Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 184 / Friday, September 22, 2006 / Notices 55429 

that during the period between on or 

about October 27, 1999 and on or about 

February 23, 2000, MAMG engaged in 

conduct prohibited by the Regulations 

when it transferred an uncooled infrared 

camera, an item subject to the 

Regulations, to an individual from the 

United Arab Emirates in violation of a 

BIS license condition. The BIS license 

that authorized the export of the camera 

from the United States to MAMG 

prohibited the resale, transfer, or 

reexport of the camera to anyone other 

than the approved end-users on the 

license without prior authorization by 

the U.S. Government. In transferring the 

camera to a non-approved end-user 

without prior U.S. Government 

authorization, MAMG committed one 

violation of § 764.2(a) of the 

Regulations. 

The charging letter further alleged 

that during the period on or about 

October 27, 1999 and on or about 

February 23, 2000, MAMG transferred 

an uncooled infrared camera, an item 

subject to the Regulations, to an 

individual from the United Arab 

Emirates with knowledge or reason to 

know that a violation would 

subsequently occur in connection with 

the item. Specifically, at the time 

MAMG transferred the camera, it knew 

or had reason to know that the BIS 

license authorizing the export of the 

camera from the United States to 

MAMG prohibited the resale, transfer, 

or reexport of the camera by MAMG to 

any entity other than those listed on the 

license as approved end-users without 

prior U.S. Government authorization. In 

transferring the camera with such 

knowledge, MAMG committed one 

violation of § 764.2(e) of the 

Regulations. 

D. Penalty Recommendation 

[REDACTED SECTION] 

E. Conclusion 

Accordingly, I am referring this 

Recommended Decision and Order to 

the Under Secretary of Commerce for 

Industry and Security for review and 

final action for the agency, without 

further notice to the Respondent, as 

provided in § 766.7 of the Regulations. 

Within thirty (30) days after receipt of 

this Recommended Decision and Order, 

the Under Secretary shall issue a written 

order affirming, modifying, or vacating 

the Recommended Decision and Order. 

See 15 CFR 766.22(c). 

Done and Dated August 30th, 2006. 

Joseph N. Ingolia, 

Chief Administrative Law Judge. 

[FR Doc. 06–8067 Filed 9–21–06; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–33–M 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Bureau of Industry and Security 

Deemed Export Advisory Committee; 

Notice of Partially Closed Meeting 

The Deemed Export Advisory 

Committee (DEAC) will meet on October 

12, 2006, 9 a.m., in the main lobby of 

the Herbert C. Hoover Building, 14th 

Street between Constitution and 

Pennsylvania Avenues, NW., 

Washington, DC. The Committee shall 

advise the Secretary on deemed export 

licensing policy. A tentative agenda of 

topics for discussion is listed below. 

While these topics will likely be 

discussed, this list is not exhaustive and 

there may be discussions on other 

related items during the public session. 

October 12 

Public Session 

1. Introductory Remarks. 

2. Current Deemed Export Control 

Policy Issues. 

3. Technology Transfer Issues. 

4. U.S. Industry Competitiveness. 

5. U.S. Academic and Government 

Research Communities. 

Closed Session 

6. Discussion of matters determined to 

be exempt from the provisions relating 

to public meetings found in 5 U.S.C. 

app.2 §§ 10(a)(1) and 10(a)(3). 

A limited number of seats will be 

available for the public session. 

Reservations are not accepted. To the 

extent time permits, members of the 

public may present oral statements to 

the Committee. 

The public may submit written 

statements at any time before or after the 

meeting. However, to facilitate 

distribution of public presentation 

materials to Committee members, the 

Committee suggests that public 

presentation materials or comments be 

forwarded before the meeting to Ms. 

Yvette Springer at 

Yspringer@bis.doc.gov. 

The Assistant Secretary for 

Administration, with the concurrence of 

the delegate of the General Counsel, 

formally determined on September 14, 

2006, pursuant to section 10(d) of the 

Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 

amended (5 U.S.C. app.2 § (10)(d)), that 

the portion of the meeting dealing with 

matters that are (A) specifically 

authorized under criteria established by 

an Executive order to be kept secret in 

the interests of national defense or 

foreign policy and (B) in fact properly 

classified pursuant to such Executive 

order (5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1)(A) and (1)(B)), 

shall be exempt from the provisions 

relating to public meetings found in 5 

U.S.C. app.2 §§ 10(a)(1) and 10(a)(3). 

The remaining portions of the meeting 

will be open to the public. 

For more information, call Yvette 

Springer at (202) 482–4814. 

Dated: September 19, 2006. 

Yvette Springer, 

Committee Liaison Officer. 

[FR Doc. 06–8068 Filed 9–21–06; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–JT–M 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE. 

International Trade Administration 

[A–427–801] 

Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof from 

France: Notice of Court Decision Not in 

Harmony 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce 

SUMMARY: On September 1, 2006, the 

United States Court of International 

Trade affirmed in part and struck in part 

the Department of Commerce’s 

redetermination on remand of the final 

results of the administrative review of 

the antidumping duty order on ball 

bearings and parts thereof from France. 

See SKF USA Inc., SKF France S.A., and 

Sarma v. United States, Court No. 03–

00490, slip op. 06–133 (CIT 2006). The 

Department is now issuing this notice of 

court decision not in harmony with the 

Department’s determination. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: September 22, 2006. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Yang Jin Chun or Richard Rimlinger, 

AD/CVD Operations, Office 5, Import 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–5760 or (202) 482–

4477, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On June 16, 2003, the Department of 

Commerce (the Department) published 

the final results of the administrative 

review of the antidumping duty order 

on ball bearings and parts thereof from 

France for the period May 1, 2001, 

through April 30, 2002. See Ball 

Bearings and Parts Thereof from France, 

et al.; Final Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Reviews, 

Rescission of Administrative Reviews in 

Part, and Determination Not to Revoke 

Order in Part, 68 FR 35623 (June 16, 

2003). SKF France S.A., SKF USA Inc., 

and Sarma (hereafter ‘‘SKF’’) filed a 

lawsuit challenging the final results. On 

August 24, 2005, the United States 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES