alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Hillsborough,

No. 4995.

#### Milton E. Elliott *v.*Gordon M. Ferguson.

Argued December 5, 1961.

Decided January 29, 1962.

*28
      *Wyman, Bean & Tefft (Mr. Wyman*orally), for the plaintiff.

*Tiffany A Osborne (Mr. Tiffany*orally), for the defendant.

Blandin, J.

The fundamental question posed by the agreed facts is whether the plaintiff has a right of way of necessity across the defendant’s land.

The law in this state is in accord with what we consider the more sensible rule that reasonable necessity is required to create a presumption of an implied grant of a way of necessity. See *Goudie*v. *Fisher,*79 N. H. 424, 425; *Farmington Library Association*v. *Trafton,*84 N. H. 29, 31. In support of this rule, see also 28 C.J.S., Easements, s. 35(b); 3 Tiffany, Real Property (3d *ed.) s.*794, *p.*293. This principle is consistent with the tenor of our law which stresses the rule of reasonableness, rather than of rigidity. *Sakansky*v. *Wein,*86 N. H. 337, 339; *Bean v. Dow,*84 N. H. 464, 469.

However, since the doctrine rests upon the theory of an implied grant, the circumstances surrounding the transaction are controlling and they must be such as to raise a “reasonable implication of right granted.” *Bean*v. *Dow, supra,*469. The question before us here is whether the situation was such that the parties “could not in reason have understood . . . otherwise” than that the right of way which the plaintiff claims was granted. *Id.,*470.

Applying this test to the agreed facts, it appears that the land has never been used for anything but a summer camp, and there is no “persuasive evidence” that either the plaintiff or his predecessor ever reached the property by means other than by crossing the lake. The parties agree that the plaintiff had an undisclosed intention to build a year-round home when he purchased the lot some seven years after it was first severed from the larger tract. Obviously this cannot lend weight to the argument that his predecessor Dodge and Dodge’s grantor had previously by implication intended a grant of a right of way sufficient to support the needs of such a home.

In conclusion, the burden was upon the plaintiff to establish his claim, Without detailing the facts hereinbefore stated, it seems apparent that we cannot hold on the record before us that he has sustained that burden.

The order is

*Petition dismissed.*

All concurred.
#### § 1281.10 When does a foundation consult with NARA before offering a gift of a physical or material change, or addition to an existing library?

A foundation must consult with the Office of Presidential Libraries before beginning the process of offering a gift for the purpose of making a physical or material change or addition to a new or existing library. NARA will furnish the interested foundation the current architectural and design standards as specified in § 1281.4. Others may request a single copy by writing the Office of Presidential Libraries (NL), Room 2200, 8601 Adelphi Road, College Park, Maryland 20740-6001.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

KIMBERLY HENDER-MOODY,

Petitioner

v.

AMERICAN HERITAGE FEDERAL CREDIT 

UNION (WORKERS' COMPENSATION 

APPEAL BOARD),

Respondents

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 127 MAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the 

Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 23rd day of August, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
§ 294.45 Environmental documentation. ( a ) Environmental documentation will be prepared pursuant to Section 102 of the National Environmental Policy Act, 40 CFR part 1500, and 36 CFR part 220 for any proposed action within a Colorado Roadless Area. Proposed actions that would significantly alter the undeveloped character of a Colorado Roadless Area require an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS).
( b ) The Forest Service will offer cooperating agency status to the State of Colorado, for all proposed projects and planning activities subject to this rule that would be implemented on lands within Colorado Roadless Areas. Where the Forest Service does not have the authority to offer formal cooperating agency status, the Forest Service shall offer to coordinate with the State.
#### Alter Kushes, Appellant, *v.*Isidore Ginsberg, Respondent.

(Argued May 3, 1907;

decided May 21, 1907.)

*Kushes*v. *Ginsberg,*99 App. Div. 417, affirmed. */*

Appeal from a judgment entered July 13, 1905, upon an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, which affirmed an interlocutory judgment of Special Term sustaining a demurrer to the complaint in an action by a husband to recover for the loss of services of his wife through personal injuries alleged to have been occasioned by defendant’s negligence.

*Benjamin Tuslca*for appellant.

*Garl Sdhurz Petraseh*and *Henry 8. Mansfield*foi respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Cli. J., Gray, O’Brien, Yann,Werner, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 199 (Monday, October 16, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60750-60751]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-8712]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[CA-310-0777-XG]


Notice of Public Meeting: Northwest California Resource Advisory 
Council

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Land Policy and Management Act 
of 1976 (FLPMA), and the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (FACA), 
the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) 
Northwest California Resource Advisory Council will meet as indicated 
below.

DATES: The meeting will be held Thursday and Friday, Dec. 7 and 8, 
2006, in Redding, California. On Dec. 7, the members will convene at 
the BLM Redding Field Office, 355 Hemsted Dr., and depart immediately 
for a field trip to the upland areas of the Sacramento River Bend Area 
of Critical Environmental Concern. Members of the public are welcome on 
the tour. They must provide their own transportation and lunch. On Dec. 
8, the meeting begins at 8 a.m. in the Conference Room of the Redding 
Field Office. Time for public comments is reserved for 11 a.m.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lynda Roush, BLM Arcata Field Office 
manager, (707) 825-2300; or BLM Public Affairs Officer Joseph J. 
Fontana, (530) 252-5332.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 12-member council advises the Secretary 
of the Interior, through the BLM, on a variety of planning and 
management issues associated with public land management in Northwest 
California. At this meeting, agenda items include discussion of RAC 
involvement in developing recreation fee business plans, an update on 
development of a management plan for the South Spit at Humboldt Bay, 
resource management issues associated with abalone harvest offshore 
from the Stornetta Public Lands and an update on recovery from 
wildfire. The RAC members will also hear status reports from the 
Arcata, Redding and Ukiah field office managers. All meetings are open 
to the public. Members of the public may present written comments to 
the council. Each formal council meeting will have time allocated for 
public comments. Depending on the number of persons wishing to speak, 
and the time available, the time for individual comments may be 
limited. Members of

[[Page 60751]]

the public are welcome on field tours, but they must provide their own 
transportation and lunch. Individuals who plan to attend and need 
special assistance, such as sign language interpretation and other 
reasonable accommodations, should contact the BLM as provided above.

    Dated: October 6, 2006.
Joseph J. Fontana,
Public Affairs Officer.
[FR Doc. 06-8712 Filed 10-13-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-40-M
# EUR-Lex - 12004V407 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V407

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART III — THE POLICIES AND FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - TITLE VI — THE FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - CHAPTER II — FINANCIAL PROVISIONS - Section 3 — Implementation of the budget and discharge - Article III-407 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0177 - 0177 *

Article III-407

The Commission shall implement the budget in cooperation with the Member States, in accordance with the European law referred to in Article III-412, on its own responsibility and within the limits of the appropriations allocated, having regard to the principles of sound financial management. Member States shall cooperate with the Commission to ensure that the appropriations are used in accordance with those principles.

The European law referred to in Article III-412 shall establish the control and audit obligations of the Member States in the implementation of the budget and the resulting responsibilities. It shall establish the responsibilities and detailed rules for each institution concerning its part in effecting its own expenditure.

Within the budget the Commission may, subject to the limits and conditions laid down by the European law referred to in Article III-412, transfer appropriations from one chapter to another or from one subdivision to another.

--------------------------------------------------
```

[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 197 (Thursday, October 12, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 60222]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-8537]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 5574]

Department of State Performance Review Board Members (at Large 
Board)

    In accordance with section 4314(c)(4) of the Civil Service Reform 
Act of 1978 (Pub. L. 95-454), the Executive Resources Board of the 
Department of State has appointed the following individuals to the 
Department of State Performance Review Board (At-Large):

Susan Burk, Deputy Coordinator for Homeland Security, Office of the 
Secretary, Department of State;
John Kim, Assistant Legal Adviser for Treaty Affairs, Office of Legal 
Adviser, Department of State;
William Todd, Deputy Inspector General, Office of the Inspector 
General, Department of State;
Gretchen Welch, Director, Office of Policy, Planning and Resources, 
Office of the Under Secretary for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs, 
Department of State; (Outside Member)
Ruth Whiteside, Director, Office of the Director, Foreign Service 
Institute, Department of State;

    Dated: September 15, 2006.
George M. Staples,
Director General of the Foreign Service and Director of Human 
Resources, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 06-8537 Filed 10-11-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-15-M
```
<PAGE>



EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                        PURSUANT TO 18U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ace Marketing & Promotions, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Sean
McDonnell, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

                                                         /S/ SEAN MCDONNELL
                                                         ------------------
                                                         SEAN MCDONNELL
                                                         CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                                         AUGUST 21, 2006
#### J. Frank Barr, Respondent, *v.*The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant.

(Argued April 22, 1907;

decided May 7, 1907.)

*Barr*v. *N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co.,*112 App. Div. 901, affirmed.

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered March 1Y, 1906, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been caused by defendant’s negligence.

*616
      *Henry Purcell*for appellant.

*Irvine) G. Hobbs*for respondent.

-Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, "Werneb and Willard Bartlett, JJ. Not sitting: G-ray, J. Absent: Hiscook, J.
Order - 1

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

Supreme Court No. DA 22-0571

STATE OF MONTANA,

 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v.

TRISTAN MICHAEL LANGFORD,

Defendant and Appellant.

_________________________________________________________________

ORDER

__________________________________________________________________

Upon consideration of Appellant’s Unopposed Motion for Extension 

of Time, and good cause appearing, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including June 7, 2024, within which to prepare, file, and 

serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed and dated as indicated below.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 31 2024

05/31/2024

Case Number: DA 22-0571
§ 64.2 Definitions. ( a ) *Abandoned Railroad Rights-of-Way.* An abandoned railroad right-of-way is the real property used for or formerly used for the operation of railroad trains by a common carrier railroad, upon which the railroad company has, or will cease operations and sell, or otherwise dispose of the company's interest in the real property.
( b ) *Project Applicant.* Federal, State, or local governmental agencies.
### .. : , 

# CONSUMER MARGINAL ENERGY RATES James E. McMahon, LBNL Presentation to DOE Workshop on Standards for Clothes Washers December 15, 1998 1

### What are average and marginal prices? (1) average price

## = total annual energy bill total annual energy use (orapprovedclass revenues I approvedclass sales) (2) marginal price

## =change in total annual energy bill change in total annual energy use (3) The difference between marginal and average is defined as: epsilon (e) = (marginal-average)/average (e.g., ifepsilon= 0.90, then marginal is 10°10 less than average price. Ifepsilon= 1.06, then marginal is 6°10 greaterthan average price.) 2

# What's changing? • PREVIOUSLY: Consumerenergy bill savings were estimated using average energy prices 

### (national or by**utility)~** • NEWAPPROACH: Estimated consumer 

### marginal energy rates will be used in calculating energy bill savings 

### for households orbuildings. In otherwords, the energy savings will be valued atthe margin, notataverage 

### . ·energy pnces.

3

## Consumer Marginal Energy Rates: Method • Obtain database ofindividual customers or buildings • Design nationally representative sample of customers • Collecttariff information • Develop and test method for matching tariffs with customers (buildings) • Calculate marginal rates forsample buildings • Use sample marginal rates as estimates of population marginal rates 4

### Extract consumer marginal energy rates • Each sample building has baseline energy use data and can be assigned to a tariff • Calculate monthly energy bills (baseline)for sample • Calculate annual energy savings dueto standards. • Distribute annual energy savings to months • Calculate monthly energy bills forsample under standards. (Hourlyfortime-of-use customers.) • Use sample marginal rates as estimates of national marginal rates. Calculate bill savings. 5

# Data Sources • Buildings database (MAISY)

- ca. 90,000 commercial; 60,000 residential

- is stratified by state

- provides energy-related customercharacteristics

- has household load profiles • Tariffs

- web-sites (subset ofAPPA, EEi, NRECA utilities)

- commercial vendors

- public utility commissions

- individual utilities • Monthly end use load profiles

- published literature

- utility studies 6
Hi I'm Marina and we are from Santa fe‘ 

We started the global warming express because we were concerned about 

climate change issues. We have wrote a book and now we are learning about 

how to give speeches and work with our government around how to make 

changes in Our city state and country. We are mostly concerned about how fast 

fossil fuels are adding to global warming. Every summer temperatures climb and 

fires are more frequent and more intense. Most summers I cant seem to sleep 

because of how hot it is. There is ash falling out of the sky from the fires. Which 

means my allergies grow more intense. And think about our animals what can do 

to help them? They will burn and die because of the fires we cause as humans. 

Even if we stopped using coal, natural gas and oil right now it would take at least 

20 more years for climate change to slow down. We have caused enough trouble 

already on our earth and so we should be the ones to stop it. No one told me to 

say this I'm saying it because I care about our climate and about my future life. 

My wish is that you all consider what we are doing to our Climate. We have a 

short song for you, enjoy! 

- 

G° u3c
#### § 72.70 Applicability.

These post-completion responsibilities apply to each area or facility for which Urban Park and Recreation Recovery (UPARR) program assistance is obtained, regardless of the extent of participation of the program in the assisted area or facility. Responsibility for compliance with these provisions rests with the grant recipient. The responsibilities cited herein are applicable to the 1010 area depicted or otherwise described in the 1010 boundary map and/or as described in other project documentation approved by the Department of the Interior. In many instances, this area exceeds that actually receiving UPARR assistance so as to assure the protection of a viable recreation entity. For leased sites assisted under UPARR, compliance with post-completion requirements of the grant following lease expiration is dictated by the terms of the project agreement.
#### William Stanton, Appellant, *v.*International Railway Company, Respondent.

