alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 11:33 AM

To: Undisclosed recipients

Subject: Email to interested parties: MWOs SNOPR info

To whom it may be of interest:

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) will hold a public meeting on Wednesday, 

March 14, 2012, to discuss and receive comments on the Energy Conservation 

Standards for Standby and Off Mode for Microwave Ovens- Supplemental Notice 

of Proposed Rulemaking, Federal Register notice (Vol. 77, No. 30, published on 

February 14, 2012).

[RIN 1904–AC07, Docket No. EERE–2011–BT–STD–0048]

At the public meeting, DOE will be presenting, for public comment and 

discussion, the following: the analytical framework, models, and tools that DOE is 

using to evaluate standby and off mode standards for this equipment; the results 

of the analyses performed by DOE for this equipment; the potential energy 

conservation standard levels derived from these analyses that DOE could 

consider for this equipment; and any other issues relevant to the development of 

energy conservation standards for microwave ovens.

Please find attached the following presentation documents:

• Office of the Federal Register notice

• Public Meeting Agenda 03/14/2012

• Public Meeting Presentation

If you cannot make the meeting in person, DOE will also simulcast a webinar 

whereby you can participate from anywhere there is an adequate internet 

connection.

Webinar Information:

Energy Conservation Standards for 

Microwave Ovens to Address Standby 

Mode and Off Mode Energy Use (RIN: 

1904-AC07)

Join us for a Webinar on March 14
Space is limited.

Reserve your Webinar seat now at:

https://www1.gotomeeting.com/register/507099585

Energy Conservation Standards for Microwave Ovens to Address Standby Mode and Off Mode Energy Use 

(RIN: 1904-AC07)

Title: Energy Conservation Standards for Microwave Ovens to Address Standby Mode and Off Mode Energy 

Use (RIN: 1904-AC07)

Date: Wednesday, March 14, 2012

Time: 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM EDT

After registering you will receive a confirmation email containing information about joining the Webinar.

System Requirements

PC-based attendees

Required: Windows® 7, Vista, XP or 2003 Server

Macintosh®-based attendees

Required: Mac OS® X 10.5 or newer

Regards,

Wes Anderson

Mechanical Engineer

Building Technologies Program

Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy

U. S. Department of Energy

202-586-7335
§ 261.16 Developed recreation sites. The following are prohibited: ( a ) Occupying any portion of the site for other than recreation purposes.
( b ) Building, attending, maintaining, or using a fire outside of a fire ring provided by the Forest Service for such purpose or outside of a stove, grill or fireplace.
( c ) Cleaning or washing any personal property, fish, animal, or food, or bathing or washing at a hydrant or water faucet not provided for that purpose.
( d ) Discharging or igniting a firecracker, rocket or other firework, or explosive.
( e ) Occupying between 10 p.m. and 6 a.m. a place designated for day use only.
( f ) Failing to remove all camping equipment or personal property when vacating the area or site.
( g ) Placing, maintaining, or using camping equipment except in a place specifically designated or provided for such equipment.
( h ) Without permission, failing to have at least one person occupy a camping area during the first night after camping equipment has been set up.
( i ) Leaving camping equipment unattended for more than 24 hours without permission.
( j ) Bringing in or possessing an animal, other than a service animal, unless it is crated, caged, or upon a leash not longer than six feet, or otherwise under physical restrictive control.
( k ) Bringing in or possessing in a swimming area an animal, other than a service animal.
( l ) Bringing in or possessing a saddle, pack, or draft animal except as authorized by posted instructions.
( m ) Operating or parking a motor vehicle or trailer except in places developed or designated for this purpose.
( n ) Operating a bicycle, motorbike, or motorcycle on a trail unless designated for this use.
( o ) Operating a motorbike, motorcycle, or other motor vehicle for any purpose other than entering or leaving the site.
( p ) Depositing any body waste except into receptacles provided for that purpose.
[42 FR 2957, Jan. 14, 1977, as amended at 46 FR 33520, June 30, 1981; 49 FR 25450, June 21, 1984; 60 FR 45295, Aug. 30, 1995. Redesignated at 70 FR 68291, Nov. 9, 2005; 76 FR 58404, Sept. 21, 2011]
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

November 21, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-40793

Summary Calendar

 

BRANDON C. SAMPLE, and on behalf of all similarly

situated federal prisoners in the United States and its

territories,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS,

Defendant-Appellee.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. C-02-CV-265

--------------------

Before BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

 Brandon Sample, federal prisoner # 33949-037, appeals the

district court’s dismissal of his civil rights and Administrative

Procedures Act (APA) action for failure to state a claim under 28

U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). Sample filed suit against the Bureau

of Prisons (BOP) to declare its promulgation and enforcement of

the Inmate Financial Responsibility Program (IFRP) as exceeding

the scope of its authority, and he sought to enjoin the BOP’s
No. 03-40793

-2-

enforcement of the IFRP against him and similarly situated

prisoners. Sample was convicted of numerous counts of mail and

securities fraud and, in addition to an imprisonment term, was

sentenced to pay $275,000 in restitution and $1800 in special

assessment. 

