alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EUR-Lex - 12005SP040 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12005SP040

**Protocol concerning the conditions and arrangements for admission of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania to the European Union - PART FOUR:TEMPORARY PROVISIONS - TITLE IV:OTHER PROVISIONS - Article 40 **

*
Official Journal L 157 , 21/06/2005 P. 0042 - 0042 *

Article 40

In order not to hamper the proper functioning of the internal market, the enforcement of Bulgaria's and Romania's national rules during the transitional periods referred to in Annexes VI and VII shall not lead to border controls between Member States.

--------------------------------------------------
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 5314 Considered and Passed Senate (CPS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 5314

 To designate the medical center of the Department of Veterans Affairs 
  in Tulsa, Oklahoma, as the James Mountain Inhofe VA Medical Center.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 13, 2024

  Mr. Lankford (for himself and Mr. Mullin) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice, considered, read the third time, and passed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the medical center of the Department of Veterans Affairs 
  in Tulsa, Oklahoma, as the James Mountain Inhofe VA Medical Center.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF JAMES MOUNTAIN INHOFE VA MEDICAL CENTER.

    (a) Designation.--The medical center of the Department of Veterans 
Affairs under construction as of the date of the enactment of this Act 
at 440 South Houston Avenue, Tulsa, Oklahoma, shall after such date of 
enactment be known and designated as the ``James Mountain Inhofe 
Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center'' or the ``James Mountain 
Inhofe VA Medical Center''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in any law, regulation, map, 
document, paper, or other record of the United States to the medical 
center referred to in subsection (a) shall be considered to be a 
reference to the James Mountain Inhofe VA Medical Center.
                                 <all>
```
# EUR-Lex - 12008E228 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008E228

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - PART SIX: INSTITUTIONAL AND FINANCIAL PROVISIONS - TITLE I: INSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS - Chapter 1: The institutions - Section 1: The European Parliament - Article 228 (ex Article 195 TEC) **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0150 - 0151 *

Article 228

(ex Article 195 TEC)

1. A European Ombudsman, elected by the European Parliament, shall be empowered to receive complaints from any citizen of the Union or any natural or legal person residing or having its registered office in a Member State concerning instances of maladministration in the activities of the Union institutions, bodies, offices or agencies, with the exception of the Court of Justice of the European Union acting in its judicial role. He or she shall examine such complaints and report on them.

In accordance with his duties, the Ombudsman shall conduct inquiries for which he finds grounds, either on his own initiative or on the basis of complaints submitted to him direct or through a Member of the European Parliament, except where the alleged facts are or have been the subject of legal proceedings. Where the Ombudsman establishes an instance of maladministration, he shall refer the matter to the institution, body, office or agency concerned, which shall have a period of three months in which to inform him of its views. The Ombudsman shall then forward a report to the European Parliament and the institution, body, office or agency concerned. The person lodging the complaint shall be informed of the outcome of such inquiries.

The Ombudsman shall submit an annual report to the European Parliament on the outcome of his inquiries.

2. The Ombudsman shall be elected after each election of the European Parliament for the duration of its term of office. The Ombudsman shall be eligible for reappointment.

The Ombudsman may be dismissed by the Court of Justice at the request of the European Parliament if he no longer fulfils the conditions required for the performance of his duties or if he is guilty of serious misconduct.

3. The Ombudsman shall be completely independent in the performance of his duties. In the performance of those duties he shall neither seek nor take instructions from any Government, institution, body, office or entity. The Ombudsman may not, during his term of office, engage in any other occupation, whether gainful or not.

4. The European Parliament acting by means of regulations on its own initiative in accordance with a special legislative procedure shall, after seeking an opinion from the Commission and with the approval of the Council, lay down the regulations and general conditions governing the performance of the Ombudsman's duties.

--------------------------------------------------
800 Independence Ave., S .W. Washington, DC 20591

May 2 7

, 2016

Mr

. Ryan Lenarcic

OXUS AMERICA

2676 Paldan Dr. Auburn Hills, MI 48326

Dear M r

. Lenarcic

,

This is in response to your letter dated October 7 , 2015, posted to the public docket on December 2, 2015 (No

. FAA

- 2015

- 7369 ) petitioning the Federal Aviation

Administration (FAA) to initiate rulemaking to amend Special Federal Aviation Regulation (SFAR) No. 106 of Title 14

, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR)

.

In your petition, you request an amendment to SFAR No. 106 for use of portabl e oxygen

concentrator (POC) systems on board aircraft. This amendment would include the Oxus

POC model RS

- 00500, tradename Zen

- O , in t he list of approved POC devices for use on

board aircraft.

T he FAA issued a Final R ule on May 24 , 2016

, regarding accept ance criteria for POC s on board aircraft ( Docket: FAA

- 2014

- 0554; DOT/FAA: 2120

- AK32)

. You can review the Final Rule by accessing the above listed Docket through the following website :

 Federal Government Docket website ( http://www.regulations.gov/#!home )

For the reason above, we are denying your petition for rulemaking

.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brandon Roberts

Acting Director, Office of Rulemaking
### UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, DC

Anoka Air, Inc., et al Complainant,


### v. FAA Docket No. 16-11-12 Metropolitan Airports Commission Respondent.



### NOTICE OF EXTENSION OF TIME
This matter is before the Federal Aviation Administrat ion (FAA) based on the abovereferenced complaint, fi led in accordance with FAA Rul es of Practice for Federally-Assisted Airport Enforcement Pro ceedings , 14 CFR, part 16. Pursuant to 14 CFR, part 16 , subpart B , the date by which the Director' s Determination will be issued 

### in this matter is hereby extended to November 30 , 2016. An extension oftime is necessary and appropriate for a fair and complete determination in this case.

in C. Willis D rector, Office of Airport Compliance

and Management Analysis I DateCERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on October 14, 2016, I caused to be placed in the United States mail (first class mail , postage paid) a true copy ofthe Notice of Extension of Time addressed to:
Counsel for Complainant: Steven M. Taber, Esq. Taber Law Group 13 Atlanta Irvine, CA 92620 Facsimile: (714) 707-4282 Counsel for Re spondent: Thomas W. Anderson, Esq. General Counsel Metropolitan Airports Commission 6040 28th A venue South Minneapolis, MN 55450 Facsim ile: (612) 726-5306 Pablo 

### 0. NUesch, Es q. Spiegel & McDiarmid LLP 1

875 Eye Street, NW- Suite 700 Washington, DC 20006 Facsimile: (202) 393-2866 Copy to: FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket FAA Office of Airport Compliance and Management Analysis, A CO-l 00



# ~~tk_ Claudia Roberts Office ofAirport Compliance

and Management Analysis
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 7875** 

HOWARD CLEVELAND, JR. , Petitioner

- Appellant ,
v. RICHARD L. NEELY , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina , at Greensboro
. Loretta Copeland Biggs , District Judge. ( 1:15

- cv - 00549

- LCB

- JEP )

Submitted : February 25, 2016 Decided: March 2, 2016

Before SHEDD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Howard Cleveland, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Howard Cleveland, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation o f the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (A) (2012)
. A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(2) (2012)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclud e that Cleveland has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions3 are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
# EUR-Lex - 12006E017 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12006E017

**Treaty establishing the European Community (consolidated version) - Part Two - Citizenship of the Union - Article 17 **

*
Official Journal C 321 E , 29/12/2006 P. 0049 - 0049 Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0044 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0186 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0010 - Consolidated version *

Article 17

1. Citizenship of the Union is hereby established. Every person holding the nationality of a Member State shall be a citizen of the Union. Citizenship of the Union shall complement and not replace national citizenship.

2. Citizens of the Union shall enjoy the rights conferred by this Treaty and shall be subject to the duties imposed thereby.

--------------------------------------------------
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
of Maverick Tube Corporation and subsidiaries of our report dated February 6,
2004 included in the 2003 Annual Report to Stockholders of Maverick Tube
Corporation.

Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of Maverick Tube
Corporation listed in Item 15(a). This schedule is the responsibility of the
Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our
audits. In our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above, when
considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole,
presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-3 No. 333-111441, Form S-3 No. 333-106976, Form S-3 No. 333-103355, Form
S-3 No. 333-61292, Form S-3 No. 333-42144, Form S-3 No. 333-87045, and Form S-3
No. 333-83478) and in the related Prospectuses of Maverick Tube Corporation and
in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 No. 33-89526, Form S-8 No. 333-52621,
Form S-8 No. 333-30696, and Form S-8 No. 333-46740) pertaining to the Maverick
Tube Corporation Amended and Restated 1990 Stock Option Plan, the Maverick Tube
Corporation 1994 Stock Option Plan, the Maverick Tube Corporation Director Stock
Option Plan, the Maverick Tube Corporation 1999 Director Stock Option Plan, and
the Amended and Restated Prudential Steel Ltd. Stock Option Plan of Maverick
Tube Corporation of our report dated February 6, 2004, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of Maverick Tube Corporation and
subsidiaries included and incorporated by reference in the Annual Report (Form
10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2003.

                                                     /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

St. Louis, Missouri
March 8, 2004
USGS Publications Warehouse - Citation View 

USGS Publications Warehouse htt1 of 3 
Publication Citation

Online Document Versions

View index pageView plate 1View version history

USGS Store

Available for purchase as item number:205637

PublicationType USGS Numbered SeriesTitle Remote sensing for environmental site screening and watershed evaluation in Utah Mine la

mountains, Oquirrh mountains, and Tushar mountains

Author Rockwell, Barnaby W.; McDougal, Robert R.; Gent, Carol A.Year 2005Series Scientific Investigations ReportSeriesNumber 2004-5241Edition Version 1.2Language ENGLISHDescription viii, 84 p.; 1 CD-ROMScale 100000

Abstract:Imaging spectroscopy-a powerful remote-sensing tool for mapping subtle variations in the composition of mineraman-made materials on the Earth's surface-was applied in support of environmental assessments and watershed several mining districts in the State of Utah. Three areas were studied through the use of Landsat 7 ETM+ and AVisible/Infrared Imaging Spectrometer (AVIRIS) data: (1) the Tintic mining district in the East Tintic Mountains (2) the Camp Floyd mining district (including the Mercur mine) and the Stockton (or Rush Valley) mining districMountains south of the Great Salt Lake, and (3) the Tushar Mountains and Antelope Range near Marysvale. The were used for initial site screening and the planning of AVIRIS surveys. The AVIRIS data were analyzed to creatmaps of surface minerals with special emphasis on locating and characterizing rocks and soils with acid-producin

USGS Publications Warehouse htt2 of 3 
Accessibility FOIA Privacy Policies and Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological SurveyURL: http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/Page Contact Information: Contact the Pubs Warehouse TeamPage Last modified: 12/08/2011 15:05:22

USGS Publications Warehouse htt3 of 3
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

In re: 

Elizabeth Anne Tarpley

Debtor(s)

Case No. 16 B 29756

CHAPTER 13 STANDING TRUSTEE’S FINAL REPORT AND ACCOUNT

Marilyn O. Marshall, chapter 13 trustee, submits the following Final Report and Account 

of the administration of the estate pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1302(b)(1). The trustee declares as 

follows:

1) The case was filed on 09/19/2016.

2) The plan was confirmed on NA .

3) The plan was modified by order after confirmation pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1329 on

NA .

4) The trustee filed action to remedy default by the debtor in performance under the plan 

on NA .

5) The case was Converted on 10/21/2016.

6) Number of months from filing to last payment: 0.

7) Number of months case was pending: 9.

8) Total value of assets abandoned by court order: NA .

9) Total value of assets exempted: NA .

10) Amount of unsecured claims discharged without payment: $0.00.

11) All checks distributed by the trustee relating to this case have cleared the bank.

UST Form 101-13-FR-S (9/1/2009)

Case 16-29756 Doc 46 Filed 06/27/17 Entered 06/27/17 09:59:14 Desc Page 1

 of 3
Receipts:

Total paid by or on behalf of the debtor $0.00

Less amount refunded to debtor $0.00

NET RECEIPTS: $0.00

Expenses of Administration:

Attorney’s Fees Paid Through the Plan $0.00

Court Costs $0.00

Trustee Expenses & Compensation $0.00

Other $0.00

TOTAL EXPENSES OF ADMINISTRATION: $0.00

Attorney fees paid and disclosed by debtor: $0.00

Scheduled Creditors:

Creditor

Name Class

Claim

Scheduled

Claim

Asserted

Claim

Allowed

Int.

Paid

Principal

Paid

Summary of Disbursements to Creditors:

Secured Payments:

Mortgage Ongoing

Mortgage Arrearage

Debt Secured by Vehicle

All Other Secured

TOTAL SECURED:

Priority Unsecured Payments:

Domestic Support Arrearage

Domestic Support Ongoing

All Other Priority

TOTAL PRIORITY:

GENERAL UNSECURED PAYMENTS:

Claim

Allowed

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

Principal

Paid

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

Interest

Paid

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

UST Form 101-13-FR-S (9/1/2009)

Case 16-29756 Doc 46 Filed 06/27/17 Entered 06/27/17 09:59:14 Desc Page 2

 of 3
Disbursements:

Expenses of Administration $0.00

Disbursements to Creditors $0.00

TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS : $0.00

12) The trustee certifies that the foregoing summary is true and complete and all 

administrative matters for which the trustee is responsible have been completed. The trustee 

requests that the trustee be discharged and granted such relief as may be just and proper.

Dated: 06/27/2017

STATEMENT: This Unified Form is associated with an open bankruptcy case, therefore, Paperwork Reduction 

Act exemption 5 C.F.R. § 1320.4(a)(2) applies.

By:/s/ Marilyn O. Marshall

Trustee

UST Form 101-13-FR-S (9/1/2009)

Case 16-29756 Doc 46 Filed 06/27/17 Entered 06/27/17 09:59:14 Desc Page 3

 of 3
§ 1280.14 Weapons and explosives. ( a ) Federal law prohibits individuals to possess firearms or other dangerous weapons in Federal facilities unless the person is specifically authorized to possess such a weapon under 18 U.S.C. 930. State-issued carry permits are not valid in Federal facilities. Violators are subject to fine and/or imprisonment for a period up to five years.
( b ) You are also prohibited from bringing or possessing explosives, or items intended for use in fabricating an explosive or incendiary device, either openly or concealed, on or in NARA property and facilities.
# EUR-Lex - 12008E300 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008E300

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - PART SIX: INSTITUTIONAL AND FINANCIAL PROVISIONS - TITLE I: INSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS - Chapter 3: The Union's advisory bodies - Article 300 **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0177 - 0177 *

Article 300

1. The European Parliament, the Council and the Commission shall be assisted by an Economic and Social Committee and a Committee of the Regions, exercising advisory functions.

2. The Economic and Social Committee shall consist of representatives of organisations of employers, of the employed, and of other parties representative of civil society, notably in socio-economic, civic, professional and cultural areas.

3. The Committee of the Regions shall consist of representatives of regional and local bodies who either hold a regional or local authority electoral mandate or are politically accountable to an elected assembly.

4. The members of the Economic and Social Committee and of the Committee of the Regions shall not be bound by any mandatory instructions. They shall be completely independent in the performance of their duties, in the Union's general interest.

5. The rules referred to in paragraphs 2 and 3 governing the nature of the composition of the Committees shall be reviewed at regular intervals by the Council to take account of economic, social and demographic developments within the Union. The Council, on a proposal from the Commission, shall adopt decisions to that end.

--------------------------------------------------
<PAGE>   1





                        TPC CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

                 EXHIBIT 11:  COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                     FOR THE YEAR ENDED
                                                                                       DECEMBER 31,    
                                                                                 -------------------------
                                                                                    1996           1995
                                                                                 -----------   -----------
<S>                                                                              <C>           <C>
Average common shares outstanding ............................................    18,072,851    14,424,257
Net  effect  of dilutive  stock  options - based  on the  treasury stock
  method using average market price ..........................................       621,753     1,184,653
                                                                                 -----------   -----------
Weighted average shares outstanding ..........................................    18,694,604    15,608,910
                                                                                 ===========   ===========
Income Before Extraordinary Item .............................................   $ 5,044,000   $   494,000
Extraordinary Item, net of income tax provision of $107,000 in 1995 ..........            --       207,000
                                                                                 -----------   -----------
Net income ...................................................................   $ 5,044,000   $   701,000
                                                                                 ===========   ===========
Income per Common Share Before Extraordinary Item ............................   $       .27   $       .04
Extraordinary Item ...........................................................            --           .01
                                                                                 -----------   -----------
Net income per common share ..................................................   $       .27   $       .05
                                                                                 ===========   ===========
</TABLE>
Case 16-00505 Doc 10 Filed 10/06/16 Entered 10/07/16 09:51:00 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 4
Case 16-00505 Doc 10 Filed 10/06/16 Entered 10/07/16 09:51:00 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 4
Case 16-00505 Doc 10 Filed 10/06/16 Entered 10/07/16 09:51:00 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 4
Case 16-00505 Doc 10 Filed 10/06/16 Entered 10/07/16 09:51:00 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 4
#### § 1212.105 Does this part apply to me?

(a) Portions of this part apply to you if you are either—

(1) A recipient of an assistance award from the NARA; or

(2) A(n) NARA awarding official. (See definitions of award and recipient in §§ 1212.605 and 1212.660, respectively.)

(b) The following table shows the subparts that apply to you:

| If you are . . . | see subparts . . . |
| --- | --- |
| (1) A recipient who is not an individual | A, B and E. |
| (2) A recipient who is an individual | A, C and E. |
| (3) A(n) NARA awarding official | A, D and E. |