alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
p.1 

OAR Box 1778 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

243) II-F-19 

Docket Number: 

A-90-06 

Printed 10/28/2008 9:51:03 AM Sheet 243 of 276 
P.2 

05/14 S31 18:06 DOE -PE-1 En 

MEMORANDUM TO: 

FROM: 

SUBJECT: 

tft&y^l!3W 

II-F-19 

Department of Energy 

Washington, OC 20585 

MAY 14 1991 

;J111 Rosenberg 

Assistant Administrator for A1r and Radiation 

EPA 

Linda StuntrlS 

Deputy Under Secretary for Policy, Planning and Analysis 

New Source Review €xclus1on for Pollution Control Projor.t.'s 

1$ Important to try one last timo to anrce on an exclusion 

review for pollution control projucts (PCPs). Therefore, I 

OOE believes 1t 

from new source review for pol .•-..,.«.. ..unuui ^i u^.:....-> y<^>^/. mciciun 

enclosing a proposal for such an exclusion based on your April 22 draft 

excerpt dealing with pollution control projects. 

am 

This proposal for a pollution control project exclusion 1s responsive to EPA's 

desire to apply an environmentally beneficial criterion to such projects. In 

addition, wo havo responded to EPA's other objectivo of maintaining the 

Integrity of other existing pollution control systems at the source. At the 

same time, the enclosed proposal ensures that a powerplant would not be forced 

to comply with a more stringent emissions rate than required by the State 

Implementation plan. 

I believe that EPA and DOE may be close to finding a mutually acceptable 

exclusion. If we can reach agreement within the next 24 hours, I hope it can 

be included 1n the WEPCo rule EPA 1s- drafting. 

cc: Oick Schmalensee 

t 

.LiL-Li ,• 

;i 

I.i; .,JN 12 1089 I'd) 

AIR DQCKETT_ 
P.3 

s . .•'•_* -*^ QS/1-i/gi 18: 09 DOE -PE-1 003 

NEW SOURCE REVIF.W EXCLUSlPJLEgB 

£QLL!JJ.IOt< CONTROL PROJECTS 

o Exclude pollution control projects (PCP's) from new source review unless 

tho Administrator determines,they are not environmentally beneficial. 

o Utility PCP's are presumed to be environmentally beneficial. This 

presumption 1s based on EPA's extensive knowledge of, and experience 

with, a wide vaNoty of PCP's used by the electric utility Industry.* 

These PCP's Include add-on types of emissions control equipment as well 

as fuel switching. 

o No presumption 1s being established, at this time, as to whether PCP's 

installed by non-utH1t1es are environmentally beneficial. 

o In addition, this exclusion does not apply 1f a PCP would cause the 

source to violate Its allowable emission rate (pounds per mill ion BTU) 

for any pollutant. 

o The PCP cannot cause a violation of a NAAQS, PSD Increment, or vislblity 

limitation. 

*Th1s knowledge and experience has been gained through NSPS, BACT, LAER, 

and programs to develop and evaluate emissions control technologies.
#### John O’Neil, Appellant, *v.*Thomas H. Karr, Respondent.

*O’Neil*v. *Karr,*115 App. Div. 881, affirmed.

(Argued October 23, 1907;

decided November 19, 1907.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered November 15,1906, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at a Trial Term in an action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been caused by defendant’s negligence.

*George B. Wellington*and *Owen D. Connolly*for appellant.

*Thomas S. Fagan*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Vann, Werner and Willard Bartlett, JJ. Not sitting: Chase, J.
SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

ONE HUNDRED SECOND CONGRESS 

Convened January 3, 1991 

FIRST SESSION { 

SECOND SESSION { 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Wednesday, October 2, 1991 

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF WALTER J. STEWART, 

SECRETARY OF THE SENATE 

By Gerald A. Hackett, Executive Clerk 
Unanimous Consent Agreement 

Ordered, That at 10 a.m. on Thursday, October 3, 1991, the Senate go into executive 

session to consider the nomination of Clarence Thomas to be an Associate Justice of the 

Supreme Court of the United States (Cal. No. 318); and 

Ordered, further, That a vote on the nomination occur at 6 p.m. on Tuesday, October 

8, 1991. 

(October 1, 1991) 
Calendar Treaty 

No. Doc. No. 

1 EX. B., 

95-1 

Calendar Message 

No. No. 

* 292 161 

* 312 572 

1 

TREATIES 

Subject 

Two Related Protocols to the Convention for 

the Unification of Certain Rules Relating 

to International Carriage by Air. as 

Amended (Montreal Aviation Protocols No. 3 

and 4). 

NOMINATIONS 

Nominee. Off ice, And Predecessor 

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM 

Lawrence B. Lindsey. of Virginia, to be a 

Member of the Board of Governors of the 

federal Reserve System for the unexpired 

term of fourteen years from February 1. 

1986, vice Manuel H. Johnson, resigned. 

DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

Arnold Lee Kanter, of Virginia, to be Under 

Secretary of State for Political Affairs, 

vice Robert Michael Kimmitt. 

[NEW REPORTS] 

Reported 

Bv 

Feb 5 91 Reported favorably 

by Mr. Pell, Committee on 

Foreign Relations, with a 

resolution of advice and 

consent to ratification 

with provisos. (Printed 

report--Ex. Rept 102-1 

together with minority 

views). 

Reported 

Bv 

Aug 29, 91 Mr. Riegle, 

Committee on Banking, 

Housing, and Urban Affairs, 

with printed report with 

additional views - Ex.Rept 

102-14. 

Sep 24, 91 Mr. Pell, 

Committee on Foreign 

Relations, without printed 

report 
2 

Calendar M~ge Nominee. Office, And Predecessor Reported 

No. No. Bv 

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED 

STATES 

318 456 Clarence Thomas, of Georgia. to be an Oct 1. 91 Mr. Biden. 

Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of Committee on the Judiciary, 

the United States, vice Thurgood Marshall. without recommendation with 

retired. printed report - E.x.Rept. 

102-15. Together with 

add1t1onal and supplemental 

v1ews. 

*S1gnlf1es nommee ' s commitment to respond to requests to appear and testify before any duly 

constituted committee of the Senate.
EXHIBIT 10.41
 
  Target
    
    
    Weighting onTitle
    
    Bonus
    
    
    Corporate GoalsChief Executive Officer
    
    
    40
    %
    
    
    100
    %President & Chief Operating Officer
    
    
    33
    %
    
    
    80
    %Executive Vice President &
Chief Scientific Officer
    
    
    33
    %
    
    
    80
    %Sr. Vice President,
Regenerative Medicine
    
    
    30
    %
    
    
    60
    %Vice President of Finance
    
    
    25
    %
    
    
    60
    %
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

September 29, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

No. 04-30329

Summary Calendar

KERMIT BROOKS, ET AL,

 Plaintiffs,

MARVIN WEATHERSBY,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

GREAT ATLANTIC AND PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, INC., ETC; ET AL,

 Defendants,

THE GREAT ATLANTIC AND PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, INC. 

D/B/A SAV-A-CENTER,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

(02-CV-2002-S)

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appellant Marvin Weathersby (“Weathersby”) challenges the
2

district court’s summary judgment dismissing his employment

discrimination suit against The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea

Company, Inc. (“A&P”). We affirm the district court’s judgment

because Weathersby failed to rebut A&P’s non-discriminatory reasons

for both Weathersby’s difference in salary and his demotion. 

We review a grant of summary judgment de novo applying the

same legal standards as the district court in determining whether

summary judgment was appropriate. Hudson v. Forest Oil Corp., 372

F.3d 742, 744 (5th Cir. 2004). “Summary judgment is proper if . .

. there is no genuine issue as to any material fact that the moving

party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Young v.

Equifax Credit Info. Servs., Inc., 294 F.3d 631, 635 (5th Cir.

2002). 

Weathersby worked for A&P in various locations with varied

titles and salaries. He complained of employment discrimination in

that he was paid less than Caucasian store managers and he was

demoted based upon his race, African-American. Moving for summary

judgment, A&P presented evidence of legitimate, non-discriminatory

reasons supporting both Weathersby’s salary changes and his

demotion, including his limited managerial experience and a

documented failure to adequately maintain the store he managed.

We have carefully reviewed the entire record of this case and

have fully considered the parties’ respective arguments. We AFFIRM

the district court’s granting of summary judgment for the reasons
3

articulated in its order and reasons filed March 10, 2004.

AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 627 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 627

   To amend title 31, United States Code, to limit the face value of 
                                 coins.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 2, 2023

    Mr. Lee introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
    referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 31, United States Code, to limit the face value of 
                                 coins.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Cancel the Coin Act''.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON FACE VALUE OF COINS.

    Section 5112 of title 31, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subsection (k)--
                    (A) by inserting ``having such nominal, or face, 
                values as the Secretary may determine subject to 
                subsection (bb)'' after ``platinum coins'';
                    (B) by striking ``denominations,''; and
                    (C) by adding at the end the following: ``The 
                Secretary shall not deposit, and the Board of Governors 
                and Federal Reserve Banks shall not accept as deposit, 
                any coin issued under this subsection at a Federal 
                Reserve Bank for the account of the Treasury.''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(bb) Limitation on Face Value.--The Secretary may not mint or 
issue any coin having a nominal, or face, value greater than $200.''.
                                 <all>
```
<pre>
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of Mobile Nation, Inc.
(the "Company") for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005 (the "Report"),
the undersigned hereby certify in their capacities as Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

1.      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: August 22, 2005          By:  /S/ REX MORDEN
                                -------------------
                                Rex A. Morden
                                Chief Executive Officer
                                (principal executive officer)


Dated: August 22, 2005          BY:  /S/  MICHAEL MCGHEE
                                --------------------------
                                Michael McGhee
                                Executive President, Finance
                                (principal financial and accounting
                                officer)
§ 1149.32 Do you have a right to review documents? ( a ) Yes. Once the ALJ issues a hearing notice, and upon written request to the reviewing official, you may: ( 1 ) Review any relevant and material documents, transcripts, records, and other materials that relate to the allegations set out in the complaint and upon which the findings and conclusions of the investigating official are based, unless such documents are subject to a privilege under Federal law. Upon payment of fees for duplication, you may obtain copies of such documents; and
( 2 ) Obtain a copy of all exculpatory information in the possession of the reviewing official or investigating official relating to the allegations in the complaint. You may obtain exculpatory information even if it is contained in a document that would otherwise be privileged. If the document would otherwise be privileged, only that portion containing exculpatory information must be disclosed.
( b ) The notice sent to the Attorney General from the reviewing official is not discoverable under any circumstances.
( c ) If the reviewing official does not respond to your request within 20 days, you may file a motion to compel disclosure of the documents with the ALJ subject to the provisions of this section. Such a motion may only be filed with the ALJ following the filing of an answer.
**EXHIBIT32.2**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

    Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Tasker Capital Corp. (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q/A for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Stathis Kouninis, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company as of and for theperiods presented in the Report.

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company andwill be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.
| October 26, 2006                                  |
|---------------------------------------------------|
|                                              |
|                                              |
| /s/ Stathis Kouninis                              |   |   |
| Stathis Kouninis                                  |
| Chief Financial  Officer, Treasurer and Secretary |
| (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)      |

 

----
Date of 

report 

1970 

Feb. 6 

~ruutt nf tqr luttrb ~tutrs NINETY-FIRST CONGRESS 

F S {Convened January 3, 1969 

IRST ESSION Ad" d D b 23 1969 JOurne ecem er , 

SECOND SESSION {Convened January 19, 1970 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Prepared under the direction of FRANCIS R. V ALEO, Secretary of the Senate 

By GERALD A. HAcKETT, Executive Clerk 

Monday, February 9, 1970 

NOMINATION 

Calendar Message Name ofnommee Office Predecessor 

No. No. 

U.S. MARSHAL 

9 9 Laurence C. Beard, of U S. marshal for the east- Jackie V. Robertson. 

Oklahoma ern district of Oklahoma 

for the term of 4 years. 

37-022-70-No. 127 

U S GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1970
Date of 

report 

1968 

Apr 10 

10 

~ruutr nf tqr luitr~ ~tutrs NINETIETH CONGRESS 

FIRST SESSION {Convened January ro, r967 

AdjOUtned December rs, I967 

SECOND SESSION fonvened January r5, r968 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

P1epa1ed under the d11ectzon of FRANCIS R VALEO, Secretary of the Senate 

By GERALD A HACKETT, Executtve Clerk 

Thursday, Apnl 11, 1968 

NOMINATIONS 

Calendar Message Name ofnommee Office Predecessor 

No No 

DEPARTMENT OF 

JUSTICE 

286 61 Otto Kemer of Il!Inols us c1rcmt Judge for the Wm G Knoch, re7th cu cmt tu·ed 

287 80 Rowland K Hazard, of U S attorney for the d1s- Reap pom tmen t 

Rhode Island tr1ct of the Canal Zone 

fm the term of 8 year~ 

85-022-68-No 145 

U s GOVERNMENT PR NTING OFFICE 1968
SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NINETY-EIGHTH CONGRESS 

FIRST SESSION { 

Convened January 3, 1983 

Adjourned November 78, 7983 

Convened January 23, 1984 

SECOND SESSION { 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Wednesday, April 11, 1984 

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF WILLIAM F. HILDENBRAND, 

SECRETARY OF THE SENATE 

By Gerald A. Hackett, Executive Clerk 
MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION 

Mar. 8, 1983-- Motion entered to reconsider the vote by which the resolution of 

ratification to the Montreal Protocols No. 3 and 4 (Ex. B., 95-1) was defeated--Mr. 

Baker. 
Calendar Treaty 

No. Doc. No. 

1 EX. B, 

95-1 

Calendar Message 

No. No. 

514 664 

* 539 758 

1 

TREATIES 

SUbJect 

Montreal Aviation Protocols Nos. 3 and 4 

NOMINATIONS 

Nommee, Office, And Predecessor 

THE JUDICIARY 

James Harvie Wilkmson III, of Virgm1a, to 

be Umted States Cucmt Judge for the 

Fourth Circuit, vice John D. Butzner, Jr., 

retired. 

[NEW REPORTS] 

DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

Barnngton Kmg, of Georg:ia, a Career 

Member of the Senior Foreign Service, 

Class of Minister-Counselor, to be 

Ambassador Extraordmary and 

Plempotent1ary of the United States of 

America to Brunei. 

Reported 

Bv 

Feb 10 83 Reported 

favorably, by Mr. Percy, 

Committee on Foreign 

Relations. with a proposed 

resolution of advice and 

consent to ratification 

with conditions (Pnnted 

rennrt--Ex. Rent. 98-1) 

Reported 

Bv 

Mar 15, 84 Mr. Thurmond, 

Committee on the Judiciary, 

without prmted report. 

Apr 10, 84 Mr. Percy, 

Committee on Foreign 

Relations, without printed 

report. 
2 

Calendar Message Nominee, Office, And Predecessor Reported 

No. No. Bv 

DEPARTMENT OF STATE -- Con. 

* 540 785 Stephen Warren Bosworth, of Michigan, to be Apr 10, 84 Mr. Percy, 

Ambassador Extraordinary and Committee on Foreign 

Plenipotentiary of the United States of Relations, without printed 

America to the Republic of the report. 

Phillppines. 

* 541 782 The following-named Career Members of the Do. 

Senior Foreign Service, Class of Career 

Minister, for the personal rank of Career 

Ambassador in recognition of especially 

distinguished service over a sustained 

period: 

Lawrence S. Eagleburger, of 

Florida 

Arthur Adair Hartman, of New 

Jersey 

* 542 756 Gerald P. Carmen, of New Hampshire, to be Do. 

the Representative of the United States of 

America to the European Office of the 

United Nations, with the rank of 

Ambassador. 

BOARD FOR INTERNATIONAL 

BROADCASTING 

* 543 702 Edward Noonan Ney, of New York, to be a Do. 

Member of the Board for International 

Broadcasting for a term expiring April 28, 

1985 , vice Charles David Ablard, term 

expired. .. I *S19mf1es nom1nee s commitment to respond to requests to appear and testify before any duly 

constituted committee of the Senate. 
3 

NOMINATIONS PLACED ON THE SECRETARY'S DESK IN THE FOREIGN SERVICE 

Foreign Service nominations beginning Philip Birnbaum, and ending Ronald Allen Witherell, 

which nominations were received by the Senate and appeared in the Congressional Record of January 

30, 1984.
Argued and submitted December 21, 1992,

remanded in part; otherwise affirmed March 2, 1994

#### In the Matter of London, Bennie G., a Child. STATE ex rel JUVENILE DEPARTMENT OF MULTNOMAH COUNTY, *Respondent, v.*Bennie G. LONDON, *Appellant.*

(9010-82836; CA A74757)

869 P2d 903

Ellen K. Jones argued the cause for appellant. With her on the brief was Julie H. McFarlane.

Amy E. Alpaugh, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Charles S. Crookham, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.

*629-aBefore Richardson, Chief Judge, and Deits and Riggs,* Judges.

PER CURIAM

*

 Riggs, J., *vice*Durham, J.

*630PER CURIAM

Child appeals from an order of the juvenile court that found him to be within the court’s jurisdiction because of an act which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of possession of a controlled substance. ORS 419.476; ORS 475.992. We affirm the finding of jurisdiction but remand for entry of a modified order.

 Child makes three assignments. First, he argues that the state did not establish the element of possession required in ORS 475.992. On *de novo*review, ORS 419.561, we conclude that the evidence establishes, beyond a reasonable doubt, that child possessed cocaine as alleged in the petition. Child also argues that a crime laboratory report introduced by the state under ORS 475.235(3) was inadmissible, because that statute does not apply in a juvenile proceeding. He did not preserve this argument, and we decline to address it for the first time on appeal. *Ailes v. Portland*Meadows, *Inc.,*312 Or 376, 823 P2d 956 (1991).

In his final assignment, child contends that the juvenile court’s order incorrectly refers to robbery charges not adjudicated in the March 9,1992, hearing and requests that we remand to the juvenile court to correct the order. The state agrees that the order contains clerical errors. We remand to the juvenile court to correct the order.

Remanded for entry of modified order; otherwise affirmed.
Case 16-00523 Doc 20 Filed 12/08/16 Entered 12/09/16 12:35:29 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 4
Case 16-00523 Doc 20 Filed 12/08/16 Entered 12/09/16 12:35:29 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 4
Case 16-00523 Doc 20 Filed 12/08/16 Entered 12/09/16 12:35:29 Desc Main

Document Page 3 of 4
Case 16-00523 Doc 20 Filed 12/08/16 Entered 12/09/16 12:35:29 Desc Main

Document Page 4 of 4
§ 1206.50 What types of funding and cost sharing arrangements does the Commission make? ( a ) *Types of grants.* ( 1 ) *Matching grant.* A matching grant is a Federal grant awarded only after the applicant raises its share of non-Federal support for a project. We will match only funds raised from non-Federal sources, either monies provided by the applicant's own institution specifically for the project or from a non-Federal third-party source. The Commission does not ordinarily make matching grants.
( 2 ) *Outright grant.* Outright grants are those awards we make without any matching requirement. However, outright grants usually include a cost-sharing requirement.
( b ) *Cost sharing.* ( 1 ) Cost sharing consists of the applicant's contribution to the cost of the project. The Commission ordinarily expects the applicant to provide cost sharing in an amount equal to the amount of the Federal grant award. Exceptions to the one-to-one cost sharing requirement may be set by the Commission in specific grant opportunity announcements.
( 2 ) Cost sharing may include cash or in-kind contributions provided by the applicant or by a non-Federal third party.
( 3 ) As indicated in 2 CFR part 2600, we do not pay indirect costs from grant funds, but allow indirect costs to be used for cost sharing.
[71 FR 27624, May 12, 2006, as amended at 75 FR 66318, Oct. 28, 2010; 79 FR 76080, Dec. 19, 2014]