alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 8**

 

***Amcor’s Significant Subsidiaries as at December 20, 2004 were:***

 
| ** **                                    | ** ** | **Country of  Incorporation** | ** ** | **Percentage  Held by Parent  Entities** | ** ** |
|-----------------------------------------------|------------|-------------------------------|------------|------------------------------------------|------------|
| Amcor Investments Pty. Ltd.                   |       | Australia                     |       | 100                                      | %          |
| Amcor Packaging (New Zealand) Ltd.            |       | New Zealand                   |       | 100                                      | %          |
| Amcor Packaging (U.S.A.), Inc.                |       | U.S.A.                        |       | 100                                      | %          |
| Amcor Sunclipse – North America, Inc.    |       | U.S.A.                        |       | 100                                      | %          |
| Amcor Europe                                  |       | United Kingdom                |       | 100                                      | %          |
| Amcor Packaging Asia Pty. Ltd.                |       | Australia                     |       | 100                                      | %          |
| Amcor Packaging (Australia) Pty. Ltd.         |       | Australia                     |       | 100                                      | %          |
| Amcor European Holdings Pty. Ltd.             |       | Australia                     |       | 100                                      | %          |
| Amcor European Consolidated Holdings  Limited |       | Cyprus                        |       | 100                                      | %          |
| Amcor Holding                                 |       | United Kingdom                |       | 100                                      | %          |
| Amcor Flexibles A/S                           |       | Denmark                       |       | 100                                      | %          |

 

----
Total U.S. Exports to  Tonga

Data in Thousand Dollars 

Data For  JUN. 1999

|Group                   | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | Year to Date 6/1998 | Year to Date 6/1999 | % Change | Year Ending 6/1998 | Year Ending 6/1999 | % Change | % Share
|----------------------- | ---- | ---- | ---- | ---- | ------------------- | ------------------- | -------- | ------------------ | ------------------ | -------- | -------
|TEXTILES & APPAREL      | 168  | 119  | 119  | 161  | 108                 | 243                 | 124.5    | 208                | 296                | 42.06    | 0      
|TOTAL APPAREL           | 105  | 70   | 100  | 133  | 80                  | 112                 | 39.86    | 161                | 164                | 2.29     | 0      
|TEXTILE MILL PRODUCTS   | 63   | 49   | 19   | 28   | 28                  | 132                 | 361.94   | 48                 | 132                | 176.26   | 0      
|Made-Up Arts            | 34   | 33   | 3    | 14   | 14                  | 132                 | 863.37   | 17                 | 132                | 682.87   | 0.01   
|Underwear exc fnd grmts | 81   | 63   | 97   | 133  | 80                  | 108                 | 35.01    | 158                | 161                | 1.62     | 0.02   
|Other Made-Up Articles  | 0    | 0    | 3    | 0    | 0                   | 132                 |          | 3                  | 132                | 4078.29  | 0.02
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Surface Transportation Board

          - [STB Ex Parte No. 290 (Sub-No. 5) (2006-4)]

# AGENCY:

Surface Transportation Board, DOT.

# ACTION:

Approval of rail cost adjustment factor.

# SUMMARY:

The Board has approved the fourth quarter 2006 rail cost adjustment factor (RCAF) and cost index filed by the Association of American Railroads. The fourth quarter 2006 RCAF (Unadjusted) is 1.250. The fourth quarter 2006 RCAF (Adjusted) is 0.591. The fourth quarter 2006 RCAF-5 is 0.562.

# DATES:

Effective Date: October 1, 2006.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mac Frampton, (202) 565-1541. [Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) for the hearing impaired: 1-800-877-8339.]

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Additional information is contained in the Board's decision, which is available on our Web site                     *http://www.stb.dot.gov.*                     To purchase a copy of the full decision, write to, e-mail or call the Board's contractor, ASAP Document Solutions; 9332 Annapolis Rd., Suite 103, Lanham, MD 20706;                     *e-mail asapdc@verizon.net*; phone (202) 306-4004. [Assistance for the hearing impaired is available through FIRS: 1-800-877-8339.]                

This action will not significantly affect either the quality of the human environment or energy conservation.

Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b), we conclude that our action will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities within the meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

*Decided:*                         September 14, 2006.                    

By the Board, Chairman Nottingham, Vice Chairman Mulvey and Commissioner Buttrey.

Vernon A. Williams,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 06-8099 Filed 9-21-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
Uateor 

report 

- ---

196'7 

Oct. 11 

11 

11 

11 

11 

11 

11 

11 

I 

irttatr of tqr luitr~ itntrs 

NINETIETH CONGRESS 

FIRST SESSION-Began January 10, 1967 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Prepared unde1' the direction of FRANCIS R. VALEO, Secretary of the Senate 

By GERALD A. HACKETT, Executive Clerk 

Thursday, October 12, 1967 

NOMINATIONS 

Cailodar I Messa::re Name or nominee Office Predeoesaor 

1 No No 

I ~ 

I SOLICITOR GENERAL 

OF THE UNITED STATES 

1367 378 Erwin N. Griswold, of Solicitor General of the Thurgood Marshall. 

Massachusetts. United States. 

DEPARTMENT OF 

JUSTICE 

1368 340 Lawrence A. Wh1pple, of U.S dbtrict judge for the Thomas F. Meaney, 

New J ersey. d1strict of New Jersey. retired. 

1369 354 Juan T. Fernandez-Badillo, U.S district Judge for the H1ram R. Cancio. 

of Pnerto Rico d1strict of Puerto Rico. 

1370 370 Damon J. Keith, of Mich- US district judge for the Thomas P. Thornton, 

igan. eastern district of Mich- retired. 

igan. 

1371 326 William A. Meadows, of U.S attorney for the south- Reappointment. 

Florida. ern district of Florida for 

the term of 4 years. 

1372 355 Calvin K. Hamilton, of U.S attorney for the west- F. Russell Millin, 

Missouri. ern district of Missouri resigned. 

for the term of 4 years. 

1373 356 Yoshimi Hayashi, of U.S attorney for the d1s- Herman T. F. Lum, 

Hawaii. trict of Hawaii for the resigned. 

term of 4 years. 

1374 327 Guy W. Hixon, of Florida __ U.S. marshal for the south- Reappointment. 

ern district of Florida for 

the term of 4 years. 

85-022--67--No.99 

IOYERNIU"NT PRIHTJNQ OfP'ICl 1 1117
Exhibit
10.34


 


Extension
Agreement to Radiant Life Promissory Note


 


Reference
is made to the Promissory note by and between the undersigned parties, Sundance Strategies, Inc. and Radiant Life dated November
3, 2014.


 


Be
it known, that for good consideration the parties made the following additions or changes to the contract as if contained therein:


 


	 	1.	Due
    date for this note is extended to the earlier of August 31, 2021 or at the immediate time when the anticipated additional
    raise of funds is successful. Radiant is also willing to continue to extend the due date of this note if requested in the
    future.


 


All
other terms and provisions shall remain in full force and effect.


 


	Radiant
    Life	 
	 	 
	 	/s/
    Mitch Burton	 
	By:	Mitch
    Burton, It’s Manager	 


 


Signed
this 19 day of December 2019.


 


	Sundance
    Strategies, Inc.	 
	 	 
	 	/s/
    Randall F. Pearson	 
	By:	Randall
    F. Pearson, It’s President	 


 


Signed
this 18th day of December 2019.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Form 10-Q
and is qualified in its entirety to such financial statements (in thousands,
except per share data)
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          13,649
<SECURITIES>                                    10,240
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,508
<ALLOWANCES>                                        57
<INVENTORY>                                         16
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                27,368
<PP&E>                                           2,575
<DEPRECIATION>                                     894
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  33,650
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,016
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            11
<OTHER-SE>                                      33,639
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    33,650
<SALES>                                          5,399
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,399
<CGS>                                            6,576
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   21,909
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 802
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (15,708)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (15,708)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (15,708)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (3.30)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (3.30)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                   AS ADDED BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Heartland,  Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period  ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Jeffrey Brandeis,
President of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.  1350, as added by
ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     A.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     B.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.


                                          By: /s/ Jeffrey Brandeis
                                          -----------------------------------
                                          Jeffrey Brandeis
                                          President
                                          August 24, 2004

A signed  original  of this  written  statement  required  by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 ("Section  906"), or other document  authenticating,
acknowledging,  or otherwise  adopting the signature  that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906,
has been  provided to  Inmternaqtional  Wireless,  Inc.  and will be retained by
Inmternaqtional  Wireless,  Inc. and  furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Dion Lee THOMPSON, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 03-4730.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 27, 2004.

Decided June 2, 2004.

*482Hervery B.O. Young, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellant. Elizabeth Jean Howard, Office of the United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM.

Dion Lee Thompson appeals his guilty plea conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute fifty grams or more of cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 (2000). Thompson’s attorney has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), raising one issue, but stating that he finds no meritorious grounds for appeal. Thompson did not file a pro se supplemental brief, despite being informed of his right to do so. The Government declined to file a brief.

In the *Anders*brief, counsel questions whether the district court properly complied with the requirements of Fed. R.Crim.P. 11 when accepting Thompson’s guilty plea. Because Thompson failed to object or move to withdraw his guilty plea, this court reviews his plea hearing for plain error. *United States v. Martinez,*277 F.3d 517, 524-27 (4th Cir.), *cert. denied,*537 U.S. 899, 123 S.Ct. 200, 154 L.Ed.2d 169 (2002). After a close review of the plea proceedings, we conclude that the district court thoroughly complied with the requirements of Rule 11.

In accordance with *Anders,*we have reviewed the entire record in this case and have found no meritorious issues for appeal. We, therefore, affirm Thompson’s conviction and sentence, and we deny Thompson’s motion to reheve counsel and appoint substitute counsel. This court requires that counsel inform her client, in writing, of his right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further review. If the client requests that a petition be filed, but counsel believes that such petition would be frivolous, then counsel may move in this court for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must state that a copy thereof was served on the client. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
Editorial Note on Part 7
Editorial Note: The Alphabetical Listing is updated annually by the Office of the Federal Register.

§ 7.87 Kaloko-Honokohau National Historical Park. ( a ) *Is public nudity prohibited at Kaloko-Honokohau National Historical Park?* Yes. Public nudity, including nude bathing, by any person on Federal land or water within the boundaries of Kaloko-Honokohau National Historical Park is prohibited. This section does not apply to a person under 10 years of age.
( b ) *What is public nudity?* Public nudity is a person's failure, when in a public place, to cover with a fully opaque covering that person's genitals, pubic areas, rectal area or female breast below a point immediately above the top of the areola.
( c ) *What is a public place?* A public place is any area of Federal land or water subject to Federal jurisdiction within the boundaries of Kaloko-Honokohau National Historical Park, except the enclosed portions of restrooms or other structures designed for privacy or similar purposes.
[64 FR 19483, Apr. 21, 1999]
#### § 251.111 Definitions.

In addition to the definitions in subpart B of this part, the following terms apply to this subpart:

*Access* means the ability of landowners to have ingress and egress to their lands. It does not include rights-of-way for power lines or other utilities.

*Adequate access* means a route and method of access to non-Federal land that provides for reasonable use and enjoyment of the non-Federal land consistent with similarly situated non-Federal land and that minimizes damage or disturbance to National Forest System lands and resources.

*Congressionally designated area* means lands which are within the boundaries of a component of the National Wilderness Preservation System, National Wild and Scenic River System, National Trails System, and also National Monuments, Recreation, and Scenic Areas within the National Forest System, and similar areas designated by Federal statute.

*Landowner(s)* means the owner(s) of non-Federal land or interests in land within the boundaries of the National Forest System.
Exhibit 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Michael L. Weiner, Chief Executive Officer of Biophan Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company"), certify to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 30, 2006 of the
Company, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report, fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                        Date: January 24, 2007


                                        /s/ Michael L. Weiner
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Michael L. Weiner
                                        Chief Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT 32.1****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER****Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**          In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of The Meridian Resource Corporation (the“Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Form 10-K/A”), I, Joseph A. Reeves, Jr., Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1. The Form 10-K/A fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Form 10-K/A fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.Date: April 29, 2008                                                    /s/ Joseph A. Reeves, Jr.   Joseph A. Reeves, Jr.   Chief Executive Officer
Need to return call by / at/between and . Signature: ___________________________ 

Project No.: 0172.07.029.030 DISTRIBUTION 

Page _1_ of __2_

Project Name: Steam Electric Detailed Study 

TELEPHONE CALL RECORD 

 Outgoing Call 

Date: 12/2/09 Time: 2:00 pm EST 

Company Name: Tampa Electric’s Big Bend Power Plant

Contact Name: Kevin Young (Big Bend) and Donna Hill 

(UWAG) 

Phone No.: 813-228-4232 

Name: Kurt Blohm Eastern Research Group 

GENERAL SUBJECT : Tampa Electric’s Big Bend Power Plant FGD Wastewater Treatment System

 

TOPICS DISCUSSED AND ACTION TAKEN 

On Wednesday, December 2, 2009, I contacted Kevin Young of Big Bend Power Plant (Big Bend) and left a 

message for him to call me back to discuss Big Bend’s FGD System and FGD Wastewater treatment system. I 

explained that EPA is will be conducting sampling episodes at several power plants to collect wastewater 

samples from FGD wastewater treatment systems, and that the information collected on the call would help 

EPA make decisions about facilities it may sample during the rulemaking. Shortly after I left the message, 

Kevin called back with Donna Hill of Utility Water Act Group (UWAG) on the line. 

Mr. Young stated that there are four generating units on site, all of which burn eastern bituminous coal. There 

are two limestone forced oxidation FGD systems on site. Units 1 and 2 exhaust to one FGD system, while Units 

3 and 4 exhaust to the other FGD system. Both FGD systems use dibasic acid additive. 

Mr. Young stated that Units 2, 3, and 4 operate SCRs for NOx removal. Big Bend is planning to begin operation 

on the Unit 1 SCR in May 2010. The SCRs all operate on a year-round basis. 

Mr. Young confirmed that the FGD wastewater treatment plant consists of the following unit operations: 

 Equalization tank; 

 pH adjustment (lime addition); 

 Ferric chloride addition; 

 Mixing tank; 

 Flocculating polymer addition; 

 Clarification; 

o Overflow to pH adjustment (hydrochloric acid addition); 

o Underflow to filter press; and 

o Filtrate recycled back to equalization tank. 

 Filtration. 

Mr. Young stated that the purpose of the lime is to adjust the pH for the addition of ferric chloride. The ferric 

chloride precipitates out constituents in the wastewater. The hydrochloric acid is used as a final pH adjustment 

prior to discharge. The effluent of the wastewater treatment system is combined with once-through cooling 

water prior to discharge. The wastewater treatment system is operated continuously during normal operation. 
Need to return call by / at/between and . Signature: ___________________________ 

Mr. Young stated that Big Bend has regular outages during the Spring, but that he did not know the specific 

dates of the outages. Ms. Hill stated that the dates of outages are considered confidential information. Mr. 

Young gave me his email address and told me to follow up on the questions he was unable to answer.
Date of 

report 

1969 

Mar. 24 

25 

25 

&tuutt nf tqt luittb itutra 

NINETY-FIRST CONGRESS 

FIRST SESSION {Convened January 3, 1969 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Prepared under the direction of FRANCIS R. V ALEO, Secretary of the Senate 

By GERALD A. HACKETT, Executive Clerk 

Wednesday, March 26, 1969 

NOMINATIONS 

Oalendar Message Name of nominee Office Predecessor 

No. No. 

DEPARTMENT OF 

JUSTICE 

272 207 Charles H. Rogovin, of Administrator of Law 

Massachusetts. Enforcement Assistance. 

DEPARTMENT OF 

LABOR 

273 148 Jerome M. Rosow, of An Assistant Secretary of 

New York. Labor. 

APPALACHIAN 

REGIONAL 

COMMISSION 

274 271 John B. Waters, Jr., of Federal cochairman of the 

Tennessee. Appalachian Regional 

Commission. 

*(Star Print) 98-022-69-No. 21 

U.S. IOVERNMEHT PRIHTUfG OFFICEr UU