alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EUR-Lex - 12002E081 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 12002E081

**Treaty establishing the European Community (Nice consolidated version) - Part Three: Community policies - Title VI: Common rules on competition, taxation and approximation of laws - Chapter 1: Rules on competition - Section 1: Rules applying to undertakings - Article 81 - Article 85 - EC Treaty (Maastricht consolidated version) - Article 85 - EEC Treaty **

*
Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0064 - 0065 Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0208 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0028 - Consolidated version (EEC Treaty - no official publication available) *

Treaty establishing the European Community (Nice consolidated version)

Part Three: Community policies

Title VI: Common rules on competition, taxation and approximation of laws

Chapter 1: Rules on competition

Section 1: Rules applying to undertakings

Article 81

Article 85 - EC Treaty (Maastricht consolidated version)

Article 85 - EEC Treaty

Article 81

1. The following shall be prohibited as incompatible with the common market: all agreements between undertakings, decisions by associations of undertakings and concerted practices which may affect trade between Member States and which have as their object or effect the prevention, restriction or distortion of competition within the common market, and in particular those which:

(a) directly or indirectly fix purchase or selling prices or any other trading conditions;

(b) limit or control production, markets, technical development, or investment;

(c) share markets or sources of supply;

(d) apply dissimilar conditions to equivalent transactions with other trading parties, thereby placing them at a competitive disadvantage;

(e) make the conclusion of contracts subject to acceptance by the other parties of supplementary obligations which, by their nature or according to commercial usage, have no connection with the subject of such contracts.

2. Any agreements or decisions prohibited pursuant to this article shall be automatically void.

3. The provisions of paragraph 1 may, however, be declared inapplicable in the case of:

- any agreement or category of agreements between undertakings,

- any decision or category of decisions by associations of undertakings,

- any concerted practice or category of concerted practices,

which contributes to improving the production or distribution of goods or to promoting technical or economic progress, while allowing consumers a fair share of the resulting benefit, and which does not:

(a) impose on the undertakings concerned restrictions which are not indispensable to the attainment of these objectives;

(b) afford such undertakings the possibility of eliminating competition in respect of a substantial part of the products in question.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without **

oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

AR/Research

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

VERONICA ORTEGA-CAMACHO,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 06-73494

Agency No. A079-635-249

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 17, 2009** 

Before: ALARCÓN, TROTT, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.

Veronica Ortega-Camacho, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for

review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) denying her

motion to reopen removal proceedings. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C.

FILED

DEC 09 2009

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
AR/Research 2 06-73494

§ 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, 

Ordonez v. INS, 345 F.3d 777, 782 (9th Cir. 2003), and we dismiss in part and

deny in part the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s decision not to invoke its sua

sponte authority to reopen proceedings under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a). See Ekimian v.

INS, 303 F.3d 1153, 1159 (9th Cir. 2002). 

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Ortega’s motion to reopen as

untimely because it was filed over one year after the BIA’s final order of removal,

see 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(7)(C)(i) (motion to reopen must be filed within ninety

days of final order of removal), and Ortega did not establish that any of the

enumerated exceptions to the timeliness rule apply, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(3),

nor did she show she was entitled to equitable tolling, see Iturribarria v. INS, 321

F.3d 889, 897 (9th Cir. 2003) (deadline for filing motion to reopen can be

equitably tolled “when petitioner is prevented from filing because of deception,

fraud, or error, as long as the petitioner acts with due diligence”).

The record belies Ortega’s contention that the BIA abused its discretion by

failing to offer a reasoned explanation for its denial. See Celis-Castellano v.

Ashcroft, 298 F.3d 888, 891 (9th Cir. 2002) (unless BIA acted arbitrarily,

irrationally, or contrary to law, Court of Appeals should not disturb its ruling). 
AR/Research 3 06-73494

Finally, Ortega’s contention that the agency violated her due process right to

family unity is foreclosed by De Mercado v. Mukasey, 566 F.3d 810, 816 (9th Cir.

