|UNITED STATESSECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONWashington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-Q

/x/   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 27, 2003


/ /   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _______ to _______

Commission File Number 001-15019


PEPSIAMERICAS, INC.(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Delaware                                                                       |  | 13-6167838                                             
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | -------------------------------------------------------
|(State or other jurisdiction of
                incorporation or organization) |  | (I.R.S. Employer
                Identification Number)

|4000 Dain Rauscher Plaza,
                60 South Sixth Street
                Minneapolis, Minnesota |  | 55402     
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | ----------
|(Address of principal executive offices)                                                               |  | (Zip Code)

|Registrant's telephone number, including area code (612) 661-4000


Indicate by check mark
whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days.
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|YES | /x/ | NO | / / | 
|--- | --- | -- | --- | 

|Indicate by check mark whether the registrant
is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2).
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|YES | /x/ | NO | / / | 
|--- | --- | -- | --- | 

|As of October 31, 2003 the Registrant
had 144,329,823 outstanding  shares
of common  stock,  par value  $0.01 per  share,  the
Registrant's only class of common stock.
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---

|PEPSIAMERICAS, INC.FORM 10-QTHIRD QUARTER 2003
|----------------------------------------------

|TABLE OF CONTENTS
|-----------------

|              |  |                       |                                                                                            |     
|------------- |  | --------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | ----
|              |  |                       |                                                                                            | Page
|              |  |                       |                                                                                            |     
|PART I        |  | FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|             
|              |  | Item 1.               | Financial Statements                                                                       |     
|              |  |                       | Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income                                                | 2   
|              |  |                       | Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets                                                      | 3   
|              |  |                       | Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows                                            | 4   
|              |  |                       | Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements                                       | 5   
|             
|              |  | Item 2.               | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
     and Results of Operations | 15  
|             
|              |  | Item 3.               | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk                                 | 24  
|             
|              |  | Item 4.               | Controls and Procedures                                                                    | 25  
|             
|PART II       |  | OTHER INFORMATION    
|             
|              |  | Item 1.               | Legal Proceedings                                                                          | 26  
|             
|              |  | Item 6.               | Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K                                                           | 26  
|             
|SIGNATURE     |  |                       |                                                                                            | 27  
|             
|EXHIBIT INDEX |  |                       |                                                                                            | 28  

|1
|-

---

|PEPSIAMERICAS, INC.CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME(unaudited
and in millions, except per share data)
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|                                                                          | Third Quarter |        | First Nine Months |  
|------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------- | ------ | ----------------- | -
|                                                                          |               |        |                   |  
|                                                                          | 2003          |        | 2002              |  
|                                                                          |               |        |                   |  
|                                                                          |               |        |                   |  
|Net sales                                                                 | $             | 865.0  |                   | $
|Cost of goods sold                                                        |               | 494.4  |                   |  
|                                                                          |               |        |                   |  
|Gross profit                                                              |               | 370.6  |                   |  
|Selling, delivery and administrative expenses                             |               | 260.2  |                   |  
|Amortization expense                                                      |               | 0.1    |                   |  
|Special charges, net                                                      |               | ( 1.0  | )                 |  
|                                                                          |               |        |                   |  
|Operating income                                                          |               | 111.3  |                   |  
|Interest expense, net                                                     |               | ( 16.8 | )                 |  
|Other expense, net                                                        |               | ( 2.4  | )                 |  
|                                                                          |               |        |                   |  
|Income from continuing operations before
                    income taxes |               | 92.1   |                   |  
|Income taxes                                                              |               | 29.6   |                   |  
|                                                                          |               |        |                   |  
|Income from
                continuing operations                         |               | 62.5   |                   |  
|Loss from discontinued operations,
                after taxes            |               |       |                   |  
|                                                                          |               |        |                   |  
|Net income                                                                | $             | 62.5   |                   | $
|                                                                          |               |        |                   |  
|                                                                          |               |        |                   |  
|Weighted average common shares:                                           |               |        |                   |  
|Basic                                                                     |               | 142.9  |                   |  
|Incremental effect of stock options and awards                            |               | 1.0    |                   |  
|                                                                          |               |        |                   |  
|Diluted                                                                   |               | 143.9  |                   |  
|                                                                          |               |        |                   |  
|                                                                          |               |        |                   |  
|Income (loss) per share - basic:                                          |               |        |                   |  
|Continuing operations                                                     | $             | 0.44   |                   | $
|Discontinued operations                                                   |               |       |                   |  
|                                                                          |               |        |                   |  
|Net income                                                                | $             | 0.44   |                   | $
|                                                                          |               |        |                   |  
|                                                                          |               |        |                   |  
|Income (loss) per share - diluted:                                        |               |        |                   |  
|Continuing operations                                                     | $             | 0.43   |                   | $
|Discontinued operations                                                   |               |       |                   |  
|                                                                          |               |        |                   |  
|Net income                                                                | $             | 0.43   |                   | $
|                                                                          |               |        |                   |  
|                                                                          |               |        |                   |  
|                                                                          |               |        |                   |  
|Cash dividends per share                                                  | $             |       |                   | $
|                                                                          |               |        |                   |  

|See accompanying notes to condensed
consolidated financial statements.
|----------------------------------------------------------------------

|2
|-

---

|PEPSIAMERICAS, INC.CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
            (unaudited and in millions, except per share data)
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|                                                                                                                                 |   | End ofThird Quarter2003 |   |   | End ofFiscal Year2002 |  
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | - | ----------------------- | - | - | --------------------- | -
|                                                                                                                                 |   |                         |   |  
|ASSETS:                                                                                                                          |   |                         |   |   |                       |  
|Current assets:                                                                                                                  |   |                         |   |   |                       |  
|Cash and equivalents                                                                                                             | $ | 86.0                    |   | $ | 113.8                 |  
|Receivables                                                                                                                      |   | 198.9                   |   |   | 202.6                 |  
|Inventories                                                                                                                      |   | 188.1                   |   |   | 170.2                 |  
|Other current assets                                                                                                             |   | 69.1                    |   |   | 63.3                  |  
|                                                                                                                                 |   |                         |   |  
|Total current assets                                                                                                             |   | 542.1                   |   |   | 549.9                 |  
|Property (at cost)                                                                                                               |   | 2,044.0                 |   |   | 1,977.8               |  
|Accumulated depreciation                                                                                                         |   | ( 950.0                 | ) |   | ( 847.0               | )
|                                                                                                                                 |   |                         |   |  
|Net property                                                                                                                     |   | 1,094.0                 |   |   | 1,130.8               |  
|Intangible assets, net                                                                                                           |   | 1,763.7                 |   |   | 1,757.7               |  
|Other assets                                                                                                                     |   | 111.2                   |   |   | 124.2                 |  
|                                                                                                                                 |   |                         |   |  
|Total assets                                                                                                                     | $ | 3,511.0                 |   | $ | 3,562.6               |  
|                                                                                                                                 |   |                         |   |  
|                                                                                                                                 |   |                         |   |   |                       |  
|LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS'
                EQUITY:                                                                            |   |                         |   |   |                       |  
|Current liabilities:                                                                                                             |   |                         |   |   |                       |  
|Short-term debt, including current maturities of long-term debt                                                                  | $ | 196.6                   |   | $ | 303.1                 |  
|Payables                                                                                                                         |   | 208.5                   |   |   | 197.9                 |  
|Other current liabilities                                                                                                        |   | 148.8                   |   |   | 197.0                 |  
|                                                                                                                                 |   |                         |   |  
|Total current liabilities                                                                                                        |   | 553.9                   |   |   | 698.0                 |  
|                                                                                                                                 |   |                         |   |  
|Long-term debt                                                                                                                   |   | 1,071.7                 |   |   | 1,080.7               |  
|Deferred income taxes                                                                                                            |   | 122.7                   |   |   | 82.2                  |  
|Other liabilities                                                                                                                |   | 237.7                   |   |   | 253.1                 |  
|                                                                                                                                 |   |                         |   |  
|Total liabilities                                                                                                                |   | 1,986.0                 |   |   | 2,114.0               |  
|                                                                                                                                 |   |                         |   |  
|Shareholders' equity:                                                                                                            |   |                         |   |   |                       |  
|Preferred stock ($0.01 par value, 12.5 million shares authorized;      
                no shares issued)                        |   |                        |   |   |                      |  
|Common stock ($0.01 par value, 350 million shares authorized;      
                167.6 million shares issued - 2003 and 2002) |   | 1,534.7                 |   |   | 1,538.7               |  
|Retained income                                                                                                                  |   | 402.7                   |   |   | 288.0                 |  
|Unearned stock-based compensation                                                                                                |   | ( 9.6                   | ) |   | ( 8.6                 | )
|Accumulated other comprehensive loss:                                                                                            |   |                         |   |   |                       |  
|Cumulative translation adjustment                                                                                                |   | ( 7.5                   | ) |   | ( 9.2                 | )
|Net unrealized investment and hedging losses                                                                                     |   | ( 3.1                   | ) |   | ( 9.8                 | )
|Minimum pension liability                                                                                                        |   | ( 27.9                  | ) |   | ( 27.9                | )
|                                                                                                                                 |   |                         |   |  
|Accumulated other comprehensive loss                                                                                             |   | ( 38.5                  | ) |   | ( 46.9                | )
|Treasury stock, at cost (23.3 million shares - 2003 and 20.0 million   
                shares - 2002)                           |   | ( 364.3                 | ) |   | ( 322.6               | )
|                                                                                                                                 |   |                         |   |  
|Total shareholders' equity                                                                                                       |   | 1,525.0                 |   |   | 1,448.6               |  
|                                                                                                                                 |   |                         |   |  
|Total liabilities and shareholders' equity                                                                                       | $ | 3,511.0                 |   | $ | 3,562.6               |  
|                                                                                                                                 |   |                         |   |  

|See accompanying notes to condensed
consolidated financial statements.
|----------------------------------------------------------------------

|3
|-

---

|PEPSIAMERICAS, INC.CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(unaudited and in millions)
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|                                                                                               | First Nine Months |        
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------- | -------
|                                                                                               |                   |        
|                                                                                               |                   | 2003   
|                                                                                               |                   |        
|                                                                                               |                   |        
|CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING
                ACTIVITIES:                                          |                   |        
|Income from continuing operations                                                              | $                 | 120.6  
|Adjustments to reconcile to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:               |                   |        
|Depreciation and amortization                                                                  |                   | 131.4  
|Deferred income taxes                                                                          |                   | 31.5   
|Special charges, net                                                                           |                   | 6.4    
|Cash outlays related to special charges                                                        |                   | ( 6.5  
|Gain on sale of investments                                                                    |                   | ( 2.1  
|Other                                                                                          |                   | 6.6    
|Changes in assets and liabilities,
                exclusive of acquisitions and divestitures: |                   |        
|Decrease (increase) in receivables                                                             |                   | 3.7    
|Increase in inventories                                                                        |                   | ( 17.9 
|Increase in payables                                                                           |                   | ( 14.7 
|Net change in other assets and liabilities                                                     |                   | ( 13.8 
|                                                                                               |                   |        
|Net cash provided by operating activities                                                      |                   | 245.2  
|                                                                                               |                   |        
|                                                                                               |                   |        
|CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:                                                          |                   |        
|Capital investments                                                                            |                   | ( 97.9 
|Acquisitions, net
                of cash acquired                                             |                   | ( 2.5  
|Proceeds from sales of investments                                                             |                   | 6.4    
|Proceeds from sales of property                                                                |                   | 2.9    
|                                                                                               |                   |        
|Net cash used in investing activities                                                          |                   | ( 91.1 
|                                                                                               |                   |        
|                                                                                               |                   |        
|CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:                                                          |                   |        
|Net borrowings (repayments) of
                short-term debt                                 |                   | 18.2   
|Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt                                                       |                   | 146.3  
|Repayment of long-term debt                                                                    |                   | ( 279.4
|Treasury stock purchases                                                                       |                   | ( 66.6 
|Issuance of common stock                                                                       |                   | 7.1    
|Cash dividends                                                                                 |                   | ( 5.7  
|                                                                                               |                   |        
|Net cash used in financing activities                                                          |                   | ( 180.1
|                                                                                               |                   |        
|                                                                                               |                   |        
|Net cash used in
                discontinued operations                                       |                   | ( 1.7  
|Effects of exchange rate changes
                on cash and equivalents                       |                   | ( 0.1  
|                                                                                               |                   |        
|Change in cash and equivalents                                                                 |                   | ( 27.8 
|Cash and equivalents at
                beginning of year                                      |                   | 113.8  
|                                                                                               |                   |        
|Cash and equivalents at end
                of first nine months                               | $                 | 86.0   
|                                                                                               |                   |        

|See accompanying notes
to condensed consolidated financial statements.
|----------------------------------------------------------------------

|4
|-

---

|PEPSIAMERICAS, INC.NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(unaudited)
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|1. | Significant Accounting
                Policies
|-- | -----------------------------------------------

| | Quarterly reporting - The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included herein have
been prepared by PepsiAmericas, Inc. (the Company) without audit.  Certain information and
disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States have been condensed or omitted pursuant to the rules and regulations
of the Securities and Exchange Commission, although the Company believes that the disclosures made are
adequate to make the information presented not misleading.  It is suggested that these Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in
the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year 2002.  In the opinion of management, the
information furnished herein reflects all adjustments (consisting only of normal, recurring adjustments)
necessary for a fair statement of results for the interim periods presented.
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | The Companys fiscal year consists of 52 or 53 weeks ending on the Saturday closest to December 31; fiscal
2002 ended on December 28, 2002.  The Companys third quarters and first nine months of 2003 and 2002 were based on the thirteen
and thirty-nine weeks ended September 27, 2003 and September 28, 2002, respectively.  The Companys business is highly seasonal;
accordingly, the operating results of any individual quarter may not be indicative of a full years
operating results.
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | Net income per share - Basic net income per share is based upon the weighted-average number of
common shares outstanding.  Diluted net income per share assumes the exercise of all options, which are
dilutive, whether exercisable or not.  The dilutive effects of stock options are measured under the treasury
stock method.
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | Options to purchase the following shares were
not included in the computation of diluted net income per share because the exercise price was greater than the average
market price of the common shares during the related period:
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |                                           | Third Quarter |           | First Nine Months |  
| | ----------------------------------------- | ------------- | --------- | ----------------- | -
| |                                           |               |           |                   |  
| |                                           | 2003          |           | 2002              |  
| |                                           |               |           |                   |  
| |                                           |               |           |                   |  
| | Shares under options outstanding          |               | 8,927,777 |                   |  
| | Weighted-average exercise price per share | $             | 17.88     |                   | $

| | Impact of Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 02-16 - In the first quarter of 2003, the Company
prospectively adopted Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 02-16, Accounting by a
Customer (including a Reseller) for Certain Consideration Received from a Vendor.  EITF Issue No. 02-16 concludes
that certain consideration received by a customer from a vendor is presumed to be a reduction of the price
of the vendors products, and therefore, should be recorded as a reduction of cost of goods sold when
recognized in the customers income statement, unless certain criteria are met.  This presumption is
overcome if the consideration paid to the customer is directly attributable (offsetting) to incremental and
separately identifiable expenses incurred elsewhere in the income statement.  Prior to the adoption of EITF
Issue No. 02-16, bottler incentives (marketing support programs) from brand owners were recognized as an increase to
net sales or as a reduction in selling, delivery and administrative expenses (SD&A) based
on the objectives of the programs and initiatives.  In accordance with EITF Issue No. 02-16, the Company recorded certain
bottler incentives as a reduction of cost of goods sold beginning in the first quarter of 2003 to properly account for
new agreements.  Bottler incentives that are directly attributable to incremental expenses incurred
are reported as either an increase to net sales or a reduction to SD&A expenses, commensurate with the
recognition of the related expense.  All other bottler incentives are recognized as a reduction of cost of
goods sold when the related products are sold and shipped based on the agreements with vendors.
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|5
|-

---

| | Assuming that EITF Issue No. 02-16 had been in place at the beginning of fiscal year 2002,
the following adjustments
would have been made to our third quarter and first nine months 2002 reported results:
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |                                 |   | ThirdQuarterof 2002 |   |   | FirstNine Monthsof 2002 |  
| | ------------------------------- | - | ------------------- | - | - | ----------------------- | -
| |                                 |   |                     |   |  
| | Net sales                       |   |                     |   |   |                         |  
| | As reported                     | $ | 874.3               |   | $ | 2,482.0                 |  
| | EITF Issue No. 02-16 adjustment |   | ( 21.3              | ) |   | ( 61.5                  | )
| |                                 |   |                     |   |   |                         |  
| | Adjusted comparisons            | $ | 853.0               |   | $ | 2,420.5                 |  
| |                                 |   |                     |   |  
| |                                 |   |                     |   |   |                         |  
| | Cost of goods sold              |   |                     |   |   |                         |  
| | As reported                     | $ | 524.6               |   | $ | 1,491.9                 |  
| | EITF Issue No. 02-16 adjustment |   | ( 33.0              | ) |   | ( 96.6                  | )
| |                                 |   |                     |   |  
| | Adjusted comparisons            | $ | 491.6               |   | $ | 1,395.3                 |  
| |                                 |   |                     |   |  
| | SD&A                            |   |                     |   |   |                         |  
| | As reported                     | $ | 247.5               |   | $ | 721.3                   |  
| | EITF Issue No. 02-16 adjustment |   | 11.7                |   |   | 35.1                    |  
| |                                 |   |                     |   |  
| | Adjusted comparisons            | $ | 259.2               |   | $ | 756.4                   |  
| |                                 |   |                     |   |  

| | Reclassifications  Certain amounts in the prior period Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | Recently issued accounting pronouncements  In April 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 145, Recission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44, and 64, Amendment of
FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections.  Under SFAS No. 4, all gains and losses from extinguishment of debt were
required to be aggregated and, if material, classified as an extraordinary item, net of related income tax effect.  This Statement
eliminates SFAS No. 4 and thus, the criteria in Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 30 should be applied to determine the classification of gains and
losses related to the extinguishment of debt.  The Statement was effective beginning in the first quarter of 2003.  As a result, the
loss on the early extinguishment of debt recorded in the first quarter of 2003 was recognized in Interest expense, net in the
Condensed Consolidated Income Statement, as the criteria in APB Opinion No. 30 were not met for extraordinary classification.  See
Debt note for further discussion.
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | In June 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities, which
nullifies EITF Issue No. 94-3,
Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred
in a Restructuring).  SFAS No. 146 requires that a liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal activity be recognized
and measured at fair value when the liability is incurred, as opposed to the date management committed to an exit plan.  The special
charges in the fourth quarter of 2002, related to the marketing and distribution strategy changes in Central Europe, were recorded in
compliance with EITF Issue No. 94-3, as the provisions of SFAS No. 146 are effective for exit or disposal activities that are initiated after
December 31, 2002.  The special charges in the first nine months of 2003 were recorded in compliance with SFAS No.
146.
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|6
|-

---

| | Stock-based compensation  The Company uses the intrinsic value method of
accounting for its stock-based compensation under APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees.  No stock-based employee compensation cost for options is reflected in net income, as all
options granted had an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying common stock on the date
of grant.  The following table illustrates the effect on net income and net income per share if the Company
had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation, to stock-based employee compensation.  The table (in millions, except per share data)
is presented pursuant to
amended disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation-
Transition and Disclosure.
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|                                                                                                                                                                      | Third Quarter |       | First Nine Months |  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------- | ----- | ----------------- | -
|                                                                                                                                                                      |               |       |                   |  
|                                                                                                                                                                      | 2003          |       | 2002              |  
|                                                                                                                                                                      |               |       |                   |  
|                                                                                                                                                                      |               |       |                   |  
|Net income, as reported                                                                                                                                               | $             | 62.5  |                   | $
|Deduct:  total stockbased employee
                   compensation expense determined under   fair value based method for all options,
                   net of tax |               | ( 0.8 | )                 |  
|                                                                                                                                                                      |               |       |                   |  
|Pro forma net income                                                                                                                                                  | $             | 61.7  |                   | $
|                                                                                                                                                                      |               |       |                   |  
|Basic:     As reported                                                                                                                                                | $             | 0.44  |                   | $
|                                                                                                                                                                      |               |       |                   |  
|Pro forma                                                                                                                                                             | $             | 0.43  |                   | $
|                                                                                                                                                                      |               |       |                   |  
|Diluted:  As reported                                                                                                                                                 | $             | 0.43  |                   | $
|                                                                                                                                                                      |               |       |                   |  
|Pro forma                                                                                                                                                             | $             | 0.43  |                   | $
|                                                                                                                                                                      |               |       |                   |  

| | The Black-Scholes model and the assumptions presented in the following table were used to estimate the fair values of the options
granted for the third quarters and first nine months of 2003 and 2002.  The weighted-average estimated fair values at the dates of grant of options
in the third quarter
of 2003 and the third quarter of 2002 were $3.28 and $4.40, respectively.  In the first nine months of 2003 and 2002, the weightedaverage
estimated fair values at the dates of grant of options were $3.28 and $3.90, respectively.
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |                                       |  |  | 2003 |  | 2002  | 
| | ------------------------------------- |  |  | ---- |  | ----- | 
| |                                       |  |  |      |  |       | 
| | Risk-free interest rate               |  |  |      |  | 2.8%  | 
| | Expected dividend yield               |  |  |      |  | 0.3%  | 
| | Expected volatility                   |  |  |      |  | 26.0% | 
| | Estimated lives of options (in years) |  |  |      |  | 5.0   | 

|7
|-

---

|2. | Special Charges
|-- | ---------------

| | In the first nine months of 2003, the Company recorded special charges, net, of $6.4 million.  In
the U.S., the Company recorded $5.8 million in the first quarter of 2003 related to the reduction in
workforce.  This charge was primarily for severance-related costs, including the acceleration of restricted stock awards.
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | In Central Europe, the Company recorded special charges of $5.7 million during the fourth quarter of 2002 related to changes
in the Company's marketing and distribution strategy in Poland, the Czech Republic and Republic of Slovakia.  The Company
recorded additional charges related to the marketing and distribution strategy changes of $1.1 million and $1.9 million
for the third quarter of 2003 and the first nine months of 2003, respectively.  Due to favorable outcomes associated with
outstanding lease obligations and severance payments in Poland related to the 2002 charge, the Company recorded a special charge
reversal of
$2.1 million during the third quarter of 2003.
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | In the Caribbean, the Company recorded a special charge of $0.8 million during the second quarter of 2003 that consisted mainly
of asset write-downs related to the shutdown of the Barbados manufacturing facility.  Similar to the changes being made in
Central Europe, the Company has rationalized operations in Barbados.  Distribution is now outsourced through
a local partner and production is sourced from a different manufacturing location.
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | The following table summarizes activity associated with the special charges (in millions):
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |                                                                                                                                             | 2003Charge |       | 2002Charge |   | 2001Charge |   | Total |      
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------- | ----- | ---------- | - | ---------- | - | ----- | -----
| |                                                                                                                                             |            |       |            |   |            |   |       |      
| |                                                                                                                                             |            |       |            |   |            |   |       |      
| | Accrued liabilities as of
                fiscal year end 2002    (employee-related, lease cancellation and
                   other costs) | $          |      |            | $ | 4.3        |   | $     | 0.3  
| | U.S. special charges                                                                                                                        |            | 5.8   |            |   |           |   |       |     
| | Central Europe special
                charges                                                                                              |            | 1.9   |            |   |           |   |       |     
| | Caribbean special charges                                                                                                                   |            | 0.8   |            |   |           |   |       |     
| | Asset write-downs                                                                                                                           |            | ( 2.7 | )          |   |           |   |       |     
| | Acceleration of
                stock awards vesting                                                                                        |            | ( 0.3 | )          |   |           |   |       |     
| | Expenditures for
                employee-related and other costs                                                                           |            | ( 5.1 | )          |   | ( 0.9      | ) |       | ( 0.1
| | Expenditures for lease terminations                                                                                                         |            |      |            |   | ( 0.2      | ) |       |     
| | Reversal of Central Europe special charges                                                                                                  |            |      |            |   | ( 2.1      | ) |       |     
| |                                                                                                                                             |            |       |            |   |            |   |       |      
| | Accrued liabilities at the
                end of the third quarter of 2003                                                                 | $          | 0.4   |            | $ | 1.1        |   | $     | 0.2  
| |                                                                                                                                             |            |       |            |   |            |   |       |      

| | The 2003 and 2002 special charges affected approximately 712 employees, of which approximately 252 remain as
of the end of the third quarter of 2003.  The accrued liabilities remaining as of the end of the third
quarter of 2003 are comprised of deferred severance payments and certain employee benefits, lease
cancellation costs and other costs.   The Company expects to pay a significant portion of the $1.7 million
using cash from operations during the next twelve months; accordingly, such amounts are classified as other
current liabilities.
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|8
|-

---

|3. | Interest Expense, Net
|-- | ---------------------

| | Interest expense, net, is comprised of the following (in millions):
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------

| |                       | Third Quarter |        | First Nine Months |  
| | --------------------- | ------------- | ------ | ----------------- | -
| |                       |               |        |                   |  
| |                       | 2003          |        | 2002              |  
| |                       |               |        |                   |  
| |                       |               |        |                   |  
| | Interest expense      | $             | ( 17.4 | )                 | $
| | Interest income       |               | 0.6    |                   |  
| |                       |               |        |                   |  
| | Interest expense, net | $             | ( 16.8 | )                 | $
| |                       |               |        |                   |  

| | In the first nine months of 2003, interest expense included $8.8 million related to the loss on the
early extinguishment
of debt, which occurred in the first quarter of 2003. See the Debt note for further discussion.
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | Interest income in the first nine months of 2003 included $6.4 million related to the settlement of a tax matter involving the
Company's previously terminated Employee Stock Ownership
Plan (ESOP), which occurred in the first quarter of 2003.  See the Income Taxes note for further discussion.
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|4. | Income Taxes
|-- | ------------

| | In the first nine months of 2003, the Company recorded a net
tax benefit of $7.7 million related to the reversal of certain tax
accruals and the settlement of the ESOP tax matter, offset by additional tax liabilities recorded.  In the third quarter of 2003, the Company recorded a net tax benefit of
$6.0 million related mainly to the reversal of tax liabilities due to the conclusion of various income tax audits through the 1999
tax year.  In addition, the Company recorded a reduction to net deferred tax assets of $4.4 million, and a corresponding increase to
goodwill, related primarily to the resolution of the above mentioned tax audits, which impacted amounts recorded in purchase accounting.
The Company also recorded additional tax accruals
of $4.3 million for liabilities arising in the first quarter of 2003.
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | In the first quarter of 2003, the Company favorably settled
a tax refund case for $12.4 million with the U.S. Government that arose
from the 1990 termination of the Companys ESOP.  The tax settlement consisted of $6.4 million of interest income ($4.0 million after
taxes) and a tax benefit of $6.0 million recorded in Income taxes.
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | Excluding such adjustments to tax liabilities, as well as the ESOP settlement tax benefit, the effective income tax rate for the
first nine months of 2003 was 38.5 percent, compared to the prior year first nine months effective tax rate of 39.0 percent.
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|5. | Comprehensive Income
|-- | --------------------

| | The Companys comprehensive income
was as follows (in millions):
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------

| |                                                                         | Third Quarter |      | First Nine Months |  
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------- | ---- | ----------------- | -
| |                                                                         |               |      |                   |  
| |                                                                         | 2003          |      | 2002              |  
| |                                                                         |               |      |                   |  
| |                                                                         |               |      |                   |  
| | Net income                                                              | $             | 62.5 |                   | $
| | Foreign currency translation adjustment                                 |               | 1.0  |                   |  
| | Net unrealized investment and hedging
                   gains (losses) |               | 0.9  |                   |  
| |                                                                         |               |      |                   |  
| | Comprehensive income                                                    | $             | 64.4 |                   | $
| |                                                                         |               |      |                   |  

|9
|-

---

| | Net unrealized investment and hedging gains (losses) are presented net of tax expense of
$0.5 million in the third quarter of 2003 and $3.9 million in the first nine months of
2003, respectively, and net of tax benefit of $3.6 million in the third quarter of
2002 and $4.8 million in the first nine months of 2002, respectively.
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|6. | Inventory
|-- | ---------

| | As of the end of the third quarter
of 2003, inventory was approximately 44 percent comprised of raw materials and supplies and 56 percent
comprised of finished goods.  This mix is relatively consistent with the mix of inventory at the end of fiscal year 2002.
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|7. | Intangible Assets and Goodwill
|-- | ------------------------------

| | The changes in the carrying value
of goodwill by geographic segment for the first nine months of 2003 were as follows (in millions):
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |                                                         | U.S. |         | CentralEurope |   | Caribbean |  | Total |      
| | ------------------------------------------------------- | ---- | ------- | ------------- | - | --------- |  | ----- | -----
| |                                                         |      |         |               |   |           |  |       |      
| |                                                         |      |         |               |   |           |  |       |      
| | Balance at end of year
                2002             | $    | 1,706.6 |               | $ | 28.2      |  | $     | 17.1 
| | Purchase accounting adjustment (see Note 4)             |      | 4.4     |               |   |          |  |       |     
| | Cumulative translation adjustment                       |      |        |               |   | 2.1       |  |       | ( 0.2
| |                                                         |      |         |               |   |           |  |       |      
| | Balance at end of third
                quarter of 2003 | $    | 1,711.0 |               | $ | 30.3      |  | $     | 16.9 
| |                                                         |      |         |               |   |           |  |       |      

| |                                       | End of Third Quarter 2003 |    
| | ------------------------------------- | ------------------------- | ---
| |                                       |                           |    
| |                                       | GrossCarryingAmount       |    
| |                                       |                           |    
| | Amortized intangible assets:          |                           |    
| | Non-compete agreements                | $                         | 1.0
| | Franchise and distribution agreements |                           | 3.7
| |                                       |                           |    
| | Total                                 | $                         | 4.7
| |                                       |                           |    
| | Unamortized intangible asset:         |                           |    
| | Pension intangible asset              | $                         | 2.1
| |                                       |                           |    
| | Total                                 | $                         | 6.8
| |                                       |                           |    

|8. | Investments
|-- | -----------

| | In the second quarter of 2003, the Company entered into an agreement with Grupo Empresarial Mariposa Corporation (Gemcorp), a 100%
owner of the outstanding shares of the Central American Bottling Corporation (Cabcorp), to purchase 3,807 shares of stock of
Cabcorp.  Three equal annual payments of $2.5 million will be made to Gemcorp beginning in the third quarter of 2003.  For each payment made, the Company receives 1,269 shares of Cabcorp stock.  After the 3,807 shares of Cabcorp have been
received, the Company will have a 1.5% interest in Cabcorp.
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | In the second quarter of 2002, the Company recorded a $3.5 million gain related to the sale of its interest in a parcel of land in
downtown Chicago.  The gain is reflected in "Other income (expense), net."  The Company received $26.5 million in cash and a $12.0
million promissory note collateralized by a subordinated mortgage related to the sale.  An additional $1.4 million, otherwise payable
to the Company, was held back in escrow, a portion of which is expected to be recovered when certain conditions are met related to
existing environmental matters. The promissory note and escrow balance were recorded at their estimated realizable value, net of
allowances of approximately $6.5 million.  In addition, the Company recorded $2.5 million of liabilities, net, for certain
indemnifications made pursuant to the sale agreement.
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|10
|--

---

| | In the second quarter of 2003, the Company recorded an additional $2.1 million gain related to the land sale, as certain
indemnification accruals were reduced due to the favorable resolution of related contingencies.  The gain is reflected in "Other income (expense),
net."
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | All other investments in real estate are carried at cost, which management believes is lower than the net realizable value.
Investments in real estate are included in other assets on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|9. | Debt
|-- | ----

| | On September 4, 2003, a new universal shelf registration
statement became effective under which $1 billion of debt securities may be
offered.  The debt securities will be unsecured, senior debt obligations and will rank equally with all other unsecured and
unsubordinated indebtedness. No debt securities have been issued
from this shelf registration.
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | On March 6, 2003, the Company
issued $150 million of notes with a coupon rate of 4.5 percent and a maturity date of March 2013.
These notes are included in long-term debt in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.  The proceeds
were used to redeem the $150 million face value 5.79 percent notes issued in March 2001.  In anticipation of
the issuance of the notes in the first quarter of 2003, the Company entered into a
treasury rate lock agreement.  See the Financial Instruments note for further discussion of this
transaction.
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | During the first
quarter of 2003, the investors of the $150 million  face value 5.79 percent notes notified the Company that they
would exercise their option to purchase and resell the notes pursuant to the remarketing agreement, unless
the Company elected to redeem the notes.  In March 2003, the Company elected to redeem the notes and paid total premiums of $17.7 million
in connection with the repurchase.  The remaining unamortized premium, including the
value of the option net of issuance costs related to the repurchased notes, was $5.7 million.
In addition, the Company settled a treasury rate lock agreement related to the repurchased notes and received $3.2 million.  See the
Financial Instruments note for further discussion of this transaction.   As a result, the Company recorded a loss on the early
extinguishment of debt of $8.8 million in Interest expense, net in the first quarter of 2003.
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|10. | Financial Instruments
|--- | ---------------------

| | The Company uses financial instruments to hedge against volatility in future cash flows on anticipated aluminum can
purchases, the prices of which are indexed to aluminum market prices.  Realized gains and losses on aluminum hedge contracts are
deferred until the related finished products are sold.  See Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | The Company has hedged a portion of its anticipated aluminum
can purchases through November 2004.  As of the end of the third quarter
      of 2003 and fiscal year 2002, the Company had deferred $0.5 million (net of $0.3 million in deferred income taxes) of aluminum
hedging gains and $3.3 million (net of $1.9 million in deferred income taxes) of aluminum hedging losses, respectively,
in Accumulated other
      comprehensive loss.  A majority of the deferred aluminum hedging gains as of third quarter of 2003 will be reclassified into cost of goods sold during the next 18 months.
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | During the third quarter of 2001 and the third quarter
of 2003,
the Company entered into interest rate swap contracts with an aggregate notional amount of $200 million and $150 million, respectively, to convert a
portion of its fixed rate debt to a floating rate basis, with the objective of reducing overall borrowing costs.
These swaps are accounted for as fair value hedges, since they hedge against the change in fair value of fixed rate
debt resulting from fluctuations in interest rates.  The fair value of the interest rate swaps as of the
third quarter of 2003 and fiscal year 2002 was $18.6 million (net of $2.9 million interest receivable), and $20.0 million (net of $1.7
million interest receivable), respectively, which is reflected in
Other long-term assets on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, with a corresponding
increase in Long-term debt representing the change in fair value of the fixed rate debt.  The
fair value adjustment had no earnings impact since the swaps are considered highly effective in eliminating
the interest rate risk of the fixed rate debt they are hedging.
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | In anticipation of the long-term
debt issuances in the third quarter of 2002 and in the first quarter of 2003, the Company entered into a
series of treasury rate locks with an aggregate notional amount of  $250 million and $150 million,
respectively.  These treasury rate locks were accounted for as cash flow hedges, as the treasury rate locks
hedged against the variability of interest payments on the forecasted issuance of fixed-rate debt
attributable to changes in interest rates. The treasury rate locks were settled for $2.5 million and
$1.2 million, concurrent with the debt issuances in the third quarter of 2002 and in the first quarter of
2003, respectively. At the end of the third quarter of 2003 and fiscal year 2002, the Company had deferred approximately $1.8 million
(net of $1.1 million in deferred income taxes) and $1.6 million (net of $0.9 million in deferred income taxes) of losses, respectively,
in Accumulated other comprehensive loss in the
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, as the treasury rate locks were considered highly effective in eliminating the
interest rate risk on the forecasted debt issuances. Amounts included in other comprehensive loss are
reclassified into earnings commensurate with the recognition of the interest expense on the newly issued
debt.
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|11
|--

---

| | In addition, in anticipation of
the early extinguishment of $150 million of notes in the first quarter of 2003, the Company
entered into a reverse treasury rate lock agreement.  The reverse treasury rate lock was accounted for as a
cash flow hedge, as the reverse treasury rate lock hedged against the
variability of interest rates related to the forecasted extinguishment of debt.  The reverse treasury rate
lock was settled and a
payment was received in the first quarter of 2003 for $3.2 million, and recognized in Interest expense, net in the
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income as a reduction in the loss
on the early extinguishment of debt.
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|11. | Stock Options and Awards
|--- | ------------------------

| | In February 2003, the Company
granted 453,100 restricted shares at a weighted-average fair value (at the date of grant) of $12.01 to key
members of management under the Companys Stock Incentive Plan (the Plan).  The Company
recognized compensation expense of $1.4 million and $1.1 million in the third quarter of 2003 and third quarter of 2002, respectively,
related to this grant and previous grants in 2002 and 2001.  In the first nine months of 2003 and 2002, the Company recognized compensation expense
of $4.2 million and $2.6 million, respectively, for such grants.  At the end of third quarter 2003,
there were 1,179,641 unvested restricted shares outstanding under the Plan.
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|12. | Supplemental Cash Flow Information
|--- | ----------------------------------

| | Net cash provided by operating
activities reflected cash payments and receipts for interest and income taxes as follows (in millions):
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |                                              | First Nine Months |     
| | -------------------------------------------- | ----------------- | ----
| |                                              |                   |     
| |                                              | 2003              |     
| |                                              |                   |     
| |                                              |                   |     
| |                                              |                   |     
| | Interest paid, including debt extinguishment | $                 | 79.6
| | Interest received                            |                   | 6.9 
| | Income taxes paid, net of refunds            |                   | 14.4

|13. | Environmental and Other
                Commitments and Contingencies
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------

| | The Company maintains a continuous program in its operations to facilitate compliance with federal, state and local laws and
       regulations relating to management of wastes and to the discharge or emission of materials used in production, and such other
       laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment.  The capital costs of such management and compliance,
       including the costs of the modification of existing plants and the installation of new manufacturing processes incorporating
       pollution control technology, are not material to continuing operations.
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | Indemnification obligations related to discontinued operations.  Under the agreement pursuant to which the Company sold its
       subsidiaries, Abex Corporation and Pneumo Abex Corporation (collectively, "Pneumo Abex") in 1988 and a subsequent settlement agreement entered into in
       September 1991, the Company has assumed indemnification obligations for certain environmental liabilities of Pneumo Abex, net
       of any insurance recoveries.  Pneumo Abex has been and is subject to a number of environmental cleanup proceedings, including
       proceedings under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 regarding disposal of wastes
       at on-site and off-site locations.  In some proceedings, federal, state and local government agencies are involved and other
       major corporations have been named as potentially responsible parties.  Pneumo Abex also has been and is subject to private
       claims and lawsuits for remediation of properties currently or previously owned by Pneumo Abex or certain other entities.
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|12
|--

---

| | There is an inherent uncertainty in determining the Companys potential expenses for complying with its indemnification obligations,
and in particular, in assessing the total cost of remediating a given site and in determining any individual party's share in that
cost.  This is because of the nature of the remediation and allocation process and due to the fact that the liabilities are at
different stages in terms of their ultimate resolution, and any assessment and determination are inherently speculative during the
early stages, depending upon a number of variables beyond the control of any party. Furthermore, there are often timing
considerations in that a portion of the expense incurred by Pneumo Abex, and any resulting obligation of the Company to indemnify
Pneumo Abex, may not occur for a number of years.
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | During the second quarter of 2000, proceeds of a settlement of insurance policies issued to a prior subsidiary were placed in a
      trust (the Trust).  The Trust documents specify that funds in the Trust would be used to pay future liabilities of the prior
      subsidiaries.  Monies paid by the Trust thereby would reduce the indemnification obligations of the Company.  At fiscal year end
      2001, the Company had $131.2 million accrued (net of the responsive Trust amount) to cover potential indemnification
      obligations.  As a result of the establishment of the Trust, the
      Company removed from its Consolidated Balance Sheet the portion of its liabilities to which the Trust was responsive, and the
      Trust held $34.3 million as of fiscal year end 2001.
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | In the latter part of 2001, the Company decided to investigate the use of insurance products to mitigate risks related to its
indemnification obligations under the 1988 agreement, as amended.  As a prerequisite to receiving bids for such insurance, the
insurance carriers required that the Company employ an outside consultant to perform a comprehensive review of all former facilities
related to the discontinued operations, regardless of whether any disputes had arisen with respect to a particular former site or
facility.  This comprehensive review was possible because of advances in the business of retrospective evaluation of the risk posed
by particular types of sites and the increased experience (and therefore available data) at the Companys former facilities.  The
consultants review was completed in the fourth quarter of 2001.  It provided a contingent indemnification liability for all known
sites operated or impacted by Pneumo Abex and resulted in the $111 million charge, or $71.2 million net of tax, recorded in the
fourth quarter of 2001.
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | During the second  quarter of 2002,  as part of a  comprehensive  program  concerning  environmental  liabilities  related to the
      former Whitman  Corporation  subsidiaries,  the Company  purchased new insurance  coverage  related to the known sites previously
      owned and  operated  or  impacted by Pneumo  Abex and its  subsidiaries,  along with other sites which  Pneumo Abex or one of its
      subsidiaries  may have owned or operated or impacted.  In addition,  the Trust purchased  insurance  coverage and funded coverage
      for remedial and other costs ("finite  funding")  related to the sites  previously  owned and operated or impacted by Pneumo Abex
      and its  subsidiaries.  In  conjunction  with  the  purchase  of the  insurance  policies,  the  Company  recorded  a  charge  to
      discontinued  operations of $9.8 million,  or $6 million after tax. This charge represented amounts expended by the Company and a
      reduction  of funds in the  Trust  available  to pay  expenses  related  to sites  for  which  the  Company  has  indemnification
      obligations.  These actions were taken to fund costs  associated  with the sites  previously  owned and operated or impacted
      by Pneumo Abex and its subsidiaries and to protect against  additional future costs in excess of a self-insured  retention of the
      Company.  The amount of  self-insured  retention  (the amount the Company must pay before the  insurance  carrier is obligated to
      commence  payments)  is $114  million.  The Company had accrued  $90  million at the end of fiscal year 2001 for  remediation  costs,  which was its best
      estimate of the  contingent  liabilities  related only to such  environmental  matters.  The finite funding of $26 million may be
      used to pay a portion of the $90  million,  which the  Company  had  accrued,  along with  previously  incurred  expenses  of the
      Company.  Essentially  all of the assets of the Trust were expended by the Trust in connection with the purchase of the insurance
      coverage and the finite funding and related expenses.
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | Because payments by the Trust for finite funding reduce cash
required to be paid by the Company for the environmental sites for which
the Company has indemnification obligations, the Company recorded the finite funding in "Other assets".  The finite funding amounts recorded were $24.5 million and $26.0 million at the end
of the third quarter 2003 and fiscal year 2002, respectively, which amounts included $15.8 million and $16.6 million recorded
in current assets at the end of the third quarter 2003 and fiscal year 2002, respectively.
At the end of the third quarter 2003, the Company had $127.3 million accrued to cover
potential indemnification obligations, compared to $138.1 million recorded at the end of fiscal year 2002.
Of the total amount accrued, $25.5 million was classified as current liabilities at the end of the third quarter 2003 and at the end of
fiscal year 2002.  These amounts exclude possible insurance recoveries under policies that were in place
prior to insurance policies purchased in the second quarter of 2002, and are determined on an undiscounted cash flow basis.
These estimated indemnification liabilities include expenses for the remediation of identified sites,
payments to third parties for claims and expenses (including product liability and toxic tort claims),
administrative expenses, and the expenses of on-going evaluations and litigation.  The Company expects a
significant portion of the accrued liabilities will be disbursed during the next 10 years.
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|13
|--

---

| | In addition, the Company had $13.3 million and $20.6 million
of receivables for future probable amounts to be received from insurance companies and other responsible parties as of the end of the
third quarter 2003 and fiscal year 2002, respectively.  These amounts are recorded as follows:  $3.4 million and $5.3 million were
included in "Other current assets" at the end of the third quarter 2003 and fiscal year 2002, respectively, with the remaining $9.9 million and $15.3
million recorded in "Other assets" in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of the end of the third quarter 2003 and fiscal year 2002,
respectively.
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | The Company also has certain
indemnification obligations related to product liability and toxic tort claims, which emanate out
of the 1988 agreement with Pneumo Abex.  The sites and product liability and toxic tort claims
included in the aggregate accrued liabilities the Company has recorded are described more fully in the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year 2002.  No significant changes in the status
of those sites or claims occurred and the Company was not notified of any significant new sites or claims during
the first nine months of 2003.
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | Although the Company has certain indemnification obligations for environmental liabilities at a number of other sites, including
      several superfund sites, it is not anticipated that the additional expense involved at any specific site would have a material
      effect on the Company.  In the case of some of the other sites, the volumetric contribution for which the Company has an
      obligation has in most cases been estimated and other large, financially viable parties are responsible for substantial portions
      of the remainder.  In the opinion of management, based upon information currently available, the ultimate resolution of these
      claims and litigation, including potential environmental exposures, and considering amounts already accrued, should not have a
      material effect on the Companys financial condition, although amounts recorded in a given period could be material to the
      results of operations or cash flows for that period.
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|14. | Segment Reporting
|--- | -----------------

| | The Company operates in
three geographic areas  the United States (U.S.), Central Europe and the Caribbean.  The Company does business in 18 states
      in the U.S., and, outside the U.S., the Company does business in Poland, Hungary, the Czech Republic, Republic of Slovakia,
      Puerto Rico, Jamaica, Barbados, the Bahamas and Trinidad and Tobago.
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | The following tables present net sales
and operating income (loss) of the Companys geographic segments for the third quarter and first nine months of 2003 and
      2002 (in millions).  The net sales are as reported and are not adjusted for the impact of EITF Issue No. 02-16 in fiscal year 2002.  See the "Significant
Accounting Policies" note for further discussion.
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |                | Third Quarter
| | -------------- | -------------
| |                |              
| |                | Net sales    
| |                |              
| |                | 2003         
| |                |              
| |                |              
| | U.S.           | $            
| | Central Europe |              
| | Caribbean      |              
| |                |              
| | Total          | $            
| |                |              

|14
|--

---

| |                | First Nine Months
| | -------------- | -----------------
| |                |                  
| |                | Net sales        
| |                |                  
| |                | 2003             
| |                |                  
| |                |                  
| | U.S.           | $                
| | Central Europe |                  
| | Caribbean      |                  
| |                |                  
| | Total          | $                
| |                |                  

| | There were no material changes in
total assets by geographic segment since the end of fiscal year 2002.
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|15. | Related Party Transactions
|--- | --------------------------

| | The Company is the number-two
anchor bottler in the Pepsi system.  The Company manufactures, packages, sells and distributes carbonated and non-carbonated Pepsi-Cola beverages and a variety of
      other beverages in the United States, Central Europe and the Caribbean.  The Company operates under exclusive franchise agreements
      with soft drink concentrate producers, including master bottling and fountain syrup agreements with PepsiCo, Inc. ("PepsiCo")
      for the manufacture, packaging, sale and distribution of PepsiCo branded products.  There are similar agreements with Cadbury Schweppes and other brand owners.  The franchise
      agreements exist in perpetuity and contain operating and marketing commitments and conditions for termination.
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | In addition, PepsiCo provides various services including
 the procurement of raw materials and the execution of derivatives contracts associated with certain related raw materials purchases.  PepsiCo holds a 39.7 percent equity interest
      in the Company.  See additional discussion of the Companys related party transactions in the Companys Annual Report on Form
      10-K for the fiscal year 2002.
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Item 2.      Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
|----------------------------

|The preparation of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States requires management to use estimates. These estimates are made using managements best judgment and the information
available at the time these estimates are made, including the advice of outside experts. For a better understanding of our
significant accounting policies used in preparation of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, please refer to our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year 2002. We focus your attention on the following critical accounting policies:
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | Goodwill Impairment.  Goodwill is tested for impairment at least annually, using a two-step approach at the reporting unit level: U.S., Central Europe and
the Caribbean. First, we estimate the fair value of the reporting units primarily using discounted estimated future cash flows. If
the carrying value exceeds the fair value of the reporting unit, the second step of the goodwill impairment test is performed to
measure the amount of the potential loss. Goodwill impairment is measured by comparing the implied fair value of goodwill with its
carrying amount. We will estimate the fair value of all assets in determining the implied fair value of goodwill. The impairment
evaluation requires the use of considerable management judgment to determine the fair value of the reporting units using discounted
future cash flows, including estimates and assumptions regarding amount and timing of cash flows, cost of capital and growth rates.
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|15
|--

---

| | Environmental Liabilities.  We continue to be subject to certain indemnification obligations under agreements related to previously sold subsidiaries, including
potential environmental liabilities (see Environmental and Other Commitments and Contingencies note to the Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements). We have recorded our best estimate of our probable liability under those indemnification obligations, with the
assistance of outside consultants and other professionals. Such estimates and the recorded liabilities are subject to various
factors, including possible insurance recoveries, the allocation of liabilities among other potentially responsible parties, the
advancement of technology for means of remediation, possible changes in the scope of work at the contaminated sites, as well as
possible changes in related laws, regulations, and agency requirements.
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | Income Taxes.  Our effective income tax rate and the tax bases of our assets and liabilities reflect managements best estimate of the outcome of
future tax audits. We have established valuation allowances using managements best judgment where expected results do not support
the realization of deferred tax assets.
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | Bottler Incentives.  Certain bottler incentives are earned only if a specified level of annual sales volume growth, or growth index, is achieved. We
record such bottler incentives during the interim periods based on our growth index achieved on a year-to-date basis compared to our
targets or specified levels of growth indices. The amounts are recorded as a reduction of cost of goods sold based on the actual
sales volume during the interim period. If actual sales volume differs from management estimates, gross margin and operating income
could be adversely affected.
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | Customer discounts and allowances.  Certain customer discounts and allowances are earned and payable to customers if a specified level of annual sales volume is met. We
record such customer discounts and allowances based on the estimated and probable sales volume for the annual period. The amounts are
recorded as a reduction of net sales based on the actual customers sales volume during the interim period. If actual annual sales
volume differs from management estimates, gross margin and operating income could be adversely affected.
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|RESULTS OF OPERATIONS2003 THIRD QUARTER COMPARED WITH 2002 THIRD QUARTER
|------------------------------------------------------------------------

|In the discussions of our results of operations below, the number of cases sold is referred to as volume. Net pricing is net sales
divided by the number of cases and gallons sold for our core businesses, which include bottles and cans (including vending bottles
and cans) as well as food service. Changes in net pricing include the impact of sales price (or rate) changes, as well as the impact
of brand, package and geographic mix. Net pricing and reported volume amounts exclude contract, commissary, private label,
concentrate, and vending (other than bottles and cans) revenue and volume. Contract sales represent sales of manufactured product to
other franchise bottlers and typically decline as excess manufacturing capacity is utilized. Cost of goods sold per unit is the cost
of goods sold for our core businesses divided by the related number of cases and gallons sold.
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Our business is highly seasonal; accordingly, the operating results of any individual quarter may not be indicative of a full years
operating results.
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|In addition, the discussion that follows includes both reported results, as well as adjusted comparison results, which assume that
EITF Issue No. 02-16 had been in effect beginning in the first quarter of 2002.  See the Significant Accounting Policies note to
the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for the adjustments and further discussion of the impact of EITF Issue No. 02-16.
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Volume
|------

|Third quarter 2003 worldwide volume decreased 3.3 percent compared to the prior year third quarter. The decline in worldwide
volume was attributed to a volume decline in
the U.S. of 3.7 percent and lower volumes in Central Europe.  Central Europe volumes
declined 3.2 percent in the third quarter of 2003, while Caribbean volume grew 1.4 percent.
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|16
|--

---

|The decline in U.S. volume of 3.7 percent in the third quarter of 2003 reflected continued softness across all channels and weakness
in trademark Pepsi.  Trademark Pepsi decreased in the low single digits in the third quarter of 2003 compared to prior year, improving from
the mid single-digit decline in the second quarter of 2003 compared to prior year.  Trademark Pepsi volumes benefited from the
introduction of Pepsi Vanilla in the third quarter of 2003 and modest growth in Diet Pepsi, offset by continued softness in brand
Pepsi.  Trademark Mountain Dew volumes were down in the low single digits driven by volume declines in brand Mountain Dew and the
lapping of the successful launch of Mountain Dew Code Red in the prior year, offset by the continued success of Mountain Dew LiveWire
and volume growth in Diet Mountain Dew.  Trademark Pepsi and trademark Mountain Dew accounted for approximately 75 percent of our
volume in the third quarter of 2003.  Sierra Mist volume continued to achieve strong double-digit growth, while Aquafina volumes
declined in the mid single digits for the second consecutive quarter.  We expect the strong marketing calendar and package innovation
scheduled for the fourth quarter of 2003, as well as the comparison to softer volumes in the prior year fourth quarter, to improve
our volume trends for the balance of the year.
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Total volume in Central Europe decreased 3.2 percent in the third quarter of 2003, driven mainly by volume declines in water, as
volumes in core carbonated soft drink and new age beverages remained strong, growing in the low single digits.  Volumes in the Caribbean increased 1.4 percent compared
to the same period last year primarily reflecting strong volume growth in Puerto Rico.
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Net Sales
|---------

|Net sales decreased $9.3 million, or 1.1 percent, to $865.0 million in the third quarter of 2003 compared to $874.3 million the third
quarter of 2002. On a comparable basis, assuming that EITF Issue No. 02-16 had been in effect during 2002, net sales would have
increased $12.0 million, or 1.4 percent, in the third quarter of 2003, compared to the prior year third quarter, primarily reflecting increased net
pricing in the U.S. and favorable foreign exchange rates in Central Europe, offset, in part, by volume declines in the U.S. and
Central Europe.
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Net sales in the U.S. for the third quarter of 2003 decreased $13.3 million to $725.3 million from $738.6 million in the prior
year third quarter. On a
comparable basis, assuming that EITF Issue No. 02-16 had been in effect during 2002, net sales would have increased $8.0 million, or
1.1 percent, primarily the result of the 3.8 percent increase in net pricing,
offset, in part, by the 3.7 percent decline in volume.  The improvement in net pricing was
driven by price increases of 3.3 percent and package mix contribution of 0.5 percent, and the improved net pricing is expected to continue
for the balance of the year.
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|The increase in Central Europe net sales of $3.3 million, or 3.8 percent, to $90.6 million in the third quarter of 2003 from $87.3
million in the prior year third quarter resulted from an increase in net pricing and favorable foreign exchange rates, offset by a 3.2 percent
decline in volume. The favorable foreign exchange rates contributed approximately $6.1 million to Central Europes net sales in the
third quarter of 2003.  Net sales benefited from higher net pricing, primarily in Hungary.
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Net sales in the Caribbean increased 1.4 percent in the third quarter of 2003 to $49.1 million from $48.4 million in the prior year third
quarter.  The increase in net sales resulted from volume growth of 1.4 percent related mainly to Puerto Rico, as net pricing
for the Caribbean remained relatively flat.
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Cost of Goods Sold
|------------------

|Cost of goods sold decreased $30.2 million, or 5.8 percent, to $494.4 million in the third quarter of 2003 from $524.6 million in the
prior year third quarter. Assuming that EITF Issue No. 02-16 had been in effect during 2002, cost of goods sold would have increased $2.8 million,
or 0.6 percent.
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|In the U.S., cost of goods sold decreased $31.0 million, to $407.1 million in the third quarter of 2003 from $438.1 million in the
prior year third quarter. On a comparable basis, assuming that EITF Issue No. 02-16 had been in effect during 2002, costs of goods sold would have
increased $1.0 million, or 0.2 percent, due to a higher cost of goods sold per unit.  The increase in cost of goods sold per unit in
the U.S. primarily reflected higher concentrate costs and increased ingredient and packaging costs related to product mix.
Concentrate costs in 2003, which represent approximately 40 percent of total product costs in the U.S., will continue to be higher, as
PepsiCo concentrate prices increased by approximately 2 percent, effective
for one year, beginning February 2003.
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|17
|--

---

|In Central Europe, cost of goods sold increased $0.6 million, or 1.2 percent, to $50.7 million in the third quarter of 2003, compared
to $50.1 million in the prior year third quarter.  Assuming that EITF Issue No. 02-16 had been in effect during 2002, Central Europe cost of goods
sold would have increased $1.6 million in the third quarter of 2003, compared to the prior year.  Cost of goods sold increased mainly
due to the unfavorable impact of foreign exchange rates, as the increase in cost of goods sold due primarily to higher concentrate
costs was approximately offsetting to the lower cost of goods sold based on volume declines.
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|In the Caribbean, cost of goods sold increased $0.2 million, or 0.5 percent, to $36.6 million in the third quarter of 2003, compared
to $36.4 million in the third quarter of 2002, driven mainly by the increase in volume of 1.4 percent, offset, in part, by a
reduction in ingredient and packaging costs.
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Selling, Delivery and Administrative
                Expenses
|-------------------------------------------------------------

|In the third quarter of 2003, SD&A expenses increased $12.7 million, or 5.1 percent, to $260.2 million from $247.5 million in the
comparable period of the previous year.  On a comparable basis, assuming that EITF Issue No. 02-16 had been in effect in 2002, SD&A
increased $1.0 million, or 0.4 percent and, as a percentage of net sales, SD&A expenses decreased to 30.1 percent in the third
quarter of 2003, compared to 30.4 percent in the prior year third quarter.  The decline in SD&A as a percentage of net sales was
primarily attributed to lower operating costs achieved internationally, as the SD&A as a percentage of net sales remained flat in the U.S.
compared to the prior year third quarter.
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|In the U.S., SD&A expenses increased $13.4 million to $215.3 million in the third quarter of 2003, compared to $201.9 million in the
prior year third quarter.  On a comparable basis, assuming that EITF Issue No. 02-16 had been in effect in 2002, SD&A expenses
increased $2.7 million or 1.3 percent.  On a comparable basis, SD&A expenses as a percentage of net sales remained flat at 29.7
percent compared to the prior year third quarter, mainly as a result of the realization of our cost containment initiatives.
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|In Central Europe, SD&A expenses decreased $0.2 million, or 0.6 percent, to $33.1 million from $33.3 million
in the prior year third quarter. Excluding the $1.7
million unfavorable impact of foreign currency rates and the $1.0 million unfavorable impact of the adoption of EITF Issue No.
02-16 in 2003, SD&A expenses declined $2.9 million in the third quarter of 2003, compared to the prior year third quarter.  The lower
SD&A costs can be mainly attributed to the successful rationalization of costs in the Central Europe operations through the use of an
alternative distribution method in certain markets in Hungary implemented in the previous year, and the continued rollout of such a distribution method in Poland, the
Czech Republic, and Republic of Slovakia in the current year.  SD&A expenses in the Caribbean decreased $0.5 million to $11.8
million in the third quarter of 2003, and improved as a percentage of net sales.
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Special Charges
|---------------

|In the third quarter of 2003, we recorded a $1.0 million net reversal in special charges related to the continued modification of
Central Europes distribution method.  The net reversal in special charges resulted primarily from favorable outcomes associated
with outstanding lease obligations and severance payments which combined totaled approximately $2.1 million, offset, in part, by additional charges of
$1.1 million.  This compares to a net special charge reversal of $1.1 million in the third quarter of 2002 of excess severance and
related exit costs related to previously recorded special charges in Poland.
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Operating Income
|----------------

|Operating income increased $8.2 million, or 8.0 percent, to $111.3 million in the third quarter of 2003, compared to $103.1 million
in the prior year third quarter, driven by a $4.3 million increase in operating income in the U.S. and an increase in international operating
income of $3.9 million.  The increase in operating income in the U.S. was primarily attributed to higher gross margins due to improved
net pricing compared to the prior year, which offset the impact of lower volumes, and the modest SD&A expense increase.
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|18
|--

---

|Operating income in Central Europe increased $2.9 million to $7.9 million in the third quarter of 2003, compared to $5.0 million in
the prior year third quarter, due to lower SD&A expenses and the favorable impact of foreign exchange rates of approximately $1.3 million, as the
favorable impact of the net special charge reversals were approximately offsetting as discussed above in Special Charges.  Operational performance in the Caribbean improved, as operating income in the
Caribbean of $0.7 million in the third quarter of 2003 was $1.0 million higher than the operating losses of $0.3 million in the prior
year.
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Interest and Other Expenses
|---------------------------

|Net interest expense decreased $2.4 million in the third quarter of 2003 to $16.8 million, compared to $19.2 million in the prior
year third quarter, due mainly to the overall lower interest rates benefiting our borrowing costs on short-term borrowings and our
floating rate long-term debt, as well as the refinancing of a portion of our fixed rate long-term debt in the first quarter of 2003.
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|We recorded other expense, net, of $2.4 million in the third quarter of 2003 compared to other expense, net, of $1.6 million reported
in the third quarter of 2002.
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Income Taxes
|------------

|In the third quarter of 2003, we recorded a net reversal of tax accruals of $6.0 million related primarily to the
conclusion of
various income tax audits through the 1999 tax year.  Excluding such adjustments to certain tax accruals, the effective income tax
rate, which is income tax expense expressed as a percentage of income from continuing operations before income taxes, was 38.5
percent for the third quarter of 2003, compared to 39.0 percent in the third quarter of 2002.
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Net Income
|----------

|Net income increased $12.3 million to $62.5 million in the third quarter of 2003, compared to $50.2 million in the third quarter of
2002.  The increase can be attributed, in part, to lower interest expense and the $6.0 million favorable impact related to certain income
tax accrual adjustments.  Operational factors impacting net income were previously discussed, which included the favorable impact of
changes in foreign exchange rates in Central Europe.
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|19
|--

---

|RESULTS OF OPERATIONS2003 FIRST NINE MONTHS COMPARED WITH 2002 FIRST NINE MONTHS
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Volume
|------

|Worldwide volume for the first nine months of 2003 decreased 4.3 percent, which included volume declines of 4.7 percent in the U.S.
and 5.1 percent in Central Europe, offset by an increase in Caribbean volume of 5.1 percent.  The decrease in worldwide volumes in
the first nine months was mainly due to the weak first quarter of 2003, the continued impact of operating in a soft retail
environment, and the lower volumes experienced in brand Pepsi and brand Mountain Dew in the U.S. markets.
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|The decline in U.S. volume of 4.7 percent in the first nine months of 2003 reflected continued softness in volume on our core
brands, Pepsi and Mountain Dew, as well as the impact of lapping strong volumes driven by product innovation in the first nine months
of last year.  We experienced softness across all channels, including continued volume declines in the small format channel.  From a
brand perspective, the decline in U.S. volume included mid single-digit declines in trademark Pepsi, driven mainly by lower volumes
in brand Pepsi, offset, in part, by the introduction of Pepsi Vanilla in the third quarter of 2003.  The low single-digit declines in
trademark Mountain Dew reflected lower volumes in brand Mountain Dew, offset, in part, by the introduction of LiveWire in the second
quarter of 2003 and volume increases in Diet Mountain Dew.  In the first nine months of 2003, we continued to achieve growth in Sierra
Mist and trademark Lipton.  Trademark
Aquafina volumes were relatively flat compared to the same period in the prior year.
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Total volume in Central Europe decreased 5.1 percent in the first nine months of 2003, due mainly to continued competitive pressures
in the water and carbonated soft drink categories, lapping strong volumes in the prior year, as well as the double-digit volume
declines experienced in the first quarter, driven in part by poor weather conditions in certain markets.
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Total volume in the Caribbean increased 5.1 percent compared to the same period last year primarily reflecting volume improvements in
Puerto Rico and Jamaica.
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Net Sales
|---------

|Net sales decreased $64.0 million, or 2.6 percent, to $2,418.0 million compared to $2,482.0 million the first nine months of 2002.
On a comparable basis, assuming that EITF Issue No. 02-16 had been in effect during 2002, net sales decreased $2.5 million, or 0.1
percent, in the first nine months of 2003, compared to the same period in the prior year, primarily reflecting decreased volumes in both the U.S. and
Central Europe offset, in part, by increased net pricing in the U.S. and favorable foreign exchange rates in Central Europe.
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Net sales in the U.S. for the first nine months of 2003 decreased $79.5 million to $2,039.8 million from $2,119.3 million in the
prior year.  On a comparable basis, assuming that EITF Issue No. 02-16 had been in effect during 2002, net sales would have decreased
$18.0 million, or approximately 1.0 percent over the same period in the prior year.  The decline in U.S. net sales was the result of
lower volumes in the first nine months of 2003 versus the same period of 2002.  The impact of the volume decline in the first nine months
of 2003 was offset, in part, by a 3.1 percent
increase in net pricing.  The improvement in net pricing was driven by price increases of approximately 2.1 percent and package mix contribution of 1.0 percent.
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Net sales in Central Europe increased $10.4 million, or 4.5 percent, to $242.2 million in the first nine months of 2003 from $231.8
million in the prior year.  The increase was attributed to the favorable impact of changes in foreign exchange rates of $24.4
million.  Net sales in the first nine months of 2003 compared to the same period in the prior year were negatively impacted by lower
volumes and the decline in net pricing, due mainly to the competitive pricing pressures experienced in Poland in the second quarter
of 2003, as well as significantly lower co-packing revenue in the Czech Republic in the first nine months of 2003.
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Caribbean net sales increased 3.9 percent in the first nine months of 2003 to $136.0 million from $130.9 million in the prior year
first nine months.  The increase in net sales resulted mainly from volume growth of 5.1 percent, primarily driven by growth in Puerto
Rico and Jamaica.
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|20
|--

---

|Cost of Goods Sold
|------------------

|Cost of goods sold decreased $90.3 million, or 6.1 percent, to $1,401.6 million in the first nine months of 2003 from $1,491.9
million in the comparable period last year.  Assuming that EITF Issue No. 02-16 had been in effect during 2002, cost of goods sold would have
increased $6.3 million, or 0.5 percent.
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|In the U.S., cost of goods sold decreased $96.9 million, to $1,160.4 million in the first nine months of 2003
from $1,257.3 million
in the first nine months of 2002.  On a comparable basis, assuming that EITF Issue No. 02-16 had been in effect during 2002, costs of goods sold
would have decreased $3.3 million, or 0.3 percent.  The decrease in cost of goods sold can be attributed primarily to the decline in
U.S. volume of 4.7 percent, offset, in part, by an increase in the cost of goods sold per unit.  The increase in cost of goods sold
per unit in the U.S. reflected higher concentrate costs, increased costs related to product mix, as well as decreases in brand owner
funding as a result of the declines in sales volume.  Concentrate costs in 2003 will continue to be higher, as PepsiCo concentrate prices
increased by approximately 2 percent, effective for one year, beginning February 2003.
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|In Central Europe, cost of goods sold increased $2.4 million, or 1.8 percent, to $138.3 million in the first nine months of
2003, compared to $135.9 million in the same period in the previous year.  Assuming that EITF Issue No. 02-16 had been in effect during 2002, Central
Europe cost of goods sold would have increased $5.4 million in the first nine months of 2003, compared to the prior year, due
primarily to the unfavorable impact of foreign exchange rates of $12.3 million.  Excluding the impact of foreign exchange rates and
on a comparable basis, cost of goods sold decreased $6.9 million, or 5.2 percent, which can be primarily attributed to the volume
decline of 5.1 percent for the first nine months of 2003.
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|In the Caribbean, cost of goods sold increased $4.2 million, or 4.3 percent, to $102.9 million in the first nine months of 2003,
compared to $98.7 million in the first nine months of 2002, driven mainly by the increase in volume of 5.1 percent.
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Selling, Delivery and Administrative
                Expenses
|-------------------------------------------------------------

|In the first nine months of 2003, SD&A expenses increased $46.2 million, or 6.4 percent, to $767.5 million from $721.3 million in the
comparable period of the previous year.  On a comparable basis, assuming that EITF Issue No. 02-16 had been in effect in 2002, SD&A
expenses would have increased $11.1 million, or 1.5 percent and, as a percentage of net sales, SD&A expenses increased to 31.7
percent in the first nine months of 2003, compared to 31.2 percent in the prior year first nine months.
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|In the U.S., SD&A expenses increased $45.8 million to $631.1 million in the first nine months of 2003, compared to $585.3 million in
the prior year first nine months.  On a comparable basis, assuming that EITF Issue No. 02-16 had been in effect in 2002, SD&A
expenses would have increased $13.7 million or 2.2 percent.  As a percentage of net sales and on a comparable basis, SD&A expenses
increased to approximately 30.9 percent, compared to 30.0 percent.  The increase in SD&A expenses was primarily attributed to higher
insurance costs and depreciation expense.
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|In Central Europe, SD&A expenses increased $2.7 million to $102.1 million in the first nine months of 2003 from $99.4 million
in the prior year first nine months.  Excluding the $8.0 million unfavorable impact of foreign currency rates and the $3.0 million
unfavorable impact of the adoption of EITF Issue No. 02-16 in 2003, SD&A expenses would have declined $8.3 million in the first nine
months of 2003, compared to the prior year first nine months, primarily driven by cost savings in Poland and Hungary related, in
part, to the migration to an alternative marketing and distribution strategy.    SD&A expenses in the Caribbean decreased $2.3
million to $34.3 million in the first nine months of 2003, and improved as a percentage of net sales.
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Special Charges
|---------------

|In the first nine months of 2003, the Company recorded special charges, net, of $6.4 million, including the $5.8 million
charge in the
U.S. related to the reduction in workforce, and net charges of $0.6 million related to the changes in the production, marketing and
distribution strategies in the international operations.  The U.S. special charge of $5.8 million consisted mainly of severance
related costs, including the acceleration of restricted stock awards, associated with the announced reduction in our U.S. workforce
in the first quarter of 2003.
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Central Europe recorded special charges of $1.9 million in the first nine months of 2003 related to the modification of the
distribution method in Poland, the Czech Republic, and Republic of Slovakia, offset by a $2.1 million reversal of special charges
recorded in the third quarter of 2003 related to the favorable outcomes associated with outstanding lease obligations and severance
payments.  In the Caribbean, we recorded special charges of $0.8 million that consisted mainly of asset write-downs related to the
shutdown of the Barbados manufacturing facility.  Similar to the distribution changes we are making in Central Europe, we have
rationalized our operation in Barbados.  We are now outsourcing our distribution through a local partner and sourcing production from a
different manufacturing location.
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|21
|--

---

|Operating Income
|----------------

|Operating income decreased $27.2 million, or 10.1 percent, to $242.2 million in the first nine months of 2003, compared to $269.4
million in the first nine months of 2002, driven mainly by the decrease in operating income in the U.S. of $34.0 million.  The U.S. operating income
in the first nine months of 2003 included a special charge of $5.8 million related to the reduction in the U.S. workforce.  The
remaining decline in operating income in the U.S. was primarily attributed to the volume declines of 4.7 percent and the higher
SD&A expenses as a percentage of net sales, driven mainly by results in the first quarter of 2003, as the improvement in net pricing
was offset by higher costs of goods sold per unit for the first nine months of 2003.
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Operating income in Central Europe increased $4.4 million to $2.0 million in the first nine months of 2003, compared to a loss of
$2.4 million in the same period in the previous year.  The improvement was primarily attributed to favorable changes in foreign exchange
rates, which contributed $4.4 million to the operating income improvement.
Lower SD&A expenses were offset by the impact of lower volumes, the lower gross margin related to the loss of the co-packing
arrangement in  the Czech Republic, as
well as the year-over-year unfavorable impact of special charges of approximately $0.9 million.   In the Caribbean, operating losses
decreased to $2.0 million in the first nine months of 2003, compared to $4.4 million in the prior year.
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Interest and Other Expenses
|---------------------------

|Net interest expense in the first nine months of 2003 was $54.2 million, compared to $56.6 million in the same period in the prior
year.  Included in net interest expense in the first nine months of 2003 was a loss on the early extinguishment of debt of $8.8
million, offset, in part, by a $6.4 million increase in interest income due to the favorable resolution of a tax refund case related
to our previous Employee Stock Ownership Plan ("ESOP"), both recorded in the first quarter.  In addition, our borrowing costs have benefited from overall lower interest rates
and the refinancing of a portion of our fixed rate debt in the first quarter of 2003.
See the Debt and Income taxes notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion.
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|We recorded other expense, net, of $4.2 million in the first nine months of 2003 compared to other expense, net, of $2.4 million
reported in the first nine months of 2002.  Included in other expense, net, in the first nine months of 2002 was a pre-tax gain of
$3.5 million resulting from the sale of a parcel of land in downtown Chicago.  In the first nine months of 2003, we recorded an
additional gain on the same land sale of $2.1 million related to the reduction of certain accruals due to the favorable resolution of
related contingencies.
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Income Taxes
|------------

|The effective income tax rate was 34.4 percent for the first nine months of 2003.  Excluding the additional tax accruals recorded of
$4.3 million in the first quarter, the tax benefit recorded of $6.0 million related to the favorable tax settlement that arose from the 1990 termination
of our ESOP in the first quarter, and the net reversal of tax accruals of $6.0 million related primarily to the conclusion of various income tax audits
through the 1999 tax year in the third quarter, the effective tax rate for the first nine months of 2003 was 38.5 percent, compared to 39.0 percent in the
first nine months of 2002. See the Income Taxes note to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of
the significant items recorded in Income taxes.
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Income from Continuing Operations
|---------------------------------

|Income from continuing operations decreased $7.8 million to $120.6 million in the first nine months of 2003, compared to $128.4
million in the first nine months of 2002.  The decline can mainly be attributed to the decline in the U.S. operating performance
driven mainly by the poor results of the first quarter of 2003, as previously discussed, as well as the unfavorable impact of
special charges of $6.4 million recorded during the first nine months of 2003, compared to a net reversal of special charges of $1.1
million in the first nine months of 2002.
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Income from Discontinued Operations
|-----------------------------------

|Loss from discontinued operations after taxes of $6.0 million in 2002 represented a $9.8 million charge for the purchase of certain
insurances policies concerning the environmental liabilities related to previously sold subsidiaries.  See the "Environmental and Other
Commitments and Contingencies" note to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion.
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|22
|--

---

|Net Income
|----------

|Net income decreased $1.8 million to $120.6 million in the first nine months of 2003, compared to $122.4 million in the first nine
months of 2002.  The decrease in net income primarily reflected the decline in the operating performance of the U.S. markets and the
year-over-year unfavorable impact of special charges of $7.5 million ($4.6 million after taxes), offset by the loss from discontinued
operations net of taxes of $6.0 million that was recorded in the first nine months of 2002.  See the previously discussed additional
factors impacting operating performance in the U.S. and net income.
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
|-------------------------------

|Net cash provided by operating activities increased by $14.7 million to $245.2 million in the first nine months of 2003,
compared to $230.5 million in the first nine months of 2002.  The increase in net cash provided by operating activities in the first
nine months of 2003 can be mainly attributed to the decrease in receivables, due in part, to the improved days of credit sales
outstanding and the timing of cash receipts, offset by an increase in other assets and liabilities due mainly to timing of cash
payments.
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Investing activities in the first nine months of 2003 included capital investments of $97.9 million, compared to $159.4 million in
the first nine months of 2002.  The decline in capital expenditures was primarily due to planned lower spending on machinery and
equipment and vending.  We expect our capital spending to be in the range of $155 million to $175 million for the full year 2003.  In
addition, investing activities included an investment of $2.5 million in Central American Bottling Corporation ("Cabcorp"), a Guatemalan
company (see the "Investments" note in the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of this transaction).  We have made a
commitment to pay additional amounts of $2.5 million per year in 2004 and 2005 associated with this transaction.
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Our total debt decreased $115.5 million to $1,268.3 million at the end of the third quarter of 2003, from $1,383.8 million at
the end of fiscal year 2002.  In the first quarter of 2003, we issued $150 million of notes due in March 2013 with a coupon rate of
4.5 percent.  Net proceeds from these notes were $146.3 million, which reflected the reduction for discount and issuance costs totaling
$2.6 million,
as well as a treasury rate lock settlement payment of $1.1 million.  The proceeds were used to redeem $150 million of notes that were issued
in March 2001.  In February 2003, the investors of the $150 million of notes issued in March 2001 notified us that they wanted to
exercise their option to purchase and remarket the notes pursuant to the remarketing agreement, unless we elected to redeem the
notes.  In March 2003, we redeemed the notes pursuant to the agreement.  We paid approximately $164.5 million for the fair value of
the debt to be extinguished, net of the reverse treasury rate lock settlement of $3.2 million.  In addition, we repaid $125 million
of 7.25 percent notes that came due during the first quarter of 2003.  During the first nine months of 2003, we repurchased
approximately 4.3 million shares of our common stock for $56.0 million, compared to 3.9 million shares for $56.1 million during the
first nine months of 2002.  In addition, during 2003 we paid $10.6 million relating to treasury stock purchases that were unsettled and
included in Other current liabilities at the end of 2002.  The issuance of common stock from treasury shares for the exercise of stock options resulted in cash
inflows of $7.1 million in the first nine months of 2003, compared to $4.8 million in the first nine months of 2002.
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|We have a revolving credit agreement with maximum borrowings of $500 million, which acts as a back-up for our $500 million commercial
paper program; accordingly, we have a total of $500 million available under the commercial paper program and revolving credit
facility combined.  Total commercial paper borrowings were $21.5 million at the end of the third quarter of 2003.  There were no
commercial paper borrowings at the end of fiscal year 2002.  In the third quarter of 2003, we effected a new universal shelf registration
under which $1 billion of debt securities can be offered.  The debt securities will be unsecured, senior debt obligations and will
rank equally with all other unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness.  No debt securities have been issued from this shelf registration.
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|See the Annual Report on Form 10-K from fiscal year 2002 for a summary
of our contractual obligations as of the end of fiscal year 2002.  There were no significant changes to such contractual obligations
in the first nine months of 2003, except as discussed above related to our extinguishment and issuance of new debt and our new
investment in Cabcorp.  We believe that our existing operating cash flows are sufficient to fund our existing operations for the foreseeable
future.  In addition, we believe that with our existing operating cash flows, available lines of credit, and
the potential for additional debt and equity offerings, we will have sufficient resources to fund our future growth and expansion.
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
|--------------------------

|We are a licensed producer and distributor of Pepsi carbonated soft drinks and other non-alcoholic beverages.  We purchase concentrate from PepsiCo to be used in the production of Pepsi carbonated soft drinks and other non-alcoholic beverages.
PepsiCo also provides us with various forms of bottler incentives (marketing support programs) to promote Pepsis brands.  These
bottler incentives cover a variety of initiatives, including marketplace support, equipment-related programs, and shared media and
advertising support, and are recorded pursuant to EITF Issue No. 02-16.  See the Significant Accounting Policies note to the
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of bottler incentives.  There are no conditions or requirements
which could result in the repayment of any support payments received by us.
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|23
|--

---

|We manufacture and distribute fountain products and provide fountain equipment service to PepsiCo customers in certain territories in
accordance with various agreements.  There are other products that we produce and/or distribute through various arrangements with
PepsiCo or partners of PepsiCo.  We also purchase finished beverage products from PepsiCo and certain of its affiliates including
tea, concentrate and finished beverage products from a Pepsi/Lipton partnership, as well as finished beverage products from a
Pepsi/Starbucks partnership.
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|In addition, we have entered into various transactions with Pohlad Companies and its subsidiaries.
Robert C. Pohlad, our Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer, is the President and owner of approximately 33 percent of the capital stock of Pohlad Companies.
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|See the Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year 2002 for further discussion of related party transactions.
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
|--------------------------

|This quarterly report on Form 10-Q contains certain forward-looking statements of expected future developments, as defined in the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The forward-looking statements in this Form 10-Q refer to the expectations
regarding continuing operating improvement and other matters. These forward-looking statements reflect our expectations and are based
on currently available data; however, actual results are subject to future risks and uncertainties, which could materially affect
actual performance. Risks and uncertainties that could affect such future performance include, but are not limited to, the following:
competition, including product and pricing pressures; changing trends in consumer tastes; changes in the our relationship
and/or support programs with PepsiCo and other brand owners; market acceptance of new product offerings; weather conditions; cost and
availability of raw materials; availability of capital; labor and employee benefit costs; unfavorable interest rate and currency
fluctuations; costs of legal proceedings; outcomes of environmental claims and litigation; and changes in legislation and general
economic, business and political conditions in the countries and territories where we operate.
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|These events and uncertainties are difficult or impossible to predict accurately and many are beyond our control. We assume no
obligation to publicly release the result of any revisions that may be made to any forward-looking statements to reflect events or
circumstances after the date of such statements or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events.
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Item 3.      Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures
About Market Risk.
|------------------------------------------------------------------------

|We are subject to various market risks, including risks
from changes in commodity prices, interest rates and currency
exchange rates.
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Commodity Prices
|----------------

|The risk from commodity price changes relates to our ability to recover higher product costs through price increases to customers,
which may be limited due to the competitive pricing environment that exists in the soft drink business.  We use derivative financial
instruments to hedge price fluctuations for a portion of our aluminum requirements over a specified period of time.  Because of the
high correlation between commodity prices and our contractual cost of these products, we consider these hedges to be highly
effective.  As of the end of the third quarter of 2003, we hedged a portion of our anticipated aluminum can purchases through
November 2004.
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Interest Rates
|--------------

|In the third quarter of 2003, the risk from changes in interest rates was not material to our operations because a significant
portion of our debt issues represented fixed rate obligations.  Our floating rate exposure relates to changes in the six month LIBOR
rate and the overnight Federal Funds rate.  Assuming consistent levels of floating rate debt with those held at the end of the third
quarter of 2003, a 50 basis point (0.5 percent) change in each of these rates would not have had a significant impact on our third
quarter and first nine months of 2003 interest expense.  We have entered into interest rate swaps to convert a portion of our fixed
rate debt to floating rate debt.  We had cash equivalents throughout the third quarter of 2003, principally invested in money market
funds and commercial paper, which were most closely tied to overnight Federal Funds rates.  Assuming a change of 50 basis points in
the rate of interest associated with our cash equivalents at the end of the third quarter of 2003, interest income for the third
quarter and first nine months of 2003 would not have changed by a significant amount.
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|24
|--

---

|Currency Exchange Rates
|-----------------------

|Because we operate in international franchise territories, we are subject to exposure resulting from changes in currency exchange
rates.  Currency exchange rates are influenced by a variety of economic factors including local inflation, growth, interest rates and
governmental actions, as well as other factors.  We currently do not hedge the translation risks of investments in our international
operations.  Any positive cash flows generated by international operations have been reinvested in the operations, or used to repay
intercompany loans.
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|International operations, based on net sales, represented approximately 16 percent of our total operations in the
third quarter and first nine months of 2003, respectively.  A significant portion of the net sales in the Caribbean markets,
specifically Puerto Rico, are denominated in U.S. dollars, which is Puerto Ricos functional currency.  Changes in currency exchange
rates impact the translation of the results of certain international operations from their local currencies into U.S. dollars.  If
the currency exchange rates had changed by five percent in the third quarter and first nine months of 2003, we estimate the impact on
reported operating income for those periods would not have been significant.  Our estimate reflects the fact that a portion of the
international operations costs are denominated in U.S. dollars, including concentrate purchases.  This estimate does not take into
account the possibility that rates can move in opposite directions and that gains in one category may or may not be offset by losses
from another category.
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Item 4.      Controls and Procedures.
|-------------------------------------

|We maintain a system of disclosure controls and procedures that is designed to provide reasonable assurance that information, which
is required to be disclosed, is accumulated and communicated to management timely.  At the end of the period covered by this
report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management,
including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our
disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective in timely alerting
them to material information relating to us required to be included in our periodic
SEC filings.
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|During the third quarter of 2003, there were no significant changes in our internal control
over financial reporting or in other factors that
have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal
control over financial reporting.
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|25
|--

---

|PART II-OTHER INFORMATION
|-------------------------

|Item 1.      Legal Proceedings.
|-------------------------------

|No material changes to be reported for the third quarter of 2003.
|-----------------------------------------------------------------

|Item 6.      Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
|---------------------------------------------

|(a).      Exhibits.
|-------------------

|See Exhibit Index.
|--------------------

|(b).      Reports on Form 8-K.
|------------------------------

| | On July 23, 2003, the Company furnished a Current Report with regards to the Company's press release dated July 23, 2003, "PepsiAmericas
Reports Higher Earnings Per Share (EPS) for Second Quarter 2003."
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|26
|--

---

|SIGNATURE
|---------

|Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  | PEPSIAMERICAS, INC.
| |  | -------------------

|Dated: | November 12, 2003 | By: | /s/ G. MICHAEL DURKIN, JR.                                       
|------ | ----------------- | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------
|       |                   |     |                                                                  
|       |                   |     | G. Michael Durkin, Jr.                                           
|       |                   |     | Senior Vice President
                and Chief Financial Officer
|       |                   |     | (As Chief Accounting
                Officer and Duly            
|       |                   |     | Authorized Officer
                of PepsiAmericas, Inc.)       

|27
|--

---

|EXHIBIT INDEX
|-------------

|ExhibitNumber | Description of Exhibit
|------------- | ----------------------

|31.1 | Chief Executive Officer
        Certification pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|---- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|31.2 | Chief Financial Officer
        Certification pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|---- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|32.1 | Chief Executive Officer
        Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|---- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|32.2 | Chief Financial Officer
        Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002.
|---- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|28
|--