alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C.

 

 March 5, 2024 

VIA CERTIFIED MAIL

Matthew Schonert

Eastpointe, MI 48021 

 RE: MUR 8045 

 Winfrey for Congress

Dear Mr. Schonert: 

This is in reference to the complaint you filed with the Federal Election Commission on 

July 22, 2022, concerning a lack of a disclaimer on Winfrey for Congress’s website. Based on 

that complaint and the circumstances of this matter, the Commission determined to dismiss this 

matter and close the file on February 28, 2024. 

 Documents related to the case will be placed on the public record within 30 days. See 

Disclosure of Certain Documents in Enforcement and Other Matters, 81 Fed. Reg. 50,702 

(Aug. 2, 2016). 

 The Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended, allows a complainant to seek 

judicial review of the Commission's dismissal of this action. See 52 U.S.C. § 30109(a)(8). 

 If you have any questions, please contact Matt Lupo, the attorney assigned to this matter, 

at (202) 694-1688 or mlupo@fec.gov. 

 Sincerely,

 

 Wanda D. Brown 

 Assistant General Counsel

MUR804500016
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20463

 

May 5, 2023 

 

VIA E-MAIL

kteasdale@ashby.law

Kate Teasdale

Ashby Law PC 

625 North Washington, Suite 325 

Alexandria, VA 22314 

 RE: MUR 8129 

Marcus Molinaro 

Molinaro for Dutchess 

Marc for Us Inc. and Lisa Lisker, Treasurer

 

Dear Ms. Teasdale: 

This is in response to a request for an extension to respond to the complaint filed in the above 

mentioned matter we received on May 5, 2023. After considering the circumstances in this matter, 

the Office of General Counsel has granted the requested extension. Accordingly, the response is due 

on or before the close of business June 8, 2023. You may contact me if you have any questions at

cela@fec.gov.

 Sincerely, 

 

 Kathryn Ross, Paralegal

 Complaints Examination and 

 Legal Administration 

MUR812900018
# EUR-Lex - 12005SP033 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12005SP033

**Protocol concerning the conditions and arrangements for admission of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania to the European Union - PART FOUR:TEMPORARY PROVISIONS - TITLE III:FINANCIAL PROVISIONS - Article 33 **

*
Official Journal L 157 , 21/06/2005 P. 0040 - 0040 *

Article 33

1. Without prejudice to future policy decisions, the overall commitment appropriations for structural actions to be made available for Bulgaria and Romania over the three-year period 2007‐2009 shall be as follows:

(EUR million, 2004 prices) |

| 2007 | 2008 | 2009 |

Bulgaria | 539 | 759 | 1002 |

Romania | 1399 | 1972 | 2603 |

2. During the three years 2007-2009, the scope and nature of the interventions within these fixed country envelopes shall be determined on the basis of the provisions then applicable to structural actions expenditure.

--------------------------------------------------
# EUR-Lex - 12002E203 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 12002E203

**Treaty establishing the European Community (Nice consolidated version) - Part Five: Institutions of the Community - Title I: Provisions governing the institutions - Chapter 1: The institutions - Section 2: The Council - Article 203 - Article 146 - EC Treaty (Maastricht consolidated version) - Article 146 - EEC Treaty **

*
Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0117 - 0117 Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0264 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0057 - Consolidated version (EEC Treaty - no official publication available) *

Treaty establishing the European Community (Nice consolidated version)

Part Five: Institutions of the Community

Title I: Provisions governing the institutions

Chapter 1: The institutions

Section 2: The Council

Article 203

Article 146 - EC Treaty (Maastricht consolidated version)

Article 146 - EEC Treaty

Article 203

The Council shall consist of a representative of each Member State at ministerial level, authorised to commit the government of that Member State.

The office of President shall be held in turn by each Member State in the Council for a term of six months in the order decided by the Council acting unanimously.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

MONITOR DESCRIPTION REPORT

Report Request ID: 804494 Report Code: AMP390 Nov. 1, 2010

Selection Criteria Page 1

User ID: FRX

State County Site Parameter POC City AQCR UAR CBSA CSA

EPA

Region Method Duration Begin Date End Date

32 031 0025 81102 1999 01 01 2003 02 28

GEOGRAPHIC SELECTIONS

SELECTED OPTIONS

MERGE PDF FILES

Option Type Option Value

YES

SORT ORDER

1

2

3

4

5

6

Order Column

STATE_CODE

COUNTY_CODE

SITE_ID

EPA_REGION

PARAMETER_CODE

POC

Tribal
Nov. 1, 2010

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

MONITOR DESCRIPTION REPORT

Page 1 of 1

Parameter Measured: 81102

Nevada

Monitor ID:

Date of Latest Collection: 20100625 Last Updated: 20100830

Owner: Washoe Co,NV Reno

Site Name:

Street Address: 684A STATE ROUTE 341, RENO NV 89521

CBSA: Reno-Sparks, NV

County: Washoe UAR: Reno, NV

Project Type: CONTINUOUS AIR MONITORING PROGRAM Dominant Source: MOBILE

Meas. Scale: NEIGHBORHOOD Location Setting: Suburban

Probe Location: TOP OF BUILDING Horizontal Distance (m): 0.0

Probe Height (m): 5.0 Surrogate?: Vertical Distance (m): 1.5

Sample Residence Time: Unrestricted Air FLow?: Y

NV RENO

Pollutant Area Name

Classified as not 

being a worst site 

monitor.

Worst Site Type

Community 

Monitoring Zone

Spatial 

Average Ind

Schedule

Exemption

Applicable

NAAQS Ind

20020101

Begin Date End Date

DATES OF OPERATION

GENERAL/BACKGROUND

Monitor Objective Type UAR Name CBSA Name CSA Name

REPORTING

COLLECTING

ANALYZING

REPORTING

PQAO

Agency Role

Washoe County District Health Department

Washoe County District Health Department

Washoe County District Health Department

Washoe County District Health Department

Washoe County District Health Department

Agency Name

20020401

20020101

20020101

20020101

20070101

Begin Date

20020331

End Date

AGENCY ROLES

SLAMS

Monitor Type

20020101

Begin Date End Date Action Type Action Reason

MONITOR TYPE INFORMATION

City:

MONITORING OBJECTIVES

POLLUTANT AREA INFORMATION

32-031-0025-81102-1
CLASSICA GROUP TECHNOLOGIES ITALIA, S.r.l.
                     Via Nagy 7, Pratissolo di Scandiano, RE
                Telephone -39 0522 76 70 34 Fax 39 0522 76 79 71


                                                            Ing. Giuseppe Ruozi
                                                            Ricerca e Sviluppo


                                 4 September 2003


The Classica Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
2400 Main Street
Suite #12
Sayreville, New Jersey 08872

Re:      Consent to use of my name and curriculum vita.

To whom it may concern:

The Classica Group, Inc. and its Subsidiaries ("the Company") have and are
hereby granted my permission to use my name, a description of my education, past
business activities, professional achievements and experience, and any other
facts concerning me and my relationship with the Company in any documents, press
releases, publications, oral or visual presentations, filings with governmental
authorities, or in any other manner or material whatsoever as they see fit.




/s/ Ing. Giuseppe Ruozi
----------------------------------
Ing. Giuseppe Ruozi
4-September-2003
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                          Sun-Times Media Group, Inc.
                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
                       As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906
                        of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

      In connection with the annual report of Sun-Times Media Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Cyrus F. Freidheim Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

Date: March 16, 2007

                                 /s/ Cyrus F. Freidheim Jr.
                                 ----------------------------------------------
                                 Name:  Cyrus F. Freidheim Jr.
                                 Title:  President and Chief Executive Officer

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Sun-Times Media Group, Inc. and will be retained by Sun-Times
Media Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
# EUR-Lex - 12005SA037 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12005SA037

**Act concerning the conditions of accession of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania and the adjustments to the Treaties on which the European Union is founded - PART FOUR:TEMPORARY PROVISIONS - TITLE IV:OTHER PROVISIONS - Article 37 **

*
Official Journal L 157 , 21/06/2005 P. 0216 - 0216 *

Article 37

If Bulgaria or Romania has failed to implement commitments undertaken in the context of the accession negotiations, causing a serious breach of the functioning of the internal market, including any commitments in all sectoral policies which concern economic activities with cross-border effect, or an imminent risk of such breach the Commission may, until the end of a period of up to three years after accession, upon motivated request of a Member State or on its own initiative, take appropriate measures.

Measures shall be proportional and priority shall be given to measures which least disturb the functioning of the internal market and, where appropriate, to the application of the existing sectoral safeguard mechanisms. Such safeguard measures shall not be invoked as a means of arbitrary discrimination or a disguised restriction on trade between Member States. The safeguard clause may be invoked even before accession on the basis of the monitoring findings and the measures adopted shall enter into force as of the first day of accession unless they provide for a later date. The measures shall be maintained no longer than strictly necessary and, in any case, shall be lifted when the relevant commitment is implemented. They may however be applied beyond the period specified in the first paragraph as long as the relevant commitments have not been fulfilled. In response to progress made by the new Member State concerned in fulfilling its commitments, the Commission may adapt the measures as appropriate. The Commission shall inform the Council in good time before revoking the safeguard measures, and it shall take duly into account any observations of the Council in this respect.

--------------------------------------------------
# EUR-Lex - 12004V117 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V117

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART III — THE POLICIES AND FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - TITLE I — PROVISIONS OF GENERAL APPLICATION - Article III-117 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0055 - 0055 *

Article III-117

In defining and implementing the policies and actions referred to in this Part, the Union shall take into account requirements linked to the promotion of a high level of employment, the guarantee of adequate social protection, the fight against social exclusion, and a high level of education, training and protection of human health.

--------------------------------------------------
#### McCaull-Dinsmore Company, appellee, v. Hans P. Nielson, appellant.

Filed September 26, 1913.

No. 17,228.

Appeal: Findings: Conflicting Evidence. A finding of the trial court, if sustained by sufficient evidence, in an action at law tried without a jury, will not be set aside on appeal, where the controverted issue was determined on substantially conflicting evidence.

Appeal from the district court for Adams county: Harry S. Dungan, Judge.

*Affirmed.*

*304
      *John M. Ragan,*for appellant.

*Tibbets, Morey & Fuller, contra.*

Rose, J.

Plaintiff’s claim consists of three items: Damages resulting from defendant’s failure to deliver at Minneapolis 2,500 bushels of wheat at 76| cents a bushel under a sale contract dated March 9, .1907, “thirty days’ shipment,” the time having been subsequently extended so that the bill of lading would reach plaintiff at Minneapolis before November 1, 1907, $331.20; overpayment for a former shipment, $20.44; protest fees for nonpayment of draft $2.50 — total $354.14. The first item only is controverted.

According to the petition defendant sold plaintiff 2,500 bushels of Avheat at 76|- cents a bushel, and Avas short in delivery to the extent of 1,522 bushels and 50 pounds, which plaintiff was compelled to purchase from another at the increased market price of 98 cents a bushel, thereby sustaining a loss of 21f- cents a bushel; the difference between the contract price and the market price amounting to $331.20. Defendant, in addition to a general denial, ansAvered that the extension agreement permitted him to ship the remainder of the wheat from Lexington, Nebraska, by Noa’ember 1, 1907, and that he had the wheat on hand there and was engaged in loading it October 31,1907, when he received from plaintiff a telegram stating that it had canceled the contract and bought wheat to cover the remainder. The parties waived a jury and tried the case to the court. The findings and the judgment were in favor of plaintiff, and defendant has appealed.

The terms of the extension agreement were the controlling issues in the case. Was the bill of lading to reach plaintiff a.t Minneapolis before it purchased wheat to cover defendant’s shortage in delivery? The findings are in favor of plaintiff, but defendant argues they are not sustained by sufficient evidence. Though íavo abstracts’' have been filed, the bill of exceptions has been examined *305to determine the merits of tlie controversy. There is evidence sufficient to sustain the agreement as pleaded by plaintiff. As thus proved, defendant did not comply with its terms. The damages are established. The evidence is conflicting, and the case falls within the rule which makes the findings of the trial court conclusive.

Affirmed.

Barnes, Fawoett and Hamer, JJ., not sitting.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-2539
ROBERT WALTER WOLTZ, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus SHIRLEY S. CHATER, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Walter E. Black, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-94-3599-B) Submitted: January 11, 1996 Decided: January 23, 1996 Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert Walter Woltz, Appellant Pro Se. Lynne Ann Battaglia, United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland; Claire S. Hoffman, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing his case for want of prosecution and for failing to keep the court informed of his change in address. We have reviewed the record andthe district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Woltz v. Chater , No. CA-95-3599-B (D. Md. May 4, 1995). We dispense withoral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### § 13.1109 Off-road vehicle use in Glacier Bay National Preserve.

The use of off-road vehicles is authorized only on designated routes and areas in Glacier Bay National Preserve. The use of off-road vehicles in all other areas in Glacier Bay National Preserve is prohibited. A map of designated routes and areas is available at park headquarters.

[73 FR 3186, Jan. 17, 2008]
§ 1275.60 Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests. ( a ) The Archivist will process Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests for access to only those materials within the Presidential historical materials that are identifiable by an archivist as records of an agency as defined in § 1275.16(f). The Archivist will process these requests in accordance with the FOIA regulations set forth in 36 CFR part 1250, NARA Records Subject to FOIA.
( b ) In order to allow NARA archivists to devote as much time and effort as possible to the processing of materials for general public access, the Archivist will not process those FOIA requests where the requester can reasonably obtain the same materials through a request directed to an agency (as defined in § 1275.16(f)), unless the requester demonstrates that he or she has unsuccessfully sought access from that agency or its successor in law or function.
Case 16-30270    Doc 36    Filed 05/11/17    Entered 05/11/17 17:00:50    Desc Main Document      Page 1 of 7

Case 16-30270    Doc 36    Filed 05/11/17    Entered 05/11/17 17:00:50    Desc Main Document      Page 2 of 7

Case 16-30270    Doc 36    Filed 05/11/17    Entered 05/11/17 17:00:50    Desc Main Document      Page 3 of 7

Case 16-30270    Doc 36    Filed 05/11/17    Entered 05/11/17 17:00:50    Desc Main Document      Page 4 of 7

Case 16-30270    Doc 36    Filed 05/11/17    Entered 05/11/17 17:00:50    Desc Main Document      Page 5 of 7

Case 16-30270    Doc 36    Filed 05/11/17    Entered 05/11/17 17:00:50    Desc Main Document      Page 6 of 7

Case 16-30270    Doc 36    Filed 05/11/17    Entered 05/11/17 17:00:50    Desc Main Document      Page 7 of 7
§ 665.16 Vessel identification. ( a ) Applicability. Each fishing vessel subject to this part, except those identified in paragraph (e) of this section, must be marked for identification purposes, as follows: ( 1 ) A vessel that is registered for use with a valid permit issued under § 665.801 and used to fish on the high seas within the Convention Area as defined in § 300.211 of this title must be marked in accordance with the requirements at §§ 300.14 and 300.217 of this title.
( 2 ) A vessel that is registered for use with a valid permit issued under § 665.801 of this part and not used to fish on the high seas within the Convention Area must be marked in accordance with either: ( i ) Sections 300.14 and 300.217 of this title, or
( ii ) Paragraph (b) of this section.
( 3 ) A vessel that is registered for use with a valid permit issued under subparts B through E and subparts G through I of this part must be marked in accordance with paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) Identification. Each vessel subject to this section must be marked as follows: ( 1 ) The vessel's official number must be affixed to the port and starboard sides of the deckhouse or hull, and on an appropriate weather deck, so as to be visible from enforcement vessels and aircraft. Marking must be legible and of a color that contrasts with the background.
( 2 ) For fishing and receiving vessels of 65 ft (19.8 m) LOA or longer, the official number must be displayed in block Arabic numerals at least 18 inches (45.7 cm) in height, except that vessels in precious coral fisheries that are 65 ft (19.8 m) LOA or longer must be marked in block Arabic numerals at least 14 inches (35.6 cm) in height.
( 3 ) For all other vessels, the official number must be displayed in block Arabic numerals at least 10 inches (25.4 cm) in height.
( c ) The vessel operator must ensure that the official number is clearly legible and in good repair.
( d ) The vessel operator must ensure that no part of the vessel, its rigging, or its fishing gear obstructs the view of the official number from an enforcement vessel or aircraft.
( e ) The following fishing vessels are exempt from the vessel identification requirements in this section: ( 1 ) A vessel registered for use under a MHI non-commercial bottomfish permit that is in compliance with State of Hawaii bottomfish vessel registration and marking requirements.
( 2 ) A vessel less than 40 ft (12.2 m) LOA registered for use under a CNMI commercial bottomfish permit that is in compliance with CNMI bottomfish vessel registration and marking requirements.
[75 FR 2205, Jan. 14, 2010, as amended at 75 FR 3417, Jan. 21, 2010; 78 FR 33003, June 3, 2013; 78 FR 39583, July 2, 2013]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 22-0307

IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF:

JOSHUA ARNOLD BACON,

 Petitioner and Appellant,

 and

EMILY ANN BACON,

 Respondent and Appellee.

ORDER OF MEDIATOR APPOINTMENT

This appeal being subject to M.R.App.P. 7, and the parties having failed to jointly 

and timely select a mediator under M.R.App.P., 7(4),(c),

IT IS ORDERED THAT Elizabeth Brenneman, whose name appears next on the 

list of attorneys desiring appointment as mediators for Domestic Relations appeals which 

is maintained pursuant to M.R.App.P., 7(4)(e), is hereby appointed to conduct the 

mediation process required by M.R.App.P., 7(5), and 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the time periods set forth in M.R.App.P., 

7(5)(d) shall run from the date of this order of appointment.

A true copy of this order is being mailed to counsel of record for the parties, or to 

the parties individually if not represented by counsel, on the date hereof.

DATED this June 28, 2022.

Bowen Greenwood, Clerk of the Supreme Court

c: David B. Gallik, Robyn L. Weber, Elizabeth Brenneman

06/28/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0307
Exhibit
      32.02







CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350






The
      undersigned hereby certifies that to his knowledge the annual report of Sonic
      Corp. (the “Company”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
      date hereof fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such
      report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and
      results of operations of the Company.











Date:
                October 26, 2007/s/
                Stephen C. VaughanStephen
                C. Vaughan,Chief
                Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 193 (Thursday, October 5, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58830-58835]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-8507]



[[Page 58830]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Transmittal No. 06-54]


36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text 
of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to 
fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 
July 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. J. Hurd, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 604-
6575.
    The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives, Transmittal 06-54 with attached transmittal, policy 
justification, Sensitivity of Technology, and Section 620C(d).

    Dated: September 28, 2006.
C.R. Choate,
Alternate OSF Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M

[[Page 58831]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN05OC06.026


[[Page 58832]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN05OC06.027


[[Page 58833]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN05OC06.028


[[Page 58834]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN05OC06.029


[[Page 58835]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN05OC06.030

[FR Doc. 06-8507 Filed 10-4-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-C