alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit      32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. §1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| DATE:                August 14, 2008 | /s/                Steven van der Velden                           |
|--------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                 | Steven                van der Velden                               |
|                                 | President                andChief                Executive Officer |

*A      signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been      provided to Elephant Talk Communications, Inc. and will be retained by Elephant      Talk Communications, Inc and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission      or its staff upon request.*

----
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7330

LLOYD GEORGE MAXWELL, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Beckley. David A. Faber, District Judge. (CA-98-580-5) Submitted: February 11, 1999 Decided: February 24, 1999 Before ERVIN, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lloyd George Maxwell, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Lloyd George Maxwell appeals the district court’s order dismissing his action seeking return of property under Fed. R. Crim. P. 41(e). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant Maxwell’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis, but affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Maxwell , No. CA-98-580-5 (S.D.W. Va. Aug. 7, 1998). We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

Adult EducationBilingual Education ProgramsCambodianEnglish (Second Language)ImmigrantsKoreanLanguage MinoritiesLanguage ResearchLimited English SpeakingLiteracy EducationNative Language InstructionNative SpeakersRefugeesSecond Language InstructionSecond Language LearningSpanishTeaching Methods

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
Exhibit
10.1


 


Loan
Agreement


 


Party
A (Lender): Shenzhen Wangjv Trading Ltd.


Legal
representative: Weng Yipeng


Address:
Jingji Binhe, Xiasha Village, No. 9289 Binhe Road, Xiasha Community, Shatou Street, Futian District, Shenzhen


 


Party
B (Borrower): Guangchengji (Shanghai) Industrial Co., Ltd.


Legal
representative: Pan Weicheng


Unified
Social Credit Code:


 


Based
on the principles of equality, voluntariness, honesty and credibility, both parties reached the following agreement through friendly
negotiation:


 


1.
Party A agrees to lend to Party B cash up to but not greater than RMB 2,000,000 (Two million Yuan) with its own fund, or fund
from its shareholders, partners or others. The actual loan amount is the cash transferred. 


 


2.
Purpose of the loan: For Party B's daily operations and expansion of business.


 


3.
Loan period: The loan period is 12 months, from June 15, 2020 to June 14, 2021. If the loan is paid in installments, the date
of the last loan should be received no later than December 31, 2020.


 


4.
Loan interest: The loan interest is an annual interest rate of 8%, calculated based on the actual amount received. If the loan
is received in installments, the interest shall be calculated based on the actual date when Party B receives the loan. Interest
shall be paid every six months. If party B cannot remit payment on time due to special circumstances both parties can agree another
payment time.


 


5.
Party A or a third party appointed by Party A should deposit the loan to the following bank appointed by Party B:


Account
name: Guangchengji (Shanghai) Industrial Co., Ltd.


Account
number:


Bank:
Bank of China Shanghai Pudong Avenue Sub-branch


 


6.
Representations and Warranties:


 


6.1
Party B must use the loan legally in accordance with the purposes specified in this agreement, and must not use it for other purposes,
or use the loan for illegal activities.


 


6.2
the purpose of the loan is to for Party B’s daily operations and expansion of business.


 


7.
Settlement of Contract disputes


 


7.1
Disputes arising during the implementation of this Agreement shall be settled through friendly negotiation between the parties,
or mediated by the arbitration institution appointed by both parties. If negotiation or mediation fails, a lawsuit may be filed
in the people's court where Party A is located or Beijing Peoples’ Court or Hong Kong District court.


 


8.
This agreement will become effective after being signed or stamped by both parties. This contract has two copies, with each party
holding one copy. The text of the contract has the same legal effect.


 


Party
A: Shenzhen Wangjv Trading Ltd.


Seal
of Shenzhen Wangjv Trading Ltd.


Date
of signing: June 15, 2020


  


Party
B: Guangchengji (Shanghai) Industrial Co., Ltd.


Seal
of Guangchengji (Shanghai) Industrial Co., Ltd.


Date
of signing: June 15, 2020
§ 810.3 Action on requests. ( a ) Once a requested record has been identified, the Administrative Officer shall notify the requester of a date and location where the records may be examined or of the fact that copies are available. The notification shall also advise the requester of any applicable fees under § 810.5.
( b ) A reply denying a request shall be in writing, signed by the Administrative Officer and shall include: ( 1 ) Reference to the specific exemption under the Act which authorizes the denial of the record, a brief explanation of how the exemption applies to the record requested, and a brief statement of why a discretionary release is not appropriate; and,
( 2 ) A statement that the denial may be appealed under § 810.4 within 30 days by writing to the Executive Director, Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, 1522 K Street NW., Washington, DC 20005.
( c ) The requirements of § 810.3 (b)(1) and (2) do not apply to requests denied on the ground that they are not described with reasonable specificity and consequently cannot be identified.
( d ) Within 10 working days from receipt of a request, the Administrative Officer shall determine whether to grant or deny the request and shall promptly notify the requester of the decision. In certain unusual circumstances specified below, the time for determinations on requests may be extended up to a total of 10 additional working days. The requester shall be notified in writing of any extension and of the reason for it, as well as of the data on which a determination will be made. Unusual circumstances include: ( 1 ) The need to search for and collect records from field offices or other establishments that are separate from the Washington office of the Council;
( 2 ) The need to search for, collect, and examine a voluminous amount of material which is sought in a request; or,
( 3 ) The need for consultation with another agency having substantial interest in the subject matter of the request.
If no determination has been made by the end of the 10-day period or the end of the last extension, the requester may deem his request denied and may exercise a right of appeal in accordance with § 810.4.
#### § 1233.3 What programs of the Agency are subject to these regulations?

The Director publishes in the Federal Register a list of the Agency's programs that are subject to these regulations.
Date of 

report 

1967 

Mar. 21 

22 

22 

22 

22 

22 

22 

22 

22 

~ruatr nf tijr lftuttr~ ~tutrs NINETIETH CONGRESS 

FIRST SESSION-Began January 10, 1967 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Prepared under the direction of FRANCIS R. VALEO, Secretary of the Senate 

By GERALD A. HACKETT, Executive Clerk 

Thursday, March 23, 1967 

NOMINATIONS 

Calendar Message Name of nommee Office :Predecessor 

No No 

OFFICE OF ECONOMIC 

OPPORTUNITY 

105 101 Genevieve Blatt, of Penn- An Assistant Director of New position. 

sylvania. the Office of Economic 

Opportunity. 

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

COURT OF GENERAL 

SESSIONS 

108 39 Fred L. Mcintyre, of An associate Judge of the 

Maryland. District of Columb1a 

court of general sessions 

for the term of 10 years 

to fill a new position 

created by Public Law 

89-598, approved Sept. 

21, 1966. 

109 38 Milton D. Korman, of the _____ do ___________________ 

District of Columbia. 

u.s. COAST GUARD 

The following-named 

officers of the Coast Guard 

for promotion to the grade 

indicated: 

110 71 Paul E. G. Prins __________ Rear admiraL_ -----------

110 71 BenJamin F. EngeL------- _____ do ___________________ 

110 71 James W. Williams ________ _____ do ___________________ 

110 71 Edward C. Allen, Jr _______ _____ do ___________________ 

110 71 Arthur B. EngeL _________ _____ do ________________ ___ 

110 71 Thomas R. Sargent IlL ___ _____ do ___________________ 

65-022--67--No 27 U S GOVERNMENT PRINT!Nt; Of'FICE IU7
58836 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 193 / Thursday, October 5, 2006 / Notices 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Office of the Secretary 

[Transmittal No. 06–52] 

36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification 

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense 

Security Cooperation Agency. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is 

publishing the unclassified text of a 

section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. 

This is published to fulfill the 

requirements of section 155 of Public 

Law 104–164 dated 21 July 1996. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

J. Hurd, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 604–

6575. 

The following is a copy of a letter to 

the Speaker of the House of 

Representatives, Transmittal 06–52 with 

attached transmittal and policy 

justification. 

Dated: September 28, 2006. 

