alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1211.230 Transition plans. ( a ) *Submission of plans.* An institution to which § 1211.225 applies and that is composed of more than one administratively separate unit may submit either a single transition plan applicable to all such units, or a separate transition plan applicable to each such unit.
( b ) *Content of plans.* In order to be approved by the Secretary of Education, a transition plan shall: ( 1 ) State the name, address, and Federal Interagency Committee on Education Code of the educational institution submitting such plan, the administratively separate units to which the plan is applicable, and the name, address, and telephone number of the person to whom questions concerning the plan may be addressed. The person who submits the plan shall be the chief administrator or president of the institution, or another individual legally authorized to bind the institution to all actions set forth in the plan.
( 2 ) State whether the educational institution or administratively separate unit admits students of both sexes as regular students and, if so, when it began to do so.
( 3 ) Identify and describe with respect to the educational institution or administratively separate unit any obstacles to admitting students without discrimination on the basis of sex.
( 4 ) Describe in detail the steps necessary to eliminate as soon as practicable each obstacle so identified and indicate the schedule for taking these steps and the individual directly responsible for their implementation.
( 5 ) Include estimates of the number of students, by sex, expected to apply for, be admitted to, and enter each class during the period covered by the plan.
( c ) *Nondiscrimination.* No policy or practice of a recipient to which § 1211.225 applies shall result in treatment of applicants to or students of such recipient in violation of §§ 1211.300 through 1211.310 unless such treatment is necessitated by an obstacle identified in paragraph (b)(3) of this section and a schedule for eliminating that obstacle has been provided as required by paragraph (b)(4) of this section.
( d ) *Effects of past exclusion.* To overcome the effects of past exclusion of students on the basis of sex, each educational institution to which § 1211.225 applies shall include in its transition plan, and shall implement, specific steps designed to encourage individuals of the previously excluded sex to apply for admission to such institution. Such steps shall include instituting recruitment programs that emphasize the institution's commitment to enrolling students of the sex previously excluded.
# EUR-Lex - 12004V087 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V087

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART II — THE CHARTER OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THE UNION - TITLE IV — SOLIDARITY - Article II-87 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0047 - 0047 *

Article II-87

Workers' right to information and consultation within the undertaking

Workers or their representatives must, at the appropriate levels, be guaranteed information and consultation in good time in the cases and under the conditions provided for by Union law and national laws and practices.

--------------------------------------------------
#### § 1208.102 Application.

This regulation (§§ 1208.101-1208.170) applies to all programs or activities conducted by the agency, except for programs or activities conducted outside the United States that do not involve individuals with handicaps in the United States.
# EUR-Lex - 12006E007 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12006E007

**Treaty establishing the European Community (consolidated version) - Part One - Principles - Article 7 **

*
Official Journal C 321 E , 29/12/2006 P. 0046 - 0046 Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0042 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0183 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0009 - Consolidated version (EEC Treaty - no official publication available) *

Article 7

1. The tasks entrusted to the Community shall be carried out by the following institutions:

- a EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT,

- a COUNCIL,

- a COMMISSION,

- a COURT OF JUSTICE,

- a COURT OF AUDITORS.

Each institution shall act within the limits of the powers conferred upon it by this Treaty.

2. The Council and the Commission shall be assisted by an Economic and Social Committee and a Committee of the Regions acting in an advisory capacity.

--------------------------------------------------
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 37347

STATE OF IDAHO ,
Plaintiff-Respondent ,

v.

ANTONIO VAQUERA ,
Defendant-Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2010 Unpublished Opinio n No. 637

Filed: September 9, 2010

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED OPINION AND SHALL NOT BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fifth Judicial District, Sta te of Idaho, Cassia County. Hon. Michael R. Crabtree , District Judge.

Order revoking probation and requiring execution of unified seven

- year sentence with two

- year determinate t erm for forgery

, affirmed

.
Molly J. Huskey, State Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming , Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.

________________________________________________ Before LANSING, Chief Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge;

and GRATTON, Judge

PER CURIAM
Antonio Vaquera pled guilty to forgery . Idaho Code § 18

- 3601 . The district court imposed a unified seven

- year sentence with a two

- year determinate term, but after a period of
retained jurisdiction, suspended the sentence and placed Vaquera on supervised probation.
Subseque ntly, Vaquera admitted to violating several terms of the probation, and the district court
consequently revoked probation and ordered execution of the original sentence. Vaquera appeals
contending that the district court abused its discretion by revoking his probation

. It is within the trial court’s discretion to revoke probation if any of the terms and
conditions of the probation have been violated. I.C. §§ 19

- 2603, 20

- 222; State v. Beckett , 122
Idaho 324, 325, 834 P.2d 326, 327 ( Ct. App. 1992); State v. Adams , 115 Idaho 1053, 1054, 772
P.2d 260, 261 (Ct. App. 1989); State v. Hass , 114 Idaho 554, 558, 758 P.2d 713, 717 (Ct. App.2

1988). In determining whether to revoke probation a court must examine whether the probation

is achievi ng the goal of rehabilitation and consistent with the protection of society. State v.
Upton , 127 Idaho 274, 275, 899 P.2d 984, 985 (Ct. App. 1995); Beckett , 122 Idaho at 325, 834
P.2d at 327; Hass , 114 Idaho at 558, 758 P.2d at 717. The court may, after a probation violation
has been established, order that the suspended sentence be executed or, in the alternative, the

court is authorized under Idaho Criminal Rule 35 to reduce the sentence. Beckett , 122 Idaho at
325, 834 P.2d at 327; State v. Marks , 116 Idaho 976, 977, 783 P.2d 315, 316 (Ct. App. 1989). A
decision to revoke probation will be disturbed on appeal only upon a showing that the trial court

abused its discretion. Beckett , 122 Idaho at 325, 834 P.2d at 327.
Applying the foregoing standar ds, and having reviewed the record in this case, we cannot
say that the distri ct court abused its discretion in revoking probation and ordering execution of
Vaquera ’s original sentence. Therefore, the order revoking probation and directing e xecution of
Vaquera ’s previously suspended sentence is affirmed.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Delta Regional Authority","provider_url":"https:\/\/dra.gov","author_name":"Aha! Creative","author_url":"https:\/\/dra.gov\/author\/admin\/","title":"Careers - Delta Regional Authority","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"S9T1TCobJ0\"><a href=\"https:\/\/dra.gov\/about\/careers\/\">Careers<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/dra.gov\/about\/careers\/embed\/#?secret=S9T1TCobJ0\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Careers” — Delta Regional Authority\" data-secret=\"S9T1TCobJ0\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"Careers The Delta Regional Authority (DRA) is collaborative federal-state agency that supports economic development for 252 counties and parishes within the lower Mississippi River (“the Delta”) and Alabama Black Belt. DRA’s mission is to create jobs, build communities, and improve the lives of the 10 million people living within the DRA footprint. DRA offers a […]"}
§ 600.925 NMFS EFH Conservation Recommendations to Federal and state agencies. ( a ) *General.* Under section 305(b)(4)(A) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, NMFS is required to provide EFH Conservation Recommendations to Federal and state agencies for actions that would adversely affect EFH. NMFS will not recommend that state or Federal agencies take actions beyond their statutory authority.
( b ) *Recommendations to Federal agencies.* For Federal actions, EFH Conservation Recommendations will be provided to Federal agencies as part of EFH consultations conducted pursuant to § 600.920. If NMFS becomes aware of a Federal action that would adversely affect EFH, but for which a Federal agency has not initiated an EFH consultation, NMFS may request that the Federal agency initiate EFH consultation, or NMFS will provide EFH Conservation Recommendations based on the information available.
( c ) *Recommendations to state agencies* — ( 1 ) *Establishment of procedures.* The Magnuson-Stevens Act does not require state agencies to consult with the Secretary regarding EFH. NMFS will use existing coordination procedures or establish new procedures to identify state actions that may adversely affect EFH, and to determine the most appropriate method for providing EFH Conservation Recommendations to state agencies.
( 2 ) *Coordination with states on recommendations to Federal agencies.* When an action that would adversely affect EFH is authorized, funded, or undertaken by both Federal and state agencies, NMFS will provide the appropriate state agencies with copies of EFH Conservation Recommendations developed as part of the Federal consultation procedures in § 600.920. NMFS will also seek agreements on sharing information and copies of recommendations with Federal or state agencies conducting similar consultation and recommendation processes to ensure coordination of such efforts.
( d ) *Coordination with Councils.* NMFS will coordinate with each Council to identify the types of actions on which Councils intend to comment pursuant to section 305(b)(3) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act. For such actions NMFS will share pertinent information with the Council, including copies of NMFS' EFH Conservation Recommendations.
EXHIBIT 5.1


                                                  January __, 2003

Biophan Technologies, Inc.
150 Lucius Gordon Drive, Suite 215
West Henrietta, NY  14586

    RE:    Biophan Technologies, Inc. - Registration Statement on Form
           SB-2

Gentlemen:

    We have acted as counsel to Biophan Technologies, Inc., a Nevada
corporation (hereinafter called the "Company"), in connection with its
Registration Statement on Form SB-2, filed under the Securities Act of
1933, relating to the proposed resale of up to 25,471,228 common shares
of the Company, $.001 par value ("Common Shares") by a Selling
Shareholder.

    In that connection, we have examined the Certificate of
Incorporation of the Company, as amended, the by-laws of the Company,
as amended, the Registration Statement, and such other documents and
corporate records as we have deemed necessary or appropriate for
purposes of this opinion.

    Based upon the foregoing, it is our opinion that:

    1. The Company has been duly organized and is a validly existing

    2. The corporation is in good standing under the laws of the State of
       Nevada.

    3. The Common Shares have been, or upon exercise of the various
       warrant agreements recited in the Registration Statement, will be, duly
       authorized, validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable.

    We hereby consent to the filing of this opinion as Exhibit 5.1 to
the above-referenced Registration Statement and to the reference made
to us under the caption "Legal Matters" in the Prospectus forming a
part of such Registration Statement.

    Very truly yours,

                                    BOYLAN, BROWN, CODE,
                                    VIGDOR & WILSON, LLP



                                    Alan S. Lockwood
ASL/slc
# EUR-Lex - 12008E070 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008E070

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - PART THREE: UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS - TITLE V: AREA OF FREEDOM, SECURITY AND JUSTICE - Chapter 1: General provisions - Article 70 **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0074 - 0074 *

Article 70

Without prejudice to Articles 258, 259 and 260, the Council may, on a proposal from the Commission, adopt measures laying down the arrangements whereby Member States, in collaboration with the Commission, conduct objective and impartial evaluation of the implementation of the Union policies referred to in this Title by Member States' authorities, in particular in order to facilitate full application of the principle of mutual recognition. The European Parliament and national Parliaments shall be informed of the content and results of the evaluation.

--------------------------------------------------
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         196,681
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  690,346
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,082,377
<PP&E>                                       1,008,938
<DEPRECIATION>                               (296,456)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,948,279
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          191,810
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       554,942
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,201,527
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,948,279
<SALES>                                      2,346,610
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,346,610
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,984,485
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                362,125
<INCOME-TAX>                                   147,767
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            214,358
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   214,358
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .03
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 195 (Tuesday, October 10, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 59523-59524]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-8539]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Reclamation


Third Public Meeting for Reclamation's Managing for Excellence 
Project

AGENCY: Bureau of Reclamation, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of a public meeting and announcement of subsequent 
meetings to be held.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Reclamation is holding a meeting to inform the 
public about the Managing for Excellence project. This meeting is the 
third of three previously noticed meetings to be held in 2006 to inform 
the public about the action items, progress, and results of the 
Managing for Excellence project and to seek broad feedback. Subsequent 
meetings will be held in 2007.

DATES: November 13, 2006, 1 p.m. to 6 p.m., and November 14, 2006, 8 
a.m. to 5 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Doubletree Hotel Sacramento, 2001 Point West Way, 
Sacramento, California 95815, Garden and Terrace Rooms.

[[Page 59524]]


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Miguel Rocha (303) 445-2841.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Managing for Excellence Project will 
identify and address the specific 21st Century challenges Reclamation 
must meet to fulfill its mission to manage, develop, and protect water 
and related resources in an environmentally and economically sound 
manner in the interest of the American public. This project will 
examine Reclamation's core capabilities and the agency's ability to 
respond to both expected and unforeseeable future needs in an 
innovative and timely manner. This project will result in essential 
changes in a number of key areas, which are outlined in, Managing for 
Excellence--An Action Plan for the 21st Century Bureau of Reclamation. 
For more information regarding the Project, Action Plan, and specific 
actions being taken, please visit the Managing for Excellence Web page 
at http://www.usbr.gov/excellence.

Registration

    Although you may register the first day of the conference starting 
at 10 a.m., we highly encourage you to register online at http://www.usbr.gov/excellence, or by phone at 303-445-2808.

    Dated: September 27, 2006.
Brenda W. Burman,
Deputy Commissioner--External and Intergovernmental Affairs.
[FR Doc. 06-8539 Filed 10-6-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-MN-M
# EUR-Lex - 11985I187 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11985I187

**DOCUMENTS CONCERNING THE ACCESSION OF THE KINGDOM OF SPAIN AND THE PORTUGUESE REPUBLIC TO THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, ACT CONCERNING THE CONDITIONS OF ACCESSION OF THE KINGDOM OF SPAIN AND THE PORTUGUESE REPUBLIC AND THE ADJUSTMENTS TO THE TREATIES, ARTICLE 187 **

*
Official Journal L 302 , 15/11/1985 P. 0080 *

++++

Article 187

The amount of duties recorded under own resources accruing from value added tax shall be due in its entirety from 1 January 1986 .

That amount shall be calculated and checked as if the Canary Islands and Ceuta and Melilla were included in the territorial field of application of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonization of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes - Common system of value added tax : uniform basis of assessment .

The Community shall refund to the Kingdom of Spain , as an item of expenditure under the general budget of the European Communities , during the month following its availability to the Commission , a proportion of the amount of payments under own resources accruing from value added tax in accordance with the following procedure :

- 87 % in 1986 ,

- 70 % in 1987 ,

- 55 % in 1988 ,

- 40 % in 1989 ,

- 25 % in 1990 ,

- 5 % in 1991 .

The percentage of this graduated refund shall not apply to the amount corresponding to the share to be borne by Spain in financing the deduction provided for in Article 3 ( 3 ) ( b ) and ( c ) of the Council Decision of 7 May 1985 on the Communities' system of own resources , in favour of the United Kingdom .
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

BILLY TYNER,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D18-2215

[October 18, 2018]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Bernard I. Bober, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 10-434CF10A.

Billy Tyner, Arcadia, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, DAMOORGIAN and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 5362 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 5362

To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 regarding the application 
 of wage and hour provisions to minor league baseball players, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 20, 2024

  Mr. Durbin (for himself, Mr. Blumenthal, Mr. Murphy, Mr. Welch, Mr. 
 Wyden, and Mr. Hickenlooper) introduced the following bill; which was 
 read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, 
                              and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 regarding the application 
 of wage and hour provisions to minor league baseball players, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Fair Ball Act''.

SEC. 2. APPLICATION OF THE FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT OF 1938 TO MINOR 
              LEAGUE BASEBALL PLAYERS.

    Section 13(a)(19) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 
U.S.C. 213(a)(19)) is amended by striking ``a contract'' and all that 
follows through the period at the end and inserting ``an unexpired 
collective bargaining agreement.''.
                                 <all>
```