Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 223 / Tuesday, November 19, 2013 / Rules and Regulations 69299 

enforce its requirements. (See section 

307(b)(2).) 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Carbon monoxide, 

Incorporation by reference, 

Intergovernmental relations, Lead, 

Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate 

matter, Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile 

organic compounds. 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq 

Dated: April 26, 2013. 

Howard M. Cantor, 

Acting Regional Administrator, Region 8. 

40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows: 

PART 52—APPROVAL AND 

PROMULGATION OF 

IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 

■ 1. The authority citation for Part 52 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Subpart BB—Montana 

■ 2. Section 52.1370 is amended by 

adding paragraph (c)(73) to read as 

follows: 

§ 52.1370 Identification of plan. 

* * * * * 

(c) * * * 

(73) On September 23, 2011, the State 

of Montana submitted new rules to the 

Administrative Rules of Montana 

(ARM). The submittal included new 

rules to ARM Chapter 17. The 

incorporation by reference in 

paragraphs (i)(A) and (i)(B) reflect the 

new rules. 

(i) Incorporation by reference. 

(A) Administrative Rules of Montana: 

17.8.1601, Definitions; 17.8.1602, 

Applicability and Coordination with 

Montana Air Quality Permit Rules; 

17.8.1603, Emission Control 

Requirements; 17.8.1604, Inspection 

and Repair Requirements; 17.8.1605, 

Recordkeeping Requirements; 

17.8.1606, Delayed Effective Date; 

effective January 1, 2006. 

(B) Administrative Rules of Montana: 

17.8.1701, Definitions; 17.8.1702, 

Applicability; 17.8.1703, Registration 

Process and Information; 17.8.1704, 

Registration Fee; 17.8.1705, Operating 

Requirements: Facility-wide; 17.8.1710, 

Oil or Gas Well Facilities General 

Requirements; 17.8.1711, Oil or Gas 

Well Facilities Emission Control 

Requirements; 17.8.1712, Oil or Gas 

Well Facilities Inspection and Repair 

Requirements; 17.8.1713, Oil or Gas 

Well Facilities Recordkeeping and 

Reporting Requirements; effective April 

7, 2006. 

[FR Doc. 2013–27555 Filed 11–18–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R05–OAR–2011–0672; FRL–9902–03– 

Region 5] 

Approval and Promulgation of Air 

Quality Implementation Plans; Ohio; 

Ohio SO2 Air Quality Rule Revisions 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Direct final rule. 

SUMMARY: On June 24, 2011, Ohio 

Environmental Protection Agency (Ohio 

EPA) submitted for Clean Air Act (CAA) 

State Implementation Plan (SIP) 

approval, revisions to Ohio 

Administrative Code (OAC) rules: 3745– 

18–01, 3745–18–03 to 3745–18–52, 

3745–18–54 to 3745–18–77, 3745–18– 

79, 3745–18–81 to 3745–18–89, and 

3745–18–91 to 3745–18–94. The rule 

revisions primarily update facility 

information and remove SO2

requirements for shutdown facilities 

throughout the SIP. EPA believes that 

the revisions improve the clarity of the 

rule without affecting the stringency 

and therefore is approving all of the 

submitted revisions except for specific 

paragraphs in OAC 3745–18–04. 

DATES: This rule is effective January 21, 

2014, unless EPA receives adverse 

comments by December 19, 2013. If 

adverse comments are received, EPA 

will publish a timely withdrawal of the 

direct final rule in the Federal Register 

informing the public that the rule will 

not take effect. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R05– 

OAR–2011–0672, by one of the 

following methods: 

1. www.regulations.gov: Follow the 

on-line instructions for submitting 

comments. 

2. Email: aburano.douglas@epa.gov. 

3. Fax: (312) 408–2279. 

4. Mail: Douglas Aburano, Chief, 

Attainment Planning and Maintenance 

Section, Air Programs Branch (AR–18J), 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 

77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, 

Illinois 60604. 

5. Hand Delivery: Douglas Aburano, 

Chief, Attainment Planning and 

Maintenance Section, Air Programs 

Branch (AR–18J), U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson 

Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. 

Such deliveries are only accepted 

during the Regional Office normal hours 

of operation, and special arrangements 

should be made for deliveries of boxed 

information. The Regional Office official 

hours of business are Monday through 

Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding 

Federal holidays. 

Instructions: Direct your comments to 

Docket ID No. EPA–R05–OAR–2011– 

0672. EPA’s policy is that all comments 

received will be included in the public 

docket without change and may be 

made available online at 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information provided, unless 

the comment includes information 

claimed to be Confidential Business 

Information (CBI) or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Do not submit information that you 

consider to be CBI or otherwise 

protected through www.regulations.gov 

or email. The www.regulations.gov Web 

site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, 

which means EPA will not know your 

identity or contact information unless 

you provide it in the body of your 

comment. If you send an email 

comment directly to EPA without going 

through www.regulations.gov your email 

address will be automatically captured 

and included as part of the comment 

that is placed in the public docket and 

made available on the Internet. If you 

submit an electronic comment, EPA 

recommends that you include your 

name and other contact information in 

the body of your comment and with any 

disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA 

cannot read your comment due to 

technical difficulties and cannot contact 

you for clarification, EPA may not be 

able to consider your comment. 

Electronic files should avoid the use of 

special characters, any form of 

encryption, and be free of any defects or 

viruses. 

Docket: All documents in the docket 

are listed in the www.regulations.gov 

index. Although listed in the index, 

some information is not publicly 

available, e.g., CBI or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Certain other material, such as 

copyrighted material, will be publicly 

available only in hard copy. Publicly 

available docket materials are available 

either electronically in 

www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at 

the Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 5, Air and Radiation Division, 77 

West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, 

Illinois 60604. This facility is open from 

8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through 

Friday, excluding Federal holidays. We 

recommend that you telephone Sarah 

Arra, Environmental Scientist, at (312) 


TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
69300 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 223 / Tuesday, November 19, 2013 / Rules and Regulations 

886–9401 before visiting the Region 5 

office. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Sarah Arra, Environmental Scientist, 

Attainment Planning and Maintenance 

Section, Air Programs Branch (AR–18J), 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, 

Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886–9401, 

Arra.Sarah@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Throughout this document whenever 

‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean 

EPA. This supplementary information 

section is arranged as follows: 

I. Background 

II. Review of Ohio’s Submittal 

III. What action is EPA taking? 

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews 

I. Background 

Ohio law requires a five year review 

of all regulations. Ohio conducted a 

review on OAC 3745–18 and made 

revisions throughout the rules. The rule 

revisions are primarily updating facility 

information and removing requirements 

that apply to shutdown facilities. Ohio 

EPA submitted the rule revisions to EPA 

on June 24, 2011. EPA’s most recent 

approval for revisions to OAC 3745–18 

was published in the Federal Register 

on March 21, 2008 at 73 FR 15083. For 

a full history of the federally approved 

revisions to OAC 3745–18, see the 

Background section of rulemaking 

published in the Federal Register on 

May 1, 2007 at 72 FR 23783. 

II. Review of Ohio’s Submittal 

During Ohio’s five year review, Ohio 

made revisions to rules: 3745–18–01, 

3745–18–03 to 3745–18–52, 3745–18–54 

to 3745–18–77, 3745–18–79, 3745–18– 

81 to 3745–18–89, and 3745–18–91 to 

3745–18–94. 

Numerous revisions to OAC 3745–18 

were updates of existing facility 

information. Several facilities had 

changes in premise numbers. Several 

other facilities were updated with name 

changes. An emissions limit was 

updated for the Sunoco, Inc., Toledo 

Refinery. This limit is consistent with 

EPA’s consent order 05CV2866. The 

updates to these facilities allow for 

consistent recordkeeping and easier 

compliance tracking. 

Most of the substantial rule revisions 

were the removal of requirements for 

shutdown facilities from the SIP. Ohio’s 

criteria for removing requirements for a 

facility from the SIP is that the facility 

has been permanently and enforceablely 

shutdown for at least five years. EPA 

and Ohio EPA are confident that all the 

facilities for which requirements are 

being removed from the SIP are 

permanently and enforceablely shut 

down. When confirming a shutdown 

facility, EPA relies on the State’s 

database. EPA confirmed that all of the 

shutdown facilities are in Ohio EPA’s 

database. Table 1 in EPA’s September 

2013 Technical Support Document 

(TSD), available in the docket for this 

rulemaking, shows the facilities that 

have been shut down with their 

shutdown dates. For the last third of 

Table 1, EPA was not able to confirm a 

shutdown date for the facilities. Ohio 

EPA confirmed that these facilities were 

shut down before the existence of the 

database and supplied information on 

the shutdown of these facilities in the 

last column of Table 1. 

The last eight facilities in Table 1 of 

the TSD are still operating. However, 

Ohio EPA and EPA agree that it is 

appropriate to remove the SO2

requirements from the SIP because all 

SO2 applicable emissions units are shut 

down and would require a new permit 

for restart. 

Table 2 in the TSD is a list of facilities 

that are still operating emission units 

applicable to the SIP, but have units that 

have shut down. Therefore, for clarity of 

the rule, it is appropriate to remove the 

SO2 requirements for the shutdown 

units from the SIP. 

For the few cases where the facility 

still operates, but the emissions units 

are shut down, the permits have been 

revoked and new permits would need to 

be issued if the units ever restarted. EPA 

is confident that all facilities where SO2

requirements have been removed from 

the SIP are permanently and 

enforceablely shutdown. Therefore, 

removing SO2 requirements for these 

facilities from OAC 3745–18 does not 

have any negative impact on the 

environment, but instead, improves the 

clarity of the rules. 

EPA is not taking action on selected 

paragraphs in OAC 3745–18–04. 

Paragraph OAC 37–18–04(D)(9), 

contains a typographical error that 

changes the testing method required in 

the paragraph. EPA is not taking action 

on this paragraph, so the version that 

was state effective on March 21, 2000 

will remain in effect for the Federally 

approved SIP. Ohio sent an email on 

September 20, 2013 acknowledging this 

error. EPA is also not taking action on 

paragraphs OAC 37–18–04(D)(2), (D)(3), 

(D)(5), (D)(6), (E)(2), (E)(3), and (E)(4). 

These paragraphs have not been 

previously approved by EPA and are 

outside the cleanup intent of these SIP 

revisions. 

III. What action is EPA taking? 

EPA is approving OAC 3745–18–01, 

3745–18–03, 3745–18–05 to 3745–18– 

52, 3745–18–54 to 3745–18–77, 3745– 

18–79, 3745–18–81 to 3745–18–89, 

3745–18–91 to 3745–18–94, and parts of 

3745–18–04. The revisions mainly 

remove the SO2 requirements for 

permanently shutdown facilities from 

the SIP. EPA believes the revisions 

improve the clarity of the rule without 

affecting the stringency of the SIP. EPA 

is not taking action on OAC 3745–18– 

04(D)(2)to(3), (D)(5)to(6), (D)(9), and 

(E)(2)to(4). 

We are publishing this action without 

prior proposal because we view this as 

a noncontroversial amendment and 

anticipate no adverse comments. 

However, in the proposed rules section 

of this Federal Register publication, we 

are publishing a separate document that 

will serve as the proposal to approve the 

state plan if relevant adverse written 

comments are filed. This rule will be 

effective January 21, 2014 without 

further notice unless we receive relevant 

adverse written comments by December 

19, 2013. If we receive such comments, 

we will withdraw this action before the 

effective date by publishing a 

subsequent document that will 

withdraw the final action. All public 

comments received will then be 

addressed in a subsequent final rule 

based on the proposed action. EPA will 

not institute a second comment period. 

Any parties interested in commenting 

on this action should do so at this time. 

Please note that if EPA receives adverse 

comment on an amendment, paragraph, 

or section of this rule and if that 

provision may be severed from the 

remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt 

as final those provisions of the rule that 

are not the subject of an adverse 

comment. If we do not receive any 

comments, this action will be effective 

January 21, 2014. 

IV. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

Under the CAA, the Administrator is 

required to approve a SIP submission 

that complies with the provisions of the 

CCAA and applicable Federal 

regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 

52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP 

submissions, EPA’s role is to approve 

state choices, provided that they meet 

the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, 

this action merely approves state law as 

meeting Federal requirements and does 

not impose additional requirements 

beyond those imposed by state law. For 

that reason, this action: 

• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ subject to review by the Office 

of Management and Budget under 

Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993); 


TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 223 / Tuesday, November 19, 2013 / Rules and Regulations 69301 

• Does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• Is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act 

(5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• Does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• Does not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• Is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• Is not subject to requirements of 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the CAA; and 

• Does not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

In addition, this rule does not have 

tribal implications as specified by 

Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, 

November 9, 2000), because the SIP is 

not approved to apply in Indian country 

located in the state, and EPA notes that 

it will not impose substantial direct 

costs on tribal governments or preempt 

tribal law. 

The Congressional Review Act, 5 

U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides 

that before a rule may take effect, the 

agency promulgating the rule must 

submit a rule report, which includes a 

copy of the rule, to each House of the 

Congress and to the Comptroller General 

of the United States. EPA will submit a 

report containing this action and other 

required information to the U.S. Senate, 

the U.S. House of Representatives, and 

the Comptroller General of the United 

States prior to publication of the rule in 

the Federal Register. A major rule 

cannot take effect until 60 days after it 

is published in the Federal Register. 

This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as 

defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). 

Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, 

petitions for judicial review of this 

action must be filed in the United States 

Court of Appeals for the appropriate 

circuit by January 21, 2014. Filing a 

petition for reconsideration by the 

Administrator of this final rule does not 

affect the finality of this action for the 

purposes of judicial review nor does it 

extend the time within which a petition 

for judicial review may be filed, and 

shall not postpone the effectiveness of 

such rule or action. Parties with 

objections to this direct final rule are 

encouraged to file a comment in 

response to the parallel notice of 

proposed rulemaking for this action 

published in the proposed rules section 

of today’s Federal Register, rather than 

file an immediate petition for judicial 

review of this direct final rule, so that 

EPA can withdraw this direct final rule 

and address the comment in the 

proposed rulemaking. This action may 

not be challenged later in proceedings to 

enforce its requirements. (See section 

307(b)(2).) 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Incorporation by 

reference, Intergovernmental relations, 

Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Sulfur oxides. 

Dated: September 26, 2013. 

Susan Hedman, 

Regional Administrator, Region 5. 

40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows: 

PART 52—APPROVAL AND 

PROMULGATION OF 

IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

■ 2. Section 52.1870 is amended by 

adding paragraph (c)(160) to read as 

follows: 

§ 52.1870 Identification of plan. 

* * * * * 

(c) * * * 

(160) On June 24, 2011, Ohio 

submitted numerous revisions to their 

SO2 rules in Ohio Administrative Code 

Chapter 3745–18. These revisions 

mainly update facility information and 

remove shutdown facilities from the 

rule. 

(i) Incorporation by reference. 

(A) Ohio Administrative Code Rules 

3745–18–03 ‘‘Attainment dates and 

compliance time schedules.’’, 3745–18– 

04 ‘‘Measurement methods and 

procedures.’’ except (D)(2), (D)(3), 

(D)(5), (D)(6), (D)(9), (E)(2), (E)(3), and 

(E)(4), 3745–18–05 ‘‘Ambient and 

meteorological monitoring 

requirements.’’, 3745–18–06 ‘‘General 

emission limit provisions.’’, 3745–18–07 

‘‘Adams County emission limits.’’, 

3745–18–08 ‘‘Allen County emissions 

limits.’’, 3745–18–09 ‘‘Ashland County 

emission limits.’’, 3745–18–10 

‘‘Ashtabula County emissions limits.’’, 

3745–18–11 ‘‘Athens County emission 

limits.’’, 3745–18–12 ‘‘Auglaize County 

emission limits.’’, 3745–18–13 

‘‘Belmont County emission limits.’’, 

3745–18–14 ‘‘Brown County emission 

limits.’’, 3745–18–15 ‘‘Butler County 

emission limits.’’, 3745–18–16 ‘‘Carroll 

County emission limits.’’, 3745–18–17 

‘‘Champaign County emission limits.’’, 

3745–18–18 ‘‘Clark County emission 

limits.’’, 3745–18–19 ‘‘Clermont County 

emission limits.’’, 3745–18–20 ‘‘Clinton 

County emission limits.’’, 3745–18–21 

‘‘Columbiana County emission limits.’’, 

3745–18–22 ‘‘Coshocton County 

emission limits.’’, 3745–18–23 

‘‘Crawford County emission limits.’’, 

3745–18–24 ‘‘Cuyahoga County 

emission limits.’’, 3745–18–25 ‘‘Darke 

County emission limits.’’, 3745–18–26 

‘‘Defiance County emission limits.’’, 

3745–18–27 ‘‘Delaware County emission 

limits.’’, 3745–18–28 ‘‘Erie County 

emission limits.’’, 3745–18–29 

‘‘Fairfield County emission limits.’’, 

3745–18–30 ‘‘Fayette County emission 

limits.’’, 3745–18–31 ‘‘Franklin County 

emission limits.’’, 3745–18–32 ‘‘Fulton 

County emission limits.’’, 3745–18–33 

‘‘Gallia County emission limits.’’, 3745– 

18–34 ‘‘Geauga County emission 

limits.’’, 3745–18–35 ‘‘Greene County 

emission limits.’’, 3745–18–36 

‘‘Guernsey County emission limits.’’, 

3745–18–37 ‘‘Hamilton County 

emission limits.’’, 3745–18–38 

‘‘Hancock County emission limits.’’, 

3745–18–39 ‘‘Hardin County emission 

limits.’’, 3745–18–40 ‘‘Harrison County 

emission limits.’’, 3745–18–41 ‘‘Henry 

County emission limits.’’, 3745–18–42 

‘‘Highland County emission limits.’’, 

3745–18–43 ‘‘Hocking County emission 

limits.’’, 3745–18–44 ‘‘Holmes County 

emission limits.’’, 3745–18–45 ‘‘Huron 

County emission limits.’’, 3745–18–46 

‘‘Jackson County emission limits.’’, 

3745–18–47 ‘‘Jefferson County emission 

limits.’’, 3745–18–48 ‘‘Knox County 

emission limits.’’, 3745–18–49 ‘‘Lake 

County emission limits.’’, 3745–18–50 

‘‘Lawrence County emission limits.’’, 

3745–18–51 ‘‘Licking County emission 

limits.’’, 3745–18–52 ‘‘Logan County 

emission limits.’’, 3745–18–55 

‘‘Madison County emission limits.’’, 

3745–18–56 ‘‘Mahoning County 

emission limits.’’, 3745–18–57 ‘‘Marion 

County emission limits.’’, 3745–18–58 

‘‘Medina County emission limits.’’, 

3745–18–59 ‘‘Meigs County emission 

limits.’’, 3745–18–60 ‘‘Mercer County 


TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
69302 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 223 / Tuesday, November 19, 2013 / Rules and Regulations 

emission limits.’’, 3745–18–61 ‘‘Miami 

County emission limits.’’, 3745–18–62 

‘‘Monroe County emission limits.’’, 

3745–18–63 ‘‘Montgomery County 

emission limits.’’, 3745–18–64 ‘‘Morgan 

County emission limits.’’, 3745–18–65 

‘‘Morrow County emission limits.’’, 

3745–18–66 ‘‘Muskingum County 

emission limits.’’, 3745–18–67 ‘‘Noble 

County emission limits.’’, 3745–18–68 

‘‘Ottawa County emission limits.’’, 

3745–18–69 ‘‘Paulding County emission 

limits.’’, 3745–18–70 ‘‘Perry County 

emission limits.’’, 3745–18–71 

‘‘Pickaway County emission limits.’’, 

3745–18–72 ‘‘Pike County emission 

limits.’’, 3745–18–73 ‘‘Portage County 

emission limits.’’, 3745–18–74 ‘‘Preble 

County emission limits.’’, 3745–18–75 

‘‘Putnam County emission limits.’’, 

3745–18–76 ‘‘Richland County emission 

limits.’’, 3745–18–77 ‘‘Ross County 

emission limits.’’, 3745–18–79 ‘‘Scioto 

County emission limits.’’, 3745–18–81 

‘‘Shelby County emission limits.’’, 

3745–18–83 ‘‘Summit County emission 

limits.’’, 3745–18–84 ‘‘Trumbull County 

emission limits.’’, 3745–18–85 

‘‘Tuscarawas County emission limits.’’, 

3745–18–86 ‘‘Union County emission 

limits.’’, 3745–18–87 ‘‘Van Wert County 

emission limits.’’, 3745–18–88 ‘‘Vinton 

County emission limits.’’, 3745–18–89 

‘‘Warren County emission limits.’’, 

3745–18–91 ‘‘Wayne County emission 

limits.’’, 3745–18–92 ‘‘Williams County 

emission limits.’’, 3745–18–93 ‘‘Wood 

County emission limits.’’, 3745–18–94 

‘‘Wyandot County emission limits.’’, 

adopted on February 7, 2011, effective 

February 17, 2011. 

(B) February 7, 2011, ‘‘Director’s Final 

Findings and Orders’’, signed by Scott J. 

Nally, Director, Ohio Environmental 

Protection Agency, adopting the rules 

identified in paragraph (160)(i)(A) of 

this section. 

(C) Ohio Administrative Code Rules 

3745–18–01 ‘‘Definitions and 

incorporation by reference.’’, 3745–18– 

54 ‘‘Lucas County emission limits.’’, 

3745–18–82 ‘‘Stark County emission 

limits.’’, adopted on March 24, 2011, 

effective April 3, 2011. 

(D) March 24, 2011, ‘‘Director’s Final 

Findings and Orders’’, signed by Scott J. 

Nally, Director, Ohio Environmental 

Protection Agency, adopting the rules 

identified in paragraph (160)(i)(C) of 

this section. 

■ 3. Section 52.1881 is amended by 

revising paragraph (a)(4) to read as 

follows: 

§ 52.1881 Control strategy: Sulfur oxides 

(sulfur dioxide). 

(a) * * * 

(4) Notwithstanding the portions of 

this section that EPA has either 

disapproved or taken no action on, EPA 

has approved a complete plan 

addressing all counties in the State of 

Ohio. In addition, specific approved 

rules are listed in § 52.1870. 

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2013–27561 Filed 11–18–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 300 

[EPA–HQ–SFUND–1910–0010; FRL 9902– 

79–Region 9] 

National Oil and Hazardous 

Substances Pollution Contingency 

Plan; National Priorities List: Partial 

Deletion of the El Toro Marine Corps 

Air Station Superfund Site 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency. 

ACTION: Direct final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) Region IX is publishing a 

direct final Notice of Deletion of 

portions of the El Toro Marine Corp Air 

Station Superfund Site (Site), located in 

Irvine, California, from the National 

Priorities List (NPL). The NPL, 

promulgated pursuant to section 105 of 

the Comprehensive Environmental 

Response, Compensation, and Liability 

Act (CERCLA) of 1980, as amended, is 

an appendix of the National Oil and 

Hazardous Substances Pollution 

Contingency Plan (NCP). This direct 

final partial deletion is being published 

by EPA with the concurrence of the 

State of California through the 

Department of Toxic Substances Control 

(DTSC), because EPA has determined 

that all appropriate response actions at 

these identified parcels under CERCLA 

have been completed. However, this 

partial deletion does not preclude future 

actions under Superfund. 

This partial deletion pertains to all 

Site media, including soil and 

groundwater, of parcels I–A, II–A, III–A, 

II–J, II–Q, II–S, II–T, III–C, I–C, II–U, I– 

B, I–E, I–G, I–H, I–I, I–J, I–L, I–M, I–P, 

II–G, II–I, II–P, III–D, I–K, I–N, I–O, I– 

S, II–E, II–L, II–M, II–R, I–Q, I–R, II–B, 

II–K, and II–O of the Site. The current 

remaining areas of the Site will remain 

on the NPL and are not being 

considered for deletion as part of this 

action. 

DATES: This direct final partial deletion 

is effective January 21, 2014 unless EPA 

receives adverse comments by 

December 19, 2013. If adverse 

comments are received, EPA will 

publish a timely withdrawal of the 

direct final partial deletion in the 

Federal Register informing the public 

that the partial deletion will not take 

effect. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID no. EPA–HQ– 

SFUND–1910–0010, by one of the 

following methods: 

• http://www.regulations.gov. Follow 

on-line instructions for submitting 

comments. 

• Email: Aycock.Mary@epa.gov. 

• Fax: (415) 947–3528. 

• Mail: Mary Aycock, U.S. EPA 

Remedial Project Manager, U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region IX, Mail Code SFD–8–1, 75 

Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 

94105. 

• Hand delivery: Mary Aycock, U.S. 

EPA Remedial Project Manager, U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region IX, Mail Code SFD81, 75 

Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 

94105. Such deliveries are only 

accepted during the Docket’s normal 

hours of operation, and special 

arrangements should be made for 

deliveries of boxed information. 

Instructions: Direct your comments to 

Docket ID no. EPA–HQ–SFUND–1910– 

0010. EPA’s policy is that all comments 

received will be included in the public 

docket without change and may be 

made available online at http://

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information provided, unless 

the comment includes information 

claimed to be Confidential Business 

Information (CBI) or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Do not submit information that you 

consider to be CBI or otherwise 

protected through http://

www.regulations.gov or email. The 

http://www.regulations.gov Web site is 

an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which 

means EPA will not know your identity 

or contact information unless you 

provide it in the body of your comment. 

If you send an email comment directly 

to EPA without going through http://

www.regulations.gov, your email 

address will be automatically captured 

and included as part of the comment 

that is placed in the public docket and 

made available on the Internet. If you 

submit an electronic comment, EPA 

recommends that you include your 

name and other contact information in 

the body of your comment and with any 

disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA 

cannot read your comment due to 

technical difficulties and cannot contact 

you for clarification, EPA may not be 

able to consider your comment. 

Electronic files should avoid the use of 

special characters, any form of 


TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES