alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1011.9 When will the Presidio Trust transfer a debt to the Financial Management Service for collection? ( a ) *Cross-servicing.* Unless a delinquent debt has previously been transferred to the FMS for administrative offset in accordance with § 1011.10, the Presidio Trust will transfer any eligible debt that is more than 180 days delinquent to the FMS for debt collection services, a process known as “cross-servicing.” The Presidio Trust may transfer debts delinquent 180 days or less to the FMS in accordance with the procedures described in 31 CFR 285.12. The FMS takes appropriate action to collect or compromise the transferred debt, or to suspend or terminate collection action thereon, in accordance with the statutory and regulatory requirements and authorities applicable to the debt and the collection action to be taken. Appropriate action includes, without limitation, contact with the debtor, referral of the debt to the Treasury Offset Program, private collection agencies or the Department of Justice, reporting of the debt to credit bureaus, and administrative wage garnishment.
( b ) *Notice; certification.* At least 60 days prior to transferring a debt to the FMS, the Presidio Trust will send notice to the debtor as required by § 1011.4 of this part. The Presidio Trust will certify to the FMS, in writing, that the debt is valid, delinquent, legally enforceable and that there are no legal bars to collection. In addition, the Presidio Trust will certify its compliance with all applicable due process and other requirements as described in this part and other Federal laws.
( c ) *Treasury Offset Program.* As part of its debt collection process, the FMS uses the Treasury Offset Program to collect debts by administrative and tax refund offset. The Treasury Offset Program is a centralized offset program administered by the FMS to collect delinquent debts owed to Federal agencies and states (including past-due child support). Under the Treasury Offset Program, before a federal payment is disbursed, the FMS compares the name and taxpayer identification number (TIN) of the payee with the names and TINs of debtors that have been submitted by Federal agencies and states to the Treasury Offset Program database. If there is a match, the FMS (or, in some cases, another Federal disbursing agency) offsets all or a portion of the federal payment, disburses any remaining payment to the payee, and pays the offset amount to the creditor agency. Federal payments eligible for offset include, without limitation, income tax refunds, salary, travel advances and reimbursements, retirement and vendor payments, and Social Security and other benefit payments.
[70 FR 73588, Dec. 13, 2005, as amended at 83 FR 50838, Oct. 10, 2018]
Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
Required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350  (as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: November 14, 2011
    
    /s/ DEBORAH A. BASTIAN

Deborah A. BastianChief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
# EUR-Lex - 12008E057 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008E057

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - PART THREE: UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS - TITLE IV: FREE MOVEMENT OF PERSONS, SERVICES AND CAPITAL - Chapter 3: Services - Article 57 (ex Article 50 TEC) **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0070 - 0070 *

Article 57

(ex Article 50 TEC)

Services shall be considered to be "services" within the meaning of the Treaties where they are normally provided for remuneration, in so far as they are not governed by the provisions relating to freedom of movement for goods, capital and persons.

"Services" shall in particular include:

(a) activities of an industrial character;

(b) activities of a commercial character;

(c) activities of craftsmen;

(d) activities of the professions.

Without prejudice to the provisions of the Chapter relating to the right of establishment, the person providing a service may, in order to do so, temporarily pursue his activity in the Member State where the service is provided, under the same conditions as are imposed by that State on its own nationals.

