alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|  |
|--|
| Home |  Advanced Search |  Directory |  Site Map |  Privacy Policy |  Accessibility |  Contact Us                                          |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| About  Our Work  Career Opportunities  Business With Us  Information Resources  Outreach |
|  

LIBRARY

VOLPE JOURNAL

HIGHLIGHTS

PUBLISHED AND PRESENTED

BIBLIOGRAPHIES

TRANSPORTATIONSTRATEGIC PLANS

LINKS                  |  

National Science and Technology Council
National Research Agenda for Transportation and Sustainable CommunitiesSeptember 1999Table of Contents
Transportation and Sustainable Communities Team

Notice

Executive Summary

Introduction

Background

Proposed Initiatives and their Linkages

Initiative 1: Strategic Research to Support Sustainable Transportation

1.1  Expanded Program and Policy Options

1.2 Land Development and Travel Behavior

1.3 Future Transportation Vehicle and Fuel Systems

Initiative 2: Case Studies to Promote Sustainable Communities

Initiative 3: Education for Transportation and Sustainability

Conclusion and Next Steps

Appendix A -  Excerpts from Transportation and Sustainable Communities Initiative:Overview of Federal Sustainable Transportation Activities, June 1, 1998

Approach to Transportation and Sustainability

Policy Context and Desired Outcomes

Return to Top
List of Figures
Figure 1: Approximate Schedule for Transportation and Sustainable Communities Initiative Activities

Figure 2: Sustainable Transportation Systems

Figure A-1: Transportation and Sustainability

Return to Top

Next Section |

 
|   U.S. Department of Transportation | Research and Innovative Technology Administration  |   |
|------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------|--------|
# EUR-Lex - 12008M/PRO/18 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008M/PRO/18

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on European Union - PROTOCOLS - Protocol (No 18) on France **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0289 - 0289 *

PROTOCOL (No 18)

ON FRANCE

THE HIGH CONTRACTING PARTIES,

DESIRING to take into account a particular point relating to France,

HAVE AGREED UPON the following provisions, which shall be annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union:

France will keep the privilege of monetary emission in New Caledonia, French Polynesia and Wallis and Futuna under the terms established by its national laws, and will be solely entitled to determine the parity of the CFP franc.

--------------------------------------------------
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

TYREE WATSON,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 4 EAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 27th day of June, 2022

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
§ 1202.46 In what ways will NARA provide access? ( a ) At your request, NARA will provide you, or a person authorized by you, a copy of the records by mail or by making the records available in person during normal business hours at the NARA facility where the records are located. If you are seeking access in person, the system manager will permit you to examine the original record, will provide you with a copy of the records, or both.
( b ) When obtaining access to the records in person at a NARA facility, you must provide proof of identification either by producing at least one piece of identification bearing a name or signature and either a photograph or physical description (e.g., a driver's license or employee identification card) or by signing the Certification of Identity form described in § 1204.40 (b)(5). NARA reserves the right to ask you to produce additional pieces of identification to assure NARA of your identity. You will also be asked to sign an acknowledgement that you have been given access.
§ 1238.10 What are the format standards for microfilming records? The following formats must be used when microfilming records: ( a ) *Roll film* — ( 1 ) *Source documents.* The formats described in ANSI/AIIM MS14 (incorporated by reference, see § 1238.5) must be used for microfilming source documents on 16mm and 35mm roll film. A reduction ratio no greater than 1:24 is recommended for correspondence or similar typewritten documents. Use ANSI/AIIM MS23 (incorporated by reference, see § 1238.5) for the appropriate reduction ratio and format for meeting image quality requirements. When microfilming on 35mm film for aperture card applications, the format dimensions in ANSI/AIIM MS32 (incorporated by reference, see § 1238.5), Table 1 must be used, and the aperture card format “D Aperture” shown in ANSI/AIIM MS41 (incorporated by reference, see § 1238.5), Figure 1, must be used. The components of the aperture card, including the paper and adhesive, must conform to the requirements of ANSI/PIMA IT9.2 (incorporated by reference, see § 1238.5). The 35mm film used in the aperture card application must conform to film designated as LE 500 in ISO 18901 (incorporated by reference, see § 1238.5).
( 2 ) *COM.* Microfilm created using computer output microfilm (COM) technology must use the simplex mode described in ANSI/AIIM MS14 (incorporated by reference, see § 1238.5) at an effective ratio of 1:24 or 1:48 depending upon the application.
( b ) *Microfiche.* When creating microfiche, either by microfilming source documents or using COM technology, the formats and reduction ratios prescribed in ANSI/AIIM MS5 (incorporated by reference, see § 1238.5) must be used as specified for the size and quality of the documents being filmed. Use ANSI/AIIM MS23 (incorporated by reference, see § 1238.5) for determining the appropriate reduction ratio and format for meeting the image quality requirements.
( c ) *Index placement* — ( 1 ) *Source documents.* When microfilming source documents, place indexes, registers, or other finding aids, if microfilmed, either in the first frames of the first roll of film or in the last frames of the last roll of film of a series. For microfiche, place the indexes in the last frames of the last microfiche or microfilm jacket of a series.
( 2 ) *COM.* Place indexes on COM following the data on a roll of film, in the last frames of a single microfiche, or in the last frames of the last fiche in a series. Other locations for indexes may be used only if dictated by special system constraints.
# EUR-Lex - 12008E078 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008E078

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - PART THREE: UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS - TITLE V: AREA OF FREEDOM, SECURITY AND JUSTICE - Chapter 2: Policies on border checks, asylum and immigration - Article 78 (ex Articles 63, points 1 and 2, and 64(2) TEC) **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0076 - 0077 *

Article 78

(ex Articles 63, points 1 and 2, and 64(2) TEC)

1. The Union shall develop a common policy on asylum, subsidiary protection and temporary protection with a view to offering appropriate status to any third-country national requiring international protection and ensuring compliance with the principle of non-refoulement. This policy must be in accordance with the Geneva Convention of 28 July 1951 and the Protocol of 31 January 1967 relating to the status of refugees, and other relevant treaties.

2. For the purposes of paragraph 1, the European Parliament and the Council, acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure, shall adopt measures for a common European asylum system comprising:

(a) a uniform status of asylum for nationals of third countries, valid throughout the Union;

(b) a uniform status of subsidiary protection for nationals of third countries who, without obtaining European asylum, are in need of international protection;

(c) a common system of temporary protection for displaced persons in the event of a massive inflow;

(d) common procedures for the granting and withdrawing of uniform asylum or subsidiary protection status;

(e) criteria and mechanisms for determining which Member State is responsible for considering an application for asylum or subsidiary protection;

(f) standards concerning the conditions for the reception of applicants for asylum or subsidiary protection;

(g) partnership and cooperation with third countries for the purpose of managing inflows of people applying for asylum or subsidiary or temporary protection.

3. In the event of one or more Member States being confronted by an emergency situation characterised by a sudden inflow of nationals of third countries, the Council, on a proposal from the Commission, may adopt provisional measures for the benefit of the Member State(s) concerned. It shall act after consulting the European Parliament.

--------------------------------------------------
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 19

- 00170

- CV

C RUZ V ENZOR AND J UANA M UNOZ

, Appellants

V

.

AMG BT N OTE O NE

, LLC AND

A UGUST REI H OLDINGS

, LLC, Appellees §

§

§

§ O n Appeal from the 67th District Court

of Tarrant County (067

- 306116

- 19)

November 2 1 , 2019

Per Curiam

JUDGMEN T

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that the

appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for want of

prosecution

.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

PER CURIAM
**Exhibit 32.1****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER****Pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350)**     I, Randy K. Ferrell, as the President and Chief Executive Officer of FauquierBankshares, Inc., certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, the QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006, which accompanies thiscertification fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of FauquierBankshares, Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated. The foregoing certificationis made pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350) and shallnot be relied upon for any other purpose. The undersigned expressly disclaims anyobligation to update the foregoing certification except as required by law.        Date: May 12, 2006 /s/  Randy K. Ferrell   Randy K. Ferrell   President and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 11


                          HEALTH RISK MANAGEMENT, INC.
                     COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE (EPS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                Primary EPS                             Fully Diluted EPS
                                             Year Ended June 30                         Year Ended June 30
                                   ---------------------------------------    ---------------------------------------
                                       1995         1996         1997            1995         1996         1997
                                       ----         ----         ----            ----         ----         ----
<S>                                    <C>          <C>          <C>             <C>         <C>            <C>

Earnings (in thousands):
   Earnings for period indicated       $    844     $  1,996     $  2,241        $    844    $  1,996       $  2,241
                                           ====        =====        =====             ===       =====          =====

Number of Shares:
   Weighted average number of
     shares of common stock
     outstanding                      3,946,933    4,080,542    4,291,349       3,946,933   4,080,542      4,291,349
   Weighted average number of
     shares of common stock
     equivalents                         35,160      138,644      166,752          47,472     175,001        199,230
                                      ---------    ---------    ---------       ---------   ---------      ---------

   Number of shares included in
     per share computation for
     the period indicated             3,982,093    4,219,186    4,458,101       3,994,405   4,255,543      4,490,579
                                      =========    =========    =========       =========   =========      =========

Net earnings per share                  $  0.21      $  0.47      $  0.50         $  0.21     $  0.47        $  0.50
                                           ====         ====         ====            ====        ====           ====
</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6255

MACK LEE NICHOLS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

MARTIN J. MCDADE,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief

District Judge. (CA-97-212-5-BO)

Submitted: April 16, 1998 Decided: May 4, 1998

Before WILKINS and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mack Lee Nichols, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order granting

Appellee's motion for summary judgment and denying relief on his

petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. Nichols v. McDade, No. CA-97-212-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Jan. 13,

1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# EUR-Lex - 12002M030 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 12002M030

**Treaty on European Union (Nice consolidated version) - Title VI: Provisions on police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters - Article 30 - Article K.2 - EU Treaty (Maastricht 1992) - **

*
Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0022 - 0022 Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0163 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 191 , 29/07/1992 P. 0061 *

Treaty on European Union (Nice consolidated version)

Title VI: Provisions on police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters

Article 30

Article K.2 - EU Treaty (Maastricht 1992)

Article 30

1. Common action in the field of police cooperation shall include:

(a) operational cooperation between the competent authorities, including the police, customs and other specialised law enforcement services of the Member States in relation to the prevention, detection and investigation of criminal offences;

(b) the collection, storage, processing, analysis and exchange of relevant information, including information held by law enforcement services on reports on suspicious financial transactions, in particular through Europol, subject to appropriate provisions on the protection of personal data;

(c) cooperation and joint initiatives in training, the exchange of liaison officers, secondments, the use of equipment, and forensic research;

(d) the common evaluation of particular investigative techniques in relation to the detection of serious forms of organised crime.

2. The Council shall promote cooperation through Europol and shall in particular, within a period of five years after the date of entry into force of the Treaty of Amsterdam:

(a) enable Europol to facilitate and support the preparation, and to encourage the coordination and carrying out, of specific investigative actions by the competent authorities of the Member States, including operational actions of joint teams comprising representatives of Europol in a support capacity;

(b) adopt measures allowing Europol to ask the competent authorities of the Member States to conduct and coordinate their investigations in specific cases and to develop specific expertise which may be put at the disposal of Member States to assist them in investigating cases of organised crime;

(c) promote liaison arrangements between prosecuting/investigating officials specialising in the fight against organised crime in close cooperation with Europol;

(d) establish a research, documentation and statistical network on cross-border crime.
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 193 / Thursday, October 5, 2006 / Notices 58841 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Office of the Secretary 

[Transmittal No. 06–33] 

36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification 

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense 

Security Cooperation Agency. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is 

publishing the unclassified text of a 

section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. 

This is published to fulfill the 

requirements of section 155 of Public 

Law 104–164 dated 21 July 1996. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

J. Hurd, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 604–

6575. 

The following is a copy of a letter to 

the Speaker of the House of 

Representatives, Transmittal 06–33 with 

attached transmittal, policy justification, 

and Sensitivity of Technology. 

Dated: September 28, 2006. 

C.R. Choate, 

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison 

Officer, Department of Defense. 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–M 

mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES

58842 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 193 / Thursday, October 5, 2006 / Notices 


mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with NOTICESEN05OC06.035</GPH>
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 193 / Thursday, October 5, 2006 / Notices 58843 


mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with NOTICESEN05OC06.036</GPH>
58844 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 193 / Thursday, October 5, 2006 / Notices 


mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with NOTICESEN05OC06.037</GPH>
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 193 / Thursday, October 5, 2006 / Notices 58845 


mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with NOTICESEN05OC06.038</GPH>
58846 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 193 / Thursday, October 5, 2006 / Notices 


mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with NOTICESEN05OC06.039</GPH>
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 193 / Thursday, October 5, 2006 / Notices 58847 


mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with NOTICESEN05OC06.040</GPH>
58848 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 193 / Thursday, October 5, 2006 / Notices 


mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with NOTICESEN05OC06.041</GPH>
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 193 / Thursday, October 5, 2006 / Notices 58849 


mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with NOTICESEN05OC06.042</GPH>
58850 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 193 / Thursday, October 5, 2006 / Notices 

[FR Doc. 06–8509 Filed 10–4–06; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–C 


mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with NOTICESEN05OC06.043</GPH>
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18U.S.C. SECTION 1350








In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ace Marketing & Promotions, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Dean L. Julia, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/ DEAN L. JULIADEAN L. JULIAPRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER,May 13, 2011
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of

law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. This court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Filed 1/24/97 TENTH CIRCUIT
LAVERN ABNEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CITY OF TOPEKA, Defendant - Appellee. No. 96-3178 (D.C. No. 95-4013-SAC) (District of Kansas)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before BALDOCK , KELLY and LUCERO , Circuit Judges. Plaintiff Lavern Abney appeals the district court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of defendant City of Topeka. See Abney v. City of Topeka , No. 95-4013-SAC, 1996 WL 254604 (D. Kan. Apr. 16, 1 996). Mr. Abney alleges he was denied a promotion in violation of the Age D iscrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-634. Summary judgment is only appropriate if the “pleadi ngs, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if-2-

any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c). We review the grant of summary judgment de novo, ap plying the same standard used by the district court. Ball v. Renner , 54 F.3d 664, 665 (10th Cir. 1995). Upon careful consideration of the record, the brief s of the parties, the district court’s order, and applicable law, we affirm for su bstantially the reasons stated in the district court’s order. AFFIRMED. ENTERED FOR THE COURT

Carlos F. Lucero Circuit Judge
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 190 (Monday, October 2, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 58004]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-8387]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES


Meeting of the Judicial Conference Advisory Committee on Rules of 
Bankruptcy Procedure

AGENCY: Judicial Conference of the United States, Advisory Committee on 
Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Advisory Committee on Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure will 
hold a two-day meeting. The meeting will be open to public observation 
but not participation.

DATES: March 29-30, 2007.
    Time: 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Hilton Marco Island Beach Resort, Ballroom A, 560 South 
Collier Boulevard, Marco Island, FL 34145.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John K. Rabiej, Chief, Rules Committee 
Support Office, Administrative Office of the United States Courts, 
Washington, DC 20544, telephone (202) 502-1820.

    Dated: September 22, 2006.
John K. Rabiej,
Chief, Rules Committee Support Office.
[FR Doc. 06-8387 Filed 9-29-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 2210-55-M