alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 223.51 Bid monitoring.

Each Regional Forester shall monitor bidding patterns on timber sales to determine if speculative bidding is occurring or if Purchasers are bidding in such a way that they would be unable to perform their obligations under the timber sale contract. A Regional Forester shall propose to the Chief changes in service wide timber sale procedures, as they appear necessary, to discourage speculative bidding.

[50 FR 41500, Oct. 11, 1985]
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A17A1601. EARLY ARNOLD CONNELLY v. THE STATE.

A jury found Early Arnold Connelly guilty of four counts of rape; four counts

of incest; and one count each of statutory rape, child molestation, and aggravated

sexual battery. With the exception of the aggravated sexual battery count, Connelly’s

convictions were affirmed on appeal. See Connelly v. State, 295 Ga. App. 765 (673

SE2d 274) (2009). Connelly subsequently filed an extraordinarymotion for new trial.

The trial court denied the motion, and Connelly filed this direct appeal.

An order denying an extraordinary motion for a new trial must be appealed by

application for discretionary appeal. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (7); Balkcom v. State,

227 Ga. App. 327, 329 (489 SE2d 129) (1997). Accordingly, we lack jurisdiction

over this direct appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

May 09, 2017

05/09/2017
#### § 13.960 Who determines when there is adequate snow cover?

The superintendent will determine when snow cover is adequate for snowmachine use. The superintendent will follow the procedures in §§ 1.5 and 1.7 of this chapter to inform the public.
**EXHIBIT 32**

**SECTION 1350CERTIFICATIONS**

Theundersigned hereby certify that the quarterly report on Form 10-Q ofInsight Communications Company, Inc. (the “Registrant”) for the quarterended March 31, 2006, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Registrant.

|   | /s/ Michael S. Willner                    |
|--------|-------------------------------------------|
|   | Michael S. Willner                        |
|   | Vice Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
|   | May 10, 2006                         |

 

|   | /s/  John Abbot                                      |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------|
|   | John Abbot                                           |
|   | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|   | May 10, 2006                                    |

 

----
#### § 13.1142 Can I appeal denial of my commercial fishing lifetime access permit application?

Yes—If an applicant's request for a commercial fishing lifetime access permit is denied, the superintendent will provide the applicant with the reasons for the denial in writing within 15 days of the decision. The applicant may appeal to the Regional Director, Alaska Region, within 180 days. The appeal must substantiate the basis of the applicant's disagreement with the Superintendent's determination. The Regional Director (or his representative) will meet with the applicant to discuss the appeal within 30 days of receiving the appeal. Within 15 days of receipt of written materials and the meeting, if requested, the Regional Director will affirm, reverse, or modify the Superintendent's determination and explain the reasons for the decision in writing. A copy of the decision will be forwarded promptly to the applicant and will be the final agency action.
Date of 

report 

1967 

Sept.20 

20 

NINETIETH CONGRESS 

FIRST SESSION-Began January 10, 1967 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Pre pared under the direction of FRANCIS R. V ALEO, Secretary of the Senate 

By GERALD A. HACKE1 r, Executive Clerk 

Thursday, September 21, 1967 

NOMINATIONS 

Calendar I Message Name of nommee Office Predecessor 

No. No 

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

GOVERNMENT 

1163 345 Walter E. Washington, of Commissioner of the Dis- New position. 

the District of Colum- tnct of Columbia for a 

bia. term expiring Feb. 1, 

1969. 

1163 345 Thomas W. Fletcher, of Assistant to the Commis- Do. 

the District of Colum- sioner of the District of 

bia. Columbia. 

85-022--67--No.9& 

U S GOVERNMENT PRINTI NG OFFICE l!illi7
EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. SS. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Innovative Software  Technologies,  Inc.
(the  "Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending March 31, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Linda W. Kerecman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

          (1)  the Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  the information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
               material  respects,   the  financial   condition  and  result  of
               operations of the Company.



-----------------------
Linda W. Kerecman
Chief Financial Officer
May 24, 2004
# EUR-Lex - 12008E267 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008E267

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - PART SIX: INSTITUTIONAL AND FINANCIAL PROVISIONS - TITLE I: INSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS - Chapter 1: The institutions - Section 5: The Court of Justice of the European Union - Article 267 (ex Article 234 TEC) **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0164 - 0164 *

Article 267

(ex Article 234 TEC)

The Court of Justice of the European Union shall have jurisdiction to give preliminary rulings concerning:

(a) the interpretation of the Treaties;

(b) the validity and interpretation of acts of the institutions, bodies, offices or agencies of the Union;

Where such a question is raised before any court or tribunal of a Member State, that court or tribunal may, if it considers that a decision on the question is necessary to enable it to give judgment, request the Court to give a ruling thereon.

Where any such question is raised in a case pending before a court or tribunal of a Member State against whose decisions there is no judicial remedy under national law, that court or tribunal shall bring the matter before the Court.

If such a question is raised in a case pending before a court or tribunal of a Member State with regard to a person in custody, the Court of Justice of the European Union shall act with the minimum of delay.

--------------------------------------------------
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

# Date And Time:

*Tuesday, October 17, 2006 at 10 a.m.*

# Place:

999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC.

# Status:

This meeting will be closed to the public.

# Items to be Discussed:

Compliance matters pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g. Audits conducted pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g, 438(b), and Title 26, U.S.C. Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings or arbitration. Internal personal rules and procedures or matters affecting a particular employee.

# Date And Time:

*Wednesday, October 18, 2006 at 10 a.m.*

# Place:

999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC (Ninth floor).

# Status:

This meeting will be open to the public.

# Items to be Discussed:

Correction and Approval of Minutes.

*Advisory Opinion 2006-27:*                         Prime Choice Entertainment by Cynthia Czuchaj.                    

*Advisory Opinion 2006-28:*                         59th Republican Ward Executive Committee by Peter J. Wirs, Chairman. Embezzlement Enforcement Policy. Management and Administrative Matters.                    

# Person to Contact for Information:

Mr. Robert Biersack, Press Officer.

Mary W. Dove,

Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 06-8679 Filed 10-11-06; 9:57 am]

BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
Editorial Note on Part 660
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 660 appear at 67 FR 65906, Oct. 29, 2002, 88 FR 81358, Nov. 22, 2023.

§ 660.708 Reporting and recordkeeping. ( a ) *Logbooks.* The operator of any commercial fishing vessel and any recreational charter vessel fishing for HMS in the management area must maintain on board the vessel an accurate and complete record of catch, effort, and other data on report forms provided by the Regional Administrator or a state agency. All information specified on the forms must be recorded on the forms within 24 hours after the completion of each fishing day. The original logbook form for each day of the fishing trip must be submitted to either the Regional Administrator or the appropriate state management agency within 30 days of each landing or transhipment of HMS. Each form must be signed and dated by the fishing vessel operator. ( 1 ) Logbooks that meet the logbook reporting requirement may be found at *http://swr.nmfs.noaa.gov/logbooks.htm* and include: ( i ) The logbook required under 50 CFR 300.21 implementing the Tuna Conventions Act of 1950;
( ii ) The logbook required under § 660.14 implementing the Fishery Management Plan for Pelagic Fisheries of the Western Pacific Region;
( iii ) Any logbook required by the fishery management agency of the States of California, Oregon, or Washington.
( 2 ) Any holder of a permit who does not submit logbooks under any of the above authorities must submit a written request to the SFD for the appropriate logbook. The applicant must provide his or her name and address, the name of the vessel, and the type of fishing gear used.
( 3 ) The Regional Administrator may, after consultation with the Council, act to modify the information to be provided on the fishing record forms.
( b ) Any person who is required to do so by the applicable state law must make and/or file, retain, or make available any and all reports of HMS containing all data, and in the exact manner, required by the applicable state law.
[69 FR 18453, Apr. 7, 2004, as amended at 80 FR 62501, Oct. 16, 2015]
EXHIBIT 31.2 RULE 13a-14(a) CERTIFICATION I,
Jane Morlok, certify that: 1.          I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB-A of Breda Telephone Corp.; 2.          Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3.          Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4.          The
small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have: (a) Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
  controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
  material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
  consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
  entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
  prepared;(b) Evaluated
the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure
  controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about
  the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
  the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(c) Disclosed
in this report any change in the small business issuers internal
  control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
  issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth
  fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected,
  or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers
  internal control over financial reporting; and 5.          The
small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small
business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions): (a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
  operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
  likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record,
  process, summarize and report financial information; and(b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
  employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal
  control over financial reporting.  Date:  November 15, 2006.

/s/ Jane MorlokJane Morlok, Chief
  Financial Officer E-2
FILED

August 4, 1999

Cecil Crowson, Jr.

Appellate C ourt

Clerk

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT KNOXVILLE

JULY SESSION, 1999

STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) C.C.A. NO. 03C01-9809-CC-00330

)

Appellee, )

)

) BLOUNT COUNTY

VS. )

) HON. D. KELLY THOMAS, JR.

RICHARD MILBURN WHITE, ) JUDGE

)

Appellant. ) (Sentencing)

ON APPEAL FROM THE JUDGMENT OF THE

CRIMINAL COURT OF BLOUNT COUNTY

FOR THE APPELLANT: FOR THE APPELLEE:

SHAWN G. GRAHAM PAUL G. SUMMERS

Assistant District Public Defender Attorney General and Reporter

419 High Street

Maryville, TN 37804 ERIK W. DAAB

Assistant Attorney General

425 Fifth Avenue North

Nashville, TN 37243

MIKE FLYNN

District Attorney General

WILLIAM REED

Assistant District Attorney General

363 Court Street

Maryville, TN 37804

OPINION FILED ________________________

AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE W ITH RULE 20

DAVID H. WELLES, JUDGE
-2-

OPINION

The Defendant, Richard Milburn W hite, was convicted, upon his pleas of

guilty, of three counts of forgery, three counts of uttering a forged writing, one

count of assault, and one count of aggravated assault. In exchange for his guilty

pleas, he agreed to an effective sentence of five years as a Range I standard

offender, with the manner of service of the sentences left to the discretion of the

trial judge. After conducting a sentencing hearing, the judge ordered that the

sentences be served in the Department of Correction. The Defendant appeals

from the trial judge’s order. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

In denying the Defendant any form of alternative sentencing, the trial judge

noted the Defendant’s long history of criminal conduct and convictions, observed

that prior sentences not involving jail had apparently been unsuccessful in

rehabilitating the Defendant, and pointed out that the Defendant appeared to

exhibit a continuing and escalating pattern of assaults and violence. The judge

also noted that the assault in the case at bar occurred while the Defendant was

on probation for a previous assault and that the aggravated assault was

committed in violation of a restraining order.

The record clearly supports the findings of the trial judge. We are unable

to conclude that the trial judge erred or abused his discretion by ordering that the

Defendant’s sentences be served in the Department of Correction. We conclude

that no error of law requiring a reversal of the judgment is apparent on the record.

Based upon a thorough reading of the record, the briefs of the parties, and the
-3-

law governing the issues presented for review, the judgem ent of the trial court is

affirmed in accordance with Rule 20 of the Court of Criminal Appeals of

Tennessee.

____________________________________

DAVID H. WELLES, JUDGE

CONCUR:

___________________________________

GARY R. WADE, PRESIDING JUDGE

___________________________________

JOE G. RILEY, JUDGE
### Exhibit 31.1

### Certification under Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of

### Rick L. Hurt, Secretary, Treasurer, Director

I, Rick L. Hurt, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of
Intermountain Refining Co., Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I
are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
small business issuer and have:

> Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
> such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
> ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, is made
> known to us by others within the entity, particularly during the period in which
> this report is being prepared;
> Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
> disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
> about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
> of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
> Disclosed in this report any change in the small business
> issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
> small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or
> is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's control
> over financial reporting; and

1. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I
have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the small
business issuer's board of directors:

> All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
> design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
> reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to
> record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
> Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
> or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
> internal control over financial
> reporting.

Date: July 10,
2007/s/ Rick L.
Hurt________Rick L. Hurt, Treasurer, Secretary,
Director
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 03123**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket** **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  x 03123\03123_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

03123\03123_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 03123\03123_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 03123\03123_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file x 03123\03123_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file x 03123\03123_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file x 03123\03123_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file x 03123\03123_Part E.xls Plant submitted survey file x 03123\03123_Part F.xls Plant submitted survey file x 03123\03123_Part G.xls Plant submitted survey file x 03123\03123_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

03123\Certification Statement Plant ID 03123.pdf Plant certification statement x 03123\Follow up\03123_Email Correspondence.pdf Email communications regarding questions on the survey response x 03123\Follow up\03123_Email Correspondence_Response.pdf Email communications regarding questions on the survey response x 03123\Follow up\Beckjord Ash Deposition.xlsx Plant submitted survey file x 03123\Follow up\Beckjord Plant ID 03123.docx Draft Questions for Follow Up x 03123\Follow up\Part C Sect 2_1 Units 1 through 4.xlsx Plant submitted survey file x 03123\Supplemental Documents\Beckjord A5-3 and D3-1 Rev1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 03123\Supplemental Documents\Beckjord F5-6 Pond and GW well locations.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

03123\Supplemental Documents\Diagram G3-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 03123\Supplemental Documents\WC Beckjord A5-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

03123\Supplemental Documents\CBI Substantiation\Duke Energy_EIP FOIA.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in theSteam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
§ 214.12 Responsive statement and reply. ( a ) *Responsive statement.* The Responsible Official shall prepare a responsive statement addressing the factual and legal allegations in the appeal. The responsive statement and any supporting documentation shall be filed with the Appeal Deciding Officer within 20 days of receipt of the appeal or the unsuccessful conclusion of mediation conducted pursuant to 36 CFR part 222, subpart B, whichever is later.
( b ) *Reply.* Within 10 days of receipt of the responsive statement, the appellant and intervenors, if any, may file a reply with the Appeal Deciding Officer addressing the contentions in the responsive statement.
# EUR-Lex - 12007P013 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12007P013

**Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - TITLE II - FREEDOMS - Article 13 - Freedom of the arts and sciences **

*
Official Journal 303 , 14/12/2007 P. 0005 - 0005 *

Article 13

Freedom of the arts and sciences

The arts and scientific research shall be free of constraint. Academic freedom shall be respected.

--------------------------------------------------
§ 261.22 Unauthorized use of “Smokey Bear” and “Woodsy Owl” symbol. ( a ) Manufacture, importation, reproduction, or use of “Smokey Bear” except as provided under §§ 271.2, 271.3, or 271.4 is prohibited.
( b ) Manufacture, importation, reproduction, or use of “Woodsy Owl” except as provided under §§ 272.2, 272.3, or 272.4 is prohibited.
[42 FR 2957, Jan. 14, 1977; 42 FR 24739, May 16, 1977. Redesignated at 70 FR 68291, Nov. 9, 2005]