alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         739,370
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,664,834
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,487,028
<PP&E>                                      99,798,961
<DEPRECIATION>                              51,503,495
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              53,188,337
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,564,630
<BONDS>                                      4,386,234
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  46,959,473
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                53,188,337
<SALES>                                     14,078,491
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            14,557,405
<CGS>                                        2,192,349
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               10,098,619
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               240,932
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             262,659
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,217,854
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (10,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 4,227,854
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .65
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
# EUR-Lex - 12004V321 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V321

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART III — THE POLICIES AND FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - TITLE V — THE UNION'S EXTERNAL ACTION - CHAPTER IV — COOPERATION WITH THIRD COUNTRIES AND HUMANITARIAN AID - Section 3 — Humanitarian aid - Article III-321 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0145 - 0145 *

Article III-321

1. The Union's operations in the field of humanitarian aid shall be conducted within the framework of the principles and objectives of the external action of the Union. Such operations shall be intended to provide ad hoc assistance and relief and protection for people in third countries who are victims of natural or man-made disasters, in order to meet the humanitarian needs resulting from these different situations. The Union's operations and those of the Member States shall complement and reinforce each other.

2. Humanitarian aid operations shall be conducted in compliance with the principles of international law and with the principles of impartiality, neutrality and non-discrimination.

3. European laws or framework laws shall establish the measures defining the framework within which the Union's humanitarian aid operations shall be implemented.

4. The Union may conclude with third countries and competent international organisations any agreement helping to achieve the objectives referred to in paragraph 1 and in Article III-292.

The first subparagraph shall be without prejudice to Member States' competence to negotiate in international bodies and to conclude agreements.

5. In order to establish a framework for joint contributions from young Europeans to the humanitarian aid operations of the Union, a European Voluntary Humanitarian Aid Corps shall be set up. European laws shall determine the rules and procedures for the operation of the Corps.

6. The Commission may take any useful initiative to promote coordination between actions of the Union and those of the Member States, in order to enhance the efficiency and complementarity of Union and national humanitarian aid measures.

7. The Union shall ensure that its humanitarian aid operations are coordinated and consistent with those of international organisations and bodies, in particular those forming part of the United Nations system.

--------------------------------------------------
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 529 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to require the impaneling of a 

new jury if a jury fails to recommend by unanimous vote a sentence 

for conviction of a crime punishable by death. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 27, 2023 

Mr. CRUZ (for himself, Mr. COTTON, and Mr. BRAUN) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the 

Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to require the 

impaneling of a new jury if a jury fails to recommend 

by unanimous vote a sentence for conviction of a crime 

punishable by death. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as ‘‘Eric’s Law’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 529 IS

1 SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT TO IMPANEL A NEW JURY IN CER2 TAIN CASES. 

3 (a) ADDITIONAL GROUND FOR IMPANELING JURY.— 

4 Section 3593(b)(2) of title 18, United States Code, is 

5 amended— 

6 (1) in subparagraph (C), by striking ‘‘or’’ at 

7 the end; and 

8 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

9 ‘‘(E) a new special hearing is required pur10 suant to subsection (g); or’’. 

11 (b) IMPANELING OF NEW JURY WHEN JURY DOES

12 NOT REACH A UNANIMOUS RECOMMENDATION.—Section 

13 3593 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by add14 ing at the end the following: 

15 ‘‘(g) SPECIAL RULE WHEN JURY DOES NOT RE16 TURN A UNANIMOUS RECOMMENDATION.— 

17 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—If a jury described in sub18 section (b)(1) or subparagraphs (A) through (D) of 

19 subsection (b)(2) does not, by unanimous vote, make 

20 a recommendation whether the defendant should be 

21 sentenced to death, to life imprisonment without 

22 possibility of release, or some other lesser sentence 

23 pursuant to subsection (e), the court, upon motion 

24 of the attorney for the government, shall order a 

25 new special hearing and impanel a new jury pursu26 ant to subsection (b). 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•S 529 IS

1 ‘‘(2) IMPOSITION OF SENTENCE.—If the jury 

2 impaneled pursuant to paragraph (1) does not reach 

3 a unanimous recommendation as to sentence, the 

4 court shall impose a sentence other than death au5 thorized by law.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
##### 



Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Phillip Miller, certify that: I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Immediatek, Inc.;
Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report; Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rule 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:
designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidating
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report was prepared;
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report (the
Evaluation Date); and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on the required evaluation as of
the Evaluation Date; The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee
of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function): all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and
The registrants other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. Date: November 15, 2004 /s/ Phillip MillerPhillip Miller,  Chief Financial Officer(Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)
Order filed December 6, 2011.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-04-01035-CV

____________

JAMES B. MADDUX AND GMS ENERGY SERVICES, L.P. AND 

STAR TAX SOLUTIONS, L.L.C., Appellants

V.

TRINITY PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS, LTD. AND 

TPC INVESTMENTS, INC., Appellees

On Appeal from the 61st District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 01-35125

O R D E R

On June 25, 2009, this court abated this appeal because appellant, GMS Energy 

Services, L.P., petitioned for voluntary bankruptcy in the United States Bankruptcy Court 

for the Southern District of Texas, under cause number 05-33342. See Tex. R. App. P.

8.2. 
2

Through the Public Access to Court Electronic Records (PACER) system, the court 

learned the bankruptcy case was closed on May 18, 2011. The parties failed to advise this 

court of the bankruptcy court action.

On September 27, 2011, we advised the parties that unless, within 20 days, any 

party to the appeal filed a motion demonstrating good cause to retain this appeal, the appeal 

would be reinstated and dismissed for want of prosecution.

On October 18, 2011, appellants requested an extension of time to file a response. 

The motion was granted and appellants’ response was due on or before October 27, 2011. 

As of this date, no response has been filed.

Accordingly, unless within 10 days of the date of this order, any party to the 

appeal files a motion demonstrating good cause to retain this appeal, this appeal will be 

reinstated and dismissed for want of prosecution.

PER CURIAM
###### Editorial Note on Part 622

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 622 appear at 79 FR 57837, Sept. 26, 2014 and at 81 FR 32253, May 23, 2016.

#### § 622.507 [Reserved]
Law Office of 

James C. Thomas III 

7S09 NW Tifiimy Spnii|;s Paikway, Suite 300 

Kansas City, Missouri 641S3 

Phone: (816) SS4-9393; Fax: (816) 584-9394 

James@jet3law.eoni 

March 20,2015 

EMAIL - fliamDton@fec.gov ro 

Zn Federal Election Comxnission 3= om 

(^ce of Caxt^laints Examination ^ 

and Legal Administration 5'**'^ 

Attn: Franlde Hampton, Paralegal r"' S?r'--

SO*' 999EStreet,NW 5?. S 

Wellington, D.C. 20436 o < 

II O ! 

JRe: Now or Never PAC (Matter Number: MUR6920) 

Dear Ms. Hampton: 

I am the trcasurer of Now or Never PAC, an independent expenditure only committee 

fonned in. 2012 (the "Committee'O. This letter is in response to your letter which forwarded a 

complaint dated February 27,2014 (probably a typo) with an FiEC '^received" stamp dated 

February 27,2015 (the "Complaint"). The Complaint was filed by Citizens for.Re^nsibi1ity 

and Etiiics in Wasbihgtoa Yourletter forwarding tlie Complaint was received on March 9, 

2015. 

Your letter states tiiat the Committee and I have fifteen (15) days fiom receipt of your 

letter to submit a wiittexi response to the Complaint. This would ^ear to make the deadline for 

responding to the Complaint March 24,2015. 

One component of my law practice is that I help clients with tax issues, including filing 

tax returns for certain clients. During tiie last two weelm I have been extremely busy meeting 

various tax fiding deadlines and other client demands and have not had time to review the 

Complaint in detail. To allowme the opportuniQ' to gather all the relevant facts and present an 

appropriate response, I respectfully request that the Committee md I be granted until Friihty, 

April 24,2015, to provide a written response to the Complaint 

JCT3/pb
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
Required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350  (as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ DARIN DIVINIADarin DiviniaChief Executive Officer and President (Principal
Executive Officer and 
Principal Financial Officer)
# EUR-Lex - 11985I162 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11985I162

**DOCUMENTS CONCERNING THE ACCESSION OF THE KINGDOM OF SPAIN AND THE PORTUGUESE REPUBLIC TO THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, ACT CONCERNING THE CONDITIONS OF ACCESSION OF THE KINGDOM OF SPAIN AND THE PORTUGUESE REPUBLIC AND THE ADJUSTMENTS TO THE TREATIES, ARTICLE 162 **

*
Official Journal L 302 , 15/11/1985 P. 0072 *

++++

Article 162

Before 31 December 1992 , the Commission shall submit to the Council a report concerning the situation and prospects with regard to fishing in the Community on the basis of the application of Articles 158 and 161 . On the basis of that report , the adjustments to the arrangement provided for in Article 158 , the first subparagraph of Article 159 ( 2 ) and in Article 161 ( 1 ) , ( 2 ) and ( 3 ) which prove to be necessary , including those concerning access to zones other than those mentioned in Article 158 ( 1 ) , shall be adopted before 31 December 1993 in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 43 of the EEC Treaty and shall take effect on 1 January 1996 .
[Civ. No. 1469.

First Appellate District.

April 2, 1915.]

#### SAN FRANCISCO COMMERCIAL AGENCY, Respondent, v. NEAL J. McKEON et al., Appellants.

Action' Against Garnishee—Pleading—Sufficiency of Complaint.— In the absence of a special demurrer, a complaint against a garnishee which alleges that on a certain date defendants became indebted to plaintiff in a specified amount by virtue of a certain writ of garnishment being served upon them by the sheriff of a named county in a certain designated action, sufficiently states a cause of action.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County. William S. Wells, Judge.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

H. M. Anthony, and Herbert S. Goold, for Appellants.

Perry & Perry, for Respondent.

THE COURT.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff and against the defendants brought to this court upon the judgment-roll.

The sole point presented for determination is as to whether or not the trial court, in overruling the defendants’ general demurrer to the complaint committed error.

The complaint alleges that “On the 14th day of February, 1913, defendants became indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of $383.90 by virtue of a certain writ of garnishment being served upon said defendants by the sheriff of the county of Alameda” in that certain action “in which the San Francisco Commercial Agency was the plaintiff, and one Margaret Hall the defendant.” <

*157The statute on the subject, it is true, in the case of a garnishment requires that the sheriff in executing the writ shall not only leave a copy of the writ with the person owing the debt to the defendant, but also a notice that the debt owing by him to the defendant is attached in pursuance of such writ. But we think the complaint, in the absence of a special demurrer, states sufficient facts to constitute a cause of action; and it was so held in the recent case of *Midway Five Oil Co.*v. *Citizens Nat. Bank of Los Angeles,*25 Cal. App. 366, [143 Pac. 800].

Judgment affirmed.
# EUR-Lex - 11994N/PRO/02 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11994N/PRO/02

**ACT concerning the conditions of accession of the Kingdom of Norway, the Republic of Austria, the Republic of Finland and the Kingdom of Sweden and the adjustments to the Treaties on which the European Union is founded, Protocol No 2 - on the Åland islands **

*
Official Journal C 241 , 29/08/1994 P. 0352 *

Protocol No 2

on the AAland islands

Taking into account the special status that the AAland islands enjoy under international law, the Treaties on which the European Union is founded shall apply to the AAland islands with the following derogations:

Article 1

The provisions of the EC Treaty shall not preclude the application of the existing provisions in force on 1 January 1994 on the AAland islands on:

- restrictions, on a non-discriminatory basis, on the right of natural persons who do not enjoy hembygdsraett/kotiseutuoikeus (regional citizenship) in AAland, and for legal persons, to acquire and hold real property on the AAland islands without permission by the competent authorities of the AAland islands;

- restrictions, on a non-discriminatory basis, on the right of establishment and the right to provide services by natural persons who do not enjoy hembygdsraett/kotiseutuoikeus (regional citizenship) in AAland, or by legal persons without permission by the competent authorities of the AAland islands.

Article 2

(a) The territory of the AAland islands - being considered as a third territory, as defined in Article 3 (1) third indent of Council Directive 77/388/EEC as amended, and as a national territory falling outside the field of application of the excise harmonization directives as defined in Article 2 of Council Directive 92/12/EEC - shall be excluded from the territorial application of the EC provisions in the fields of harmonization of the laws of the Member States on turnover taxes and on excise duties and other forms of indirect taxation. This exemption shall not have any effect on the Community's own resources.

This paragraph shall not apply to the provisions of Council Directive 69/335/EEC, as amended, relating to capital duty.

(b) This derogation is aimed at maintaining a viable local economy in the islands and shall not have any negative effects on the interests of the Union nor on its common policies. If the Commission considers that the provisions in paragraph (a) are no longer justified, particularly in terms of fair competition or own resources, it shall submit appropriate proposals to the Council, which shall act in accordance with the pertinent articles of the EC Treaty.

Article 3

The Republic of Finland shall ensure that the same treatment applies to all natural and legal persons of the Member States in the AAland islands.
#### § 13.1406 State lands.

The National Park Service administers certain state-owned lands and waters within the boundary of Klondike Gold Rush National Historical Park under a memorandum of understanding with the State of Alaska. The prohibition on carrying, possession, and use of weapons, traps, and nets in this chapter does not apply to the lawful taking of wildlife on these State-owned lands and waters.
MUR809100035
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

Washington, DC 

 February 9, 2024 

By EMAIL & U.S. MAIL

jlopez@elias.law

zmorrison@elias.law

Jacquelyn Lopez, Esquire 

Zachary Morrison, Esquire 

Elias Law Group LLP

250 Mass. Ave., N.W. 

Suite 400 

Washington, DC 20002 

 RE: MUR 8075 

 People for Patty Murray and 

Jay Petterson in his official capacity as 

treasurer

 

Dear Counsel: 

On October 5, 2022, the Federal Election Commission (the “Commission”) received 

information in the normal course of its supervisory responsibilities indicating that your client, 

People for Patty Murray and Jay Petterson in his official capacity as treasurer, may have violated 

the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended. On October 11, 2022, your client was 

notified of this information and provided an opportunity to respond. 

This is to inform you that on February 7, 2024, the Commission decided not to open a 

Matter Under Review and closed the file. 

 If you have any questions, please contact me at (202) 694-1210 or ksealls@fec.gov. 

 Sincerely, 

 Kenneth E. Sealls

 Attorney 

MUR807500038
September 4, 2012

U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

Docket No. FAA-2000-7980

West Building Ground Floor Room W12-140

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Washington, DC 20591-0001

Re: Exemption No. 5533, as amended; Docket FAA-2000-7980

Ladies/Gentlemen:

In accordance with Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations (14CFR) § 11.61(b), 

the Air Transport Association of America (ATA), on behalf of its member airlines1

and other similarly situated Part 121 certificate holders, petitions the Administrator 

for an extension of Exemption No. 5533I, Docket No. FAA-2000-7980. This 

exemption is scheduled to expire on October 31, 2012.

Exemption 5533I provides relief from 14 CFR § 121.311(b) to allow the member 

airlines of the Air Transport Association and other similarly situated Part 121 air 

carriers to permit qualified flight attendants not required by §121.391(c) to perform 

duties related to the safety of the airplane and its occupants during aircraft 

movement on the surface.

This request does not seek to change the conditions and limitations of the current 

exemption.

The conditions and circumstances, with regard to public interest and equivalent 

levels of safety, which warranted the original partial grant of exemption, continue to 

exist. This exemption has been in use for thirteen years with no known compromise 

of safety.

1 ATA is doing business as “Airlines for America.” Operator Members Include:

Alaska Airlines, American Airlines, Atlas Air, Continental Airlines, Delta Air Lines, FedEx Corporation, 

Hawaiian Airlines JetBlue Airways, Southwest Airlines, United Airlines, United Parcel Service, Co., US 

Airways. Air Canada is an associate member.
U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Management System

Docket No. FAA-2000-7980

September 4, 2012

Page 2

The renewal of this exemption is not a controversial issue. This petition does not 

seek to establish a precedent, but merely would continue an accepted and established 

practice. Accordingly, ATA requests that publication and comment period be waived.

(14 CFR §11.87).

A summary of this partition as required by 14 CFR §11.81 is attached.

If any further information or discussion is required, please call me at (202) 626 

4012.

Sincerely,

/S/

 Paul W. Railsback

 Director of Operations

Air Transport Association

1302 Pennsylvania Avenue NW

Suite 1100

Washington, DC 20004

202 626-4012

Attachments (1)
U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Management System

Docket No. FAA-2000-7980

September 4, 2012

Attachment

SUMMARY OF ATA PETITION

The Air Transport Association petitions on behalf of its member airlines and other 

similarly situated Part 121 operators for an extension of Exemption No. 5533I. This 

exemption provides relief from Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, §121.311(b), to 

the extent necessary to permit non-required flight attendants to perform safetyrelated duties during aircraft surface movement.