alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1001.6 Permits. ( a ) When authorized by regulations set forth in this chapter, the Executive Director may issue a permit to authorize an otherwise prohibited or restricted activity or impose a public use limit. The activity authorized by a permit shall be consistent with applicable legislation, Federal regulations and administrative policies, and based upon a determination that public health and safety, environmental or scenic values, natural or cultural resources, scientific research, implementation of management responsibilities, proper allocation and use of facilities, or the avoidance of conflict among visitor use activities will not be adversely impacted.
( b ) Except as otherwise provided, application for a permit shall be submitted to the Executive Director during normal business hours.
( c ) The public will be informed of the existence of a permit requirement in accordance with § 1001.7.
( d ) Unless otherwise provided for by the regulations in this chapter, the Executive Director shall deny a permit that has been properly applied for only upon a determination that the designated capacity for an area or facility would be exceeded; or that one or more of the factors set forth in paragraph (a) of this section would be adversely impacted. The basis for denial shall be provided to the applicant upon request.
( e ) The Executive Director shall include in a permit the terms and conditions that the Executive Director deems necessary to protect resources of the area administered by the Presidio Trust or public safety and may also include terms or conditions established pursuant to the authority of any other section of this chapter.
( f ) A compilation of those activities requiring a permit shall be maintained by the Executive Director and available to the public upon request.
( g ) The following are prohibited: ( 1 ) Engaging in an activity subject to a permit requirement imposed pursuant to this section without obtaining a permit; or
( 2 ) Violating a term or condition of a permit issued pursuant to this section.
( h ) Violating a term or condition of a permit issued pursuant to this section may also result in the suspension or revocation of the permit by the Executive Director.
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20463 

BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

In the Matter of ) 

 ) 

Protect Ohio Values PAC, et al. ) MUR 8009 

 ) 

 STATEMENT OF REASONS OF VICE CHAIR ELLEN L. WEINTRAUB 

The complaint in this matter alleged 

 illegally coordinated with J.D. Vance for Senate ) through an obscure 

but technically public blog stashed in a little-noticed corner of the internet.1

 In its response to the 

allegations, POV PAC denied that it coordinated with the Vance campaign through the blog but also 

included documents describing a different scheme to provide in-kind contributions to the campaign 

through the use of a common vendor.2

 The Commission voted to dismiss all allegations. I dissented.3 When a respondent provides the Commission with evidence of its plans to coordinate, we ought 

to at least inquire whether they followed through on those plans. 

The factual basis for the in-kind contribution scheme is straightforward and laid out explicitly in 

information provided to the Commission.4

 In its response to the complaint, POV PAC attached a 

 to 

conduct extensive polling about J.D. Vance and the Ohio Senate race as well as 

from the polling.5 According to POV PAC: 1

2

3

4

5

MUR800900276
6

Paying for services provided to a campaign is a classic in-kind contribution.7

 The Office of 

General Counsel acknowledges as much in its report: 

conduct that would constitute the provision of in-kind contributions by POV PAC to the Vance 

8

9

10

11

12

13 14

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

MUR800900277
15

16

17

Campaigns and unlimited outside spending groups have grown increasingly bold in using online 

venues to communicate valuable information in ways that allow the PACs to support the campaigns, 

making a mockery of contribution limits.18 Regulations crafted in an earlier era of the internet, before 

the advent of super PACs, have totally failed to keep up.

Date Ellen L. Weintraub

Vice Chair

15

16

17

18

May 23, 2024

MUR800900278
#### Hannah K. Gibbons, Appellant, *v.*Philip Berolzheimer, Respondent.

(Argued April 29, 1907;

decided May 10, 1907.)

*Gibbons*v. *Berolzheimer,*103 App. Div. 609, affirmed.

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered June 26, 1905, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term in an action to recover for the conversion of certain stock.

*Walter B. Raymond,*and *Rad/ph Stout*for appellant.

*M. .E. Harby*and *Sylvan Bier*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion. .

Concur : Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Vann, Werner, "Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ.
# EUR-Lex - 12008E003 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008E003

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - PART ONE: PRINCIPLES - TITLE I: CATEGORIES AND AREAS OF UNION COMPETENCE - Article 3 **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0051 - 0051 *

Article 3

1. The Union shall have exclusive competence in the following areas:

(a) customs union;

(b) the establishing of the competition rules necessary for the functioning of the internal market;

(c) monetary policy for the Member States whose currency is the euro;

(d) the conservation of marine biological resources under the common fisheries policy;

(e) common commercial policy.

2. The Union shall also have exclusive competence for the conclusion of an international agreement when its conclusion is provided for in a legislative act of the Union or is necessary to enable the Union to exercise its internal competence, or in so far as its conclusion may affect common rules or alter their scope.

--------------------------------------------------
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Salon Media Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2007, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Christopher Neimeth, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


                                        /s/ Christopher Neimeth
                                        --------------------------------
     February 12, 2008                  Christopher Neimeth
                                        Chief Executive Officer
§ 2.17 Aircraft and air delivery. ( a ) The following are prohibited: ( 1 ) Operating or using aircraft on lands or waters other than at locations designated pursuant to special regulations.
( 2 ) Where a water surface is designated pursuant to paragraph (a)(1) of this section, operating or using aircraft under power on the water within 500 feet of locations designated as swimming beaches, boat docks, piers, or ramps, except as otherwise designated.
( 3 ) Delivering or retrieving a person or object by parachute, helicopter, or other airborne means, except in emergencies involving public safety or serious property loss, or pursuant to the terms and conditions of a permit.
( b ) The provisions of this section, other than paragraph (c) of this section, shall not be applicable to official business of the Federal government, or emergency rescues in accordance with the directions of the superintendent, or to landings due to circumstances beyond the control of the operator.
( c ) ( 1 ) Except as provided in paragraph (c)(3) of this section, the owners of a downed aircraft shall remove the aircraft and all component parts thereof in accordance with procedures established by the superintendent. In establishing removal procedures, the superintendent is authorized to: ( i ) Establish a reasonable date by which aircraft removal operations must be complete;
( ii ) determine times and means of access to and from the downed aircraft; and
( iii ) specify the manner or method of removal.
( 2 ) Failure to comply with procedures and conditions established under paragraph (c)(1) of this section is prohibited.
( 3 ) The superintendent may waive the requirements of paragraph (c)(1) of this section or prohibit the removal of downed aircraft, upon a determination that: ( i ) The removal of downed aircraft would constitute an unacceptable risk to human life;
( ii ) the removal of a downed aircraft would result in extensive resource damage; or
( iii ) the removal of a downed aircraft is impracticable or impossible.
( d ) The use of aircraft shall be in accordance with regulations of the Federal Aviation Administration. Such regulations are adopted as a part of these regulations.
( e ) The operation or use of hovercraft is prohibited.
( f ) Violation of the terms and conditions of a permit issued in accordance with this section is prohibited and may result in the suspension or revocation of the permit.
# EUR-Lex - 12008E123 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008E123

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - PART THREE: UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS - TITLE VIII: ECONOMIC AND MONETARY POLICY - Chapter 1: Economic policy - Article 123 (ex Article 101 TEC) **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0099 - 0099 *

Article 123

(ex Article 101 TEC)

1. Overdraft facilities or any other type of credit facility with the European Central Bank or with the central banks of the Member States (hereinafter referred to as "national central banks") in favour of Union institutions, bodies, offices or agencies, central governments, regional, local or other public authorities, other bodies governed by public law, or public undertakings of Member States shall be prohibited, as shall the purchase directly from them by the European Central Bank or national central banks of debt instruments.

2. Paragraph 1 shall not apply to publicly owned credit institutions which, in the context of the supply of reserves by central banks, shall be given the same treatment by national central banks and the European Central Bank as private credit institutions.

--------------------------------------------------
```

[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 194 (Friday, October 6, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 59125]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-8517]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

Center for Scientific Review; Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Drug 
Discovery and Molecular Pharmacology Study Section, October 5, 2006, 8 
a.m. to October 6, 2006, 5 p.m., Wyndham City Center Hotel, 1143 New 
Hampshire Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20037 which was published in the 
Federal Register on September 15, 2006, 71 FR 54511-54512.
    The meeting will be held at the Red Lion Hotel on Fifth Avenue, 
1415 Fifth Avenue, Seattle, WA 98101. The meeting dates and time remain 
the same. The meeting is closed to the public.

    Dated: September 28, 2006.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 06-8517 Filed 10-5-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FROM THE
COMPANY'S REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE PERIOD ENDED December 28, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-28-1997
<CASH>                                           8,093
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,227
<ALLOWANCES>                                        32
<INVENTORY>                                     24,026
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                43,440
<PP&E>                                         141,722
<DEPRECIATION>                                  33,165
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 171,435
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           48,037
<BONDS>                                         66,894
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           694
<OTHER-SE>                                      33,895
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   171,435
<SALES>                                        732,639
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               744,403
<CGS>                                          598,804
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  709,406
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                35,940
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,745
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (9,688)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (346)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (9,342)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 (1,849)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (11,191)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    ( .21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    ( .21)



</TABLE>
§ 1270.42 Appealing restricted access. ( a ) If the Archivist denies a person access to a Presidential record or a reasonably segregable portion of it due to a restriction made under § 1270.40, that person may file an administrative appeal. To file an administrative appeal requesting access to Presidential records, send it to the director of the Presidential Library of the President during whose term of office the record was created, at the address listed in 36 CFR 1253.3. To file an administrative appeal requesting access to Vice Presidential records, send it to the director of the Presidential Materials Division at the address listed in 36 CFR 1253.1.
( b ) An appeal must arrive to the director within 90 calendar days from the date on the access denial letter.
( c ) Appeals must be in writing and must identify: ( 1 ) The specific records the requester is seeking; and
( 2 ) The reasons why the requester believes they should have access to the records.
( d ) The director responds to the requester in writing and within 30 working days from the date they receive the appeal. The director's response states whether or not the director is granting access to the Presidential records and the basis for that decision. The director's decision to withhold release of Presidential records is final and is not subject to judicial review.
# EUR-Lex - 12008E086 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008E086

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - PART THREE: UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS - TITLE V: AREA OF FREEDOM, SECURITY AND JUSTICE - Chapter 4: Judicial cooperation in criminal matters - Article 86 **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0082 - 0083 *

Article 86

1. In order to combat crimes affecting the financial interests of the Union, the Council, by means of regulations adopted in accordance with a special legislative procedure, may establish a European Public Prosecutor's Office from Eurojust. The Council shall act unanimously after obtaining the consent of the European Parliament.

In the absence of unanimity in the Council, a group of at least nine Member States may request that the draft regulation be referred to the European Council. In that case, the procedure in the Council shall be suspended. After discussion, and in case of a consensus, the European Council shall, within four months of this suspension, refer the draft back to the Council for adoption.

Within the same timeframe, in case of disagreement, and if at least nine Member States wish to establish enhanced cooperation on the basis of the draft regulation concerned, they shall notify the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission accordingly. In such a case, the authorisation to proceed with enhanced cooperation referred to in Article 20(2) of the Treaty on European Union and Article 329(1) of this Treaty shall be deemed to be granted and the provisions on enhanced cooperation shall apply.

2. The European Public Prosecutor's Office shall be responsible for investigating, prosecuting and bringing to judgment, where appropriate in liaison with Europol, the perpetrators of, and accomplices in, offences against the Union's financial interests, as determined by the regulation provided for in paragraph 1. It shall exercise the functions of prosecutor in the competent courts of the Member States in relation to such offences.

3. The regulations referred to in paragraph 1 shall determine the general rules applicable to the European Public Prosecutor's Office, the conditions governing the performance of its functions, the rules of procedure applicable to its activities, as well as those governing the admissibility of evidence, and the rules applicable to the judicial review of procedural measures taken by it in the performance of its functions.

4. The European Council may, at the same time or subsequently, adopt a decision amending paragraph 1 in order to extend the powers of the European Public Prosecutor's Office to include serious crime having a cross-border dimension and amending accordingly paragraph 2 as regards the perpetrators of, and accomplices in, serious crimes affecting more than one Member State. The European Council shall act unanimously after obtaining the consent of the European Parliament and after consulting the Commission.

--------------------------------------------------
Case 16-30619 Doc 38 Filed 02/12/18 Entered 02/12/18 18:05:03 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 8
Case 16-30619 Doc 38 Filed 02/12/18 Entered 02/12/18 18:05:03 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 8
Case 16-30619 Doc 38 Filed 02/12/18 Entered 02/12/18 18:05:03 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 8
Case 16-30619 Doc 38 Filed 02/12/18 Entered 02/12/18 18:05:03 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 8
Case 16-30619 Doc 38 Filed 02/12/18 Entered 02/12/18 18:05:03 Desc Main

 Document Page 5 of 8
Case 16-30619 Doc 38 Filed 02/12/18 Entered 02/12/18 18:05:03 Desc Main

 Document Page 6 of 8
Case 16-30619 Doc 38 Filed 02/12/18 Entered 02/12/18 18:05:03 Desc Main

 Document Page 7 of 8
Case 16-30619 Doc 38 Filed 02/12/18 Entered 02/12/18 18:05:03 Desc Main

 Document Page 8 of 8
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-3775

_____________________________

JEREMY JAMES HURD,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County.

Brantley S. Clark, Jr., Judge.

September 28, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, LEWIS, and RAY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Colleen D. Mullen, Assistant 

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Jason W. Rodriguez, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
 
                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
 
To the Stockholders and Board of Directors
of ITEQ, Inc:
 
   
     As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation
of our report dated February 24, 1997 related to the consolidated financial
statements of ITEQ, Inc. and subsidiaries included in this Form 10-K/A, into
ITEQ's previously filed Registration Statement File no. 333-09051 on Form S-8.
    
 
ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
 
Houston, TX
   
April 30, 1997
Exhibit 21.1
List of Subsidiaries
 State Or Other Jurisdiction Of
    
    Names Under WhichSubsidiaries Of The Registrant
    
    Incorporation Or Organization
    
    Subsidiaries Do BusinessH.A. Sheldon Canada, Ltd.
    
    Ontario, Canada
    
    1088258 Ontario, Inc.
H.A. Sheldon Canada, Ltd.TBAC Investment Trust
    
    Pennsylvania
    
    TBAC Investment TrustTandy Brands Accessories Handbags, Inc.
    
    Delaware
    
    Tandy Brands Accessories
Handbags, Inc.TBAC - Torel, Inc.
    
    Delaware
    
    TBAC - Torel, Inc.
# EUR-Lex - 12004V289 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V289

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART III — THE POLICIES AND FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - TITLE IV — ASSOCIATION OF THE OVERSEAS COUNTRIES AND TERRITORIES - Article III-289 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0131 - 0131 *

Article III-289

If the level of the duties applicable to goods from a third country on entry into a country or territory is liable, when Article III-288(1) has been applied, to cause deflections of trade to the detriment of any Member State, the latter may request the Commission to propose to the other Member States that they take the necessary measures to remedy the situation.

--------------------------------------------------
|        (1) | such      Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, fully complies with the      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of      1934; and |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|        (2) |  the      information contained in such Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,      2007, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition      and results of operations of Rural Cellular  Corporation. |
|-----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:   March 11,    2008 |  /s/      Richard P. Ekstrand         |
|------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------|
|                                     | Richard      P. Ekstrand                   |
|                                     | President      and Chief Executive Officer |

| Date:   March 11,    2008 |  /s/      Wesley E. Schultz                         |
|------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------|
|                                     | Wesley      E. Schultz                                   |
|                                     | Executive      Vice President and Chief FinancialOfficer |