alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-7105

MARVIN DOMINIC GREEN, Petitioner - Appellant, versus STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH CAROLINA; CHARLES CONDON, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. Matthew J. Perry, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-01-4212-8-10BC) Submitted: September 30, 2003 Decided: October 8, 2003 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Marvin Dominic Green, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Marvin Dominic Green, a state prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a § 2254 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, , 123 S. Ct. 1029, 1040 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.), cert. denied , 534 U.S. 941 (2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Green has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Army

# AGENCY:

Department of the Army, DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice of open meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.1), announcement is made of the following committee meeting.

*Name of Committee:*                         U.S. Army War College Subcommittee of the Army Education Advisory Committee.                    

*Dates of Meeting:*                         October 26, 2006 and October 27, 2006.                    

*Place of Meeting:*                         U.S. Army War College, 122 Forbes Avenue, Carlisle, PA, Command Conference Room, Root Hall, Carlisle Barracks, Pennsylvania 17013.                    

*Time of Meeting:*                         8:30 a.m.-5 p.m.                    

*Proposed Agenda:*                         Receive information briefings; conduct discussions with the Commandant and staff and facility; table and examine online College issues; assess resident and distance education programs, self-study techniques, assemble a working group for the concentrated review of institutional policies and a working group to address committee membership and charter issues; propose strategies and recommendations that will continue the momentum of federal accreditation success and guarantee compliance with regional accreditation standards.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        To request advance approval or obtain further information, contact Colonel Henry M. St-Pierre, Director of Joint                               ( print page 58591)                            Education, Department of Academic Affairs, U.S. Army War College, 122 Forbes Avenue, ATTN: DAA, Carlisle, PA 17013 or telephone (717) 245-3907.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

This meeting is open to the public. Any interested person may attend, appear before, make a presentation, or file statements with the Committee after receiving advance approval for participation.

Brenda S. Bowen,

Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 06-8475 Filed 10-3-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
## State of N ew York Su p reme Cou rt, A p p ellate Division Third J u dicial Dep artment Decided and Entered: November 20, 2014 515841

________________________________ CAROL B. RONOVECH, Appellant, v MEMORANDUM AND ORDER CITY OF ONEONTA, Respondent.

________________________________ Calendar Date: October 7, 2014 Before: Lahtinen, J.P., Stein, McCarthy, Rose and Clark, JJ.

__________ Catherine E. Stuckart, Binghamton, for appellant. The Mills Law Firm, Clifton Park (Christopher K. Mills of counsel), for respondent.

__________ Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Coccoma, J.), entered September 19, 2012 in Otsego County, which granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Order affirmed, upon the opinion of Justice Michael V. Coccoma. Lahtinen, J.P., Stein, McCarthy, Rose and Clark, JJ., concur.-2- 515841

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger Clerk of the Court
Exhibit 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Darryl L. Canfield, Chief Financial Officer of Biophan Technologies, Inc.
(the "Company"), certify to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of
this Amendment #1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended May
31, 2006 of the Company, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report, fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                        Date: January 24, 2007

                                        /s/ Darryl L. Canfield
                                        ------------------------
                                        Darryl L. Canfield
                                        Chief Financial Officer
# EUR-Lex - 12006E087 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12006E087

**Treaty establishing the European Community (consolidated version) - Part Three - Community policies - TITLE VI - Common rules on competition, taxation and approximation of laws - Chapter 1 - Rules on competition - Section 2 - Aids granted by States - Article 87 **

*
Official Journal C 321 E , 29/12/2006 P. 0076 - 0077 Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0067 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0211 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0030 - Consolidated version (EEC Treaty - no official publication available) *

Article 87

1. Save as otherwise provided in this Treaty, any aid granted by a Member State or through State resources in any form whatsoever which distorts or threatens to distort competition by favouring certain undertakings or the production of certain goods shall, in so far as it affects trade between Member States, be incompatible with the common market.

2. The following shall be compatible with the common market:

(a) aid having a social character, granted to individual consumers, provided that such aid is granted without discrimination related to the origin of the products concerned;

(b) aid to make good the damage caused by natural disasters or exceptional occurrences;

(c) aid granted to the economy of certain areas of the Federal Republic of Germany affected by the division of Germany, in so far as such aid is required in order to compensate for the economic disadvantages caused by that division.

