alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document

Exhibit 10.1



SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE 
ALBEMARLE CORPORATION
2013 STOCK COMPENSATION AND
DEFERRAL ELECTION PLAN
FOR NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS


        In accordance with Article 12 of the Albemarle Corporation 2013 Stock Compensation and Deferral Election Plan for Non-Employee Directors, as amended July 11, 2016 (the “Plan”), the Plan is hereby amended as follows:
1. Effective January 1, 2020, Section 6.1 is amended in its entirety to read as follows:
“Annual Grants.  As of each July 1st, commencing with July 1, 2013, the Company will grant to each Director a number of Shares for that Compensation Year. The number of Shares granted to each Director shall be determined by (i) dividing the annual grant value, which amount shall be as determined by the Company each year in its sole discretion, subject to the limits set forth in Section 4.1, by the Fair Market Value of the Shares on the first day of the Compensation Year (which date is the Grant Date for purposes of this Plan), and (ii) rounding such number of Shares up to the nearest increment of 25 Shares. Except as provided herein, the Shares shall remain unvested and forfeitable.”


2. Effective January 1, 2020, Section 6.6(a) is amended in its entirety to read as follows:
“(a) Subject to paragraph (b) and Sections 6.5 and 6.7, all Shares that are forfeitable shall be forfeited if a Director Terminates his or her service as a director before the Shares become vested under Section 6.4.  For the avoidance of doubt, a Director who becomes an executive officer of the Company shall not be deemed to have experienced a Termination for purposes of this paragraph (a) with respect to any previously-made grants that are still forfeitable (referred to herein as “Forfeitable Shares”), unless and until such time as he or she ceases to serve as a director of the Company, provided, however, that with 
1
        






respect to a Director, as defined under this Plan, who ceases to qualify as such prior to the vesting of his or her Forfeitable Shares pursuant to Section 6.4, only a ratable portion of the Forfeitable Shares, as defined in the following sentence, shall vest pursuant to Section 6.4 and the remaining portion of the Forfeitable Shares shall be forfeited.  The pro-rata number of Forfeitable Shares that shall vest pursuant to the preceding sentence (i) shall be equal to 1/365th (without regard to leap years) of the Forfeitable Shares for each day of service performed as a Director during the applicable Compensation Year, and (ii) such number of Shares shall be rounded up to the next whole Share number.  The number of Forfeitable Shares that shall vest under this paragraph (a) shall be determined by the Administrator in his or her sole and absolute discretion.”


        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation by its duly authorized officer and with its seal affixed, has caused these presents to be signed as of this 1st day of July, 2020.


        ALBEMARLE CORPORATION


        By: /s/ Karen G. Narwold  
         Karen G. Narwold
         Executive Vice President, Chief 
         Administrative Officer, General 
         Counsel and Corporate Secretary
2
**EXHIBIT 32.1****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**In connection with the Quarterly Report of EUPA International Corporation (the “Corporation”) onForm 10-QSB/A (No. 1) for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Yuan-Chung Tsai, President and ChiefExecutive Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.     /s/ Yuan-Chung Tsai     Yuan-Chung Tsai
#### § 1121.3 Procedures for requests pertaining to individuals' records in a records system.

An individual or authorized representative shall submit a written request to the Administrative Officer to determine if a system of records named by the individual contains a record pertaining to the individual. The individual or authorized representative shall submit a written request to the Executive Director of the ATBCB which states the individual's desire to review his or her record.
#### § 21.5 Therapeutic bathing requirements.

Baths shall be administered to persons having a prescription from a registered physician with prescription instructions therein. Baths shall be administered to person who do not have prescriptions from registered physicians only if the bath is administered in accordance with the bath directions prescribed by the Superintendent, the violation of which is not subject to the penalty provisions of § 21.2.
# EUR-Lex - 11957A179BIS - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11957A179BIS

**TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN ATOMIC ENERGY COMMUNITY ( E.A.E.C. - EURATOM ), TITLE FOUR - FINANCIAL PROVISIONS **

*

*

Article 179a* (* Article added by Article 22 of the Treaty amending Certain Financial Provisions.)

The Commission shall submit annually to the Council and to the European Parliament the accounts of the preceding financial year relating to the implementation of the budget. The Commission shall also forward to them a financial statement of the assets and liabilities of the Community.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT, NORTHERN

DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, EASTERN DIVISION

RE: MARTHA I RAZO, ) CASE NO. 16 B 28399

 )

) CHAPTER 13

)

DEBTOR(S), ) JUDGE: DONALD R CASSLING

AMENDED NOTICE OF MOTION

To: Martha I Razo Cutler & Associates, LTD

540 Peregrine Parkway via Clerk’s ECF noticing procedures

Bartlett, IL 60103

 

Please take notice that on the August 13, 2020 at 9:15 a.m., I will appear before

Honorable Judge DONALD R CASSLING, or any judge sitting in the judge’s place and 

present the Trustee’s motion to dismiss for failure to make plan payments previously

noticed for August 13, 2020 at 9:15 a.m.

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify under penalty of perjury that this office caused a copy of this notice to be 

delivered to the persons named above by U.S. mail at 55 E. Monroe St., Chicago, IL or 

by the methods indicated on July 20, 2020.

/s/ Tom Vaughn

Tom Vaughn 

Chapter 13 Trustee

55 E. Monroe St., Suite 3850

Chicago, IL 60603

(312) 294-5900

Case 16-28399 Doc 35 Filed 07/20/20 Entered 07/20/20 09:40:07 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 1
# EUR-Lex - 12007L/AFI/DCL/17 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12007L/AFI/DCL/17

**Treaty of Lisbon amending the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Community, signed at Lisbon, 13 December 2007 - A. Declarations concerning provisions of the Treaties - 17. Declaration concerning primacy **

*
Official Journal 306 , 17/12/2007 P. 0256 - 0256 *

17. Declaration concerning primacy

The Conference recalls that, in accordance with well settled case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union, the Treaties and the law adopted by the Union on the basis of the Treaties have primacy over the law of Member States, under the conditions laid down by the said case law.

The Conference has also decided to attach as an Annex to this Final Act the Opinion of the Council Legal Service on the primacy of EC law as set out in 11197/07 (JUR 260):

"Opinion of the Council Legal Service of 22 June 2007

It results from the case-law of the Court of Justice that primacy of EC law is a cornerstone principle of Community law. According to the Court, this principle is inherent to the specific nature of the European Community. At the time of the first judgment of this established case law (Costa/ENEL, 15 July 1964, Case 6/641 [1]) there was no mention of primacy in the treaty. It is still the case today. The fact that the principle of primacy will not be included in the future treaty shall not in any way change the existence of the principle and the existing case-law of the Court of Justice.

[1] "It follows (...) that the law stemming from the treaty, an independent source of law, could not, because of its special and original nature, be overridden by domestic legal provisions, however framed, without being deprived of its character as Community law and without the legal basis of the Community itself being called into question.""

--------------------------------------------------
Order entered March 6, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-01247-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF R.M.R., III, A MINOR CHILD

On Appeal from the 219th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 219-00287-2015

ORDER

We GRANT appellant’s March 3, 2015 unopposed second motion for extension of time 

to file brief and ORDER the brief be filed no later than March 23, 2015. No further extensions 

will be granted absent exigent circumstances.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART 

JUSTICE
Exhibit 13.1



SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION



(pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended
December 28, 2003 of Koninklijke Ahold N.V. (the Company) as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the Commission) on the date hereof (the Report) and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Anders C. Moberg, President, Chief Executive Officer and Member of the Corporate Executive Board of the Company, certify, that:



(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



By:

/s/ Anders C. MobergName: Anders C. Moberg Title: President, Chief Executive Officer and Member of the Corporate Executive Board




Date: May 6, 2004



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Koninklijke Ahold N.V. and will be retained by Koninklijke Ahold N.V. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 1120.12 Indexes to certain records.

Current indexes are normally available to the public in published form as provided in § 1120.11. These indexes, whether or not published, are made available for inspection and copying on request. If published copies of a particular index are at any time not available or if publication of the index has been determined to be unnecessary and impracticable by order published in the Federal Register, copies of the index will be furnished on request. (See § 1120.6(b), *Published indexes.*)
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6068

WAYNE BREWTON,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

WARDEN, MARYLAND CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, J;

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA97-1308-PJM)

Submitted: May 14, 1998 Decided: June 2, 1998

Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mark Lawrence Gitomer, CARDIN & GITOMER, P.A., Baltimore, Maryland,

for Appellant. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Annabelle

Louise Lisic, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.

1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Brewton v. Warden, No. CA-97-1308-PJM (D. Md. Dec. 1,

1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
§ 1260.60 How does the NDC facilitate systematic review of records exempted at the individual record or file series level? ( a ) NARA, through the NDC, follows the procedures established in § 1260.52 above regarding agency access for review of exempt file series.
( b ) NARA, through the NDC, will establish a prioritization schedule for review of exempted individual Federal records. This schedule will take into account upcoming exemption expiration, researcher interest and likelihood of declassification. This schedule will be included as part of the NDC annual work plan.
( c ) The Presidential Libraries will work directly with agencies to facilitate the review of records exempted at the file series level.
( d ) The Presidential Libraries, through the NDC, will establish a prioritization schedule for review of previously exempted classified materials in the Presidential Library system. These materials will be referred to agencies holding equity in the records via the RAC Project.
Advisory

Circular
 

Subject: FAA CERTIFICATED Date: 02/12/08 AC No: 140-7T 

REPAIR STATIONS WEBSITE Initiated by: AFS-640 

(DIRECTORY) 

1. Purpose. This advisory circular (AC) transmits a website that contains Federal 

Aviation Administration (FAA) Certificated Repair Stations, which are certificated under 

the authority of Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) part 145. 

2. Cancellation. This AC cancels AC 140-7S, FAA Certificated Repair Stations 

Directory, dated August 22, 2006. 

3. Directions for Using the Website. You may obtain information regarding FAA 

Certificated Repair Stations by accessing the following website: 

http://av-info.faa.gov/repairstation.asp. 

•	 Next to the headings: “Partial Name,” “City,” “State,” and/or “Country,” enter 

any information you have. 

•	 You may also select any specific types of repair you may need (e.g. Accessory, 

Airframe, Instrument, Limited Rating, Powerplant, Propeller, and Radio). 

•	 Select: “Search.” 

4. Comments Regarding Additions, Changes, and Deletions. If you have comments 

about the data accessed through the website (additions, changes, and deletions), please 

contact the Flight Standards District Office (FSDO) serving the area in which the FAA 

Certificated Repair Station is located. 

5. Comments Regarding the Content of This AC. Send your comments regarding the 

content of this AC to: FAA, Designee Standardization Branch, AFS-640, P.O. Box 

25082, Oklahoma City, OK 73125. 

/s/ Joseph K. Tintera 

Joseph K. Tintera 

Manager, Regulatory Support Division
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>      THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL
              INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE QUAZON CORP.
              FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30,
              1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
              TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
<MULTIPLIER>  1

<S>                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                   JAN-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           1,001
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,001
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,001
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,677
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,991
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,847,740
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,001
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,987
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 750
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (8,737)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (8,737)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (8,737)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.00)


</TABLE>
###### Editorial Note on [Part 1926](/current/title-29/part-1926?toc=1)

#### Editorial Notes:

1. At [44 FR 8577](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/44-FR-8577), Feb. 9, 1979, and corrected at [44 FR 20940](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/44-FR-20940), Apr. 6, 1979, OSHA reprinted without change the entire text of [29 CFR part 1926](/on/2024-09-23/title-29/part-1926) together with certain General Industry Occupational Safety and Health Standards contained in [29 CFR part 1910](/on/2024-09-23/title-29/part-1910), which have been identified as also applicable to construction work. This republication developed a single set of OSHA regulations for both labor and management forces within the construction industry.

2. Nomenclature changes to part 1926 appear at [84 FR 21597](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/84-FR-21597), May 14, 2019.

#### § 1926.1071 Scope and application.

Note:

The requirements applicable to construction work under this section are identical to those set forth at [§ 1910.401 of this chapter](/on/2024-09-23/title-29/section-1910.401).

[[61 FR 31432](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/61-FR-31432), June 20, 1996]
#### § 1211.540 Advertising.

A recipient shall not in any advertising related to employment indicate preference, limitation, specification, or discrimination based on sex unless sex is a bona fide occupational qualification for the particular job in question.
# EUR-Lex - 12005SP043 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12005SP043

**Protocol concerning the conditions and arrangements for admission of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania to the European Union - PART FIVE:PROVISIONS RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THIS PROTOCOL - TITLE I:SETTING UP OF THE INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES - Article 43 **

*
Official Journal L 157 , 21/06/2005 P. 0042 - 0042 *

Article 43

The European Parliament shall make such adaptations to its Rules of Procedure as are rendered necessary by accession.

--------------------------------------------------
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-50177 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ANTHONY LEON CEPHUS, also known as Anthony L. Cephus, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. W-97-CR-62-1

- - - - - - - - - - October 21, 1999 Before JOLLY, JONES, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Anthony Leon Cephus appeals the district court’s revocation of his supervised release. He argues that the district court abused its discretion in revoking his supervised release because the Government failed to offer sufficient evidence to establish a nexus between himself and the plastic bag containing the “crack” cocaine found in his backyard. Supervised release may be revoked upon a finding, by a preponderance of the evidence, that a defendant violated aNo. 99-50177 -2- condition of his supervised release. 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3); United States v. McCormick , 54 F.3d 214, 219 (5th Cir. 1995). This court reviews the district court’s decision for an abuse of discretion. Id. In considering a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence, this court views “the evidence and all reasonable inferences that may be drawn from the evidence in a light most favorable to the government." United States v. Alaniz-Alaniz , 38 F.3d 788, 792 (5th Cir. 1994) (internal citation omitted). This court does not pass on a district court's determination as to the credibility of the witnesses. Id. at 791. Accepting all reasonable credibility choices that tend to support the judge’s decision, the evidence, when viewed in its entirety, is sufficient to establish that Cephus violated the conditions of his supervised release. United States v. Cardenas , 748 F.2d 1015, 1020 (5th Cir. 1984).
AFFIRMED.
#### § 1915.1030 Bloodborne pathogens.

Note:

The requirements applicable to shipyard employment under this section are identical to those set forth at [§ 1910.1030 of this chapter](/on/2024-09-23/title-29/section-1910.1030).

[[61 FR 31431](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/61-FR-31431), June 20, 1996]
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)
 Company
 (i)
    
    the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006
(the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(ii)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Dated: March 30, 2007
    /s/ Mark M. SalterMark M. SalterChief Executive Officer
#### § 223.60 Determining fair market value.

The objective of Forest Service timber appraisals is to determine fair market value. Fair market value is estimated by such methods as are authorized by the Chief, Forest Service, through issuance of agency directives (36 CFR 200.4). Valid methods to determine fair market value include, but are not limited to, transaction evidence appraisals, analytical appraisals, comparison appraisals, and independent estimates based on average investments. Pertinent factors affecting market value also considered include, but are not limited to, prices paid and valuations established for comparable timber, selling value of products produced, estimated operating costs, operating difficulties, and quality of timber. Considerations and valuations may recognize and adjust for factors which are not normal market influences.

[61 FR 5685, Feb. 14, 1996]