alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1254.34 What are my responsibilities when using documents? ( a ) You must sign for the documents you receive and we may require you to show your researcher identification card.
( b ) You are responsible for the proper handling of and prevention of damage to all documents delivered to you until you return them. Specific handling instructions are given in §§ 1254.36 and 1254.38.
( c ) When you finish using the documents, you must return them to the research room attendant.
( d ) You must not remove the reference service slip that accompanies the documents to the research room.
( e ) If we ask, you must return documents up to 15 minutes before closing time.
( f ) Before leaving a research room, even for a short time, you must notify the research room attendant and place all documents in their proper containers.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5217 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5217

  To repeal the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 (Public Law 101-549).

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 6, 1994

  Mr. DeLay introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To repeal the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 (Public Law 101-549).

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF CLEAN AIR ACT AMENDMENTS OF 1990.

    Public Law 101-549 is hereby repealed.
                                 <all>
```
§ 1238.20 How must microform records be stored? ( a ) *Permanent and unscheduled records.* Agencies must store permanent and unscheduled microform records under the extended term storage conditions specified in ISO 18911 and ANSI/PIMA IT9.2 (both incorporated by reference, see § 1238.5), except that the relative humidity of the storage area must be a constant 35 percent RH, plus or minus 5 percent. Non-silver copies of microforms must be maintained in a different storage area than are silver gelatin originals or duplicate copies).
( b ) *Temporary records.* Agencies must store temporary microform records under conditions that will ensure their preservation for their authorized retention period. NARA suggests that agencies may consult Life Expectance (LE) guidelines in ISO 18901 (incorporated by reference, see § 1238.5).
```

[Federal Register: January 27, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 17)]
[Rules and Regulations]               
[Page 4269]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr27ja10-5]                         


[[Page 4269]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2009-0706; Airspace Docket No. 09-ASO-26]

 
Establishment of Class E Airspace; Lewisport, KY

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action confirms the effective date of a direct final rule 
published in the Federal Register September 14, 2009 that establishes 
Class E Airspace at Hancock Co.--Ron Lewis Field, Lewisport, KY.

DATES: Effective Date: 0901 UTC, January 27, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Melinda Giddens, Operations Support 
Group, Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation Administration, P.O. 
Box 20636, Atlanta, Georgia 30320; telephone (404) 305-5610.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Confirmation of Effective Date

    The FAA published this direct final rule with a request for 
comments in the Federal Register on September 14, 2009 (74 FR 46896), 
Docket No. FAA-2009-0706; Airspace Docket No. 09-ASO-26. The FAA uses 
the direct final rulemaking procedure for a non-controversial rule 
where the FAA believes that there will be no adverse public comment. 
This direct final rule advised the public that no adverse comments were 
anticipated, and that unless a written adverse comment, or a written 
notice of intent to submit such an adverse comment, were received 
within the comment period, the regulation would become effective on 
December 17, 2009. No adverse comments were received, and thus this 
notice confirms that effective date.

    Issued in College Park, Georgia, on January 15, 2010.
Myron A. Jenkins,
Acting Manager, Operations Support Group, Eastern Service Center, Air 
Traffic Organization.
[FR Doc. 2010-1365 Filed 1-26-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
National Party Non-Federal Activity

 Through The Complete Two- Year Election Cycle

2002 2000 1998 1996 1994 1992 2002 2000 1998 1996 1994 1992

Democratic National Committee Republican National Committee

 Receipts $94,564,827 $136,563,419 $56,966,353 $101,905,186 $43,923,516 $31,356,076 Receipts $113,928,997 $166,207,843 $74,805,286 $113,127,010 $44,870,758 $35,936,945

 Disbursements $97,011,665 $135,332,105 $57,411,879 $100,483,977 $45,097,098 $28,388,869 Disbursements $118,730,034 $163,521,510 $74,325,722 $114,401,973 $42,413,166 $33,601,431

Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee National Republican Senatorial Committee

 Receipts $95,049,520 $63,717,982 $25,880,538 $14,176,392 $372,448 $566,111 Receipts $66,426,117 $44,652,709 $37,866,845 $29,395,329 $5,582,013 $9,064,167

