alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Strafford,

No. 4822.

#### Carolyn J. Peabody, *Adm’x v.*Robert L. O’Leary. Same *v.*Harris Motors, Inc.

Argued May 3, 1960.

Decided May 31, 1960.

*497*Fisher, Parsons & Moran (Mr. Moran*orally), for the plaintiff.

*Burns, Bryant & Hinchey (Mr. Hinchey*orally), for the defendants.

Lampeón, J.

The writ dated January 11, 1957, brought by the plaintiff against the defendant O’Leary was never served on him as required by the provisions of RSA ch. 510. Thus no jurisdiction was ever acquired over him by this writ. *Bissonnette*v. *Alpine, Inc.,*96 N. H. 419. It cannot be considered as constituting the bringing of an action for wrongful death which would satisfy the requirements of RSA 556:11.

A new writ for the same cause of action was brought against this defendant, served on him, and entered in court. However this writ is dated July 12, 1957, and was served on the defendant August 2, 1957. This action was not commenced within two years after the death of the deceased party on July 1, 1955, and was properly dismissed. *Poff*v. *Telephone Co.,*72 N. H. 164; *Kostoras*v. *Hines,*80 N. H. 500; *Costoras*v. *Noel,*100 N. H. 81, 82.

By motion made on April 21, 1958, plaintiff sought to join O’Leary as a party defendant in his action against Harris Motors Inc., “when a new defendant is brought in by amendment, the situation as to his rights and liabilities is what it would be if an original action against him were brought at that time. As to him, this is the beginning of the suit.” *Lewis*v. *Hines,*81 N. H. 24, 26. At the time this motion to amend was made the cause of action against O’Leary for the wrongful death of plaintiff’s intestate had expired as no action had been brought within two years of the date of his death. Therefore the denial of plaintiff’s motion to join O’Leary as a party defendant in the action against Harris Motors Inc., was proper. *Costoras*v. *Noel,*101 N. H. 71.

In view of the result reached it is unnecessary to consider defendant’s exception.

*Judgment for defendant O’Leary.*

All concurred.
**Exhibit 99.2**

 

**Certifications**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, each of the undersignedofficers of TELUS Corporation (“TELUS”) hereby certifies that to his knowledge,(a) the annual report for the period ended December 31, 2008 (the “Report”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and (b) theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of TELUS.

 

 
| Date: March 13,  2009. |                                                  |
|-----------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|
|                        |                                                  |
|                        |                                                  |
| By:                         | /s/ Darren Entwistle                                  |   |
|                        | Darren Entwistle                                      |   |
|                        | President and Chief Executive Officer                 |   |
|                        |                                                  |
|                        |                                                  |
| Date: March 13,  2009. |                                                  |
|                        |                                                  |
|                        |                                                  |
| By:                         | /s/ Robert G. McFarlane                               |   |
|                        | Robert G. McFarlane                                   |   |
|                        | Executive Vice President and Chief  Financial Officer |   |

 

----
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsVolume 1. Preliminary design study: AXAF x ray calibration spectrometers. Volume 2. Revised preliminary design study: AXAF x ray calibration spectrometersThe objective of this work was to provide a preliminary design concept for a Flux Monitor Spectrometer (FMS) for use at the X Ray Astrophysics Facility (XRAF) during High Resolution Mirror Assembly (HRMA) testing that met the requirements of SAO-AXAF-88-025 dated July 31, 1991. The calibration test team determined that the spectral resolution of the FMS had to be greater than or equal to twice that of all the AXAF spectrometers throughout the 0.1 to 10 KeV range of x-ray energies. Since this effectively doubled the resolution required by SAO-AXAF-88-025, a change order was approved by the Marshall Space Flight Center and given to Radiation Sciences to revise their study.Document ID19920023850Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateApril 7, 1992Subject CategoryAstronomyReport/Patent NumberNASA-CR-184340NAS 1.26:184340RS-30SAO-AXAF-FR-92-004Accession Number92N33094Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS8-36123CONTRACT_GRANT: S01-15526Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19920023850.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Case 16-24677 Doc 6 Filed 08/01/16 Entered 08/01/16 12:02:22 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2
Case 16-24677 Doc 6 Filed 08/01/16 Entered 08/01/16 12:02:22 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2
P.1 

OAR Box 1875 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

16) I I-E-34 

Docket Number: 

A-90-19 

Printed 12/1/2008 11:12:44 AM Sheet 16 of 86 
P.2 

„ A-90-19 

1 IX,D.v: * > • ll-E-34 

JAC A Corp . DEC 1 8 1992 

550 Pinetown Rd. 

';._..,_„— —» : „ Ft. Washington, PA 19034 

\ ErA/ur:_-^_„ . 215/643-5466 Fax: 215/643-2772 

% ' 

Project Name: HON 

Person Contacted/Title: 

Phone Number: 

Company 

Representing: 

JACA Representative: 

Discussion: I ca 

The 

Telephone Log 

Mark Grim 

1-914-357-2550 

Union Carbide 

Christopher Holmes 

lied Union Carbide to obtain 

price quoted for 50 percent 

dehyde was $5.60 per kilogram. 

• 

Date: 

Time: 

Project No.: 

Fax: 

*• s ^ 

Fehn.ary 7ft. 1QQ9 

014308 

Drice quotes for Gluteraldehvde. 

reaqent techn ical qrade qluteral-
# EUR-Lex - 12006E074 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12006E074

**Treaty establishing the European Community (consolidated version) - Part Three - Community policies - TITLE V - Transport - Article 74 **

*
Official Journal C 321 E , 29/12/2006 P. 0071 - 0071 Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0062 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0206 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0027 - Consolidated version (EEC Treaty - no official publication available) *

Article 74

Any measures taken within the framework of this Treaty in respect of transport rates and conditions shall take account of the economic circumstances of carriers.

--------------------------------------------------
#### Samuel J. Peacock, Respondent, *v.*Thomas Bailey, Appellant.

(Submitted April 17, 1907;

decided May 7, 1907.)

*Peacock*v. Bailey, 112 App. Div. 921, affirmed.

. Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered April 27, 1906, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action under section 1669 of the Code of Civil Procedure to recover for an alleged forcible eviction without process.

*George E. Miner*for appellant.

*Erederioh S. Lyhe*and *Graham Witsehief*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with-costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Werner,'Willard Bartlett and Hiscock, JJ.
§ 12.13 How is a declaration of forfeiture issued? ( a ) If the seizing agency commences a timely proceeding against property subject to administrative forfeiture, and either no valid and timely claim is filed or the seized property is not released in response to a petition or supplemental petition for remission, the Service or the Solicitor will declare the property forfeited to the United States for disposition according to law. The declaration of forfeiture will have the same force and effect as a final decree and order of forfeiture in a Federal judicial forfeiture proceeding.
( b ) The declaration of forfeiture will describe the property and state the date, time, place, and reason for the seizure of the property. The declaration of forfeiture will refer to the notice of seizure and proposed forfeiture and describe the dates and manner in which the notice of seizure and proposed forfeiture was sent to you. If we have no proof of delivery to you of the notice of seizure and proposed forfeiture, the declaration of forfeiture will describe the efforts made to deliver the notice of seizure and proposed forfeiture to you.
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Integrated Environmental Technologies, Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William E. Prince, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

|   | /s/William E. Prince |
|--------|----------------------|

|   | William E. Prince |
|--------|-------------------|

|   | Chief Executive Officer and |
|--------|-----------------------------|

|   | Principal Financial Officer |
|--------|-----------------------------|

|   | August 20, 2007 |
|--------|-----------------|
# EUR-Lex - 12002E188 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 12002E188

**Treaty establishing the European Community (Nice consolidated version) - Part Four: Association of the overseas countries and territories - Article 188 - Article 136a - EC Treaty (Maastricht consolidated version) - **

*
Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0113 - 0113 Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0259 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0055 - Consolidated version *

Treaty establishing the European Community (Nice consolidated version)

Part Four: Association of the overseas countries and territories

Article 188

Article 136a - EC Treaty (Maastricht consolidated version)

Article 188

The provisions of Articles 182 to 187 shall apply to Greenland, subject to the specific provisions for Greenland set out in the Protocol on special arrangements for Greenland, annexed to this Treaty.
Case 16-26126 Doc 10 Filed 08/18/16 Entered 08/19/16 09:15:58 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
# EUR-Lex - 12006E294 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12006E294

**Treaty establishing the European Community (consolidated version) - Part Six - General and final provisions - Article 294 **

*
Official Journal C 321 E , 29/12/2006 P. 0173 - 0173 Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0148 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0296 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0075 - Consolidated version (EEC Treaty - no official publication available) *

Article 294

Member States shall accord nationals of the other Member States the same treatment as their own nationals as regards participation in the capital of companies or firms within the meaning of Article 48, without prejudice to the application of the other provisions of this Treaty.

--------------------------------------------------
EXHIBIT 31.1: Rule 13a-14(a) Certifications





I, Wenge Fang, certify that:





1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of China Water Group, Inc. (the “Registrant”);




2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;




4.  The Registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Registrant and have:




a)     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this  report is being prepared;




b)     Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and




c)      Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and




5.  The Registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):




a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and




b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the smaller reporting Registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.




Date: December 27, 2011
/s/ Wenge FangWenge Fang, Chief Executive Officer
<R>CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of E-Com Technologies Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 15, 2003 (the "Report"), we, Kyle Werier, Principal Executive Officer and Ron Jorgensen, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of our knowledge and belief:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Dated: October 16, 2003

/s/ Kyle Werier	
Kyle Werier, President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)

/s/ Ron Jorgensen	
Ron Jorgensen, Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)</R>
# EUR-Lex - 12004V034 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V034

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART I - TITLE V — EXERCISE OF UNION COMPETENCE - CHAPTER I — COMMON PROVISIONS - Article I-34 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0027 - 0027 *

Article I-34

Legislative acts

1. European laws and framework laws shall be adopted, on the basis of proposals from the Commission, jointly by the European Parliament and the Council under the ordinary legislative procedure as set out in Article III-396. If the two institutions cannot reach agreement on an act, it shall not be adopted.

2. In the specific cases provided for in the Constitution, European laws and framework laws shall be adopted by the European Parliament with the participation of the Council, or by the latter with the participation of the European Parliament, in accordance with special legislative procedures.

3. In the specific cases provided for in the Constitution, European laws and framework laws may be adopted at the initiative of a group of Member States or of the European Parliament, on a recommendation from the European Central Bank or at the request of the Court of Justice or the European Investment Bank.

--------------------------------------------------
###### Editorial Note on [Part 1926](/current/title-29/part-1926?toc=1)

#### Editorial Notes:

1. At [44 FR 8577](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/44-FR-8577), Feb. 9, 1979, and corrected at [44 FR 20940](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/44-FR-20940), Apr. 6, 1979, OSHA reprinted without change the entire text of [29 CFR part 1926](/on/2024-09-23/title-29/part-1926) together with certain General Industry Occupational Safety and Health Standards contained in [29 CFR part 1910](/on/2024-09-23/title-29/part-1910), which have been identified as also applicable to construction work. This republication developed a single set of OSHA regulations for both labor and management forces within the construction industry.

2. Nomenclature changes to part 1926 appear at [84 FR 21597](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/84-FR-21597), May 14, 2019.

#### § 1926.59 Hazard communication.

Note:

The requirements applicable to construction work under this section are identical to those set forth at [§ 1910.1200 of this chapter](/on/2024-09-23/title-29/section-1910.1200).

[[61 FR 31431](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/61-FR-31431), June 20, 1996]
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4925 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 Union Calendar No. 441

103d CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4925

                          [Report No. 103-795]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To extend for one year the authority of the Bureau of Reclamation to 
        sell certain loans to the Redwood Valley Water District.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            October 3, 1994

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed

                                                 Union Calendar No. 441
103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4925

                          [Report No. 103-795]

 To extend for one year the authority of the Bureau of Reclamation to 
        sell certain loans to the Redwood Valley Water District.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 9, 1994

 Mr. Hamburg introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

                            October 3, 1994

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend for one year the authority of the Bureau of Reclamation to 
        sell certain loans to the Redwood Valley Water District.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That section 2404 of 
the Reclamation Projects Authorization and Adjustment Act of 1992 (106 
Stat. 4688) is amended by striking ``two'' and inserting ``three''.
```
# Map            The Caucasus and Central Asia.
H. R. 5176

One Hundred Third Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twenty-fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-four

An Act

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act relating to San Diego ocean

discharge and waste water reclamation.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ocean Pollution Reduction Act’’.

SEC. 2. SAN DIEGO OCEAN DISCHARGE AND WASTE WATER RECLAMATION.

Section 301(j) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33

U.S.C. 1311(j)) is amended—

(1) in paragraph (1)(A) by inserting before the semicolon

at the end the following: ‘‘, and except as provided in paragraph

(5)’’; and

(2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

‘‘(5) EXTENSION OF APPLICATION DEADLINE.—

‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—In the 180-day period beginning

on the date of the enactment of this paragraph, the city

of San Diego, California, may apply for a modification

pursuant to subsection (h) of the requirements of subsection

(b)(1)(B) with respect to biological oxygen demand and total

suspended solids in the effluent discharged into marine

waters.

‘‘(B) APPLICATION.—An application under this paragraph shall include a commitment by the applicant to

implement a waste water reclamation program that, at

a minimum, will—

‘‘(i) achieve a system capacity of 45,000,000 gallons

of reclaimed waste water per day by January 1, 2010;

and

‘‘(ii) result in a reduction in the quantity of suspended solids discharged by the applicant into the

marine environment during the period of the modification.

‘‘(C) ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS.—The Administrator may

not grant a modification pursuant to an application submitted under this paragraph unless the Administrator determines that such modification will result in removal of

not less than 58 percent of the biological oxygen demand

(on an annual average) and not less than 80 percent of

total suspended solids (on a monthly average) in the discharge to which the application applies.
H. R. 5176—2

‘‘(D) PRELIMINARY DECISION DEADLINE.—The Administrator shall announce a preliminary decision on an application submitted under this paragraph not later than 1 year

after the date the application is submitted.’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.