alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 174 (Monday, September 9, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 55134]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-21882]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8453]

Culturally Significant Object Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Iran Modern''

ACTION: Notice, correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On August 8, 2013, notice was published on page 48539 of the 
Federal Register (volume 78, number 153) of determinations made by the 
Department of State pertaining to the exhibit ``Iran Modern.'' The 
referenced notice is corrected to accommodate an additional object to 
be included in the exhibition. Pursuant to the authority vested in me 
by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), 
Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and 
Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 
note, et seq.), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and 
Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000 (and, as 
appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 257 of April 15, 2003), I 
hereby determine that the additional object to be included in the 
exhibition ``Iran Modern,'' imported from abroad for temporary 
exhibition within the United States, is of cultural significance. The 
additional object is imported pursuant to a loan agreement with the 
foreign owner or custodian. I also determine that the exhibition or 
display of the additional exhibit object at The Asia Society in New 
York, New York, from on or about September 6, 2013, until on or about 
January 5, 2014, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet 
to be determined, is in the national interest. I have ordered that 
Public Notice of these Determinations be published in the Federal 
Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects that includes this additional object, 
contact Ona M. Hahs, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, 
U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-6473). The mailing address 
is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), 
Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: August 29, 2013.
Lee Satterfield,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, 
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2013-21882 Filed 9-6-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
# EUR-Lex - 12004V191 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V191

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART III — THE POLICIES AND FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - TITLE III — INTERNAL POLICIES AND ACTION - CHAPTER II — ECONOMIC AND MONETARY POLICY - Section 2 — Monetary policy - Article III-191 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0084 - 0084 *

Article III-191

Without prejudice to the powers of the European Central Bank, European laws or framework laws shall lay down the measures necessary for use of the euro as the single currency. Such laws or framework laws shall be adopted after consultation of the European Central Bank.

--------------------------------------------------
# EUR-Lex - 12002E289 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 12002E289

**Treaty establishing the European Community (Nice consolidated version) - Part Six: General and Final Provisions - Article 289 - Article 216 - EC Treaty (Maastricht consolidated version) - Article 216 - EEC Treaty **

*
Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0147 - 0147 Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0295 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0075 - Consolidated version (EEC Treaty - no official publication available) *

Treaty establishing the European Community (Nice consolidated version)

Part Six: General and Final Provisions

Article 289

Article 216 - EC Treaty (Maastricht consolidated version)

Article 216 - EEC Treaty

Article 289

The seat of the institutions of the Community shall be determined by common accord of the governments of the Member States.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In the Matter of

LOUIS FRANCIS CAPUTO :

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 2410 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

No. 140 DB 2017

Attorney Registration No. 93175

( Allegheny County)

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 10 th day of January, 2019 , on certification by the Disciplina ry

Board that Louis Francis Caputo , who was suspended on consent for a period of one

year, has filed a verified statement showing compliance with the order of suspension and

Pa.R.D.E. 217

, Louis Francis Caputo is reinstated to active status.
###### Editorial Note on Part 622

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 622 appear at 79 FR 57837, Sept. 26, 2014 and at 81 FR 32253, May 23, 2016.

#### § 622.517 [Reserved]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

# PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION:

Mr. Robert Biersack, Press Officer.

Mary W. Dove,

Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 06-8376 Filed 9-26-06; 2:51 pm]

BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
PURCHASE AGREEMENT FOR FEE SIMPLE UNDIVIDED INTEREST AND
                         ASSIGNMENT
                             OF
                     NET LEASE AGREEMENT

      THIS ASSIGNMENT made and entered into this 28th day of
December,  1998, by and between AEI REAL ESTATE  FUND  XVIII
LIMITED   PARTNERSHIP,  a  Minnesota  Limited   Partnership,
("Assignor")  and  AEI NET LEASE INCOME &  GROWTH  FUND  XIX
LIMITED   PARTNERSHIP,  a  Minnesota  limited   partnership,
("Assignee");

     WITNESSETH, that:

      WHEREAS,  on the 28th day of December, 1998,  Assignor
entered   into   Commitment,  Net  Lease  Agreement,   ("the
Agreements") for that certain property located at 6959  East
Broad Street, Columbus, OH (the "Property") with Tumbleweed,
LLC, as Seller/Lessee; and

      WHEREAS,  Assignor  desires  to  assign  an  undivided
interest of its rights, title and interest in, to and  under
the  Agreement  and  as to the fee simple  interest  in  the
Leased Premises to the Assignees as hereinafter provided;

     AEI NET LEASE INCOME & GROWTH FUND XIX
     LIMITED PARTNERSHIP                          60.00%
     undivided interest as tenant in common

      NOW, THEREFORE, for One Dollar ($1.00) and other  good
and  valuable  consideration, receipt  of  which  is  hereby
acknowledged,  it is hereby agreed between  the  parties  as
follows:

     1.    Assignor  maintains as tenant in common  a  forty
     percent (40.00%) right, title and interest in,  to  and
     under the Agreements and in the fee simple interest  in
     the  Leased Premises, to have and to hold the same unto
     its successors and assigns;

     2.    Assignor  assigns all of its  rights,  title  and
     interest in, to and under the Agreements and in the fee
     simple  interest in the Leased Premises to the Assignee
     as  noted above, to have and to hold the same unto  the
     Assignee, its successors and assigns;

     3.    Assignee  hereby  assumes all  rights,  promises,
     covenants,   conditions  and  obligations   under   the
     Agreements  to be performed by the Assignor thereunder,
     and  agrees  to be bound for all of the obligations  of
     Assignor under the Agreements from this day forward.

