alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EUR-Lex - 12006E148 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12006E148

**Treaty establishing the European Community (consolidated version) - Part Three - Community policies - TITLE XI - Social policy, education, vocational training and youth - Chapter 2 - The European Social Fund - Article 148 **

*
Official Journal C 321 E , 29/12/2006 P. 0112 - 0112 Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0097 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0244 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0046 - Consolidated version (EEC Treaty - no official publication available) *

Article 148

The Council, acting in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 251 and after consulting the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, shall adopt implementing decisions relating to the European Social Fund.

--------------------------------------------------
**Exhibit 21**
SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
Note: Unless otherwise noted, the Registrant owns 100% of the equity interest in each of thesubsidiaries.
INCORPORATED OR ORGANIZED IN MINNESOTA   RCC Atlantic, Inc. RCC Atlantic Long Distance, Inc. RCC Atlantic Licenses, LLC RCC Minnesota, Inc. RCC Network, Inc. RCC Paging, Inc. RCC Holdings, Inc. RCC Transport, Inc. Wireless Alliance, LLC (Registrant has a 70% interest in this entity) TLA Spectrum, LLC RGI Group, Inc.
INCORPORATED OR ORGANIZED IN DELAWARE   BMCT Equipment Company, LLC Ferry Equipment Company, LLC
INCORPORATED OR ORGANIZED IN VERMONT   Alexandria Indemnity, Inc.
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 45623

STATE OF IDAHO ,

Plaintiff

- Respondent ,

v.

KIM C. SUMMERS ,

Defendant

- Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Filed: September 5, 2018

Karel A. Lehrman, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED OPINION AND SHALL NOT BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Seventh Judicial District, State of Idaho, Bonneville County. Hon. Joel E. Tingey , District Judge.

O rder denying Ida ho Criminal Rule 35, affirmed

. Eric D. Fredericksen, State Appellate Public Defender; Justin M. Curtis , Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming , Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.

________________________________________________ Before GRATTON, Chief Judge; HUSKEY, Judge; and LORELLO, Judge

________________________________________________

Kim C. Summers pleaded guilty to possession of a controlled substance,
methamphetamine , Idaho Code § 37

- 2732(c)(1) . The district court i mposed a unified sentence of

seven years, with two years determinate. The district court retained ju risdiction and ordered Summers to report to the jail a few days after imposition of sentence to serve his period of
retained jurisdiction . Summers failed to repo rt to jail . A bench warrant was issued and eventually S ummers was arrested. The district cou rt relinquished jurisdiction and executed the
underly ing sentence. Summers filed an untimely Idaho Criminal Rule 35 motion, which the

district court denied. Summers appeals.2 Idaho Criminal Rule 35 provides that a district court has discretion to co nsider and act upon a motion filed within 120 days of the order re linquishing jurisdiction . The filing limitations
provided by I.C.R. 35 are a jurisdictional limit on the authority of the court to consider the motion and, unless filed within the period, a district court lacks jurisdiction to grant any relief.

State v. Sutton , 113 Idaho 832, 833, 748 P.2d 416, 417 (Ct. App. 1987). In t his case, Summer acknowledges that his I.C.R. 35 motion for reduction of sentence was untimely. Because

Summer ’s I.C.R. 35 motion was not filed within the 120

- day limitation provided by the rule, the district court lacked jurisdiction to consider it. Acc ordingly, we do not address the merits of
Summary ’s I.C.R. 35 motion. Therefore, the district court’s order denying Summer ’s I.C.R. 35

motion is affirmed.
# EUR-Lex - 12007P043 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12007P043

**Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - TITLE V - CITIZENS' RIGHTS - Article 43 - European Ombudsman **

*
Official Journal 303 , 14/12/2007 P. 0011 - 0011 *

Article 43

European Ombudsman

Any citizen of the Union and any natural or legal person residing or having its registered office in a Member State has the right to refer to the European Ombudsman cases of maladministration in the activities of the institutions, bodies, offices or agencies of the Union, with the exception of the Court of Justice of the European Union acting in its judicial role.

--------------------------------------------------
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Salon Media Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the “Report”), I, Richard Gingras, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







August 13, 2010


/s/ Richard
Gingras


Richard
Gingras


Chief
Executive Officer
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN I1 

OROVER SELLERS 

ATrORNLY GENER& 
Iiononblo T. M. ‘Mmblo, page 2 

are roqulnd to do, and mu8t lwvo l vldmme of pryfiCitUl0~ iii Nnl mhool 8U~Z’Ti8;~ and -8t b8 the 

holder of a t lu8t l Ewhalor of Soleaoo %gnr or 

-j hlghor. Such 8UpW'Vi8Ol' Or a~PV18Ol’W =J IWWiVB 

Of 5Ot t0 UC0.d %+VOBtJ-8iI tburdrvd blbX.8 

I' azLau, to k mid Out Oi the 8W flUad 

and’ln the aawmaanoP8m thtoitha County SuporlntOlldOSit Of F'ublio b8tl'Wt~lon aad 0th.P &88;8tNt8.’ 

A8 VO CoPstFW SrLd SW3tiOS 2, 8Upm. th. 8ChOQ’l 8-W 

visor amtimed thanin 18 not a public offioormvlth 8 dmflnite 

fiXOd t.rP but 18 lWF.17 Ub -lOJW. 

very tml~ youril, 

ASTORXXY aBmERALoFTxxAs
###### Editorial Note on [Part 159](/current/title-33/part-159?toc=1)

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 159 appear by USCG-2008-0179, [73 FR 35015](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/73-FR-35015), June 19, 2008.

#### § 159.125 Visible floating solids: Type I devices.

During the sewage processing test ([§ 159.121](/on/2024-09-23/title-33/section-159.121)) 40 effluent samples of approximately 1 liter each shall be taken from a Type I device at the same time as samples taken in [§ 159.123](/on/2024-09-23/title-33/section-159.123) and passed expeditiously through a U.S. Sieve No. 12 as specified in ASTM E 11 (incorporated by reference, see [§ 159.4](/on/2024-09-23/title-33/section-159.4)). The weight of the material retained on the screen after it has been dried to a constant weight in an oven at 103 °C. must be divided by the volume of the sample and expressed as milligrams per liter. This value must be 10 percent or less of the total suspended solids as determined in accordance with [40 CFR Part 136](/on/2024-09-23/title-40/part-136) or at least 38 of the 40 samples.

Note:

[33 U.S.C. 1321(b)(3)](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/33/1321) prohibits discharge of harmful quantities of oil into or upon the navigable waters of the United States or adjoining shorelines or into or upon the waters of the contiguous zone. Under [40 CFR 110.3](/on/2024-09-23/title-40/section-110.3) and [110.4](/on/2024-09-23/title-40/section-110.4) such discharges of oil include discharges which:

(a) Violate applicable water quality standards, or

(b) Cause a film or sheen upon or discoloration of the surface of the water or adjoining shorelines or cause a sludge or emulsion to be deposited beneath the surface of the water or upon adjoining shorelines. If a sample contains a quantity of oil determined to be harmful, the Coast Guard will not certify the device.

[CGD 73-83, [40 FR 4624](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/40-FR-4624), Jan. 30, 1975, as amended by CGD 75-213, [41 FR 15326](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/41-FR-15326), Apr. 12, 1976; USCG-1999-5151, [64 FR 67176](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/64-FR-67176), Dec. 1, 1999]
EXHIBIT
32





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Integrated Environmental Technologies,
Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, William E. Prince, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.








/S/
      William E. PrinceWilliam
      E. PrinceChief
      Executive Officer andPrincipal
      Financial OfficerAugust
      12, 2010
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule  contains  summary  financial  information  extracted from Westech
Capital  Corp.  financial  statements  for the year ended  June 30,  1999 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         6,498
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               6,498
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 6,498
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          3,382
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       183
<OTHER-SE>                                     2,933
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   6,498
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               8,348
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (8,348)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   680
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (9,028)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (9,028)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.05)



</TABLE>
§ 230.8 Acquisition requirements. ( a ) Prior to closing on an acquisition, grant recipients participating in the Community Forest Program must complete the following, which applies to all tracts, including cost share tracts: ( 1 ) Complete an appraisal: ( i ) For lands purchased with Community Forest Program funds, the appraisal must comply with Federal appraisal standards prior to the release of the grant funds. The grant recipient must provide documentation that the appraisal and associated appraisal review were conducted in a manner consistent with the Federal appraisal standards.
( ii ) For donated cost share tracts, the market value must be determined by an independent appraiser. The value needs to be documented by a responsible official of the party to which the property is donated.
( 2 ) Notify the landowner in writing of the appraised value of the property and that the sale is voluntary. If the grant recipient has a voluntary option for less than appraised value, they do not have to renegotiate the agreement.
( 3 ) Purchase all surface and subsurface mineral rights whenever possible. However, if severed mineral rights cannot be obtained, the grant recipient must follow the retention of qualified mineral interest requirements outlined in the Internal Revenue Service regulations (26 CFR 1.170A-14(g)(4)), which address both surface and subsurface minerals.
( 4 ) Ensure that title to lands acquired conforms to title standards applicable to State land acquisitions where the land is located: ( i ) Title to lands acquired using Community Forest Program funds must not be subject to encumbrances or agreements of any kind that would be contrary to the purpose of the Community Forest Program.
( ii ) Title insurance must not be a substitute for acceptable title.
( 5 ) The grant recipient must provide all necessary due diligence documentation to regional Forest Service program managers and allow at least 60 days for review and acceptance.
( b ) At closing, record a Notice of Grant Requirement with the deed in the lands record of the local county or municipality. This document must: ( 1 ) State that the property (including cost share tracts) was purchased with Community Forest Program funds;
( 2 ) Provide a legal description;
( 3 ) Identify the name and address of the grant recipient who is the authorized title holder;
( 4 ) State the purpose of the Community Forest Program;
( 5 ) Reference the Grant Agreement with the Forest Service (title and agreement number) and the address where it is kept on file;
( 6 ) State that the grant recipient confirms its obligation to manage the interest in real property pursuant to the grant, the Community Forest Plan, and the purpose of the Community Forest Program;
( 7 ) State that the community forest may not be sold and will not be conveyed or transferred to another eligible entity or encumbered in whole or in part, to another party without permission and instructions from the Forest Service; and
( 8 ) State that the grant recipient will manage the interest in real property consistent with the purpose of the Community Forest Program.
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                   AS ADDED BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly  Report of  International  Wireless,  Inc.
(the  "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Thom Miller, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.ss. 1350, as added by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     A.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     B.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.



                                          By: /s/ Thomas C. Miller
                                          -----------------------------------
                                          Thomas C. Miller
                                          Chief Executive Officer
                                          January 5, 2004
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-6733

JOHN L. SHERER, Petitioner - Appellant, versus COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA-00-664-7) Submitted: August 23, 2001 Decided: August 30, 2001 Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John L. Sherer, Appellant Pro Se. Robert H. Anderson, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: John L. Sherer appeals the district court’s order denying relief without prejudice on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition claiming that he has been denied the right to a speedy trial. Even if the district court had jurisdiction over Sherer’s pretrial habeas corpus petition, Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court , 410 U.S. 484, 489 (1973), Sherer has been declared incompetent so it would not be possible to move forward with the trial. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
§ 1290.2 Scope of additional records and information. The term *additional records and information* includes: ( a ) All documents used by government offices and agencies during their declassification review of assassination records as well as all other documents, indices, and other material (including but not limited to those that disclose cryptonyms, code names, or other identifiers that appear in assassination records) that the Assassination Records Review Board (Review Board) has a reasonable basis to believe may constitute an assassination record or would assist in the identification, evaluation or interpretation of an assassination record. The Review Board will identify in writing those records and other materials it intends to seek under this section.
( b ) All training manuals, instructional materials, and guidelines created or used by the agencies in furtherance of their review of assassination records.
( c ) All records, lists, and documents describing the procedure by which the agencies identified or selected assassination records for review.
( d ) Organizational charts of government agencies.
( e ) Records necessary and sufficient to describe the agency's: ( 1 ) Records policies and schedules;
( 2 ) Filing systems and organization;
( 3 ) Storage facilities and locations;
( 4 ) Indexing symbols, marks, codes, instructions, guidelines, methods, and procedures;
( 5 ) Search methods and procedures used in the performance of the agencies' duties under the JFK Act; and
( 6 ) Reclassification to a higher level, transfer, destruction, or other information (e.g., theft) regarding the status of assassination records.
( f ) Any other record that does not fall within the scope of assassination record as described in § 1290.1, but which has the potential to enhance, enrich, and broaden the historical record of the assassination.
[60 FR 33349, June 28, 1995. Redesignated at 65 FR 39550, June 27, 2000, as amended at 66 FR 18873, Apr. 12, 2001]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 5574]

In accordance with section 4314(c)(4) of the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 (Pub. L. 95-454), the Executive Resources Board of the Department of State has appointed the following individuals to the Department of State Performance Review Board (At-Large):

Susan Burk, Deputy Coordinator for Homeland Security, Office of the Secretary, Department of State;

John Kim, Assistant Legal Adviser for Treaty Affairs, Office of Legal Adviser, Department of State;

William Todd, Deputy Inspector General, Office of the Inspector General, Department of State;

Gretchen Welch, Director, Office of Policy, Planning and Resources, Office of the Under Secretary for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs, Department of State; (Outside Member)

Ruth Whiteside, Director, Office of the Director, Foreign Service Institute, Department of State;

Dated: September 15, 2006.

George M. Staples,

Director General of the Foreign Service and Director of Human Resources, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 06-8537  Filed 10-11-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-15-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          28,641
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      215
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      5,466
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                35,084
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  35,084
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,500
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           401
<OTHER-SE>                                      33,183
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    35,084
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,205
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,205)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,205)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,205)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)


</TABLE>
#### § 18.1 What is the authority and purpose for this part?

16 U.S.C. 1 *et seq.,* particularly 16 U.S.C. 1a-2(k), and, 16 U.S.C. 470h-3 are the authorities for this part. These authorities allow the Director (or delegated officials) to lease certain federally owned or administered property located within the boundaries of park areas. All leases to be entered into by the Director under these authorities are subject to the requirements of this part, except that, proposed leases that were solicited pursuant to this part prior to January 28, 2002, may be executed in accordance with the terms of the solicitation.