1

September 9, 2015 

Attn:

U. S. Department of Transportation Docket Operations 

West Building Ground Floor, Room w12-140 

1200 New Jersey Ave, 

SE Washington, DC 20590

David Bochkay requests an exemption from the requirements of title 14 of the Code of Federal 

Regulations:

SECTIONS 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), 

AND 91.417(a) & (b) CONCERNING COMMERCIAL OPERATION OF DJI Phantom 3 Professional

UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS PURSUANT TO SECTION 333 OF THE FAA MODERNIZATION 

AND REFORM ACT OF 2012 (PUBLIC LAW 112-95)

Sincerely,

David Bochkay

21 Colonial Rd

Morristown NJ, 07960
2

CONTENTS

GLOSSARY OF ABBREVIATIONS ..........................................................................................................3

SUMMARY................................................................................................................................................4

INTRODUCTION AND INTERESTS OF THE PETITIONER....................................................................4

BACKGROUND ........................................................................................................................................4

BASIS FOR PETITION .............................................................................................................................5

Name And Address Of The Petitioner..............................................................................................6

The Specific Sections Of 14 C.F.R. From Which David Bochkay Seeks Exemption. .....................6

The Extent Of Relief David Bochkay Seeks And The Reason David Bochkay Seeks The Relief...8

The Reasons Why Granting The David Bochkay Request Would Be In The Public Interest; That 

Is, How It Would Benefit The Public As A Whole...........................................................................10

The Reasons Why Granting The Exemption Would Not Adversely Affect Safety, Or How The 

Exemption Would Provide A Level Of Safety At Least Equal To That Provided By The Rule From 

Which David Bochkay Seeks Exemption.......................................................................................11

A Summary That Can Be Published In The Federal Register, stating: .........................................20

CONCLUSION ........................................................................................................................................20

APPENDICES.........................................................................................................................................22
3

GLOSSARY OF ABBREVIATIONS

AGL Above Ground Level

AOI Area of Interest

ATC Air Traffic Control

ATO Air Traffic Organization

AV Aerial Vehicle

CFR Code of Federal Regulations

COA Certificate of Authorization

FAA Federal Aviation Administration

FAR Federal Aviation Regulation 

GCS Ground Control Station 

GPS Global Positioning System

LOL Loss of Link 

NAS National Airspace System

NOTAM Notice to Airman

PIC Pilot In Command

POH Pilot Operating Handbook

Section 333 FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA) 

SO Safety Observer

SOP Standard Operating Procedures

UA Unmanned Aircraft

UAS Unmanned Aircraft System

VFR Visual Flight Rules

VLOS Visual Line of Site

VMC Visual Meteorological Conditions

VTOL Vertical Takeoff and Landing
4

SUMMARY 

David Bochkay seeks exemption from the requirements of 14 C.F.R §§ 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a),91.121, 

91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b), to operate an Unmanned 

Aircraft System (DJI Phantom 3) pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 

2012 (FMRA). This exemption will permit David Bochkay to operate an Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) 

for the commercial purpose of conducting aerial video and photography of construction sites, residential 

and commercial real estate, civil landscapes and events over certain areas of the United States.

INTRODUCTION AND INTERESTS OF THE PETITIONER

David Bochkay provides clients with video and still image content using small UAV platforms. It is also his

intention to provide government and business entities training and consulting services on small UAV 

systems.

The objective of his aerial operations is to provide a more affordable alternative to acquire aerial footage 

and imagery for a variety of governmental, commercial, public, and residential uses, specifically targeting:

• Agriculture 

• Appraisals

• Real-estate marketing

• Civic landmarks

• Inspection of various nature (construction etc...)

• Private and governmental training

David Bochkay is a Private Pilot (Single Engine Land) with an instrument rating.

BACKGROUND 

Unmanned Aircraft Systems: DJI Phantom 3, UAS 

David Bochkay seeks an exemption to operate DJI Phantom 3 systems for compensation or hire within 

the NAS. The DJI Phantom 3 is vertical takeoff and landing (VTOL) Unmanned Aircraft (UA) with a 

Ground Control Station (GCS) utilizing electronic tablet or smart phone systems. The DJI Phantom 3 has 

a maximum gross weight of approximately 2.8 lb. while having a diagonal dimension of 23.2”, a maximum 

speed of approximately 16.4’fps and a maximum flying height of 400'. The DJI Phantom 3 is equipped 

with four main rotors; driven by Lithium Polymer battery powered electric motors. 5 The DJI Phantom 3 

that will be operated by David Bochkay and will be registered in accordance with 49 U.S.C. 44103, 

Registration of Aircraft, as well as 14 C.F.R Part 47, Aircraft Registration, and marked in accordance with 

14 C.F.R. Part 45, Identification and Registration Marking.
5

BASIS FOR PETITION

Petitioner, David Bochkay, pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 C.F.R. § 

11.61) and the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA), Section 333, Special Rules for 

Certain Unmanned Aircraft Systems, hereby petitions the Administrator to commercially operate the DJI 

Phantom 3, UAS in the National Airspace System (NAS), and for an exemption from the requirements of 

14 C.F.R §§ 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), 

and 91.417(a) & (b). 

In consideration of the speed, weight, size, and limited operating area associated with the unmanned 

aircraft and its operation, David Bochkay’s operation of DJI Phantom 3 UAS meets the conditions of 

FMRA Section 333 and therefore, will not require an airworthiness certificate in accordance with 14 

C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H. 

Accordingly, David Bochkay requests relief from Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), 

and 91.417(a) & (b), as these sections set forth requirements for maintenance that only apply to aircraft 

with an airworthiness certificate. 

David Bochkay submits that the requested relief is appropriate since an equivalent level of safety will be 

ensured. David Bochkay will perform maintenance, and alterations on the UAS using the methods, 

techniques, and practices prescribed in the operating documents (i.e., Monthly Maintenance Log, and DJI 

Phantom 3 Instruction Manual). Furthermore, David Bochkay will document and maintain all maintenance 

records for the DJI Phantom 3 UAS. 

Relief from certain requirements of Section 61.113(a) and (b), entitled Private Pilot Privileges and 

Limitations: Pilot in command, is requested by David Bochkay to the extent necessary to allow a Pilot in 

Command (PIC) holding a private pilot or higher level certificate, as well as an airman medical certificate, 

and who has demonstrated, by meeting minimum flight hour and currency requirements, so that the PIC 

is able to safely operate the UAS in a manner consistent with this exemption, including evasive and 

emergency maneuvers and maintaining appropriate distances from people, vessels, vehicles and 

structures. 

David Bochkay seeks relief from Section 91.7(a), entitled Civil aircraft airworthiness, because the DJI 

Phantom 3 UAS does not require an airworthiness certificate in accordance with 14 C.F.R. Part 21, 

Subpart H. As such, David Bochkay submits that they will ensure that the DJI Phantom 3 UAS is in an 

airworthy condition, prior to every flight, by determining that the UAS are in compliance with the operating 

documents and that the aircraft are in a condition for safe flight. 

David Bochkay also seeks an exemption from the requirements of Section 91.121, entitled Altimeter 

Settings, as the DJI Phantom 3 UAS will not have a typical barometric altimeter onboard. However, 

altitude information of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS will be provided to the PIC via Global Positioning System 

(GPS) equipment and radio communications telemetry data link, which downlinks from the UA to the 

ground control system for active monitoring of the flight path. This altitude information, combined with the

operation of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS within visual line of sight, at or below 400 feet AGL, will ensure a 

level of safety equivalent to Section 91.121. 

Additionally, David Bochkay seeks an exemption from the requirements of Section 91.151(b), entitled 

Fuel requirements for flight in VFR conditions. David Bochkay submits that safety will not be affected by 

operation of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS during daylight hours in visual meteorological conditions (VMC) 

under visual flight rules (VFR), with enough battery power to fly for a total duration of approximately 23 
6

minutes. Battery power indicators are also able to show exactly how much battery power is left, as well as 

how much time is needed to return safely back to point of take off. 

In accordance with 14 C.F.R. § 11.81, David Bochkay provides the following information in support of its 

petition for exemption:

A. Name And Address Of The Petitioner. 

The name and address of the Petitioner and point of contact is: 

David Bochkay

21 Colonial Rd.

Morristown NJ 07960

B. The Specific Sections Of 14 C.F.R. From Which David Bochkay Seeks Exemption. 

1. David Bochkay seeks exemption from the requirements of section 61.113(a) and (b). 

Section 61.113, entitled Private pilot privileges and limitations: Pilot in command, subsections (a) 

and (b) prescribe the following, in relevant part: 

(a) No person who holds a private pilot certificate may act as a pilot in command (PIC) of an 

aircraft that is carrying passengers or property for compensation or hire; nor may that person, for 

compensation or hire, act as PIC of an aircraft. 

(b) A private pilot may, for compensation or hire, act as PIC of an aircraft in connection with any 

business or employment if—

(1) The flight is only incidental to that business or employment; and 

(2) The aircraft does not carry passengers or property for compensation or hire. 

2. David Bochkay seeks exemption from the requirements of section 91.7(a).

Section 91.7, entitled Civil aircraft airworthiness, subsection (a), states the following: 

(a) No person may operate a civil aircraft unless it is in an airworthy condition. 

3. David Bochkay seeks exemption from the requirements of Section 91.121. 

Section 91.121, entitled Altimeter settings, subsection (a), states the following, in part: 

(a) Each person operating an aircraft shall maintain the cruising altitude or flight level of that aircraft, 

as the case may be, by reference to an altimeter that is set, when operating-- (1) Below 18,000 feet 

MSL, to—

(i) The current reported altimeter setting of a station along the route and within 100 nautical 

miles of the aircraft; 
7

(ii) If there is no station within the area prescribed in paragraph (a)(1)(i) of this section, the 

current reported altimeter setting of an appropriate available station; or 

(iii) In the case of an aircraft not equipped with a radio, the elevation of the departure airport 

or an appropriate altimeter setting available before departure. 

4. David Bochkay seeks exemption from the requirements of section 91.151(b). 

Section 91.151, entitled Fuel requirements for flight in VFR conditions, subsection (b), states the 

following: 

(b) No person may begin a flight in a rotorcraft under VFR conditions unless (considering wind 

and forecast weather conditions) there is enough fuel to fly to the first point of intended landing 

and, assuming normal cruising speed, to fly after that for at least 20 minutes. 

5. David Bochkay seeks exemption from the requirements of section 91.405(a). 

Section 91.405, entitled Maintenance required, subsection (a), states the following: 

Each owner or operator of an aircraft— (a) Shall have that aircraft inspected as prescribed in 

subpart E of this part and shall between required inspections, except as provided in paragraph (c) 

of this section, have discrepancies repaired as prescribed in part 43 of this chapter[.] 

6. David Bochkay seeks exemption from the requirements of section 91.407(a)(1) 

Section 91.407, entitled Operation after maintenance, preventive maintenance, rebuilding, or 

alteration, subsection (a)(1), states the following: 

(a) No person may operate any aircraft that has undergone maintenance, preventive 

maintenance, rebuilding, or alteration unless-- (1) It has been approved for return to service by a 

person authorized under § 43.7 of this chapter[.] 

7. David Bochkay seeks exemption from the requirements of sections 91.409(a)(1) and 91.409(a)(2). 

Section 91.409, entitled Inspections, subsection (a), states the following: 

(a) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, no person may operate an aircraft unless, 

within the preceding 12 calendar months, it has had -- (1) An annual inspection in accordance 

with part 43 of this chapter and has been approved for return to service by a person authorized by 

§ 43.7 of this chapter; or (2) An inspection for the issuance of an airworthiness certificate in 

accordance with part 21 of this chapter. 

8. David Bochkay seeks exemption from the requirements of sections 91.417(a) and 91.417(b). 

Section 91.417, entitled Maintenance records, subsections (a) and (b), state the following: 

(a) Except for work performed in accordance with §§ 91.411 and 91.413, each registered owner 

or operator shall keep the following records for the periods specified in paragraph (b) of this 

section: (1) Records of the maintenance, preventive maintenance, and alteration and records of 

the 100-hour, annual, progressive, and other required or approved inspections, as appropriate, 

for each aircraft (including the airframe) and each engine, propeller, rotor, and appliance of an 

aircraft. The records must include—
8

(i) A description (or reference to data acceptable to the Administrator) of the work performed; and 

(ii) The date of completion of the work performed; and 

(iii) The signature, and certificate number of the person approving the aircraft for return to service. 

(2) Records containing the following information: 

(i) The total time in service of the airframe, each engine, each propeller, and each rotor. 

(ii) The current status of life-limited parts of each airframe, engine, propeller, rotor, and appliance. 

(iii) The time since last overhaul of all items installed on the aircraft which are required to be 

overhauled on a specified time basis. 

(iv) The current inspection status of the aircraft, including the time since the last inspection 

required by the inspection program under which the aircraft and its appliances are maintained. 

(v) The current status of applicable airworthiness directives (AD) and safety directives including, 

for each, the method of compliance, the AD or safety directive number and revision date. If the 

AD or safety directive involves recurring action, the time and date when the next action is 

required. (vi) Copies of the forms prescribed by § 43.9(d) of this chapter for each major alteration 

to the airframe and currently installed engines, rotors, propellers, and appliances. 

(b) The owner or operator shall retain the following records for the periods prescribed: 

(1) The records specified in paragraph (a)(1) of this section shall be retained until the work is 

repeated or superseded by other work or for 1 year after the work is performed. 

(2) The records specified in paragraph (a)(2) of this section shall be retained and transferred with 

the aircraft at the time the aircraft is sold. 

(3) A list of defects furnished to a registered owner or operator under § 43.11 of this chapter shall 

be retained until the defects are repaired and the aircraft is approved for return to service. 

C. The Extent Of Relief David Bochkay Seeks And The Reason David Bochkay Seeks The Relief.

1. Extent Of Relief David Bochkay Seeks And The Reason David Bochkay Seeks Relief From Section 

61.113(a) And (b). 

Relief from Section 61.113(a) and (b) entitled Private pilot privileges and limitations: Pilot in command, is 

requested to the extent necessary to allow a PIC holding a private pilot or higher level certificate, as well 

as a current and valid airman medical certificate, and who has met certain flight-hour and currency 

requirements, to conduct the proposed UAS flight operations for compensation or hire. 

This relief is requested since the limitations set forth in Section 61.113(a) and (b) state that a private pilot 

may, for compensation or hire, act as PIC of an aircraft in connection with any business or employment if: 

(1) The flight is only incidental to that business or employment; and (2) The aircraft does not carry 

passengers or property for compensation or hire. 
9

As set forth more fully below, David Bochkay submits that an equivalent level of safety will be maintained 

because no PIC will be allowed to operate the DJI Phantom 3 Professional UAS unless that PIC has a 

Private Pilot Certificate (Airplane Single Engine Land) and has met certain flight-hour and currency 

requirements, demonstrating that the PIC is able to safely operate either the DJI Phantom 3 Professional 

UAS in a manner consistent with the operations specifications as described in this exemption, including 

evasive and emergency maneuvers, as well as maintaining appropriate distances from people, vessels, 

vehicles and structures. 

2. Extent Of Relief David Bochkay Seeks And The Reason David Bochkay Seeks Relief From Section 

91.7(a). 

Relief from Section 91.7(a) entitled Civil aircraft airworthiness, is requested to the extent required to allow 

David Bochkay to determine that the DJI Phantom 3 Professional UAS are in airworthy condition prior to 

every flight by ensuring that the UAS is in compliance with the operating documents. David Bochkay

seeks the requested relief because the DJI Phantom 3 Professional UAS do not require an airworthiness 

certificate in accordance with 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H. Therefore, David Bochkay will ensure that the 

DJI Phantom 3 Professional UAS are in airworthy condition based upon its compliance with the operating 

documents (i.e., Monthly Maintenance Log, and DJI Phantom 3 Professional POH) prior to every flight.

3. Extent Of Relief David Bochkay Seeks And The Reason David Bochkay Seeks Relief From Section 

91.121. 

Relief from Section 91.121, entitled Altimeter settings, may be required to allow flight operations of the 

DJI Phantom 3 Professional UAS, which utilize a barometric pressure sensor, GPS equipment, and a 

radio communications telemetry data link to downlink altitude information from the UA to the PIC at the 

ground control station (GCS). Since the FAA requires that any altitude information concerning UAS 

operations be reported to air traffic control (ATC) in feet above ground level (AGL), David Bochkay seeks 

the requested relief because the DJI Phantom 3 Professional UA’s altimeter may be set on the ground to 

zero feet AGL, rather than the local barometric pressure or field altitude, before each flight. Considering 

the limited altitude of the proposed operations, relief from 14 CFR 91.121 is sought to the extent 

necessary to comply with the applicable conditions and limitations stated below. As more fully set forth 

herein, an equivalent level of safety will be maintained since the DJI Phantom 3 Professional UAS are 

equipped with a barometric pressure sensor and GPS equipment, which automatically ensures that a 

ground level pressure setting will be established prior to each flight, and provides the PIC with altitude 

information of the UA on the heads-up display of the GCS. 

4. Extent Of Relief David Bochkay Seeks And The Reason David Bochkay Seeks Relief From Section 

91.151(b). 

Relief from Section 91.151(b) entitled Fuel requirements for flight in VFR conditions, is requested to the 

extent required to allow flights of the battery powered DJI Phantom 3 Professional UAS during daylight 

hours in visual meteorological conditions (VMC), under visual flight rules (VFR), for a total duration of 23 

minutes. The David Bochkay seeks the requested relief because without an exemption from Section 

91.151(b), the flight time duration of the battery powered DJI Phantom 3 Professional UAS will severely 

constrain the practicality of any aerial video or still photo flight operations that David Bochkay proposes to 

conduct pursuant to this Petition. Significantly, as set forth below, the technical specifications of the DJI 

Phantom 3 Professional UAS, the DJI Phantom 3 Professional operating documents, and David 
10

Bochkay’s proposed operating limitations, ensure that David Bochkay will safely operate the battery 

powered DJI Phantom 3 Professional UAS during daylight hours in visual meteorological conditions 

(VMC), under visual flight rules (VFR), with enough battery power to fly for a total duration of 23 minutes. 

5. Extent Of Relief David Bochkay Seeks And The Reason David Bochkay Seeks Relief From Sections 

91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), And 91.417(a) & (b). 

Since Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b) only apply to aircraft 

with an airworthiness certificate, David Bochkay requests relief from these Sections because the DJI 

Phantom 3 Professional UAS do not require airworthiness certificates. The DJI Phantom 3 Professional 

UAS meets the conditions of FMRA Section 333 for operation without an airworthiness certificate. David 

Bochkay will use trained technicians to perform maintenance, alterations, or preventive maintenance on 

the UAS using the methods, techniques, and practices prescribed in the UAS POH, and will document 

and maintain all maintenance records for the DJI Phantom 3 Professional UAS. 

D. The Reasons Why Granting The David Bochkay Request Would Be In The Public Interest; That

Is, How It Would Benefit The Public As A Whole. 

Granting the present Petition will further the public interest by allowing David Bochkay to safely, 

efficiently, and economically perform aerial video and photography of construction sites, real estate, 

events and civic landscape over certain areas of the United States. 

Additionally, use of the DJI Phantom 3 Professional UAS will decrease congestion of the NAS, reduce 

pollution, and provide significant benefits to the economy. Notably, the benefits of David Bochkay’

proposed operation of the DJI Phantom 3 Professional UAS will be realized without implicating any 

privacy issues. 

1. The Public Will Benefit From Decreased Congestion Of The NAS. 

The DJI Phantom 3 Professional UAS are battery powered and serve as a safe, efficient, and economical 

alternative to the manned aircraft traditionally utilized to obtain aerial imagery. By reducing the amount of 

manned aircraft needed to perform aerial acquisitions, an exemption allowing the use of a DJI Phantom 3 

Professional UAS would reduce the amount of manned aircraft in the NAS, reduce noise and air pollution, 

as well as increase the safety of life and property in the air and on the ground. Furthermore, by reducing 

the number of manned aircraft operating in the NAS, congestion around airports caused by arriving and

departing aircraft will be reduced. The DJI Phantom 3 Professional UAS do not require an airport to 

takeoff or land. Likewise, a reduction of manned aircraft conducting aerial video and photography 

missions would result in fewer aircraft that must be handled by air traffic control during the ground, 

takeoff, departure, arrival, and landing phases of flight operations. 

2. The Public Will Benefit From The Safety And Efficiency Of The DJI Phantom 3 Professional UAS. 

Conducting aerial acquisitions with the DJI Phantom 3 Professional UAS, instead of manned aircraft, will 

greatly benefit the public by drastically reducing the levels of air and noise pollution generated during 

traditional aerial video and still photography flight operations. By using battery power and electric motors, 

the DJI Phantom 3 Professional UAS produce no air pollution, and is the most viable environmentally 

conscious alternative to the cabin class, four to six cylinder internal combustion engine aircraft that are 

typically utilized for aerial video and photography, while burning approximately 10-20 gallons per hour of 

leaded aviation fuel. The DJI Phantom 3 Professional UAS, while reducing the carbon footprint of aerial 
11

acquisitions, also eliminates noise pollution, as the UAS are propelled by battery powered electric motors, 

rather than an internal combustion engine. By using the DJI Phantom 3 Professional UAS to perform 

aerial acquisitions, the substantial risk to life and property in the air and on the ground, which is usually 

associated with traditional manned aircraft flight operations, will be substantially reduced or completely 

eliminated. Aside from the lack of flight crew members located onboard the aircraft, the DJI Phantom 3 

Professional UAS (weighing approximately 2.8 pounds at their maximum gross weight with diagonal 

dimension of 23.2 inches, and with no fuel on board), has less physical potential for collateral damage to 

life and property on the ground, and in the air, compared to the manned aircraft that typically conduct 

similar operations.

3. Performing Aerial Video and Photography Operations With The DJI Phantom 3 Professional UAS Will 

Benefit The Economy. 

In addition to being safe and efficient, the DJI Phantom 3 Professional UAS are also an economical 

alternative to using manned aircraft to conduct similar aerial operations. As such, operation of the DJI 

Phantom 3 Professional UAS will allow United States based companies to remain competitive and 

contribute to growth of the U.S. economy. Specifically, with the rising cost of aviation fuel and the 

Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) regulatory actions phasing out leaded aviation fuels, U.S. 

owned and operated companies must adopt new and alternative technology in order to remain 

competitive. Operating the battery powered DJI Phantom 3 Professional UAS is one such technology that 

not only allows companies greater operational flexibility compared to manned aircraft, but provides such 

flexibility without the high operational cost of a traditional manned aircraft. By operating the DJI Phantom 

3 Professional UAS, companies can remain competitive and profitable, and therefore, provide greater job 

stability to employees and contractors, which will ultimately contribute to growth of the U.S. economy. 

4. There Are No Privacy Issues. 

David Bochkay’ proposed operation of the DJI Phantom 3 Professional UAS will not create any privacy 

issues. Specifically, the DJI Phantom 3 Professional UAS will be operated only in compliance with 

operating documents which requires property owner involvement as well as local law enforcement 

notification, and in accordance with the Federal Aviation Regulations, including the minimum altitude 

requirements of 14 C.F.R. § 91.119. 

E. The Reasons Why Granting The Exemption Would Not Adversely Affect Safety, Or How The 

Exemption Would Provide A Level Of Safety At Least Equal To That Provided By The Rule From 

Which David Bochkay Seeks Exemption. 

1. Reasons Why The DJI Phantom 3 Professional UAS Meet The Conditions Of The FAA Modernization 

and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA) Section 333. 

In consideration of the size, weight, speed, and limited operating area associated with the unmanned 

aircraft and its operation, David Bochkay operation of the DJI Phantom 3 Professional UAS meet the 

conditions of FMRA Section 333, and will not require an airworthiness certificate in accordance with 14 

C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H. 

Section 333 provides authority for a UAS to operate without airworthiness certification and sets forth 

requirements for considering whether a UAS will create a hazard to users of the NAS or the public, or 

otherwise pose a threat to national security. Specifically, FMRA Section 333 states the following, in part: 
12

(a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other requirement of this subtitle, and not later than 180 

days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Transportation shall determine if 

certain unmanned aircraft systems may operate safely in the national airspace system before 

completion of the plan and rulemaking required by section 332 of this Act or the guidance 

required by section 334 of this Act.

(b) Assessment of Unmanned Aircraft Systems.--In making the determination under subsection 

(a), the Secretary shall determine, at a minimum—

(1) which types of unmanned aircraft systems, if any, as a result of their size, weight, 

speed, operational capability, proximity to airports and populated areas, and operation 

within visual line of sight do not create a hazard to users of the national airspace system 

or the public or pose a threat to national security; and 

(2) whether a certificate of waiver, certificate of authorization, or airworthiness 

certification under section 44704 of title 49, United States Code, is required for the 

operation of unmanned aircraft systems identified under paragraph (1). 

(c) Requirements for Safe Operation.--If the Secretary determines under this section that certain 

unmanned aircraft systems may operate safely in the national airspace system, the Secretary 

shall establish requirements for the safe operation of such aircraft systems in the national 

airspace system. 

In seeking this exemption, David Bochkay submits that the DJI Phantom 3 Professional UAS can operate 

safely in the NAS pursuant to FMRA Section 333, as demonstrated by: (a) the characteristics of the DJI 

Phantom 3 Professional UAS; (b) the pilot certification requirement; and (c) the specific operating 

limitations. 

a. The Specifications Of The DJI Phantom 3 Professional UAS Demonstrate Its Safe Characteristics. 

The DJI Phantom 3 Professional UAS does not create a hazard to users of the NAS or the public, or 

otherwise pose a threat to national security considering its size, weight, speed, and operational capability. 

i. Technical specifications of the DJI Phantom 3 Professional UAS. 

The technical specifications of the DJI Phantom 3 Professional UAS are set forth by the DJI 

Phantom 3 Professional User Manual, attached hereto as Appendix A. 

ii. The DJI Phantom 3 Professional UAS global positioning modes enable the uas to remain within 

a defined operational area. 

The DJI Phantom 3 Professional UAS may be operated in both manual and global positioning 

flight modes. A complete description of the flight and navigational modes of the DJI Phantom 3 

Professional UAS is provided at pages 11 of the DJI Phantom 3 Professional User Manual 

attached hereto as Appendix A. 

iii. The DJI Phantom 3 Professional UAS are designed for automatic return to home point or 

hover in the event of loss of the control link or navigation. 

When the Control Link is lost, the DJI Phantom 3 Professional UAS will remain stationary, in 

flight, for 3 seconds or more. If, after 3 seconds, the DJI Phantom 3 Professional UAS does not 

reacquire control link data from the GCS, the UAS will assume that the Control Link is lost and 
13

the will return to the home position (i.e., failsafe mode) via GPS, and will descend to the takeoff 

position and shutdown. A complete description of the Failsafe Functions of the DJI Phantom 3 

Professional UAS are set forth at pages 12 through 14 of the DJI Phantom 3 Professional User 

Manual, attached hereto as Appendix A. 

iv. The DJI Phantom 3 Professional GCS and its operation. 

A complete description of the operation and specifications of the DJI Phantom 3 Professional 

GCS and flight control software is provided at pages 23 through 29 of the DJI Phantom 3 

Professional User Manual. DJI Phantom 3 Professional User Manual is attached hereto as 

Appendix A. 

b. Flight operations of DJI Phantom 3 Professional UAS is limited to the line of sight of a certificated pilot 

in command. 

David Bochkay staff in possession of a valid Private Pilot Certificate (Single Engine Land) will be the only 

persons to act as a pilot in command (PIC) of the DJI Phantom 3 Professional UAS. 

c. Flights of DJI Phantom 3 Professional UAS will be conducted pursuant to specific operating limitations. 

In seeking this exemption, David Bochkay proposes to commercially operate DJI Phantom 3 Professional 

UAS for the special purpose of conducting aerial video and photography over certain areas of United 

States, pursuant to the following specific operating limitations. 

1. Operations authorized by this grant of exemption will be limited to the following aircraft described in the 

operating documents, rotorcraft UAS weighing less than 55 pounds maximum gross weight: DJI Phantom 

3 Professional Unmanned Aircraft Systems. Proposed operations of any other aircraft will require a new 

petition or a petition to amend this grant. 

2. UAS operations under this exemption will be limited to conducting operations for the purpose of aerial 

video and photography. 

3. The UAS may not be flown at an indicated airspeed exceeding 20 knots. 

4. The UA must be operated at an altitude of no more than 400 feet above ground level (AGL), as 

indicated by the procedures specified in the operating documents unless a special request is made and 

approved by ATC. All altitudes reported to ATC must be in feet AGL. 

5. The UAS must be operated within visual line of sight (VLOS) of the PIC at all times. This requires the 

PIC to be able to use human vision unaided by any device other than corrective lenses, as specified on 

the PIC’s FAA-issued airman medical certificate. 

6. The use of first person view (FPV) by the PIC or safety observer (SO) is not permitted.

7. All operations must utilize a safety observer (SO). The SO may be used to satisfy the VLOS 

requirement as long as the PIC always maintains VLOS capability. The SO and PIC must be able to 

communicate verbally at all times. Electronic messaging or texting is not permitted during flight 

operations. The PIC must be designated before the flight and cannot transfer his or her designation for 

the duration of the flight. The PIC must ensure that the SO can perform the functions prescribed in the 

operating documents. 
14

8. The SO must not perform any other duties beyond assisting the PIC with seeing and avoiding other air 

traffic and other ground based obstacles/obstructions and is not permitted to operate the camera or other 

instruments. 

9. The operating documents and the grant of exemption must be accessible during UAS operations and 

made available to the Administrator upon request. If a discrepancy exists between the conditions and 

limitations contained in the grant of exemption and the procedures outlined in the operating documents, 

the conditions and limitations contained in the grant of exemption take precedence and must be followed. 

Otherwise, the operator must follow the procedures as outlined in its operating documents. The operator 

may update or revise its operating documents. It is the operator’s responsibility to track such revisions 

and present updated and revised documents to the Administrator upon request. The operator must also 

present updated and revised documents if it petitions for extension or amendment to the grant of 

exemption. If the operator determines that any update or revision would affect the basis upon which the 

FAA granted the exemption, then the operator must petition for amendment to its grant of exemption. The 

FAA’s UAS Integration Office (AFS-80) may be contacted if questions arise regarding updates or 

revisions to the operating documents. 

10. Prior to each flight the PIC must inspect the UAS to ensure that it is in a condition for safe flight. If the 

inspection reveals a condition that affects the safe operation of the UAS, the aircraft is prohibited from 

operating until the necessary maintenance has been performed and the UAS is found to be in a condition 

for safe flight. The Ground Control Station must be included in the preflight inspection. All maintenance 

and alterations must be properly documented in the aircraft records. 

11. Any UAS that has undergone maintenance or alterations that affect the UAS operation or flight 

characteristics, e.g. replacement of a flight critical component, must undergo a functional test flight. The 

PIC who conducts the functional test flight must make an entry in the aircraft records. 

12. The pre-flight inspection must account for all potential discrepancies, e.g. inoperable components, 

items, or equipment, not already covered in the relevant sections of the operating documents. 

13. The operator must follow the UAS manufacturer’s aircraft/component, maintenance, overhaul, 

replacement, inspection, and life limit requirements. 

14. The operator must carry out its maintenance, inspections, and record keeping requirements, in 

accordance with the operating documents. Maintenance, inspection, alterations, and status of 

replacement/overhaul component parts must be noted in the aircraft records, including total time in 

service, description of work accomplished, and the signature of the authorized person returning the UAS 

to service. 

15. Each UAS operated under this exemption must comply with all manufacturer Safety Bulletins. 

16. The authorized person must make an entry in the aircraft record of the corrective action taken against 

discrepancies discovered between inspections. 

17. The PIC must possess at least a private pilot certificate and at least a current third class medical 

certificate. 

18. The operator may not permit any PIC to operate unless the PIC meets the operator’s qualification 

criteria and demonstrates the ability to safely operate the UAS in a manner consistent with how the UAS 

will be operated under the exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers and maintaining 

appropriate distances from persons, vessels, vehicles and structures. PIC qualification flight hours must 
15

be logged in a manner consistent with 14 C.F.R. § 61.51(b). Flights for the purposes of training the 

operator’s PICs are permitted under the terms of the exemption. However, training operations may only 

be conducted during dedicated training sessions. During training, proficiency, and experience-building 

flights, all persons not essential for flight operations are considered nonparticipants, and the PIC must 

operate the UA with appropriate distance from nonparticipants in accordance with 14 C.F.R. § 91.119. 

19. UAS operations may not be conducted during night, as defined in 14 C.F.R. § 1.1. All operations must 

be conducted under visual meteorological conditions (VMC). If flight at night is required, a special request 

will be made at the FAA office closest to proposed area of operations. Flights under special visual flight 

rules (SVFR) are not authorized. 

20. The UA may not operate within 5 nautical miles of an airport reference point as denoted on a current 

FAA-published aeronautical chart unless a letter of agreement with that airport’s management is 

obtained, and the operation is conducted in accordance with a NOTAM as required by the operator’s 

COA. The letter of agreement with the airport management must be made available to the Administrator 

upon request. 

21. The UA may not be operated less than 500 feet below or less than 2,000 feet horizontally from a 

cloud or when visibility is less than 3 statute miles from the PIC. 

22. If the UA loses communications or loses its GPS signal, it must return to a predetermined location 

within the planned operating area and land or be recovered in accordance with the operating documents. 

23. The PIC must abort the flight in the event of unpredicted obstacles or emergencies in accordance with 

the operating documents. 

24. The PIC is prohibited from beginning a flight unless (considering wind and forecast weather 

conditions) there is enough power to fly at normal cruising speed to the intended landing point and land 

the UA with 25% battery power remaining. 

25. The operator must obtain an Air Traffic Organization (ATO) issued Certificate of Waiver or 

Authorization (COA) prior to conducting any operations under the grant of exemption. This COA will also 

require the operator to request a Notice to Airman (NOTAM) not more than 72 hours in advance, but not 

less than 48 hours prior to the operation. All operations shall be conducted in accordance with airspace 

requirements in the ATO issued COA including class of airspace, altitude level and potential transponder 

requirements. 

26. All aircraft operated in accordance with the exemption must be identified by serial number, registered 

in accordance with 14 C.F.R. part 47, and have identification (NNumber) markings in accordance with 14 

C.F.R. part 45, Subpart C. Markings must be as large as practicable. 

27. Before conducting operations, the radio frequency spectrum used for operation and control of the UA 

must comply with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) or other appropriate government 

oversight agency requirements. 

28. The documents required fewer than 14 C.F.R. 91.9 and 91.203 must be available to the PIC at the 

Ground Control Station of the UAS any time the UAS is operating. These documents must be made 

available to the Administrator or any law enforcement official upon request. 

29. The UA must remain clear and yield the right of way to all manned aviation operations and activities at 

all times. 
16

30. The UAS may not be operated by the PIC from any moving device or vehicle. 

31. Flight operations must be conducted at least 500 feet from all nonparticipating persons (persons other 

than the PIC, SO, operator trainees or essential persons), vessels, vehicles, and structures unless: 

a. Barriers or structures are present that sufficiently protect nonparticipating persons from the UA 

and/or debris in the event of an accident. The operator must ensure that nonparticipating persons 

remain under such protection. If a situation arises where nonparticipating persons leave such 

protection and are within 500 feet of the UA, flight operations must cease immediately and/or; 

b. The aircraft is operated near vessels, vehicles or structures where the owner/controller of such 

vessels, vehicles or structures has granted permission and the PIC has made a safety 

assessment of the risk of operating closer to those objects and determined that it does not 

present an undue hazard, and;

c. Operations nearer to the PIC, SO, operator trainees or essential persons do not present an 

undue hazard to those persons per § 91.119(a). 

32. All operations shall be conducted over private or controlled-access property with permission from the 

land owner/controller or authorized representative. Permission from land owner/controller or authorized 

representative will be obtained for each flight to be conducted. 

33. Any incident, accident, or flight operation that transgresses the lateral or vertical boundaries of the 

operational area as defined by the applicable COA must be reported to the FAA's UAS Integration Office 

(AFS-80) within 24 hours. Accidents must be reported to the National Transportation Safety Board 

(NTSB) per instructions contained on the NTSB Web site: www.ntsb.gov. 

2. Reasons Why An Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 61.113(a) And (b) Would Not 

Adversely Affect Safety. 

David Bochkay submits that the equivalent level of safety established by Section 61.113(a) and (b) will be 

maintained because no PIC will be allowed to operate the DJI Phantom 3 Professional UAS unless that 

PIC has demonstrated, by meeting minimum flight-hour and currency requirements, that the PIC is able to 

safely operate the DJI Phantom 3 Professional UAS in a manner consistent with the exemption, including 

evasive and emergency maneuvers and maintaining appropriate distances from people, vessels, vehicles 

and structures. 

Considering David Bochkay’ proposed area of operations, and the operating limitations set forth-above; 

the parallel nature of private pilot aeronautical knowledge requirements to those of commercial pilot 

requirements (See Exemption No. 11062); and the airmanship skills necessary to safely operate the DJI 

Phantom 3 Professional UAS, David Bochkay submits that the additional manned airmanship experience 

of a commercially certificated pilot would not correlate to the airmanship skills necessary for David 

Bochkay specific proposed flight operations. 

The FAA has previously granted relief from Section 61.113(a) and (b) specific to UAS, in circumstances 

similar, in all material respects, to those presented herein (e.g. Exemption Nos. 11062, 11063, 11064, 

11065, 11066, 11067, 11080, 11109, 11110, 11112, 11136, 11138, 11150, 11153, 11156, 11158, 11159, 

11160, 11161). 

Furthermore David Bochkay will not allow any PIC to operate the DJI Phantom 3 Professional UAS unless 

that PIC has demonstrated, by meeting minimum flight-hour requirements or the DJI Phantom 3 
17

Professional UAS training and currency requirements, that the PIC is able to safely operate the DJI 

Phantom 3 Professional UAS in a manner consistent with this exemption, including evasive and 

emergency maneuvers and maintaining appropriate distances from people, vessels, vehicles and 

structures. 

Specifically, the PIC must have accumulated and logged, in a manner consistent with 14 C.F.R. § 

61.51(b), 25 hours of total time as a UAS rotorcraft pilot (with a minimum of 5 hours of those 21 hours as 

a UAS pilot operating the same make and model of UAS to be used for operations under the exemption). 

In addition to the hour requirements, the PIC must accomplish 3 takeoffs and landings in the preceding 90 

days (for currency purposes). 

As in Exemption Nos. 11062, 11138, and 11153, prior documented flight experience that was obtained in 

compliance with applicable regulations will ensure an equivalent level of safety during David Bochkay’ 

proposed operations. The Administrator has held that prior documented flight experience that was 

obtained in compliance with applicable regulations would ensure safe operations, stating as follows: 

In Exemption No. 11062, the FAA required that prior to conducting operations for the purpose of motion 

picture filming (or similar operations), the PIC must have accumulated and logged, in a manner consistent 

with 14 CFR 61.51(b), 25 hours of total time as a UAS rotorcraft pilot including at least 10 hours logged 

as a UAS pilot with a multi-rotor UAS. Prior to operations under Exemption No. 11062, the PIC must also 

have accumulated and logged a minimum of 5 hours as a UAS pilot operating the same make and model 

of UAS to be used for operations under the exemption. For clarification, the FAA considers these 

minimum hour requirements to be inclusive rather than additive; i.e. 5 hours make and model time may 

be included in the 10 hours of multi-rotor time and the 10 hours may be included in the total 25 hours of 

UAS rotorcraft time. In addition to the hour requirements, the PIC must accomplish 3 takeoffs and 

landings in the preceding 90 days (for currency purposes). The FAA finds that at a minimum, the flighthour requirements in Exemption No. 11062 are appropriate to practice and build proficiency in the skills 

necessary to safely conduct the petitioner’s proposed operations. The FAA also finds that prior 

documented flight experience that was obtained in compliance with applicable regulations would satisfy 

this requirement. Training, proficiency, and experience-building flights can also be conducted under the 

grant of exemption to accomplish the required flight time. During training, proficiency, and experiencebuilding flights the PIC is required to operate the UA with appropriate distances in accordance with 14 

C.F.R 91.119. 

David Bochkay will ensure safe operations by not allowing any PIC to operate the DJI Phantom 3 

Professional UAS unless that PIC has demonstrated, by meeting minimum flight-hour and currency 

requirements, that the PIC is able to safely operate the DJI Phantom 3 Professional UAS in a manner 

consistent with the exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers and maintaining appropriate 

distances from people, vessels, vehicles and structures. 

3. Reasons Why An Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.7(a) Would Not Adversely Affect 

Safety. 

The equivalent level of safety established by Section 91.7(a) will be maintained because prior to every 

flight, David Bochkay will ensure that the DJI Phantom 3 Professional UAS is in an airworthy condition 

based upon the UAS’s compliance with its operating documents and as stated in the conditions and 

limitations herein. 

Additionally, the FAA has previously granted relief from Section 91.7(a) specific to UAS, in circumstances 

similar, in all material respects, to those presented herein (e.g. Exemption Nos. 11062, 11063, 11064, 
18

11065, 11066, 11067, 11080, 11109, 11110, 11112, 11136, 11138, 11150, 11153, 11156, 11157, 11158, 

11159, 11160, 11161). 

4. Reasons Why An Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.121 Would Not Adversely Affect 

Safety. 

The equivalent level of safety established by Section 91.121 will be maintained because the altitude 

information of the DJI Phantom 3 Professional UAS will be provided to the PIC via GPS equipment and a 

radio communications telemetry data link, which downlinks from the UA to the GCS for active monitoring 

of the flight path and altitude. This altitude information, combined with David Bochkay’ operation of the 

DJI Phantom 3 Professional UAS within visual line of sight, at or below 500 feet AGL, will ensure a level 

of safety equivalent to Section 91.121. The altitude information will be generated by GPS equipment 

installed onboard the aircraft. Prior to each flight, a zero altitude initiation point is automatically 

established by the UAS at ground level. The FAA has previously granted relief from Section 91.121 

specific to UAS, in circumstances similar, in all material respects, to those presented herein (e.g. 

Exemption Nos. 11062, 11063, 11064, 11065, 11066, 11067, 11080, 11109, 11112, 11136, 11138, 

11150, 11153, 11156, 11157, 11158, 11159, 11160, 11161). 

5. Reasons Why An Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.151(b) Would Not Adversely 

Affect Safety. 

A grant of this exemption would ensure an equivalent level of safety established by 14 C.F.R. Section 

91.151(b) as a result of (1) the technical specifications of the DJI Phantom 3 Professional UAS; (2) the 

limitations on the proposed flight operations; and (3) the location of the proposed flight operations. 

Accordingly, David Bochkay will ensure that it will safely operate the battery powered DJI Phantom 3 

Professional UAS during daylight hours in VFR conditions, with enough battery power to fly for a total 

duration of 23 minutes. 

Here, as in Exemption No. 11109, the technical specifications of the DJI Phantom 3 Professional UAS; 

the limitations on the proposed flight operations; and the location of the proposed operations, will ensure 

an equivalent level of safety established by 14 C.F.R. Section 91.151(b). Furthermore, safety will be 

ensured as the DJI Phantom 3 Professional UAS provide audible and visual warnings to the PIC at the 

GCS when the UAS experiences low battery voltage, the first warning occurring at approximately 33% 

remaining battery power, and again at approximately 10% remaining battery power. At the critically low 

battery level, the DJI Phantom 3 Professional UAS will descend and land automatically. 

Significantly, previous exemptions granted by the FAA concerning Section 91.151 establish that safety is 

not adversely affected when the technical characteristics and operating limitations of the UAS are 

considered. Relief has been granted for manned aircraft to operate at less than the minimums prescribed 

in Section 91.151, including Exemption Nos. 2689, 5745, and 10650. Moreover, the FAA has previously 

granted relief from Section 91.151 specific to UAS, in circumstances similar, in all material respects, to 

those presented herein (e.g. Exemption Nos. 8811, 10808, 10673, 11042, 11062, 11063, 11064, 11065, 

11066, 11067, 11080, 11109, 11110, 11136, 11138, 11150, 11153, 11156, 11157, 11158, 11159, 11160, 

11161). 

6. Reasons Why An Exemption From The Requirements Of Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 

91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), And 91.417(a) & (b) Would Not Adversely Affect Safety. 

In seeking this exemption, David Bochkay submits that the equivalent level of safety with regard to the 

regulatory maintenance and alteration requirements established by Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 

91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b) will be met because David Bochkay will use trained technicians 
19

to perform maintenance, alterations, or preventive maintenance on the UAS using the methods, 

techniques, and practices prescribed in the operating documents. Furthermore, David Bochkay will 

document and maintain all maintenance records for the DJI Phantom 3 Professional UAS. 

Since the DJI Phantom 3 Professional UAS will be inspected as prescribed by the operating documents, 

David Bochkay will maintain the equivalent level of safety established by Sections 91.405(a), 

91.409(a)(1), and 91.409(a)(2). A copy of the DJI Phantom 3 Professional User Manuals are attached 

hereto as Appendix A and B; a copy of the DJI Phantom 3 Professional UAS Maintenance LOG is 

attached hereto as Appendix C. 

Likewise, the exemption sought will not adversely affect safety because David Bochkay will use trained 

technicians to perform maintenance, alterations or preventive maintenance on the UAS using the 

methods, techniques, and practices prescribed by the operating documents. 

Furthermore, the exemption sought would maintain an equivalent level of safety established by Sections 

91.407, 91.417(a) and 91.417(b), because all maintenance of the DJI Phantom 3 Professional UAS will 

be performed by trained technicians. Maintenance will be documented and maintained utilizing the 

monthly maintenance log. 

Significantly, previous exemptions granted by the FAA concerning Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 

91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b) establish that safety is not adversely affected when the 

technical characteristics and operating limitations of the UAS are considered. 24 In consideration of David 

Bochkay proposed operating limitations, the operating documents, and the technical aspects of the DJI 

Phantom 3 Professional UAS, David Bochkay submits that safety will not be adversely affected by 

granting exemption from 14 C.F.R. Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1) and (a)(2), 91.409(a)(2), and 

91.417(a) and (b). The FAA has previously granted relief specific to UAS in circumstances similar, in all 

material respects, to those presented herein (e.g. Exemption Nos. 11062, 11063, 11064, 11065, 11066, 

11067, 11080, 11109, 11110, 11112, 11136, 11138, 11150, 11153, 11156, 11157, 11158, 11159, 11160, 

11161). 

7. The FAA May Prescribe Any Other Conditions For Safe Operation. 

In accordance with Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA) and 14 C.F.R. 

§ 21.16 entitled Special Conditions, David Bochkay requests that the FAA prescribe special conditions for 

the intended operation of the DJI Phantom 3 Professional UAS, which contain such safety standards that 

the Administrator finds necessary to establish a level of safety equivalent to that established by 14 C.F.R. 

Part 21, Subpart H, and 14 C.F.R §§ 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7 (a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 

91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b). Such special conditions will permit safe 

operation of the UAS for the limited purpose of conducting aerial video and photography over certain 

areas of the United States for compensation or hire. FMRA Section 333 sets forth the requirements for 

considering whether a UAS will create a hazard to users of the NAS or the public, or otherwise pose a 

threat to national security; and further, provides the authority for such UAS to operate without 

airworthiness certification in accordance with any requirements that must be established for the safe 

operation of the UAS in the NAS. 

Likewise, the Administrator may prescribe special conditions pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 21.16, for operation 

of the DJI Phantom 3 Professional UAS, since the airworthiness regulations of 14 C.F.R. Part 21 do not 

contain adequate or appropriate safety standards, due to the novel or unusual design features of the 

aircraft. Section 21.16, entitled Special Conditions, states the following: 
20

If the FAA finds that the airworthiness regulations of this subchapter do not contain adequate or 

appropriate safety standards for an aircraft, aircraft engine, or propeller because of a novel or unusual 

design feature of the aircraft, aircraft engine or propeller, he prescribes special conditions and 

amendments thereto for the product. The special conditions are issued in accordance with Part 11 of this 

chapter and contain such safety standards for the aircraft, aircraft engine or propeller as the FAA finds 

necessary to establish a level of safety equivalent to that established in the regulations. 

See 14 C.F.R. § 21.16. 

Therefore, in accordance with FMRA Section 333 and 14 C.F.R. § 21.16, the FAA may prescribe special 

conditions for David Bochkay’ intended operation of the DJI Phantom 3 Professional UAS, which contain 

such safety standards that the Administrator finds necessary to establish a level of safety equivalent to 

that established by 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H, and 14 C.F.R Sections 25 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 

91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b). 

F. A Summary That Can Be Published In The Federal Register, stating: 

The Rules From Which David Bochkay Seeks Exemption: 

David Bochkay seeks exemption from the requirements of 14 C.F.R Sections 61.113(a)&(b), 

91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b). 

A Brief Description Of The Nature Of The Exemption David Bochkay Seeks: 

This exemption will permit David Bochkay to commercially operate an Unmanned Aircraft System 

(UAS) for the purpose of conducting aerial video and photography over certain areas of the 

United States.

CONCLUSION 

As set forth herein, David Bochkay seeks an exemption pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 11.61 and Section 333 of 

the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA), which will permit safe operation of the DJI 

Phantom 3 Professional UAS commercially, without an airworthiness certificate, for the limited purpose of 

conducting aerial video and photography over certain areas of the United States. By granting this Petition, 

the FAA Administrator will be fulfilling the Congressional mandate of the FAA Modernization and Reform 

Act of 2012, while also advancing the interests of the public, by allowing David Bochkay to safely, 

efficiently, and economically operate the DJI Phantom 3 Professional UAS commercially within the NAS. 

WHEREFORE, in accordance with the Federal Aviation Regulations and the FAA Modernization and 

Reform Act of 2012, Section 333, David Bochkay respectfully requests that the Administrator grant this 

Petition for an exemption from the requirements of 14 C.F.R Sections 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 

91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b), and permit Leading Edge 

to operate the DJI Phantom 3 Professional UAS commercially for the purpose of conducting aerial video 

and photography over certain areas of the United States. 
21

Respectfully submitted, 

David Bochkay

9/9/2015
22

APPENDICES

A - Link to download DJI Phantom 3 professional User’s Manual:

http://download.djiinnovations.com/downloads/phantom_3/en/Phantom_3_Professional_User_Manual_v1.4_en.pdf