alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         261,036
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  305,599
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               566,635
<PP&E>                                      13,704,820
<DEPRECIATION>                             (8,546,245)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,725,210
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           26,333
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,725,210
<SALES>                                        438,023
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               440,677
<CGS>                                           54,333
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   54,333
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               315,487
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 70,857
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             70,857
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    70,857
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### § 1208.151 Program accessibility: New construction and alterations.

Each building or part of a building that is constructed or altered by, on behalf of, or for the use of the agency shall be designed, constructed, or altered so as to be readily accessible to and usable by individuals with handicaps. The definitions, requirements, and standards of the Architectural Barriers Act (42 U.S.C. 4151-4157), as established in 41 CFR 101-19.600 to 101-19.607, apply to buildings covered by this section.
September 24, 2020 

Jonathan Fonseca, Lead Auditor 

Federal Election Commission 

Washington, DC 20463 

Doug DeRose, Treasurer 

NTMA Committee for a Strong Economy 

ID #C00043091 

1357 Rockside Road 

Cleveland, OH 44134 

RE: FEC Interim Audit Report Response 

Dear Mr. Fonseca, 

We have no further response to the Interim Audit Report. 

Thank you and best regards, 

Doug DeRose, Treasurer 

NTMA Committee for a Strong Economy
#### § 12.2 Scope.

This part is applicable to surplus real property located within any State which is appropriate for assignment to, or which has been assigned to, the Department for transfer for public health purposes, as provided for in section 203(k) of the Act.
BILLING CODE: 6715-01-M 

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE: 

WEDNESDAY, JUNE 8, 2022 AT 10:00 A.M.

PLACE:

HYBRID MEETING: 1050 FIRST STREET, N.E. WASHINGTON, D.C. (12TH FLOOR) 

AND VIRTUAL. 

NOTE: FOR THOSE ATTENDING THE MEETING IN PERSON, CURRENT COVID-19 

SAFETY PROTOCOLS FOR VISITORS, WHICH ARE BASED ON THE CDC COVID-19 

COMMUNITY LEVEL IN WASHINGTON, D.C., WILL BE UPDATED ON THE 

COMMISSION’S CONTACT PAGE BY THE MONDAY BEFORE THE MEETING. SEE 

THE CONTACT PAGE AT https://www.fec.gov/contact/. IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO 

VIRTUALLY ACCESS THE MEETING, SEE THE INSTRUCTIONS BELOW.

STATUS:

THIS MEETING WILL BE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC, SUBJECT TO THE ABOVEREFERENCED GUIDANCE REGARDING THE COVID-19 COMMUNITY LEVEL AND 

CORRESPONDING HEALTH AND SAFETY PROCEDURES. TO ACCESS THE 

MEETING VIRTUALLY, GO TO THE COMMISSION’S WEBSITE www.fec.gov AND 

CLICK ON THE BANNER TO BE TAKEN TO THE MEETING PAGE.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Interim Final Rule: Independent Expenditure Reporting

Initial Determination on Eligibility to Receive Primary Election Public 

Funds – Howie Hawkins, Howie Hawkins 2020 (LRA 1132)

Draft Advisory Opinion 2022-05: DSCC

Draft Advisory Opinion 2022-03: Democracy Engine, LLC

Draft Advisory Opinion 2022-04: Jill Stein for President Committee

Proposed Final Audit Report on Mike Braun for Indiana (A19-02)

Management and Administrative Matters

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Judith Ingram, Press Officer

Telephone: (202) 694-1220

Authority: Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b

Individuals who plan to attend in person and who require special assistance, such as 

sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should contact Laura 

E. Sinram, Acting Secretary and Clerk, at (202) 694-1040, at least 72 hours prior to the

meeting date.
Signed: _____________________________________

Laura E. Sinram

Acting Secretary and Clerk of the Commission

Submitted: May 31, 2022
§ 1167.5 Procedure when demand is made. ( a ) Whenever an employee is served with a demand to testify in his or her official capacity, or to produce official records and information, the employee shall notify the General Counsel immediately.
( b ) The General Counsel shall review the demand and, in accordance with the provisions of § 1167.4, shall determine whether, or on what conditions, to authorize the employee to testify and/or produce official records and information.
( c ) If a demand requires a response before the General Counsel has made the determination referred to in paragraph (b) of this section, the General Counsel shall provide the court or other competent authority with a copy of this part, inform the court or other competent authority that the demand is being reviewed, and seek a stay of the demand pending a final determination.
( d ) If a court or other competent authority orders that an NEH employee comply with a demand notwithstanding a final decision by the General Counsel to the contrary, or at any other stage in the process, the General Counsel shall advise the employee on how to respond to such order and may arrange for legal representation of the employee.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 998 

To require the Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Communications and 

Information to audit Federal spectrum. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 28, 2023 

Mr. LEE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To require the Assistant Secretary of Commerce for 

Communications and Information to audit Federal spectrum. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FEDERAL SPECTRUM AUDIT. 

4 (a) DEFINITIONS.—In this section— 

5 (1) the term ‘‘Assistant Secretary’’ means the 

6 Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Communica7 tions and Information; and 

8 (2) the term ‘‘Federal entity’’ has the meaning 

9 given the term in section 113(l) of the National 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 998 IS

1 Telecommunications and Information Administration 

2 Organization Act (47 U.S.C. 923(l)). 

3 (b) AUDIT AND REPORT.—Not later than 18 months 

4 after the date of enactment of this Act, the Assistant Sec5 retary, in consultation with the head of each Federal enti6 ty, shall— 

7 (1) conduct an audit of the electromagnetic 

8 spectrum that is assigned or otherwise allocated to 

9 each Federal entity as of the date of the audit; and 

10 (2) submit to Congress, and make available to 

11 each Member of Congress upon request, a report 

12 containing the results of the audit conducted under 

13 paragraph (1). 

14 (c) CONTENTS OF REPORT.—The Assistant Sec15 retary shall include in the report submitted under sub16 section (b)(2), with respect to the electromagnetic spec17 trum that is assigned or otherwise allocated to a Federal 

18 entity as of the date of the audit— 

19 (1) each particular band of spectrum being used 

20 by the Federal entity; 

21 (2) a description of each purpose for which a 

22 particular band described in paragraph (1) is being 

23 used, and how much of the band is being used for 

24 that purpose; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 998 IS

1 (3) the State or other geographic area in which 

2 a particular band described in paragraph (1) is as3 signed or allocated for use; 

4 (4) whether a particular band described in 

5 paragraph (1) is used exclusively by the Federal en6 tity or shared with another Federal entity or a non7 Federal entity; and 

8 (5) any portion of the spectrum that is not 

9 being used by the Federal entity. 

10 (d) FORM OF REPORT.—The report required under 

11 subsection (b)(2) shall be submitted in unclassified form 

12 but may include a classified annex. 

13 (e) RELATION TO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPOR14 TATION SPECTRUM AUDIT.—The Assistant Secretary 

15 shall coordinate with the Secretary of Transportation to 

16 ensure that the audit conducted under this section does 

17 not duplicate the audit conducted under section 27003 of 

18 the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (Public Law 

19 117–58; 135 Stat. 884). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
fM-2.01D-0700

Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?

Organization Person Contacted Date Response

TCCA Gordanka 5111110 Concurs

Jeremic

Bombardier Ruxandra 5111110 Left email

Pooescu

RAA David Lotterer 5111/10 Concurs

.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-1678

OMAR SALEM HELABI,

Petitioner,

versus

U.S. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE;

JOHN ASHCROFT, Attorney General,

Respondents.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals. (A72-563-431)

Submitted: November 9, 2001 Decided: November 20, 2001

Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kenneth F. Liberstein, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Robert D.

McCallum, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, David V. Bernal, Assistant Director, Nelda C. Reyna, Office of Immigration Litigation,

Civil Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington,

D.C., for Respondents.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Omar Salem Helabi, a native and citizen of Yemen, petitions

this court for review of a final order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals denying his application for asylum. After a through review

of the record, we find that substantial evidence supports the

Board’s conclusion that Helabi did not qualify for asylum because

he was “firmly resettled” in Saudi Arabia prior to coming to the

United States. See § 8 C.F.R. 208.14(a)(2) (2001); Mussie v. INS,

172 F.3d 329, 331-32 (4th Cir. 1999). Accordingly, the petition

for review is denied.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

ONE HUNDRED SECOND CONGRESS 

Convened January 3, 1991 

FIRST SESSION { 

SECOND SESSION { 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Wednesday, June 19, 1991 

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF WALTER J. STEWART, 

SECRETARY OF THE SENATE 

By Gerald A. Hackett, Executive Clerk 
1 

TREATIES 

Calendar Treaty Subject Reported 

No. Doc. No. Bv 

1 EX. B., Two Related Protocols to the Convention for Feb 5 91 Reported favorably 95-1 the Unification of Certain Rules Relating by Mr. Pell, Committee on 

to International Carriage by Air, as Foreign Relations, with a 

Amended (Montreal Aviation Protocols No. 3 resolution of advice and 

and 4). consent to ratification 

with provisos. (Printed 

report--Ex. Rept. 102-1 

together with minority 

views). 

NOMINATIONS 

Calendar Message Nominee, Office, And Predecessor Reported 

No. No. Bv 

DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

* 80 139 David Floyd Lambertson, of Kansas, a Career May 7, 91 Mr. Pell, 

Member of the Senior Foreign Service, Committee on Foreign 

Class of Minister-counselor, to be Relations, without printed 

Ambassador Extraordinary and report. 

Plenipotentiary of the United States of 

America to the Kine:dom of Thailand. .. *S1gntf1es nominee's commitment to respond to requests to appear and testify before any duly 

constituted committee of the Senate.
#### Jake Wielinga, appellee, v. Beatrice Creamery Company, appellant.

Filed February 27, 1914.

No. 17,563.

Appeal: Affirmance. On appeal the judgment below will be affirmed, where appellant’s brief does not comply with the court’s rules, and no error in the proceedings or judgment of the trial court is assigned or pointed -out in the brief of appellant, and no plain error appears in the record.

Appeal from the district court for Lancaster county: P. James Cosgrave, Judge.

*Affirmed.*

*Talbot é Allen,-*for appellant.

*George A. Adams, contra.*

Rose, J.

This is a controversy over a lot 100 feet long and 33 feet wide in the village of Holland. Plaintiff pleads ownership and right of possession. Under a lease from an adverse claimant, defendant asserts the right to use a Wilding on the lot for a milk station. Plaintiff recovered judgment, and defendant has appealed.

In the brief of appellant no effort has been made to comply with the statutory provision that “the brief of appellant shall set out particularly each error asserted.” Code, sec. 675c. The court’s rules relating to assignments of error are also ignored. The record does not disclose a plain error within the meaning of the enactment that the supreme court may consider such an error, though not specified in appellant’s brief. Code, sec. 675c. The name of the judge before whom the cause was tried in the court below is also omitted from appellant’s brief. It follows that the judgment below is

Affirmed.
# PAC Table 11d

&"Arial,Bold"&10&KFF0000This table was generated on 8/25/20.
Original,

No. 5333.

#### Harold Amero *v.*Parker L. Hancock, *Warden of the State Prison.*

Filed January 19 and February 24, 1965.

Decided March 31, 1965.

*Harold Amero*(by brief), pro se.

Wheeler, J.

The petitioner contends that his civil rights “were denied and violated” under the Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States in that he did not have a fair trial by an impartial jury and that his counsel “did not provide a full and proper defense as guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. ...”

The substance of his complaint is that one of the jurors who was drawn to sit on his case in Strafford County Superior Court was not an impartial juror and he was thus denied a fair and impartial trial.

