alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EUR-Lex - 12008E215 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008E215

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - PART FIVE: EXTERNAL ACTION BY THE UNION - TITLE IV: RESTRICTIVE MEASURES - Article 215 (ex Article 301 TEC) **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0144 - 0144 *

Article 215

(ex Article 301 TEC)

1. Where a decision, adopted in accordance with Chapter 2 of Title V of the Treaty on European Union, provides for the interruption or reduction, in part or completely, of economic and financial relations with one or more third countries, the Council, acting by a qualified majority on a joint proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy and the Commission, shall adopt the necessary measures. It shall inform the European Parliament thereof.

2. Where a decision adopted in accordance with Chapter 2 of Title V of the Treaty on European Union so provides, the Council may adopt restrictive measures under the procedure referred to in paragraph 1 against natural or legal persons and groups or non-State entities.

3. The acts referred to in this Article shall include necessary provisions on legal safeguards.

--------------------------------------------------
#### § 223.6 Cutting and removal of timber in free-use areas.

Supervisors may designate portions or all of a National Forest as free-use areas where such action is compatible with land management plans and shall give public notice of their action. Within such free-use areas, any dead timber or any green timber previously marked or designated by forest officers may be cut and removed for personal use for domestic purposes. Cutting and removal of timber in free-use areas shall be in accordance with such rules as may be prescribed by the district ranger to prevent fires, minimize damage to uncut trees and other resources, and to avoid confusion among users.

[42 FR 28252, June 2, 1977, as amended at 44 FR 73029, Dec. 17, 1979. Redesignated at 49 FR 2760, Jan. 23, 1984]
~tuatt nf tqt luittb ~tatts NINETIETH CONGRESS 

FIRST 

SECOND 

SESSION {Convened JanuaJ) xo, 1967 

AclJomned December 15, 1967 

SESSION {Comcned January 15, 1968 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Pre pared tmd er the direction of FRANCIS R. V ALEO, Secretary of the Senate 

By GERALD A. HACKETT, Executive Clerk 

Wednesday, April 10, 1968 

UNANIMOUS-CONSENT AGREEMENT 

Ordered, Th!lt at 1 o'clock p.m. on Wednesda:·, Apr. 10, 1968, the SC'nate proceed to vote on the resolution 

of ratification to Ex L, 90th Cong., 1~t sess., the protocol of mnendmcnt to t he ChariC'r of the Organization of 

American States. 

(Apr. 8, 1968) 

TREATY 

Date of Calendar Treaty No SubJect I Act1on of comm1ttee report No. 

I 

1968 

Apr. 4 1 Ex. L (90th Cong., Protocol of amendment to the Charter of I Reported favombly by 

1st sess.) the Orgn.nization of Amcrica.n States. I Mr. Fulbnght, from 

the Committee on 

Foreign Relations, 

With t' printed report. 

(See Ex. Uept. No. 1, 

90th Cong., 2d sess.) 

815- 022- 68-No. 144 

US. G"OVERNMENT PRI NTING OF.F'ICE 1968
§ 13.325 Most directly affected Native Corporation. ( a ) Before the award of the first visitor service authorization in a park area to be made after the effective date of this subpart, the Director will provide an opportunity for any Native Corporation interested in providing visitor services within the applicable park area to submit an application to the superintendent to be determined the Native Corporation most directly affected by the establishment or expansion of the park area by or under the provisions of ANILCA. An application from an interested Native Corporation will include the following information: ( 1 ) Name, address, and phone number of the Native Corporation; date of incorporation; its articles of incorporation and structure;
( 2 ) Location of the corporation's population center or centers; and
( 3 ) An assessment of the socioeconomic impacts, including historical and traditional use and land-ownership patterns and their effects on the Native Corporation as a result of the expansion or establishment of the applicable park area by ANILCA.
( 4 ) Any additional information the Native Corporation considers relevant or the Director may reasonably require.
( b ) Upon receipt of all applications from interested Native Corporations, the Director will determine the “most directly affected” Native Corporation considering the following factors: ( 1 ) Distance and accessibility from the corporation's population center and/or business address to the applicable park area; and
( 2 ) Socioeconomic impacts, including historical and traditional use and landownership patterns, on Native Corporations and their effects as a result of the expansion or establishment of the applicable park area; and
( 3 ) Information provided by Native Corporations and other information considered relevant by the Director to the particular facts and circumstances of the effects of the establishment or expansion of the applicable park area.
( c ) In the event that more than one Native Corporation is determined to be equally affected within the meaning of this section, each such Native Corporation will be considered as a preferred operator under this subpart.
( d ) The Director's most directly affected Native Corporation determination applies to the award of all future visitor service authorizations for the applicable park area. However, a Native Corporation that did not apply for this determination in connection with an earlier visitor services authorization may apply for a determination that it is an equally affected Native Corporation for the applicable park area in connection with a later visitor services authorization. Such subsequent applications must contain the information required by paragraph (a) of this section, and must be made in a timely manner as described by the Director in the applicable solicitation document so as not to delay the consideration of offers for the visitor services authorization.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 50 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.50

                     One Hundred Eighteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
         the third day of January, two thousand and twenty four

                                 An Act

 
    To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to require the 
 Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to give priority 
 consideration to selecting Pensacola and Perdido Bays as an estuary of 
             national significance, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
    This Act may be cited as the ``Pensacola and Perdido Bays Estuary 
of National Significance Act of 2024''.
SEC. 2. PENSACOLA AND PERDIDO BAYS.
    Section 320(a)(2)(B) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 
U.S.C. 1330(a)(2)(B)) is amended by striking ``and Lower Columbia 
River, Oregon and Washington'' and inserting ``Lower Columbia River, 
Oregon and Washington; and Pensacola and Perdido Bays, Florida''.
SEC. 3. INELIGIBILITY WITH RESPECT TO FISCAL YEARS 2024 AND 2025.
    With respect to the amendment made by section 2, the Administrator 
of the Environmental Protection Agency may not use for the 
implementation of that amendment, including, with respect to Pensacola 
and Perdido Bays, Florida, convening a management conference, 
developing or carrying out a comprehensive conservation and management 
plan, or providing grants under section 320 of the Federal Water 
Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1330)--
        (1) any amounts appropriated to carry out the national estuary 
    program under that section for fiscal year 2024; or
        (2) unless the total amount appropriated to carry out that 
    program for fiscal year 2025 is at least $850,000 more than the 
    total amount appropriated to carry out that program for fiscal year 
    2023, any amounts appropriated to carry out that program for fiscal 
    year 2025.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
[Civ. No. 1555.

First Appellate District

April 21, 1915.]

#### F. DEPAVO et al., Respondents, v. N. RIZZO et al., Appellants.

Vendos and Vendee—Construction op Contract.—Judgment and order denying a motion for a new trial reversed on the authority of *Depavo*y. *Bizgo, ante,*p. 200.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County and from an order refusing a new trial. Wm. H. Donahue, Judge.

The facts are similar to those stated in the opinion in *Depavo*v. *Rizzo, ante.*p. 200.

W. E. Rode, and Rose & Glidden, for Appellant Elizabeth Piepenberg.

Stetson & Koford, for Appellant N. Rizzo.

Aldrich & Gentry, for Respondents.

THE COURT.

This is an appeal from the judgment by the defendant Elizabeth Piepenberg and from an order denying her motion for a new trial.

The facts are the same as in the case bearing the same name as the present, *ante,*p. 200, [149 Pac. 793], but numbered 1494, this day decided. Both appeals are from the same judgment, but taken by different defendants and by different methods. The points here urged in support of the appeal are there considered and decided, and the conclusion reached that the case should be reversed. For the reasons there given the judgment against this appellant should also be reversed, as also the order denying her motion for a new trial, and it is so ordered.
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Craig Lyndon Bell, Appellant

No. 06

- 17

- 00190

- CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee Appeal from the County Court at Law of Panola County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 2016

- C

0325 ). Opinion delivered b y Chief Justice Morriss, Justice Moseley and Justice Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court

below

. We affirm the judgment of the trial cour t

. We further order that the appellant, Craig Lyndon Bell, pay all costs of this appeal.

RENDERED JULY 18, 2018
BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III
CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement
of Berkshire Realty Company, Inc. and Subsidiaries on Forms S-3 (File Numbers
333-44567, 333-41525, 333-34201, 333-32565, 333-29831, and 033-77306) and Form
S-8 (File Number 333-03997) of our report dated January 16, 1998, except for
Note V, for which the date is February 27, 1998, on our audits of the
consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of Berkshire
Realty Company, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 1997 and 1996, and for
the year ended December 31, 1997, which is included in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K/A.


                                                        COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.


Boston, Massachusetts
April 3, 1998
# EUR-Lex - 12005SPN06/02 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12005SPN06/02

**Protocol concerning the conditions and arrangements for admission of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania to the European Union - Annex VI:List referred to in Article 20 of the Protocol: transitional measures, Bulgaria - 2.Freedom to provide services **

*
Official Journal L 157 , 21/06/2005 P. 0107 - 0108 *

2. FREEDOM TO PROVIDE SERVICES

31997 L 0009: Directive 97/9/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 March 1997 on investor-compensation schemes (OJ L 84, 26.3.1997, p. 22).

By way of derogation from Article 4(1) of Directive 97/9/EC, the minimum level of compensation shall not apply in Bulgaria until 31 December 2009. Bulgaria shall ensure that its investor–compensation scheme provides for cover of not less than EUR 12000 from 1 January 2007 until 31 December 2007 and of not less than EUR 15000 from 1 January 2008 until 31 December 2009.

During the transitional period the other Member States will retain the right to prevent a branch of a Bulgarian investment firm established on their territories from operating unless and until such a branch has joined an officially recognised investor-compensation scheme within the territory of the Member State concerned in order to cover the difference between the Bulgarian level of compensation and the minimum level referred to in Article 4(1) of Directive 97/9/EC.

--------------------------------------------------
# EUR-Lex - 12008E341 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008E341

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - PART SEVEN: GENERAL AND FINAL PROVISIONS - Article 341 (ex Article 289 TEC) **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0193 - 0193 *

Article 341

(ex Article 289 TEC)

The seat of the institutions of the Union shall be determined by common accord of the governments of the Member States.

--------------------------------------------------
EXHIBIT 31.2


                            SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

I, Dr. Leonard I. Weinstein, certify that:

1. I have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report  on Form 10-Q of  Medical  Makeover
Corporation of America;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer(s)  and I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

     a)  Designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or caused  such
disclosure  controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to
ensure that  material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including  its
consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
      b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions  about the effectiveness
of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and
     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over  financial  reporting  that occurred  during the  registrant's  most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's  fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has  materially  affected,  or is  reasonably  likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying  officer(s) and I have disclosed,  based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,  to the
registrant's  auditors  and the audit  committee  of the  registrant's  board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a) All significant  deficiencies  and material  weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal ( control over  financial  reporting  which are reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and
     b) Any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves  management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's  internal control over
financial reporting.


/s/ DR. LEONARD I. WEINSTEIN
---------------------------------
Dr. Leonard I. Weinstein
Chief Accounting Officer

Date: August 30, 2004
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Spicy Pickle Franchising, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Clint Woodruff, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and








(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ Clint Woodruff


Clint Woodruff


Chief Financial Officer





March 17, 2011
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 190 (Monday, October 2, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 57929]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-8393]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Defense Science Board

AGENCY: Department of Defense.

ACTION: Notice of Advisory Committee Meetings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Science Board Task Force on Software Assurance 
will meet in closed session on October 17, 2006; at Science 
Applications International Corporation (SAIC), 4001 N. Fairfax Drive, 
Arlington, VA. This meeting is to continue charting the direction of 
the study and assessing the current capabilities and vulnerabilities of 
DoD software.
    The mission of the Defense Science Board is to advise the Secretary 
of Defense and the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, 
Technology & Logistics on scientific and technical matters as they 
affect the perceived needs of the Department of Defense. At these 
meetings, the Defense Science Board Task Force will: Assess the risk 
that DoD runs as a result of foreign influence on its software and to 
suggest technology and other measures to mitigate the risk.
    In accordance with Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act, Pub. L. 92-463, as amended (5 U.S.C. App. II), it has been 
determined that these Defense Science Board Task Force meetings concern 
matters listed in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1) and that, accordingly, the 
meetings will be closed to the public.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: CDR Clifton Phillips, USN, Defense 
Science Board, 3140 Defense Pentagon, Room 3C553, Washington, DC 20301-
3140, via e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#71121d1817051e1f5f0119181d1d180102311e02155f1c181d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="07646b6e6173686929776f6e6b6b6e777447687463296a6e6b">[email protected]</span></a>, or via phone at (703) 
571-0083.

    Dated: September 26, 2006.
C.R. Choate,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 06-8393 Filed 9-29-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Date of 

report 

1970 

Feb. 25 

25 

26 

27 

@>ruatr nf t4r luitr~ itutrs 

NINETY-FIRST CONGRESS 

F S {Convened J•nuary 3, 1969 

IRST ESSION Adjourned Dc:c:ember 23, 1969 

SecOND SESSION {Convened Jeuary 19, 1970 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Prepared under the direction of FRANCIS R. VALEO, Secretary of the Senate 

By GERALD A. HACKETT, Executive Clerk 

Tuesday, March 3, 1970 

NOMINATIONS 

I Calendar Message 

I 

Name of nominee Office Predecessor 

No. No. 

I I U.S. MARSHALS I 

18 13 I Arthur F. Van Court, of U.S. marshal for the east· John C. Begovich, 

California ern district of Califorma 

for the term of 4 years. 

19 fl Carl H. Slayback, of U.S. marshal for the south- James J. Moos, 

Illinois. ern district of Ilhnois for resigned. 

the term of 4 years. 

DEPARTMENT OF 

DEFENSE 

20 46 Theodore C Marrs, of Deputy Assistant Secre- Ernest Louis Massad, 

Alabama tary of Defense for resigned. 

Reserve Affairs. 

SUPREME COURT OF 

THE UNITED STATES 

21 1 George Harrold Carswell, An Associate Justice of the Abe Fortas, resigned, 

of Florida Supreme Court of the [Reported favorably 

United States. by Mr. Eastland, 

from the Committee 

on the Judiciary, 

together with indiv1dual views. (See 

Ex. Rept. 91-14, 

91st Cong , 2d 

seas) 1 

67-022-70-No. 140 

U S GOVERNMENT PRINTIH!i OFFICE 1170
# EUR-Lex - 12007L/AFI/DCL/55 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12007L/AFI/DCL/55

**Treaty of Lisbon amending the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Community, signed at Lisbon, 13 December 2007 - B. Declarations concerning Protocols annexed to the Treaties - 55. Declaration by the Kingdom of Spain and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland **

*
Official Journal 306 , 17/12/2007 P. 0268 - 0268 *

55. Declaration by the Kingdom of Spain and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

The Treaties apply to Gibraltar as a European territory for whose external relations a Member State is responsible. This shall not imply changes in the respective positions of the Member States concerned.

--------------------------------------------------
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Innovative Software Technologies, Inc
(the  "Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending June 30, 2003,  as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Peter M. Peterson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to  18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

      (1) the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
      material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.

/s/ Peter M. Peterson
----------------------------
Peter M. Peterson
Chief Executive Officer
October 19, 2004
#### Thomas Finucan, Appellant, *v.*Thomas T. Ramsden et al., Respondents.

(Argued April 17, 1907;

decided May 7, 1907.)

*Finucan*v. *Ramsden,*111 App. Div. 920, affirmed.

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered January 31, 1906, affirming a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover for the cutting down of trees alleged to have been growing on plaintiff’s land.

*George Wallace*for appellant.

*James W. Treadwell*and *Fred Ingraham*for respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Weener, Willard Bartlett and Hiscock, JJ.