alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EUR-Lex - 12005SAN03/03 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12005SAN03/03

**Act concerning the conditions of accession of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania and the adjustments to the Treaties on which the European Union is founded - Annex III:List referred to in Article 19 of the Act of Accession: adaptations to acts adopted by the institutions - 3.Transport policy **

*
Official Journal L 157 , 21/06/2005 P. 0261 - 0261 *

3. TRANSPORT POLICY

31996 L 0026: Council Directive 96/26/EC of 29 April 1996 on admission to the occupation of road haulage operator and road passenger transport operator and mutual recognition of diplomas, certificates and other evidence of formal qualifications intended to facilitate for these operators the right to freedom of establishment in national and international transport operations (OJ L 124, 23.5.1996, p. 1), as amended by:

- 31998 L 0076: Council Directive 98/76/EC of 1.10.1998 (OJ L 277, 14.10.1998, p. 17),

- 12003 T: Act concerning the conditions of accession and the adjustments to the Treaties — Accession of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia and the Slovak Republic (OJ L 236, 23.9.2003, p. 33),

- 32004 L 0066: Council Directive 2004/66/EC of 26.4.2004 (OJ L 168, 1.5.2004, p. 35).

(a) The following paragraphs are added to Article 10:

"11. By way of derogation from paragraph 3, certificates issued to road transport operators before the date of accession in Bulgaria shall only be deemed equivalent to the certificates issued pursuant to the provisions of this Directive if they have been issued to:

- international road haulage and passenger transport operators under Ordinance No 11 of 31 October 2002 on International Carriage of Passengers and Goods by Road (State Gazette No 108 of 19 November 2002), since 19 November 2002;

- domestic road haulage and passenger transport operators under Ordinance 33 of 3 November 1999 on Public Carriage of Passengers and Goods on the territory of Bulgaria, as amended on 30 October 2002 (State Gazette No 108 of 19 November 2002), since 19 November 2002.

12. By way of derogation from paragraph 3, certificates issued to road transport operators before the date of accession in Romania shall only be deemed equivalent to the certificates issued pursuant to the provisions of this Directive if they have been issued to international and domestic road haulage and road passenger transport operators under Order of Minister of Transport No 761 of 21 December 1999 on appointing, training and professional certification of persons coordinating permanently and effectively road transport activity, since 28 January 2000."

(b) In Article 10b, the second paragraph is replaced by the following:

"The professional competence certificates referred to in paragraphs 4 to 12 of Article 10 may be reissued by the Member States concerned in the form of the certificate set out in Annex Ia.".

--------------------------------------------------
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY

Water Utility

11000 N. La Canada Drive

Oro Valley, Arizona 85737

(520) 229-5000 Fax (520) 229-5029

The Honorable Laura Yoshii

Acting Regional Administrator

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region IX

75 Hawthorne Street

San Francisco, California 94105

RECE'VED

DEC 2 1 2009

Permits Office Air·3

U.S. EPA. Region 9

Re: EPA Docket No. EPA-R09-0AR-2009-0598 (74 Fed. Reg. 44,313 (Aug. 28,

2009)

Dear Administrator Yoshii:

We understand that the Central Arizona Water Conservation District (CAWCD) intends

to fIle comments in the above-referenced docket on EPA's Advance Notice of Proposed

Rulemaking (ANPR) on Assessment of Anticipated Visibility Improvements at

Surrounding Class I Areas and Cost Effectiveness of Best Available RetrofIt Technology

(BART) for Four Comers Power Plant and Navajo Generating Station (NGS), published

on August 28, 2009, at 74 Fed. Reg. 44,313. CAWCD relies almost solely on the

electricity generated by NGS for pumping of water through the federally authorized

Central Arizona Project (CAP). The CAP provides a vitally needed, renewable water

supply to central and southern Arizona, including Oro Valley Water Utility. EPA's

BART determination for NGS is ofthe greatest importance to CAWCD and to the water

users that it serves. We understand that CAWCD has requested that EPA extend the

comment deadline on the ANPR by 60 days, to and including November 27, 2009 (or,

because that day is the day after Thanksgiving, to the following Monday, November 30,

2009).

We urge you to grant CAWCD's request. Oro Valley Water Utility is only one of the

many entities that rely on CAWCD and the Central Arizona Project to meet their annual

water needs. The ANPR has signifIcant ramifIcations for all CAP water users and raises a

wide range of issues that are highly complex from a technical, legal, and public policy

standpoint and that requires substantial resources and time to evaluate and address in

comments. A 30-day period for preparing meaningful comments on these issues is

inadequate and additional time should be allowed for comments.

