alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EUR-Lex - 12002E091 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 12002E091

**Treaty establishing the European Community (Nice consolidated version) - Part Three: Community policies - Title VI: Common rules on competition, taxation and approximation of laws - Chapter 2: Tax provisions - Article 91 - Article 96 - EC Treaty (Maastricht consolidated version) - Article 96 - EEC Treaty **

*
Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0068 - 0068 Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0213 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0031 - Consolidated version (EEC Treaty - no official publication available) *

Treaty establishing the European Community (Nice consolidated version)

Part Three: Community policies

Title VI: Common rules on competition, taxation and approximation of laws

Chapter 2: Tax provisions

Article 91

Article 96 - EC Treaty (Maastricht consolidated version)

Article 96 - EEC Treaty

Article 91

Where products are exported to the territory of any Member State, any repayment of internal taxation shall not exceed the internal taxation imposed on them whether directly or indirectly.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          12,225
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   24,266
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,881)
<INVENTORY>                                     15,817
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                57,304
<PP&E>                                          43,101
<DEPRECIATION>                                (20,147)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 132,220
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           54,701
<BONDS>                                         20,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           161
<OTHER-SE>                                      26,244
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   132,220
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               255,893
<CGS>                                          201,478
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  229,027
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,325
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 23,541
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (29,067)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             52,608
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (1,315)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    51,293
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.18


</TABLE>
#### § 80.39 What must an agency do if it becomes aware of errors in its certified license data?

A State fish and wildlife agency must submit revised certified data on paid license holders within 90 days after the agency becomes aware of errors in its certified data. The State may become ineligible to participate in the benefits of the relevant Act if it becomes aware of errors in its certified data and does not resubmit accurate certified data within 90 days.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-6068
WAYNE BREWTON, Petitioner - Appellant, versus WARDEN, MARYLAND CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, J; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA97-1308-PJM) Submitted: May 14, 1998 Decided: June 2, 1998 Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mark Lawrence Gitomer, CARDIN & GITOMER, P.A., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, AnnabelleLouise Lisic, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate ofappealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Brewton v. Warden , No. CA-97-1308-PJM (D. Md. Dec. 1, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
From: Ekaterina Grimes

To: Finamore, Robert (OST)

Cc: gpwicks@wicks-group.com

Subject: Arctic Sunwest Charters

Date: Wednesday, February 06, 2013 2:42:49 PM

Dear Bob:

On behalf of 8199400 Canada Inc., dba Arctic Sunwest Charters (“Arctic Sunwest Charters”), this is to

confirm that Arctic Sunwest Charters does not operate aircraft “designed to have a maximum

passenger capacity of not more than 60 seats or a maximum payload capacity of not more than

18,000 pounds,” and is thus exempt from the requirements of 14 CFR Part 243 and 49 USC section

41313.

Based on this confirmation, we respectfully request that Arctic Sunwest Charters’ application for a

foreign air carrier permit and an exemption currently pending in docket DOT-OST-2012-0219 be

processed without the submissions of the passenger manifest procedures and the family assistance

plan that are the subject of the above-referenced regulatory requirements.

Sincerely,

Ekaterina A. Grimes

Consultant for Arctic Sunwest Charters

Partner, Executive VP

The Wicks Group PLLC

1215 17th Street, NW

Sumner Square, 4th Floor

Washington, DC 20036

Tel: 202-457-7790

Fax: 202-457-7799

Mobile: 202-352-3983
§ 85.48 Compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and policies. ( a ) In accepting Federal funds, State representatives must agree to and certify compliance with all applicable Federal laws, regulations, and policies. This is done by submitting an assurances statement that describes the compliance requirements for Federal grants.
( b ) Compliance with environmental and other laws, as defined in Service Manual 523 FW Chapter 1, may require additional documentation. Consult with Regional Offices for specific applicability.
( c ) For method of payment, refer to 43 CFR part 12, 31 CFR part 205, and any other regulations referenced in these parts.
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C.

 

 March 11, 2024 

VIA EMAIL

cspies@dickinsonwright.com

kreynolds@dickinsonwright.com 

Charles Spies and Katie Reynolds

Dickinson Wright PLLC

1825 Eye St. NW, Ste. 900 

Washington, DC 20006 

 RE: MUR 8082 

 Unknown Respondents, et al.

 

Dear Mr. Spies and Ms. Reynolds: 

On November 3, 2022, the Federal Election Commission notified your client South 

Florida Residents First and Paul Kilgore in his official capacity as treasurer (“the Committee”) of 

a complaint alleging that the Committee may have violated certain sections of the Federal 

Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended (the “Act”). 

On February 27, 2024, the Commission voted to close its file in this matter. Documents 

related to the case will be placed on the public record within 30 days. See Disclosure of Certain 

Documents in Enforcement and Other Matters, 81 Fed. Reg. 50,702 (Aug. 2, 2016). 

 If you have any questions, please contact me at (202) 694-1688 or mlupo@fec.gov. 

 Sincerely,

 

 Matthew Lupo

Attorney 

 

MUR808200499
#### § 175.130 Visual distress signals accepted.

(a) Any of the following signals, when carried in the number required, can be used to meet the requirements of [§ 175.110](/on/2024-09-23/title-33/section-175.110):

(1) An electric distress light meeting the standards of [46 CFR 161.013](/on/2024-09-23/title-46/section-161.013). One is required to meet the night only requirement.

(2) An orange flag meeting the standards of [46 CFR 160.072](/on/2024-09-23/title-46/section-160.072). One is required to meet the day only requirement.

(3) Pyrotechnics meeting the standards noted in Table [175.130](/on/2024-09-23/title-33/section-175.130).

(b) Any combination of signal devices selected from the types noted in [paragraphs (a) (1)](/on/2024-09-23/title-33/section-175.130#p-175.130(a)(1)), [(2)](/on/2024-09-23/title-33/section-175.130#p-175.130(a)(2)) and [(3)](/on/2024-09-23/title-33/section-175.130#p-175.130(a)(3)) of this section, when carried in the number required, may be used to meet both day and night requirements. *Examples*—the combination of two hand held red flares (160.021), and one parachute red flare (160.024 or 160.036) meets both day and night requirements. Three hand held orange smoke (160.037) with one electric distress light (161.013) meet both day and night requirements.

Table [175.130](/on/2024-09-23/title-33/section-175.130)—Pyrotechnic Signal Devices

| Approval number under 46 CFR | Device description | Meets requirement for | Number required |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 160.021 | Hand Held Red Flare Distress Signals3 | Day and Night | 3 |
| 160.022 | Floating Orange Smoke Distress Signals | Day Only | 3 |
| 160.024 | Parachute Red Flare Distress Signals | Day and Night1 | 3 |
| 160.036 | Hand-Held Rocket-Propelled Parachute Red Flare Distress Signals | Day and Night | 3 |
| 160.037 | Hand-Held Orange Smoke Distress Signals | Day Only | 3 |
| 160.057 | Floating Orange Smoke Distress Signals | Day Only | 3 |
| 160.066 | Distress Signal for Boats, Red Aerial Pyrotechnic Flare | Day and Night2 | 3 |
| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 These signals require use in combination with a suitable launching device approved under [46 CFR 160.028](/on/2024-09-23/title-46/section-160.028). | | | |
| 2 These devices may be either meteor or parachute assisted type. Some of these signals may require use in combination with a suitable launching device approved under [46 CFR 160.028](/on/2024-09-23/title-46/section-160.028). | | | |
| 3 Must have manufacture date of 1 Oct. 1980 or later. | | | |

[CGD 81-038-A, [47 FR 24548](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/47-FR-24548), June 7, 1982]
##### 



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
 FORM 10-K/A
 (Amendment No. 1)
 þ
    
    ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005
 OR
 o
    
    TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 For the transition period from  to
  MAVERICK TUBE CORPORATION
  
 Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
    
    43-1455766
(IRS Employer Identification No.)16401 Swingley Ridge Road, Seventh Floor
Chesterfield, Missouri
(Address of principal executive offices)
    
    63017
(Zip Code)
 Registrants telephone number, including area code: (636) 733-1600
 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
 Title of Each Class
    
    Name of Each Exchange on Which RegisteredCommon Stock, Par Value $0.01 Per Share
Preferred Stock Purchase Rights
    
    New York Stock Exchange
New York Stock Exchange
 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
 þ o
 o þ
 þ o
 o
  þ o o
 o þ




---



##### 



Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K
For the Year Ended December 31, 2005
 EXPLANATORY NOTE
   31.1
    
    Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.31.2
    
    Certification of the Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Rule
13a-14(a) of Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.32.1
    
    Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.32.2
    
    Certification of the Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.




