alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fox Entertainment Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David F. DeVoe, Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                           
|-----------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ David F. DeVoe                                         
|David F. DeVoe                                             
|Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|February 4, 2005
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                           (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ASI Entertainment, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31,
2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"),
Ronald J. Chapman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Philip A. Shiels,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, do each hereby certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section
1350), that to his knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
     the Company.


/s/    Ronald J. Chapman

Ronald J. Chapman
Chief Executive Officer
May 10, 2008


/s/    Philip A. Shiels

Philip A. Shiels
Chief Financial Officer
May 10, 2008

[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to ASI Entertainment, Inc. and will be retained by ASI Entertainment,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.]







</SEC-DOCUMENT>
















<PAGE>
SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NI~ETY-SEVENTH CONGRESS 

FIRST SESSION { 

Convened January 5, 1981 

Adjourned December 76, 1981 

Convened January 25, 1982 

SECOND SESSION { 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Tuesday, February 9, 1982 

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF WILLIAM F. HILDENBRAND, 

SECRETARY OF THE SENATE 

By Gerald A. Hackett. Executive Clerk 
1 

TREATIES 

Calendar Treaty Subject Committee 

No. Doc. No. Action 

31 Ex. B. Montreal A' iation Protocols 3 and 4. Dec. 16, 81 Reported 

95-1 favorably. with certain 

conditions and 

recommendations to the 

resolution of 

ratification, by Mr. 

Percy, Committee on 

Foreign Relations, with a 

printed report (Ex. Rept. 

97-45). 

NOMINATIONS 

Calendar Message Nominee. Off ice, And Predecessor Committee 

No. No. Action 

[NEW REPORTS] 

INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION 

* 614 687 Malcolm M. B. Sterrett. of Maryland, to be Feb 8, 82 Committee on 

a Member of the Interstate Commerce Commerce. Reported by 

Commission for the term of seven years Senator Packwood without 

from January 1, 1981, vice George M. printed report. 

Stafford. resigned. 

"'Signifies nominee's commitment to respond to requests to appear and testify before any duly 

constituted committee of the Senate.
#### Jane Remsen, Appellant, *v.*Charles A. Wingert, Respondent.

(Argued May 6, 1907;

decided May 21, 1907.)

*Remsen*v. *Wingert,*112 App. Div. 234, affirmed.

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered May 1, 1906, upon an order reversing a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term, and directing judgment in favor of defendant .on his counterclaim in an action to compel the specific performance of a contract for the purchase of real property.

*John Fhoen*and *William R. Wilder*for appellant.

*Theodore T. Baylor*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Gray, O’Brien, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ. Absent: Cullen, Ch. J.
Order entered October 18 , 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 13
- 00119
- CR RYAN WALLACE, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 265th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court C ause No. F10
- 73110
- R



### O RDER In his brief, appellant raises an issue related to the costs assessed against him. The record, however, does not contain a cost bill or other document with an itemized list of costs assessed in this case. Accordingly, we ORDER the Dallas County District Clerk to file, within FIFTEEN DAYS of the date of this order, a supplemental clerk’s record containing a detailed itemization of the costs assessed in this case, including but not limited to, specific court costs, fees, and cour t appointed attorney fees. In accordance with Texas Code of Criminal Procedure article 103.001, the cost bill shall be signed by the officer who charged the cost or the officer who is entitled to receive payment for the cost. We further ORDER that the su pplemental clerk’s record include adocument explaining any and all abbreviations used to designate a particular fee, cost, or court

appointed attorney fee.
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to Gary Fitzsimmons, Dallas County District Clerk; Dallas County District Clerk’s Office, Criminal Records Division; and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ DAVID EVANS JUSTICE
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In
connection with the Annual Report of A.G. Volney  Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David
F. Stever, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
knowledge:





(1)                 The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)                 The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








Date:  March
      26, 2009
              
              /s/
      DAVID F. STEVERName:
      David F. Stever
                Title:
      President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer
                (Principal
      Executive Officer
                and
      Principal Financial and Accounting
Officer)
Date of report 

1967 

July 25 

25 

25 

25 

25 

~ruatr nf tqr luitr~ ~tatrs NINETIETH CONGRESS 

FIRST SESSION-Began January 10, 1967 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Pre pared tmder the direction of FRANCIS R. V ALEO, Secretary of ~he Senate 

By GERALD A. HACKETT, Executive Clerk 

Thursday, July 27, 1967 

NOMINATIONS 

I Calendar I Message 

I 

Name o! nominee Office Predecessor No. No. 

FEDERAL MARITIME 

COMMISSION 

941 266 Ashton C. Barrett, of A Federal Maritime Com- Reappointment. 

Mississippi. missioner for the term 

expiring June 30, 1972. 

INTERSTATE 

COMMERCE 

COMMISSION 

942 239 Grant E. Syphers, of An Interstate Commerce Abe McGregor Goff. 

California. Commissioner for the 

remainder of the term 

expiring Dec. 31, 1973. 

943 278 Dale Wayne Hardin, of An Interstate Commerce Charles A. Webb. 

Illinois. Commissioner for the 

remainder of the term 

expiring Dec. 31, 1972. 

DEPARTMENT OF 

STATE 

944 2.57 Benjamin H . Oehlert, Jr., Ambassador Extraordiof Georgia. nary and Plenipotentiary 

of the United States of 

America to Pakistan. 

945 272 Kennedy M. Crockett, of Ambassador ExtraordiVirginia, a Foreign Serv- nary and Plenipotentiary 

ice officer of class 2. of the United States of 

I 

America to Nicaragua. 

85·-022-67-No. 71 

U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1967
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20463

STATEMENT OF CHAIRMAN MATTHEW S. PETERSEN

ON THE PASSING OF SENATOR ROBERT BENNETT

May 5, 2016 

I am deeply saddened to learn that Robert Bennett, former U.S. Senator from the 

State of Utah, has passed away. I had the privilege of working for Senator Bennett when 

he served as Ranking Member of the Senate Rules Committee and I was the committee’s 

Republican Chief Counsel. Senator Bennett was a remarkably intelligent man whose 

eloquence, command of policy details, and dedication to his constituents made him a 

model public servant. But the characteristics I will remember most about Senator Bennett 

are his kindness, his humility, his integrity, and his fundamental decency. I am a better 

person for having known and associated with Senator Bennett, and I will always be 

grateful for the example he set for me. My prayers go out to his wife Joyce and his family 

as they reflect upon and celebrate the life of a truly great man.
Case 16-30277 Doc 13 Filed 11/04/16 Entered 11/07/16 10:46:31 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
#### In the Matter of the Accounting of John G. Baum, as Administrator of the Estate of Fredericka Baum, Deceased, Appellant. Annie Durkel et al., Respondents.

*Matter of Baum,*121 App. Div. 496, appeal dismissed.

(Submitted January 6, 1908;

decided January 14, 1908.)

Motion to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Appellate • Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial depart*565ment, entered October 4,1907, which affirmed a decree of the Queens County Surrogate’s Court judicially settling the accounts of the administrator herein.

The motion was made upon the grounds that no questions of law were involved which could be reviewed by tbe Court of Appeals; that the exceptions" were frivolous and that the decree of the surrogate was supported by the findings of fact, which findings had been unanimously affirmed by the Appellate Division.

*Henry H. Merchant*for motion.

No one opposed.

Motion granted and appeal dismissed, with costs.
#### §§ 1170.5-1170.10 [Reserved]
§ 1171.6 Responsibilities for processing and responding to requests. ( a ) *Processing requests.* The NEH Office of the General Counsel (OGC) is the central office for processing requests for records, except when it's necessary for the NEH Office of Inspector General (OIG) to process a request to maintain the OIG's independence or ability to carry out its statutorily mandated duties. If the request is for OIG records, the NEH will inform the requester which office will be processing the request.
( b ) *Authority to grant or deny requests.* The NEH General Counsel (or designee) is authorized to grant or deny requests for NEH records (excluding requests for OIG records), and/or FCAH records. The NEH Deputy Inspector General (or designee) is authorized to grant or deny requests for OIG records. The NEH General Counsel (or designee) is authorized to grant or deny requests on any fee matters and requests for expedited treatment, including OIG-related requests.
( c ) *Consultations and referrals.* When the NEH receives a request for a record in its possession, the agency will determine whether another Federal government agency is better able to decide whether the record should or should not be disclosed under the FOIA. Ordinarily, the agency that originated a record will be presumed to be best able to determine whether to disclose it. ( 1 ) If the NEH determines that it is the agency best able to process the record in response to the request, then it will do so, after consultation with the other agency that has a substantial interest in the requested records.
( 2 ) If the NEH determines that it is not the agency best able to process the record, then it will refer the record (or portion thereof) to the other Federal agency, but only if that agency is subject to the FOIA.
( d ) *Notice of referral.* Whenever the NEH refers all or any part of the responsibility for responding to a request to another agency, the NEH will notify the requester of the referral, provide the name of the agency to which the referral was directed, and include that agency's FOIA contact information. NEH will notify the requester of the part of the request that has been referred, unless such notification would disclose information otherwise exempt. If notification to the requester about the referral would cause a harm meant to be protected against by the FOIA, NEH will coordinate with the agency rather than referring the records to it.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 18-0021

_________________

STATE OF MONTANA,

 Plaintiff and Appellee,

 v.

JASON PAUL VEGAS,

 Defendant and Appellant.

O R D E R

_________________

Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for 

submission on briefs to a five-justice panel of this Court. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record and to the 

Honorable Dan Wilson, District Judge.

For the Court,

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 18 2020

03/18/2020

Case Number: DA 18-0021
Honorable Cecil Fruett Opinion No. C-666

County Attorney HutchinsonCounty Re: Whether Article 23.04 Borger, Texas of the 1966 Code of Criminal Procedureauthorizes county clerks to issue "caplas"to persons other than the Dear Elr.

Pruett: sheriff. By your recent letteryou requestedan opinion of this office as to whether the oounty clerk has authority to issue a capias to persons other than the sheriff in misdemeanor cas.88.The ig66 Code of Criminal Proceduredefines the caplas inArticle 23.01, as follows:

"A *capiasjIs a writ issued by the court or clerk, and directed 'To any peace officer of the State of Texas', commandinghim to arrest a person accused of an offense and bring him before that court immedlatelx,;oron a day or at a term stated in the writ. The capias in misdemeanorcases is mentioned in Article 23.04 which reads as follows:

"In misdemeanorcases the caplas or summons shall issue from a court having jurisdlotlonof the case. The summons shall be issued only upon request of the attorney representingthe State and shall follow the same form and procedureas in a felony case." Article 23.04 providesdirectionsfor the issuance of a summons, but does not providedirectionsfor the issuance of a capias, The only d,irectlons for the issuance of a capias under the 1966 Code of Criminal Procedureare found in Article 23.01, heretofore quoted. Such Article clearlyprovides for the issuance of a capias to any peace officer of the State of Texas.

-3214-- -

HonorableCecil Pruett,page 2 (C-666 )

Therefore,It is the opinion of this office that Article 23.01 of the 1966 Code of Criminal Proceduregoverns the the court or the issuance of a oaplis under Artiole 23.04 and clerk is authorized $0 lssu? the oapias In a ananiireotthe same to any peace officer of

. SlJMMAHy tiedemeanorcase the State of

The county clerk, in misdemeanoroauea, has authority to issue a oaplas to any peace officer of the State of Texas. Yours very truly, WApoONER CARR Attorney General of Texas

APPROVED: OPINION COMMXTTE3 W. 0. Shultx, Chairman Ralph Rash PhllllpCrawford Howard M. Fender Sam Kelley APPROVEDFOR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL By: T. B. Wright Assistan;Attorney General

-3215-
§ 903.4 Requests for access to records. ( a ) Except as otherwise provided by law or regulation, an individual, upon request made in person or delivered in writing may gain access to his or her record or to any information pertaining to him or her which is contained in a system of records maintained by the Corporation, and to review the record and have a copy made of all or any portion thereof in a form comprehensible to him or her. An individual seeking access to a Corporation record may be accompanied by a person of his or her choosing. However, the Corporation will require a written statement from the individual authorizing discussion of his or her record in the accompanying person's presence.
( b ) A request under paragraph (a) of this section shall be directed to the Privacy Protection Officer at the place, times and in the manner prescribed in § 903.3(a) and (b). The request should include the following information: ( 1 ) The name of the individual;
( 2 ) If made in writing, the information required under § 903.3(b);
( 3 ) A description of system or systems of records which contain the record to which access is requested;
( 4 ) The approximate dates covered by the record; and,
( 5 ) A suggested date and time when the individual would like to view the record.
( c ) Requests which do not contain information sufficient to identify the record requested will be returned promptly to the requester, with a notice indicating that information is lacking. Individuals making requests in person will be informed of any deficiency in the specification of records or identification at the time that the request is made. The Privacy Protection Officer of the Corporation will require adequate personal identification before processing a request made in person.
# EUR-Lex - 12008E195 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008E195

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - PART THREE: UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS - TITLE XXII: TOURISM - Article 195 **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0135 - 0135 *

Article 195

1. The Union shall complement the action of the Member States in the tourism sector, in particular by promoting the competitiveness of Union undertakings in that sector.

To that end, Union action shall be aimed at:

(a) encouraging the creation of a favourable environment for the development of undertakings in this sector;

(b) promoting cooperation between the Member States, particularly by the exchange of good practice.

2. The European Parliament and the Council, acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure, shall establish specific measures to complement actions within the Member States to achieve the objectives referred to in this Article, excluding any harmonisation of the laws and regulations of the Member States.

--------------------------------------------------
#### § 1168.210 Reporting.

No reporting is required with respect to payments of reasonable compensation made to regularly employed officers or employees of a person.
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 204 (Monday, October 23, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 62122]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-8843]



[[Page 62122]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[USITC SE-06-055]


Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

Agency Holding the Meeting: International Trade Commission.

Time and Date: October 31, 2006 at 11 a.m.

Place: Room 101, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436

Telephone: (202) 205-2000.

Status: Open to the public.

Matters To Be Considered:
    1. Agenda for future meetings: none.
    2. Minutes.
    3. Ratification List.
    4. Inv. Nos. 731-TA-865-867 (Review) (Stainless Steel Butt-Weld 
Pipe Fittings from Italy, Malaysia, and the Philippines)--briefing and 
vote. (The Commission is currently scheduled to transmit its 
determination and Commissioners' opinions to the Secretary of Commerce 
on or before November 14, 2006.).
    5. Outstanding action jackets: None.
    In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, 
not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the 
agenda of the following meeting.

    Issued: October 18, 2006.

    By order of the Commission:
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 06-8843 Filed 10-19-06; 12:05 pm]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
§ 328.5 Guidelines for seaplane use of project waters. ( a ) All operations of the aircraft while upon the water shall be in accordance with the marine rules of the road for power boats or vessels.
( b ) Seaplanes on project waters and lands in excess of 24 hours shall be securely moored at mooring facilities and at locations permitted by the District Engineer. Seaplanes may be temporarily moored on project waters and lands, except in areas prohibited by the District Engineer, for periods less than 24 hours providing that— ( 1 ) The mooring is safe, secure, and accomplished so as not to damage the rights of the government or members of the public and
( 2 ) The operator remains in the vicinity of the seaplane and reasonably available to relocate the seaplane if necessary.
( c ) No commercial operation of seaplanes from project waters will be allowed without written approval of the District Engineer following consultation with and the necessary clearance from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and other appropriate public authorities and affected interests.
( d ) Seaplanes may not be operated at Corps projects between sunset and sunrise unless adequate lighting and supervision are available.
( e ) Requests for public commercial facilities in support of seaplanes will be handled under normal concession policies.
( f ) Permits for floating and nonfloating structures of any kind, in, on, or affecting project waters, under the management of the Resource Manager, including waters under lease, license or other outgrant agreement, shall be handled in accordance with the lakeshore management plan or policy statement for the project involved, § 327.19 of title 36, Code of Federal Regulations and, where required by statute or regulation, section 10 of the River and Harbor Act (approved March 3, 1899) and section 404 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972 (Pub. L. 92-500).
( g ) Appropriate signs should be employed to inform users of projects, or portions thereof, where seaplane operations are permitted.