alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 18.7 How are lease proposals solicited and selected if the Director issues a Request for Bids? ( a ) If the amount of the rent is the only criterion for award of a lease, the Director may solicit bids through issuance of a request for bids as described in this section. If historic property is to be leased under the authority of this section, the Director must comply with 36 CFR part 800 (commenting procedures of the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation) at an appropriate time during the leasing process.
( b ) A request for bids under this section shall be advertised by public notice published at least twice in local and/or national newspapers of general circulation. The notice shall provide at least a thirty (30) day period from the last date of publication for the submission of sealed bids. The notice will provide necessary information to prospective bidders. It may specify a minimum rent and/or require submission of a rent deposit or advance rent payment. Bids will be considered only if timely received at the place designated in the request. Bids must be in the form specified by the Director, or, if no form is specified, a bid must be in writing, signed by the bidder or authorized representative, state the amount of the bid, and refer to the applicable public notice. If the notice requires submission of a rent deposit or advance rent payment, the bids must include the required funds in the form of a certified check, post office money order, bank drafts, or cashier's checks made out to the United States of America. The bid (and payment where applicable) must be enclosed in a sealed envelope upon which the bidder shall write: “Bid on lease of property of the National Park Service” and shall note the date the bids are to be opened.
( c ) Bids will be opened publicly by the Director at a time and place specified in the public notice. Bidders or their representatives may attend the bid opening. The bidder submitting a responsive bid offering the highest rent will be selected for award of the lease (subject to a determination of financial capability by the Director). A responsive bid is a bid that meets the material terms and conditions of the request for bids. The Director shall accept no bid in an amount less than the fair market rental value as determined by the Director. If two or more bids are equal, a drawing shall make the lease award by lot limited to the equal responsive bids received.
( d ) When a property is to be leased through a request for bids, the bidder that is declared by the Director to be the high bidder shall be bound by his bid and this part to execute the offered lease, unless the bid is rejected. If the declared high bidder fails to enter into the lease for any reason, the Director may choose to enter into the lease with the next highest bidder (if that bidder offered to pay at least the fair market rent value). The Director may reject any and all bids in his discretion and resolicit or cancel a lease solicitation under this part at any time without liability to any person.
§ 51.66 Under what conditions will a concessioner obtain a leasehold surrender interest in existing real property improvements in which no leasehold surrender interest exists? ( a ) A concession contract may require the concessioner to replace fixtures in real property improvements in which there is no leasehold surrender interest (e.g., fixtures attached to an existing government facility assigned by the Director to the concessioner). A leasehold surrender interest will be obtained by the concessioner in such fixtures subject to the approval and determination of construction cost and other conditions contained in this part.
( b ) A concession contract may require the concessioner to undertake a major rehabilitation of a structure in which there is no leasehold surrender interest (*e.g.,* a government-constructed facility assigned to the concessioner). Upon substantial completion of the major rehabilitation, the concessioner will obtain a leasehold surrender interest in the structure. The initial construction cost of this leasehold surrender interest will be the construction cost of the major rehabilitation. Depreciation for purposes of leasehold surrender interest value will apply only to the rehabilitated components of the related structure.
# IE  Table 1

&"Arial,Bold"&10&KFF0000This table was published on 4/3/15.
-----Original Message-----

From: Vineyard, Christine 

Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2014 9:13 AM

To: Steckel, Andrew; Tharp, Lisa

Cc: Wehling, Jefferson

Subject: RE: Docket Number EPA-R09-OAR-2014-0469 (UNCLASSIFIED)

Andy,

I just spoke to Mr. Brandon and he's aware that rule R18-2-727 was not 

in the notice we just had published. He wanted us to know that there 

are problems with the rule. I suggested he let ADEQ know his concerns 

when the rule is revised in 2015.

Christine

-----Original Message-----

From: Brandon, Michael W CIV USARMY USAG (US) 

[mailto:michael.w.brandon6.civ@mail.mil]

Sent: Monday, October 20, 2014 10:18 AM

To: Steckel, Andrew

Cc: Ruerup, Charles F Jr CIV (US)

Subject: Docket Number EPA-R09-OAR-2014-0469 (UNCLASSIFIED)

Classification: UNCLASSIFIED

Caveats: NONE

Mr. Steckel;

The proposed revisions to the ADEQ SIP seems to have excluded the 

rescission or substantial rewrite of R18-2-727 Spray Painting 

operations. The ADEQ presently enforces this rule for particulate 

control even though their enforcement guidance specifically states that 
the rule is intended to control VOC. As a VOC rule it is not enforceable 

and not well defined because "96% control" is a moving target 

dependant on transfer efficiency and VOC content. The better the 

transfer efficiency and the lower the VOC content, the more 

unachievable and untenable this rule becomes. Although the 

architectural coating rule is better understood, and the evaluation of 

photo-chemically reactive solvents is arcane.

