alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 219.14 Decision document and planning records. ( a ) *Decision document approving a new plan, plan amendment, or revision.* The responsible official shall record approval of a new plan, plan amendment, or revision in a decision document prepared according to Forest Service NEPA procedures (36 CFR part 220). The decision document must include: ( 1 ) The rationale for approval;
( 2 ) A statement of how the plan, plan amendment, or plan revision applies to approved projects and activities (§ 219.15);
( 3 ) The documentation of how the best available scientific information was used to inform planning, the plan components, and other plan content, including the plan monitoring program (§ 219.3);
( 4 ) The concurrence by the appropriate research station director with any part of the plan applicable to any experimental forests or experimental ranges (§ 219.2(b)(4)); and
( 5 ) The effective date of the plan, amendment, or revision.
( b ) *Decision document for a new plan or plan revision.* In addition to meeting the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section, the decision document must include an explanation of how the plan components meet the sustainability requirements of § 219.8, the diversity requirements of § 219.9, the multiple use requirements of § 219.10, and the timber requirements of § 219.11.
( c ) *Decision document for a plan amendment.* In addition to meeting the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section, the decision document must explain how the responsible official determined: ( 1 ) The scope and scale of the plan amendment; and
( 2 ) Which specific requirements within §§ 219.8 through 219.11 apply to the amendment and how they were applied.
( d ) *Planning records.* ( 1 ) The responsible official shall keep the following documents readily accessible to the public by posting them online and through other means: assessment reports (§ 219.6); the plan, including the monitoring program; the proposed plan, plan amendment, or plan revision; public notices and environmental documents associated with a plan; plan decision documents; and monitoring evaluation reports (§ 219.12).
( 2 ) The planning record includes documents that support analytical conclusions made and alternatives considered throughout the planning process. The responsible official shall make the planning record available at the office where the plan, plan amendment, or plan revision was developed.
[77 FR 21260, Apr. 9, 2012, as amended at 81 FR 90738, Dec. 15, 2016]
# EUR-Lex - 12006E312 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12006E312

**Treaty establishing the European Community (consolidated version) - Part Six - General and final provisions - Article 312 **

*
Official Journal C 321 E , 29/12/2006 P. 0180 - 0180 Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0154 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0301 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0078 - Consolidated version (EEC Treaty - no official publication available) *

Article 312

This Treaty is concluded for an unlimited period.

--------------------------------------------------
§ 21.8 Employee certification. ( a ) Employees engaged as physical therapists must be licensed or certified by a State or territory of the United States to practice
( b ) Employees engaged as physical therapy aids or physical therapy technicians will be certified by the Superintendent upon completion of an examination.
( c ) Employees engaged as masseurs or masseuses must be licensed or certified by a State or territory of the United States, or be certified by the Superintendent upon the completion of an examination.
( d ) Employees engaged as bath attendants will be certified by the Superintendent upon completion of an apprenticeship and an examination.
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Salon Media Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the “Report”), I, Richard Gingras, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/
      Richard GingrasFebruary
      12, 2010
            
            
            Richard
      GingrasChief
      Executive Officer
§ 1211.405 Housing. ( a ) *Generally.* A recipient shall not, on the basis of sex, apply different rules or regulations, impose different fees or requirements, or offer different services or benefits related to housing, except as provided in this section (including housing provided only to married students).
( b ) *Housing provided by recipient.* ( 1 ) A recipient may provide separate housing on the basis of sex.
( 2 ) Housing provided by a recipient to students of one sex, when compared to that provided to students of the other sex, shall be as a whole: ( i ) Proportionate in quantity to the number of students of that sex applying for such housing; and
( ii ) Comparable in quality and cost to the student.
( c ) *Other housing.* ( 1 ) A recipient shall not, on the basis of sex, administer different policies or practices concerning occupancy by its students of housing other than that provided by such recipient.
( 2 ) ( i ) A recipient which, through solicitation, listing, approval of housing, or otherwise, assists any agency, organization, or person in making housing available to any of its students, shall take such reasonable action as may be necessary to assure itself that such housing as is provided to students of one sex, when compared to that provided to students of the other sex, is as a whole: ( A ) Proportionate in quantity; and
( B ) Comparable in quality and cost to the student.
( ii ) A recipient may render such assistance to any agency, organization, or person that provides all or part of such housing to students of only one sex.
[No. 1931.]

