alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Home About Our Companies 

# Our Companies Learn more about the companies. San Diego Gas & Electric(http://www.sempra.com/about/ourcompanies/SDGE.shtml) Southern California Gas Co.(http://www.sempra.com/about/ourcompanies/southern-california-gasco.shtml) Sempra U.S. Gas & Power(http://www.sempra.com/about/ourcompanies/semprausgp.shtml) Sempra International(http://www.sempra.com/about/ourcompanies/semprainternational.shtml) LNG (http://www.sempralng.com/) Sempra Energy’s California utilities, San Diego Gas & Electric Co. and Southern California Gas Co., serve more than 20 million consumers. And its other businesses – Sempra U.S. Gas & Power and Sempra International – develop and operate critic al energy infrastructure and pr ovide gas and electricity servi ces in North America and South America.

Pipelines

1 Joint Venture with BP Wind Energy 2 Joint Venture with Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P. and ConocoPhillips Not to scale Not to scale

Sempra U.S. Gas & Power, LLC and Sempra International, LLC are not the same company as the California utilities, San Diego Gas & Electric (SDG&E) or Southern California Gas Company (SoCalGas), and Sempra U.S. Gas & Power, LLC and Sempra International, LLC are not regulated by the California Public Utilities Commission. Note: Formerly known as entities Sempra Generation, Sempra LNG and Sempra Pipelines & Storage have now been realigned under Sem pra International and Sempra U.S. Gas & Power. 

# Page 1 of 1 Sempra Energy | Our Companies

7 / 31 /201 5 http://www.sempra.com/about/our -companies /
###### Editorial Note on [Part 1926](/current/title-29/part-1926?toc=1)

#### Editorial Notes:

1. At [44 FR 8577](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/44-FR-8577), Feb. 9, 1979, and corrected at [44 FR 20940](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/44-FR-20940), Apr. 6, 1979, OSHA reprinted without change the entire text of [29 CFR part 1926](/on/2024-09-23/title-29/part-1926) together with certain General Industry Occupational Safety and Health Standards contained in [29 CFR part 1910](/on/2024-09-23/title-29/part-1910), which have been identified as also applicable to construction work. This republication developed a single set of OSHA regulations for both labor and management forces within the construction industry.

2. Nomenclature changes to part 1926 appear at [84 FR 21597](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/84-FR-21597), May 14, 2019.

#### § 1926.1106 Methyl chloromethyl ether.

Note:

The requirements applicable to construction work under this section are identical to those set forth at [§ 1910.1003 of this chapter](/on/2024-09-23/title-29/section-1910.1003).

[[61 FR 31433](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/61-FR-31433), June 20, 1996]
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**Certification of Chief Executive Officer furnished pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Exchange Act and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title18 of the United States Code (18 U.S. C. 1350)**

 

I, JohnMacneil, the acting President and Chief Executive Officer of Trikon Technologies, Inc (the “Company”), do hereby certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that: 

 

1. The Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 (the“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 780(d)); and 

 

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Company. 

 

Dated:  March 15, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                  OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                748
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                      15,906
<ALLOWANCES>                          391
<INVENTORY>                        61,685
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   86,053
<PP&E>                            101,772 
<DEPRECIATION>                     31,893
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    156,885
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              25,691
<BONDS>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                              154 
<OTHER-SE>                              0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      156,885
<SALES>                           269,591
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  265,389
<CGS>                             232,038
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      14,815
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  1,731
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    16,805
<INCOME-TAX>                        5,420
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                11,385
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                       11,385
<EPS-PRIMARY>                         .74
<EPS-DILUTED>                         .73
        

</TABLE>
NUMBER 13-22-00006-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG 

SOMER RACHELLE NESLONEY, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On appeal from the 36th District Court

of Aransas County, Texas.

ORDER OF ABATEMENT

Before Justices Longoria, Hinojosa, and Silva

Order Per Curiam

The cause is before the Court on appellant’s motion for leave and time extension 

to file appellant’s brief. However, on February 15, 2022, the Clerk of the Court notified 

appellant’s counsel that it appears there is no final, appealable order in this matter. 

Appellant’s counsel was given thirty days to correct the defect, if it could be done. 

Appellant’s counsel has failed to correct the defect and has not filed any response to the 

clerk’s notice.
2

Accordingly, we carry appellant’s motion, abate the appeal, and remand the cause 

to the trial court for further proceedings. Upon remand, the trial court shall utilize whatever 

means necessary to make appropriate findings and recommendations concerning the 

following: (1) whether appellant desires to prosecute this appeal; (2) why appellant's 

counsel has failed to file a response regarding the defect in the notice of appeal and 

whether counsel has effectively abandoned the appeal; (3) whether appellant has been 

denied effective assistance of counsel; (4) whether appellant's counsel should be 

removed; and (5) whether appellant is indigent and entitled to court-appointed counsel.

If the trial court determines appellant does want to continue the appeal, present 

counsel should be removed, and appellant is indigent and entitled to court-appointed 

counsel, the trial court shall appoint new counsel to represent appellant in this appeal. If 

new counsel is appointed, the name, address, email address, telephone number, and 

state bar number of said counsel shall be included in an order appointing counsel.

The trial court shall cause its findings and recommendations, together with any 

orders it may enter regarding the aforementioned issues, to be filed in a supplemental 

clerk's record. Furthermore, the trial court shall cause a supplemental reporter's record of 

any proceedings to be prepared. The supplemental clerk’s record and supplemental 

reporter's record, if any, shall be filed with the Clerk of this Court on or before the 

expiration of thirty days from the date of this order.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed on the

27th day of April, 2022.
Street Address: 950 West Basin Road New Casrle, DE 19720 Moiling Address: p.o. Box 15505 Wilmington, DE 19850 (302) 324-2500 (BOO) 235-9100

Fax Numbers: Accounting: 314-2554 Circulation; 324-2945 Classified: 324-5511 HmlCIl Resoorces: 324-2578 Info Systems: 324-2969 Marketing; 324-2557 News: 324-5509 Retail : 324-5518 Legal Desk 302-324-2676 Legal Fax 302-324-2249 

# AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION State of Delaware

Personally appeared before me this 3rd day of May, 2010. I, Kristin Segner, ofThe News Journal Company, a daily newspaper printed and published in the County of New Castle County, State of Delaware, who, being Quly sworn states that the advertisement of SID DNREC Air Quality Management - LEGAL NOTICE-PUBLIC HEARING 6/2/2010 was published in The News Journal on May 2, 2010
Legal Coordinator Title

Sworn to before me this 3rd day of May, 2010
Notary Public 

### Wanda James · Notary Public State of Delaware Commission expires 11/02/2012

,' • .. --:::-**,>~,\,'** .. -. •**'~ ~**  \" ; " ....**~** -- ---
# EUR-Lex - 12004V151 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V151

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART III — THE POLICIES AND FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - TITLE III — INTERNAL POLICIES AND ACTION - CHAPTER I — INTERNAL MARKET - Section 3 — Free movement of goods - Subsection 1 — Customs Union - Article III-151 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0064 - 0065 *

Article III-151

1. The Union shall comprise a customs union which shall cover all trade in goods and which shall involve the prohibition between Member States of customs duties on imports and exports and of all charges having equivalent effect, and the adoption of a common customs tariff in their relations with third countries.

2. Paragraph 4 and Subsection 3 on the prohibition of quantitative restrictions shall apply to products originating in Member States and to products coming from third countries which are in free circulation in Member States.

3. Products coming from a third country shall be considered to be in free circulation in a Member State if the import formalities have been complied with and any customs duties or charges having equivalent effect which are payable have been levied in that Member State, and if they have not benefited from a total or partial drawback of such duties or charges.

4. Customs duties on imports and exports and charges having equivalent effect shall be prohibited between Member States. This prohibition shall also apply to customs duties of a fiscal nature.

5. The Council, on a proposal from the Commission, shall adopt the European regulations and decisions fixing Common Customs Tariff duties.

6. In carrying out the tasks entrusted to it under this Article the Commission shall be guided by:

(a) the need to promote trade between Member States and third countries;

(b) developments in conditions of competition within the Union insofar as they lead to an improvement in the competitive capacity of undertakings;

(c) the requirements of the Union as regards the supply of raw materials and semi-finished goods; in this connection the Commission shall take care to avoid distorting conditions of competition between Member States in respect of finished goods;

(d) the need to avoid serious disturbances in the economies of Member States and to ensure rational development of production and an expansion of consumption within the Union.

--------------------------------------------------
C.RECEIVEDnr‘12009STATEOFDELAWAREEPA.REGIONIllDEPARTMENTOFNATURALRESOURCESOFFICEOFREGJ’JNALADMINISTRATORANDENVIRONMENTALCONTROLOFFICEOFTHE89KINGSHIGHWAYPHONE:(302)739-9000SECRETARYDOVER,DELAWARE19901FAX:(302)739-6242September24,2009Mr.WilliamC.Early(3RAOO)RFFJVEDActingRegionalAdministrator-U.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgencyOCT72I’9RegionII1650ArchStreetDvisic,-Philadelphia,PA19103IampleasedtosubmittheenclosedrevisiontotheStateofDelawareStateimplementationPlan(SIP)fortheAttainmentandMaintenanceoftheNationalAmbientAirQualityStandardsforOzoneandFineParticulateMatter.Therevisionisanamendmentto7DEAdmin.Code1146-ELECTRICGENERATINGUNIT(EGU)MULTI-POLLUTANTREGULATION.7DEAdmin.Code1146wasoriginallypromulgatedinNovember2006(thenRegulationNo.1146oftheStateofDelawareRegulationsGoverningtheControlofAirPollution)andwassubmittedtotheEPAasaSIPrevisiononNovember16,2006.ThisrevisionmodifiestheSO2massemissionslimitassociatedwithConectivEdgeMoorUnit5(asconstrainedin1146’sTable5-1)from2427tonsperyearto4600tonsperyear,beginningincalendaryear2009.Nootherchangesto1146havebeenmade,includingnochangetotheexistingrequirementforUnit5toburnonlylowsulfuroil.TheeffectivedateoftherevisionisOctober10,2009.TherequirementsoftheCAASection110(a)(2)(A)havebeenmetthroughthenormalpublichearingprocessestablishedbytheStateofDelawarewithpropernotification(30days)priortotheconveningofthepublichearing.TheaforementioneddocumentwasmadeavailableforpublicreviewandcommentbeginningonApril26,2009,andapublichearingwasheldonMay26,2009.AttachmentsAandBarecopiesofaffidavitsasproofofpropernotification.ItisthepositionoftheStateofDelawarethatallminimumrequirementssetforthinthe1990CleanAirActAmendmentshavebeenmet.Ve€4414ze47tai’aede4oafMr.WilliamC.EarlySeptember24,2009Page2WelookforwardtocontinuingthecooperativeeffortbetweenDelawareandEPAinthisimportantwork.Asalways,feelfreetocontactmeorAliMirzakhalili,Administrator,(302)739-9402,ifyouhaveanyquestionsconcerningtheencloseddocuments.Sincerely,CollinP.O’MaraSecretarycc:DianeEsher,EPAw/encl.AliMirzakhalili
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of WNC Housing Tax Credit Fund VI, L.P., Series 7 (the “Partnership”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), and pursuant to 18 U.S.C., section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Melanie R. Wenk, Vice President - Chief Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc., general partner of the Partnership, hereby certify that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.








Date:  October 4, 2010





/s/ MELANIE R. WENK


Melanie R. Wenk


Vice President-Chief Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.
# EUR-Lex - 12006E171 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12006E171

**Treaty establishing the European Community (consolidated version) - Part Three - Community policies - TITLE XVIII - Research and technological development - Article 171 **

*
Official Journal C 321 E , 29/12/2006 P. 0122 - 0122 Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0107 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0254 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0052 - Consolidated version *

Article 171

The Community may set up joint undertakings or any other structure necessary for the efficient execution of Community research, technological development and demonstration programmes.

--------------------------------------------------
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 03605

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2File Name3

Description

03605\03605_Certification Statement.PDF Plant certification statement

x 03605\03605_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

03605\03605_Completeness Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

x 03605\03605_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03605\03605_Part E.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03605\03605_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03605\Supporting Documents\03605_ Water Balance.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket. 

3

 No hardcopy log is included for this plant as no hardcopy materials were received.
#### § 38.13 Speed limits.

