alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
32





AURASOURCE,
INC.





CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(SUBSECTIONS
(a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,


UNITED
STATES CODE)





Pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b)
of section 1350, chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of AuraSource, Inc. (the “Company”), does hereby certify
with respect to the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period
ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the “Report”), to the best of the undersigned’s knowledge
that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of  1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








August
      13, 2009/s/
      PHILIP LIUChief
      Executive OfficerAugust
      13, 2009/s/
      ERIC STOPPENHAGENChief
      Financial Officer
1744 Haynes Ln 

Redondo Beach, CA

90278

To whom it may concern,

This memo is in regards to the AERIAL WEST, LLC. petition for 333 exemption. We would like to take this 

opportunity to support the exemption being granted.

Toast Our Vets Foundation has benefitted from the efforts of Bill Palmatary at Aerial West, LLC in our 

fundraising efforts, and look forward to using Aerial West UAV photography to promote our events via 

approved flights when possible.

Best regards,

Chi Szeto

Founder, Executive Director

Toast Our Vets Foundation

Toast Our Vets is recognized by the IRS as a 501(c)3, a fundraising Foundation focused on Veteran Issues.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 592 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 592

  To amend title 38, United States Code, to increase the mileage rate 
offered by the Department of Veterans Affairs through their Beneficiary 
   Travel program for health-related travel, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 1, 2023

Ms. Stabenow (for herself and Mr. Welch) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 38, United States Code, to increase the mileage rate 
offered by the Department of Veterans Affairs through their Beneficiary 
   Travel program for health-related travel, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Driver Reimbursement Increase for 
Veteran Equity Act of 2023'' or the ``DRIVE Act of 2023''.

SEC. 2. PAYMENTS OR ALLOWANCES BY DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS FOR 
              BENEFICIARY TRAVEL.

    (a) Minimum Payment Amount.--Subsection (g) of section 111 of title 
38, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
    ``(g) The Secretary shall ensure that the mileage rate described in 
subsection (a) is equal to or greater than the mileage reimbursement 
rate for the use of privately owned vehicles by Government employees on 
official business (when no Government vehicle is available), as 
prescribed by the Administrator of General Services under section 
5707(b) of title 5.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--Such section is further amended--
            (1) in subsection (a), by striking ``(at a rate of 41.5 
        cents per mile)'' and inserting ``(at a rate determined in 
        accordance with subsection (g))''; and
            (2) in subsection (b)(1), by striking ``and notwithstanding 
        subsection (g)(2) of this section''.
                                 <all>
```
#### McFarland v. Schuler, Sheriff.

A motion by appellant to amend his abstract by adding thereto the notice of appeal in full, showing that it was taken from the judgment and order denying a motion for a new trial, is properly granted, where the ab,.stract states that the notice of appeal was duly served and filed, but fails to state from what the appeal was taken.

(Opinion filed April 4, 1899.)

Appeal from circuit court, Sanborn county. Hon. Frank B. Smith, Judge.

Action by William McFarland against William Schuler, sheriff of Sanborn county. From a judgment for defendant, *517and an order denying a motion for a new trial, plaintiff appeals, and makes application to amend his abstract.

Application allowed.

JV. *J.*Dunham, for appellant.

*S. A. Ramsey*and *J. E.-*Whiting, for respondent.

Haney, J.

Appellant makes application, upon notice, to amend his abstract by adding thereto the notice of appeal, in full, with the indorsements thereon showing service upon the attorneys for respondent and the clerk of the courts. The proposed amendment shows that an appeal was taken from the judgment; and the order denying a new trial made after judgment. The statement of the abstract upon this subject is as follows: “N itice of appeal to the supreme court was duly served on the attorneys for the defendant, and on the clerk of the circuit court for Sanborn county, S. D , on the 16th day of May, 1898; and on the same day said notice was duly filed in the office of said clerk. ” As the abstract fails to state from what the appeal was taken, the proposed amendment is necessary and proper. It will be allowed, without terms.
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

CERTIFICATION 

 

I, Robert D. Jenkins, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of Tasker Capital Corp.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have: 

 

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) [Intentionally omitted in accordance with SEC Release No. 33-8392] 

 

(c) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(d) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, tothe small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the smallbusiness issuer’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

September30, 2005 

 

/s/ Robert D. Jenkins 

----
Les changements climatiques sont au cœur de l’actualité. Nous sommes tous concernés sans

exception. Ils marquent nos vies chaque jour. Ils ont des effets dévastateurs sur nos économies. Aussi, le prix devient trop lourd à payer tant en termes d’argent que de vies. Il faut donc accélérer l’action. C’est ce qu’encourage l’Organisation des Nations Unies pour le sommet mondial 2014 sur le climat qui aura lieu le 23 septembre 2014 à New York. Il rassemblera autour de cette cause commune les dirigeants d’Etats, de structure et la société civile pour impulser une nouvelle dy namique collective : la lutte contre le changement climatique. La situation est telle qu’il convient d’agir pour les générations actuelles en premier lieu tout en pensant aux générations futures. Ce tournant décisif mettra en lumière des actions exceptionnelles qui pourront être capitalisées et dupliquées en d’autres lieux. 

### Aujourd’hui **nous avons besoin d'une évolution homéopathique ou d'une**  **révolution sur cette problématique qui chaque jour touche de plus en**  **plus des populations affamées.**  Ilf aut un exemple fort significatif d’un pays membre permanent du conseil de sécurité de l’ONU qui puisse parler d’une voix et qui puisse se faire écho dans le monde entier. C’est le cas du CLIMATE ACTION PLAN du président des Etats
-Unis Mr Barack OBAMA, confortépar le CLEAN POWER PLAN de l’EPA (Environmental Protection Agency). Voilà une mesure audacieuse révolutionnaire qui doit être soulignée comme entrant dans le champ du MAPEX (Management de projets d’excellence). Pour féliciter cette excellente initiative, c’est avec un grand plaisir que nous avons préparé une vidéo qui montre que c’est bien un projet d’excellence car bien qu’il ait pris naissance aux Etats
-Unis, il concerne aussi toute la planète :

« MAPEX, CLIMATE ACTION PLAN CLEAN POWER PLAN »

Nous vous encourageons tous à découvrir ce projet d’excellence, à le soutenir, à en devenir des acteurs et surtout à le partager avec vos amis et connaissances.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                           (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ASI Entertainment, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31,
2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"),
Philip A. Shiels, Chief Financial Officer of the Company does hereby certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section
1350), that to his knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
         of the Company.


/s/    Philip A. Shiels

Philip A. Shiels
Chief Financial Officer
February 10, 2010

[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to ASI Entertainment, Inc. and will be retained by ASI Entertainment,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.]


</SEC-DOCUMENT>




























<PAGE>
Da te of rep 

19 

St>pt 

ort 

69 

() 

9 

() 

l) 

9 

9 

9 

9 

9 

-

~rttutr nf tqr luttr~ &tufts 

NINETY-FIRST CONGRESS 

FIRST SESSION {Convened January 3, I969 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Prepared under the direction of FRANCIS R. V ALEO, Secretary of the Senate 

By GERALD A. HACKETT, Executive Clerk 

Wednesday, September 10, 1969 

NOMINATIONS 

I Calendar Message Name of nommee Office Predecessor 

No. No. 

I U.S. CIRCUIT JUDGES 

I 

I 

I 560 524 Ozell M. Trask, of AnzomL u.s circUit JUdge, 9th A new position created 

i Circuit. under Public Law 

I 90-347, approved 

' June 18, 1968. 

I 

I 561 396 John F. Kilkenny, of _____ do ___________________ Do. 

Oregon. 

I 562 512 Eugene A Wright, of _____ do ___________________ Do. 

Washington. 

DEPARTMENT OF 

JUSTICE 

563 49() Wayman G Sherrer, of U.S attorney for the Macon L. Weaver. 

Alabama. northern distnct of 

Alabama for the term of 

4 years. 

1164 577 PPtcr l\iblls, of Mame ______ U.S attorney for the dis- Llovd P. LaFountam. 

tnct of Mame for the 

term of 4 years. 

565 423 Harold S. Fountain, of U.S marshal for the south- George M. Stuart. 

Alabama ern dtstrict of Alabama 

for the term of 4 years. 

566 580 John H. deWmter, of U.S. marshal for the dis- Adam J Walsh. 

I Maine. tnct of Maine for the 

term of 4 years. 

JG7 590 Marvin G. Washington, U.S. marshal for the Floyd Stevens. 

of Michigan. western d1strict of 

Mtchigan for the term of 

4 years. 

.)68 592 Charles S. Guy, of Penn- U.S. marshal for the James F. Delaney. 

sylvania. eastern district of Pennsylvania for the term of 

4 years. 

--

37-022-69-No 78 

U S GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1969
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 199 (Monday, October 16, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 60750]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-8668]



[[Page 60750]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Geological Survey


Bird Banding Laboratory Advisory Committee

AGENCY: U.S. Geological Survey.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The next meeting of the Advisory Committee on the Bird Banding 
Laboratory (Committee) will take place November 7 and 8, 2006, at the 
Red Lion Hotel, 3500 NE Cornell Road, Hillsboro, Oregon 97124. The 
meeting runs from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. each day. The purpose of the 
Advisory Committee, which is co-chaired by the USGS and the U.S. Fish 
and Wildlife Service, is to represent the interests of the bird banding 
community, including both game and non-game birds, in advising the U.S. 
Department of the Interior and the USGS on current and future 
management of the Bird Banding Laboratory (BBL). The agenda for this 
meeting will focus on finalizing the draft report, including numerous 
recommendations for improving the BBL's business operations and its 
level of customer service, begun with the Committee's first meeting in 
November, 2005.
    The meeting is open to all members of the interested public, and 
time on the agenda has been reserved at the conclusion of each day's 
work for the Committee to receive verbal comments (limited to 5 minutes 
per person) from the public. To speak before the Committee, please 
register in advance with Mr. Daniel James (see contact information 
below), the USGS Designated Federal Official (DFO) for the Committee).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Daniel L. James, 12201 Sunrise Valley 
Drive, MS 301, Reston, Virginia 20192; 703-648-4253, e-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#77131619281d161a1204370204100459101801"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b4d0d5daebded5d9d1c7f4c1c7d3c79ad3dbc2">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: October 10, 2006.
Susan D. Haseltine,
Associate Director for Biology.
[FR Doc. 06-8668 Filed 10-13-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4311-AM-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ANDREW SMALLWOOD,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 403 EAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 26th day of March, 2024

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 73 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 73

  To allow community supports to meet specific needs of families and 
  children through an electronic care portal under the MaryLee Allen 
              Promoting Safe and Stable Families program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 25, 2023

 Mr. Rubio (for himself and Mr. Casey) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To allow community supports to meet specific needs of families and 
  children through an electronic care portal under the MaryLee Allen 
              Promoting Safe and Stable Families program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Helping Households And Neighbors 
Distribute Services for Families Act'' or the ``Helping HANDS for 
Families Act''.

SEC. 2. MODERNIZED FAMILY SUPPORT SERVICES.

    Section 431(a)(1) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 629a(a)(1)) 
is amended--
            (1) by striking ``and'' at the end of subparagraph (E);
            (2) by striking the period at the end of subparagraph (F) 
        and inserting ``; and''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(G) the services referred to in this paragraph 
                may include the means of access and use of an 
                electronic or digital portal to facilitate the 
                provision of community support to care for and meet 
                specific needs of families and children.''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 51.16 How will the Director evaluate proposals and select the best one? ( a ) The Director will apply the selection factors set forth in § 51.17 by assessing each timely proposal under each of the selection factors on the basis of a narrative explanation, discussing any subfactors when applicable. For each selection factor, the Director will assign a score that reflects the determined merits of the proposal under the applicable selection factor and in comparison to the other proposals received, if any. The maximum aggregate score available for all selection factors will be 40 points, and every selection factor used must have a maximum score of one point or higher. Each selection factor will be scored as identified in the prospectus, subject to the following criteria: ( 1 ) The maximum score assignable for the principal selection factor described in § 51.17(a)(5) will be less than the lowest maximum score of the other principal selection factors described in § 51.17(a) with a score of one point for agreeing to the prospectus franchise fee (as defined in § 51.78) or, when the Director determines appropriate, the minimum acceptable franchise fee set forth in the prospectus.
( 2 ) The maximum score assignable for the secondary selection factor set forth in § 51.17(b)(1) will be less than the maximum score for the principal selection factor described in § 51.17(a)(5); and,
( 3 ) The maximum scores assignable for any additional secondary selection factors set forth in § 51.17(b) will be such that the maximum aggregate score assignable for all additional secondary selection factors will be less than the maximum score for the principal selection factor described in § 51.17(a)(5).
( b ) The Director will then assign a cumulative point score to each proposal based on the assigned score for each selection factor.
( c ) The responsive proposal with the highest cumulative point score will be selected by the Director as the best proposal. If two or more responsive proposals receive the same highest point score, the Director will select as the best proposal (from among the responsive proposals with the same highest point score), the responsive proposal that the Director determines on the basis of a narrative explanation will, on an overall basis, best achieve the purposes of this part. Consideration of revenue to the United States in this determination and in scoring proposals under principal selection factor five will be subordinate to the objectives of protecting, conserving, and preserving the resources of the park area and of providing necessary and appropriate visitor services to the public at reasonable rates.
[65 FR 20668, Apr. 17, 2000, as amended at 88 FR 90118, Dec. 29, 2023]
Argued June 22,

decided July 5, 1911.

#### DAVIS *v.*JOURNAL PUBLISHING CO.

[116 Pac. 1072.]

From Multnomah: Robert G. Morrow, Judge.

This is an action by L. M. Davis against the Journal Publishing Company to recover damages for slander. From a judgment of nonsuit, plaintiff appeals.

Affirmed.

For appellant there was a brief over the names of *Mr. J. F. Boothe*and *Mr. William P. Richardson,*with an oral argument by *Mr. Boothe.*

For respondent there was a brief over the names of *Mr. John H. Stevenson*and *Mr. John F. Logan,*with an oral argument by *Mr. Stevenson.*

Mr. Justice McBride

delivered the opinion of the court.

We have carefully read and considered the testimony in this case, and are of the opinion that the court below ruled correctly in granting a non-suit. A discussion of the facts in this opinion would simply incumber the Reports with matters of interest only to the parties, and useless even to them.

The judgment is affirmed. Affirmed.
# PAC Table 9b
Date of report 

----

1;iti!J 

Xov. 24 

25 

25 

2:-i 

NINETY-FIRST CONGRESS 

F S {Convened January 31 x969 IRST ESSION 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Prepared under the direction of FRANCIS R. V ALEO, Secretary of the Senate 

By GERALD A. HACKETT, Executive Clerk 

Wednesday, November 26, 1969 

NOMINATIONS 

I Calendar Message Name of uom!uee Office Predecessor 

No. No. 

DEPARTMENT OF 

JUSTICE 

685 720 William C. Black, of Texa~- U.R. mai-hal for the RobPrt T. ;\aqh, 

northPrn district of Textih for the term of 4 

years. NEW REPORTS 

AMBASSADOR 

690 73G Lewis Hoflacker, of the Ambl.ls~arlor Extraordinary I and Dhtrict of Columbia. and Plenipotentiary of 

747 the Unitell ~tates of 

America to the Federal 

Itepublic of Cameroon 

I and to ~erve concurrently I and without additional I 

compcn'iation a'i Am- i 

ba,::.ador Extraordinary 

and Plenipotentiary of i 

I the United State~ of 1 I America to the Repnulic 

I of Equatorial Gnin<:>n. 

UNITED NATIONS 

TRUSTEESHIP COUNCIL 

' 

691 757 Sam Harry Wright, of th<' Tlw H'prc-entatiYi) of the , 

District of Columbia. United Btatc-, of Am~rica : 

on the Tnhtee-hip I Council of the l'nited I 

Natiom:. 

U.S. ATTORNEY 

692 673 Bert C'. Hurn, of Mi~sourL-1 U.S. attorney for the we~t- I Cah·in K. Hamilton. I ern di~trict of ::V1isbouri I for the term of 4 years. i I 

37-022-69-No. 112 
2 

-- --· ·---- I Datto or j Calendat 1 Me''~~b'<~ Name of nonunee Office Predecessor 

repmt No. .No. 

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS 

I 

AND SPACE ADMINIS· 

TRATION I MMI 

Nov. 2;) 693 I 764 Ut,orge l\1 Loi\, of TP'I:a~- _ Deputy Administrator of Thoma'3 0. Paine, 

the National Aeronautics elevated. 

and Space Admini~-

tratwn. 

U.s. GOVJBHIIEBT PRIHTIRI OPPJCI1 1110