alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NINETY-NINTH CONGRESS 

FIRST SESSION { 

Convened January 3, 1985 

Adjourned December 20, 1985 

Convened January 21, 1986 

SECOND SESSION { 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Tuesday, April 8, 1986 

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF JO-ANNE L. COE, 

SECRETARY OF THE SENATE 

By Gerald A. Hackett, Executive Clerk 
1 

TREATIES 

Calendar Treaty Subject 

No. Doc. No. 

5 EX. Q, Tax Convention with Denmark 

96-2 

6 98-12 Protocol to Amend the 1980 Tax Convention 

with Denmark 

8 98-30 Tax Agreement with the People's Republic of 

China 

NOMINATIONS 

Calendar Message Nominee, Office, And Predecessor 

No. No. 

Reported 

By 

Dec 11, 85 Reported 

favorably, by Mr. Evans, 

Committee on Foreign 

Relations, with a proposed 

resolution of advice and 

consent to ratif 1cation 

without reservation 

(Printed report--Ex. Rept. 

99-5) 

Do. 

Dec 11, 85 Reported 

favorably, by Mr. Evans, 

Committee on Foreign 

Relations, with a proposed 

resolution of advice and 

consent to ratification 

without reservation 

(Printed report-Ex. Rept 

99-7) 

Reported 

Bv 
2 

-- Calendar Message Nominee, Office, And Predecessor Reported 

No. No. Bv 

- CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY 

COMMISSION 

* 608 401 Terrence M. Scanlon, of the District of Dec 12, 85 Mr. Danforth, 

Columbia, to be Chairman of the Consumer Committee on Commerce, 

Product Safety Commission, vice Nancy Science, and 

Harvey Steorts, resigned, to which Transportation, without 

position he was appointed during the printed report. 

recess of the Senate from October 12, 

1984, until January 3, 1985. 

THE JUDICIARY 

675 881-3 Robert J. Bryan, of Washington, to be Feb 27, 86 Mr. Thurmond, 

United States District Judge for the Committee on the Judiciary, 

* 

* 

* 

Western District of Washington, vice a new without printed report 

position created by P.L. 98-353, approved 

July 10, 1984. 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 

692 818 Daniel Oliver, of Connecticut, to be a Mar 13, 86 Mr. Danforth, 

Federal Trade Commissioner for the Committee on Commerce, 

unexpired term of seven years from Science, and 

September 26, 1981, vice James C. Miller Transportation, without 

III. printed report. 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

730 939 Robert Ortner, of New Jersey, to be Under Mar 25, 86 Mr. Danforth, 

Secretary of Commerce for Economic Committee on Commerce, 

Affairs, vice Sidney Lewis Jones, Science, and 

resigned. Transportation, without 

printed report. 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

734 794 Jed Dean Christensen, of Virginia, to be Mar 26, 86 Mr. McClure, 

Director of the Office of Surface Mining Committee on Energy and 

Reclamation and Enforcement, vice John D. Natural Resources, without 

Ward, resiITTied. .. Printed renort. 

*S1gn1f1es nomtnee's commitment to respond to requests to appear and testify before any duly 

constituted committee of the Senate. 
3 

NOMINATIONS PLACED ON THE SECRETARY'S DESK IN THE 

SERVICE 

SENIOR FOREIGN 

Senior Foreign Service nomination of Edwin G. Corr, which was received by the Senate and 

appeared in the Congressional Record of October 28, 1985.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-7610
HERMAN ELLIS BREWINGTON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MICHAEL JAMES HOWE; NEW HANOVER COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief District Judge. (5:04-ct-00445-FL) Submitted: January 25, 2007 Decided: January 30, 2007 Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Herman Ellis Brewington, Appellant Pro Se. James Redfern Morgan, Jr., WOMBLE CARLYLE, SANDRIDGE & RICE, PLLC, Winston-Salem, North Carolina; Mark Allen Davis, WOMBLE, CARLYLE, SANDRIDGE & RICE, PLLC, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Herman Ellis Brewington appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brewington v. Howe , No. 5:04-ct-00445-FL (E.D.N.C. Aug. 15, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 184 (Friday, September 22, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 55499]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-8088]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and 
Alcoholism Initial Review Group, Health Services, and Behavioral 
Research Review Subcommittee.
    Date: November 1-2, 2006.
    Time: 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Hyatt Regency Bethesda, One Bethesda Metro Center, 7400 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.
    Contact Person: Lorraine Gunzerath, PhD, MBA, Scientific Review 
Administrator, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, 
Office of Extramural Activities, Extramural Project Review Branch, 
5635 Fishers Lane, Room 3043, Bethesda, MD 20892-9304, 301-443-2369, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#254942504b5f4057446548444c490b4b4c4d0b424a53"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4a262d3f24302f382b0a272b232664242322642d253c">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.271, 
Alcohol Research Career Development Awards for Scientists and 
Clinicians; 93.272, Alcohol National Research Service Awards for 
Research Training; 93.273, Alcohol Research Programs; 93.891, 
Alcohol Research Center Grants, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 15, 2006.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 06-8088 Filed 9-21-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 5558 

