alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1

             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(D)/15D-14(D)
                  UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

I, Anthony N. Renzi, certify that:
1. I have  reviewed  this  report  on Form  10-K and all  reports  on Form  10-D
   required to be filed in respect of the period  covered by this report on Form
   10-K of RALI Series 2006-QA6 Trust (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");
2. Based on my knowledge,  the Exchange Act periodic reports,  taken as a whole,
   do not contain  any untrue  statement  of a material  fact or omit to state a
   material  fact  necessary  to make  the  statements  made,  in  light  of the
   circumstances  under which such  statements  were made, not  misleading  with
   respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based  on  my  knowledge,  all  of  the  distribution,  servicing  and  other
   information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by
   this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;
4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities  performed by the servicers and
   based on my knowledge and the compliance  reviews  conducted in preparing the
   servicer  compliance  statements  required in this report  under Item 1123 of
   Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic  reports,
   the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements
   in all material respects; and
5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance  with  servicing  criteria for
   asset-backed  securities and their related  attestation reports on assessment
   of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to
   be included in this report in accordance  with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and
   Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
   report,  except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances
   of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report
   on Form 10-K.
   In giving the  certifications  above, I have reasonably relied on information
   provided to me by the  following  unaffiliated  parties:  Deutsche Bank Trust
   Company Americas.
Date:  March 26, 2007

By:   /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
      ---------------------
Name:  Anthony N. Renzi
Title:    Managing Director
# EUR-Lex - 12008E270 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008E270

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - PART SIX: INSTITUTIONAL AND FINANCIAL PROVISIONS - TITLE I: INSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS - Chapter 1: The institutions - Section 5: The Court of Justice of the European Union - Article 270 (ex Article 236 TEC) **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0164 - 0164 *

Article 270

(ex Article 236 TEC)

The Court of Justice of the European Union shall have jurisdiction in any dispute between the Union and its servants within the limits and under the conditions laid down in the Staff Regulations of Officials and the Conditions of Employment of other servants of the Union.

--------------------------------------------------
```

[109th Congress Public Law 232]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ232.109]

[[Page 120 STAT. 395]]

Public Law 109-232
109th Congress

                                 An Act

 
  To amend section 308 of the Lewis and Clark Expedition Bicentennial 
    Commemorative Coin Act to make certain clarifying and technical 
           amendments. <<NOTE: June 15, 2006 -  [H.R. 5401]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress <<NOTE: Lewis and Clark 
Commemorative Coin Correction Act. 31 USC 5112 note.>> assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Lewis and Clark Commemorative Coin 
Correction Act''.

SEC. 2. LEWIS AND CLARK COMMEMORATIVE COIN AMENDMENTS.

    Section 308 of the Lewis and Clark Expedition Bicentennial 
Commemorative Coin Act (31 U.S.C. 5112 note) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a), by striking ``Secretary as follows:'' 
        and all that follows through the end of the subsection and 
        inserting the following:

 ``Secretary for expenditure on activities associated with commemorating 
the bicentennial of the Lewis and Clark Expedition, as follows:
            ``(1) National council of the lewis and clark 
        bicentennial.--\1/2\ to the National Council of the Lewis and 
        Clark Bicentennial.
            ``(2) Missouri historical society.--\1/2\ to the Missouri 
        Historical Society.'';
            (2) by redesignating subsection (b) as subsection (c); and
            (3) by inserting after subsection (a) the following new 
        subsection:

    ``(b) Transfer of Unexpended Funds.--Any proceeds referred to in 
subsection (a) that were dispersed by the Secretary and remain 
unexpended by the National Council of the Lewis and Clark Bicentennial 
or the Missouri Historical Society as of June 30, 2007, shall be 
transferred to the Lewis and Clark Trail Heritage

[[Page 120 STAT. 396]]

Foundation for the purpose of establishing a trust for the stewardship 
of the Lewis and Clark National Historic Trail.''.

    Approved June 15, 2006.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 5401:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 152 (2006):
            May 22, considered and passed House.
            May 25, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
#### § 13.1144 How often will commercial fishing lifetime access permit be renewed?

The superintendent will renew lifetime access permit at 5-year intervals for the lifetime of a permittee who continues to hold a valid State limited entry commercial fishing permit, and for halibut an International Pacific Halibut Commission quota share, and is otherwise eligible to participate in the fishery under Federal and State law.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.21

September 29, 2000


Cabot Corporation
Attn: Robert Culver, CFO
Two Seaport Lane
Suite 1300
Boston, Massachusetts 02210

RE: Guarantee of Employee Loans


Ladies and Gentlemen:

         In connection with Cabot Corporation's spin-off of Cabot
Microelectronics Corporation (CMC) Cabot has elected to vest, effective upon the
spin-off, the restricted shares of Cabot common stock awarded to CMC employees
as part of Cabot's 1998 and 1999 Cabot Long Term Incentive Program, as set forth
in Schedule A. The CMC employees paid for the restricted shares of Cabot common
with the proceeds of loans made by Cabot to such individuals (hereafter referred
to as "Loans") as set forth on Schedule A, which also reflects the Loan amounts
currently outstanding. Upon the vesting of such restricted stock, the Loans
would otherwise become due and payable. In order that CMC employees have an
opportunity to sell some of their Cabot and/or CMC shares in the market in order
to repay their loans, and taking into account the turbulent market for Cabot and
CMC stock which is expected to occur after the spin-off, Cabot is willing to
give CMC employees until December 29, 2000 to repay their Loans, provided, that
CMC guarantees the repayment of such Loans.

         In view of the fact that it is appropriate and in the best interests of
CMC and of the CMC employees listed on Schedule A that the Loans not be due
until December 29, 2000, CMC hereby guarantees to Cabot the repayment to Cabot
of the Loans as reflected in the attached Schedule A. In the event any CMC
employee has not repaid his or her Loan to Cabot (including all interest due),
CMC agrees to pay to Cabot, within 10 days, such Loan amounts that remain unpaid
as of December 29, 2000.

                           Very truly yours,

                           CABOT MICROELECTRONICS CORPORATION


                           -------------------------------------------
                           By:    H. Carol Bernstein
                           Title: Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel
§ 222.71 Loss of status. Wild free-roaming horses and burros or their remains shall lose their status under the 1971 Wild Horses and Burros Act. ( a ) Upon passage of title pursuant to § 222.29 (d) and (e).
( b ) Upon transfer to private maintenance and care pursuant to § 222.29(c)(4) and die of natural causes before passage of title;
( c ) Upon destruction by an authorized Forest officer pursuant to § 222.29(c)(5).
( d ) Upon death by natural causes or accident on the National Forest System or on private lands where maintained thereon pursuant to § 222.27 and disposal is authorized by a Forest officer; and
( e ) Upon destruction or death for purposes of or incident to the program authorized in § 222.20(a).
#### Mary A. Guilfoyle, Appellant, *v.*Catherine E. Pierce et al., Respondents.

Reported below, 125 App. Div. 504.

(Submitted January 4, 1909;

decided January 12, 1909.)

Motion to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered April 10, 1908, reversing a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term and granting a new trial.

The motion was made upon the ground that pursuant to a written agreement theretofore entered into between the attorneys of the respective parties to the action, the litigation was to terminate with the decision by the Appellate Division.

*John M. Gardner*for motion.

*Franklin Bien*opposed.

Motion denied, with ten^ dollars costs.
C 

O 

~ U 

Rs r'°1 ( h F-~-1 vCd ..r 

~ 

z~ 

-o 

~ a5 

E 

~ 

0 

~ 

~ 

~ 

0 

~ 

C/) 

~ 

0 .~ 

7s 

~ .~ 

~ 

~1--• 

~ 

~ 

c~ 

.~ 

~i 

~ 

~ 

t-V-- ~ 

~ 

0 

C ~ 

rn 

O 

..~ 

.~ r4 

~ 

~ 

bA 

~ 

.~ 

O 

~ 

~ 

~ «3 

~ 

U 

~ 

~ 

O 

~ 

Q U 

~ 

U 

~ 

~ 

~ 

0 

~ 

~ 

a 

o Q ~ U 

L 

~

Cl- 

~ E ~> o ~✓ UaL1 

tiio 

~ L 

H 

O ~ L 

C/1 . 

°

Q., ,~ U 

...y ~ 

Ei • ~ 

= 

to ~ 

~y 

a' 

V1 cd < ~¢.1 

0 E E 

~ G ~ Q 

~ 

~ 

~ 

v~i O 

E5 ~ s.. ~ O '~ C Q cd 'a v 

O ~ 

v, 

~ 

Q~ 

¢ Q ~ 

i~ ~ 

v ~? '°— ~ a~i 

in 

Q`c~° 

~ Z = 3 a a~~i ° 

N ? ¢ ~ Z ~ 

o 

a, o 

3 = 

~ o-~ ~ ~ ~ ~ b Z y 

z ~ ~ ~ 

C7 d 

`~ ~ 

~23 ° U o ¢ Z ~ 

e~' o ~ 3 bA a~ r~ -°a c ~ 

= 

~ 

La 

s: ~ 

C7 = 

. 

s ^ c ~ " v~ a 

~ `~ ? ~ ° ~~;, 

N 4a 

~~ 

0 ~ 

~`w' 

~ C 

f] ~ 

a~ 

y 

u 

.. ~? 

ci 

~ o~ ~~ ~-o Q 3~ ~~ ~~~ 

A C R 

 ao ou-- 

z r~i, ~ ~ c) 

~ o 

F- Y 

L~ 

GO n 

~ 

-, .~ 

— 3 

GU 3 

~ 3 

.-] - 

N 

:a 

E E 

~=, •`~ 

~ 3 as 

.. E 

~ o 0 0 

> 0 

_ 

7~ o ~ ~ 

C ~ °L' CZ 

~ 

E °O ~ O O op6 ~ 0} ~ a' ~ •~ ~, 

~ w c 

C/] ~ ~ ~ C N 

7 

~ H 
S/22/2014 

Meeting 4bjective 

• Long history of working with EPA with the intent to 

improve Subpart W program to achieve the overall 

goal: 

• An improved emissions inventory for the natural gas 

transmission and storage (T&S) and processing sectors 

• Key issues: 

• Desire to continue to work with EPA to improve program 

while decreasing implementation burden. 

• Initiate an open and transparent regulatory process to 

develop compressor emission factors. 

1 
S/22/2fl14 

Emission Factors 

® Industry is comrnitted to developing T&S and 

processing com?ressor emission factors 

• Studies initiated to evaluate Subpart W and other 

available rr_ethane emissions data. 

• EPA should initiate an open and transparent regulatory 

process to develop new and update existing emission 

factors. 

