alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EUR-Lex - 12008E223 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008E223

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - PART SIX: INSTITUTIONAL AND FINANCIAL PROVISIONS - TITLE I: INSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS - Chapter 1: The institutions - Section 1: The European Parliament - Article 223 (ex Article 190(4) and (5) TEC) **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0149 - 0149 *

Article 223

(ex Article 190(4) and (5) TEC)

1. The European Parliament shall draw up a proposal to lay down the provisions necessary for the election of its Members by direct universal suffrage in accordance with a uniform procedure in all Member States or in accordance with principles common to all Member States.

The Council, acting unanimously in accordance with a special legislative procedure and after obtaining the consent of the European Parliament, which shall act by a majority of its component Members, shall lay down the necessary provisions. These provisions shall enter into force following their approval by the Member States in accordance with their respective constitutional requirements.

2. The European Parliament, acting by means of regulations on its own initiative in accordance with a special legislative procedure after seeking an opinion from the Commission and with the approval of the Council, shall lay down the regulations and general conditions governing the performance of the duties of its Members. All rules or conditions relating to the taxation of Members or former Members shall require unanimity within the Council.

--------------------------------------------------
§ 13.400 Purpose and policy. ( a ) Consistent with the management of fish and wildlife in accordance with recognized scientific principles and the purposes for which each park area was established, designated, or expanded by ANILCA, the purpose of this subpart is to provide the opportunity for local rural residents engaged in a subsistence way of life to do so pursuant to applicable State and Federal law.
( b ) Consistent with sound management principles, and the conservation of healthy populations of fish and wildlife, the utilization of park areas is to cause the least adverse impact possible on local rural residents who depend upon subsistence uses of the resources of the public lands in Alaska.
( c ) Nonwasteful subsistence uses of fish, wildlife and other renewable resources by local rural residents shall be the priority consumptive uses of such resources over any other consumptive uses permitted within park areas pursuant to applicable State and Federal law.
( d ) Whenever it is necessary to restrict the taking of a fish or wildlife population within a park area for subsistence uses in order to assure the continued viability of such population or to continue subsistence uses of such population, the population shall be allocated among local rural residents engaged in subsistence uses in accordance with a subsistence priority system based on the following criteria: ( 1 ) Customary and direct dependence upon the resource as the mainstay of one's livelihood;
( 2 ) Local residency; and
( 3 ) Availability of alternative resources.
( e ) Nothing in this subpart shall be construed as permitting a level of subsistence use of fish and wildlife within park areas to be inconsistent with the conservation of healthy populations, and within a national park or monument to be inconsistent with the conservation of natural and healthy populations, of fish and wildlife.
[71 FR 69333, Nov. 30, 2006, as amended at 80 FR 64344, Oct. 23, 2015]
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

           Certification of Chief Executive Officer of XTO Energy Inc.
           (Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
                 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)


In connection with the Annual Report of XTO Energy Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Bob R. Simpson, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

BOB R. SIMPSON
--------------------------
Bob R. Simpson
Chief Executive Officer
March 31, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to XTO Energy Inc. and will be retained by XTO Energy Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# u p t-/ K-*T

_---v ' "Y

^

January. 201 1 

## SlO-l10113-00 8 •mRTMENTO F 'i>!S-ORWIO N i: TOPERATiOM S :0! ! JA N 

### 1 3 P 3 : Lf2
Th e Honorabl e Ra yLaHoo d Secretary U.S
. Departmen t o fTransportatio n 120 0 Ne wJerse yAvenue , S.E
. Washington , D.C
. 2059 0 Re : Continuatio n o fAlasl< a Airlines ' Essentia l Ai rServic e a tCordova
. Gustavus
. Petersbuna
. Wrangell
. an d Yakutat
. Alaska
. Docke tOST-1998-489 9 - 7 Dea rSecretar yLaHood : Thi s lette ri s t o expres s stron g suppor tfo rth e selectio n o fAlask a Airline s t o continu e t o provid e essentia l ai rservic e t o ou rcommunity
. Alaska' s curren t patter n o fservic e - usin g je taircraf t- meet s crucia l need s tha twoul d b e difficult , i fno t impossible , t o mee twit h an yothe rtyp e o fservic e o raircraf ttype : Alaska' s servic e connect s Southeas tAlask a passenger s t o on e o rmor e majo r communitie s o finterest , wit h single-plan e servic e t o Anchorage , Juneau , Ketchika n o r Seattle
. Fro m thes e hubs , ou rcommunit yca n acces s th e airline' s extensiv e rout e syste m an d benefi t fro m it s marketin g relationship s wit h othe rearners . Th e 737-40 0 combinatio n ('combi" ) passenge ran d carg o aircraft , whic h Alask a Airline s propose s t o continu e usin g o n thi s route , provide s freight , mai l an d carg o capacit ytha ta non-je t carrie rsimpl ycanno t provide
. Further , th e 737-40 0 comb i aircraf ti s equippe d wit h Require d Navigatio n Performanc e Technolog yprecisio n technology , whic h enable s th e airlin e t o reliabl yacces s th e airpor tdurin g inclemen tweather , thu s reducin g diversion s andcancellatk>n s and , i n turn , enablin g peopl e an d product s t o dependabl yreac h th e community
. I n sum , Alaska' s je tservic e i s critica l t o th e economi cwel l bein g o fou r community
. Fo rthes e reasons , w e respectfull yurg e DO Tt o selec tAlask a Airline s t o continu e t o provid e essentia l ai rservic e t o Southeas tAlaska , a s th e airlin e ha s successfull ydon e fo r mor e tha n thirt yyears . Furthermore , a t Alask a Commercia l w e receiv e ou rproduc e an d othe rfoo d item s weekl y fro m Seattl e t o serv e th e communit yan d kee p ou rgrocer ystor e wel l stocked
. Also , I personall yow n a B& B i n Cordov a an d 99 % o fou rguest s an d th e touris tt o Cordov a com e vi a Alask a Airline s an d an ydisruptio n i n servic e woul d pu tth e econom y o fCordov a int o a tailspin
. Sincerely , Denni s Ros e Branc h Manage r Alask a Commercia l Co
.

## 3-00 8

Denni s Ros e Owne r Salmo n BearyIn n Cordov a AK
.

cc : Susa n Kurland , Assistan tSecretar yfo rAviatio n an d Internationa l Affair s Denni s DeVany , Chief , EA S an d Domesti cAnalysi s Th e Honorabl e Sea n Pamell , Governor , Stat e o fAlask a Mar cA
. Lulken , Commissioner , Alask a Stat e Departmen to fTransportatio n an d Publi cFacilitie s
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

          - [File No. 500-1] 

It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of Pretory USA, Inc. (n/k/a Sunrise Petroleum Resources, Inc.) because it has not filed any periodic reports since it filed an amended Form 10-SB on February 18, 2000. 

The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the securities of the above-listed company. 

Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the above-listed company is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. EDT on October 5, 2006, through 11:59 p.m. EDT on October 18, 2006. 

By the Commission. 

Jill M. Peterson, 

Assistant Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 06-8597 Filed 10-5-06; 11:50 am] 

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
#### § 213.2 Authority for Chief, Forest Service, to group, define, and name national grasslands.

The Chief, Forest Service, is authorized to group the national grasslands into administrative units, define, change or modify their boundaries, and to provide such specific designations therefor as he finds necessary and desirable for effective and economical administration thereof and for public and official reference thereto.

[33 FR 12370, Sept. 4, 1968]
§ 1002.2 Wildlife protection. ( a ) The following are prohibited: ( 1 ) The taking of wildlife.
( 2 ) The feeding, touching, teasing, frightening or intentional disturbing of wildlife nesting, breeding or other activities.
( 3 ) Possessing unlawfully taken wildlife or portions thereof.
( b ) *Hunting and trapping.* Hunting and trapping are prohibited within the area administered by the Presidio Trust.
( c ) The Board may establish conditions and procedures for transporting lawfully taken wildlife through the area administered by the Presidio Trust. Violation of these conditions and procedures is prohibited.
( d ) The Board may designate all or portions of the area administered by the Presidio Trust as closed to the viewing of wildlife with an artificial light. Use of an artificial light for purposes of viewing wildlife in closed areas is prohibited.
( e ) The regulations contained in this section apply, regardless of land ownership, on all lands and waters within the boundaries of the area administered by the Presidio Trust that are under the legislative jurisdiction of the United States.
- Transmittal Letter from Judiciary
- Page 2
- Page 3
- Page 4
- Page 5
- Page 6
- Page 7
- Page 8
- Page 9
- Page 10
Total U.S. Exports to  Turks, Caicos Isls.

Data in Thousand Dollars 

Data For  JUN. 1999

|Group                 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | Year to Date 6/1998 | Year to Date 6/1999 | % Change | Year Ending 6/1998 | Year Ending 6/1999 | % Change | % Share
|--------------------- | ---- | ---- | ---- | ---- | ------------------- | ------------------- | -------- | ------------------ | ------------------ | -------- | -------
|TEXTILES & APPAREL    | 546  | 188  | 297  | 324  | 170                 | 96                  | -43.59   | 340                | 250                | -26.46   | 0      
|TOTAL APPAREL         | 144  | 68   | 89   | 133  | 96                  | 72                  | -24.9    | 153                | 109                | -28.65   | 0      
|TEXTILE MILL PRODUCTS | 403  | 120  | 207  | 191  | 74                  | 24                  | -68      | 186                | 140                | -24.65   | 0      
|Made-Up Arts          | 322  | 96   | 151  | 169  | 53                  | 24                  | -55.17   | 132                | 140                | 6.29     | 0.01
#### ADOLPH HATJIE v. WILLIAM HARE.

January Term, 1896.

*Malicious prosecution. Malice must be proved. No evidence tending to show.*

1. In an action for malicious prosecution, the plaintiff must allege and prove, as an independent fact, malice in the defendant.

2. *Held*that the evidence in this case did not tend to establish such fact.

Action on the case for malicious prosecution. Plea, the general issue. Trial by jury at the September term, 1896, Chittenden county, Taft, J., presiding. At the close of the evidence the court directed a verdict for the defendant. The plaintiff excepts.

The evidence of the plaintiff tended to show that the defendant had brought suit against him for the conversion of a basket which he claimed that the plaintiff had unlawfully taken from his store; that the defendant testified in that •suit that he had seen the plaintiff take the basket and that he ■could not be mistaken; that subsequently one Lesser was produced as a witness upon that trial, and testified that he had taken the basket which he brought into the court; that the defendant recognized the basket as his own upon seeing *248jt, but still insisted that the plaintiff was guilty of its conversion.

*A. V. Spaulding*for the plaintiff.

The question of malice was for the jury, and there was evidence tending to show it. *Rogers*v. *Judd,*6 Vt. 191; *Jones*v. Booth, 10 Vt. 268; *Wemet*v. *Missisquoi Lime*Co., 46 Vt. 458. '

*Seneca Haselton*and *Charles T. Barney*for the defendant.

There was no proof of malice in the defendant. *Bar ron*v. *Mason,*31 Vt. 189; *Carléton*v. *Baylor,*50 Vt. 220.

THOMPSON, J.

This is an action on the case for malicious prosecution. To maintain it, it was incumbent upon the plaintiff to allege and prove as an independent fact, malice on the part of the defendant in bringing his action against the plaintiff. Dishonesty and bad faith on the part of the defendant must be established. Therefore the question whether there was malice in the mind of the defendant in the institution of his suit, was a distinct issue on trial, to be proven by the plaintiff. *Barron*v. *Mason,*31 Vt. 189; *Driggs*v. *Burton,*44 Vt. 124; *Carleton*v. *Taylor,*50 Vt. 220. The plaintiff’s evidence did not tend to prove such malice, and the county court, therefore, did not err in directing a verdict for the defendant at the close of the plaintiff’s evidence.

*Judgment affirmed.*
# EUR-Lex - 12004V235 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V235

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART III — THE POLICIES AND FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - TITLE III — INTERNAL POLICIES AND ACTION - CHAPTER III — POLICIES IN OTHER AREAS - Section 6 — Consumer protection - Article III-235 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0105 - 0105 *

Article III-235

1. In order to promote the interests of consumers and to ensure a high level of consumer protection, the Union shall contribute to protecting the health, safety and economic interests of consumers, as well as to promoting their right to information, education and to organise themselves in order to safeguard their interests.

2. The Union shall contribute to the attainment of the objectives referred to in paragraph 1 through:

(a) measures adopted pursuant to Article III-172 in the context of the establishment and functioning of the internal market;

(b) measures which support, supplement and monitor the policy pursued by the Member States.

3. European laws or framework laws shall establish the measures referred to in paragraph 2(b). Such laws shall be adopted after consultation of the Economic and Social Committee.

4. Acts adopted pursuant to paragraph 3 shall not prevent any Member State from maintaining or introducing more stringent protective provisions. Such provisions must be compatible with the Constitution. They shall be notified to the Commission.

--------------------------------------------------
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 102 (Tuesday, May 28, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31898-31899]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-12575]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION

Notice of Second Prehearing Conference; Update

AGENCY: U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission.

[[Page 31899]]

    In the Matter of Baby Matters, LLC, CPSC Docket No. 13-1.
    Federal Register Citation of Previous Announcement:
    Vol. 78, No. 93, Tuesday, May 14, 2013, page 29205.
    Announced Time and Date of Second Prehearing Conference: Thursday, 
May 23, 2013, 11:00 a.m. Eastern.
    The prehearing conference scheduled for May 23, 2013 will be 
continued to a later date, if necessary.

Contact Person For Additional Information: Regina Maye, Paralegal 
Specialist, U.S. Coast Guard ALJ Program, (212) 825-1230.

    Dated: May 22, 2013.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-12575 Filed 5-24-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Judicial Conference of the United States

# AGENCY:

Judicial Conference of the United States, Advisory Committee on Rules of Evidence.

# ACTION:

Notice of open meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

The Advisory Committee on Rules of Evidence will hold a one-day meeting. The meeting will be open to public observation but not participation.

# DATES:

November 16, 2006.

*Time:*                         8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

# ADDRESSES:

Thurgood Marshall Federal Judiciary Building, Mecham Conference Center, One Columbus Circle, NE., Washington, DC.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

John K. Rabiej, Chief, Rules Committee Support Office, Administrative Office of the United States Courts, Washington, DC 20544, telephone (202) 502-1820.

Dated: September 22, 2006.

John K. Rabiej,

Chief, Rules Committee Support Office.

[FR Doc. 06-8385 Filed 9-29-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 2210-55-M
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

Nos. 98-40158 and 98-40275 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ANTONIO L. ABRON, Defendant-Appellant,

**************************************************************** ANTONIO L. ABRON, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC Nos. 9:97-CV-157 and

9:97-CV-428

- - - - - - - - - - December 15, 1998 Before JOLLY, SMITH, and WIENER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *Nos. 98-40158 and 98-40275 -2- Antonio L. Abron, federal prisoner # 08715-035, appeals from the district court’s denial of his motion for leave to extend time to file original 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence (No. 98-40158) and the district court’s denial of 28 U.S.C. § 2241 construed as motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (No. 98-40275). He argues in both appeals that the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA) has infringed upon his right to petition the government, his counsel was ineffective, and the district court abused its discretion in enhancing his sentence for obstruction of justice. We sua sponte consolidate the appeals pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 3(b). Abron offers no argument in his brief to challenge the district court’s denial of his motion for an extension of time to file his § 2255 motion. Issues which are not briefed are waived. Brinkmann v. Dallas County Deputy Sheriff Abner , 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987). According, the appeal in No. 98-40158 is DISMISSED. Because Abron filed the § 2255 motion after April 24, 1996, the effective date of the AEDPA, he must obtain a certificate of appealability (COA), before proceeding with this appeal. Green v. Johnson , 116 F.3d 1115, 1119-20 (5th Cir. 1997). A COA may be issued only if Abron has made a “substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the issue is nonconstitutional, like the limitations question in this case, this court applies a two-step analysis to determine whether to issue a COA. First, the court determines whether theNos. 98-40158 and 98-40275 -3- movant has made a credible showing of error. Only if that question is answered in the affirmative will the court consider whether the movant’s underlying claim satisfies the COA standard. Murphy v. Johnson , 110 F.3d 10, 11 (5th Cir. 1997) (28 U.S.C. § 2254 case). Abron has not made a credible showing that the district court erred in dismissing his § 2255 motion. His request for COA to proceed in No. 98-40275 is DENIED. Abron’s request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) is DENIED. No. 98-40158 DISMISSED; No. 98-40275 COA DENIED; IFP DENIED.