alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           3,816
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   43,996
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                52,162
<PP&E>                                         961,368
<DEPRECIATION>                                 237,532
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 788,455
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           54,893
<BONDS>                                        539,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     28,468
<COMMON>                                           463
<OTHER-SE>                                     141,312
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   788,455
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               200,672
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  134,794
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              26,677
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 39,201
<INCOME-TAX>                                    13,517
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             25,684
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    23,905
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.60
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.59


</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 648
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 648 appear at 62 FR 14651, Mar. 27, 1997.

§ 648.164 Bluefish possession restrictions. ( a ) *Recreational possession limits.* Any person fishing from a vessel in the EEZ that is not fishing under a bluefish commercial permit shall observe the applicable recreational possession limit. The owner, operator, and crew of a charter or party boat issued a bluefish commercial permit are not subject to the recreational possession limit when not carrying passengers for hire and when the crew size does not exceed five for a party boat and three for a charter boat. ( 1 ) *Private recreational vessels.* Any person fishing from a vessel that is not fishing under a bluefish commercial or charter/party vessel permit issued pursuant to § 648.4(a)(8), may land up to three bluefish per day.
( 2 ) *For-hire vessels.* Anglers fishing onboard a for-hire vessel under a bluefish charter/party vessel permit issued pursuant to § 648.4(a)(8), may land up to five bluefish per person per day.
( b ) *Pooling Catch.* Bluefish harvested by vessels subject to the possession limit with more than one person on board may be pooled in one or more containers. Compliance with the daily possession limit will be determined by dividing the number of bluefish on board by the number of persons on board, other than the captain and the crew. If there is a violation of the possession limit on board a vessel carrying more than one person, the violation shall be deemed to have been committed by the owner and operator of the vessel.
[76 FR 60641, Sept. 29, 2011, as amended at 85 FR 38798, June 29, 2020]
OSWER/OSRTI

Washington, DC 20460

NATIONAL PRIORITIES LIST (NPL) 

***Final Site*** March 2015 

KOKOMO CONTAMINATED Kokomo, Indiana

GROUND WATER PLUME Howard County

 Site Location:

The Kokomo Contaminated Ground Water Plume site is a contaminated ground water plume with no identified source 

located in the city of Kokomo, Howard County, Indiana. The ground water plume is approximately 294 acres and 

encompasses several municipal wells in the city. 

 Site History:

Site investigations in 2007 confirmed levels of vinyl chloride at levels exceeding the EPA maximum contaminant 

level (MCL) in raw water at four (4) municipal wells. The Indiana Department of Environmental Management (IDEM) has 

identified fourteen handlers of chlorinated solventsin the area that could be contributing to the contaminated ground water

plume. Despite several investigations in the area, the exact origin of the contaminants is unknown. 

 Site Contamination/Contaminants:

The plume consists of chlorinated solvents, specifically, vinyl chloride. 

 Potential Impacts on Surrounding Community/Environment: 

Area residents are supplied by municipal water supply distribution systems and use municipal water as their drinking water

source. The affected wellfield provides water to approximately 55,000 residents in Kokomo. There are known 

contaminated residential wells which are believed to be used for non-potable purposes. 

 Response Activities (to date):

IDEM has identified fourteen facilities that handle chlorinated solvents and could be sources to the contamination plume.

Some of these potential sources are currently being managed under other authorities but there is no cleanup approach

focusing on the ground water plume. Water from several well fields in Kokomo are blended and treated prior to

distribution. A water treatment system has been successfully removing the vinyl chloride from the finished drinking water, 

but this is not a permanent solution to address the contaminated ground water plume. 

 Need for NPL Listing:

The state of Indiana referred the site to the EPA because the site requires a long term response action. Listing on the NPL 

will allow for a comprehensive investigation of the nature and extent of contamination. Other federal and state cleanup 

programs were evaluated but are not viable at this time. The city’s mayor has expressed support for listing, and the 

EPA received a letter of support from the state. 

[The description of the site (release) is based on information available at the time the site was evaluated with the HRS. The description may change 

as additional information is gathered on the sources and extent of contamination. See 56 FR 5600, February 11, 1991, or subsequent FR notices.]

For more information about the hazardous substances identified in this narrative summary, including general information regarding the effects of exposure to these 

substances on human health, please see the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) ToxFAQs. ATSDR ToxFAQs can be found on the Internet 

at http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxfaqs/index.asp or by telephone at 1-888-42-ATSDR or 1-888-422-8737.
# EUR-Lex - 12004V222 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V222

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART III — THE POLICIES AND FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - TITLE III — INTERNAL POLICIES AND ACTION - CHAPTER III — POLICIES IN OTHER AREAS - Section 3 — Economic, social and territorial cohesion - Article III-222 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0099 - 0099 *

Article III-222

The European Regional Development Fund is intended to help to redress the main regional imbalances in the Union through participation in the development and structural adjustment of regions whose development is lagging behind and in the conversion of declining industrial regions.

--------------------------------------------------
56492 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 187 / Wednesday, September 27, 2006 / Notices 

[FR Doc. 06–8317 Filed 9–26–06; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–C 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Office of the Secretary 

[Transmittal No. 06–55] 

36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification 

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense 

Security Cooperation Agency. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is 

publishing the unclassified text of a 

section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. 

This is published to fulfill the 

requirements of section 155 of Public 

Law 104–164 dated 21 July 1996. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

J. Hurd, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 604–

6575. 

The following is a copy of a letter to 

the Speaker of the House of 

Representatives, Transmittal 06–55 with 

attached transmittal, policy justification, 

and Sensitivity of Technology. 

Dated: September 22, 2006. 

C.R. Choate, 

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison 

Officer, Department of Defense. 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–M 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICESEN27SE06.093</GPH>
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 187 / Wednesday, September 27, 2006 / Notices 56493 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICESEN27SE06.104</GPH>
56494 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 187 / Wednesday, September 27, 2006 / Notices 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICESEN27SE06.105</GPH> EN27SE06.106</GPH>
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 187 / Wednesday, September 27, 2006 / Notices 56495 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICESEN27SE06.107</GPH>
56496 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 187 / Wednesday, September 27, 2006 / Notices 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICESEN27SE06.108</GPH>
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 187 / Wednesday, September 27, 2006 / Notices 56497 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICESEN27SE06.109</GPH> EN27SE06.110</GPH>
56498 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 187 / Wednesday, September 27, 2006 / Notices 

[FR Doc. 06–8318 Filed 9–26–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–C 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Office of the Secretary 

[Transmittal No. 06–68] 

36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification 

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense 

Security Cooperation Agency. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is 

publishing the unclassified text of a 

section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. 

This is published to fulfill the 

requirements of section 155 of Public 

Law 104–164 dated 21 July 1996. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

J. Hurd, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 604–

6575. 

The following is a copy of a letter to 

the Speaker of the House of 

Representatives, Transmittal 06–68 with 

attached transmittal and policy 

justification. 

Dated: September 22, 2006. 

C.R. Choate, 

Alternate OSD Register Register Liaison 

Officer, Department of Defense. 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–M 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION
OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Searchlight Minerals Corp.
(the “Company”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Ian R.
McNeil, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Melvin L. Williams, as
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of his knowledge:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




SEARCHLIGHT
      MINERALS CORP.Date:
      August 7, 2009
              By:
              /s/ IAN R. MCNEILIan
      R. McNeilChief
      Executive OfficerDate:  August
      7, 2009
              By:
              /s/ MELVIN L. WILLIAMSMelvin
      L. WilliamsChief
      Financial Officer
# EUR-Lex - 12008E/PRO/14 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008E/PRO/14

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - PROTOCOLS - Protocol (No 14) on the Euro Group **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0283 - 0283 *

PROTOCOL (No 14)

ON THE EURO GROUP

THE HIGH CONTRACTING PARTIES,

DESIRING to promote conditions for stronger economic growth in the European Union and, to that end, to develop ever-closer coordination of economic policies within the euro area,

CONSCIOUS of the need to lay down special provisions for enhanced dialogue between the Member States whose currency is the euro, pending the euro becoming the currency of all Member States of the Union,

HAVE AGREED UPON the following provisions, which shall be annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union:

Article 1

The Ministers of the Member States whose currency is the euro shall meet informally. Such meetings shall take place, when necessary, to discuss questions related to the specific responsibilities they share with regard to the single currency. The Commission shall take part in the meetings. The European Central Bank shall be invited to take part in such meetings, which shall be prepared by the representatives of the Ministers with responsibility for finance of the Member States whose currency is the euro and of the Commission.

Article 2

The Ministers of the Member States whose currency is the euro shall elect a president for two and a half years, by a majority of those Member States.

--------------------------------------------------
# EUR-Lex - 12008E301 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008E301

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - PART SIX: INSTITUTIONAL AND FINANCIAL PROVISIONS - TITLE I: INSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS - Chapter 3: The Union's advisory bodies - Section 1: The Economic and Social Committee - Article 301 (ex Article 258 TEC) **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0177 - 0177 *

Article 301

(ex Article 258 TEC)

The number of members of the Economic and Social Committee shall not exceed 350.

The Council, acting unanimously on a proposal from the Commission, shall adopt a decision determining the Committee's composition.

The Council shall determine the allowances of members of the Committee.

--------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20463

BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

In the Matter of ) 

 ) MUR 7742 

Twitter, Inc. ) 

) 

STATEMENT OF REASONS OF 

COMMISSIONER SEAN J. COOKSEY

For substantially the same reasons articulated in my Statement of Reasons in MURs 7821, 

7827, and 7868 (Twitter, Inc.), I voted to find no reason to believe Twitter violated campaignfinance law in this matter, but did not support the Commission’s Factual & Legal Analysis.

1 I 

believe Twitter is a media entity, and therefore its decisions about the content and operation of its 

platform—regardless of political motivation—fall within the Commission’s media exemption. I 

would resolve the matter on that basis alone.

______________________________ September 14, 2021 

Sean J. Cooksey Date

Commissioner

1

 Statement of Reasons of Commissioner Sean J. Cooksey (Sept. 13, 2021), MURs 7821, 7827 & 7868 

(Twitter, Inc., et al.).

MUR774200077
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 194 (Friday, October 6, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 59071]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-8581]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

AGENCY: U.S. Commission on Civil Rights.

Date and Time: Friday, October 13, 2006, 9 a.m.

Place: U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, 624 9th Street, NW., Room 540, 
Washington, DC 20425.
    The meeting is also accessible to the public through the following: 
Call-In Number: 1-800-597-0731; Access Code Number: 43783773; Federal 
Relay Service: 1-800-877-8339.

Status: 

Agenda

I. Approval of Agenda.
II. Approval of Minutes of August 18, Meeting.
III. Announcements.
IV. Staff Director's Report.
V. Program Planning.
    <bullet> Record for Briefing on Benefits of Diversity in K-12 
Education.
    <bullet> Briefing Report on K-12 Education.
    <bullet> Record for Omaha Briefing on Racially Identifiable School 
Districts.
    <bullet> Campus Anti-Semitism Public Education Campaign.
    <bullet> Research on Academic Mismatch.
VI. Management and Operations.
    <bullet> Procedures for National Office Work Products.
VII. State Advisory Committee Issues.
    <bullet> Re-Charter Package for Georgia State Advisory Committee.
    <bullet> Re-Charter Package for Illinois State Advisory Committee.
    <bullet> Re-Charter Package for Utah State Advisory Committee.
VIII. Future Agenda Items.
IX. Adjourn.

Briefing Agenda

Commission Briefing: Voter Fraud and Voter Intimidation.
    <bullet> Introductory Remarks by Chairman.
    <bullet> Speakers' Presentations.
    <bullet> Questions by Commissioners and Staff Director.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Manuel Alba, Press and Communications 
(202) 376-7700.

David Blackwood,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 06-8581 Filed 10-4-06; 3:56 pm]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
MUR808200082
I NTERNATIONAL S QUARE

1825 E YE S TREET , NW, S UITE 900

WASHINGTON , DC 20006-5468

TELEPHONE : 202-457-0160

F ACSIMILE : 844-670-6009

http://www.dickinsonwright.com

J ESSICA BROUCKAERT B ARTLETT

JBartlett@dickinsonwright.com

202 -659-6932

BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

STATEMENT OF DESIGNATION OF COUNSEL

MUR # 8082

Name of Counsel: Jessica B. Bartlett

Dickinson Wright PLLC

1825 Eye Street NW, Suite 900 

Washington, DC 20006

Telephone: (202) 659-6932

Fax: (844) 670-6009

The above-named individual and/or firm is hereby designated as my counsel and is authorized to 

receive any notifications and other communications from the Commission and to act on my behalf 

before the Commission.

____________ ________________________________ ______________

Date Respondent/Client Signature Title

Respondent/Client: Charles Gantt

Conservative Action Fund

138 Conant St., 2nd Floor

Beverly MA, 01915

Telephone - Business: (617) 231-4328

Information is being sought as part of an investigation being conducted by the Federal Election Commission and the 

confidentiality provisions of 52 U.S.C. 30109(a)(12)(A) apply. This section prohibits making public any investigation 

conducted by the Federal Election Commission without the express written consent of the person under investigation.

 7UHDVXUHU

MUR808200083
bgcp-ex104_47.htm



EXHIBIT 10.4

 



110 East 59th Street

New York, New York 10022

June 16, 2020

BGC Financial, L.P.

110 East 59th Street

New York, New York 10022

Attention:  Steve Bisgay


	
 
	
Re:
	
Amendment to Clearing Services Agreement




Dear Mr. Bisgay:

Reference is made to that certain Clearing Services Agreement (the “Agreement”), dated May 9, 2006, by and between Cantor Fitzgerald & Co. (“CF&Co.”) and BGC Financial, Inc. (n/k/a BGC Financial, L.P.) (“BGC”), which has been amended from time to time (the “Prior Amendments”).  Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined have the meanings set forth in the Agreement.  This amendment (this “Amendment”) is pursuant to Section XI.B of the Agreement.  To the extent there is a conflict between this Amendment and the Agreement or this Amendment and the Prior Amendments, in all cases, this Amendment shall control. 

1.CF&Co. and BGC hereby agree to amend the Agreement and the Prior Amendments as follows:

To the extent (i) CF&Co. is required by any central clearing counterparty (e.g., FICC, NSCC, etc.) to post collateral/margin in support of, or otherwise related to, any transactions cleared by CF&Co. on behalf of BGC, and (ii) such collateral/margin is not satisfied by a BGC security deposit, then CF&Co will charge BGC the then in effect intercompany borrowing rate for the capital used by CF&Co. on behalf of BGC.   For example, if CF&Co. is required to post $10 million of collateral for BGC as described in (i) above, BGC has previously posted a $5 million security deposit, and the intercompany borrowing interest rate between BGC and Cantor is 5.00% and is calculated on the actual number of days divided by 360, then CF&Co would charge BGC $394 per day ($10,000,000 - $5,000,000 = $5,000,000 * 5.00%/360).

2.General.  Except as expressly amended hereby, the terms of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

 

[Remainder of this page intentionally left blank]


 

 



 

Sincerely,

 

CANTOR FITZGERALD & CO.

 

 

 

By:/s/ John Yalmokas_________________

Name: John Yalmokas

Title: Authorized Signatory

 

 

 

BGC FINANCIAL, L.P.

 

 

 

By:/s/ Steve Bisgay__________

Name: Steve Bisgay

Title: Chief Financial Officer

 

 

 

 

[Signature page to amendment, dated June 16, 2020, to Clearing Services Agreement, dated May 9, 2006, between Cantor Fitzgerald & Co. and BGC Financial, Inc., relating to cost of services.]

 

2
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT JOHN WAYNE WARDEN, Jr., Plaintiff - Appe lla nt, v. NAYELIE B A RR IGAN, C R N, C e rtifie d R e g iste re d Nurse at ADOC Yum a , C oc opa h M e dic a l Unit; e t a l., De fe nda

nts - Appe lle e s. No. 13-15989 D.C . No. 2:11-c v-01461-DGC M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Distric t of Ariz o na Dav id G. C am

pbe ll, Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d July 22, 2014 ** B e fore : GOODW IN, C ANB Y, a nd C ALLAHAN, C irc uit Judge s . Form e r Ariz ona

sta te prisone r John W

ayn e W arde n, Jr ., a

ppe a ls pro se from the d istric t c o urt’ s sum

m ary judgm e nt in his 42 U.S.C . § 1983 a c tion a lle ging de libe ra t e indif

fe re nc e to his se rious m e dic a l ne e ds. W e have jurisdic t ion unde r 28 

# FIL ED JUL 31 2014 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S . CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).U.S.C . § 1291. W e re vie w de novo. Szaje r v . C ity of Los Ange le

s , 632 F . 3d 607, 610 (9th C i r . 201 1). W

e a f firm . The distric t c ourt prope rly grante d sum

m a ry judgm e nt be c a

use W a rde n fa ile d to ra ise a

ge nuine disputeof m ate ria l fa c t a s to whe the r de fe nda nts we re de libe ra t e ly

indif fe re nt by de ny ing or de la

y ing post-operative tre atm e nt for his le ft e y e , or by inte rfe ring with his a

bility to re c e ive post-ope rative tre atm e nt. Se e T oguc hi v . C hung , 391 F .3d 1051, 1057-58 (9th C ir . 2004) (prison of fic ia ls a c t with de libe rate indif

fe re nc e only

if the y know of a

n d disre ga rd an e xc e ssive risk to inm ate he a l th; a

prisone r’ s dif

fe re nc e of opinion c o nc e rning thec ourse of tre atm e n t doe s not a

m ount to de libe rate indif

fe re nc e ); Halle tt v

. Mor gan , 296 F .3d 732, 745-46 (9th C ir . 2002) (de la y of m e dic a l tre atm e nt doe s not c onstitute de libe ra t e indif

fe re nc e unle s s de la

y le d to furthe r injury ). W e re je c t W a rde n’ s c onte ntion tha

t the distric t c ourt a

b use d its disc re tion in c onside ring de fe nda

nts’ e vide nc e . AFFIRM E D .

1 3 - 1 5 9 8 9 2
Case 16-29883 Doc 11 Filed 09/22/16 Entered 09/23/16 09:00:07 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1