Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 182 / Wednesday, September 20, 2006 / Proposed Rules 54943 

cracking of principal structural elements 

(PSEs). Compliance with these inspections is 

required by 14 CFR 91.403(c). For airplanes 

that have been previously modified, altered, 

or repaired in the areas addressed by these 

inspections, the operator may not be able to 

incorporate the inspections described in the 

revisions. In this situation, to comply with 14 

CFR 91.403(c), the operator must request 

approval for an alternative method of 

compliance according to paragraph (h) of this 

AD. The request should include a description 

of changes to the required inspections that 

will ensure the continued damage tolerance 

of the affected structure. The FAA has 

provided guidance for this determination in 

Advisory Circular (AC) 25–1529. 

Unsafe Condition 

(d) This AD results from a revised damage 

tolerance analysis. We are issuing this AD to 

detect and correct fatigue cracking of certain 

principal structural elements (PSEs), which 

could adversely affect the structural integrity 

of the airplane. 

Compliance 

(e) You are responsible for having the 

actions required by this AD performed within 

the compliance times specified, unless the 

actions have already been done. 

Revision of Airworthiness Limitations 

Section 

(f) Within 18 months after the effective 

date of this AD: Revise the Airworthiness 

Limitations section of the Instructions for 

Continued Airworthiness, Airworthiness 

Limitations Instructions (ALI), according to a 

method approved by the Manager, Los 

Angeles Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), 

FAA. Boeing MD–11 ALI, Report Number 

MDC–K5225, Revision 11, dated March 2006, 

is one approved method. 

(g) Except as provided by paragraph (h) of 

this AD: After the actions specified in 

paragraph (f) of this AD have been done, no 

alternative inspection intervals or 

replacement times may be approved for the 

PSEs and safe-life limited parts specified in 

Boeing Report Number MDC–K5225, 

Revision 11, dated March 2006. 

Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs) 

(h)(1) The Manager, Los Angeles ACO, has 

the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, 

if requested in accordance with the 

procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. 

(2) An AMOC that provides an acceptable 

level of safety may be used for any repair 

required by accomplishing the actions in this 

AD, if it is approved by an Authorized 

Representative for the Boeing Commercial 

Airplanes Delegation Option Authorization 

Organization who has been authorized by the 

Manager, Los Angeles ACO, to make those 

findings. For a repair method to be approved, 

the repair must meet the certification basis of 

the airplane, and the approval must 

specifically refer to this AD. 

(3) Before using any AMOC approved in 

accordance with § 39.19 on any airplane to 

which the AMOC applies, notify the 

appropriate principal inspector in the FAA 

Flight Standards Certificate Holding District 

Office. 

Issued in Renton, Washington, on 

September 12, 2006. 

Kevin M. Mullin, 

Acting Manager, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 06–7945 Filed 9–19–06; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 

Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade 

Bureau 

27 CFR Parts 4, 5, and 7 

[Notice No. 64; Re: Notice No. 62] 

RIN 1513–AB08 

Major Food Allergen Labeling for 

Wines, Distilled Spirits and Malt 

Beverages 

AGENCY: Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and 

Trade Bureau, Treasury. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking; 

extension of comment period. 

SUMMARY: In response to industry 

member requests, the Alcohol and 

Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau extends 

the comment period for Notice No. 62, 

Major Food Allergen Labeling for 

Wines, Distilled Spirits and Malt 

Beverages, a notice of proposed 

rulemaking published in the Federal 

Register on July 26, 2006, for an 

additional 90 days. 

DATES: Written comments must be 

received on or before December 26, 

2006. 

ADDRESSES: You may send comments to 

any of the following addresses—

• Director, Regulations and Rulings 

Division, Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and 

Trade Bureau, Attn: Notice No. 62, P.O. 

Box 14412, Washington, DC 20044–

4412. 

• 202–927–8525 (facsimile). 

• nprm@ttb.gov (e-mail). 

• http://www.ttb.gov/ 

regulations_laws/all_rulemaking.shtml. 

An online comment form is posted with 

this notice on our Web site. 

• http://www.regulations.gov. Federal 

e-rulemaking portal; follow instructions 

for submitting comments. 

You may view copies of this 

extension notice, Notice No. 62, the 

petitions, and any comments we receive 

by appointment at the TTB Information 

Resource Center, 1310 G Street, NW., 

Washington, DC 20220. To make an 

appointment, call 202–927–2400. You 

may also access copies of this extension 

notice, Notice No. 62, and the related 

comments online at http://www.ttb.gov/ 

regulations_laws/all_rulemaking.shtml. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lisa 

M. Gesser, Regulations and Rulings 

Division, Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and 

Trade Bureau, P.O. Box 128, Morganza, 

MD 20660; telephone (301) 290–1460. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On July 

26, 2006, the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax 

and Trade Bureau (TTB) published 

Notice No. 62, Major Food Allergen 

Labeling for Wines, Distilled Spirits and 

Malt Beverages, in the Federal Register 

(71 FR 42329). In that notice of 

proposed rulemaking, TTB requested 

public comment on the proposed 

adoption of mandatory labeling 

standards for major food allergens used 

in the production of alcohol beverages 

subject to the labeling requirements of 

the Federal Alcohol Administration Act. 

The comment period for Notice No. 62, 

when published, was scheduled to close 

on September 25, 2006. 

After publication of Notice No. 62, 

TTB received requests from the Distilled 

Spirits Council of the United States, the 

National Association of Beverage 

Importers, Inc., and Wine Institute to 

extend the comment period for Notice 

No. 62 for a period ranging from 60 to 

120 days beyond the September 25, 

2006, closing date. In support of their 

extension requests, these organizations 

note that the comment period of this 

notice would coincide with habitual 

August vacations in Europe, where 

many industry member suppliers reside, 

and that it would also coincide with the 

approaching grape harvest in California. 

Consequently, the three organizations 

state, many industry members would be 

unable to focus on the complexities and 

ramifications of the proposed rule and 

would not have adequate time to 

formulate a response to the proposal. 

In response to these requests, TTB 

extends the comment period for Notice 

No. 62 for an additional 90 days. 

Therefore, comments on Notice No. 62 

are now due on or before December 26, 

2006. 

Drafting Information: Gabriel J. Hiza 

of the Regulations and Rulings Division 

drafted this notice. 

Signed: September 14, 2006. 

John J. Manfreda, 

Administrator. 

[FR Doc. 06–7963 Filed 9–19–06; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4810–31–P 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSAL