alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1150.13 Participation on petition. ( a ) By petitioning the judge, any person may be permitted to participate in the proceedings when he/she claims an interest in the proceedings and may contribute materially to their proper disposition. A complainant shall be permitted to participate in the proceeding when he/she petitions the judge.
( b ) The judge may, in his/her discretion, determine the extent of participation of petitioners, including as an intervening party or participant. The judge may, in his/her discretion, limit participation to submitting documents and briefs, or permit the introduction of evidence and questioning of witnesses.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 604 

To direct the Secretary of Health and Human Services to amend the mission 

statement of the Food and Drug Administration. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 1, 2023 

Mr. MANCHIN (for himself and Mr. BRAUN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Health and Human Services to 

amend the mission statement of the Food and Drug 

Administration. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Changing the Culture 

5 of the FDA Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. MISSION STATEMENT OF THE FOOD AND DRUG AD7 MINISTRATION. 

8 The Secretary of Health and Human Services, acting 

9 through the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, shall 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 604 IS

1 amend the mission statement of the Food and Drug Ad2 ministration to include the following statement: ‘‘The 

3 FDA is also responsible for protecting the public health 

4 by strongly considering the danger of addiction and over5 dose death associated with prescription opioid medications 

6 when approving these medications and when regulating 

7 the manufacturing, marketing, and distribution of opioid 

8 medications.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
```

[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 203 (Friday, October 20, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 62019]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-8828]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting

October 13, 2006.

Time and Date: 10 a.m., Thursday, October 26, 2006.

Place: The Richard V. Backley Hearing Room, 9th Floor, 601 New Jersey 
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC.

Status: Open.

Matters to be Considered: The Commission will consider and act upon the 
following in open session: Secretary of Labor v. Hanson Aggregates New 
York, Inc., Docket No. YORK 2005-22-M. (Issues include whether the 
Administrative Law Judge erred when he granted the Secretary of Labor's 
motion for summary decision and found that the operator violated the 
requirement of 30 CFR 56.14211(c) that a raised component of mobile 
equipment must be secured to prevent accidental lowering when persons 
working on or around the equipment are exposed to the hazard of 
accidental lowering of the component).
    Any person attending this meeting who requires special 
accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such s sign language 
interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those needs, 
subject to 29 CFR 2706.150(a)(3) and 2706.160(d).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jean Ellen, (202) 434-9950/(202) 708-
9300 for TDD Relay/1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

Jean H. Ellen,
Chief Docket Clerk.
[FR Doc. 06-8828 Filed 10-18-06; 12:02 pm]
BILLING CODE 6735-01-M
```
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03
- 13
- 00816
- CV

D. K., Sr., Appellant

v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

FROM THE 35TH DISTRICT COURT OF MILLS COUNTY, NO. 12
- 10
- 6415, THE HONORABLE STEPHEN ELLIS, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

Appellant D. K. filed his notice of appeal on November 12, 2013 . The appellate record was complete January 2, 2014 , making appellant = s brief due January 22, 2014 . To date, appellant = s brief has not been filed

Amend ments to the rules of judicial administration acce lerate the final disposition
of appeals from suits for termination of parental rights. See Tex. R. Jud. Admin. 6.2(a) (providing 180 days fo r court’s final disposition). The accelerated schedule requires greater compliance with briefing deadlines. Therefore we order counsel to file appellant = s brief no later than February 1 8 , 2014 . If the brief is not filed by that date, counsel may be required to show cause why he should not be held in contempt of court

.

It is ordered on January 31, 2014

.

Before Justices Puryear, Goodwin and Field
Order entered October 8, 2019

In The



## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 19

- 00981

- CV

IN RE JESSE CELEDON GAMBOA, Relator

O rigi nal Proceeding from the 292nd Judicial District C ourt

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F86

- 78614

- HV



### O RDER

Bas e d on t he Cou r t’s opinion of this dat e , we DENY relator’s August 19, 2019 petition

for writ of mandamus

.

/s/ LANA MYERS

JUSTICE
§ 3.17 What regulations apply to swimming areas and beaches? ( a ) The superintendent may designate areas as swimming areas or swimming beaches in accordance with §§ 1.5 and 1.7 of this chapter.
( b ) Within designated swimming areas, the use of a surfboard or similar rigid device is prohibited.
( c ) The superintendent may prohibit the use or possession of flotation devices, glass containers, kites, or incompatible activities in swimming areas or swimming beaches in accordance with §§ 1.5 and 1.7 of this chapter.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 2, 2019

No. 04

- 19

- 00119

- CV

INFINITY COUNTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY

, Appellant

v.

Michael TATSCH

, Appellee

From the 216th Judicial District Court, Gillespie County, Texas

Trial Court No. 12977

Honorable N. Keith Williams, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Sitting: Luz Elena D. Chapa , Justi ce

Ir ene Rios, Justice

Beth Watkins, Justice

Appellee has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. We order

appellant, Infinity County Mutual Insurance Company, to file a resp onse to the motion to dismiss

with its appellant’s brief, which is due August 13, 2019. If the appellant fails to comply with this

order, this appeal may be dismissed without further notice. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3(a), (c).

_____ ____________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 2nd day of August, 2019

.

___________________________________ K eith E. H ottle

, Clerk of Court
SUPREME COURT.

#### Elizabeth E. Lillie agt. William Sherman *et al.*

A decree, in 1870, of a *mortgage foreclosure,*upon a mortgage given in 1860, directing that the plaintiff be paid the sum of-dollars, from the proceeds of the sale, means “ dollars” in the present legal tender currency of the United States.

If the plaintiff is entitled to payment in *gold,*the error in the decree is a judicial one and cannot be corrected on *motion.*

*Monroe Special Term,*March, 1870.

Action brought to foreclose a mortgage executed in 1860. A decree of foreclosure was made in January, 1870, directing a sale of the premises by the sheriff of W^tyne county, and the payment to the plaintiff, from the avjails, of $3,555 92, and .costs. s

Pending the notice of sale on such decree, the plaititiff made a motion to amend the decree by directing payment to the plaintiff in gold or its equivalent.

The second mortgagee opposed the motion.

Henry R. Durfee, *for the*motion,

*Cited Hepburn*agt. *Griswold, U. S. supreme court, March*1870.

Charles McLouth, *opposed,*

Argued the points:

I. The court has not the power to amend a judgment! or decree in substance. *(Code, %*173.)

II. The error, if any, is a judicial one, .which cannot' be corrected on motion. *(Hotaling*agt. *Marsh,*14 *Abb.,*161 ; *288*Clark*agt. *Hall,*7 *Paige, 382; N. Y. Ice Co.*agt. *N. W. Ins. Co., 32 Barb.,*534; *Barnard*agt. *Bruce,*21 *How., 360.)*

III. If any motion could be sustained, it should be a motion for a rehearing, alleging mistake, &c. *(Same cases.)*

IV. The mortgage debt, which by the case of *Hepburn vgt. Griswold,*might have been payable in gold, merged in the judgment. The amount payable on that judgment may be satisfied with any currency which would pay a debt contracted at the date of the judgment. *(Stackpole*agt. *Robbins,*47 *Barb., 212; Suydam*agt. *Barber, 18 H. Y., 468; Goodrich*agt. *Dunbar.*17 *Barb.,*644.)

Dwight, J.

I think the motion must be denied. The judgment adjudicated that there was due to the plaintiff the sum of—— dollars, and directs that amount to be paid to her from the proceeds of the sale. There is no ambiguity in the terms of the decree. The term *“*dollars” there used, meant only dollars in the present legal tender currency of the United States. If upon the facts of the case, the plaintiff was entitled to a greater sum, or to payment in a currency of a greater value, the error in the decree was a judicial one, and cannot be corrected on motion. *(Hotaling*agt. *Marsh, 14 Abb.,*161; *Clark*agt. *Hall,*7 *Paige,*38.2; *N. Y. Ice Co.*agt. *N. W. Ins. Co., 32 Barb.,*534; *Barnard*agt. *Bruee, 21 How.,*360.)

Motion denied with $10 costs.
kld-ex108_12.htm



 

Exhibit 10.8

 

 

 

May 5, 2020

 

Krystina Jones

 

 

Dear Ms. Jones:

 

You were previously granted (i) an award (the “RSU Award”) of 9,878 restricted stock units (the “RSUs”) pursuant to the terms of the KLDiscovery Inc. 2019 Incentive Award Plan (the “Plan”) and an award agreement thereunder (the “RSU Award Agreement”) and (ii) an option (the “Option”) to purchase 29,913 shares of KLDiscovery Inc.’s (the “Company”) common stock pursuant to the terms of the Plan and an award agreement thereunder (the “Option Award Agreement”).  As discussed, set forth below are the terms of our mutual agreement regarding changes in certain terms of the RSUs and the Option granted to you.

 

Effective as of the date hereof, you agree to forfeit, for no compensation, 3,000 of the RSUs subject to the RSU Award (the “Forfeited RSUs”) so that the shares otherwise subject to the Forfeited RSUs may be allocated to other participants in the Plan.  Furthermore, effective as of the date hereof, you agree to forfeit, for no compensation, a portion of the Option with respect to 6,000 shares of Company common stock subject to the Option (the “Forfeited Option Portion”) so that the shares otherwise subject to the Forfeited Option Portion may be allocated to other participants in the Plan. You will cease to have any rights with respect to the Forfeited RSUs and Forfeited Option Portion as of the date hereof.  The RSU Award Agreement is hereby amended so that the “Number of RSUs” set forth therein shall equal 6,878 (the “Retained RSUs”), and the Option Award Agreement is hereby amended so that the total number of “Shares Subject to the Option” shall equal 23,913 (the “Retained Option Portion”), all to be reduced ratably from the vesting tranche. 

 

Except as expressly set forth in this letter agreement, the RSU Award Agreement, the Option Award Agreement, and the terms of your other contracts and compensatory arrangements with the Company remain unchanged and continue in full force and effect in accordance with and subject to their terms.  For the avoidance of doubt, the Retained RSUs will continue to be subject to the terms of the Plan and the RSU Agreement, and the Retained Option Portion will continue to be subject to the terms of the Plan and the Option Agreement.

 

This letter agreement will be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware, without giving effect to any choice or conflict of laws provision or rule that would cause the application of the laws of any other jurisdiction.

 

Please indicate your agreement to the foregoing by returning a countersigned copy of this letter to me.  

 

Sincerely,

 

/s/ Andy Southam 

 

Andy Southam 

General Counsel 

Accepted and agreed:

 

/s/ Krystina Jones

Krystina Jones

 

KLDiscovery Inc

8201 Greensboro Drive, Suite 300kldiscovery.com

McLean, VA 22102
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-15-00383-CR

Tina Gail Marek

v.

The State of Texas

On appeal from the

24th District Court of Victoria County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 15-02-28509-A

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

September 2, 2016.
# EUR-Lex - 12007P028 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12007P028

**Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - TITLE IV - SOLIDARITY - Article 28 - Right of collective bargaining and action **

*
Official Journal 303 , 14/12/2007 P. 0008 - 0008 *

Article 28

Right of collective bargaining and action

Workers and employers, or their respective organisations, have, in accordance with Union law and national laws and practices, the right to negotiate and conclude collective agreements at the appropriate levels and, in cases of conflicts of interest, to take collective action to defend their interests, including strike action.

--------------------------------------------------
# tab01
Case 16-29069 Doc 4 Filed 09/12/16 Entered 09/12/16 14:56:33 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2
Case 16-29069 Doc 4 Filed 09/12/16 Entered 09/12/16 14:56:33 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2
§ 261.58 Occupancy and use. When provided by an order, the following are prohibited: ( a ) Camping for a period longer than allowed by the order.
( b ) Entering or using a developed recreation site or portion thereof.
( c ) Entering or remaining in a campground during night periods prescribed in the order except for persons who are occupying such campgrounds.
( d ) Occupying a developed recreation site with prohibited camping equipment prescribed by the order.
( e ) Camping.
( f ) Using a campsite or other area described in the order by more than the number of users allowed by the order.
( g ) Parking or leaving a vehicle in violation of posted instructions.
( h ) Parking or leaving a vehicle outside a parking space assigned to one's own camp unit.
( i ) Possessing, parking or leaving more than two vehicles, except motorcycles or bicycles per camp unit.
( j ) Being publicly nude.
( k ) Entering or being in a body of water.
( l ) Being in the area after sundown or before sunrise.
( m ) Discharging a firearm, air rifle, or gas gun.
( n ) Possessing or operating a motorboat.
( o ) Water skiing.
( p ) Storing or leaving a boat or raft.
( q ) Operating any watercraft in excess of a posted speed limit.
( r ) Launching a boat except at a designated launching ramp.
( s ) Possessing, storing, or transporting any bird, fish, or other animal or parts thereof, as specified in the order.
( t ) Possessing, storing, or transporting any part of a tree or other plant, as specified in the order.
( u ) Being in the area between 10 p.m. and 6 a.m. except a person who is camping or who is visiting a person camping in that area.
( v ) Hunting or fishing.
( w ) Possessing or transporting any motor or mechanical device capable of propelling a watercraft through water by any means.
( x ) Using any wheel, roller, or other mechanical device for the overland transportation of any watercraft.
( y ) Landing of aircraft, or dropping or picking up any material, supplies, or person by means of an aircraft, including a helicopter.
( z ) Entering or being on lands or waters within the boundaries of a component of the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System.
( aa ) Riding, hitching, tethering or hobbling a horse or other saddle or pack animal in violation of posted instructions.
( bb ) Possessing a beverage which is defined as an alcoholic beverage by State law.
( cc ) Possessing or storing any food or refuse, as specified in the order.
( dd ) [Reserved]
( ee ) Depositing any body waste in caves except into receptacles provided for that purpose.
[42 FR 2597, Jan. 14, 1977, as amended at 42 FR 35959, July 13, 1977; 43 FR 32136, July 25, 1978; 46 FR 33521, June 30, 1981; 52 FR 19347, May 22, 1987; 59 FR 31152, June 17, 1994]
EXHIBIT 32.3


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                   AS ADDED BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Heartland,  Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period  ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Jerry Gruenbaum,
Interim Chief  Financial  Officer,  General Counsel and Director of the Company,
certifies,  pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.ss.  1350,  as  added  by  ss.  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     A.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     B.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.


                                          By: /s/ Jerry Gruenbaum
                                          -----------------------------------
                                          Jerry Gruenbaum
                                          Interim Chief Financial Officer,
                                          General Counsel & Director
                                          August 24, 2004

A signed  original  of this  written  statement  required  by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 ("Section  906"), or other document  authenticating,
acknowledging,  or otherwise  adopting the signature  that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906,
has been  provided to  Inmternaqtional  Wireless,  Inc.  and will be retained by
Inmternaqtional  Wireless,  Inc. and  furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas September 2, 2021 No. 04-21-00334-CV IN THE INTEREST OF L.J.C., X.I.C., Z.S.C., E.A.C., L.C.C., AND A.R.G

. From the 407th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020PA00922 Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R This is an accelerated appeal of an order terminating the appellant’s parental rights, which must be disposed of by this Court within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal is filed. T EX . R. J UD . A DMIN . 6.2. The reporter’s record was due August 20, 2021, and the appellant is presumed indigent. Court reporter Elva G. Chapa has filed a notification of late reporter’s record, requesting an extension until September 13, 2021 to file the reporter’s record. We GRANT her request and ORDER her to file the reporter’s record on or before September 13, 2021. Court reporter Blanca Espericueta has also filed a notification of late reporter’s record, requesting an extension to September 7, 2021. We GRANT her request and ORDER her to file the reporter’s record on or before September 7, 2021. Given the time constraints governing the disposition of this appeal, further requests for extensions of time will be disfavored.

_________________________________ Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 2nd day of September, 2021.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 32.01

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), and Section 1350 of
Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), Gary
L. Bloom, Chief Executive Officer of VERITAS Software Corporation (the
"Company"), and Edwin J. Gillis, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each
hereby certifies that:

1.    The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31,
      2004, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.01 (the
      "Quarterly Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      of the Exchange Act, and

2.    The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of the 11th
day of June, 2004.

/s/ Gary L. Bloom                       /s/ Edwin J. Gillis
------------------------------          -----------------------------
Gary L. Bloom                           Edwin J. Gillis
Chief Executive Officer                 Chief Financial Officer

This certification which accompanies the Quarterly Report, is not deemed filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by
reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the
Exchange Act (whether made before or after the date of the Quarterly Report),
irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 193 (Thursday, October 5, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58836-58840]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-8508]



[[Page 58836]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Transmittal No. 06-52]


36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text 
of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to 
fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 
July 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. J. Hurd, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 604-
6575.
    The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives, Transmittal 06-52 with attached transmittal and policy 
justification.

    Dated: September 28, 2006.
C.R. Choate,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M

[[Page 58837]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN05OC06.031


[[Page 58838]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN05OC06.032


[[Page 58839]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN05OC06.033


[[Page 58840]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN05OC06.034

[FR Doc. 06-8508 Filed 10-4-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-C