alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 5346 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to establish a minimum 

Medicaid disproportionate share hospital allotment for States. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 19, 2024 

Mr. BARRASSO (for himself, Mr. SCHATZ, Mr. CRAMER, and Mr. WELCH) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to establish 

a minimum Medicaid disproportionate share hospital allotment for States. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Delivering Support for 

5 Hospitals Act’’ or the ‘‘DSH Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. MINIMUM MEDICAID DSH ALLOTMENT. 

7 Section 1923(f)(6) of the Social Security Act (42 

8 U.S.C. 1396r–4(f)(6)) is amended by adding at the end 

9 the following new subparagraph: 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 5346 IS

1 ‘‘(C) MINIMUM DSH ALLOTMENT FOR FIS2 CAL YEARS AFTER 2024.— 

3 ‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding 

4 the table set forth in paragraph (2) or the 

5 reductions required under paragraph (7), 

6 for fiscal year 2025 and each succeeding 

7 fiscal year, the DSH allotment for any 

8 State shall not be less than the minimum 

9 DSH allotment amount established for the 

10 fiscal year under clause (ii). 

11 ‘‘(ii) MINIMUM DSH ALLOTMENT

12 AMOUNT.—The minimum DSH allotment 

13 amount established under this clause— 

14 ‘‘(I) for each of fiscal years 2025 

15 through 2029, shall be equal to 

16 $20,000,000; and 

17 ‘‘(II) for fiscal year 2030 and 

18 each succeeding fiscal year, shall be 

19 equal to the minimum DSH allotment 

20 amount established under this clause 

21 for the preceding fiscal year, subject 

22 to an increase for inflation as pro23 vided in paragraph (3)(A).’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
# EUR-Lex - 12005SP005 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12005SP005

**Protocol concerning the conditions and arrangements for admission of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania to the European Union - PART ONE:PRINCIPLES - Article 5 **

*
Official Journal L 157 , 21/06/2005 P. 0030 - 0030 *

Article 5

Bulgaria and Romania shall participate in Economic and Monetary Union from the date of accession as Member States with a derogation within the meaning of Article III-197 of the Constitution.

--------------------------------------------------
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.2 



AMENDMENT TO THE 
CONSOLIDATED EDISON 
RETIREMENT PLAN


Amending the Retirement Plan to 
Add an Additional Emergency Exception
 to the Suspension of Benefit Rules


Effective March 27, 2020














Page 1 of 3


Amendment Adding Emergency Exception to Suspension of Benefit Rules    


Exhibit 10.2 





WHEREAS, pursuant to Article X, Amendment, Merger and Termination, Section 10.01, Amendment of the Plan, the Plan Administrator has the authority to amend certain provisions of the Consolidated Edison Retirement Plan (the “Retirement Plan”); and
WHEREAS, the Vice President – Human Resources, as Plan Administrator, is authorized to execute the specified amendments to the Retirement Plan, her execution to be evidence conclusively of her approval thereof;
NOW, therefore, the Retirement Plan is amended as set forth below:


























Page 2 of 3


Amendment Adding Emergency Exception to Suspension of Benefit Rules    


Exhibit 10.2 



Article III, Section 3.04(c), is amended, by adding at the end of the section, the following:


iv.    A declared public health emergency or natural disaster that significantly impacts the Company’s or the CEI affiliate’s ability to provide utility service to its customers.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this instrument to be executed on this 27th day of March, 2020.


/s/ Nancy Shannon 
Vice President of Human Resources of
Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.
And the Plan Administrator of the Retirement Plan














        
Page 3 of 3


Amendment Adding Emergency Exception to Suspension of Benefit Rules
#### § 550.102 Application.

This part applies to all programs or activities conducted by the agency.
Exhibit 32.1

                      ___________________________________


    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Innovative Software Technologies, Inc
(the  "Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending June 30, 2003,  as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Douglas S. Hackett, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to  18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

      (1)  the Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
           15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)  the  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
           material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations
           of the Company.




/s/ Douglas S. Hackett
----------------------------
Douglas S. Hackett
Chief Executive Officer
August 14, 2003
Editorial Note on Part 622
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 622 appear at 79 FR 57837, Sept. 26, 2014 and at 81 FR 32253, May 23, 2016.

