alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Veterans Affairs

# AGENCY:

Department of Veterans Affairs.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

                        Under the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 4314(c) (4) agencies are required to publish a notice in the                         **Federal Register**                         of the appointment of Performance Review Board (PRB) members. This notice updates the VA Performance Review Board of the Department of Veterans Affairs that was published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on October 24, 2005 (Vol. 70, No. 204).                    

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         September 22, 2006.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Charlotte Moment, Office of Human Resources Management (052B), Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20420, (202) 273-8165.

## VA Performance Review Board (PRB)

R. Allen Pittman, Assistant Secretary for Human Resources and Administration (Chairperson)

Thomas G. Bowman, Chief of Staff

                        Sharon K. Barnes, Deputy Chief of Staff (Alternate)                              ( print page 55549)    

Ronald R. Aument, Deputy Under Secretary for Benefits, Veterans Benefits Administration

Michael Walcoff, Associate Deputy Under Secretary for Operations, Veterans Benefits Administration (Alternate)

Gerald M. Cross, M.D., Acting Deputy Under Secretary for Health, Veterans Health Administration

William F. Feeley, Assistant Deputy Under Secretary for Health for Operations and Management, Veterans Health Administration (Alternate)

Arthur S. Hamerschlag, Chief of Staff, Veterans Health Administration (Alternate)

John H. Thompson, Deputy General Counsel

Rita Reed, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Budget

Jon A. Wooditch, Deputy Inspector General

Robert T. Howard, Executive Director

Kenneth M. Greenberg, Executive Secretary to the Department

Richard Wannemacher, Jr., Senior Advisor, National Cemetery Administration

Dated: September 19, 2006.

R. James Nicholson,

Secretary of Veterans Affairs.

[FR Doc. 06-8106 Filed 9-21-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8320-01-P
# EUR-Lex - 12002E082 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 12002E082

**Treaty establishing the European Community (Nice consolidated version) - Part Three: Community policies - Title VI: Common rules on competition, taxation and approximation of laws - Chapter 1: Rules on competition - Section 1: Rules applying to undertakings - Article 82 - Article 86 - EC Treaty (Maastricht consolidated version) - Article 86 - EEC Treaty **

*
Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0065 - 0065 Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0209 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0029 - Consolidated version (EEC Treaty - no official publication available) *

Treaty establishing the European Community (Nice consolidated version)

Part Three: Community policies

Title VI: Common rules on competition, taxation and approximation of laws

Chapter 1: Rules on competition

Section 1: Rules applying to undertakings

Article 82

Article 86 - EC Treaty (Maastricht consolidated version)

Article 86 - EEC Treaty

Article 82

Any abuse by one or more undertakings of a dominant position within the common market or in a substantial part of it shall be prohibited as incompatible with the common market in so far as it may affect trade between Member States.

Such abuse may, in particular, consist in:

(a) directly or indirectly imposing unfair purchase or selling prices or other unfair trading conditions;

(b) limiting production, markets or technical development to the prejudice of consumers;

(c) applying dissimilar conditions to equivalent transactions with other trading parties, thereby placing them at a competitive disadvantage;

(d) making the conclusion of contracts subject to acceptance by the other parties of supplementary obligations which, by their nature or according to commercial usage, have no connection with the subject of such contracts.
###### Editorial Note on Part 300

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 300 appear at 64 FR 44431, Aug. 16, 1999, and at 76 FR 59305, Sept. 26, 2011.

#### § 300.96 Penalties.

Any treaty Indian who commits any act that is unlawful under this subpart normally will be referred to the applicable tribe for prosecution and punishment. If such tribe fails to prosecute such persons in a diligent manner for the offense(s) referred to the tribe, or if other good cause exists, such treaty Indian may be subject to the penalties and procedures described in the Magnuson-Stevens Act.
#### § 90.11 Statutory provisions.

Section 1 of the Act of July 3, 1956, as amended (70 Stat. 492; 7 U.S.C. 442-445) provides that the Commodity Credit Corporation shall make available to the Secretary of the Interior such wheat, corn, or other grains, acquired through price support operations and certified by the Corporation to be available for purposes of the Act or in such condition through spoilage or deterioration as not to be desirable for human consumption, as the Secretary shall requisition for the purpose of preventing crop damage by migratory waterfowl. Section 2 of the Act provides that, upon a finding that any area in the United States is threatened with damage to farmers' crops by migratory waterfowl, the Secretary is authorized and directed to requisition from the Commodity Credit Corporation and to make available to Federal, State, or local governmental bodies or officials, or to private organizations or persons, such grain acquired by the Corporation through price support operations in such quantities and subject to such regulations as the Secretary determines will most effectively lure migratory waterfowl away from crop depredations and at the same time not expose such migratory waterfowl to shooting over areas to which the waterfowl have been lured by such feeding programs.
SOUTHCOAST FINANCIAL CORPORATION

                                                                      Exhibit 32
                CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


The  undersigned,  who are the chief  executive  officer and the chief financial
officer of Southcoast Financial Corporation,  each hereby certifies that, to the
best of his  knowledge,  the  accompanying  Form  10-Q of the  registrant  fully
complies  with the  requirements  of  Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities
Exchange  Act of 1934,  and that  information  contained  in the  report  fairly
presents,  in all material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of
operations of the registrant.




Date:    November 6, 2008                                /s/ L. Wayne Pearson
         ----------------                                -----------------------
                                                         L. Wayne Pearson
                                                         Chief Executive Officer




                                                         /s/ William C. Heslop
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         William C. Heslop
                                                         Chief Financial Officer
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSE GUADALUPE MENDOZAMARIN,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 11-73747

Agency No. A077-056-703

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 12, 2013** 

Before: PREGERSON, REINHARDT, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

Jose Guadalupe Mendoza-Marin, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions

for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his

motion to reopen based on ineffective assistance of counsel. We have jurisdiction

FILED

APR 11 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to

reopen, and review de novo questions of law. Mohammed v. Gonzales, 400 F.3d

785, 791-92 (9th Cir. 2005). We deny the petition for review. 

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Mendoza-Marin’s motion to

reopen where he failed to establish prejudice arising from any alleged ineffective

assistance by his former attorneys. See id. at 793-94 (“[P]rejudice results when the

performance of counsel was so inadequate that it may have affected the outcome of

the proceedings.” (emphasis in original) (internal quotation marks omitted)). 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. 

2 11-73747
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA 

Present: Judges Alston, Chafin and Senior Judge Haley 

BABCOCK & WILCOX AND 

 INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY OF 

 NORTH AMERICA 

 MEMORANDUM OPINION*

v. Record No. 0378-15-3 PER CURIAM 

 JULY 14, 2015 

PAUL MORAN 

 FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION 

 (Scott C. Ford; McCandlish Holton, PC, on brief), for appellants. 

 (Robert E. Evans; Monica Taylor Monday; Gentry Locke Rakes & 

Moore, on brief), for appellee. 

 *

 Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication. 

 Babcock & Wilcox and Indemnity Insurance Company of America (collectively 

employer) appeal the decision by the Workers’ Compensation Commission (commission) 

awarding Paul Moran (claimant) medical benefits for a traumatic brain injury, temporary total 

disability benefits effective March 5, 2014, and wage loss benefits prior to April 21, 2014. 

Employer argues the commission erred in finding that (1) claimant suffered a causally-related 

brain injury; (2) the opinions of Drs. Joseph Conley, Gregory O’Shanick, and David Ross 

outweighed the contrary opinion of Dr. William Peck; (3) the treatment provided by Drs. Conley 

and O’Shanick was reasonable and necessary, causally-related, and authorized, and a proper 

referral of physicians was maintained; (4) claimant’s travel for treatment with Dr. O’Shanick was 

reasonable; (5) claimant was entitled to wage loss benefits prior to April 21, 2014 and in 

awarding payment of temporary total disability benefits effective March 5, 2014; and 

UNPUBLISHED 
- 2 - 

(6) claimant was totally disabled from employment after April 21, 2014 and in awarding ongoing 

temporary total disability benefits. We have reviewed the record and the commission’s opinion 

and find that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the 

commission in its opinion. See Moran v. Babcock & Wilcox, JCN VA00000558282 (Feb. 3, 

2015). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not 

aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27. 

Affirmed.
#### § 1195.1 Standards.

The standards for accessible medical diagnostic equipment are set forth in the appendix to this part. Other agencies, referred to as an enforcing authority in the standards, may adopt the standards as mandatory requirements for entities subject to their jurisdiction. Advisory sections and figures that illustrate the technical requirements in the appendix to part 1195 are available on the Internet at: *www.access-board.gov.* These advisory materials provide guidance only and do not contain mandatory requirements.
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

 36

 38

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

06/19

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 19 Jun 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.06 N 76.88 W Meters AGL
EXHIBIT 31.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 RULE 13a-14(a)

I, Michael L. Weiner, Chief Executive Officer of Biophan Technologies, Inc. (the
"registrant"), certify that:

1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Biophan Technologies,
Inc.;

2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4) The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5) The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.


Date: July 19, 2005

By: /s/ Michael L. Weiner
----------------------------------------
Name:   Michael L. Weiner,
Title:  Chief Executive Officer
#### § 635.16 [Reserved]
#### § 253.27 IFQ financing.

The Program may finance or refinance the project cost of purchasing, including the reimbursement of obligors for expenditures previously made for purchasing, individual fishing quotas in accordance with the applicable sections of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act or any other statute.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Biophan Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended May 31, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael
L. Weiner, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my
knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: July 15, 2005

By: /s/ Michael L. Weiner
----------------------------------------
Name:   Michael L. Weiner,
Title:  Chief Executive Officer
MisseSystemsP0 Box11337Tucson, Anzona85734.1337 USA520 (84 3000February 9, 2011To:U.S. Department of TransportationDocket Management System400 7th Street, SW.Room PL 401Washington, DC 20591-0001From:Raytheon Missile Systems/Advanced ProgramsGregg GeorgeChief Pilot and Senior Principal Systems EngineerP.O. Box 11337Bldg845,MS 5Tucson, AZ 85734-1337520-794-2777gregg georgeratheon. cornSubj:Request for exemption from §91.215 (a) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations.Ref:14CFR91Raytheon is requesting an exemption from the following regulation:§ 91.215 (a)ATC transponder and altitude reporting equipment and use.In part;(a)All airspace: U.S.-registered civil aircraft. For operations not conducted under part 121 or 135 of thischapter, ATC transponder equipment installed must meet the performance and enviromTnental requirementsof any class of TSO-C74b (Mode A) or any class of TSO-C74c (Mode A with altitude reporting capability)as appropriate, or the appropriate class of TSO-Cl 12 (Mode S).Raytheon requests exemption from the requirement to use a TSO certified transponder in its unmanned aircraftsystems. The current TSO certified transponder Raytheon uses is the Microair T2000SF. This transponder isnot controllable from the ground station while the aircraft is in flight. The Non-TSO version of this transponderis the Microair T2000UAV-S, which allows full control from the ground control station while the aircraft is inflight.We believe this is in the best interest of public safety in that we can utilize all the functions of thetransponder during flight.Missile Systems80 Bo 11337Tucson, Arizona85734 1337 USA5201943000The Microair T2000UAV-S was approved by the FAA for the first Special Airworthiness Certificate of theCobra Umnanned Aircraft System, and was changed to come into compliance with §91.215. Flight testing hasbeen previously completed for this configuration.SummaryRaytheon operates various Unmanned Aircraft Systems in the United States for missions related to research anddevelopment, crew training and market surveys. The new technologies developed to be used by the Departmentof Defense, and other public agencies will contribute to overall public safety.The operations are in the public interest because they will support military and public agencies in the war ontenor, homeland defense, border protection, law enforcement and disaster reliefRaytheon UAS operations will meet or exceed an equivalent level of safety because of the use of certifiedengineering processes and quality control in the design and manufacturing of the aircraft, and the use ofcertified pilots and engineers in the operations and maintenance of the UA systems.Gregg L. GeorgeSenior Principal Systems EngineerChief PilotSystems Test DirectorateFlight Test OperationsRaytheon Missile Systemscc:John E. CallowayManager, Flight Test OperationsRaytheon Missile Systems
# EUR-Lex - 12004V/AFI/DCL/02 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V/AFI/DCL/02

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - FINAL ACT - A.Declarations concerning provisions of the Constitution - 2.Declaration on Article I-9(2) **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0420 - 0420 *

2. Declaration on Article I-9(2)

The Conference agrees that the Union's accession to the European Convention on the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms should be arranged in such a way as to preserve the specific features of Union law. In this connection, the Conference notes the existence of a regular dialogue between the Court of Justice of the European Union and the European Court of Human Rights; such dialogue could be reinforced when the Union accedes to that Convention.

--------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Innovative  Software  Technologies,
Inc.  (the  "Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending June 30, 2003,  as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  I,  Linda W.  Kerecman,  Chief  Financial  Officer  of the  Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

     (1)  the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.



/s/ Linda W. Kerecman
----------------------------
Linda W.Kerecman
Chief Financial Officer
August 14, 2003
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5161 Received in Senate (RDS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5161

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            October 6 (legislative day, September 12), 1994

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 to permit the 
 prompt sharing of timber sale receipts of the Forest Service and the 
                       Bureau of Land Management.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TECHNICAL CORRECTION REGARDING SHARING OF TIMBER SALE 
              RECEIPTS.

    (a) Forest Service.--Section 13982(b)(1) of the Omnibus Budget 
Reconciliation Act of 1993 (Public Law 103-66; 107 Stat. 681; 16 U.S.C. 
500 note) is amended by inserting ``out of any money in the Treasury 
not otherwise appropriated,'' before ``for the benefit of counties''.
    (b) Bureau of Land Management.--Section 13983(b)(1) of the Omnibus 
Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 (Public Law 103-66; 107 Stat. 682; 43 
U.S.C. 1181f note) is amended by inserting ``, out of any money in the 
Treasury not otherwise appropriated,'' after ``shall make payments''.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 5, 1994.

            Attest:

                                           DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```