alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
10.3


Officer
Bonus Plan


Bonus
Calculation


All
vice presidents (“Participants”) of Websense, Inc. (the “Company”) not covered
by another cash incentive compensation program will be eligible for a target
bonus of 25% of their annual salary. 
This bonus is based upon the Company meeting its Billings and/or
Operating Income objectives.


Subject to discretionary adjustment, each half of the Company’s fiscal
year (January — June and July — December) in which the Company meets its
budgeted Billings and/or Operating Income targets, each Participant is eligible
to receive an amount equal to 16.67% of their semi-annual salary as a
bonus.  Half of the semi-annual bonus
(8.335%) is earned if the Company meets its semi-annual Billings objective and
the other half of the semi-annual bonus (8.335%) is earned if the Company
achieves its semi-annual Operating Income target.


Subject to discretionary adjustment, an additional 8.33% of a
Participant’s annual salary may be earned, again split evenly between
objectives, if the Company achieves its annual Billings and Operating Income
targets.


Achievement of at least 90% of a goal is
required for any payment of the portion of the Participant’s bonus that is
based on achievement by the Company of that goal.  Should the Company achieve 90% of its
Billings or Operating Income goals, bonuses for that plan goal will be paid at
half of the target payment for that goal. 
Should the Company achieve 110% of its Billings or Operating Income
goals, bonuses for that plan goal will be paid at 1.5 times what a Participant
would have been paid on target for that goal. 
Bonuses are prorated for goal achievement between 90% - 110%.


The Compensation Committee or Board of
Directors has the discretion to adjust the bonus based upon whether the Participant
meets individual objectives set for the Participant by the Participant’s
manager.  Bonuses may be adjusted by a
percentage of the bonus, ranging from 0% - 130% based upon achievement of such
performance objectives.


Eligibility


Participants must be a current employee
on the last day of the semi annual period (June 30th and December 31st) to be
eligible to receive a bonus for that half and must be a current employee on the
last day of the fiscal year to be eligible to receive an annual bonus.  Participants who start their employment
during a period or are promoted into a Participant position must be employed
for at least the full final quarter of the semi annual period or annual period
to be eligible, and will have their bonus prorated accordingly.  Bonus amounts are based upon actual base
salary paid during the period, exclusive of other payments or bonuses.


The Company reserves the right to change
these terms from time to time as it feels necessary to accomplish its goals,
including as a result of market conditions, personnel, new or different product
offerings and/or corporate restructuring.
Home
About
2020 Federal View Point Survey Results
	About DTIC
	Administrator
	Announcements
	Contact Us
	DTIC’s Past and Future
	DTIC Strategic Plan
	Employment
	Sitemap
Products & Services
DTIC’s Products & Services
	DTIC Registration Benefits
	DTIC Combatant Command (CCMD) Classified Reading Room
	Training
Submit Documents
Sign In
Operating Status
 Defense Technical Information Center
				*Search this site, DoD S&T Reports, and more..*

**Internet Explorer Users:** It is recommended that you use the Google Chrome or Microsoft Edge browser for an optimal experience with this application as Microsoft’s support for Internet Explorer is ending.
	DISMISS Research Tip of Week
		July 20, 2018light bulb
		
			
	
	Use Advanced Search to find R2s for a Program Element number.
 Recent Posts
		DTIC Journal Article Is Published
											April 16, 2021
											DTIC publishes special edition of peer-reviewed scientific journal JDR&E
											November 12, 2020
											CUI marking framework guidance now available.
											November 10, 2020
											EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY: New submission requirements for DoD-funded journal articles
											September 24, 2020
											House Appropriations Committee Report on the Defense Appropriations Act for FY2021
											July 21, 2020 Archives
			April 2021
	November 2020
	September 2020
	July 2020
	February 2020
	January 2020
	December 2019
	September 2019
	August 2019
	June 2019
	April 2019
	March 2019
	February 2019
	January 2019
	September 2018
	August 2018
	July 2018
	January 2018
	February 2017
 **DEFENSE TECHNICAL INFORMATION CENTER**
8725 John J. Kingman Road
Fort Belvoir, Virginia 22060-6218
(800) 225-3842https://Discover.DTIC.mil
			AdministratorContact UsDoD Privacy ProgramEEOEmploymentFOIAInformation Analysis Centers
			Information QualityLegalMission StatementNo FEAR ActOpen GovernmentPlain Language
			Policy MemorandaPrivacy PolicySAPRStrategic PlanSubmit DocumentsUSA.govUSD(R&E)
			LinkedIn

NOTICE:  The appearance of hyperlinks does not constitute endorsement by the DTIC of non-U.S. Government sites or the information, products, or services contained therein.  Although the DTIC may or may not use these sites as additional distribution channels for Department of Defense information, it does not exercise editorial control over all of the information that you may find at these locations.  Such hyperlinks are provided consistent with the stated purpose of this website. The DTIC bears no responsibility for the accuracy, legality or content of the external website or for that of subsequent links. Contact the external website for answers to questions regarding its content. Please let us know about existing external links which you believe are inappropriate.
# EUR-Lex - 12004V328 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V328

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART III — THE POLICIES AND FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - TITLE V — THE UNION'S EXTERNAL ACTION - CHAPTER VII — THE UNION'S RELATIONS WITH INTERNATIONAL ORGANISATIONS AND THIRD COUNTRIES AND UNION DELEGATIONS - Article III-328 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0149 - 0149 *

Article III-328

1. Union delegations in third countries and at international organisations shall represent the Union.

2. Union delegations shall be placed under the authority of the Union Minister for Foreign Affairs. They shall act in close cooperation with Member States' diplomatic and consular missions.

--------------------------------------------------
Case 16-26658 Doc 5 Filed 08/19/16 Entered 08/19/16 11:26:07 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2
Case 16-26658 Doc 5 Filed 08/19/16 Entered 08/19/16 11:26:07 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2
MUR808200229
MUR808200230
# EUR-Lex - 12006E150 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12006E150

**Treaty establishing the European Community (consolidated version) - Part Three - Community policies - TITLE XI - Social policy, education, vocational training and youth - Chapter 3 - Education, vocational training and youth - Article 150 **

*
Official Journal C 321 E , 29/12/2006 P. 0113 - 0113 Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0098 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0245 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0047 - Consolidated version (EEC Treaty - no official publication available) *

Article 150

1. The Community shall implement a vocational training policy which shall support and supplement the action of the Member States, while fully respecting the responsibility of the Member States for the content and organisation of vocational training.

2. Community action shall aim to:

- facilitate adaptation to industrial changes, in particular through vocational training and retraining,

- improve initial and continuing vocational training in order to facilitate vocational integration and reintegration into the labour market,

- facilitate access to vocational training and encourage mobility of instructors and trainees and particularly young people,

- stimulate cooperation on training between educational or training establishments and firms,

- develop exchanges of information and experience on issues common to the training systems of the Member States.

3. The Community and the Member States shall foster cooperation with third countries and the competent international organisations in the sphere of vocational training.

4. The Council, acting in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 251 and after consulting the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, shall adopt measures to contribute to the achievement of the objectives referred to in this Article, excluding any harmonisation of the laws and regulations of the Member States.

--------------------------------------------------
Memorandum

Subject: Telephone conversation between Nathan Topham, USEPA and Mark 

DeLaquil, Baker Hostetler

Date: April 3, 2013

Participants: Nathan Topham, U.S. EPA

Mark DeLaquil, Baker Hostetler

On April 3, 2013, a telephone conversation took place between Nathan Topham and Mark 

DeLaquil. Mr. Topham and Mr. DeLaquil discussed follow-up questions posed by Mr. Topham 

following a meeting between representatives of US EPA, Baker Hostetler, and East Penn that 

took place the morning of April 3, 2013. 

The April 3, 2013 meeting is summarized in a separate memorandum included in docket EPAHQ-OAR-2011-0344. East Penn requested the meeting to present information to US EPA related 

to East Penn’s planned submission of a request for an alternative standard pursuant to CAA 

section 112(h)(3). 

Mr. Topham asked if providing facilities discretion to choose which wall of a total enclosure to 

define as the “windward wall” would provide sufficient flexibility to resolve East Penn’s 

uncertainty regarding placement of pressure monitors discussed when the parties met on April 

3

rd

. Mr. Topham explained that the choice of windward wall would be added to the mandatory

recordkeeping requirements and that this only applies when a totally enclosed area is inside of or 

a part of a larger structure shielding the enclosed area from the effects of ambient wind. 

Mr. Topham also asked, “If US EPA provided clarification that a 15-minute averaging time for 

differential pressure monitoring data was intended in the 2012 final rule, would East Penn’s 

concern related to demonstrating negative pressure inside of total enclosures be resolved?”. 

Mr. DeLaquil informed Mr. Topham that he would confer with his clients and follow up with US 

EPA after East Penn had considered EPA’s questions.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.04


</TABLE>
Table 3 Flywool Stack Emission Rates

Company Rockwool Source Designation Flywool Test Date 3/29/2012 3/29/2012 3/29/2012

Meter/Nozzle Information P-1 P-2 P-3 Average

Meter Temperature Tm (F) 74.7 82.2 80.4 79.1 Meter Pressure - Pm (in. Hg) 30.2 30.2 30.1 30.2 Measured Sample Volume (Vm) 50.8 50.7 50.7 50.7 Sample Volume (Vm-Std ft3) 50.5 49.7 49.6 49.9 Sample Volume (Vm-Std m3) 1.43 1.41 1.41 1.41 Condensate Volume (Vw-std) 4.055 2.593 5.328 3.992 Gas Density (Ps(std) lbs/ft3) (wet) 0.0734 0.0733 0.0732 0.0733 Gas Density (Ps(std) lbs/ft3) (dry) 0.0745 0.0745 0.0745 0.0745 Total weight of sampled gas (m g lbs) (wet) 4.00 3.84 4.02 3.95 Total weight of sampled gas (m g lbs) (dry) 3.76 3.71 3.70 3.72 Nozzle Size - An (sq. ft.) 0.000252 0.000252 0.000252 0.000252 Isokinetic Variation - I 103.1 99.4 104.6 102.4

Stack Data

Average Stack Temperature - Ts (F) 85.2 87.2 90.4 87.6 Molecular Weight Stack Gas- dry (Md) 28.8 28.8 28.8 28.8 Molecular Weight Stack Gas-wet (Ms) 28.4 28.4 28.3 28.4 Stack Gas Specific Gravity (Gs) 0.980 0.980 0.978 0.979 Percent Moisture (Bws) 4.10 4.30 4.80 4.40 Water Vapor Volume(fraction) 0.0410 0.0430 0.0480 0.0440 Pressure - Ps ("Hg) 30.1 30.1 30.0 30.1 Average Stack Velocity -Vs (ft/sec) 53.1 53.1 53.5 53.2 Area of Stack (ft2) 80.0 80.0 80.0 80.0

Exhaust Gas Flowrate

Flowrate f t 3 (Actual) 255,07 9 254,81 1 256,86 5 255,58 5 Flowrate f t 3 (Standard Wet) 248,58 0 247,41 1 247,04 0 247,677 Flowrate f t 3 (Standard Dry ) 238,38 9 236,77 3 235,18 2 236,78 1 Flowrate m 3 (standard dry) 6,75 0 6,70 5 6,66 0 6,70 5

Production Rate

ton/hr 5.42 5.61 5.82 5.62

Total Formaldehyde Weights (mg)

Sample Catch 2.4 1.5 2.7 2.2 Blank correction 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total 2.4 1.5 2.7 2.2

Total Formaldehyde Concentration lb/1000 lb (wet) 1.33E-03 8.62E-04 1.48E-03 1.22E-03 lb/1000 lb (dry) 1.41E-03 8.92E-04 1.61E-03 1.31E-03 mg/dscm (dry) 1.69 1.07 1.92 1.56 Total Formaldehyde Emission Rate lb/ hr 1.51 0.95 1.69 1.38 lb/ton 0.278 0.168 0.291 0.25 Total Methanol Weight (ug)

Sample Catch 351.00 282.00 283.00 305.33 Blank correction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 351.00 282.00 283.00 305.33

Total Methanol Concentration lb/1000 lb (wet) 1.93E-04 1.62E-04 1.55E-04 1.70E-04 lb/1000 lb (dry) 2.06E-04 1.68E-04 1.69E-04 1.81E-04 mg/dscm (dry) 2.46E-01 2.00E-01 2.01E-01 2.16E-01 Total Methanol Emission Rate lb/ hr 0.219 0.178 0.177 0.191 lb/ton 0.040 0.032 0.030 0.034 Total Phenol Weight (ug)

Sample Catch 634.00 498.00 658.00 596.67 Blank correction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 634.00 498.00 658.00 596.67

Total Phenol Concentration lb/1000 lb (wet) 3.49E-04 2.86E-04 3.61E-04 3.32E-04 lb/1000 lb (dry) 3.71E-04 2.96E-04 3.92E-04 3.53E-04 mg/dscm (dry) 4.43E-01 3.54E-01 4.68E-01 4.22E-01 Total Phenol Emission Rate lb/ hr 0.396 0.314 0.412 0.374 lb/ton 0.073 0.056 0.071 0.067
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Delta Regional Authority","provider_url":"https:\/\/dra.gov","author_name":"AhaZapier","author_url":"https:\/\/dra.gov\/author\/ahazapier\/","title":"Biden-Harris Administration Announces Over $3.3 Million Investment into Louisiana Communities - Delta Regional Authority","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"rPnmyLP95d\"><a href=\"https:\/\/dra.gov\/biden-harris-administration-announces-over-3-3-million-investment-into-louisiana-communities\/\">Biden-Harris Administration Announces Over $3.3 Million Investment into Louisiana Communities<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/dra.gov\/biden-harris-administration-announces-over-3-3-million-investment-into-louisiana-communities\/embed\/#?secret=rPnmyLP95d\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Biden-Harris Administration Announces Over $3.3 Million Investment into Louisiana Communities” — Delta Regional Authority\" data-secret=\"rPnmyLP95d\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"Biden-Harris Administration Announces Over $3.3 Million Investment into Louisiana Communities","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/mcusercontent.com\/90665e275659657eb2097e76c\/images\/3c279e98-4eee-68aa-d6e2-455119b8e0a5.png"}
§ 218.1 Specified activity and geographical region. ( a ) Regulations in this subpart apply only to the U.S. Navy (Navy) and those persons it authorizes or funds to conduct activities on its behalf for the taking of marine mammals that occurs in the areas outlined in paragraph (b) of this section and that occurs incidental to construction activities including marine structure maintenance, pile replacement, and select waterfront improvements at Naval Station (NAVSTA) Norfolk.
( b ) The taking of marine mammals by the Navy may be authorized in a Letter of Authorization (LOA) only if it occurs at NAVSTA Norfolk and adjacent Navy facilities.
1182FINALACTIONONREGULATIONSests.Thisaction,whichwasproposedforadoptionin35:9Md.R.919—921(April25,2008),hasbeenadoptedasproposed.EffectiveDate:June30,2008.C.JOHNSULLIVAN,JR.DirectorofAssessmentsandTaxation/Title26DEPARTMENTOFTHEENVIRONMENTSubtitle11AIRQUALITY26.11.26ConformityAuthority:EnvironmentArticle,§1-101,1-404,2-101—2-103,2-301—2-303,10-102,and10-103,AnnotatedCodeofMarylandNoticeofFinalAction[08-088-F]OnJune4,2008,theSecretaryoftheEnvironmentadoptedamendmentstoRegulation.05underCOMAR26.11.26Conformity.Thisaction,whichwasproposedforadoptionin35:7Md.R.763—764(March28,2008),hasbeenadoptedasproposed.EffectiveDate:June30,2008.SHARIT.WILSONSecretaryoftheEnvironmentTitle31MARYLANDINSURANCEADMINISTRATIONSubtitle08PROPERTYANDCASUALTYINSURANCE31.08.09GroupSelf-InsuranceforWorkers’CompensationAuthority:InsuranceArticle,§2-109,andTitle25,Subtitle3,AnnotatedCodeofMarylandNoticeofFinalAction[07-316-F-I]OnJune9,2008,theInsuranceCommissioneradoptednewRegulation.03,therecodificationofexistingRegulations.04,.05,.07—.12,and.14tobeRegulations.05,.06,.08—.13,and.15,respectively,theamendmentandrecodificationofexistingRegulations.03,.06,and.13tobeRegulations.04,.07,and.14,respectivelyunderCOMAR31.08.09GroupSelf-InsuranceforWorkers’Compensation.Thisaction,whichwasproposedforadoptionin34:26Md.R.2310—2311(December21,2007),hasbeenadoptedwiththenonsubstantivechangesshownbelow.EffectiveDate:June30,2008.AttorneyGeneral’sCertificationInaccordancewithStateGovernmentArticle,§10-113,AnnotatedCodeofMaryland,theAttorneyGeneralcertifiesthatthefollowingchangesdonotdiffersubstantivelyfromtheproposedtext.Thenatureofthechangesandthebasisforthisconclusionareasfollows:Regulation.14:Theword“Rebates”wasdeletedandthefollowingwasadded,“ForfundyearsinceptingbeforeJanuary1,2008,rebates”;“24”wasdeletedandreplacedwith“11”;andthefollowingsentencewasaddedattheend,“ForfundyearsinceptingonorafterJanuary1,2008,rebatesmaynotbepaidlessthan23monthsaftertheendofthefundyear”.Thepublishedregulationaddressedthetimingofrebates.Theonlychangemadetothepublishedregulationisaclanficationthatthechangeinthetimingofrebateswasintendedtobeprospectiveonly(forfundyearsinceptingonorafterJanuary1,2008).Thisrevisiontotheproposedregulationdoesnotprovideadditionalrequirementsoninterestedpartiesbutmerelyclarifiesthelanguageoftheoriginalrequirementsthatwerepreviouslypublished..14RebatesandTemporarySuspensionofMemberContributions.A.AnymoniesforafundyearinexcessoftheamountnecessarytofundallundiscountedlossesandlossadjustmentexpensesforthatfundyeaiactuariallydeterminedbyapersonmeetingtherequirementsofRegulation.13Bofthischapteimayberebatedtomembersofthegroup.[[Rebates]]ForfundyearsinceptingbeforeJanuary1,2008,rebatesmaynotbepaidlessthan[[24]]11monthsaftertheendofthefundyear.ForfundyearsinceptingonorafterJanuary1,2008,rebatesmaynotbepaidlessthan23monthsaftertheendofthefundyea!B.—C.(proposedtextunchanged)RALPHS.TYLERInsuranceCommissionerMARYLANDREGISTER,VOL.35,ISSUE13FRIDAY,JUNE20,2008
Conference call with representatives from the Pechanga Band of Luiseño Indians

Topic: Comments on the proposed SIP Requirements Rule for the 2008 ozone NAAQS Date: 7/31/13, 12:00 - 12:30 pm EDT Pechanga representatives: Gary Rubenstein, James Cohen, Sy ndi Smallwood EPA representatives: Laura McKelvey , Ken Israels, Karl Pepple Discussion

- Pechanga representatives explained their position regarding the “redesignation substitute” proposal in the anti - backsliding section of the proposed rule. Representatives als o indicated the role transport play s in their legacy nonattainment issue .

- Pechanga representatives detailed their plans to submit comments to the Tribal Council for approval, then submitting these comments to the docket.

- Discussion then turned to air quali ty monitoring on the Pechanga lands, and the requirements of a Clean Data Determination.