alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 19 (Monday, January 30, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 4923]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-846]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Cancer Institute Special Emphasis 
Panel, SBIR Topic 208 (Phase I) ``Targetry Systems for Production of 
Research Radionucleides''.
    Date: February 23, 2006.
    Time: 12 p.m. to 4 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6116 Executive Boulevard, 
Rockville, MD 20852, (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: C. Michael Kerwin, PhD, MPH, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Special Review and Logistics Branch, Division of 
Extramural Activities, National Cancer Institute, National 
Institutes of Health, 6116 Executive Boulevard, Room 8057, MSC 8329, 
Bethesda, MD 20892-8329, 301-496-7421, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d2b9b7a0a5bbbcbf92bfb3bbbefcbcbbbafcb5bda4"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3f545a4d485651527f525e56531151565711585049">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, 
Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 
93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer 
Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer 
Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer 
Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 23, 2006.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 06-846 Filed 1-27-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk August 6, 2009

p0720 

# Order

August 6, 2009

138814

JEAN BAUMGARD, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 138814 COA: 281589 Genesee CC: 06-083472-NI FARMERS INSURANCE EXCHANGE, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 24, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the  Annual  Report of  Colonial  Trust  Company  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-KSB for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Ian B.
Currie,  Controller/Treasurer  of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

_/s/ Ian B. Currie__

Ian B. Currie
Controller/Treasurer
July 14, 2004

     This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
subject  to the  knowledge  standard  contained  therein,  and not for any other
purpose.
#### § 1220.3 What standards are used as guidelines for Subchapter B?

These regulations are in conformance with ISO 15489-1:2001, Information and documentation—Records management. Other standards relating to specific sections of the regulations are cited where appropriate.
#### § 1201.11 Will NARA refer claims to the Department of Justice?

NARA will refer to DOJ for litigation claims on which aggressive collection actions have been taken, but which could not be collected, compromised, suspended, or terminated. Referrals will be made as early as possible, consistent with aggressive NARA collection action, and within the period for bringing a timely suit against the debtor.
#### § 1226.1 What are the general authorities for this part?

The statutory authorities are 44 U.S.C. 2107, 2111, 2904, 3102, 3301 and 3302.
# EUR-Lex - 12004V374 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V374

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART III — THE POLICIES AND FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - TITLE VI — THE FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - CHAPTER I — PROVISIONS GOVERNING THE INSTITUTIONS - Section 1 — The institutions - Subsection 5 — The Court of Justice of the European Union - Article III-374 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0162 - 0162 *

Article III-374

The Court of Justice of the European Union shall have jurisdiction to give judgment pursuant to any arbitration clause contained in a contract concluded by or on behalf of the Union, whether that contract be governed by public or private law.

--------------------------------------------------
Editorial Note on Part 660
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 660 appear at 67 FR 65906, Oct. 29, 2002, 88 FR 81358, Nov. 22, 2023.

§ 660.232 Limited entry daily trip limit (DTL) fishery for sablefish. ( a ) *Limited entry DTL fisheries both north and south of 36° N. lat.* ( 1 ) Before the start of the sablefish primary season, all sablefish landings made by a vessel declared into the limited entry fixed gear fishery and authorized by § 660.231(a) to fish in the sablefish primary season will be subject to the restrictions and limits of the limited entry DTL fishery for sablefish specified in this section and which is governed by routine management measures imposed under § 660.60(c), subpart C.
( 2 ) Following the start of the primary season, all sablefish landings made by a vessel declared into the limited entry fixed gear fishery and authorized by § 660.231(a) to fish in the primary season will count against the primary season cumulative limit(s) associated with the sablefish-endorsed permit(s) registered for use with that vessel. A vessel that is eligible to fish in the sablefish primary season may fish in the DTL fishery for sablefish once that vessels' primary season sablefish limit(s) have been landed, or after the close of the primary season, whichever occurs earlier (as described at § 660.231(b)(1). If the vessel continues to fish in the limited entry fixed gear fishery for any part of the remaining fishing year, any subsequent sablefish landings by that vessel will be subject to the restrictions and limits of the limited entry DTL fishery for sablefish.
( 3 ) Vessels registered for use with a limited entry fixed gear permit that does not have a sablefish endorsement may fish in the limited entry DTL fishery, consistent with regulations at § 660.230, for as long as that fishery is open during the fishing year, subject to routine management measures imposed under § 660.60(c), Subpart C. DTL limits for the limited entry fishery north and south of 36° N. lat. are provided in Tables 2 (North) and 2 (South) of this subpart.
( b ) A vessel that is jointly registered, and has participated or will participate in both the limited entry fixed gear fishery and the Shorebased IFQ Program during the fishing year, is subject to crossover provisions described at § 660.60(h)(7), subpart C.
[81 FR 84432, Nov. 23, 2016]
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 54 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 54

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the limitation 
             on the credit for biomass stoves and boilers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             January 24 (legislative day, January 3), 2023

 Mr. King (for himself, Ms. Collins, Mrs. Shaheen, Ms. Hassan, and Ms. 
  Murkowski) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the limitation 
             on the credit for biomass stoves and boilers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INCREASED LIMITATION FOR BIOMASS STOVES AND BOILERS UNDER 
              ENERGY EFFICIENT HOME IMPROVEMENT CREDIT.

    (a) In General.--Section 25C(b)(5) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended--
            (1) by striking ``shall not, in the aggregate, exceed'' and 
        all that follows and inserting the following: ``shall not 
        exceed--
                    ``(A) with respect to amounts paid or incurred, in 
                the aggregate, for property described in clauses (i) 
                and (ii) of subsection (d)(2)(A), $2,000, and
                    ``(B) with respect to amounts paid or incurred, in 
                the aggregate, for property described in subsection 
                (d)(2)(B), $8,000.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to property placed in service after December 31, 2022.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 91.17 Property insurance for contest entries.

Each contestant is responsible for obtaining adequate insurance coverage for his/her entry. Neither the Service nor the Department of the Interior will insure the entries, nor is the Service or Department responsible for loss or damage unless such is caused by Service or Department negligence or willful misconduct. The Service and Department reserve the right to determine whether negligence or willful misconduct led to artwork being damaged. Entry fees for the subsequent year's contest may be waived for artists whose artwork we determine to be damaged by any negligence on our part. This waiver remains at our discretion.

[71 FR 39015, July 11, 2006]
Opinion issued November 16, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-20-00743-CV

———————————

JUAN SIERRA, NICHOLAS SIERRA, AND SOAMY BAUTISTA, 

Appellants

V.

GULF COAST CONCRETE AND SHELL, INC., Appellee

On Appeal from the 412th Judicial District Court

Brazoria County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 107072-CV

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellants have failed to timely file a brief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a) 

(governing time to file brief), 38.8(a) (governing failure of appellant to file brief). 

After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellants did not 

respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case). 
2

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution for failure to timely file 

a brief. We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Goodman, Rivas-Molloy, and Farris.
# EUR-Lex - 12004V390 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V390

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART III — THE POLICIES AND FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - TITLE VI — THE FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - CHAPTER I — PROVISIONS GOVERNING THE INSTITUTIONS - Section 2 — The Union's advisory bodies - Subsection 2 — The Economic and Social Committee - Article III-390 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0168 - 0168 *

Article III-390

The members of the Economic and Social Committee shall be appointed for five years. Their term of office shall be renewable.

The Council shall adopt the European decision establishing the list of members drawn up in accordance with the proposals made by each Member State.

The Council shall act after consulting the Commission. It may obtain the opinion of European bodies which are representative of the various economic and social sectors and of civil society to which the Union's activities are of concern.

--------------------------------------------------
§ 37.14 Bonding. ( a ) Before the issuance of its special use permit, any applicant whose exploration plan has been approved under § 37.22 shall furnish to the Service a surety bond of not less than $100,000, or other security satisfactory to the Service, to secure performance of its exploration plan and plan(s) of operation and compliance with the permit and this part. Such surety bond shall be issued by qualified surety companies approved by the Department of the Treasury (see Department of the Treasury Circular No. 570). Such bond shall be maintained by the permittee for the benefit of the Service until the Regional Director notifies the permittee in writing that all terms and conditions of its exploration plan, special use permit, plan of operation, and this part have been met or otherwise consents to its cancellation or termination. Any bond furnished or maintained by a person under this section shall be on a form approved or prescribed by the Regional Director. The Regional Director may require an increase in the amount of any bond or other security to be furnished and any outstanding bond or security or require a new bond or security whenever additional coverage is needed to secure performance of its exploration plan and plan(s) of operation and compliance with the permit and this part or is needed as a consequence of default.
( b ) Whenever a permittee's exploration plan, plan of operation, or special use permit is revised or modified, the permittee shall provide to the Regional Director within 30 days thereafter an acknowledgement by the surety that its bond continues to apply to the exploration plan, plan of operation or special use permit, as revised or modified, unless a waiver of notice to the surety is contained in the bond or the surety is not otherwise released by the revision or modification, or unless the permittee provides to the Service an increased or additional bond.
( c ) Recovery of the amount specified in the permittee's bond or other security shall not preclude the Department from seeking specific performance by the permittee of any obligations not satisfied by enforcement of the bond or security, or compensation for any damages, losses or costs due to the permittee's activities which exceed the amount recovered, by pursuing the Department's legal remedies.
[Civ. No. 2126.

Second Appellate District.

February 23, 1918.]

#### BOAZ DUNCAN, Respondent, v. TOM POSTE, INC. (a Corporation), et al., as Trustees, etc., Appellants.

Assignment—Claim fob Bent—Sufficiency of Evidence.—In an action on an assigned claim for rent due under a lease, the assignment of the claim to the plaintiff by the assignors, who were partners, is sufficiently proven by the testimony of one of the partners that before the commencement of the action he assigned in writing on the back of the lease all of the claims of himself and his partner to all of the rent due from the defendant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Grant Jackson, Judge.

*371The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

Fred W. Heatherly, for Appellants.

Valentine *&*Newby, for Respondent.

THE COURT.

The defendants were indebted to the plaintiff’s assignors for delinquent rent due upon a lease of real property. The complaint alleged an assignment of said claim to the plaintiff and this allegation was not denied by the answer; nevertheless the plaintiff at the trial introduced evidence of such assignment.

The only point urged in support of the appeal is under a specification of insufficiency of the evidence to support a finding in favor of the plaintiff based upon this evidence. Appellant insists that as the plaintiff at the trial assumed that evidence of the assignment was necessary, the defendants thereby became entitled to have the case tried as if the assignment had been denied. Assuming for the purposes of the argument that" the question was at issue, we nevertheless find in the record ample evidence to support the finding. It is true that the plaintiff, who had lost the written assignment, testified that the words thereof were: “For value, I hereby assign to Boaz Duncan all my right, title and interest to the within lease.” Plaintiff’s assignors were partners and the assignment was made by one of the partners, L. M. Holman, who testified that before the commencement of this action he assigned in writing on the back of the lease all of the claims of himself and his partner to all of the rent due from the defendant corporation. The defendants other than the corporation were its directors and have become its trustees after the forfeiture of its charter.

It appearing to the court that the appeal is without merit and was made for delay, the judgment is affirmed, and there is added the sum of $50 damages, together with the costs.
#### § 1256.40 What are general restrictions?

General restrictions apply to certain kinds of information or classes of records, regardless of the record group to which the records have been allocated. These general restrictions may apply to records and materials not covered by the Freedom of Information Act. The general restrictions are listed and explained in §§ 1256.46 through 1256.62.
§ 1275.50 Restriction of materials of general historical significance unrelated to abuses of governmental power. ( a ) The Archivist will restrict access to materials determined during the processing period to be of general historical significance, but not related to abuses of governmental power, under one or more of the circumstances specified in § 1275.48(a).
( b ) The Archivist will also restrict access to materials of general historical significance, but not related to abuses of governmental power, when the release of these materials would: ( 1 ) Disclose trade secrets and commercial or financial information obtained from a person and privileged or confidential; or
( 2 ) Constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy of a living person; or
( 3 ) Disclose investigatory materials compiled for law enforcement purposes, but only when the disclosure of such records would: ( i ) Interfere with enforcement proceedings;
( ii ) Deprive a person of a right to a fair trial or an impartial adjudication;
( iii ) Constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy;
( iv ) Disclose the identity of a confidential source who furnished information on a confidential basis, and in the case of a record compiled by a criminal law enforcement authority in the course of a criminal investigation or by an agency conducting a lawful national security intelligence investigation, confidential information furnished by a confidential source;
( v ) Disclose techniques and procedures for law enforcement investigations or prosecutions, or disclose guidelines for law enforcement investigations or prosecutions if such disclosure could reasonably be expected to risk circumvention of the law; or
( vi ) Endanger the life or physical safety of any individual.
# EUR-Lex - 12006E113 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12006E113

**Treaty establishing the European Community (consolidated version) - Part Three - Community policies - TITLE VII - Economic and monetary policy - Chapter 3 - Institutional provisions - Article 113 **

*
Official Journal C 321 E , 29/12/2006 P. 0091 - 0091 Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0079 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0224 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0038 - Consolidated version *

Article 113

1. The President of the Council and a member of the Commission may participate, without having the right to vote, in meetings of the Governing Council of the ECB.

The President of the Council may submit a motion for deliberation to the Governing Council of the ECB.

2. The President of the ECB shall be invited to participate in Council meetings when the Council is discussing matters relating to the objectives and tasks of the ESCB.

3. The ECB shall address an annual report on the activities of the ESCB and on the monetary policy of both the previous and current year to the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission, and also to the European Council. The President of the ECB shall present this report to the Council and to the European Parliament, which may hold a general debate on that basis.

The President of the ECB and the other members of the Executive Board may, at the request of the European Parliament or on their own initiative, be heard by the competent committees of the European Parliament.

--------------------------------------------------
#### THE PHŒNIX BANK, Appellant, v. DANIEL P. STAFFORD and MARTHA T. STAFFORD, Respondents.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered before another referee, costs to abide event.

Opinion by

Haedin, J.
**REGULATORY EVALUATION**

**Directorate Identifier:** 2011

- NM

- 156

- AD

**Executive Order 12866:** Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. I s it appropriate t o include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES ( ) explain NO (X)