alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SUPREME COURT, COUNTY OF DELAWARE.

#### Joseph H. Ramsey, *Plaintiff, against*Jay Gould, James Fisk, Junior, Frederick A. Lane, Abram Gould, M. R. Simons, George C. Hall, Henry N. Smith, Charles G. Sisson, Henry H. Martin James B. Bach and The Erie Railway Company, *Defendants.*

A motion having been made on the complaint herein, and on the affidavits of Joseph H. Ramsey, Charles W. Douglas, Jackson S. Schultz and Ossian D- Ashley, for the sus*205pension severally of Jay Gould, James Fisk, Jr., Frederick A. Lane, Abram Gould, M. B. Simons, George C. Hall, Henry N. Smith, and Charles G. Sisson, as directors of the Erie Railway Company, and for the suspension of each of said persons as officers of said company, by reason of gross misconduct and abuse of their respective trusts and offices *°9*and good cause having been shown to the court for so doing, and on motion of Mr. Henry Smith on behalf of the plaintiff it is ordered, that said several last named persons, viz : Jay Gould, James Fisk, Jr., Frederick A. Lane, Abram Gould, M. R. Simons, George C. Hall, Henry N. Smith and Charles G. Sisson, be, and they are, and each of them is hereby suspended, both as directors and as officers of the Erie Railway Company, and that each and all the last named persons, directors and officers of the Erie Railway Company, and that each and all the last named persons, directors and officers, have and exercise no right, privilege or authority in respect to said company, or its franchises, rights or property, in any capacity whatever, till further order of this court in this case.

Secondly.—And it further appearing to the court that before the further or final exercise of its authority in respect to the suspension and removal of the directors and officers of the Erie Railway Company this day suspended, it will be necessary for the court to have before it the facts and proof that either party may desire to present upon the questions of' fact that are raised by the affidavits herein referred to, and in reference to such suspension or removal: It is ordered that Philo T. Buggies, Esq., counsellor at law, of the city of New York, be, and he is hereby, appointed a referee, with authority and direction to take the evidence upon said questions, and the proofs that the respective parties may ofier relative thereto, and to the further exercise of the powers of this court in reference to any such suspensions or removal, and report the same with all convenient dispatch to this court.

*206And it is further ordered, that such evidence and proofs be taken at such times and places, and from time to time, as said referee may direct, and that on his summons, or as may be required by subpoena, the respective parties defendants, and other persons not parties hereto, to whom any such subpoena or summons may be directed, do, pursuant thereto, attend before such referee, and submit to an examination, before him touching all the matters to which this reference relates, and as such referee shall direct.

At a special term of the supreme court, held at the village of Delhi, in the county of Delaware, on the 23d day of November, 1869.

Present.—Hon. William Murray, Jr., *Justice.*
#### § 1201.55 How will NARA collect debts through Administrative Wage Garnishment?

NARA will collect debts through Administrative Wage Garnishment in accordance with the Administrative Wage Garnishment regulations issued by the Treasury. NARA adopts, for the purposes of this subpart, the Treasury's Administrative Wage Garnishment regulations in 31 CFR 285.11.
# EUR-Lex - 12005SP004 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12005SP004

**Protocol concerning the conditions and arrangements for admission of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania to the European Union - PART ONE:PRINCIPLES - Article 4 **

*
Official Journal L 157 , 21/06/2005 P. 0030 - 0030 *

Article 4

1. The provisions of the Schengen acquis, referred to in Protocol No 17 to the Constitution on the Schengen acquis integrated into the framework of the European Union, and the acts building upon it or otherwise related to it, listed in Annex II, as well as any further such acts adopted before the date of accession, shall be binding on and applicable in Bulgaria and Romania from the date of accession.

2. Those provisions of the Schengen acquis as integrated into the framework of the European Union and the acts building upon it or otherwise related to it not referred to in paragraph 1, while binding on Bulgaria and Romania from the date of accession, shall only apply in each of those States pursuant to a European decision of the Council to that effect after verification in accordance with the applicable Schengen evaluation procedures that the necessary conditions for the application of all parts of the acquis concerned have been met in that State.

The Council shall take its decision, after consulting the European Parliament, acting with the unanimity of its members representing the Governments of the Member States in respect of which the provisions referred to in this paragraph have already been put into effect and of the representative of the Government of the Member State in respect of which those provisions are to be put into effect. The members of the Council representing the Governments of Ireland and of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland shall take part in such a decision insofar as it relates to the provisions of the Schengen acquis and the acts building upon it or otherwise related to it in which these Member States participate.

--------------------------------------------------
Case 16-25473 Doc 1 Filed 08/09/16 Entered 08/09/16 09:06:22 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 10
Case 16-25473 Doc 1 Filed 08/09/16 Entered 08/09/16 09:06:22 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 10
Case 16-25473 Doc 1 Filed 08/09/16 Entered 08/09/16 09:06:22 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 10
Case 16-25473 Doc 1 Filed 08/09/16 Entered 08/09/16 09:06:22 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 10
Case 16-25473 Doc 1 Filed 08/09/16 Entered 08/09/16 09:06:22 Desc Main

 Document Page 5 of 10
Case 16-25473 Doc 1 Filed 08/09/16 Entered 08/09/16 09:06:22 Desc Main

 Document Page 6 of 10
Case 16-25473 Doc 1 Filed 08/09/16 Entered 08/09/16 09:06:22 Desc Main

 Document Page 7 of 10
Case 16-25473 Doc 1 Filed 08/09/16 Entered 08/09/16 09:06:22 Desc Main

 Document Page 8 of 10
Case 16-25473 Doc 1 Filed 08/09/16 Entered 08/09/16 09:06:22 Desc Main

 Document Page 9 of 10
Case 16-25473 Doc 1 Filed 08/09/16 Entered 08/09/16 09:06:22 Desc Main

 Document Page 10 of 10
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 559

To amend the Packers and Stockyards Act, 1921, to make it unlawful

for any stockyard owner, market agency, or dealer to transfer or market

nonambulatory livestock, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 25, 1993

Mr. ACKERMAN (for himself, Mr. BROWN of California, Mr. GONZALEZ, Mr.

JACOBS, Mr. LANTOS, Mr. MFUME, Mr. RAVENEL, and Mr. SHAYS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture

A BILL

To amend the Packers and Stockyards Act, 1921, to make

it unlawful for any stockyard owner, market agency,

or dealer to transfer or market nonambulatory livestock,

and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Downed Animal Pro5 tection Act’’.
2

•HR 559 IH

1 SEC. 2. UNLAWFUL STOCKYARD PRACTICES INVOLVING

2 NONAMBULATORY LIVESTOCK.

3 Title III of the Packers and Stockyards Act, 1921,

4 is amended by inserting after section 317 (7 U.S.C. 217a)

5 the following new section:

6 ‘‘SEC. 318. UNLAWFUL STOCKYARD PRACTICES INVOLVING

7 NONAMBULATORY LIVESTOCK.

8 ‘‘(a) DEFINITION.—As used in this section, the term

9 ‘humanely euthanized’ means to kill an animal by mechan10 ical, chemical, or other means that rapidly and effectively

11 renders the animal insensitive to pain.

12 ‘‘(b) UNLAWFUL ACT.—It shall be unlawful for any

13 stockyard owner, market agency, or dealer to buy, sell,

14 give, receive, transfer, market, or hold nonambulatory live15 stock unless the livestock has been humanely euthanized.’’.

