alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
p. 1 

E~ t`_~r ~` . ~ 

January 12, 2010 1, 0 JAN 19 

TSCA Document Control Office (7407M) 

Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics 

U .S . Environmental Protection Agency 

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20460-0001 

Attn: TSCA Section 4 

I NVI STA7 

INVISTA S.d r.l . 

4600 Highway 421 North 

Wilmington, NC 28401 

PO Box 327 

Wilmington, NC 28402 

Tel: 910-341-5500 

Fax : 910-341-3171 

www.invista .com 

Re: Application for Exemption from TSCA Section 4 Testing: para-Xylene, CAS No. 106-42-3 

Dear Sir/Madam : 

Pursuant to 40 C.F .R. Sections 790 .80, 790.82 and 799.5115(d)(i), INVISTA S.a r .l . (INVISTA) submits 

this application for an exemption from the requirement to perform testing pursuant to a TSCA Section 4 

test rule. 

Following is information relevant to this exemption application: 

Test Rule and Chemical : The test rule is captioned "Chemical testing requirements for certain 

chemicals of interest to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration  and is codified at 40 

C.F .R. 799.5115. Para-xylene is subject to this test rule and has CAS number 106-42-3 . ~ _ 

INVISTA first imported para-xylene on September 29, 2007 . 

Testing Requirements from which Exemption is Requested: INVISTA seeks an exemptiortfrom 

the requirements to perform the testing specified in this test rule, because another organi2altion 

(para-Xylene Dermal Absorption Task Group of the American Chemistry Council) already lias 

performed the required testing and submitted the test results to EPA. See 71 Fed. Reg. 1fi38- : 

1540 (Jan. 10, 2006). .' 

Company Address and Telephone Number: INVISTA S.a r.l ., P.O. Box 327, Wilmington, N~ h 

Carolina 28402; Telephone 910-341-5500. 

Individual Contact Person : Bill Lesko, TSCA Program Manager, Environmental Health and Safety, 

INVISTA S.a r.l ., INVISTA Building, 4123 East 37"' Street North, Wichita, Kansas 67220; 

Telephone 316-828-1470. 

I understand that if this application is granted before the reimbursement period described in section 

4(c)(3)(B) of TSCA expires, I must pay fair and equitable reimbursement to the person or persons 

who incurred or shared in the costs of complying with the requirement to submit data and upon 

whose data the granting of my application was based. 

Please contact me if you have any comments or questions about this exemption application. Thank you. 

Sincerely, 

aAz'_ -- ~ ( 

IIIIIIiIIfIn111911I1ii~liIIIIIIIIp~III~ IlifIlllll 

William King 

Authorized Signatory 

CONTAINS NO CBt 

EHS File : 4.1 .1 ' 4z 17
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED February 23, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-40653 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JOSE FELIX RUBIO-CRUZ, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:04-CR-2303-ALL

-------------------- Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Jose Felix Rubio-Cruz appeals his conviction and sentence for illegal reentry after a previous deportation. Rubio-Cruz argues that the district court plainly erred by enhancing his sentence pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii) based on a Texas conviction for aggravated assault. Rubio-Cruz contends that the enhancement is improper because the Texas aggravated assault statute may be violated by conduct such as recklessness.No. 05-40653 -2- As the United States Sentencing Commission has identified aggravated assault as a “crime of violence” for purposes of § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A), the district court did not commit error, plain or otherwise, by imposing the sentence enhancement. § 2L1.2, comment. (n.1(b)(iii)); see United States v. Izaguirre-Flores , 405 F.3d 270, 275 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 126 S. Ct. 253 (2005); see also United States v. Rayo-Valdez , 302 F.3d 314, 317 (5th Cir. 2002). Rubio-Cruz argues next that the “felony” and “aggravated felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and (b)(2) are unconstitutional on their face and as applied in his case in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000). RubioCruz’s constitutional challenge is foreclosed by AlmendarezTorres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998). Although Rubio-Cruz contends that Almendarez-Torres was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule Almendarez-Torres in light of Apprendi , we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that Almendarez-Torres remains binding. See United States v. Garza-Lopez , 410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 126 S. Ct. 298 (2005). Rubio-Cruz properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of Almendarez-Torres and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review.
AFFIRMED.
**Annual
      Statement of Compliance**





VIA:
      EMAIL





Merrill
      Lynch Mortgage Investors, Inc.


250
      Vesey
      Street


4
      World
      Financial Center, 10th Floor


New
      York,
      New York 10080





Wilshire
      Credit Corporation


14523
      SW
      Millikan Way


Suite
      200


Beaverton,
      Oregon 97005





Attention:
      Merrill Lynch Mortgage Investors Trust, Series 2006-AHL1





Re:
      Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the "Agreement") dated as of June 1, 2006
      among
      Merrill Lynch Mortgage Investors, Inc., as depositor, Wilshire Credit
      Corporation, as servicer and LaSalle Bank National Association, as trustee,
      relating to Merrill Lynch Mortgage Investors Trust, Mortgage Loan Asset-Backed
      Certificates, Series 2006-AHL1





I,
      Barbara L. Marik, a First Vice President of LaSalle Bank National Association,
      as Trustee hereby certify that:





(1)
      A
      review of the activities of the Trustee during the preceding calendar year
      and
      of the performance of the Trustee under the Agreement has been made under my
      supervision; and





(2)
      To
      the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Trustee has fulfilled all
      its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout such
      year or a portion thereof.