BAMM Elimination 

• Agree that BAMM can be eliminated if Missing Data 

provisions are expanded 

• Missing Data provisions need to be expanded to 

accomplish goal - otherwise, BAMM would still be 

required 

• Measurement requirement and BAMM linked 

• Address conditions/situations previously approved as BAMM 

- Safety and accessibility 

• Expand missing data provisions beyond those proposed in 

98.235 (a)-(f) 

2 
S/22/2014 

Measurement Fiexibility 

* Retain all available leak detection and measurement 

methods 

• Alternative methods needed to address safety and 

accessibility constraints 

• For exampie, infrared camera 

* Multi-Operating mode requirements are unnecessary 

and increase emissions 

• Measurement in the "as found" mode and identification 

of operating mode sufficient 

• As found practice has resulted in hundreds of 

measurements being obtained in each operating mode 

~ 

QuestiOns 

J

,J 

3
# EUR-Lex - 12008E230 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008E230

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - PART SIX: INSTITUTIONAL AND FINANCIAL PROVISIONS - TITLE I: INSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS - Chapter 1: The institutions - Section 1: The European Parliament - Article 230 (ex Article 197, second, third and fourth paragraph, TEC) **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0151 - 0151 *

Article 230

(ex Article 197, second, third and fourth paragraph, TEC)

The Commission may attend all the meetings and shall, at its request, be heard.

The Commission shall reply orally or in writing to questions put to it by the European Parliament or by its Members.

The European Council and the Council shall be heard by the European Parliament in accordance with the conditions laid down in the Rules of Procedure of the European Council and those of the Council.

--------------------------------------------------
§ 810.2 Procedure for requesting information. ( a ) Requests for information or records not available through informal channels shall be directed to the Administrative Officer, Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, 1522 K Street NW., Washington, DC 20005. All such requests should be clearly marked “FREEDOM OF INFORMATION REQUEST” in order to ensure timely processing. Requests that are not so marked will be honored, but will be deemed not to have been received by the Council, for purposes of computing the response time, until the date on which they are identified by a member of the Council staff as being a request pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act.
( b ) Requests should describe the records sought in sufficient detail to allow Council staff to locate them with a reasonable amount of effort. Thus, where possible, specific information, including dates, geographic location of cases, and parties involved, should be supplied.
( c ) A request for all records falling within a reasonably specific category shall be regarded as conforming to the statutory requirement that records be reasonably described if the records can be identified by any process that is not unreasonably burdensome or disruptive of Council operations.
( d ) If a request is denied on the ground that it does not reasonably describe the records sought, the denial shall specify the reasons why the request was denied and shall extend to the requester an opportunity to confer with Council staff in order to reformulate the request in sufficient detail to allow the records to be produced.
#### Margaret E. McAuley, as Administratrix of the Estate of Hugh McAuley, Deceased, Appellant, *v.*The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Respondent.

(Argued February *22,*1907;

decided March 12, 1907.)

*McAuley v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 112*App. Div. 906, affirmed.

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial . dejiartment, entered March 10,1906, which reversed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial and granted a new trial in an action to recover for the death of plaintiff’s intestate alleged to have been caused by the defendant’s negligence.

*Andrew J. Nellis*for appellant.

*William P. Rudd*for respondent.

Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered against appellant on the stipulation, with costs in all courts; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Yann and Werner, JJ. Not sitting: Gray and Chase, JJ.
Motion Granted; Abatement Order filed July 20 , 2017.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 16

- 00993

- CR

____________ DANIEL MARK POLITTE , Appellant

V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 400th District Court Fort Bend County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 14

- DCR

- 066326



### ABATEMENT ORDER
Appellant filed a motion to abate this case for the trial court to enter findings of fact and conclusions of law regarding the trial court’s decision to admit the appellant’s statement ov er objection and request to suppress evidence. Although appellant requested findings of fact and conclusions of law, none have been filed. When the losing party on a motion to suppress requests findings of fact and conclusions of law, the trial court is re quired to make them. State v. Cullen, 195 S.W.3d 696, 698

– 99 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). Appellant’s motion is granted.Accordingly, t he trial court is directed to reduce to writing its findings of

fact and conclusions of law on the denial of appellant’s motio n to suppress and have a supplemental clerk’s record containing those findings filed with the clerk of
this c ourt within thirty days of the date of this order

. The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this c ourt’s
active docket. Th e appeal will be reinstated on this c ourt’s active docket when the trial court’s findings and recommendations are filed in this c ourt. The c ourt will also consider an appropriate motion to reinstate the appeal filed by either party.

PER CURIAM
Exhibit 31.2

I,
Carl E. Smith, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of MEDecision, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



|Date: March 28, 2008 |  | /s/CARL E. SMITHCarl E. Smith Chief Financial Officer
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 73 (Wednesday, April 16, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 21483]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-08305]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM)

Notice of Availability of the Proposed Notice of Sale (NOS) for 
Western Gulf of Mexico Planning Area (WPA) Outer Continental Shelf 
(OCS) Oil and Gas Lease Sale 238 (WPA Sale 238); MMAA 104000

AGENCY: Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Availability of the Proposed Notice of WPA Sale 238.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: BOEM announces the availability of the Proposed NOS for 
proposed WPA Sale 238. This Notice is published pursuant to 30 CFR 
556.29(c) as a matter of information to the public. With regard to oil 
and gas leasing on the OCS, the Secretary of the Interior, pursuant to 
section 19 of the OCS Lands Act, provides affected States the 
opportunity to review the Proposed NOS. The Proposed NOS sets forth the 
proposed terms and conditions of the sale, including minimum bids, 
royalty rates, and rental rates.

DATES: Affected States may comment on the size, timing, and location of 
proposed WPA Sale 238 within 60 days following their receipt of the 
Proposed NOS. The Final NOS will be published in the Federal Register 
at least 30 days prior to the date of bid opening. Bid opening 
currently is scheduled for August 20, 2014.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Proposed NOS for WPA Sale 238 and a 
``Proposed Notice of Sale Package'' containing information essential to 
potential bidders may be obtained from the Public Information Unit, 
Gulf of Mexico Region, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, 1201 Elmwood 
Park Boulevard, New Orleans, Louisiana 70123-2394. Telephone: (504) 
736-2519. The Proposed NOS and ``Proposed Notice of Sale Package'' also 
are available on BOEM's Web site at http://www.boem.gov/Sale-238/.
    Agency Contact: Robert Samuels, Chief, Leasing Division, 
Robert.Samuels@boem.gov.

    Dated: April 7, 2014.
Tommy P. Beaudreau,
Director, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management.
[FR Doc. 2014-08305 Filed 4-15-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-MR-P
```
§ 1169.10 NEH systems of records that are covered by exemptions under the Privacy Act. ( a ) Pursuant to and limited by 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2), the NEH system entitled “Office of the Inspector General Investigative Files” shall be exempted from the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a, except for subsections (b); (c)(1) and (2); (e)(4)(A) through (F); (e)(6), (7), (9), (10), and (11); and (i), insofar as that NEH system contains information pertaining to criminal law enforcement investigations. NEH has implemented this exemption because application of these provisions of the Privacy Act might alert investigation subjects to the existence or scope of investigations; lead to suppression, alteration, fabrication, or destruction of evidence; disclose investigative techniques or procedures; reduce the cooperativeness or safety of witnesses; or otherwise impair investigations.
( b ) Pursuant to and limited by 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2), the NEH system entitled “Office of the Inspector General Investigative Files” shall be exempted from 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3); (d); (e)(1); (e)(4)(G), (H), and (I); and (f), insofar as that NEH system consists of investigatory material compiled for law enforcement purposes, other than material within the scope of the exemption at 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2).
( c ) Pursuant to and limited by 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(5), the NEH system entitled “Grants and Cooperative Agreements: Electronic Grant Management System” shall be exempted from 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3); (d); (e)(1); (e)(4)(G), (H), and (I); and (f), insofar as that NEH system consists of materials which would reveal the identity of references for fellowship or grant applicants.
( d ) Records on applicants for employment at NEH are covered by the Office of Personnel Management government-wide system notice “Recruiting, Examining, and Placement Records.” These records are exempted as claimed in 5 CFR 297.501(b)(7).
( e ) Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(d)(5), nothing within these regulations shall allow an individual access to any information compiled in reasonable anticipation of a civil action or proceeding.
( f ) NEH may also assert exemptions for records received from another agency that could properly be claimed by that agency in responding to a request.