alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### EXHIBIT 99.1



### Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, William N. Hagler, President and Chief Executive
Officer of Intermountain Refining Co., Inc. certify that:

1. I have reviewed the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of
Intermountain Refining Co., Inc;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain
any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

Date:   February
16, 2006/s/ William N.
HaglerWilliam N.
HaglerPresident and Chief Executive
Officer
# EUR-Lex - 12006M050 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12006M050

**Treaty on European Union (consolidated version) - Title VIII - Final provisions - Article 50 **

*
Official Journal C 321 E , 29/12/2006 P. 0035 - 0035 Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0031 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0171 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 191 , 29/07/1992 P. 0063 *

Article 50

1. Articles 2 to 7 and 10 to 19 of the Treaty establishing a Single Council and a Single Commission of the European Communities, signed in Brussels on 8 April 1965, are hereby repealed.

2. Article 2, Article 3(2) and Title III of the Single European Act signed in Luxembourg on 17 February 1986 and in The Hague on 28 February 1986 are hereby repealed.

--------------------------------------------------
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

RALSTON DAVIS

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 18

- 3236

[ July 11, 2019 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Jeffrey R. Levenson

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 05

- 19630 CF10A

.

Matthew R. McLain, McLain Law, P.A., Longwood, for appellant.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

W ARNER

, M AY and K LINGENSMITH

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Phage Genomics, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Graham R. Hughes, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 14th day of May, 2004.

| | /s/ Graham R. Hughes 
Graham R. Hughes
Chief Financial Officer
| | --------------------------------------------------------------
EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF FRANCIS R. VALEO, SECRETARY OF THE SENATE 

BY GERALD A. HACKETT, ExECUTIVE CLERK 

Wednesday, February 1, 1967 

NOMINATION 

Date of Calendar I Message Name o! nominee OHice Predecessor 

report No. No. 

U.S. AIR FORCE 

1967 

Jan. 31 1ti 46 Lt. Gen. Joseph J. Nazzaro, GeneraL ________ _ --------

FR1241 (major general, 

Regular Air Force), U.S. 

Air Force, to be assigned 

to positions of imp ortance and responsibility 

designated by the President, in the grade indicated, under the provisions of sec. 8066, title 

10, of the United States 

Code. 

65-022--'67-No. 7 

U, S, QOVI:RNIIi H1 PRINTING Of'fiC£,151f 7
EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF EMERY L. FRAZIER, SECRETARY OF THE SENATE 

BY LARRY M. WHEELER, EXECUTIVE CLERK 

Thursday, July 28, 1966 

TREATIES 

Date of Calendar! Treaty No. Subject Action o! committee report No. 

-

1965 

June 29 2 Ex. H (86th Cong., Hague Protocol to Warsaw Convention ____ lteported favorably by 

1st sess.). Mr. Fulbright from 

the Committee on 

Foreign Relations, 

with a printed report. 

(See Ex. Rept. No.3, 

89th Cong., Jst sess.) 

Aug. 3 3 Ex. D (88th Cong., Consular Convention With the Soviet Reported favorably by 

2d sess.). Union. Mr. Fulbright from 

the Committee on 

Foreign Relations, 

with a printed report, 

(See Ex. Rept. No. 4, 

89th Cong., lst sess.) 

Minority views filed 

Aug. 5, 1965. (See 

Ex. Rept. No.4, p. 2, 

89th Cong., 1st seas.) 

t.s. GOVERNMENT PRIHTINC. OFFICE:J!UI 

65-022--66--No.247
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In
connection with the Amended Quarterly Report of Integrated Media
Holdings,  Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the period
ending March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Rene A. Schena certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:







(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and







(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/  Rene
A. Schena




Rene A.
Schena


Chief
Executive Officer
Date of 

report 

1969 

May 23 

29 

~.ruatt nf tqr luitrh •tttt.es 

NINETY-FIRST CONGRESS 

FIRST SESSION {Convened January 3, I969 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Prepared under the direction of FRANCIS R. V ALEO, Secretary of the Senate 

By GERALD A. HAcKETT, Executive Clerk 

Monday, June 16, 1969 

NOMINATIONS 

Calendar Message Name or nominee Office Predecessor 

No. No 

- DEPARTMENT OF THE 

INTERIOR 

384 229 Charles H. Meacham, of Commissioner of F1sh and [Reported favorably 

Alaska. Wildlife, Department of by Mr. Inouye, for 

the Interior Mr. Magnuson, 

from the Committee 

on Commerce, with 

a printed report. 

(See Ex. Rept. No. 

5, 9lst Cong., 1st 

sess.)] 

SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES 

CONTROL BOARD 

387 262 Otto F. Otepka, of Mary- A member of the Sub- Edward C. Sweeney, 

land. versive Activities Con- deceased. 

trol Board for the re- [Reported favorably 

mamder of the term by Mr Byrd of 

exp1ring Aug. 9, 1970. West Virginia, for 

Mr. McClellan, 

from the Comm1tte e 

on the Judiciary, 

with a printed report together with 

minority and 

individual views. 

(See Ex. Rept. N () 

6, 9lst Cong., 1st 

sess.) l 

98-022-69- No. 44 
2 

i I 

Date ol Name of nominee Office Predecessor i C~~ndar 1 l\!~~~e 

report I_ :_:~_1----------------·l-------------l·-----·-----

Jnm• 12 .J I 

[NEW REPORT] 

FEDERAL POWER 

COMMISSION 

.John N. Nil'>ilikn~, of NPw 

II a mp:>hire. 

A member of the Fedcrn,l 

Power Commi~sion for 

the remainder of the 

term expiring June 22, 

1970. 

Lee C. White. 

11 S G')VERNMENT PRINTING OF'F'ICE 1969
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20463

ADVISORY OPINION 2015-14 (HILLARY FOR AMERICA)

CONCURRING STATEMENT OF CHAIRMAN MATTHEW S. PETERSEN AND

COMMISSIONERS CAROLINE S. HUNTER AND LEE E. GOODMAN

This advisory opinion is the first opinion issued by the Commission since the U.S. Court 

of Appeals’ decision in Van Hollen v. FEC,

1 which reminded us that the Federal Election 

Campaign Act of 1971, as amended, contains a “purpose-laden definition of ‘contribution’” that 

informs our regulatory actions.2 Under a similar “purpose-laden” analysis, the Commission 

concluded that a stipend awarded to a student who interned on a campaign was for bona fide 

educational objectives, not compensation for personal services and thus was not a contribution 

under 11 C.F.R. § 100.54.

To the extent that this opinion contradicts past advisory opinions that reached different 

conclusions, those advisory opinions are superseded.3

We hope the Commission’s new approach will promote civic engagement by generations 

of young Americans and we are gratified by this development.

																																																												 1 Van Hollen v. Federal Election Commission, No. 15-5016, slip op. (D.C. Cir. Jan. 21, 2016).

2 Id. at 11 (finding regulation “persuasive” because “the FEC’s purpose requirement is consistent with the 

purpose-laden definition of ‘contribution’ set forth in FECA’s very own definitional section” citing 52 U.S.C. § 

30101(8)(A)(i)).

3 See, e.g., Advisory Op. 1979-67 (RNC-DNC) (Vanderbilt University offered scholarship for an educational 

program that included a three to four week experience at the Democratic National Committee or the Republican 

National Committee, and either a Senate or Congressional office or campaign headquarters in the teacher’s home 

state; Commission recognized the educational purpose but concluded that participants could not engage in 

campaign-related services); Advisory Op. 1982-31 (Koenig) (New York University Law School educational stipend 

for student’s legal and accounting services provided to a federal campaign permissible pursuant to 52 U.S.C. § 

30101(8)(B)(viii) but any other services were deemed impermissible); Advisory Op. 1985-17 (non-profit 

organization’s proposed scholarship fund for Senate and House interns permissible so long as interns do not engage 

in any “Federal election activity”); Advisory Op. 2003-20 (Rep. Silvestre Reyes) (non-profit organization’s

scholarship fund to support Hispanic students in El Paso, Texas, pursuing undergraduate degrees does not make 

contributions or expenditures so long as recipients do not engage in election activities “as part of, or in exchange for, 

the scholarship”). Like the internship program at the New York University Law School at issue in AO 1982-31, but 

unlike the Vanderbilt University internship program at issue in AO 1979-67, the DePauw Grant Program is open to 

all students regardless of whether the students receive academic credit for their respective internships.
# CongressionalCandidate Table 7

&"Arial,Bold"&10&KFF0000This table was generated on 5/11/20.
§ 228.106 Operator's submission of surface use plan of operations. ( a ) *General.* No permit to drill on a Federal oil and gas lease for National Forest System lands may be granted without the analysis and approval of a surface use plan of operations covering proposed surface disturbing activities. An operator must obtain an approved surface use plan of operations before conducting operations that will cause surface disturbance. The operator shall submit a proposed surface use plan of operations as part of an Application for a Permit to Drill to the appropriate Bureau of Land Management office for forwarding to the Forest Service, unless otherwise directed by the Onshore Oil and Gas Order in effect when the proposed plan of operations is submitted.
( b ) *Preparation of plan.* In preparing a surface use plan of operations, the operator is encouraged to contact the local Forest Service office to make use of such information as is available from the Forest Service concerning surface resources and uses, environmental considerations, and local reclamation procedures.
( c ) *Content of plan.* The type, size, and intensity of the proposed operations and the sensitivity of the surface resources that will be affected by the proposed operations determine the level of detail and the amount of information which the operator includes in a proposed plan of operations. However, any surface use plan of operations submitted by an operator shall contain the information specified by the Onshore Oil and Gas Order in effect when the surface use plan of operations is submitted.
( d ) *Supplemental plan.* An operator must obtain an approved supplemental surface use plan of operations before conducting any surface disturbing operations that are not authorized by a current approved surface use plan of operations. The operator shall submit a proposed supplemental surface use plan of operations to the appropriate Bureau of Land Management office for forwarding to the Forest Service, unless otherwise directed by the Onshore Oil and Gas Order in effect when the proposed supplemental plan of operations is submitted. The supplemental plan of operations need only address those operations that differ from the operations authorized by the current approved surface use plan of operations. A supplemental plan is otherwise subject to the same requirements under this subpart as an initial surface use plan of operations.
#### § 291.7 Public awareness and education.

The Chief of the Forest Service will establish a program to increase public awareness about the significance of paleontological resources on National Forest System lands.
§ 72.52 Recovery Action Program grant applications. The application procedure for Recovery Action Program grants differs from the procedure for Rehabilitation and Innovation grants. Ranking and selection for funding of Recovery Action Program grants will be initiated on the basis of a full application, preparation of which will be assisted through meetings with NPS regional staff. ( a ) *Preapplication Conference.* In the preparation of a Recovery Action Program grant application, applicants are encouraged to discuss with NPS regional personnel, or State personnel, when an agreement between NPS and the State covers such action, the adequacy of the proposal in meeting the requirements for a Recovery Action Program. Prior to formal submission, the Recovery Action Program grant application should be reviewed with the appropriate NPS Regional Office.
( b ) *Submission of Applications.* In addition to Standard Form 424 on Federal Assistance notification, applicants for Recovery Action Program grants shall submit the following documents and required attachments to NPS Regional Offices: ( 1 ) OMB Form 80-RO190, completed as prescribed by OMB Circular A-102. (Application for Federal assistance, for non-construction programs).
( 2 ) Grant agreement form.
( 3 ) Narrative statements which will be used in evaluating grant applications in relationship to the selection criteria as defined in § 72.50(a), including: ( i ) The need for the planning grant.
( ii ) The jurisdiction's existing or proposed commitments to developing a full Recovery Action Program and an ongoing planning process.
( iii ) The relationship of the planning program to overall community plans and programs.
( iv ) Appropriateness of the proposed planning program's scope, timing and methodology in relation to UPARR planning requirements and the community's identified planning needs.
( v ) Dollars and work years to be devoted to development of each element in the proposed Recovery Action Program, including some indications of the qualifications of staff members who will work on the program.
( vi ) If appropriate, a discussion of work elements to be contracted out to other government agencies, private consultants or private non-profit agencies, including the reasons for contracting work elements instead of doing the work within the community's own planning agencies.
( 4 ) Applications for RAP grants need a full 60 day A-95 clearinghouse review. Clearinghouse comments for RAP grants must then be submitted to NPS. Final RAP's also must be submitted to clearinghouses, in accordance with OMB Circular A-95.
# PAC Table 4a

&"Arial,Bold"&10&KFF0000This table was generated on 8/25/20.
# German-American Day, 2006

Throughout our history, the spirit and hard work of German Americans have been an important part of the cultural fabric of our Nation. On German-American Day, we celebrate German Americans and their many contributions to the character of our country.

Germans were among the first to settle in this great land of promise, and their talent, faith, and strong values helped establish this country as a place of freedom and opportunity. Today, millions of German Americans are adding to the success and prosperity of our Nation as leaders in government, sports, business, science, the arts, and many other fields.

In every generation, German Americans have courageously stepped forward to serve in our country's hour of need. During the Revolutionary War, General Friedrich von Steuben helped train the Continental Army for battle, and in World War II, great men like General Dwight Eisenhower and Admiral Chester Nimitz helped lead the Allied Forces to victory. Our Nation will always be grateful to the many German Americans who have selflessly answered the call to defend liberty and advance the cause of freedom as members of our Armed Forces. The sacrifices of these heroes help preserve the ideals of our country's founding and make the world a safer place.

German-American Day is also an opportunity to recognize the friendship between Germany and the United States. By working together as partners in peace with a mutual commitment to liberty, the United States and Germany can lay the foundation for a more hopeful tomorrow. 

                    NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim October 6, 2006, as German-American Day. I encourage all Americans to celebrate our Nation's German heritage and the many ways German Americans have enriched and strengthened our country.                          ( print page 59004)    

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this third day of October, in the year of our Lord two thousand six, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-first. 

[FR Doc. 06-8560

Billing code 3195-01-P
§ 9.308 Permit modification, suspension, and cancellation. ( a ) A proposal to modify, supplement, or otherwise amend an approved permit shall be made by an AMRAP agency by written request to the Regional Director. The Regional Director shall review and promptly act on the proposed modification pursuant to the standards set forth in § 9.306. An AMRAP agency may not undertake any of the activities proposed in the modification until the Regional Director approves the modification and the Superintendent amends the approved permit.
( b ) The Superintendent may modify, suspend or cancel an AMRAP agency's permit by notifying the agency in writing, or orally in an emergency situation, when the Superintendent determines that: ( 1 ) Changes to the permit are necessary to address conditions not previously anticipated; or
( 2 ) There is imminent threat of serious, irreparable, or immediate harm or danger to public health and safety, or the natural and cultural resources and values of the unit; or
( 3 ) The AMRAP agency or its contractors fails to comply with the provisions of ANILCA or of any other applicable law or regulation, the provisions and conditions of the approved permit and any modification thereto, or any written or field orders issued by the Superintendent.
( c ) Modification, suspension, or cancellation of an approved permit pursuant to paragraph (b) of this section shall be effective immediately upon receipt of oral or written notice from the Regional Director or the Superintendent. Notices issued orally shall be followed by written notice sent by certified mail within three (3) working days confirming and explaining the action. Suspensions shall remain in effect until the basis for the suspension has been corrected to the satisfaction of the Superintendent. Cancellation notices shall state the reason for cancellation and shall be sent by the Superintendent to the AMRAP agency at least fourteen (14) days in advance of the date the cancellation will become effective.
( d ) Suspension or cancellation of a permit to conduct AMRAP activities shall not relieve the AMRAP agency or its contractors of the obligation to restore any location in accordance with the requirements of this subpart and to comply with all other obligations specified in this subpart and in the permit.
[56 FR 22652, May 16, 1991. Redesignated and amended at 81 FR 77992, 78005, Nov. 4, 2016]
#### Johannes E. Schroeder et al., as Ancillary Administrators of the Estate of Johannes E. Schroeder, Deceased, Appellants, *v.*Albion L. Page, as Ancillary Executor of John M. Young, Deceased, Respondent.

*Sohroeder*v. *Page,*134 App. Div. 938, affirmed.

(Argued January 25, 1909;

decided February 9, 1909.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered March 25, 1908, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at a Trial Term in an action to recover damages alleged to have been sustained by plaintiffs’ intestate through the misconduct of the defendant’s testator while acting under a power of attorney.

*Edward A. Alexander*for appellants.

*Alfred B. Cruikshank*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Cray, Haight, Werner, Hiscook and Chase, JJ. Absent: Willard Bartlett, J.
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

**____________** No. 23 - 50195 Summary Calendar

**____________ United States of America,**  Plaintiff
— Appellee **,** versus **Victor Manuel Corona -**  **Lopez,** Defendant
— Appellant **.**

**______________________________** Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:22 - CR - 1671 - 1

**__________ ____________________**  Before **Smith, Higginson,** and **Engelhardt,** Circuit Judges **. Per Curiam**  **:** ***** Victor Corona - Lopez appeals his conviction and sentence for illegal reentry under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(1). Corona - Lopez contends that treating a prior felony conviction that increases the statutory maximum under § 1326(b) as a sentencing factor, rather than a separate element of the offense, is unconstitutional . He has filed an unopposed motion for summary dispos i tion and a letter brief conceding, correctly, that this issue is foreclosed by

**_____________________** * This opinion is not designated for publication. See **5th Cir .**  **R .**  47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED September 12, 2023 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 23-50195 Document: 00516891816 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/12/2023No. 23 - 50195

2 Almendarez - Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224 (1998). See United States v. Pervis , 937 F.3d 546, 553 – 54 (5th Cir. 2019). Corona - Lopez asserts that he has raised the issue only to preserve it for possible further review. Because summary disposition is appropriate, see Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis , 406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969), the motion is **GRANTED** , and the judgment is **AFFIRMED** . Case: 23-50195 Document: 00516891816 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/12/2023