Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 218 / Monday, November 13, 2006 / Notices 66195 

Shenzhen Everbest Machinery, Industry 

Co., Ltd., Room 302, No. 5, Kefa Road, 

Science Industry Park, Shenzhen, 

China. 

ShenZhen Hongda Electronic Co., Ltd., 

East. 6/F, 14 Bagua-4 Road, Futian 

District, Shenzhen, China. 

Shenzhen Victor Hi-Tech Co., Ltd., 3/F, 

Building 412, Bagua 4th Road, Futian 

District, Shenzhen City, Guangdong 

Province, China, 518029. 

Sinometer Instruments Co. Ltd., Ginza 

International Building, 1056, Shennan 

Avenue, Shenzhen, China. 

TechBuys, LLC, 1813 Yeager Avenue, La 

Verne, CA 91750. 

Velleman Inc., 7354 Tower Street, Fort 

Worth, TX 76118. 

(c) The Commission investigative 

attorney, party to this investigation, is 

Anne Goalwin, Esq., Office of Unfair 

Import Investigations, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., 

Room 401–R, Washington, DC 20436; 

and 

(3) For the investigation so instituted, 

the Honorable Charles E. Bullock is 

designated as the presiding 

administrative law judge. 

Responses to the complaint and the 

notice of investigation must be 

submitted by the named respondents in 

accordance with section 210.13 of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 

19 CFR 201.16(d) and 210.13(a), such 

responses will be considered by the 

Commission if received not later than 20 

days after the date of service by the 

Commission of the complaint and the 

notice of investigation. Extensions of 

time for submitting responses to the 

complaint and the notice of 

investigation will not be granted unless 

good cause therefor is shown. 

Failure of a respondent to file a timely 

response to each allegation in the 

complaint and in this notice may be 

deemed to constitute a waiver of the 

right to appear and contest the 

allegations of the complaint and this 

notice, and to authorize the 

administrative law judge and the 

Commission, without further notice to 

the respondent, to find the facts to be as 

alleged in the complaint and this notice 

and to enter an initial determination 

and a final determination containing 

such findings, and may result in the 

issuance of a limited exclusion order or 

cease and desist order or both directed 

against the respondent. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: November 6, 2006. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. E6–19073 Filed 11–9–06; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–556] 

In the Matter of Certain HighBrightness Light Emitting Diodes and 

Products Containing Same; Notice of 

Commission Decision Not To Review 

an Initial Determination Granting 

Complainant’s Motion To Amend the 

Complaint 

AGENCY: International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission has determined not to 

review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) of 

the presiding administrative law judge 

(‘‘ALJ’’) granting complainant’s motion 

to amend the complaint in the abovecaptioned investigation. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Clint Gerdine, Esq., Office of the 

General Counsel, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 

708–5468. Copies of non-confidential 

documents filed in connection with this 

investigation are or will be available for 

inspection during official business 

hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the 

Office of the Secretary, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 500 E 

Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, 

telephone (202) 205–2000. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may also be obtained by accessing its 

Internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. 

The public record for this investigation 

may be viewed on the Commission’s 

electronic docket (EDIS) at http:// 

edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired 

persons are advised that information on 

this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on (202) 205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Commission instituted this investigation 

on December 8, 2005, based on a 

complaint filed by Lumileds Lighting 

U.S., LLC (‘‘Lumileds’’) of San Jose, 

California. 70 FR 73026. The complaint, 

as amended and supplemented, alleges 

violations of section 337 of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 

**1337, in the importation into the 

United States, the sale for importation, 

and the sale within the United States 

after importation of certain highbrightness light emitting diodes 

(‘‘LEDs’’) and products containing same 

by reason of infringement of claims 1 

and 6 of U.S. Patent No. 5,008,718; 

claims 1–3, 8–9, 16, 18, and 23–28 of 

U.S. Patent No. 5,376,580; and claims 

12–16 of U.S. Patent No. 5,502,316. The 

complaint further alleges the existence 

of a domestic industry. The 

Commission’s notice of investigation 

named Epistar Corporation (‘‘Epistar’’) 

of Hsinchu, Taiwan, and United Epitaxy 

Company (‘‘UEC’’) of Hsinchu, Taiwan 

as respondents. 

On April 28, 2006, Lumileds moved 

to amend the complaint to: (1) Remove 

UEC as a named respondent, (2) change 

the complainant’s full name from 

Lumileds Lighting U.S., LLC to Philips 

Lumileds Lighting Company LLC, and 

(3) identify additional Epistar LEDs 

alleged to infringe one or more patentsin-suit. The remaining respondent did 

not oppose the motion. 

On October 23, 2006, the ALJ issued 

the subject ID granting Lumileds’

motion, and further ordering that the 

Notice of Investigation be amended to 

identify the actual parties in the abovecaptioned investigation. No party 

petitioned for review of the ID pursuant 

to 19 CFR 210.43(a), and the 

Commission found no basis for ordering 

a review on its own initiative pursuant 

to 19 CFR 210.44. The Commission has 

determined not to review this ID. 

The authority for the Commission’s 

determination is contained in section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and in 

sections 210.14 and 210.42(c)) of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.14, 210.42(c)). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: November 6, 2006. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. E6–19071 Filed 11–9–06; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree, 

under the Comprehensive 

Environmental Response, 

Compensation, and Liability Act of 

1980, as Amended (‘‘CERCLA’’) 

Pursuant to 29 CFR 50.7, notice is 

hereby given that on October 31, 2006, 

a proposed consent decree in United 

States v. Bill D. Stallings and Stallings 

Salvage, Inc., Civil action No. 

3:05CV247–H, was lodged with the 

United States District Court for the 

Western District of North Carolina. 

This Consent decree will resolve 

claims asserted by the United States in 

a complaint previously filed against 

defendants Bill D. Stallings and 

Stallings Salvage, Inc., for past costs 

incurred by EPA at the Stallings Salvage 

Site in Monroe, North Carolina. A 


cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
66196 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 218 / Monday, November 13, 2006 / Notices 

complaint was filed on May 31, 2005, 

alleging that defendant Bill D. Stallings 

is liable as a past owner of the Site at 

the time of disposal pursuant to 

CERCLA Section 107(a)(2), and that 

defendant Stallings Salvage, Inc. is 

liable as an operator at the Site at the 

time of disposal, also pursuant to 

CERCLA 107(a)(2). 

The Defendants agree to pay to the 

EPA Hazardous Substance Superfund 

the principal sum of $150,000 plus 

accrued interest, to be made in five 

installments. The first payment, in the 

amount of $10,000, is due within 30 

days of entry of the Consent Decree. 

There will be three subsequent annual 

payments of $39,750.00 each, and a 

fourth and final annual payment 

consisting of the remaining principal 

owed, plus accrued interest. The final 

payment should be in roughly the same 

amount as the previous payments, 

depending on the actual interest rates 

each year. The Consent Decree provides 

that the annual payments will be funded 

through an escrow account to be 

established by the Defendants. 

The Department of Justice will receive 

for a period of thirty (30) days from the 

date of this publication comments 

relating to the consent decree. 

Comments should be addressed to the 

Assistant Attorney General, 

Environment and Natural Resources 

Division, P.O. Box 7611, U.S. 

Department of Justice, Washington, DC 

20044–7611, and should refer to United 

States v. Bill D. Stallings and Stallings 

Salvage, Inc., D.J. Ref. #90–11–3–08007/ 

1. 

The consent decree may be examined 

at the Office of the United States 

Attorney for the Western District of 

North Carolina, 227 West Trade St., 

Suite 1650, Charlotte, NC 28202, and at 

U.S. EPA Region 4, Office of Regional 

Counsel, 61 Forsyth Street, Atlanta, GA 

30303. During the public comment 

period, the consent decree may also be 

examined on the following Department 

of Justice Web site: http:// 

www.usdoj.gov/enrd/ 

Consent_Decrees.html. A copy of the 

consent decree may also be obtained by 

mail from the Consent Decree Library, 

P.O. Box 7611, U.S. Department of 

Justice, Washington, DC 20044–7611 or 

by faxing or e-mailing a request to Tonia 

Fleetwood (tonia.fleetwood@usdoj.gov), 

fax no. (202) 514–0097, phone 

confirmation number (202) 514–1547. In 

requesting a copy from the Consent 

Decree Library, please enclose a check 

in the amount of $5.50 (25 cents per 

page reproduction cost) payable to the 

U.S. Treasury. 

Henry Friedman, 

Assistant Section Chief, Environmental 

Enforcement Section, Environment and 

Natural Resources Division. 

[FR Doc. 06–9167 Filed 11–9–06; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–15–M 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Notice of Lodging of Consent Decrees 

Under the Comprehensive 

Environmental Response, 

Compensation, and Liability Act 

The United States Department of 

Justice gives notice that on October 26, 

2006, a proposed consent decree was 

lodged in United States v. Bunge North 

America Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 

2:06–cv–02209–MPM–DGB, in the 

United States District Court for the 

Central District of Illinois. 

The consent decree resolves claims 

against Bunge North America, Inc. and 

its wholly owned subsidiaries Bunge 

North America (East), L.L.C., Bunge 

North America (OPD West), Inc., and 

Bunge Milling, Inc. under Section 113 of 

the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7413. The 

United States’ complaint alleges that at 

some or all of the twelve plants subject 

to the proposed consent decree, one of 

the Defendants violated Clean Air Act 

requirements related to: Part C of Title 

I, 42 U.S.C. 7470–7492, Prevention of 

Significant Deterioration; Title V, 42 

U.S.C. 7661–7661f, Permits; certain New 

Source Performance Standards, 42 

U.S.C. 7411, 40 CFR Part 60; the state 

implementation plans (‘‘SIPs’’) for the 

eight states in which the plants are 

located; and SIP permitting programs for 

construction and operation of new and 

modified stationary sources of air 

pollution. 

The plants subject to the consent 

decree include eleven soybean 

processing plants and one corn dry mill. 

The soybean processing plants are 

located in: Danville, Illinois; Cairo, 

Illinois; Morristown, Indiana; Decatur, 

Indiana; Delphos, Ohio; Marion, Ohio; 

Council Bluffs, Iowa; Emporia, Kansas; 

Destrehan, Louisiana; Marks, 

Mississippi; and Decatur, Alabama. The 

corn dry mill is located in Danville, 

Illinois. All eight states where the plants 

are located have filed motions to 

intervene as plaintiffs in the case and 

are participating in the settlement. 

The proposed consent decree would 

require Defendants to reduce emissions 

of volatile organic compounds from the 

plants by complying with interim limits, 

and setting and complying with final 

limits, on each plant’s solvent loss ratio 

(SLR). Under the terms of the consent 

decree, the final solvent loss ratio for 

each of the eleven soybean plants may 

not exceed 0.2 gallon of solvent lost per 

ton of oilseeds processed (gal/ton) or the 

plant’s existing permit limit, whichever 

is lower, and the final capacityweighted average SLR for the eleven 

soybean plants may not exceed 0.175 

gal/ton. The consent decree would limit 

the SLR ratio for the corn dry mill plant 

to a maximum of 0.70 gal/ton based on 

content of hazardous air pollutants. 

The consent decree would also 

require Defendants to undertake 

specified additional pollution control 

projects at various plants, to reduce 

emissions of sulfur dioxide, nitrogen 

oxides, and particulate matter. 

Defendants would also be required to 

pay a civil penalty of $625,000, which 

would be divided among the federal 

government and the eight states, and to 

spend at least $1.25 million performing 

state supplemental environmental 

projects to achieve additional 

environmental benefits, including at 

least one project in each of the eight 

states. 

The Department of Justice will 

receive, for a period of thirty (30) days 

from the date of this publication, 

comments relating to the consent 

decree. Comments should be addressed 

to the Assistant Attorney General, 

Environment and Natural Resources 

Division, P.O. Box 7611, U.S. 

Department of Justice, Washington, DC 

20044–7611, and should refer to United 

States v. Bunge North America, Inc., 

DOJ Ref. # 90–5–2–1–07950. 

The Consent Decree may be examined 

at the Office of the United States 

Attorney, Central District of Illinois, 201 

South Vine Street, Suite 226, Urbana, 

Illinois 61802, and at the offices of the 

United States Environmental Protection 

Agency in Region 5, 77 W. Jackson 

Blvd., Chicago, Illinois 60604, Region 4, 

61 Forsyth Street, Atlanta, Georgia 

30303, Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue, 

Suite 1200, Dallas, Texas 75202, and 

Region 7, 901 N. 5th Street, Kansas City, 

Kansas 66101. During the public 

comment period, the consent decree 

may also be examined on the following 

Department of Justice Web site: http:// 

www.usdoj.gov/enrd/ 

Consent_Decrees.html. 

A copy of the consent decree may also 

be obtained by mail from the Consent 

Decree Library, P.O. Box 7611, U.S. 

Department of Justice, Washington, DC 

20044–7611, or by faxing or e-mailing a 

request to Tonia Fleetwood. 

tonia.fleetwood@usdoj.gov, Fax No. 

(202) 514–0097, phone confirmation 

number (202) 514–1547. In requesting a 

copy from the Consent Decree library, 


cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES