alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 90.12 Interpretation.

The authorization contained in the Act limits the availability of grain acquired through price support operations to the prevention of crop damage by migratory waterfowl (brant, wild ducks, geese, and swans) and such grain may not be made available for the feeding of any other species of migratory birds, whether or not such other species of migratory birds are committing or threatening to commit crop damage. Further, the Act does not authorize the use of such grain to conduct a migratory waterfowl feeding program for the purpose of augmenting natural sources of food available to migratory waterfowl, nor for any purpose incident to migratory waterfowl management not related to the prevention of crop damage. Accordingly, such grain shall not be made available pursuant to the Act to augment or to substitute for natural sources of migratory waterfowl food except as may be determined by the Secretary to be necessary to aid in the prevention of crop damage by such birds.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,395
<ALLOWANCES>                                       708
<INVENTORY>                                     64,482
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                70,133
<PP&E>                                          38,351
<DEPRECIATION>                                  22,046
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  93,533
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           44,309
<BONDS>                                         21,267
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            10
<OTHER-SE>                                      37,497
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    93,533
<SALES>                                        155,474
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               155,474
<CGS>                                           91,134
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   91,134
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                45,309
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,037
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,993
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,038
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,695
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,343
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 10,057
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    17,400
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.12
        

</TABLE>
1

Daniels, Nia (FAA)

From: Daniels, Nia (FAA)

Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 11:45 AM

To: 'kenneth.quinn@pillsburylaw.com'

Cc: Cooper, Thuy (FAA); Pappas, Rob (FAA); Schandler, Andrea (FAA); Pearson, Lakisha 

(FAA); Hoekstra, Kathlyn (FAA)

Subject: Request for Additional Information

March 3, 2015 

Mr. Kenneth P. Quinn 

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman, LLP 

1200 17th Street, NW 

Washington, DC 20036-3006 

Dear Mr. Quinn: 

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA2014-1060). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your 

petition. 

 Your petition references the materials listed below, however the materials were not submitted for the 

record. Please provide a copy of the following referenced materials: 

o Skyworks’ operating manual 

o Operator’s manual 

o Standard operating procedures 

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit 

any proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or electronically via e-mail to 

333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the information 

described above by March 17, 2015. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without 

notifying you further. 

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

Nia Daniels 

Program Analyst
```

[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 195 (Tuesday, October 10, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 59448]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-8542]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

Public Information Collection requirement Submitted to Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) for Review

AGENCY: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

ACTION: Notice of Submission of Information Collection 3038-
0017, Market Surveys.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commodity Futures Trading commission has submitted 
information collection 3038-0017, Market Surveys, to OMB for review and 
clearance under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-13). 
The information collected pursuant to these rules is in the public 
interest and is necessary for market surveillance.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before November 9, 2006.

ADDRESSES: Persons wishing to comment on this information collection 
should contact Gary J. Martinaitis, Division of Market Oversight, U.S. 
Commodity Futures Trading commission, 1155 21st Street, NW., 
Washington, DC 20581; (202) 418; Fax (202) 418-5527; e-mail: 
[email protected].
    Title: market Surveys.
    Control Number: 3038-0017.
    Action: Extension.
    Respondents: businesses (excluding small businesses).
    Estimated Annual Burden: 700 total hours.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                        Respondents                          Businesses
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation (17 CFR).......................................         21.02
Estimated Number of respondents...........................           400
Reports annually be each respondents......................             1
Total annual responses....................................           400
Estimated number of hours per response....................          1.75
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Dated: Issued in Washington, DC, on October 3, 2006.
Eileen A. Donovan,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 06-8542 Filed 10-6-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```
*

 This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of

law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. This court generally disfavors the

citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under

the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

Filed 1/24/97

TENTH CIRCUIT

LAVERN ABNEY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CITY OF TOPEKA,

Defendant - Appellee.

No. 96-3178

(D.C. No. 95-4013-SAC)

(District of Kansas)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before BALDOCK, KELLY and LUCERO, Circuit Judges.

Plaintiff Lavern Abney appeals the district court’s entry of summary

judgment in favor of defendant City of Topeka. See Abney v. City of Topeka,

No. 95-4013-SAC, 1996 WL 254604 (D. Kan. Apr. 16, 1996). Mr. Abney alleges

he was denied a promotion in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment

Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-634.

Summary judgment is only appropriate if the “pleadings, depositions,

answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if
-2-

any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the

moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c). 

We review the grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same standard

used by the district court. Ball v. Renner, 54 F.3d 664, 665 (10th Cir. 1995). 

Upon careful consideration of the record, the briefs of the parties, the district

court’s order, and applicable law, we affirm for substantially the reasons stated in

the district court’s order.

AFFIRMED.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT

Carlos F. Lucero

Circuit Judge
# EUR-Lex - 12008E034 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008E034

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - PART THREE: UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS - TITLE II: FREE MOVEMENT OF GOODS - Chapter 3: Prohibition of quantitative restrictions between Member States - Article 34 (ex Article 28 TEC) **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0061 - 0061 *

Article 34

(ex Article 28 TEC)

Quantitative restrictions on imports and all measures having equivalent effect shall be prohibited between Member States.

--------------------------------------------------
§ 1280.32 Appealing a ban from NARA facilities or property. ( a ) Within 30 calendar days after you receive notice that you have been banned from a NARA facility or property, you may appeal the decision in writing by mail to the Deputy Archivist of the United States (address: National Archives and Records Administration (ND); 8601 Adelphi Road; College Park, MD 20740-6001). In the request, you must state the reasons for the appeal.
( b ) The Deputy Archivist has 30 calendar days after receiving the appeal to make a decision to rescind, modify, or uphold the ban, and will notify you of the decision in writing.
( c ) If the Deputy Archivist upholds the ban, we will not consider another appeal from you within one year from the date of your last request for reconsideration. After one year has passed, you may submit another appeal and the same process will apply.
Exhibit 12.01

CEO CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

I, Dick
Boer, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Koninklijke Ahold N.V.;
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 2, 2016

/s/ Dick Boer

Name: Dick Boer

Title: Chief Executive Officer
### Adams, Kevin (OST) From: 

### Sent: To:



### Cc: 

### Subject: Attachments: Hi, Adams, Kevin (OST) Friday, May 10, 2013 11:48 AM Adak, City Clerk; Adak, City Manager, Layton Lockett, 2012; Agafon Krukoff; Aleut Corp. Exec. Secetary, Angela Bourdukofsky; 'Andilea Weaver'; Glenn Muilenburg (Gienn.Muilenburg@dhs.gov); Larry Mayes (LMayes@AK.Net); 'Mary Nelson'; 'Mike Eichoff'; TinyAviationent@live.com Alaska DOT, Steven D. Hatter; Alaska DOT, Richard Sewell; Alaska DOT, Linda Bustamante ; Sinick, Marshall S. (Marshaii.Sinick@squiresanders.com); Devany, Dennis (OST) Request for Comments at Adak, Alaska Proposal ofAlaska Airlines.pdf

Attached above is a copy ofthe single timely-filed proposal for Essential AirService (EAS) at Adak, submitted by Alaska Airlines. We are currently reviewingthat proposal. The attached proposal is directlyfrom the carrier and will soon be reflected in the Docket, which you may access through Regualtions.gov at DOT-OST-2000-8556, along with other pertinent information on this proceeding. The next step in the carrier-selection process is for us to receive communitycomments, acritically importantelement in our carrier-selection decision, especiallythe comments ofcivic officials. Ialreadytalked informallyto Mr. Layton Lockett, Adak's City Manager. He indicated that iftherewas only one carrier submitting a bid and ifthat carrier were Alaska Airlines, the communitywould be pleased to submit its comments within ten days of receiving that proposal, ratherthan the 30 days typically provided. Accordingly, Iask thateveryone get back to us, preferably by email, no laterthan May21, 2013. We will docketthis email, as well as any replies. In brief, look atthe proposals, and ifyou have any questions, call me, and get back to us by the deadline, May 21. Best,
