alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1177.30 Termination of collection activity. ( a ) NEH may terminate collection activity when: ( 1 ) NEH is unable to collect any substantial amount through its own efforts or through the efforts of others;
( 2 ) NEH is unable to locate the debtor;
( 3 ) NEH anticipates that the costs of collection will exceed the amount recoverable;
( 4 ) The debt is legally without merit or enforcement of the debt is barred by any applicable statute of limitations;
( 5 ) NEH cannot substantiate the debt; or
( 6 ) The debt against the debtor has been discharged in bankruptcy.
( b ) Before terminating collection activity, NEH will have pursued all appropriate means of collection and determined, based upon the results of the collection activity, that the debt is uncollectible. Terminating collection activity ceases active collection of the debt but does not preclude NEH from retaining a record of the account for purposes of: ( 1 ) Selling the debt, if the Secretary determines that such sale is in the best interests of the United States;
( 2 ) Pursuing collection at a subsequent date in the event there is a change in the debtor's status or a new collection tool becomes available;
( 3 ) Offsetting against future income or assets not available at the time the agency terminated collection activity; or
( 4 ) Screening future applicants for prior indebtedness.
( c ) Generally, NEH will terminate collection activity on a debt that has been discharged in bankruptcy, regardless of the amount. NEH may continue collection activity, however, subject to the provisions of the Bankruptcy Code, for any payments provided under a plan of reorganization. Offset and recoupment rights may survive the discharge of the debtor in bankruptcy and, under some circumstances, claims also may survive the discharge. For example, if NEH is a known creditor of the debtor, its claims may survive a discharge if it did not receive formal notice of the proceedings. NEH will seek legal advice from its Office of the General Counsel if it believes it has claims or offsets that may survive the discharge of a debtor.
§ 1151.12 Qualified handicapped person. *Qualified handicapped person means:* ( a ) With respect to employment, a handicapped person who, with reasonable accommodation, can perform the essential functions of the job in question; and
( b ) With respect to services, a handicapped person who meets the essential eligibility requirements for the receipt of such services.
§ 810.4 Appeals. ( a ) When a request has been denied, the requester may, within 30 days of receipt of the denial, appeal the denial to the Executive Director of the Council. Appeals to the Executive Director shall be in writing, shall be addressed to the Executive Director, Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, 1522 K Street NW., Washington, DC 20005, and shall be clearly marked “FREEDOM OF INFORMATION APPEAL.” Requests that are not so marked will be honored, but will be deemed not to have been received by the Council, for purposes of computing the response time, until the date on which they are identified by a member of the Council staff as being an appeal pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act.
( b ) The appeal will be acted on within 20 working days of receipt. A written decision shall be issued. Where the decision upholds an initial denial of information, the decision shall include a reference to the specific exemption in the Freedom of Information Act which authorizes withholding the information, a brief explanation of how the exemption applies to the record withheld, and a brief statement of why a discretionary release is not appropriate. The decision shall also inform the requester of the right to seek judicial review in the U.S. District Court where the requester resides or has his principal place of business, or in which the agency records are situated, or in the District of Columbia.
( c ) If no decision has been issued within 20 working days, the requester is deemed to have exhausted his administrative remedies.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-2142

KAYI GOUDEAGBE, Petitioner,

v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted: May 19, 2009 Decided: June 17, 2009

Before TRAXLER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Edwin K. Fogam, Silver Spring, Maryland, for Petitioner. Michael F. Hertz, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Lyle D. Jentzer, Senior Litigation Counsel, Edward J. Duffy, Trial Attorney, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.PER CURIAM: Kayi Goudeagbe, a native and citizen of Togo, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) dismissing her appeal from the immigration judge’s denial of her requests for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture. Before this court, Goudeagbe challenges the determination that she failed to establish her eligibility for asylum. To obtain reversal of a determination denying eligibility for relief, an alien “must show that the evidence [s]he presented was so compelling that no reasonable factfinder could fail to find the requisite fear of persecution.” INS v.

Elias-Zacarias , 502 U.S. 478, 483-84 (1992). We have reviewed the evidence of record and conclude that Goudeagbe fails to show that the evidence compels a contrary result. Accordingly, we cannot grant the relief that she seeks. Additionally, we uphold the denial of Goudeagbe’s request for withholding of removal. “Because the burden of proof for withholding of removal is higher than for asylum--even though the facts that must be proved are the same--an applicant who is ineligible for asylum is necessarily ineligible for withholding of removal under [8 U.S.C.] § 1231(b)(3).” Camara

v. Ashcroft , 378 F.3d 361, 367 (4th Cir. 2004). Because

23 Goudeagbe failed to show that she is eligible for asylum, she cannot meet the higher standard for withholding of removal.

We also find that substantial evidence supports the finding that Goudeagbe failed to meet the standard for relief under the Convention Against Torture. To obtain such relief, an applicant must establish that “it is more likely than not that he or she would be tortured if removed to the proposed country

of removal.” 8 C.F.R. § 1208 .16(c)(2) (2009). We find that Goudeagbe failed to make the requisite showing before the immigration court. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

) 

) 

Mike Braun for Indiana and Thomas Datwyler ) MUR 8107 

 in his official capacity as treasurer ) 

) 

CONSENT TO EXTEND THE TIME TO COMMENCE A

CIVIL LAW ENFORCEMENT ACTION, SUIT OR PROCEEDING

In order to provide for a possible resolution of this matter through pre-probable cause 

conciliation, Respondent, Mike Braun for Indiana and Thomas Datwyler in his official capacity 

as treasurer, hereby consents to toll the statute of limitations for any civil enforcement action, 

suit, or proceeding that the Federal Election Commission might institute in connection with 

MUR 8107 pursuant to 52 U.S.C. §30109(a) for an additional period of sixty (60) days. 

This agreement will extend the time to institute a civil law enforcement suit for an 

additional period of sixty (60) calendar days from the expiration date of the five-year statute of 

limitations found at 28 U.S.C. § 2462, or any other statute of limitations or repose that may be 

applicable in these matters.

There shall be no additional consent to extend the time to instate a civil law enforcement 

suit without the written consent of the Respondent. 

Dated: ___________________ 

__________________________

Counsel for Respondent 

May 26, 2023

Eric Wang

MUR810700090
Exhibit 99.1(b)








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of
Fox Entertainment Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David F. DeVoe, Senior
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.








/S/    DAVID F.
DEVOE








David F. DeVoe


Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


November 6, 2002
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 20 (Tuesday, January 31, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 5050]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-876]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Notice of New Recreation Fee Site; Federal Lands Recreation 
Enhancement Act, (Title VIII, Pub. L. 108-447)

AGENCY: National Forests in North Carolina, USDA Forest Service.

ACTION: Notice of New Recreation Fee Site.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Forests in North Carolina will begin charging a 
$5.00 daily special recreation permit trail fee per Off Highway Vehicle 
(OHV) and $30.00 per OHV for a season pass for use of the Black Swamp 
OHV trail system. Construction of the site was completed in 2005. This 
new trail system replaces a system that existed until 2005. The trail 
system was moved to protect environmental sites and will facilitate 
continued OHV use within the National Forests in North Carolina on the 
Croatan Ranger District. Fee revenue will support operations and 
maintenance of the trail system and trailhead and future site 
improvements.

DATES: Black Swamp OHV Area is scheduled to open for public use in 
2006.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David H. Wright, Recreation Fee 
Coordinator, 828-257-4256, National Forests in North Carolina, PO Box 
2750, Asheville, NC 28802.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Recreation Lands Enhancement Act 
(Title VIII, Pub. L. 108-447) directed the Secretary of Agriculture to 
publish advance notice in the Federal Register whenever new recreation 
fee areas are established. The National Forests in North Carolina 
presently manages four OHV fee sites in North Carolina. Recreation fees 
are $5.00 per OHV per day and $30.00 per OHV per season pass. Black 
Swamp OHV Area will offer vault toilet facilities, improved parking 
area, information kiosk, and access to twelve miles of OHV trails.

    Dated: January 25, 2006.
Marisue Hilliard,
National Forests in North Carolina Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 06-876 Filed 1-30-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-52-M
AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT DATED 07-24-2000



EXHIBIT 10.14

AMENDMENT


               THIS AMENDMENT (the "Amendment") amends the Employment Agreement dated as of January 3, 2000 (the "Employment
Agreement"), by and between McLAREN PERFORMANCE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Delaware corporation formerly known as McLaren Automotive Group, Inc., with its principal office located at 32233 West Eight Mile Road, Livonia, Michigan 48152 (the "
Corporation") and JACQUELINE K. KURTZ, an individual whose address is 1280 Sunset Road, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48103 (the "Employee").

RECITALS:


               A.      The Compensation Committee of the Corporation has determined it is in the best interest
of the Corporation to increase the annual salary paid to Employee.


               B.      The Corporation and the Employee desire to amend the terms of the Employment Agreement as
set forth in this Amendment to effectuate the salary increase.


               NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree to the following terms:


               1.      Amendment. The first sentence of Section 4 of the Employment Agreement, entitled "
Salary and Bonus," is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows: "During her employment with the Corporation, the Corporation will pay Employee an annual salary of One Hundred Thirty Thousand Dollars ($130,000), payable according to the
Corporation's standard payment practices."

               2.     Effective Date. This Amendment shall be effective as of July 24, 2000.

               3.     Other Terms. All of the remaining terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement shall
remain in full force and effect and this Amendment shall be deemed to be a part of the Employment Agreement, and the Employment Agreement shall be a part of this Amendment as if fully set forth herein.

               4.     Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which
will be deemed to be an original, but all of which will constitute one and the same document.

[Signatures on following page]







               IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Amendment as of the date first written above.


	 	McLAREN PERFORMANCE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
	 	 
	 	/s/ Wiley R. McCoy
	 	By:	Wiley R. McCoy, President
	 	 	 
	 	/s/ Jacqueline K. Kurtz
	 	JACQUELINE K. KURTZ


Compensation Committee:

 

/s/ Lawrence Cohen


Lawrence Cohen

/s/ Robert J. Sinclair


Robert J. Sinclair
Date of 

report 

1967 

Aug. 17 

~ruatr nf tqr lluitr~ ~tatts NINETIETH CONGRESS 

FIRST SESSION-Began January 10, 1967 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Pre pared under the dtrection of FRANCIS R. V ALEO, Secretary of the Senate 

By GERALD A. HACKETT, Executive Clerk 

Monday, August 21, 1967 

NOMINATION 

Calendar Message No No Name of nominee Office Predecessor 

DEPARTMENT OF 

DEFENSE 

966 316 Townsend Hoopes, of Under Secretary of the A1r Nor man S. Paul, 

Vrrg1ma Force. resigned. 

----

85 022- 67-No 79 US GOVERNMENT PRI NTING OFFICE 1967
§ 1159.18 What are the penalties for obtaining an Endowment record under false pretenses? ( a ) Under 5 U.S.C. 552a(i)(3), any person who knowingly and willfully requests or obtains any record concerning an individual from the Endowment under false pretenses shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and fined not more than $5,000.
( b ) A person who falsely or fraudulently attempts to obtain records under the Privacy Act may also be subject to prosecution under other statutes, including 18 U.S.C. 494, 495, and 1001.
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 215 (Tuesday, November 7, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 65169]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9124]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration


Sunshine Act Meetings; Unified Carrier Registration Plan Board of 
Directors

AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, DOT.

Time and Date: November 7, 2006, 1 p.m. to 5 p.m. and November 8, 2006 
8 a.m. to 12 p.m.

Place: Hilton Chicago O'Hare Airport, O'Hare International Airport, 
Chicago, IL 60666.

Status: Open to the public.

Matters to be Considered: An overview of the Unified Carrier 
Registration Plan and Agreement requirements set forth under section 
4305 of the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation 
Equity Act: A Legacy for Users, and the administrative functioning of 
the Board. In addition, the Board will continue its work in developing 
the Unified Carrier Registration Agreement procedures and toward 
recommending UCRA fees to the Secretary.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. William Quade, (202)366-2172, 
Director, Office of Safety Programs, Federal Motor Carrier Safety 
Administration, or Mr. Bryan Price, (412) 395-4816, FMCSA Pennsylvania 
Division Office.

    Dated: November 2, 2006.
Rose A. McMurray,
Associate Administrator, Policy and Program Development.
[FR Doc. 06-9124 Filed 11-3-06; 2:23 pm]
BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P
- Contact Us
      - Site Map
      - FAQs
      - Phone Book

Search Current Unit

      - Home
      - Careers
      - Units
      - Missions
      - Doing Business
      - About Us

      - Office of Search & Rescue (CG-SAR)
      - How to Contact the U.S. Coast Guard
      - USCG Rescue Coordination Centers (RCCs)
      - Staff Phone Directory
      - SAR Program Information
      - SAR News
      - On Scene Magazines & Newsletters
      - Manuals & Documents
      - National Search and Rescue  Committee          (NSARC)
      - AMVER Home Page
      - SARSAT
      - Mass Rescue Operations
      - SAR Statistics, Facts, Info Sheets, Reports
      - SAR Links
      - Contact Webmaster

## Security Levels

# ***ON      SCENE***

The      Journal of U. S. Coast Guard Search and Rescue

**Latest Edition:  	On Scene News Letter Vol 1 Issue 3**

    	

**Back Issues:**
| ******Spring Vol 1 Issue 2** |  |  |
|------------------------------|--|--|
| **Spring 2011** | **Fall 2011** | **Winter Vol 1 Issue 	1** |
|-----------------|---------------|---------------------------|
| **Summer 2008** | ******Summer 2007** | **Summer 2009** |
|-----------------|---------------------|-----------------|
| ******Fall2006** | ******Fall 2005** | **Winter2004**in conjunction w/ ***Proceedings*** |
|------------------|-------------------|--------------------------------------------------------|
| ** ****Summer 2004** | ******Fall 2003** | ******Spring 2003** |
|---------------------------|-------------------|---------------------|
|   |
|--------|

| CG Magazine | OtherService Magazines |    

Download Plug-Ins
**Download Plug-Ins:**             Adobe Acrobat Reader (PDF)

      - Home
      - Contact Us
      - Privacy Policy
      - Accessibility
      - FOIA
      - USA.gov
      - No FEAR
      - Homeport
      - Whistleblower Protection
      - U.S. Department of Homeland Security
This table was generated on 9/12/23.

Rank ID # Committee Amount

1 C00797670 AMERICAN ISRAEL PUBLIC AFFAIRS COMMITTEE POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $7,260,700

2 C00580100 MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN PAC $6,005,645

3 C00573261 END CITIZENS UNITED $5,252,009

4 C00030718 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $3,275,776

5 C00836320 CAMPAIGN FOR DEMOCRACY PAC $2,511,539

6 C00552851 HOUSE FREEDOM FUND $2,479,555

7 C00458877 COUNTRY OVER PARTY PAC $2,337,987

8 C00765982 STAND FOR AMERICA PAC $2,144,845

9 C00365536 CHC BOLD PAC $1,942,393

10 C00659599 PROGRESSIVE TAKEOVER $1,857,859

11 C00448373 HUCK PAC $1,785,957

12 C00147512 CONGRESSIONAL BLACK CAUCUS PAC $1,706,979

13 C00632398 LET AMERICA VOTE PAC $1,666,027

14 C00550970 EQUALITY PAC $1,518,152

15 C00685297 ELECT DEMOCRATIC WOMEN $1,369,156

16 C00570226 SEAL PAC SUPPORTING ELECTING AMERICAN LEADERS PAC $1,311,054

17 C00443705 DEMOCRACY MATTERS $1,144,279

18 C00636944 SISTER DISTRICT PROJECT $1,099,755

19 C00211318 DELOITTE POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $1,088,398

20 C00458000 PROGRESSIVE CHANGE CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE $1,010,658

21 C00409730 NEW DEMOCRAT COALITION ACTION FUND $991,776

22 C00068353 SENATE FUTURE FUND $973,464

23 C00460402 KANSAS CAV PAC $843,762

24 C00227744 ERNST & YOUNG POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $723,570

25 C00448696 SENATE CONSERVATIVES FUND $650,466

26 C00651042 MOMS FED UP $605,867

27 C00513176 CONGRESSIONAL PROGRESSIVE CAUCUS PAC $601,542

28 C00767640 RANGER PAC $572,240

29 C00305318 BLUE DOG POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $555,924

30 C00091561 NATIONAL ACTIVE AND RETIRED FEDERAL EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION POLITICAL ACTION C $523,137

31 C00692327 LETS GET TO WORK PAC $508,958

32 C00562983 DEMOCRATIC ACTION $462,008

33 C00433060 REPUBLICAN GOVERNANCE GROUP/TUESDAY GROUP PAC $443,518

34 C00454074 TEAPARTYEXPRESS.ORG $436,902

35 C00630707 NATIONAL DEMOCRATIC REDISTRICTING PAC $408,013

36 C00003764 NATIONAL RESTAURANT ASSOCIATION PAC (RESTAURANT PAC) $391,820

37 C00784959 THE LONG RUN PAC $381,338

38 C00000422 AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $373,158

39 C00247403 NORPAC $369,990

40 C00165159 REPUBLICAN MAINSTREET PARTNERSHIP PAC $352,507

41 C00763227 ULTRA MAGA PAC $347,751

42 C00506907 ASPIRE PAC $318,911

43 C00782599 ELECT DIVERSE DEMOCRATS PAC $306,884

44 C00343459 AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY ASSOCIATION PAC $303,689

45 C00436022 MODERATE DEMOCRATS PAC $281,350

46 C00688580 TERM LIMITS ACTION $277,669

47 C00771865 AMERICAN VETERANS SUPPORT GROUP PAC $263,437

48 C00084061 BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF MICHIGAN PAC $256,932

49 C00171330 HOLLAND & KNIGHT COMMITTEE FOR EFFECTIVE GOVERNMENT $256,256

50 C00139659 JOINT ACTION COMMITTEE FOR POLITICAL AFFAIRS $251,377

Top 50 Other Nonconnected* PACs by Disbursements

January 1 - June 30, 2023

PAC Table 7b
This table was generated on 9/12/23.

*This table excludes Independent Expenditure-Only Political Committees, Committees with Non-Contribution Accounts and Leadership 

PACs.
#### § 223.161 [Reserved]
§ 1169.8 The appeals process. ( a ) An individual whose request for access to, or correction or amendment of, a record is initially denied by NEH and who wishes to appeal that denial may do so by sending a letter within 90 days of receipt of the initial denial to the Chairperson. If an appeal concerns records retrieved from the OIG's Investigative Files, the OIG will act on the appeal and will carry out all responsibilities with respect to Privacy Act appeals otherwise assigned to the Chairperson under this section.
( b ) The appeal letter must: ( 1 ) Specify the records subject to the appeal;
( 2 ) Include the information specified in § 1169.7(b);
( 3 ) Include copies of the correspondence from NEH in which it initially denied the request for access, or for amendment or correction; and
( 4 ) Explain why NEH's denial of access, amendment or correction was erroneous.
( c ) Appeals should be directed to the NEH Office of the General Counsel at the physical address or email address identified in § 1169.3. The Office of the General Counsel will refer the appeal letter to the Chairperson (or his or his or her designee), or in the case of records retrieved from NEH's OIG Investigative Files, will refer the appeal letter to the NEH OIG.
( d ) The Chairperson will review the initial request for access to, or amendment or correction of, the record, NEH's refusal, and any other pertinent material relating to the appeal. NEH will not hold a hearing on the appeal.
( e ) The Chairperson will render a final decision on the appeal within 30 business days of its receipt by NEH, unless the Chairperson, for good cause shown, extends the 30-day period. Should the Chairperson extend the 30-day period, NEH will inform the requester of the extension and the circumstances of the delay.
( f ) In conducting appeals under this provision, the Chairperson will be guided by the requirements of 5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(1) and (e)(5).
( g ) NEH will notify a requester, in writing, when the Chairperson determines to grant an appeal in whole or in part, and will grant the requester access to his or her record, or correct or amend the record, in accordance with the Chairperson's determination.
( h ) When the Chairperson determines to deny an appeal, in whole or in part, NEH will notify the requester in writing of the following: ( 1 ) The basis for the decision;
( 2 ) That the requester may submit to NEH a concise statement setting forth the reasons for disagreeing with NEH's decision.
( 3 ) The procedures for filing such statement of disagreement.
( 4 ) That, in a case where the Chairperson refuses a request to amend or correct a record, NEH will make such statements of disagreement available in subsequent disclosures of the record, together with a statement from NEH (if deemed appropriate) summarizing the agency's refusal.
( 5 ) The requester's right to seek judicial review under 5 U.S.C. 552a(g)(1)(a).
[84 FR 34789, July 19, 2019, as amended at 84 FR 59314, Nov. 4, 2019]