alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 1005.1 Advertisements.

Commercial notices or advertisements shall not be displayed, posted, or distributed within the area administered by the Presidio Trust unless prior written permission has been given by the Executive Director. Such permission may be granted only if the notice or advertisement is of goods, services, or facilities available within the area administered by the Presidio Trust and such notices and advertisements are found by the Executive Director to be desirable and necessary for the convenience and guidance of the public.
1 Daniels, Nia (FAA)

From: Daniels, Nia (FAA) Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 11:45 AM To: 'kenneth.quinn@pillsburylaw.com' Cc: Cooper, Thuy (FAA); Pappas, Rob (FAA); Scha ndler, Andrea (FAA); Pearson, Lakisha (FAA); Hoekstra, Kathlyn (FAA) Subject: Request for Additional Information

March 3, 2015

Mr. Kenneth P. Quinn Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman, LLP 1200 17 th Street, NW Washington, DC 20036-3006

Dear Mr. Quinn:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA2014-1060). This information is necessary for the Fe deral Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

 Your petition references the materials listed below, however the materials were not submitted for the record. Please provide a copy of the following referenced materials:

o Skyworks’ operating manual

o Operator’s manual

o Standard operating procedures

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any proprietary information to the FAA Hea dquarters or electronically via e-mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov . If you want us to process your request a ny further, we must receive the information described above by March 17, 2015. If we do not receiv e the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

Nia Daniels Program Analyst
Case 16-30391 Doc 4 Filed 09/23/16 Entered 09/23/16 15:48:46 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2
Case 16-30391 Doc 4 Filed 09/23/16 Entered 09/23/16 15:48:46 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-6075
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus LORI D. BLAKELY, Defendant - Appellant.
No. 04-6076
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus LORI D. BLAKELY, Defendant - Appellant. Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. (CR-95-851; CR-97-678; CA-02-4186-2-18; CA-02-4187-3-18) Submitted: June 24, 2004 Decided: June 30, 2004 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.- 2 - Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lori D. Blakely, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Rhett DeHart, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 3 - PER CURIAM: Lori D. Blakely seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying some of the claims raised in her 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders. 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order Blakely seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction and deny a certificate of appealability. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. Section 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of **Phage Genomics, Inc.** (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended **June 30, 2004** as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, **Caisey Harlingten**, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)     The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 12th day of August, 2004.

 
/s/ Caisey Harlingten 
Caisey Harlingten 
Chief Executive Officer
Case 16-24867 Doc 8 Filed 08/05/16 Entered 08/08/16 08:59:03 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
#### § 1240.61 Mandatory pasteurization for all milk and milk products in final package form intended for direct human consumption.

(a) No person shall cause to be delivered into interstate commerce or shall sell, otherwise distribute, or hold for sale or other distribution after shipment in interstate commerce any milk or milk product in final package form for direct human consumption unless the product has been pasteurized or is made from dairy ingredients (milk or milk products) that have all been pasteurized, except where alternative procedures to pasteurization are provided for by regulation, such as in [part 133 of this chapter](/on/2024-09-23/title-21/part-133) for curing of certain cheese varieties.

(b) Except as provided in [paragraphs (c)](/on/2024-09-23/title-21/section-1240.61#p-1240.61(c)) and [(d)](/on/2024-09-23/title-21/section-1240.61#p-1240.61(d)) of this section, the terms “pasteurization,” “pasteurized,” and similar terms shall mean the process of heating every particle of milk and milk product in properly designed and operated equipment to one of the temperatures given in the following table and held continuously at or above that temperature for at least the corresponding specified time:

| Temperature | Time |
| --- | --- |
| 145 °F (63 °C)1 | 30 minutes. |
| 161 °F (72 °C)1 | 15 seconds. |
| 191 °F (89 °C) | 1 second. |
| | |
| --- | --- |
| 1 If the fat content of the milk product is 10 percent or more, or if it contains added sweeteners, the specified temperature shall be increased by 5 °F (3 °C). | |

| Temperature | Time |
| --- | --- |
| 194 °F (90 °C) | 0.5 second. |
| 201 °F (94 °C) | 0.1 second. |
| 204 °F (96 °C) | 0.05 second. |
| 212 °F (100 °C) | 0.01 second. |

(c) Eggnog shall be heated to at least the following temperature and time specification:

| Temperature | Time |
| --- | --- |
| 155 °F (69 °C) | 30 minutes. |
| 175 °F (80 °C) | 25 seconds. |
| 180 °F (83 °C) | 15 seconds. |

(d) Neither paragraph (b) nor (c) of this section shall be construed as barring any other pasteurization process that has been recognized by the Food and Drug Administration to be equally efficient in the destruction of microbial organisms of public health significance.

[[52 FR 29514](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/52-FR-29514), Aug. 10, 1987, as amended at [57 FR 57344](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/57-FR-57344), Dec. 4, 1992]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Nuclear Regulatory Commission

The ACRS Subcommittee on Planning and Procedures will hold a meeting on October 3, 2006, Room T-2B1, 11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland. 

The entire meeting will be open to public attendance, with the exception of a portion that may be closed pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552b(c) (2) and (6) to discuss organizational and personnel matters that relate solely to the internal personnel rules and practices of the ACRS, and information the release of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. 

The agenda for the subject meeting shall be as follows: 

*Tuesday, October 3, 2006, 10:30 a.m. until the conclusion of business.*

The Subcommittee will discuss proposed ACRS activities and related matters. The Subcommittee will gather information, analyze relevant issues and facts, and formulate proposed positions and actions, as appropriate, for deliberation by the full Committee. 

Members of the public desiring to provide oral statements and/or written comments should notify the Designated Federal Official, Mr. Sam Duraiswamy (telephone: 301-415-7364) between 7:30 a.m. and 4 p.m. (ET) five days prior to the meeting, if possible, so that appropriate arrangements can be made. Electronic recordings will be permitted only during those portions of the meeting that are open to the public. 

Further information regarding this meeting can be obtained by contacting the Designated Federal Official between 7:30 a.m. and 4 p.m. (ET). Persons planning to attend this meeting are urged to contact the above named individual at least two working days prior to the meeting to be advised of any potential changes in the agenda. 

Dated: September 14, 2006. 

Michael R. Snodderly, 

Branch Chief, ACRS/ACNW. 

[FR Doc. 06-7889 Filed 9-20-06; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
Strafford,

No. 4951.

#### Helen M. Timmins *v.*Mathew J. Brennan, *Ex’r.*

Argued October 3, 1961.

Decided October 27, 1961.

*460*Robert A. Carignan*and *Fisher, Parsons & Moran {Mr. Moran*orally), for the plaintiff.

*Burns, Bryant & Hinchey*and *E. Paul Kelly {Mr. Kelly*orally), for the defendant.

Per curiam.

Rule 57 of the Superior Court provides that “all exceptions . . . shall be deemed waived and final judgment shall be entered” on the next or second succeeding judgment day (depending upon when the action excepted to is taken) “unless a bill of exceptions or proposed reserved case is filed before such judgment day or the court has otherwise ordered.” *Lampesis*v. *Comolli,*102 N. H. 306. The plaintiff contends that the ruling of the Trial Court denying her motion to strike the judgment of dismissal and for leave to file a reserved case should be set aside and permission granted because “ [t] here is nothing in the record to show that the Court exercised any discretion in its ruling in this matter.”

The record before us contains no transcript of the proceedings in the Trial Court at the hearing upon the motion to strike the entry of judgment, and it is undisputed that no record of the hearing was kept. The parties do not agree upon what there transpired.

The burden is upon the moving party to establish that discretion was not exercised, or if it was that it was abused. See *Dunne*v. *Carey,*97 N. H. 43, 44. The Trial Court had undoubted authority to suspend Rule 57 if justice required. *Sanborn*v. *Railroad,*76 N. H. 65; *Hall*v. *Insurance Co.,*91 N. H. 6, 8. “We find nothing to indicate that the ruling was not made in the Court’s discretion, and the presumption is that it was. *Vallee*v. *Company,*89 N. H. 285, 291; *Perkins*v. *Associates,*100 N. H. 247.” *Maryland Cas. Co.*v. *Waumbec Mills,*102 N. H. 200, 204. “It follows that so far as the record here shows, the court’s duty in determining what justice required was properly performed.” *LaMarre*v. *LaMarre,*84 N. H. 553. See also, *Pike*v. *Scribner,*101 N. H. 314, 316.

*Exception overruled.*
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 5540 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to clarify payment rules 

for manual wheelchairs under part B of the Medicare program. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 16, 2024 

Mrs. BLACKBURN (for herself and Ms. DUCKWORTH) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to clarify 

payment rules for manual wheelchairs under part B of 

the Medicare program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Choices for Increased 

5 Mobility Act of 2024’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 5540 IS

1 SEC. 2. SPECIAL RULES RELATED TO TREATMENT OF CER2 TAIN MANUAL WHEELCHAIRS UNDER THE 

3 MEDICARE PROGRAM. 

4 Section 1834(a) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

5 1395m(a)) is amended by adding at the end the following 

6 new paragraph: 

7 ‘‘(23) SPECIAL RULES RELATED TO TREAT8 MENT OF CERTAIN MANUAL WHEELCHAIRS.— 

9 ‘‘(A) REQUIREMENT TO ESTABLISH SEPA10 RATE HCPCS CODES FOR CERTAIN MANUAL

11 WHEELCHAIRS.—With respect to 

12 ultralightweight manual wheelchairs payable 

13 under this subsection furnished on or after Jan14 uary 1, 2026, the Secretary shall establish two 

15 or more HCPCS codes, as determined appro16 priate by the Secretary, for the base of such a 

17 wheelchair depending on the construction mate18 rial used in such base (with 1 or more such 

19 codes for such a base with titanium or carbon 

20 fiber construction material and 1 or more such 

21 codes for such a base without such materials). 

22 ‘‘(B) PAYMENT AND BENEFICIARY PRO23 TECTIONS.— 

24 ‘‘(i) PAYMENT.—On or after January 

25 1, 2026, in the case where an individual 

26 purchases or rents from a supplier an 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 5540 IS

1 ultralightweight manual wheelchair that 

2 has titanium or carbon fiber construction 

3 material used in the base of such wheel4 chair, payment to the supplier shall be 

5 made in the frequency and amount as 

6 would otherwise be made under this sub7 section (as described in paragraph (1)(A)) 

8 for such wheelchair. 

9 ‘‘(ii) BENEFICIARY CHARGES.—The 

10 supplier may charge the individual the dif11 ference between the payment amount de12 scribed in clause (i) for such wheelchair 

13 and the supplier’s actual charge for such 

14 wheelchair. 

15 ‘‘(iii) BENEFICIARY PROTECTIONS.— 

16 In order to inform an individual of their 

17 potential financial liability under clause 

18 (ii), the Secretary may require a supplier 

19 to issue a notice to the individual (in a 

20 form and manner determined by the Sec21 retary) prior to the purchase or rent of 

22 such ultralightweight manual wheelchair by 

23 such individual.’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors

SPSS Inc.:

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(333-133587, 333-90694, 333-87374, 333-57168, 333-45900, 333-25869, 33-73130,
33-80799, 33-73120, 333-63167, 33-74402, 333-75674, 333-108663, 333-120066, and
333-125824) on Form S-8, and the registration statements (333-133378, 333-41207,
333-21025, 333-10423, 333-30460, 333-71236, and 333-108048) on Form S-3, of our
report dated March 16, 2005, with respect to the consolidated statements of
income, comprehensive income, stockholders' equity, and cash flows of SPSS Inc.
and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2004, and the related
consolidated financial statement schedule, which report appears in the December
31, 2006 annual report on Form 10-K of SPSS Inc.

                                        /s/ KPMG LLP

Chicago, Illinois
February 26, 2007
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 180 / Monday, September 18, 2006 / Notices 54623 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Office of the Secretary 

[Transmittal No. 06–46] 

36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification 

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense 

Security Cooperation Agency. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is 

publishing the unclassified text of a 

section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. 

This is published to fulfill the 

requirements of section 155 of Public 

Law 104–164 dated 21 July 1996. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

J. Hurd, DSCA/DBO/ADM, (703) 604–

6575. 

The following is a copy of a letter to 

the Speaker of the House of 

Representatives, Transmittal 06–46 with 

attached transmittal, policy justification, 

and Sensitivity of Technology. 

C.R. Choate, 

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison 

Officer, Department of Defense. 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–M 


cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
54624 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 180 / Monday, September 18, 2006 / Notices 


cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICESEN18SE06.018</GPH>
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 180 / Monday, September 18, 2006 / Notices 54625 


cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICESEN18SE06.019</GPH>
54626 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 180 / Monday, September 18, 2006 / Notices 


cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICESEN18SE06.020</GPH>
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 180 / Monday, September 18, 2006 / Notices 54627 

[FR Doc. 06–7723 Filed 8–16–06; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–C 


cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICESEN18SE06.021</GPH>
rvruR # Ko45 r:i:FlüË tt 'r;i{E*Å!- c0ul\¡sEL

COMPLAIIIT

Submitted to: Office of General Counsel, Federal Election Commission, 1050 First Street, NE,

Washington, DC 20463

Complainant: Matthew Schonert, Eastpointe, Michigan 4802I

Alleged violators:

. Candidate: Janice Mnfrey MI 482Ig

o Committee: JANICE WINFREY FOR CONGRESS (ID: C00806125)

Statements

Janice V/infrey is a2022 candidate for U.S. Congress in Michigan's 12th District.

htþs://mielections.us/election/candlistl2D22PRI_CANDLIST.html#06012000

I personally visitêd the website http:lljaniceforcongress.com on Jily 22,2022, and observed that

it does not contain a disclaimer ("paid for by" statement). I believe that this constitutes a

violation of 11 CFR 110.11

,rky ,Eá^/ (signature)

United States of America

State of Michigan )

County of y'Lqeo.n"À ) ss

SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO before me, aNotary Public, this Ð day of

Ùr,r iy ,2022.

Notary Public

Printed Name:

Resident of: County

Acting in fl¿/(.ó141 -L County

a"'7b

My Commission Expires 4-3ò i)ot{-

MUR804500001
Evidence supporting the allegations

Following are screenshots of the website homepage which show that the page does not contain a

disclaimer. All were retrieved by the complainant on July 22,2022.

Screenshot 1/8

rffi @

toME Mgj MG Þd0m6 aæßtffi ÑMNoMCDh WmHUS

Stay ínlormed, got involved.

tu

IBMIUTN

STNSE il[MTORAT

STÂND¡NC ì^,ITT{ Y()U t

\

r

1,.: I

MUR804500002
Screenshot 218

Screenshot 3/8

rcTÉ T¡RIAüG ffi85 ENMÉIEffi ffiNMEDq ffiWTHUS

MEET JANICE

a vorcË d¡ ns;rso¡r

[s hÍqùltl0 m dEl rydhülri tuút¡rÀÞri¡Bb,mæd

¡il@ùt¡0 h lf¡ú¡¡tor rio ¿o ril¡l{ l¡ rdl n lhir sl¡m ¡d þd(

M, dd to úm ú¡d 0¡ ht6ls of It t dû6 æ at üß foøftúl 0l dlt

adall lqbbliú¡¡d F&ynddn"l¡0ffi.n¡¡damw

oodr hr¡ñrdútr¿t,rdd ld6 ü.tdldrftidq!l,r rd ¡

rdoûd d&drþ!t oilm

lhls rty lln mlcõ¿ Fud 0sml lúüE ltr l2ür f¡lcldg¿¡

C¡trEl8d0ßl túbt Yl¿ Ed a üúhd hh lbüi¡d d l¡ll4 æß 0l lw

f 6t hf dßEüEllE u@qrt cù¡Ídtg ür ¡r¡lr¿ldcûR ci srirg

dsmr4ytu¡!.

¿)^,2-Tl'þrftgt

Gndldrê fu. cong6 1 2ü DMd

i, '."¡

MUR804500003
Screenshot 4/8

uffi @

HOME MII'ÀMCE MME TWTffi WMMÐtr trIffi46

THE ISSUES

Screenshot 5/8

''JH6e! dereJeice snds on tu isÉ We æed å <ffim !êE lÉds, üd únds hhind @r .mmuñi9'

rcW WãJ^NEÊ ME MM ffiMÍM WWNU5

lii:liiìlìiii Ji iìilililtUì ì. ìl,t't 1.-tri

..j ;,t .,1Ì..ì itfi trìiii.t

íl

,t) 1':liìs lii :rIi ilirii'1i l;:l,lliìì i

r,..:r. '. -1 .1,

r! r.f. lii.:r ¡il¡ , ìr ,,' n

MUR804500004
Screenshot 6/8

Screenshot 718

I ....j ,

¡{orÉ F¡rEr rmms Effiffi ffiNym mw6

MUR804500005
Screenshot 8/8

æ/ ITI

lililmff l@

3r5-800-õ407

EI

MUR804500006
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed January 3, 2024

. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D23

- 1469 Lower Tribunal No. 23

- 3255

________________ 

### James F. Chmiel, et al. , Appellant s ,
vs. 

### NXTLVL Services, LLC, et al., Appellee s

.

An Appeal from a non - final order from the Circuit Court for Miami

Dade County, Peter R. Lopez , Judge. Black Law, P.A., and Kelsey K. Black (Fort Lauderdale), for appellant s

. Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A. , and John Cody German , Justin S. Maya and Nicholas M. Nash, II , for appellee s

.
Before EMAS, LINDSEY a nd GORDO , JJ. PER CURIAM.2 Affirmed. LPP Mortgage Ltd. v. Bank of Am., N.A. , 826 So. 2d 462, 463

– 64 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002) (“ Whether relief should be granted pursuant to Rule 1.540 is a fact specific question and the trial court ’ s ruling should not be dist urbed on appeal absent a gross abuse of discretion. ”); Somero v. Hendry Gen. Hosp. , 467 So. 2d 1103, 1106 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985) (“[W] here inaction results from clerical or secretarial error, reasonable misunderstanding, a system gone awry or any other of the foibles to which human nature is heir, then upon timely application accompanied by a reasonable and credible explanation the matter should be permitted to be heard on the merits. ”); Miami

- Dade Cnty. v. Coral Bay Section C Homeowners Ass ’ n, Inc. , 979 So. 2 d 318, 322 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008) (“ Florida has a long

- standing policy in favor of deciding lawsuits on their merits. ”); Lloyd’s Underwriter ’ s At London v. Ruby, Inc. , 801 So. 2d 138, 139 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001) (“In implementing this policy, ‘if there be any reasonable doubt in the matter [of vacating a default], it should be resolved in favor of granting the application and allowing a trial upon the merits.’” (quoting N. Shore Hosp., Inc. v. Barber , 143 So. 2d 849, 852

– 53 (Fla. 1962)).