alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION    WASHINGTON,D.C.

VIA ELECTRONIC AND CERTIFIED MAIL 

RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED 

Saurav Ghosh & Roger G. Wieand March 5, 2024 

Campaign Legal Center 

1101 14th Street NW, Suite 400 

Washington, DC 20005 

sghosh@campaighlegalcenter.org 

rwieand@campaignlegalcenter.org 

RE: MUR 8058

Dear Messrs. Ghosh and Wieand: 

The Federal Election Commission has considered the allegations contained in your Complaint dated 

August 24, 2022, but there were an insufficient number of votes to (1) find reason to believe that Unknown 

Respondents violated 52 U.S.C. § 30122 by making a contribution in the name of another; (2) find reason to 

believe that SQI Limited, LLC, violated 52 U.S.C. § 30122 by knowingly permitting its name to be used to 

make a contribution in the name of another; (3) take no action at this time with respect to the allegation that 

Herzog Technologies, Inc., Herzog Contracting Corp., and Herzog Transit Services, Inc., violated 52 U.S.C. 

§ 30122 by making a contribution in the name of another; and (4) take no action at this time with respect to

the allegation that Save Missouri Values and Cabell Hobbs in his official capacity as treasurer violated

52 U.S.C. § 30122 by knowingly accepting a contribution in the name of another. The Commission then

voted to dismiss the Complaint in this matter. Accordingly, the Commission voted to close the file on

February 29, 2024. One or more Statements of Reasons providing a basis for the Commission’s decision

will follow.

Documents related to the case will be placed on the public record within 30 days. See Disclosure of 

Certain Documents in Enforcement and Other Matters, 81 Fed. Reg. 50,702 (Aug. 2, 2016). 

The Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended, allows a complainant to seek judicial 

review of the Commission’s dismissal of this action. See 52 U.S.C. § 30109(a)(8). If you have any 

questions, please contact Justine A. di Giovanni, the attorney assigned to this matter, at (202) 694-1574.

Sincerely,

Lisa Stevenson 

Acting General Counsel 

BY: Mark Allen 

Assistant General Counsel 

MUR805800135
#### People *ex rel.*Tuttle v. Walton.

*Summary proceedings. Set-off.*

The statutes relating to the allowance of set-off and counter-claims have no application to proceedings under the statute for the removal of tenants for non-payment of rent. They are solely applicable to actions, and to such actions only as are mentioned in the statutes.

Accordingly where it was shown that a tenant had tendered one-half of the rent due and had a claim against the landlord for an amount equal to the balance, *held,*that such tender and claim did not constitute a legal answer to the affidavit of the landlord that the rent was not paid.

Certiorari to review proceedings had before a district court justice under the statute for the summary removal of a tenant for non-payment of rent.

*534The facts appear sufficiently in the opinion.

*Thomas Stevenson,*for relator.

No appearance for respondent.

Daniels, J.

The affidavit presénted to the justice, on behalf of the landlord, in the proceedings taken before him for the removal of his tenant, for the non-payment tif rent, contained a statement of all the facts required to bring the case within the statute, and the person who made it swore positively to the fact that he was the agent of the landlord. 2 R. S. 512 (3 R. S.,5th ed. 836), §§ 28, 29. It was, within the construction of the statute adopted by the courts, sufficient to give the justice jurisdiction of the proceedings. *Cunningham*v. *Goelet,*4 Denio, 71. Dpon the affidavit the justice issued his summons, in the form prescribed, which was served upon the tenant and under tenants named in the proceedings, and upon its return day the tenant appeared and filed his own affidavit, simply controverting the fact that the rent claimed was due; and that was denied because the tenant had tendered one-half the rent before the proceedings were taken, and had an ofE-set to the other half for improvements upon the premises, which the landlord had agreed to pay, a claim of $150 for the use of the premises, which the landlord had also agreed to pay, and for certain services of the tenant and his clerks. The justice held that this did not contain a legal answer to the application made by the landlord, and in that he was clearly right, for the affidavit, so far as it depended upon the off-set, in substance admitted-that the rent was due and unpaid. As long as the demands mentioned in the tenant’s affidavit were unapplied to the rent due, both they and .the rent were entirely separate and independent demands. The statutes relating to the allowance of off-sets and counter-claims have no application to the proceedings provided for the removal of tenants for the non-payment of rent. They are solely applicable to actions, and to such actions only as are mentioned in the statutes. 2 R. S. 234 (3 R. S. 5th ed. 434,435), § 48, subd. 5; id. 354, § 18 (5th ed. 634, 635, § 12), subd. 5 ; Code, §150.

The determination of the justice was correct, and the proceedings should be affirmed, with costs.

Davis, P.'J., and Donohue, J., concurred.

*Proceedings affirmed.*
COURT OF APPEALS.

#### Benjamin F. Tabor, appellant, agt. Noah H. Gardner, and others, respondents.

An order of the general term of the court below *reversing*an order of the special term, striking out a part of the answer of the defendant, on the ground that the same was not sufficiently verified, is *not appealable to this cowrt.*

Such an order Js in substance and actual effect, one refusing to strike out a part of the answer; and neither before the amendment of the Code in 1869, nor since, did any clause of section 11, defining the jurisdiction of this court, embrace such an order.

*September*term, 1869.

*By the*court, Woodruff, J.

In this action, an order was made in the superior court, of the city of Buffalo, striking out a part of the answer of the defendant, on the ground that the same was not sufficiently verified. That order was reversed by the general term of the same court, and it is from the determination of the general term that the plaintiff has appealed, and from that only could he appeal to this court.

The appeal is, therefere, not from an order striking out an answer, or part of an anwer, but from an order in substance and in actual effect refusing to. strike out.

From such an order no appeal lies to this court. Neither before the amendment of 1869, nor since, did any clause of section eleven of the Code, defining our jurisdiction, embrace such an order. The last clause of subdivision four of that section, has been frequently misunderstood, but has been again and again held by this court, to regulate the hearing of appeals from orders, of which this court had jurisdiction, *384by' power of the preceding subdivisions and clauses of the section, and not to extend that jurisdiction to other orders not previously named.

The appeal must be dismissed, with costs.

All the judges concurring, appeal dismissed.

Lyman E. Bass, *for the appellant.*

George Wadsworth,, *for the respondent.*
SCHEDULE D-1 

(Form 1040)

Department of the Treasury 

Internal Revenue Service (99) 

Continuation Sheet for Schedule D 

(Form 1040)

▶ See instructions for Schedule D (Form 1040).

▶ Attach to Schedule D to list additional transactions for lines 1 and 8.

OMB No. 1545-0074

2010

Attachment 

Sequence No. 12A

Name(s) shown on return Your social security number

Part I Short-Term Capital Gains and Losses—Assets Held One Year or Less

(a) Description of property 

(Example: 100 sh. XYZ Co.)

(b) Date 

acquired 

(Mo., day, yr.)

(c) Date sold 

(Mo., day, yr.)

(d) Sales price 

(see page D-7 of the

instructions)

(e) Cost or other basis 

(see page D-7 of the

instructions)

(f) Gain or (loss) 

Subtract (e) from (d)

1

2 Totals. Add the amounts in column (d). Also, combine the

amounts in column (f). Enter here and on Schedule D, line 2 ▶ 2

For Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see your tax return instructions. Cat. No. 10424K Schedule D-1 (Form 1040) 2010
Schedule D-1 (Form 1040) 2010 Attachment Sequence No. 12A Page 2

Name(s) shown on return. Do not enter name and social security number if shown on other side. Your social security number

Part II Long-Term Capital Gains and Losses—Assets Held More Than One Year

(a) Description of property 

(Example: 100 sh. XYZ Co.)

(b) Date 

acquired 

(Mo., day, yr.)

(c) Date sold 

(Mo., day, yr.)

(d) Sales price 

(see page D-7 of the

instructions)

(e) Cost or other basis 

(see page D-7 of the

instructions)

(f) Gain or (loss) 

Subtract (e) from (d)

8

9 Totals. Add the amounts in column (d). Also, combine the

amounts in column (f). Enter here and on Schedule D, line 9 ▶ 9

Schedule D-1 (Form 1040) 2010
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 83 (Thursday, April 30, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24310-24311]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-10139]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 9116]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``FRIDA KAHLO: Art, Garden, Life'' Exhibition

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following Determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 
of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 
257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``FRIDA KAHLO: Art, Garden, Life,'' imported 
from abroad for temporary exhibition

[[Page 24311]]

within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are 
imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or 
custodians. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the 
exhibit objects at The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, New York, from 
on or about May 16, 2015, until on or about November 1, 2015, and at 
possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in 
the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these 
Determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact the Office of Public Diplomacy and 
Public Affairs in the Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of 
State (telephone: 202-632-6471; email: section2459@state.gov). The 
mailing address is U.S. Department of State, L/PD, SA-5, Suite 5H03, 
Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: April 20, 2015.
Kelly Keiderling,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2015-10139 Filed 4-29-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
Total U.S. Exports to  Albania

Data in Thousand Dollars 

Data For  JUN. 1999

|Group                 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | Year to Date 6/1998 | Year to Date 6/1999 | % Change | Year Ending 6/1998 | Year Ending 6/1999 | % Change | % Share
|--------------------- | ---- | ---- | ---- | ---- | ------------------- | ------------------- | -------- | ------------------ | ------------------ | -------- | -------
|TEXTILES & APPAREL    | 102  | 35   | 27   | 465  | 425                 | 274                 | -35.7    | 449                | 313                | -30.1    | 0      
|TEXTILE MILL PRODUCTS | 62   | 25   | 4    | 33   | 0                   | 227                 |          | 0                  | 260                |          | 0      
|Fabric                | 15   | 0    | 0    | 9    | 0                   | 222                 |          | 0                  | 231                |          | 0      
|Wool Woven Fabrics    |      |      | 0    | 0    | 0                   | 210                 |          | 0                  | 210                |          | 0.27
# EUR-Lex - 12005SPN05/APP - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12005SPN05/APP

**Protocol concerning the conditions and arrangements for admission of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania to the European Union - Appendix to Annex V **

*
Official Journal L 157 , 21/06/2005 P. 0103 - 0103 *

Appendix to Annex V

List of existing aid measures referred to in point 1(b) of the existing aid mechanism provided for in Chapter 2 of Annex V

Note: The aid measures listed in this Appendix are only to be considered as existing aid for the purpose of the existing aid mechanism set out in Chapter 2 of Annex V to the extent that they fall within the scope of its first paragraph.

No | Title (original) | Date of approval by national State aid monitoring authority | Duration |

MS | Nr | Yr |

BG | 1 | 2004 | Предоговаряне на задълженията към държавата, възникнали по реда на Закона за уреждане на необслужваните кредити, договорени до 31.12.1990 г. със "Силома" АД, гр.Силистра, чрез удължаване на срока на изплащане на главницата за срок от 15 години | 29.7.2004 | 2004-2018 |

BG | 2 | 2004 | Средства за компенсиране от държавния бюджет на доказания от "Български пощи" ЕАД дефицит от изпълнението на универсалната пощенска услуга | 18.11.2004 | 31.12.2010 |

BG | 3 | 2004 | Целево финансиране на дейността на Българската телеграфна агенция- направление "Информационно обслужване" | 16.12.2003 | 31.12.2010 |

--------------------------------------------------
<PAGE>   1
                                                                 EXHIBIT 10.2(b)

                AMENDMENT TO THE CENTRAL PARKING CORPORATION 1995
                  NONQUALIFIED STOCK OPTION PLAN FOR DIRECTORS

         The Central Parking Corporation 1995 Nonqualified Stock
Option Plan for Directors (the "Plan") is hereby amended by deleting Section 3
of the plan in its entirety and replacing such section with the following:

         3.       Stock Subject to the Plan. There will be reserved for issuance
         upon exercise of Options 475,000 shares of Common Stock, which will be
         authorized and unissued Common Stock. If an Option expires or
         terminates for any reason without being exercised in full, the shares
         subject thereto which have not been purchased will again be available
         for purposes of the Plan. The number of shares as to which Options may
         be granted under the Plan will be proportionately adjusted, to the
         nearest whole share, in the event of any stock dividend, stock split,
         share combination or similar recapitalization involving the Common
         Stock, any merger, consolidation or reorganization, or any spin-off,
         spin-out or other significant distribution of assets of stockholders
         for which the Corporation receives no consideration. In the event that
         there is an insufficient number of authorized shares of Common Stock
         available to allow exercise of the Options on the date of any grant
         hereunder, such Options will not be exercisable until there are
         sufficient shares of Common Stock authorized for issuance.
§ 13.160 Use of cabins for subsistence purposes. ( a ) A local rural resident who is an eligible subsistence user may use an existing cabin or other structure or temporary facility or construct a new cabin or other structure, including temporary facilities, in a portion of a park area where subsistence use is allowed, pursuant to the applicable provisions of subparts F through V of this part and the terms of a permit issued by the Superintendent. However, the Superintendent may designate existing cabins or other structures that may be shared by local rural residents for authorized subsistence uses without a permit.
( b ) For purposes of this section, the term “local rural resident”, with respect to national parks, monuments, and preserve, is defined in § 13.420 of this chapter.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. George R. Adams, Appellant, *v.*Jacob F. Stoll et al., as Assessors of the Town of Rosendale, Respondents.

(Argued April 2, 1907;

decided April 16, 1907.)

*People ex rel. Adams*v. *Stoll,*117 App. Div. 914, affirmed.

Appeal from an order of the Appellate • Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered February *i,*1907, which affirmed two orders of Special Temí, one dismissing a writ of certiorari and the other denying a motion to strike from tile assessment roll of the town of Rosendale certain assessments against relator’s real property.

*George R. Adams*appellant in person.

*Howard Chipp*and *Jolm E. Hardenbxtrg*for respondents.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion,

i Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., O’Brien, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Hiscock and Chase, JJ,
Exhibit
31.1


Certification
of Principal Executive Officer


I, Seth
Grae, certify that:





1.                    I
have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Thorium Power,
Ltd.;





2.                    Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.                    Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;





4.                    The
registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:





a.           Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;





b.           Evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and





c.           Disclosed
in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting.





5.                    The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





a.           All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and





b.           Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.





Date: May
12, 2009





/s/ Seth GraeSeth
      Grae, Principal Executive
Officer
§ 220.1 Purpose and scope. ( a ) *Purpose.* This part establishes Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) procedures for compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 *et seq.*) and the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) regulations for implementing the procedural provisions of NEPA (40 CFR parts 1500 through 1508).
( b ) *Scope.* This part supplements and does not lessen the applicability of the CEQ regulations, and is to be used in conjunction with the CEQ regulations and USDA regulations at 7 CFR part 1b.
§ 9.81 May I use previously submitted information? ( a ) In satisfying the requirements of §§ 9.82 through 9.90, you do not need to resubmit information that is already on file with the NPS. Instead, you may reference the previously submitted information in your permit application.
( b ) You may submit documents and materials containing the information required by §§ 9.82 through 9.90 that you submit to other Federal and State agencies. If you do this, you must clearly identify the information required by §§ 9.82 through 9.90.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 736 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 736

To establish the Chiricahua National Park in the State of Arizona as a 
       unit of the National Park System, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 9, 2023

 Mr. Kelly (for himself and Ms. Sinema) introduced the following bill; 
   which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To establish the Chiricahua National Park in the State of Arizona as a 
       unit of the National Park System, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Chiricahua National Park Act''.

SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF CHIRICAHUA NATIONAL PARK, ARIZONA.

    (a) Designation.--
            (1) In general.--The Chiricahua National Monument in the 
        State of Arizona established by Presidential Proclamation 1692 
        (54 U.S.C. 320301 note; 43 Stat. 1946) shall be known and 
        designated as ``Chiricahua National Park'' (referred to in this 
        Act as the ``National Park'').
            (2) Boundaries.--The boundaries of the National Park shall 
        be the boundaries of the Chiricahua National Monument as of the 
        date of enactment of this Act, as generally depicted on the map 
        entitled ``Chiricahua National Park Proposed Boundary'', 
        numbered 145/156,356, and dated March 2021.
            (3) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 
        document, or other record of the United States to the 
        Chiricahua National Monument shall be considered to be a 
        reference to the ``Chiricahua National Park''.
            (4) Availability of funds.--Any funds available for the 
        Chiricahua National Monument shall be available for the 
        National Park.
    (b) Administration.--The Secretary of the Interior shall administer 
the National Park in accordance with--
            (1) Presidential Proclamation 1692 (54 U.S.C. 320301 note; 
        43 Stat. 1946);
            (2) Presidential Proclamation 2288 (54 U.S.C. 320301 note; 
        52 Stat. 1551); and
            (3) the laws generally applicable to units of the National 
        Park System, including--
                    (A) section 100101(a), chapter 1003, and sections 
                100751(a), 100752, 100753, and 102101 of title 54, 
                United States Code; and
                    (B) chapter 3201 of title 54, United States Code.
                                 <all>
```