alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, March 29, 2022.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, March 29, 2022

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A22I0149. RYAN LILES v. THE STATE.

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

2121T1219
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-51012 Summary Calendar

MARY LOUISE BETSILL, Individually and as personal representative of the Estate of John C. Abney, deceased, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. SA-01-CV-327

-------------------- August 1, 2002 Before JONES, SMITH, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Mary Louise Betsill appeals the district court’s grant of the Government’s motion to dismiss her Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) action for failure to comply with the jurisdictional notice requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 2675. Betsill argues that the dismissal was error because her administrative claim complied with this court’s precedents since it provided sufficient noticeNo. 01-51012 -2- to allow the Government to investigate the claim and it specified an amount for the claim. We review de novo. See Shanbaum v. United States , 32 F.3d 180, 182 (5th Cir. 1994). The information contained on the Standard Form 95 submitted to the Government coupled with the additional evidence of authorization to represent Abney and his estate, which she submitted at the Government’s request, satisfied the notice requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 2675(a). See Adams v. United States , 615 F.2d 284, 289 (5th Cir. 1980). Therefore, the district court’s dismissal of the claim brought on Abney’s behalf by Betsill was error and that portion of the district court’s decision is vacated and remanded for further proceedings. Betsill does not argue that she was entitled to bring the FTCA claim in her individual capacity. However, to the extent that she attempts to raise such a claim it is barred by 28 U.S.C. § 2675(a). Therefore, the district court’s dismissal of the complaint by Betsill in her “individual” capacity is affirmed.
AFFIRMED IN PART; VACATED AND REMANDED IN PART.
§ 228.110 Indemnification. The operator and, if the operator does not hold all of the interest in the applicable lease, all lessees and transferees are jointly and severally liable in accordance with Federal and State laws for indemnifying the United States for: ( a ) Injury, loss or damage, including fire suppression costs, which the United States incurs as a result of the operations; and
( b ) Payments made by the United States in satisfaction of claims, demands or judgments for an injury, loss or damage, including fire suppression costs, which result from the operations.
# EUR-Lex - 12008E103 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008E103

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - PART THREE: UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS - TITLE VII: COMMON RULES ON COMPETITION, TAXATION AND APPROXIMATION OF LAWS - Chapter 1: Rules on competition - Section 1: Rules applying to undertakings - Article 103 (ex Article 83 TEC) **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0089 - 0090 *

Article 103

(ex Article 83 TEC)

1. The appropriate regulations or directives to give effect to the principles set out in Articles 101 and 102 shall be laid down by the Council, on a proposal from the Commission and after consulting the European Parliament.

2. The regulations or directives referred to in paragraph 1 shall be designed in particular:

(a) to ensure compliance with the prohibitions laid down in Article 101(1) and in Article 102 by making provision for fines and periodic penalty payments;

(b) to lay down detailed rules for the application of Article 101(3), taking into account the need to ensure effective supervision on the one hand, and to simplify administration to the greatest possible extent on the other;

(c) to define, if need be, in the various branches of the economy, the scope of the provisions of Articles 101 and 102;

(d) to define the respective functions of the Commission and of the Court of Justice of the European Union in applying the provisions laid down in this paragraph;

(e) to determine the relationship between national laws and the provisions contained in this Section or adopted pursuant to this Article.

--------------------------------------------------
_. .-U-... \I'.yipmf miBWj^ j^^. ^ • 

CAPITAL AREA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY 

Pete r A. Kuhnmuench , Board Chair * Sandr a L. Draggoo , CEO/Executive Director 

February 15, 2012 

Docket Management Facility 

U. S. Dept. of Transportation 

Docket No. FAA-2012-0089 

1200 New Jersey Ave. SE, West BIdg. Grand Floor 

Room W-120140 

Washington, DC 20590 

'0 

Gentlemen: 

rn--'-!rn ill 

As CEO of the Capital Area Transportation Authority in Lansing, Michigan, it is vital that we have a 

robust airport for our Region. The role that Sun Country plays is very important to our Region. Two 

weeks ago I rode Sun Country to Florida and during the second week in March, I have tickets on Sun 

Country to travel to Washington, D. C. I was VERY pleased with my trip. It left ON TIME, got to 

Florida EARLY and the flight attendants were FRIENDLY and EFFICIENT!!! What more could I ask for? 

I understand that the service to D. C. is in jeopardy because a federal court has ruled that the U. S. 

Department of Transportation was wrong when Sun Country was given slots at Reagan National 

Airport. The U. S. Court of Appeals ruled that DOT had broken a precedent of allowmg slot transfers 

as part of acquisitions or mergers. The court said Republic Airways Holdings Inc. should have retained 

the slot as part of its acquisition of Midwest Airlines Inc. Sun Country should be held harmless and is 

NOT REPONSIBLE for the error. It invested in aircraft and staff for year-round service to D. C. from 

our airport. DOT has a means to allow Sun Country to fly --- even if it returns a slot to Republic. It 

can authorize additional slots"under an exemption rule. Sun Country has appealed to request just 

that . . •.-•.:.• " 

This route Has great importance to.the,Greater Lansing's economic development efforts. This 

exemption will NOT adversely affect safety, since the airline has provided safe service on the route 

since last April. 

Please hear me when we say how innportant this is to us. Please give Sun Country their 

EXEMPTION!!! I It is important!!!! Thank you very much for your consideration in this matter. 

. Sincerely 

Sandra 1 . Draggc 

ceo/Executive Director 

Cc: Chris Holman, (fhair Board of Directors 

Peter Kuhnmuench, CATA Chair 

Robert Selig, Airport Manager 

. •: • Robert Trezise, LEAP Director 

^ 1-

4615 Tranter Street • Lansing. Michigan 48910 • (517) 394-1100 • FAX (517) 394-3733 • www.cata.org @
# EUR-Lex - 12004V434 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V434

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART III — THE POLICIES AND FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - TITLE VII — COMMON PROVISIONS - Article III-434 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0184 - 0184 *

Article III-434

The Union shall enjoy in the territories of the Member States such privileges and immunities as are necessary for the performance of its tasks, under the conditions laid down in the Protocol on the privileges and immunities of the European Union.

--------------------------------------------------
1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

THAD WHITE,

Plaintiff and Appell ant

,

v.

MONTANA BOARD OF CRIME CONTROL,

Respondent and Appellee,
and

PUBLIC SAFETY OFFICER
STANDARDS AND TRAINING COUNCIL,

Intervenor. No. DA

- 2 2

- 0 748

SECOND UNOPPOSED
MOTION FOR EXTENSION
OF TIME TO FILE
OPENING BRIEF

Upon consideration of Appell ant Thad White ’s Second Motion for

Extension of Time to File his Opening Brief , and good cause appearing, IT IS

HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant shall have up to and including May 17

, 202 3

to file his Opening Brief.

ELECTRONICALLY SIGNED AND DATED BELOW

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 11 2023

04/11/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0748
§ 13.450 Prohibition of aircraft use. ( a ) Notwithstanding the provisions 43 CFR 36.11(f) the use of aircraft for access to or from lands and waters within a national park or monument for purposes of taking fish or wildlife for subsistence uses within the national park or monument is prohibited except as provided in this section.
( b ) *Exceptions.* ( 1 ) In extraordinary cases where no reasonable alternative exists, the Superintendent shall permit, pursuant to specified terms and conditions, a local rural resident of an “exempted community” to use aircraft for access to or from lands and water within a national park or monument for purposes of taking fish or wildlife for subsistence uses. ( i ) A community shall quality as an “exempted community” if, because of the location of the subsistence resources upon which it depends and the extraordinary difficulty of surface access to these subsistence resources, the local rural residents who permanently reside in the community have no reasonable alternative to aircraft use for access to these subsistence resources.
( ii ) A community which is determined, after notice and comment (including public hearing in the affected local vicinity), to meet the description of an “exempted community” set forth in paragraph (b)(1) of this section shall be included in the appropriate special regulations for each park and monument in this part.
( iii ) A community included as an “exempted community” in the special regulations of this part may be deleted therefrom upon a determination, after notice and comment (including public hearing in the affected local vicinity), that it does not meet the description of an “exempted community” set forth in paragraph (b)(1) of this section.
( 2 ) Any local rural resident aggrieved by the prohibition on aircraft use set forth in this section may apply for an exception to the prohibition pursuant to the procedures set forth in § 13.495. In extraordinary cases where no reasonable alternative exists, the Superintendent may grant the exception upon a determination that the location of the subsistence resources depended upon and the difficulty of surface access to these resources, or other emergency situation, requires such relief.
( c ) Nothing in this section shall prohibit the use of aircraft for access to lands and waters within a national park or monument for purposes of engaging in any activity allowed by law other than the taking of fish and wildlife. Such activities include, but are not limited to, transporting supplies.
§ 2.16 Horses and pack animals. The following are prohibited: ( a ) The use of animals other than those designated as “pack animals” for purposes of transporting equipment.
( b ) The use of horses or pack animals outside of trails, routes or areas designated for their use.
( c ) The use of horses or pack animals on a park road, except: ( 1 ) Where such travel is necessary to cross to or from designated trails, or areas, or privately owned property, and no alternative trails or routes have been designated; or
( 2 ) when the road has been closed to motor vehicles.
( d ) Free-trailing or loose-herding of horses or pack animals on trails, except as designated.
( e ) Allowing horses or pack animals to proceed in excess of a slow walk when passing in the immediate vicinity of persons on foot or bicycle.
( f ) Obstructing a trail, or making an unreasonable noise or gesture, considering the nature and purpose of the actor's conduct, and other factors that would govern the conduct of a reasonably prudent person, while horses or pack animals are passing.
( g ) Violation of conditions which may be established by the superintendent concerning the use of horses or pack animals.
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Innovative Software  Technologies,  Inc.
(the  "Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending March 31, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I,  Christopher  J. Floyd,  Chief  Financial  Officer of the  Company,  certify,
pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

            (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
            or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) the information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.


/s/ Christopher J. Floyd
------------------------------------
Christopher J. Floyd
Chief Financial Officer
May 20, 2005
# EUR-Lex - 12008E049 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008E049

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - PART THREE: UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS - TITLE IV: FREE MOVEMENT OF PERSONS, SERVICES AND CAPITAL - Chapter 2: Right of establishment - Article 49 (ex Article 43 TEC) **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0067 - 0067 *

Article 49

(ex Article 43 TEC)

Within the framework of the provisions set out below, restrictions on the freedom of establishment of nationals of a Member State in the territory of another Member State shall be prohibited. Such prohibition shall also apply to restrictions on the setting-up of agencies, branches or subsidiaries by nationals of any Member State established in the territory of any Member State.

Freedom of establishment shall include the right to take up and pursue activities as self-employed persons and to set up and manage undertakings, in particular companies or firms within the meaning of the second paragraph of Article 54, under the conditions laid down for its own nationals by the law of the country where such establishment is effected, subject to the provisions of the Chapter relating to capital.

--------------------------------------------------
§ 291.33 Use of recovered amounts. Penalties and/or restitution collected shall be available to the Authorized Officer and without further appropriation may be used only as follows: ( a ) To protect, restore, or repair the paleontological resources and sites which were the subject of the action, and to protect, monitor, and study the resources and sites; and/or
( b ) To provide educational materials to the public about paleontological resources, sites, and their protection; and/or
( c ) To provide for the payment of rewards as provided in § 291.40.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting cancellation. 

# SUMMARY:

On September 20, 2006, the Department of Defense published a notice of meeting (71 FR 54980) scheduled for September 28, 2006. Due to inability to achieve a quorum the meeting was cancelled. This notice announces the cancellation. This meeting may be rescheduled and announced at a later date.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Kelly Van Niman, Executive Director, DBB, 703-697-2346 or                         *Kelly.vanniman@osd.mil.*

Dated: September 21, 2006.

C.R. Choate,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 06-8290 Filed 9-26-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-M
#### § 1202.50 Does NARA require prepayment of fees?

If the system manager determines that the estimated total fee is likely to exceed $250, NARA will notify you that the estimated fee must be prepaid before you can have copies of the records. If the final fee is less than the amount you prepaid, NARA will refund the difference.
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 200 (Tuesday, October 17, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 61073]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-8719]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Advisory Committee for Engineering; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 
as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following 
meeting:

    Name: Advisory Committee for Engineering (1170).
    Date/Time: November 16, 2006; 8 a.m.-5 p.m. November 17, 2006; 8 
a.m.-12 p.m.
    Place: National Science Foundation, Room 1235.
    Type of Meeting: Open Session.
    Contact Person: Deborah Young, Administrative Officer, Office of 
the Assistant Director for Engineering, 703-292-8301.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice, recommendations and 
counsel on major goals and policies pertaining to engineering 
programs and activities.
    Agenda: Major topics will include:
    Overview and Discussion of Engineering Themes

--Biology in Engineering.
--Complexity in Engineered and Natural Systems.
--Critical Infrastructure Systems.
--Manufacturing Frontiers.
--New Frontiers in Nanotechnology.

    Update on Cyberinfrastructure and Simulation-Based Engineering 
Science.
    K-12 Subcommittee.
    Industry Partnerships Subcommittee.
    Diversity.

    Dated: October 12, 2006.
Susanne Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 06-8719 Filed 10-16-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 5562 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 5562

        To modify United States-Israel anti-tunnel cooperation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            December 17 (legislative day, December 16), 2024

 Mr. Peters (for himself and Mr. Budd) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
        To modify United States-Israel anti-tunnel cooperation.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MODIFICATION OF UNITED STATES-ISRAEL ANTI-TUNNEL 
              COOPERATION.

    Subsection (a)(1) of section 1279 of the National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (22 U.S.C. 8606 note) is 
amended, in the first sentence, by striking ``detect, map, and 
neutralize underground tunnels'' and inserting ``detect, map, maneuver 
in, and neutralize underground tunnels''.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 81.14 Comprehensive plan alternative.

In the event that the State elects to operate under a comprehensive fish and wildlife resource planning system, the Cooperative Agreement will be an attachment to the plan. No Application for Federal Assistance will be required since the documentation will be incorporated in the plan. However, the continued existence of the comprehensive plan, and Federal financing thereunder, will be contingent upon the continued existence of the Cooperative Agreement described in § 81.3, above.
# EUR-Lex - 12008E217 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008E217

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - PART FIVE: EXTERNAL ACTION BY THE UNION - TITLE IV: RESTRICTIVE MEASURES - Article 217 (ex Article 310 TEC) **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0144 - 0144 *

Article 217

(ex Article 310 TEC)

The Union may conclude with one or more third countries or international organisations agreements establishing an association involving reciprocal rights and obligations, common action and special procedure.

--------------------------------------------------
# EUR-Lex - 12004V070 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V070

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART II — THE CHARTER OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THE UNION - TITLE II — FREEDOMS - Article II-70 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0044 - 0044 *

Article II-70

Freedom of thought, conscience and religion

1. Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion. This right includes freedom to change religion or belief and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or in private, to manifest religion or belief, in worship, teaching, practice and observance.

2. The right to conscientious objection is recognised, in accordance with the national laws governing the exercise of this right.

--------------------------------------------------
1

W W W . V I N O T E M P . C O M

A P R O U D H E R I T A G E O F E X P E R I E N C E & Q U A L I T Y

O W N E R ’ S M A N U A L

T o u c h S c r e e n W i n e & 

B e v e r a g e C o o l e r 

V T- 3 6 T S
8

8 W W W . V I N O T E M P . C O M

PARTS AND SPECIFICATIONS

Model No. VT-36 TS

Voltage AC 115V

Frequency 60 Hz

Current 2.0 A (77°F)

Protection Class/Climate Class I / SN; N

Refrigerant R134a/1.58 oz

Power Consumption 1.0 kw.h/24h (59°F)

Input Power 100W (77°F)

Ambient Temperature Range 60°- 90°F

Control Temperature Range Left Zone: 36°- 43°F

Right Zone: 40°- 72°F

Capacity Left Zone: 58 12 oz. cans 

Right Zone: 19 bottles

Net Weight 100 LBS

Gross Weight 110 LBS

Unit Dimensions (W x D x H) 23.43” x 22.44” x 32.28”

*Note: This wine and beverage cooler is designed to store approximately 19 standard Bordeaux 750 

ml bottles. Storing large and/or oddly shaped bottles (including champagne and sparkling wine bottles) 

will decrease the capacity of your appliance.
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20463

 

December 22, 2022 

 

VIA E-MAIL

cburns@wiley.law

lgoodman@wiley.law

awoodson@wiley.law

Caleb P. Burns 

Lee E. Goodman 

Andrew G. Woodson 

Wiley Rein LLP

2050 M Street, NW

Washington, DC 20036 

 RE: MUR 8082 

Florida Power & Light Company 

` 

Dear Messrs. Caleb, Goodman and Woodson: 

This is in response to a second request for an extension to respond to the complaint filed in 

the above mentioned matter we received on December 19, 2022. We are in receipt of a tolling 

agreement and the requested extension is granted. The response will now be due on or before the 

close of business January 23, 2023. You may contact me if you have any questions at cela@fec.gov.

 Sincerely, 

 

 Kathryn Ross, Paralegal

 Complaints Examination and 

 Legal Administration 

MUR808200101