alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
i'ruatr nf tf1r luttr~ jtut~a NINETIETH CONGRESS 

FIRST SESSION-Began January 10, 1967 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Prepared under the dh·ection of FRANCIS R. VALEO, Secretary of the Senate 

By GERALD A. HACKETT, Executive Clerk 

Wednesday, March 15, 1967 

UNANIMOUS-CONSENT AGREEMENT 

Ordered, That, effective on Tuesday, March 14, 1967, at the conclusion of any routine morning business 

under order of the Senate, during the further consideration of the treaty Ex. D, 88th Cong., 2d sess., a consular 

convention with the U.S.S.R., debate on Executive Reservation No. 1, intended to be proposed by the Senator 

from South Dakota (Mr. Mundt), shall be limited to 4 hours, to be equally divided and controlled by Mr. Mundt 

and the Senator from Arkansas (Mr. Fulbright) ; debate on Executive Reservation No.2, intended to be proposed 

by Mr. Mundt shall be limited to 6 hours, to be equally divided and controlled by Mr. Mundt and Mr. Fulbright; and debate on Executive Understanding No. 1, intended to be proposed by the Senator from Maine 

(Mrs. Smith), shall be limited to 1 hour, to be equally divided and controlled by Mrs. Smith and Mr. Fulbright. 

(March 9, 1967) 

TREATY 

Date of Calendar Treaty No Subject Action of committee 

repo'i No 

1967 

~ar. 3 11 Ex. D, 88th Cong., Consular convention with the U.S.S.R .••••• Reported favorably by 

2d sess. Mr. Fulbright, from 

the Committee on 

Foreign Relations, 

with a printed report 

together with individual views. (See Ex. 

Rept. No.4, 90th 

Cong., 1st sess.) 

65-022--67--No.22 :r ~ GCVIi.RfUIEHT 'PRIHTIH; OFFICE Ul1
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




The undersigned, Ryan Hart, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of TurkPower Corporation, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
the annual report on Form 10-K of TurkPower Corporation for the period ended May 31, 2012 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of TurkPower Corporation.




Dated: September 17, 2012




/s/ Ryan HartName:  Ryan HartTitle:  Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer(principal executive and accounting officer)




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to TurkPower Corporation and will be retained by TurkPower Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# Eiropas Savienības C 92A/2007

| | ISSN 1725-5201 |
| --- | --- |
| Eiropas Savienības
  Oficiālais Vēstnesis | C 92A |
| | |
| Izdevums latviešu valodā | Informācija un paziņojumi | 50. sējums2007. gada 27. aprīlis |

ISSN 1725-5201

Eiropas Savienības

Oficiālais Vēstnesis

C 92A

Izdevums latviešu valodā

Informācija un paziņojumi

50. sējums2007. gada 27. aprīlis

---

| Paziņojums Nr. | Saturs | Lappuse |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Atzinumi un paziņojumi |
| | ADMINISTRATĪVAS PROCEDŪRAS |
| | Komisija |
| 2007/C 092A/01 | Sludinājums par vakanto Eiropas Dzimumu līdztiesības institūta direktora/-es amatu – (AD 13 pakāpe) – COM/2007/10049 | 1 |

Paziņojums Nr.

Saturs

Lappuse

V   Atzinumi un paziņojumi

ADMINISTRATĪVAS PROCEDŪRAS

Komisija

2007/C 092A/01

Sludinājums par vakanto Eiropas Dzimumu līdztiesības institūta direktora/-es amatu – (AD 13 pakāpe) – COM/2007/10049

1

| LV | |
| --- | --- |

LV

---

V Atzinumi un paziņojumi

ADMINISTRATĪVAS PROCEDŪRAS

Komisija

| 27.4.2007 | LV | Eiropas Savienības Oficiālais Vēstnesis | CA 92/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.4.2007

LV

Eiropas Savienības Oficiālais Vēstnesis

CA 92/1

---

SLUDINĀJUMS PAR VAKANTO EIROPAS DZIMUMU LĪDZTIESĪBAS INSTITŪTA DIREKTORA/-ES AMATU

(AD 13 pakāpe)

COM/2007/10049

(2007/C 92 A/01)

Eiropas Dzimumu līdztiesības institūtam, kurš atrodas Viļņā, vajadzīgs direktors/-e.

