alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 189 (Friday, September 29, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 57485]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-8362]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Defense Science Board

AGENCY: Department of Defense.

ACTION: Notice of Advisory Committee Meetings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Science Board Task Force on Energy Strategy will 
meet in closed session on October 6, 2006; November 29, 2006; and 
December 14, 2006; at Science Applications International Corporation 
(SAIC); 8301 Greensboro Drive, McLean, VA. This meeting will 
specifically identify strategic transition-opportunities inherently 
offered by technologies that have implications for energy and their 
systemic second- and third-order effects. The briefings will contain 
proprietary material from the private business sector.
    The mission of the Defense Science Board is to advise the Secretary 
of Defense and the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, 
Technology & Logistics on scientific and technical matters as they 
affect the perceived needs of the Department of Defense. At these 
meetings, the Defense Science Board Task Force will: identify DoD 
operational and strategic constraints and vulnerabilities created by 
optimizing tactical platforms and capabilities without regard to energy 
usage; programs and means for the DoD to reduce its energy demand, 
particularly on petroleum-based fuels; and examine implications of 
alternative.
    In accordance with Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act, P.L. No. 92-463, as amended (5 U.S.C. App. II), it has been 
determined that these Defense Science Board Task Force meetings concern 
matters listed in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(4) and that, accordingly, the 
meetings will be closed to the public.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Major Chad Lominac, USAF, Defense 
Science Board, 3140 Defense Pentagon, Room 3C553, Washington, DC 20301-
3140, via e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#294a41485b454c5a074546444047484a69465a4d07444045"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e4878c8596888197ca888b898d8a8587a48b9780ca898d88">[email protected]</span></a>, or via phone at (703) 571-
0081.

    Dated: September 25, 2006.
C.R. Choate,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 06-8362 Filed 9-28-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

          - [Transmittal No. 06-57]

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 July 1996.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. J. Hurd, DSCA/DBO/ADM, (703) 604-6575.

The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Transmittal 06-57 with attached transmittal, policy justification, and Sensitivity of Technology.

Dated: September 20, 2006.

C.R. Choate,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

      ( print page 56484)          ( print page 56485)          ( print page 56486)          ( print page 56487)          ( print page 56488)          ( print page 56489)    

BILLING CODE 5001-06-M

[FR Doc. 06-8291 Filed 9-26-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
§ 2.2 Wildlife protection. ( a ) The following are prohibited: ( 1 ) The taking of wildlife, except by authorized hunting and trapping activities conducted in accordance with paragraph (b) of this section.
( 2 ) The feeding, touching, teasing, frightening or intentional disturbing of wildlife nesting, breeding or other activities.
( 3 ) Possessing unlawfully taken wildlife or portions thereof.
( b ) *Hunting and trapping.* ( 1 ) Hunting shall be allowed in park areas where such activity is specifically mandated by Federal statutory law.
( 2 ) Hunting may be allowed in park areas where such activity is specifically authorized as a discretionary activity under Federal statutory law if the superintendent determines that such activity is consistent with public safety and enjoyment, and sound resource management principles. Such hunting shall be allowed pursuant to special regulations.
( 3 ) Trapping shall be allowed in park areas where such activity is specifically mandated by Federal statutory law.
( 4 ) Where hunting or trapping or both are authorized, such activities shall be conducted in accordance with Federal law and the laws of the State within whose exterior boundaries a park area or a portion thereof is located. Nonconflicting State laws are adopted as a part of these regulations.
( c ) Except in emergencies or in areas under the exclusive jurisdiction of the United States, the superintendent shall consult with appropriate State agencies before invoking the authority of § 1.5 for the purpose of restricting hunting and trapping or closing park areas to the taking of wildlife where such activities are mandated or authorized by Federal statutory law.
( d ) The superintendent may establish conditions and procedures for transporting lawfully taken wildlife through the park area. Violation of these conditions and procedures is prohibited.
( e ) The Superintendent may designate all or portions of a park area as closed to the viewing of wildlife with an artificial light. Use of an artificial light for purposes of viewing wildlife in closed areas is prohibited.
( f ) Authorized persons may check hunting and trapping licenses and permits; inspect weapons, traps and hunting and trapping gear for compliance with equipment restrictions; and inspect wildlife that has been taken for compliance with species, size and other taking restrictions.
( g ) The regulations contained in this section apply, regardless of land ownership, on all lands and waters within a park area that are under the legislative jurisdiction of the United States.
[48 FR 30282, June 30, 1983, as amended at 49 FR 18450, Apr. 30, 1984; 51 FR 33264, Sept. 19, 1986; 52 FR 35240, Sept. 18, 1987]
#### § 17.7 Preference rights.

On any property which has been in Federal ownership less than two years, the Secretary, in addition to the notice specified in § 17.4, shall inform the last owner or owners of record by certified mail at their present or last known address of the highest bid on the interest and advise them of their right to acquire the interest for an amount equal to the highest bid if within 30 days they notify the Secretary of their desire to do so and make payment or agree to make payment of an amount equal to that specified in § 17.5.

If within 30 days of mailing of such notification, the former owner or owners do not indicate a desire to acquire the interest and make payment or agree to make payment for such interest in an amount equal to the declared high bid, or, if they do indicate such a desire but fail to consummate the transaction within the time period established for the conveyance, then the bid of the declared high bidder will be accepted. In the event that a former owner who indicates a desire to repurchase pursuant to this procedure fails to consummate the transaction within the established time period the declared high bidder shall be permitted, but not required, to consummate the transaction. If the declared high bidder does not choose to consummate the transaction in this circumstance, the entire transaction will be cancelled, and, if appropriate, a new bidding procedure instituted.
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

FEBRUARY 23, 2010

JOHN LEY

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 09-13273

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 96-00060-CR-004-CAR-5

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOHNNY GOODMAN,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Georgia

_________________________

(February 23, 2010)

Before TJOFLAT, EDMONDSON and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Demetria Nicole Williams, appointed counsel for Johnny Goodman in his
appeal of the district court’s denial of his motion to reduce his sentence pursuant to

18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S.

738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and moved to withdraw from further

representation of the appellant. Our independent review of the entire record

reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct.

Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of

merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the denial of Goodman’s

§ 3582(c)(2) motion to reduce his sentence is AFFIRMED.

SO ORDERED.

2
#### § 13.124 Emergency use.

During an emergency involving the safety of human life, a person may use any cabin designated by the Superintendent for official government business, general public use or shared subsistence use. The person shall report such use to the Superintendent as soon as is practicable.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report of Wells Real Estate Fund IV, L.P. (the Registrant) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the
undersigned, Leo F. Wells, III, Chief Executive Officer of the corporate general partner of one of the General Partners of the Registrant, and Douglas P. Williams, Chief Financial Officer of the corporate general partner of one of the General
Partners of the Registrant, hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that, to the best of our knowledge and belief:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                          
|--------------------------
|                          
|/S/    LEO F. WELLS,
III  
|Leo F. Wells, III         
|Chief Executive Officer   
|March 28, 2006            
|                          
|/S/    DOUGLAS P.
WILLIAMS
|Douglas P. Williams       
|Chief Financial Officer   
|March 28, 2006
# EUR-Lex - 12004VN02 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004VN02

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - Protocols and Annexes - Annex II — Overseas countries and territories to which Title IV of Part III of the Constitution applies **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0400 - 0400 *

ANNEX II

OVERSEAS COUNTRIES AND TERRITORIES TO WHICH TITLE IV OF PART III OF THE CONSTITUTION APPLIES

- Greenland

- New Caledonia and Dependencies

- French Polynesia

- French Southern and Antarctic Territories

- Wallis and Futuna Islands

- Mayotte

- Saint Pierre and Miquelon

- Aruba

- - Bonaire

- Curaçao

- Saba

- Sint Eustatius

- Sint Maarten

- Anguilla

- Cayman Islands

- Falkland Islands

- South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands

- Montserrat

- Pitcairn

- Saint Helena and Dependencies

- British Antarctic Territory

- British Indian Ocean Territory

- Turks and Caicos Islands

- British Virgin Islands

- Bermuda

--------------------------------------------------
#### § 222.66 Removal of wild free-roaming horses and burros from private lands.

Owners of land upon which wild free-roaming horses and burros have strayed from the National Forest System may request their removal by calling the nearest office of either the Forest Service or Federal Marshall.
#### § 219.3 Role of science in planning.

The responsible official shall use the best available scientific information to inform the planning process required by this subpart for assessment; developing, amending, or revising a plan; and monitoring. In doing so, the responsible official shall determine what information is the most accurate, reliable, and relevant to the issues being considered. The responsible official shall document how the best available scientific information was used to inform the assessment, the plan or amendment decision, and the monitoring program as required in §§ 219.6(a)(3) and 219.14(a)(3). Such documentation must: Identify what information was determined to be the best available scientific information, explain the basis for that determination, and explain how the information was applied to the issues considered.

[81 FR 90737, Dec. 15, 2016]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-5071

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

GEBRIAN RAYSHAWN GILLESPIE, a/k/a Gebrian Rayshawn Millspin, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle 

District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. 

Osteen, Jr., District Judge. (1:08-cr-00023-WO-1) 

Submitted: June 10, 2009 Decided: July 2, 2009 

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Louis C. Allen, III, Federal Public Defender, Gregory Davis, 

Senior Litigator, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, Thomas N. 

Cochran, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Greensboro, North 

Carolina, for Appellant. Anna Mills Wagoner, United States 

Attorney, L. Patrick Auld, Assistant United States Attorney, 

Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
PER CURIAM: 

 Gebrian Rayshawn Gillespie appeals from his conviction 

on a guilty plea and sentence imposed for distribution of crack 

cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A) 

(2006). His sole issue on appeal is that the crack to powder 

cocaine ratio is unconstitutional, a claim he raises for the 

first time on appeal.*

 We find Gillespie’s challenge to the constitutionality 

of § 841 to be without merit. As Gillespie acknowledges on 

appeal, this court has repeatedly rejected claims that the 

sentencing disparity between powder cocaine and crack offenses 

violates either equal protection or due process. See United 

States v. Perkins, 108 F.3d 512, 518 (4th Cir. 1997); United 

States v. Burgos, 94 F.3d 849, 876-77 (4th Cir. 1996); United 

States v. Fisher, 58 F.3d 96, 99-100 (4th Cir. 1995). To the 

extent Gillespie seeks to have us reconsider these decisions, a 

panel of this court cannot overrule the decision of a prior 

panel. United States v. Simms, 441 F.3d 313, 318 (4th Cir. 

2006). 

 Nor do the 2007 amendments to the Sentencing 

Guidelines have any effect on the constitutionality or 

 *

 We review Gillespie’s claim for plain error because he 

failed to raise it in the district court. See Fed. R. Crim. P. 

52(b); United States v. Olano, 507 U.S. 725 (1993). 

2 
3 

applicability of the statutory mandatory minimum sentences for 

crack offenses. Gillespie’s attempts to bolster his argument 

with the Supreme Court’s decision in Kimbrough v. United States, 

128 S. Ct. 558, 575 (2007), is misplaced because its holding 

that district courts may consider the crack/cocaine sentencing 

ratio as a possible basis for variance from the Guidelines is 

unrelated to the constitutionality of the sentencing disparity, 

and the Supreme Court in Kimbrough specifically held that 

“sentencing courts remain bound by the mandatory minimum 

sentences prescribed by statute.” Id. at 573. 

 Accordingly, we affirm Gillespie’s conviction and 

sentence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process. 

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 181 (Tuesday, September 19, 2006)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 54794]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-7771]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service

50 CFR Parts 21 and 22


Migratory Bird Permits; Draft Environmental Assessment on Take of 
Raptors From the Wild for Falconry and Raptor Propagation; Extension of 
Public Comment Period

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of availability; extension of comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (the Service), are 
extending the comment for the draft Environmental Assessment (DEA) on 
take of raptors from the wild for falconry and for captive propagation. 
Comments on the DEA previously submitted need not be resubmitted, 
because they have been incorporated into the public record and will be 
fully considered in the revisions of the DEA.

DATES: The public comment period is extended to November 21, 2006. Any 
comments received after the closing date may not be considered in the 
final guidelines.

ADDRESSES: You may pick up a copy of the DEA at, or hand-deliver your 
comments to the Division of Migratory Bird Management, U.S. Fish and 
Wildlife Service, 4401 North Fairfax Drive, Mail Stop 4107, Arlington, 
Virginia 22203-1610. The DEA also is available on the Division of 
Migratory Bird Management Web site at http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. George T. Allen, Division of 
Migratory Bird Management, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, at 703-358-
1714.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: We published a Notice of Availability of the 
DEA on June 21, 2006, with a 90-day comment period, set to end on 
September 19, 2006 (71 FR 35599). We received a request for a 60-day 
extension of the comment period from the Central Flyway Council (CFC), 
and are now extending the comment period as requested, to allow the CFC 
additional time to review the DEA.

Kenneth Stansell,
Acting Director, Fish and Wildlife Service.
[FR Doc. 06-7771 Filed 9-18-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
Exhibit 32

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS

The undersigned hereby certify that the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Insight Communications Company, Inc. (the "Registrant") for the
quarter ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.

| | /S/  MICHAEL S. WILLNERMichael S. Willner Vice Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | November 14, 2007                                                                  
| | /s/JOHN ABBOTJohn Abbot Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer       
| | November 14, 2007                                                                  

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. Section 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of **Phage Genomics, Inc.** (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended **September 30, 2004** as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, **Caisey Harlingten**, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)     The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 6th day of November, 2004.

 
/s/ Caisey Harlingten 
Caisey Harlingten 
Chief Executive Officer
# EUR-Lex - 12008E144 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008E144

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - PART THREE: UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS - TITLE VIII: ECONOMIC AND MONETARY POLICY - Chapter 5: Transitional provisions - Article 144 (ex Article 120 TEC) **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0111 - 0111 *

Article 144

(ex Article 120 TEC)

1. Where a sudden crisis in the balance of payments occurs and a decision within the meaning of Article 143(2) is not immediately taken, a Member State with a derogation may, as a precaution, take the necessary protective measures. Such measures must cause the least possible disturbance in the functioning of the internal market and must not be wider in scope than is strictly necessary to remedy the sudden difficulties which have arisen.

2. The Commission and the other Member States shall be informed of such protective measures not later than when they enter into force. The Commission may recommend to the Council the granting of mutual assistance under Article 143.

3. After the Commission has delivered a recommendation and the Economic and Financial Committee has been consulted, the Council may decide that the Member State concerned shall amend, suspend or abolish the protective measures referred to above.

--------------------------------------------------
EXHIBIT 32.2




CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ace Marketing & Promotions, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Sean McDonnell, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/S/ SEAN MCDONNELLSEAN MCDONNELLCHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERMay 14, 2010