alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of the Application of the Mayor, Aldermen and Commonalty of the City of New York Relative to Opening Lorillard Place from Third Avenue to Pelham Avenue. The Beth Eden Baptist Church, Appellant; Charles A. Tatum, Respondent.

(Argued February 20, 1907;

decided March 12, 1907.)

*Matter of Mayor, etc., of N. Y. (Lorillard Place),*114 App. Div. 904, affirmed. '

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in-the first judicial department, entered June 23,1906, which affirmed an order of Special Term confirming the report of commissioners of estimate and assessment in the above-entitled proceeding.

*551
      *Richard Krause*for appellant.

*Frank II. Edmunds*for respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Cray, Edward T. Bartlett» Haight, Vann, Werner and Chase, JJ.
[No. 3940.]

#### Bud Garrison et al *v.*The State.

1. Variance—Scire Facias.—The scire facias in this case declared upon a forfeiture of recognizance, and the instrument relied upon by the State in proof was a forfeited bail bond. Held, that the variance between the pleading and the proof was fatal.

*3432. Same—Scire Facias failing to set out the date of the recognizance was defective, but the defect was such as, in default of exception, will not be considered on appeal.

Appeal from the District Court of Parker. Tried below before the Hon. R. E. Beckham.

The appeal in this case was prosecuted from a judgment on the forfeited bail bond of Bud Garrison, held under a charge of cattle theft. The amount of the bond and judgment was five hundred dollars.

*Bidwell & Kuteman,*for the appellants.

*J. H. Burts,*Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Opinion delivered May 19, 1886.

Hurt, Judge.

This is a *scire facias*case. The writ of *scire facias*serves the purpose of a citation, and petition. The State by the writ declares upon a forfeited recognizance. Upon the trial the State relied upon a forfeited bond. In this there was a fatal variance in the pleading and proof.

Again, the citation fails to give the date of the recognizance (Art. 448, subdiv. 4, Code Crim. Proc.), but as there was no exception taken to it on this ground, it comes too late after answer to the merits.

Because of the variance between the pleadings and proof, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

*Reversed and remanded.*
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on September 28, 2006, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), ASTM International—Standards (“ASTM”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing additions or changes to its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, ASTM has provided an updated list of current, ongoing ASTM standards activities originating between May 2006 and September 2006, designated as Work Items. A complete listing of ASTM Work Items, along with a brief description of each, is available at                     *http://www.astm.org*.                

                    On September 15, 2004, ASTM filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on November 10, 2004 (69 FR 65226).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on May 24, 2006. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on June 15, 2006 (71 FR 34644).                

                    For additional information, please contact: Thomas B. O'Brien, Jr., General Counsel, at 100 Barr Harbor Drive, West Conshohocken, PA 19428, telephone 610-832-9597, e-mail address                     *tobrien@astm.org*.                

Patricia A. Brink,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 06-8793 Filed 10-19-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
NINETIETH CONGRESS 

FIRST SESSION-Began January 10, 1967 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Pre pared under the direction of FRANCIS R. V ALEO, Secretary of the Senate 

By GERALD A. H ACKETT, Executive Clerk 

Tuesday, April 25, 1967 

Ordered, That the Senate vote at 2 30 p.m. on Tuesday, Apnl 25, 1967, on the resolutwn of ratrfication of 

the Treaty on Outer Space (Ex. D, 90th Cong., first sess.). 

(Aprzl 24, 1967.) 

TREATY 

Date of Oa.Iendar Treaty No I SubJect I Action of committee report No 

1967 

Apr. 18 15 Ex. D (90th Cong., Treaty on outer space ____ __ ______________ Reported favorably by 

1st sess.) Mr. Fulbright, from 

the Committee on 

Foreign Relations, 

with a printed report. 

(See Ex. Rept. No.8, 

90th Cong., 1st sess.) 

NOMINATION 

Date of Calendar Message Name oino=ee Otllce Predecessor 

report No. No 

AGENCY FOR INTER· 

NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT 

1967 

Apr. 14 129 86 Rutherford M. Poats, of Deputy Administrator, 

Virginia. Agency for International 

I 

Development. 

65-022-67-No. 38 

Q ! GOVERNMENT PRINT(NG OFFICE 1967
58830 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 193 / Thursday, October 5, 2006 / Notices 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Office of the Secretary 

[Transmittal No. 06–54] 

36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification 

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense 

Security Cooperation Agency. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is 

publishing the unclassified text of a 

section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. 

This is published to fulfill the 

requirements of section 155 of Public 

Law 104–164 dated 21 July 1996. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

J. Hurd, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 604–

6575. 

The following is a copy of a letter to 

the Speaker of the House of 

Representatives, Transmittal 06–54 with 

attached transmittal, policy justification, 

Sensitivity of Technology, and Section 

620C(d). 

Dated: September 28, 2006. 

C.R. Choate, 

Alternate OSF Federal Register Liaison 

Officer, Department of Defense. 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–M 

mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 193 / Thursday, October 5, 2006 / Notices 58831 


mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with NOTICESEN05OC06.026</GPH>
58832 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 193 / Thursday, October 5, 2006 / Notices 


mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with NOTICESEN05OC06.027</GPH>
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 193 / Thursday, October 5, 2006 / Notices 58833 


mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with NOTICESEN05OC06.028</GPH>
58834 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 193 / Thursday, October 5, 2006 / Notices 


mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with NOTICESEN05OC06.029</GPH>
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 193 / Thursday, October 5, 2006 / Notices 58835 

[FR Doc. 06–8507 Filed 10–4–06; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–C 


mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with NOTICESEN05OC06.030</GPH>
# EUR-Lex - 12006E080 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12006E080

**Treaty establishing the European Community (consolidated version) - Part Three - Community policies - TITLE V - Transport - Article 80 **

*
Official Journal C 321 E , 29/12/2006 P. 0073 - 0073 Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0064 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0207 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0028 - Consolidated version (EEC Treaty - no official publication available) *

Article 80

1. The provisions of this title shall apply to transport by rail, road and inland waterway.

2. The Council may, acting by a qualified majority, decide whether, to what extent and by what procedure appropriate provisions may be laid down for sea and air transport.

The procedural provisions of Article 71 shall apply.

--------------------------------------------------
SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NINETY-EIGHTH CONGRESS 

Convened January 3, 1983 FIRST SESSION { 

SECOND SESSION { 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Wednesday, September 14, 1983 

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF WILLIAM F. HILDENBRAND, 

SECRETARY OF THE SENATE 

By Gerald A. Hackett, Executive Clerk 
MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION 

Mar 8, 1983- - Motion entered to reconsider the vote by which the resolution of 

rattficatton to the Montreal Protocols No. 3 and 4 (Ex. B., 95-1) was defeated--Mr. 

Baker. 
1 

TREATIES 

Calendar Treaty Subject Reported 

No. Doc. No. Bv 

1 EX. B, Montreal Aviation Protocols Nos. 3 and 4 Feb 10 83 Reported 

95-1 favorably, by Mr. Percy, 

Committee on Foreign 

Relations, with a proposed 

resolution of advice and 

consent to ratification 

with conditions (Printed 

rePOrt--Ex. Reot. 98-1) 
2 

NOMINATIONS PLACED ON THE SECRETARY'S DESK IN THE FOREIGN SERVI CE 

Foreign Service nornmatlons begmmng James E. Sarn, and endmg John F. Cannon, which 

nommatlons were received by the Senate and appeared m the Congressional Record of July 25, 1983
§ 251.35 Petersburg watershed. ( a ) Except as authorized in paragraphs (b) and (c), access to lands within the Petersburg watershed, Tongass National Forest, as described in the Act of October 17, 1940 (54 Stat. 1197), is prohibited.
( b ) Access to lands within the Petersburg watershed is hereby authorized, without further written approval, for the following routine purposes: ( 1 ) The discharge of official duties related to management of the Tongass National Forest by Federal employees, holders of Forest Service contracts, or Forest Service agents;
( 2 ) The operation, maintenance, and improvement of the municipal water system by Federal and State officials and employees of the city of Petersburg; and
( 3 ) Public recreational use of the Raven's Roost Trail for access to and from the Raven's Roost public recreation cabin and the Alpine Recreation Area.
( c ) Any person who wishes to enter upon the lands within the watershed for purposes other than those listed in paragraph (b) must obtain a permit that has been signed by the appropriate city official and countersigned by the District Ranger.
( d ) Unauthorized entrance upon lands within the watershed is subject to punishment as provided in 36 CFR 261.1b.
( e ) The Forest Supervisor of the Stikine Area of the Tongass National Forest may authorize the removal of timber from the watershed under the regulations governing disposal of National Forest timber (36 CFR part 223). In any removal of timber from the watershed, the Forest Supervisor shall provide adequate safeguards for the protection of the Petersburg municipal water supply.
[53 FR 26595, July 14, 1988]
§ 1236.12 What other records management and preservation considerations must be incorporated into the design, development, and implementation of electronic information systems? As part of the capital planning and systems development life cycle processes, agencies must ensure: ( a ) That records management controls (see § 1236.10) are planned and implemented in the system;
( b ) That all records in the system will be retrievable and usable for as long as needed to conduct agency business (i.e., for their NARA-approved retention period). Where the records will need to be retained beyond the planned life of the system, agencies must plan and budget for the migration of records and their associated metadata to new storage media or formats in order to avoid loss due to media decay or technology obsolescence. (See § 1236.14.)
( c ) The transfer of permanent records to NARA in accordance with part 1235 of this subchapter.
( d ) Provision of a standard interchange format (e.g., ASCII or XML) when needed to permit the exchange of electronic documents between offices using different software or operating systems.