alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EUR-Lex - 12004V340 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V340

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART III — THE POLICIES AND FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - TITLE VI — THE FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - CHAPTER I — PROVISIONS GOVERNING THE INSTITUTIONS - Section 1 — The institutions - Subsection 1 — The European Parliament - Article III-340 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0153 - 0153 *

Article III-340

If a motion of censure on the activities of the Commission is tabled before it, the European Parliament shall not vote thereon until at least three days after the motion has been tabled and shall do so only by open vote.

If the motion of censure is carried by a two-thirds majority of the votes cast, representing a majority of the component members of the European Parliament, the members of the Commission shall resign as a body and the Union Minister for Foreign Affairs shall resign from duties that he or she carries out in the Commission. They shall remain in office and continue to deal with current business until they are replaced in accordance with Articles I-26 and I-27. In this case, the term of office of the members of the Commission appointed to replace them shall expire on the date on which the term of office of the members of the Commission obliged to resign as a body would have expired.

--------------------------------------------------
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The undersigned, Donald Sharpe, President, and Drew Bonnell, Secretary, Treasurer and CFO of Eden Energy Corp., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
| (1) | the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Eden Energy Corp. for the period ended June 30, 2007 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Eden Energy Corp. |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Dated:  August 13, 2007

/s/ Donald Sharpe

Donald Sharpe, President

(Principal Executive Officer)

/s/ Drew Bonnell

Drew Bonnell

Secretary, Treasurer and CFO

(Principal Financial Officer and

Principal Accounting Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Eden Energy Corp. and will be retained by Eden Energy Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 

CW1361621.1
#### FRANCES S. ANDERSON, EXECUTRIX, ETC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. AARON *K.*NEELD, ACTING DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF TAXATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division

Argued November 5, 1951

Decided November 15, 1951.

*329Before Judges Jacobs, Eastwood and Bigelow.

*Mr. Carl Abruzzese*argued the cause for the appellant.

*Mr. William A. Moore,*Deputy Attorney-General, argued the cause for the respondent *(Mr. Theodore D. Parsons,*Attorney-General, attorney).

Per Curiam.

The executrix appeals from the assessment of the inheritance tax. The only question is the value of shares of the common stock of West Side Lumber Company, of which decedent owned 600 out of a total 15,000 shares outstanding. Since there had been no sales of the stock which established its value, the Acting Director of the Division of Taxation based his appraisal on data furnished by the executrix.

The company is engaged in the business of selling lumber which it cuts from its own lands. When the timber is all cut the company must go out of business unless it obtains a new supply. The taxpayer contends that the director did not give enough effect to the wasting nature of the business. We find to the contrary.

Testatrix died December 11, 1949. In the three fiscal years ending Eebruary 28, 1950, annual dividends averaged *330$33 a share, or seven per cent on $470. In the same period, annual net profit for common stock per share was $49 which, capitalized at percentages varying from 10 to 15, gives a value between $326 and $490 a share. Book value per share February 28, 1950, was $172.28. No good will is included in the figure. In the balance sheet, standing timber, plant and equipment, after depletion and depreciation, stood at $603,391. The same items three years earlier had been $998,713, thus indicating that the principal wasting assets were being amortized at an average of $130,000 a year, and that they would be entirely written off in less than five years.

The Tax Division regarded the value of the stock obtained by capitalizing dividends or net profits as too high, mainly because of the wasting character of the company, and accepted the book value of $172.28 as the true value of the stock. The Division considered that liquidating^ losses and expenses would be offset by excess earnings during the years now remaining of the company’s life.

The director’s appraisal of the stock was fully justified by the record.

Affirmed with costs.
§ 1250.10 Do I need to use FOIA to gain access to records at NARA? ( a ) Most *archival* records held by NARA have no restrictions to access and are available to the public for research without filing a FOIA request. You may either visit a NARA facility as a researcher to view and copy records or you may write to request copies of specific records. (See subpart B of 36 CFR part 1256 for more information about how to access archival records).
( b ) If you are seeking access to *archival* records that are not yet available to the public, you need to file a FOIA request. (See 36 CFR 1256.22 for information on how to request access to restricted archival records. See paragraph (d) of this section, and part 1260, for additional procedures on access to classified records.)
( c ) You must also file a FOIA request when you request access to NARA *operational* records (records NARA creates) that are not already available to the public.
( d ) If you are requesting records that you know are classified to protect national security interests, you may wish to use the Mandatory Declassification Review process, which is set forth at 36 CFR 1260.70. (Please see NARA's FOIA Guide, available online at *http://www.archives.gov/foia/foia-guide.html ,* for the differences between the FOIA and Mandatory Declassification Review access processes.)
§ 1202.94 What NARA systems of records are exempt from release under the Investigatory Information Material exemption of the Privacy Act? ( a ) The Personnel Security Case Files (NARA-24) system of records is eligible for exemption under 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(5) because it contains investigatory material compiled solely for the purpose of determining suitability, eligibility, or qualifications for federal employment or access to classified information. The only information exempt under this provision is that which would disclose the identity of a confidential source described in 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2).
( b ) The system of records described in paragraph (a) of this section is exempt from 5 U.S.C. 552a(d)(1). Exemption from the particular subsection is justified as access to records in the system would reveal the identity(ies) of the source(s) of information collected in the course of a background investigation.
§ 1256.62 Geological and geophysical information relating to wells. ( a ) In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(9), NARA may withhold information in records that relates to geological and geophysical information and data, including maps, concerning wells.
( b ) The Archivist of the United States may determine that this general restriction does not apply to specific records because enough time has passed that current proprietary rights are not compromised.
From: Diana Kasper

To: Christal Dennis

Cc: RON GRAVINO

Subject: Signed Notification Letter MUR 8051

Date: Wednesday, August 31, 2022 11:23:07 AM

Good morning,

In accordance with FEC guidelines, Scharfenberger for Assembly reviewed its

financial records at the time of the donation, and can confirm that the committee had

received sufficient funds subject to the limitations and prohibitions of the Federal

Election Campaign Act in order to make the contribution to Kiley for Congress.

Specifically, Scharfenberger for Assembly had sufficient funds in its account, received

from individual donors in amounts of $1,000 or less, to be able to make the

contribution. Therefore, Scharfenberger for Assembly is in compliance with 11 CFR

102.5(b).

Please let me know if you need any additional information regarding this matter.

Thank you!

Ron Gravino, Treasurer

-- 

Diana Kasper

MUR805100050
#### § 1233.3 What standards are used as guidance for this part?

These regulations conform with guidance provided in ISO 15489-1:2001. Paragraphs 7.1 (Principles of records management programmes), 8.3.3 (Physical storage medium and protection), 8.3.6 (Access, retrieval and use), 8.3.7 (Retention and disposition), 9.6 (Storage and handling), and 9.8.3 (Location and tracking) apply to records creation and maintenance.
#### JOHN BAXTER, Respondent, *v.*WILLIAM F. DRAKE, Appellant.

*Code of Civil Procedure,*§ *552*— when *a defendant may be arrested in an action brought here on a judgment obtained in a foreign State.*

Under section 552 of the Code of Civil Procedure, a defendant may be arrested in an action brought in this State upon a judgment recovered in a Circuit Court of the United States, provided he might have been so arrested had the original action been brought here.

Appeal from an order denying a motion to vacate an order of arrest.

In the years 1871 and 1872, the Exchange and Deposit Bank of Knoxville placed in defendant’s hands certain bonds of the Wilcox Mining Company, he agreeing to sell them upon commission and account to the bank for the proceeds, or upon demand to return the bonds. He refused, however, to account for eighteen of the bonds, or to return the same. The bank thereupon brought suit against the defendant in the United States Circuit Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee, to recover the value of said bonds, alleging that the defendant promised and agreed that he would redeliver the bonds to plaintiff whenever thereunto requested, and that, although demand had been duly made, the defendant refused to redeliver the same. The bank recovered a final judgment in that suit for $13,318.50. The complaint in the present action sets forth the recovery of the judgment, and its assignment to this plaintiff. The answer consists merely of a denial of any knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the assignment, and of a denial of any indebtedness.

*Sullmcm <&*Cromwell, for the appellant.

*Beach <& Bemcm,*for the respondent.

Per Curiam :

This case only involves the construction of section 552 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

*566We are of opinion that the construction given by tbe court below is correct. And on tbe grounds stated in tbe opinion of Mr. Justice Lawrence, we tbinlc tbe order must be affirmed.

Tbe following is tbe opinion of

Mr. Justice Lawrence :

Tbe order of arrest seems to bave been authorized by tbe provisions of section 552 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Tbe note to that section states that it is new, and is intended to settle a question upon which tbe decisions conflict. The authorities relied upon by tbe counsel for tbe respective parties in this case are cited in tbe note, and I do not see bow it can be argued that the section was not intended to change tbe law as declared by tbe Supreme Court, in tbe case of *Goodrich*v. *Dunbar*(17 Barb., 644). If that is not the effect of tbe section, it has no meaning whatever. Motion denied, with costs.

Present — Davis, P. J., Brady and Barrett, JJ.

Order affirmed.
# EUR-Lex - 12002E228 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 12002E228

**Treaty establishing the European Community (Nice consolidated version) - Part Five: Institutions of the Community - Title I: Provisions governing the institutions - Chapter 1: The institutions - Section 4: The Court of Justice - Article 228 - Article 171 - EC Treaty (Maastricht consolidated version) - Article 171 - EEC Treaty **

*
Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0125 - 0126 Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0271 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0061 - Consolidated version (EEC Treaty - no official publication available) *

Treaty establishing the European Community (Nice consolidated version)

Part Five: Institutions of the Community

Title I: Provisions governing the institutions

Chapter 1: The institutions

Section 4: The Court of Justice

Article 228

Article 171 - EC Treaty (Maastricht consolidated version)

Article 171 - EEC Treaty

Article 228

1. If the Court of Justice finds that a Member State has failed to fulfil an obligation under this Treaty, the State shall be required to take the necessary measures to comply with the judgment of the Court of Justice.

2. If the Commission considers that the Member State concerned has not taken such measures it shall, after giving that State the opportunity to submit its observations, issue a reasoned opinion specifying the points on which the Member State concerned has not complied with the judgment of the Court of Justice.

If the Member State concerned fails to take the necessary measures to comply with the Court's judgment within the time limit laid down by the Commission, the latter may bring the case before the Court of Justice. In so doing it shall specify the amount of the lump sum or penalty payment to be paid by the Member State concerned which it considers appropriate in the circumstances.

If the Court of Justice finds that the Member State concerned has not complied with its judgment it may impose a lump sum or penalty payment on it.

This procedure shall be without prejudice to Article 227.
# EUR-Lex - 11957E/PRO/ITALIE - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11957E/PRO/ITALIE

**TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY, PROTOCOL ON ITALY **

*

*

++++

THE HIGH CONTRACTING PARTIES ,

DESIRING to settle certain particular problems relating to Italy ,

HAVE AGREED upon the following provisions , which shall be annexed to this Treaty :

THE MEMBER STATES OF THE COMMUNITY

TAKE NOTE of the fact that the Italian Government is carrying out a ten-year programme of economic expansion designed to rectify the disequilibria in the structure of the Italian economy , in particular by providing an infrastructure for the less developed areas in Southern Italy and in the Italian islands and by creating new jobs in order to eliminate unemployment ;

RECALL that the principles and objectives of this programme of the Italian Government have been considered and approved by organisations for international cooperation of which the Member States are members ;

RECOGNISE that it is in their common interest that the objectives of the Italian programme should be attained ;

AGREE , in order to facilitate the accomplishment of this task by the Italian Government , to recommend to the institutions of the Community that they should employ all the methods and procedures provided in this Treaty and , in particular , make appropriate use of the resources of the European Investment Bank and the European Social Fund ;

ARE OF THE OPINION that the institutions of the Community should , in applying this Treaty , take account of the sustained effort to be made by the Italian economy in the coming years and of the desirability of avoiding dangerous stresses in particular within the balance of payments or the level of employment , which might jeopardise the application of this Treaty in Italy ;

RECOGNISE that in the event of Articles 108 and 109 being applied it will be necessary to take care that any measures required of the Italian Government do not prejudice the completion of its programme for economic expansion and for raising the standard of living of the population .
# EUR-Lex - 11957A010 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11957A010

**TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN ATOMIC ENERGY COMMUNITY ( E.A.E.C. - EURATOM ), TITLE TWO - PROVISIONS FOR THE ENCOURAGEMENT OF PROGRESS IN THE FIELD OF NUCLEAR ENERGY, CHAPTER I: PROMOTION OF RESEARCH, ARTICLE 10 **

*

*

++++

ARTICLE 10

THE COMMISSION MAY , BY CONTRACT , ENTRUST THE CARRYING OUT OF CERTAIN PARTS OF THE COMMUNITY RESEARCH PROGRAMME TO MEMBER STATES , PERSONS OR UNDERTAKINGS , OR TO THIRD COUNTRIES , INTERNATIONAL ORGANISATIONS OR NATIONALS OF THIRD COUNTRIES .
§ 1256.60 Information relating to financial institutions. ( a ) In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(8), NARA may withhold information in records contained in or relating to the examination, operating, or condition reports prepared by, on behalf of, or for the use of an agency responsible for the regulation or supervision of financial institutions.
( b ) The Archivist of the United States may determine that this general restriction does not apply to specific records because enough time has passed that current financial information is not compromised.
#### § 1150.76 Exceptions.

