alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EUR-Lex - 12005SP031 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12005SP031

**Protocol concerning the conditions and arrangements for admission of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania to the European Union - PART FOUR:TEMPORARY PROVISIONS - TITLE III:FINANCIAL PROVISIONS - Article 31 **

*
Official Journal L 157 , 21/06/2005 P. 0039 - 0039 *

Article 31

1. For the first year of accession, the Union shall provide temporary financial assistance, hereinafter referred to as the "Transition Facility", to Bulgaria and Romania to develop and strengthen their administrative and judicial capacity to implement and enforce Union law and to foster exchange of best practice among peers. This assistance shall fund institution‐building projects and limited small-scale investments ancillary thereto.

2. Assistance shall address the continued need for strengthening institutional capacity in certain areas through action which cannot be financed by the Structural Funds or by the Rural Development Funds.

3. For twinning projects between public administrations for the purpose of institution building, the procedure for call for proposals through the network of contact points in the Member States shall continue to apply, as established in the Framework Agreements with the Member States for the purpose of pre‐accession assistance.

The commitment appropriations for the Transition Facility, at 2004 prices, for Bulgaria and Romania, shall be EUR 82 million in the first year after accession to address national and horizontal priorities. The appropriations shall be authorised by the budgetary authority within the limits of the financial perspective.

4. Assistance under the Transition Facility shall be decided and implemented in accordance with Council Regulation (EEC) No 3906/89 on economic aid to certain countries of Central and Eastern Europe.

--------------------------------------------------
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 760 

To amend the Department of Agriculture Reorganization Act of 1994 to 

authorize mandatory funding for the Healthy Food Financing Initiative. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 9, 2023 

Mr. CASEY (for himself and Mrs. GILLIBRAND) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 

A BILL 

To amend the Department of Agriculture Reorganization 

Act of 1994 to authorize mandatory funding for the 

Healthy Food Financing Initiative. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Healthy Food Financ5 ing Initiative Reauthorization Act of 2023’’. 

6 SEC. 2. HEALTHY FOOD FINANCING INITIATIVE. 

7 Section 243 of the Department of Agriculture Reor8 ganization Act of 1994 (7 U.S.C. 6953) is amended by 

9 striking subsection (d) and inserting the following: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 760 IS

1 ‘‘(d) FUNDING.—Of the funds of the Commodity 

2 Credit Corporation, the Secretary shall use to carry out 

3 this section— 

4 ‘‘(1) $25,000,000 for fiscal year 2024; 

5 ‘‘(2) $30,000,000 for fiscal year 2025; 

6 ‘‘(3) $35,000,000 for fiscal year 2026; 

7 ‘‘(4) $40,000,000 for fiscal year 2027; and 

8 ‘‘(5) $50,000,000 for fiscal year 2028 and each 

9 fiscal year thereafter.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
§ 330.3 References. ( a ) Section 4 of the Flood Control Act of 1944, as amended (16 U.S.C. 460d).
( b ) Section 234 of the River and Harbor and Flood Control Act of 1970 (Pub. L. 91-611, 84 Stat. 1818).
( c ) Section 120 of the Water Resource Development Act of 1976 (Pub. L. 94-587, 90 Stat. 2917).
( d ) 36 CFR chapter III.
( e ) ER 190-2-3.
( f ) ER 190-3-4.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           6,617
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   28,478
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,003
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                36,494
<PP&E>                                         925,710
<DEPRECIATION>                                 489,203
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 477,719
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           43,859
<BONDS>                                        270,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    135,000
<COMMON>                                           472
<OTHER-SE>                                      28,388
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   477,719
<SALES>                                        132,576
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               133,361
<CGS>                                           78,944
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   78,944
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              22,879
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 16,867
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             16,867
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    16,867
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.25


</TABLE>
Regulatory Evaluation 

Docket No. FAA- Directorate Identifier: -AD 

!fyou make changes to the values in the table below. you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If 

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell. 

Estimated Costs: 

Action Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

(e.g., Inspection, propeller, appliance) 

Work-hours Labor Parts Cost Total Costs Number of Total Cost replacement) (include cost (labor+ u.s. for U.S. Fleet Do not include oncondition costs here 

access, testing, (@$85/h parts) Registered 

and close-up) our) Products 

Access 2.5 54 ' 

Remove tube 

assemblies, 1.0 \ :\·(II .. , . ! q' 54 ' 

I "').I)( 1 

Figures 1 and 2 

Clean drain lines 6.0 \ 10.011 I (I I 54 H .l I 

Install new drain 

lines, and 2.0 I I) II! $ 17,412 ., I .. ii(l 54 I I' 

insulation blankets 

Leak check drain 

0.7 

lines \J "'' ~. ,. •(I 54 I' I 

Close 2.5 " ) 12.:'0 ., ' 1 \ :,, 54 

Incorporate AWL 

54-A WL-0 1 into 0.5 :, 1::.~,, " I' •II 54 \ ' 'IJ.;; ll• I 

MPD ., i) (l( I ., () fill .., n nq 

\ ') ()(I ~ non II (ll} 

' I ()II '• nqn r. 1•11 

II I II • ·:. I' lf) I I (I( 

I ttl' ll )II " ;I! 

' " (I( \1 110 ' 'J'·''' 

\ 0 (l() ., I i'l II I (I 

' (I 1!11 ., ,. II ()If 

·, () {)( I ·,. (\ pq \ ( > (\(1 

0:, 'I on ' .. '1\ 1)1)(1 

·-. f\ I)(, ~ II l il) i)l)tl 

" I) lj( I 't· IIJ!I I J Ill) 

\ 0 (10 ~. n no 11 r 111 

The known number of products in compliance: 

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $1 ,010,016 

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $ 

On-Condition Costs: . , 

Action Work-hours Labor cost Parts Cost Cost per Product 

(e.g., Inspection, (include access, (@$85/hour) 

replacement) testing, and closeup) 
Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs): 

Executive Order 12866: 

Could the AD be considered a "significant regulatory acti "? ~ 

YES* D N0[8) 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: 

Is the AD significant? ~ 

YES* D N0[8) 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act: 

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

e ither a Yes or No answer. -

YES D NO [8) 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: 

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode oftransp011ation? ~ 

YES* D NO [8) 

*Explanation:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JAMES WATTS,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 384 EAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 12th day of December, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
**Docket Number FAA -**  **2015 -**  **0078**
# EUR-Lex - 12008M024 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008M024

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on European Union - TITLE V: GENERAL PROVISIONS ON THE UNION'S EXTERNAL ACTION AND SPECIFIC PROVISIONS ON THE COMMON FOREIGN AND SECURITY POLICY - Chapter 2: Specific provisions on the common foreign and security policy - Section 1: Common provisions - Article 24 (ex Article 11 TEU) **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0030 - 0031 *

Article 24

(ex Article 11 TEU)

1. The Union's competence in matters of common foreign and security policy shall cover all areas of foreign policy and all questions relating to the Union's security, including the progressive framing of a common defence policy that might lead to a common defence.

The common foreign and security policy is subject to specific rules and procedures. It shall be defined and implemented by the European Council and the Council acting unanimously, except where the Treaties provide otherwise. The adoption of legislative acts shall be excluded. The common foreign and security policy shall be put into effect by the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy and by Member States, in accordance with the Treaties. The specific role of the European Parliament and of the Commission in this area is defined by the Treaties. The Court of Justice of the European Union shall not have jurisdiction with respect to these provisions, with the exception of its jurisdiction to monitor compliance with Article 40 of this Treaty and to review the legality of certain decisions as provided for by the second paragraph of Article 275 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

2. Within the framework of the principles and objectives of its external action, the Union shall conduct, define and implement a common foreign and security policy, based on the development of mutual political solidarity among Member States, the identification of questions of general interest and the achievement of an ever-increasing degree of convergence of Member States' actions.

3. The Member States shall support the Union's external and security policy actively and unreservedly in a spirit of loyalty and mutual solidarity and shall comply with the Union's action in this area.

The Member States shall work together to enhance and develop their mutual political solidarity. They shall refrain from any action which is contrary to the interests of the Union or likely to impair its effectiveness as a cohesive force in international relations.

The Council and the High Representative shall ensure compliance with these principles.

--------------------------------------------------
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Harry S. Truman Scholarship Foundation

November 16, 2006, 3 p.m.-5 p.m. Rayburn House Office Building, Room 2216.

I. Welcome and Opening Comments. 

II. Approval of the Minutes of the Meeting of November 8, 2005. 

III. Report from the President. 

IV. Report from the Executive Secretary. 

                    V. Report on 2006 Summer Institute, 2006/2007 Truman Fellows Program.                           ( print page 58865)    

VI. Approval of Budget for FY 2007. 

VII. Old Business. 

VIII. New Business. 

IX. Adjournment. 

Frederick G. Slabach, 

Executive Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 06-8526 Filed 10-3-06; 9:49 am] 

BILLING CODE 6820-AD-P
#### § 64.3 Applicability and authority.

The policies and procedures contained herein are applicable to the making of grants to State and local governments and to the making of allocations to Federal agencies under the provisions of title VIII, section 809(b) (2) and (3) of the Railroad Revitalization and Regulatory Reform Act of 1976 (Pub. L. 94-210) (90 Stat. 145). The Secretary of the Interior in consultation with the Secretary of Transportation is responsible for providing financial assistance in accordance with section 809(b) (2) and (3). The Secretary of the Interior's responsibility has been delegated to the Bureau of Outdoor Recreation.
# EUR-Lex - 12004V354 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V354

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART III — THE POLICIES AND FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - TITLE VI — THE FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - CHAPTER I — PROVISIONS GOVERNING THE INSTITUTIONS - Section 1 — The institutions - Subsection 5 — The Court of Justice of the European Union - Article III-354 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0156 - 0156 *

Article III-354

The Court of Justice shall be assisted by eight Advocates-General. Should the Court of Justice so request, the Council may, acting unanimously, adopt a European decision to increase the number of Advocates-General.

It shall be the duty of the Advocate-General, acting with complete impartiality and independence, to make, in open court, reasoned submissions on cases which, in accordance with the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union, require his or her involvement.

--------------------------------------------------
[Cite as State v. Russell , 2012-Ohio-2336.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY STATE OF OHIO : : Appellate Case No. 24802 Plaintiff-Appellee : : Trial Court Ca se No. 2011-CR-1758 v. : : (Criminal Appeal from RANDALL L. RUSSELL : ( Common Pleas Court) : Defendant-Appellant : :

. . . . . . . . . . . O P I N I O N Rendered on the 25 th day of May, 2012.

. . . . . . . . . . . MATHIAS H. HECK, JR., by ANDREW T. FRENCH, Atty. Reg. #0069384, Montgomery County Prosecutor’s Office, Appe llate Division, Montgomery County Courts Building, P.O. Box 972, 301 West Third Street, Dayton, Ohio 45422 Attorney for Plaintiff-Appellee LUCAS W. WILDER, Atty. Reg. #0074057, 120 West Second Street, Suite 400, Dayton, Ohio 45402 Attorney for Defendant-Appellant

. . . . . . . . . . . . . HALL, J. {¶ 1} Randall Lee Russell appeals from his conviction and sentence following a guilty plea to a charge of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol 2

 (OVI). {¶ 2} In his sole assignment of error, Ru ssell contends the trial court abused its discretion in imposing a mandatory fine as pa rt of his third-degree felony OVI sentence. Because he filed a pre-sentence affidavit of indigency and the trial court found him indigent, Russell claims the tria l court should not have imposed a $1,350 fine. {¶ 3} In support of his argument, Russe ll relies on R.C. 2929.18(B)(1), which provides in part: “If an offender a lleges in an affidavit filed with the court prior to sentencing that the offender is indigent and unable to pay the mandatory fine and if the court determines the offender is an indigent person and is unable to pay the mandatory fine described in this division, the court shall not impose th e mandatory fine upon the offender.” {¶ 4} Upon review, we find Russell’s argume nt to be without merit. Another provision, R.C. 2929.18(B)(3), states that “[f]or a fourth degree felony OVI offense and for a third degree felony OVI offense, the sent encing court shall impose upon the offender a mandatory fine in the amount specified in di vision (G)(1)(d) or (e) of section 4511.19 of the Revised Code, whichever is a pplicable.” In turn, R.C. 4511.19( G)(1)(e)(iii) makes clear that the fine required by R.C. 2929.18(B)(3) for a third-degree felony OVI offense cannot be waived. It states that a pers on convicted of third-degree fel ony OVI shall receive a sentence that includes “[i]n all cases, notwithstanding Section 2929.18 of the Revised Code , a fine of not less than one thousand three hundred fi fty * * * dollars.” (Emphasis added.) See State v. Whalen , 2d Dist. Montgomery No. 19783, 2003-Ohio-6539 ( holding that a fine is required for a fourth-degree felony OVI offense ev en when an offender is indigent). {¶ 5} On the authority of R.C. 4511.19(G)(1)(e )(iii), and this court’s decision in 3

 Whalen , we overrule Russell’s assi gnment of error and affirm the judgment of the Montgomery County Common Pleas Court.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . GRADY, P.J., and DONOVAN, J., concur.

Copies mailed to: Mathias H. Heck Andrew T. French Lucas W. Wilder Hon. Michael Tucker
Exhibit
32.1





MIT
Holding, Inc.


Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350


Section
906 Certifications





Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. §
1350, as enacted by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Public Law 107-204), the undersigned, William C.
Parker, the Chief Executive Officer of MIT Holding, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), and John A. Sabia, the Controller (the Principal
Financial Officer) of the Company, hereby certify that:





1.   The
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, as
filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.   The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





This
Certification is signed on April 15, 2010.





/s/
      William C. ParkerWilliam
      C. ParkerChief
      Executive OfficerMIT
      Holding, Inc./s/
      John A. SabiaJohn
      A. SabiaController
      (the Principal Financial Officer)MIT
      Holding, Inc.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to MIT Holding, Inc. and will be retained by MIT Holding, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
§ 261.8 Fish and wildlife. The following are prohibited to the extent Federal or State law is violated: ( a ) Hunting, trapping, fishing, catching, molesting, killing or having in possession any kind of wild animal, bird, or fish, or taking the eggs of any such bird.
( b ) Possessing a firearm or other implement designed to discharge a missile capable of destroying animal life.
( c ) Possessing equipment which could be used for hunting, fishing, or trapping.
( d ) Possessing a dog not on a leash or otherwise confined.
( e ) Curtail the free movement of any animal or plant life into or out of a cave, except as authorized to protect a cave resource.
[42 FR 2957, Jan. 14, 1977, as amended at 46 FR 33520, June 30, 1981; 59 FR 31152, June 17, 1994]
Exhibit (10)(a)

    

    

    

    

    

    

    Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

    

    

    

    

    We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in
      Post-Effective Amendment No. 79 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-40937) and Amendment No. 781 to the 1940 Act Registration
      Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-08517), and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) March 13, 2020, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company and (b) April 15, 2020, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln National Variable Annuity
      Account N for the registration of interests in a separate account under individual flexible payment deferred variable annuity contracts.

    

    

    

    

    

    

    

    

    /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

    August 14, 2020
## FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT 08/06/99 THOMAS K. KAHN CLERK IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________________ No. 97-4845

________________________________ D.C. Docket No. 94-0147-cv Bktcy. No. 93-0361 IN RE: LEROY CHARLES GRIFFITH, Debtor. LEROY CHARLES GRIFFITH, Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida

_________________________________________________________________ (Opinion May 11 , 1999, ___ F.3d ____, 11th Cir., 1999) (August 6, 1999) Before ANDERSON, Chief Judge, TJOFLA T, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES, BARKETT, HULL and MARCUS, Circuit Judges. B Y T H E C O U R T : A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion of rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.eb4845or