alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 1280.24 Eating and drinking.

You may eat and drink inside NARA facilities only in designated areas. You may not eat or drink in any research rooms, records storage areas, or museum areas unless specifically authorized by the Archivist or designee. Facility directors may, by local rule, prohibit eating and drinking in designated outdoor areas of NARA facilities or NARA property, as well (*e.g.,* near artifacts that are on display outdoors).
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1455/2005

of 7 September 2005         

establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 of 21 December 1994 on detailed rules for the application of the import arrangements for fruit and vegetables (1), and in particular Article 4(1) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The standard import values referred to in Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 shall be fixed as indicated in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 8 September 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 7 September 2005.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

----

(1)OJ L 337, 24.12.1994, p. 66. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1947/2002 (OJ L 299, 1.11.2002, p. 17).

----

ANNEX

to Commission Regulation of 7 September 2005 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

----

(1)  Country nomenclature as fixed by Commission Regulation (EC) No 750/2005 (OJ L 126, 19.5.2005, p. 12). Code ‘            999            ’ stands for ‘of other origin’.

----
Total U.S. Exports to  New Caledonia

Data in Thousand Dollars 

Data For  JUN. 1999

|Group                 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | Year to Date 6/1998 | Year to Date 6/1999 | % Change | Year Ending 6/1998 | Year Ending 6/1999 | % Change | % Share
|--------------------- | ---- | ---- | ---- | ---- | ------------------- | ------------------- | -------- | ------------------ | ------------------ | -------- | -------
|TEXTILES & APPAREL    | 504  | 866  | 507  | 600  | 245                 | 138                 | -43.61   | 446                | 493                | 10.61    | 0      
|TOTAL APPAREL         | 414  | 527  | 388  | 577  | 233                 | 107                 | -54.11   | 362                | 451                | 24.36    | 0.01   
|M&B Kt T-shirt&Tk-top | 391  | 442  | 352  | 270  | 114                 | 27                  | -76.37   | 228                | 183                | -19.66   | 0.03   
|Hosiery               | 20   | 0    | 0    | 166  | 0                   | 0                   |          | 0                  | 166                |          | 0.04
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 13, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-50173

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

FILIBERTO VIVANCO-ATRIANO,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas 

USDC No. 2:05-CR-251 

--------------------

Before BARKSDALE, GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Filiberto Vivanco Atriano (Vivanco) appeals his sentence

following his convictions for possession of marijuana with intent

to distribute and importation of marijuana. He argues that the

district court misapplied the Sentencing Guidelines when it

erroneously denied him a minor-participant role adjustment to his

offense level under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2. Vivanco contends that he

was a simple courier. He argues that the district court failed

to consider the totality of the circumstances when applying the

Guidelines and instead erroneously stated that it could apply the
No. 06-50173

-2-

minor-participant role adjustment under § 3B1.2 only in

“exceptional” circumstances. 

We conclude that Vivanco has not shown that the district

court clearly erred when it denied him a minor-participant role

adjustment. See United States v. Atanda, 60 F.3d 196, 198-99

(5th Cir. 1995).

AFFIRMED.
§ 1001.10 Symbolic signs. ( a ) The signs pictured in 36 CFR 1.10 provide general information and regulatory guidance in the area administered by the Presidio Trust. Certain of the signs designate activities that are either allowed or prohibited. Activities symbolized by a sign bearing a slash mark are prohibited.
( b ) The use of other types of signs not herein depicted is not precluded.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                          39,211
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,495
<ALLOWANCES>                                       121
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                47,465
<PP&E>                                         214,869
<DEPRECIATION>                                  70,141
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 193,134
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           22,712
<BONDS>                                         15,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           333
<OTHER-SE>                                     154,589
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   193,134
<SALES>                                         39,966
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                38,230
<CGS>                                           22,844
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   22,844
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   300
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,589
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,488
<INCOME-TAX>                                        30
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,458
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,458
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.25




</TABLE>
# EUR-Lex - 12007P015 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12007P015

**Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - TITLE II - FREEDOMS - Article 15 - Freedom to choose an occupation and right to engage in work **

*
Official Journal 303 , 14/12/2007 P. 0005 - 0005 *

Article 15

Freedom to choose an occupation and right to engage in work

1. Everyone has the right to engage in work and to pursue a freely chosen or accepted occupation.

2. Every citizen of the Union has the freedom to seek employment, to work, to exercise the right of establishment and to provide services in any Member State.

3. Nationals of third countries who are authorised to work in the territories of the Member States are entitled to working conditions equivalent to those of citizens of the Union.

--------------------------------------------------
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d byN i nth C i r c ui tR ul e 36- 3. NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T G R A C E H E N Z L E R ; e t a l., P l ai n t i ffs - A p p el l an t s, v. K E N S A L A Z A R , in h is o f f ic ia l c ap a c ity a s S e c r e ta ryo f

th e I n te r io r ; e t a l., D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 09- 35597 D . C . N o . 3 : 0 7 - c v - 0 0 2 2 0 - T MB ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f orthe D i s tr i c tof

A l a s ka T i m othyM . B ur ge s s , D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng A r gue d a nd S ubm i tt e d J ul y26, 2010 A nc hor a ge , A l a s ka B efo re: S C H R O E D E R , O ’ S C A N N L A IN an d C L IF T O N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. G ra ce H enzl erand o ther hei rs of D i ck G eorge (“ H enzl er ”) appeal the di stri ct c o u rt’s s u m m a ryju d g m e n t in f a v o ro f th e S e c r e ta ryo f

th e I n te r io r . B a s e d o n its det ai l ed re vi ew of the re cord, the di stri ctcourtfoun d that“ the P l ai nt i ff s have f ai l ed t o pr e s e ntc r e di bl e e vi de nc e r a i s i ng af a c tua l i s s ue r e l a t e d t o due pr oc e s s a nd the



# FI LED AU G 26 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS2

1930 r e j e c t i on of

G e or ge ’ s a l l otm e ntappl i c a t i on. T he r e c or d e s t abl i s he s tha tthe m i ni m um r e qui r e m e nt s out l i ne d i n P ence v. Kleppe we r e me ta tth e t i me th e GLO c l o s e d G e o r g e ’ s f

i l e . ” W e a g r e e . A c c o r d i n g l y , w e a f f i rm. T h is C o u rt d e f

e r s to a n a g e n c y ’s r e a s o n ab le in te rp r e ta tio n o f its r e g u la tio n s . M art i n v. O cc up at i on alSa f et y & H eal th R ev i ew C om m ’n , 499 U . S . 144, 150 ( 1991) . U nde ri t s r e a s onabl e i nt e rpr e t a t i on of 43 C . F . R . pt . 4, the I nt e r i orB oa r d of L and A pp ea l s gener al l y does nothave autho ri ty t o o verrul e adeci si on thatw as ap p r o v e d b ya n A s s is ta n t S e c r e ta ry . B lue Star, Inc. , 4 1 I .B .L .A . 3 3 3 , 3 3 5 ( 1 9 7 9 ) . T h e S e c r e ta ryis r e q u ir e d , h o w e v e r , to p r o v id e p r o c e d u r a l d u e p r o c e s s to q u a lif y in g A la s k aN a tiv e A llo tm e n t A p p lic a n ts . P e nc e v . Kle ppe , 529 F . 2d 135, 14 2 (9th C i r. 19 76 ). In ca se s i nv ol vi ng a c ol orabl e c l ai m thatan appl i cantw as deni ed procedural du e proces s, the IB L A can and has overrul ed deci si on s e ven th o u g h ap p r o v e d b ya n A s s is ta n t S e c r e ta ry . Se e, e . g. , He i rs o f A lex a n de rWi l l i a ms , 1 2 1 I .B .L .A . 2 2 4 ( 1 9 9 1 ) ; E l le n Fr ank , 1 2 4 I .B .L .A . 3 4 9 ( 1 9 9 2 ) . B yf a ilin g to pres entcr edi bl e e vi dence ra i si ng a f ac tual i ss ue re l at ed t o d ue process , H enzl er f a i l e d t o e s t abl i s h ac ol or abl e c l a i m tha tD i c k G e or ge w a s de ni e d pr oc e dur a l due p ro cess. AF F I RME D.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of ArthroCare Corporation (the
Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



1.    The accompanying annual report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2003 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                                                                                           |  | 
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|Date: March 12, 2004 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    FERNANDO
SANCHEZFernando
Sanchez Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into
any filing of the Company, whether made before of after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
###### Editorial Note on Part 648

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 648 appear at 62 FR 14651, Mar. 27, 1997.

#### § 648.97 Closed areas.

(a) *Oceanographer Canyon Closed Area.* No fishing vessel or person on a fishing vessel may enter, fish, or be in the area known as Oceanographer Canyon Closed Area (copies of a chart depicting this area are available from the Regional Administrator upon request), as defined by straight lines connecting the following points in the order stated, while on a monkfish DAS:

| Point | N. Lat. | W. Long. |
| --- | --- | --- |
| (1) OC1 | 40°10′ | 68°12′ |
| (2) OC2 | 40°24′ | 68°09′ |
| (3) OC3 | 40°24′ | 68°08′ |
| (4) OC4 | 40°10′ | 67°59′ |
| (5) OC1 | 40°10′ | 68°12′ |

Oceanographer Canyon Closed Area

(b) *Lydonia Canyon Closed Area.* No fishing vessel or person on a fishing vessel may enter, fish, or be in the area known as Lydonia Canyon Closed Area (copies of a chart depicting this area are available from the Regional Administrator upon request), as defined by straight lines connecting the following points in the order stated, while on a monkfish DAS:

| Point | N. Lat. | W. Long. |
| --- | --- | --- |
| (1) LC1 | 40°16′ | 67°34′ |
| (2) LC2 | 40°16′ | 67°42′ |
| (3) LC3 | 40°20′ | 67°43′ |
| (4) LC4 | 40°27′ | 67°40′ |
| (5) LC5 | 40° 27′ | 67°38′ |
| (6) LC1 | 40°16′ | 67°34′ |

Lyndonia Canyon Closed Area

[70 FR 21946, Apr. 28, 2005]
# EUR-Lex - 12006E220 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12006E220

**Treaty establishing the European Community (consolidated version) - Part Five - Institutions of the Community - TITLE I - Provisions governing the institutions - Chapter 1 - The institutions - Section 4 - The Court of Justice - Article 220 **

*
Official Journal C 321 E , 29/12/2006 P. 0141 - 0141 Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0122 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0269 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0060 - Consolidated version (EEC Treaty - no official publication available) *

Article 220

The Court of Justice and the Court of First Instance, each within its jurisdiction, shall ensure that in the interpretation and application of this Treaty the law is observed.

In addition, judicial panels may be attached to the Court of First Instance under the conditions laid down in Article 225a in order to exercise, in certain specific areas, the judicial competence laid down in this Treaty.

--------------------------------------------------
#### § 1915.1048 Formaldehyde.

Note:

The requirements applicable to shipyard employment under this section are identical to those set forth at [§ 1910.1048 of this chapter](/on/2024-09-23/title-29/section-1910.1048).

[[61 FR 31431](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/61-FR-31431), June 20, 1996]
# EUR-Lex - 12008E/AFI/DCL/59 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008E/AFI/DCL/59

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - DECLARATIONS annexed to the Final Act of the Intergovernmental Conference which adopted the Treaty of Lisbon, signed on 13 December 2007 - C. DECLARATIONS BY MEMBER STATES - 59. Declaration by the Kingdom of the Netherlands on Article 312 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0357 - 0357 *

59. Declaration by the Kingdom of the Netherlands on Article 312 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

The Kingdom of the Netherlands will agree to a decision as referred to in the second subparagraph of Article 312(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union once a revision of the decision referred to in the third paragraph of Article 311 of that Treaty has provided the Netherlands with a satisfactory solution for its excessive negative net payment position vis-à-vis the Union budget.

--------------------------------------------------
§ 1201.40 Which debts can NARA refer to the Treasury for collection by offsetting tax refunds? ( a ) The regulations in this subpart implement 31 U.S.C. 3720A, which authorizes the Treasury to reduce a tax refund by the amount of a past-due, legally enforceable debt owed to a Federal agency.
( b ) For purposes of this section, a past-due, legally enforceable debt referrable to the Treasury for tax refund offset is a debt that is owed to NARA and: ( 1 ) Is at least $25.00;
( 2 ) Except in the case of a judgment debt, has been delinquent for at least three months and will not have been delinquent more than 10 years at the time the offset is made;
( 3 ) With respect to which NARA has: ( i ) Given the debtor at least 60 days to present evidence that all or part of the debt is not past due or legally enforceable;
( ii ) Considered evidence presented by the debtor; and
( iii ) Determined that an amount of the debt is past due and legally enforceable;
( 4 ) With respect to which NARA has notified or has made a reasonable attempt to notify the debtor that: ( i ) The debt is past due, and
( ii ) Unless repaid within 60 days of the date of the notice, the debt may be referred to the Treasury for offset against any refund of overpayment of tax; and
( 5 ) All other requirements of 31 U.S.C. 3720A and the Treasury regulations relating to the eligibility of a debt for tax return offset (31 CFR 285.2) have been satisfied.
§ 1010.6 Determination of requirement for EA or EIS. In deciding whether to require the preparation of an EA or an EIS, the NEPA Compliance Coordinator will determine whether the proposal is one that: ( a ) Normally does not require either an EA or an EIS;
( b ) Normally requires an EIS; or
( c ) Normally requires an EA, but not necessarily an EIS.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 5551 

To extend the statute of limitations for offenses relating to pandemic-era 

programs to be 10 years. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 17 (legislative day, DECEMBER 16), 2024 

Mr. LANKFORD (for himself and Ms. ERNST) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To extend the statute of limitations for offenses relating 

to pandemic-era programs to be 10 years. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fraudulent Covid 

5 Funds Recovery Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS FOR OFFENSES RELAT7 ING TO PANDEMIC-ERA PROGRAMS. 

8 (a) DEFINITIONS.—In this section— 

9 (1) the term ‘‘pandemic-era law’’ means— 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 5551 IS

1 (A) the Coronavirus Preparedness and Re2 sponse Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2020 

3 (Public Law 116–123; 134 Stat. 146); 

4 (B) the Families First Coronavirus Re5 sponse Act (Public Law 116–127; 134 Stat. 

6 177); 

7 (C) the CARES Act (Public Law 116–136; 

8 134 Stat. 281); 

9 (D) the Paycheck Protection Program and 

10 Health Care Enhancement Act (Public Law 

11 116–139; 134 Stat. 620); 

12 (E) divisions M and N of the Consolidated 

13 Appropriations Act, 2021 (Public Law 116– 

14 260; 134 Stat. 1182); 

15 (F) the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 

16 (Public Law 117–2; 135 Stat. 4); or 

17 (G) an amendment made by a law de18 scribed in subparagraphs (A) through (F); and 

19 (2) the term ‘‘pandemic-era program offense’’ 

20 means an offense involving conduct that relates to or 

21 involves— 

22 (A) a program, project, or activity that 

23 was authorized or established by, or was carried 

24 out under, a pandemic-era law; or 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 5551 IS

1 (B) funding provided under a pandemic2 era law. 

3 (b) EXTENSION OF STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS.—No 

4 person shall be prosecuted, tried, or punished for any pan5 demic-era offense unless the indictment is found or the 

6 information is instituted— 

7 (1) notwithstanding section 3282(a) of title 18, 

8 United States Code, within 10 years after such of9 fense shall have been committed; or 

10 (2) within such longer period of years after 

11 such offense shall have been committed as is other12 wise provided by law. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Your session is about to expire.Resume session

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Welcome.Log inorregisterCOPS OFFICE RESOURCE CENTER

HomeCatalogCartOrders

                    

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                CatalogMatches: 1Offline form Recent Popular Online Print OtherCOPS-P221The Collaboration Toolkit for Law Enforcement: Effective Strategies to Partner with the CommunityLaw enforcement alone cannot implement and advance community policing. Community leaders, researchers, and police officials recognize the need for a strong, well-articulated role for community members in community policing efforts. They know that the police cannot substantially impact crime by themselves, so they advocate for the community to act as a full partner in preventing and responding to problems. Community involvement and collaboration is an integral part of any long-term, problem-solving strategy. At the most basic level, the community provides law enforcement agencies with invaluable information on both the problems that concern them and the nature of those problems. The Collaboration Toolkit for Law Enforcement: Effective Strategies to Partner with the Community is designed to help law enforcement initiate partnerships within their communities to collaborate on solving crime problems at the neighborhood level.By Michael S. McCampbellCategories: Community Partnerships • Foundations of Community Policing • Police OperationsLanguage: EnglishPublic linkhttps://portal.cops.usdoj.gov/resourcecenter?item=cops-p221Click here to see the entire catalog.Cart:Download PDFBook • Dec 2011Search catalogreset title abstract authors contentContaining text: exact phraseNot containing text: exact phraseLanguage:anyEnglishSpanishHmongVietnameseCategory:anyAlternatives to IncarcerationCommunity PartnershipsData and AnalysisEthics and IntegrityFoundations of Community PolicingHiring, Recruitment, and RetentionHomeland SecurityNew Immigrant CommunitiesNonviolent CrimeOtherPolice OperationsPOP Center ResourceSchool and Campus SafetyTechnologyTribalViolent CrimeYouth SafetyPublished after:Published before:Page1

                    

FOIA | No FEAR Act | Open Government | Privacy | Legal|HelpCopyright (C) U.S. Department of Justice, COPS Office, IT Division, 2012 - 2024. All rights reserved.
Rendered on Mon Mar 4 2024 at 05:54 (UTC-5) in 0.19 secEnterprise Framework 3.21.7.7 • Store Controls 3.3.1.7Survey 500303407 Section 60000560 Rules Hints Inactive