alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 4.12**

**EXECUTION VERSION**

**JOINDER AGREEMENT**

July 23, 2016 

Koninklijke Ahold Delhaize N.V. 

Attn. Jeff Carr, EVP & CFO 

Provincialeweg 11 

1506 MA Zaandam 

The Netherlands 

with a copy to: 

Koninklijke Ahold Delhaize N.V. 

Attn. GSO Legal 

Telephone: +31 88 659 911 

Email: gso.legal@aholddelhaize.com

Attention: Gerbrand van Bokhorst 

and 

Koninklijke Ahold Delhaize N.V. 

Attn. GSO Treasury 

Telephone: +41 22 592 8065 

Facsimile: +41 22 592 8034 

Email: mark.rutteman@aholddelhaize.com

Ladies and Gentlemen: 

Reference ismade to that certain cross-guarantee agreement, dated as of May 21, 2007 (as amended, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time, the “***Cross-Guarantee Agreement***”), by and among Koninklijke Ahold N.V.(“***Ahold***”), a public limited liability company (*naamloze vennootschap*) incorporated under the laws of the Netherlands and having its official seat (*statutaire zetel*) in Zaandam, the Netherlands (as successor ininterest to Delhaize Group NV/SA, a limited liability company (*soci**é**t**é**anonyme*) organized under the laws of the Kingdom of Belgium; Ahold in such capacity, “***DelhaizeSuccessor***”), Delhaize America, Inc., a corporation (now Delhaize America, LLC) wholly-owned by Ahold and organized under the laws of the State of North Carolina (“***Delhaize America***”), and the other direct andindirect wholly-owned Subsidiaries of Ahold Delhaize from time to time parties thereto (collectively with Delhaize Successor and Delhaize America, the “***Guarantors***” and individually, a “***Guarantor***”).

Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in the Cross-Guarantee Agreement. 

This letter supplements the Cross-Guarantee Agreement and is delivered on behalf of the undersigned, Delhaize Le Lion / De Leeuw B.V. (the“***New Guarantor***”), pursuant to 

Section 12.1 of the Cross-Guarantee Agreement. The New Guarantor hereby agrees to be bound as a Guarantor by all of the terms, covenants and conditions set forth in the Cross-GuaranteeAgreement as of the date hereof. Without limiting the foregoing, the New Guarantor hereby makes each of the representations and warranties and agrees to each of the covenants applicable to Guarantors contained in the Cross-Guarantee Agreement. 

This letter shall become effective upon the ratification (*bekrachtiging*) by the New Guarantor of its execution of this letter. 

THIS LETTER SHALL BE GOVERNED BY, AND SHALL BE CONSTRUED AND ENFORCED IN ACCORDANCE WITH, THE LAW OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. 

*[Remainder of page intentionally left blank]*

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the New Guarantor has caused this letter to be executed and delivered by itsduly authorized officer as of the date first above written. 

 

 

 

DELHAIZE LE LION / DE LEEUW B.V.,

as Subsidiary Co-Issuer
 By: 
Koninklijke Ahold Delhaize N.V.,

its proposed sole managing director, in turn represented by:
   
  /s/ G.W. van Bokhorst
     Name: G.W. van Bokhorst     Title: Proxy Holder
 

 

[Signature Page – Joinder Agreement (Cross-Guarantee)]
§ 1239.24 How does NARA conduct an inspection? ( a ) The NARA inspection team leader will coordinate with the agency point of contact to arrange an initial meeting with the agency. The initial meeting will address such matters as the parameters of the inspection, any surveys or other inspection instruments, the offices to be visited, and the timing of site visits.
( b ) After the inspection is complete, NARA will prepare a draft inspection report and transmit it to the agency within 45 calendar days of the last site visit. The report will include: ( 1 ) An executive summary;
( 2 ) Background and purpose of inspection;
( 3 ) Inspection methodology, including offices visited;
( 4 ) Findings;
( 5 ) Corrective actions needed and other recommendations; and
( 6 ) Any necessary appendixes, such as summaries of each site visit or the inspection instrument.
( c ) The draft report is sent to the agency for review, with a response deadline of 45 days.
( d ) NARA will incorporate any necessary corrections or revisions in the final report and issue the report to the head of the agency within 45 days.
#### § 909.102 Application.

This part applies to all programs or activities conducted by the agency.
Total U.S. Exports to  Belize

Data in Thousand Dollars 

Data For  JUN. 1999

|Group                  | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998  | Year to Date 6/1998 | Year to Date 6/1999 | % Change | Year Ending 6/1998 | Year Ending 6/1999 | % Change | % Share
|---------------------- | ---- | ---- | ---- | ----- | ------------------- | ------------------- | -------- | ------------------ | ------------------ | -------- | -------
|TEXTILES & APPAREL     | 8821 | 9387 | 9556 | 10041 | 5264                | 6421                | 21.97    | 9180               | 11197              | 21.98    | 0.07   
|TOTAL APPAREL          | 7766 | 8585 | 8746 | 9013  | 4758                | 5877                | 23.52    | 8323               | 10132              | 21.74    | 0.12   
|TEXTILE MILL PRODUCTS  | 1055 | 802  | 810  | 1028  | 506                 | 544                 | 7.4      | 857                | 1065               | 24.34    | 0.01   
|Yarn                   | 249  | 221  | 320  | 373   | 200                 | 361                 | 80.58    | 328                | 534                | 62.89    | 0.04   
|Fabric                 | 501  | 317  | 212  | 229   | 68                  | 76                  | 12.25    | 177                | 237                | 34.41    | 0      
|Made-Up Arts           | 305  | 263  | 278  | 425   | 239                 | 107                 | -55.21   | 352                | 294                | -16.63   | 0.01   
|M&B Trousers, Shorts   | 7383 | 8462 | 8558 | 8917  | 4718                | 5808                | 23.12    | 8205               | 10008              | 21.97    | 0.81   
|Filament Yarn          |      | 0    | 0    | 7     | 7                   | 212                 | 2961.28  | 7                  | 212                | 2961.28  | 0.05   
|Spun Yrns & Thread     | 249  | 221  | 320  | 366   | 193                 | 148                 | -22.95   | 321                | 322                | 0.37     | 0.04   
|Speclty & Indstrl Fabs | 168  | 12   | 6    | 117   | 0                   | 8                   |          | 3                  | 125                | 3707.26  | 0.01   
|Other Made-Up Articles | 140  | 110  | 219  | 259   | 141                 | 74                  | -47.08   | 226                | 193                | -14.54   | 0.03
&ruutr nf tqr luitrb ~tutrs NINETIETH CONGRESS 

FIRST SESSION-Began January 10, 1967 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Pre pared under the direction of FRANCIS R. V ALEO, Secretary of the Sen&a! 

By GERALD A. HACKETT, Executive Clerk 

Monday, July 24, 1967 

PENDING EXECUTIVE BUSINESS 

Pending when the Senate resumed the consideratiOn of legislative business on Friday, July 21, 1967, was 

a motion by Mr. Williams of Delaware to request the President of the United States to return the resolution 

of confirmation of Simon F . McHugh, Jr., to be a member of the Subversive Activities Control Board to the 

Senate. 

NOMINATIONS 

Date of Calendar Message Name of nominee Office Predeceasor 

report No. No. 

COMMODITY CREDIT 

CORPORATION 

1967 

July 21 938 190 Walter W. Wilcox, of A member of the Board of Nathan M. Koffsky, 

Maryland. Directors of the Commod1ty Credit Corporation. 

DEPARTMENT OF 

JUSTICE 

21 939 251 Warren M. Christopher, of Deputy Attorney GeneraL_ Ramsey Clark. 

Callfornia. 

85--022-67-No. 68 

U 5 GOVERNMENT PRI NTING OFFICE l!i87
§ 907.9 Preparation of an EIS. ( a ) *Notice of intent.* When PADC decides to prepare an environmental impact statement, it shall publish a notice of intent in the Federal Register in accordance with 40 CFR 1501.7 and 1508.22 of the CEQ Regulations.
( b ) *Preparation.* After determining that an environmental impact statement will be prepared and publishing the notice of intent, PADC will begin to prepare or have prepared the environmental impact statement. Procedures for preparing the environmental impact statement are set forth in 40 CFR part 1502, CEQ Regulations.
( c ) *Supplemental environmental impact statements.* PADC may supplement a draft or final environmental impact statement at any time. PADC shall prepare a supplement to either the draft or final environmental impact statement when ( 1 ) substantial changes are proposed to an action contained in the draft or final EIS that are relevant to environmental concerns or there are significant new circumstances or information relevant to environmental concerns and bearing on the proposed action or its impacts; or
( 2 ) actions are proposed which relate or are similar to other action(s) taken or proposed and that together will have a cumulatively significantly impact on the environment.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-4574

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

EDWARD HUCKABEE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. Louise W. Flanagan, 

District Judge. (7:11-cr-00107-FL-1)

Submitted: January 29, 2013 Decided: February 15, 2013

Before KING, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jeffrey M. Brandt, ROBINSON & BRANDT, P.S.C., Covington, 

Kentucky, for Appellant. Thomas G. Walker, United States 

Attorney, Jennifer P. May-Parker, Kristine L. Fritz, Assistant 

United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Edward Huckabee appeals the conviction and forty-five 

month sentence that resulted from his guilty plea to possession 

of a firearm by a convicted felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 

§§ 922(g)(1), 924 (2006). On appeal, he challenges the denial 

of his motion to suppress, arguing that he was unreasonably 

seized in violation of the Fourth Amendment and that any 

evidence resulting from such seizure should have been 

suppressed. We affirm.

Huckabee pleaded guilty without entering a conditional 

guilty plea pursuant to Rule 11(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of 

Criminal Procedure. An unconditional guilty plea generally 

waives all antecedent, nonjurisdictional errors. Tollett v. 

Henderson, 411 U.S. 258, 266–67 (1973). The right to challenge 

on appeal a Fourth Amendment issue raised in a motion to 

suppress is a nonjurisdictional defense and is therefore waived 

by an unconditional guilty plea. Haring v. Prosise, 462 U.S. 

306, 320 (1983). Thus, as the Government asserts, Huckabee 

waived his right to challenge on appeal the denial of the motion 

to suppress.

Accordingly, we affirm Huckabee's conviction. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

In the Estate of Ramona Ledezma,

Deceased

,

Appellant

. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 2 3

- 00 01 9

- CV

Appeal from the

County Court at Law No . 2

of W ebb County, Texas

(TC# 2021

- PB

- 9000076

- L2 )

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Court Reporter ’ s second request for an extension of time within

which to file the Reporter ’ s Record until Febr uary 24 , 20 2 3

. NO FURTHER REQUESTS

FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE THE REPORTER ’ S RECORD WILL BE

CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that Roxann G. Soto

- Se rna , Court Reporter for the county Court

at

La w No

. 2 for Webb County, Texas, prepare the Reporter ’ s Record for the above styled and

numbered cause, and forward the same to this Court on or before February 24 , 202 3

.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 25 th day of Ja nuary , 20 2 3

.

PER CURIAM

Before Rodrig uez , C.J., Palafox

, and Soto

, JJ.
Date of 

report 

----

1969 

Jan. 28 

28 

28 

28 

28 

28 

28 

28 

~ruatr nf tqr luitt~ ittttts 

NINETY-FIRST CONGRESS 

FIRST SESSION {Convened January 3, zg6g 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Prepared under the direction of FRANCIS R. V ALEO, Secretary of the Senate 

By GERALD A. HACKETT, Executive Clerk 

Wednesday, January 29, 1969 

NOMINATIONS 

Calendar Message Name of nominee Office Predecessor 

No. No. 

COUNCIL OF 

ECONOMIC ADVISERS 

182 77 Paul W. McCracken, of A member of the Council 

Michigan. of Economic Advisers. 

183 86 Hendrik S. Houthakker, of ____ do ___________________ 

Massachusetts. 

184 87 Herbert Stein, of Maryland. _____ do ___________________ 

DEPARTMENT OF 

DEFENSE 

185 62 Robert F. Froehlke, of An Assistant Secretary of 

Wisconsin. Defense. 

186 91 Barry James Shillito, of _____ do ___________________ 

Ohio. 

187 63 Robert C. Seamans, Jr., of Secretary of the Air Force._ 

Massachusetts. 

188 64 John H. Chafee, of Rhode Secretary of theN avy ______ 

Island. 

OFFICE OF 

EMERGENCY 

PREPAREDNESS 

189 65 George A. Lincoln, of Director of the Office of 

Michigan. Emergency Preparedness. 

98-022--69--No.S 
2 

Date or Calendar Messag~ Name of nommee Office Predecessor 

report No. No; 

MILITARY ST AI!'F 

COMMITTEE, 

UNITED NATIONS 

t!Jt,'/1 

.Jan. :.!S IHO -IS Lt. Cl'n. John W. R<'nior Air Forer member, 

CarpPntpr Ill, FRI 647 Military Rtaff Com-

(major gem•ral, Regular mitte<', United NationH. 

Air Force), U.S. Air 

Force, nuder the provision~ of ~E'C. 711, tit k 

10, of the United 

Htatr~ Code. 

u.s. NAVY 

For appointment to the 

grade indicnted on the retiil'd [i,t, pur~nant to title 

10, l'nitPd Stutt>s Code, 

bCC'. 5233: 

2b J!ll 4\l \'icP Adm. Charks T. Vice admiraL _____________ 

Booth II. 

2~ 1!11 49 Rear Aflm. Paul P. Black- _____ do ___________________ 

burn, Jr. 

CIVIL SERVICE 

COMMISSION 

28 HJ2 75 ,Jam<'' E. John,on, of Cali- A Civil SC'rvicc• Cornmb- .John \ilfllliarns 1\Iac~-, 

fornia. sioncr for the remainder Jr., rrsigned. 

of the term expiring 

1\br. 1, 1971. 

US GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1959
§ 59.4 Residency requirements. ( a ) *Background.* Section 6(f)(8) of the L&WCF Act prohibits discrimination on the basis of residence, including preferential reservation or membership systems, except to the extent that reasonable differences in admission and other fees may be maintained on such basis. This prohibition applies to both regularly scheduled and special events. The general provisions regarding non-discrimination at sites assisted under Interior programs and, thereby, all other recreation facilities managed by a project sponsor, are covered in 43 CFR part 17 which implements the provisions of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 for the Department.
( b ) *Policy.* There shall be no discrimination for L&WCF assisted programs and services on the basis of residence, except in reasonable fee differentials. Post-completion compliance responsibilities of the recipient should continue to ensure that discrimination on the basis of residency is not occurring.
( c ) *Fees.* Fees charged to nonresidents cannot exceed twice that charged to residents. Where there is no charge for residents but a fee is charged to nonresidents, nonresident fees cannot exceed fees charged for residents at comparable State or local public facilities. Reservation, membership, or annual permit systems available to residents must also be available to nonresidents and the period of availability must be the same for both residents and nonresidents. Recipients are prohibited from providing residents the option of purchasing annual or daily permits while at the same time restricting nonresidents to the purchase of annual permits only. These provisions apply only to the approved 6(f)(3) areas applicable to the recipient. Nonresident fishing and hunting license fees are excluded from these requirements.
12-i 

CHAPTER 12. CUSTOMER SUBGROUP ANALYSIS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

12.1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 12-1

12.2 IMPACTS OF PURCHASE PRICE ................................................................................. 12-1
12-1 

CHAPTER 12. CUSTOMER SUBGROUP ANALYSIS

12.1 INTRODUCTION

The customer subgroup analysis evaluates impacts on identifiable groups of customers 

who may be disproportionately affected by a national energy efficiency standard. The U.S.

Department of Energy (DOE) conducts the customer subgroup analysis in preparation for the 

notice of proposed rulemaking. DOE will conduct this analysis, in part, by analyzing the lifecycle cost (LCC) and payback periods (PBPs) for customers who fall into an identifiable group. 

DOE plans to evaluate variations in energy use and energy prices and use that might affect the

net present value of a standard to customer subpopulations. To the extent possible, DOE will

obtain estimates of the variability of each LCC and PBP input parameter and will consider that

variability in calculating customer impacts. DOE plans to perform sensitivity analyses to

consider how differences in energy use will affect subgroups of customers.

DOE will determine effects on customer subgroups using the LCC spreadsheet model, 

which allows for different data inputs. The standard LCC analysis (described in chapter 9 of the

interim technical support document) focuses on various customers purchasing lamps (and related 

equipment) in different sectors and for different building types. DOE will use the spreadsheet 

model to analyze the LCC for any subgroup of customer-type by sampling only that subgroup. In 

the case of high-intensity discharge lamps, some of the subgroups DOE may choose to consider 

are utilities, transportation facilities, and warehouses. 

12.2 IMPACTS OF PURCHASE PRICE

DOE is especially sensitive to increases in equipment purchase prices related to new 

standards. DOE wishes to avoid negative impacts on identifiable population groups that may be 

unable to afford significant increases in equipment price. Because increases in first costs of 

equipment can preclude the purchase of a new model, some customers may retain equipment 

past its useful life. Older equipment is generally less efficient to begin with, and the efficiency of 

such equipment may deteriorate further if it is retained beyond its useful life. Increases in first 

cost also can preclude the purchase of new equipment altogether, resulting in a potentially large 

loss of utility to the customer.
#### § 17.3 Lands subject to disposition.

The Act is applicable to any Federally owned real property acquired by the Secretary from non-Federal sources within any unit of the National Park System other than national parks and those national monuments of scientific significance. No leasehold or freehold conveyance shall be made except as to lands which the General Management Plan for the particular unit of the National Park System has designated as a Special Use Zone for the uses that are permitted by the freehold or leasehold conveyance. No leasehold or freehold conveyance shall be made unless the lands have been surveyed for natural, historical, and cultural values and a determination made by the Secretary that such leasehold or freehold conveyance will not be inconsistent with any natural, historical, or cultural values found on the land. Any conveyances affecting properties listed or eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places must be reviewed by the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation. Procedures for obtaining the Council's comments appear at 36 CFR part 800, “Procedures for the Protection of Historic and Cultural Resources.”

[42 FR 46302, Sept. 15, 1977, as amended at 43 FR 3360, Jan. 25, 1978]
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 201 (Wednesday, October 18, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 61462]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-8786]



[[Page 61462]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

Time and Date: Thursday, October 26, 2006, 10 a.m.

Place: Room 420, Bethesda Towers, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, 
Maryland.

Status: Open to the Public.

Matter to Be Considered: Portable Generators:
    Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPR).
    The staff will brief the Commission on issues related to an advance 
notice of proposed rulemaking for portable generators.
    For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, 
call (301) 504-7948.

Contact Person for More Information: Todd A. Stevenson, Office of the 
Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West 
Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814 (301) 504-7923.

    Dated: October 16, 2006.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 06-8786 Filed 10-16-06; 2:45pm]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-M
# CongressionalCandidate Table 6b
#### § 72.40 Historic properties.

Properties listed in or determined eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places must be treated in accordance with the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation procedures described in 36 CFR 800, “Protection of Historic and Cultural Properties.” Applicants must identify such properties in the preapplication if they are situated at a UPARR grant site.
~ruatr nf tqt luitrb ~tatrs NINETY-FIRST CONGRESS 

F S {

Convened January 3, 1969 

IRST ESSION 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Prepared under the direction of FRANCIS R. VALEO, Secretary of the Senate 

By GERALD A. HACKETT, Executive Clerk 

Tuesday, April 29, 1969 

NOMINATIONS 

Date of f Calendar I Message Name of nommee Office Predecessor 

report No. No. 

--I 

POST OFFICE 

I DEPARTMENT 

196.9 I 

Apr. 25 297 

I 

325 Il onry Lohno, of An Assist:1nt Postmaster 

Mass.:~chusetts General. 

25 298 327 Frank J. Nunlisi, of New _____ do ___________________ 

Jersey. 

25 299 :326 Ronald B. Lcr•, of _____ do ___________________ 

Maryland. 

DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC 

ROADS 

25 300 293 Ralph R. Bartelsmever, of Director of Public Roads __ -

Illinois. 

CIVIL SERVICE 

COMMISSION 

25 301 305 L. J. Andolsek, of A C1vil Service CommisMinnesota. sioner for the term of 6 

years expiring J\lar. 1, 

1975. 

NEW ENGLAND 

REGIONAL 

COMMISSION 

25 302 272 Stewart Lamprey, of New Fedoml cochairman of the 

Hampshire. New :D;ngland Regional 

Commission. 

98-022--69--No.27 

U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1969