alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Eugene J. Coleman et al., as Administrators of the Estate of James Coleman, Deceased, Appellants, *v.*The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Respondent.

(Argued March 5, 1907;

decided April 2, 1907.)

*Coleman*v. *N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co.,*113 App. Div. 903, affirmed.

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered June 22, 1906, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint hy the court at a Trial Term in an action to recover for the death of plaintiffs’ intestate alleged to have been caused by defendant’s negligence.

*Daniel V. Murphy*for appellants.

*Charles A. Pooley*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ. Not sitting: Gray and Hiscook, JJ.
118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 758 

AN ACT 

To amend the Tariff Act of 1930 to protect personally 

identifiable information, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 758 ES

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Moving Americans Pri3 vacy Protection Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. PROTECTION OF PERSONALLY IDENTIFIABLE IN5 FORMATION. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (2) of section 431(c) 

7 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1431(c)) is amended 

8 to read as follows: 

9 ‘‘(2)(A) The information listed in paragraph (1) shall 

10 not be available for public disclosure if— 

11 ‘‘(i) the Secretary of the Treasury makes an af12 firmative finding on a shipment-by-shipment basis 

13 that disclosure is likely to pose a threat of personal 

14 injury or property damage; or 

15 ‘‘(ii) the information is exempt under the provi16 sions of section 552(b)(1) of title 5, United States 

17 Code. 

18 ‘‘(B) The Secretary shall ensure that any personally 

19 identifiable information, including Social Security num20 bers and passport numbers, is removed from any manifest 

21 signed, produced, delivered, or electronically transmitted 

22 under this section before access to the manifest is provided 

23 to the public.’’. 
3 

†S 758 ES

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) shall take effect on the date that is 30 days 

3 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Passed the Senate March 9, 2023. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 
118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 758 

AN ACT 

To amend the Tariff Act of 1930 to protect personposes. ally identifiable information, and for other pur-
Date of 

report 

---

1967 

June 23 

23 

23 

~ruatr of t4r lnitrb @Jtatts 

NINETIETH CONGRESS 

FIRST SESSION-Began January 10, 1967 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Prepared under the di1'ection of FRANCIS R. VALEO, Secretary of the Senate 

By GERALD A. HACKETT, Executive Clerk 

Monday, June 26, 1967 

NOMINATIONS 

Calendar Message I Name of nominee Office Predecessor 

No l'o 

-

AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOP· 

MENT 

777 247 James P. Grant, of V1rginia. An Assistant Administrator of the Agency for 

International Development. 

NATIONAL LABOR RE· 

LATIONS BOARD 

778 196 Arnold Ordman, of Mary- General Counsel of the Reappointment. 

land. National Labor Relations Board for a term 

of 4 years. 

COASTAL PLAINS RE· 

GIONAL COMMISSION 

779 235 J. Russell Tuten, of Federal Cochairman of the 

Georgia. Coastal Plains Regional 

Commission. 

65-022--67--No.62 

U S GOVERN MENT PRLNTING OFF'ICE 1967
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 39998

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

TOMMY EUGENE TIEDEMANN,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

2013 Unpublished Opinion No. 353

Filed: February 12, 2013

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED 

OPINION AND SHALL NOT 

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada

County. Hon. Deborah A. Bail, District Judge. 

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of five years, with a minimum 

period of confinement of two years, for unlawful possession of a 

firearm, affirmed.

Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Shawn F. Wilkerson, Deputy 

Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Kenneth K. Jorgensen, Deputy 

Attorney General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before GUTIERREZ, Chief Judge; GRATTON, Judge;

and MELANSON, Judge

PER CURIAM

Tommy Eugene Tiedemann pled guilty to unlawful possession of a firearm. I.C. § 18-

3116. In exchange for his guilty plea, an additional charge and an allegation that Tiedemann was 

a persistent violator were dismissed. The district court sentenced Tiedemann to a unified term of 

five years, with a minimum period of confinement of two years. Tiedemann appeals.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the 

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and 

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-

15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 
2

1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing 

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record 

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Tiedemann’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
# Diario Oficial C 94A/28 d

| | ISSN 1725-244X |
| --- | --- |
| Diario Oficial
  de la Unión Europea | C 94A |
| | |
| Edición en lengua española | Comunicaciones e informaciones | 50o año28 de abril de 2007 |

ISSN 1725-244X

Diario Oficial

de la Unión Europea

C 94A

Edición en lengua española

Comunicaciones e informaciones

50o año28 de abril de 2007

---

| Número de información | Sumario | Página |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | Corrección de errores |
| 2007/C 094A/01 | Corrección de errores del Anuncio de concurso: Responsable de investigación — Especialista en prospecciones sociológicas — Referencia: EF/TA/07/02 (DO C 68 A de 24.3.2007) | 1 |

Número de información

Sumario

Página

Corrección de errores

2007/C 094A/01

Corrección de errores del Anuncio de concurso: Responsable de investigación — Especialista en prospecciones sociológicas — Referencia: EF/TA/07/02 (DO C 68 A de 24.3.2007)

1

| ES | |
| --- | --- |

ES

---

Corrección de errores

| 28.4.2007 | ES | Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea | CA 94/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2007

ES

Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea

CA 94/1

---

Corrección de errores del Anuncio de concurso: Responsable de investigación — Especialista en prospecciones sociológicas — Referencia: EF/TA/07/02

(
  Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea C 68 A de 24 de marzo de 2007
  )

(2007/C 94 A/01)

En la página 4, en el título V, «PRESENTACIÓN DE CANDIDATURAS»:

en lugar de:

«[...] 20 de abril de 2007 [...]»,

léase:

«[...] 1 de junio de 2007 [...]».

---
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 755 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 755

   To prohibit the Secretary of the Air Force from entering into an 
 agreement that would provide for or permit the joint use of Homestead 
   Air Reserve Base, Homestead, Florida, by the Air Force and civil 
                               aircraft.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 9, 2023

    Mr. Rubio (for himself and Mr. Scott of Florida) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                             Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To prohibit the Secretary of the Air Force from entering into an 
 agreement that would provide for or permit the joint use of Homestead 
   Air Reserve Base, Homestead, Florida, by the Air Force and civil 
                               aircraft.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting Critical Ecosystems and 
Military Readiness in Florida Act of 2023''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON JOINT USE OF HOMESTEAD AIR RESERVE BASE WITH 
              CIVIL AVIATION.

    The Secretary of the Air Force may not enter into an agreement that 
would provide for or permit the joint use of Homestead Air Reserve 
Base, Homestead, Florida, by the Air Force and civil aircraft.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 9.2



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-52934, No. 333-52934-01, No. 333-80245, No.333-80245-01, No. 333-09774, No. 333-70636,
No. 333-07214, No. 333-07212 and No. 033-41068 of Koninklijke Ahold N.V. on Form F-3, Form S-3 and Form S-8, as applicable, of our report dated June 10, 2005, relating to the consolidated financial statements of ICA AB and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2004 and for the year then ended, appearing in Exhibit 15.1 of this Annual Report on Form 20-F/A (Amendment No. 2) of Koninklijke Ahold N.V. for the year ended January 2, 2005.



|                        
|------------------------
|                        
|/s/ Deloitte & Touche AB
|Malmö, Sweden           
|June 22, 2005
#### Erpenbach v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co.

1. Where an order dismissing' an appeal from a justice court recites that the motion to dismiss was regularly brought on for hearing, and there is nothing in the record on appeal from such order that contradicts such recital, it will be presumed that notice was given, if required.

2. A bond on appeal from a justice court is requisite to give the appellate court jurisdiction, and cannot be waived by agreement of parties.

(Opinion filed Oct. 18, 1898.)

Appeal from circuit court, Hutchinson county, Hon. E. G Smith, Judge.

*202Action by William Erpenbach against the Chicago, Milwaukee *&*St. Paul Railway Company. From an order dismissing an appeal from an order and judgment of a justice of the- peace refusing to vacate a default judgment against it, defendant appeals.

Affirmed.

*Robert B. Tripp*for appellant.

*W. J. Hooper*for respondent.

Haney,'J.

Defendant appealed to the circuit court, on questions of law alone, from an order and judgment entered by a j ustice of the peace refusing to vacate a default judgment. On the notice of appeal is the following indorsement: “Due service of the within admitted this 19th day of February, 1897, and undertaking for costs and stay pending this appeal is hereby waived. [Signed] W. J. Hooper, Attorney for Plaintiff.” The case having been placed upon the calendar of the circuit court, and having been regularly brought on for trial, the plaintiff interposed the following motion: “The plaintiff, appearing at this time specially, and limiting his appearance for the purpose of this motion, moves, the court to dismiss the appeal (1) because no undertaking on appeal has been given or filed by defendant, as required by law; (2) that there is no appeal from an order of the justice refusing to vacate a default judgment.” Thereupon the court made the following order, from which defendant appealed to this court: “The foregoing motion of the plaintiff to dismiss the appeal of defendant herein having been regularly brought on to be heard upon the notice of appeal herein, indorsements thereon, and the transcript of the justice, with the papers transmitted to this court by him on said appeal, W. J. Hooper appearing for the plaintiff, and R *203B. Tripp for the defendant, and the court being now advised in the premises, it is ordered and adjudged that the said appeal be, and the same hereby is, dismissed; to which the defendant excepts, and its exception is allowed. ” It is suggested in defendant’s brief that there was no notice of the motion to dismiss, and therefore the circuit court erred in dismissing the appeal. Assuming that notice was necessary, the order recites that the motion to dismiss was regularly brought on for hearing, and there is nothing in the record which contradicts such recital. The precise question raised by the first ground of plaintiff’s motion to dismiss was decided by this court in Brown v. Railway Co., 75 N. W. 198. The order of the circuit court is affirmed.
Presidential Documents

59361 

Federal Register 

Vol. 71, No. 195 

Tuesday, October 10, 2006 

Title 3— 

The President 

Proclamation 8063 of October 4, 2006 

Leif Erikson Day, 2006 

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation 

Leif Erikson Day honors a great son of Iceland and grandson of Norway 

who became one of the first Europeans known to reach North America. 

This day is also an opportunity to celebrate the generations of Nordic Americans who have contributed to our country and strengthened the ties that 

forever bind the United States with Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, 

and Sweden. 

Like the crew of risk takers that Leif Erikson boldly led on a quest to 

find new lands, Americans have always valued the ideals of exploration 

and discovery. A desire to seek and understand inspired their voyage more 

than a millennium ago, and it remains a central part of our national character 

as a new generation pursues great new goals today. Nordic Americans continue to make valuable contributions to our society that have expanded 

human knowledge and helped make our world a better place. 

To honor Leif Erikson and to celebrate our citizens of Nordic-American 

heritage, the Congress, by joint resolution (Public Law 88–566) approved 

on September 2, 1964, has authorized the President to proclaim October 

9 of each year as ‘‘Leif Erikson Day.’’ 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States 

of America, do hereby proclaim October 9, 2006, as Leif Erikson Day. I 

call upon all Americans to observe this day with appropriate ceremonies, 

activities, and programs to honor our rich Nordic-American heritage. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this fourth day 

of October, in the year of our Lord two thousand six, and of the Independence 

of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-first. 

[FR Doc. 06–8610 

Filed 10–6–06; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 3195–01–P 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with RULESGWBOLD.EPS</GPH>
Total U.S. Exports to  Guinea

Data in Thousand Dollars 

Data For  JUN. 1999

|Group                  | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | Year to Date 6/1998 | Year to Date 6/1999 | % Change | Year Ending 6/1998 | Year Ending 6/1999 | % Change | % Share
|---------------------- | ---- | ---- | ---- | ---- | ------------------- | ------------------- | -------- | ------------------ | ------------------ | -------- | -------
|TEXTILES & APPAREL     | 673  | 1655 | 2083 | 1860 | 920                 | 216                 | -76.51   | 1984               | 1156               | -41.76   | 0.01   
|TOTAL APPAREL          | 328  | 331  | 344  | 270  | 138                 | 95                  | -31.39   | 200                | 227                | 13.25    | 0      
|TEXTILE MILL PRODUCTS  | 345  | 1324 | 1739 | 1590 | 782                 | 122                 | -84.47   | 1784               | 929                | -47.93   | 0.01   
|Fabric                 | 227  | 1232 | 1568 | 1444 | 674                 | 91                  | -86.46   | 1518               | 862                | -43.23   | 0.02   
|M&B Trousers, Shorts   | 26   | 77   | 97   | 106  | 0                   | 0                   |          | 9                  | 106                | 1074.01  | 0.01   
|MMF Broadwoven Fabs    | 58   | 98   | 0    | 141  | 0                   | 6                   |          | 0                  | 146                |          | 0.01   
|Speclty & Indstrl Fabs | 0    | 1015 | 1468 | 1191 | 561                 | 0                   | -100     | 1405               | 630                | -55.17   | 0.04
# EUR-Lex - 12008E060 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008E060

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - PART THREE: UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS - TITLE IV: FREE MOVEMENT OF PERSONS, SERVICES AND CAPITAL - Chapter 3: Services - Article 60 (ex Article 53 TEC) **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0071 - 0071 *

Article 60

(ex Article 53 TEC)

The Member States shall endeavour to undertake the liberalisation of services beyond the extent required by the directives issued pursuant to Article 59(1), if their general economic situation and the situation of the economic sector concerned so permit.

To this end, the Commission shall make recommendations to the Member States concerned.

--------------------------------------------------
## THEATORNEY GENERAL OF-XAS

FVILL WILSON A-GXUGZY GENERAI. August 26, 1960
HonorableWilliam J. Gillespie opinion I-JO. ww-916 County Attorney Lubbock County Be: May a business that temporarily Lubbock,Texas furnlahes trallera to its farm customers for hauling a tank and poison apparatus claim an exemption from registering such trailer under Art. 6675n-2. Dear Mr. Gillespie: V.A.T.S.?

We quoteyour letterof May 21, 1960, to theAttorney General in part ae foilowe:

"During certain periods of the growing eeaeonhere on the plains, a majorportion of the agriculturalbusiness is the selling of poisons to farms. . . .These businesses furnish the trailer on which the apparatus ishauled. In most cases, the trailer is used only to haul. All of the businesseswho furnish trailers . .areclaiming an exemption f&rregistration under Article 6675~-2, Vernon'sAnnotated Texas Statutes. They claim an exemptionunder the above cited article as Par!n trailers. “Question: May a bueineas that temporarily furnishes trailers to ita farm cuetomera for hauling a tank and poison spraying apparatus claim an exemption from registering such trailer under Article 6675A-2, V.A.T.S.?" Article 667>A-2,V.A.T.S. is the Texas Registration law requiring the owner of a motor vehicle, trailer or semi-trailer used or to be used on the publichighways of this State to register such vehicle. This law excepts "ownersof farm tractors, farm trailers, farm semitrailers, implementsof husbandry andmachinery . . .oueratedormoved temporarilyupon thehighways . . .and providing further that the exemption in this section shall not apply to any farm trailer or farm semitrailerwhen the same is used for hire . . .“ (Emphasisadded.)

Article 6675A-2 (q) states: By "operatedormoved temporarilyupon,thehighways is meant the operation or conveying between different farme, and the operation or conveyance from the owner's farm to the placewhere his farm produce is preparedHonorable William J Gillespie, page 2 

## (w-916)

for market or where seme Is actuallymarketed and return." (Emphasisadded.) Here the trailers are not owned by farmers,but by people or firmswho sell to farmers. Subsection (q) quoted just above, applies to trailers owned by farmers.

Since the business firm temporarily furnishing the trailers cannot conform to the requirements set out in definition (q) ofArticle 6675~-1,as to‘what constitutesa trailer "operatedor moved temporarily upon the highways" (Article 6675A-2), these trailers cannot come under the exemptions contained in Article 6675A-2and must be registered as said Article requires.

SXIMMARY

A business that temporarilyfurnishes trailers to its farm customers for hauling a tank and poison apparatus cannot claim an exemption from registering such trailer under Article 667%-2, V.A.T.S. Very trulyyours,

WILL WILSOR ygy;;Y&

Assistant JCP:bg APPROVED: OP3xIOBI

COMwTTEE W. V Geppert, Chairman James M. Farris William T. Blackburn Virgil Pulllam Martha Jo Stroud REVIEWEDFOR THE ATTORNEY GEZ?ERAL BY: Leonard Passmore
# EUR-Lex - 12008E/AFI/DCL/06 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008E/AFI/DCL/06

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - DECLARATIONS annexed to the Final Act of the Intergovernmental Conference which adopted the Treaty of Lisbon, signed on 13 December 2007 - A. DECLARATIONS CONCERNING PROVISIONS OF THE TREATIES - 6. Declaration on Article 15(5) and (6), Article 17(6) and (7) and Article 18 of the Treaty on European Union **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0338 - 0338 *

6. Declaration on Article 15(5) and (6), Article 17(6) and (7) and Article 18 of the Treaty on European Union

In choosing the persons called upon to hold the offices of President of the European Council, President of the Commission and High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, due account is to be taken of the need to respect the geographical and demographic diversity of the Union and its Member States.

--------------------------------------------------
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Salon Media Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the “Report”), I, Norman Blashka, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.










/s/
      Norman BlashkaFebruary
      12, 2010
            
            
            Norman BlashkaChief Financial Officer
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 10, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

133855 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices 

v SC: 133855 

 COA: 276163 

Hillsdale CC: 06-301079 

SHAWN JACOB ORT, 06-301080, 06-301081,

Defendant-Appellant. 06-301093, 06-301094 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 23, 2007 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

t0830 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 10, 2007 

 Clerk
EXHIBIT 32.2
                                  ------------


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

         Pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.ss.  1350,  as  created  by  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Robert E. Lester,  Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify:

         1.   The  accompanying  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company
              for the three  months  ended  March 31,  2004 (the "Form  10-QSB")
              fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as
              applicable,  of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
              and

         2.   The information  contained in the 10-QSB fairly  presents,  in all
              material   respects,   the  financial   condition  and  result  of
              operations of the Company.



/s/ Robert E. Lester
--------------------
Robert E. Lester
Chief Financial Officer

Date:    May 17, 2004