Exceptions to rulings of the judge are unnecessary. It is sufficient that a party at the time the ruling of the judge is sought, makes known the action which he/she desires the judge to take, or his/her objection to an action taken, and his/her grounds for it.
# EUR-Lex - 12002E020 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 12002E020

**Treaty establishing the European Community (Nice consolidated version) - Part Two: Citizenship of the Union - Article 20 - Article 8c - EC Treaty (Maastricht consolidated version) - **

*
Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0045 - 0045 Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0187 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0011 - Consolidated version *

Treaty establishing the European Community (Nice consolidated version)

Part Two: Citizenship of the Union

Article 20

Article 8c - EC Treaty (Maastricht consolidated version)

Article 20

Every citizen of the Union shall, in the territory of a third country in which the Member State of which he is a national is not represented, be entitled to protection by the diplomatic or consular authorities of any Member State, on the same conditions as the nationals of that State. Member States shall establish the necessary rules among themselves and start the international negotiations required to secure this protection.
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 6223** 

ANTHONY DOVE , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. IMELDA J. PATE, Assistant District Attorney

– Lenoir County; PAUL L. JONES, Resident Superior Court Judge

– Lenoir County; RIPLEY E. RAND, U.S. Attorney

– Middle District of N.C.; DAWN G. STROUD, Lenoir County Clerk of Court; LINDA MCGEE, Chief Judge, NC Court of Appeals; SAM J. ERVIN, Justice, NC Supreme Court , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States Di strict Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. Terrence W. Boyle , District Judge. ( 5:15

- ct

- 03132

- BO )

Submitted : May 26 , 2016 Decided: June 1, 2016

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and NIEMEYER and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Anthony Dove, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Anthony Dove appeals the district court’s order s dismissing , after a 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (2012) revi ew , his 42
U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action, and denying his motion for
reconsideration

. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s
orders. Dove v. Pate , No. 5:15

- ct

- 03132

- BO (E.D.N.C. Jan. 12,
2016 & Feb. 2, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### § 401.11 Property as matching funds.

The non-Federal share of the cost of projects may be in the form of real or personal property. Specific procedures to be used by grantees in placing the value on real or personal property for matching funds are set forth in Attachment F of Federal Management Circular 74-7.
# EUR-Lex - 12006E235 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12006E235

**Treaty establishing the European Community (consolidated version) - Part Five - Institutions of the Community - TITLE I - Provisions governing the institutions - Chapter 1 - The institutions - Section 4 - The Court of Justice - Article 235 **

*
Official Journal C 321 E , 29/12/2006 P. 0148 - 0148 Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0128 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0274 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0063 - Consolidated version (EEC Treaty - no official publication available) *

Article 235

The Court of Justice shall have jurisdiction in disputes relating to compensation for damage provided for in the second paragraph of Article 288.

--------------------------------------------------
# EUR-Lex - 12006E304 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12006E304

**Treaty establishing the European Community (consolidated version) - Part Six - General and final provisions - Article 304 **

*
Official Journal C 321 E , 29/12/2006 P. 0178 - 0178 Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0152 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0300 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0078 - Consolidated version (EEC Treaty - no official publication available) *

Article 304

The Community shall establish close cooperation with the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, the details of which shall be determined by common accord.

--------------------------------------------------
§ 1150.43 Answers. ( a ) Answers shall be filed by respondents within fifteen (15) days after receipt of a citation.
( b ) The answer shall admit or deny specifically and in detail, matters set forth in each allegation of the citation. If the respondent is without knowledge, the answer shall so state and such statement shall be deemed a denial. Matters not specifically denied shall be deemed admitted. Failure to file a timely answer shall constitute an admission of all facts recited in the citation.
( c ) Answers shall contain a list of additional pertinent documents not listed in the citation when respondent reasonably believes these documents are necessary for the judge to make a decision. Copies of the listed documents shall be filed with the answer.
( d ) Answers may also contain a request for a hearing under § 1150.45.