alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EUR-Lex - 12008M054 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008M054

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on European Union - TITLE VI: FINAL PROVISIONS - Article 54 (ex Article 52 TEU) **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0044 - 0045 *

Article 54

(ex Article 52 TEU)

1. This Treaty shall be ratified by the High Contracting Parties in accordance with their respective constitutional requirements. The instruments of ratification shall be deposited with the Government of the Italian Republic.

2. This Treaty shall enter into force on 1 January 1993, provided that all the Instruments of ratification have been deposited, or, failing that, on the first day of the month following the deposit of the Instrument of ratification by the last signatory State to take this step.

--------------------------------------------------
# EUR-Lex - 12008E/AFI/DCL/13 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008E/AFI/DCL/13

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - DECLARATIONS annexed to the Final Act of the Intergovernmental Conference which adopted the Treaty of Lisbon, signed on 13 December 2007 - A. DECLARATIONS CONCERNING PROVISIONS OF THE TREATIES - 13. Declaration concerning the common foreign and security policy **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0343 - 0343 *

13. Declaration concerning the common foreign and security policy

The Conference underlines that the provisions in the Treaty on European Union covering the Common Foreign and Security Policy, including the creation of the office of High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy and the establishment of an External Action Service, do not affect the responsibilities of the Member States, as they currently exist, for the formulation and conduct of their foreign policy nor of their national representation in third countries and international organisations.

The Conference also recalls that the provisions governing the Common Security and Defence Policy do not prejudice the specific character of the security and defence policy of the Member States.

It stresses that the European Union and its Member States will remain bound by the provisions of the Charter of the United Nations and, in particular, by the primary responsibility of the Security Council and of its Members for the maintenance of international peace and security.

--------------------------------------------------
Endpoint study record: Boiling point (OPPTS 830.7220) -

PSL 2012 

Administrative Data 

Data source 

Reference 

Data access 

Data protection claimed 

Materials and methods 

Test guideline 

Type of method 

GLP compliance 

Test materials 

Identity of test material same as for substance defined in section 1 (if not read-across) 

UUID IUC5-f59cee5e-8108-401e-9249-b4f52e35324f 

Dossier UUID 0 

Author mbogle / Vertellus Specialties Inc.

Date 2012-05-31 10:52:34 EDT 

Remarks 

 

Purpose flag key study; robust study summary; used for classification; used for MSDS 

Study result type experimental result Study period 16 March 2012 - 20 March 2012 

Reliability 1 (reliable without restriction) 

Reference 

type 

Author Year Title Bibliographic 

source 

Testing 

laboratory 

Report 

no. 

Owner 

company 

Company 

study no. 

Report 

date 

study 

report 

Wo, C. 2012 Oxidized Castor 

Oil (aka: Pale 

16, Material # 

104495): 

Physical and 

Chemical 

Characteristics: 

Boiling Point 

 Eurofins 

PSL, 

Dayton, NJ 

USA 

34088 Vertellus 

Specialties 

Inc. 

 

data submitter is data owner 

yes, but willing to share 

Qualifier Guideline Deviations 

according to EPA OPPTS 830.7220 (Boiling Point / Boiling Range) no 

according to OECD Guideline 103 (Boiling point/boiling range) no 

distillation method 

yes 

yes 

Endpoint study record: Boiling point (OPPTS 830.7220) - PSL 2012 Page 1 of 2

file://G:\TSCA\Test Rule - Oxidized Castor Oil\Robust Study Summaries\Boiling Point.html 5/31/2012
Test material identity 

Details on test material 

Results and discussions 

Boiling point 

Overall remarks, attachments 

Overall remarks 

Attached full study report 

Applicant's summary and conclusion 

Conclusions 

Identifier Identity 

CAS name Castor Oil, Oxidized 

CAS number 68187-84-8 

- Name of test material (as cited in study report): Oxidized Castor Oil (aka: Pale 16, Material # 104495) 

- Physical state: Clear, yellow-amber liquid with a mild odor 

- Analytical purity: 100% 

- Lot/batch No.: 0000113649 

- Expiration date of the lot/batch: June 30, 2012 

- Storage condition of test material: room temperature 

Boiling pt. Atm. pressure Decomposition Decomp. temp. Remarks 

102 °C >= 765 — <= 770 mm Hg no 

116 °C >= 765 — <= 770 mm Hg no 

218 °C >= 765 — <= 770 mm Hg no 

The appearance of three distinct boiling points is likely due to differing degrees 

of oxidation on the triglycerides making up castor oil. 

Attached full study report 

Oxidized Castor Oil - Boiling Point (Eurofins PSL 2012).pdf / 401.04 KB (application/pdf) 

Oxidized Castor Oil was found to have three boiling points: 102°C, 116°C and 218°C. 

Endpoint study record: Boiling point (OPPTS 830.7220) - PSL 2012 Page 2 of 2

file://G:\TSCA\Test Rule - Oxidized Castor Oil\Robust Study Summaries\Boiling Point.html 5/31/2012
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 5577] 

The Secretary of State, pursuant to the Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act for Defense, the Global War on Terror, and Tsunami Relief (P.L. 109-13) and the President's delegation of his authority to make the necessary determination on the use of these funds, determined on September 9th that the use of the $30 million in FY 2005 supplemental peacekeeping operations funds in Lebanon and Kyrgyz Republic will support the global war on terrorism. 

Dated: September 29, 2006. 

Michael W. Coulter, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary , Bureau of Political-Military Affairs, Department of State.

      ( print page 59848)          ( print page 59849)    

BILLING CODE 4710-27-P

[FR Doc. 06-8609 Filed 10-10-06; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4710-27-C
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.3


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER
     PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(b) OR RULE 15D-14(b) AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


         In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A, Amendment No. 1 of
The Meridian Resource Corporation (the "Company") for the year ended December
31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Form 10-K"), I, Lloyd V. DeLano, Chief Accounting Officer of the
Company, certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



     1.   The Form 10-K/A, Amendment No. 1 fully complies with the requirements
          of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


     2.   The information contained in the Form 10-K/A, Amendment No. 1 fairly
          presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
          results of operations of the Company.


Date:  April 29, 2004



                                                     /s/ Lloyd V. DeLano
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Lloyd V. DeLano
                                                     Chief Accounting Officer