2009). 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part and DENIED in part.
Case 16-26513 Doc 12 Filed 09/12/16 Entered 09/13/16 06:45:19 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 5412 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the amount 

excludable for dependent care assistance programs. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 3, 2024 

Mr. KENNEDY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase 

the amount excludable for dependent care assistance programs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘The Dependent Care 

5 Flexible Spending Account Expansion Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INCREASE IN AMOUNT EXCLUDABLE FOR DEPEND7 ENT CARE ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 129(a)(2)(A) of the Inter9 nal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ‘‘$5,000 

10 ($2,500’’ and inserting ‘‘$7,500 ($3,750’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 5412 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

3 December 31, 2024. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
# EUR-Lex - 12006E165 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12006E165

**Treaty establishing the European Community (consolidated version) - Part Three - Community policies - TITLE XVIII - Research and technological development - Article 165 **

*
Official Journal C 321 E , 29/12/2006 P. 0121 - 0121 Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0106 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0252 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0051 - Consolidated version *

Article 165

1. The Community and the Member States shall coordinate their research and technological development activities so as to ensure that national policies and Community policy are mutually consistent.

2. In close cooperation with the Member State, the Commission may take any useful initiative to promote the coordination referred to in paragraph 1.

--------------------------------------------------
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID** 

### 07951 **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name 3**  **Description File Name**  **3** 

### 07951\07951_Certification Statement.pdf Plant certification statement 

### x 07951\07951_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook



### 07951\07951_Completeness Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 

### x 07951\07951_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file 

### x 07951\07951_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file 

### x 07951\07951_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file 

### x 07951\07951_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file 

### x 07951\07951_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file 

### x 07951\Supporting Documentation\07951_A5-2-CMPP-Map1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### x 07951\Supporting Documentation\07951_Columbia A5-3 Water Mass Balance.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### x 07951\Supporting Documentation\07951_Columbia D3-1 Block Diagram 1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket. 3No hardcopy log is included for this plant as no hardcopy materials were received.
#### Mary Lomas, Respondent, v. New York City Railway Company, Appellant.

(Argued April 30, 1907;

decided May 21, 1907.)

*Lomas*v. *New York City Ry. Co.,*111 App. Div. 332, affirmed.

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered March 2, 1906, reversing a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the 'complaint by the court at a Trial Term and granting a new trial in an action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained through defendant’s negligence.

*Charles F. Brown,-Bayard H. Ames, Anthony J. Frnest*and *James L. Quaolcenbush*for appellant.

*Herbert li. Bimbitrg*for respondent.

Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered against appellant on the stipulation, with costs in all courts; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Yann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ. Dissenting: Gray and O’Brien, JJ.
Case 16-27006 Doc 5 Filed 08/23/16 Entered 08/23/16 11:37:41 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2
Case 16-27006 Doc 5 Filed 08/23/16 Entered 08/23/16 11:37:41 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2
§ 1239.22 How does NARA notify the agency of the inspection? ( a ) Once NARA identifies the need to conduct an agency inspection, the Archivist of the United States sends a letter to the head of the agency. If the agency being inspected is a component of a cabinet department, the letter will be addressed to the head of the component, with a copy sent to the head of the department. NARA will also send copies to the agency's records officer. The letter will include: ( 1 ) Notification that NARA intends to conduct an inspection, the records that will be inspected, and the issues to be addressed;
( 2 ) A beginning date for the inspection that is no more than 30 days after the date of the letter; and
( 3 ) A request that the agency appoint a point of contact who will assist NARA in conducting the inspection.
( b ) If the agency does not respond to NARA's notification letter, NARA will use its statutory authority under 44 U.S.C. 2904(c)(8) to report the matter to the agency's congressional oversight committee and to the Office of Management and Budget.
EXHIBIT
31.2




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER




I, Melvin
L. Williams, hereby certify that:




1.  I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Searchlight Minerals
Corp.;




2.  Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.  Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;




4.  The
registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:




(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;




(b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and




(c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and





5.  The
registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):




(a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and




(b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.




SEARCHLIGHT
      MINERALS CORP.Date:  July
      6, 2009
                    By:
                    /s/ MELVIN L. WILLIAMSMelvin
      L. WilliamsChief
      Financial
Officer
EXHIBIT
31.2




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER




I, Melvin L. Williams, hereby
certify that:




1.  I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Searchlight Minerals
Corp.;




2.  Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.  Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;




4.The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and have:




(a)  Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;





(b)  Evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and





(c)  Disclosed
in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and





5.  The
registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):




(a)  All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and





(b)  Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.




SEARCHLIGHT
      MINERALS CORP.Date:  July
      6, 2009
              By:
              /s/ MELVIN L. WILLIAMSMelvin L.
    WilliamsChief Financial
Officer
NOTE : This order is nonprecedential. 

# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________ SEAH STEEL CORP., Plaintiff

- Appellant
HUSTEEL CO., LTD., NEXTEEL CO., LTD., AJU BESTEEL CO., LTD., ILJIN STEEL CORPORATION, HYUNDAI STEEL COMPANY, Plaintiffs

v. UNITED STATES, UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION, VALLOUREC STAR, L.P., WELDED TUBE USA INC., Defendants

- Appellees
MAVERICK TUBE CORP., TENARIS BAY CITY, INC., IPSCO TUBULARS INC., Defendants

______________________ 2023

- 1657

______________________ A ppeal from the United States Court of International Trade in No. 1:19

- cv
- 00086

- JCG, 1:19

- cv
- 00091

- JCG, 1:19

- cv
- 00092

- JCG, 1:19

- cv
- 00100

- JCG, 1:19

- cv
- 00101

- JCG , Judge Jennifer Choe

- Groves.

______________________ Case: 23-1657 Document: 11 Page: 1 Filed: 05/09/2023S E AH S TEEL C ORP

. V

. US 2

O R D E R The parties having so agreed, it i s ordered that: (1) The proceeding is DISMISSED under Fed. R. App. P. 42 (b). (2) Each side shall bear their own costs.

FOR THE COURT

May 9, 2023 Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: May 9, 2023 Case: 23-1657 Document: 11 Page: 2 Filed: 05/09/2023
§ 1260.74 What are agency responsibilities after receiving an MDR request forwarded by NARA? ( a ) The agency receiving the referral will promptly process and review the referral for declassification and public release on a line-by-line basis in accordance with section 3.5(c) of the Order and communicate its review decisions to NARA.
( b ) The agency must notify NARA of any other agency to which it forwards the request in those cases requiring the declassification determination of another agency to which NARA has not already sent a referral for review.
( c ) The agency must return to NARA a complete copy of each referred document with the agency determination clearly stated to leave no doubt about the status of the information and the authority for its continued classification or its declassification.
**Exhibit 2**

 

**CLAYTON UTZ**

 

**Share and Asset Sale Deed - Hospitals**

**(excluding collocated and privatised hospitals)**

 

**Mayne Group Limited ABN 56 004 073 410**

MGL 

 

**Mayne Healthcare Holdings Pty Limited ABN 16 078 954 631**

MHH 

 

**Australian Newco Holdings Pty Limited ACN 106 722 347**

Buyer 

 

**The entities listed in Schedule 14**

Other Indemnifying Parties 

 

If you have any questions about the details of this document 

**pleasecontact Rod Halstead on + 61 2 9353 4000**

 

Clayton Utz Lawyers 

Levels 22-35 No. 1 O’Connell Street Sydney NSW 2000 Australia 

PO BoxH3 Australia Square Sydney NSW 1215 

T + 61 2 9353 4000 F + 61 2 8220 6700 

 

**www.claytonutz.com**

 

Our reference Rod Halstead/Jonathan Algar/21724491 

 

Liability limited by the Solicitors Scheme, approved under the Professional Standards Act 1994 (NSW) and by our Terms of Engagement 

**Table of Contents**

 

**1.**
  **Definitions and interpretation**  **2**   1.1  Definitions  2   1.2  Procurement by MGL  15   1.3  Umbrella Deed  15   1.4  Other Indemnifying Parties  16
**2.**
  **Sale of Sale Shares and Assets**  **16**   2.1  Sale of Sale Shares  16   2.2  Sale of Assets  16   2.3  Purchase Price  16   2.4  Missing Titles  16   2.5  Sold Properties  16
**3.**
  **Completion**  **17**   3.1  Completion place and date  17   3.2  Seller’s obligations on Completion  17   3.3  Buyer’s obligations on Completion  19   3.4  Delivery  20   3.5  Title  20   3.6  Risk  20   3.7  Interdependence  20   3.8  Notice to complete  20   3.9  Conduct until Sale Shares are registered  21   3.10  Storage of Disclosure Material  21
**4.**
  **Novation and Assignment of Hospital Business Contracts -Seller Group and Equipment Leases -**
From: Elliot Berke

To: Joseph Wenzinger

Subject: Data Vault I & Data Vault II

Date: Wednesday, October 5, 2022 3:14:55 PM

As per our conversation, we agree to an additional 30-day extension for the Commission’s

consideration of Advisory Opinion Requests 2022-22 and 2022-23.

Elliot S. Berke

Managing Partner

Berke Farah LLP

701 8th St. NW, Suite 620

Washington, DC 20001

202.744.0894 (Tel.)

eberke@berkefarah.com

http://www.berkefarah.com

This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient,

please advise by return e-mail and delete immediately without reading forwarding to others. The

following statement is provided pursuant to U.S. Treasury Department Regulations: This

communication is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, by a taxpayer for the

purpose of avoiding penalties that the Internal Revenue Service may impose on the taxpayer.
<PAGE>   1


                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.3


            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS AND GEOLOGISTS

         We hereby consent to the reference of our firm in the HS Resources,
Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998, filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on March 30, 1999, and the
incorporation of the foregoing by reference in (a) the HS Resources, Inc.
Registration Statement on Form S-3 initially filed with the SEC on February 5,
1997, and any amendments thereof; (b) the HS Resources, Inc. Registration
Statement on Form S-3 initially filed with the SEC on February 12, 1998; and (c)
the HS Resources, Inc. Registration Statements on Form S-8 initially filed with
the SEC on April 21, 1993, May 5, 1995, October 29, 1998, and January 25, 1999,
and any amendments thereof.

                                    /s/ Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc.
                                   --------------------------------------------
                                        Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc.



Dallas, Texas
March 30, 1999
§ 1150.12 Complainants. ( a ) Any person may submit a complaint to the A&TBCB alleging that a building or facility does not comply with applicable standards issued under the Architectural Barriers Act. Complaints must be in writing and should be sent to: Executive Director, Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board, 1111 18th Street, Suite 501, Washington, DC 20036-3894. A complaint form is available at the above address. Complaints may, but need not, contain (1) the complainant's name and where he/she may be reached, (2) the facility or building and, if known, the funding agency, and (3) a brief description of the barriers. A complaint form is available at the above address.
( b ) The A&TBCB shall hold in confidence the identity of all persons submitting complaints unless the person submits a written authorization otherwise.
( c ) The A&TBCB shall give or mail to the complainant a copy of these regulations.
( d ) A complainant is not a party to the proceedings as a matter of course, but may petition the judge to participate under § 1150.13.
( e ) The A&TBCB shall send the complainant a copy of the final order issued by the judge. The complainant has standing to obtain judicial review of that order.
[53 FR 39473, Oct. 7, 1988]