alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 73.1 Purpose.

The purpose of these rules is to set forth the policies and procedures that the Department of the Interior, through the National Park Service (NPS), uses to direct and coordinate U.S. participation in the Convention Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage, which was ratified by the Senate on October 26, 1973. The rules describe the procedures used to implement the Convention under the National Historic Preservation Act Amendments of 1980. The purpose of the World Heritage Convention is to enhance worldwide understanding and appreciation of heritage conservation, and to recognize and preserve natural and cultural properties throughout the world that have outstanding universal value to mankind.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Sylvester D. Baldwin, Appellant, *v.*William McAdoo, as Police Commissioner of the City of New York, Respondent.

*People ex rel. Baldwin*v. *McAdoo,*110 App. Div. 432, appeal dismissed.

(Submitted November 26, 1907;

decided December 3, 1907.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered December 8, 1905, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying a motion for a peremptory writ of mandamus to compel the defendant to reinstate the relator in the office of inspector of police in the police department of the city of New York.

*Thomas F. Magner*for appellant.

*Francis K.*Pendleton, *Corporation Counsel (Theodore Connoly*and *Terence Farley*of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal dismissed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Yann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ.
### EXHIBIT 99.1



### Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, William N. Hagler, President and Chief Executive
Officer of Intermountain Refining Co., Inc. certify that:

1. I have reviewed the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of
Intermountain Refining Co., Inc;
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain
any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this quarterly report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly
report.

Date:   July 14, 2006/s/ William N.
HaglerWilliam N.
HaglerPresident and Chief Executive
Officer
#### § 222.23 Confidentiality.

Mediation sessions and dispute resolution communications as defined in 5 U.S.C. 571(5) shall be confidential. Any mediation agreement signed by a Forest Service official and the holder of a term grazing permit is subject to public disclosure.
#### St. Clair Oscar FORDE, Plaintiff, v. URANIA TRANSPORTATION, Inc., Defendant.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

Nov. 18, 1958.

Shatter & Shatter, New York City, for plaintiff.

Hanrahan & Costello, New York City, for defendant.

IRVING R. KAUFMAN, District Judge.

The motions are denied. Plaintiff’s second cause of action under the Jones Act, 46 U.S.C.A. § 688, is enough to-confer jurisdiction in this court by reason of the allegation that the stock of defendant, a Liberian corporation, which owns the M/V Urania, is substantially or entirely owned or controlled by American citizens. See paragraph “Twelfth” of the complaint. Furthermore, in the light of jurisdiction over the second cause of action, this court will take jurisdiction over the first and third causes of action in the exercise of its discretion. A full discussion of the law on the jurisdictional issues is not necessary here, in view of my opinion in Bobolakis v. Compania Panamena Maritima San Gerassimo, S. A. and Transmar Agencies, Inc., D.C. S.D.N.Y., 168 F.Supp. 236, fully discuss*241ing the issues and the law which are equally applicable here.

Defendant’s second motion seeks an order compelling plaintiff to appear for examination in person and upon failure to do so, an order dismissing the complaint. In the light of the facts here such an order would be too drastic. Plaintiff resides and is presently in Barbados. He lacks the finances to journey to New York solely for the oral deposition. Defendant should proceed by written interrogatories and, in addition, if oral examination is necessary, the plaintiff can be made available for such examination one week before the commencement of the trial. See Hyam v. American Export Lines, Inc., 2 Cir., 1954, 213 F.2d 221.

Motions denied. Settle order.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      OF CEO AND** **CFO
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION 906
      OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002** ****




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Searchlight Minerals Corp.
      (the “Company”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Ian R.
      McNeil, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Melvin
      L. Williams ,
      as
      Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that, to the best of his knowledge:




(1) The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




SEARCHLIGHT
                MINERALS CORP.Date:
                August 11, 2008
            
            By:
            /s/
                IAN R. MCNEILIan
                R. McNeilChief
                Executive OfficerDate:
                August 11, 2008
            
            By:
            /s/
                MELVIN L. WILLIAMSMelvin L. WilliamsChief
                Financial Officer
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Margaret Weick, Appellant, *v.*Warden of the City Prison of the City of New York, Respondent.

(Argued February 20, 1907;

decided March 12, 1907.)

*People ex rel. Weick*v. *Warden City Prison,*117 App. Div. 154, affirmed.

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered January *25,*1907, which affirmed an order of Special Term dismissing a writ of habeas corpus and remanding the relator to custody.

*Edward Ilymes*and *Michael Schaap*for appellant.

*Wilbimn Trrners Jerome, District Attorney (Bohert O. Taylor*of counsel), for respondent.

Order affirmed, on opinion of Ingraham, J., below.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Yann, Werner and Chase, JJ. .
INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT

PMN: 15

- 0382

Focus Ready Draft 4/20/2015

ENGINEER: El

- Zoobi \ JAS

SUBMITTER: Itaconix CorpSAT (concerns) (04/14/2015):

Analogs: Related Cases and Misc SAT Info:

Migration to groundwater: Slow

PBT rating: P1B1T1

Health: 1

- 2 Dermal, Inhalation

Eco: 3 Water (All releases to water with a CC = 4 ppb)OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 1

- 2B

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS:

Generated by the 09/30/2013 version of ChemSTEER.INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT

PMN: 15

- 0382

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARYINITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT

PMN: 15

- 0382

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below may coincide

with daily releases from the other sources to the same medium.
#### § 218.141 Effective dates.

Regulations in this subpart are effective from November 9, 2020, through November 8, 2027.
§ 218.16 Effective dates. ( a ) *Effective dates for HFRA-authorized projects.* ( 1 ) Provisions of this part that are applicable to hazardous fuel reduction projects authorized under the HFRA are in effect as of March 27, 2013 for projects where scoping begins on or after this date.
( 2 ) Hazardous fuel reduction project proposals under the HFRA for which public scoping began prior to March 27, 2013 may use the predecisional objection procedures posted at *http://www.fs.fed.us/objections .*
( 3 ) Hazardous fuel reduction project proposals that are re-scoped with the public or re-issued for notice and comment after March 27, 2013 are subject to this part.
( b ) *Effective dates for non-HFRA-authorized projects.* ( 1 ) Project proposals with public scoping completed, but that have not had legal notice published. The applicable provisions of this part are in effect as of March 27, 2013 where public scoping was previously initiated for project proposals, but legal notice of the opportunity to comment has not yet been published; unless scoping or other public notification of the project (e.g. Schedule of Proposed Actions) has clearly indicated the project to be under the former 36 CFR part 215 appeal process.
( 2 ) Project proposals which have legal notice published, but a Decision Notice or Record of Decision has not been signed. If a Decision Notice or Record of Decision is signed within 6 months of March 27, 2013, it will be subject to the 36 CFR part 215 appeal process. If the Decision Notice or Record of Decision is to be signed more than 6 months beyond March 27, 2013, the project proposal will be subject to the requirements of this part. In this case, the responsible official will notify all interested and affected parties who participated during scoping or provided specific written comment regarding the proposed project or activity during the comment period initiated with a legal notice that the project proposal will be subject to the predecisional objection regulations at 36 CFR part 218. All interested and affected parties who provided written comment as defined in § 218.2 during scoping or the comment period will be eligible to participate in the objection process.
( 3 ) Project proposals are subject to the requirements of this part when initial public scoping, re-scoping with the public, or re-issuance of notice and comment begins on or after March 27, 2013.
### Exhibit 31.1

### Certification under Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of

### Rick L. Hurt, Secretary, Treasurer, Director

I, Rick L. Hurt, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of
Intermountain Refining Co., Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I
are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
small business issuer and have:

> Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
> such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
> ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, is made
> known to us by others within the entity, particularly during the period in which
> this report is being prepared;
> Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
> disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
> about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
> of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
> Disclosed in this report any change in the small business
> issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
> small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or
> is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's control
> over financial reporting; and

1. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I
have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the small
business issuer's board of directors:

> All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
> design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
> reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to
> record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
> Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
> or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
> internal control over financial
> reporting.

Date: October 10,
2007/s/ Rick L.
Hurt________Rick L. Hurt, Treasurer, Secretary,
Director
§ 407.4 Procedures for acquiring access to ABMC records pertaining to an individual. The following procedures apply to records that are contained in an ABMC system: ( a ) You may request to be notified if a system of records that you name contains records pertaining to you, and to review any such records, by writing to the Office of the General Counsel (see § 407.3). You also may call the Office of the General Counsel at (703) 696-6902 on business days, between the hours of 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., to schedule an appointment to make such a request in person. A request for records should be presented in writing and should identify specifically the ABMC system(s) involved. Your request to access records pertaining to you will be treated as a request under both the Privacy Act, as implemented by this part, and the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552), as implemented by part 404 of this title (36 CFR 404.1 through 404.10).
( b ) Access to the records, or to any other information pertaining to you that is contained in the system, shall be provided if the identification requirements of § 407.5 are satisfied and the records are determined otherwise to be releasable under the Privacy Act and these regulations. ABMC shall provide you an opportunity to have a copy made of any such records about you. Only one copy of each requested record will be supplied, based on the fee schedule in § 407.8.
( c ) ABMC will comply promptly with requests made in person at scheduled appointments, if the requirements of this section are met and the records sought are immediately available. ABMC will acknowledge, within 10 business days, mailed requests or personal requests for records that are not immediately available, and the information requested will be provided promptly thereafter.
( d ) If you make your request in person at a scheduled appointment, you may, upon your request, be accompanied by a person of your choice to review your records. ABMC may require that you furnish a written statement authorizing discussion of your records in the accompanying person's presence. A record may be disclosed to a representative chosen by you upon your proper written consent.
( e ) Medical or psychological records pertaining to you shall be disclosed to you unless, in the judgment of ABMC, access to such records might have an adverse effect upon you. When such a determination has been made, ABMC may refuse to disclose such information directly to you. ABMC will, however, disclose this information to you through a licensed physician designated by you in writing.
( f ) If you are unsatisfied with an adverse determination on your request to access records pertaining to you, you may appeal that determination using the procedures set forth in § 407.7(a).
Viy-.-6Am--f 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 22-0335

LARRY JAMES LEPPEK,

 Plaintiff and Appellant,

 v.

EVELYN MAE SHUEY,

 Defendant and Appellee.

SECOND ORDER OF MEDIATOR 

APPOINTMENT

This appeal being subject to M.R.App.P. 7, and the parties having failed to jointly 

and timely select a mediator under M.R.App.P., 7(4),(c),

On July 19, 2022, Mathew Stevenson was appointed as Mediator. He has since 

informed this office that he declines the appointment. 

ACCORDINGLY, the appointment of Mr. Stevenson is RESCINDED; and IT IS 

ORDERED THAT Travis B. Dye, whose name appears next on the list of attorneys 

desiring appointment as mediators for Money Judgments appeals which is maintained 

pursuant to M.R.App.P., 7(4)(e), is hereby appointed to conduct the mediation process 

required by M.R.App.P., 7(5), and 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the time periods set forth in M.R.App.P., 

7(5)(d) shall run from the date of this order of appointment.

A true copy of this order is being mailed to counsel of record for the parties, or to 

the parties individually if not represented by counsel, on the date hereof.

DATED this July 25, 2022.

Bowen Greenwood, Clerk of the Supreme Court

c: Larry James Leppek, Michael David Bybee, Travis B. Dye

07/25/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0335
###### Editorial Note on [Subchapter A of Chapter VIII](/current/title-7/chapter-VIII/subchapter-A)

#### Authority:

[7 U.S.C. 71-87K](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/7/71), [1621-1627](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/7/1621).

###### Editorial Note on [Subchapter A of Chapter VIII](/current/title-7/chapter-VIII/subchapter-A)

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at [84 FR 45645](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/84-FR-45645), Aug. 30, 2019.

#### § 810.205 Grades and grade requirements for Two-rowed Malting barley.

| Grade | Minimum limits of— | | | Maximum limits of— | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Test weight per bushel (pounds) | Suitable malting types (percent) | Sound barley1 (percent) | Damaged kernels1 (percent) | Wild oats (percent) | Foreign material (percent) | Other grains (percent) | Skinned and broken kernels (percent) | Thin barley (percent) |
| U.S. No. 1 | 50.0 | 97.0 | 98.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| U.S. No. 2 | 48.0 | 97.0 | 98.0 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 6.0 | 7.0 |
| U.S. No. 3 | 48.0 | 95.0 | 96.0 | 4.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 5.0 | 8.0 | 10.0 |
| U.S. No. 4 | 48.0 | 95.0 | 93.0 | 5.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 5.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 Injured-by-frost kernels and injured-by-mold kernels are not considered damaged kernels or considered against sound barley. | | | | | | | | | |

Note:

Malting barley must not be infested in accordance with [§ 810.107(b)](/on/2024-09-20/title-7/section-810.107#p-810.107(b)) and must not contain any special grades as defined in [§ 810.206](/on/2024-09-20/title-7/section-810.206). Six-rowed Malting barley and Six-rowed Blue Malting barley varieties not meeting the requirements of this section must be graded in accordance with standards established for the class Barley.

[[82 FR 20544](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/82-FR-20544), May 3, 2017]
# WE SAVE YOU MONEY!

1-866-594-3648 www.marsbiomed.com 

# ISO 11143 CERTIFIED 99.9% 

# Amalgam Separator

# PROPER INSTALLATION OF ANY AMALGAM SEPARATOR
Separator Service life 

## PowerLINZ Evacuation Line Cleanser

1 to 3 chairs: Up to 3 yrs. 4 to 9 chairs: Up to 2 yrs. 10+ chairs: Up to 1 yrs.

Although not an exact science, there is information required to give an educated estimate of service life;
1. How many total chairs 2. Number of Doctors 3. Number of Hygienists 4. Practice description (i.e. part time, average, busy)
With this information we will be able to give you an accurate estimate on your LibertyBOSS service life. Everything you need in a line cleaner:

• Concentrated (1 bottle makes 125 liters)

• Cost-Effective

• Easy-to-Use

• Convenient Premeasured Pump

• Non-Corrosive

• Non-Foaming

• Antimicrobial

• Neutral pH

• Chlorine-free

• 100% Biodegradable



# We encourage you to try and find a better guarantee, in writing. • 

### LibertyBOSS separator uses an ion exchange media that traps mercury

• 

### + 99% efficiency tested under actual operating conditions



# The **BOSS** will service 1-3 chairs for up to 3 years, **GUARANTEED.**

No hidden costs No interim service No messy filter changes OUTLET NEW HOSE

ORIGINAL

HOSE CLOSED NIPPLE RESTRICTED

ACCESS INSTALLATION ORIGINAL HOSE PATIENT’S RINSE WASTEWATER

EFFLUENT COUPLER MALE ADAPTER

SOLIDS COLLECTOR

VACUUM

PUMP TO DRAIN Solids collector should be
after the separator NEW HOSE

HOSE CLAMPS HOSE CLAMP HOSE CLAMPS

INLET



## How to Calculate Service Life

Performance Tested: American Dental Association tested at 99.4% (2012) ISO 11143 Certified at 99.9% All evacuation line cleaners that are used with amalgam separators should have a neutral pH. Highly alkaline or acidic cleaners will release mercury and decrease the efficiency of the separator. In time, non-neutral cleaners will also negatively impact your evacuation lines and your vacuum pump system.



## PowerLINZ is fast and effective. Our formulation controls the rapid bacterial build-up inside the suction lines and the amalgam separator.



# FOR MORE INFORMATION CALL: 1-866-594-3648 

# www.marsbiomed.com