Direktoru/-i izraudzīsies Institūta valde, pamatojoties uz Eiropas Komisijas atlasīto un ieteikto kandidātu sarakstu. Viņš/-a tiks pieņemts/-a darbā kā AD 13 pakāpes pagaidu darbinieks/-ce saskaņā ar Eiropas Kopienu pārējo darbinieku nodarbināšanas kārtības 2. panta a) punktu uz piecu gadu termiņu, ko var atjaunot uz vēl vienu termiņu, kas nepārsniedz piecus gadus. Institūts un Komisija piemēro iespēju vienlīdzības politiku.

Kandidātiem/-ēm jābūt Eiropas Savienības dalībvalsts valstspiederīgajiem.

Darba aprakstu, pieteikuma anketas un norādījumus, kā šie pieteikumi jānosūta, var lejupielādēt no šādas interneta adreses:

http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/personnel_administration/working_senior_mgt_en.htm.

Pieteikumu iesniegšanas termiņš ir 2007. gada 4. jūnijs.

---
Editorial Note on Part 7
Editorial Note: The Alphabetical Listing is updated annually by the Office of the Federal Register.

§ 7.50 Chickasaw Recreation Area. ( a ) *Fishing.* Unless otherwise designated, fishing in a manner authorized under applicable State law is allowed on Arbuckle Reservoir and Veterans Lake.
( b ) *Personal watercraft (PWC).* ( 1 ) PWC may operate on Lake of the Arbuckles except in the following closed areas: ( i ) The Goddard Youth Camp Cove.
( ii ) A 150 foot wide zone around the picnic area at the end of Highway 110 known as “The Point”, beginning at the buoy line on the north side of the picnic area and extending south and east into the cove to the east of the picnic area.
( iii ) The cove located directly north of the north branch of F Loop Road.
( iv ) A 150 foot wide zone around the Buckhorn Campground D Loop shoreline.
( 2 ) PWC may not be operated at greater than flat wake speed in the following locations: ( i ) The Guy Sandy arm north of the east/west buoy line located near Masters Pond.
( ii ) The Guy Sandy Cove west of the buoy marking the entrance to the cove.
( iii ) Rock Creek north of the east/west buoy line at approximately 034°27′50′′ North Latitude.
( iv ) The Buckhorn Ramp bay, east of the north south line drawn from the Buckhorn Boat Ramp Breakwater Dam.
( v ) A 150 foot wide zone along the north shore of the Buckhorn Creek arm starting at the north end of the Buckhorn Boat Ramp Breakwater Dam and continuing southeast to the Buckhorn Campground D Loop beach.
( vi ) The cove south and east of Buckhorn Campground C and D Loops.
( vii ) The cove located east of Buckhorn Campground B Loop and adjacent to Buckhorn Campground A Loop.
( viii ) The second cove east of Buckhorn Campground B Loop, fed by a creek identified as Dry Branch.
( ix ) Buckhorn Creek east of the east/west buoy line located at approximately 096°59′3.50′′ Longitude, known as the G Road Cliffs area.
( x ) Within 150 feet of all persons, docks, boat launch ramps, vessels at anchor, vessels from which people are fishing, and shoreline areas near campgrounds.
( 3 ) PWC may only be launched from the following boat ramps: ( i ) Buckhorn boat ramp.
( ii ) The Point boat ramp.
( iii ) Guy Sandy boat ramp.
( iv ) Upper Guy Sandy boat ramp.
( 4 ) The fueling of PWC is prohibited on the water surface. Fueling is allowed only while the PWC is away from the water surface and on a trailer.
( 5 ) The Superintendent may temporarily limit, restrict or terminate access to the areas designated for PWC use after taking into consideration public health and safety, natural and cultural resource protection, and other management activities and objectives.
[49 FR 18451, Apr. 30, 1984, as amended at 69 FR 53640, Sept. 2, 2004]
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by
reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-139857) of Idearc Inc. of our report dated March 6, 2007, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Idearc Inc. and subsidiaries included in the
Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2006.



|              |  |                      
|------------- |  | ---------------------
|              |  | /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
|              | 
|Dallas, Texas |  |                      
|March 6, 2007 |  |
§ 101.36 Changes or cancellations of priority ratings and rated orders. ( a ) The priority rating on a rated order may be changed or canceled by: ( 1 ) An official action of HHS; or
( 2 ) Written notification from the person who placed the rated order (including a Delegate Agency).
( b ) If an unrated order is amended to make it a rated order, or a DO rating is changed to a DX rating, the supplier must give the appropriate preferential treatment to the order as of the date the change is received by the supplier.
( c ) An amendment to a rated order that significantly alters a supplier's original production or delivery schedule shall constitute a new rated order as of the date of its receipt. The supplier must accept or reject the amended order according to the provisions of § 101.33.
( d ) The following amendments do not constitute a new rated order: a change in shipping destination; a reduction in the total amount of the order; an increase in the total amount of the order which has negligible impact upon deliveries; a minor variation in size or design (prior to the start of production); or a change which is agreed upon between the supplier and the customer.
( e ) If a person no longer needs items or services to fill a rated order, any rated orders placed with suppliers for the items or services, or the priority rating on those orders, must be canceled.
( f ) When a priority rating is added to an unrated order, or is changed or canceled, all suppliers must be promptly notified in writing.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,  Paul  G.  Carter,  certify,  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report  on Form 10-QSB of Custom Branded Networks, Inc. for the quarterly period
ending  September 30, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or  15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934 and that the information
contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material
respects  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of Custom Branded
Networks,  Inc.

Date:   November  13,  2003

By:   /s/ Paul G. Carter
      ------------------------------------------
      Paul  G.  Carter
      Principal  Executive  Officer
      Principal  Financial  Officer
#### § 1080.1 Scope.

This part applies to the Emergency Community Services Homeless Grant Program.
§ 328.3 References. ( a ) Title 36 CFR, part 327, Rules and Regulations Governing Public Use of Water Resource Development Projects Administered by the Chief of Engineers (38 FR 7552, March 23, 1973).
( b ) ER 1105-2-507.
( c ) ER 1130-2-400.
( d ) ER 1145-2-301.
( e ) ER 1145-2-303.
( f ) ER 1165-2-400.
( g ) ER 405-2-800 Series.
836 P.2d 571

#### STATE of Idaho, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Roxy Anna YATES, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 19697.

Court of Appeals of Idaho.

Aug. 28, 1992.

Alan Trimming, Ada County Public Defender, Amil Myshin, Deputy Public Defender, Boise, for defendant-appellant.

Larry EehoHawk, Atty. Gen., Myrna A.I. Stahman, Deputy Atty. Gen., Boise, for plaintiff-respondent.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order denying a motion under I.C.R. 35 to reduce a unified sentence imposed for robbery. The appellant, Roxy Anna Yates, was sentenced to the custody of the Board of Correction for an indeterminate term of life with a minimum period of confinement of ten years. We affirm.

The appellant pled guilty to the robbery of a bank in Boise. She was 42 years old and had an extensive prior criminal record. At the sentencing proceeding, it was indicated to the judge that the reason Yates committed the crime was so she could reenter the penitentiary, where she felt more comfortable than living outside a penal facility. In determining an appropriate sentence, the court considered the sentencing goals of protection of society, deterrence, retribution and rehabilitation. *See State v. Toohill,*103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct.App.1982). Several weeks after the sentence was imposed and the judgment of conviction was entered, Yates moved for a reduction of her sentence. Her motion was summarily denied by the court without further hearing. The court noted that “[t]he *626matters relevant for sentencing were considered by the court. There is no additional information in support of the motion that would cause the court to reconsider the sentence.”

Because Yates’ motion was not filed within time to preserve an appeal from the judgment of conviction and sentence, we will not conduct a direct review of the court’s sentencing discretion. I.A.R. 14. We can only review the exercise of the court’s discretion in arriving at its decision to deny the Rule 35 motion.

Where a sentence is not challenged as to its legality, a Rule 35 motion is a plea for leniency, addressed to the sound discretion of the sentencing court. *State v. Forde,*113 Idaho 21, 740 P.2d 63 (Ct.App.1987). The question on appeal is whether the facts in the record show that the court abused its discretion in refusing to grant the leniency requested. *State v. Wright,*114 Idaho 451, 757 P.2d 714 (Ct.App.1988). In this case, no supplemental information was submitted with Yates’ motion to reduce her sentence. The sentence was within the limit which could have been imposed for robbery. I.C. § 18-6503. The sentence was also reasonable in light of the offense, the character of the offender, and the sentencing criteria. In the absence of any factual information to support Yates’ motion, beyond the record existing when she was initially sentenced, we are unable to conclude that the district court abused its discretion by denying the motion to modify the sentence. *State v. Sutton,*106 Idaho 403, 679 P.2d 680 (Ct.App.1984).

Accordingly, the order denying the motion for reduction of sentence is affirmed.
#### § 9.300 Purpose.

These regulations govern the conduct of the mineral resource assessment activities authorized under § 1010 of the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act (ANILCA), 16 U.S.C. 3101, *et seq.,* in units of the National Park System in Alaska. The regulations are designed to ensure that authorized Federal agencies and their contractors carry out mineral resource assessment activities in an environmentally sound manner that does not result in lasting environmental impacts that appreciably alter the natural character of the units, or biological or ecological systems in the units; is compatible with the purposes for which the units are established; and ensures that all units are left unimpaired and preserved for the enjoyment of present and future generations.
# Euroopan unionin C 92A/27.

| | ISSN 1725-2490 |
| --- | --- |
| Euroopan unionin
  virallinen lehti | C 92A |
| | |
| Suomenkielinen laitos | Tiedonantoja ja ilmoituksia | 50. vuosikerta27. huhtikuu 2007 |

ISSN 1725-2490

Euroopan unionin

virallinen lehti

C 92A

Suomenkielinen laitos

Tiedonantoja ja ilmoituksia

50. vuosikerta27. huhtikuu 2007

---

| Ilmoitusnumero | Sisältö | Sivu |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Ilmoitukset |
| | HALLINNOLLISET MENETTELYT |
| | Komissio |
| 2007/C 092A/01 | Ilmoitus avoinna olevasta Euroopan tasa-arvoinstituutin johtajan virasta — (palkkaluokka AD 13) — COM/2007/10049 | 1 |

Ilmoitusnumero

Sisältö

Sivu

V   Ilmoitukset

HALLINNOLLISET MENETTELYT

Komissio

2007/C 092A/01

Ilmoitus avoinna olevasta Euroopan tasa-arvoinstituutin johtajan virasta — (palkkaluokka AD 13) — COM/2007/10049

1

| FI | |
| --- | --- |

FI

---

V Ilmoitukset

HALLINNOLLISET MENETTELYT

Komissio

| 27.4.2007 | FI | Euroopan unionin virallinen lehti | CA 92/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.4.2007

FI

Euroopan unionin virallinen lehti

CA 92/1

---

ILMOITUS AVOINNA OLEVASTA EUROOPAN TASA-ARVOINSTITUUTIN JOHTAJAN VIRASTA

(palkkaluokka AD 13)

COM/2007/10049

(2007/C 92 A/01)

Euroopan tasa-arvoinstituutti hakee johtajaa. Instituutin toimipaikka on Vilnassa.

Instituutin hallintoneuvosto nimittää johtajan Euroopan komission valitsemien hakijoiden luettelosta. Johtaja nimitetään Euroopan yhteisöjen muuhun henkilöstöön sovellettavien palvelussuhteen ehtojen 2 artiklan a alakohdassa tarkoitetuksi väliaikaiseksi toimihenkilöksi palkkaluokkaan AD 13. Johtajan toimikausi on viisi vuotta, ja sitä voidaan jatkaa toisella enintään viisi vuotta kestävällä toimikaudella. Instituutti ja komissio noudattavat henkilöstöpolitiikassaan tasa-arvoperiaatetta.

Hakijoiden on oltava jonkin Euroopan unionin jäsenvaltion kansalaisia.

Toimenkuvauksen, hakulomakkeen ja hakemuksen lähettämistä koskevat ohjeet voi ladata Internet-osoitteesta

http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/personnel_administration/working_senior_mgt_en.htm.

Hakemusten on oltava perillä viimeistään 4. kesäkuuta 2007.

---
#### § 71.12 Enforcement.

Persons authorized by the heads of the appropriate bureaus to enforce these regulations may arrest any person who violates these rules and regulations within areas under the administration or authority of such bureau head with a warrant or, if the offense is committed in his presence, without a warrant. Any violations of the rules and regulations issued in this part, except those in § 71.15, shall be punishable by a fine of not more than $100.
#### § 805.6 Interagency cooperation.

The Council shall consult with appropriate Federal and non-Federal agencies and with interested private persons and organizations when it is considering actions involving such parties and requiring environmental assessments. Where other Federal agencies are involved in the proposed action, the Council shall cooperate in the required environmental assessment and the preparation of necessary environmental documents. Where appropriate as determined by the nature and extent of Council involvement in the proposed action, the Council shall assume the status of lead agency.
§ 1149.31 Can the reviewing official or the ALJ be disqualified? ( a ) A reviewing official or an ALJ may disqualify himself or herself at any time.
( b ) Upon motion of any party, the reviewing official or ALJ may be disqualified as follows: ( 1 ) The motion must be supported by an affidavit containing specific facts establishing that personal bias or other reason for disqualification exists, including the time and circumstances of the discovery of such facts;
( 2 ) The motion must be filed promptly after discovery of the grounds for disqualification or the objection will be deemed waived; and
( 3 ) The party, or representative of record, must certify in writing that the motion is made in good faith.
( c ) Once a motion has been filed to disqualify the reviewing official or the ALJ, the ALJ will halt the proceedings until resolving the matter of disqualification. If the ALJ determines that the reviewing official is disqualified, the ALJ will dismiss the complaint without prejudice. If the ALJ disqualifies himself/herself, the case will be promptly reassigned to another ALJ. However, if the ALJ denies a motion to disqualify, the matter will be determined by the authority head only during his/her review of the initial decision on appeal.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

November 16, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-20151

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

AGUSTIN CARRILLO-BANUELOS,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:03-CR-236-ALL

--------------------

Before GARZA, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Agustin Carrillo-Banuelos pleaded guilty to unlawful reentry

of a deported alien in violation of § 1326(a) and (b)(2), and was

sentenced to 70 months of imprisonment to be followed by three

years of supervised release. The district court imposed the

condition of supervised release that Carrillo-Banuelos “shall not

possess a firearm, destructive device, or any other dangerous

weapon.” Carrillo-Banuelos argues that this condition must be

vacated because it is vague and overbroad. 
No. 04-20151

-2-

Conditions of probation must be written and read in a

“commonsense way.” United States v. Paul, 274 F.3d 155, 167 (5th

Cir. 2001). A commonsense reading of the condition requires that

the intent to cause harm be present before an instrument which is

not dangerous when used in its customary manner may be found to

be a dangerous weapon. Carrillo-Banuelos has not shown that the

district court erred by imposing the condition. 

For the first time on appeal, Carrillo-Banuelos argues,

pursuant to Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), that the

“felony” and “aggravated felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326(b)(1) and (2) are elements of the offense, not sentence

enhancements, making those provisions unconstitutional. He

concedes that this argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v.

United States, 523 U.S. 224 (1998), but raises it for possible

review by the Supreme Court. 

Carrillo-Banuelos also argues that his sentence violates

Blakely v. Washington, 124 S. Ct. 2531 (2004), because it is

based on facts not admitted or found by a jury. As he concedes,

this argument is foreclosed by United States v. Pineiro, 377 F.3d

464, 465-66 (5th Cir.), petition for cert. filed, (July 14, 2004)

(No. 04-5263).

AFFIRMED.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDG MENT

No. 04

- 24

- 00190

- CV

Oscar A. MIRANDA

, Appellant

v.

Karen PENA

, Appellee

From the County Court a t Law No. 10

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2024CV01721

Honorable David J. Rodriguez

, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE CHAPA

, JUSTICE RIOS , AND JUSTICE WATKINS

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED FOR

WANT OF PROSECUTION. Costs are taxed against appellant Oscar A. Miranda.

SIGNED July 17, 2024.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa , Justice
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Yak Communications (USA), Inc. (the
Company) Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the three months ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Charles Zwebner, Chief Executive Officer and
principal financial officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1). | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2). | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  | 
|----------------------- |  |  | 
|Date: November 14, 2003 |  |  | 
|                        |  |  | 
|                        |  |  |