alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1250.8 Does NARA provide access under FOIA to all the executive branch records housed at NARA facilities? ( a ) NARA provides access under FOIA to the records NARA creates (*operational* records) and records originating in the executive branch that have been transferred to the legal custody of the Archivist of the United States (*archival* records). The NARA Office of Inspector General (OIG) is an independent unit within NARA that controls access under FOIA to the operational records that OIG creates. NARA OIG handles FOIA requests it receives separately and independently from FOIA requests to NARA.
( b ) NARA's National Personnel Records Center (NPRC), located in St. Louis, Missouri, is the repository for twentieth- and twenty-first-century personnel and medical records of former members of the military and personnel records of former civilian employees of the Federal Government. ( 1 ) Those official personnel and medical files that have been transferred to NARA's legal custody are processed by NARA according to this part, at §§ 1250.20 through 1250.32.
( 2 ) Those personnel and medical records that remain in the legal custody of the agencies that created them are governed by the FOIA and other access regulations of the originating agencies, which the NPRC processes under authority delegated by the originating agencies, not under the provisions of this part. Because of the intricacies of other agencies' FOIA regulations, further explanation here is not feasible. More information about the NPRC processes, including access to NPRC records, is available on NARA's Web site at *http://www.archives.gov/st-louis/military-personnel/* and at *http://www.archives.gov/st-louis/civilian-personnel .*
( c ) NARA's Federal records centers store records that agencies no longer need for day-to-day business. These records remain in the legal custody of the agencies that created them. Requests for access to another agency's records in a NARA Federal records center should be made directly to the originating agency. We do not process FOIA requests for these records.
( d ) If your FOIA request includes a record in the legal custody of an originating agency, we forward that request to the originating agency for processing. We also provide you with notification that we have done so and with contact information for the originating agency. (See 36 CFR 1256.2 for more information about how to access records that are stored in Federal records centers.)
[79 FR 56504, Sept. 22, 2014, as amended at 82 FR 8902, Feb. 1, 2017]
# EUR-Lex - 12008E/PRO/27 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008E/PRO/27

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - PROTOCOLS - Protocol (No 27) on the internal market and competition **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0309 - 0309 *

PROTOCOL (No 27)

ON THE INTERNAL MARKET AND COMPETITION

THE HIGH CONTRACTING PARTIES,

CONSIDERING that the internal market as set out in Article 3 of the Treaty on European Union includes a system ensuring that competition is not distorted,

HAVE AGREED that:

To this end, the Union shall, if necessary, take action under the provisions of the Treaties, including under Article 352 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

This protocol shall be annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

--------------------------------------------------
BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

In the Matter of ) 

Janice Winfrey for Congress and 

Bridgette M. Dawson in her official 

capacity as treasurer; Janice Winfrey 

(EPS Dismissal) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

MUR 8045 

CERTIFICATION 

I, Vicktoria J. Allen, Deputy Secretary of the Federal Election 

Commission, do hereby certify that on February 28, 2024, the Commission 

decided by a vote of 6-0 to take the following actions in MUR 8045: 

1. Dismiss the complaint consistent with the Commission’s 

prosecutorial discretion to determine the proper ordering of its 

priorities and use of agency resources. Heckler v. Chaney, 

470 U.S. 821, 831-32 (1985), as recommended in the EPS Dismissal 

Report dated February 20, 2024. 

2. Close the file. 

3. Send the appropriate letters. 

Commissioners Broussard, Cooksey, Dickerson, Lindenbaum, Trainor, and 

Weintraub voted affirmatively for the decision. 

 Attest: 

 February 28, 2024 

 

Date Vicktoria J. Allen 

Deputy Secretary of the Commission 

Vicktoria J Allen

Digitally signed by Vicktoria J 

Allen 

Date: 2024.02.28 16:41:16 

-05'00'

MUR804500015
§ 600.205 Principal state officials and their designees. ( a ) Only a full-time state employee of the state agency responsible for marine and/or anadromous fisheries shall be appointed by a constituent state Governor as the principal state official for purposes of section 302(b) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act.
( b ) A principal state official may name his/her designee(s) to act on his/her behalf at Council meetings. Individuals designated to serve as designees of a principal state official on a Council, pursuant to section 302(b)(1)(A) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, must be a resident of the state and be knowledgeable and experienced, by reason of his or her occupational or other experience, scientific expertise, or training, in the fishery resources of the geographic area of concern to the Council.
( c ) New or revised appointments by state Governors of principal state officials and new or revised designations by principal state officials of their designees(s) must be delivered in writing to the appropriate NMFS Regional Administrator and the Council chair at least 48 hours before the individual may vote on any issue before the Council. A designee may not name another designee. Written appointment of the principal state official must indicate his or her employment status, how the official is employed by the state fisheries agency, and whether the official's full salary is paid by the state. Written designation(s) by the principal state official must indicate how the designee is knowledgeable and experienced in fishery resources of the geographic area of concern to the Council, the County in which the designee resides, and whether the designee's salary is paid by the state.
[66 FR 57888, Nov. 19, 2001]
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: FAA- 2011 - 1167 Directorate Identifier: 2011NM058AD

AIR CRUISERS A320 004 -25 - 84, R2 --- 2/11/11 AIR CRUISERS A320 004 -25 - 84, R1 --- 4/9/10 AIR CRUISERS A320 004 -25 - 84 --- 2/5/10

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplementa l AD Docket 

### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 03/05/2008
#### § 1212.635 Drug-free workplace.

*Drug-free workplace* means a site for the performance of work done in connection with a specific award at which employees of the recipient are prohibited from engaging in the unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensing, possession, or use of a controlled substance.
Merrimack,

No. 4803.

#### Cynthia V. Quamo *v.*Robert H. Quamo.

Argued January 5, 1960.

Decided January 27, 1960.

*411*Sulloway, Hollis, Godfrey & Soden (Mr. Soden*orally), for the plaintiff.

*Varney & Levy*for the defendant, furnished no brief.

Blanuin, J.

The question presented is whether the period, during which a prior divorce proceeding on the grounds of cruelty brought by the plaintiff in Massachusetts was pending, must be *412excluded as a matter of law from the statutory period in a subsequent proceeding for abandonment and refusal to cohabit under RSA 458:7 IX, when it is found as a fact that the desertion preceded the prior suit and was in no way caused or affected by it.

In *Easter*v. *Easter,*75 N. H. 270, our court established the rule that the time during which a prior libel for divorce is pending is not to be excluded as a matter of law in computing the period of abandonment. The opinion stated that the pendency of the prior action "might under some circumstances compel the inference that the separation during such pendency was consented to, or was with sufficient cause.” *Id.,*271. However, the court went on to say that this was only one evidentiary fact, not in itself controlling, and that the decisive question to be resolved by the Trial Court was whether the abandonment began and continued without fault of the plaintiff and against her will and consent. *Id.,*271, 272.

While aware of authorities which give conclusive effect to the bringing of a prior libel (anno. 41 A. L. R. 271) we believe the *Easter*.rule governs this case and is supported in other jurisdictions. *Cook*v. *Cook,*97 N. J. Eq. 264. See also, *Delgreco*v. *Delgreco,*322 Mass. 706; *Espinola*v. *Espinola,*273 Mass. 450; *Kelsall*v. *Kelsall,*139 Conn. 163.

In the case before us, the Trial Court found that the defendant’s desertion of the plaintiff preceded her suit in Massachusetts, was in no way caused or affected by it, and continued for the required period without cause and without her consent. These and all other findings are unchallenged by the defendant and are amply supported by the record. It follows that the plaintiff is entitled to a divorce, and the order is

*Remanded.*

All concurred.
**Exhibit32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of AXCESS Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the periodended June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Phillip Miller, Chief Financial Officer,and Principal Accounting and Financial Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as applicable; and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the datesand for the periods indicated.

 

 
| /S/ Phillip Miller                                                       |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Phillip Miller                                                           |
| Chief Financial  Officer, and Principal Accounting and Financial Officer |
|                                                                     |
| Dated: July 27,  2004                                               |

 

----
# EUR-Lex - 12008E204 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008E204

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - PART FOUR: ASSOCIATION OF THE OVERSEAS COUNTRIES AND TERRITORIES - Article 204 (ex Article 188 TEC) **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0139 - 0139 *

Article 204

(ex Article 188 TEC)

The provisions of Articles 198 to 203 shall apply to Greenland, subject to the specific provisions for Greenland set out in the Protocol on special arrangements for Greenland, annexed to the Treaties.

--------------------------------------------------
#### § 1231.10 Who has the authority to approve the transfer of records from the custody of one executive agency to another?

NARA must approve in writing the transfer of records from the custody of one executive agency to another, except as provided in § 1231.18(a).
#### § 1208.149 Program accessibility: Discrimination prohibited.

Except as otherwise provided in § 1208.150, no qualified individual with handicaps shall, because the agency's facilities are inaccessible to or unusable by individuals with handicaps, be denied the benefits of, be excluded from participation in, or otherwise be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity conducted by the agency.
Exhibit 32.4

               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Celtron International, Inc. on Form
10QSB for the period ending March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report'), I, Amanda Harington,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Amanada Harington
-----------------------
Amanda Harington
Chief Financial Officer
Date: May 31, 2005
#### § 1150.81 Consolidated or joint hearing.

In cases in which the same or related facts are asserted to constitute noncompliance with standards or guidelines and requirements, the judge may order all related cases consolidated and may make other orders concerning the proceedings as will be consistent with the objective of securing a just and inexpensive determination of the case without unnecessary delay.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of WNC California Housing Tax Credits II, L.P. (the “Partnership”) for the year ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), and pursuant to 18 U.S.C., section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Wilfred N. Cooper, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc., general partner of the Partnership, hereby certify that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.








/s/ WILFRED N. COOPER, JR.


Wilfred N. Cooper, Jr.


President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.


June 27, 2011
# EUR-Lex - 11957E/PRO/BEI/22 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11957E/PRO/BEI/22

**TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY, PROTOCOL ON THE STATUTE OF THE EUROPEAN INVESTMENT BANK, ARTICLE 22 **

*

*

++++

Article 22

1 . The Bank shall borrow on the international capital markets the funds necessary for the performance of its tasks .

2 . The Bank may borrow on the capital market of a Member State either in accordance with the legal provisions applying to internal issues or , if there are no such provisions in a Member State , after the Bank and the Member State concerned have conferred together and reached agreement on the proposed loan .

The competent authorities in the Member State concerned may refuse to give their assent only if there is reason to fear serious disturbances on the capital market of that State .
[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State

v. Carlock, Slip Opinion No. 2022-Ohio-4673.]

NOTICE

This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an 

advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to 

promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 

South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of any typographical or other 

formal errors in the opinion, in order that corrections may be made before 

the opinion is published.

SLIP OPINION NO. 2022-OHIO-4673

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. CARLOCK, APPELLANT.

[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it 

may be cited as State v. Carlock, Slip Opinion No. 2022-Ohio-4673.]

Appeal dismissed as having been improvidently accepted.

(No. 2022-0136―Submitted December 23, 2022―Decided December 28, 2022.)

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Jefferson County,

No. 19 JE 0017, 2021-Ohio-4550.

_________________

{¶ 1} This cause is dismissed as having been improvidently accepted.

O’CONNOR, C.J., and KENNEDY, FISCHER, DONNELLY, and BRUNNER, JJ.

DEWINE and STEWART, JJ., dissent and would order briefing and schedule 

oral argument.

_________________

Timothy Young, Ohio Public Defender, and Timothy B. Hackett, Assistant 

Public Defender, for appellant, Ka’Saun Carlock.

_________________
#### § 1212.670 Suspension.

*Suspension* means an action taken by a Federal agency that immediately prohibits a recipient from participating in Federal Government procurement contracts and covered nonprocurement transactions for a temporary period, pending completion of an investigation and any judicial or administrative proceedings that may ensue. A recipient so prohibited is suspended, in accordance with the Federal Acquisition Regulation for procurement contracts (48 CFR part 9, subpart 9.4) and the common rule, Government-wide Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement), that implements Executive Order 12549 and Executive Order 12689. Suspension of a recipient is a distinct and separate action from suspension of an award or suspension of payments under an award.
# EUR-Lex - 12004V182 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V182

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART III — THE POLICIES AND FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - TITLE III — INTERNAL POLICIES AND ACTION - CHAPTER II — ECONOMIC AND MONETARY POLICY - Section 1 — Economic policy - Article III-182 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0078 - 0078 *

Article III-182

Any measure or provision, not based on prudential considerations, establishing privileged access by Union institutions, bodies, offices or agencies, central governments, regional, local or other public authorities, other bodies governed by public law, or public undertakings of Member States to financial institutions shall be prohibited.

--------------------------------------------------
# EUR-Lex - 12008E/AFI/DCL/38 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008E/AFI/DCL/38

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - DECLARATIONS annexed to the Final Act of the Intergovernmental Conference which adopted the Treaty of Lisbon, signed on 13 December 2007 - A. DECLARATIONS CONCERNING PROVISIONS OF THE TREATIES - 38. Declaration on Article 252 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union regarding the number of Advocates-General in the Court of Justice **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0350 - 0350 *

38. Declaration on Article 252 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union regarding the number of Advocates-General in the Court of Justice

The Conference declares that if, in accordance with Article 252, first paragraph, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the Court of Justice requests that the number of Advocates-General be increased by three (eleven instead of eight), the Council will, acting unanimously, agree on such an increase.

In that case, the Conference agrees that Poland will, as is already the case for Germany, France, Italy, Spain and the United Kingdom, have a permanent Advocate-General and no longer take part in the rotation system, while the existing rotation system will involve the rotation of five Advocates-General instead of three.

--------------------------------------------------
**EXHIBIT
32**
  **CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO** **18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  I Dr.
Dennis D. Keiser, President and Chief Executive Officer of Intrepid Technology
& Resources, Inc., (the "Company") , do hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:
  ·
    the
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A as amended, of the Company for the
      quarter ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and
 ·
    the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
   Date:
April 15, 2005
 
 /s/ Dr.
Dennis D. Keiser
  ------------------------------------------------------------------
 
 Dennis D.
Keiser
  President
and Chief Executive Officer
   and,
   I Dr.
Jacob D. Dustin, Vice President, Secretary, and Treasurer of Intrepid Technology
& Resources, Inc., (the "Company") , do hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:
  ·
    the
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A as amended, of the Company for the
      quarter ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements
      of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
      and
 ·
    the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
   Date:
April 15, 2005
  /s/ Dr.
Jacob D. Dustin
 
 ----------------------------------------------------------
  Jacob D.
Dustin
  Vice
President, Secretary, and Treasurer
  (Principal
Financial Officer)
118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 5284 

AN ACT 

To increase the penalty for prohibited provision of a phone 

in a correctional facility, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 5284 ES

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Lieutenant Osvaldo 

3 Albarati Stopping Prison Contraband Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. PROHIBITED PROVISION OF A PHONE. 

5 Section 1791(b) of title 18, United States Code, is 

6 amended— 

7 (1) by redesignating paragraphs (4) and (5) as 

8 paragraphs (5) and (6), respectively; 

9 (2) by inserting after paragraph (3) the fol10 lowing: 

11 ‘‘(4) in the case of a violation of subsection 

12 (a)(1), imprisonment for not more than 2 years, or 

13 both, if the object is specified in subsection 

14 (d)(1)(F) of this section;’’; and 

15 (3) in paragraph (5), as so redesignated, by in16 serting ‘‘, in the case of a violation of subsection 

17 (a)(2),’’ before ‘‘(d)(1)(F)’’. 

18 SEC. 3. REVIEW OF POLICIES. 

19 Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment 

20 of this Act, the Director of the Bureau of Prisons shall— 

21 (1) conduct a review of the policies of the Bu22 reau of Prisons pertaining to inmates who make, 

23 possess, obtain, or attempt to make or obtain a pro24 hibited object, as defined in section 1791(d)(1) of 

25 title 18, United States Code; and 
3 

†S 5284 ES

1 (2) update those policies as needed to improve 

2 protections for incarcerated individuals and staff. 

Passed the Senate September 25, 2024. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 
118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 5284 

AN ACT 

To increase the penalty for prohibited provision of 

purposes. a phone in a correctional facility, and for other
§ 1260.32 How is the NDC administered? ( a ) The NDC is administered by a Director, who shall be appointed by the Archivist of the United States, in consultation with the Secretaries of State, Defense, Energy, and Homeland Security, the Attorney General, and the Director of National Intelligence.
( b ) The Archivist, in consultation with the representatives of the participants in the NDC and after receiving comments from the general public, shall develop priorities for declassification activities under the responsibility of the NDC that are based upon researcher interest and likelihood of declassification.