alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
p. 1 

# OAR Box 1394 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 44 ) ll-C-1 4 Docket Number: 

# A-94-5 2

Printed 7/3/20087:52:00AM

Sheet 44 of 56P. 2

O PACIFI C ENVIRONMENTA L SERVICES , INC . fr">-r- ~ 

### s?s~s~ 

## A-94-5 2 Centra l Par k

Wes t 500 1 Sout h Miam i Boulevar d

P O Box1207 7 Researc h Triangl e Park , N C 27709-207 7 (919)941-033 3 FA

X (919 ) 941-023 4

August 18 , 199 3 L:\N02 7 FACSIMIL E TRANSMISSIO N Mr . RalphHil l Lexmar kInternationa l Departmen t 761 , Buildin g 1 74 0 Ne w Circl e Roa d Lexington , K

Y4051 1 Dea r Mr . Hill : Pe r ou r discussio no nth e phon e today , Lexmar kInternationa l woul dno t be require dt o respon dt o th e screenin g surve y fo r HAP emission s fro m th e reinforce dplastic s composit e industry . You r busines s i s no t adequatel y relate dt o thi s field . I f an y furthe r correspondenc e i s neede dfo r thi s task , pleas e d o no t hesitat e t o contac t m e a t (919 ) 941-0333 . Sincerely , PACIFI C ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES , INC . Dea nCarrol l Environmenta l Enginee r DC:l y


### OCT 

### I ( •

WASHINGTON . D.C . • RESEARC H TRIANGL E PARK , N C • LO S ANGELES . C A• CINCINNATI . O H
#### § 228.2 Scope.

These regulations apply to operations hereafter conducted under the United States mining laws of May 10, 1872, as amended (30 U.S.C. 22 *et seq.*), as they affect surface resources on all National Forest System lands under the jurisdiction of the Secretary of Agriculture to which such laws are applicable: *Provided, however,* That any area of National Forest lands covered by a special Act of Congress (16 U.S.C. 482a-482q) is subject to the provisions of this part and the provisions of the special act, and in the case of conflict the provisions of the special act shall apply.
# EUR-Lex - 12008E317 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008E317

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - PART SIX: INSTITUTIONAL AND FINANCIAL PROVISIONS - TITLE II: FINANCIAL PROVISIONS - Chapter 4: Implementation of the budget and discharge - Article 317 (ex Article 274 TEC) **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0186 - 0186 *

Article 317

(ex Article 274 TEC)

The Commission shall implement the budget in cooperation with the Member States, in accordance with the provisions of the regulations made pursuant to Article 322, on its own responsibility and within the limits of the appropriations, having regard to the principles of sound financial management. Member States shall cooperate with the Commission to ensure that the appropriations are used in accordance with the principles of sound financial management.

The regulations shall lay down the control and audit obligations of the Member States in the implementation of the budget and the resulting responsibilities. They shall also lay down the responsibilities and detailed rules for each institution concerning its part in effecting its own expenditure.

Within the budget, the Commission may, subject to the limits and conditions laid down in the regulations made pursuant to Article 322, transfer appropriations from one chapter to another or from one subdivision to another.

--------------------------------------------------
# EUR-Lex - 12008E345 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008E345

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - PART SEVEN: GENERAL AND FINAL PROVISIONS - Article 345 (ex Article 295 TEC) **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0194 - 0194 *

Article 345

(ex Article 295 TEC)

The Treaties shall in no way prejudice the rules in Member States governing the system of property ownership.

--------------------------------------------------
# EUR-Lex - 12004V236 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V236

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART III — THE POLICIES AND FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - TITLE III — INTERNAL POLICIES AND ACTION - CHAPTER III — POLICIES IN OTHER AREAS - Section 7 — Transport - Article III-236 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0105 - 0106 *

Article III-236

1. The objectives of the Constitution shall, in matters governed by this Section, be pursued within the framework of a common transport policy.

2. European laws or framework laws shall implement paragraph 1, taking into account the distinctive features of transport. They shall be adopted after consultation of the Committee of the Regions and the Economic and Social Committee.

Such European laws or framework laws shall establish:

(a) common rules applicable to international transport to or from the territory of a Member State or passing across the territory of one or more Member States;

(b) the conditions under which non-resident carriers may operate transport services within a Member State;

(c) measures to improve transport safety;

(d) any other appropriate measure.

3. When the European laws or framework laws referred to in paragraph 2 are adopted, account shall be taken of cases where their application might seriously affect the standard of living and level of employment in certain regions, and the operation of transport facilities.

--------------------------------------------------
# EUR-Lex - 12008E133 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008E133

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - PART THREE: UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS - TITLE VIII: ECONOMIC AND MONETARY POLICY - Chapter 2: Monetary policy - Article 133 **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0105 - 0105 *

Article 133

Without prejudice to the powers of the European Central Bank, the European Parliament and the Council, acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure, shall lay down the measures necessary for the use of the euro as the single currency. Such measures shall be adopted after consultation of the European Central Bank.

--------------------------------------------------
# EUR-Lex - 12008E289 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008E289

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - PART SIX: INSTITUTIONAL AND FINANCIAL PROVISIONS - TITLE I: INSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS - Chapter 2: Legal acts of the Union, adoption procedures and other provisions - Section 1: The legal acts of the Union - Article 289 **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0172 - 0172 *

Article 289

1. The ordinary legislative procedure shall consist in the joint adoption by the European Parliament and the Council of a regulation, directive or decision on a proposal from the Commission. This procedure is defined in Article 294.

2. In the specific cases provided for by the Treaties, the adoption of a regulation, directive or decision by the European Parliament with the participation of the Council, or by the latter with the participation of the European Parliament, shall constitute a special legislative procedure.

3. Legal acts adopted by legislative procedure shall constitute legislative acts.

4. In the specific cases provided for by the Treaties, legislative acts may be adopted on the initiative of a group of Member States or of the European Parliament, on a recommendation from the European Central Bank or at the request of the Court of Justice or the European Investment Bank.

--------------------------------------------------
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                        PURSUANT TO 18U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ace Marketing & Promotions, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2009 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Sean McDonnell, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

                                                   /S/ SEAN MCDONNELL
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   SEAN MCDONNELL
                                                   CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                                   NOVEMBER 16, 2009
## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E R R A T UM

April 18, 2005

Appeal No. 03-1609 Juicy Whip v. Orange Bang

Precedential Opinion

Decided: September 3, 2004

“Change the Conclusion to read as follows:

For the reasons stated above, we affirm the district court’s denial of enhanced

damages and attorney fees, vacate the damages award, and remand for further

proceedings to permit Juicy Wh ip to attempt to prove lost profits damages in

excess of reasonable royalty damages, fa iling which the reasonable royalty

damages already determined should be reinstated.”
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                           PERSISTENCE SOFTWARE, INC.

                            CERTIFICATION PRUSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Persistence Software, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Brian Tobin, Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

    (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.


/s/ BRIAN TOBIN
Brian Tobin
Acting Chief Financial Officer
November 14, 2003
#### § 1270.4 Definitions.

For the purposes of this part—

*Agency* has the meaning given by 5 U.S.C. 551(1)(A)-(D) and 552(f).

*Archivist* means the Archivist of the United States or staff of the National Archives and Records Administration acting on behalf of the Archivist.

*Presidential records* has the meaning given by 44 U.S.C. 2201(2).
§ 1236.32 Digitization standards. When digitizing temporary records, agencies must meet the following standards: ( a ) Capture all information contained in the source records;
( b ) Include all the pages or parts from the source records;
( c ) Ensure the agency can use the digitized records for all the purposes the source records serve, including the ability to attest to transactions and activities;
( d ) Protect against unauthorized deletions, additions, or alterations to the digitized versions; and
( e ) Ensure the agency can locate, retrieve, access, and use the digitized versions for the records' entire retention period.
[84 FR 14266, Apr. 10, 2019, as amended at 89 FR 46804, May 30, 2024]
EXHIBIT 32.1

                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
                       as adopted pursuant to Section 906
                        of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of AngelCiti Entertainment, Inc. (the
"Company") on Amendment No. 2 to Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30,
2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, George Gutierrez, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.




Dated: April 5, 2006                   /s/ George Gutierrez
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       George Gutierrez, Chief Executive Officer
                                       and Chief Financial Officer
#### Anna Seitz, Appellant, *v.*Magdalena Messerschmitt, Respondent, Impleaded with Others.

(Submitted April 2, 1907;

decided April 16, 1907.)

*Seitz*v. *Messerschmitt,*117 App. Div. 401, affirmed.

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered Reb*588ruary 8, 1907, which affirmed an order of Special Term granting the motion of the respondent herein to be relieved of her purchase of real property at a partition sale.

*John F. Frees*and *George Q. Oollins*for appellant.

*Joseph T. Weed*for respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., O’Brien, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Yann, Hiscook and Chase, J.J.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JAMES ARTHUR CORBETT,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 263 MAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 14th day of December, 2022

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
#### § 1239.4 What standards are used as guidance for this part?

These regulations conform with guidance provided in ISO 15489-1:2001. Paragraphs 7.1, Principles of records management programmes, and 10, Monitoring and auditing, apply to this part.
### Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA

- 

### 201 3

- 0750 Directorate Identifier: 

### 201 3

- NE

- 25

- AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell

.

**Estimated Costs:**

Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Do not include on

condition costs here Costs per **Product** (e.g., aircraft, engine,

propeller, appliance) Work

- hours (include access, testing, and close

- up) Labor

cost (@$8 5 /h our) Parts Cost Total Costs (labor + parts) Number of

**U.S. Registered**  **Products** Total Cost

for U.S. Fleet



### RB211

- 5 35 HP n IP disk removal 10 % life reduction 0.0 $ 0.00 $4,000 $ 4,000.00 

### 20 $ 80,000.00

$ 0.00 $0 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

### 0 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

### 0 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

### 0 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

### 0 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

### 0 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00


### The known number of products in compliance: Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $ 80,000 

### Costs covered under warranty ( if known ) $

**On**

**- Condition Costs:** 
Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Work

- hours

(include access, testing, and close

up) Labor cost

(@$85/hour) Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00



### Special considerations for Economic Analysis ( Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs) 

### : 

### ASE Estimate

### based on our database and estimated loss of disk life . the number of engines is in relation to the

numb er of Serial numbers affected. Estimated disk cost $20,000 with 10% life reduction

**Executive Order 12866:**
Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?
YES * NO

* Explanation: **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:**
Is the AD significant ?
YES * NO

* Explanatio n: **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? E xplain for

either a Yes or No answer.
YES NO Explanation:

**Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:**
This AD could affect i ntrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?
YES * NO



### * Explanation 

### :
§ 228.111 Temporary cessation of operations. ( a ) *General.* As soon as it becomes apparent that there will be a temporary cessation of operations for a period of 45 days or more, the operator must verbally notify and subsequently file a statement with the authorized Forest officer verifying the operator's intent to maintain structures, facilities, improvements, and equipment that will remain on the area of operation during the cessation of operations, and specifying the expected date by which operations will be resumed.
( b ) *Seasonal shutdowns.* The operator need not file the statement required by paragraph (a) of this section if the cessation of operations results from seasonally adverse weather conditions and the operator will resume operations promptly upon the conclusion of those adverse weather conditions.
( c ) *Interim measures.* The authorized Forest officer may require the operator to take reasonable interim reclamation or erosion control measures to protect surface resources during temporary cessations of operations, including during cessations of operations resulting from seasonally adverse weather conditions.
# EUR-Lex - 12008E266 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008E266

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - PART SIX: INSTITUTIONAL AND FINANCIAL PROVISIONS - TITLE I: INSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS - Chapter 1: The institutions - Section 5: The Court of Justice of the European Union - Article 266 (ex Article 233 TEC) **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0163 - 0163 *

Article 266

(ex Article 233 TEC)

The institution whose act has been declared void or whose failure to act has been declared contrary to the Treaties shall be required to take the necessary measures to comply with the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union.

This obligation shall not affect any obligation which may result from the application of the second paragraph of Article 340.

--------------------------------------------------
#### In the Matter of the Petition of Albert Thieriot, as Executor of Rosa Delmonico, Deceased, et al., Appellants, for the Revocation of Letters Testamentary Issued to Josephine C. Delmonico, as Executrix of Rosa Delmonico, Deceased, and for Her Removal as Testamentary Trustee. Josephine C. Delmonico, Respondent.

