alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of XTO Energy Inc.

(Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the Annual Report of XTO
Energy Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Bob R. Simpson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
and Louis G. Baldwin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ BOB R. SIMPSON     
|Bob R. Simpson         
|Chief Executive Officer
|March 1, 2007          
|                       
|/s/ LOUIS G. BALDWIN   
|Louis G. Baldwin       
|Chief Financial Officer
|March 1, 2007
**EXHIBIT 12.2**

 

CERTIFICATION

 

I, W. Peter Day, certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewed this Amendment No. 2 to theannual report on Form 20-F of Amcor Limited;

 

2.               Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this annual report;

 

3.               The company’s other certifying officer and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15(d)-15(e)) for the companyand have:

 

(a)                                  Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to thecompany, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;

 

(b)                                 Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)                                  Disclosed in this report any change in thecompany’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theperiod covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

4.     The company’s other certifying officer and Ihave disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the company’s auditors and audit committee of thecompany’s board of directors:

 

(a)                                  All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s abilityto record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)                                 Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in thecompany’s internal control over financial reporting

 

Date: June 6, 2005

 
|   |   /s/  W. Peter Day                          |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   Name:  W. Peter Day                        |
|   |   Title:  Executive General Manager, Finance |

 

----
•••R^RTMENTOF 

SERVED FEBRUARY 23, 2011 ^NSPORWiON 

i ^ ^ V%;4ikDPERATiON 

!![! 2U A S: 28 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

E^ THE MATTER OF 

INTERTECH OVERLOAD, INC. 

FAA DOCKET No. CP10WP0003 

(Civil Penalty Case) 

DMSFAA-2010-0194 

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR DECISION 

AND VACATING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 

The Order to Show Cause of February 9, 2011 ("Order") required Respondent 

Intertech Overload, Inc. ("Respondent") to state, no later than February 18, 2011, why the 

relief requested by Complainant Federal Aviation Administration ("Complainant") in its 

Motion for Decision ("Motion") of January 12, 2011' should not be granted. The 

Motion argued that Respondent admitted the facts imderlying the charges and requested a 

decision and civil penalty, or, in the alternative, a decision on the charges and a hearing 

limited to the issue of sanction. Respondent filed a response to the Order on the due date. 

Respondent's answer sufficiently joins the allegations of the Complaint. I find 

that genuine issues of fact exist and Complainant is not entitled to judgment as a matter 

of law. Therefore, Complainant's Motion is DENIED in its entirety, and the Order is 

VACATED. The matter will proceed.^ 

' The Motion's full title is Motion for Decision Without a Hearing Or, in the Alternative, Motion to Limit 

the Issues at Hearing to Sanction. 

^ 1 also am mindful of the Administrator's belief that cases should be decided on the merits whenever 

possible. See Safety Equipment and Sign Co., Ltd, FAA Order No. 92-76, p. 5, 1992 FAA Lexis 280 

(December 21, 1992), cited in Larry's Flying Service, FAA Order No. 98-4 (March 12, 1998). 
/ 

SO ORDERED. 

joodwin —J 

' U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment - Service List 

tab,.. 
*^' 

FAA Docket No. CP10WP0003 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building - Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

William H. Schultz, Respondent's Counsel 

Schultz Law Firm 

32123 Lindero Canyon Road, Suite 203 

Westlake Village, CA 91361-5412 

TEL: 818-901-1919 

FAX: 818-901-1996 

Dean Cambe, Sr., President 

Intertech Overload, Inc., Respondent 

7701 Woodley Avenue 

VanNuys, CA 91406 

Courtney Adolph, Complainant's Counsel 

Office of the Regional Counsel 

Western-Pacific Region, AWP-7 

Federal Aviation Administration 

P.O. Box 92007 

Los Angeles, CA 90009-2007 

TEL: 310-725-7128 

FAX: 310-725-6816 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room E12-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: Attorney-Advisor 202-366-2139 

Legal Assistant 202-366-5121 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: 

Hearing Docket, Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S. W., Wilbur Wright Building - Room 

2014, Washington, DC 20591, Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
§ 1004.10 Travel on Presidio Trust roads and designated routes. ( a ) Operating a motor vehicle is prohibited except on Presidio Trust roads and in parking areas.
( b ) The following are prohibited: ( 1 ) Operating a motor vehicle not equipped with pneumatic tires, except that a track-laying motor vehicle or a motor vehicle equipped with a similar traction device may be operated on a route designated for these vehicles by the Board.
( 2 ) Operating a motor vehicle in a manner that causes unreasonable damage to the surface of a Presidio Trust road or route.
§ 1225.22 When must agencies reschedule or review their records schedules? ( a ) Every five years, agencies must review all records schedules that are ten years old and older, based on the date that NARA approved the schedule. Agencies may also review their agency records schedules on a more frequent regular basis to determine if they remain accurate.
( b ) Agencies must submit a new records schedule to NARA in the following situations: ( 1 ) If an interagency reorganization reassigns functions to an existing department or agency, the gaining organization must submit a new records schedule to NARA within one year of the reorganization. Schedules approved for one department or independent agency do not apply to the records of other departments or agencies.
( 2 ) If a new department or agency assumes functions from an existing one, the new agency must schedule records documenting the acquired functions and all other records not covered by the GRS within two years.
( 3 ) If an agency needs to deviate from retention periods in the GRS.
( 4 ) If an agency needs to change retention periods for records previously appraised as temporary by NARA.
( 5 ) If an agency needs to change the approved disposition of records from permanent to temporary or vice versa.
( 6 ) If an agency needs to modify the description of records because the informational content of the records and/or the function documented by the records changes.
( 7 ) If an agency decides to change the scope of the records schedule items to include a greater or lesser aggregation of records (see § 1225.12(c)), unless § 1225.24 applies.
( 8 ) Agencies must submit a new schedule to NARA for electronic versions of previously scheduled records if: ( i ) The content and function of the records have changed significantly (e.g., the electronic records contain information that is substantially different from the information included in the hard copy series or are used for different purposes).
( ii ) The previously approved schedule explicitly excludes electronic records.
( iii ) The electronic records consist of program records maintained on an agency Web site.
( iv ) The electronic records consist of temporary program records maintained in a format other than scanned image AND the previously approved schedule is not media neutral.
[74 FR 51014, Oct. 2, 2009, as amended at 88 FR 28416, May 4, 2023]
# EUR-Lex - 12007P045 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12007P045

**Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - TITLE V - CITIZENS' RIGHTS - Article 45 - Freedom of movement and of residence **

*
Official Journal 303 , 14/12/2007 P. 0011 - 0011 *

Article 45

Freedom of movement and of residence

1. Every citizen of the Union has the right to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States.

2. Freedom of movement and residence may be granted, in accordance with the Treaties, to nationals of third countries legally resident in the territory of a Member State.

--------------------------------------------------
#### § 36.36 Sled dogs and household pets.

The general trespass provisions of 50 CFR 26.21 shall not apply to household pets and sled, work, or pack dogs under the direct control of their owners or handlers, but such activities may be prohibited or otherwise restricted pursuant to the provisions of § 36.42.

[46 FR 40192, Aug. 7, 1981]
#### § 1206.54 Who may apply for NHPRC grants?

The Commission will consider applications from State government agencies in States where there is an active board; local government agencies; United States nonprofit organizations and institutions, including institutions of higher education; or Federally-acknowledged and State-recognized American Indian tribes or groups.

