58044 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 190 / Monday, October 2, 2006 / Notices 

Direct Payment Information, to obtain 

the representative’s SSN and other 

information we need to issue Forms 

1099–MISC. We published a Federal 

Register notice of our intent to establish 

both the SSA–1699 and the SSA–1695, 

which is discussed below. See 71 FR 

38681–38683, July 7, 2006. 

The one-time submission of the SSA–

1699 is the first step in a two-step 

registration process that a representative 

must complete in order to receive direct 

fee payment in a specific claim. We are 

providing an electronic means by which 

representatives may complete and 

submit the SSA–1699 via our Internet 

Web site. The second step requires that 

a representative provide SSA with his or 

her SSN in each instance of 

representation (i.e., each time the 

representative is appointed to represent 

a claimant before SSA or, if an attorney 

did not register when the claim was 

pending before the Commissioner, each 

time a Federal court approves a fee) by 

submitting the Form SSA–1695, 

Identifying Information for Possible 

Direct Payment of Authorized Fees. The 

first step in the registration process, the 

one-time submission of the SSA–1699, 

begins with publication of this notice. 

The second step, submission of the 

SSA–1695, will begin in November of 

2006. We will provide further 

information about the required forms, 

and the application developed to enable 

completion and submission of the SSA–

1699 electronically via the Internet, on 

the Representing Claimants Web site on 

Social Security Online (http:// 

www.socialsecurity.gov/representation). 

If a representative does not provide 

SSA with his or her SSN by completing 

both steps in the registration process as 

described above, SSA will not make 

direct fee payment to the representative, 

even if the representative is an attorney 

or a participant in the non-attorney 

direct payment demonstration project. 

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance 

Program Nos. 96.001, Social Security—

Disability Insurance; 96.002, Social 

Security—Retirement Insurance; 96.004, 

Social Security—Survivors Insurance; and 

96.006, Supplemental Security Income) 

Dated: September 15, 2006. 

Dale W. Sopper, 

Deputy Commissioner, for Budget, Finance 

and Management. 

[FR Doc. E6–16096 Filed 9–29–06; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4191–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

[Public Notice 5552] 

Notice of Meeting of the Cultural 

Property Advisory Committee 

In accordance with the provisions of 

the Convention on Cultural Property 

Implementation Act (19 U.S.C. 2601 et 

seq.) (the Act) there will be a meeting of 

the Cultural Property Advisory 

Committee on Wednesday, October 11, 

2006, from approximately 9 a.m. to 5 

p.m., and on Thursday, October 12, 

from approximately 9 a.m. to 1 p.m., at 

the Department of State, Annex 44, 

Room 840, 301 4th St., SW., 

Washington, DC. At this meeting, the 

Committee will conduct its ongoing 

review function with respect to the 

Memorandum of Understanding 

Between the Government of the United 

States of America and the Government 

of the Republic of Guatemala 

Concerning the Imposition of Import 

Restrictions on Archaeological Objects 

and Materials from the Pre-Columbian 

Cultures of Guatemala; and, with 

respect to the Memorandum of 

Understanding with the Government of 

the Republic of Mali Concerning the 

Imposition of Import Restrictions on 

Archaeological Material from the Region 

of the Niger River Valley and the 

Bandiagara Escarpment (Cliff). This 

meeting is for the Committee to satisfy 

its ongoing review responsibility of 

agreements pursuant to the Act. It will 

focus its attention on Article II of the 

MOUs. This is not a meeting to consider 

extension of the MOUs. Such a meeting 

or meetings will be scheduled in the 

future and at that time a public session 

will be held. 

The Committee’s responsibilities are 

carried out in accordance with 

provisions of the Convention on 

Cultural Property Implementation Act 

(19 U.S.C. 2601 et seq.). The U.S.—

Guatemala MOU, the U.S.— Mali MOU, 

the designated lists of restricted 

categories, the text of the Act, and 

related information may be found at 

http://exchanges.state.gov/culprop. 

The meeting on October 11–12, will 

be closed pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 

552b(c)(9)(B) and 19 U.S.C. 2605(h). 

Dated: September 21, 2006. 

Dina Habib Powell, 

Assistant Secretary for Educational and 

Cultural Affairs, Department of State. 

