alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Yak Communications Inc. (the
Company) Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A for the six months ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Margaret Noble, principal financial officer of the
Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1). | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2). | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |     |  |                            
|------------------ |  | --- |  | ---------------------------
|Date: May 26, 2005 |  | By: |  | /s/ Margaret Noble         
|                   |  |     |  | Margaret Noble             
|                   |  |     |  | Principal Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Yak Communications Inc. (the
Company) Quarterly Report on Form 10- QSB/A for the nine months ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Charles Zwebner, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1). | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2). | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |     |  |                        
|------------------ |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|Date: May 31, 2005 |  | By: |  | /s/ Charles Zwebner    
|                   |  |     |  | Charles Zwebner        
|                   |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 31.1



CERTIFICATION OF JOSEPH R. ROZELLE, PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER, PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934



I, Joseph R. Rozelle, certify that:



1.   I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Ruby Growth Corporation;



2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and



5.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.





Date:  January 9, 2009



| |                                
| | -------------------------------
| | /s/ Joseph R. Rozelle          
| | Joseph R. Rozelle              
| | Principal Executive Officer    
| | and Principal Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT  10.4



                                   AGREEMENT
                                   ---------

     This agreement is made as of the 7th day of December, 2000, between JACOBS
ENGINEERING GROUP INC., a Delaware corporation ("Company") and JOSEPH J. JACOBS
("Jacobs").

     In accordance with previous practice, the term for the ending of the
outstanding November 30, 1993 employment agreement between the parties is
extended from September 30, 2004 to September 30, 2005.  All of the other
provisions of the agreement shall remain in force.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this agreement to be executed by
its duly authorized representatives, and Jacobs has affixed his signature, as of
the date first above written.



                                             JOSEPH J. JACOBS
                                             ("Jacobs")

                                             /s/ Joseph J. Jacobs
                                             -----------------------------
                                             1111 S. Arroyo Parkway
                                             Pasadena, California 91105


                                             JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC.
                                             ("Company")

                                             By:  /s/ Noel G. Watson
                                                  ------------------------
                                             Noel G. Watson
                                             President

                                             By:  /s/ John W. Prosser, Jr.
                                                  ------------------------
                                             John W. Prosser, Jr.
                                             Senior Vice President
                                             Finance and Administration
#### § 801.6 Coordination with requirements under the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4321 *et seq.*).

The National Historic Preservation Act and the National Environmental Policy Act create separate and distinct responsibilities. The National Historic Preservation Act applies to those aspects of a project which may affect National Register properties and those which are eligible for listing in the National Register. The requirements for the National Environmental Policy Act apply to the effect that the project will have on the human environment. To the extent that the applicant finds it practicable to do so, the requirements of these two statutes should be integrated. Some projects, for reasons other than the effects on historic properties, may require an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) subject to the time requirements for a draft and final EIS, in which case the applicant may choose to separately relate to the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Department of the Interior, and the Council for purposes of section 110(c) of the HCDA of 1980. In that event, information in the draft EIS should indicate that compliance with section 106 and these regulations is underway and the final EIS should reflect the results of this process. Applicants are directed to 36 CFR 800.9, which describes in detail the manner in which the requirements of these two acts should be integrated and applies to all UDAG applicants under these regulations.

In those instances in which an Environmental Impact Statement will be prepared for the project, the applicant should consider phasing compliance with these procedures and the preparation of the Statement.
# Congressional Candidate Table 2
EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of WNC Housing Tax
Credit VI, L.P., Series 7 (the "Partnership") for the period ended June 30, 2003
as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the
"Report"),  and  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.,  section  1350,  as adopted  pursuant to
section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  I,  Wilfred N.  Cooper,  Sr.,
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates,  Inc., general partner
of the Partnership, hereby certify that to my knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Partnership.


/s/THOMAS J. RIHA
-----------------
Thomas J. Riha
Chief Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.
August 18, 2003
§ 271.4 Commercial license. ( a ) The Chief may authorize the commercial manufacture, importation, reproduction, or use of *Smokey Bear* upon the following findings: ( 1 ) That the use to which the article or published material involving Smokey Bear is to be put shall contribute to public information concerning the prevention of forest fires.
( 2 ) That the proposed use is consistent with the status of Smokey Bear as the symbol of forest fire prevention and does not in any way detract from such status.
( 3 ) That a use or royalty charge which is reasonably related to the commercial enterprise has been established.
( b ) Such other conditions shall be included as the Chief deems necessary in particular cases.
Rockingham,

No. 5036.

#### Newington *v.*Campanella & Cardi Construction Co., Inc.

Argued June 6, 1962.

Decided July 16, 1962.

*242*Boynton, Waldron & Dill*and *Glen E. Grayer {Mr. Grayer*orally), for the plaintiff.

*Fisher, Parsons*& *Moran {Mr. Harold D. Moran*orally), for the defendant.

