alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           3,151
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   97,221
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (2,886)
<INVENTORY>                                     15,861
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               113,348
<PP&E>                                       1,126,330
<DEPRECIATION>                                 386,971
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,674,014
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          499,770
<BONDS>                                        659,907
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       228,313
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,286,024
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,674,014
<SALES>                                        606,403
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               729,038
<CGS>                                           56,751
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   56,751
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               423,351
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                248,936
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            248,936
<DISCONTINUED>                               (664,090)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (415,154)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.05)


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

Certification of Chief Financial Officer 

Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 

 

I, Alfred G. Merriweather, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of ACLARA BioSciences, Inc; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the periods in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

 

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: November 14, 2003
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 943 

To increase the minimum disaster loan amount for which the Small Business 

Administration may require collateral, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 22, 2023 

Mr. KENNEDY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship 

A BILL 

To increase the minimum disaster loan amount for which 

the Small Business Administration may require collateral, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Small Business Dis5 aster Damage Fairness Act of 2023’’. 

6 SEC. 2. COLLATERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR DISASTER 

7 LOANS. 

8 Section 7(d)(6) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 

9 636(d)(6)) is amended in the third proviso— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 943 IS

1 (1) by striking ‘‘$14,000’’ and inserting 

2 ‘‘$25,000’’; and 

3 (2) by striking ‘‘major disaster’’ and inserting 

4 ‘‘disaster’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
#### Austin, appellant, v. Holland.

*Evidence*— *dissolution of partnership, notice of.*

The mailing of a notice of the dissolution of a partnership, properly directed to a dealer with the firm, is only *prima facie*evidence that the notice was received, and may he rehutted hy proof that the person to whom it was directed was not at the place to which it was sent, and that he did not in fact receive it.

Action on a promissory note made by Dillon Beebe & *Co.,*August, 1869, payable to the order of Horace Loveland, and by him transferred to plaintiff, after maturity. The defendant, Holland, was a member of the firm of Dillon Beebe *& Co.,*lumber merchants, Holland residing at Buffalo and Beebe at Toledo. On the 9th of March, 1868, Loveland was employed by the firm as agent. On the 29th day of March, 1869, the partnership was dissolved. A circular letter, containing a notice of the dissolution, was duly deposited in the post-office, directed to said Loveland at Toledo, and another directed to him at Detroit. After the dissolution said Loveland, by direction of Beebe, continued to purchase lumber in the name of Dillon Beebe & Co., until August, 1869, when he settled with Beebe and received the note ip suit as part of his compensation for services.

*254The defendant, Holland, set up as a defense to the action that the said Beebe had, at the time of making the note, no right or authority to bind him by or under the name of Dillon Beebe & Co.

At the trial plaintiff offered to show that Loveland was not in either Toledo or Detroit when the notices of dissolution were mailed, nor for some time thereafter; and that he never received either of these notices, nor knew of the existence of such notices until after the note fell due. The evidence was excluded, and plaintiff excepted. A motion for a nonsuit was granted, and plaintiff appealed.

*M. I.*Townsend, for appellant.

*Eselc Gowen,*for respondent.

Per Gubiam.

We think that Loveland was a dealer with the firm, and that the court erred in excluding the proof offered that Love-land was not in either Toledo or Detroit at the time when the notices were mailed. While the mailing of a notice properly directed maybe *prima facie*presumptive evidence that it was received, yet it is not so entirely conclusive that the presumption may not be rebutted by proof that it was not received. When the person was absent from his residence for a considerable period of time, and not likely to receive the notice, or when engaged in the employment of the firm and absent on their business, the presumption is not as strong as it might be under other circumstances. Whether the notice was received by the plaintiff or not depended upon all the facts connected with the transaction, and’ it was competent, as a part of the surrounding circumstances, to show where the plaintiff was, and that he did not actually receive the notice.

Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, with costs to abide the event.

