alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1156.17 Investigation. ( a ) *Informal investigation.* ( 1 ) The Endowment will investigate complaints that are unresolved after mediation or are reopened because of a violation of a mediation agreement.
( 2 ) As part of the initial investigation, the Endowment will use informal fact-finding methods, including joint or separate discussions with the complainant and the recipient to establish the facts, and, if possible, resolve the complaint to the mutual satisfaction of the parties. The Endowment may seek the assistance of any involved State agency.
( 3 ) The Endowment will put any agreement in writing and have it signed by the parties and an authorized official at the Endowment.
( 4 ) The settlement shall not affect the operation of any other enforcement effort of the Endowment, including compliance reviews and investigation of other complaints which may involve the recipient.
( 5 ) The settlement is not a finding of discrimination against a recipient.
( b ) *Formal investigation, conciliation, and hearing.* If the Endowment cannot resolve the complaint during the early stages of the investigation, it shall: ( 1 ) Complete the investigation of the complaint.
( 2 ) Attempt to achieve voluntary compliance satisfactory to the Endowment, if the investigation indicates a violation.
( 3 ) Arrange for enforcement as described in § 1156.19, if necessary.
[63 FR 6876, Feb. 11, 1998, as amended at 68 FR 51385, Aug. 26, 2003]
#### § 1156.4 [Reserved]
#### § 1915.1014 2-Acetylaminofluorene.

Note:

The requirements applicable to shipyard employment under this section are identical to those set forth at [§ 1910.1003 of this chapter](/on/2024-09-23/title-29/section-1910.1003).

[[61 FR 31430](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/61-FR-31430), June 20, 1996]
#### § 9.100 How will NPS process my application?

If you propose operations in System units, other than Big Cypress National Preserve, we will process your application in accordance with §§ 9.101 through 9.104. If you propose operations in Big Cypress National Preserve, we will process your application in accordance with §§ 9.103 and 9.105.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
                      SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies that:

          1. The Annual Report on Form 10-K of SPSS Inc. for the period ended
     December 31, 2004, as amended by this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on
     Form 10-K, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
     hereof (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section
     13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
     SPSS Inc.

                                          By:     /s/ RAYMOND H. PANZA
                                            ------------------------------------
                                                      Raymond H. Panza
                                            Executive Vice-President, Corporate
                                            Operations, Chief Financial Officer
                                                        and Secretary

Date: April 22, 2005
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 200 (Tuesday, October 17, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 61073]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-8721]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Proposal Review Panel for Materials Research; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub L. 92-
463 as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Proposal Review Panel for Materials Research (DMR) 
<greek-i>1203.
    Dates & Times: November 2, 2006; 7:45 a.m.-9:30 p.m. November 3, 
2006; 8 a.m.-4 p.m.
    Place: University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
    Type of Meeting: Part--Open.
    Contact Person: Dr. Maija M. Kukla, Program Director, Materials 
Research Science and Engineering Centers Program, Division of 
Materials Research, Room 1065, National Science Foundation, 4201 
Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230, Telephone (703) 292-4940.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning further support of the Materials Research Science and 
Engineering Center.
    Agenda:

Thursday, November 2, 2006

7:45 a.m.-8:45 a.m. Closed--Briefing of Site Visit Panel and 
Continental Breakfast.
8:45 a.m.-12:15 p.m. Open--Welcome (institutional representatives, 
etc.).
12:15 p.m.-1:30 p.m. Closed--Lunch with students and postdocs.
1:30 p.m.-4:45 p.m. Open--Technical Presentation.
4:45 p.m.-5:45 p.m. Closed--Executive Session for Site Visit Team.
5:45 p.m.-7:30 p.m. Open--Site Visit Panel meets with MRSEC Director 
& Center Leaders.
7:30 p.m.-9:30 p.m. Closed--Dinner Meeting of Site Visit Panel.

Friday, November 3, 2006

8 a.m.-9 a.m. Closed--Executive session/Continental Breakfast/
Director's Response to Feedback.
9 a.m.-11:15 a.m. Open--Industrial Outreach and Other 
Collaborations.
11:15 a.m.-3:30 p.m. Closed--Executive Session of Site Visit Panel.
3:30 p.m.-4 p.m. Open--Debriefing with MRSEC Director and Center 
Leaders.
    Reason for Closing: The work being reviewed may include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information, financial data, such as salaries and personal 
information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. 
These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: October 12, 2006.
Susanne Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 06-8721 Filed 10-16-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
§ 1150.30 Which debts can the Endowment refer to the Treasury for collection by offsetting tax refunds? ( a ) The regulations in this subpart implement 31 U.S.C. 3720A, which authorizes the Treasury to reduce a tax refund by the amount of a past-due, legally enforceable debt owed to a Federal agency.
( b ) For purposes of this section, a past-due, legally enforceable debt referable to the Treasury for tax refund offset is a debt that is owed to the Endowment and: ( 1 ) Is at least $25.00;
( 2 ) Except in the case of a judgment debt, has been delinquent for at least three months and will not have been delinquent more than 10 years at the time the offset is made;
( 3 ) Cannot currently be collected under the salary offset provisions of 5 U.S.C. 5514;
( 4 ) Is ineligible for administrative offset under 31 U.S.C. 3716(a) by reason of 31 U.S.C. 3716(c)(2) or cannot be collected by administrative offset under 31 U.S.C. 3716(a) by the Endowment against amounts payable to the debtor by the Endowment;
( 5 ) With respect to which the Endowment has ( i ) given the debtor at least 60 days to present evidence that all or part of the debt is not past due or legally enforceable,
( ii ) considered evidence presented by the debtor, and
( iii ) determined that an amount of the debt is past due and legally enforceable;
( 6 ) Has been disclosed by the Endowment to a credit reporting agency as authorized by 31 U.S.C. 3711(e) and § 1150.12 of this part, unless the credit reporting agency would be prohibited from reporting information concerning the debt by reason of 15 U.S.C. 1681c;
( 7 ) With respect to which the Endowment has notified or has made a reasonable attempt to notify the debtor that: ( i ) The debt is past due, and
( ii ) Unless repaid within 60 days of the date of the Notice, the debt may be referred to the Treasury for offset against any refund of overpayment of tax; and
( 8 ) All other requirements of 31 U.S.C. 3720A and the Treasury regulations relating to the eligibility of a debt for tax return offset (31 CFR 285.2) have been satisfied.
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20463

ADVISORY OPINION 2015-14 

(Hillary for America)

SECOND CONCURRING STATEMENT OF 

COMMISSIONER ELLEN L. WEINTRAUB

Yesterday, after weeks of negotiation and drafting, the Commission agreed upon a 

narrow opinion that answered the Advisory Opinion Request put to us. This Advisory Opinion 

(AO 2015-14) allows DePauw University’s Hubbard Center Summer Internship Grant Program

to provide summer stipends to the University’s students without making a prohibited corporate 

contribution to a political committee. 

Earlier drafts included language that declared earlier Advisory Opinions to be 

superseded; that language could not garner the four votes required for Commission approval, and 

was not included in our Advisory Opinion. Last night’s fanciful concurring statement from my 

Republican colleagues declaring a raft of Advisory Opinions “superseded” has zero legal effect. 

Three Republican commissioners on their own simply cannot supersede Commission opinions.

Indeed, if they could, there would be little left of the law.

Under 52 U.S.C. § 30108(c)(1), any advisory opinion rendered by the Commission may 

be relied upon only by the requestor and “any person involved in any specific transaction or 

activity which is indistinguishable in all its material aspects from the transaction or activity with 

respect to which such advisory opinion is rendered” (emphasis added). This is a high bar. In fact, 

DePauw University’s stipend program for its undergraduate students who are fulfilling degree 

requirements is easily materially distinguishable from the activity upon which the Commission 

has previously opined.

1

 1 See, e.g., Advisory Op. 1979-67 (RNC-DNC) (large scholarships served as salary replacements for 

professional teachers who had no previous relationship to the university); Advisory Op. 1982-31 (Koenig) (request 

covered only the provision of legal and accounting services and was analyzed under the exception that deals directly 

with that activity (52 U.S.C. § 30101(8)(B)(viii))); Advisory Ops. 1985-17 & 2003-20 (requestors were separate 

scholarship funds, not universities, with no previous relationship to the applicants). Any attorney unable to 

materially distinguish these activities from those in AO 2015-14 is being willfully obtuse or just isn’t trying very 

hard.
Advisory Opinion 2015-14 (Hillary for America)

Second Concurring Statement of Commissioner Weintraub

Page 2 of 2

I will repeat what I said in my own statement yesterday: “[T]his opinion about an apolitical 

university internship stipend provides no cover to super PACs, (c)(4)s, or billionaires with political 

agendas seeking to subsidize the staff of their favorite candidates.” Anyone tempted to stray afield 

from DePauw’s program in reliance upon Advisory Opinion 2015-14 does so at their peril. 

February 12, 2016 Ellen L. Weintraub

Commissioner
[No. 1469.]

#### Bolles et al. v. Bird.

1. Appeal Bond. — Action upon — Demand.

An action may be maintained against the sureties upon an appeal bond . without having first made demand upon them.

2. Appellate Practice — Immaterial Error.

A judgment will not be reversed for an error that does not affect the substantial rights of the parties.

*Appeal-from the County Court of El Paso County.*

Mr. Wm. O’Brien, for appellants.

Mr. Robert G. Withers, for appellee.

Bissell, J.

This, was an action on an appeal bond against the sureties who gave it on an appeal from a judgment which was ultimately affirmed by this court. The only point presented by the argument for the appellant in his exceedingly short brief, is the suggestion that the action will not lie because the complaint does not allege a demand prior to the beginning of the suit and none was proven.

The proposition is supported by no authorities, and the only reference made does not uphold the appellants’ contention. The question has been settled by the supreme court and all the authorities bearing on it undoubtedly hold that a surety is a principal debtor and that no demand is necessary before action. If a demand is necessary the bringing of the suit is sufficient. *Anderson et al. v. Sloan,*1 Colo. 484; *Rockwell v. District*Court, 17 Colo. 118; 1 Brandt on Suretyship, § 97; *Coburn v. Brooks et*al., 78 Cal. 443 ; *Lomme v. Sweeney,*1 Mont. 584; *Pieper v. Peers,*98 Cal. 42.; *Flannagan v. Cleveland,*62 N. W. Rep. 297; *Carr v. Card,*34 Mo. 513.

*79Without objection proof was made of the issuance of an execution prior to the commencement of the suit and its return *nulla bona.*If an execution ought to have been issued and the return should be made in order to establish the liability of the sureties, a proposition to which we do not assent, but which we do not decide this was sufficiently shown. Under the rule we are not permitted to reverse a judgment where the substantial rights of the parties have not been affected. The situation' would furnish an adequate reason for its affirmance.

We are quite of the opinion that this appeal was prosecuted simply for delay. It is quite possible under the authority of *Rohrig v.*Pearson, 15 Colo. 127, we might have the right to impose a penalty. The matter however is in such doubt that in the absence of the statute, we shall simply affirm the judgment with a direction to tax all the costs in this court including the costs of the appellee’s brief against the appellant, as a penalty for the frivolous appeal. This will permit the appellee to recover his judgment with interest, and without expense.

The judgment is affirmed.

*Affirmed.*
§ 1172.33 Mediation. ( a ) *Referral of complaints for mediation.* Unless the age distinction complained of is clearly within an exception, NEH will promptly refer all complaints that fall within the jurisdiction of the regulations in this part, and that contain all information necessary for further processing, to the Mediation Agency designated by the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services.
( b ) Both the complainant and the recipient shall participate in the mediation process to the extent necessary to reach an agreement, or for the mediator to make an informed judgment that an agreement is impossible.
( c ) If the complainant and recipient reach a mutually satisfactory resolution of the complaint during the mediation period, the mediator shall prepare a mediation agreement in writing, to be signed by the complainant and recipient, and send a copy of the signed agreement to NEH. NEH will take no further action based on that complaint unless the complainant or the recipient has failed to comply with the agreement.
( d ) The mediator shall protect the confidentiality of all information obtained in the course of the mediation process, and no mediator shall testify in any adjudicative proceeding, produce any document, or otherwise disclose any information obtained in the course of the mediation process without prior approval of the head of the mediation agency.
( e ) If the complainant and recipient do not reach a mutually satisfactory resolution during mediation within sixty (60) days after NEH receives the complaint, the mediator shall return the complaint to NEH for investigation. The mediator may return a complaint at any time before the end of the sixty-day period if it appears that the complaint cannot be resolved through mediation or if an agreement is reached. The mediator may extend this sixty-day period, provided NEH concurs, for not more than thirty (30) days, if the mediator determines that resolution is likely to occur within such period.
**Exhibit
      23.1**











Consent
      of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm











We
      hereby
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on
      Form
      S-8 (File No. 333-133242) of our report dated March 6, 2007, relating to
      the consolidated financial statements of Severn Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries
      appearing in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
      December 31, 2006.








/s/
      Beard Miller
      Company LLP











Beard
      Miller Company LLP


Baltimore,
      Maryland


March
      12,
      2007
SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

ONE HUNDRED SECOND CONGRESS 

Convened January 3, 1991 

FIRST SESSION { 

SECOND SESSION { 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Tuesday, October 8, 1991 

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF WALTER J. STEWART~ 

SECRETARY OF THE SENATE 

By GeTald A. Hackett, Executive Clerk 
Unanimous Consent Agreement 

Ordered, That at 11 a.m. on Thursday, October 3, 1991. the Senate go mto executive 

session to consider the nomination of Clarence Thomas to be an Associate Jwmce of the 

Supreme Court of the United States (Ce.I. No. 318); a.nd 

Ordered, further, That a vote on the nomination occur at 6 p.m. on Tuesday. October 

8, 1991. 

{October 1, 1991) {Revised October 2, 19911 
l 

TREATIES 

Calendar Treaty Subject Reported 

No. Doc. No. By 

1 EX. B., Two Related Protocols to the Convention for Feb 5 91 Reported favorably 95-1 the Unification of Certain Rules Relating by Mr. Pell, Committee on 

to International Carriage by Air. as Foreign Relations. with a 

Amended (Montreal Aviation Protocols No. 3 resolution of advice and 

and 4). consent to ratification 

with provisos. (Printed 

report-Ex. Rept. 102-1 

together with minority 

views}. 

NOMINATIONS 

calendar Message Nominee:. Office. And Predecessor Reported 

No. No. Bv 

FSDERAL RBSBRVB SYSTEM 

* 292 161 Lawrence B. Lindsey. of Virginia. to be a Aug 29. 91 Mr. Riegle, 

Member of the Board of Governors of the Committee on Banking, 

Federal Reserve System for the unexpired Housin"' and Urban Affairs, 

term of fourteen years from February 1. with pnnted report with 

1986. vice Manuel H. Johnson. resigned. additional views - Ex.Rept. 

102-14. 

SUPRJtKB COURT OF THE UHITBD 

STATES 

318 456 Clarence Thomas. of Georgia. to be an Oct l, 91 Mr. Biden, 

Assoeiate Justice of the Supreme Court of Committee on the Judiciary, 

the United States, vice Thurgood Marshall, without recommendation with 

reured. printed report - Ex.Rept. 

102-15. Together with 

additional and supplemental 

views. 
2 

Calendar Message Nommee, Office, And Predecessor Reported 

* 

No. No. Bv 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

319 524 Arthur J. Rothkopf, of the District of Oct 3, 91 Mr. Hollings, 

Columbia, to be General Counsel of the Committee on Commerce, 

Department of Transportation, vice Phillip Sc1ence, and 

D. Brady. Transportation, without 

minted renort . .. , *S1gmf1es nommee s commitment to respond to requests to appear and testify before any duly 

constituted committee of the Senate. 

-

-
Date of 

report 

1987 

Apr. 18 

Date of 

report 

1987 

Apr. 14 

19 

~ruatr nf t~r luitr~ ~tafrn NINETIETH CONGRESS 

FIRST SESSION-Began January 10, 1967 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Prepared under the direction of FRANCIS R. V ALEO, Secretary of the Senate 

By GERALD A. HACKETT, Executive Clerk 

Monday, April 24, 1967 

TREATY 

Calendar I Treaw No SUbJeCt Actton of committee No 

15 Ex. D (90th Cong., Treaty on outer space __________ __________ Reported favorably by 

1st sess.) Mr. Fulbright, from 

the Committee on 

Foreign Relations, 

with a printed report. 

(See Ex. Rept. No. 8, 

90th Cong., 1st sess.) 

