alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Pauline Rosenthal, Appellant, v. New York, Susquehanna and Western Railroad Company, Respondent.

(Argued May 9, 1907;

decided May 28, 1907.)

*Rosenthal*v. *W. T., Susquehanna & W. R. R. Co.,*112 App. Div. 436, affirmed.

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered May 5, 1906, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at a Trial Term in an action to' recover for personal injuries alleged to have been occasioned through defendant’s negligence.

*T. B.*Chancellor, *TV. M. H. Olcott*and *Henderson Peck*for appellant;

*Frederic B. Jennings*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Gray, O’Brien, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ. Absent: Cullen, Ch. J.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>		5

<S>	                         				<C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>		                	12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>	            		MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>		               	APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>		                 	MAR-31-1999
<CASH>			                      	175,256
<SECURITIES>		                  	0
<RECEIVABLES>		                	937,479
<ALLOWANCES>		                  	0
<INVENTORY>			                  	0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>		           	1,450,286
<PP&E>			                    	1,160,430
<DEPRECIATION>		             	(348,734)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>		             	2,509,239
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>	         	408,712
<BONDS>			                      	0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY> 	         	0
<PREFERRED>			                  	0
<COMMON>			                    	555,177
<OTHER-SE>		                		1,545,350
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 	2,509,239
<SALES>			                   	3,072,236
<TOTAL-REVENUES>		           	3,072,236
<CGS>				                       	0
<TOTAL-COSTS>		                 	0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>		           	2,432,984
<LOSS-PROVISION>		              	0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>	             	0
<INCOME-PRETAX>		              	639,252
<INCOME-TAX>		                 	260,294
<INCOME-CONTINUING>	           	378,958
<DISCONTINUED>		                	0
<EXTRAORDINARY>		               	0
<CHANGES>			                    	0
<NET-INCOME>		                 	378,958
<EPS-BASIC>		                	.49
<EPS-DILUTED>		                	.49
| ·   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| ·   | The      information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the      financial condition and results of operations of the    Company. |
|--------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                   |   |                                                                    |
|------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                   |   |                                                                    |   |
| November      14, 2008 | By:    | /s/                                                                |   |
|                   |   | Terry      Lee                                                          |   |
|                   |   | Chief      Executive Officer and Chairman (Principal Executive Officer) |   |
|                   |   |                                                                    |   |
#### § 703.19 Requests for authenticated copies of Library documents.

Requests for authenticated copies of Library documents for purposes of admissibility under 28 U.S.C. 1733 and Rule 44 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure will be granted for documents that would otherwise be released pursuant to the Library's Regulations governing the release of information. The advice of the appropriate deciding official should be obtained concerning the proper form of authentication and information as to the proper person having custody of the record.
RICHARD WILLIAM 

HEAGNEY,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D13-3823

_____________________________/

Opinion filed September 23, 2014.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County.

Mark W. Moseley, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Glen P. Gifford, Assistant Public 

Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Justin D. Chapman, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, ROWE, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., CONCUR.
#### § 1150.4 Definitions.

*A&TBCB* means the Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board.

*Agency* means Federal department, agency, or instrumentality as defined in sections 551(1) and 701(b)(1) of title 5 U.S.C., or an agency official authorized to represent the agency. It includes any executive department or independent establishment in the Executive Branch of the government, including wholly owned government corporations, and any establishment in the legislative or judicial branch of the government, except the Senate, the House of Representatives, and the Architect of the Capitol and any activities under his direction.

*Alteration* means any change in a building or facility or its permanent fixtures or equipment. It includes, but is not limited to, remodeling, renovation, rehabilitation, reconstruction, changes or rearrangement in structural parts, and extraordinary repairs. It does not include normal maintenance, reroofing, interior decoration, or changes to mechanical systems.

*Architectural Barriers Act* means the Architectural Barriers Act of 1968, Pub. L. 90-480, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 4151 *et seq.*

*Building or facility* means all or any portion of buildings, structures, equipment, roads, walks, parking lots, parks, sites, or other real property or interest in such property.

*Chair* means the Chair of the A&TBCB.

*Complaint* means any written notice of an alleged violation, whether from an individual or organization, or other written information reasonably indicating to the Executive Director a violation of the standard.

*Construction* means any section of a new building or an addition to an existing building.

*Day* means calendar day.

*Executive Director* means the A&TBCB Executive Director.

*Extraordinary repair* means the replacement or renewal of any element of an existing building or facility for purposes other than normal maintenance.

*Judge* means an Administrative Law Judge appointed by the A&TBCB and assigned to the case in accordance with either section 3105 or 3314 of title 5 U.S.C.

*PER* means Provisional Expedited Relief.

*Respondent* means a party answering the citation, including PER Citation.

*Section 502 of the Rehabilitation Act* means section 502 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Pub. L. 93-112, 29 U.S.C. 792, as amended.

*Standard* means any standard for accessibility and usability prescribed under the Architectural Barriers Act.

[53 FR 39473, Oct. 7, 1988]
Exhibit
      32


Section
      1350 Certifications




**STATEMENT
      FURNISHED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





The
      undersigned is the Chief Executive Officer and Treasurer or Principal Accounting
      Officer of Thorium Power, Ltd. This Certification is made pursuant to Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This Certification accompanies the
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Thorium Power, Ltd. for the six months ended
      June 30, 2008.





The
      undersigned certifies that such 10-Q Report fully complies with the requirements
      of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
      information contained in such 10-Q Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Thorium Power,
      Ltd. as of June 30, 2008.





This
      Certification is executed as of August 13, 2008.





*By:
                /s/ Seth Grae**Name:
                Seth Grae**Title:
                President, Chief Executive Officer and Director**(Principal
                Executive Officer)****By:
                /s/ James Guerra**Name:
                James Guerra**Title:
                Chief Financial Officer**(Principal
                Financial Officer)*




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Thorium Power, Ltd. and will be retained by Thorium Power and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.2 SECTION
1350 CERTIFICATION Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, I, Jane Morlok, Chief Financial Officer of Breda
Telephone Corp., certify that to my knowledge (i) Breda Telephone Corp.s
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 (the Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Breda Telephone Corp. Date:  May 14,
2007. /s/ Jane MorlokJane Morlok, Chief
  Financial Office E-14
# Continuation of the National Emergency With Respect to Significant Narcotics Traffickers Centered in Colombia

On October 21, 1995, by Executive Order 12978, the President declared a national emergency pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701-1706) to deal with the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States constituted by the actions of significant narcotics traffickers centered in Colombia, and the extreme level of violence, corruption, and harm such actions cause in the United States and abroad. 

The order blocks all property and interests in property that are in the United States, or within the possession or control of United States persons, of foreign persons listed in an annex to the order, as well as of foreign persons determined to play a significant role in international narcotics trafficking centered in Colombia. The order similarly blocks all property and interests in property of foreign persons determined to materially assist in, or provide financial or technological support for or goods or services in support of, the narcotics trafficking activities of persons designated in or pursuant to the order. In addition, the order blocks all property and interests in property of persons determined to be owned or controlled by, or to act for or on behalf of, persons designated in or pursuant to the order. The order also prohibits any transaction or dealing by United States persons or within the United States in property or interests in property of the persons designated in or pursuant to the order. 

                        Because the actions of significant narcotics traffickers centered in Colombia continue to threaten the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States and to cause an extreme level of violence, corruption, and harm in the United States and abroad, the national emergency declared on October 21, 1995, and the measures adopted pursuant thereto to deal with that emergency, must continue in effect beyond October 21, 2006. Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies                               ( print page 62054)    

                        Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing for 1 year the national emergency with respect to significant narcotics traffickers centered in Colombia. This notice shall be published in the                         **Federal Register**                         and transmitted to the Congress.                    

