alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[House Document 109-129]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

                                     

109th Congress, 2d Session - - - - - - - - - - - - House Document 109-129

 
     CERTIFICATION FOR AN EXPORT TO THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA

                               __________

                             COMMUNICATION

                                  from

                   THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

                              TRANSMITTING

CERTIFICATION THAT THE EXPORT TO THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA OF THE 
 SPECIFIED ITEMS IS NOT DETRIMENTAL TO THE UNITED STATES SPACE LAUNCH 
 INDUSTRY, AND THAT THE MATERIAL AND EQUIPMENT, INCLUDING ANY INDIRECT 
  TECHNICAL BENEFIT THAT COULD BE DERIVED FROM SUCH EXPORTS, WILL NOT 
  MEASURABLY IMPROVE THE MISSILE OR SPACE LAUNCH CAPABILITIES OF THE 
  PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA, PURSUANT TO PUB. L. 105-261, SEC. 1512.

 August 2, 2006.--Referred to the Committee on International Relations 
                 and Commerce and ordered to be printed
                                           The White House,
                                         Washington, July 28, 2006.
Hon. J. Dennis Hastert,
Speaker of the House of Representatives,
Washington, D.C.
    Dear Mr. Speaker: In accordance with the provisions of 
section 1512 of the Strom Thurmond National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1999 (Public Law 105-261), I 
hereby certify that the export to the People's Republic of 
China of the following items is not detrimental to the United 
States space launch industry, and that the material and 
equipment, including any indirect technical benefit that could 
be derived from such exports, will not measurably improve the 
missile or space launch capabilities of the People's Republic 
of China.
    1. Two million pounds of bulk graphite for use by Smarteem 
Precision Manufacturing Company, Qingdao Dezong Trading 
Company, Qingdao Haier Moulds Company, Hi-P Shanghai Precision 
Mold and Die, Shanghai Sharp Mold and Manufacturing, Shanghai 
Koito Automotive Lamp Company, Ningbo Yongyao Graphite Product, 
Heibei Ningjin Matsimiya Semiconductor, Heibei Ningjin 
Yangguang Electrodes, Jiaxiang Zhengda Xingxin Electrodes, 
Shanghai Shenhe Thermo-Magnetics and Genic (Shanghai) Company 
to manufacture electrodes, dies and molds for the production 
and handling of plastic, rubber, copper, tin, aluminum, and 
iron components.
    2. One 36-inch micronizer to be used by Jiangsu Sopo 
Chemical of Zhenjiang, China, for processing azodicarbonomide 
for use in manufacturing plastics. 3. One 42-inch micronizer to 
be used by Cabot Performance Products Company, LTD. of Tianjin, 
China, for manufacturing carbon black to be used in rubber and 
plastics manufacturing.
            Sincerely,
                                                    George W. Bush.

                                    

```
#### Fred Myers, Appellant, *v.*Town of Gates, Respondent.

(Argued March 12, 1907;

decided April 2, 1907.)

*Myers*v. *Town of Gates,*111 App. Div. 909, affirmed.

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered January 18, 1906, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon á dismissal of the complaint by the court at a Trial Term and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been caused by defendant’s negligence.

• *Philetus Chamberlain*and *Albert L. Shepard*for appellant.

*George P. Peclcer*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., Gray, Yann, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscook and Chase, JJ.
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of SRKP 14, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
      10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard A.
      Rappaport, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      ss.
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
                Richard A. RappaportRichard
                A. Rappaport
              Principal
                Executive Officer
              July 30, 2008
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 214 (Monday, November 6, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 64954]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9098]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE BOARD


Sunshine Act Meeting Notice; Announcing an Open Meeting of the 
Board of Directors

Time and Date: The open meeting of the Board of Directors is scheduled 
to begin at 10 a.m. on Wednesday, November 8, 2006.

Place: Board Room, First Floor, Federal Housing Finance Board, 1625 Eye 
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20006.

Status: The meeting will be open to the public.

Matter to Be Considered at the Open Portion: Federal Home Loan Bank of 
Chicago Request to Redeem Excess Stock.

Contact Person for More Information: Shelia Willis, Paralegal 
Specialist, Office of General Counsel, at 202-408-2876 or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7f08161313160c0c3f1917191d51181009"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="65120c09090c161625030d03074b020a13">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: November 8, 2006.

    By the Federal Housing Finance Board.
John P. Kennedy,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 06-9098 Filed 11-2-06; 10:58 am]
BILLING CODE 6725-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Atlas-Energy for Nineties-Public #7
Ltd. (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Nancy J. McGurk, Chief Financial Officer of the Managing General
Partner, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

        (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13
            (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of
            operations of the Partnership.




/s/ Nancy J. McGurk






Nancy J. McGurk
Chief Financial Officer
August 14, 2002
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       4,261,993
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,182,206
<ALLOWANCES>                                    45,000
<INVENTORY>                                  6,142,777
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            16,276,956
<PP&E>                                      11,198,768
<DEPRECIATION>                                 875,333
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              47,186,359
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       14,515,735
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        13,634
<OTHER-SE>                                  12,190,561
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                47,186,359
<SALES>                                     21,604,680
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            21,680,117
<CGS>                                       18,782,667
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               18,782,667
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             6,210,945
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             573,388
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,283,242)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,324,842)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,324,842)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.22)


</TABLE>
#### Fredrieker Duffy, as Administratrix of the Estate of James Duffy, Deceased, Respondent, *v.*The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant.

*Duffy*v. _ZV. *7. O. & H. B. B. B. Go.,*126 App. Div. 950, affirmed.

(Argued January 28,1909;

decided February 9, 1909.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered June 23, 1908, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover for the death of plaintiff’s intestate alleged to have been caused by defendant’s negligence.

*Robert A. Kutschbock*and *Charles C. Paulding*for appellant.

*Julius Hilbern Cohn*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscook and Chase, JJ.
§ 9.33 If I am already operating under an NPS authorization, what do I need to do? ( a ) If you already have an NPS-approved plan of operations, you may continue to operate according to the terms and conditions of that approval, subject to the provisions of this subpart. For purposes of this subpart, we consider your approved plan of operations to be either a temporary access permit or operations permit.
( b ) This section applies to you if we have granted you an exemption to the plan of operations requirement because your operation accesses oil and gas rights inside a System unit boundary from a surface location outside the boundary. You may continue to operate under the exemption provided that your operations comply with the general terms and conditions of §§ 9.120 through 9.122. You are also subject to the prohibitions and penalties in §§ 9.180 through 9.182.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tasker Capital Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB/A for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Robert P. Appleby, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company as of and for the periods presented in the Report.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                   |  |                        
|------------------ |  | -----------------------
|September 30, 2005 |  | /s/ Robert P. Appleby  
|                   |  | Robert P. Appleby      
|                   |  | Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          20,975
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  402,370
<ALLOWANCES>                                    17,431
<INVENTORY>                                    295,770
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               756,609
<PP&E>                                       1,584,076
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,081,026
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,851,517
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          342,249
<BONDS>                                      1,273,340
<COMMON>                                         7,853
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     908,528
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,851,517
<SALES>                                      1,604,709
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,638,645
<CGS>                                        1,243,125
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,243,125
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                58,450
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              45,242
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (9,161)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (3,834)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (5,327)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (5,327)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.07)<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.07)

<FN>
<F1>  Reflects basic earnings per share.
</FN>


</TABLE>
Exhibit
31.1





MIT
Holding, Inc.


Certification
Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)


Section
302 Certification





I,
William C. Parker, the Chief Executive Officer of MIT Holding, Inc., certify
that:





1.    I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of MIT Holding, Inc.;





2.    Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.    Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, the results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4.    The
issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) for the


for the
issuer and have:





(a)   designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period
in which this report is being prepared;





(b)  evaluated
the effectiveness of the issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and





(c)  disclosed
in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the issuer's most recent fiscal quarter
(the issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer's
internal control over financial reporting; and





5.    The
issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small
business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business
issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):





(a)   all
significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the issuer's
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and





(b)   any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the issuer's internal control over financial
reporting.





Date:   May
19, 2010





/s/
      William C. ParkerWilliam
      C. ParkerChief
      Executive Officer
Adolfo R. s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 20, 2014

No. 04-14-00515-CV

SPECIALTY SELECT CARE CENTER OF SAN ANTONIO d/b/a Casa Rio Healthcare and 

Rehabilitation,

Appellant

v.

Adolfo R. JUIEL et al,

Appellee

From the 150th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014-CI-04911

Honorable Karen H. Pozza, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

This is an accelerated appeal from an interlocutory order denying appellant’s motion to 

compel arbitration. TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 51.016 (West Supp. 2013). Appellant 

has filed an unopposed motion to abate this appeal because one of the issues presented in the 

appeal is the same issue pending in petitions for review filed in Williamsburg Care Co. L.P. v. 

Acosta, 406 S.W.3d 711 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2013, pet. filed), Fredericksburg Care Co. 

L.P. v. Lira, 407 S.W.3d 810 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2013, pet. filed), and Fredericksburg 

Care Co. L.P. v. Perez, 406 S.W.3d 313 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2013, pet. filed). In light of 

the pending higher court review of the precedent previously established by this court, this court 

has determined that abating this appeal pending the Texas Supreme Court’s resolution of the

issue will likely achieve the greatest judicial efficiency. 

Accordingly, appellant’s motion to abate is GRANTED. For administrative purposes, 

this appeal will be treated as a closed case, unless and until appellant files a motion requesting its 

reinstatement following the Texas Supreme Court’s resolution of the issue.

Appellees’ motion for an extension of time in which to file a brief is MOOT.
_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 20th day of October, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

TONY ERIC DUPIN, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D16-4413 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed April 4, 2018. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Charlotte County; Donald H. Mason, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Ivy R. Ginsberg, Special Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Johnny T. Salgado, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.
KELLY, Judge.

Tony Eric Dupin appeals from his judgment and sentence for aggravated battery with a deadly weapon (a knife). He argues that his trial counsel's failure to object to the absence of a jury instruction on justifiable use of nondeadly force constituted ineffective assistance of counsel. While it is rare that a claim that defense- 2 -

counsel is ineffective will be considered on direct appeal, a defendant may raise it if the "ineffectiveness is apparent on the face of the record and it would be a waste of judicial resources to require the trial court to address the issue." Blanco v. Wainwright, 507 So. 2d 1377, 1384 (Fla. 1987). Counsel's performance in this case meets that standard. See McComb v. State, 174 So. 3d 1111, 1113 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015) (finding ineffective assistance of counsel on the face of the record where counsel's failure to request an instruction on justifiable use of nondeadly force deprived the defendant of a defense); see also Michel v. State, 989 So. 2d 679, 681 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (same). Accordingly, we reverse and remand for a new trial.

Reversed and remanded.
CASANUEVA and KHOUZAM, JJ., Concur.
#### §§ 1214.104-1214.109 [Reserved]
#### §§ 1208.131-1208.139 [Reserved]
SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

ONE HUNDRED SECOND CONGRESS 

FIRST SESSION { 

Convened January 3, 1991 

Adjourned January 3, 1992 

Convened January 3, 1992 

SECOND SESSION { 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Friday, May 15, 1992 

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF WALTER J. STEWART, 

SECRETARY OF THE SENATE 

By Gerald A. Hackett, Executive Clerk 
1 

TREATIES 

Calendar Treaty Subject Reported 

No. Doc. No. Bv 

1 EX. B., Two Related Protocols to the Convention for Feb 5 91 Reported favorably 

95-1 the Unification of Certain Rules Relating by Mr. Pell, Committee on 

to International Carriage by Air, as Foreign Relations, with a 

Amended (Montreal Aviation Protocols No. 3 resolution of advice and 

and 4). consent to ratification 

with provisos. (Printed 

report--Ex. Rept. 102-1 

together with minority 

views}. 
Calendar Message 

No. No. 

571 855 

* 579 1079 

* 580 1057 

* 581 1058 

582 1090 

2 

NOMINATIONS 

Nominee, Office, And Predecessor 

THE JUDICIARY 

Edward E. Carnes, of Alabama, to be United 

States Circuit Judge for the Eleventh 

Circuit vice Frank M. Johnson, Jr., 

retired. 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

Linda Gillespie Stuntz, of Virginia, to be 

Deputy Secretary of Energy, vice W. Henson 

Moore. 

[NEW REPORTS] 

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 

Jerome H. Powell, of New York, to be an 

Under Secretary of the Treasury, vice 

Robert R. Glauber, resigned. 

John Cunningham Dugan, of the District of 

Columbia, to be an Assistant Secretary of 

the Treasury, vice Jerome H. Powell. 

AIR FORCE 

The following named officer for appointment 

to the grade of lieutenant general while 

assigned to a position of importance and 

responsibility under title 10, United· 

States Code, section 601: 

to be Lieutenant General 

Reported 

Bv 

May 7, 92 Mr. Biden, 

Committee on the Judiciary, 

without printed report. 

May 13, 92 Mr. Johnston, 

Committee on Energy and 

Natural Resources, without 

printed report. 

May 14, 92 Mr._ Bentsen, 

Committee on Finance, 

without printed report. 

Do. 

May 14, 92 Mr. Nunn, 

Committee on Armed 

Services, without printed 

report. 
3 

Calendar Message Nominee, Office, And Predecessor Reported 

No. No. Bv 

AIR FORCE -- Con. 

582 1090 to be Lieutenant General May 14, 92 Mr. Nunn, 

Committee on Armed 

Services, without printed 

report. 

Maj. Gen. Buster C. Glosson, -

United States Air Force. . . *Sigmftes nomt nee's commitment to respond to requests to appear and testify before any duly 

constituted committee of the Senate.
# Map            Costa Rica.