alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
i 

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

999 E Street. NW 

Washington, DC 20463 

STATEMENT OF DESIGNATION OF COUNSEL 

Please use one form for each ResDondent/Entitvn'reasurer 

FAX 1202^ 219-3923 

MUR# 6920 

, NAMEOfcouNSEuKorylanghofeL 

7 F,B„. Statecraft PLLC 0 A 649 N. Foufth Ave., Ste. B 

I Phoenix, AZ 85003 

TELEPHONE- OFFICE603 382-4078 

FAx,(__)____web Addres»kory@statecraftlaw.com 

The above-named individual and/or firm is hereby designated as my counsel and is 

authorized to receive any notifications and other communications from the Commission and to 

act on my behaif before the Commission. 

5/9/17 

Date /Ijlesp'Shdent/AgShf^STgnalure TltielTreasurer/Candidate/Owner) 

RESPONDENi\: /JsHTiss C. ThornSiS, If! 

pommittee Name, Company Name, or Individual Named in Notification Letter) 

MAILING /innppF«.7509 NW Tlffanv Springs Pkwy, Ste. 300 

(Please Print) 

Kansas City, MO 64152 

TELEPHONE- HOME ( 1 

BUSINESS ( ). 

Information is being sought as part of an investigation being conducted by the Fedorai Election Commission and 

the confidentiality provisions of 2 U.S.C, § 437g(a)(12}(A) apply. This section prohibits making public any 

investigation conducted by the Federal Election Commission without the express written' consent of the person 

under investigation ... 

Rev. 2010
#### § 1201.6 What is a claim or debt?

A claim or debt is an amount of money, funds, or property that has been determined by an agency official to be due the United States from any person, organization, or entity except another Federal agency (*see* § 1201.3).
1 

### Medina, Dayana

From: Medina, Dayana
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 9:02 AM

To: Pettyjohn, Mary
Cc: Donaldson, Guy; Feldman, Michael Subject: Region 6 comments on AEP Flint Creek

Hi Mary,

Here are Region 6’s comments regarding the most recent version of the AEP Flint Creek BART report and the updated

cost spreadsheets and other information provided by AEP/SWEPCO via email on 4/11/13. Please let me know if you’d

like to discuss.



### NOx It does not appear that any new information was provide d related to the cost estimate for the NOx control options. As we indicated in commen ts provided on 02/08/2013, very little documentation has been provided for the capital and operating costs for the LNB/OFA and SCR control options . In particular, for the LNB/OFA option, there is no breakdown provided for the estimated capital and installation co sts. A breakdown of these costs should be provided, along with a copy of any pertinent document s related to the “Public Service

Commission Docket 12-008-U” referenced under footnot e 1, and any other docum entation to support the

LNB/OFA cost estimate. We also not e that the LNB/OFA cost estimate assumes a 15 year equipment life. Unless proper documentation is provided to demonstrate that the anticipated equipm ent life of this control option is limited to 15 years, we believe that an anticipat ed 30 year equipment life w ould be more appropriate to use in the cost analysis. The cost estimate for the S CR option also provides no br eakdown of the capital costs and very little detail of the O&M cost s. Footnote 1 indicates that the SCR capital and O&M cost estimates were developed by AEP based on engineering estimates that were informed by AEP’ s experience with SCR

installation at other plants owned by AEP. Please provide documenta tion to support the SCR cost estimate. In addition, we note that the SCR cost estimate assumes a 20 year equipment life. Unless proper documentation is provided to demonstrate that the anticipated equipment lif e of SCR is limited to 20 ye ars, we believe that an anticipated 30 year equipment lif e would be more appropriate to use in the cost analysis.

In addition, as we noted in previous written comments , additional justification should be provided for the

selection of 0.23 lb/MMBtu as the NOx BART emission limit using LNB/OFA. The BART report states that this limit was selected based on experience with sim ilar boilers and vendor disc ussions. A vendor quote should be provided or a list of similarly configured boilers should be compiled along with emissions data from CAMD for these similar boilers in support of the 0.23 lb/MMBtu NOx BART emission limit fo r the Flint Creek unit.

Modeling Please provide a copy of the EPRI ca lculations used to estimate SO4 em issions for all m odeling scenarios.

Thank you,

Dayana Medina

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6

Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division

Air Planning Section (6PD

‐ L)

214

‐ 665

‐ 7241
# EUR-Lex - 11957E079 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11957E079

**TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY, PART TWO - FOUNDATIONS OF THE COMMUNITY, TITLE IV - TRANSPORT, ARTICLE 79 **

*

*

++++

ARTICLE 79

1 . IN THE CASE OF TRANSPORT WITHIN THE COMMUNITY , DISCRIMINATION WHICH TAKES THE FORM OF CARRIERS CHARGING DIFFERENT RATES AND IMPOSING DIFFERENT CONDITIONS FOR THE CARRIAGE OF THE SAME GOODS OVER THE SAME TRANSPORT LINKS ON GROUNDS OF THE COUNTRY OF ORIGIN OR OF DESTINATION OF THE GOODS IN QUESTION , SHALL BE ABOLISHED , AT THE LATEST , BEFORE THE END OF THE SECOND STAGE .

2 . PARAGRAPH 1 SHALL NOT PREVENT THE COUNCIL FROM ADOPTING OTHER MEASURES IN PURSUANCE OF ARTICLE 75 ( 1 ) .

3 . WITHIN TWO YEARS OF THE ENTRY INTO FORCE OF THIS TREATY , THE COUNCIL SHALL , ACTING BY A QUALIFIED MAJORITY ON A PROPOSAL FROM THE COMMISSION AND AFTER CONSULTING THE ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE , LAY DOWN RULES FOR IMPLEMENTING THE PROVISIONS OF PARAGRAPH 1 .

THE COUNCIL MAY IN PARTICULAR LAY DOWN THE PROVISIONS NEEDED TO ENABLE THE INSTITUTIONS OF THE COMMUNITY TO SECURE COMPLIANCE WITH THE RULE LAID DOWN IN PARAGRAPH 1 AND TO ENSURE THAT USERS BENEFIT FROM IT TO THE FULL .

4 . THE COMMISSION SHALL , ACTING ON ITS OWN INITIATIVE OR ON APPLICATION BY A MEMBER STATE , INVESTIGATE ANY CASES OF DISCRIMINATION FALLING WITHIN PARAGRAPH 1 AND , AFTER CONSULTING ANY MEMBER STATE CONCERNED , SHALL TAKE THE NECESSARY DECISIONS WITHIN THE FRAMEWORK OF THE RULES LAID DOWN IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF PARAGRAPH 3 .
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                         Subsidiaries of the Registrant

TRIKON TECHNOLOGIES, CO., LTD. (KOREA), a Korean corporation

TRIKON TECHNOLOGIES, JAPAN KK, a Japanese corporation

TRIKON TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED, an English corporation

TRIKON EQUIPMENTS LIMITED, an English corporation

TRIKON TECHNOLOGIES (ISRAEL) LIMITED, an English corporation

ELECTROTECH INTERNATIONAL LIMITED, an English corporation

E.T. FABRICATIONS LIMITED, an English corporation

E.T. ELECTROTECH RESEARCH LIMITED, an English corporation

E.T. EQUIPMENTS LIMITED, an English corporation

VACUUM CONTROL SYSTEMS LTD., an English corporation

TRIKON TECHNOLOGIES, GmbH, a German limited liability company

TRIKON TECHNOLOGIES, SARL, a French limited liability company

PMT U.S. HOLDINGS, INC., a California corporation

ENERGY TRANSFER SYSTEMS INC., a Delaware corporation

TRIKON HOLDINGS LTD., an English corporation

TRIKON TECHNOLOGIES B.V., a Dutch Limited Liability Company
Editorial Note on Part 622
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 622 appear at 79 FR 57837, Sept. 26, 2014 and at 81 FR 32253, May 23, 2016.

§ 622.250 Restrictions on sale/purchase. ( a ) A female golden crab in or from the South Atlantic EEZ may not be sold or purchased.
( b ) A golden crab harvested in the South Atlantic EEZ on board a vessel that does not have a valid commercial permit for golden crab, as required under § 622.240(a), may not be sold or purchased.
( c ) A golden crab harvested in or from the EEZ or adjoining state waters by a vessel that has a valid commercial vessel permit for South Atlantic golden crab may be sold or transferred only to a dealer who has a valid Gulf and South Atlantic dealer permit, as required under § 622.240(b)(1).
( d ) A golden crab harvested in or from the EEZ may be first received by a dealer who has a valid Gulf and South Atlantic dealer permit, as required under § 622.240(b)(1), only from a vessel that has a valid commercial vessel permit for golden crab.
[78 FR 22952, Apr. 17, 2013, as amended at 79 FR 19496, Apr. 9, 2014]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           10792
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     5000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 15792
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   16062
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              295
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          1368
<OTHER-SE>                                       14399
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     16062
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 84409
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (84409)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (84409)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (84409)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.04)


</TABLE>
#### § 13.1408 Dyea.

The Dyea Historic Townsite is closed to the use of horses by members of the public except by special use permit issued by the Superintendent under § 1.6 of this chapter. A map showing the boundaries of the Dyea Historic Townsite is available on the park Web site and at the park visitor center.

[80 FR 66419, Oct. 29, 2015]
#### § 665.902 Definitions.

The following definitions are used in this subpart:

*Management unit species or MUS* means the Mariana Archipelago management unit species as defined in §§ 665.401, 665.421, 665.441, and 665.461, and the pelagic management unit species as defined in § 665.800.

*Monument* means the submerged lands and, where applicable, waters of the Marianas Trench Marine National Monument as defined in § 665.901.

*Proclamation* means Presidential Proclamation 8335 of January 6, 2009, “Establishment of the Marianas Trench Marine National Monument.”
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED July 23, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-51401 Summary Calendar

ROYRY GLENN TONES, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, Respondent-Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 5:06-CV-683

-------------------- Before DeMOSS, STEWART, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * Royry Glenn Tones, Texas prisoner # 1237607, was convicted by a jury of two counts of aggravated robbery and was sentenced to 75 years in prison. He attempted to file a 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition challenging this conviction, but the district court dismissed his petition without prejudice pursuant to FED . R. C IV . P. 41(b) for failing to comply with a court order to pay the filing fee or request leave to proceed in forma pauperis. TonesNo. 06-51401 -2- now seeks a certificate of appealability (COA) to challenge this dismissal. Because a new petition filed by Tones would be barred by the limitations period of 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1), the district court’s dismissal without prejudice operates as a dismissal with prejudice. See Duncan v. Walker , 533 U.S. 167, 180 (2001); Gray v. Fidelity Acceptance Corp. , 634 F.2d 226, 227 (5th Cir. 1981). In his notice of appeal, and again before this court, Tones asserts that he submitted a timely request for withdrawal of his funds from his prison account and that this request was mailed in a timely manner. In light of this, there is no “clear record of delay or contumacious conduct” by Tones. See Gray , 634 F.2d at 227 (internal quotation marks omitted). Consequently, reasonable jurists would find it debatable that the district court erred in dismissing Tones’s petition on procedural grounds. See Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). COA is therefore GRANTED on the question whether Tones attempted to comply in a timely manner with the district court’s order for payment. This case is REMANDED for consideration of this issue in the first instance by the district court and for review of the prison records or an evidentiary hearing, if necessary. Tones’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal is likewise GRANTED.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Yankee Candle Company, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended July 3, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Craig W. Rydin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ CRAIG W. RYDIN
----------------------------
Craig W. Rydin
Chief Executive Officer
August 9, 2004
# EUR-Lex - 12006E200 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12006E200

**Treaty establishing the European Community (consolidated version) - Part Five - Institutions of the Community - TITLE I - Provisions governing the institutions - Chapter 1 - The institutions - Section 1 - The European Parliament - Article 200 **

*
Official Journal C 321 E , 29/12/2006 P. 0135 - 0135 Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0117 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0263 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0057 - Consolidated version (EEC Treaty - no official publication available) *

Article 200

The European Parliament shall discuss in open session the annual general report submitted to it by the Commission.

--------------------------------------------------
*This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court

generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order

and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

Filed 8/15/96

TENTH CIRCUIT

DAVID CHRISTOPHER WHITE,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

ADAMS COUNTY DETENTION

FACILITY, SHERIFF CAMP, W. T.

SHEARER, Sheriff; PENNY BROWN,

Former Jail Director; MELANIE

GREGORY, Technical Services

Manager; DONALD JARVIS, Captain;

SGT. DEBACA, DEPUTY ARGO,

SGT. HERSEY, SGT. TOTTEM, SGT.

BAILY, SGT. TWEDEN, J. J. LONG,

Sgt.,

Defendant-Appellees.

No. 95-1525

(D.C. No. 94-S-2478)

(Colorado)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before SEYMOUR, Chief Judge, KELLY and LUCERO, Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined
-2-

unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of

this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The cause is

therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

Mr. David C. White filed this pro se action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983,

alleging that the Adams County Detention Facility and several state officials

violated his Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights during his

incarceration. The district court dismissed Mr. White’s complaint pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 1915(d) and denied him leave to proceed in forma pauperis on this

appeal.

This matter is before the court on Mr. White’s motion for leave to proceed

on appeal without prepayment of costs or fees. In order to succeed on his motion,

Mr. White must show both: (1) a financial inability to pay the required filing fees

and (2) the existence of a nonfrivolous argument on the law and facts in support

of the issues raised on appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a); Coppedge v. United

States, 369 U.S. 438 (1962); DeBardeleben v. Quinlan, 937 F.2d 502 (10th Cir.

1991).

We agree with the district court that Mr. White can make no rational

argument on the law or facts in support of the issues raised on appeal. Therefore,

the motion for leave to proceed on appeal without prepayment of costs or fees is

denied substantially for the reasons given by the district court.
-3-

The decision of the district court is AFFIRMED. The mandate shall issue

forthwith.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT

Stephanie K. Seymour

Chief Judge
###### Editorial Note on [Part 1926](/current/title-29/part-1926?toc=1)

#### Editorial Notes:

1. At [44 FR 8577](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/44-FR-8577), Feb. 9, 1979, and corrected at [44 FR 20940](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/44-FR-20940), Apr. 6, 1979, OSHA reprinted without change the entire text of [29 CFR part 1926](/on/2024-09-23/title-29/part-1926) together with certain General Industry Occupational Safety and Health Standards contained in [29 CFR part 1910](/on/2024-09-23/title-29/part-1910), which have been identified as also applicable to construction work. This republication developed a single set of OSHA regulations for both labor and management forces within the construction industry.

2. Nomenclature changes to part 1926 appear at [84 FR 21597](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/84-FR-21597), May 14, 2019.

#### § 1926.1117 Vinyl chloride.

Note:

The requirements applicable to construction work under this section are identical to those set forth at [§ 1910.1017 of this chapter](/on/2024-09-23/title-29/section-1910.1017).

[[61 FR 31433](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/61-FR-31433), June 20, 1996]
§ 1012.11 Must I get approval before testifying as an expert witness other than on behalf of the United States in a Federal proceeding in which the United States is a party or has a direct and substantial interest? ( a ) You must comply with 5 CFR 2635.805(c), which details the authorization procedure for an employee to testify as an expert witness, not on behalf of the United States, in any proceeding before a court or agency of the United States in which the United States is a party or has a direct and substantial interest. This procedure means: ( 1 ) You must obtain the written approval of the Presidio Trust's General Counsel;
( 2 ) You must be in an approved leave status if you testify during duty hours; and
( 3 ) You must state for the record that you are appearing as a private individual and that your testimony does not represent the official views of the Presidio Trust.
( b ) If you testify as an expert witness on a matter outside the scope of your official duties, and which is not covered by paragraph (a) of this section, you must comply with 5 CFR 2635.802.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE AUDITED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF COMMUNITY BANCSHARES, INC. FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER
31, 1995 AND 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       1,763,882
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             2,450,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 11,302,580
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       5,414,836
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         5,399,611
<LOANS>                                     53,405,831
<ALLOWANCE>                                    619,133
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              74,715,368
<DEPOSITS>                                  64,455,177
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            924,292
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,853,158
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,482,741
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              74,715,368
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              4,268,735
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              879,994
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                78,617
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             5,227,346
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           2,782,812
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,801,323
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        2,426,023
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  287,500
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                (487)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              1,709,842
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                550,881
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     550,881
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   350,969
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .29
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.14
<LOANS-NON>                                     18,781
<LOANS-PAST>                                   235,930
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               418,620
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   96,663
<RECOVERIES>                                     9,676
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              619,133
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           599,600
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                         19,533


</TABLE>