alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-4960

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus DONNIE WAYNE BOWMAN, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. John T. Copenhaver, Jr., District Judge. (CR-04-38) Submitted: April 19, 2006 Decided: April 28, 2006 Before WILLIAMS and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mary Lou Newberger, Federal Public Defender, Jonathan D. Byrne, Appellant Counsel, David R. Bungard, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellant. Charles T. Miller, Acting United States Attorney, Joshua C. Hanks, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Donnie Wayne Bowman appeals the sixty-three-month sentence imposed after a jury found him guilty of being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) (2000), and possessing a stolen firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(j) (2000). Bowman challenges the reasonableness of his sentence, contending that it is longerthan necessary to comply with the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C.A. § 3553(a)(2) (West 2000 & Supp. 2005). We find, however, that the district court sentenced Bowman only after appropriately considering and examining the sentencing guidelines and the § 3553(a) factors, as instructed by United States v. Booker , 543 U.S. 220 (2005). The court sentenced Bowman within the applicable advisory guideline range and well below the ten-year statutory maximum set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 924(a)(2) (2000). We cannot conclude that, under these circumstances, Bowman’s sentence is unreasonable. See United States v. Green , 436 F.3d 449, 457 (4th Cir. 2006) (finding that sentence imposed within properly calculated advisory guidelines range is presumptively reasonable); see also United States v. Johnson , F.3d , , 2006 WL 893594, at *6 (4th Cir. Apr. 7, 2006) (No. 05-4378) (finding that district court’s “detailed inquiry into the various circumstances bearing upon [defendant’s] sentence” satisfied court ’s obligation to consider § 3553(a) factors).- 3 - Accordingly, we affirm the sentence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
§ 1004.15 Safety belts. ( a ) Each operator and passenger occupying any seating position of a motor vehicle in the area administered by the Presidio Trust will have the safety belt or child restraint system properly fastened at all times when the vehicle is in motion. The safety belt and child restraint system will conform to applicable United States Department of Transportation standards.
( b ) This section does not apply to an occupant in a seat that was not originally equipped by the manufacturer with a safety belt nor does it apply to a person who can demonstrate that a medical condition prevents restraint by a safety belt or other occupant restraining device.
§ 665.409 Guam Annual Catch Limits (ACL). ( a ) In accordance with § 665.4, the ACL for Mariana bottomfish MUS in the Guam Management Subarea is 31,000 lb.
( b ) When NMFS projects the ACL will be reached, the Regional Administrator shall publish a document to that effect in the Federal Register and shall use other means to notify permit holders. The document will include an advisement that the fishery will be closed, beginning at a specified date that is not earlier than seven days after the date of filing the closure notice for public inspection at the Office of the Federal Register, through the end of the fishing year in which the catch limit is reached.
( c ) If the ACL is exceeded in any fishing year, the Regional Administrator shall publish a document to that effect in the Federal Register and shall use other means to notify permit holders. The document will include an advisement that the fishery will be closed, beginning at a specified date that is not earlier than seven days after the date of filing the closure notice for public inspection at the Office of the Federal Register. The fishery will remain closed until such time that a coordinated approach to management is developed and regulations are implemented that ensures catch in both Federal and territorial waters can be maintained at levels that allow the stock to rebuild or the rebuilding plan is modified based on the best scientific information available.
( d ) On and after the date the fishery is closed as specified in paragraphs (b) or (c) of this section, fishing for and possession of Mariana bottomfish MUS is prohibited in the Guam Management Subarea, except as otherwise authorized by law.
( e ) On and after the date the fishery is closed as specified in paragraphs (b) or (c) of this section, sale, offering for sale, and purchase of any Mariana bottomfish MUS caught in the Guam Management Subarea is prohibited.
[87 FR 9272, Feb. 18, 2022]
# EUR-Lex - 12005S/TTE/01 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12005S/TTE/01

**Treaty between the Kingdom of Belgium, the Czech Republic, the Kingdom of Denmark, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Republic of Estonia, the Hellenic Republic, the Kingdom of Spain, the French Republic, Ireland, the Italian Republic, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the Republic of Austria, the Republic of Poland, the Portuguese Republic, the Republic of Slovenia, the Slovak Republic, the Republic of Finland, the Kingdom of Sweden, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (Member States of the European Union) and the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania, concerning the accession of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania to the European Union - Article 1 **

*
Official Journal L 157 , 21/06/2005 P. 0017 - 0017 *

Article 1

1. The Republic of Bulgaria and Romania hereby become members of the European Union.

2. The Republic of Bulgaria and Romania become Parties to the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe and to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community as amended or supplemented.