                                      -32-
§ 61.7 Subgrants to certified local governments. ( a ) Each SHPO must transfer at least 10 percent of its annual Historic Preservation Fund (HPF) grant award to CLGs as subgrants for historic preservation projects and programs in accordance with the Act. In any year that the annual HPF State grant appropriation exceeds $65,000,000, SHPOs must transfer one half of the amount over $65,000,000 to CLGs according to procedures that the Secretary will establish.
( b ) Each CLG is eligible to receive funds from the 10 percent (or greater) CLG share of the State's total annual HPF grant award. However, the SHPO need not award funds to all CLGs.
( c ) Each SHPO must maintain and follow a procedure that the Secretary approves for the use and distribution of funds from the State's annual HPF grant award to CLGs to ensure that no CLG receives a disproportionate share of the allocation. The procedure will provide a clear basis for the funding decisions. The SHPO must submit any proposed amendment to its procedure to the Secretary for approval. The Secretary will respond to such a proposal in a timely fashion generally within 45 days of receipt.
( d ) Each SHPO must notify annually each CLG of its opportunity to apply for HPF funding as well as what is entailed in the application and project selection process.
( e ) Each CLG receiving an HPF grant award from the CLG share is a subgrantee of the State. The SHPO must ensure that each CLG adheres to all applicable grant conditions and government-wide and program specific requirements that the National Park Service issues. The SHPO may require specific uses of funds subgranted to CLGs. CLGs may not apply subgranted HPF monies as matching share for any other Federal grant.
( f ) Where there is no approved State program pursuant to § 61.4, the Secretary will determine the method for allocating funds to CLGs in that State in accordance with the procedures set forth for the State in this section. To the extent feasible, the Secretary will ensure consistency and continuity in the funding allocation policy of the CLG program for a State that does not have an approved historic preservation program.
EXHIBIT 32.2 SECTION
1350 CERTIFICATION Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, I, Jane Morlok,
Chief Financial Officer and Co-Chief Executive Officer of Breda Telephone
Corp., certify that to my knowledge (i) Breda Telephone Corp.s Quarterly
Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 (the Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Breda Telephone Corp. Date: November 14, 2005. /s/ Jane MorlokJane Morlok, Chief
  Financial Officer
  and Co-Chief Executive Officer E-4
Exhibit 8.17**THIRD AMENDMENT TO MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT**THIS THIRD AMENDMENT TO MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT effective September 1, 2001 amends thatcertain Management Agreement dated as of December 1, 1997, between Retama Development Corporationhaving an office at 1 Retama Parkway, Selma, Texas 78154 (“Owner”), Retama Partners, Ltd. having anoffice at 1964 South Alamo, San Antonio, Texas 78204 (“License Holder”), and Retama EntertainmentGroup, Inc., a Texas Limited Liability Corporation, having an office at 1 Retama Parkway, Selma,Texas 78154 (“Operator”).The Management Agreement is hereby amended as follows:     1. Section 4 of the Second Amendment to Management Agreement shall be deleted.     2. Section 6.2 of the Agreement shall be deleted and replaced with the following:     “6.2 The annual Variable Management Fee shall be in the amount of three-tenths of one percent       (.3%) of total Handle of the Racetrack in excess of $100,000,000; provided, however, that the       amount payable for the Variable Management Fee for any year shall not exceed 25% of total        FixedManagement Fees.”All other provisions of the Management Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be executed as of the dayand year above written.         OWNER:         **RETAMA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION**           By:      Name:      Title:           OPERATOR:         **RETAMA ENTERTAINMENT GROUP**           By:      Name:      Title:
# EUR-Lex - 12003T054 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12003T054

**Act concerning the conditions of accession of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia and the Slovak Republic and the adjustments to the Treaties on which the European Union is founded - Part five : Provisions relating to the implementation of this Act - Title II : Applicability of the Acts of the Institutions - Article 54 **

*
Official Journal L 236 , 23/09/2003 P. 0048 - 0048 *

Article 54

The new Member States shall put into effect the measures necessary for them to comply, from the date of accession, with the provisions of directives and decisions within the meaning of Article 249 of the EC Treaty and of Article 161 of the Euratom Treaty, unless another time-limit is provided for in the Annexes referred to in Article 24 or in any other provisions of this Act or its Annexes.

--------------------------------------------------
EXHIBIT 32.1





Certification of Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer of XTO Energy Inc.

(Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)



In connection with the Annual Report of XTO
Energy Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Bob R. Simpson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and
Louis G. Baldwin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|                                                    
|/S/ BOB R. SIMPSON                                  
|Bob R. Simpson Chief Executive Officer March 7, 2005



|                                                      
|------------------------------------------------------
|                                                      
|/S/ LOUIS G. BALDWIN                                  
|Louis G. Baldwin Chief Financial Officer March 7, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                         174,599
<SECURITIES>                                 5,253,673
<RECEIVABLES>                                   30,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,447,763
<PP&E>                                           2,581
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,700
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,318,347
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,643
<BONDS>                                        700,324
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     5,882,941
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,318,347
<SALES>                                      6,218,399
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,218,399
<CGS>                                        7,108,403
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,108,403
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (644,470)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (510,427)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (510,071)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.06)



</TABLE>
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-13-00074-CV

CIT PARTNERS, LLC, Appellant

V.

JOHNSON CAPITAL GROUP, INC., Appellee

On Appeal from the 159th District Court

Angelina County, Texas

Trial Court No. CV-00619-11-06

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, CIT Partners, LLC, has filed a motion to dismiss the pending appeal in this 

matter.1

 Appellant represents that the parties have reached a full and final settlement and that 

appellant no longer desires to prosecute this appeal.

We grant appellant’s motion and dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1).

PER CURIAM

Date Submitted: November 26, 2013

Date Decided: November 27, 2013

 1

Originally appealed to the Twelfth Court of Appeals, this case was transferred to this Court by the Texas Supreme 

Court pursuant to its docket equalization efforts. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 73.001 (West 2013). We are 

unaware of any conflict between precedent of the Twelfth Court of Appeals and that of this Court on any relevant 

issue. See TEX. R. APP. P. 41.3.
Exhibit 13.02

CFO CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

In
connection with the Annual Report of Koninklijke Ahold N.V. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended January 3, 2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the
undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 2, 2016

/s/ Jeff Carr

Name: Jeff Carr

Title: Chief Financial Officer
# EUR-Lex - 12006E309 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12006E309

**Treaty establishing the European Community (consolidated version) - Part Six - General and final provisions - Article 309 **

*
Official Journal C 321 E , 29/12/2006 P. 0179 - 0179 Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0153 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0301 - Consolidated version *

Article 309

1. Where a decision has been taken to suspend the voting rights of the representative of the government of a Member State in accordance with Article 7(3) of the Treaty on European Union, these voting rights shall also be suspended with regard to this Treaty.

2. Moreover, where the existence of a serious and persistent breach by a Member State of principles mentioned in Article 6(1) of the Treaty on European Union has been determined in accordance with Article 7(2) of that Treaty, the Council, acting by a qualified majority, may decide to suspend certain of the rights deriving from the application of this Treaty to the Member State in question. In doing so, the Council shall take into account the possible consequences of such a suspension on the rights and obligations of natural and legal persons.

The obligations of the Member State in question under this Treaty shall in any case continue to be binding on that State.

3. The Council, acting by a qualified majority, may decide subsequently to vary or revoke measures taken in accordance with paragraph 2 in response to changes in the situation which led to their being imposed.

4. When taking decisions referred to in paragraphs 2 and 3, the Council shall act without taking into account the votes of the representative of the government of the Member State in question. By way of derogation from Article 205(2) a qualified majority shall be defined as the same proportion of the weighted votes of the members of the Council concerned as laid down in Article 205(2).

This paragraph shall also apply in the event of voting rights being suspended in accordance with paragraph 1. In such cases, a decision requiring unanimity shall be taken without the vote of the representative of the government of the Member State in question.

--------------------------------------------------
FY 2024 CTAS Application Timeline(s) Template

# FY 2024 CTAS Application Timeline(s) Template

Tribe Name: 

Applicants are strongly encouraged to use this template to develop a detailed timeline for each purpose area under which they are requesting funding. Each purpose area timeline should encompass the entire period of performance for the proposed project and should outline goals, objectives, major activities/tasks, responsibility (person/position/team) for completion, and estimated start and completion for each entry. Estimated start and completion should be entered by month (not calendar dates). If awarded, it is expected that applicants will update the purpose area timeline(s) as appropriate when changes occur. **Note: There is no page limit restriction and applicants can take as much space as needed to create an effective timeline. Additional lines can be added to the timeline by using the “tab” keyboard function.*

Example Month Entry for Timeline

Year 1: Months 1–12 | Year 2: Months 13–24 | Year 3: Months 25–36 | Year 4: Months 37–48 | Year 5: Months 49–60

## Purpose Area 1

## Purpose Area 2

## Purpose Area 3

## Purpose Area 4

## Purpose Area 6

## Purpose Area 8

## Purpose Area 9

FY 2024page 2