alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Sorenson v. Donahoe.

1. Service oí a copy oí a notice of appeal from a justice’s court to the circuit confers no jurisdiction on the county court, though the original notice designate that court instead of the circuit court.

2. Where the county court obtains no jurisdiction of an appeal from a justice’s court because the notice of appeal is insufficient, it cannot affirm; it can only dismiss.

(Opinion filed July 12, 1899.)

*604Appeal from Minnehaha county court. Hon. W. A. Wilkes, Judge.

Action in justice’s court by Louis Sorenson against Den Donahoe. There was a judgment for plaintiff, and an appeal was .dismissed by the county court, which also affirmed, the judgment, and defendant appeals.

Modified.

The facts are stated in the opinion.

*G. B. Krause,*for appellant.

*P. J. Bocjde*and *G. P. Bates,*for respondent.

Fuller, J.

The following are the facts and circumstances upon which a notice of appeal from a justice of the peace to the county court'was held insufficient to confer jurisdiction: After the entry of judgment lor plaintiff in justice court, and within the time provided by law, defendant’s counsel served his notice of appeal uppn one of the attorneys for plaintiff by delivering to him the following copy, the receipt of which was duly admitted on the original: “Please take notice that the defendant in the above-entitled actipn appeals from the whole of the judgment rendered and entered therein on the 30th day of November, A. D. 1897, in favor of said plaintiff and against said defendant, for the sum of seventy-five dollars, debt and damage, and costs taxed at twenty-nine and 40-100 dollars, to the circuit court. Second judicial - circuit, in and for Minnehaha county, upon questions of law and fact, and demands a new trial. ” The principal contention arises over the fact that the circuit court, instead of the county court, is designated in the copy as the forum to which the appeal was taken, and, upon the face of the original notice of appeal, pen marks are drawn over the typewritten woi'd ‘ ‘circuit, ” and the word ‘ ‘coun*605ty,” written with pen and ink appears above the line. From the sharply conflicting testimony concerning the point, a finding by the trial court, either that this change was made before the original notice of appeal was served or not until a later time, would be amply sustained; and, be that as it may, the copy served in the manner provided by section 6129 of the Compiled Laws, and upon which respondent rightfully relied, was a notice of appeal to the circuit court, and conferred no jurisdiction upon the county court, No argument or citation of authority is needed in support of a point so obviously beyond controversy. As the dismissal of the appeal operated merely to remit the parties to such legal rights as may be found to exist, the county court was without jurisdiction to affirm upon its merits the judgment rendered by the justice of the peace, and its action with reference thereto should be vacated and set aside. Thus modified, the judgment appealed fr«m is affirmed.
# EUR-Lex - 12004V347 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V347

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART III — THE POLICIES AND FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - TITLE VI — THE FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - CHAPTER I — PROVISIONS GOVERNING THE INSTITUTIONS - Section 1 — The institutions - Subsection 4 — The European Commission - Article III-347 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0154 - 0154 *

Article III-347

The members of the Commission shall refrain from any action incompatible with their duties. Member States shall respect their independence and shall not seek to influence them in the performance of their tasks.

The members of the Commission shall not, during their term of office, engage in any other occupation, whether gainful or not. When entering upon their duties they shall give a solemn undertaking that, both during and after their term of office, they will respect the obligations arising therefrom and in particular their duty to behave with integrity and discretion as regards the acceptance, after they have ceased to hold office, of certain appointments or benefits. In the event of any breach of these obligations, the Court of Justice may, on application by the Council, acting by a simple majority, or the Commission, rule that the person concerned be, according to the circumstances, either compulsorily retired in accordance with Article III-349 or deprived of his or her right to a pension or other benefits in its stead.

--------------------------------------------------
§ 80.83 What is the Federal share of allowable costs? ( a ) The Regional Director must provide at least 10 percent and no more than 75 percent of the allowable costs of a grant-funded project to the fish and wildlife agencies of the 50 States. The Regional Director generally approves any Federal share from 10 to 75 percent as proposed by one of the 50 States if the: ( 1 ) Funds are available; and
( 2 ) Application is complete and consistent with laws, regulations, and policies.
( b ) The Regional Director may provide funds to the District of Columbia to pay 75 to 100 percent of the allowable costs of a grant-funded project in a program or subprogram authorized by the Dingell-Johnson Sport Fish Restoration Act. The Regional Director decides on the specific Federal share between 75 and 100 percent based on what he or she decides is fair, just, and equitable. The Regional Director may reduce the Federal share to less than 75 percent of allowable project costs only if the District of Columbia voluntarily provides match to pay the remaining allowable costs. However, the Regional Director must not reduce the Federal share below 10 percent unless he or she follows the procedure at paragraph (d) of this section.
( c ) The Regional Director may provide funds to pay 75 to 100 percent of the allowable costs of a project funded by a grant to a fish and wildlife agency of the Commonwealths of Puerto Rico and the Northern Mariana Islands and the territories of Guam, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and American Samoa. The Regional Director decides on the specific Federal share between 75 and 100 percent based on what he or she decides is fair, just, and equitable. The Regional Director may reduce the Federal share to less than 75 percent of allowable project costs only if the Commonwealth or territorial fish and wildlife agency voluntarily provides match to pay the remaining allowable costs. However, the Regional Director must not reduce the Federal share below 10 percent unless he or she follows the procedure at paragraph (d) of this section. The Federal share of allowable costs for a grant-funded project for the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands and the territories of Guam, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and American Samoa may be affected by the waiver process described at § 80.84(c).
( d ) The Regional Director may waive the 10-percent minimum Federal share of allowable costs if the State, District of Columbia, Commonwealth, or territory requests a waiver and provides compelling reasons to justify why it is necessary for the Federal government to fund less than 10 percent of the allowable costs of a project.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

          - [Transmittal No. 06-66]

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 July 1996.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. J. Hurd, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 604-6575.

The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Transmittal 06-66 with attached transmittal, policy justification, and Sensitivity of Technology.

Dated: October 3, 2006.

C.R. Choate,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

      ( print page 59464)          ( print page 59465)          ( print page 59466)          ( print page 59467)          ( print page 59468)    

BILLING CODE 5001-06-M

[FR Doc. 06-8550  Filed 10-6-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
#### § 1005.13 Nuisances.

The creation or maintenance of a nuisance upon the federally owned lands of the area administered by the Presidio Trust or upon any private lands within the boundaries of the area administered by the Presidio Trust under the exclusive legislative jurisdiction of the United States is prohibited.
#### § 1600.28 Preservation of records.

The Foundation will preserve all correspondence pertaining to the requests that it receives under this subpart, as well as copies of all requested records, until disposition or destruction is authorized by title 44 of the United States Code or the National Archives and Records Administration's General Records Schedule 14. Records will not be disposed of while they are the subject of a pending request, appeal, or lawsuit under the Act.
#### § 1915.1028 Benzene.

Note:

The requirements applicable to shipyard employment under this section are identical to those set forth at [§ 1910.1028 of this chapter](/on/2024-09-23/title-29/section-1910.1028).

[[61 FR 31431](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/61-FR-31431), June 20, 1996]
Total U.S. Exports of Textile and Apparel Products by Country

----
# EUR-Lex - 12008E221 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008E221

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - PART FIVE: EXTERNAL ACTION BY THE UNION - TITLE VI: THE UNION'S RELATIONS WITH INTERNATIONAL ORGANISATIONS AND THIRD COUNTRIES AND UNION DELEGATIONS - Article 221 **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0147 - 0147 *

Article 221

1. Union delegations in third countries and at international organisations shall represent the Union.

2. Union delegations shall be placed under the authority of the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy. They shall act in close cooperation with Member States' diplomatic and consular missions.

--------------------------------------------------
# EUR-Lex - 12008E268 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008E268

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - PART SIX: INSTITUTIONAL AND FINANCIAL PROVISIONS - TITLE I: INSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS - Chapter 1: The institutions - Section 5: The Court of Justice of the European Union - Article 268 (ex Article 235 TEC) **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0164 - 0164 *

Article 268

(ex Article 235 TEC)

The Court of Justice of the European Union shall have jurisdiction in disputes relating to compensation for damage provided for in the second and third paragraphs of Article 340.

--------------------------------------------------
#### § 1009.3 Denial of claims.

Denial of a claim shall be communicated as provided by 28 CFR 14.9.
______________________ ________________ 

July 17, 2023 

TWO WAY MEMORANDUM 

TO: OGC Docket 

FROM: Anh Vuong 

Financial Analyst 

SUBJECT: Account Determination for Funds Received 

We recently received a check from Levant Hotel Holdings Inc The check number is 1574. 

Dated 7/05/2023 in the amount of $13,750.00 a copy of the receipt and all correspondence are 

attached. Please indicate below which account the funds should be deposited and give the 

MUR/Case number and name associated with the deposit. 

====================================================== 

TO: Anh Vuong 

Financial Analyst 

FROM: OGC Docket 

SUBJECT: Disposition of Funds Received 

In reference to the above check in the amount of $_BBBBB  ______,

The MUR/Case number is______________ and in the name of __________  %DVKDU

__________________________________ . :DOL

Please this deposit in the account indicated below: 

___[ Civil Penalties Account, 95-1099.160 

___ Miscellaneous Receipt Account, 95-3220.160 

(Disgorgement) 

Digitally signed by Christal Christal Dennis 

Date: 2023.07.17 Dennis 10:57:13 -04'00' 

Signature Date 

MUR809200111
MUR809200112
# EUR-Lex - 12006E100 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12006E100

**Treaty establishing the European Community (consolidated version) - Part Three - Community policies - TITLE VII - Economic and monetary policy - Article 100 **

*
Official Journal C 321 E , 29/12/2006 P. 0083 - 0083 Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0072 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0216 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0034 - Consolidated version *

Article 100

1. Without prejudice to any other procedures provided for in this Treaty, the Council, acting by a qualified majority on a proposal from the Commission, may decide upon the measures appropriate to the economic situation, in particular if severe difficulties arise in the supply of certain products.

2. Where a Member State is in difficulties or is seriously threatened with severe difficulties caused by natural disasters or exceptional occurrences beyond its control, the Council, acting by a qualified majority on a proposal from the Commission, may grant, under certain conditions, Community financial assistance to the Member State concerned. The President of the Council shall inform the European Parliament of the decision taken.

--------------------------------------------------
#### § 1600.29 Fees.

The Foundation will charge fees for duplication of records under the Privacy Act in the same way in which it charges duplication fees under § 1600.10. No search or review fee will be charged for any record.
# EUR-Lex - 12008E055 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008E055

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - PART THREE: UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS - TITLE IV: FREE MOVEMENT OF PERSONS, SERVICES AND CAPITAL - Chapter 2: Right of establishment - Article 55 (ex Article 294 TEC) **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0069 - 0069 *

Article 55

(ex Article 294 TEC)

Member States shall accord nationals of the other Member States the same treatment as their own nationals as regards participation in the capital of companies or firms within the meaning of Article 54, without prejudice to the application of the other provisions of the Treaties.

--------------------------------------------------
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-6075

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

LORI D. BLAKELY,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 04-6076

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

LORI D. BLAKELY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge.

(CR-95-851; CR-97-678; CA-02-4186-2-18; CA-02-4187-3-18)

Submitted: June 24, 2004 Decided: June 30, 2004

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
- 2 -

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lori D. Blakely, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Rhett DeHart, Assistant

United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 3 -

PER CURIAM:

Lori D. Blakely seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying some of the claims raised in her 28 U.S.C. § 2255

(2000) motion. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over

final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory

and collateral orders. 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed. R. Civ. P.

54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949).

The order Blakely seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an

appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we

dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction and deny a certificate

of appealability. We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
§ 223.100 Award to highest bidder. The sale of advertised timber shall be awarded to the responsible bidder submitting the highest bid that conforms to the conditions of the sale as stated in the prospectus unless: ( a ) Determination is made to reject all bids.
( b ) Two or more bidders, all of whom meet the requirements, submit equal bids which are the highest bids, in which case award may be by the drawing of lots. Equal bids from parties having direct or indirect common control or association in logging, processing or marketing may be consolidated to the extent deemed necessary by the awarding officer in order to give to any others who have bid the same amount an equitable opportunity in the drawing of lots.
( c ) The highest bidder is notoriously or habitually careless with fire.
( d ) Monopoly, injurious to the public welfare, would result from the control of large amounts of public or of public and private timber.
( e ) The high bidder has elected Forest Service road construction in response to an advertisement extending such an option, the Forest Service cannot perform the construction and in response to solicitation has not received a satisfactory bid for such construction within the period stated in the prospectus and the high timber sale bidder is unwilling to perform the construction.
[44 FR 73029, Dec. 17, 1979. Redesignated at 49 FR 2761, Jan. 23, 1984, and amended at 50 FR 32696, Aug. 14, 1985; 53 FR 33132, Aug. 30, 1988]
#### § 1005.2 Alcoholic beverages; sale of intoxicants.

The sale of alcoholic, spirituous, vinous, or fermented liquor, containing more than 1 percent of alcohol by weight, shall conform with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws and regulations. (See also § 1002.35 of this chapter.)
Exhibit 23.1

                         Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the  incorporation  by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
of Maverick Tube  Corporation  of our report dated  February 1, 2002 (except for
paragraph 4 of Note 5 and Note 17, as to which the dates are  February  25, 2002
and  February  12, 2002,  respectively),  included in the 2001 Annual  Report to
Stockholders of Maverick Tube Corporation.

Our audits also  included  the  financial  statement  schedule of Maverick  Tube
Corporation  listed in Item 14(a).  This schedule is the  responsibility  of the
Company's  management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our
audits. In our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above, when
considered  in  relation  to the basic  financial  statements  taken as a whole,
presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-3 No. 33-56568,  Form S-3 No. 333-61292 and Form S-3 No.  333-83478) and
in the related Prospectuses of Maverick Tube Corporation and in the Registration
Statements  (Form  S-8 No.  33-89526,  Form  S-8  No.  333-52621,  Form  S-8 No.
333-30696,  and  Form  S-8  No.  333-46740)  pertaining  to  the  Maverick  Tube
Corporation  Amended and  Restated  1990 Stock Option  Plan,  the Maverick  Tube
Corporation 1994 Stock Option Plan, the Maverick Tube Corporation Director Stock
Option Plan, the Maverick Tube  Corporation 1999 Director Stock Option Plan, and
the Amended and  Restated  Prudential  Steel Ltd.  Stock Option Plan of Maverick
Tube  Corporation  of our reports dated February 1, 2002 (except for paragraph 4
of Note 5 and Note 17, as to which the dates are  February 25, 2002 and February
12, 2002,  respectively),  with respect to the consolidated financial statements
and schedule of Maverick Tube Corporation included and incorporated by reference
in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2001.


                                                  /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP


St. Louis, Missouri
March 11, 2002
§ 80.130 Does an agency have to hold title to real property acquired under a grant? A State fish and wildlife agency must hold title to an ownership interest in real property acquired under a grant to the extent possible under State law. ( a ) Some States do not authorize their fish and wildlife agency to hold the title to real property that the agency manages. In these cases, the State or one of its administrative units may hold the title to grant-funded real property as long as the agency has the authority to manage the real property for its authorized purpose under the grant. The agency, the State, or another administrative unit of State government must not hold title to an undivided ownership interest in the real property concurrently with a subgrantee or any other entity.
( b ) An ownership interest is an interest in real property that gives the person who holds it the right to use and occupy a parcel of land or water and to exclude others. Ownership interests include fee and leasehold interests but not easements.
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: 2007 -NM- 332 -AD

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a "significant regulatory action"?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)
### IN THE UNI TED STATES COURT OFAPPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

No. 11-20214 Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee

v. JOSE ALBERTO MUNOZ VILLALON, als o k n o w n as Jose A. Munoz, also known as Jose Alberto Munoz, also known as Jose Alberton Munoz-Villalon, also known as Jose Munoz, also known as Jose Abberto Munoz Villalon, Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:10-CR-719-1
Before BENAVIDES, STEWART, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Jose Alberto Munoz Villalon (Munoz) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders

v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Munoz has f iled a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the rec ord reflected therein, as well as Munoz’s response. U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s

F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D Novembe r 29, 20 11 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C IR
. R. 47.5 , the cour t hasd ete rm inedthat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t forth in 5 T H C IR
. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 11-20214 Document: 00511678270 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/29/2011No. 11-20214

We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See5 T H C I R
. R. 42.2.

2 Case: 11-20214 Document: 00511678270 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/29/2011