alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EUR-Lex - 12004V163 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V163

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART III — THE POLICIES AND FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - TITLE III — INTERNAL POLICIES AND ACTION - CHAPTER I — INTERNAL MARKET - Section 5 — Rules on competition - Subsection 1 — Rules applying to undertakings - Article III-163 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0069 - 0070 *

Article III-163

The Council, on a proposal from the Commission, shall adopt the European regulations to give effect to the principles set out in Articles III-161 and III-162. It shall act after consulting the European Parliament.

Such regulations shall be designed in particular:

(a) to ensure compliance with the prohibitions laid down in Article III-161(1) and in Article III-162 by making provision for fines and periodic penalty payments;

(b) to lay down detailed rules for the application of Article III-161(3), taking into account the need to ensure effective supervision on the one hand, and to simplify administration to the greatest possible extent on the other;

(c) to define, if need be, in the various branches of the economy, the scope of Articles III-161 and III-162;

(d) to define the respective functions of the Commission and of the Court of Justice of the European Union in applying the provisions laid down in this paragraph;

(e) to determine the relationship between Member States' laws and this Subsection as well as the European regulations adopted pursuant to this Article.

--------------------------------------------------
#### § 697.10 Penalties.

See § 600.735 of this chapter.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND THE CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         556,300
<SECURITIES>                                   392,278
<RECEIVABLES>                                  175,637
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (6,522)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,173,830
<PP&E>                                         222,778
<DEPRECIATION>                                (92,615)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,998,731
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          315,398
<BONDS>                                        459,812
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           405
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,123,203
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,998,731
<SALES>                                        686,092
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               837,247
<CGS>                                           29,247
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  135,919
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,143,520
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              23,314
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (425,818)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    69,012
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (494,830)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (494,830)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (1.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.24)


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 194 (Friday, October 6, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 59113]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-8545]



[[Page 59113]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


Sunshine Act Meeting; Notice of Agency Meeting

    Pursuant to the provisions of the ``Government in the Sunshine 
Act'' (5 U.S.C. 552b), notice is hereby given that at 10:30 a.m. on 
Tuesday, October 10, 2006, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation's 
Board of Directors will meet in closed session, pursuant to section 
552b(c)(2), (c)(4), (c)(6), (c)(8), (c)(9)(A)(ii), (c)(9)(B), and 
(c)(10) Title 5, United States Code, to consider matters relating to 
the Corporation's supervisory and corporate activities.
    The meeting will be held in the Board Room on the sixth floor of 
the FDIC Building located at 550-17th Street, NW., Washington, DC.
    Requests for further information concerning the meeting may be 
directed to Mr. Robert E. Feldman, Assistant Executive Secretary of the 
Corporation, at (202) 898-7122.

    Dated: October 3, 2006.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Robert E. Feldman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 06-8545 Filed 10-3-06; 4:18 pm]
BILLING CODE 6714-01-M
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7536

CLARENCE GARFIELD BUFFALO,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

BILL CLINTON,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert R. Merhige, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CA-94-840-3)

Submitted: January 11, 1996 Decided: January 24, 1996

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Clarence Garfield Buffalo, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant noted this appeal outside the appeal period established by Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1), failed to obtain an extension of

the appeal period within the additional thirty-day period provided

by Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), and is not entitled to relief under

Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). The time periods established by Fed. R.

App. P. 4 are "mandatory and jurisdictional." Browder v. Director,

Dep't of Corrections, 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United

States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). The district court

entered its order on January 11, 1995; Appellant's notice of appeal

was filed on September 27, 1995. Appellant's failure to note a

timely appeal or obtain an extension of the appeal period deprives

this court of jurisdiction to consider this case. We therefore deny

leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### §§ 665.213-665.219 [Reserved]
# EUR-Lex - 12008E220 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008E220

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - PART FIVE: EXTERNAL ACTION BY THE UNION - TITLE VI: THE UNION'S RELATIONS WITH INTERNATIONAL ORGANISATIONS AND THIRD COUNTRIES AND UNION DELEGATIONS - Article 220 (ex Articles 302 to 304 TEC) **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0147 - 0147 *

Article 220

(ex Articles 302 to 304 TEC)

1. The Union shall establish all appropriate forms of cooperation with the organs of the United Nations and its specialised agencies, the Council of Europe, the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe and the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.

The Union shall also maintain such relations as are appropriate with other international organisations.

2. The High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy and the Commission shall be instructed to implement this Article.

--------------------------------------------------
#### § 1223.10 What is the purpose of Part 1223?

