alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT
TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q/A of Searchlight Minerals Corp. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Martin B. Oring, as Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, andMelvin L. Williams, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,
to the best of his knowledge:



(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    | SEARCHLIGHT MINERALS CORP.
|------------------- | --------------------------
|                    |                           
|Date: March 6, 2012 | By:                       
|                    |                           
|                    |                           
|                    |                           
|Date: March 6, 2012 | By:                       
|                    |                           
|                    |
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

The U.S. Small Business Administration Buffalo District Advisory Council located in the geographical area of Buffalo, New York, will hold a public meeting on Wednesday, October 11, 2006, starting at 10 a.m. eastern standard time. The meeting will take place at The Buffalo Club, 388 Delaware Avenue, Buffalo, New York. The purpose of the meeting is to discuss such matters that may be presented by members, and staff of the U.S. Small Business Administration, or others present.

Anyone wishing to make an oral presentation to the Board must contact Franklin J. Sciortino, District Director, Buffalo District Office, in writing by letter or fax no later than Friday, October 6, 2006 in order to be put on the agenda. Franklin J. Sciortino, District Director, Buffalo District Office, U.S. Small Business Administration, Niagara Center, 540 Niagara Center, 130 S. Elmwood Avenue, Buffalo, New York 14202; telephone (716) 551-4301 or fax (716) 551-4418.

Thomas M. Dryer,

Acting Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 06-7988 Filed 9-21-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
###### Editorial Note on [Part 157](/current/title-33/part-157?toc=1)

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 157 appear by USCG-2008-0179, [73 FR 35015](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/73-FR-35015), June 19, 2008.

#### § 157.166 Hydrocarbon emissions.

If the tank vessel having a COW system under [§ 157.10a(a)(2)](/on/2024-09-23/title-33/section-157.10a#p-157.10a(a)(2)) or [§ 157.10c(b)(2)](/on/2024-09-23/title-33/section-157.10c#p-157.10c(b)(2)) transfers cargo at a port in the United States that is in an area designated in [40 CFR Part 81](/on/2024-09-23/title-40/part-81) as an area that does not meet the national primary ambient air quality ozone standard under [40 CFR Part 50](/on/2024-09-23/title-40/part-50), issued under the Clean Air Act, as amended ([42 U.S.C. 1857](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/42/1857)), the master of the vessel shall ensure that when cargo tanks are ballasted in that port the hydrocarbon vapors in each tank are contained by a means under [§ 157.132](/on/2024-09-23/title-33/section-157.132).

Note:

Questions relating to whether or not a particular port is located in an area designated in [40 CFR Part 81](/on/2024-09-23/title-40/part-81) as an area that does not meet the national primary ambient air quality standard under [40 CFR Part 50](/on/2024-09-23/title-40/part-50) should be directed to the Plans Analysis Section of the Environmental Protection Agency at (919) 541-5665.

[CGD 82-28, [50 FR 11628](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/50-FR-11628), Mar. 22, 1985]
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

September 24, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
134371 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 134371 COA: 276503 Genesee CC: 02-009700-FC KEITH LINELL BELL, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appe al the June 20, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, a nd it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

s0917 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 24, 2007

Clerk
Exhibit
32.1





MOBICOM
CORPORATION





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. §1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Mobicom Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael Levinsohn,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date: May
      13, 2008
            By:
            /s/ Michael
  LevinsohnMichael
      LevinsohnChief
      Executive Officer








A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-13-00092-CR

Giles Altman Jenerette

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From the 371st District Court

of Tarrant County (1185638D)

June 13, 2013

Per Curiam

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

the appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for 

want of jurisdiction.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

PER CURIAM
BILL OF COSTS

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, SEVENTH DISTRICT, AT AMARILLO

No. 07-14-00236-CV

Emilio Romero and Linda K. Romero

v.

Stewart Title Guaranty

(No. CI-09C-057 IN 222ND DISTRICT COURT OF DEAF SMITH COUNTY)

Type of Fee Charges Paid By

Motion fee

Motion fee

Reporter's record

Indigent

Supreme Court chapter 51 fee

Filing

Statewide efiling fee $15.00

$10.00

$382.30

$25.00

$50.00

$100.00

$20.00 E-PAID

E-PAID

UNKNOWN

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID Kent Canada

Whitney Pittman

Kent Canada/Defendants

Kent Canada

Kent Canada

Kent Canada

Kent Canada

Balance of costs owing to the Seventh Court of Appeals, Amarillo, Texas: $0.00

Court costs in this cause shall be paid as per

the Judgment issued by this Court.

I, VIVIAN LONG, CLERK OF THE SEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS OF THE

STATE OF TEXAS, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct copy of

the cost bill of THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS,

showing the charges and payments, in the above numbered and styled cause, as the same appears

of record in this office.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my hand

and the Seal of the COURT OF APPEALS for the

Seventh District of Texas on June 8, 2015

.



# Vivian Long

VIVIAN LONG, CLERK
1 The trial court originally dismissed the motion as being untimely filed. Th i s Court remanded to the trial court as to the issueof untimeliness. State v. Elwin South , C.C.A. No. 02C01-9502-CR-00051, Shelby County (Tenn. Crim. App. filed May 7, 1997, at

Jackson) . Upon remand the trial court conducted an evidentiary hearing on the merits of the motion. 

# FILED May 14, 1998 Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate C ourt Clerk IN THE COURT OF CR IMINAL A PPEALS OF TENN ESSEE AT JA CKSON APRIL 1998 SESSION
ELWIN NATHA

NIEL SOUTH, SR., ) ) C.C .A. No. 02C0 1-9710 -CR-0038 6 Appellant, ) ) SHELBY COUNTY ) No. M-14361 VS. ) ) ) AFFIRMED -

RULE 20 STATE OF TENN ESSEE, ) ) Appellee. )
ORDER The defendant, Elwin Nathaniel South, Sr., appeals the order of the Shelby County Criminal Court denyi ng his Tenn. R. Crim. P. 35(b) motion for reduction of sentence. Finding no abuse of discretion by the tri al court, we affirm the judg ment pursuant to Rule 20, Rules of the Court of Criminal Appeals. Defendant pled guilty in 1993 t o three (3) co unts of attempted aggravated rape and was sentenced to concur rent eight-year ter

ms of confinement. Subseque ntly, he filed a motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to Tenn. R. Crim. P. 35(b). 1 At the evidentiary heari ng the seventy-three (73) year old defendant testified, in esse n ce, that he was rehabili tated and had been denied parole.
In the order denyi ng the motion the trial court n oted that these three (3) offenses involved the sexu al fondling of defendant’s three (3) granddaughters, all under the age of thirteen (13). The trial court further noted the extreme seriousness2

of the offenses and the devastating effect upon the victims. The

trial court denied relief.
This Court’s appellate rev iew of the ruling on a Rule 35(b) motion for reduction of sentence is governed by an abuse of discretion standard. State v. Irick , 861 S.W.2d 375, 376 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1993). After a car eful review of

the record, we find no abuse of discretion by the trial court in deny

ing the motion.
We are unable tofind any error in the proceedings below. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 20, Rules of the Court of Criminal Appeals. Since the record reflects that the defendant is indigent, costs of thi s proceeding shall be ass essed to the state.
ENTER:

________________________________ JOE G. RILEY, JUDGE

________________________________ DAVID G. HA

YES, JUDGE (Not Participating) WILLIAM M. B

ARKER, JUDG E
## 1 W W W . V I N O T E M P . C O M A P R O U D H E R I T A G E O F E X P E R I E N C E & Q U A L I T Y

O W N E R ’ S M A N U A L 

# T o u c h S c r e e n W i n e &

B e v e r a g e C o o l e r

V T

- 3 6 T S

## 8 8 W W W . V I N O T E M P . C O M



## PARTS AND SPECIFICATIONS

Model N o. VT

- 36 TS

Voltage AC 115 V

Frequency 60 Hz

Current 2.0 A (77 °F )

Protection Class/Climate Class I / SN; N

Refrigerant R134a/ 1.58 oz

Power Consumption 1.0 kw.h/24h (59 °F )

Input Power 10 0W (77 °F )

Ambient Temperature Range 6 0°

- 90°F

Control Temperature Range Left Zone: 36°

- 43 °F

Right Zone: 40°

- 72 °F

Capacity Left Zone: 58 12 oz. cans

Right Zone: 19 bottles

Net Weight 100 LBS

Gross Weight 110 LBS

Unit Dimensions (W x D x H) 23.43 ” x 22.44 ” x 32.28 ”

* Note: This wine and beverage cooler is d esigned to store approximately 19 standard Bordeaux 750

ml bottles. Storing large and/or oddly shaped bottles (including champagne and sparkling wine bottles)

will decrease the capacity of your appliance

.
#### § 1280.8 Driving on NARA property.

When driving on NARA property, you must obey speed limits, posted signs, and other traffic laws, and park only in designated spaces. We reserve the right to tow, at the owner's expense, any vehicle that is parked illegally. If you must leave your vehicle illegally parked due to an emergency, you must notify the facility security guards as soon as possible. We may, at our discretion, deny any vehicle access to NARA property for public safety or security reasons.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19
- 2193

EVERETT MYERS , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. ANDREW SAUL , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Norfolk

. Raymond A. Jackson , District Judge. ( 2:18

- cv
- 00498

- RAJ

- LRL )

Submitted : January 21, 2021 Decided: February 9, 2021

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Everett Myers, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Everett Myers appeals the district court’s order accepting the m agist rate judge’s
recommendation and dismissing Myers’ complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction ; he also appeals the court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, althou gh we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Myers v.
Saul , No. 2:18

- cv
- 00498

- RAJ

- LRL (E.D. Va. Aug. 7, 2019 & Oct. 1 5 , 2019)

. * We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contenti ons are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED

* The district court executed the margin order denying Rule 59[e] relief on October 11, 2019, and entered it on the docket on October 15, 2019.
#### §§ 217.68-217.69 [Reserved]
EXHIBIT 32.1




                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Medical Makeover  Corporation of
America (the  "Company")  on Form 10-Q for the quarter  ending March 31, 2004 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Periodic Report"), I, Dr. Leonard I. Weinstein,  Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18.U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1. The Periodic  Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ DR. LEONARD I. WEINSTEIN
---------------------------------
Dr. Leonard I. Weinstein
Chief Executive Officer

Date: August 30, 2004



     This  certification  accompanies  the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and  shall not be deemed  filed by the  Company  for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

     A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906, or
other  document  authenticating,   acknowledging,   or  otherwise  adopting  the
signature  that  appears in typed form  within  the  electronic  version of this
written statement  required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and  furnished  to the  Securities  and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                           PERSISTENCE SOFTWARE, INC.

                            CERTIFICATION PRUSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Persistence Software, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Christopher T. Keene, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/ CHRISTOPHER T. KEENE
------------------------
Christopher T. Keene
Chief Executive Officer
August 13, 2004
# EUR-Lex - 12004V409 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V409

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART III — THE POLICIES AND FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - TITLE VI — THE FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - CHAPTER II — FINANCIAL PROVISIONS - Section 3 — Implementation of the budget and discharge - Article III-409 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0177 - 0178 *

Article III-409

1. The European Parliament, on a recommendation from the Council, shall give a discharge to the Commission in respect of the implementation of the budget. To this end, the Council and the European Parliament in turn shall examine the accounts, the financial statement and the evaluation report referred to in Article III-408, the annual report by the Court of Auditors together with the replies of the institutions under audit to the observations of the Court of Auditors, the statement of assurance referred to in the second subparagraph of Article III-384(1) and any relevant special reports by the Court of Auditors.

2. Before giving a discharge to the Commission, or for any other purpose in connection with the exercise of its powers over the implementation of the budget, the European Parliament may ask to hear the Commission give evidence with regard to the execution of expenditure or the operation of financial control systems. The Commission shall submit any necessary information to the European Parliament at the latter's request.

3. The Commission shall take all appropriate steps to act on the observations in the decisions giving discharge and on other observations by the European Parliament relating to the execution of expenditure, as well as on comments accompanying the recommendations on discharge adopted by the Council.

4. At the request of the European Parliament or the Council, the Commission shall report on the measures taken in the light of these observations and comments and in particular on the instructions given to the departments which are responsible for the implementation of the budget. These reports shall also be forwarded to the Court of Auditors.

--------------------------------------------------
Document

Exhibit 10.1

Yelp Inc.
Amendment to Equity Awards
On February 19, 2020, Yelp Inc. (the “Company”) granted to you a Restricted Stock Unit award to be issued up to 93,761 shares of the Company’s Common Stock (the “RSU”) under the Company’s 2012 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended (the “Plan”). On February 19, 2020, the Company also granted to you a Performance Restricted Stock Unit award under the Plan with 23,441 shares, 93,761 shares and 187,522 shares of the Company’s Common Stock issuable at the threshold, target and maximum levels of performance, respectively (the “PSU”).
This Amendment to Equity Awards (the “Amendment”) changes the number of shares subject to the RSU and PSU, among other changes set forth below, effective as of April 7, 2020 (the “Effective Date”). Capitalized terms not explicitly defined in this Amendment but defined in the Plan shall have the meaning set forth in the Plan. 
1. Effective as of the Effective Date, the 17,580 shares subject to your RSU that were eligible to vest on May 20, 2020, August 20, 2020 and October 1, 2020 pursuant to the vesting schedule of your RSU will be forfeited and cease to be eligible to vest.  
2. Effective as of the Effective Date: 
(a) the threshold, target and maximum numbers of shares subject to your PSU shall be reduced to 19,046 shares, 76,181 shares and 152,362 shares, respectively; and 
(b) the definition of “Time-Based Vesting Schedule” set forth in the PSU Vesting Conditions exhibit to your PSU Grant Notice shall be amended to read as follows:
“thirteen equal quarterly installments, as follows: (i) February 20, 2020; (ii) February 20, 2021; and (iii) each Quarterly Vest Date thereafter until fully vested, subject to the Participant’s Continuous Service through each such vesting date.”
Except as explicitly noted in this Amendment, the terms and conditions of the RSU and PSU as set forth in the Plan, your RSU Grant Notice and Agreement and your PSU Grant Notice and Agreement will be unchanged and remain in effect in accordance with the existing terms and conditions of the RSU and PSU.
This Amendment is made in consideration of good and valuable consideration, receipt and sufficiency of which you and the Company hereby acknowledge.  By signing below, you acknowledge your consent and agreement to this Amendment.  
The Company’s stock plan administrator will attach a copy of this letter to the face of the original RSU Grant Notice and Agreement and PSU Grant Notice and Agreement in Company records.  You will not be issued replacement RSU or PSU documentation. Please keep a copy of this Amendment in your records relating to your RSUs and PSUs.
YELP INC.


/s/ Laurence Wilson  
Name: Laurence Wilson
Title: Chief Administrative Officer & General Counsel




Acknowledged and Agreed:
/s/ Jeremy Stoppelman   
Jeremy Stoppelman
Exhibit 10.1
 Summary of Director Compensation
  Board/Committee meeting fees (cash):
    
    $
    1,000
    per meetingAnnual Chair fees (cash):Non-Executive Chairman of Board
    
    $
    32,000Finance and Audit Committee-Chair
    
    $
    6,000Compensation Committee-Chair
    
    $
    4,000Governance Committee-Chair
    
    $
    3,000Annual fees paid to non-executive Board
members:Cash
    
    $
    18,000Stock (cash value)
    
    $
    18,000
§ 13.430 Determination of resident zones. ( a ) A resident zone shall include— ( 1 ) The area within a national park or monument and any lands surrounded by a national park or monument that are not federally owned; and
( 2 ) The communities and areas near a national park or monument which contain significant concentrations of rural residents who, without using aircraft as a means of access for purposes of taking fish or wildlife for subsistence uses (except in extraordinary cases where no reasonable alternative existed), have customarily and traditionally engaged in subsistence uses within a national park or monument. For purposes of determining “significant” concentrations, family members shall also be included.
( b ) After notice and comment, including public hearing in the affected local vicinity, a community or area near a national park or monument may be— ( 1 ) Added to a resident zone; or
( 2 ) Deleted from a resident zone, when such community or area does or does not meet the criteria set forth in paragraph (a) of this section, as appropriate.
( c ) For purposes of this section, the term “family” shall mean all persons living within a rural resident's household on a permanent basis.
[71 FR 69333, Nov. 30, 2006, as amended at 85 FR 72961, Nov. 16, 2020]