alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 86.94 Must I give information to eligible users and the public about BIG-funded facilities? ( a ) You must give clear information using signs or other methods at BIG-funded facilities that: ( 1 ) Direct eligible users to the BIG-funded facility;
( 2 ) Include restrictions and operating periods or direct boaters where to find the information; and
( 3 ) Restrict ineligible use at any part of the BIG-funded facility designated only for eligible use. ( i ) You do not need to notify facility users of any restrictions for shared-use areas and amenities that you have already decided have predictable mixed use and you have allocated following § 86.19.
( ii ) You must notify facility users of benefits that you decide are only for eligible users, such as boat slips and moorage.
( b ) You may use new technology and methods of communication to inform boaters.
#### Albert H. Aronson, appellee, v. John P. E. Carlson, appellant.

Filed March 14, 1913.

No. 17,098.

Appeal: Affirmance. Where the record brought to the supreme court on appeal contains no bill of exceptions, the judgment of the district court, if sustained by the pleadings, will be affirmed.

Appeal from the district court for Polk county: George P. Corcoran, Judge.

*Affirmed,*

*John Tongue,*for appellant.

*Mills & Beebe, contra.*

Barnes, J.

Action in the district court for Polk county to recover a balance alleged to he due plaintiff on a judgment rendered against defendant and in plaintiff’s favor in the district court for the county and city of Denver, in the state of Colorado. Plaintiff had the judgment, and the defendant has appealed.

The record brought to this court contains no hill of exceptions, and therefore the only question presented for' our determination is, are the pleadings sufficient to support the judgment? The transcript discloses that plaintiff’s petition was in the usual form of a declaration on a foreign judgment-. Defendant’s answer does not challenge the jurisdiction of the district court of the state of Colorado in which the judgment sued on was rendered. It contains no allegation of fraud on the part of plaintiff in obtaining the judgment, and contains no plea of payment or satisfaction.

As we view the record, the pleadings are sufficient to sustain the judgment of the district court, and it is therefore

Affirmed.
Your session is about to expire.Resume session

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Welcome.Log inorregisterCOPS OFFICE RESOURCE CENTER

HomeCatalogCartOrders

                    

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                CatalogMatches: 1Offline form Recent Popular Online Print OtherCOPS-P322Intelligence-Led Community Policing, Community Prosecution, and Community PartnershipsIntelligence-Led Community Policing, Community Prosecution, and Community Partnerships (IL3CP) is a unique approach to community policing that extends community partnerships to include prosecutorial and community service organizations along with law enforcement. The innovative program was developed and refined by the Rockland County District Attorney's Office (RCDAO) in New York State. Based on the promising implementation, the International Association of Chiefs of Police worked with diverse three jurisdictions - Mesa, Arizona; Newport News, Virginia; and Saint Paul, Minnesota - to implement similar approaches tailored to their circumstances and needs. This publication provides an overview of the initial program as implemented in Rockland County, as well as the efforts to pilot IL3CP in the other jurisdiction and the important lessons learned about benefits, successes, and challenges in implementing this innovative approach.By International Association of Chiefs of PoliceCategories: Community Partnerships • Foundations of Community PolicingLanguage: EnglishLow stockPublic linkhttps://portal.cops.usdoj.gov/resourcecenter?item=cops-p322Click here to see the entire catalog.Cart:Download PDFBook • Feb 2016Search catalogreset title abstract authors contentContaining text: exact phraseNot containing text: exact phraseLanguage:anyEnglishSpanishHmongVietnameseCategory:anyAlternatives to IncarcerationCommunity PartnershipsData and AnalysisEthics and IntegrityFoundations of Community PolicingHiring, Recruitment, and RetentionHomeland SecurityNew Immigrant CommunitiesNonviolent CrimeOtherPolice OperationsPOP Center ResourceSchool and Campus SafetyTechnologyTribalViolent CrimeYouth SafetyPublished after:Published before:Page1

                    

FOIA | No FEAR Act | Open Government | Privacy | Legal|HelpCopyright (C) U.S. Department of Justice, COPS Office, IT Division, 2012 - 2024. All rights reserved.
Rendered on Mon Mar 4 2024 at 05:19 (UTC-5) in 0.89 secEnterprise Framework 3.21.7.7 • Store Controls 3.3.1.7Survey 500303407 Section 60000560 Rules Hints Inactive
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Delta Regional Authority","provider_url":"https:\/\/dra.gov","author_name":"Aha! Creative","author_url":"https:\/\/dra.gov\/author\/admin\/","title":"Regional Development Plan - Delta Regional Authority","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"eic1JakoYB\"><a href=\"https:\/\/dra.gov\/about\/strategic-development-plan\/\">Regional Development Plan<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/dra.gov\/about\/strategic-development-plan\/embed\/#?secret=eic1JakoYB\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Regional Development Plan” — Delta Regional Authority\" data-secret=\"eic1JakoYB\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"Regional Development Plan IV Download the Regional Development Plan DRA’s Regional Development Plan IV will guide the agency’s strategic priorities and actions from 2023 through 2027 to help the region build on previous successes and maximize future opportunities. While the plan identifies regional challenges, it also identifies regional assets, strategies, and action steps that will […]","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/dra.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/Depositphotos_58300089_XL-1024x681.jpg"}
§ 600.1502 Communications functionality. ( a ) Unless otherwise specified, this subsection applies to all VMS units. Units that can operate as both an EMTU and EMTU-C must meet the requirements for both an EMTU and an EMTU-C in order to gain type-approval as both. The VMS unit must: ( 1 ) Be able to transmit all automatically-generated position reports.
( 2 ) Provide visible or audible alarms onboard the vessel to indicate malfunctioning of the VMS unit.
( 3 ) Be able to disable non-essential alarms in non-Global Maritime Distress and Safety System (GMDSS) installations.
( 4 ) EMTU/EMTU-Cs must be able to send communications that function uniformly throughout the geographic area(s) covered by the type-approval, except an EMTU-C only needs to be capable of transmission and reception when in the range of a cellular network.
( 5 ) EMTU/EMTU-Cs must have two-way communications between the unit and authorized entities, via MCS, or be able to connect to a device that has two-way communications.
( 6 ) EMTU/EMTU-Cs must be able to run or to connect to a dedicated message terminal and display component that can run software and/or applications that send and receive electronic forms and internet email messages for the purpose of complying with VMS reporting requirements in Federal fisheries. Depending on the reporting requirements for the fishery(s) in which the requester is seeking type-approval, an EMTU-C type-approval may not require the inclusion of a dedicated message terminal and display component at the time of approval, but the capability to support such a component must be shown.
( 7 ) Have messaging and communications mechanisms that are completely compatible with NMFS vessel monitoring and surveillance software.
( b ) In addition, messages and communications from a VMS unit must be able to be parsed out to enable clear billing of costs to the government and to the owner of a vessel or EMTU/EMTU-C, when necessary. Also, the costs associated with position reporting and the costs associated with other communications (for example, personal email or communications/reports to non-NMFS Office of Law Enforcement entities) must be parsed out and billed to separate parties, as appropriate.
p. 1 

## 33336~ 

# U

P rI- 

# Zovl-05,3~ RF~CE !V~i1 ACETO Aceto Corporation I I FEB 23 AM 6 : 07 RECD MAR 1 1 

# 2011 4 Tri Harbor Court Port Washington, NY 11050 Tel : (516) 627 6000 Fax: (516) 627 6093 www .aceto .com IIIIIIIIIII IIIII IIt1311 111 IIIII IIIII I11$ IIIIIIIIIII1UIIt 0 1 1 0 0 Febru uary 6,2011 a Document Control Office (DCO) (7407M) Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics (OPPT) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1200 Pennsylvania Ave, NW Washington, DC 20460-0001 ATTN : TSCA Section 4 - Docket Identification Number EPA-HQ-OPPT-2007-0531 Re : Application for Exemption, Section 4 Test Rule, Methanesulfinic Acid, Hydrozy-, mono sodium salt CAS#149-44-0, Testing of certain high production volume chemicals ; Second group of Chemicals, Federal Register, Vol . 76, No. 5, January 7, 2011, 40 CFR 799.5087 Dear Sir or Madam

: Aceto Corporation submits this application for exemption fromthe requirements for testing Methanesulfinic Acid, Hydroxy-, mono sodium salt CAS#149-44-0 under TSCA Section 4 Test Rule as noted above. As part of our exemption application we are providing the following information: (a) The identity ofthe test rule, the chemical identity, and the CAS No. ofthe test substance on which the application is based. Testing of certain high production volume chemicals; Second group of Chemicals, Federal Register, Vol . 76, No. 5, January 7, 2011, 40 CFR 799.5087, Methanesulfinic Acid, Hydrozy-, mono sodiumsalt CAS#149-44-0 . (b) We are requesting an exemption fromall testing requirements for Methanesulfinic Acid, Hydrozy-, mono sodiumsalt CAS#149-44-0 under 40 CFR 799.5087 because we believe that this material is already being sponsored for testing (per above) by another party. (c) Name, address, and telephone number of applicant . ACETOCorporation 4 Tri Harbor Court Port Washington, NY 11050 516-627-6000 (d) Name, address, and telephone number of appropriate individual to contact for further information. Suhey Francisco. Regulatory Affairs Specialist - Environmental, Health, Safety and Regulatory Affairs ACETOCorporation 4 Tri Harbor Court Port Washington, NY 11050 

# CONTAINS NOCBt

### 516-627-6000

As per 40 CFR 790.99, ACETOCorporation provides our Statement of financial responsibility per our application for exemption: I (ACETO Corporation) understand that ifthis application is granted before the reimbursement period described in section 4(c)(3)(B) of TSCA expires, ACETOCorporation must pay fair and equitable reimbursement to the person or persons who incurred or shared in the costs of complying with the requirement to submit data and upon whose data the granting of my application was based. Ifyou have any further questions please contact me . Sincerely, i ~y~-----R

' Franci~'co. Regulatory Affairs Specialist - Environmental, Health, Safety and Regulatory Affairs ACETO Corporation
#### § 1212.115 Does this part affect the Federal contracts that I receive?

It will affect future contract awards indirectly if you are debarred or suspended for a violation of the requirements of this part, as described in § 1212.510(c). However, this part does not apply directly to procurement contracts. The portion of the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988 that applies to Federal procurement contracts is carried out through the Federal Acquisition Regulation in chapter 1 of Title 48 of the Code of Federal Regulations (the drug-free workplace coverage currently is in 48 CFR part 23, subpart 23.5).
###### Editorial Note on [Part 1926](/current/title-29/part-1926?toc=1)

#### Editorial Notes:

1. At [44 FR 8577](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/44-FR-8577), Feb. 9, 1979, and corrected at [44 FR 20940](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/44-FR-20940), Apr. 6, 1979, OSHA reprinted without change the entire text of [29 CFR part 1926](/on/2024-09-23/title-29/part-1926) together with certain General Industry Occupational Safety and Health Standards contained in [29 CFR part 1910](/on/2024-09-23/title-29/part-1910), which have been identified as also applicable to construction work. This republication developed a single set of OSHA regulations for both labor and management forces within the construction industry.

2. Nomenclature changes to part 1926 appear at [84 FR 21597](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/84-FR-21597), May 14, 2019.

#### § 1926.1152 Methylene chloride.

Note:

The requirements applicable to construction employment under this section are identical to those set forth at [29 CFR 1910.1052](/on/2024-09-23/title-29/section-1910.1052).

[[62 FR 1619](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/62-FR-1619), Jan. 10, 1997]
EXHBIT  32.1
------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION  906  OF  THE  SARBANES-OXLEY  ACT  OF  2002

In  connection  with  the  Quarterly Report of Bluetorch, Inc (the "Company") on
Form  10-qsb  for  the  period  ending  September  30,  2003,  as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on  the date hereof (the "Report"), Bruce
MacGregor,  Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his
knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

(2)  The  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  result  of operations of the Company.



/s/  BRUCE  MACGREGOR
-----------------------------
Bruce  MacGregor
Chief  Executive  Officer





                                November 19, 2003
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, e xcept under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and col lateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judg ments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and condi tions 10th Cir. R. 36.3.



### UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Filed 8/15/96 TENTH CIRCUIT

DAVID CHRISTOPHER WHITE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v. ADAMS COUNTY DETENTION FACILITY, SHERIFF CAMP, W. T. SHEARER, Sheriff; PENNY BROWN, Former Jail Director; MELANIE GREGORY, Technical Services Manager; DONALD JARVIS, Captain; SGT. DEBACA, DEPUTY ARGO, SGT. HERSEY, SGT. TOTTEM, SGT. BAILY, SGT. TWEDEN, J. J. LONG, Sgt., Defendant-Appellees. No. 95-1525 (D.C. No. 94-S-2478) (Colorado)



### ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
Before SEYMOUR , Chief Judge, KELLY and LUCERO , Circuit Judges. After examining the briefs and appellate record, th is panel has determined-2-

unanimously that oral argument would not materiallyassist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The c ause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. Mr. David C. White filed this pro se action under 4 2 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that the Adams County Detention Facility and several state officials violated his Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights during his incarceration. The district court dismissed Mr. Wh ite’s complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) and denied him leave to proceed in forma pauperis on this appeal. This matter is before the court on Mr. White’s moti on for leave to proceed on appeal without prepayment of costs or fees. In order to succeed on his motion, Mr. White must show both : (1) a financial inability to pay the required fil ing fees and (2) the existence of a nonfrivolous argument onthe law and facts in support of the issues raised on appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a); Coppedge v. United States , 369 U.S. 438 (1962); DeBardeleben v. Quinlan , 937 F.2d 502 (10th Cir. 1991). We agree with the district court that Mr. White canmake no rational argument on the law or facts in support of the issu es raised on appeal. Therefore, the motion for leave to proceed on appeal without p repayment of costs or fees is denied substantially for the reasons given by the d istrict court.-3-

The decision of the district court is AFFIRMED. Th e mandate shall issue forthwith. ENTERED FOR THE COURT Stephanie K. Seymour Chief Judge
# EUR-Lex - 12004V045 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V045

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART I - TITLE VI — THE DEMOCRATIC LIFE OF THE UNION - Article I-45 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0034 - 0034 *

Article I-45

The principle of democratic equality

In all its activities, the Union shall observe the principle of the equality of its citizens, who shall receive equal attention from its institutions, bodies, offices and agencies.

--------------------------------------------------
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 187 (Wednesday, September 27, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 56567-56568]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-8292]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Advisory Committee for Biological Sciences (BIO); Notice of 
Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Advisory Committee for Biological Sciences (BIO) (1110).

[[Page 56568]]

    Dates and Time: November 2, 2006; 9 a.m.-5 p.m., November 3, 
2006; 9 a.m.-3 p.m.
    Place: National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., 
Arlington, VA 22230, Room 375.
    Type of Meeting: Open.
    Contact Person: Dr. Joanne Tornow, Senior Advisor for Strategic 
Planning, Policy and Analysis, Biological Sciences, Room 605, 
National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 
22230 Tel. No.: (703) 292-8400.
    Minutes: May be obtained from the contact person listed above.
    Purpose of Meeting: The Advisory Committee for BIO provides 
advice, recommendations, and oversight concerning major program 
emphases, directions, and goals for the research-related activities 
of the divisions that make up BIO.
    Agenda: Joint session with the Education and Human Resources 
Directorate Planning and Issues Discussion:

<bullet> BIO Status and FY 07 Budget.
<bullet> NSF Strategic Plan.
<bullet> NEON Update.
<bullet> Committee of Visitors Reports.

    Dated: September 22, 2006.
Joann P. Roskoski,
Executive Officer, Biological Sciences.
[FR Doc. 06-8292 Filed 9-26-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
# EUR-Lex - 11997E082 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11997E082

**Treaty establishing the European Community (Amsterdam consolidated version) - Part Three: Community policies - Title VI: Common rules on competition, taxation and approximation of laws - Chapter 1: Rules on competition - Section 1: Rules applying to undertakings - Article 82 - Article 86 - EC Treaty (Maastricht consolidated version) - Article 86 - EEC Treaty **

*
Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0209 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0029 - Consolidated version (EEC Treaty - no official publication available) *

Treaty establishing the European Community (Amsterdam consolidated version)

Article 82

Any abuse by one or more undertakings of a dominant position within the common market or in a substantial part of it shall be prohibited as incompatible with the common market insofar as it may affect trade between Member States.

Such abuse may, in particular, consist in:

(a) directly or indirectly imposing unfair purchase or selling prices or other unfair trading conditions;

(b) limiting production, markets or technical development to the prejudice of consumers;

(c) applying dissimilar conditions to equivalent transactions with other trading parties, thereby placing them at a competitive disadvantage;

(d) making the conclusion of contracts subject to acceptance by the other parties of supplementary obligations which, by their nature or according to commercial usage, have no connection with the subject of such contracts.