alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 292.48 Grazing activities. The following standards and guidelines apply to domestic livestock grazing activities on Other Lands, Wild and Scenic Rivers, and Wilderness Lands in the HCNRA. ( a ) Grazing may be authorized only on rangeland determined by the authorized officer to be suitable for grazing and meeting or moving towards satisfactory condition and meeting the conditions described in paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) Where domestic livestock grazing is incompatible with the protection, restoration, or maintenance of fish and wildlife or their habitats; public outdoor recreation; conservation of scenic, wilderness, and scientific values; rare combinations of outstanding ecosystems, or the protection and enhancement of the values for which a wild and scenic river was designated, the livestock use shall be modified as necessary to eliminate or avoid the incompatibility. In the event an incompatibility persists after the modification or modification is not feasible, the livestock use shall be terminated.
( c ) Range improvements must be designed and located to minimize their impact on scenic, cultural, fish and wildlife, and other resources in the HCNRA.
( d ) The authorization of grazing use, through a grazing permit, must provide for terms and conditions which protect and conserve riparian areas.
Your session is about to expire.Resume session

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Welcome.Log inorregisterCOPS OFFICE RESOURCE CENTER

HomeCatalogCartOrders

                    

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                CatalogMatches: 1Offline form Recent Popular Online Print OtherCOPS-P332Health, Safety, and Wellness Program Case Studies in Law EnforcementIn this publication, the Major Cities Chiefs Association and the U.S. Department of Justice's Officer Safety and Wellness (OSW) Group present four recent case studies that serve as models for safety, health, and wellness programs focused on the physical and psychological health of officers. The OSW Group conducted site visits, assessed programs, and questioned participants to identify practical strategies for reducing the incidence of diabetes, promoting physical fitness, providing rehabilitation services, and addressing other health issues.By Joseph B. Kuhns, Edward R. Maguire, Nancy R. LeachCategories: Police OperationsLanguage: EnglishPublic linkhttps://portal.cops.usdoj.gov/resourcecenter?item=cops-p332Click here to see the entire catalog.Cart:Download PDFBook • Oct 2015Search catalogreset title abstract authors contentContaining text: exact phraseNot containing text: exact phraseLanguage:anyEnglishSpanishHmongVietnameseCategory:anyAlternatives to IncarcerationCommunity PartnershipsData and AnalysisEthics and IntegrityFoundations of Community PolicingHiring, Recruitment, and RetentionHomeland SecurityNew Immigrant CommunitiesNonviolent CrimeOtherPolice OperationsPOP Center ResourceSchool and Campus SafetyTechnologyTribalViolent CrimeYouth SafetyPublished after:Published before:Page1

                    

FOIA | No FEAR Act | Open Government | Privacy | Legal|HelpCopyright (C) U.S. Department of Justice, COPS Office, IT Division, 2012 - 2024. All rights reserved.
Rendered on Mon Mar 4 2024 at 05:25 (UTC-5) in 0.91 secEnterprise Framework 3.21.7.7 • Store Controls 3.3.1.7Survey 500303407 Section 60000560 Rules Hints Inactive
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
     FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FROM THE REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-K FOR THE QUARTER ENDED
     3/31/98.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER>                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                     U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                  JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                    MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                            1
<CASH>                                 4,086
<SECURITIES>                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                         10,816
<ALLOWANCES>                             265
<INVENTORY>                                0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      16,300
<PP&E>                                31,836
<DEPRECIATION>                        29,913
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        51,016
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 10,284
<BONDS>                                3,495
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                0
<COMMON>                                  46
<OTHER-SE>                            33,877
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          51,016
<SALES>                               52,007
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      52,007
<CGS>                                      0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         39,383
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                       9,732
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          81
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       357
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        2,535
<INCOME-TAX>                             966
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    1,569
<DISCONTINUED>                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                             (2,371)
<NET-INCOME>                            (802)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           (.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                           (.17)
        


</TABLE>
# Az Európai Unió C 92A/2007

| | ISSN 1725-518X |
| --- | --- |
| Az Európai Unió
  Hivatalos Lapja | C 92A |
| | |
| Magyar nyelvű kiadás | Tájékoztatások és közlemények | 50. évfolyam2007. április 27. |

ISSN 1725-518X

Az Európai Unió

Hivatalos Lapja

C 92A

Magyar nyelvű kiadás

Tájékoztatások és közlemények

50. évfolyam2007. április 27.

---

| Közleményszám | Tartalom | Oldal |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Hirdetmények |
| | IGAZGATÁSI ELJÁRÁSOK |
| | Bizottság |
| 2007/C 092A/01 | Pályázati felhívás a Nemek Közötti Egyenlőség Európai Intézete igazgatói állásának betöltésére – (AD 13-as besorolás) – COM/2007/10049 | 1 |

Közleményszám

Tartalom

Oldal

V   Hirdetmények

IGAZGATÁSI ELJÁRÁSOK

Bizottság

2007/C 092A/01

Pályázati felhívás a Nemek Közötti Egyenlőség Európai Intézete igazgatói állásának betöltésére – (AD 13-as besorolás) – COM/2007/10049

1

| HU | |
| --- | --- |

HU

---

V Hirdetmények

IGAZGATÁSI ELJÁRÁSOK

Bizottság

| 27.4.2007 | HU | Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja | CA 92/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.4.2007

HU

Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja

CA 92/1

---

PÁLYÁZATI FELHÍVÁS A NEMEK KÖZÖTTI EGYENLŐSÉG EURÓPAI INTÉZETE IGAZGATÓI ÁLLÁSÁNAK BETÖLTÉSÉRE

(AD 13-as besorolás)

COM/2007/10049

(2007/C 92 A/01)

A vilniusi székhelyű Nemek Közötti Egyenlőség Európai Intézete igazgatót keres.

Az igazgatót az Intézet igazgatótanácsa nevezi ki az Európai Bizottság által kiválasztott és javasolt jelöltek listája alapján. Az igazgató kinevezése AD 13-as besorolású ideiglenes alkalmazottként történik az Európai Közösségek egyéb alkalmazottainak alkalmazási feltételeiről szóló szabályozás 2. a) cikke értelmében öt évre szóló, határozott idejű, legfeljebb ugyanennyi időre meghosszabbítható megbízással. A Bizottság tiszteletben tartja az esélyegyenlőség elvét.

A jelentkező az Európai Unió valamely tagállamának állampolgára kell legyen.

A munkakör részletes leírása, a jelentkezési formanyomtatvány és a jelentkezés benyújtására vonatkozó tájékoztató letölthető az alábbi internetcímről:

http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/personnel_administration/working_senior_mgt_en.htm.

A pályázatok elfogadásának határideje 2007. június 4.

---
Proposed Rule: Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Subpart W

Meeting Documentation: Nobel Energy and National Environmental Strategies 9/8/10

Date Staff Contact 

Information (Name, 

email, phone #)

Name of 

Organization 

(Attach list of all 

attendees names 

and emails if 

possible) 

Summary of Discussion (e.g., applicability, 

reporting requirements, etc.)

Written 

Comments 

Provided?

Did they

also submit 

to Docket?

Date sent to

EPA- CCD

9/8/10

Roger Fernandez (EPA)

Suzie Waltzer (EPA)

Brian Lockard, 

Curtis Reuter –

Noble Energy

Marc 

Himmelstein –

National 

Environmental 

Strategies

To provide an overview of comments 

submitted on the Proposed Rule: Mandatory 

Reporting of Greenhouse Gas Emissions 

Subpart W. 

Written 

comments 

were 

submitted to 

the docket 

during the 

public 

comment 

period
§ 1007.6 Time limits for processing initial requests. ( a ) *Basic limit.* Requests for records shall be processed promptly. A determination whether to grant or deny a request shall be made within 20 working days after receipt of a request. This determination shall be communicated immediately to the requester.
( b ) *Running of basic time limit.* ( 1 ) The 20 working day time limit begins to run when a perfected request meeting the requirements of § 1007.3(b) is received at the Presidio Trust.
( 2 ) The running of the basic time limit may be delayed or tolled as explained in § 1007.9(f), (g) and (h) if a requester: ( i ) Has not stated a willingness to pay fees as high as are anticipated and has not sought and been granted a full fee waiver; or
( ii ) Has not made a required advance payment.
( c ) *Extensions of time.* In the following unusual circumstances, the time limit for acting on an initial request may be extended to the extent reasonably necessary to the proper processing of the request, but in no case may the time limit be extended by more than 20 working days: ( 1 ) The need to search for and collect the requested records from facilities or other establishments that are separate from the main office of the Presidio Trust;
( 2 ) The need to search for, collect, and appropriately examine a voluminous amount of separate and distinct records demanded in a single request; or
( 3 ) The need for consultation, which shall be conducted with all practicable speed, with another department or agency having a substantial interest in the determination of the request.
( d ) *Notice of extension.* A requester shall be notified in writing of an extension under paragraph (c) of this section. The notice shall state the reason for the extension and the date on which a determination on the request is expected to be made. When the extension exceeds ten working days, the requester shall be provided with an opportunity to modify the request or arrange an alternative time period for processing the original or modified request. The requester shall also be notified of the dispute resolution services offered by the Office of Government Information Services.
( e ) *Treatment of delay as denial.* If no determination has been reached at the end of the 20 working day period for deciding an initial request, or an extension thereof under paragraph (c) of this section, the requester may deem the request denied and may exercise a right of appeal in accordance with § 1007.7.
( f ) *Notice of delay.* When a determination cannot be reached within the time limit, or extension thereof, the requester shall be notified of the reason for the delay, of the date on which a determination may be expected, and of the right to treat the delay as a denial for purposes of appeal, including a reference to the procedures for filing an appeal in § 1007.7.
[83 FR 50832, Oct. 10, 2018]
# EUR-Lex - 12008E147 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008E147

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - PART THREE: UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS - TITLE IX: EMPLOYMENT - Article 147 (ex Article 127 TEC) **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0112 - 0112 *

Article 147

(ex Article 127 TEC)

1. The Union shall contribute to a high level of employment by encouraging cooperation between Member States and by supporting and, if necessary, complementing their action. In doing so, the competences of the Member States shall be respected.

2. The objective of a high level of employment shall be taken into consideration in the formulation and implementation of Union policies and activities.

--------------------------------------------------
Case 16-27715 Doc 8 Filed 08/31/16 Entered 09/01/16 07:08:11 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
Utah DEQ: Programs: Selenium Program http://www.deq.u tah.gov/ProgramsServices/pro grams/water/selenium/ind... 1 of 2 4/20/2016 4:53 PMUtah DEQ: Programs: Selenium Program http://www.deq.u tah.gov/ProgramsServices/pro grams/water/selenium/ind... 2 of 2 4/20/2016 4:53 PM
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Caisey Harlingten, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Phage Genomics, Inc.;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; and

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report.

4.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15) for the registrant and we have:

a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c)  presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a)  all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Dated this 14th day of May, 2004.

| | /s/ Caisey Harlingten
Caisey Harlingten
President, Principal Executive Officer
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dnte of 

report 

1968 

Feb. 1 

1 

1 

~ruutr nf tqr luitr~ itatrs 

NINETIETH CONGRESS 

FIRST SESSION {Co~vened January ro, 1967 

AdJourned December 15, 1967 

SECOND SESSION {Convened January 15, rg68 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

P1·e pared under the direction of FRANCIS R. V ALEO, Secretary of the Senate 

By GERALD A. HACKETT, Executive Clerk 

Friday, February 2, 1968 

NOMINATIONS 

Calendar Message Name ofnommee Office Predecessor 

No. No 

DEPARTMENT OF 

STATE 

6 2 Edward D. Re, of New An Assistant Secretary of Charles Frankel. 

York. State. 

u.s. ADVISORY COMMISSION ON INFOR· 

MATION 

7 16 Palmer Hoyt, of Colorado __ Member of the U.S. Advis- Reappointment. 

sory Commission on Information for a term of 3 

years expiring Jan. 27, 

1971, and until his suecessor is appointed and 

qualified. 

7 16 Morris S. N ovik, of New _____ do ___________ _____ ___ Do. 

York. 

85-022-68-No. 125 

U I OOVERNJIEHT PRIJITING OFFICE 1111
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED APRIL 12, 2023

NO. 03-23-00073-CV

Natin Paul, Individually and as Trustee of the Natin Paul Management Trust Dated 

February 29, 2012, Appellant

v.

HAR-3M, LLC, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 459TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES TRIANA AND THEOFANIS

DISMISSED ON APPELLANT’S MOTION -- OPINION BY JUSTICE THEOFANIS

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on November 9, 2022. Appellant

has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, and having considered the motion, the Court agrees that 

the motion should be granted. Therefore, the Court grants the motion and dismisses the appeal. 

The appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 733 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 733

To clarify that convictions for kidnapping or sexual abuse are grounds 
    for inadmissibility and deportability under the Immigration and 
                            Nationality Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 9, 2023

   Mr. Thune (for himself, Mr. Tillis, Mr. Lankford, and Mr. Moran) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To clarify that convictions for kidnapping or sexual abuse are grounds 
    for inadmissibility and deportability under the Immigration and 
                            Nationality Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Reverse Entry for Migrant Offenders 
and Violence Expulsion Act''.

SEC. 2. GROUNDS FOR INADMISSIBILITY.

    Section 212(a)(2)(F) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 
U.S.C. 1182(a)(2)(F)) is amended to read as follows:
                    ``(F) Kidnapping; sexual abuse.--Any alien who has 
                been convicted of--
                            ``(i) any offense under chapter 55 of title 
                        18, United States Code (related to kidnapping); 
                        or
                            ``(ii) any offense under chapter 109A of 
                        such title (related to sexual abuse),
                is inadmissible.''.

SEC. 3. GROUNDS FOR DEPORTATION.

    Section 237(a)(2)(D)(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 
U.S.C. 1227(a)(2)(D)(i)) is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``chapter 55 (relating to kidnapping),'' 
        after ``espionage),''; and
            (2) by inserting ``chapter 109A (relating to sexual 
        abuse),'' after ``sabotage),''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                        PURSUANT TO 18U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ace Marketing & Promotions, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Sean
McDonnell, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


                                                      /S/ SEAN MCDONNELL
                                                      -----------------------
                                                      SEAN MCDONNELL
                                                      CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                                      MAY 15, 2006
#### Henry Moeller, appellee, v. Franklin County, appellant.

Filed April 3, 1914.

No. 17,715.

Appeal: Conflicting Evidence. In an action to recover the damages sustained by a landowner for establishing and opening a county road over and across his land, if the evidence as to the amount of plaintiff’s damages is conflicting, the verdict of the jury will not be set aside unless it clearly appears to be wrong.

Appeal from the district court for Franklin county: Ernest B. Perry, Judge.

*Affirmed.*

*George Losey,*for appellant.

*II. W. Short*and *W. H.*Miller, *contra.*

Barnes, J.

This cause was tried in the district court for Franklin county on an appeal from an order of the county hoard allowing the plaintiff $80 as his damages for establishing and opening a county road over and across the plaintiff’s land. The cause was tried to a jury, and a verdict was re. turned in favor of the plaintiff for $150. Judgment was rendered on the verdict, and the defendant has brought the case to this court by an appeal.

The only error assigned in defendant’s brief is that the verdict was excessive, and that is the only question argued by the appellant. The evidence as to the amount of plaintiff’s damages was conflicting. ' The testimony of the witnesses for the plaintiff fixed the value of the plaintiff’s land actually taken for the road at from $30 to $150; while some of the witnesses, for the county testified that the plaintiff’s land was actually benefited by the establishment of the road. It appears that on the line of the highway was a private bridge constructed by plaintiff, and that bridge was taken and appropriated by the county for the public use. The testimony showed that it would cost about $200 to construct a bridge over the stream crossed by the highway. *663The value of the bridge, whatever it was, should have been awarded to plaintiff and included in his damages. Therefore we are unable to say that the verdict was so excessive as to entitle the defendant to a new trial. As has often been decided by this court, ivhen the evidence is conflicting a verdict of the jury will not be set aside unless it is shown to be clearly wrong.

The judgment of the district court should be, and is,

Affirmed.

Letton, Fawcett and Hamer, JJ., not sitting.
§ 327.5 Swimming. ( a ) Swimming, wading, snorkeling or scuba diving at one's own risk is permitted, except at launching sites, designated mooring points and public docks, or other areas so designated by the District Commander.
( b ) An international diver down, or inland diving flag must be displayed during underwater activities.
( c ) Diving, jumping or swinging from trees, bridges or other structures which cross or are adjacent to project waters is prohibited.
[65 FR 6900, Feb. 11, 2000]