Part 1223 specifies policies and procedures needed to establish a program to identify, protect, and manage vital records as part of an agency's continuity of operation plan designed to meet emergency management responsibilities.
§ 665.404 Permits. ( a ) *Applicability* — ( 1 ) *Guam large vessel.* The owner of any large vessel used to fish for, land, or transship Mariana bottomfish MUS or ECS shoreward of the outer boundary of the Guam subarea must have a permit issued under this section, and the permit must be registered for use with that vessel.
( 2 ) *Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (CNMI) commercial.* The owner of any vessel used to commercially fish for, transship, receive, or land Mariana bottomfish MUS or ECS shoreward of the outer boundary of the CNMI management subarea must have a permit issued under this section, and the permit must be registered for use with that vessel.
( b ) *Submission.* An application for a permit required under this section must be submitted to PIRO as described in § 665.13.
[75 FR 2205, Jan. 14, 2010, as amended at 84 FR 2774, Feb. 8, 2019]
# EUR-Lex - 12006E182 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12006E182

**Treaty establishing the European Community (consolidated version) - Part Four - Association of the overseas countries and territories - Article 182 **

*
Official Journal C 321 E , 29/12/2006 P. 0128 - 0128 Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0111 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0258 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0054 - Consolidated version (EEC Treaty - no official publication available) *

Article 182

The Member States agree to associate with the Community the non-European countries and territories which have special relations with Denmark, France, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom. These countries and territories (hereinafter called the "countries and territories") are listed in Annex II to this Treaty.

The purpose of association shall be to promote the economic and social development of the countries and territories and to establish close economic relations between them and the Community as a whole.

In accordance with the principles set out in the preamble to this Treaty, association shall serve primarily to further the interests and prosperity of the inhabitants of these countries and territories in order to lead them to the economic, social and cultural development to which they aspire.

--------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 99.1

CONSULTANCY CONTRACT
BETWEEN
STARBRIDGE GLOBAL INC.

AND
RICHARD A. PULLIA

14

---

THIS AGREEMENT is made on the 1st day of February, 2001.

BETWEEN:

| |  | StarBridge Global Inc.Suite 2, 25 Prospect Street
Box Hill Victoria 3128
Australia ("the Company");and |  | 
| |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | 
| |  | Richard A. PulliaUnit 2, 27 Hodgkinson Street
Clifton Hill Victoria 3068
Australia ("the Consultant"); |  | 

WHEREBY IT IS AGREEDas follows:

NOTE 1.INTERPRETATION

In
this Agreement, unless the context requires otherwise;



NOTE 2.ENGAGEMENT

The
Company will engage the Consultant and the Consultant will provide the service to the Company upon the terms and conditions hereafter appearing.

NOTE 3.DURATION

The
Company has engaged the Consultant with effect from December 1, 2000, until May 31, 2001, subject to termination as hereinafter provided.

NOTE 4.CONSULTANT OBLIGATION

The
Consultant shall, during the continuance of his engagement serve the Company and perform the duties and exercise the powers from time to time assigned to or vested in him by the
President of the Company and the Board, including, but not limited to, accounting services.

NOTE 5.COMPENSATION

The
compensation for the Consultant shall be 185,139 shares of free trading common stock of the Company, a consulting fee of $10,833 per month effective from February 1, 2001,
and reimbursement of approved expenses incurred on behalf of the Company.

NOTE 6.TERMINATION

15

---



NOTE 7.NOTICES

All
notices required to be given under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be addressed at the address for such party as indicated in the introductory paragraphs of this
Agreement or such address as such party may indicate from time to time.

NOTE 8.MISCELLANEOUS



IN WITNESS WHEREOFthis Agreement has been executed on the day and year first written above.

| |  | STARBRIDGE GLOBAL INC. |  |                            
| |  | ---------------------- |  | ---------------------------
| |  | Signature:             |  | /s/DAVID TURIK             
| |  | Name:                  |  | David A. Turik             
| |  | Title:                 |  | President, CEO and Director
| |  | Signature:             |  | /s/MAURICE FINK            
| |  | Name:                  |  | Maurice Fink               
| |  | Title:                 |  | Director                   
| |  | Signature:             |  | /s/WILLIE LO               
| |  | Name:                  |  | Willie Lo                  
| |  | Title:                 |  | Director                   
| |  | CONSULTANT             |  |                            
| |  | Signature:             |  | /s/RICHARD A. PULLIA       
| |  | Name:                  |  | Richard A. Pullia          

16

---
1

From: Boyd.Rochelle@epamail.epa.gov

Sent: Monday, July 12, 2010 1:58 PM

To: undisclosed-recipients

Subject: Fw: Information Collection Request for the 

Secondary Aluminum Production Source Category

From: "Rick Moore" <rmoore@aal-inc.com>

To: Rochelle Boyd/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 07/09/2010 03:34 PM

Subject: Information Collection Request for the Secondary Aluminum Production Source Category

Dear Ms. Boyd: 

 

We have been asked to provide analytical support in the way of sample analysis and data report preparation in response to the 

“Information Collection Request for the Secondary Aluminum Production Source Category”. 

