alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

# ACTION:

Announcement of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces the fifth meeting of the American Health Information Community Confidentiality, Privacy and Security Workgroup in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.)

# DATES:

November 13, 2006, from 1 p.m. to 4 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

Mary C. Switzer Building (330 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20201), Conference Room 4090 (please bring photo ID for entry to a Federal building).

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

*http://www.hhs.gov/​healthit/​ahic/​cps_​main.html*.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Workgroup members will continue to discuss the issues surrounding identity proofing and user authentication in preparation for the December 12th American Health Information Community meeting.

                    The meeting will be available via Web cast at                     *http://www.hhs.gov/​healthit/​ahic/​cps_​instruct.html*.                

Dated: October 17, 2006.

Judith Sparrow,

Director, American Health Information Community, Office of Programs and Coordination, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology.

[FR Doc. 06-8859 Filed 10-24-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4150-24-M
#### § 1150.3 What other regulations also apply to the Endowment's debt collection efforts?

All provisions of the Federal Claims Collection Standards also apply to the regulations in this part. This part supplements the Federal Claims Collection Standards by prescribing procedures and directives necessary and appropriate for operations of the Endowment.
Date of 

report 

----

1969 

No\ 12 

iruatr nf tqt luittb itatts 

NINETY-FIRST CONGRESS 

FIRST SESSION {Convened January 3, 196g 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Prepared under the direction of FRANCIS R. VALEO, Secretary of the Senate 

By GERALD A. HACKETT, Executive Clerk 

Thursday, November 13, 1969 

NOMINATION 

Calendar Message Name of nommee Office Predecessor 

No. No. 

SUPREME COURT OF 

THE UNITED STATES 

677 610 Clement F Ha' DS'II orth, An Assoc1ate Justice of the Reported favorably bv 

Jr, of South Carobna Supreme Comt of the l\:lr Hruska, from 

Umted State., the Committee on 

the Judiciary, with 

mdlvidual viev.'> 

(See Ex Rept 

91-12, 91st Cong, 

1st sess) 

37-G22-69-No 104 

U S GCVERHMEHT PRINTING OFFICE 1969
SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

ONE HUNDRED FIRST CONGRESS 

FIRST SESSION { 

Convened January 3, 1989 

Adjourned November 22, 1989 

Convened January 23, 1990 

SECOND SESSION { 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

FINAL ISSUE 

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF WALTER J.STEWART, 

SECRETARY OF THE SENATE 

By Gerald A. Hackett, Executive Clerk 
NOTE ON TREATIES AND NOMINATIONS 

NOTE:Treaties remaining on the Executive Calendar are, under the rules of the Senate, 

automatically rereferred to the Committee on Foreign Relations at the sine die 

adjournment of the Senate, and remain pending in committee for action in subsequent 

Congresses. All nominations still pending in the Senate, under the rules of the Senate, 

failed of confirmation at the time of the sine die adjournment of the 101st Congress and 

are returned to the President, and must be resubmitted in the next Congress to be further 

