alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 208 (Friday, October 27, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63027-63028]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-8919]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Environmental Health 
Sciences Special Emphasis Panel, Mentored Patient-Oriented Research 
Career Development Award.
    Date: November 9, 2006.
    Time: 2 p.m. to 4 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: NIEHS/National Institutes of Health, Building 4401, East 
Campus, 79 T.W. Alexander Drive, 122, Research Triangle Park, NC 
27709 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Linda K. Bass, PhD., Scientific Review 
Administrator, Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural 
Research and Training, National Institute of Environmental Health 
Sciences, P.O. Box 12233, MD EC-30, Research Triangle Park, NC 
27709. 919/541-1307.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.115, 
Biometry and Risk Estimation--Health Risks from Environmental 
Exposures; 93.142, NIEHS Hazardous Waste Worker Health and Safety 
Training; 93.143, NIEHS Superfund Hazardous Substances--Basic 
Research and Education; 93.894, Resources and Manpower Development 
in the Environmental Health Sciences; 93.113, Biological Response to 
Environmental Health Hazards; 93.114, Applied Toxicological Research 
and Testing, National Institutes of Health, HHS)


[[Page 63028]]


    Dated: October 19, 2006.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 06-8919 Filed 10-26-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Date of 

report 

1970 

June 30 

&ruutr nf tqr luittb itutrs 

NINETY-FIRST CONGRESS 

F S {Convened January 3, 1969 

IRST ESSION Adjourned December 23, 1969 

S S {Convened January 19, 1970 

ECOND ESSION . 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Prepared under the direction of FRA.Ncrs R. V ALEO, Secretary of the Senate 

By GERALD A. HACKETT, Executive Clerk 

Monday, July 13, 1970 

NOMINATION 

Calendar Message N arne of nominee i Office Predecessor No. No. 

\ INTERSTATE COM- I 

MERCE COMMISSION I ' ; 

106 154 W. Donald Brewer, of An Interstate Commerce I Paul J. Tierney. 

Colorado. Commissioner for the 

i 

term of 7 years expiring 

I Dec. 31, 1976. 

48-022--70--No.196 

U.S. liOVERIHtUI! PRINTING OFFICE: 1970
Pump 

Type

Pump Type 

(ANSI/HI)

NEMA BIS 

Estimated 

Shipments 

Estimated 

Shipments 

Operating

Shipment 

Weighted 

Shaft HP at 

BEP

Connected 

Load (kW)

Average 

Percent 

Power 

Draw

Estimated 

Hours of 

Operation 

A

ESCC OH7 171,456 8 1,061,621 74% 1,913

ESFM OH0/OH1 44,042 19 624,251 74% 2,188

IL OH3/OH4/OH5 50,424 10 376,163 74% 2,000

RS-V VS8 49,975 6 223,688 74% 2,823

VT-S VS0 104,406 16 1,246,190 74% 1,500

DS BB1/OH4 5,311 80 316,960 74% 2,000

AS BB1/BB3 277 70 14,465 74% 3,224

RS-H BB2/BB4 2,874 - 74% 2,823

VT VS1/VS2 5,815 25 108,450 74% 750

IL and DS hours of operation should be similar to End Suction because they are substitutes

Often sold in pairs (75% of the time - HVAC, municipal, pressure booster), so that 50% are not operating - lead and lag

Operation hours are less than what a typical worker works - Why?

2,000 hours for ESCC and ESFM is probably pretty accurate

Commercial buildings have hours of operation through 90.1 PNNL models - pull out schedules

Operating hours are tied to lifetime, but in some applications, fewer hours are worse

VT operating hours may be too high because mostly ag; may not run 400 hours a year

Doug sees decline in efficiency of 1% every year due to wear and tear

Lot 11

Lot 11+

TOTAL Lot 11

TOTAL Lot 11+
Lifetime 20

Estimated 

Hours of 

Operation 

B

Annual 

Energy 

Use A 

(TWh)

Annual 

Energy 

Use B 

(TWh)

Min Max

Min 

Energy 

Savings 

(TWh)

Max 

Energy 

Savings 

(TWh)

Quads 

over 30 

years of 

Shipments - 

Min

Quads 

over 30 

years of 

Shipments - 

Max

 2,250 1.50 1.77 1.5% 4.3% 0.02 0.08 0.12 0.39

 2,250 1.01 1.04 1.0% 2.7% 0.01 0.03 0.05 0.14

 4,000 0.56 1.11 2.5% 4.1% 0.01 0.05 0.07 0.23

 1,500 0.47 0.25 1.4% 6.5% 0.003 0.016 0.02 0.08

 1,000 1.38 0.92 2.3% 5.4% 0.02 0.07 0.11 0.38

 0.47 0.8% 1.8% 0.004 0.01 0.02 0.04

 0.03 1.6% 3.0% 0.0006 0.0010 0.003 0.005

 - - - - -

 1,699 0.06 0.14 0.1% 0.4% 0.0001 0.0002 0.0003 0.0012

 4.92 5.09 0.07 0.24 0.37 1.23

 0.56 0.64 0.004 0.01 0.02 0.05

t operating - lead and lag

Energy Savings Estimate (%) - MEI 40
EXHIBIT 32.1

 

**SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, I, Steve Frickenstein, Chief Executive Officer of Breda Telephone Corp., certify that to my knowledge (i) Breda Telephone Corp.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Breda Telephone Corp.

 

Date:  November 14, 2006. 

 

|   | /s/ Steve Frickenstein                                       |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

DWAYNE JOHNSON, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-1866

)

EARL A. GOODWYNE, DEPUTY )

SHERIFF, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed April 27, 2018.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for 

Charlotte County; Lisa S. Porter, Judge.

Dwayne Johnson, pro se.

Darol H. M. Carr of Farr, Farr, Emerich,

Hackett, Carr and Holmes, P.A. Punta

Gorda, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

NORTHCUTT, SALARIO, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
FI L ED U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S EL EVENTH CI RCUI T FEB RUARY 23, 2010 J OHN L EY CL ERK [ D O N O T P U B L I S H ]

I N T H E U N I T E D S T A T E S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S

F O R T H E E L E V E N T H C I R C U I T

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ N o

. 0 9

- 1 3 2 7 3 N o n
- A r g u m e n t C a l e n d a r

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ D

. C

. D o c k e t N o

. 9 6

- 0 0 0 6 0

- C R

- 0 0 4

- C A R

- 5

U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A ,

P l a i n t i f f

- A p p e l l e e ,

v e r s u s

J O H N N Y G O O D M A N ,
D e f e n d a n t

- A p p e l l a n t

.

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ A p p e a l f r o m t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s D i s t r i c t C o u r t f o r t h e M i d d l e D i s t r i c t o f G e o r g i a

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ( F e b r u a r y 2 3 , 2 0 1 0 )

B e f o r e T J O F L A T , E D M O N D S O N a n d A N D E R S O N , C i r c u i t J u d g e s

.
P E R C U R I A M :

D e m e t r i a N i c o l e W i l l i a m s , a p p o i n t e d c o u n s e l f o r J o h n n y G o o d m a n i n h i sa p p e a l o f t h e d i s t r i c t c o u r t ’ s d e n i a l o f h i s m o t i o n t o r e d u c e h i s s e n t e n c e p u r s u a n t t o

1 8 U

. S

. C

. § 3 5 8 2 ( c ) ( 2 ) , h a s f i l e d a b r i e f p u r s u a n t t o A n d e r s v

. C a l i f o r n i a , 3 8 6 U

. S

.
7 3 8 , 8 7 S

. C t

. 1 3 9 6 , 1 8 L

. E d

. 2 d 4 9 3 ( 1 9 6 7 ) , a n d m o v e d t o w i t h d r a w f r o m f u r t h e r

r e p r e s e n t a t i o n o f t h e a p p e l l a n t

. O u r i n d e p e n d e n t r e v i e w o f t h e e n t i r e r e c o r d

r e v e a l s t h a t c o u n s e l ’ s a s s e s s m e n t o f t h e r e l a t i v e m e r i t o f t h e a p p e a l i s c o r r e c t

.
B e c a u s e i n d e p e n d e n t e x a m i n a t i o n o f t h e e n t i r e r e c o r d r e v e a l s n o a r g u a b l e i s s u e s o f

m e r i t , c o u n s e l ’ s m o t i o n t o w i t h d r a w i s G R A N T E D , a n d t h e d e n i a l o f G o o d m a n ’ s § 3 5 8 2 ( c ) ( 2 ) m o t i o n t o r e d u c e h i s s e n t e n c e i s A F F I R M E D

.
S O O R D E R E D

.

2
#### § 702.12 Space for meetings and special events.

Information about the use of space for meeting and special events at the Library can be found at *http://www.loc.gov/about/facilities/index.html,* or by accessing the Library's home page at *http://www.loc.gov* and following the link “About the Library” to “Event Facilities.”
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of RecycleNet and subsidiaries, (the Company) on 10-QSB for the three months ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Paul Roszel President, and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|April 30, 2004 | /s/     Paul Roszel               
|-------------- | ----------------------------------
|               | Paul Roszel                       
|               | President, Chief Executive Officer
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-31047 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ROBERT WRIGHT, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 95-CR-202-S

- - - - - - - - - - December 8, 1998 Before JOLLY, SMITH, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Robert Wright has filed a pro se appeal from his guilty-plea conviction for mail fraud. Wright argues that the district court erred by denying his request to withdraw his guilty plea, by failing to consider his pro se motion to dismiss based on double jeopardy, and by failing to rule on the various motions he filed along with his motion to withdraw his plea. Our review of the record and the arguments and authorities convinces us that no reversible error was committed. Because Wright failed in his burden of showing a fair and just reason for the withdrawal ofNo. 97-31047 -2- his guilty plea, the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying his motion to withdraw his plea. See United States v. Badger , 925 F.2d 101, 104 (5th Cir. 1991). Wright’s assertions that the district court erred by failing to consider and rule on various motions is refuted by the record. Wright’s motion to strike the Government’s brief is DENIED. His motions concerning a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 proceeding are DENIED for lack of jurisdiction. Motion for bail DENIED.
JUDGMENT AFFIRMED; MOTIONS DENIED.
§ 60.5 Nomination forms and information collection. ( a ) All nominations to the National Register are to be made on standard National Register forms. These forms are provided upon request to the State Historic Preservation Officer, participating Federal agencies and others by the NPS. For archival reasons, no other forms, photocopied or otherwise, will be accepted.
( b ) The information collection requirements contained in this part have been approved by the Office of Management and Budget under 44 U.S.C. 3507 and assigned clearance number *1024-0018.* The information is being collected as part of the nomination of properties to the National Register. This information will be used to evaluate the eligibility of properties for inclusion in the National Register under established criteria. The obligation to respond is required to obtain a benefit.
**Exhibit 21**

 

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT Note: Unless otherwise noted, theRegistrant owns 100% of the equity interest in each of the subsidiaries.

 

INCORPORATED OR ORGANIZED INMINNESOTA

 

RCC Atlantic, Inc.

RCC Atlantic Long Distance, Inc.

RCC Minnesota, Inc.

RCC Network, Inc.

RCC Paging, Inc.

RCC Holdings, Inc.

RCC Transport, Inc.

Wireless Alliance, LLC (Registrant has a 70% interest in this entity)

TLA Spectrum, LLC

RGI Group, Inc.

Cellular 2000, Inc. (Registrant has a 50% interest in this entity)

 

INCORPORATED OR ORGANIZED INDELAWARE

 

BMCT Equipment Company, LLC

Ferry Equipment Company, LLC

 

INCORPORATED OR ORGANIZED IN VERMONT

Alexandria Indemnity, Inc.

 

1

----
# PAC Table 3c
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23





                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements of Whitehall Jewellers, Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 333-38958,
333-50159, 333-47601, and 333-14895) of our report dated March 6, 2001 on our
audits of the financial statements and financial statement schedule of Whitehall
Jewellers, Inc. as of January 31, 2001 and 2000, and for the years ended January
31, 2001, 2000, and 1999, which report is included in the Whitehall Jewellers,
Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2001.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers


Chicago, Illinois
April 30, 2001
§ 291.3 Exceptions. The regulations in this part do not: ( a ) Invalidate, modify, or impose any additional restrictions or permitting requirements on any activities permitted at any time under the general mining laws, the mineral or geothermal leasing laws, laws providing for mineral materials disposal, or laws providing for the management or regulation of the activities authorized by the aforementioned laws including but not limited to the Federal Land Policy and Management Act (43 U.S.C. 1701-1784), the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (30 U.S.C. 1201-1358), and the Organic Administration Act (16 U.S.C. 478, 482, 551);
( b ) Invalidate, modify, or impose any additional restrictions or permitting requirements on any activities permitted at any time under existing laws and authorities relating to reclamation and multiple uses of National Forest System lands;
( c ) Apply to Indian lands;
( d ) Apply to any materials associated with an archaeological resource (site), as defined in 16 U.S.C. 470, or any cultural items defined in 16 U.S.C. 30001;
( e ) Apply to, or require a permit for, casual collecting of a rock, mineral, or invertebrate or plant fossil that is not protected under the Act;
( f ) Affect any land other than National Forest System lands, or affect the lawful recovery, collection, or sale of paleontological resources from land other than National Forest System lands; or
( g ) Create any right, privilege, benefit, or entitlement for any person who is not an officer or employee of the United States acting in that capacity. No person who is not an officer or employee of the United States acting in that capacity shall have standing to file any civil action in a court of the United States to enforce any provision or amendment made by this part.
COPS Office Collaborative Reform Initiative

Organizational Assessment |What is it?

-

-

-

-

-

-

In-depth 

organizational assessment

Community 

engagement strategy

Timely implementation 

of reforms

Routine public reporting

The Organizational Assessment (OA) program provides a col

laborative approach for law enforcement agencies and com

munity stakeholders to jump-start and sustain significant 

organizational reforms. The OA program prioritizes action 

over report writing. A continual assessment and implementa

tion process ensures that time and resources are used to focus 

on identifying areas for improvement, reinforcing agency 

strengths, and assisting with the implementation of reforms 

expeditiously while still providing transparency and account

ability with routine public reporting. Each engagement will 

be supported by a multidisciplinary assessment team composed of subject matter experts with diverse experience 

and perspectives including in law enforcement, commu

nity engagement, research and evaluation, program manage

ment, organizational reform, and civil rights. Learn more at

https://cops.usdoj.gov/organizationalassessment.

ANALYSIS & SOLUTIONS
#### James Russell *vs.*Henry S. Davis, J. J. Norton, trustee, and Clara M. Davis, claimant.

October Term, 1896.

Present: Rowell, Tyler, Munson, Start and Thompson, JJ.

*Judgment of County Court on Commissioner's Report.*

If the judgment of the county court upon the report of a commissioner can be fairly sustained by any inference of fact to be drawn from the report, it will be presumed to have been based upon such inference.

Trustee Process. Heard upon the report of a commissioner at the March Term, 1896, Rutland County, *Taft,*J., presiding. Judgment that the claimant is entitled to the funds, with costs, and that the trustee be discharged with costs.

The plaintiff excepted.

The report disclosed the following facts. August 14, 1894, the defendant, in common with his mother, Elizabeth Davis, owned real estate which, on that date, they conveyed for the price of one thousand dollars; in which price the mother’s share was three hundred dollars. About September 27, 1894, the defendant received, as part payment from the purchaser, three hundred dollars which he used on that day in purchasing and taking to his wife, Clara M. Davis, an assignment of a real estate mortgage against the trustee. Two or three months later, Elizabeth Davis and Clara M. Davis made an oral agreement that the former’s interest in the real estate so conveyed by the defendant and herself should thereafter belong to Clara M. Davis in consideration of their mutual expectation that the mother would live more or less in the son’s family. The rest of the one thousand dollars was used by the defendant. The trustee was not notified of the assignment, nor was it ever recorded.

*276
      *Horace TV. Love*and *A. G. Cooledge*for the plaintiff.

*Butler & Moloney*for the claimant.

Thompson, J.

If the judgment of the county court can fairly be sustained by any inference of fact it might have drawn from the commissioner’s report, it is to be presumed in this court, that the county court based its judgment on such inference. *Emery*v. Tichout, 13 Vt. 15; *Stone*v. *Foster,*16 Vt. 546; *Birchard v. Palmer, 18*Vt. 203; *Wills v. Judd,*26 Vt. 617; *Pratt*v. *Page,*32 Vt. 13.

From the facts reported, the county court might well draw the inference that the three hundred dollars invested in the John J. Norton mortgage was set apart by the defendant and his mother, Elizabeth Davis, as her share of the money received for their house in Granville, N. Y.; that the assignment of the mortgage and debt thereby secured was made to the claimant for the benefit of Elizabeth, and that subsequently the latter sold her interest therein to the claimant; and that all this occurred prior to the service of the trustee process. On these facts the claimant was clearly entitled to this fund.

The plaintiff does not now claim to hold the amount of the hundred dollar note secured by chattel mortgage.

*Judgment affirmed ijmth costs to the claimant.*
§ 261.15 Use of vehicles off roads. It is prohibited to operate any vehicle off National Forest System, State or County roads: ( a ) Without a valid license as required by State law.
( b ) Without an operable braking system.
( c ) From one-half hour after sunset to one-half hour before sunrise unless equipped with working head and tail lights.
( d ) In violation of any applicable noise emission standard established by any Federal or State agency.
( e ) While under the influence of alcohol or other drug;
( f ) Creating excessive or unusual smoke;
( g ) Carelessly, recklessly, or without regard for the safety of any person, or in a manner that endangers, or is likely to endanger, any person or property.
( h ) In a manner which damages or unreasonably disturbs the land, wildlife, or vegetative resources.
( i ) In violation of State law established for vehicles used off roads.
[42 FR 2957, Jan. 14, 1977, as amended at 42 FR 35959, July 13, 1977; 66 FR 3218, Jan. 12, 2001. Redesignated at 70 FR 68291, Nov. 9, 2005]
§ 1212.605 Award. *Award* means an award of financial assistance by the NARA or other Federal agency directly to a recipient. ( a ) The term award includes: ( 1 ) A Federal grant or cooperative agreement, in the form of money or property in lieu of money.
( 2 ) A block grant or a grant in an entitlement program, whether or not the grant is exempted from coverage under the Governmentwide rule 36 CFR part 1207 that implements OMB Circular A-102 (for availability, see 5 CFR 1310.3) and specifies uniform administrative requirements.
( b ) The term award does not include: ( 1 ) Technical assistance that provides services instead of money.
( 2 ) Loans.
( 3 ) Loan guarantees.
( 4 ) Interest subsidies.
( 5 ) Insurance.
( 6 ) Direct appropriations.
( 7 ) Veterans' benefits to individuals (*i.e.,* any benefit to veterans, their families, or survivors by virtue of the service of a veteran in the Armed Forces of the United States).
[68 FR 66544, 66617, Nov. 26, 2003, as amended at 68 FR 66617, Nov. 26, 2003]
#### Herbert T. Jennings et al., as Temporary Receivers of The Oneonta, Cooperstown and Richfield Springs Railway Company, Respondents, *v.*Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad Company et al., Appellants.

*Jennings*v. *Delaware, L. & W. R. R. Co.,*103 App. Div. 164, affirmed.

(Submitted November 26, 1907;

decided December 20, 1907.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered March 18,1905, which affirmed an order of Special Term con* *545firming the report of commissioners appointed under section 12 of the Railroad Law to determine the point and manner of a track connection.

*Lewis E. Garr*for appellants.

*Robert B. Gray*for respondents.

Order affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Yann, Werner and Willard Bartlett, JJ. Not sitting; Chase, J.