*Judgment reversed.*
118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 932 

AN ACT 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to provide for the 

halt in pension payments for Members of Congress sentenced for certain offenses, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 932 ES

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No Congressionally 

3 Obligated Recurring Revenue Used as Pensions To Incar4 cerated Officials Now Act’’ or the ‘‘No CORRUPTION 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FORFEITURE OF PENSION. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 8332(o) of title 5, United 

8 States Code, is amended— 

9 (1) by redesignating paragraphs (4), (5), and 

10 (6) as paragraphs (5), (6), and (7), respectively; 

11 (2) by inserting after paragraph (3) the fol12 lowing: 

13 ‘‘(4)(A) Subject to subparagraph (B), an individual 

14 convicted of an offense described in paragraph (2) shall 

15 not be eligible to receive any payment of an annuity pursu16 ant to the retirement system under this subchapter or 

17 chapter 84, except that this sentence applies only to such 

18 payments based on service rendered as a Member (irre19 spective of when rendered). 

20 ‘‘(B) If the conviction of an individual described in 

21 subparagraph (A) is overturned on appeal by a court of 

22 competent jurisdiction, the individual shall receive pay23 ments that the individual would have received but for the 

24 application of subparagraph (A). 

25 ‘‘(C) This paragraph applies only to a conviction that 

26 occurs after the date of enactment of the No Congression-
3 

†S 932 ES

1 ally Obligated Recurring Revenue Used as Pensions To 

2 Incarcerated Officials Now Act.’’; 

3 (3) in paragraph (5)(B)(i), as so redesignated, 

4 by striking ‘‘paragraph (5)’’ and inserting ‘‘para5 graph (6)’’; and 

6 (4) in paragraph (6), as so redesignated, by 

7 striking ‘‘paragraph (4)(B)’’ and inserting ‘‘para8 graph (5)(B)’’. 

9 (b) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMENDMENT.— 

10 Section 719(e)(2) of title 38, United States Code, is 

11 amended by striking ‘‘section 8332(o)(5)’’ and inserting 

12 ‘‘section 8332(o)(6)’’. 

Passed the Senate July 13, 2023. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 
118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 932 

AN ACT 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to provide 

other purposes. Congress sentenced for certain offenses, and for for the halt in pension payments for Members of
§ 28.20 Review by the Superintendent. ( a ) The Superintendent, within 15 working days of the receipt of a copy of an application for a variance, exception, permits for commercial or industrial use, or special permit submitted to the zoning authority for any development, use or change in use shall provide the applicant/landowner and the appropriate zoning authority written comments on the application. The purpose of the Superintendent's review is to determine if the proposed use or development does not conform to the federal standards and the purposes of the Act or is likely to cause significant harm to the natural resources of the Seashore. If the Superintendent's review determines the proposal does not conform, the Superintendent shall inform the applicant/landowner and appropriate zoning authority that should the proposed use or development proceed, the National Park Service may seek to enjoin the development and acquire the property by condemnation.
( b ) The Superintendent may also appeal the decision of the zoning authority pursuant to procedures of local law.
§ 9.3 Access permits. ( a ) All special use or other permits dealing with access to and from claims within any unit are automatically revoked 120 days after January 26, 1977. All operators seeking new or continued access to and from a claim after that date must file for new access permits in accordance with these regulations, unless access to a mining claim is by pack animal or foot. (See § 9.7 for restrictions on assessment work and § 9.9(d) and § 9.10(g) for extensions of permits.)
( b ) Prior to the issuance of a permit for access to any claim or claims, the operator must file with the Superintendent a plan of operations pursuant to § 9.9. No permit shall be issued until the plan of operations has been approved in accordance with § 9.10.
( c ) No access to claims outside a unit will be permitted across unit lands unless such access is by foot, pack animal, or designated road. Persons using such roads for access to such claims must comply with the terms of § 9.15 where applicable.
( d ) In units of the National Park System in Alaska, regulations at 43 CFR part 36 govern access to claims, and the provisions of 36 CFR 9.3 (a), (b) and (c) are inapplicable.
[42 FR 4835, Jan. 26, 1977, as amended at 53 FR 25162, July 5, 1988]
Comment Info: ================= General Comment:FAA-2013-0670; Dir ID 2013-NM-081-AD
SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

ONE HUNDRED SECOND CONGRESS 

FIRST SESSION { 

SECOND SESSION { 

Convened January 3, 7991 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Wednesday, February 27, 1991 

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF WALTER J. STEWART, 

SECRETARY OF THE SENATE 

By Gerald A. Hackett, Executive Clerk 
1 

TREATIES 

Calendar Treaty Subject Reported 

No. Doc. No. Bv 

1 EX. B .. Two Related Protocols to the Convention for Feb 5 91 Reported favorably 

95-1 the Unification of Certain Rules Relating by Mr. Pell, Committee on 

to International Carriage by Air, as Foreign Relations, with a 

Amended (Montreal Aviation Protocols No. 3 resolution of advice and 

and 4). consent to ratification 

with provisos. (Printed 

report--Ex. Rept. 102-1 

together with minority 

views).
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**Certifications
      of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section
      1350**





In
      connection with the annual report of Tekoil & Gas Corporation (the
“Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007, filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Mark S. Western, President
      and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented
      and consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods presented.





Date:
      April 15, 2008





By:
            /s/
                Mark S. WesternMark
                S. WesternPresident
                and Chief Executive Officer




The
      certifications set forth above are being furnished as an exhibit solely pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed to
      be
“filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
      amended, nor shall they be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 1350, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 1350, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
      Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
      upon request.
EXHIBIT 4.1

NUMBER                                                             SHARES

                                                         CUSIP 917025 10 8

                      INCORPORATED IN THE STATE OF DELAWARE

                             URANIUM STRATEGIES INC.

                                  COMMON STOCK



THIS CERTIFIES THAT:




is owner of

         FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF COMMON STOCK OF $.001 PAR VALUE
EACH OF URANIUM STRATEGIES INC. transferable on the books of the Corporation in
person or by attorney upon surrender of this certificate duly endorsed or
assigned. This certificate and the shares represented hereby are subject to the
laws of the State of Nevada, and to the Articles of Incorporation and By-laws of
the Corporation, as now or hereafter amended. This certificate is not valid
until countersigned by the Transfer Agent.

         WITNESS the facsimile seal of the Corporation and the facsimile
signatures of its duly authorized officers.

DATED:

         SECRETARY                   SEAL                       PRESIDENT


                                                                 COUNTERSIGNED:

                                                  OLDE MONMOUTH STOCK TRANSFER
                                                           77 MEMORIAL PARKWAY
                                          ATLANTIC HIGHLANDS, NEW JERSEY 07716
                                                                TRANSFER AGENT
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
balance sheet and statements of operations found on pages 3 and 4 of the
Company's Form 10-QSB for the year to date, and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                             605
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   605
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,630
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,512
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        12,050
<OTHER-SE>                                     (11,932)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     4,630
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,358
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (2,358)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0

</TABLE>
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of-- Infinite Services & Solutions, Inc. Under Contract No. W52P1J-13-G-0067 APPEARANCE FORTHE APPELLANT: ) ) ) ) )

APPEARANCES FORTHE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA No. 61104

Mark B. Carter, Esq.

Taylor English DumaLLP Atlanta, GA Raymond M. Saunders, Esq.

Army ChiefTrial Attorney MAJ Christopher M. Coy, JA

Trial Attorney ORDER OF DISMISSAL The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. Dated: 29 August 2017

OWEN C. WILSON Administrative Judge Vice Chairman Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCA No. 61104, Appeal ofInfinite Services & Solutions, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:

JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
### EXHIBIT 99.2



### Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Rick L. Hurt, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
of Intermountain Refining Co., Inc. certify that

1. I have reviewed the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of
Intermountain Refining Co., Inc;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain
any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

Date: February
16,
2006/s/ Rick L.
HurtRick L.
HurtTreasurer and Chief Financial
Officer