alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,640
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,124
<INVENTORY>                                      9,857
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                26,050
<PP&E>                                          59,938
<DEPRECIATION>                                  23,326
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  67,620
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,682
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            51
<OTHER-SE>                                      33,420
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    67,620
<SALES>                                         72,054
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                72,054
<CGS>                                           61,168
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   71,072
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (1,302)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   517
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,778
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (494)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        58
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (552)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   (918)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1470)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.32)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit
      32**





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63
      of
      Title 18 of the United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Severn
      Bancorp, Inc. (“Bancorp”) does hereby certify with respect to the Annual Report
      of Bancorp on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005 (the
“Report”) that:





(1)  This
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of Bancorp.





SEVERN
      BANCORP, INC.








Date:
      March 21, 2006     /s/
      Alan J. Hyatt


Alan
      J.
      Hyatt, President, Chief Executive Officer


and
      Chairman of the Board


(Principal
      Executive Officer)








Date:
      March 21, 2006      /s/
      Thomas G. Bevivino


Thomas
      G.
      Bevivino, Chief Financial Officer


(Principal
      Financial and Accounting Officer)
Exhibit 10.2
​
	
	35 Gatehouse Drive

	​
	Waltham, MA 02451

	​
	781-810-0120

	​
	entasistx.com



​
MEMORANDUM
​
To:                   [Name of Recipient]
From:               [Manager]
Date:                [Date]
Re:                   Special Bonus Award


This memorandum confirms the Special Bonus Award approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Entasis Therapeutics Holdings Inc. on May 15, 2020, as follows:
​
	​


	​


	​


	​



	Type of Award(1)
	Amount of Award(2)
	Date of Payment
	Conditions to Receipt of Award

	Private Placement Award
	$[●]
	August 31, 2020
	1) Second Closing of Private Placement completed on or before the date of payment
2) Employee remains employed with the Company on the date of payment

	ATTACK Award
	$[●]
	With first regular payroll following announcement of topline data from ATTACK clinical trial
	1) Company announcement of topline data from the ATTACK clinical trial
2) Employee remains employed with the Company on the date of payment



​
(1)       Include description of award as per eligible recipient.
(2)       Represents gross amount of award.  Applicable tax withholdings and deductions will be calculated on the date of payment.
#### § 24.11 General restrictions.

No person shall import, export, or reexport plants at any place other than at a port designated in 24.12 (hereinafter “designated port”) in accordance with the provisions of this part, unless otherwise specifically authorized by the Service at a nondesignated port in accordance with section 9(f)(1) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended.
**Anaerobic POTW Costs for Airport Deicing Fluid**

**Basis: The follow ing estimates costs on a $/gal basis for airports to ship (contract haul) and treat concentrated ADF at a POTW**  **Operation $/gal**  POTW Charge $0.08 Contract Haul Charge $0.075 **Total Cost ($/gal): $0.16**  **Equation Volume Applied x %** **recovered x 1/% in stormw**  **ater x $0.16/gal wh**  **ere % in stormw**  **ater is approximately 1%** **Gly col**  **If the Airport already**

**has the technology**

**in place and needs to increase recovery , then the equation above is multiplied by**  **the ratio.** Milwaukee Example Annual Applied (gal/yr) 152944 Block and Pump Current % recovery 30 Target Block and Pump % Recovery 40 Target Deicing Pads % Recovery 60 **Additional Annual POTW Anaerobic Cost for More Block and Pump $734,131**  **Additional Annual POTW Anaerobic Cost for Deicing Pads $734,131** **Basis: The follow ing estimates costs on a $/gal basis for airports to ship (contract haul) and treat concentrated ADF at a POTW** 

**Reference** General Mitchell SVR Site 1148, Q49 Survey **Volume Applied x % recovered x 1/%** **in stormw ater x $0.16/gal**  **wh ere %**  **in stormw ater is approximately**  **1% Gly**  **col If the Airport already** 

**has the technology**

**in place and needs to increase recovery , then the equation above is multiplied by**  **the ratio.**

Difference **$978,842 $244,710**  **$1,468,262 $734,131** **Ae robic POTW Costs for A**  **irport Deicing Fluid**

**Basis: The following estimates costs on a $/gal basis for airports to discharge A DF impacted stormwater to a POTW for aerobic treatment** 
**Ai rport ID**  **POTW A nnual Volume (gal)**  **An nual POTW Charges**  **Base Year** 1028 110,502,917 $746,499 2004 1032 986,787 $20,000 2002 1101 4,655,515 $107,089 2004 1126 7,900,000 $75,000 2004 1138 285,000,000 $974,600 2004**Basis: The following estimates costs on a $/gal basis for airports to discharge A DF impacted stormwater to a POTW for aerobic treatment** 

**2006 Costs Unit Cost ($/gal)**  $791,289 $0.01 $22,400 $0.02 $113,514 $0.02 $79,500 $0.01 $1,033,076 $0.004 **Av erage:**  $0.01
Editorial Note on Part 648
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 648 appear at 62 FR 14651, Mar. 27, 1997.

