alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EUR-Lex - 12006E/PRO/21 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12006E/PRO/21

**Treaty establishing the European Community (consolidated version) - D. Protocols annexed to the Treaty establishing the European Community - Protocol (No 21) on the convergence criteria referred to in Article 121 of the Treaty establishing the European Community (1992) **

*
Official Journal C 321 E , 29/12/2006 P. 0295 - 0296 *

Protocol (No 21)

on the convergence criteria referred to in Article 121 of the Treaty establishing the European Community (1992)

THE HIGH CONTRACTING PARTIES,

DESIRING to lay down the details of the convergence criteria which shall guide the Community in taking decisions on the passage to the third stage of economic and monetary union, referred to in Article 121(1) of this Treaty,

HAVE AGREED upon the following provisions, which shall be annexed to the Treaty establishing the European Community.

Article 1

1

2

percentage points that of, at most, the three best performing Member States in terms of price stability. Inflation shall be measured by means of the consumer price index on a comparable basis, taking into account differences in national definitions.

Article 2

The criterion on the government budgetary position referred to in the second indent of Article 121(1) of this Treaty shall mean that at the time of the examination the Member State is not the subject of a Council decision under Article 104(6) of this Treaty that an excessive deficit exists.

Article 3

The criterion on participation in the exchange-rate mechanism of the European Monetary System referred to in the third indent of Article 121(1) of this Treaty shall mean that a Member State has respected the normal fluctuation margins provided for by the exchange-rate mechanism on the European Monetary System without severe tensions for at least the last two years before the examination. In particular, the Member State shall not have devalued its currency's bilateral central rate against any other Member State's currency on its own initiative for the same period.

Article 4

The criterion on the convergence of interest rates referred to in the fourth indent of Article 121(1) of this Treaty shall mean that, observed over a period of one year before the examination, a Member State has had an average nominal long-term interest rate that does not exceed by more than 2 percentage points that of, at most, the three best performing Member States in terms of price stability. Interest rates shall be measured on the basis of long-term government bonds or comparable securities, taking into account differences in national definitions.

Article 5

The statistical data to be used for the application of this Protocol shall be provided by the Commission.

Article 6

The Council shall, acting unanimously on a proposal from the Commission and after consulting the European Parliament, the EMI or the ECB as the case may be, and the Committee referred to in Article 114, adopt appropriate provisions to lay down the details of the convergence criteria referred to in Article 121 of this Treaty, which shall then replace this Protocol.

--------------------------------------------------
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 17
- 60105 GREEN TREE SERVICING, L.L.C.; WALTER INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT CORPORATION; BEST INSURORS, INCORPORATED; MID STATE CAPITAL, L.L.C.; MID STATE TRUST II; MID STATE TRUST III; MID STATE TRUST IV; MID STATE TRUST V; MID STATE TRUST VI; MID STATE TRUST VII; MID STATE TRUST VIII; MID STATE TRUST IX; MID STATE TRU ST X; MID STATE TRUST XI; WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY; MID
- STATE CAPITAL CORPORATION 2004
- 1 TRUST; MID
STATE CAPITAL CORPORATION 2005
- 1 TRUST; MID
- STATE CAPITAL CORPORATION 2006
- 1 TRUST; MID
- STATE CAPITAL TRUST 2010
- 1, Plaintiffs
- Appellees,
v. BILLY R. BROWN, Defendant
- Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi USDC No. 3:16
- CV
- 317 Before KING, ELROD , and GRAVES, C ircuit Judges . PER CURIAM: * This appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction based upon binding precedent in a virtually identical case . Green Tree Servicing, L.L.C. v. Charles ,

* Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED February 7, 2018

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 17-60105 Document: 00514340091 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/07/2018No. 17
- 60105

2 872 F.3d 637 (5th Cir. 2017) ; accord Green Tree Servicing, L.L.C. v. Campbell , 701 F. App’x 383 (5th Cir. 2017) (per curiam); Green Tree Servicing, L.L.C. v. Mathis , 701 F. App’x 383 (5th Cir. 2017) (per curiam) . Case: 17-60105 Document: 00514340091 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/07/2018
EXHIBIT
32





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Integrated Environmental Technologies,
Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, William E. Prince, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.








