alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the
incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements:



| | 1. | Registration Statement (Form S-8) 333-127435 pertaining to the Entorian Technologies Inc. (formerly, Staktek Holdings, Inc.) 2003 Stock Option Plan and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Registration Statement (Form S-8) 333-133494 pertaining to the Entorian Technologies Inc. 2003 Stock Option Plan;
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

of our report dated March 13, 2008, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Entorian Technologies Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
of Entorian Technologies Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2007.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Austin, TX

March 13, 2008
§ 13.934 How will the superintendent manage the permit program? ( a ) The superintendent will apportion motor vehicle permits among authorized users following the procedures in § 13.55. Authorized users are individuals, groups and governmental entities who are allowed by law or policy to use the restricted section of the road.
( b ) The superintendent will establish an annual date to evaluate permit requests and publish that date, along with the results of the annual apportionment, in the superintendent's compendium of rules and orders. The superintendent's compendium is available to the public upon request.
( c ) The superintendent will reevaluate the access requirements of any business that is sold, ceases to operate or that significantly changes the services currently offered to the public.
# EUR-Lex - 12008E181 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008E181

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - PART THREE: UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS - TITLE XIX: RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT AND SPACE - Article 181 (ex Article 165 TEC) **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0129 - 0129 *

Article 181

(ex Article 165 TEC)

1. The Union and the Member States shall coordinate their research and technological development activities so as to ensure that national policies and Union policy are mutually consistent.

2. In close cooperation with the Member State, the Commission may take any useful initiative to promote the coordination referred to in paragraph 1, in particular initiatives aiming at the establishment of guidelines and indicators, the organisation of exchange of best practice, and the preparation of the necessary elements for periodic monitoring and evaluation. The European Parliament shall be kept fully informed.

--------------------------------------------------
# EUR-Lex - 12006M/PRO/07 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12006M/PRO/07

**Treaty on European Union (consolidated version) - C. Protocols annexed to the Treaty on European Union, to the Treaty establishing the European Community and to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community - Protocol (No 7) annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaties establishing the European Communities (1992) **

*
Official Journal C 321 E , 29/12/2006 P. 0225 - 0225 *

Protocol (No 7)

annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaties establishing the European Communities (1992)

THE HIGH CONTRACTING PARTIES

HAVE AGREED upon the following provision, which shall be annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaties establishing the European Communities:

Nothing in the Treaty on European Union, or in the Treaties establishing the European Communities, or in the Treaties or Acts modifying or supplementing those Treaties, shall affect the application in Ireland of Article 40.3.3 of the Constitution of Ireland.

--------------------------------------------------
# EUR-Lex - 12006E168 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12006E168

**Treaty establishing the European Community (consolidated version) - Part Three - Community policies - TITLE XVIII - Research and technological development - Article 168 **

*
Official Journal C 321 E , 29/12/2006 P. 0122 - 0122 Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0106 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0253 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0051 - Consolidated version *

Article 168

In implementing the multiannual framework programme, supplementary programmes may be decided on involving the participation of certain Member States only, which shall finance them subject to possible Community participation.

The Council shall adopt the rules applicable to supplementary programmes, particularly as regards the dissemination of knowledge and access by other Member States.

--------------------------------------------------
# EUR-Lex - 12006E284 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12006E284

**Treaty establishing the European Community (consolidated version) - Part Six - General and final provisions - Article 284 **

*
Official Journal C 321 E , 29/12/2006 P. 0171 - 0171 Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0146 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0294 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0075 - Consolidated version (EEC Treaty - no official publication available) *

Article 284

The Commission may, within the limits and under conditions laid down by the Council in accordance with the provisions of this Treaty, collect any information and carry out any checks required for the performance of the tasks entrusted to it.

--------------------------------------------------
#### § 228.6 Availability of information to the public.

Except as provided herein, all information and data submitted by an operator pursuant to the regulations in this part shall be available for examination by the public at the Office of the District Ranger in accordance with the provisions of 7 CFR 1.1-1.6 and 36 CFR 200.5-200.10. Specifically identified information and data submitted by the operator as confidential concerning trade secrets or privileged commercial or financial information will not be available for public examination. Information and data to be withheld from public examination may include, but is not limited to, known or estimated outline of the mineral deposits and their location, attitude, extent, outcrops, and content, and the known or planned location of exploration pits, drill holes, excavations pertaining to location and entry pursuant to the United States mining laws, and other commercial information which relates to competitive rights of the operator.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsTransonic wind tunnel test of a 14 percent thick oblique wingAn experimental investigation was conducted at the ARC 11- by 11-Foot Transonic Wind Tunnel as part of the Oblique Wing Research Aircraft Program to study the aerodynamic performance and stability characteristics of a 0.087-scale model of an F-8 airplane fitted with an oblique wing designed by Rockwell International. The 10.3 aspect ratio, straight-tapered wing of 0.14 thickness/chord ratio was tested at two different mounting heights above the fuselage. Additional tests were conducted to assess low-speed behavior with and without flaps, aileron effectiveness at representative flight conditions, and transonic drag divergence with 0 degree wing sweep. Longitudinal stability data were obtained at sweep angles of 0, 30, 45, 60, and 65 degrees, at Mach numbers ranging from 0.25 to 1.40. Test Reynolds numbers varied from 3.2 to 6.6 x 10 exp 6/ft. and angle of attack ranged from -5 to +18 degrees. Most data were taken at zero sideslip, but a few runs were at sideslip angles of +/- 5 degrees. The raised wing position proved detrimental overall, although side force and yawing moment were reduced at some conditions. Maximum lift coefficient with the flaps deflected was found to fall short of the value predicted in the preliminary design document. The performance and trim characteristics of the present wing are generally inferior to those obtained for a previously tested wing designed at ARC.Document ID19920022969Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsKennelly, Robert A., Jr.*(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA, United States)*Kroo, Ilan M.*(Stanford Univ. CA., United States)*Strong, James M.*(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA, United States)*Carmichael, Ralph L.*(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateAugust 1, 1990Subject CategoryAerodynamicsReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-102230NAS 1.15:102230A-89236Accession Number92N32213Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 533-06-01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19920022969.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
fusb-ex101_73.htm



 

Exhibit 10.1

 

 

FIRST US BANCSHARES, INC. NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR FEE SCHEDULE

(Effective 7/1/2020)

 

 

RETAINER SCHEDULE

 

 


	
DIRECTOR:
	
$24,000 annually

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
NON-EXECUTIVE BOARD CHAIR:
	
+ $10,000 annually

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
COMMITTEE CHAIR: 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
Audit
	
+ $7,500 annually

	
 
	
Compensation
	
+ $5,000 annually

	
 
	
Executive, Nominating & Corporate Governance
	
+ $5,000 annually

	
 
	
Other (ALCO, DLC, ROTC, ALC Board)
	
+ $3,000 annually




 

 

Annual Equity Awards 

Non-employee directors will be eligible for annual equity awards under the First US Bancshares, Inc. 2013 Incentive Plan, as amended, in such form and amount as determined by the Compensation Committee.

 

Mileage

Any non-employee director attending a board, committee or special meeting outside the county in which the director resides will be paid mileage at the Company’s mileage reimbursement rate. Any officer or employee attending such meeting will be paid mileage at the same rate if a Company vehicle is not assigned to the officer or employee.

 

Other Expenses

Any non-employee director that may incur expenses for travel, training, customer entertainment or other such Company-related item shall complete the Company’s standard reimbursement claim form and submit it to the CEO.  If approved by the CEO, the non-employee director will be reimbursed for such Company-related expense according to existing Company Policy.

 

Meetings may be attended in person or via conference call.
EXHBIT  32.2
------------

CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT  TO
18  U.S.C.  SECTION  1350,
AS  ADOPTED  PURSUANT  TO
SECTION  906  OF  THE  SARBANES-OXLEY  ACT  OF  2002

In  connection  with  the  Quarterly Report of Bluetorch Inc. (the "Company") on
Form  10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission  on  the  date  hereof  (the "Report"), Bernard Gurr, Chief
Financial  Officer  of  the  Company,  certifies  to  the best of his knowledge,
pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  ss.  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

(2)  The  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  result  of operations of the Company.



/s/  Bernard  Gurr
-----------------------------
Bernard  Gurr
Chief  Financial  Officer





August  19,  2004
Case 16-28740 Doc 7 Filed 09/08/16 Entered 09/08/16 13:14:11 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2
Case 16-28740 Doc 7 Filed 09/08/16 Entered 09/08/16 13:14:11 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2
118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 5639 

AN ACT 

To extend the authority for the protection of certain facilities 

and assets from unmanned aircraft. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 5639 ES

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Counter-UAS Author3 ity Extension Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF COUNTER-UAS AUTHORITIES OF 

5 THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY 

6 AND THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE. 

7 Section 210G(i) of the Homeland Security Act of 

8 2002 (6 U.S.C. 124n(i)) is amended by striking ‘‘Decem9 ber 20, 2024’’ and inserting ‘‘September 30, 2025’’. 

Passed the Senate December 20 (legislative day, December 16), 2024. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 5639 

AN ACT 

To extend the authority for the protection of certain facilities and assets from unmanned aircraft.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 552 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 552

  To extend duty-free treatment provided with respect to imports from 
         Haiti under the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 28, 2023

   Mr. Rubio (for himself, Mr. Warnock, Mr. Cassidy, and Mr. Durbin) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                          Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To extend duty-free treatment provided with respect to imports from 
         Haiti under the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Haiti Economic Lift Program 
Extension Act of 2023''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF SPECIAL RULES FOR HAITI UNDER CARIBBEAN BASIN 
              ECONOMIC RECOVERY ACT.

    Section 213A of the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery Act (19 
U.S.C. 2703a) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (b)--
                    (A) in paragraph (1)--
                            (i) by amending subparagraph (B)(v)(I) to 
                        read as follows:
                                    ``(I) Applicable percentage.--The 
                                term `applicable percentage' means 60 
                                percent or more during the period 
                                beginning on December 20, 2017, and 
                                ending on September 30, 2035.''; and
                            (ii) by amending subparagraph (C) to read 
                        as follows:
                    ``(C) Quantitative limitations.--The preferential 
                treatment described in subparagraph (A) shall be 
                extended, during each period after the initial 
                applicable 1-year period, to not more than 1.25 percent 
                of the aggregate square meter equivalents of all 
                apparel articles imported into the United States in the 
                most recent 12-month period for which data are 
                available.''; and
                    (B) in paragraph (2), by striking ``in each of the 
                16 succeeding 1-year periods'' each place it appears 
                and inserting ``in any of the succeeding 1-year 
                periods''; and
            (2) by amending subsection (h) to read as follows:
    ``(h) Termination.--The duty-free treatment provided under this 
section shall remain in effect until September 30, 2035.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 64.12 Standards for grantee financial management systems.

The grantees' Financial Management Systems shall meet the minimum standards set forth in OMB Circular A-102, Attachment G.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   Exhibit 10.19

MEMO TO:  Charles H. Mayer
SUBJECT:  New Terms for Employment
DATE:     January 1, 2001

Charlie,

Per our recent discussions, we have mutually agreed to alter several key points
of the existing employment contract between you and Tejas Securities Group, Inc.
Following is a summary of the key terms of the revised agreement:

     o Your salary for the year 2001 will be $225,000 annually. This will be
       paid pro rata monthly on the first day of each month. The salary that you
       forfeited in the year 2000 as a part of corporate reductions will not be
       recouped.

     o You have agreed to forfeit the guaranteed bonuses of $200,000 for each of
       the years 2000 and 2001. In lieu of this forfeiture, Tejas will pay you a
       bonus for 2001 equal to 10% of the pretax income of Tejas for the year
       ending December 31, 2001. For subsequent years that you are employed for
       the full calendar year, your annual bonus will continue to be 10% of the
       pretax income for the entire calendar year. Should you terminate
       employment at some time not at the end of the fiscal year, your
       subsequent bonus will be prorated based upon the number of months worked
       as an employee. No bonus will be paid for the year 2000.

     o For three years following your last day of full time employment with
       Tejas you will be retained as a consultant for Tejas. Your fee will be
       $1,200 per day for each day of service and you will be entitled to an
       annual bonus of 1% of the pretax income of Tejas.

     o Tejas will pay for one round trip airfare for you each month to Newark.
       This will continue as long as you are a full time employee at Tejas.

     o In each of the years 2001, 2002, 2003 and 2004, you will be forgiven
       $50,000 of the note payable that your currently have with Westech Capital
       Corp. This will fully retire your outstanding $200,000 note payable by
       the end of 2004.

Please let me know if the stated terms are what we agreed upon during our
discussions. If so, please sign this memo and return to Kurt Rechner for
inclusion as an addendum to your employment agreement.

Charlie, thanks for your input into this process and please contact me if you
have any questions.

/s/ JOHN J. GORMAN                              /s/ CHARLES H. MAYER
--------------------------------                --------------------------------
John J. Gorman                                  Charles H. Mayer
Chief Executive Officer                         Chief Operating Officer
Exhibit 10.10




SUMMARY OF COMPENSATION FOR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AS OF MARCH 8, 2011




As of March 8, 2011, the Board of Directors established annual base salary for our named executive officers as follows:




Name and Title
CompensationThomas R. Johnson, President and Chief Executive Officer, Call Now, Inc.
$
200,000Christopher J. Hall, Chairman, Call Now, Inc.
$
200,000Bryan P. Brown, Chief Executive Officer, Retama Entertainment Group, Inc.
$
200,000


Following the end of each fiscal year the Board may pay a bonus to our named executive officers. Such Bonus is paid in the event the Board deems it appropriate and the employee is not promised such bonus in advance and it is not payable for achievement of any established goals or targets.




31




---
#### § 51.44 How will the Director determine if a concessioner was satisfactory for purposes of a right of preference?

To be a satisfactory concessioner for the purposes of a right of preference, the Director must determine that the concessioner operated satisfactorily on an overall basis during the term of its applicable concession contract, including extensions of the contract. The Director will base this determination in consideration of annual evaluations made by the Director of the concessioner's performance under the terms of the applicable concession contract and other relevant facts and circumstances. The Director must determine that a concessioner did not operate satisfactorily on an overall basis during the term of a concession contract if the annual evaluations of the concessioner made subsequent to May 17, 2000 are less than satisfactory for any two or more years of operation under the concession contract.
EXE·CUTIVE CALENDAR 

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF EMERY L. FRAZIER, SECRETARY OF THE SENATE 

BY LARRY M. WHEELER, ExEcUTIVE CLEa:s: 

Monday, August 22, 1966 

TREATIES 

' 

Date of Calendar Treaty No. Subject Action of Committee report No. 

1965 

June 29 2 Ex. H (86th Cong., Hague Protocol to Warsaw Convention ____ Reported favombiy by 

1st sess.). Mr. Fulbright from 

the Committee on 

Foreign Relations, 

with a printed report. 

(See Ex. Rept. No.3, 

89th Cong., J.st sees.) 

Aug. 3 3 Ex. D (88th Cong., Consular Convention With the Soviet Reported favorably by 

2d sess.). Union. Mr. Fulbright from 

the Committee on 

Foreign Relations, 

with a printed reporL. 

(See Ex. Rept. No.4, 

89th Cong., 1st sees.) 

Minority views filed 

Aug. 5, 1965. (See 

Ex. Rept. No. 4, p. 2, 

89th Cong., let sese.) 

U,S, GOVERNMENt' PRINTING .OFFICE :I986
[ J
- 86
- 2018 ] [MO: Wecht, J. ] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Appellee

v.

MICHAEL J. HICKS,

Appellant : : : : : : : : : : : No. 56 MAP 2017 Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court dated March 29, 2017 at No. 510 EDA 2016 Affirming Judgment of Sentence from the Lehigh County Court of Common Pleas, Criminal Division, dated January 11, 2016 at No. CP

- 39

- CR

- 0005692

- 2014. ARGUED: December 4, 2018

CONCURRING O PINION

JUSTICE BAER DECIDED: May 31, 2019 This Court granted allowance of appeal in this matter to address the narrow question of “ [w]hether the Superior Court’ s bright line rule holding that possession of a concealed firearm in public is sufficient to create reasonable suspicion [.]” Commonwealth
v. Hicks , 172 A.3d 583 ( Pa. 2017) . I agree with the Majority that this bright line rule cannot withstand constitutional scrutiny; accordingly, I join Parts I., II.A. , B., and C.(i.

- v.) of the Majority Opinion. Most importantly, I join the Majority’s ultimate conclusion that “the Superior Court patently has erred in concluding that the possession of a concealed firearm by an individual in public is sufficient to create a reasonable suspicion that the individual may be dangerous, such that an officer can approach the individual and briefly detain him in order to investigate whether the person is properly licensed .” Majority Opinion at 45 (internal quotation marks omitted).[ J

- 86

- 2018 ] [MO: Wecht, J. ]

- 2

Having answered the sole question presented in this matter , unlike the Majority, I would not examine whether the trial court erred by denying Appellant’s motion to
supp ress. Majority Opinion at 45 (“Notwithstanding the lower courts’ application of an erroneous conclusion of law, there remains a question of whether [Appellant’s] seizure nonetheless was supported by reasonable, articulable suspicion of criminal activity, such as would render the investigative detention lawful

. ”). Rather, I would vacate the judgment of the Superior Court and remand the matter to that court with the instruction to reconsider the merits of Appellant’s direct appeal in light of this Court’s decision.
#### § 504.3 Preservation of property.

It is unlawful willfully to destroy, damage, or remove property or any part thereof. Any parcels, portfolios, bags, or containers of any kind may be required to be opened and the contents identified prior to removal from the premises. In order to remove any property from the premises, a properly completed property pass signed by an authorized official of the Smithsonian Institution may be required prior to removal.