alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APP EAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

RONALD PHILIPS, Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D15-338 NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC, Appellee. ________________________________/ Opinion filed March 24, 2016 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Marion County, Robert W. Hodges, Judge. Ronald Philips, Masaryktown, pro se. David W. Rodstein, of Padula Hodkin, PLLC, Boca Raton, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM Ronald Philips ("Appellant") appeals the trial court's entry of final judgment of foreclosure in favor of Nationstar Mortgage, LLC ("Nationstar") . Appellant raises several issues on appeal. We affirm as to all, except for the f inal judgment's inclusion of awards regarding specific expenses for which there was no proof . Appellant asserts that there was no evidence presented by Nationstar during the n on-jury trial to justify the inclusion of the amounts listed in the final judgment for hazar d insurance, property2 inspections, attorney’s fees, f iling fees, service fees, title search costs, and statutory mailing fees. Commendably, Nationstar concedes this point. We a gree that it was error to include those amounts in the final judgment. "[A]ppellate c ourts do not generally provide parties with an opportunity to retry their case upon a failure of proof." Wolkoff v. Am. Home Mortg. Servicing, Inc. , 153 So. 3d 280, 283 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014) (alteration in original) (quoting Correa v. U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n , 118 So. 2d 952, 956 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013)). Therefore, we affirm in part, reverse in part, and rem and with instructions for the trial court to enter an amended final judgment in favor of Nationstar, which shall exclude any amounts for hazard insurance, property inspections, attorney’s fees, filing fees, service fees, title search costs, and statutory mailing f ees, but will otherwise be in accordance with the original final judgment. AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, REMANDED WITH

INSTRUCTIONS

PALMER, TORPY, AND E DWARDS, JJ., concur.
KeyConcepts, LLC d/b/a Key-AerialGraphics

3229 East Friess Drive

Phoenix AZ 85032

PH: (602) 456-5404

FAX: (866) 771-7636

June 20, 2015

United States Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

West Building Ground Floor Room W12-140

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Response to request for additional information on Title 14 —> Chapter 1 —> 

Subchapter B —> Part 11 —> Subpart A —> 11.81 (Section d).

By granting KeyConcepts, LLC d/b/a Key-AerialGraphics a 333 exemption, the benefits to 

public interest include: 

• Reduced noise pollution compared to hiring a light piston or turbine helicopter. 

• Improved safety as as the sUAS will not need to be flown from an airport or base and 

therefore no overflight of populated areas putting risk to persons on the ground.

• Since the sUAS is unmanned there is no risk in the operation to the operator. 

• The market for aerial photography in the real estate industry will be made to a wider 

market, due to lower cost benefiting both the seller and buyer of said real estate. 

• When filming aerial images for marketing and promotion the public as a whole benefits 

from the increased safety & decreased operating expense.

• Providing increased business opportunities for clients by reducing expenses directly and 

indirectly. 

• If requested to participate in SAR operations and as coordinated by official air-boss of 

operations the public benefits by having registered controlled and coordinated manned fix 

wing, rotorcraft and unmanned sUAS resources allowing more potential to located 

subject and utilizing the best resource for each phase or grid of the coordinated SAR. 

The benefits to public interest are made both financially by reducing cost and/or adding 

resources and to safety by eliminating the need to use and aircraft in extreme close 

quarters where such operations would put risk to a manned rotorcraft, the crew and possibly 

even to those on the ground. 

KeyConcepts, LLC d/b/a Key-AerialGraphics recognizes that the public benefits most when 

tools and resources that meet special needs are utilized. As such we request this 

exemption so that we may add another tool and resource to our community along with the 

existing manned fixed wing and rotorcraft operations in the area. 
Our operation does not take the view of competing against manned operations, rather 

working in conjunction with to provide more options to the public where manned operations 

do not make the most sense due to price or safety concerns. 

Sincerely, 

Robyn Key

Owner/Operator 

KeyConcepts, LLC d/b/a Key-AerialGraphics
#### § 1194.2 Guidelines for Section 255 of the Communications Act.

The guidelines for telecommunications equipment and customer premises equipment covered by Section 255 of the Communications Act are set forth in Appendices B and C to this part.

[82 FR 5832, Jan. 18, 2017]
Case 16-28383 Doc 6 Filed 09/02/16 Entered 09/02/16 15:28:36 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2
Case 16-28383 Doc 6 Filed 09/02/16 Entered 09/02/16 15:28:36 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2
From: Raj Rao/RTP/USEPA/US 

To: "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov> 

Date: 08/09/2010 05:49 PM 

Subject: Final SIP Files 

 

GHG SIP Call Proposal_8-9-2010 to OMB’s RLSO.doc GHG SIP Call Proposal_8-9-2010.doc 

FIP Files will follow 

Raj Rao, P.E. 

