alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
(Chief Financial Officer) CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER I, Mark J. Flaherty, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Tandy Brands
Accessories, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have:  a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report
our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc.
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):  a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; andb.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting. Date: September 23, 2004
    
    /s/ Mark J. Flaherty
Mark J. Flaherty
Chief Financial Officer
Case 16-26796 Doc 42 Filed 09/22/17 Entered 09/22/17 09:40:36 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 9
Case 16-26796 Doc 42 Filed 09/22/17 Entered 09/22/17 09:40:36 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 9
Case 16-26796 Doc 42 Filed 09/22/17 Entered 09/22/17 09:40:36 Desc Main

Document Page 3 of 9
Case 16-26796 Doc 42 Filed 09/22/17 Entered 09/22/17 09:40:36 Desc Main

Document Page 4 of 9
Case 16-26796 Doc 42 Filed 09/22/17 Entered 09/22/17 09:40:36 Desc Main

Document Page 5 of 9
Case 16-26796 Doc 42 Filed 09/22/17 Entered 09/22/17 09:40:36 Desc Main

Document Page 6 of 9
Case 16-26796 Doc 42 Filed 09/22/17 Entered 09/22/17 09:40:36 Desc Main

Document Page 7 of 9
Case 16-26796 Doc 42 Filed 09/22/17 Entered 09/22/17 09:40:36 Desc Main

Document Page 8 of 9
Case 16-26796 Doc 42 Filed 09/22/17 Entered 09/22/17 09:40:36 Desc Main

Document Page 9 of 9
#### George H. Neidlinger, Respondent, *v.*The Onward Construction Company, Appellant.

(Argued March 13, 1907;

decided April 2, 1907.)

*Neidlinger*v. *Onward Constr. Co.,*107 App. Div. 398, affirmed.

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate.Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered *573May 8,1906, affirming a judgment in favor of. plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court at a Trial Term without a jury in an action to recover on contracts for labor and materials alleged to have been furnished.

*Ernest*Hall, *John G.*Fisher, *Hira/m li. Fisher*and *Albert H Gleason*for appellant.

*Franlc Harvey Fields R. Percy Chittenden*and *Walter Lester Glenney*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Yann, Werner, Hiscock and Chase, JJ. Not sitting: Willard Bartlett, J.
May 29, 2015 

Mr. Jeff Hester 

7244 Camino Degrazia #279 

San Diego, CA 92111 

Dear Mr. Hester: 

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It 

explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days. 

Why We Can Not Process Your Request 

We entered your April 28, 2015, exemption request on behalf into the public docket 

(No. FAA-2015-1286), but we are unable to process your request any further. The 

information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For 

us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following: 

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief 

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole. 

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption. 

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request. 

What You Should Do 

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 
2 

If We Do Not Hear From You 

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Brenda Robeson 

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division 

Enclosure
# EUR-Lex - 12004V444 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V444

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART IV — GENERAL AND FINAL PROVISIONS - Article IV-444 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0190 - 0190 *

Article IV-444

Simplified revision procedure

1. Where Part III provides for the Council to act by unanimity in a given area or case, the European Council may adopt a European decision authorising the Council to act by a qualified majority in that area or in that case.

This paragraph shall not apply to decisions with military implications or those in the area of defence.

2. Where Part III provides for European laws and framework laws to be adopted by the Council in accordance with a special legislative procedure, the European Council may adopt a European decision allowing for the adoption of such European laws or framework laws in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure.

3. Any initiative taken by the European Council on the basis of paragraphs 1 or 2 shall be notified to the national Parliaments. If a national Parliament makes known its opposition within six months of the date of such notification, the European decision referred to in paragraphs 1 or 2 shall not be adopted. In the absence of opposition, the European Council may adopt the decision.

For the adoption of the European decisions referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2, the European Council shall act by unanimity after obtaining the consent of the European Parliament, which shall be given by a majority of its component members.

--------------------------------------------------
National Brick Research Center 100 Clemson Research Blvd. Anderson, SC 29625 (864)656-1094 www. brickandtile. org Chloride Determination Report Client: Morin Brick Date: 9/9/02 Date Tests Completed: 9/9/02

Sample ID % Chlorides 1 1 Fired <0.01 2 1 Dry <0.01 3 4 Fired <0.01 4 4 D ry <0. 01 'Method of Analysis: SISE

, Ji 'Frederic. Associate Director
Case 16-28373 Doc 4 Filed 09/02/16 Entered 09/02/16 14:51:18 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2
Case 16-28373 Doc 4 Filed 09/02/16 Entered 09/02/16 14:51:18 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32

Certificate Pursuant to

             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
             as Adopted Pursuant to
        Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NetWolves Corporation (the "Company")
on Form  10-QSB  for the  quarter  ending  March  31,  2004 as  filed  with  the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Walter
M.  Groteke,  President,  Chief  Executive  Officer  and  Chairman of the Board,
certify,  pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  906  of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date: May 17, 2004

                                        /s/Walter M. Groteke
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Walter M. Groteke
                                        Chairman of the Board, President
                                        and Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>



Certificate Pursuant to

             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
             as Adopted Pursuant to
        Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NetWolves Corporation (the "Company")
on Form  10-QSB  for the  quarter  ending  March  31,  2004 as  filed  with  the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Peter
C. Castle, Secretary and Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


Date: May 17, 2003

                                        /s/ Peter C. Castle
                                        ---------------------------------------
                                        Peter C. Castle
                                        Secretary and Treasurer
                                        Chief Financial Officer and
                                        Chief Accounting Officer
# EUR-Lex - 12007L/AFI/DCL/25 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12007L/AFI/DCL/25

**Treaty of Lisbon amending the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Community, signed at Lisbon, 13 December 2007 - A. Declarations concerning provisions of the Treaties - 25. Declaration on Articles 61 H and 188 K of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union **

*
Official Journal 306 , 17/12/2007 P. 0258 - 0258 *

25. Declaration on Articles 61 H and 188 K of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

The Conference recalls that the respect for fundamental rights and freedoms implies, in particular, that proper attention is given to the protection and observance of the due process rights of the individuals or entities concerned. For this purpose and in order to guarantee a thorough judicial review of decisions subjecting an individual or entity to restrictive measures, such decisions must be based on clear and distinct criteria. These criteria should be tailored to the specifics of each restrictive measure.

--------------------------------------------------
[Crim. No. 569.

First Appellate District.

April 30, 1915.]

#### THE PEOPLE, Respondent, v. CHARLES MACK, Appellant.

Criminal Law—Assault With Intent to Commit Murder—Instructions.—In this prosecution for the crime of assault with intent to commit murder it is held that no error appears in the record in refusing to give certain requested instructions.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a new trial. William P. Lawlor, Judge.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

F. J. Murphy, and Henry J. Tardy, for Appellant.

U. S. Webb, Attorney-General, John H. Riordan, Deputy Attorney-General, and Frank L. Guerena, Deputy Attorney-General, for Respondent.

THE COURT.

This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction of the defendant upon a charge of assault with intent to commit murder and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.

The appellant having presented no request for the transcription of the evidence taken in the trial court, and no such transcription having been made or filed in this court, the case comes before us upon the judgment-roll alone.

The appellant relies upon certain alleged errors of the trial court in refusing to give certain requested instructions. As to some of these, an inspection of the entire body of instructions given by the court discloses that the substance of these *297rejected instructions is embodied in other instructions which the court gave, and in which the susbtantial rights of the defendant are as fully preserved as they would have been if his requested instructions had been given. As to certain other of the defendant’s requested instructions, they embody references to the evidence, and that not having been presented upon this appeal we are unable to say whether there was any such evidence as would have entitled the defendant to have the instructions given.

We find no error in this case upon the face of the record.

The judgment and order are affirmed.
1 The Honorable Linda R. Reade, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Iowa. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 03-4037

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the v. * Northern District of Iowa. * Robert Wade, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: April 4, 2005 Filed: April 8, 2005

___________ Before SMITH, McMILLIAN, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Robert Wade appeals the district court’s 1 denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion. As the court correctly concluded, Wade’s sentence is not affected by Amendment 591 to the Sentencing Guidelines. We therefore affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. Wade’s appellate motion is denied as moot.

______________________________
Case 16-28515 Doc 15 Filed 09/23/16 Entered 09/27/16 08:12:15 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
#### § 13.168 Shared use.

In any permit authorizing the construction of a cabin or other structure necessary to reasonably accommodate authorized subsistence uses, the Superintendent shall provide for shared use of the facility by the permittee and other local rural residents rather than for exclusive use by the permittee.
§ 1212.400 What are my responsibilities as a(n) NARA awarding official? As a(n) NARA awarding official, you must obtain each recipient's agreement, as a condition of the award, to comply with the requirements in— ( a ) Subpart B of this part, if the recipient is not an individual; or
( b ) Subpart C of this part, if the recipient is an individual.
**Exhibit
21**


**SUBSIDIARIES
      OF THE REGISTRANT**
    **PLACE
      OF INCORPORATION**Maverick
      Tube, L.P.
    DelawareMaverick
      Investment LLC
    DelawareMaverick
      GP LLC
    DelawareMaverick
      C&P, Inc.
    DelawareMaverick
      Tube International Holdings, Inc.
    DelawareMaverick
      Tube Canada ULC
    Nova
      ScotiaMaverick
      Tube Canada GP Ltd.
    AlbertaMaverick
      Tube Canada LP
    AlbertaPrudential
      Steel Holdings ULC
    Nova
      ScotiaMaverick
      Exchangeco (Nova Scotia) ULC
    Nova
      ScotiaMaverick
      Tube (Canada) Inc.
    AlbertaPrudential
      Steel Ltd.
    AlbertaPrecision
      Tube Holding LLC
    DelawarePrecision
      Tube Technology L.P.
    TexasPrecision
      GP, LLC
    DelawarePrecision
      Tube Canada Limited
    AlbertaPrecision
      Tube Technology Limited UK
    ScotlandSEAC
      Acquisition LLC
    TexasSeaCAT
      L.P.
    Texas
J~,SED

a^' STqr~ A s~Q . UNITEDSTATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTIONAGENCY WASHINGTON, D

.C. 20460 = ~~~r'9t PROj~G1,1 

### 0 

## JUL 3 0 2010 OFFICE OF AIRANDRADIATION The Honorable Mark Begich United States Senate Washington, D

.C. 20515 Dear Senator Begich: Thank you for your letter of July 8, 2010, to Administrator Jackson regarding our recent Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPR) on Lead Emissions From Piston-Engine Aircraft Using Leaded Aviation Gasoline. TheAdministrator has asked that I respond to your letter. I want to assure you that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) recognizes the value of piston-engine general aviation in Alaska. Any EPAaction to require piston-engine aircraft to be able to operate safely and effectively on unleaded aviation gasoline in the future will involve a thorough process of identifying options and will consider economic and other impacts. This would be done in concert with the U .S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), states, industry groups and user groups. If we decide to act, the next step would be a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM), which would present a specific regulatory proposal and analysis and provide another opportunity for public comment. We are very interested in comments fromAlaskans and have extended the comment period by 60days, until August 27, 2010. We believe a 120-day comment period is appropriate, especially because it is an ANPR . As we noted above, there will be additional opportunity for public comment if an NPRM is issued. Nevertheless, we understand your concern that the summer is busy for Alaska's aviators, and we will make every attempt to consider any comments received after the close ofthe comment period. We appreciate the information you submitted about potential impacts on Alaskan communities, including the potential economic impacts. We will carefully consider your comments, and we will take your concerns into account as we move forward in our rulemaking process. Additionally, we would be happy to work with the Senate General Aviation Caucus.

Internet Address (URL) 0 http://www .epa.gov Recycled/Recyclable e Printed with VegetableOil Based Inks on 100%Postconsumer, Process Chlorine Free Recycled PaperAgain, thank you for your letter. Ifyou have further questions, please contact me or your

staff may call Josh Lewis in EPA's Office ofCongressional and Intergovernmental Relations at (202) 564-2095. Sincerely,

ina McCarthy Assistant Administrator
```

[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 190 (Monday, October 2, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57929-57930]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-8395]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

Defense Science Board

AGENCY: Department of Defense.

ACTION: Notice of Advisory Committee Meetings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Science Board Task Force on VTOL/STOL will meet in 
closed session on October 11-12, 2006; at Strategic Analysis Inc., 3601 
Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA. This meeting continues the task 
force's work and will consist of a classified executive session on 
current technologies and programs.
    The mission of the Defense Science Board is to advise the Secretary 
of Defense and the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, 
Technology & Logistics on scientific and technical matters as they 
affect the perceived needs of the Department of Defense. At

[[Page 57930]]

these meetings, the Defense Science Board Task Force will: assess the 
features and capabilities VTOL/STOL aircraft should have in order to 
support the nation's defense needs through at least the first half of 
the 21st century.
    In accordance with Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act, Pub. L. 92-463, as amended (5 U.S.C. App. II), it has been 
determined that these Defense Science Board Task Force meetings concern 
matters listed in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1) and that, accordingly, the 
meetings will be closed to the public.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: CDR Clifton Phillips, USN, Defense 
Science Board, 3140 Defense Pentagon, Room 3C553, Washington, DC 20301-
3140, via e-mail at [email protected], or via phone at (703) 
571-0083.

    Dated: September 26, 2006.
C.R. Choate,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 06-8395 Filed 9-29-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M
```
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20463 

December 18,2012 

VIA FIRST CLASS MAIL 

Thomas J. Josefiak 

Holtzman Vogel Josefiak PLLC 

45 North Hill Drive 

Suite 100 

Warrenton, VA 20186 

RE: MUR 6696 

Crossroads GPS, Karl Rove, Haley Barbour, 

Steve Law and Caleb Crosby 

Dear Mr. Josefiak: 

This is in response to your letter dated December 17,2012, which we received on 

December 18, 2012, requesting a 30-day extension to respond to the complaint filed in the 

above-noted matter. After considering the circumstances presented in your letter, the Office of 

General Counsel will grant the requested extension contingent upon, receiving the Designation 

of Counsel forms. Accordingly, your responses and Designation of Counsel forms are due by 

the close of business on or before January 17,2013. 

If you have any questions, please contact me. on our toll-free telephone number, (800) 

424-9530. Our local telephone number is (202) 694-1650. 

Sincerely, 

Frankie D. Hampton, Pai-alega 

Complaints Examination and 

Legal Administration
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                        PURSUANT TO 18U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ace Marketing & Promotions, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Sean
McDonnell, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

                                                       /S/ SEAN MCDONNELL
                                                       -------------------------
                                                       SEAN MCDONNELL
                                                       CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                                       MAY 15, 2007