--------------------------------------------------
§ 1011.18 How does a debtor request a special review based on a change in circumstances such as catastrophic illness, divorce, death or disability? ( a ) *Material change in circumstances.* A debtor who owes a debt may, at any time, request a special review by the Presidio Trust of the amount of any offset, administrative wage garnishment or voluntary payment, based on materially changed circumstances beyond the control of the debtor such as, without limitation, catastrophic illness, divorce, death or disability.
( b ) *Inability to pay.* For purposes of this section, in determining whether an involuntary or voluntary payment would prevent the debtor from meeting essential subsistence expenses (costs incurred for food, housing, clothing, transportation and medical care), the debtor must submit a detailed statement and supporting documents for the debtor, the debtor's, and dependents, indicating: ( 1 ) Income from all sources;
( 2 ) Assets;
( 3 ) Liabilities;
( 4 ) Number of dependents;
( 5 ) Expenses for food, housing, clothing and transportation;
( 6 ) Medical expenses; and
( 7 ) Exceptional expenses, if any.
( c ) *Alternative payment arrangement.* If the debtor requests a special review under this section, the debtor must submit an alternative proposed payment schedule and a statement to the Presidio Trust, with supporting documents, showing why the current offset, garnishment or repayment schedule imposes an extreme financial hardship on the debtor. The Presidio Trust will evaluate the statement and documentation and determine whether the current offset, garnishment or repayment schedule imposes extreme financial hardship on the debtor. The Presidio Trust will notify the debtor in writing of such determination, including, if appropriate, a revised offset, garnishment or payment schedule. If the special review results in a revised offset, garnishment or repayment schedule, the Presidio Trust will notify the appropriate agency or other persons about the new terms.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1



                    INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS' CONSENT


Cross Timbers Oil Company
Fort Worth, Texas

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-64274, 33-65238,
33-81766, 333-35229 and 333-36569) and on Form S-3 (No. 333-46909) of Cross
Timbers Oil Company and Form S-3 (No. 333-56983) of Cross Timbers Oil Company
and Cross Timbers Royalty Trust of our report dated March 12, 1999, included in
the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Cross Timbers Oil Company for the year ended
December 31, 1998.



ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Fort Worth, Texas
April 9, 1999
**IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

((((((((((((((((

No. 11-0344

((((((((((((((((

Clifton Thomas, M.D., Petitioner

v.

Aracelly Torrez, Individually, and as Representative of the Estate of Ricardo Torrez and as Next Friend of Ricardo Isaiah Torrez, Minor Child, Respondents

((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((

On Petition for Review

((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((

**ORDER**

1.The unopposed motion to abate appeal, filed on August 29, 2011, is granted, and this case is **ABATED** to allow the parties to proceed with finalizing their settlement.

2.This case is removed from the Court's active docket until October 3, 2011, by which time the parties must file either a status report or a motion to dismiss.  The parties shall immediately notify this Court about any changes in the status of the case.

Done at the City of Austin, this 2nd day of September, 2011.

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

Supreme Court of Texas

By Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk
EXHIBIT 32.2
                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO\
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the quarterly report of Cactus New Media I, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, RS
Schmitt, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



Date: August 11, 2003

/s/RS Schmitt
---------------------------
RS Schmitt
Principal Financial Officer
#### § 1005.7 Construction of buildings or other facilities.

Constructing or attempting to construct a building, or other structure, boat dock, road, trail, path, or other way, telephone line, telegraph line, power line, or any other private or public utility, upon, across, over, through, or under any area administered by the Presidio Trust, except in accordance with the provisions of a valid permit, contract, or other written agreement with the United States, is prohibited.
#### § 1237.1 What is the applicability and scope of this part?

Agencies must manage audiovisual, cartographic, and related records in accordance with parts 1220-1235. This part prescribes additional policies and procedures for managing audiovisual, cartographic, and related records to ensure adequate and proper documentation and authorized, timely, and appropriate disposition.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000869660
<NAME>                        WNC CALIFORNIA HOUSING TAX CREDITS II, L.P.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                             364,853
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   364,853
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   6,605,413
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,528,028
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     6,605,413
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     4,060
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       73,058
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   178,363
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (247,361)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (247,361)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (247,361)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (13.82)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0



</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-1649

MICHAEL R. FULLER; NANCY J. HALSTEAD,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

versus

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Chief District Judge. (CA-96-611-A)

Submitted: September 20, 1996 Decided: October 3, 1996

Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael R. Fuller, Nancy J. Halstead, Appellants Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellants appeal from the district court's order denying

their request for an emergency restraining order and for records.

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and

find no reversible error. See Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37

(1971). Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Fuller v. Virginia, No. CA-96-611-A (E.D. Va. May 9, 1996).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
§ 1009.4 Payment of claims. ( a ) In making an award from proceeds or revenues of the Presidio Trust, the Presidio Trust will process payment using an agreement signed by the claimant and the Executive Director, or his or her designee. In making an award from proceeds or revenues not provided for by the Presidio Trust, the Presidio Trust will process payment as prescribed by 28 CFR 14.10.
( b ) Prior to payment, appropriate releases shall be obtained as provided in 28 CFR 14.10.
( c ) Any award, compromise, or settlement in excess of $25,000 shall be effected only with the prior written approval of the Attorney General or his or her designee.
[83 FR 50837, Oct. 10, 2018]
# Map            Indonesia.
##### 



Exhibit 32.01 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (the Exchange Act), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code
(18 U.S.C. §1350), Gary L. Bloom, Chief Executive Officer of VERITAS Software Corporation (the
Company), and Edwin J. Gillis, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies
that:  1.
    The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005, to which
this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.01 (the Quarterly Report), fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act, and  2.
    The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. In Witness Whereof, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of the 9th day of
May, 2005. /s/ Gary L. Bloom
    
    /s/ Edwin J. GillisGary L. Bloom
    
    Edwin J. GillisChief Executive Officer
    
    Chief Financial Officer
 This certification which accompanies the Quarterly Report, is not deemed filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company
under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act (whether made before or after the date of the
Quarterly Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
# EUR-Lex - 12008E032 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008E032

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - PART THREE: UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS - TITLE II: FREE MOVEMENT OF GOODS - Chapter 1: The customs union - Article 32 (ex Article 27 TEC) **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0060 - 0060 *

Article 32

(ex Article 27 TEC)

In carrying out the tasks entrusted to it under this Chapter the Commission shall be guided by:

(a) the need to promote trade between Member States and third countries;

(b) developments in conditions of competition within the Union in so far as they lead to an improvement in the competitive capacity of undertakings;

(c) the requirements of the Union as regards the supply of raw materials and semi-finished goods; in this connection the Commission shall take care to avoid distorting conditions of competition between Member States in respect of finished goods;

(d) the need to avoid serious disturbances in the economies of Member States and to ensure rational development of production and an expansion of consumption within the Union.

--------------------------------------------------
1 In The 

### Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

_________________

NO. 09-17-00233-CV



### _________________
IN RE S.D.

___________________ __________________ __________________ _________________ Original Proceeding 418th District Court of Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 16-06-06557-CV

___________________ __________________ __________________ _________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION Relator, S.D., petitioned to compel th e Judge of the 418th District Court of Montgomery County, Texas, to set a hearing on pending motions and render a decision regarding access and possession in a suit involving a child in the care of the Texas Department of Family and Protectiv e Services. Mandamus relief is proper to correct a clear abuse of discretion when there is no adequate remedy by appeal. In re Dep’t of Family & Protective Servs. , 273 S.W.3d 637, 643 (Tex. 2009). After reviewing the petition and the responses of th e real parties in interest, we conclude2 that Relator has not shown that she is en titled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied.
PETITION DENIED. PER CURIAM Submitted on July 14, 2017 Opinion Delivered August 3, 2017 Before McKeithen, C.J., Kr eger and Horton, JJ.
# EUR-Lex - 12006E025 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12006E025

**Treaty establishing the European Community (consolidated version) - Part Three - Community policies - TITLE I - Free movement of goods - Article 25 **

*
Official Journal C 321 E , 29/12/2006 P. 0052 - 0052 Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0046 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0188 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0012 - Consolidated version (EEC Treaty - no official publication available) *

Article 25

Customs duties on imports and exports and charges having equivalent effect shall be prohibited between Member States. This prohibition shall also apply to customs duties of a fiscal nature.

--------------------------------------------------
#### J. Noyes Shaughnessy, Respondent, *v.*Arthur D. Weekes, Appellant.

(Submitted March 13, 1907;

decided April 2, 1907.)

*Shaughnessy*v. *Weekes,*111 App. Div. 918, affirmed.

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme’ Court in the second judicial department, entered January 20, 1906, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for "a. new trial in an action to recover for services alleged to have been rendered by a real estate broker in procuring the sale of real property.

*572
      *Edgar M. Leventritt*and *Henry A. Forster*for appellant.

*J. CuTbert Palmer*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Yann, Werner, Hiscook and Chase, JJ. Hot sitting: Willard Bartlett, J.
§ 84.31 An overview of the ranking criteria. ( a ) The primary objective of the proposal will be to acquire, restore, enhance, or manage coastal wetlands to benefit coastal wetlands and the hydrology, water quality, and fish and wildlife dependent upon them. The Program will not provide grants, for example, for construction or repair of boat ramps or docks for recreational purposes and construction or support of research facilities or activities. The purpose of the ranking criteria is to provide a means for selecting the best projects—those that produce the maximum benefits to coastal wetlands and the fish and wildlife that depend on them.
( b ) *Proposal ranking factors* — ( 1 ) *Ranking criteria.* As explained in § 84.32, we will evaluate proposals according to 13 ranking criteria. These criteria have varying point values. Proposals must address each of these 13 criteria.
( 2 ) *Additional considerations.* Even though the criteria provide the primary evaluation of proposals, we may factor additional considerations into the ranking decision at the national level. In case of a tie, we will use these additional considerations to rank proposals having identical scores.
( c ) The criteria in § 84.32 are not listed in priority order.
( d ) Points are assigned on the basis of a completed project, rather than current conditions, e.g., count 50 acres of estuarine emergent wetlands if 50 acres of that habitat type will be restored when the project is completed.
( e ) A range of points rather than a set point value allows the reviewer to distinguish between, for example, a proposal that provides some foraging habitat for a threatened species versus one that provides critical nesting habitat of several endangered species. Scoring guidance is included with the individual criteria.
( f ) A total of 64 points is possible under the scoring system.
( g ) If a grant proposal is not selected, the State may resubmit it for reconsideration in subsequent fiscal years. Resubmission of a grant proposal is the responsibility of the applicant.
#### § 1238.24 What are NARA inspection requirements for temporary microform records?

NARA recommends, but does not require, that agencies use the inspection procedures described in § 1238.22(a).
#### § 92.2 Authority.

The Secretary of the Interior issues the regulations in this part under the authority granted to the Secretary by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA), 16 U.S.C. 703-712.
§ 600.1515 Litigation support. ( a ) All technical aspects of a type-approved EMTU, EMTU-C, MTU, MCS, or bundle are subject to being admitted as evidence in a court of law, if needed. The reliability of all technologies utilized in the EMTU, EMTU-C, MTU, MCS, or bundle may be analyzed in court for, inter alia, testing procedures, error rates, peer review, technical processes and general industry acceptance.
( b ) The type-approval holder must, as a requirement of the holder's type-approval, provide technical and expert support for litigation to substantiate the EMTU/EMTU-C, MCS, or bundle capabilities to establish NMFS Office of Law Enforcement cases against violators, as needed. If the technologies have previously been subject to such scrutiny in a court of law, the type-approval holder must provide NMFS with a brief summary of the litigation and any court findings on the reliability of the technology.
( c ) The type-approval holder will be required to sign a non-disclosure agreement limiting the release of certain information that might compromise the effectiveness of the VMS operations.
§ 18.5 May property be leased without receiving fair market value rent? Property may be leased under this part only if the lease requires payment of rent to the government equal to or higher than the property's fair market value rent. The determination of fair market value rent shall take into account: ( a ) Any restrictions on the use of the property or terms of the lease that limit the value and/or the highest and best use of the property; and
( b ) Any requirements under the lease for the lessee to restore, rehabilitate or otherwise improve the leased property.