Date: February
      1, 2007





LaSalle
      Bank National Association, as Trustee








/s/
      Barbara L Marik


Barbara
      L. Marik


First
      Vice President
§ 9.15 Use of roads by commercial vehicles. ( a ) After January 26, 1977, no commercial vehicle shall use roads administered by the National Park Service without first being registered with the Superintendent. ( 1 ) A fee shall be charged for such registration based upon a posted fee schedule, computed on a ton-mile basis. The fee schedule posted shall be subject to change upon 60 days notice.
( 2 ) An adjustment of the fee may be made at the discretion of the Superintendent where a cooperative maintenance agreement is entered into with the operator.
( b ) No commercial vehicle which exceeds roadway load limits specified by the Superintendent shall be used on roads administered by the National Park Service unless authorized by written permit from the Superintendent.
( c ) Should a commercial vehicle used in operations cause damage to roads or other facilities of the National Park Service, the operator shall be liable for all damages so caused.
Date of 

report 

1967 

Sept. 21 

21 

~tuatt nf tqr luitr~ jtatrs 

NINETIETH CONGRESS 

FIRST SESSION-Began January 10, 1967 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Prepared under the direction of FRANCIS R. VALEO, Secretary of the Senate 

By GERALD A. HACKETT, Executive Clerk 

Friday, September 22, 1967 

NOMINATIONS 

Calendar Message Name or nominee Office Predecessor 

No. No. 

DEPARTMENT OF 

DEFENSE 

1164 346 Thomas H. Nielsen, of An Assistant Secretary of Leonard Marks, Jr. 

California. the Air Force. 

U.S. ARMY 

The following-named 

officer for temporary appomtment in the Army of 

the United States, to the 

grade indicated, under the 

provisions of title 10, 

United States Code, sees. 

3442 and 3447: 

1165 342 Chaplain (Col.) Ned Ral- Brigudier generaL _________ 

ston Graves, 043164, 

U.S. Army. 

NOMINATIONS PLACED ON THE SECRETARY'S DESK 

In the Air Force 

The nominatwns beginning Richard N. Aloy, to be major, and endmg Edward W Zwack, to be captain, 

which nommatwns were received by the Senate and appeared in the CongressiOnal Record on Aug. 14, 1967 

(12AF), and 

The nominations beginning Paul J. Abeln, to be cap tam, and endmg Mary A. Zavatson, to be captain, whJCh 

nommations were received by the Senate and appeared in the Congressional Record on Aug 30, 1967 (13AF). 

In the Army 

The nominations begmning Robert E. Hull, to be colonel, and ending Charles L Z1tmck, Jr, to be second 

heutenunt, whJCh nominations were received by the Senate and appe!lred m the Congressional Record on Aug. 

24, 1967 (lOA), and 

The nominations beginning Marcelino C. Gmang, to be lieutenant colonel, and ending Jane F. Sager, to 

be captain, which nominations were received by the Senate and appeared m the Congressional Record on Sept. 

11, 1967 (llA). 

85-022-67-No 94 
2 

In the Navy and Marine Corps 

'rhe nominations beginning Hal C. Castle, Jr., to be ensign in the Navy, and ending William J. Sandusky 

to bP a perm:tnent lieutenant (j.g.) and a temporary lieutenant in the Navy, which nominations were receivPd 

by tht> HPn:tte and appeared in the Congressional Record on Sept. 11, 1967 (5N). 

In the Marine Corps 

The nominations beginning Paul R. Aadnesen, to be captain, and ending Roger D. Zorens, to be captain, 

which nominations were received by the Senate and appeared in the Congressional Record on Sept. 12, 1967 

(10M). 

U.S GOVERNMENT PJUHTING' OFFICE~ lU7
---

CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

I, Ian R. McNeil, President and Chief Executive Officer of
Searchlight Minerals Corp. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company, for
      the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2006, and to which this certification is
      attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                         

| | By:    | /s/ Ian R. McNeil                    
| | ------ | -------------------------------------
| |        |                                      
| | Name:  | IAN R. MCNEIL                        
| |        |                                      
| | Title: | President and Chief Executive Officer
| |        |                                      
| | Date:  | August 10, 2006                      

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-QSB to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-QSB), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
1 Brunner, Christine

From: Sutton, Tia Sent: Friday, February 14, 2014 10:52 AM To: Brunner, Christine Subject: FW: RIA Chapters 6,7,8 Attachments: Ch 8 - Cost Benefit Analysis.doc; Ch 6 - Health and Env Effects.doc; Ch 7 - Appendix A.doc; Ch 7 - Rule Emiss and AQ Impacts.doc

From: Sutton, Tia Sent: Friday, February 14, 2014 10:31 AM To: 'Whiteman, Chad' Cc: Sargeant, Kathryn; Machiele, Paul; Yanca, Catherin e Subject: RE: RIA Chapters 6,7,8



### Hi Chad, Chapters 6, 7 (+Appendix), and 8 are attached. If you have any problems with the files, just let me k now.

Best, Tia

From: Whiteman, Chad [ mailto:Chad_S_Whiteman@omb.eop.gov ] Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2014 10:06 PM To: Sutton, Tia Cc: Sargeant, Kathryn; Machiele, Paul; Yanca, Catherin e Subject: RIA Chapters 6,7,8



### Tia, Would it be possible to get Word versions of Ch apters 6, 7, and 8 of the RIA? It is unwieldy to work with the entire RIA pfd document. Thanks, Chad
SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NINETY-EIGHTH CONGRESS 

Convened January 3, 1983 

FIRST SESSION { 

SECOND SESSION { 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Tuesday, February 15, 1983 

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF WILLIAM F. HILDENBRAND, 

SECRETARY OF THE SENATE 

By Gerald A. Hackett, Executive Clerk 
Calendar 

No. 

1 

2 

Calendar 

No. 

* 2 

* 3 

Treaty 

Doc. No. 

Ex. B. 

95-1 

97-19 

Message 

No. 

4 

41 

1 

TREATIES 

Subject 

Montreal Aviation Protocols Nos. 3 and 4 

Constitution of the United Nations 

Industrial Development Organization. 

NOMINATIONS 

Nominee, Office, And Predecessor 

DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

Richard T. McCormack, of the District of 

Columbia, to be an Assistant Secretary of 

State, vice Robert D. Hormats, resigned. 

Richard R. Burt, of the District of 

Columbia, to be an Assistant Secretary of 

State, vice Lawrence S. Eagleburger, 

resigned. 

Reported 

Bv 

Feb 10 83 Reported 

favorably, by Mr. Percy. 

Committee on Foreign 

Relations, with conditions 

to the resolution of 

ratification (Printed 

report-Ex. Rept. 98-1) 

Feb 10 83 Reported 

favorably, by Mr. Percy, 

Committee on Foreign 

Relations, with 

understandings to the 

resolution of ratification 

(Printed report--Ex. Rept. 

98-2) 

Reported 

Bv 

Feb 3, 83 Mr. Percy, 

Committee on Foreign 

Relations, without printed 

report. 

Do. 
2 

Calendar Message Nominee, Office, And Predecessor Reported 

No. No. Bv 

AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK 

* 4 7 W. Allen Wallis, of New York, to be Feb 3, 83 Mr. Percy, 

Alternate Governor of the African Committee on Foreign' 

Development Bank for the term of five Relations, without printed 

years. (New Position) report 

u. s. INTERNATIONAL 

DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION AGENCY 

* 5 9 Thomas A. Bolan, of New York, to be a Do. 

Member of the Board of Directors of the 

Overseas Private Investment Corporation 

for a term expiring December 17, 1985. 

(Reannointment) . *S1gnlf1es nomtnee's commitment to respond to requests to appear and testify before any duly 

constituted commmee of the Senate. 
3 

NOMINATIONS PLACED ON THE SECRETARY'S DESK IN THE FOREIGN SERVICE 

Foreign Service nominations beginning Rolland E. Anderson, Jr., and ending Bryant H. 

Wadsworth, which nominations were received by the Senate and appeared in the Congressional Record 

of January 25, 1983. 

Foreign Service nominations beginning Robert T. Curran, and ending Wesley D. Stewart, which 

nominations were received by the Senate and appeared in the Congressional Record of January 25, 

1983.
UNITED STATES

Appellee

v.

Adam C. MATTHEWS

Chief Petty Officer (E-7)

U.S. Navy

Appellant

NMCCA NO. 202100256

Panel 2

ORDER

Granting Appellant’s Motion

to Withdraw Case from

Appellate Review

Upon consideration of Appellant’s Motion to Withdraw Case from Appellate 

Review, filed on 12 January 2022, we have determined that Appellant’s request 

was properly executed and submitted, and is in substantial compliance with 

Article 61, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 861, and Rule for 

Courts-Martial 1115.

Accordingly, it is, by the Court, this 12th day of January 2022,

ORDERED:

(1) That Appellant’s Motion to Withdraw Appellate Review is GRANTED.

(2) That the record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General for 

appropriate disposition. 

FOR THE COURT:

RODGER A. DREW, JR.

Clerk of Court

Copy to:

45 (LT Horst)

46

02
Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATION**I, Thomas R. Johnson, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Call Now, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiary, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscalquarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’sauditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s Board of Directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theRegistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.   March 26, 2007     /s/ Thomas R. Johnson   Thomas R. Johnson  Chief Executive Office and  Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 31.2**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Kung-Chieh Huang, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of EUPA International Corporation (the“Registrant”).
     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report;
     4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and we have:
          a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
          b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
          c) disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
     5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
          a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
          b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: May 16, 2005              /s/ Kung-Chieh Huang   Kung-Chieh Huang   Chief Financial Officer  
17