alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 5197 

To establish a rule of construction regarding consent for disclosure of personally identifiable information under the Family Educational Rights and 

Privacy Act of 1974. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 25, 2024 

Mr. LEE (for himself and Mr. SCHMITT) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, 

Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To establish a rule of construction regarding consent for 

disclosure of personally identifiable information under 

the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Student Voter Data 

5 Protection Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FERPA RULE. 

7 Section 444 of the General Education Provisions Act 

8 (20 U.S.C. 1232g, commonly known as the ‘‘Family EduVerDate Sep 11 2014 03:04 Oct 09, 2024 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S5197.IS S5197

ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 5197 IS

1 cational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974’’) is amended by 

2 adding at the end the following: 

3 ‘‘(k) Nothing in this section shall be interpreted or 

4 construed to allow an educational agency or institution to 

5 disclose personally identifiable information, including di6 rectory information, from a student for the purpose of 

7 measuring voter registration or the voting rates of stu8 dents enrolled at an institution of higher education, with9 out the consent required by this section, including consent 

10 specified in section 99.30 of title 34, Code of Federal Reg11 ulations (or any successor regulations).’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
# EUR-Lex - 12004V438 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V438

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART IV — GENERAL AND FINAL PROVISIONS - Article IV-438 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0187 - 0187 *

Article IV-438

Succession and legal continuity

1. The European Union established by this Treaty shall be the successor to the European Union established by the Treaty on European Union and to the European Community.

2. Until new provisions have been adopted in implementation of this Treaty or until the end of their term of office, the institutions, bodies, offices and agencies existing on the date of the entry into force of this Treaty shall, subject to Article IV-439, exercise their powers within the meaning of this Treaty in their composition on that date.

3. The acts of the institutions, bodies, offices and agencies adopted on the basis of the treaties and acts repealed by Article IV-437 shall remain in force. Their legal effects shall be preserved until those acts are repealed, annulled or amended in implementation of this Treaty. The same shall apply to agreements concluded between Member States on the basis of the treaties and acts repealed by Article IV-437.

The other components of theacquisof the Community and of the Union existing at the time of the entry into force of this Treaty, in particular the interinstitutional agreements, decisions and agreements arrived at by the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States, meeting within the Council, the agreements concluded by the Member States on the functioning of the Union or of the Community or linked to action by the Union or by the Community, the declarations, including those made in the context of intergovernmental conferences, as well as the resolutions or other positions adopted by the European Council or the Council and those relating to the Union or to the Community adopted by common accord by the Member States, shall also be preserved until they have been deleted or amended.

4. The case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Communities and of the Court of First Instance on the interpretation and application of the treaties and acts repealed by Article IV-437, as well as of the acts and conventions adopted for their application, shall remain, mutatis mutandis, the source of interpretation of Union law and in particular of the comparable provisions of the Constitution.

5. Continuity in administrative and legal procedures commenced prior to the date of entry into force of this Treaty shall be ensured in compliance with the Constitution. The institutions, bodies, offices and agencies responsible for those procedures shall take all appropriate measures to that effect.

--------------------------------------------------
# EUR-Lex - 12008E/AFI/DCL/42 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008E/AFI/DCL/42

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - DECLARATIONS annexed to the Final Act of the Intergovernmental Conference which adopted the Treaty of Lisbon, signed on 13 December 2007 - A. DECLARATIONS CONCERNING PROVISIONS OF THE TREATIES - 42. Declaration on Article 352 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0351 - 0351 *

42. Declaration on Article 352 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

The Conference underlines that, in accordance with the settled case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union, Article 352 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, being an integral part of an institutional system based on the principle of conferred powers, cannot serve as a basis for widening the scope of Union powers beyond the general framework created by the provisions of the Treaties as a whole and, in particular, by those that define the tasks and the activities of the Union. In any event, this Article cannot be used as a basis for the adoption of provisions whose effect would, in substance, be to amend the Treaties without following the procedure which they provide for that purpose.

--------------------------------------------------
# EUR-Lex - 12008E125 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008E125

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - PART THREE: UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS - TITLE VIII: ECONOMIC AND MONETARY POLICY - Chapter 1: Economic policy - Article 125 (ex Article 103 TEC) **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0099 - 0099 *

Article 125

(ex Article 103 TEC)

1. The Union shall not be liable for or assume the commitments of central governments, regional, local or other public authorities, other bodies governed by public law, or public undertakings of any Member State, without prejudice to mutual financial guarantees for the joint execution of a specific project. A Member State shall not be liable for or assume the commitments of central governments, regional, local or other public authorities, other bodies governed by public law, or public undertakings of another Member State, without prejudice to mutual financial guarantees for the joint execution of a specific project.

2. The Council, on a proposal from the Commission and after consulting the European Parliament, may, as required, specify definitions for the application of the prohibitions referred to in Articles 123 and 124 and in this Article.

--------------------------------------------------
#### § 223.62 Timber purchaser road construction credit.

Appraisal may also establish stumpage value as if unconstructed roads or other developments needed by the purchaser for removal of the timber were in place. When timber is appraised and sold on such basis, *purchaser credit* for road construction, not to exceed the estimated construction cost of such roads or other developments specified in the timber sale contract, shall, when such construction is accomplished by purchaser, be deducted from stumpage payments made by or due from purchaser under the timber sale contract for other than minimum stumpage rates and required deposits for slash disposal and road maintenance. As used in this section *estimated construction costs* means the total cost of constructing all permanent roads specified in the timber sale contract, estimated as if construction is to be accomplished by an independent contractor who is not the timber purchaser. In determining the purchaser credit amount applicable against timber payments, the estimated construction cost may be reduced for the effect of differences in applicable wage rates.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-6108
ANTHONY LEON HOOVER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus THOMAS J. KEITH; PANSY D. GLANTOR, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr., District Judge. (CA-04-1047) Submitted: May 12, 2005 Decided: May 18, 2005 Before TRAXLER, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Anthony Leon Hoover, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Anthony Leon Hoover seeks to appeal the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissing his complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially on the reasoning of the district court. See Hoover v. Keith , No. CA04-1047 (M.D.N.C. Jan. 4, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Veterans Affairs

The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under the Public Law 92-463 (Federal Advisory Committee Act) that a meeting of the Advisory Committee on CARES Business Plan Studies will be held on October 19, 2006, from 4 p.m. to 8 p.m. at the VA Medical Center Saint Albans Campus, Pratt Auditorium, 179-00 Linden Boulevard, St. Albans, NY. The meeting is open to the public.

                    The purpose of the Committee is to provide advice to the Secretary of                           ( print page 58480)                        Veterans Affairs on proposed business plans at those VA facility sites identified in May 2004 as requiring further study by the Capital Asset Realignment for Enhanced Services (CARES) Decision document The agenda will include a discussion of the summary of the proposed space plan and siting of new multi-specialty outpatient clinic on the VA Medical Center St. Albans campus.                

                    Interested persons may attend and present oral or written statements to the Committee. For additional information regarding the meetings, please contact Mr. Jay Halpern, Designated Federal Officer, (00CARES), 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20024 by phone at (202) 273-5994, or by e-mail at                     *jay.halpern@hq.med.va.gov.*

Dated: September 22, 2006.

By direction of the Secretary.

E. Philip Riggin,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 06-8405 Filed 10-2-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8320-01-M
§ 1002.14 Sanitation and refuse. ( a ) The following are prohibited: ( 1 ) Disposing of refuse in other than refuse receptacles.
( 2 ) Using government refuse receptacles or other refuse facilities for dumping household, commercial, or industrial refuse, brought as such from private or municipal property, except in accordance with conditions established by the Executive Director.
( 3 ) Depositing refuse in the plumbing fixtures or vaults of a toilet facility.
( 4 ) Draining refuse from a trailer or other vehicle, except in facilities provided for such purpose.
( 5 ) Bathing, or washing food, clothing, dishes, or other property at public water outlets, fixtures or pools, except at those designated for such purpose.
( 6 ) Polluting or contaminating waters or water courses within the area administered by the Presidio Trust.
( 7 ) Disposing of fish remains on land, or in waters within 200 feet of boat docks or designated swimming beaches, or within developed areas, except as otherwise designated.
( 8 ) In developed areas, the disposal of human body waste, except at designated locations or in fixtures provided for that purpose.
( 9 ) In nondeveloped areas, the disposal of human body waste within 100 feet of a water source, high water mark of a body of water, or a campsite, or within sight of a trail, except as otherwise designated.
( b ) The Board may establish conditions concerning the disposal, containerization, or carryout of human body waste. Violation of these conditions is prohibited.
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of  Regma Bio Technologies Limited ( the "Company" ) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the hereof ( the "Report" ), I, Dr. David D. Rooke, President, Chief Executive officer of the Company and a member of the Board of Directors, certify, pursuant to s.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

	
the information contained in the Report fairly represents, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

Signed, Dr. David J. RookeDr. David J. RookeChief Executive OfficerAugust 14, 2002

 

 

----
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
                      SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies that:

         1.       The Annual Report on Form 10-K of SPSS Inc. for the period
                  ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and
                  Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), fully
                  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of SPSS Inc.

Date: July 29, 2004                By: /s/  JACK NOONAN
                                      ---------------------------------------
                                       Jack Noonan
                                       President and Chief Executive Officer
Case 16-27020 Doc 1 Filed 08/23/16 Entered 08/23/16 12:33:05 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 10
Case 16-27020 Doc 1 Filed 08/23/16 Entered 08/23/16 12:33:05 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 10
Case 16-27020 Doc 1 Filed 08/23/16 Entered 08/23/16 12:33:05 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 10
Case 16-27020 Doc 1 Filed 08/23/16 Entered 08/23/16 12:33:05 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 10
Case 16-27020 Doc 1 Filed 08/23/16 Entered 08/23/16 12:33:05 Desc Main

 Document Page 5 of 10
Case 16-27020 Doc 1 Filed 08/23/16 Entered 08/23/16 12:33:05 Desc Main

 Document Page 6 of 10
Case 16-27020 Doc 1 Filed 08/23/16 Entered 08/23/16 12:33:05 Desc Main

 Document Page 7 of 10
Case 16-27020 Doc 1 Filed 08/23/16 Entered 08/23/16 12:33:05 Desc Main

 Document Page 8 of 10
Case 16-27020 Doc 1 Filed 08/23/16 Entered 08/23/16 12:33:05 Desc Main

 Document Page 9 of 10
Case 16-27020 Doc 1 Filed 08/23/16 Entered 08/23/16 12:33:05 Desc Main

 Document Page 10 of 10
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Trade balance report[electronic resource].**
 
SuDoc Number:C 61.51:
Item Number:0231-B-27 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000488332
 
1999: 040609
2000: 07| 2002: 050712 | 2003: 040810 | 2004: 04060711 | 2005: 0110
 
February 24, 2020
#### §§ 1154.112-1154.129 [Reserved]
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

E.S., the Mother,

Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, and 

the GUARDIAN AD LITEM PROGRAM,

Appellees.

No. 4D17-2183

[November 1, 2017]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, 

Indian River County; J. David Langford, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

312015DP000060.

Crystal J. Marsh of Marsh Law Firm, P.A., Port Saint Lucie, for 

appellant.

Laura J. Lee, Sanford, for appellee Guardian ad Litem Program.

Kelley Schaeffer, Bradenton, for appellee Department of Children and 

Families.

PER CURIAM.

In a fifty-five page final judgment terminating the parental rights of the 

mother to her son, the trial court reviewed the extensive evidence of 

medical neglect and the mother’s breach of her case plan. The mother 

primarily argues on appeal that competent, substantial evidence does not 

support the trial court’s detailed findings, nor is the evidence clear and 

convincing. We affirm. 

On review, the task of the appellate court:

is not to conduct a de novo proceeding, reweigh the testimony 

and evidence given at the trial court, or substitute our 

judgment for that of the trier of fact. Instead, we will uphold 

the trial court's finding “[i]f, upon the pleadings and evidence 

before the trial court, there is any theory or principle of law 
2

which would support the trial court's judgment in favor of 

terminating ... parental rights.”

In re Adoption of Baby E.A.W., 658 So. 2d 961, 967 (Fla. 1995) (quoting 

Kingsley v. Kingsley, 623 So. 2d 780, 787 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993)). This 

record is replete with evidence to support the findings of the trial court.

Appellant’s challenges to the expert witnesses on the extent of the 

records they reviewed to support their opinions were not preserved. In any 

event, this would go to the weight of their testimony, not to its 

admissibility. See Nat Harrison Associates, Inc. v. Byrd, 256 So. 2d 50, 53 

(Fla. 4th DCA 1971). As to her claim that non-experts were allowed to give 

speculative expert opinions, these issues were also not preserved, nor does 

the record support appellant’s claim that the witnesses were not 

sufficiently qualified to offer their opinions.

The court found, and the record supports: the grounds for termination; 

that termination was the least restrictive means to prevent further harm 

to the child; and that it is manifestly in the child’s best interest that the 

mother’s rights be terminated. We commend the trial court for its 

thorough, well-reasoned final judgment, which we affirm.

WARNER, GROSS and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
# Map            Jamaica.
# EUR-Lex - 12007L/AFI/DCL/26 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12007L/AFI/DCL/26

**Treaty of Lisbon amending the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Community, signed at Lisbon, 13 December 2007 - A. Declarations concerning provisions of the Treaties - 26. Declaration on non-participation by a Member State in a measure based on Title IV of Part Three of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union **

*
Official Journal 306 , 17/12/2007 P. 0258 - 0258 *

26. Declaration on non-participation by a Member State in a measure based on Title IV of Part Three of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

The Conference declares that, where a Member State opts not to participate in a measure based on Title IV of Part Three of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the Council will hold a full discussion on the possible implications and effects of that Member State's non-participation in the measure.

In addition, any Member State may ask the Commission to examine the situation on the basis of Article 96 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

The above paragraphs are without prejudice to the entitlement of a Member State to refer the matter to the European Council.

--------------------------------------------------
# EUR-Lex - 12007P042 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12007P042

**Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - TITLE V - CITIZENS' RIGHTS - Article 42 - Right of access to documents **

*
Official Journal 303 , 14/12/2007 P. 0011 - 0011 *

Article 42

Right of access to documents

Any citizen of the Union, and any natural or legal person residing or having its registered office in a Member State, has a right of access to documents of the institutions, bodies, offices and agencies of the Union, whatever their medium.

--------------------------------------------------
**Exhibit 99.2**

 

**Certifications**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, each of the undersignedofficers of TELUS Corporation (“TELUS”) hereby certifies that to his knowledge,(a) the annual report for the period ended December 31, 2009 (the “Report”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and (b) theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of TELUS.

 
| Date:  March 12, 2010.                           |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                  |   |
| *“Darren  Entwistle”*                       |   |
| Darren  Entwistle                                     |   |
| President  and Chief Executive Officer                |   |
|                                                  |   |
|                                                  |   |
| Date:  March 12, 2010.                           |   |
|                                                  |   |
| *“Robert  G. McFarlane”*                    |   |
| Robert  G. McFarlane                                  |   |
| Executive  Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

----