Wheeler, J.

The question presented is whether interest shall be assessed on the verdict under the provisions of RSA 524:1; RSA 524:l-a or under RSA 76:13.

In the previous transfer of this case *(Newington*v. *Campanella Construction Co.,*103 N. H. 211) we sustained a verdict of $1,250 for timber yield taxes due under RSA ch. 79. Among other provisions, said chapter provides that “said tax shall constitute a lien upon all real estate of the owner on the date of assessment and may be enforced and collected by any appropriate means provided for the collection of taxes in chapter 80 of this title . . . and shall be subject to the same interest as general property taxes.” RSA 79:12. See RSA 79:6 (supp).

RSA 76:13 provides: “Interest. Interest at six per cent shall be charged upon all taxes not paid on or before December first, after their assessment, from that date, which shall be collected with the taxes incident thereto.”

One of the methods permitted for the collection of taxes is by suit at law which was followed by the plaintiff in this instance. RSA 80:50. Since the statute (RSA 76:13) makes special provision for interest on taxes not paid on December first after their assessment, we think this provision must control rather than the general provision for interest on judgments for debt or where liquidated damages are sought. RSA 524:1; RSA 524:1-a.

It follows that the computation of interest must be governed by the provisions of RSA 76:13.

*Remanded.*

All concurred.
#### § 1150.25 Date of service.

The date of service shall be the day when the matter is deposited in United States mail or is delivered in person, except that the date of service of the initial notice of hearing or opportunity for hearing shall be the date of its delivery, or the date that its attempted delivery is refused.
#### § 51.71 What is the process to be followed if there is a dispute between the prior concessioner and the Director as to the value of possessory interest?

Unless other procedures are agreed to by the concessioner and the Director, in the event that a concessioner under a possessory interest concession contract is awarded a new concession contract and there is a dispute between the concessioner and the Director as to the value of such possessory interest, or, a dispute as to the allocation of an established overall possessory interest value on a unit by unit basis, the value and/or allocation will be established by arbitration in accordance with the terms and conditions of this part. The arbitration procedures are described in § 51.51.
§ 51.5 What information will the prospectus include? The prospectus must include the following information: ( a ) The minimum requirements of the concession contract. The minimum requirements of the concession contract, include, but are not limited to the following: ( 1 ) The minimum acceptable franchise fee or other forms of consideration to the Government;
( 2 ) The minimum visitor services that the concessioner is to be authorized to provide;
( 3 ) The minimum capital investment, if any, that the concessioner must make;
( 4 ) The minimum measures that the concessioner must take to ensure the protection, conservation, and preservation of the resources of the park area; and
( 5 ) Any other minimum requirements that the new contract may specify, including, as appropriate and without limitation, measurable performance standards;
( b ) The terms and conditions of a current concession contract, if any, relating to the visitor services to be provided, including all fees and other forms of compensation provided to the Director under such contract;
( c ) A description of facilities and services, if any, that the Director may provide to the concessioner under the terms of the concession contract, including, but not limited to, public access, utilities and buildings;
( d ) An estimate of the amount of any compensation due a current concessioner from a new concessioner under the terms of an existing or prior concession contract;
( e ) A statement identifying each principal selection factor for proposals, including subfactors, if any, and secondary factors, if any, and the weight and relative importance of the principal and any secondary factors in the selection decision;
( f ) Such other information related to the proposed concession contract as is provided to the Director pursuant to a concession contract or is otherwise available to the Director, as the Director determines is necessary to allow for the submission of competitive proposals. Among other such necessary information a prospectus will contain (when applicable) are the gross receipts of the current concession contract broken out by department for the three most recent years; franchise fees charged under the current concession contract for the three most recent years; merchandise inventories of the current concessioner for the three most recent years; and the depreciable fixed assets and net depreciable fixed assets of the current concessioner; and
( g ) Identification of a preferred offeror for a qualified concession contract, if any, and, if a preferred offeror exists, a description of a right of preference to the award of the concession contract.
BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

In the Matter of ) 

Elissa Slotkin for Congress and Janica 

Kyriacopoulos in her official capacity as 

treasurer; Elissa Slotkin; Jerry Hollister 

) 

) 

) 

) 

MUR 8113 

CERTIFICATION 

I, Vicktoria J. Allen, recording secretary for the Federal Election Commission executive 

session on February 27, 2024, do hereby certify that the Commission decided by a vote of 6-0 to 

take the following actions in MUR 8113: 

1. Find no reason to believe that Jerry Hollister violated 52 U.S.C. 

§ 30116(a)(1)(A) and 11 C.F.R. § 110.1(b) by making excessive 

contributions to Elissa Slotkin’s campaign. 

2. Find no reason to believe that Elissa Slotkin and Elissa Slotkin for 

Congress and Janica Kyriacopoulos in her official capacity as treasurer 

violated 52 U.S.C. § 30116(f) and 11 C.F.R. § 110.9 by knowingly 

accepting excessive contributions from Jerry Hollister. 

3. Find no reason to believe that Elissa Slotkin and Elissa Slotkin for 

Congress and Janica Kyriacopoulos in her official capacity as treasurer 

violated 52 U.S.C. § 30114(b)(1) and 11 C.F.R. § 113.1(g) by 

converting campaign funds to personal use. 

4. Find no reason to believe that Elissa Slotkin for Congress and Janica 

Kyriacopoulos in her official capacity as treasurer violated 52 U.S.C. 

§ 30104(b) and 11 C.F.R. § 104.13(a) by failing to report in-kind 

contributions. 

5. Approve the Factual and Legal Analysis, as recommended in the First 

General Counsel’s Report dated February 1, 2024, subject to the edits 

last circulated by Vice Chair Weintraub’s Office on February 26, 

2024. 

6. Approve the appropriate letters. 

7. Close the file. 

MUR811300066
Federal Election Commission Page 2 

Certification for MUR 8113 

February 27, 2024 

Commissioners Broussard, Cooksey, Dickerson, Lindenbaum, Trainor, and Weintraub 

voted affirmatively for the decision. 

 Attest: 

 March 1, 2024 

 

Date Vicktoria J. Allen 

 Deputy Secretary of the Commission 

Vicktoria J Allen

Digitally signed by Vicktoria J 

Allen 

Date: 2024.03.01 15:28:06 

-05'00'

MUR811300067
Presidential Documents

62053 

Federal Register 

Vol. 71, No. 203 

Friday, October 20, 2006 

Title 3— 

The President 

Notice of October 19, 2006 

Continuation of the National Emergency With Respect to Significant Narcotics Traffickers Centered in Colombia 

On October 21, 1995, by Executive Order 12978, the President declared 

a national emergency pursuant to the International Emergency Economic 

Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701–1706) to deal with the unusual and extraordinary 

threat to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United 

States constituted by the actions of significant narcotics traffickers centered 

in Colombia, and the extreme level of violence, corruption, and harm such 

actions cause in the United States and abroad. 

The order blocks all property and interests in property that are in the 

United States, or within the possession or control of United States persons, 

of foreign persons listed in an annex to the order, as well as of foreign 

persons determined to play a significant role in international narcotics trafficking centered in Colombia. The order similarly blocks all property and 

interests in property of foreign persons determined to materially assist in, 

or provide financial or technological support for or goods or services in 

support of, the narcotics trafficking activities of persons designated in or 

pursuant to the order. In addition, the order blocks all property and interests 

in property of persons determined to be owned or controlled by, or to 

act for or on behalf of, persons designated in or pursuant to the order. 

The order also prohibits any transaction or dealing by United States persons 

or within the United States in property or interests in property of the 

persons designated in or pursuant to the order. 

Because the actions of significant narcotics traffickers centered in Colombia 

continue to threaten the national security, foreign policy, and economy 

of the United States and to cause an extreme level of violence, corruption, 

and harm in the United States and abroad, the national emergency declared 

on October 21, 1995, and the measures adopted pursuant thereto to deal 

with that emergency, must continue in effect beyond October 21, 2006. 

Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies 

mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with PRESDOC

62054 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 203 / Friday, October 20, 2006 / Presidential Documents 

Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing for 1 year the national emergency 

with respect to significant narcotics traffickers centered in Colombia. This 

notice shall be published in the Federal Register and transmitted to the 

Congress. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

October 19, 2006. 

[FR Doc. 06–8840 

Filed 10–19–06; 1:14 pm] 

Billing code 3195–01–P 


mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with PRESDOCGWBOLD.EPS</GPH>
#### § 5.14 Prospecting, mining, and mineral leasing.

Prospecting, mining, and the location of mining claims under the general mining laws and leasing under the mineral leasing laws are prohibited in park areas except as authorized by law.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

DROPLETS, INC.,

Plaintiff-Cross-Appellant

v.

YAHOO! INC.,

Defendant-Appellant

OATH HOLDINGS INC., dba Verizon Media, OATH 

INC., dba Verizon Media,

Intervenors-Appellants

______________________

2023-1854, 2023-1914

______________________

Appeals from the United States District Court for the 

Northern District of California in No. 4:12-cv-03733-JST, 

Judge Jon S. Tigar.

______________________

ON MOTION

______________________

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the parties’ joint stipulation of 

voluntary dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate 

Procedure 42(b),

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

Case: 23-1854 Document: 28 Page: 1 Filed: 12/20/2023
2 DROPLETS, INC. v. YAHOO! INC.

(1) These appeals are dismissed. Each side shall bear 

its own costs.

(2) ECF No. 25 is denied as moot.

December 20, 2023

 Date

FOR THE COURT

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: December 20, 2023

Case: 23-1854 Document: 28 Page: 2 Filed: 12/20/2023