alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. Department of Justice

Office of Community Oriented Policing Services

 Fact Sheet www.cops.usdoj.gov

2019 Community Policing Development Program

Community Policing Development (CPD) funds are used to develop the capacity of law enforcement to implement community policing strategies by providing guidance on promising practices through the development and testing of innovative 

strategies; building knowledge about effective practices and outcomes; and supporting new, creative approaches to preventing 

crime and promoting safe communities. The 2019 CPD program funded projects that develop knowledge, increase awareness 

of effective community policing strategies, increase the skills and abilities of law enforcement and community partners, increase 

the number of law enforcement agencies and relevant stakeholders using proven community policing practices, and institutionalize community policing practice in routine business.

COPS Office Community Policing 

Development Awards

The 2019 CPD program funded projects related to the following topic areas:

Building Bridges between Law Enforcement and Youth

Designing a Public and Officer Safety Dashboard

Protecting Youth Through the Implementation of School 

Safety Recommendations

Translating Crime Reduction Best and Emerging Practices 

for Small and Rural Agencies

Innovative Uses of Technology to Address Crime

Emerging Issue Forums

Blue Alert Network Support

Open Category

Invitational Applications

The full listing of awarded projects is located on the COPS 

Office website at https://cops.usdoj.gov/cpd.

Funding Provisions

Provisions include the following:

 In FY 2019, the COPS Office awarded $5.6 million 

under the CPD program.

 The CPD solicitation was open to all public governmental 

agencies, for-profit and nonprofit institutions, institutions 

of higher education, community groups, and faith-based 

organizations. Accepted proposals were responsive to the 

topic selected, significantly advanced the field of community policing, and demonstrated an understanding of 

community policing.

For more information about COPS Office 

programs and resources, please call the COPS 

Office Response Center at 800-421-6770 or visit 

the COPS Office website at www.cops.usdoj.gov.

Contact the COPS Office

October 2019
# EUR-Lex - 12008E299 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008E299

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - PART SIX: INSTITUTIONAL AND FINANCIAL PROVISIONS - TITLE I: INSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS - Chapter 2: Legal acts of the Union, adoption procedures and other provisions - Section 2: Procedures for the adoption of acts and other provisions - Article 299 (ex Article 256 TEC) **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0176 - 0177 *

Article 299

(ex Article 256 TEC)

Acts of the Council, the Commission or the European Central Bank which impose a pecuniary obligation on persons other than States, shall be enforceable.

Enforcement shall be governed by the rules of civil procedure in force in the State in the territory of which it is carried out. The order for its enforcement shall be appended to the decision, without other formality than verification of the authenticity of the decision, by the national authority which the government of each Member State shall designate for this purpose and shall make known to the Commission and to the Court of Justice of the European Union.

When these formalities have been completed on application by the party concerned, the latter may proceed to enforcement in accordance with the national law, by bringing the matter directly before the competent authority.

Enforcement may be suspended only by a decision of the Court. However, the courts of the country concerned shall have jurisdiction over complaints that enforcement is being carried out in an irregular manner.

--------------------------------------------------
# EUR-Lex - 12007L/PRO/A/06 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12007L/PRO/A/06

**Treaty of Lisbon amending the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Community, signed at Lisbon, 13 December 2007 - PROTOCOLS - A. Protocols to be annexed to the Treaty on European Union, to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and, where applicable, to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community - Protocol on the internal market and competition **

*
Official Journal 306 , 17/12/2007 P. 0156 - 0156 *

Protocol

ON THE INTERNAL MARKET AND COMPETITION

THE HIGH CONTRACTING PARTIES,

CONSIDERING that the internal market as set out in Article 2 of the Treaty on European Union includes a system ensuring that competition is not distorted,

HAVE AGREED that:

to this end, the Union shall, if necessary, take action under the provisions of the Treaties, including under Article 308 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

This protocol shall be annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

--------------------------------------------------
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 5284 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 5284

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To increase the penalty for prohibited provision of a phone in a 
             correctional facility, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Lieutenant Osvaldo Albarati Stopping 
Prison Contraband Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITED PROVISION OF A PHONE.