 

On review of the May 27, 2010 information request letter and the Enclosure 1, I have a few questions that need your clarification 

pertaining to the baghouse dust analysis portion of this request: 

 

1. Do you have an Excel report format for the baghouse dust data? 

2. In Table 2.2 a) is EPA Method 6020 (ICP/MS) the only method allowed for Hg analysis? While Hg can be analyzed by ICP/MS it 

is not the generally preferred method. 

b) Is the sample preparation method EPA Method 3051 (Microwave Digestion) the only sample preparation method allowed or 

would other sample preparation methods be permitted (for example those that use a Parr bomb) or other digestion techniques? 

3. Concerning Hexavalent Cr analysis is EPA Method 218.6 the only acceptable method for this analysis? I have concerns that the 

method has been developed for aqueous matrices and that chlorides and 

 other metals species can cause analytical problems for this ion chromatographic method. What is the desired Reporting Limit in 

the solid material? 

 

 

Your prompt assistance with these questions would be appreciated. If you need to discuss them further I will be available either by 

phone or by email at the address below. 

 

Thank you, 

 

Rick Moore 

President 

American Analytical Laboratories, Inc. 

840 South Main Street 

Akron OH 44311 

rmoore@aal-inc.com 

ph: 330-535-1300 

fax: 330-535-7246 

[attachment "Rick Moore.vcf" deleted by Peter Westlin/RTP/USEPA/US]
Case 16-28740 Doc 1 Filed 09/08/16 Entered 09/08/16 12:42:08 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 10
Case 16-28740 Doc 1 Filed 09/08/16 Entered 09/08/16 12:42:08 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 10
Case 16-28740 Doc 1 Filed 09/08/16 Entered 09/08/16 12:42:08 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 10
Case 16-28740 Doc 1 Filed 09/08/16 Entered 09/08/16 12:42:08 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 10
Case 16-28740 Doc 1 Filed 09/08/16 Entered 09/08/16 12:42:08 Desc Main

 Document Page 5 of 10
Case 16-28740 Doc 1 Filed 09/08/16 Entered 09/08/16 12:42:08 Desc Main

 Document Page 6 of 10
Case 16-28740 Doc 1 Filed 09/08/16 Entered 09/08/16 12:42:08 Desc Main

 Document Page 7 of 10
Case 16-28740 Doc 1 Filed 09/08/16 Entered 09/08/16 12:42:08 Desc Main

 Document Page 8 of 10
Case 16-28740 Doc 1 Filed 09/08/16 Entered 09/08/16 12:42:08 Desc Main

 Document Page 9 of 10
Case 16-28740 Doc 1 Filed 09/08/16 Entered 09/08/16 12:42:08 Desc Main

 Document Page 10 of 10
# EUR-Lex - 12008E102 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008E102

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - PART THREE: UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS - TITLE VII: COMMON RULES ON COMPETITION, TAXATION AND APPROXIMATION OF LAWS - Chapter 1: Rules on competition - Section 1: Rules applying to undertakings - Article 102 (ex Article 82 TEC) **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0089 - 0089 *

Article 102

(ex Article 82 TEC)

Any abuse by one or more undertakings of a dominant position within the internal market or in a substantial part of it shall be prohibited as incompatible with the internal market in so far as it may affect trade between Member States.

Such abuse may, in particular, consist in:

(a) directly or indirectly imposing unfair purchase or selling prices or other unfair trading conditions;

(b) limiting production, markets or technical development to the prejudice of consumers;

(c) applying dissimilar conditions to equivalent transactions with other trading parties, thereby placing them at a competitive disadvantage;

(d) making the conclusion of contracts subject to acceptance by the other parties of supplementary obligations which, by their nature or according to commercial usage, have no connection with the subject of such contracts.

--------------------------------------------------
#### In the Matter of the Application of the Mayor, Aldermen and Commonalty of the City of New York, Relative to Acquiring Title to Lands Required for the Opening of East 178th Street from Creston Avenue to Ryer Avenue. Charlotte Aschenbrenner, Appellant; The City of New York et al., Respondents.

(Argued April 1, 1907;

decided April 9, 1907.)

Beal Property — Deed — Easement op Way. Where premises situated on a certain opened street are described in a conveyance thereof as being part of a certain lot on a certain map, which map shows the lot as bounded by the street in question, there is a sufficient recognition of the map to invest the purchaser with an easement of way through the street as shown, even though no street is mentioned in the conveyance.

*Malter of Mayor, etc., of New York,*114 App. Div. 912, affirmed.

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered July 12, 1906, which affirmed an order of the Special Term confirming the report of commissioners of estimate and assessment in the above-entitled proceeding.

*David*McClure, *John P.*Everett, *Ellison Crawford*and *A. A. Greenhoot*for appellant.

*Wm. B.*Ellison, *Corporation Counsel (Theodore Connoly, John P. Dunn*and *L. Dowell La Motte*of counsel), for City of New York, respondent.

*Henry B. Deylman*for property owners, respondents.

*Per Curiam.*

Under the recent decision of this court in *Reis*v. *City of New York*(188 N. Y. 58), the grantees of the various lots ¡dotted on the map of the Buckhout farm acquired private easements in the streets shown on that map only to the extent of the block in front of their respective lots and such other parts of the streets as might be necessary to obtain access to a pub]ic highway. The part of Grove street as delineated on said map, which is the subject of the award in this proceeding, was a mere cul-de-sac, and when the appellant’s testator, Green, acquired title to the lots on both *582sides of this part of Grove street the private easements were extinguished. Bnt when Green conveyed to Lock the premises. on the south side of Grove street, though he did not mention that street, he described the premises conveyed as being part of lot 7 on the Bnckhont map. This was a recognition of the map, and that map showed lot 7 as bounded on the north by an open street, Grove street. The evidence is conflicting as to whether at the time of the conveyance this part of Grove street was physically open or inclosed, and that question of fact must be assumed to have been decided against the appellant.

We are of opinion, therefore, that the commissioners could properly find that the land condemned was subject to an easement of way in favor of the owner of lot 7, and the order appealed from should be affirmed, with costs.

Cullen, Oh. J., O’Brien, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Hiscock and Chase, JJ., concur.

Order affirmed.
F OR P UBLICATION



### UNIT E D ST AT E S CO URT O F APPE AL S FO R T H E NINT H CIRCUIT

I N R E A.L .C; E.R.S.C., I nfants under the ag e of 16,

A N D R E A S C AR

LW I G , Petitioner-Appellee ,

v . S A R O D J I N Y C AR LW I G , Respondent-Appellant

. N o. 14-55671 D.C. No. 2:14-cv-01506- O DW -SH

ORDER

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Otis D. W rig ht I I , District J u dg e, Presiding

Argued and Submitted March 2, 2015—Pasadena, California
F iled April 17, 2015
B efore: Harry Preg erson, F erdinand F . F ernandez , and J acqueline H. Ng

uy en, Circuit J u d g es.I N R E A.L .C. 2 COUNSEL Matthew A. F itz g e r a l d (arg ued), Christopher Trible, a nd L auren W oods, McGuireW oods L L P, Richmond, Virg inia; L es l ie M. W erlin, Dana Palmer, Molly W hite, B lake Ols o n , and Tru c N g uy en, McGuireW oods L L P, L os Ang eles, California, for Plaintiff-Appellant. Philip D. Parr i s h (argued), Philip D. Parrish, P.A., Miami, F lorida; L a

wrence S. Katz , Mi a m i , F lorida, for D efendantAppellee. Erin C. Smith, Nancy K.D. L emon, and J ennafer Dorfman W a g n er, B erkeley , California; D onald M. F alk, May er B rown L L P, Palo Alto, Califo r nia, for Amici Curiae F amily Violence Appellate Project, California W om e n ’ s L aw Center, L eg al Momentum, W omen’s L aw Project, and Professor J ane Stoever.

ORDER Sarah C a r l wig appeals the decision and order of the district court sending A.L

. C. and E.R.S.C., d u al-nat i o n al American and S wedish children, to Sweden pursuant to the Conventio n o n the Civil Aspects of I nternational Child Abduction (the “Convention”), and its implem enting leg islation, the In ternational Child Abduction Remedies Act, 22 U.S.C.A. §§ 9001–11. W e have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.I N R E A.L .C. 3 W e hereby vacate the portion of the district court’s order, Carlwig v. Carlwig (

in re A.L.C.) , 16 F

. Supp 3d 1075 (C.D. Cal 2014), concerning the habitual residence of E.R.S.C. IT IS SO ORDERED.
#### § 1256.2 How do I obtain access to records stored in Federal Records Centers?

Agencies that retire their records to a Federal records center (FRC) set rules for access to those records. Address requests for access to records stored in Federal records centers directly to the appropriate agency or to the appropriate FRC director at the address shown in part 1253. When the agency's rules permit, NARA makes FRC records available to requesters. When the agency's rules and restrictions do not permit access FRCs receive requests that should have been sent to the agency, the FRC director refers the requests and any appeals for access, including those made under the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552, as amended), to the responsible agency.