alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

MEMORANDUM

TO:   Docket for Navajo Generating Station: EPA‐R09‐OAR‐2013‐0009

FROM: Anita Lee, EPA Region 9

DATE: September 5, 2013

RE: Consultation Meeting on August 28, 2013 with Navajo Nation

Participants:

Navajo Nation

 President Ben Shelly

 Michele Morris, Office of the President and Vice President

 Sharilene Jeff, Office of the President and Vice President

 Harrison Tsosie, Navajo Nation Department of Justice  

 Toni Flora, Navajo Nation Department of Justice

 Stephen Etsitty, Navajo Nation EPA

 Eugenia Quintana, Navajo Nation EPA, Air and Toxics Dept.

 Raju Bisht, Navajo Nation EPA, Operating Permits Program

EPA Region 9

 Jared Blumenfeld, Regional Administrator

 Deborah Jordan, Air Division

 Colleen McKaughan, Air Division (by phone)

 Anita Lee, Air Planning Office

 Ann Lyons, Office of Regional Counsel

 Zoe Heller, Office of the Regional Administrator

 Pamela Overman, Tribal Programs Office

Letty Belin, Department of the Interior

David Palumbo, Bureau of Reclamation

Location:

 EPA Region 9 Office in San Francisco, CA

Summary:

 President Shelly and his staff discussed many issues, including:

o The Nation’s interest in supporting the continued use and sale of coal mined on Navajo Nation

o Economy of Navajo Nation as a result of federal policies; overwhelming regulatory burden

o Changing legal environment is necessary (e.g., Indian Citizenship Act)

o Recommendations that EPA consider overall costs of regulatory actions; study impact of

Mohave Generating Station closure on visibility; examine improvements from other facilities;

conduct a health study to determine if power plants adversely affect public health; conduct a

new 5‐factor BART analysis that accounts for new information provided to EPA (copy of lease

amendment and ASU study); determine that LNB/SOFA is BART for NGS; consider cumulative

effects on the Navajo nation of separate actions (i.e., NGS, Four Corners Power Plant, and San
2

Juan Generating Station); concerns about BART, timeline for BART  and whether it will result in

visibility improvement.

o Consider that under TWG Alternative, with closure or curtailment of one unit at NGS, the Navajo

Nation expects to lose $11 million per year from 2019‐2044; lease payment is $43 million per

year under the new lease for all three units.  

Presentation Materials Received (attached):

 Letter to Jared Blumenfeld

 Copy of Lease Amendment for NGS

 ASU Economic Impact Study  

 Also attached – sign in sheet
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Aaron Cuthbert Moona, Appellant

No. 06

- 16

- 00132

- CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 2 of Tarrant County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No.

1444745D ). Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice Moseley, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of thi s date, we find that the motion of the appellant to

dismiss the appeal should be granted. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal.

We note that the appellant, Aaron Cuthbert Moona, has adequately indicated his inability

to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED OCTOBER 26, 2016

BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. §1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  DATE:                May 15, 2008 |  /s/                Steven van der Velden                     |
|-----------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                    | Steven                van der Velden                               |
|                                    | President                andChief                Executive Officer |

*A      signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been      provided to Elephant Talk Communications, Inc. and will be retained by Elephant      Talk Communications, Inc and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission      or its staff upon request.*

----
#### § 183.75 Applicability.

Manufacturers of vessels to which this subpart applies must use test weights that are not less than the recommended weights set forth in Table [183.75](/on/2024-09-23/title-33/section-183.75). Table [183.75](/on/2024-09-23/title-33/section-183.75) details the weight (in pounds) of gasoline outboard engines and related equipment for various rated power (horsepower) ranges.

Table [183.75](/on/2024-09-23/title-33/section-183.75)—Weights (In Pounds) of Gasoline Outboard Engines and Related Equipment for Various Rated Power (Horsepower) Ranges

| Single engine installations | | | | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Column number | | | | | | | | |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
| Engine power range (Horsepower) | Dry weight12 | Running weight3 | Swamped weight4 | Controls & rigging5 | Battery weight, dry | Battery weight submerged | Full portable fuel tank6 | Total weight (Sum of columns 3,5,6,8) |
| 0.1-2.0 | 30 | 32 | 27 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 32 |
| 2.1-3.9 | 42 | 44 | 37 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 44 |
| 4.0-6.9 | 66 | 69 | 59 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 94 |
| 7.0-10.9 | 105 | 110 | 94 | 5 | 20 | 11 | 50 | 185 |
| 11.0-22.9 | 127 | 133 | 113 | 6 | 45 | 25 | 50 | 234 |
| 23.0-34.9 | 187 | 196 | 167 | 9 | 45 | 25 | 100 | 350 |
| 35.0-64.9 | 286 | 300 | 255 | 14 | 45 | 25 | 100 | 459 |
| 65.0-94.9 | 439 | 461 | 392 | 22 | 45 | 25 | 100 | 628 |
| 95.0-104.9 | 458 | 481 | 409 | 23 | 45 | 25 | 100 | 649 |
| 105.0-144.9 | 526 | 552 | 469 | 26 | 45 | 25 | 100 | 723 |
| 145.0-194.9 | 561 | 589 | 501 | 28 | 45 | 25 | 100 | 762 |
| 195.0-209.9 | 652 | 685 | 582 | 33 | 45 | 25 | 100 | 863 |
| 210.0-300.0 | 699 | 734 | 624 | 35 | 45 | 25 | 100 | 914 |
| 300.1-350.0 | 884 | 928 | 789 | 44 | 45 | 25 | 100 | 1,117 |
| | | | | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| **Notes:** | | | | | | | | |
| 1 Dry weight is the manufacturer's published weight for the shortest midsection increased by 10 percent to account for longer midsections and additional required hardware usually not included in published weights. This weight is intended to represent the heaviest model in each power category. For boats designed with a transom height of 20 inches or less, the weight in Column 2 may be reduced by 10 percent. Recalculate Columns 3, 4, and 9 as appropriate. | | | | | | | | |
| 2 For diesel outboards, replace the value in Column 2 with the manufacturer's published dry weight + 10 percent. | | | | | | | | |
| 3 Running weight is the dry weight plus fluids (including 2-stroke oil) and the heaviest recommended propeller. Calculated as 5 percent of dry weight. | | | | | | | | |
| 4 Swamped weight is 85 percent of running weight. | | | | | | | | |
| 5 Rigging and controls include engine related hardware required to complete the installation (e.g., controls, cables, hydraulic hoses, steering pumps and cylinders). Calculated as 5 percent of dry weight. | | | | | | | | |
| 6 If the boat is equipped with a permanent fuel system and is not intended to use a portable tank, the portable fuel tank weight may be omitted. | | | | | | | | |
§ 331.13 Vessels. ( a ) Vessels or other watercraft may be operated in the WCA waters except in prohibited or restricted areas in accordance with posted regulations and applicable Federal, State and local laws.
( b ) All vessels when not in actual use shall be removed from the WCA unless securely moored at mooring facilities approved by the District Engineer. The placing of floating or stationary mooring facilities to, or interfering with, a buoy, channel marker, or other navigational aid is prohibited.
( c ) The operation of vessels or other watercraft in a careless, negligent, or reckless manner so as to endanger any property (including the operator and/or user(s) of the vessel or watercraft) is prohibited.
§ 1258.10 How does NARA develop and publicize new records reproduction fees? ( a ) Custodial units prepare a justification proposal for a proposed records reproduction service and send the justification to the custodial unit office head, through appropriate channels, for concurrence and forwarding to NATF. The justification proposal includes, at a minimum, the following information: ( 1 ) Estimated monthly volume of product orders based on available historical data;
( 2 ) Identification of the equipment and supplies required to provide the product and service;
( 3 ) Brief description of the process required to provide the product and service, including the amount of time for each number and grade level of staff.
( 4 ) Identification of any services or products that will be replaced by the proposed products and services;
( 5 ) Identification of other NARA units that may have a demand for the proposed services; and
( 6 ) Any other relevant information.
( b ) After receiving the proposal, NATF staff: ( 1 ) Assesses the potential customer base for the proposed products and services, consulting other NARA offices.
( 2 ) If the potential demand does not warrant establishing fees for new records reproduction products and services, NATF notifies the proposing office that the new product and service are not approved and the reasons why.
( 3 ) If the potential demand warrants, NATF prepares a cost analysis following the methodology in § 1258.6 and develops a proposed recommended fee for review by NARA's Financial Resources Division and approval by the Archivist of the United States.
( c ) *Notification of new records reproduction services and trial periods:* ( 1 ) The public will be notified of new records reproduction services, including the business case for determining initial fee, on-line at *http://www.archives.gov ,* by press releases, and through NARA's social media outlets.
( 2 ) New records reproduction services fees have an initial trial period of one year. During this time, the public is encouraged to provide feedback to NARA about the new records reproduction services and their fees as directed in the notification of the new services.
( 3 ) Prior to the expiration of a trial period, NATF will assess the validity of the fees for the new records reproduction products and services, and make one of three determinations: ( i ) Retain products, services and fees;
( ii ) Retain products or services but adjust fees up or down; or
( iii ) Discontinue products or services.
( d ) The public will be notified of NATF determination, including business case for determination, in NARA research rooms nationwide, on-line at *http://www.archives.gov ,* press releases, and through NARA's social media outlets.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Celtron International, Inc. on  Form  10QSB  for  the  period  ending  September 30, 2005,  as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report'),  I, Allen Harington,  Chief  Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to  18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as  adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)   The information contained  in  the  Report  fairly presents, in all material  respects,  the financial condition and result of  operations  of  the Company.







/s/ Allen Harington

_____________________

Allen Harington

Chief Executive Officer

Date: November 12, 2005
EXHIBIT
31.2





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO


SECTION
302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Jason Smart, certify
that:





1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Makeover Corporation of
America;





2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;





3.  Based  on
my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;





4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer  and  I  are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and we have:





a.  designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or
caused  such disclosure  controls and  procedures
to be designed  under our  supervision,  to ensure
that  material  information  relating to
the  registrant,  including  its consolidated
subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;


b.
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions  about the
effectiveness of the disclosure  controls and
procedures,  as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly
report based on such evaluation; and


c.
disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over  financial  reporting  that
occurred  during the  registrant's  most recent
fiscal  quarter  that  has  materially  affected,  or
is  reasonably  likely  to materially affect, the
registrant's  internal control over financial  reporting;
and





5. I
have  disclosed,  based on our most
recent  evaluation of internal  control over financial
reporting,  to the registrant's  auditors and the audit
committee of the  registrant's  board of directors (or
persons  performing  the equivalent functions):





a.
all significant  deficiencies  and
material  weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal  control
over  financial  reporting,  which are reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and


b.
any fraud,  whether or not material,  that
involves  management or other employees who have a significant role in
the registrant's  internal control over financial
reporting.





Date:
November 12, 2009





/s/
Jason Smart


Jason
Smart


Chief
Accounting Officer
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. The Travelers’ Insurance Company, Appellant, *v.*Otto Kelsey, as Comptroller of the State of New York, Respondent.

(Argued February 18, 1907;

decided March 5, 1907.)

*People ex rel. Travelers’ Ins. Co.*v. *Kelsey,*116 App. Div. 910, affirmed.

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme. Court in the third judicial department, entered November 19, 1906, which confirmed a determination of the defendant in auditing and stating a state tax against the relator for the privilege of carrying on its business within the state.

*David B. Hill, Andrew Hamilton*and *Neile F. Towner*for appellant.

*William S. Jackson, Attorney-General (George P. Decker*of counsel), for respondent.

Order aifirmed, with costs ; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Cray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Werner and Chase, JJ.
Chang G. Park, CPA, Ph. D.t
 371 E STREET t
 CHULA VISTA t
 CALIFORNIA 91910-2615t
t
 TELEPHONE (858) 722-5953 t
 FAX (858) 408-2695  t
 FAX (619) 422-1465t
 E-MAIL











To Whom It May Concern:







The firm of Chang G. Park, CPA, Certified Public Accountant,  consents to the inclusion of our report of October 11,  2006, on the reviewed  financial statements of WorldTradeShow.com, Inc. as of July 31, 2006, in any filings that are necessary now or in the near future with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.



Very truly yours,







/s/ Chang G. Park, CPA

Chula Vista, CA  91910
October 11, 2006



Member of the California Society of Certified Public Accountants
Registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
Exhibit 12.1
 Statement Regarding the Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
(in thousands, except ratios)
 Year Ended 9/30/10
    
    
    Year Ended 9/30/09
    
    
    Year Ended 9/30/08
    
    
    Year Ended 9/30/07
    
    
    Year Ended 9/30/06Pre-tax Income Loss from Continuing Operations
    
    $
    (41,716
    )
    
    $
    (52
    )
    
    $
    (59,412
    )
    
    $
    (97,038
    )
    
    $
    (40,838
    )Fixed Charges:Interest expense
    
    
    14,235
    
    
    
    14,099
    
    
    
    7,894
    
    
    
    4,601
    
    
    
    3,328Capitalized interest expense
    
    
    2,907
    
    
    
    2,160
    
    
    
    907
    
    
    
    798
    
    
    
    30Amortization of discounts and issuance costs related to indebtedness (included in interest
expense)
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Rental expenses representative of an interest factor
    
    
    98
    
    
    
    82
    
    
    
    87
    
    
    
    67
    
    
    
    40Total Fixed Charges
    
    
    17,240
    
    
    
    16,341
    
    
    
    8,888
    
    
    
    5,466
    
    
    
    3,398Earnings:Pre-tax Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations adjusted plus fixed charges
    
    $
    (24,476
    )
    
    $
    16,393
    
    
    $
    (50,524
    )
    
    $
    (91,572
    )
    
    $
    (37,440
    )Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
    
    nm
    
    
    
    1.0
    
    
    nm
    
    
    nm
    
    
    nm
~ruutr nf tqr luitr~ ~tutts NINETIETH CONGRESS 

FIRST SESSION {Co~vened January IO, 1967 

AdJourned December r;, 1967 

SECOND SESSION {Convened January 15, rg68 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Prepared under the direction of FRANCIS R. VALEO, Secretary of the Senate 

By GERALD A. HACKETT, Executive Clerk 

Monday, May 6, 1968 

NOMINATIONS 

Date o! Calendar Messago Name of nommee Office Predecessor 

report No. No. 

DEPARTMENT OF 

HEALTH, EDUCATION, 

AND WELFARE 

1968 

May 3 293 7 4 Wilbur J. Cohen, of Michi- SecretD,ry of Health, Edu3 294 36 

3 295 59-1 

3 296 59-2 

3 297 59-3 

3 298 59-4 

85-022-68-No. 150 

gan. cation, and Welfare. 

DEPARTMENT OF THE 

TREASURY 

John R Potty, of New 

York. 

TAX COURT OF THE 

UNITED STATES 

William lVI. Drennen, of 

West Virginia. 

William M. Fay, of 

Pennsylvania. 

C. Moxley Featherston, of 

Virginia. 

Charles R. Simpson, of 

Illinois. 

An Assistant Secretary of 

the Treasury. 

Winthrop Knowlton. 

A Judge of theTa' Court of Hcappointment. 

the United StD,tes for the 

term of 12 years from 

June 2, 1968. _____ do___________________ Do. 

_____ do___________________ Do. 

_____ do ________ _____ ------ Do. 

I S GOt.'EfHI/II:NT PRINTING OFFICE 1958
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


                       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
                      SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies that:

         1.       The Annual Report on Form 10-K of SPSS Inc. for the period
                  ended December 31, 2003, as amended by this Amendment No. 1 to
                  Annual Report on Form 10-K, as filed with the Securities and
                  Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), fully
                  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of SPSS Inc.



Date:    August 6, 2004                      By:  /s/ Jack Noonan
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Jack Noonan
                                                  President and Chief Executive
                                                  Officer
§ 13.1902 Subsistence. ( a ) *Subsistence resident zone communities.* The following communities and areas are included within the resident zone for Wrangell-St. Elias National Park: Chisana, Chistochina, Chitina, Copper Center, Dot Lake, Gakona, Gakona Junction, Glennallen, Gulkana, Healy Lake, Kenny Lake, Lower Tonsina, McCarthy, Mentasta Lake, Nabesna, Northway/Northway Village/Northway Junction, Slana, Tanacross, Tazlina, Tetlin, Tok, Tonsina, and Yakutat.
( b ) *Subsistence resident zone boundaries.* Boundaries for communities and areas added to the park resident zone will be determined by the Superintendent after consultation with the affected area or community. If the Superintendent and community are not able to agree on a boundary within two years, the boundary of the area or community added will be the boundary of the Census Designated Place, or other area designation, used by the Alaska Department of Labor for census purposes for that community or area. Copies of the boundary map will be available in the park headquarters office.
( c ) *Subsistence aircraft exemption.* In extraordinary cases where no reasonable alternative exists local rural residents who permanently reside in the following exempted community(ies) may use aircraft for access to lands and waters within the park for subsistence purposes in accordance with a permit issued by the Superintendent: Yakutat (for access to the Malaspina Forelands Area only).
( d ) *Use of bait for taking bears.* ( 1 ) The superintendent may issue individual, annual permits allowing the use of human-produced food items as bait for taking bears upon a finding that: ( i ) Such use is compatible with the purposes and values for which the area was established (e.g. does not create a user conflict); and
( ii ) The permit applicant does not have reasonable access to natural bait that may be used under § 13.480(b)(1).
( 2 ) Permits will identify specific locations within the park area where the bait station may be established and will not include areas where the use of such materials could create a user conflict.
[71 FR 69333, Nov. 30, 2006, as amended at 82 FR 3633, Jan. 12, 2017]