alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Town of Barre *vs.*School District No. 5 in Barre.

January Term, 1897.

Present: Ross, C. J., Rowell, Tyler, Munson and Start, JJ. ’

*Division of School Money among Taxpayers Illegal.*

Neither before nor since the act of 1892 could a school district divide among its taxpayers money devoted by law to school purposes.

By Acts of 1894, No. 165, § 73, the plaintiff was authorized to maintain this action in its own name.

Assumpsit. Heard upon an agreed statement of facts at the September Term, 1896, Washington County, *Taft,*J., presiding. Judgment for the plaintiff for the stipulated sum with interest since April 1, 1893.

The defendant excepted.

The defendant was a school district until Acts of 1892, No. 20 and 21 took effect. March 28, 1893, it voted “to divide the surplus funds in the treasury amongthetaxpayers of the *district,pro rata,*on the grand list.” The treasurer had on that date after the settlement of the pecuniary affairs of the district, $83.12, derived from taxes of the district and State, the public moneys, and the Huntington fund, and on the same day divided the money in accordance with the vote. The plaintiff is the town mentioned in § 73 of No. 165 of the Acts of 1894, and the defendant is entirely within the present limits of the plaintiff. Demand was seasonably made after April 1, 1893.

' *Richard A. Hoar*for the defendant.

This action should have been brought in the name of the Town School District, as in *Barre*v. *Cook,*68 Yt. 88.

The action cannot be maintained because the money had been divided before April 1, 1893, when the law of 1892 took effect. *School District No. 16*v. *Concord,*64 N. H. 235.

*John W. Gordon*for the plaintiff.

*375-. The case is ruled by those already decided. *Barre*v. *School District No. rj,*67 Yt. 108; *School District*y. *Pierce,*67 Yt. 317.

Start, J.

The money the defendant voted to divide among its taxpayers was, by law, devoted to the purpose of maintaining public schools; and the defendant held it in trust for this single purpose. It had no right or power, either before or after the act of 1892, abolishing school districts, took effect, to divert any of it from the purpose to which the law had devoted it; and its attempted division of the funds among its taxpayers was null, and is not a defence to this action. The case of *Barre*v. *School District No.*13, 67 Vt. 108, and the same against Cook, 68 Vt. 88, are sufficient authority for this holding. Section 73 of No. 165 of the Acts of 1894 provides, that school funds remaining in the hands of any old school district in the town of Barre may be recovered in the name of the town. Therefore, the action is properly brought by the town of Barre.

*Judgment affirmed.*
Case 16-27930 Doc 1 Filed 08/31/16 Entered 08/31/16 11:23:40 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 9
Case 16-27930 Doc 1 Filed 08/31/16 Entered 08/31/16 11:23:40 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 9
Case 16-27930 Doc 1 Filed 08/31/16 Entered 08/31/16 11:23:40 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 9
Case 16-27930 Doc 1 Filed 08/31/16 Entered 08/31/16 11:23:40 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 9
Case 16-27930 Doc 1 Filed 08/31/16 Entered 08/31/16 11:23:40 Desc Main

 Document Page 5 of 9
Case 16-27930 Doc 1 Filed 08/31/16 Entered 08/31/16 11:23:40 Desc Main

 Document Page 6 of 9
Case 16-27930 Doc 1 Filed 08/31/16 Entered 08/31/16 11:23:40 Desc Main

 Document Page 7 of 9
Case 16-27930 Doc 1 Filed 08/31/16 Entered 08/31/16 11:23:40 Desc Main

 Document Page 8 of 9
Case 16-27930 Doc 1 Filed 08/31/16 Entered 08/31/16 11:23:40 Desc Main

 Document Page 9 of 9
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED APRIL 7, 2017

NO. 03-01-00300-CV

Kenneth W. Eilers, Appellant

v.

Central Texas Bank, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 155TH DISTRICT COURT OF FAYETTE COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES FIELD AND BOURLAND

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION -- OPINION BY JUSTICE FIELD

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court. Having reviewed the record, the 

Court holds that appellant has not prosecuted his appeal and did not comply with a notice from 

the Clerk of this Court. Therefore, the Court dismisses the appeal for want of prosecution. 

Appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and the court below.
&tuutr nf tqt luittb &tatts 

NINETY-FIRST CONGRESS 

F S {Convened January 3, 19'69 

IRST ESSION Adjourned December 23, 1969 

'S S {Convened JanWlry 1~ 1970 ECOND ESSION 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Prepared under the direr.tion of FRANCIS R. V ALEO, Secretary of the Senate 

By GERALD A. HACKETT, Executive Clerk 

Monday, March 16, 1970 

PENDING EXECUTIVE BUSINESS 

Calendar No. 21. The nomination of GeorgE' Harrold Carswell, of Florida, to be an Associate Justice of the 

Supreme Court of the United States. 

NOMINATIONS 

Date of Calendar Message Name of nommee Office Predecessor 

report No. No. 

SUPREME COURT OF 

THE UNITED STATES 

1970 

Feb. 27 21 1 George Harrold Carswell, An Associate Jmtwe of Abe Fortas, resigned. 

of Florida. the Supreme Court of [Reported favorably 

the United States by Mr. Eastland, 

from the Committee 

on the Judiciary, 

together with indi~ 

vidual views. (See 

Ex. Rept. 91-14, 

91st Cong., 2d 

sess.)) 

[NEW REPORT] 

AMBASSADORS 

Mar. 13 30 43 Stuart W. Rockwell, of Ambassador Extraordinary 

Pennsylvama and Plenipotentiary of 

the United States of 

America to the Kingdom 

of Morocco. 

13 31 52 Findley Burns, Jr., of Ambassador Extraordinary 

Flonda, a Foreign and Plenipotentiary of 

Servwe officer of class 1. the United States of 

America to Ecuador. 

13 32 63 Albert W. Sherer, Jr., of Ambassador Extraordinary 

Ilhnois, a Foreign and Plenipotentiary of 

Service officer of class 1. the United States of 

America to the Republic 

of Guinea. 

37-Q22--70--No. 149 
2 

Date of Calendar Message Name of nominee O:flice Predecessor report No. No. 

AMBASSADORS-Con. 

1970 

Mar. 13 33 72 Clarence Clyde Ferguson, Ambassador Extraordinary 

Jr., of New Jersey and Plenipotentiary of 

the United States of 

America to Uganda. 

OFFICE OF ECONOMIC 

OPPORTUNITY 

13 34 55 Albert E. Abrahams, of An Assistant Director of Genevieve Blatt, 

Maryland. the Office of Economic resigned. 

Opportunity. 

U S GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1910
NINETIETH CONGRESS 

FIRST SESSION-Began January 10, 1967 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

P1'epared undet· the direction of FRANCIS R. VALEO, Secretary of the Senate 

By GERALD A. HACKETT, Executive Clerk 

Monday, September 11, 1967 

UNANIMOUS-CONSENT AGREEMENT 

Ordered, That the Senate proceed to vote on the resolution of ratification of Ex. P (89th Cong., 2d sess.), 

the Treaty of Amity and Economic Relations With Thailand, at 2 o'clock p.m. on Monday, Sept. 11, 1967. 

(Aug. 28, 1967) 

TREATY 

Date of \Calendar Treaty No. Subject Action of committee report No. 

1967 

Aug. 26 20 Ex. P (89th Cong., Treaty of Amity and Economic Relations Reported favorably by 

2d sess.). With Thailand. Mr. Fulbright, from 

the Committee on 

Foreign Relations, 

with a printed report. 

(See Ex. Rept. No. 14, 

90th Cong., 1st sess.) . 

.. 

85- 022--6i--No.88 

U.S. GOVERNMENT I'RIHTING 0 FFICE; I 957
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of Splitrock Services,
Inc. for the three months ended March 31, 2000 and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-1-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          39,187
<SECURITIES>                                        80
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,755
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,479
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                72,703
<PP&E>                                         185,479
<DEPRECIATION>                                  35,086
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 267,255
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           57,073
<BONDS>                                        258,332
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (58,402)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   267,255
<SALES>                                         35,037
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                35,037
<CGS>                                           42,580
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   65,934
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,262
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (37,199)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (37,199)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (37,199)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
SUPREME COURT.

#### The Board of Commissioners of Excise of Chemung County agt. Holmes Harvey.

The “ Act regulating the sale of intoxicating liquors,” passed April 11, 1870, does not deprive a board of commissioners of excise of the power of issuing an execution *against the person^*where an execution has been returned unsatisfied against property, on a judgment for a penalty under the above act.

*Chemung special term, May,*1870.

Motion to set aside an execution against the body of the defendant, issued April *23, 1870,*on a judgment recovered March 8, 1870, for penalties under the excise laws, an execution against property having first been issued and returned unsatisfied.

The motion was based qpon the ground that by the act of the legislature, entitled ‘‘ An act regulating the sale of intoxicating liquors,” passed April 11, 1870, the plaintiff had ceased to exist when the execution was issued, and plaintiff’s counsel therefore had nó power or authority to issue it.

Turner & Dexter, *for the motion.*

John T. Davidson, *opposed.*

Boardman, J.

This motion might be denied upon the ground that the execution against the body of the defendant had never been served; that defendant had never been arrested-thereon. Until the defendant has been subjected to wrong by reason of the issuing of this execution he could not be heard in court on such a motion.

*192But I prefer to consider the question on its merits, and upon such consideration entertain no doubt that the motion must be denied. The act of 1870, (April 11,) does not repeal the act of 1857, but on the contrary, provides, that the same *“*shall be taken and construed as a part of this (1870,) act,” except when inconsistent or in conflict with the new act. This last act is not therefore, in its terms retrospective in its action and does not purport to take away any rights already vested. Even if it were retrospective, it could not deprive plaintiffs of rights vested in them by. virtue of a judgment recovered. *(Pruyn Overseers, &c.,*agt. *Tyler,*18 *How.,*361 ; *Van Rensselaer*agt. *Secor, 32 Barb.,*469; *Berley*agt. *Rampacher,*5 *Duer.,*183; *Butler*agt. *Palmer,*1 *Hill.,*325; *Dwarris on Statutes,*676).

The plaintiff’s rights under this judgment are therefore, unaffected by the act of 1870, and they have a legal existence, and being to enforce such rights, since such condition and power in no way conflicts with the new law, or is in consistent therewith.

For these reasons the motion of the defendant must be denied with $10 costs of motion.
`[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 195 (Tuesday, October 10, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 59448-59459]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-8548]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Transmittal No. 06-71]


36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

[[Page 59449]]


ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text 
of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to 
fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 
July 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. J. Hurd, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 604-
6575.
    The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives, Transmittal 06-71 with attached transmittal, policy 
justification, and Sensitivity of Technology.

    Dated: October 2, 2006.
C.R. Choate,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M

[[Page 59450]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN10OC06.002


[[Page 59451]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN10OC06.003


[[Page 59452]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN10OC06.004


[[Page 59453]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN10OC06.005


[[Page 59454]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN10OC06.006


[[Page 59455]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN10OC06.007


[[Page 59456]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN10OC06.008


[[Page 59457]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN10OC06.009


[[Page 59458]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN10OC06.010


[[Page 59459]]


[FR Doc. 06-8548 Filed 10-6-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-C`
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002**

 

**(18 U.S.C. 1350)**

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18U.S.C. 1350), the undersigned officer of Elephant Talk Communications Corp., a California corporation (the “Company”),does hereby certify, to the best of such officer’s knowledge and belief, that:

 

(1)           TheQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012 (the “Form 10-Q”) of the Company fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all materials respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof the Company.

 

 

This certification shall not be deemed “filed” forpurposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certificationwill not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Securities Exchange Act.
# EUR-Lex - 12008E/AFI/DCL/46 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008E/AFI/DCL/46

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - DECLARATIONS annexed to the Final Act of the Intergovernmental Conference which adopted the Treaty of Lisbon, signed on 13 December 2007 - B. DECLARATIONS CONCERNING PROTOCOLS ANNEXED TO THE TREATIES - 46. Declaration on Article 5(3) of the Protocol on the Schengen **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0352 - 0352 *

46. Declaration on Article 5(3) of the Protocol on the Schengen acquis integrated into the framework of the European Union

The Conference recalls that if the Council does not take a decision after a first substantive discussion of the matter, the Commission may present an amended proposal for a further substantive re-examination by the Council within the deadline of 4 months.

--------------------------------------------------
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 677 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide for the deductibility 

of charitable contributions to certain organizations for members of the 

Armed Forces. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 7, 2023 

Mr. CASSIDY (for himself and Ms. DUCKWORTH) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide 

for the deductibility of charitable contributions to certain 

organizations for members of the Armed Forces. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘VSO Equal Tax Treat5 ment Act’’ or the ‘‘VETT Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEDUCTIBILITY OF CHARITABLE CONTRIBUTIONS 

7 TO CERTAIN ORGANIZATIONS FOR MEMBERS 

8 OF THE ARMED FORCES. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 677 IS

1 (1) DEFINITION OF A CHARITABLE CONTRIBU2 TION.—Section 170(c) of the Internal Revenue Code 

3 of 1986 is amended by inserting after paragraph (5) 

4 the following new paragraph: 

5 ‘‘(6) An organization described in section 

6 501(c)(19) that is a federally chartered corpora7 tion.’’. 

8 (2) PERCENTAGE LIMITATION.—Section 

9 170(b)(1)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 

10 is amended by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of clause 

11 (viii), by adding ‘‘or’’ at the end of clause (ix), and 

12 by adding at the end the following new clause: 

13 ‘‘(x) an organization described in sec14 tion 501(c)(19) that is a federally char15 tered corporation,’’. 

16 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

17 this section shall apply with respect to taxable years begin18 ning after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
#### § 1256.102 What fees does NARA charge?

Copies of audiovisual records will only be provided under this subpart upon payment of fees in accordance with 44 U.S.C. 2116(c) and 22 U.S.C. 1461(b)(3). *See* § 1258.4(b) for additional information.
§ 1192.115 Interior circulation, handrails and stanchions. ( a ) Where provided, handrails or stanchions within the passenger compartment shall be placed to permit sufficient turning and maneuvering space for wheelchairs and other mobility aids to reach a seating location, complying with § 1192.125(d), from an accessible entrance. The diameter or width of the gripping surface of interior handrails and stanchions shall be 11 ⁄ 4 inches to 11 ⁄ 2 inches or shall provide an equivalent gripping surface. Handrails shall be placed to provide a minimum 11 ⁄ 2 inches knuckle clearance from the nearest adjacent surface.
( b ) Where provided, handrails and stanchions shall be sufficient to permit safe boarding, on-board circulation, seating and standing assistance, and alighting by persons with disabilities.
( c ) At entrances equipped with steps, handrails or stanchions shall be provided in the entrance to the car in a configuration which allows passengers to grasp such assists from outside the car while starting to board, and to continue using such assists throughout the boarding process, to the extent permitted by 49 CFR part 231.
COA# 08-14-00026-CR

Antonio Mejia Ruiz v. The

STYLE: State of Texas

COA DISPOSITION: Affirm

7$1*fS«p

OFFENSE: 21.1

COUNTY: Collin

TRIAL COURT: 296th District Court

DATE: 5/29/2015 Publish: No TC CASE #: 296-82375-2012

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

ELECTRONIC RECORD

Antonio Mejia Ruiz v. The State

STYLE: of Texas

APPELLANT^ Petition

FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS:

DATE: /pjl/f/j#/r

JUDGE: C(jAju&41~-

CCA#:

CCA Disposition:

DATE:

JUDGE:.

SIGNED:

PUBLISH:

REHEARING IN CCA IS:

JUDGE:

ni±j£L

PC:

DNP:

MOTION FOR
# 1989 Executive Calendars

**

----

   The Executive Calendar is published by the Executive Clerk’s office in the Office of the Secretary of the Senate. The calendar is published each day the Senate is in session. These calendars list executive business items such as unanimous consent agreements, resolutions, treaties, and nominations. The calendar is identified by the date published and a volume number, which both appear on the cover of the calendar. A final calendar is published at the end of each session of Congress. For a detailed summary of the sections of the Executive Calendar, see, About the Executive Calendar.
BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

In the Matter of )

Care in Action, Inc., et al. – 

Recommendation to Rescind Reason to 

Believe Findings, Close the File, and 

Approve Appropriate Letters 

(Memorandum from Chairman Sean J. 

Cooksey)

)

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

MUR 7537

CERTIFICATION

I, Vicktoria J. Allen, recording secretary of the Federal Election Commission executive 

session, do hereby certify that on February 06, 2024, the Commission took the following actions 

in the above-captioned matter: 

1. Decided by a vote of 6-0 to: 

Instruct the Commission Secretary to amend the certification of 

February 2, 2024 in MUR 7537 to include Commissioner 

Broussard’s vote as approving. 

Commissioners Broussard, Cooksey, Dickerson, Lindenbaum, Trainor, and Weintraub 

voted affirmatively for the decision. 

2. Decided by a vote of 6-0 to: 

Instruct the Commission Secretary to amend the certification of 

February 2, 2024in MUR 7537 to include Commissioner 

Weintraub’s vote as approving. 

Commissioners Broussard, Cooksey, Dickerson, Lindenbaum, Trainor, and Weintraub 

voted affirmatively for the decision. 

MUR753700168
Federal Election Commission Page 2 

Certification for MUR 7537 

February 6, 2024

 Attest:

February 6, 2024

 Date Vicktoria J. Allen

Deputy Secretary of the Commission

MUR753700169
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
condensed consolidated financial statements contained in the Company's quarterly
report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2000 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements:
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           1,479
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       70
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,549
<PP&E>                                          13,915
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  15,464
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           64,644
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       350,909
<OTHER-SE>                                   (400,089)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    15,464
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (32,728)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (32,728)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (32,728)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    ($0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  ($0.01)


</TABLE>