alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

I, Melvin L. Williams, Chief Financial Officer of Searchlight
Minerals Corp. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company, for
      the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2006, and to which this certification is
      attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                         

| | By:    | /s/ Melvin L. Williams 
| | ------ | -----------------------
| |        |                        
| | Name:  | MELVIN L. WILLIAMS     
| |        |                        
| | Title: | Chief Financial Officer
| |        |                        
| | Date:  | August 10, 2006        

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-QSB to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-QSB), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
#### § 1270.24 When the Archivist may act for a President.

If a President specifies restrictions on access to Presidential records under 44 U.S.C. 2204(a), but has not made a designation under § 1270.22 at the time of their death or disability, the Archivist exercises the President's discretion or authority under 44 U.S.C. 2204, except as limited by 44 U.S.C. 2208 and § 1270.48.
Exhibit 10.4
​
IDEANOMICS, INC.
​
AMENDMENT NO. 9TO
CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTE
​
This AMENDMENT NO. 9 TO CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTE (the “Amendment”), effective as of June 5, 2020 (the “Effective Date”), is by and among IDEANOMICS, INC., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), and SHANE MCMAHON (the “Payee”).
​
WHEREAS, the Company and the Payee are parties to that certain Convertible Promissory Note of the Company, dated as of May 10, 2012, as amended as of May 18, 2012, as of October 19, 2012, as of May 10, 2013, as of January 31, 2014, as of December 30, 2014, as of December 31, 2016 and as of November 9, 2017 in principal amount of $3,000,000.00 (the “Note”); and
​
WHEREAS, the Company and the Payee desire to amend the Note as provided herein;
​
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:
​
	1.
	Effective as of the Effective Date, the first sentence of Section 3(b) of the Note shall be deleted in its entirety and, in lieu thereof, the following new first sentence of Section 3(b) is inserted:


​
The Principal Amount  of this Note and all accrued and unpaid interest may, at Payee’s option, be converted into shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.001 (the “Common Stock”), at a per share conversion price equal to $0.59 (the “Optional Conversion Price”) contingent upon the immediate conversion of the Note.
​
	2.
	Except as expressly amended by this Amendment, the terms and conditions of the Note are hereby confirmed and shall remain in full force and effect without impairment or modification.


​
	3.
	This Amendment shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York without giving effect to any choice of law or conflict of law provision or rule (whether of the State of New York or any other jurisdiction) that would cause the application of the laws of any jurisdiction other than the State of New York.


​
	4.
	This Amendment may be executed electronically via email or facsimile and in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.


​
[Remainder of Page Intentionally Left Blank]
​
​



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment effective as of the day and year first above written.
​
	​


	​


	​



	​
	IDEANOMICS, INC.

	​
	​

	​
	By: 
	/s/ Alf Poor

	​
	Name:
	Alf Poor

	​
	Title:
	Chief Executive Officer

	​
	​
	​

	​
	​
	​

	​
	​
	SHANE MCMAHON

	​
	​
	​

	​
	​
	/s/ Shane McMahon

	​
	​
	Shane McMahon



​
[Signature Page to Shane McMahon Promissory Note Amendment]
§ 1228.12 How do agencies obtain approval to loan permanent or unscheduled records? ( a ) An agency proposing to loan permanent or unscheduled records must prepare a written loan agreement with the proposed recipient. The agreement must include: ( 1 ) The name of the department or agency and subdivisions having custody of the records;
( 2 ) The name and address of the proposed recipient of the records;
( 3 ) A list containing: ( i ) Identification of the records to be loaned, by series or system;
( ii ) The inclusive dates for each series or system;
( iii ) The volume and media of the records to be loaned; and
( iv ) The NARA disposition job (SF 115) and item numbers covering the records, if any.
( 4 ) A statement of the purpose and duration of the loan;
( 5 ) A statement specifying any restrictions on the use of the records and how these restrictions will be imposed by the recipient;
( 6 ) A certification that the records will be stored in areas with security and environmental controls equal to those specified in part 1234 of this subchapter; and
( 7 ) A signature block for the Archivist of the United States. The loan must not take place until the Archivist has signed the agreement.
( b ) On request, NARA may allow an agency to prepare an annual loan agreement covering multiple transfers from the same series of records to another single Federal agency.
( c ) The agency must send a written request to NARA, by mail at National Archives and Records Administration; Office of the Chief Records Officer (AC); 8601 Adelphi Road; College Park, MD 20740-6001, or by email at *RM.Communications@nara.gov ,* transmitting the proposed loan agreement, citing the rationale for not providing copies in place of the original records, and specifying the name, title, and phone number of an agency contact. The request must be submitted or approved by the individual authorized to sign records schedules as described in § 1220.34(b) of this subchapter.
[74 FR 51014, Oct. 2, 2009, as amended at 83 FR 13654, Mar. 30, 2018]
#### James E. Rock et al., Respondents, *v.*The Acker Process Company, Appellant. Mary Clifford, Respondent, *v.*The Acker Process Company, Appellant. Annie F. Joyce et al., Respondents, *v.*The Acker Process Company, Appellant. John Koelle, Respondent, *v.*The Acker Process Company, Appellant. Katie Locher, Respondent, *v.*The Acker Process Company, Appellant. Andrew Wattengel, Respondent, *v.*The Acker Process Company, Appellant.

(Argued April 16, 1907;

decided April 30, 1907.)

*Rock v. Acker Process Co.,*113 App. Div. 695, affirmed.

Appeal in each of the above-entitled actions from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the *605fourth judicial department, entered May 8, 1906, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon the report of a referee in an action to restrain an alleged nuisance and to recover damages occasioned thereby.

*Mortimer Stiefel*for appellant.

*P. F. King*for respondents.

Judgments affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, CIi. J., G-bay, Edwabd T. Babtlett, Haight, Webneb, Willabd Babtlett and Hiscook, JJ.
§ 63.19 Special procedures for discontinuances of international services. ( a ) With the exception of those international carriers described in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, any international carrier that seeks to discontinue, reduce, or impair service, including the retiring of international facilities, dismantling or removing of international trunk lines, shall be subject to the following procedures in lieu of those specified in §§ 63.61 through 63.602: ( 1 ) The carrier shall notify all affected customers of the planned discontinuance, reduction or impairment at least 30 days prior to its planned action. Notice shall be in writing to each affected customer unless the Commission authorizes in advance, for good cause shown, another form of notice.
( 2 ) The carrier shall file with this Commission a copy of the notification on the date on which notice has been given to all affected customers. The filing may be made by letter (sending an original and five copies to the Office of the Secretary, and a copy to the Chief, Office of International Affairs) and shall identify the geographic areas of the planned discontinuance, reduction or impairment and the authorization(s) pursuant to which the carrier provides service.
( b ) The following procedures shall apply to any international carrier that the Commission has classified as dominant in the provision of a particular international service because the carrier possesses market power in the provision of that service on the U.S. end of the route. Any such carrier that seeks to retire international facilities, dismantle or remove international trunk lines, but does not discontinue, reduce or impair the dominant services being provided through these facilities, shall only be subject to the notification requirements of paragraph (a) of this section. If such carrier discontinues, reduces or impairs the dominant service, or retires facilities that impair or reduce the service, the carrier shall file an application pursuant to §§ 63.62 and 63.500.
( c ) Commercial Mobile Radio Service (CMRS) carriers, as defined in § 20.9 of this chapter, are not subject to the provisions of this section.
( d ) Subject to the availability of electronic forms, all filings described in this section must be filed electronically through the International Communications Filing System (ICFS). A list of forms that are available for electronic filing can be found on the ICFS homepage. For information on electronic filing requirements, see §§ 1.1000 through 1.10018 of this chapter and the ICFS homepage at *https://www.fcc.gov/icfs*. See also §§ 63.20 and 63.53.
[67 FR 45391, July 9, 2002, as amended at 70 FR 38798, July 6, 2005; 72 FR 54366, Sept. 25, 2007; 81 FR 62656, Sept. 12, 2016; 88 FR 21443, Apr. 10, 2023]
§ 13.118 Cabin site compatibility. The Superintendent shall establish permit conditions that require a permittee— ( a ) When constructing, maintaining or repairing a cabin or other structure authorized under this subpart, to use materials and methods that blend with and are compatible with the immediate and surrounding landscape; and
( b ) When terminating an activity that involves a structure authorized under this subpart, to dismantle and remove the structure and all personal property from the park area within a reasonable period of time and in a manner consistent with the protection of the park area.
§ 1010.5 Major decision points. ( a ) The possible environmental effects of a proposed action or project within the Presidio Trust Area must be considered along with technical, financial, and other factors throughout the decision-making process. Most Trust projects have three distinct stages in the decision-making process: ( 1 ) Conceptual or preliminary study stage;
( 2 ) Detailed planning or final decision stage;
( 3 ) Implementation stage.
( b ) Environmental review will be integrated into the decision-making process of the Trust as follows: ( 1 ) During the conceptual or preliminary study stage, the NEPA Compliance Coordinator shall determine whether the proposed action or project is one which is categorically excluded under § 1010.7, has been adequately reviewed in a previously prepared EA and/or EIS, or requires further NEPA review (*i.e.,* an EA or an EIS).
( 2 ) If the proposed action or project is not categorically excluded and has not been adequately reviewed in a previously prepared EA and/or EIS, then prior to the Trust's proceeding beyond the conceptual or preliminary study stage, the NEPA Compliance Coordinator must determine whether an EIS is required. When appropriate, prior to the determination as to whether an EIS is required, the NEPA Compliance Coordinator may initiate a public scoping process in order to inform such a determination.
( 3 ) If an EIS is determined to be necessary, the Trust shall initiate a public scoping process in accordance with 40 CFR 1501.7. An EIS, if determined necessary, must be completed and circulated at the earliest point at which meaningful analysis can be developed for the proposed action or project and prior to the Trust's final approval of the proposed action or project.
# EUR-Lex - 12004V345 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V345

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART III — THE POLICIES AND FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - TITLE VI — THE FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - CHAPTER I — PROVISIONS GOVERNING THE INSTITUTIONS - Section 1 — The institutions - Subsection 3 — The Council of Ministers - Article III-345 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0154 - 0154 *

Article III-345

The Council, by a simple majority, may request the Commission to undertake any studies the Council considers desirable for the attainment of the common objectives, and to submit any appropriate proposals to it. If the Commission does not submit a proposal, it shall inform the Council of the reasons.

--------------------------------------------------
# EUR-Lex - 12008M/PRO/12 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008M/PRO/12

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on European Union - PROTOCOLS - Protocol (No 12) on the excessive deficit procedure **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0279 - 0280 *

PROTOCOL (No 12)

ON THE EXCESSIVE DEFICIT PROCEDURE

THE HIGH CONTRACTING PARTIES,

DESIRING TO lay down the details of the excessive deficit procedure referred to in Article 126 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

HAVE AGREED upon the following provisions, which shall be annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union:

Article 1

The reference values referred to in Article 126(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union are:

- 3 % for the ratio of the planned or actual government deficit to gross domestic product at market prices;

- 60 % for the ratio of government debt to gross domestic product at market prices.

Article 2

In Article 126 of the said Treaty and in this Protocol:

- "government" means general government, that is central government, regional or local government and social security funds, to the exclusion of commercial operations, as defined in the European System of Integrated Economic Accounts;

- "deficit" means net borrowing as defined in the European System of Integrated Economic Accounts;

- "investment" means gross fixed capital formation as defined in the European System of Integrated Economic Accounts;

- "debt" means total gross debt at nominal value outstanding at the end of the year and consolidated between and within the sectors of general government as defined in the first indent.

Article 3

In order to ensure the effectiveness of the excessive deficit procedure, the governments of the Member States shall be responsible under this procedure for the deficits of general government as defined in the first indent of Article 2. The Member States shall ensure that national procedures in the budgetary area enable them to meet their obligations in this area deriving from these Treaties. The Member States shall report their planned and actual deficits and the levels of their debt promptly and regularly to the Commission.

Article 4

The statistical data to be used for the application of this Protocol shall be provided by the Commission.

--------------------------------------------------
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Policy & Pro... 
-  Crop Loss Adjustment Standards 

## Policy & Procedure

        -  Bulletins and Memos            -  Actuarial Releases 
          -  Informational Memorandums 
          -  Manager's Bulletins 
          -  Product Management Bulletins 
        -  Final Agency Determinations            -  Request a Final Agency Determination 
        -  General Policies            -  Commodity Exchange Price Provisions 
          -  Livestock Insurance Plans 
          -  Margin Protection 
          -  Rainfall Index 
          -  Whole-Farm Revenue Protection 
        -  Crop Policies 
        -  Reinsurance Agreements            -  Livestock Price Reinsurance Agreement Archive 
          -  Standard Reinsurance Agreement Archive 
        -  Appendix III/M-13 Handbook Index 
        -  Crop Underwriting Standards 
        -  Crop Loss Adjustment Standards 
        -  General Handbooks 

# Crop Loss Adjustment Standards

Search for Crop Loss Adjustment Standards.

To reference handbooks in years prior to 2015 please view the legacy archive website.

-  1 
-  2 
-  3 
-  4 
-  5 
-   ...  
-    38  
-   Next
1... See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.4.

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 2-08-240-CR

LETICIA ANDERSON APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

------------

FROM THE 371ST DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

------------

On July 6, 2005, Appellant Leticia Anderson pleaded guilty to possession

with intent to deliver a controlled substance of between four and two hundred

grams. Pursuant to a plea bargain agreement, the trial court placed Anderson

on seven years’ deferred adjudication community supervision. The trial court’s

certification of Anderson’s right to appeal states that this “is a plea-bargained
2

case[,] and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” See TEX. R. APP. P.

25.2(a)(2). 

Anderson filed a pro se notice of appeal on July 3, 2008. On July 22,

2008, we notified Anderson that the certification indicating she has no right to

appeal had been filed in this court and that we would dismiss this appeal unless

Anderson or any party desiring to continue the appeal filed a response showing

grounds for continuing the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d), 44.3. We have

received no response to our notification.

Rule 25.2(a)(2) limits the right to appeal in a plea bargain case to those

matters that were raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial and

to those cases where the appellant obtained the trial court’s permission to

appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2)(A), (B). According to the trial court’s

certification—which states that Anderson has no right to appeal—neither of

these circumstances applies.

Because Anderson has no right to appeal, we dismiss this appeal. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: HOLMAN, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b)
3

DELIVERED: August 26, 2008
BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

) 

) 

Mike Braun for Indiana and Thomas Datwyler ) MUR 8107 

 in his official capacity as treasurer ) 

) 

SECOND CONSENT TO EXTEND THE TIME TO COMMENCE A

CIVIL LAW ENFORCEMENT ACTION, SUIT OR PROCEEDING

In order to provide for a possible resolution of this matter through pre-probable cause 

conciliation, Respondent, Mike Braun for Indiana and Thomas Datwyler in his official capacity 

as treasurer, hereby consents to toll the statute of limitations for any civil enforcement action,

suit, or proceeding that the Federal Election Commission might institute in connection with

MUR 8107 pursuant to 52 U.S.C. § 30109(a) for an additional period of ninety (90) days. 

This agreement will extend the time to institute a civil law enforcement suit for an

additional period of ninety (90) calendar days from the expiration date of the five-year statute of 

limitations found at 28 U.S.C. § 2462, or any other statute of limitations or repose that may be 

applicable in these matters.

There shall be no additional consent to extend the time to instate a civil law enforcement

suit without the written consent of the Respondent. 

Dated: _September 11, 2023

__________________________

Counsel for Respondent 

MUR810700098
# Leif Erikson Day, 2006

Leif Erikson Day honors a great son of Iceland and grandson of Norway who became one of the first Europeans known to reach North America. This day is also an opportunity to celebrate the generations of Nordic Americans who have contributed to our country and strengthened the ties that forever bind the United States with Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden.

Like the crew of risk takers that Leif Erikson boldly led on a quest to find new lands, Americans have always valued the ideals of exploration and discovery. A desire to seek and understand inspired their voyage more than a millennium ago, and it remains a central part of our national character as a new generation pursues great new goals today. Nordic Americans continue to make valuable contributions to our society that have expanded human knowledge and helped make our world a better place.

To honor Leif Erikson and to celebrate our citizens of Nordic-American heritage, the Congress, by joint resolution (Public Law 88-566) approved on September 2, 1964, has authorized the President to proclaim October 9 of each year as “Leif Erikson Day.”

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, do hereby proclaim October 9, 2006, as Leif Erikson Day. I call upon all Americans to observe this day with appropriate ceremonies, activities, and programs to honor our rich Nordic-American heritage.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this fourth day of October, in the year of our Lord two thousand six, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-first.

[FR Doc. 06-8610

Billing code 3195-01-P