§ 648.130 Scup framework adjustments to management measures. ( a ) *Within season management action.* See § 648.110(a). ( 1 ) *Adjustment process.* The MAFMC shall develop and analyze appropriate management actions over the span of at least two MAFMC meetings. The MAFMC must provide the public with advance notice of the availability of the recommendation(s), appropriate justification(s) and economic and biological analyses, and the opportunity to comment on the proposed adjustment(s) at the first meeting and prior to and at the second MAFMC meeting. The MAFMC's recommendations on adjustments or additions to management measures must come from one or more of the following categories: Adjustments within existing ABC control rules; adjustments to the existing MAFMC risk policy; introduction of new AMs, including sub-ACTs; minimum fish size; maximum fish size; gear restrictions; gear restricted areas; gear requirements or prohibitions; permitting restrictions; recreational possession limits; recreational seasons; closed areas; commercial seasons; commercial trip limits; commercial quota system including commercial quota allocation procedure and possible quota set asides to mitigate bycatch; recreational harvest limits; annual specification quota setting process; commercial/recreational allocations; transfer provisions between the commercial and recreational sectors; FMP Monitoring Committee composition and process; description and identification of EFH (and fishing gear management measures that impact EFH); description and identification of habitat areas of particular concern; regional gear restrictions; regional season restrictions (including option to split seasons); restrictions on vessel size (LOA and GRT) or shaft horsepower; operator permits; changes to the SBRM, including the CV-based performance standard, the means by which discard data are collected/obtained, fishery stratification, the process for prioritizing observer sea-day allocations, reports, and/or industry-funded observers or observer set aside programs; any other commercial or recreational management measures; any other management measures currently included in the FMP; and set aside quota for scientific research.
( 2 ) *MAFMC recommendation.* See § 648.110(a)(2)(i) through (iv).
( 3 ) *NMFS action.* See § 648.110(a)(3)(i) through (iii).
( 4 ) *Emergency actions.* See § 648.110(a)(4).
( b ) [Reserved]
[76 FR 60635, Sept. 29, 2011, as amended at 80 FR 37196, June 30, 2015; 87 FR 68930, Nov. 17, 2022]
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 Certification of Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Rentech, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    [Intentionally Omitted];4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e) and internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrations
internal control over financial reporting;
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting.
 Date: January 28, 2008
    
    
    
    /s/ I. Merrick KerrSignature:
    
    I. Merrick KerrTitle:
    
    Chief Financial Officer
# EUR-Lex - 11992E050 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11992E050

**TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY - PART THREE: COMMUNITY POLICIES - TITLE III: FREE MOVEMENT OF PERSONS, SERVICES AND CAPITAL - CHAPTER 1: WORKERS - ARTICLE 50 /* CODIFIED VERSION OF THE TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY */ **

*
Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0021 *

Article 50

Member States shall, within the framework of a joint programme, encourage the exchange of young workers.
# EUR-Lex - 12004V244 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V244

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART III — THE POLICIES AND FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - TITLE III — INTERNAL POLICIES AND ACTION - CHAPTER III — POLICIES IN OTHER AREAS - Section 7 — Transport - Article III-244 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0107 - 0107 *

Article III-244

An Advisory Committee consisting of experts designated by the governments of the Member States shall be attached to the Commission. The Commission, whenever it considers it desirable, shall consult the Committee on transport matters.

--------------------------------------------------
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

OCTOBER 22, 2010

JOHN LEY

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 09-15613

D. C. Docket No. 06-00507-CV-RS

GUERRY WAYNE HERTZ, 

Petitioner-Appellant, 

versus

WALTER A. MCNEIL,

CHARLES J. CRIST, JR., 

 

Respondents-Appellees.

 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Florida 

 

(October 22, 2010)

Before TJOFLAT, CARNES and MARCUS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
The sole issue on which a certificate of appealability was granted in this

capital case is whether the Florida Supreme Court’s decision that Hertz was not

denied effective assistance of counsel in regard to the presentation of mental

health mitigating circumstances evidence at the penalty state, Hertz v. State, 941

So. 2d 1031, 1037-45 (Fla.2006), was contrary to or an unreasonable application

of clearly established federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the

United States, 28 U.S.C. ¶ 2254(d)(1).

In denying Hertz’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus, the district court set

out all of the facts relating to this issue, all of Hertz’s arguments about it, and all

of the reasons those arguments lack merit. See Hertz v. McNeil, No. 4:06cv507-

RS, 2009 WL 3161813, at *15-31 (N.D. Fla. Sept. 25, 2009). Having read the

briefs and the relevant parts of the record, and having listened to oral argument,

we fully agree with the district court that the Florida Supreme Court’s decision

that Hertz’s trial counsel provided reasonable professional assistance during the

penalty stage of his capital trial is not contrary to or an unreasonable application of

clearly established federal law.

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

2
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Delta Regional Authority","provider_url":"https:\/\/dra.gov","author_name":"Aha! Creative","author_url":"https:\/\/dra.gov\/author\/admin\/","title":"Enabling Legislation - Delta Regional Authority","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"KxpEE9nx5b\"><a href=\"https:\/\/dra.gov\/about\/enabling-legislation\/\">Enabling Legislation<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/dra.gov\/about\/enabling-legislation\/embed\/#?secret=KxpEE9nx5b\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Enabling Legislation” — Delta Regional Authority\" data-secret=\"KxpEE9nx5b\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"Congressional Authorization In 2000, the Consolidated Appropriations Act for FY2001 (P.L. 106-554) included language authorizing the creation of the DRA based on the seven participating states of the Lower Mississippi Delta Development Commission (LMDDC), with the addition of Alabama. The Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2008, more commonly known as the 2008 Farm […]"}
§ 23.79 How may I participate in the Plant Rescue Center Program? ( a ) *Purpose.* We have established the Plant Rescue Center Program to place confiscated live plants quickly to prevent physical damage to the plants.
( b ) *Criteria.* Institutions interested in participating in this program must be: ( 1 ) Nonprofit, open to the public, and have the expertise and facilities to care for confiscated exotic plant specimens. A participating institution may be a botanical garden, arboretum, zoological park, research institution, or other qualifying institution.
( 2 ) Willing to transfer confiscated plants from the port where they were confiscated to their facilities at their own expense.
( 3 ) Willing to return the plants to the U.S. Government if the country of export has requested their return. The U.S. Government will then coordinate the plants' return to the country of export.
( 4 ) Willing to accept and maintain a plant shipment as a unit until it has received authorization from us to incorporate the shipment into its permanent collection or transfer a portion of it to another participating institution.
( c ) *Participation.* Institutions wishing to participate in the Plant Rescue Center Program should contact the U.S. Management Authority (see § 23.7). They must provide a brief description of the greenhouse or display facilities, the names and telephone numbers of any individuals authorized to accept plants on behalf of the institution, and the mailing address where the plants should be sent. In addition, interested institutions must indicate if they are limited with regard to the type of plants they are able to maintain or the quantities of plants they can handle at one time.
§ 1002.38 Explosives. ( a ) Using, possessing, storing, or transporting explosives, blasting agents or explosive materials is prohibited, except pursuant to the terms and conditions of a permit. When permitted, the use, possession, storage and transportation shall be in accordance with applicable Federal and State laws.
( b ) Using or possessing fireworks and firecrackers is prohibited, except pursuant to the terms and conditions of a permit or in designated areas under such conditions as the Board may establish, and in accordance with applicable State law.
( c ) Violation of the conditions established by the Board or of the terms and conditions of a permit issued in accordance with this section is prohibited and may result in the suspension or revocation of the permit.
823 P.2d 162

#### Stanley “Tex” LAW, Claimant-Respondent, v. OMARK INDUSTRIES, Employer, and Wausau Insurance Companies, Surety, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 18945.

Supreme Court of Idaho, Boise, October 1991 Term.

Jan. 3, 1992.

Edgar L. Annan, Spokane, Wash., for defendants-appellants.

Robert J. Van Idour, Lewiston, for claimant-respondent.

PER CURIAM.

This is a workers’ compensation case. The issue we find dispositive is the lack of a final decision or order of the Industrial Commission. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal.

Stanley “Tex” Law was injured while working for Omark Industries in 1985. In 1989, Law received surgery for a condition he alleged was the result of the 1985 injury. Omark and its surety denied payment for the surgery. Law applied for a hearing before the Commission, seeking compensation for medical treatment and attorney fees, but not for impairment and disability benefits.

Following a hearing, the Commission found that the question of impairment and disability benefits was not properly brought before the Commission at that time because the issue was not presented in the application for hearing or argued during the hearing, and because Law’s condition had not stabilized. The Commission awarded Law reasonable medical benefits relating to the 1985 accident, including benefits for the operation performed in 1989. The Commission did not award attorney fees. Omark and its surety appealed.

As we have ruled in *Jensen v. Pillsbury Co.,*— Idaho -, 823 P.2d 161 (1992) released this same day, there is no final order by the Commission as is required by I.A.R. 11(d). Therefore, we dismiss the appeal, without prejudice and without costs, and remand the case to the Commission.