alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EUR-Lex - 12003TN07/06 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12003TN07/06

**Act concerning the conditions of accession of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia and the Slovak Republic and the adjustments to the Treaties on which the European Union is founded - Annex VII: List referred to in Article 24 of the Act of Accession: Cyprus - 6. Transport policy **

*
Official Journal L 236 , 23/09/2003 P. 0820 - 0820 *

6. TRANSPORT POLICY

31985 R 3821: Council Regulation (EEC) No 3821/85 of 20 December 1985 on recording equipment in road transport (OJ L 370, 31.12.1985, p. 8), as last amended by:

- 32002 R 1360: Commission Regulation (EC) No 1360/2002 of 13.6.2002 (OJ L 207, 5.8.2002, p. 1).

By way of derogation from Article 3(1) of Regulation (EEC) No 3821/85, the requirement of installation and use of recording equipment in vehicles registered for the carriage of passengers or goods by road shall not apply to Cyprus until 31 December 2005 regarding vehicles registered before 1 January 2002 and engaged exclusively in domestic transport operations. Drivers of such vehicles shall record their driving times and rest periods using a personal log book.

--------------------------------------------------
[4910-13-PI 

### DEPARTMENT OF TR •..••• SPORTA nON Federal Aviation AdmiaistratioD 14CFR Part 39 

# 11/5 I IDocket No. FAA-2016-**H*; Directorate Identifier 201O-NM~09I·ADI I 

### RJN 2I2o-AA64 Airn"orthiness Directives; Airbus Model A) I0 Series Airplanes AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. 

### ACTION: Notice of proposed ",Icmaking 

### (NPRfl. ." SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD, for the product 

### listed above. This proposed AD results frommandatory continuing airworthiness information 

### (MeAl) originated 

### by an aviation 

### authority of another 

### coulllry to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The 

### MeAl describes the unsati condition as: DGAC 

## IDirection Genera\e de 

# rAviatiQo CiviJej Fram:::eAirworthiness Directive (AD) 1992-1 06-132(B) •• III}Vas issued to require a set or inspection- and modi.fication tasks which addressed 

### JARJFAR lJoint Aviation Regulation! Federal Aviation Regulation] 25-571 requirements related 10damage-tolerance and fatigue evaluation of structure .•• *. 

### The unsafe condition isreduced structural integrity ofthe wings. The proposed AD would require actions that are intended to address the unsafe condition described in lho::: MeAl.

FAA Form 1360-14.1 (6.89) OFFICIAl RLE copy 1l.u,s. GO\Il:RN/oENT PRlNTI ••r:;OFFICE: H,9~· 'lI'£I.211
Amendment to Securities Agreement


    Exhibit
      10.3

     

    AMENDMENT
      TO SECURITIES 

    PURCHASE
      AGREEMENT

    (“Amendment”)

    


    


    THE
      PARTIES AGREE THAT the Securities Purchase Agreement dated March 12, 2007,
      by
      and between the Company and Purchaser is amended to add the following language
      to paragraph 2.2:

    (iv)
      the
      Common Stock Purchase Warrant duly executed by
      the
      Company in the Form of Exhibit D, attached hereto. 

    


    
      
        

      

    

    


    


    
      	BULLION
              RIVER GOLD CORP. INC.	
              Address
                for Notice:

            


    

       

    3500
      Lakeside Court, Suite 200

    Reno,
      Nevada 89509

    (775)
      324-4881

    By:
      /s/
      Peter Kuhn

     

    Peter
      Kuhn,

    President

    


    


    ELTON
      PARTICIPATION CORPORATION

    


    Signature
      of Authorized Representative:
      /s/
      Peter-Paul Stengel

    Name
      of
      Authorized Signatory: Peter-Paul Stengel

    Title
      of
      Authorized Signatory: President

    Email
      Address of
      Purchaser:_________________________________________________________

     

    Address
      for Notice of
      Purchaser:______________________________________________________

    ____________________________________________________________________________________________

     

    Address
      for Delivery of Securities for Purchaser (if not same as
      above):_________________________

    ____________________________________________________________________________________________

     

    Principal
      Amount: $1,000,000.00

     

    Warrant
      Shares: 

     

    1
###### Editorial Note on [Part 1926](/current/title-29/part-1926?toc=1)

#### Editorial Notes:

1. At [44 FR 8577](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/44-FR-8577), Feb. 9, 1979, and corrected at [44 FR 20940](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/44-FR-20940), Apr. 6, 1979, OSHA reprinted without change the entire text of [29 CFR part 1926](/on/2024-09-23/title-29/part-1926) together with certain General Industry Occupational Safety and Health Standards contained in [29 CFR part 1910](/on/2024-09-23/title-29/part-1910), which have been identified as also applicable to construction work. This republication developed a single set of OSHA regulations for both labor and management forces within the construction industry.

2. Nomenclature changes to part 1926 appear at [84 FR 21597](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/84-FR-21597), May 14, 2019.

#### § 1926.1104 alpha-Naphthylamine.

Note:

The requirements applicable to construction work under this section are identical to those set forth at [§ 1910.1003 of this chapter](/on/2024-09-23/title-29/section-1910.1003).

[[61 FR 31433](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/61-FR-31433), June 20, 1996]
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit 

___________________________

No. 21-2822

___________________________

 

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee

v.

Leslie Aranda-Moreno

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Northern District of Iowa - Western

____________

Submitted: December 28, 2021

Filed: January 6, 2022

[Unpublished]

____________

 

Before LOKEN, SHEPHERD, and STRAS, Circuit Judges. 

____________

 

PER CURIAM.

Leslie Aranda-Moreno pleaded guilty to conspiring to distribute 

methamphetamine. See 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(A), 846. As part of the 

plea agreement, she waived the right to appeal her conviction and sentence, except 

for certain circumstances that are absent here. In an Anders brief, Aranda-Moreno’s 
-2- 

counsel suggests that the district court1 erred when it found that she was ineligible

for relief under the so-called “safety valve.” See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 

(1967); see also 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f). 

Upon careful review, we conclude that the waiver is both enforceable and 

applicable to the issue raised on appeal. See United States v. Scott, 627 F.3d 702, 

704 (8th Cir. 2010) (reviewing the validity of an appeal waiver de novo); United 

States v. Andis, 333 F.3d 886, 889-92 (8th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (explaining that an 

appeal waiver will be enforced if the appeal falls within the scope of the waiver, the 

defendant knowingly and voluntarily entered into the plea agreement and the waiver, 

and enforcing the waiver would not result in a miscarriage of justice). We have also 

independently reviewed the record and conclude that no other non-frivolous issues 

exist. See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 82-83 (1988). Accordingly, we dismiss the 

appeal and grant counsel permission to withdraw.

______________________________

1

The Honorable Leonard T. Strand, Chief Judge, United States District Court 

for the Northern District of Iowa.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5237 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5237

To amend title 31, United States Code, to close appropriation accounts 
                  available for an indefinite period.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 7, 1994

 Mr. Santorum introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on Government Operations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 31, United States Code, to close appropriation accounts 
                  available for an indefinite period.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CLOSING OF APPROPRIATION ACCOUNTS AVAILABLE FOR INDEFINITE 
              PERIODS.

    Section 1555 of title 31, United States Code, is amended to read as 
follows:
``Sec. 1555. Closing of appropriation accounts available for indefinite 
              periods
    ``An appropriation account available for obligation for an 
indefinite period shall be closed, and any remaining balance (whether 
obligated or unobligated) in that account shall be canceled and 
thereafter shall not be available for obligation or expenditure for any 
purpose, if no disbursement has been made against the appropriation for 
two consecutive years, unless--
            ``(1) the head of the agency concerned or the President 
        submits a recommendation to the Congress that the account 
        remain available for obligation; and
            ``(2) the availability of the account is extended by a law 
        enacted after the date of the submission of that recommendation 
        to the Congress.''.
                                 <all>
```
-79 -78 -77 -76 -75

 38

 39

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★

▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 500

18 12 06 00

09/05

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 05 Sep 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.03 N 77.49 W Meters AGL
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. SS. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Innovative Software Technologies, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Christopher J. Floyd, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

      (1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.


/s/ Christopher J. Floyd
------------------------
Christopher J. Floyd
Chief Financial Officer
August 23, 2004
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
Required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350  (as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ DARIN DIVINIADarin DiviniaChief Executive Officer and President
(Principal Executive Officer and 
Principal Financial Officer)
# EUR-Lex - 12004V282 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V282

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART III — THE POLICIES AND FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - TITLE III — INTERNAL POLICIES AND ACTION - CHAPTER V — AREAS WHERE THE UNION MAY TAKE SUPPORTING, COORDINATING OR COMPLEMENTARY ACTION - Section 5 — Education, youth, sport and vocational training - Article III-282 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0127 - 0127 *

Article III-282

1. The Union shall contribute to the development of quality education by encouraging cooperation between Member States and, if necessary, by supporting and complementing their action. It shall fully respect the responsibility of the Member States for the content of teaching and the organisation of education systems and their cultural and linguistic diversity.

The Union shall contribute to the promotion of European sporting issues, while taking account of the specific nature of sport, its structures based on voluntary activity and its social and educational function.

Union action shall be aimed at:

(a) developing the European dimension in education, particularly through the teaching and dissemination of the languages of the Member States;

(b) encouraging mobility of students and teachers, inter alia by encouraging the academic recognition of diplomas and periods of study;

(c) promoting cooperation between educational establishments;

(d) developing exchanges of information and experience on issues common to the education systems of the Member States;

(e) encouraging the development of youth exchanges and of exchanges of socio-educational instructors and encouraging the participation of young people in democratic life in Europe;

(f) encouraging the development of distance education;

(g) developing the European dimension in sport, by promoting fairness and openness in sporting competitions and cooperation between bodies responsible for sports, and by protecting the physical and moral integrity of sportsmen and sportswomen, especially young sportsmen and sportswomen.

2. The Union and the Member States shall foster cooperation with third countries and the competent international organisations in the field of education and sport, in particular the Council of Europe.

3. In order to contribute to the achievement of the objectives referred to in this Article:

(a) European laws or framework laws shall establish incentive measures, excluding any harmonisation of the laws and regulations of the Member States. They shall be adopted after consultation of the Committee of the Regions and the Economic and Social Committee;

(b) the Council, on a proposal from the Commission, shall adopt recommendations.

--------------------------------------------------
§ 84.21 How do I apply for a National Coastal Wetlands Conservation Grant? ( a ) Eligible applicants should submit their proposals to the appropriate Regional Director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Proposals must be complete upon submission, and must include the information outlined in § 84.22 to be complete. ( 1 ) Service Regional Wildlife and Sport Fish Restoration Offices' responsibilities for administration of this grant program include: Notifying the States of the program, its requirements, and any changes that occur; determining the State agencies designated by the Governor as eligible applicants; ensuring that only eligible applicants apply for grants; coordinating with various Service programs to ensure that sound and consistent guidance is communicated to the States; determining proposal eligibility and substantiality; and determining 75 percent match eligibility and notifying the States of approved and disapproved proposals.
( 2 ) Service Divisions of Ecological Services in the regions and field and Fisheries and Habitat Conservation in the national office provide technical assistance and work with Wildlife and Sport Fish Restoration to encourage State participation in this process.
( 3 ) Send your proposal to “Regional Director (Attention: Wildlife and Sport Fish Restoration)” at the address of the appropriate regional office, as provided at 50 CFR 2.2.
( b ) The Program operates on an annual cycle. Regional Wildlife and Sport Fish Restoration Offices request proposals from the States in early April. Proposals must be received by the Regional Director on or before a due date set in early June in order to be considered for funding in the following fiscal year. Check with your Regional Office each year for the exact due dates. Regions review proposals for eligibility and substantiality. Regions may rank eligible and substantial proposals and submit them to the national office of the Service in Washington, DC, by a date set in late June. A Review Panel coordinated by the Service's National Office of Fisheries and Habitat Conservation reviews and ranks proposals in early August using the criteria established in this rule. The Director selects the proposals and announces the grant recipients at the beginning of the new fiscal year (October 1).
( c ) More than one agency in a State may submit proposals to the Service if the Governor determines that more than one agency has responsibility for coastal wetlands.
( d ) A project proposal that includes several separate and distinct phases may be submitted in phases, but any succeeding phases must compete against other proposals in the year submitted. Obtaining money for one phase of a project will not be contingent upon acquiring money for another phase of that same project.
( e ) The Federal (Program) share will not exceed $1 million per project.
( f ) The percentage of non-Federal match (cash or in-kind) must not be less than 25 percent of the total costs if the State has a designated fund or not less than 50 percent without a fund.
[67 FR 49267, July 30, 2002, as amended at 78 FR 35152, June 12, 2013]
#### § 301.75-17 Funds for the replacement of certified citrus nursery stock.

Subject to the availability of appropriated funds, a commercial citrus nursery may be eligible to receive funds to replace certified citrus nursery stock in accordance with the provisions of this section.

(a) *Eligibility.* A commercial citrus nursery may be eligible to receive funds to replace certified citrus nursery stock removed to control citrus canker if the nursery stock was removed pursuant to a public order after September 30, 2001, and before January 10, 2006.

(b) *Certified citrus nursery stock payments.* A commercial citrus nursery that is eligible under [paragraph (a)](/on/2024-09-20/title-7/section-301.75-17#p-301.75-17(a)) of this section to receive funds to replace certified citrus nursery stock will, upon approval of an application submitted in accordance with [paragraph (c)](/on/2024-09-20/title-7/section-301.75-17#p-301.75-17(c)) of this section, receive a payment calculated using the following rates:

| Type of certified nursery stock | Payment (dollars) |
| --- | --- |
| Seedlings | 0.18/plant. |
| Liners or rootstock | 1.50/plant. |
| Budded field grown citrus plants | 4.00/plant. |
| Budded container/greenhouse citrus plants | 4.50/plant. |
| Citrus nursery stock in containers for wholesale or retail sale: | |
| 1 gallon | 5.00/container. |
| 3 gallon | 10.00/container. |
| 5 gallon | 15.00/container. |
| 7 gallon | 20.00/container. |
| Larger than 7 gallon | 26.00/container. |

(c) *How to apply for certified nursery stock replacement funds.* The form necessary to apply for funds to replace certified nursery stock may be obtained from any local citrus canker eradication program office in Florida, or from the USDA Citrus Canker Eradication Program, 6901 West Sunrise Boulevard, Plantation, FL 33313. The completed application should be accompanied by a copy of the public order directing the destruction of the trees and its accompanying inventory that describes the number and type of the certified nursery stock removed. If the certified nursery stock was planted in pots, the inventory should specify the size of the container. If the certified nursery stock was bare root plants or in a temporary container, the inventory should specify whether the plant was non-budded or budded. The completed application must be sent to the USDA Citrus Canker Eradication Program, Attn: Commercial Compensation, 10300 Sunset Dr., Suite 150, Miami, FL 33173. Claims for certified nursery stock must be received by August 7, 2006.

[[71 FR 33172](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/71-FR-33172), June 8, 2006]
Exhibit 32


SOUTHCOAST FINANCIAL CORPORATION
 CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350








The undersigned, who are the chief executive officer and the chief financial officer of Southcoast Financial Corporation, each hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge, the accompanying Form 10-Q of the registrant fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.











Date:           August 10, 2012

/s/ L. Wayne PearsonL. Wayne PearsonChief Executive Officer








/s/ William C. HeslopWilliam C. HeslopChief Financial Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-40726

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JOSE ARMANDO BAZAN,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:17-CR-691-1

Before DAVIS, JONES, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Jose Armando Bazan has moved for 

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 

386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). 

Bazan has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the 

relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s 

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

May 2, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 18-40726 Document: 00514940712 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/02/2019
No. 18-40726

2

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is 

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 18-40726 Document: 00514940712 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/02/2019
Operation Description 

(see page 2 for details) 
Details 

1. 

customers' Sites. Based on.current 

-~~~~~~~- is sold to-customers. on 

kg/year or approximate~ gallons/year in ••• I!IIIIJiiil····· 

11. Release 1 is based on washing the blend tank after blending. In practice this may 

not be done at some customers as they will follow with ano1her batch of soluble oil of a 

different composition Without washing between batches. The -release is based on a 2% 

yield loss for batch containingll% of the new subStance. 

111. Release 2 essentially nit Material from cleaning of drum hoses is 

included 

rv. take place at 

v. 

programs and ultimately 

v1. mostcommonmethod-ofdisposal of is acid/alum 

splitting ofthe fluid' into its oil and water orgamcs water soluble 

-wiU partition to the oil phase. The oil phase is transported to off site reclamation and 

either _re.,.refmed or incinerated for fuel value. The-are normally removed from the 

water phase utilizing flocculating agents and disposed of in a similar rnarmer. Very large 

•••• c:enters.may have their own on.:.site bio-pond and waste treatment system