alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). N H Y / R es ear ch NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON

UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T LUI S ANTON I O H ERNA ND EZ C AMAC HO , P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E RJ r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N os . 07- 72328 07- 74065 A ge nc yN o. A 096- 166- 398 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i ons f

orR e vi e w of

O r de r s of

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d F e bruary16, 2010 ** B efo re: F E RN A N D E Z , G O U L D , an dM . S M IT H , C i rcu i tJu d g es. In these consol i dat ed pet i t i on s f or re vi ew , L ui s A nt on i o H ernand ez C a m a c ho, ana t i ve and c i t i z e n of M e xi c o, pe t i t i ons f

orr e vi e w of

the B oar d of I m m i gr a t i on A ppe a l s ’ ( “ B I A ” ) or de rdi s m i s s i ng hi s appe a l f r om an i m m i gr a t i on 

# FI LED FEB 25 2 010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSN H Y / Res ea r ch 07- 74065 2 ju d g e’s d ec isio n d en yin g h is ap p li ca ti o n fo r c an ce ll atio n o f r em o v al, an dth e B IA ’s o r d e rd e n y in g h is m o tio n to r e o p e n . W e h av e ju r is d ic tio n u n d e r8 U .S .C . § 1 2 5 2 . W e r e v ie w d e n o v o qu e s tio n s o f law , in c lu d in g du e p r o c e s s v io la tio n s , V a sq u ezZa v a la v . A s h c r o

ft , 324 F . 3d 1105, 1107 ( 9th C i r . 2003) , and f orabus e of d is c r e tio n th e d e n ia l o f

am o tio n to r e o p e n , P er ezv. Mukasey , 516 F . 3d 770, 773 ( 9 th C i r . 2 0 0 8 ) . We d e n yb o th p e t i t i o n s f o rr e v i e w. C o n tr aryto H e rn an d e z C a m a c h o ’s c o n te n tio n th a t h is du e p r o c e s s r ig h ts w ere v i o l at edb ecau se o f a tran scri p terro r, th e p ro ceed i n g s w ere n o t“ so fund am ent al l y unfai r thathe w as prevent ed fr om re as on abl y pre se nt i ng hi s c as e. ” Co lm e n a rv . I

NS , 21 0 F . 3d 96 7, 97 1 (9th C i r. 20 00 ) ( ci t at i on om i tt ed). M oreover, H e rnande z C a m a c ho f

a i l e d t o de m ons tr a t e thatr e doi ng the tr ans c r i ptw oul d have a f f e c te dth e o u tc o m e o f

th e p r o c e e d in g s . Se e id . ( r e qui r i ng pr e j udi c e t o pr e va i l on a due process chal l enge). T h e B IA d idn o t ab u se it s d iscr etio n ind en yin g H ern an d ez C am ac h o ’s m ot i on t o r e ope n w he r e he f a i l e d t o s how s t a tut orye l i gi bi l i tyf orc anc e l l a t i on of r e m o v a l. See 8 C .F .R . § 1 0 0 3 .2 ( c ) ( 1 ) ; s e ea l s o Si n gh v . I

NS , 295 F . 3d 1037, 1039 (9th C i r. 20 02 ).N H Y / Res ea r ch 07- 74065 3 I n lig h t o f

o u rd is p o s itio n , P e titio n e r ’s m o tio n to s up p le m e n t th e r e c o r dis d e n ie da s m o o t. P E T I T I ON S F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.
Rev 0 (9/08)

Comments in Response to 

“Final rule; request for comments”

Docket: FAA-2013-0871 Directorate Identifier 2013-NM-187-AD

Comments have been received in response to: “Final rule; request for comments,”

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket and Directorate Identifier entered above. 

(Project engineer: Please review any comments to determine if additional action is warranted.

Once you have made your determination, please fill in the commenter(s) name(s) and check the 

appropriate response below. Include additional information following the appropriate response, 

if necessary. Then include your name and the date in the spaces provided, and return it to the 

AD directorate focal.

The FAA has reviewed comment(s) related to the above FAA Docket that we received from: The 

Boeing Company and Anonymous.

(Please check one)

 These comments have not been found to contain any information to warrant reconsideration 

or change of this AD.

 These comments have been found to contain information that warrants consideration of 

additional regulatory action. (SEE Airworthiness Directives Manual 

FAA-IR-M-8040.1 FOR ADDITIONAL ACTION.)

______Nathan Weigand_____ 4/10/14__

Name: Date:

(This form is part of the official docket file for this AD action.)
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 161 (Wednesday, August 20, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 49368]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-19778]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8828]

In the Matter of the Designation of Mujahidin Shura Council in 
the Environs of Jerusalem (MSC), Also Known as MSC, Also Known as 
Mujahideen Shura Council in the Environs of Jerusalem, Also Known as 
Mujahideen Shura Council, Also Known as Majlis Shura al-Mujahedin Fi 
Aknaf Bayt al-Maqdis, Also Known as Majlis Shura al-Mujahidin, Also 
Known as Majlis Shura al-Mujahideen, Also Known as Magles Shoura al-
Mujahddin, as a Foreign Terrorist Organization Pursuant to Section 219, 
of the Immigration and Nationality Act, as Amended

    Based upon a review of the Administrative Record assembled in this 
matter and in consultation with the Attorney General and the Secretary 
of the Treasury, I conclude that there is a sufficient factual basis to 
find that the relevant circumstances described in section 219 of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act, as amended (hereinafter ``INA'') (8 
U.S.C. 1189), exist with respect to Mujahidin Shura Council in the 
Environs of Jerusalem (MSC), also known as MSC, also known as 
Mujahideen Shura Council in the Environs of Jerusalem, also known as 
Mujahideen Shura Council, also known as Majlis Shura al-Mujahedin Fi 
Aknaf Bayt al-Maqdis, also known as Majlis Shura al-Mujahidin, also 
known as Majlis Shura al-Mujahideen, also known as Magles Shoura al-
Mujahddin.
    Therefore, I hereby designate the aforementioned organization and 
its aliases as a Foreign Terrorist Organization pursuant to section 219 
of the INA.
    This determination shall be published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: August 1, 2014.
John F. Kerry,
Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2014-19778 Filed 8-19-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
```
Date of 

report 

1970 

Sept. 25 

NINETY-FIRST CONGRESS 

F S { Convened January 3, 1969 

IRST ESSION Adjourned December 23, 1969 

S S { Convened January 19, 1970 

ECOND ESSION 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Prepared under the direction of FRANCIS R. V ALEO, Secretary of the Senate 

By GERALD A HACKETT, Executive Clerk 

Monday, September 28, 1970 

NOMINATION 

Calendar Message Name ofnommee 

I 

Office Predecessor 

No No 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

173 197 Malcolm R Lovell, Jr, of An Ass1st::mt Secretary of Arnold R WC'brr. 

M1ehtgan Labor 

48-022--70--No.222 

U S GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1970
2012 Martin

Dear Mr. Martin 

### City of 

### Pelican is aware that our 

### to Service program.

Semmens 

### City Administrator adding a Alaska 

### seatfloat fleet service in
Form 1024 must be submitted electronically through 

Pay.gov. You can access the most recent version of the 

form at Pay.gov.

Go to http://www.irs.gov/Form1024 for more information.
#### § 293.9 [Reserved]
# EUR-Lex - 12005SP009 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12005SP009

**Protocol concerning the conditions and arrangements for admission of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania to the European Union - PART ONE:PRINCIPLES - Article 9 **

*
Official Journal L 157 , 21/06/2005 P. 0032 - 0032 *

Article 9

The application of the Constitution and acts adopted by the institutions shall, as a transitional measure, be subject to the derogations provided for in this Protocol.

--------------------------------------------------
INVENTORY EXPERT SERVICE REPORT

Please print the above CA Index Name on the appropriate page of your PMN.

If this box is checked, CAS has made correction(s) marked in red to your IES order. 

Please make the same corrections to your PMN before submitting it to the EPA.

A	division	of	the	American	Chemical	Society	 Phone:	800-631-1884,	614-447-3870

Fax:	614-447-3747

E-mail: answers@cas.org

Web: www.cas.org/products/other-cas-products/client-services/

InventoryExpertService

CAS					•					2540 Olentangy River Road					•					P.O. Box 3343					•					Columbus, OH		43210-0334					•					USA

,(62UGHU1XPEHU

5HJLVWU\1XPEHU

&$,QGH[1DPH

3URSDQHWULROKRPRSRO\PHUGRGHFDQRDWH
#### Hemphill v. Commonwealth.

(Decided January 29, 1918).

Appeal from Bell Circuit Court.

Criminal Law — Indictment and Information — Charging Two Persons with Act of Shooting and Wounding. — The fault in an indictment, that charged two persons with the single act of shooting and wounding another person with the intent to kill, was cured by the dismissal, before the trial, of the indictment as to one of the persons.

L. F. DE BUSK and J. G. ROLLINS for appellant.

CHARLES H. MORRIS, Attorney General, and HENRY F. TURNER, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Carroll

Affirming.

The appellant and John Powers were charged in one indictment with unlawfully, wilfully and maliciously shooting at and wounding Edna Cooper with intent to kill her. After a demurrer to the indictment had been overruled, the case went to trial, and the jury found the appellant guilty and fixed her punishment at confinement in the state penitentiary for one year. From the judgment on this verdict she prosecutes this appeal.

It is said that the trial court committed error in not sustaining the demurrer to the indictment upon the ground that it charged two persons with the single act of shooting and wounding Edna Cooper. It would be a sufficient answer to this to say that no exception was saved to the ruling of the court. But passing this, before the trial the indictment was dismissed as to John Powers, and this dismissal certainly cured the error, if any, in the indictment.

The instructions are criticised, but we find no fault in them, nor was any error committed in admitting in rebuttal the evidence of John Powers.

The argument- that the appellant was justified in shooting, and therefore should have been acquitted, or, at any rate, punished by no more than a jail sentence under section 1242 of the Kentucky Statutes, is asking us to rule that the evidence was not sufficient to authorize the finding of the jury. This we cannot do, as there was sufficient evidence to sustain the conviction.

The judgment is affirmed.
§ 6.7 Mining wastes. ( a ) Solid waste from mining includes but is not limited to mining overburden, mining byproducts, solid waste from the extraction, processing and beneficiation of ores and minerals, drilling fluids, produced waters, and other wastes associated with exploration, development, or production of oil, natural gas or geothermal energy and any garbage, refuse or sludge associated with mining and mineral operations.
( b ) A person conducting mining or mineral operations on January 23, 1995, and not governed by a plan of operations approved under 36 CFR part 9, Minerals Management, or pursuant to the terms of a Federal mineral lease, may continue to operate a solid waste disposal site within the boundaries of a unit only after complying with § 6.5 and § 6.10 and with a permit issued by the Regional Director under § 6.9.
( c ) A person conducting mining or mineral operations on January 23, 1995, and governed by a plan of operations approved under 36 CFR part 9 or pursuant to the terms of a Federal mineral lease may continue to operate a solid waste disposal site under the terms of the approved plan of operations or lease. Where an existing mining or mineral operation is governed by 36 CFR part 9 or a Federal mineral lease, an NPS-approved plan of operations will constitute the permit for solid waste disposal site operation otherwise required under § 6.9. A bond required under 36 CFR part 9, or by the Bureau of Land Management for Federal lessees, will satisfy the requirements of § 6.10.
( d ) A person proposing to initiate mining or mineral operations after January 23, 1995, within the boundaries of a unit of the National Park System, whether or not governed by a plan of operations approved under 36 CFR part 9 or the terms of a Federal mineral lease, may not establish or operate a new solid waste disposal site within a unit.
( e ) The temporary storage, stockpiling for return, or return of nonhazardous mining overburden to the mine site for the purpose of mine site reclamation does not require a request, environmental report, financial assurance or a permit issued under this part.
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 200 (Tuesday, October 17, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 61031]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-8753]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

Time and Date: 11 a.m., Friday, November 3, 2006.

Place: 1155 21st., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission Conference 
Room.

Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered: Surveillance Matters.

FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT: Eileen A. Donovan, 202-418-5100.

Eileen A. Donovan,
Acting Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 06-8753 Filed 10-13-06; 2:04 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
#### § 28.14 Emergency action.

If allowable by local law and if immediate action is essential to avoid or eliminate an immediate threat to the public health or safety or a serious and immediate threat to private property or natural resources, an agency or person may commence a temporary use without a permit from the zoning authority. In all cases, the agency or person shall inform the Superintendent and send an application for a permit to the zoning authority within 10 days after the commencement of the use and the applicant shall proceed in full compliance with the provisions of the approved local zoning ordinance. When the reasons for undertaking the emergency action no longer exist, the agency or person shall cease an emergency action taken under this section.
§ 64.7 Project selection and funding procedures. ( a ) The Bureau of Outdoor Recreation Regional Office will review all preapplications and Federal proposals to insure application completeness and eligibility. A copy of eligible preapplications or Federal proposals and supporting information and data will be submitted to the Washington Office of BOR for final review and selection. An information copy of each project preapplication and proposal will be submitted to the State Liaison Officer designated to coordinate Land and Water Conservation Fund activities.
( b ) The Washington Office of the Bureau of Outdoor Recreation will evaluate all projects submitted by the Regional Offices. Final selection of projects to be funded shall be by the Director of the Bureau of Outdoor Recreation.
( c ) State and local projects selected for funding will be approved and funds obligated by the appropriate Regional Director. Funds will not be obligated until the Bureau has met with the applicant to discuss the terms, conditions, and procedures required by the grant.
( d ) Federal agency sponsored projects will be funded by transfer of funds from the Bureau of Outdoor Recreation to the sponsoring agency up to the amount of the project cost as shown in the agency's approved application.
[42 FR 54806, Oct. 11, 1977. Redesignated at 45 FR 780, Jan. 3, 1980, and 46 FR 34329, July 1, 1981, as amended at 60 FR 55791, Nov. 3, 1995]
Editorial Note on Part 7
Editorial Note: The Alphabetical Listing is updated annually by the Office of the Federal Register.

§ 7.95 Pea Ridge National Military Park. ( a ) *Bicycle use.* ( 1 ) The Superintendent may designate all or portions of the following trails as open to bicycle use: ( i ) A trail from U.S. Highway 62 to the visitor center (approximately 0.55 miles).
( ii ) A trail from Arkansas Highway 72 to the Sugar Creek Greenway on the western edge of the park (approximately 1.17 miles).
( 2 ) A map showing trails open to bicycle use will be available at park visitor centers and posted on the park website. The Superintendent will provide notice of all bicycle route designations in accordance with § 1.7 of this chapter. The Superintendent may limit, restrict, or impose conditions on bicycle use, or close any trail to bicycle use, or terminate such conditions, closures, limits, or restrictions in accordance with § 4.30 of this chapter.
( b ) [Reserved]
[83 FR 48380, Sept. 25, 2018]
Total U.S. Exports to  Afghanistan

Data in Thousand Dollars 

Data For  JUN. 1999

|Group              | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | Year to Date 6/1998 | Year to Date 6/1999 | % Change | Year Ending 6/1998 | Year Ending 6/1999 | % Change | % Share
|------------------ | ---- | ---- | ---- | ---- | ------------------- | ------------------- | -------- | ------------------ | ------------------ | -------- | -------
|TEXTILES & APPAREL | 39   | 212  | 303  | 18   | 5                   | 614                 | 11732.47 | 35                 | 627                | 1668.7   | 0      
|TOTAL APPAREL      | 12   | 16   | 10   | 9    | 0                   | 541                 |          | 6                  | 550                | 9068.25  | 0.01   
|Other Apparel      |      | 0    | 0    | 4    | 0                   | 529                 |          | 0                  | 533                |          | 0.04
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 22, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-20764

Summary Calendar

FRED PHILLIP WARNER,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL

JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION,

Respondent-Appellee.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

No. 4:03-CV-1932

--------------------

Before SMITH, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Fred Warner challenges his conviction of aggravated assault

with a deadly weapon. He contends that counsel’s failure to object

to three convictions listed in enhancement paragraphs resulted in

his being sentenced to 35 years of imprisonment as an habitual
No. 04-20764

-2-

offender pursuant to TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 12.42(d) (Vernon 2003),

within a range of life or 25-99 years of imprisonment, instead of

as a first degree felon pursuant to TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 12.42(b)

(Vernon 2003), within a range of life or 5-99 years.

Warner has not rebutted the correctness of the finding of the

Texas Court of Appeals that he was sentenced pursuant to § 12.42(b)

by clear and convincing evidence. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254(e)(1). He

thus cannot demonstrate prejudice arising from counsel’s failure to

object to the enhancement paragraphs. See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 694 (1984). 

Warner also states that, because the state failed to present

evidence regarding his prior convictions, his sentence should have

been 2-20 years. He does not contend, however, that counsel was

ineffective for advising him to plead “true,” so he has failed to

raise a meritorious ineffective-assistance contention. See Long v.

McCotter, 792 F.2d 1338, 1342 (5th Cir. 1986) (stating that a

“true” plea “waive[d] subsequent challenges to the validity of the

prior conviction[s] set forth in the charge”). 

AFFIRMED.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**HEARTLAND, INC.**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUNT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Heartland, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Trent Sommerville, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as added by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.         The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.         The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.

 

By: /s/ Trent Sommerville

Trent Sommerville

Chief Executive Officer, and

Chairman of the Board

 

May 16, 2005

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ("Section 906"), or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Heartland, Inc., and will be retained by Heartland, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
| (1) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-139190) pertaining to the Employee Stock Option Plan, as amended and restated, the 2006 Stock Incentive Plan and individual director options agreements of Emergent BioSolutions, Inc., |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-161154) pertaining to the Employee Stock Option Plan, as amended and restated, and the 2006 Stock Incentive Plan of Emergent BioSolutions, Inc., |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (3) | Registration Statement (Form S-4 No. 333-169351) of Emergent BioSolutions Inc. and Subsidiaries, |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (4) | Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-181133) of Emergent BioSolutions Inc. and Subsidiaries, |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (5) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-184699) pertaining to the 2012 Employee Stock Option Plan and the Second Amended and Restated Emergent BioSolutions Inc. 2006 Stock Incentive Plan, and |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (6) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-196232) pertaining to the Third Amended and Restated Emergent BioSolutions Inc. 2006 Stock Incentive Plan; |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
§ 13.1156 Exceptions from vessel permit requirement. A vessel permit is not required in Glacier Bay when: ( a ) A motor vessel is engaged in official, non-commercial business of the State or Federal Government;
( b ) A motor vessel is operating in Bartlett Cove waters east of a line extending from the long axis of the fuel dock to the wilderness boundary of Lester Island;
( c ) One motor vessel is launched from a motor vessel that has a permit and only while the authorized motor vessel remains at anchor or operated in accordance with a concession agreement from a permitted motor vessel while that vessel is not underway;
( d ) A commercial fishing vessel authorized under this subpart is actually engaged in commercial fishing; or
( e ) A vessel is granted safe harbor by the superintendent.