C.R. Choate, 

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison 

Officer, Department of Defense. 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–M 

mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 193 / Thursday, October 5, 2006 / Notices 58837 


mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with NOTICESEN05OC06.031</GPH>
58838 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 193 / Thursday, October 5, 2006 / Notices 


mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with NOTICESEN05OC06.032</GPH>
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 193 / Thursday, October 5, 2006 / Notices 58839 


mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with NOTICESEN05OC06.033</GPH>
58840 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 193 / Thursday, October 5, 2006 / Notices 

[FR Doc. 06–8508 Filed 10–4–06; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–C 


mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with NOTICESEN05OC06.034</GPH>
Argued June 27,

decided July 5, 1911.

#### GUSTIN *v.*GUSTIN.

[116 Pac. 1072.]

Divorce — Custody op Child.

As between plaintiff, a divorced wife, and the husband's stepmother, the former is entitled to custody of her minor child, though the latter is better able pecuniarily to care for the child; plaintiff being a fit person to have custody.

From Clackamas: James U. Campbell, Judge.

Statement by Mr. Chief Justice Eakin.

This is a supplemental proceeding in a suit wherein plaintiff was divorced from defendant. The custody of the child, Vivian Ethel Gustin, was given to defendant’s stepmother, Mrs. M. (N.) L. Gustin, until the further order of the court.

In this proceeding Mrs. *N.*L. Gustin asks *to*have the decree modified to give her the custody of the child permanently, that she may adopt it, and plaintiff appears by motion and also asks the court for an order giving her the custody of the child. The motions were heard together, and an order made, giving the care and control of the child to Mrs. N. L. Gustin, from which order plaintiff appeals.

Reversed : Decree Rendered.

For appellant there was a brief over the names of *Mr. L. W. Humphreys*and *Mr. F. F. Fitzgerald,*with an oral argument by *Mr. Humphreys.*

There was a brief and an oral argument by *Mr. Thomas F. Ryan,*Attorney for Mrs. N. L. Gustin.

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Eakin.

Upon the authority of *Barnes*v. *Long,*54 Or. 548 (104 Pac. 296: 25 L. R. A. [N. S.] 172), this case must be reversed, and the custody of the child awarded to plaintiff. The defendant in the divorce suit, although present and a witness at the hearing on these motions, made no claim to the child. The controversy is between plaintiff and Mrs. N. L. Gustin.

*227There is no contention that plaintiff is an unfit person to have the custody of the child. Mrs. N. L. Gustin calims to be better able, financially, to care for her. The facts bring this case within the principle announced in *Barnes*v. *Long,*54 Or. 548 (104 Pac. 296: 25 L. R. A. [N. S.] 172). As said in *Ex parte Clarke,*82 Neb. 626, 631 (118 N. W. 472, 474: annotated in 20 L. R. A. [N. S.] 171), the courts will not deprive a parent of the custody of a child merely because, on financial or other grounds, a stranger might better provide. “The statute does not make the judges the guardians of all the children in the state, with power to take them from their parents, so long as the latter discharge their duties to the best of their ability, and give them to strangers because such strangers may be better able to provide what is already provided.”

The decree is reversed, and one will be entered here awarding the custody of the child to the plaintiff.

Reversed: Decree Rendered.
#### Charles C. Curry, Appellant, *v.*The Prudential Insurance Company of America, Respondent.

(Argued May 2, 1907;

decided May 21, 1907.)

*Curry*v. *Prudential Ins. Co. of America,*112 App. Div. 913, appeal dismissed.

Ap-peal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered April 20, 1906, which affirmed an order of the court at a Trial Term, setting aside a verdict in favor of plaintiff which had been directed by the court and granting a motion for a new trial in an action to recover commissions alleged to have been earned by plaintiff as agent for the defendant.

*Bichard T. Greene*for appellant.

*William, Ogden Campbell*for respondent.

Appeal dismissed, with costs ; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ.
§ 1600.21 General provisions. ( a ) *Purpose and scope.* This subpart contains the rules that the Morris K. Udall Scholarship and Excellence in National Environmental Policy Foundation (the “Foundation”) follows under the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a. These rules should be read together with the Privacy Act, which provides additional information about records maintained on individuals. The rules in this subpart apply to all records in systems of records maintained by the Foundation that are retrieved by an individual's name or personal identifier. They describe the procedures by which individuals may request access to records about themselves, request amendment or correction of those records, and request an accounting of disclosures of those records by the Foundation. In addition, the Foundation processes all Privacy Act requests for access to records under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552, following the rules contained in subpart A of this part, which gives requests the benefit of both statutes.
( b ) *Applicability.* This subpart applies to all Foundation programs, including the U.S. Institute for Environmental Conflict Resolution (USIECR).
( c ) *Definitions.* As used in this subpart: ( 1 ) *Request for access to a record means a request* made under Privacy Act subsection (d)(1).
( 2 ) *Request for amendment or correction of a record* means a request made under Privacy Act subsection (d)(2).
( 3 ) *Request for an accounting* means a request made under Privacy Act subsection (c)(3).
( 4 ) *Requester* means an individual who makes a request for access, a request for amendment or correction, or a request for an accounting under the Privacy Act.
<PAGE>

                                 Exhibit 10.41
<PAGE>

             ALCO STANDARD CORPORATION DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN

                               AMENDMENT 1996-1
                               ----------------


     Pursuant to Section 19 of the Alco Standard Corporation Deferred
Compensation Plan, Alco Standard Corporation, the sponsor of the Plan, hereby
adopts this Amendment 1996-1 to the Plan, effective as of January 1, 1997.

     1.   Section 2(d) of the Plan is hereby amended by adding thereto a new
last sentence, to read as follows:

     On and after January 1, 1997, Unisource Worldwide, Inc. shall be deemed to
     be an Affiliated Employer solely for purposes of determining vesting and
     when a Participant becomes entitled to receive benefits under the Plan.

     2.   In all other respects, the Plan shall remain unchanged by this
amendment.


                                   ALCO STANDARD CORPORATION

                                   By:________________________________
# Sheet1

&"Arial,Bold"&10&KFF0000This table was generated on 5/19/20.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> SWEDISH KRONA
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998             SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                 .12723                  .12723
<CASH>                                               0                   2,934
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                  48,783
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                  35,012
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                 104,411
<PP&E>                                               0                   8,989
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0                 210,020
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0                  37,786
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                   7,997
<OTHER-SE>                                           0                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0                 210,020
<SALES>                                         28,874                 128,060
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                28,874                 128,060
<CGS>                                           13,141                  59,820
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,128                  33,105
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 115                     374
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,502                  34,896
<INCOME-TAX>                                        42                     252
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,460                  34,644
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .80                    4.29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .41                    2.22
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit
32.2
  ELEPHANT TALK COMMUNICATIONS,
INC.
  CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
  SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Elephant Talk Communications, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Mark
Nije, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to my knowledge:
  (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
  /s/
      Mark NijeMark
      NijeChief
      Financial Officer
                    
                    August
      14, 2009
# PAC Table 7a

&"Arial,Bold"&10&KFF0000This table was generated on 9/12/23.
Total U.S. Exports to  Mauritius

Data in Thousand Dollars 

Data For  JUN. 1999

|Group                  | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | Year to Date 6/1998 | Year to Date 6/1999 | % Change | Year Ending 6/1998 | Year Ending 6/1999 | % Change | % Share
|---------------------- | ---- | ---- | ---- | ---- | ------------------- | ------------------- | -------- | ------------------ | ------------------ | -------- | -------
|TEXTILES & APPAREL     | 1292 | 523  | 364  | 212  | 101                 | 174                 | 72.07    | 248                | 285                | 15.02    | 0      
|TEXTILE MILL PRODUCTS  | 1185 | 523  | 338  | 212  | 101                 | 138                 | 35.64    | 248                | 248                | 0.11     | 0      
|Fabric                 | 810  | 147  | 201  | 166  | 60                  | 116                 | 93.45    | 127                | 222                | 74.96    | 0      
|Cotton Broadwoven Fabs | 657  | 66   | 156  | 83   | 7                   | 44                  | 529.03   | 33                 | 121                | 266.39   | 0.01