§ 622.51 Recordkeeping and reporting. ( a ) *Commercial vessel owners and operators* — ( 1 ) *General reporting requirement.* The owner or operator of a vessel that fishes for shrimp in the Gulf EEZ or in adjoining state waters, or that lands shrimp in an adjoining state, must provide information for any fishing trip, as requested by the SRD, including, but not limited to, vessel identification, gear, effort, amount of shrimp caught by species, shrimp condition (heads on/heads off), fishing areas and depths, and person to whom sold.
( 2 ) *Electronic logbook reporting.* The owner or operator of a vessel for which a Federal commercial vessel permit for Gulf shrimp has been issued and who is selected by the SRD must participate in the NMFS-sponsored electronic logbook reporting program as directed by the SRD. In addition, such owner or operator must provide information regarding the size and number of shrimp trawls deployed and the type of bycatch reduction device (BRD) and turtle excluder device used, as directed by the SRD. Compliance with the reporting requirements of this paragraph (a)(2) is required for permit renewal.
( 3 ) *Vessel and Gear Characterization Form.* All owners or operators of vessels applying for or renewing a commercial vessel moratorium permit for Gulf shrimp must complete an annual Gulf Shrimp Vessel and Gear Characterization Form. The form will be provided by NMFS at the time of permit application and renewal. Compliance with this reporting requirement is required for permit issuance and renewal.
( 4 ) *Landings report.* The owner or operator of a vessel for which a Federal commercial vessel permit for Gulf shrimp has been issued must annually report the permitted vessel's total annual landings of shrimp and value, by species, on a form provided by the SRD. Compliance with this reporting requirement is required for permit renewal.
( b ) *Gulf shrimp dealers.* A person who purchases shrimp from a vessel, or person, that fishes for shrimp in the Gulf EEZ or in adjoining state waters, or that lands shrimp in an adjoining state, must provide the following information when requested by the SRD: ( 1 ) Name and official number of the vessel from which shrimp were received or the name of the person from whom shrimp were received, if received from other than a vessel.
( 2 ) Amount of shrimp received by species and size category for each receipt.
( 3 ) Ex-vessel value, by species and size category, for each receipt.
Hillsborough,

No. 4734.

#### Travelers Indemnity Company *& a. v.*Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company *& a.*

Argued May 6, 1959.

Decided July 10, 1959.

*208*Booth, Wadleigh, Langdell, Starr & Peters (Mr. Booth*orally), for the plaintiffs.

*209*Upton, Sanders*cfc *Upton {Mr. Sanders*orally), for defendant Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company.

*Sleeper & Mullavey*and *Edward E. Williams {Mr. Williams*orally), for defendants Ella E. Hall and Alice M. Hall.

*McLane, Carleton, Graf, Greene & Brown*and *David L. Nixon {Mr. Nixon*orally), for defendant Shirley E. Brusseau.

Wheeler, J.

At a pre-trial conference at which all parties were represented by counsel, it was stipulated, among other things, that a special verdict should be submitted to the jury in the precise form subsequently given in the Court’s instructions. Rule 48 of the Superior Court Rules (99 N. H. 615) provides that the Court shall make an order which recites the action taken at a pre-trial conference, the agreements of the parties which limit the trial issues “and such order when entered controls the subsequent course of the action, unless modified at the trial to prevent manifested injustice.”

On the record before us we see no abuse of discretion in the Court’s finding that modification of the order was not required under Rule 48. The exception is therefore overruled.

Counsel for the Travelers Indemnity Company and Brusseau, adm’x, contend it was error to admit the testimony of chief Davis of Auburn concerning a conversation he had with Alice Hall “after she got out of the hospital and when her mind was free and clear” to the effect that on the night in question Brusseau was driving the motor vehicle. Counsel argue that a prior consistent statement is inadmissible unless the witness has been impeached and that such testimony is self-serving and hearsay. However, counsel sought in cross-examination to impeach Alice’s testimony on the basis of her prior deposition and in argument sought to draw the inference of a change in her position and that she was less than candid. *Twardosky*v. *Company,*95 N. H. 279, 284; see *State*v. *Slocinski,*89 N. H. 262. We believe the evidence of chief Davis was competent.

*Exceptions overruled.*

All concurred.
Editorial Note on Part 622
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 622 appear at 79 FR 57837, Sept. 26, 2014 and at 81 FR 32253, May 23, 2016.

