T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T S W A R A N L O O M B A , a. k. a. S w ar an S i ngh, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 07- 71632 A ge nc yN o. A 072- 681- 754 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o a r do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d Jul y19, 2010 ** B e f o r e : B . F L E T C H E R , R E I N H A R D T , an dW A R D L A W , C ir c u it Ju d g e s . S w a r a n L oom ba , ana t i ve and c i t i z e n of I ndi a , pe t i t i ons f

orr e vi e w of

the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ (“ B IA ”) order di sm i ss i ng hi s app ea l fr om an i m m i gr a t i on j udge ’ s ( “ I J ” ) r e m ova l or de r . O urj ur i s di c t i on i s gove rne d by 8 U . S . C . § 1 2 5 2 . W e rev i ew d e n o v o q u est i o n s o f l aw , i n cl u d i n g du e p ro cess 

# FI LED AU G 02 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS07- 71632 2 c h a lle n g e s , V

a s q u ez - Za v a la v . A s h c r o ft , 324 F . 3d 1105, 1107 ( 9th C i r . 2003) , and r e v ie w f o rab u s e o f

d is c r e tio n th e d e n ia l o f am o tio n to r e m an d , Movsisi an v. A s h c r o ft , 39 5 F . 3d 10 95 , 10 98 (9th C i r. 20 05 ). W e deny i n p artand d i sm i ss i n p art th e p e titio n f

o rr e v ie w . L oom bac ont e nds the I Js houl d ha ve t e rm i na t e d pr oc e e di ngs f orl a c k of pr os e c ut i on due t o t e c hni c a l de f e c t s i n the c har gi ng doc um e nt s . W e a gr e e w i th the B IA thatthe IJdi d n oterr i n g rant i ng the go vernm ent ’ s r equestfor acont i nu ance to r e m e d yth e s e a lle g e dd e f e c ts . See 8 C .F .R . § § 1 0 0 3 .2 9 , 1 0 0 3 .3 0 , 1 2 4 0 .1 0 ( e ) . L oom ba ’ s c ont e nt i on tha tthe a ge nc yvi ol a t e d i t s ow n r e gul a t i ons f a i l s be c aus e he is u n ab le to d e m o n s tr a te p r e ju d ic e . See Koh l iv. G on zales , 473 F . 3d 1061, 1066- 67 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 7 ) ( “W h e n p r e s e n te dw ith a lle g a tio n s th a t an a g e n c yh a s v io la te dits o w n re g u lati o n . . . th e c laim an t m u st sh o w h e w as p re ju d iced b y th e a g en cy ’s m is ta k e .” ) . W e l a c k j ur i s di c t i on t o c ons i de rL oom ba ’ s c ont e nt i on tha tthe gove rnm e nt e x c e e d e dth e s c o p e o f

th e I J ’s o r d e rc o n tin u in g p r o c e e d in g s b e c au s e h e f a ile dto r a is e it b e f

o r e th e B I A . Se e B a rr o n v . A s h c r o ft , 35 8 F . 3d 67 4, 67 8 (9th C i r. 20 04 ). L oo m ba cont ends the IJvi ol at ed du e proces s by denyi ng hi s r equestfor an e vi de nt i a ryhe a r i ng. C ontr a ryt o L oom ba ’ s c ont e nt i on, the pr oc e e di ngs w e r e not

“ so fu n d am en t al l y u n fai r th at[h e] w as p rev en t edfro m reaso n ab l y p resen t i n g [h i s]07- 71632 3 ca se . ” Co lm e n a rv . I

NS , 21 0 F . 3d 96 7, 97 1 (9th C i r. 20 00 ) ( ci t at i on om i tt ed). M or e ove r , L oom baf

a i l e d t o de m ons tr a t e tha ta n e vi de nt i aryhe ar i ng w oul d ha ve a f f e c te dth e o u tc o m e o f

th e p r o c e e d in g s . Se e id . ( r e qui r i ng pr e j udi c e t o pr e va i l on adu e p r o c e s s c h a lle n g e ) . L o o m b a ’s c la im th a t th e I Jw a s b ia s e da n du n in f o rm e dis n o t s up p o rte db yth e r e c o r d . F in a lly , th e B I A d idn o t ab u s e its d is c r e tio n in d e n y in g L o o m b a ’s m o tio n to r e m a nd the r e c or d t o r e c ons truc tam i s s i ng he ar i ng tr ans c r i ptbe c aus e L oom ba f a ile dto d e m o n s tr a te a n yp r e ju d ic e f r o m th e m is s in g tr an s c r ip t. See R a m i rezA le ja n dr e v . A s h c r o

ft , 3 1 9 F .3 d3 6 5 , 3 8 2 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 3 ) ( “U n d e rB I A p r o c e du r e , a m ot i on t o r e m a nd m us tm e e ta l l the r e qui r e m e nt s of am ot i on t o r e ope n a nd the tw o are tre at ed the sam e. ”) ; S i n gh v . I NS , 295 F . 3d 1037, 1039 ( 9th C i r . 2002) ( T he B IA ’ s d en i al o f a m o t i o n t o reo p en sh al l b e rev ersedo n l y i f i ti s “ arb i trary, i rr at i on alor contraryt o l aw . ”) . P E T IT IO N F O R R E V IE W D E N IE D i n p art; D IS M IS S E D i n p art.