alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.1

                 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350
                       as adopted pursuant to Section 906
                        of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of AngelCiti Entertainment, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, George
Guttierez, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Dean Ward, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

                                     /s/ George Guttierez
Dated: May 20, 2003                  -----------------------------------------
                                     George Guttierez, Chief Executive Officer



                                     /s/ Dean Ward
Dated: May 20, 2003                  ------------------------------------------
                                     Dean Ward, Chief Financial Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-60102

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

CONNIE LARABEL,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 3:06-CR-71-1

Before KING, DENNIS, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Connie Larabel, after three prior revocations, admitted to again violating 

terms of her supervised release by testing positive for drug use and failing to 

make restitution payments; the district court sentenced her to the statutory 

maximum of 24 months of imprisonment despite that her guidelines range was 

only three to nine months. She argues that the district court committed 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

September 15, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-60102 Document: 00513680223 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/15/2016
No. 16-60102

2

procedural error and imposed a substantively unreasonable revocation 

sentence. 

We review a revocation sentence under the plainly unreasonable 

standard in a two-step process, examining first for procedural error and then 

for substantive reasonableness. United States v. Winding, 817 F.3d 910, 913 

(5th Cir. 2016). However, because Larabel failed to raise it below, we review 

only for plain error her claim that the district court procedurally erred by 

offering an inadequate explanation for the sentence imposed. See United 

States v. Warren, 720 F.3d 321, 326-27 (5th Cir. 2013); United States v. 

Mondragon-Santiago, 564 F.3d 357, 361 (5th Cir. 2009). Since Larabel does 

not even attempt to show that the district court committed plain error, her 

claim fails. See id.

We review the substantive reasonableness of Larabel’s sentence for an 

abuse of discretion. See Winding, 817 F.3d at 913. A revocation sentence that 

exceeds the applicable guidelines range is substantively unreasonable if it “(1) 

does not account for a factor that should have received significant weight, (2) 

gives significant weight to an irrelevant or improper factor, or (3) represents a 

clear error of judgment in balancing the sentencing factors.” Warren, 720 F.3d 

at 332 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). The record 

demonstrates that the district court made an individualized sentencing 

decision based upon the applicable sentencing factors, and while Larabel 

invites us to reweigh those factors, we may not do so. See Gall v. United States, 

552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007); Winding, 817 F.3d at 914. Larabel fails to show that 

the district court abused its discretion. See Winding, 817 F.3d at 913.

AFFIRMED.

 Case: 16-60102 Document: 00513680223 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/15/2016
EXHIBIT 23.2



[LETTERHEAD OF MILLER AND LENTS, LTD. APPEARS HERE]

February 26, 2008

XTO Energy Inc.

810 Houston Street

Fort Worth, TX 76102



| | Re: | XTO Energy Inc.
| | --- | ---------------

| |  | 2007 Annual Report on
| |  | ---------------------

| |  | Form 10-K
| |  | ---------

Gentlemen:

The firm of Miller and Lents, Ltd., consents to the references to our firm in the form and context in which they appear and to the use of our report
dated February 13, 2008, regarding the XTO Energy Inc. Proved Reserves and Future Net Revenues as of December 31, 2007, in the 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K. We further consent to the incorporation by reference of our report in
Registration Statements Nos. 333-135136, 333-122767 and 333-123402 on Form S-3, and Registration Statements Nos. 333-68775, 333-69977, 333-37668, 333-81849, 333-91460, 333-120540 and 33-55784 on Form S-8 of XTO Energy Inc.

Miller and Lents, Ltd., has no interests in XTO Energy Inc. or in any affiliated companies or subsidiaries and is not to receive any such interest as
payment for such reports and has no director, officer, or employee otherwise connected with XTO Energy Inc. We are not employed by XTO Energy Inc. on a contingent basis.



Yours very truly,  MILLER AND LENTS, LTD.By

/S/ JAMES PEARSONJames Pearson Chairman
1 

4 

FEDE 

WASHir 

?AL ELECTION COMMISSION 

IGTON, D.C. 20463. 

