alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 2- 39 77

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Yus su f Ham id
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l App el la nt

v.
JP Mor ga n Ch as e Ba

nk, N at ion al A sso ci at ion ; Shap ir o & Z ie lke , L L P; John D oe s I- XX
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l App el le es

__ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co ur t fo r th e Dis tri ct of M in ne so ta - Mi nn eap ol is

__ __ __ __ __ __ Su bm it te d: Apri l 3 0, 2 01 3 Fi le d: May 3, 20 13 [Un pu bl is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re BYE, ARNOLD, and SHEPHERD, Circ ui t J ud ge s.

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM.

In th is ci vi l act io n ch a l l e n g i ng th e fo recl os ur e of hi s ho m e, Yus su f Ham id ap pe al s aft er th e di st ric t co ur t di sm is se d hi s cl ai m s. Upo n car e f u l rev ie w of th e 1

The Hon or ab le Ri ch ard H. Ky le , Uni te d St at es Dis tri ct Ju dg e fo r th e Dis tri ct 1 of Mi nn es ot a.is su es pr op erl y rai se d on ap pe al , we fin d no ba si s fo r rev ers al

. See Bu tl er v. Ban k of

Am eri ca, N.A., 69 0 F.3 d 9 5 9 , 96 2 (8 th Ci r. 20 12 ) (rejec ti ng th eo ry th at ho ld er of

m or tg ag e m

us t al so ho ld no te in or de r to fo recl os e); s e e a l s o Ash cro ft v. Iq ba l, 55 6 U.S. 66 2, 67 8 ( 2 0 0 9 ) ( c o ur ts are no t bo un d to acce pt as tru e le ga l co nc lu si on s
co uc he d as fact ua l al le ga ti on s) ; Hil l v. Ci ty of Pi ne Bl uf f, Ark ., 69 6 F.3 d 70 9, 71 2 n.2 (8 th Ci r. 20 12 ) (cl ai m s no t arg u e d o n a pp eal are de em ed ab an do ne d) ; Ro ts ko ff v. Co ol ey , 43 8 F.3 d 85 2, 85 4 (8 th Ci r. 20 06 ) (ap pe ll an t waiv es ch al le ng e t o di st ric t
co ur t’s ru li ng by fai li ng to de ve lo p is su e i n br ie f as req ui red by ru le s of ap pe ll at e pr oc ed ur e); St on e v. Harry, 36 4 F.3 d 91 2, 91 4 (8 th Ci r. 20 04 ) (cl ai m s no t pr es en te d in di st ric t co ur t m ay

no t b e ad va nc ed forfir st ti m e o n a pp eal ).

Acco rd in gl y , we affi rm . See 8 th Cir . R. 47 B.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

-2

-
#### § 261.20 Pacific Crest National Scenic Trail.

It is prohibited to use a motorized vehicle on the Pacific Crest National Scenic Trail without a special-use authorization.

[49 FR 25450, June 21, 1984. Redesignated at 70 FR 68291, Nov. 9, 2005]
## WILLIAMS MULLEN

Direct Dial: 703.760.5204 kpomfret@wiIIiamsmulien.com August 26, 2015

BY FEDEX UAS Integration Office West Building Ground Floor, Room w12-140 1200 New JerseyAvenue, S.E. Washington, DC 20590 Re: Petition forAmendment to Docket FAA 2015-0001 and Docket FAA 2015-2205-0001 Dear Sir or Madam: By letterdated May 15, 2015 (the "EagleView Exemption Request"), EagleView Technologies, Inc. requested an exemption pursuant to Section 333 ofthe FAA Modernization and Reform Act of2012 to operate several classes of unmanned aircraft systems ("UAS"). By this letterwe request to amend the EagleView Exemption Request as follows: 1. To clarify that the "DJI Phantom" referred therein refers to the DJI Phantom 3; 2. To clarify that the "PrecisionHawk Lancaster" referred therein refers to the PrecisionHawk Lancaster HawkEye Mk-111; and 3. To clarify that the "DJI Inspire" referenced therein refers to the DJI Inspire 1. Copies ofthe operating documentsfor each are included in a separate attachment. We request that you treat these attachments as confidential. Otherthan these revisions, there will be no change in the conditions and reasons relative to public safety that were included in the EagleView Exemption Request. In addition, we reaffirm thatthe EagleView Exemption Request includes the microdrone md4-1000 and the Aerialtronics Altura Zenith ATX8. Thank you for your consideration ofthis request. Please contact me at 703.760.5204 if or kpomfret@williamsmullen.com ifyou have any questions.