     4.     The   Purchase  Price  paid  by  the   Assignees
     designated herein is equal to the prorata share of  the
     amounts funded as of the date of this Agreement.

All  other  terms  and  conditions of the  Agreements  shall
remain unchanged and continue in full force and effect.

AEI REAL ESTATE FUND XVIII LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
("Assignor")

BY:  AEI FUND MANAGEMENT XVIII, INC.


By: /s/ Robert P Johnson
        Robert P. Johnson, its President


AEI NET LEASE INCOME & GROWTH FUND XIX
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ("Assignee")

BY: AEI FUND MANAGEMENT XIX, INC.


By: /s/ Robert P Johnson
        Robert P. Johnson, its President
Exhibit 23.1



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



The Board of Directors

Del Monte Foods
Company:



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-108625) and Form S-8 (Nos. 333-40867, 333-52226, 333-38394, 333-34280, 333-79315, 333-102702, 333-102700, and 333-102006) of Del Monte Foods Company (the Company) of our reports dated July 8, 2005, with respect to the
consolidated balance sheets of Del Monte Foods Company and subsidiaries as of May 1, 2005 and May 1, 2004, and related consolidated statements of income, stockholders equity and comprehensive income and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended May 1, 2005, managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of May 1, 2005 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of May 1, 2005, which reports
appear in the May 1, 2005 annual report on Form 10-K of Del Monte Foods Company. Our report refers to a change on April 28, 2003 in the Companys method for accounting for stock-based compensation.



/s/    KPMG LLPKPMG LLP




San Francisco, California

July 8, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       1,721,388
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   89,046
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,810,434
<PP&E>                                       4,367,772
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,836,846
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,341,360
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          135,595
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,205,765
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,341,360
<SALES>                                        585,768
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               749,002
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               551,094
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                197,908
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            197,908
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   197,908
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Exhibit
      32.01







CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350






The
      undersigned hereby certifies that to his knowledge the annual report of Sonic
      Corp. (the “Company”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
      date hereof fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such
      report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and
      results of operations of the Company.











Date:
                October 26, 2007/s/
                J. Clifford HudsonJ.
                Clifford Hudson,Chief
                Executive Officer
§ 600.805 Purpose and scope. ( a ) *Purpose.* This subpart provides guidelines for Councils and the Secretary to use in adding the required EFH provisions to an FMP, i.e., description and identification of EFH, adverse effects on EFH (including minimizing, to the extent practicable, adverse effects from fishing), and actions to conserve and enhance EFH.
( b ) *Scope* — ( 1 ) *Species covered.* An EFH provision in an FMP must include all fish species in the fishery management unit (FMU). An FMP may describe, identify, and protect the habitat of species not in an FMU; however, such habitat may not be considered EFH for the purposes of sections 303(a)(7) and 305(b) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act.
( 2 ) *Geographic.* EFH may be described and identified in waters of the United States, as defined in 33 CFR 328.3, and in the exclusive economic zone, as defined in § 600.10. Councils may describe, identify, and protect habitats of managed species beyond the exclusive economic zone; however, such habitat may not be considered EFH for the purposes of sections 303(a)(7) and 305(b) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act. Activities that may adversely affect such habitat can be addressed through any process conducted in accordance with international agreements between the United States and the foreign nation(s) undertaking or authorizing the action.
#### § 665.398 Management area.

The Mariana fishery management area is the EEZ seaward of Guam and CNMI with the inner boundary a line coterminous with the seaward boundaries of Guam and CNMI and the outer boundary a line drawn in such a manner that each point on it is 200 nautical miles from the baseline from which the territorial sea is measured, or is coterminous with adjacent international maritime boundaries.
# EUR-Lex - 12007L/AFI/DCL/56 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12007L/AFI/DCL/56

**Treaty of Lisbon amending the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Community, signed at Lisbon, 13 December 2007 - B. Declarations concerning Protocols annexed to the Treaties - 56. Declaration by Ireland on Article 3 of the Protocol on the position of the United Kingdom and Ireland in respect of the area of freedom, security and justice **

*
Official Journal 306 , 17/12/2007 P. 0268 - 0269 *

56. Declaration by Ireland on Article 3 of the Protocol on the position of the United Kingdom and Ireland in respect of the area of freedom, security and justice

Ireland affirms its commitment to the Union as an area of freedom, security and justice respecting fundamental rights and the different legal systems and traditions of the Member States within which citizens are provided with a high level of safety.

Accordingly, Ireland declares its firm intention to exercise its right under Article 3 of the Protocol on the position of the United Kingdom and Ireland in respect of the area of freedom, security and justice to take part in the adoption of measures pursuant to Title IV of Part Three of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to the maximum extent it deems possible.

Ireland will, in particular, participate to the maximum possible extent in measures in the field of police cooperation.

Furthermore, Ireland recalls that in accordance with Article 8 of the Protocol it may notify the Council in writing that it no longer wishes to be covered by the terms of the Protocol. Ireland intends to review the operation of these arrangements within three years of the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon.

--------------------------------------------------
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1. FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### July 2, 2008 Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

EARNEST WILSON, Petitioner-Appellant,

v. DUKE TERRELL, Warden Respondent-Appellee. No. 08-3136 (D.C. No. 5:07-CV-03197-RDR) (D. Kansas)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before KELLY , McCONNELL, andGORSUCH , Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. The petitioner appeals the dismissal by the United States District2 Court for the District of Kansas of his petition for writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. We affirm. The petitioner challenged a criminal judgment entered by the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. He alleged that he is being illegally held because the sentencing court had no right to resentence him without another plea or a trial, that the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction, and that he was denied effective assistance of counsel. He also challenged the dismissal of a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion he filed on the ground that it was a second/successive motion. Normally, “‘[a] petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 attacks the execution of a sentence rather than its validity and must be filed in the district where the prisoner is confined. A [section 2255 motion] attacks the legality of detention, and must be filed in the district that imposed the sentence.’” Haugh v. Booker, 210 F.3d 1147, 1149 (10th Cir.2000) (quoting Bradshaw v. Story , 86 F.3d 164, 166 (10th Cir.1996)). See also United States v. Eccleston , 521 F.3d 1249, 1253 (10th Cir. 2008) (“A challenge to the propriety of the federal conviction itself ... must proceed under § 2255, not § 2241.”) (citation omitted). Section 2241 “is not an additional, alternative, or supplemental remedy to 28 U.S.C. § 2255.” Bradshaw , 86 F.3d at 166. Only if the petitioner shows that § 2255 is “inadequate or ineffective” to challenge the validity of a judgment or sentence may a prisoner petition for3 such a remedy under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Id

. The petitioner has not established the inadequacy or ineffectiveness of 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The mere fact that he was denied relief under § 2255 does not render it inadequate or ineffective. Id . “Failure to obtain relief under § 2255 does not establish that the remedy so provided is either inadequate or ineffective.” Id . (quotation omitted). Accordingly, the district court judgment is AFFIRMED . The mandate shall issue forthwith.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT PER CURIAM
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 541

To amend the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and

Liability Act of 1980 (Superfund) to establish a maximum limit of

liability for municipalities and other persons liable under that Act for

the generation or transportation of municipal solid waste.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 21, 1993

Mr. SMITH of New Jersey introduced the following bill; which was referred

to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

A BILL

To amend the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (Superfund) to establish a maximum limit of liability for municipalities

and other persons liable under that Act for the generation or transportation of municipal solid waste.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Toxic Pollution

5 Responsibility Act of 1993’’.
2

•HR 541 IH

1 SEC. 2. LIABILITY FOR CERTAIN SUBSTANCES.

2 (a) GENERATION AND TRANSPORTATION OF MUNICI3 PAL SOLID WASTE—Section 107 of the Comprehensive

4 Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act

5 of 1980 (42 U.S.C. 9607), commonly referred to as

6 ‘‘Superfund’’, is amended by adding at the end the follow7 ing new subsection:

8 ‘‘(n) LIMITATION ON LIABILITY FOR GENERATION

9 OR TRANSPORTATION OF MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE.—

10 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—No municipality or other

11 person liable for any costs or damages under para12 graph (3) or (4) of subsection (a) of this section by

13 reason of such municipality or other person’s gen14 eration or transportation of municipal solid waste

15 shall be liable for more than 4 percent of such costs

16 and damages.

17 ‘‘(2) DEFINITIONS.—As used in this sub18 section—

19 ‘‘(A) the term ‘municipality’ means any po20 litical subdivision of a State, including any city,

21 county, town, township, school district, and

22 other legal government entity; and

23 ‘‘(B) the term ‘municipal solid waste’

24 means solid waste generated by households and

25 includes waste from commercial, institutional,

26 and industrial sources if the amount and tox-
3

•HR 541 IH

1 icity of substances contained in the waste do

2 not exceed that which one would expect to find

3 in waste generated by households.

4 ‘‘(3) GUIDELINES.—The Administrator may

5 promulgate guidelines to be used in determining the

6 waste which qualifies as municipal solid waste under

7 paragraph (2)(B).’’.

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

9 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to response actions

10 and suits brought under the Comprehensive Environ11 mental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of

12 1980 whether such response action or suits are com13 menced before, on, and after the date of the enactment

14 of this Act; except that such amendment shall not apply

15 to any suit brought under such Act in which final judg16 ment has been entered by a court before the date of the

17 enactment of this Act.

Æ