16 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

17 This Act and the amendment made by this Act shall

18 become effective 1 year after the date of enactment of this

19 Act.

Æ
Case 16-26870 Doc 1 Filed 08/22/16 Entered 08/22/16 12:56:57 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 10
Case 16-26870 Doc 1 Filed 08/22/16 Entered 08/22/16 12:56:57 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 10
Case 16-26870 Doc 1 Filed 08/22/16 Entered 08/22/16 12:56:57 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 10
Case 16-26870 Doc 1 Filed 08/22/16 Entered 08/22/16 12:56:57 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 10
Case 16-26870 Doc 1 Filed 08/22/16 Entered 08/22/16 12:56:57 Desc Main

 Document Page 5 of 10
Case 16-26870 Doc 1 Filed 08/22/16 Entered 08/22/16 12:56:57 Desc Main

 Document Page 6 of 10
Case 16-26870 Doc 1 Filed 08/22/16 Entered 08/22/16 12:56:57 Desc Main

 Document Page 7 of 10
Case 16-26870 Doc 1 Filed 08/22/16 Entered 08/22/16 12:56:57 Desc Main

 Document Page 8 of 10
Case 16-26870 Doc 1 Filed 08/22/16 Entered 08/22/16 12:56:57 Desc Main

 Document Page 9 of 10
Case 16-26870 Doc 1 Filed 08/22/16 Entered 08/22/16 12:56:57 Desc Main

 Document Page 10 of 10
**THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

**Post Office Box 12248**

**Austin, Texas 78711**

**(512) 463-1312**

May 28, 2010

Mr. Larry Parks

106 East Sixth Street, Suite 300

Austin, TX 78701-3661

Ms. Peggy S. Supak

151 N Washington St.

La Grange, TX 78945

Mr. Jeff Rex Steinhauser

P.O. Box 277

Flatonia, TX 78941

Mr. Max E. Roesch

P. O. Box 925

Giddings, TX 78942

Mr. Gordon A. Holloway

1415 Louisiana, Suite 2550

Houston, TX 77002

RE:Case Number:  09-0772

Court of Appeals Number:  03-05-00057-CV

Trial Court Number:  2002V-159

Style:TEXAS HEALTH INSURANCE RISK POOL

v.

SHARON B. SIGMUNDIK, BENJAMIN J. SIGMUNDIK AND ZACHARY P. SIGMUNDIK, AS THE SOLE AND LEGAL HEIRS AND BENEFICIARIES OF THOMAS M. SIGMUNDIK, DECEASED, AND/OR OF THE ESTATE OF THOMAS M. SIGMUNDIK, DECEASED; OTTO L. MONECKE AND VIRGINIA L. MONECKE

Dear Counsel:

Today the Supreme Court of Texas issued an opinion in the above-referenced cause.  You may obtain a copy of the opinion at: http://www.supreme.courts.state.tx.us/historical/recent.asp.  If you would like the opinion by email, please contact Claudia Jenks at claudia.jenks@courts.state.tx.us or call (512)463-1312 ext. 41367.  

Sincerely,

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

by Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk

Enclosure

**Case No. 09-0772Page 2**
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, *v.*George B. McClellan, Appellant.

(Argued April 24, 1907;

decided May 10, 1907.)

*People*v. *McClellan,*118 App. Div. *177,*affirmed.

Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered March 8, 1907, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying a motion to set aside the summons and complaint in an action of quo warranto and the service thereof as unlawful.

The following is the question certified: *“*Was the determination of former Attorney-General Mayer, denying the application of William Randolph Hearst for leave to bring an action in the nature of quo warranto to try the title to the office of Mayor of the City of New York, a har to his successor in acting under the authority vested in him by law in bringing this action ? ”

*Eugene Lamb Richards, Jr.,*and *C. L>. B. Hasbrouck*for appellant.

*William Schuyler Jackson, Attorney-Ceneral (Charles A. JDolson*of counsel),1 for respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs, on opinion of Ingraham, J., below and question certified answered in the negative.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Werneb, Willabd Babtlett and Hiscook, JJ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

          - [Transmittal No. 06-28]

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 July 1996.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Ms. J. Hurd, DSCA/DBO/ADM, (703) 604-6575.                              ( print page 54619)    

The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Transmittal 06-28 with attached transmittal and policy justification.

