Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 176 / Friday, September 11, 2015 / Notices 54787 

DATES: Additional comments may be 

submitted on or before October 13, 

2015. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

referencing Docket ID Number EPA– 

HQ–OECA–2014–0031, to: (1) EPA 

online using www.regulations.gov (our 

preferred method), or by email to 

docket.oeca@epa.gov, or by mail to: EPA 

Docket Center, Environmental 

Protection Agency, Mail Code 28221T, 

1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., 

Washington, DC 20460; and (2) OMB via 

email to oira_submission@omb.eop.gov. 

Address comments to OMB Desk Officer 

for EPA. 

EPA’s policy is that all comments 

received will be included in the public 

docket without change including any 

personal information provided, unless 

the comment includes profanity, threats, 

information claimed to be Confidential 

Business Information (CBI), or other 

information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Patrick Yellin, Monitoring, Assistance, 

and Media Programs Division, Office of 

Compliance, Mail Code 2227A, 

Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 

Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, 

DC 20460; telephone number: (202) 

564–2970; fax number: (202) 564–0050; 

email address: yellin.patrick@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Supporting documents which explain 

in detail the information that the EPA 

will be collecting are available in the 

public docket for this ICR. The docket 

can be viewed online at 

www.regulations.gov or in person at the 

EPA Docket Center, WJC West, Room 

3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW., 

Washington, DC. The telephone number 

for the Docket Center is 202–566–1744. 

For additional information about EPA’s 

public docket, visit: http://

www.epa.gov/dockets. 

Abstract: The affected entities are 

subject to the General Provisions of the 

NSPS (40 CFR part 60, subpart A) and 

any changes, or additions, to the 

Provisions are specified at 40 CFR part 

60, subpart JJJ. Owners or operators of 

the affected facilities must make an 

initial notification, performance tests, 

and maintain records of the initial and 

repeat performance test. 

Form Numbers: None. 

Respondents/affected entities: 

Petroleum dry cleaners. 

Respondent’s obligation to respond: 

Mandatory (40 CFR part 60, subpart JJJ). 

Estimated number of respondents: 20 

(total). 

Frequency of response: Initially. 

Total estimated burden: 1,850 hours 

(per year). Burden is defined at 5 CFR 

1320.3(b). 

Total estimated cost: $186,000 (per 

year), including $0 for annualized 

capital/startup and/or operation & 

maintenance costs. 

Changes in the Estimates: In addition, 

we have updated all calculations using 

the latest labor rates, which results in an 

adjustment increase in total labor costs. 

Courtney Kerwin, 

Acting Director, Collection Strategies 

Division. 

[FR Doc. 2015–22901 Filed 9–10–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[EPA–HQ–OECA–2014–0071; FRL–9933– 

70–OEI] 

Information Collection Request 

Submitted to OMB for Review and 

Approval; Comment Request; NESHAP 

for Publicly Owned Treatment Works 

(Renewal) 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency has submitted an information 

collection request (ICR), ‘‘NESHAP for 

Publicly Owned Treatment Works (40 

CFR part 63, subpart VVV) (Renewal)’’ 

(EPA ICR No. 1891.07, OMB Control No. 

2060–0428), to the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) for 

review and approval in accordance with 

the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 

3501 et seq.). This is a proposed 

extension of the ICR, which is currently 

approved through September 30, 2015. 

Public comments were previously 

requested via the Federal Register (79 

FR 30117) on May 27, 2014 during a 60- 

day comment period. This notice allows 

for an additional 30 days for public 

comments. A fuller description of the 

ICR is given below, including its 

estimated burden and cost to the public. 

An Agency may neither conduct nor 

sponsor, and a person is not required to 

respond to, a collection of information 

unless it displays a currently valid OMB 

control number. 

DATES: Additional comments may be 

submitted on or before October 13, 

2015. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

referencing Docket ID Number EPA– 

HQ–OECA–2014–0071, to (1) EPA 

online using www.regulations.gov (our 

preferred method), or by email to 

docket.oeca@epa.gov, or by mail to: EPA 

Docket Center, Environmental 

Protection Agency, Mail Code 28221T, 

1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., 

Washington, DC 20460; and (2) OMB via 

email to oira_submission@omb.eop.gov. 

Address comments to OMB Desk Officer 

for EPA. 

EPA’s policy is that all comments 

received will be included in the public 

docket without change including any 

personal information provided, unless 

the comment includes profanity, threats, 

information claimed to be Confidential 

Business Information (CBI), or other 

information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Patrick Yellin, Monitoring, Assistance, 

and Media Programs Division, Office of 

Compliance, Mail Code 2227A, 

Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 

Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, 

DC 20460; telephone number: (202) 

564–2970; fax number: (202) 564–0050; 

email address: yellin.patrick@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Supporting documents which explain in 

detail the information that the EPA will 

be collecting are available in the public 

docket for this ICR. The docket can be 

viewed online at www.regulations.gov 

or in person at the EPA Docket Center, 

WJC West, Room 3334, 1301 

Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, 

DC. The telephone number for the 

Docket Center is (202) 566–1744. For 

additional information about EPA’s 

public docket, visit: www.epa.gov/

dockets. 

Abstract: The affected entities are 

subject to the General Provisions of the 

NESHAP (40 CFR part 63, subpart A), 

and any changes or additions to the 

Provisions are specified at 40 CFR part 

63, subpart VVV. Owners or operators of 

the affected facilities must submit initial 

notification reports, performance tests, 

and periodic reports and results. 

Owners or operators are also required to 

maintain records of the occurrence and 

duration of any startup, shutdown, or 

malfunction in the operation of an 

affected facility, or any period during 

which the monitoring system is 

inoperative. Reports, at a minimum, are 

required semiannually. 

Form Numbers: None. 

Respondents/affected entities: 

Owners and operators of publicly 

owned treatment works. 

Respondent’s obligation to respond: 

Mandatory (40 CFR part 63, subpart 

VVV). 

Estimated number of respondents: 6 

(total). 

Frequency of response: Initially, 

occasionally, and semiannually. 


rmajette on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
54788 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 176 / Friday, September 11, 2015 / Notices 

1PM2.5 refers to particulate matter less than or 

equal to 2.5 microns in diameter. 

Total estimated burden: 17 hours (per 

year). Burden is defined at 5 CFR 

1320.3(b). 

Total estimated cost: $1,730 (per 

year), including no annualized capital/ 

startup and/or operation & maintenance 

costs. 

Changes in the Estimates: There is an 

increase in the respondent burden from 

the most recently approved ICR. This 

increase is not due to any program 

changes. EPA revised the burden 

calculations to assume that all 

respondents incur a rule familiarization 

burden annually. Previously, EPA 

assumed that only new sources would 

incur this burden. This change resulted 

in the burden increase in this ICR. 

Courtney Kerwin, 

Acting-Director, Collection Strategies 

Division. 

[FR Doc. 2015–22902 Filed 9–10–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[EPA–R08–OAR–2015–0450; FRL–9933–91– 

Region 8] 

Adequacy Determination for the Cache 

County PM2.5 Attainment Plan’s Motor 

Vehicle Emissions Budgets for 

Transportation Conformity Purposes; 

State of Utah 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice of adequacy. 

SUMMARY: In this notice, the 

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

is notifying the public that the EPA has 

found the following adequate for 

transportation conformity purposes: The 

Cache County, Logan, UT–ID PM2.5

Attainment Plan, Utah State 

Implementation Plan Section IX. Part 

A.23 and its motor vehicle emissions 

budgets (MVEB). As more fully 

explained in the Supplementary 

Information section of this notice, this 

finding will affect future transportation 

conformity determinations. 

DATES: This finding is effective on 

September 28, 2015. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tim 

Russ, Air Program, Mailcode 8P–AR, 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 8, 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, 

Colorado 80202–1129, telephone 

number (303) 312–6479, fax number 

(303) 312–6064, or email russ.tim@

epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Throughout this document, whenever 

‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our,’’ are used, we mean 

the EPA. Whenever ‘‘State’’ is used, we 

mean the State of Utah. 

Transportation conformity is required 

by section 176(c) of the Clean Air Act 

(CAA). The conformity rule provisions 

at 40 CFR 93 require that transportation 

plans, programs, and projects conform 

to a State Implementation Plan (SIP) and 

establish the criteria and procedures for 

determining whether or not they do. 

Conformity to a SIP means that 

transportation activities will not 

produce new air quality violations, 

worsen existing violations, or delay 

timely attainment of the National 

Ambient Air Quality Standard. 

The criteria by which we determine 

whether a SIP revision’s MVEBs are 

adequate for conformity purposes are 

outlined in 40 CFR 93.118(e)(4), which 

was promulgated August 15, 1997 (62 

FR 43780). We described our process for 

determining the adequacy of submitted 

SIP MVEBs in our July 1, 2004 

Transportation Conformity Rule 

Amendments (69 FR 40004). We used 

these resources in making our adequacy 

determinations announced in this 

notice. 

This notice is simply an 

announcement of findings that we have 

already made and are as described 

below: 

The Governor submitted the Cache 

County, Logan, UT–ID PM2.5 Attainment 

Plan, Utah SIP Section IX. Part A.23 1 to 

EPA on December 16, 2014. The State 

prepared the SIP revision submittal to 

meet the requirements of Part D of Title 

I of the CAA for PM2.5 attainment plans, 

subparts 1 and 4 for ‘‘moderate’’ areas. 

As part of our adequacy review, we 

posted the Cache County, Logan, UT–ID 

PM2.5 Attainment Plan, Utah SIP Section 

IX. Part A.23, with its identified MVEBs, 

for adequacy review on EPA’s 

transportation conformity Web site on 

March 23, 2015 (see: http://

www.epa.gov/otaq/stateresources/

transconf/currsips.htm). We requested 

public comments by April 22, 2015. We 

did not receive any comments. The EPA 

sent a letter to the Utah Division of Air 

Quality on June 17, 2015, stating that 

the submitted Cache County, Logan, 

UT–ID PM2.5 Attainment Plan, Utah SIP 

Section IX. Part A.23 and its MVEBs 

were adequate for transportation 

conformity purposes. 

For the Cache County, Logan, UT–ID 

PM2.5 Attainment Plan, Utah SIP Section 

IX. Part A.23, the MVEBs we found 

adequate were 0.32 tons per day (tpd) 

for PM2.5, 4.49 tpd for nitrogen oxides, 

and 3.23 tpd for volatile organic 

compounds. Following the effective 

date listed in the DATES section of this 

notice, the Cache County Metropolitan 

Planning Organization, the Utah 

Department of Transportation, and the 

U.S. Department of Transportation are 

required to use these MVEBs for future 

transportation conformity 

determinations for projects in the Cache 

County, Logan, UT–ID PM2.5

nonattainment area. 

Please note that our adequacy review 

of the MVEBs as described above is 

separate from our future rulemaking 

action on the Cache County, Logan, UT– 

ID PM2.5 Attainment Plan, Utah SIP 

Section IX. Part A.23 revision discussed 

above and should not be used to 

prejudge our ultimate approval or 

disapproval of that SIP revision. Even if 

we find the Cache County, Logan, UT– 

ID PM2.5 Attainment Plan and its 

MVEBs adequate for transportation 

conformity purposes now, we may later 

find it necessary to disapprove the SIP 

revision. Should this situation arise, we 

would then revisit our adequacy 

finding. 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Dated: August 26, 2015. 

Shaun L. McGrath, 

Regional Administrator, Region 8. 

[FR Doc. 2015–22942 Filed 9–10–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION 

[Docket No. 15–08] 

General Motors LLC v. Nippon Yusen 

Kabushiki Kaisa; Wallenius 

Wilhelmsen Logistics As; Eukor Car 

Carriers Inc. 

Notice of Filing of Complaint and 

Assignment 

Notice is given that a complaint has 

been filed with the Federal Maritime 

Commission (Commission) by General 

Motors LLC, hereinafter ‘‘Complainant,’’ 

against Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha 

(‘‘NYK Japan’’), Wallenius Wilhemsen 

Logistics AS (‘‘WWL Norway’’), and 

EUKOR Car Carriers Inc. (‘‘EUKOR’’), 

hereinafter ‘‘Respondents.’’ 

Complainant states it is a Delaware 

limited liability company and ‘‘one of 

the world’s largest automobile original 

equipment manufacturers.’’ 

Complainant alleges that Respondent 

NYK Japan is a Japanese company that 

ships vehicles ‘‘into and out of the 

United States.’’ Complainant alleges that 

Respondent WWL Norway is a 

Norwegian company that provides 

‘‘Vehicle Carrier Services for shipments 

to and from the United States.’’ 

Complainant alleges that Respondent 


rmajette on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES