alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 5392 

To prohibit discrimination based on political affiliation in granting disaster 

assistance. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 21, 2024 

Mr. LANKFORD (for himself, Mr. SCOTT of Florida, Mr. TILLIS, Mr. BUDD, 

Mr. OSSOFF, Mr. MARSHALL, and Mr. PETERS) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland 

Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To prohibit discrimination based on political affiliation in 

granting disaster assistance. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Stopping Political Dis5 crimination in Disaster Assistance Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. NONDISCRIMINATION IN DISASTER ASSISTANCE. 

7 Section 308(a) of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Re8 lief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5151(a)) 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 5392 IS

1 is amended by striking ‘‘or economic status’’ and inserting 

2 ‘‘economic status, or political affiliation’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Exhibit 31.2
 RENTECH, INC.
 Certification of Chief Financial Officer
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KA of Rentech, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    [Intentionally Omitted];4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared;
 (b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;
 (c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluations; and
 (d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and
 (b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Dated: January 28, 2009
    /s/ Dan J. CohrsDan J. CohrsChief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
#### § 14.6 In form of easement, license, or permit.

No interest granted by the regulations in this part shall give the holder thereof any estate of any kind in fee in the lands. The interest granted shall consist of an easement, license, or permit in accordance with the terms of the applicable statute; no interest shall be greater than a permit revocable at the discretion of the authorized officer unless the applicable statute provides otherwise. Unless a specific statute or regulation provides otherwise, no interest granted shall give the grantee any right whatever to take from the public lands or reservations any material, earth, or stone for construction or other purpose, but stone and earth necessarily removed from the right-of-way in the construction of a project may be used elsewhere along the same right-of-way in the construction of the same project.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                           CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT
     PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b) AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

      In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A, Amendment No. 1 of
The Meridian Resource Corporation (the "Company") for the year ended December
31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, I, Michael J. Mayell, President of the Company, certify pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

  1.  The Form 10-K/A, Amendment No. 1 fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

  2.  The information contained in the Form 10-K/A, Amendment No. 1 fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

Date: April 28, 2006

                                        /s/ Michael J. Mayell
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Michael J. Mayell
                                        President
IIA

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5292

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 30 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 12), 1994

Received

DECEMBER 1 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 12), 1994

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services

AN ACT

To amend the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act

of 1990 to extend the deadline for the submission of

nominations for the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Commission.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SUBMISSION OF NOMINATIONS FOR DEFENSE

4 BASE CLOSURE AND REALIGNMENT COMMIS5 SION.

6 Section 2902(c)(1)(B)(iii) of the Defense Base Clo7 sure and Realignment Act of 1990 (part A of title XXIX
2

•HR 5292 RFS

1 of Public Law 101–510; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note) is amended

2 by striking out ‘‘January 3, 1995’’ and inserting in lieu

3 thereof ‘‘January 4, 1995’’.

Passed the House of Representatives November 29,

1994.

Attest: DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

Clerk.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

D'VAUGHN KEITHAN KING, Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL No. 85135 

# FILED AUG 2 2 2022

BY DEPLITY CLERK ELIZABETH A. BROWN CLERK OF SUPREME COURT

.\/
This is a pro se notice of appeal from an order striking motions. Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from such an order, this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990) (explaining that court has jurisdiction only when statute or court rule provides for appeal). Accordingly, this court

ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.

Hardesty 

## A114 3 au4

, J Stiglich Herndon

cc: Hon. Egan K. Walker, District Judge D'Vaughn Keithan King Attorney General/Carson City Washoe County District Attorney Washoe District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA l0) 1947A
§ 1226.16 Does NARA ever withdraw disposition authority? ( a ) When required to ensure the preservation of Government records, or when required by an emergency, or to maintain efficiency of Government operations, NARA will withdraw disposal authorizations in approved schedules (44 U.S.C. 2909). This withdrawal may apply to particular items on agency schedules or may apply to all existing authorizations for a specified type of record in any or all agencies.
( b ) To both impose and rescind the withdrawal, NARA will notify the affected agency or agencies in writing, either by letter or NARA bulletin.
118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 5314 

AN ACT 

To designate the medical center of the Department of Veterans Affairs in Tulsa, Oklahoma, as the James Mountain Inhofe VA Medical Center. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 5314 ES

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF JAMES MOUNTAIN INHOFE 

2 VA MEDICAL CENTER. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The medical center of the De4 partment of Veterans Affairs under construction as of the 

5 date of the enactment of this Act at 440 South Houston 

6 Avenue, Tulsa, Oklahoma, shall after such date of enact7 ment be known and designated as the ‘‘James Mountain 

8 Inhofe Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center’’ 

9 or the ‘‘James Mountain Inhofe VA Medical Center’’. 

10 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in any law, regula11 tion, map, document, paper, or other record of the United 

12 States to the medical center referred to in subsection (a) 

13 shall be considered to be a reference to the James Moun14 tain Inhofe VA Medical Center. 

Passed the Senate November 13, 2024. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 5314 

AN ACT 

To designate the medical center of the Department 

James Mountain Inhofe VA Medical Center. of Veterans Affairs in Tulsa, Oklahoma, as the
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.3

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER
     PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(B) OR RULE 15D-14(B) AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of The Meridian Resource
Corporation (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Form 10-K"), I,
Lloyd V. DeLano, Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Date: March 15, 2006


                                        /s/ Lloyd V. DeLano
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Lloyd V. DeLano
                                        Chief Accounting Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of United American Healthcare Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Stephen D. Harris, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

       1.  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
           15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

       2.  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
           material respects, the financial condition and results of operation
           of the Company.

Dated September 24, 2003


                                          By: /s/ Stephen D. Harris
                                             --------------------------------
                                          Chief Financial Officer
                                          (principal financial officer)
EXHIBIT 32.1



Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of XTO Energy Inc.

(Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)



In connection with the Annual Report of XTO Energy Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Bob R. Simpson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Louis G. Baldwin, Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, each hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                      |  | 
|----------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/ BOB R. SIMPSON                                   
|Bob R. Simpson Chief Executive Officer March 15, 2004



|                                                        |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/ LOUIS G. BALDWIN                                   
|Louis G. Baldwin Chief Financial
Officer March 15, 2004
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JACQUELYNNE O. MILLER,

Appellant,

v.

TOWNE PARK NORTH CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC.,

Appellee.

No. 4D17-1498

[May 3, 2018]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, 

Martin County; Barbara W. Bronis, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

432016CA001072.

William N. Swift of William N. Swift, P.A., Palm City, for appellant.

Michael Dermody of Becker & Poliakoff, P.A., Stuart, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, GROSS and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
§ 1004.21 Speed limits. ( a ) Speed limits in the area administered by the Presidio Trust are as follows: ( 1 ) 15 miles per hour: within all school zones, campgrounds, picnic areas, parking areas, utility areas, business or residential areas, other places of public assemblage and at emergency scenes.
( 2 ) 25 miles per hour: upon sections of Presidio Trust road under repair or construction.
( 3 ) 45 miles per hour: upon all other Presidio Trust roads.
( b ) The Board may designate a different speed limit upon any Presidio Trust road when a speed limit set forth in paragraph (a) of this section is determined to be unreasonable, unsafe or inconsistent with the purposes of the Presidio Trust Act. Speed limits shall be posted by using standard traffic control devices.
( c ) Operating a vehicle at a speed in excess of the speed limit is prohibited.
( d ) An authorized person may utilize radiomicrowaves or other electrical devices to determine the speed of a vehicle on a Presidio Trust road. Signs indicating that vehicle speed is determined by the use of radiomicrowaves or other electrical devices are not required.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Great Value Storage, LLC and World Class Capital Group. LLC, and 

Natin Paul v. Princeton Capital Corporation

Appellate case number: 01-21-00284-CV

Trial court case number: 2019-18855

Trial court: 165th District Court of Harris County

On October 26, 2021, this Court issued an order temporarily granting appellants’ motion 

to stay appointment of the receiver. In the order, the Court abated the appeal and remanded for a 

hearing in the trial court for a determination by the trial court whether appellee’s interests would 

be protected by a supersedeas bond or other order under Rule 24. Rule 24.1 permits a judgment 

debtor to supersede by either filing a good and sufficient bond, making a cash deposit in lieu of 

bond, or providing alternate security ordered by the trial court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 24.1(a).

In our order, we directed the filing of a status report by November 15, 2021. On November 

15, 2021, appellant Great Value filed a letter stating that they intended to file a nominal $100 bond

and attached a declaration by their bookkeeper asserting that Great Value had a negative net worth. 

Both the receiver and appellee have filed letters asserting that the temporary stay of the order 

appointing a receiver should be lifted based on Great Value’s lack of compliance with this Court’s 

order. 

Appellant Great Value has not complied with this Court’s order to have the trial court make 

a determination concerning supersedeas. Accordingly, this Court’s order of October 26, 2021 is 

withdrawn, the abatement is lifted, the appeal is reinstated on the active docket, and the 

temporary grant of appellant’s motion for emergency relief is withdrawn and the motion for 

emergency relief is denied. This ruling does not prevent appellants from obtaining suspension of 

enforcement of the judgment by obtaining the trial court’s approval of a good and sufficient bond. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 24.1(a),(b)(2).

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: ___/s/ Peter Kelly_______

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: ___November 18, 2021_____
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-15-00092-CV

WILLIAM WINDSOR,

Appellant

v.

JOEYISALITTLEKID, ET AL,

Appellee

From the 378th District Court

Ellis County, Texas

Trial Court No. 88611

ORDER

A document entitled “Appellant’s Brief” was received from appellant, William 

M. Windsor and filed with the Court on June 25, 2015. Windsor’s brief in this matter is 

premature. Neither the clerk’s record nor the reporter’s record in this appeal have been 

filed. An appellant’s brief is not due until 30 days after the clerk’s record or the

reporter’s record is filed, whichever is later. TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6. Because it was filed 

before the clerk’s record and reporter’s record were even prepared, the “brief” does not 
Windsor v. Joeyisalittlekid Page 2

contain the necessary references to the official record to be a proper brief. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 38.1. Accordingly, the “Appellant’s Brief” is stricken. 

PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Brief stricken

Order issued and filed July 16, 2015
# EUR-Lex - 12004V028 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V028

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART I - TITLE IV — THE UNION'S INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES - CHAPTER I — THE INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK - Article I-28 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0023 - 0024 *

Article I-28

The Union Minister for Foreign Affairs

1. The European Council, acting by a qualified majority, with the agreement of the President of the Commission, shall appoint the Union Minister for Foreign Affairs. The European Council may end his or her term of office by the same procedure.

2. The Union Minister for Foreign Affairs shall conduct the Union's common foreign and security policy. He or she shall contribute by his or her proposals to the development of that policy, which he or she shall carry out as mandated by the Council. The same shall apply to the common security and defence policy.

3. The Union Minister for Foreign Affairs shall preside over the Foreign Affairs Council.

4. The Union Minister for Foreign Affairs shall be one of the Vice-Presidents of the Commission. He or she shall ensure the consistency of the Union's external action. He or she shall be responsible within the Commission for responsibilities incumbent on it in external relations and for coordinating other aspects of the Union's external action. In exercising these responsibilities within the Commission, and only for these responsibilities, the Union Minister for Foreign Affairs shall be bound by Commission procedures to the extent that this is consistent with paragraphs 2 and 3.

--------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20463

 

November 18, 2022 

 

VIA E-MAIL

JBartlett@dickinsonwright.com

Jessica B. Bartlett

Dickinson Wright PLLC

1825 Eye Street, NW, Suite 900 

Washington, DC 20006-5468 

 RE: MUR 8082 

Conservative Action Fund and Charles Gantt, Treasurer

` 

Dear Ms. Bartlett: 

This is in response to a request for an extension to respond to the complaint filed in the above 

mentioned matter we received on November 18, 2022. After considering the circumstances in this 

matter, the Office of General Counsel has granted the requested extension. Accordingly, the response 

is due on or before the close of business December 19, 2022. You may contact me if you have any 

questions at cela@fec.gov.

 Sincerely, 

 

 Kathryn Ross, Paralegal

 Complaints Examination and 

 Legal Administration 

MUR808200084
#### In the Matter of the Application of The Troy Press Company, Respondent, for a Writ of Mandamus against Elias P. Mann, as County Treasurer of Rensselaer County, Appellant.

(Submitted April 1, 1907;

decided April 9, 1907.)

Motion for re-argument denied, with ten dollars costs. (See 187 N. Y. 279.)
Exhibit 35.2

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

Chase Bank USA, National Association

First USA Credit Card Master Trust

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Chase Bank USA, National Association (the Bank), as Servicer, pursuant to the Third Amended and Restated Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as
of December 19, 2007 (as amended and supplemented from time to time, the Agreement) between the Bank, as transferor and servicer (in such capacity, the Servicer) and BNY Mellon Trust of Delaware, as trustee, does hereby
certify that:



| | 1. | The Bank is, as of the date hereof, the Servicer under the Agreement.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | A review of the Servicers activities during the calendar year ended December 31, 2013 (the Reporting Period) and of its performance under the
Agreement has been made under my supervision.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 3. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the
Reporting Period.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this certificate this 28th day of March 2014.



CHASE BANK USA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as ServicerBy:

/s/ David A. PenkrotName: David A. PenkrotTitle:   Senior Vice President