alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended.  The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Special Emphasis Panel, Brain Injury Therapeutics Development.                    

*Date:*                         November 3, 2006.                    

*Time:*                         12 p.m. to 2 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Wyndham City Center Hotel, 1143 New Hampshire Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20037.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Richard D. Crosland, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural Research, NINDS/NIH/DHHS/Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Blvd., Suite 3208, MSC 9529,  Bethesda, MD 20892-9529, 301-594-0635,                         *rc218u@nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Programs Nos. 93.853, Clinical Research Related to Neurological Disorders; 93.854, Biological Basis Research in the Neurosciences, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

      ( print page 60743)    
Dated: October 5, 2006. 

Linda Payne, 

Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 06-8699  Filed 10-13-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### § 328.1 Purpose.

This regulation, in connection with the modification of the present prohibition of seaplane operations by the amendment to § 327.4 of title 36 of the Code of Federal Regulations, is designed to provide uniform policies and criteria for designating Corps projects, or portions thereof, at which seaplane operations are prohibited or restricted; and to continue to protect the integrity and all authorized uses of such projects and the safety of users of such projects. As used in this regulation, *projects* or *Corps projects* means water resources development projects administered by the Chief of Engineers.
# EUR-Lex - 12006E014 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12006E014

**Treaty establishing the European Community (consolidated version) - Part One - Principles - Article 14 **

*
Official Journal C 321 E , 29/12/2006 P. 0048 - 0049 Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0044 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0185 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0010 - Consolidated version *

Article 14

1. The Community shall adopt measures with the aim of progressively establishing the internal market over a period expiring on 31 December 1992, in accordance with the provisions of this Article and of Articles 15, 26, 47(2), 49, 80, 93 and 95 and without prejudice to the other provisions of this Treaty.

2. The internal market shall comprise an area without internal frontiers in which the free movement of goods, persons, services and capital is ensured in accordance with the provisions of this Treaty.

3. The Council, acting by a qualified majority on a proposal from the Commission, shall determine the guidelines and conditions necessary to ensure balanced progress in all the sectors concerned.

--------------------------------------------------
Date of 

report 

1967 

Apr. 18 

Date of report 

1987 

Apr. 14 

19 

~tuatr of tqr Juitrn ~tatr11 NINETIETH CONGRESS 

FIRST SESSION-Began January 10, 1967 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Pre pared under the direction of FRANCIS R. V ALEO, Secretary of the Senate 

By GERALD A. HACKETT, Executive Clerk 

Friday, April 21, 1967 

TREATY 

Calendar No Treaty No SubJeCt A.ctlon of committee 

15 Ex. D (90th Cong., Treaty on outer space-------------------- Reported favorably by 

1st sess.) Mr. Fulbright, from 

the Committee on 

Foreign Relations, 

with a printed report. 

(See Ex. Rept. No. 8, 

90th Cong., 1st sess.) 

NOMINATIONS 

Calendar Message I :-. ame of nommee Office Predecessor 

No No 

AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOP· 

MENT 

129 86 Rutherford M. Poats, of Deputy Administrator, 

Virginia. Agency for International 

Development. 

FARM CREDIT 

ADMINISTRATION 

141 140 Jonathan Davis, of A member of the Federal 

Massachusetts. Farm Credit Board, 

Farm Credit Administratwn, for a term 

expiring Mar. 31, 1973. 

65-022-67-No 36 

f S iiDYIRS.Eat PIIRTIII OffiCI: ltl:r
# Dziennik Urzędowy C 92A/27 k

| | ISSN 1725-5228 |
| --- | --- |
| Dziennik Urzędowy
  Unii Europejskiej | C 92A |
| | |
| Wydanie polskie | Informacje i zawiadomienia | Tom 5027 kwietnia 2007 |

ISSN 1725-5228

Dziennik Urzędowy

Unii Europejskiej

C 92A

Wydanie polskie

Informacje i zawiadomienia

Tom 5027 kwietnia 2007

---

| Powiadomienie nr | Spis treśći | Strona |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Ogłoszenia |
| | PROCEDURY ADMINISTRACYJNE |
| | Komisja |
| 2007/C 092A/01 | Ogłoszenie o naborze na stanowisko dyrektora Europejskiego Instytutu ds. Równości Kobiet i Mężczyzn – (grupa zaszeregowania AD 13) – COM/2007/10049 | 1 |

Powiadomienie nr

Spis treśći

Strona

V   Ogłoszenia

PROCEDURY ADMINISTRACYJNE

Komisja

2007/C 092A/01

Ogłoszenie o naborze na stanowisko dyrektora Europejskiego Instytutu ds. Równości Kobiet i Mężczyzn – (grupa zaszeregowania AD 13) – COM/2007/10049

1

| PL | |
| --- | --- |

PL

---

V Ogłoszenia

PROCEDURY ADMINISTRACYJNE

Komisja

| 27.4.2007 | PL | Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej | CA 92/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.4.2007

PL

Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej

CA 92/1

---

OGŁOSZENIE O NABORZE NA STANOWISKO DYREKTORA EUROPEJSKIEGO INSTYTUTU DS. RÓWNOŚCI KOBIET I MĘŻCZYZN

(grupa zaszeregowania AD 13)

COM/2007/10049

(2007/C 92  A/01)

Europejski Instytut ds. Równości Kobiet i Mężczyzn z siedzibą w Wilnie poszukuje osoby na stanowisko dyrektora.

Dyrektor zostanie mianowany przez zarząd Instytutu na podstawie listy kandydatów wyłonionych i zaproponowanych przez Komisję Europejską. Osoba zatrudniona na tym stanowisku będzie pełnić swoje obowiązki na podstawie umowy na czas określony jako pracownik w grupie zaszeregowania AD 13, zgodnie z art. 2a Warunków zatrudnienia innych pracowników Wspólnot Europejskich, przez okres pięciu lat z możliwością przedłużenia o kolejny okres nie dłuższy niż pięć lat. Instytut i Komisja stosują politykę równości szans.

Kandydaci muszą być obywatelami jednego z państw członkowskich Unii Europejskiej.

Opis stanowiska, formularz zgłoszeniowy i instrukcje dotyczące składania zgłoszeń można znaleźć na stronie:

http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/personnel_administration/working_senior_mgt_en.htm.

Termin nadsyłania zgłoszeń upływa w dniu 4 czerwca 2007 r.

---
§ 228.59 Negotiated or noncompetitive sales. ( a ) *Volume limitations.* When it is determined by the authorized officer to be in the public interest and when it is impracticable to obtain competition, mineral materials not exceeding 100,000 cubic yards in volume (or weight equivalent) may be sold in any one sale at not less than the appraised value, without advertising or calling for bids, except as provided in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section. The authorized officer may not approve noncompetitive sales that exceed the total of 200,000 cubic yards (or weight equivalent) made in any one State for the benefit of any applicant in any period of 12 consecutive months.
( b ) *Government programs.* In connection with a public works improvement project on behalf of a Federal, State, or local governmental agency, the authorized officer may sell to an applicant, at not less than the appraised value, without advertising or calling for bids, a volume of mineral materials not to exceed 200,000 cubic yards (or weight equivalent) when the public exigency will not permit delays incident to advertising (30 U.S.C. 602).
( c ) *Appropriation for highway purposes.* For interstate and/or Federal aid highways, the Secretary of Transportation may appropriate any volume in accordance with 23 U.S.C. 107 and 317.
( d ) *Use in development of Federal mineral leases.* When it is determined to be impracticable to obtain competition and the mineral materials are to be used in connection with the development of mineral leases issued by the United States (§ 228.44), the authorized officer may sell to a leaseholder a volume of mineral material not to exceed 200,000 cubic yards (or weight equivalent) in one State in any period of 12 consecutive months. No charge will be made for materials which must be moved in the process of extracting the mineral under lease, as long as the materials remain stockpiled within the boundaries of the leased area.
( e ) *Exceptions.* ( 1 ) The Chief of the Forest Service may authorize the noncompetitive sale of mineral materials in excess of the volume limitations in paragraphs (a), (b), and (d) of this section when necessary to: ( i ) Respond to an emergency affecting public health, safety or property;
( ii ) Prevent the curtailment of operations conducted under the United States mining laws of May 10, 1872, as amended (30 U.S.C. 22 *et seq.*) which generate large volumes of mineral materials as a by-product; or
( iii ) Respond to a critical public need for the prompt development of a mineral lease issued by the United States or a mining claim located under the United States mining laws of May 10, 1872, as amended (30 U.S.C. 22 *et seq.*).
( 2 ) Any noncompetitive sale of mineral materials in excess of the volume limitations in paragraphs (a), (b), and (d) shall be subject to such restrictions as the Chief of the Forest Service determines to be in the public interest.
( 3 ) Nothing in this paragraph shall otherwise alter the requirements of paragraphs (a) through (d) of this section.
[49 FR 29784, July 24, 1984, as amended at 52 FR 10565, Apr. 2, 1987; 53 FR 43691, Oct. 28, 1988]
EXHIBIT 32.1
                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO\
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the quarterly report of Cactus New Media I, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, RS Schmitt, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



Date: November 11, 2003

/s/RS Schmitt
-------------
RS Schmitt
Chief Executive Officer
### Tribal NSR Meeting
Tuesday, May 24 , 2011

Meeting Note to the Docket

Discussion Topics

On May 24 , 2011 , representatives from the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (Laura McKelvey, Jessica Montanez, Angel McCormack, Toni Colon) participated in a

o utreach conference call to answer questions from the Forest County Potawatomi Community on the rule titled: “Review of New Sources and Modifications in Indian Country, ” commonly known as the “Tribal NSR Rule.” During this meeting the tribal representative s
, John Clancy, Natalene Cummings, and Dunkin Moss, commented or asked various questions related to this action including:

• Minor NSR Thresholds. Tribal representatives expressed concern s about the proposed minor NSR t hresholds. They believe these thresholds are very stringent.

• General Permits

. Tribal representatives would like general permits to be readily available at the time the rule is finalized. They would also prefer these permits if the EPA regions are allowed to create region spec ific or tribal specific general permits.

• TIP Approval Timeframe

. Tribal representatives inquired about the timeframe it might take to get TIP approval under this rule.

• Differences between Our Rule and the State of Wisconsin Rules

. Tribal representativ es expressed concerns about the differences between this rule and the

rules that apply in the state where their Tribal lands are located, Wisconsin. These representatives believe that we would not be able to level the playing field

with this state since o ur rule is more stringent than the rule s that apply in

Wisconsin.

• Exempted Units List

. Tribal representatives believe that e mergency generators should be exempted from t he rule’s requirements.

• Offset Sources in Nonattainment Areas

. Tribal representati ves expressed concerns about the current unavailability of offsets in Indian country.
#### § 262.13 Removal of obstructions.

A Forest Officer may remove or have removed a vehicle or other object on National Forest System lands that is abandoned or vandalized or that poses an impediment or hazard to the safety, convenience, or comfort of National Forest System visitors.

