alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EUR-Lex - 12005SA023 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12005SA023

**Act concerning the conditions of accession of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania and the adjustments to the Treaties on which the European Union is founded - PART FOUR:TEMPORARY PROVISIONS - TITLE I:TRANSITIONAL MEASURES - Article 23 **

*
Official Journal L 157 , 21/06/2005 P. 0211 - 0211 *

Article 23

The measures listed in Annexes VI and VII to this Act shall apply in respect of Bulgaria and Romania under the conditions laid down in those Annexes.

--------------------------------------------------
###### Editorial Note on [Part 1926](/current/title-29/part-1926?toc=1)

#### Editorial Notes:

1. At [44 FR 8577](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/44-FR-8577), Feb. 9, 1979, and corrected at [44 FR 20940](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/44-FR-20940), Apr. 6, 1979, OSHA reprinted without change the entire text of [29 CFR part 1926](/on/2024-09-23/title-29/part-1926) together with certain General Industry Occupational Safety and Health Standards contained in [29 CFR part 1910](/on/2024-09-23/title-29/part-1910), which have been identified as also applicable to construction work. This republication developed a single set of OSHA regulations for both labor and management forces within the construction industry.

2. Nomenclature changes to part 1926 appear at [84 FR 21597](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/84-FR-21597), May 14, 2019.

#### § 1926.1083 Post-dive procedures.

Note:

The requirements applicable to construction work under this section are identical to those set forth at [§ 1910.423 of this chapter](/on/2024-09-23/title-29/section-1910.423).

[[61 FR 31432](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/61-FR-31432), June 20, 1996]
Pursuant to 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinionshould not * be publishe d an d is not precedent except under the limited circu mstance s set forth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. 

### INTHE UNI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHE FIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 08- 51134 Su m m ar yC al endar

UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA, P l ai n t i f f

- A pp el l ee

v. S ERGI O CAS TI LL O- CHAVI RA , D e fe nda nt

- Appe l l ant

A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f or t h e W est ern D i st ri ctof T exas U SDC N o . 3 : 0 8

- CR- 1 4 0 5

- ALL

B ef ore K IN G , ST E W A R T , an d H AY N E S , C i rcui tJu dg es. P E R C U R I A M: * S ergi o C astil l o- C h avir a ( C astil l o) app eal s h is gu i l t y pl ea conv i ct i on f or i m p ortingm ore tha n 50 k i l og ra m s of m a rij u a n a . H e a rg u es th a t t h e m a gistrate j udg e pl ai nl y e r r e d i n fai l i ng t o a dv i s e hi m o f t he de fe ns e o f

dur e s s a nd t hatt he di s t r i c tc o ur t e r r e d w he n i t ad o pt e d t he m ag i s t r at e j udg e ’ s r e c o m m e nda t i o n a nd
ac c ept ed Cast i l l o’ s gui l t y pl ea. W h en , as here, a defen da n t argu es f or t h e f i rst t i m e on ap pea l t h at t h ere
w as a n i ns uf

f i c i e ntfac t ual ba s i s f

o r hi s guil t y pl e a, t hi s c o ur tr e vi e w s t he i s s ue United States Court of App eals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D Februar y 26, 2010 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I Clerk Case: 08-51134 Document: 00511037287 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/26/2010N o. 08- 51134

2 fo rp la in e r r o r . Uni t e d St at e s v . Cas t r o - Tr e v i no , 464 F

. 3d 536 , 540

- 41 (5t h C i r. 200 6)

. R u l e 11 contai n s no provi si on requi ri n g t h e di st ri ctcourtt o adv i se a de fe nda nto f

po s s ibl e de fe ns e s . Fur t he r , Cas t i l l o ha s fai l e d t o i de nt i f y, a nd t he
r e c o r d d o e s n o t d is c lo s e , a n yR u le 1 1 v io la tio n . N o r d id th e fa c tu a l b a s is s u p p ly fac t s t r i gg e r i ng a dut y o n t he par tof t he di s t r i c tco ur tt o a dv i s e Cas t i l l o o f t he d e fe n s e . Cf. Un i t e dS t a t e s v . A d a ms , 56 6 F

