alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Horace Hosley, Appellant, *v.*Niagara Falls Milling Company, Respondent.

(Argued May 8, 1907;

decided May 28, 1907.)

*Hosley*v. *Niagara Falls Milling Co.,*107 App. Div. 620, affirmed.

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered August 2, 1905, affirming a judgment- in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at a Trial Term in an action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been occasioned through defendant’s negligence.

*Forman D. Fish*for appellant.

*Clinton B. Gibbs*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.

Concur: G-ray, O’Brien, Werner and Chase, JJ.

Dissenting: Vann and Willard Bartlett, JJ. Absent: Cullen, Oh. J.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (IN THOUSANDS,
EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           9,391
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,728
<ALLOWANCES>                                       125
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,594
<PP&E>                                           4,225
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,494
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  20,092
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,262
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            14
<OTHER-SE>                                      16,346
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    20,092
<SALES>                                          3,956
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,956
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,372
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    74
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 466
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (8,024)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (8,024)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (8,024)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.63)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.63)


</TABLE>
§ 230.3 Application process. ( a ) The Forest Service will issue a national request for applications (RFA) for grants under the Community Forest Program. The RFA will be posted to *http://www.grants.gov* as well as other venues. The RFA will include the following information: ( 1 ) The process and timeline for submitting an application;
( 2 ) Application requirements (§ 230.4);
( 3 ) Review process and criteria that will be used by the Forest Service (§ 230.5); and
( 4 ) Additional information as the Forest Service determines appropriate.
( b ) Pursuant to the RFA, interested eligible entities will submit an application for program participation to: ( 1 ) The State Forester or equivalent official, for local governments and qualified nonprofit organizations; or
( 2 ) The equivalent officials of the Indian Tribe, for applications submitted by an Indian Tribe.
( c ) Interested eligible entities will also notify the Forest Service, pursuant to the RFA, when submitting an application to the State Forester or equivalent officials of the Indian Tribe.
( d ) The State Forester or equivalent official of the Indian Tribe will forward all applications to the Forest Service and, as time and resources allow, provide a review of each application to help the Forest Service determine: ( 1 ) That the applicant is an eligible entity;
( 2 ) That the land is eligible;
( 3 ) That the proposed project has not been submitted for funding consideration under the Forest Legacy Program; and
( 4 ) Whether the project contributes to a landscape conservation initiative.
( e ) If an applicant seeks technical assistance from the State Forester, nontribal applicants should contact the State Forester to discuss what technical assistance is needed and confirm that the State Forester is willing to provide that assistance. Tribal applicants should work with their equivalent officials (§ 230.2) to discuss and arrange similar technical assistance needs. Applicants must include a separate budget that outlines the financial needs associated with technical assistance activities (§ 230.10).
( f ) A proposed application cannot be submitted for funding consideration simultaneously for both the Community Forest Program and the Forest Service's Forest Legacy Program (16 U.S.C. 2103c).
ROSS MILLER

Secretary of State

SCOTT W. ANDERSON

Deputy Secretary

for Commercial Recordings

STATE OF NEVADA

OFFICE OF THE

SECRETARY OF STATE

Commercial Recordings Division

202 N. Carson Street

Carson City, NV 89701-4069

Telephone (775) 684-5708

Fax (775) 684-7138

JACK COHN

5000 ALTA DRIVE #432

LAS VEGAS, NV 89107

JACK COHN

5000 ALTA DRIVE #432

LAS VEGAS, NV 89107

Job:C20100319-0234

March 19, 2010

Special Handling Instructions:

AMD EMAILED TO RA 3/19/10 AJW

Charges

Description Document Number Filing Date/Time Qty Price Amount

Amendment 20100171311-07 3/18/2010 1:36:05 PM 1 $175.00 $175.00

24 Hour Expedite 20100171311-07 3/18/2010 1:36:05 PM 1 $125.00 $125.00

Total $300.00

Payments

Type Description Amount

Credit 285284|10031935586927 $300.00

Total $300.00

Credit Balance: $0.00

Job Contents:

File Stamped Copy(s): 1
§ 254.6 Segregative effect. ( a ) If a proposal is made to exchange Federal lands, the authorized officer may request the appropriate State Office of the Bureau of Management (BLM) to segregate the Federal lands by a notation on the public land records. Subject to valid existing rights, the Federal lands shall be segregated from appropriation under the public land laws and mineral laws for a period not to exceed 5 years from the date of record notation.
( b ) Any interests of the United States in the non-Federal lands that are covered by the exchange proposal may be noted and segregated from appropriation under the mineral laws for a period not to exceed 5 years from the date of notation.
( c ) The segregative effect terminates as follows: ( 1 ) Automatically, upon issuance of a patent or other document of conveyance to the affected lands;
( 2 ) On the date and time specified in an opening order, published in the Federal Register by the appropriate BLM State Office, if a decision is made not to proceed with the exchange or upon removal of any lands from the exchange proposal; or
( 3 ) Automatically, at the end of the segregation period not to exceed 5 years from the date of notation on the public land records, whichever occurs first.
EXHIBIT
32.01





Certification
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the quarterly report
ofSage Fund Limited
Partnership(“Fund”),on Form 10-Q for the
quarterendedSeptember 30, 2010 as filed with the U.S. Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(“Report”),I, Kenneth E. Steben,President
and Chief Executive Officer of Steben & Company, Inc., the General Partner
of the Fund,certify, pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350), that:




1.  TheReportfully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of1934;and




2.  The information contained
in theReportfairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe
Fund.








By:
            /s/ Kenneth E. StebenKenneth
      E. StebenPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer of the General
  Partner





November 10, 2010




E-3
Exhibit 32

Certificate Pursuant to

       18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
       as Adopted Pursuant to
       Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NetWolves Corporation (the "Company")
on Form  10-QSB for the  quarter  ending  September  30,  2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael
R. Rocque, Chief Executive Officer and Director,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date: December 13, 2006

                                           /s/ Michael R. Rocque
                                           ------------------------------------
                                           Michael R. Rocque
                                           Chief Executive Officer
                                           and Director



Certificate Pursuant to

       18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
       as Adopted Pursuant to
       Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NetWolves Corporation (the "Company")
on Form  10-QSB for the  quarter  ending  September  30,  2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Peter
C. Castle, Secretary and Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


Date: December 13, 2006
                                           /s/ Peter C. Castle
                                           ------------------------------------
                                           Peter C. Castle
                                           Chief Financial Officer,
                                           Vice President-Finance,
                                           Director, Treasurer and Secretary
#### §§ 406.161-406.169 [Reserved]
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
                      SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies that:

      1.    The Annual Report on Form 10-K of SPSS Inc. for the period ended
            December 31, 2004, as amended by that certain Amendment No. 1 to
            Annual Report on Form 10-K and this Amendment No. 2 to Annual Report
            on Form 10-K, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
            on the date hereof (the "Report"), fully complies with the
            requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
            Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of SPSS Inc.

Date: January 20, 2006                By: /s/ Jack Noonan
                                          -----------------------------------
                                          Jack Noonan
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**WAMU ASSET ACCEPTANCE CORP.**

** **

**RESTATED OFFICER’S CERTIFICATE**

 

I, Thomas G. Lehmann, certify that:

 

1.         I have reviewed this report on Form 10–K and all reports on Form 10–D required to be filed in respect of theperiod covered by this report on Form 10–K of WaMu Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-AR9 Trust (the ‘‘Exchange Act periodic reports’’);

 

2.         Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement ofa  material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.         Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form10–D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.         Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB,and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement(s) in all material respects; and

 

5.         All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their relatedattestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a–18 and 15d–18 have been included as anexhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10–K. 

 

 

 

Date:  As of March 15,2007

|   |   | /s/ Thomas G. Lehmann                                                                        |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   | Name:  ThomasG. Lehmann                                                                 |
|   |   | Title:   President and Senior Officer in Charge of Securitization of the Depositor |
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                        PURSUANT TO 18U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ace Marketing & Promotions, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Dean L.
Julia, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

                                                /S/ DEAN L. JULIA
                                                --------------------------------
                                                DEAN L. JULIA
                                                CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                                AUGUST 15, 2008
§ 228.5 Plan of operations—approval. ( a ) Operations shall be conducted in accordance with an approved plan of operations, except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section and in § 228.4 (a), (b), and (e). A proposed plan of operation shall be submitted to the District Ranger, who shall promptly acknowledge receipt thereof to the operator. The authorized officer shall, within thirty (30) days of such receipt, analyze the proposal, considering the economics of the operation along with the other factors in determining the reasonableness of the requirements for surface resource protection, and; ( 1 ) Notify the operator that he has approved the plan of operations; or
( 2 ) Notify the operator that the proposed operations are such as not to require an operating plan; or
( 3 ) Notify the operator of any changes in, or additions to, the plan of operations deemed necessary to meet the purpose of the regulations in this part; or
( 4 ) Notify the operator that the plan is being reviewed, but that more time, not to exceed an additional sixty (60) days, is necessary to complete such review, setting forth the reasons why additional time is needed: *Provided, however,* That days during which the area of operations is inaccessible for inspection shall not be included when computing the sixty (60) day period; or
( 5 ) Notify the operator that the plan cannot be approved until a final environmental statement has been prepared and filed with the Council on Environmental Quality as provided in § 228.4(f).
( b ) Pending final approval of the plan of operations, the authorized officer will approve such operations as may be necessary for timely compliance with the requirements of Federal and State laws, so long as such operations are conducted so as to minimize environmental impacts as prescribed by the authorized officer in accordance with the standards contained in § 228.8.
( c ) A supplemental plan or plans of operations provided for in § 228.4(d) and a modification of an approved operating plan as provided for in § 228.4(e) shall be subject to approval by the authorized officer in the same manner as the initial plan of operations: *Provided, however,* That a modification of an approved plan of operations under § 228.4(e) shall be subject to approval by the immediate superior of the authorized officer in cases where it has been determined that a modification is required.
( d ) In the provisions for review of operating plans, the Forest Service will arrange for consultation with appropriate agencies of the Department of the Interior with respect to significant technical questions concerning the character of unique geologic conditions and special exploration and development systems, techniques, and equipment, and with respect to mineral values, mineral resources, and mineral reserves. Further, the operator may request the Forest Service to arrange for similar consultations with appropriate agencies of the U.S. Department of the Interior for a review of operating plans.
# EUR-Lex - 12008E096 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008E096

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - PART THREE: UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS - TITLE VI: TRANSPORT - Article 96 (ex Article 76 TEC) **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0086 - 0087 *

Article 96

(ex Article 76 TEC)

1. The imposition by a Member State, in respect of transport operations carried out within the Union, of rates and conditions involving any element of support or protection in the interest of one or more particular undertakings or industries shall be prohibited, unless authorised by the Commission.

2. The Commission shall, acting on its own initiative or on application by a Member State, examine the rates and conditions referred to in paragraph 1, taking account in particular of the requirements of an appropriate regional economic policy, the needs of underdeveloped areas and the problems of areas seriously affected by political circumstances on the one hand, and of the effects of such rates and conditions on competition between the different modes of transport on the other.

After consulting each Member State concerned, the Commission shall take the necessary decisions.

3. The prohibition provided for in paragraph 1 shall not apply to tariffs fixed to meet competition.

--------------------------------------------------
**Exhibit 10.23**

 

October 4, 2010

 

 

SuperMedia Inc.

2200 West Airfield Drive

DFW Airport, Texas 75261

Attention: Douglas Wheat, Chairman of the Board of Directors

 

Re:      Resignation

 

 

Dear Douglas,

 

I hereby resign, effective immediately, as a director of the Company and the Company’s subsidiaries of which I am a director, and I hereby resign, effective immediately, as an officer of SuperMedia Inc. (the “Company”) and each of the Company’s subsidiaries of which I am an officer.

 

 

| Sincerely          |   |   |
|--------------------|--------|--------|
|               |   |   |
| /s/ Scott W. Klein |   |   |
| Scott W. Klein     |   |   |

 

----
Date of 

report 

1968 

Apr. 1 

@Jruutr nf tqr luitr~ itattn 

NINETIETH CONGRESS 

FIRST SESSION {Co~vened January 10, 1967 

Adjourned December 15, 1967 

SECOND SESSION {Convened Januaxy 15, 1968 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Prepat·ed under the direction of FRANCIS R. VALEO, Secretary of the Senate 

By GERALD A. HACKETT, Executive Clerk 

Tuesday, April 2, 1968 

NOMINATION 

Calendar Message N arne of nominee Office Predecessor 

No. No. 

HEMISFAIR 1969 

49 78 Edward Clark, of Texas ___ Commissioner for the 

Federal exhibit at 

HemisFair 1968. 

85-022-68-No. 140 

U. s. COV'lRHMEHT PRINTING OFFICE: 19$8
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 5500 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to instruct Inspectors General to 

report to Congress on social media communications. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 12, 2024 

Mr. SCHMITT introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to instruct Inspectors 

General to report to Congress on social media communications. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Transparency in Bu5 reaucratic Communications Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INSPECTOR GENERAL ACT OF 1978. 

7 Section 405(b) of title 5, United States Code, is 

8 amended by adding at the end the following: 

9 ‘‘(23) a detailed description of the contents and 

10 particular circumstances of any communication, or 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 5500 IS

1 attempted communication, between the establish2 ment and any internet computer service, information 

3 content provider, or access software provider (as de4 fined under section 230(f) of the Communications 

5 Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 230(f)), including— 

6 ‘‘(A) communications regarding content 

7 moderation (as described under section 

8 230(c)(2) of the Communications Act of 1934 

9 (47 U.S.C. 230(c)(2)); 

10 ‘‘(B) user content, including posts, photos, 

11 and videos; and 

12 ‘‘(C) any other communications relating to 

13 the internet computer service, information con14 tent provider, or access software provider’s data 

15 inputs, algorithms, modeling and simulation 

16 processes, analysis tools, or any related tool.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

GUSTAVO M. HERNANDEZ,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 271 EAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 13th day of December, 2018

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Whitehall Jewelers Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended February 2, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
  Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
  of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowlege:

|   
|---
|(1)
|   
|(2)

/s/ Michael DonMichael DonChief Executive Officer

May 16, 2008



---