alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
OTAQ Meeting Agenda 

Director Chris Grundler

March 26, 2013

20550648.1

1. Introductions

a. Sutherland: Overview of Industry and Position in Market

b. Director Grundler: Vision, Strategy and Priorities for Mobile Source Program

2. Renewable Fuel Standard Program

a. RFS 2013 Standards

i. RIN Prices

ii. Blend Wall and E15

iii. Cellulosic – Court Decision and What Next for Volumes

b. Proposed QAP Program

i. General Thoughts and Comments

ii. How Will it Work for Foreign Producers

iii. QAP Providers

c. Pathway Approvals

d. Foreign Generator Approvals

e. Country Approvals for Aggregate Compliance

3. Gasoline

a. Impact of Refinery Closures and Product Movements

b. Updating RFG and Anti-dumping Rules

c. Tier 3 Sulfur Standards

4. Diesel

a. Registration and Reporting – can be unclear what current registration/reporting 

requirements are applicable

5. Procedural Issues

a. Part 79 – electronic filing possible

b. Changes in Registration Information – timing of acceptance; system locked while 

pending

c. Issues with Universal Reporting Form
Exhibit 23.1




                         Consent of Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-KSB)
of Everest Medical Corporation of our report dated January 13, 1999, included in
the 1998 Annual Report to Shareholders of Everest Medical Corporation.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-40186, 33-64630 and 33-95030) pertaining to the 1989
Employee Stock Purchase Plan, Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 33-64594)
pertaining to the 1992 Stock Option Plan, Registration Statement on Form S-8
(No. 333-21383) pertaining to the 1986 Incentive Stock Option Plan and in
Registration Statement Nos. 333-05729 and 333-10763 on Form S-3, dated June 17,
1996 and August 23, 1996, respectively, of Everest Medical Corporation of our
report dated January 13, 1999, with respect to the financial statements
incorporated herein by reference.


                                                    /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota
March 25, 1999
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of WNC Housing Tax Credit Fund VI, L.P., Series 7 (the “Partnership”) for the quarter ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), and pursuant to 18 U.S.C., section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Melanie R. Wenk, Vice President - Chief Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc., general partner of the Partnership, hereby certify that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.














/s/ MELANIE R. WENK


Melanie R. Wenk


Vice President-Chief Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.
§ 1235.16 How will NARA respond to an agency's request to retain records? ( a ) *Approval.* NARA will provide written approval of the request to retain the records for the specified period within 30 days of receipt of the request.
( b ) *Disapproval.* NARA will provide written disapproval of an agency's request within 30 days. Requests will be denied if the agency is retaining the records primarily to: ( 1 ) Provide access services to persons outside the agency that can be provided by NARA, or
( 2 ) Function as an agency archives, unless specifically authorized by statute or by NARA.
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________ No. 97-1446NI

_____________ John E. Coonley, As Trustee of the * James E. Coonley II Trust; ABCM * Corporation, * * Appeal from the United States Appellants, * District Court for the Northern

* District of Iowa. v. * * [PUBLISHED] Fortis Benefits Insurance Company, * * Appellee. *

_____________ Submitted: October 22, 1997

Filed: October 30, 1997

_____________ Before FAGG, WOLLMAN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

_____________ PER CURIAM. John E. C oonley, as Trustee of the James E. Coonley II Trust, and ABC M Corporationappeal an adverse grant of summary judgment on their claim that James E. Coonley II was an insured employee under a group life insurance policy governed by the Employment Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. See Coonley v. Fortis Benefits Ins. Co. , 956 F. Supp. 841 (N.D. Ia. 1997). Having reviewed the record and the parti es' submissions, we conclude that an extensive discussion is not warranted
. The district court has writte n a comprehensive opinion addressing the issues raised by-2-

the parties, and we have nothing to add to the distr ict court's analysis. We see no error by the district c ourt and affirm the judgment substantially for the reasons stated in the district court's memorandum opinion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF
PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 In connection with the accompanying Form 10-K of Rural Cellular Corporation for the year ended
December 31, 2004, we, Richard P. Ekstrand, President and Chief Executive Officer of Rural Cellular
Corporation, and Wesley E. Schultz, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Rural
Cellular Corporation, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:  (1)
    such Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    the information contained in such Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2004, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of Rural Cellular Corporation. Date: March 14, 2005
    /s/ Richard P. EkstrandRichard P. EkstrandPresident and Chief Executive Officer Date: March 14, 2005
    /s/ Wesley E. SchultzWesley E. Schultz

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6454

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ROY LEE OWENS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Richard C. Erwin, Senior

District Judge. (CR-89-237-R, CA-96-492-3)

Submitted: September 11, 1997 Decided: September 22, 1997

Before RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Roy Lee Owens, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Stanley Glaser, Jr.,

Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

United States v. Owens, Nos. CR-89-237-R; CA-96-492-3 (M.D.N.C.

Mar. 7, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ace Marketing & Promotions, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Sean McDonnell, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




By:
/s/ SEAN MCDONNELLSEAN MCDONNELLPRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICERMay 13, 2011
# EUR-Lex - 12006M026 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12006M026

**Treaty on European Union (consolidated version) - Title V - Provisions on a common foreign and security policy - Article 26 **

*
Official Journal C 321 E , 29/12/2006 P. 0021 - 0021 Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0019 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0161 - Consolidated version *

Article 26

The Secretary-General of the Council, High Representative for the common foreign and security policy, shall assist the Council in matters coming within the scope of the common foreign and security policy, in particular through contributing to the formulation, preparation and implementation of policy decisions, and, when appropriate and acting on behalf of the Council at the request of the Presidency, through conducting political dialogue with third parties.

--------------------------------------------------
#### L. A. Wilson, appellee, v. Anna J. Wilson, appellant.

Filed February 11, 1913.

No. 17,794.

The evidence examined, but not set out in the opinion for the reasons therein stated, *held*sufficient to sustain the findings and decree of the district court.

Appeal from the district court for Gosper county: Ernest B. Perry, Judge.

*Affirmed.*

*R. D. Stearns,*for appellant.

*Ritchie & Wolff,*contra..

Fawcett, J.

There was submitted with the case a motion by defendant to strike from the files the “rejoinder briefs” filed by plaintiff without leave of court. The motion was well taken, and is sustained.

This is a second appeal. Our former opinion is reported *183in 89 Neb. 749. Por a full statement of the controversy between these unhappy parties, reference is made to that opinion. A decree in favor of plaintiff was reversed at that time, for the reason that the trial court had evidently acted upon the theory that extreme cruelty is not a defense to a charge of adultery, and .therefore excluded evidence offered by defendant to sustain a charge of extreme cruelty, set out in her cross-petition. Upon a retrial, and before another district judge, the decree was again in favor of plaintiff and against the defendant, both upon the charge set out in plaintiff’s petition and the countercharge set out in defendant’s cross-petition,. and defendant is again asking relief at our hands.

It would serve no good purpose to the public, and assuredly would not be of any benefit to the parties, to even briefly recount the facts as disclosed by the present record. We deem it sufficient to say that defendant upon the second hearing was given a full opportunity to introduce all of the evidence offered by her at the former trial and any additional evidence she desired. After carefully weighing the evidence, we do not see how we can interfere. The findings and decree of the district court are fully sustained upon every point.

The controversy between the parties as to the property rights of defendant, and as to the liability of plaintiff as guardian of defendant during the time she was his ward, are now being litigated, and will be fully determined in that litigation. There is, therefore, no necessity of a reference to that controversy here.

Finding no error in the record, the judgment of the district court is

Affirmed.
**EXHIBIT32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO § 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with thefiling of the Annual Report on Form 10-K of SuperMedia Inc., a Delawarecorporation (the “Company”), for the year ended December 31, 2009, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),each of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, that, to such officer’s knowledge:

 

1.             The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.             The information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.

 
| Date:                    February 26, 2010 | /s/ Scott W. Klein                     |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                                           | Scott W. Klein                         |
|                                                                                                                                           | Chief Executive Officer                |
|                                                                                                                                           | (Principal Executive  Officer)         |
|                                                                                                                                           |                                   |
|                                                                                                                                           | /s/ Samuel D. Jones                    |
|                                                                                                                                           | Samuel D. Jones                        |
|                                                                                                                                           | Chief Financial Officer  and Treasurer |
|                                                                                                                                           | (Principal Financial  Officer)         |

 

The foregoingcertification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 andis not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

 

----
# EUR-Lex - 12006E058 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12006E058

**Treaty establishing the European Community (consolIdated version) - Part Three - Community policies - TITLE III - Free movement of persons, services and capital - Chapter 4 - Capital and payments - Article 58 **

*
Official Journal C 321 E , 29/12/2006 P. 0064 - 0064 Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0056 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0199 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0025 - Consolidated version *

Article 58

1. The provisions of Article 56 shall be without prejudice to the right of Member States:

(a) to apply the relevant provisions of their tax law which distinguish between taxpayers who are not in the same situation with regard to their place of residence or with regard to the place where their capital is invested;

(b) to take all requisite measures to prevent infringements of national law and regulations, in particular in the field of taxation and the prudential supervision of financial institutions, or to lay down procedures for the declaration of capital movements for purposes of administrative or statistical information, or to take measures which are justified on grounds of public policy or public security.

2. The provisions of this Chapter shall be without prejudice to the applicability of restrictions on the right of establishment which are compatible with this Treaty.

3. The measures and procedures referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 shall not constitute a means of arbitrary discrimination or a disguised restriction on the free movement of capital and payments as defined in Article 56.

--------------------------------------------------
Case 16-26756 Doc 1 Filed 08/19/16 Entered 08/19/16 16:32:01 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 9
Case 16-26756 Doc 1 Filed 08/19/16 Entered 08/19/16 16:32:01 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 9
Case 16-26756 Doc 1 Filed 08/19/16 Entered 08/19/16 16:32:01 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 9
Case 16-26756 Doc 1 Filed 08/19/16 Entered 08/19/16 16:32:01 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 9
Case 16-26756 Doc 1 Filed 08/19/16 Entered 08/19/16 16:32:01 Desc Main

 Document Page 5 of 9
Case 16-26756 Doc 1 Filed 08/19/16 Entered 08/19/16 16:32:01 Desc Main

 Document Page 6 of 9
Case 16-26756 Doc 1 Filed 08/19/16 Entered 08/19/16 16:32:01 Desc Main

 Document Page 7 of 9
Case 16-26756 Doc 1 Filed 08/19/16 Entered 08/19/16 16:32:01 Desc Main

 Document Page 8 of 9
Case 16-26756 Doc 1 Filed 08/19/16 Entered 08/19/16 16:32:01 Desc Main

 Document Page 9 of 9
# EUR-Lex - 12008E/AFI/DCL/34 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008E/AFI/DCL/34

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - DECLARATIONS annexed to the Final Act of the Intergovernmental Conference which adopted the Treaty of Lisbon, signed on 13 December 2007 - A. DECLARATIONS CONCERNING PROVISIONS OF THE TREATIES - 34. Declaration on Article 179 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0349 - 0349 *

34. Declaration on Article 179 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

The Conference agrees that the Union's action in the area of research and technological development will pay due respect to the fundamental orientations and choices of the research policies of the Member States.

--------------------------------------------------
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 21.1

                                  SUBSIDIARIES

                                              JURISDICTION OF
                   SUBSIDIARY                 ORGANIZATION 
                   ----------                 ---------------


 1.       SPSS International, BV                    The Netherlands

 2.       SPSS Asia Pacific Pte Ltd                 Singapore

 3.       SPSS Benelux BV                           The Netherlands

 4.       SPSS GmbH                                 Germany

 5.       SPSS Scandinavia AB                       Sweden

 6.       SPSS UK Ltd.                              England

 7.       SPSS Japan, Inc.                          Japan

 8.       SPSS Australasia Pty Ltd.                 Australia

 9.       SPSS UK Ltd., India                       India

10.       SPSS France Sarl                          France

11.       SPSS Science Software GmbH                Germany

12.       SPSS ASC BV                               The Netherlands

13.       Jandel Corporation                        California

14.       SPSS Ltd.                                 England

15.       SPSS A/S                                  Denmark

16.       Surveycraft Pty Ltd.                      Australia

17.       Integral Solutions Ltd.                   England
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

# ACTION:

Announcement of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces the ninth meeting of the American Health Information Community in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. No. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.) The American Health Information Community will advise the Secretary and recommend specific actions to achieve a common interoperability framework for health information technology (IT). 

# DATES:

October 31, 2006, from 8:30 a.m. to 1 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

Hubert H. Humphrey building (200 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20201), Conference Room 800.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Visit                         *http://www.hhs.gov/​healthit/​ahic.html.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Community will discuss personalized healthcare, review standards recommendations from the Health Information Technology Standards Panel, and set priorities for 2007.

                    A Web cast of the Community meeting will be available on the NIH Web site at:                     *http://www.videocast.nih.gov/​.*

If you have special needs for the meeting, please contact (202) 690-7151.

Dated: October 4, 2006.

Judith Sparrow,

Director, American Health Information Community, Office of Programs and Coordination, Office of the National Coordinator.

[FR Doc. 06-8620 Filed 10-11-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4150-24-M
# EUR-Lex - 12004V137 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V137

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART III — THE POLICIES AND FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - TITLE III — INTERNAL POLICIES AND ACTION - CHAPTER I — INTERNAL MARKET - Section 2 — Free movement of persons and services - Subsection 2 — Freedom of establishment - Article III-137 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0061 - 0061 *

Article III-137

Within the framework of this Subsection, restrictions on the freedom of establishment of nationals of a Member State in the territory of another Member State shall be prohibited. Such prohibition shall also apply to restrictions on the setting-up of agencies, branches or subsidiaries by nationals of any Member State established in the territory of any Member State.

Nationals of a Member State shall have the right, in the territory of another Member State, to take up and pursue activities as self-employed persons and to set up and manage undertakings, in particular companies or firms within the meaning of the second paragraph of Article III-142, under the conditions laid down for its own nationals by the law of the Member State where such establishment is effected, subject to Section 4 relating to capital and payments.

--------------------------------------------------