alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 6**  **310**

KAMAL PATEL , Plaintiff

– Appell ant ,

v. MACK BONNER; ABDUR RAHIM; BUREAU OF PRISONS , Defendant s – Appell ee s .

Appeal from the United States District Court fo r the East ern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. Terrence W. Boyle , District Judge. ( 5 : 08

- c t

- 0 3 1 10

- BO )

Submitted : January 19, 2011 Decided: April 11, 2011

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY , Circuit Judges.

Affirme d by un published per cur iam opinion

.

Kamal Patel , Appellant Pro Se
. David T. Huband, BUREAU OF PRISONS, Butner, North Carolina, Jennifer P. May

- Parker, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina , for Appellee s . Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent i n this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Kamal Patel appeals the district court ’ s order denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics , 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no rev ersible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Patel v. Bonner , No. 5:08

- ct

- 03110

- BO (E.D.N.C. Jan. 28, 2010) . We deny the motion to supplement the record and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal c ontentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed July 19, 2023.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D22-1425

Lower Tribunal No. F17-7060

________________

Carlos George Vila,

Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Cristina 

Miranda, Judge.

Carlos George Vila, in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Sandra Lipman, Assistant 

Attorney General, for appellee.

Before LOGUE, C.J., and FERNANDEZ and BOKOR, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### § 1202.10 Does NARA handle access to and disclosure of records of defunct agencies in the custody of NARA?

Yes, records of defunct agencies in the custody of NARA at a NARA record center are covered by the provisions of this part.
Total U.S. Exports to  Kenya

Data in Thousand Dollars 

Data For  JUN. 1999

|Group                  | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | Year to Date 6/1998 | Year to Date 6/1999 | % Change | Year Ending 6/1998 | Year Ending 6/1999 | % Change | % Share
|---------------------- | ---- | ---- | ---- | ---- | ------------------- | ------------------- | -------- | ------------------ | ------------------ | -------- | -------
|TEXTILES & APPAREL     | 737  | 858  | 895  | 3154 | 2873                | 688                 | -76.06   | 3190               | 968                | -69.64   | 0.01   
|TOTAL APPAREL          | 140  | 125  | 205  | 246  | 188                 | 158                 | -15.8    | 230                | 216                | -6.19    | 0      
|TEXTILE MILL PRODUCTS  | 597  | 732  | 691  | 2908 | 2686                | 530                 | -80.27   | 2960               | 753                | -74.58   | 0.01   
|Fabric                 | 180  | 252  | 225  | 246  | 192                 | 221                 | 15       | 292                | 275                | -5.83    | 0      
|Made-Up Arts           | 416  | 480  | 424  | 2619 | 2450                | 309                 | -87.4    | 2625               | 478                | -81.81   | 0.02   
|Cotton Broadwoven Fabs | 18   | 23   | 9    | 15   | 15                  | 138                 | 799.41   | 15                 | 138                | 799.41   | 0.01   
|Floor Coverings        | 342  | 379  | 240  | 263  | 136                 | 137                 | 0.69     | 216                | 264                | 21.95    | 0.03   
|Other Made-Up Articles | 61   | 97   | 92   | 41   | 7                   | 172                 | 2360.82  | 42                 | 206                | 385.43   | 0.03
#### § 13.1184 Other restrictions on vessels.

The superintendent will make rules for the safe and equitable use of Bartlett Cove waters and for park docks. The superintendent will notify the public of these rules by posting of a sign or a copy of them at the dock. Failure to obey a sign or posted rule is prohibited.
§ 1202.1 What does this part cover? ( a ) This part covers requests under the Privacy Act (5 U.S.C. 552a) for NARA operational records and records of defunct agencies stored in NARA record centers.
( b ) This part explains how NARA collects, uses and maintains records about you that are filed by your name or other personal identifiers and which are contained in a “system of records” as defined by 5 U.S.C. 552a(a)(5).
( c ) This part describes the procedures to gain access to and contest the contents of your records, and the conditions under which NARA discloses such records to others.
Rockingham,

No. 4849.

#### Carmen Segre *& a. v.*Donald A. Ring & *a.*

Argued June 7, 1960.

Decided July 19, 1960.

*557*Shaines & Brown (Mr. Shaines*orally), for the plaintiffs.

*Perkins, Holland & Donovan (Mr. Donovan*orally), for the defendants.

Lampron, J.

*“Mandamus*is an extraordinary remedy, granted only in cases where the usual modes of procedure and forms of remedy are powerless to afford relief.” *Carrick*v. *Langtry,*99 N. H. 251, 253. It may be resorted to only for the purpose of enforcing the performance of duties in which the public has an interest. 34 Am. Jur., Mandamus, s. 2, p. 809. It is granted only when the plaintiff has a clear and apparent legal right to the performance of the act requested. *O’Brien*v. *Fuller,*93 N. H. 221; *Maclay*v. *Fuller,*96 N. H. 326.

Viewed in the light most favorable to the plaintiffs *(Langdon*v. *Sibley,*100 N. H. 373, 375) their allegations may be summarized as follows: Plaintiffs have entered in an agreement with one Hall to purchase her buildings at Hampton Beach situated on land owned by the town of Hampton. There is a lease between Hall and the town which cannot be assigned without the approval of the latter. Plaintiffs have asked the town clerk to see the lease and were refused by order of the selectmen. Plaintiffs tried to obtain the approval of the selectmen to an assignment of the lease to them and when refused have sought the reason therefor which they did not obtain.

The lease between the town and Hall is a document of the town within the provisions of RSA 41:58. As such it “shall be open at all proper times for public inspection and examination.” *Id., s.*61. There is therefore imposed by this statute upon the town clerk or the selectmen if they are in control of this lease the clear duty to make it available to the plaintiffs or their attorney for inspection and examination at all proper times. Upon their refusal to do so, mandamus is a proper remedy to compel the performance of this public duty. *Hill*v. *Goodwin,*56 N. H. 441, 451; 55 C. J. S., Mandamus, ss. 172, 173; see *Villars*v. *Portsmouth,*100 N. H. 453. Defendants’ motion to dismiss was therefore properly denied.

*558However in the absence of knowledge of what the lease provides with respect to the right to assign, or the right of the lessor to control or prohibit assignment by the lessee (see *Machinist*v. *Koorkanian,*82 N. H. 249, 252; 51 C. J. S., Landlord and Tenant, *s.*33, *p.*540), we are unable to determine whether or not the plaintiffs are entitled to the further relief sought.

As it is agreed by the parties that the issue of proper service of the petition is not before us, the order is

*Exception overruled.*

All concurred.
§ 222.7 Cooperation in management. ( a ) *Cooperation with local livestock associations* — ( 1 ) *Authority.* The Chief, Forest Service, is authorized to recognize, cooperate with, and assist local livestock associations in the management of the livestock and range resources on a single range allotment, associated groups of allotments, or other association-controlled lands on which the members' livestock are permitted to graze.
( 2 ) *Purposes.* These associations will provide the means for the members to: ( i ) Manage their permitted livestock and the range resources.
( ii ) Meet jointly with Forest officers to discuss and formulate programs for management of their livestock and the range resources.
( iii ) Express their wishes through their designated officers or committees.
( iv ) Share costs for handling of livestock, construction and maintenance of range improvements or other accepted programs deemed needed for proper management of the permitted livestock and range resources.
( v ) Formulate association special rules needed to ensure proper resource management.
( 3 ) *Requirements for recognition.* The requirements for receiving recognition by the Forest Supervisor are: ( i ) The members of the association must constitute a majority of the grazing permittees on the range allotment or allotments involved.
( ii ) The officers of the association must be elected by a majority of the association members or of a quorum as specified by the association's constitution and bylaws.
( iii ) The officers other than the Secretary and Treasurer must be grazing permittees on the range allotment or allotments involved.
( iv ) The association's activities must be governed by a constitution and bylaws acceptable to the Forest Supervisor and approved by him.
( 4 ) *Withdrawing recognition.* The Forest Supervisor may withdraw his recognition of the association whenever: ( i ) The majority of the grazing permittees request that the association be dissolved.
( ii ) The association becomes inactive, and does not meet in annual or special meetings during a consecutive 2-year period.
( b ) *Cooperation with national, State, and county livestock organizations.* The policies and programs of national, State, and county livestock organizations give direction to, and reflect in, the practices of their members. Good working relationships with these groups is conducive to the betterment of range management on both public and private lands. The Chief, Forest Service, will endeavor to establish and maintain close working relationships with National livestock organizations who have an interest in the administration of National Forest System lands, and direct Forest officers to work cooperatively with State and county livestock organizations having similar interests.
( c ) *Interagency cooperation.* The Chief, Forest Service, will cooperate with other Federal agencies which have interest in improving range management on public and private lands.
( d ) *Cooperation with others.* The Chief, Forest Service, will cooperate with other agencies, institutions, organizations, and individuals who have interest in improvement of range management on public and private lands.
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk March 23, 2009

d0316 

# Order

March 23, 2009

138022

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 138022 COA: 288448 Gladwin CC: 08-003946-FC; GERALD HOWARD MACCOR MICK, 08-003947-FC Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the November 26, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.
#### § 1154.140 Employment.

No qualified handicapped person shall, on the basis of handicap, be subjected to discrimination in employment under any program or activity conducted by the agency. The definitions, requirements, and procedures of section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 791), as established by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in 29 CFR part 1613, shall apply to employment in federally-conducted programs or activities.
#### § 223.131 Applicability.

These regulations apply to purchasers of National Forest System timber as well as to those persons who violate the Forest Resources Conservation and Shortage Relief Act of 1990 (16 U.S.C. 620, *et seq.*). These regulations do not apply to Forest Service procurement contracts which are governed by regulations at 41 CFR 4-1.6.

[60 FR 46921, Sept. 8, 1995]
# EUR-Lex - 12006M027D - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12006M027D

**Treaty on European Union (consolidated version) - Title V - Provisions on a common foreign and security policy - Article 27 D **

*
Official Journal C 321 E , 29/12/2006 P. 0022 - 0022 Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0020 - Consolidated version *

Article 27d

Without prejudice to the powers of the Presidency and of the Commission, the Secretary-General of the Council, High Representative for the common foreign and security policy, shall in particular ensure that the European Parliament and all members of the Council are kept fully informed of the implementation of enhanced cooperation in the field of the common foreign and security policy.

--------------------------------------------------
# EUR-Lex - 12004V331 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V331

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART III — THE POLICIES AND FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - TITLE VI — THE FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - CHAPTER I — PROVISIONS GOVERNING THE INSTITUTIONS - Section 1 — The institutions - Subsection 1 — The European Parliament - Article III-331 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0150 - 0150 *

Article III-331

European laws shall lay down the regulations governing the political parties at European level referred to in Article I-46(4), and in particular the rules regarding their funding.

--------------------------------------------------
[Crim. No. 298.

Third Appellate District.

May 27, 1915.]

#### THE PEOPLE, Appellant, v. J. O. BIGELOW, Respondent.

Criminal Law—Dismissal op Indictment.—The order of dismissal of the indictment in this case is affirmed on the authority of *People*v. *Knowles,*(Grim. No. 297), *ante,*p. 498.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Tuolumne County dismissing an indictment. G. W. Nicol, Judge.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

U. 8. Webb, Attorney-General, and J. Charles Jones, Deputy Attorney-General, for Appellant.

J. C. Webster, and F. P. Otis, for Respondent.

THE COURT.

Defendant was indicted for having violated the Local Option Law. Before the indictment was found he was subpoenaed to appear as a witness before the grand jury, as in the case of *People*v. *Knowles,*(Crim. No. 297), *ante,*p. 498, this day decided. When before the grand jury the district attorney informed him of the nature of the charge against him then under investigation, to which he added: “Now, of course, the grand jury can’t require of you any testimony being you are an interested party, or compel you to testify; they can simply give you an opportunity to explain this matter away, if you wish; of course, any testimony *508you give is really considered a free and voluntary statement on your part and not compulsory, and if any testimony is given it can be used against you if it is detrimental in any manner; now, with this statement, do you wish to make a statement in connection with this matter? Mr. Bigelow: I would like to; I would be willing to.” His testimony then follows and was used in finding the indictment.

When brought to trial defendant made a motion to dismiss the indictment and discharge defendant upon the ground stated in *People*v. *Knowles*and the court granted the motion. The appeal is from this order and presents the same questions involved in *People*v. *Knowles.*If there is any substantial difference between that case and the present one it tends to ■ strengthen the view we have taken in the Knowles case and to confirm the opinion we have felt constrained to express.

The order is affirmed.

A petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on July 26, 1915, and the following opinion then rendered thereon.

THE COURT.

The application for hearing in this court after decision by the district court of appeal of the third district is denied, for the reasons stated in our opinion filed in denying such a petition in the case of *People*v. *Knowles,*(Crim. No. 297), *ante,*p. 498.
Editorial Note on Part 660
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 660 appear at 67 FR 65906, Oct. 29, 2002, 88 FR 81358, Nov. 22, 2023.

§ 660.718 Exempted fishing. ( a ) In the interest of developing an efficient and productive fishery for HMS, the Regional Administrator may issue exempted fishing permits (EFP) for the harvest of HMS that otherwise would be prohibited.
( b ) No exempted fishing for HMS may be conducted unless authorized by an EFP issued for the participating vessel in accordance with the criteria and procedures specified in 50 CFR 600.745.
# EUR-Lex - 12002E167 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 12002E167

**Treaty establishing the European Community (Nice consolidated version) - Part Three: Community policies - Title XVIII: Research and technological development - Article 167 - Article 130j - EC Treaty (Maastricht consolidated version) - **

*
Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0106 - 0106 Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0253 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0051 - Consolidated version *

Treaty establishing the European Community (Nice consolidated version)

Part Three: Community policies

Title XVIII: Research and technological development

Article 167

Article 130j - EC Treaty (Maastricht consolidated version)

Article 167

For the implementation of the multiannual framework programme the Council shall:

- determine the rules for the participation of undertakings, research centres and universities,

- lay down the rules governing the dissemination of research results.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0238

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

JOSEPH BRIAN MCELROY,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including June 23, 2023, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 15 2023

05/15/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0238
§ 1256.54 Inter- and intra-agency memoranda (subject to privilege). ( a ) In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(5), NARA may withhold information found in inter-agency or intra-agency records if that information is subject to a legally recognized privilege, including the: ( 1 ) Deliberative process privilege;
( 2 ) Attorney work product privilege; and
( 3 ) Attorney-client privilege.
( b ) The Archivist of the United States may determine that this general restriction does not apply to specific records because enough time has passed that release of the information would not result in the harm that the privilege was intended to protect or confidential attorney-client communications.
#### § 13.470 Subsistence fishing.

Fish may be taken by local rural residents for subsistence uses in park areas where subsistence uses are allowed in compliance with applicable Federal law and regulation, including the provisions of §§ 2.3 and 13.40 of this chapter. Local rural residents in park areas where subsistence uses are allowed may fish with a net, seine, trap, or spear; or use native species as bait, where permitted by applicable Federal law and regulation.

[80 FR 64344, Oct. 23, 2015]
§ 13.920 Wildlife distance conditions. ( a ) *Bears.* The following are prohibited: ( 1 ) Approaching within 300 yards of a bear; or
( 2 ) Engaging in photography within 300 yards of a bear.
( b ) *Other wildlife.* The following are prohibited: ( 1 ) Approaching within 25 yards of a moose, caribou, Dall sheep, wolf, an active raptor nest, or occupied den site; or
( 2 ) Engaging in photography within 25 yards of a moose, caribou, Dall sheep, wolf, an active raptor nest, or occupied den site.
( c ) *Prohibitions.* The prohibitions in this section do not apply to persons— ( 1 ) Within a motor vehicle or a hard sided building;
( 2 ) Within 2 yards of their motor vehicle or entrance to a hard sided building that is 25 yards or more from a bear;
( 3 ) Engaged in legal hunting or trapping activities;
( 4 ) In compliance with a written protocol approved by the Superintendent;
( 5 ) Who are otherwise directed by a park employee; or
( 6 ) In accordance with a permit from the Superintendent.
[73 FR 3186, Jan. 17, 2008]
Exhibit 13.2



SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION



(pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended
December 28, 2003 of Koninklijke Ahold N.V. (the Company) as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the Commission) on the date hereof (the Report) and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Hannu Ryöppönen, Chief Financial Officer and Member of the Corporate Executive Board of the Company, certify, that:



(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



By:

/s/ Hannu RyöppönenName: Hannu Ryöppönen Title: Chief Financial Officer and Member of the Corporate Executive Board




Date: May 6, 2004



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Koninklijke Ahold N.V. and will be retained by Koninklijke Ahold N.V. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2010181EN.01000101.xml

| 6.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 181/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 181/1

---

ERRATUM

to the Consolidated version of the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community

(

  ‘Official Journal of the European Union’ C 84 of 30 March 2010

  )

‘Official Journal of the European Union’ C 84 of 30 March 2010

(2010/C 181/01)

Page 4, in the Table of Contents, Title VI:

For:

For:

| ‘TITLE VI | Final provisions |
| --- | --- |

‘TITLE VI

Read:

Read:

| ‘TITLE VI | Provisions relating to the initial period (repealed) |
| --- | --- |

‘TITLE VI

FINAL PROVISIONS

Page 14, Article 17, paragraph 1, below point b) iv):

Please move the last subparagraph to the left (‘Member States may not, in order to meet such requirements, (...)’) so as to align it with the first subparagraph, in order to clearly indicate that it is a separate subparagraph, and not part of point (b)(iv).

Please move the last subparagraph to the left (‘Member States may not, in order to meet such requirements, (...)’) so as to align it with the first subparagraph, in order to clearly indicate that it is a separate subparagraph, and not part of point (b)(iv).

Page 31, Article 65, first paragraph:

For:

For:

‘Article 60 shall apply applications from users and to contracts between users and the Agency relating to the supply of ores, source materials or special fissile materials coming from outside the Community.’,

Read:

Read:

‘Article 60 shall apply to applications from users and to contracts between users and the Agency relating to the supply of ores, source materials or special fissile materials coming from outside the Community.’

Page 56, title VI:

For:

For:

‘TITLE VI

Articles 209 to 223

(repealed)

FINAL PROVISIONS’,

Read:

Read:

‘TITLE VI

PROVISIONS RELATING TO THE INITIAL PERIOD

(repealed)

Articles 209 to 223

(repealed)

FINAL PROVISIONS’.

---