alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 213 (Friday, November 3, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 64729]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9055]



[[Page 64729]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Environmental Health 
Sciences Special Emphasis Panel, SBIR for Hazmat and Emergency 
Response.
    Date: November 30, 2006.
    Time: 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Hawthorne Suites Hotel, 300 Meredith Drive, Research 
Triangle Park, NC 27713.
    Contact Person: Sally Eckert-Tilotta, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, National Inst. of Environmental Health Sciences, 
Office of Program Operations, Scientific Review Branch, P.O. Box 
12233, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, 919/541-1446, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2b4e48404e595f1a6b45424e435805454243054c445d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0164626a64737530416f686469722f6f68692f666e77">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.115, 
Biometry and Risk Estimation--Health Risks from Environmental 
Exposures; 93.142, NIEHS Hazardous Waste Worker Health and Safety 
Training; 93.143, NIEHS Superfund Hazardous Substances--Basic 
Research and Education; 93.894, Resources and Manpower Development 
in the Environmental Health Sciences; 93.113, Biological Response to 
Environmental Health Hazards; 93.114, Applied Toxicological Research 
and Testing, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: October 30, 2006.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 06-9055 Filed 11-2-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
No. 5213.

#### Myron Castle *v.*The State.

Threats.—The offense defined by Article 813 of the Penal Code is the *“knowingly*sending or delivering of a threatening letter,” etc.; and the appellant in this case was prosecuted under that article. *Held,*that, the information charging that appellant knowingly did threaten to “take the life of Arizona 0. Benton, by sending her a threatening letter,” etc., it does not charge the offense defined by the statute under which the prosecution was had; wherefore the conviction can not stand. It is not knowingly threatening, but knowingly sending or delivering a threatening letter, which constitutes the offense defined in said Article.

Appeal from the County Court of Archer. Tried below before the Hon. Robert Kerr, County Judge.

The opinion states the case. The penalty imposed by the jury was a fine of one hundred dollars.

*F. E.*Dycus, for the appellant.

*W. L. Davidson,*Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Willson, Judge.

This conviction was obtained under a complaint and information which charge that defendant did “ knowingly, unlawfully, feloniously and seriously, threaten to take the life of Arizona C. Benton by sending her a threatening letter through the United States mail, in words and figures as follows, to wit, threatening to kill her the said Arizona 0. Benton, viz;” and then follows the letter referred to, set forth in *haec verba.*

It is apparent from the record that the county attorney and the trial court regarded the prosecution as brought under Article 813 of the Penal Code. In his charge the judge instructed the jury with reference to that Article and the penalty de*287nounced by it, and there can be no doubt, from the record, that the defendant has been tried and convicted under said Article. This being the case, we are of the opinion that the conviction is erroneous because the information is not a good one under said Article 813. It does not allege that the defendant *knowingly*sent or delivered the letter, but that he “knowingly,” etc., did threaten, etc., by sending, etc. It is the *sending or delivering*of. a threatening letter *knowingly*that constitutes this offense —not *knowingly threatening.*A person might *knowingly*write a threatening letter, and such letter might reach the person to whom it was addressed, and yet it might not have been *knowingly sent or delivered*by the writer. In such case the offense denounced by Article 813 would not have been committed. (Tynes v. The State, 17 Texas Ct. App., 123; Willson’s Crim. Forms, No. 527.)

Opinion delivered April 16, 1887.

If this conviction had been had under Article 809 of the Penal Code, we would not, perhaps, disturb it, although the information is not in strict accordance with approved precedents. (Willson’s Forms, No. 525, and note.)

Because the defendant has been convicted of an offense with which he is not charged, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

*Reversed and remanded.*
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS
13
- 14
- 00755
- CR
IGNACIO GUZMAN JR.

