alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 13.978 Pets. Possessing a pet is prohibited— ( a ) In the FDA, except in public parking areas, on or immediately adjacent to park roads, or in designated campgrounds;
( b ) Within 150 feet of the park sled dog kennels; and
( c ) Within 150 feet of the park water system intake facilities.
#### In the Matter of the Accounting of Ann Wiley et al., as Executors of George Wiley, Deceased, Respondents. Eliza E. Roxbury, as Administratrix of the Estate of Charles W. Roxbury, Deceased, et al., Appellants; Ann Wiley et al., Respondents.

(Argued February 27, 1907;

decided April 9, 1907.)

*Matter of Wiley,*111 App. Div. 590, reversed.

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered March 9, 1906, which reversed a decree of the New York County Surrogate’s Court judicially settling the accounts of *580the executors herein and directing distribution of the residuary estate.

*Henry A.*Forster, *William H.*Hamilton, *Charles II. Beelcett*and *Warren MoConihe*for appellants.

*Bohert F.*Deyo, for executors, respondents.

*Francis S. Williams*and *Clarence I. Barker*for Ann Wiley et al, respondents.

*Per Curiam.*

We concur in the dissenting opinion of Houghton, J., in the Appellate Division and reverse the judgment below "on the grounds therein stated. We may add that if the construction of the residuary clause adopted by the majority of the Appellate Division were accepted, a question would arise as to the validity of the conditional limitation therein contained as suspending the absolute ownership of personal property and the vesting of real estate during a period not terminable on lives. *(Henderson v.*Henderson, 113 N. Y. 1.) Suspension of the power of alienation is not the only factor in our rule against perpetuities. In *Oxley*v. *Lame*(35 N. Y. 340), cited by the Appellate Division, it was substantially conceded that if the whole estate was to be divided solely among those who survived to the period of distribution the provision was invalid (p. 349). Such is the construction of the will adopted by the Appellate Division in this case. In *Matter of Denton*(137 N. Y. 428) the several parts of the residuary estate indefensibly vested either at the death of the testator or at the termination of one life in being thereafter or of two lives in being thereafter and .thus in no way contravened the statute.

The judgment of the Appellate Division should be reversed and the decree of the surrogate affirmed, with costs to appellants in both courts, payable out of the estate, on the dissenting opinion of Houghton, J., below.

Cullen, Ch. J., Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Yann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Hiscock, JJ., concur.

Judgment accordingly.
§ 1192.79 Floors, steps and thresholds. ( a ) Floor surfaces on aisles, step treads, places for standees, and areas where wheelchair and mobility aid users are to be accommodated shall be slip-resistant.
( b ) All thresholds and step edges shall have a band of color(s) running the full width of the step or threshold which contrasts from the step tread and riser or adjacent floor, either light-on-dark or dark-on-light.
# EUR-Lex - 12006E266 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12006E266

**Treaty establishing the European Community (consolidated version) - Part Five - Institutions of the Community - TITLE I - Provisions governing the institutions - Chapter 5 - The European Investment Bank - Article 266 **

*
Official Journal C 321 E , 29/12/2006 P. 0162 - 0162 Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0139 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0286 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0070 - Consolidated version *

Article 266

The European Investment Bank shall have legal personality.

The members of the European Investment Bank shall be the Member States.

The Statute of the European Investment Bank is laid down in a Protocol annexed to this Treaty. The Council acting unanimously, at the request of the European Investment Bank and after consulting the European Parliament and the Commission, or at the request of the Commission and after consulting the European Parliament and the European Investment Bank, may amend Articles 4, 11 and 12 and Article 18(5) of the Statute of the Bank.

--------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 99.1


                            MAVERICK TUBE CORPORATION

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with  the  Annual  Report  of  Maverick  Tube  Corporation  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-K for the fiscal  year ended  December  31, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Gregg Eisenberg, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/ Gregg Eisenberg
------------------------
Gregg Eisenberg
Chief Executive Officer

March 28, 2003

This  certification  is made solely for purposes of 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, and
not for any other purpose.
# EUR-Lex - 12006E192 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12006E192

**Treaty establishing the European Community (consolidated version) - Part Five - Institutions of the Community - TITLE I - Provisions governing the institutions - Chapter 1 - The institutions - Section 1 - The European Parliament - Article 192 **

*
Official Journal C 321 E , 29/12/2006 P. 0132 - 0132 Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0115 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0261 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0056 - Consolidated version *

Article 192

In so far as provided in this Treaty, the European Parliament shall participate in the process leading up to the adoption of Community acts by exercising its powers under the procedures laid down in Articles 251 and 252 and by giving its assent or delivering advisory opinions.

The European Parliament may, acting by a majority of its Members, request the Commission to submit any appropriate proposal on matters on which it considers that a Community act is required for the purpose of implementing this Treaty.

--------------------------------------------------
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-41158 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus SERGIO ANTONIO LASTRA-RIVERA, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-98-CR-256-1

- - - - - - - - - - June 16, 1999 Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Sergio Antonio Lastra-Rivera has moved to withdraw and filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). LastraRivera has received a copy of counsel’s motion and brief but has not filed a response. Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED. Counsel is excused fromNo. -2- further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
Order entered July 17, 2018

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 18 - 00804 - CV IN RE F.A. BROWN'S C ONSTRUCTION, LLC, D/ B/A BROWN CONSTRUCTI ON AND

BROWN'S CONCRETE CON STRUC TION, Relator O rigina l Proceeding from the 134th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC - 13 - 09249



### O RDER Before the Court is relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. We request that the real party in interest and the respon dent file their responses, if any, to the petition for writ of mandamus by July 31, 2018.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
UNITED ST A TES ENVIRONMENT AL PROTECTION AGENCY WAS HINGTON , D.C. 20460 

### JAN 2 0 

### 2016

OFFICE OF CHEMICAL SAFETY AND POLLUTION PREVENTION 

### MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: 

### FROM: THRU: 

### TO: BEAD ' s Responses to Comments from Dow AgroSciences on Use and Usage Information in the U .S. EPA's Penoxsulam Registration Review Docket EPA-HQ-OPP-2015 - 0303 , DP #431000 /().. . . I Cynthia Doucoure, Environmental Protection Specialist L**~** Science Information and Analysis Branch Biological and Economic Analysis Division (7503P) Diann Sims, Chief

# Af**1.,,. ,Jr~**  

# tf'- "lJ.

# 4i~ Science Information and Analysis Branch Biological and Economic Analysis Division (7503P) Bonnie Adler, Chemical Review Manager Risk Management and Implementation Branch V Pesticide Re-evaluat ion Division (7508P) Through this memo, BEAD is responding to comments from Dow AgroSciences (DAS) on use and usage information in the U.S. EPA ' s Penoxsulam Registration Review Docket EPA-HQOPP-2015-0303. DAS comments and BEAD ' s responses follow below. 

### DAS Comment on the Registration Review Ecological Risk Assessment for Penoxsulam - page 4 of 35: A summary of the screening level estimates of agricultural uses of penoxsulam is presented in Table 2 which includesplums / prunes as crops. This entry should be deleted since penoxsulam is not currently re gistered in plums or prunes. 

### BEAD Response: Thanks for calling our attention to the fact that penoxsulam is not registered for use on, what we assume are " bearing " plums /prunes. We found, however, that penoxsularn is registered for use on " nonbearing " fruit trees including plums and fresh prune (62719-612). We will note that plums/prunes are " nonbearing" in our screening level estimates of agricultural uses.
Page 1 of2DAS Specific Comment on the Agency's BEAD Review Document, page 3 of 10: It is also formulated as soluble concentrate /liquid, and ready to use (RTU). The statement should be corrected to read: It is also formulated as soluble concentrate /liquid and for turfonly as a ready to use (RTU) product. BEAD Response: Thanks for clarifying that the penoxsulam ready to use (RTU) product is used on turf only. It is duly noted. This concludes DAS comments for BEAD and BEAD's responses. Please let us know ifthere are further comments or questions regarding use or usage information for penoxsulam.
Sources: A. Ratnayake, S. Haddad, S. Smearman. 201 4 . BEAD Chemica l Profile for Registration Review: Penoxsulam (119031). Office of Pesticide Programs, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency BEAD (Biological and Economic Analysis Division). 2014. Penoxsulam Screening Level Usage Analysis. BEAD , Office of Pesticide Programs, US .Environmental Protection Agency.

Page 2 of2
§ 1260.42 How does the NDC process referrals of Federal Records? ( a ) All referrals are processed through the IRC.
( b ) Agencies will have one year from the time they receive formal notification of referrals by the NDC to review their equity in the records. If an agency does not complete its review within one year of formal notification, its information will be automatically declassified in accordance with section 3.3(d)(3)(B) of the Order unless the information has been properly exempted by an equity holding agency under section 3.3 of the Order.
( c ) Once notified, the agencies will coordinate their review with the NDC so the NDC can properly manage the workflow of the IRC.
# EUR-Lex - 12005SPN07/02 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12005SPN07/02

**Protocol concerning the conditions and arrangements for admission of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania to the European Union - Annex VII:List referred to in Article 20 of the Protocol: transitional measures, Romania - 2.Freedom to provide services **

*
Official Journal L 157 , 21/06/2005 P. 0141 - 0142 *

2. FREEDOM TO PROVIDE SERVICES

31997 L 0009: Directive 97/9/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 March 1997 on investor-compensation schemes (OJ L 84, 26.3.1997, p. 22).

By way of derogation from Article 4(1) of Directive 97/9/EC, the minimum level of compensation shall not apply in Romania until 31 December 2011. Romania shall ensure that its investor‐compensation scheme provides for cover of not less than EUR 4500 from 1 January 2007 until 31 December 2007, of not less than EUR 7000 from 1 January 2008 until 31 December 2008, of not less than EUR 9000 from 1 January 2009 until 31 December 2009, of not less than EUR 11000 from 1 January 2010 until 31 December 2010 and of not less than EUR 15000 from 1 January 2011 until 31 December 2011.

During the transitional period the other Member States will retain the right to prevent a branch of a Romanian investment firm established on their territories from operating unless and until such a branch has joined an officially recognised investor-compensation scheme within the territory of the Member State concerned in order to cover the difference between the Romanian level of compensation and the minimum level referred to in Article 4(1) of Directive 97/9/EC.

--------------------------------------------------
### MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04

- 10

- 00 897

- CR

IN RE Juan Carlos DIAZ
Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM
Sitting: Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice Steven C. Hilbig, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: January 12, 2011

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED
On December 20, 2010, relator Juan Carlos Diaz filed a petition for writ of mandamus.
The court has considered relator’s petition and is of the opinion that relator is not entitled to the
relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is D ENIED. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 52.8(a).
Additionally, relator filed an Application for Leave to File Petition for Writ of
Mandamus. No leave is required to file a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. T EX

. R.

A PP

. P . 52. Therefore, relator’s moti on for leave to file is DENIED as moot.

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2009

- CR

- 9555 , styled State of Te xas v. Juan Carlos Diaz , pending in the 187t h Judicial District Court , Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Raymond Angelini presiding.
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Canuto Jason Tarango, * From the 70th District Court

of Ector County,

Trial Court No. A-45,242

Vs. No. 11-16-00109-CR * May 25, 2017

The State of Texas, * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

(Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is error 

in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, we modify 

the judgment of the trial court to delete the restitution of $180, and we dismiss the 

appeal.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 5413 

To amend the Justice for United States Victims of State Sponsored Terrorism 

Act to provide rules for payments to Havlish Settling Judgment Creditors. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 3, 2024 

Mr. FETTERMAN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Justice for United States Victims of State 

Sponsored Terrorism Act to provide rules for payments 

to Havlish Settling Judgment Creditors. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. JUSTICE FOR UNITED STATES VICTIMS OF 

4 STATE SPONSORED TERRORISM. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Justice for United States 

6 Victims of State Sponsored Terrorism Act (34 U.S.C. 

7 20144) is amended— 

8 (1) in subsection (e)(2)(B), by adding at the 

9 end the following: 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 5413 IS

1 ‘‘(vi) EXCEPTION FOR THE HAVLISH

2 SETTLING JUDGMENT CREDITORS.— 

3 ‘‘(I) IN GENERAL.—This sub4 section does not apply with respect 

5 to— 

6 ‘‘(aa) a Havlish Settling 

7 Judgment Creditor who pre8 viously elected to participate in 

9 the Fund in accordance with 

10 clause (iii) or who submitted an 

11 application for conditional pay12 ment in accordance with clause 

13 (iv); or 

14 ‘‘(bb) the assets, or the net 

15 proceeds of the sale of properties 

16 or related assets, attributable to 

17 a person described in item (aa). 

18 ‘‘(II) RELEASE OF FUNDS HELD

19 IN ESCROW.—All funds allocated to a 

20 Havlish Settling Judgment Creditor 

21 and withheld from distribution under 

22 clause (iv) shall be released and paid 

23 to the Havlish Settling Judgment 

24 Creditor to whom such withheld funds 

25 had been allocated. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•S 5413 IS

1 ‘‘(III) FUTURE PAYMENT ELIGI2 BILITY.—Each Havlish Settling Judg3 ment Creditor shall be entitled to par4 ticipate in future rounds of payments 

5 in the same manner as all other 

6 claimants described in paragraphs 

7 (10) through (14) of subsection (j), ir8 respective of any application for con9 ditional payment submitted under 

10 clause (iv).’’; and 

11 (2) in subsection (j), by adding at the end the 

12 following: 

13 ‘‘(17) HAVLISH SETTLING JUDGMENT CRED14 ITOR.—The term ‘Havlish Settling Judgment Cred15 itor’ means a plaintiff, an estate or successor in in16 terest thereof, who— 

17 ‘‘(A) has an eligible claim under subsection 

18 (c) that arises out of the September 11, 2001, 

19 terrorist attacks against the United States; and 

20 ‘‘(B) is a Settling Judgment Creditor iden21 tified in the Order dated April 16, 2014, in the 

22 proceedings captioned In re 650 Fifth Avenue 

23 and Related Properties, No. 08–CV–10934 

24 (S.D.N.Y.).’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
4 

•S 5413 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 subsection (a) shall take effect as if enacted on December 

3 29, 2022. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 3, 2019

No. 04-19-00414-CR

IN RE Raymond DEBA

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

On June 19, 2019, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. This court concludes we 

do not have jurisdiction to grant relator relief; therefore, the petition for writ of mandamus is 

DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). 

It is so ORDERED on July 3, 2019.

_____________________________

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 3rd day of July, 2019.

_____________________________

Keith E. Hottle, Clerk of Court

 1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2005CR0956 & 2005CR0716, styled The State of Texas v. Raymond Deba, 

pending in the County Court at Law No. 2, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Kevin M. O’Connell presiding.
§ 84.40 What conditions must I follow to accept Federal grant money? ( a ) The audit requirements for State and local governments (43 CFR part 12), and
( b ) The uniform administrative requirements for grants and cooperative agreements with State and local governments (43 CFR part 12).
#### § 1254.84 How may I use a debit card for copiers in the Washington, DC, area?

Your research identification card can be used as a debit card if you arrange with the Cashier's Office to set up an account using cash, check, money order, debit card, or credit card. Your researcher identification card number as encoded on the card forms the basis of your account in the debit system. You may also purchase generic debit cards of values up to $20 each from the Cashier's Office using any of the above payment methods. When the Cashier's Office is closed or at any other time during the hours research rooms are open as cited in part 1253 of this chapter, you may use cash or credit card to purchase a debit card from the vending machines located in the research rooms. Inserting the debit card into a card reader connected to the copier enables you to make copies for the appropriate fee, which are found in § 1258.12 of this chapter. You can add value to your card using the vending machine in the research room or at the Cashier's Office. We do not make refunds.

[75 FR 10415, Mar. 8, 2010]
### SERVED: October 10, 2014 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF JOSEPH MARIDON, SR. DOCKETNO. FAA 2014-0116 (Civil Penalty Action)

AMENDED PROCEDURAL ORDER We do not anticipate reaching this case priorto January 2015. Unless specifically changedherein all prior orders remain in effect. WHEREFORE, the parties be and are hereby ORDERED to adhere to the following procedural schedule: 1. On orbefore January 9, 2015, the parties shall conclude all discovery including, butnot limitedto, depositions, document production, responses to production requests and/or interrogatories. Ifthe parties cannotresolve a discovery dispute they shall submitthe dispute to the undersigned for resolution in atimely manner; 2. Theparties shall be preparedto present this case at ahearing on or after January 9, 2015, subjectto the availability ofcourtroom facilities. The specific date and time for the hearing will be forthcoming in a separate Order.

Richard C. Goodwin U.S. Administrative Law Judge Attachment

- Service List . j
.SERVICE LIST -BYU.S. MAIL ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 WilburWrightBuilding-Suite 2W1000 1
Joseph Maridon, Sr., Respondent 9212 E. Frederick Ave Spokane, W A 99206-4303 ONE COPY

Joseph R. Maridon, Jr., Respondent's Counsel Attorney at Law 6130 Elton Ave Las Vegas, NV 89107 Naomi Tsuda, Complainant's Counsel Office ofthe Regional Counsel, AWP-7 Federal Aviation Administration Western-Pacific Region, P.O. Box 92007 Los Angeles, CA 90009-2007 TEL: 310-725-7100 FAX: 310-725-6816 The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin,Administrative LawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536 DocketNo. FAA-2014-0116 (Civil PenaltyAction)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 2