alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 241.21 Definitions. For the purpose of this subpart, the terms listed in this section shall be defined as follows: *ANILCA* refers to the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act (16 U.S.C. 3101 *et seq.*)
*Federal lands* mean lands the title to which is in the United States, but does not include those lands: ( 1 ) Tentatively approved, legislatively conveyed, or patented to the State of Alaska, or
( 2 ) interim-conveyed or patented to a Native corporation or person.
*Fish and Wildlife* means any member of the animal kingdom, including without limitation any mammal, fish, bird, amphibian, reptile, mollusk, crustacean, arthropod, or other invertebrate, and includes any part, product, egg, or offspring thereof, or dead body or part thereof. For the purposes of this subpart, birds also include any migratory or endangered bird for which protection is afforded by treaty or other international agreement.
*Land* means lands, waters, and interests therein.
*Multiple-use activity* is a specific management or permitted activity, use, measure, course of action, or treatment of National Forest System lands carried out under the statutory charter of the Multiple-Use Sustained-Yield Act of 1960 (16 U.S.C. 528 *et seq.*) and the National Forest Management Act (16 U.S.C. 1600 *et seq.*).
*Responsible Forest Officer* is the Forest Service employee who has the authority to select, authorize, permit and/or carry out a specific multiple-use activity.
#### George A. L’Hommedieu et al., Appellants, *v.*Robert D. Winthrop, Respondent.

(Submitted March 14, 1907;

decided April *2,*1907.)

*L’Hommedieu*v. *Winthrop,*97 App. Div. 687, affirmed.

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered October 14, 1904, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a verdict directed by the court in an action to recover a balance alleged to be due on a building contract.

*Harrison 8. Moore*and *Clinton E. Smith*for appellants.

*Henry W. Taft*for respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur : Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Vann, Werner, Hiscock and Chase, JJ. 'Not sitting: Willard Bartlett, J.
| 1.   | The                        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)                        or 15(d) of                        the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2.   | The                        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all                        material                        respects, the financial condition and results of operations                        of the                        Company. |
|----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:                        May 18, 2007 |   | /s/                        Steven van der Velden               |
|--------------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                       |   | Steven                        van der Velden                   |
|                                       |   | President                        & Chief Executive Officer |
|                                       |   |                                                           |
|                                       |   |                                                           |
| Dated:                        May 18, 2007 |   | /s/                        Willem Ackermans                    |
|                                       |   | Willem                        Ackermans                        |
|                                       |   | Chief                        Financial Officer                 |
#### § 520.10 Placards, signs, banners, and flags.

The displaying or carrying of placards, signs, banners, or flags is prohibited unless officially authorized.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6876

RANDY RHYNE, Petitioner - Appellant,

v. WARDEN, TYGER RIVER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (4:07-cv-03147-HMH)

Submitted: October 29, 2008 Decided: November 17, 2008

Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Randy Rhyne, Appellant Pro Se. Melody Jane Brown, Assistant Attorney General, Donald John Zelenka, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.PER CURIAM: Randy Rhyne seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable.

Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v.

McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Rhyne has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We also deny Rhyne’s motions for a transcript, for appointment of counsel, and to appoint an investigator. We dispense with oral argument because the facts

23 and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

I, TSAN-KUN WU, President and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive
officer) of EUPA International Corporation, Inc. (the "Registrant"), certifies
that to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2003 of the Registrant (the "Report"):

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.

/s/   Tsan-Kun Wu
-------------------------
Name: Tsan-Kun Wu
Date: April 7, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          16,682
<SECURITIES>                                    24,694
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,247
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (870)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                54,449
<PP&E>                                           7,831
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (4,209)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  58,406
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,604
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           445
<OTHER-SE>                                      42,357
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    58,406
<SALES>                                         23,519
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                23,519
<CGS>                                            5,700
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   27,009
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,365
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 101
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,825)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        82
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,907)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.45)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.45)


</TABLE>
§ 13.116 Permittee's interest. ( a ) A permittee shall not accrue a compensable interest in a cabin or other structure in a park area unless specifically authorized by Federal statutory law.
( b ) A cabin or other structure in a park area may not be sold, bartered, exchanged, assigned or included as a portion of any sale or exchange of other property by a permittee unless specifically authorized by Federal statutory law.
( c ) The Superintendent shall determine the extent and nature of a permittee's possessory interest at the time a permit is issued or denied.
*

The opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 46(d) (2000).

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-4789

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

RICARDO SANCHEZ,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern

District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Charles H. Haden II,

District Judge. (CR-02-213)

Submitted: February 19, 2004 Decided: February 25, 2004

Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.*

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David O. Schles, STOWERS & ASSOCIATES, Charleston, West Virginia,

for Appellant. Kasey Warner, United States Attorney, R. Booth

Goodwin II, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West

Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Ricardo Sanchez entered a guilty plea to membership in a

conspiracy to steal goods moving as an interstate shipment of

freight, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371 (2000). He was sentenced

to thirty-seven months incarceration, three years of supervised

release, and a $100 special assessment. Sanchez appeals. 

On appeal, Sanchez argues he had a minimal or minor role

in the conspiracy, and at sentencing the district court should,

therefore, have reduced his offense level under U.S. Sentencing

Guidelines Manual § 3B1.2 (2003). We review the district court’s

factual determinations for clear error and its legal determinations

de novo. United States v. Akinkoye, 185 F.3d 192, 201 (4th Cir.

1999). Sanchez’s claim is meritless. Sanchez fails to establish

he was a minimal or minor participant in the conspiracy. USSG

§ 3B1.2. 

Accordingly, we affirm Sanchez’s conviction and sentence.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid in the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
§ 327.23 Recreation use fees. ( a ) In accordance with the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act of 1965 (16 U.S.C. 460l) and the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993, Pub. L. 103-66, the Corps of Engineers collects day use fees, special recreation use fees and/or special permit fees for the use of specialized sites, facilities, equipment or services related to outdoor recreation furnished at Federal expense.
( b ) Where such fees are charged, the District Commander shall insure that clear notice of fee requirements is prominently posted at each area, and at appropriate locations therein and that the notice be included in publications distributed at such areas. Failure to pay authorized recreation use fees as established pursuant to Pub. L. 88-578, 78 Stat. 897, as amended (16 U.S.C. 460l-6a), is prohibited and is punishable by a fine of not more than $100.
( c ) Failure to pay authorized day use fees, and/or properly display applicable receipt, permit or pass is prohibited.
( d ) Any Golden Age or Golden Access Passport permittee shall be entitled, upon presentation of such a permit, to utilize special recreation facilities at a rate of 50 percent off the established use fee at Federally operated areas. Fraudulent use of a Golden Age or Golden Access Passport is prohibited.
[65 FR 6903, Feb. 11, 2000]
EXHIBIT 99.2
                                  ------------


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES - OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the quarterly report of Ceristar, (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2002, G. Earl Demorest, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

         1.   The quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of
              Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.   The information contained in the quarterly report fairly presents,
              in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company.


          May 20, 2003                            /s/G. Earl Demorest
          ------------                            --------------------
             (Date)                               G. Earl Demorest
                                                  Vice President of Engineering
                                                  and Finance and Chief
                                                  Financial Officer
#### § 910.69 Structural bay.

*Structural bay* means the distance or span from one vertical structural member fronting on a street to the immediately adjacent vertical structural member fronting on the same street.
****U.S.        Department of Justice · Office of Justice Programs****Bureau of Justice Statistics**
**BJS home page**
**What's         new**
Relevant topics:Criminal record systems NCHIPImproving Criminal History Records for Background Checks, 2005
Describes the achievements of the National Criminal History Improvement Program (NCHIP), its authorizing legislation, and program history.  This program report summarizes NCHIP-funded criminal record improvement efforts, including improved accessibility of records, full participation in the Interstate Identification Index, the automation of records and fingerprint data, and improvements in the National Instant Criminal Background Check, National Sex Offender Registry, and domestic violence and protection order systems.  The report provides examples of projects aimed at enhancing the involvement of the courts and system integration in improving disposition reporting.  The report also discusses the Bureau of Justice Statistics� efforts to improve performance measurement including the development and use of a Records Quality Index.

     Highlights include the following:- At the end of 2003, States held approximately 71 million criminal records on individuals.
- As of December 2005, 48 States belonged to the Interstate Identification Index (III), meeting the FBI�s rigorousstandards for participation.
- The National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) supports nearly 8 million checks annually at the presale stage of firearms purchases.

07/06  NCJ  211485

                This publication is one in a series. More recent editions may be available.         To view a list of all in the series go to the **publications        page**. 

**Acrobat file** (257K) |     **ASCII file** (26K) | **Spreadsheets** (zip format 34K)  
**About         the source data** | ****To order paper version****

 Help for using BJS products
**BJS home page      | Top of this page**
Bureau of Justice Statistics        www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/Send comments to[email protected]
 
OJP Freedom of Information Act pagePrivacy Policy		Page last revised on *July 21, 2006*

**
CERTIFICATION
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiary, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;
 (b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;
 (c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and
 (d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and
 (b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Thomas R. Johnson

Thomas R. JohnsonChief Executive Office andChief Financial Officer
 23
EXHIBIT 31.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY-ACT OF 2002



I, Rick Ivanovick, Chief Financial Officer of RecycleNet and subsidiaries, certify that:



1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB of RecycleNet and subsidiaries.



2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.The small business issuers other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and



5.The small business issuers other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.



|April 22, 2005 | /s/ Rick Ivanovick     
|-------------- | -----------------------
|               | Rick Ivanovick         
|               | Chief Financial Officer
#### § 1149.67 Who represents the NEA on an appeal?

The authority head will designate the NEA's representative in the event of an appeal.