[FR Doc. E6–16196 Filed 9–29–06; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4710–05–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Notice of Passenger Facility Charge 

(PFC) Approvals and Disapprovals 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Monthly Notice of PFC 

Approvals and Disapprovals. In August 

2006, there were six applications 

approved. This notice also includes 

information on four applications, one 

approved in September 2005, one 

approved in January 2006, and two 

approved in July 2006, inadvertently left 

off the September 2005, January 2006, 

and July 2006 notices, respectively. 

Additionally, 20 approved amendments 

to previously approved applications are 

listed. 

SUMMARY: The FAA publishes a monthly 

notice, as appropriate, of PFC approvals 

and disapprovals under the provisions 

of the Aviation Safety and Capacity 

Expansion Act of 1990 (Title IX of the 

Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 

1990) (Pub. L. 101–508) and Part 158 of 

the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 

CFR part 158). This notice is published 

pursuant to paragraph d of § 158.29. 

PFC Applications Approved 

Public Agency: County of Jefferson, 

Beaumont, Texas. 

Application Number: 05–05–C–00–

BPT. 

Application Type: Impose and use a 

PFC. 

PFC Level: $4.50. 

Total PFC Revenue Approved in this 

Decision: $290,471. 

Earliest Charge Effective Date: April 1, 

2007. 

Estimated Charge Expiration Date: 

November 1, 2008. 

Class of Air Carriers Not Required to 

Collect PFC’s: None. 

Brief Description of Projects Approved 

for Collection and Use: 

Airport drainage environmental 

study. 

Airfield lighting. 

Terminal renovations. 

Perimeter security upgrades. 

PFC application and administration 

fees. 

Decision Date: September 12, 2005. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ben 

Guttery, Texas Airports Development 

Office, (817) 222–5614. 

Public Agency: Coos County Airport 

District, North Bend, Oregon. 

Application Number: 06–07–C–00–

OTH. 

Application Type: Impose and use a 

PFC. 


rmajette on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 190 / Monday, October 2, 2006 / Notices 58045 

Total PFC Revenue Approved in this 

Decision: $320,000. 

PFC Level: $4.50 

Earliest Charge Effective Date: March 

1, 2008. 

Estimated Charge Expiration Date: 

July 1, 2010. 

Class of Air Carriers not Required to 

Collect PFC’s: 

Non-scheduled air tax/commercial 

operators, utilizing aircraft having a 

seating capacity of less than 20 

passengers. 

Determination: Approved. Based on 

information contained in the public 

agency’s application, the FAA has 

determined that the proposed class 

accounts for less than 1 percent of the 

total annual enplanements at North 

Bend Municipal Airport. 

Brief Description of Projects Approved 

for Collection and Use: 

Design new terminal building 

facilities. 

PFC administration. 

Decision Date: January 25, 2006. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Suzanne Lee-Pang, Seattle Airports 

District Office, (425) 227–2654. 

Public Agency: City of Fort Smith, 

Arkansas. 

Application Number: 06–03–C–00–

FSM. 

Application Type: Impose and use a 

PFC. 

PFC Level: $3.00 

Total PFC Revenue Approved in this 

Decision: $809,249. 

Earliest Charge Effective Date: January 

1, 2010. 

Estimated Charge Expiration Date: 

August 1, 2013. 

Class of Air Carriers not Required to 

Collect PFC’s: None. 

Brief Description of Projects Approved 

for Collection and Use: 

Perimeter road construction. 

Terminal apron. 

Terminal security equipment. 

Conditioned air at gates. 

Decision Date: July 5, 2006. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Don 

Harris, Arkansas/Oklahoma Airports 

Development Office, (817) 222–5634. 

Public Agency: City of Colorado 

Springs, Colorado. 

Application Number: 06–10–C–00–

COS. 

Application Type: Impose and use a 

PFC. 

Total PFC Revenue Approved in this 

Decision: $3,012,574. 

PFC Level: $3.00. 

Earliest Charge Effective Date: 

September 1, 2007. 

Estimated Charge Expiration Date: 

January 1, 2009. 

Class of Air Carriers not Required to 

Collect PFC’s: None. 

Brief Description of Projects Approved 

for Collection and Use: Canopies to 

cover public surface sidewalks for 

passenger and baggage movement to 

ground transportation areas. 

Access road to long term parking lot. 

Brief Description of Disapproved 

Project: Terminal circulation road. 

Determination: The project does not 

meet the requirements of § 158.15(c). 