. 2 d96 2 , 96 8 ( 5 th C i r. 19 7 8 ). L a st, C asti l l o’ s r el i an ce on fact s i n t h e P resentence R eport t o sup po rt a d efen se of du ress i s s peci ou s i n sofar a s those fact s w ere n otb ef ore the court du ri n g t h e pl ea c ol l oquy. C as t i l l o a l so ar gues t hat , i n l i ghtof t he di st r i c tc our t ’ s st at em ent s at
sen ten ci n g, t h e cou rt sh ou l d h a ve su a sp on te set as i d e th e p l ea a g r ee m en t. C asti l l o, how ever, di d n otfi l e a m ot i on t o w i t h draw hi s gui l t y pl ea. M oreover, t h e cases on w h i ch h e rel i es an d are n ot an al ogou s. Th u s, C astil l o fai l s t o show th a t t h e d is tr ic t c o u r t’s fa ilu r e t o s u a s p o n te s e t a s id e t h e g u iltyp le a w a s p la in
error . AF F I RMED. Case: 08-51134 Document: 00511037287 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/26/2010
# EUR-Lex - 12002E097 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 12002E097

**Treaty establishing the European Community (Nice consolidated version) - Part Three: Community policies - Title VI: Common rules on competition, taxation and approximation of laws - Chapter 3: Approximation of laws - Article 97 - Article 102 - EC Treaty (Maastricht consolidated version) - Article 102 - EEC Treaty **

*
Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0070 - 0071 Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0215 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0033 - Consolidated version (EEC Treaty - no official publication available) *

Treaty establishing the European Community (Nice consolidated version)

Part Three: Community policies

Title VI: Common rules on competition, taxation and approximation of laws

Chapter 3: Approximation of laws

Article 97

Article 102 - EC Treaty (Maastricht consolidated version)

Article 102 - EEC Treaty

Article 97

1. Where there is a reason to fear that the adoption or amendment of a provision laid down by law, regulation or administrative action may cause distortion within the meaning of Article 96, a Member State desiring to proceed therewith shall consult the Commission. After consulting the Member States, the Commission shall recommend to the States concerned such measures as may be appropriate to avoid the distortion in question.

2. If a State desiring to introduce or amend its own provisions does not comply with the recommendation addressed to it by the Commission, other Member States shall not be required, pursuant to Article 96, to amend their own provisions in order to eliminate such distortion. If the Member State which has ignored the recommendation of the Commission causes distortion detrimental only to itself, the provisions of Article 96 shall not apply.
§ 1211.535 Effect of state or local law or other requirements. ( a ) *Prohibitory requirements.* The obligation to comply with §§ 1211.500 through 1211.550 is not obviated or alleviated by the existence of any State or local law or other requirement that imposes prohibitions or limits upon employment of members of one sex that are not imposed upon members of the other sex.
( b ) *Benefits.* A recipient that provides any compensation, service, or benefit to members of one sex pursuant to a State or local law or other requirement shall provide the same compensation, service, or benefit to members of the other sex.
EXHIBIT 12.1

XTO ENERGY INC.

COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES



|                                                                    |      |                        |       |  |      |     |      |   |      |  |   |     |  |   |    
|------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---- | ---------------------- | ----- |  | ---- | --- | ---- | - | ---- |  | - | --- |  | - | ---
|(in millions, except ratios)                                        |      | Year Ended December 31
|                                                                    | 2005 |                        | 2004  |  | 2003 |     | 2002 |   | 2001
|Income before income tax and cumulative effect of accounting change |      | $                      | 1,810 |  | $    | 826 |      | $ | 444  |  | $ | 287 |  | $ | 455
|Interest expense                                                    |      |                        | 154   |  |      | 94  |      |   | 64   |  |   | 54  |  |   | 56 
|Interest portion of rentals                                         |      |                        | 8     |  |      | 7   |      |   | 9    |  |   | 3   |  |   | 4  
|                                                                    |      |                        |       |  |      |     |      |   |      |  |   |     |  |   |    
|Earnings before provision for taxes and fixed charges               |      | $                      | 1,972 |  | $    | 927 |      | $ | 517  |  | $ | 344 |  | $ | 515
|                                                                    |      |                        |       |  |      |     |      |   |      |  |   |     |  |   |    
|Interest expense                                                    |      | $                      | 154   |  | $    | 94  |      | $ | 64   |  | $ | 54  |  | $ | 56 
|Capitalized interest                                                |      |                        | 6     |  |      | 3   |      |   | 2    |  |   | 4   |  |   | 7  
|Interest portion of rentals                                         |      |                        | 8     |  |      | 7   |      |   | 9    |  |   | 3   |  |   | 4  
|                                                                    |      |                        |       |  |      |     |      |   |      |  |   |     |  |   |    
|Total Fixed Charges                                                 |      | $                      | 168   |  | $    | 104 |      | $ | 75   |  | $ | 61  |  | $ | 67 
|                                                                    |      |                        |       |  |      |     |      |   |      |  |   |     |  |   |    
|Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges                                  |      |                        | 11.7  |  |      | 8.9 |      |   | 6.9  |  |   | 5.6 |  |   | 7.7
§ 253.51 Apportionment. ( a ) *Apportionment formula.* The amount of funds apportioned to each state is to be determined by the Secretary as the ratio which the equally weighted average of the volume and value of fishery resources harvested by domestic commercial fishermen and landed within such state during the 3 most recent calendar years for which data satisfactory to the Secretary are available bears to the total equally weighted average of the volume and value of all fishery resources harvested by domestic commercial fishermen and landed within all of the states during those calendar years. ( 1 ) The equally weighted average value is determined by the following formula:
( 2 ) Upon appropriation of funds by Congress, the Secretary will take the following actions: ( i ) Determine each state's share according to the apportionment formula.
( ii ) Certify the funds to the respective NMFS Regional Director.
( iii ) Instruct NMFS Regional Directors to promptly notify states of funds' availability.
( b ) No state, under the apportionment formula in paragraph (a) of this section, that has a ratio of one-third of 1 percent or higher may receive an apportionment for any fiscal year that is less than 1 percent of the total amount of funds available for that fiscal year.
( c ) If a State's ratio under the apportionment formula in paragraph (b) of this section is less than one-third of 1 percent, that state may receive funding if the state: ( 1 ) Is signatory to an interstate fishery compact;
( 2 ) Has entered into an enforcement agreement with the Secretary and/or the Secretary of the Interior for a fishery that is managed under an interstate fishery management plan;
( 3 ) Borders one or more of the Great Lakes;
( 4 ) Has entered into an interstate cooperative fishery management agreement and has in effect an interstate fisheries management plan or an interstate fisheries research Program; or
( 5 ) Has adopted a Federal fishery management plan for an interjurisdictional fishery resource.
( d ) Any state that has a ratio of less than one-third of 1 percent and meets any of the requirements set forth in paragraphs (c)(1) through (5) of this section may receive an apportionment for any fiscal year that is not less than 0.5 percent of the total amount of funds available for apportionment for such fiscal year.
( e ) No state may receive an apportionment under this section for any fiscal year that is more than 6 percent of the total amount of funds available for apportionment for such fiscal year.
( f ) *Unused apportionments.* Any part of an apportionment for any fiscal year to any state: ( 1 ) That is not obligated during that year;
( 2 ) With respect to which the state notifies the Secretary that it does not wish to receive that part; or
( 3 ) That is returned to the Secretary by the state, may not be considered to be appropriated to that state and must be added to such funds as are appropriated for the next fiscal year. Any notification or return of funds by a state referred to in this section is irrevocable.
|   | (1) | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/       Philip D.      Ellett              |   |   |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| Philip      D. EllettChief      Executive OfficerFebruary      19, 2008                                            |   |   |   |
###### Editorial Note on Part 679

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 679 appear at 61 FR 56438, Nov. 1, 1996; 62 FR 2047, Jan. 15, 1997; 66 FR 27909, May 21, 2001; 67 FR 79739, Dec. 30, 2002; and 77 FR 6502, Feb. 8, 2012.

#### § 679.9 Penalties.

See § 600.735 of this chapter.
USDANEWS      VOLUME 57 NO.3 -APRIL 1998
#### § 14.8 Unauthorized occupancy.

Any occupancy or use of the lands of the United States without authority will subject the person occupying or using the land to prosecution and liability for trespass.
#### § 82.19 Patents and inventions.

Determination of the patent rights in any inventions or discoveries resulting from work under cooperative agreements entered into pursuant to the Act shall be governed by the “Government Patent Policy,” President's Memorandum for Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies, August 23, 1971, and statement of government patent policy as printed in 36 FR 16889.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Balance Sheet for Idaho Technical, Inc. at November 30, 1999 and the
Statement of Operations for the period ended November 30, 1999 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.

</LEGEND>



<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,715
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        13,986
<OTHER-SE>                                     (90,572)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,715
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1,715)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1,715)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,715)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00



</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk June 25, 2012

t0618 

# Order

June 25, 2012

144779 & (54)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 144779

COA: 300861

Wayne CC: 10

- 000515

- FC

BERNARD ANTONIO IVORY,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 15, 2011

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion to

st ay proceedings is DENIED.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21 - 0245 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. ANDREW ORLANDO BIGLEGGINS,

Defendant and Appellant.

**G RANT**  Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the Appellant is given an extension of time until January 18 , 202 3 , to prepare, file, and serve the Appellant’s reply brief. No further extensions will be granted.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 8 2022

12/08/2022
Case Number: DA 21-0254
Exhibit 23.1




CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 To the
Board of Directors and Shareholders of The Quigley Corporation:
 
 We
consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form S-8
(No. 333-73456, No. 333-61313, No. 333-10059, No. 333-14687, 333-26589 and
333-132770) and Form S-3 (No. 333-31241, 333-86976, 333-104148 and 333-119748)
of The Quigley Corporation and subsidiaries ("the Company") of our report dated
March 7, 2008 with respect to the consolidated financial statements for each of
the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007, and the
effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting as of December 31,
2007, which report appears in the December 31, 2007 Annual Report on Form
10-K.
 
 
 /s/
Amper, Politziner & Mattia, P.C.
 
 Edison,
New Jersey
 March 7,
2008
# EUR-Lex - 12008M/PRO/14 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008M/PRO/14

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on European Union - PROTOCOLS - Protocol (No 14) on the Euro Group **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0283 - 0283 *

PROTOCOL (No 14)

ON THE EURO GROUP

THE HIGH CONTRACTING PARTIES,

DESIRING to promote conditions for stronger economic growth in the European Union and, to that end, to develop ever-closer coordination of economic policies within the euro area,

CONSCIOUS of the need to lay down special provisions for enhanced dialogue between the Member States whose currency is the euro, pending the euro becoming the currency of all Member States of the Union,

HAVE AGREED UPON the following provisions, which shall be annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union:

Article 1

The Ministers of the Member States whose currency is the euro shall meet informally. Such meetings shall take place, when necessary, to discuss questions related to the specific responsibilities they share with regard to the single currency. The Commission shall take part in the meetings. The European Central Bank shall be invited to take part in such meetings, which shall be prepared by the representatives of the Ministers with responsibility for finance of the Member States whose currency is the euro and of the Commission.

Article 2

The Ministers of the Member States whose currency is the euro shall elect a president for two and a half years, by a majority of those Member States.

--------------------------------------------------
§ 92.12 Relationship to the process for developing national hunting regulations for migratory game birds. ( a ) *Flyway councils.* ( 1 ) Proposed annual regulations recommended by the Co-management Council will be submitted to all flyway councils for review and comment. The Council's recommendations must be submitted prior to the SRC's last regular meeting of the calendar year in order to be approved for spring/summer harvest beginning March 11 of the following calendar year.
( 2 ) Alaska Native representatives may be appointed by the Co-management Council to attend meetings of one or more of the four flyway councils to discuss recommended regulations or other proposed management actions.
( b ) *Service regulations committee.* Proposed annual regulations recommended by the Co-management Council will be submitted to the Service Regulations Committee for their review and recommendation to the Service Director. Following the Service Director's review and recommendation, the proposals will be forwarded to the Department of Interior for approval. Proposed annual regulations will then be published in the Federal Register for public review and comment, similar to the annual migratory game bird hunting regulations (found in part 20 of this chapter). Final spring/summer regulations for Alaska will be published in the Federal Register in the preceding Fall.
Exhibit 10.3
​
FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE
ENTASIS THERAPEUTICS HOLDINGS INC.
2018 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN
​
WHEREAS, Entasis Therapeutics Holdings Inc., (the “Company”), sponsors the 2018 Equity Incentive Plan, which was adopted by the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) on September 13, 2018, and approved by the Company’s stockholders on September 14, 2018 (the “Plan”);
​
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 2(b) of the Plan, the Board may amend the Plan at any time; and
​
WHEREAS, the Board wishes to amend the Plan to increase the number of shares available for awards under the Plan by 500,000 shares;
​
NOW, THEREFORE, effective June 10, 2020, the first sentence of Section 3 (“Shares Subject to the Plan”), subsection (a) (“Share Reserve”), of the Plan is amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:
​
“Share Reserve. Subject to Section 9(a) relating to Capitalization Adjustments, and the following sentence regarding the annual increase, the aggregate number of shares of Common Stock that may be issued pursuant to Stock Awards will not exceed 2,850,000 shares (the “Share Reserve”).”
​
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this First Amendment to the Plan has been executed on behalf of the Company this 4th day of August, 2020.
​
​
​
​
	​


	​


	​



	​
	ENTASIS THERAPEUTICS HOLDINGS INC.

	​
	​
	​

	​
	By:
	 /s/ David Meek

	​
	​
	David Meek

	​
	​
	Chairman of the Board



​