alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EUR-Lex - 12007P052 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12007P052

**Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - TITLE VII - GENERAL PROVISIONS GOVERNING THE INTERPRETATION AND APPLICATION OF THE CHARTER - Article 52 - Scope and interpretation of rights and principles **

*
Official Journal 303 , 14/12/2007 P. 0013 - 0014 *

Article 52

Scope and interpretation of rights and principles

1. Any limitation on the exercise of the rights and freedoms recognised by this Charter must be provided for by law and respect the essence of those rights and freedoms. Subject to the principle of proportionality, limitations may be made only if they are necessary and genuinely meet objectives of general interest recognised by the Union or the need to protect the rights and freedoms of others.

2. Rights recognised by this Charter for which provision is made in the Treaties shall be exercised under the conditions and within the limits defined by those Treaties.

3. In so far as this Charter contains rights which correspond to rights guaranteed by the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, the meaning and scope of those rights shall be the same as those laid down by the said Convention. This provision shall not prevent Union law providing more extensive protection.

4. In so far as this Charter recognises fundamental rights as they result from the constitutional traditions common to the Member States, those rights shall be interpreted in harmony with those traditions.

5. The provisions of this Charter which contain principles may be implemented by legislative and executive acts taken by institutions, bodies, offices and agencies of the Union, and by acts of Member States when they are implementing Union law, in the exercise of their respective powers. They shall be judicially cognisable only in the interpretation of such acts and in the ruling on their legality.

6. Full account shall be taken of national laws and practices as specified in this Charter.

7. The explanations drawn up as a way of providing guidance in the interpretation of this Charter shall be given due regard by the courts of the Union and of the Member States.

--------------------------------------------------
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-1751

MAURICE BETHEA,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

SOUTHEASTERN REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, a/k/a

Robeson County Memorial Hospital,

Incorporated, a/k/a Baker-Thompson Memorial

Hospital, Incorporated, a/k/a Southeastern

General Hospital, Incorporated, a/k/a

Southeastern Regional Medical Center,

Incorporated; BRUCE B. BERGSTRESSER,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior

District Judge. (CA-01-62-7-F)

Submitted: April 16, 2003 Decided: May 2, 2003

Before WILKINSON and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Daniel F. Read, Durham, North Carolina, for Appellant. James

Bernard Spears, Jr., Jerry Howard Walters, Jr., HAYNSWORTH,

BALDWIN, JOHNSON & GREAVES, L.L.C., Charlotte, North Carolina, for

Appellees.
2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Maurice Bethea appeals the district court’s order granting

summary judgment in favor of the Defendants, thereby dismissing his

complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. See Bethea v. Southeastern Regional Medical Center,

No. CA-01-62-7-F (E.D.N.C. June 6, 2002). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# EUR-Lex - 12005SP045 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12005SP045

**Protocol concerning the conditions and arrangements for admission of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania to the European Union - PART FIVE:PROVISIONS RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THIS PROTOCOL - TITLE I:SETTING UP OF THE INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES - Article 45 **

*
Official Journal L 157 , 21/06/2005 P. 0042 - 0042 *

Article 45

A national of each new Member State shall be appointed to the Commission as from the date of accession. The new Members of the Commission shall be appointed by the Council, by common accord with the President of the Commission, after consulting the European Parliament and in accordance with the criteria set out in Article I-26(4) of the Constitution.

The terms of office of the Members thus appointed shall expire at the same time as those of the Members in office at the time of accession.

--------------------------------------------------
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)



In connection with the Annual Report of Wells
Real Estate Fund IV, L.P. (the Registrant) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned, Leo F. Wells, III, Chief Executive Officer of
the corporate general partner of one of the General Partners of the Registrant, and Douglas P. Williams, Chief Financial Officer of the corporate general partner of one of the General Partners of the Registrant, hereby certify, pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that, to the best of our knowledge and belief:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                          
|--------------------------
|/s/    LEO F. WELLS, III  
|Leo F. Wells, III         
|Chief Executive Officer   
|March 30, 2005            
|                          
|/s/    DOUGLAS P. WILLIAMS
|Douglas P. Williams       
|Chief Financial Officer   
|March 30, 2005
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 191 (Tuesday, October 3, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 58436]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-8456]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Proposal Review Panel for Materials Research; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463 as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Proposal Review Panel for Materials Research (DMR) 
<greek-i>1203.
    Dates & Times: October 19, 2006; 7:45 a.m.-9 p.m. October 20, 
2006; 8 a.m.-4 p.m.
    Place: Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
    Type of Meeting: Part-Open.
    Contact Person: Dr. Maija M. Kukla, Program Director, Materials 
Research Science and Engineering Centers Program, Division of 
Materials Research, Room 1065, National Science Foundation, 4201 
Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230, Telephone (703) 292-4940.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning further support of the Materials Research Science and 
Engineering Center.

Agenda

Thursday, October 19, 2006

7:45 a.m.-8:45 a.m. Clossed--Briefing of Site Visit Panel.
8:45 a.m.-12 p.m. Open--Welcome (institutional representatives, 
etc.).
12 p.m.-1 p.m. Closed.
1 p.m.-4:45 p.m. Open--Technical research presentations and seed 
projects.
4:45 p.m.-6:15 p.m. Closed--Executive Session for Site Visit Team.
6:15 p.m.-7 p.m. Open--Poster Session (limited number of posters).
7 p.m.-9 p.m. Closed--Meeting of Site Panel.

Friday, October 20, 2006

8 a.m.-9 a.m. Closed--Executive session, Director's Response to 
Feedback.
9 a.m.-10:45 a.m. Open--Industrial Outreach and Other Collaborations 
(Weitz).
10:45 a.m.-4 p.m. Closed--Discussion with MRSEC Executive Committee.

    Reason for Closing: The work being reviewed may include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries and personal 
information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. 
These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: September 28, 2006.
Susanne Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 06-8456 Filed 10-2-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
*Pursuant to 5

th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

1

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 00-20475

 

JERRY L. LANDERS, ET AL,

 Plaintiffs,

L.B. FOSTER COMPANY,

Intervenor-Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

DAWSON CONSTRUCTION PLANT LIMITED,

Defendant-Appellee.

 

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Texas

(C.A. No. H-99-2516)

 

February 12, 2001

Before WIENER, BARKSDALE, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

In this diversity product-liability case, IntervenorPlaintiff-Appellant L.B. Foster Company (“Foster”) appeals the

district court’s dismissal of its claims against Defendant-Appellee

Dawson Construction Plant Limited (“Dawson”) for lack of personal

jurisdiction. Foster contends that Dawson, although a British
1See Helicopteros Nacionales de Columbia S.A. v. Hall, 466

U.S. 408, 413 (1984).

2

company with its principal place of business in the United Kingdom,

(1) purposefully established minimum contacts with Texas such that

the exercise of jurisdiction over Dawson comports with the due

process requirements of the Fourteenth Amendment, and that (2) the

exercise of such jurisdiction comports with traditional notions of

fair play and substantial justice.1 Having carefully considered

the record, the arguments and briefs of counsel, and the opinion of

the district court, we are satisfied that the motion to dismiss for

lack of personal jurisdiction was properly granted, and accordingly

we affirm the judgment of the district court for essentially the

same reasons set forth in its well-reasoned opinion.

AFFIRMED.
#### § 1220.16 What recorded information must be managed in accordance with the regulations in Subchapter B?

The requirements in Subchapter B apply to documentary materials that meet the definition of Federal records. See also Part 1222 of this subchapter.
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 04-3681

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

v. * Southern District of Iowa.

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Brandon Leroy Stockdall, *

*

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: May 10, 2005

Filed: May 19, 2005

___________

Before WOLLMAN, BRIGHT, and BYE, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Brandon Leroy Stockdall appeals from the sentence of 130 months of

imprisonment imposed following his plea of guilty to a charge of possession with

intent to distribute methamphetamine, a violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and

841(b)(1)(B). In light of the fact that Stockdall preserved his challenge to the

constitutionality of the United States Sentencing Guidelines, the government has

moved that the case be remanded for resentencing. The motion is granted, and the

case is remanded to the district court for resentencing in accordance with the holding

in United States v. Booker, 125 S. Ct. 738 (2005).

______________________________
#### § 1231.1 What is the authority for part 1231?

The authority for this part is 44 U.S.C. 2908.
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-83,401-01

IN RE BRIAN DOUG LAS HIL L, Relator

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF M ANDAM US CAUSE NO. 1238827-A IN THE 208TH DIS TRICT COURT

F ROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam . O R D E R Relator has filed a motion for leave to file an a pplication for a

writ of mandamus pursuant to the orig inal jurisdiction of this Court. I n it, he contends that he filed an application for a writ of habea s corpus in the 208th District Court of Har ris County , that more than 35 day s have elapse d, and that the application has not y et been forwa rded to this Court. Relator contends that the district court enter ed an or der de signating issues on June 4, 2013. Respondent, the J udg e of the 208th District Court of Har ris County , shall file a response with this Court by having the District Clerk submit the rec ord on such habea s corpus application. I n the alterna tive, Respondent may resolve the issues set out in the order desig nating issues and then have the District Clerk submit the rec ord on such application. I n either case , Respondent’s answe r shall2

be submitt ed wi t h i n 3 0 d ay s of the date of this order

. This application for leave to file a writ of mandamus will be held in abe y ance until R espondent ha s submitt ed her response .
Filed: Aug ust 26, 2015 Do not publish
# EUR-Lex - 12007L/AFI/DCL/54 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12007L/AFI/DCL/54

**Treaty of Lisbon amending the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Community, signed at Lisbon, 13 December 2007 - B. Declarations concerning Protocols annexed to the Treaties - 54. Declaration by the Federal Republic of Germany, Ireland, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Austria and the Kingdom of Sweden **

*
Official Journal 306 , 17/12/2007 P. 0268 - 0268 *

54. Declaration by the Federal Republic of Germany, Ireland, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Austria and the Kingdom of Sweden

Germany, Ireland, Hungary, Austria and Sweden note that the core provisions of the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community have not been substantially amended since its entry into force and need to be brought up to date. They therefore support the idea of a Conference of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States, which should be convened as soon as possible.

--------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

1050 First Street, NE 

Washington, DC 20463 

STATEMENT OF DESIGNATION OF COUNSEL 

Provide one form for each Respondent/Witness 

AR/MUR/RR/P-MUR# 8091 

E-MAIL: cela@fec.gov

-----------

Nrune of Counsel: -------------------------------

Ronnie L. Miller

Firm: Frost Brown Todd LLP 

Address: 201 N. Illinois Street, Suite 1900 

Indianapolis, IN 46244 

Office#: 317-237-3222 Fax#: 

Mobile#:

--------------

E-mail: RMiller@FBTlaw.com

The above-nruned individual and/or firm is hereby designated as my counsel and is authorized to receive any 

notifications and other communications from the Commission and to act on my behalf before the Commission. 

12/15/2022 

Date 

Debra Y. Maggart 

(Name - Please Print) 

RESPONDENT: Government Of The People / Debra Maggart, Treasurer 

Treasurer 

Title 

(Please print Committee Name/ Company Name/Individual Named in Notification Letter) 

Mailing Address: 150 3rd A venue S, Suite 1900

(Please Print) 

Nashville, TN 37201 

Home#: ------------

Office#: 615-743-6797 

Mobile#: 

Fax#: -------------

E-mail: dmaggart@civic-point.com

This form relates to a Federal Election Commission matter that is subject to the confidentiality provisions of 52 U.S.C. § 30109(aX12XA). 

This section prohibits making public any notification or investigation conducted by the Federal Election Commission without the express 

written consent of the person under investigation. 

Rev.2021 

MUR809100017
# EUR-Lex - 12006E287 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12006E287

**Treaty establishing the European Community (consolidated version) - Part Six - General and final provisions - Article 287 **

*
Official Journal C 321 E , 29/12/2006 P. 0172 - 0172 Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0147 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0294 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0075 - Consolidated version (EEC Treaty - no official publication available) *

Article 287

The members of the institutions of the Community, the members of committees, and the officials and other servants of the Community shall be required, even after their duties have ceased, not to disclose information of the kind covered by the obligation of professional secrecy, in particular information about undertakings, their business relations or their cost components.

--------------------------------------------------
Case 16-27496 Doc 5 Filed 08/26/16 Entered 08/26/16 15:51:03 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2
Case 16-27496 Doc 5 Filed 08/26/16 Entered 08/26/16 15:51:03 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2
§ 223.48 Restrictions on export and substitution of unprocessed timber. ( a ) Contracts for the sale of unprocessed timber from National Forest System lands located west of the 100th meridian in the contiguous 48 States and Alaska, awarded before August 20, 1990, shall include provisions implementing the Secretary's timber export and substitution regulations at subpart D of this part in effect prior to that data. Such contracts shall also require purchasers to: ( 1 ) Submit annually, until all unprocessed timber is accounted for, a certified report on the disposition of any unprocessed timber harvested from the sale including a description of unprocessed timber which is sold, exchanged or otherwise disposed of to another person and a description of the relationship with the other person;
( 2 ) Submit annually, until all unprocessed timber from the sale is accounted for, a certified report on the sale of any unprocessed timber from private lands in the tributary area which is exported or sold for export; and
( 3 ) Maintain records of all such transactions involving unprocessed timber and to make such records available for inspection and verification by the Forest Service for up to three (3) years after the sale is terminated.
( b ) Contracts for the sale of unprocessed timber from National Forest System lands located west of the 100th meridian in the contiguous 48 States, awarded on or after August 20, 1990, shall include provisions implementing the requirements of the Forest Resources Conservation and Shortage Relief Act of 1990 (16 U.S.C. 620 *et seq.).*
( c ) The reporting and recordkeeping procedures in this section constitute information collection requirements as defined in 5 CFR part 1320. These requirements have been approved by the Office of Management and Budget and assigned clearance number 0596-0021.
[56 FR 65842, Dec. 19, 1991]
Case 16-82016 Doc 1 Filed 08/24/16 Entered 08/24/16 11:48:34 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 10
Case 16-82016 Doc 1 Filed 08/24/16 Entered 08/24/16 11:48:34 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 10
Case 16-82016 Doc 1 Filed 08/24/16 Entered 08/24/16 11:48:34 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 10
Case 16-82016 Doc 1 Filed 08/24/16 Entered 08/24/16 11:48:34 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 10
Case 16-82016 Doc 1 Filed 08/24/16 Entered 08/24/16 11:48:34 Desc Main

 Document Page 5 of 10
Case 16-82016 Doc 1 Filed 08/24/16 Entered 08/24/16 11:48:34 Desc Main

 Document Page 6 of 10
Case 16-82016 Doc 1 Filed 08/24/16 Entered 08/24/16 11:48:34 Desc Main

 Document Page 7 of 10
Case 16-82016 Doc 1 Filed 08/24/16 Entered 08/24/16 11:48:34 Desc Main

 Document Page 8 of 10
Case 16-82016 Doc 1 Filed 08/24/16 Entered 08/24/16 11:48:34 Desc Main

 Document Page 9 of 10
Case 16-82016 Doc 1 Filed 08/24/16 Entered 08/24/16 11:48:34 Desc Main

 Document Page 10 of 10
§ 1238.12 What documentation is required for microfilmed records? Agencies must ensure that the microforms capture all information contained on the source documents and that they can be used for the purposes the source documents served. Microform records must be labeled and organized to support easy retrieval and use. Agencies must: ( a ) Arrange, describe, and index the filmed records to permit retrieval of any particular document or component of the records.
( b ) Title each microform roll or fiche with a titling target or header. For fiche, place the titling information in the first frame if the information will not fit on the header. At a minimum, titling information must include: ( 1 ) The title of the records;
( 2 ) The number or identifier for each unit of microform;
( 3 ) The security classification, if any; and
( 4 ) The name of the agency and sub-organization, the inclusive dates, names, or other data identifying the records to be included on a unit of microform.
( c ) Add an identification target showing the date of microfilming. When necessary to give the microform copy legal standing, the target must also identify the person who authorized the microfilming. Use ANSI/AIIM MS19 (incorporated by reference, see § 1238.5) for standards for identification targets.
Case 16-28724 Doc 1 Filed 09/08/16 Entered 09/08/16 11:09:51 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 9
Case 16-28724 Doc 1 Filed 09/08/16 Entered 09/08/16 11:09:51 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 9
Case 16-28724 Doc 1 Filed 09/08/16 Entered 09/08/16 11:09:51 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 9
Case 16-28724 Doc 1 Filed 09/08/16 Entered 09/08/16 11:09:51 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 9
Case 16-28724 Doc 1 Filed 09/08/16 Entered 09/08/16 11:09:51 Desc Main

 Document Page 5 of 9
Case 16-28724 Doc 1 Filed 09/08/16 Entered 09/08/16 11:09:51 Desc Main

 Document Page 6 of 9
Case 16-28724 Doc 1 Filed 09/08/16 Entered 09/08/16 11:09:51 Desc Main

 Document Page 7 of 9
Case 16-28724 Doc 1 Filed 09/08/16 Entered 09/08/16 11:09:51 Desc Main

 Document Page 8 of 9
Case 16-28724 Doc 1 Filed 09/08/16 Entered 09/08/16 11:09:51 Desc Main

 Document Page 9 of 9
§ 1150.11 Parties. ( a ) The term parties includes ( 1 ) any agency, state or local body, or other person named as a respondent in a notice of hearing or opportunity for hearing,
( 2 ) the Executive Director and
( 3 ) any person named as a party by order of the judge.
( b ) The Executive Director has the sole authority to initiate proceedings by issuing a citation under § 1150.42, on the basis of ( 1 ) a complaint from any person or
( 2 ) alleged violations coming to his/her attention through any means.
MUR804500011