alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47 .5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
For the Fifth Circuit

No. 95-10916

MAXUS ENERGY CORP.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court For the Northern District of Texas, Dallas

(3:92-CV-1655-X)

August 8, 1996

Before REYNALDO G. GARZA, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

In this Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation,

and Liability Act (“CERCLA”) case, 42 U.S.C. § 9601, et seq .,

Plaintiff/Appellant Maxus Energy Corporation (“Maxus”) seeks torecover response co sts and obtain contribution from the United

States for expenses incurred by Maxus in the clean-up of a

hazardous waste site.

Section § 9613(f)(1) of CERCLA states that “[a]ny person may

seek contribution from any other person who is liable or

potentially liable under § 9607(a) of this title....” 42 U.S.C. §

9613(f)(1). Section 9607(a) provides that, to establish a prima

facie case of liability, a plaintiff must prove, inter alia , that

the defendant i s a “responsible party” under CERCLA. J oslyn Mfg.

Co. v. Koppers Co. , 40 F.3d 750, 760 (5th Cir. 1994). “To be

liable as a responsible party under CERCLA, [a party] must fall

into one of the categories set out in

... 42 U.S.C. § 9607(a).”

Id. Section 9607(a) imposes liability upon four categories of

responsible people:

(1) the owner and operator of a ... facility,

(2) any person who at the time of disposal of any hazardous substance owned or operated any facility at which such hazardous substances were disposed of,

(3) any person who by contract, agreement, or
otherwise arranged for disposal or treatment,

or arranged with a transporter for transport
for disposal or treatment, of hazardous substances owned or possessed by such person, by any other party or entity, at any facility

or incineration vessel owned or operated by
another party or entity and containing such hazardous substances, and

(4) an y person who accepts or accepted any
hazardous substances for transport to disposal or treatment facilities, incineration vessels

or sites sele cted by such person, from which
there is a relea se, or a threatened release3 which causes the incurrence of response
costs....

42 U.S.C. § 9607(a)(emphasis added).4

g:\95-10916.opn Maxus argues that the United States is liable as both an “operator”

under § 9607(a)(1), and a s an “arranger” under § 9607(a)(3).

We have caref ully reviewed the briefs, the record excerpts,

the reply brief, and relevant portions of the record itself. For

the reasons stated by the district court in its Memorandum Opinion

and Order filed September 1, 1995, which granted the motion for a

summary judgment of defendant, United States, the final judgment

entered by the district court on September 1, 1995, is AFFIRMED.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 552 

To extend duty-free treatment provided with respect to imports from Haiti 

under the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery Act. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 28, 2023 

Mr. RUBIO (for himself, Mr. WARNOCK, Mr. CASSIDY, and Mr. DURBIN) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend duty-free treatment provided with respect to imports from Haiti under the Caribbean Basin Economic 

Recovery Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Haiti Economic Lift 

5 Program Extension Act of 2023’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 552 IS

1 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF SPECIAL RULES FOR HAITI UNDER 

2 CARIBBEAN BASIN ECONOMIC RECOVERY 

3 ACT. 

4 Section 213A of the Caribbean Basin Economic Re5 covery Act (19 U.S.C. 2703a) is amended— 

6 (1) in subsection (b)— 

7 (A) in paragraph (1)— 

8 (i) by amending subparagraph 

9 (B)(v)(I) to read as follows: 

10 ‘‘(I) APPLICABLE PERCENT11 AGE.—The term ‘applicable percent12 age’ means 60 percent or more during 

13 the period beginning on December 20, 

14 2017, and ending on September 30, 

15 2035.’’; and 

16 (ii) by amending subparagraph (C) to 

17 read as follows: 

18 ‘‘(C) QUANTITATIVE LIMITATIONS.—The 

19 preferential treatment described in subpara20 graph (A) shall be extended, during each period 

21 after the initial applicable 1-year period, to not 

22 more than 1.25 percent of the aggregate square 

23 meter equivalents of all apparel articles im24 ported into the United States in the most re25 cent 12-month period for which data are avail26 able.’’; and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 552 IS

1 (B) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘in each 

2 of the 16 succeeding 1-year periods’’ each place 

3 it appears and inserting ‘‘in any of the suc4 ceeding 1-year periods’’; and 

5 (2) by amending subsection (h) to read as fol6 lows: 

7 ‘‘(h) TERMINATION.—The duty-free treatment pro8 vided under this section shall remain in effect until Sep9 tember 30, 2035.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Schweizerische Eidgenossenschaft 

