alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
STANDARD PREFLIGHT CHECKLIST

GPS Locked

− Check that GPS is set (no flashing data, steady readout on both aircraft controller and video display.

Check Boot Altitude

− On system start up, confirm UAS altitude within 5 ft of actual altitude (flight controller and flight 

software).

Check Magnetic Compass

− Confirm Magnetic Compass is + or – 5 degrees of actual (flight controller and flight software).

Check Loss of Link Settings

− Verify LOL settings per mission plan and LOL setting behaviors. Ensure Rally waypoint for Loiter, or

Return to Home altitude is correct.

Check Waypoints

− Confirm waypoint data is correct for the planned mission (flight lines, altitudes, speeds, etc)

− Confirm Home and Autoland waypoints are correct.

Check Manual and Auto Flight Modes

− Ensure modes engage and are functioning properly.

Check Throttle 25%, 35%-100%. Check voltage is steady and proper level, before decreasing throttle.

− Signal readinessfor the motor to start and call “Clear Prop!”

− Ensure hands are away from the prop and signal readiness for motor by replying with “Prop Clear!”

− Power up UAS and throttle up to full power to 100%. Verify readings are at 100% and battery voltage is 

greater than 16 volts.

− Throttle back to zero until motor stops.

Video

− Verify cameras are clear, not canted or off-center and are working properly.

Check Elevator/Ailerons (back stick, forward stick/left stick, right stick) Right Joystick

− Verify elevator is functioning by moving the right joystick back (nose up) and forward (nose down), and 

verbally with “Nose Up” and “Nose Down”.

− Check Ailerons. Verify ailerons are functioning by moving right joystick left and right, and confirm verbally 

with “Left Roll” and “Right Roll.”
Check Rudder (back stick, forward stick/left stick, right stick) Left Joystick

− Verify rudder is functioning by moving the left joystick left (left rudder) and right (right rudder), and 

verbally with “Left Rudder” and “Right Rudder”.

Check Autoland

− Select Autoland check for button functionality.

− Deselect Autoland and verify Autoland is unselected.

Check Calibration

− Ensure UAS calibration and Electronic Speed Control (ESC) settings are confirmed.

Check Altitude

− Ensure altitude as not changed from initial startup and is within 5 feet of actual altitude.

Start Video

− Initiate cameras and sensorsif not wireless activation.
Exhibit 32.1



RENTECH, INC.



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Rentech, Inc., (the Company) on Form
10-K/A, Amendment No. 1, for the year ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, D. Hunt Ramsbottom, Chief Executive Officer, President and Director of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;



and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |                                                
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------
|Dated: January 30, 2006 |  | /s/ D. Hunt Ramsbottom                         
|                        |  | D. Hunt Ramsbottom,                            
|                        |  | Chief Executive Officer, President and Director



This certification is being furnished
solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, is not a part of the Form 10-K to which it refers, and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.
§ 1254.6 Do I need a researcher identification card to use archival materials at a NARA facility? ( a ) Yes, you need a researcher identification card to use original archival materials at a NARA facility. See §§ 1254.8 and 1254.10 for information on obtaining a card.
( b ) You also need a researcher identification card if you wish to use only microfilm copies of documents at NARA's Washington, DC, area facilities and in any NARA facility where the microfilm research room is not separate from the textual research room.
( c ) If you are using only microfilm copies of records in some regional archives where the microfilm research room is separate from the textual room, you do not need an identification card but you must register as described in § 1254.22.
[69 FR 39314, June 30, 2004, as amended at 75 FR 10415, Mar. 8, 2010]
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2


              [LETTERHEAD OF MILLER AND LENTS, LTD. APPEARS HERE]


                                March 30, 2000

Cross Timbers Oil Company
810 Houston Street, Suite 2000
Fort Worth, TX 76102

     Re:  Cross Timbers Oil Company
          1999 Annual Report on Form 10-K

Gentlemen:

     The firm of Miller and Lents, Ltd., consents to the use of its name and to
the use of its report dated March __, 2000, regarding the Cross Timbers Oil
Company Proved Reserves and Future Net Revenue as of January 1, 2000, in the
1999 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

     Miller and Lents, Ltd., has no interests in Cross Timbers Oil Company or in
any affiliated companies or subsidiaries and is not to receive any such interest
as payment for such reports and has no director, officer, or employee otherwise
connected with Cross Timbers Oil Company.  We are not employed by Cross Timbers
Oil Company on a contingent basis.

                              Yours very truly,

                              MILLER AND LENTS, LTD.


                              By     /s/ James C. Pearson
                                   ------------------------------
                                   James C. Pearson
                                   President
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 03123

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

x 03123\03123_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

03123\03123_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

03123\03123_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 03123\03123_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03123\03123_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03123\03123_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03123\03123_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03123\03123_Part E.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03123\03123_Part F.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03123\03123_Part G.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03123\03123_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

03123\Certification Statement Plant ID 03123.pdf Plant certification statement

x 03123\Follow up\03123_Email Correspondence.pdf Email communications regarding questions on the survey response

x 03123\Follow up\03123_Email Correspondence_Response.pdf Email communications regarding questions on the survey response

x 03123\Follow up\Beckjord Ash Deposition.xlsx Plant submitted survey file

x 03123\Follow up\Beckjord Plant ID 03123.docx Draft Questions for Follow Up

x 03123\Follow up\Part C Sect 2_1 Units 1 through 4.xlsx Plant submitted survey file

x 03123\Supplemental Documents\Beckjord A5-3 and D3-1 Rev1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 03123\Supplemental Documents\Beckjord F5-6 Pond and GW well locations.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

03123\Supplemental Documents\Diagram G3-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 03123\Supplemental Documents\WC Beckjord A5-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

03123\Supplemental Documents\CBI Substantiation\Duke Energy_EIP FOIA.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
§ 219.55 Objections set aside from review. ( a ) The reviewing officer shall set aside and not review an objection when one or more of the following applies: ( 1 ) Objections are not filed in a timely manner (§ 219.56);
( 2 ) The proposed plan, plan amendment, or plan revision is not subject to the objection procedures of this subpart pursuant to §§ 219.51 and 219.59;
( 3 ) The individual or entity did not submit substantive formal comments (§ 219.53) during opportunities for public comment on the proposed decision (§ 219.16(a)(1) and (a)(2));
( 4 ) None of the issues included in the objection is based on previously submitted substantive formal comments unless one or more of those issues arose after the opportunities for formal comment;
( 5 ) The objection does not provide sufficient information as required by § 219.54(c);
( 6 ) The objector withdraws the objection in writing;
( 7 ) The objector's identity is not provided or cannot be determined from the signature (written or electronically scanned), and a reasonable means of contact is not provided (§ 219.54(c)); or
( 8 ) The objection is illegible for any reason and a legible copy cannot easily be obtained.
( b ) When an objection includes an issue that is not based on previously submitted substantive formal comments and did not arise after the opportunities for formal comment, that issue will be set aside and not reviewed. Other issues raised in the objection that meet the requirements of this subpart will be reviewed.
( c ) The reviewing officer shall give written notice to the objector and the responsible official when an objection or part of an objection is set aside from review and shall state the reasons for not reviewing the objection in whole or part. If the objection is set aside from review for reasons of illegibility or lack of a means of contact, the reasons must be documented in the planning record.
October 25 , 2017



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

IN THE INTEREST OF J .E.M.M . & L.A.M.M., CHILDREN

NO. 14

- 17

- 00355

- CV

________________________________ This cause, an a ppeal from a judgment terminating parental rights signed April 13, 2017, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find error in the judgment. W e find the trial court erred in terminating M.L.M.

- F.’s parental rights to J.E.M.M. and L.A.M.M. We therefore order that the portions of the judgment terminating M.L.M.

- F.’s parental rights to J.E.M.M. and L.A.M.M. are REVERSED and we RENDER judgment denyi ng the Department of Family and Protective Services request to terminate M.L.M.

- F.’s parental rights to J.E.M.M. and L.A.M.M. Further, we find no error in the remainder of the judgment and order it AFFIRMED.
We further order this decision certified below for observance. We further order that mandate be issued immediately.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsCVD Diamond, DLC, and c-BN Coatings for Solid Film LubricationWhen the main criteria for judging coating performance were coefficient of friction and wear rate, which had to be less than 0.1 and 10(exp -6) mm(exp 3)/N-m, respectively, carbon- and nitrogen-ion-implanted, fine-grain CVD diamond and DLC ion beam deposited on fine-grain CVD diamond met the requirements regardless of environment (vacuum, nitrogen, and air).Document ID19980174928Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeReprint (Version printed in journal)AuthorsMiyoshi, Kazuhisa*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateApril 1, 1998Subject CategoryNonmetallic MaterialsReport/Patent NumberE-10693NASA/TM-97-206314NAS 1.15:206314Meeting InformationMeeting: 1997 Joint Summer MeetingLocation: Evanston, ILCountry: United StatesStart Date: June 29, 1997End Date: July 2, 1997Sponsors:Society for Experimental Stress Analysis,American Society of Agricultural Engineers,American Society of Mechanical EngineersFunding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 523-22-13Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19980174928.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 98 (Thursday, May 21, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29379-29380]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-12482]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 9140]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Power and Pathos: Bronze Sculpture of the Hellenistic 
World'' and ``Pergamon and the Art of the Hellenistic Kingdom'' 
Exhibitions

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 
of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 
257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibitions ``Power and Pathos: Bronze Sculpture of the 
Hellenistic World'' and ``Pergamon and the Art of the Hellenistic 
Kingdom,'' imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the 
United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported 
pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I 
also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at 
the J. Paul Getty Museum, Los Angeles, California, from on or about 
July 28, 2015, until on or about November 1, 2015, at the National 
Gallery of Art, Washington, DC, from on or about

[[Page 29380]]

December 6, 2015, until on or about March 20, 2016, at The Metropolitan 
Museum of Art, New York, New York, from on or about April 11, 2016, 
until on or about July 10, 2016, and at possible additional exhibitions 
or venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. I have 
ordered that Public Notice of these Determinations be published in the 
Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including 
lists of the exhibit objects, contact the Office of Public Diplomacy 
and Public Affairs in the Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department 
of State (telephone: 202-632-6471; email: section2459@state.gov). The 
mailing address is U.S. Department of State, L/PD, SA-5, Suite 5H03, 
Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: May 18, 2015.
Kelly Keiderling,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2015-12482 Filed 5-20-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
Exhibit 14.1








CODE OF ETHICS FOR FINANCIAL OFFICERS


EVERFLOW MANAGEMENT CORPORATION





This Code of Ethics applies to the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (“Financial Officers”) of Everflow Management Corporation in connection with its role as managing general partner of Everflow Eastern Partners, L.P. (“the Company”).  Its purpose is to promote honest and ethical conduct and compliance with the law, particularly as related to the maintenance of the Company’s financial records and the preparation of financial statements filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).  To the best of their knowledge and ability, Financial Officers are expected to:





1.           Act with honesty and integrity, avoiding actual or apparent conflicts of interest in personal or professional relationships.





2.           Work to ensure full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable disclosure in reports and documents that the Company files with, or submits to, governmental agencies, including the SEC, and in other public communications.





3.           Comply with rules and regulations of federal, state and local governments, and other appropriate private and public regulatory agencies.





4.           Act in good faith, responsibly, with due care, competence and diligence, without misrepresenting material facts or allowing their independent judgment to be subordinated.





5.           Respect the confidentiality of information acquired in the course of their work except when authorized or otherwise legally obligated to disclose, and ensure that confidential information acquired in the course of their work is not used by them for personal advantage.





6.           Share knowledge and maintain skills important and relevant to their constituents’ needs.





7.           Proactively promote ethical behavior as a responsible partner among peers in their work environment.





Financial Officers who violate or attempt to violate this Code of Ethics may be subject to disciplinary action up to and including termination, and depending on the nature of the violation, may expose the Company and/or themselves to both civil and/or criminal liabilities and penalties.





This Code of Ethics is a statement of certain fundamental principles, policies and procedures that govern Financial Officers in the conduct of the Company’s business.  It is not intended to and does not create any rights in any employee, customer, client, supplier, competitor, shareholder or any other person or entity.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, David J. Rooke, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Regma Bio Technologies Limited:;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report.

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Dated this 19th day of August, 2003.



| | /s/ David J. Rooke
David J. Rooke
Principal Executive Officer
| | -------------------------------------------------------------
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT

CENTER FOR INTEGRATED NANOTECHNOLOGIES AT SANDIA NATIONAL LABORATORIES/NEW MEXICO

The United States Department of Energy (DOE), National Nuclear Security Administration, Sandia Site Office, has prepared an environmental assessment (EA) for the Center for Integrated Nanotechnologies (CINT) at Sandia National Laboratories, New Mexico (SNL/NM). The EA analyzes the potential effects of a proposal to construct and operate a CINT Core Facility and establish a Gateway to Sandia Facility. The CINT Core Facility would be constructed on a 20-acre DOE-owned parcel of land on the west side of Eubank Boulevard, north of the entrance to Kirtland Air Force Base. The Gateway to Sandia Facility would be established in existing space within the existing Integrated Material Research Laboratory (IMRL) located with SNL/NM’s Technical Area I. The CINT Core Facility would be a single story structure containing about 90,000 square feet. It would include clean rooms for nanofabrication, characterization, and lithography, as well as laboratories for general-purpose chemistry, biology, electronic, and physical measurement activities. No construction or renovation would be required to establish the CINT Gateway to Sandia Facilities within the IMRL. The EA analyzes effects on health, safety, water use and liquid eftluents, air quality, waste management, and Environmental Justice resulting from these activities and operations and associated cumulative effects. A detailed description of the proposed action and its environmental consequences is presented in the EA.

Based on the analysis presented in the EA and consideration of comments from interested stakeholders, the DOE finds that there would be no significant impacts associated with the proposed action. DOE makes this Finding of No Significant Impact pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), the Council on Environmental Quality implementing regulations (40 CFR 1500), and the DOE NEPA regulations (10 CFR 102 1). The proposed action does not constitute a major federal action that would significantly affect the human environment within the mandate of NEPA. Therefore, no environmental impact statement is required for this proposal.

Signed in Albuquerque, New Mexico this ,2003. 7 day of-&l’ 1

Manager Sandia Site Office