alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Date of 

report 

1967 

Feb. 27 

27 

27 

27 

27 

27 

27 

27 

27 

27 

jtruatr nf t~r luitt~ ~tattS NINETIETH CONGRESS 

FIRST SESSION-Began January 10, 1967 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Prepared,under the direction of FRANCIS R. VALEO, Secretary of the Senate 

By GERALD A. HACKETT, Executive Clerk 

Tuesday, February 28, 1967 

TREATIES 

Calendar 

No Treaty No. Subject Action of committee . 

1 Ex. H. (89th Cong., Exploration of the Sea Convention ________ Reported favorably by 

2d sess.). Mr. Lausche, from the 

Committee on Foreign 

Relations, with a 

printed report. (See 

Ex. Rept. No. 1, 90th 

Cong., 1st sess.). 

2 Ex. T (89th Cong., Notes amending the Convention on Great Do. 

2d sess.). Lakes Fisheries. 

3 Ex. U (89th Cong., International Convention for the Conserva- Do. 

2d sess.). tion of Atlantic Tunas. 

4 Ex. Q (89th Cong., Convention of Mar del Plata on Facilitation Reported favorably by 

2d sess.). of International Waterborne Transporta- Mr. Lausche, from the 

tion. Committee on Foreign 

Relations, with a 

printed report. (See 

Ex. Rept. No. 2, 90th 

Con g., 1st sess.). 

5 Ex. R (89th Cong., Convention on Facilitation of International Do. 

2d sess.). Maritime Traffic. 

6 Ex. K (89th Customs Convention on the Temporary Im- Reported favorably by 

Cong., 2d sess.). portation of Professional Equipment. Mr. Lausche, from 

the Committee on 

Foreign Relations, 

with a printed 

report. (See Ex. 

Rept. No. 3, 90th 

Cong., 1st sess.) 

7 Ex. L (89th Customs Convention on the ATA Carnet Do. 

Cong., 2d sess.). for the Temporary Admission of Goods. 

8 Ex. M (89th Customs Convention Regarding ECS Car- Do. 

Cong., 2d sess.). nets for Commercial Samples. 

9 Ex. J (89th Customs Convention on Containers ________ Do. 

Cong., 2d sess.). 

10 Ex. N (89th Customs Convention on the International Do. 

Cong., 2d sess.). Transport of Goods Under Cover of TIR 

Garnets. 
2 

NOMINATIONS 

l>&lal!! Calendar ~g~ Name ofnommee Office Predecessor 

repQ<t No. 

DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

1967 

Feb. 27 31 88 Wilham B Macomber, Jr , An Assistant Secretary of 

of New York. State. 

27 32 58 Wilham Matson Roth, of Special representative for 

Califorrua trade negotiations, with 

the rank of Ambassador 

Extraordinary and 

Plenipotentiary. 

U.S. ARMS CONTROL 

AND DISARMAMENT 

AGENCY 

27 33 87 Maurme B. Neuberger, of Member of the General 

Oregon. AdVIsory Committee of 

the U.S. Arms Control 

and Disarmament 

Agency. 

INTER-AMERICAN 

DEVELOPMENT BANK 

27 34 66 William S. Gaud, of U.S. Alternate Governor 

Connecticut of the Inter-American 

Development Bank for a 

term of 5 years and until 

his successor has been 

appointed. 

U I, GOVIIt.NMlMT PllUITIHI Of'.f.&Cic UC7
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 579 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 579

  To provide for a comfortable and safe temperature level in dwelling 
   units receiving certain Federal housing assistance, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 1, 2023

   Mr. Rubio introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
    referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide for a comfortable and safe temperature level in dwelling 
   units receiving certain Federal housing assistance, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Safe Temperature Act of 2023''.

SEC. 2. COMFORTABLE AND SAFE TEMPERATURE LEVEL IN FEDERALLY ASSISTED 
              HOUSING.

    (a) Public Housing and Project-Based Assistance.--The United States 
Housing Act of 1937 (42 U.S.C. 1437 et seq.) is amended--
            (1) in section 8(o)(13) (42 U.S.C. 1437f(o)(13)), by adding 
        at the end the following:
                    ``(P) Maintaining temperature level in units.--The 
                Secretary may require the owner of a dwelling unit 
                receiving assistance under a housing assistance payment 
                under this paragraph to ensure that the dwelling unit 
                maintains a comfortable and safe temperature level 
                ranging from 71 degrees to 81 degrees Fahrenheit.''; 
                and
            (2) in section 9 (42 U.S.C. 1437g), by adding at the end 
        the following:
    ``(p) Use of Funds To Maintain Temperate Level in Units.--With 
respect to a public housing dwelling unit, the Secretary may use 
amounts in the Capital Fund or the Operating Fund to ensure that the 
dwelling unit maintains a comfortable and safe temperature level 
ranging from 71 degrees to 81 degrees Fahrenheit.''.
    (b) Supportive Housing for the Elderly.--Section 202 of the Housing 
Act of 1959 (12 U.S.C. 1701q) is amended by striking the first and 
second subsection (m) and inserting the following:
    ``(m) Maintaining Temperature in Units.--The Secretary may require 
the owner of housing assisted under this section to ensure that each 
unit in that housing maintains a comfortable and safe temperature level 
ranging from 71 degrees to 81 degrees Fahrenheit.''.
                                 <all>
```
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 5646 

Making continuing appropriations for military pay in the event of a 

Government shutdown. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 20 (legislative day, DECEMBER 16), 2024 

Mr. SULLIVAN (for himself, Ms. MURKOWSKI, Mr. BOOZMAN, Mr. SCOTT of 

Florida, Mr. SCOTT of South Carolina, and Mr. MORAN) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 

Armed Services 

A BILL 

Making continuing appropriations for military pay in the 

event of a Government shutdown. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Pay Our Military Act 

5 of 2024’’. 

6 SEC. 2. CONTINUING APPROPRIATIONS FOR MEMBERS OF 

7 THE ARMED FORCES. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—There are hereby appropriated for 

9 fiscal year 2025, out of any money in the Treasury not 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 5646 IS

1 otherwise appropriated, for any period during which in2 terim or full-year appropriations for fiscal year 2025 are 

3 not in effect— 

4 (1) such sums as are necessary to provide pay 

5 and allowances to members of the Armed Forces (as 

6 defined in section 101(a)(4) of title 10, United 

7 States Code), including reserve components thereof, 

8 who perform active service during such period; 

9 (2) such sums as are necessary to provide pay 

10 and allowances to the civilian personnel of the De11 partment of Defense (and the Department of Home12 land Security in the case of the Coast Guard) whom 

13 the Secretary concerned determines are providing 

14 support to members of the Armed Forces described 

15 in paragraph (1); and 

16 (3) such sums as are necessary to provide pay 

17 and allowances to contractors of the Department of 

18 Defense (and the Department of Homeland Security 

19 in the case of the Coast Guard) whom the Secretary 

20 concerned determines are providing support to mem21 bers of the Armed Forces described in paragraph 

22 (1). 

23 (b) SECRETARY CONCERNED DEFINED.—In this sec24 tion, the term ‘‘Secretary concerned’’ means— 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•S 5646 IS

1 (1) the Secretary of Defense with respect to 

2 matters concerning the Department of Defense; and 

3 (2) the Secretary of Homeland Security with re4 spect to matters concerning the Coast Guard. 

5 SEC. 3. TERMINATION. 

6 Appropriations and funds made available and author7 ity granted pursuant to this Act shall be available until 

8 whichever of the following first occurs: 

9 (1) The enactment into law of an appropriation 

10 (including a continuing appropriation) for any pur11 pose for which amounts are made available in sec12 tion 2. 

13 (2) The enactment into law of the applicable 

14 regular or continuing appropriations resolution or 

15 other Act without any appropriation for such pur16 pose. 

17 (3) January 1, 2026. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
**Exhibit 9.2**

**Deloitte**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-52934, No. 333-52934-01, No. 333-80245, No. 333-80245-01, No.333-70636, No. 333-07214, No. 333-07212 and No. 033-41068 of Koninklijke Ahold N.V. on Form F-3, Form S-3 and Form S-8, as applicable, of our report dated April 12, 2006 except for Note 17, for which the date is March 27, 2007 (which reportexpresses an unqualified opinion on the financial statements and includes explanatory paragraphs relating to the differences between International Financial Reporting Standards as adopted by the European Union and accounting principles generallyaccepted in the United States of America and retrospective adjustments for discontinued operations), relating to the consolidated financial statements of ICA AB and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2005 and for the year then ended, appearing inExhibit 15.1 to this Annual Report on amended Form 20-F of Koninklijke Ahold N.V. for the year ended December 31, 2006. 

/s/ Deloitte AB 

Deloitte AB 

Malmö, Sweden 

June 26, 2007
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 5626 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 5626

  To modify the Federal share of operating costs for certain projects 
that receive grants under the Formula Grants to Rural Areas Program of 
                  the Federal Transit Administration.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            December 19 (legislative day, December 16), 2024

 Ms. Smith (for herself and Mr. Rounds) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, 
                           and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To modify the Federal share of operating costs for certain projects 
that receive grants under the Formula Grants to Rural Areas Program of 
                  the Federal Transit Administration.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Investments in Rural Transit Act of 
2024''.

SEC. 2. INCREASED FEDERAL SHARE OF OPERATING COSTS FOR CERTAIN AREAS.

    Section 5311(g)(2) of title 49, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking in ``Assistance.--'' and all that follows 
        through ``subparagraph (B), a'' and inserting ``Assistance.--
        A'';
            (2) by striking ``50 percent'' and inserting ``80 
        percent''; and
            (3) by striking subparagraph (B).
                                 <all>
```
#### § 293.11 Water rights.

Nothing in the regulations in this part constitutes an expressed or implied claim or denial on the part of the Department of Agriculture as to exemption from State water laws.
# EUR-Lex - 12002E160 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 12002E160

**Treaty establishing the European Community (Nice consolidated version) - Part Three: Community policies - Title XVII: Economic and social cohesion - Article 160 - Article 130c - EC Treaty (Maastricht consolidated version) - **

*
Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0104 - 0104 Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0251 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0050 - Consolidated version *

Treaty establishing the European Community (Nice consolidated version)

Part Three: Community policies

Title XVII: Economic and social cohesion

Article 160

Article 130c - EC Treaty (Maastricht consolidated version)

Article 160

The European Regional Development Fund is intended to help to redress the main regional imbalances in the Community through participation in the development and structural adjustment of regions whose development is lagging behind and in the conversion of declining industrial regions.
#### § 1201.7 Why does NARA have to collect debts?

Federal agencies are required to try to collect claims of the Federal Government for money, funds, or property arising out of the agency's activities.
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 13-14135

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 4:13-cr-00030-RH-CAS-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

 versus

RICHARD TUCKER, 

 Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Florida

________________________

(July 17, 2014)

Before WILSON, PRYOR and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 

Case: 13-14135 Date Filed: 07/17/2014 Page: 1 of 2 
2

Chet Kaufman, on behalf of Randolph Murrell, appointed counsel for 

Richard Tucker, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the 

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 

1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals 

that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because 

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, 

counsel’s motion is GRANTED, and Tucker’s conviction and sentence are 

AFFIRMED.

Case: 13-14135 Date Filed: 07/17/2014 Page: 2 of 2
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SHAYLA DUKE; DAVID DUKE,

Plaintiffs

- Appellants,

v.

CLYDE SAIKI, in his personal and official capacity as former Director of Department of Human Services, State of Oregon; et al.,

Defendants

- Appellees,

and

DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES; et al.,

Defendants. No. 20

- 35155

D.C. No. 6: 17

- cv

- 00770

- MK

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Ann L. Aiken, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 8, 2021 * *

Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

NOV 17 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 20

- 35155

Shayla Duke appeal s pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing the

Dukes’ action alleging federal claims arising out of the reduction or termination of

government benefits

. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. W e review

for an abuse of discretion a dismissal for failure to comply with a court order

.

Pagtalunan v. Galaza , 291 F.3d 639, 640 (9th Cir. 2002). We affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing the Dukes’

action after the Duke s failed to file a fourth amended complaint as ordered or

inform the cour t of an affirmative choice not to amend

. See id. at 640, 642

- 43

( discussing factors to consider in determining whether to dismiss under Fed. R.

Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to comply with a court order; this court may review the

record independently to determine if the district court abused its discretion) ; see

also Edward

s v. Marin Park, Inc. , 356 F.3d 1058, 1065 (9th Cir. 2004) (“ The

failure of the plaintiff eventually to respond to the court ’ s ultimatum

— either by

amending the complaint or by indicating to the court that it will not do so

— is

properly met with the sanction of a Rule 41(b) dismissal. ”).

In light of our disposition, we do not consider Shayla Duke’s challenges to

the district court ’ s interlocutory o rder s

. See Al

- Torki v. Kaempen

, 78 F.3d 1381

,

1386 (9th Cir. 1996) (“[I]nterlocutory orders, generally appealabl e after final

judgment, are not appealable after a dismissal for failure to prosecute, whether the

failure to prosecute is purposeful or is a result of negligence or mistake.” (citation3 20

- 35155

and internal quotation marks omitted)).

We reject as meritless Shayla Duke’s contentions regarding the magistrate

judge’s jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)

.

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued

in the opening brief. See Padgett v. Wright , 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

Shayla Duke’ s request for appellate counsel , set forth in her opening brief, is

denied.

All pending motions are denied.

AFFIRMED.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-7358

ROOSEVELT CORNELL SANDERS, 

 Petitioner - Appellant, 

 v. 

TERRY O’BRIEN, Warden, 

 Respondent – Appellee, 

 and 

FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, 

 Respondent. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, District 

Judge. (7:09-cv-00026-gec-mfu) 

Submitted: October 5, 2009 Decided: October 19, 2009 

Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, 

Senior Circuit Judge. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Roosevelt Cornell Sanders, Appellant Pro Se. Rick A. 

Mountcastle, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, 

Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 

2 
3 

PER CURIAM: 

Roosevelt Cornell Sanders appeals the district court’s 

order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2006) petition. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See

Sanders v. O’Brien, No. 7:09-cv-00026-gec-mfu (W.D. Va. June 30, 

2009). We deny as moot Sanders’ motions to expedite the appeal. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

October 31, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

128904 Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 128904 

 COA: 261109 

Oakland CC: 03-188500-FH 

WAYNE ROY HONSINGER,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 12, 2005 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

d1024 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 31, 2005 

Clerk
§ 1230.3 What definitions apply to this part? ( a ) See § 1220.18 of this subchapter for definitions of terms used throughout Subchapter B, including part 1230.
( b ) As used in part 1230—
*Alteration* means the unauthorized annotation, addition, or deletion to a record.
*Deface* means to obliterate, mar, or spoil the appearance or surface of a record that impairs the usefulness or value of the record.
*Removal* means selling, donating, loaning, transferring, stealing, or otherwise allowing a record to leave the custody of a Federal agency without the permission of the Archivist of the United States.
*Unlawful or accidental destruction (also called unauthorized destruction)* means disposal of an unscheduled or permanent record; disposal prior to the end of the NARA-approved retention period of a temporary record (other than court-ordered disposal under § 1226.14(d) of this subchapter); and disposal of a record subject to a FOIA request, litigation hold, or any other hold requirement to retain the records.
#### §§ 92.13-92.19 [Reserved]
§ 264.2 Use of insignia. The Forest Service insignia is reserved for the official use of the Forest Service. Such use will be primarily for identification purposes. The Chief may authorize other uses of the insignia as follows: ( a ) *Public service use.* The Chief may authorize the use of the insignia for non-commercial educational purposes, without charge when such use is essentially a public service and will contribute to public knowledge and understanding of the Forest Service, its mission, and objectives. An example of this would be the use of the insignia on a printed program for a dedication ceremony where the Forest Service participates but is not the sponsor of the event.
( b ) *Commercial use.* Through the issuance of licenses, the Chief may authorize commercial use of the insignia to ( 1 ) contribute to the public recognition of the Forest Service, such as a likeness of the insignia on a toy forest ranger's truck or
( 2 ) promote employee esprit de corps or pride in the organization, such as a likeness of the insignia on belt buckles. Such use must be consistent with the status of a national insignia. Business or calling cards commercially prepared for employees, at employee expense, may display the insignia without special license.
#### § 1008.5 Federal Register notices describing systems of records.

The Privacy Act requires publication of a notice in the Federal Register describing each system of records subject to the Privacy Act. Such notice will be published prior to the establishment or a revision of the system of records. 5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(4).