3. The conditions and arrangements for admission are set out in the Protocol annexed to this Treaty. The provisions of that Protocol shall form an integral part of this Treaty.

4. The Protocol, including its Annexes and Appendices, shall be annexed to the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe and to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and its provisions shall form an integral part of those Treaties.

--------------------------------------------------
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.3


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


         In connection with the December 31, 2002 Form 10-QSB/A of Intrepid
Technology & Resources, Inc., (the "Company") as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Dr. Dennis D. Keiser,
certify that the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

         This certificate is being furnished solely for purposes of Section 906
and is not being filed as part of the Periodic Report.

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Intrepid Technology & Resources, Inc., and will be retained by
Intrepid Technology & Resources, Inc., and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


Dated: June 13, 2003


/s/ Dr. Dennis D. Keiser


--------------------------------

Dennis D. Keiser

President and Chief Executive Officer



                                       22
# EUR-Lex - 11992E201 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11992E201

**TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY - PART FIVE : INSTITUTIONS OF THE COMMUNITY - TITLE II : FINANCIAL PROVISIONS - ARTICLE 201 /* CODIFIED VERSION OF THE TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY */ **

*
Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0070 *

Article 201

Without prejudice to other revenue, the budget shall be financed wholly from own resources.

The Council, acting unanimously on a proposal from the Commission and after consulting the European Parliament, shall lay down provisions relating to the system of own resources of the Community, which it shall recommend to the Member States for adoption in accordance with their respective constitutional requirements.
§ 296.9 Initial determination. The Chief, FSD will make an initial determination on a claim within 60 days after the day on which the claim is accepted for filing. The initial determination will state: ( a ) If the claim is disapproved, the reason for disapproval, or
( b ) If the claim is approved, the amount of compensation and the basis on which the amount was determined.
1 Kelly, Shaheerah

From: Kelly, Shaheerah Sent: Monday, January 06, 2014 1:23 PM To: hswriter@frontiernet.net Cc: R9AirPermits Subject: RE:

Ms. Strand,

The pollutants covered under the PSD permit are addresse d in section 4 of the Ambient Air Quality Impact Report (AAQIR) issued for public comment on November 8, 2013. The AAQIR also discusses the emissions levels that trigger PSD permitting require ments. Here is a link to the AAQIR : http://www.epa.gov/region9/air/permit/pdf/spi -anderson/2013-11-spi-anderson-ghg-aaqir.pdf

The 10 / 25 ton per year thresholds referenced in your email are the levels of h azardous air pollutants (HAPs) listed in section 112(b) of the Clean Air Act that trigger the requireme nt to obtain an operating permit under Clean Air Act Title V. Carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) is not included on section 112(b) HAPs list. The regulations for issuing Title V operating permits are at 40 CFR pa rt 70. Shasta County AQMD is the Title V permitting authority for facilities in Shasta County. The AQMD has an approved Title V operating permit program and has regulations that EPA has approved as meeting the requirements of 40 CFR part 70. AQMD’s Title V operating permit regulations can be found at this link (see Rule V): http://www.arb.ca.gov/drdb/sha/cur.htm

************************************ Shaheerah Kelly Permits Office, Air Division (AIR-3) U.S. Environmental Protec tion Agency, Region 9 San Francisco, CA 94105 Phone: 415-947-4156 Fax: 415-947-3579 Email: kelly.shaheerah@epa.gov

From: hswriter@frontiernet.net [ mailto:hswriter@frontiernet.net ] Sent: Friday, December 20, 2013 9:31 AM To: Kelly, Shaheerah Cc: Jordan, Deborah Subject:

December 20, 2013

Dear Shaheerah,

To better understand the permit I am commenting on (SAC 12-01) I need to make sure I have the law straight.

It is my understanding that under the Clean Air Act, A PSD permit is required if a stationary source of pollution will emit "10 tons per year or more of any hazardous air pollutant or 25 tons per year or more of any combination of hazardous air pollutants."2 Because of the ruling in favor of The Center for Biological Diversity, Co2 emissions must be included in that 10/25 ton calculation.

Thank you for your ongoing help.

Sincerely, Heidi Strand
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED February 15, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-50870 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus MARTIN R. GUERRERO, JR., Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 5:91-CR-318-1

-------------------- Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Martin R. Guerrero, Jr., federal prisoner # 43281-080, appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for modification of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A), pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, or, in the alternative, a writ of coram nobis. He argues that the district court erred in denying relief on his claims that (1) he is entitled to release, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A), based on his heart condition, and (2) his sentence is illegal because it was based on facts not submitted to the jury and proved beyond a reasonable doubt inNo. 04-50870 -2- violation of Blakely v. Washington , 542 U.S. 296 (2004) and United States v. Booker , 125 S. Ct. 738, 755-56 (2005). Guerrero does not argue that he has an illness from which he will die within one year or that his medical condition has rendered him unable to provide self-care. Thus, he has not shown that the Bureau of Prisons abused its discretion in applying its interpretive rule restricting the application of 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i) to inmates who have been diagnosed with medical conditions that are terminal within one year or who suffer from severely debilitating and irreversible conditions that render them unable to provide self-care. This claim is without merit.
Because Guerrero’s Blakely / Booker argument seeks to challenge alleged sentencing errors, a § 2255 motion was the appropriate vehicle in which to raise the claims absent a showing that the remedy provided under § 2255 was inadequate or ineffective to test the legality of his detention. See Padilla v. United States , 416 F.3d 424, 425-26 (5th Cir. 2005)

. Guerrero’s claims do not fall within this exception, otherwise known as § 2255's “savings clause” because Booker is not retroactively applicable to cases on collateral review. Padilla , 416 F.3d at 427. Thus, his sentencing challenge is not cognizable in a § 2241 petition. Id. The district court did not err in denying Guerrero’s § 2241 petition. Guerrero’s motion to “Include Information” is treated as a motion to file a supplemental brief and is DENIED.No. 04-50870 -3-
AFFIRMED; MOTION DENIED.
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                              18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                              AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                   SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Annual Report of Food Technology Service, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Richard G. Hunter, Chief
Executive and Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company at the end of, and for, this period covered by the Report.

August 4, 2008


                                                /s/  Richard G. Hunter, Ph.D.
                                                  ---------------------------
                                                     Richard G. Hunter, Ph.D.,
                                                     Chief Executive Officer
                                                     and Chief Financial Officer
Home About Our Companies

Our Companies

Learn more about the companies.

San Diego Gas & Electric 

(http://www.sempra.com/about/ourcompanies/SDGE.shtml) 

Southern California Gas Co. 

(http://www.sempra.com/about/ourcompanies/southern-california-gasco.shtml) 

Sempra U.S. Gas & Power 

(http://www.sempra.com/about/ourcompanies/semprausgp.shtml) 

Sempra International 

(http://www.sempra.com/about/ourcompanies/semprainternational.shtml) 

LNG 

(http://www.sempralng.com/) 

Sempra Energy’s California utilities, San Diego Gas & Electric Co. and Southern California Gas Co., serve more than 20 million consumers. And its other businesses – Sempra U.S. 

Gas & Power and Sempra International – develop and operate critical energy infrastructure and provide gas and electricity services in North America and South America.

 Pipelines

1

 Joint Venture with BP Wind Energy

2

 Joint Venture with Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P. and ConocoPhillips

Not to scale 

Not to scale 

Sempra U.S. Gas & Power, LLC and Sempra International, LLC are not the same company as the California utilities, San Diego Gas & Electric (SDG&E) or Southern California Gas Company (SoCalGas), and Sempra U.S. Gas & Power, LLC and Sempra International, 

LLC are not regulated by the California Public Utilities Commission. 

Note: Formerly known as entities Sempra Generation, Sempra LNG and Sempra Pipelines & Storage have now been realigned under Sempra International and Sempra U.S. Gas & Power. 

Sempra Energy | Our Companies Page 1 of 1

http://www.sempra.com/about/our-companies/ 7/31/2015
###### Editorial Note on Part 648

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 648 appear at 62 FR 14651, Mar. 27, 1997.

#### § 648.16 Penalties.

See § 600.735.
§ 86.76 How can I use the logo for BIG? ( a ) You must use the Sport Fish Restoration logo on: ( 1 ) BIG-funded facilities;
( 2 ) Printed or Web-based material or other visual representations of BIG projects or achievements; and
( 3 ) BIG-funded or BIG-related educational and informational material.
( b ) You must require a subgrantee to display the logo in the places and on materials described at paragraph (a) of this section.
( c ) Businesses that contribute to or receive from the Trust Fund that we describe at § 86.30 may display the logo in conjunction with its associated products or projects.
( d ) The Assistant Director or Regional Director may authorize other persons, organizations, agencies, or governments not identified in this section to use the logo for purposes related to BIG by entering into a written agreement with the user. The user must state how it intends to use the logo, to what it will attach the logo, and the relationship to BIG.
( e ) The Service and the Department of the Interior make no representation or endorsement whatsoever by the display of the logo as to the quality, utility, suitability, or safety of any product, service, or project associated with the logo.
( f ) The user of the logo must indemnify and defend the United States and hold it harmless from any claims, suits, losses, and damages from: ( 1 ) Any allegedly unauthorized use of any patent, process, idea, method, or device by the user in connection with its use of the logo, or any other alleged action of the user; and
( 2 ) Any claims, suits, losses, and damages arising from alleged defects in the articles or services associated with the logo.
( g ) No one may use any part of the logo in any other manner unless the Service's Assistant Director for Wildlife and Sport Fish Restoration or Regional Director authorizes it. Unauthorized use of the logo is a violation of 18 U.S.C. 701 and subjects the violator to possible fines and imprisonment.
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C.

 

 March 11, 2024 

VIA EMAIL AND CERTIFIED MAIL

RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED

smcphail@citizensforethics.org 

Noah Bookbinder 

Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington 

1331 F Street NW, Ste. 900 

Washington, DC 20004 

 RE: MUR 8082 

 Unknown Respondents, et al.

 

Dear Mr. Bookbinder: 

 The Federal Election Commission has considered the allegations contained in your 

complaint dated October 27, 2024, but there was an insufficient number of votes to find reason to 

believe Unknown Respondents; Florida Promise, Inc.; The Center for Advancement of Integrity 

and Justice; Grow United, Inc.; Broken Promises; or Stand Up for Justice violated the Federal 

Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended, or to dismiss the complaint. Accordingly, on 

February 27, 2024, the Commission closed the file in this matter. A Statement of Reasons 

providing a basis for the Commission's decision will follow.

 Documents related to the case will be placed on the public record within 30 days. See 

Disclosure of Certain Documents in Enforcement and Other Matters, 81 Fed. Reg. 50,702 (Aug. 

2, 2016). 

 If you have any questions, please contact me at (202) 694-1688 or mlupo@fec.gov. 

 Sincerely,

 

 Matthew Lupo

Attorney 

 

MUR808200486
# EUR-Lex - 12004V260 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V260

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART III — THE POLICIES AND FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - TITLE III — INTERNAL POLICIES AND ACTION - CHAPTER IV — AREA OF FREEDOM, SECURITY AND JUSTICE - Section 1 — General provisions - Article III-260 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0113 - 0113 *

Article III-260

Without prejudice to Articles III-360 to III-362, the Council may, on a proposal from the Commission, adopt European regulations or decisions laying down the arrangements whereby Member States, in collaboration with the Commission, conduct objective and impartial evaluation of the implementation of the Union policies referred to in this Chapter by Member States' authorities, in particular in order to facilitate full application of the principle of mutual recognition. The European Parliament and national Parliaments shall be informed of the content and results of the evaluation.

--------------------------------------------------
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT, NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, EASTERN DIVISION

RE: FRANCESCO PERFETTI ) Case No. 16 B 28155

)
Debtor )} Chapter 13

)
) Judge: JANET S BAER

ORDER CONFIRMING PLAN

The pian under Chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy Code, filed as docket no. 21,
having been found by the court to comply with the provisions of 11 U.S.C. § 1325, THE PLAN

IS HEREBY CONFIRMED.

All property of the estate, as specified in 11 U.S.C. §§ 541 and 1306, will continue to be
property of the estate following confirmation, unless(1) the plan provides for surrender of the

property, or (2) the property is sold pursuant to the plan or court order.

ENTER:

~3 NOV 2016 JGh

DATED:

Non-Binding Plan Summary:

Monthly Pymt, Tem Est, Unsec%
1118.10 60 100
Searched for **https://www.ssa.gov/pubs/EN-05-10088.pdf**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **https://www.ssa.gov/pubs/EN-05-10088.pdf**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Integrated Environmental Technologies, Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Thomas S. Gifford, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)           the Report fully complies with the requirements of §13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, 15 U.S.C. §78m or 78o(d), and,





(2)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




August 22, 2011                                                                      By: /s/ Thomas S. Gifford


Thomas S. Gifford


Executive Vice President,


Chief Financial Officer and Secretary