(Argued April 3, 1907;

decided April 23, 1907.)

*Matter of Thieriot,*117 App. Div. 686, modified.

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered February 25, 1907, which reversed a decree of the New York *590County Surrogate’s Court granting the above-entitled petition and dismissed the proceeding.

*Solomon Ilanford*and *William T. Houston*for appellants.

*Morgan J. O'Brien*and *Henry Mayor*for respondent.

Order of Appellate Division modified so as to direct a rehearing before the surrogate, upon which the issues raised ■by petition and answer may be tried, and as modified the order is affirmed, without costs in this court to either party; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., O’Brien, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Hiscock and Chase, JJ.
# EUR-Lex - 12008M/PRO/17 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008M/PRO/17

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on European Union - PROTOCOLS - Protocol (No 17) on Denmark **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0288 - 0288 *

PROTOCOL (No 17)

ON DENMARK

THE HIGH CONTRACTING PARTIES,

DESIRING to settle certain particular problems relating to Denmark,

HAVE AGREED upon the following provisions, which shall be annexed to the Treaty establishing the European Community:

The provisions of Article 14 of the Protocol on the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank shall not affect the right of the National Bank of Denmark to carry out its existing tasks concerning those parts of the Kingdom of Denmark which are not part of the Community.

--------------------------------------------------
NO. 07-06-0202-CR

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL D

	JUNE 14, 2006

	______________________________

	MARK CARROLL DAVIS, APPELLANT

	V.

	THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

	_________________________________

	FROM THE 251ST DISTRICT COURT OF RANDALL COUNTY;

	NO. 16,772-C; HONORABLE PATRICK PIRTLE, JUDGE

	_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ.

	MEMORANDUM OPINION

	Appellant Mark Carroll Davis appeals from his conviction of delivery of a controlled substance.  The certification of appellant’s right to appeal executed by the trial court states appellant has no right of appeal because his conviction was the result of a plea bargain and appellant waived the right of appeal.  By letter dated May 16, 2006 this court informed appellant that Rule of Appellate Procedure 32.2 required him to file a docketing statement, giving him ten days to do so.  On May 22, we notified appellant that the certification filed by the trial court indicates he has no right to appeal, inviting a response to that certification by June 6, 2006.  No response to either letter has been received and the clerk’s record has not been filed.  

	Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(d) requires dismissal of an appeal from a criminal conviction in the absence of a certification showing the defendant’s right of appeal.  Dismissal is not required if the certification is defective.  Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 613 (Tex.Crim.App. 2005).  Under the holding in Dears, an appellate court is not required to wait until the clerk’s record is filed to determine if dismissal is required under Rule 25.2(d).  Dears, 154 S.W.3d at 614-15.  Having received no reply to either of our requests to appellant, nothing before the court indicates the trial court’s certification is defective.

	Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

							James T. Campbell

							        Justice

Do not publish.
### Summary of Analy tical Results 662 - October 2012

**Sample ID** 662-GRAB 662-GRAB 662-GRAB 662-GRAB 662-GRAB **Date** 10/1/12 10/8/12 10/15/12 10/22/12 10/31/12 **Top (ft)** 0 0 0 0 0 **Total (T)/ Bottom (ft)**  0 0 0 0 0 **An aly**  **te units** **Diss. (D) Duplicate #**  1 1 1 1 1 PFOA ug/L T 0.444 0.312 0.239 2.09 2.53

ug/L = micrograms per liter or parts per billion (ppb) ND = not detected (shown as <LOD) NQ = not quantifiable (shown as <LOQ) ND<LOD<NQ<LOQ LOD = limit of detection = 0.0250 ug/L LOQ = limit of quantification = 0.100 ug/L

Samples were analyzed by Critical Path Services LLC. Reported results represent a single analysis, except for the sample collected on 10/15/12. Acceptable precision was obtained and the reported result for the sample collected on 10/15/12 represents the average of lab duplicate results.

The NJDEP lab certification number for Critical Path Services LLC is PA072. PFOA = Perfluorooctanoic Acid ug/L = micrograms per Liter

< and ND = Non detect at stated reporting limit Page 1 of 1 0900006481185062:Sheet1 12/12/2012 10:27 PM