alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Your session is about to expire.Resume session

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Welcome.Log inorregisterCOPS OFFICE RESOURCE CENTER

HomeCatalogCartOrders

                    

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                CatalogMatches: 1Offline form Recent Popular Online Print OtherCOPS-P334Preventing and Addressing Bullying and Intolerance: A Guide for Law EnforcementThis guide is intended to be a primary resource for law enforcement officers who play a large role in helping to educate and support children and adults about: the problems resulting from bullying, teasing, and all forms of bias; ways to prevent and intervene in bullying situations; and how to break cycles of bullying and transform student behavior. It includes key definitions of bullying and intolerance, concrete strategies for law enforcement to partner with school leaders, and ideas for police officers, school and community leaders, and students to collaborate and take action together. Also featured are anecdotes from the Not In Our School campaign, an ongoing commitment to empower students to create safe and inclusive environments. The background information and strategies presented apply to young people from all ethnic groups and genders, and all ages, from preschool to high school.By Becki Cohn-VargasCategories: School and Campus SafetyLanguage: EnglishPublic linkhttps://portal.cops.usdoj.gov/resourcecenter?item=cops-p334Click here to see the entire catalog.Cart:Download PDFBook • Oct 2015Search catalogreset title abstract authors contentContaining text: exact phraseNot containing text: exact phraseLanguage:anyEnglishSpanishHmongVietnameseCategory:anyAlternatives to IncarcerationCommunity PartnershipsData and AnalysisEthics and IntegrityFoundations of Community PolicingHiring, Recruitment, and RetentionHomeland SecurityNew Immigrant CommunitiesNonviolent CrimeOtherPolice OperationsPOP Center ResourceSchool and Campus SafetyTechnologyTribalViolent CrimeYouth SafetyPublished after:Published before:Page1

                    

FOIA | No FEAR Act | Open Government | Privacy | Legal|HelpCopyright (C) U.S. Department of Justice, COPS Office, IT Division, 2012 - 2024. All rights reserved.
Rendered on Mon Mar 4 2024 at 06:00 (UTC-5) in 0.19 secEnterprise Framework 3.21.7.7 • Store Controls 3.3.1.7Survey 500303407 Section 60000560 Rules Hints Inactive
# EUR-Lex - 12006E154 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12006E154

**Treaty establishing the European Community (consolidated version) - Part Three - Community policies - TITLE XV - Trans-European networks - Article 154 **

*
Official Journal C 321 E , 29/12/2006 P. 0116 - 0116 Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0101 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0248 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0048 - Consolidated version *

Article 154

1. To help achieve the objectives referred to in Articles 14 and 158 and to enable citizens of the Union, economic operators and regional and local communities to derive full benefit from the setting-up of an area without internal frontiers, the Community shall contribute to the establishment and development of trans-European networks in the areas of transport, telecommunications and energy infrastructures.

2. Within the framework of a system of open and competitive markets, action by the Community shall aim at promoting the interconnection and interoperability of national networks as well as access to such networks. It shall take account in particular of the need to link island, landlocked and peripheral regions with the central regions of the Community.

--------------------------------------------------
Rockingham,

No. 4645.

#### Parsons & Sons Lumber Co. *v.*John L. Southwick, Jr. *& a.*

Submitted March 5, 1958.

Decided March 20, 1958.

*259
      *Verdi McKay*for the plaintiff, furnished no brief.

*John L. Southwick, Jr., pro se,*for the defendants, furnished no brief.

Kenison, C. J.

This is a transitory action *(Emery*v. *Hovey,*84 N. H. 499) on promissory notes payable in Massachusetts brought by a New York corporation against the defendants, one of whom is a resident of this state, and the other a resident of Massachusetts. A court may acquire jurisdiction over an individual by personal service upon him within the state even though he may be here only temporarily. Restatement, Judgments, *s.*15, *comment*a. If the individual is personally served with process within the state it is immaterial that he is domiciled elsewhere or that immediately after the service of process he leaves the state. Restatement, Conflict of Laws, *s.*78. Physical presence within the state is the traditional basis of jurisdiction at common law. Restatement of the Law, Second, Conflict of Laws, *s.*78, *comment*a (tentative draft No. 3, 1956). “If a citizen of another state is found here, and process is served on him personally, that gives the court jurisdiction.” *Libbey*v. *Hodgdon,*9 N. H. 394, 396. See *Taplin*v. *Atwater,*297 Mass. 302; *Young*v. *Ross,*31 N. H. 201. Consequently, cases in which jurisdiction has been denied where the defendant was a nonresident and not served with process within the state are inapplicable. *Wyman*v. *Uphaus,*
      *260100 N. H. 1; *Rosenblum*v. *Company,*99 N. H. 267, 269; *Nottingham*v. *Company,*84 N. H. 419.

Since the defendants have no special immunity or privilege exempting them from service of process within the state, the defendants’ plea to the jurisdiction was properly overruled. *Pitman*v. *Cunningham,*100 N. H. 49. The Trial Court properly found that the claim that the action was brought in New Hampshire to harass the defendants was not established by sufficient evidence. There is no occasion for us to consider whether the action should be dismissed under the doctrine of *forum non conveniens. Thistle*v. *Halstead,*96 N. H. 87.

*Exceptions overruled.*

All concurred.
§ 1202.22 Will NARA need my Social Security Number? ( a ) Before a NARA employee or NARA contractor asks you to provide your social security number (SSN), he or she will ensure that the disclosure is required by Federal law or under a Federal law or regulation adopted before January 1, 1975.
( b ) If you are asked to provide your SSN, the NARA employee or contractor must first inform you: ( 1 ) Whether the disclosure is mandatory or voluntary;
( 2 ) The statute or authority under which your SSN is solicited; and
( 3 ) How your SSN will be used.
§ 54.604 Determining the urban rate. ( a ) Effective funding year 2024: ( 1 ) If a rural health care provider requests support for an eligible service to be funded from the Telecommunications Program that is to be provided over a distance that is less than or equal to the “standard urban distance,” as defined in paragraph (a)(3) of this section, for the state in which it is located, the “urban rate” for that service shall be a rate no higher than the highest tariffed or publicly-available rate charged to a commercial customer for a functionally similar service in any city with a population of 50,000 or more in that state, calculated as if it were provided between two points within the city.
( 2 ) If a rural health care provider requests an eligible service to be provided over a distance that is greater than the “standard urban distance,” as defined in paragraph (a)(3) of this section, for the state in which it is located, the urban rate for that service shall be a rate no higher than the highest tariffed or publicly-available rate charged to a commercial customer for a functionally similar service provided over the standard urban distance in any city with a population of 50,000 or more in that state, calculated as if the service were provided between two points within the city.
( 3 ) The “standard urban distance” for a state is the average of the longest diameters of all cities with a population of 50,000 or more within the state.
( 4 ) The Administrator shall calculate the “standard urban distance” and shall post the “standard urban distance” and the maximum supported distance for each state on its website.
( b ) As of funding year 2025, if a rural health care provider requests support for an eligible service to be funded from the Telecommunications Program the “urban rate” for that service shall be a rate no higher than the highest tariffed or publicly-available rate charged to a commercial customer for a functionally similar service in any city with a population of 50,000 or more in that state, calculated as if it were provided between two points within the city.
[89 FR 1845, Jan. 11, 2024]
#### § 25.22 Lost and found articles.

Lost articles or money found on a national wildlife refuge are to be immediately turned in to the nearest refuge office.
Your session is about to expire.Resume session

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Welcome.Log inorregisterCOPS OFFICE RESOURCE CENTER

HomeCatalogCartOrders

                    

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                CatalogMatches: 1Offline form Recent Popular Online Print OtherCOPS-P333Procedural Justice for Law Enforcement: An OverviewProcedural justice has become an important focal point in the profession and strategy of policing in recent years. The purpose of this publication is to introduce law enforcement professionals to the concept of procedural justice and to encourage law enforcement to research the concept beyond what is captured in this introduction. The goal of this publication is to have a national understanding of procedural justice in policing and to strive towards institutionalizing the concepts throughout agencies across the country to build trust and confidence and advance public safety.By Laura Kunard, Charlene MoeCategories: Community PartnershipsLanguage: EnglishPublic linkhttps://portal.cops.usdoj.gov/resourcecenter?item=cops-p333Click here to see the entire catalog.Cart:Download PDFBook • Oct 2015Search catalogreset title abstract authors contentContaining text: exact phraseNot containing text: exact phraseLanguage:anyEnglishSpanishHmongVietnameseCategory:anyAlternatives to IncarcerationCommunity PartnershipsData and AnalysisEthics and IntegrityFoundations of Community PolicingHiring, Recruitment, and RetentionHomeland SecurityNew Immigrant CommunitiesNonviolent CrimeOtherPolice OperationsPOP Center ResourceSchool and Campus SafetyTechnologyTribalViolent CrimeYouth SafetyPublished after:Published before:Page1

                    

FOIA | No FEAR Act | Open Government | Privacy | Legal|HelpCopyright (C) U.S. Department of Justice, COPS Office, IT Division, 2012 - 2024. All rights reserved.
Rendered on Mon Mar 4 2024 at 05:53 (UTC-5) in 0.20 secEnterprise Framework 3.21.7.7 • Store Controls 3.3.1.7Survey 500303407 Section 60000560 Rules Hints Inactive
§ 80.99 Are symbols available to identify projects? Yes. The following distinctive symbols are available to identify projects funded by the Acts and products on which taxes and duties have been collected to support the Acts: ( a ) The symbol of the Pittman-Robertson Wildlife Restoration Act follows:
( b ) The symbol of the Dingell-Johnson Sport Fish Restoration Act follows:
( c ) The symbol of the Acts when used in combination follows:
[76 FR 46156, Aug. 1, 2011, as amended at 79 FR 54668, Sept. 12, 2014]
V

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5138

For the relief of Saeed Ghasemimehr.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 29, 1994

Mr. RAMSTAD introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

For the relief of Saeed Ghasemimehr.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR SAEED

4 GHASEMIMEHR.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a)

6 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality

7 Act, Saeed Ghasemimehr shall be eligible for issuance of

8 an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status to that of

9 an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon

10 filing an application for issuance of an immigrant visa

11 under section 204 of such Act or for adjustment of status

12 to lawful permanent resident.
2

•HR 5138 IH

1 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Saeed

2 Ghasemimehr enters the United States before the filing

3 deadline specified in subsection (c), he shall be considered

4 to have entered and remained lawfully and shall, if other5 wise eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status under

6 section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of

7 the date of the enactment of this Act.

8 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

9 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap10 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica11 tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees

12 within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act.

13 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.—

14 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res15 idence to Saeed Ghasemimehr, the Secretary of State shall

16 instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the cur17 rent or next following fiscal year, the total number of im18 migrant visas that are made available to natives of the

19 country of the alien’s birth under section 203(a) of the

20 Immigration and Nationality Act or, if applicable, the

21 total number of immigrant visas that are made available

22 to natives of the country of the alien’s birth under section

23 202(e) of such Act.

Æ
# United States Court of Appeals
**for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

September 2, 2010

ERRATA

______________________

Appeal No. 2010-5004

THERESA CEDILLO AND MICHAEL CEDILLO, (AS PARENTS AND NATURAL GUARDIANS OF), MICHELLE CEDILLO,

Petitioners-Appellants,

v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent-Appellee.

Decided: August 27, 2010 Precedential Opinion

______________________

Please make the following changes:

Page 14, line 4, change “proferred” to “proffered”

Page 17, note 4, line 6, change “was not supplied” to “ were not supplied”
#### § 1223.24 When can vital records be destroyed?

The disposition of vital records that are original records is governed by records schedules approved by NARA (see part 1225, Scheduling Records, of this subchapter). Agencies must not destroy original records that are not scheduled. Duplicate copies created and maintained for vital records purposes only may be destroyed when superseded or obsolete during the routine vital records cycle process.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

In re: 

Courtney C Johnson

Debtor(s)

Case No. 16-25481

CHAPTER 13 STANDING TRUSTEE’S FINAL REPORT AND ACCOUNT

Glenn Stearns, chapter 13 trustee, submits the following Final Report and Account of the 

administration of the estate pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1302(b)(1). The trustee declares as follows:

1) The case was filed on 08/09/2016.

2) The plan was confirmed on NA .

3) The plan was modified by order after confirmation pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1329 on

NA .

4) The trustee filed action to remedy default by the debtor in performance under the plan 

on NA .

5) The case was dismissed on 09/02/2016.

6) Number of months from filing to last payment: 0.

7) Number of months case was pending: 3.

8) Total value of assets abandoned by court order: NA .

9) Total value of assets exempted: NA .

10) Amount of unsecured claims discharged without payment: $0.00.

11) All checks distributed by the trustee relating to this case have cleared the bank.

UST Form 101-13-FR-S (9/1/2009)

Case 16-25481 Doc 20 Filed 11/07/16 Entered 11/07/16 11:44:40 Desc Page 1

 of 3
Receipts:

Total paid by or on behalf of the debtor $0.00

Less amount refunded to debtor $0.00

NET RECEIPTS: $0.00

Expenses of Administration:

Attorney’s Fees Paid Through the Plan $0.00

Court Costs $0.00

Trustee Expenses & Compensation $0.00

Other $0.00

TOTAL EXPENSES OF ADMINISTRATION: $0.00

Attorney fees paid and disclosed by debtor: $0.00

Scheduled Creditors:

Creditor

Name Class

Claim

Scheduled

Claim

Asserted

Claim

Allowed

Int.

Paid

Principal

Paid

Summary of Disbursements to Creditors:

Secured Payments:

Mortgage Ongoing

Mortgage Arrearage

Debt Secured by Vehicle

All Other Secured

TOTAL SECURED:

Priority Unsecured Payments:

Domestic Support Arrearage

Domestic Support Ongoing

All Other Priority

TOTAL PRIORITY:

GENERAL UNSECURED PAYMENTS:

Claim

Allowed

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

Principal

Paid

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

Interest

Paid

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

UST Form 101-13-FR-S (9/1/2009)

Case 16-25481 Doc 20 Filed 11/07/16 Entered 11/07/16 11:44:40 Desc Page 2

 of 3
Disbursements:

Expenses of Administration $0.00

Disbursements to Creditors $0.00

TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS : $0.00

12) The trustee certifies that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 5009, 

the estate has been fully administered, the foregoing summary is true and complete, and all 

administrative matters for which the trustee is responsible have been completed. The trustee 

requests a final decree be entered that discharges the trustee and grants such other relief as may 

be just and proper.

Dated: 11/04/2016

STATEMENT: This Unified Form is associated with an open bankruptcy case, therefore, Paperwork Reduction 

Act exemption 5 C.F.R. § 1320.4(a)(2) applies.

By:/s/ Glenn Stearns

Trustee

UST Form 101-13-FR-S (9/1/2009)

Case 16-25481 Doc 20 Filed 11/07/16 Entered 11/07/16 11:44:40 Desc Page 3

 of 3
----

            RECOMMENDATION No 1/2005 OF THE EU-MOROCCO ASSOCIATION COUNCIL         

of 24 October 2005         

on the implementation of the EU-Morocco Action Plan

(2005/757/EC)

THE EU-MOROCCO ASSOCIATION COUNCIL,

Having regard to the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement establishing an association between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Kingdom of Morocco, of the other part, and in particular Article 80 thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION:

Sole Article

The Association Council recommends that the Parties implement the EU-Morocco Action Plan (1) insofar as such implementation is directed towards attainment of the objectives of the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement.

Done at Brussels, 24 October 2005.

For the Association Council

The President

M. BENAÏSSA            

----

(1)  http://register.consilium.eu.int

----
I. 

! 

SERVED: October 7, 2014 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

CHRISTINE CLOUD 

DOCKET NO. FAA 2014-0321 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

AMENDED PROCEDURAL ORDER 

We do not anticipate reaching this case prior to January 2015. 

Unless specifically changed herein all prior orders remain in effect. 

WHEREFORE, the parties be and are hereby ORDERED to adhere to the 

following procedural schedule: 

1. On or before January 9, 2015, the parties shall conclude all discovery including, 

but not limited to, depositions, document production, responses to production 

requests and/or interrogatories. If the parties cannot resolve a discovery dispute 

they shall submit the dispute to the undersigned for resolution in a timely manner; 

2. The parties shall be prepared to present this case at a hearing on or after January 

9, 2015, subject to the availability of courtroom facilities. The specific date and 

time for the hearing will be forthcoming in a separate Order. 

Richard C. Goodwin 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment - Service List 
SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 1 

Christine Cloud, Respondent 

12661 Tanada Circle, Apt. 2 

Anchorage, AK 99515 

Glenn H. Brown, Complainant's Counsel 

Senior Attorney 

Office of the Regional Counsel 

Federal Aviation Administration 

222 West 7th A venue # 14 

Anchorage, AK 99513-7587 

TEL: 907-271-5271 

FAX: 907-271-2800 

ONE COPY 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-5121 Staff Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

Docket No. FAA-2014-0321 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

2
# EUR-Lex - 12003T015 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12003T015

**Act concerning the conditions of accession of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia and the Slovak Republic and the adjustments to the Treaties on which the European Union is founded - Part two : Adjustments to the Treaties - Title I : Institutional provisions - Chapter 5 : the Committee of the Regions - **

*
Official Journal L 236 , 23/09/2003 P. 0038 - 0038 *

Article 15

The third paragraph of Article 263 of the EC Treaty is replaced by the following:

"The number of members of the Committee shall be as follows:

Belgium | 12 |

Czech Republic | 12 |

Denmark | 9 |

Germany | 24 |

Estonia | 7 |

Greece | 12 |

Spain | 21 |

France | 24 |

Ireland | 9 |

Italy | 24 |

Cyprus | 6 |

Latvia | 7 |

Lithuania | 9 |

Luxembourg | 6 |

Hungary | 12 |

Malta | 5 |

Netherlands | 12 |

Austria | 12 |

Poland | 21 |

Portugal | 12 |

Slovenia | 7 |

Slovakia | 9 |

Finland | 9 |

Sweden | 12 |

United Kingdom | 24" |

--------------------------------------------------