alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Total U.S. Exports to  Belarus

Data in Thousand Dollars 

Data For  JUN. 1999

|Group                  | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | Year to Date 6/1998 | Year to Date 6/1999 | % Change | Year Ending 6/1998 | Year Ending 6/1999 | % Change | % Share
|---------------------- | ---- | ---- | ---- | ---- | ------------------- | ------------------- | -------- | ------------------ | ------------------ | -------- | -------
|TEXTILES & APPAREL     | 542  | 914  | 3364 | 4260 | 3288                | 320                 | -90.27   | 5491               | 1292               | -76.46   | 0.01   
|TOTAL APPAREL          | 131  | 87   | 742  | 2412 | 2104                | 36                  | -98.29   | 2827               | 344                | -87.83   | 0      
|TEXTILE MILL PRODUCTS  | 411  | 827  | 2622 | 1848 | 1184                | 284                 | -76.01   | 2665               | 948                | -64.41   | 0.01   
|Yarn                   | 6    | 13   | 84   | 55   | 51                  | 106                 | 106.72   | 59                 | 110                | 87.02    | 0.01   
|Fabric                 | 175  | 814  | 2237 | 1269 | 931                 | 128                 | -86.25   | 2214               | 466                | -78.95   | 0.01   
|Made-Up Arts           | 231  | 0    | 301  | 524  | 202                 | 50                  | -75.28   | 391                | 372                | -4.97    | 0.02   
|Hosiery                | 3    | 0    | 631  | 2364 | 2088                | 0                   | -100     | 2719               | 276                | -89.84   | 0.06   
|Spun Yrns & Thread     | 6    | 13   | 84   | 55   | 51                  | 106                 | 106.72   | 59                 | 110                | 87.02    | 0.01   
|Speclty & Indstrl Fabs | 0    | 20   | 1005 | 565  | 286                 | 45                  | -84.24   | 847                | 324                | -61.73   | 0.02   
|Floor Coverings        | 207  | 0    | 249  | 465  | 145                 | 15                  | -89.76   | 295                | 334                | 13.31    | 0.04
§ 212.81 Over-snow vehicle use. ( a ) *General.* Over-snow vehicle use on National Forest System roads, on National Forest System trails, and in areas on National Forest System lands shall be designated by the Responsible Official on administrative units or Ranger Districts, or parts of administrative units or Ranger Districts, of the National Forest System where snowfall is adequate for that use to occur, and, if appropriate, shall be designated by class of vehicle and time of year, provided that the following uses are exempted from these decisions: ( 1 ) Limited administrative use by the Forest Service;
( 2 ) Use of any fire, military, emergency, or law enforcement vehicle for emergency purposes;
( 3 ) Authorized use of any combat or combat support vehicle for national defense purposes;
( 4 ) Law enforcement response to violations of law, including pursuit; and
( 5 ) Over-snow vehicle use that is specifically authorized under a written authorization issued under Federal law or regulations.
( b ) *Previous over-snow vehicle decisions.* Public notice with no further public involvement is sufficient if an administrative unit or a Ranger District has made previous administrative decisions, under other authorities and including public involvement, which restrict over-snow vehicle use to designated routes and areas over the entire administrative unit or Ranger District, or parts of the administrative unit or Ranger District, where snowfall is adequate for OSV use to occur, and no change is proposed to these previous decisions.
( c ) *Identification of roads, trails, and areas for over-snow vehicle use.* Designation of National Forest System roads, National Forest System trails, and areas on National Forest System lands for over-snow vehicle use shall be reflected on an over-snow vehicle use map. Over-snow vehicle use maps shall be made available to the public at headquarters of corresponding administrative units and Ranger Districts of the National Forest System and, as soon as practicable, on the Web site of the corresponding administrative units and Ranger Districts. Over-snow vehicle use maps shall specify the classes of vehicles and the time of year for which use is designated, if applicable.
( d ) *Decision-making process.* Except as modified in paragraph (b) of this section, the requirements governing designation of National Forest System roads, National Forest System trails, and areas on National Forest System lands in §§ 212.52 (public involvement), 212.53 (coordination), 212.54 (revision), 212.55 (designation criteria (including minimization)), and 212.57 (monitoring), shall apply to decisions made under this subpart. In making decisions under this subpart, the Responsible Official shall recognize the provisions concerning rights of access in sections 811(b) and 1110(a) of the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act (16 U.S.C. 3121(b) and 3170(a), respectively).
[80 FR 4511, Jan. 28, 2015]
Case 16-25492 Doc 10 Filed 08/11/16 Entered 08/12/16 09:41:23 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

In the Matter of ) 

Mike Braun for Indiana and Thomas 

Datwyler in his official capacity as 

treasurer (the "Committee"): 

Recommendation to Accept Pre-Probable 

Cause Conciliation Agreement 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

MUR 8107 

CERTIFICATION 

I, Vicktoria J. Allen, Deputy Secretary of the Federal Election 

Commission, do hereby certify that on February 21, 2024, the Commission 

decided by a vote of 6-0 to take the following actions in MUR 8107: 

1. Accept the signed Conciliation Agreement with Mike Braun for 

Indiana, as recommended in the Memorandum to the Commission 

dated February 9, 2024. 

2. Approve the appropriate letters. 

3. Close the file. 

Commissioners Broussard, Cooksey, Dickerson, Lindenbaum, Trainor, and 

Weintraub voted affirmatively for the decision. 

 Attest: 

 February 21, 2024 

 

Date Vicktoria J. Allen 

 Deputy Secretary of the Commission 

Vicktoria J Allen Digitally signed by Vicktoria J 

Allen 

Date: 2024.02.21 16:21:57 -05'00'

MUR810700109
§ 13.1132 What types of commercial fishing are authorized in Glacier Bay? Three types of commercial fishing are authorized in Glacier Bay non-wilderness waters: Longline fishing for halibut; pot and ring fishing for Tanner crab; and trolling for salmon. ( a ) All other commercial fishing, or a buying or a processing operation not related to an authorized fishery is prohibited in Glacier Bay.
( b ) On October 1, 2000, each fishery will be limited to fishermen who qualify for a non-transferable commercial fishing lifetime access permit (see § 13.1134). Commercial fishing without a permit issued by the superintendent, or other than in accordance with the terms and conditions of the permit, is prohibited.
( c ) The Superintendent shall include in a permit the terms and conditions that the superintendent deems necessary to protect park resources. Violating a term or condition of the permit is prohibited.
Exhibit 23

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-21287) pertaining to the 1996 Stock Incentive Plan of
International Telecommunication Data Systems, Inc., in the Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-21283) pertaining to the 1996 Employee Stock
Purchase Plan of International Telecommunication Data Systems, Inc. and in the
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-47865) pertaining to the 1997 Stock
Incentive Plan of International Telecommunication Data Systems, Inc. of our
report dated February 10, 1998, except for information describing the
three-for-two stock split in Note 1 and Note 3 as to which the date is February
23, 1998, with respect to the financial statements of International
Telecommunication Data Systems, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form
10-K/A) for the year ended December 31, 1997.


                                                   /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Stamford, Connecticut
March 30, 1998
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         256,052
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  206,020
<ALLOWANCES>                                     7,451
<INVENTORY>                                    208,075
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               855,106
<PP&E>                                       1,392,716
<DEPRECIATION>                                 593,170
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,994,643
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,428,767
<BONDS>                                        481,496
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,549,215
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,994,643
<SALES>                                        657,124
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               657,124
<CGS>                                          515,272
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  577,575
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (2,401)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,616
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 65,334
<INCOME-TAX>                                    27,871
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             37,958
<DISCONTINUED>                                   1,737
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    39,695
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.72
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.72


</TABLE>
#### § 14.55 Consultation with local bureau officials, program values.

An applicant will be expected, at the earliest possible date prior to the filing of an application, to consult with the local officials of the National Park Service to ascertain whether or not the use or appropriation of the lands for right-of-way purposes is consistent with the Service's management program and to agree to such measures as may be necessary to maintain program values. Failure to do so may lead to an unresolvable conflict of interest and necessitate disallowance of the application.
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memo r andum Opinion filed

September 29 , 2020

.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 20

- 00235

- CV

IN RE ALLSTATE FIRE AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY , Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 133rd District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2018

- 86632



### MEMORANDUM OPINION

On March 24, 2020 , relator Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance Company filed a petition for writ of m andamus in this court

. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator ask s this court to compel the Honorable Jaclanel McFarland, presiding judge of the 133rd District
Court of Harris County
, to set aside her January 24, 2020 order compelling Al lstate2

to produce one or more corporate representatives for deposition in the underlying
uninsured/underinsured motorist case.
Relator has not shown that it is entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. W e lift our stay entered on March 25,
2020.

PER CURIAM

Panel c onsists of Justices Bourliot, Hassan, and Poissant.
# EUR-Lex - 12006E292 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12006E292

**Treaty establishing the European Community (consolidated version) - Part Six - General and final provisions - Article 292 **

*
Official Journal C 321 E , 29/12/2006 P. 0172 - 0172 Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0148 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0295 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0075 - Consolidated version (EEC Treaty - no official publication available) *

Article 292

Member States undertake not to submit a dispute concerning the interpretation or application of this Treaty to any method of settlement other than those provided for therein.

--------------------------------------------------
#### § 216.2 Definition.

*Directive* means the contents of the Forest Service Manual and Forest Service Handbooks issued as described at 36 CFR 200.4(c).

[85 FR 2864, Jan. 16, 2020]
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

In re: 

JAQUEENLHA S JONES

Debtor(s)

Case No. 16-29317

CHAPTER 13 STANDING TRUSTEE’S FINAL REPORT AND ACCOUNT

Tom Vaughn, chapter 13 trustee, submits the following Final Report and Account of the 

administration of the estate pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1302(b)(1). The trustee declares as follows:

1) The case was filed on 09/14/2016.

2) The plan was confirmed on NA .

3) The plan was modified by order after confirmation pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1329 on

NA .

4) The trustee filed action to remedy default by the debtor in performance under the plan 

on NA .

5) The case was dismissed on 10/05/2016.

6) Number of months from filing to last payment: 0.

7) Number of months case was pending: 2.

8) Total value of assets abandoned by court order: NA .

9) Total value of assets exempted: NA .

10) Amount of unsecured claims discharged without payment: $0.00.

11) All checks distributed by the trustee relating to this case have cleared the bank.

UST Form 101-13-FR-S (09/01/2009)

Case 16-29317 Doc 14 Filed 11/22/16 Entered 11/22/16 11:06:14 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 3
Receipts:

Total paid by or on behalf of the debtor $0.00

Less amount refunded to debtor $0.00

NET RECEIPTS: $0.00

Expenses of Administration:

Attorney’s Fees Paid Through the Plan $0.00

Court Costs $0.00

Trustee Expenses & Compensation $0.00

Other $0.00

TOTAL EXPENSES OF ADMINISTRATION: $0.00

Attorney fees paid and disclosed by debtor: $0.00

Scheduled Creditors:

Creditor

Name Class

Claim

Scheduled

Claim

Asserted

Claim

Allowed

Int.

Paid

Principal

Paid

Summary of Disbursements to Creditors:

Secured Payments:

Mortgage Ongoing

Mortgage Arrearage

Debt Secured by Vehicle

All Other Secured

TOTAL SECURED:

Priority Unsecured Payments:

Domestic Support Arrearage

Domestic Support Ongoing

All Other Priority

TOTAL PRIORITY:

GENERAL UNSECURED PAYMENTS:

Claim

Allowed

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

Principal

Paid

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

Interest

Paid

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

UST Form 101-13-FR-S (09/01/2009)

Case 16-29317 Doc 14 Filed 11/22/16 Entered 11/22/16 11:06:14 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 3
Disbursements:

Expenses of Administration $0.00

Disbursements to Creditors $0.00

TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS : $0.00

12) The trustee certifies that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 5009, 

the estate has been fully administered, the foregoing summary is true and complete, and all 

administrative matters for which the trustee is responsible have been completed. The trustee 

requests a final decree be entered that discharges the trustee and grants such other relief as may 

be just and proper.

Dated: 11/22/2016

STATEMENT: This Unified Form is associated with an open bankruptcy case, therefore, Paperwork Reduction 

Act exemption 5 C.F.R. § 1320.4(a)(2) applies.

By:/s/ Tom Vaughn

Trustee

UST Form 101-13-FR-S (09/01/2009)

Case 16-29317 Doc 14 Filed 11/22/16 Entered 11/22/16 11:06:14 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 3
Annual

Emission 

Rate

(lb/MMBTu)

Percent

Reduction

(%)

Annual

Emissions

(tons)

Emission 

Reduction

(tons)

Baseline 0.395 NA 5178 NA

Lime Injection 0.150 62.0% 1966 3212

Lime Injection with Additional Scrubber Vessel 0.080 79.7% 1049 4129

Lime Injection Costs ($2007)

Total Capital Investment $3,000,000

Direct Annual Costs $1,600,000

Indirect Annual Costs $283,200

Total Annual Costs $1,883,200

Cost Effectiveness $586/ton

Lime Injection with Additional Scrubber Vessel Costs 

($2007)

Total Capital Investment $28,000,000

Direct Annual Costs $1,450,000

Indirect Annual Costs $2,643,200

Total Annual Costs $4,093,200

Cost Effectiveness $991/ton

Notes:

(1) Baseline emissions are from CAMD, 2008-2010.

(2) Costs are from 2007 and 2008 PPL reports.

(3) Cost are in 2007$.

Colstrip Unit 2 SO2 Emissions and Costs Summary
Control Option

Annual

Emission 

Rate

(lb/MMBTu)

Percent

Reduction

(%)

Annual

Emissions

(tons)

Emission 

Reduction

(tons)

Baseline 0.309 NA 4028 NA

SOFA 0.200 35.3% 2608 1420

SNCR+SOFA 0.150 51.4% 1956 2072

SCR+SOFA 0.050 83.8% 652 3376

(1) Baseline emissions are from CAMD, 2008-2010.

Colstrip 2 NOx Emissions Summary
#### § 1151.2 Authority.

The Board is the governing body of the agency. The Board shall have the authority and responsibilities as set forth in section 502 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 792); section 504 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 12204); and section 225(e) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. 255(e)).

[63 FR 1924, Jan. 13, 1998, as amended at 87 FR 69169, Nov. 18, 2022]
# EUR-Lex - 12008E/AFI/DCL/11 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008E/AFI/DCL/11

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - DECLARATIONS annexed to the Final Act of the Intergovernmental Conference which adopted the Treaty of Lisbon, signed on 13 December 2007 - A. DECLARATIONS CONCERNING PROVISIONS OF THE TREATIES - 11. Declaration on Article 17(6) and (7) of the Treaty on European Union **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0342 - 0342 *

11. Declaration on Article 17(6) and (7) of the Treaty on European Union

The Conference considers that, in accordance with the provisions of the Treaties, the European Parliament and the European Council are jointly responsible for the smooth running of the process leading to the election of the President of the European Commission. Prior to the decision of the European Council, representatives of the European Parliament and of the European Council will thus conduct the necessary consultations in the framework deemed the most appropriate. These consultations will focus on the backgrounds of the candidates for President of the Commission, taking account of the elections to the European Parliament, in accordance with the first subparagraph of Article 17(7). The arrangements for such consultations may be determined, in due course, by common accord between the European Parliament and the European Council.

--------------------------------------------------
[Civ. No. 15616.

Second Dist., Div. Two.

Mar. 4, 1947.]

#### MINNIE BELL, Respondent, v. KELLY BELL, Appellant.

William Ellis Lady for Appellant.

Curtis C. Taylor for Respondent.

McCOMB, J.

From an order denying defendants’ motion to set aside his default and permit him to file an answer and a cross-complaint to plaintiff’s complaint for divorce, defendant Bell appeals.

These are the undisputed facts:

> On or about October 17, 1945, plaintiff commenced an action for divorce against defendant. Thereafter defendant was served with the complaint and summons issued thereon, and on October 19, 1945, an order to show cause was issued directing defendant to appear on October 25, 1945, and show cause why he should not pay a reasonable sum for attorney’s fees and court costs. This order was served on defendant and thereafter regularly continued until November 2, 1945, when an appropriate order was made. After the eommence*354meat of the action plaintiff took possession of an automobile owned by defendant, whereupon defendant wrote a letter to Judge Baird concerning the matter. Judge Baird advised him to employ a lawyer, whereupon defendant went to the public defender of the city of Los Angeles, who advised him that his office could not appear in the cause. On December 10, 1945, defendant went to see Attorney Earl C. Broady and engaged him to represent him in the defense of his action. However, on November 30, 1945, defendant’s default had been entered and on January 8, 1946, the case was set for trial and an interlocutory decree of divorce was granted on January 23, 1946.

On April 22, 1946, defendant’s motion to set aside his default was denied.

This is the sole question necessary for us to determine:

> *Did the trial court atuse its discretion in denying defendant’s motion under section 473 of the Code of Civil Procedure to set aside the default which had teen entered against him?*

This question must be answered in the negative. A default may be set aside under the provisions of section 473 of the Code of Civil Procedure where it is shown that a default has been entered due to the (1) mistake, (2) inadvertence, (3) surprise, or (4) excusable neglect of defendant. In the instant ease there is no showing bringing the present motion within any of the grounds mentioned in said section. It was more than a month after service of summons and complaint upon defendant before plaintiff sought the entry of defendant’s default. It was more than another month thereafter before the case was set for trial and some two weeks later the interlocutory decree of divorce was granted. Defendant has failed to show any excuse for not having sooner employed an attorney and taken appropriate steps either to prevent the entry of his default or to have his default set aside.

This case falls clearly within the rules set forth in *Elms*v. *Elms,*72 Cal.App.2d 508, 513 [164 P.2d 936].

The judgment is affirmed.

Moore, P. J., and Wilson, J., concurred.

Appellant’s petition for a hearing by the Supreme Court was denied May 1,1947.