alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Cite as State v. Butler , 2019-Ohio-1045.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO

BUTLER COUNTY

STATE OF OHIO, : Appellee, : CASE NO. CA2018-03-049

: D E C I S I O N - vs - 03/25/2019 : KEVIN BUTLER, : Appellant. :

CRIMINAL APPEAL FROM BUTLER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS Case No. CR2016-11-1622

Michael T. Gmoser, Butler County Prosecuting Attorney, Government Services Center, 315 High Street, 11th Floor, Hamilton, OH 45011-6057, for appellee Charles M. Conliff, Post Office Box 18424, Fairfield, OH 48018, for appellant

Per Curiam. {¶1} This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal filed by appellant, Kevin Butler, the transcript of the docket and journal entries, the transcript of proceedings and original papers from the Butler County Court of Common Pleas, and upon the brief filed by appellant's counsel. {¶2} Appellant's counsel has filed a brief with this court pursuant to Anders v.

California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), which (1) indicates that a careful review of the record from the proceedings below fails to disclose any errors by the trial courtButler CA2018-03-049

- 2 - prejudicial to the rights of appellant upon which an assignment of error may be predicated; (2) lists five potential errors "that might arguably support the appeal," Anders , at 744, 87 S.Ct. at 1400; (3) requests that this court review the record independently to determine whether the proceedings are free from prejudicial error and without infringement of appellant's constitutional rights; (4) requests permission to withdraw as counsel for appellant on the basis that the appeal is wholly frivolous; and (5) certifies that a copy of both the brief and motion to withdraw have been served upon appellant. {¶3} Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no response having been received, we have accordingly examined the record and find no error prejudicial to appellant's rights in the proceedings in the trial court. The motion of counsel for appellant requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is dismissed for the reason that it is wholly frivolous.

HENDRICKSON, P.J., PIPER and M. POWELL, JJ., concur.[Cite as State v. Butler , 2019-Ohio-1045.]
§ 1002.12 Audio disturbances. ( a ) The following are prohibited: ( 1 ) Operating motorized equipment or machinery such as an electric generating plant, motor vehicle, motorized toy, or an audio device, such as a radio, television set, tape deck or musical instrument, in a manner that exceeds a noise level of 60 decibels measured on the A-weighted scale at 50 feet; or that, if below that level, nevertheless makes noise which is unreasonable, considering the nature and purpose of the actor's conduct, location, time of day or night, purposes of the Presidio Trust Act, impact on visitors or tenants, and other factors that would govern the conduct of a reasonably prudent person under the circumstances.
( 2 ) In developed areas, operating a power saw, except pursuant to the terms and conditions of a permit.
( 3 ) In nondeveloped areas, operating any type of portable motor or engine, or device powered by a portable motor or engine, except pursuant to the terms and conditions of a permit.
( 4 ) Operating a public address system, except in connection with a public gathering or special event for which a permit has been issued pursuant to § 1002.50 or § 1002.51.
( b ) Violation of the terms and conditions of a permit issued in accordance with this section is prohibited and may result in the suspension or revocation of the permit.
# EUR-Lex - 12004V427 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V427

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART III — THE POLICIES AND FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - TITLE VII — COMMON PROVISIONS - Article III-427 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0183 - 0183 *

Article III-427

The Staff Regulations of officials and the Conditions of employment of other servants of the Union shall be laid down by a European law. It shall be adopted after consultation of the institutions concerned.

--------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

Wasliiiigton, DC 20463 

1 

2 

3 

1 4 

7 5 

0 6 

4 7 4 8 i 9 

4 10 

6 11 

2 12 

6 13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

• 24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

29 

30 

31 

32 

33 

34 

35 

MEMORANDUM 

TO; The Commission 

FROM: Lisa Stevenson ,/ 

Acting General Coj^el ^ 

Katlileen Giiith 

Associate General Connsel for Enforcement 

Mark Shoukwiler 

Assistant General Counsel 

Antoinette Fuoto 

Staff Attorney 

SUBJECT: MUR 6920 (American Cousei-vative Union, e/ o/.) 

RE: Office of the General Counsel's Notice to Commission and Respondents 

Following the Submission of Probable Cause Briefs 

On August 29, 2017, the Office of the General Counsel ("OGC") notified American 

Consei-vative Union ("ACU") that it was recommending that the Commission find probable 

cause to believe that ACU violated 52 U.S.C. § 30122 and 11 C.F.R. § 110.4(b)(l)(ii) by 

knowingly pennitting its name to be used to make a contribution in the name of another.' 

OGC's notification included a General Counsel's Brief setting forth the factual and legal basis 

for the recommendation. On September 12, 2017, ACU submitted a Reply.^ 

Pursuant to the Agency Procedure Following the Submission of Probable Cause Briefs by 

the Office of General Counsel. 76 Fed. Reg. 63,570 (Oct. 13, 2011), OGC is hereby notifying the 

Commission that it intends to proceed with the reconunendafiou to find probable cause to believe 

that ACU violated 52 U.S.C. § 30122 and 11 C.F.R. § 110.4(b)(l)(ii) based on the factual and 

legal analysis set forth in the General Counsel's Brief. 

' See 52 U.S.C. § 30109(a)(3); 11 C.F.R. §111.16(a); see aho Agency Procedure Following the Submission 

fo Probable Cause Briefs by the Office of General Counsel, 76 Fed. Reg. 63,570 (Oct. 13, 2011). 

' See ACU Probable Cause Brief Reply (Sept. 12, 2017). 
MUR 6920 (American Conservative Union, el al.) 

OGC Probable Cause Notice 

Page 2 

1 A copy of this Notice is being provided to the Respondents at the same time that it is 

2 circulated to the Commission. 

3 

4 RECOMMENDATION 

5 

6 Find probable cause to believe that American Conservative Union violated 52 U.S.C. § 

7 30122 and 11 C.F.R. § 110.4(b)(l)(ii).
# EUR-Lex - 12008E042 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008E042

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - PART THREE: UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS - TITLE III: AGRICULTURE AND FISHERIES - Article 42 (ex Article 36 TEC) **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0064 - 0064 *

Article 42

(ex Article 36 TEC)

The provisions of the Chapter relating to rules on competition shall apply to production of and trade in agricultural products only to the extent determined by the European Parliament and the Council within the framework of Article 43(2) and in accordance with the procedure laid down therein, account being taken of the objectives set out in Article 39.

The Council, on a proposal from the Commission, may authorise the granting of aid:

(a) for the protection of enterprises handicapped by structural or natural conditions;

(b) within the framework of economic development programmes.

--------------------------------------------------
# EUR-Lex - 12007P014 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12007P014

**Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - TITLE II - FREEDOMS - Article 14 - Right to education **

*
Official Journal 303 , 14/12/2007 P. 0005 - 0005 *

Article 14

Right to education

1. Everyone has the right to education and to have access to vocational and continuing training.

2. This right includes the possibility to receive free compulsory education.

3. The freedom to found educational establishments with due respect for democratic principles and the right of parents to ensure the education and teaching of their children in conformity with their religious, philosophical and pedagogical convictions shall be respected, in accordance with the national laws governing the exercise of such freedom and right.

--------------------------------------------------
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 190 (Monday, October 2, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 57983]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-8408]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Center for Complementary & Alternative Medicine; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Center for Complementary and 
Alternative Medicine Special Emphasis Panel, Clinical Research II.
    Date: November 9, 2006.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Two Democracy Plaza, 6707 
Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference 
Call).
    Contact Person: Laurie Friedman Donze, PhD., Scientific Review 
Administrator, Office of Scientific Review, National Center for 
Complementary and Alternative Medicine, NIH, 6707 Democracy Blvd., 
Suite 401, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-402-1030, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#583c3736223d34183539313476363130763f372e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="791d1617031c15391418101557171011571e160f">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: September 25, 2006.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 06-8408 Filed 9-29-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Total U.S. Exports to  Burkina

Data in Thousand Dollars 

Data For  JUN. 1999

|Group                  | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | Year to Date 6/1998 | Year to Date 6/1999 | % Change | Year Ending 6/1998 | Year Ending 6/1999 | % Change | % Share
|---------------------- | ---- | ---- | ---- | ---- | ------------------- | ------------------- | -------- | ------------------ | ------------------ | -------- | -------
|TEXTILES & APPAREL     | 1054 | 747  | 836  | 649  | 374                 | 260                 | -30.63   | 933                | 535                | -42.73   | 0      
|TEXTILE MILL PRODUCTS  | 1054 | 747  | 836  | 640  | 365                 | 260                 | -28.95   | 925                | 535                | -42.18   | 0.01   
|Fabric                 | 1034 | 747  | 836  | 635  | 360                 | 260                 | -27.81   | 919                | 535                | -41.82   | 0.01   
|Cotton Broadwoven Fabs | 723  | 478  | 382  | 512  | 246                 | 225                 | -8.66    | 445                | 491                | 10.31    | 0.05
# EUR-Lex - 12008E025 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008E025

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - PART TWO: NON-DISCRIMINATION AND CITIZENSHIP OF THE UNION - Article 25 (ex Article 22 TEC) **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0058 - 0058 *

Article 25

(ex Article 22 TEC)

The Commission shall report to the European Parliament, to the Council and to the Economic and Social Committee every three years on the application of the provisions of this Part. This report shall take account of the development of the Union.

On this basis, and without prejudice to the other provisions of the Treaties, the Council, acting unanimously in accordance with a special legislative procedure and after obtaining the consent of the European Parliament, may adopt provisions to strengthen or to add to the rights listed in Article 20(2). These provisions shall enter into force after their approval by the Member States in accordance with their respective constitutional requirements.

--------------------------------------------------
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of
Berkshire Realty Company, Inc. and Subsidiaries on Forms S-3 (File Numbers
333-29831, 333-32565, 333-34201, 333-41525, 333-44567, 333-48575, 333-50193, and
333-64631) and Forms S-8 (File Numbers 333-03997 and 333-58399) of our report
dated January 25, 1999, except for Note W, for which the date is March 5, 1999,
on our audits of the consolidated financial statements and financial statement
schedule of Berkshire Realty Company, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31,
1998 and 1997 and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31,
1998, which is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A.




                                                     /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers


Boston, Massachusetts
May 7, 1999
# EUR-Lex - 12006E146 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12006E146

**Treaty establishing the European Community (consolidated version) - Part Three - Community policies - TITLE XI - Social policy, education, vocational training and youth - Chapter 2 - The European Social Fund - Article 146 **

*
Official Journal C 321 E , 29/12/2006 P. 0111 - 0111 Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0097 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0243 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0046 - Consolidated version (EEC Treaty - no official publication available) *

Article 146

In order to improve employment opportunities for workers in the internal market and to contribute thereby to raising the standard of living, a European Social Fund is hereby established in accordance with the provisions set out below; it shall aim to render the employment of workers easier and to increase their geographical and occupational mobility within the Community, and to facilitate their adaptation to industrial changes and to changes in production systems, in particular through vocational training and retraining.

--------------------------------------------------
#### Harry Gleich, Respondent, *v.*Charles A. Cobb, as Administrator of the Estate of Jacob L. Cobb, Deceased, Appellant.

(Submitted March 14, 1907;

decided April 2, 1907.)

*Gleich*v. *Cobb,*110 App. Div. 918, affirmed.

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered January 6, 1906, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff *576entered upon a decision of the court on trial'at Special Term in an action to compel specific performance of a contract to convey real property.

*George V. Brower*for appellant.

*Herman G. Loew*and *George Tonkonogy*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Vann, Werner, Hisoook and Chase, JJ. Not sitting : Willard Bartlett, J.
GALDEN HT170 is a perfluoropolyether having the following chemical structrure:

CF3 - (OCFCF2)n - (OCF2)m - OCF3

CF3 

GALDEN HT170 is a High Performance, inert fluid suitable for use in HEAT TRANSFER

and DIELECTRIC APPLICATIONS requiring:

• High Thermal Stability

• Good Dielectric Properties

• Excellent Chemical Inertness

• Good Compatibility with metals, plastics and elastomers

• No Flash or Fire Point, No AutoIgnition Point

• Safety

Operating temperature range: from -30° to 160°C.

PROPERTY

Normal Boiling Point

Pour Point

Kinematic Viscosity @ -30°C

“ “ @ 25°C

Density @ -30°C

“ @ 25°C

Surface Tension @ 25°C

Vapor Pressure @ 25°C

Specific Heat @ -30°C

“ “ @ 25°C

Heat of Vaporization at Boiling Point

Thermal Conductivity @ -30°C

“ “ @ 25°C

Dielectric Strength @ 25°C

Dielectric Constant @ 25°C

Volume Resistivity @ 25°C

Solubility of Water

Solubility of Air

Flash Point

Molecular Weight

Units

°C

°C

cSt

“

g/cm3

“

Dyne/cm

Torr

cal/g°C

“ 

cal/g

W/m K

“

kV

2.54 mm gap

-

Ohm-cm

mg/Kg

ml gas/100ml liq

°C

amu

HT170

170

-97

11.6

1.8

1.90

1.77

18

0.8

0.193

0.232

16

0.070

0.065

40

1.94

1.5x1015

14

26

None

760

HT170

G

A

L

D

E

N

®

H

EAT

T

RA

N

S

F

E

R

F

L

UID
SOLVAY SOLEXIS SpA 

Viale Lombardia, 20

I-20021 Bollate, Milan - Italy

Phone +39 02 3835 1

Fax +39 02 3835 2129

solvaysolexisinfo@solvay.com

www.solvaysolexis.com

www.solvay.com

www.pfpefluids.com

-50 0 50 100 150 200

-50 0 50 100 150 200

1,400

1,450

1,500

1,550

1,600

1,650

1,700

1,750

1,800

1,850

1,900

1,950

Whilst every care has been taken by Solvay Solexis S.p.A. in the preparation of this document, no warranty is given to its

accuracy and completeness, nor as to compliance with laws so far as they may affect the content of this document.

Local laws and regulations (i.e. on consumers protection, safety, health and environment) are applicable.

The users shall be solely responsible of their respect.

Furthermore, freedom of use under patent or other similar rights should not be assumed.

April, 2005
§ 218.22 Proposed projects and activities subject to legal notice and opportunity to comment. The legal notice and opportunity to comment procedures of this subpart apply only to: ( a ) Proposed projects and activities implementing land management plans for which an environmental assessment (EA) is prepared;
( b ) Proposed projects and activities implementing land management plans for which a draft or supplemental environmental impact statement (EIS) is prepared and notice and comment procedures are governed by 40 CFR parts 1500 through 1508;
( c ) Proposed amendments to a land management plan that are included as part of a proposed project or activity covered in paragraphs (a) or (b) of this section which are applicable only to that proposed project or activity;
( d ) A proposed project or activity for which a supplemental or revised EA or EIS is prepared based on consideration of new information or changed circumstances; and
( e ) Proposed research activities to be conducted on National Forest System land for which an EA or EIS is prepared.
# EUR-Lex - 12008M/PRO/16 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008M/PRO/16

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on European Union - PROTOCOLS - Protocol (No 16) on certain provisions relating to Denmark **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0287 - 0287 *

PROTOCOL (No 16)

ON CERTAIN PROVISIONS RELATING TO DENMARK

THE HIGH CONTRACTING PARTIES,

TAKING INTO ACCOUNT that the Danish Constitution contains provisions which may imply a referendum in Denmark prior to Denmark renouncing its exemption,

GIVEN THAT, on 3 November 1993, the Danish Government notified the Council of its intention not to participate in the third stage of economic and monetary union,

HAVE AGREED UPON the following provisions, which shall be annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union:

1. In view of the notice given to the Council by the Danish Government on 3 November 1993, Denmark shall have an exemption. The effect of the exemption shall be that all Articles and provisions of the Treaties and the Statute of the ESCB referring to a derogation shall be applicable to Denmark.

2. As for the abrogation of the exemption, the procedure referred to in Article 140 shall only be initiated at the request of Denmark.

3. In the event of abrogation of the exemption status, the provisions of this Protocol shall cease to apply.

--------------------------------------------------
NO. 07-11-00089-CR 

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

AT AMARILLO 

PANEL A 

SEPTEMBER 9, 2011 

MARK ANTHONY LUCIO, APPELLANT 

v. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE 

FROM THE 64TH DISTRICT COURT OF HALE COUNTY; 

NO. A17785-0809; HONORABLE ROBERT W. KINKAID JR., JUDGE 

Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ. 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

 Appellant, Mark Anthony Lucio, pleaded guilty to the felony offense of burglary of 

a habitation1

 and, pursuant to a plea bargain, was placed on deferred adjudication 

community supervision for eight years. Subsequently, the State filed a motion to 

adjudicate the offense. Appellant was adjudicated guilty of the burglary offense and 

sentenced to serve a term of confinement for 11 years in the Institutional Division of the 

 1 See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 30.02(a)(1) (West 2011).
2 

Texas Department of Criminal Justice. Appellant appealed the trial court’s judgment. 

We affirm. 

Appellant=s attorney has filed an Anders brief and a motion to withdraw. Anders 

v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed. 2d 498 (1967). In support of his 

motion to withdraw, counsel certifies that he has diligently reviewed the record, and in 

his opinion, the record reflects no reversible error upon which an appeal can be 

predicated. Id. at 744-45. In compliance with High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 813 

(Tex.Crim.App. 1978), counsel has candidly discussed why, under the controlling 

authorities, there is no error in the trial court=s judgment. Additionally, counsel has 

certified that he has provided appellant a copy of the Anders brief and motion to 

withdraw and appropriately advised appellant of his right to file a pro se response in this 

matter. Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 510 (Tex.Crim.App. 1991). The Court has 

also advised appellant of his right to file a pro se response. Appellant did not file a 

response. By his Anders brief, counsel reviewed all grounds that could possibly support 

an appeal, but concludes the appeal is frivolous. We have reviewed these grounds and 

made an independent review of the entire record to determine whether there are any 

arguable grounds which might support an appeal. See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 

109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988); Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824 

(Tex.Crim.App. 2005). We have found no such arguable grounds and agree with 

counsel that the appeal is frivolous. 
3 

Accordingly, counsel=s motion to withdraw is hereby granted and the trial court=s 

judgment is affirmed.2

 Mackey K. Hancock 

 Justice 

Do not publish. 

 2

 Counsel shall, within five days after this opinion is handed down, send his client 

a copy of the opinion and judgment, along with notification of appellant=s right to file a 

pro se petition for discretionary review. See TEX. R. APP. P. 48.4.