alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

In the Matter of )

Proposed Final Audit Report on the 

Democratic Foundation of Orange 

County

)

)

)

)

A19-23

CERTIFICATION

I, Laura E. Sinram, Acting Secretary and Clerk of the Federal Election 

Commission, do hereby certify that on January 11, 2021, the Commission 

decided by a vote of 6-0 to approve the Proposed Final Audit Report on the 

Democratic Foundation of Orange County, as recommended in the 

Memorandum from the Chief Compliance Officer and the Audit Division dated 

September 30, 2020.

Commissioners Broussard, Cooksey, Dickerson, Trainor, Walther, and 

Weintraub voted affirmatively for the decision.

Attest:

January 22, 2021

Date Laura E. Sinram

Acting Secretary and Clerk of the 

Commission

Laura 

Sinram

Digitally signed by 

Laura Sinram 

Date: 2021.01.22 

15:28:05 -05'00'
#### §§ 1151.13-1151.15 [Reserved]
#### Clinton Snook, Respondent, *v.*Ida L. French, Appellant, Impleaded with Others.

(Submitted April 10, 1907;

decided April 30, 1907.)

*Snook*v. *French,*111 App. Div. 910, affirmed.

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered January 23, 1906, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term in an action to foreclose a mortgage.

*Louis L. Waters*and *Clarence W. Austin*for appellant.

*George H. Sears*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., O’Brien, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Hiscock and Chase, JJ.
FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ABDULLAH AL-KIDD,  No. 06-36059

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No.

v. CV-05-00093-EJL  District of Idaho, JOHN ASHCROFT, Attorney General,

Boise Defendant-Appellant.

ORDER 

On Remand From The United States Supreme Court

Filed August 3, 2011

Before: Harry Pregerson,1 Carlos T. Bea, and

Milan D. Smith, Jr., Circuit Judges.

ORDER

Pursuant to the Opinion of the Supreme Court in Ashcroft

v. al-Kidd, 131 S. Ct. 2074 (2011), the district court’s denial

of Defendant Ashcroft’s motion to dismiss pursuant to Fed. R.

Civ. P. 12(b)(6) is REVERSED, and the matter is

REMANDED for proceedings consistent with the Supreme

Court’s Opinion. 

1

Judge Harry Pregerson was substituted for the late Judge David R.

Thompson. See General Order 3.2(g). 

10043
# CongressionalCandidate Table 6d
Tribal NSR Meeting

Tuesday, May 24, 2011

Meeting Note to the Docket

Discussion Topics

On May 24, 2011, representatives from the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

(Laura McKelvey, Jessica Montanez, Angel McCormack, Toni Colon) participated in a 

outreach conference call to answer questions from the Forest County Potawatomi 

Community on the rule titled: “Review of New Sources and Modifications in Indian 

Country,” commonly known as the “Tribal NSR Rule.” During this meeting the tribal 

representatives, John Clancy, Natalene Cummings, and Dunkin Moss, commented or 

asked various questions related to this action including: 

• Minor NSR Thresholds. Tribal representatives expressed concerns about the 

proposed minor NSR thresholds. They believe these thresholds are very stringent.

• General Permits. Tribal representatives would like general permits to be readily 

available at the time the rule is finalized. They would also prefer these permits if 

the EPA regions are allowed to create region specific or tribal specific general 

permits.

• TIP Approval Timeframe. Tribal representatives inquired about the timeframe it 

might take to get TIP approval under this rule. 

• Differences between Our Rule and the State of Wisconsin Rules. Tribal 

representatives expressed concerns about the differences between this rule and the 

rules that apply in the state where their Tribal lands are located, Wisconsin. 

These representatives believe that we would not be able to level the playing field 

with this state since our rule is more stringent than the rules that apply in 

Wisconsin.

• Exempted Units List. Tribal representatives believe that emergency generators 

should be exempted from the rule’s requirements. 

• Offset Sources in Nonattainment Areas. Tribal representatives expressed concerns 

about the current unavailability of offsets in Indian country.
SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

ONE HUNDRED FIRST CONGRESS

Convened January 3, 1989

FIR ST SESSION {

SECOND SESSION {

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR

Tuesday, February 28, 1989

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF WALTER J.STEWART, 

SECRETARY OF THE SENATE

By Gerald A. Hackett, Executive Clerk
1

NOMINATIONS

Calendar Message Nominee, Office, And Predecessor Reported

No. No. By

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN

SERVICES

* 12 134 Louis W. Sullivan, of Georgia, to be Feb 23, 89 Mr. Bentsen,

Secretary of Health and Human Services. Committee on Finance, 

without printed report

*Signifies nominee's commitment to respond to requests to appear and testify before any duly

constituted committee of the Senate.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

BRUCE PORTER,

1

Petitioner Below,

Appellant,

v.

ROSIE TOWNSEND,

Respondent,

Appellee.

§

§ No. 61, 2022

§ 

§ Court Below—Family Court of

§ the State of Delaware

§ 

§ File No. CN19-04055

§ Petition No. 20-13074

§ 

§ 

§

 Submitted: March 15, 2022

Decided: March 28, 2022

Before SEITZ, Chief Justice; TRAYNOR and MONTGOMERY-REEVES,

Justices.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the notice to show cause and the appellant’s response, 

it appears to the Court that:

(1) On February 25, 2022, the appellant, Bruce Porter, filed a notice of 

appeal from a Family Court order, dated and docketed on December 13, 2021, 

resolving several matters ancillary to the parties’ divorce. A timely notice of appeal 

was due in this Court by January 12, 2022.

2

 The Senior Court Clerk issued a notice 

directing Porter to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed as untimely 

1 The Court previously assigned pseudonyms to the parties under Supreme Court Rule 7(d).

2 Supr. Ct. R. 6(a)(i). 
2

filed. In his response to the notice to show cause, Porter states that he was unable to 

file a timely notice of appeal because he contracted COVID-19 and is in very poor 

health.

(2) Time is a jurisdictional requirement.3 A notice of appeal must be 

received by the Court within the applicable time period in order to be effective.4 An 

appellant’s pro se status does not excuse a failure to comply strictly with the 

jurisdictional requirements.5 Unless an appellant can demonstrate that the failure to 

file a timely notice of appeal is attributable to court-related personnel, an untimely 

appeal cannot be considered.6

(3) Porter does not contend, and the record does not reflect, that his failure 

to file a timely appeal in this case is attributable to court-related personnel. This 

appeal must therefore be dismissed.

7

 

3 Carr v. State, 554 A.2d 778, 779 (Del.1989).

4 Supr. Ct. R. 10(a).

5 Ward v. Taylor, 2019 WL 4784943, at *1 (Del. Sept. 30, 2019); Smith v. State, 47 A.3d 481, 486-

87 (Del. 2012).

6 Ward, 2019 WL 4784943, at *1; Bey v. State, 402 A.2d 362, 363 (Del. 1979).

7

See, e.g., Washington v. Div. of Fam. Servs., 2011 WL 6201770, at *1 (Del. Dec. 13, 2011) 

(dismissing untimely appeal where the appellant said she had been in ill health but had not shown 

that her failure to file a timely notice of appeal was attributable to court-related personnel).
3

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, under Supreme Court 

Rules 29(b), that this appeal is DISMISSED. 

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Tamika R. Montgomery-Reeves

 Justice
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, *v.*Alonzo J. Whiteman, Appellant.

(Argued February 25, 1907;

decided March 12, 1907.)

*People*v. *Whiteman,*116 App, Div. 931, affirmed.

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered December 7, 1906, which affirmed a judgment rendered at a Trial Term upon a verdict convicting the defendant of the crime of grand larceny in the first degree.

*Charles J. Bissell*for appellant.

*John W. By an*and *Franh A. Abbott*for respondent.

Judgment of conviction affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Edward T. Bartlett, TIaight, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Hiscook, JJ.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the annual report of R&R Acquisition IX, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending June 30, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Kirk M. Warshaw, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| |     |                                                                                                                                                      
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | The Report fully complies
 with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
 Act of 1934, as amended; and                  
| |     |                                                                                                                                                      
| | (2) | The information contained
 in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
 condition and result of operations of the Company.

Dated: September 23, 2009

|                               |                
|------------------------------ | ---------------
|/s/                            | Kirk M. Warshaw
|                               |                
|Kirk M. Warshaw               
|Chief Financial Officer       
|(Principal Financial
 Officer)

A signed
original of this certification has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.

---
II 

Calendar No. 250 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 820 

[Report No. 118–112] 

To add the Consumer Product Safety Commission to the list of agencies 

required to be represented on the PFAS interagency working group. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 15, 2023 

Mr. PETERS (for himself, Ms. COLLINS, Ms. LUMMIS, and Mr. WELCH) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

NOVEMBER 27, 2023 

Reported by Mr. PETERS, with an amendment 

[Insert the part printed in italic] 

A BILL 

To add the Consumer Product Safety Commission to the 

list of agencies required to be represented on the PFAS 

interagency working group. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting Consumers 

5 from PFAS Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 820 RS

1 SEC. 2. PFAS INTERAGENCY WORKING GROUP. 

2 Section 332(b) of William M. (Mac) Thornberry Na3 tional Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 (15 

4 U.S.C. 8963(b)) is amended— 

5 (1) in paragraph (19), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the 

6 end; 

7 (2) by redesignating paragraph (20) as para8 graph (21); and 

9 (3) by inserting after paragraph (19), the fol10 lowing: 

11 ‘‘(20) the Consumer Product Safety Commis12 sion; and’’. 

13 SEC. 3. LIMITATION ON NEW FUNDING. 

14 No additional funds are authorized to be appropriated 

15 for the purpose of carrying out this Act (including the 

16 amendments made by this Act). 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB

kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Calendar No. 250 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 820 

[Report No. 118–112] 

A BILL 

To add the Consumer Product Safety Commission 

on the PFAS interagency working group. to the list of agencies required to be represented 

NOVEMBER 27, 2023 

Reported with an amendment 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           5,287                   5,784
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   25,072                  33,240
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                     12,425                  20,855
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               110,524                 191,230
<PP&E>                                          21,890                  22,136
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 180,130                 286,654
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          154,968                  66,254
<BONDS>                                              0                 119,603
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                            28                      28
<OTHER-SE>                                      25,134                 100,769
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   180,130                 286,654
<SALES>                                        280,417                 342,794
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               280,417                 342,794
<CGS>                                          255,948                 275,569
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  255,948                 275,569
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                88,576                  58,634
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (9,353)                 (7,821)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (72,696)                   1,172
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,373                     431
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (77,069)                     741
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                   (923)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (77,069)                   (182)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (2.73)                  (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.73)                  (0.01)


</TABLE>
rnet-ex103_389.htm



 

Exhibit 10.3

first AMENDMENT TO THE
RIGNET, INC. 2019 OMNIBUS INCENTIVE PLAN

THIS FIRST AMENDMENT is made by RigNet, Inc. (the “Sponsor”),

 

WITNESSETH:

WHEREAS, the Sponsor adopted on May 8, 2019, and continues to sponsor and maintain the plan known as the “RigNet, Inc. 2019 Omnibus Incentive Plan” (the “Plan”); and

WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Sponsor (the “Board”) retained the right in Section 16.1 of the Plan to amend the Plan from time to time; and

WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Sponsor approved resolutions on March 11, 2020 to amend the Plan as set forth below;

NOW, THEREFORE, the Sponsor agrees that, effective as set forth below, the Plan is amended as set forth below:


	
1.  
	
Amendment to Sections 4.1(a), (b) and (c) of the Plan.  Sections 4.1(a), (b) and (c) of the Plan are hereby amended and restated in their entirety to read as follows:




(a) The aggregate number of shares of Stock with respect to which Awards may be granted under the Plan is 4,975,000 (the “Authorized Shares”).

(b) The aggregate number of shares of Stock with respect to which ISOs may be granted under the Plan is equal to the Authorized Shares. 

(c) The maximum number of shares of Stock with respect to which ISOs may be granted to an Employee during a Fiscal Year is equal to the Authorized Shares. The maximum number of shares of Stock with respect to which NQSOs may be granted to an Employee during a Fiscal Year is equal to the Authorized Shares. The maximum number of shares of Stock with respect to which SARs may be granted to an Employee during a Fiscal Year is equal to the Authorized Shares. The maximum number of shares of Stock with respect to which Performance Stock Awards may be granted to an Employee during a Fiscal Year is equal to the Authorized Shares. The maximum number of shares of Stock with respect to which Performance Unit Awards payable in shares of Stock may be granted to an Employee during a Fiscal Year is equal to the Authorized Shares. The maximum value of cash with respect to which Performance Unit Awards payable in cash may be granted to an Employee during a Fiscal Year, determined as of the dates of grants of the Performance Unit Awards, is $3,000,000. The maximum amount that may be paid under Annual Cash Incentive Award(s) granted to an Employee during a Fiscal Year is $3,000,000. 

2.Effectiveness.  In accordance with Section 16.1 of the Plan, the effectiveness of this First Amendment to RigNet, Inc. 2019 Omnibus Incentive Plan (this “Amendment”) is subject to the approval of the Sponsor’s stockholders at the Sponsor’s 2020 annual general meeting of stockholders.  For the avoidance of doubt, if stockholder approval is not obtained, this Amendment shall be void and of no force and effect.

 

3.Effect on the Plan.  This Amendment shall not constitute a waiver, amendment or modification of any provision of the Plan not expressly referred to herein.  Except as expressly amended or modified herein, the provisions of the Plan are and shall remain in full force and effect and are hereby ratified and confirmed.
SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

ONE HUNDRED THIRD CONGRESS 

Convened January 5, 1993 

FIRST SESSION { 

SECOND SESSION { 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Tuesday, July 13, 1993 

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF WALTER J. STEWART, 

SECRETARY OF THE SENATE 

By Gerald A. Hackett, Executive Clerk 
Calendar I Treaty 

No. . Doc. No. 

1 

TREATIES 

SubJect Reported 

By 
2 

NOMINATIONS 

Calendar Message Nominee, Office, And Predecessor Reported 

• 

No. No. Bv 

DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

248 295 Daniel K. Tarullo, of Massachusetts, to be Jun 29, 93 Mr. Pell, 

an Assistant Secretary of State, vice Committee on Foreign 

Eugene J. McAllister, resigned. Relations, without printed 

rennrt 

•Signifies nominee's commitment to respond to requests to appear and testify before any duly 

constituted committee of the Senate. 

,,.
```

[House Report 106-925]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

106th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 2d Session                                                     106-925

======================================================================

 
   PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION 110, MAKING 
         FURTHER CONTINUING APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2001

                                _______
                                

  October 2, 2000.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

                                _______
                                

    Mr. Linder, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 604]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 604, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

                  summary of provisions of resolution

    The resolution provides for consideration in the House of 
House Joint Resolution 110, making further continuing 
appropriations for fiscal year 2001. The rule waives all points 
of order against consideration of the joint resolution. The 
rule also provides one hour of debate equally divided and 
controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the 
Committee on Appropriations. Finally, the rule provides one 
motion to recommit.

                                  

```
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 99.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Paul Taylor, the Chief Executive Officer of Trezac Corp. (the "Company"),
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)      the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter
         ended June 30, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
         of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
         U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.



Dated: September 30, 2002



/s/ Paul Taylor
--------------------------------
Name: Paul Taylor
Title: Chief Executive Officer
#### § 1156.1 Purpose.

The purpose of this part is to implement the Age Discrimination Act of 1975 (“Act”), as amended, and as required by the general age discrimination regulations at 45 CFR part 90. The Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended, is designed to prohibit discrimination on the basis of age in programs or activities receiving Federal financial assistance. The Act also permits federally assisted programs or activities, and recipients of Federal funds to continue to use certain age distinctions and factors other than age which meet the requirements of the Act and the regulations in this part.

[63 FR 6876, Feb. 11, 1998, as amended at 68 FR 51385, Aug. 26, 2003]