considered. 
1 

TREATIES 

Calendar Treaty Subject Reported 

No. Doc. No. Bv 

11 EX. B., Two Related Protocols to the Convention for Jun 28 90 Reported 

95-1 the Unification of Certain Rules Relating favorably by Mr. Pell, 

to International Carriage by Air, as Committee on Foreign 

Amended (Montreal Aviation Protocols Nos. Relations, with a 

3 and 4). resolution of advice and 

consent to ratification 

with certain conditions 

(Printed report-Ex. Rept 

101-21 together with 

minoritv views).
**EXHIBIT
        10.66**
  **AMENDMENT
        TO EXCLUSIVE FIELD OF USE LICENSE AGREEMENT AND PRODUCT SALE
        AGREEMENT**
  This
        is
        an Amendment to the Exclusive Field of Use License Agreement dated September
        16,
        2004 ("Agreement") by and between Tasker Capital Corp., Wynn Starr Special
        Products, LLC, Pharlo Citrus Technologies, Inc., and Indian River Labs, LLC.
        This Amendment is effective retroactively to March 18, 2005.
  The
        parties to this Amendment are Tasker Capital Corp. ("Tasker"), Wynn Starr
        Special Products, LLC, Pharlo Citrus Technologies, Inc. ("PCTI"), Pharlo
        IP, LLC
        ("Pharlo IP") and Indian River Labs, LLC ("IRL"). The parties hereby agree
        to
        the following changes to the Agreement:
  1. In
        the
        first paragraph, replace "Sections 2(b) and 12(g)" with, "Sections 2(b),
        4(c)
        and 11(g), Pharlo IP, LLC ("Pharlo IP") and".
  2. In
        the
        second paragraph, delete "and subsequently assigned to Pharlo".
  3. In
        the
        third paragraph, replace "Pharlo is the owner of all right, title and interest
        in and to" with, "Pharlo and Pharlo IP, collectively, own or are exclusively
        licensed under".
  4. In
        the
        fourth paragraph, change the Licensed Territory to "Worldwide".
  5. In
        Section 4 Royalty
        Payments ,
        part
        (c), replace "Pharlo" with "Pharlo IP and PCTI, collectively,".
  6. In
        Section 10 Identification
        of Patent ,
        the
        notice to be affixed to the packaging of each Licensed Product shall read
        "Licensed under U.S. Patent Nos. 5,989,595 and 6,242,011," adding any future
        patent numbers as applicable.
  IN
        WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment by their
        duly
        authorized officers or representatives.
  **Tasker
                  Capital Corp.**
                
                By:
                  /s/ James Burns
                James
                  Burns
              **Pharlo
                  Citrus Technologies, Inc.**
                
                By:
                  /s/ David L. Dickinson
                David
                  L. Dickinson**Wynn
                  Starr Special Products, LLC**
                
                By:
                  /s/ Steven B. Zavagli
                Steven
                  B. Zavagli
              **Pharlo
                  IP, LLC**
                
                By:
                    /s/ David L. Dickinson
                  David
                    L. Dickinson**Indian
                  River Labs, LLC**
                
                By:
                    /s/ David L. Dickinson
                  David
                    L.
                    Dickinson
Order entered October 21, 2022

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-22-00406-CR

No. 05-22-00407-CR

No. 05-22-00408-CR

No. 05-22-00409-CR

No. 05-22-00410-CR

No. 05-22-00411-CR

SALVADOR VAZQUEZ CISNEROS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 6

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. F13-12685-X, F13-12681-X, F13-12684-X,

F13-12686-X, F13-12682-X & F13-12687-X

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s October 18, 2022 second motion to extend 

the time to file his brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER appellant’s brief 

filed by November 17, 2022. If appellant fails to file his brief by November 17, 
–2–

2022, the Court may abate this case for a hearing in the trial court to determine 

why the brief has not been filed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b).

/s/ DENNISE GARCIA

JUSTICE
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Corporation for National and Community Service

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Erma Hodge, NCCC, Corporation for National and Community Service, 10th Floor, Room 10404A, 1201 New York Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20525. Phone (202) 606-6696. Fax (202) 606-3462. TDD: (202) 606-3472. E-mail:                         *ehodge@cns.gov*.                     

      ( print page 61962)    
Dated: October 17, 2006. 

Frank R. Trinity, 

General Counsel. 

[FR Doc. 06-8832 Filed 10-18-06; 3:36 pm] 

BILLING CODE 6050-$$-P
# EUR-Lex - 12008E250 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008E250

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - PART SIX: INSTITUTIONAL AND FINANCIAL PROVISIONS - TITLE I: INSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS - Chapter 1: The institutions - Section 4: The Commission - Article 250 (ex Article 219 TEC) **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0157 - 0157 *

Article 250

(ex Article 219 TEC)

The Commission shall act by a majority of its Members.

Its Rules of Procedure shall determine the quorum.

--------------------------------------------------
### EXHIBIT 99.2



### Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Rick L. Hurt, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
of Intermountain Refining Co., Inc. certify that

1. I have reviewed the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of
Intermountain Refining Co., Inc;
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain
any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this quarterly report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly
report.

Date: July 10,
2007/s/ Rick L.
HurtRick L.
HurtTreasurer and Chief Financial
Officer
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.§ 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO § 906**

**OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the filing of the amendedAnnual Report on Form 10-K/A of Idearc Inc., a Delaware corporation(the “Company”), for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each ofthe undersigned officers of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that, to such officer’s knowledge:

 

1.             TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.             Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of thedates and for the periods expressed in the Report.

 
| Date: March 27, 2009 | /s/ SCOTT W. KLEIN                    |
|---------------------------|---------------------------------------|
|                      |                                  |
|                      | Scott W. Klein                        |
|                      | Chief Executive Officer               |
|                      | (Principal Executive Officer)         |
|                      |                                  |
|                      |                                  |
|                      | /s/ SAMUEL D. JONES                   |
|                      |                                  |
|                      | Samuel D. Jones                       |
|                      | Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
|                      | (Principal Financial Officer)         |

 

The foregoing certification is beingfurnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed aspart of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

 

----
This table was generated on 9/7/23.

Rank ID # Committee Amount

1 C00401224 ACTBLUE $331,393,919

2 C00694323 WINRED $183,596,258

3 C00836353 NEWSOM FOR CALIFORNIA GOVERNOR 2022 $23,240,059

4 C00341396 MOVEON.ORG POLITICAL ACTION $11,790,589

5 C00492140 AB PAC $7,131,800

6 C00580068 PROGRESSIVE TURNOUT PROJECT $6,498,640

7 C00654053 THE PAC FOR AMERICA'S FUTURE $5,369,526

8 C00603084 NATIONAL DEMOCRATIC TRAINING COMMITTEE PAC $4,664,369

9 C00693515 FAIR FIGHT $4,322,242

10 C00840546 TRUST IN THE MISSION PAC $4,292,540

11 C00687103 AMERICANS FOR PROSPERITY ACTION, INC. (AFP ACTION) DBA CVA ACTION AND DBA LIBRE A $4,175,397

12 C00725820 THE LINCOLN PROJECT $3,579,536

13 C00606962 WFP NATIONAL PAC $3,156,008

14 C00495028 HMP $2,987,158

15 C00789966 FORWARD PARTY $2,665,101

16 C00632133 SWING LEFT $2,481,638

17 C00770214 CHAMPION AMERICAN VALUES $2,252,850

18 C00504530 CONGRESSIONAL LEADERSHIP FUND $2,210,901

19 C00745786 DEMOCRATIC STRATEGY INSTITUTE $2,001,834

20 C00495861 PRIORITIES USA ACTION $1,999,198

21 C00540443 GIFFORDS PAC $1,964,354

22 C00418897 VOTEVETS $1,860,177

23 C00815928 READY TO WIN $1,835,717

24 C00633248 314 ACTION FUND $1,643,126

25 C00828061 SFA FUND, INC $1,641,891

26 C00728360 MOVEMENT VOTER PAC $1,506,758

27 C00678839 INDIVISIBLE ACTION $1,500,522

28 C00633404 STOP REPUBLICANS $1,494,751

29 C00753558 DEMOCRATIC VICTORY PAC, INC. $1,393,090

30 C00428557 COLOROFCHANGE PAC $1,311,543

31 C00748228 MARCH ON PAC $1,191,828

32 C00636027 TECH FOR CAMPAIGNS $1,129,562

33 C00760124 NATIONAL VICTORY ACTION FUND $854,721

34 C00764233 DEFEND THE VOTE $814,121

35 C00764860 THE 1776 PROJECT POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $810,317

36 C00806893 JANE FONDA CLIMATE PAC $799,525

37 C00630665 JUSTICE DEMOCRATS PAC $772,116

38 C00692319 VPP $767,251

39 C00799361 ELDER FOR AMERICA $670,714

40 C00707091 GRASSROOTS DEMOCRATS HQ $669,716

41 C00640664 GREAT AMERICA COMMITTEE $655,164

42 C00250399 AUTOMOTIVE FREE INTERNATIONAL TRADE PAC $638,849

43 C00607374 ELBERT GUILLORY'S AMERICA $623,383

44 C00679191 DIGIDEMS PAC $608,090

45 C00130658 CPAC ACTION PAC $596,168

46 C00768101 MISSION DEMOCRACY PAC $552,424

47 C00773846 OPEN DEMOCRACY PAC $550,022

48 C00693531 FUTURE LEADERS FUND $533,921

49 C00731133 MAKE LIBERTY WIN $529,404

50 C00559740 GOPAC ELECTION FUND $513,706

January 1 - June 30, 20223

Top 50 Committees with Non-Contribution Accounts (Hybrid PACs) by Disbursements

PAC Table 13b
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Sound Worldwide Holdings, Inc., (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Tony Ka
Kin Chui, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, That to the best of my knowledge:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








