alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. R. 4205

One Hundred Third Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twenty-fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-four

An Act

To amend title 11, D.C. Code, to clarify that blind individuals are eligible to

serve as jurors in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF ELIGIBILITY OF BLIND INDIVIDUALS

TO SERVE AS JURORS IN DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.

Section 11–1906(b), D.C. Code, is amended by adding at the

end the following new paragraph: ‘‘(4) An individual who is blind may not be disqualified from

serving as a juror solely on the basis of blindness, but may be

disqualified from serving as a juror in a particular case if the

individual’s blindness makes the individual incapable of rendering

satisfactory jury service in that case.’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
EXHIBIT
31.1








CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO


SECTION
302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,Jason Smart, certify
that:





1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Medical Makeover Corporation of
America;





2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;





3.  Based  on
my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;





4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer  and  I  are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and we have:





a.  designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or
caused  such disclosure  controls and  procedures
to be designed  under our  supervision,  to ensure
that  material  information  relating to
the  registrant,  including  its consolidated
subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;


b.
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions  about the
effectiveness of the disclosure  controls and
procedures,  as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly
report based on such evaluation; and


c.
disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over  financial  reporting  that
occurred  during the  registrant's  most recent
fiscal  quarter  that  has  materially  affected,  or
is  reasonably  likely  to materially affect, the
registrant's  internal control over financial  reporting;
and





5. I
have  disclosed,  based on our most
recent  evaluation of internal  control over financial
reporting,  to the registrant's  auditors and the audit
committee of the  registrant's  board of directors (or
persons  performing  the equivalent functions):





a.
all significant  deficiencies  and
material  weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal  control
over  financial  reporting,  which are reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and


b.
any fraud,  whether or not material,  that
involves  management or other employees who have a significant role in
the registrant's  internal control over financial
reporting.





Date:
November 12, 2009





/s/ Jason Smart


Jason
Smart


Chief Executive
Officer
TS-EMLA10/20/30

Attachment #4

Pt. 2, Sec. A, 1d

Manufacturing and Processing Information on the New Chemical Substances at

Industrial Sites Controlled by the SubmitterTS-EMLA10/20/30Attachment #4

Manufacturing and Processing Information on the New Chemical

Substances at Industrial Sites Controlled by the Submitter – Manufacture

of Adhesion Promoters (LAS) and Emulsifiers TS-EMLA10/20/30Attachment #4

Manufacturing and Processing Information on the New Chemical

Substances at Industrial Sites Controlled by the Submitter – Processing of Emulsifiers TS-EMLA10/20/30
# EUR-Lex - 12004V254 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V254

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART III — THE POLICIES AND FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - TITLE III — INTERNAL POLICIES AND ACTION - CHAPTER III — POLICIES IN OTHER AREAS - Section 9 — Research and Technological Development, and Space - Article III-254 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0111 - 0112 *

Article III-254

1. To promote scientific and technical progress, industrial competitiveness and the implementation of its policies, the Union shall draw up a European space policy. To this end, it may promote joint initiatives, support research and technological development and coordinate the efforts needed for the exploration and exploitation of space.

2. To contribute to attaining the objectives referred to in paragraph 1, European laws or framework laws shall establish the necessary measures, which may take the form of a European space programme.

3. The Union shall establish any appropriate relations with the European Space Agency.

--------------------------------------------------
EXHIBIT 1

Case 16-00523 Doc 5-1 Filed 09/09/16 Entered 09/09/16 11:17:27 Desc Exhibit

Exhibit 1 Page 1 of 4
Nuance Power PDF Trial

www.nuance.com

Case 16-00523 Doc 5-1 Filed 09/09/16 Entered 09/09/16 11:17:27 Desc Exhibit

Exhibit 1 Page 2 of 4
Nuance Power PDF Trial

www.nuance.com

Case 16-00523 Doc 5-1 Filed 09/09/16 Entered 09/09/16 11:17:27 Desc Exhibit

Exhibit 1 Page 3 of 4
Nuance Power PDF Trial

www.nuance.com

Case 16-00523 Doc 5-1 Filed 09/09/16 Entered 09/09/16 11:17:27 Desc Exhibit

Exhibit 1 Page 4 of 4
# EUR-Lex - 12006E089 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12006E089

**Treaty establishing the European Community (consolidated version) - Part Three - Community policies - TITLE VI - Common rules on competition, taxation and approximation of laws - Chapter 2 - Tax provisions - Article 89 **

*
Official Journal C 321 E , 29/12/2006 P. 0078 - 0078 Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0068 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0212 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0031 - Consolidated version (EEC Treaty - no official publication available) *

Article 89

The Council, acting by a qualified majority on a proposal from the Commission and after consulting the European Parliament, may make any appropriate regulations for the application of Articles 87 and 88 and may in particular determine the conditions in which Article 88(3) shall apply and the categories of aid exempted from this procedure.

--------------------------------------------------
Webinar Attendees: Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards for Standby Mode and Off Mode for Microwave Ovens Meeting Meeting Date: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 Name Title Organization Street City State Zip Phone Fax Email Baker, David Counsel, GR and Regulatory Compliance GE AP2-222 Louisville KY40225 N/A N/A david.baker2@ge.com Ballo, Timothy Associate Attorney Earthjustice 1625 Massachusetts Avenue NW Suite 702 Washington DC20036202-667-4500 202-667-2356 tballo@earthjustice.org Fassler, Richard S Manager, Energy Efficiency Programs Power Integrations 5245 Hellyer Avenue San Jose CA95138408-963-1816 408-414-8973 rfassler@powerint.com Gracki, John Senior Engineer Samsung Electronics 935 National Parkway Schaumburg IL 60173 N/A N/A jgracki@sea.samsung.com Johnson, Christopher Sr. Manager, Standards & Compliance LG Electronics USA, Inc 1000 Sylvan Ave Englewood Cliffs NJ 07632201-266-2419 N/A chris.johnson@lge.com Kline, Kelley Global Product Stewardship Program Manager GE Appliance Park, AP35-1104Louisville KY40056502-452-7603 N/A kelley.kline@ge.com Nsofor, Kenneth Senior Consultant Navigant Consulting 77 S. Bedford Street Suite 400 Burlington MA01803781-270-8338 N/A kenneth.nsofor@navigantconsulting.com Petruska, Steve Senior Product Safety Engineer Sharp Electronics Corporation One Sharp Plaza Mahwah NJ 07495 N/A N/A spetrusk@sharpsec.com Polinski, Steve Senior Manager Regulatory Affairs Miele, Inc. 9 Independence Way Princeton NJ 08540 609-419-9898 609-419-0147 spolinski@mieleusa.com Polley, Nolan Lead Engineer, Food Preparation Controls - North American Region Whirlpool Corporation 451 Renaissance Drive Saint Joseph MI 49085 N/A N/A nolan_a_polley@whirlpool.com Vazquez, George Engineer Panasonic 5201 Tollview Drive Rolling Meadows IL 60008 N/A N/A george.vazquez.@us.panasonic.com Williams, Yoolanda Program Manager - Regulatory and Compliance General Electric AP2-126, Appliance Park Louisville KY40225 N/A N/A yoolanda.williams@ge.com Yamashita, Sei Manager Panasonic 5201 Tollview Dr Rolling Meadows IL 60008 N/A N/A sei.yamashita@us.panasonic.com
# EUR-Lex - 12007L/AFI/DCL/13 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12007L/AFI/DCL/13

**Treaty of Lisbon amending the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Community, signed at Lisbon, 13 December 2007 - A. Declarations concerning provisions of the Treaties - 13. Declaration concerning the common foreign and security policy **

*
Official Journal 306 , 17/12/2007 P. 0255 - 0255 *

13. Declaration concerning the common foreign and security policy

The Conference underlines that the provisions in the Treaty on European Union covering the Common Foreign and Security Policy, including the creation of the office of High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy and the establishment of an External Action Service, do not affect the responsibilities of the Member States, as they currently exist, for the formulation and conduct of their foreign policy nor of their national representation in third countries and international organisations.

The Conference also recalls that the provisions governing the Common Security and Defence Policy do not prejudice the specific character of the security and defence policy of the Member States.

It stresses that the European Union and its Member States will remain bound by the provisions of the Charter of the United Nations and, in particular, by the primary responsibility of the Security Council and of its Members for the maintenance of international peace and security.

--------------------------------------------------
U.S. Department of Justice

Office of Community Oriented Policing Services

 Fact Sheet www.cops.usdoj.gov

2016 Community Policing Development Program

Community Policing Development (CPD) funds are 

used to advance the practice of community policing in 

law enforcement agencies through training and technical 

assistance and the development of innovative community 

policing strategies, applied research, guidebooks, and best 

practices that are national in scope and responsive to the 

solicitation topic requirements.

COPS Community Policing 

Development Awards 

The 2016 CPD Program fundedprojects related to a number 

of public safety topic areas, including the following:

 Microgrant Initiative for Law Enforcement 

 Critical Response Technical Assistance

 Community Policing Emerging Issues Forums

 Law Enforcement Led 21st Century Policing 

Demonstration Projects

 21st Century Policing Implementation Projects

 Community Policing Training Projects

The full listing of awarded projects is located on the 

COPS Office website. 

Funding Provisions

In FY 2016, the COPS Office awarded nearly $7.5 million 

under the CPD program.

Provisions include the following:

 The CPD solicitation was open to all public 

governmental agencies, profit and nonprofit institutions, 

institutions of higher education, community groups, 

and faith-based organizations. Accepted proposals 

were designed to innovatively advance the field, were 

cost effective in their approach, and demonstrated an 

understanding of the principles of community policing 

and law enforcement.

 Most awards are two years (24 months) in duration, 

and there is no local match. Microgrants are one year 

(12 months) in duration, and there is also no local match. 

Contact the COPS Office

For more information about the Community Policing 

Development Program, please call the COPS Office 

Response Center at 800-421-6770 or visit the COPS 

Office online at www.cops.usdoj.gov.

ADDITIONAL RESOURCES

President’s Task Force on 21st Century Policing. 2015. Final Report of the President’s Task Force on 21st Century Policing. 

Washington, DC: Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.

http://www.cops.usdoj.gov/pdf/taskforce/TaskForce_FinalReport.pdf.

COPS Office Community Policing Development: http://cops.usdoj.gov/Default.asp?item=2450.

2016 COPS Community Policing Development (CPD) Program Award Owner's Manual: http://www.cops.usdoj.gov/

pdf/2016AwardDocs/cpd/2016_CPD_AOM.pdf.

October 2016
#### § 1150.47 Disposition of motions and petitions.

The judge may not sustain or grant a written motion or petition prior to expiration of the time for filing responses, but may overrule or deny such motion or petition without awaiting response, *Providing however,* That prehearing conferences, hearings, and decisions need not be delayed pending disposition of motions or petitions. All motions and petitions may be ruled upon immediately after reply. Motions and petitions not disposed of in separate rulings or in decisions will be deemed denied.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED NOVEMBER 13, 2014

NO. 03-14-00657-CR

Frank Fitzgerald, III, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 264TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES ROSE AND GOODWIN

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION-- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE JONES

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed 

the record, it appears that the Court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal. Therefore, the Court 

dismisses the appeal for want of jurisdiction. The appellant shall pay all costs relating to this 

appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.
§ 1223.1 What are the authorities for Part 1223? ( a ) The authorities for this part are 44 U.S.C. 3101; Executive Orders 12656, Assignment of Emergency Preparedness Responsibilities, and 13231, Critical Infrastructure Protection in the Information Age; and National Security Presidential Directive (NSPD 51)/Homeland Security Presidential Directive (HSPD-20) or applicable successor directives. These authorities require the head of each agency to make and preserve records that contain adequate and proper documentation of the organization and to perform national security emergency preparedness functions.
( b ) These regulations are in conformance with guidance provided in Federal Continuity Directive (FCD) 1, Federal Executive Branch National Continuity Program and Requirements, and FCD 2, Federal Executive Branch Mission Essential Function and Primary Mission Essential Function Identification and Submission Process.
#### § 1150.6 Suspension of rules.

Upon notice to all parties, the judge, with respect to matters pending before him/her, may modify or waive any rule in these regulations upon determination that no party will be unduly prejudiced and that the end of justice will be served.
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 190 (Monday, October 2, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 57982]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-8412]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health; Notice of 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(a) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of a meeting of 
the Office of AIDS Research Advisory Council.
    The meeting will be open to the public, with attendance limited to 
space available. Individuals who plan to attend and need special 
assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable le 
accommodations, should notify the Contact Person listed below in 
advance of the meeting.

    Name of Committee: Office of AIDS Research Advisory Council.
    Date: October 25, 2006.
    Time: 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: A Report of the Director addressing OAR initiatives. The 
topic of the meeting will focus on the newly restructured NIH-
Sponsored AIDS Clinical Trials Networks as a national resource.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, Terrace 
Level Conference Center, Rockville, MD 20852.
    Contact Person: Christina Brackna, Executive Secretary, Office 
of Aids Research, Office of the Director, NIH, 2 Center Drive, MSC 
0255, Building 2, Room 4W15, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 402-3555, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d1b2bce4e2a791bfb8b9ffb6bea7"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0d6e60383e7b4d636465236a627b">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Any interested person may file written comments with the 
committee by forwarding the statement to the Contact Person listed 
on this notice. The statement should include the name, address, 
telephone number and when applicable, the business or professional 
affiliation of the interested person.
    Information is also available on the Institute's/Center's home 
page: http://www.nih.gov/od/oar/index.htm, where an agenda and any 
additional information for the meeting will be posted when 
available.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.14, 
Intramural Research Training Award; 93.22, Clinical Research Loan 
Repayment Program for Individuals from Disadvantaged Backgrounds; 
93.232, Loan Repayment Program for Research Generally; 93.39, 
Academic Research Enhancement Award; 93.936, NIH Acquired 
Immunodeficiency Syndrome Research Loan Repayment Program;93.187, 
Undergraduate Scholarship Program for Individuals from Disadvantaged 
Backgrounds, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 25, 2006.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 06-8412 Filed 9-29-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
1 The Honorable Stephen M. Reasoner, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Jerry W. Cavaneau, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District ___________ No. 94-3732

___________ Willie Houston, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Larry Norris, Acting Director, * Eastern District of Arkansas. Arkansas Department of * [UNPUBLISHED] Correction, * * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: January 7, 1996 Filed: February 13, 1996

___________ Before FAGG, BOWMAN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM.
In 1988, a jury found Willie Houston guilty of first degree murder. The Arkansas Supreme Court affirmed his conviction, Houston v. State , 771 S.W.2d 16 (Ark. 1989), and denied postconviction relief, Houston v. State , No. CR 88-194 (Ark. Dec. 10, 1990) (unpublished per curiam). In 1992, Houston filed this 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition, asserting that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to move for a directed verdict at the close of the case and to object to jury instructions; the trial court should have granted his motion to suppress evidence allegedly seized in violation of the Fourth Amendment; and his conviction was based on insufficient evidence. The district court 1dismissed theof Arkansas.
-2- petition, and Houston appeals.
We conclude the district court correctly determined Houston's ineffective-assistance claims were procedurally barred, and Houston did not establish cause and prejudice to excuse his default. See Flieger v. Delo , 16 F.3d 878, 884-85 (8th Cir.), cert. denied , 115 S. Ct. 355 (1994); Smith v. Murray , 477 U.S. 527, 535-36 (1986); Johnson v. Lockhart , 944 F.2d 388, 390 (8th Cir. 1991). The district court also properly rejected Houston's Fourth Amendment claim, see Stone v. Powell , 428 U.S. 465, 494 (1976); Willett v. Lockhart , 37 F.3d 1265, 1268-69 (8th Cir. 1994) (en banc), cert. denied , 115 S. Ct. 1432 (1995), as well as his sufficiency-of-the-evidence claim, seeBecker v. Lockhart , 971 F.2d 172, 175 (8th Cir. 1992), cert. denied , 114 S. Ct. 98 (1993); Ark. Code Ann. §§ 5-10-102(a)(2), 5-2-202(1); Furr v. State , 822 S.W.2d 380, 381 (Ark. 1992).
Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Form ntcdsm

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

Northern District of Illinois

Eastern Division

219 S Dearborn

7th Floor

Chicago, IL 60604

Case No.: 16−28736

Chapter: 13

Judge: Timothy A. Barnes

In Re:

Uconer S Sims

3854 West Division St.

Chicago, IL 60651

Social Security / Individual Taxpayer ID No.:

xxx−xx−2968

Employer Tax ID / Other nos.:

NOTICE OF DISMISSAL

You are hereby notified that an Order Dismissing the above case was entered on November 10, 2016

FOR THE COURT

Dated: November 14, 2016 Jeffrey P. Allsteadt , Clerk

United States Bankruptcy Court

Case 16-28736 Doc 20-1 Filed 11/10/16 Entered 11/10/16 16:09:28 Desc Notice

 of Dismissal Page 1 of 1
| Census 2000 Gateway  |  	Glossary |
|---------------------------------------------|
|                                             |

|  | Summary File 4 (SF 4) |
|--|-----------------------|

Summary File 4 (SF4) contains the sample data,                     which is the information compiled from the questions asked                     of a sample of all people and housing units.

The sample data are presented in 213 population tables (matrices)                     and 110 housing tables, identified with "PCT" and "HCT", respectively.                     Each table is iterated for 336 population groups: the total                     population, 132 race groups, 78 American Indian and Alaska                     Native tribe categories (reflecting 39 individual tribes),                     39 Hispanic or Latino groups, and 86 ancestry groups.

 SF 4 is released as individual files for each of the 50                     states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico; and for                     the United States. The tables (matrices) are identical for                     all files, but the geographic coverage differs. Data are provided                     down to the census tract level.

Data:  Access to all tables and maps in American FactFinderPurchase Products:   Summary Files             for sale through Customer Services CenterProduct Support:  Summary File             4 Disc Product SupportFTP Download:  All             Files       FTP Read me (MSWord             | Text) Documentation:  
Technical Documentation               [PDF] (5M)               - Comparing               SF 3 Estimates with Corresponding Values in SF 1 and SF 2              -               Same-Sex Unmarried Partner Data from the 1990 and 2000 CensusesRelease dates

 

*Source: U.S. Census BureauPublic Information Office(301) 763-3030Author: **pio@census.gov***Last Revised: June 15, 2004 at 12:14:02 PMCensus Bureau Links:   Home·Census 2000·Subjects A to Z·Search·Data Tools·Catalog·Quality·Privacy Policy·Policies·FOIA·Contact Us