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS On Appeal from the 156th District Court of Bee County , Texas Trial Cause No. B
- 14
- 2044
- 0
- CR
- B

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. February 26, 2015
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 36 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. CON. RES. 36

Authorizing the use of Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center 
      for an event to celebrate the birthday of King Kamehameha I.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 8, 2024

    Mr. Schatz (for himself and Ms. Hirono) submitted the following 
       concurrent resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Authorizing the use of Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center 
      for an event to celebrate the birthday of King Kamehameha I.

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF EMANCIPATION HALL FOR EVENT TO CELEBRATE BIRTHDAY OF 
              KING KAMEHAMEHA I.

    (a) Authorization.--Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center 
is authorized to be used on June 16, 2024, for an event to celebrate 
the birthday of King Kamehameha I.
    (b) Preparations.--Physical preparations for the conduct of the 
event described in subsection (a) shall be carried out in accordance 
with such conditions as may be prescribed by the Architect of the 
Capitol.
                                 <all>
```
§ 1301.6 Impasse procedures. ( a ) To facilitate meaningful consultation and collaboration about decisions of the governing body and the policy council, each agency's governing body and policy council jointly must establish written procedures for resolving internal disputes between the governing board and policy council in a timely manner that include impasse procedures. These procedures must: ( 1 ) Demonstrate that the governing body considers proposed decisions from the policy council and that the policy council considers proposed decisions from the governing body;
( 2 ) If there is a disagreement, require the governing body and the policy council to notify the other in writing why it does not accept a decision; and,
( 3 ) Describe a decision-making process and a timeline to resolve disputes and reach decisions that are not arbitrary, capricious, or illegal.
( b ) If the agency's decision-making process does not result in a resolution and an impasse continues, the governing body and policy council must select a mutually agreeable third party mediator and participate in a formal process of mediation that leads to a resolution of the dispute.
( c ) For all programs except American Indian and Alaska Native programs, if no resolution is reached with a mediator, the governing body and policy council must select a mutually agreeable arbitrator whose decision is final.
1

Hunt, JeffFrom: Hunt, Jeff

Sent: Friday, August 23, 2013 2:11 PMTo: AQComments@ecy.wa.govSubject: Comment on proposed rule langage for Chapter 173-476 WACAttachments: draft review_NAAQS update_letter.pdf

Although it is a very minor change, the EPA has determined that the Chapter 173‐476 rule language regarding Ecology’s twenty‐fo

would not be approvable into the SIP in its current form. For a full discussion of the EPA’s review please see the attached August 

Director of the EPA Region 10 Office of Air, Waste, and Toxics to Stu Clark, Ecology Air Quality Program Manager. If you have any 

comment on the Chapter 173‐476 rule language please feel free to contact me. Thank you.

Jeff Hunt

Air Quality Planner

EPA Region 10

Office of Air, Waste and Toxics

(206) 553‐0256
### NUMBER 13
- 09
- 00 209
- CV


## COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI
- EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________ GREGORY A. BEAVERS, ET AL. , Appellants ,

v. SOUTHWESTERN REFINING COMPANY, INC. , Appellee

.

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 347th District Court of Nueces County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________



## MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez, Vela, and Perkes Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam This appeal was abated by this Court on April 23, 2009 , due to the bankruptcy of one of the parties to this appeal. See 11 U.S.C. ' 362; see generally T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 8. The parties have fi led a n agreed motion to dismiss with prejudice all claims asserted by parties against Southwestern Refining Company, Inc. The parties request that this Court2

dismiss with prejudice all claims asserted by the parties against Southwestern Refining Company, Inc. Accordingly, this case is hereby REINSTATED. The Court, having considered the documents on file and the agreed motion to dismiss with prejudice, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See T EX

. R.

A PP

. P . 42.1(a). The agreed motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal of all claims asserted by the parties against Southwestern Refining Company, Inc., is hereby
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE

. In accordance with the agreement of the parties, costs are taxed against the party

incurr ing same. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant."). Having dismissed the appeal at appellant's request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwi th.

PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed the 20th day of October, 2011.
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

____________

No. 22-5336 September Term, 2022

1:19-cv-02336-JEB

Filed On: April 10, 2023

Campaign Legal Center and Catherine

Hinckley Kelley,

Appellees

v.

Federal Election Commission,

Appellant

Hillary for America and Correct the Record,

Appellees

BEFORE: Millett, Wilkins, and Katsas, Circuit Judges

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the motion to dismiss, the opposition thereto, and the

reply, it is

ORDERED that the motion to dismiss be referred to the merits panel to which

this appeal is assigned. The parties are directed to address in their briefs the issues

presented in the motion to dismiss rather than incorporate those arguments by

reference. 

The Clerk is directed to enter a briefing schedule.

Per Curiam

USCA Case #22-5336 Document #1994031 Filed: 04/10/2023 Page 1 of 1
'^mttb ^tntz s (Eaixvt ai J\.ppalg 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CERCUIT 

No. 00-5163 

Federal Election Commission, 

Appellee 

September Term, 2000 

V. 

National Rifle Association of America, et al., 

Appellants 

FOR OlSTffiCT OF Cl-LUMBlAClRCUlil 

m Jy'^29 200) 

CLERK 

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the District of Columbia 

(No. 85cv01018) 

Before: EDWARDS, ChiefJudge, GINSBURG and TATEL, Circuit Judges. 

t>o 

(X3 -n ^ 

CO ^^5"- ^ 

—a "»*:i 

JUDGMEN T 

This cause came on to be heard on the record on appeal from the United States District 

Court for the District of Columbia and was argued by counsel. On consideration thereof, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED, by the Court, that the judgment ofthe District Court 

appealed from in this cause is hereby vacated and the case is remanded with instmctions, in 

accordance with the opinion for the Court filed herein this date. 

Pursuant to iha provlslona ol F«d. R. App.Pi«i.4Ha) 

ATTACHED: ADKndir^ 

.•_ Opinio n 

Order on Costs 

FOR THE COURT: 

Mark J. Langer, Clerk 

Robert A. Bonner 

Deputy Clerk 

Date: June 29, 2001 

Opinion foi the Court filed by Circuit Judge Tatel. 

Concurring opinion filed by Circuit Judge Ginsburg. 
[Case No. 00-5163] 

Lawrence Mark Noble, Esq. 

Federal Election Commission 

(FEC) 

999 E Street, NW 

Washington, DC 20463
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6399

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

DANA AMILE CAPEHART,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District 

Judge. (2:06-cr-00113-RAJ-FBS-1)

Submitted: August 16, 2010 Decided: September 10, 2010

Before NIEMEYER and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dana Amile Capehart, Appellant Pro Se. Sherrie Scott Capotosto, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for 

Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Dana Amile Capehart appeals the district court’s order 

denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 

U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and 

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the 

reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. 

Capehart, No. 2:06-cr-00113-RAJ-FBS-1 (E.D. Va. Feb. 26, 2010). 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Presidential Documents

66825 

Federal Register 

Vol. 71, No. 222 

Friday, November 17, 2006 

Title 3— 

The President 

Proclamation 8083 of November 14, 2006 

America Recycles Day, 2006 

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation 

Good stewardship of the environment is a personal responsibility and an 

important public value, and on America Recycles Day, we highlight the 

many benefits of recycling. By taking steps to reduce waste and re-use 

materials, we can save precious natural resources, enhance the beauty of 

our communities, and add to the health and prosperity of our Nation. 

Our citizens play an important role in protecting our environment, and 

throughout our country, we are recycling, composting, and helping turn 

materials that would otherwise become waste into valuable resources. Recycling helps conserve energy, prevent greenhouse gas emissions and water 

pollutants, and decrease the need for new landfills and incinerators. 

Recognizing the importance of recycling, my Administration is promoting 

cooperative efforts to conserve and maintain our natural resources. The 

Environmental Protection Agency is encouraging businesses, industries, and 

communities to work together to promote recycling through the Resource 

Conservation Challenge (RCC). Partnerships between government agencies, 

businesses, industries, and private organizations help us to improve practices 

of recycling, re-use, and waste reduction. In addition, my Administration 

is working with businesses through the Plug-In To eCycling Campaign to 

collect and re-use computers, cell phones, and other electronics that would 

otherwise become solid or hazardous waste. To further reduce greenhouse 

gas emissions and save energy, the EPA is also partnering with manufacturers, 

utility companies, and construction companies through the Industrial Materials Recycling effort to increase the safe re-use of industrial byproducts. 

Americans are united in the belief that we have an obligation to be good 

stewards of the environment, and America Recycles Day is an opportunity 

to recommit ourselves to wisely managing our natural resources. By promoting responsibility and good citizenship, we can build a brighter future 

for our children and our Nation. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States 

of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution 

and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim November 15, 2006, 

as America Recycles Day. I call upon the people of the United States to 

observe this day with appropriate programs and activities. 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with PROPOSALS6
66826 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 222 / Friday, November 17, 2006 / Presidential Documents 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this fourteenth day 

of November, in the year of our Lord two thousand six, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-first. 

[FR Doc. 06–9282 

Filed 11–16–06; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 3195–01–P 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with PROPOSALS6GWBOLD.EPS</GPH>
§ 148.124 Certification and disclosure of coverage. ( a ) *General rule.* The rules for providing certificates of creditable coverage and demonstrating creditable coverage have been superseded by the prohibition on preexisting condition exclusions. *See* § 147.108 of this subchapter for rules prohibiting the imposition of a preexisting condition exclusion.
( b ) *Applicability.* The provisions of this section apply beginning December 31, 2014.
[79 FR 30341, May 27, 2014]
**EXHIBIT
      23.1**





**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**




We
      have
      issued our reports dated February 27, 2008, accompanying the combined and
      consolidated financial statements and management’s assessment of the
      effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the
      Annual Report of Atlas Energy Resources, LLC on Form 10-K for the year ended
      December 31, 2007. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said
      reports in the Registration Statements of Atlas Energy Resources, LLC on Form
      S-8, effective January 17, 2007, and Form S-3, effective February 20,
      2008.





/s/
      GRANT
      THORNTON LLP





Cleveland,
      Ohio


February
      27, 2008
Exhibit 32.1









CERTIFICATION




The
undersigned, as the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board, and as
the Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of CompuCredit Corporation, certify
that, to the best of their knowledge and belief, the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the period ended March  31, 2009, which accompanies this
certification fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the
periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of CompuCredit Corporation at the dates and
for the periods indicated. The foregoing certifications are made pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350) and shall
not be relied upon for any other purpose.




This
11th
day of May, 2009.




/s/
      DAVID G. HANNADavid
      G. HannaChief
      Executive Officer andChairman
      of the Board/s/
      J.PAUL WHITEHEAD, IIIJ.Paul
      Whitehead, IIIChief
      Financial
Officer




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to CompuCredit Corporation and
will be retained by CompuCredit Corporation and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 520.5 Conformity with signs and emergency directions.

Persons in or on the premises shall comply with official signs of a prohibitory or directory nature and with the directions of authorized individuals.
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 215 (Tuesday, November 7, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 65113]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9114]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting; Deletion of Agenda Item From November 3, 
2006, Open Meeting

November 2, 2006.
    The following item has been deleted from the list of Agenda items 
scheduled for consideration at the Friday, November 3, 2006, Open 
Meeting.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
4            Wireline Competition.........  Title: AT&T Inc. and
                                             BellSouth Corporation
                                             Application for Transfer of
                                             Control (WC Docket No. 06-
                                             74).
                                            Summary: The Commission will
                                             consider a Memorandum
                                             Opinion and Order regarding
                                             the transfer of control
                                             application of AT&T and
                                             BellSouth.
------------------------------------------------------------------------


    Federal Communications Commission.
William F. Canton,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 06-9114 Filed 11-3-06; 10:58 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-M
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MICHAEL ERIC BUCHANAN,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 41 WAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 22nd day of September, 2023, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.