Group Leader, NSRG 

OAQPS/AQPD(MD- C504-03) 

109 TW Alexander Drive 

RTP, NC 27709 

919-541-5344 

919-541-5509 fax 

Note: Positions or views expressed here do not represent official EPA policy. Interagency deliberative 

and Confidential.
# EUR-Lex - 12004V167 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V167

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART III — THE POLICIES AND FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - TITLE III — INTERNAL POLICIES AND ACTION - CHAPTER I — INTERNAL MARKET - Section 5 — Rules on competition - Subsection 2 — Aids granted by Member States - Article III-167 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0071 - 0072 *

Article III-167

1. Save as otherwise provided in the Constitution, any aid granted by a Member State or through State resources in any form whatsoever which distorts or threatens to distort competition by favouring certain undertakings or the production of certain goods shall, insofar as it affects trade between Member States, be incompatible with the internal market.

2. The following shall be compatible with the internal market:

(a) aid having a social character, granted to individual consumers, provided that such aid is granted without discrimination related to the origin of the products concerned;

(b) aid to make good the damage caused by natural disasters or exceptional occurrences;

(c) aid granted to the economy of certain areas of the Federal Republic of Germany affected by the division of Germany, insofar as such aid is required in order to compensate for the economic disadvantages caused by that division. Five years after the entry into force of the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe, the Council, acting on a proposal from the Commission, may adopt a European decision repealing this point.

3. The following may be considered to be compatible with the internal market:

(a) aid to promote the economic development of areas where the standard of living is abnormally low or where there is serious underemployment, and of the regions referred to in Article III-424, in view of their structural, economic and social situation;

(b) aid to promote the execution of an important project of common European interest or to remedy a serious disturbance in the economy of a Member State;

(c) aid to facilitate the development of certain economic activities or of certain economic areas, where such aid does not adversely affect trading conditions to an extent contrary to the common interest;

(d) aid to promote culture and heritage conservation where such aid does not affect trading conditions and competition in the Union to an extent that is contrary to the common interest;

(e) such other categories of aid as may be specified by European regulations or decisions adopted by the Council on a proposal from the Commission.

--------------------------------------------------
§ 217.290 Specified activity and specified geographical region. ( a ) Regulations in this subpart apply to activities associated with the Coastal Virginia Offshore Wind Commercial Project (hereafter referred to as the “Project”) by the Virginia Electric and Power Company, doing business as Dominion Energy Virginia (hereafter referred to as “LOA Holder”), and those persons it authorizes or funds to conduct activities on its behalf in the area outlined in paragraph (b) of this section. Requirements imposed on the LOA Holder must be implemented by those persons it authorizes or funds to conduct activities on its behalf.
( b ) The specified geographical region is the Mid-Atlantic Bight, which includes, but is not limited to, the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) Lease Area Outer Continental Shelf (OCS)-A 0483 Commercial Lease of Submerged Lands for Renewable Energy Development, one export cable route, and one sea-to-shore transition point located at the State Military Reservation in Virginia Beach, Virginia.
( c ) The specified activities are vibratory and impact pile driving of wind turbine generator (WTGs) and offshore substation (OSSs) foundations; vibratory pile driving (install and subsequently removal) of cofferdams; impact pile driving (install and subsequently removal) of goal posts; fishery and ecological monitoring surveys; placement of scour protection; trenching, laying, and burial activities associated with the installation of the export cable from OSSs to shore-based converter stations and inter-array cables between turbines; high-resolution geophysical (HRG) site characterization surveys; vessel transit within the specified geographical region to transport crew, supplies, and materials; and WTG operation.
Your session is about to expire.Resume session

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Welcome.Log inorregisterCOPS OFFICE RESOURCE CENTER

HomeCatalogCartOrders

                    

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                CatalogMatches: 1Offline form Recent Popular Online Print OtherCOPS-P034Assessing Responses to Problems: An Introductory Guide for Police Problem-Solvers POP GuideThis problem-solving tool summarizes knowledge about information gathering and analysis techniques that might assist police at any of the four main stages of a problem-oriented project: scanning, analysis, response and assessment. Extensive technical and scientific literature covers each technique addressed in the guide.By John E. EckCategories: Data and Analysis • Foundations of Community Policing • POP Center ResourceLanguage: EnglishLow stockPublic linkhttps://portal.cops.usdoj.gov/resourcecenter?item=cops-p034Click here to see the entire catalog.Cart:Download PDFPamphlet • Oct 2013Search catalogreset title abstract authors contentContaining text: exact phraseNot containing text: exact phraseLanguage:anyEnglishSpanishHmongVietnameseCategory:anyAlternatives to IncarcerationCommunity PartnershipsData and AnalysisEthics and IntegrityFoundations of Community PolicingHiring, Recruitment, and RetentionHomeland SecurityNew Immigrant CommunitiesNonviolent CrimeOtherPolice OperationsPOP Center ResourceSchool and Campus SafetyTechnologyTribalViolent CrimeYouth SafetyPublished after:Published before:Page1

