alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 81 (Wednesday, April 28, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 22391]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-9965]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

Agency Holding the Meeting: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

Time and Date: 11 a.m., Wednesday, May 12, 2010.

Place: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

Status: Closed.

Matters To Be Considered: Rule Enforcement Review Meeting.

Contact Person for More Information: Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

Sauntia S. Warfield,
Assistant Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010-9965 Filed 4-26-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
```
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

Good Neighbor Environmental Board

March 24-25, 2011

Mandarin Oriental

1330 Maryland Avenue, S.W.

Washington, DC 20024

AGENDA

Thursday, March 24, 2011

8:30 am Registration

9:00-9:30 Welcome and Introductions

 Diane Austin, Acting Chair

 Cynthia Jones-Jackson, Acting Director, OFACMO

 Mark Joyce, GNEB Acting Designated Federal Officer

 Board Member Introductions

9:30-10:30 Opening Remarks and General Discussion

 Nancy Sutley, Chair

White House Council on Environmental Quality

10:30-10:45 Break

10:45-11:45 Air Quality and Climate Change Along the U.S.-Mexico 

Border

 Sue Stendebach, Senior Advisor on International Air 

Quality

U.S. EPA Office of Air and Radiation

 Richard Rosen, Senior Advisor for Climate Research

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

 Diana Papoulias

Research Biologist

U.S. Geological Survey

11:45-12:00 pm Public Comments
12:00-1:30 Lunch

1:30-2:30 Renewable Energy Resources in the U.S.-Mexico Border 

Region

 Edward Drusina, Commissioner

United States Section

International Boundary and Water Commission

 Edward Hoyt

Principal Clean Energy Specialist

Nexant Inc.

 DOE Speaker TBD

2:30-3:30 The Economic Potential of Renewable Energy Development in 

the Border Region

 Cecilia Aguillon, Director

Market Development and Government Relations

KYOCERA Solar, Inc.

 Stephen Niemeyer

Border Affairs Manager and Colonias Coordinator

Texas Commission on Environmental Quality

 Todd Foley, Senior Vice President on Policy and 

Government Relations

American Council on Renewable Energy

3:45-3:45 Break

3:45-4:45 Update on Border 2012 Program and Commission for

Environmental Cooperation Activities

 Michelle DePass, Assistant Administrator

U.S. EPA Office of International and Tribal Affairs

4:45- 6:00 Discussion of 14th Report

6:00 Adjourn for the Day

Friday, March 25, 2011

8:00 am Registration

8:30 Discussion of Options for June, September, and December

Meetings

9:00 Discussion of 14th Report continued
10:30 Break

10:45 Discussion of 14

th Report continued

1:30 pm Public Comments

2:00 Adjourn
§ 1211.415 Access to course offerings. ( a ) A recipient shall not provide any course or otherwise carry out any of its education program or activity separately on the basis of sex, or require or refuse participation therein by any of its students on such basis, including health, physical education, industrial, business, vocational, technical, home economics, music, and adult education courses.
( b ) ( 1 ) With respect to classes and activities in physical education at the elementary school level, the recipient shall comply fully with this section as expeditiously as possible but in no event later than one year from September 29, 2000. With respect to physical education classes and activities at the secondary and post-secondary levels, the recipient shall comply fully with this section as expeditiously as possible but in no event later than three years from September 29, 2000.
( 2 ) This section does not prohibit grouping of students in physical education classes and activities by ability as assessed by objective standards of individual performance developed and applied without regard to sex.
( 3 ) This section does not prohibit separation of students by sex within physical education classes or activities during participation in wrestling, boxing, rugby, ice hockey, football, basketball, and other sports the purpose or major activity of which involves bodily contact.
( 4 ) Where use of a single standard of measuring skill or progress in a physical education class has an adverse effect on members of one sex, the recipient shall use appropriate standards that do not have such effect.
( 5 ) Portions of classes in elementary and secondary schools, or portions of education programs or activities, that deal exclusively with human sexuality may be conducted in separate sessions for boys and girls.
( 6 ) Recipients may make requirements based on vocal range or quality that may result in a chorus or choruses of one or predominantly one sex.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 5481 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 5481

To clarify that agencies of the Department of Health and Human Services 
    do not have the authority to regulate the practice of medicine.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 11, 2024

  Mr. Johnson introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
  referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To clarify that agencies of the Department of Health and Human Services 
    do not have the authority to regulate the practice of medicine.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Right to Treat Act''.

SEC. 2. SCOPE OF AUTHORITIES.

    (a) In General.--Subject to subsection (b) and notwithstanding any 
other provision of law--
            (1) no Federal agency, including the Food and Drug 
        Administration, the National Institutes of Health, and the 
        Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, shall have the 
        authority to regulate the practice of medicine; and
            (2) no Federal law, rule, regulation, or policy shall 
        prohibit or restrict the prescription or disbursement for an 
        unapproved use of any drug that is approved by the Food and 
        Drug Administration, or that is available pursuant to section 
        561B of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 
        360bbb-0a).
    (b) Rule of Construction.--Nothing in this Act shall be construed 
to affect any Federal law, rule, regulation, or policy that restricts 
abortion, assisted suicide, euthanasia, mercy killing, coercive family 
planning, female genital mutilation, or gender transition medical 
interventions.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 1150.114 Effect of partial invalidity.

If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of these regulations is declared invalid for any reason, the remaining portions of these regulations that are severable from the invalid part shall remain in full force and effect. If a part of these regulations is invalid in one or more of its applications, the part shall remain in effect in all valid applications that are severable from the invalid applications.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Great Value Storage, LLC and World Class Capital Group. LLC, and

Natin Paul v. Princeton Capital Corporation

Appellate case number: 01

- 21

- 00284

- CV

Trial court case number: 2019

- 18855

Trial court: 165th District Court of Harris County

On October 26, 2021, this Court issued an order temporarily granting appellants’ motion to stay appointment of the receiver. In the order, the Court abated the appeal and r emanded for a hearing in the trial court for a determination by the trial court whether appellee’s interests would be protected by a supersedeas bond or other order under Rule 24. Rule 24.1 permits a judgment debtor to supersede by either filing a good an d sufficient bond, making a cash deposit in lieu of bond, or providing alternate security ordered by the trial court. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 24.1(a).

In our order, we directed the filing of a status report by November 15, 2021. On November 15, 2021, appella nt Great Value filed a letter stating that they intended to file a nominal $100 bond and attached a declaration by their bookkeeper asserting that Great Value had a negative net worth. Both the receiver and appellee have filed letters asserting that the t emporary stay of the order appointing a receiver should be lifted based on Great Value’s lack of compliance with this Court’s

order.

Appellant Great Value has not complied with this Court’s order to have the trial court make a determination concerning sup ersedeas. Accordingly, th is Court’s order of October 26, 2021 is withdrawn, th e abatement is lifted

, the appeal is reinstated on the active docket , and the temporary grant of appellant’s motion for emergency relief is withdraw n and the motion for emergency relief is denied

. This ruling does not prevent appellants from obtaining suspension of enforcement of the judgment by obtaining the trial court’s approval of a good and sufficient bond.

See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 24.1(a), (b)(2).

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature:

___

/s/ Peter Kelly

_______  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: ___ November 18, 2021

_____
#### ROSEMARY KOLBERG, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. FREDERICK KOLBERG, Jr., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division

Argued November 19, 1951

Decided November 30, 1951.

Before Judges Jacobs, Bigelow and Colie.

*Mr. Sidney S. Jaffe*argued the cause for the appellant *(Mr. William L. Brach,*attorney).

*Mr. Herman E. Dultz*argued the cause for the respondent *(Messrs. Dultz, Miller & Zeller,*attorneys).

*414The opinion of the court was delivered by

Bigelow, J. A. D.

This is a suit for divorce on the ground of extreme cruelty. After the plaintiff had completed the presentation of her evidence, the court granted defendant’s motion for judgment under *Rule*3:41-2.

The plaintiff relied on a series of acts committed by her husband which, taken separately, were none of them particularly serious but which, in cumulative effect, the plaintiff said made her life one of extreme misery and endangered her health. “I was really afraid of him because things got worse as they went on. They did not adjust themselves any better. They got worse. The slaps and punches got harder.” And when finally she left her husband: “21y face was broken out in a rash'—and my chest—and I was nervous and I didn’t sleep. When I would go to bed, I would dream the whole thing over, what had happened. * * * I knew I wasn’t right. I used to sit up on the edge of the bed most of the night.” She lost 20 pounds in weight and, after the parties separated, she regained most of it. The essentials of plaintiff’s case were corroborated. While plaintiff’s proofs were weak, we think they were sufficient to require the defendant to present his side of the controversy.

*Rule*3 :41-2 directs: “In an action tried by the court without a jury, the court as trier of the facts may then”—on defendant’s motion to dismiss at conclusion of plaintiff’s case—“determine them and render judgment against the plaintiff or may decline to render any judgment until the close of all the evidence. If the court renders judgment on the merits against the plaintiff, the court shall make findings as provided in *Rule*3 :52-l.” This language was copied into our rules from the 1946 amendment to *Federal Rule*41(6). The passage was inserted in the federal rule to make clear that upon the motion to dismiss, a judge sitting without a jury should weigh the evidence, draw such inferences as seemed to him proper, and rule accordingly. *U. S. v. U. S. Gypsum Co.,67 F. Supp.*397 (1946); reversed on another point 333 *U. S.*364; 68 *S. Ct.*525 (1948); *Moore’s Federal*
      *415
      *Practice,*41.13(4). But our own Supreme Court, without discussion, has applied to non-jury cases the rule of jury cases and holds that the motion to dismiss admits the truth of the plaintiff’s testimony, as well as every inference favorable tó plaintiff that may be legitimately drawn. *Cauco v. Galante,*6 *N. J.*128 (1951). That ruling of our highest court, we must follow.

Keversed with costs, including a counsel fee of $200, and remanded for rehearing on the evidence already presented and such additional proofs as the parties may offer.
# EUR-Lex - 12004V/PRO/06 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V/PRO/06

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - Protocols and Annexes - 6.Protocol on the location of the seats of the institutions and of certain bodies, offices, agencies and departments of the European Union **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0260 - 0260 *

6. PROTOCOL ON THE LOCATION OF THE SEATS OF THE INSTITUTIONS AND OF CERTAIN BODIES, OFFICES, AGENCIES AND DEPARTMENTS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

THE HIGH CONTRACTING PARTIES,

HAVING REGARD to Article III-432 of the Constitution,

RECALLING AND CONFIRMING the Decision of 8 April 1965, and without prejudice to the decisions concerning the seat of future institutions, bodies, offices, agencies and departments,

HAVE AGREED UPON the following provisions, which shall be annexed to the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe and to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community:

Sole article

1. The European Parliament shall have its seat in Strasbourg, where the 12 periods of monthly plenary sessions, including the budget session, shall be held. The periods of additional plenary sessions shall be held in Brussels. The committees of the European Parliament shall meet in Brussels. The General Secretariat of the European Parliament and its departments shall remain in Luxembourg.

2. The Council shall have its seat in Brussels. During the months of April, June and October, the Council shall hold its meetings in Luxembourg.

3. The Commission shall have its seat in Brussels. The departments listed in Articles 7, 8 and 9 of the Decision of 8 April 1965 shall be established in Luxembourg.

4. The Court of Justice of the European Union shall have its seat in Luxembourg.

5. The European Central Bank shall have its seat in Frankfurt.

6. The Court of Auditors shall have its seat in Luxembourg.

7. The Committee of the Regions shall have its seat in Brussels.

8. The Economic and Social Committee shall have its seat in Brussels.

9. The European Investment Bank shall have its seat in Luxembourg.

10. Europol shall have its seat in The Hague.

--------------------------------------------------
§ 1256.78 How does NARA handle my mandatory review request? ( a ) You may find our procedures for mandatory review and appeals of denials in part 1260 of this chapter, Declassification of National Security Information. ( 1 ) When agencies provide declassification guidance and delegate declassification authority to the Archivist of the United States, NARA reviews for declassification and releases the requested information or those declassified portions of the request that constitute a coherent segment unless withholding is otherwise warranted under applicable law.
( 2 ) When we do not have guidance from agencies, we coordinate the declassification review with the original classifying agency or agencies under the provisions of part 1260, subchapter D of this chapter.
( b ) If we cannot identify the information you seek from the description you provide or if the volume of information you seek is so large that processing it would interfere with our capacity to serve all requesters on an equitable basis, we notify you that, unless you provide additional information or narrow the scope of your request, we cannot take further action.
§ 1251.2 To what demands does this part apply? This part applies to demands to NARA employees for factual, opinion, or expert testimony relating to agency information or for production of records in legal proceedings whether or not NARA is a named party. However, it does not apply to: ( a ) Demands upon or requests for a NARA employee to testify as to facts or events that are unrelated to his or her official duties and that are unrelated to the functions of NARA;
( b ) Demands upon or requests for a former NARA employee to testify as to matters in which the former employee was not directly or materially involved while at NARA;
( c ) Requests for the release of, or access to, records under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552, as amended; the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. 552a; the Federal Records Act, 44 U.S.C. chs. 21, 29, 31, 33; the Presidential Records Act, 44 U.S.C. ch. 22; or the Presidential Recordings and Materials Preservation Act, 44 U.S.C. 2111 note;
( d ) Demands for records or testimony in matters before the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission or the Merit Systems Protection Board; and
( e ) Congressional demands and requests for testimony or records.
# EUR-Lex - 12005SP061 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12005SP061

**Protocol concerning the conditions and arrangements for admission of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania to the European Union - PART FIVE:PROVISIONS RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THIS PROTOCOL - TITLE III:FINAL PROVISIONS - Article 61 **

*
Official Journal L 157 , 21/06/2005 P. 0045 - 0045 *

Article 61

A certified copy of the international agreements deposited in the archives of the General Secretariat of the Council of the European Union shall be remitted to the Governments of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania by the Secretary General.

--------------------------------------------------
# Science and Engineering State Profiles

State Profiles is an interactive website providing access to state-level data on science and engineering (S&E) personnel and finances and state rankings. State Profiles displays up to 7 state profiles of the user’s choice. Data are available from surveys sponsored by the National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics within the National Science Foundation on employed S&E doctorate holders; S&E doctorates awarded, including by major S&E fields; S&E graduate students and postdoctorates; federal research and development obligations by agency and performer; state government agency R&D expenditures; total and business R&D performance; and higher education R&D performance, including by major S&E fields. Data available from other sources include population, civilian labor force, per capita personal income, federal expenditures, patents, small business innovation research awards, and gross domestic product. All data are available for download. Data cover 2003 to present.Because of the time it takes to produce and post the Science and Engineering State Profiles data set, some source data may have been updated since these profiles were created. See the source data for the most up-to-date information.
Interactive Data ToolSESTAT
          - Profile
          - General Notes
          - Data Sources
          - Previous Profiles
          - Corrections

### Can't Find What You Are Looking For?

        -  Search NCSES  to find data and reports or browse  the Publication Index .						
        - See  permissions  for reuse of NCSES material.

Last Updated: May 2024
# AVS

Quality Management System Title: Domestic New Action Worksheet with 56 QPM# AIR-ANM-ll30-F7 Date: December 17, 2008 Revision 

### 1 

# Record ofContacts 02-010- 05'-/ 7 FDMSDock.INo.FAA-. - With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed (e.g., ATA, RAA, ALPA, etc.)?

Organization Person Contacted Date 

### ATA Joe White 10122109 Boeing Scott Maul"eeo 10122109

UNCONTROLLED COPY WHEN DOWNLOADED Check the Master List 10VerifyThat This is the Correct Revision Before Use
#### § 1211.455 Textbooks and curricular material.

Nothing in these Title IX regulations shall be interpreted as requiring or prohibiting or abridging in any way the use of particular textbooks or curricular materials.
### Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA

- 

### 2015

- 4809 Directorate Identifier: 

### 2015

- NM

- 012

- AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then ou t of the changed cell

.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection,

replacement)

Do not include on

condition costs here Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine,

propeller, appliance)

Work

- hours

(include

access, testing,

and close

- up) Labor

cost

(@$8 5 / h

our) Parts Cost Total Costs

(labor +

parts) Number of

U.S.

Registered

Products Total Cost

for U.S. Fleet



### Modificaiton 75.0 $ 6,375.0

0 $0 $ 6,375.00 

### 24 $ 153,000.00

0.0 $ 0.00 $0 $ 0 .00 0 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0. 00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00



### The known number of products in compliance:

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $ 153,000



### Costs covered under warranty ( if known ) $

On

- Condition Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection,

replacement) Work

- hours

(include access,

testing, and close

up) L abor cost

(@$85/hour) Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00



### Special considerations for E conomic Analysis ( Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs) 

### :

### Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “s ignificant regulatory action”?

YES * NO

* Explanation:

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES * NO

* Explanation:

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? E xplain for

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO

Exp lanation:

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES * NO



### * Explanation 

### :