3. The following may be considered to be compatible with the common market:

(a) aid to promote the economic development of areas where the standard of living is abnormally low or where there is serious underemployment;

(b) aid to promote the execution of an important project of common European interest or to remedy a serious disturbance in the economy of a Member State;

(c) aid to facilitate the development of certain economic activities or of certain economic areas, where such aid does not adversely affect trading conditions to an extent contrary to the common interest;

(d) aid to promote culture and heritage conservation where such aid does not affect trading conditions and competition in the Community to an extent that is contrary to the common interest;

(e) such other categories of aid as may be specified by decision of the Council acting by a qualified majority on a proposal from the Commission.

--------------------------------------------------
SIR 2004-5241: Change History

Originally posted on the Web in October 2005: Minor changes to text and figures were implemented version 1.0Web version 1.0 posted in March 2006.Web version 1.1 posted in June 2006: Minor changes made to color key and captions of figures 36, 3Web version 1.2 posted in November 2006: Minor changes made to figure 4 and page 72.

SIR 2004-5241: Change and Version History htt

1 of 1
Successful Practices & Strategies Vol. 2 | No. 5

Key West Police Department 

Key West, Florida 

http://www.keywestcity.com

Community policing element 

Community partnerships 

Problem/issue 

Expanding community/school involvement 

Problem description 

We are very pleased to have reactivated our Police Explorer program in the high school. We believe that 

having the students involved in the program will present a positive image with the police and will affect 

other students, parents, teachers, and administrators to become more involved in this community 

policing effort. 

Community policing strategies implemented 

It is essential that the police and our schools have a very close, trusting, and interactive relationship with 

each other. By re-establishing the Police Explorer program, the police department, through our school 

resource officers, has laid the foundation for enhancing this relationship. In addition, we are confident 

that the program will, as a recruitment tool, produce high quality police officer candidates with good 

values and character who have demonstrated their desire to learn about law enforcement and have 

started a career path toward achieving that goal if they desire. 

Change and/or impact as a result of these community policing efforts 

While the program is in its beginning stages, we expect to achieve the goals of the program, which are 

to help our young adults choose a career path within law enforcement in their hometown and to 

challenge them to become responsible citizens of their community. The benefits of an explorer program 

include improved self-confidence, development of leadership skills, fun and exciting “hands-on” career 

experiences, team building, and community service opportunities. 
2 

By participating in community service projects, we expect our explorers to learn the value and 

importance of other people and to develop empathy for people who are in need or less fortunate than 

themselves. 

The opinions contained herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the 

U.S. Department of Justice. References to specific agencies, companies, products, or services should not be considered an 

endorsement by the author(s) or the U.S. Department of Justice. Rather, the references are illustrations to supplement 

discussion of the issues. 

The Internet references cited in this document were valid as of the date of publication. Given that URLs and websites are in 

constant flux, neither the author(s) nor the Office of Community Oriented Policing Services can vouch for their current validity. 

Published 2015
#### Joseph Deppe, appellee, v. Colfax County, appellant.

Filed December 4, 1913.

No. 17,632.

Appeal from the district court for Colfax county; George H. Thomas, Judge.

*Affirmed.*

W. *I. Allen*and *B. F. Farwell,*for appellant.

*A. Fj. (Hurten*and *George*W. *Wertz, contra.*

Letton, J.

This is an action for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff in the same accident involved in the case of *Peitzmieier v. Colfax County, ante,*p. 675. The two cases were argued and submitted together, the same alleged errors being relied upon. The decision in that case conirols this. The judgment of the district court is

Affirmed.

Barnes, Rose and Sedgwick, JJ., not sitting.
Successful Practices & Strategies Vol. 2 | No. 7

City of McFarland 

McFarland, California 

http://www.mcfarlandcity.org

Community policing element 

Community partnerships 

Problem/issue 

Building trust with the community 

Problem description 

We have a small police department with limited resources. We need to build trust with the community, 

using their eyes and ears to help us protect and serve them but protecting those who report crimes 

from harm. Ensuring the community’s safety builds the trust needed by the public to be partners in 

community policing. The community members see many things occurring; however, they are reluctant 

to call the police department or report the matters because they fear retaliation. They do not want to

give their name or address because they fear the criminals might find out they called or talked to the 

police. 

Community policing strategies implemented 

Our anonymous tip line has allowed us to reach out to the portion of the community that wants to stay 

anonymous due to a fear of retaliation. These citizens want to be able to take an active role in reporting 

gang and drug activity, but they wish to remain anonymous. This information is funneled to an officer 

who is able to follow up on the information in a timely manner. The anonymous tip line has assisted us 

with combating gang activity and drug activity within the city. 

Change and/or impact as a result of these community policing efforts 

The community is calling the anonymous tip line and reporting numerous matters, including violent 

crimes and gang-related drug dealing. We have been able to solve problems and crimes within the 

community as a result of the information the public is sharing with us through the anonymous tip line. 
2 

Lessons learned through program implementation 

The public is a very valuable resource to us. Even though we have a small police department with limited 

resources, the public has thousands of sets of eyes and ears. They see and hear many things. If we can 

reassure them their identities can remain anonymous and they and their families won’t be harmed, they 

are willing to share what they are seeing and hearing within the community to help us do our jobs 

better. We are able to build a stronger partnership with the community. Community policing is a very 

important component of successful policing in today’s society.

The opinions contained herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the 

U.S. Department of Justice. References to specific agencies, companies, products, or services should not be considered an 

endorsement by the author(s) or the U.S. Department of Justice. Rather, the references are illustrations to supplement 

discussion of the issues. 

The Internet references cited in this document were valid as of the date of publication. Given that URLs and websites are in 

constant flux, neither the author(s) nor the Office of Community Oriented Policing Services can vouch for their current validity. 

Published 2015
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) OR RULE 15d-14(a)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Craig W. Rydin, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of The Yankee Candle
Company, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b) [Not applicable]c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and 5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls
over financial reporting. Date: October 29, 2004
    
    /s/ Craig W. RydinCraig W. RydinChief Executive Officer(principal executive officer)
# EUR-Lex - 12004V359 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V359

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART III — THE POLICIES AND FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - TITLE VI — THE FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - CHAPTER I — PROVISIONS GOVERNING THE INSTITUTIONS - Section 1 — The institutions - Subsection 5 — The Court of Justice of the European Union - Article III-359 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0158 - 0158 *

Article III-359

1. European laws may establish specialised courts attached to the General Court to hear and determine at first instance certain classes of action or proceeding brought in specific areas. They shall be adopted either on a proposal from the Commission after consultation of the Court of Justice or at the request of the Court of Justice after consultation of the Commission.

2. The European law establishing a specialised court shall lay down the rules on the organisation of the court and the extent of the jurisdiction conferred upon it.

3. Decisions given by specialised courts may be subject to a right of appeal on points of law only or, when provided for in the European law establishing the specialised court, a right of appeal also on matters of fact, before the General Court.

4. The members of the specialised courts shall be chosen from persons whose independence is beyond doubt and who possess the ability required for appointment to judicial office. They shall be appointed by the Council, acting unanimously.

5. The specialised courts shall establish their Rules of Procedure in agreement with the Court of Justice. Those Rules shall require the consent of the Council.

6. Unless the European law establishing the specialised court provides otherwise, the provisions of the Constitution relating to the Court of Justice of the European Union and the provisions of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union shall apply to the specialised courts. Title I of the Statute and Article 64 thereof shall in any case apply to the specialised courts.

--------------------------------------------------
Searched for **https://www.ssa.gov/pubs/EN-05-10157.pdf**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **https://www.ssa.gov/pubs/EN-05-10157.pdf**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
P.1 

OAR Box 1830 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

115) IV-C-81 

Docket Number: 

A-87-11 

Printed 11/13/2008 7:20:57 AM Sheet 115 of 232 
yp**'*^ 

Pj^ 

^ ^ % UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

WjJ * WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

FeTS 2J^"b W 

OFFICE OF 

AIR AND RADIATION 

Honorable Buddy Mackay 

House of Representatives 

Washington, D.C. 20515 

Dear Mr. Mackay: 

Thank you for passing along the comments from your 

constituent, Mr. Barney. R. Newsome, concerning EPA's proposal 

to require onboard refueling emission controls. Be assured that 

these comments will be considered as we prepare our final rule. 

We will also be placing them in the public docket for the 

rulemaking (Docket No. A-87-11). ? 

Thank you again for your concern in this matter. 

Sincerely yours, 

Richard D. Wilson 

Director, Office of Mobile Sources 

cc: Docket A-87-11 

Prepared by: Form Letter:sal:2/18/88:AL880660 - Ann Arbor, MI 

bcc: Region 04 

Congressional Liaison/Quinn 

Docket A-87-11 c/o Jackie McManus