alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EUR-Lex - 12004V362 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V362

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART III — THE POLICIES AND FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - TITLE VI — THE FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - CHAPTER I — PROVISIONS GOVERNING THE INSTITUTIONS - Section 1 — The institutions - Subsection 5 — The Court of Justice of the European Union - Article III-362 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0159 - 0159 *

Article III-362

1. If the Court of Justice of the European Union finds that a Member State has failed to fulfil an obligation under the Constitution, that State shall be required to take the necessary measures to comply with the judgment of the Court.

2. If the Commission considers that the Member State concerned has not taken the necessary measures to comply with the judgment referred to in paragraph 1, it may bring the case before the Court of Justice of the European Union after giving that State the opportunity to submit its observations. It shall specify the amount of the lump sum or penalty payment to be paid by the Member State concerned which it considers appropriate in the circumstances.

If the Court finds that the Member State concerned has not complied with its judgment it may impose a lump sum or penalty payment on it.

This procedure shall be without prejudice to Article III-361.

3. When the Commission brings a case before the Court of Justice of the European Union pursuant to Article III-360 on the grounds that the Member State concerned has failed to fulfil its obligation to notify measures transposing a European framework law, it may, when it deems appropriate, specify the amount of the lump sum or penalty payment to be paid by the Member State concerned which it considers appropriate in the circumstances.

If the Court finds that there is an infringement it may impose a lump sum or penalty payment on the Member State concerned not exceeding the amount specified by the Commission. The payment obligation shall take effect on the date set by the Court in its judgment.

--------------------------------------------------
# EUR-Lex - 12002E162 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 12002E162

**Treaty establishing the European Community (Nice consolidated version) - Part Three: Community policies - Title XVII: Economic and social cohesion - Article 162 - Article 130e - EC Treaty (Maastricht consolidated version) - **

*
Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0105 - 0105 Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0251 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0050 - Consolidated version *

Treaty establishing the European Community (Nice consolidated version)

Part Three: Community policies

Title XVII: Economic and social cohesion

Article 162

Article 130e - EC Treaty (Maastricht consolidated version)

Article 162

Implementing decisions relating to the European Regional Development Fund shall be taken by the Council, acting in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 251 and after consulting the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions.

With regard to the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund, Guidance Section, and the European Social Fund, Articles 37 and 148 respectively shall continue to apply.
# EUR-Lex - 12008E244 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008E244

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - PART SIX: INSTITUTIONAL AND FINANCIAL PROVISIONS - TITLE I: INSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS - Chapter 1: The institutions - Section 4: The Commission - Article 244 **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0155 - 0155 *

Article 244

In accordance with Article 17(5) of the Treaty on European Union, the Members of the Commission shall be chosen on the basis of a system of rotation established unanimously by the European Council and on the basis of the following principles:

(a) Member States shall be treated on a strictly equal footing as regards determination of the sequence of, and the time spent by, their nationals as members of the Commission; consequently, the difference between the total number of terms of office held by nationals of any given pair of Member States may never be more than one;

(b) subject to point (a), each successive Commission shall be so composed as to reflect satisfactorily the demographic and geographical range of all the Member States.

--------------------------------------------------
Exhibit



 



EXHIBIT 10.6




FIRST AMENDMENT TO EXECUTIVE SERVICES AGREEMENT


This First Amendment (the “First Amendment”) to the Executive Services Agreement between Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. (the “Company”) and BRPI Executive Consulting, LLC (“BRPI”) dated November 19th, 2018 is made and entered into this 22nd day of April 2020 (the “Effective Date”).  


WHEREAS, the Company and BRPI desire to change the payment terms of Section 3 of the Executive Services Agreement, on the terms and conditions specified in this First Amendment.


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, Section 3.1 of the Executive Services Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows:


“3.1    As full compensation for the Services rendered by BRPI pursuant to this Agreement, the Company shall pay BRPI a fee in the annual amount of $750,000, paid monthly in advance by the fifth day of each calendar month, and such other compensation as the parties determine to be reasonable and appropriate. Notwithstanding the forgoing, from June 1, 2020 through November 30, 2020, BRPI agrees that fifty percent (50%) of the amount payable each month pursuant to this Section 3.1 shall be deferred and shall be payable by the Company on the fifth calendar day of March 2021.” 


Except as set forth above, nothing in this First Amendment shall be deemed to alter, amend, or modify any other provisions of the Executive Services Agreement.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have agreed to and have executed this First Amendment on the Effective Date.


	
		
	 
	BRPI EXECUTIVE CONSULTING, LLC:

	 
	 

	By:
	/s/ Kenneth M. Young

	Name:
	Kenneth M. Young

	Title:
	Chief Executive Officer






	
		
	 
	BABCOCK & WILCOX ENTERPRISES, INC.

	 
	 

	By:
	/s/ John Dziewisz

	Name:
	John Dziewisz

	Title:
	Senior Vice President and Secretary
# EUR-Lex - 12006E/APP/01 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12006E/APP/01

**Amendments to Primary Legislation further to the Accession of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania to the European Union - I. Treaty on European Union **

*
Official Journal C 321 E , 29/12/2006 P. 0327 - 0327 *

AMENDMENTS TO PRIMARY LEGISLATION FURTHER TO THE ACCESSION OF THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA AND ROMANIA TO THE EUROPEAN UNION

Further to the entry in force of the Treaty concerning the accession of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania to the European Union, the following articles shall be amended as set out below.

I. TREATY ON EUROPEAN UNION

1. In Article 23(2), the second sentence of the third subparagraph shall be replaced by the following:

"For their adoption decisions shall require at least 255 votes in favour, cast by at least two-thirds of the members."

2. In Article 34(3), the end of the first sentence shall read:

"for their adoption acts shall require at least 255 votes in favour, cast by at least two-thirds of the members."

3. The second paragraph of Article 53 shall be replaced by the following:

"Pursuant to the Accession Treaties, the Bulgarian, Czech, Estonian, Finnish, Hungarian, Latvian, Lithuanian, Maltese, Polish, Romanian, Slovak, Slovenian and Swedish versions of this Treaty shall also be authentic."

--------------------------------------------------
# EUR-Lex - 12008E/AFI/DCL/16 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008E/AFI/DCL/16

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - DECLARATIONS annexed to the Final Act of the Intergovernmental Conference which adopted the Treaty of Lisbon, signed on 13 December 2007 - A. DECLARATIONS CONCERNING PROVISIONS OF THE TREATIES - 16. Declaration on Article 55(2) of the Treaty on European Union **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0344 - 0344 *

16. Declaration on Article 55(2) of the Treaty on European Union

The Conference considers that the possibility of producing translations of the Treaties in the languages mentioned in Article 55(2) contributes to fulfilling the objective of respecting the Union's rich cultural and linguistic diversity as set forth in the fourth subparagraph of Article 3(3). In this context, the Conference confirms the attachment of the Union to the cultural diversity of Europe and the special attention it will continue to pay to these and other languages.

The Conference recommends that those Member States wishing to avail themselves of the possibility recognised in Article 55(2) communicate to the Council, within six months from the date of the signature of the Treaty of Lisbon, the language or languages into which translations of the Treaties will be made.

--------------------------------------------------
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6495

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ERROL ANTHONY LLOYD, a/k/a Teech,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief

District Judge. (CR-96-463-A, CA-00-1176-AM)

Submitted: May 30, 2002 Decided: June 7, 2002

Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Errol Anthony Lloyd, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas More Hollenhorst,

Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Errol Anthony Lloyd seeks to appeal the district court’s

orders denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West

Supp. 2001) and his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed

the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and

dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United

States v. Lloyd, Nos. CR-96-463-A; CA-00-1176-AM (E.D. Va. Jan. 4,

2002; filed Feb. 11, 2002 & entered Feb. 12, 2002). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-41451

(Summary Calendar)

 

VERNON JACKSON,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

DEFENDANTS, Unidentified,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

(6:97-CV-556)

- - - - - - - - - -

January 7, 1999

Before JOLLY, SMITH, and WIENER, Circuit Judges:

PER CURIAM:*

Plaintiff-Appellant Vernon Jackson seeks leave to file an outof-time appeal of the district court’s dismissal, pursuant to 42

U.S.C. § 1997e(a), of his civil rights complaint for failure to

exhaust administrative remedies. We must examine the basis of our

own jurisdiction if necessary. Mosley v. Cozby, 813 F.2d 659, 660

(5th Cir. 1987). On remand from this court, the magistrate judge

confirmed that Jackson’s notice of appeal was filed more than 30

days after the entry of judgment. It is therefore untimely. As

Jackson does not contend that he did not receive timely notice of
2

entry of the final judgment, and as he did not file his request for

an out-of-time appeal until after the 30-day period expired, there

is no statutory basis for allowing him an out-of-time appeal. See

Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) and (6). Jackson’s motion for leave to

file an out-of-time appeal is DENIED, and his appeal is DISMISSED

for lack of jurisdiction. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1); Mosley, 813

F.2d at 660. Jackson’s request for appointment of counsel is

DENIED. 

MOTIONS DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED.
**Read more of the November Dispatch**
    - November Photo Contest Winner:Harris County (TX) Constable, Precinct 3
    - Director's Corner: Native American Heritage Month
    - Keeping Nightlife Safe: The Arlington Restaurant Initiative
    - New Publications from the COPS Office
    - Our IACP Recap
    - The Salt Lake City Community Connection Center: Three Teams, One Center
United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

September 1, 2011 

ERRATUM 

______________________ 

Appeal No. 2010-1546 

DELANO FARMS COMPANY, 

FOUR STAR FRUIT, INC., AND GERAWAN

FARMING, INC. 

v. 

THE CALIFORNIA TABLE GRAPE COMMISSION, 

and 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF 

AGRICULTURE, and THOMAS J. VILSACK, 

Secretary of Agriculture. 

Decided: August 24, 2011 

Precedential Opinion 

______________________ 

Please make the following change: 

Page 2, line 33, change “Plant Variety Protection Act” to 

“Plant Patent Act”.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF MARCH 31, 2000 AND THE CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE 3 MONTHS ENDING MARCH 31, 2000 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         340,469
<SECURITIES>                                   510,981
<RECEIVABLES>                                  132,494
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,046
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,020,626
<PP&E>                                         159,888
<DEPRECIATION>                                  71,655
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,157,368
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          262,851
<BONDS>                                        454,557
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           399
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,294,648
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,157,368
<SALES>                                        204,316
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               244,640
<CGS>                                           11,778
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   45,472
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,523
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (154,458)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    19,925
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (174,383)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (174,383)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.44)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.44)


</TABLE>
#### § 1238.3 What definitions apply to this part?

See § 1220.18 of this subchapter for definitions of terms used in part 1238.
United States Steel Corporation

– Keetac

Response to U. S. EPA Section 114 Request April 24, 2012
**Item 9** The BART report discusses the technical feasibl y of overfire air and induced flue gas technology . Provide all documentation, including reports and studies, to determine the technical feasibility

of overfire air and induced flue gas technology at the facility 's indurating furnaces. **Person(s): that provided information used or considered in responding to the question or were consulted in the preparation of the response:**  Stephani Campbell **Answer:** Please r efer to Minntac response to Item 9 of its I nf ormation Request.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 5559 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 5559

 To amend the Act of August 9, 1955 (commonly known as the ``Long-Term 
 Leasing Act''), to authorize leases of up to 99 years for land in the 
  Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe Reservation and land held in trust for the 
    Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head (Aquinnah), and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            December 17 (legislative day, December 16), 2024

Mr. Markey (for himself and Ms. Warren) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Act of August 9, 1955 (commonly known as the ``Long-Term 
 Leasing Act''), to authorize leases of up to 99 years for land in the 
  Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe Reservation and land held in trust for the 
    Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head (Aquinnah), and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MASHPEE WAMPANOAG TRIBE AND WAMPANOAG TRIBE OF GAY HEAD 
              (AQUINNAH) LEASING AUTHORITY.

    Subsection (a) of the first section of the Act of August 9, 1955 
(69 Stat. 539, chapter 615; 25 U.S.C. 415(a)) (commonly known as the 
``Long-Term Leasing Act''), is amended, in the second sentence, by 
inserting ``, the Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe Reservation, land held in 
trust for the Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head (Aquinnah)'' after 
``Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Reservation''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 5604 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 5604

   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand the advanced 
 manufacturing investment credit to include materials integral to the 
    manufacturing of semiconductors or semiconductor manufacturing 
                               equipment.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            December 19 (legislative day, December 16), 2024

  Mrs. Blackburn (for herself, Mr. Bennet, Mr. Tillis, and Mr. Coons) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                          Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand the advanced 
 manufacturing investment credit to include materials integral to the 
    manufacturing of semiconductors or semiconductor manufacturing 
                               equipment.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Strengthening Essential 
Manufacturing and Industrial Investment Act'' or the ``SEMI Investment 
Act''.

SEC. 2. EXPANSION OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING INVESTMENT CREDIT.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (3) of section 48D(b) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended to read as follows:
            ``(3) Advanced manufacturing facility.--The term `advanced 
        manufacturing facility' means a facility for which the primary 
        purpose is the manufacturing of--
                    ``(A) semiconductors,
                    ``(B) semiconductor manufacturing equipment, or
                    ``(C) materials primarily used for, and integral 
                to, the manufacturing of semiconductors or 
                semiconductor manufacturing equipment.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall take 
effect as if included in section 107 of the CHIPS Act of 2022 (Public 
Law 117-167).
                                 <all>
```
# EUR-Lex - 12003TN09/09 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12003TN09/09

**Act concerning the conditions of accession of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia and the Slovak Republic and the adjustments to the Treaties on which the European Union is founded - Annex IX: List referred to in Article 24 of the Act of Accession: Lithuania - 9. Energy **

*
Official Journal L 236 , 23/09/2003 P. 0842 - 0842 *

9. ENERGY

31968 L 0414: Council Directive 68/414/EEC of 20 December 1968 imposing an obligation on Member States of the EEC to maintain minimum stocks of crude oil and/or petroleum products (OJ L 308, 23.12.1968, p. 14), as last amended by:

- 31998 L 0093: Council Directive 98/93/EC of 14.12.98 (OJ L 358, 31.12.1998, p. 100).

By way of derogation from Article 1(1) of Directive 68/414/EEC, the minimum level of stocks of petroleum products shall not apply in Lithuania until 31 December 2009. Lithuania shall ensure that its minimum level of stocks of petroleum products corresponds, for each of the categories of petroleum products listed in Article 2, to at least the following number of days' average daily internal consumption as defined in Article 1(1):

- 49 days by the date of accession;

- 56 days by 31 December 2004;

- 63 days by 31 December 2005;

- 69 days by 31 December 2006;

- 76 days by 31 December 2007;

- 83 days by 31 December 2008;

- 90 days by 31 December 2009.

--------------------------------------------------
```

[House Report 106-952]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

106th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 2d Session                                                     106-952

======================================================================

 
WAIVING POINTS OF ORDER AGAINST THE CONFERENCE REPORT TO ACCOMPANY H.R. 
         4205, THE NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT, FY 2001

                                _______
                                

  October 10, 2000.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

                                _______
                                

   Mrs. Myrick, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 616]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 616, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

                summary of provisions of the resolution

    The resolution waives all points of order against the 
conference report to accompany H.R. 4205, the National Defense 
Authorization Act, FY 2001, and against its consideration. The 
rule further provides that the conference report shall be 
considered as read.

                                  

```