Sample argues that the district court did not review his

claim under the APA and that he is not raising a challenge to his

sentence but, rather, a challenge to the BOP’s authority to

promulgate and apply the IFRP. 

We review a 28 U.S.C. § 1915 dismissal for failure to state

a claim under the same de novo standard of review applicable to

dismissals made pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 12(b)(6). Harris v.

Hegmann, 198 F.3d 153, 156 (5th Cir. 1999). We must determine

if, taking Sample's allegations as true, no relief could be

granted based on those allegations. Id.

A favorable ruling in Sample’s instant case would thwart the

effectiveness of his sentence. There has been no determination

that Sample’s sentence is invalid. His district court complaint

is thus barred by Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 486-87 (1994). 

The dismissal of his complaint for failure to state a claim is

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Salon Media Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the “Report”), I, Norman Blashka, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Norman
      BlashkaNovember 14,
      2008
              Norman
      Blashka
                  Chief
      Financial Officer
Case 16-27264 Doc 1 Filed 08/25/16 Entered 08/25/16 10:20:58 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 9
Case 16-27264 Doc 1 Filed 08/25/16 Entered 08/25/16 10:20:58 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 9
Case 16-27264 Doc 1 Filed 08/25/16 Entered 08/25/16 10:20:58 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 9
Case 16-27264 Doc 1 Filed 08/25/16 Entered 08/25/16 10:20:58 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 9
Case 16-27264 Doc 1 Filed 08/25/16 Entered 08/25/16 10:20:58 Desc Main

 Document Page 5 of 9
Case 16-27264 Doc 1 Filed 08/25/16 Entered 08/25/16 10:20:58 Desc Main

 Document Page 6 of 9
Case 16-27264 Doc 1 Filed 08/25/16 Entered 08/25/16 10:20:58 Desc Main

 Document Page 7 of 9
Case 16-27264 Doc 1 Filed 08/25/16 Entered 08/25/16 10:20:58 Desc Main

 Document Page 8 of 9
Case 16-27264 Doc 1 Filed 08/25/16 Entered 08/25/16 10:20:58 Desc Main

 Document Page 9 of 9
EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 11
August 23, 2006

INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT

Case Number: P060702 Assessor: Wormell

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES

Scenario#: Number of Release Sites: 

Release Activity:

Release Description: WATER LANDFILL INCINER LAND/INCIN FUGITIVE

Total Releases:

(kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr)

Per Site Release:

(kg/day) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/day)

Remarks:

Consumer use expected? No, consumer use is not expected.

Parameter Exp Based Persistent Exceedance value

Drinking (Surface) Water Dose (mg/kg/day)

Fish Ingestion Dose (mg/kg/day)

Inhalation Dose (mg/kg/day)

Groundwater Dose (mg/kg/day)

Surface Water Release after treatment (kg/yr)

Total Release After Treatment (kg/yr)

Consumer Exposure Dose?

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 11
INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT

Case Number: Assessor: Wormell

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES

Scenario#: Number of Release Sites: 

Release Activity: Proc

Release Description: WATER LANDFILL INCINER LAND/INCIN FUGITIVE

Total Releases:

(kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr)

Per Site Release:

(kg/day) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/day)

Remarks:

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 11
INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT

EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 11
INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT

EPA SANITIZED Page 5 of 11
INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT

Case Number: Assessor: Wormell

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES

Scenario#: Number of Release Sites: 

Release Activity:

Release Description: WATER LANDFILL INCINER LAND/INCIN FUGITIVE

Total Releases:

(kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr)

Per Site Release:

(kg/day) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/day)

Remarks:

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 6 of 11
INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT

EPA SANITIZED Page 7 of 11
INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT

EPA SANITIZED Page 8 of 11
INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT

Case Number: Assessor: Wormell

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES

Scenario#: Number of Release Sites: 

Release Activity:

Release Description: WATER LANDFILL INCINER LAND/INCIN FUGITIVE

Total Releases:

(kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr)

Per Site Release:

(kg/day) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/day)

Remarks:

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 9 of 11
INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT

EPA SANITIZED Page 10 of 11
INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT

EPA SANITIZED Page 11 of 11
# EUR-Lex - 12008E339 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008E339

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - PART SEVEN: GENERAL AND FINAL PROVISIONS - Article 339 (ex Article 287 TEC) **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0193 - 0193 *

Article 339

(ex Article 287 TEC)

The members of the institutions of the Union, the members of committees, and the officials and other servants of the Union shall be required, even after their duties have ceased, not to disclose information of the kind covered by the obligation of professional secrecy, in particular information about undertakings, their business relations or their cost components.

--------------------------------------------------
#### § 13.956 What types of snowmachines are allowed?

The types of snowmachines allowed are defined in § 13.1 under “snowmachine or snowmobile”.
# EUR-Lex - 12004V050 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V050

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART I - TITLE VI — THE DEMOCRATIC LIFE OF THE UNION - Article I-50 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0035 - 0035 *

Article I-50

Transparency of the proceedings of Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies

1. In order to promote good governance and ensure the participation of civil society, the Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies shall conduct their work as openly as possible.

2. The European Parliament shall meet in public, as shall the Council when considering and voting on a draft legislative act.

3. Any citizen of the Union, and any natural or legal person residing or having its registered office in a Member State shall have, under the conditions laid down in Part III, a right of access to documents of the Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies, whatever their medium.

European laws shall lay down the general principles and limits which, on grounds of public or private interest, govern the right of access to such documents.

4. Each institution, body, office or agency shall determine in its own rules of procedure specific provisions regarding access to its documents, in accordance with the European laws referred to in paragraph 3.

--------------------------------------------------
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 02972**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  02972\02972_Certification Statement.pdf Plant certification statement 

### x 02972\02972_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

02972\02972_Completeness Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 02972\02972_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted 

### x 02972\02972_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file 

### x 02972\02972_Part E.xls Plant submitted survey file 

### x 02972\02972_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

02972\Supporting Documents\MA_A5-2 Maps.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### x 02972\Supporting Documents\MA_A5-3_Water Balance.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database
. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
|   | (1) | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/ Christopher      J.      Floyd                |   |   |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| Christopher      J. FloydChief      Financial OfficerFebruary      15, 2008                                                       |   |   |   |
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

August 29, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver 130718(58) Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, SHANNON GALINDO, as Personal Justices Representative of the Estate of SANDRA DAY, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 130718 COA: 256489 Muskegon CC: 03-042622-CH LAVERNE J. MOLITOR and DIANE C. MOLITOR, Defendants-Appellants.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for rec onsideration of this Co urt’s order of June 21, 2006 is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.

W EAVER , J., would grant reconsideration a nd, on reconsideration, would grant leave to appeal.

d0821 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

August 29, 2006

Clerk
Case 16-30391 Doc 1 Filed 09/23/16 Entered 09/23/16 15:41:21 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 9
Case 16-30391 Doc 1 Filed 09/23/16 Entered 09/23/16 15:41:21 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 9
Case 16-30391 Doc 1 Filed 09/23/16 Entered 09/23/16 15:41:21 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 9
Case 16-30391 Doc 1 Filed 09/23/16 Entered 09/23/16 15:41:21 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 9
Case 16-30391 Doc 1 Filed 09/23/16 Entered 09/23/16 15:41:21 Desc Main

 Document Page 5 of 9
Case 16-30391 Doc 1 Filed 09/23/16 Entered 09/23/16 15:41:21 Desc Main

 Document Page 6 of 9
Case 16-30391 Doc 1 Filed 09/23/16 Entered 09/23/16 15:41:21 Desc Main

 Document Page 7 of 9
Case 16-30391 Doc 1 Filed 09/23/16 Entered 09/23/16 15:41:21 Desc Main

 Document Page 8 of 9
Case 16-30391 Doc 1 Filed 09/23/16 Entered 09/23/16 15:41:21 Desc Main

 Document Page 9 of 9
§ 1280.18 Gambling. ( a ) You may not participate in any type of gambling while on or in NARA property or facilities. This includes: ( 1 ) Participating in games for money or other personal property;
( 2 ) Operating gambling devices;
( 3 ) Conducting a lottery or pool; or
( 4 ) Selling or purchasing numbers tickets.
( b ) This rule does not apply to licensed blind operators of vending facilities who are selling chances for any lottery set forth in a state law and conducted by an agency of a state as authorized by section 2(a)(5) of the Randolph-Sheppard Act (20 U.S.C. 107, *et seq.*)
Exhibit 32.2   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of America West Resources, Inc. (the Company),  hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the twelve months ended December 31, 2011 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result s of operations of the Company.   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by it and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  Date:  May 16, 2012By:/s/ Brent M. DaviesBrent M. DaviesChief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
EXECUTIVE 

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF EMERY L. FRAZIER, SECRETARY OF THE SENATE 

BY LARRY M. WHEELER, EXECUTIVE CLERK 

Tuesday, June 21, 1966 

UNANIMOUS-CONSENT AGREEMENT 

Ordered, That the Senate proceed to vote on Executives B, C, H, and D of the 89th Congress at 12:20 

o'clock June 21, 1966, which treaties are presently on the Executive Calendar; that the treaties be considered 

en bloc, as if in executive session; and that the votes thereon appear in the Congressional Record separately, 

as if the treaties were voted upon individually. 

Date of Calendar Treaty No. report No. 

1985 

June 29 

Aug. 3 

1966 

June 17 

17 

17 

2 Ex. H (86th Gong., 

1st sess.). 

3 

2 

3 

4 

Ex. D (88th Cong., 

2d sess.). 

Ex. B (89th Cong., 

2d sess.). 

Ex. C (89th Cong., 

2d sess.). 

Ex. H (89th Cong., 

1st sess.). 

TREATIES 

Subject Action of committee 

Hague Protocol to Warsaw Convention,___ Reported favorably by 

Mr. Fulbright from 

the Committee on 

Foreign Relations, 

with a printed report. 

(See Ex. Rept. No.3, 

Consular Convention With the Soviet 

Union. 

Supplementary income-tax convention with 

the Netherlands. 

Supplementary tax protocol with the United 

Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern 

Ireland. 

Amendments to the Convention of the 

Intergovernmental Maritime Consultative Organization. 

89th Cong., 1st sesa.) 

Reported favorably by 

Mr. Fulbright from 

the Committee on 

Foreign Relations, 

with a printed report. 

(See Ex. Rept. No. 4, 

89th Cong., 1st sess.) 

Minority views filed 

Aug. 5, 1965. (See 

Ex. Rept. No. 4, p. 2, 

89th Cong., 1st sess.) 

Reported favorably by 

Mr. Gore from the 

Committee on Foreign 

Relations, with a 

printed report. (See 

Ex. Rept. No. 3, 89th 

Cong., 2d sess.) 

Reported favorably by 

Mr. Gore from the 

Committee on Foreign 

Relations, with a 

printed report. (See 

Ex. Rept. No. 3, 89th 

Cong., 2d sess.) 

Reported favorably by 

Mr. Fulbright from 

the . Committee on 

Foreign Relations, 

with a printed report. 

(See Ex. Rept. No. 4, 

89th Cong., 2d sess.) 
2 

Date of Oal®dar .. ' t ~ 

I Subject Action of committee report No.,. Treatv No. 

----r:-, 

1966 

June 17 5 Ex. D (89th Cong., Protocol to Mexican broadcasting agree- Reported favorably by 

2d sess.). ment. Mr; Fulbright .from ( 

the Committee on 

Fore.ign Relations, 1 a prmted report. ( ~ ·. 

Ex. Rept. No. 5, 8 , · 

Cong., 2d sess.) 

,,
#### § 3.1 What is the applicability and scope of this part?

The applicability of the regulations in this part is described in § 1 .2 of this chapter.
1

The Honorable Laurie Smith Camp, United States District Judge for the

District of Nebraska.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 09-3310

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of Nebraska.

Vincent A. Caulfield, * 

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: April 21, 2010

Filed: April 26, 2010

___________

Before WOLLMAN, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Vincent Caulfield pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm, in

violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), and to being subject to forfeiture of firearms. The

district court1

 sentenced him within the applicable advisory Guidelines range to 57

months in prison and 3 years of supervised release. On appeal, his counsel has filed

a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), in which he requests leave

to withdraw and argues that the court should have imposed a shorter sentence, and
-2-

should have ordered that the sentence run concurrently with the sentence the court

imposed in a separate case involving Caulfield’s violation of supervised release terms.

We conclude that the district court committed no procedural or substantive error

in sentencing Caulfield. See United States v. Feemster, 572 F.3d 455, 461 (8th Cir.

2009) (en banc) (standards for reviewing sentence). In particular, we conclude that

it was not unreasonable for the district court to order that the sentence imposed in the

instant case was to run consecutively to the sentence imposed in the case involving his

supervised release. See U.S.S.G. § 7B1.3, comment. (n.4) (it is Commission’s

recommendation that any sentence of imprisonment for criminal offense that is

imposed after revocation of supervised release be run consecutively to any term of

imprisonment imposed upon revocation); see also United States v. Lee, 545 F.3d 678,

680 (8th Cir. 2008) (per curiam) (with limited exception, district court’s decision to

impose consecutive or concurrent sentence is reviewed only for reasonableness), cert.

denied, 129 S. Ct. 2758 (2009).

Having reviewed the record independently under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75,

80 (1988), we have found no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, we affirm

the district court’s judgment, and we grant counsel’s request to withdraw. 

______________________________
#### § 1256.94 Definition.

For the purposes of this subpart, “Audiovisual records” mean motion picture films, videotapes, and sound recordings, and other materials regardless of physical form or characteristics that were prepared for dissemination abroad.