/s/William
      E. PrinceWilliam
      E. PrinceChief
      Executive Officer andPrincipal
      Financial OfficerNovember
      13, 2008
#### § 64.10 Matching share.

The State or local applicant's matching share may consist of cash, or in-kind contributions consistent with guidelines set forth in Attachment F of OMB Circular A-102.
§ 60.13 Publication in the Federal Register and other NPS notification. ( a ) When a nomination is received, NPS will publish notice in the Federal Register that the property is being considered for listing in the National Register. A 15-day commenting period from date of publication will be provided. When necessary to assist in the preservation of historic properties this 15-day period may be shortened or waived.
( b ) NPS shall notify the appropriate State Historic Preservation Officer, Federal Preservation Officer, person or local government when there is no approved State program of the listing of the property in the National Register and will publish notice of the listing in the Federal Register.
( c ) In nominations where the owner of any privately owned property (or a majority of the owners of such properties within a district or single property with multiple owners) has objected and the Keeper has determined the nomination eligible for the National Register, NPS shall notify the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Federal Preservation Officer (for Federal or concurrent nominations), the person or local government where there is no approved State Historic Preservation Program and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation. NPS will publish notice of the determination of eligibility in the Federal Register.
Date of 

report 

1967 

Apr. 14 

May 10 

10 

10 

10 

10 

~ruatr of t4r luitrb ~tatrs NINETIETH CONGRESS 

FIRST SESSION-Began January 10, 1967 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Prepared under the dit'ection of FRANCIS R. VALEO, Secretary of the Senate 

By GERALD A. HACKETT, Executive Clerk 

Thursday, May 11, 1967 

NOMINATIONS 

Calendar Message N(). No. NllJile of nominee Otll.ce Predecessor 

AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT 

192 86 Rutherford M. Poats, of Deputy Administrator, 

Virginia.. Agency for International 

Development. 

[NEW REPORTS] 

U.S. COAST GUARD 

The following-named 

officer of the U.S. Coast 

Guard Reserve for promotion to the grade indicated: 

484 141 Capt. Merton W. Stoff!e ___ Rear admiraL ___ ------ __ _ 

The following-named 

officers of the U.S. Coast 

Guard for promotion to 

the grade indicated: 

485 142 Capt. RoderickY. Edwards _ _____ do ___________________ 

485 142 Capt. Robert W. Goehring _ ___ __ do ___________________ 

485 142 Capt. Ross P. Bullard _____ _____ do ___________________ 

485 142 Capt. Orvan R. Smeder ____ __ __ _ do _________ ___ _____ __ 

NOMINATIONS PLACED ON THE SECRETARY'S DESK 

In the Coast Guard 

The nominations beginning Melvin J. Hartman, to be lieutenant commander, and ending Charles H. 

MacLean III, to be chief warrant officer (W- 2), which nominations were received by the Senate and appeared 

in the Congressional Record on May 9, 1967. 

65-022-67--'No. 49 

U. S GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1U7
#### § 51.63 When a new concessioner pays a prior concessioner for a leasehold surrender interest, what is the leasehold surrender interest in the related capital improvements for purposes of a new concession contract?

A new leasehold surrender interest concession contract awarded to a new concessioner will require the new concessioner to pay the prior concessioner its leasehold surrender interest value in existing capital improvements as determined under § 51.62. The new concessioner upon payment will have a leasehold surrender interest in the related capital improvements on a unit-by-unit basis under the terms of the new leasehold surrender interest contract. Instead of initial construction cost, the initial value of such leasehold surrender interest will be the leasehold surrender interest value that the new concessioner was required to pay the prior concessioner.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 24, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

134371 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 134371 

 COA: 276503 

Genesee CC: 02-009700-FC 

KEITH LINELL BELL,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 20, 2007 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

s0917 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 24, 2007 

 Clerk
AIR VENTURES HAWAII, LLC., #I96A394L ( PART 135) AND 

#40JJWP13 (LOA), would like to apply for a grant of exemption from 

Title 14, Part 120, to permit us, operating under separate parts of the 

regulations, to cover, with an equivalent level of safety, our safetysensitive employees under one drug and alcohol testing program.

We are currently covered for both our 135 and our Air Tour programs 

by an approved FAA/DOT drug and alcohol testing program, through 

a Consortium/Third Party Administrator:

Professional Air Charter Services, Inc.

(program manager John Carpenter)

Drug Abatement / AMPP Consortium

Kansas City, MO

816 942 2144
Document

Exhibit 10.3


FOX FACTORY, INC.
AMENDMENT TO THE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
(Chris Tutton)




This AMENDMENT TO THE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”), entered into as of August 5, 2020 (the “Effective Date”), by and between Fox Factory, Inc., a California corporation (the “Company”), and Chris Tutton, an individual (“Executive”), amends that certain Employment Agreement dated as of May 1, 2018, by and between the Company and Executive (the “Employment Agreement”).  All terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed thereto in the Employment Agreement.


RECITALS


WHEREAS, Executive and the Company hereto desire to amend certain provisions of the Employment Agreement in accordance with the terms of this Amendment.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and the respective mutual agreements contained herein, the parties to this Amendment agree as follows:
Section 1.  Amendments. The Employment Agreement is amended, effective as of the Effective Date, as follows: 
      a. Section 3(b) is AMENDED in its entirety to read as follows: 
“(b) Performance Bonus (60% Target).  Executive will be eligible to receive a bonus (the “Performance Bonus”) as structured, calculated and determined by Fox Factory Holding Corp.’s (the “Parent”) Board of Directors Compensation Committee (“Compensation Committee”).    In order to encourage and reward longevity and retention, except as otherwise specifically provided in Section 4(b) hereof, Executive shall not be entitled to any Performance Bonus unless Executive is employed by the Company on the last day of the fiscal year for which the Performance Bonus is based.  If Executive has been on leave and not actively working for thirteen (13) or more weeks in the fiscal year, Executive’s Performance Bonus will be reduced pro rata based on the number of days Executive was on leave during the fiscal year. 
Section 2.  Effect on Employment Agreement.  On and after the Effective Date, each reference in the Employment Agreement to “this Agreement”, “hereunder”, “hereof”, “herein” or words of similar import shall mean and be a reference to the Employment Agreement as amended hereby.  Except as specifically modified by the terms of this Amendment, all of the terms, provisions, covenants, warranties and agreements contained in the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect and are hereby ratified.


Section 3. Governing Law.  This Amendment shall be construed under and shall be governed by the laws of the State of California.  
Section 4. Counterparts.  This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which will be deemed to be an original copy of this Amendment and all of which, when taken together, will be deemed to constitute one and the same agreement.
1






IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed and delivered this Amendment as of the date first above written.


The Company




Fox Factory, Inc.
a California corporation 


By: /s/ Dale A. Silvia
Name: Dale A. Silvia
Title: Chief Human Resources Officer




The EXECUTIVE 




/s/ Chris Tutton
Chris Tutton
2
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 201 (Wednesday, October 18, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 61509]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-8743]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Pursuant to the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act

    Notice is hereby given that on October 3, 2006 a proposed Consent 
Decree with the Estate of Irving Rubin in United States v. Mallinckrodt 
et al., Civil Action No. 4:02CV1488, was lodged with the United States 
District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri. In this action the 
United States sought recovery of response costs incurred by the 
Environmental Protection Agency at the Great Lakes Container 
Corporation Superfund Site located in St. Louis, Missouri. The Consent 
Decree resolves our claims for past and future response costs against 
the Estate of Irving Rubin (``the Estate''). The Consent Decree 
requires the Estate to pay the EPA Hazardous Substance Superfund 
$300,000 for reimbursement of past response costs.
    The Department of Justice will receive for a period of thirty (30) 
days from the date of this publication comments relating to the Consent 
Decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant Attorney General, 
Environmental and Natural Resources Division, P.O. Box 7611, U.S. 
Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20044-7611, and should refer to 
United States v. Mallinckrodt, et al. D.J. Ref. 90-11-3-07280. The 
Consent Decree may be examined at the Office of the United States 
Attorney, Thomas F. Eagleton U.S. Courthouse, 111 South 10th Street, 
20th Floor, St. Louis, MO 63102, and at U.S. EPA Region VII, 901 North 
5th Street, Kansas City, Kansas 66025. During the public comment 
period, the Consent Decree may also be examined on the following 
Department of Justice Web site, to http://www.usdoj.gov/enrd/Consent_Decrees.html. A copy of the Consent Decree may also be obtained by mail 
from the Consent Decree Library, P.O. Box 7611, U.S. Department of 
Justice, Washington, DC 20044-7611 or by faxing or e-mailing a request 
to Tonia Fleetwood (<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5c283332353d723a303939282b3333381c292f383336723b332a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="50243f3e39317e363c353524273f3f34102523343f3a7e373f26">[email protected]</span></a>), fax No. (202) 514-0097, 
phone confirmation number (202) 514-1547. In requesting a copy from the 
Consent Decree Library, please enclose a check in the amount of $5.00 
for United States v. Mallinckrodt, et al. (25 cents per page 
reproduction cost) payable to the U.S. Treasury.

Robert Maher,
Assistant Section Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section.
[FR Doc. 06-8743 Filed 10-17-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# EUR-Lex - 12007P032 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12007P032

**Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - TITLE IV - SOLIDARITY - Article 32 - Prohibition of child labour and protection of young people at work **

*
Official Journal 303 , 14/12/2007 P. 0009 - 0009 *

Article 32

Prohibition of child labour and protection of young people at work

The employment of children is prohibited. The minimum age of admission to employment may not be lower than the minimum school-leaving age, without prejudice to such rules as may be more favourable to young people and except for limited derogations.

Young people admitted to work must have working conditions appropriate to their age and be protected against economic exploitation and any work likely to harm their safety, health or physical, mental, moral or social development or to interfere with their education.

--------------------------------------------------
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
                      SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies that:

         1.       The Annual Report on Form 10-K of SPSS Inc. for the period
                  ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and
                  Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), fully
                  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of SPSS Inc.



Date:    March 16, 2005                By: /s/ Jack Noonan
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Jack Noonan
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 23.2**

 

**Independent Accountants’ Consent**

To the ManagingBoard of NYSE Euronext 

11 Wall Street 

New York, New York10005 

United States of America 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-141869) on Form S-8 of NYSE Euronext of our report dated March 22, 2007, withrespect to the consolidated balance sheets of Euronext N.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in equity, and cash flows for the years thenended, which appears in the December 31, 2007 annual report on Form 10-K of NYSE Euronext. 

Our report refers to the adoption of the amendment to IAS21 “The Effects of Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates” on net investments in foreign operations and the “fair value option” amendment to IAS 39 “Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement” as of January 1, 2006.

Our report also states that International Financial Reporting Standards as adopted by the European Union vary in certain significant respects from U.S.generally accepted accounting principles, and that information relating to the nature and effect of such differences is presented in Note 3.12 to the consolidated financial statements. 

 

/s/ KPMG ACCOUNTANTS N.V. 

Amstelveen, The Netherlands 

March 25, 2008
§ 254.40 Applications. ( a ) A request for conveyance of National Forest System land must be made in writing to the District Ranger or the Forest Supervisor who has administrative jurisdiction over the land.
( b ) The applicant shall bear all reasonable costs of administration, survey, and appraisal incidental to the conveyance.
( c ) Costs incidental to the conveyance may be waived at the discretion of the Chief of the Forest Service.
Case 16-26897 Doc 1 Filed 08/22/16 Entered 08/22/16 14:22:57 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 10
Case 16-26897 Doc 1 Filed 08/22/16 Entered 08/22/16 14:22:57 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 10
Case 16-26897 Doc 1 Filed 08/22/16 Entered 08/22/16 14:22:57 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 10
Case 16-26897 Doc 1 Filed 08/22/16 Entered 08/22/16 14:22:57 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 10
Case 16-26897 Doc 1 Filed 08/22/16 Entered 08/22/16 14:22:57 Desc Main

 Document Page 5 of 10
Case 16-26897 Doc 1 Filed 08/22/16 Entered 08/22/16 14:22:57 Desc Main

 Document Page 6 of 10
Case 16-26897 Doc 1 Filed 08/22/16 Entered 08/22/16 14:22:57 Desc Main

 Document Page 7 of 10
Case 16-26897 Doc 1 Filed 08/22/16 Entered 08/22/16 14:22:57 Desc Main

 Document Page 8 of 10
Case 16-26897 Doc 1 Filed 08/22/16 Entered 08/22/16 14:22:57 Desc Main

 Document Page 9 of 10
Case 16-26897 Doc 1 Filed 08/22/16 Entered 08/22/16 14:22:57 Desc Main

 Document Page 10 of 10