alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| 1.   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the      dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company      for the periods presented. |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   By: |   /s/Steve Shum                                                            |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  Name:     |  Steve      Shum                                                                |
|  Title:    |  Principal      Executive Officer,Principal      Financial Officer and Director |
|  Date:     |  January      21, 2010                                                          |
MUR809200011
1

 The Honorable Dean Whipple, Chief Judge, United States District Court for

the Western District of Missouri.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 04-3378

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

*

v. * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

Willie L. Pittman, * Western District of Missouri.

*

Appellant. * [UNPUBLISHED]

___________

Submitted: October 4, 2005 

Filed: October 10, 2005

___________

Before ARNOLD, FAGG, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Willie Pittman pleaded guilty to possessing five or more grams of a mixture

containing cocaine base with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C.

§§ 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(B). Prior to the entry of Mr. Pittman’s guilty plea, the

government filed an information under 21 U.S.C. § 851 notifying the district court1

that Mr. Pittman was subject to increased penalties. The district court thereafter

imposed the mandatory minimum sentence dictated by the admitted-to drug quantity

and Mr. Pittman’s prior felony drug-trafficking conviction – 120 months'
-2-

imprisonment and 8 years' supervised release. On appeal, Mr. Pittman’s counsel,

filing a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), has moved to

withdraw. For reversal, he raises one issue: that the government should not have

been permitted to file its section 851 information.

Counsel’s argument fails: the government properly filed its information, and

the prior conviction increased the sentence under section 841(b)(1)(B) to a minimum

of 10 years. We also find no error under Blakely v. Washington, 124 S. Ct. 2531

(2004), or United States v. Booker, 125 S. Ct. 738 (2005), as Mr. Pittman’s sentence

was mandated by statute. See United States v. Alvarado-Rivera, 412 F.3d 942, 946

n.3 (8th Cir. 2005) (defendant’s Sixth Amendment rights not violated where

defendant admitted responsibility for drug quantity); United States v. Bolanos,

409 F.3d 1045, 1049 (8th Cir. 2005) (no Blakely error where sentence was based on

statutory mandatory minimum rather than use of Guidelines); United States v.

Thomas, 398 F.3d 1058, 1064 (8th Cir. 2005) (prior felony conviction used to

increase statutory minimum penalties does not implicate Blakely).

Having reviewed the record independently under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75

(1988), we have found no other nonfrivolous issues. Accordingly, we affirm the

sentence and grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

______________________________
#### William C. Hurt, as Ancillary Executor of William H. Hurt, Deceased, Appellant, *v.*Abraham P. Miller et al., Composing the Firm of Miller & Company, Respondents.

*Hurt*v. *Miller,*130 App. Div. 833, affirmed.

(Argued December 12, 1907;

decided January 7, 1908.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered October 1, 1907, which reversed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict directed by the court in an action to recover for the alleged wrongful sale by defendants, a firm of stockbrokers, of a contract for a number of bales of cotton bought by them for plaintiff’s testator.

*G. A. Mountjoy*and *William King Hall*for appellant.

*Charles E. Pushrnore*for respondents.

Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered against appellant on the stipulation, with costs in all courts; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Hiscook, JJ.
# C_2010081DE.01000101.xml

| 29.3.2010 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | C 81/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.3.2010

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

C 81/1

---

PROTOKOLL ÜBER DIE BERICHTIGUNG

des Vertrags von Lissabon zur Änderung des Vertrags über die Europäische Union und des Vertrags zur Gründung der Europäischen Gemeinschaft, unterzeichnet in Lissabon am 13. Dezember 2007

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union C 306 vom 17. Dezember 2007
  )

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union C 306 vom 17. Dezember 2007

2010/C 81/01

Diese Berichtigung wurde mit einem Berichtigungsprotokoll vorgenommen, das am 23. März 2010 in Rom unterzeichnet wurde und dessen Verwahrer die Regierung der Italienischen Republik ist.

Protokolle, die dem Vertrag von Lissabon beizufügen sind

Protokoll Nr. 1

Seite 180, Artikel 1 Nummer 14

Folgender Buchstabe wird nach dem Buchstaben f eingefügt:

| „f a) | In Artikel 20, der Artikel 19 wird, wird der Satzteil ‚auf die Mitglieder der Kommission‘ ersetzt durch ‚auf den Präsidenten des Europäischen Rates‘. Es wird folgender Absatz angefügt:
  ‚Sie finden auch auf die Mitglieder der Kommission Anwendung.‘ “ |
| --- | --- |

„f a)

In Artikel 20, der Artikel 19 wird, wird der Satzteil ‚auf die Mitglieder der Kommission‘ ersetzt durch ‚auf den Präsidenten des Europäischen Rates‘. Es wird folgender Absatz angefügt:

‚Sie finden auch auf die Mitglieder der Kommission Anwendung.‘ “

---
#### § 218.4 Proposed projects and activities not subject to objection.

Proposed projects and activities are not subject to objection when no timely, specific written comments regarding the proposed project or activity (see § 218.2) are received during any designated opportunity for public comment (see § 218.5(a)). The responsible official must issue a statement in the Record of Decision or Decision Notice that the project or activity was not subject to objection.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Trade Commission

# AGENCY:

Federal Trade Commission.

# Time and Date:

2 p.m., Wednesday, November 15, 2006.

# Place:

Federal Trade Commission Building, Room 532, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20580.

# Status:

Part of this meeting will be open to the public. The rest of the meeting will be closed to the public.

# Matters to Be Considered:

Portion Open to the Public:

(1) Oral Argument in Rambus Incorporated, Docket 9302.

Portion Closed to the Public:

(2) Executive Session to follow Oral Argument in Rambus Incorporated, Docket 9302.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mitch Katz, Office of Public Affairs: (202) 326-2180. Recorded Message: (202) 326-2711.

Donald S. Clark,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 06-8783 Filed 10-16-06; 1:01 pm]

BILLING CODE 6750-01-M
<PAGE>
                                                       Exhibit 21


                           SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

Note:  Unless otherwise noted, the Registrant owns 100% of the equity interest
in each of the subsidiaries.

Incorporated or organized in Minnesota
--------------------------------------
RCC Atlantic, Inc.
RCC Atlantic Long Distance, Inc.
RCC Minnesota, Inc.
RCC Network, Inc.
RCC Paging, Inc.
Wireless Alliance, LLC (Registrant has a 51% interest in this entity)
TLA Spectrum, LLC 5
RGI Group, Inc.
Revering Finance Corporation, wholly-owned subsidiary of RGI Group, Inc.

Incorporated in Maine
---------------------
MRCC, Inc.
Western Maine Cellular, Inc., wholly-owned subsidiary of MRCC, Inc.
#### § 84.10 What is the purpose and scope of this rule?

The regulations in this part establish the requirements for coastal State participation in the National Coastal Wetlands Conservation Grant Program authorized by Section 305 of the Coastal Wetlands Planning, Protection and Restoration Act (Pub L. 101-646, title III; 16 U.S.C. 3954). The primary goal of the National Coastal Wetlands Conservation Grant Program is the long-term conservation of coastal wetlands ecosystems. It accomplishes this by helping States protect, restore, and enhance their coastal habitats through a competitive grants program. Results are measured in acres protected, restored, and enhanced.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 690 

To direct the Federal Communications Commission to evaluate and consider 

the impact of the telecommunications network equipment supply chain 

on the deployment of universal service, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 7, 2023 

Mr. HICKENLOOPER (for himself, Mr. MORAN, Mr. TESTER, and Mrs. CAPITO) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To direct the Federal Communications Commission to evaluate and consider the impact of the telecommunications 

network equipment supply chain on the deployment of 

universal service, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Network Equipment 

5 Transparency Act’’ or the ‘‘NET Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 690 IS

1 SEC. 2. TELECOMMUNICATIONS SUPPLY CHAIN CONSIDER2 ATION. 

3 Section 13 of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 

4 U.S.C. 163) is amended— 

5 (1) by redesignating subsection (d) as sub6 section (e); and 

7 (2) by inserting after subsection (c) the fol8 lowing: 

9 ‘‘(d) STATUS OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS SUPPLY

10 CHAIN.—In each report required by subsection (a), the 

11 Commission shall, to the extent that data is available, de12 termine whether a lack of network equipment significantly 

13 impacted the deployment of advanced telecommunications 

14 capability during the applicable reporting period.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
From: Ed Barry [mailto:edward.barry@lhoist.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2014 11:01 AM

To: McKaughan, Colleen

Cc: Herbert Verville

Subject: FW: Revised Spreadsheet

Hello Colleen,

Attached is a spreadsheet with the requested information. LNA is fine with you releasing this as public 

information. Should you need anything else, just let me know. We did remove the production 

information from the spreadsheet.

Any questions, just let me know. You can each me on my cell or email.

Also, any surprises surfacing from the last time we talked?

Thanks, Ed

Ed Barry

Western Environmental Manager

Lhoist North America

Office 480-368-4239

Cell 602-321-6752

From: Herbert Verville 

Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2014 10:42 AM

To: Ed Barry

Subject: Revised Spreadsheet

Double checked – all numbers match with what was sent previously.

Herbert J. Verville

Herbert J. Verville

Environmental Manager

Direct: 928-769-2271 Ext. 645104 

Cell: 928-848-6357

Fax: 928-769-2305 

E-mail: Herbert.Verville@Lhoist.com

Lhoist North America - Nelson Plant

P.O. Box 370

Peach Springs, AZ 86434

www.Lhoist.us.com

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message from Lhoist North America is intended only for the named recipients. It contains 

information that may be confidential, privileged, attorney work product, or otherwise exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you have 

received this message in error, are not a named recipient, or are not the employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to a named 

recipient, be advised that any review, disclosure, use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this message or its contents is strictly 

prohibited. Please notify the sender above immediately if you have received this message in error, and delete the message. Thank you.
§ 1012.1 What does this part cover? ( a ) This part describes how the Presidio Trust responds to requests or subpoenas for: ( 1 ) Testimony by employees in State, territorial or Tribal judicial, legislative or administrative proceedings concerning information acquired while performing official duties or because of an employee's official status;
( 2 ) Testimony by employees in Federal court civil proceedings in which the United States or the Presidio Trust is not a party concerning information acquired while performing official duties or because of an employee's official status;
( 3 ) Testimony by employees in any judicial or administrative proceeding in which the United States or the Presidio Trust, while not a party, has a direct and substantial interest;
( 4 ) Official records or certification of such records for use in Federal, State, territorial or Tribal judicial, legislative or administrative proceedings.
( b ) In this part, “employee” means a current or former Presidio Trust employee, or Board member, including a contractor or special government employee, except as the Presidio Trust may otherwise determine in a particular case.
( c ) This part does not apply to: ( 1 ) Congressional requests or subpoenas for testimony or records;
( 2 ) Federal court civil proceedings in which the United States or the Presidio Trust is a party;
( 3 ) Federal administrative proceedings;
( 4 ) Federal, State and Tribal criminal court proceedings;
( 5 ) Employees who voluntarily testify, while on their own time or in approved leave status, as private citizens as to facts or events that are not related to the official business of the Presidio Trust. The employee must state for the record that the testimony represents the employee's own views and is not necessarily the official position of the Presidio Trust. See 5 CFR 2635.702(b), 2635.807(b).
( 6 ) Testimony by employees as expert witnesses on subjects outside their official duties, except that they must obtain prior approval if required by § 1012.11.
( d ) This part does not affect the rights of any individual or the procedures for obtaining records under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), Privacy Act, or statutes governing the certification of official records. The Presidio Trust FOIA and Privacy Act regulations are found at parts 1007 and 1008 of this chapter.
( e ) Nothing in this part is intended to impede the appropriate disclosure under applicable laws of Presidio Trust information to Federal, State, territorial, Tribal, or foreign law enforcement, prosecutorial, or regulatory agencies.
( f ) This part only provides guidance for the internal operations of the Presidio Trust, and neither creates nor is intended to create any enforceable right or benefit against the United States or the Presidio Trust.
# EUR-Lex - 12006E037 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12006E037

**Treaty establishing the European Community (consolidated version) - Part Three - Community policies - TITLE II - Agriculture - Article 37 **

*
Official Journal C 321 E , 29/12/2006 P. 0056 - 0056 Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0050 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0192 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0018 - Consolidated version (EEC Treaty - no official publication available) *

Article 37

1. In order to evolve the broad lines of a common agricultural policy, the Commission shall, immediately this Treaty enters into force, convene a conference of the Member States with a view to making a comparison of their agricultural policies, in particular by producing a statement of their resources and needs.

2. Having taken into account the work of the Conference provided for in paragraph 1, after consulting the Economic and Social Committee and within two years of the entry into force of this Treaty, the Commission shall submit proposals for working out and implementing the common agricultural policy, including the replacement of the national organisations by one of the forms of common organisation provided for in Article 34(1), and for implementing the measures specified in this title.

These proposals shall take account of the interdependence of the agricultural matters mentioned in this title.

The Council shall, on a proposal from the Commission and after consulting the European Parliament, acting by a qualified majority, make regulations, issue directives, or take decisions, without prejudice to any recommendations it may also make.

3. The Council may, acting by a qualified majority and in accordance with paragraph 2, replace the national market organisations by the common organisation provided for in Article 34(1) if:

(a) the common organisation offers Member States which are opposed to this measure and which have an organisation of their own for the production in question equivalent safeguards for the employment and standard of living of the producers concerned, account being taken of the adjustments that will be possible and the specialisation that will be needed with the passage of time;

(b) such an organisation ensures conditions for trade within the Community similar to those existing in a national market.

4. If a common organisation for certain raw materials is established before a common organisation exists for the corresponding processed products, such raw materials as are used for processed products intended for export to third countries may be imported from outside the Community.

--------------------------------------------------
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 5284] 

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                         *et seq.*; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                         *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236 of October 19, 1999, as amended, and Delegation of Authority No. 257 of April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875], I hereby determine that the objects to be included in the exhibition “Life in the Pacific of the 1700s: The Cook/Forster Collection of the George August University of Gottingen,” imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to a loan agreement with the foreign owner or custodian. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the Honolulu Academy of Arts, Honolulu, HI, from on or about February 23, 2006, until on or about May 14, 2006, and at possible additional venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. Public Notice of these Determinations is ordered to be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For further information, including a list of the exhibit objects, contact Julianne Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202/453-8049). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th Street, SW., Room 700, Washington, DC 20547-0001. 

Dated: January 23, 2006. 

C. Miller Crouch, 

Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State. 

[FR Doc. 06-842 Filed 1-26-06; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
#### § 51.89 What happens if there is a default on an encumbrance approved by the Director?

In the event of default on an encumbrance approved by the Director in accordance with this part, the creditor, or an assignee of the creditor, may succeed to the interests of the concessioner only to the extent provided by the approved encumbrance, this part and the terms and conditions of the applicable concession contract.