                    

FOIA | No FEAR Act | Open Government | Privacy | Legal|HelpCopyright (C) U.S. Department of Justice, COPS Office, IT Division, 2012 - 2024. All rights reserved.
Rendered on Mon Mar 4 2024 at 02:32 (UTC-5) in 0.19 secEnterprise Framework 3.21.7.7 • Store Controls 3.3.1.7Survey 500303407 Section 60000560 Rules Hints Inactive
#### REGINA MANSBACH, Respondent, *v.*THE METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant.

*An action lies against an insurance■ company to ham a policy canceled by it, reinstated.*

Appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, entered upon the trial of this action by the court without a jury.

This action was brought to compel the defendant to reinstate an endowment policy taken out and hold by the plaintiff on the life of her husband, and to receive the stipulated premiums thereon. The defendant had canceled the policy and declared the same void, on the ground of certain alleged fraudulent representations contained in the application therefor. The court below found that no fraudulent representations were made in the application for the policy.

The court at General Term said: “In *Cohen*v. *New York Mutual Insurance Company*(50 N. Y., 610) it was substantially held that an action of this nature could be maintained, for the purpose of restoring a policy of insurance repudiated by the defendant. So far as the meritorious rights of the parties in such a case as that are concerned, the decision has been overruled, we have no doubt correctly, by the Supreme Court of the United States, but it is still the law of the courts of this State, and is not affected by the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States, so far as relates to the right to maintain such an action.”

*William II. Arnoux,*for the appellant. ■ *C. Strauss,*for the respondent.

Opinion by

Davis, P. J. ;

Brady and Ingalls, JJ., concurred.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
# EUR-Lex - 12005SA018 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12005SA018

**Act concerning the conditions of accession of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania and the adjustments to the Treaties on which the European Union is founded - PART TWO:ADJUSTMENTS TO THE TREATIES - TITLE II:OTHER ADJUSTMENTS - Article 18 **

*
Official Journal L 157 , 21/06/2005 P. 0210 - 0210 *

Article 18

1. The second paragraph of Article 314 of the EC Treaty shall be replaced by the following:

"Pursuant to the Accession Treaties, the Bulgarian, Czech, Danish, English, Estonian, Finnish, Greek, Hungarian, Irish, Latvian, Lithuanian, Maltese, Polish, Portuguese, Romanian, Slovak, Slovenian, Spanish and Swedish versions of this Treaty shall also be authentic."

2. The second paragraph of Article 225 of the EAEC Treaty shall be replaced by the following:

"Pursuant to the Accession Treaties, the Bulgarian, Czech, Danish, English, Estonian, Finnish, Greek, Hungarian, Irish, Latvian, Lithuanian, Maltese, Polish, Portuguese, Romanian, Slovak, Slovenian, Spanish and Swedish versions of this Treaty shall also be authentic."

3. The second paragraph of Article 53 of the EU Treaty shall be replaced by the following:

"Pursuant to the Accession Treaties, the Bulgarian, Czech, Estonian, Finnish, Hungarian, Latvian, Lithuanian, Maltese, Polish, Romanian, Slovak, Slovenian and Swedish versions of this Treaty shall also be authentic."

--------------------------------------------------
Document

Exhibit 10.19(b)




SECOND AMENDMENT


SEAGATE DEFERRED COMPENSATION SUB-PLAN


The Seagate Deferred Compensation Sub-Plan, as amended and restated as of January 1, 2010 (the “Plan”), is hereby amended by this Second Amendment (the “Amendment”).


WHEREAS, for purposes of this Amendment, capitalized terms used herein that are not defined shall have the meanings given to them in the Plan;


WHEREAS, Seagate US LLC (the “Company”) maintains the Plan, which is a nonqualified deferred compensation plan, for the benefit of eligible employees of the Company and Participating Companies; 


WHEREAS, Section 10.4 of the Plan document provides that the Seagate Benefits Administrative Committee (the “Committee”) has the authority to adopt and execute any amendments to the Plan; and


WHEREAS, pursuant to authority granted to the Committee under Section 10.4, the Committee has determined that it is appropriate to amend the Plan to eliminate the requirement that the Company and each Participating Company must make quarterly contributions to the Trust Fund. 


NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Amendment, as set forth in the attached Exhibit A, is hereby approved and adopted effective as specified in Exhibit A.  












Exhibit A


SECOND AMENDMENT


SEAGATE DEFERRED COMPENSATION SUB-PLAN


The Seagate Deferred Compensation Sub-Plan, as amended and restated as of January 1, 2010 (the “Plan”), is hereby amended as follows:


1.Effective July 31, 2020, Section 6.2 of the Plan is hereby deleted and the remaining subsections of Article VI are renumbered accordingly.


2.In all respects not amended, the Plan is hereby ratified and confirmed.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Seagate Benefits Administrative Committee, by its duly authorized delegate, has executed this Amendment to the Plan on July 30, 2020.  




									
			/s/ Janet Farabaugh

	By:	 	Janet Farabaugh
	Title:	 	Senior Director, Global Benefits
Document

Exhibit 10.1



NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION PACKAGE


For service in 2020, GreenSky, Inc. (the “Company”) shall pay each non-employee director who is independent in accordance with the Nasdaq Stock Market and Securities and Exchange Commission rules governing director independence the following for service to the Company:


									
	Annual Cash Retainer  		$60,000
	Annual Equity Award 		  $200,000 in shares of restricted Class A common stock, vesting in full on the one year anniversary of the date of grant
	Additional Cash Retainer for Audit Committee Chair		$15,000
	Additional Cash Retainer for Compensation Committee Chair		$12,500
	Additional Cash Retainer for Governance and Nominating Committee Chair		$9,000
	Board Meeting Fees		None






The Company also will reimburse all directors for travel and other necessary business expenses incurred in the performance of director services and extend coverage to them under the Company’s directors’ and officers’ indemnity insurance policy.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 5291 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 5291

    To require all aliens applying for a nonimmigrant visa who are 
   unlawfully present in the United States to submit to an in person 
                   interview with a consular officer.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 25, 2024

 Mr. Cornyn (for himself, Mr. Tillis, Mr. Cruz, Mr. Risch, Mr. Crapo, 
   Mr. Budd, Mr. Sullivan, Mr. Daines, Mrs. Britt, Mr. Hagerty, Mr. 
Ricketts, Mr. Lankford, Mr. Tuberville, and Mrs. Blackburn) introduced 
the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 
                            on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To require all aliens applying for a nonimmigrant visa who are 
   unlawfully present in the United States to submit to an in person 
                   interview with a consular officer.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Visa Integrity Preservation Act of 
2024''.

SEC. 2. IN PERSON INTERVIEW WITH CONSULAR OFFICER REQUIREMENT FOR 
              ALIENS WHO ARE UNLAWFULLY PRESENT IN THE UNITED STATES.

    Section 222(h)(2) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 
1202(h)(2)) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (E)(iv), by striking ``or'' at the end;
            (2) in subparagraph (F)(iii), by striking the period at the 
        end and inserting ``; or''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(G) is inadmissible under paragraph (6) or (9) of 
                section 212(a).''.
                                 <all>
```
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 5178 

To amend title II of the Social Security Act to update the amount of 

Social Security lump sum death payments and index lump sum death 

payments to inflation. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 25, 2024 

Mr. WELCH (for himself, Ms. WARREN, and Mr. SANDERS) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title II of the Social Security Act to update 

the amount of Social Security lump sum death payments 

and index lump sum death payments to inflation. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Social Security Sur5 vivor Benefits Equity Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. UPDATING AND INDEXING THE AMOUNT OF THE SO7 CIAL SECURITY LUMP SUM DEATH PAYMENT. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 202(i) of the Social Secu9 rity Act (42 U.S.C. 402(i)) is amended, in the matter preVerDate Sep 11 2014 02:05 Oct 09, 2024 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S5178.IS S5178

kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 5178 IS

1 ceding paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘three times’’ and all 

2 that follows through ‘‘smaller,’’ and inserting ‘‘$2,900 (or, 

3 in the case of such an insured individual who dies in a 

4 calendar year after 2025, an amount equal to $2,900 in5 creased by the percentage increase in the Consumer Price 

6 Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers for 

7 the period that begins with October 2024 and ends with 

8 October of the calendar year preceding the calendar year 

9 involved and rounded to the nearest multiple of $10)’’. 

10 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

11 this section shall take effect on January 1, 2025, and shall 

12 apply to lump sum death payments payable under section 

13 202(i) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 402(i)) with 

14 respect to individuals who die on or after such date. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB