alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
rSy'0t.li(M83P02'8^ 

.•<t;s^. 

m ^ ^ STATE OF MISSISSIPPI 

IS''^^11 1 OFHCE OF THE GOVERNOR 

HALEY BARBOUR 

GOVERNOR 

August 24,2010 R f?i^'^ -

r-n-o.m 

Honorable Raymond LaHood ' =d^ Q 

Secretary of Transportation -=9 §2^" ^ 

US Department of Transportation CD e n 

CO 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

RE: Docket DOT-OST-2010-0124 

Dear Mr. Secretary, 

I am writing in support of the Small Community Air Service Grant application being submitted 

by the Jackson Municipal Airport Authority. 

The Jackson Municipal Airport is located in Jackson, Mississippi, and provides essential air 

service for state government and regional businesses. The Authority will use this funding for 

marketing efforts to better inform the local community of the services offered by the airport and 

to educate the airlines that currently provide service to the region about our needs. 

The Jackson Municipal Airport Authority is working diligently to match the needs of central 

Mississippi with current and potential services available by airlines. I am hopeful you will give 

their proposal your strongest consideration. 

POST OFFICE BOX 139 • JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI 39205 • TEL (60t) 359-31 SO • FAX (601) 359-3741 • www.govetnoAarboui.com
BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

In the Matter of )

Colorado Republican State Central 

Committee

)

)

)

AO 2023-03

Agenda Document No. 23-09-A

CERTIFICATION

I, Vicktoria J. Allen, recording secretary for the Federal Election Commission open 

meeting on May 04, 2023, do hereby certify that the Commission decided by a vote of 6-0 to 

approve Agenda Document No. 23-09-A, subject to revising footnote 22 by deleting the sentence 

that follows, “Id.”

Commissioners Broussard, Cooksey, Dickerson, Lindenbaum, Trainor, and Weintraub 

voted affirmatively for the decision.

Attest:

 May 9, 2023

Date Vicktoria J. Allen

Deputy Secretary of the Commission
# EUR-Lex - 11965F016 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11965F016

**TREATY ESTABLISHING A SINGLE COUNCIL AND A SINGLE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, CHAPTER II: THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, ARTICLE 16 **

*
Official Journal L 152 , 13/07/1967 P. 0006 *

++++

ARTICLE 16

THE COMMISSION SHALL ADOPT ITS RULES OF PROCEDURE SO AS TO ENSURE THAT BOTH IT AND ITS DEPARTMENTS OPERATE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THE TREATIES ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN COAL AND STEEL COMMUNITY , THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY AND THE EUROPEAN ATOMIC ENERGY COMMUNITY , AND OF THIS TREATY . IT SHALL ENSURE THAT THESE RULES ARE PUBLISHED .
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03
- 18
- 00399
- CR

The State of Texas, Appellant

v. Edmund Koko Kahookele, Appellee

FROM THE 207TH DISTR ICT COURT OF COMAL C OUNTY NO. CR2017
- 356, THE HONORABLE GARY L. ST EEL, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R
PER CURIAM Appellant’s brief on appeal was originally due July 23, 2018. On counsel’s
motions , the time for filing was extended to September 21, 2018 . Appellant’s counsel has now
filed a third motion, requesting that the Court extend the time f or filing appellant’s brief. W e grant the motion for extension of time and order appellant to file a brief no later than October 18,
2018 . No further extension of time will be granted and failur e to comply with this order may
result in dismissal of this appeal.
It is ordered on September 24, 2018.

Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Pemberton and Field
Do Not Publish
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 184 (Friday, September 22, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 55545]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-8099]



[[Page 55545]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board

[STB Ex Parte No. 290 (Sub-No. 5) (2006-4)]


Quarterly Rail Cost Adjustment Factor

AGENCY: Surface Transportation Board, DOT.

ACTION: Approval of rail cost adjustment factor.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Board has approved the fourth quarter 2006 rail cost 
adjustment factor (RCAF) and cost index filed by the Association of 
American Railroads. The fourth quarter 2006 RCAF (Unadjusted) is 1.250. 
The fourth quarter 2006 RCAF (Adjusted) is 0.591. The fourth quarter 
2006 RCAF-5 is 0.562.

DATES: Effective Date: October 1, 2006.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mac Frampton, (202) 565-1541. [Federal 
Information Relay Service (FIRS) for the hearing impaired: 1-800-877-
8339.]

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Additional information is contained in the 
Board's decision, which is available on our Web site http://www.stb.dot.gov. To purchase a copy of the full decision, write to, e-
mail or call the Board's contractor, ASAP Document Solutions; 9332 
Annapolis Rd., Suite 103, Lanham, MD 20706; e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f6978597869295b68093849f8c9998d8989382"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5c3d2f3d2c383f1c2a392e3526333272323928">[email protected]</span></a>; 
phone (202) 306-4004. [Assistance for the hearing impaired is available 
through FIRS: 1-800-877-8339.]
    This action will not significantly affect either the quality of the 
human environment or energy conservation.
    Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b), we conclude that our action will not 
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small 
entities within the meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

    Decided: September 14, 2006.

    By the Board, Chairman Nottingham, Vice Chairman Mulvey and 
Commissioner Buttrey.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 06-8099 Filed 9-21-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 99.1

                         CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                          18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                          AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Biophan Technologies, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended August 31, 2002, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Michael L. Weiner, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to the
best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

    (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
     the Company.


/s/Michael L. Weiner
----------------------
Michael L. Weiner
Chief Executive Officer
October 15, 2002
#### § 1201.54 Can a judgment I have obtained against the United States be used to satisfy a debt that I owe to NARA?

Collection by offset against a judgment obtained by a debtor against the United States will be accomplished in accordance with 31 U.S.C. 3728 and 31 U.S.C. 3716.
Case 16-28727 Doc 12 Filed 09/23/16 Entered 09/27/16 17:16:33 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
#### § 1915.1010 Benzidine.

Note:

The requirements applicable to shipyard employment under this section are identical to those set forth at [§ 1910.1003 of this chapter](/on/2024-09-23/title-29/section-1910.1003).

[[61 FR 31430](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/61-FR-31430), June 20, 1996]
#### § 1254.14 Are some procedures in regional archives and Presidential libraries different from those in the Washington, DC, area?

Yes, the variety of facilities, locations of research rooms, room sizes, and other factors contribute to differences in some, but not all, practices from the Washington, DC, area. When the appropriate regional director of archival operations or Presidential library director indicates, you must follow the procedures in regional archives and Presidential library archival research rooms where researchers use original documents. These procedures are in addition to the procedures we specify elsewhere in this part. The procedures are either posted in the facility or the staff gives copies of them to researchers.
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2


              [LETTERHEAD OF MILLER AND LENTS, LTD. APPEARS HERE]

                              March 30, 2001

Cross Timbers Oil Company
810 Houston Street, Suite 2000
Fort Worth, TX 76102

                                            Re:  Cross Timbers Oil Company
                                                 2000 Annual Report on Form 10-K

Gentlemen:

     The firm of Miller and Lents, Ltd., consents to the use of its name and to
the use of its report dated March 27, 2001, regarding the Cross Timbers Oil
Company Proved Reserves and Future Net Revenue as of December 31, 2000 in the
2000 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

     Miller and Lents, Ltd., has no interests in Cross Timbers Oil Company or in
any affiliated companies or subsidiaries and is not to receive any such interest
as payment for such reports and has no director, officer, or employee otherwise
connected with Cross Timbers Oil Company.  We are not employed by Cross Timbers
Oil Company on a contingent basis.

                              Yours very truly,

                              MILLER AND LENTS, LTD.


                              By     /s/ James C. Pearson
                                   --------------------------------
                                   James C. Pearson
                                   President
§ 221.10 Who may represent a party, and what requirements apply to a representative? ( a ) *Individuals.* A party who is an individual may either represent himself or herself in the hearing process under this subpart or authorize an attorney to represent him or her.
( b ) *Organizations.* A party that is an organization or other entity may authorize one of the following to represent it: ( 1 ) An attorney;
( 2 ) A partner, if the entity is a partnership;
( 3 ) An officer or agent, if the entity is a corporation, association, or unincorporated organization;
( 4 ) A receiver, administrator, executor, or similar fiduciary, if the entity is a receivership, trust, or estate; or
( 5 ) An elected or appointed official or an employee, if the entity is a Federal, State, tribal, county, district, territorial, or local government or component.
( c ) *Appearance.* An individual representing himself or herself and any other representative must file a notice of appearance. The notice must: ( 1 ) Meet the form and content requirements for documents under § 221.11;
( 2 ) Include the name and address of the party on whose behalf the appearance is made;
( 3 ) If the representative is an attorney, include a statement that he or she is a member in good standing of the bar of the highest court of a state, the District of Columbia, or any territory or commonwealth of the United States (identifying which one); and
( 4 ) If the representative is not an attorney, include a statement explaining his or her authority to represent the entity.
( d ) *Lead representative.* If a party has more than one representative, the ALJ may require the party to designate a lead representative for service of documents under § 221.13.
( e ) *Disqualification.* The ALJ may disqualify any representative for misconduct or other good cause.
Case 16-25815 Doc 1 Filed 08/11/16 Entered 08/11/16 13:24:27 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 8
Case 16-25815 Doc 1 Filed 08/11/16 Entered 08/11/16 13:24:27 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 8
Case 16-25815 Doc 1 Filed 08/11/16 Entered 08/11/16 13:24:27 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 8
Case 16-25815 Doc 1 Filed 08/11/16 Entered 08/11/16 13:24:27 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 8
Case 16-25815 Doc 1 Filed 08/11/16 Entered 08/11/16 13:24:27 Desc Main

 Document Page 5 of 8
Case 16-25815 Doc 1 Filed 08/11/16 Entered 08/11/16 13:24:27 Desc Main

 Document Page 6 of 8
Case 16-25815 Doc 1 Filed 08/11/16 Entered 08/11/16 13:24:27 Desc Main

 Document Page 7 of 8
Case 16-25815 Doc 1 Filed 08/11/16 Entered 08/11/16 13:24:27 Desc Main

 Document Page 8 of 8
# EUR-Lex - 12007L/AFI/DCL/02 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12007L/AFI/DCL/02

**Treaty of Lisbon amending the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Community, signed at Lisbon, 13 December 2007 - A. Declarations concerning provisions of the Treaties - 2. Declaration on Article 6(2) of the Treaty on European Union **

*
Official Journal 306 , 17/12/2007 P. 0249 - 0249 *

2. Declaration on Article 6(2) of the Treaty on European Union

The Conference agrees that the Union's accession to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms should be arranged in such a way as to preserve the specific features of Union law. In this connection, the Conference notes the existence of a regular dialogue between the Court of Justice of the European Union and the European Court of Human Rights; such dialogue could be reinforced when the Union accedes to that Convention.

--------------------------------------------------
# EUR-Lex - 12004V175 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V175

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART III — THE POLICIES AND FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - TITLE III — INTERNAL POLICIES AND ACTION - CHAPTER I — INTERNAL MARKET - Section 7 — Common provisions - Article III-175 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0075 - 0075 *

Article III-175

1. Where there is reason to fear that the adoption or amendment of a provision laid down by law, regulation or administrative action of a Member State may cause distortion within the meaning of Article III-174, a Member State desiring to proceed therewith shall consult the Commission. After consulting the Member States, the Commission shall address to the Member States concerned a recommendation on such measures as may be appropriate to avoid the distortion in question.

2. If a Member State desiring to introduce or amend its own provisions does not comply with the recommendation addressed to it by the Commission, other Member States shall not be required, pursuant to Article III-174, to amend their own provisions in order to eliminate such distortion. If the Member State which has ignored the recommendation of the Commission causes distortion detrimental only to itself, Article III-174 shall not apply.

--------------------------------------------------
§ 1010.14 Review of proposals by project applicants. ( a ) An EA shall be required for each proposal for demolition, construction, reconstruction, development, preservation, rehabilitation, or restoration of real property submitted by a project applicant to the Trust for its review, and which the decision-maker agrees to consider, unless categorically excluded or covered by a previously prepared EA and/or EIS.
( b ) The decision-maker may not take any approval action on such a proposal submitted by a project applicant until such time as the appropriate environmental review documents have been prepared and submitted to the decision-maker.
( c ) At a minimum, and as part of any submission made by a project applicant to the decision-maker for its approval, such project applicant shall make available data and materials concerning the proposal sufficient to permit the Trust to carry out its environmental review responsibilities. When requested, the project applicant shall provide additional information that the NEPA Compliance Coordinator believes is necessary to permit it to satisfy its environmental review functions.
( d ) With respect to each project proposed for consideration for which the NEPA Compliance Coordinator determines that an EA shall be prepared, the decision-maker may require a project applicant to submit a draft EA regarding its proposal for the Trust's evaluation and revision. In accordance with 40 CFR 1506.5(b), the Trust shall make its own evaluation of the environmental issues and shall take responsibility for the scope and content of the final EA.
( e ) With respect to each project proposed for consideration for which the NEPA Compliance Coordinator determines an EIS shall be prepared, the decision-maker may require a project applicant to pay a non-refundable fee to the Trust sufficient to cover a portion or all of the Trust's anticipated costs associated with preparation and review of the EIS, including costs associated with review under other applicable laws. Such fee shall be paid to the Trust in full prior to commencement of the preparation of the EIS or any amendment or supplement thereto.
( f ) In accordance with 40 CFR 1506.5(c), the EIS shall be prepared by the Trust and/or by contractors who are selected by the Trust and who certify that they have no financial or other interest in the outcome of the project, and the Trust shall independently evaluate the EIS prior to its approval and take responsibility for ensuring its adequacy. The EIS shall be prepared in accordance with 40 CFR part 1502.
( g ) The NEPA Compliance Coordinator may set time limits for environmental review appropriate to each proposal, consistent with 40 CFR 1501.8 and 1506.10.
( h ) The NEPA Compliance Coordinator shall at the earliest possible time ensure that the Trust commences its environmental review on a proposed project and shall provide the project applicant with any policies or information deemed appropriate in order to permit effective and timely review by the Trust of a proposal once it is submitted to the decision-maker for approval.
Document

Exhibit 10.2

AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE
TO THE
BRIGHTHOUSE SERVICES, LLC
TEMPORARY INCENTIVE DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN
(Restated as of March 13, 2018)
------------------
WHEREAS, the final payment under the Brighthouse Services, LLC Temporary Incentive Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Plan”) was made on June 26, 2020 and no other payments from the Plan are or will be due and owing; and


WHEREAS, Brighthouse Services, LLC desires to officially terminate the Plan; and


WHEREAS, the Plan Administrator of the Plan is authorized to terminate the Plan pursuant to Section 21 of the Plan.


NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended and terminated, effective as of the date this amendment is executed as set forth below, as follows:


Section 17 of the Plan is hereby amended by adding the following new paragraph at the end thereof to read as follows:


“Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan to the contrary, the Plan is terminated as of 11:59PM on July 1, 2020.”


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this amendment has been executed by the Plan Administrator of the Plan, on this 1st day of July 2020.




PLAN ADMINISTRATOR




			
	/s/ Micah Dowling
	Micah Dowling




						
	Witness:	/s/ Elyse Milito 
		




1
#### § 1212.655 Individual.

*Individual* means a natural person.
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5256

To guarantee the ability of licensed pharmacists to conduct the practice

of pharmacy compounding and to ensure their right to the necessary

supply of bulk drug products, subject to applicable State and Federal

laws.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 7, 1994

Mr. BREWSTER (for himself and Mr. DELAY) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

A BILL

To guarantee the ability of licensed pharmacists to conduct

the practice of pharmacy compounding and to ensure

their right to the necessary supply of bulk drug products,

subject to applicable State and Federal laws.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Pharmacy

5 Compounding Preservation Act of 1994’’.
2

•HR 5256 IH

1 SEC. 2. APPLICATIONS OF STATE AND FEDERAL LAW TO

2 THE PRACTICE OF PHARMACY

3 COMPOUNDING.

4 Amend section 210(gg) of the Food, Drug and Cos5 metic Act (21 U.S.C. 321(gg)): ‘‘Notwithstanding any

6 other provision of law, the provisions of this Act do not

7 apply to licensed retail pharmacies that compound drugs

8 in conformance with applicable local laws regulating the

9 practice of pharmacy and medicine. The provisions of this

10 Act do not apply to bulk drug products that are intended

11 to be used by pharmacies for compounding, except to the

12 extent that such provisions relate directly to the purity

13 and quality of such bulk drug products.’’

Æ
#### § 70.6 Public entry and use.

The public entry and use provisions set forth in part 26 of this chapter are equally applicable to national fish hatchery areas.

###### Editorial Note

#### Editorial Note:

For Federal Register citations to special regulations issued under § 70.6, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov.*
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-40452

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JEINER PEREZ-PEREZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:16-CR-1846-1

Before JONES, DENNIS, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jeiner Perez-Perez

has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with 

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 

229 (5th Cir. 2011). Perez-Perez has filed a response. We have reviewed 

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well 

as Perez-Perez’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 20, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 17-40452 Document: 00514281113 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/20/2017
No. 17-40452

2

appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, 

counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from 

further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR.

R. 42.2. Perez-Perez’s motion for appointment of substitute counsel is 

DENIED.

 Case: 17-40452 Document: 00514281113 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/20/2017
4% 

OFFICE OF THE A’ITORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 
91 a o ultd hma oro nr uy l ppr vo lr to 

your 8aovu to thlo quart f oal 

“‘ooa 0 uouaty tudgo 66 th0 M 0r 

0 ~6idrt0 r0r 0 skw or 08i tbr 0rri0i01 

brldt for tho OunW l lootloa to bo hU4.o- To&u 3 lgb2, 1r tho ooodl~oto lr la tha 

ua ltrA.60 d Arm4 roroor an6 ho0 aot fllod 

an rrribrtit or 1 l lty rlth tin l!i*oretuy of 

Stoto 00 roqulna 7 y Artiok 1978 04 Arta or 

the b?th Laglu.atur*~ 19U?” _ 

36otloa 1 or Art&U0 Wk, -84 0 l a rollovol 

%ootlOP 1. Noflreon sIiUlbo>earlttato ho10 hi0 nam l L*rropoa uia 

offlak bUlot l o l oaa d &at. r0r on offlam 

la tab stoto ualmrr ana mtll ho rb i 1 ri3.6 vltb tho seontax7 or stat0 hia rrrlmit, la o fork to bo prooorlb.4 by the ACtomoy 

QO~UU, th0t u 0iO0t0d tO th0 0fri0o rhfsh 

ho onka br will mlupport Md d0r0nd the 

conotltullon mb lAv0 or tho unitbb stat.0 

on& or hZIJ* sub rfM&atlt Bull further 

no At th a t l UOh 0a.iaa0 bolirvar in, rpproroo or Md if ao,toa vlll wpport and 

d6rti 0~ pnourt npn00drur0 r0a or 

gOWfU0Ukt~ ti du Z00$0t 0Ciy l rfO?t O? 

mfmoat fror say mrnuaa vhloh rwkr to wblO?t Or dra?Of th0 JOB0 Or My pOZ% thOPOOr~ 

tJ#of the mooulino tom huoia o&Al bo 

owrtruo4to Lrroludo tha roal.alaor~ 

ml0 l tatuta io plrin Mb Prurrbbuau8 and, *hi& 

it ha8 aot bema pram4 ppon br otv Oourtr, it ir thr opbioa 

of t&l8 40 rtxmttbtoam iabb~ordauotbo oompU.6 

vlth in OT ku Sor I o8n6Mate to bar, hlo nuy upan the otrlolol bollotr %lU6fOrO, W 0ll-r YOUR 

tin on6 hold that 0 OWaty j&.&O JOnnOt 

0 omdidato for a rrttlo 0rri00 00 the of 

tho Oaonl olrotion fo bo hold Norrkr 3, 1962, under the 

rO0t0 ~ta0a by foor