alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-33 (e)
WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK

SERVICER'S REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE


Washington Mutual Bank (the "Asserting Party") is responsible for assessing
compliance as of December 31, 2006 and for the period from January 1, 2006
through December 31, 2006 (the "Reporting Period") of the Platform Transactions
(as defined below) with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of
Regulation AB (12 CFR part 229.1122), except the following criteria 1(iii) and
3(i)(C) and (D), which we have concluded are either (i) not applicable to the
servicing of the mortgage loans included in the Platform Transactions (each, a
"Mortgage Loan"), or (ii) performed by other parties with respect to the
Mortgage Loans (such criteria, after giving effect to the foregoing exceptions,
the "Applicable Servicing Criteria"). The transactions covered by this
Servicer's Assessment are those securitizations of pools of mortgage loans that
were completed on or after January 1, 2006 and prior to January 1, 2007 for
which the Asserting Party performed servicing functions set forth in Item
1122(d), that included one or more classes of publicly offered securities
registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the
Securities Act of 1933, and for which the Asserting Party has an obligation to
deliver an Assessment of Compliance pursuant to Item 1122 (the "Platform
Transactions").

The Asserting Party has assessed its compliance with the Applicable
Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period, using the Applicable Servicing
Criterion, and has concluded that it has complied in all material respects with
the Applicable Servicing Criteria with respect to the Mortgage Loans.

Deloitte & Touche LLP, a registered public accounting firm, has issued an
attestation report on the Asserting Party's assessment of compliance with the
Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period.

Dated: March 14, 2007

WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK


By:    /s/ H. John Berens
Name:  H. John Berens
Title: Senior Vice President
§ 13.26 Picnicking. Picnicking is authorized in park areas except where such activity is prohibited or otherwise restricted by the Superintendent. The public will be notified by one or more of the following methods— ( a ) Signs posted at conspicuous locations, such as normal points of entry or reasonable intervals along the boundary of the affected park locale;
( b ) Maps available in the office of the Superintendent and other places convenient to the public;
( c ) Publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the affected area; or
( d ) Other appropriate methods, including park Web sites, brochures, maps, and handouts.
§ 14.24 Showing as to citizenship required. ( a ) *Individuals.* An individual applicant applying for a right-of-way under any right-of-way act, except the Act of March 3, 1891 (26 Stat. 1101; 43 U.S.C. 946 *et seq.*), and the Act of January 13, 1897 (29 Stat. 484; 43 U.S.C. 952-955), as amended, must state whether he is native born or naturalized, and, if naturalized, the date of naturalization, the court in which naturalized, and the number of the certificate, if known. If citizenship is claimed by virtue of naturalization of the father, evidence of his naturalization, and that the applicant resided in the United States thereafter while a minor, should be furnished. Where the husband and the wife are native born and a statement to that effect is made, additional information as to the marital status is not required. In other cases, a married woman or widow must show the date of her marriage; a widow must show, in addition, the date of the death of her husband.
( b ) *Association of Individuals.* An application by an association, including a partnership, must be accompanied by a certified copy of the articles of association, if any; if there be none, the application must be made over the signature of each member of the association. Each member must furnish evidence of citizenship where it would be required if he were applying individually.
§ 223.115 Contract extensions. The term of any contract or permit shall not be extended unless the approving officer finds: ( a ) That the purchaser has diligently performed in accordance with contract provisions and an approved plan of operation; or
( b ) That the substantial overriding public interest justifies the extension.
*The HONORABLE ORTRIE D. SMITH, United States District Judge for the

Western District of Missouri, sitting by designation.

1The Honorable Harold D. Vietor, United States District Judge for the Southern

District of Iowa.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 99-1868

___________

Michael Patrick Gavin, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Southern District of Iowa.

Thomas Vilsack, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellee. *

___________

Submitted: December 16, 1999

Filed: December 22, 1999

___________

Before MURPHY and MAGILL Circuit Judges, and SMITH*, District Judge.

___________

PER CURIAM.

This matter is before the court on appeal from an order of the district court1

terminating a consent decree involving disciplinary segregation inmates at the Iowa

State Penitentiary. A class of inmates sued the governor of Iowa and various prison

officials about the conditions at the penitentiary, and a consent decree was entered in
-2-

1984 and a supplement approved in 1988. Subsequently Congress enacted the Prison

Litigation Reform Act, 18 U.S.C. §3626 (PLRA), which provides a mechanism for

terminating prospective relief granted in the absence of court findings that the relief was

narrowly drawn, that it extended no further than necessary to correct the violation of

a federal right, and that it was the least intrusive means necessary to correct the

violation. 18 U.S.C. §3626(b)(2). Iowa authorities then moved under PLRA to

terminate the consent decree in this case since the required findings had not been made.

Appellant Gavin, a member of the inmate class, argued in opposition to the

motion to terminate that the constitutional rights of inmates continue to be violated by

prison officials in a number of ways, including the use of strip cells and restraints and

restrictions on exercise. Prospective relief need not be terminated under PLRA if the

court makes the required findings "based on the record" and finds that prospective relief

remains necessary to correct current and ongoing violations of federal rights. 18 U.S.C.

§3626(b)(3). After an evidentiary hearing, the district court made specific findings

relevant to the motion to terminate. It specifically found that there were occasional

transgressions of the consent decree, but that they did not constitute "'current and

ongoing' violations of federal rights that require correction by continued prospective

relief." The court also found that the evidence "did not prove violations that are

pervasive and systematic" or "that prospective relief remains necessary to correct a

current and ongoing violation of the Federal right." The district court granted the

motion to terminate and then denied appellant's motion to alter or amend the judgment.

After reviewing the record and briefs, we agree with the District Court and

affirm without further discussion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
-3-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
# EUR-Lex - 12007P021 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12007P021

**Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - TITLE III - EQUALITY - Article 21 - Non-discrimination **

*
Official Journal 303 , 14/12/2007 P. 0007 - 0007 *

Article 21

Non-discrimination

1. Any discrimination based on any ground such as sex, race, colour, ethnic or social origin, genetic features, language, religion or belief, political or any other opinion, membership of a national minority, property, birth, disability, age or sexual orientation shall be prohibited.

2. Within the scope of application of the Treaties and without prejudice to any of their specific provisions, any discrimination on grounds of nationality shall be prohibited.

--------------------------------------------------
#### § 13.1302 Subsistence.

Subsistence uses are prohibited in, and the provisions of Subpart F of this part shall not apply to, Kenai Fjords National Park.
i'ruatr nf tqr luitrb ~tatrs NINETIETH CONGRESS 

FIRST SESSION-Began January 10, 1967 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Prepared under the di1'ection of FRANCIS R. VALEO, Secretary of the Senate 

By GERALD A. HACKETT, Executive Clerk 

Tuesday, March 14, 1967 

UNANIMOUS-CONSENT AGREEMENT 

Ordered, That, effective on Tuesday, March 14, 1967, at the conclusion of any routine morning business 

under order of the Senate, during the further consideration of the treaty Ex. D, 88th Cong., 2d sess., a consular 

convention with the U.S.S.R., debate on Executive Reservation No. 1, intended to be proposed by the Senator 

from South Dakota. (Mr. Mundt), shall be limited to 4 hours, to be equally divided and controlled by Mr. Mundt 

and the Senator from Arkansas (Mr. Fulbright); debate on Executive Reservation No.2, intended to be proposed 

by Mr. Mundt shall be limited to 6 hours, to be equally divided and controlled by Mr. Mundt and Mr. Fulbright; and debate on Executive Understanding No. 1, intended to be proposed by the Senator from Maine 

(Mrs. Smith), shall be limited to 1 hour, to be equally divided and controlled by Mrs. Smith and Mr. Fulbright. 

(Mart-A 9, 1967) 

TREATY 

Date of Calendar Treaty No-. SubJeCt Action of comzmttee report No. 

1967 

Mar. 3 11 Ex. D, 88th Cong., Consular convention with the U.S.S.R ______ Reported favorably by 

2d sess. Mr. Fulbright, from 

the Committee on 

Foreign Relations, 

with a printed report 

together with individ· 

ual views. (See Ex. 

Rept. No.4, 90th 

Cong., 1st seas.) 

65-022--67--No.21 U I. IOYIIt.H.IRT PltiKTING OPP'ICE IU:7
Date: l~sJ lUj , ~brzucutLJ l_q, .:2.01 ~ rJ:- .33 lfYYl 

Meeting: ~ £utl f eJ;rtf /«.taY\ J n )tduJ/-e_ 

Rule(s) Discussed: 'ft. ft~ Ofj fc do'\1.. ~-e_ 

Written Materials? Yes/No 

Name Organization 

T 

/( 

Phone Number 

7 ) - S6 1- I II y 

(( I ( 

I; I; I
§ 1223.18 Must vital records be in a particular form or format? ( a ) Vital records can be original records or copies of records. Consult NARA records management guidance on vital records at *http://www.archives.gov/records-mgmt/vital-records/index.html* for further information.
( b ) Records may be maintained on a variety of media including paper, magnetic tape, optical disk, photographic film, and microform. In selecting the media, agencies must ensure that equipment needed to read the specific media will be available following an emergency or disaster.
Total U.S. Exports to  Niger

Data in Thousand Dollars 

Data For  JUN. 1999

|Group                 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | Year to Date 6/1998 | Year to Date 6/1999 | % Change | Year Ending 6/1998 | Year Ending 6/1999 | % Change | % Share
|--------------------- | ---- | ---- | ---- | ---- | ------------------- | ------------------- | -------- | ------------------ | ------------------ | -------- | -------
|TEXTILES & APPAREL    | 1133 | 436  | 291  | 375  | 291                 | 173                 | -40.65   | 458                | 257                | -43.9    | 0      
|TEXTILE MILL PRODUCTS | 1133 | 429  | 291  | 346  | 266                 | 165                 | -37.87   | 432                | 245                | -43.3    | 0      
|Fabric                | 976  | 353  | 152  | 272  | 199                 | 130                 | -34.57   | 263                | 203                | -22.82   | 0
# Map            Japan administrative divisions.
#### §§ 228.20-228.39 [Reserved]
# EUR-Lex - 12008E/AFI/DCL/09 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008E/AFI/DCL/09

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - DECLARATIONS annexed to the Final Act of the Intergovernmental Conference which adopted the Treaty of Lisbon, signed on 13 December 2007 - A. DECLARATIONS CONCERNING PROVISIONS OF THE TREATIES - 9. Declaration on Article 16(9) of the Treaty on European Union concerning the European Council decision on the exercise of the Presidency of the Council **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0341 - 0342 *

9. Declaration on Article 16(9) of the Treaty on European Union concerning the European Council decision on the exercise of the Presidency of the Council

The Conference declares that the Council should begin preparing the decision establishing the procedures for implementing the decision on the exercise of the Presidency of the Council as soon as the Treaty of Lisbon is signed, and should give its political approval within six months. A draft decision of the European Council, which will be adopted on the date of entry into force of the said Treaty, is set out below:

Draft decision of the European Council

on the exercise of the Presidency of the Council

Article 1

1. The Presidency of the Council, with the exception of the Foreign Affairs configuration, shall be held by pre-established groups of three Member States for a period of 18 months. The groups shall be made up on a basis of equal rotation among the Member States, taking into account their diversity and geographical balance within the Union.

2. Each member of the group shall in turn chair for a six-month period all configurations of the Council, with the exception of the Foreign Affairs configuration. The other members of the group shall assist the Chair in all its responsibilities on the basis of a common programme. Members of the team may decide alternative arrangements among themselves.

Article 2

The Committee of Permanent Representatives of the Governments of the Member States shall be chaired by a representative of the Member State chairing the General Affairs Council.

The Chair of the Political and Security Committee shall be held by a representative of the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy.

The chair of the preparatory bodies of the various Council configurations, with the exception of the Foreign Affairs configuration, shall fall to the member of the group chairing the relevant configuration, unless decided otherwise in accordance with Article 4.

Article 3

The General Affairs Council shall ensure consistency and continuity in the work of the different Council configurations in the framework of multiannual programmes in cooperation with the Commission. The Member States holding the Presidency shall take all necessary measures for the organisation and smooth operation of the Council's work, with the assistance of the General Secretariat of the Council.

Article 4

The Council shall adopt a decision establishing the measures for the implementation of this decision.

--------------------------------------------------
# EUR-Lex - 12008E160 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008E160

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - PART THREE: UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS - TITLE X: SOCIAL POLICY - Article 160 (ex Article 144 TEC) **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0118 - 0119 *

Article 160

(ex Article 144 TEC)

The Council, acting by a simple majority after consulting the European Parliament, shall establish a Social Protection Committee with advisory status to promote cooperation on social protection policies between Member States and with the Commission. The tasks of the Committee shall be:

- to monitor the social situation and the development of social protection policies in the Member States and the Union,

- to promote exchanges of information, experience and good practice between Member States and with the Commission,

- without prejudice to Article 240, to prepare reports, formulate opinions or undertake other work within its fields of competence, at the request of either the Council or the Commission or on its own initiative.