NOMINATIONS 

Calendar Message ::< ame ol nommee Office Predeeessor 

No. No 

AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOP· 

MENT 

129 86 Rutherford M Poats, of Deputy Administrator, 

Virginia. Agency for International 

Development. 

FARM CREDIT 

ADMINISTRATION 

141 140 Jonathan Davis, of A member of the Federal 

Massachusetts. Farm Credit Board, 

Farm Credit Administration, for a term 

I expiring Mar. 31, 1973. 

65-022--67--No.a7 

U S GOVE:RHNEHT PRINTIJtG OFFICE 1967
SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

ONE HUNDRED THIRD CONGRESS 

FIRST SESSION { 

SECOND SESSION { 

Convened January 5, 1993 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Wednesday, March 10, 1993 

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF WALTER J. STEWART, 

SECRETARY OF THE SENATE 

By Gerald A. Hackett, Executive Clerk 
Calendar I Treacy 

No. . Doc. No. 

1 

TREATIES 

Subject Reported 

By 
2 

NOMINATIONS 

Calendar Memqe Nominee. Off ice. And Predecc550r Reported 

• 

• 

No. No. Bv 

[NEW REPORTS] 

INTBRHATIONAL BANKS 

31 80 Lloyd Bentsen, of Texas, to be United Mar 9. 93 Mr. Pell. 

States Governor of the International Committee on Foreign 

Monetary Fund for a term of five years; Relations, without prin~ 

United States Governor of the reporL 

lnternauooal Bank for Reconstruction and 

Development for a term of five years; 

United States Governor of the 

Inter-American Development Bank for a term 

of f 1ve years; United States Governor of 

the African Development Bank for a term of 

ftve years; United States Governor of the 

Asian Development Bank; United States 

Governor of the African Development Fund; 

and United States Governor of the European 

Bank for Reconstruction and Development 

DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

32 9S Peter Tarnoff, of New York, to be Under Do . 

Secretary of State for Political Affairs. 

vice Arnold Lee Kanter resiirned. 

•S1gmf1es nomtnH's commitment to respond to requests to appear and testify before any duly 

const1tutlld committee of the Senate. 

..
Decided July 11, 1911.

#### STATE *v.*WEBB.

[117 Pac. 272.]

Criminal Law — Appeal—Dismissal.

Section 1621, L. O. L., provides that on appeal the clerk of the court must, within five days thereafter, or such further time as the court may allow, transmit a certified copy of the notice of appeal, etc.; and Section 1623 provides that the appellate court may, upon motion and notice, dismiss the appeal on failure to make a return required by Section 1621, unless good cause is shown. *Held,*that where more than five days elapsed between the last extension of time for filing a transcript and appeal and its actual filing in the Supreme Court the appeal will be dismissed, and the cause remanded below, with directions to re-sentence defendant.

On Motion to Dismiss.

From Multnomah: Robert G. Morrow, Judge.

Statement by Mr. Justice McBride.

The defendant, J. P. Webb, was convicted of the crime of murder in the first degree, and on the 20th day of October, 1910, was sentenced to death. On December 13, 1910, his notice of appeal to this court was duly served and filed, and on the same day a certificate of probable cause and stay of execution was granted, and an order made giving defendant until February 1st to file his transcript in this Court. No further order, extending such time, was ever made. The transcript was filed in this Court June 10, 1911.

*236Section 1621, L. O. L., is as follows:

“Upon the appeal being taken, the clerk of the court where the notice of appeal is filed must, within five days thereafter, or such further time as such court or the judge thereof may allow, transmit a certified copy of the notice of appeal, certificate of cause, if any, and judgment roll, to the clerk of the Supreme Court.”

Section 1623, L. O. L., provides that the appellate court may, upon motion and notice, dismiss the appeal in case of failure to make the return required by section 1621, unless good cause to retain the appeal is shown.

Dismissed.

*Mr. George J. .Cameron,*District Attorney, for the motion.

No appearance for appellant.

Mr. Justice

McBride delivered the opinion of the court.

More than five months elapsed between the last extension of time for filing a transcript on appeal and its actual filing in this Court. In compliance with Section 1621, L. O. L., above quoted, the appeal will be dismissed, and the cause remanded to the court below, with directions to re-sentence the defendant. Dismissed.