It would seem that NSPS and Major/Area source MACT would be 

suitable for taking care of present day spray painting operations. If 96% 

control of

overspray(???) is used, it is more stringent that the rules that were 

approved for the Maricopa County Ozone non-attainment area 

(attached). Is it not a law that a nonattainment SIP cannot be any less 

stringent that the Statewide attainment SIP??

I propose that R18-2-727 be added to the list for rescission, or the rule 

returned to ADEQ for rewrite to be at least as explicit as the Maricopa 

County rule.

Thank you for your time.

Michael W. Brandon

Environmental Engineer

Environmental Sciences Division

US Army Garrison Yuma Proving Ground

IMYM-PWE

301 C Street

Yuma, AZ 85365

928-328-6342

Interactive Customer Evaluation Link for Service Comment
http://ice.disa.mil/index.cfm?fa=card&sp=94764&s=546&dep=*DoD&s

c=5

Classification: UNCLASSIFIED

Caveats: NONE
# EUR-Lex - 12002E161 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 12002E161

**Treaty establishing the European Community (Nice consolidated version) - Part Three: Community policies - Title XVII: Economic and social cohesion - Article 161 - Article 130d - EC Treaty (Maastricht consolidated version) - **

*
Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0104 - 0104 Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0251 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0050 - Consolidated version *

Treaty establishing the European Community (Nice consolidated version)

Part Three: Community policies

Title XVII: Economic and social cohesion

Article 161

Article 130d - EC Treaty (Maastricht consolidated version)

Article 161

Without prejudice to Article 162, the Council, acting unanimously on a proposal from the Commission and after obtaining the assent of the European Parliament and consulting the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, shall define the tasks, priority objectives and the organisation of the Structural Funds, which may involve grouping the Funds. The Council, acting by the same procedure, shall also define the general rules applicable to them and the provisions necessary to ensure their effectiveness and the coordination of the Funds with one another and with the other existing Financial Instruments.

A Cohesion Fund set up by the Council in accordance with the same procedure shall provide a financial contribution to projects in the fields of environment and trans-European networks in the area of transport infrastructure.

From 1 January 2007, the Council shall act by a qualified majority on a proposal from the Commission after obtaining the assent of the European Parliament and after consulting the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions if, by that date, the multiannual financial perspective applicable from 1 January 2007 and the Interinstitutional Agreement relating thereto have been adopted. If such is not the case, the procedure laid down by this paragraph shall apply from the date of their adoption.
SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

ONE HUNDREDTH CONGRESS

Convened January 6, 1987

FIRST SESSION {

SECOND SESSION {

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR

Wednesday, October 14, 1987

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF WALTER J . STEWART, 

SECRETARY OF THE SENATE

By Gerald A. Hackett, Executive Cleric
1

TREATIES

Calendar

No.

Treaty 

Doc. No.

Subject Reported

By

1 EX.

N(A).

94-2

Treaty with the Union of Soviet Socialist 

Republics on the Limitation of Underground 

Nuclear Weapon Tests, and the Protocol 

thereto (Threshold Test Ban Treaty).

Feb 27 87 Reported 

favorably, with a 

resolution of advice and 

consent to ratification 

with a reservation and a 

declaration, by Mr. Pell, 

Committee on Foreign 

Relations (Printed Report 

together with additional 

views—Ex. Rept. 100-1)

2 EX.

N(B).

94-2

Treaty with the Union of Soviet Socialist 

Republics on Underground Nuclear 

Explosions for Peaceful Purposes, and the 

Protocol thereto (Peaceful Nuclear 

Explosions Treaty).

Feb 27 87 Reported 

favorably, with a 

resolution of advice and 

consent to ratification 

with a reservation and a 

declaration, by Mr. Pell, 

Committee on Foreign 

Relations (Printed report 

together with additional 

views—Ex. Rept. 100-1)

NOMINATIONS

Calendar Message Nominee, Office, And Predecessor Reported

No. No. Bv

THE JUDICIARY

218 191 Royce C. Lamberth, of Virginia, to be Jun 23, 87 Mr. Biden,

United States District Judge for the Committee on the Judiciary,

District of Columbia vice Barrington D. 

Parker, retired.

without printed report.
2

Calendar

No.

Message

No.

Nominee, Office, And Predecessor Reported

____________ JJL____________

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

308 318 Robert H. Edmunds, Jr., of North Carolina, 

to be United States Attorney for the 

Middle District of North Carolina for the 

term of four years vice Kenneth W. 