SOUND
WORLDWIDE HOLDINGS, INC.




By /s/ Tony Ka Kin
Chui


Tony Ka
Kin Chui


Principle
Financial Officer


July 13,
2010
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-60902

Summary Calendar

ERNEST SELAMBI,

Petitioner

v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A099 276 481

Before BENAVIDES, STEWART, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Ernest Selambi, a citizen of Cameroon, has filed a petition for review of the

Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) dismissal of his appeal from the decision

of the immigration judge denying his application for withholding of removal and

relief under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). Before this court, he does

not challenge the adverse ruling on his application for withholding of removal

or relief under the CAT. Instead, he contends that the BIA abused its discretion

by not considering his pro se brief, which included documentary evidence

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

August 24, 2011

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 10-60902 Document: 00511581422 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/24/2011
No. 10-60902

presented for the first time in the case, as a motion to remand or reopen the

proceedings. Selambi also asserts that any denial of such a motion constitutes

an abuse of discretion because his new evidence was material and some of it was

not available at the time of his hearing before the immigration judge.

When an alien files a motion seeking consideration of new evidence during

the pendency of an appeal to the BIA, it is considered a motion to remand in the

nature of a motion to reopen. Ramchandani v. Gonzales, 434 F.3d 337, 340 n.6

(5th Cir. 2005). Such a motion is subject to the same standards and regulations

governing motions to reopen. Id. We review the BIA’s denial of a motion to

reopen “under a highly deferential abuse-of-discretion standard.” Zhao v.

Gonzales, 404 F.3d 295, 303 (5th Cir. 2005). That discretion will not be

disturbed unless it is arbitrary, capricious, racially invidious, or utterly without

evidentiary foundation. Mai v. Gonzales, 473 F.3d 162, 164 (5th Cir. 2006).

Contrary to Selambi’s assertion, the BIA in fact expressly declined to

remand the case for further consideration. Moreover, although Selambi did

present some evidence that was not available at the time of his hearing before

the immigration judge, he has not shown that the evidence was material or that

it would have affected the adverse credibility finding, which was based on his

attempts to rely on a sham marriage to adjust his status and on discrepancies

and omissions in Selambi’s testimony, application, and evidence regarding the

abuses that he personally suffered. Thus, Selambi has not shown that the BIA

abused its discretion by denying his motion to remand. See 8 C.F.R.

§ 1003.2(c)(1); Mai, 473 F.3d at 164. Consequently, Selambi’s petition for review

is DENIED.

2

Case: 10-60902 Document: 00511581422 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/24/2011
EX 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of AS-IP Tech, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending September 30, 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), Philip A. Shiels, Chief Financial Officer of the Company does hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to his knowledge:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/    Philip A. Shiels

Philip A. Shiels

Chief Financial Officer

February 11, 2016

[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to AS-IP Tech, Inc. and will be retained by AS-IP Tech, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-1405

LAWRENCE VERLINE WILDER, SR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

DONNA E. SHALALA, SECRETARY, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,
Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (1:97-cv-02616-WDQ)

Submitted: August 20, 2009 Decided: August 24, 2009

Before WILKINSON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lawrence Verline Wilder, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Lawrence Verline Wilder, Sr., appeals the district
court's order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm. Wilder's request for rehearing and motion for
appointment of counsel are denied. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED