COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: R. T. Hardge v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01-15-00815-CR

Trial court case number: 1223224

Trial court: 180th District Court of Harris County

A jury convicted appellant, R. T. Hardge, of capital murder and the trial court 

assesses his punishment at confinement for life. On February 6, 2014, the trial court 

appointed Tanya Rolland to represent appellant for the purpose of post-conviction DNA 

testing. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 64.01(c) (West Supp. 2015). On July 10, 

2015, the trial court granted the State’s motion to deny DNA testing and signed findings 

of fact and conclusions of law, which include a finding that “the trial court appointed 

defense counsel, Tonya Rolland, to represent [appellant] for the purpose of his motion.”

The clerk’s record filed in this Court contains no indication that appellant’s appointed 

counsel moved to withdraw or that the trial court permitted her to withdraw. 

Nevertheless, appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal and no attorney has appeared in 

this Court on appellant’s behalf.

Accordingly, we abate this appeal and remand the cause to the trial court for 

further proceedings. On remand, the trial court shall immediately conduct a hearing at 

which a representative of the Harris County District Attorney’s Office and appellant’s 

appointed counsel, Tanya Rolland, shall be present. Appellant also shall be present for 

the hearing in person or, if appellant is incarcerated, at the trial court’s discretion, 

appellant may participate in the hearing by use of a closed-circuit video 

teleconferencing.1

 

1 Any teleconference must use a closed-circuit video teleconferencing system that provides 

for a simultaneous compressed full motion video and interactive communication of image 

and sound among the trial court, appellant, and any attorneys representing the State or 

appellant. On his request, appellant and his counsel shall be able to communicate 

privately without being recorded or heard by the trial court or the State’s attorney.
We direct the trial court to make appropriate written findings of fact and 

conclusions of law and sign any necessary orders on these issues:

1) Determine whether appellant wishes to pursue this appeal; 

2) If appellant wishes to pursue this appeal, determine whether appellant’s 

counsel, Tanya Rolland, intends to represent appellant on appeal or whether 

counsel should be permitted to withdraw;

3) If counsel is permitted to withdraw, enter a written order granting her

request to withdraw and appoint substitute counsel at no expense to 

appellant;

4) If appellant wishes to pursue this appeal, order the court reporter to prepare 

and file with this Court the proceedings from the hearing on the motion for 

DNA testing without charge to appellant;

5) Make any other findings and recommendations the trial court deems 

appropriate; and

6) Enter written findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations as 

to these issues, separate and apart from any docket sheet notations.

See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 26.04(p); 64.01(c) (West Supp. 2015); Ex parte 

Gutierrez, 337 S.W.3d 883, 889 (Tex. Crim. App. 2011); Gutierrez v. State, 307 S.W.3d 

318, 321, 322 (Tex. Crim. App. 2010); see also Ward v. State, 740 S.W.2d 794, 798

(Tex. Crim. App. 1972) (requiring, after permitting appointed counsel to withdraw, trial 

court must either find appellant knowingly and voluntarily waived right to appointed 

counsel or appoint counsel); Fowler v. State, 874 S.W.2d 112, 114 (Tex. App.—Austin 

1994, pet. ref’d) (order) (“When a trial court permits appointed counsel to withdraw, that 

court must appoint substitute counsel in the absence of a clear showing in the record that 

the defendant is no longer indigent or that the defendant desires to represent himself.”).

The trial court shall have a court reporter record the hearing. The trial court clerk 

is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s record containing the trial court’s findings, 

recommendations, and orders with this Court within 30 days of the date of this order. 

The court reporter is directed to file the reporter’s record of the hearing within 30 days of 

the date of this order. If the hearing is conducted by video teleconference, a certified 

recording of the hearing shall also be filed in this Court within 30 days of the date of this 

order.

The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this Court’s 

active docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this Court’s active docket when records 

that comply with our order are filed with the Clerk of this Court. The court coordinator

of the trial court shall set a hearing date and notify the parties.
It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Russell Lloyd

  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: December 17, 2015