alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1232.10 Where can a Federal agency transfer records for storage? Federal agencies may store records in the following types of records storage facilities, so long as the facilities meet the facility standards in 36 CFR part 1234. Records transferred to a records storage facility remain in the legal custody of the agency. ( a ) NARA Federal Records Centers. NARA owns or operates records centers for the storage, processing, and servicing of records for Federal agencies under the authority of 44 U.S.C. 2907. These NARA records centers include a National Personnel Records Center that contains designated records of the Department of Defense and the Office of Personnel Management and other designated records pertaining to former Federal civilian employees. A list of NARA Federal Records Centers is available from the NARA Web site at *http://www.archives.gov/locations/index.html .*
( b ) Records centers operated by or on behalf of one or more Federal agencies other than NARA.
( c ) Commercial records storage facilities operated by private entities.
[74 FR 51014, Oct. 2, 2009, as amended at 83 FR 13654, Mar. 30, 2018]
Exhibit 4.1


 


THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON


NEW YORK’S FIRST BANK-FOUNDED 1784 BY ALEXANDER HAMILTON


 


 


2 HANSON PLACE, 12TH FLOOR, BROOKLYN,
N.Y. 11217


 


 


 


August 4, 2020


 


Hennion & Walsh, Inc.


2001 Route 46, Waterview Plaza


Parsippany, New Jersey 07054


 


SmartTrust 487 (the “Fund”)


 


Dear Sirs:


The Bank of New York
Mellon is acting as trustee for the Fund, consisting of the unit investment trusts (the “Trusts”) included in
the Registration Statement relating to the Fund. We enclosed a list of the securities to be deposited in the Trusts on the date
hereof. The prices indicated therein reflect our evaluation of such securities as of close of business on August 3, 2020, in accordance
with the valuation method set forth in the applicable Standard Terms and Conditions of Trust and Trust Agreements. We consent to
the reference to The Bank of New York Mellon as the party performing the evaluations of the Trust securities in the Registration
Statement (No. 333-238288) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission with respect to the registration of the sale of the
Units of the Trusts and to the filing of this consent as an exhibit thereto.


 


	 	Very truly yours,
	 	 
	 	/s/ GERARDO CIPRIANO
	 	Gerardo Cipriano
	 	Vice President
From: Jonathan Peterson

To: Joanna Waldstreicher; Robert Knop

Cc: Ezra Reese; Emma Anspach; Jacquelyn Lopez

Subject: AOR 2024-05 Withdrawal of Questions 2 and 3

Date: Thursday, April 4, 2024 4:35:24 PM

Joanna and Bob,

On behalf of our client, Nevadans for Reproductive Freedom (“NFRF”), we write to inform the

Commission that NFRF no longer plans to engage in the activities proposed in questions 2 and 3 of

the pending advisory opinion request (AOR 2024-05). Because these questions now ask about

hypothetical activities under 11 CFR § 112.1(b), they no longer qualify as proper questions for the

Commission to consider in the advisory opinion context. Accordingly, NFRF withdraws questions 2

and 3 of AOR 2024-05.

Please confirm receipt of this email at your earliest convenience.

Jonathan Peterson

Elias Law Group LLP

202-987-4913

jpeterson@elias.law

CONFIDENTIAL: This email may contain privileged or confidential information and is for the sole use of the intended

recipient(s). Any unauthorized use or disclosure of this communication is prohibited. If you believe that you have received

this email in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete it from your system.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 5172 

To amend the National Child Protection Act of 1993 to ensure that businesses 

and organizations that work with vulnerable populations are able to 

request background checks for their contractors who work with those 

populations, as well as for individuals that the businesses or organizations 

license or certify to provide care for those populations. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 25, 2024 

Mr. DURBIN (for himself and Mr. HAWLEY) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the National Child Protection Act of 1993 to 

ensure that businesses and organizations that work with 

vulnerable populations are able to request background 

checks for their contractors who work with those populations, as well as for individuals that the businesses 

or organizations license or certify to provide care for 

those populations. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 5172 IS

1 SECTION 1. DEFINING ‘‘COVERED INDIVIDUAL’’ FOR PUR2 POSES OF BACKGROUND CHECKS UNDER 

3 THE NATIONAL CHILD PROTECTION ACT OF 

4 1993. 

5 Section 5(9)(B) of the National Child Protection Act 

6 of 1993 (34 U.S.C. 40104(9)(B)) is amended— 

7 (1) in clause (i)— 

8 (A) by inserting ‘‘, contracts with,’’ after 

9 ‘‘is employed by’’; 

10 (B) by inserting ‘‘, contract with,’’ after 

11 ‘‘be employed by’’; and 

12 (C) by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end; 

13 (2) by redesignating clause (ii) as clause (iii); 

14 (3) by inserting after clause (i) the following: 

15 ‘‘(ii) is employed by or volunteers 

16 with, or seeks to be employed by or volun17 teer with, an entity that is under contract 

18 with a qualified entity;’’; 

19 (4) in clause (iii), as so redesignated, by adding 

20 ‘‘or’’ at the end; and 

21 (5) by adding at the end the following: 

22 ‘‘(iv) is licensed or certified, or seeks 

23 to be licensed or certified, by a qualified 

24 entity;’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
# EUR-Lex - 12008E188 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008E188

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - PART THREE: UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS - TITLE XIX: RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT AND SPACE - Article 188 (ex Article 172 TEC) **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0131 - 0131 *

Article 188

(ex Article 172 TEC)

The Council, on a proposal from the Commission and after consulting the European Parliament and the Economic and Social Committee, shall adopt the provisions referred to in Article 187.

The European Parliament and the Council, acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and after consulting the Economic and Social Committee, shall adopt the provisions referred to in Articles 183, 184 and 185. Adoption of the supplementary programmes shall require the agreement of the Member States concerned.

--------------------------------------------------
# EUR-Lex - 11957E063 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11957E063

**TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY, PART TWO - FOUNDATIONS OF THE COMMUNITY, TITLE III - FREE MOVEMENT OF PERSONS, SERVICES AND CAPITAL, CHAPTER 3: SERVICES, ARTICLE 63 **

*

*

++++

ARTICLE 63

1 . BEFORE THE END OF THE FIRST STAGE , THE COUNCIL SHALL , ACTING UNANIMOUSLY ON A PROPOSAL FROM THE COMMISSION AND AFTER CONSULTING THE ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE ASSEMBLY , DRAW UP A GENERAL PROGRAMME FOR THE ABOLITION OF EXISTING RESTRICTIONS ON FREEDOM TO PROVIDE SERVICES WITHIN THE COMMUNITY . THE COMMISSION SHALL SUBMIT ITS PROPOSAL TO THE COUNCIL DURING THE FIRST TWO YEARS OF THE FIRST STAGE .

THE PROGRAMME SHALL SET OUT THE GENERAL CONDITIONS UNDER WHICH AND THE STAGES BY WHICH EACH TYPE OF SERVICE IS TO BE LIBERALISED .

2 . IN ORDER TO IMPLEMENT THIS GENERAL PROGRAMME OR , IN THE ABSENCE OF SUCH PROGRAMME , IN ORDER TO ACHIEVE A STAGE IN THE LIBERALISATION OF A SPECIFIC SERVICE , THE COUNCIL SHALL , ON A PROPOSAL FROM THE COMMISSION AND AFTER CONSULTING THE ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE ASSEMBLY , ISSUE DIRECTIVES , ACTING UNANIMOUSLY UNTIL THE END OF THE FIRST STAGE AND BY A QUALIFIED MAJORITY THEREAFTER .

3 . AS REGARDS THE PROPOSALS AND DECISIONS REFERRED TO IN PARAGRAPHS 1 AND 2 , PRIORITY SHALL AS A GENERAL RULE BE GIVEN TO THOSE SERVICES WHICH DIRECTLY AFFECT PRODUCTION COSTS OR THE LIBERALISATION OF WHICH HELPS TO PROMOTE TRADE IN GOODS .
§ 13.22 Renewal of permits. ( a ) *Application for renewal.* Applicants for renewal of a permit must submit a written application at least 30 days prior to the expiration date of the permit. Applicants must certify in the form required by § 13.12(a)(5) that all statements and information in the original application remain current and correct, unless previously changed or corrected. If such information is no longer current or correct, the applicant must provide corrected information.
( b ) *Renewal criteria.* The Service shall issue a renewal of a permit if the applicant meets the criteria for issuance in § 13.21(b) and is not disqualified under § 13.21(c).
( c ) *Continuation of permitted activity.* Any person holding a valid, renewable permit may continue the activities authorized by the expired permit until the Service acts on the application for renewal if all of the following conditions are met: ( 1 ) The permit is currently in force and not suspended or revoked;
( 2 ) The person has complied with this section; and
( 3 ) The permit is not a CITES document that was issued under part 23 of this subchapter (because the CITES document is void upon expiration).
( d ) *Denial.* The issuing officer may deny renewal of a permit to any applicant who fails to meet the issuance criteria set forth in § 13.21 of this part, or in the part(s) or section(s) specifically governing the activity for which the renewal is requested.
[54 FR 38148, Sept. 14, 1989, as amended at 72 FR 48446, Aug. 23, 2007]
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                           CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT
     PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(B) OR RULE 15D-14(B) AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of The Meridian Resource
Corporation (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Form 10-K"), I,
Michael J. Mayell, President of the Company, certify pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Date: March 15, 2006


                                        /s/ Michael J. Mayell
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Michael J. Mayell
                                        President
**EXHIBIT 23.2****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**     We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption, “Selected Financial Data,” and tothe incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-10261) pertaining tothe 1991 Stock Option Plan of Rochester Medical Corporation and the Registration Statement (FormS-8 No. 333-62592) pertaining to the 2001 Stock Incentive Plan of Rochester Medical Corporation ofour report dated October 22, 2004, with respect to the financial statements and schedule ofRochester Medical Corporation included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year endedSeptember 30, 2006, filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission./s/ Ernst & Young LLPMinneapolis, Minnesota
#### § 1222.1 What are the authorities for Part 1222?

The statutory authorities for this part are 44 U.S.C. 2904, 3101, 3102, and 3301.
Document

Exhibit 10.10
Amendment to
Outstanding 2019 and 2020 Restricted Stock Unit Awards
under the LivaNova PLC 2015 Incentive Award Plan


This amendment (the “Amendment”), dated as of June 15, 2020, hereby modifies each 2019 and 2020 service-based restricted stock unit (“RSU”) award agreement evidencing a currently outstanding RSU award under the LivaNova PLC 2015 Incentive Award Plan (as permitted pursuant to Section 11.7 of the LivaNova PLC 2015 Incentive Award Plan) as follows:


1.Section 2.2(d) of each outstanding RSU award agreement is hereby deleted and replaced with the following:


“In the event of a Change in Control that occurs following the Grant Date, the RSUs, to the extent not forfeited or otherwise vested immediately prior to such Change in Control, shall become fully vested immediately prior to, but subject to the consummation of, such Change in Control, subject to the Participant’s continuous employment with the Company or a Subsidiary through such Change in Control.”


2.Except as expressly amended by this Amendment, all terms and conditions of the Plan and the outstanding Awards thereunder shall remain in full force and effect.


3.This Amendment shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware, without reference to principles of conflict of laws.




LIVANOVA PLC






            
Name:  Trui Hebbelinck
Title:  Chief Human Resources Officer
Filed 7/10/01 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2001 ND 117

State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee

v.

Randy Scott Jensen, Defendant and Appellant

Nos. 20010012-20010014

Appeal from the District Court of Grand Forks County, Northeast Central Judicial District, the Honorable Debbie Gordon Kleven, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

David T. Jones (on brief), Assistant State's Attorney, and Tory J. Langemo (on brief), third-year law student, 124 S. 4th St., P.O. Box 5607, Grand Forks, ND 58206- 5607, for plaintiff and appellee.

Steven J. Simonson (argued), 421 DeMers Ave., Ste. 3, Grand Forks, ND 58201, for defendant and appellant.

State v. Jensen

Nos. 20010012-20010014

Per Curiam.

[¶1]Randy Scott Jensen appeals from criminal judgments after a jury found him guilty of Driving Under Revocation, Driving Under the Influence, and False Report to Law Enforcement.  Jensen argues he did not waive his right to a preliminary hearing on the charge of Driving Under the Influence (Case No. 18-98-K-01813), so that case should have been dismissed prior to trial.  Jensen further asserts the trial court erred by admitting into evidence his driving abstract, which he argues was irrelevant and cumulative because an officer had already testified Jensen’s driving privileges were revoked at the time of arrest.  Finally, Jensen contends that without the results of an Intoxilyzer test, the evidence was not sufficient to support his conviction for Driving Under the Influence.  We conclude Case No. 18-98-K-01813 should not have been dismissed prior to trial because a preliminary hearing was held concerning that case; the trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting Jensen’s driving abstract into evidence; and the evidence was sufficient to prove Jensen’s conviction, without administering an Intoxilyzer test, as the officer observed Jensen’s erratic driving, slow responses, red and watery eyes, slurred speech, odor of alcohol, belligerence, falling against the vehicle, and scoring the maximum number of six clues of intoxication on one field sobriety test.  We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3), (4).

[¶2]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Carol Ronning Kapsner

Dale V. Sandstrom

William A. Neumann

Mary Muehlen Maring
#### § 1202.6 Whom should I contact for Privacy Act matters at NARA?

Contact the NARA Privacy Act Officer, National Archives and Records Administration (NGC), Room 3110, 8601 Adelphi Road, College Park, MD 20740-6001, for guidance in making a Privacy Act request, or if you need assistance with an existing request. The Privacy Act Officer will refer you to the responsible system manager. Details about what to include in your Privacy Act request are discussed in Subpart C of this part.
§ 1251.6 How does the General Counsel determine whether to comply with a demand for records or testimony? The General Counsel may consider the following factors in determining whether or not to grant an employee permission to testify on matters relating to agency information, or permission to produce records in response to a demand: ( a ) NARA's compliance with the demand is required by federal law, regulation or rule, or is otherwise permitted by this part;
( b ) The purposes of this part are met;
( c ) Allowing such testimony or production of records would be necessary to prevent a miscarriage of justice;
( d ) NARA has an interest in the decision that may be rendered in the legal proceeding;
( e ) Allowing such testimony or production of records would assist or hinder NARA in performing its statutory duties;
( f ) Allowing such testimony or production of records would involve a substantial use of NARA resources;
( g ) Responding to the demand would interfere with the ability of NARA employees to do their work;
( h ) Allowing such testimony or production of records would be in the best interest of NARA or the United States;
( i ) The records or testimony can be obtained from the publicly available records of NARA or from other sources;
( j ) The demand is unduly burdensome or otherwise inappropriate under the applicable rules of discovery or the rules of procedure governing the case or matter in which the demand arose;
( k ) Disclosure would violate a statute, Executive Order or regulation;
( l ) Disclosure would reveal confidential, sensitive, or privileged information, trade secrets or similar, confidential commercial or financial information, otherwise protected information, or information which would otherwise be inappropriate for release;
( m ) Disclosure would impede or interfere with an ongoing law enforcement investigation or proceeding, or compromise constitutional rights;
( n ) Disclosure would result in NARA appearing to favor one litigant over another;
( o ) Disclosure relates to documents that were created by another agency;
( p ) A substantial Government interest is implicated;
( q ) The demand is within the authority of the party making it;
( r ) The demand is sufficiently specific to be answered; and
( s ) Other factors, as appropriate.
# EUR-Lex - 12006E301 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12006E301

**Treaty establishing the European Community (consolidated version) - Part Six - General and final provisions - Article 301 **

*
Official Journal C 321 E , 29/12/2006 P. 0177 - 0177 Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0152 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0299 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0078 - Consolidated version *

Article 301

Where it is provided, in a common position or in a joint action adopted according to the provisions of the Treaty on European Union relating to the common foreign and security policy, for an action by the Community to interrupt or to reduce, in part or completely, economic relations with one or more third countries, the Council shall take the necessary urgent measures. The Council shall act by a qualified majority on a proposal from the Commission.

--------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

Washington, DC 20463 

Statement of Designation of Counsel 

Provide one form forcnch RespondcnlAVitneiiS 

FAX 202-219-3923 

CASE; 6920 

Name of Counsel: William w Taylor TTT 

Firm: 7iipl-pi-man <;papHpr T T P 

Address; isnn M ShPPt NW, Suite 1000 Washington DC 70036 

Telephone: ( 202 ) 778-lRlQ .Fax:(_2Q2_)_i22zElM. 

The above named individual and/or firm is hereby designated as my counsel and is 

authorized to receive any notifications and other communications from the Commission 

and to act on my behalf before the Commission. 

Date 

RESPONDENT: 

(Commilicc Nnme/Company Name/Individual Named In Nolilicaiion Letter] 

MAILING ADDRESS: 

Signature Title 

Tc!cphonc:(H):_ (W): 

This form relates to a Election Commission matter that is subject to the conndcntiality provisions of 

52 U.S.C. § 30109(a)(12)(A}. This section prohibits making public any iiotirication or investigation 

conducted by the Federal Election Commission without the express written consent of the person 

receiving the noliflcation or the person with respect to whom the investigation is made.
# Map            Antarctic region.
# EUR-Lex - 12005SA048 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12005SA048

**Act concerning the conditions of accession of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania and the adjustments to the Treaties on which the European Union is founded - PART FIVE:PROVISIONS RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THIS ACT - TITLE I:SETTING UP OF THE INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES - Article 48 **

*
Official Journal L 157 , 21/06/2005 P. 0218 - 0218 *

Article 48

The Economic and Social Committee shall be enlarged by the appointment of 27 members representing the various economic and social components of organised civil society in Bulgaria and Romania. The terms of office of the members thus appointed shall expire at the same time as those of the members in office at the time of accession.

--------------------------------------------------
Order entered April 15, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-01735-CR

No. 05-13-01736-CR

No. 05-13-01737-CR

JAVIER A. MONTOYA-RODRIGUEZ, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 363rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. F12-56281-W, F12-56282-W, F13-58584-W

ORDER

The Court ORDERS court reporter Debi Harris to file, within FIFTEEN DAYS of the 

date of this order, a supplemental record containing State’s Exhibit no. 6, a DVD.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to court 

reporter Debi Harris and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE