alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EUR-Lex - 12005SPN06/04/A - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12005SPN06/04/A

**Protocol concerning the conditions and arrangements for admission of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania to the European Union - Annex VI:List referred to in Article 20 of the Protocol: transitional measures, Bulgaria - 4.Agriculture - A.Agricultural legislation **

*
Official Journal L 157 , 21/06/2005 P. 0109 - 0109 *

A. AGRICULTURAL LEGISLATION

31997 R 2597: Council Regulation (EC) No 2597/97 of 18 December 1997 laying down additional rules on the common organization of the market in milk and milk products for drinking milk (OJ L 351, 23.12.1997, p. 13), as last amended by:

- 31999 R 1602: Council Regulation (EC) No 1602/1999 of 19.7.1999 (OJ L 189, 22.7.1999, p. 43).

By way of derogation from Article 3(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 2597/97, the requirements relating to fat content shall not apply to drinking milk produced in Bulgaria until 30 April 2009, in that milk with a fat content of 3 % (m/m) may be marketed as whole milk, and milk with a fat content of 2 % (m/m) may be marketed as semi‐skimmed milk. Drinking milk which does not comply with the requirements relating to fat content may be marketed only in Bulgaria or exported to third countries.

--------------------------------------------------
# EUR-Lex - 12006E/APP/02 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12006E/APP/02

**Amendments to Primary Legislation further to the Accession of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania to the European Union - II. Treaty establishing the European Community **

*
Official Journal C 321 E , 29/12/2006 P. 0327 - 0329 *

AMENDMENTS TO PRIMARY LEGISLATION FURTHER TO THE ACCESSION OF THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA AND ROMANIA TO THE EUROPEAN UNION

Further to the entry in force of the Treaty concerning the accession of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania to the European Union, the following articles shall be amended as set out below.

II. TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY

1. The last sentence of Article 57(1) shall be replaced by the following:

"In respect of restrictions existing under national law in Bulgaria, Estonia and Hungary, the relevant date shall be 31 December 1999."

2. The second paragraph of Article 189 shall be replaced by the following:

"The number of Members of the European Parliament shall not exceed 736."

3. With effect from the start of the 2009-2014 term, in Article 190(2) the first subparagraph shall be replaced by the following:

"2. The number of representatives elected in each Member State shall be as follows:

Belgium | 22 |

Bulgaria | 17 |

Czech Republic | 22 |

Denmark | 13 |

Germany | 99 |

Estonia | 6 |

Greece | 22 |

Spain | 50 |

France | 72 |

Ireland | 12 |

Italy | 72 |

Cyprus | 6 |

Latvia | 8 |

Lithuania | 12 |

Luxembourg | 6 |

Hungary | 22 |

Malta | 5 |

Netherlands | 25 |

Austria | 17 |

Poland | 50 |

Portugal | 22 |

Romania | 33 |

Slovenia | 7 |

Slovakia | 13 |

Finland | 13 |

Sweden | 18 |

United Kingdom | 72." |

4. In Article 205(2), the following shall be inserted in the first subparagraph:

"Bulgaria | 10 |

Romania | 14". |

5. In Article 205(2), the second and third subparagraphs shall be replaced by the following:

"Acts of the Council shall require for their adoption at least 255 votes in favour cast by a majority of the members where this Treaty requires them to be adopted on a proposal from the Commission.

In other cases, for their adoption acts of the Council shall require at least 255 votes in favour, cast by at least two-thirds of the members."

6. In Article 258, the following shall be inserted in the second subparagraph:

"Bulgaria | 12 |

Romania | 15". |

7. In Article 263, the following shall be inserted in the third subparagraph:

"Bulgaria | 12 |

Romania | 15". |

8. In Article 299(1), the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania shall be inserted in the list of Member States.

9. The second paragraph of Article 314 shall be replaced by the following:

"Pursuant to the Accession Treaties, the Bulgarian, Czech, Danish, English, Estonian, Finnish, Greek, Hungarian, Irish, Latvian, Lithuanian, Maltese, Polish, Portuguese, Romanian, Slovak, Slovenian, Spanish and Swedish versions of this Treaty shall also be authentic."

--------------------------------------------------
#### § 458.51 Inspection of records and questioning.

In connection with such investigation the Chief, DOE or a District Director or his representative may inspect such records and question such persons as he may deem necessary to enable him to determine the relevant facts. Every labor organization, its officers, employees, agents, or representatives shall cooperate fully in any investigation and shall testify and produce the records or other documents requested in connection with the investigation. This section shall be enforced in accordance with the procedures in §§ 458.66 through 458.92.

[45 FR 15158, Mar. 7, 1980. Redesignated and amended at 50 FR 31311, 31312, Aug. 1, 1985; 59 FR 15117, Mar. 31, 1994; 62 FR 6094, Feb. 10, 1997]
<PAGE>   1
                                                                EXHIBIT 11.1

HOLLINGER INTERNATIONAL INC.
COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                     Year Ended December 31,
                                               --------------------------------
                                                 1996        1995        1994
                                               --------    --------    --------
<S>                                            <C>          <C>         <C>
Average shares outstanding                      82,799      56,956       53,980
                                               =======     =======     ========
Earnings before extraordinary item             $33,813     $ 6,202     $102,772
Extraordinary loss on debt extinguishments      (2,150)         --           --
                                               -------     -------     --------
Net earnings                                    31,663       6,202      102,772

Preferred dividends                              1,087         271           --
                                               -------     -------     --------
Net earnings applicable to common shareholders $30,576     $ 5,931     $102,772
                                               =======     =======     ========

Earnings per common share
  Earnings before extraordinary item           $  0.40     $  0.11     $   1.90
  Extraordinary loss                             (0.03)         --           --
                                               -------     -------     --------
  Net Earnings                                 $  0.37     $  0.11     $   1.90
                                               =======     =======     ========
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Medical Makeover  Corporation of
America (the  "Company")  on Form 10-Q for the quarter  ending March 31, 2004 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Periodic Report"), I, Dr. Leonard I. Weinstein,  Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18.U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Periodic  Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information  contained in the Periodic Report fairly  presents,  in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.




/s/ DR. LEONARD I. WEINSTEIN
--------------------------------------
Dr. Leonard I. Weinstein
Chief Executive Officer

Date: May 17, 2004



     A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been  provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and  furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1
 
 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
 I, William S. Rosenstadt, Chief Executive Officer, President and Acting Principal Accounting Officer of Lone Pine Holdings, Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:
 
 (1)           the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended  September 30, 2009 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 (2)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 Date: November 16, 2009
 
 /s/  William S. Rosenstadt
 Name: William S. Rosenstadt
 Title: CEO, President and Principal Accounting Officer
Exhibit
      32.2




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**




**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
      2002**




I,
      Robert
      J. Wood, Chief Financial Officer of Biophan Technologies, Inc. (the "Company"),
      certify to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the Quarterly Report
      on Form 10-Q for the period ended May 31, 2008 of the Company,
      that:




(1)
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)
      the
      information contained in the Report, fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
              July
              14, 2008By:
            /s/
                Robert J. WoodName:
                Robert J. WoodTitle:
                Chief Financial Officer
## S IXTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
Case No. 6D 20 2 3

- 0968 Lower Tribunal No. 20

- CF

- 000348

_____________________________
J ONATHAN I SRAEL C OLON , Appellant
,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee

.

_____________________________ Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lee County

. Nicholas Thompson , Judge.

July 23, 2024

PER CURIAM

.

AFFIRMED

.

WOZNIAK
, BROWNLEE and GANNAM , JJ., c oncur.

Christopher E. Cosden, Fort Myers, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Krystle Celine Cacci, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-6037

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DARIUS LATRON CHANEY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at 

Charlotte. Max O. Cogburn, Jr., District Judge. (3:03-cr-00040-MOC-1; 3:16-cv-00424-

MOC)

Submitted: April 19, 2023 Decided: June 8, 2023

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and NIEMEYER and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joshua B. Carpenter, FEDERAL DEFENDERS OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA, 

INC., Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellant. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United 

States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North 

Carolina, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 19-6037 Doc: 28 Filed: 06/08/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Darius Latron Chaney seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying as untimely 

his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion.∗

 See Whiteside v. United States, 775 F.3d 180, 182-83 (4th 

Cir. 2014) (en banc) (explaining that § 2255 motions are subject to one-year statute of 

limitations, running from latest of four commencement dates enumerated in 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2255(f)). The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate 

of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B). A certificate of appealability will not issue 

absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(2). When, as here, the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the 

prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that 

the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. 

Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)).

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Chaney has not made 

the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Chaney’s motion for a certificate of 

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

∗ We held this case in abeyance for this court’s decision in United States v. 

Littlejohn, No. 19-6089, which presented the same argument related to the dispositive 

timeliness issue implicated here. See United States v. Littlejohn, No. 19-6089, 2023 WL 

1859911 (4th Cir. Feb. 9, 2023). Upon the issuance of the mandate in Littlejohn, this appeal 

was removed from abeyance and is ripe for disposition. 

USCA4 Appeal: 19-6037 Doc: 28 Filed: 06/08/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF, v. ROGERS & SHELDON, INC., DEFENDANT.

Morris County Court Law Division

October 18, 1951

*81
      *Mr. Oscar F. Laurie,*Assistant County Prosecutor, Morris County, attorney for plaintiff.

*Mr. John H. Grossman,*attorney for defendant.

Barrett, J. C. C.

The defendant appealed from a conviction in the Municipal Court of Parsippany-Troy Hills Township on a charge of violating *B. 8.*39 :3—84.3. The testimony indicates that on February 14, 1951, defendant’s truck and load was weighed by a state trooper. The load actually weighed 27,420 pounds and the certificate of registration for defendant’s truck permitted 25,400 pounds which indicated an overload of 2,020 pounds.

The statute provides that “No arrest shall be made in cases where weight limitations provided in this section are not exceeded by more than 5 *per*centum.” Allowing five per cent of the weight limitation of .25,400, as provided by the statute, an overload of 750 pounds still existed.

The defendant argued that the scales were or might have been inaccurate at the time the weighing took place. The testimony does not indicate that the scales were inaccurate.

The defendant argues that the five per cent allowance made by the statute was to allow an owner or operator of a truck a grace poundage, and that the owner or operator was to be allowed an additional amount of poundage over and in addition to the five per cent to provide for inaccuracy of scales or for any other purpose. As heretofore stated, the proof was not sufficient to indicate inaccuracy in the scales used, but even if it did, it is the opinion of this court that *82the five per cent provision in the statute is to take care of such inaccuracies. If the Legislature meant to provide that the five per cent provision in the statute was to only grant a grace poundage, it is the opinion of this court that the statute would so state.

This court cannot consider whether the defendant was a flagrant or minor violator. The only question to be determined is:—Did the defendant violate the statute P

The defendant is found guilty of violating *R. 8.*39 :3-84.3. A fine of $200 is imposed, together with the costs in the Municipal Court and the costs of this proceeding.
§ 1201.51 How will NARA request that my debt to NARA be collected by offset against some payment that another Federal agency owes me? The Archivist may request that funds due and payable to you by another Federal agency instead be paid to NARA to satisfy a debt you owe to NARA. NARA will refer debts to the Treasury for centralized administrative offset in accordance with the FCCS and the procedures established by the Treasury. Where centralized offset is not available or appropriate, NARA may request offset directly from the Federal agency that is holding funds for you. In requesting administrative offset, NARA will certify in writing to the Federal agency that is holding funds for you: ( a ) That you owe the debt;
( b ) The amount and basis of the debt; and
( c ) That NARA has complied with the requirements of 31 U.S.C. 3716, its own administrative offset regulations in this subpart, the applicable administrative offset regulations of the agency holding the funds, and the applicable provisions of the FCCS with respect to providing you with due process.
# EUR-Lex - 12005SAN06/02 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12005SAN06/02

**Act concerning the conditions of accession of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania and the adjustments to the Treaties on which the European Union is founded - Annex VI:List referred to in Article 23 of the Act of Accession: transitional measures, Bulgaria - 2.Freedom to provide services **

*
Official Journal L 157 , 21/06/2005 P. 0282 - 0282 *

2. FREEDOM TO PROVIDE SERVICES

31997 L 0009: Directive 97/9/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 March 1997 on investor-compensation schemes (OJ L 84, 26.3.1997, p. 22).

By way of derogation from Article 4(1) of Directive 97/9/EC, the minimum level of compensation shall not apply in Bulgaria until 31 December 2009. Bulgaria shall ensure that its investor‐compensation scheme provides for cover of not less than EUR 12000 from 1 January 2007 until 31 December 2007 and of not less than EUR 15000 from 1 January 2008 until 31 December 2009.

During the transitional period the other Member States will retain the right to prevent a branch of a Bulgarian investment firm established on their territories from operating unless and until such a branch has joined an officially recognised investor-compensation scheme within the territory of the Member State concerned in order to cover the difference between the Bulgarian level of compensation and the minimum level referred to in Article 4(1) of Directive 97/9/EC.

--------------------------------------------------
EXHIBIT 31

CERTIFICATION

I, Zach Bair, certifythat:

1. I have    reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB of Immediatek, Inc.;

 

2. Based on my    knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a    material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the    statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements    were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my    knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information    included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects    the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small    business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly    report;

 

4. I am the sole    officer and director and I am responsible for establishing and maintaining    disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules    13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

 

a. Designed        such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure        controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure        that material information relating to the small business issuer,        including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others        within those entities, particularly during the period in which this        report is being prepared;

 

b. Evaluated        the effectiveness of the small business issuer disclosure controls and        procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the        effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end        of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c. Disclosed        in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal        control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business        issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth        fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially        affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small        business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. I have    disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over    financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors of the small    business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent    functions):

 

a. All        significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or        operation of internal control over financial reporting which are        reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's        ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;        and

 

b. Any fraud,        whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who        have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control        over financial reporting.

 

 

 

 

Date: August 15, 2005

 

/s/ Zach Bair         

Zach Bair

Chief Executive andFinancial Officer
EXHIBIT 32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Integrated Environmental Technologies, Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William E. Prince, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.










/S/
William E. Prince


William
E. Prince


Chief
Executive Officer and


Principal
Financial Officer


November
16, 2009