---



##### 



SIGNATURES
  Maverick Tube Corporation(registrant) April 6, 2006
    
    /s/ C. Robert BunchC. Robert Bunch, Chairman of the Board of Directors,President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive  Officer)
§ 1120.42 Release of exempt documents. ( a ) An A&TBCB office may, in its discretion, release requested records despite the applicability of one or more of the exemptions listed in § 1120.41 (a)(2), (5), or (7). Disclosure of such records is encouraged if no important purpose would be served by withholding the records.
( b ) Though the policy of the A&TBCB is to honor all requests, as indicated in § 1120.21(a), there are circumstances when the A&TBCB will not disclose a record if one or more of the FOIA exemptions applies to the record. The exemptions usually in such circumstances are exemptions (2), (3), (4), (6), (8) and (9). In these cases, where the A&TBCB has withheld a requested record, or portions thereof, the A&TBCB will disclose the exempted record when ordered to do so by a Federal court or in exceptional circumstances under appropriate restrictions with the approval of the Office of General Counsel.
# EUR-Lex - 12004V/AFI/DCL/40 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V/AFI/DCL/40

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - FINAL ACT - B. Declarations concerning Protocols annexed to the Constitution - Declarations concerning the Protocol on the Treaty and the Act of Accession of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia and the Slovak Republic - 40.Declaration concerning the Protocol on the transitional provisions relating to the institutions and bodies of the Union **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0470 - 0471 *

40. Declaration concerning the Protocol on the transitional provisions relating to the institutions and bodies of the Union

The common position which will be taken by the Member States at the conferences on the accession to the Union of Romania and/or Bulgaria regarding the allocation of seats in the European Parliament and the weighting of votes in the European Council and the Council will be as follows.

1. If the accession to the Union of Romania and/or Bulgaria takes place before the entry into force of the European Council Decision referred to in Article I-20(2), the allocation of seats in the European Parliament throughout the 2004-2009 parliamentary term will be in accordance with the following table for a Union of 27 Member States.

MEMBER STATES | SEATS IN THE EP |

Germany | 99 |

United Kingdom | 78 |

France | 78 |

Italy | 78 |

Spain | 54 |

Poland | 54 |

Romania | 35 |

Netherlands | 27 |

Greece | 24 |

Czech Republic | 24 |

Belgium | 24 |

Hungary | 24 |

Portugal | 24 |

Sweden | 19 |

Bulgaria | 18 |

Austria | 18 |

Slovakia | 14 |

Denmark | 14 |

Finland | 14 |

Ireland | 13 |

Lithuania | 13 |

Latvia | 9 |

Slovenia | 7 |

Estonia | 6 |

Cyprus | 6 |

Luxembourg | 6 |

Malta | 5 |

TOTAL | 785 |

The Treaty of Accession to the Union will therefore, by way of derogation from Article I-20(2) of the Constitution, stipulate that the number of members of the European Parliament may temporarily exceed 750 for the remainder of the 2004 to 2009 Parliamentary term.

2. In Article 2(2) of the Protocol on the transitional provisions relating to the institutions and bodies of the Union, the weighting of the votes of Romania and Bulgaria in the European Council and the Council will be set at 14 and 10 respectively.

3. At the time of each accession, the threshold referred to in the Protocol on the transitional provisions relating to the institutions and bodies of the Union will be calculated according to Article 2(3) of that Protocol.

--------------------------------------------------
# EUR-Lex - 12004V078 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V078

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART II — THE CHARTER OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THE UNION - TITLE II — FREEDOMS - Article II-78 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0045 - 0045 *

Article II-78

Right to asylum

The right to asylum shall be guaranteed with due respect for the rules of the Geneva Convention of 28 July 1951 and the Protocol of 31 January 1967 relating to the status of refugees and in accordance with the Constitution.

--------------------------------------------------
# EUR-Lex - 12006E170 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12006E170

**Treaty establishing the European Community (consolidated version) - Part Three - Community policies - TITLE XVIII - Research and technological development - Article 170 **

*
Official Journal C 321 E , 29/12/2006 P. 0122 - 0122 Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0107 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0254 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0051 - Consolidated version *

Article 170

In implementing the multiannual framework programme the Community may make provision for cooperation in Community research, technological development and demonstration with third countries or international organisations.

The detailed arrangements for such cooperation may be the subject of agreements between the Community and the third parties concerned, which shall be negotiated and concluded in accordance with Article 300.

--------------------------------------------------
# EUR-Lex - 12005SP029 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12005SP029

**Protocol concerning the conditions and arrangements for admission of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania to the European Union - PART FOUR:TEMPORARY PROVISIONS - TITLE III:FINANCIAL PROVISIONS - Article 29 **

*
Official Journal L 157 , 21/06/2005 P. 0038 - 0038 *

Article 29

Where the period for multiannual commitments made under the SAPARD programme [14] in relation to afforestation of agricultural land, support for the establishment of producer groups or agri‐environment schemes extends beyond the final permissible date for payments under SAPARD, the outstanding commitments will be covered within the 2007-2013 rural development programme. Should specific transitional measures be necessary in this regard, these shall be adopted in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 50(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 of 21 June 1999 laying down general provisions on the Structural Funds [15].

[14] Council Regulation (EC) No 1268/1999 of 21.6.1999 on Community support for pre-accession measures for agriculture and rural development in the applicant countries of Central and Eastern Europe in the pre-accession period (OJ L 161, 26.6.1999, p. 87). Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2008/2004 (OJ L 349, 25.11.2004, p. 12).

[15] OJ L 161, 26.6.1999, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by the 2003 Act of Accession (OJ L 236, 23.9.2003, p. 33).

--------------------------------------------------
Your session is about to expire.Resume session

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Welcome.Log inorregisterCOPS OFFICE RESOURCE CENTER

HomeCatalogCartOrders

                    

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                CatalogMatches: 1Offline form Recent Popular Online Print OtherCOPS-W0735Building Relationships of Trust ToolkitThe Building Relationships of Trust Toolkit includes six components that provide detailed information police officers and community members should consider when trying to build trusting relationships. Its feature publication, Moving to Implementation, focuses on issues related to bringing communities into the public safety and policing process at the local level. The Recommended Steps for Chief Executives lists actions executives can take to ensure the process of developing relationships of trust continues. In addition, the toolkit includes a video overview, a list of commonly used terms, a community perception survey, and in-service curriculum training modules.By Robert Wasserman, Zachary Ginsburg, Institute for Intergovernmental ResearchCategories: Community PartnershipsLanguage: EnglishPublic linkhttps://portal.cops.usdoj.gov/resourcecenter?item=cops-w0735Click here to see the entire catalog.Cart:Download PDFWeb • Jun 2014Search catalogreset title abstract authors contentContaining text: exact phraseNot containing text: exact phraseLanguage:anyEnglishSpanishHmongVietnameseCategory:anyAlternatives to IncarcerationCommunity PartnershipsData and AnalysisEthics and IntegrityFoundations of Community PolicingHiring, Recruitment, and RetentionHomeland SecurityNew Immigrant CommunitiesNonviolent CrimeOtherPolice OperationsPOP Center ResourceSchool and Campus SafetyTechnologyTribalViolent CrimeYouth SafetyPublished after:Published before:Page1

                    

FOIA | No FEAR Act | Open Government | Privacy | Legal|HelpCopyright (C) U.S. Department of Justice, COPS Office, IT Division, 2012 - 2024. All rights reserved.
Rendered on Mon Mar 4 2024 at 05:59 (UTC-5) in 0.22 secEnterprise Framework 3.21.7.7 • Store Controls 3.3.1.7Survey 500303407 Section 60000560 Rules Hints Inactive
DATE: December 7, 2021

The following cases in which the Court of Appeals issued published opinions have been

appealed to the Supreme Court:

1

. Caine Calif Davis

v. Commonwealth of Virginia

Record No. 1134

- 20

- 4

Opinion rendered by Judge Humphreys on

September 28, 2021

2

. William Joseph Morgan

v. Commonwealth of Virginia

Record No. 1139

- 20

- 1

Opinion rendered by Judge Huff on

October 5, 2021

3. Alonzo Devon White

v. Commonwealth of Virginia

Record No. 0994

- 20

- 4

Opinion rendered by Judge Russell on

October 12, 2021The following cases in which the Court of Appeals issued published opinions have been

disposed of by the Supreme Court:

1. Shaka Markel Long

v. Commonwealth of Virginia

Record No. 1971

- 19

- 1

Opinion rendered by Judge Beales

on Ja nuary 26, 2021

Refused (210205)

2

. Clyde Carleton Koons, IV, f/k/a Clyde Carleton Crane, IV

v. Leslie Elizabeth Crane

Record No. 0580

- 20

- 4

Opinion rendered by Judge O’Brien

on February 2, 2021

Dismissed pursuant to Code § 17.1

- 410(A)(3) and (B) (210238)

3

. Jason L. Brooks

v. Commonwealth of Virginia

Record No. 0209

- 21

- 4

Opinion rendered by Judge Humphreys

on April 13, 2021

Refused ( 210457)