Kevin Adams 202-366-1047

1
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

     We have issued our report dated February 20, 2008, accompanying the
consolidated financial statements and schedules and management's assessment of
the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting (which report
expressed an unqualified opinion and contains an explanatory paragraph relating
to the adoption of Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes- an Interpretation of FASB Statement
No. 109) included in the Annual Report of SPSS Inc. and subsidiaries on Form 10-
K for the year ended December 31, 2007. We hereby consent to the incorporation
by reference of said report in the Registration Statements of SPSS Inc. on Forms
S-3 (Nos. 333-133378, 333-41207, 333-21025, 333-10423, 333-30460, 333-71236,
333-108048 and 333-143802) and on Forms S-8 (Nos. 333-133587, 333-90694, 333-
87374, 333-57168, 333-45900, 333-25869, 33-73130, 33-80799, 33-73120, 333-63167,
33-74402, 333-75674, 333-108663, 333-120066 and 333-125824).

                                               /s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP

Chicago, Illinois
February 20, 2008
# EUR-Lex - 12006E166 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12006E166

**Treaty establishing the European Community (consolidated version) - Part Three - Community policies - TITLE XVIII - Research and technological development - Article 166 **

*
Official Journal C 321 E , 29/12/2006 P. 0121 - 0122 Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0106 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0252 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0051 - Consolidated version *

Article 166

1. A multiannual framework programme, setting out all the activities of the Community, shall be adopted by the Council, acting in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 251 after consulting the Economic and Social Committee.

The framework programme shall:

- establish the scientific and technological objectives to be achieved by the activities provided for in Article 164 and fix the relevant priorities,

- indicate the broad lines of such activities,

- fix the maximum overall amount and the detailed rules for Community financial participation in the framework programme and the respective shares in each of the activities provided for.

2. The framework programme shall be adapted or supplemented as the situation changes.

3. The framework programme shall be implemented through specific programmes developed within each activity. Each specific programme shall define the detailed rules for implementing it, fix its duration and provide for the means deemed necessary. The sum of the amounts deemed necessary, fixed in the specific programmes, may not exceed the overall maximum amount fixed for the framework programme and each activity.

4. The Council, acting by a qualified majority on a proposal from the Commission and after consulting the European Parliament and the Economic and Social Committee, shall adopt the specific programmes.

--------------------------------------------------
#### § 260.17 Record of filing time.

A record showing the date and hour when each application for inspection or for an appeal inspection is received shall be maintained.
Exhibit
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Natural Alternative Products, Inc.,
      (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2006, as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
      I, Ronald Almadova, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of
      the
      Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/
      RONALD ALMADOVA


CHIEF
      EXECUTIVE OFFICER











/s/
      RONALD ALMADOVA


CHIEF
      FINANCIAL OFFICER








DATED:
      November 14, 2006





A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
        to
        the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
        and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
        request.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 5346 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 5346

 To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to establish a minimum 
     Medicaid disproportionate share hospital allotment for States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 19, 2024

   Mr. Barrasso (for himself, Mr. Schatz, Mr. Cramer, and Mr. Welch) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                          Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to establish a minimum 
     Medicaid disproportionate share hospital allotment for States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Delivering Support for Hospitals 
Act'' or the ``DSH Act''.

SEC. 2. MINIMUM MEDICAID DSH ALLOTMENT.

    Section 1923(f)(6) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396r-
4(f)(6)) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
subparagraph:
                    ``(C) Minimum dsh allotment for fiscal years after 
                2024.--
                            ``(i) In general.--Notwithstanding the 
                        table set forth in paragraph (2) or the 
                        reductions required under paragraph (7), for 
                        fiscal year 2025 and each succeeding fiscal 
                        year, the DSH allotment for any State shall not 
                        be less than the minimum DSH allotment amount 
                        established for the fiscal year under clause 
                        (ii).
                            ``(ii) Minimum dsh allotment amount.--The 
                        minimum DSH allotment amount established under 
                        this clause--
                                    ``(I) for each of fiscal years 2025 
                                through 2029, shall be equal to 
                                $20,000,000; and
                                    ``(II) for fiscal year 2030 and 
                                each succeeding fiscal year, shall be 
                                equal to the minimum DSH allotment 
                                amount established under this clause 
                                for the preceding fiscal year, subject 
                                to an increase for inflation as 
                                provided in paragraph (3)(A).''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 223.135 Effect of listing. ( a ) Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (b) of this section, purchasers debarred or suspended in accordance with this subpart shall be excluded from bidding on or award of Forest Service timber sale contracts. The Forest Service shall not knowingly solicit or consider bids from, award contracts to, approve a third party agreement with, or renew or otherwise extend, except pursuant to the terms of a contract term adjustment, an existing timber sale contract with these purchasers, unless the Chief of the Forest Service or authorized representative determines, in writing, that there is a compelling reason for such action.
( b ) In addition to the provisions of paragraph (a) of this section, persons debarred pursuant to § 223.137(g) shall be prohibited from entering into any contract to purchase unprocessed timber from Federal lands and shall also be precluded from taking delivery of Federal timber purchased by another person for the period of debarment.
[60 FR 46921, Sept. 8, 1995]