alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EUR-Lex - 12006E280 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12006E280

**Treaty establishing the European Community (consolidated version) - Part Five - Institutions of the Community - TITLE II - Financial provisions - Article 280 **

*
Official Journal C 321 E , 29/12/2006 P. 0170 - 0170 Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0145 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0293 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0074 - Consolidated version *

Article 280

1. The Community and the Member States shall counter fraud and any other illegal activities affecting the financial interests of the Community through measures to be taken in accordance with this Article, which shall act as a deterrent and be such as to afford effective protection in the Member States.

2. Member States shall take the same measures to counter fraud affecting the financial interests of the Community as they take to counter fraud affecting their own financial interests.

3. Without prejudice to other provisions of this Treaty, the Member States shall coordinate their action aimed at protecting the financial interests of the Community against fraud. To this end they shall organise, together with the Commission, close and regular cooperation between the competent authorities.

4. The Council, acting in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 251, after consulting the Court of Auditors, shall adopt the necessary measures in the fields of the prevention of and fight against fraud affecting the financial interests of the Community with a view to affording effective and equivalent protection in the Member States. These measures shall not concern the application of national criminal law or the national administration of justice.

5. The Commission, in cooperation with Member States, shall each year submit to the European Parliament and to the Council a report on the measures taken for the implementation of this Article.

--------------------------------------------------
#### Henry H. Persons et al., as Receivers of the Bank of Commerce in Buffalo, Respondents, *v.*William H. Gardner et al., Appellants, and Robert R. Hefford et al., Respondents.

(Argued March 12, 1907;

decided April 2, 1907.)

*Persons*v. *Gardner,*113 App. Div. 597, affirmed.

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered June 11, 1906, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a decision of the court on trial at an Equity Term in an action against stockholders of a bank to recover a deficiency in its assets.

*Adalbert Moot*for appellants.

*Edward R. Bosley*for plaintiffs, respondents.

*George Wadsworth*for defendants, respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion of Williams, J., below.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Vann, Werner,Willard Bartlett, Hiscook and Chase, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       3,970,877
<SECURITIES>                                   120,037
<RECEIVABLES>                                  685,894
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,776,808
<PP&E>                                      13,892,502
<DEPRECIATION>                             (7,486,725)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,182,585
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          637,001
<BONDS>                                      2,363,628
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,181,956
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,182,585
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,941,228
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,528,251
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             222,725
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,190,252
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,190,252
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,190,252
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.1


 


Amendment
No. 3


to


Separation
Agreement


 


April
14, 2020


 


Reference
is hereby made to that certain Separation Agreement between Abeona Therapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”) and Steven
Rouhandeh (the “Executive”), dated January 2, 2020 (the “Separation Agreement”).


 


WHEREAS,
the Company and the Executive desire to amend the Separation Agreement,


 


NOW
THEREFORE, the parties hereby agree as follows:


 


	 	1.	Section
    1 is hereby amended by adding the following sentence to the end of Section 1:


 


“After
the Separation Date you shall be an inactive employee for a period of six (6) months, during which time you shall be available
for up to a maximum often (10) hours per month for consultation on transition matters.”


 


	ACCEPTED
    AND AGREED:	 
	 	 
	 	Abeona
    Therapeutics, Inc.
	 	 
	 	/s/
    Mark J. Alvino
	 	By:
    Mark J. Alvino
	 	Title:
    Chair Comp. Comm
	 	 
	 	/s/
    Steven H. Rouhandeh
	 	Steven
    H. Rouhandeh
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 188 (Thursday, September 28, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 56949]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-8327]


========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 188 / Thursday, September 28, 2006 / 
Notices

[[Page 56949]]



DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Glenn/Colusa County Resource Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Glenn/Colusa County Resource Advisory Committee (RAC) met 
in Willows, California. Agenda items covered include: (1) 
Introductions, (2) Approval of Minutes, (3) Public Comment, (4) Project 
Proposals/Possible Action, (5) General Discussion, (6) Plan Schedule 
for the Next Year, (7) Next Agenda.

DATES: The meeting was held on September 25, 2006, from 1:30 p.m. and 
ended at approximately 4:30 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting was held at the Mendocino National Forest 
Supervisor's Office, 825 N. Humboldt Ave., CA 95988. Individuals who 
wished to speak or propose agenda items sent their names and proposals 
to Janet Flanagan, Acting DFO, 825 N. Humboldt Ave., Willows, CA 95988.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bobbin Gaddini, Committee Coordinator, 
USDA, Mendocino National Forest, Grindstone Ranger District, 825 N. 
Humboldt Ave., Willows, CA 95939. (530) 934-1268; E-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5b3c3c3a3f3f3235321b3d28753d3e3f752e28"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9dfafafcf9f9f4f3f4ddfbeeb3fbf8f9b3e8ee">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting was open to the public. 
Committee discussion was limited to Forest Service staff and Committee 
members. However, persons who wished to bring matters to the attention 
of the Committee filed written statements with the Committee staff 
before or after the meeting. Public input sessions were provided and 
individuals who made written requests by September 23, 2006 had the 
opportunity to address the committee at those sessions.