In fulfilling its mandate, the Committee shall establish appropriate contacts with management and labour.

Each Member State and the Commission shall appoint two members of the Committee.

--------------------------------------------------
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      Exhibit 23



                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT




The Board of Directors and Stockholders
E-Z Serve Corporation




     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(No. 33-79410 on Form S-8 and No. 33-77772 on Form S-8) of our report dated
March 27, 1997, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of E-Z Serve
Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 29, 1996 and December 31, 1995 and
the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash
flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 29, 1996,
which report appears in the December 29, 1996, annual report on Form 10-K of E-Z
Serve Corporation.  Our report refers to a change to the provisions of the
Financial Accounting Standards No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of
Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets To Be Disposed Of".





                                            KPMG Peat Marwick LLP




Houston, Texas
April 11, 1997
```

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 of the SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Thomas R Johnson, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Call Now Inc..

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report.

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly
report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of Call
Now Inc. as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report.

4. Call Now Inc.'s other certifying officers and I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for Call Now Inc.. and have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to Call Now
Inc., including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of Call Now Inc.'s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90
days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

(c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to our auditors and
the audit committee of our Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect our
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for our auditors any material
weaknesses in internal controls; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant
role in our internal controls.

6. The other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant
changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the
date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses.

March 25, 2004      /s/ Thomas R Johnson
                      ----------------------------------------
                        Thomas R Johnson, Chief Executive
                        Officer and Chief Financial Officer

18
```
#### Booth v. The Domestic Water Company.

1. Appeal.

The right of appeal is statutory, and can be exercised only by the party against whom the judgment was rendered.

2. Same.

If the prevailing party has not obtained all the relief to which he considers himself entitled, his only remedy is by writ of .error.

3. Same—Hocketih© upon Ebbob.

Whenever the appellate court shall dismiss an appeal for lack of jurisdiction to entertain the same, and it appears to the court that it would have had jurisdiction if the action had come up on writ of error, it may order the cause to be docketed as pending on error.

*Appeal from the District Court of Arapahoe County.*

Mr. A. S. Blake, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

*496Thomson, P. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The appellant brought suit against the appellee to recover damages for the alleged wrongful diversion by the appellee of water belonging to the appellant. Equitable relief was also prayed. The case was tried by a jury, who returned a verdict in the plaintiff’s favor for $2,000. A motion by the defendant for a new trial was denied, and the court rendered judgment in favor of the plaintiff for the amount of the verdict and for his costs. Afterwards a motion by the plaintiff for injunctive relief was denied, and thereupon the plaintiff prayed an appeal to this court, -which was allowed upon condition that he file within ninety days an appeal bond in the penal sum of $300. In due time the bond was filed and approved, and the record lodged in this court. It is this record that we are now asked to review.

The only judgment rendered in the case was in the plaintiff’s favor. The right of appeal is statutory, and can be exercised only by the party against whom the judgment is rendered. An appeal bond is conditioned for the payment of the judgment, costs, interest and damages, in case of the affirmance of the judgment, and consequently there can be no appeal by the party recovering judgment. If the prevailing party has not obtained all the relief to which he considers himself entitled, he can have the judgment reviewed here only by writ of error. An attempted appeal where the statute authorizes none confers no jurisdiction upon this court, and any judgment it might undertake to render upon the merits of the controversy would be void. *Hall v. Mining Co.,*6 Colo. 81; *Vallette v. Mining Smelting Co.,*6 Colo. 204; *Fischer v. Hamer,*21 Colo. 9.

It is provided by the code that whenever the appellate court shall dismiss an appeal for lack of jurisdiction to entertain the same, if it appears that the court would have jurisdiction if the action had come up on writ of error, the court shall order the clerk, without additional fees, to enter the action as pending on writ of error, and thereupon all the pro*497ceedings shall he such as if the action had been originally brought to the court on writ of error. Session Laws, 1893, p. 80.

The appeal will therefore be dismissed, and the clerk ordered to enter the cause as pending on writ of error.

*Dismissed and docketed on error.*