No person on Midway Atoll National Wildlife Refuge will exceed the speed limit for automobiles, trucks, bicycles, motorcycles, or other vehicles. Unless otherwise posted, the speed limit throughout the Midway Atoll National Wildlife Refuge is 15 miles per hour.
# EUR-Lex - 12006E086 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12006E086

**Treaty establishing the European Community (consolidated version) - Part Three - Community policies - TITLE VI - Common rules on competition, taxation and approximation of laws - Chapter 1 - Rules on competition - Section 1 - Rules applying to undertakings - Article 86 **

*
Official Journal C 321 E , 29/12/2006 P. 0076 - 0076 Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0066 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0210 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0029 - Consolidated version (EEC Treaty - no official publication available) *

Article 86

1. In the case of public undertakings and undertakings to which Member States grant special or exclusive rights, Member States shall neither enact nor maintain in force any measure contrary to the rules contained in this Treaty, in particular to those rules provided for in Article 12 and Articles 81 to 89.

2. Undertakings entrusted with the operation of services of general economic interest or having the character of a revenue-producing monopoly shall be subject to the rules contained in this Treaty, in particular to the rules on competition, in so far as the application of such rules does not obstruct the performance, in law or in fact, of the particular tasks assigned to them. The development of trade must not be affected to such an extent as would be contrary to the interests of the Community.

3. The Commission shall ensure the application of the provisions of this Article and shall, where necessary, address appropriate directives or decisions to Member States.

--------------------------------------------------
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

                     CONSENT OF T. J. SMITH & COMPANY, INC.

March 10, 2006

The Meridian Resource Corporation
1401 Enclave Parkway, Suite 300
Houston, Texas 77077

Re: Consent of Independent Petroleum Engineers

Gentlemen:

     We hereby consent to the references to our reviews dated February 3, 2004
and January 28, 2005, and February 7, 2006, which were used to prepare the
Estimated Future Reserves Attributable to Certain Leasehold Interests of The
Meridian Resource Corporation as of December 31, 2003, December 31, 2004 and
December 31, 2005, respectively, in your Form 10-K and to the reference to T. J.
Smith & Company, Inc. as experts in the field of petroleum engineering.

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-86788) pertaining to the Non-Employee Directors' Stock Option
Plan, 1990 Stock Option Plan, 1994 Executive Officer Warrants and 1993
Non-Employee Director Stock Options Plan and in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-40009) pertaining to The Texas Meridian Resources Corporation 1995
Long-Term Incentive Plan, The Texas Meridian Resources Corporation 1997
Long-Term Incentive Plan, Cairn Energy USA, Inc. 1993 Stock Option Plan, As
Amended, and Cairn Energy USA, Inc. Directors Stock Option Plan, As Amended, and
in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-83737) pertaining to The
Meridian Resource Corporation Geoscientist Well Bonus Plan and The Meridian
Resource Corporation Director Stock Option Plan, and in the Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-83735) pertaining to The Texas Meridian Resources
Corporation 1997 Long-Term Incentive Plan and The Texas Meridian Resources
Corporation Director Stock Option Plan of The Meridian Resource Corporation, and
in the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-41140) pertaining to The
Meridian Resource Corporation offering of up to $100,000,000 in Debt Securities,
Preferred Stock and Common Stock and in the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No.
333-75414) pertaining to The Meridian Resource Corporation offering of 1,940,991
shares of Common Stock and in the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No.
333-89620) pertaining to The Meridian Resource Corporation offering of
14,073,684 shares of Common Stock by selling security holders and in the
Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-116240) pertaining to The Meridian
Resource Corporation offering of up to $350,000,000 in Debt Securities,
Preferred Stock and Common Stock.

                                        Yours very truly,

                                        T. J. Smith & Company, Inc.


                                        /s/ T. J. Smith
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        By T.J. Smith
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-6611 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

BARRY EARL WILLIAMS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior

District Judge. (2:95-cr-00101-RGD; 2:97-cv-00840-RGD)

Submitted: August 31, 2006 Decided: September 7, 2006

Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Barry Earl Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Howard Jacob Zlotnick,

Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Barry Earl Williams seeks to appeal the district court’s

order dismissing a motion to amend his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000)

motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or

judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. §

2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue

absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this

standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that

any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court

is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. See Miller-El v.

Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S.

473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001).

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that

Williams has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED