alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2
 RENTECH, INC.
 Certification of Chief Financial Officer
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Rentech, Inc.;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;
 3.
    
    [Intentionally Omitted];
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared;
 (b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;
 (c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluations; and
 (d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Dated: January 28, 2011
    /s/ Dan J. CohrsDan J. CohrsChief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
Exhibit 32.1
Section 1350 Certification
(Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer)
 
  (i)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (ii)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date:  August 27, 2009
    /s/ N. Roderick McGeachy, IIIN. Roderick McGeachy, IIIChief Executive Officer/s/ M.C. MackeyM.C. MackeyChief Financial Officer
**CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED** **EXHIBIT 10.13(c) REDACTED****AMENDMENT TWO****TO THE****BILLING SERVICES AND LICENSE AGREEMENT****BETWEEN****VERISIGN, INC.****AND****RURAL CELLULAR CORPORATION**     **THIS AMENDMENT TWO**by and between VeriSign, Inc. (“VeriSign”) and Rural Cellular Corporation(“Customer”) is made and entered into to be effective the date of the last signature hereto.**W I T N E S S E T H:**     WHEREAS, VeriSign and the Customer are parties to that certain Billing Services and LicenseAgreement, dated to be effective July 21, 2005 as amended by Amendment One dated to be effectiveJune 20, 2006, (hereinafter referred to as “Agreement”); and     WHEREAS, the parties hereto desire to amend the Agreement as provided herein;     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the covenants and undertakings set forthherein, VeriSign and Customer agree as follows:**1.** The first sentence of Section 3.B is replaced in its entirety with thefollowing:   *****2.** Except as hereby modified, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effectin all aspects throughout the remainder of the term thereof.*** Information omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commissionpursuant to a request for confidential treatment. License Agreement – Amendment Two Page 1 **VeriSign Proprietary**
 

 
     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties hereto has made and caused this Amendment Two tobe duly executed for it on its behalf by its authorized representative, to be effective the date ofthe last signature hereto.     The parties acknowledge and agree that this Amendment Two constitutes the entire understandingand agreement between VeriSign and Customer with respect to the subject matter hereof, andsupersedes any and all prior or contemporaneous oral or written representation, understanding,agreement or communication relating thereto.     The signatories to this Amendment Two hereby warrant and represent that they have theauthority to execute this Amendment Two on behalf of the entity or entities for which they sign.     This Amendment Two does not bind or obligate either party in any manner unless duly executedby an authorized representative.   **VERISIGN, INC.** **RURAL CELLULAR CORPORATION**   By: /s/ Thomas L. Dean By: /s/ W. A. Wilkinson, Jr.   Name: Thomas L. Dean Name: W. A. Wilkinson, Jr.   Title: VP – VCS Business Ops Title: VP BSS   Date: 10-5-06 Date: 10-2-06*** Information omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commissionpursuant to a request for confidential treatment. License Agreement – Amendment Two Page 2 **VeriSign Proprietary**
#### § 665.223 Relation to other laws.

To ensure consistency between the management regimes of different Federal agencies with shared management responsibilities of fishery resources within the Hawaii coral reef ecosystem management area, fishing for Hawaii coral reef ECS is not allowed within the boundary of a National Wildlife Refuge unless specifically authorized by the USFWS, regardless of whether that refuge was established by action of the President or the Secretary of the Interior.

[84 FR 2772, Feb. 8, 2019]
§ 1202.62 What are the procedures for disclosure of records to a third party? ( a ) To obtain access to records about a person other than yourself, address the request to the NARA Privacy Act Officer, National Archives and Records Administration, Room 3110, 8601 Adelphi Rd., College Park, MD 20740-6001. If you are requesting access for statistical research as described in § 1202.60(e), you must submit a written statement that includes as a minimum: ( 1 ) A statement of the purpose for requesting the records; and
( 2 ) Certification that the records will be used only for statistical purposes.
( b ) NARA will acknowledge your request within 10 workdays and will make a decision within 30 workdays, unless NARA notifies you that the time limit must be extended for good cause.
( c ) Upon receipt of your request, NARA will verify your right to obtain access to documents pursuant to § 1202.60. Upon verification, the system manager will make the requested records available to you.
( d ) If NARA determines that the disclosure is not permitted under § 1202.60, the system manager will deny your request in writing. NARA will inform you of the right to submit a request for review of the denial and a final determination to the appropriate NARA Privacy Act Appeal Officer.
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 18 (Friday, January 27, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 4631]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-842]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 5284]


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Life in the Pacific of the 1700s: The Cook/Forster 
Collection of the George August University of Gottingen''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236 
of October 19, 1999, as amended, and Delegation of Authority No. 257 of 
April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875], I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Life in the Pacific of the 1700s: The 
Cook/Forster Collection of the George August University of Gottingen,'' 
imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, 
are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to a 
loan agreement with the foreign owner or custodian. I also determine 
that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the Honolulu 
Academy of Arts, Honolulu, HI, from on or about February 23, 2006, 
until on or about May 14, 2006, and at possible additional venues yet 
to be determined, is in the national interest. Public Notice of these 
Determinations is ordered to be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Julianne Simpson, Attorney-
Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State 
(telephone: 202/453-8049). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-
44, 301 4th Street, SW., Room 700, Washington, DC 20547-0001.

    Dated: January 23, 2006.
C. Miller Crouch,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural 
Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 06-842 Filed 1-26-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
| ·   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| ·   | The information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                  |   |                                 |
|-----------------------|--------|--------------------------------------|
|                  |   |                                 |   |
| Date: August 14, 2009 | By:    | /s/ Terry Lee                        |   |
|                  |   | Chief Executive Officer and Chairman |   |
|                  |   | (Principal Executive Officer)        |   |
|                  |   |                                 |   |
§ 1212.215 What must I include in my drug-free awareness program? You must establish an ongoing drug-free awareness program to inform employees about— ( a ) The dangers of drug abuse in the workplace;
( b ) Your policy of maintaining a drug-free workplace;
( c ) Any available drug counseling, rehabilitation, and employee assistance programs; and
( d ) The penalties that you may impose upon them for drug abuse violations occurring in the workplace.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0357

IN THE MATTER OF:

L.R.W.,

A Youth in Need of Care.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time to 

produce transcripts on appeal, and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Court Reporter Kari Cuellar is 

granted an extension of time to and including September 21, 2022, 

within which to prepare, file, and serve the transcripts requested on 

appeal. 

The Clerk shall serve a copy of this Order upon the district court 

and the court reporter.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 23 2022

08/23/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0357
Case 16-82037 Doc 9 Filed 09/06/16 Entered 09/06/16 11:50:49 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
Received by OGC  on Wednesday, June 29, 2022 at 2:12pm

AOR001

AOR002

AOR003

AOR004

AOR005
#### § 1256.92 What is the purpose of this subpart?

This subpart implements section 501 of the United States Information and Educational Exchange Act of 1948 (22 U.S.C. 1461), as amended by section 202 of Public Law 101-246 (104 Stat. 49, Feb. 16, 1990). This subpart also outlines procedures that permit the public to inspect and obtain copies of USIA audiovisual records and other materials in the United States that were prepared for dissemination abroad and that have been transferred to NARA for preservation and domestic distribution.
BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

In the Matter of ) 

Aspen Lodging Group LLC d/b/a 

Provenance Hotels; Bashar Wali; Eileen 

Wali; Leslie Lew 

) 

) 

) 

) 

PRE-MUR 640 

CERTIFICATION 

I, Vicktoria J. Allen, recording secretary for the Federal Election Commission executive 

session on November 15, 2022, do hereby certify that the Commission decided by a vote of 6-0 

to take the following actions, subject to the Notice of Errata to the First General Counsel’s 

Report – Provenance Conciliation Agreement dated October 5, 2022, in the above-captioned 

matter: 

1. Open a Matter Under Review. MUR 8092

2. Find reason to believe that Aspen Lodging Group LLC d/b/a

Provenance Hotels violated 52 U.S.C. §§ 30122 and 30116(a)(1)(A),(a)

(1)(C); and 11 C.F.R. § 110.4(b)(1)(i) by making excessive reimbursed 

contributions in the name of another.

3. Find reason to believe that Bashar Wali violated 52 U.S.C. § 30122 and 

11 C.F.R.§ 110.4(b)(1)(ii) by making reimbursed contributions in the 

name of another and by permitting his name to be used to effect the

making of contributions in the name of another.

4. Take no action and close the file as to Eileen Wali.

5. Take no action and close the file as to Leslie Lew.

6. Approve pre-probable cause conciliation with Aspen Lodging Group

LLC d/b/a Provenance Hotels and Bashar Wali.

7. Approve the Factual and Legal Analyses, as recommended in the First

General Counsel’s Report dated September 30, 2022, and as last

circulated by Chairman Dickerson’s Office on November 14, 2022 at

5:41 p.m.

MUR809200041
Federal Election Commission Page 2 

Certification for Pre-MUR 640 

November 15, 2022 

8. Approve the Conciliation Agreements, as recommended in the First

General Counsel’s Report dated September 30, 2022, and last

circulated by Chairman Dickerson’s Office on November 14, 2022 at

5:41pm.

9. Approve the appropriate letters.

Commissioners Broussard, Cooksey, Dickerson, Lindenbaum, Trainor, and Weintraub 

voted affirmatively for the decision. 

Attest:

 November 17, 2022 

Date Vicktoria J. Allen 

Acting Deputy Secretary of the Commission 

Vicktoria J Allen Digitally signed by Vicktoria J Allen 

Date: 2022.11.17 18:12:48 -05'00'

MUR809200042
[No. 3875.]

#### Ex Parte W. A. Beaty.

“ Local Option” Law.—The commissioners’ court of a county has power only to issue such an order for an election under the provisions of the “ local option” law as is authorized by law. An election held under an order which exceeded the authority of the commissioners’ court is a nullity, and, therefore, all proceedings had thereunder are nullities. The commissioners’ court has power to order an election to prohibit the sale, but not to prohibit the *exchange*or *barter*of intoxicating liquors within a given locality. (Hurt, Judge, dissents.)

Habeas Corpus on appeal from the District Court of Throckmorton. Tried below before the Hon. J. V. Cockrell.

*427The. appellant was held under a capias charging him with a violation of the “local option” law.

*A. H. Carrington*and *West & McGown,*for the relator.

*J. H. Burts,*Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Opinion delivered June 2, 1886.

Willson,. Judge.

A majority of the court, Judge Hurt dissenting, are of the opinion that the order of the commissioners’ court of Throckmorton county, ordering an election in said county to determine whether or no’t the sale, *exchange,*or *barter*of intoxicating liquors should be prohibited in said county, is a nullity, because made without authority of law. Said court had no authority to order an election except in strict accordance with the law upon the subject, that is, to determine whether or not the *sale*of liquor should be prohibited in said county. It exceeded its authority in making the order it did make, and said order, and all proceedings had thereunder, are therefore null and void, and cannot have the effect to prohibit the sale of intoxicating liquors, etc., in said county.

The terms “exchange” and “barter,” used in the order, are not synonymous with “sale,” as we understand the words, but are materially different in meaning. (2 Rapalge & Lawrence’s Law Dic., 1144; Chitty on Contracts, 346; Smith’s Mer. Law, 479; Benj. on Sales, 2; Steele v. The State, 19 Texas Ct. App., 428.)

The motion .for rehearing is granted, the judgment of the court below is reversed, and the applicant is discharged from custody.

*Ordered accordingly.*

Hurt, Judge, dissents.
1

Medina, Dayana

From: Medina, Dayana

Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 9:02 AM

To: Pettyjohn, Mary

Cc: Donaldson, Guy; Feldman, Michael

Subject: Region 6 comments on AEP Flint Creek 

Hi Mary,  

Here are Region 6’s comments regarding the most recent version of the AEP Flint Creek BART report and the updated

cost spreadsheets and other information provided by AEP/SWEPCO via email on 4/11/13. Please let me know if you’d

like to discuss.  

NOx 

It does not appear that any new information was provided related to the cost estimate for the NOx control 

options. As we indicated in comments provided on 02/08/2013, very little documentation has been provided for 

the capital and operating costs for the LNB/OFA and SCR control options. In particular, for the LNB/OFA 

option, there is no breakdown provided for the estimated capital and installation costs. A breakdown of these 

costs should be provided, along with a copy of any pertinent documents related to the “Public Service 

Commission Docket 12-008-U” referenced under footnote 1, and any other documentation to support the 

LNB/OFA cost estimate. We also note that the LNB/OFA cost estimate assumes a 15 year equipment life. 

Unless proper documentation is provided to demonstrate that the anticipated equipment life of this control 

option is limited to 15 years, we believe that an anticipated 30 year equipment life would be more appropriate to 

use in the cost analysis. The cost estimate for the SCR option also provides no breakdown of the capital costs 

and very little detail of the O&M costs. Footnote 1 indicates that the SCR capital and O&M cost estimates were 

developed by AEP based on engineering estimates that were informed by AEP’s experience with SCR 

installation at other plants owned by AEP. Please provide documentation to support the SCR cost estimate. In 

addition, we note that the SCR cost estimate assumes a 20 year equipment life. Unless proper documentation is 

provided to demonstrate that the anticipated equipment life of SCR is limited to 20 years, we believe that an 

anticipated 30 year equipment life would be more appropriate to use in the cost analysis. 

In addition, as we noted in previous written comments, additional justification should be provided for the 

selection of 0.23 lb/MMBtu as the NOx BART emission limit using LNB/OFA. The BART report states that 

this limit was selected based on experience with similar boilers and vendor discussions. A vendor quote should 

be provided or a list of similarly configured boilers should be compiled along with emissions data from CAMD 

for these similar boilers in support of the 0.23 lb/MMBtu NOx BART emission limit for the Flint Creek unit. 

Modeling 

Please provide a copy of the EPRI calculations used to estimate SO4 emissions for all modeling scenarios. 

Thank you,  

Dayana Medina

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6

Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division

Air Planning Section (6PD‐L)

214‐665‐7241
EXHIBIT 23.2

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We have issued our report dated May 15, 2002, with respect to the financial
statements of Laidlaw International SA, as of and for the year ended December
31, 2001 included in the accompanying the consolidated financial statements in
the Annual Report of Laidlaw Global Corporation and Subsidiaries on Form 10-KSB
for the year ended December 31, 2002. We hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference of said report in the Registration Statement of Laidlaw Global
Corporation and Subsidiaries on Form S-8 (File No. 333-49882, effective November
14, 2000).

Cofisys


Jean Michel Matt

Paris, France April 14, 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                                       <C>                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             3-MOS                 12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1996           DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-31-1996           DEC-31-1996


<CASH>                                              0              12,621
<SECURITIES>                                        0                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       0              19,437
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0               1,691
<INVENTORY>                                         0               1,900
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    0              33,767
<PP&E>                                              0              17,800
<DEPRECIATION>                                      0              12,261
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      0              52,035
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               0              23,229
<BONDS>                                             0                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0                   0
<PREFERRED>                                         0                   0
<COMMON>                                            0                  77
<OTHER-SE>                                          0              26,450
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        0              52,035
<SALES>                                        23,156              83,989
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               23,156              83,989
<CGS>                                           2,217               8,455
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   2,217               8,455
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               18,269              65,023
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  371                 931
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 23                  53
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     0                   0
<INCOME-TAX>                                      901               3,604
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             1,924               7,182
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0                   0
<CHANGES>                                           0                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                    1,924               7,182
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.23                0.85
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.23                0.85




</TABLE>