alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1172.11 Rules against age discrimination. The rules stated in this section are limited by the exceptions contained in § 1172.12. ( a ) *General rule.* No person in the United States shall, on the basis of age, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under, any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.
( b ) *Specific rules.* A recipient may not, in any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance, directly or through contractual, licensing, or other arrangements use age distinctions or take any other actions which have the effect, on the basis of age, of: ( 1 ) Excluding individuals from, denying them the benefits of, or subjecting them to discrimination under, a program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance, or
( 2 ) Denying or limiting individuals in their opportunity to participate in any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.
( c ) The specific forms of age discrimination listed in paragraph (b) of this section do not necessarily constitute a complete list of discriminatory actions.
~ruatr nf t4r luitr~ ~tatrs NINETIETH CONGRESS 

FIRST SESSION {Convened January ro, rg67 

Adjourned December 15, 1967 

SECOND SESSION {C~nvcned January 15, rg68 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Prepared under the direction of FRANCIS R. VALEO, Secretary of the Senate 

By GERALD A. HACKETT, Executive Clerk 

Thursday, May 9, 1968 

NOMINATIONS 

Date of Calendar Message Name of nominee Ol:llce Predeceu« 

report No. No 

DEPARTMENT OF 

HEALTH, EDUCATION, 

AND WELFARE 

1968 

May 3 293 74 W1lbur J. Cohen, of Michi-e Secretary of Health, Edugan. cation, and Welfare. 

DEPARTMENT OF THE 

TREASURY 

3 294 36 John R. Petty, of New An Assistant Secretary of Winthrop Knowlton. 

3 295 59-1 

3 296 59-2 

3 297 59-3 

3 298 59-4 

85-Q22--68--No. 153 

York. the Treasury. 

TAX COURT OF THE 

UNITED STATES 

William M. Drennen, of 

West V1rginia. 

W11liam M. Fay, of 

Pennsylvania. 

C. Moxley Featherston, of 

V1rgima. 

Charles R. Simpson, of 

!llinOlS. 

A JUdge of the Tax Court of Reappointment. 

the United States for the 

term of 12 years from 

June 2, 1968. ____ _ do _______ ------------ Do. 

_____ do ____________ ------- Do. 

_____ do___________________ Do. 
2 

Date of Calendar Message N:une o! nommee Office I Predecessor 

report No. No. 

DEPARTMENT OF 

STATE 

19,8 

George W. Ball, of New The representative of the MllfY 7 299 128 

York. United States of America 

to the United Nations 

with the rank and status 

of Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary, and the representative of the United States 

of America in the Security 

Council of the United 

Nations. 

7 300 75 Frank E. McKinney, of Ambassador Extraordinary 

Indiana. and Plenipotentiary of 

the United States of 

America to Spain. 

7 301 113 G. Mennen Williams, of Ambassador Extraordinary 

Michigan. and Plenipotentiary of the 

United States of America 

I 

to the Philippines. 

NOMINATIONS PLACED ON THE SECRETARY'S DESK 

In the Diplomatic and Foreign Service 

The nominations beginning Donald C. Bergus, to be a Foreign Service officer of class 1, and ending Miss 

Joanna W. Witzel, to be a Foreign Service officer of class 6 and a consular officer of the United States of America, 

which nominations were received by the Senate and appeared in the Congressional Record on Mar. 12, 1968. 

U S. GOVERNMENT PRIHTINQ OIFICE JiU
SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

ONE HUNDRED THIRD CONGRESS 

Convened January 5, 1993 

FIRST SESSION { 

SECOND SESSION { 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Thursday, April 1, 1993 

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF WALTER J. STEWART, 

SECRETARY OF THE SENATE 

By Gerald A. Hackett, Executive Clerk 
UNANIMOUS CONSENT AGREEMENT 

Ordered, That when the Senate turns to the consideration of the nomination of Strobe 

Talbott to be Ambmador at Large and Special Advtser to the Secretary of State on the 

New Independent States (Cal. No. 53), there be 40 minutes of debate, equally divided 

between the Chairman of the Committee on Foreign Relattons (Mr. Pell) or his des1gnee and 

the Senator from Arizona (Mr. McCam); that at the conclusion or yieldmg back of time, a 

vote occur on the nommat1on, without any 1n tervening action; that the motion to 

reconsider the vote be laid upon the table; that the President be 1D1Dledtately notified of 

the action of the Senate; and that the Senate return to legislative session. 

(Wednesday, March 31, 1993) 
Treacy I 

Doc. No. 

1 

TREATIES 

Subject Reported 

By 
Calendar Memge 

No. No. 

• 53 110 

• 57 139 

58 147 

• 59 99 

2 

NO MINA TIO NS 

Nominee, Office, And Predecessor 

DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

Strobe Talbott, of Ohio, to be Ambassador 

at Large and Special Adviser to the 

Secretary of State on the New Independent 

States. 

[NEW REPORTS] 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

John M. Deutcb, of Massachusetts, to be 

Under Secretary of Defense for 

AcqulSltion. vice Donald Jay Yockey, 

resigned. 

NAVY 

The following named officer to be placed on 

the retired llst in the grade indicated 

under the provisions of Title 10, United 

States Code, Section 1370: 

to be Vice Admiral 

Vice Adm. Roger F. Bacon, - U. S. Navy. 

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND 

URBAN DEVELOPMENT 

Terrence R. Duvernay, Sr .. of Georgia, to 

be Deputy Secretary of Housing and Urban 

Development, vice Alfred A. DelliBovi. resigned. 

Reported 

BY 

Mar 25, 93 Mr. Pell, 

C.Ommittee on Foreign 

Relations, without printed 

report 

Mar 31. 93 Mr. Nunn, 

Committee on Armed 

Services, without printed 

report 

Do. 

Mar 31. 93 Mr. Riegle, 

Committee on Banking, 

Housing, and Urban Affairs 

Without printed report. 
3 

Calendar Message Nommee. Off>CC. And Predeceaor Reported 

• 

No. No. Bv 

DSPARTMSMT or BOUSIMG AllD 

URBAN DKVELOPNDIT -- Con. 

60 104 Jean Nolan, or Maryland. to be an Aailtant Mar 31, 93 Mr. Riec}e. 

Secretary of HOUSUll and Urban Commit1et on Bankmg. 

Development. vice Mary Shannon Brunette. Housmi. and Urt.n Affairs. 

without i>riated reootL 

•Signi f ies nomlnH's commltrrwnt to r11spond to rt1que$ts to •PPH' IN'KI tt1$tdy befor11 ~ duly 

constl tuttKJ comml ttH of the 5'tnate.
EXHIBIT 31.2 RULE 13a-14(a)
CERTIFICATION I,
Jane Morlok, certify that: 1.          I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Breda Telephone Corp.; 2.          Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3.          Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4.          The
small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have: (a)
  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
  controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
  material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
  consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
  entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
  prepared;(b)
  Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure
  controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about
  the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
  the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(c)
  Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal
  control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
  issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth
  fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected,
  or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers
  internal control over financial reporting; and 5.          The
small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small
business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions): (a)
  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
  operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
  likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record,
  process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)
  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
  employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal
  control over financial reporting.  Date:  May
  14, 2007.
  /s/ Jane MorlokJane Morlok,
          Chief Financial Officer E-12
§ 9.110 What are the purposes and functions of NPS operating standards? ( a ) You must comply with all operating standards in §§ 9.111 through 9.116, as well as with the standards in §§ 9.117 and 9.118, if applicable. The standards apply only to operations that occur within a System unit, including downhole activities, and do not apply to surface activities located outside a System unit. These operating standards are incorporated into the terms and conditions of your operations permit. Violation of these operating standards will subject you to the prohibitions and penalties provisions of §§ 9.180 through 9.182.
( b ) NPS operating standards are applied to ensure protection of federally owned or administered lands, waters, and resources of System units, visitor uses and experiences, and visitor and employee health and safety. The operating standards give us and the operator flexibility to consider using alternative methods, equipment, materials design, and conduct of operations.
( c ) In applying standards to a particular operation, you must use technologically feasible, least damaging methods to protect federally owned or administered lands, waters, and resources of System units, visitor uses and experiences, and visitor and employee health and safety.
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

Academic StandardsBeginning ReadingPhonicsPrimary EducationReading InstructionState StandardsWhole Language Approach

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

ONE HUNDRED SECOND CONGRESS 

FIRST SESSION { 

Convened January 3, 1991 

Adjourned January 3, 1992 

Convened January 3, 1992 

SECOND SESSION { 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Tuesday, April 28, 1992 

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF WALTER J. STEWART, 

SECRETARY OF THE SENATE 

By Gerald A. Hackett, Executive Clerk 
1 

TREATIES 

Calendar Treaty Subject Reported 

No. Doc. No. By 

1 EX. B., Two Related Protocols to the Convention for Feb 5 91 Reported favorably 

95-1 the Unification of Certain Rules Relating by Mr. Pell, Committee on 

to International Carriage by Air, as Foreign Relations, with a 

Amended (Montreal Aviation Protocols No. 3 resolution of advice and 

and 4). consent to ratification 

with provisos. (Printed 

report--Ex. Rept. 102-1 

together with minority 

views).
§ 1151.33 Employment criteria. ( a ) A recipient may not make use of any employment test or other selection criterion that screens out or tends to screen out handicapped persons or any class of handicapped persons unless: ( 1 ) The test score or other selection criterion, as used by the recipient, is shown to be job-related for the position in question; and
( 2 ) Alternative job-related tests or criteria are unavailable.
( b ) A recipient shall select and administer tests concerning employment so as best to ensure that, when administered to an applicant or employee who has a handicap that impairs sensory, manual, or speaking skills, the test results accurately reflect the applicant's or employee's job skills, aptitude, or other factors relevant to adequate performance of the job in question.
# PAC Table 2

&"Arial,Bold"&10&KFF0000This table was generated on 9/13/23.
#### In the Matter of the Appraisal, under the Transfer Tax Act, of the Estate of Lyman F. Rhoads, Deceased. The Comptroller of the State of New York, Appellant; Alfred S. Hall et al., as Executors and Trustees, et al., Respondents.

*Matter of Rhoads,*120 App. Div. 882, affirmed.

(Argued November 18, 1907;

decided December 3, 1907.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered June 28,1907, which affirmed an order of the New York County Surrogate’s Court declaring the estate of Lyman F. Rhoads, deceased, exempt from a transfer tax.

*Fdmond C. Alger*and *Charles M. Russell*for appellant.

*William H. Hamilton*for respondents.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ. Absent: O’Brien, J.
Exhibit
      32.2









CERTIFICATION
      OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Annual Report of Peoples Bancorp (the “Company) on Form 10-K
      for the period ending September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Maurice F. Winkler
      III, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002 and in connection with this Annual Report on Form 10-K that:




1.
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and


2.
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the Company’s financial condition and results of
                operations.


December
                20, 2007
            
            By:
            /s/
                Steven H. CaryerSteven
                H. Caryer
              Vice
                President and Chief Financial
                Officer
§ 223.140 Scope of debarment. ( a ) *Scope in general.* ( 1 ) Debarment of a purchaser constitutes debarment of all divisions or other organizational elements of the purchaser, unless the debarment decision is limited by its terms to specific divisions, organizational elements, or classes of sales.
( 2 ) The debarring official may extend a debarment decision to include any affiliates of the purchaser, if they are— ( i ) Specifically named and
( ii ) Given written notice of the proposed debarment and provided an opportunity to respond (see § 223.138(b)).
( b ) *Imputing conduct.* For purposes of determining the scope of debarment, conduct may be imputed as follows: ( 1 ) The fraudulent, criminal, or other seriously improper conduct of any officer, director, shareholder, partner, employee, or other individual associated with a purchaser may be imputed to a purchaser when the conduct occurred in connection with the individual's performance of duties for or on behalf of the purchaser, or with the purchaser's knowledge, approval, or acquiescence. The purchaser's acceptance of the benefits derived from the conduct shall be evidence of such knowledge, approval, or acquiescence.
( 2 ) The fraudulent, criminal, or other seriously improper conduct of a purchaser may be imputed to any officer, director, shareholder, partner, employee, or other individual associated with the purchaser who participated in, knew of, or has reason to know of the purchaser's conduct.
( 3 ) The fraudulent, criminal, or other seriously improper conduct of one purchaser participating in a joint venture or similar arrangement may be imputed to other participating purchasers if the conduct occurred for or on behalf of the joint venture or similar arrangement or with the knowledge, approval, or acquiescence of those purchasers. Acceptance of the benefits derived from the conduct shall be evidence of such knowledge, approval or acquiescence.
§ 3.4 For what purposes may my vessel be inspected? ( a ) An authorized person may at any time stop and/or board a vessel to examine documents, licenses or permits relating to operation of the vessel, and to inspect the vessel to determine compliance with regulations pertaining to safety equipment, vessel capacity, marine sanitation devices, and other pollution and noise abatement requirements.
( b ) An authorized person who identifies a vessel being operated without sufficient life saving or firefighting devices, in an overloaded or other unsafe condition, as defined in United States Coast Guard regulations, or in violation of a noise level specified in § 3.15(a) of this part, may direct the operator to suspend further use of the vessel until the condition is corrected.
§ 1153.170 Compliance procedures. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, this section applies to all allegations of discrimination on the basis of handicap in programs or activities conducted by the agency.
( b ) The agency shall process complaints alleging violations of section 504 with respect to employment according to the procedures established by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in 29 CFR part 1613 pursuant to section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 791).
( c ) The Director, Office for Civil Rights, shall be responsible for coordinating implementation of this section. Complaints may be sent to the Office of General Counsel, National Endowment for the Arts, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20506.
( d ) The agency shall accept and investigate all complete complaints for which it has jurisdiction. All complete complaints must be filed within 180 days of the alleged act of discrimination. The agency may extend this time period for good cause.
( e ) If the agency receives a complaint over which it does not have jurisdiction, it shall promptly notify the complainant and shall make reasonable efforts to refer the complaint to the appropriate government entity.
( f ) The agency shall notify the Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board upon receipt of any complaint alleging that a building or facility that is subject to the Architectural Barriers Act of 1968, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4151-4157), or section 502 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended (29 U.S.C. 792), is not readily accessible to and usable by handicapped persons.
( g ) Within 180 days of the receipt of a complete complaint for which it has jurisdiction, the agency shall notify the complainant of the results of the investigation in a letter containing— ( 1 ) Findings of fact and conclusions of law;
( 2 ) A description of a remedy for each violation found; and
( 3 ) A notice of the right to appeal.
( h ) Appeals of the findings of fact and conclusions of law or remedies must be filed by the complainant within 90 days of receipt from the agency of the letter required by § 1153.170(g). The agency may extend this time for good cause.
( i ) Timely appeals shall be accepted and processed by the head of the agency.
( j ) The head of the agency shall notify the complainant of the results of the appeal within 60 days of the receipt of the request. If the head of the agency determines that additional information is needed from the complainant, he or she shall have 60 days from the date of receipt of the additional information to make his or her determination on the appeal.
( k ) The time limits cited in paragraphs (g) and (j) of this section may be extended with the permission of the Assistant Attorney General.
( l ) The agency may delegate its authority for conducting complaint investigations to other Federal agencies, except that the authority for making the final determination may not be delegated to another agency.
[51 FR 22895, 22896, June 23, 1986, as amended at 51 FR 22895, June 23, 1986]
#### § 51.59 Will a leasehold surrender interest be extinguished by expiration or termination of a leasehold surrender interest concession contract or may it be taken for public use?

A leasehold surrender interest may not be extinguished by the expiration or termination of a concession contract and a leasehold surrender interest may not be taken for public use except on payment of just compensation. Payment of leasehold surrender interest value pursuant to this part will constitute the payment of just compensation for leasehold surrender interest within the meaning of this part and for all other purposes.
[No. 1533.]

#### Eskridge v. Avery.

Appellate Practice — Pistdings oe Tbial Court.

The findings of fact hy the trial court upon conflicting evidence are conclusive upon the appellate court.

*Appeal from the District Court of Arapahoe County.*

Messrs. Talbot, Denison & Wadley and Messrs. Ward & Ward, for appellant.

Messrs. Thomas, Bryant & Lee, for appellee.

*543Thomson, P. J.

The appellant, a physician, sued the appellee for services as an expert witness for the people at the trial of a criminal prosecution against one Frank W. Millington and another. The complaint alleged an express contract between the plaintiff and the defendant, whereby the latter promised, in consideration that the former would attend the trial and testify for the prosecution, to pay him $25.00 per day for each day’s attendance in court as such witness. It also averred that in pursuance of the agreement the plaintiff attended at the trial twenty-five days, and testified in the cause, and so became entitled to $625, no part of which had been paid. The answer denied the alleged agreement. The cause was tried by the court, judgment went for the defendant, and the plaintiff appealed.

But one question is presented in argument, and that is whether the evidence supports the judgment. We think it would be difficult to deduce the agreement alleged by the plaintiff, or, for that matter, any other agreement, from his testimony. But the defendant, as a witness for himself, squarely and unequivocally denied the agreement alleged, and, even conceding that it was sworn to by the plaintiff exactly as the complaint stated it, the conclusion upon the facts reached by the court, in whose presence the witnesses testified, is a finality here. *Johnson v. Kountz,*21 Colo. 486; *Miller v. Thorpe,*4 Colo. App. 559.

Like actions were also brought against the defendant by Samuel A. Fisk and Edmund J. A. Rogers. Those cases were consolidated with this case, and the three were tried together. The evidence was the same in all,-the same judgment was rendered in each, and all the judgments are affirmed.

*Affirmed.*
#### § 1222.2 What definitions apply to this part?

See § 1220.18 of this subchapter for definitions of terms used in part 1222.