alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
31.2**
 
 Certification
of Principal Financial Officer
 
 I,
Cecelia Lowman, certify that:
 
 1)
    I
      have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Severn Bancorp,
      Inc.;
 
 2)
    Based
      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
      material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
      annual report;
 
 3)
    Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects
      the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
      registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;
 
 4)
    The
      registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
      establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
      defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we
      have:
 
 a)
    designed
      such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
      information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
      subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
      particularly during the period in which this annual report is being
      prepared;
 
 b)
    [intentionally
      omitted]
 
 c)
    evaluated
      the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures
      and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
      the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
      covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and
 
 d)
    Disclosed
      in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
      financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent
      fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
      annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
      materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial
      reporting; and;
 
 5)
    The
      registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
      most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
      committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
      equivalent function):
 
 a)
    all
      significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
      which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
      summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
      registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls;
      and
 
 b)
    any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
      controls.
 
 Date:
March 15, 2005
 
 /s/
Cecelia Lowman
 Chief
Financial Officer
# EUR-Lex - 12008M/PRO/34 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008M/PRO/34

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on European Union - PROTOCOLS - Protocol (No 34) on special arrangements for Greenland **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0320 - 0320 *

PROTOCOL (No 34)

ON SPECIAL ARRANGEMENTS FOR GREENLAND

Sole Article

1. The treatment on import into the Union of products subject to the common organisation of the market in fishery products, originating in Greenland, shall, while complying with the mechanisms of the internal market organisation, involve exemption from customs duties and charges having equivalent effect and the absence of quantitative restrictions or measures having equivalent effect if the possibilities for access to Greenland fishing zones granted to the Union pursuant to an agreement between the Union and the authority responsible for Greenland are satisfactory to the Union.

2. All measures relating to the import arrangements for such products, including those relating to the adoption of such measures, shall be adopted in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 43 of the Treaty establishing the European Union.

--------------------------------------------------
§ 1256.32 How do I request access to restricted information in donated historical materials? ( a ) At Presidential libraries and regional archives, you may write to the appropriate director at the facilities in part 1253 of this chapter. In the Washington, DC, area, you may write to the Director of Access Programs (NWC) for donated textual materials or the Director of Modern Records Programs (NWM) for donated electronic records. The mailing address for NWC and NWM is Office of Records Services—Washington, DC, 8601 Adelphi Road, College Park, MD 20740-6001.
( b ) You may request a review of documents restricted under terms of a donor's deed of gift or other legal instrument to determine whether the conditions originally requiring the closure still exist. Your request must describe each document requested so that the staff can locate it with a reasonable amount of effort. For files that NARA previously screened, you may cite the reference to the withheld document as it appears on the withdrawal sheet.
( c ) In many instances, the director or his or her designated representative will determine whether entire documents or portions of them can be opened. However, a donor or his or her representative reserves the right to determine whether the donor's materials, a series, or a document or portions of it should remain closed (*see* § 1256.36).
( d ) For classified information in donated historical materials, you may file a mandatory review request under Executive Order 12958, as amended, as described in § 1256.74.
# EUR-Lex - 12008E015 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008E015

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - PART ONE: PRINCIPLES - TITLE II: PROVISIONS HAVING GENERAL APPLICATION - Article 15 (ex Article 255 TEC) **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0054 - 0055 *

Article 15

(ex Article 255 TEC)

1. In order to promote good governance and ensure the participation of civil society, the Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies shall conduct their work as openly as possible.

2. The European Parliament shall meet in public, as shall the Council when considering and voting on a draft legislative act.

3. Any citizen of the Union, and any natural or legal person residing or having its registered office in a Member State, shall have a right of access to documents of the Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies, whatever their medium, subject to the principles and the conditions to be defined in accordance with this paragraph.

General principles and limits on grounds of public or private interest governing this right of access to documents shall be determined by the European Parliament and the Council, by means of regulations, acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure.

Each institution, body, office or agency shall ensure that its proceedings are transparent and shall elaborate in its own Rules of Procedure specific provisions regarding access to its documents, in accordance with the regulations referred to in the second subparagraph.

The Court of Justice of the European Union, the European Central Bank and the European Investment Bank shall be subject to this paragraph only when exercising their administrative tasks.

The European Parliament and the Council shall ensure publication of the documents relating to the legislative procedures under the terms laid down by the regulations referred to in the second subparagraph.

--------------------------------------------------
EXHIBIT 31.2

                            SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

I, Stephen H Durland, certify that:

1. I have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report  on Form 10-Q of  Medical  Makeover
Corporation of America;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer(s)  and I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

     a)  Designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or caused  such
disclosure  controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to
ensure that material  information  relating to ( the  registrant,  including its
consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls and
procedures   and  presented  (  in  this  report  our   conclusions   about  the
effectiveness  of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over  financial  reporting  that occurred  during the  registrant's  most recent
fiscal  quarter  (the  registrant's  ( fourth  fiscal  quarter in the case of an
annual  report)  that  has  materially  affected,  or is  reasonably  likely  to
materially affect, the registrant's  internal control over financial  reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying  officer(s) and I have disclosed,  based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,  to the
registrant's  auditors  and the audit  committee  of the  registrant's  board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a) All significant  deficiencies  and material  weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal ( control over  financial  reporting  which are reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and
     (b) Any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's  internal control over
financial reporting.



          /s/    Stephen H. Durland
        --------------------------------------
        Stephen H Durland
        Acting Chief Executive Officer

Date: May 23, 2005
Appendix C

Off-Road Compression-Ignition Engine Standards
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20463

 

 

 March 13, 2023 

Via Electronic Mail Only

GWilson@elias.law

MSchechter@elias.law 

Graham Wilson

Maxwell Schechter

Elias Law Group

10 G Street NE, Suite 600 

Washington, DC 20002 

RE: MUR 8113 

 Elissa Slotkin, Elissa Slotkin for Congress, and Janica Kyriacopoulos in her official 

 capacity as treasurer 

 

Dear Counsel: 

 This is in response to your client’s request for an extension to respond to the complaint 

filed in the above-mentioned matter we received on March 10, 2023. After considering the 

circumstances in the matter, the Office of General Counsel has decided to grant the requested 

extension. Accordingly, your client’s response is due on or before the close of business on 

April 13, 2023. 

 

 If you have any questions, please contact me at (202) 694-1519 or cela@fec.gov. 

 Sincerely, 

 Christal Dennis, Paralegal

Complaints Examination and 

Legal Administration 

MUR811300026
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

# ACTION:

 Announcement of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces the tenth meeting of the American Health Information Community Electronic Health Record Workgroup in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. No. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.).

# DATES:

October 13, 2006 from 1 p.m. to 4 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

Mary C. Switzer Building (330 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20201), Conference Room 4090 (please bring photo ID for entry to a Federal building).

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

*http://www.hhs.gov/​healthit/​ahic/​ehr_​main.html.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The workgroup discussion will include, but not be limited to, ``financial incentives'' as one critical component to electronic health records, including cost implications, maintenance and training, etc.

                    The meeting will be available via Web cast at                     *http://www.eventcenterlive.com/​cfmx/​ec/​login/​login1.cfm?​BID=​67.*

Dated: September 20, 2006.

Judith Sparrow,

Director, American Health Information Community, Office of Programs and Coordination, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology.

[FR Doc. 06-8243 Filed 9-25-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4150-24-M
# EUR-Lex - 12008E193 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008E193

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - PART THREE: UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS - TITLE XX: ENVIRONMENT - Article 193 (ex Article 176 TEC) **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0134 - 0134 *

Article 193

(ex Article 176 TEC)

The protective measures adopted pursuant to Article 192 shall not prevent any Member State from maintaining or introducing more stringent protective measures. Such measures must be compatible with the Treaties. They shall be notified to the Commission.

--------------------------------------------------
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 5525 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 5525

To allow for one-time distributions from certain transportation fringe 
                           benefit accounts.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 12, 2024

Mrs. Gillibrand (for herself and Mr. Schumer) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To allow for one-time distributions from certain transportation fringe 
                           benefit accounts.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``COVID-19 Commuter Benefits 
Distribution Act''.

SEC. 2. TREATMENT OF CERTAIN DISTRIBUTIONS FROM TRANSPORTATION FRINGE 
              BENEFIT ACCOUNTS.

    (a) In General.--In the case of any qualified payment from a 
specified transportation fringe benefit account--
            (1) such qualified payment shall be includible in the gross 
        income of the employee for the taxable year in which such 
        qualified payment is made, and
            (2) the determination of whether any other payment from 
        such account is a qualified transportation fringe for purposes 
        of section 132 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 shall be 
        determined without regard to such qualified payment.
    (b) Qualified Payment.--For purposes of this section, the term 
``qualified payment'' means a one-time payment made during the 6-month 
period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act from a 
specified transportation fringe benefit account to the employee for 
whose benefit such account is maintained but only to the extent that 
such payment does not exceed the highest balance of such account during 
the period beginning on March 13, 2020, and ending on December 31, 
2023.
    (c) Specified Transportation Fringe Benefit Account.--For purposes 
of this section, the term ``specified transportation fringe benefit 
account'' means, with respect to any employee, amounts set aside by 
such employee's employer under a compensation reduction agreement 
which--
            (1) provides for payments to such employee of amounts which 
        are excludible under section 132 of the Internal Revenue Code 
        of 1986 as a qualified transportation fringe (determined after 
        the application of subsection (a)), and
            (2) provides that unused amounts at the end of a month may 
        be carried forward to the succeeding month (subject to such 
        requirements or limitations as such agreement, the Secretary of 
        the Treasury, or the Secretary's delegate, may provide).
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 189 (Friday, September 29, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 57486]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-8364]



[[Page 57486]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Defense Science Board

AGENCY: Department of Defense.

ACTION: Notice of Advisory Committee Meetings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Science Board Task Force on Directed Energy will 
meet in closed session on November 2 and 3, 2006. The location is to be 
determined. The task force will review directed energy weapon systems 
and technology application.
    The mission of the Defense Science Board is to advise the Secretary 
of Defense and the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, 
Technology & Logistics on scientific and technical matters as they 
affect the perceived needs of the Department of Defense. At these 
meetings, the Defense Science Board Task Force will: Review all 
surface, sub-surface, air and space DE programs in the Department and 
other organizations; examine recent supporting technology advancements 
and their applications with respect to supporting military DE weapon 
system developments; as well as make recommendations on potential 
strategic advantage DE weapons can provide with regards to the delivery 
of precision effects, decreased collateral damage, limiting unintended 
effects, and decreasing post combat reconstitution costs and efforts.
    In accordance with Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act, Pub. L. No. 92-463, as amended (5 U.S.C. App. II), it has been 
determined that these Defense Science Board Task Force meetings concern 
matters listed in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1) and that, accordingly, the 
meetings will be closed to the public.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Major Chad Lominac, USAF, Defense 
Science Board, 3140 Defense Pentagon, Room 3C553, Washington, DC 20301-
3140, via e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#accfc4cddec0c9df82c0c3c1c5c2cdcfecc3dfc882c1c5c0"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="64070c05160801174a080b090d0a0507240b17004a090d08">[email protected]</span></a>, or via phone at (703) 571-
0081.

    Dated: September 25, 2006.
C.R. Choate,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 06-8364 Filed 9-28-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Merrimack,

No. 4878.

#### James F. Leonard *v.*Aranosian Oil Company, Inc.

Argued November 2, 1960.

Decided November 30, 1960.

*109
      *Francis E. Perkins*and *McLane, Carleton, Graf, Greene & Brown {Mr. Brown*orally), for the plaintiff.

*Paul A. Rinden*(by brief and orally), for the defendant.

Blandin, J.

The plaintiff claims that the “only issue in this case is whether, under the circumstances, the Trial Court’s order is 'what justice requires,’ where the attachment problem had been adjusted by agreement of counsel prior to the filing of the motion, except with respect to the final adjustment on the $17,000 held in escrow.” The defendant denies that any agreement was made and argues that the plaintiff has not sustained his “burden of proof to show that the attachment is not excessive or unreasonable” as provided by RSA 511:53 (supp).

The record discloses ample evidence upon which it could be found that the defendant originally employed Robert D. Branch to represent it and that he made the agreement as to the attachment with counsel for the plaintiff, as the latter claims. This was the view taken by the Court, which stated that where an attorney representing a party made an agreement, even though he was later discharged, “the agreement which was made should be carried out.”

There is nothing on the record to indicate that when Attorney Branch entered into the arrangement with plaintiff’s attorney, he exceeded his authority by dealing in the customary manner with matters affecting his client’s interests. The authority of an attorney is broad and includes making such an agreement as was made here. *Barry*v. *Bartis,*85 N. H. 202, 204. The confusion and highly undesirable consequences which would result were clients permitted to discharge counsel who had represented them in negotiations and thus disavow at pleasure the commitments made by them, are too plain to require delineation. In this state, agreements between attorneys have been scrupulously upheld by the court. *Burtman*v. *Butman,*94 N. H. 412, 415-116; *Couillard*v. *O’Connor,*97 N. H. 89. We see no reason to depart from this principle.

The terms of the arrangement between counsel were definite, complete and are enforceable. *Dedes*v. *Dedes,*93 N. H. 215, 217; Restatement, Contracts, *s. 32.*It was clearly findable that the agreement, involving the release of substantial sums of cash *110urgently needed by the defendant to meet outstanding commitments was advantageous to it. Counsel for the plaintiff having agreed that the value of the property held under attachment, inclusive of the $17,000 in escrow, was $47,000, the Court properly ordered that $7,000 of the $17,000 held in escrow be released to the defendant, leaving $90,000 worth of security under attachment] It follows that the defendant’s exception to the Court’s order is overruled.

What has been decided renders unnecessary consideration of whether the plaintiff has sustained the burden of showing that his attachment “is not excessive or unreasonable” under RSA 511:53.

*jExceptions overruled.*

All concurred.