alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 51.78 Will a concession contract require a franchise fee and will the franchise fee be subject to adjustment? ( a ) Concession contracts will provide for payment to the government of a franchise fee or other monetary consideration as determined by the Director upon consideration of the probable value to the concessioner of the privileges granted by the contract involved. This probable value will be based upon a reasonable opportunity for net profit in relation to capital invested, including any funds required to be placed in special accounts identified in § 51.81, and the obligations of the contract as described in the prospectus.
( b ) Each prospectus shall include one of the following: ( 1 ) A proposed franchise fee based on the probable value determination in the prospectus (“prospectus franchise fee”). The prospectus franchise fee should be set at a level to encourage competition for the concession opportunity through offers of either: ( i ) Higher franchise fees; or
( ii ) Lower franchise fees in combination with enhanced or higher quality service offerings that exceed prospectus requirements.
( 2 ) Alternatively, when the Director determines that using a prospectus franchise fee is inappropriate for the particular concession opportunity, a minimum acceptable franchise fee based on the probable value determination and set at a level to encourage competition.
( c ) In determining the minimum acceptable franchise fee or prospectus franchise fee to include in a prospectus, the Director shall use relevant industry data for similar operations (*e.g.,* hospitality, recreation) and provide in the prospectus the basis for the determination of the minimum acceptable franchise fee or prospectus franchise fee. Consideration of revenue to the United States shall be subordinate to the objectives of protecting and preserving park areas and of providing necessary and appropriate services for public use and enjoyment of the park area in which they are located at reasonable rates.
( d ) The franchise fee contained in a concession contract with a term of 5 years or less may not be adjusted during the term of the contract. Concession contracts with a term of more than 5 years will contain a provision that provides for adjustment of the contract's established franchise fee at the request of the concessioner or the Director. An adjustment will occur if the concessioner and the Director mutually determine that extraordinary, unanticipated changes occurred after the effective date of the contract that have affected or will significantly affect the probable value of the privileges granted by the contract. The concession contract will provide for arbitration if the Director and a concessioner cannot agree upon an appropriate adjustment to the franchise fee that reflects the extraordinary, unanticipated changes determined by the concessioner and the Director.
[88 FR 90119, Dec. 29, 2023]
## EP A Heavy- Dut

y Engine Test Cell HD01 **GE DC Engine Dynamometer**  General E lectric D C dynamometer : (600 HP, 2000/5500 RPM)  Rotational Inertia: 21 kg- m2  Power: 600 HP (at 2000 rpm = base speed)  Torque: ~1600 ft - lb absorbing, ~1500 ft - lb motoring, up to base speed  Speed Range: 0 – 5500 rpm  Adapter: Spicer Companion Flange 5 - 1 - 6271  Controller Update Rate: 100 Hz  Data Acquisition Rate: 10 Hz
~ruatr nf tqr luitr~ ~tatrs NINETIETH CONGRESS 

FIRST SESSION-Began January 10, 1967 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Prepared und e1· the direction of FRANCIS R. V ALEO, Secretary of the Senate 

By GERALD A. HACKETT, Executive Clerk 

Wednesday, August 30, 1967 

PENDING EXECUTIVE BUSINESS 

Pending when the Senate recessed on Tuesday, August 29, 1967, was the nomination of Thurgood Marshall, 

of New York, to be an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States. 

UNANIMOUS-CONSENT AGREEMENT 

Ordered, That the Senate proceed to vote on the resolution of ratification of Ex. P (89th Cong., 2d sess.)• 

the Treaty of Amity and Economic Relations W1th Thailand, at 2 o'clock p.m. on Monday, Sept. 11, 1967. 

(Aug. 28, 1967) 

TREATY 

Date or Calendar Treaty No. SubJect Action of committee report No. 

1967 

Aug. 26 20 Ex. P (89th Cong., Treaty of Amity and Economic Relations Reported favorably by 

2d sess.). With Thailand. Mr. Fulbright, from 

the Committee on 

Foreign Relations, 

with a printed report. 

(See Ex. Rept. No. 14, 

90th Cong., 1st sess.) 

NOMINATIONS 

Date of Calendar Message Name of nominee Office Predecessor 

report No. No. 

SUPREME COURT OF 

THE UNITED STATES 

1967 

Aug. 21 977 248 Thurgood Marshall, of An Associate Justice of the [Reported favorably 

New York. Supreme Court of the by Mr. Hart, from 

United States. the Committee on 

the Judiciary, with 

minority views. 

(See Ex. Rept. No. 

13, 90th Cong., lst 

sess.)] 

85-022-67-No. 86 
llnt~ or rnlent! 1r 1 ~r e<sage 1

.~port Ko i No 1 

----- ---- ----~ 

1.'111/ 

Au~. 2\J ll.'i 1 I 

I 

324 1 

Nnme ofnommee-

(NEW REPORT) 

DEPARTMENT OF 

COMMERCE 

.Toseph W. B!l.rtlett, of 

;vr.,~~:tchusett'l. 

2 

Olllce 

General Counsel of the Department of Commerce. 

Predecessor 

Robert E. Giles, 

resigned. 

--------------~----------------~------------

U S GOVERNMENT PRUiTING OFFICE 1167
United Airlines – Flight Operations – WHQFO - 233 S. Wacker Drive, Floor 23 - Chicago, IL 60606

March 14, 2014

U.S Department of Transportation 

Federal Aviation Administration

Attn: Rules Docket, AGC-10

Office of the Chief Counsel

800 Independence Avenue, SW

Washington, DC 20591

Subject: Exemption 6783G from 14 CFR (FAR Section) – 121.434(c)(1)(ii) Regulatory 

Docket No. FAA-2002-11756 - Request for extension 

Dear Sir or Madam,

In accordance with the provisions of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) §11.63 

and §11.81, United Airlines, Inc. (United) (Certificate # CALA014A) petitions for an 

extension of Exemption No. 6783G as amended, from June 30, 2014 to June 30, 

2016. 

Exemption 6783G, as amended, exempts United from the provisions of 14 CFR 

§121.434(c)(1)(ii), which requires that if the certificate holder's approved training 

program includes a course of training in an airplane simulator under 14 CFR 

§121.409(c) and a qualifying PIC is completing initial or upgrade training specified in 

14 CFR §121.424, the PIC must be observed in the performance of the prescribed 

duties by an FAA inspector during at least one flight leg that includes a takeoff and 

landing. 

United petitions the Administrator for an extension of the termination date of 

Exemption 6783G, as amended. A summary of the original petition was published in 

the Federal Register in June, 1998. No precedents will be set by granting the 

requested relief. Therefore, United requests that the publication and comment period 

be waived.

Thank you for your consideration of this petition. Please advise if any further 

information is required for your review.

Sincerely,

Ellen Birmingham

Sr. Manager Flight Operations Regulatory Compliance

(872) 825-5193

ellen.birmingham@united.com
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Tasker Capital Corp. (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert
      P. Appleby, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1) The
      Report
      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company as of and for
      the periods presented in the Report.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





November
              14, 2005
            By:
            /s/ Robert
              P. ApplebyRobert
                P. Appleby
              Chief Executive
                Officer
Date of 

report 

1970 

Dec 8 

Date o! 

teport 

1970 

Dee q 

~:ruut:r nf t4t luitth ~tutrs NINETY-FIRST CONGRESS 

F S {Convened January 3, 1969 

IRST ESSION AdJourned December 23, 1969 

S S { Convened January 19, 1970 

ECOND ESSION 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Prepared under the direction of FRANCIS R. V ALEO, Secretary of the Senate 

By GERALD A HACKETT, Executive Clerk 

Thursday, December 10, 1970 

TREATY 

Calendar 

No 

Treaty No SubJect Action of committee 

11 Ex 0 (8ht Cong , InternatiOnal Conventwn on the PreventiOn Reported favorably WJth 

}<;t "e"") and Pum'lhmPnt of th<' CrimP of Gmo- 3 under::.tandmg'> and 

c1de 1 df'claratwn by Mr 

Church, from the Comnuttee on Formg,n ReJat!On'>, With a prmted 

report together With 

IndiVIdual VIeW'> (SN' 

nx R< pt <Jl-2) ) 

NOMINATION 

Ca!endat Message Name of nommoo Office Predecessor 

No No 

DEPARTMENT OF 

HEALTH, EDUCATION, 

AND WELFARE 

226 299 S1dney P Marland, Jr , Commi'J'liOner of EducatiOn Jame~ E Allen, J1 

of New York 

48-022-70-No 238 

US GOVERNMENT PRIUTING OFFICE 1570
# PAC Table 6a

&"Arial,Bold"&10&KFF0000This table was generated on 8/25/20.
No. 5097.

