alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The undersigned, Paul G. Carter, President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and a director of Novastar Resources Ltd., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Novastar Resources Ltd. for the three month period ended September 30, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Novastar Resources Ltd.

Date: November 22, 2005
| /s/ Paul G. Carter |
|--------------------|

Paul G. Carter 

President, Chief Executive Officer,

Chief Financial Officer and Director

(Principal Executive, Financial and Accounting Officer)
## COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02 - 14 - 00250 - CR

ASHLEY TURK APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

---------- FROM THE 372ND DISTR ICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

TRIAL COURT NO. 1348 736

---------- 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

- --------- On June 30, 2014, Appellant Ashley Turk , acting pro se, filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s “ Supplement/ Amendment to Conditions of Community Supervision.” On July 15, 2014, we notified Turk that it appears we lack jurisdiction over t his matter because the trial court has not entered any appealable orders. We advised Turk that this appeal could be dismissed unless

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47 .4.2

she, or any party desiring to continue this appeal, filed a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal on or befor e July 25, 2014 . Turk’s attorney filed a response, stating that he knew of no grounds for pursuing a direct appeal in this case because the trial court had not issued a final judgment. We generally have jurisdiction to consider an appeal in a criminal cas e only when there has been a judgment of conviction

. See McKown v. State , 915 S.W.2d 160, 161 (Tex. App.

— Fort Worth 1996, no pet.). This court does not have jurisdiction to consider an appeal from an order altering or modifying the
conditions of communit y supervision. See Davis v. State , 195 S.W.3d 708, 710 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006) (“There is no legislative authority for entertaining a direct appeal from an order modifying the conditions of community supervision.”);
Basaldua v. State , 558 S.W.2d 2, 5 (Tex. Crim. App. 1977). Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f).
PER CURIAM PANEL: GARDNER, WALKER, and MCCOY , JJ.
DO NOT PUBLISH Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
DELIVERED: August 25, 2014
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OFINDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We have issued our reportdated March 23, 2007, except for paragraph 3 in footnote 3 as to which thedate is March 26, 2007 (which report expresses an unqualified opinion andincludes an explanatory paragraph relating to the adoption of Statement ofFinancial Accounting Standards No. 123(R) on January 1, 2006)accompanying the consolidated financial statements included in the 2006 AnnualReport of MEDecision, Inc. and Subsidiaries on Form 10-K forthe year ended December 31, 2006. We hereby consent to the incorporationby reference of said report in the Registration Statement of MEDecision, Inc.and Subsidiaries on Form S-8 (File No. 333-139489,effective December 19, 2006).

/s/ Grant Thornton LLP

Philadelphia, PennsylvaniaMarch 26, 2007

----
Pursuant to5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 , th e court has determined that this opinionshould not * be publishe d an d is not precede nt except under the limited circu mstance s set forth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. 

### INTHE UNI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHE FIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 08- 40655 C onfer enc e Cal endar UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA P l ai n t i f f
- A pp el l ee v. J ES S I E NORBERT O GUERRA D e fe nda nt - Appe l l ant

A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f or t h e S ou t h ern D i st ri ctof T exas U SDC N o . 2 : 0 7
- CR- 3 9 7
- ALL B ef ore JO N E S , C h i ef

Ju dg e, an d JO L L Yan d E L R O D , C i rcui tJu dg es. P E R C U R I A M: * T h e att orney ap p o in te d to r e p re se n t J e ss ie N o rb e rto G u e rr a h a s m o v e d f or l e av e t o w i t hdr aw a nd has f i l e d ab r i e f

i n a c c o r da nc e w i t h A n d er s v . Ca lif o rn ia , 386 U . S . 738 ( 196 7) . G u erraha s not f i l ed a response. O u r i n dep en den trevi ew o f th e re c o r d a n d co u n s e l’ s b r ie f d is c lo s e s n o n o n fr iv o lo u s is s u e fo ra p p e a l. A c c o r d in g ly , c o u n s e l’ s m o tio n fo rle a v e to w ith d r a w is G R A N T E D , co u n s e l is e x c u s e d f

r o m f u r t h e rr e s p o n s ib i l i t i e s h e r e i n , a n d t h e AP P EA L I S DI S M I S S ED . S ee5 T H C IR . R. 42. 2. United States Court of App eals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D April 30, 2009 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I Clerk
EXHIBIT 32.2
 
 SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION
 
 Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, I, Jane Morlok, Chief Financial Officer of Breda Telephone Corp., certify that to my knowledge (i) Breda Telephone Corp.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Breda Telephone Corp.
 
 Date:  August 10, 2010.
 
 
 /s/ Jane MorlokJane Morlok, Chief Financial Officer
§ 13.440 Subsistence permits for persons whose primary, permanent home is outside a resident zone. ( a ) Any rural resident whose primary, permanent home is outside the boundaries of a resident zone of a national park or monument may apply to the appropriate Superintendent pursuant to the procedures set forth in § 13.495 for a subsistence permit authorizing the permit applicant to engage in subsistence uses within the national park or monument. The Superintendent shall grant the permit if the permit applicant demonstrates that, ( 1 ) Without using aircraft as a means of access for purposes of taking fish and wildlife for subsistence uses, the applicant has (or is a member of a family which has) customarily and traditionally engaged in subsistence uses within a national park or monument; or
( 2 ) The applicant is a local rural resident within a resident zone for another national park or monument, or meets the requirements of paragraph (a)(1) of this section for another national park or monument, and there exists a pattern of subsistence uses (without use of an aircraft as a means of access for purposes of taking fish and wildlife for subsistence uses) between the national park or monument previously utilized by the permit applicant and the national park or monument for which the permit applicant seeks a subsistence permit.
( b ) For purposes of this section, the term “family” shall mean all persons living within a rural resident's household on a permanent basis.
[71 FR 69333, Nov. 30, 2006, as amended at 73 FR 3185, Jan. 17, 2008]
§ 51.37 How will the Director determine that a new concession contract is a qualified concession contract? A new concession contract is a qualified concession contract if the Director determines that: ( a ) The new concession contract provides for the continuation of the visitor services authorized under a previous concession contract. The visitor services to be continued under the new contract may be expanded or diminished in scope but, for purposes of a qualified concession contract, may not materially differ in nature and type from those authorized under the previous concession contract; and either
( b ) The new concession contract that is to replace the previous concession contract is estimated to result in, as determined by the Director, annual gross receipts of less than $500,000 in the first 12 months of its term; or
( c ) The new concession contract is an outfitter and guide concession contract as described in this part.
; Generated by FastSum - an extremely fast checksum utility.
; Go to www.fastsum.com to get your own copy for free.
;
F6F5226EDCCAAFD7374213AA00C3B04F *1997.pdf
E2040AF25C710FD66C3B1ADFAE398A19 *1998.pdf
2C4050F213F9CA9A9D8ACCE03F4A0523 *1999.pdf
6D8166F5E6FED6AD9626EA06E628733D *2000.pdf
5CE25F325334C4F324CAAAEE430E8977 *2001.pdf
2BCE6D9BF1668FE3CF7BC09A0E9517B8 *2002.pdf
909DED349B3AFDB50184C8170E24DC4C *2002.xls
E735C4AE8FC81B048C40C61DCE3ED038 *mis.html
From: Max Schechter

To: CELA

Cc: Graham Wilson

Subject: RE: MUR 8113

Date: Wednesday, April 12, 2023 1:51:18 PM

Attachments: image001.png

Hi Christal,

As we just discussed, could you please email me a tolling agreement for a 30-day extension on this

matter.

Thank you for your help. Please don’t hesitate to call if you have any questions.

Best,

Max

Max Schechter

Associate

Elias Law Group LLP

202-968-4551

(He/Him/His)

CONFIDENTIAL: This email may contain privileged or confidential information and is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any

unauthorized use or disclosure of this communication is prohibited. If you believe that you have received this email in error, please notify

the sender immediately and delete it from your system.

From: CELA <CELA@fec.gov> 

Sent: Monday, March 13, 2023 1:12 PM

To: Max Schechter <mschechter@elias.law>

Cc: Graham Wilson <gwilson@elias.law>

Subject: RE: MUR 8113

Hello Max,

My apologies for the delay. Attached is the granted extension request, enjoy your day.

Thank you,

Christal

Kind regards,

Christal Dennis

Complaints Examination and

Legal Administration

(202) 694-1519

MUR811300028
cela@fec.gov

This email may contain privileged or confidential information and is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). If this email has been

received in error, please notify the sender immediately at (202) 694-1519, or by reply email, and delete the message without copying or

disclosing its contents. Thank you

From: Max Schechter <mschechter@elias.law> 

Sent: Friday, March 10, 2023 9:38 AM

To: CELA <CELA@fec.gov>

Cc: Graham Wilson <gwilson@elias.law>

Subject: MUR 8113

Ms. Dennis,

Please see the attached Designation of Counsel and Request for an Extension in MUR 8113. Please

do not hesitate to contact us if you have any questions.

Thank you,

Max

Max Schechter

Associate

Elias Law Group LLP

202-968-4551

(He/Him/His)

CONFIDENTIAL: This email may contain privileged or confidential information and is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any

unauthorized use or disclosure of this communication is prohibited. If you believe that you have received this email in error, please notify

the sender immediately and delete it from your system.

MUR811300029
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 State,

v.

J. D. EXPUNGED,

 Appellee.

'

'

'

'

'

'

No. 08-03-00216-CR

Appeal from the

383rd District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

O R D E R

The Court has expunged all court records in the above-numbered cause in accordance with 

an expunction order issued by the 383rd District Court of El Paso County, Texas. Consequently, 

the opinion and judgment, as well orders, correspondence, and other documents have been 

removed from the official record and destroyed. The clerk’s record and reporter’s record have 

been turned over to the District Clerk of El Paso County, Texas for destruction in accordance with 

the terms of the expunction order. Any records not completely destroyed have been redacted to 

remove the identity of the Appellant as permitted by the expunction order. All persons are 

advised that the release, maintenance, dissemination, or use of the expunged records and files for 

any purpose is prohibited. TEX.CODE CRIM.PROC.ANN. art. 55.03.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 14

th day of April, 2016.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez and Hughes, JJ.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Glacier Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company")
on form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we,
Michael J. Blodnick, President and Chief Executive Officer, and James H.
Strosahl, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, of Glacier
Bancorp, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or
          78o(d)); and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

                                        March 15, 2006


                                        /s/ Michael J. Blodnick
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Michael J. Blodnick
                                        President/CEO


                                        /s/ James H. Strosahl
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        James H. Strosahl
                                        Executive Vice President/CFO
#### § 1236.48 File format requirements.

(a) The agency must encode, retain, and transfer digitized records in one of the following file formats, either uncompressed or using one of the specified compression codecs in tables 1 and 2 to this section.

(1) Agencies that combine multiple uncompressed TIFF images into PDF/A files using JPEG2000 compression must perform the quality inspection step specified in 1236.46(d) against the resulting PDF/A files.

(2) When using JPEG 2000 visually lossless compression, agencies must determine the amount of compression to apply, not to exceed 20:1, by performing tests and visually evaluating for compression artifacts that obscure or alter the information content.

(b) The agency must encode, retain, and transfer digitized permanent paper records in one of the following file formats, either uncompressed or with one of the compression codecs specified in table 1 to this paragraph (b).

| Format name and version | Acceptable compression codecs |
| --- | --- |
| TIFF 6.0 | Uncompressed, Deflate (ZIP). |
| JPEG2000 part 1 (ISO/IEC 15444-1:2019) | JPEG 2000 part 1 core coding system lossless compression. Agencies may use up to 20:1 visually lossless compression. |
| Portable network graphics 1.2 (PNG) | Deflate (ZIP). |
| PDF/A (Select any version of PDF/A that meets project requirements. However, do not use the attachments feature in PDF/A-3 or PDF/A-4 | Deflate (ZIP), JPEG 2000 part 1 core coding system lossless compression. Agencies may use up to 20:1 visually lossless compression. |

Table 1 to Paragraph (b)—File Format Requirements for Digitized Permanent Paper Records Table

(c) The agency must encode, retain, and transfer digitized photographic print records in one of the following file formats, either uncompressed or with one of the compression codecs specified in the table 2 to this paragraph (c).

(1) For a series of predominantly textual records with interspersed photographic prints, use the formats in table 1 to paragraph (b) of this section for paper records. All photographic prints must be digitized according to the standards in § 1236.50.

(2) For a series of predominantly printed photographs, including those with paper records interspersed, use the file formats in table 2 to this paragraph (c) for photographic print records.

(3) However, the agency must not transcode, or interpolate (upsample) files anywhere in the workflow.

| Format name and version | Acceptable compression codecs |
| --- | --- |
| TIFF 6.0 | Uncompressed, Deflate (ZIP). |
| JPEG2000 part 1 (ISO/IEC 15444-1:2019) | JPEG 2000 part 1 core coding system lossless compression. Agencies may use up to 20:1 visually lossless compression. |
| Portable network graphics 1.2 (PNG) | Deflate (ZIP). |

Table 2 to Paragraph (c)—File Format Requirements for Digitized Permanent Photographic Print Records Table
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21

- 7516

RICHARD PRIDGEN , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. TOYIN SUARAU; TODD E. ISHEE; BRANDESHAWN HARRIS; KELLI HARRIS; DR. MARTA KALINSKI; MR. WILLS; MR. BOYKIN; KIMBERLY SHEARIN; DR. DOWNS; HUNTER SMITH; SGT. ADAMS; NURSING STAFF, Scotland Correctional Inst.; DR. STEWART , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. James C. D ever III , District Judge. ( 5:20

- ct

- 03248

- D )

Submitted : April 26, 2022 Decided: April 29, 2022

Before AGEE and THACKER , Circuit Judges , and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Richard Pridgen , Appellant Pro Se

.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Richard Pridgen seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his claims as

to some , but not all, of the named defendants in the underlying 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541, 545

- 46 (1949). Th e order Pridgen seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate ly presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
#### § 51.94 What information will the Director consider when deciding to approve a transaction?

In deciding whether to approve an assignment or encumbrance, the Director will consider the proformas, all other information submitted by the concessioner, and other information available to the Director.
# Euroopa Liidu C 92A/27.

| | ISSN 1725-5171 |
| --- | --- |
| Euroopa Liidu
  Teataja | C 92A |
| | |
| Eestikeelne väljaanne | Teave ja teatised | 50. köide27. aprill 2007 |

ISSN 1725-5171

Euroopa Liidu

Teataja

C 92A

Eestikeelne väljaanne

Teave ja teatised

50. köide27. aprill 2007

---

| Teatis nr | Sisukord | Lehekülg |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Teated |
| | HALDUSMENETLUSED |
| | Komisjon |
| 2007/C 092A/01 | Teade Euroopa Soolise Võrdõiguslikkuse Instituudi direktori ametikoha täitmise kohta – (palgaaste AD 13) – KOM/2007/10049 | 1 |

Teatis nr

Sisukord

Lehekülg

V   Teated

HALDUSMENETLUSED

Komisjon

2007/C 092A/01

Teade Euroopa Soolise Võrdõiguslikkuse Instituudi direktori ametikoha täitmise kohta – (palgaaste AD 13) – KOM/2007/10049

1

| ET | |
| --- | --- |

ET

---

V Teated

HALDUSMENETLUSED

Komisjon

| 27.4.2007 | ET | Euroopa Liidu Teataja | CA 92/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.4.2007

ET

Euroopa Liidu Teataja

CA 92/1

---

TEADE EUROOPA SOOLISE VÕRDÕIGUSLIKKUSE INSTITUUDI DIREKTORI AMETIKOHA TÄITMISE KOHTA

(palgaaste AD 13)

KOM/2007/10049

(2007/C 92 A/01)

Euroopa Soolise Võrdõiguslikkuse Instituut võtab tööle direktori. Instituut asub Vilniuses.

Direktori määrab ametisse instituudi haldusnõukogu Euroopa Komisjoni koostatud ja esitatud kandidaatide nimekirja alusel. Edukas kandidaat nimetatakse ametisse ajutise töötajana palgaastmega AD 13 vastavalt Euroopa ühenduste muude teenistujate teenistustingimuste artiklile 2a viieks aastaks. Teenistusaega võib pikendada üks kord viieks aastaks. Komisjon järgib võrdsete võimaluste poliitikat.

Kandidaat peab olema mõne Euroopa Liidu liikmesriigi kodanik.

Ametijuhendi, kandideerimise avalduse ning juhised avalduse saatmiseks saab alla laadida järgmiselt Interneti-aadressilt:

http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/personnel_administration/working_senior_mgt_en.htm.

Avalduste laekumise tähtaeg on 4. juuni 2007.

---
§ 1235.34 May NARA destroy transferred records? NARA will not destroy records transferred to NARA's custody except: ( a ) With the written concurrence of the agency or its successor, or
( b ) As authorized on an SF 258.
##### 



Exhibit 21.1
List of Subsidiaries Subsidiaries of
    
    State or Other Jurisdiction of
    
    Names Under Which Suchthe Registrant
    
    Incorporation or Organization
    
    Subsidiaries Do BusinessAccessory Design Group,
Inc.
    
    A Delaware Corporation
    
    Accessory Design Group,
Inc.
Accessory Design
GroupTBACPrince Gardner,
Inc.
    
    A Delaware Corporation
    
    TBAC-Prince Gardner,
Inc.
Prince GardnerH.A. Sheldon Canada,
Ltd.
    
    A Canadian Corporation
    
    1088258 Ontario, Inc.
H.A. Sheldon Canada
Ltd.Amity/Rolfs, Inc.
    
    A Delaware Corporation
    
    Amity/Rolfs, Inc.TBAC General Management
Company
    
    A Nevada Corporation
    
    TBAC General Management
CompanyTBAC Investments, Inc.
    
    A Nevada Corporation
    
    TBAC Investments, Inc.TBAC Investment Trust
    
    A Pennsylvania
Business Trust
    
    TBAC Investment TrustTBAC Management
Company, L.P.
    
    A Delaware Limited
Partnership
    
    TBAC Management
Company, L.P.Tandy Brands
Accessories Handbags,
Inc.
    
    A Delaware Corporation
    
    Tandy Brands
Accessories Handbags,
Inc.Stagg Industries, Inc.
    
    An Alabama Corporation
    
    Stagg Industries, Inc.TBACTorel, Inc.
    
    A Delaware Corporation
    
    TBACTorel, Inc.TBACMass Merchant
Quality Control, Inc.
    
    A Delaware Corporation
    
    TBACMass Merchant
Quality Control, Inc.Superior Merchandise
Company
    
    A Louisiana Corporation
    
    Superior Merchandise
ETONTBACAcquisition, Inc.
    
    A Delaware Corporation
    
    TBACAcquisition, Inc.
#### § 404.1 General.

The information in this part is furnished for the guidance of the public and in compliance with the requirements of the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552, as amended. Nothing in this part shall be construed to entitle any person to any service or to the disclosure of any record to which such person is not entitled under the FOIA. The rules in this part should be read in conjunction with the text of the FOIA and the Uniform Freedom of Information Fee Schedule and Guidelines published by the Office of Management and Budget (“OMB Guidelines”).
#### George A. Treadwell, Respondent, *v.*William A. Clark et al., Appellants, Impleaded with Others.

(Submitted December 9, 1907;

decided December 17, 1907.)

Motion for re-argument denied, with ten dollars costs. (See 190 N. Y. 51.)