alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1222.32 How do agencies manage records created or received by contractors? ( a ) Agency officials responsible for administering contracts must safeguard records created, processed, or in the possession of a contractor or a non-Federal entity by taking the following steps: ( 1 ) Agencies must ensure that contractors performing Federal government agency functions create and maintain records that document these activities. Agencies must specify in the contract Government ownership and the delivery to the Government of all records necessary for the adequate and proper documentation of contractor-operated agency activities and programs in accordance with requirements of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) (Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act of 1974 (Pub. L. 93-400), as amended by Pub. L. 96-83 41 U.S.C.), and, where applicable, the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) (48 CFR parts 200-299).
( 2 ) Records management oversight of contract records is necessary to ensure that all recordkeeping needs are met. All records created for Government use and delivered to, or under the legal control of, the Government must be managed in accordance with Federal law. In addition, electronic records and background electronic data specified for delivery to the contracting agency must be accompanied by sufficient technical documentation to permit understanding and use of the records and data.
( 3 ) Contracts that require the creation of data for the Government's use must specify, in addition to the final product, delivery of background supporting data or other records that may have reuse value to the Government. To determine what background supporting data or other records that contractors must deliver, program and contracting officials must consult with agency records and information managers and historians and, when appropriate, with other Government agencies to ensure that all Government needs are met, especially when the data deliverables support a new agency mission or a new Government program.
( 4 ) Deferred ordering and delivery-of-data clauses and rights-in-data clauses must be included in contracts whenever necessary to ensure adequate and proper documentation or because the data have reuse value to the Government.
( b ) All data created for Government use and delivered to, or falling under the legal control of, the Government are Federal records subject to the provisions of 44 U.S.C. chapters 21, 29, 31, and 33, the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), as amended, and the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended, and must be managed and scheduled for disposition only as provided in Subchapter B.
( c ) Agencies must ensure that appropriate authority for retention of classified materials has been granted to contractors or non-Government entities participating in the National Industrial Security Program (NISP), established under Executive order 12829, as amended, or a successor Order.
OMB Control No. xxxx-xxxx

About a week ago, we sent you a questionnaire, Oregon Salmon and 

Steelhead Recovery: What do YOU think should be done? If you have 

already returned your completed survey, please accept our sincere thanks.

If you have not gotten to it yet, please take some time to fill out the 

questionnaire and return it. As a resident of Oregon, you are one of the few 

who have been chosen to participate. Your answers will help us understand 

your opinions about these new programs.

If you did not receive the survey or it was misplaced, please contact TBD at 

###-###-#### and we will send a replacement today.

Regards,

[Insert Name]

Environmental Protection Agency
[Insert Name], [Title]

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Western Ecology Division

200 SW 35th St. 

Corvallis, Oregon
#### § 665.269 Annual Catch Limits (ACL).

(a) *General.* The ACLs limiting the amount of precious coral that may be taken in any precious coral permit area during the fishing year are listed in paragraph (c) of this section. Only live coral is counted toward the ACL. The accounting period for each fishing year for all precious coral ACLs begins July 1 and ends June 30 of the following year.

(b) *Reserves and reserve release.* The ACL for exploratory area X-P-H will be held in reserve for harvest by vessels of the United States in the following manner:

(1) At the start of the fishing year, the reserve for the Hawaii exploratory areas will equal the ACL minus the estimated domestic annual harvest for that year.

(2) As soon as practicable after December 31 each year, the Regional Administrator will determine the amount harvested by vessels of the United States between July 1 and December 31 of the year that just ended on December 31.

(3) NMFS will release to TALFF an amount of Hawaii precious coral for each exploratory area equal to the ACL minus two times the amount harvested by vessels of the United States in that July 1-December 31 period.

(4) NMFS will publish in the Federal Register a notification of the Regional Administrator's determination and a summary of the information on which it is based as soon as practicable after the determination is made.

(c) *Precious coral.* In accordance with § 665.4, the ACLs for MHI precious coral permit areas for each fishing year are as follows:

| Type of coral bed | Area and coral group | 2022-23 ACL (lb) | 2023-24 ACL (lb) | 2024-25 ACL (lb) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Established bed | Auau Channel—Black coral | 5,512 | 5,512 | 5,512 |
| | Makapuu Bed—Pink and red coral | 2,205 | 2,205 | 2,205 |
| | Makapuu Bed—Bamboo coral | 551 | 551 | 551 |
| Conditional Beds | 180 Fathom Bank—Pink and red coral | 489 | 489 | 489 |
| | 180 Fathom Bank—Bamboo coral | 123 | 123 | 123 |
| | Brooks Bank—Pink and red coral | 979 | 979 | 979 |
| | Brooks Bank—Bamboo coral | 245 | 245 | 245 |
| | Kaena Point Bed—Pink and red coral | 148 | 148 | 148 |
| | Kaena Point Bed—Bamboo coral | 37 | 37 | 37 |
| | Keahole Bed—Pink and red coral | 148 | 148 | 148 |
| | Keahole Bed—Bamboo coral | 37 | 37 | 37 |
| Exploratory Area | Hawaii—precious coral | 2,205 | 2,205 | 2,205 |

Table 1 to Paragraph (c)

Note 1 to § 665.269:

No fishing for coral is authorized in refugia.

Note 2 to § 665.269:

A moratorium on gold coral harvesting is in effect through June 30, 2028.

[85 FR 26624, May 5, 2020, as amended at 88 FR 14082, Mar. 7, 2023; 88 FR 88836, Dec. 26, 2023]
**MP** IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 19 - 02 57 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. RICHARD LEE TOME ,

Defendant and Appellant.

**GRANT OF EXTENSION** Upon consideration of Appellee ’ s motion for a 30 -day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, Appellee is gran ted an extension of time to and including October 19 , 2020 , within which to prepare, serve, and file its response brief.

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court September 16 2020

09/16/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0257
#### Patrick J. Hogue, Respondent, *v.*Morris W. Simonson et al., Appellants.

(Argued May 8, 1907;

decided May 28, 1907.)

*Hogue*v. *Simonson,*114 App. Div. 906, affirmed.

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered June 7, 1906, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover for an alleged breach of warranty.

■ *M. A. Leary*for appellants.

*Monroe Wheeler*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with-costs; no opinion.

Concur : Gray, O’Brien. *Yank, Werner,*Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ. Absent: Culler, Ch. J.
Received by OGC on Jan. 23, 2024
From: Isaac Campbell <icampbell@fec.gov> 

Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2024 1:17 PM

To: csira@votedown.org; William A. Powers <wpowers@nossaman.com>; Fred T. Dombo

<fdombo@nossaman.com>

Cc: Amy Rothstein <ARothstein@fec.gov>

Subject: [External] Advisory Opinion 2023-11 Commissioner's questions

All –

Good afternoon. A Commissioner has asked us to contact you with the following questions regarding 

your Advisory Opinion request: (1) Will VoteDown PAC be commissioning any polls from any of the 

“Approved Pollsters” in Appendix A of the request? ; and (2) Will VoteDown PAC be able to select the 

demographic, geographic scope, or other sample conditions for any polls provided by an Approved 

Pollster? 

Also, do you plan on participating in the Commission meeting on 1/25, either virtually or in person? I

ask because the Commissioners’ Office will need to coordinate your appearance. Please let me know 

as soon as possible.

Thanks in advance for your attention to this matter.

Best regards,

~ Isaac

Isaac R. Campbell (he/him/his)

Attorney

Federal Election Commission

Office of the General Counsel | Policy Division

1050 First Street, NE

Washington, DC 20463

O: (202) 694-1222

E: icampbell@fec.gov
§ 1120.5 Information published in the Federal Register. ( a ) *General.* In accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(1), basic information concerning the organization, operations, functions, substantive and procedural rules and regulations, officials, office locations, and allocation of responsibilities for functions and programs of the A&TBCB is published in the Federal Register for the guidance of the public. This information includes— ( 1 ) Description of the A&TBCB's organization and the established places at which, the employees from whom, and the methods whereby the public may obtain information, make submittals or requests, or obtain decisions;
( 2 ) Statements of the general course and method by which the A&TBCB's functions are channeled and determined, including the nature and requirements of all formal and informal procedures available;
( 3 ) Rules of procedure, descriptions of forms available or the places at which forms may be obtained, and instructions as to the scope and contents of all papers, reports, or examinations;
( 4 ) Substantive rules of general applicability adopted as authorized by law, and statements of general policy or interpretations of general applicability formulated and adopted by the A&TBCB, and
( 5 ) Each amendment, revision, or repeal of the foregoing. Indexes to the Federal Register are published in each daily issue and compiled currently on a monthly, quarterly, and annual basis. Copies of the Federal Register and its indexes are available in many libraries and may be purchased from the Superintendent of Documents, Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402. No formal request to examine documents in the Federal Register is necessary to inspect them at the place where they are kept. Materials incorporated by reference in the Federal Register are available for inspection in A&TBCB offices.
( b ) *Code of Federal Regulations.* Title 36 of the *Code of Federal Regulations,* which is republished and updated annually, contains a compilation of documents published by the A&TBCB in the Federal Register which set forth substantive and procedural rules and regulations of the A&TBCB and statements of general policy or interpretations of general applicability formulated and adopted by the Board. Copies of the Code of Federal Regulations are available in many libraries and may be purchased from the Superintendent of Documents. Reference copies maintained in offices of the A&TBCB are available for examination without formal request.
( c ) *Effect of nonpublication.* Except to the extent that a person has actual and timely notice of its terms, no person may in any manner be required to resort to, or be adversely affected by, any procedure or matter required to be published in the Federal Register, but not so published. For the purposes of this paragraph, material that is reasonably available to the class of persons affected by it is considered to be published in the Federal Register if it has been incorporated by reference in the Federal Register with the approval of the Director of the Federal Register.
EXHIBIT 11.1

                           EVEREST MEDICAL CORPORATION

                        Computation of Per Share Earnings

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                            Year Ended December 31
                                                     1996                 1995                  1994
                                                   ------                -------               -------
                                                 (amounts in thousands except per share data)

<S>                                              <C>                   <C>                   <C>
Primary

Average Common shares outstanding                   6,350                  5,789                 5,680

Net effect of dilutive stock options based
  on the treasury stock method using
  average market price                                  -                      -                     -
                                                   ------                -------               -------
                                                    6,350                  5,789                 5,680



Net Loss                                            (339)                  (773)                 (788)

Less preferred stock dividends                        355                    283                   183
                                                   ------                -------               -------
Loss applicable to Common Stock                     (694)                (1,056)                 (971)



Per Share Amounts:

  Net Loss per Common Share                      $ (0.11)               $ (0.18)              $ (0.17)


</TABLE>


Common stock equivalents relating to Convertible  Preferred Stocks,  Convertible
Notes and Outstanding  options and warrants have been excluded  because they are
anti-dilutive.  Because the Company is currently in a loss  position,  the Fully
Diluted section of this computation is not applicable.
Case 16-25482 Doc 4 Filed 08/09/16 Entered 08/09/16 09:43:18 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2
Case 16-25482 Doc 4 Filed 08/09/16 Entered 08/09/16 09:43:18 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2
March 28, 2012

Mr, Randall Fiertz

Director

Office of Airport Compliance and Management Analysis, ACO-1

Federal Aviation Administration

Orville Wright Building

800 Independence Avenue, S.W.

Washington, D.C. 20591

 

 Re: FAA Docket 2006-25867

 Chicago Midway International Airport, Airport Privatization Pilot Program

Dear Mr. Fiertz:

I am writing to provide further information about the current status of the City of Chicago’s (the 

“City”) proposed transferring of operations of Chicago Midway International Airport (the 

“Airport”) pursuant to the Airport Privatization Pilot Program (the “Pilot Program”) and 

specifically to supplement my letter of September 26, 2011, on behalf of the City, requesting an 

extension of time. The City will require a further extension of time to December 31, 2012, to 

submit its revised preliminary application relating to the Airport under the Pilot Program. 

It is the intent of the City to submit to the Federal Aviation Administration (“FAA”) updated 

information pertaining to the City’s Preliminary Application pursuant to the application 

procedures relating to the Pilot Program set forth in the Federal Register. This information will 

include at a minimum, an updated statement of the City’s authority to lease the Airport with a 

citation to legal authority, a reasonable and realistic timetable for transferring the Airport and

will be submitted by December 31, 2012, at which time, if the City moves forward, the City will 

have released a request for qualifications (”RFQ”) relating to the Airport’s participation in the 

Pilot Program. 

If the updated information is not submitted by the City to the FAA by December 31, 2012, the 

City acknowledges that the FAA will consider the City’s application to be officially withdrawn

and that the FAA will in fact withdraw the Airport’s slot, and close Docket 2006-25867. The 

City understands that, should the FAA receive and accept any preliminary applications for the 

large hub airport slot under the Pilot Program, the FAA will place the accepted preliminary 

applications on a standby list in the order received. The City further understands that the FAA 

will evaluate the City’s application and any preliminary applications for the large hub airport slot 

on the standby list and select the most qualified applicant capable of completing the requirements 

of the Pilot Program in a timely manner. 
As before, please let me know if the City can provide any additional information that would be 

helpful to you in considering the City’s request.

Lois A. Scott,

Chief Financial Officer
# EUR-Lex - 12008M046 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008M046

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on European Union - TITLE V: GENERAL PROVISIONS ON THE UNION'S EXTERNAL ACTION AND SPECIFIC PROVISIONS ON THE COMMON FOREIGN AND SECURITY POLICY - Chapter 2: Specific provisions on the common foreign and security policy - Section 2: Provisions on the common security and defence policy - Article 46 **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0040 - 0041 *

Article 46

1. Those Member States which wish to participate in the permanent structured cooperation referred to in Article 42(6), which fulfil the criteria and have made the commitments on military capabilities set out in the Protocol on permanent structured cooperation, shall notify their intention to the Council and to the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy.

2. Within three months following the notification referred to in paragraph 1 the Council shall adopt a decision establishing permanent structured cooperation and determining the list of participating Member States. The Council shall act by a qualified majority after consulting the High Representative.

3. Any Member State which, at a later stage, wishes to participate in the permanent structured cooperation shall notify its intention to the Council and to the High Representative.

The Council shall adopt a decision confirming the participation of the Member State concerned which fulfils the criteria and makes the commitments referred to in Articles 1 and 2 of the Protocol on permanent structured cooperation. The Council shall act by a qualified majority after consulting the High Representative. Only members of the Council representing the participating Member States shall take part in the vote.

A qualified majority shall be defined in accordance with Article 238(3)(a) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

4. If a participating Member State no longer fulfils the criteria or is no longer able to meet the commitments referred to in Articles 1 and 2 of the Protocol on permanent structured cooperation, the Council may adopt a decision suspending the participation of the Member State concerned.

The Council shall act by a qualified majority. Only members of the Council representing the participating Member States, with the exception of the Member State in question, shall take part in the vote.

A qualified majority shall be defined in accordance with Article 238(3)(a) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

5. Any participating Member State which wishes to withdraw from permanent structured cooperation shall notify its intention to the Council, which shall take note that the Member State in question has ceased to participate.

6. The decisions and recommendations of the Council within the framework of permanent structured cooperation, other than those provided for in paragraphs 2 to 5, shall be adopted by unanimity. For the purposes of this paragraph, unanimity shall be constituted by the votes of the representatives of the participating Member States only.

--------------------------------------------------
# EUR-Lex - 12008M029 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008M029

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on European Union - TITLE V: GENERAL PROVISIONS ON THE UNION'S EXTERNAL ACTION AND SPECIFIC PROVISIONS ON THE COMMON FOREIGN AND SECURITY POLICY - Chapter 2: Specific provisions on the common foreign and security policy - Section 1: Common provisions - Article 29 (ex Article 15 TEU) **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0033 - 0033 *

Article 29

(ex Article 15 TEU)

The Council shall adopt decisions which shall define the approach of the Union to a particular matter of a geographical or thematic nature. Member States shall ensure that their national policies conform to the Union positions.

--------------------------------------------------
#### Mary A. Beard, Respondent, *v.*The City of New York, Appellant.

*Beard*v. *City of New York,*119 App. Div. 894, appeal dismissed.

(Submitted November 18, 1907;

decided December 3, 1907.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the' Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered *525May 10, 1907, which affirmed an order of Special Term overruling the answer as frivolous and directing judgment for plaintiff.

*Francis II.*Pendleton, *Corporation Cownsel (James J). Bell*and *Jerome W. Coombs*of counsel), for appellant.

*Ralph James M. Bullowa*and *Sutherland D. Smith*for respondent.

Appeal dismissed, with costs, on the ground that this is an appeal from an order only and not from any judgment finally determining the action ; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ. Absent: O’Brien, J.
# EUR-Lex - 12006E181A - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12006E181A

**Treaty establishing the European Community (consolidated version) - Part Three - Community policies - TITLE XXI - Economic, financial and technical cooperation with third countries - Article 181 A **

*
Official Journal C 321 E , 29/12/2006 P. 0127 - 0127 Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0111 - Consolidated version *

Article 181a

1. Without prejudice to the other provisions of this Treaty, and in particular those of Title XX, the Community shall carry out, within its spheres of competence, economic, financial and technical cooperation measures with third countries. Such measures shall be complementary to those carried out by the Member States and consistent with the development policy of the Community.

Community policy in this area shall contribute to the general objective of developing and consolidating democracy and the rule of law, and to the objective of respecting human rights and fundamental freedoms.

2. The Council, acting by a qualified majority on a proposal from the Commission and after consulting the European Parliament, shall adopt the measures necessary for the implementation of paragraph 1. The Council shall act unanimously for the association agreements referred to in Article 310 and for the agreements to be concluded with the States which are candidates for accession to the Union.

3. Within their respective spheres of competence, the Community and the Member States shall cooperate with third countries and the competent international organisations. The arrangements for Community cooperation may be the subject of agreements between the Community and the third parties concerned, which shall be negotiated and concluded in accordance with Article 300.

The first subparagraph shall be without prejudice to the Member States' competence to negotiate in international bodies and to conclude international agreements.

--------------------------------------------------