alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT 32.1


                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

I, Tsan-Kun Wu - President and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive
officer) of Eupa International Corporation (the "Registrant"), certifies that to
the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form
10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004 of the Registrant (the "Report"):

        (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

        (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.


        /s/ Tsan-Kun Wu
        ----------------------------
        Name:  Tsan-Kun Wu
        Date:  May 14, 2004


                                       13
§ 63.6 Review and nomination of properties determined eligible. The Keeper of the National Register will conduct an annual review of the condition of properties determined eligible for the National Register. The Keeper of the National Register will obtain from the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation information on decisions made concerning eligible properties in accord with memorandum of agreement under the Council's “Procedures for the Protection of Historic and Cultural Properties” (36 CFR part 800). If there is no memorandum of agreement or if no provision has been made in a memorandum of agreement for nomination of an eligible property and if the property retains the characteristics that made it eligible for the National Register, the Keeper of the National Register will take the following steps: ( a ) For a property owned by a Federal agency, or under the jurisdiction or control of the agency to the extent that the agency substantially exercises the attributes of ownership, the Keeper of the National Register will request the Federal agency to nominate the property to the National Register within six months.
( b ) If the property is not under Federal jurisdiction or control, the Keeper of the National Register will request that the State Historic Preservation Office nominate the property to the National Register within six months.
( c ) If the Keeper of the National Register determines that a property has lost the characteristics that made it eligible for the National Register, he will inform the State Historic Preservation Officer and the Federal agency and remove the property from the list of eligible properties.
#### § 262.4 Audit of expenditures.

The Chief of the Forest Service shall, through appropriate directives to agency personnel, assure the accountability of all funds spent in carrying out the provisions of this subpart and safeguard the identity of those wishing to remain anonymous.

[48 FR 26605, June 9, 1983]
§ 216.1 Purpose and scope. ( a ) This part sets forth the process that the Forest Service will use to ensure adequate notice and an opportunity for comment from the public, Tribal, State and local governments, and other Federal agencies with respect to the formulation in Forest Service directives of standards, criteria, and guidelines applicable to Forest Service programs. Nothing in this Part restricts the Forest Service from providing additional public participation opportunities, including public hearings, where appropriate.
( b ) This part applies to the formulation in Forest Service directives of standards, criteria, and guidelines applicable to Forest Service programs. This part does not apply to Forest Service directives pertaining to law enforcement and investigations; personnel matters; procurement; administrative support activities such as budget and finance; business operations; and activities undertaken by the Forest Service on behalf of other Federal agencies. To the extent that any other part in this chapter of the Code of Federal Regulations requires greater opportunities for the public to participate with respect to policymaking or the issuance of directives than are required by this part, the other Part shall be controlling.
§ 251.112 Application requirements. ( a ) A landowner shall apply for access across National Forest System lands in accordance with the application requirements of § 251.54 of this part. Such application shall specifically include a statement of the intended mode of access to, and uses of, the non-Federal land for which the special-use authorization is requested.
( b ) The application shall disclose the historic access to the landowner's property and any rights of access which may exist over non-federally owned land and shall provide reasons why these means of access do not provide adequate access to the landowners property.
( c ) The information required to apply for access across National Forest lands under this subpart is approved for use under subpart B of this part and assigned OMB control number 0596-0082.
§ 254.12 Value equalization; cash equalization waiver. ( a ) To equalize the agreed upon values of the Federal and non-Federal lands involved in an exchange, either with or without adjustments of relative values as compensation for various costs, the parties to an exchange may agree to: ( 1 ) Modify the exchange proposal by adding or excluding lands; and/or
( 2 ) Use cash equalization, after making all reasonable efforts to equalize values by adding or deleting lands.
( b ) The combined amount of any cash equalization payment and/or the amount of adjustments agreed to as compensation for costs under § 254.7 of this subpart may not exceed 25 percent of the value of the Federal lands to be conveyed.
( c ) The Secretary of Agriculture may not waive cash equalization payment due the United States, but the parties may agree to waive cash equalization payment due the non-Federal party. The amount to be waived may not exceed 3 percent of the value of the lands being exchanged out of Federal ownership or $15,000, whichever is less.
( d ) A cash equalization payment may be waived only after the authorized officer certifies, in writing, that the waiver will expedite the exchange and that the public interest will be best served by the waiver.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-6876

RANDY RHYNE, 

 Petitioner - Appellant, 

 v. 

WARDEN, TYGER RIVER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, 

 Respondent - Appellee. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Florence. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District 

Judge. (4:07-cv-03147-HMH) 

Submitted: October 29, 2008 Decided: November 17, 2008 

Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Randy Rhyne, Appellant Pro Se. Melody Jane Brown, Assistant 

Attorney General, Donald John Zelenka, Deputy Assistant Attorney 

General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
PER CURIAM: 

Randy Rhyne seeks to appeal the district court’s order 

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying 

relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The order is 

not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a 

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A 

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this 

standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find 

that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district 

court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural 

ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. 

Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. 

McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 

683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the 

record and conclude that Rhyne has not made the requisite 

showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability 

and dismiss the appeal. We also deny Rhyne’s motions for a 

transcript, for appointment of counsel, and to appoint an 

investigator. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

2 
3 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process. 

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002



(18 U.S.C. 1350)



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of (18 U.S.C.
1350), the undersigned officer of Elephant Talk Communications Corp., a California corporation (the “Company”), does
hereby certify, to the best of such officer’s knowledge and belief, that:



(1)           The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012 (the “Form 10-Q”) of the Company fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)           The
information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all materials respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|Date:  August 1, 2012 | /s/ Steven van der Velden                                    | 
|--------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------ | 
|                      | Steven van der Velden, President and Chief
Executive Officer | 



This certification shall not be deemed “filed” for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certification
will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Securities Exchange Act.
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

WASHINGTON, D C. 2046T 

CERTIFIED MAIL 

RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED 

Melanie Sloan KTr 9 9 9niit 

Nicholas Mezlak CL OiZi 

Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington 

455 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W. 

Sixth Floor 

Washington, D.C. 20001 

RE: MUR 6696 

Crossroads Grassroots Policy Strategies 

Steven Law 

Karl Rove 

Haley Barbour 

Caleb Crosby 

Dear Ms. Sloan and Mr. Mezlak: 

The Federal Election Commission has considered the allegations contained in your 

amended complaint dated April 24, 2013, but was equally divided on whether to approve the 

Office of General Counsel's recommendations to find no reason to believe that Crossroads 

Grassroots Policy Strategies ("Crossroads GPS") violated 52 U.S.C. § 30104(c)(2) and 11 C.F.R. 

§ 109.10(e)(l)(vi) and dismiss the allegation that Crossroads GPS violated 52 U.S.C. 

§ 30104(c)(1). Accordingly, on December 17, 2015, the Commission closed the file in this 

matter. 

Documents related to the case will be placed on the public record within 30 days. See 

Statement of Policy Regarding Disclosure of Closed Enforcement and Related Files, 

68 Fed. Reg. 70426 (Dec. 18,2003) and Statement of Policy Regarding Placing First General 

Counsel's Reports on the Public Record, 74 Fed. Reg. 66132 (Dec. 14, 2009). 

The Federal Election Campaign Act allows a complainant to seek judicial review of the 

Contunission's dismissal of this action. See 52 U.S.C. § 30109(a)(8) If you have any questions, 

please contact Jin Lee, the attorney assigned to this matter, at (202) 694-1650. 

Sincerdy, %L1UUL_ 

Mark Shonkwiler 

Assistant General Counsel
Date of 

report 

1970 

July 17 

&tuutt nf tqr luitrb jtutrs 

NINETY-FIRST CONGRESS 

F S {Convened January 3, 1969 

IRST ESSION Ad" d D b 23 1969 JOurne ecem er , 

S S { Convened January 19, 1970 

ECOND ESSION 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Prepared under the direction of FRANCIS R. V ALEO, Secretary of the Senate 

By GERALD A. HACKETT, Exerutive Clerk 

Monday, July 20, 1970 

NOMINATION 

Calendar Message Name of nommee Office Predecessor 

No. No. 

ATOMIC ENERGY 

COMMISSION 

115 196 Glenn T S<.>aborg, of Cali- A member of the Atomic Reappointment. 

fornia Energy Commission for 

a term of 5 years expmng June 30, 1975. 

48-022--70--No.198 

U S ~OVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1970
Case 16-25921 Doc 12 Filed 08/18/16 Entered 08/19/16 09:14:23 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
#### § 223.40 Cancellation for environmental protection or inconsistency with plans.

Timber sale contracts, permits, and other such instruments, authorizing the harvesting of trees or other forest products, with terms of longer than 2 years, shall provide for cancellation in order to prevent serious environmental damage or when they are significantly inconsistent with land management plans adopted or revised in accordance with section 6 of the Forest and Rangeland Renewable Resources Planning Act of 1974, as amended. Such provision shall provide for reasonable compensation to the purchaser for unrecovered costs incurred under the contract and for the difference between the current contract value and the average value of comparable National Forest timber sold during the preceding 6-month period.
# EUR-Lex - 12008E028 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008E028

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - PART THREE: UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS - TITLE II: FREE MOVEMENT OF GOODS - Article 28 (ex Article 23 TEC) **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0059 - 0060 *

Article 28

(ex Article 23 TEC)

1. The Union shall comprise a customs union which shall cover all trade in goods and which shall involve the prohibition between Member States of customs duties on imports and exports and of all charges having equivalent effect, and the adoption of a common customs tariff in their relations with third countries.

2. The provisions of Article 30 and of Chapter 2 of this Title shall apply to products originating in Member States and to products coming from third countries which are in free circulation in Member States.

--------------------------------------------------
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0030

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL WELCH,

Defendant and Appellant. 

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including February 6, 2023, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 27 2022

12/27/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0030
#### § 218.30 Applicability and scope.

This subpart includes provisions that are specific to proposed hazardous fuel reduction projects documented with a Record of Decision or Decision Notice, and authorized under the Healthy Forests Restoration Act (HFRA). The sections of this subpart must be considered in combination with the general provisions of subpart A of this part for the full complement of regulatory direction pertaining to predecisional administrative review of the applicable projects and activities.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

GERARDO GARCIA-ANTONIO,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 09-10084

D.C. No. 2:08-CR-01208-MHM

District of Arizona, 

Phoenix

ORDER

Before: B. FLETCHER, CLIFTON, and BEA, Circuit Judges 

Counsel for appellant has filed a brief stating that he finds no meritorious

issues for review and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record pursuant to Anders

v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). No pro se supplemental brief or answering

brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record, see Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83-

84 (1988), discloses the following potentially arguable issue for direct appeal: 

Does Garcia-Antonio’s prior conviction under California Penal Code section

288(c) qualify as a crime of violence warranting a sixteen-level increase under

U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii)? See United States v. Castro, 607 F.3d 566, 567 (9th

Cir. 2010), which was filed after briefing was completed.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is denied.

FILED

APR 11 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-10084

The Anders brief filed December 21, 2009 is stricken. Counsel may brief

any issues deemed appropriate, but in particular shall address the issue identified

above. Appellant’s replacement opening brief and any supplement to the excerpts

of record filed December 23, 2009 are due June 6, 2011; appellee’s brief is due

July 6, 2011; the optional reply brief is due within 14 days after service of

appellee’s brief. 

The clerk shall serve a copy of this order on appellant personally, as well as

on appellee James Knapp, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Two

Renaissance Square, 40 N. Central Ave. Ste. 1200, Phoenix, Arizona 85004-4408.

This panel does not retain jurisdiction over the appeal.
§ 1211.445 Marital or parental status. ( a ) *Status generally.* A recipient shall not apply any rule concerning a student's actual or potential parental, family, or marital status that treats students differently on the basis of sex.
( b ) *Pregnancy and related conditions.* ( 1 ) A recipient shall not discriminate against any student, or exclude any student from its education program or activity, including any class or extracurricular activity, on the basis of such student's pregnancy, childbirth, false pregnancy, termination of pregnancy, or recovery therefrom, unless the student requests voluntarily to participate in a separate portion of the program or activity of the recipient.
( 2 ) A recipient may require such a student to obtain the certification of a physician that the student is physically and emotionally able to continue participation as long as such a certification is required of all students for other physical or emotional conditions requiring the attention of a physician.
( 3 ) A recipient that operates a portion of its education program or activity separately for pregnant students, admittance to which is completely voluntary on the part of the student as provided in paragraph (b)(1) of this section, shall ensure that the separate portion is comparable to that offered to non-pregnant students.
( 4 ) Subject to § 1211.235(d), a recipient shall treat pregnancy, childbirth, false pregnancy, termination of pregnancy and recovery therefrom in the same manner and under the same policies as any other temporary disability with respect to any medical or hospital benefit, service, plan, or policy that such recipient administers, operates, offers, or participates in with respect to students admitted to the recipient's educational program or activity.
( 5 ) In the case of a recipient that does not maintain a leave policy for its students, or in the case of a student who does not otherwise qualify for leave under such a policy, a recipient shall treat pregnancy, childbirth, false pregnancy, termination of pregnancy, and recovery therefrom as a justification for a leave of absence for as long a period of time as is deemed medically necessary by the student's physician, at the conclusion of which the student shall be reinstated to the status that she held when the leave began.
§ 292.70 Indemnification. The owner and/or operator of mining claims and the owner and/or lessee of outstanding mineral rights are jointly and severally liable in accordance with Federal and State laws for indemnifying the United States for the following: ( a ) Costs, damages, claims, liabilities, judgments, injury and loss, including those incurred from fire suppression efforts, and environmental response actions and cleanup and abatement costs incurred by the United States and arising from past, present, and future acts or omissions of the owner, operator, or lessee in connection with the use and occupancy of the unpatented mining claim and/or mineral operation. This includes acts or omissions covered by Federal, State, and local pollution control and environmental statutes and regulations.
( b ) Payments made by the United States in satisfaction of claims, demands, or judgments for an injury, loss, damage, or costs, including for fire suppression and environmental response action and cleanup and abatement costs, which result from past, present, and future acts or omissions of the owner, operator, or lessee in connection with the use and occupancy of the unpatented mining claim and/or mineral operations.
( c ) Costs incurred by the United States for any action resulting from noncompliance with an approved plan of operations or activities outside an approved operating plan.
NINETIETH CONGRESS 

fiRST SESSION-Began January 10, 1967 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Prepared unde1' the direction of FRANCIS R. VALEO, Secretary of the Senate 

By GERALD A. HACKETT, Executive Clerk 

Monday, September 18, 1967 

UNANIMOUS-CONSENT AGREEMENT 

Ordered, That the Senate proceed to vote on the resolution of ratification of Ex. I (90! h Cong., l5t sess.), 

the consular convention between the United States of America and France, at 3 o'clock p.m. on Monday, 

Sept. 18, 1967. 

(Sept. 14, 1967) 

TREATY 

Date or Calendar! Treaty No 3ub)ec: Action of committee report No. I 

1967 

Sept. 13 21 Ex I (90th Cong., The consular conventiOn between the United Reported favorably by 

1st SeSb) States of Amenca and France, together Mr. Fulbright, from 

with a protocol and 2 exchanges of notes the Committee on 

relatmg theret0, signed at Paris on Foreign Relatiom, 

July 18, 1966. with a printed report 

(See Ex. Rept. No 

15, 90th Cong., 1st 

sess.) 

---

RESOLUTION 

Date of R~solut10n No T1tlc .Act lOu of conumttcc I CPO! t 

1967 

Sept. 14 S. Ex. Res. L ______ _ Resolution for the withdrawal of certain Reported favorably by Mr. 

treaties. Fulb1ight, from the Committee on Foreign Reln.tions, 

with a printed report. (See 

Ex. Rept No. 16, 90th 

Cong., 1st sess) 

85-022--67--No.91 

US G"OVERNN~Ni PRINTING. Off-ICE 196
Date of 

report 

1967 

Sept. 13 

~ttttttr nf tqr luitr~ ~tatrs NINETIETH CONGRESS 

FIRST SESSION-Began January 10, 1967 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Prepa1'ed under the di1'ection of FRANCIS R. VALEO, Secretary of the Senate 

By GERALD A. HACKETT, Executive Clerk 

Thursday, September 14, 1967 

TREATY 

!Calendar Treaty No. Subject Action o! commit tee No. 

21 Ex. I (90th Cong., The consular convention between the United Reported favorably by 

1st sess.) States of America and France, together Mr. Fulbright, from 

with a protocol and 2 exchanges of notes the Committee on 

relating thereto, signed at Paris on Foreign Relation3, 

July 18, 1966. with a printed report. 

(See Ex. Rept. No. 

15, 90th Cong., 1st 

sess.) 

85-022--67--No.SO 

U.S . GOVERNME.HT PRINTING OFFICE: IU1
**Exhibit 13(b)**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, theundersigned officer of Amcor Limited (the “Company”), hereby certifiesthat, to the best of his knowledge, the Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-Ffor the fiscal year ended June 30, 2003 (the “Report”) fully complieswith the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated:  December 16, 2003 | /s/ W. Peter Day                |   |
|---------------------------|---------------------------------|--------|
|                      | Name: W.  Peter Day             |
|                      | Title: Chief  Financial Officer |

 

----