alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
PUBLIC HEARING ON THENOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING FORTHE DISHWASHERTEST PROCEDURE TUESDAY, OCTOBER 22, 2002 9:00 a.m. - 4:00 p.m. The Department ofEnergy (DOE) is convening a public hearing to discuss and receive comments onthe dishwashertest procedure presented inthe Notice ofProposed Rulemakingpublished in the Federal Register on September 3,2002. The hearing will be held on Tuesday, October 22,2002, from 9:00 a.m. until 4:00 p.m. in Room lE-245 ofthe Forrestal Building, U.S. Department ofEnergy, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20585. Please note that foreign nationals visiting DOE headquarters are subject to advance security screeningprocedures. Foreign nationals that wish to participate in the hearing are asked to contact Ms. Crystal Branson at (202) 586-6448 so that the necessary arrangements canbe made. A copy ofthe preliminary agenda is attached. Additional informationpertinent to the rulemaking is available at our website: http://www.eren.doe.gov/buildings/codesstandards/index.htm Ifyou plan to attend the hearing, please let Ms. Branson know by telephone at (202) 586-6448, by fax at (202) 586-4617, or bye-mail at Crystal.Branson@ee.doe.gov. Ifyou would like to make a presentation at the hearing, we would appreciate your letting us know by October 8, and ask that you send us a copy ofyour remarks as soon as possible. Additional written comments, data, and informationpertinent to the rulemaking must be submitted to DOE no laterthanNovember 18,2002. Because ofsignificant delays in conventional mail service here at the Department, we request that you submit comments by electronic mail to the following address, specifically established for this rulemaking: Dishwashertp@,ee.doe.gov. Comments in electronic format should make reference to the docket number EE-RM/TP-99-500, and whereverpossible carrythe electronic signature ofthe author. Absent an electronic signature, comments submitted electronicallymust be followed and authenticated by submitting the signed original paper document. Electronic comments must be submitted as a WordPerfect 5.1, 6.1, or 8 format file and avoid use ofspecial characters or any form ofencryption. Telefaxes will notbe accepted. Again, thank you for your interest inthis dishwasher testprocedure rulemaking. We look forward to seeing you at the hearing. Sincerely,

# ~0 Barbara Twigg Program Manager for Dishwashers
§ 80.52 May an activity be eligible for funding if it is not explicitly eligible in this part? An activity may be eligible for funding even if this part does not explicitly designate it as an eligible activity if: ( a ) The State fish and wildlife agency justifies in the project statement how the activity will help carry out the purposes of the Pittman-Robertson Wildlife Restoration Act or the Dingell-Johnson Sport Fish Restoration Act; and
( b ) The Regional Director concurs with the justification.
# EUR-Lex - 12008E000 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008E000

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - PREAMBLE **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0049 - 0049 *

PREAMBLE

HIS MAJESTY THE KING OF THE BELGIANS, THE PRESIDENT OF THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY, THE PRESIDENT OF THE FRENCH REPUBLIC, THE PRESIDENT OF THE ITALIAN REPUBLIC, HER ROYAL HIGHNESS THE GRAND DUCHESS OF LUXEMBOURG, HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN OF THE NETHERLANDS, [1]

DETERMINED to lay the foundations of an ever closer union among the peoples of Europe,

RESOLVED to ensure the economic and social progress of their States by common action to eliminate the barriers which divide Europe,

AFFIRMING as the essential objective of their efforts the constant improvements of the living and working conditions of their peoples,

RECOGNISING that the removal of existing obstacles calls for concerted action in order to guarantee steady expansion, balanced trade and fair competition,

ANXIOUS to strengthen the unity of their economies and to ensure their harmonious development by reducing the differences existing between the various regions and the backwardness of the less favoured regions,

DESIRING to contribute, by means of a common commercial policy, to the progressive abolition of restrictions on international trade,

INTENDING to confirm the solidarity which binds Europe and the overseas countries and desiring to ensure the development of their prosperity, in accordance with the principles of the Charter of the United Nations,

RESOLVED by thus pooling their resources to preserve and strengthen peace and liberty, and calling upon the other peoples of Europe who share their ideal to join in their efforts,

DETERMINED to promote the development of the highest possible level of knowledge for their peoples through a wide access to education and through its continuous updating,

and to this end HAVE DESIGNATED as their Plenipotentiaries:

(List of plenipotentiaries not reproduced)

WHO, having exchanged their full powers, found in good and due form, have agreed as follows.

[1] The Republic of Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, the Kingdom of Denmark, the Republic of Estonia, Ireland, the Hellenic Republic, the Kingdom of Spain, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Austria, the Republic of Poland, the Portuguese Republic, Romania, the Republic of Slovenia, the Slovak Republic, the Republic of Finland, the Kingdom of Sweden and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland have since become members of the European Union.

--------------------------------------------------
§ 13.495 Application procedures for subsistence permits and aircraft exceptions. ( a ) Any person applying for the subsistence permit required by § 13.440(a), or the exception to the prohibition on aircraft use provided by § 13.450(b)(2), shall submit his/her application to the Superintendent of the appropriate national park or monument. If the applicant is unable or does not wish to submit the application in written form, the Superintendent shall provide the applicant an opportunity to present the application orally and shall keep a record of such oral application. Each application must include a statement which acknowledges that providing false information in support of the application is a violation of Section 1001 of Title 18 of the United States Code, and additional statements or documentation which demonstrates that the applicant satisfies the criteria set forth in § 13.440(a) for a subsistence permit or § 13.450(b)(2) for the aircraft exception, as appropriate. Except in extraordinary cases for good cause shown, the Superintendent shall decide whether to grant or deny the application in a timely manner not to exceed forty-five (45) days following the receipt of the completed application. Should the Superintendent deny the application, he/she shall include in the decision a statement of the reasons for the denial and shall promptly forward a copy to the applicant.
( b ) An applicant whose application has been denied by the Superintendent has the right to have his/her application reconsidered by the Alaska Regional Director by contacting the Regional Director within 180 days of the issuance of the denial. The Regional Director may extend the 180-day time limit to initiate a reconsideration for good cause shown by the applicant. For purposes of reconsideration, the applicant shall present the following information: ( 1 ) Any statement or documentation, in addition to that included in the initial application, which demonstrates that the applicant satisfies the criteria set forth in paragraph (a) of this section;
( 2 ) The basis for the applicant's disagreement with the Superintendent's findings and conclusions; and
( 3 ) Whether or not the applicant requests an informal hearing before the Regional Director.
( c ) The Regional Director shall provide a hearing if requested by the applicant. After consideration of the written materials and oral hearing, if any, and within a reasonable period of time, the Regional Director shall affirm, reverse, or modify the denial of the Superintendent and shall set forth in writing the basis for the decision. A copy of the decision shall be forwarded promptly to the applicant and shall constitute final agency action.
#### Allen v. The St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Company, *Appellant.*

Conversion: evidence. In an action against a corporation for the conversion of Certain staves, defendant offered evidence that they were cut from land owned by the president of the corporation, in connection with evidence that the president had directed the taking of them. There was no evidence that he had not granted permission to plaintiffs to cut the staves, and no other evidence that they belonged to him. Held, that the offer was properly rejected.

*Appeal, from Stoddard Circuit Court.*— Hon. R. P. Owen, Judge.

Affirmed.

*W. R. Donaldson*and *Thoroughman & Warren*for appellant.

Napton, J.

This was a suit against the'defendant before a justice of the peace for taking some staves belonging to plaintiffs, of the value of $50, and a judgment was rendered before the justice, and subsequently in the circuit court for $50. The only point made for the reversal of the judgment is the exclusion of evidence offered to prove that the staves in question were cut upon defendant’s land. This, .however, is a mistake. No such offer was made. Proof was offered that the land on which the staves were *387cut belonged to Thos. Allen, and that Thos. Allen was president of the corporation defendant. Thos. Allen was not the defendant, and hence the case of *Pearson v. Inlow,*20 Mo. 322, is not applicable. The owner of the land, where the staves were cut, whether T,hos. Allen or another, may have granted permission to plaintiffs to cut the staves, and Thos. Allen, after the staves were made and piled up near the railroad, had no right to order the defendant’s agent to take the staves, as there was no evidence whatever that they belonged to him. Judgment affirmed.
§ 1192.113 Doorways. ( a ) *Clear width.* ( 1 ) At least one doorway, on each side of the car from which passengers board, of each car required to be accessible by § 1192.111(a) and where the spaces required by § 1192.111(d) are located, and at least one adjacent doorway into coach passenger compartments shall have a minimum clear opening width of 32 inches.
( 2 ) Doorways at ends of cars connecting two adjacent cars, to the maximum extent practicable in accordance with regulations issued under the Federal Railroad Safety Act of 1970 (49 CFR parts 229 and 231), shall have a clear opening width of 32 inches to permit wheelchair and mobility aid users to enter into a single-level dining car, if available.
( b ) *Passaway.* Doorways required to be accessible by paragraph (a) of this section shall permit access by persons using mobility aids and shall have an unobstructed passageway at least 32 inches wide leading to an accessible sleeping compartment complying with § 1192.127 or seating locations complying with § 1192.125(d). In cars where such doorways require passage through a vestibule, such vestibule shall have a minimum width of 42 inches. (see Fig. 4)
( c ) *Signals.* If doors to the platform close automatically or from a remote location, auditory and visual warning signals shall be provided to alert passengers of closing doors.
( d ) *Coordination with boarding platforms* — ( 1 ) *Requirements.* Cars which provide level-boarding in stations with high platforms shall be coordinated with the boarding platform or mini-high platform design such that the horizontal gap between a car at rest and the platform shall be no greater than 3 inches and the height of the car floor shall be within plus or minus 5 ⁄ 8 inch of the platform height. Vertical alignment may be accomplished by car air suspension, platform lifts or other devices, or any combination.
( 2 ) *Exception.* New cars operating in existing stations may have a floor height within plus or minus 11 ⁄ 2 inches of the platform height.
( 3 ) *Exception.* Where platform set-backs do not allow the horizontal gap or vertical alignment specified in paragraph (d) (1) or (2) of this section, platform or portable lifts complying with § 1192.125(b), or car or platform bridge plates, complying with § 1192.125(c), may be provided.
( 4 ) *Exception.* Retrofitted vehicles shall be coordinated with the platform in existing stations such that the horizontal gap shall be no greater than 4 inches and the height of the vehicle floor, under 50% passenger load, shall be within plus or minus 2 inches of the platform height.
( e ) *Signage.* The International Symbol of Accessibility shall be displayed on the exterior of all doors complying with this section unless all cars and doors are accessible and are not marked by the access symbol (see Fig. 6). Appropriate signage shall also indicate which accessible doors are adjacent to an accessible restroom, if applicable.
# EUR-Lex - 12008E020 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008E020

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - PART TWO: NON-DISCRIMINATION AND CITIZENSHIP OF THE UNION - Article 20 (ex Article 17 TEC) **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0056 - 0056 *

Article 20

(ex Article 17 TEC)

1. Citizenship of the Union is hereby established. Every person holding the nationality of a Member State shall be a citizen of the Union. Citizenship of the Union shall be additional to and not replace national citizenship.

2. Citizens of the Union shall enjoy the rights and be subject to the duties provided for in the Treaties. They shall have, inter alia:

(a) the right to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States;

(b) the right to vote and to stand as candidates in elections to the European Parliament and in municipal elections in their Member State of residence, under the same conditions as nationals of that State;

(c) the right to enjoy, in the territory of a third country in which the Member State of which they are nationals is not represented, the protection of the diplomatic and consular authorities of any Member State on the same conditions as the nationals of that State;

(d) the right to petition the European Parliament, to apply to the European Ombudsman, and to address the institutions and advisory bodies of the Union in any of the Treaty languages and to obtain a reply in the same language.

These rights shall be exercised in accordance with the conditions and limits defined by the Treaties and by the measures adopted thereunder.

--------------------------------------------------
#### HENRY M. PECK, Trustee, &c., Plaintiff and Respondent, *v.*THE NEW JERSEY & NEW YORK RAILWAY COMPANY, Defendant. ISAAC C. DEMAREST, Trustee, &c., Plaintiff and Respondent, *v.*THE NEW JERSEY & NEW YORK RAILWAY COMPANY, Defendant. In the Matter of the Petition of JEFFERSON M. LEVY, Appellant.

*Foreclosure of railroad mortgage*— when, *a sale, had under a decree in, will not he set aside.*

Appeal from an order made at Special Term, denying a motion made by Jefferson M. Levy, to set aside a judgment of foreclosure ■and a sale had thereunder.

The plaintiffs in these actions are trustees for the holders of eer-tain mortgage bonds issued by the defendant, and a company to whose rights and obligations it has succeeded. These actions were ■brought to foreclose the mortgages made to secure the bonds, and proceeded to a sale. Mr. Levy,' a holder of several of these bonds, moved at Special Term to set aside the sale, and presented "three grounds to the consideration of the court: 1st. Error of law by the referee to compute, whereby an excessive amount was reported due. 2d. Inadequacy of price. 3d. Surprise or mistake, ■preventing his presence at the sale.

The court, at General Term, said: “ A number of the bonds were pledged as collateral to debts of the company, by it, before their regular issue. These were included in the referee’s computation. 'The appellant contends that these never had a legal inception. The respondent’s answer is, 'that the company having failed to pay, the pledgees have sold, and the liability of the company become fixed. That this is true of some is shown by the appellant’s petition, showing title to a part of his bonds thus gained. Such an eventual ■disposition of all bonds pledged was natural, and properly provided for.

*130“ The appellant had an order staying the sale. This was vacated' on the day of the sale, and he pleads that, relying on this order, he-made no preparations to attend the sale, and, learning the stay had' been vacated too late, he was not present. The order vacating was-an adjudication that the stay should not have been granted in the first instance. This court will not interfere to throw the loss on, the party improperly restrained, and give the appellant advantage of his wrong. *(.La Forge*v. *Von*Wagenen, 11 How. Pr., 51.)

“We do not think inadequacy of consideration established, but, if it were, the disposition we have made of the other points would leave it standing alone, and would require such inadequacy as would shock the conscience, and amount in itself to conclusive and decisive-evidence of fraud.’ (Story Eq. Juris., § 216.)”

*Gla/rkson N.*Potter, for the appellant.

*G. B. Alexander*and *F. A. Brewster,*for the respondent.

Opinion by

Dtkman, J.;

Gilbert, J., concurred; Barnard, P, J., not sitting.

Order affirmed, with costs and disbursements.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
the financial statements of RBF Finance Co.  for  the  period  from
inception (March 19, 1999) to June 30, 1999 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-19-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           1,212
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   22,491
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                23,703
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 823,703
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           23,648
<BONDS>                                        800,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                          55
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   823,703
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                23,702
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              23,618
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     84
<INCOME-TAX>                                        30
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 54
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        54
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 195 (Tuesday, October 10, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 59463-59468]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-8550]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Transmittal No. 06-66]


36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text 
of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to 
fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 
July 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. J. Hurd, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 604-
6575.
    The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives, Transmittal 06-66 with attached transmittal, policy 
justification, and Sensitivity of Technology.

    Dated: October 3, 2006.
C.R. Choate,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M

[[Page 59464]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN10OC06.014


[[Page 59465]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN10OC06.015


[[Page 59466]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN10OC06.016


[[Page 59467]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN10OC06.017


[[Page 59468]]


[FR Doc. 06-8550 Filed 10-6-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
###### Editorial Note on Part 622

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 622 appear at 79 FR 57837, Sept. 26, 2014 and at 81 FR 32253, May 23, 2016.

#### §§ 622.173-622.175 [Reserved]
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000866878
<NAME>                        ICON Cash Flow Partners, L.P., Series C

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         1,983,281
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,114,592
<ALLOWANCES>                                      51,974
<INVENTORY>                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS> *                                     0
<PP&E>                                                 0
<DEPRECIATION>                                         0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3,079,477
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES> **                               0
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                               0
<OTHER-SE>                                     2,833,010
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3,079,477
<SALES>                                          637,323
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 756,341
<CGS>                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 132,646
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                (150,000)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        0
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    0
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                     773,695
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       3.87
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       3.87
<FN>
*    The  Partnership  has  an  unclassified  balance  sheet  in  its  financial
     statements due to the nature of its industry.  A value of "0" was used for
     current assets and liabilities.

**   The  Partnership  has  an  unclassified  balance  sheet  in  its  financial
     statements due to the nature of its industry.  A value of "0" was used for
     current assets and liabilities.
</FN>

        


</TABLE>