(Argued April 4, 1907;

decided April 23, 1907.)

*Stanton*v. *International Railway Co.,*109 App. Div. 910, affirmed.

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered November 21, 1905, which reversed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial and granted a new trial in an action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been received through defendant’s negligence.

*Philip A. Laing*for appellant.

*Charles B. Sears*for respondent.

Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered against appellant on the stipulation, with costs in all courts; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., O’Brien, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Yann and Chase, JJ. Not sitting: Hiscóck, J.
EXHIBIT 31.1

             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(D)/15D-14(D)
                  UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
I, Anthony N. Renzi, certify that:
1. I have  reviewed  this  report  on Form  10-K and all  reports  on Form  10-D
   required to be filed in respect of the period  covered by this report on Form
   10-K of RASC Series 2006-EMX6 Trust (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");
2. Based on my knowledge,  the Exchange Act periodic reports,  taken as a whole,
   do not contain  any untrue  statement  of a material  fact or omit to state a
   material  fact  necessary  to make  the  statements  made,  in  light  of the
   circumstances  under which such  statements  were made, not  misleading  with
   respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based  on  my  knowledge,  all  of  the  distribution,  servicing  and  other
   information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by
   this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;
4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities  performed by the servicers and
   based on my knowledge and the compliance  reviews  conducted in preparing the
   servicer  compliance  statements  required in this report  under Item 1123 of
   Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic  reports,
   the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements
   in all material respects; and
5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance  with  servicing  criteria for
   asset-backed  securities and their related  attestation reports on assessment
   of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to
   be included in this report in accordance  with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and
   Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
   report,  except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances
   of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report
   on Form 10-K.

In giving the  certifications  above,  I have  reasonably  relied on information
provided to me by the following  unaffiliated parties:  Mortgage Lenders Network
USA, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association.


Date:  March 26, 2007

By:   /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
      --------------------
      Name: Anthony N. Renzi
      Title: Managing Director
#### David D. Augsbury, as Administrator with the Will Annexed of Sarah A. Roof, Deceased, Appellant, *v.*Loren F. Shurtliff, Respondent.

*Augsbury*v. *Shurtliff,*114 App. Div. 626, affirmed.

(Argued October 22, 1907;

decided November 19, 1907.)

Appeal froili an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered July 19, 1906, which reversed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered" upon a verdict directed by the court and granted a new trial in an action to recover possession of a bank book issued to plaintiff’s intestate.

*E. C. Emerson*and *George W. Beeves*for appellant.

*John ]V. Carlisle*for respondent.

Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered against appellant on the stipulation, with costs in all courts; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ. Not voting: O’Brien, J.
Data of 

report 

1970 

Feb. 13 

Date of 

report 

1970 

Feb. 25 

25 

26 

&ruatr nf tqr luttrb ~tatts NINETY-FIRST CONGRESS 

F S fConvened January 3, 1969 

IRST ESSION 1Adjourned December 23, 1969 

SECOND SESSION {Collvened January 19, 1970 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Prepared under the direction of FRANCIS R. VALEO, Secretary of the Senate 

By GERALD A. HACKETT, Executive Clerk 

Friday, February 27, 1970 

TREATY 

Calendar Treaty No. SubJect Action of oommJttee 

No. 

1 Ex. A (9lst Cong., Intellectual and industrial property con- Reported favorably by 

1st sess.) ventions. Mr. Fulbright, from 

the Committee on 

Foreign Relations, 

with a printed report. (See Ex. Rept. 

No. 91-13, 9lst Cong., 

2d sess.) 

NOMINATIONS 

Calendar Message Name of nommee 01llce Predecessor 

No. No. 

U.S. MARSHALS 

18 13 Arthur F. Van Court, of U.S. marshal for the east- John C. Begovich. 

California. ern district of California 

for the term of 4 years. 

19 41 Carl H. Slayback, of U.S. marshal for the south- James J. Moos, 

Illinois. ern district of Illinois for re;;igned. 

the term of 4 years. 

[NEW REPORT] 

DEPARTMENT OF 

DEFENSE 

20 46 Theodore C. Marrs, of Deputy Assistant Secre- Ernest Louis Massad, 

Alabama. tary of Defense for resigned. 

Reserve Affairs. 

37-022-70--No. 137 

U S GOVERNME:N r PRINTING OFFICE I tHO