alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1192.53 Doorways. ( a ) *Clear width.* ( 1 ) Passenger doorways on vehicle sides shall have clear openings at least 32 inches wide when open.
( 2 ) If doorways connecting adjoining cars in a multi-car train are provided, and if such doorway is connected by an aisle with a minimum clear width of 30 inches to one or more spaces where wheelchair or mobility aid users can be accommodated, then such doorway shall have a minimum clear opening of 30 inches to permit wheelchair and mobility aid users to be evacuated to an adjoining vehicle in an emergency.
( b ) *Signage.* The International Symbol of Accessibility shall be displayed on the exterior of accessible vehicles operating on an accessible and rapid rail system unless all vehicles area accessible and are not marked by the access symbol. (See Fig. 6)
( c ) *Signals.* Auditory and visual warning signals shall be provided to alert passengers of closing doors.
( d ) *Coordination with boarding platform* — ( 1 ) *Requirements.* Where new vehicles will operate in new stations, the design of vehicles shall be coordinated with the boarding platform design such that the horizontal gap between each vehicle door at rest and the platform shall be no greater than 3 inches and the height of the vehicle floor shall be within plus or minus 5 ⁄ 8 inch of the platform height under all normal passenger load conditions. Vertical alignment may be accomplished by vehicle air suspension or other suitable means of meeting the requirement.
( 2 ) *Exception.* New vehicles operating in existing stations may have a floor height within plus or minus 11 ⁄ 2 inches of the platform height. At key stations, the horizontal gap between at least one door of each such vehicle and the platform shall be no greater than 3 inches.
( 3 ) *Exception.* Retrofitted vehicles shall be coordinated with the platform in new and key stations such that the horizontal gap shall be no greater than 4 inches and the height of the vehicle floor, under 50% passenger load, shall be within plus or minus 2 inches of the platform height.
Case 16-28600 Doc 1 Filed 09/07/16 Entered 09/07/16 11:28:34 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 9
Case 16-28600 Doc 1 Filed 09/07/16 Entered 09/07/16 11:28:34 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 9
Case 16-28600 Doc 1 Filed 09/07/16 Entered 09/07/16 11:28:34 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 9
Case 16-28600 Doc 1 Filed 09/07/16 Entered 09/07/16 11:28:34 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 9
Case 16-28600 Doc 1 Filed 09/07/16 Entered 09/07/16 11:28:34 Desc Main

 Document Page 5 of 9
Case 16-28600 Doc 1 Filed 09/07/16 Entered 09/07/16 11:28:34 Desc Main

 Document Page 6 of 9
Case 16-28600 Doc 1 Filed 09/07/16 Entered 09/07/16 11:28:34 Desc Main

 Document Page 7 of 9
Case 16-28600 Doc 1 Filed 09/07/16 Entered 09/07/16 11:28:34 Desc Main

 Document Page 8 of 9
Case 16-28600 Doc 1 Filed 09/07/16 Entered 09/07/16 11:28:34 Desc Main

 Document Page 9 of 9
[Nos. 3713 and 3714.]

#### A. Wadgymar *v.*The State.

Misdemeanor—Information.—Affidavit is an indispensable prerequisite to the sufficiency of an information to charge a misdemeanor, and must appear as a part of the record on appeal. Neither of the records in these cases bring up affidavits, and the convictions must, therefore, be set aside.

Appeal from the County Court of Dimmit. Tried below before the Hon. J. T. Longino, County Judge.

The convictions were for violations of the local option law, and the penalties imposed were afine of fifty dollars in one case, and one hundred dollars in the other.

*Hazlerigg & Vandervoot, M. L. Moody, Earnest & Knott,*for the appellant.

*J. H. Burts,*Assistant A-ttorney General, for the State.

Willson, Judge.

These appeals are from convictions had upon informations, and the records do not contain the oaths in writing required by the statute in such cases. (Code Crim. Proc., Art. 431.) The oath required by the article above cited is a necessary prerequisite to the validity of a prosecution by information,.and *460the record on appeal must contain such oath, otherwise the conviction must be set aside. (Lackey v. The State, 14 Texas Ct. App., 164; Rose v. The State, 19 Texas Ct. App., 470.)

Opinion delivered June 5, 1886.

The judgments are reversed and the causes are remanded.