 Disbursements $96,890,473 $63,300,415 $25,858,673 $14,061,273 $416,743 $506,362 Disbursements $66,923,043 $44,633,117 $37,283,103 $29,362,653 $6,527,505 $7,655,641

Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee National Republican Congressional Committee

 Receipts $56,446,802 $56,702,023 $16,865,410 $12,340,824 $5,113,343 $4,368,980 Receipts $69,677,506 $47,295,736 $26,914,059 $18,530,773 $7,371,097 $6,076,321

 Disbursements $56,764,345 $57,997,220 $16,617,533 $11,822,790 $5,135,552 $4,017,579 Disbursements $73,267,494 $52,925,581 $24,092,993 $28,746,879 $4,747,525 $6,209,404

Total Democratic Total Republican

 Receipts $246,061,149 $245,202,519 $92,811,927 $123,877,924 $49,143,460 $36,256,667 Receipts $250,032,620 $249,861,645 $131,615,116 $138,199,706 $52,522,763 $49,787,433

 Disbursements $250,666,483 $244,848,838 $92,987,711 $121,826,562 $50,383,546 $32,878,310 Disbursements $258,920,571 $252,785,565 $127,730,744 $149,658,099 $48,387,091 $46,176,476

(Totals do not include transfers among the committees) (Totals do not include transfers among the committees)
#### § 406.140 Employment.

No qualified handicapped person shall, on the basis of handicap, be subjected to discrimination in employment under any program or activity conducted by the agency. The definitions, requirements, and procedures of section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 791), as established by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in 29 CFR part 1613, shall apply to employment in federally conducted programs or activities.
EXHIBIT 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Robert D. Jenkins, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of Tasker Capital
Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

      (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

      (b) [Intentionally omitted in accordance with SEC Release No. 33-8392]

      (c) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      (d) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

      (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

      (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

August 22, 2005


/s/ Robert D. Jenkins
---------------------
Robert D. Jenkins
Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, I, Robert Boeckman, Chief Operations
Officer and Co-Chief Executive Officer of Breda Telephone Corp., certify that to
my knowledge (i) Breda Telephone Corp.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the
quarter ended March 31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Breda Telephone Corp.

Date: May 13, 2004.

                                       /s/ Robert Boeckman
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Robert Boeckman, Chief Operations Officer
                                       and Co-Chief Executive Officer


                                      E-3
#### § 14.71 Lands subject to grant.

Permission may be given under the Act of February 15, 1901, and the Act of March 4, 1911, for a right-of-way over unsurveyed lands as well as surveyed lands.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 601 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 601

To amend the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 to modify the amount 
  by which the chargeable risk premium rate for flood insurance under 
                 that Act may be increased in any year.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 1, 2023

Mr. Kennedy (for himself and Mr. Rubio) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, 
                           and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 to modify the amount 
  by which the chargeable risk premium rate for flood insurance under 
                 that Act may be increased in any year.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Flood Insurance Affordability Act''.

SEC. 2. ANNUAL LIMITATION ON PREMIUM INCREASES.

    Section 1308(e)(1) of the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 (42 
U.S.C. 4015(e)(1)) is amended, in the matter preceding subparagraph 
(A), by striking ``18 percent'' and inserting ``9 percent''.
                                 <all>
```
FILED 

 U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT 

 08/06/99 

 THOMAS K. KAHN 

 CLERK

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________________

No. 97-4845

________________________________

D.C. Docket No. 94-0147-cv

Bktcy. No. 93-0361

IN RE: LEROY CHARLES GRIFFITH,

Debtor.

LEROY CHARLES GRIFFITH,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________ 

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Florida

_________________________________________________________________

(Opinion May 11 , 1999, ___ F.3d ____, 11th Cir., 1999)

(August 6, 1999)

Before ANDERSON, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA,

BLACK, CARNES, BARKETT, HULL and MARCUS, Circuit Judges.

B Y T H E C O U R T :

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion

of rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in

favor of granting a rehearing en banc,
IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The

previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.eb4845or
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit



## FILED

February 23, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-41386

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSE LIBORIO CISNEROS-JIMENEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

----------------------------------------------------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:04-CR-509-ALL

-----------------------------------------------------------------

Before BARKSDALE, STEWART and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Jose Liborio Cisneros-Jimenez appeals his guilty-plea conviction and sentence for being found

in the United States, without permission, following deportati on. S ee 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), (b). He

contends that the sentencing provisions in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are unconstitutional because they do

not require the fact of a prior felony or aggravated felony conviction to be treated as an element of

the offense and proved beyond a reasonable doubt. Cisneros-Jimenez’s constitutional challenge is-2-

foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States

, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998). Although CisnerosJimenez contends that Almendarez-Torres was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme

Court would overrule Almendarez-Torres in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey

, 530 U.S. 466 (2000),

we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that Almendarez-Torres remains binding.

See United States v. Garza-Lopez

, 410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), cert. denied

, 126 S. Ct. 298 (2005).

Cisneros-Jimenez properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of Almendarez-Torres

and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review. Accordingly, CisnerosJimenez’s conviction is AFFIRMED.

Cisneros-Jimenez also argues that the district court committed reversible error when it

sentenced him pursuant to the mandatory United States Sentencing Guidelines scheme held

unconstitutional in United States v. Booker

, 543 U.S. 220 (2005). By sentencing Cisneros-Jimenez

under a mandatory guidelines regime, the district court committed what this court refers to as Fanfan

error. S ee United States v. Walters

, 418 F.3d 461, 463 (5th Cir. 2005). The Gov e rnment concedes

that Cisneros-Jimenez preserved his Fanfan claim for appellate review, that the district court’s actions

are reviewed for harmless error, and that it cannot show that the error wa s harmless. S ee id. at

463-64. The sentencing transcript supports the Government’s concession. We therefore we

VACATE Cisneros-Jimenez’s sentence and REMAND the case for resentencing.

CONVICTION AFFIRMED; SENTENCE VACATED; CASE REMANDED.
SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

ONE HUNDRED FIRST CONGRESS 

Convened January 3, 1989 

FIRST SESSION { 

SECOND SESSION { 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Tuesday, July 11, 1989 

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF WALTER J.STEWART, 

SECRETARY OF THE SENATE 

By Gerald A Hackett, Executive Clerk 
Unanimous Consent Agreement 

Ordered, That on Tuesday, July 11, 1989, at 9 am., the Senate go mto executive 

session to consider the nommatton of Chic Hecht to be the Umted States Ambassador to 

the Commonwealth of The Bahamas (Cal No 171), and that a vote on the confirmation of the 

nomination occur on Tuesday not later than 7 p m 

(June 21, 1989) 
Calendar 

No. 

* 171 

* 188 

Message 

No. 

326 

194 

1 

NOMINATIONS 

Nominee, Off ice, And Predecessor 

DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

Chic Hecht, of Nevada, to be Ambassador 

Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary of the 

United States of America to the 

Commonwealth of The Bahamas. 

Donald Phinney Gregg, of Maryland, to be 

Ambassador Extraordinary and 

Plenipotentiary of the United States of 

America to the Republic of Korea. 

Reported 

By 

Jun 8, 89 Mr. Pell, 

Committee on Foreign 

Relations, without printed 

report. 

Jun 20, 89 Mr. Pell, 

Committee on Foreign 

Relations, without printed 

report. 

.. *Signifies nommee's commitment to respond to requests to appear and testify before any duly 

constituted committee of the Senate.
§ 9.302 Definitions. The terms used in this subpart shall have the following meaning: ( a ) *AMRAP* means the Alaska Mineral Resource Assessment Program authorized by section 1010 of the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act of 1980 (ANILCA), 16 U.S.C. 3150.
( b ) *AMRAP Activities* means any project, method, technique or other activity incidental to mineral resource assessments conducted by authorized AMRAP agencies or their contractors in units of the National Park System in Alaska pursuant to section 1010 of ANILCA under an approved permit. AMRAP activities include access into, across, through, or over a unit of the National Park System for the conduct of those activities. Only mineral resource assessment methods or techniques that do not result in lasting impacts on park resources and values may be permitted as AMRAP activities. Mineral resource assessment techniques may include aerial photography; remote sensing; hand-sampling of geologic materials; hand-sampling or hand-augering methods for geochemical analyses; and geophysical techniques such as magnetic, electrical, electromagnetic, chemical, radioactive, and gravitational methods. Mineral resource assessment activities may be permitted as long as: ( 1 ) No explosives are used;
( 2 ) They are consistent with § 9.306; and
( 3 ) They are consistent with the provisions of the Wilderness Act of 1964 (16 U.S.C. 1131 *et seq.*) and National Park Service policies concerning wilderness management and the use of motorized equipment in wilderness areas. Core and test drilling, including exploratory drilling of oil and gas test wells, are explicitly prohibited as AMRAP activities in units of the National Park System.
( c ) *AMRAP agencies* means those agencies of the U.S. Department of the Interior that are authorized by the Secretary to perform mineral resource assessment activities pursuant to section 1010 of ANILCA.
( d ) *Superintendent* means the Superintendent, or his/her designee, of the unit of the National Park System in Alaska where AMRAP activities are conducted or proposed to be conducted.
[56 FR 22652, May 16, 1991, as amended at 60 FR 55791, Nov. 3, 1995; 62 FR 30234, June 3, 1997; 81 FR 78005, Nov. 4, 2016]
# Party Table 2

&"Arial,Bold"&KFF0000This table was published on 4/3/15.
SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

ONE HUNDRED FIRST CONGRESS 

FIRST SESSION { 

SECOND SESSION { 

Convened January 3, 1989 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Monday, May 1, 1989 

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF WALTER J.STEWART, 

SECRETARY OF THE SENATE 

By Gerald A. Hackett, Executive Clerk 
1 

NOMINATIONS 

Calendar Message Nominee, Office, And Predecessor Reported 

* 

No. No. Bv 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

63 240 William G. Rosenberg, of Michigan, to be an Apr 18, 89 Mr. Burdick, 

Assistant Administrator of the Committee on Environment 

Environmental Protection Agency, vice J. and Public Works, without 

Craig Potter resi~ed. printed reoort. .. *Sign1f1es nominee's commitment to respond to requests to appear and testify before any duly 

constituted committee of the Senate.
§ 218.1 Purpose and scope. This subpart establishes a predecisional administrative review (hereinafter referred to as “objection”) process for proposed actions of the Forest Service concerning projects and activities implementing land and resource management plans documented with a Record of Decision or Decision Notice, including proposed authorized hazardous fuel reduction projects as defined in the Healthy Forests Restoration Act of 2003 (HFRA). The objection process is the sole means by which administrative review of qualifying projects. ( a ) This subpart A provides the general provisions of the objection process, including who may file objections to proposed projects and activities, the responsibilities of the participants in an objection, and the procedures that apply for review of the objection.
( b ) Subpart B of this part includes provisions that are specific to proposed projects and activities implementing land and resource management plans documented with a Record of Decision or Decision Notice, except those authorized under the HFRA.
( c ) Subpart C of this part includes provisions that are specific to proposed hazardous fuel reduction projects authorized under the HFRA.
§ 1149.24 What happens if my motion to reopen is denied? ( a ) You may appeal the decision denying a motion to reopen to the authority head by filing a notice of appeal with the authority head within 15 days after the ALJ denies the motion. The timely filing of a notice of appeal must stay the initial decision until the authority head decides the issue.
( b ) If you file a timely notice of appeal with the authority head, the ALJ must forward the record of the proceeding to the authority head.
( c ) The authority head must decide promptly, based solely on the record previously before the ALJ, whether extraordinary circumstances excuse your failure to file a timely answer.
( d ) If the authority head decides that extraordinary circumstances excused your failure to file a timely answer, the authority head must remand the case to the ALJ with instructions to grant you an opportunity to answer.
( e ) If the authority head decides that your failure to file a timely answer is not excused, the authority head must reinstate the initial decision of the ALJ, which becomes final and binding upon the parties 30 days after the authority head issues such a decision.