alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-10.14





 Exhibit 10.14 

GUARANTEE ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT 

GUARANTEE ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT dated as of May 7, 2020, by SFE 1, LLC, a limited liability company organized under the laws of the State
of Delaware (“SFE 1”) and SFE 2, LLC, a limited liability company organized under the laws of the State of Delaware (together with SFE 1, the “Additional Guarantors” and each an “Additional
Guarantor”), in favor of Spectrum License Holder LLC (“License Holder I”), Sprint Spectrum License Holder II LLC (“License Holder II”), Sprint Spectrum License Holder III LLC (“License Holder
III” and, together with License Holder I and License Holder II, “Lessors” and each, a “Lessor”) under that certain Intra-Company Spectrum Lease Agreement dated October 27, 2016 by and among Lessor, the
Guarantors party thereto, Sprint Spectrum Intermediate HoldCo LLC and Sprint Communications, Inc. (as amended from time to time, the “Lease Agreement”). 

Pursuant to Section 14 of the Lease Agreement, each Additional Guarantor hereby agrees to become a “Guarantor” for all purposes
of the Lease Agreement. Without limiting the foregoing, each Additional Guarantor hereby: 
 (a) jointly and severally with
the other Guarantors, guarantees to Lessors and their respective successors and assigns the prompt payment in full when due of any and all Guaranteed Obligations (as defined in the Lease Agreement) in the same manner and to the same extent as is
provided in the Lease Agreement as if such Additional Guarantor were an original party thereto; and 
 (b) makes the
representations and warranties as of the date hereof, and agrees to perform the covenants set forth in, Section 10 of the Lease Agreement with respect to itself and its obligations under this Guarantee Assumption Agreement. 

This Guarantee Assumption Agreement shall be governed by, enforced and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of New York without
regard to conflict of laws principles. 
 [remainder of this page intentionally left blank] 












 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each Additional Guarantor has caused this Guarantee Assumption Agreement
to be duly executed and delivered as of the day and year first above written. 
  

					
	SFE 1, LLC
	SFE 2, LLC
		
	By:	 	 /s/ J. Braxton Carter

		 	Name:	 	J. Braxton Carter
		 	Title:	 	Executive Vice President and
		 		 	Chief Financial Officer


 [Guarantee Assumption Agreement] 













					
	Accepted and agreed:
	
	SPRINT SPECTRUM LICENSE HOLDER LLC
	SPRINT SPECTRUM LICENSE HOLDER II LLC
	SPRINT SPECTRUM LICENSE HOLDER III LLC
		
	By:	 	 /s/ J. Braxton Carter

		 	Name:	 	J. Braxton Carter
		 	Title:	 	Executive Vice President and
		 		 	Chief Financial Officer

 [Guarantee Assumption Agreement]
#### § 1239.20 When will NARA undertake an inspection?

NARA may undertake an inspection when an agency fails to address specific records management problems involving high risk to significant records. Problems may be identified through a risk assessment or through other means, such as reports in the media, Congressional inquiries, allegations of unauthorized destruction, reports issued by the GAO or an agency's Inspector General, or observations by NARA staff members. Inspections will be undertaken when other NARA program assistance efforts (see § 1239.10) have failed to mitigate situations where there is a high risk of loss of significant records, or when NARA agrees to a request from the agency head that NARA conduct an inspection to address specific significant records management issues in the agency. NARA reports to Congress and the Office of Management and Budget on inspections in accordance with 44 U.S.C. 2904.
<PAGE>

Exhibit 99.1

                           PERSISTENCE SOFTWARE, INC.

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Persistence Software, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Christopher T. Keene, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

       (1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

       (2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company.



/S/ Christopher T. Keene
------------------------
Christopher T. Keene
Chief Executive Officer
August 14, 2002
# EUR-Lex - 12006E077 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12006E077

**Treaty establishing the European Community (consolidated version) - Part Three - Community policies - TITLE V - Transport - Article 77 **

*
Official Journal C 321 E , 29/12/2006 P. 0072 - 0072 Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0063 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0207 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0028 - Consolidated version (EEC Treaty - no official publication available) *

Article 77

Charges or dues in respect of the crossing of frontiers which are charged by a carrier in addition to the transport rates shall not exceed a reasonable level after taking the costs actually incurred thereby into account.

Member States shall endeavour to reduce these costs progressively.

The Commission may make recommendations to Member States for the application of this Article.

--------------------------------------------------
SCPW-12-0000831

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

 

MICHAEL C. TIERNEY, 

Petitioner,

vs.

TED SAKAI, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC SAFETY, STATE OF HAWAI#I,

Respondent.

 

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ.)

Upon consideration of petitioner Michael C. Tierney’s

motion for reconsideration of the March 13, 2013 order denying

his petition for a writ of mandamus, which was electronically

filed by the appellate clerk on March 22, 2013, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion for

reconsideration is denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, April 1, 2013.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCPW-12-0000831

01-APR-2013

10:39 AM
As data about alternative fuel use become available, an attempt is made to incorporate them into this table. Sometimes assumptions must be made in order to use the data. Please see Appendix A for a description of the methodology used to develop these data.

Liquified petroleum Residual Natural Gasoline Diesel fuel gas Jet fuel fuel oil gas HIGHWA

Y 17,022.50 5,288.90 62.4 18.4 Light vehicles 16,485.5 394.5 44.9 Cars 9,166.6 51.6 Light trucks b 7,288.5 343.0 44.9 Motorcycles 30.3 Buses 6.9 167.7 18.4 Transit 0.3 71.8 18.4 Intercity 29.7 School 6.6 66.2 Medium/heavy trucks 530.1 4,726.6 17.5 NONHIGHWA

Y 241.7 930.9 0 2,470.50 1,012.10 642.2 Ai r 38.9 0.0 0 2,470.50 0.0 0.0 General aviation 38.9 204.7 Domestic air carriers 1,847.00 International air carriersc 418.8 Water 202.7 344.2 1,012.10 Freight 299.6 1,012.10 Recreational 202.7 44.6 Pipeline 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 642.2 Rail 0.0 586.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Freight (Class I) 566.9 Passenger 19.8 Transit 0.0 Commuter 11.2 Intercity 8.6 TOTAL HWY & NONHWY 17,264.1 6,219.7 62.4 2,470.5 1,012.10 660.6

Source: See Appendix A for Energy Use Sources.

a Civilian consum ption only. Totals may not include all possible uses of fuels for transportation (e.g., snowmobiles).

b Two-axle, four-tire trucks.

cOne half of fuel used by domestic carriers in international operation. Table 2.5 Domestic Consumption of Transportation Energy by Mode and Fuel Type, 2007 (trillion Btu)As data about alternative fuel use become available, an attempt is made to incorporate them into this table. Sometimes assumptions must be made in order to use the data. Please see Appendix A for a description

Electricity Total 0.6 22,392.7 16,924.9 9,218.2 7,676.4 30.3 0.6 193.7 0.6 91.2

29.7 72.8 5,274.2 312.1 5,609.5 0.0 2,509.5

243.6 1,847.0 418.8 1,559.1 1,311.7 247.3 241.3 883.5 70.8 657.5

566.9 70.8 90.5 46.6 46.6 18.2 29.4 6 14.5 312.7 28,002.2

Civilian consum ption only. Totals may not include all possible uses of fuels for transportation (e.g., snowmobiles). Domestic Consumption of Transportation Energy by Mode and Fuel Type, 2007a
§ 80.66 What requirements apply to allocation of funds between marine and freshwater fisheries projects? The requirements of this section apply to allocation of funds between marine and freshwater fisheries projects. ( a ) When a State fish and wildlife agency allocates and obligates funds it must meet the following requirements: ( 1 ) The ratio of total funds obligated for marine fisheries projects to total funds obligated for marine and freshwater fisheries projects combined must equal the ratio of resident marine anglers to the total number of resident anglers in the State; and
( 2 ) The ratio of total funds obligated for freshwater fisheries projects to total funds obligated for marine and freshwater fisheries projects combined must equal the ratio of resident freshwater anglers to the total number of resident anglers in the State.
( b ) A resident angler is one who fishes for recreational purposes in the same State where he or she maintains legal residence.
( c ) Agencies must determine the relative distribution of resident anglers in the State between those that fish in marine environments and those that fish in freshwater environments. Agencies must use the National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-associated Recreation or another statistically reliable survey or technique approved by the Regional Director for this purpose.
( d ) If an agency uses statistical sampling to determine the relative distribution of resident anglers in the State between those that fish in marine environments and those that fish in freshwater environments, the sampling must be complete by the earlier of the following: ( 1 ) Five years after the last statistical sample; or
( 2 ) Before completing the first certification following any change in the licensing system that could affect the number of sportfishing license holders.
( e ) The amounts allocated from each year's apportionment do not necessarily have to result in an equitable allocation for each year. However, the amounts allocated over a variable period, not to exceed 3 years, must result in an equitable allocation between marine and freshwater fisheries projects.
( f ) Agencies that fail to allocate funds equitably between marine and freshwater fisheries projects may become ineligible to use Sport Fish Restoration program funds. These agencies must remain ineligible until they demonstrate to the Director that they have allocated the funds equitably.
#### Charles McManus, an Infant, by Alice McManus, His Guardian ad Litem, Respondent, *v.*St. Regis Paper Company, Appellant.

(Argued February 26, 1907;

decided March 12, 1907.)

*McManus*v. *St. Regis Paper Co.,*112 App. Div. 903, affirmed.

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered March 28, 1906, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been caused by defendant’s negligence.

*Henry Purcell*for appellant.

*N. F. Breen*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; ho opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Werner and Willard Bartlett, JJ. Not sitting: Hiscook, J.
#### § 222.63 Removal of other horses and burros.

Horses and burros not within the definition in § 222.20(b)(13) which are introduced onto Wild Horse and Burro Territories or ranges after December 15, 1971, by accident, negligence, or willful disregard of private ownership, and which do not become intermingled with wild free-roaming horses or burros shall be considered as unauthorized livestock and treated in accordance with provisions in 36 CFR 261.7 and 262.10.

[61 FR 35959, July 9, 1996]
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 534 

To withdraw certain Bureau of Land Management land from mineral 

development. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 27, 2023 

Mr. HEINRICH (for himself and Mr. LUJA ́N) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To withdraw certain Bureau of Land Management land from 

mineral development. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Buffalo Tract Protec5 tion Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. WITHDRAWAL. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subject to valid existing rights, 

8 the Federal land described in subsection (b) is withdrawn 

9 from all forms of— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 534 IS

1 (1) location, entry, and patent under the mining 

2 laws; and 

3 (2) disposition under the mineral leasing, min4 eral materials, and geothermal leasing laws. 

5 (b) DESCRIPTION.—The Federal land referred to in 

6 subsections (a) and (c) is the approximately 4,288 acres 

7 of land administered by the Director of the Bureau of 

8 Land Management and generally depicted as ‘‘Tract A’’, 

9 ‘‘Tract B’’, ‘‘Tract C’’, and ‘‘Tract D’’ on the map entitled 

10 ‘‘Placitas, New Mexico Area Map’’ and dated November 

11 13, 2019. 

12 (c) SURFACE ESTATE.— 

13 (1) IN GENERAL.—Subject to the reservation of 

14 the mineral estate under paragraph (2), nothing in 

15 this Act prohibits the Secretary of the Interior from 

16 conveying the surface estate of the Federal land de17 scribed in subsection (b) in accordance with— 

18 (A) the Federal Land Policy and Manage19 ment Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.); or 

20 (B) the Act of June 14, 1926 (commonly 

21 known as the ‘‘Recreation and Public Purposes 

22 Act’’) (43 U.S.C. 869 et seq.). 

23 (2) MINERAL ESTATE.—Any conveyance of the 

24 surface estate of the Federal land described in subVerDate Sep 11 2014 06:23 Mar 07, 2023 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S534.IS S534

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 534 IS

1 section (b) shall require a reservation of the mineral 

2 estate to the United States. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>   1



                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of
ITEQ, Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 333-09051, 33-68516, 33-68518, 33-68636 and
333-50187) and the Registration Statement of ITEQ, Inc. on Form S-3 (File No.
333-39367 and 333-58611) of our report dated December 6, 1996, on our audit of
the consolidated financial statements of Astrotech International Corporation and
subsidiaries for the year ended September 30, 1996.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
March 22, 1999
§ 665.402 Management subareas. The Mariana fishery management area is divided into bottomfish management subareas with the following designations and boundaries: ( a ) *Guam Management Subarea* means the EEZ seaward of the Territory of Guam, with the inner boundary defined as a line coterminous with the seaward boundary of the Territory of Guam.
( b ) *CNMI Management Subarea* means the EEZ seaward of the CNMI, with the inner boundary defined as a line coterminous with the seaward boundary of the CNMI.
( c ) The outer boundary of each fishery management area is a line drawn in such a manner that each point on it is 200 nautical miles from the baseline from which the territorial sea is measured, or is coterminous with adjacent international maritime boundaries. The boundary between the fishery management areas of Guam and the CNMI extends to those points that are equidistant between Guam and the island of Rota in the CNMI. CNMI and Guam management subareas are divided by a line intersecting these two points: 148° E. long., 12° N. lat., and 142° E. long., 16° N. lat.
[75 FR 2205, Jan. 14, 2010, as amended at 81 FR 61626, Sept. 7, 2016]
Docket No: FAA - 2016 - 3986 Dir ID: 2015 - NM - 147 - AD
Date: November 2, 2015 Meeting: Shell Meeting Rule(s) Discussed: Oil and Gas, NSPS, and CTGs Written Materials? Yes/No



### Agency Meeting with Shell - List of Attendees

No. Name Organization Phone Number 1. Dick Francis Shell 281-793-5180 2. Marnie Funk Shell 202-466-1422 3. Jameel Alsalam EPA 202-343-9807 4. Suzie Walter EPA 202-343-9544 5. Kenyatta Miles EPA 504-425-6862 6. Stephen Fotis VNF 202-298-1908 7. Paul Gunning EPA 202-343-9736 8. David Cozzie EPA 919-541-5356 9. Joe Goffman EPA 202-564-7404
#### § 82.10 Payments to grantee.

Payments may be requested by the grantee at intervals of not less than 30 days as work described in the cooperative agreement progresses.
§ 86.42 What do I have to include in a grant application? ( a ) When you submit a BIG grant application, you must include standard forms, a BIG project statement as described at § 86.43, documents, maps, images, and other information asked for in the annual NOFO at *http://www.grants.gov ,* CFDA 15.622, in the format we ask for.
( b ) You must include supporting documentation explaining how the proposed work complies with applicable laws and regulations. You must also state the permits, evaluations, and reviews you need to complete the project. After we approve your project, you will follow guidance at § 86.61 to complete requirements that will become part of your application.
( c ) After we review your application, any responses to our requests to give more information or to clarify information become part of the application.
( d ) Misrepresentations of the information you give in an application may be a reason for us to: ( 1 ) Reject your application; or
( 2 ) Terminate your grant and require repayment of Federal funds awarded.
§ 270.19 Notice of assessment. ( a ) The Council must serve each person subject to assessment with notice that the assessment is due. The notice of assessment must contain: ( 1 ) A specific reference to the provisions of the Act, regulations, charter and referendum that authorize the assessment;
( 2 ) The amount of the assessment;
( 3 ) The period of time covered by the assessment;
( 4 ) The date the assessment is due and payable, which will not be earlier than 30 days from the date of the notice;
( 5 ) The form(s) of payment; and
( 6 ) To whom and where the payment must be made.
( b ) The notice must advise such person of his or her right to seek review of the assessment by filing a written petition of objection with NMFS at any time during the time period to which the assessment applies, including the right to request a hearing on the petition. The notice must state that the petition of objection must be filed in accordance with the procedures in § 270.21.
( c ) The notice must also advise such persons of his or her right to a refund of the assessment as provided in § 270.22. The notice must state that a refund may be requested for not less than 90 days from such collection, and provide that the Council will make the refund within 60 days after the request for the refund is requested.
# EUR-Lex - 12006E051 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12006E051

**Treaty establishing the European Community (consolidated version) - Part Three - Community policies - TITLE III - Free movement of persons, services and capital - Chapter 3 - Ser vices - Article 51 **

*
Official Journal C 321 E , 29/12/2006 P. 0062 - 0062 Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0055 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0198 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0023 - Consolidated version (EEC Treaty - no official publication available) *

Article 51

1. Freedom to provide services in the field of transport shall be governed by the provisions of the title relating to transport.

2. The liberalisation of banking and insurance services connected with movements of capital shall be effected in step with the liberalisation of movement of capital.

--------------------------------------------------
§ 1206.24 What type of proposal is ineligible for a publications grant? ( a ) The Commission does not support: ( 1 ) Historical research apart from what is necessary for editing documentary publications; or
( 2 ) Documentary editing projects to publish the papers of someone who has been deceased for fewer than ten years.
( b ) Other programmatic limitations established by the Commission are found in the grant opportunity announcements and the NHPRC Web site.
[71 FR 27624, May 12, 2006, as amended at 75 FR 66317, Oct. 28, 2010; 79 FR 76080, Dec. 19, 2014]
# EUR-Lex - 12008E/AFI/DCL/14 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008E/AFI/DCL/14

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - DECLARATIONS annexed to the Final Act of the Intergovernmental Conference which adopted the Treaty of Lisbon, signed on 13 December 2007 - A. DECLARATIONS CONCERNING PROVISIONS OF THE TREATIES - 14. Declaration concerning the common foreign and security policy **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0343 - 0343 *

14. Declaration concerning the common foreign and security policy

In addition to the specific rules and procedures referred to in paragraph 1 of Article 24 of the Treaty on European Union, the Conference underlines that the provisions covering the Common Foreign and Security Policy including in relation to the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy and the External Action Service will not affect the existing legal basis, responsibilities, and powers of each Member State in relation to the formulation and conduct of its foreign policy, its national diplomatic service, relations with third countries and participation in international organisations, including a Member State's membership of the Security Council of the United Nations.

The Conference also notes that the provisions covering the Common Foreign and Security Policy do not give new powers to the Commission to initiate decisions nor do they increase the role of the European Parliament.

The Conference also recalls that the provisions governing the Common Security and Defence Policy do not prejudice the specific character of the security and defence policy of the Member States.

--------------------------------------------------
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-83,401-01

IN RE BRIAN DOUGLAS HILL, Relator

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS

CAUSE NO. 1238827-A IN THE 208TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Relator has filed a motion for leave to file an application for a writ of mandamus pursuant

to the original jurisdiction of this Court. In it, he contends that he filed an application for a writ of

habeas corpus in the 208th District Court of Harris County, that more than 35 days have elapsed, and

that the application has not yet been forwarded to this Court. Relator contends that the district court

entered an order designating issues on June 4, 2013.

Respondent, the Judge of the 208th District Court of Harris County, shall file a response with

this Court by having the District Clerk submit the record on such habeas corpus application. In the

alternative, Respondent may resolve the issues set out in the order designating issues and then have

the District Clerk submit the record on such application. In either case, Respondent’s answer shall
2

be submitted within 30 days of the date of this order. This application for leave to file a writ of

mandamus will be held in abeyance until Respondent has submitted her response.

Filed: August 26, 2015

Do not publish