alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Price v. Price, appellant.

*Defense*— *in action to annul*marriage— *allegations in answer*— *materiality of*

In an action to annul a marriage between plaintiff and defendant, upon the ground that plaintiff had been previously married, and his wife was living *660at the time of his marriage with defendant, but had not been heard from by him, for more than five years; *held,*that it was no defense that defendant was induced to marry plaintiff by his representations that he had the legal right to contract marriage.

It is a proper matter of defense that the former wife was not living at the time of the bringing of the action.

An allegation in the answer that defendant “ has not knowledge or informa, tion sufficient to form a belief whether S. (the first wife) was living at the commencement of this action,” *held,*a material allegation to join issue upon plaintiff’s statement that " she is still living.”

In the complaint, it was alleged that defendant had knowledge and information of the fact that plaintiff’s former wife was living. *Held,*that a denial in the answer of this allegation, though not a perfect defense, was material, and might be necessary, upon the question of costs and alimony.

*John L. Hill,*for appellant.

*Stephen Brown,*for respondent.

P. Potter, J.

Appeal from an order of special term, striking out part of the answer. The material points passed upon in the opinion are stated in the head note, and it is not believed necessary to publish the opinion in full.

*Order modified.*
§ 51.83 Sale of Native Handicrafts. ( a ) Where authorized by an applicable concession contract, concessioners are encouraged to sell authentic native handicrafts appropriately labeled or denoted as authentic that reflect the cultural, historical, and geographic characteristics of the related park area. To further this objective, concession contracts will contain a provision that exempts the revenue of a concessioner derived from the sale of appropriately labeled or denoted authentic native handicrafts from the concession contract's franchise fee.
( b ) The sale of products as authentic native handicrafts is further regulated under the Indian Arts and Crafts Act, Public Law 101-644, as amended.
( c ) *Definitions.* ( 1 ) *Alaska Native* means any citizen of the United States who is a person of one-fourth degree or more Alaskan Indian (including Tsimshian Indians not enrolled in the Metalakatla Indian Community), Eskimo, or Aleut blood, or combination thereof. The term includes any person so defined either or both of whose adoptive parents are not Alaska Natives. It also includes, in the absence of a minimum blood quantum, any citizen of the United States who is regarded as an Alaska Native by the Alaska native village or native groups of which he or she claims to be a member and whose father or mother is (or, if deceased, was) regarded as an Alaska Native by any village or group.
( 2 ) *Arts and crafts objects* means art works and crafts that are in a traditional or non-traditional style or medium.
( 3 ) *Authentic native handicrafts* means arts and crafts objects created by a United States Indian, Alaska Native, Native Samoan or Native Hawaiian that are made with the help of only such devices as allow the manual skill of the maker to condition the shape and design of each individual object.
( 4 ) *Native Hawaiian* means any individual who is a descendant of the aboriginal people that, prior to 1778, occupied and exercised sovereignty in the area that now constitutes the State of Hawaii.
( 5 ) *United States Indian* means any individual that is a member of an Indian tribe as defined in 18 U.S.C. 1159(c)(3).
[72 FR 32190, June 12, 2007]
This table was generated on 9/7/23.

Rank ID # Committee Amount

1 C00401224 ACTBLUE $320,451,346

2 C00694323 WINRED $183,659,380

3 C00687103 AMERICANS FOR PROSPERITY ACTION, INC. (AFP ACTION) DBA CVA ACTION AND DBA LIBRE $77,842,718

4 C00836353 NEWSOM FOR CALIFORNIA GOVERNOR 2022 $23,240,059

5 C00495028 HMP $20,773,009

6 C00840546 TRUST IN THE MISSION PAC $19,340,497

7 C00504530 CONGRESSIONAL LEADERSHIP FUND $19,102,817

8 C00828061 SFA FUND, INC $18,696,847

9 C00492140 AB PAC $10,432,686

10 C00341396 MOVEON.ORG POLITICAL ACTION $10,327,395

11 C00821439 AMERICAN VALUES 2024 $9,796,391

12 C00580068 PROGRESSIVE TURNOUT PROJECT $6,282,902

13 C00606962 WFP NATIONAL PAC $3,970,263

14 C00603084 NATIONAL DEMOCRATIC TRAINING COMMITTEE PAC $3,727,249

15 C00725820 THE LINCOLN PROJECT $3,633,640

16 C00540443 GIFFORDS PAC $3,203,335

17 C00770214 CHAMPION AMERICAN VALUES $2,424,824

18 C00654053 THE PAC FOR AMERICA'S FUTURE $2,303,989

19 C00632133 SWING LEFT $2,208,987

20 C00633404 STOP REPUBLICANS $2,193,577

21 C00418897 VOTEVETS $2,029,673

22 C00815928 READY TO WIN $1,850,083

23 C00731042 POWERED BY PEOPLE $1,838,613

24 C00693515 FAIR FIGHT $1,827,308

25 C00678839 INDIVISIBLE ACTION $1,616,551

26 C00789966 FORWARD PARTY $1,608,067

27 C00633248 314 ACTION FUND $1,483,191

28 C00812495 STATE DEMOCRACY DEFENDERS PAC $1,462,645

29 C00728360 MOVEMENT VOTER PAC $1,417,183

30 C00698936 WFW ACTION FUND, INC. $1,362,008

31 C00745786 DEMOCRATIC STRATEGY INSTITUTE $1,316,612

32 C00748228 MARCH ON PAC $1,137,061

33 C00677773 UNITE AMERICA PAC INC. $1,067,833

34 C00495861 PRIORITIES USA ACTION $1,001,804

35 C00636027 TECH FOR CAMPAIGNS $949,799

36 C00010322 AMERICAN POSTAL WORKERS UNION COMMITTEE ON POLITICAL ACTION $907,264

37 C00630665 JUSTICE DEMOCRATS PAC $844,424

38 C00764233 DEFEND THE VOTE $820,432

39 C00685719 DLGA PAC $797,568

40 C00710848 DMFI PAC $747,589

41 C00764860 THE 1776 PROJECT POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $734,724

42 C00707091 GRASSROOTS DEMOCRATS HQ $727,305

43 C00838805 COMMON SENSE $711,284

44 C00753558 DEMOCRATIC VICTORY PAC, INC. $708,248

45 C00692319 VPP $707,810

46 C00693531 FUTURE LEADERS FUND $660,839

47 C00682211 COMMON POWER $651,268

48 C00542431 JOHN BOLTON PAC $650,610

49 C00760827 DEMAND JUSTICE PAC $628,114

50 C00806893 JANE FONDA CLIMATE PAC $621,094

PAC Table 13a

Top 50 Committees with Non-Contribution Accounts (Hybrid PACs) by Receipts

January 1 - June 30, 2023
§ 1158.300 Professional and technical services. ( a ) The prohibition on the use of appropriated funds, in § 1158.100 (a), does not apply in the case of any reasonable payment to a person, other than an officer or employee of a person requesting or receiving a covered Federal action, if the payment is for professional or technical services rendered directly in the preparation, submission, or negotiation of any bid, proposal, or application for that Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement or for meeting requirements imposed by or pursuant to law as a condition for receiving that Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement.
( b ) The reporting requirements in § 1158.110 (a) and (b) regarding filing a disclosure form by each person, if required, shall not apply with respect to professional or technical services rendered directly in the preparation, submission, or negotiation of any commitment providing for the United States to insure or guarantee a loan.
( c ) For purposes of paragraph (a) of this section, *professional and technical services* shall be limited to advice and analysis directly applying any professional or technical discipline. For example, drafting or a legal document accompanying a bid or proposal by a lawyer is allowable. Similarly, technical advice provided by an engineer on the performance or operational capability of a piece of equipment rendered directly in the negotiation of a contract is allowable. However, communications with the intent to influence made by a professional (such as a licensed lawyer) or a technical person (such as a licensed accountant) are not allowable under this section unless they provide advice and analysis directly applying their professional or technical expertise and unless the advice or analysis is rendered directly and solely in the preparation, submission or negotiation of a covered Federal action. Thus, for example, communications with the intent to influence made by a lawyer that do not provide legal advice or analysis directly and solely related to the legal aspects of his or her client's proposal, but generally advocate one proposal over another are not allowable under this section because the lawyer is not providing professional legal services. Similarly, communications with the intent to influence made by an engineer providing an engineering analysis prior to the preparation or submission of a bid or proposal are not allowable under this section since the engineer is providing technical services but not directly in the preparation, submission or negotiation of a covered Federal action.
( d ) Requirements imposed by or pursuant to law as a condition for receiving a covered Federal award include those required by law or regulation, or reasonably expected to be required by law or regulation, and any other requirements in the actual award documents.
( e ) Persons other than officers or employees of a person requesting or receiving a covered Federal action include consultants and trade associations.
( f ) Only those services expressly authorized by this section are allowable under this section.
Editorial Note on Part 7
Editorial Note: The Alphabetical Listing is updated annually by the Office of the Federal Register.

§ 7.52 Cedar Breaks National Monument. ( a ) *Snowmobiles.* ( 1 ) During periods when snow depth prevents regular vehicular travel in the Monument, snowmobiling will be permitted on the main Monument road and parking areas from the south boundary to the north boundary and on the Panguitch Lake road from its junction with the main Monument road east to the east park boundary. In addition, the paved walkway from the Visitor Center parking lot to the Point Supreme overlook is also open for snowmobile travel.
( 2 ) On roads designated for snowmobile use, only that portion of the road or parking area intended for other motor vehicle use may be used by snowmobile. Such roadway is available for snowmobile use only when the designated road or parking area is closed by snow depth to all other motor vehicle use by the public. These routes will be marked by signs, snow poles, or other appropriate means. The park Superintendent shall determine the opening and closing dates for use of designated snowmobile routes each year. Routes will be open to snowmobile travel when they are considered to be safe for travel but not necessarily free of safety hazards.
( 3 ) Snowmobile use outside designated routes is prohibited. This prohibition shall not apply to emergency administrative travel by employees of the National Park Service or its contractors or concessioners or law enforcement agencies.
( b ) [Reserved]
[49 FR 29375, July 20, 1984]
BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

In the Matter of )

Allen Blue

)

)

AO 2022-24

Agenda Documents No. 22-54-A and 

No. 22-54-B

CERTIFICATION

I, Vicktoria J. Allen, recording secretary of the Federal Election Commission open meeting 

on December 01, 2022 do hereby certify that the Commission took the following actions in the 

above-captioned matter: 

1. Failed by a vote of 2-4 to:

Approve Agenda Document No. 22-54-A, otherwise known as 

Draft A.

Commissioners Broussard and Weintraub voted affirmatively for the motion. 

Commissioners Cooksey, Dickerson, Lindenbaum, and Trainor dissented.

2. Decided by a vote of 4-2 to:

Approve Agenda Document No. 22-54-B, which is Draft B.

Commissioners Cooksey, Dickerson, Lindenbaum, and Trainor voted affirmatively for 

the decision. Commissioners Broussard and Weintraub dissented.

Attest:

 December 2, 2022

Date Vicktoria J. Allen

Acting Deputy Secretary of the 

Commission
SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NINETY-NINTH CONGRESS 

Convened January 3, 1985 

FIRST SESSION { 

SECOND SESSION { 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Tuesday, April 23, 1985 

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF JO-ANNE L. COE, 

SECRETARY OF THE SENATE 

By Gerald A. Hackett, Executive Clerk 
1 

NOMINATIONS 

Calendar Message Nommee, Office. And Predecessor Reported 

* 

* 

No. No. Bv 

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

100 115 John R. Norton III, of Arizona, to be Apr 4, 85 Mr. Helms, 

Deputy Secretary of i\.gnculture, vice Committee on Agriculture, 

Richard E. Lyng. resigned. Nutnuon, and Forestry, 

without printed report 

COAST GUARD 

107 88 The followmg named captam of the Coast Apr 18. 85 Mr. Danforth. 

Guard Reserve to be a permanent Commmee on Commerce, 

comm1ss10ned off 1cer m the Coast Guard Science, and 

Reserve m the grade of commodore: Transportation, without 

pnnted report. 

Captam Bennett S. Sparks. USCGR. 

*S1gmf1es nomtnee's commitment to respond to requests to appear and testify before any duly 

constituted committee of the Senate
# EUR-Lex - 12006E239 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12006E239

**Treaty establishing the European Community (consolidated version) - Part Five - Institutions of the Community - TITLE I - Provisions governing the institutions - Chapter 1 - The institutions - Section 4 - The Court of Justice - Article 239 **

*
Official Journal C 321 E , 29/12/2006 P. 0149 - 0149 Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0128 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0275 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0063 - Consolidated version (EEC Treaty - no official publication available) *

Article 239

The Court of Justice shall have jurisdiction in any dispute between Member States which relates to the subject matter of this Treaty if the dispute is submitted to it under a special agreement between the parties.

--------------------------------------------------
MUR808200074
MUR808200075
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, *v.*Philip Weinseimer, Appellant.

*People*v. *Weinseimer,*117 App. Div. 603, affirmed.

(Argued November 25, 1907;

decided December 10, 1907.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered February 15, 1907, which affirmed a judgment of the Court of General Sessions pf the city of New York rendered upon a verdict convicting the defendant of the crime of extortion.

*George Raines*and *F. A. Acker*for appellant.

*William Travers*Jerome, *District Attorney (Robert O. Taylor*of counsel), for respondent.

Judgment of conviction affirmed ; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Yann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsAn Accurate and Dynamic Computer Graphics Muscle ModelA computer based musculo-skeletal model was developed at the University in the departments of Mechanical and Biomedical Engineering. This model accurately represents human shoulder kinematics. The result of this model is the graphical display of bones moving through an appropriate range of motion based on inputs of EMGs and external forces. The need existed to incorporate a geometric muscle model in the larger musculo-skeletal model. Previous muscle models did not accurately represent muscle geometries, nor did they account for the kinematics of tendons. This thesis covers the creation of a new muscle model for use in the above musculo-skeletal model. This muscle model was based on anatomical data from the Visible Human Project (VHP) cadaver study. Two-dimensional digital images from the VHP were analyzed and reconstructed to recreate the three-dimensional muscle geometries. The recreated geometries were smoothed, reduced, and sliced to form data files defining the surfaces of each muscle. The muscle modeling function opened these files during run-time and recreated the muscle surface. The modeling function applied constant volume limitations to the muscle and constant geometry limitations to the tendons.Document ID19970037529Acquisition SourceJohnson Space CenterDocument TypeThesis/DissertationAuthorsLevine, David Asher*(Texas Univ. Austin, TX United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateAugust 1, 1997Subject CategoryComputer Programming And SoftwareReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:205923NASA/TM-97-205923Accession Number97N30974Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAG9-805Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19970037529.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### § 51.48 What happens to a right of preference in the event of termination of a concession contract for unsatisfactory performance or other breach?

Nothing in this part will limit the right of the Director to terminate a concession contract pursuant to its terms at any time for less than satisfactory performance or otherwise. If a concession contract is terminated for less than satisfactory performance or other breach, the terminated concessioner, even if otherwise qualified, will not be eligible to be a preferred offeror. The fact that the Director may not have terminated a concession contract for less than satisfactory performance or other breach will not limit the authority of the Director to determine that a concessioner did not operate satisfactorily on an overall basis during the term of a concession contract.
§ 1170.51 Assurances required. ( a ) *Assurances.* An applicant for Federal financial assistance to which this part applies shall submit an assurance, on a form specified by the responsible Endowment official, that the program or activity will be operated in compliance with this part. An applicant may incorporate these assurances by reference in subsequent applications to the Endowment.
( b ) *Duration of obligation.* ( 1 ) In the case of Federal financial assistance extended in the form of real property or to provide real property or structures on the property, the assurance will obligate the recipient or, in the case of a subsequent transfer, the transferee, for the period during which the real property or structures are used for the purpose for which Federal financial assistance is extended or for another purpose involving the provision of similar services or benefits.
( 2 ) In the case of Federal financial assistance extended to provide personal property, the assurance will obligate the recipient for the period during which it retains ownership or possession of the property.
( 3 ) In all other cases the assurance will obligate the recipient for the period during which Federal financial assistance is extended.
( c ) *Covenants.* ( 1 ) Where Federal financial assistance is provided in the form of real property or interest in the property from the Endowment, the instrument effecting or recording this transfer shall contain a covenant running with the land to assure nondiscrimination for the period during which the real property is used for a purpose for which the Federal financial assistance is extended or for another purpose involving the provision of similar services or benefits.
( 2 ) Where no transfer of property is involved but property is purchased or improved with Federal financial assistance, the recipient shall agree to include the covenant described in paragraph (b)(2) of this section in the instrument effecting or recording any subsequent transfer of the property.
( 3 ) Where Federal financial assistance is provided in the form of real property or interest in the property from the Endowment, the covenant shall also include a condition coupled with a right to be reserved by the Endowment to revert title to the property in the event of a breach of the covenant. If a transferee of real property proposes to mortgage or to otherwise encumber the real property as security for financing construction of new, or improvement of existing, facilities on the property for the purposes for which the property was transferred, the responsible Endowment official may, upon request of the transferee and if necessary to accomplish such financing and upon such conditions as he or she deems appropriate, agree to forbear the exercise of such right to revert title for so long as the lien of such mortgage or other encumbrance remains effective.
[46 FR 55897, Nov. 12, 1981, as amended at 68 FR 51386, Aug. 26, 2003]
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 23, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 05-40653

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSE FELIX RUBIO-CRUZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:04-CR-2303-ALL

--------------------

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jose Felix Rubio-Cruz appeals his conviction and sentence

for illegal reentry after a previous deportation. Rubio-Cruz

argues that the district court plainly erred by enhancing his

sentence pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii) based on a

Texas conviction for aggravated assault. Rubio-Cruz contends

that the enhancement is improper because the Texas aggravated

assault statute may be violated by conduct such as recklessness. 
No. 05-40653

-2-

As the United States Sentencing Commission has identified

aggravated assault as a “crime of violence” for purposes of 

§ 2L1.2(b)(1)(A), the district court did not commit error, plain

or otherwise, by imposing the sentence enhancement. § 2L1.2,

comment. (n.1(b)(iii)); see United States v. Izaguirre-Flores,

405 F.3d 270, 275 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 126 S. Ct. 253

(2005); see also United States v. Rayo-Valdez, 302 F.3d 314, 317

(5th Cir. 2002). 

Rubio-Cruz argues next that the “felony” and “aggravated

felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and (b)(2) are

unconstitutional on their face and as applied in his case in

light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000). RubioCruz’s constitutional challenge is foreclosed by AlmendarezTorres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998). Although

Rubio-Cruz contends that Almendarez-Torres was incorrectly

decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule

Almendarez-Torres in light of Apprendi, we have repeatedly

rejected such arguments on the basis that Almendarez-Torres

remains binding. See United States v. Garza-Lopez, 410 F.3d 268,

276 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 126 S. Ct. 298 (2005). Rubio-Cruz

properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of

Almendarez-Torres and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to

preserve it for further review. 

AFFIRMED.
§ 13.1206 Wildlife distance conditions. ( a ) Approaching a bear or any large mammal within 50 yards is prohibited.
( b ) Continuing to occupy a position within 50 yards of a bear that is using a concentrated food source, including, but not limited to, animal carcasses, spawning salmon, and other feeding areas is prohibited.
( c ) Continuing to engage in fishing within 50 yards of a bear is prohibited.
( d ) The prohibitions in this section do not apply to persons— ( 1 ) Engaged in a legal hunt;
( 2 ) On a designated bear viewing structure;
( 3 ) In compliance with a written protocol approved by the Superintendent; or
( 4 ) Who are otherwise directed by a park employee.
[71 FR 69333, Nov. 30, 2006, as amended at 73 FR 3186, Jan. 17, 2008]