Confederation suisse 

Confederazione Svizzera 

Confederaziun svizra 

FOCA CH-3003 Bern 

By Fax and Mail 

Me. Paul Gretch 

Director. Office for International Aviation 

Federal Department of the Environment, Transport, Energy and 

Communications DETEC 

Federal Office of Civil Aviation FOCA 

Aviation Policy and Strategy 

Office of the Assistant Secretary for Aviation and 

International Affairs 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

400 7th Street. SW .. Room 6402 

Washington. DC 20590 

USA 

Reference: 0/01/01-02.02.187 

Your reference: 

Our reference: fjl 

Contact person: Laurence Fontana Jungo 

Tel. +41 3 1 3230410, Fax +41313259212, laurence.fontana-jungo@bazl.admin.ch 

Ittigen, 26 February 2010 

Declaration of Reciprocity 

Dear Mr. Gretch 

The Federal Office of Civil Aviation of Switzerland herewith declares. that it will consider applications 

by U.S. air carriers for approval to operate charters to and from Switzerland in accordance with the 

provisions of the Air Transport Agreement between the Government of Switzerland and the Government of the United States of America. dated 15 June 1995. and. for those charters not specified in the 

Annex to the Agreement. on the basis of com ity and reciprocity. 

Yours sincerely 

Vf·."'~H'?' Marcel Zuckschwerdt 

Director 

Head Aviation Policy and Strategy 

~1-Y- Laurence Fontana Jungo 

Chief Negotiator Air Services Agreements 

Legal and International Affairs 

Federal Office of Civil Aviation 

MUhleslrasse 3, 3063 Itligen 

Postal address: CH-3003 Bern 

Tel. +41 31 32580 39/40, Fax +41 31 325 80 32 

VfWW.aviation.admin.ch
**Exhibit 99.5**

 

**Consent of Independent Registered CharteredAccountants**

 

We consent to theincorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-161320 on Form F-10,Registration Statement No. 333-162944 on Form F-3 and RegistrationStatement No.’s 333-125486, 333-121629, 333-115750, 333-110964 and 333-103562on Form S-8 and to the use of our reports dated February 25, 2010relating to the consolidated financial statements of TELUS Corporation (whichreport expresses an unqualified opinion and includes a separate report titledComments by Independent Registered Chartered Accountants on Canada-UnitedStates of America Reporting Difference, relating to changes in accountingprinciples), and the effectiveness of TELUS Corporation’s internal controlsover financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 40-F ofTELUS Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2009.

 
| /s/ Deloitte &  Touche LLP           |   |
|-----------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                          |   |
| Independent Registered  Chartered Accountants |   |
| Vancouver, Canada                             |   |
| March 12, 2010                                |   |

 

----
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 5427 

To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to prohibit Federal funding 

for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 4, 2024 

Mr. KENNEDY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to prohibit Federal funding for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No Propaganda Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON FEDERAL FUNDS FOR CORPORA6 TION FOR PUBLIC BROADCASTING. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 396 of the Communica8 tions Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 396) is amended by adding 

9 at the end the following: 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 5427 IS

1 ‘‘(m) PROHIBITION ON FEDERAL FUNDS.—No Fed2 eral funds may be made available to the Corporation on 

3 or after the date of enactment of the No Propaganda 

4 Act.’’. 

5 (b) CORPORATION PROHIBITED FROM ACCEPTING

6 FEDERAL FUNDS.—Section 396(g) of the Communica7 tions Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 396(g)) is amended— 

8 (1) in paragraph (2)(A), by inserting ‘‘subject 

9 to paragraph (3)(C),’’ before ‘‘obtain’’; and 

10 (2) in paragraph (3)— 

11 (A) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘; 

12 and’’ and inserting a semicolon; 

13 (B) in subparagraph (B), by striking the 

14 period at the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

15 (C) by adding at the end the following: 

16 ‘‘(C) accepting funds from the Federal Govern17 ment on or after the date of enactment of the No 

18 Propaganda Act.’’. 

19 (c) RESCISSION.—Any unobligated balances of 

20 amounts made available under the heading ‘‘Corporation 

21 for Public Broadcasting’’ in the Consolidated Appropria22 tions Act, 2022 (Public Law 117–103; 136 Stat. 489), 

23 the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023 (Public Law 

24 117–328; 136 Stat. 4901), or the Further Consolidated 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•S 5427 IS

1 Appropriations Act, 2024 (Public Law 118–47; 138 Stat. 

2 696) are rescinded. 

3 (d) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 

4 396(k)(3)(A)(iv)(II) of the Communications Act of 1934 

5 (47 U.S.C. 396(k)(3)(A)(iv)(II)) is amended by inserting 

6 ‘‘before the date of enactment of the No Propaganda Act’’ 

7 after ‘‘amounts received’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
#### § 1915.1052 Methylene chloride.

Note:

The requirements applicable to shipyard employment under this section are identical to those set forth at [29 CFR 1910.1052](/on/2024-09-23/title-29/section-1910.1052).

[[62 FR 1619](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/62-FR-1619), Jan. 10, 1997]
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-88,593-02

EX P ARTE CHRISTO P HER CALVIN, Appli cant

ON AP P LICATION FOR AWRIT OF MANDAM US CAUSE NO. 17CR-125 IN THE 349TH DIS TRICT COURT F ROM HOUSTON COUNTY

Per curiam . OP INION On Oct. 30, 2019, this Court order ed Respondent, the District Clerk of Houston County , to state whether Christopher Calvin had filed an application for a writ of habea s corpus on August 19, 2019, in cause number 17CR0125. On May 18, 2023, this Court rec eived a re s p o n s e from the District Clerk in which she stated that she had rec eived an Article 11.07 application from Applicant in 2019 but she returne d it to him, along with a blank Article 11.07 form. We condit ionally grant relief

. A district cler

k has a minist eria l duty under Art. 1 1

. 0 7 o f th e Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e to rec eive, file, and timely forwa rd to this Court applications for writs of habea s corpus. Benson v. D ist. Cl erk, M

ontgomery Cty., 331 S.W .3d 431, 432 (Tex. Crim. App. 2011).We conditionally grant Relator' s application for a writ of mandamus and direc t the Houston

County District Clerk to acc ept and file Relator' s habea s application and to forwa rd it to this Court under Article 11.07. Fol l o wi ng custom, we will withhold issuance of the writ and allow the District Clerk an opportunity to confor

m her actio n s t o th i s opinion. Only if she ref uses to file Relator' s habea s application will the writ of mandamus issue. State ex rel. Hill v. Pirtle, 887 S.W .2d 921, 932 (Tex. Crim. App. 1994). Relator shall file any supplemental information or habea s applications within 30 day s of the issuance of

this opini on. Deliver ed: J une 21, 2023 Do not publish
**Exhibit
      23.2**





**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**


We
          consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement
          Nos. 333-10815, 333-10817, 333-28267, 333-28269, 333-39590, 333-57653,
          333-105866 and 333-134998 on Form S-8 of our report dated March 5, 2007,
          relating to the financial statements of RCC Minnesota, Inc. (“RCCM”) (which
          report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph
          related to the preparation of such financial statements from the separate
          records of Rural Cellular Corporation and the allocations to and from RCCM),
          appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Rural Cellular Corporation
          for
          the year ended December 31, 2006.
 
 
 /s/
          Deloitte & Touche LLP
 
 Minneapolis,
          Minnesota
 March
          5,
          2007
4 

I 

rm-y.r-r^ 

FEi: "'viON 

BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION ' ' • i 

?0i7 J/y 27 Mi (0: 02 

In the Matter of ) 

) MUR6920 

American Conservative Union; Now or ) 

Never PAC and James C. Thomas III in ) CELA 

his official capacity as Treasurer; ) 

Unknown Respondent ) 

CERTIFICATION 

I, Dayna C. Brown, recording secretary for the Federal Election Commission executive 

session on Januaiy 24,2017, do hereby certify that the Commission decided by a vote of.6,-0 to: 

1. Find reason to believe that American Conservative Union violated 52 U.S.C. § 

30122. • 

2. Find reason to believe that Unknown Respondent violated 52 U.S.C. § 30122. 

3. Take no action at this time as to Now or Never PAC and James C. Thomas III in 

his official capacity as treasurer. 

4. Approve the Factual and Legal Analysis as circulated by the Office of General 

Counsel on December 7,2016 at 2:21 P.M. and amended by the Office of 

Commissioner Goodman on January 23, 2017 at 9:08 P.M. 

5. Approve the use of compulsory process as necessary. 

6. Approve the appropriate letters. 

Commissioners Goodman, Hunter, Petersen, Ravel, Walther, and Weintraub voted 

affirmatively for the decision. 

Attest: 

(^)ate Dayna C. Brown 

Acting Secretary and Clerk of the Commission
#### § 13.1126 Bicycles.

Use of a bicycle is prohibited on the Forest Loop, Bartlett River and Bartlett Lake trails.
# EUR-Lex - 12005SP036 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12005SP036

**Protocol concerning the conditions and arrangements for admission of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania to the European Union - PART FOUR:TEMPORARY PROVISIONS - TITLE IV:OTHER PROVISIONS - Article 36 **

*
Official Journal L 157 , 21/06/2005 P. 0040 - 0040 *

Article 36

1. If, until the end of a period of up to three years after accession, difficulties arise which are serious and liable to persist in any sector of the economy or which could bring about serious deterioration in the economic situation of a given area, Bulgaria or Romania may apply for authorisation to take protective measures in order to rectify the situation and adjust the sector concerned to the economy of the internal market.

In the same circumstances, any present Member State may apply for authorisation to take protective measures with regard to Bulgaria, Romania, or both those States.

2. Upon request by the State concerned, the Commission shall, by emergency procedure, adopt the European regulations or decisions establishing the protective measures which it considers necessary, specifying the conditions and modalities under which they are to be put into effect.

In the event of serious economic difficulties and at the express request of the Member State concerned, the Commission shall act within five working days of the receipt of the request accompanied by the relevant background information. The measures thus decided on shall be applicable forthwith, shall take account of the interest of all parties concerned and shall not entail frontier controls.

3. The measures authorised under paragraph 2 may involve derogations from the rules of the Constitution and in particular from this Protocol to such an extent and for such periods as are strictly necessary in order to attain the objectives referred to in paragraph 1. Priority shall be given to such measures as will least disturb the functioning of the internal market.

--------------------------------------------------
Editorial Note on Part 622
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 622 appear at 79 FR 57837, Sept. 26, 2014 and at 81 FR 32253, May 23, 2016.

§ 622.25 Exemptions for Gulf groundfish trawling. Gulf groundfish trawling means fishing in the Gulf EEZ by a vessel that uses a bottom trawl, the unsorted catch of which is ground up for animal feed or industrial products. ( a ) Other provisions of this part notwithstanding, the owner or operator of a vessel trawling for Gulf groundfish is exempt from the following requirements and limitations for the vessel's unsorted catch of Gulf reef fish: ( 1 ) The requirement for a valid commercial vessel permit for Gulf reef fish in order to sell Gulf reef fish.
( 2 ) Minimum size limits for Gulf reef fish.
( 3 ) Bag limits for Gulf reef fish.
( 4 ) The prohibition on sale of Gulf reef fish after a quota or ACL closure.
( b ) Other provisions of this part notwithstanding, a dealer in a Gulf state is exempt from the requirement for a Gulf and South Atlantic dealer permit to receive Gulf reef fish harvested from the Gulf EEZ by a vessel trawling for Gulf groundfish.
[79 FR 19494, Apr. 9, 2014]
II 

Calendar No. 137 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 534 

[Report No. 118–63] 

To withdraw certain Bureau of Land Management land from mineral 

development. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 27, 2023 

Mr. HEINRICH (for himself and Mr. LUJA ́N) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

JULY 19, 2023 

Reported by Mr. MANCHIN, without amendment 

A BILL 

To withdraw certain Bureau of Land Management land from 

mineral development. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Buffalo Tract Protec5 tion Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 534 RS

1 SEC. 2. WITHDRAWAL. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subject to valid existing rights, 

3 the Federal land described in subsection (b) is withdrawn 

4 from all forms of— 

5 (1) location, entry, and patent under the mining 

6 laws; and 

7 (2) disposition under the mineral leasing, min8 eral materials, and geothermal leasing laws. 

9 (b) DESCRIPTION.—The Federal land referred to in 

10 subsections (a) and (c) is the approximately 4,288 acres 

11 of land administered by the Director of the Bureau of 

12 Land Management and generally depicted as ‘‘Tract A’’, 

13 ‘‘Tract B’’, ‘‘Tract C’’, and ‘‘Tract D’’ on the map entitled 

14 ‘‘Placitas, New Mexico Area Map’’ and dated November 

15 13, 2019. 

16 (c) SURFACE ESTATE.— 

17 (1) IN GENERAL.—Subject to the reservation of 

18 the mineral estate under paragraph (2), nothing in 

19 this Act prohibits the Secretary of the Interior from 

20 conveying the surface estate of the Federal land de21 scribed in subsection (b) in accordance with— 

22 (A) the Federal Land Policy and Manage23 ment Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.); or 

24 (B) the Act of June 14, 1926 (commonly 

25 known as the ‘‘Recreation and Public Purposes 

26 Act’’) (43 U.S.C. 869 et seq.). 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 534 RS

1 (2) MINERAL ESTATE.—Any conveyance of the 

2 surface estate of the Federal land described in sub3 section (b) shall require a reservation of the mineral 

4 estate to the United States. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 137 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 534 

[Report No. 118–63] 

A BILL 

To withdraw certain Bureau of Land Management 

land from mineral development. 

JULY 19, 2023 

Reported without amendment 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
# EUR-Lex - 12007P023 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12007P023

**Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - TITLE III - EQUALITY - Article 23 - Equality between women and men **

*
Official Journal 303 , 14/12/2007 P. 0007 - 0007 *

Article 23

Equality between women and men

Equality between women and men must be ensured in all areas, including employment, work and pay.

The principle of equality shall not prevent the maintenance or adoption of measures providing for specific advantages in favour of the under-represented sex.

--------------------------------------------------