alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.8
​
SECOND AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
​
THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (the “Amendment”) is made effective as of this 1st day of April 2020 (the “Amendment Effective Date”) by and between JOHN M. LIMONGELLI (“Executive”) and NEOS THERAPEUTICS, INC., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”).  Company and the Executive collectively are referred to as the “Parties.”
BACKGROUND
WHEREAS, the Executive is a party to an Employment Agreement with the Company dated as of March 18, 2019, which was subsequently amended on October 1, 2019 (collectively, the “Employment Agreement”); and
WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive desire to amend his Employment Agreement as provided herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises herein contained and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, and intending to be legally bound hereby, the Company and the Executive hereto agree as follows:
(1)Terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Employment Agreement.
​
(2)Paragraph 4(c) of the Employment Agreement hereby is amended to add the following section (v) as of the Amendment Effective Date:
​
(v)  Any stock options shall remain exercisable with respect to such vested shares for twelve (12) months following the Effective Date of the Separation Agreement and Release (but in no event beyond the expiration date of such options).
​
(3)The Parties agree to execute such further instruments and to take such further action as may be reasonably necessary to carry out the intent of this Amendment.
​
(4)This Amendment together with the Employment Agreement constitute the complete agreement of the Company and the Executive hereto with respect to the subject matters referred to herein and supersedes all prior or contemporaneous negotiations, promises, covenants, agreements or representations of every nature whatsoever with respect thereto.  This Amendment cannot be amended, modified or supplemented with respect to the Executive except by an instrument in writing executed by the Company and the Executive.
​
(5)The terms of this Amendment shall be binding upon, and shall inure to the benefit of the Executive, the Company and their respective successors and assigns.   Except as
​



​
provided in this Amendment, all other terms and conditions contained in the Employment Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.
​
(6)This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, but all of which together shall constitute but one and the same instrument.
​
[SIGNATURES ON NEXT PAGE]
​
​



​
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each Party has executed this Amendment, in the case of the Company by its duly authorized officer, as of the Amendment Effective Date.
​
	​


	​


	​



	COMPANY:
	​

	​
	​

	NEOS THERAPEUTICS, INC.
	​

	​
	​

	By:
	 /s/ Gerald McLaughlin
	​

	​
	Name: Gerald McLaughlin
	​

	​
	Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
	​

	​
	​
	​

	EXECUTIVE:
	​

	​
	​

	 /s/ John M. Limongelli
	​

	John M. Limongelli
	​

	​
	​



​
§ 1010.10 Actions that normally require an EA. ( a ) *General procedure.* If a proposal or action is not one that normally requires an EIS, and does not qualify for a categorical exclusion under § 1010.7, the Trust will require, prepare, or direct the preparation of an EA. An EA should be prepared when the Trust has insufficient information on which to determine whether a proposal may have significant impacts. An EA assists the Trust in complying with NEPA when no EIS is necessary, and it facilitates the preparation of an EIS, if one is necessary.
( b ) *Criteria.* Criteria used to determine those categories of action that normally require an EA, but not necessarily an EIS, include: ( 1 ) Potential for degradation of environmental quality;
( 2 ) Potential for cumulative adverse impact on environmental quality; and
( 3 ) Potential for adverse impact on protected resources (e.g., natural, scenic, recreational, historical, and cultural resources).
( c ) *Categories of action.* The following categories of action normally require the preparation of an EA: ( 1 ) Promulgation of regulations and requirements that are not categorically excluded;
( 2 ) Proposals submitted by project applicants to the Trust for its review, as described in § 1010.14;
( 3 ) Proposals to add or alter access between the Presidio Trust Area and surrounding neighborhoods; and
( 4 ) Contracts, work authorizations, and master agreements related to and implementing programs, policies, and proposals which are not categorically excluded and for which there is no previously prepared EA and/or EIS.
Top of page

Skip to main content

Library of Congress

              - Discover
              - Services
              - Visit
              - Education
              - Connect
              - Shop *external link*
              - Donate
              - About
              - Ask a Librarian
              - Help
              - Contact
              - Search Online Catalog
              - Copyright.gov
              - Congress.gov

Library of Congress
Digital Collections
General Maps
SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NINETY-EIGHTH CONGRESS 

FIRST SESSION { 

Convened January 3, 1983 

Adjourned November 18, 1983 

Convened January 23, 1984 

SECOND SESSION { 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Friday, March 2, 1984 

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF WILLIAM F. HILDENBRAND, 

SECRETARY OF THE SENATE 

By Gerald A. Hackett, Executive Clerk 
MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION 

Mar. 8, 1983- - Motion entered to reconsider the vote by which the resolution of 

ratification to the Montreal Protocols No. 3 and 4 (Ex. B., 95-1) was defeated--Mr. 

Baker. 
1 

TREATIES 

Calendar Treaty Subject Reported 

No. Doc. No. Bv 

1 EX. B, Montreal Aviation Protocols Nos. 3 and 4 Feb 10 83 Reported 

95-1 favorably, by Mr. Percy, 

Committee on Foreign 

Relations, with a proposed 

resolution of advice and 

consent to ratification 

with conditions (Printed 

reoort--Ex. Reot. 98-1) 

NOMINATIONS 

Calendar Message Nominee, Office, And Predecessor Reported 

No. No. Bv 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

* 445 630-13 Donna F. Tuttle, of California, to be Under Jan 30, 84 Mr. Packwood, 

Secretary of Commerce for Travel and Committee on Commerce, 

Tourism, vice Peter McCoy, resigned, to Science, and 

which position she was appointed during Transportation, without 

the last recess of the Senate. printed report. 

DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

* 468 633 William A. Wilson, of California, to be Feb 27, 84 Mr. Percy, 

Ambassador Extraordinary and Committee on Foreign 

Plenipotentiary of the United States of Relations, with printed· 

America to the Holy See. report - Ex.Rept. 98-21. 

[NEW REPORTS] 
2 

- Calendar Message Nominee, Office, And Predecessor Reported 

* 

No. No. Bv 

NATIONAL COMMISSION ON 

LIBRARIES AND INFORMATION 

SCIENCE 

490 629-10 Bessie Boehm Moore, of Arkansas, to be a Mar 1, 84 Mr. Hatch, 

Member of the National Commission on Committee on Labor and 

Libraries and Information Science for a Human Resources, without 

term expiring July 19, 1988. printed report. 

(Reapoointrnent) .. , *S1gntf1es nommee s commitment to respond to requests to appear and testify before any duly 

constituted committee of the Senate. 

-
3 

NOMINATIONS PLACED ON THE SECRETARY'S DESK IN THE FOREIGN SERVICE 

Foreign Service nominations beginning Philip Birnbaum, and ending Ronald Allen Witherell, 

which nominations were received by the Senate and appeared in the Congressional Record of January 

30. 1984.
§ 64.15 Financial reporting requirements and reimbursements. Payments to applicants will either be by reimbursement by Treasury check or advance by Treasury check. ( a ) *Reimbursement by Treasury Check.* The Outlay Report and Request for Reimbursement (OMB Circular A-102, Attachment H) is the standard form to be used for requesting reimbursement for acquisition and development. Requests for reimbursement shall be submitted by “the grantee” not more frequently than monthly. The requests for reimbursement shall be submitted by the grantee in an original and three copies to the appropriate Regional Office. The Regions will forward to the Division of Budget and Finance in Washington, DC, the original and two copies.
( b ) *Advance by Treasury Check.* The Request for Advance or Reimbursement (OMB Circular A-102, Attachment H) is the standard form for all requests for advance. An advance by Treasury check is a payment made by Treasury check to a grantee upon its request, or through the use of a predetermined payment schedule. Advances shall be limited to the minimum amounts needed and shall be timed to be in accord with only the actual cash requirements of the grantee in carrying out the purpose of the approved project. Advances shall be limited to one month's cash requirements. The request for advance shall be submitted by the grantee in an original and three copies to the appropriate Regional Office. The Region will forward to the Division of Budget and Finance in Washington, D.C., the original and two copies. Grantees must submit an “Outlay Report and Request for Reimbursement for Construction Programs” monthly showing expenditures made the previous month from the funds advanced. Upon Bureau acceptance of the expenditures involved, these reports shall be used as the basis for liquidating obligations, reducing the advance account, and making charges to the appropriate cost account.
( c ) *Report of Federal Cash Transactions (OMB Circular A-102, Attachment H).* When funds are advanced with Treasury checks, the grantee shall submit a report to monitor the cash advance. Grantees shall submit the original and three copies no later than 15 working days following the end of each quarter.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7619

RONALD CARTER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

E. C. MORRIS; L. W. HUFFMAN; D. T. MAHON;

P. L. BROWN; C. A. FOSTER; C. A. FOSTER;

D. SPRINKLE; J. BAIN,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge.

(CA-94-408-R)

Submitted: February 7, 1996 Decided: February 26, 1996

Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronald Carter, Appellant Pro Se. Martha Murphey Parrish, Assistant

Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Carter v. Morris, No. CA-94-408-R (W.D. VA. Sept. 11, 1995).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Case 16-30494 Doc 1 Filed 09/26/16 Entered 09/26/16 10:14:23 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 9
Case 16-30494 Doc 1 Filed 09/26/16 Entered 09/26/16 10:14:23 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 9
Case 16-30494 Doc 1 Filed 09/26/16 Entered 09/26/16 10:14:23 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 9
Case 16-30494 Doc 1 Filed 09/26/16 Entered 09/26/16 10:14:23 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 9
Case 16-30494 Doc 1 Filed 09/26/16 Entered 09/26/16 10:14:23 Desc Main

 Document Page 5 of 9
Case 16-30494 Doc 1 Filed 09/26/16 Entered 09/26/16 10:14:23 Desc Main

 Document Page 6 of 9
Case 16-30494 Doc 1 Filed 09/26/16 Entered 09/26/16 10:14:23 Desc Main

 Document Page 7 of 9
Case 16-30494 Doc 1 Filed 09/26/16 Entered 09/26/16 10:14:23 Desc Main

 Document Page 8 of 9
Case 16-30494 Doc 1 Filed 09/26/16 Entered 09/26/16 10:14:23 Desc Main

 Document Page 9 of 9
EXHIBIT 99.1
                                  ------------


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES - OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the quarterly report of Ceristar, (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2002, David L.Bailey, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

         1.   The quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of
              Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.   The information contained in the quarterly report fairly presents,
              in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company.


          May 20, 2003                       /s/David L. Bailey
          ------------                       --------------------
             (Date)                          David L. Bailey
                                             President and Chief Executive
                                             Officer
Cite as 2013 Ark. 343



## SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CV-13-202 KAREN COOPER AND JACK DOWELL PETITIONERS V. FAULKNER COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT RESPONDENT Opinion Delivered SEPTEMBER 20, 2013

MASTER APPOINTED.

PER CURIAM On September 5, 2013, we ordered attorneys Gary D. Jiles and Matthew K. Brown to appear before this court on September 19, 2013, to show cause as to why they should not be held in contempt for failing to comply with this court’s mandate staying all proceedings, including any attempt to collect on a garnishment, in the Faulkner County Circuit Court in the matter of City of Conway & Conway Corp. v. Cooper , No. 23CV-11-940. Both attorneys appeared on that date and entered pleas of not guilty and requested a hearing. We therefore appoint the Honorable John Plegge as a master to conduct the hearing for both attorneys. After the hearing, we direct the master to make findings of fact and to file them with this court. Once we receive the master’s findings, we will render a decision on the
matter. It is so ordered.
Date of 

report 

1969 

M::tr. 17 

i:ruatr nf tqr luitr~ itat.rs 

NINETY-FIRST CONGRESS 

FIRST SESSION {Convened January 3, 1969 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Prepared under the direction of FRANCIS R. V ALEO, Secretary of the Senate 

By GERALD A. HACKETT, Executive Clerk 

Thursday, March 20, 1969 

NOMINATION 

Calendar Message I Name of nonnnee I Office I Predecessor 

No. No. 

I 

I I 

i 

I 

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND I SPACE 

ADMINISTRATION 

I 

271 215 Thomas 0. PuinP, of Cali- Administrator of theN afornb. tiona! Aeronautics and 

Space Administration. 

98-022--69--No.20 

l! S GOVERN MEN! PIHNTING OFI !CE 1'369
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsPropellant Technologies: A Persuasive Wave of Future Propulsion BenefitsRocket propellant and propulsion technology improvements can be used to reduce the development time and operational costs of new space vehicle programs. Advanced propellant technologies can make the space vehicles safer, more operable, and higher performing. Five technology areas are described: Monopropellants, Alternative Hydrocarbons, Gelled Hydrogen, Metallized Gelled Propellants, and High Energy Density Materials. These propellants' benefits for future vehicles are outlined using mission study results and the technologies are briefly discussed.Document ID19980017543Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsPalaszewski, Bryan*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Ianovski, Leonid S.*(Central Inst. of Aviation Motors Moscow,  Russia)*Carrick, Patrick*(Phillips Lab. Edwards AFB, CA United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateDecember 1, 1997Subject CategorySpacecraft Propulsion And PowerReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:206228NASA/TM-97-206228E-10968Meeting InformationMeeting: International Symposium on Space PropulsionLocation: BeijingCountry: ChinaStart Date: August 11, 1997End Date: August 13, 1997Sponsors:China Academy of Launch Vehicle TechnologyFunding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 260-98-09Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19980017543.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

# Agency Holding the Meeting:

Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

## Sunshine Act Meetings

# Time and Date:

2 p.m., Thursday, October 26, 2006. 

# Place:

1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission Conference Room. 

# Status:

Closed.

# Matters to be Considered:

Enforcement Matters.

      ( print page 62253)    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Eileen A. Donovan, 202-418-5100.

Eileen A. Donovan,

Acting Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 06-8893 Filed 10-20-06; 2:41 pm]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
~ruutr nf tqr luitrb itutra 

NINETIETH CONGRESS 

FIRST SESSION {Co~vened January ro, rg67 

AdJourned December 15, 1967 

SECOND SESSION {Ccnvened January I5, 1968 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Prepared tmder the direction of FRANCIS R. VALEO, Secretary of the Senate 

B)' GERALD A. HACKETT, Executive Clerk 

Thursday, June 13, 1968 

UNANIMOUS-CONSENT AGREEMENT 

Ordered, That beginning at 12 noon on Thursday, June 13, 1968, debate on the resolution of ratification to 

the International Grains Arrangement of 1967 (Ex. A, 90th Oong., 2d sess.) be limited to 2 hours and 30 minut-es, 

with the time to be equally divided and controlled by the Senator from Alabama (Mr. Sparkman) and the 

Mmority L0adcr, or whoevf'r they may designate, and that the vote on the resolution of ratification occur at 

2:30p.m. 

Date or jcaJendnrll 

report No. 

~988 1 __ 1 ____ _ __ _

June 6 8 Ex. A (90th Oong., 

•rreaty No 

2d sess.) 

S:J- 022-- 68-No. 165 

TREATY 

Subject 

The InternaLional Grains Arrangement of 

1967. 

(June 12, 1988) 

Action o! committee 

Reported favorably by 

:Mr. Mansfield (for 

Senator Fulbright), 

from the Committee 

on Foreign Relations, 

with a printed report 

(see Ex. Rept. No.6, 

90th Cong., 2d sess.) 

and minor1ty ~ iews 

(see Ex. Rept. No. 6, 

pt 2, 90th Cong., 2d 

sess.). 
2 

NOMINATIONS -~----~----~------------------.------------------- -----------

Date of Calendar Message Name of nommee Office 

report No No Preaecessor 

-----------------1---------------------

:f!Jf!B 

Jnne 12 3:l8 130 

12 32\J 114 

12 3:~o 129 

DEPARTMENT OF 

HEALTH, EDUCATION, 

AND WELFARE 

Alice :\I. Hivlin, of the 

D1strict of Columbia. 

Pardo Frederick DelliQnadri, of Hawaii. 

COUNCIL OF 

ECONOMIC ADVISERS 

Wn.rren L. Smith, of Mirhigan. 

An Assistant Secn•tn.ry of William Gorh;un. 

Health, Education, and 

Welfare. 

Chief of the Children's 

Bureau, Depn.rtment of 

Health, Education, and 

Welfare. 

A member of the Council of J n.mes S. Ducsenber ry. Economic Adviser<>. 

-----------~----~----------------~------------------~ -------------

U 5 GOVERNMENT PRINTI NG OFFICE 1918
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned hereby certify that to the best of our knowledge:

1. this annual report on Form 20-F of CSR plc fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. the information contained in this annual
report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of CSR plc.

Date: 14 March, 2012



/s/ Joep van BeurdenName:

Joep van BeurdenTitle:

Chief Executive Officer/s/ Will GardinerName:

Will GardinerTitle:

Chief Financial Officer




E-3
# EUR-Lex - 12008E030 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008E030

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - PART THREE: UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS - TITLE II: FREE MOVEMENT OF GOODS - Chapter 1: The customs union - Article 30 (ex Article 25 TEC) **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0060 - 0060 *

Article 30

(ex Article 25 TEC)

Customs duties on imports and exports and charges having equivalent effect shall be prohibited between Member States. This prohibition shall also apply to customs duties of a fiscal nature.

--------------------------------------------------
#### Mary A. Halloran, Respondent, *v.*Isidor Straus et al., Appellants.

(Argued April 9, 1907;

decided April 23, 1907.)

*Halloran*v. *Straus,*112 App. Div. 899, affirmed.

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered March 15, 1906, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been received .through defendants’ negligence.

*FImond F. Wise*for appellants.

*Albert SticJcney, Jr.,*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., O’Brien, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Hiscook and Chase, JJ.