In support of this contention the petitioner alleges that this juror had known him for over twenty years and that he (Amero) was at one time “a close companion of his two (2) sons . . .”; that “he disapproved of petitioner and that he, personally did not want his sons to associate with petitioner herein.” The petition further alleges that he “had on occasions had intimate relations” with a former daughter-in-law of this juror, and that such relations could possibly be “a material factor in a divorce decree” between her and a son of the juror.

Because of activities and incidents which the petitioner says were known to Juror Wallingford, Sr. he argues “that it is not presumptuous to assume that when the Jury retired to deliberate; *Juror*Wallingford used all his powers of persuasion to *228give the other Jurors a prejudiced and biased opinion of the petitioner... . .”

At his trial in the court below the petitioner was represented by competent counsel. It is now contended that he brought to his counsel’s attention during the impaneling of the jury that *this*juror knew a great deal about his past life and background and was likely to be prejudiced. He represents that his counsel said he had exhausted his challenges. We have no reason to assume that counsel did not exercise his challenges both peremptory and for cause in the best interest of the petitioner. Furthermore, it must be assumed that the Trial Court in impaneling the jury followed the required statutory and universal practice of the Superior Court in this jurisdiction of propounding certain inquiries to the panel to ascertain if they were impartial and indifferent. RSA 500:32; RSA 606:1.

The petitioner’s exceptions taken during the trial in Superior Court which resulted in his conviction for the crime of breaking, entering and larceny in the nighttime have been considered by this court and were overruled and the conviction affirmed. *State*v. *Amero,*106 N. H. 134. In considering the petitioner’s allegations now before us we have again reviewed the trial record and find no basis in fact for the contention that he did not have a fair trial by an impartial jury.

The order therefore is

*Petition dismissed.*

All concurred.
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 213 (Friday, November 3, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 64746]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9066]



[[Page 64746]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

MILLENNIUM CHALLENGE CORPORATION

[MCC FR 06-18]


Sunshine Act Meeting (Revised); Notice of the November 8, 2006 
Millennium Challenge Corporation Board of Directors Meeting

AGENCY: Millennium Challenge Corporation.

TIME AND DATE: 10 a.m. to 12 p.m., Wednesday, November 8, 2006.

PLACE: Department of State, 2201 C Street, NW., Washington, DC 20520.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Information on the meeting may be 
obtained from Suzi M. Morris via e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#286a47495a4c68454b4b064f475e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="296b46485b4d69444a4a074e465f">[email protected]</span></a> or by 
telephone at (202) 521-3600.

STATUS: Meeting will be closed to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The Board of Directors (the ``Board'') of the 
Millennium Challenge Corporation (``MCC'') will hold a meeting to 
consider the selection of countries that will be eligible for FY 2007 
Millennium Challenge Account (``MCA'') assistance under Section 607 of 
the Millennium Challenge Act of 2003 (the ``Act''), codified at 22 
U.S.C. 7706, and Threshold Program assistance under Section 616 of the 
Act, codified at 22 U.S.C. 7715; discuss the proposed Compact with El 
Salvador; discuss other Compact and Threshold Program-related matters, 
and certain administrative matters. The agenda items are expected to 
involve the consideration of classified information and the meeting 
will be closed to the public.

    Dated: October 31, 2006.
William Geoff Anderson, Jr.,
Vice President and General Counsel (Acting), Millennium Challenge 
Corporation.
[FR Doc. 06-9066 Filed 10-31-06; 4:57 pm]
BILLING CODE 9210-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

ONE HUNDRED SIXTH CONGRESS 

FIRST SESSION { CONVENEDJAN'UARY6, 1999 

SECOND SESSION { 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Monday, June 21, 1999 

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF GARY SISCO, 

SECRETARY OF THE SENATE 

By Michelle Haynes, Executive Clerk 
- CALENDAR 

No. 

EX.RES 

No. 

1 

RESOLUTIONS 

SUBJECT 

REPORTED 

BY 
2 

TREATIES 

CALENDAR TREATY REPORTED 

No. Doc. No. SUBJECT BY 

-------··-----··-----·---
3 

NOMINATIONS 

CALENDAR MESSAGE REPORTED 

No. No. NOMINEE, OFFICE, AND PREDECESSOR BY 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

* 15 22 Gary S. Guzy, of the District of Columbia, to be Mar 17, 99 Reported by Mr. 

an Assistant Administrator of the Chafee, Committee on 

Environmental Protection Agency, vice Environment and Public Works, 

Jonathan Z. Cannon, resigned. without printed report. 

DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

~ 35 3-8 Diane Edith Watson, of California, to be Apr 14, 99 Reported by Mr. Helms, 

Ambassador Extraordinary and Committee on Foreign Relations, 

Plenipotentiary of the United States of without printed report. 

America to the Federal States of Micronesia. 

DEPARTMENTOFLABOR 

* 59 1-5 Kenneth M. Bresnahan, of Virginia, to be Chief Apr 30, 99 Reported by Mr. 

Financial Officer, Department of Labor, vice Jeffords, Committee on Health, 

Edmundo A. Gonzales, resigned. Education, Labor, and Pensions, 

without printed report. 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

* 70 4-4 Carolyn L. Huntoon, ofVirginia, to be an Mar 25, 99 Reported by Mr. 

As8istant Secretary of Energy (Environmental Murkowski, Committee on 

Managem('ntl, vice Alan L. Aim, resigned. Energy and Natural Resources, 

without printed report. 

May 10,99 Senate Committee on 

Armed Services discharged. 

EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT 

* 71 108 Georgt• T. Frampton, Jr., of the District of May 12, 99 Reported by Mr. 

Columbia, to be a Member of the Council on Chafee, Committee on 

Environmental Quality, vice Kathleen A. Environment and Public Works, 

McGinty, resigned. without printed report. 

* 75 18 .John T. Spotila, of New Jersey, to be May 20, 99 Reported by Mr. 

Administrator of the Office of Information and Thompson, Committee on 

Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Governmental Mfairs, without 

Budget, vice Sally Katzen. printed report. 

*Signifies nominee's commitment to respond to requests to appear and testify before any duly constituted committee of the Senate 
4 

NOMINATIONS PLACED ON THE SECRETARY'S DESK
Case 1:19-cv-02336-JEB   Document 22   Filed 11/21/19   Page 1 of 2

Case 1:19-cv-02336-JEB   Document 22   Filed 11/21/19   Page 2 of 2
§ 907.15 Approval of private development proposals. ( a ) Each development proposal submitted by a private developer to the Corporation for its approval, unless categorically excluded, shall require, at a minimum, an environmental assessment.
( b ) The Board of Directors may not take any approval action on a submitted development proposal of a private developer until such time as the appropriate environmental review has been prepared and submitted to the Board of Directors.
( c ) At a minimum, and as part of any submission made by a private developer to the Board of Directors for its approval, a private developer shall make available data and materials concerning the development proposal sufficient to permit the Corporation to carry out its responsibilities on environmental review. When requested, the developer shall provide additional information that the Corporation believes is necessary to permit it to satisfy its environmental review functions.
( d ) As part of a development proposal submission, a private developer may submit an environmental assessment on its development proposal.
( e ) Where the responsible Corporation official determines that the preparation of an EIS is required, the EIS shall be prepared in accordance with part 1502 of the CEQ Regulations. The responsible Corporation official may set time limits for environmental review appropriate to each development proposal, consistent with CEQ Regulations 40 CFR 1601.8 and 1506.10.
( f ) The responsible Corporation official shall at the earliest possible time ensure that the Corporation commences its environmental review on a proposed development project and shall provide to a private developer any policies or information deemed appropriate in order to permit effective and timely review by the Corporation of a development proposal once it is submitted to the Board of Directors for approval. The official shall designate, for the benefit of the developer, staff members of the Corporation to advise the developer with regard to information that may be required in order to accomplish the Corporation's environmental review.