alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                   AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

   I, Amanda Harington, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10QSB of Celtron International, Inc.

2. Based on my knowledge, the report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by the report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in the report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of Celtron
International, Inc. as of, and for, the periods presented in the report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as such term is defined in Regulation 13a-14 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934) for Celtron International, Inc., and have:

i. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to Celtron International, Inc., including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which the periodic reports are being prepared;

ii. Evaluated the effectiveness of Celtron International, Inc.'s disclosure
controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
the report ("Evaluation Date"); and

iii. Presented in the report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation
Date;

5. I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the Celtron
International, Inc. auditors and the audit committee of the board of directors
(or persons fulfilling the equivalent function):

i. All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect Celtron International, Inc.'s ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for Celtron
International, Inc.'s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls;
and
ii. Any  fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the issuer's internal controls; and

6. I and the other certifying officer have indicated in the report whether or
not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors
that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our
most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: May 31, 2005

/s/ Amanda Harington
----------------------
Amanda Harington
Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32-2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of WNC HOUSING TAX CREDIT FUND VI, L.P., SERIES 7 (the “Partnership”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), and pursuant to 18 U.S.C., section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Melanie R. Wenk, Vice President-Chief Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc., general partner of the Partnership, hereby certify that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.








/s/MELANIE R. WENK


Melanie R. Wenk


Vice President-Chief Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.
Case 16-29080 Doc 13 Filed 09/14/16 Entered 09/15/16 09:28:50 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
835 P.2d 687

#### STATE of Idaho, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Lon Ora LAYMON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 19811.

Court of Appeals of Idaho.

Aug. 4, 1992.

*453Severt Swenson Jr., Swenson & Scoggin, Gooding, for defendant-appellant.

Larry EchoHawk, Atty. Gen., Myma A.I. Stahman, Deputy Atty. Gen., for plaintiff-respondent.

SWANSTROM, Judge.

Lon Laymon appeals from a unified five-year sentence, with a minimum fixed term of three years, imposed upon a conviction for burglary. I.C. §§ 18-1401, -1402. question of whether the district court abused its sentencing discretion is the only issue presented in this appeal.

On or about August 27, 1991, Laymon unlawfully entered the Governor’s Mansion Bed and Breakfast in Shoshone, Idaho, and took food valued over $150 from a freezer in the home. Through plea negotiations, a second count of grand theft was dismissed in exchange for Laymon’s guilty plea to first degree burglary.

The presentence report shows that Laymon’s record consists of a prior burglary conviction, and a number of misdemeanor convictions. Laymon’s previous attempts at probation were unsuccessful and apparently did nothing to rehabilitate Laymon or deter him from criminal conduct. In his comments at sentencing, the judge reviewed all of the factors to be weighed in considering whether to impose a period of incarceration or probation. The judge found that Laymon was not a candidate for probation.

Laymon’s explanation for his bad judgment in committing the crime was that he was desperate to feed his family. The court rejected this argument in view of the fact that Laymon and his companion, who were intoxicated when they committed the crime, apparently had money to buy liquor, which they chose over food. Furthermore, the district judge noted that the children in Laymon’s home had been taken out of the home by the authorities, revealing that Laymon was not being honest with the court.

Having reviewed the record and considered the sentence review criteria announced in *State v. Toohill,*103 Idaho 565, 650 P.2d 707 (Ct.App.1982), we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in imposing a five-year sentence with a three-year determinate period of confinement. From the facts and circumstances of the case, Laymon has not shown that the sentence imposed was excessive under any reasonable view of the facts. *State v. Broadhead,*120 Idaho 141, 814 P.2d 401 (1991), *overruled on other grounds*by *State v. Brown,*121 Idaho 385, 825 P.2d 482 (1992).

The judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.

WALTERS, C.J., and SILAK, J., concur.
#### § 12.4 Special events and demonstrations.

Conducting a special event or demonstration, whether spontaneous or organized, is prohibited except for official commemorative events conducted for Memorial Day, Veterans Day and other dates designated by the superintendent as having special historic and commemorative significance to a particular national cemetery. Committal services are excluded from this restriction.
§ 76.912 Joint certification. ( a ) Franchising authorities may apply for joint certification and may engage in joint regulation, including, but not limited to, joint hearings, data collection, and ratemaking. Franchising authorities jointly certified to regulate their cable system(s) may make independent rate decisions.
( b ) Franchising authorities may apply for joint certification regardless of whether the authorities are served by the same cable system or by different cable systems and regardless of whether the rates in each franchising area are uniform.
§ 1001.1 Purpose. ( a ) The regulations in this chapter provide for the proper use, management, government and protection of persons, property and natural and cultural resources within the area under the jurisdiction of the Presidio Trust.
( b ) The regulations in this chapter will be utilized to fulfill the statutory purposes of the Presidio Trust Act.
NUMBER 13-16-00532-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

LUKE GONZALEZ, Appellants,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On appeal from the 361st District Court

of Brazos County, Texas.

ORDER ABATING APPEAL

Before Justices Garza, Perkes, and Longoria

Order Per Curiam

This cause is before the Court because the reporter’s record cannot be 

completed. 1 The reporter’s record in this cause was originally due to be filed on 

 

1 This case is before the Court on transfer from the Tenth Court of Appeals in Waco pursuant to a 

docket equalization order issued by the Supreme Court of Texas. See TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN. § 73.001 

(West, Westlaw through 2015 R.S.). 
2

September 9, 2016. On November 18, 2016, reporter Wendy L. Kirby advised this Court 

that she is unable to complete the record by the current due date of November 28, 2016, 

without obtaining a bond hearing transcript from reporter Felix Thompson. The hearings 

designated for the reporter’s record include a bond hearing on September 3, 2014 in 

which Mr. Thompson was the reporter. Ms. Kirby has contacted Mr. Thompson on 

several occasions but has not received a reply regarding the status of his portion of the 

record. Without the record from the hearing held on September 3, 2014, Ms. Kirby 

cannot complete the master index and file a complete reporter’s record.

 This sequence of events requires us to effectuate our responsibility to avoid further 

delay and to preserve the parties’ rights. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(a)(1). Accordingly, 

this appeal is ABATED and the cause REMANDED to the trial court.

Upon remand, the judge of the trial court shall determine if the reporter’s record, 

or any part thereof, has been lost or destroyed, and shall make appropriate findings under 

Tex. R. App. P. 34.6(f), if necessary. Otherwise, the court shall determine what steps 

are necessary to ensure the prompt preparation of a reporter's record, and shall enter any 

orders required to avoid further delay and to preserve the parties’ rights. 

The trial court shall prepare and file its findings and orders and cause them to be 

included in a supplemental clerk's record which should be submitted to the Clerk of this 

Court within thirty days from the date of this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
3

Delivered and filed this

the 5th day of December, 2016.
EXHIBIT 10.1 - Trust Agreement



EXHIBIT 10.1


 


 

 

September 30, 2006


 

CHANCERY RESOURCES, INC. 

3rd Floor, 422 Richards Street

Vancouver, British Columbia

Canada   V6B 2Z4


Ladies and Gentlemen:


RE:     Hunter Claims, BC


Pursuant to an agreement between Chancery Resources, Inc. and Geoffrey Gachallan dated September 30, 2006, Geoffrey Gachallan, the owner of the claims, will hold in trust for Chancery Resources, Inc., a 100% undivided interest in the subject claims under the terms of the agreement:



	 	 	
Number of 
	
Date of 

	
Tenure No.

	
Claim Name

	
MTO Cells

	
Expiration


	

     540601
	

               Hunter
	

9
	

September 7, 2007







 

Geoffrey Gachallan will deliver full title on demand to Chancery Resources, Inc. when all terms and conditions have been met regarding the aforementioned agreement.


 

Yours truly,


 

GEOFFREY GACHALLAN

Geoffrey Gachallan
# EUR-Lex - 12004V351 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V351

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART III — THE POLICIES AND FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - TITLE VI — THE FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - CHAPTER I — PROVISIONS GOVERNING THE INSTITUTIONS - Section 1 — The institutions - Subsection 4 — The European Commission - Article III-351 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0155 - 0155 *

Article III-351

The Commission shall act by a majority of its members. Its Rules of Procedure shall determine the quorum.

--------------------------------------------------
# EUR-Lex - 12004V160 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V160

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART III — THE POLICIES AND FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - TITLE III — INTERNAL POLICIES AND ACTION - CHAPTER I — INTERNAL MARKET - Section 4 — Capital and payments - Article III-160 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0068 - 0068 *

Article III-160

Where necessary to achieve the objectives set out in Article III-257, as regards preventing and combating terrorism and related activities, European laws shall define a framework for administrative measures with regard to capital movements and payments, such as the freezing of funds, financial assets or economic gains belonging to, or owned or held by, natural or legal persons, groups or non-State entities.

The Council, on a proposal from the Commission, shall adopt European regulations or European decisions in order to implement the European laws referred to in the first paragraph.

The acts referred to in this Article shall include necessary provisions on legal safeguards.

--------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 32.2

                         GLOBAL BEVERAGE SOLUTIONS, INC.
               FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2005
                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Bryce Knight, certify that

4.       I am the Chief Financial Officer of Global Beverage Solutions, Inc.
5.       Attached  to this  certification  is Form  10-Q for the  quarter  ended
         September 30, 2005, a periodic report (the "periodic  report") filed by
         the issuer with the Securities  Exchange Commission pursuant to Section
         13(a)  or  15(d)  of the  Securities  and  Exchange  Act of  1934  (the
         "Exchange Act"), which contains financial statements.
6.       I hereby  certify,  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as  adopted
         pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
         o        The periodic report containing the financial  statements fully
                  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
                  the Exchange Act, and
         o        The information in the periodic report fairly presents, in all
                  material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of
                  operations of the issuer for the periods presented.


November 11, 2005                                         /s/ Bryce Knight
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         Bryce Knight
                                                         Chief Financial Officer


A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by Global Beverage Solutions,  Inc.
and  furnished  to the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  or its staff upon
request.

This  certification will not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise  subject to the liability of that
section.  This  certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference
into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities  Exchange Act
of 1934 even if the document  with which it is submitted to the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission is so incorporated by reference.
#### § 1250.93 Discharge of wastes.

Vessels operating on fresh water lakes or rivers shall not discharge sewage, or ballast or bilge water, within such areas adjacent to domestic water intakes as are designated by the Commissioner of Food and Drugs.

Cross Reference:

For Environmental Protection Agency's regulations for vessel sanitary discharges as related to authority under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended ([33 U.S.C. 1314](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/33/1314) *et seq.*), see [40 CFR part 140](/on/2024-09-23/title-40/part-140).

[[40 FR 5624](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/40-FR-5624), Feb. 6, 1975, as amended at [48 FR 11432](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/48-FR-11432), Mar. 18, 1983]
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 523 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 523

To amend the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 to permit 
 retirement plans to consider certain factors in investment decisions.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 16, 2023

 Ms. Smith (for herself, Mrs. Murray, Mrs. Feinstein, Mr. Blumenthal, 
    Mr. Durbin, Ms. Warren, Mr. Sanders, Mr. Wyden, and Mr. Markey) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
          Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 to permit 
 retirement plans to consider certain factors in investment decisions.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Freedom to Invest in a Sustainable 
Future Act''.

SEC. 2. ERISA AMENDMENTS.

    Subsection (a) of section 404 of the Employee Retirement Income 
Security Act of 1974 (29 U.S.C. 1104) is amended by adding at the end 
the following new paragraph:
    ``(3)(A) Provided that a fiduciary discharges the fiduciary's 
duties with respect to a plan in a manner otherwise consistent with 
this subsection, a fiduciary may--
            ``(i) consider environmental, social, governance, or 
        similar factors, in connection with carrying out an investment 
        decision, strategy, or objective, or other fiduciary act; and
            ``(ii) consider collateral environmental, social, 
        governance, or similar factors as tie-breakers when competing 
        investments can reasonably be expected to serve the plan's 
        economic interests equally well with respect to expected return 
        and risk over the appropriate time horizon.
    ``(B) In a case described in clause (i) or (ii) of subparagraph 
(A), a fiduciary shall not be required to maintain any greater 
documentation, substantiation, or other justification of the 
fiduciary's actions relating to such fiduciary act than is otherwise 
required under this part.
    ``(C) Nothing in this part shall preclude an investment selected in 
accordance with clause (i) or (ii) of subparagraph (A) from being 
treated as a default investment or a component of such a default 
investment (as described in regulations issued by the Secretary under 
subsection (c)(5)(A)), if such investment would otherwise qualify for 
such treatment under such regulations.''.
                                 <all>
```
---

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Ian R. McNeil, President and Chief Executive Officer of
Searchlight Minerals Corp. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company, for
      the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2006, and to which this
      certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                              



| | By:    | /s/ Ian R. McNeil                          
| | ------ | -------------------------------------------
| |        |                                            
| | Name:  | IAN R. MCNEIL                              
| |        |                                            
| | Title: | President and Chief Executive
      Officer
| |        |                                            
| | Date:  | November 13, 2006                          



A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-QSB to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-QSB), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

2 Initially, Rothstein also argued that he was denied due process during sentencing. He has abandoned this point. See Reply Brief. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-50593 Summary Calendar

HAROLD ALLEN ROTHSTEIN, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus JANET M. RENO, Attorney General; R.V. FRANCO, Warden; UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS, Respondents-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-96-CV-283

- - - - - - - - - - May 21, 1998 Before WISDOM, WIENER, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges
PER CURIAM: * Harold Rothstein, federal prisoner # 02736-003, appeals the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 motion. He argues that he should receive credit for presentence detention time toward his sentence for violating his probation. 2 Rothstein’s sentence for violating his probation is to runNo. 97-50593 -2- consecutively with his sentence for violating his parole. Rothstein received credit for the presentence detention time towards his separate parole-violation sentence. He does not have a right to double credit for the time served. See Radcliffe v. Clark , 451 F.2d 250, 251-52 (5th Cir. 1971). The judgement is AFFIRMED.
Editorial Note on Part 622
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 622 appear at 79 FR 57837, Sept. 26, 2014 and at 81 FR 32253, May 23, 2016.

§ 622.32 Prohibited gear and methods. Also see § 622.9 for additional prohibited gear and methods that apply more broadly to multiple fisheries or in some cases all fisheries. ( a ) *Poisons.* A poison may not be used to take Gulf reef fish in the Gulf EEZ.
( b ) [Reserved]