alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 86.17 Who must own the site of a BIG-funded facility? ( a ) You or another entity approved by us must own or have a legal right to operate the site of a BIG-funded facility. If you are not the owner, you must be able to show, before we approve your grant, that your contractual arrangements with the owner of the site will ensure that the owner will use the BIG-funded facility for its authorized purpose for its useful life.
( b ) Subgrantees or concessioners may be a local or tribal government, a nonprofit organization, a commercial enterprise, an institution of higher education, or a State agency other than the agency receiving the grant.
( c ) Subgrantees that are commercial enterprises are subject to 2 CFR part 200, subparts A through D, for grant administrative requirements.
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20463

August 10, 2023

CERTIFIED MAIL

RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED

Jason Torchinsky, Esq.

Jessica Furst Johnson, Esq.

Matthew S. Petersen, Esq.

Holtzman Vogel Baran Torchinsky & Josefiak PLLC 

2300 N St. NW, Suite 643 

Washington, D.C. 20037 

RE: Advisory Opinion Request 2023-05 

Dear Counsel: 

This letter responds to your letter received June 16, 2023, requesting an advisory opinion 

on behalf of Alamo PAC. The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the Commission has 

concluded consideration of your advisory opinion request without issuing an advisory opinion. 

The Commission publicly released three draft advisory opinions in response to your 

request. The drafts were identified as Agenda Document Nos. 23-19-A and 23-19-B (released 

August 2, 2023) and Agenda Document No. 23-19-C (released August 4, 2023). These agenda 

documents are available on the Commission’s website at www.fec.gov/meetings/. 

At its Open Meeting of August 10, 2023, the Commission considered but did not approve 

any of the draft advisory opinions. The Commission voted 3-3 on Agenda Document No. 23-19-

A; 1-5 on Agenda Document No. 23-19-B; and 2-3, with one abstention, on Agenda Document 

No. 23-19-C. The Federal Election Campaign Act requires an affirmative vote of four members 

of the Commission to render an advisory opinion. See 52 U.S.C §§ 30106(c), 30107(a)(7); see

also 11 C.F.R. § 112.4(a). Thus, the Commission was unable to render an advisory opinion in 

response to your request. 
Holtzman Vogel Baran Torchinsky & Josefiak PLLC

Page 2

If you have any questions, please contact Evan R. Christopher, Attorney, or Robert M. 

Knop, Assistant General Counsel, at (202) 694-1650. 

Sincerely,

Neven F. Stipanovic

Associate General Counsel
###### Editorial Note on Part 300

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 300 appear at 64 FR 44431, Aug. 16, 1999, and at 76 FR 59305, Sept. 26, 2011.

#### § 300.180 Purpose and scope.

The regulations in this subpart are issued under the authority of the Atlantic Tunas Convention Act of 1975 (ATCA), Tuna Conventions Act of 1950, and Magnuson-Stevens Act. The regulations implement the recommendations of the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT) for the conservation and management of tuna and tuna-like species in the Atlantic Ocean and of the Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission (IATTC) for the conservation and management of highly migratory fish resources in the Eastern Tropical Pacific Ocean, so far as they affect vessels and persons subject to the jurisdiction of the United States.
EXHIBIT 31.2


              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Jason Smart, certify that:

1. I have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report  on Form 10-Q of  Medical  Makeover
Corporation of America;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer  and  I  are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

     a.  designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or caused  such
disclosure  controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to
ensure that  material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including  its
consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
     b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions  about the effectiveness
of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the period covered
by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and
     c. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over  financial  reporting  that occurred  during the  registrant's  most recent
fiscal  quarter  that  has  materially  affected,  or is  reasonably  likely  to
materially affect, the registrant's  internal control over financial  reporting;
and

5. I have  disclosed,  based on our most recent  evaluation of internal  control
over financial reporting,  to the registrant's  auditors and the audit committee
of the  registrant's  board of directors (or persons  performing  the equivalent
functions):

     a. all significant  deficiencies  and material  weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal  control over  financial  reporting,  which are reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and
     b. any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves  management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's  internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: May 15, 2009              /s/ Jason Smart
                                ---------------------
                                Jason Smart
                                Chief Accounting Officer
The Honorable Harold D. Vietor, United States District Judge for the Southern 1

District of Iowa, sitting by designation.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 98-2517

___________

Donald Elwyn Pennington, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Western District of Arkansas.

Southwestern Bell Corporation *

Sickness and Accident Disability * [UNPUBLISHED]

Benefit Plan, *

*

Appellee. *

___________

Submitted: January 15, 1999

Filed: January 25, 1999 

___________

Before BOWMAN, Circuit Judge, MURPHY, Circuit Judge, and VIETOR, District 1

Judge.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Donald Elwyn Pennington sought payment of benefits under the Southwestern

Bell Corporation Sickness and Accident Disability Benefit Plan. His claim was based

on injury to his back from lifting a full pay-phone coin receptacle. The Plan committee

determined that his claim was untimely and, alternatively, that he had not been injured
The Honorable H. Franklin Waters, United States District Judge for the

2

Western District of Arkansas.

-2-

in an "accident" as that term is defined in the Plan. The District Court affirmed the

2

denial of benefits. Pennington appeals.

Having carefully considered the appeal, we conclude that no error of law

appears and that an opinion by this Court would lack precedential value. Without

further discussion, the judgment is affirmed on the basis of the thorough and wellreasoned opinion of the District Court.

AFFIRMED. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
###### Editorial Note on [Subchapter A of Chapter VIII](/current/title-7/chapter-VIII/subchapter-A)

#### Authority:

[7 U.S.C. 71-87K](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/7/71), [1621-1627](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/7/1621).

###### Editorial Note on [Subchapter A of Chapter VIII](/current/title-7/chapter-VIII/subchapter-A)

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at [84 FR 45645](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/84-FR-45645), Aug. 30, 2019.

#### § 868.313 Grades and grade requirements for the class Brewers Milled Rice. (See also [§ 868.315](/on/2024-09-20/title-7/section-868.315).)

Grades, Grade Requirements, and Grade Designations

| Grade | Maximum limits of— paddy kernels and seeds | | Color requirements1 | Minimum milling requirements2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Total (singly or combined) (percent) | Objectionable seeds (percent) |
| U.S. No. 13 4 | 0.5 | 0.05 | White or Creamy | Well milled. |
| U.S. No. 23 4 | 1.0 | 0.1 | Slightly gray | Well milled. |
| U.S. No. 33 4 | 1.5 | 0.2 | Light gray or slightly rosy | Reasonably well milled. |
| U.S. No. 43 4 | 3.0 | 0.4 | Gray or rosy | Reasonably well milled. |
| U.S. No. 5 | 5.0 | 1.5 | Dark gray or very rosy | Reasonably well milled. |
| U.S. Sample grade: | | | | |
| U.S. Sample grade shall be milled rice of this class which: (a) Does not meet the requirements for any of the grades from U.S. No. 1 to U.S. No. 5, inclusive; (b) contains more than 15.0 percent of moisture; (c) is musty or sour, or heating; (d) has any commercially objectionable foreign odor; (e) has a badly damaged or extremely red appearance; (f) contains more than 0.1 percent of foreign material; (g) contains more than 15.0 percent of broken kernels that will pass through a 21/2 sieve; (h) contains two or more live or dead weevils or other insects, insect webbing, or insect refuse; or (h) is otherwise of distinctly low quality. | | | | |
| | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 For the special grade Parboiled milled rice, see [§ 868.315(c)](/on/2024-09-20/title-7/section-868.315#p-868.315(c)). | | | | |
| 2 For the special grade Undermilled milled rice, see [§ 868.315(d)](/on/2024-09-20/title-7/section-868.315#p-868.315(d)). | | | | |
| 3 Grades U.S. No. 1 to U.S. No. 4, inclusive, shall contain not more than 3.0 percent of heat-damaged kernels, kernels damaged by heat and/or parboiled kernels in nonparboiled rice. | | | | |
| 4 Grades U.S. No. 1 to U.S. No. 4, inclusive, shall contain not more than 1.0 percent of material passing through a 30 sieve. This limit does not apply to the special grade Granulated brewers milled rice. | | | | |

[[67 FR 61252](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/67-FR-61252), Sept. 30, 2002]
#### § 1002.20 Skating, skateboards and similar devices.

Using roller skates, skateboards, roller skis, coasting vehicles, or similar devices is prohibited, except in designated areas.
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Annual Report of Abraxas Petroleum Corporation (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert
L.G. Watson, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and


(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.











/s/ Robert L.G.
Watson


Robert L.G. Watson


Chairman of the Board, President and
Chief Executive Officer


February 24, 2009














This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Case 16-82176 Doc 3 Filed 09/15/16 Entered 09/15/16 11:29:30 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
#### § 218.3 Permissible methods of taking.

Under an LOA issued pursuant to §§ 216.106 of this chapter and 218.7, the Holder of the LOA (hereinafter “Navy”) may incidentally, but not intentionally, take marine mammals within the area described in § 218.1(b) by Level B harassment associated with construction activities, provided the activity is in compliance with all terms, conditions, and requirements of the regulations in this subpart and the applicable LOA.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

2 Initially, Rothstein also argued that he was denied due

process during sentencing. He has abandoned this point. See

Reply Brief.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-50593

Summary Calendar

 

HAROLD ALLEN ROTHSTEIN,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

JANET M. RENO, Attorney General; R.V. FRANCO, Warden; 

UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE FOR THE WESTERN

DISTRICT OF TEXAS,

Respondents-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. EP-96-CV-283

- - - - - - - - - -

May 21, 1998

Before WISDOM, WIENER, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges

PER CURIAM:*

Harold Rothstein, federal prisoner # 02736-003, appeals the

district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 motion. He

argues that he should receive credit for presentence detention

time toward his sentence for violating his probation.2

Rothstein’s sentence for violating his probation is to run
No. 97-50593

-2-

consecutively with his sentence for violating his parole. 

Rothstein received credit for the presentence detention time

towards his separate parole-violation sentence. He does not have

a right to double credit for the time served. See Radcliffe v.

Clark, 451 F.2d 250, 251-52 (5th Cir. 1971).

The judgement is AFFIRMED.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, March 29, 2022. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, March 29, 2022 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A22I0149. RYAN LILES v. THE STATE. Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 2121T1219
# EUR-Lex - 12004V353 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V353

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART III — THE POLICIES AND FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - TITLE VI — THE FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - CHAPTER I — PROVISIONS GOVERNING THE INSTITUTIONS - Section 1 — The institutions - Subsection 5 — The Court of Justice of the European Union - Article III-353 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0156 - 0156 *

Article III-353

The Court of Justice shall sit in chambers, as a Grand Chamber or as a full Court, in accordance with the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union.

--------------------------------------------------
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 13

- 00726

- CV
Harlingen Consolidated Independent School District v. Sara Ann Guardiola
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No 3 of Cameron County , Texas

Trial Cause No. 2013

- CCL

- 0355

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COUR T OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes the appeal should be DISMISSED . The Court orders the appeal DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion

. Each party shall bear their own costs relating to this appeal

. We further order this dec ision certified below for observance.

March 27, 2014
§ 86.102 Can I appeal a decision? You can appeal the Director's, Assistant Director's, or Regional Director's decision on any matter subject to this part according to 2 CFR 200.341. ( a ) You must send the appeal to the Director within 30 calendar days of the date that the Director, Assistant Director, or Regional Director mails or otherwise informs you of a decision.
( b ) You may appeal the Director's decision under paragraph (a) of this section to the Secretary of the Interior within 30 calendar days of the date that the Director mailed the decision. An appeal to the Secretary must follow procedures at 43 CFR part 4, subpart G, “Special Rules Applicable to Other Appeals and Hearings.”
# National POW/MIA Recognition Day, 2006

As a Nation, we look to our service men and women as examples of courage and sacrifice. When our country and the world have needed brave Americans to advance the cause of freedom, our men and women in uniform have proudly stepped forward and selflessly endured hardships to defend liberty. We are grateful to all who have served, and on National POW/MIA Recognition Day, we give special honor to the extraordinary patriots who have been prisoners of war and to those who are still missing in action. We take inspiration from their valor and loyalty and will not rest until we have accounted for them all.

On National POW/MIA Recognition Day, the National League of Families POW/MIA flag is flown over the White House, the Capitol, the Departments of State, Defense, and Veterans Affairs, the Vietnam Veterans Memorial, Korean War Veterans Memorial, World War II Memorial, U.S. military installations, national cemeteries, and other locations across our country. The POW/MIA flag is a symbol of our Nation's resolve never to forget the service and great sacrifice of the heroes who have carried out liberty's urgent and noble mission, even at the cost of their own freedom. On this day, we express our deep appreciation to each of our Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen, and Marines and our enduring commitment to achieve the fullest possible accounting for all of our men and women in uniform who have been prisoners of war or are missing in action.

                    NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the United States do hereby proclaim Friday, September 15, 2006, as National POW/MIA Recognition Day. I call upon the people of the United States to join me in paying solemn tribute to all former American prisoners of war and those missing in action who valiantly served our great country. I call upon Federal, State, and local government officials and private organizations to observe this day with appropriate ceremonies and activities.                          ( print page 54888)    

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this fourteenth day of September, in the year of our Lord two thousand six, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-first.

[FR Doc. 06-7860

Billing code 3195-01-P
Bold solutions to streamline and improve

the defense acquisition process.

• The Section 809 Panel is a congressionally 

 mandated panel tasked with streamlining and 

 improving the defense acquisition process. 

• We believe bold improvements are needed to 

 create an agile and simple defense acquisition 

 process that provides the warfighter what they 

 need, when they need it. 

• Our panel consists of 18 commissioners who are 

 senior marketplace and government leaders with 

 more than 350 years of collective experience. 

• We have two years to develop recommendations 

 for change in the regulation and associated 

 statute.

We are a catalyst that restores agility and 

simplicity to defense acquisition through bold 

and effective solutions.

BOLD: Bold solutions to reverse the current 

course of failed tinkering and incremental 

approaches to reform.

SIMPLE: Cleaning out the regulatory underbrush 

so goods and services can be purchased in a timely 

manner without unnecessary burden. 

EFFECTIVE: Reform for an agile, results-driven 

acquisition process compelled by our nation’s 

strategic needs.

POCKET GUIDE

PAO: shayne.martin@dau.mil 202-531-6487
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5304

To amend the Clean Air Act to modify provisions relating to the redesignation

of areas and motor vehicle inspection and maintenance programs, and

for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 29, 1994

Mr. KLINK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Energy and Commerce

A BILL

To amend the Clean Air Act to modify provisions relating

to the redesignation of areas and motor vehicle inspection

and maintenance programs, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION AS ATTAINMENT.

4 Section 107(d)(3)(B) of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C.

5 7407(d)(3)(B)) is amended by inserting ‘‘(i)’’ after ‘‘(B)’’,

6 and adding the following new clause (ii) at the end thereof:

7 ‘‘(ii) Notwithstanding the provisions of subpara8 graph (B), if the Governor submits a redesignation

9 of an appropriate area, or portion thereof, from non-
2

•HR 5304 IH

1 attainment to attainment, and such designation is

2 based upon the attainment of the relevant National

3 Ambient Air Quality Standard for 3 consecutive

4 years, such redesignation shall become effective im5 mediately upon receipt by the Administrator.’’.

6 SEC. 2. COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS.

7 Section 182(a)(2)(B) of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C.

8 7511a(a)(2)(B)) is amended by adding the following new

9 clause at the end thereof:

10 ‘‘(iii) The Office of Technology Assessment

11 shall conduct a study of methods for imple12 menting enhanced inspection and maintenance

13 programs. The study shall be conducted in con14 sultation with the General Accounting Office,

15 officials in the affected States, and the Admin16 istrator. Such study shall include an evaluation

17 of the cost effectiveness of such methods, in18 cluding consumer inconvenience costs and the

19 impact on small business. The study shall in20 clude specific recommendations so that the

21 States shall have flexibility to fashion effective,

22 fair and reasonable enhanced programs for the

23 affected consumer. Such study shall be pub24 lished on or before March 1, 1995, and the Ad25 ministrator shall republish the motor vehicle in-
3

•HR 5304 IH

1 spection and maintenance guidance document

2 published under clause (ii) on or before June

3 30, 1995, and incorporate therein the findings

4 of the study.’’.

5 SEC. 3. TIMING FOR STATES.

6 Section 182(c)(3)(A) of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C.

7 7511a(c)(3)(A)) is amended by adding the following at the

8 end thereof: ‘‘Notwithstanding any other provision of law

9 or regulation, each State shall have one year from the pub10 lication of the study described in subsection (a)(2)(B)(iii)

11 to submit, revise, alter or amend the applicable implemen12 tation plan with respect to the enhanced motor vehicle in13 spection and maintenance program. In the interim, States

14 shall incorporate each of the specific elements set forth

15 in clauses (i), (ii), (iii), (iv), (v), and (vii) of subparagraph

16 (C) as expeditiously as possible.’’.

Æ