alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Dr. David J. Rooke, certify that:

1. 	I have reviewed this interim report on Form 10-QSB of Regma Bio Technologies Limited;

2. 	Based on my knowledge, this interim report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; and

3.  	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this interim report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this interim report.

4. 	The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15) for the registrant and we have:

a) 	designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) 	evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) 	presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. 	The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) 	all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) 	any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. 	The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Dated this 13th day of November, 2003.



| | /s/ David J. Rooke, 
Dr. David J. Rooke 
President, Principal Executive Officer
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<PAGE>

                                                                EXHIBIT 10.12(c)


               AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT DATED DECEMBER 1, 1995
                                    BY AND BETWEEN
                              RURAL CELLULAR CORPORATION
                                         AND
                                   SCOTT G. DONLEA


     THIS AMENDMENT entered into this 18th day of December, 1997, by and between
Rural Cellular Corporation ("RCC" or "Company") and Scott G. Donlea (the
"Employee").

     WHEREAS, RCC and the Employee entered into a written Employment Agreement
on December 1, 1995 (the "Employment Agreement");

     WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 14 of the Employment Agreement, RCC and the
Employee desire to amend the Employee's Employment Agreement to extend the term
of the Agreement and to increase certain payments to Employee in the event of a
change in control of RCC;

     NOW, THEREFORE, it is AGREED as follows:

     5.   The Employee's term of employment as set forth in Section 5 of the
Employment Agreement is hereby extended to December 31, 2000.

     6.   The amount to be paid to the Employee in the event of the involuntary
termination of his employment, absent Just Cause, in connection with, or within
twelve (12) months after, any change in control of RCC, as stated in Section
11(a) of the Employment Agreement, shall be equal to the product of 2.99 times
the Employee's "base amount" as defined in Section 280G(b)(3) of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code") and the rgulations promulgated
thereunder.

     7.   Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings
ascribed to such terms in the Employment Agreement.

     8.   All other terms, conditions and provisions of the Employment Agreement
remain in full force and effect.


                                   RURAL CELLULAR CORPORATION


                                   By: /s/   Richard P. Ekstrand
                                      --------------------------
                                      Richard P. Ekstrand
                                      President and Chief Executive Officer


                                   ----------------------------------------
     Scott G. Donlea
§ 1192.71 General. ( a ) New, used and remanufactured light rail vehicles, to be considered accessible by regulations issued by the Department of Transportation in 49 CFR part 37, shall comply with this subpart.
( b ) ( 1 ) Vehicles intended to be operated solely in light rail systems confined entirely to a dedicated right-of-way, and for which all stations or stops are designed and constructed for revenue service after the effective date of standards for design and construction issued pursuant to subpart C of 49 CFR part 37, shall provide level boarding and shall comply with §§ 1192.73(d)(1) and 1192.85.
( 2 ) Vehicles designed for, and operated on, pedestrian malls, city streets, or other areas where level boarding is not practicable shall provide wayside or car-borne lifts, mini-high platforms, or other means of access in compliance with § 1192.83 (b) or (c).
( c ) If portions of the vehicle are modified in a way that affects or could affect accessibility, each such portion shall comply, to the extent practicable, with the applicable provisions of this subpart. This provision does not require that inaccessible vehicles be retrofitted with lifts, ramps or other boarding devices.
( d ) Existing vehicles retrofitted to comply with the “one-car-per-train rule” at 49 CFR 37.93 shall comply with §§ 1192.75, 1192.77(c), 1192.79(a) and 1192.83(a) and shall have, in new and key stations, at least one door which complies with § 1192.73 (a)(1), (b) and (d). Vehicles previously designed and manufactured in accordance with the accessibility requirements of 49 CFR part 609 or Department of Transportation regulations implementing section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 that were in effect before October 7, 1991, and which can be entered and used from stations in which they are to be operated, may be used to satisfy the requirements of 49 CFR 37.93.
FAX NO. 651 227 3801 P. 02 ~~08-2010 MON 11:57 AM Minnesota AFL-CIO 

MEMBERS 

CWALoMI7100 

(Mph'" 8t1bllrbs) 

CWA f..oeal720l 

(Si. Paul & S.Imrbs) 

CWA l..oeItl '12ft3 

(trOll R.II~(! CIIfeII) 

(."WALll£1I172Ol 

(Roell.lllter Are., 

Fairbault,OwRtollole, 

AUilIiIl, Albert 14111_ 

Soutbwesttrn MN) 

CWA LlleI!I 7D5 

(WUlomr ArM) 

CWA toea) neli 

(WiDOlUl ARK) 

CWAlMal'7l11 

(St. Ooud. Sauk: Centre. 

Litoe Fa., Brainerd) 

CWA LotI.) '1214 

(Duluth, Bemidji, 

Nortlleute.... !\tN. & 

Pillt Ciiy Area) 

(''WA LliQt 7219 

(Wlldlna, FUUQ5 Falls, 

DetroJ, L~ PArk RlIpids) 

(,'W'ALoealn50 

(MN.IA. HE, Nil. SO) 

CWA LocAl n'10 

(lIurIlSVIDc:, AppleV.Dey, 

& parh Clf Soother .. MN) 

CWA l.oeal '1)72 

(EnMlle & NW MN, 

TbleC Binr Falla, fWIoIIU. 

Warroad" Crookston 

CWA-TNC l.oeai3700l 

(Millanotll) 

CWA-NADE'f LeM15'14U 

(MiDlieaplllill & St. ""uI) 

fUF..cwA l.PAI 1140 

(Mlbllt::llpoJiS) 

COBlmunications Workers of America 


Minnesota State Council. 


.-..~-..--.. -~-..-.====.---. 

~'!".~!..-II S 10-':308-031 

CONTROL NO 

March 8,2010 

The Honor,qble Roy LaHood 

United Sates Department of TransPortation 

1200 New ,Jersey Avenue. SE 

Wallhington, p.e.10590 

RE; 08T.2010-0018 US Tokyo (H.. neda) Combination Services Allocation proceed~~~ 

As the president of the Communicatiool! WorkeOl of America Minnesftta State Council. 1 am writing in 

support of the Delta Airlines applif;ation to provide new nOHtop service to Tokyo's Jlaneda airport 

from points inside oftbe United States. Wc hope yem will eonslder this applieation and award approval 

of.Delta'lI application. 

Thc Dight attendants from Northwest that now work for Delta arc members 01 the Association 01 Flight. 

AttendaQtH-CommunicAtlons Workers of Ameriea(AFA-CWA). Tile CWA Minnesota State Council 

looks at this as job application for our members. The Right attendants worldng tltese nights to Tokyo's 

Haneda airport will be U.S night attendants. Tbis ill very important at this tiDle to obtain and keep 8S 

many jobs for US workers as P09s''''e. Wti hope you win strongly consider this In your decisloQ makin" 

proooss. 

Approval or Delta'& application maltes good j)usiness sense for thl.l health or this airline and the people 

who work for it. We see this as a big win for Delta and our members who work there wheQ you 

approve this application. 

3521 East Lake Street. Minneapolis, Minnesota 55406 

(llALL 612.722.7200 FAX 612.722.1274) 

ope.... #12/08
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-1296

SECRETARY OF CONGRESS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

STATE OF MARYLAND,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, Chief District Judge.

(CA-02-698-MJG)

Submitted: May 16, 2002 Decided: May 22, 2002

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Secretary of Congress, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

The Appellant, who refers to himself as the Secretary of

Congress of the United States, appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his civil action against the State of Maryland as

legally frivolous. We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Secretary of

Congress v. Maryland, No. CA-02-698-MJG (D. Md. Mar. 5, 2002). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Argued and submitted September 24, 1993,

affirmed January 26, 1994

#### In the Matter of the Compensation of Jeanne S. Wall, Claimant. Jeanne S. WALL, *Petitioner, v.*RAISING PRESCHOOL, INC., and SAIF Corporation, *Respondents.*

(91-01585; CA A76502)

866 P2d 525

Karen M. Werner argued the cause for petitioner. With her on the brief was Emmons, Kropp, Kryger, Alexander, Egan & Allen.

Steve Cotton, Special Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.

Before Rossman, Presiding Judge, and De Muniz and Leeson, Judges.

PER CURIAM

*171PER CURIAM

Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board holding that it does not have jurisdiction to review an order of the Director under ORS 656.245(1)(b) concerning the appropriateness of palliative care. We have disposed of most of the issues that claimant raises in *Hathaway v. Health Future Enterprises,*125 Or App 549, 865 P2d 503 (1993). Claimant contends that the Board’s ruling that claimant has no right to a hearing on palliative care disputes violates the United States and Oregon constitutions. The issue is raised for the first time on review, and we will not address it.

Affirmed.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                        PURSUANT TO 18U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ace Marketing & Promotions, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Dean L.
Julia, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

                                                /S/ DEAN L. JULIA
                                                --------------------------------
                                                DEAN L. JULIA
                                                CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                                MAY 13, 2008
# EUR-Lex - 12005S/AFI/DCL/02 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12005S/AFI/DCL/02

**Final Act - II.Declarations - A.Joint Declarations by the present Member States - 2.Joint Declaration on grain legumes: Bulgaria **

*
Official Journal L 157 , 21/06/2005 P. 0391 - 0391 *

2. Joint declaration on grain legumes: Bulgaria

With regard to grain legumes an area of 18047 ha has been taken into account for the calculation of Bulgaria's national ceiling in Annex VIIIA to Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 of 29 September 2003 (OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 1).

--------------------------------------------------
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 60102 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v. CONNIE LARABEL , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi USDC No. 3:06

- CR

- 71

- 1

Before KING, DENNIS, and COSTA, Circuit Judges

. PER CURIAM: * Connie Larabel, after three prior revocations, admitted to again violating terms of her supervised release by testing positive for drug use and failing to make restitution payments ; the district court sentenced her to the statutory maximum of 24 months of imprisonment despite that her guidelines range was only three to nine months . She argues that the district court committed

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED September 15, 2016 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 16-60102 Document: 00513680223 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/15/2016No. 16

- 60102

2 procedural error and imposed a substantively unreasonable revocation sentence. We review a revocation sentence under the plainly u nreasonable standard in a two

- step process, examining first for procedural error and then for substantive reasonableness. United States v. Winding , 817 F.3d 910, 913 (5th Cir. 2016). However, because Larabel failed to raise it below , we review only for p lain error her claim that the district court procedurally erred by offering an inadequate explanation for the sentence imposed

. See United States v. Warren , 720 F.3d 321, 326

- 27 (5th Cir. 2013) ; United States v. Mondragon

- Santiago , 564 F.3d 357, 361 (5th Cir. 2009) . Since Larabel does not even attempt to show that the district court committed plain error, her claim fails. See id. We review the substantive reasonableness of Larabel’s sentence for an abuse of discretion. See Winding , 817 F.3d at 9 13. A revocation sentence that exceeds the applicable guidelines range is substantively unreasonable if it “ (1) does not account for a factor that should have received significant weight, (2) gives significant weight to an irrelevant or improper factor, or (3) r epresents a clear error of judgment in balancing the sentencing factors .” Warren , 720 F.3d at 332 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). The record demonstrates that the district court made an individualized sentencing decision based upon the applicable sentencing factors , and while Larabel invites us to reweigh those factors, we may not do so

. See Gall v. United States , 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007); Winding , 817 F.3d at 914

. Larabel fails to show that the district court abused its discretio n. See Winding , 817 F.3d at 9 13. AFFIRMED. Case: 16-60102 Document: 00513680223 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/15/2016
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 91 (Wednesday, May 11, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 27374]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-11547]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 7452]

Determination Pursuant to Section 451 of the Foreign Assistance 
Act Relating to Assistance for Individuals To Support Near East 
Regional Democracy

    Pursuant to section 451 of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, as 
amended (the ``Act'') (22 U.S.C. section 2261) and section 1-100 of 
Executive Order 12163, as amended, I hereby authorize, notwithstanding 
any other provision of law, the use of $5,000,000 in FY 2010 Economic 
Support Funds in order to provide assistance for individuals in support 
of Near East Regional Democracy.
    This Determination shall be reported to the Congress promptly and 
published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: April 19, 2011.
Hillary Rodham Clinton,
Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2011-11547 Filed 5-10-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-31-P
```
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

 WASHINGTON, D.C.

 

 March 5, 2024 

VIA EMAIL

janicewinfreyforcongress@gmail.com

Brigette M. Dawson, Treasurer

Janice Winfrey for Congress

Detroit, MI 48219

 RE: MUR 8045 

 Winfrey for Congress

Dear Ms. Dawson:

 

On August 4, 2022, the Federal Election Commission notified Winfrey for Congress and 

you, as treasurer (the “Committee”), of a complaint alleging violations of certain sections of the 

Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended (the “Act”). A copy of the complaint was 

forwarded to you and the candidate at that time. 

 Upon further review of the allegations contained in the complaint, and information 

supplied by the Committee, the Commission, on February 28, 2024, voted to dismiss this matter. 

Documents related to the case will be placed on the public record within 30 days. 

See Disclosure of Certain Documents in Enforcement and Other Matters, 81 Fed. Reg. 50,702 

(Aug. 2, 2016). 

 If you have any questions, please contact Matt Lupo, the attorney assigned to this matter, 

at (202) 694-1688 or mlupo@fec.gov. 

 Sincerely, 

 

 Wanda D. Brown 

 Assistant General Counsel 

cc: Candidate 

MUR804500017
##### 



PAGARÉ BANCOLOMBIA (PANAMÁ) S.A. EN
 DÓLARES
 Pagaré No.
(En adelante el Pagaré)
 Por: USD$50,000,000.oo
 A la tasa Libor a 180 dias vigente el 26 de agosto de
 2005 adicionada en 1.5%
 Vencimiento Final: Agosto 26 de 2006
 BANCOLOMBIA (PANAMÁ) S.A. PROMISSORY
 NOTE IN US DOLLARS
 Promissory Note No. ___
(Hereinafter the Promissory Note)
 In the amount of USD$50,000,000.oo
 At a rate of Libor 180 days in force August 26, 2005
 plus a margin of 1.5%
 Expires: August 26, 2006
    TUBOS DEL CARIBE LTDA. TUBOCARIBE LTDA.
 TUBOS DEL CARIBE LTDA. TUBOCARIBE LTDA.
    BANCOLOMBIA (PANAMA)
S.A. CINCUENTA MILLONES CON 00/100 USD$50,000,000.00
 BANCOLOMBIA (PANAMA) S.A. FIFTY MILLION DOLLARS AND 00/100 of the United States of America (USD$50,000,000.00)




---



##### 



365 DÍAS UNA AL VENCIMIENTO CINCUENTA MILLONES CON 00/100 (USD$50,000,000.00)
 365 DAYS ONE END FIFTY MILLION DOLLARS AND 00/100 USD$50,000,000.00
    CUOTA No.
    
    FECHA DE VENCIMIENTO
    
    VALOR USD1
    
    Agosto 26 de 2006
    
    50,000,000.00TOTAL USD
    
    50,000,000.00
 INSTALLMENT No.
    
    EXPIRATION DATE
    
    AMOUNT USD1
    
    August 26, 2006
    
    50,000,000.00TOTAL USD
    
    50,000,000.00




---



##### 








---



##### 








---



##### 








---



##### 



The Debtor and its majority shareholder, Maverick Tube Corporation (hereinafter Maverick),
promise not to register or implement any transaction that may change Mavericks current
participation in the Debtors capital structure in such a way that it no longer remains as direct
or indirect shareholder of at least the eighty percent (80%) of the shares of the Debtor (the
Minimum Participation), without the previous written authorization of the Bank. The Debtor or
Maverick shall notify the Bank of any change in Mavericks ownership in the Debtors shares.In the event Mavericks participation in the Debtors capital structure diminishes below the
Minimum Participation, the Bank may declare expired the term for payment of the loan, and demand
the immediate payment of the outstanding amounts including principal, interest and other expenses
and charges related to the collection of the amounts.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
     PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(B) OR RULE 15D-14(B) AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of The Meridian Resource
Corporation (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Form 10-K"), I,
Joseph A. Reeves, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Date: March 15, 2006


                                        /s/ Joseph A. Reeves, Jr.
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Joseph A. Reeves, Jr.
                                        Chief Executive Officer