alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       2,519,940
<SECURITIES>                                   156,573
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,003,111
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,679,624
<PP&E>                                      16,828,979
<DEPRECIATION>                               8,365,735
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,142,868
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          252,554
<BONDS>                                      4,401,753
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,488,561
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,142,868
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,429,306
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,466,809
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             387,553
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,574,944
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,574,944
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,574,944
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
DRAFT

4. Final Invoice for MA? (Completed by DSU) 7. MA Start Date 8. MA End Date 9. Invoice Start Date 10. Invoice End Date

 $ - 

 Type (airfare, train, rental car, etc.) Cost 

 $ - 

 $ - 

 Type (hotel, volunteer housing, etc.) Cost 

 Cost 

 $ - 

 $ - 

Type (groceries; restaurant; vol. housing,etc) Cost 

 Cost 

 $ - 

 $ - 

 Type (laundromat charges, etc.) Cost 

 Cost 

 $ - 

 Type (tolls, parking, gas, luggage fees, etc.) Cost 

 $ - 

 $ - 

 $ - 

 Subtotal-Laundry 

 e. Other Travel 

CNCS Disaster Deployment Reimbursement Request 

 Supplies 

 Cost 

 Total Travel 

Personnel

 Total Personnel 

CNCS-Disaster Services Unit, Updated 05/14

 Subtotal-Transportation 

 Subtotal-Lodging 

 Subtotal-Other Travel 

 Type (Lost FFS for AmeriCorps members, Staff OT, etc.). Please include 

formula(s) for any personnel costs: 

 Subtotal-Food 

 d. Laundry 

Disaster Services Unit:

CFO Office:

Office of Grants Management:

 Description 

 Total Supplies 

 Total Equipment 

 Total Other 

 Total Reimbursement Request 

 CNCS Approvals: Sign and Date

 Other Miscellaneous Expenses 

 Other Operating Expenses 

 Description (Phone costs, fuel for equipment, etc.) 

2. Point of Contact (Name, Email, Phone)

 c. Subsistence 

Travel

Directions: Please complete with actual allowable costs incurred. Include detail and rates were applicable. If entering more items than the provided lines in any section, use the Additional 

Breakdown sheet provided and transfer the total to the appropriate section. Please note that there are formulas built into the sheet to compute the total automatically.

a. Transportation

 b. Lodging (Include rate/# members/days) 

3. Type of Activity and Location Served:

 Description (PPE, approved tools, etc.) 

1. Program Name: 

5. DSU Tracking Number (Completed by DSU) 6. Mission Assignment Number:

Yes No
 DRAFT 

Program:

Mission Assignment Number:

Invoice Dates:

Type (airfare, train, rental car, etc.) Cost 

Subtotal-Transportation $ - 

Type (hotel, volunteer facility, etc.) Cost 

Subtotal-Lodging $ - 

Type (groceries/self-prepared; restaurant; volunteer facility) Cost 

Subtotal-Food $ - 

Type (Laundromat charges, etc.) Cost 

Subtotal-Laundry $ - 

Type (Tolls, Parking, etc.) Cost 

Subtotal-Other Travel $ - 

 $ - 

Travel

Transportation

Other Travel

Lodging (Include rate/# members/days)

Subsistence

CNCS Disaster Deployment Reimbursement Request: Additional Breakdown

TOTAL TRAVEL

Laundry

CNCS-Disaster Services Unit Additional Breakdown 1 of 2
 DRAFT 

 Type (Lost FFS for AmeriCorps members, Staff OT, etc.). Cost 

 $ - 

Description and Quantity (PPE, approved tools, etc.) Cost 

 $ - 

Description and Quantity (Phone costs, fuel for equipment, 

etc.) Cost 

 $ - 

Description and Quantity Cost 

 $ - 

 $ - 

TOTAL OTHER

TOTAL Reimbursement

Other Miscellaneous Expenses

Reminder: MA covers only additional personnel costs incurred outside of normal spending. Please include formula(s) for 

any personnel costs:

TOTAL EQUIPMENT

Personnel

Supplies

Other Operating Expenses

TOTAL PERSONNEL

TOTAL SUPPLIES

CNCS-Disaster Services Unit Additional Breakdown 2 of 2
- WV 2016 2
- WV 2016
**EXHIBIT 32.2****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**In connection with the Quarterly Report of EUPA International Corporation (the “Corporation”) onForm 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kun-Chieh Huang, Chief Financial Officer of theCorporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.       /s/ Kung-Chieh Huang Kung-Chieh Huang    Chief Financial Officer  November 7, 2006
20
INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT

PMN: 15-0382 

Focus Ready Draft 4/20/2015

ENGINEER: El-Zoobi \ JAS 

SUBMITTER: Itaconix Corp 

 

 

 

 

 
 

 

 

 

 

SAT (concerns) (04/14/2015):

Analogs: 

Related Cases and Misc SAT Info: 

Migration to groundwater: Slow 

PBT rating: P1B1T1 

Health: 1-2 Dermal, Inhalation 

Eco: 3 Water (All releases to water with a CC = 4 ppb) 
OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 1-2B

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS: 

Generated by the 09/30/2013 version of ChemSTEER. 

 
INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT

PMN: 15-0382 

 

 

 

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT

PMN: 15-0382 

 

 

 

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below may coincide 

with daily releases from the other sources to the same medium.
# EUR-Lex - 12008E234 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008E234

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - PART SIX: INSTITUTIONAL AND FINANCIAL PROVISIONS - TITLE I: INSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS - Chapter 1: The institutions - Section 1: The European Parliament - Article 234 (ex Article 201 TEC) **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0152 - 0152 *

Article 234

(ex Article 201 TEC)

If a motion of censure on the activities of the Commission is tabled before it, the European Parliament shall not vote thereon until at least three days after the motion has been tabled and only by open vote.

If the motion of censure is carried by a two-thirds majority of the votes cast, representing a majority of the component Members of the European Parliament, the members of the Commission shall resign as a body and the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy shall resign from duties that he or she carries out in the Commission. They shall remain in office and continue to deal with current business until they are replaced in accordance with Article 17 of the Treaty on European Union. In this case, the term of office of the members of the Commission appointed to replace them shall expire on the date on which the term of office of the members of the Commission obliged to resign as a body would have expired.

--------------------------------------------------
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 31, 2018

No. 04-18-00329-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF S.I., ET AL., CHILDREN,

From the 37th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017-PA-01391

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

This is an accelerated appeal of the trial court’s order terminating appellant’s parental 

rights. The appellant’s brief was originally due to be filed on June 27, 2018. 

By order dated June 28, 2018, this court granted appellant’s first motion for extension of 

time to his file his brief, extending the deadline to July 17, 2017. This court’s order reminded 

appellant’s attorney that this appeal is governed by the standards set forth in Rule 6.2 of the 

Texas Rules of Judicial Administration and must be brought to final disposition within 180 days 

of the date the notice of appeal is filed. TEX. R. JUD. ADMIN. 6.2. As a result, this court’s order 

stated, “Given the time constraints governing the disposition of this appeal, further requests for 

extensions of time will be disfavored.”

On July 17, 2018, appellant’s attorney filed a second motion for extension of time. The 

reasons for requesting the extension, which were identical to the reasons stated in the first 

motion, were a “recent” hurricane which required appellant’s attorney to travel to Rockport, 

Texas to protect and repair property and “back to back trials.” Although the motion was the 

second request for an extension of time, the motion stated it was the “first” request for an 

extension of time. By order dated July 19, 2018, this court granted the motion in part, extending 

the deadline to file appellant’s brief to July 27, 2017. This court’s order stated, “NO 

FURTHER EXTENSIONS OF TIME WILL BE GRANTED ABSENT EXTENUATING 

CIRCUMSTANCES.”

On July 30, 2018, appellant’s attorney filed a third motion for extension of time. The 

reasons for requesting the extension are identical to the reasons stated in the first two motions 

including a “recent” hurricane which required appellant’s attorney to travel to Rockport, Texas to 

protect and repair property and “back to back trials.” Although the motion is the third request for 

an extension of time, the motion states it is the “first” request for an extension of time. The 

motion does not acknowledge this court’s prior order or attempt to provide any “extenuating 

circumstances.” Nevertheless, in the interest of justice for appellant, the motion is GRANTED. 
Appellant’s brief must be filed in this court no later than August 6, 2018. IF APPELLANT’S 

BRIEF IS NOT FILED IN THIS COURT ON AUGUST 6, 2018, THIS APPEAL WILL BE 

ABATED TO THE TRIAL COURT, AND THE TRIAL COURT WILL BE 

INSTRUCTED TO CONSIDER WHETHER SANCTIONS SHOULD BE ASSESSED 

AGAINST APPELLANT’S ATTORNEY, MR. JOSEPH BOHAC, FOR DISREGARDING 

THIS COURT’S ORDERS.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 31st day of July, 2018.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
July 20, 2015

Mr. Joshua W. Bell

738 East 2600 North

North Ogden, UT 84414

Dear Mr. Bell:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from 

§§ 61.113(a) and (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) and

(a)(2), and 91.417(a) and (b) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains 

why we cannot process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Cannot Process Your Request

We entered your May 19, 2015, exemption request into the public docket 

(No. FAA−2015−1713), but we are unable to process your request any further. The 

information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For 

us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.
2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
3
Presidential Documents

59359 

Federal Register 

Vol. 71, No. 194 

Friday, October 6, 2006 

Title 3— 

The President 

Proclamation 8062 of October 4, 2006 

Fire Prevention Week, 2006 

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation 

During Fire Prevention Week, we underscore our commitment to advancing 

fire safety and awareness, and we honor the brave firefighters and volunteers 

who work to protect our lives, homes, and communities. 

Thousands of injuries and deaths occur each year as a result of fires, and 

Americans have a shared responsibility to help minimize the risk of fires 

that can cause harm to people and property. By installing and maintaining 

smoke alarms and having a plan of action in the event of an emergency, 

citizens can practice simple but effective fire safety measures. Unattended 

cooking is a leading cause of household fires, and this year’s theme, ‘‘Prevent 

Cooking Fires: Watch What You Heat,’’ highlights the importance of practicing kitchen safety at all times. By keeping cooking areas clear of flammable 

items and closely monitoring children and appliances while in the kitchen, 

individuals can greatly reduce the number of fire-related accidents in the 

home. 

Our Nation’s firefighters selflessly risk their lives to protect their fellow 

citizens. These brave men and women play a critical role in safeguarding 

our families, our households, and our communities, and their courage and 

dedication are an inspiration to all Americans. Fire Prevention Week is 

an opportunity to reaffirm the importance of fire safety, celebrate those 

who devote their lives to protecting others, and honor the memory of our 

Nation’s fallen heroes. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States 

of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution 

and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim October 8 through October 

14, 2006, as Fire Prevention Week. On Sunday, October 8, 2006, in accordance with Public Law 107–51, the flag of the United States will be flown 

at half-staff on all Federal office buildings in honor of the National Fallen 

Firefighters Memorial Service. I call on all Americans to participate in 

this observance through appropriate programs and activities and by renewing 

their efforts to prevent fires and their tragic consequences. 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSAL
59360 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 194 / Friday, October 6, 2006 / Presidential Documents 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this fourth day 

of October, in the year of our Lord two thousand six, and of the Independence 

of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-first. 

[FR Doc. 06–8593 

Filed 10–5–06; 11:07 am] 

Billing code 3195–01–P 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALGWBOLD.EPS</GPH>
Case 16-28870 Doc 1-1 Filed 09/09/16 Entered 09/09/16 10:57:09 Desc correct

 PDF Page 1 of 10
Case 16-28870 Doc 1-1 Filed 09/09/16 Entered 09/09/16 10:57:09 Desc correct

 PDF Page 2 of 10
Case 16-28870 Doc 1-1 Filed 09/09/16 Entered 09/09/16 10:57:09 Desc correct

 PDF Page 3 of 10
Case 16-28870 Doc 1-1 Filed 09/09/16 Entered 09/09/16 10:57:09 Desc correct

 PDF Page 4 of 10
Case 16-28870 Doc 1-1 Filed 09/09/16 Entered 09/09/16 10:57:09 Desc correct

 PDF Page 5 of 10
Case 16-28870 Doc 1-1 Filed 09/09/16 Entered 09/09/16 10:57:09 Desc correct

 PDF Page 6 of 10
Case 16-28870 Doc 1-1 Filed 09/09/16 Entered 09/09/16 10:57:09 Desc correct

 PDF Page 7 of 10
Case 16-28870 Doc 1-1 Filed 09/09/16 Entered 09/09/16 10:57:09 Desc correct

 PDF Page 8 of 10
Case 16-28870 Doc 1-1 Filed 09/09/16 Entered 09/09/16 10:57:09 Desc correct

 PDF Page 9 of 10
Case 16-28870 Doc 1-1 Filed 09/09/16 Entered 09/09/16 10:57:09 Desc correct

 PDF Page 10 of 10
§ 13.320 Preference to Cook Inlet Region, Incorporated. ( a ) The Cook Inlet Region, Incorporated (CIRI), in cooperation with village corporations within the Cook Inlet region when appropriate, will have a right of first refusal to provide new visitor services within that portion of Lake Clark National Park and Preserve that is within the boundaries of the Cook Inlet region. In order to exercise this right of first refusal, the National Park Service will publicly solicit competitive offers for the visitor services authorization pursuant to 36 CFR part 51 or other applicable National Park Service procedures. CIRI must submit a responsive offer within 90 days of such solicitation. If CIRI makes such an offer and is determined by the Director to be capable of carrying out the terms and conditions of the visitor services authorization, it will receive the authorization. If it does not, the authorization may be awarded to another person pursuant to usual National Park Service policies and procedures if otherwise appropriate.
( b ) The CIRI right of first refusal will have precedence over the rights of preferred operators. An offer from CIRI under this section, if the offer is in the form of a joint venture, will not be considered valid unless it demonstrates to the satisfaction of the Director that CIRI has a controlling interest in the joint venture.
( c ) The CIRI right of first refusal may not be sold, transferred, devised or assigned, directly or indirectly.
###### Editorial Note on Part 648

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 648 appear at 62 FR 14651, Mar. 27, 1997.

#### § 648.234 Gear restrictions. [Reserved]
#### §§ 1208.112-1208.129 [Reserved]
| **Back to CPC Books**
**Go to Contents****Know Thy Enemy:****Profiles of Adversary Leaders and Their Strategic Cultures**Barry R. SchneiderJerrold M. PostEditors
July 2003(2nd Edition)**USAF Counterproliferation Center**Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 99.1

                           PERSISTENCE SOFTWARE, INC.

                            CERTIFICATION PRUSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Persistence Software, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Christopher T. Keene, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/ CHRISTOPHER T. KEENE
------------------------
Christopher T. Keene
Chief Executive Officer
May 15, 2003
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-2539

ROBERT WALTER WOLTZ,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

SHIRLEY S. CHATER, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Walter E. Black, Jr., Senior District

Judge. (CA-94-3599-B)

Submitted: January 11, 1996 Decided: January 23, 1996

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Walter Woltz, Appellant Pro Se. Lynne Ann Battaglia, United

States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland; Claire S. Hoffman, SOCIAL

SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing

his case for want of prosecution and for failing to keep the court

informed of his change in address. We have reviewed the record and

the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Woltz v.

Chater, No. CA-95-3599-B (D. Md. May 4, 1995). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed August 9, 2016.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-16-00561-CR

ROME BOUGERE, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 185th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1398117

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant entered a plea of guilty to attempted burglary of a habitation. On 

August 23, 2013, in accordance with the terms of a plea bargain agreement with 

the State, the trial court deferred a finding of guilt, placed appellant on community 

supervision for four years and assessed a $300 fine. The State subsequently moved 

to adjudicate appellant’s guilt. Appellant entered a plea of true to the allegations in 

the motion. As part of an agreement with the State on punishment, appellant signed 

a written waiver of his right to appeal. On November 25, 2013, the trial court 
2

sentenced appellant to confinement for three years in the Institutional Division of 

the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. Appellant’s notice of appeal was not 

filed until July 6, 2016.

A defendant’s notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days after sentence is 

imposed when the defendant has not filed a motion for new trial. See Tex. R. App.

P. 26.2(a)(1). A notice of appeal that complies with the requirements of Rule 26 is 

essential to vest the court of appeals with jurisdiction. Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 

208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998). If an appeal is not timely perfected, a court of 

appeals does not obtain jurisdiction to address the merits of the appeal. Under 

those circumstances it can take no action other than to dismiss the appeal. Id.

Moreover, the trial court entered a certification of the defendant’s right to 

appeal in which the court certified that this is a plea bargain case, and the 

defendant has no right of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). The trial court’s 

certification is included in the record on appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d). The 

record supports the trial court’s certification. See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 

615 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Busby, Donovan, and Wise.

Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).