[75 FR 66318, Oct. 28, 2010]
<html><head><title>Rate of Large Earthquakes Diagram</title><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"></head><body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" link="#660000" vlink="#003366"><table border="0" width="545" height="308" align="center">  <tr>    <td><img src="images/percentage.jpg" width="532" height="714"></td>  </tr>  <tr>    <td><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">The threat       of earthquakes extends across the entire San Francisco Bay region, and a       major quake is likely before 2030. Knowing this will help people make informed       decisions as they continue to prepare for future quakes.</font></td>  </tr></table><p><font size="+1"><b><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Return   to Major Results</font></b></font></p></body></html>
§ 20.2 Permits; conditions. Annual, revocable special use permits authorizing the use of Government-owned structures and facilities in the Park as bases for commercial fishing in the waters contiguous to the Park may be granted by the Director of the National Park Service, or the Regional Director if authorized by the Director, to bona fide commercial fishermen, where such structures and facilities were used for this purpose during the period from April 1, 1937, to December 31, 1939, inclusive, subject to the following conditions. ( a ) Permittees will be required to pay an annual fee as set forth in part 6 of this chapter.
( b ) Permittees shall personally reside at their Park bases during the fishing season.
( c ) Permittees shall secure and possess at all times such commercial fishing license as may be required by the State of Michigan.
( d ) Permittees shall comply with all Michigan laws, and related regulations prescribed by the Michigan Department of Conservation, governing commercial fishing in the waters contiguous to the Park.
( e ) Permittees shall use the bases covered by the permit for commercial fishing only. No permittee shall furnish boat or guide service to the public unless expressly authorized to do so by the Secretary or the Director.
( f ) Permittees shall maintain at their own expense, in accordance with reasonable standards of repair, safety, and sanitation, all Government-owned structures and facilities embraced in the permits.
( g ) The size, type and location of nets and gear and the number of men engaged in the operation of the fishing base of the permittee shall be prescribed in the permit. Only nets and gear approved by the Michigan Department of Conservation shall be used.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,107
<ALLOWANCES>                                       638
<INVENTORY>                                     59,942
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                66,646
<PP&E>                                          34,916
<DEPRECIATION>                                  20,849
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  98,168
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           47,622
<BONDS>                                        107,871
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            30
<OTHER-SE>                                    (48,622)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    98,168
<SALES>                                         29,560
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                29,560
<CGS>                                           17,934
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   17,934
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,018
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,014
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,406)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (548)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (858)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (858)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.17)
        

</TABLE>
# • RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 65{PRIVATE} Mining Waste Exclusion 54 FR 36592-36642 September 1, 1989 (Non-HSWA ClusterVI) This present checklist istitled "Mining Waste Exclusion I" indicating that itisthe first of two amendments tothis exclusion. The second amendment occurred at55 FR 2322 on January 23, 1990 and isaddressed by Revision Checklist 71 - Mining Waste Exclusion II. This latter checklist will be made available through SPA 9. STATE ANALOG IS;

FEDERAL REQUIREMENT I FEDERAL RCBA CITAnON I ANALOGOUS STAIECITAnON EQUIV· MORE IALENT I BROADER STRINGENTI INSCOP PART261 • IDENTIFICATION AND LISTING OF HAZARDOUS WASTES SUBPART A- GENERAL 

# •

• add exception for mixture ofa 261.4(b)(7) waste and asolid waste exhibiting aSubpart C characteristic unless resultant mixture meets certain characteristic conditions; mixture ishazardous relative tothe EP toxicity characteristic add "of this part" after "Subpart D"; add language excepting mixtures of hazardous waste and solid waste excluded under 261.4(b)(7) and the mixture no longer exhibits hazardous characteristics for which the hazardous waste was listed in Subpart D define beneficiation; replace the last three words ofthe paragraph, "does not include", with 'includes only' 261.3(a)(2)(i)

261.3(a)(2)(iii)

261.4(b)(7) No Analog

No Analog

No Analog September 1, 1989 - Page 1of2 

## x

x

xRCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 65: Mining Waste Exclusion I (cont'd) 

# c STATE A

990). FEDERAL REQUIREMENT solid wastes, from ore and mineral processing, that are retained within exclusion solid wastes from ore and mineral processing that are conditionally retained within the exclusion FEDERAL RCRACITATION
261.4(b)(7)(j)(AHE)
261.4(b)(7)(ii)(A)-m ANALOGOUS STATE CITATION

No Analog

No Analog EQUIV· IALENT I MORE BROADER STRINGENTI INSCOP



# x

x


# o

See subsequent technical correction tothe definition of"beneficiation" as addressed by Revision Checklist 71 (55 FR 2322, January23,



# o September 1, 1989 - Page 2of2
Case 16-27386 Doc 11 Filed 09/13/16 Entered 09/14/16 07:48:33 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
#### HELEN BUJALSKI AS GUARDIAN AD LITEM FOR ALEX KULINKA, PETITIONER-APPELLEE, v. FLOCKHART FOUNDRY COMPANY, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division

Argued October 29, 1951

Decided November 7, 1951.

Before Judges McGeetian, Jayne and Wm. J. Bkennan, Je.

*250*Mr. Frank Fink*argued the cause for appellant *(Mr. James J. Carroll,*attorney).

*Mr. Alexander Avidan*argued the cause for appellee *(Messrs. Avidan <& Avidan*and *Miss Sara M. Lewitt,*attorneys).

Pee Ctjeiam.

The judgment under appeal is affirmed on' the findings of fact and conclusions and for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Francis reported *sub nom. Kulinka v. Flockhart Foundry Co.,*9 *N. J. Super.*495*(Cty. Ct.*1950), except in two particulars. The statement that “It is conceivable that his foot may have struck the edge of the closed portion of the side of the cab, when he attempted to swing his leg over the rail” is unnecessary. Under the facts found by the County Court, the- petitioner proved an accident arising out of and in the course of his employment without any need, under the circumstances, to prove that the loss of balance which brought about his fall from his hazardous perch was caused by any particular movement. *Cf. Jochim v. Montrose Chemical Co., 3 N. J.*5 (1949); *Reynolds v. Passaic Valley Sewerage Commrs.,*130 *N. J. L.*437*(Sup. Ct.*1943), affirmed 131 *N. J. L.*327*(E. & A.*1944). In the conclusion that “the respondent has not excluded the particular hazards of Kulinka’s employment task as a possible cause or contributory or concurring cause of his fall” the words “possible cause” should be “probable cause.” We think the use of the word “possible” instead of “probable” was inadvertent, but in any event our examination of the record leads us to’ concur in the conclusion as corrected.

Affirmed.
# EUR-Lex - 12008E/AFI/DCL/17 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008E/AFI/DCL/17

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - DECLARATIONS annexed to the Final Act of the Intergovernmental Conference which adopted the Treaty of Lisbon, signed on 13 December 2007 - A. DECLARATIONS CONCERNING PROVISIONS OF THE TREATIES - 17. Declaration concerning primacy **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0344 - 0344 *

17. Declaration concerning primacy

The Conference recalls that, in accordance with well settled case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union, the Treaties and the law adopted by the Union on the basis of the Treaties have primacy over the law of Member States, under the conditions laid down by the said case law.

The Conference has also decided to attach as an Annex to this Final Act the Opinion of the Council Legal Service on the primacy of EC law as set out in 11197/07 (JUR 260):

"Opinion of the Council Legal Service

of 22 June 2007

It results from the case-law of the Court of Justice that primacy of EC law is a cornerstone principle of Community law. According to the Court, this principle is inherent to the specific nature of the European Community. At the time of the first judgment of this established case law (Costa/ENEL, 15 July 1964, Case 6/641 [1] there was no mention of primacy in the treaty. It is still the case today. The fact that the principle of primacy will not be included in the future treaty shall not in any way change the existence of the principle and the existing case-law of the Court of Justice.

[1] "It follows (...) that the law stemming from the treaty, an independent source of law, could not, because of its special and original nature, be overridden by domestic legal provisions, however framed, without being deprived of its character as Community law and without the legal basis of the Community itself being called into question.""

--------------------------------------------------