alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EUR-Lex - 12006E092 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12006E092

**Treaty establishing the European Community (consolidated version) - Part Three - Community policies - TITLE VI - Common rules on competition, taxation and approximation of laws - Chapter 2 - Tax provisions - Article 92 **

*
Official Journal C 321 E , 29/12/2006 P. 0079 - 0079 Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0068 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0213 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0031 - Consolidated version (EEC Treaty - no official publication available) *

Article 92

In the case of charges other than turnover taxes, excise duties and other forms of indirect taxation, remissions and repayments in respect of exports to other Member States may not be granted and countervailing charges in respect of imports from Member States may not be imposed unless the measures contemplated have been previously approved for a limited period by the Council acting by a qualified majority on a proposal from the Commission.

--------------------------------------------------
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, *v.*William Dixon, Respondent.

*People*v. *Dixon,*118 App. Div. 593, appeal dismissed.

(Submitted December 9, 1907;

decided December 10, 1907.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered March 13,1907, which reversed a judgment of the Onondaga County Court rendered upon a verdict convicting the defendant of the crime of burglary in the third degree and granted a new trial.

*William I. Barnum*for appellant.

*Harley J. Grane*for respondent.

Appeal dismissed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Hisoook, JJ.
Date of 

report 

1967 

June 7 

NINET IETH CONGRESS 

FIRST SESSION-Began January 10, 1967 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Prepared under the dtrectron of FRANCIS R VALEO, Secretary of the Senate 

By GERALD A. HACKETT, Execuhve Clerk 

Thursday, June 8, 1967 

NOMINATION 

Calendar Message Name of nominee O.f!lce Predecesaor 

No No 

DEPARTMENT OF 

COMMERCE 

4()8 201 Alel'..ander B Trowbndge, Secretary of Commerce ____ 

of New York 

NOMINATIONS PLACED ON THE SECRETARY'S DESK 

In the Envrronmental Scrence Services Admmrstrat10n 

The nomm tion~ begmmng Terry C de Ia Mormrere, to be lieutenant, and endmg Denms L Graves, to be 

ensrgn, whwh nomma twns were recerved by the Senat e and appeared m the CongressiOnal Record on May 16, 

1967 

65-022-67-No 55 

U S GO VER NMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1967
#### § 222.65 Protection of wild free-roaming horses and burros when they are upon other than the National Forest System or public lands.

Individual animals and herds of wild free-roaming horses and burros will be under the protection of the Chief, Forest Service, even though they may thereafter move to lands of other ownership or jurisdiction as a part of their annual territorial habitat pattern or for other reasons. The Chief will exercise surveillance of these animals through the use of cooperative agreements and as otherwise authorized by law and act immediately through appropriate administrative or criminal and civil judicial procedures to provide them the protective measures of the Act at any time he has cause to believe its provisions are being violated.
Date of 

report 

1967 

Apr 14 

NINETIETH CONGRESS 

fiRST SESSION-Began January 10, 1967 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Prepa1 ed under the dnectzon of FRANCISR VALEO, Secretary of the Senate 

By GERALD A. HACKETT, Executive Clerk 

Monday, May 15, 1967 

NOMINATION 

Calendar Mes~age Name of nominee Office Predecessor 

No No 

AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT 

192 8b Rutherford M Poats, of Deputy Adrmrustrator, 

Vrrgmra Agency for Internatwnal 

Development 

*(Star Print) 6o-022-67-No 50 

US GOVERNMENT PRINTUtG OFFICE: 111'7
~ruutr nf tijr luttr~ ~ttttrs NINETY-FIRST CONGRESS 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Prepared under the direction of FRANcis R. V ALEO, Secretary of the Senate 

By GERALD A. HACKETT, Executive Clerk 

Friday, November 21, 1969 

UNANIMOUS-CONSENT AGREEMENTS 

Ordered, That at 1 p.m. on Fr1day, Nov 21, 1969, the Senate proceed to vote on the nommation of Clement 

F. Haynsworth, Jr., of South Carolina, to be an AssoCiate Justice of the Supreme Court of the Umted States 

(Nov 18, 1iJ89) 

Ordered, That on Fr1day, Nov 21, 1969, after the Senate convenes, that theie be a period of 30 minutes 

for the transaction of routme roornmg bw;me~'l .1~ m legislative ~es~Ion, and th,tt the time thercaftei nntill o'clock 

be equally dtvided and controlled by the miiJonty and mmor1ty le.1ders or pei"on~ de:;umnted b} them 

(Sov. SO, 1989, 

NOMINATION 

Date or Calendar Message Name of nominee Otl!ce Predecessor 

report No. No. 

---- SUPREME COURT OF 

THE UNITED STATES 

1989 

Nov 12 677 610 Clement F Haynsworth, An Associate Justice of the [Reported favorably by 

Jr., of South Carolma Supreme Court of the Mr. Hruska, from 

United States. the Committee on 

the Judiciary, with 

in dJ.vidual VIews 

(See Ex. Rept. 

91-12, 9lst Cong., 

1st sese.)] 

S7-o22-69-No. 110 

U S GOVERNJIEHT PRINTlNG OFFlCE lilt
#### In the Matter of the Application of Fred Harding, Respondent, for a Writ of Habeas Corpus. George W. Evans, Appellant.

(Argued April 1, 1907;

decided April 16, 1907.)

*Matter of Harding,*112 App. Div. 907, affirmed.

, Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered March 26, 1906, which affirmed an order of the Ulster County Court discharging the petitioner, a judgment debtor, from custody.

*Charles II. Stage*for appellant.

*Joseph M. Fowler*for respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: O’Brien, Edward T. Bartlett, IIiscock and Chase, JJ. Dissenting: Cüllen, Ch. J., Haight and Vann, JJ. _
§ 702.3 Demonstrations. ( a ) Library buildings and grounds are designated as limited public forums, except for those areas designated as nonpublic forums. However, only Library grounds (defined in 2 U.S.C. 167j), not buildings, may be utilized for demonstrations, including assembling, marching, picketing, or rallying. In addition, as the need for the determination of other matters arises, the Librarian will determine what additional First Amendment activities may not be permitted in a limited public forum. In making such determination, The Librarian will consider only whether the intended activity is incompatible with the primary purpose and intended use of that area.
( b ) The Director, Integrated Support Services, shall designate certain Library grounds as available for demonstrations. Persons seeking to use such designated areas for the purpose of demonstrations shall first secure written permission from the Director, Integrated Support Services. An application for such permission shall be filed with Facility Services no later than four business days before the time of the proposed demonstration and shall include: ( 1 ) The name of the organization(s) or sponsor(s) of the demonstration;
( 2 ) The contact person's name and telephone number;
( 3 ) The proposed purpose of the demonstration;
( 4 ) The proposed location of the demonstration;
( 5 ) The date and hour(s) planned for the demonstration;
( 6 ) The anticipated number of demonstrators;
( 7 ) A concise statement detailing arrangements for the prompt cleanup of the site after the demonstration;
( 8 ) Any request for permission to use loudspeakers, microphones, or other amplifying devices, hand held or otherwise; and
( 9 ) A signed agreement by the applicant(s) to comply with Library regulations and terms and conditions established for the demonstration.
( c ) Upon receipt of an application, Facility Services shall forward the application, along with any comments and recommendations, to the Director, Integrated Support Services, within one business day of the office's receipt of said application. The Director, Integrated Support Services, shall respond to the request within three business days of his or her receipt of said application. The Director, Integrated Support Services, shall request advice from the Office of the General Counsel on any legal questions arising from said application.
( d ) Permission to demonstrate shall be based upon: ( 1 ) The availability of the requested location;
( 2 ) The likelihood that the demonstration will not interfere with Library operations or exceed city noise limitations as defined by District of Columbia regulations; and
( 3 ) The likelihood that the demonstration will proceed peacefully in the event that a volatile situation in the United States or abroad might lead to a potentially harmful threat toward the Capitol complex, including Library buildings and grounds.
| ·   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| ·   | The      information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the      financial condition and results of operations of the    Company. |
|--------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                   |   |                                                       |
|------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------|
|                   |   |                                                       |   |
| November      14, 2008 | By:    | /s/                                                   |   |
|                   |   | Mitchell      Cox                                          |   |
|                   |   | Chief      Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) |   |
|                   |   |                                                       |   |
#### § 223.145 Scope of suspension.

The scope of suspension shall be the same as that for debarment (see § 223.140), except that the procedures in § 223.143 shall be used in imposing suspension.
From: Stevens, William

To: Kordzi, Joe

Subject: RE: Updated Sargent & Lundy retrofit countrols - Cost Models

Date: Tuesday, December 17, 2013 12:59:50 PM

Joe –

Yes, but the addition of a check-box to include the cost of Aux Power in the VOM cost was just a

convenience for those who might be doing manual desktop calcs. 

IPM actually uses the %Aux Power value as a derate on the unit output, with the loss being optimally

made up by other units according to their relative long term economics.

Bill S

From: Kordzi, Joe 

Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2013 10:28 AM

To: Stevens, William

Subject: RE: Updated Sargent & Lundy retrofit countrols - Cost Models

Hi Bill,

For the new SDA cost model, page 7, it looks like there is now a check box that enables the user to

include or not include auxiliary power (M) in the VOM calculation. Is this correct – if you check the

box, then M gets included as VOMP?

It looks like the previous version (enclosed) just included an advisory that M should be used for

model input.

From: Stevens, William 

Sent: Monday, December 16, 2013 6:46 AM

To: Kordzi, Joe

Subject: Updated Sargent & Lundy retrofit countrols - Cost Models

Joe –

I was out of the office Friday. Sorry to have missed your call.

Here’s the link to our new IPMv5.13 documentation.

http://www.epa.gov/airmarkets/progsregs/epa-ipm/BaseCasev513.html

Retrofit controls are covered in Chapter 5.

Updated versions of the Sargent & Lundy cost models are listed as Attachments 5-1 thru 5-7.

Note that IPM does not always include all of the features that S&L includes. One example: ACI as

modeled in IPM uses only brominated carbon, whereas S&L allows user to select from three types of

sorbent.

Call anytime with questions/comments.

Bill

William Stevens
Senior Advisor - Power Technologies

Office of Atmospheric Programs

Clean Air Markets Division

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

stevens.william@epa.gov

202-343-9642
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

MARIO ESPARZA-CRUZ,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 09-50150

D.C. No. 3:08-CR-03513-LAB

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

Larry A. Burns, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 5, 2010** 

Before: RYMER, McKEOWN, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

Mario Esparza-Cruz appeals from the 75-month sentence imposed following

his guilty-plea conviction for importation of methamphetamine, in violation of 

FILED

APR 21 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-50150

21 U.S.C. §§ 952, 960. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we

affirm.

Esparza-Cruz contends that the district court erred by declining to apply a

minor role adjustment pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2 because the district court was

improperly influenced by its disagreement with prosecutorial charging policies.

Eaparza-Cruz also contends that he did not have the control over the drug

smuggling operation required to preclude application of the role adjustment. The

district court did not err as the record reflects that the district court’s denial was not

based upon improper considerations. Among other things, the district court relied

upon the fact that Esparza-Cruz was arrested with over two kilograms of

methamphetamine. See United States v. Hursh, 217 F.3d 761, 770 (9th Cir. 2000);

see also United States v. Lui, 941 F.2d 844, 849 (9th Cir. 1991).

We reject Esparza-Cruz’s contention, raised for the first time in his reply

brief, that the government is judicially estopped from arguing on appeal that a

minor role adjustment was unwarranted when it had advocated for it during

sentencing. See United States v. Bussell, 504 F.3d 956, 963 (9th Cir. 2007).

AFFIRMED.
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Canuto Jason Tarango

, * From the 70 th District Court

of Ector County,

Trial Court No. A

- 45,242

Vs. No. 11

- 16

- 00 109

- CR * May 25 , 2017

The State of Texas

, * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

(P anel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson, J. , and Bailey, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is error

in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s opi nion, w e modify

the judgment of the trial court to delete the restitution of $180 , and we dismiss the

appeal

.
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 203 (Tuesday, October 21, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 62947]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-24984]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Environmental Management Site-Specific Advisory Board, Portsmouth

AGENCY: Department of Energy (DOE).

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a meeting of the Environmental 
Management Site-Specific Advisory Board (EM SSAB), Portsmouth. The 
Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. No. 92-463, 86 Stat. 770) 
requires that public notice of this meeting be announced in the Federal 
Register.

DATES: Thursday, November 6, 2014; 6:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Ohio State University, Endeavor Center, 1862 Shyville Road, 
Piketon, Ohio 45661.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Greg Simonton, Alternate Deputy 
Designated Federal Officer, Department of Energy Portsmouth/Paducah 
Project Office, Post Office Box 700, Piketon, Ohio 45661, (740) 897-
3737, Greg.Simonton@lex.doe.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Purpose of the Board: The purpose of the Board is to make 
recommendations to DOE-EM and site management in the areas of 
environmental restoration, waste management and related activities.

Tentative Agenda

 Call to Order, Introductions, Review of Agenda
 Approval of September Minutes
 Deputy Designated Federal Officer's Comments
 Federal Coordinator's Comments
 Liaison's Comments
 Presentation
 Administrative Issues
 Subcommittee Updates
 Public Comments
 Final Comments from the Board
 Adjourn

    Public Participation: The meeting is open to the public. The EM 
SSAB, Portsmouth, welcomes the attendance of the public at its advisory 
committee meetings and will make every effort to accommodate persons 
with physical disabilities or special needs. If you require special 
accommodations due to a disability, please contact Greg Simonton at 
least seven days in advance of the meeting at the phone number listed 
above. Written statements may be filed with the Board either before or 
after the meeting. Individuals who wish to make oral statements 
pertaining to agenda items should contact Greg Simonton at the address 
or telephone number listed above. Requests must be received five days 
prior to the meeting and reasonable provision will be made to include 
the presentation in the agenda. The Deputy Designated Federal Officer 
is empowered to conduct the meeting in a fashion that will facilitate 
the orderly conduct of business. Individuals wishing to make public 
comments will be provided a maximum of five minutes to present their 
comments.
    Minutes: Minutes will be available by writing or calling Greg 
Simonton at the address and phone number listed above. Minutes will 
also be available at the following Web site: http://www.ports-ssab.energy.gov/.

    Issued at Washington, DC, on October 15, 2014.
Amy Bodette,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2014-24984 Filed 10-20-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
§ 223.301 Determination of type of contract or agreement. ( a ) *Use of a contract or agreement.* When the Forest Service initiates a project under this subpart, a determination will be made whether to use a contract or an agreement to implement the project.
( b ) *Type of contract.* If the Forest Service determines that a contract will be utilized: ( 1 ) *Procurement of service contracts.* When the value of timber or other forest products removed through the contract will be less than the total value of the service work items received by the Forest Service, the activity shall be considered a procurement of a service and a contract, for a period not to exceed 10 years, will be utilized as provided in § 223.303 or
( 2 ) *Sale of property contracts.* When the value of timber or other forest products removed through the contract is equal to or exceeds the total value of the service work items received by the Forest Service, the activity shall be considered a sale of property and a contract, for a period not to exceed 10 years, will be utilized as provided in § 223.304.
( c ) *Best interest of the government determination.* The Forest Service official who makes a determination under paragraph (b) of this section shall document in the contract file the basis for the determination that: ( 1 ) It is in the best interest of the government that a sale of property contract is more suitable for a contract that would otherwise be subject to paragraph (b)(1) of this section; or
( 2 ) It is in the best interest of the government that a procurement of service contract is more suitable for a contract that would otherwise be subject to paragraph (b)(2) of this section.
§ 86.77 How must I treat program income? ( a ) You must follow the applicable program income requirements at 2 CFR 200.80 and 200.307 if you earn program income during the period of performance.
( b ) We authorize the following options in the regulations cited at paragraph (a) of this section: ( 1 ) You may deduct the costs of generating program income from the gross income if you did not charge these costs to the grant. An example of costs that may qualify for deduction is maintenance of the BIG-funded facility that generated the program income.
( 2 ) Use the addition alternative for program income only if: ( i ) You describe the source and amount of program income in the project statement according to § 86.43(k)(2); and
( ii ) We approve your proposed use of the program income, which must be for one or more of the actions eligible for funding at § 86.11.
( 3 ) Use the deduction alternative for program income that does not qualify under paragraph (b)(2) of this section.
( c ) We do not authorize the cost-sharing or matching alternative in the regulations cited at paragraph (a) of this section.
( d ) For BIG Tier 1-State grants with multiple projects that you may complete at different times, we recommend that States seek our advice on how to apply for and manage grants to reduce unintended program income.
( e ) If your project is completed before the end of the period of performance, we recommend you notify us and ask for advice on how to adjust the period of performance to manage potential program income.
&tttutr nf tqt luitr~ &tatts 

NINETY-FIRST CONGRESS 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Prepared undet' the direction of FRANCIS R. V ALEO, Secretary of the Senate 

By GERALD A. HACKETT, Executive Clerk 

Monday, November 10, 1969 

UNANIMOUS-CONSENT AGREEMENT 

Ordered, That on Monday, November 10, 196\J, at 2 o'clock p m., the Senate proceed to vote on the resolution 

of ratification to Executive F, 91st CongreRs, first session, the Consular Convention with Belgium; to be followed 

bv a vote on the resolution of ratification to Executiw II, (Jist Congress, first session, ::tn agreement 1vith Canada 

o;1 adjustments in flood control payment,. 

(Xo11ember 7, 1969) 

TREATIES 

Date of Calendar Tteaty No. Subject 

I 

Act10u of committee 

report No. 

1969 __I NO\', 6 7 Ex. F (9lbt Cong., Con~ular Convention with Belgium _____ Reported favorably by 

1st SCb~.). I Mr. Fulbright, from 

the Committee on 

Foreign Relations, 

with a printed report. 

(See Ex. Rept. 91-10 

9bt Cong., lot sess.) 

6 8 Ex. H (9lst Cong., AQ,rcemcnt with C::mada on r~dju~tmenh in I Reported favorably b) 

1st sess.). flood control parnwnt~. : 1Ir. Fulbright, from 

I 

the Comrmttee on 

Foreign Relations, 

with a printed report 

(See Ex. Rept. 91-11 

9lst Cong., 1st sess.) 

-- --·-· 

37-022-69-No. 102 

II 8 QOVERNilr.NT PRINTING OF'riCE 19il9
----

            COUNCIL DECISION         

of 20 September 2005         

appointing three members and five alternate members of the Committee of the Regions

(2005/675/EC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 263 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Italian Government,

Whereas:

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following are hereby appointed to the Committee of the Regions for the remainder of the term of office still to run, namely until 25 January 2006:

Article 2

This Decision shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

It shall take effect on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 20 September 2005.

For the Council

The President

M. BECKETT            

----

(1)OJ L 24, 26.1.2002, p. 38.

----