alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 31.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Sean McDonnell, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Ace Marketing &
Promotions, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer (if any) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

         a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

         b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

         a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

         b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.

DATE: August 9, 2007                     /S/ SEAN MCDONNELL
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         SEAN MCDONNELL, CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
# EUR-Lex - 12006E132 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12006E132

**Treaty establishing the European Community (consolidated version) - Part Three - Community policies - TITLE IX - Common commercial policy - Article 132 **

*
Official Journal C 321 E , 29/12/2006 P. 0104 - 0104 Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0090 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0237 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0044 - Consolidated version (EEC Treaty - no official publication available) *

Article 132

1. Without prejudice to obligations undertaken by them within the framework of other international organisations, Member States shall progressively harmonise the systems whereby they grant aid for exports to third countries, to the extent necessary to ensure that competition between undertakings of the Community is not distorted.

On a proposal from the Commission, the Council shall, acting by a qualified majority, issue any directives needed for this purpose.

2. The preceding provisions shall not apply to such a drawback of customs duties or charges having equivalent effect nor to such a repayment of indirect taxation including turnover taxes, excise duties and other indirect taxes as is allowed when goods are exported from a Member State to a third country, in so far as such a drawback or repayment does not exceed the amount imposed, directly or indirectly, on the products exported.

--------------------------------------------------
[No. 1428.]

#### Curtis v. The City of Pueblo.

1. Limitation — Pleading—Pbactice.

The statute of limitation may not be pleaded by an amendment to the answer after the issues have been made up.

2. Opinion Followed.

Following the opinion in the case of *The Shutt Investment Co. v. The City of Pueblo, ante,*p. 432 this case is reversed.

*Error to the District Court of Pueblo County.*

Messrs. Arrington & McAliney, and Mr. John M. Waldron, for plaintiff in error.

Mr. E. E. Hubbell, Mr. M. J. Galligan and Mr. S. H. White, for defendant in error.

Bissell, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is a suit by the plaintiff in error against the city of Pueblo to recover damages for the injuries done to his property by the construction of the viaduct on C street. The case is precisely the same on all material questions as that of the Shutt Investment Company. Counsel agree that the record presents no other questions than those decided in the latter cause, and that the decision in the one case, our conclusions being as therein expressed, will necessarily be decisive of this. It is quite true there was no evidence introduced by the city and judgment was rendered on a nonsuit, the court holding that the plaintiff was not entitled to judgment on his award making proof of all other facts on which issue was taken. The amended answer presented no legitimate issue, because as we decided in *Owers v. The Olathe Silver Mining Co.,*6 Colo. App. 1, the statute of limitations may not be pleaded as a defense by an amendment to the answer after the issues have *447been made up. With this question removed, it necessarily follows that the plaintiff was entitled to a judgment on his award unless the city was able to make out a defense by proof of the denials of the other allegations in the complaint.

Following the decision in the prior case, this judgment will be reversed.

*Reversed.*

Wilson, J., specially concurring.
SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NINETY-EIGHTH CONGRESS 

Convened January 3, 1983 

FIRST SESSION { 

SECOND SESSION { 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Tuesday, March 1, 1983 

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF WILLIAM F. HILDENBRAND, 

SECRETARY OF THE SENATE 

By Gerald A. Hackett, Executive Clerk 
1 

TREATIES 

Calendar Treaty Subject 

No. Doc. No. 

1 Ex. B, Montreal Aviation Protocols Nos. 3 and 4 

95-1 

2 97-19 Constitution of the United Nations 

Industrial Development Organization. 

3 98-1 :Amendment to the 1972 Protocol to the 1928 

Convention Concerning International 

Expositions. 

NOMINATIONS 

Calendar Message Nominee, Office, And Predecessor 

No. No. 

[HEW REPORTS] 

Reported 

Bv 

Feb 10 83 Reported 

favorably, by Mr. Percy, 

Committee on Foreign 

Relations, with conditions 

to the resolution of 

ratification (Printed 

report-Ex. Rept. 98-1) 

Feb 10 83 Reported 

favorably, by Mr. Percy, 

Committee on Foreign 

Relations, with 

understandings to the 

resolution of ratification 

(Printed report--Ex. Rept. 

98-2) 

Feb 23 83 Reported 

favorably, by Mr. Percy, 

Committee on Foreign 

Relations. without 

amendment to the 

resolution of ratification 

(Printed report-Ex. Rept. 

98-3) 

Reported 

Bv 
2 

-

Calendar Message Nominee, Off ice, And Predecessor Reported 

* 

* 

No. No. Bv -

DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

30 5 Lewis Arthur Iambs, of Arizona, to be Feb 28, 83 Mr. Percy, 

Ambassador Extraordinary and Committee on Foreign 

Plenipotentiary of the United States of Relations, without printed 

America to Colombia. report. 

RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD 

31 18 Robert A. Gielow, of Illinois, to be a Feb 28, 83 Mr. Hatch, 

Member of the Railroad Retirement Board Committee on Labor and 

for the term of five years from August 29, Human Resources, without 

1982. vice William P. Adams term expired. printed rePOrt. .. *S1gnJf1es nominee's commitment to respond to requests to appear and testify before any duly 

constituted committee of the Senate. 
3 

NOMINATIONS PLACED ON THE SECRETARY'S DESK IN THE FOREIGN SERVICE 

Foreign Service nominations beginning Frank Bennett Kimball, and ending John R. Westley, which 

nominations were received by the Senate on February 9, 1983, and appeared in the Congressional 

Record of February 14, 1983.
# EUR-Lex - 12008E031 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008E031

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - PART THREE: UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS - TITLE II: FREE MOVEMENT OF GOODS - Chapter 1: The customs union - Article 31 (ex Article 26 TEC) **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0060 - 0060 *

Article 31

(ex Article 26 TEC)

Common Customs Tariff duties shall be fixed by the Council on a proposal from the Commission.

--------------------------------------------------
#### Lola C. Szymanski and Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company of Hartford, Connecticut, a corporation of the State of Connecticut, v. James F. Hearn, Coroner of New Castle County and State of Delaware, Grace C. Buchanan, Trustee Ad Litem, and Morris Kreitz, Lamon Kreitz, Warren C. Kreitz and Albert Kreitz, Co-partners trading and doing business as Morris Kreitz and Sons.

*(October*12, 1948.)

Layton, J., sitting.

*Victor J. Colombo*for Petitioners.

*John P. Sinclair*(of Southerland, Berl and Potter) for Defendants.

Superior Court for New Castle County,

Civil Action, 1948.

*469Layton, J.

An examination of the authorities discloses that, until comparatively recently, when judgments were entered upon warrant of attorney for a penalty, the condition being for the performance of some collateral undertaking rather than for a sum certain, Defendant’s only recourse was to remain idle until such time as execution might be issued for a larger amount than the damages sustained, at which time he could seek relief in Equity. Woolley, Delaware Practice, Sec. 792. *Staats v. Herbert,*4 *Del.Ch.*508. To me, such a practice seems peculiarly inept. Moreover, in many cases it operates as a hardship upon the Defendant. I am of the *470opinion that, upon application in a proper case, the Court in which the judgment is entered, should have the inherent power to order it opened for the purpose of ascertaining the correct amount due. There is authority for the conclusion here reached. *Rhoads v. Mitchell,*4 Terry 343, 47 A. *2d*174.

The judgment here will be re-opened and the issue as to the amount due submitted either to the Court or jury as counsel may elect.
Tampa Electric Company Polk 2-5 Conversion ProjectProposed GHG BACT Emission Limits(4/10/2013)AnnualOperating Operating Case Gross Hours ofCase Description Output Operation Averaging Monitoring Compliance(MW) (lb/hr) (lb/MWh) (hr/yr) Time Frequency MethodA. Combined Cycle - Natural Gas (4x1 CC Unit)CC-10 75% load/59°F ambient 837 733,252 876 4,760CC-14100% load/EC/DB/90°F ambient1,127 990,300 879 4,000877(a)12-Month Rolling ContinuousCO2CEMS, 40 CFR Part 98(b)B. Combined Cycle - ULSD Fuel Oil (4x1 CC Unit)CC-25100% load/EC/59°F ambient1,125 1,388,666 1,235750(c)1,235(d)3-Hour Annual TestCO2CEMS, 40 CFR Part 98(b)C. Simple Cycle - Natural Gas (Each SCCT)SC-5100% load/EC/59°F ambient174 230,329 1,320900(e)1,320(d)3-Hour Annual TestCO2CEMS, 40 CFR Part 98(b)D. Simple Cycle - ULSD Fuel Oil (Each SCCT)SC-16100% load/EC/59°F ambient186 248,476 1,334375(e)1,334(d)3-Hour Annual TestCO2CEMS, 40 CFR Part 98(b)EC = evaporative coolingDB = duct burner firing(a)Excluding CT loads less than 50% of design capacity.(b)40 CFR Part 98 emission factors for methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O).(c)Average hours per year per CT of which no more than an average of 375 hours per year may be in simple cycle mode.(d)Corrected to ISO conditions (59°F, 14.7 psia, and 60% relative humidity).(e)Average hours per year per CT. Also, one-time special allocation of 3,480 average hours per CT for events when combined cyclesteam turbine generator is unavailable.Sources: B&V, 2013.ECT, 2013.TEC, 2013.Proposed BACT LimitsCO2eEmissions(lb/MWh)CO2e Emissions
EXHIBIT 10.26



                                    SCHEDULE

                    Information on 14 substantially identical
                 Deeds of Trust (with respect to Exhibit 10.16)
                          dated as of December 12, 2000
                  with First Union National Bank as Beneficiary

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                                                     Principal Amount of
Apartment Property                              Grantor                                     Debt Secured
------------------                              -------                                     ------------
<S>                                             <C>                                          <C>

Arbor Trace                                     CRIT-VA, Inc.                                  5,000,000
Virginia Beach, VA

Ashley Park                                     CRIT-VA, Inc.                                  9,500,000
Richmond, VA

The Gables                                      CRIT-VA, Inc.                                  8,000,000
Glen Allen, VA

Trolley Square                                  CRIT-VA, Inc.                                  9,500,000
Richmond, VA

Trophy Chase                                    CRIT-VA, Inc.                                 15,000,000
Charlottesville, VA

Heatherwood                                     CRIT-NC II, LLC                               16,250,000
Charlotte, NC

Summerwalk                                      CRIT-NC II, LLC                                6,000,000
Concord, NC

The Arbors on Forest Ridge                      CAC Limited Partnership                        6,250,000
Bedford, TX

Brandywine Park (Cutter's Point)                CAC Limited Partnership                        6,250,000
Richardson, TX

</TABLE>


<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                                                     Principal Amount of
Apartment Property                              Grantor                                     Debt Secured
------------------                              -------                                     ------------
<S>                                             <C>                                          <C>

Eagle Crest                                     CAC Limited Partnership                       15,000,000
Irving, TX

Remington Hills at Las Colinas                  CAC Limited Partnership                       14,250,000
Irving, TX

Sierra Ridge                                    CAC Limited Partnership                        4,750,000
San Antonio, TX

Timberglen                                      CAC Limited Partnership                        9,500,000
Dallas, TX

Toscana                                         CAC Limited Partnership                        5,250,000
Dallas, TX

</TABLE>
FI LED U. S . COURT OF AP PE ALS E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT M ar c h 13, 2006 T HOM AS K. KAHN CL E RK [ DO NO T P UB L I S H]
I N THE UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS F O R T H E E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT

________________________ N o. 05- 12602 N on -A rgum entC al endar

________________________ D . C . D ocketN o. 04 -003 36 -C R -S UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff-A pp el l ee , v ersu s C H R I S T O P H E R E D W A R D P E R S A L L , a/k/aC h r is to p h e rP e r s a ll, D e fe n d a n t- A p p e lla n t.

________________________ A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt for the N orthern D i stri ctof A l abam a.

_________________________ ( M ar c h 13, 2006) B efo re A N D E R S O N , B IR C H an d H IL L , C i rcu i tJu d g es. P E R C U R I A M: C hr i s t ophe rE dw a r d P e r s a l l a ppe a l s hi s s e ve nty ( 70) m onth s e nt e nc e forAlthough c ounts one and two addresse d the same crime under Section 2252A(a)(5) (B ), 1 Persall’s possession occurre d both beforeand af ter a statutory amendment that lengthened the maxi mum statutory

penalty for the crime. In sentenc ing him, the district court expresslystated that sentenc e wa s imposed under 2 the SentencingReform Ac t of 1984, as modified by the Supreme Court de cision in Booke r . R6- 16. 2 p o s s e s s io n o f

c h ild p o r n o g r a p h y , 1 8 U .S .C . § 2 2 5 2 A ( a ) ( 5 ) ( B ) , r e c e ip t o f c h ild por nogr a phy , 18 U . S . C . § 2252A ( a ) ( 2) ( A ) , a nd pos s e s s i on of c hi l d por nogr a phy unde rS e c t i on 2252A ( a ) ( 5) ( B ) ( a s a m e nde d) . T he s ol e i s s ue r a i s e d on a ppe a l by 1 P er sa l l i s a B oo ke ri ss ue, i . e. , thatthe di stri ctcourterre d b y e nh anci ng hi s s ent ence i n e xc e s s of

the gui de l i ne s r a nge forhi s c r i m e by us i ng fa c t s nota dm i tt e d t o by h im a n d n o t fo u n d b y aju r y . B ook e rv . W as hi ngton , 12 5 S . C t . 73 8 (20 05 ). T hi s i s s ue i s e nt i r e l y w i thoutm e r i ta s P e r s a l l w a s s e nt e nc e d on A pr i l 21, 2 0 0 5 , u n d e rth e p o s t- B oo ke radvi sory gu i del i nes a nd no tthe pre- B oo ke rm andat ory gu i del i nes s ys t em . A ft er B oo ke r , “ the use of e xtra -ver di ctenhancem ent s i n an 2 advi sory gu i del i nes s ys t em i s notun const i tut i on al . ” Uni te d State s v . C hau , 426 F .3 d 1 3 1 8 , 1 3 2 3 ( 1 1 C ir . 2 0 0 5 ) . th T h e r e fo r e , P e r s a ll’s a r g u m e n t fa ils u n d e rth e p r e c e d e n t o f th is c ir c u it. See al s o Uni te d State s v . W i ni nge ar , 4 2 2 F .3 d 1 2 4 1 , 1 2 4 4 ( 1 1 C ir . 2 0 0 5 ) ; Uni ted th State s v . D unc an , 400 F . 3d 1297, 13044- 05 ( 11 C i r . 2005) . F i ndi ng no e rr or , the th
s e nt e nc i ng j udgm e ntof

the di s tr i c tc our ta s t o P e r s a l l i s a f f i r m e d. AF F I R ME D.
# EUR-Lex - 12007L/AFI/DCL/19 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12007L/AFI/DCL/19

**Treaty of Lisbon amending the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Community, signed at Lisbon, 13 December 2007 - A. Declarations concerning provisions of the Treaties - 19. Declaration on Article 3 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union **

*
Official Journal 306 , 17/12/2007 P. 0257 - 0257 *

19. Declaration on Article 3 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

The Conference agrees that, in its general efforts to eliminate inequalities between women and men, the Union will aim in its different policies to combat all kinds of domestic violence. The Member States should take all necessary measures to prevent and punish these criminal acts and to support and protect the victims.

--------------------------------------------------
# EUR-Lex - 12008E251 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008E251

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - PART SIX: INSTITUTIONAL AND FINANCIAL PROVISIONS - TITLE I: INSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS - Chapter 1: The institutions - Section 5: The Court of Justice of the European Union - Article 251 (ex Article 221 TEC) **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0157 - 0157 *

Article 251

(ex Article 221 TEC)

The Court of Justice shall sit in chambers or in a Grand Chamber, in accordance with the rules laid down for that purpose in the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union.

When provided for in the Statute, the Court of Justice may also sit as a full Court.

--------------------------------------------------
Date of 

report 

1970 

June 30 

~tuutr nf tqt luitrb itutts 

NINETY-FIRST CONGRESS 

F S {Convened January 3, 1969 

IRST ESSION Ad d D b 23 1969 journe ecem er , 

S S { Convened January 19, 1970 

ECOND ESSION 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Prepared under the direction of FRANCIS R. V ALEO, Secretary of the Senate 

By GERALD A. HAcKETT, Executive Clerk 

Tuesday, July 14, 1970 

NOMINATION 

Calendar Message 

No No 

Name ofnommee Office Predecessor 

INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION 

106 154 W. Donald Brewer, of An Interstate Commerce Paul J. T1erney. 

Colorado. Comm1ss10ner for the 

term of 7 years expmng 

Dec. 31, 1976 

48-022--70--No 19T 

U S bOVERNMe:NT PRINTING OFFlC£ 1970
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 98-4059

___________

Franki Mayer, *

*

Plaintiff - Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of South Dakota.

Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of *

Social Security, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Defendant - Appellee. *

___________

Submitted: June 18, 1999

Filed: July 26, 1999

___________

Before LOKEN, BRIGHT, and ROSS, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Franki Mayer applied for Social Security disability and supplemental security

income benefits, alleging an amended disability onset date of April 1, 1995. After a

hearing, the Commissioner’s administrative law judge decided that Mayer is not

entitled to benefits, finding that her bipolar disorder is a severe non-exertional

impairment, that it only slightly limits her ability to work, and that Mayer retains the

residual functional capacity to perform her past relevant work as truck driver, sorter,

bartender, and cashier. After the Commissioner’s Appeals Council denied Mayer’s
1The HONORABLE RICHARD H. BATTEY, United States District Judge for

the District of South Dakota.

-2-

request for review of the ALJ’s adverse decision, she commenced this action for

judicial review of the Commissioner’s final decision. See 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g),

1383(c)(3). 

The district court1 granted summary judgment in favor of the Commissioner,

concluding that the ALJ’s decision is supported by substantial evidence in the

administrative record as a whole. Mayer now appeals to this court, arguing the record

does not support the ALJ’s decision because five mental health professionals have

opined that Mayer’s psychological condition imposes substantial and therefore

disabling restrictions on her ability to work. After careful review of the administrative

record as a whole, we agree with the district court that the ALJ’s decision is supported

by the requisite substantial evidence. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. Rule 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
EXHIBIT 23



                         Consent of Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 33-38623) pertaining to the Health Risk Management,  Inc.  Non-Incentive
Stock Option Plan, the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-38624) pertaining
to the Health Risk Management, Inc. 1990 Stock Option Plan, and the Registration
Statements (Form S-8 No. 33-60390 and Form S-8 No. 333-34497)  pertaining to the
Health Risk Management,  Inc. 1992 Long-Term  Incentive Plan of our report dated
September 23, 1998, with respect to the  consolidated  financial  statements and
schedule of Health Risk  Management,  Inc.  included in this Annual Report (Form
10-K) for the year ended June 30, 1998.



Minneapolis, Minnesota
September 23, 1998
Date of 

report 

1968 

Apr. 25 

~rttatr nf tqr luitt~ itntrs 

NINETIETH CONGRESS 

FIRST SESSION {Convened January ro, rg67 

Adjourned December 15, rg67 

SECOND SESSION {Convened January 15, rg68 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Prepared unde1' the direction of FRANCIS R. VALEO, Secretary of the Senate 

By GERALD A. HACKETT, Executive Clerk 

Friday, April 26, 1968 

NOMINATION 

Calendar Message Name ofnommee Office I Predecessor 

No No 

DEPARTMENT OF 

THE INTERIOR 

292 103 Edward Weinberg, of Solic1tor of the Depart- Frank Barry, resigned. 

Maryland. ment of the Intenor. 

85-022-68- No 147