To require all high-mobility multipurpose wheeled vehicles of the Army to 

be equipped with an anti-lock brake system and electronic stability control kit, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 17 (legislative day, DECEMBER 16), 2024 

Mr. PETERS (for himself and Mr. COTTON) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To require all high-mobility multipurpose wheeled vehicles 

of the Army to be equipped with an anti-lock brake 

system and electronic stability control kit, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ANTI-LOCK BRAKE SYSTEM AND ELECTRONIC 

4 STABILITY CONTROL KIT FOR CERTAIN ARMY 

5 VEHICLES. 

6 (a) REQUIREMENT.—By not later than September 

7 30, 2033, the Secretary of the Army shall ensure that all 

8 high-mobility multipurpose wheeled vehicles of the Army 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 5558 IS

1 are equipped with an anti-lock brake system and electronic 

2 stability control kit. 

3 (b) PLAN.— 

4 (1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 90 days after 

5 the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary 

6 of the Army shall submit to the congressional de7 fense committees a plan to carry out subsection (a). 

8 (2) ELEMENTS.—The plan required under 

9 paragraph (1) shall include each of the following: 

10 (A) A description of the steps required to 

11 increase production of anti-lock brake systems 

12 and electronic stability control kits and retrofit 

13 high-mobility multipurpose wheeled vehicles at 

14 Red River Army Depot, Texas, and its associ15 ated flyaway teams. 

16 (B) An identification of any challenges to 

17 meeting the requirement under subsection (a) 

18 and a list of steps required to address those 

19 challenges. 

20 (C) An estimated monthly rate of retrofits 

21 needed to meet the requirement under sub22 section (a). 

23 (D) A funding plan for carrying out the 

24 steps referred to in subparagraphs (A) and (B). 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 5558 IS

1 (E) An identification of any authorities or 

2 funding required for any secondary destination 

3 transportation necessary to carry out the plan. 

4 (c) ANNUAL CERTIFICATION.—Not later than each of 

5 March 1, 2025, March 1, 2026, and March 1, 2027, the 

6 Secretary of the Army shall certify to the congressional 

7 defense committees that the budget of the Army will en8 able the Army to meet the requirement under subsection 

9 (a). 

10 (d) CONGRESSIONAL DEFENSE COMMITTEES DE11 FINED.—In this section, the term ‘‘congressional defense 

12 committees’’ has the meaning given that term in section 

13 101(a)(16) of title 10, United States Code. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
# EUR-Lex - 12007L/AFI/DCL/36 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12007L/AFI/DCL/36

**Treaty of Lisbon amending the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Community, signed at Lisbon, 13 December 2007 - A. Declarations concerning provisions of the Treaties - 36. Declaration on Article 188 N of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union concerning the negotiation and conclusion of international agreements by Member States relating to the area of freedom, security and justice **

*
Official Journal 306 , 17/12/2007 P. 0261 - 0261 *

36. Declaration on Article 188 N of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union concerning the negotiation and conclusion of international agreements by Member States relating to the area of freedom, security and justice

The Conference confirms that Member States may negotiate and conclude agreements with third countries or international organisations in the areas covered by Chapters 3, 4 and 5 of Title IV of Part Three insofar as such agreements comply with Union law.

--------------------------------------------------
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 202 (Thursday, October 19, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 61784]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-8776]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Special Emphasis Panel, Genetic Factors in Birth 
Defects.
    Date: October 24, 2006.
    Time: 12 p.m. to 3 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6100 Executive Boulevard, 
Room 5B01, Rockville, MD 20852 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Hameed Khan, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Division of Scientific Review, National Institute of 
Child Health and Human Development, NIH, 6100 Executive Blvd., Room 
5B01, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-435-6902, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#dfb4b7beb1b79fb2beb6b3f1b1b6b7f1b8b0a9"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1a71727b74725a777b737634747372347d756c">[email protected]</span></a>.

    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding 
cycle.


(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)
    Dated: October 10, 2006.
Linda Payne,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 06-8776 Filed 10-18-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 623 

AN ACT 

To amend the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act to exclude certain payments to aged, blind, or disabled Alaska 

Natives or descendants of Alaska Natives from being 

used to determine eligibility for certain programs, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 623 ES

1 SECTION 1. ELIGIBILITY FOR CERTAIN PROGRAMS. 

2 Section 29(c) of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement 

3 Act (43 U.S.C. 1626(c)) is amended, in the undesignated 

4 matter following paragraph (3), by striking subparagraph 

5 (E) and inserting the following: 

6 ‘‘(E) an interest in a Settlement Trust or an 

7 amount distributed from or benefit provided by a 

8 Settlement Trust to a Native or descendant of a Na9 tive who is an aged, blind, or disabled individual (as 

10 defined in section 1614(a) of the Social Security Act 

11 (42 U.S.C. 1382c(a)).’’. 

Passed the Senate December 19 (legislative day, December 16), 2024. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 623 

AN ACT 

To amend the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act 

for certain programs, and for other purposes. Natives from being used to determine eligibility disabled Alaska Natives or descendants of Alaska to exclude certain payments to aged, blind, or
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 22

- 00051

- CR

Richard Lynn Waggoner , Appellant

v.
The State of Texas , Appellee

FROM THE COUNTY COURT OF IRION COUNTY NO. CR19

- 3982 , THE HONORABLE MOLLY CRINER , JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

A jury convicted appellant Richard Lynn Waggoner of the Class C misdemeanor offense of driving while license invalid , s ee Tex. Transp. Code § 521.457(a) , and the trial court
assessed punishment at a $300 fine

. Waggoner appealed his c onviction to th is Court

. P ursuant
to a docket

- equalization transfer order by the Texas Supreme Court, see Tex. Gov’t Code § 73.001, the appeal was transferred to t he First District Court of Appeals , which affirmed Waggoner ’ s conviction. See Waggoner v. S tate , No. 01

- 20

- 00074

- CR , 2021 WL 5828936 , at *5 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1 st Dist.] Dec. 9, 2021 , no pet. h.) (me m. op., not designated
for publication ). At some point in J anuary 20 22 , Waggoner, proceeding pro se, filed in this Court
what he captioned a “no tic e of appeal” from the “ appealable order by [ the ] trial court signed on December 9, 2021 , ” w h i c h w a s t h e d a t e his conviction was a f f i r

m e d , and a motion for extension2 of time to file his notice of appeal

. 1 Waggoner ’ s no tice appears to be , in substance, a se cond
attempt to a ppeal his con viction . However, “ only one appeal can be made from a verdict and judgment of conviction in any case , ” Hines v. State , 70 S.W. 955 , 957 (Tex. Crim. App. 1902) ;
McDonald v. State , 401 S.W.3d 360, 361

– 63 (Tex. App.

— Amarillo 201 3, pet. ref ’ d) , and this
Court lacks jurisdiction to review the opinion and judgment of the First District Court of Appeals. Accordingly , we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. 2 We dismiss Waggoner ’ s
motion for extension of time as moot.

_____ _____________________________________ Gisela D. Triana , Justice
Before Justices Goodwin, Baker, and Triana
Filed: Feb ruary 11, 2022
Do Not Publish

1 The exact date when Waggoner mailed his notice is unclear from his filing. In his certificate of service, Waggoner claims to hav e mailed it to this Court on January 3 and January 14 , 2022, but it was notarized on January 24, 2022, the trial court received it on January 27, 2022, and this Court filed it on January 28, 2022. The motion for extension of time was received by this Court on January 25, 2022, and filed on January 28, 2022

.
2 To the ext ent that Waggoner may be attempting to challe nge the judgment affirming hi s conviction , the appropriate procedure would be to file a petition for discretionary review with the Court of Criminal Appeals. See Tex. R. App. P. 68.1

. To the ext ent that any such petition would be untimely at this point , see Tex. R. App. P. 68.2, Waggoner may file with the trial court an application for writ of habeas corpus seeking an out

- of

- time petition for discretionary review. See Ex parte Valdez , 489 S.W.3d 462 , 465

– 66 (Tex. Crim. App. 2016)

.
§ 9.31 When does this subpart apply to me? ( a ) This subpart applies to you if you are an operator who conducts or proposes to conduct non-federal oil or gas operations outside of Alaska.
( b ) If you were operating outside of a System unit and your operation has been included within an existing System unit as a result of a change to the boundary, or included within a newly established System unit, you are subject to §§ 9.50 through 9.53.
( c ) If you were operating under an exemption because your operation accessed oil and gas rights inside the System unit boundary from a surface location outside the boundary, and your surface location has been included within an existing System unit as a result of a change to the boundary, or included within a newly established System unit, you are subject to §§ 9.50 through 9.53.
#### § 9.130 May I cross Federal property to reach the boundary of my oil and gas right?

The Regional Director may grant you the privilege of access, subject to the provisions of any applicable law, on, across, or through federally owned or administered lands or waters in any System unit outside of Alaska to reach the boundary of your oil and gas right.
# CongressionalCandidate Table 7a
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1 

KA 12-01757 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, CENTRA, CARNI, AND WHALEN, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

KEVIN MILON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

 

THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (BARBARA J. DAVIES OF

COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

FRANK A. SEDITA, III, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (DAVID PANEPINTO OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Erie County Court (Michael L.

D’Amico, J.), rendered September 4, 2012. The judgment convicted

defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of manslaughter in the first

degree. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously modified on the law by vacating the sentence and as

modified the judgment is affirmed and the matter is remitted to Erie

County Court for the filing of a predicate felony offender statement

and resentencing. 

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him,

upon his plea of guilty, of manslaughter in the first degree (Penal

Law § 125.20 [1]). We agree with defendant that the waiver of the

right to appeal does not encompass his challenge to the severity of

the sentence because “[t]he plea colloquy fails to establish that

defendant knowingly and intelligently waived [his] right to appeal the

severity of [his] sentence” (People v Maracle, 19 NY3d 925, 927). We

nevertheless reject defendant’s contention that the sentence is unduly

harsh and severe. We note, however, that the record reflects that

defendant is a predicate felon and thus the People were required to

file a predicate felony offender statement in accordance with CPL

400.21 and, if appropriate, County Court was required to sentence

defendant as a second felony offender (see People v Stubbs, 96 AD3d

1448, 1450, lv denied 19 NY3d 1001). Because we cannot permit an

illegal sentence to stand (see id.), we modify the judgment by

vacating the sentence, and we remit the matter to County Court for the

filing of a predicate felony offender statement and resentencing in

accordance with the law (see id.). 

Entered: February 7, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
Exhibit








NINE ENERGY SERVICE, LLC
March 30, 2020
Theodore R. Moore
By Hand Delivery
Dear Ted:
This letter (this “Agreement”) memorializes the agreement between you and Nine Energy Service, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Company”), that, effective as of April 1, 2020, your annualized Base Salary (as such term is defined in that certain Amended and Restated Employment Agreement by and between you and the Company, dated as of November 20, 2018 (the “Employment Agreement”)) will be reduced by 15% to $323,000, less applicable taxes and other withholdings. 
This step is a response to sustained volatility in commodity prices and the economic downturn caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. We appreciate your continued service to the Company and your continued leadership during these challenging times.
Notwithstanding the foregoing or anything to the contrary in this Agreement or the Employment Agreement, for purposes of Section 6.1(b) of the Employment Agreement, your Base Salary shall be deemed to be your Base Salary in effect immediately prior to the effective time of the reduction described in this Agreement, or $380,000 (the “Prior Salary”). 
You acknowledge and represent that you are agreeing to this future salary reduction voluntarily.  By signing below you expressly consent and agree to the reduction set forth in the first paragraph of this Agreement, and hereby waive any and all rights you may have to terminate your employment with the Company for Good Reason (as such term is defined in the Employment Agreement) as a result of the changes described in this Agreement. Except as expressly modified by this Agreement, the terms of the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect and are hereby confirmed and ratified. This Agreement shall automatically terminate and cease to be of any force or effect on the date on which your Base Salary is increased to a level that is equal to or greater than the Prior Salary.
Please sign below to you acknowledge your agreement to these terms. Executed as of the date first set forth above
	
				
	 
	 
	NINE ENERGY SERVICE, LLC.

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	/s/ Ann G. Fox

	 
	 
	Name:
	Ann G. Fox

	 
	 
	Title:
	President, Chief Executive Officer

	 
	 
	 
	 

	AGREED AND ACCEPTED:
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	/s/ Theodore R. Moore
	 
	 

	Name:
	Theodore R. Moore
	 
	 

	Title:
	Senior Vice President and General Counsel