alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 1201.8 Procedure in the event of an adverse ruling.

If the court or other authority declines to stay the effect of the demand or request in response to a request made pursuant to § 1201.7, or if the court or other authority rules that the demand or request must be complied with irrespective of the Corporation's instructions not to produce the material or disclose the information sought, the Corporation Employee upon whom the demand or request has been made shall, if so directed by the General Counsel, respectfully decline to comply with the demand or request, citing *United States ex rel. Touhy* v. *Ragen,* 340 U.S. 462 (1951), and the regulations in this part.
# PAC Table 8a

&"Arial,Bold"&10&KFF0000This table was generated on 8/31/23
#### § 261.72 Regulations applicable to Region 2, Rocky Mountain Region, as defined in § 200.2. [Reserved]
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 21 (Wednesday, February 1, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 5348]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-917]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Center on Minority Health and Health Disparities; Notice 
of Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of a meeting of 
the National Advisory Council on Minority Health and Health 
Disparities.
    The meeting will be open to the public as indicated below, with 
attendance limited to space available. Individuals who plan to attend 
and need special assistance, such as sign language interpretation or 
other reasonable accommodations, should notify the Contact Person 
listed below in advance of the meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Advisory Council on Minority Health 
and Health Disparities.
    Date: February 21, 2006.
    Closed: 8:30 a.m. to 9:30 a.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Two Democracy Plaza, 6707 
Democracy Boulevard, Suite 800, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Open: 9:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: The agenda will include Opening Remarks, Administrative 
Matters, Director's Report, NCMHD, IC Health Disparities Research 
Report, NCMHD Program Highlights, and other business of the Council.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Two Democracy Plaza, 6707 
Democracy Boulevard, Suite 800, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Contact Person: Donna Brooks, Asst. Director for Administration, 
National Center on Minority Health and Health Disparities, National 
Institutes of Health, 6707 Democracy Blvd., Suite 800, Bethesda, MD 
20892, 301-435-2135, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#27455548484c54436749444a4f4309494e4f09404851"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="bfddcdd0d0d4ccdbffd1dcd2d7db91d1d6d791d8d0c9">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Any interested person may file written comments with the 
committee by forwarding the statement to the Contact Person listed 
on this notice. The statement should include the name, address, 
telephone number and when applicable, the business or professional 
affiliation of the interested person.

    Dated: January 25, 2006.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 06-917 Filed 1-31-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
§ 155.1050 Establishment of Exchange network adequacy standards. ( a ) Except with regard to multi-State plans: ( 1 ) A federally facilitated Exchange must ensure that the provider network of each QHP meets the standards specified in § 156.230 of this subtitle.
( 2 ) State Exchanges and State-based Exchanges on the Federal Platform must ensure that the provider network of each QHP meets applicable standards specified in § 156.230(a)(1)(ii), (a)(1)(iii), and (a)(4) of this sub*chapter.* ( i ) For plan years beginning on or after January 1, 2026, to comply with the requirement under paragraph (a)(2) of this section, State Exchanges and State-based Exchanges on the Federal platform must: ( A ) Establish and impose network adequacy time and distance standards for QHPs that are at least as stringent as standards for QHPs participating on the Federally-facilitated Exchanges under § 156.230(a)(2)(i)(A) of this subchapter;
( B ) Conduct, prior to QHP certification, quantitative network adequacy reviews to evaluate compliance with requirements under § 156.230(a)(1)(ii), (a)(1)(iii), and (a)(2)(i)(A) of this subchapter, while providing QHP certification applicants the flexibilities described under § 156.230(a)(2)(ii) and (a)(3) and (4); and
( C ) Require that all issuers seeking certification of a plan as a QHP submit information to the Exchange reporting whether or not network providers offer telehealth services.
( ii ) For plan years beginning on or after January 1, 2026, HHS may grant an exception to the requirements described under paragraphs (a)(2)(i) of this section to a State Exchange or State-based Exchange on the Federal platform that demonstrates with evidence-based data, in a form and manner specified by HHS, that: ( A ) the Exchange applies and enforces alternate quantitative network adequacy standards that are reasonably calculated to ensure a level of access to providers that is as great as that ensured by the Federal network adequacy standards established for QHPs under § 156.230(a)(1)(iii), (a)(2)(i)(A), and (a)(4) of this subchapter; and
( B ) the Exchange evaluates whether plans comply with applicable network adequacy standards prior to certifying any plan as a QHP.
( b ) The U.S. Office of Personnel Management will ensure compliance with the standards specified in § 156.230 of this subtitle for multi-State plans.
( c ) A QHP issuer in an Exchange may not be prohibited from contracting with any essential community provider designated under § 156.235(c) of this subtitle.
[77 FR 18467, Mar. 27, 2012, as amended at 89 FR 26423, Apr. 15, 2024]
# PAC Table 9a

&"Arial,Bold"&10&KFF0000This table was generated on 8/31/23.
SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

ONE HUNDRED SECOND CONGRESS 

Convened January 3, 1991 FIRST SESSION { 

SECOND SESSION { 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Friday, March 22, 1991 

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF WALTER J. STEWART, 

SECRETARY OF THE SENATE 

By Gerald A. Hackett, Executive Clerk 
1 

TREATIES 

Calendar Treaty Subject Reported 

No. Doc. No. Bv 

1 EX. B., Two Related Protocols to the Convention for Feb 5 91 Reported favorably 

95-1 the Unification of Certain Rules Relating by Mr. Pell, Committee on 

to International Carriage by Air, as Foreign Relations, with a 

Amended (Montreal Aviation Protocols No. 3 resolution of advice and 

and 4). consent to ratification 

with provisos. (Printed 

report--Ex. Rept. 102-1 

together with minority 

views). 

NOMINATIONS 

Calendar Message Nominee, Office, And Predecessor Reported 

No. No. Bv 

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND 

URBAN DEVELOPMENT 

* 27 2 Arthur J. Hill, of Florida, to be an Mar 14, 91 Mr. Riegle, 

Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Committee on Banking, 

Development, vice C. Austin Fitts, Housing, and Urban Affairs, 

resigned. without printed report. 

* 28 60 Jim E. Tarro, of New Mexico, to be an Do. 

Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban 

Development, vice Claire E. Freeman, 

resimed. 

*Signifies nominee's commitment to respond to requests to appear and testify before any duly 

constituted committee of the Senate.
The OIG's investigative program was found to be in compliance with CIGIE standards 

for investigative operations through a peer review by the Securities and Exchange 

Commission OIG. The investigative program accomplished much of the work planned for 

2017, which included responding to hotline complaints, OIG briefings to new employees, 

and oversight of the OIG's hotline service. In FY 2017, six investigations were opened 

and seven were closed. 

The OIG staff was actively involved in several professional working groups during FY 

2018, including the CIGIE Professional Development Committee and Leadership 

Development Subcommittee, the Council of Counsels to Inspectors General, and the 

DATA Act working group. 

Based on the results of the OIG's planning process, as described in the Annual Planning 

and Methodology Strategies section, the OIG's annual work plan is divided into four 

primary categories: 

(1) Audits/Inspections/Reviews; 

(2) Investigative Program; 

(3) Special Projects; and 

( 4) Additional Requirements/Professional Commitments 

The development and continual updating of the OIG's work plan is a critical aspect of 

accomplishing the OIG's objectives to promote economy and efficiency in FEC programs 

and to detect and prevent fraud, waste and abuse. Effective work planning ensures that 

all OIG resources, including audit and investigative resources, are used effectively and 

efficiently. I look forward to another successful year of providing the highest quality 

support a ,d serv · ce to our stakeholqexs-. 

-V~ 

n Thurber 

Deputy Inspector General 

Federal Election Commission 

October 2, 2017 

2
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20463

OFFICE OF THE CHAIR

MEMORANDUM

TO: The Commission

FROM: Shana M. Broussard

Chair

DATE: December 13, 2021

RE: Audit Division Recommendation Memorandum on the Republican Party 

of Minnesota – Federal (A19-09)

In the Audit Division Recommendation Memorandum on the Republican Party of 

Minnesota – Federal (A19-09), I recommend that the Commission approve Findings 1, 2, 

4 and 6, and that Findings 3 and 5 be moved to the “Additional Issues” section of the 

Proposed Final Audit Report, per Directive 70, C.1.C.
###### Editorial Note on Part 679

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 679 appear at 61 FR 56438, Nov. 1, 1996; 62 FR 2047, Jan. 15, 1997; 66 FR 27909, May 21, 2001; 67 FR 79739, Dec. 30, 2002; and 77 FR 6502, Feb. 8, 2012.

#### § 679.30 [Reserved]
II 

Calendar No. 251 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 910 

[Report No. 118–113] 

To amend the Grand Ronde Reservation Act, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 22, 2023 

Mr. MERKLEY (for himself and Mr. WYDEN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs 

NOVEMBER 27, 2023 

Reported by Mr. SCHATZ, without amendment 

A BILL 

To amend the Grand Ronde Reservation Act, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. GRAND RONDE RESERVATION ACT AMEND4 MENTS. 

5 Section 1(d) of Public Law 100–425 (commonly 

6 known as the ‘‘Grand Ronde Reservation Act’’) (102 Stat. 

7 1594; 108 Stat. 4566) is amended— 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 910 RS

1 (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘lands within 

2 the State of Oregon’’ and inserting ‘‘the 84 acres 

3 known as the Thompson Strip’’; 

4 (2) by redesignating paragraph (2) as para5 graph (3); and 

6 (3) by inserting after paragraph (1) the fol7 lowing: 

8 ‘‘(2) GAMING PROHIBITION.—Any real property 

9 obtained by the Tribes as part of a land claim settle10 ment approved by the United States, including any 

11 real property purchased with funds granted as part 

12 of any land claim settlement, shall not be eligible, or 

13 used, for any class II gaming or class III gaming 

14 under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (25 U.S.C. 

15 2701 et seq.) (as those terms are defined in section 

16 4 of that Act (25 U.S.C. 2703)).’’. 

17 SEC. 2. TREATY RIGHTS OF FEDERALLY RECOGNIZED 

18 TRIBES. 

19 Nothing in this Act, or an amendment made by this 

20 Act, shall be construed to enlarge, confirm, adjudicate, af21 fect, or modify any treaty right of an Indian Tribe (as 

22 defined in section 4 of the Indian Self-Determination and 

23 Education Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 5304)). 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB

kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Calendar No. 251 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 910 

[Report No. 118–113] 

A BILL 

To amend the Grand Ronde Reservation Act, and 

N

for other purposes. 

OVEMBER 27, 2023 

Reported without amendment 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
~ruatr nf tqr luitr~ ~talrs NINETIETH CONGRESS 

FIRST SESSION-Began January 10, 1967 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Prepared under the di1'ection of FRANCIS R. VALEO, Secretary of ~he Senate 

By GERALD A. HACKETT, Executive Clerk 

Wednesday, August 2, 1967 

UNANIMOUS-CONSENT AGREEMENT 

Ordered, That at 1 o'clock p. m. on Wednesday, Aug. 2, 1967, t he Senate proceed to vote on Ex. H, 90th 

Cong, 1st sess., a partial revi~lOn of the Rad10 Regulations (Geneva, 1959), with an additwnal protocol. 

(July 31, 1967) 

TREATY 

Date of Ca.Jendar Treaty No. Subject Action of committee report No. 

1967 

July 27 19 Ex. H, 90th Cong., A partial revision of the Radio Regulations Reported favorably by 

1st sess. (Geneva, 1959), with an additional pro- Mr. Fulbn ght1 from 

tocol. the Comm1ttee on Foreigu Relatrons, with a 

printed report. (See 

Ex. Rept. No. 12, 90th 

Cong., 1st sess.) 

NOMINATIONS 

Date of Ca.Jendar Message Name of nominee Office Predecessor report No. No. 

--- NATIONAL SCIENCE 

BOARD 

1967 

July 31 953 276 Dr. Roger W. Heyns, of A member of the N atwnal 

Cahforma. Science Board, National 

Science Foundation, for 

the remainder of the 

term expiring May 10, 

1970. 

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT 

OPPORTUNITY 

COMMISSION 

31 954 267 Chfford L. Alexander, Jr., A member of the Equal Stephen Shulman. 

of New York. Employment Opportumty Commission for the 

term expiring July I, 

1972. 

85- 022-67- No. 73 U S GOVERNM ENT PRINTI NG FF ~ 1967
§ 1324.405 Accepting reports. ( a ) The State entity shall establish standardized policies and procedures for receiving reports of adult maltreatment and self-neglect 24 hours per day, 7 calendar days per week, using multiple methods of reporting, including at least one online method, to ensure accessibility.
( b ) The State entity shall establish standardized policies and procedures for APS to accept reports of alleged adult maltreatment and self-neglect by mandated reporters as defined in § 1324.401 that: ( 1 ) Share with the mandated reporter who made such report to APS whether a case has been opened as a result of the report at the request of the mandated reporter; and
( 2 ) Obtain the consent of the adult to share such information prior to its release.
( c ) The State entity shall comply with all applicable State and Federal confidentiality laws and establish and adhere to standardized policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of adults, reporters, and information provided in a report.
#### In the Matter of the Accounting of Charles Wanninger et al., as Executors of William Nelson, Deceased, Appellants. Roland S. Palmer, as Guardian of Helen D. Nelson, an Infant, Respondent.

*Matter of Wanninger,*120 App. Div. 273, affirmed.

(Argued November 19, 1907;

decided December 3, 1907.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered June 21, 1907, which affirmed a decree of the New York County Surrogate’s Court judicially settling the accounts of the executors of William Nelson, deceased.

*Alfred A. Cook, Leopold Wallach*and *Charles II. Alien*for appellants.

*John M. Perry*and *Boland 8. Palmer*for respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs to be paid by the appellants personally; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ.
§ 1329.13 Allotment of Federal funds for State independent living (IL) services. ( a ) The allotment of Federal funds for State IL services for each State is computed in accordance with the requirements of section 711(a)(1) of the Act.
( b ) Notwithstanding paragraph (a) of this section, the allotment of Federal funds for Guam, American Samoa, the United States Virgin Islands, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands is computed in accordance with section 711(a)(2) of the Act.
( c ) The Administrator shall reserve between 1.8 percent and 2 percent of appropriated funds to provide, either directly or through grants, contracts, or cooperative agreements, training and technical assistance to SILCs. Training and technical assistance funds shall be administered in accordance with section 711A of the Act.
#### § 1167.6 Office of Inspector General employees.

Notwithstanding the requirements set forth in §§ 1167.1 through 1167.5, when an employee of the agency's Office of the Inspector General receives a demand or request to provide testimony or produce official records and information, the Inspector General or his or her designee shall be responsible for performing the functions assigned to the General Counsel under this part with respect to such demand or request.
EXHIBIT 31.8



Certification of Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to

Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a)
and 15d-14(a)

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002



I, Tim Fitzpatrick, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 3 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Umami Sustainable
Seafood Inc. for the year ended June 30, 2011; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: November 13, 2012



| | By: | /s/ Tim Fitzpatrick     | 
| | --- | ----------------------- | 
| |     | Tim Fitzpatrick         | 
| |     | Chief Financial Officer |
§ 1256.36 When can I appeal decisions about access to donated historical materials? ( a ) If you wish to appeal a denial of access from the director or his designated representative in implementing the provisions of a donor's deed of gift, you may write a letter addressed to the Deputy Archivist of the United States, National Archives and Records Administration, 8601 Adelphi Road, College Park, MD 20740-6001. The Deputy Archivist, the Assistant Archivist for Presidential Libraries, and the Assistant Archivist for Records Services—Washington, DC, or their designated representatives, compose the Board of Review for appeals relating to donated historical materials.
( b ) The board's decision is final. If the board cannot make a determination on your request within 30 working days of receipt, NARA informs you of the reason for the delay. If the board determines that a document should remain closed, you may not file a new appeal for two years. Similarly, you may not file an appeal on documents in collections that have been open for research for less than 2 years.
( c ) In some cases, the donor or his representative may reserve the right to determine whether the donor's materials, a series, or a document or portions of it should remain closed; you cannot appeal such decisions.
( d ) For information on filing appeals for requests made under mandatory review of White House originated information, see § 1260.62 of this chapter.
#### § 222.74 National Advisory Board.

The Chief, Forest Service, shall appoint a representative to attend meetings of the National Advisory Board for Wild Free-Roaming Horses and Burros and to function as prescribed by the Memorandum of Agreement between the Department of the Interior and the Department of Agriculture and the Joint Charter issued by the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of Agriculture. Policies and guidelines relative to proposals for the establishment of ranges, adjustments in number, relocation and disposal of animals, and other matters relating generally to the protection, management, and control of wild free-roaming horses and burros shall be presented to the National Advisory Board for recommendations.
WEATHERFORD CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION

FTIR

FOIA EXEMPT
§ 152.28 Preventing insurer dumping. ( a ) *General rule.* If it is determined based on the procedures and criteria set forth in paragraph (b) of this section that a health insurance issuer or group health plan has discouraged an individual from remaining enrolled in coverage offered by such issuer or health plan based on the individual's health status, if the individual subsequently enrolls in a PCIP under this part, the issuer or health plan will be responsible for any medical expenses incurred by the PCIP with respect to the individual.
( b ) *Procedures and criteria for a determination of dumping.* A PCIP shall establish procedures to identify and report to HHS instances in which health insurance issuers or employer-based group health plans are discouraging high-risk individuals from remaining enrolled in their current coverage in instances in which such individuals subsequently are eligible to enroll in the qualified high risk pool. Such procedures shall include methods to identify the following circumstances, either through the PCIP enrollment application form or other vehicles: ( 1 ) Situations where an enrollee or potential enrollee had prior coverage obtained through a group health plan or issuer, and the individual was provided financial consideration or other rewards for disenrolling from their coverage, or disincentives for remaining enrolled.
( 2 ) Situations where enrollees or potential enrollees had prior coverage obtained directly from an issuer or a group health plan and either of the following occurred: ( i ) The premium for the prior coverage was increased to an amount that exceeded the premium required by the PCIP (adjusted based on the age factors applied to the prior coverage), and this increase was not otherwise explained;
( ii ) The health plan, issuer or employer otherwise provided money or other financial consideration to disenroll from coverage, or disincentive to remain enrolled in such coverage. Such considerations include payment of the PCIP premium for an enrollee or potential enrollee.
( c ) *Remedies.* If the Secretary determines, based on the criteria in paragraph (b) of this section, that the rule in paragraph (a) of this section applies, an issuer or a group health plan will be billed for the medical expenses incurred by the PCIP. The issuer or group health plan also will be referred to appropriate Federal and State authorities for other enforcement actions that may be warranted based on the behavior at issue.
( d ) *Other.* Nothing in this section may be construed as constituting exclusive remedies for violations of this section or as preventing States from applying or enforcing this section or other provisions of law with respect to health insurance issuers.