Thank you for your consideration ofthis request.

Sincerely, /;) !J

~~t~~ Director

C: Jerene Watson
#### § 1230.1 What are the authorities for part 1230?

The statutory authorities for this part are 44 U.S.C. 3105 and 3106.
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 19 (Monday, January 30, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 4918]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-833]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


American Health Information Community Consumer Empowerment 
Workgroup Meeting

ACTION: Announcement of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the first meeting of the American Health 
Information Community Consumer Empowerment Workgroup in accordance with 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.).

DATES: January 30, 2006 from 1 p.m. to 5 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Hubert H. Humphrey Building (200 Independence Ave., SW., 
Washington, DC 20201), conference room 705A.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: http://www.hhs.gov/healthit.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For information on how to access this 
workgroup meeting via the Web, including ensuring your PC's 
compatibility, go to: http://www.hsrnet.net/onc/workgroups/.
    This notice is published less than 15 days in advance of the 
meeting due to logistical difficulties.

    Dated: January 23, 2006.
Dana Haza,
Office of Programs and Coordination, Office of the National 
Coordinator.
[FR Doc. 06-833 Filed 1-27-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150-24-M
# EUR-Lex - 12008M055 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008M055

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on European Union - TITLE VI: FINAL PROVISIONS - Article 55 (ex Article 53 TEU) **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0045 - 0045 *

Article 55

(ex Article 53 TEU)

1. This Treaty, drawn up in a single original in the Bulgarian, Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, Estonian, Finnish, French, German, Greek, Hungarian, Irish, Italian, Latvian, Lithuanian, Maltese, Polish, Portuguese, Romanian, Slovak, Slovenian, Spanish and Swedish languages, the texts in each of these languages being equally authentic, shall be deposited in the archives of the Government of the Italian Republic, which will transmit a certified copy to each of the governments of the other signatory States.

2. This Treaty may also be translated into any other languages as determined by Member States among those which, in accordance with their constitutional order, enjoy official status in all or part of their territory. A certified copy of such translations shall be provided by the Member States concerned to be deposited in the archives of the Council.

--------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 32


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

       In connection with the Annual Report of Food Technology Service, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2010 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Richard G.
Hunter, Chief Executive and Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

       (1)       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13
(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

       (2)       The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company at the end of, and for, this period covered by the Report.


March 28, 2011

                                          By:  /s/ Richard G. Hunter
                                              -------------------------
                                               Richard G. Hunter, Ph.D.,
                                               Chief Executive Officer and
                                               Chief Financial Officer
# EUR-Lex - 12008E/PRO/26 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008E/PRO/26

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - PROTOCOLS - Protocol (No 26) on services of general interest **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0308 - 0308 *

PROTOCOL (No 26)

ON SERVICES OF GENERAL INTEREST

THE HIGH CONTRACTING PARTIES,

WISHING to emphasise the importance of services of general interest,

HAVE AGREED UPON the following interpretative provisions, which shall be annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union:

Article 1

The shared values of the Union in respect of services of general economic interest within the meaning of Article 14 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union include in particular:

- the essential role and the wide discretion of national, regional and local authorities in providing, commissioning and organising services of general economic interest as closely as possible to the needs of the users;

- the diversity between various services of general economic interest and the differences in the needs and preferences of users that may result from different geographical, social or cultural situations;

- a high level of quality, safety and affordability, equal treatment and the promotion of universal access and of user rights.

Article 2

The provisions of the Treaties do not affect in any way the competence of Member States to provide, commission and organise non-economic services of general interest.

--------------------------------------------------
### The Honorable D. Brook Bartlett, Chief Judge, United States 1 

### District Court for the Western District of Missouri.



# United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 96-2525

___________ Bahiya Hiba Shakur, * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the v. * Western District of Missouri. * United States of America, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: April 15, 1997 Filed: April 17, 1997

___________ Before BOWMAN, WOLLMAN, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Bahiya Hiba Shakur appeal s from the denial by the District Court of 1 her motion seeking the return of forfeited property pursuant to Federa l Rule of Criminal Procedure 41(e). Having carefully reviewed the record an d Shakur’s arguments on appeal, we conclude that the District Court correctl y denied re lief. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R . 47B. We also deny Shakur’s motion for appointme nt of counsel and for oral argument.

### -2- A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT
1. Salt Lake City Corporation filed a motion to intervene indicating

that it is a party to the underlying proceeding and has an interest

in the outcome of the proceedings. This motion is granted. 2013 UT App 62

_________________________________________________________



### T HE 

### U TAH 

### C OURT OF 

### A PPEALS

G REG H OLLENBACH

,

Petitioner,

v.

S ALT L AKE C ITY C IVIL S ERVICE C OMMISSION AND

S ALT L AKE C ITY C ORPORATION

,

Respondent.

Per Curiam Decision

No. 20121073

‐ CA

Filed March 7, 2013

Original Proceeding In This Court

Marcus M. Mumford and Bret W. Rawson, Attorneys for Petitioner

Martha S. Stonebrook and J. Elizabeth Haws, Attorneys for Respondent Salt Lake City Corporation

Before J UDGES O RME

, T HORNE

, and R OTH

.

PER CURIAM:

¶1 Greg Hollenbach seeks review of the Salt Lake City Civil

Service Commission’s December 13, 2012 discovery and pre

‐ hearing order. This matter is before the court on Salt Lake City

Corporation’s motion for summary disposition based upon lack of

jurisdiction. 1Hollenbach v. Salt Lake City Civil Service Commission

20121073

‐ CA 2013 UT App 62 2 ¶2 Utah Code section 10

‐ 3

‐ 1012.5 describes when a decision of

a civil service commission can be reviewed by this court. See Utah

Code Ann. § 10

‐ 3

‐ 1012.5 (LexisNexis 2012). Specifically, only a

“final action or order of the commission may be appealed.” Id. The

Utah Supreme Court has outlined a three

‐ part test to determine if

an agency action is final:

(1) Has administrative decisionmaking reached a

stage where judicial review will not disrupt the

orderly process of adjudication?;

(2) Have rights or obligations been determined or

will legal consequences flow from the agency action?;

and

(3) Is the agency action, in whole or in part, not

preliminary, preparatory, procedural, or intermedi

‐

ate with regard to subsequent agency action?

Union Pac. R.R. Co. v. State Tax Comm’n

, 2000 UT 40, ¶ 16, 999 P.2d

17.

¶3 The December 13, 2012 order is not final. First, judicial

review of the discovery and “pre

‐ trial” order would certainly

disrupt the orderly process of adjudication. It would delay final

resolution of the proceeding. Second, no rights or obligations have

been determined by the Civil Service Commission, which merely

defined the scope of discovery and a procedure for the final

hearing. Finally, the order is clearly a preliminary, preparatory and

procedural order, which anticipates further action by the Civil

Service Commission. Therefore, the December 13, 2012 order is not

a final order. Accordingly, this court has no jurisdiction to review

the order. See Utah Code Ann. § 10

‐ 3

‐ 1012.5. When a court lacks

jurisdiction, it “retains only the authority to dismiss the action.”

Varian

‐ Eimac, Inc. v. Lamoreaux

, 767 P.2d 569, 570 (Utah Ct. App.

1989).Hollenbach v. Salt Lake City Civil Service Commission

20121073

‐ CA 2013 UT App 62 3 ¶4 Accordingly, the petition for review is dismissed without

prejudice to the filing of a timely appeal from a final order.
From: Raj Rao/RTP/USEPA/US

To: "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov > Date: 08/09/2010 05:49 PM Subject: Final SIP Files

GHG SIP Call Proposal_8-9-2010 to OMB’s RLSO.doc G HG SIP Call Proposal_8-9-2010.doc

FIP Files will follow Raj Rao, P.E. Group Leader, NSRG OAQPS/AQPD(MD- C504-03)

109 TW Alexander Drive RTP, NC 27709

919-541-5344
919-541-5509 fax

Note: Positions or views expressed here do not rep resent official EPA policy. Interagency deliberati ve and Confidential.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Meridian Resource Corporation
Houston, Texas

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Prospectus
constituting a part of the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Files No.
333-86788, No. 333-40009, No. 333-83737, and No. 333-83735) and Form S-3 (Files
No. 333-41940, No. 333-75414, No. 333-89620 and No. 333-116240) of our reports
dated March 13, 2007, relating to the consolidated financial statements and to
the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting
which appear in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

                                        BDO Seidman, LLP

Houston, Texas
March 14, 2007
# EUR-Lex - 12008E026 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008E026

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - PART THREE: UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS - TITLE I: THE INTERNAL MARKET - Article 26 (ex Article 14 TEC) **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0059 - 0059 *

Article 26

(ex Article 14 TEC)

1. The Union shall adopt measures with the aim of establishing or ensuring the functioning of the internal market, in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Treaties.

2. The internal market shall comprise an area without internal frontiers in which the free movement of goods, persons, services and capital is ensured in accordance with the provisions of the Treaties.

3. The Council, on a proposal from the Commission, shall determine the guidelines and conditions necessary to ensure balanced progress in all the sectors concerned.

--------------------------------------------------
# EUR-Lex - 12005SPN07/03 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12005SPN07/03

**Protocol concerning the conditions and arrangements for admission of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania to the European Union - Annex VII:List referred to in Article 20 of the Protocol: transitional measures, Romania - 3.Free movement of capital **

*
Official Journal L 157 , 21/06/2005 P. 0142 - 0142 *

3. FREE MOVEMENT OF CAPITAL

Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe.

1. Notwithstanding the obligations under the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe, Romania may maintain in force for five years from the date of accession the restrictions laid down in its legislation, existing at the time of signature of the Treaty of Accession, on the acquisition of ownership over land for secondary residences by nationals of the Member States or the States which are a party to the European Economic Area Agreement (EEAA) non-resident in Romania and by companies formed in accordance with the laws of another Member State or of an EEAA State and being neither established nor having a branch or a representative agency in the territory of Romania.

Nationals of the Member States and nationals of the States which are a party to the European Economic Area Agreement who are legally resident in Romania shall not be subject to the provisions of the preceding subparagraph or to any rules and procedures other than those to which nationals of Romania are subject.

2. Notwithstanding the obligations under the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe, Romania may maintain in force for seven years from the date of accession the restrictions laid down in its legislation, existing at the time of signature of the Treaty of Accession, on the acquisition of agricultural land, forests and forestry land by nationals of the Member States, by nationals of the States which are a party to the European Economic Area Agreement and by companies formed in accordance with the laws of another Member State or an EEAA State which are neither established nor registered in Romania. In no instance may a national of a Member State be treated less favourably in respect of the acquisition of agricultural land, forests and forestry land than at the date of signature of the Accession Treaty or be treated in a more restrictive way than a national of a third country.

Self-employed farmers who are nationals of another Member State and who wish to establish themselves and reside in Romania, shall not be subject to the provisions of the preceding subparagraph or to any procedures other than those to which nationals of Romania are subject.

A general review of these transitional measures shall be held in the third year following the date of accession. To this effect, the Commission shall submit a report to the Council. The Council may, acting unanimously on a proposal from the Commission, decide to shorten or terminate the transitional period indicated in the first subparagraph.

--------------------------------------------------
#### James Talcott, Appellant, *v.*The Wabash Railroad Company, Respondent.

(Argued April 17, 1907;

decided May 7, 1907.)

*Talcott*v. *Wabash Railroad Co.,*109 App. Div. 491, affirmed.

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered February 16, 1906, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a .dismissal of the complaint by the court at a Trial Term without a jury in an action under a contract of carriage to recover the value of baggage destroyed.

*Thomas H. Rothwell*for appellant.

*AdeTbert Moot*and *Helen Z. M. Rogers*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Hiscock, JJ.
#### Frank Russell, Respondent, *v.*National Exhibition Company, Appellant.

(Argued April 15, 1907;

decided April 30, 1907.)

*Russell*v. *National Exhibition Co.,*103 App. Div. 609, affirmed.

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered April 13, 1905, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover .an amount alleged to be due under a contract for services.

*Cornelitts J. Sullivan, De Lancey JViooll*and *Raymond I). Thttrber*for appellant.

*John M. Ward*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Hisoook, JJ.
# EUR-Lex - 12002E008 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 12002E008

**Treaty establishing the European Community (Nice consolidated version) - Part One: Principles - Article 8 - Article 4a - EC Treaty (Maastricht consolidated version) - **

*
Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0042 - 0042 Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0183 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0009 - Consolidated version *

Treaty establishing the European Community (Nice consolidated version)

Part One: Principles

Article 8

Article 4a - EC Treaty (Maastricht consolidated version)

Article 8

A European system of central banks (hereinafter referred to as "ESCB") and a European Central Bank (hereinafter referred to as "ECB") shall be established in accordance with the procedures laid down in this Treaty; they shall act within the limits of the powers conferred upon them by this Treaty and by the Statute of the ESCB and of the ECB (hereinafter referred to as "Statute of the ESCB") annexed thereto.