alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 5145 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to prohibit the use of foreign 

feedstocks for purposes of the clean fuel production credit, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 24, 2024 

Mr. MARSHALL (for himself, Mr. BROWN, Mr. RICKETTS, Ms. KLOBUCHAR, 

Mrs. FISCHER, Ms. BALDWIN, and Ms. SMITH) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to prohibit 

the use of foreign feedstocks for purposes of the clean 

fuel production credit, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Farmer First Fuel 

5 Incentives Act’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 5145 IS

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON FOREIGN FEEDSTOCKS FOR 

2 CLEAN FUEL PRODUCTION CREDIT. 

3 (a) PROHIBITION ON FOREIGN FEEDSTOCKS.—Sec4 tion 45Z(f)(1)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 

5 is amended— 

6 (1) in clause (i)(II)(bb), by striking ‘‘and’’ at 

7 the end, 

8 (2) in clause (ii), by striking the period at the 

9 end and inserting ‘‘, and’’, and 

10 (3) by adding at the end the following new 

11 clause: 

12 ‘‘(iii) such fuel is derived from a feed13 stock which was produced or grown in the 

14 United States.’’. 

15 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

16 this section shall apply to transportation fuel sold after 

17 December 31, 2024. 

18 SEC. 3. EXTENSION OF CLEAN FUEL PRODUCTION CREDIT. 

19 Section 45Z(g) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 

20 is amended by striking ‘‘December 31, 2027’’ and insert21 ing ‘‘December 31, 2034’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Revised Ch 7 - to mesh w/ preamble language 

 RobertJ Wayland 

 to: Cortney_Higgins 

 12/16/2011 03:47 PM 

 Cc: Bill Maxwell 

Chapter 7_StatutoryandExecutiveOrderAnalyses_1216v3.docx
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 703 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to make improvements 

to the redistribution of residency slots under the Medicare program 

after a hospital closes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 8, 2023 

Ms. ROSEN (for herself and Mr. BOOZMAN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to make 

improvements to the redistribution of residency slots 

under the Medicare program after a hospital closes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Physicians for Under5 served Areas Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 703 IS

1 SEC. 2. IMPROVEMENTS TO THE REDISTRIBUTION OF RESI2 DENCY SLOTS UNDER THE MEDICARE PRO3 GRAM AFTER A HOSPITAL CLOSES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1886(h)(4)(H)(vi) of the 

5 Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(h)(4)(H)(vi)) is 

6 amended— 

7 (1) in subclause (II)— 

8 (A) by striking item (cc) and redesignating 

9 item (dd) as item (cc); and 

10 (B) in item (cc), as redesignated under 

11 subparagraph (A)— 

12 (i) by striking ‘‘Fourth’’ and inserting 

13 ‘‘Third’’; and 

14 (ii) by striking ‘‘item (cc)’’ and insert15 ing ‘‘item (bb)’’; and 

16 (2) in subclause (III), by striking ‘‘likelihood of 

17 filling’’ and all that follows and inserting the fol18 lowing: ‘‘likelihood of— 

19 ‘‘(aa) starting to utilize the 

20 positions made available under 

21 this clause within 2 years; and 

22 ‘‘(bb) filling the positions 

23 made available under this clause 

24 within 5 years.’’. 

25 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

26 subsection (a) shall apply to the redistribution of residency 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 703 IS

1 slots with respect to hospitals that close on or after the 

2 date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32



SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS



The undersigned hereby certify that the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Insight Communications Company, Inc. (the Registrant) for the quarter ended June 30,
2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



/s/ Michael S. WillnerMichael S. WillnerVice Chairman, President and Chief Executive OfficerAugust 2, 2004/s/ John AbbotJohn AbbotSenior Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerAugust 2, 2004
§ 72.73 Residency requirements. ( a ) *Background.* UPARR policy prohibits discrimination on the basis of residence (refer to § 72.65(b)) including preferential reservation or membership systems on properties improved with UPARR assistance. This prohibition applies to both regularly scheduled and special events. The general provisions regarding non-discrimination at sites assisted under Interior programs and, thereby, all other recreation facilities managed by the recipient, are covered in 43 CFR part 17 which implements the provisions of title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 for the Department.
( b ) *Policy.* There shall be no discrimination for UPARR assisted programs or services on the basis of residence, except in reasonable fee differentials. Post-completion compliance responsibilities of the recipient should continue to ensure that discrimination on the basis of residency is not occurring.
( c ) *Fees.* For parks or recreation properties or programs funded with UPARR assistance, fees charged to nonresidents cannot exceed twice that charged to residents. Where there is no charge for residents but a fee is charged to nonresidents, the nonresident fees cannot exceed fees charged at comparable State or local public facilities having fee systems. These fee provisions apply only to the approved 1010 areas applicable to the recipient. Reservation, membership, or annual permit systems available to residents must also be available to nonresidents and the period of availability must be the same for both residents and nonresidents. Recipients are prohibited from providing residents the option of purchasing annual or daily permits while at the same time restricting nonresidents to the purchase of annual permits only.
1 The Honorable Laurie Smith Camp, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 09-3310

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Nebraska. Vincent A. Caulfield, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: April 21, 2010 Filed: April 26, 2010

___________ Before WOLLMAN, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Vincent Caulfield pleaded guilty to bei ng a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1 ), and to being subject to forfeiture of firearms. The district court 1 sentenced him within the applicable advisory Guidelines range to 57 months in prison and 3 years of supervised release. On appeal, his counsel has filed a brief under Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), in which he requests leave to withdraw and argues that the court s hould have imposed a shorter sentence, and-2- should have ordered that the sentence run concurrently with the sentence the court imposed in a separate case involving Caulfield ’s violation of supervised release terms.

We conclude that the district court co mmitted no procedural or substantive error in sentencing Caulfield. SeeUnited States v. Feemster , 572 F.3d 455, 461 (8th Cir. 2009) (en banc) (standards for reviewing sentence). In particular, we conclude that it was not unreasonable for the district court to order that the sentence imposed in the instant case was to run consecutively to th e sentence imposed in the case involving his supervised release. See U.S.S.G. § 7B1.3, comment. (n.4) (it is Commission’s recommendation that any sentence of imprisonment for criminal offense that is imposed after revocation of supervised re lease be run consecutively to any term of imprisonment imposed upon revocation); see also United States v. Lee , 545 F.3d 678, 680 (8th Cir. 2008) (per curiam) (with limite d exception, district court’s decision to impose consecutive or concurrent sentence is reviewed only for reasonableness), cert. denied , 129 S. Ct. 2758 (2009).
Having reviewed the record i ndependently under Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), we have found no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment, and we grant counsel’s request to withdraw.

______________________________
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF nFRONT, INC. FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                      25,352,238
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,663,332
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            28,720,648
<PP&E>                                       4,587,068
<DEPRECIATION>                                 311,315
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              33,038,693
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,569,015
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    34,900,130
<OTHER-SE>                                  (6,430,452)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                33,038,693
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,518,986
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,433,078
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,582
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (2,563,710)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (2,563,710)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (2,563,710)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.18)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Biophan Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 31, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert
J. Wood, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my
knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

October 17, 2005

/s/Robert J. Wood
-------------------
Robert J. Wood
Chief Financial Officer


                                       24
Case 16-30278 Doc 9 Filed 09/27/16 Entered 09/28/16 09:43:23 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

UMC; AND CORVEL CORPORATION, Appellants, vs. CELENA GILLESPIE, Respondent. No. 83970 

# FILE AUG 1 1 2022 .Th X BROWN
-UPREME COURT DE TY CLERK ORDER DISMISSINGAPPEAL Cause appearing, appellants' motion for a voluntary dismissal of this appeal is granted. This appeal is dismissed. NRAP 42(b).

It is so ORDERED. CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT

cc: Hon. Eric Johnson, District Judge William C. Turner, Settlement Judge Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, LLP/Las Vegas Bertoldo Baker Carter Smith & Cullen Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA CLERK'S ORDER (0) 1947 BY: ELIZABETHA. BRO

_

4.... Z



## 2 , L 1

# 7S
# EUR-Lex - 12008E293 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008E293

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - PART SIX: INSTITUTIONAL AND FINANCIAL PROVISIONS - TITLE I: INSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS - Chapter 2: Legal acts of the Union, adoption procedures and other provisions - Section 2: Procedures for the adoption of acts and other provisions - Article 293 (ex Article 250 TEC) **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0173 - 0173 *

Article 293

(ex Article 250 TEC)

1. Where, pursuant to the Treaties, the Council acts on a proposal from the Commission, it may amend that proposal only by acting unanimously, except in the cases referred to in paragraphs 10 and 13 of Article 294, in Articles 310, 312 and 314 and in the second paragraph of Article 315.

2. As long as the Council has not acted, the Commission may alter its proposal at any time during the procedures leading to the adoption of a Union act.

--------------------------------------------------
**Exhibit
      32.1**




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Genesis Capital
      Corporation of Nevada (the "Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
      "Report"), the undersigned Richard Astrom, Chief Executive Officer of Genesis
      Capital Corporation of Nevada, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)
            the
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            the
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





Dated:
      August 14, 2007





/s/
      RICHARD ASTROM


Richard
      Astrom


Chief
      Executive Officer
§ 327.14 Public property. ( a ) Destruction, injury, defacement, removal or any alteration of public property including, but not limited to, developed facilities, natural formations, mineral deposits, historical and archaeological features, paleontological resources, boundary monumentation or markers and vegetative growth, is prohibited except when in accordance with written permission of the District Commander.
( b ) Cutting or gathering of trees or parts of trees and/or the removal of wood from project lands is prohibited without written permission of the District Commander.
( c ) Gathering of dead wood on the ground for use in designated recreation areas as firewood is permitted, unless prohibited and posted by the District Commander.
( d ) The use of metal detectors is permitted on designated beaches or other previously disturbed areas unless prohibited by the District Commander for reasons of protection of archaeological, historical or paleontological resources. Specific information regarding metal detector policy and designated use areas is available at the Manager's Office. Items found must be handled in accordance with §§ 327.15 and 327.16 except for non-identifiable items such as coins of value less than $25.
[65 FR 6901, Feb. 11, 2000]
EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

PltRPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF EMERY L. FRAZIER, SECRETARY OF THE SENATE 

BY LARRY M. WHEELER, EXECUTIVE CLERE 

Wednesday, June 29, 1966 

TREATIES 

Date of Calendar Treaty No. Subject Action of committee report No. 

-

1965 

June 29 2 Ex. H (86th Ccng., Hague Protocol to Warsaw Convention ____ Reported favorably by 

1st sess.). Mr. Fulbright from 

the Committee on 

Foreign Relations, 

with a printed report. 

(See Ex. Rept. No. 3, 

89th Ccng., 1st sess.) 

Aug. 3 3 Ex. D (88th Cong., Consular Convention With the Soviet Reported favorably by 

2d sess.). Union. Mr. Fulbright from 

the Committee on 

Foreign Relations, 

with a printed report. 

(See Ex. Rept. No. 4, 

89th Ccng., ht sess.) 

Minority views filed 

Aug. 5, 1965. (See 

Ex. Rept. No. 4, p. 2. 

89th Ccng., 1st seas.) 

NOMINATION 

Date of Calendar Message Name of nominee Office Predecessor 

report No. No. 

FEDERAL POWER 

COMMISSION 

1966 

June 28 858 205 Lawrence J. O'Connor, Jr., A member of the Federal Reappointment. 

of Texas. Power Commission for 

the term of 5 years expiring June 22, 1971. 

50-022-6.6-No. 232 

i.S. . WiOVERHIIEHT PRINTING OF'F\CEdtil
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 4(b)

                                  COMMON STOCK

Number                                                                    Shares

                                 ISNI.net, Inc.

              Incorporated Under The Laws of The State of Delaware

                                CUSIP 450287 10 7



This certifies that ___________________________________________________ is the
registered holder of__________________________________________________ Shares

 FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF THE COMMON STOCK, $0.0001 PAR VALUE, OF

                                 ISNI.net, Inc.

transferable only on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person
or by Attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed.

         In Witness Whereof, the said Corporation has caused this Certificate to
be signed by its duly authorized officers and its Corporate Seal to be hereunder
affixed this _____ day of ________________ A.D. _____.



----------------------------                        ----------------------------
SECRETARY                                           PRESIDENT





JERSEY TRANSFER AND TRUST CO.
201 Bloomfield Ave., Box #36                        ----------------------------
Verona, New Jersey   07044                          AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE
                                                    TRANSFER AGENT

<PAGE>   2
         For Value Received, ________________________ hereby sell, assign and
transfer unto _________________________________________________________________
___________________ Shares represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby
irrevocably constitute and appoint __________________________________ Attorney
to transfer the said Shares on the books of the within named Corporation with
full power of substitution in the premises.

Dated ___________________________

In presence of

NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE OF THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS
WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE, IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT
ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER.
# EUR-Lex - 12008E269 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008E269

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - PART SIX: INSTITUTIONAL AND FINANCIAL PROVISIONS - TITLE I: INSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS - Chapter 1: The institutions - Section 5: The Court of Justice of the European Union - Article 269 **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0164 - 0164 *

Article 269

The Court of Justice shall have jurisdiction to decide on the legality of an act adopted by the European Council or by the Council pursuant to Article 7 of the Treaty on European Union solely at the request of the Member State concerned by a determination of the European Council or of the Council and in respect solely of the procedural stipulations contained in that Article.

Such a request must be made within one month from the date of such determination. The Court shall rule within one month from the date of the request.

--------------------------------------------------
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED APRIL 12, 2023

NO. 03

- 23

- 00073

- CV

Natin Paul, Individually and as Trustee of the Natin Paul Management Trust Dated

February 29, 2012 , Appellant

v.

HAR

- 3M, LLC , Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 459TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES TRIANA AND THEOFANIS

DISMISSED ON APPELLANT’ S MOTION

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE THEOFANIS

This is an appeal from th e judgment signed by the tr i a l court on November 9, 2022

. Appell ant

has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, and having considered the motion , the Court agrees that

the m otion shou ld be granted . Therefore, the Court grants the motion and dismiss es the appeal

.

The appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.
#### § 51.97 May the Director open to renegotiation or modify the terms of a concession contract as a condition to the approval of a transaction?

The Director may not open to renegotiation or modify the terms and conditions of a concession contract as a condition to the approval of an assignment or encumbrance. The exception is if the Director determines that renegotiation or modification is required to avoid an adverse impact on the protection, conservation or preservation of the resources of a park area or an adverse impact on the provision of necessary and appropriate visitor services at reasonable rates and charges.
EXHIBIT
32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Salon Media Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the “Report”), I, Norman Blashka, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
 
 (2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Norman
Blashka
 August
      14, 2009
                  Norman
      Blashka
 Chief
Financial Officer
#### §§ 812.152-812.159 [Reserved]
#### § 1260.4 What NARA holdings are covered by this part?

The NARA holdings covered by this part are records legally transferred to NARA, including Federal records, 44 U.S.C. 2107; Presidential records, 44 U.S.C. 2201-2207; Nixon Presidential materials, 44 U.S.C. 2111 note; and donated historical materials, 44 U.S.C. 2111.