alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1080.8 Reporting requirements. Each recipient of funds under the Emergency Community Services Homeless Grant Program shall submit an annual report to the Secretary, within 6 months of the end of the period covered by the report, on the expenditure of funds and the implementation of the program for that fiscal year. ( a ) The report is to state the types of activities funded, any efforts undertaken by the grantee and its subgrantees to coordinate homeless activities funded under this program with other homeless assistance activities in the State and communities, the number of individuals served and any impediments, including statutory and regulatory restrictions to homeless individuals' use of the program and to their obtaining services or benefits under the program.
( b ) Such annual report shall provide information on the use of funds to defray State administrative costs, including the types of activities which specifically address services to the homeless and also those activities that are related to the administrative costs associated with the coordination and integration of services to the homeless.
( c ) States shall also provide information in the annual report which details programs, progress, and activities that are specifically related to expenditures for renovation, including the effects of such activities on historic properties, and the provision of, or referral to, services for domestic violence.
(Information collection requirements are approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0970-0088) [57 FR 27946, June 23, 1992]
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Yak Communications (USA), Inc. (the Company) Quarterly
Report on Form 10-QSB for the nine months ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Charles Zwebner, Chief Executive Officer and principal financial officer of the
Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1). | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2). | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |  |  |     |  |                        |  |                                                                      
|------------------ |  |  |  | --- |  | ---------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|                   |  |  | 
|Date: May 14, 2004 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    Charles Zwebner
|                   |  |  |  |     |  |                        | 
|                   |  |  |  |     |  |                        |  | Charles Zwebner Chief Executive Officer &
Principal Financial Officer
#### § 223.38 Standards for road design and construction.

Road construction authorized under timber sale contracts, permits and other documents authorizing the cutting or removal of timber or forest products shall be designed to standards appropriate for the intended uses, considering safety, cost of transportation, and impacts on land and resources. If the sale contract provides for road design standards in excess of those needed for the harvest and removal of timber from that sale, including measures to protect adjacent resource values, provision shall be made in the contract for compensating the purchaser for the additional costs, unless the purchaser elects Government construction under section 14(i) of the National Forest Management Act of 1976.
SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

ONE HUNDRED SECOND CONGRESS 

FIRST SESSION { 

Convened January 3, 1991 

Adjourned January 3, 1992 

Convened January 3, 1992 

SECOND SESSION { 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Thursday, May 7, 1992 

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF WALTER J. STEWART, 

SECRETARY OF THE SENATE 

By Gerald A. Hackett, Executive Clerk 
1 

TREATIES 

Calendar Treaty Subject Reported 

No. Doc. !To. 'Rv 

1 EX. B., Two· Related Protocols to the Convention for Feb 5 91 Reported favorably 

95-1 the Unification of Certain Rules Relating by Mr. Pell, Committee on 

to International Carriage by Air, as Foreign Relations, with a 

Amended (Montreal Aviation Protocols No. 3 resolution of advice and 

and 4). consent to. ratification 

with provisos. (Printed 

report-Ex. Rept. 102-1 

together with minority 

views). 
2 

NOMINATIONS 

Calendar Message Nominee, Office, And Predecessor Reported 

* 

No. No. Bv 

[NEW REPORTS] 

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION 

570 991 Thomas P. Kerester, of Virginia, to be May 6, 92 Mr. Bumpers, 

Chief Counsel for Advocacy, Small Business Committee on Small 

Administration, vice Frank S. Swain, Business, without printed 

resil!"ned. reoort. 

*S1gmfies nominee's commitment to respond to requests to appear and testify before any duly 

constituted committee of the Senate.
Date of 

report 

1967 

July 17 

~ruutr nf tqr luitt~ itatts 

NINETIETH CONGRESS 

fiRST SESSION-Began January 10, 1967 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Pre pared under the direction of FRANCIS R. V ALEO, Secretary of the Senate 

l3y GERALD A. HACKETT, Executive Clerk 

Tuesday, July 18, 1967 

NOMINATION 

Calendar Message Name of nominee Office PredewiSOr 

No. No. 

DEPARTMENT OF 

THE INTERIOR 

795 285 David Statler Black, of Under Secretary of the In- Charles F. Luce. 

Washington. terior. 

85-022--67--No. 66
#### § 1172.38 Remedial action by recipients.

Where NEH finds a recipient has discriminated on the basis of age, the recipient shall take any remedial action that NEH may require to overcome the effects of discrimination. If another recipient exercises control over the recipient that has discriminated, NEH may require both recipients to take remedial action.
# Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas

December 11, 2019

No. 04

- 19

- 00712

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF Z. M. A CHILD,

From the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018

- PA

- 01197 Honorable Ant onia Arteaga, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

In this accelerated appeal of the trial court’s order terminating Appellant’s parental rights, Appellant’s court

- appointed attorney filed an Anders brief. In the brief, counsel states that after a professional evaluation of the record, counsel finds no re versible error, concludes the appeal is without merit and frivolous, and counsel attached a motion to withdraw. See Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967); In re R.R. , No. 04

- 03

- 00096

- CV, 2003 WL 21157944, at *4 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio May 21, 2003 , no pet.) (applying Anders procedure in a parental rights termination appeal).

Counsel informed Appellant of her right to file a pro se brief and to request a free copy of the appellate record. Counsel provided Appellant with a form request for a free co py of the appellate record, and the form lacks only Appellant’s contact information, date, and signature.

The State filed a letter waiving its right to file an appellee’s brief unless Appellant files a

pro se brief.

If Appellant desires to file a pro se br ief, we ORDER Appellant to do so within
TWENTY DAYS of the date of this order

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.6(a).

If Appellant files a pro se brief, the State may file a responsive brief not later than TWENTY DAYS after Appellant’s pro se brief is filed in this court. See id. R. 38.6(b).

The motion to withdraw is HELD IN ABEYANCE pending further order of this court.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 11th day of December, 2019

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense, Office of Economic Adjustment.

# ACTION:

 Notice.

# SUMMARY:

On October 23, 2006 the Department of Defense published a notice on Base Closure and Realignment. This notice corrects an error in the telephone number for Fort Hayes Memorial USARC.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Director, Office of Economic Adjustment, Office the Secretary of Defense, 400 Army Navy Drive, Suite 200, Arlington, VA 22202-43704, 703-604-6020.

## Correction

                        In                         **Federal Register**                         at 71 FR 62096, telephone number for Ohio is corrected to read 614-645-8036.                    

Dated: October 27, 2006.

L.M. Bynum,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, DoD.

[FR Doc. 06-9018  Filed 11-1-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-M
#### § 910.52 Buildable area.

*Buildable area* means that portion of the established *development parcel* which can be devoted to buildings and structures. Generally, this area is bounded by any applicable *building restriction lines,* right-of-way lines and *development parcel* lines. It shall be the *buildable area* of a *development parcel* rather than “lot,” as it is established in the DC Zoning Regulations, that will be utilized to establish the maximum *gross floor area* of a *development* within specified portions of the Development Area.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         1084681
<NAME>                        Apple Suites, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                              JUL-1-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       2,314,096
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,230,820
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                     124,911,597
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,515,951
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             133,707,837
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    55,739,856
<OTHER-SE>                                      70,064
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               133,707,837
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            12,052,256
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,497,375
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           5,023,329
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,554,882
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,554,882
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,554,882
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .58
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .58



</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7689

GEORGE DAVIS BOLLIN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

EDGEFIELD COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, Edgefield, South Carolina,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Greenville. Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge.

(CA-95-301-6-19AK)

Submitted: April 15, 1996 Decided: April 25, 1996

Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

George Davis Bollin, Appellant Pro Se. Vinton DeVane Lide, Michael

Stephen Pauley, LIDE, MONTGOMERY, POTTS & MEDLOCK, P.C., Columbia,

South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the

record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate

judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Bollin v. Edgefield County Sheriff's Dep't, No. CA-95-301-6-19AK (D.S.C. Sept.

28, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**Exhibit 32.2**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of R&R Acquisition IX, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kirk M. Warshaw, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

| Dated: September 11, 2008                                           |   |   |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/ Kirk M. Warshaw                                                 |   |   |        |
|                                                                     |   |   |   |
| Kirk M. WarshawChief Financial Officer(Principal Executive Officer) |   |   |   |

A signed original of this certification has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 

----
#### Coler *et al.*v. Sterling County Treasurer.

The state hoard of equalization is not authorized to treat bank stock as composing a class distinct from other stocks, even where there are only bank stocks assessed in a county.

(Opinion filed July 6, 1898.)

Appeal from circuit court, Beadle county. Hon. A. W. Campbell, Judge.

Suit by W. N. Coler & Co. and others against Edward Sterling,' treasurer of Beadle county. From a judgment for plaintiffs, defendant appeals.

Affirmed.

*H. S. Mouser,*for appellant.

*John L. Pyle,*for respondents.

Per Curiam.

It appears that the state board of equalization, in 1896, raised the valuation of bank stock, in all the counties of the state except one, without raising the valuation of other stocks in such counties. In other words, the board treated bank stock as a class separate and distinct from other stocks, for the purposes of equalization. Respecting the points involved in this appeal, the law of 1891, as amended in 1895, was substantially the same as that of 1897, and this proceeding is ruled by the decision in Campbell v. Bank, 11 S. D. 133, 76 N. W. 10; The action of the state board, so far as it affects plaintiff’s assessment, was unauthorized, and cannot be sustained. The fact that there were no stocks other than bank stock assessed in Beadle county does not distinguish this from the case cited, and the judgment of the court is affirmed.
SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

ONE HUNDRED FIRST CONGRESS 

Convened January 3, 1989 

FIRST SESSION { 

SECOND SESSION { 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Tuesday, June 6, 1989 

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF WALTER J.STEWART, 

SECRETARY OF THE SENATE 

By Gerald A. Hackett, Executive Clerk 
1 

NOMINATIONS 

Calendar Message Nominee, Office, And Predecessor Reported 

* 

* 

* 

No. No. Rv 

AMBASSADOR 

112 199 Joseph Verner Reed, of Connecticut, for the May 10, 89 Mr. Pell, 

rank of Ambassador during his tenure of Committee on Foreign 

service as Chief of Protocol for the White Relations, without printed 

House. report. 

DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

137 268 Douglas P. Mulholland, of Maryland, to be May 17, 89 Mr. Pell, 

an Assistant Secretary of State, vice Committee on Foreign 

Morton I. Abramowitz, resigned. Relations, without printed 

report. 

140 289 Peter F. Secchia, of Michigan, to be Do. 

Ambassador Extraordinary and 

Plenipotentiary of the United States of 

America to Italv. 

*Signifies nominee's commitment to respond to requests to appear and testify before any duly 

constituted committee of the Senate.
§ 1182.16 Procedures to ensure that Institute employees involved with its systems of records are familiar with the requirements of the Privacy Act. ( a ) The Director shall ensure that all persons involved in the design, development, operation, or maintenance of any Institute system are informed of all requirements necessary to protect the privacy of subject individuals. The Director also shall ensure that all Institute employees having access to records receive adequate training in their protection, and that records have adequate and proper storage with sufficient security to assure the privacy of such records.
( b ) All employees shall be informed of the civil remedies provided under 5 U.S.C. 552a(g)(1) and other implications of the Privacy Act, and the fact that the Institute may be subject to civil remedies for failure to comply with the provisions of the Privacy Act and the regulations in this part.
Chemicals 

P

a

rtner for Healthy 

School Environments 

Schools 

in 

Community P

artners 

From elementary school maint

enance closets t

o high school chemistry labs, schools house a variety of 

chemicals. E

very year, throughout 

the countr

y, hundreds of thousands 

of dollars are spent on K-12 school accidents in

volving chemicals, which 

in some cases ha

v

e been unused for 

decades. When improperly used or stored, chemicals can put students, staff, and the community at risk from spills, explosions, or other accidental exposur

e. 

What

’s 

Stake? 

at 

Explosives 

Picric Acid 

C

orrosives 

A

cetic Acid 

Flammables 

Paint 

Thinner 

Toxics 

Lead and M

ercury 

in Schools 

Chemicals Found 

Recycled/Recyclable -- Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Process Chlorine Free Recycled Paper. 
 

 

s 

al 

Colleges and
Universities


■ Work with schools in assessing 

chemical cleanout, management and disposal issues 

■ Offer courses and training in 

environmental health and safety for teachers and school district employees 

Environment, Health, and Education Agencies 

■ Fund school chemical cleanout and 

prevention programs 

■ Provide technical assistance to 

schools in conducting chemical inventories and cleanouts 

In the News:


School


Partnerships in


Rhode Island


Rhode Island (RI) formed the Chemical Safe Schools Committee, which includes RI Departments of Health, Labor, Education and Environmental Management; Brown University; RI Committee on Occupational Safety and Health; Community College of Rhode Island; and Miriam Hospital. They are working together to help schools minimize the health, safety and environmental risks associated with chemicals in schools. Through the efforts of this committee more than 800 hazardous chemicals are no longer allowed in schools. The committee created a handbook on laboratory safety, reviewed chemical inventories, conducted training, and helped clean out a number of schools. 

 School Environment issues, visit: www.epa.gov/schools
§ 1233.16 How does an agency transfer records to the National Personnel Records Center (NPRC)? Agencies must use the following procedures when transferring records to the NPRC: ( a ) *Civilian personnel files.* ( 1 ) Forward the official personnel folder (OPF) and the employee medical folder (EMF) to the NPRC at the same time.
( 2 ) Transfer EMFs and OPFs in separate folders.
( 3 ) Retirement of individual folders is based on the date of separation and should occur within 90 to 120 days after the employee separates from Federal service.
( 4 ) For additional guidance, consult the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) 1900 E Street, NW., Washington, DC 20415, phone number (202) 606-1800, Web site *http://www.opm.gov/feddata/recguide2008.pdf ,* for the OPM publication “The Guide to Personnel Recordkeeping” for procedures on the transfer of OPFs and EMFs.
( b ) *Military medical records.* Military health care facilities should contact their facility records managers for guidance on transferring medical records to NPRC. For additional guidance, consult the “Transactions with the National Personnel Records Center (NPRC), St. Louis, MO” section of the NARA Federal Records Centers Program Web site (*http://www.archives.gov/frc/toolkit.html#transactions*).
( c ) *Other guidance assistance.* For further guidance assistance consult the NPRC Web site (*http://www.archives.gov/facilities/mo/st_louis.html*).
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.1


                               September 24, 2001

Mr. Anthony Nuzzo
22 Chatham Circle
Wellesley, MA 02481

Dear Tony:

         This letter will confirm that, pursuant to the action taken by the
Board of Directors of Engage, Inc. ("Engage"), on Thursday, September 20, 2001,
notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in the Executive Retention
Agreement dated as of November 7, 2000, by and between Engage and you (the
"Retention Agreement"), as a result of your resignation from your positions at
Chief Executive Officer and President and as a director of Engage, you will be
entitled to receive all of the rights and benefits afforded to you under Section
3A of the Retention Agreement commencing on your last day of employment on
September 30, 2001. In addition, you are entitled to receive all of the rights
and benefits set forth in that certain letter from Frank B. Campanella to you,
dated as of September 10, 2001.

                                Very truly yours,

                                Engage, Inc.

                                By: /s/ Michael K. Baker
                                    ------------------------------------------
                                    Michael K. Baker
                                    Executive Vice President & General Counsel