#### B. F. Davis *v.*The State.

1. Reinstatement oe Appeal—Practice in this Court.—At the last term of this court the appeal in this case was dismissed because the record failed to show notice of appeal in the court below. The *certiorari*to perfect the record, subsequently awarded, discloses that, in fact, notice of appeal was given in the court below. *Held,*sufficient to reinstate the appeal in this court.

2. Pleading—Indictment.—When a statute makes it an offense to do one *or*another of several things, the several things may be charged together, but bis must be done conjunctively, using *and*instead of the word *or*
      *638used in the statute. If the word *or*be used in such case, it renders the indictment uncertain. The indictment in this case charging that the pistol was carried “on *or*about the person," etc., is substantially defective.

Appeal from the County Court of Runnels. Tried below before the Hon. C. H. Willingham, County Judge.

The opinion states the nature of the case. The penalty assessed was a fine of twenty-five dollars.

*G. 0.*Harris,' for the appellant.

*w. L.*Davidson, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Willson, Judge.

At the last term of this court at this place, this appeal was dismissed because the record failed to show that notice of appeal had been given, and entered upon the minutes of the court below. Appellant, thereafter, at the same term, filed a motion to reinstate the cause, alleging that notice of appeal had in fact been given and entered, and praying for a certiorari to perfect the record. His motion for certiorari was granted, and his motion for rehearing was continued to the present term. In response to the certiorari, a perfected record has been filed, which shows that notice of appeal was given, and was duly entered upon the minutes of the court below; wherefore the judgment dismissing the appeal is set aside, and the cause is reinstated upon the docket, and we will now dispose of it upon its merits.

It is alleged in the indictment that appellant “did unlawfully carry on *or*about his person a pistol.” His counsel insist that the disjunctive allegation is bad; that it renders the indictment uncertain; that, instead of the word *or,*the word *and*should have been used; and upon this supposed defect a motion in arrest of judgment was mhde which was overruled. We are of the opinion that the indictment, in the particular named, is substantially defective, and that the court erred in overruling the motion in arrest of judgment.

When a statute makes it an offense to do one *or*another of several things, the several things may be charged together, but this must be done conjunctively, using *and*instead of the word *or*used in the statute. If the word *or*be used in such case, it renders the indictment uncertain. (Phillips v. The State. 39 *639Texas, 226; Lancaster v. The State, 43 Texas, 519; Hart v. The State, 2 Texas Ct. App., 39; Tompkins v. The State, 4 Id., 161; Berliner v. The State, 6 Id., 181.)

Opinion delivered June 18, 1887.

Because the indictment is defective in substance, the judgment is reversed and the prosecution is dismissed.

*Beversed and dismissed.*
§ 1159.12 Will the Endowment charge me fees to locate, review, or copy records? ( a ) The Endowment shall charge no fees for search time or for any other time expended by the Endowment to review a record. However, the Endowment may charge fees where you request that a copy be made of a record to which you have been granted access. Where a copy of the record must be made in order to provide access to the record (*e.g.,* computer printout where no screen reading is available), the copy will be made available to you without cost.
( b ) Copies of records made by photocopy or similar process will be charged to you at the rate of $0.10 per page. Where records are not susceptible to photocopying (*e.g.,* punch cards, magnetic tapes, or oversize materials), you will be charged actual cost as determined on a case-by-case basis. A copying fee totaling $3.00 or less shall be waived, but the copying fees for contemporaneous requests by the same individual shall be aggregated to determine the total fee.
( c ) Special and additional services provided at your request, such as certification or authentication, postal insurance, and special mailing arrangement costs, will be charged to you.
( d ) A copying fee shall not be charged or, alternatively, it may be reduced, when the General Counsel determines, based on a petition, that the petitioning individual is indigent and that the Endowment's resources permit a waiver of all or part of the fee.
( e ) All fees shall be paid before any copying request is undertaken. Payments shall be made by check or money order payable to the “National Endowment for the Arts.”
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 5582 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 5582

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the biodiesel 
             fuels credit and the biodiesel mixture credit.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            December 18 (legislative day, December 16), 2024

Mr. Tillis (for himself, Mr. Ricketts, Mr. Grassley, Mrs. Fischer, and 
  Ms. Ernst) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the biodiesel 
             fuels credit and the biodiesel mixture credit.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Biodiesel Tax Credit Extension Act 
of 2024''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF BIODIESEL AND RENEWABLE DIESEL CREDIT AND 
              BIODIESEL MIXTURE CREDIT.

    (a) Extension of Biodiesel and Renewable Diesel Credit.--
            (1) In general.--Section 40A(g) of the Internal Revenue 
        Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``2024'' and inserting 
        ``2025''.
            (2) Denial of double benefit.--Section 40A of such Code is 
        amended--
                    (A) by redesignating subsection (g) (as amended by 
                paragraph (1)) as subsection (h), and
                    (B) by inserting after subsection (f) the following 
                new subsection:
    ``(g) Denial of Double Benefit.--In the case of any fuel with 
respect to which a credit is allowed under section 45Z(a) for any 
taxable year, the amount determined under this section with respect to 
such fuel shall be zero.''.
    (b) Extension of Biodiesel Mixture Credit.--
            (1) Extension of credit for fuels used for taxable 
        purposes.--
                    (A) In general.--Section 6426(c)(6) of the Internal 
                Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``2024'' 
                and inserting ``2025''.
                    (B) Denial of double benefit.--Section 6426(c) of 
                such Code is amended by adding at the end the following 
                new paragraph:
            ``(7) Denial of double benefit.--In the case of any fuel 
        with respect to which a credit is allowed under section 45Z(a) 
        for any taxable year, the applicable amount determined under 
        this paragraph (2) with respect to such fuel shall be zero.''.
            (2) Extension of credit for fuels not used for taxable 
        purposes.--Section 6427(e)(6)(B) of such Code is amended by 
        striking ``2024'' and inserting ``2025''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to fuel sold or used after December 31, 2024.
                                 <all>
```
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AP RIL 7, 2017

NO. 03

- 01

- 00300

- CV

Kenneth W. Eilers, Appellant

v.

Central Texas Bank, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 155TH DISTRICT COURT OF FAYETTE COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES FIELD AND B OURLAND

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE FIELD

This is an appeal from the jud gment signed by the tr i a l court . Having reviewed the record , the

Court holds that appellant has not prosecuted his appeal and did not comply with a notice from

the Clerk of this Court. Therefore, the Court dismisses the appeal for w ant of prosecution.

A p pellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and the court below.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATIONS OF JOSEPH R. ROZELLE, PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER, PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Dragon Acquisition Corporation (the Company) for the period ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, the undersigned officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  January 9, 2009

| |                                
| | -------------------------------
| | /s/ Joseph R. Rozelle          
| | JOSEPH R. ROZELLE              
| | Principal Executive Officer    
| | and Principal Financial Officer





The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Report pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Report for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filings of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
§ 9.210 Has the Office of Management and Budget approved the information collection requirements? ( a ) The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has reviewed and approved the information collection requirements in 36 CFR part 9, subpart B, and assigned OMB Control Number 1024-0274. We may not conduct or sponsor and you are not required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. We use the information collected to: ( 1 ) Evaluate proposed operations;
( 2 ) Ensure that all necessary mitigation measures are employed to protect park resources and values; and
( 3 ) Ensure compliance with all applicable laws and regulations.
( b ) You may submit comments on any aspect of the information collection requirements to the Information Collection Clearance Officer, National Park Service, 12201 Sunrise Valley Drive, Room 2C114, Mail Stop 242, Reston, VA 20192.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Primus Knowledge Solutions, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ronald M. Stevens, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

/s/ Ronald M. Stevens 

 

Ronald M. Stevens 

Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer 

November 14, 2003
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

N o. 04

- 12

- 00 608

- CR

Juan Jose RAMIREZ

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 437th District Court , Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2006

- CR

- 8683

The Honorable Lori I. Valenzuela , Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE MARION

, JUSTICE BARNARD, AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the motion to withdraw is

GRANTED, and the trial court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

SIGNED May 15, 2013.

_____________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice
# CongressionalCandidate 8a

&"Arial,Bold"&10&KFF0000This table was generated on 5/11/20.