§ 622.225 Harvest limitations. ( a ) *Aquacultured live rock.* In the South Atlantic EEZ: ( 1 ) Aquacultured live rock may be harvested only under a permit, as required under § 622.220(a)(3), and aquacultured live rock on a site may be harvested only by the person, or his or her employee, contractor, or agent, who has been issued the aquacultured live rock permit for the site. A person harvesting aquacultured live rock is exempt from the prohibition on taking prohibited coral for such prohibited coral as attaches to aquacultured live rock.
( 2 ) The following restrictions apply to individual aquaculture activities: ( i ) No aquaculture site may exceed 1 acre (0.4 ha) in size.
( ii ) Material deposited on the aquaculture site— ( A ) May not be placed over naturally occurring reef outcrops, limestone ledges, coral reefs, or vegetated areas.
( B ) Must be free of contaminants.
( C ) Must be nontoxic.
( D ) Must be placed on the site by hand or lowered completely to the bottom under restraint, that is, not allowed to fall freely.
( E ) Must be placed from a vessel that is anchored.
( F ) Must be geologically distinguishable from the naturally occurring substrate and, in addition, may be indelibly marked or tagged.
( iii ) A minimum setback of at least 50 ft (15.2 m) must be maintained from natural vegetated or hard bottom habitats.
( 3 ) Mechanically dredging or drilling, or otherwise disturbing, aquacultured live rock is prohibited, and aquacultured live rock may be harvested only by hand.
( 4 ) The following activities are also prohibited: Chipping of aquacultured live rock in the EEZ, possession of chipped aquacultured live rock in or from the EEZ, removal of allowable octocoral or prohibited coral from aquacultured live rock in or from the EEZ, and possession of prohibited coral not attached to aquacultured live rock or allowable octocoral, while aquacultured live rock is in possession. See the definition of “Allowable octocoral” for clarification of the distinction between allowable octocoral and live rock. For the purposes of this paragraph (a)(4), chipping means breaking up reefs, ledges, or rocks into fragments, usually by means of a chisel and hammer.
( 5 ) Not less than 24 hours prior to harvest of aquacultured live rock, the owner or operator of the harvesting vessel must provide the following information to the NMFS Office for Law Enforcement, Southeast Region, St. Petersburg, FL, by telephone (727-824-5344): ( i ) Permit number of site to be harvested and date of harvest.
( ii ) Name and official number of the vessel to be used in harvesting.
( iii ) Date, port, and facility at which aquacultured live rock will be landed.
( b ) [Reserved]
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20463 

 June 2, 2023 

Via Electronic Mail

Leslie Lew

430 SW 13th Avenue 

Apt. 1909 

Portland, Oregon 97205 

Leslie.lew@practicehospitality.com 

 RE: MUR 8092 

 Bashar Wali et al.

Dear Mr. Lew: 

 This is to advise you that the file in this matter has been closed and this matter is now 

public. Documents related to the case will be placed on the public record within 30 days. See 

Statement of Policy Regarding Disclosure of Certain Documents in Enforcement and Other 

Matters, 81 Fed. Reg. 50,702 (Aug. 2, 2016). 

 If you have any questions, please contact me at (202) 746-8564. 

 Sincerely,

 Kimberly D. Hart

 Attorney 

MUR809200108
# EUR-Lex - 12008E036 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008E036

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - PART THREE: UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS - TITLE II: FREE MOVEMENT OF GOODS - Chapter 3: Prohibition of quantitative restrictions between Member States - Article 36 (ex Article 30 TEC) **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0061 - 0061 *

Article 36

(ex Article 30 TEC)

The provisions of Articles 34 and 35 shall not preclude prohibitions or restrictions on imports, exports or goods in transit justified on grounds of public morality, public policy or public security; the protection of health and life of humans, animals or plants; the protection of national treasures possessing artistic, historic or archaeological value; or the protection of industrial and commercial property. Such prohibitions or restrictions shall not, however, constitute a means of arbitrary discrimination or a disguised restriction on trade between Member States.

--------------------------------------------------
§ 1202.76 Can NARA deny my request for amendment? If the system manager denies your request to amend or determines that the record should be amended in a manner other than that requested by you, NARA will advise you in writing of the decision. The denial letter will state: ( a ) The reasons for the denial of your amendment request;
( b ) Proposed alternative amendments, if appropriate;
( c ) Your right to appeal the denial; and
( d ) The procedures for appealing the denial.
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20463

 

April 6, 2023 

 

VIA E-MAIL

mlaurenza@akingump.com

kgross@akingrump.com

kpaulsen@akingump.com

Melissa Laurenza

Kenneth Gross 

Kevin Paulsen

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

2001 K Street, NW

Washington, DC 20006 

 RE: MUR 8122 

Bryan H. Lawrence 

Elizabeth D. Lawrence

Dear Ms. Laurenza, Mr. Gross and Mr. Paulsen: 

This is in response to a request for an extension to respond to the complaint filed in the above 

mentioned matter we received on April 5, 2023. After considering the circumstances in this matter, 

the Office of General Counsel has granted the requested extension. Accordingly, the response is due 

on or before the close of business May 3, 2023. You may contact me if you have any questions at

cela@fec.gov.

 Sincerely, 

 

 Kathryn Ross, Paralegal

 Complaints Examination and 

 Legal Administration 

MUR812200019
# EUR-Lex - 12006E186 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12006E186

**Treaty establishing the European Community (consolidated version) - Part Four - Association of the overseas countries and territories - Article 186 **

*
Official Journal C 321 E , 29/12/2006 P. 0129 - 0129 Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0113 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0259 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0055 - Consolidated version (EEC Treaty - no official publication available) *

Article 186

Subject to the provisions relating to public health, public security or public policy, freedom of movement within Member States for workers from the countries and territories, and within the countries and territories for workers from Member States, shall be governed by agreements to be concluded subsequently with the unanimous approval of Member States.

--------------------------------------------------
#### § 1227.10 What are General Records Schedules (GRS)?

General Records Schedules (GRS) are schedules issued by the Archivist of the United States that authorize, after specified periods of time, the destruction of temporary records or the transfer to the National Archives of the United States of permanent records that are common to several or all agencies.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Delta Regional Authority","provider_url":"https:\/\/dra.gov","author_name":"AhaZapier","author_url":"https:\/\/dra.gov\/author\/ahazapier\/","title":"Biden-Harris Administration Announces Over $2.2 Million Investment into Missouri - Delta Regional Authority","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"J3Oavpzo5w\"><a href=\"https:\/\/dra.gov\/biden-harris-administration-announces-over-2-2-million-investment-into-missouri\/\">Biden-Harris Administration Announces Over $2.2 Million Investment into Missouri<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/dra.gov\/biden-harris-administration-announces-over-2-2-million-investment-into-missouri\/embed\/#?secret=J3Oavpzo5w\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Biden-Harris Administration Announces Over $2.2 Million Investment into Missouri” — Delta Regional Authority\" data-secret=\"J3Oavpzo5w\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"Biden-Harris Administration Announces Over $2.2 Million Investment into Southeast Missouri Communities","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/mcusercontent.com\/90665e275659657eb2097e76c\/images\/3c279e98-4eee-68aa-d6e2-455119b8e0a5.png"}
#### William H. WYATT, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ms. WALKER; Kamala B. Wilson, Individually and in their capacity as employees of Paul Bland; Paul Bland, Individually and in his capacity as an attorney, Defendants—Appellees.

No. 04-1116.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 27, 2004.

Decided: June 3, 2004.

*486William H. Wyatt, Jr., Appellant pro se.

Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

William H. Wyatt, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed.

Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “mandatory and jurisdictional.” *Browder v. Dir., Dep’t of Corr.,*434 U.S. 257, 264, 98 S.Ct. 556, 54 L.Ed.2d 521 (1978) (quoting *United States v. Robinson,*361 U.S. 220, 229, 80 S.Ct. 282, 4 L.Ed.2d 259 (I960)).

The district court’s order was entered on the docket on December 19, 2003. The notice of appeal was filed on January 21, 2004. Because Wyatt failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we deny Wyatt’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
§ 1202.2 What this part does not cover. This part does not cover: ( a ) Records that have been transferred into the National Archives of the United States for permanent preservation. Archival records that are contained in systems of records that become part of the National Archives of the United States are exempt from most provisions of the Privacy Act (see 5 U.S.C. 552a(l)(2) and (l)(3)). See subchapter C of this chapter for rules governing access to these type records.
( b ) Records of other agencies that are stored in NARA record centers on behalf of that agency are governed by the Privacy Act rules of the transferring agency. Send your request for those records directly to those agencies.
( c ) Personnel and medical records held by the National Personnel Records Center (NPRC) on behalf of the Department of Defense and the Office of Personnel Management. Privacy Act requests for these records should come to the NPRC.
#### § 10.1 Animals available.

From time to time there are surplus live elk, buffaloes and bears in Yellowstone National Park, and live buffaloes in Wind Cave National Park which the Secretary may, in his discretion, dispose of to Federal, State, county and municipal authorities for preserves, zoos, zoological gardens, and parks. When surplus live elk and buffaloes are available from these national parks, the Secretary may, in his discretion, dispose of these to individuals and private institutions.