alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A21D0381. MONTE JILVEL GREEN v. THE STATE.

Monte Jilvel Green was convicted of child molestation and statutory rape in

2005. On March 22, 2021, Green’s probation as to that judgment was revoked. On

May 12, 2021, Green filed the instant application for discretionary review, in which

he challengesthe revocation of his probation.

1 However, Green has not provided this

Court with a copy of the March 22, 2021 order revoking his probation, or any other 

order. The Georgia Supreme Court obtained from the trial court a May 14, 2021 order

dismissing Green’s attempt to appeal directly from the revocation order. We lack

jurisdiction because Green hasfailed to properly present a challenge to any trial court

order.

In order to appeal froman order revoking probation, an application isrequired.

See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (5). However, Green has not provided a copy of the March

22, 2021 order revoking his probation, as required by Court of Appeals Rule 31 (c).

In addition, Green’s discretionary application is not timely as to that order, as it was

filed 51 days after the order’s entry. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (d) (a discretionary

application must be filed within 30 days of entry of the order at issue); Boyle v. State,

190 Ga. App. 734, 734 (380 SE2d 57) (1989) (the requirements of OCGA § 5-6-35

are jurisdictional, and this Court cannot accept an application for appeal not made in

compliance therewith). Green does not challenge any aspect of the May 14, 2021

dismissal order in his application, and therefore we have nothing to review as to that

1 Green filed his application in the Georgia Supreme Court, which transferred

it here. Case No. S21D1069 (June 1, 2021).

July 12, 2021
order. See Crippen v. Outback Steakhouse Intl., 321 Ga. App. 167, 170 (1) (741 SE2d

280) (2013) (“[T]his is a court for correction of errors of law committed by the trial

court where proper exception is taken.”). Accordingly, this application is hereby

DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

07/12/2021
# CongressionalCandidate Table 6a
Exhibit  31.1

I,  H.  Douglas  Saathoff,  certify  that:

1.  I  have  reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Nighthawk Systems,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material  fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made,  in  light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading  with  respect  to  the  period  covered  by  this  report;

3.  Based  on  my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer  as  of,  and  for,  the  periods  presented  in  this  report;

4.  I  am  responsible  for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures  (as  defined  in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
small  business  issuer  and  have:

a)  designed  such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls  and  procedures  to  be  designed under my supervision, to ensure that
material  information  relating  to  the  small  business  issuer, including its
consolidated  subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities,
particularly  during  the  period  in  which  this report is being prepared; and

b)  evaluated  the  effectiveness  of  the  small  business  issuer's disclosure
controls  and  procedures  and presented in this report my conclusions about the
effectiveness  of  the  disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period  covered  by  this  report  based  on  such  evaluation;  and

c)  disclosed  in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control  over  financial  reporting  that  occurred  during  the  small business
issuer's  most  recent  fiscal  quarter  that  has  materially  affected,  or is
reasonably  likely  to  materially  affect, the small business issuer's internal
control  over  financial  reporting;  and

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial  reporting,  to  the  small  business  issuer's auditors and the audit
committee  of  the  small  business  issuer's  board  of  directors  (or persons
performing  the  equivalent  functions):

a)  all  significant  deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses  in  the design or
operation  of  internal  control  over  financial reporting which are reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  small  business  issuer's ability to record,
process,  summarize  and  report  financial  information;  and

b)  any  fraud,  whether  or  not  material,  that  involves management or other
employees  who  have  a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
controls  over  financial  reporting.


Date:  May 20, 2005        By: /s/ H. Douglas Saathoff
                           ---------------------------
                           H. Douglas Saathoff,
                           Chief Executive Officer
WILLIAMS MULLEN 

Direct Dial: 703.760.5204 

kpomfret@wi II ia msm u lien. com 

August 26, 2015 

BY FEDEX 

UAS Integration Office 

West Building Ground Floor, Room w12-140 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Petition for Amendment to Docket FAA 2015-0001 and 

Docket FAA 2015-2205-0001 

Dear Sir or Madam: 

By letter dated May 15, 2015 (the "Eagle View Exemption Request"), Eagle View 

Technologies, Inc. requested an exemption pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization 

and Reform Act of 2012 to operate several classes of unmanned aircraft systems ("UAS"). By 

this letter we request to amend the Eagle View Exemption Request as follows: 

1. To clarify that the "DJI Phantom" referred therein refers to the DJI Phantom 3; 

2. To clarify that the "PrecisionHawk Lancaster" referred therein refers to the 

PrecisionHawk Lancaster HawkEye Mk-111; and 

3. To clarify that the "DJI Inspire" referenced therein refers to the DJI Inspire 1. 

Copies of the operating documents for each are included in a separate attachment. We 

request that you treat these attachments as confidential. 

Other than these revisions, there will be no change in the conditions and reasons 

relative to public safety that were included in the EagleView Exemption Request. In addition, 

we reaffirm that the EagleView Exemption Request includes the microdrone md4-1000 and the 

Aerialtronics Altura Zenith ATX8. 

Thank you for your consideration of this request. Please contact me at 703.760.5204 if 

or kpomfret@williamsmullen.com if you have any questions. 

KDP/kmb 

Confidential Attachments Under Separate Cover 

28759291_1 

8300 Greensboro Drive, Suite 11 00 Tysons Corner, VA 221 02 T 703.760.5200 F 703.748.0244 

williamsmullen.com I A Professional Corporation
[THERMO ELECTRON LOGO]

                                                                      MEMORANDUM

To:   Mike Kleine

From: Anne Pol

Date: 12/21/00

Re:   Revision to 7/18/00 Addendum to the Transaction Agreement dated 2/18/00

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This is an update to my memo dated 7/18/00 to reflect the change in your
minimum guaranteed transaction bonus. The new amount is $300,000.
# PAC Table 5c
§ 30.5 Variances, exceptions, and use permits. ( a ) Zoning ordinances or amendments thereto, for the zoning districts comprising the Whiskeytown Unit of the Whiskeytown-Shasta-Trinity National Recreation Area may provide for the granting of variances and exceptions.
( b ) Zoning ordinances or amendments thereto for each of the districts established by the regulations in this part shall contain provisions advising applicants for variances and exceptions that, under section 2(f) of the Act of November 8, 1965, the authority of the Secretary to acquire “improved property” without the owner's consent would be reinstated ( 1 ) if such property is made the subject of a variance or exception to any applicable zoning ordinance that does not conform to any applicable standard contained in the regulations in this part; or
( 2 ) if such property is put to any use which does not conform to any applicable zoning ordinance approved by the Secretary.
( c ) The Shasta County Planning Commission, or private owners of “improved property” may consult the Secretary as to whether the grant of any proposed variance or exception would terminate the suspension of his authority to acquire the affected property without consent of the owner, and may request the approval of a variance or exception by the Secretary: *Provided,* The Secretary is notified in writing at least 30 days in advance of the hearing on the application for the variance or exception. The Secretary within 30 days after the receipt of a request for approval of a variance or exception, shall advise the owner or the Commission whether or not the intended use will subject the property to acquisition by condemnation. If more than 30 days is required by the Secretary for such determination, he shall so notify the owner or Commission, stating the additional time required and the reasons therefor.
( d ) The Secretary shall be given written notice of any variance granted under, or exception made to the application of, a zoning ordinance or amendment thereof approved by him. The Secretary shall be provided a copy of every use permit granted by the Shasta County Planning Commission authorizing any use or development of lands within the boundaries of the Whiskeytown Unit of the recreation area.
Editorial Note on Part 7
Editorial Note: The Alphabetical Listing is updated annually by the Office of the Federal Register.

§ 7.59 Grand Portage National Monument. ( a ) *Snowmobiles.* After consideration of existing special situations, i.e. depth of snow, and depending on local weather conditions, the superintendent may permit the use of snowmobiles on the following designated routes within the National Monument: ( 1 ) The trail from County Road 73 (near the Grand Portage Trading Post) which moves across the Grand Portage to County Road 17 near the Catholic Church.
( 2 ) The powerline right-of-way road from Country Road 73 which moves across the Grand Portage Trail.
( 3 ) The logging road which moves across the Grand Portage Trail in NE 1 ⁄ 4, SE 1 ⁄ 4, Section 32, T64N, R6E.
( 4 ) Abandoned Highway 61 which moves across the Grand Portage Trail.
( 5 ) The logging road which moves across the Grand Portage Trail in SE 1 ⁄ 4, NW 1 ⁄ 4, Section 25, T64N, R5E.
( b ) *Fishing.* Unless otherwise designated, fishing in a manner authorized under applicable State law is allowed.
[47 FR 45005, Oct. 13, 1982, as amended at 49 FR 18451, Apr. 30, 1984]
#### Charles Cooper, Appellant, *v.*Henry B. Payne, Respondent.

*Cooper*v. *Payne,*111 App. Div. 785, affirmed.

(Argued October 29, 1907;

decided November 19, 1907.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered March 21, 1906, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a decision of the court at a Trial Term, a jury having been waived, in an action to recover on a promissory note.

*Andrew J. Nellis*and *J. 8. Bitterly*for appellant.

*Henry V. Borst*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cdllen, Ch; J., Gray, O’Brien, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ. Absent: Vann, J.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**HEARTLAND, INC.**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUNT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Heartland, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Trent Sommerville, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as added by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.         The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.         The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.

 

By: /s/ Trent Sommerville

Trent Sommerville

Chief Executive Officer, and

Chairman of the Board

 

November 14, 2005

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ("Section 906"), or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Heartland, Inc., and will be retained by Heartland, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
kld-ex103_18.htm



 

Exhibit 10.3

 

 

April 21, 2020

 

 

Dawn Wilson

 

 

Dear Dawn,

 

As part of the Salary Exchange Plan put it place during the COVID-19 global pandemic, your base salary will be temporarily reduced in exchange for an Options and RSU award, approved by the Board of Directors.

 

This change is effective from April 23, 2020 and will be reflected starting on the May 8, 2020 paycheck and will continue through the July 31, 2020 paycheck.

 

Current annualized salary:  $400,000

Calculated bi-weekly amount (annualized salary/26):  $15,385

New temporary annualized salary:  $320,000

New temporary calculated bi-weekly amount (annualized salary/26):  $12,308

Temporary % change:  20%

 

Value of your pay change for 3 months:  $20,000

Number of awarded Options:  5,015

Number of awarded RSUs:  1,656

Total value of Options/RSU on date of grant:  $25,003

 

All other terms and conditions of your employment remain unchanged.

 

To confirm your acceptance of the pay change, please sign and return this letter.

 

Sincerely,

 

/s/ Lindsey Hammond

 

Lindsey Hammond

Sr. Director, Global Talent

 

_____________________________________________________________________________________

 

I accept the above change to my base salary and acknowledge that this change is now part of my employment agreement.

 

NameDawn Wilson

 

Signature/s/ Dawn Wilson

 

Date5/7/2020
MUR808200097
Exhibit 13.1

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

(pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2006 of Koninklijke Ahold N.V. (the Company) as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the Commission) on the date hereof (the Report) and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Anders C. Moberg, President, Chief Executive Officer and Member of the Corporate Executive Board of the Company, certify, that, to my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



By:

/s/ Anders C. MobergName:

Anders C. MobergTitle:

President, Chief Executive Officer and Member of
the Corporate Executive Board


Date: March 29, 2007

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

KEITH CURTIS WILLIAMS,

Appellant,

 v.

Case No. 5D23-126

LT Case No. 45-2021-CF-000219-AXYX 

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

________________________________/

Decision filed March 7, 2023

Appeal from Circuit Court

for Nassau County,

James H. Daniel, Judge.

Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and

Jasmine Russell Dixon, Assistant Public

Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and 

Trisha Meggs, Bureau Chief, 

Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. 

MAKAR, JAY and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.
49–008 

109TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2d Session 109–613 

PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 5970, ESTATE 

TAX AND EXTENSION OF TAX RELIEF ACT OF 2006 AND 

H.R. 4, PENSION PROTECTION ACT OF 2006 

JULY 28, 2006.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mr. HASTINGS of Washington, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 966] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 966, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House 

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for the consideration of H.R. 5970, the 

Estate Tax and Extension of Tax Relief Act of 2006, under a closed 

rule. The rule provides one hour of debate on H.R. 5970 in the 

House equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking 

minority member of the Committee on Ways and Means. The rule 

waives all points of order against consideration of H.R. 5970. The 

rule provides one motion to recommit H.R. 5970. 

The resolution further provides for the consideration of H.R. 4, 

the Pension Protection Act of 2006, under a closed rule. The rule 

provides one hour of debate on H.R. 4 in the House equally divided 

among and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Ways and Means and the chairman and 

ranking minority member of the Committee on Education and the 

Workforce. The rule waives all points of order against consideration 

of H.R. 4. Finally, the rule provides one motion to recommit H.R. 

4. 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with REPORTS
2 

EXPLANATION OF WAIVERS

The Committee on Rules is not aware of any points of order 

against consideration of the bills. The waivers of all points of order 

are prophylactic in nature. 

Æ 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with REPORTS
§ 1203.6 Compliance information. ( a ) *Cooperation and assistance.* ACTION, to the fullest extent practicable, shall seek the cooperation of recipients in obtaining compliance with this part and shall provide assistance and guidance to recipients to help them comply voluntarily with this part.
( b ) *Compliance reports.* Each recipient shall keep records and submit to ACTION timely, complete, and accurate compliance reports at the times, and in the form and containing the information ACTION may determine necessary to enable it to ascertain whether the recipient has complied or is complying with this part. In the case in which a primary recipient extends Federal financial assistance to other recipients, the other recipients shall also submit compliance reports to the primary recipient as may be necessary to enable the primary recipient to carry out its obligations under this part. In general, recipients should have available for ACTION racial and ethnic data showing the extent to which members of minority groups are beneficiaries of federally assisted programs.
( c ) *Access to sources of information.* Each recipient shall permit access by ACTION during normal business hours to its books, records, accounts, and other sources of information, and its facilities as may be pertinent to ascertain compliance with this part. When information required of a recipient is in the exclusive possession of an other agency, institution, or person and this agency, institution, or person fails or refuses to furnish this information, the recipient shall so certify in its report and shall set forth what efforts it has made to obtain the information.
( d ) *Information to beneficiaries and participants.* Each recipient shall make available to participants, beneficiaries, and other interested persons the information regarding the provisions of this part and its applicability to the program for which the recipient received Federal financial assistance, and make this information available to them in the manner, as ACTION finds necessary, to apprise the persons of the protections against discrimination assured them by title VI and this part.
[39 FR 27322, July 26, 1974, as amended at 68 FR 51387, Aug. 26, 2003]
§ 292.22 Land category assignments. ( a ) *Land categories.* ( 1 ) All privately owned lands within the HCNRA are to be assigned to one of the following four land categories: ( i ) Farm/forest/grazing land.
( ii ) Mining land.
( iii ) Residential land.
( iv ) Commercial land.
( 2 ) Not later than August 12, 1994, a map or maps displaying the privately owned lands within the HCNRA and the land categories to which they have been assigned must be on file and available for public inspection at the Ranger's office. The Ranger shall give notice of the availability of this map or maps in the local newspapers of record.
( b ) *Changes in land category assignment.* Lands assigned to the Commercial, Residential, or Mining category may be reclassified as farm/forest/grazing land so long as the intended use or development is consistent with the standards in § 292.23 and the Ranger has given public notice of the proposed change in the local newspaper of record and has notified adjacent landowners and the affected county government at least 30 days prior to any decision on the proposed change.
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATIONS OF JOSEPH R. ROZELLE, PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER, PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of IPKV Holdings, Inc.. (the Company) for the period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, the undersigned officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|                     |                                                            
|-------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------------
|Date: April 15, 2009 |                                                            
|                     |                                                            
|                     |                                                            
|                     | /s/ Joseph R. Rozelle                                      
|                     | Joseph R. Rozelle                                          
|                     | Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer





The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filings of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.