[79 FR 44296, July 31, 2014]
## In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07 - 15 - 00221 - CV SAAHIR JEHAAD ABDALL AH, APPELLANT V. JIM HOLMES, ET AL., APPELLEE On Appeal from the 237th District Court Lubbock County, Texas Trial Court No. 2014 - 511,655, Honorable Leslie Hatch, Presiding



### July 14, 2015 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ. Appellant Saahir Jehaad Abdahllah attempts to appeal a court order striking his petition and dismissing the lawsuit he filed against appellees. The order was signed on April 21, 2015. Appellant’s notice of appeal was filed with the district clerk on June 5, 2015. We dismiss this appeal because of appellant’s failure to comply with the Court’s order requiring a written explanation for his late notice of appeal. T EX . R. A PP . P . 42.3(c). Appellant’s notice of appeal was due on May 21, 2015. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 26.1. Appellant filed a no tice of appeal on June 5, 2015, but did not file a motion requesting2

an extension of time to file the notice of appeal. Under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.3, the Court may extend the time to file a notice of appeal if, within 15 days after the dea dline expires, the appellant files the notice of appeal along with a motion requesting an extension that reasonably explains the need for an extension. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 26.3 & 10.5(b). Although a motion for extension is implied when the appellant tende rs a notice of appeal within 15 days after the notice deadline, it is still necessary for the appellant to reasonably explain the need for an extension. See Verburgt v. Dorner

, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997); Jones v. City of Houston , 976 S.W.2d 676, 677 (Tex. 1998). Because appellant filed a notice of appeal within 15 days after the deadline, a motion for extension was implied. However, the Court ordered appellant to file a written response by June 26, 2015 explaining why the notice of appeal was filed late. The Court also informed appellant that the failure to comply with the Court’s directive would result in dismissal of the appeal. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 42.3. Although appellant has filed various motions, appellant did not respond to the Court’s directive for an explanation. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.3(c) because appellant failed to comply with a cour t order requiring a response within a specified time. Of course, appellant has 15 days to file a motion for rehearing wherein he may comply with the Court’s previous directive for an explanation. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 49.1. Per Curiam
Exhibit
31.1





MIT
Holding, Inc.


Certification
Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)


Section
302 Certification





I,
William C. Parker, the Chief Executive Officer of MIT Holding, Inc., certify
that:





1.    I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of MIT Holding, Inc.;





2.    Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.    Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, the results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4.    The
issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) for the


for the
issuer and have:





(a)   designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period
in which this report is being prepared;





(b)  evaluated
the effectiveness of the issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and





(c)  disclosed
in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the issuer's most recent fiscal quarter
(the issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer's
internal control over financial reporting; and





5.    The
issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small
business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business
issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):





(a)   all
significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the issuer's
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and





(b)   any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the issuer's internal control over financial
reporting.





Date:   April
15, 2010





/s/
      William C. ParkerWilliam
      C. ParkerChief
      Executive Officer
§ 251.9 Management of Municipal Watersheds. ( a ) The Forest Service shall manage National Forest watersheds that supply municipal water under multiple use prescriptions in forest plans (36 CFR part 219). When a municipality desires protective actions or restrictions of use not specified in the forest plan, within agreements, and/or special use authorizations, the municipality must apply to the Forest Service for consideration of these needs.
( b ) When deemed appropriate by the Regional Forester, requested restrictions and/or requirements shall be incorporated in the forest plan without written agreements. Written agreements with municipalities to assure protection of water supplies are appropriate when requested by the municipality and deemed necessary by the Regional Forester. A special use authorization may be needed to effect these agreements.
( c ) In preparing any municipal watershed agreement for approval by the Regional Forester or issuing special use authorization to protect municipal water supplies, the authorized forest officer shall specify the types of uses, if any, to be restricted; the nature and extent of any restrictions; any special land management protective measures and/or any necessary standards and guidelines needed to protect water quality or quantity; and any resources that are to be provided by the municipality.
( d ) A special use authorization (36 CFR 251.54) is required if the municipality is to use the subject lands, restrict public access, or control resource uses within the watershed. Special use authorizations issued pursuant to this section are subject to the same fee waivers, conditions, and procedures applicable to all other special uses as set forth in subpart B of this part.
( e ) Any municipal watershed management agreements, special use authorizations, requirements, and/or restrictions shall be consistent with forest plans, or amendments and revisions thereto.
[53 FR 27685, July 22, 1988]