alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

In re: 

MARCHELLE MARIE PAGE

Debtor(s)

Case No. 16-28525

CHAPTER 13 STANDING TRUSTEE’S FINAL REPORT AND ACCOUNT

Tom Vaughn, chapter 13 trustee, submits the following Final Report and Account of the 

administration of the estate pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1302(b)(1). The trustee declares as follows:

1) The case was filed on 09/06/2016.

2) The plan was confirmed on NA .

3) The plan was modified by order after confirmation pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1329 on

NA .

4) The trustee filed action to remedy default by the debtor in performance under the plan 

on NA .

5) The case was dismissed on 09/29/2016.

6) Number of months from filing to last payment: 0.

7) Number of months case was pending: 2.

8) Total value of assets abandoned by court order: NA .

9) Total value of assets exempted: NA .

10) Amount of unsecured claims discharged without payment: $0.00.

11) All checks distributed by the trustee relating to this case have cleared the bank.

UST Form 101-13-FR-S (09/01/2009)

Case 16-28525 Doc 21 Filed 11/14/16 Entered 11/14/16 11:28:23 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 3
Receipts:

Total paid by or on behalf of the debtor $0.00

Less amount refunded to debtor $0.00

NET RECEIPTS: $0.00

Expenses of Administration:

Attorney’s Fees Paid Through the Plan $0.00

Court Costs $0.00

Trustee Expenses & Compensation $0.00

Other $0.00

TOTAL EXPENSES OF ADMINISTRATION: $0.00

Attorney fees paid and disclosed by debtor: $0.00

Scheduled Creditors:

Creditor

Name Class

Claim

Scheduled

Claim

Asserted

Claim

Allowed

Int.

Paid

Principal

Paid

Summary of Disbursements to Creditors:

Secured Payments:

Mortgage Ongoing

Mortgage Arrearage

Debt Secured by Vehicle

All Other Secured

TOTAL SECURED:

Priority Unsecured Payments:

Domestic Support Arrearage

Domestic Support Ongoing

All Other Priority

TOTAL PRIORITY:

GENERAL UNSECURED PAYMENTS:

Claim

Allowed

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

Principal

Paid

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

Interest

Paid

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

UST Form 101-13-FR-S (09/01/2009)

Case 16-28525 Doc 21 Filed 11/14/16 Entered 11/14/16 11:28:23 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 3
Disbursements:

Expenses of Administration $0.00

Disbursements to Creditors $0.00

TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS : $0.00

12) The trustee certifies that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 5009, 

the estate has been fully administered, the foregoing summary is true and complete, and all 

administrative matters for which the trustee is responsible have been completed. The trustee 

requests a final decree be entered that discharges the trustee and grants such other relief as may 

be just and proper.

Dated: 11/14/2016

STATEMENT: This Unified Form is associated with an open bankruptcy case, therefore, Paperwork Reduction 

Act exemption 5 C.F.R. § 1320.4(a)(2) applies.

By:/s/ Tom Vaughn

Trustee

UST Form 101-13-FR-S (09/01/2009)

Case 16-28525 Doc 21 Filed 11/14/16 Entered 11/14/16 11:28:23 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 3
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 196 (Wednesday, October 11, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 59839]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-8644]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD


Sunshine Act Meeting

Agenda

Time and Date: 9:30 a.m., Tuesday, October 17, 2006.

Place: NTSB Conference Center, 429 L'Enfant Plaza, SW., Washington, DC 
20594.

Status: The two items are open to the public.

Matters to be Considered: 7835--Railroad Accident Brief and Safety 
Recommendation Letters--Collision of Two Union Pacific Railroad Freight 
Trains, Texarkana, Arkansas, October 15, 2005.
    7836--Railroad Accident Brief and Safety Recommendation Letters--
Derailment of Amtrak Passenger Train No. 27, Home Valley, Washington, 
April 3, 2005.

News Media Contact: The Office of Public Affairs, Telephone: (202) 314-
6100.
    Individuals requesting specific accommodations should contact Chris 
Bisett at (202) 314-6305 by Friday, October 13, 2006.
    The public may view the meeting via a live or archived webcast by 
accessing a link under ``News & Events'' on the NTSB home page at 
www.ntsb.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vicky D'Onofrio, (202) 314-6410.

    Dated: October 6, 2006.
Vicky D'Onofrio,
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 06-8644 Filed 10-6-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7533-01-M
Exhibit 10.13

                               INDEMNITY AGREEMENT


FOR GOOD AND VALUABLE CONSIDERATION,  including but not limited to the agreement
of Ethan  Willis and Randy Garn  ("indemnities")  to  provide  his/her  personal
guarantee to assist in financing for the undersigned  company,  the undersigned,
Innovative Software Technologies, Inc. ("Company" or "Indemnitor"), by and under
the  authority  of its  Board of  Directors,  hereby  covenants  and  agrees  to
indemnify  and hold  Indemnitee  harmless  from and  against  any and all claim,
demand,  loss,  cost,  action or liability,  including  attorneys fees and costs
incurred in defending  against any such claim,  demand or action,  arising from,
relating to or in any way resulting from obligations undertaken by Indemnitee as
personal guarantor for indemnitor.

In addition the company will place  1,500,000  shares of its common stock in the
escrow  account of Attorney  Keith Collins to further  indemnify the  guarantor.
This  stock  will be fully  issued  and  outstanding  in the hands of the escrow
agent.  Upon failure of the company to satisfy its obligation this stock will be
sod to cover the obligations, which were guaranteed.

By signing below, the undersigned,  as an officer of Indemnitor,  represents and
warrants that this Indemnity  Agreement has been  authorized and approved by the
Board of Directors of Indemnitor,  by resolution duly and properly adopted,  and
that the  undersigned  has authority to execute this instrument on behalf of the
Company.

DATED this 9th day of January, 2002.



                                    /s/ D. Shane Hackett
                                    By Douglas Shane Hackett
                                    Innovative Software Technologies, Inc.
                                    It's President

Attest: /s/ Shawn Thomas
        Secretary - Shawn Thomas
§ 1150.14 Appearance. ( a ) A party may appear in person or by counsel or other representative and participate fully in any proceedings. An agency, state or local body, corporation or other association, may appear by any of its officers or by any employee it authorizes to appear on its behalf.
( b ) A representative of a party or participant shall be deemed to control all matters respecting the interest of such party or participant in the proceedings.
( c ) This section shall not be construed to require any representative to be an attorney-at-law.
( d ) Withdrawal of appearance of any representative is effective when a written notice of withdrawal is filed and served on all parties and participants.
#### Embree *et al., Appellants,*v. Patrick.

Petition, when Demurrable: statute op limitations : tenancy by courtesy. If it is impossible to determine from the allegations of the petition whether or not the plaintiff has a cause of action, a demurrer will lie.

Hence, where an action was brought to set aside a deed executed twenty-six years before, and the petition showed that plaintiff’s mother, through whom she claimed title, was a minor at the date of execution of the deed, and married and died a minor, leaving plaintiff her only heir, but failed to show whether plaintiff’s father survived her mother or not; *Held,*that if the father was still living he was tenant by courtesy, and plaintiff could not maintain her action. If he died before the mother, the action was barred by limitation. If he survived her, but was dead when the action was brought, it was not necessarily barred. For want of a proper allegation as to survivorship, therefore, the petition was demurrable.

*Appeal from Randolph Circuit Court.*— Hon. G-. H. Burok-HARTT, Judge.

Aeeirmed.

*T. B. Kimbrough*for appellants.

*Martin & Priest*for respondents.

Napton, J.

This suit was brought in 1877. Its object was to have a deed declared void, as a cloud upon plaintiff's’ title, made in 1851, twenty-six years before the commencement of the action. A demurrer was filed by defendants and sustained by the court. The plaintiff1 is a grand-child of one Kirkpatrick, who died in 1847, and whose administrator made the deed in question to his widow. The mother of the plaintiff was a minor at the date of the deed, and married during her minority and died during minority, leaving one child, who is the present plaintiff. Whether her husband, one Owens, survived her, is not stated. It is held in *Dyer v. Brannock,*66 Mo. 422, that the tenancy by courtesy of the husband stopped the running of the statute of limitations, but in this petition *174it is not said whether the husband of Virginia Kirkpatrick, the mother of the plaintiff, is alive yet, or dead. If he is still living, it is obvious that the plaintiffs have no right of action, and if he died before his wife, it is plain they have none, as the twenty-six years never interrupted, would be a bar. If he survived his wife, the action is not necessarily barred, unless he is still living. How the facts are is not stated in the petition. The plaintiffs may have a good cause of action, or they may not. It is certainly the business of a plaintiff’ to state facts sufficient to show a cause of action. In this case it is impossible to say whether she has a good cause of action or not. It does not appear that she has no cause of action, nor does it appear that she has. The judgment on the demurrer is, therefore, affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

          - [File No. 500-1] 

                    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of                           ( print page 57587)                        Geographics, Inc. (n/k/a G Printing, Inc.) because it has not filed any periodic reports since the period ended December 31, 2001.                 

It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of Window Rock Capital Corp. (n/k/a Window Rock Capital Holdings, Inc.) because it has filed only one periodic report, a Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2005, in the last three years. 

The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the securities of the above-listed companies. 

Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the above-listed companies is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. EDT on September 27, 2006, through 11:59 p.m. EDT on October 10, 2006. 

By the Commission. 

Nancy M. Morris, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 06-8396 Filed 9-27-06; 11:58 am] 

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
### Exhibit 31.2

### Certification under Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of

### William N. Hagler, President, Director

I, William N. Hagler, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of
Intermountain Refining Co., Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I
are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
small business issuer and have:

> Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
> such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
> ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, is made
> known to us by others within the entity, particularly during the period in which
> this report is being prepared;
> Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
> disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
> about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
> of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
> Disclosed in this report any change in the small business
> issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
> small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or
> is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's control
> over financial reporting; and

1. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I
have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the small
business issuer's board of directors:

> All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
> design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
> reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to
> record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
> Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
> or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
> internal control over financial
> reporting.

Date: January 14, 2008/s/_William N.
Hagler________William N. Hagler, President,
Director
Case 16-30372 Doc 1 Filed 09/23/16 Entered 09/23/16 14:43:44 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 8
Case 16-30372 Doc 1 Filed 09/23/16 Entered 09/23/16 14:43:44 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 8
Case 16-30372 Doc 1 Filed 09/23/16 Entered 09/23/16 14:43:44 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 8
Case 16-30372 Doc 1 Filed 09/23/16 Entered 09/23/16 14:43:44 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 8
Case 16-30372 Doc 1 Filed 09/23/16 Entered 09/23/16 14:43:44 Desc Main

 Document Page 5 of 8
Case 16-30372 Doc 1 Filed 09/23/16 Entered 09/23/16 14:43:44 Desc Main

 Document Page 6 of 8
Case 16-30372 Doc 1 Filed 09/23/16 Entered 09/23/16 14:43:44 Desc Main

 Document Page 7 of 8
Case 16-30372 Doc 1 Filed 09/23/16 Entered 09/23/16 14:43:44 Desc Main

 Document Page 8 of 8
**OFFICE OF**  **THE ATTORNEY**  **GENERAL OF**  **TEXAS AUSTIN**  **I1 OROVER**  **SELLERS ATrORNLY** 

**GENER&**

## Iiononblo 

# T. M. ‘Mmblo, page 2

are roqulnd 

# to do, and mu8t 

## lwvo l 

## vldmme of pryfiCitUl0~ iii Nnl 

## mhool **8U~Z ’** **Ti8;~ and**  **-8t b8**  

## the 

## holder of at lu8t l 

## Ewhalor of Soleaoo %gnr or 

## -j hlghor. Such 8UpW'Vi8Ol' 

## Or **a~PV18Ol ’** **W =J**  

### IWWiVB **Of 5Ot**  **t0 UC0.d**  **%+VOBtJ-8iI tburdrvd**  **blbX.8** 

# I' azLau, to k mid **Out Oi**  **the 8W**  

### flUad **and ’** **ln the**  **aawmaanoP8m thtoitha**  

# County SuporlntOlldOSit

**Of** 

# F'ublio

b8tl'Wt~lon

aad **0th.P &88;8tNt8.**  **’**
**A8 VO**  **CoPstFW SrLd**  **SW3tiOS 2,**  **8Upm. th.**  **8ChOQ ’** **l 8-W**  

## visor amtimed thanin **18** 

## not a public offioormvlth 8 dmflnite **fiXOd** 

### t.rP **but 18**  

# lWF.17 Ub **-lOJW.**

**very tml~**  **youril,** 

## ASTORXXY

**aBmERALoFTxxAs**
#### § 34.4 Eligibility of areas.

In order to receive payments under the Act, a county must qualify under the definition in § 34.3(c) of this part and there must be located within the county, areas of land owned in fee title by the United States and administered by the Secretary of the Interior through the Fish and Wildlife Service, including wildlife refuges, waterfowl production areas, wildlife ranges, wildlife management areas, fish hatcheries, research centers or stations, and administrative sites, and these areas must be solely or primarily administered by the Service. In addition to this Act, reserve areas administered solely or primarily by the Service are entitlement lands under section 6(a) of the Act of October 29, 1976 (Pub. L. 94-565, 31 U.S.C. 1601-1607), for which regulations are published in title 43, part 1880, Code of Federal Regulations.
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida 

Opinion filed February 2, 2022.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D21-1194

Lower Tribunal No. 21-FH0743

________________

V.T.,

Appellant,

vs.

Liberty Dental Plan of Florida, Inc.,

Appellee.

An appeal from the State of Florida Agency for Health Care 

Administration, Office of Fair Hearings.

V.T., in proper person.

Ausley McMullen, and Erik M. Figlio, and Alexandra E. Akre 

(Tallahassee), for appellee.

Before LOGUE, MILLER, and LOBREE, JJ. 

MILLER, J.
2

Appellant, V.T., a Medicaid recipient under a plan administered by 

Liberty Dental, challenges a final order of the Agency for Health Care 

Administration (the “Agency”) dismissing her request for a Medicaid Fair 

Hearing. Because the Agency received appellant’s request 141 days after 

Liberty Dental denied her appeal and issued a Notice of Plan Appeal 

Resolution (“NPAR”), along with information regarding the right to request a 

fair hearing, and appellant’s initial brief fails to identify any specific error 

below, we affirm the order under review. See Fla. Admin. Code R. 59G1.100(8)(g) (“A fair hearing request by an enrollee must be received by the 

Agency within 120 days of the date the required NPAR is sent to the 

enrollee.”); Fla. Admin. Code R. 59G-1.100(9)(b)3. (“A Hearing Officer is 

authorized to deny or dismiss a request for a fair hearing for reasons 

consistent with this rule, including the following: . . . [a] fair hearing request 

is untimely.”); see also Hoskins v. State, 75 So. 3d 250, 257 (Fla. 2011) 

(“[T]his argument was not raised in the initial brief filed here. Accordingly, 

the claim is barred.”); Tillery v. Fla. Dep’t of Juv. Just., 104 So. 3d 1253, 

1255–56 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013) (holding that an argument not raised in an 

initial brief is waived).

Affirmed.
CERTIFICATIONI, Kokmeng Koh, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-Drequired to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K ofPrincipal Life Income Fundings Trust 2006-41 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);  2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as whole, donot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;  3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and otherinformation required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by thisreport is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;  4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required inthis report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the ExchangeAct period reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicingagreement(s) in all material respects; and  5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria forasset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment ofcompliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be includedin this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwisedisclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in suchreports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by thefollowing unaffiliated parties: Citibank, N.A. and Bankers Trust Company, N.A.Date: March 28, 2007   /s/ Kokmeng Koh     Kokmeng Koh  Second Vice President
§ 18.4 What determinations must the Director make before leasing property? Before leasing property in a park area under this part, the Director must determine that: ( a ) The lease will not result in degradation of the purposes and values of the park area;
( b ) The lease will not deprive the park area of property necessary for appropriate park protection, interpretation, visitor enjoyment, or administration of the park area;
( c ) The lease contains such terms and conditions as will assure the leased property will be used for activity and in a manner that are consistent with the purposes established by law for the park area in which the property is located;
( d ) The lease is compatible with the programs of the National Park Service;
( e ) The lease is for rent at least equal to the fair market value rent of the leased property as described in § 18.5;
( f ) The proposed activities under the lease are not subject to authorization through a concession contract, commercial use authorization or similar instrument; and
( g ) If the lease is to include historic property, the lease will adequately insure the preservation of the historic property.