alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
P.1 

OAR Box 1834 

Prepped by Keeia Richards 

Document Number: 

29) IV-E-02 

Docket Number: 

A-90-07 

Printed 11/10/2008 2:14:34 PM Sheet 29 of 61 
n * v. 

P,2 

KW>J UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

ANN ARBOR. MICHIGAN 48105 

OFFICE OF 

AIR AND RADIATION JUN 1 9 1932 

MEMORANDUM 

SUBJECT: Phone Conversation With Representative of NRDC Regarding 

the Fuels and Fuel Additives Program NPRM

 e<?arain<? 

FROM: 

TO: 

THRU: 

Judith Gray, Project Manager 

Special Regulatory Projects B 

Docket A-90-07 

bpecia l Regulatory Projects Branch ' 

This memorandum is t o document- a +•«_! __Y-.K^-,A ~ . . 

on June 10, 1992 with Mr n^f H n • P conversatio n held 

S^dTh^/aT i nft^aV^ ? repr e_Lbtatlvfe

U

s

elS '„ a

e

n d a^_ 

which ne is pr S " t-^lT.f C^ ^

 th S

 «***- ! ~ s 

In broad outline , th e NRDC 

proqram pronoqal t-r* K_> ^T-, +-K~ • _._ ~f^—"—*w apparentl*4yr ^waxuer g tn e _/_ 

 considers th e F/FA 

s 

D 

2) 

!^i h !

alt h effect s ^dpoints examined in Tier 2 should include immunology testing. should 

If all Tier 3 decisions are left to EPA's discret-inn *« 

csa^-asar __a*jsr srsi?H i 

results i , rtr% POS3lbXl outcomes based on Tie r 1 _ 2 

3? TT!V \

 3 re< ^lred

- 2) Tie r 3 not required , and 

this plan req ?_!! m e ?

t %d e P ? n d o n EPA ' * :-« . Under 

obvious and straightforwar d

 1C h W6r e leS S 
P.3 

3) Examination of emission effects should not necessarily be 

limited to inhalation, since the emissions can also have 

effects mediated through water and soil. 

4) The time frame for the literature search should not be 

limited to 15 years, since positive test results could 

have been obtained many years ago and the test never 

repeated in more recent years. 

During our conversation, I mentioned to Mr. Driesen the 

concerns voiced at the May 28th public hearing about the lack of 

available commercial lab facilities and the associated problems in 

meeting the statutory three-year time limit for compliance. Mr. 

Driesen said that industry always find some reason why regulatory 

requirements "can't be done". In this case, he noted that the law 

we are attempting to implement has been on the books for many years 

and there is no reason why industry should not be working right now 

to establish the facilities they will need for timely compliance. 

I pointed out that, even if his view on this point is correct for 

affected large businesses and their trade organizations, small 

businesses would generally not have the resources to set up their 

own labs. Mr. Driesen had no immediate solution for small 

businesses, but also emphasized that businesses of all sizes are 

accountable for the health effects of the products they sell.
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 20 (Tuesday, January 31, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 5049]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-874]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Trinity County Resource Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Trinity County Resource Advisory Committee (RAC) will meet 
at the Trinity County Office of Education in Weaverville, California, 
March 6, 2006. The purpose of this meeting is to discuss proposed 
projects under Title II of the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-
Determination Act of 2000.

DATES: March 6, 2006.

ADDRESSES: Trinity County Office of Education, 201 Memorial Drive, 
Weaverville, California 96093.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael R. Odle, Public Affairs 
Officer and RAC Coordinator.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting is open to the public. Public 
input sessions will be provided and individuals will have the 
opportunity to address the Trinity County Resource Advisory Committee.

    Dated: January 13, 2006.
J. Sharon Heywood,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 06-874 Filed 1-30-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
§ 64.8 Project selection criteria. Those projects which best meet the following criteria will be selected to receive assistance: ( a ) Projects which have cleared abandonment procedures and for which sufficient control and tenure of land can be assured, in order that the project can be accomplished shortly after project approval.
( b ) Projects which are located or originate in Standard Metropolitan Statistical Areas.
( c ) The degree to which the project results in a facility which demonstrates maximum beneficial public use of the property acquired. (For example, the diversity of recreation/conservation opportunities provided.)
( d ) The ease of accessibility to large numbers of potential users.
( e ) The effectiveness of the project in enhancing existing Federal, State, or local recreation/conservation resources. (For example, the ability of the project to tie together existing recreation/conservation resources.)
( f ) Whether use of the right-of-way for recreation/conservation purposes has been identified in existing State, Federal, or local plans.
( g ) The degree to which the project advances new ideas in recreation/conservation use and promotes nonmotorized forms of transportation such as commuting by bicycle.
( h ) The recreation/conservation potential of the environment traversed by the right-of-way.
( i ) The energy conservation potential of using the right-of-way for recreation and/or commuting.
( j ) The urgency of the acquisition as reflected by the plans of the owner of record to sell the property to persons other than the project sponsor.
( k ) The degree to which Federal, State or local land use controls will protect the recreation and conservation values of the right-of-way from encroachment by conflicting uses of surrounding land.
( l ) State and local projects involving the development of abandoned railroad rights-of-way which do not include the acquisition of the rights-of-way will be given lower funding priority than projects involving both acquisition and development.
117 STAT. 1354 PUBLIC LAW 108–127—NOV. 17, 2003

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 3288 (S. 1547):

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 149 (2003):

Oct. 20, considered and passed House.

Oct. 31, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 108–127

108th Congress

An Act

To amend title XXI of the Social Security Act to make technical corrections with

respect to the definition of qualifying State.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS RELATING TO THE DEFINITION

OF QUALIFYING STATE UNDER TITLE XXI OF THE SOCIAL

SECURITY ACT.

Effective as if included in the enactment of Public Law 108–

74, section 2105(g)(2) of the Social Security Act, as added by section

1(b) of such Act, is amended—

(1) by striking ‘‘185’’ the first place it appears and inserting

‘‘184’’;

(2) by inserting ‘‘August 1, 1994, or’’ before ‘‘July 1, 1995’’;

and

(3) by inserting before the period at the end the following:

‘‘, or, in the case of a State that had a statewide waiver

in effect under section 1115 with respect to title XIX that

was first implemented on October 1, 1993, had an income

eligibility standard under such waiver for children that was

at least 185 percent of the poverty line and on and after

July 1, 1998, has an income eligibility standard for children

under section 1902(a)(10)(A) or a statewide waiver in effect

under section 1115 with respect to title XIX that is at least

185 percent of the poverty line’’.

Approved November 17, 2003.

Ante, p. 895.

Nov. 17, 2003

[H.R. 3288]
§ 86.70 What standards must I follow when constructing a BIG-funded facility? ( a ) You must design and build a BIG-funded facility so that each structure meets Federal, State, and local standards.
( b ) A Region or a State may require you to have plans reviewed by a subject-matter expert if there are questions as to the safety, structural stability, durability, or other construction concerns for projects that will cost more than $100,000.
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 196 (Wednesday, October 11, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 59839]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-8576]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Proposal Review Panel for Materials Research; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463 as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Proposal Review Panel for Materials Research (1203).
    Dates & Times: November 13, 2006; 7:30 a.m.-9 p.m.; November 14, 
2006; 7:45 a.m.-3:30 p.m.
    Place: University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg, MS
    Type of Meeting: Part-open.
    Contact Person: Dr. Thomas Rieker, Program Director, Materials 
Research Science and Engineering Centers Programs, Division of 
Materials Research, Room 1065, National Science Foundation, 4201 
Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230, Telephone (703) 292-4914.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning further support of the Materials Research Science and 
Engineering Center.

Agenda

Monday, November 13, 2006

7:45 a.m.-8:45 a.m.
    Closed--Executive session.
8:45 a.m.-4:30 p.m.
    Open--Review of the Materials Research Science and Engineering 
Center at the University of Southern Mississippi.
4:30 p.m.-5:45 p.m.
    Closed--Executive session.
7 p.m.-9 p.m.
    Open--Dinner.

Tuesday, November 14, 2006

8 a.m.-9 a.m.
    Closed--Executive session.
9 a.m.-10 a.m.
    Open--Review of the Materials Research Science and Engineering 
Center at the University of Southern Mississippi.
10 a.m.-3:30 p.m.
    Closed--Executive Session, Draft and Review Report.

    Reason for Closing:The work being reviewed may include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries and personal 
information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. 
These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: October 4, 2006.
Susanne Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 06-8576 Filed 10-10-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
# EUR-Lex - 12008M/PRO/32 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008M/PRO/32

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on European Union - PROTOCOLS - Protocol (No 32) on the acquisition of property in Denmark **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0318 - 0318 *

PROTOCOL (No 32)

ON THE ACQUISITION OF PROPERTY IN DENMARK

THE HIGH CONTRACTING PARTIES,

DESIRING to settle certain particular problems relating to Denmark,

HAVE AGREED UPON the following provisions, which shall be annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union:

Notwithstanding the provisions of the Treaties, Denmark may maintain the existing legislation on the acquisition of second homes.

--------------------------------------------------
§ 242.12 Local advisory committees. ( a ) The Board shall establish such local Federal Advisory Committees within each region as necessary at such time that it is determined, after notice and hearing and consultation with the State, that the existing State fish and game advisory committees do not adequately provide advice to, and assist, the particular Regional Council in carrying out its function as set forth in § 242.11.
( b ) Local Federal Advisory Committees, if established by the Board, shall operate in conformance with the provisions of the FACA, and comply with rules of operation established by the Board.
#### Adams v. Lindell, *Appellant.*

L De Facto Officer: contract : election. The rule as to the validation of the acts of *de facto*officers is one of policy, and may be applied, not only where there is no *de jure*officer, but where the legal office itself no longer exists. Where the person claiming to hold the office is not a mere usurper, but, owing to a mistake of fact, held under a perfect color of right, which justified men in concluding that he was a legal officer holding a legal office, and where the fact that the office was abolished remained, for a long time, unknown, owing to a false announcement of election returns, his acts as such officer, done after the abolition of the office and before the fact was known, may be validated for the purpose of supporting contracts made with him where money and labor have been expended on the faith of his authority to act and contract as such officer.

2. St. Louis Scheme and Charter: special tax bills. A special tax bill issued under an ordinance approved by the acting mayor and city council of St. Louis, on December 29th, 1876, after the city council was abolished and the new charter adopted, but before the fact was known, is not necessarily void.

8. Estates in Land: condition subsequent. Land was conveyed to a municipal corporation, to be used as a market place, to be held in fee so long as so used, to revert to the donor when it ceased to be so used, and the donee, upon failure to so use it, to reconvey to the donor. *Held,,*that this was not a determinable fee, but an estate held upon condition subsequent; and that the condition, though broken, did not defeat the estate before entry by the donor.

4. Constitutional Law: special assessments fob municipal improvements. The provisions in the constitution of 1875, relating to the uniformity and equality of taxation, and the taking of private property for public use, were not intended to apply to, and do not effect any change in, the law as to the right of municipal corporations to make special assessments for local improvements.*

*Appeal from St. Louis Court of Appeals.*

Amtrmed.

G. *Pollard*for appellant.

*J. H. Wieting*and I. *C. Terry*for respondent. .

*

 These syllabi are taken from 5 Mo. App. 197.

*199Napton, J.

This case involves three points, all of which are elaborately discussed and decided by the court of appeals, and the opinion of that court reported in 5th vol. of Mo. App. Rep. 197. One of the points was also examined and decided in the case of the *State to the use of Beach v. Sutton,*reported in vol. 3 of Mo. App. Rep. 388. As we concur with that court, not only in the result, but in the decision on each point involved in the case, it seems unnecessary to do more than to refer to these cases. The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed.

All the judges concur.
|                                           | SEARCHLIGHT MINERALS      CORP. |                        |
|------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------|-----------------------------|
|                                           |                            |                        |   |
| Date:    July      6, 2009 | By:                             | /s/ IAN      R. MCNEIL |   |
|                                           |                            | Ian      R. McNeil          |   |
|                                           |                            | Chief Executive Officer     |   |
|                                           |                            |                        |   |

| Date:    July      6, 2009 | By:    | /s/ MELVIN      L. WILLIAMS |   |
|------------------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------|--------|
|                                           |   | Melvin L.      Williams          |   |
|                                           |   | Chief Financial Officer          |   |
|                                           |   |                             |   |

----
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 31.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Sean McDonnell, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of Ace Marketing &
Promotions, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer (if any) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.


DATE: AUGUST 15, 2005               /S/ SEAN MCDONNELL
                                    -------------------------
                                    SEAN MCDONNELL, CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
~tuntt nf tqt Jtuitt~ itatts 

NINETIETH CONGRESS 

FIRST SESSION {Co~vened January 10, 1967 

Adjourned December 15, 196i 

SECOND SESSION {Convened January 15, 1968 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Pte pared under the direction of FRANCIS R. V ALEO, Secretary of the Senate 

By GERALD A. HACKETT, Executive Clerk 

Saturday, July 27, 1968 

NOMINATIONS ---- --~-----,----~-------------------,----------------------------------

Date of Calendar Message 

report No. No. 

Name ofnommee Office Predecessor 

U.S. MARINE CORPS 

1968 

July 25 850 247 Lt. Col. Haywood n. ColoneL ____ __ ________ __ _ 

26 851 

Smith, U.S. lVhrine 

Corps, for tempomrr 

appointment i.o the grade 

indicated, to hold such 

grade while serving as 

Armed Forces Aide to 

the President. 

FEDERAL DEPOSIT 

INSURANCE 

CORPORATION 

257 Irvine H. Spra;;at:, of Cali- A member of the Board of William i'•. ::-;herri!l, 

fornia. Directors of the £ederal resigned. 

Deposit In~urance Corporation for a term of 

6 years. 

NOMINATIONS PLACED ON THE SECRETARY'S DESK 

In the Army 

The nominations beginning William C. Hunt, to be 2d lieutenant, and ending Robert L. Schmidt, to be 

2d lieutenant, which nominations were received by the Senate and appeared in the Congressional Record on 

July 17, 1968. 

98-022--68--No. 181 

U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1968
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 31.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Sean McDonnell, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of Ace Marketing &
Promotions, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer (if any) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

         a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

         b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

         a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

         b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.

DATE: August 22, 2006                    /S/ SEAN MCDONNELL
                                         ------------------
                                         SEAN MCDONNELL, CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
§ 1192.87 Public information system. ( a ) Each vehicle shall be equipped with an interior public address system permitting transportation system personnel, or recorded or digitized human speech messages, to announce stations and provide other passenger information. Alternative systems or devices which provide equivalent access are also permitted.
( b ) [Reserved]
TS-ASLT40/50

Attachment #5

Pt. 2, Sec. A, 2

Worker/Occupational Exposure Informatio n on the New Chemical Substance at

Industrial Sites Controlled by the Submitter – Manufacture and Processing