KDP/kmb Confidential Attachments Under Separate Cover 28759291_1 8300 Greensboro Drive, Suite 1100 Tysons Corner, VA 221 02 T 703.760.5200 F703.748.0244 williamsmullen.com I A Professional Corporation
# Euroopa Liidu C 94A/28.

| | ISSN 1725-5171 |
| --- | --- |
| Euroopa Liidu
  Teataja | C 94A |
| | |
| Eestikeelne väljaanne | Teave ja teatised | 50. köide28. aprill 2007 |

ISSN 1725-5171

Euroopa Liidu

Teataja

C 94A

Eestikeelne väljaanne

Teave ja teatised

50. köide28. aprill 2007

---

| Teatis nr | Sisukord | Lehekülg |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | Parandused |
| 2007/C 094A/01 | Teadaanne avaliku konkursi kohta: uuringute juht – prognoosiekspert – Viide: EF/TA/07/02, parandus (ELT C 68 A, 24.3.2007) | 1 |

Teatis nr

Sisukord

Lehekülg

Parandused

2007/C 094A/01

Teadaanne avaliku konkursi kohta: uuringute juht – prognoosiekspert – Viide: EF/TA/07/02, parandus (ELT C 68 A, 24.3.2007)

1

| ET | |
| --- | --- |

ET

---

Parandused

| 28.4.2007 | ET | Euroopa Liidu Teataja | CA 94/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2007

ET

Euroopa Liidu Teataja

CA 94/1

---

Teadaanne avaliku konkursi kohta: uuringute juht – prognoosiekspert – Viide: EF/TA/07/02, parandus

(
  Euroopa Liidu Teataja C 68 A, 24. märts 2007
  )

(2007/C 94 A/01)

Leheküljel 4 osas V. AVALDUSED:

asendatakse

“20. aprillil 2007”

järgmisega:

“1. juunil 2007”.

---
## SERVE D JANUAR Y 13 , 201 0 U.S . DEPARTMEN T O F TRANSPORTATIO N DFP I O r OFFIC E O F HEARING S • WASHINGTON , D C I N TH E MATTE RO F SKYWES T AIRLINES , INC . FA A DOCKE T NO . CP09NM001 2 (Civi l Penalt y Action ) DM S No . FAA-2009-097 9 

### HEARIN G NOTIC E Th e Procedura l Orde r

b e an di s hereb y amende da s follows , reflectin g achang e i n discovery : O n o r after Marc h 1,2010 , th e partie s shal l conclud e al l discovery including , but no t limite dto , depositions , documen t production , response s t o productio n request s and/o r interrogatories . I f

th e partie s canno t

resolv e adiscovery disput e the y shal l submi t th e disput e t o th e undersigne dfo r resolutio n i n atimel y manner ; NOTIC E I S HEREB Y GIVE N tha t testimon y an devidenc e wil l b e hear dan dconsidere d o n Marc h 16,1 7 an d18,2010 , at th e U.S . Ta x Court , Courtroo m5223 , Wallac e F . Bennet t Federa l Building , 12 5 S . Stat e Street , Sal t Lak e City , U T 84138. ' Hearing s wil l commenc e at

9:0 0 a.m . an dconclud e a t 4:3 0 p.m . eac h day . Th e partie s shoul d vacat e th e courthous e o n o r befor e 5:0 0 p.m . eac h day .

fardC . Soodwi n U.S . Administrativ e La w Judg e Attachment(s ) - Servic e Lis t

' Thi s cas e wil

l en da t 120 0 hours Marc

h 5,2008 . Th

e cour t ha s anothe

r cas e scheduledt

o commence a

t 130 0 hours Marc

h 5 , 2008 .

### FA A Docke t No . CP09NM001 2 (Civi l Penalt

y Action ) SERVIC E LIS T ORIGINA L & ONE COP Y Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit

e 2W1000 ' ONE COP Y Tod dC . Emerson , Respondent' s Counsel Director , Governmen

t andLega l Affairs SkyWest Airline s 444 Sout h Rive r Roa d St . George , U

T 8479 0 TEL : 435-634-353 0 FAX : 435-634-350 5 Scot t R . Morris , Complainant' s Counsel Attorney , Office o f

th e Regiona

l Counsel Northwes t Mountai n Region , ANM- 7 Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 160 1 Lin dAvenue , S.W . Renton , W A 9805 7 TEL : 425-227-141 7 FAX : 425-227-100 7 Th e Honorable Richar

dC . Goodwin , Administrativ e La w Judg e Offic e of Hearings , M-2 0 U.S . Departmen

t o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jersey Avenue , S.E . Eas t Building GroundFloor , RoomEl2-32 0 Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : 202-366-213 9 Attorney-Advisor 202-366-512 1 Lega

l Assistan t FAX : 202-366-753 6

' Servic e wa s b

y U.S . Mail . Fo

r servic e in perso n o

r b y expeditedcourier , us e th e following address : Federa l Aviation Administration , 60 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W. , Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit

e 2W1000 , Washington , DC 20591 ; Attention : Hearing Docke t Clerk, AGC-430 .
§ 1280.26 Soliciting, vending, and debt collecting. ( a ) On NARA property or in NARA facilities, you may not: ( 1 ) Solicit for personal, charitable, or commercial causes;
( 2 ) Sell any products;
( 3 ) Display or distribute commercial advertising; or
( 4 ) Collect private debts.
( b ) The following activities are exceptions to the prohibitions in subsection (a): ( 1 ) Participating in national or local drives for welfare, health, or other funds that the Office of Personnel Management authorizes or that NARA approves (*e.g.,* the Combined Federal Campaign);
( 2 ) Employees collecting non-monetary items such as food, clothing, or toys, as approved by the Archivist or his/her designee;
( 3 ) Authorized employee organizations, including employee affinity groups, soliciting for membership dues or other organizational support, as approved by the Archivist or his/her designee; and
( 4 ) Authorized charitable support organizations, like the National Archives Foundation or a Presidential library foundation (*e.g.,* the museum store at the National Archives Building), conducting revenue-producing activities.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-1405

LAWRENCE VERLINE WILDER, SR., 

 Plaintiff - Appellant, 

 v. 

DONNA E. SHALALA, SECRETARY, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF 

HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, 

 Defendant - Appellee. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District 

Judge. (1:97-cv-02616-WDQ) 

Submitted: August 20, 2009 Decided: August 24, 2009 

Before WILKINSON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, 

Senior Circuit Judge. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Lawrence Verline Wilder, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

 Lawrence Verline Wilder, Sr., appeals the district 

court's order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we affirm. Wilder's request for rehearing and motion for 

appointment of counsel are denied. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
Federal Election Commission (FEC)

FY 2020 Plan - Service Contract Inventory Plan 
Background

Section 743 of Division C of the Fiscal Year (FY) 2010 Consolidated Appropriations Act, P.L. 

111-117, requires civilian agencies to prepare an annual inventory of their service contracts and 

to analyze the inventory to determine if the mix of Federal employees and contractors is effective 

or if rebalancing may be required. In addition to the previous year analysis FY2019, agencies 

shall submit FY 2020 plan. 

Scope and Rationale

FEC plan to evaluate the following Product Service Code (PSC) activities because the services 

represent the types of purchases that are needed to meet the general mission of the agency.

The following Special Interest Functions are as follows:

Product Service Code 

(PSC)

Description

DA01 IT and Telecom - Integrated 

Hardware/Software/Services Solutions

DA10 IT and Telecom- Software Maintenance 

Services

R499 Support-Professional; Other
§ 51.91 What information may the Director require in the application? An application for the Director's approval of an assignment or encumbrance will include, to the extent required by the Director in the circumstances of the transaction, the following information in such detail as the Director may specify in order to make the determinations required by this subpart: ( a ) All instruments proposed to implement the transaction;
( b ) An opinion of counsel to the effect that the proposed transaction is lawful under all applicable federal and state laws;
( c ) A narrative description of the proposed transaction;
( d ) A statement as to the existence and nature of any litigation relating to the proposed transaction;
( e ) A description of the management qualifications, financial background, and financing and operational plans of any proposed transferee;
( f ) A detailed description of all financial aspects of the proposed transaction;
( g ) Prospective financial statements (proformas);
( h ) A schedule that allocates in detail the purchase price (or, in the case of a transaction other than an asset purchase, the valuation) of all assets assigned or encumbered. In addition, the applicant must provide a description of the basis for all allocations and ownership of all assets; and
( i ) Such other information as the Director may require to make the determinations required by this subpart.
# 1987 Executive Calendars

**

----

   The Executive Calendar is published by the Executive Clerk’s office in the Office of the Secretary of the Senate. The calendar is published each day the Senate is in session. These calendars list executive business items such as unanimous consent agreements, resolutions, treaties, and nominations. The calendar is identified by the date published and a volume number, which both appear on the cover of the calendar. A final calendar is published at the end of each session of Congress. For a detailed summary of the sections of the Executive Calendar, see, About the Executive Calendar.
PS3-114 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT 

C.A. No. 21-1076

ROBERT CASON, Appellant 

VS. 

RHUEL A. JOHNSTON 

(W.D. Pa. Civ. No. 2:20-cv-04695) 

________________________________ORDER_________________________________ 

The Clerk of Court is directed to file the amended opinion provided herewith. 

Because the amended opinion revises only footnote #4 and does not affect the disposition 

of the case, the judgment remains unchanged. 

 By the Court, 

 s/ Paul B. Matey 

 Circuit Judge 

Dated: May 11, 2021 

SLC/cc: Robert Cason
# PAC Table 10d

&"Arial,Bold"&10&KFF0000This table was generated on 8/25/20.
Order issued November 24, 2014

S

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

________________________________________

No. 05-13-01571-CR

No. 05-13-01572-CR

________________________________________

RAY ANTHONY MYERS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

O R D E R

Before Justices FitzGerald, Lang, and Brown

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we GRANT the July 10, 2014 motion of 

Nanette Hendrickson for leave to withdraw as appointed counsel on appeal. We DIRECT the 

Clerk of the Court to remove Nanette Hendrickson as counsel of record for appellant. We 

DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order and all future correspondence to 

Ray Anthony Myers, TDCJ No. 1892893, Lindsey State Jail, 1620 FM 3344, Jacksboro, Texas, 

76458.

/ Douglas S. Lang/

DOUGLAS S. LANG

JUSTICE
#### § 212.54 Revision of designations.

Designations of National Forest System roads, National Forest System trails, and areas on National Forest System lands pursuant to § 212.51 may be revised as needed to meet changing conditions. Revisions of designations shall be made in accordance with the requirements for public involvement in § 212.52, the requirements for coordination with governmental entities in § 212.53, and the criteria in § 212.55, and shall be reflected on a motor vehicle use map pursuant to § 212.56.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 712 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                 S. 712

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To identify and address barriers to coverage of remote physiologic 
  devices under State Medicaid programs to improve maternal and child 
           health outcomes for pregnant and postpartum women.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Connected Maternal Online Monitoring 
Act'' or the ``Connected MOM Act''.

SEC. 2. COVERAGE OF REMOTE PHYSIOLOGIC MONITORING DEVICES AND IMPACT ON 
              MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH OUTCOMES UNDER MEDICAID.

    (a) Report to Congress.--Not later than 18 months after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Health and Human Services shall 
submit to Congress a report containing information on authorities and 
State practices for covering remote physiological monitoring devices, 
including limitations and barriers to such coverage and the impact on 
maternal health outcomes, and to the extent appropriate, 
recommendations on how to address such limitations or barriers related 
to coverage of remote physiologic devices under State Medicaid 
programs, including, but not limited to, pulse oximeters, blood 
pressure cuffs, scales, and blood glucose monitors, with the goal of 
improving maternal and child health outcomes for pregnant and 
postpartum women enrolled in State Medicaid programs.
    (b) State Resources.--Not later than 6 months after the submission 
of the report required by subsection (a), the Secretary shall update 
resources for State Medicaid programs, such as State Medicaid 
telehealth toolkits, to be consistent with the recommendations provided 
in such report.

            Passed the Senate December 4, 2024.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
118th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                 S. 712

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To identify and address barriers to coverage of remote physiologic 
  devices under State Medicaid programs to improve maternal and child 
           health outcomes for pregnant and postpartum women.
```
#### William Allison, Respondent, *v.*Elmer E. Hubbard, Appellant.

*Allison*v. *Hubbard,*115 App. Div. 894, affirmed.

(Argued November 1, 1907;

decided November 19, 1907.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered October 9, 1906, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action for conversion.

*Arthur L. Chapman*and *H. C. Teepell*for appellant.

*F. B. Pitcher*and *C. R. Walts*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray,'O’Brien, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ.
```

[Federal Register: September 15, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 178)]
[Rules and Regulations]               
[Page 56015]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr15se10-21]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services

42 CFR Part 411

 
Exclusions from Medicare and Limitations on Medicare Payment

CFR Correction

    In Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 400 to 413, 
revised as of October 1, 2009, on page 475, in Sec.  411.357, paragraph 
(a)(5)(ii) is revised and the second paragraph (a)(6) is removed.
    The revised text is set forth to read as follows;

Sec.  411.357  Exceptions to the referral prohibition related to 
compensation arrangements.

* * * * *
    (a) * * *
    (5) * * *
    (ii) Using a formula based on--
    (A) A percentage of the revenue raised, earned, billed, collected, 
or otherwise attributable to the services performed or business 
generated in the office space; or
    (B) Per-unit of service rental charges, to the extent that such 
charges reflect services provided to patients referred by the lessor to 
the lessee.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2010-23179 Filed 9-14-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```
Case 16-27165 Doc 25 Filed 09/28/16 Entered 09/29/16 09:51:45 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

ONE HUNDRED THIRD CONGRESS 

Convened January 5, 1993 

FIRST SESSION { 

SECOND SESSION { 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Monday, April 5, 1993 

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF WALTER J. STEWART, 

SECRETARY OF THE SENATE 

By Gerald A. Hackett, Executive Clerk 
Calendar I Treaty 

No. _ Doc. No. 

1 

TREATIES 

Subject Reported 

By 
2 

NOMINATIONS 

D&PJJn'KDM' OI' STATS 

E" to be 

C.ot:IDli!dor of tM Dtplrtmat of Stat.a. V10I 

I, ~ 

fEDIML llaaGDCt MAU.GDlDIT 

AGBMCY 

• ~,1 fl# I ~~·rWlllll<m 

.-JM# ~ft# ol thl! .,,..,.,.,....,.., 

Apr l, 93 Mr. Pell, 

Committee oo f~ 

Rdattons, WU.bout prmlllfl 

report 

Apr 1. 93 Mr Oleo.a. 

Committee on Gov ...... 

Affani. without prinMcl 

t
§ 1149.3 What is a claim? ( a ) Claim means any request, demand, or submission: ( 1 ) Made to the NEA for property, services, or money (including money representing grants, loans, insurance or benefits);
( 2 ) Made to a recipient of property or services from the NEA, or to a party to a contract with the NEA for property or services if the United States: ( i ) Provided such property or services;
( ii ) Provided any portion of the funds for the purchase of such property or services; or
( iii ) Will reimburse such recipient or party for the purchase of such property or services;
( 3 ) Made to the NEA for the payment of money (including money representing grants, loans, insurance, or benefits) if the United States: ( i ) Provided any portion of the money requested or demanded; or
( ii ) Will reimburse such recipient or party for any portion of the money paid on such request or demand; or
( 4 ) Made to the NEA which has the effect of decreasing an obligation to pay or account for property, services, or money.
( b ) A claim can relate to grants, loans, insurance, or other benefits, and includes the NEA guaranteed loans made by participating lenders.
( c ) Each voucher, invoice, claim form, or individual request or demand for property, services, or money constitutes a separate claim.
#### §§ 909.171-909.999 [Reserved]
#### § 909.151 Program accessibility: New construction and alterations.

Each building or part of a building that is constructed or altered by, on behalf of, or for the use of the agency shall be designed, constructed, or altered so as to be readily accessible to and usable by handicapped persons. The definitions, requirements, and standards of the Architectural Barriers Act (42 U.S.C. 4151-4157), as established in 41 CFR 101-19.600 to 101-19.607, apply to buildings covered by this section.
----

----

|   | (1)               The Report fully complies with the requirements of      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;      and |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2)               The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      the Company. |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| May      11, 2010 | /s/      Richard      R. Ivanovick |
|-------------------|------------------------------------|
|              | Richard      R. Ivanovick          |
|              | Chief      Financial Officer       |

----
#### §§ 1181.141-1181.148 [Reserved]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

IN THE INTEREST OF: H.H., A/K/A H.P., 

A MINOR

PETITION OF: S.V., MOTHER

:

:

:

:

:

No. 186 WAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 26th day of June, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.