alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

November 29, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

131757 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

NAHZY BUCK,

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 131757 

 COA: 259347 

Ingham CC: 02-000541-CZ

THOMAS M. COOLEY LAW SCHOOL, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 20, 2006 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

CAVANAGH, J., not participating. 

t1120 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 29, 2006 

 Clerk
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. § 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§ 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Private Media Group, Inc. (the Company) for the quarterly period ending June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Berth Milton,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Johan Gillborg, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Berth Milton       
|Berth Milton           
|Chief Executive Officer
|                       
|August 15, 2011        
|                       
|/s/ Johan Gillborg     
|Johan Gillborg         
|Chief Financial Officer
|                       
|August 15, 2011        

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except
to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
§ 223.101 Determination of purchaser responsibility. ( a ) A Contracting Officer shall not award a timber sale contract unless that officer makes an affirmative determination of purchaser responsibility. In the absence of information clearly indicating that the prospective purchaser is responsible, the Contracting Officer shall conclude that the prospective purchaser does not qualify as a responsible purchaser.
( b ) To determine a purchaser to be responsible, a Contracting Officer must find that: ( 1 ) The purchaser has adequate financial resources to perform the contract or the ability to obtain them;
( 2 ) The purchaser is able to perform the contract within the contract term taking into consideration all existing commercial and governmental business commitments;
( 3 ) The purchaser has a satisfactory performance record on timber sale contracts. A prospective purchaser that is or recently has been seriously deficient in contract performance shall be presumed not to be responsible, unless the Contracting Officer determines that the circumstances were beyond the purchaser's control and were not created through improper actions by the purchaser or affiliate, or that the purchaser has taken appropriate corrective action. Past failure to apply sufficient tenacity and perseverance to perform acceptably under a contract is strong evidence that a purchaser is not a responsible contractor. The Contracting Officer shall consider the number of contracts involved and extent of deficiency of each in making this evaluation;
( 4 ) The purchaser has a satisfactory record of integrity and business ethics;
( 5 ) The purchaser has or is able to obtain equipment and supplies suitable for logging the timber and for meeting the resource protection provisions of the contract;
( 6 ) The purchaser is otherwise qualified and eligible to receive an award under applicable laws and regulations.
( c ) If the prospective purchaser is a small business concern and the Contracting Officer determines that the purchaser does not qualify as a responsible purchaser on an otherwise acceptable bid, the Contracting Officer shall refer the matter to the Small Business Administration which will decide whether or not to issue a Certificate of Competency.
( d ) Affiliated concerns, as defined in § 223.49(a)(5) of this subpart are normally considered separate entities in determining whether the concern that is to perform the contract meets the applicable standards for responsibility. However, the Contracting Officer shall consider an affiliate's past performance and integrity when they may adversely affect the prospective purchaser's responsibility.
[53 FR 33132, Aug. 30, 1988]
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:FAA-2013-0665; Dir ID 2012-NM-082-AD
Case 16-25481 Doc 5 Filed 08/09/16 Entered 08/09/16 09:39:08 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2
Case 16-25481 Doc 5 Filed 08/09/16 Entered 08/09/16 09:39:08 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2