    Section 1791(b) of title 18, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by redesignating paragraphs (4) and (5) as paragraphs 
        (5) and (6), respectively;
            (2) by inserting after paragraph (3) the following:
            ``(4) in the case of a violation of subsection (a)(1), 
        imprisonment for not more than 2 years, or both, if the object 
        is specified in subsection (d)(1)(F) of this section;''; and
            (3) in paragraph (5), as so redesignated, by inserting ``, 
        in the case of a violation of subsection (a)(2),'' before 
        ``(d)(1)(F)''.

SEC. 3. REVIEW OF POLICIES.

    Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the 
Director of the Bureau of Prisons shall--
            (1) conduct a review of the policies of the Bureau of 
        Prisons pertaining to inmates who make, possess, obtain, or 
        attempt to make or obtain a prohibited object, as defined in 
        section 1791(d)(1) of title 18, United States Code; and
            (2) update those policies as needed to improve protections 
        for incarcerated individuals and staff.

            Passed the Senate September 25, 2024.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
118th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 5284

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

   To increase the penalty for prohibited provision of a phone in a 
             correctional facility, and for other purposes.
```
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2
              
              [LETTERHEAD OF MILLER AND LENTS, LTD. APPEARS HERE]

                                March 19, 1997

Cross Timbers Oil Company
810 Houston Street, Suite 2000              
Fort Worth, TX 76102

                                            Re:  Cross Timbers Oil Company
                                                 1996 Annual Report on Form 10-K

Gentlemen:

     The firm of Miller and Lents, Ltd., consents to the use of its name and to 
the use of its report dated March 11, 1997, regarding the Cross Timbers Oil 
Company Proved Reserves and Future Net Revenue as of January 1, 1997, in the 
1996 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

      Miller and Lents, Ltd., has no interests in the Cross Timbers Oil Company
or in any affiliated companies or subsidiaries and is not to receive any such
interest as payment for such reports and has no director, officer or employee
otherwise connected with Cross Timbers Oil Company. We are not employed by Cross
Timbers Oil Company on a contingent basis.

                                        Very truly yours,

                                        MILLER AND LENTS, LTD.


                                        By      P.G. VON TUNGELN
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           P.G. Von Tungeln
                                           Chairman
**Exhibit 99.2**

 

**Certifications**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, each of the undersignedofficers of TELUS Corporation (“TELUS”) hereby certifies that to his knowledge,(a) the annual report for the period ended December 31, 2007 (the “Report”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable,of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and (b) the information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of TELUS.

 

 
| Date: March  14,****2008.                            |
|------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                 |
| *“Darren Entwistle”*                       |   |
| Darren Entwistle                                     |
| President and Chief Executive Officer                |
|                                                 |
|                                                 |
| Date: March  14, 2008.                               |
|                                                 |
| *“Robert G. McFarlane”*                    |   |
| Robert G. McFarlane                                  |
| Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
#### § 82.20 Civil rights.

Each cooperative agreement shall be supported by a statement of assurance executed by the grantee providing that the project will be carried out in accordance with title VI, non-discrimination in federally assisted programs, of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. 2000d-2000d-4, and with the Secretary's regulations promulgated thereunder, 43 CFR part 17.
#### § 222.22 Stay of appeal.

If an appellant requests mediation of a decision subject to mediation under § 222.20 in an appeal filed under 36 CFR part 214, the Appeal Deciding Officer shall immediately notify all parties to the appeal that all appeal deadlines are automatically stayed for 45 days to allow for mediation. If a mediated agreement is not reached in 45 days, the Appeal Deciding Officer may extend the automatic stay for another 15 days if there is a reasonable possibility that a mediated agreement can be achieved within that timeframe. If an agreement is not achieved at the end of the 45- or 60-day mediation process, the Appeal Deciding Officer shall immediately notify all parties to the appeal that mediation was unsuccessful, that the stay has expired, and that the time periods and procedures applicable to an appeal under 36 CFR part 214 are reinstated.
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion *

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-10023

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

OTHNIEL MCKINNEY, SR.,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:93-CR-29-16

Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Othniel McKinney, Sr., federal prisoner # 24693-077, was convicted by a

jury of one count of conspiracy to distribute and to possess with intent to

distribute cocaine base (crack), and he was sentenced to life in prison. That

sentence was reduced in 1996 to 360 months following amendments to the

Sentencing Guidelines imposing a maximum base offense level of 38 for drug

offenses. Based on 2007 amendments to the Sentencing Guidelines that lowered

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 20, 2009

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 09-10023

2

base offense levels for crack cocaine offenses, McKinney moved for another

reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The district court denied the

motion on the basis that McKinney’s base offense level remained 38 even with

the amendments. McKinney now appeals, arguing that the district court had

the authority in light of United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), and its

progeny to reduce his sentence notwithstanding the contrary policy statement

set out in U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10.

We recently rejected materially indistinguishable arguments in United

States v. Doublin, 572 F.3d 235, 236-39 (5th Cir. 2009), petition for cert. filed

(Sept. 21, 2009) (No. 09-6657). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court

is AFFIRMED.
| (1)    |      | The Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|--------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                     |                                                                                                                                                                                |
| (2)    |                     | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                |

| /s/ Thomas R. Johnson       |
|-----------------------------|
| Thomas R. Johnson           |
| Chief Executive Officer and |
| Chief Financial Officer     |

----
# EUR-Lex - 12008E190 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008E190

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - PART THREE: UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS - TITLE XIX: RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT AND SPACE - Article 190 (ex Article 173 TEC) **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0132 - 0132 *

Article 190

(ex Article 173 TEC)

At the beginning of each year the Commission shall send a report to the European Parliament and to the Council. The report shall include information on research and technological development activities and the dissemination of results during the previous year, and the work programme for the current year.

--------------------------------------------------
# EUR-Lex - 12008M002 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008M002

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on European Union - TITLE I: COMMON PROVISIONS - Article 2 **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0017 - 0017 *

Article 2

The Union is founded on the values of respect for human dignity, freedom, democracy, equality, the rule of law and respect for human rights, including the rights of persons belonging to minorities. These values are common to the Member States in a society in which pluralism, non-discrimination, tolerance, justice, solidarity and equality between women and men prevail.

--------------------------------------------------
Marc h 12,201 0 

## DE FiC T^'il^i^OniMiO H TOSHIB A Th e Honorabl e Ra

yLaHoo d Secretar y; ; Unite d State s Departmen t o fTransportatio n 120 0 Ne wJerseyAvenue , S E Washington , D.C . 

### 2059 0 

### 32

Subject : Haned a Combinatio n Service s Allocatio n Proceedin g DOT-OST-2010-001 8 Dea rSecretar

yLaFfood : A s a dedicate d trave i partne ro fAmerica n ATrtlnes , 1 an rwritin g I n support o fAmericarf s applicatio n t o provid e ne wservic e fro m Ne wYorlc' s Joh n F. Kenned yinternationa l Airpor t an d Lo

s Angele s Internationa l Airpor t t o Toky o Internationa l Airpor t a t Haneda . I recogniz e an d applau d yo u an d th e Obam a administratio n fo ryou rsuccess las t Decembe ri n reachin g a landmar k Ope n Skie s agreemen t wit h Japan , whic h open s u p Haned a t o servic e byU.S . airlines . t encourag e you rselectio n o fAmerica n Airline s t o provid e nonsto p servic e fro m Ne w Yor k an d Lo s Angele s t o Haned a i n orde rt o provid e a n essentia l connectio n betwee n thre e o fth e world' s larges t financia l an d commerc e centers . Recen t events . Includin g th e successfu l preservatio n o fJapa n Airlines ' oneworl d Allianc e membership , hav e underscore d American' s stron g commitmen t t o th e trans-Pacifi c market . America n i s likewis e committe d t o Ne wYor k an d Lo s Angele s - bot h vita l foca l point s o fbusiness , trade , entertainment , technolog yan d educatio n - providin g unsurpasse d ai rservic e sinc e th e mid-1900 s Bot h th e Ne wYor k

an d Lo s Angele s metr o area s wil l gai n significan t economi cbenefit s fro m thes e propose d ne wflights , a s wil t American' s customer s an d employees . However , w e nee d you rhel p t o make th e JFK/Haned a connectio n a reality . Therefore , i strongl yurg e yo u t o sa yye s t o America n Airline s an d it s reques t fo rslot s t o fl yfro m Kenned yt o Haned a I Slncerel ' Bria n Clella( U DirectQf^uma n Resource s 

### Toshib aAmtrica . Inc . Ratlranwn t Plan t Ofllct • 974 0 Irvin

e Blvd. • Irvine , Californi

a9261 8 Phon e (9A9 ) 461-404 0 • Ncslmn i (949 ) 461-414 5
Order

- 1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

Supreme Court No. DA 22

- 0 571

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

TRISTAN MICHAEL LANGFORD,

Defendant and Appellant

.

___________________________________________________ ______________

ORDER

_______________ ___________________________________________________

Upon consideration of Appellant’s Unopposed M otion for E xtension

of Ti me, and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension

of time to and including June 7 , 2024 , within which to prepare, file, and

serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronical ly signed and dated as ind icated below.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 31 2024

05/31/2024

Case Number: DA 22-0571
§ 1192.127 Sleeping compartments. ( a ) Sleeping compartments required to be accessible shall be designed so as to allow a person using a wheelchair or mobility aid to enter, maneuver within and approach and use each element within such compartment. (See Fig. 5.)
( b ) Each accessible compartment shall contain a restroom complying with § 1192.123(a) which can be entered directly from such compartment.
( c ) Controls and operating mechanisms (e.g., heating and air conditioning controls, lighting controls, call buttons, electrical outlets, etc.) shall be mounted no more than 48 inches, and no less than 15 inches, above the floor and shall have a clear floor area directly in front a minimum of 30 inches by 48 inches. Controls and operating mechanisms shall be operable with one hand and shall not require tight grasping, pinching, or twisting of the wrist.
§ 1238.16 What are the microfilming requirements for temporary records, duplicates, and user copies? ( a ) *Temporary records with a retention period over 99 years.* Agencies must use the microfilming requirements in § 1238.14.
( b ) *Temporary records to be kept for less than 99 years, duplicates, and user copies.* NARA does not require the use of specific standards for these microforms. Agencies may select a film stock that meets their needs and ensures the preservation of the microforms for their full retention period. NARA recommends that agencies consult appropriate standards, available as noted in § 1238.3, and manufacturer's instructions for processing production, and maintenance of microform to ensure that the images are accessible and usable for the entire retention period of the records.
From: jerry hollister

To: CELA

Cc: Kathleen Hollister

Subject: MUR 8113

Date: Saturday, March 11, 2023 10:06:51 AM

Good day,

I have received complaint MUR 8113 that alleges an improper in-kind contribution to the

campaign of Representative Elissa Slotkin. As explained below, I have not made an excessive

campaign contribution to Rep. Slotkin’s campaign. Rather, my wife and I rented her a

property at a fair market value.

The property my wife and I rented to Dave Moore & Elissa Slotkin was 

Lansing MI 48906. This is "Property 2" as described in the complaint. My wife, Kathy, and I

are both listed as owners of the property and are both listed on the lease agreement. Kathy and

I have since sold “Property 1” ( East Lansing MI 48823) and it was never

used or occupied by Rep. Slotkin; it is irrelevant to this matter.

The property did come partially furnished with bare furnishings: a bed, 2

couches, a desk, dining room table/chairs, and basic kitchenware. However, Ms. Slotkin

provided other items needed to live in the home.

While discussing the potential lease with Ms. Slotkin in February 2022, we had a deliberate

discussion about determining fair market value. Kathy and I did research using the property

website Zillow.com for other 2 BR 2 Bath apartments in the Lansing/East Lansing area and

found apartments ranging from $1000 - $1750. Since the lease included utilities and some

furnishings, we added $250 to the higher end to make the monthly rent $2000. We all agreed

that this was a fair price and in keeping with the higher values of the rental market at the time.

At no time was there any intention to discount the rental rate. In fact, by selecting rates at the

top of our research, the exact opposite was the case. 

Please contact me at if there are further questions.

Jerry & Kathy Hollister

MUR811300027