C.R. Choate,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

      ( print page 54620)          ( print page 54621)          ( print page 54622)    

BILLING CODE 5001-06-M

[FR Doc. 06-7722 Filed 9-15-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
### Gas station test/component pricing Perkins, Rick to

: Lynn Dail Cc : "Hagan, Fred D" Dail, Sorry for the delay but below is a price list of Stage II versus conventional gasoline station parts. These are approximate prices from various sources. Maine stations follow CARB requirements such as annual pressure decay and A/L testing for most with b lockage required every five years (unless retesting is triggered). I believe you have product drop tube prices so they are not included here. Contact either Fred Hagan (207 - 822 - 6300) or me with any questions. Good luck and looking forward to EPA’s final decision on ST - 30 (1994) versus TP -201.3. 

### Rick Perkins Maine DEP, Bureau of Air Quality 312 Canco Road Portland, Maine 04103 (207) 822 - 6355 (p) (207) 822 - 6303 (f) rick.perkins@maine.gov
Stage II Testing- Larger Station (more than 6 dispensers):
 Flat rate of about $900 to include (PD, TIE, P/V, BLK, A/L).Stage II Testing- Smaller Station (6 dispensers or less):

 Flat rate of about $750 to include (PD, TIE, P/V, BLK, A/L).
Individual Cost/Breakdown of Stage II Tests:
 PD= $350  TIE= $50  P/V= $75  BLK= $275  A/L= $350
Cost of Stage II Equipment (this would not include labor which averages about $70/hour):
 Vac Assist Nozzle= $235  Balance Nozzle= $200  Breakaway= $125  12” Wh ip Hose= $60  8’ Hose= $185  Flow restrictor= $75  Swivel Fill Adapter= $ 185  Swivel Vapor Adapter= $230  Plastic Fill Cap= $30  Plastic Vapor Cap= $32  Low Profile Fill Cap= $65  Low Profile Vapor Cap= $62  Standard 4” brass fill adapter= $45  Standard 4” Aluminum Vapor Adapter= $85
 P/V Vent Cap= $110  Vac Motor= $430 (plus $179 core charge)

Conventional Dispenser Equipment Costs Nozzle= $52

 Hose (10’)= $41  Breakaway= $28  Breakaway hose (8”)= $15.00
#### § 12.10 Floral and commemorative tributes.

The placement on a grave of fresh cut or artificial flowers in or on a metal or other non-breakable rod or container designated by the superintendent is allowed at times designated by the superintendent. The placement of a statue, vigil light, or other commemorative object on a grave, or the securing or attaching of any object to a headstone, marker or commemorative monument is prohibited.
Your session is about to expire.Resume session

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Welcome.Log inorregisterCOPS OFFICE RESOURCE CENTER

HomeCatalogCartOrders

                    

Publications and More764 publications • 16 categoriesSee the complete catalogThis Week's HighlightPolice OperationsExplore the topicRecent Publications10 publications added since 11/5/2023See the latest itemsHistorical PerspectiveThis day through the yearsLast year•2•5•10•20 years agoSearch the Resources LibrarySearch titles and abstractsFind text: Go

                    

FOIA | No FEAR Act | Open Government | Privacy | Legal|HelpCopyright (C) U.S. Department of Justice, COPS Office, IT Division, 2012 - 2024. All rights reserved.
Rendered on Mon Mar 4 2024 at 00:16 (UTC-5) in 0.17 secEnterprise Framework 3.21.7.7 • Store Controls 3.3.1.7Survey 500303407 Section 60000559 Rules Hints Inactive
# EUR-Lex - 12004V188 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V188

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART III — THE POLICIES AND FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - TITLE III — INTERNAL POLICIES AND ACTION - CHAPTER II — ECONOMIC AND MONETARY POLICY - Section 2 — Monetary policy - Article III-188 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0083 - 0083 *

Article III-188

When exercising the powers and carrying out the tasks and duties conferred upon them by the Constitution and the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank, neither the European Central Bank, nor a national central bank, nor any member of their decision-making bodies shall seek or take instructions from Union institutions, bodies, offices or agencies, from any government of a Member State or from any other body. The Union institutions, bodies, offices or agencies and the governments of the Member States undertake to respect this principle and not to seek to influence the members of the decision-making bodies of the European Central Bank or of the national central banks in the performance of their tasks.

