alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 194 (Friday, October 6, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 59095]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-8561]



[[Page 59095]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army


Department of Defense (DoD) Task Force on Mental Health; Meeting

AGENCY: Department of the Army, DoD.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of Public Law 92-463, The 
Federal Advisory Committee Act, announcement is made of the following 
meeting:
    Name of Committee: DoD Task Force on Mental Health, a Subcommittee 
of the Armed Forces Epidemiological Board.
    Dates: October 19, 2006 (Open Session), October 20, 2006 
(Afternoon--Open Session).
    Times: 0800-1700 (October 19, 2006); 1200-1700 (October 20, 2006).
    Location: Marriott San Diego Mission Valley, 8757 Rio San Diego 
Drive, San Diego, CA.
    Agenda: The purpose of the meeting is to obtain, review, and 
evaluate information related to the Mental Health Task Force's 
congressionally-directed task of assessing the efficacy of mental 
health services provided to members of the Armed Forces by the 
Department of Defense. The Task Force members will receive briefings on 
topics related to mental health concerns among military service members 
and mental health care delivery. The Task Force will hold a ``Town Hall 
Meeting'' session to hear concerns from the Navy San Diego community 
and conduct an executive working session.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Colonel Roger Gibson, Executive 
Secretary, Armed Forces Epidemiological Board, Skyline One, 5109 
Leesburg Pike, Room 682, Falls Church, VA 22041, (703) 681-8012/3.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Sessions on October 19, 2006 and October 20, 
2006 will be open to the public in accordance with Section 552b(b) of 
Title 5, U.S.C., specifically subparagraph (1) thereof and Title 5, 
U.S.C., appendix 1, subsection 10(d). Open sessions of the meeting will 
be limited by space accommodations. Any interested person may attend, 
appear before or file statements with the Board at the time and in the 
manner permitted by the Board.

Brenda S. Bowen,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 06-8561 Filed 10-5-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

I, H. Douglas Saathoff, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Nighthawk Systems, Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; and

b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)

disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)

all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal controls over financial reporting.

Date: May 20, 2009



| |     |                                      
| | --- | -------------------------------------
| | By: | /s/ H. Douglas Saathoff              
| |     | H. Douglas Saathoff                  
| |     | Chief Executive Officer and Principal
| |     | Accounting and Financial Officer
§ 1008.20 Petitions for amendment: Processing and initial decision. ( a ) *Decisions on petitions.* In reviewing a record in response to a petition for amendment, the accuracy, relevance, timeliness and completeness of the record shall be assessed against the criteria set out in § 1008.4.
( b ) *Authority to decide.* A decision on a petition for amendment shall be made by the Privacy Act Officer in consultation with the General Counsel.
( c ) *Acknowledgment of receipt.* Unless processing of a petition is completed within ten working days, the receipt of the petition for amendment shall be acknowledged in writing by the Privacy Act Officer.
( d ) *Inadequate petitions.* ( 1 ) If a petition does not meet the requirements of § 1008.19, the petitioner shall be so advised and shall be told what additional information must be submitted to meet the requirements of § 1008.19.
( 2 ) If the petitioner fails to submit the additional information within a reasonable time, the petition may be rejected. The rejection shall be in writing and shall meet the requirements of paragraph (e) of this section.
( e ) *Form of decision.* ( 1 ) A decision on a petition for amendment shall be in writing and shall state concisely the basis for the decision.
( 2 ) If the petition for amendment is rejected, in whole or part, the petitioner shall be informed in a written response which shall: ( i ) State concisely the basis for the decision;
( ii ) Advise the petitioner that the rejection may be appealed to the Executive Director, The Presidio Trust, P.O. Box 29052, San Francisco, CA 94129-0052; and
( iii ) State that the appeal must be received by the foregoing official within 20 working days of the decision.
( 3 ) If the petition for amendment involves records which fall under the jurisdiction of another agency and is rejected, in whole or part, the petitioner shall be informed in a written response which shall: ( i ) State concisely the basis for the decision;
( ii ) Include the name, position title, and address of the official responsible for the denial; and
( iii ) Advise the individual that an appeal of the rejection may be made only to the appropriate official of the relevant agency, and include that official's name, position title, and address.
( 4 ) Copies of rejections of petitions for amendment made pursuant to paragraphs (e)(2) and (e)(3) of this section will be provided to the Privacy Act Officer.
( f ) *Implementation of initial decision.* If a petition for amendment is accepted, in whole or part, the system manager maintaining the record shall: ( 1 ) Correct the record accordingly and,
( 2 ) Where an accounting of disclosures has been made pursuant to § 1008.10, advise all previous recipients of the record that the correction was made and the substance of the correction.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the Quarterly Report of Arrayit Corporation.
(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Rene A. Schena certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant
to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------









|                         | Arrayit Corporation   
|------------------------ | ----------------------
|                         |                       
|Dated: November 20, 2012 | By: /s/ RENE A. SCHENA
|                         | Rene A. Schena        
|                         | Chairman and Director
Editorial Note on Part 7
Editorial Note: The Alphabetical Listing is updated annually by the Office of the Federal Register.

§ 7.76 Wright Brothers National Memorial. ( a ) *Designated airstrip.* Wright Brothers National Memorial Airstrip, located at Kill Devil Hills, N.C.
( b ) *Use of airstrip.* Except in emergencies, no aircraft may be parked, stopped, or left unattended at the designated airstrip for more than 24 consecutive hours, or for more than a total of 48 hours during any 30-day period.
[32 FR 2564, Feb. 7, 1967]
#### Charles L. Rowland, Appellant and Respondent, *v.*William J. Logan et al., Respondents and Appellants.

(Argued May 9, 1907;

decided May 28, 1907.)

*Rowland*v. *Logan,*112 App. Div. 889, affirmed.

Cross-appeals from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered March 9, 1906, affirming a judgment of Special Term in an action for an accounting between parties to a stock transaction.

*Asa A. Spear*for plaintiff, appellant and respondent.

*Augustus Van Wyoh*for William J. Logan, defendant, respondent and appellant.

*Henry Pe Hondt*for Sarah E. Blodget, as administratrix of Charles W. Blodget, deceased, defendant, respondent and appellant.

*Paul F. Lorzer*for Eranlc J. Logan, defendant, respondent and appellant.

Judgment affirmed, without costs to either party; no opinion.

Concur: Gray, O’Brien, Vann, Werner and Chase, JJ. Absent: Cullen, Ch. J. Not sitting : Willard Bartlett, J.
EXHIBIT 32.2 SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, I, Jane Morlok, Chief Financial Officer of Breda
Telephone Corp., certify that to my knowledge (i) Breda Telephone Corp.s
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Breda Telephone Corp. Date: May
  14, 2008/s/ Jane
  MorlokJane Morlok,
  Chief Financial Officer E-6
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-60105

GREEN TREE SERVICING, L.L.C.; WALTER INVESTMENT 

MANAGEMENT CORPORATION; BEST INSURORS, INCORPORATED; 

MID STATE CAPITAL, L.L.C.; MID STATE TRUST II; MID STATE TRUST 

III; MID STATE TRUST IV; MID STATE TRUST V; MID STATE TRUST VI; 

MID STATE TRUST VII; MID STATE TRUST VIII; MID STATE TRUST IX; 

MID STATE TRUST X; MID STATE TRUST XI; WILMINGTON TRUST 

COMPANY; MID-STATE CAPITAL CORPORATION 2004-1 TRUST; MIDSTATE CAPITAL CORPORATION 2005-1 TRUST; MID-STATE CAPITAL 

CORPORATION 2006-1 TRUST; MID-STATE CAPITAL TRUST 2010-1, 

 Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v.

BILLY R. BROWN, 

 Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 3:16-CV-317

Before KING, ELROD, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

This appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction based upon binding 

precedent in a virtually identical case. Green Tree Servicing, L.L.C. v. Charles, 

 

* Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be 

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R.

47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 7, 2018

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 17-60105 Document: 00514340091 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/07/2018
No. 17-60105

2

872 F.3d 637 (5th Cir. 2017); accord Green Tree Servicing, L.L.C. v. Campbell, 

701 F. App’x 383 (5th Cir. 2017) (per curiam); Green Tree Servicing, L.L.C. v. 

Mathis, 701 F. App’x 383 (5th Cir. 2017) (per curiam).

 Case: 17-60105 Document: 00514340091 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/07/2018
# EUR-Lex - 12006E063 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12006E063

**Treaty establishing the European Community (consolidated version) - Part Three - Community policies - TITLE IV - Visas, asylum, immigration and other policies related to free movement of persons - Article 63 **

*
Official Journal C 321 E , 29/12/2006 P. 0067 - 0068 Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0058 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0202 - Consolidated version *

Article 63

The Council, acting in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 67, shall, within a period of five years after the entry into force of the Treaty of Amsterdam, adopt:

1. measures on asylum, in accordance with the Geneva Convention of 28 July 1951 and the Protocol of 31 January 1967 relating to the status of refugees and other relevant treaties, within the following areas:

(a) criteria and mechanisms for determining which Member State is responsible for considering an application for asylum submitted by a national of a third country in one of the Member States;

(b) minimum standards on the reception of asylum seekers in Member States;

(c) minimum standards with respect to the qualification of nationals of third countries as refugees;

(d) minimum standards on procedures in Member States for granting or withdrawing refugee status;

2. measures on refugees and displaced persons within the following areas:

(a) minimum standards for giving temporary protection to displaced persons from third countries who cannot return to their country of origin and for persons who otherwise need international protection;

(b) promoting a balance of effort between Member States in receiving and bearing the consequences of receiving refugees and displaced persons;

3. measures on immigration policy within the following areas:

(a) conditions of entry and residence, and standards on procedures for the issue by Member States of long-term visas and residence permits, including those for the purpose of family reunion;

(b) illegal immigration and illegal residence, including repatriation of illegal residents;

4. measures defining the rights and conditions under which nationals of third countries who are legally resident in a Member State may reside in other Member States.

Measures adopted by the Council pursuant to points 3 and 4 shall not prevent any Member State from maintaining or introducing in the areas concerned national provisions which are compatible with this Treaty and with international agreements.

Measures to be adopted pursuant to points 2(b), 3(a) and 4 shall not be subject to the five-year period referred to above.

--------------------------------------------------
# EUR-Lex - 12006E046 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12006E046

**Treaty establishing the European Community (consolidated version) - Part Three - Community policies - TITLE III - Free movement of persons, services and capital - Chapter 2 - Right of establishment - Article 46 **

*
Official Journal C 321 E , 29/12/2006 P. 0061 - 0061 Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0054 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0196 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0022 - Consolidated version (EEC Treaty - no official publication available) *

Article 46

1. The provisions of this Chapter and measures taken in pursuance thereof shall not prejudice the applicability of provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action providing for special treatment for foreign nationals on grounds of public policy, public security or public health.

2. The Council shall, acting in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 251, issue directives for the coordination of the abovementioned provisions.

--------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 99.1

        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO THE 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Solely for the purposes of complying with, and the extent required by 18
U.S.C.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, each of the undersigned certifies, in his capacity as an officer of
Jupiter Enterprises, Inc. (the "Company"), that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly
Report of the Company on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2002,
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the Company's financial condition and results of
operations.


Date:  November 18, 2002                By: /s/ Steven H. Jacobson
                                        -------------------------------
                                        Steven H. Jacobson
                                        Chief Executive Officer

Date:  November 18, 2002                By: /s/ H. Douglas Saathoff
                                        -------------------------------
                                        H. Douglas Saathoff
                                        Chief Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                March 31, 2008 | /s/                JOHN F. ROUSSEAU, JR.                                                  |
|------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                     | John                F. Rousseau, Jr.                                                      |
|                                     | Chief                Operating Officer and Director                                       |
|                                     | (Principal                Executive Officer)                                              |
|                                     |                                                                                      |
| Date:                March 31, 2008 | /s/                GREGORY F. ZAIC                                                        |
|                                          | Gregory                F. Zaic                                                            |
|                                     | Treasurer                (Principal Financial and                Accounting Officer) |

----
#### Catharine Hynds, Respondent, *v.*Brooklyn Heights Railroad Company, Appellant.

(Argued April 15, 1907;

decided April 30, 1907.)

*Hynds*v. *Brooklyn Heights R. R. Co.,*111 App. Div. 339, affirmed.

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered March 8, 1906, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been received through defendant’s negligence.

*J. R. Oeland,*and *George JD. Yeomans*for appellant.

*George V. Brower*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Hiscook, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-2000
<CASH>                                         119,647
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,616
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     72,855
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               271,461
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 296,751
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           34,747
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    10,980,884
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   296,751
<SALES>                                          2,624
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  (971)
<CGS>                                           (3,595)
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              (157,930)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,014
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (157,930)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.01)




</TABLE>
Ballast Standards Schedule

Action Schedule

MIA Methodology Workshop April 28, 1998

Send out MIA survey June 11, 1998

Visit Manufacturers July 1998

Manf. Impact Analysis Available late September 1998

MIA and LCC Results Workshop late October 1998

NOPR February 1999

Public Hearing March 1999

Final Rule October 1999

EE-RM-97-500 COMMENT 21CC

Ballast Standards Schedule 

Action Schedule 

MIA Methodology Workshop April 28, 1998 

Send out MIA survey June 11, 1998 . 

Visit Manufacturers July 1998 

Manf. Impact Analysis Available late September 1998 

MIA and LCC Results Workshop late October 1998 

NOPR February 1999 

Public Hearing March 1999 

Final Rule October 1999