alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Concert Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the Company) for the year ended
December 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Roger D. Tung, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |  |  |                                      
|--------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|Dated: March 31, 2014 |  |  |  | /s/ Roger D. Tung                    
|                      |  |  |  | Roger D. Tung                        
|                      |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Concert
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be retained by Concert Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# EUR-Lex - 12008M/PRO/25 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008M/PRO/25

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on European Union - PROTOCOLS - Protocol (No 25) on the exercise of shared competence **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0307 - 0307 *

PROTOCOL (No 25)

ON THE EXERCISE OF SHARED COMPETENCE

THE HIGH CONTRACTING PARTIES,

HAVE AGREED UPON the following provisions, which shall be annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union:

Sole Article

With reference to Article 2 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union on shared competence, when the Union has taken action in a certain area, the scope of this exercise of competence only covers those elements governed by the Union act in question and therefore does not cover the whole area.

--------------------------------------------------
§ 218.23 Proposed projects and activities not subject to legal notice and opportunity to comment. The legal notice and opportunity to comment procedures of this subpart do not apply to: ( a ) Any project or activity categorically excluded from documentation in an environmental assessment or environmental impact statement.
( b ) Proposed land management plans, plan revisions, and plan amendments that are subject to the objection process set out in 36 CFR part 219, subpart B;
( c ) Proposed plan amendments associated with a project or activity where the amendment applies not just to the particular project or activity but to all future projects and activities (see 36 CFR 219.59(b));
( d ) Proposed projects and activities not subject to the provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act and the implementing regulations at 40 CFR parts 1500 through 1508 and 36 CFR part 220;
( e ) Determinations by the responsible official, after consideration of new information or changed circumstances, that a correction, supplement, or revision of the EA or EIS is not required;
( f ) Rules promulgated in accordance with the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 551 *et seq.*) or policies and procedures issued in the Forest Service Manual and Handbooks (36 CFR part 216); and
( g ) Proposed hazardous fuel reduction projects authorized under the Healthy Forests Restoration Act.
[78 FR 18497, Mar. 27, 2013, as amended at 79 FR 44293, July 31, 2014]
# EUR-Lex - 12006E097 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12006E097

**Treaty establishing the European Community (consolidated version) - Part Three - Community policies - TITLE VI - Common rules on competition, taxation and approximation of laws - Chapter 3 - Approximation of laws - Article 97 **

*
Official Journal C 321 E , 29/12/2006 P. 0081 - 0081 Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0070 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0215 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0033 - Consolidated version (EEC Treaty - no official publication available) *

Article 97

1. Where there is a reason to fear that the adoption or amendment of a provision laid down by law, regulation or administrative action may cause distortion within the meaning of Article 96, a Member State desiring to proceed therewith shall consult the Commission. After consulting the Member States, the Commission shall recommend to the States concerned such measures as may be appropriate to avoid the distortion in question.

2. If a State desiring to introduce or amend its own provisions does not comply with the recommendation addressed to it by the Commission, other Member States shall not be required, pursuant to Article 96, to amend their own provisions in order to eliminate such distortion. If the Member State which has ignored the recommendation of the Commission causes distortion detrimental only to itself, the provisions of Article 96 shall not apply.

--------------------------------------------------
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 5452 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 5452

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 119 North Anderson Street in Elwood, Indiana, as the ``Officer Noah 
                Jacob Shahnavaz Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 9, 2024

 Mr. Young (for himself and Mr. Braun) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 119 North Anderson Street in Elwood, Indiana, as the ``Officer Noah 
                Jacob Shahnavaz Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. OFFICER NOAH JACOB SHAHNAVAZ POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 119 North Anderson Street in Elwood, Indiana, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Officer Noah Jacob Shahnavaz Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Officer 
Noah Jacob Shahnavaz Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)



In connection with the Annual Report of Wells
Real Estate Fund IV, L.P. (the Registrant) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Leo F. Wells, III, Chief
Executive Officer of the corporate general partner of one of the General Partners of the Registrant, and Douglas P. Williams, Chief Financial Officer of the corporate general partner of one of the General Partners of the Registrant, hereby certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that, to the best of our knowledge and belief:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                          
|--------------------------
|/s/    Leo F. Wells, III  
|Leo F. Wells, III         
|Chief Executive Officer   
|March 25, 2004            
|                          
|/s/    Douglas P. Williams
|Douglas P. Williams       
|Chief Financial Officer   
|March 25, 2004
§ 223.142 Causes for suspension. ( a ) The suspending official may suspend a purchaser suspected, upon adequate evidence, of the following: ( 1 ) Commission of: ( i ) Theft, forgery, bribery, embezzlement, falsification or destruction of records, making false statements, or receiving stolen property;
( ii ) Fraud, a criminal offense, or violation of Federal or State antitrust laws, any of which occurred in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain; or performing a public contract or subcontract; or
( iii ) Any other offense indicating a lack of business integrity or business honesty that seriously and directly affects the present responsibility of a purchase of Government timber.
( 2 ) Indictment for any of the causes listed in paragraph (a) of this section constitutes adequate evidence for suspension.
( 3 ) A purchaser's suspension from the purchaser of timber by another Federal agency which sells timber.
( b ) The suspending official may, upon adequate evidence, also suspend a purchaser for any other cause so serious or compelling that it affects the present responsibility or a purchaser of Government timber.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Pub. L. 94-409, that the Securities and Exchange Commission will hold the following meeting during the week of October 16, 2006: 

An Open Meeting will be held on Wednesday, October 18, 2006 at 10 a.m. in Room L-002, the Auditorium. 

The subject matter of the Open Meeting scheduled for Wednesday, October 18, 2006, will be: 

The Commission will consider whether to adopt amendments to the best-price rule for issuer and third-party tender offers under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The amendments would clarify that the best-price rule applies only with respect to the consideration offered and paid for securities tendered in a tender offer and should not apply to consideration offered and paid according to employment compensation, severance or other employee benefit arrangements entered into with security holders of the issuer or subject company. 

At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting items. 

For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, please contact: 

The Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400. 

Dated: October 11, 2006. 

Nancy M. Morris, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 06-8718 Filed 10-12-06; 10:55 am] 

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">The People of the State of New York, Respondent,<br><br>against<br><br>Giraldo Valle, Defendant-Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, Bronx County (Steven J. Hornstein, J.), rendered September 5, 2018, convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of speeding in violation of Vehicle and Traffic Law ยง 1180(a), and sentencing him conditional discharge and a $150 fine.</p><p>Per Curiam.</p><p>Judgment of conviction (Steven J. Hornstein, J.), rendered September 5, 2018, affirmed.</p><p>The sentence imposed upon defendant's plea of guilty to speeding in violation of Vehicle and Traffic Law [VTL] ยง 1180(a), specifically, both a $150 fine and conditional discharge, was not illegal. A defendant convicted of violating VTL ยง 1180 can "be punished by a fine of not less than forty-five nor more than one hundred fifty dollars, or by imprisonment for not more than fifteen days, or by both such fine and imprisonment" (VTL ยง 1180[h][2]). In lieu of imprisonment, a court may impose a conditional discharge upon a person convicted of any offense for which imprisonment is not a mandated sentence (<i>see</i> Penal Law ยง 65.05[1][a]), and whenever a court imposes a sentence of conditional discharge, it may also impose a fine (<i>see</i> Penal Law ยง 60.01[2][c]). Accordingly, the court legally sentenced defendant to both a fine and conditional discharge.</p><p>In any event, the only relief defendant requests is dismissal of the accusatory instrument, rather than a remand for resentencing, and he expressly requests that this Court affirm his conviction if it does not grant a dismissal. Since dismissal is not warranted, we affirm on this basis as well.</p><p>THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.</p><br>I concur I concur I concur<br>Decision Date: February 14, 2020<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_1_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22
- 0703 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. KEITH POPE,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**O RDER**  Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including September 25 , 2023 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 18 2023

08/18/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0703
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Chief Judge Moon, Judges Baker, Benton, Coleman, Willis, Elder, Bray, Fitzpatrick, Annunziata and Overton Argued at Richmond, Virginia

AARON AUGUSTIS WITTS

v. Record No. 0078-94-1 ORDER

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA

UPON A REHEARING EN BANC Thomas W. Carpenter (Overman, Cowardin & Martin, P.L.C., on brief), for appellant. Steven A. Witmer, Assistant Attorney General (James S. Gilmore, III, Attorney General, on brief), for appellee.

By memorandum opinion issued April 4, 1995, a panel of this Court affirmed the conviction of Aaron Augustis Witts (appellant) for use of profane, threatening, or indecent language over public airways, in violation of Code § 18.2-427. Witts v. Commonwealth , No. 0078-94-1, 1995 WL 143096 (Va. Ct. App. April 4, 1995) (Benton, J., dissenting). On appellant's motion, we stayed the mandate of that decision and granted rehearing en banc which was heard on October 5, 1995. For the reasons stated in the panel majority opinion, the stay of the mandate of the April 4, 1995 opinion is vacated, and we affirm the judgment of the trial court. Judges Benton, Coleman, Elder, and Fitzpatrick, for the reasons stated in Judge Benton's panel dissent, would reverse the

conviction.- 2 - This order shall be published and certified to the trial

court. Affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 31.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Sean McDonnell, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Ace Marketing &
Promotions, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer (if any) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.


DATE: November 3, 2005               /S/ SEAN MCDONNELL
                                    -------------------------
                                    SEAN MCDONNELL, CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
     FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FROM THE REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-K FOR THE QUARTER ENDED
     12/31/97.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER>                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                     U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                  JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                            1
<CASH>                                 5,417
<SECURITIES>                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                         10,990
<ALLOWANCES>                             265
<INVENTORY>                                0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      17,721
<PP&E>                                30,627
<DEPRECIATION>                        27,800
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        51,298
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 10,603
<BONDS>                                4,006
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                0
<COMMON>                                  45
<OTHER-SE>                            33,356
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          51,298
<SALES>                               35,035
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      35,035
<CGS>                                      0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         26,106
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                       6,218
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          57
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       227
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        2,484
<INCOME-TAX>                             946
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    1,538
<DISCONTINUED>                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                             (2,371)
<NET-INCOME>                            (833)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           (.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                           (.18)
        


</TABLE>
# EUR-Lex - 12002M041 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 12002M041

**Treaty on European Union (Nice consolidated version) - Title VI: Provisions on police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters - Article 41 **

*
Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0027 - 0027 Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0168 - Consolidated version *

Treaty on European Union (Nice consolidated version)

Title VI: Provisions on police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters

Article 41

Article 41

1. Articles 189, 190, 195, 196 to 199, 203, 204, 205(3), 206 to 209, 213 to 219, 255 and 290 of the Treaty establishing the European Community shall apply to the provisions relating to the areas referred to in this title.

2. Administrative expenditure which the provisions relating to the areas referred to in this title entail for the institutions shall be charged to the budget of the European Communities.

3. Operating expenditure to which the implementation of those provisions gives rise shall also be charged to the budget of the European Communities, except where the Council acting unanimously decides otherwise. In cases where expenditure is not charged to the budget of the European Communities, it shall be charged to the Member States in accordance with the gross national product scale, unless the Council acting unanimously decides otherwise.

4. The budgetary procedure laid down in the Treaty establishing the European Community shall apply to the expenditure charged to the budget of the European Communities.