alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EUR-Lex - 12008E320 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008E320

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - PART SIX: INSTITUTIONAL AND FINANCIAL PROVISIONS - TITLE II: FINANCIAL PROVISIONS - Chapter 5: Common provisions - Article 320 (ex Article 277 TEC) **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0187 - 0187 *

Article 320

(ex Article 277 TEC)

The multiannual financial framework and the annual budget shall be drawn up in euro.

--------------------------------------------------
SERVED: October 10, 2014 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

JOSEPH MARIDON, SR. 

DOCKET NO. FAA 2014-0116 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

AMENDED PROCEDURAL ORDER 

We do not anticipate reaching this case prior to January 2015. 

Unless specifically changed herein all prior orders remain in effect. 

WHEREFORE, the parties be and are hereby ORDERED to adhere to the 

following procedural schedule: 

1. On or before January 9, 2015, the parties shall conclude all discovery including, 

but not limited to, depositions, document production, responses to production 

requests and/or interrogatories. If the parties cannot resolve a discovery dispute 

they shall submit the dispute to the undersigned for resolution in a timely manner; 

2. The parties shall be prepared to present this case at a hearing on or after January 

9, 2015, subject to the availability of courtroom facilities. The specific date and 

time for the hearing will be forthcoming in a separate Order. 

Richard C. Goodwin 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment - Service List 

. j . 
SERVICE LIST -BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W10001 

Joseph Maridon, Sr., Respondent 

9212 E. Frederick Ave 

Spokane, W A 99206-4303 

ONE COPY 

Joseph R. Maridon, Jr., Respondent's Counsel 

Attorney at Law 

6130 Elton Ave 

Las Vegas, NV 89107 

Naomi Tsuda, Complainant's Counsel 

Office ofthe Regional Counsel, AWP-7 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Western-Pacific Region, P.O. Box 92007 

Los Angeles, CA 90009-2007 

TEL: 310-725-7100 

FAX: 310-725-6816 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office ofHearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-5121 Staff Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

Docket No. FAA-2014-0116 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

2
# EUR-Lex - 12004V357 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V357

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART III — THE POLICIES AND FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - TITLE VI — THE FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - CHAPTER I — PROVISIONS GOVERNING THE INSTITUTIONS - Section 1 — The institutions - Subsection 5 — The Court of Justice of the European Union - Article III-357 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0157 - 0157 *

Article III-357

A panel shall be set up in order to give an opinion on candidates' suitability to perform the duties of Judge and Advocate-General of the Court of Justice and the General Court before the governments of the Member States make the appointments referred to in Articles III-355 and III-356.

The panel shall comprise seven persons chosen from among former members of the Court of Justice and the General Court, members of national supreme courts and lawyers of recognised competence, one of whom shall be proposed by the European Parliament. The Council shall adopt a European decision establishing the panel's operating rules and a European decision appointing its members. It shall act on the initiative of the President of the Court of Justice.

--------------------------------------------------
EXHIBIT 32-1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of WNC HOUSING TAX CREDIT FUND VI, L.P., SERIES 7 (the “Partnership”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), and pursuant to 18 U.S.C., section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Wilfred N. Cooper, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc., general partner of the Partnership, hereby certify that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.








/s/WILFRED N. COOPER, JR.


Wilfred N. Cooper, Jr.


President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.





Date: October 7, 2010
#### § 1206.20 What are the scope and purpose of publications grants?

Publications grants support projects intended to make widely available those documentary source materials important to the study and understanding of United States history. In order to receive a publications grant, a project must intend to publish historical records of national value and interest.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

327 

CA 15-00105 

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CARNI, LINDLEY, CURRAN, AND TROUTMAN, JJ. 

 

GENERATIONS CHILD CARE, INC., 

PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, 

V ORDER

LIVING WORD TEMPLE OF RESTORATION 

AND WILLIAM R. TURNER, JR., 

DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

 

KAMAN, BERLOVE, MARAFIOTI, JACOBSTEIN & GOLDMAN, LLP, ROCHESTER

(RICHARD GLENN CURTIS OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

LECLAIR KORONA GIORDANO COLE LLP, ROCHESTER (JEREMY M. SHER OF

COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme

Court, Monroe County (Thomas A. Stander, J.), entered October 8, 2014. 

The order and judgment determined the rights and obligations of the

parties pursuant to a certain lease agreement. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order and judgment so appealed from

is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated at Supreme

Court.

Entered: April 29, 2016 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
§ 200.6 Information available; inspection, copying, and charges. ( a ) In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 7 CFR 1.2, the Forest Service shall make available for public inspection and copying all published or unpublished directives, forms, records, and final opinions, including concurring or dissenting opinions and orders made in the adjudication of cases. Charges for information requested from the Forest Service are set out in paragraph (d) of this section and vary according to the type of information requested.
( b ) Information made available pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section may be obtained at the Office of the Chief, or the office of any Regional Forester, Research Station Director, Area Director, Institute Director, Forest Supervisor, or District Ranger. The addresses of these offices are set forth in §§ 200.1 and 200.2. Forest Service personnel at these offices will assist members of the public seeking Forest Service records. However, Research Station and Institute Directors and District Rangers may not have all volumes of the Forest Service Manual and Handbooks. When the information requested is not available at a given location, the personnel where the request is received will direct the requester to another office where the information may be obtained.
( c ) Inspection and copying availability is as follows: ( 1 ) Facilities for inspection and copying are available at the offices listed in §§ 200.1 and 200.2, during established office hours for the particular location, usually 8 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday through Friday. Copying facilities may not be available at all Forest Service offices.
( 2 ) Requesters for information may make copies of available information without charge if they elect to bring their own copy equipment to the appropriate offices listed in §§ 200.1 and 200.2.
( 3 ) Requesters should make prior arrangements for using agency copying facilities or for bringing in copying equipment and, in the later case, should get advance approval from the office.
( d ) Any request for information pursuant to the provisions of the Freedom of Information Act must be submitted in accordance with §§ 200.7 and 200.8. The Forest Service charges a fee for copies of records not generally made available to the public but released pursuant to a FOIA request in accordance with a schedule of fees established by the Department of Agriculture at 7 CFR Part 1, Subpart A, Appendix A. These fees do not apply to information that is generally and routinely made available to the public upon request, such as recreational brochures, pamphlets, maps, and technical guides as well as agency directive issuances. Separate charges for such general information are established in the agency's Directive System (§ 200.4). For example, some pamphlets and small segments of the Forest Service Manual and Handbook may be provided at no cost, but maps of the National Forest System and larger sections of the Manual and Handbook are available for a charge. Current charges are explained at the time the request is made.
[62 FR 13540, Mar. 21, 1997]
'IN 14th COlWOKAPPEALS HOUSlONi/EXAS JUN 17 2035 

# 4H * H-li'@P>$®& ~ceA rt~N-\mmkmiEeuumm- '. In \hc CLERK 

### (Wff o& ifyapeds 

### oJr ?&l fajfmm .Uu&W; 1?x^ 77QQ2. Chtulet Bfil 

### f/V,DOeSlgqi 4. "The S-hs4e c>£- *TfxCvS 

## (Appe^) 

# Apftf^i ftf£W- ^liar I4l2fr4j Jt4l3rjn lm«a 4*Vy ^HjjfJ^f E>is4ir»>- Pra 5><l hm£ or reSoonyL -ho &rv)Aer\ brwS- bo-khz U^nmi^phte i\oslices <£>£ -fl-fop Is: :

0 ^_

' n, 44**-i Arxap fil^j^ UaJ ik. n«M~ ihss 

### file a Pn) £e fen4 i£> ftr r?s,<e)fcmp A© 4*fop Q: : , .IfT, :

As^A\ At Ox ^ ld>-nte>'.f*&. yTM^in ! •) a? - (?'A &f?cs^ 4^ V-v,J '•>,-\p&?u 4'^ &-j£r&•-> mantes, ^ " $ v "' $ <Q '> ^J~^ I ' Cf C $ - 5f.

',"; ,." .9 ~ u ' " t \ •By gfrpPAik .SotT. : 

## Sg.Spgg.4^fti)llm St...hto4ffJ. : ^ptae^aM ?m &e
iar© Ahs.fege,g pig. Bwi. 

### l-W,;?"-e rfc TES^LXH>&if&i'g„r£ *sotUK ?&$>$. £f- So^W'fQ, 

### i hgrcka' £3UrK£-\x tyrJr on 44tt. &**> al AurtL. :2CHT,A. ir^e. A* I /.wr4 eon*.

-tCh&rks Rfefl "OoeAlafld^. Pfz3 && U 0 ^j) • " " ~ :' "" \t\ ^W^-i-aift/sJ Dufi^CQ H ii^ -rkft-tm Aw/l^U ."T^X/aA yVroJa A'^gsil ol&efgire- O^r
Proposed Rule: Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gas EmissionsMeeting DocumentationMeeting with the SemiconductorIndustry Association (SIA)DateStaff Contact Information(Name, email, phone #)Name of Organization (Attachlist of all attendees names andemails if possible)Summary of Discussion(e.g., applicability,reporting requirements, etc.)WrittenCommentsProvided?Did they alsosubmit toDocket?Date sent toEPA- CCDAugust 18,2011.Kirsten Cappel,cappel.kirsten@epa.gov(202) 343-9556David Isaacs, SIA(DIsaacs@sia-online.org)Julie Hatcher, Latham andWatkins, Counsel to SIA(julia.hatcher@lw.com)Brian Lynk, US DOJ(Brian.Lynk@usdoj.gov)US EPA:• Paul Gunning(gunning.paul@epa.gov)• Pamela Franklin(franklin.pamela@epa.gov)• Diane McConkey(mcconkey.diane@epa.gov)• Kirsten Cappel(cappel.kirsten@epa.gov)EPA and DOJ provided SIA with anupdate on the rule- “MandatoryReporting of Greenhouse Gases;Changes to Provisions for ElectronicsManufacturing (Subpart I) To ProvideFlexibility.”NASeptember12, 2011.
[No. 1347.]

#### The People ex rel. Rollins v. The Board of County Commissioner of Rio Grande County.

Opinion Hollowed.

This case is reversed on the same grounds as stated in the opinion in the case of *The People ex rel. Reynolds v. The Board of County Commissioners of Rio Grande County, ante,*p. 124.

*Error to the District Court of Rio Grande County.*

Messrs. Patterson, Richardson & Hawkins, for plaintiff in error.

Mr. Ira J. Bloomfield, Mr. C. M. Corlett and Mr. Jesse Stephenson, for defendants in error.

Thomson, P. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

In this case the judgment against the county was recovered by Albert W. Burrows, and by him transferred to this relator, Rollins. Eight of the warrants issued upon the judgment, amounting to $3,502.77, were paid. Otherwise the case is like the case of People ex rel. Reynolds against Rio Grande County, *ante,*p. 124, and requires the same disposition. The *138judgment should he credited with the amount paid, and mandamus issued to compel the payment of the residue, in accordance with instructions contained in the opinion in the *Reynolds*case. The judgment in this case is reversed and remanded for further proceedings in conformity with those instructions.

*Reversed.*

Wilson, J., not sitting.
§ 1002.21 Smoking. ( a ) The Board may designate a portion of the area administered by the Presidio Trust, or all or a portion of a building, structure or facility as closed to smoking when necessary to protect resources, reduce the risk of fire, or prevent conflicts among visitor use activities. Smoking in an area or location so designated is prohibited.
( b ) Smoking is prohibited within all caves and caverns.
[63 FR 35700, June 30, 1998, as amended at 71 FR 10610, Mar. 2, 2006]
# EUR-Lex - 12008E187 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008E187

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - PART THREE: UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS - TITLE XIX: RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT AND SPACE - Article 187 (ex Article 171 TEC) **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0131 - 0131 *

Article 187

(ex Article 171 TEC)

The Union may set up joint undertakings or any other structure necessary for the efficient execution of Union research, technological development and demonstration programmes.

--------------------------------------------------
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
The Schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements for Independence Tax Credit Plus L.P. and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000869615
<NAME>                        Independence Tax Credit Plus L.P.
<MULTIPLIER>                  1

       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-1997 
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-1996  
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1997 
<CASH>                                         10,864,166 
<SECURITIES>                                   0          
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0          
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0          
<INVENTORY>                                    0          
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1,742,839  
<PP&E>                                         183,169,973
<DEPRECIATION>                                 21,272,068 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 177,448,837
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          13,916,672 
<BONDS>                                        105,832,277
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0          
<PREFERRED>                                    0          
<COMMON>                                       0          
<OTHER-SE>                                     57,699,888 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   177,448,837
<SALES>                                        0          
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               19,592,514 
<CGS>                                          0          
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0          
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               19,090,801 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0          
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             5,765,176  
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,263,463)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0          
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0          
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0          
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0          
<CHANGES>                                      0          
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,263,463)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (67.43)    
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0          
                                               


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Tsan-Kun Wu, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of EUPAInternational Corporation (the “Registrant”).
     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisquarterly report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
     4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and we have:
          a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
          b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation;
          c) disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and
     5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, tothe Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of Registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
          a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
          b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
Date: November 15, 2004         /s/ Tsan-Kun Wu   Tsan-Kun Wu   President and Chief Executive Officer  
18
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk May 27, 2009

d0518 

# Order

May 27, 2009

137920(20)

DEBRA ELIZABETH KRUG, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 137920 COA: 289308 Roscommon Circuit Court KIM LEE VICTOR, Family Division: 05-725368-DZ Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for re consideration of this Court’s January 8, 2009 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does notappear that the order was entered erroneously.
#### § 665.105 At-sea observer coverage.

All fishing vessels subject to §§ 665.100 through 665.105 must carry an observer when directed to do so by the Regional Administrator.
, 

Room PL 401Washington, DC 20591-0001

From: Raytheon Missile Systems/Advanced Programs

Gregg GeorgeChief Pilot and Senior Principal Systems Engineer

P.O. Box 11337

Bldg 845, MS 5Tucson, AZ 85734-1337

520-794-2777

gregg georgeratheon. corn

Subj: Request for exemption from §91.215 (a) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations.

Ref: 14CFR91Raytheon is requesting an exemption from the following regulation:§ 91.215 (a) ATC transponder and altitude reporting equipment and use.

In part;(a) All airspace: U.S.-registered civil aircraft. For operations not conducted under part 121 or 135 of this

chapter, ATC transponder equipment installed must meet the performance and enviromTnental requirements

of any class of TSO-C74b (Mode A) or any class of TSO-C74c (Mode A with altitude reporting capability)

as appropriate, or the appropriate class of TSO-Cl 12 (Mode S).

Raytheon requests exemption from the requirement to use a TSO certified transponder in its unmanned aircraft

systems. The current TSO certified transponder Raytheon uses is the Microair T2000SF. This transponder is

not controllable from the ground station while the aircraft is in flight. The Non-TSO version of this transponderis the Microair T2000UAV-S, which allows full control from the ground control station while the aircraft is in

flight. We believe this is in the best interest of public safety in that we can utilize all the functions of the

transponder during flight.
Raytheon operates various Unmanned Aircraft Systems in the United States for missions related to research anddevelopment, crew training and market surveys. The new technologies developed to be used by the Department

of Defense, and other public agencies will contribute to overall public safety.The operations are in the public interest because they will support military and public agencies in the war on

tenor, homeland defense, border protection, law enforcement and disaster reliefRaytheon UAS operations will meet or exceed an equivalent level of safety because of the use of certified

engineering processes and quality control in the design and manufacturing of the aircraft, and the use of

certified pilots and engineers in the operations and maintenance of the UA systems.

Gregg L. GeorgeSenior Principal Systems Engineer

Chief Pilot

Systems Test Directorate

Flight Test OperationsRaytheon Missile Systems

cc: John E. Calloway

Manager, Flight Test Operations

Raytheon Missile Systems