alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 294.40 Purpose.

The purpose of this subpart is to provide, within the context of multiple use management, State-specific direction for the protection of roadless areas on National Forest System lands in Colorado. The intent of this regulation is to protect roadless values by restricting tree cutting, sale, and removal; road construction and reconstruction; and linear construction zones within Colorado Roadless Areas (CRAs), with narrowly focused exceptions. Activities must be designed to conserve the roadless area characteristics listed in § 294.41, although applying the exceptions in § 294.42, § 294.43, and § 294.44 may have effects to some roadless area characteristics.
BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

In the Matter of: 

James C. Thomas, lit MUR6920 

^-SECONDfCONSENT TO EXTEND TIME 

TO mSTITUTE A CIVIL ENFORCEMENT ACTION 

As consideration for the. Federal Election Commission's agreement to consider 

Respondent's request that the Commission authorize pre-probable cause to believe conciliation 

in this matter, the captioned parties hereby consent to toll the statute of limitations for any civil 

. enforcement action that the Federal Election Commission might institute in comiection with 

MUR 6920, pursuant to 52;U.S.C. § 30109(ia)(6), for sixty (60) calendar days from August 17 to 

October 16, 2017. p^his agreement is in addition to Respondent's prior agreement to toll tite / 

^(-3ianjte^Ht!Tmations4o<^-ft^n (15) dnys-j 

These agreements thereby extend the time to institute a civil law enforcement action to 

seventy.-five (75) calendar days from the expiration of the five-year statute of limitations found at 

28 U.S.C. § 2462 or of any other statutes of limitations or repose that may be applicable. 

Any further extensions of the tirne to institute a civil enforcement action will require the 

written consent of the Respondent. 

Dated: | _7 

Langhofer, Counsel to James C. Thomas. ///
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                        PURSUANT TO 18U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ace Marketing & Promotions, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Dean L. Julia, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



          /S/ DEAN L. JULIA
          ---------------------
          DEAN L. JULIA
          CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
          NOVEMBER 3, 2005
Exhibit 32
                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection with the Annual Report of AEI Net Lease  Income  &
Growth  Fund XIX Limited Partnership (the "Partnership") on  Form
10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2006, as filed with  the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission on  the  date  hereof  (the
"Report"), the undersigned, Robert P. Johnson, President  of  AEI
Fund  Management XIX, Inc., the Managing General Partner  of  the
Partnership, and Patrick W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer of AEI
Fund  Management XIX, Inc., each certify, pursuant to  18  U.S.C.
1350,  as  adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The  Report  fully  complies with the  requirements  of
          Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act
          of 1934; and

     2.   The   information  contained  in  the   Report   fairly
          presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial
          condition and results of operations of the Partnership.


                          /s/ Robert P Johnson
                              Robert P. Johnson, President
                              AEI Fund Management XIX, Inc.
                              Managing General Partner
                              March 23, 2007


                          /s/ Patrick W Keene
                              Patrick W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer
                              AEI Fund Management XIX, Inc.
                              Managing General Partner
                              March 23, 2007
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 190 (Monday, October 2, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 57929]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-8394]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Defense Science Board

AGENCY: Department of Defense.

ACTION: Notice of Advisory Committee Meetings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Science Board Task Force on Defense Industrial 
Structure for Transformation will meet in closed session on December 11 
and, 2006; January 4 and 5, 2007; February 21 and 22, 2007; March 28 
and 29, 2007; April 19 and 20, 2007; May 23 and 24, 2007; and June 12 
and 13, 2007 at Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC), 
4001 N. Fairfax Drive, Arlington, VA. These meetings will characterize 
the degree of changed needed in industry due to the changing nature of 
DoD and the industrial base. The meetings will also examine the 
effectiveness of existing mitigation measures and make recommendations 
to ensure future competition and innovation throughout all tiers of the 
defense industrial base. The briefings will contain proprietary 
material from the private business sector.
    The mission of the Defense Science Board is to advise the Secretary 
of Defense and the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, 
Technology & Logistics on scientific and technical matters as they 
affect the perceived needs of the Department of Defense. At these 
meetings, the Defense Science Board Task Force will: Describe the 
defense industry required to cope with the international security 
environment in the 21st century. Additionally the task force will 
address the implications for the industrial base of increased DoD 
acquisition of services, as well as the implications for the financial 
viability of the defense industrial base as the sector adapts to 
changing DoD needs for defense-related products and services.
    In accordance with Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act, Pub. L. No. 92-463, as amended (5 U.S.C. App. II), it has been 
determined that these Defense Science Board Task Force meetings concern 
matters listed in 5 U.S.C. Sec.  552b(c)(4) and that, accordingly, the 
meetings will be closed to the public.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Maj Chad Lominac, USAF, Defense 
Science Board, 3140 Defense Pentagon, Room 3C553, Washington, DC 20301-
3140, via e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ed8e858c9f81889ec381828084838c8ead829e89c3808481"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ea89828b98868f99c486858783848b89aa85998ec4878386">[email protected]</span></a>, or via phone at (703) 571-
0081.

    Dated: September 26, 2006.
C.R. Choate,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 06-8394 Filed 9-29-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
§ 1254.60 What are NARA's copying services? ( a ) You may order copies of many of our documents for a fee. Our fee schedule for copies is located in § 1258.12 of this chapter. Exceptions to the fee schedule are located in § 1258.4. See § 1258.6 about reproductions NARA may provide without charging a fee.
( b ) For preservation reasons, we do not make copies from the original documents if the documents are available on microfilm and a clear copy (electrostatic, photographic, or microfilm) can be made from the microfilm.
# EUR-Lex - 12008E/PRO/17 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008E/PRO/17

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - PROTOCOLS - Protocol (No 17) on Denmark **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0288 - 0288 *

PROTOCOL (No 17)

ON DENMARK

THE HIGH CONTRACTING PARTIES,

DESIRING to settle certain particular problems relating to Denmark,

HAVE AGREED upon the following provisions, which shall be annexed to the Treaty establishing the European Community:

The provisions of Article 14 of the Protocol on the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank shall not affect the right of the National Bank of Denmark to carry out its existing tasks concerning those parts of the Kingdom of Denmark which are not part of the Community.

--------------------------------------------------
In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07-15-00221-CV 

SAAHIR JEHAAD ABDALLAH, APPELLANT 

 

V. 

 

JIM HOLMES, ET AL., APPELLEE 

 

On Appeal from the 237th District Court 

Lubbock County, Texas 

Trial Court No. 2014-511,655, Honorable Leslie Hatch, Presiding 

 

July 14, 2015 

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

 

Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ. 

Appellant Saahir Jehaad Abdahllah attempts to appeal a court order striking his 

petition and dismissing the lawsuit he filed against appellees. The order was signed on 

April 21, 2015. Appellant’s notice of appeal was filed with the district clerk on June 5, 

2015. We dismiss this appeal because of appellant’s failure to comply with the Court’s 

order requiring a written explanation for his late notice of appeal. TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c). 

Appellant’s notice of appeal was due on May 21, 2015. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1. 

Appellant filed a notice of appeal on June 5, 2015, but did not file a motion requesting 
2

an extension of time to file the notice of appeal. Under Texas Rule of Appellate 

Procedure 26.3, the Court may extend the time to file a notice of appeal if, within 15 

days after the deadline expires, the appellant files the notice of appeal along with a 

motion requesting an extension that reasonably explains the need for an extension. See 

TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3 & 10.5(b). Although a motion for extension is implied when the 

appellant tenders a notice of appeal within 15 days after the notice deadline, it is still 

necessary for the appellant to reasonably explain the need for an extension. See 

Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997); Jones v. City of Houston, 976 

S.W.2d 676, 677 (Tex. 1998). 

Because appellant filed a notice of appeal within 15 days after the deadline, a 

motion for extension was implied. However, the Court ordered appellant to file a written 

response by June 26, 2015 explaining why the notice of appeal was filed late. The 

Court also informed appellant that the failure to comply with the Court’s directive would 

result in dismissal of the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3. Although appellant has filed 

various motions, appellant did not respond to the Court’s directive for an explanation. 

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 

42.3(c) because appellant failed to comply with a court order requiring a response within 

a specified time. Of course, appellant has 15 days to file a motion for rehearing wherein 

he may comply with the Court’s previous directive for an explanation. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 49.1. 

Per Curiam
Case 16-28735 Doc 9 Filed 09/13/16 Entered 09/14/16 09:37:48 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
#### Charles A. Pope, Plaintiff, *v.*August Heckscher, Appellant, and Freeman C. Goffe, Respondent, Impleaded with Others.

*Pope*v. *Heckscher,*109 App. Div. 495, affirmed.

(Submitted October 23, 1907;

decided November 19, 1907.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered January 20, 1906, which reversed a judgment of Special Term dismissing the counterclaim of the respondent herein and granted a new trial in an action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien.

*Charles Oakes*for appellant.

*Charles P. Northrop*for respondent.

*509Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered against appellant on the stipulation, with costs in all courts; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Cli. J., Okay, O’Brien, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 182 (Wednesday, September 20, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 54990]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-7962]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Notices

Date and Time: September 26, 2006 at 10 a.m.

Place: 999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC.

Status: This meeting will be closed to the public.

Items to be Discussed: Compliance matters pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g. 
Audits conducted pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g, 438(b), and Title 26, 
U.S.C. Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings 
or arbitration. Internal personnel rules and procedures or matters 
affecting a particular employee.

Person to Contact for Information: Mr. Robert Biersack, Press Officer, 
Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Mary W. Dove,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 06-7962 Filed 9-8-06; 3:05 pm]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
58824 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 193 / Thursday, October 5, 2006 / Notices 

[FR Doc. 06–8505 Filed 10–4–06; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–C 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Office of the Secretary 

[Transmittal No. 06–64] 

36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification 

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense 

Security Cooperation Agency. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is 

publishing the unclassified text of a 

section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. 

This is published to fulfill the 

requirements of section 155 of Public 

Law 104–164 dated 21 July 1996. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

J. Hurd, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 604–

6575. 

The following is a copy of a letter to 

the Speaker of the House of 

Representatives, Transmittal 06–64 with 

attached transmittal, policy justification, 

and Sensitivity of Technology. 

Dated: September 28, 2006. 

C.R. Choate, 

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison 

Officer, Department of Defense. 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–M 


mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with NOTICESEN05OC06.017</GPH> EN05OC06.018</GPH>
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 193 / Thursday, October 5, 2006 / Notices 58825 


mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with NOTICESEN05OC06.019</GPH>
58826 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 193 / Thursday, October 5, 2006 / Notices 


mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with NOTICESEN05OC06.020</GPH>
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 193 / Thursday, October 5, 2006 / Notices 58827 


mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with NOTICESEN05OC06.021</GPH> EN05OC06.022</GPH>
58828 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 193 / Thursday, October 5, 2006 / Notices 


mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with NOTICESEN05OC06.023</GPH>
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 193 / Thursday, October 5, 2006 / Notices 58829 

[FR Doc. 06–8506 Filed 10–4–06; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–C 


mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with NOTICESEN05OC06.024</GPH> EN05OC06.025</GPH>
#### § 1275.54 Appeal of restrictions.

The Nixon Presidential Library controls the Nixon Presidential historical materials. Upon petition of any researcher who claims in writing to the library director that the restriction of specified materials is inappropriate and should be removed, the archivists will submit the pertinent materials, or representative examples of them, to the library director. The library director reviews the restricted materials, and consults with interested Federal agencies as necessary. To the extent these consultations require the transfer of copies of materials to Federal officials outside NARA, the library director will comply with the requirements of § 1275.32. As necessary and practicable, the library director will also seek the views of any person whose rights or privileges might be adversely affected by a decision to open the materials. The library director prepares a final written decision as to the continued restriction of all or part of the pertinent materials. The library director's decision constitutes the final administrative determination. The library director will notify the petitioner and other interested people of the final administrative determination within 60 calendar days following receipt of such petition.
§ 697.24 Exempted waters for Maine State American lobster permits. A person or vessel holding a valid permit or license issued by the State of Maine that lawfully permits that person to engage in commercial fishing for American lobster may, with the approval of the State of Maine, engage in commercial fishing for American lobsters in the following areas designated as EEZ, if such fishing is conducted in such waters in accordance with all other applicable Federal and State regulations: ( a ) West of Monhegan Island in the Federal waters located north of the line from 43°42.17′ N lat., 69°34.27′ W long. to 43°42.25′ N lat., 69°19.30′ W long.
( b ) East of Monhegan Island in the federal waters located northwest of the line from 43°44′ N lat., 69°15.08′ W long. to 43°48.17′ N lat., 69°8.02′ W long.
( c ) South of Vinalhaven in the federal waters located west of the line from 43°52.61′ N lat., 68°40.00′ W long. to 43°58.12′ N lat., 68°32.95′ W long.
( d ) South of Boris Bubert Island in the federal waters located northwest of the line from 44°19.27′ N lat., 67°49.50′ W long. to 44°23.67′ N lat., 67°40.50′ W long.
[88 FR 67681, Oct. 2, 2023]
§ 1258.18 Where can I find NARA's current fees and information on how to order reproductions? ( a ) NARA's fee schedule, methods of payment, and ordering portal are located at *http://www.archives.gov .*
( b ) Fee schedules for reproductions made from the holdings of Presidential libraries may differ because of regional cost variations. Presidential library fee schedules are available at *http://www.archives.gov/presidential-libraries/ .* Some services may not be available at all NARA facilities.
( c ) In order to preserve certain records which are in poor physical condition, NARA may restrict customers to photographic or other kinds of duplication instead of electrostatic copies.
[76 FR 62632, Oct. 11, 2011, as amended at 78 FR 59825, Sept. 30, 2013]
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Katherine J. Harless, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Idearc Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,
and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) [Not Applicable]

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|      |  |               |  |  |  |                                      
|----- |  | ------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: |  | March 8, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ Katherine J. Harless             
|      |  |               |  |  |  | Katherine J. Harless                 
|      |  |               |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|      |  |               |  |  |  | (Principal Executive Officer)
§ 223.88 Bidding methods. ( a ) Competitive sales of National Forest timber shall be offered through either sealed or oral auction bidding. The method chosen for each sale will: ( 1 ) Insure open and fair competition,
( 2 ) Insure that the Federal Government receives not less than fair market value for the public resource,
( 3 ) Consider the economic stability of communities whose economies are dependent upon National Forest timber, and
( 4 ) Be consistent with the objectives of the National Forest Management Act of 1976, as amended, and other Federal Statutes.
( b ) As a prerequisite to participation in an oral auction, bidders shall submit a written sealed bid at least equal to the minimum acceptable bid prices specified in the prospectus. No price subsequently bid at oral auction shall be accepted if it is less than the written sealed bid.
( c ) The Chief, Forest Service, shall specify the use of sealed bids or a mix of bidding methods in areas where he has reasonable belief that collusive bidding may be occurring or where he determines that less than normal competitive bidding is occurring.
( d ) Sealed bids shall be used for sales within Federal Sustained Yield Units, except where the policy statement for the Unit restricts purchasers of timber within the Unit from buying National Forest timber outside the Unit and the Chief determines that oral bidding will protect individual communities within the Unit.
( e ) The Chief, Forest Service, may authorize departures from the requirements of paragraphs (c) and (d) of this section when he determines that departures are necessary to protect the public interest.
( f ) The Chief, Forest Service, may authorize the testing and evaluation of alternative bidding methods for National Forest timber.
[43 FR 21882, May 22, 1978. Redesignated at 49 FR 2761, Jan. 23, 1984. Further redesignated and amended at 50 FR 32696, Aug. 14, 1985]