The FAA could not determine that the 

project was adequately justified based 

on the traffic volume information 

provided by the public agency. In 

addition, the project does not meet the 

requirements of § 158.15(b)(1) in 

accordance with paragraphs 620(a)(4) 

and 620(b)(1) of FAA Order 5100.38C, 

Airport Improvement Program 

Handbook (June 28, 2005). 

Decision Date: July 28, 2006. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Chris Schaffer, Denver Airports District 

Office, (303) 342–1258. 

Public Agency: County of Milwaukee, 

Milwaukee, Wisconsin. 

Application Number: 06–13–C–00–

MKE. 

Application Type: Impose and use a 

PFC. 

Total PFC Revenue Approved in this 

Decision: $46,806,855. 

PFC Level: $3.00. 

Earliest Charge Effective Date: May 1, 

2018. 

Estimated Charge Expiration Date: 

January 1, 2024. 

Class of Air Carriers not Required to 

Collect PFC’S: Air taxi/commercial 

operators filing FAA Form 1800–31. 

Determination: Approved. Based on 

information contained in the public 

agency’s application, the FAA has 

determined that the proposed class 

accounts for less than 1 percent of the 

total annual enplanements at General 

Mitchell International Airport. 

Brief Description of Projects Approved 

for Collection and Use: 

Rehabilitate firehouse road. 

Runway and taxiway shoulder 

maintenance. 

Inline baggage security—construction. 

Public restroom renovation—design. 

Security system fiber optic 

replacement—design. 

Interactive employee training for 

safety and security. 

Ticketing drive road reconstruction. 

E concourse stem. 

Brief Description of Withdrawn 

Project: Southside trituration room. 

Date of withdrawal: July 25, 2006. 

Decision Date: August 2, 2006. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Nancy Nistler, Minneapolis Airports 

District Office, (612) 713–4353. 

Public Agency: Kansas City 

Department of Aviation, Kansas City, 

Missouri. 

Application Number: 05–05–C–00–

MCI. 

Application Type: Impose and use a 

PFC. 

PFC Level: $4.50. 

Total PFC Revenue Approved in this 

Decision: $56,963,842. 

Earliest Charge Effective Date: 

November 1, 2014. 

Estimated Charge Expiration Date: 

February 1, 2017. 

Class of Air Carriers not Required to 

Collect PFC’S: Air taxi/commercial 

operators filing FAA Form 1800–31. 

Determination: Approved. Based on 

information contained in the public 

agency’s application, the FAA has 

determined that the proposed class 

accounts for less than 1 percent of the 

total annual enplanements at Kansas 

City International Airport (MCI). 

Brief Description of Projects Approved 

for Collection at MCI and Use at MCI at 

a $4.50 PFC Level: 

Two new aircraft rescue and 

firefighting vehicles. 

New aircraft rescue and firefighting 

facility. 

Inline baggage screening. 

Brief Description of Project Approved 

for Collection at MCI for Future Use at 

Charles B. Wheeler Downtown Airport 

(MKC) at a $4.50 PFC Level: Fuel farm 

relocation. 

Brief Description of Projects Approved 

for Collection at MCI and Use at MCI at 

a $3.00 PFC Level: 

Extend taxiways B and D. 

Rehabilitate taxiways M and L. 

Update airport master plan and Part 

150 study update. 

Rehabilitate taxiway D. 

Airfield lighting rehabilitation. 

Terminal improvements—holdrooms. 

Upgrade glycol collection system. 

Brief Description of Project Approved 

for Collection at MCI for Future Use at 

MCI at a $3.00 PFC Level: Airfield snow 

removal equipment building. 

Brief Description of Projects Approved 

for Collection at MCI and Use at MKC 

at a $3.00 PFC Level: 

Reconstruct runway 1/19. 

Perimeter fencing replacement. 

Brief Description of Withdrawn 

Projects: 

New airfield sand and deicer storage 

building. 

Triturator and garbage facility. 

Date of withdrawal: August 8, 2006. 

Decision Date: August 8, 2006. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Mark Schenkelberg, Central Region 

Airports Division, (816) 329–2638. 

Public Agency: City of Houston, 

Texas. 

Application Number: 06–01–C–00–

HOU. 

Application Type: Impose and use a 

PFC. 


rmajette on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES1
58046 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 190 / Monday, October 2, 2006 / Notices 

PFC Level: $3.00. 

Total PFC Revenue Approved in This 

Decision: $163,415,047. 

Earliest Charge Effective Date: 

November 1, 2006. 

Estimated Charge Expiration Date: 

October 1, 2017. 

Classes of Air Carriers not Required to 

Collect PFC’s: 

(1) Part 135 air taxi/commercial 

operators filing FAA Form 1800–31; and 

(2) commuters or small certificated air 

carriers filing Department of 

Transportation Form T100. 

Determination: Approved. Based on 

information contained in the public 

agency’s application, the FAA has 

determined that each proposed class 

accounts for less than 1 percent of the 

total annual enplanements at William P. 

Hobby Airport. 

Brief Description of Projects Approved 

for Collection and Use: 

Rehabilitate runways 12L/30R and 

17/35. 

Rehabilitation and modifications to 

taxiway system. 

Expand taxiway electrical system. 

Airport drainage and storm water 

improvements. 

Acquire runway 17 protection zone. 

Airfield lighting and control. 

Central terminal expansion. 

Conduct master plan. 

Central concourse equipment. 

Apron reconstruction. 

Taxiway and taxilane reconstruction. 

Overlay runway 12R/30L. 

Perimeter fencing and obstruction 

removal. 

Access controls and 

telecommunications for airport 

operating area. 

Conduct environmental impact 

statement. 

Land acquisition for runway 4 

protection zone. 

Conduct drainage/storm water plan. 

PFC consulting, administration, and 

auditing. 

Decision Date: August 10, 2006. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ben 

Guttery, Texas Airports Development 

Office, (817) 222–5614. 

Public Agency: City of Chicago 

Department of Aviation, Chicago, 

Illinois. 

Application Number: 06–17–C–00–

ORD. 

Application Type: Impose and use a 

PFC. 

PFC Level: $4.50. 

Total PFC Revenue Approved in this 

Decision: $73,198,000. 

Earliest Charge Effective Date: 

November 1, 2015. 

Estimated Charge Expiration Date: 

June 1, 2016. 

Class of Air Carriers not Required to 

Collect PFC’S: Air taxi. 

Determination: Approved. Based on 

information contained in the public 

agency’s application, the FAA has 

determined that the proposed class 

accounts for less than 1 percent of the 

total annual enplanements at Chicago 

O’Hare International Airport. 

Brief Description of Projects Approved 

for Collection and Use at a $4.50 PFC 

Level: 

2005/2006 residential home 

insulation. 

2005/2006 school insulation. 

Brief Description of Project Approved 

for Collection and Use at a $3.00 PFC 

Level: Permanent noise monitoring 

system upgrade. 

Decision Date: August 17, 2006. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Chad Oliver, Chicago Airports District 

Office, (847) 294–7199. 

Public Agency: County of Kalamazoo, 

Kalamazoo, Michigan. 

Application Number: 06–05–C–00–

AZO. 

Application Type: Impose and use a 

PFC. 

PFC Level: $4.50. 

Total PFC Revenue Approved in this 

Decision: $1,500,000. 

Earliest Charge Effective Date: 

October 1, 2006. 

Estimated Charge Expiration Date: 

April 1, 2008. 

Class of Air Carriers not Required to 

Collect PFC’S: Non-scheduled Part 135 

and air taxi operators. 

Determination: Approved. Based on 

information contained in the public 

agency’s application, the FAA has 

determined that the proposed class 

accounts for less than 1 percent of the 

total annual enplanements at 

Kalamazoo/Battle Creek International 

Airport. 

Brief Description of Projects Approved 

for Collection and Use: 

Terminal renovation, expansion, new 

construction, and redesign. 

Decision Date: August 22, 2006 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Jason Watt, Detroit Airports District 

Office, (734) 229–2906. 

Public Agency: County of Marquette, 

Gwinn, Michigan. 

Application Number: 06–08–C–00–

SAW. 

Application Type: Impose and use a 

PFC. 

PFC Level: $4.50. 

Total PFC Revenue Approved in this 

Decision: $150,711. 

Earliest Charge Effective Date: 

October 1, 2006. 

Estimated Charge Expiration Date: 

May 1, 2008. 

Class of Air Carriers not Required to 

Collect PFC’s: None 

Brief Description of Projects Approved 

for Collection and Use: 

Runway safety area improvements 

(phase I—design). 

Snow removal equipment (sweeper 

and blower). 

Pavement and marking (airfield 

markings). 

Terminal access. 

Aircraft rescue and firefighting/snow 

removal equipment facility. 

Runway lighting (electrical conduit 

repairs—emergency). 

Runway safety area improvements 

(construction). 

Airport master plan study. 

Materials (sand) storage building 

(phase I—design). 

Aircraft rescue and firefighting 

vehicle (draft specifications only). 

Runway slab replacement (design). 

Aircraft rescue and firefighting 

vehicle—phase II. 

Sand storage building (phase II—

construction). 

Snow removal equipment. 

Runway slab replacement (phase II—

construction). 

Runway 1 slab replacement (south of 

Bravo taxiway). 

Airfield lighting improvements. 

Snow removal equipment. 

Rehabilitation of pavements. 

Runway 1 slab replacement south 

(construction) and north of Bravo 

taxiway (design only). 

Airfield lighting improvements (phase 

II—construction). 

Brief Description of Disapproved 

Projects: 

Passenger terminal expansion 

(design). 

Taxiway Bravo reconstruction 

(design). 

Interactive employee training system. 

Terminal building expansion (phase 

II—construction). 

Runway 19 instrument landing 

system. 

Taxiway Bravo reconstruction 

(construction). 

Snow removal equipment acquisition. 

Runway 1/19 threshold area 

rehabilitation. 

Pavement rehabilitation (rubber 

removal and painting). 

Runway 1 pavement replacement 

north of taxiway Bravo (construction). 

Determination: These projects do not 

meet the requirements of § 158.33(a)(1). 

The information provided indicates that 

the projects would not have been 

implemented within 2 years of 

approval. 

Fiscal Year 2005 project engineering 

and administration. 

Determination: Engineering and 

project administration costs must be 


rmajette on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 190 / Monday, October 2, 2006 / Notices 58047 

assigned to specific development 

projects. 

Decision Date: August 14, 2005. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Jason Watt, Detroit Airports District 

Office, (734) 229–2906. 

AMENDMENTS TO PFC APPROVALS

Amendment No. city, state Amendment 

approved date 

Original 

approved net 

PFC revenue 

Amended 

approved net 

PFC revenue 

Original estimated charge 

exp. date 

Amended estimated charge 

exp. date 

98–02–C–02–GUC, Gunnison, CO ..................................... 03/15/06 $183,754 $179,074 04/01/01 03/01/01 

03–04–C–01–PIH, Pocatello, ID .......................................... 04/05/06 456,500 497,218 10/01/07 04/01/08 

94–01–C–08–CVG, Covington, KY ..................................... 04/22/06 32,872,000 35,936,000 05/01/96 04/01/96 

02–03–C–02–PWM, Portland, ME ....................................... 05/18/06 18,234,688 19,425,419 03/01/13 12/01/13 

01–09–C–01–BNA, Nashville, TN ....................................... 05/31/06 26,005,000 4,145,183 10/01/04 04/01/03 

03–08–C–01–JAX, Jacksonville, FL .................................... 06/16/06 68,357,263 73,281,526 11/01/08 01/01/08 

96–03–I–02–SUN, Hailey, ID ............................................... 06/19/06 566,335 558,131 06/01/99 06/01/99 

99–04–C–01–SUN, Hailey, ID ............................................. 06/19/06 1,085,105 950,746 04/01/05 08/01/04 

99–04–C–02–SUN, Hailey, ID ............................................. 06/19/06 950,746 950,746 08/01/04 08/01/04 

98–02–C–01–SBN, South Bend, IN .................................... 06/28/06 1,367,991 1,387,143 06/01/03 11/01/02 

95–03–C–03–CLE, Cleveland, OH ...................................... 06/30/06 20,700,642 19,945,762 02/01/97 11/01/96 

03–03–C–01–SFO, San Francisco, CA ............................... 07/11/06 539,107,697 609,107,697 11/01/18 01/01/17 

98–03–C–07–CVG, Covington, KY ..................................... 07/24/06 24,833,000 24,852,000 08/01/99 08/01/99 

92–01–C–10–SJC, San Jose, CA ....................................... 07/27/06 70,625,368 64,670,368 07/01/96 07/01/96 

99–07–C–02–SJC, San Jose, CA ....................................... 07/27/06 12,950,000 12,628,000 01/01/02 07/01/02 

01–11–C–02–SJC, San Jose, CA ....................................... 07/27/06 118,161,491 131,055,103 07/01/06 01/01/07 

*97–01–C–03–SDF, Louisville, KY ...................................... 07/31/06 90,600,000 90,600,000 04/01/12 09/01/14 

01–02–C–04–SDF, Louisville, KY ....................................... 07/31/06 10,012,140 10,012,140 03/01/13 12/01/16 

03–03–C–02–SDF, Louisville, KY ....................................... 07/31/06 5,666,800 5,666,800 09/01/13 02/01/18 

06–04–C–01–SDF, Louisville, KY ....................................... 07/31/06 1,267,315 1,267,315 10/01/13 05/01/18 

Note: The amendment denoted by an 

asterisk (*) includes a change to the PFC 

level changed from $3.00 per enplaned 

passenger to $4.50 per enplaned passenger. 

For Louisville, KY, this change is effective on 

October 1, 2006: 

Issued in Washington, DC, on September 

22, 2006. 

Joe Hebert, 

Manager, Financial Analysis and Passenger 

Facility Charge Branch. 

[FR Doc. 06–8377 Filed 9–29–06; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–M 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Highway Administration 

Notice of Final Federal Agency Actions 

on a Proposed U.S. Highway Project in 

California 

AGENCY: Federal Highway 

Administration (FHWA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of Limitation on Claims 

for Judicial Review of Actions by FHWA 

and other Federal agencies. 

SUMMARY: This notice announces actions 

taken by the FHWA and other Federal 

agencies that are final within the 

meaning of 23 U.S.C. 139(1)(1). These 

actions relate to a proposed highway 

project on State Route 65 Lincoln 

Bypass between kilo post 19.3 to 38.3 

(post miles 12.0 to 23.8) in Placer 

County, State of California. These 

actions grant approvals for the project. 

DATES: By this notice, the FHWA is 

advising the public of final agency 

actions subject to 23 U.S.C. 139(1)(1). A 

claim seeking judicial review of the 

Federal agency actions on the highway 

project will be barred unless the claim 

is filed on or April 2, 2007. If the 

Federal law that authorizes judicial 

review of a claim provides a time period 

of less than 180 days for filing such 

claim, then that shorter time period still 

applies. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Cesar Perez, Project Development 

Engineer, Federal Highway 

Administration, 650 Capitol Mall, #4–

100, Sacramento, CA 95814, weekdays 

between 7 a.m. and 4 p.m., telephone 

916–498–5065, 

cesar.perez@fhwa.dot.gov. Karen 

McWilliams, Senior Environmental 

Planner, California Department of 

Transportation, 2389 Gateway Oaks Dr., 

Sacramento, CA 95833, weekdays 

between 8 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., (916) 

274–0568, 

karen.mcwilliams@dot.ca.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is 

hereby given that the FHWA and other 

Federal agencies have taken final agency 

actions by issuing approvals for the 

following highway project in the State 

of California. This project would 

improve safety and provide congestion 

relief on State Route 65, Placer County, 

California. This would be accomplished 

by constructing a four-lane freeway 

around the city of Lincoln, in Placer 

County, from south of Industrial Avenue 

to north of Riosa Rd. The actions by the 

Federal agencies, and the laws under 

which such actions were taken, are 

described in the Final Environmental 

Impact Statement for the project, 

approved on May 25, 2006, a Record of 

Decision approved on July 18, 2006, and 

in other documents in the FHWA 

administrative record. The Final 

Environmental Impact Statement and 

other documents in the FHWA 

administrative record file are available 

by contacting the FHWA or the 

California Department of Transportation 

at the addresses provided above. The 

FHWA Final Environmental Impact 

Statement can be viewed and 

downloaded from the project Web site at 

http://www.dot.ca.gov/dist3/projects/ 

lincoln/. 

This notice applies to all Federal 

agency decisions as of the issuance date 

of this notice and all laws under which 

such actions were taken, including but 

not limited to: 

1. General: National Environmental 

Policy Act (NEPA) [42 U.S.C. 4321–

4351]; Federal-Aid Highway Act [23 

U.S.C. 109]. 

2. Air: Clean Air Act 42 U.S.C. 7401–

7671(q). 

3. Wildlife: Endangered Species Act 

[16 U.S.C. 1531–1544 and Section 

1536], Fish and Wildlife Coordination 

Act [16 U.S.C. 661–667(d)]. Migratory 

Bird Treaty Act [16 U.S.C. 703–712]. 

4. Historic and Cultural Resources: 

Section 106 of the National Historic 


rmajette on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES1