alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 31.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Dean L. Julia, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Ace Marketing &
Promotions, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer (if any) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

         a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

         b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

         a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

         b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.

DATE: August 9, 2007                      /S/ DEAN L. JULIA
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          DEAN L. JULIA, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T B L AN C A B E AT R I Z T UC UX , P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 07- 73031 A ge nc yN o. A 072- 536- 415 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d D e c e m be r14, 2010 ** B efo re: G O O D W IN , W A L L A C E , an dT H O M A S , C i rcu i tJu d g es. B l anc aB e a tr i z T uc ux, ana t i ve and c i t i z e n of G ua t e m a l a , pe t i t i ons pr o s e f or r e v ie w o f

th e B o ar do f

I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls ’ ( “B I A ” ) o r d e rd e n y in g h e rm o tio n to t erm i nat e procee di ng s. W e have j uri sdi ct i on un der 8 U . S . C . § 1 25 2. W e r evi ew de novo que s t i ons of

l aw and c l a i m s of

c ons t i tut i ona l vi ol a t i ons i n i m m i gr a t i on



# FI LED JAN 06 2 011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS07- 73031 2 p r o c e e d in g s , I

tu rr i b a rr i a v . I

NS , 321 F . 3d 889, 894 ( 9th C i r . 2003) , and w e de ny th e p e t i t i o n f

o rr e v i e w. T h e B I A d idn o t e rro rv io la te du e p r o c e s s in d e n y in g T u c u x ’s m o tio n to t erm i nat e w here she f

ai l ed t o d em on strat e thatshe f i l ed a t i m el y m ot i on t o reopen oran appl i c a t i on f

ors us pe ns i on of

de port a t i on r e qui r e d f

orr e l i e f unde rthe N ic ar a g u an A d

ju s tm e n t an dC e n tr a l A m e r ic an R e lie f A c t. See 8 C .F .R . § 1 0 0 3 .4 3 ( e ) ( 1 ) , ( 2 ) ; s e e a l s o La ta v . I

NS , 204 F . 3d 1241, 1246 ( 9th C i r . 2000) (r equi ri ng error and prej ud i ce for apet i t i on ert o p re vai l on a due process cl ai m ). P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**1606 KA 09-00321**  PRESENT: MARTOCHE, J.P., FAHEY, CARNI, LINDLEY, AND SCONIERS, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
ROY HOOTEN, ALSO KNOWN AS ROY D. HOOTEN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 2.)

GARY A. HORTON, PUBLIC DEFENDER, BATAVIA (BRIDGET L. FIELD OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
LAWRENCE FRIEDMAN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BATAVIA (WILLIAM G. ZICKL OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Genesee County Court (Robert C. Noonan, J.), rendered January 13, 2009. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted burglary in the third degree. It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Same Memorandum as in People v Hooten ([appeal No. 1] ___ AD3d ___ [Feb. 10, 2011]).

Entered: February 10, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan Clerk of the Court
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 234 (Wednesday, December 5, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 72346]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-29257]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK OF THE UNITED STATES

Notice of Open Special Meeting of the Sub-Saharan Africa Advisory 
Committee of the Export-Import Bank of the United States (Ex-Im Bank)

SUMMARY: The Sub-Saharan Africa Advisory Committee was established by 
Public Law 105-121, November 26, 1997, to advise the Board of Directors 
on the development and implementation of policies and programs designed 
to support the expansion of Ex-Im Bank's financial commitments in Sub-
Saharan Africa under its loan, guarantee, and insurance programs. 
Further, the Committee shall make recommendations on how Ex-Im Bank can 
facilitate greater support by U.S. commercial banks for trade with Sub-
Saharan Africa.
    Time and Place: Monday, December 17, 2012, between 10:30 a.m. and 
12:30 p.m. Security processing will be necessary for reentry into the 
building. The meeting will be held at Ex-Im Bank in the Main Conference 
Room 326, 811 Vermont Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20571.
    Agenda: Presentation on recent developments in Sub-Saharan Africa 
markets by Ex-Im Bank staff; an update on Ex-Im Bank's on-going 
business development initiatives in the region; and Committee 
discussion of current challenges and opportunities for U.S. exporters.
    Public Participation: The meeting will be open to public 
participation and the last 10 minutes will be set aside for oral 
questions or comments. Members of the public may also file written 
statement(s) before or after the meeting. If you plan to attend, a 
photo ID must be presented at the guard's desk as part of the clearance 
process into the building and you may contact Exa Richards to be placed 
on an attendee list. If any person wishes auxiliary aids (e.g., a sign 
language interpreter) or other special accommodations, please contact, 
prior to December 5, 2012, Exa Richards, 811 Vermont Avenue NW., 
Washington, DC 20571, (202) 565-3455.

Further Information: For further information, please contact Exa 
Richards, 811 Vermont Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20571; (202) 565-3455.

Lisa V. Terry,
Assistant General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2012-29257 Filed 12-4-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6690-01-P
```
§ 2.61 Residing on Federal lands. ( a ) Residing in park areas, other than on privately owned lands, except pursuant to the terms and conditions of a permit, lease or contract, is prohibited.
( b ) Violation of the terms and conditions of a permit issued in accordance with this section is prohibited and may result in the suspension or revocation of the permit.
#### § 13.104 Definitions.

The following definitions apply to this subpart:

*Cabin* means a small, usually one-story dwelling of simple construction, completely enclosed, with a roof and walls which may have windows and door(s).

*Claimant* means a person who has occupied and used a cabin or other structure as a primary, permanent residence for a substantial portion of the time, and who, when absent, has the intention of returning to it as his/her primary, permanent residence. Factors demonstrating a person's primary, permanent residence include, but are not limited to documentary evidence, e.g. the permanent address indicated on licenses issued by the State of Alaska and tax returns and the location where the person is registered to vote.

*Immediate family member* means a claimant's spouse, or a grandparent, parent, brother, sister, child or adopted child of a claimant or of the claimant's spouse.

*Possessory interest* means the partial or total ownership of a cabin or structure.

*Right of occupancy* means a valid claim to use or reside in a cabin or other structure.

*Shelter* means a structure designed to provide temporary relief from the elements and is characterized as a lean-to having one side open.

*Substantial portion of the time* means at least 50 percent of the time since beginning occupancy and at least 4 (four) consecutive months of continuous occupancy in every calendar year after 1986.

*Temporary campsite* means a natural, undeveloped area suitable for the purpose of overnight occupancy without modification.

*Temporary facility* means a structure or other manmade improvement that can be readily and completely dismantled and/or removed from the site when the authorized use terminates. The term does not include a cabin.

*Tent platform* means a structure, usually made of manufactured timber products, constructed to provide a solid, level floor for a tent, with or without partial walls not exceeding three feet in height above the floor, and having only the tent fabric, the ridge pole and its support poles extending higher than three feet above the floor.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, D.C.

Aircraft Management Services, Inc. Complainant

v. Santa Rosa County, Florida (sponsoring PeterPrince Field) Respondent FAA Docket No. 16-12-02

NOTICE OF EXTENSION OF TIME

This matter is before the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) based on the abovereferenced complaint, filed in accordance with FAA Rules of Practice for Federally-Assisted AirportEnforcementProceedings, 14 CFR, Part 16. Pursuant to 14 CFR, Part 16, subpart B, the date by which the Director's Determination will be issued inthis matter is hereby extended to January 19, 2015. An extension oftime is necessary and appropriate for a fair and complete determination in this case.



# ~-t2 **~)~m'J** {r, Randall·

. Fiertz Director ofOffice ofAirport Compliance and Management Analysis 

# 10·17 DateCERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

# l"li'IL- t- I HEREBY CERTIFYthat on October

## -l--1--, 2014, I caused to beplaced in the United States mail (first class mail, postage paid) a true copy ofthe FAA's Request for Additional Information and Notice ofExtension ofTime, addressed to: For Complainant Ryan P. Hatler Michael J. Schofield Clark, Partington, Hart, Larry, Bond & Stackhouse 125 West Romana Street, Suite 800 P.O. Box 13010 Pensacola, FL 32591-3010

For Respondent AngelaJ. Jones Santa Rosa County's Attorney's Office 6495 Caroline Street Milton, FL 32570 Gregory T. Stewart Harry F. Chiles William Gamer Nobors, Giblin & Nickerson, P.A. 1500 MahanDrive, Suite 200 Tallahassee, Fl 32308 Copy to: FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket FAA Airport Compliance and Management Analysis, AC0-100 

# !/)(l I /

. 

# (_1 

# Yitufh/l?f;;t{ ClaudiaRoberts



### ~ Office ofAirport Compliance and

Management Analysis 

# •
FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS 

INFORMATION SHEET BY COURT REPORTERS 

You are expected to file the reporter’s record by the original due date. See Tex. R. App. P.35. If 

a reporter determines that the due date may not be met, please advise the Clerk of the Court of 

Appeals immediately in writing, stating the reason and the due date by which the record will be 

filed. Generally speaking, for good cause shown, the Court will grant no more than two 

extensions from the original record due date, each extension not to exceed 30 days in regular 

appeals and 10 days in accelerated appeals for a total period not to exceed 60 days in regular 

appeals and 20 days in accelerated appeals.

 

Appellate Case Number: Trial Court Case Number: 

(1) Is there a Reporter's Record? Y N

(2) Are you the only court reporter involved in this appeal? Y N

If not, please provide the names and addresses of all other court

reporters below.

(3) Has the appellant requested that the reporter’s record be prepared or 

has the trial court ordered that the record be prepared?

 Y N

(4) Please select from the following options:

 A. The appellant has paid for the record.

 B. The appellant has made arrangements to pay for the record

 C. The appellant is appealing as indigent.

 D. The appellant has not paid or made arrangements to pay for the

 record and is not appealing as indigent.

(5) Extension (fill out if extension is required for any reason other than payment)

I was unable to file the record in this appeal by ________. I expect the record 

in this appeal to be approximately _______ pages. The record covers 

_______days of testimony. I believe that I can file the record by _________. I 

ask that the court grant an extension until that time for filing the record.

Additional Comments: ___________________________________________

Court Reporter's Signature, Full Address, Email Address and Telephone Number: 

_______________________________________________________________________ 

_______________________________________________________________________

 FILED IN 14th COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 12/9/2015 11:08:20 AM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
#### § 13.1208 Lake Camp.

Leaving a boat, trailer, or vehicle unattended for more than 72 hours at the facilities associated with the Lake Camp launching ramp is prohibited without authorization from the Superintendent. Leaving a boat unattended at the Lake Camp dock is prohibited.
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED May 30, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-31237 Summary Calendar

KERRY GUIDRY; BRENDA GUIDRY; Plaintiffs-Appellants,
versus
APACHE CORPORATION OF DELAWARE; CHEVRON USA INC; Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

(2:05-CV-1405) Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Kerry Guidry’s shrimp trawler allided with a section of pipe while shrimping in the navigable waters of Grand Bayou Blue, a bayou which crossed an oil field leased by defendant Apache. The Guidries sued Apache and Chevron for the resulting damages, and the2

district court dismissed, granting both defendants’ motions for summary judgment. The Guidries appeal. To establish liability the Guidries must prove that the pipe
was owned, maintained, controlled, or placed in position by either Apache or Chevron. Creppel v. Shell Oil Co. , 738 F.2d 699 (5 th Cir. 1984). They have presented no summary judgment evidence linking the pipe to either defendant. Undisputed evidence shows that the pipe
was long-abandoned, submerged near an active public waterway. Moreover, it was cut at both ends and was not connected to any equipment owned by either Chevron or Apache. Faced with similar facts in Creppel , we explained that the plaintiff could not survive summary judgment without some evidence linking the defendant to the submerged pipe. It is not enough that the defendants’ operations were closest to the allision site. Id. The Guidries rely on Gele v. Chevron , 574 F.2d 243 (5 th Cir. 1978, where Chief Judge John Brown, writing for the panel, affirmed liability against Chevron in a similar maritime dispute. Yet the differences are crucial. In Gele the plaintiff’s vessel struck an active flare pipe, located in a area where Chevron was the exclusive operator. Chevron’s control of the pipe was obvious to the district court, a finding-of-fact further shielded from appellate inquisitiveness by the clear-error standard of review in that case. Here, on summary judgment, plaintiffs provided no3

evidence, except for speculation, linking the pipe to the defendants. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
× Home
      About Us
      Archives
      Events
      Publications
 Contact Us To provide feedback on the Community Policing Dispatch, e-mail the editorial board at CPDispatch@usdoj.gov. To obtain details on COPS Office programs, publications, and resources, contact the COPS Office Response Center at 800-421-6770 or AskCopsRC@usdoj.gov   **U.S. Department of Justice** 
        Office of Community Oriented Policing Services 145 N Street, N.E. 
      Washington, DC 20530 www.cops.usdoj.gov  ×
 
 Home
            About Us
            Archives
            Events
            Publications
            Contact Us
 **Add Your Voice to a New Initiative on Promising Practices** January 2021 | Volume 14 | Issue 1
  The COPS Office and the International Association of Chiefs of Police (IACP) are seeking law enforcement agencies to participate in a new initiative to identify promising practices in the field of law enforcement victim support. Victim-centered, trauma-informed approaches to crime can help support victim recovery and engagement with the criminal justice system. These approaches promote enhanced victim and community safety while helping law enforcement solve and prevent crime. Case studies of up to 16 agencies will be conducted to document promising practices and lessons learned around victim response. A diverse array of agencies will be selected, including those with and without agency-based victim services personnel. The case studies will address how victim-centered, trauma-informed practices are implemented and sustained as part of overall operating philosophy and culture with the goal to provide law enforcement agencies across the country with increased awareness of evidence-informed strategies for developing strong, sustainable victim services programs in their communities. If you are interested or want to learn more, please visit Promising Practices in Law Enforcement Victim Support. Tweet
 **Subscribe to Email Updates**
 To sign up for monthly updates or to access your subscriber preferences, please enter your email address in the Subscribe box.
 Email
 The Community Policing Dispatch is the e-newsletter of the COPS Office.   The Community Policing Dispatch is the e-newsletter of the COPS Office.
 **Explore** Home
            About Us
            Archives
            Events
            
            
            Publications
            Contact Us
 Connect With Us Want to stay connected with the COPS office? 
            Follow us on social media!
  FOIA
            No FEAR Act
            Open Government
            Plain Writing
            USA.gov
            Legal Policies and Disclaimers
            Language Access Plan
            DOJ Privacy Policy
# EUR-Lex - 12008E019 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008E019

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - PART TWO: NON-DISCRIMINATION AND CITIZENSHIP OF THE UNION - Article 19 (ex Article 13 TEC) **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0056 - 0056 *

Article 19

(ex Article 13 TEC)

1. Without prejudice to the other provisions of the Treaties and within the limits of the powers conferred by them upon the Union, the Council, acting unanimously in accordance with a special legislative procedure and after obtaining the consent of the European Parliament, may take appropriate action to combat discrimination based on sex, racial or ethnic origin, religion or belief, disability, age or sexual orientation.

2. By way of derogation from paragraph 1, the European Parliament and the Council, acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure, may adopt the basic principles of Union incentive measures, excluding any harmonisation of the laws and regulations of the Member States, to support action taken by the Member States in order to contribute to the achievement of the objectives referred to in paragraph 1.

--------------------------------------------------
Case 16-30262 Doc 1 Filed 09/22/16 Entered 09/22/16 15:51:06 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 9
Case 16-30262 Doc 1 Filed 09/22/16 Entered 09/22/16 15:51:06 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 9
Case 16-30262 Doc 1 Filed 09/22/16 Entered 09/22/16 15:51:06 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 9
Case 16-30262 Doc 1 Filed 09/22/16 Entered 09/22/16 15:51:06 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 9
Case 16-30262 Doc 1 Filed 09/22/16 Entered 09/22/16 15:51:06 Desc Main

 Document Page 5 of 9
Case 16-30262 Doc 1 Filed 09/22/16 Entered 09/22/16 15:51:06 Desc Main

 Document Page 6 of 9
Case 16-30262 Doc 1 Filed 09/22/16 Entered 09/22/16 15:51:06 Desc Main

 Document Page 7 of 9
Case 16-30262 Doc 1 Filed 09/22/16 Entered 09/22/16 15:51:06 Desc Main

 Document Page 8 of 9
Case 16-30262 Doc 1 Filed 09/22/16 Entered 09/22/16 15:51:06 Desc Main

 Document Page 9 of 9