alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 292.67 Operating plan approval—outstanding mineral rights. ( a ) Upon receipt of an operating plan, the authorized officer must review the information related to the ownership of the outstanding mineral rights and notify the operator that: ( 1 ) Sufficient information on ownership of the outstanding mineral rights has been provided; or
( 2 ) Sufficient information on ownership of outstanding mineral rights has not been provided, including an explanation of the specific information that still needs to be provided, and that no further action on the plan of operations will be taken until the authorized officer's receipt of the specified information.
( b ) If the review shows outstanding mineral rights have not been verified, the authorized officer must notify the operator in writing that outstanding mineral rights have not been verified, explain the reasons for such a finding, and that the proposed mineral operation cannot be conducted.
( c ) If the review shows that outstanding mineral rights have been verified, the authorized officer must notify the operator in writing that outstanding mineral rights have been verified and that review of the proposed operating plan will proceed.
( d ) The authorized officer shall review the operating plan to determine if all of the following criteria are met: ( 1 ) The operating plan is consistent with the rights granted by the deed;
( 2 ) The operating plan is consistent with the Six Rivers National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan; and
( 3 ) The operating plan uses only so much of the surface as is necessary for the proposed mineral operations.
( e ) Upon completion of the review of the operating plan, the authorized officer shall notify the operator in writing of one of the following: ( 1 ) The operating plan meets all of the criteria of paragraphs (d)(1) through (d)(3) of this section and, therefore, is approved;
( 2 ) The operating plan does not meet one or more of the criteria in paragraphs (d)(1) through (d)(3) of this section. Where feasible, the authorized officer may indicate changes to the operating plan that would satisfy the criteria in paragraphs (d)(1) through (d)(3) of this section and, thus, if accepted by the operator, would result in approval of the operating plan.
( f ) To conduct mineral operations beyond those described in an approved operating plan, the owner or lessee must submit, in writing, an amended operating plan to the authorized officer at the earliest practicable date. New operations covered by the proposed amendment may not begin until the authorized officer has reviewed and responded in writing to the proposed amendment. The authorized officer shall review a proposed amendment of an approved operating plan to determine that the criteria in paragraphs (d)(1) through (d)(3) of this section are met.
Date of 

report 

1968 

May 21 

21 

21 

&ruutr nf tqr luitt~ itatftl 

NINETIETH CONGRESS 

F:!~ST SESSION {Convened January 10, 1967 

AdJourned December 15, 1967 

S:ECOND SESSION fonvened January 15, 1968 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Pre pared under the ditection of FRANCIS R. V ALEO, Secretary of the Senate 

By GERALD A. HACKETT, Executive Clerk 

Wednesday, May 22, 1968 

NOMINATIONS 

Calendar Message Name ofnommea Ofllce Predecessor No. No. 

DEPARTMENT OF 

TRANSPORTATION 

315 138 John E. Robson, of lllinms __ Under Secretary of Transportat10n. 

316 139 Stanford G. Ross, of New General Counsel of the 

York. Department of Trans· 

portat10n. 

FEDERAL MARITIME 

COMMISSION 

317 104 George Henry Hearn, of A Federal Marttime Com- Reappomtment. 

New York. mtsslOner for the term 

exprring June 30, 1973. 

85-022--68--No. 158 

U S GOVERNMENT PRINTING! OFFICE ltl!
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of For the
Children, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December
31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the “Report”), I, Virginia K. Sourlis, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of my knowledge and belief:





1.    The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.    The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:
      February 27, 2009
                        By:
                        /s/ Virginia
      K. SourlisVirginia
      K. Sourlis
                          President
      and DirectorPrincipal
      Executive Officer
                          Principal
      Financial
Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

Notice is hereby given that Emergence Capital Partners SBIC, L.P., 160 Bovet Road, Suite 300, San Mateo, CA 94402, a Federal Licensee under the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended (“the Act”), in connection with the financing of a small concern, has sought an exemption under Section 312 of the Act and Section 107.730, Financings which Constitute Conflicts of Interest of the Small Business Administration (“SBA”) Rules and Regulations (13 CFR 107.730). Emergence Capital Partners SBIC, L.P. proposes to provide equity/debt security financing to Genius, Inc., One Waters Park Drive, Suite 200, San Mateo, CA 94403. The financing is contemplated for working capital and general corporate purposes.

The financing is brought within the purview of § 107.730(a)(1) of the Regulations because Emergence Capital Partners, L.P. and Emergence Capital Associates, L.P., all Associates of Emergence Capital Partners SBIC, L.P., own more than ten percent of Genius, Inc., and therefore Genius, Inc. is considered an Associate of Emergence Capital Partners SBIC, L.P. as detailed in § 107.50 of the Regulations.

Notice is hereby given that any interested person may submit written comments on the transaction to the Associate Administrator for Investment, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 Third Street, S.W., Washington, DC 20416.

Dated: October 6, 2006.

Jaime Guzmán-Fournier,

Associate Administrator for Investment.

#### 

[FR Doc. 06-8964  Filed 10-27-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8025-01-M
#### § 910.37 Fire and life safety.

As a complementary action to satisfying required District of Columbia codes related to fire safety, it is highly recommended that all new *development* be guided by standards of the NFPA Codes for fire and life safety and that all buildings be equipped with an approved sprinkler system.
#### § 14.132 Food and water.

A marine mammal shall not be transported for more than a period of 36 hours without being offered suitable food unless the shipper's written instructions or the shipper's attendant travelling with the mammal direct otherwise. After feeding, a marine mammal shall be rested for 6 hours prior to resuming transport.
Exhibit 10(v)
                              ASSIGNMENT OF LEASES

This Assignment of Leases is made this 1st day of December,  1999, between Abdul
Rashid Afridi,  hereinafter "Assignor",  and A-Z South State Corporation, a Utah
corporation, hereinafter "Assignee."

In  consideration  of  the  sum of TEN  DOLLARS  and  other  good  and  valuable
consideration,  receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, Assignor hereby assigns
to Assignee all of the right,  title,  estate and interest of the undersigned in
and to those certain Leases ("Leases") identified on Exhibit "A" attached hereto
and incorporated herein by this reference,  which Leases cover that certain real
property located in Salt Lake County, more particularly described as follows:

         Lots  32,33 and 34,  Block 1,  SOUTH MAIN  STREET  ADDITION,  PLAT "A",
         according to the official  plat  thereof,  as recorded in the office of
         the County Recorder of said County.

Assignor  warrants and represents  that the Leases are in full force and effect,
that Assignor is not in default or breach of the Leases, and has no knowledge of
any claims,  offsets, or defenses of the tenants under the Leases, nor any basis
for asserting the same. Assignor further represents that rents due subsequent to
this  assignment  have  not been  paid in  advance  by the  tenants,  except  as
disclosed to the Assignee.

Pursuant to the Agreement of Purchase and Sale dated November 12, 1999, Assignor
also assigns and transfers to the Assignee any other contracts,  warranties,  or
rights relating to the Property operated.

Assignee  hereby  accepts this  assignment by Assignor and agrees to fulfill the
terms and  conditions  of the  Leases  described  herein  as they  relate to the
performance of the  Lessor/Landlord,  and to hold harmless and protect  Assignor
from any default therein.

ASSIGNOR:




By:  /s/  Abdul Rashid Afridi
   ----------------------------------------
Abdul Rashid Afridi

ASSIGNEE:

A-Z South State Corporation, a Utah Corporation


/s/  Richard D. Surber
------------------------------------------
By:  Richard D. Surber
Its:  President

                                       65
#### § 1174.4 Who investigates program fraud.

The Inspector General, or his or her designee, is the investigating official responsible for investigating allegations that a person has made a false claim or statement. In this regard, the Inspector General has authority under the PFCRA and the Inspector General Act of 1978, 5 U.S.C. App. 3, as amended, to issue administrative subpoenas for the production of records and documents.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

Supreme Court No. DA 20-0303

BRIAN JOHN TEMPLE,

Petitioner and Appellant,

v.

STATE OF MONTANA,

Respondent and Appellee.

ORDER

Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the Appellant is 

given an extension of time until June 10, 2020 to prepare, file and serve the 

Appellant’s opening brief.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 10 2021

05/10/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0303
§ 1167.2 Applicability. This part applies to demands and requests for factual or expert testimony or for official records or information in legal proceedings, except that it does not apply to: ( a ) Demands upon or requests for an NEH employee to testify as to facts or events that are in no way related to his or her official duties or to the functions of NEH;
( b ) Demands upon or requests for a former NEH employee to testify as to matters in which the former employee was not directly or materially involved while at NEH;
( c ) Requests for the release of records under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552, or the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a;
( d ) Congressional demands and requests for testimony or records; and
( e ) Legal proceedings to which the United States is a party.
SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

ONE HUNDRED FOURTH CONGRESS 

FffiST SESSION { CONVENED JANUARY 4, 1996 

SECOND SESSION { 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Wednesday, March 29, 1995 

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF SHEILA P. BURKE, 

SECRETARYOFTHESENATE 

By Gerald A. Hackett, Executive Clerk 
1 

RESOLUTIONS 

CALENDAR Ex REs REPOR'IED SUBJECT 

No No BY 
2 

TREATIES 

CALENDAR 'I'R&>.'IY REPORTED 

No. Doc. No. SUBJECT Bv 

-
3 

NOMINATIONS 

C.ALENDAR MEsSAGE 

NoMJNEE, OFFICE, AND PREDECESSOR 

REPORTED 

No No BY 

INTERNATIONAL BANKS 

* 31 2 Robert E. Rubin, of New York, to be United Feb 28, 95 Reported by Mr. Helms, 

States Governor of the International Monetary Comnnttee on Foreign Relations, 

Fund for a term of five years, Umted States without printed report. 

Governor of the International Bank for 

Reconstruction and Development for a term of 

five years; United States Governor of the 

Inter-American Development Bank for a term 

of five years; United States Governor of the 

African Development Bank for a term of five 

years; United States Governor of the Asian 

Development Bank; Umted States Governor of 

the African Development Fund; United States 

Governor of the European Bank for 

Reconstruction and Development. 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMSSION 

*' 49 79 Robert Pltofsky, of Maryland, to be a Federal Mar 23, 95 Reported by Mr. 

Trade Commissioner for the term of seven Pressler, Committee on 

years from September 26, 1994, vice Deborah Commerce, Sc1ence, and 

Kaye Owen, resigned. Transportation, without printed 

report. 

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

* 50 260 Damel Robert Glickman, of Kansas, to be .Mar 23,95 Reported by Mr. Lugar, 

Seeretary of Agriculture, vice Mlke Espy, Committee on Agriculture,. 

resigned. Nutrition, and Forestry, Wltbout 

pnnted report. 

I [NEW REPORTS] 

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY 

COMMISSION 

• 51 78 Thomas Hill Moore, of Florida, to be a Mar 28, 95 Reported by Mr. 

Commisstoner of the Consumer Products Pressler, Comnnttee on 

Safety Commission for the remamder of the Commerce, Science, and 

term expiring October 26, 1996, vice Transportabon, without printed 

Jacqueline Jones-Srmth, resigned. report. 

" S!gmfies nomtnee's commttment to l"e8pond to reqrusts to appear and testtfy before any duly constituted committee oftlw Senate 
4 

NOMINATIONS PLACED ON THE SECRETARY'S DESK
SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

ONE HUNDRED FIRST CONGRESS

Convened January 3, 1989

F IR S T SESSION {

SECOND SESSION {

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR

Wednesday, March 8 r 1989

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF WALTER J.STEW ART, 

SECRETARY OF THE SENATE

By Gerald A. Hackett, Executive Clerk
Unanimous Consent Agreement

Ordered, That at 11:30 a.m., on Wednesday, March 8, 1989, the Senate proceed to 

executive session to resume consideration of the nomination of John Goodwin Tower to be 

Secretary of Defense (Cal. No. 41).

(March 7, 1989)
1

NOMINATIONS

Calendar Message Nominee, Office, And Predecessor Reported

No. No. Bv

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

* 41 129 John Goodwin Tower, of Texas, to be Feb 28, 89 Mr. Nunn,

Secretary of Defense. Committee on Armed 

Services, unfavorably with 

printed report - Ex.Rept 

101-1. Together with 

Minority, Supplemental and 

Additional Views.

*Signifies nominee's commitment to respond to requests to appear and testify before any duly

constituted committee of the Senate.
2

NOMINATIONS PLACED ON THE SECRETARY'S DESK IN THE ARMY

Army nominations beginning * Barbara M. Alving, and ending * Edmund P. Wiker, which 

nominations were received by the Senate and appeared in the Congressional Record of January 3,

1989.

Army nominations beginning Eric D * Adrian, and ending Charles J * Yowler, which nominations 

were received by the Senate and appeared in the Congressional Record of January 3, 1989.

Army nominations beginning Shirley O Ford, and ending Charles Ferris, which nominations were 

received by the Senate and appeared in the Congressional Record of January 3, 1989.

Army nominations beginning Kenneth P Adgie, and ending Karl D Zetmeir, which nominations were 

received by the Senate and appeared in the Congressional Record of January 3, 1989.

Army nominations beginning Michael C Aaron, and ending Randal D Robinson, which nominations 

were received by the Senate and appeared in the Congressional Record of January 3, 1989.

Army nominations beginning Frank E. Chappie, II, and ending * Bonnie L. Smoak, which 

nominations were received by the Senate and appeared in the Congressional Record of February 8,

1989.
§ 907.3 Definitions. ( a ) *CEQ Regulations* means the regulations for implementing the procedural provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 as promulgated by the Council on Environmental Quality, Executive Office of the President, appearing at 40 CFR parts 1500-1509 (43 FR 55978-56007) and to which this part is a supplement.
( b ) The Act of October 27, 1972 or Act means the Pennsylvania Avenue Development Corporation Act of 1972, Pub. L. 92-578, October 27, 1972, 86 Stat. 1266 (40 U.S.C. 871).
( c ) *The Plan* means The Pennsylvania Avenue Plan—1974, prepared by the Pennsylvania Avenue Development Corporation pursuant to the Act of October 27, 1972.
( d ) *The Corporation* means the Pennsylvania Avenue Development Corporation, a wholly owned government corporation of the United States created by the Act of October 27, 1972.
( e ) *Board of Directors* means the governing body of the Corporation in which the powers and management of the Corporation are vested by the Act of October 27, 1972.
( f ) *EIS* means an environmental impact statement as defined in § 1508.11 of the CEQ Regulations.
( g ) *Final EIS* means The Final Environmental Impact Statement, dated September 1974, prepared by the Corporation on The Pennsylvania Avenue Plan—1974.
( h ) *Development Area* means the area under the Corporation's jurisdiction as specified in section 2(f) of the Act of October 27, 1972 and for which The Plan has been prepared and will be implemented by the Corporation.
( i ) *Decision Maker* means the Board of Directors, unless a delegation to the Chairman, a member or committee of the Board of Directors, or the Executive Director has been made by the Bylaws of the Corporation, a resolution of the Board of Directors, or an appropriate written delegation of authority.
( j ) *Private Developer* means an individual, firm, joint venture, or other entity other than the Corporation which seeks to construct, reconstruct, rehabilitate, or restore real property within the development area.
( k ) Other terms used in this part are defined in 40 CFR part 1508 of the CEQ Regulations.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsSimulation of glancing shock wave and boundary layer interactionShock waves generated by sharp fins, glancing across a laminar boundary layer growing over a flat plate, are simulated numerically. Several basic issues concerning the resultant three-dimensional flow separation are studied. Using the same number of grid points, different grid spacings are employed to investigate the effects of grid resolution on the origin of the line of separation. Various shock strengths (generated by different fin angles) are used to study the so-called separated and unseparated boundary layer and to establish the existence or absence of the secondary separation. The usual interpretations of the flow field from previous studies and new interpretations arising from the present simulation are discussed.Document ID19900002654Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsHung, Ching-Mao*(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateSeptember 1, 1989Subject CategoryFluid Mechanics And Heat TransferReport/Patent NumberA-89241NAS 1.15:102233NASA-TM-102233Meeting InformationMeeting: GAMM ConferenceLocation: DelftCountry: NetherlandsStart Date: September 27, 1989End Date: September 29, 1989Accession Number90N11970Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900002654.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Exhibit
      32


Section
      1350 Certifications




**STATEMENT
      FURNISHED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





The
      undersigned is the Chief Executive Officer and Treasurer or Principal Accounting
      Officer of Thorium Power, Ltd. This Certification is made pursuant to Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This Certification accompanies the
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Thorium Power, Ltd. for the three months ended
      September 30, 2008.





The
      undersigned certifies that such 10-Q Report fully complies with the requirements
      of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
      information contained in such 10-Q Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Thorium Power,
      Ltd. as of September 30, 2008.





This
      Certification is executed as of November 13, 2008.




*By:
                /s/ Seth Grae**Name:
                Seth Grae**Title:
                President, Chief Executive Officer and Director**(Principal
                Executive Officer)******By:
                /s/ James Guerra**Name:
                James Guerra**Title:
                Chief Financial Officer**(Principal
                Financial Officer)*




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Thorium Power, Ltd. and will be retained by Thorium Power and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 910.57 Curb-cut.

*Curb-cut* means that portion of the curb and sidewalk over which vehicular *access* is allowed. The number of *access* lanes for each *curb-cut* shall be specified in each set of *Square Guidelines.*
Exhibit 10.9


                                  CARL P. RANNO
                                ATTORNEY AT LAW*
                            2816 EAST WINDROSE DRIVE
                             PHOENIX, ARIZONA 85032
                                  602.493.0369
                                FAX 602.493.5119


December 11, 2000

American Soil Technologies, Inc.
215 N. Marengo, Suite 110
Pasadena, California, 91101
Attn: Neil Kitchen, President CEO

     Re: Retainer Agreement
     Re: Preparation of Sb-2 Registration Statement

Dear Neil,

     You have requested that I represent your company in the preparation and
filing of a Registration Statement known as a SB-2. I am willing to represent
the interests of the company in this endeavor. My fees for said representation
will be 7,500 common shares of the company, restricted pursuant to Rule 144,
which shall be registered with the subject registration statement. The filing
costs, which include the electronic fees as well as the SEC filing fees, shall
be the responsibility of the company. Included in my fees shall be the review,
preparation and filing of any and all responses to comments, which may be
received from the SEC as they relate to the registration statement.

     If the following is acceptable by the company please have it executed where
indicated and return it to me maintaining a copy for the company's records.

     Agreed and Accepted this 14th day of December

                                   Sincerely,

                                   /s/ Carl P. Ranno

                                   Carl P. Ranno

                                   American Soil Technologies, Inc.

                                   By /s/ Neil Kitchen

                                      Neil Kitchen, President/CEO