alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Managed Pension Assets Partnership  1990-C, Ltd.'s balance sheet and statement
of operations contained in its Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         41,471
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  46,590
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               88,061
<PP&E>                                         3,521,496
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,887,376)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 722,181
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          10,552
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     711,629
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   722,181
<SALES>                                        250,607
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               250,684
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  143,895<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                44,118
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            44,118
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   44,118
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes lease operating expenses, production taxes and depreciation, 
depletion and amortization expense.  Excludes general and administrative and
interest expense.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
# EUR-Lex - 12006E102 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12006E102

**Treaty establishing the European Community (consolidated version) - Part Three - Community policies - TITLE VII - Economic and monetary policy - Article 102 **

*
Official Journal C 321 E , 29/12/2006 P. 0084 - 0084 Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0072 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0217 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0034 - Consolidated version *

Article 102

1. Any measure, not based on prudential considerations, establishing privileged access by Community institutions or bodies, central governments, regional, local or other public authorities, other bodies governed by public law, or public undertakings of Member States to financial institutions, shall be prohibited.

2. The Council, acting in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 252, shall, before 1 January 1994, specify definitions for the application of the prohibition referred to in paragraph 1.

--------------------------------------------------
#### § 223.34 Advance payment.

Sale contracts shall provide that timber and forest products be paid for in advance of cutting, unless the contract authorizes the purchaser to furnish a payment guarantee satisfactory to the Forest Service. Advance payments found to be in excess of amounts due the United States shall be refunded to the current holder of the contract or to successors in interest. (90 Stat. 2959; 16 U.S.C. 472a.)

[43 FR 38008, Aug. 25, 1978. Redesignated at 49 FR 2761, Jan. 23, 1984]
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                           (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ASI Entertainment, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2010,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), Ronald J.
Chapman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Philip A. Shiels, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, do each hereby certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section
1350), that to his knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
     the Company.


/s/    Philip A. Shiels

Philip A. Shiels
Chief Executive Officer
May 11, 2010

[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to ASI Entertainment, Inc. and will be retained by ASI Entertainment,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.]






























<PAGE>
Case 16-27263 Doc 1 Filed 08/25/16 Entered 08/25/16 10:18:48 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 4
Case 16-27263 Doc 1 Filed 08/25/16 Entered 08/25/16 10:18:48 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 4
Case 16-27263 Doc 1 Filed 08/25/16 Entered 08/25/16 10:18:48 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 4
Case 16-27263 Doc 1 Filed 08/25/16 Entered 08/25/16 10:18:48 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 4
# EUR-Lex - 12007L/AFI/DCL/29 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12007L/AFI/DCL/29

**Treaty of Lisbon amending the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Community, signed at Lisbon, 13 December 2007 - A. Declarations concerning provisions of the Treaties - 29. Declaration on Article 87(2)(c) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union **

*
Official Journal 306 , 17/12/2007 P. 0259 - 0259 *

29. Declaration on Article 87(2)(c) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

The Conference notes that Article 87(2)(c) shall be interpreted in accordance with the existing case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union regarding the applicability of the provisions to aid granted to certain areas of the Federal Republic of Germany affected by the former division of Germany.

--------------------------------------------------
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 11, 2019

No. 04-19-00712-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF Z. M. A CHILD,

From the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018-PA-01197

Honorable Antonia Arteaga, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

In this accelerated appeal of the trial court’s order terminating Appellant’s parental rights, 

Appellant’s court-appointed attorney filed an Anders brief. In the brief, counsel states that after 

a professional evaluation of the record, counsel finds no reversible error, concludes the appeal is 

without merit and frivolous, and counsel attached a motion to withdraw. See Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967); In re R.R., No. 04-03-00096-CV, 2003 WL 21157944, at 

*4 (Tex. App.—San Antonio May 21, 2003, no pet.) (applying Anders procedure in a parental 

rights termination appeal).

Counsel informed Appellant of her right to file a pro se brief and to request a free copy of 

the appellate record. Counsel provided Appellant with a form request for a free copy of the 

appellate record, and the form lacks only Appellant’s contact information, date, and signature.

The State filed a letter waiving its right to file an appellee’s brief unless Appellant files a 

pro se brief.

If Appellant desires to file a pro se brief, we ORDER Appellant to do so within

TWENTY DAYS of the date of this order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a). 

If Appellant files a pro se brief, the State may file a responsive brief not later than 

TWENTY DAYS after Appellant’s pro se brief is filed in this court. See id. R. 38.6(b).

The motion to withdraw is HELD IN ABEYANCE pending further order of this court.

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 11th day of December, 2019.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ,

Clerk of Court
#### Bergold v. Puchta, appellant.

*Slander.*

These words: “He is no doctor; he bought his diploma for $50,” spoken of a person in his professional character, *held*actionable in themselves.

Appeal from an order made by Mr. Justice Barrett, denying defendant’s motion to set aside an order of arrest. The order was granted by Mr. Justice Dahiels, in an action for slander. The affidavit upon which it was granted sets out the slanderous words as having been uttered in the presence of one Weineise, as follows, viz.: “He [meaning the plaintiff] is no doctor; he bought his diploma for $50.”

No special damages are alleged.

The defendant denies having uttered these or any defamatory words about the plaintiff.

The plaintiff, to support his affidavit, introduced other affidavits tending to show other defamatory words uttered in the presence of different persons from those set out in the first affidavit.

*Henry Wehle,*for appellant.

An order of arrest should not be' granted in an action of slander, unless defendant is a transitory ' person or about to depart the State. 15 Abb. 229; 6 Abb. N. S. *23.*The affidavit does not set out a cause of action for slander. *42*Barb. 326; 17 N. Y. 54; 2 Barb. 630. Plaintiff must aver and prove special damage. 5 Johns. 188; 18 id. 124; id. 273; 17 id. 217; 15 Wend. 327; 24 id. 354; 3 Hill, 21; id. 139; 4 Barb. 504; 5 How. Pr. 171; 2 E. D. Smith, 388. It was incompetent for plaintiff to produce additional affidavits, charging other defamatory expressions, to support the one alleged in the moving affidavit. 3 How. 265; *53312 id. 197. Plaintiff should show reason why he cannot produce the affidavit of the party within whose personal knowledge the fact is. 12 Abb. 265; 21 How. 112; 33 Barb. 520.

*K D. Culver,*for respondent.

Daniels, J.

The affidavits read upon the motion warrant the conclusion that the defendant uttered and published of the plaintiff, as a physician, the words that “he is no doctor; he bought his diploma for $50; ” and the action is brought to recover damages for the uttering and publication of such words. These words contain an imputation of ignorance and want of skill, and having been spoken of the plaintiff in his professional character, they are, within the well-settled rule, actionable in themselves. That they were spoken of the plaintiff in his professional character is clearly shown by the words themselves; and, where that appears to be the fact, an action of slander may be maintained. It “is well-settled law that words published of a physician falsely imputing to him general ignorance or want of skill in his profession, are actionable in themselves, on the ground of presumed damage.” *Secor v. Harris,*18 Barb. 425, 426; *Fitzgerald*v. *Redfield,*51 id. 484. The order should be affirmed, with costs.

Davis, P. J., and Donohue, J., concurred.

*Order affirmed.*
§ 1212.640 Employee. ( a ) *Employee* means the employee of a recipient directly engaged in the performance of work under the award, including— ( 1 ) All direct charge employees;
( 2 ) All indirect charge employees, unless their impact or involvement in the performance of work under the award is insignificant to the performance of the award; and
( 3 ) Temporary personnel and consultants who are directly engaged in the performance of work under the award and who are on the recipient's payroll.
( b ) This definition does not include workers not on the payroll of the recipient (e.g., volunteers, even if used to meet a matching requirement; consultants or independent contractors not on the payroll; or employees of subrecipients or subcontractors in covered workplaces).
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 205 (Tuesday, October 24, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 62299]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-8870]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

United States Parole Commission


Public Announcement; Pursuant to the Government in the Sunshine 
Act (Pub. L. 94-409) [5 U.S.C. Section 552b]

Time and Date: 10 a.m., Thursday, October 26, 2006.

Place: 5550 Friendship Blvd., Fourth Floor, Chevy Chase, MD 20815.

Status: Open.

Matters to be Discussed: The following matters have been placed on the 
agenda for the open Parole Commission meeting:
    1. Approval of Minutes of Previous Commission Meeting.
    2. Reports from the Chairman, Commissioners, Chief of Staff, and 
Section Administrators.
    3. Proposed Amendment to 28 CFR Section 2.25 regarding the use of 
video conferencing for probable cause hearings.
    4. Proposed Amendment to 28 CFR Section 2.66 regarding the use of 
the advance consent procedure in the expedited revocation process.
    5. Discussion of District of Columbia Crime Emergency.
    6. Discussion of Process for Cases Designated Original 
Jurisdiction.

Agency Contact:  Thomas W. Hutchison, Chief of Staff, United States 
Parole Commission. (301) 492-5990.

    Dated: October 19, 2006.
Rockne Chickinell,
General Counsel, U.S. Parole Commission.
[FR Doc. 06-8870 Filed 10-20-06; 11:50 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-31-M
#### § 331.6 Public property.

Unless otherwise authorized in writing by the District Engineer, the destruction, injury, defacement, removal, or any alteration of public property including, but not limited to natural formations, paleontological features, historical and archaeological features and vegetative growth is prohibited. Any such destruction, removal, or alteration of public property shall be in accordance with the conditions of any permission granted.
§ 1149.13 When may the NEA issue a complaint? The NEA may issue a complaint: ( a ) If the Attorney General, or his/her designee, approves the referral of the allegations for adjudication in a written statement; and
( b ) In a case of submission of false claims, if the amount of money or the value of property or services demanded or requested in a false claim, or a group of related claims submitted at the same time, does not exceed $150,000.
```

[Federal Register: January 22, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 14)]
[Notices]               
[Page 3759-3760]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr22ja10-81]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

THE NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES

 
Federal Council on the Arts and the Humanities; Arts and 
Artifacts Indemnity Panel Advisory Committee

AGENCY: The National Endowment for the Humanities.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Pub. L. 92-463 as amended) notice is hereby given that a meeting of 
the Arts and Artifacts Indemnity Panel of the Federal Council on the 
Arts and the Humanities will be held at 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20506, in Room 730, from 9:30 a.m. to 5 p.m., on Monday, 
February 8, 2010.
    The purpose of the meeting is to review applications for 
Certificates of Indemnity submitted to the Federal Council on the Arts 
and the Humanities for exhibitions beginning after April 1, 2010.
    Because the proposed meeting will consider financial and commercial 
data and because it is important to keep values of objects, methods of 
transportation and security measures

[[Page 3760]]

confidential, pursuant to the authority granted me by the Chairman's 
Delegation of Authority to Close Advisory Committee Meetings, dated 
July 19, 1993, I have determined that the meeting would fall within 
exemption (4) of 5 U.S.C. 552(b) and that it is essential to close the 
meeting to protect the free exchange of views and to avoid interference 
with the operations of the Committee.
    It is suggested that those desiring more specific information 
contact Advisory Committee Management Officer, Michael P. McDonald, 
1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20506, or call 202-606-
8322.

Lisette Voyatzis,
Attorney-Advisor.
[FR Doc. 2010-1107 Filed 1-21-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7536-01-P
```
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARTIN VENTRESS, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

DIRECTOR DAVID KILGORE, California 

Department of Child Support Services; et al., 

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 21-55433 

D.C. No. 8:20-cv-02192-MWFMRW 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Michael W. Fitzgerald, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 19, 2022**

Before: SILVERMAN, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Martin Ventress appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing 

his action alleging federal and state law claims concerning child support payments. 

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district 

court’s sua sponte dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Omar 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

JAN 25 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 21-55433 

v. Sea-Land Serv., Inc., 813 F.2d 986, 991 (9th Cir. 1987). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Ventress’s action sua sponte after 

giving Ventress notice of its intention to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) and allowing 

Ventress to submit a written response and amended complaint. See Wong v. Bell, 

642 F.2d 359, 361-62 (9th Cir. 1981) (district court has authority under Rule

12(b)(6) to dismiss sua sponte for failure to state a claim); see also Ashcroft v. 

Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (to avoid dismissal, “a complaint must contain 

sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to state a claim to relief that is plausible 

on its face.” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)).

Ventress’s motions for judicial notice (Docket Entry Nos. 6 and 7) are 

denied.

AFFIRMED.
#### § 9.83 What information must be included in all applications?

All applications must include the information required by this section.

| All operations permit applications must include information on . . . | and must include the following detailed information . . . |
| --- | --- |
| (a) Ownership | documentation demonstrating that you hold a right, and the extent of such right, to operate within the System unit. |
| (b) The owner/operator | names, addresses, and other contact information for: (1) The operator; (2) The owner; (3) Any agents, assignees, designees, contractors, or other representatives of the operator including those responsible for overall management, field supervision, and emergency response of the proposed operations. |
| (c) Existing conditions and proposed area of operations | all the information required by [§ 9.84](/on/2024-09-23/title-36/section-9.84). |
| (d) Reclamation plan | (1) A description of the equipment and methods used to meet the operating standards for reclamation at [§ 9.116](/on/2024-09-23/title-36/section-9.116); and (2) A breakdown of the estimated costs that a third party would charge to complete reclamation as proposed in your reclamation plan. |
| (e) Use of water | (1) The source (including documentation verifying a water right), quantity, access route, and transportation/conveyance method for all water to be used in access road and pad construction, well drilling, stimulation, and production; and (2) Estimations of any anticipated waste water volumes generated and how they will be managed (i.e. handled, temporary stored, disposed, recycled, reused) throughout stages of the operation. |
| (f) Environmental conditions and mitigation actions | all the information required by [§ 9.85](/on/2024-09-23/title-36/section-9.85). |
| (g) The spill control and emergency preparedness plan | all the information required by [§ 9.86](/on/2024-09-23/title-36/section-9.86). |
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

In Re: ) BK No.:

)

) Chapter:

)

)

)

Debtor(s) )

Karoline Esho

16-30744

13

Eastern Division

Honorable LaShonda Hunt

ORDER MODIFYING THE PLAN POST CONFIRMATION

THIS MATTER coming to be heard on the DEBTOR'S MOTION TO MODIFY, the Court

having jurisdiction, with due notice having been given to all parties in interest, the Court orders as

follows:

 IT IS SO ORDERED:

 1. The Debtor is allowed to keep all of the 2016 tax refund and the turnover requirement for 2016 is

waived.

Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt

Enter:

Dated: September 18, 2017 United States Bankruptcy Judge

David H. Cutler, esq.

Cutler & Associates, Ltd.

4131 Main Street

Skokie, IL 60076

Phone: (847) 673-8600

Prepared by:

Case 16-30744 Doc 33 Filed 09/18/17 Entered 09/19/17 09:41:49 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
#### § 504.5 Nuisances.

The use of loud, abusive, or otherwise improper language; unwarranted loitering, sleeping or assembly; the creation of any hazard to persons or things; improper disposal of rubbish; spitting, prurient prying; the commission of any obscene or indecent act, or any other unseemly or disorderly conduct on the premises; throwing articles of any kind from or within a building; or climbing upon any part of a building is prohibited.
§ 905.735-301 General standards of conduct. ( a ) Special Government employees of the Corporation shall adhere to applicable regulations adopted under § 904.735-102, except 5 CFR 735.203(b). In addition, the standards of conduct set forth in §§ 905.735-201, 905.735-204, and 905.735-205 shall apply to special Government employees.
( b ) Special Government employees of the Corporation may teach, lecture, or write consistent with the provisions of 5 CFR 735.203(c).
( c ) Pursuant to 5 CFR 735.305(b), the provisions concerning gifts, entertainment, and favors set forth in § 905.735-202 are hereby made applicable to special Government employees.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 2, 2021

No. 04-21-00334-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF L.J.C., X.I.C., Z.S.C., E.A.C., L.C.C., AND A.R.G.

From the 407th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020PA00922

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

This is an accelerated appeal of an order terminating the appellant’s parental rights, 

which must be disposed of by this Court within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal is filed. 

TEX. R. JUD. ADMIN. 6.2. The reporter’s record was due August 20, 2021, and the appellant is 

presumed indigent.

Court reporter Elva G. Chapa has filed a notification of late reporter’s record, requesting 

an extension until September 13, 2021 to file the reporter’s record. We GRANT her request and 

ORDER her to file the reporter’s record on or before September 13, 2021. 

Court reporter Blanca Espericueta has also filed a notification of late reporter’s record, 

requesting an extension to September 7, 2021. We GRANT her request and ORDER her to file 

the reporter’s record on or before September 7, 2021.

Given the time constraints governing the disposition of this appeal, further requests for 

extensions of time will be disfavored.

_________________________________

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 2nd day of September, 2021.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

FILE COPY