    Dated: September 21, 2006.
Janet Flanagan,
Acting Designated Federal Official.
[FR Doc. 06-8327 Filed 9-27-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. CLIFFORD MACKRELL , Defendant Criminal Action No. 2 1

- 276

- 1 (CKK)

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ( April 3, 2023) Before the Court is Defendant’s [53] Motion for Transfer of Venue . Like myriad other defendants in January 6th cases, Defendant requests that the Court transfer this case to another district court, arguing that no impartial petit jury can be seated in thi s jurisdiction. Every single court of this jurisdiction has rejected at least one such request , 1 including this Court

. 2 In its prior opinions, t his Court has already rejected the vast majority of Defendant’s arguments, and shall simply incorporate by r eference its prior reasoning herein. See United States v. Eicher , Crim. A.
No. 22

- 038 (CKK) , 2022 WL 11737926 (Oct. 20, 2022) ; United States v. Chwiesiuk , Crim. A. No.
21

- 536 (CKK) , 2023 WL 2562517 (Mar. 17, 2023). The only issue this Court has yet to ad dress is the effect of certain polls of District of Columbia residents regarding their feelings on individuals charged with criminal offenses arising from the insurrection of January 6th. ECF Nos. 53

- 1, 53

- 2.

1 E.g. , United States v. Nassif , Crim. A. No. 21

- 421 (JDB), 2022 WL 4130841 (D.D.C. Sept. 12, 2022); United States v. Brock , --- F. Supp. 3d

--- , 2022 WL 3910549, at *5

- 6 (D.D.C. Aug. 31, 2022) (JDB) United States v. Garcia , Crim. A. No. 21

- 0129 (ABJ), 2022 WL 2904352, at *15 (D.D.C. Ju ly 22, 2022); United States v. Bochene , 579 F. Supp. 3d 177, 181

- 82 (D.D.C. 2022). 2 E.g. , United States v. Eicher , Crim. A. No. 22

- 038, 2022 WL 11737926 (Oct. 20, 2022) ; United States v. Chwiesiuk , Crim. A. No. 21

- 536, 2023 WL 2562517 (Mar. 17, 2023).2 These surveys are not new, and every court to address them has concluded that voir dire is necessary before transferring a case due to alleged prejudice in a jury pool. E.g. , United States v. Rhodes , 610 F. Supp. 3d 29, 56

- 57 (D.D.C. 2022) (APM) ; United S tates v. Brock , --- F. Supp. 3d

--- , 2022 WL 3910549, at *7 (D.D.C. Aug. 31, 2022) (JDB); United States v. Rhine , Crim. A. No.
21

- 687 (RC), 2023 WL 372044, at *4 (D.D.C. Jan. 24, 2023). For the reasons stated in those decisions, the Court concludes the su rveys cited again in this case do not warrant transfer

. As this Court has previously explained , relying wholesale on polling of uncertain methodological efficacy regarding January 6th as a whole is not an appropriate substitute for voir dire

. See United States v. Haldeman , 559 F.2d 31, 64 n.43 (D.C. Cir. 1976). The Court will address the exact scope of voir dire at a later time. Accordingly, and for the foregoing reasons, it is hereby
ORDERED , that Defendant’s [53] Motion for Transfer of Venue is DENIED

. SO ORDERED

.
Dated: April 3, 2023 /s/ COLLEEN KOLLAR

- KOTELLY United States District Judge
EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of WNC California Housing
Tax Credits II, L.P.  (the  "Partnership")  for the year ended March 31, 2003 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  and  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.,  section  1350,  as adopted  pursuant to
section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  I,  Wilfred N.  Cooper,  Sr.,
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates,  Inc., general partner
of the Partnership, hereby certify that:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Partnership.

/s/WILFRED N. COOPER, JR.
-------------------------
Wilfred N. Cooper, Jr.
President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.
Exhibit 10.24
                               FIRST AMENDMENT TO
                            MAVERICK TUBE CORPORATION
                             1994 STOCK OPTION PLAN


         THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE MAVERICK TUBE  CORPORATION  1994 STOCK 
OPTION PLAN ("First  Amendment") is adopted as of this 22nd Day of July.

         WHEREAS,  Maverick Tube Corporation,  a Delaware  corporation  
("Maverick") has established the Maverick Tube Corporation 1994 Stock Option 
Plan (the "Plan") dated November 16, 1994;

         WHEREAS,  Section IX of the Plan provides, among other things, that the
Board of Directors  of Maverick  (the  "Board")  may amend the Plan,  subject to
certain conditions; and

         WHEREAS,  the Board  believes  that it would be in the best interest of
Maverick to amend the Plan as provided herein.

         NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:

         1.       The first sentence of Section V of the Plan is hereby  deleted
in its entirety and the following  substituted in lieu thereof:

                           "Subject  to the  adjustment  as  provided in Article
                  VII,  the  aggregate  number  of  shares  which  may be issued
                  pursuant  to the  exercise of Options  granted  under the Plan
                  shall not exceed 1,000,000."

         2. All  references in the Plan to "the Plan" shall be deemed to include
this First Amendment from and after the date the First Amendment is adopted.

         IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  this First  Amendment  has been duly  executed by
authority of the Board as of the day and year first above written.

                                                     MAVERICK TUBE CORPORATION

                                                     /s/ Gregg  M. Eisenberg

                                                     By:
                                                     Title:  President and Chief
                                                     Executive Officer
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Delta Regional Authority","provider_url":"https:\/\/dra.gov","author_name":"AhaZapier","author_url":"https:\/\/dra.gov\/author\/ahazapier\/","title":"Biden-Harris Administration Announces Over $1.2 Million Investment into Southern Illinois - Delta Regional Authority","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"k3jyMyjCDr\"><a href=\"https:\/\/dra.gov\/biden-harris-administration-announces-over-1-2-million-investment-into-southern-illinois\/\">Biden-Harris Administration Announces Over $1.2 Million Investment into Southern Illinois<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/dra.gov\/biden-harris-administration-announces-over-1-2-million-investment-into-southern-illinois\/embed\/#?secret=k3jyMyjCDr\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Biden-Harris Administration Announces Over $1.2 Million Investment into Southern Illinois” — Delta Regional Authority\" data-secret=\"k3jyMyjCDr\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"Biden-Harris Administration Announces Over $1.2 Million Investment into Southern Illinois Communities","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/mcusercontent.com\/90665e275659657eb2097e76c\/images\/3c279e98-4eee-68aa-d6e2-455119b8e0a5.png"}
Exhibit 32
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Annual Report of Innovative Software Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert V. Rudman, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:
 
 (1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 
 /s/ Robert V. RudmanRobert V. Rudman
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
August 19, 2009
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5265

To amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to increase the

number of college students who register and vote.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 7, 1994

Mr. GUTIERREZ introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on House Administration

A BILL

To amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to

increase the number of college students who register

and vote.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. INCREASED STUDENT ACCESS TO VOTER REG4 ISTRATION.

5 Paragraph (2) of subsection (a) of section 7 of the

6 National Voter Registration Act of 1993 (42 U.S.C.

7 1973gg–5(a)(2)) is amended—

8 (1) by striking out ‘‘and’’ after the semicolon at

9 the end of subparagraph (A);
2

•HR 5265 IH

1 (2) by striking out the period at the end of sub2 paragraph (B) and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘; and’’;

3 and

4 (3) by adding at the end the following new sub5 paragraph:

6 ‘‘(C) all State-funded institutions of higher edu7 cation, through class registration or student fee pay8 ment, or both.’’.

9 SEC. 2. POLLING PLACES ON COLLEGE CAMPUSES.

10 The National Voter Registration Act of 1993 (42

11 U.S.C. 1973gg et seq.) is amended by adding at the end

12 the following new section:

13 ‘‘SEC. 14. POLLING PLACES ON COLLEGE CAMPUSES.

14 ‘‘The chief election officer of each State shall, with

15 respect to elections for Federal office, provide for a polling

16 place at a central location on each campus of a State-fund17 ed institution of higher education. At each such polling

18 place, either absentee ballots or regular ballots shall be

19 made available to voters who reside in the same county

20 as the polling place.’’.

Æ
Case 16-81874 Doc 4 Filed 08/08/16 Entered 08/08/16 12:09:31 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO                     
|----------------------------------------------
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

I, Sean R. Dickenson , hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Eden Energy Corp.
      for the period ended March 31, 2011 (the "Report") fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934; and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Eden Energy Corp.                                                                 

Dated: May 15, 2011

| | /s/
      Sean R. Dickenson                                         
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------
| | Sean R. Dickenson                                                   
| | Chief Financial Officer                                             
| | (Principal Financial Officer and Principal
      Accounting Officer)
| | Eden Energy Corp.                                                   

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Eden Energy
Corp. and will be retained by Eden Energy Corp. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---