#### George Leonard *v.*The State.

1. Robbery — Continuance — Charge of the Court — Case Approved. — This case being the companion to *Bond*v. *The State, mite,*p. 431, the same questions upon the subjects of the continuance applied for, and the charge of the court upon the definition of robbery, were raised. See the opinion in Bond’s case for the determination of the questions.

3. Practice.—Privilege of Argument was not abused by prosecuting counsel in this case by the declaration that “the defendant stood mute and said nothing when accused of this crime by the prosecuting witness in the presence of the officers of the law.’’ Such fact was in evidence, and was a proper subject for comment.

Appeal from the District Court of Grayson. Tried below before the Hon. E. Maltbie.

This is the companion case to that of *Bond*v. *The State, ante,*page 421. As in that case, the conviction was for the robbery of E. H. Pierce, in Grayson county, Texas, on the 20th day of October, 1885. It was based upon the testimony of the same witnesses who testified in Bond’s case, to substantially the same facts. The penalty assessed against the appellant was a term of ten years in the penitentiary.

*G. W. Pasco,*for the appellant.

*J. E. Burts,*Assistant Attorney-General, for the State.

*443[Opinion delivered February 27, 1886.]

White, Presiding Judge.

This is a companion case to the case of *Burrell Bond*v. *The State,*just decided. In this as in that case at a former day of this term the judgment of the lower court was reversed and the cause remanded, for a supposed error in the charge of the court. One error in that respect is pointed out and discussed in Bond’s case. For the reasons therein stated the motion for a rehearing in this case is granted.

Upon the merits of this case we find but two bills of exceptions in the record; one being to the overruling of the defendant’s application for continuance for the absence of the witness Kissinger. This application in every material respect is a duplicate of the one in the Bond case, and for the same reasons as therein stated the ruling of the court upon it is sustained.

The second bill of exceptions complains that the county attorney in his closing argument to the jury stated that “ this defendant stood mute and said nothing when accused of this crime by Pierce, the prosecuting witness, in the presence of the officers of the law.” The county attorney, in so stating, was entirely within the record as we read it, and stated what was a fact in the case, and one which was as much and legitimately a subject for discussion, argument and inference as any other fact in the record. A prosecuting officer certainly has the right to discuss, use and comment upon the legitimate facts in evidence, and his duty requires him to do so when called to argue a case in behalf of the State.

There is no error in this record and the judgment is affirmed.

*Affirmed.*
# EUR-Lex - 12008E302 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008E302

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - PART SIX: INSTITUTIONAL AND FINANCIAL PROVISIONS - TITLE I: INSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS - Chapter 3: The Union's advisory bodies - Section 1: The Economic and Social Committee - Article 302 (ex Article 259 TEC) **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0178 - 0178 *

Article 302

(ex Article 259 TEC)

1. The members of the Committee shall be appointed for five years The Council shall adopt the list of members drawn up in accordance with the proposals made by each Member State. The term of office of the members of the Committee shall be renewable.

2. The Council shall act after consulting the Commission. It may obtain the opinion of European bodies which are representative of the various economic and social sectors and of civil society to which the Union's activities are of concern.

--------------------------------------------------
#### Richard J. Rogers, Appellant, *v.*Village of Attica, Respondent.

(Argued April 29, 1907;

decided May 21, 1907.)

*Rogers*v. *Village of Attica,*113 App. Div. 603, affirmed.

Appeal from a judgment of the Ajipellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered *626May 10, 1906, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon the report of a referee in an action to restrain the defendant from changing the grade of a street.

*Russell J. Slone*for appellant.

*Elmer E. Charles*and *Willis E. Iloplcins*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Cray, O’Brien, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ.
Merrimack

No. 81-381

#### Edward J. Bennett v. The State of New Hampshire

March 10, 1982

*Sheehan, Phinney, Bass & Green P.A.,*of Manchester *(James E. Higgins*on the brief and orally), for the plaintiff.

*Gregory H. Smith,*attorney general *(James E. Townsend,*assistant attorney general, *& a.*on the brief, and *Peter T. Foley,*attorney, orally), for the State.

Memorandum Opinion

On July 21, 1975, the Governor and Council began proceedings which, on October 21, 1975, culminated in the removal of the plaintiff, Edward J. Bennett, from his unclassified State government position as director of the division of economic development. His appeal to this court was unsuccessful, and the United States *247Supreme Court refused to hear the case for want of a substantial federal question. *See Bennett v. Thomson,*116 N.H. 453, 363 A.2d 187 (1976), *appeal dismissed,*429 U.S. 1082 (1977).

On May 15, 1981, the plaintiff filed a petition for declaratory judgment in superior court seeking a ruling that the State be required to reimburse him for attorney’s fees incurred in his unsuccessful attempt to avoid dismissal. Upon the recommendation of a Master *(Perkins,*J., Retired), the Superior Court *(Johnson,*J.) granted the State’s motion to dismiss. This appeal followed.

The plaintiff did not request attorney’s fees during any of the legal proceedings concerning his removal. It was not until March 1980, three years and one month after the United States Supreme Court dismissed his appeal, that the plaintiff’s counsel wrote the attorney general requesting reimbursement. The plaintiff then waited until May 15, 1981, before filing his action in superior court. Thus, over four years elapsed between the time the United States Supreme Court dismissed his appeal and the time he filed his petition for attorney’s fees.

 This court recently held that, absent a statute or court rule governing the time in which attorney’s fees must be requested, a request for attorney’s fees is proper only if made within a reasonable time. *Royer v. Adams,*121 N.H. 1024, 1028, 437 A.2d 316, 319 (1981); *Silva v. Botsch,*121 N.H. 1041, 1044, 437 A.2d 313, 315 (1981). Three years and one month is clearly not a “reasonable” time. In light of this decision, we need not reach the other issues raised by the briefs.

*Affirmed.*

Brock, J., did not sit.
**U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY**



# Good Neighbor Environmental Board

**March 2**  **4 -**  **25 , 20**  **11 Mandarin Oriental**  **1330 Maryland Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC**  **20024** 

### AGENDA **Thursday, March 24, 2011** 8 : 3 0 am **Registration** 9:0 0 - 9: 3 0 **Welcome and Introduction s**   Diane Austin, Acting Chair  Cy nthia Jones
- Jackson, Acting Director, OFACMO  Mark Joyce, GNEB Acting Designated Federal Officer  Board Member Introductions 9:30 - 10:30 **Opening Remarks and General Discussion**  Nancy

Sutley, Chair White House Council on Environmental Quality 10:30 - 1 0 : 45 Break 10:45 - 11: 4 5 **Air Quality and Climate Change Along the U.S. -** **Mexico**

**Border**  Sue Stendebach, Senior Advisor on International Air Quality U.S. EPA Office of Air and Radiation  Richard Rosen, Senior Advisor for Climate Research National O ceanic and Atmospheric Administration  Diana Papoulias Research Biologist U.S. Geological Survey 11:45 - 12:00 pm **Public Comments**12: 00 - 1:30 Lunch

1:30 - 2:30 **Renewable Energy Resources in the U.S. -** **Mexico Border** 

**Region**

 Edward Drusina, Commissi oner United States Section International Boundary

and Water Commission  Edward Ho yt Principal Clean Energy

Specialist Nexant Inc.  DOE Speaker TBD 2 :30 - 3 : 3 0 **The Economic Potential of Renewable Energy Development in**

**the Border Region**  Cecilia Aguillon , Director Market Development and Government Relations KYOCERA Solar, Inc.  Stephen Niemeyer Border Affairs Manager and Colonias Coordinator Texas Commission on Environmental Quality  Todd Foley, Senior Vice President on Policy and Government Relations Ameri can Council on Renewable Energy 3 : 45 - 3 :45 Break 3:45 - 4:45 **Update on Borde r 2012 Program and Commission for** 

**Environmental Cooperation Activities**  Michelle DePass, Assistant Administrator U.S. EPA Office of International and Tribal Affairs 4 :4 5 - 6:0 0 **D iscussion of 14**  **th Report**  6:0 0 **Adjourn for the Day Friday** **, March 25**  **, 20 11**  8:0 0 am **Registration** 8:3 0 **Discussion of Options for June** **, September, and December**

**Meeting s**  9: 0 0 **Discussion of 14 th**  **Report continued**10:30 **Break**

10:45 **Discussi on of**  **1 4**  **th Report**  **c ontinued**  1 : 3 0 pm **Public Comments** 2:00 **Adjourn**
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350) Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Westech Capital
Corp. (the Company) hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:  (i)
    
    the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2003 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and(ii)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company. Dated: April 7, 2004
    
    /s/ John J. GormanJohn J. Gorman
Chief Executive Officer
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350) Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Westech Capital
Corp. (the Company) hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:  (i)
    
    the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2003 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and(ii)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company. Dated: April 7, 2004
    
    /s/ Kurt J. RechnerKurt J. Rechner
Chief Financial Officer
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 1
§ 1222.26 What are the general recordkeeping requirements for agencies? ( a ) To ensure the adequate and proper documentation of agency programs, each program must develop recordkeeping requirements that identify: ( 1 ) The record series and systems that must be created and maintained to document program policies, procedures, functions, activities, and transactions;
( 2 ) The office responsible for maintaining the record copies of those series and systems, and the applicable system administrator responsible for ensuring authenticity, protection, and ready retrieval of electronic records;
( 3 ) Related records series and systems;
( 4 ) The relationship between paper and electronic files in the same series; and
( 5 ) Policies, procedures, and strategies for ensuring that records are retained long enough to meet programmatic, administrative, fiscal, legal, and historical needs as authorized in a NARA-approved disposition schedule.
( b ) Agencies must capture, manage, and preserve electronic records with appropriate metadata and must be able to access and retrieve electronic records, including electronic messages, through electronic searches.
[74 FR 51014, Oct. 2, 2009, as amended at 87 FR 75931, Dec. 12, 2022]
#### § 1235.2 What definitions apply to this part?

See § 1220.18 of this subchapter for definitions of terms used in part 1235.
EXHIBIT 31.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Michael Zwebner, the Chief Executive Officer of Reddi Brake Supply Corporation (the ACompany@), certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of the Company;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.  I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and I have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report (the "Evaluation Date"); and



c) presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and



6. I have indicated in this report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date: September 29, 2004                                                 By: /s/ Michael Zwebner

Michael Zwebner

Chief Executive Officer
§ 1251.20 Are there any fees associated with producing records or providing testimony? ( a ) *Generally.* The General Counsel may condition the production of records or appearance for testimony upon advance payment of a reasonable estimate of the costs to NARA.
( b ) *Fees for records.* Fees for producing records include fees for searching, reviewing, and duplicating records, costs of attorney time spent in reviewing the demand or request, and expenses generated by materials and equipment used to search for, produce, and copy the responsive information. Costs for employee time are calculated on the basis of the hourly pay of the employee (including all pay, allowance, and benefits). Fees for duplication are the same as those charged by NARA in part 1258 of this title.
( c ) *Witness fees.* Fees for attendance by a witness include fees, expenses, and allowances prescribed by the court's rules. If no such fees are prescribed, witness fees are determined based upon the rule of the Federal district court closest to the location where the witness appears.
( d ) *Payment of fees.* ( 1 ) Witness fees for current NARA employees must be submitted to the General Counsel and made payable to the Treasury of the United States.
( 2 ) Fees for the production of records, including records certification fees, must be submitted to the official who makes the final determination on demands for the production of records, as described in § 1251.14, and made payable to the National Archives Trust Fund (NATF).
( 3 ) Applicable fees paid to former NARA employees providing testimony should be paid directly to the former employee in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 1821 or other applicable statutes.
( e ) *Certification (authentication) of copies of records.* NARA may certify that records are true copies in order to facilitate their use as evidence. Request certified copies from NARA at least 45 days before the date they are needed. We charge a certification fee for each document certified.
( f ) *Waiver or reduction of fees.* The General Counsel, in his or her sole discretion, may, upon a showing of good cause, waive or reduce any fees in connection with the testimony, production, or certification of records.
( g ) *De minimis fees.* Fees are not assessed if the total charge is $10.00 or less, or as otherwise stated in NARA policy.