alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### STATE OF VERMONT v. WALTER MARTIN, APT.

October Term, 1895.

*Appealfrom justice judgment does not vacate plea oj guilty.*

If a respondent pleads guilty before a justice and then appeals from the judgment, the county court may in its discretion allow the respondent to withdraw such plea, or enter judgment upon the same.

Complaint for furnishing intoxicating liquor, brought before a justice of the peace. Before the justice the respondent plead guilty and appealed from the judgment to the county court. In that court he moved to withdraw his said plea. Heard upon such motion at the March term, 1895, Rutland county, Thompson, J., presiding. The court denied the motion and gave judgment and sentence on the plea. The respondent excepts.

*J. M. Slade*for the respondent.

The appeal vacated all the proceedings before the justice and the cause stood *de novo*in the county court. R. L., ss. 1673, 1676; Chitty Crim. Law 418.

The respondent’s request for leave to replead should have been granted as a matter of course. *Wickwire*v. *State,*19 Conn. 477; *People*v. *Richmond,*57 Mich. 399; *State*v.- *Stephen,*71 Mo. 535.

*J. C. fones,*state’s attorney, for the state.

*92Whether a respondent shall have leave to withdraw his-plea of guilty is discretionary with the court. *Clark*v. State, 31 Atl. Rep. 979.

TAFT, J.

The respondent Martin was complained of before a justice of the peace for the unlawful sale of intoxicating liquors, pleaded guilty and took an appeal to the county court. He there moved to withdraw his plea, and plead not guilty, and offered testimony to show that such had been the settled practice of the county courts for the last ten years and the settled practice of many of the courts. The court excluded the testimony, denied the motion and rendered judgment of guilty on the plea. The plea was upon the record before the court and as much a part of it as the complaint itself. Whether the respondent should be permitted to withdraw it and plead anew, was a matter of discretion to be exercised by the county court. The case of *State*v. Little, 42 Vt. 430, simply holds that a respondent after a plea of guilty before a justice of the peace is entitled to an appeal. The question in this case did not arise in that.

*A majority of the court direct the judgment that there is no error in the proceedings and*the. *respondent take nothing by his exceptions.*

*A*like case against John Sheridan, and a case against the respondent Martin for owning, keeping and possessing intoxicating liquors with intent to unlawfully sell them, were heard at the same time and are disposed of in like manner, for like reasons.

Munson, J., absent in county court.
SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NINETY-NINTH CONGRESS

Convened January 3, 1985

FIRST SESSION { Adjourned December 20, 1985

Convened January 21, 1986

SECOND SESSION {

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR

F rid a y , J u ly 25, 1986

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF JO-ANNE L. COE, 

SECRETARY OF THE SENATE

By Gerald A. Hackett, Executive Clerk
RESOLUTION OVER, UNDER THE RULE

S. Exec. Res. 445—To discharge the Committee on Foreign Relations of further 

consideration of the SALT II Treaty. Submitted July 15, 1986, by Mr. Quayle.
1

TREATIES

Calendar Treaty Subject Reported

No. Doc. No. Bv

5 EX. Q, Tax Convention with Denmark Dec 11, 85 Reported

96-2 favorably, with a 

resolution of advice and 

consent to ratification 

without reservation, by 

Mr. Evans, Committee on 

Foreign Relations (Printed 

report—Ex. Rept. 99-5)

6 98-12 Protocol to Amend the 1980 Tax Convention Do.

with Denmark

NOMINATIONS

Calendar

No.

Message

No.

Nominee, Office, And Predecessor Reported 

-....... By

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

* 823 802 Morton I. Abramowitz, of Massachusetts, a 

Career Member of the Senior Foreign 

Service, Class of Career Minister, to be 

an Assistant Secretary of State. (New 

Position)

May 20, 86 Mr. Lugar, 

Committee on Foreign 

Relations, with printed 

report - Ex.Rept. 99-14. 

Together with minority 

views.

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

* 895 957 George R. Salem, of Virginia, to be 

Solicitor for the Department of Labor, 

vice Francis X. Lilly, resigned.

Jun 18, 86 Mr. Hatch, 

Committee on Labor and 

Human Resources, without 

printed report
2

Calendar

No.

Message

No.

Nominee, Office, And Predecessor Reported

Bv

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

* 915 1047 M. D. B. Carlisle, of the District of 

Columbia, to be an Assistant Secretary of 

Defense, vice Russell A. Rourke, resigned.

Jun 25, 86 Mr. Warner, 

Committee on Armed’ 

Services, without printed 

report

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

* 930 1162 Kathleen W. Lawrence, of Virginia, to be 

Under Secretary of Agriculture for Small 

Community and Rural Development, vice 

Frank W. Naylor, Jr.

Jul 16, 86 Mr. Helms, 

Committee on Agriculture, 

Nutrition, and Forestry, 

without printed report.

* 931 1163 Kathleen W. Lawrence, of Virginia, to be a 

Member of the Board of Directors of the 

Commodity Credit Corporation, vice Frank 

W. Naylor, Jr.

__/ _ _. . . . . . - » __ . #

Do.

*S ignifies nominee's commitment to respond to requests to appear and testify before any duly

constituted committee of the Senate.
3

NOMINATIONS PLACED ON THE SECRETARY’ S DESK IN THE SENIOR FOREIGN

SERVICE

Senior Foreign Service nomination of Edwin G. Corr, which was received by the Senate and 

appeared in the Congressional Record of October 28, 1985.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel, Conference Grants Review.                    

*Date:*                         October 20, 2006.                    

*Time:*                         1 p.m. to 3 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Two Democracy Plaza, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Atul Sahai, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Review Branch, DEA, NIDDK, National Institutes of Health, Room 908, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892-5452, 301-594-2242,                         *sahaia@niddk.nih.gov.*

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

      ( print page 61783)    
Dated: October 10, 2006.

Linda Payne,

Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 06-8772  Filed 10-18-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### § 11.2 Uses.

The Director may permit the reproduction, manufacture, sale, and use of the “Arrowhead Symbol” or the “Parkscape Symbol”, with or without charge, for uses that will contribute to purposes of education and conservation as they relate to the program of the National Park Service. All other uses are prohibited.

[36 FR 16508, Aug. 21, 1971]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 24-1195

RONALD SATISH EMRIT,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

SEAN COMBS, a/k/a P. Diddy; BAD BOY ENTERTAINMENT; ATLANTIC 

RECORDS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at 

Charlottesville. Robert S. Ballou, District Judge. (3:24-cv-00005-RSB-JCH)

Submitted: May 21, 2024 Decided: May 24, 2024

Before WYNN and BENJAMIN, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronald Satish Emrit, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 24-1195 Doc: 6 Filed: 05/24/2024 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Ronald Satish Emrit appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice 

his civil complaint for lack of standing.

*

 We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Emrit v. Combs, 

No. 3:24-cv-00005-RSB-JCH (W.D. Va. Mar. 5, 2024). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* The dismissal order is final and appealable because the district court did not grant 

leave to amend. Britt v. Dejoy, 45 F.4th 790, 791 (4th Cir. 2022) (en banc) (order). 

USCA4 Appeal: 24-1195 Doc: 6 Filed: 05/24/2024 Pg: 2 of 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management

          - [NV-055-5853-EU]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Department of the Interior.

# ACTION:

 Withdraw of Notice Published on October 12, 2006.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Bureau of Land Management Las Vegas Field Office is withdrawing the                         **Federal Register**                         Notice published on October 12, 2006 on the Proposed Information Collection Notice of Request for Comments. This Proposed Information Collection Notice of Request for Comments will be published at a later date.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        You may contact Gayle Marrs-Smith, Project Manager at (702) 515-5156, or by e-mail at                         *Gayle_Marrs-Smith@nv.blm.gov.*

Dated: October 11, 2006

Juan Palma, 

Field Manager, Las Vegas Field Office.

[FR Doc. 06-8819 Filed 10-23-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-HC-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration 

          - 14 CFR Part 23 

# AGENCY:

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. 

# ACTION:

Correcting amendment. 

# SUMMARY:

                        This document makes a correction to the final rule published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on August 6, 1993 (58 FR 42165). That rule changed airframe and flight airworthiness standards for normal, utility, acrobatic and commuter category airplanes.                     

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         This correction is effective on January 5, 2006.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Joan Allen, telephone (202) 267-7037. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

 

## Need for Correction 

As published, the final regulation contains an error which may be misleading and needs to be clarified. 

# List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 23

      - Aircraft
      - Aviation safety
      - Signs and symbols

Accordingly, 14 CFR part 23 is corrected by making the following correcting amendment: 

1. The authority citation for part 23 continues to read as follows: 

Authority:49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701-44702, 44704.

2. Revise paragraph (b) of § 23.773 to read as follows: 

§ 23.773 

* * * * *

(b) Each pilot compartment must have a means to either remove or prevent the formation of fog or frost on an area of the internal portion of the windshield and side windows sufficiently large to provide the view specified in paragraph (a)(1) of this section. Compliance must be shown under all expected external and internal ambient operating conditions, unless it can be shown that the windshield and side windows can be easily cleared by the pilot without interruption of normal pilot duties. 

Issued in Washington, DC, on December 29, 2005. 

Anthony F. Fazio, 

Director, Office of Rulemaking. 

[FR Doc. 06-85 Filed 1-4-06; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
~rttatr nf tqr luitrb itatts 

NINETIETH CONGRESS 

FIRST SrSSION-Began January 10, 1967 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Prepared unde1 the dttection of FRANCIS R VALEO, Secretary of the Senate 

By GERALD A HACKETT, Executive Clerk 

Tuesda), December 5, 1967 

TREATY 

Date of !Calendar Treat~ '\o Subject Action of committee 

report ~~-------- -----------------l----------

1967 I I 

Dec 4 25 I I 

I 

Ex K (90th Cong , 

1'Jt ,es..,) 

85- 022--67--No 113 

Protocol for the further prolongatiOn of the 

Iutf'tnatwnal Sugar <\greement of 1958 

Reported favorably by 

Mr Sparkman, from 

t he Comm1ttee on 

Forergn Relat10ns, 

wtth a prmted report 

(See Ex Rept No 

19, 90th Cong , 1st 

sees) 

"S GOYERNIIIENT PRINTING> OFFICE lt6
# EUR-Lex - 12006E067 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12006E067

**Treaty establishing the European Community (consolidated version) - Part Three - Community policies - TITLE IV - Visas, asylum, immigration and other policies related to free movement of persons - Article 67 **

*
Official Journal C 321 E , 29/12/2006 P. 0069 - 0070 Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0060 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0203 - Consolidated version *

Article 67

1. During a transitional period of five years following the entry into force of the Treaty of Amsterdam, the Council shall act unanimously on a proposal from the Commission or on the initiative of a Member State and after consulting the European Parliament.

2. After this period of five years:

- the Council shall act on proposals from the Commission; the Commission shall examine any request made by a Member State that it submit a proposal to the Council,

- the Council, acting unanimously after consulting the European Parliament, shall take a decision with a view to providing for all or parts of the areas covered by this title to be governed by the procedure referred to in Article 251 and adapting the provisions relating to the powers of the Court of Justice.

3. By derogation from paragraphs 1 and 2, measures referred to in Article 62(2)(b) (i) and (iii) shall, from the entry into force of the Treaty of Amsterdam, be adopted by the Council acting by a qualified majority on a proposal from the Commission and after consulting the European Parliament.

4. By derogation from paragraph 2, measures referred to in Article 62(2)(b) (ii) and (iv) shall, after a period of five years following the entry into force of the Treaty of Amsterdam, be adopted by the Council acting in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 251.

5. By derogation from paragraph 1, the Council shall adopt, in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 251:

- the measures provided for in Article 63(1) and (2)(a) provided that the Council has previously adopted, in accordance with paragraph 1 of this Article, Community legislation defining the common rules and basic principles governing these issues,

- the measures provided for in Article 65 with the exception of aspects relating to family law.

--------------------------------------------------
REYNALDO R. CATO

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 16

- 3057

________ _____________________/

Opinion filed October 7, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Waddell A. Wallace , Judge

.

Reynaldo R. Cato, pro se , Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

MAKAR, KELSEY, and WINSOR, JJ., CONCUR.
§ 294.13 Petition process. ( a ) Review and consideration of petitions made pursuant to § 294.12 shall be accomplished as follows: ( 1 ) *Review.* The Secretary shall review petitions and may request additional information from a petitioner before deciding whether to accept the petition. If the Secretary requests additional information from a petitioner, the petition will be considered complete when the petitioner provides the additional information.
( 2 ) *Disposition.* The Secretary or the Secretary's designee shall respond to the petition within 180 days of receipt of a completed petition. The response shall accept or decline the petition to initiate a State-specific rulemaking.
Date: July I, 2014 

~r. Fred Leutner 

SENECA-CAYUGA NATION 

23701 S. 655 Road, Hwy 10 

Grove, Oklahoma 74344 

(918) 787-5452 

FAX: (918) 787-9440 

Office of Science & Technology (Mail Code 4305T) 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington DC 20460 

Email: Leutner.Fred@epa.gov 

RE: Potential Reinterpretation of the Clean Water Act (CWA) Provisions regarding Treatment in a Similar 

~anner to States (T AS). 

Dear Mr. Leutner: 

It has come to the Seneca-Cayuga Nation's attention that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is 

considering a Reinterpretation of the rules governing the burden placed on Tribes applying forT AS under the 

CWA for Section 303(c), Water Quality Standards. Currently, Tribes must demonstrate their own inherent 

regulatory authority, which is challenging and resource intensive. This burden alone has cost Tribes both time 

and funds to meet this requirement. The potential reinterpretation which would eliminate the "Montana Tesf ' by 

stating that CW A Section 518 is a delegation by Congress to eligible Tribes to administer CW A regulatory 

programs over their entire reservations regardless of land ownership will allow Tribes to exercise their 

sovereignty by our ability and willingness to accept this delegation. 

The Seneca-Cayuga Nation believes EPA's reinterpretation will clarify and strengthen the inherent regulatory 

authority of sovereign tribes to implement EPA statutes within reservations regardless of land ownership. 

Reinterpretation would validate the legal basis for tribal assertion of regulatory jurisdiction under the CW A and 

decrease the administrative burden of case-by-case assessments of tribal authority. 

As Tribal leader ofthe Seneca-Cayuga Nation, I support the EPA's efforts to reinterpret provisions ofthe CWA 

regarding the TAS process. Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments on this potential ru le change. 

Respectfully, 

W

f)~~ illiam Fisher I Chief 

Seneca-Cayuga Nation 

23701 S. 655 Road, Hwy 10 

Grove, Oklahoma 74344 

Email: \vfisher@sctribe.com
#### § 20.25 Wanton waste of migratory game birds.

No person shall kill or cripple any migratory game bird pursuant to this part without making a reasonable effort to retrieve the bird, and retain it in his actual custody, at the place where taken or between that place and either (a) his automobile or principal means of land transportation; or (b) his personal abode or temporary or transient place of lodging; or (c) a migratory bird preservation facility; or (d) a post office; or (e) a common carrier facility.

[41 FR 31536, July 29, 1976]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-2075

CALVIN EARL BROWN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

INTERNAL REVENUE,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-97-68-4-H)

Submitted: January 15, 1998 Decided: January 28, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Calvin Earl Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan Samuel Cohen, UNITED

STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his

civil action. We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the

reasoning of the district court. Brown v. IRS, No. CA-97-68-4-H

(E.D.N.C. Aug. 7, 1997). We deny Appellant's motion for "Service of

Civil Contempt" and dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED