alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EUR-Lex - 11957A037 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11957A037

**TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN ATOMIC ENERGY COMMUNITY ( E.A.E.C. - EURATOM ), TITLE TWO - PROVISIONS FOR THE ENCOURAGEMENT OF PROGRESS IN THE FIELD OF NUCLEAR ENERGY, CHAPTER III: HEALTH AND SAFETY, ARTICLE 37 **

*

*

++++

ARTICLE 37

EACH MEMBER STATE SHALL PROVIDE THE COMMISSION WITH SUCH GENERAL DATA RELATING TO ANY PLAN FOR THE DISPOSAL OF RADIOACTIVE WASTE IN WHATEVER FORM AS WILL MAKE IT POSSIBLE TO DETERMINE WHETHER THE IMPLEMENTATION OF SUCH PLAN IS LIABLE TO RESULT IN THE RADIOACTIVE CONTAMINATION OF THE WATER , SOIL OR AIRSPACE OF ANOTHER MEMBER STATE .

THE COMMISSION SHALL DELIVER ITS OPINION WITHIN SIX MONTHS , AFTER CONSULTING THE GROUP OF EXPERTS REFERRED TO IN ARTICLE 31 .
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**1447 KA 13-00678**  PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., FAHEY, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND WHALEN, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
TITO ROOSEVELT, ALSO KNOWN AS SAMUEL GAMBLIN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 2.)

THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (DAVID J. RUDROFF OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
FRANK A. SEDITA, III, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (MATTHEW B. POWERS OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Erie County Court (Michael F. Pietruszka, J.), rendered March 18, 2013. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of promoting prison contraband in the first degree.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Same Memorandum as in People v Roosevelt ([appeal No. 1] ___ AD3d ___ [Feb. 6, 2015]).

Entered: February 6, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
Total U.S. Exports to  Tunisia

Data in Thousand Dollars 

Data For  JUN. 1999

|Group                  | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | Year to Date 6/1998 | Year to Date 6/1999 | % Change | Year Ending 6/1998 | Year Ending 6/1999 | % Change | % Share
|---------------------- | ---- | ---- | ---- | ---- | ------------------- | ------------------- | -------- | ------------------ | ------------------ | -------- | -------
|TEXTILES & APPAREL     | 1431 | 499  | 1627 | 1309 | 690                 | 1376                | 99.35    | 1651               | 1995               | 20.85    | 0.01   
|TOTAL APPAREL          | 25   | 12   | 107  | 146  | 34                  | 557                 | 1556.76  | 140                | 669                | 377.1    | 0.01   
|TEXTILE MILL PRODUCTS  | 1405 | 487  | 1520 | 1163 | 657                 | 820                 | 24.8     | 1511               | 1326               | -12.22   | 0.02   
|Fabric                 | 573  | 252  | 1036 | 824  | 382                 | 690                 | 80.62    | 884                | 1132               | 27.98    | 0.02   
|Made-Up Arts           | 57   | 50   | 286  | 313  | 261                 | 125                 | -52.1    | 458                | 177                | -61.26   | 0.01   
|Infants wear           |      | 0    | 0    | 112  | 0                   | 0                   |          | 0                  | 112                |          | 0.06   
|Other Apparel          | 9    |      | 0    | 0    | 0                   | 552                 |          | 0                  | 552                |          | 0.04   
|MMF Broadwoven Fabs    | 173  | 20   | 450  | 645  | 251                 | 295                 | 17.56    | 623                | 689                | 10.64    | 0.06   
|Knit & Knit Pile Fabs  | 130  | 0    | 21   | 32   | 32                  | 140                 | 339.38   | 53                 | 140                | 164.81   | 0.02   
|Speclty & Indstrl Fabs | 56   | 71   | 200  | 85   | 56                  | 185                 | 231.09   | 85                 | 213                | 150.23   | 0.01   
|Other Made-Up Articles | 48   | 7    | 65   | 57   | 5                   | 61                  | 1224.87  | 5                  | 114                | 2361.81  | 0.02
§ 13.1202 Fishing. Fishing is allowed in accordance with § 13.40 of this chapter, but only with artificial lures and with the following additional exceptions: ( a ) Bait, as defined by State law, may be used only on the Naknek River during times and dates established by the Alaska Department of Fish and Game, and only from markers located just above Trefon's cabin downstream to the park boundary.
( b ) Flyfishing only is allowed on the Brooks River between Brooks Lake and the posted signs near Brooks Camp.
( c ) No person may retain more than one fish per day caught on Brooks River, on the waters between the posted signs 200 yards from the outlet of Brooks Lake, or on the water between the posted signs 200 yards from the mouth of the Brooks River on Naknek Lake.
#### Harry T. Gause, on Behalf of Himself and Certain Other Creditors of the Commonwealth Trust Company, Appellant, *v.*George C. Boldt et al., Defendants, and Thomas J. Hallowell et al., Respondents.

(Argued February 26, 1907;

decided March 5, 1907.)

*Gause*v. *Boldt,*115 App. Div. 897, affirmed.

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered December 5, 1906, which affirmed a judgment of Special Term sustaining demurrers to the complaint in an action to establish a claim against the Commonwealth Trust Company and to enforce the statutory liability of its stockholders therefor.

*Howard Taylor'*for appellant.

*D. Cady*Herrick, *Francis 8. Hutchins*and *Frederick W. Garvin*for Commonwealth Trust Company et ah, respondents.

*ForTee Allen*for Arthur H. ITagemeyer, respondent.

*William M. Bennett*for Thomas J. Hallowell et ah, respondents.

*Per Gurimn.*

The trust company not having been dissolved and being subject to suit it was necessary for the plaintiff; to obtain a judgment • upon his olaim against it before bringing an action against its stockholders to enforce any liability on account of such claim. (Banking Law, § 162.) We do not deem it necessary or expedient at this time to express any opinion upon the effect of the other requirements of said statute which have been more or less discussed by counsel. '

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

Cullen, Ch. J., Edwabd T. Babtlett, Haight,. Yann, Weeneb, Willaed Babtlett and Hisoook, JJ"., concur.

Judgment affirmed.
# EUR-Lex - 12005SA011 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12005SA011

**Act concerning the conditions of accession of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania and the adjustments to the Treaties on which the European Union is founded - PART TWO:ADJUSTMENTS TO THE TREATIES - TITLE I:INSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS - Article 11 **

*
Official Journal L 157 , 21/06/2005 P. 0207 - 0207 *

Article 11

1. Article 9, first paragraph, of the Protocol annexed to the EU Treaty, the EC Treaty and the EAEC Treaty on the Statute of the Court of Justice shall be replaced by the following:

"When, every three years, the Judges are partially replaced, fourteen and thirteen Judges shall be replaced alternately.".

2. Article 48 of the Protocol annexed to the EU Treaty, the EC Treaty and the EAEC Treaty on the Statute of the Court of Justice shall be replaced by the following:

"Article 48

The Court of First Instance shall consist of twenty-seven Judges.".

--------------------------------------------------
# EUR-Lex - 12008E209 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008E209

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - PART FIVE: EXTERNAL ACTION BY THE UNION - TITLE III: COOPERATION WITH THIRD COUNTRIES AND HUMANITARIAN AID - Chapter 1: Development cooperation - Article 209 (ex Article 179 TEC) **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0141 - 0141 *

Article 209

(ex Article 179 TEC)

1. The European Parliament and the Council, acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure, shall adopt the measures necessary for the implementation of development cooperation policy, which may relate to multiannual cooperation programmes with developing countries or programmes with a thematic approach.

2. The Union may conclude with third countries and competent international organisations any agreement helping to achieve the objectives referred to in Article 21 of the Treaty on European Union and in Article 208 of this Treaty.

The first subparagraph shall be without prejudice to Member States' competence to negotiate in international bodies and to conclude agreements.

3. The European Investment Bank shall contribute, under the terms laid down in its Statute, to the implementation of the measures referred to in paragraph 1.

--------------------------------------------------
# EUR-Lex - 12008M/PRO/29 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008M/PRO/29

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on European Union - PROTOCOLS - Protocol (No 29) on the system of public broadcasting in the Member States **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0312 - 0312 *

PROTOCOL (No 29)

ON THE SYSTEM OF PUBLIC BROADCASTING IN THE MEMBER STATES

THE HIGH CONTRACTING PARTIES,

CONSIDERING that the system of public broadcasting in the Member States is directly related to the democratic, social and cultural needs of each society and to the need to preserve media pluralism,

HAVE AGREED UPON the following interpretive provisions, which shall be annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union:

The provisions of the Treaties shall be without prejudice to the competence of Member States to provide for the funding of public service broadcasting and in so far as such funding is granted to broadcasting organisations for the fulfilment of the public service remit as conferred, defined and organised by each Member State, and in so far as such funding does not affect trading conditions and competition in the Union to an extent which would be contrary to the common interest, while the realisation of the remit of that public service shall be taken into account.

--------------------------------------------------
#### § 14.36 Method of filing.

Any proposed transfer in whole or in part of any right, title or interest in a right-of-way, or permit incident to a right-of-way acquired under any law, except the Act of March 3, 1891 (26 Stat. 1101; 43 U.S.C. 946-949), must be filed in accordance with § 14.20 for approval, must be accompanied by the same showing of qualifications of the transferee as is required of the applicant, and must be supported by a stipulation that the assignee agrees to comply with and to be bound by the terms and conditions of the right-of-way. No transfer will be recognized unless and until it is first approved in writing by the authorized officer.
#### § 14.33 Order of cancellation.

All rights-of-way approved pursuant to this part, shall be subject to cancellation for the violation of any of the provisions of this part applicable thereto or for the violation of the terms or conditions of the right-of-way. No right-of-way shall be deemed to be cancelled except on the issuance of a specific order of cancellation.
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**592 CA 11-02280**  PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., FAHEY, PERADOTTO, AND LINDLEY, JJ.

RENEE JONES, CLAIMANT-APPELLANT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

CITY OF BUFFALO SCHOOL DISTRICT, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

CAMPBELL & SHELTON LLP, EDEN (R. COLIN CAMPBELL OF COUNSEL), FOR CLAIMANT-APPELLANT.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Diane Y. Devlin, J.), entered August 11, 2011 in a personal injury action. The order denied the motion of claimant to renew her prior application for leave to serve a late notice of claim.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Claimant appeals from an order denying her motion to renew a prior application for leave to serve a late notice of claim. It is well settled that “[a] motion for leave to renew ‘shall be based upon new facts not offered on the prior [application] that would change the prior determination’ . . ., and ‘shall contain reasonable justification for the failure to present such facts on the prior [application]’ ” ( Doe v North Tonawanda Cent. School Dist. , 91 AD3d 1283, 1284). Here, “[t]he motion to renew was properly denied [inasmuch as claimant] failed to offer a valid excuse for failing to submit the new material on the original [application]” ( Linden v Moskowitz , 294 AD2d 114, 116, lv denied 99 NY2d 505; see Schilling v Malark , 13 AD3d 1153, 1154).

Entered: April 20, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
# EUR-Lex - 12007L/AFI/DCL/45 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12007L/AFI/DCL/45

**Treaty of Lisbon amending the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Community, signed at Lisbon, 13 December 2007 - B. Declarations concerning Protocols annexed to the Treaties - 45. Declaration on Article 5(2) of the Protocol on the Schengen acquis integrated into the framework of the European Union **

*
Official Journal 306 , 17/12/2007 P. 0264 - 0264 *

45. Declaration on Article 5(2) of the Protocol on the Schengen acquis integrated into the framework of the European Union

The Conference declares that whenever the United Kingdom or Ireland indicates to the Council its intention not to participate in a measure building upon a part of the Schengen acquis in which it participates, the Council will have a full discussion on the possible implications of the non-participation of that Member State in that measure. The discussion within the Council should be conducted in the light of the indications given by the Commission concerning the relationship between the proposal and the Schengen acquis.

--------------------------------------------------
# EUR-Lex - 12007L/AFI/DCL/53 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12007L/AFI/DCL/53

**Treaty of Lisbon amending the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Community, signed at Lisbon, 13 December 2007 - B. Declarations concerning Protocols annexed to the Treaties - 53. Declaration by the Czech Republic on the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union **

*
Official Journal 306 , 17/12/2007 P. 0267 - 0268 *

53. Declaration by the Czech Republic on the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union

1. The Czech Republic recalls that the provisions of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union are addressed to the institutions and bodies of the European Union with due regard for the principle of subsidiarity and division of competences between the European Union and its Member States, as reaffirmed in Declaration (No 18) in relation to the delimitation of competences. The Czech Republic stresses that its provisions are addressed to the Member States only when they are implementing Union law, and not when they are adopting and implementing national law independently from Union law.

2. The Czech Republic also emphasises that the Charter does not extend the field of application of Union law and does not establish any new power for the Union. It does not diminish the field of application of national law and does not restrain any current powers of the national authorities in this field.

3. The Czech Republic stresses that, in so far as the Charter recognises fundamental rights and principles as they result from constitutional traditions common to the Member States, those rights and principles are to be interpreted in harmony with those traditions.

4. The Czech Republic further stresses that nothing in the Charter may be interpreted as restricting or adversely affecting human rights and fundamental freedoms as recognised, in their respective field of application, by Union law and by international agreements to which the Union or all the Member States are party, including the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, and by the Member States' Constitutions.

--------------------------------------------------
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 5562 

To modify United States-Israel anti-tunnel cooperation. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 17 (legislative day, DECEMBER 16), 2024 

Mr. PETERS (for himself and Mr. BUDD) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

A BILL 

To modify United States-Israel anti-tunnel cooperation. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MODIFICATION OF UNITED STATES-ISRAEL 

4 ANTI-TUNNEL COOPERATION. 

5 Subsection (a)(1) of section 1279 of the National De6 fense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (22 U.S.C. 

7 8606 note) is amended, in the first sentence, by striking 

8 ‘‘detect, map, and neutralize underground tunnels’’ and 

9 inserting ‘‘detect, map, maneuver in, and neutralize un10 derground tunnels’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
#### § 1201.21 May NARA's failure to comply with these regulations be used as a defense to a debt?

No, the failure of NARA to comply with any standard in the FCCS or these regulations will not be available to any debtor as a defense.
§ 1250.51 What fee policies apply to archival records? ( a ) NARA is specifically authorized to charge fees for copying archival records under a separate fee statute, 44 U.S.C. 2116(c). As a result, archival records are exempt from the FOIA fee waiver provisions, per 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(4)(A)(vi), and we do not grant fee waivers for archival records requested under the FOIA. However, we make most of our archival records available for examination at the NARA facility where the records are located. Whenever this is possible, you may review the records in a NARA research room at that facility free of charge and may also use your own equipment to make copies.
( b ) We do not charge search fees for FOIA requests for archival records, but we do limit the search to two hours.
( c ) If you would like us to make copies of archival records, we typically require you to pay all applicable fees (in accordance with the fee schedule) before we provide the copies.
( d ) You can find our Fee Schedule for archival records at: *www.archives.gov/research/order/fees.html .*
Total U.S. Exports to  Latvia

Data in Thousand Dollars 

Data For  JUN. 1999

|Group                  | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | Year to Date 6/1998 | Year to Date 6/1999 | % Change | Year Ending 6/1998 | Year Ending 6/1999 | % Change | % Share
|---------------------- | ---- | ---- | ---- | ---- | ------------------- | ------------------- | -------- | ------------------ | ------------------ | -------- | -------
|TEXTILES & APPAREL     | 1562 | 925  | 2164 | 3311 | 2209                | 2966                | 34.3     | 3511               | 4069               | 15.87    | 0.02   
|TOTAL APPAREL          | 355  | 207  | 137  | 238  | 214                 | 2267                | 957.1    | 315                | 2291               | 627.34   | 0.03   
|TEXTILE MILL PRODUCTS  | 1208 | 718  | 2027 | 3074 | 1994                | 699                 | -64.97   | 3196               | 1778               | -44.37   | 0.02   
|Fabric                 | 742  | 366  | 1573 | 2452 | 1610                | 611                 | -62.08   | 2596               | 1452               | -44.06   | 0.03   
|Made-Up Arts           | 456  | 352  | 454  | 622  | 384                 | 88                  | -77.07   | 601                | 326                | -45.75   | 0.02   
|Hosiery                | 197  |      | 0    | 0    | 0                   | 2250                |          | 0                  | 2250               |          | 0.49   
|MMF Broadwoven Fabs    | 437  | 270  | 960  | 1992 | 1380                | 476                 | -65.49   | 2043               | 1089               | -46.71   | 0.09   
|Speclty & Indstrl Fabs | 19   | 59   | 23   | 104  | 0                   | 54                  |          | 3                  | 158                | 5318.03  | 0.01   
|Floor Coverings        | 414  | 341  | 399  | 569  | 335                 | 84                  | -74.82   | 520                | 318                | -38.84   | 0.04
# EUR-Lex - 12005SP011 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12005SP011

**Protocol concerning the conditions and arrangements for admission of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania to the European Union - PART TWO:ADJUSTMENTS TO THE CONSTITUTION - TITLE I:INSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS - Article 11 **

*
Official Journal L 157 , 21/06/2005 P. 0032 - 0033 *

Article 11

Protocol No 5 on the Statute of the European Investment Bank, annexed to the Constitution, is hereby amended as follows:

1. In Article 4(1), first subparagraph:

(a) the introductory sentence shall be replaced by the following:

"1. The capital of the Bank shall be 164795737000 euro subscribed by the Member States as follows [***]:

(b) the following shall be inserted between the entries for Ireland and Slovakia:

"Romania 846000000"; and

(c) the following shall be inserted between the entries for Slovenia and Lithuania:

"Bulgaria 296000000".

2. In Article 9(2) the first, second and third paragraphs shall be replaced by the following:

"2. The Board of Directors shall consist of twenty-eight directors and eighteen alternate directors.

The directors shall be appointed by the Board of Governors for five years, one nominated by each Member State. One shall also be nominated by the Commission.

The alternate directors shall be appointed by the Board of Governors for five years as shown below:

- two alternates nominated by the Federal Republic of Germany,

- two alternates nominated by the French Republic,

- two alternates nominated by the Italian Republic,

- two alternates nominated by the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland,

- one alternate nominated by common accord between the Kingdom of Spain and the Portuguese Republic,

- one alternate nominated by common accord between the Kingdom of Belgium, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg and the Kingdom of the Netherlands,

- two alternates nominated by common accord between the Kingdom of Denmark, the Hellenic Republic, Ireland and Romania,

- two alternates nominated by common accord between the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Austria, the Republic of Finland and the Kingdom of Sweden,

- three alternates nominated by common accord between the Republic of Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia and the Slovak Republic,

- one alternate nominated by the Commission.".

[***] The figures quoted for Bulgaria and Romania are indicative and based on the 2003 data published by Eurostat."

--------------------------------------------------