alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities and Exchange Commission will hold the following meeting during the week of October 30, 2006: 

A Closed Meeting will be held on Thursday, November 2, 2006 at 2 p.m. 

Commissioners, Counsels to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the Closed Meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters may also be present. 

The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), (9)(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a) (3), (5), (7), (9)(ii), and (10) permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the Closed Meeting. 

Commissioner Casey, as duty officer, voted to consider the items listed for the closed meeting in closed session. 

The subject matters of the Closed Meeting scheduled for Thursday, November 2, 2006 will be: 

formal orders of investigation;

institution and settlement of injunctive actions;

institution and settlement of administrative proceedings of an enforcement nature; 

adjudicatory matters; and

other matters relating to enforcement proceedings. 

At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting items. 

For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, please contact: 

The Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400. 

Dated: October 25, 2006. 

Nancy M. Morris, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 06-8963 Filed 10-25-06; 3:44 pm] 

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
# EUR-Lex - 12008M016 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008M016

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on European Union - TITLE III: PROVISIONS ON THE INSTITUTIONS - Article 16 **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0024 - 0024 *

Article 16

1. The Council shall, jointly with the European Parliament, exercise legislative and budgetary functions. It shall carry out policy-making and coordinating functions as laid down in the Treaties.

2. The Council shall consist of a representative of each Member State at ministerial level, who may commit the government of the Member State in question and cast its vote.

3. The Council shall act by a qualified majority except where the Treaties provide otherwise.

4. As from 1 November 2014, a qualified majority shall be defined as at least 55 % of the members of the Council, comprising at least fifteen of them and representing Member States comprising at least 65 % of the population of the Union.

A blocking minority must include at least four Council members, failing which the qualified majority shall be deemed attained.

The other arrangements governing the qualified majority are laid down in Article 238(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

5. The transitional provisions relating to the definition of the qualified majority which shall be applicable until 31 October 2014 and those which shall be applicable from 1 November 2014 to 31 March 2017 are laid down in the Protocol on transitional provisions.

6. The Council shall meet in different configurations, the list of which shall be adopted in accordance with Article 236 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

The General Affairs Council shall ensure consistency in the work of the different Council configurations. It shall prepare and ensure the follow-up to meetings of the European Council, in liaison with the President of the European Council and the Commission.

The Foreign Affairs Council shall elaborate the Union's external action on the basis of strategic guidelines laid down by the European Council and ensure that the Union's action is consistent.

7. A Committee of Permanent Representatives of the Governments of the Member States shall be responsible for preparing the work of the Council.

8. The Council shall meet in public when it deliberates and votes on a draft legislative act. To this end, each Council meeting shall be divided into two parts, dealing respectively with deliberations on Union legislative acts and non-legislative activities.

9. The Presidency of Council configurations, other than that of Foreign Affairs, shall be held by Member State representatives in the Council on the basis of equal rotation, in accordance with the conditions established in accordance with Article 236 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

--------------------------------------------------
#### § 1159.2 What is the purpose of these regulations?

The regulations in this part set forth the Endowment's procedures under the Privacy Act, as required by 5 U.S.C. 552a(f), with respect to systems of records maintained by the Endowment. These regulations establish procedures by which an individual may exercise the rights granted by the Privacy Act to determine whether an Endowment system contains a record pertaining to him or her; to gain access to such records; and to request correction or amendment of such records. These regulations also set identification requirements, prescribe fees to be charged for copying records, and establish exemptions from certain requirements of the Act for certain Endowment systems or components thereof.
#### Mary Rafferty, Respondent, *v.*Richard K. Anderson, Appellant.

(Argued April 10, 1907;

decided April 30, 1907.)

*Rafferty*v. *Anderson,*106 App. Div. 383, affirmed.

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered July 11, 1905, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term in an action to restrain the defendant from interfering with a certain fence erected by the plaintiff or trespassing upon the land inclosed thereby.

*Thomas O' Connor*for appellant.

*Eugene D. Flanigan*and *Benjamin W. Knower*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., O’Brien, Edward T: Bartlett, Haight, Vann and Hiscock, JJ. Not sitting: Chase, J.
§ 297.6 Environmental analysis requirements. ( a ) The determination of the effects of a proposed water resources project shall be made in compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). To the extent possible, authorizing agencies should ensure that any environmental studies, assessments, or environmental impact statements prepared for a water resources project adequately address the environmental effects on resources protected by the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act, and that the Department of Agriculture is apprised of ongoing analyses so as to facilitate coordination and identification of Wild and Scenic River related issues.
( b ) To the extent practicable, impacts on Wild and Scenic River values will be considered in the context of other review procedures provided by law. Authorizing agencies are encouraged to consult with the Forest Service in order to identify measures which could eliminate any direct and adverse effects, thereby increasing the likelihood of securing consent.
SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NINETY -EIGHTH CONGRESS 

Convened January 3, 1983 FIRST SESSION { 

SECOND SESSION { 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Tuesday, September 27, 1983 

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF WILLIAM F. HILDENBRAND, 

SECRETARY OF THE SENATE 

By Gerald A. Hackett, Executive Clerk 
MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION 

Mar 8, 1983-- Motion entered to reconsider the vote by which the resolution of 

ratification to the Montreal Protocols No. 3 and 4 (Ex. B., 95-1) was defeated--Mr. 

Baker. 
1 

TREATIES 

Calendar Treaty Subject Reported 

No. Doc. No. Bv 

1 EX. B, Montreal Aviation Protocols Nos. 3 and 4 Feb 10 83 Reported 

95-1 favorably. by Mr. Percy, 

Committee on Foreign 

Relations, with a proposed 

resolution of advice and 

consent to ratification 

with conditions (Printed 

reoort--Ex. Rept. 98-1) 

NOMINATIONS 

Calendar Message Nominee, Office, And Predecessor Reported 

No. No. Bv 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

* 312 450-8 William Perry Pendley, of Wyoming, to be an Sep 21. 83 Mr. McClure, 

Assistant Secretary of the Interior, vice Committee on Energy and 

Daniel N. Miller, Jr., resigned. Natural Resources, without 

printed report. 

[NEW REPORTS] 

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND 

URBAN DEVELOPMENT 

* 314 428 Phillp Abrams, of Massachusetts, to be Sep 26, 83 Mr. Garn, 

Under Secretary of Housmg and Urban Committee on Banking, 

Development, vice Donald I. Hovde, Housing, and Urban Affam, 

without Printed report. resiimed. .. *Stgntftes nominee's commitment to respond to requests to appear and testify before any duly 

constituted committee of the Senate.
**EXHIBIT 32.2****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**In connection with the Quarterly Report of EUPA International Corporation (the “Corporation”) onForm 10-QSB/A (No.1) for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kung-Chieh Huang, Chief Financial Officerof the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.     /s/ Kung-Chieh Huang     Kung-Chieh Huang
§ 61.11 Information collection. ( a ) The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under 44 U.S.C. 3507 *et seq.,* has approved the collection of information contained in this part. OMB has assigned clearance number 1024-0038 to this collection of information. The National Park Service (NPS) collects this information as part of the process for reviewing the procedures and programs of State and local governments participating in the national historic preservation program and the Historic Preservation Fund grant program. NPS will use the information to evaluate those programs and procedures for consistency with the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, and compliance with government-wide grant requirements. The obligation to respond is required to obtain a benefit under these programs. Note that a Federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. NPS provides no assurance of confidentiality to respondents with the exception of locational information concerning some properties that government historic preservation property inventories include. Pursuant to section 304 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, NPS tightly controls release of information when such release could have the potential of damaging those qualities which make a property historic.
( b ) We estimate the public reporting burden for the collection of this information to average 14.06 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing the burden, to Ms. Diane M. Cooke, Information Collection Officer, National Park Service, 1849 C Street NW, Washington, D.C. 20240 and to the Office of Management and Budget, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Attention: Desk Officer for the Department of the Interior (1024-0038), Washington, D.C. 20503.
#### § 219.18 Severability.

In the event that any specific provision of this part is deemed by a court to be invalid, the remaining provisions shall remain in effect.
# EUR-Lex - 11957E048 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11957E048

**TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY, PART TWO - FOUNDATIONS OF THE COMMUNITY, TITLE III - FREE MOVEMENT OF PERSONS, SERVICES AND CAPITAL, CHAPTER 1: WORKERS, ARTICLE 48 **

*

*

++++

ARTICLE 48

1 . FREEDOM OF MOVEMENT FOR WORKERS SHALL BE SECURED WITHIN THE COMMUNITY BY THE END OF THE TRANSITIONAL PERIOD AT THE LATEST .

2 . SUCH FREEDOM OF MOVEMENT SHALL ENTAIL THE ABOLITION OF ANY DISCRIMINATION BASED ON NATIONALITY BETWEEN WORKERS OF THE MEMBER STATES AS REGARDS EMPLOYMENT , REMUNERATION AND OTHER CONDITIONS OF WORK AND EMPLOYMENT .

3 . IT SHALL ENTAIL THE RIGHT , SUBJECT TO LIMITATIONS JUSTIFIED ON GROUNDS OF PUBLIC POLICY , PUBLIC SECURITY OR PUBLIC HEALTH :

( A ) TO ACCEPT OFFERS OF EMPLOYMENT ACTUALLY MADE ;

( B ) TO MOVE FREELY WITHIN THE TERRITORY OF MEMBER STATES FOR THIS PURPOSE ;

( C ) TO STAY IN A MEMBER STATE FOR THE PURPOSE OF EMPLOYMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS GOVERNING THE EMPLOYMENT OF NATIONALS OF THAT STATE LAID DOWN BY LAW , REGULATION OR ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION ;

( D ) TO REMAIN IN THE TERRITORY OF A MEMBER STATE AFTER HAVING BEEN EMPLOYED IN THAT STATE , SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS WHICH SHALL BE EMBODIED IN IMPLEMENTING REGULATIONS TO BE DRAWN UP BY THE COMMISSION .

4 . THE PROVISIONS OF THIS ARTICLE SHALL NOT APPLY TO EMPLOYMENT IN THE PUBLIC SERVICE .
§ 1149.16 What constitutes proof of service? ( a ) Proof of service is established by the following: ( 1 ) When service is made by registered or certified mail, the return postal receipt will serve as proof of service.
( 2 ) When service is made by personal delivery, an affidavit of the individual serving the complaint, or written acknowledgment of your receipt or of receipt by a representative, will serve as proof of service.
( b ) When served with the complaint, the serving party must also serve you with a copy of this part and 31 U.S.C. 3801-3812.
§ 1176.3 Criteria. Positions becoming vacant, unless excepted as provided by § 1176.8, will be reviewed to determine the feasibility of converting them to part-time. Among the criteria which may be used when conducting this review are: ( a ) Mission requirements.
( b ) Workload.
( c ) Employment ceilings and budgetary considerations.
( d ) Availability of qualified applicants willing to work part-time.
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

237 CA 11-00813 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, FAHEY, CARNI, AND SCONIERS, JJ.

MARGUERITE JAMES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

V ORDER
DAVID WORMUTH, M.D. AND CNY THORACIC SURGERY, P.C., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. (APPEAL NO. 1.)

WOODRUFF LEE CARROLL, SYRACUSE, FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.
MARTIN, GANOTIS, BROWN, MOULD & CURRIE, P.C., DEWITT (DANIEL P. LARABY OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Brian F. DeJoseph, J.), entered January 11, 2011 in a medical malpractice action. The order granted the motion of defendants at the close of plaintiff’s proof to dismiss the amended complaint.
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs ( see Smith v Catholic Med. Ctr. of Brooklyn & Queens , 155 AD2d 435; see also CPLR 5501 [a] [1]).

Entered: March 23, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
#### § 9.309 Appeals.

Written appeals made within 30 days of notification of a final decision by the Regional Director pursuant to this subpart shall be reviewed by the Director of the National Park Service. Resolution of any outstanding issues shall follow current Department of the Interior procedures for resolving interagency disputes.
#### § 13.108 Permit application procedures.

Except as otherwise specified in this subpart, the procedures set forth in § 13.55(a) govern application for any permit authorized pursuant to this subpart.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1177 

KA 12-00727 

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CENTRA, FAHEY, CARNI, AND WHALEN, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

PAUL A. COLLEN, ALSO KNOWN AS ALLEN COLLEN,

DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

 

LEANNE LAPP, PUBLIC DEFENDER, CANANDAIGUA (JOHN E. TYO OF COUNSEL),

FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

R. MICHAEL TANTILLO, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, CANANDAIGUA (HEATHER PARKER

HINES OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Ontario County Court (William F.

Kocher, J.), rendered October 26, 2011. The judgment convicted

defendant, upon a jury verdict, of assault in the second degree. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed. 

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him,

upon a jury verdict, of assault in the second degree (Penal Law §

120.05 [12]). Although we agree with defendant that it was improper

for the prosecutor to elicit testimony regarding whether defendant

agreed to give the police a written statement concerning the incident

(see People v De George, 73 NY2d 614, 619), we conclude that County

Court gave prompt curative instructions sufficient to cure any

prejudice to defendant (see generally People v Foster, 101 AD3d 1668,

1670, lv denied 15 NY3d 750).

Contrary to the further contention of defendant, viewing the

evidence in light of the elements of the crime as charged to the jury

(see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 349), we conclude that the

verdict is not against the weight of the evidence (see generally

People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495). The victim and other witnesses

testified that defendant punched the victim without provocation, and

defendant is the only person to have testified to the contrary. In

resolving issues of witness credibility, we give great deference to

the jury’s opportunity to view the witnesses, hear the testimony and

observe demeanor, and it cannot be said that the jury here failed to

give the evidence the weight it should be accorded (see People v

Mohamed, 94 AD3d 1462, 1464, lv denied 19 NY3d 999, reconsideration

denied 20 NY3d 934). 
-2- 1177 

KA 12-00727 

Finally, we reject defendant’s challenge to the severity of the

sentence.

Entered: November 15, 2013 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
Hogan Lovells US LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in the District of Columbia. “Hogan Lovells” is an international legal practice that includes Hogan Lovells US

LLP and Hogan Lovells International LLP, with offices in: : Alicante Amsterdam Baltimore Beijing Brussels Caracas Colorado Springs Denver Dubai Dusseldorf

Frankfurt Hamburg Hanoi Ho Chi Minh City Hong Kong Houston Johannesburg London Los Angeles Luxembourg Madrid Mexico City Miami Milan Monterrey

Moscow Munich New York Northern Virginia Paris Philadelphia Rio de Janeiro Rome San Francisco São Paulo Shanghai Silicon Valley Singapore Tokyo

Ulaanbaatar Warsaw Washington DC Associated offices: Budapest Jakarta Jeddah Riyadh Zagreb. For more information see www.hoganlovells.com

\\DC - 082908/000004 - 6101464 v1

Hogan Lovells US LLP

Columbia Square

555 Thirteenth Street, NW

Washington, DC 20004

T +1 202 637 5600

F +1 202 637 5910

www.hoganlovells.com

October 15, 2014

By Electronic Mail

Mr. Robert J. Finamore

Division Chief, Foreign Air Carrier Licensing

Office of International Aviation

U.S. Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Application of China Southern Airlines Company Limited for an Exemption

and an Amended Foreign Air Carrier Permit

(Guangzhou/Wuhan-San Francisco), Docket DOT-OST-1996-2008

Dear Mr. Finamore:

We have polled the U.S. air carrier representatives served with the above-referenced

application filed on October 10, 2014, and no carrier has objected to the relief sought

therein.

Sincerely,

Jonathan Echmalian

Transportation Specialist

jonathan.echmalian@hoganlovells.com

D +1.202.637.5439

cc: George U. Carneal

Lu Wei Xi

robert.wirick@aa.com; howard.kass@aa.com; sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com;

chris.walker@delta.com; gbleopard@fedex.com; sllunsford@fedex.com;

jhill@cooley.com; perkmann@cooley.com; matwood@cozen.com;

kevin.montgomery@polaraircargo.com; agoerlich@ggh-airlaw.com;

dan.weiss@united.com; steve.morrissey@united.com; anita.mosner@hklaw.com;

jennifer.nowak@hklaw.com
#### § 1148.2 How will the Arts Endowment make proactive disclosures?

Records that the Arts Endowment makes available for public inspection in an electronic format may be accessed through the Arts Endowment's open government page, available at *https://www.arts.gov/open.* The Arts Endowment will determine which of its records should be made publicly available, identify additional records of interest to the public that are appropriate for public disclosure, and post and index such records. The Arts Endowment will ensure that its website of posted records and indices is reviewed and updated on an ongoing basis.