alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of United American Healthcare Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, William C. Brooks, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
          the Company.

Dated August 31, 2006


                                        By: /s/ William C. Brooks
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            President & Chief Executive Officer
                                            (principal executive officer)
SUPREME COURT.

#### Joseph Benninghoff agt. Thomas Oswell.

Where a person is improperly arrested on an alleged criminal charge committed in Canada, and is *detained*under such arrest for the probable purpose of compelling him to settle a demand claimed to have been fraudulently made in Canada, and such purpose proving ineffectual, an order of arrest in a civil action is obtained and he is arrested under it:

*Held*a clear abuse of the *process of the*law, which cannot be sanctioned by the court. Order of arrest set aside with costs.

*Chautauqua Special*Term, 1868.

Motion to discharge defendant from arrest.

H. A. Swartz and W. W. Holt, *for defendant.*

C. D. Murray, *for plaintiff.*

Daniels, J.

As the offense of the defendant was committed in the province of Canada, and he was in no way amenable for it under the laws of this state, his arrest and detention upon the criminal process issued in the county of Chautauqua must have been made for some other purpose than his prosecution and punishment as a criminal. The probabilities are, that it was for the purpose of coercing him into a compromise or adjustment of the plaintiff’s demand, for the money he alleged had been obtained from him by the defendant by means of the fraudulent representations made by him, at St. Catherines in Canada. After that was discovered to be ineffectual, the defendant appears to have been detained in custody under the same process, until an order for his arrest in a civil action could - be obtained, and his arrest could be, and was, made under it.

This was a cjear abuse of the process of the law, and the arrest made by means of it should not therefore be sane*236tioned by the court under whose order it was accomplished. *(Wells*agt. *Gurney,*8 *Bar. and Cress.,*769; 15 *Eng. Com. Law, 336 ; Snelling*agt. *Watrous, 2 Paige,*314; *Williams*agt. *Bacon,*10 *Wend.,*636 ; *Carpenter*agt. *Spooner, 2 Sand.,*717; *Goupil*agt. *Simonson,*3 *Abb.,*474.)

The motion to set aside the arrest must therefore be granted with $10 costs.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Delta Regional Authority","provider_url":"https:\/\/dra.gov","author_name":"Aha! Creative","author_url":"https:\/\/dra.gov\/author\/admin\/","title":"Annual Report - Delta Regional Authority","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"ssiVfbneXL\"><a href=\"https:\/\/dra.gov\/accountability\/annual-report\/\">Annual Report<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/dra.gov\/accountability\/annual-report\/embed\/#?secret=ssiVfbneXL\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Annual Report” — Delta Regional Authority\" data-secret=\"ssiVfbneXL\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"An annual report is submitted to Congress each year to identify DRA investments and program outcomes.\u00a0 See below to read or download past issues: 2022 Annual Report 2020 Year in Review 2019 Year in Review 2018 Year in Review 2017 Year in Review"}
Your session is about to expire.Resume session

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Welcome.Log inorregisterCOPS OFFICE RESOURCE CENTER

HomeCatalogCartOrders

                    

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                CatalogMatches: 1Offline form Recent Popular Online Print OtherCOPS-W0686The COPS Collaboration Toolkit: How to Build, Fix, and Sustain Productive PartnershipsThis toolkit provides practical guidance to law enforcement agencies as they develop and sustain partnerships that support community policing. The toolkit will benefit law enforcement personnel, community-based organizations, educators, youth, government officials, and others seeking to combine efforts to reduce crime and social disorder problems.By Tammy A. Rinehart, Anna T. Laszlo, Gwen O. BriscoeCategories: Community PartnershipsLanguage: EnglishPublic linkhttps://portal.cops.usdoj.gov/resourcecenter?item=cops-w0686Click here to see the entire catalog.Cart:Download PDFWeb • Oct 2005Search catalogreset title abstract authors contentContaining text: exact phraseNot containing text: exact phraseLanguage:anyEnglishSpanishHmongVietnameseCategory:anyAlternatives to IncarcerationCommunity PartnershipsData and AnalysisEthics and IntegrityFoundations of Community PolicingHiring, Recruitment, and RetentionHomeland SecurityNew Immigrant CommunitiesNonviolent CrimeOtherPolice OperationsPOP Center ResourceSchool and Campus SafetyTechnologyTribalViolent CrimeYouth SafetyPublished after:Published before:Page1

                    

FOIA | No FEAR Act | Open Government | Privacy | Legal|HelpCopyright (C) U.S. Department of Justice, COPS Office, IT Division, 2012 - 2024. All rights reserved.
Rendered on Mon Mar 4 2024 at 05:54 (UTC-5) in 0.20 secEnterprise Framework 3.21.7.7 • Store Controls 3.3.1.7Survey 500303407 Section 60000560 Rules Hints Inactive
#### § 1005.24 Costs of bringing product into compliance.

