alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EUR-Lex - 12007L/AFI/DCL/57 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12007L/AFI/DCL/57

**Treaty of Lisbon amending the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Community, signed at Lisbon, 13 December 2007 - B. Declarations concerning Protocols annexed to the Treaties - 57. Declaration by the Italian Republic on the composition of the European Parliament **

*
Official Journal 306 , 17/12/2007 P. 0269 - 0269 *

57. Declaration by the Italian Republic on the composition of the European Parliament

Italy notes that, pursuant to Article 8 A (renumbered Article 10) and Article 9 A (renumbered Article 14) of the Treaty on European Union, the European Parliament is to be composed of representatives of the Union's citizens; this representation is to be degressively proportional.

Italy likewise notes that on the basis of Article 8 (renumbered Article 9) of the Treaty on European Union and Article 17 (renumbered Article 20) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, every national of a Member State is a citizen of the Union.

Italy therefore considers that, without prejudice to the decision on the 2009/2014 legislative period, any decision adopted by the European Council, at the initiative of the European Parliament and with its consent, establishing the composition of the European Parliament, must abide by the principles laid down out in the first subparagraph of Article 9 A(2) (renumbered Article 14).

--------------------------------------------------
#### Morgan v. State.

Laws 1881, Chapt. 84, § 15, providing for the payment out of the state treasury of the costs and expenses of criminal prosecutions arising in unorganized counties, being valid when enacted, was not abrogated by the adoption of the state constitution, which prescribes a new method of making appropriations.

(Opinion filed January 7, 1899.)

Original action by James Morgan against the state to recover costs of criminal prosecutions arising in unorganized counties. Hearing on report of referee, and plaintiff’s motion for judgment thereon.

Judgment in favor of plaintiff.

*S. E.*Wright, for plaintiff.

*Goe I. Crawford,*attorney general, for defendant.

Haney, J.

It was held_ by this court, in ruling upon the demurrer to the complaint herein, that plaintiff could recover *397such items of expense incurred in criminal prosecutions arising in unorganized counties, mentioned in his complaint, as were incurred while such unorganized counties were attached to Brule county for judicial purposes. 9 S. D. 230, 68 N. W. 538. The facts necessary to an understanding of the issues involved may 'be found in the decision then rendered. After the demurrer was overruled, plaintiff obtained leave to amend his complaint, by alleging that the items of expense sued for were all incurred at times when the unorganized counties in which the criminal actions arose were attached to Brule county for judicial purposes. Defendant answered the amended complaint, and by ' consent the action was referred, to have the issues of fact determined. The action now comes on for hearing upon the report of the referee, and plaintiff’s motion for judgment thereon. It is found by the referee, and shown by the evidence, that certain prosecutions arose in certain unorganized counties attached to Brule county for judicial purposes, in which the sheriff and other officers of that county earned certain fees; that an itemized account of these costs ivas properly certified by the state’s attorney of Brule county, and examined and allowed by the circuit court, as required by Comp. Laws, § 425; that on Sept. 30, 1895, the account so certified and allowed was presented to the state auditor, who refused to allow the same, and refused to issue a warrant for the amount thereof, for the reason that there was no appropriation to pay the same. Subsequently this action was commenced. There can be no question regarding the liability of the state to pay each item found by the referee, provided the territorial law continued in force and operated as an appropriation when the expenses were incurred. In the case of Lyman Co. v. State 11 S. D. 391, 78 N. W. 17, this question *398is fully considered, and for the reasons therein announced we conclude that' plaintiff is entitled to .recover judgment for $225.20, with'interest thereon at 7 per cent, per annum from September 30, 1895, the date when plaintiff’s properly itemized, certified, and allowed claim was presented to the state auditor for payment, and refused, together with his costs and disbursements, to be - taxed by the clerk of this court. Judgment will be entered accordingly.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE AUDITED JUNE 30, 1996 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF EDG CAPITAL, INC.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                          10,517
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                10,517
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  10,517
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,954
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,563
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    10,517
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   282
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,799
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,517)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       421
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,938)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350) Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Tejas Incorporated (the
Company) hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:  (i)
    the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004
(the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and(ii)
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated:
March 31, 2005
    
    /s/ John F. GarberJohn F. GarberChief Financial Officer
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided
to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
Case 16-30037 Doc 4 Filed 09/21/16 Entered 09/21/16 10:57:27 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2
Case 16-30037 Doc 4 Filed 09/21/16 Entered 09/21/16 10:57:27 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2
§ 1250.20 What do I include in my FOIA request? In your FOIA request, which must be submitted in writing: ( a ) Describe the records you seek in sufficient detail to enable NARA staff to locate them with a reasonable amount of effort. The more information you provide, the better possibility NARA has of finding the records you are seeking. Information that will help NARA find the records includes: ( 1 ) The agencies, offices, or individuals involved;
( 2 ) The approximate date(s) when the records were created;
( 3 ) The subject, title, or description of the records sought; and
( 4 ) Author, recipient, case number, file designation, or reference number.
( b ) Include your name and full mailing address as well as phone number and email address. This information allows us to reach you faster if we have any questions about your request. It is your responsibility to keep your current mailing address up to date with the office where you have filed the FOIA request.
( c ) If you request records about yourself, you must do so in accordance with the Privacy Act and our implementing regulations at 36 CFR part 1202. This includes requirements to verify your identity (see 36 CFR 1202.40). If you request records about someone other than yourself, you may receive greater access if you submit either a notarized document signed by the other person that certifies their identity and gives their permission for you to have access, or proof that the other person is deceased (e.g., a copy of a death certificate or an obituary). NARA may, at its discretion, require you to supply additional information if necessary to verify that a particular individual has consented to disclosure of records about them.
( d ) Mark both your letter and envelope, or the subject line of your email, with the words “FOIA Request.”
( e ) Before filing your request, you may find it helpful to consult NARA's “Freedom of Information Act Reference Guide”—which is available electronically at *http://www.archives.gov/foia/foia-guide.html ,* and in paper form. For a paper copy of NARA's FOIA Guide, write to: NARA FOIA Officer (NGC); Room 3110; National Archives and Records Administration; 8601 Adelphi Road; College Park, MD 20740-6001. For additional information about the FOIA, you may refer directly to the statute at 5 U.S.C. 552 or visit *http://www.foia.gov .*
[79 FR 56504, Sept. 22, 2014, as amended at 82 FR 8902, Feb. 1, 2017]
#### § 1280.20 Smoking or using alternative smoking devices.

You may not smoke or use alternative smoking devices (electronic or vapor) inside any NARA facility (including those located on GSA or GPO property), in courtyards on NARA property, or in any outdoor area within 25 feet of any NARA facility air intake duct or doorway. Due to dangers that smoking and smoking devices present to the safety of occupants and the security of archival holdings, we have a zero-tolerance policy. You may smoke and use alternative smoking devices only in marked smoking areas outside certain NARA facilities.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7600

VIRGIL FRANKLIN RYDER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

EDWARD REILLY, Chairman, U. S. Parole Commission,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert R. Merhige, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CA-97-735-3)

Submitted: May 28, 1998 Decided: June 9, 1998

Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Virgil Franklin Ryder, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* We note that mandamus relief is not appropriate where, as

here, there are no extraordinary circumstances and there are other

means of seeking the requested relief. See In re Beard, 811 F.2d

818, 826 (4th Cir. 1987). Thus, the district court did not err in

construing Ryder's action as a habeas corpus petition rather than

a petition for writ of mandamus.

2

PER CURIAM:

Virgil Franklin Ryder appeals the district court's order dismissing without prejudice his third 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition.* We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Ryder's motion

for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal on

the reasoning of the district court. Ryder v. Reilly, No. CA-97-

735-3 (E.D. Va., Oct. 3, 1997). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
§ 1258.4 What costs make up the NARA fees? ( a ) 44 U.S.C. 2116(c) allows the NATF to recover all of its costs for providing records reproduction services to the public. The vast majority of materials that are reproduced are from the holdings of NARA, which require special handling, due to the age, condition and historical significance. Examples of special handling include the following: ( 1 ) *The placement of each record by hand on the reproduction equipment.* Many of the records are fragile and have historical uniqueness; reproduction equipment operators must take great care in handling these records. For example, each page of a document must be carefully placed by hand on the reproduction equipment, a copy made, the page removed, and the process re-started.
( 2 ) *Clarity and legibility of the reproduced records.* Older records may be handwritten and darkened from age, which requires extra time to make sure we produce copies that are as clear and legible as possible.
( 3 ) *Inability to use automatic document feeders.* Because of the requirements in paragraph (a)(1) of this section, automatic document feeders cannot be used for the duplication of paper materials. This adds time and cost to the price of copying these irreplaceable documents.
( b ) The NATF costs, at a minimum, include: ( 1 ) Salaries and benefits of the NATF staff involved in all aspects of the records reproduction process (includes, but is not limited to, compensation for full- and part-time employees, temporary appointments, overtime, awards, Civil Service Retirement Service and Federal Employees' Retirement System contributions, health benefits, life insurance benefits and Thrift Savings Plan contributions).
( 2 ) Travel and transportation (includes, but is not limited to, travel and transportation of persons, transportation of things, and contract mail service).
( 3 ) Rent, communications and utilities (includes, but is not limited to, telecommunications, equipment rental, and postage).
( 4 ) Printing and reproductions (includes, but is not limited to, commercial printing, advertising, and printing of forms).
( 5 ) Consulting and other services (includes, but is not limited to, management and professional services, contract labor, work performed in support of reproduction orders, and maintenance of equipment).
( 6 ) Payments to other agencies/funds (includes, but is not limited to, reimbursements and payments to other agencies and other funds within NARA). Specifically, the NATF “hires” the NARA custodial units to do reproduction work. In return, the NATF reimburses the custodial units for the cost of salaries and benefits.
( 7 ) Supplies and materials (includes, but is not limited to, general supplies, and materials and parts).
( 8 ) Depreciation (spreading the cost of an asset over the span of several years).
( 9 ) System upgrades/replacement (includes, but is not limited to, installation of operating equipment, software upgrades, and system changes).
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 191 (Tuesday, October 3, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 58480]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-8462]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


Clinical Science Research and Development Service Cooperative 
Studies Scientific Merit Review Board; Notice of Meeting

    The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under Public 
Law 92-463 (Federal Advisory Committee Act) that a meeting of the 
Clinical Science Research and Development Service Cooperative Studies 
Scientific Merit Review Board will be held on October 17-18, 2006, at 
the Hotel Palomar, 2121 P Street, NW., Washington, DC. On October 17, 
the session is scheduled to begin at 8:30 a.m. and end at 3 p.m. and on 
October 18, to begin at 8:30 a.m. and end at 10:30 a.m.
    The Board advises the Chief Research and Development Officer 
through the Director of the Clinical Science Research and Development 
Service on the relevance and feasibility of proposed projects and the 
scientific validity and propriety of technical details, including 
protection of human subjects.
    The session will be open to the public on October 17 from 8:30 a.m. 
to 9 a.m. for the discussion of administrative matters and the general 
status of the program. The sessions will be closed from 9 a.m. to 3 
p.m. on October 17 and will be closed the entire day on October 18, 
2006 for the Board's review of research and development applications.
    During the closed portions of the meeting, discussion and 
recommendations will include qualifications of the personnel conducting 
the studies (the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly 
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy), as well as research 
information (the premature disclosure of which would be likely to 
compromise significantly the implementation of proposed agency action 
regarding such research projects). As provided by subsection 10(d) of 
Public Law 92-463, as amended by Public Law 94-409, closing portions of 
these meetings is in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(6) and (c)(9)(B).
    Those who plan to attend should contact Dr. Grant Huang, Deputy 
Director, Cooperative Studies Program (125), Department of Veterans 
Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20420, at (202) 254-
0183.

    Dated: September 22, 2006.

    By direction of the Secretary.
E. Philip Riggin,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 06-8462 Filed 10-2-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-M
Exhibit








NINE ENERGY SERVICE, LLC
March 30, 2020
Guy Sirkes
By Hand Delivery
Dear Guy:
This letter (this “Agreement”) memorializes the agreement between you and Nine Energy Service, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Company”), that, effective as of April 1, 2020, your annualized Base Salary (as such term is defined in that certain Amended and Restated Employment Agreement by and between you and the Company, dated as of March 27, 2020 (the “Employment Agreement”)) will be reduced by 15% to $323,000, less applicable taxes and other withholdings. 
This step is a response to sustained volatility in commodity prices and the economic downturn caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. We appreciate your continued service to the Company and your continued leadership during these challenging times.
Notwithstanding the foregoing or anything to the contrary in this Agreement or the Employment Agreement, for purposes of Section 6.1(b) of the Employment Agreement, your Base Salary shall be deemed to be your Base Salary in effect immediately prior to the effective time of the reduction described in this Agreement, or $380,000 (the “Prior Salary”). 
You acknowledge and represent that you are agreeing to this future salary reduction voluntarily.  By signing below you expressly consent and agree to the reduction set forth in the first paragraph of this Agreement, and hereby waive any and all rights you may have to terminate your employment with the Company for Good Reason (as such term is defined in the Employment Agreement) as a result of the changes described in this Agreement. Except as expressly modified by this Agreement, the terms of the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect and are hereby confirmed and ratified. This Agreement shall automatically terminate and cease to be of any force or effect on the date on which your Base Salary is increased to a level that is equal to or greater than the Prior Salary.
Please sign below to you acknowledge your agreement to these terms. Executed as of the date first set forth above
	
				
	 
	 
	NINE ENERGY SERVICE, LLC.

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	/s/ Ann G. Fox

	 
	 
	Name:
	Ann G. Fox

	 
	 
	Title:
	President, Chief Executive Officer

	 
	 
	 
	 

	AGREED AND ACCEPTED:
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	/s/ Guy Sirkes
	 
	 

	Name:
	Guy Sirkes
	 
	 

	Title:
	Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-2045

MELANIE KELLEY, Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. EDWARD E. SALEEBY, JR.; DEBBIE J. FREEMAN; HARRIET E. WILMETH; CARL A. SALEEBY; LISA COHEN, a/k/a Lisa A. Kinon; GERALD MALLOY; JAMIE MURDOCK; MARVIN C. LAWSON; CHERYL TURNER HOPKINS; TURNER PADGET GRAHAM & LANEY; JOHNNY JUNIOR MITCHELL, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (4:08-cv-00639-RBH)

Submitted: November 20, 2008 Decided: November 25, 2008

Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Melanie Kelley, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Melanie Kelley appeals the district court’s order dismissing her complaint. The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2000). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised Kelley that failure to file timely objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation. Despite this warning, Kelley failed to object to the magistrate judge’s

recommendation. The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned of the consequences of noncompliance. Wright v. Collins , 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn , 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Kelley has waived appellate review by failing to timely file specific objections after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We also deny Kelley’s motion for a transcript at government expense. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### § 1235.10 What records do agencies transfer to the National Archives of the United States?

Agencies must transfer to the National Archives of the United States records that have been scheduled as permanent on an SF 115, Request for Records Disposition Authority, records that are designated as permanent in a GRS; and, when appropriate, records that are accretions to holdings (continuations of series already accessioned.)
§ 214.15 Resolution of issues prior to an appeal decision. ( a ) The Responsible Official may discuss an appeal with a party or parties to narrow issues, agree on facts, and explore opportunities to resolve one or more of the issues in dispute by means other than issuance of an appeal decision.
( b ) The Responsible Official who issued a decision under appeal may withdraw the decision, in whole or in part, during an appeal to resolve one or more issues in dispute. The Responsible Official shall notify the parties to the appeal and the Appeal Deciding Officer of the withdrawal. If the withdrawal of the decision eliminates all the issues in dispute in the appeal, the Appeal Deciding Officer shall dismiss the appeal under § 214.10.
Case 16-82291 Doc 5 Filed 09/29/16 Entered 09/29/16 09:35:20 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1