alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition at March 31, 2000 (Unaudited) and
the Consolidated Statement of Income for the nine months ended March 31, 2000
(Unaudited) and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           5,405
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,155
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   6,155
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,343
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       799,366
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     6,155
<SALES>                                            373
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              (29,178)
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   55,990
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,915
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                373
<DISCONTINUED>                                (29,551)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               (29,551)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (26,066)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.00)


</TABLE>
#### § 9.63 How long will I have to conduct my reconnaissance surveys?

The duration of your temporary access permit will be stated in the permit, based upon the scope of the reconnaissance surveys needed. The Regional Director may, upon written request, extend the term of the temporary access permit.
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

____________

No. 12-5335 September Term, 2012

1:11-cv-02189-EGS

Filed On: March 11, 2013

Abdul Karim Hassan,

Appellant

v.

Federal Election Commission,

Appellee

BEFORE: Henderson, Griffith, and Kavanaugh, Circuit Judges

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the motion to expedite and the opposition thereto; the

motion for summary affirmance, the opposition thereto, and the reply; and the motion

for summary reversal, the opposition thereto, and the reply, it is

ORDERED that the motion for summary affirmance be granted and the motion

for summary reversal be denied. The merits of the parties' positions are so clear as to

warrant summary action. See Taxpayers Watchdog, Inc. v. Stanley, 819 F.2d 294, 297

(D.C. Cir. 1987) (per curiam). The district court correctly determined that appellant

lacks standing to challenge the constitutionality of the Presidential Election Campaign

Fund Act, 26 U.S.C. §§ 9001 et seq., (“Fund Act”), to the extent it renders naturalized

citizens ineligible for campaign funding. See Arizona Christian School Tuition Org. v.

Winn, 131 S. Ct. 1436, 1442 (2011) (and cases cited therein) (to establish standing

plaintiff must show injury-in-fact, causal connection between injury and challenged

conduct, and likelihood that a favorable decision will redress injury). Because appellant

lacked standing to bring a Fund Act claim, the district court properly declined to

convene a three-judge court. Wertheimer v. FEC, 268 F.3d 1070, (D.C. Cir. 2001). To

the extent appellant maintains that Article II, Section I, clause 5 of the United States

Constitution has been implicitly repealed to the extent it bars naturalized citizens such

as himself from holding the office of President, appellant failed to state a claim for relief. 

Appellant cites no authority to support his contention that a constitutional provision can

be implicitly repealed, nor has he shown the natural-born citizen requirement is in

irreconcilable conflict with the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments, or that those

USCA Case #12-5335 Document #1424544 Filed: 03/11/2013 Page 1 of 2
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

____________

No. 12-5335 September Term, 2012

amendments “cover[ ] the whole subject” of the requirement and are “clearly intended

as a substitute.” Branch v. Smith, 538 U.S. 254, 273 (2003). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the motion to expedite be dismissed as moot.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk

is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution

of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App.

P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.

Per Curiam 

Page 2

USCA Case #12-5335 Document #1424544 Filed: 03/11/2013 Page 2 of 2
---

CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 
  PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, K. Ian Matheson, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
  Financial Officer of Phage Genomics, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby
  certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
  of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company,
        for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2005, and to which this certification
        is attached as Exhibit 32 (the “Report”) fully complies with
        the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
        Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
        in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
        of the Company.                                                                                                                                                            

| | By:    | /s/
      K. Ian Matheson        
| | ------ | ---------------------------------
| |        |                                  
| | Name:  | K. IAN MATHESON                  
| |        |                                  
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer and Chief
| |        | Financial Officer                
| |        |                                  
| | Date:  | May 23, 2005                     

A signed original of this written statement required by
  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company
  and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
  Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-QSB to which
  it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
  and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under
  the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
  before or after the date of the Form 10-QSB), irrespective of any general incorporation
  language contained in such filing.

---
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED August 22, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-20764 Summary Calendar

FRED PHILLIP WARNER, Petitioner-Appellant,
versus NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, Respondent-Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

No. 4:03-CV-1932

-------------------- Before SMITH, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Fred Warner challenges his conviction of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon. He contends that counsel’s failure to object to three convictions listed in enhancement paragraphs resulted in his being sentenced to 35 years of imprisonment as an habitualNo. 04-20764 -2- offender pursuant to T EX. P ENAL CODE A NN. § 1 2.42(d) (Vernon 2003), within a range of life or 25-99 years of imprisonment, instead of
as a first degree felon pursuant to T EX. P ENAL CODE A NN. § 12.42(b) (Vernon 2003), within a range of life or 5-99 years. Warner has not rebutted the correctness of the finding of the Texas Court of Appeals that he was sentenced pursuant to § 12.42(b) by clear and convincing evidence. S ee 28 U.S.C. § 2254(e)(1). He thus cannot demonstrate prejudice arising from counsel’s failure to object to the enhancement paragraphs. See Strickland v. Washington , 466 U.S. 668, 694 (1984). Warner also states that, because the state failed to present evidence regarding his prior convictions, his sentence should have been 2-20 years. He does not contend, however, that counsel was ineffective for advising him to plead “true,” so he has failed to raise a meritorious ineffective-assistance contention. S ee Long v. McCotter , 792 F.2d 1338, 1342 (5th Cir. 1986) (stating that a “true” plea “waive[d] subsequent challenges to the validity of the prior conviction[s] set forth in the charge”). AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 612 Referred in House (RFH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                 S. 612

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 9, 2024

 Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the 
Committees on Transportation and Infrastructure, and Agriculture, for a 
 period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 
consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 
                          committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To reauthorize the Lake Tahoe Restoration Act, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Lake Tahoe Restoration 
Reauthorization Act''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF THE LAKE TAHOE RESTORATION ACT.

    (a) Cooperative Authorities.--Section 4(f) of the Lake Tahoe 
Restoration Act (Public Law 106-506) is amended by striking ``4 fiscal 
years following the date of enactment of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 2016'' and inserting ``period beginning on the date 
of enactment of this subsection and ending on the date described in 
section 10(a)''.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--Section 10(a) of the Lake 
Tahoe Restoration Act (Public Law 106-506) is amended by striking ``for 
a period'' and all that follows through the period at the end and 
inserting ``, to remain available until September 30, 2034.''.

            Passed the Senate July 10, 2024.

            Attest:

                                            SONCERIA ANN BERRY,

                                                             Secretary.
```
vrm-ex103_232.htm



 

Exhibit 10.3

FIRST AMENDMENT 

TO THE

SECOND AMENDED & RESTATED VROOM, INC. 2014 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN

 

This First Amendment (the “Amendment”) to the Second Amended and Restated  Vroom, Inc. 2014 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) is effective as of September 20, 2016.

 

Whereas, Section 13 of the Plan provides that the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Vroom, Inc. (the “Company”) may amend the Plan; 

Whereas, the Board has approved the increase of the number of shares of common stock of the Company (“Common Stock”) reserved for issuance under the Plan by 1,500,000 shares, so that an aggregate of 6,231,730 shares of Common Stock are reserved for issuance under the Plan; and

 

Whereas, the Board has approved the amendments to the Plan set forth herein. 

 

Now, Therefore, 

1.  Section 4(a) of the Plan is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows: 

“(a) Share Reserve.  Subject to the provisions of Section 12 relating to adjustments upon changes in Common Stock, the number of shares of Common Stock that may be issued pursuant Stock Awards shall not exceed in the aggregate 6,231,730 shares of Common Stock. The maximum number of shares of Common Stock that may be issued pursuant to Options intended to be Incentive Stock Options is 6,231,730.”

2.   Section 4(b) of the Plan is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:

“(b) Reversion of Shares to the Share Reserve.  Unless otherwise specifically provided in the applicable Stock Award Agreement delivered to a Participant, if and to the extent that any Stock Award or portion of a Stock Award is forfeited, is repurchased by the Company for no more than the Participant’s original cost, terminates, expires or is canceled, the forfeited, repurchased, terminated or cancelled shares of Common Stock subject to such Stock Award shall again be available for distribution in connection with Stock Awards under the Plan. Subject to the preceding sentence, shares of Common Stock shall be deemed to have been issued pursuant to the Plan with respect to any portion of a Stock Award that is settled or paid in cash. If payment for the exercise of a Stock Award is made by transfer to the Company of shares of Common Stock owned by a Participant, only the number of shares issued net of the shares delivered shall be deemed delivered for purposes of determining the maximum number of shares of Common Stock and/or Incentive Stock Options available for delivery under the Plan. To the extent any shares of Common Stock subject to a Stock Award are not delivered to a Participant because such shares are used to satisfy an applicable tax withholding obligation, such shares shall not be 

 



 

deemed to have been delivered for purposes of determining the maximum number of shares of Common Stock available for delivery under the Plan.  

3.   Except as otherwise specially provided herein, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.
#### § 1005.4 Commercial passenger-carrying motor vehicles.

Passenger-carrying motor vehicles that are so large as to require special escort in order to proceed safely over Presidio Trust roads, or which in the judgment of the Executive Director are beyond the carrying capacity or safety factor of the roads, will not be permitted in the area administered by the Presidio Trust, except that, where they may satisfactorily enter and travel to the Presidio Trust headquarters they may be parked there during the period of stay.
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20463

STATEMENT OF REASONS OF COMMISSIONER ELLEN L. WEINTRAUB

In this matter, the Kansas Democratic Party, a state committee of the Democratic Party,

violated the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 (the “Act”), as amended, and Commission 

regulations by misreporting nearly three million dollars in activity. Specifically, the Committee 

inaccurately reported debts, inaccurately reported its cash on hand, understated receipts and 

disbursements, and failed to itemize contributor information for contributions received from joint 

fundraisers.

1 I have written before about my concerns about the 2016 joint fundraising committees.2

Unsurprisingly, a number of the participating state party committees made significant reporting 

errors.3

I did not approve the conciliation agreement in this case because these violations merited a 

higher penalty. The negotiated agreement requires the Kansas Democratic Party to pay a civil 

penalty of $60,000 for the violations listed above, which totaled $2,964,990.4 Civil penalties are 

based on the type of and amount in violation.5 Even taking into account the compliance measures 

undertaken by the committee, the penalty in this matter deviates from and is well below what the 

Commission would normally seek or accept. 

As a result, I could not support the pre-probable cause conciliation agreement with such a 

disproportionately low penalty.6 Fair, proportionate, and consistent penalties are a key part of an 

enforcement program that supports the Commission’s important public disclosure mission and 

promotes voluntary compliance with the law. Inconsistent low-ball penalties such as the one at issue 

 

1 See generally KDP Agreement ¶ IV; 52 U.S.C. § 30104(b)(3)(A); 52 U.S.C. § 30104(b)(8); 11 C.F.R. §§ 104.3(d), 

104.11(a); 52 U.S.C. § 30104(b)(1); 11 C.F.R. §§ 104.3(a)(1), 104.12.

2 Statement of Reasons of Comm’r Ellen L. Weintraub, MURs 7304 & 7331 (Hillary Victory Fund, et. al.), MUR 7339 

(Trump Victory, et. al.), https://eqs.fec.gov/eqsdocsMUR/7304_1.pdf. 3 See, e.g., Settlement Agreement in ADR 912 (North Dakota Republican Party), dated July 1, 2020; Settlement 

Agreement in ADR 913 (Mississippi Democratic Party), dated Sept. 6, 2019. 4 KDP Agreement ¶ IV, VI. 5 See 52 U.S.C. § 30109(a)(5)-(6). 6 See Certification in MURs 7556 & 7601, dated January 26, 2021. Vice Chair Dickerson and Commissioners Cooksey, 

Trainor, and Walther approved the pre-probable cause conciliation agreement. Chair Broussard and I dissented.

BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

In the Matter of

Kansas Democratic Party

)

 ) 

 ) 

 ) 

 ) 

 ) 

 

 MURs 7556 and 7601 

 

 

MUR755600066
MURs 7556 and 7601 (Kansas Democratic Party)

Statement of Commissioner Ellen L. Weintraub 

Page 2 of 2 

here undermine the Commission’s mission and amount to little more than the cost of doing 

business. 

 March 19, 2021 __________________________ 

Date Ellen L. Weintraub 

 Commissioner 

MUR755600067
# EUR-Lex - 12006E140 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12006E140

**Treaty establishing the European Community (consolidated version) - Part Three - Community policies - TITLE XI - Social policy, education, vocational training and youth - Chapter 1 - Social provisions - Article 140 **

*
Official Journal C 321 E , 29/12/2006 P. 0109 - 0110 Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0095 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0241 - Consolidated version *

Article 140

With a view to achieving the objectives of Article 136 and without prejudice to the other provisions of this Treaty, the Commission shall encourage cooperation between the Member States and facilitate the coordination of their action in all social policy fields under this Chapter, particularly in matters relating to:

- employment,

- labour law and working conditions,

- basic and advanced vocational training,

- social security,

- prevention of occupational accidents and diseases,

- occupational hygiene,

- the right of association and collective bargaining between employers and workers.

To this end, the Commission shall act in close contact with Member States by making studies, delivering opinions and arranging consultations both on problems arising at national level and on those of concern to international organisations.

Before delivering the opinions provided for in this Article, the Commission shall consult the Economic and Social Committee.

--------------------------------------------------
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 203 (Friday, October 20, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 61981]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-8797]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and 
Alcoholism Special Emphasis Panel.
    Date: October 24, 2006.
    Time: 12 p.m. to 2:45 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, 
Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Contact Person: Katrina L. Foster, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, National Inst on Alcohol Abuse & Alcoholism, National 
Institutes of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, Rm. 3042, Rockville, MD 
20852, 301-443-4032, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#90fbf1e4e2f9fef1d0fdf1f9fcbefef9f8bef7ffe6"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="81eae0f5f3e8efe0c1ece0e8edafefe8e9afe6eef7">[email protected]</span></a>.

    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.271, 
Alcohol Research Career Development Awards for Scientists and 
Clinicians; 93.272, Alcohol National Research Service Awards for 
Research Training; 93.273, Alcohol Research Programs; 93.891, 
Alcohol Research Center Grants, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: October 13, 2006.
Linda Payne,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 06-8797 Filed 10-19-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
§ 9.170 When must I plug my well? Except as provided in § 9.171, you must plug your well when any of the following occurs: ( a ) Your drilling operations have ended and you have taken no further action to produce the well within 60 days;
( b ) Your well, which has been completed for production operations, has no measureable production quantities for 12 consecutive months; or
( c ) The period approved in your operations permit to maintain your well in shut-in status has expired.