--------------------------------------------------
State of New York

Supreme Court, Appellate Division

Third Judicial Department

Decided and Entered: November 20, 2014 515841 

________________________________

CAROL B. RONOVECH,

Appellant,

v MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

CITY OF ONEONTA,

Respondent.

________________________________

Calendar Date: October 7, 2014

Before: Lahtinen, J.P., Stein, McCarthy, Rose and Clark, JJ.

__________

Catherine E. Stuckart, Binghamton, for appellant.

The Mills Law Firm, Clifton Park (Christopher K. Mills of

counsel), for respondent.

__________

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Coccoma, J.),

entered September 19, 2012 in Otsego County, which granted

defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Order affirmed, upon the opinion of Justice Michael V.

Coccoma. 

Lahtinen, J.P., Stein, McCarthy, Rose and Clark, JJ.,

concur.
-2- 515841 

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger

Clerk of the Court
Case 16-26516 Doc 1 Filed 08/18/16 Entered 08/18/16 09:43:03 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 10
Case 16-26516 Doc 1 Filed 08/18/16 Entered 08/18/16 09:43:03 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 10
Case 16-26516 Doc 1 Filed 08/18/16 Entered 08/18/16 09:43:03 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 10
Case 16-26516 Doc 1 Filed 08/18/16 Entered 08/18/16 09:43:03 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 10
Case 16-26516 Doc 1 Filed 08/18/16 Entered 08/18/16 09:43:03 Desc Main

 Document Page 5 of 10
Case 16-26516 Doc 1 Filed 08/18/16 Entered 08/18/16 09:43:03 Desc Main

 Document Page 6 of 10
Case 16-26516 Doc 1 Filed 08/18/16 Entered 08/18/16 09:43:03 Desc Main

 Document Page 7 of 10
Case 16-26516 Doc 1 Filed 08/18/16 Entered 08/18/16 09:43:03 Desc Main

 Document Page 8 of 10
Case 16-26516 Doc 1 Filed 08/18/16 Entered 08/18/16 09:43:03 Desc Main

 Document Page 9 of 10
Case 16-26516 Doc 1 Filed 08/18/16 Entered 08/18/16 09:43:03 Desc Main

 Document Page 10 of 10
#### § 8.202 Basis and purpose.

In order to elevate the Nation's cybersecurity posture and provide consumers with assurances regarding their baseline cybersecurity, thereby addressing risks of harmful radiofrequency interference to and from consumer internet-connected (Internet of Things or IoT) products the Federal Communications Commission establishes a labeling program for consumer IoT products.
Exhibit 23.1




                          Independent Auditor's Consent


We consent to the  incorporation  by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
of Maverick Tube  Corporation  of our report dated October 29, 1997,  and of the
reference to our firm under the caption "Historical Financial Information", both
included in the 1997 Annual Report to Shareholders of Maverick Tube Corporation.
Our audits also  included  the  financial  statement  schedule of Maverick  Tube
Corporation  listed in Item 14(a).  This schedule is the  responsibility  of the
Company's  management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our
audits. In our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above, when
considered  in  relation  to the basic  financial  statements  taken as a whole,
presents fairly in all material  respects the  information set forth  therein.We
also consent to the  incorporation  by reference in the  Registration  Statement
(Form  S-3  No.  33-56568)  of  Maverick  Tube  Corporation  and in the  related
Prospectus and in the Registration  Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-89526) pertaining
to the Maverick  Tube  Corporation  Amended and Restated 1990 Stock Option Plan,
the Maverick  Tube  Corporation  1994 Stock Option Plan,  and the Maverick  Tube
Corporation  Director  Stock  Option Plan of Maverick  Tube  Corporation  of our
report  dated  October 29,  1997,  with  respect to the  consolidated  financial
statements and schedule of Maverick Tube  Corporation  included and incorporated
by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended  September 30,
1997. 

                                                    /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

St. Louis, Missouri
December 3, 1997