alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Argued and submitted August 4, 1993,

affirmed May 4, 1994

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Appellant, v.*REX FRANK MILLER, *Respondent.*

(C920824CR, C920825CR, C920826CR; CA A76761 (Control), A76762, A76763)

(Cases Consolidated)

874 P2d 107

Timothy A. Sylwester, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.

Timothy M. Bowman argued the cause for respondent:

Before Deits, Presiding Judge, and Richardson, Chief Judge, and Haselton, Judge.*

PER CURIAM

*

 Haselton, J., *vice*Durham, J.

*744PER CURIAM

The state appeals the trial court’s order granting defendant’s demurrer to three indictments. The state argues that the trial court erred in concluding that prosecution of the alleged crimes was time barred, because the state did not allege in the indictments that the victim had not reported the crime more than six years earlier and that, in any event, retroactive application of the 1991 amendments to ORS 131.125 would violate *the ex post facto*provisions of the state and federal constitutions. We affirm.

We need not, however, address the state’s arguments on appeal because, in our recent decision in *State v. Cookman,*127 Or App 283, 873 P2d 335 (1994), we held that the revival of a time barred prosecution under ORS 131.125, as amended, violates the principles of fundamental fairness embodied in the Due Process Clause of the United States Constitution. Accordingly, even if the state is correct that the retroactive application of the 1991 amendments to ORS 131.125 does not violate the *ex post facto*provisions of the state and federal constitutions, it would serve no purpose to remand this case to the trial court. Because the state concedes that the crimes alleged in the indictments were time barred before the effective date of the 1991 amendments to ORS 131.125, under our holding in *Cookman,*prosecution of these crimes cannot be revived.

Affirmed.
§ 1008.16 Requests for notification of existence of records and for access to records: Appeals. ( a ) *Right of appeal.* Except for appeals pertaining to records under the jurisdiction of another agency, individuals who have been notified that they are not entitled to notification of whether a system of records contains records pertaining to them or have been denied access, in whole or part, to a requested record may appeal to the Executive Director.
( b ) *Time for appeal.* ( 1 ) An appeal must be received by the Executive Director no later than 20 working days after the date of the initial decision on a request.
( 2 ) The Executive Director may, for good cause shown, extend the time for submission of an appeal if a written request for additional time is received within 20 working days of the date of the initial decision on the request.
( c ) *Form of appeal.* ( 1 ) An appeal shall be in writing and shall attach copies of the initial request and the decision on the request.
( 2 ) The appeal shall contain a brief statement of the reasons why the appellant believes the decision on the initial request to have been in error.
( 3 ) The appeal shall be addressed to the Executive Director, The Presidio Trust, P.O. Box 29052, San Francisco, CA 94129-0052.
( d ) *Action on appeals.* ( 1 ) Appeals from decisions on initial requests made pursuant to §§ 1008.11 and 1008.14 shall be decided for the Presidio Trust by the Executive Director after consultation with the General Counsel.
( 2 ) The decision on an appeal shall be in writing and shall state the basis for the decision.
#### § 1213.18 No judicial review or enforceable rights.

We intend this part to improve our internal management. As a result, it is for the use of NARA personnel only and we do not intend it to, nor does it, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its agencies or other entities, its officers or employees, or any other person.
# EUR-Lex - 12008M/PRO/06 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008M/PRO/06

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on European Union - PROTOCOLS - Protocol (No 6) on the location of the seats of the institutions and of certain bodies, offices, agencies and departments of the European Union **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0265 - 0265 *

PROTOCOL (No 6)

ON THE LOCATION OF THE SEATS OF THE INSTITUTIONS AND OF CERTAIN BODIES, OFFICES, AGENCIES AND DEPARTMENTS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

THE REPRESENTATIVES OF THE GOVERNMENTS OF THE MEMBER STATES,

HAVING REGARD to Article 341 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and Article 189 of the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community,

RECALLING AND CONFIRMING the Decision of 8 April 1965, and without prejudice to the decisions concerning the seat of future institutions, bodies, offices, agencies and departments,

HAVE AGREED UPON the following provisions, which shall be annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community:

Sole Article

(a) The European Parliament shall have its seat in Strasbourg where the 12 periods of monthly plenary sessions, including the budget session, shall be held. The periods of additional plenary sessions shall be held in Brussels. The committees of the European Parliament shall meet in Brussels. The General Secretariat of the European Parliament and its departments shall remain in Luxembourg.

(b) The Council shall have its seat in Brussels. During the months of April, June and October, the Council shall hold its meetings in Luxembourg.

(c) The Commission shall have its seat in Brussels. The departments listed in Articles 7, 8 and 9 of the Decision of 8 April 1965 shall be established in Luxembourg.

(d) The Court of Justice of the European Union shall have its seat in Luxembourg.

(e) The Court of Auditors shall have its seat in Luxembourg.

(f) The Economic and Social Committee shall have its seat in Brussels.

(g) The Committee of the Regions shall have its seat in Brussels.

(h) The European Investment Bank shall have its seat in Luxembourg.

(i) The European Central Bank shall have its seat in Frankfurt.

(j) The European Police Office (Europol) shall have its seat in The Hague.

--------------------------------------------------
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         122,487
<SECURITIES>                                       688
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,649<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0<F5>
<INVENTORY>                                     13,615
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               171,165
<PP&E>                                          63,287<F2>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0<F5>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 290,223
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           55,555
<BONDS>                                        284,339
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0<F5>
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           290
<OTHER-SE>                                    (49,961)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   290,223
<SALES>                                              0<F3>
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                68,048
<CGS>                                                0<F3>
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   52,136
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                72,434
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0<F5>
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              37,476
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (83,723)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0<F4>
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (83,723)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0<F5>
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0<F5>
<CHANGES>                                            0<F5>
<NET-INCOME>                                  (83,723)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (3.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (3.00)
<FN>
<F1>Net of allowance for doubtful accounts.
<F5>Not applicable
<F2>Net of accumulated depreciation.
<F3>Winstar Global Product sales (health & beauty aids) are grouped with "total
revenue".
<F4>Taxes reported on income statement are primarily based on capital, and are
included on this line.
</FN>


</TABLE>
Case 16-82079 Doc 1-1 Filed 08/31/16 Entered 08/31/16 23:21:30 Desc 

 Signature Pages Page 1 of 6
Case 16-82079 Doc 1-1 Filed 08/31/16 Entered 08/31/16 23:21:30 Desc 

 Signature Pages Page 2 of 6
Case 16-82079 Doc 1-1 Filed 08/31/16 Entered 08/31/16 23:21:30 Desc 

 Signature Pages Page 3 of 6
Case 16-82079 Doc 1-1 Filed 08/31/16 Entered 08/31/16 23:21:30 Desc 

 Signature Pages Page 4 of 6
Case 16-82079 Doc 1-1 Filed 08/31/16 Entered 08/31/16 23:21:30 Desc 

 Signature Pages Page 5 of 6
Case 16-82079 Doc 1-1 Filed 08/31/16 Entered 08/31/16 23:21:30 Desc 

 Signature Pages Page 6 of 6
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION UNDER EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-14 OR 15d-14**I, Kurt J. Rechner, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 ofTejas Incorporated;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: March 30, 2007                                                     /s/ Kurt J. Rechner   Kurt J. Rechner   Chief Financial Officer
Document

Exhibit 10.5

			
	COMPASS MINERALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
2020 INCENTIVE AWARD PLAN




STOCK OPTION GRANT NOTICE


Compass Minerals International, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), hereby grants to the participant listed below (the “Participant”) the stock options (the “Options”) described in this Stock Option Grant Notice (this “Grant Notice”), subject to the Compass Minerals International, Inc. 2020 Incentive Award Plan (as amended from time to time, the “Plan”) and the Rules, Policies and Procedures for Equity Awards Granted to Employees, effective as of May 15, 2020 (the “Rules”), each of which is incorporated into this Grant Notice by reference. Capitalized terms not specifically defined in this Grant Notice have the meanings specified in the Plan or the Rules, as applicable. In addition, the Options are subject to the Company’s Compensation Clawback Policy, dated February 2016 and any successor policy thereto (the “Clawback Policy). This Grant Notice will constitute an “Award Agreement” under the terms of the Plan. 
						
	Participant:	_______________________
	Grant Date:	_______________________
	Exercise Price per Share:	_______________________
	Shares Subject to the Options:	_______________________
	Final Expiration Date:	_______________________
	Vesting Commencement Date:	Same date as Grant Date
	Vesting Schedule:	Subject to the Rules, the Options will vest and become exercisable [to be specified in individual grant notices]
	Type of Option:	Non-Qualified Stock Option


By Participant’s signature below, Participant agrees to be bound by the terms of this Grant Notice, the Plan, the Clawback Policy and the Rules.  Participant has reviewed the Plan, this Grant Notice, the Clawback Policy and the Rules in their entirety, has had an opportunity to obtain the advice of counsel prior to executing this Grant Notice and fully understands all provisions of the Plan, this Grant Notice, the Clawback Policy and the Rules.  If there is any conflict between the terms and conditions of this Grant Notice and the Rules, the Rules will control. Participant hereby agrees to accept as binding, conclusive and final all decisions or interpretations of the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors upon any questions arising under this Grant Notice, the Plan, the Clawback Policy and the Rules.  




												
	COMPASS MINERALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.			PARTICIPANT
	By:			
	Name:			Participant Name:
	Title:
### -82 -80 -78 -76 -74

36 38 40 

## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 

### 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 08/24 

## NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

# Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 24 Aug 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.44 N 77.04 WMeters AGL 

## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■


## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■ 

## ★ ● ● ●



## ★ ● ● ● ●
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsIndependent Orbiter Assessment (IOA): Assessment of the extravehicular mobility unit, volume 1The results of the Independent Orbiter Assessment (IOA) of the Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) and Critical Items List (CIL) are presented. The IOA effort performed an independent analysis of the Extravehicular Mobility Unit (EMU) hardware and system, generating draft failure modes criticalities and potential critical items. To preserve independence, this analysis was accomplished without reliance upon the results contained within the NASA FMEA/CIL documentation. The IOA results were than compared to the most recent proposed Post 51-L NASA FMEA/CIL baseline. A resolution of each discrepancy from the comparison was provided through additional analysis as required. This report documents the results of that comparison for the Orbiter EMU hardware.Document ID19900001634Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsRaffaelli, Gary G.*(McDonnell-Douglas Astronautics Co. Houston, TX, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateMarch 10, 1988Subject CategorySpace TransportationReport/Patent NumberREPT-1.0-WP-VA88003-41-VOL-1NASA-CR-185536-VOL-1NAS 1.26:185536-VOL-1Accession Number90N10950Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS9-17650Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900001634.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-12-00355-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF J.D.H., A CHILD

From the County Court at Law No. 2

Brazos County, Texas

Trial Court No. 11-003151-CV-CCL2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

James E. Polk attempts to appeal from the trial court’s order granting Wayland 

Hickman’s motion for summary judgment challenging Polk’s Petition in Intervention. 

A motion to dismiss his appeal has now been filed.

Polk’s motion is granted. The appeal is dismissed. TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1).

TOM GRAY

Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Appeal dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed November 29, 2012

[CV06]
§ 214.11 Intervention. ( a ) *Eligibility to intervene.* To participate as an intervenor in appeals under this part, a party must: ( 1 ) Be a holder, an operator, or a solicited applicant who claims an interest relating to the subject matter of the decision being appealed and is so situated that disposition of the appeal may impair that interest; and
( 2 ) File a written request to intervene with the Appeal Deciding Officer within 15 days after an appeal has been filed.
( b ) *Request to intervene.* A request to intervene must include: ( 1 ) The requester's name, mailing address, daytime telephone number, and email address, if any;
( 2 ) A brief description of the decision being appealed, including the name and title of the Responsible Official and the date of the decision;
( 3 ) The title or type and, if applicable, identification number for the written authorization and the date of application for or issuance of the written authorization, if applicable;
( 4 ) A description of the requester's interest in the appeal and how disposition of the appeal may impair that interest;
( 5 ) A discussion of the factual and legal allegations in the appeal with which the requester agrees or disagrees;
( 6 ) A description of additional facts and issues that are not raised in the appeal that the requester believes are relevant and should be considered;
( 7 ) A description of the relief sought, particularly as it differs from the relief sought by the appellant;
( 8 ) Where applicable, a response to the appellant's request for a stay of the decision being appealed;
( 9 ) Where applicable, a response to the appellant's request for an oral presentation;
( 10 ) Where applicable, a response to the appellant's request for mediation of a term grazing permit dispute under 36 CFR part 222, subpart B; and
( 11 ) The requester's signature and the date.
( c ) *Response to a request to intervene.* The appellant and Responsible Official shall have 5 days from receipt of a request to intervene to file a written response with the Appeal Deciding Officer.
( d ) *Intervention decision.* The Appeal Deciding Officer shall have 5 days after the date a response to a request to intervene is due to issue a decision granting or denying the request. The Appeal Deciding Officer's decision shall be in writing and shall briefly explain the basis for granting or denying the request. The Appeal Deciding Officer shall deny a request to intervene or shall withdraw a decision granting intervenor status as moot if the corresponding appeal is dismissed under § 214.10.
# EUR-Lex - 12004V211 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V211

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART III — THE POLICIES AND FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - TITLE III — INTERNAL POLICIES AND ACTION - CHAPTER III — POLICIES IN OTHER AREAS - Section 2 — Social policy - Article III-211 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0095 - 0095 *

Article III-211

1. The Commission shall promote the consultation of management and labour at Union level and shall adopt any relevant measure to facilitate their dialogue by ensuring balanced support for the parties.

2. For the purposes of paragraph 1, before submitting proposals in the social policy field, the Commission shall consult management and labour on the possible direction of Union action.

3. If, after the consultation referred to in paragraph 2, the Commission considers Union action desirable, it shall consult management and labour on the content of the envisaged proposal. Management and labour shall forward to the Commission an opinion or, where appropriate, a recommendation.

4. On the occasion of the consultation referred to in paragraphs 2 and 3, management and labour may inform the Commission of their wish to initiate the process provided for in Article III-212(1). The duration of this process shall not exceed nine months, unless the management and labour concerned and the Commission decide jointly to extend it.

--------------------------------------------------
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 198 (Friday, October 13, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 60483]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-8661]



[[Page 60483]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Defense Logistics Agency


Membership of the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) Senior Executive 
Service (SES) Performance Review Board (PRB)

AGENCY: Defense Logistics Agency, Department of Defense.

ACTION:  Notice of membership--2006 DLA PRB.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the appointment of members to the 
Defense Logistics Agency Senior Executive Service (SES) Performance 
Review Board (PRB). The publication of PRB composition is required by 5 
U.S.C. 4314(c)(4). The PRB provides fair and impartial review of Senior 
Executive Service performance appraisals and makes recommendations to 
the Director, Defense Logistics Agency, with respect to pay level 
adjustments and performance awards, and other actions related to 
management of the SES cadre.

DATES: Effective Date: September 26, 2006.

ADDRESSES: Defense Logistics Agency, 8725 John J. Kingman Road, STE 
2533, Fort Belvoir, Virginia, 22060-6221.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Laurie Hall, SES Program Manager, 
Human Resources (J-1), Defense Logistics Agency, Department of Defense, 
(703) 767-6404.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4), the 
following are the names and titles of DLA career executives appointed 
to serve as members of the SES PRB. Members will serve a 1-year term, 
which beings on September 26, 2006.
    PRB Chair: Major General Loren M. Reno, USAF.
    Members: Mr. Jeffrey Neal, Director, Human Resources, Ms. Mae De 
Vincentis, Director, Information Operations/CFO, Mr. Richard Connelly, 
Director, Defense Energy Support Center.

Robert T. Dail,
Lieutenant General, USA, Director, Defense Logistics Agency.
[FR Doc. 06-8661 Filed 10-12-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3620-01-M