SEP 24 2014 

CT Corporation System 

4701 Cox Road, Suite 285 

Glen Alien, VA 23060 

Dear Sir or Madam: 

RE: MUR6872 

The Federal E ection Commission received a complaint that indicates New Models may 

have violated the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended ("the Act"). A copy of the 

complaint is enclosed We have numbered this matter MUR 6872. Please refer to this number in 

all fhture correspondence. 

Under the Act you have the opportunity to demonstrate in writing that no action should be 

taken against.New M( idels in this matter. Please submit any factual or legal materials that you 

believe are relevant to the Commission's analysis of this matter. Where appropriate, statements 

should be submitted imder oath. Your response, which should be addressed to the General 

Counsel's Office, musjt be submitted within 15 days of receipt of this lettCT. If no response is 

received within 15 days, the Commission may take further action based on the available 

information. ! 

This matter will remain confidential in accordance with 52 U.S.C. § 30109(a)(4)(B) and 

§ 30109(a)(12)(A) unless you notify the Commission in writing that you wish the matter to be 

made public. If you intend to be represented by counsel in this matter, please advise the 

Commission by completing the enclosed form stating the name, address and telqihone number of 

such counsel, and authorizing such counsel to receive any notifications and other communications 

fix>m the Commission Please note that you have a legal obligation to preserve all documents, 

records and materials relating to the subject matter of the complaint until such time as you are 

notified that the Conunission has closed its file in this matter. See 18 U.S.C. § 1519. 
Any correspondence sent to the Commission must be addressed as follows; 

Mail 

Federal Election Commission 

Office of Complaints Examination 

and Legrd Administration 

Email 

fhampton@fec.gov 

Attn: Franl 

999 E Street, NW 

Washington, DC 20436 

0 

If you have any qu 

at 1-800-424-9530. Fory 

Commission's procedures 

je Hampton, Paralegal 

estions, please contact Frankie Hampton at (202) 694-1650 or toll fiee 

3ur information, we have enclosed a brief description of the 

for handling complaints. 

Sincerely, 

5 

8 

4 

cc: 6165 Moristreet 

McLean, VA 22101 

5. Jor 

Assistant General Counsel 

Complaints Examination & 

Legal Administration
EXHIBIT 32-1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of WNC Housing Tax
Credit  Fund  VI,  L.P.  Series  7 (the  "Partnership")  for the  quarter  ended
December 31,  2004 as filed with the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"),  and pursuant to 18 U.S.C., section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Wilfred N. Cooper,
Jr.,  President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates,  Inc.,  general
partner of the Partnership, hereby certify that:

          1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,  except to the
               extent that such  provisions  require the filing of an opinion of
               registiered  public  accountants  to accompany the  Partnership's
               annual financial statements; and

          2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
               material  respects,   the  financial   condition  and  result  of
               operations of the Partnership.




/s/WILFRED N. COOPER, JR.
-------------------------
Wilfred N. Cooper, Jr.
President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.
Date:    January 10, 2006
# EUR-Lex - 12004V413 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V413

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART III — THE POLICIES AND FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - TITLE VI — THE FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - CHAPTER II — FINANCIAL PROVISIONS - Section 4 — Common provisions - Article III-413 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0179 - 0179 *

Article III-413

The European Parliament, the Council and the Commission shall ensure that the financial means are made available to allow the Union to fulfil its legal obligations in respect of third parties.

--------------------------------------------------
Order Issued October 18, 2012

In The 

## C!tnurt nf Appeals lf.ifth, 

## ilistrict nf Wems 

## at sallits No. 05-10-00467-CR KENNY WIGGINS, Appellant 

## v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 3 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F09-54476-J 

### ORDER On the Court's own motion, we WITHDRAW the mandate issued in this matter on April 30,2012. We DIRECT that a new mandate issue forthwith reflecting that thejudgmentofthe trial court is modified to delete the $7500 fine from the trial court'sjudgmentand affirmingthejudgment as modified.

ROBERT M. FILLMORE JUSTICE
#### § 501.3 Procedure for responding to requests regarding the existence of records pertaining to an individual.

Any individual may submit a request to be notified whether a system of records, with respect to which the Commission has published a notice in the Federal Register, contains a record pertaining to him or her. Requests may be made in writing to the Privacy Officer or by appearing in person at the Commission offices located at 1625 I Street, NW., Room 307, Washington, DC 20006 between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. on any working day. Systems of records that are the subject of a request should be identified by reference to the system name designated in the Notice of Systems of Records published in the Federal Register. In the event a system name is not known to the individual, a general request will suffice if it indicates reasons for the belief that a record pertaining to the named individual is maintained by the Commission. Receipt of inquiries submitted by mail will be acknowledged within 10 days of receipt (excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and legal public holidays) unless a response can also be prepared and forwarded to the individual within that time.
§ 37.13 Group participation. ( a ) To avoid unnecessary duplication of exploratory activities, the permittee shall, if ordered by the Regional Director, afford all interested persons, through a signed agreement, an opportunity to participate in its exploratory activities. Within 60 days following such order, the permittee shall provide evidence satisfactory to the Regional Director of its compliance therewith. The permittee shall provide the Regional Director with the names and addresses of all additional participants, as they join.
( b ) If, with the approval of the Regional Director, the permittee at any time changes any provisions of its approved exploration plan relating to areal extent, intensity of exploratory activities, or logistical support, and the Regional Director determines such changes to be significant, the Regional Director may require the permittee to afford all interested persons another opportunity to participate in the permitted exploratory activities in accordance with paragraph (a) of this section.
( c ) The requirements of this section do not preclude the permittee from initiating field operations as authorized under its special use permit.
( d ) All participants shall be bound by the regulations of this part, the permittee's special use permit, approved exploration plan and plan of operation and any reasonable stipulations, demands and orders issued by the Regional Director.
#### § 86.103 Can the Director authorize an exception to this part?

The Director can authorize an exception to any requirement of this part that is not explicitly required by law if it does not conflict with other laws or regulations or the policies of the Department of the Interior or the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
#### § 80.132 Does an agency have to control the land or water where it completes capital improvements?

Yes. A State fish and wildlife agency must control the parcel of land and water on which it completes a grant-funded capital improvement. An agency must exercise this control by holding title to a fee or leasehold interest or through another legally binding agreement. Control must be adequate for the protection, maintenance, and use of the improvement for its authorized purpose during its useful life even if the agency did not acquire the parcel with grant funds.
§ 697.9 Facilitation of enforcement. ( a ) *General.* See § 600.730 of this chapter.
( b ) *Radio hails.* Permit holders, while underway, must be alert for communication conveying enforcement instructions and immediately answer via VHF-FM radio, channel 16, when hailed by an enforcement officer. Vessels not required to have VHF-FM radios by the Coast Guard are exempt from this requirement.
[64 FR 68248, Dec. 6, 1999, as amended at 73 FR 67809, Nov. 17, 2008]
§ 600.1505 Messaging. ( a ) Unless otherwise specified, this section applies to all VMS units, MCSs, and bundles. Units that can operate as both an EMTU and EMTU-C must meet the requirements for both an EMTU and an EMTU-C in order to gain type-approval as both. Depending on the reporting requirements for the fishery(s) in which the requester is seeking type-approval, an EMTU-C type-approval may not require the inclusion of a dedicated message terminal and display component at the time of approval, but the capability to support such a component must be shown. To be type-approved in any given fishery, a VMS unit must meet messaging information requirements under the applicable VMS regulations and requirements in effect for each fishery or region for which the type-approval applies. The VMS unit must also meet the following requirements:
( b ) An EMTU must be able to run software and/or applications that send email messages for the purpose of complying with VMS reporting requirements in Federal fisheries that require email communication capability. An EMTU-C must be able to run or connect to a device that can run such software and/or applications. In such cases, the EMTU/EMTU-C messaging must provide for the following capabilities: ( 1 ) Messaging from vessel to shore, and from shore to vessel by authorized entities, must have a minimum supported message length of 1 KB. For EMTU-Cs, this messaging capability need only be functional when in range of shore-based cellular communications.
( 2 ) There must be a confirmation of delivery function that allows a user to ascertain whether a specific message was successfully transmitted to the MCS email server(s).
( 3 ) Notification of failed delivery to the EMTU/EMTU-C must be sent to the sender of the message. The failed delivery notification must include sufficient information to identify the specific message that failed and the cause of failure (*e.g.,* invalid address, EMTU/EMTU-C switched off, *etc.*).
( 4 ) The EMTU/EMTU-C must have an automatic retry feature in the event that a message fails to be delivered.
( 5 ) The EMTU/EMTU-C user interface must: ( i ) Support an “address book” capability and a function permitting a “reply” to a received message without re-entering the sender's address.
( ii ) Provide the ability to review by date order, or by recipient, messages that were previously sent. The EMTU/EMTU-C terminal must support a minimum message history of 50 sent messages—commonly referred to as an “Outbox” or “Sent” message display.
( iii ) Provide the ability to review by date order, or by sender, all messages received. The EMTU/EMTU-C terminal must support a minimum message history of at least 50 messages in an inbox.
#### § 1206.60 What must I provide as a formal grant application?

The forms and other documents you must submit are listed with each grant opportunity announcement on the NHPRC web site. OMB Control Number 3095-0013 has been assigned to this information collection.

[71 FR 27624, May 12, 2006, as amended at 75 FR 66319, Oct. 28, 2010]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          48,008
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,790
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,415)
<INVENTORY>                                      5,039
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                64,915
<PP&E>                                           7,290
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (4,573)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  71,294
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,691
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        63,780
<OTHER-SE>                                     (3,177)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    71,294
<SALES>                                         13,529
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                14,974
<CGS>                                            8,220
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,220
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,473
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (19)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,653
<INCOME-TAX>                                       675
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                978
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       978
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.07


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
condensed consolidated balance sheets and condensed consolidated statements
of operations found on pages 1 and 2 for the three months ended March 31,
2000 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001083753
<NAME> THERMOVIEW INDUSTRIES, INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       1,028,614
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,440,575
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  2,497,802
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,028,286
<PP&E>                                       3,767,633
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              90,132,518
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,201,438
<BONDS>                                     28,871,671
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        5,074,985
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,325
<OTHER-SE>                                  46,947,308
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                90,132,518
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            21,476,416
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               10,382,077
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,093,320
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,150,199)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (1,255,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,895,119)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,895,119)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.44)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.44)


</TABLE>
§ 665.627 Allowable gear and gear restrictions. ( a ) Coral reef ecosystem MUS may be taken only with the following allowable gear and methods: ( 1 ) Hand harvest;
( 2 ) Spear;
( 3 ) Slurp gun;
( 4 ) Hand net/dip net;
( 5 ) Hoop net for Kona crab;
( 6 ) Throw net;
( 7 ) Barrier net;
( 8 ) Surround/purse net that is attended at all times;
( 9 ) Hook-and-line (includes handline (powered or not), rod-and-reel, and trolling);
( 10 ) Crab and fish traps with vessel ID number affixed; and
( 11 ) Remote-operating vehicles/submersibles.
( b ) PRIA coral reef ecosystem MUS may not be taken by means of poisons, explosives, or intoxicating substances. Possession or use of these materials by any permit holder under this subpart who is established to be fishing for coral reef ecosystem MUS in the management area is prohibited.
( c ) PRIA coral reef ecosystem MUS may not be taken by means of spearfishing with SCUBA at night (from 6 p.m. to 6 a.m.) in the U.S. EEZ waters around Howland Island, Baker Island, Jarvis Island, Wake Island, Kingman Reef, Johnston Atoll and Palmyra Atoll.
( d ) Existing FEP fisheries shall follow the allowable gear and methods outlined in their respective plans.
( e ) Any person who intends to fish with new gear not included in this section must describe the new gear and its method of deployment in the special permit application. A decision on the permissibility of this gear type will be made by the Regional Administrator after consultation with the Council and the director of the affected state fishery management agency.