*Reversed and remanded.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          44,974
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      220
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        201
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                45,550
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  45,550
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           401
<OTHER-SE>                                      45,149
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    45,550
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,121
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,121)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       220
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,901)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,901)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)


</TABLE>
§ 72.60 Grant administrative procedures. ( a ) *Admininstrative Requirements for Recipients of UPARR Assistance.* For all grants under this Program, the administrative requirements are the attachments listed in the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-102 (as revised).
( b ) *Accounts, Audit, Inspection.* Adequate financial records must be maintained by the applicant to support all expenditures or costs covered by a Recovery Action Program, Rehabilitation or Innovation project, as specified in Federal Management Circular (FMC) 74-4 and OMB Circular A-102.
( c ) *Additional conditions.* The Director may, with respect to any grant, impose additional conditions prior to, or at the time of grant approval, when in his or her judgement these conditions are necessary to assure or protect advancement of the grant purposes, the interests of public health or safety, or the conservation of grant funds. Extra requirements may be imposed on high-risk grantees who have records of default on prior Federal grants.
( d ) *Remedies for Noncompliance.* In appropriate circumstances, the Director may suspend or recoup the financial assistance provided under UPARR, upon the formal finding that the Grantee is in violation of the terms of the grant or the provisions of these regulations.
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 20 (Tuesday, January 31, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 5053]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-872]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary of Defense


Public Meeting of the Defense Advisory Committee on Military 
Compensation

AGENCY: DoD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On December 29, 2005, the Department of Defense published a 
notice of meeting (70 FR 77150) scheduled for January 24, 2006, 10 a.m. 
Due to last minute cancellations of committee members, attendance would 
be insufficient to conduct public deliberations, therefore the meeting 
is canceled. This announces the cancellation. This meeting will be 
rescheduled and announced at a later date.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: LTC Janet Fenton, Designated Federal 
Official, Defense Advisory Committee on Military Compensation, 2521 S. 
Clark Street, Arlington, VA 22202. Telephone: 703-699-2718.

    Dated: January 25, 2006.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register, Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 06-872 Filed 1-30-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M
#### § 1231.16 What restrictions are there on use of transferred records?

Restrictions imposed under a statute or Executive order must continue to be imposed after the transfer. Restrictions imposed by agency determination must also continue, unless the restrictions are removed by agreement between the agencies concerned.
Date of 

report 

1970 

Dec 8 

Date of report 

1970 

Dec 16 

~ruatr nf tqr lnitrh jtutra 

NINETY-FIRST CONGRESS 

F S { Convened January 3, 1969 

IRST ES<;ION Adjourned December 21, 1969 

S S {Convened fanuary 19, 1970 

ECOND ESSION 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Prepared under the direction of FRANCIS R. VALEO, Secretary of the Senate 

By GERALD A. HACKETT, Executive Clerk 

Monday, December 21, 1970 

TREATY 

Calendar Treaty No Subject A.ct!on ot committee 

No 

11 Ex 0 (Slst Cong , International Convention on the Prevention Reported favorably With 

1st sess) and Punhhment of the Cnme of Gena- 3 understandings and 

Clde 1 declaratiOn by Mr 

Church, from the Committee on Foreign Rela wn~, With a prmted 

I 

report together with 

mdiv1dual views (See 

Ex Rept 91-25 ) I I I 

NOMINATION I 

Calendar Message Name ofnommee I Office Predecessor No No 

DEP A.RTMENT OF 

JUSTICE 

236 14 Donald W Wyatt, of U S marshal for the ills- Peter J Foley 

Rhode Island trlCt of Rhode Island 

for the term of 4 years 

4q-.Q22-70-No 246 U S GOVERHMENJ PRIH1'1HQ OFfiCII tt70
##### 



Exhibit 12.1
 MAVERICK TUBE CORPORATION
Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges
  Year Ended December 31,2005
    
    
    2004
    
    
    2003
    
    
    2002
    
    
    2001Income from continuing operations
before income taxes
    
    $
    242,178
    
    
    $
    278,762
    
    
    $
    41,980
    
    
    $
    3,722
    
    
    $
    62,656Fixed charges:Interest expense including
amortized debt issuance costs
    
    
    14,222
    
    
    
    9,795
    
    
    
    9,637
    
    
    
    4,325
    
    
    
    3,090Capitalized interest
    
    
    2,035
    
    
    
    868
    
    
    
    670
    
    
    
    616
    
    
    
    1,251Interest portion of rent expense (1)
    
    
    1,876
    
    
    
    1,649
    
    
    
    1,332
    
    
    
    1,368
    
    
    
    1,452Total fixed charges
    
    
    18,133
    
    
    
    12,312
    
    
    
    11,639
    
    
    
    6,309
    
    
    
    5,793Plus: amortization of capitalized interest
    
    
    380
    
    
    
    380
    
    
    
    380
    
    
    
    380
    
    
    
    380Less: capitalized interest
    
    
    2,035
    
    
    
    868
    
    
    
    670
    
    
    
    616
    
    
    
    1,251Earnings$
    258,656
    
    
    $
    290,586
    
    
    $
    53,329
    
    
    $
    9,795
    
    
    $
    67,578Ratio of earnings to fixed charges (2)
    
    
    14.3
    
    
    
    23.6
    
    
    
    4.6
    
    
    
    1.6
    
    
    
    11.7
 
 (1)
    
    Calculated as one-third of rent expense, which is a reasonable approximation of the
interest factor.(2)
    
    This ratio is computed by dividing the earnings by the total fixed charges for the applicable
period. Earnings are defined as pretax income from continuing operations, plus fixed charges and
amortization of capitalized interest, less capitalized interest. Fixed charges represent total
interest charges (including capitalized interest), capitalized expenses related to indebtedness and
an estimate of the interest within rental expense.
Your session is about to expire.Resume session

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Welcome.Log inorregisterCOPS OFFICE RESOURCE CENTER

HomeCatalogCartOrders

                    

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                CatalogMatches: 1Offline form Recent Popular Online Print OtherCOPS-W0858Making It Safer: A Study of Law Enforcement Fatalities Between 2010-2016This report developed by the National Law Enforcement Officers Memorial Fund Advisory Panel encompasses a seven-year study conducted from 2010-2016 to analyze 1,016 line-of-duty deaths. Designed to enhance officer safety by providing the most up to date analysis of fatal incidents, the report examines events that involved both dispatched calls for service and self-initiated activities such as traffic stops. Making It Safer uses case studies, analysis of key findings, and statistics to make safety recommendations in several areas. In addition to analyzing responses to domestic violence attacks, rifle attacks, ambushes and police assassinations, the study also examines the role of seatbelt and body armor use in reducing officer fatalities.By Nick Breul, Desiree LuongoCategories: Data and AnalysisLanguage: EnglishPublic linkhttps://portal.cops.usdoj.gov/resourcecenter?item=cops-w0858Click here to see the entire catalog.Cart:Download PDFWeb • Mar 2018Search catalogreset title abstract authors contentContaining text: exact phraseNot containing text: exact phraseLanguage:anyEnglishSpanishHmongVietnameseCategory:anyAlternatives to IncarcerationCommunity PartnershipsData and AnalysisEthics and IntegrityFoundations of Community PolicingHiring, Recruitment, and RetentionHomeland SecurityNew Immigrant CommunitiesNonviolent CrimeOtherPolice OperationsPOP Center ResourceSchool and Campus SafetyTechnologyTribalViolent CrimeYouth SafetyPublished after:Published before:Page1

                    

FOIA | No FEAR Act | Open Government | Privacy | Legal|HelpCopyright (C) U.S. Department of Justice, COPS Office, IT Division, 2012 - 2024. All rights reserved.
Rendered on Mon Mar 4 2024 at 05:42 (UTC-5) in 0.88 secEnterprise Framework 3.21.7.7 • Store Controls 3.3.1.7Survey 500303407 Section 60000560 Rules Hints Inactive
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Craig Lyndon Bell, Appellant

No. 06-17-00190-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the County Court at Law of 

Panola County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 2016-C0325). Opinion delivered by Chief Justice 

Morriss, Justice Moseley and Justice 

Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We further order that the appellant, Craig Lyndon Bell, pay all costs of this appeal.

RENDERED JULY 18, 2018

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
§ 331.5 Explosives and fireworks. Unless otherwise authorized in writing by the District Engineer. ( a ) The possession or use of fireworks is prohibited.
( b ) The possession or use of explosives is prohibited.
Exhibit 13.1



SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION



(pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended January 2, 2005 of Koninklijke Ahold N.V. (the Company) as filed with the
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the Commission) on the date hereof (the Report) and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Anders C. Moberg,
President, Chief Executive Officer and Member of the Corporate Executive Board of the Company, certify, that, to my knowledge:



(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



By:

/s/ Anders C. MobergName: Anders C. MobergTitle: President, Chief Executive Officer and Member of the Corporate Executive Board




Date: April 14, 2005



A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Commission or its staff upon request.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 621 

To amend the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008 to clarify propane 

storage as an eligible use for funds provided under the storage facility 

loan program, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 2, 2023 

Ms. ERNST (for herself and Ms. KLOBUCHAR) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 

A BILL 

To amend the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008 

to clarify propane storage as an eligible use for funds 

provided under the storage facility loan program, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. STORAGE FACILITY LOANS. 

4 Section 1614(a) of the Food, Conservation, and En5 ergy Act of 2008 (7 U.S.C. 8789(a)) is amended— 

6 (1) by striking ‘‘funds for producers’’ and in7 serting the following: ‘‘funds for— 

8 ‘‘(1) producers’’; and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 621 IS

1 (2) in paragraph (1) (as so designated), by 

2 striking the period at the end and inserting the fol3 lowing: ‘‘; or 

4 ‘‘(2) agricultural producers to construct or up5 grade storage facilities for propane that is primarily 

6 used for agricultural production (as such term is de7 fined in section 4279.2 of title 7, Code of Federal 

8 Regulations (as in effect on the date of the enact9 ment of this paragraph)).’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Case 16-28496 Doc 14 Filed 09/08/16 Entered 09/09/16 10:46:29 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
§ 13.1906 Headquarters/Visitor Center Developed Area (HVCDA). For purposes of this subpart, the HVCDA consists of all park areas within a 1 ⁄ 2 mile radius of the Wrangell-St. Elias National Park and Preserve Headquarters building, other than the Valdez Trail. The following activities are prohibited within the HVCDA: ( a ) Lighting or maintaining a fire;
( b ) Camping;
( c ) Entering the area after visiting hours (visiting hours will be posted at the entrance gate).
#### § 29.31 Mineral ownerships in the United States.

Where mineral rights to lands in wildlife refuge areas are vested in the United States, the provisions of 43 CFR 3101.3-3, 3109.4, 3201.1-6 and 3501.2-2 govern.

[31 FR 16026, Dec. 15, 1966, as amended at 44 FR 42976, July 23, 1979]
#### MICHAEL JAHNER, Respondent, v. GEORGE KARY, Appellant.

(169 N. W. 31.)

Justice court —appeal from —to district court —appeal dismissed — order on — not appealable.

Following Re Weber, 4 N. D. 119, it is *held*that an order of the district court dismissing an appeal from a justice’s court is not an appealable order.

Opinion filed September 20, 1918.

Appeal from the District Court of Stark County, Honorable *W. G. Crawford,*Judge.

Defendant appeals from an order dismissing an appeal from a justice of the peace.

Dismissed.

*H. C. Berry,*for appellant.

*Thomas H. Pugh*and *Otto Thress,*for respondent.

Per Curiam.

On July 3, 1917, the plaintiff recovered a judgment against the defendant in a justice’s court in Stark county. The defendant appealed to the district court. On December. 7, 1917, the district court made an order dismissing the appeal. The order was served upon the defendant’s attorney personally on December 8, 1917. On February 4, 1918, the defendant attempted to appeal from such order, by serving and filing notice of appeal and undertaking on appeal. The record on appeal was transmitted to and filed in the office of the clerk of the supreme court on February 13, 1918. On September 16, 1918, the plaintiff moved for a dismissal of the appeal on the grounds: (1) That the order is not appealable; and (2) that, in any event, the appeal has not been prosecuted with due diligence. In our opinion both grounds would be well taken; but a determination of the first precludes and makes it unnecessary to consider the second ground. That such order is not appealable is well settled by the decisions of this court. *487See Re Weber, 4 N. D. 119, 28 L.R.A. 621, 59 N. W. 523; Dibble v. Hanson, 17 N. D. 21, 114 N. W. 371, 16 Ann. Cas. 1210.

The appeal is dismissed.

Grace, J.

In concur in the result.