act as a single point of contact between a state process and all Federal agencies; and
( 2 ) That office or official transmits a state process recommendation for a program selected under § 1152.6.
( b ) ( 1 ) The single point of contact is not obligated to transmit comments from state, areawide, regional or local officials and entities where there is no state process recommendation.
( 2 ) If a state process recommendation is transmitted by a single point of contact, all comments from state, areawide, regional, and local officials and entities that differ from it must also be transmitted.
( c ) If a state has not established a process, or is unable to submit a state process recommendation, state, areawide, regional and local officials and entities may submit comments to the Endowment.
( d ) If a program or activity is not selected for a state process, state, areawide, regional and local officials and entities may submit comments to the Endowment. In addition, if a state process recommendation for a nonselected program or activity is transmitted to the Endowment by the single point of contact, the Chairman follows the procedure of § 1152.10 of this part.
( e ) The Chairman considers comments which do not constitute a state process recommendation submitted under these regulations and for which the Chairman is not required to apply the procedures of § 1152.10 of this part, when such comments are provided by a single point of contact or directly to the Endowment by a commenting party.
#### Adam Bernhard, Respondent, *v.*The City of Rochester Appellant.

*Bernhard*v. *City of Rochester,*127 App. Div. 875, affirmed.

(Argued January 18,1909;

decided February 9, 1909.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the . Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered July 30, 1908, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover damages to plaintiff’s premises alleged to have been caused by lowering the grade of a street.

*W.*W. *Webb, Corporation Counsel (Edward Harris, Jr.,*of counsel), for appellant.

*George D. Forsyth*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Hiscook and Chase, JJ.
#### § 144.202 Definitions.

As used in this Subpart—

*Partnership qualified policy* refers to a qualified long-term care insurance policy issued under a qualified State long-term care insurance partnership.

*Qualified long-term care insurance policy* means an insurance policy that has been determined by a State insurance commissioner to meet the requirements of sections 1917(b)(1)(C)(iii)(I) through (IV) and 1917(b)(5) of the Act. It includes a certificate issued under a group insurance contract.

*Qualified State long-term care insurance partnership* means an approved Medicaid State plan amendment that provides for the disregard of any assets or resources in an amount equal to the insurance benefit payments that are made to or on behalf of an individual who is a beneficiary under a long-term care insurance policy that has been determined by a State insurance commissioner to meet the requirements of section 1917(b)(1)(C)(iii) of the Act.
#### W. N. Ford et al., appellants, v. George E. Davis, appellee.

Filed December *4, 1913.*

No. 18,144.

Appeal from the district court for Sheridan county: William H. Westover, Judge.

*Reversed with directions.*

*A. G. Plants*and *M. F. Hwrrmgton,*for appellants.

*Allen G. Fisher, William P. Rooney*and *R. L. Wilhite, contra.*

Reese, C. J.

This is a companion case to that of *Ford v. Thompson, ante,*p. 658, It is submitted on a similar record and upon *663the same briefs and argument. The decision is therefore the same as in that case. The judgment of the district court is reversed, with directions the same as in that case.

Reversed.

Letton, Fawcett and Hamer, JJ., not sitting.
**IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

((((((((((((((((

No. 04-0418

((((((((((((((((

Kaufman County Development District No. 1,

v.

GARY HENRY, ET AL.

((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((

On Petition for Petition for Review

((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((

**ORDER**

1.The motion to abate appeal, filed on August 12, 2004, is granted, and this case is **ABATED** to allow the parties to proceed with settlement negotiations.

2.This case is removed from the Court's active docket until November 18, 2004, by which time the parties must file either a status report or a motion to dismiss.  The parties shall immediately notify this Court about any changes in status in the settlement proceedings.

Done at the City of Austin, this 20th day of August, 2004.

Andrew Weber, Clerk

Supreme Court of Texas

By Nancy J. Vega, Chief Deputy Clerk
# EUR-Lex - 12005SP028 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12005SP028

**Protocol concerning the conditions and arrangements for admission of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania to the European Union - PART FOUR:TEMPORARY PROVISIONS - TITLE III:FINANCIAL PROVISIONS - Article 28 **

*
Official Journal L 157 , 21/06/2005 P. 0038 - 0038 *

Article 28

1. Measures which on the date of accession have been the subject of decisions on assistance under Regulation (EC) No 1267/1999 establishing an Instrument for Structural Policies for Pre‐accession and the implementation of which has not been completed by that date shall be considered to have been approved by the Commission under Council Regulation (EC) No 1164/94 of 16 May 1994 establishing a Cohesion Fund [13]. Amounts which still have to be committed for the purpose of implementing such measures shall be committed under the Regulation relating to the Cohesion Fund in force at the date of accession and allocated to the chapter corresponding to that Regulation under the general budget of the European Union. Unless stated otherwise in paragraphs 2 to 5, the provisions governing the implementation of measures approved pursuant to the latter Regulation shall apply to those measures.

2. Any procurement procedure relating to a measure referred to in paragraph 1 which on the date of accession has already been the subject of an invitation to tender published in the Official Journal of the European Union shall be implemented in accordance with the rules laid down in that invitation to tender. However, the provisions contained in Article 165 of the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities shall not apply. Any procurement procedure relating to a measure referred to in paragraph 1 which has not yet been the subject of an invitation to tender published in the Official Journal of the European Union shall be in keeping with the provisions of the Constitution, with the acts adopted pursuant thereto and with Union policies, including those concerning environmental protection, transport, trans-European networks, competition and the award of public contracts.

3. Payments made by the Commission under a measure referred to in paragraph 1 shall be posted to the earliest open commitment made in the first instance pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1267/1999, and then pursuant to the Regulation relating to the Cohesion Fund then in force.

4. For the measures referred to in paragraph 1, the rules governing the eligibility of expenditure pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1267/1999 shall remain applicable, except in duly justified cases to be decided on by the Commission at the request of the Member State concerned.

5. The Commission may decide, in exceptional and duly justified cases, to authorise specific exemptions from the rules applicable pursuant to the Regulation relating to the Cohesion Fund in force at the date of accession for the measures referred to in paragraph 1.

[13] OJ L 130, 25.5.1994, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by the 2003 Act of Accession (OJ L 236, 23.9.2003, p. 33).

--------------------------------------------------
§ 101.73 Notification of failure to comply. ( a ) At the conclusion of an audit, investigation, or other inquiry, or at any other time, HHS may inform the person in writing of HHS' position regarding that person's non-compliance with the requirements of the DPA and other applicable statutes, this part, or an official action.
( b ) In cases where HHS determines that failure to comply with the provisions of the DPA and other applicable statutes, this part, or an official action was inadvertent, the person may be informed in writing of the particulars involved and the corrective action to be taken. Failure to take corrective action may then be construed as a willful violation of the DPA and other applicable statutes, this part, or an official action.
Exhibit 99.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  Salomon  Smith  Barney  Global
Diversified  Futures Fund L.P. (the  "Partnership")  on Form 10-Q for the period
ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, David J. Vogel, President of Smith Barney Futures
Management LLC, certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Partnership.


/s/ David J.Vogel
David J. Vogel
Smith Barney Futures Management LLC
Chief Executive Officer
August 14, 2002



<PAGE>
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 99

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the quarterly report of Park-Ohio Industries, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each
of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. sec.
1350, as adopted pursuant to sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,
to such officer's knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the
         Report.

Dated: November 13, 2002

                                            By    /s/ EDWARD F. CRAWFORD
                                             -----------------------------------
                                            Name: Edward F. Crawford
                                            Title:  Chairman, Chief Executive
                                                    Officer and President

                                            By    /s/ RICHARD P. ELLIOTT
                                             -----------------------------------
                                            Name: Richard P. Elliott
                                            Title:  Vice President and Chief
                                                    Financial Officer

     The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
sec. 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate
disclosure document.

                                        23
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tasker Products Corp. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007 as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Lanny Dacus, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company as of and for
      the periods presented in the Report.




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




November
      14, 2007




/s/
                Lanny DacusLanny
                DacusChief
                Executive Officer(Principal
                Executive Officer)


1
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 201 (Wednesday, October 18, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 61474]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-8783]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission.

Time and Date: 2 p.m., Wednesday, November 15, 2006.

Place: Federal Trade Commission Building, Room 532, 600 Pennsylvania 
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20580.

Status: Part of this meeting will be open to the public. The rest of 
the meeting will be closed to the public.

Matters to Be Considered:
    Portion Open to the Public:
    (1) Oral Argument in Rambus Incorporated, Docket 9302.
    Portion Closed to the Public:
    (2) Executive Session to follow Oral Argument in Rambus 
Incorporated, Docket 9302.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mitch Katz, Office of Public Affairs: 
(202) 326-2180. Recorded Message: (202) 326-2711.

Donald S. Clark,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 06-8783 Filed 10-16-06; 1:01 pm]
BILLING CODE 6750-01-M