[FR Doc. 06-8840

Billing code 3195-01-P
##### 



Exhibit 10.37
AMENDMENT NO. 1
TO THE
TANDY BRANDS ACCESSORIES, INC.
2002 OMNIBUS PLAN
       Grant Upon Election or Appointment as a Non-employee Director
  Annual Grants to Non-employee Directors
     1




---



##### 



ATTEST:
    
    
    
    TANDY BRANDS ACCESSORIES, INC./s/ W. Mike Baggett
    
    
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Mark J. FlahertySecretary
    
    
    
    
    
    Name:
Title:
    
    Mark J. Flaherty Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and
Assistant Secretary
 2
§ 254.16 Case closing. ( a ) *Title transfers.* Unless otherwise agreed, and notwithstanding the decision in *United States* v. *Schurz,* 102 U.S. 378 (1880), or any other law or ruling to the contrary, title to both the non-Federal and Federal lands pass simultaneously and are deemed accepted by the United States and the non-Federal landowner, respectively, when the documents of conveyance are recorded in the county clerk's or other local recorder's office. Before recordation, all instructions, requirements, and conditions set forth by the United States and the non-Federal landowner must be met. The minimum requirements and conditions necessary for recordation include the following, as appropriate: ( 1 ) The determination by the authorized officer that the United States will receive possession, acceptable to it, of such lands;
( 2 ) The issuance of title evidence as of the date of recordation which conforms to the instructions and requirements of the USDA Office of the General Counsel's preliminary title opinion; and
( 3 ) Continuation searches disclosing no matters of record that would require any change in the aforementioned title evidence as issued.
( b ) *Automatic segregation of lands.* Subject to valid existing rights, non-Federal lands acquired through exchange by the United States automatically are segregated from appropriation under the public land laws and mineral laws until midnight of the 90th day after acceptance of title by the United States, and the public land records must be noted accordingly. Thereafter, the lands will be open automatically to operation of the public land laws and mineral laws, except to the extent otherwise provided by law, unless action is taken pursuant to 43 CFR part 2300 to initiate a withdrawal within the 90-day period.
118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 612 

AN ACT 

To reauthorize the Lake Tahoe Restoration Act, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 612 ES

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Lake Tahoe Restora3 tion Reauthorization Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF THE LAKE TAHOE RESTORA5 TION ACT. 

6 (a) COOPERATIVE AUTHORITIES.—Section 4(f) of the 

7 Lake Tahoe Restoration Act (Public Law 106–506) is 

8 amended by striking ‘‘4 fiscal years following the date of 

9 enactment of the Water Resources Development Act of 

10 2016’’ and inserting ‘‘period beginning on the date of en11 actment of this subsection and ending on the date de12 scribed in section 10(a)’’. 

13 (b) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Section 

14 10(a) of the Lake Tahoe Restoration Act (Public Law 

15 106–506) is amended by striking ‘‘for a period’’ and all 

16 that follows through the period at the end and inserting 

17 ‘‘, to remain available until September 30, 2034.’’. 

Passed the Senate July 10, 2024. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 612 

AN ACT 

To reauthorize the Lake Tahoe Restoration Act, 

and for other purposes.
EXHIBIT 32.1


                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
                       as adopted pursuant to Section 906
                        of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of AngelCiti Entertainment, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, George
Gutierrez, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.




Dated: May 12, 2006                    /s/ George Gutierrez
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       George Gutierrez, Chief Executive Officer
                                       and Chief Financial Officer
# EUR-Lex - 12004V136 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V136

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART III — THE POLICIES AND FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - TITLE III — INTERNAL POLICIES AND ACTION - CHAPTER I — INTERNAL MARKET - Section 2 — Free movement of persons and services - Subsection 1 — Workers - Article III-136 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0060 - 0060 *

Article III-136

1. In the field of social security, European laws or framework laws shall establish such measures as are necessary to bring about freedom of movement for workers by making arrangements to secure for employed and self-employed migrant workers and their dependants:

(a) aggregation, for the purpose of acquiring and retaining the right to benefit and of calculating the amount of benefit, of all periods taken into account under the laws of the different countries;

(b) payment of benefits to persons resident in the territories of Member States.

2. Where a member of the Council considers that a draft European law or framework law referred to in paragraph 1 would affect fundamental aspects of its social security system, including its scope, cost or financial structure, or would affect the financial balance of that system, it may request that the matter be referred to the European Council. In that case, the procedure referred to in Article III-396 shall be suspended. After discussion, the European Council shall, within four months of this suspension, either:

(a) refer the draft back to the Council, which shall terminate the suspension of the procedure referred to in Article III-396, or

(b) request the Commission to submit a new proposal; in that case, the act originally proposed shall be deemed not to have been adopted.

--------------------------------------------------
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of
Lynx Acquisition, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Scott Baily, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
my knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






/s/
      Scott Baily
              Scott
      Baily
              Principal
      Financial Officer
              March
      31, 2009
<PAGE>
                                                                 EXHIBIT 23.1



                               CONSENT OF KPMG LLP

The Board of Directors
SPSS Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Nos. 333-90694, 333-87374, 333-57168, 333-45900, 333-25869, 33-73130, 33-80799,
33-73120, 333-63167, 33-74402 and 333-75674) on Form S-8, and the registration
statements (Nos. 333-41207, 333-21025, 333-10423, 333-30460, 333-74944 and
333-71236) on Form S-3, of our report dated March 28, 2003, except as to Note
12, which is as of April 1, 2003, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of
SPSS Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001 and 2002, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss),
stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended December 31, 2002, and the related consolidated financial statement
schedule, which report appears in the December 31, 2002 annual report on Form
10-K of SPSS Inc.

Our report refers to a change in the Company's method of accounting for goodwill
in 2002.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Chicago, Illinois
April 1, 2003
February 7, 2011

Dr. Holly Stallworth

Designated Federal Office
Science Advisory Board
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20004

Dear Dr. Stallworth:

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)’s proposed new National Ambient Air Quality
Standards (NAAQS) for ozone will hurt manufacturers’ ability to create jobs and compete in the

global marketplace. The proposal would lower the current standard of 75 parts per billion (ppb)

to a range between 70 p pb and 60 ppb. This will result in significant costs, increased regulations

and job losses.

Manufacturers are troubled that the EPA is proposing a new standard only two years after

establishing the 75 ppb standard in 2008. According to a recent study by t he Manufacturers Alliance (MAPI), lowering the current standard would cost 7.3 million jobs by 2020 and add $1

trillion in new regulatory burdens between 2020 and 2030. In addition, a new standard would

place many counties in our nation in violation of the requirements of the Clean Air Act. This will

significantly hurt large and small businesses and hinder economic growth in many states.

Now is not the time to put even more high

- paying manufacturing jobs at stake.

I strongly urge the CASAC Panel to recomm end that the EPA not adopt this new, more stringent

ozone standard.

Sincerely,

Kimberly Korbel
American Wire Producers Association (AWPA)
#### Buffalo County, appellee, v. Joel Hull, appellant.

Filed June 16, 1913.

No. 17,148.

Opinion on motion, for rehearing of ease reported in 93 Neb. 586.

*Rehearing denied.*

Sedgwick, J.

The brief upon the motion for rehearing points out two mistakes in the opinion. 93 Neb. 586.

1. The first one of them is that the opinion says that the bridge was built in 1874, and also says that the act of 1879 was in force when the bridge was built. The point in mind was that the statute of 1881 was treated by Judge Maxwell in the opinion in *State v. Kearney County,*12 Neb. 6, as controlling, although it was enacted a long time after the bridge was built; and the opinion in this case is all predicated on the statement therein: “The liability of adjoining counties for repairs of a bridge over a stream betwen them is fixed by statute, and it is within the poAver of the legislature to alter or amend the statute in that regard. The conditions and extent of the liability depend upon the statute in force when such repairs are made and the liability incurred.” 93 Neb. 586. This was what Judge Maxwell held in 12 Neb., the case upon which this defendant relied. The error in stating that the act of 1879 was in force in 1874 is quite immaterial to the merits of the case.

2. The second error is that it is stated that the repairs involved in this case were made in 1894. This is a typographical error for 1904. The proceedings were begun in 1904 and the repairs ordered, but it appears they were not actually made until 1905. This typographical error is immaterial to the merits of the case.

The motion for rehearing is

Overruled.