The costs of supervising the operations necessary to bring a product into compliance with the Act shall be paid by the owner or consignee who files an application pursuant to [§ 1005.21](/on/2024-09-23/title-21/section-1005.21) and executes a bond under section 360(b) of the Act. Such costs shall include:

(a) Travel expenses of the supervising officer;

(b) Per diem in lieu of subsistence of the supervising officer when away from his or her home station, as provided by law;

(c)

(1) The charge for the services of the supervising officer, which shall include administrative support, shall be computed at a rate per hour equal to 267 percent of the hourly rate of regular pay of a grade GS-11/4 employee, except that such services performed by a customs officer and subject to the provisions of the act of February 13, 1911, as amended (section 5, 36 Stat. 901, as amended ([19 U.S.C. 267](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/19/267))), shall be calculated as provided in that act.

(2) The charge for the services of the analyst, which shall include administrative and laboratory support, shall be computed at a rate per hour equal to 267 percent of the hourly rate of regular pay of a grade GS-12/4 employee.

(3) The rate per hour equal to 267 percent of the equivalent hourly rate of regular pay of the supervising officer (GS-11/4) and the analyst (GS-12/4) is computed as follows:

Table 1 to Paragraph (c)(3)

| | Hours |
| --- | --- |
| Gross number of working hours in 52 40-hour weeks | 2,080 |
| Less: | |
| 10 legal public holidays—New Year's Day, Birthday of Martin Luther King, Jr., Washington's Birthday, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Columbus Day, Veterans Day, Thanksgiving Day, and Christmas Day | 80 |
| Annual Leave—26 days | 208 |
| Sick Leave—13 days | 104 |
| Total | 392 |
| Net number of working hours | 1,688 |
| Gross number of working hours in 52 40-hour weeks | 2,080 |
| Working hour equivalent of Government contributions for employee retirement, life insurance, and health benefits computed at 81/2% of annual rate of pay of employee | 176 |
| Equivalent annual working hours | 2,256 |
| Support required to equal to 1 person-year | 2,256 |
| Equivalent gross annual working hours charged to Food and Drug appropriation | 4,512 |
| | |
| --- | --- |
| **Note:** Ratio of equivalent gross annual number of working hours charged to Food and Drug appropriation to net number of annual working hours (4,512/1,688) = 267 pct. | |

(d) The minimum charge for services of supervising officers shall be not less than the charge for 1 hour and time after the first hour shall be computed in multiples of 1 hour, disregarding fractional parts less than one-half hour.

[[38 FR 28630](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/38-FR-28630), Oct. 15, 1973, as amended at [42 FR 55207](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/42-FR-55207), Oct. 14, 1977; [42 FR 62130](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/42-FR-62130), Dec. 9, 1977; [85 FR 50783](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/85-FR-50783), Aug. 18, 2020]
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 191 (Tuesday, October 3, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58420-58421]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-8449]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institutes of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as

[[Page 58421]]

amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institutes of Neurological Disorders 
and Stroke Initial Review Group, Neurological Sciences and Disorders 
K.
    Date: October 19-20, 2006.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Embassy Suites Hotel Atlanta, 267 Marietta Street, 
Atlanta, GA 30303.
    Contact Person: Katherine M. Woodbury, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Scientific Review Branch, NINDS/NIH/DHHS, 
Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Blvd., Suite 3208, MSC 9529, 
Bethesda, MD 20892-9529. 301-496-9223.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.853, 
Clinical Research Related to Neurological Disorders; 93.854, 
Biological Basis Research in the Neurosciences, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 26, 2006.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 06-8449 Filed 10-2-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### § 70.8 Range and feral animal management.

The range and feral animal management provisions set forth in part 30 of this chapter are equally applicable to national fish hatchery areas.
§ 1192.101 Lighting. ( a ) Any stepwell or doorway with a lift, ramp or bridge plate shall have, when the door is open, at least 2 footcandles of illumination measured on the step tread, ramp, bridge plate, or lift platform.
( b ) The doorways of cars not operating at lighted station platforms shall have outside lights which, when the door is open, provide at least 1 footcandle of illumination on the station platform surface for a distance of 3 feet perpendicular to all points on the bottom step tread edge. Such lights shall be shielded to protect the eyes of entering and exiting passengers.
<PAGE>




                                                                    Exhibit 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Everflow Eastern Partners, L.P. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
William A. Siskovic, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/  William A. Siskovic
------------------------------------
William A. Siskovic
Chief Financial Officer
March 27, 2003
# EUR-Lex - 12004V/AFI/DCL/27 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V/AFI/DCL/27

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - FINAL ACT - A.Declarations concerning provisions of the Constitution - 27.Declaration on Article III-419 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0463 - 0463 *

27. Declaration on Article III-419

The Conference declares that Member States may indicate, when they make a request to establish enhanced cooperation, if they intend already at that stage to make use of Article III-422 providing for the extension of qualified majority voting or to have recourse to the ordinary legislative procedure.

--------------------------------------------------
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

         We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-38958, 333-50159, 333-47601, 333-14895, and
333-70510) of Whitehall Jewellers, Inc. of our report dated March 22, 2004
(except for the last paragraph of Note 20 as to which the date is April 15,
2004) relating to the financial statements, which appears in the Annual Report
to Shareholders, which is incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We
also consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated March 22,
2004 relating to the financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form
10-K.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Chicago, Illinois

April 15, 2004
Case 16-27602 Doc 8 Filed 08/30/16 Entered 08/31/16 08:58:16 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 99-2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Innovative  Software  Technologies,
Inc.  (the  "Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending June 30, 2002,  as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  I,  Douglas S.  Hackett,  Chief  Financial  Officer of the  Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

                  (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  (2) the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,
                  in all material respects,  the financial  condition and result
                  of operations of the Company.

/S/ Douglas S. Hackett
---------------------------
    Douglas S. Hackett
    Chief Financial Officer
    August 14, 2002
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-6351

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus THOMAS LEE WILLIAMS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (CR-95-1, CA-98-2091-4-22) Submitted: August 31, 1999 Decided: September 21, 1999 Before LUTTIG and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Thomas Lee Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Scarlett Anne Wilson, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).1 We note that there is no recognized authority in this Circuit allowing the district court to grant Williams an extension of time in which to file his § 2255 motion. We decline to address this issue, however, because Williams’ claims were properly denied on the merits. 2 Although the district court’s order is marked as “filed” on January 14, 1999, the district court’s records show that it was entered on the docket sheet on January 19, 1999. Pursuant to Rules 58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the date that the order was physically entered on the docket sheet that we take as the effective date of the district court’s decision. See Wilson v. Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986). 2 PER CURIAM: Thomas Lee Williams seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’sopinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. 1 See United States v. Williams , Nos. CR-95- 1; CA-98-2091-4-22 (D.S.C. Jan. 19, 1999). 2 Williams’ motion for appointment of counsel is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# EUR-Lex - 12004V344 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V344

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART III — THE POLICIES AND FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - TITLE VI — THE FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - CHAPTER I — PROVISIONS GOVERNING THE INSTITUTIONS - Section 1 — The institutions - Subsection 3 — The Council of Ministers - Article III-344 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0154 - 0154 *

Article III-344

1. A committee consisting of the Permanent Representatives of the Governments of the Member States shall be responsible for preparing the work of the Council and for carrying out the tasks assigned to it by the latter. The Committee may adopt procedural decisions in cases provided for in the Council's Rules of Procedure.

2. The Council shall be assisted by a General Secretariat, under the responsibility of a Secretary-General appointed by the Council .

The Council shall decide on the organisation of the General Secretariat by a simple majority.

3. The Council shall act by a simple majority regarding procedural matters and for the adoption of its Rules of Procedure.

--------------------------------------------------
§ 86.12 What types of construction and services does boating infrastructure include? Boating infrastructure may include: ( a ) Boat slips, piers, mooring buoys, floating docks, dinghy docks, day docks, and other structures for boats to tie-up and gain access to the shore or services.
( b ) Fuel stations, restrooms, showers, utilities, and other amenities for transient-boater convenience.
( c ) Lighting, communications, buoys, beacons, signals, markers, signs, and other means to support safe boating and give information to aid boaters.
( d ) Breakwaters, sea walls, and other physical improvements to allow an area to offer a harbor of safe refuge. A *harbor of safe refuge* is an area that gives eligible vessels protection from storms. To be a harbor of safe refuge, the facility must offer a place to secure eligible vessels and offer access to provisions and communication for eligible users.
( e ) Equipment and structures for collecting, disposing of, or recycling liquid or solid waste from eligible vessels or for eligible users.