McAllister, resigned.

Jul 31, 87 Mr. Biden, 

Committee on the Judiciary, 

without printed report. ’

309 319 Jesse R. Jenkins, of North Carolina, to be 

United States Marshal for the Western 

District of North Carolina for the term of 

four years vice Max E. Wilson, resigned.

Do.

[NEW REPORTS]

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED 

STATES

364

* Q/nrti

487

c nrtmn! t

Robert H. Bork, of the District of 

Columbia, to be an Associate Justice of 

the Supreme Court of the United States, 

vice Lewis F. Powell, Jr., retired.

M x _____..................

Oct 13, 87 Mr. Biden, 

Committee on the Judiciary, 

unfavorably with printed 

report with additional 

views - Ex.Rept. 100-7.

constituted committee of the Senate.
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 189 (Friday, September 29, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 57485]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-8363]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Defense Science Board

AGENCY: Department of Defense.

ACTION: Notice of Advisory Committee Meetings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Science Board Task Force on Directed Energy will 
meet in closed session on September 28, 2006, at the Institute for 
Defense Analysis, 1801 N. Beauregard Street, Alexandria, VA. The task 
force will review directed energy weapon systems and technology 
applications.
    The mission of the Defense Science Board is to advise the Secretary 
of Defense and the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, 
Technology & Logistics on scientific and technical matters as they 
affect the perceived needs of the Department of Defense. At these 
meetings, the Defense Science Board Task Force will: Review all 
surface, sub-surface, air and space DE programs in The Department and 
other organizations; examine recent supporting technology advancements 
and their applications with respect to supporting military DE weapon 
system developments; as well as make recommendations on potential 
strategic advantage DE weapons can provide with regards to the delivery 
of precision effects, decreased collateral damage, limiting unintended 
effects, and decreasing post combat reconstitution costs and efforts.
    In accordance with Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act, Pub L. 92-463, as amended (5 U.S.C. App. II), it has been 
determined that these Defense Science Board Task Force meetings concern 
matters listed in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1) and that, accordingly, the 
meeting will be closed to the public.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Major Chad Lominac, USAF, Defense 
Science Board, 3140 Defense Pentagon, Room 3C553, Washington, DC 20301-
3140, via e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d0b3b8b1a2bcb5a3febcbfbdb9beb1b390bfa3b4febdb9bc"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="33505b52415f56401d5f5c5e5a5d5250735c40571d5e5a5f">[email protected]</span></a> or via phone at (703) 571-
0081.
    Due to scheduling difficulties, there is insufficient time to 
provide timely notice required by Section 10(a) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act and Subsection 102-3.150(b) of the GSA Final Rule on 
Federal Advisory Committee Management, 41 CFR Part 102-3.150(b), which 
further requires publication at least 15 calendar days prior to the 
meeting.

    Dated: September 25, 2006.
C.R. Choate,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 06-8363 Filed 9-28-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
§ 79.16 Objecting to a determination of disposition of particular material remains. Anyone may object to and request in writing that the Departmental Consulting Archeologist review a Federal Agency Official's determination to dispose of material remains within 60 days of publication of the notice of determination of disposition in the Federal Register. The objection must document why the objector disagrees with the Federal Agency Official's decision regarding the disposal. The procedure for objecting to a determination of disposition is as follows: ( a ) The objection must be sent to the Departmental Consulting Archeologist. The Departmental Consulting Archeologist must forward a copy of the objection within 5 days of receipt to the Federal Agency Official who made the determination under objection. The Federal Agency Official must halt the planned disposition until the Departmental Consulting Archeologist completes the requested review.
( b ) The Departmental Consulting Archeologist must review the objection, and the Federal Agency Official's determination of disposition in § 79.15(i)(2).
( c ) The Departmental Consulting Archeologist must consult with the objecting party or parties and the Federal Agency Official with the aim of resolving the objection.
( d ) Within 60 days of receipt of the objection, whether or not a formal resolution has been agreed upon, the Departmental Consulting Archeologist must transmit to the Federal Agency Official a non-binding recommendation, including a thorough explanation, for further consideration.
( e ) The Federal Agency Official must consider the recommendation of the Departmental Consulting Archeologist prior to making a decision on the objection. Within 30 days of receipt of the recommendation, the Federal Agency Official must respond to the Departmental Consulting Archeologist and the objector with a decision on the objection and a justification for that decision. The decision document must include any information about administrative appeal rights required by internal agency appeal procedures or a statement that the decision document is a final agency action under the Administrative Procedure Act, as appropriate.
( f ) The Federal Agency Official must publish notice of the decision on the objection and any amendments made to the determination of disposition in the Federal Register. This may only be done after the objector exhausts any internal appeal procedures identified in the decision document sent to the objector under § 79.16(e). Publication of the notice of the decision on the objection constitutes a final agency action under the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 704).
§ 223.137 Causes for debarment. The debarring official may debar a purchaser for any of the following causes: ( a ) Conviction of or civil judgment for: ( 1 ) Theft, forgery, bribery, embezzlement, falsification or destruction of records, making false statements, or receiving stolen property;
( 2 ) Fraud, a criminal offense, or violation of Federal or State antitrust laws, any of which occurred in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a public contract or subcontract.
( 3 ) Any other offense indicating a lack of business integrity or honesty that seriously and directly affects the present responsibility of the purchaser.
( b ) A purchaser's debarment from the purchase of timber by another Federal agency which sells timber.
( c ) Cutting and/or removal of more than incidental volumes of timber not designated for the purchaser's cutting from a national forest.
( d ) Substantial violation of the terms of one or more Forest Service timber sale contracts so serious as to justify debarment, such as: ( 1 ) Willful failure to perform in accordance with contract; or
( 2 ) A history of failure to perform contract terms; or of unsatisfactory performance of contract terms.
( e ) Among actions the Forest Service regards as so serious as to justify debarment under paragraph (d) of this section are willful violation or repeated failure to perform National Forest System timber sale contract provisions relating to the following: ( 1 ) Fire suppression, fire prevention, and the disposal of slash;
( 2 ) Protection of soil, water, wildlife, range, cultural, and timber resources and protection of improvements when such failure causes significant environmental, resource, or improvements damage;
( 3 ) Removal of designated timber when such failure causes substantial product deterioration or conditions favorable to insect epidemics;
( 4 ) Observance of restrictions on exportation of timber;
( 5 ) Observance of restrictions on the disposal of timber from small business set-aside sales;
( 6 ) Providing access to the Forest Service upon its request to purchaser's books and accounts;
( 7 ) Payment of monies due under terms of a Forest Service timber sale contract, including payment of damages relating to failure to cut designated timber by the contract termination date;
( 8 ) Performance of contract by the contract termination date.
( f ) Any other cause so serious or compelling that if affects the present responsibility of a purchaser of Government timber.
( g ) Violation of the Forest Resources Conservation and Shortage Relief Act of 1990 (16 U.S.C. 620, *et seq.*) (Act) or any regulation or contract issued under the Act.
[52 FR 43329, Nov. 12, 1987, as amended at 60 FR 46921, Sept. 8, 1995]
§ 251.110 Scope and application. ( a ) The regulations in this subpart set forth the procedures by which landowners may apply for access across National Forest System lands and the terms and conditions that govern any special use or other authorization that is issued by the Forest Service to permit such access.
( b ) These regulations apply to access across all National Forest System lands, including Congressionally designated areas, and supplement the regulations in subpart B of this part, and in parts 212 and 293 of this chapter. The regulations of this subpart do not affect rights-of-way established under authority of R.S. 2477 (43 U.S.C. 932); rights-of-way transferred to States under 23 U.S.C. 317; access rights outstanding in third parties at the time the United States acquired the land; or the rights reserved in conveyances to the United States and in other easements granted by an authorized officer of the Forest Service. Except for the aforementioned rights-of-way, currently valid special-use authorizations will become subject to the rules of this subpart upon expiration, termination, reversion, modification, or reauthorization.
( c ) Subject to the terms and conditions contained in this part and in parts 212 and 293 of this chapter, as appropriate, landowners shall be authorized such access as the authorized officer deems to be adequate to secure them the reasonable use and enjoyment of their land.
( d ) ln those cases where a landowner's ingress or egress across National Forest System lands would require surface disturbance or would require the use of Government-owned roads, trails, or transportation facilities not authorized for general public use, the landowner must apply for and receive a special-use or road-use authorization documenting the occupancy and use authorized on National Forest System lands or facilities and identifying the landowner's rights, privileges, responsibilities, and obligations.
( e ) Where ingress and egress will require the use of existing Government-owned roads, trails, or other transportation facilities which are open and available for general public use, use by the landowner shall be in accordance with the provisions of part 212 of this chapter.
( f ) The rules of this subpart do not apply to access within conservation system units in Alaska which are subject to title XI of the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act (16 U.S.C. 3101), except for access to inholdings authorized by section 1110(b) of that Act.
( g ) Where there is existing access or a right of access to a property over non-National Forest land or over public roads that is adequate or that can be made adequate, there is no obligation to grant additional access through National Forest System lands.