alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Indented Bill of Materials

V Transmission Case

Level Symbol Name Number Qty Material Piece Cost Weight Piece Cost Weight (Total)

(Total)

0 V Transmission Case Mat V Transmission Case 1 Aluminum - 380 0.59 0.5360 lb 0.59

Mat
Weight (Total)

0.5360 lb
EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF EMERY L. FRAZIER, SECRETARY OF THE SENATE 

BY LARRY M. WHEELER, ExECUTIVE CLERK 

Wednesday, July 27, 1966 

'rREATIES 

Date of Calendar Treaty No. Subject Action or oommlttee report No. 

1965 

June 29 2 Ex. H (86th Cong., Hague Protocol to Warsaw Convention ____ Reported favorably by 

1st. sess.) . Mr. Fulbright from 

the Committee on 

Foreign Relations, 

with a printed report. 

(See Ex. Rept. No. 3, 

89th Cong., lst seas.) 

Aug. 3 3 Ex. D (88th Cong., Consular Convention With the Soviet lteported favorably by 

2d sess.). Union. Mr. Fulbright from 

the Committee on 

Foreign Relations, 

with a printed report, 

(See Ex. Rept. No. 4, 

89th Gong., lst sess.) 

I · Minority views filed 

Aug. 5, 1965. (See 

Ex. Rept. No. 4, p. 2, 

89th Gong., 1st seas.) 

6~-022--66--No.246 
2 

NOMINATIONS 

Date of Calondnr Message Name of nominee Ofl!ce Predecessor 

report No. No. 

u.s. COAST GUARD 

1966 

July 26 1074 252 Rear Adm. Paul E. Assistant Commandant of 

Trimble, U.S. Const the U.S. Coast Guard 

Guard. with the rank of vice 

admir'al. 

ENVIRONMENTAL 

SCIENCE SERVICES 

ADMINISTRATION 

Suhj.ect to qualifications 

provided by law, the following for permanent appointment to the grades 

indicated in the Environmental Science Services 

Administration: 

26 1075 .222 Harry D. Reed, Jr_ _______ Captain _____ __________ ___ 

26 1075 222 Emerson E. Jones _________ _____ do ___ _______ __ _____ __ 

26 1075 222 William E. RandalL _____ _ _____ do ___________________ 

26 1075 222 Allen L. Powell ____ _____ __ _____ do ____ ___ ____________ 

26 1075 222 Walter L. Bradly _________ Lieutenant commander _____ 

26 1075 222 Jeremy R.liutt ___________ Ensign ___________________ 

26 1075 222 Willis J. Kircik" __________ _____ do~-------- ---------

26 1075 222 Phillip B. Clark ___ -------- _____ do _________ __________ 

26 io75 222 Peter F. MacDoran _______ _____ do ____ _______________ 

26 1075 222 Donald R. Askew __ ___ ____ _____ do _________ __________ 

26 1075 222 Charles Y. Molyneaux. __ ___ ____ _ do--------------~----

I ' • 

n s GoVERN.MENr PRt.NTING OFFIC"Et19ii6
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

TYREE WATSON,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 4 EAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 27th day of June, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JUANITA KAMAGI,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 09-72425

Agency No. A096-362-372

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 15, 2012** 

Before: CANBY, GRABER, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Juanita Kamagi, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for review of the

Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal from an

immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying her application for asylum and

withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review

FILED

MAY 24 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-72425

de novo questions of law and for substantial evidence factual findings. Wakkary v.

Holder, 558 F.3d 1049, 1056 (9th Cir. 2009). We deny the petition for review.

Kamagi contends she suffered past persecution on the basis of an attack in

1997 and her husband’s loss of employment in 2000, and she contends she will be

persecuted in the future as an ethnic Chinese Christian. We reject Kamagi’s

request to remand her case because the BIA reasonably concluded that the IJ made

a finding of no past persecution and also made its own determination that the 1997

attack did not constitute past persecution. The record does not compel the

conclusion that the incidents Kamagi cites, even cumulatively, rise to the level of

persecution. See id. at 1059-60 (two beatings and robberies and being accosted by

hostile mob did not compel finding of past persecution); Nagoulko v. INS, 333 F.3d

1012, 1016 (9th Cir. 2003) (termination of petitioner’s employment because of her

religious beliefs was “not the type of economic deprivation that rises to the level of

persecution”). Further, substantial evidence supports the BIA’s finding that, even

as a member of a disfavored group, Kamagi failed to establish the requisite

individualized risk of persecution. See Halim v. Holder, 590 F.3d 971, 979 (9th

Cir. 2009) (petitioner did not show individualized risk where he “failed to offer

any evidence that distinguishes his exposure from those of all other ethnic Chinese
3 09-72425

Indonesians”); cf. Sael v. Ashcroft, 386 F.3d 922, 927-29 (9th Cir. 2004). 

Accordingly, Kamagi’s asylum claim fails.

Because Kamagi failed to meet the lower standard of proof for asylum, her

claim for withholding of removal necessarily fails. See Zehatye v. Gonzales, 453

F.3d 1182, 1190 (9th Cir. 2006).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
# EUR-Lex - 12008E068 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008E068

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - PART THREE: UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS - TITLE V: AREA OF FREEDOM, SECURITY AND JUSTICE - Chapter 1: General provisions - Article 68 **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0074 - 0074 *

Article 68

The European Council shall define the strategic guidelines for legislative and operational planning within the area of freedom, security and justice.

--------------------------------------------------
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>5

<LEGEND>

This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Balance Sheets for Golden Quest, Inc. at December 31,
1999 and the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Deficit for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.

</LEGEND>


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,740,034
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        33,942
<OTHER-SE>                                  (1,773,976)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                (1,740,034)
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,648
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              85,409
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (94,057)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (94,057)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (94,057)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.00)





</TABLE>
§ 218.21 Emergency situations. ( a ) *Authority.* The Chief and the Associate Chief of the Forest Service are authorized to make the determination that an emergency situation exists as defined in this section.
( b ) *Emergency situation definition.* A situation on National Forest System (NFS) lands for which immediate implementation of a decision is necessary to achieve one or more of the following: Relief from hazards threatening human health and safety; mitigation of threats to natural resources on NFS or adjacent lands; avoiding a loss of commodity value sufficient to jeopardize the agency's ability to accomplish project objectives directly related to resource protection or restoration.
( c ) *Determination.* The determination that an emergency situation exists shall be based on an examination of the relevant information. During the consideration by the Chief or Associate Chief, additional information may be requested from the responsible official. The determination that an emergency situation does or does not exist is not subject to administrative review under this part.
( d ) *Implementation.* When it is determined that an emergency situation exists with respect to all or part of the proposed project or activity, the proposed action shall not be subject to the predecisional objection process and implementation may proceed as follows: ( 1 ) Immediately after notification (see 36 CFR 220.7(d)) when the decision is documented in a Decision Notice (DN).
( 2 ) Immediately after complying with the timeframes and publication requirements described in 40 CFR 1506.10(b)(2) when the decision is documented in a Record of Decision (ROD).
( e ) *Notification.* The responsible official shall identify any emergency situation determination made for a project or activity in the notification of the decision (see 36 CFR 220.5(g) and 220.7(d)).
# EUR-Lex - 12008E325 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008E325

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - PART SIX: INSTITUTIONAL AND FINANCIAL PROVISIONS - TITLE II: FINANCIAL PROVISIONS - Chapter 6: Combatting fraud - Article 325 (ex Article 280 TEC) **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0188 - 0189 *

Article 325

(ex Article 280 TEC)

1. The Union and the Member States shall counter fraud and any other illegal activities affecting the financial interests of the Union through measures to be taken in accordance with this Article, which shall act as a deterrent and be such as to afford effective protection in the Member States, and in all the Union's institutions, bodies, offices and agencies.

2. Member States shall take the same measures to counter fraud affecting the financial interests of the Union as they take to counter fraud affecting their own financial interests.

3. Without prejudice to other provisions of the Treaties, the Member States shall coordinate their action aimed at protecting the financial interests of the Union against fraud. To this end they shall organise, together with the Commission, close and regular cooperation between the competent authorities.

4. The European Parliament and the Council, acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure, after consulting the Court of Auditors, shall adopt the necessary measures in the fields of the prevention of and fight against fraud affecting the financial interests of the Union with a view to affording effective and equivalent protection in the Member States and in all the Union's institutions, bodies, offices and agencies.

5. The Commission, in cooperation with Member States, shall each year submit to the European Parliament and to the Council a report on the measures taken for the implementation of this Article.

--------------------------------------------------
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE YANKEE
CANDLE COMPANY, INC. UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           9,630
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   28,586
<ALLOWANCES>                                       325
<INVENTORY>                                     45,425
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                90,020
<PP&E>                                         117,185
<DEPRECIATION>                                  26,714
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 337,433
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           70,016
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,041
<OTHER-SE>                                      76,191
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   337,433
<SALES>                                        194,205
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               194,205
<CGS>                                           88,479
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   88,479
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                67,058
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,362
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 26,443
<INCOME-TAX>                                    10,577
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             15,866
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    15,866
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.29


</TABLE>
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GRACE HENZLER; et al.,

 Plaintiffs - Appellants,

 v.

KEN SALAZAR, in his official capacity

as Secretary of the Interior; et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 09-35597

D.C. No. 3:07-cv-00220-TMB

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Alaska

Timothy M. Burgess, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted July 26, 2010

Anchorage, Alaska

Before: SCHROEDER, O’SCANNLAIN and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

Grace Henzler and other heirs of Dick George (“Henzler”) appeal the district

court’s summary judgment in favor of the Secretary of the Interior. Based on its

detailed review of the record, the district court found that “the Plaintiffs have failed

to present credible evidence raising a factual issue related to due process and the

FILED

AUG 26 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2

1930 rejection of George’s allotment application. The record establishes that the

minimum requirements outlined in Pence v. Kleppe were met at the time the GLO

closed George’s file.” We agree. Accordingly, we affirm.

This Court defers to an agency’s reasonable interpretation of its regulations. 

Martin v. Occupational Safety & Health Review Comm’n, 499 U.S. 144, 150

(1991). Under its reasonable interpretation of 43 C.F.R. pt. 4, the Interior Board of

Land Appeals generally does not have authority to overrule a decision that was

approved by an Assistant Secretary. Blue Star, Inc., 41 I.B.L.A. 333, 335 (1979). 

The Secretary is required, however, to provide procedural due process to

qualifying Alaska Native Allotment Applicants. Pence v. Kleppe, 529 F.2d 135,

142 (9th Cir. 1976). In cases involving a colorable claim that an applicant was

denied procedural due process, the IBLA can and has overruled decisions even

though approved by an Assistant Secretary. See, e.g., Heirs of Alexander Williams,

121 I.B.L.A. 224 (1991); Ellen Frank, 124 I.B.L.A. 349 (1992). By failing to

present credible evidence raising a factual issue related to due process, Henzler

failed to establish a colorable claim that Dick George was denied procedural due

process.

AFFIRMED.
Case 16-27347 Doc 1 Filed 08/25/16 Entered 08/25/16 15:34:40 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 9
Case 16-27347 Doc 1 Filed 08/25/16 Entered 08/25/16 15:34:40 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 9
Case 16-27347 Doc 1 Filed 08/25/16 Entered 08/25/16 15:34:40 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 9
Case 16-27347 Doc 1 Filed 08/25/16 Entered 08/25/16 15:34:40 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 9
Case 16-27347 Doc 1 Filed 08/25/16 Entered 08/25/16 15:34:40 Desc Main

 Document Page 5 of 9
Case 16-27347 Doc 1 Filed 08/25/16 Entered 08/25/16 15:34:40 Desc Main

 Document Page 6 of 9
Case 16-27347 Doc 1 Filed 08/25/16 Entered 08/25/16 15:34:40 Desc Main

 Document Page 7 of 9
Case 16-27347 Doc 1 Filed 08/25/16 Entered 08/25/16 15:34:40 Desc Main

 Document Page 8 of 9
Case 16-27347 Doc 1 Filed 08/25/16 Entered 08/25/16 15:34:40 Desc Main

 Document Page 9 of 9
<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 99.1
         CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
                            (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, the undersigned Chief Executive
Officer of Tandy Brands Accessories, Inc. (the "Company") hereby certifies:

         (i)      that the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal
                  year ended June 30, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with
                  the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
                  Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (ii)     that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.





Date:  September 27, 2002                      /s/ J.S.B. Jenkins
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               J.S.B. Jenkins
                                               Chief Executive Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Tennessee Valley Authority

          - [Meeting No. 06-05] 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Please call TVA Media Relations at (865) 632-6000, Knoxville, Tennessee. Information is also available at TVA's Washington Office (202) 898-2999. People who plan to attend the meeting and have special needs should call (865) 632-6000. Anyone who wishes to comment on any of the agenda in writing may send their comments to: TVA Board of Directors, Board Agenda Comments, 400 West Summit Hill Drive, Knoxville, Tennessee 37902. 

Dated: September 22, 2006. 

Maureen H. Dunn, 

General Counsel and Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 06-8335 Filed 9-25-06; 12:58 pm] 

BILLING CODE 8120-08-P
§ 230.5 Ranking criteria and proposal selection. The Forest Service will evaluate all applications received by the State Foresters or equivalent officials of the Indian Tribes and award grants based on the following criteria: ( a ) Type and extent of community benefits provided (§ 230.2);
( b ) Extent and nature of community engagement in the establishment and long-term management of the community forest;
( c ) Extent to which the community forest contributes to a landscape conservation initiative;
( d ) Likelihood that, unprotected, the property would be converted to nonforest uses;
( e ) Amount of cost share leveraged;
( f ) Extent of due diligence completed on the project, including cost share committed and status of appraisal;
( g ) Costs to the Federal Government; and
( h ) Additional considerations as may be outlined in the RFA.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         156,177
<SECURITIES>                                10,631,324
<RECEIVABLES>                                  215,934
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,003,435
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,767,968
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,003,435
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               555,955
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   73,460
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                482,495
<INCOME-TAX>                                   482,495
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            482,495
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   482,495
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>