alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

NOTICE OF LODGING OF PROPOSED CONSENT DECREE Case No. 10-cv-01954 CRB

IGNACIA S. MORENO

Assistant Attorney General

Environment and Natural Resources Division

ROCHELLE L. RUSSELL (Cal. Bar No. 244992)

Trial Attorney

U.S. Department of Justice

Environmental Defense Section

301 Howard Street, Suite 1050

San Francisco, CA 94150

Tel: (415) 744-6566

Fax: (415) 744-6476

Email: rochelle.russell@usdoj.gov

Attorney for Defendants

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

SIERRA CLUB and MEDICAL

ADVOCATES FOR HEALTHY AIR,

Plaintiffs,

v.

LISA P. JACKSON, in her official capacity as

Administrator of the United States

Environmental Protection Agency, and

JARED BLUMENFELD, in his official

capacity as Regional Administrator for Region

IX of the United States Environmental

Protection Agency, 

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 10-cv-01954 CRB

NOTICE OF LODGING OF 

PROPOSED CONSENT DECREE

Case3:10-cv-01954-CRB Document18 Filed11/08/10 Page1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

NOTICE OF LODGING OF PROPOSED CONSENT DECREE 2 Case No. 10-cv-01954 CRB

Defendants Lisa P. Jackson, in her official capacity as Administrator of the United States

Environmental Protection Agency, and Jared Blumenfeld, in his official capacity as 

Administrator for Region IX of the United States Environmental Protection Agency (collectively,

“EPA”), hereby lodge with the Court a proposed consent decree that contains the terms of a

proposed settlement of this action. See Attachment 1, Consent Decree. 

The proposed consent decree should not be signed or entered by the Court at this

time. Pursuant to section 113(g) of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7413(g), the EPA

Administrator must provide “a reasonable opportunity by notice in the Federal Register to

persons who are not named as parties or intervenors to the action or matter to comment in

writing” upon the proposed consent decree. Accordingly, EPA will publish in the Federal

Register a notice of the proposed consent decree and request public comments. After a

reasonable comment period, the EPA Administrator will promptly consider any written

comments received and, if none of the comments disclose facts or considerations which indicate

that the proposed consent decree is inappropriate, improper, inadequate, or inconsistent with the

requirements of the Clean Air Act, Defendants will move for entry of the decree. 

Respectfully submitted, 

Dated: November 8, 2010 IGNACIA S. MORENO

Assistant Attorney General

Environment and Natural Resources Division

 /s/ Rochelle L. Russell 

ROCHELLE L. RUSSELL

Attorney, Environmental Defense Section

United States Department of Justice

301 Howard Street, Suite 1050

San Francisco, CA 94105

Tel: (415) 744-6566

Email: rochelle.russell@usdoj.gov

Counsel for Defendants

Case3:10-cv-01954-CRB Document18 Filed11/08/10 Page2 of 2
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: 2012-NM-140-AD

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific 

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of 

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)
# EUR-Lex - 12007L/AFI/DCL/48 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12007L/AFI/DCL/48

**Treaty of Lisbon amending the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Community, signed at Lisbon, 13 December 2007 - B. Declarations concerning Protocols annexed to the Treaties - 48. Declaration concerning the Protocol on the position of Denmark **

*
Official Journal 306 , 17/12/2007 P. 0265 - 0265 *

48. Declaration concerning the Protocol on the position of Denmark

The Conference notes that with respect to legal acts to be adopted by the Council acting alone or jointly with the European Parliament and containing provisions applicable to Denmark as well as provisions not applicable to Denmark because they have a legal basis to which Part I of the Protocol on the position of Denmark applies, Denmark declares that it will not use its voting right to prevent the adoption of the provisions which are not applicable to Denmark.

Furthermore, the Conference notes that on the basis of the Declaration by the Conference on Article 188 R, Denmark declares that Danish participation in actions or legal acts pursuant to Article 188 R will take place in accordance with Part I and Part II of the Protocol on the position of Denmark.

--------------------------------------------------
Comment Info: ================= General Comment:River Hawk UAV, LLC - Exemption/Rulemaking
From: Sue Rose

To: Cheryl Hemsley

Cc: Robert Knop; Neven Stipanovic; Terrell Stansbury

Subject: RE: AO 2024-03 (PoliticalMeetings.com) Extension of deadline requested

Date: Monday, March 25, 2024 4:47:33 PM

Of course Chery, that would fine!

Sue

From: Cheryl Hemsley <chemsley@fec.gov>

Sent: Monday, March 25, 2024 2:44:53 PM

To: Sue Rose <srose@politicalmeetings.com>

Cc: Robert Knop <rknop@fec.gov>; Neven Stipanovic <NStipanovic@fec.gov>; Terrell Stansbury

<TStansbury@fec.gov>

Subject: AO 2024-03 (PoliticalMeetings.com) Extension of deadline requested

Sue,

We have been asked by a Commissioner to seek from you an extension of the current April 1,

2024, 60-day deadline for your advisory opinion request (AO 2024-03

(PoliticalMeetings.com)). Would you be amenable to an extension to April 19, 2024, so that

the Commission can consider your advisory opinion request during the Commission’s April 18

Open Meeting?

Best Regards,

Cheryl Hemsley

Attorney

Policy/OGC

Federal Election Commission

Received by OGC on Mar. 25, 2024
Case 16-28521 Doc 1 Filed 09/06/16 Entered 09/06/16 15:18:16 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 9
Case 16-28521 Doc 1 Filed 09/06/16 Entered 09/06/16 15:18:16 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 9
Case 16-28521 Doc 1 Filed 09/06/16 Entered 09/06/16 15:18:16 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 9
Case 16-28521 Doc 1 Filed 09/06/16 Entered 09/06/16 15:18:16 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 9
Case 16-28521 Doc 1 Filed 09/06/16 Entered 09/06/16 15:18:16 Desc Main

 Document Page 5 of 9
Case 16-28521 Doc 1 Filed 09/06/16 Entered 09/06/16 15:18:16 Desc Main

 Document Page 6 of 9
Case 16-28521 Doc 1 Filed 09/06/16 Entered 09/06/16 15:18:16 Desc Main

 Document Page 7 of 9
Case 16-28521 Doc 1 Filed 09/06/16 Entered 09/06/16 15:18:16 Desc Main

 Document Page 8 of 9
Case 16-28521 Doc 1 Filed 09/06/16 Entered 09/06/16 15:18:16 Desc Main

 Document Page 9 of 9
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsIndependent Orbiter Assessment (IOA): Assessment of the mechanical actuation subsystem, volume 2The results of the Independent Orbiter Assessment (IOA) of the Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) and Critical Items List (CIL) are presented. The IOA approach features a top-down analysis of the hardware to determine draft failure modes, criticality, and potential critical items. To preserve independence, this analysis was accomplished without reliance upon the results contained within the NASA FMEA/CIL documentation. The IOA results were then compared to the proposed Post 51-L NASA FMEA/CIL baseline that was available. A resolution of each discrepancy from the comparison was provided through additional analysis as required. These discrepancies were flagged as issues, and recommendations were made based on the FMEA data available at the time. This report documents the results of that comparison for the Orbiter Mechanical Actuation System (MAS) hardware. Specifically, the MAS hardware consists of the following components: Air Data Probe (ADP); Elevon Seal Panel (ESP); External Tank Umbilical (ETU); Ku-Band Deploy (KBD); Payload Bay Doors (PBD); Payload Bay Radiators (PBR); Personnel Hatches (PH); Vent Door Mechanism (VDM); and Startracker Door Mechanism (SDM). Criticality was assigned based upon the severity of the effect for each failure mode. Volume 2 continues the presentation of IOA analysis worksheets and contains the potential critical items list, detailed analysis, and NASA FMEA/CIL to IOA worksheet cross reference and recommendations.Document ID19900001637Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsBradway, M. W.*(McDonnell-Douglas Astronautics Co. Houston, TX, United States)*Slaughter, W. T.*(McDonnell-Douglas Astronautics Co. Houston, TX, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateMarch 7, 1988Subject CategorySpace TransportationReport/Patent NumberREPT-1.0-WP-VA88003-09-VOL-2NASA-CR-185527-VOL-2NAS 1.26:185527-VOL-2Accession Number90N10953Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS9-17650Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900001637.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 19-1004V

UNPUBLISHED

JASON ROSENBERG,

 Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES,

 Respondent.

Chief Special Master Corcoran 

Filed: December 15, 2020

Special Processing Unit (SPU);

Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;

Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;

Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine 

Administration (SIRVA)

Leah VaSahnja Durant, Law Offices of Leah V. Durant, PLLC, Washington, DC, for 

petitioner.

Ryan Daniel Pyles, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

On July 15, 2019, Jason Rosenberg filed a petition for compensation under the 

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.

2

(the 

“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that he suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine 

administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine administered on 

September 29, 2018. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit 

of the Office of Special Masters.

On December 14, 2020, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he

concedes that Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) 

Report at 1. Specifically, Respondent has concluded that “[P]etitioner’s claim meets the 

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required 

to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-Government Act 

of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government 

Services). This means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance 

with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, 

the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that 

the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease 

of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa 

(2012).
2

Table criteria for SIRVA.” Id. at 3. Respondent further agrees that the records show that 

the case was timely filed; that the vaccine was received in the United States; and that 

Petitioner satisfies the statutory severity requirement by suffering the residual effects or 

complications of his injury for more than six months after vaccine administration. Id.

In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that 

Petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Chief Special Master
# EUR-Lex - 12005SAN07/08 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12005SAN07/08

**Act concerning the conditions of accession of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania and the adjustments to the Treaties on which the European Union is founded - Annex VII:List referred to in Article 23 of the Act of Accession: transitional measures, Romania - 8.Energy **

*
Official Journal L 157 , 21/06/2005 P. 0330 - 0330 *

8. ENERGY

31968 L 0414: Council Directive 68/414/EEC of 20 December 1968 imposing an obligation on Member States of the EEC to maintain minimum stocks of crude oil and/or petroleum products (OJ L 308, 23.12.1968, p. 14), as last amended by:

- 31998 L 0093: Council Directive 98/93/EC of 14.12.1998 (OJ L 358, 31.12.1998, p. 100).

By way of derogation from Article 1(1) of Directive 68/414/EEC, the minimum level of stocks of petroleum products shall not apply in Romania until 31 December 2011. Romania shall ensure that its minimum level of stocks of petroleum products corresponds, for each of the categories of petroleum products listed in Article 2, to at least the following number of days' average daily internal consumption as defined in Article 1(1):

- 68,75 days by 1 January 2007;

- 3 days by 31 December 2007;

- 77,25 days by 31 December 2008;

- 81,5 days by 31 December 2009;

- 85,45 days by 31 December 2010;

- 90 days by 31 December 2011.

--------------------------------------------------
§ 1237.10 How must agencies manage their audiovisual, cartographic, and related records? Each Federal agency must manage its audiovisual, cartographic and related records as required in parts 1220 through 1235. In addition, agencies must: ( a ) Prescribe the types of audiovisual, cartographic, and related records to be created and maintained. (See § 1235.42 of this subchapter for transfer requirements for permanent audiovisual records.)
( b ) Create and maintain current inventories showing the location of all generations of audiovisual records and all cartographic and related records, especially those not maintained centrally by the agency.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

In re: 

Erskine Dudley

Debtor(s)

Case No. 16 B 28870

CHAPTER 13 STANDING TRUSTEE’S FINAL REPORT AND ACCOUNT

Marilyn O. Marshall, chapter 13 trustee, submits the following Final Report and Account 

of the administration of the estate pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1302(b)(1). The trustee declares as 

follows:

1) The case was filed on 09/09/2016.

2) The plan was confirmed on NA .

3) The plan was modified by order after confirmation pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1329 on

NA .

4) The trustee filed action to remedy default by the debtor in performance under the plan 

on NA .

5) The case was Dismissed on 10/20/2016.

6) Number of months from filing to last payment: 0.

7) Number of months case was pending: 4.

8) Total value of assets abandoned by court order: NA .

9) Total value of assets exempted: NA .

10) Amount of unsecured claims discharged without payment: $0.00.

11) All checks distributed by the trustee relating to this case have cleared the bank.

UST Form 101-13-FR-S (9/1/2009)

Case 16-28870 Doc 19 Filed 12/27/16 Entered 12/27/16 17:48:07 Desc Page 1

 of 3
Receipts:

Total paid by or on behalf of the debtor $0.00

Less amount refunded to debtor $0.00

NET RECEIPTS: $0.00

Expenses of Administration:

Attorney’s Fees Paid Through the Plan $0.00

Court Costs $0.00

Trustee Expenses & Compensation $0.00

Other $0.00

TOTAL EXPENSES OF ADMINISTRATION: $0.00

Attorney fees paid and disclosed by debtor: $0.00

Scheduled Creditors:

Creditor

Name Class

Claim

Scheduled

Claim

Asserted

Claim

Allowed

Int.

Paid

Principal

Paid

Summary of Disbursements to Creditors:

Secured Payments:

Mortgage Ongoing

Mortgage Arrearage

Debt Secured by Vehicle

All Other Secured

TOTAL SECURED:

Priority Unsecured Payments:

Domestic Support Arrearage

Domestic Support Ongoing

All Other Priority

TOTAL PRIORITY:

GENERAL UNSECURED PAYMENTS:

Claim

Allowed

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

Principal

Paid

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

Interest

Paid

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

UST Form 101-13-FR-S (9/1/2009)

Case 16-28870 Doc 19 Filed 12/27/16 Entered 12/27/16 17:48:07 Desc Page 2

 of 3
Disbursements:

Expenses of Administration $0.00

Disbursements to Creditors $0.00

TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS : $0.00

12) The trustee certifies that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 5009, 

the estate has been fully administered, the foregoing summary is true and complete, and all 

administrative matters for which the trustee is responsible have been completed. The trustee 

requests a final decree be entered that discharges the trustee and grants such other relief as may 

be just and proper.

Dated: 12/27/2016

STATEMENT: This Unified Form is associated with an open bankruptcy case, therefore, Paperwork Reduction 

Act exemption 5 C.F.R. § 1320.4(a)(2) applies.

By:/s/ Marilyn O. Marshall

Trustee

UST Form 101-13-FR-S (9/1/2009)

Case 16-28870 Doc 19 Filed 12/27/16 Entered 12/27/16 17:48:07 Desc Page 3

 of 3
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20463

BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

In the Matter of

MA4Trump 

Dianna Ploss

)

) 

) 

) 

) 

MUR 7591R 

STATEMENT OF REASONS OF CHAIRMAN ALLEN J. DICKERSON, VICE CHAIR 

STEVEN T. WALTHER, COMMISSIONER SHANA M. BROUSSARD, 

COMMISSIONER SEAN J. COOKSEY, COMMISSIONER JAMES E. “TREY” 

TRAINOR, III, AND COMMISSIONER ELLEN L. WEINTRAUB

This matter involves allegations that the organization MA4Trump, which held itself out 

as being founded and operated by Boston area radio host Dianna Ploss, solicited and spent funds 

for various events supporting the re-election of President Donald J. Trump in 2020 but failed to 

register and report as a political committee.1 The Complaint also alleges that MA4Trump 

improperly held itself out as an authorized candidate committee by using Trump’s name, and that 

it failed to use the required disclaimer in a newspaper advertisement.2 

 The information presently available indicates that MA4Trump’s events were not 

particularly well attended and that the group’s spending was relatively minimal.3 In addition, 

there is no record of the group being active beyond the 2020 election.4

 In light of these 

circumstances, as well as the many other matters on our docket, we concluded that it would not 

be an efficient use of the Commission’s resources to investigate or otherwise continue to pursue 

this matter. Accordingly, we voted to exercise prosecutorial discretion and dismiss this matter 

pursuant to Heckler v. Chaney, 470 U.S. 821 (1985).5

1

 MUR 7591, Compl. at 1 (Apr. 3, 2019).

2

 Id. 

3

 As identified in the First General Counsel’s Report (“FGCR”), MA4Trump’s Facebook page, which has 

been shut down and is no longer accessible, contained an “Events” page showing multiple past events. FGCR at 5-

6. MA4TRUMP FACEBOOK PAGE, formerly available at https://www.facebook.com/MA4Trump/ (last visited Dec. 

17, 2019). MA4Trump was identified as the host of five events in 2019; the event pages showed that RSVPs for

these five MA4Trump events ranged from 13 to 78 people. The event pages also reported ticket prices for some of 

the events set at $30 (Apr. 26, 2019) and $35 (Jan. 27, 2019). 

4

 Screen captures at The Internet Archive show that Ploss’s website no longer carried references to 

MA4Trump as of February 25, 2021. See, e.g. THE INTERNET ARCHIVE/WAYBACK MACHINE /DIANNA PLOSS 

WEBSITE, http://web.archive.org/web/20210225014328/https://diannaploss.com/ (last visited Apr. 18, 2022). 

5

 Certification, MUR 7591R (MA4Trump, et al.) (Mar. 22, 2022) (recording the Commission’s vote to 

dismiss the allegations pursuant to Heckler v. Chaney and close the file).

MUR7591R00035
MUR 7591R (MA4Trump, et al.) 

Statement of Reasons Page 2 of 2 

April 21, 2022

Date

April 20, 2022 

Date Steven T. Walther 

Vice Chair

April 20, 2022

Date Shana M. Broussard 

Commissioner

April 22, 2022 

 Date Sean J. Cooksey 

Commissioner

April 22, 2022 

 Date James E. “Trey” Trainor, III 

Commissioner

April 22, 2022 

 Date Ellen L. Weintraub 

Commissioner

Allen J. Dickerson 

Chairman

MUR7591R00036
```

[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 188 (Thursday, September 28, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 57009]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-8365]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[File No. 500-1]

In the Matter of China Energy Savings Technology, Inc.; Order of 
Suspension of Trading

September 26, 2006.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is 
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of 
China Energy Savings Technology, Inc. (``China Energy''), a Nevada 
corporation headquartered in Hong Kong, which trades in the over-the-
counter market under the symbol ``CESV''.
    Questions have arisen regarding the accuracy and completeness of 
information contained in China Energy's press releases and public 
filings with the Commission concerning, among other things: (i) The 
company's purported ownership and control of its sole asset, Shenzhen 
Dicken Industrial Development, a manufacturer of energy saving devices 
located and doing business in the People's Republic of China; and (ii) 
the existence and/or identity of the company's purported former 
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Sun Li.
    The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the 
protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the 
securities of the above-listed company.
    Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the 
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the above-listed 
company is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. edt, September 26, 
2006, through 11:59 p.m. edt, on October 10, 2006.

    By the Commission.
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 06-8365 Filed 9-26-06; 11:44 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
```
# EUR-Lex - 12004V164 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V164

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART III — THE POLICIES AND FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - TITLE III — INTERNAL POLICIES AND ACTION - CHAPTER I — INTERNAL MARKET - Section 5 — Rules on competition - Subsection 1 — Rules applying to undertakings - Article III-164 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0070 - 0070 *

Article III-164

Until the entry into force of the European regulations adopted pursuant to Article III-163, the authorities in Member States shall rule on the admissibility of agreements, decisions and concerted practices and on abuse of a dominant position in the internal market in accordance with their national law and Article III-161, in particular paragraph 3, and Article III-162.

--------------------------------------------------