alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31
      CERTIFICATION

      I, Ronald D. Sloan, certify that:

1.    I  have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report  on  Form  10-QSB/A of Can-Cal
      Resources Ltd.;

2.    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain  any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the  statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made,  not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.    Based on  my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly  present  in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash  flows  of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.    I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures  (as  defined  in  Exchange  Act  Rules  13a-14  and 15d-14) for the
registrant and we have:

      a.    designed  such disclosure controls and procedures  to  ensure  that
            material information  relating  to  the  registrant,  including its
            consolidated  subsidiaries,  is  made known to us by others  within
            those  entities,  particularly during  the  period  in  which  this
            quarterly report is being prepared;

      b.    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
            and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date
            of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

      c.    presented  in  this quarterly  report  our  conclusions  about  the
            effectiveness of  the  disclosure  controls and procedures based on
            our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.    We  have  disclosed,  based  on  our  most  recent   evaluation,  to  the
registrant's auditors and board of directors:

      a.    all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
            controls which could adversely affect the registrant's  ability  to
            record,  process,  summarize  and  report  financial  data and have
            identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
            internal controls; and

      b.    any  fraud,  whether  or not material, that involves management  or
            other employees who have  a  significant  role  in the registrant's
            internal controls; and

6.    We  have  indicated  in this quarterly report whether or not  there  were
significant  changes in internal  controls  or  in  other  factors  that  could
significantly  affect  internal  controls  subsequent  to  the date of our most
recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard  to significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.

DATED this 22nd day of May, 2006.


					/s/  Ronald D. Sloan
					----------------------------------
					Ronald D. Sloan,
					President, Chief Executive Officer
                                           and Chief Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as                           ( print page 58421)                        amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.                

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institutes of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Initial Review Group, Neurological Sciences and Disorders K.                    

*Date:*                         October 19-20, 2006.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Embassy Suites Hotel Atlanta, 267 Marietta Street, Atlanta, GA 30303.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Katherine M. Woodbury, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Scientific Review Branch, NINDS/NIH/DHHS, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Blvd., Suite 3208, MSC 9529, Bethesda, MD 20892-9529. 301-496-9223.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.853, Clinical Research Related to Neurological Disorders; 93.854, Biological Basis Research in the Neurosciences, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: September 26, 2006.

Anna Snouffer,

Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 06-8449 Filed 10-2-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
'" i 

':"~ ": T/' I in'j . '_, :1jl '; 1\./11 

-- : . 

RESPONDED ON DECEMBER 1, 2009 11 :11 AM 

Bob Poole, Director of Transportation Studies, Reason Foundation 

What should Secretary LaHood's new aviation advisory committee focus on? Let me 

suggest five guiding principles. 

First, do no harm. By that I mean don't undercut or hobble the democratization of air 

travel ushered in by the Airline Deregulation Act of 1978. Even though adjusting to real 

competition has been difficult for most legacy carriers (and some new entrants), some 

airline business models are succeeding, even in today's recession. Passengers 

overwhelmingly prefer low fares to greater amenities, and we should respect their 

judgment. 

Second, implement further reforms of the air traffic control system, as recommended by 

both the Baliles and Mineta Commissions. Implementing the much-needed NextGen 

paradigm shift will remain high-risk, if the Air Traffic Organization remains embedded 

in a traditional federal bureaucracy subject to continual micromanagement and unable 

to tap the capital markets for large-scale investments. The Nav Canada example of userboard governance and a bondable user-charge funding system is the best model for what 

the ATO should become. 

Third, strengthen FAA safety regulation, in two ways. Get serious about applying a single 

safety standard to all scheduled air service. And put FAA safety regulation at arm's 

length from the provision of ATC services, by separating the ATO from the FAA. The 

latter is critically important to ensure public confidence in the major changes (e.g., 

automation, reduced separation standards) inherent in implementing NextGen. 

Fourth, get serious about "over-scheduling" at major congested airports, by 

implementing runway congestion pricing at such airports. Yes, NextGen and more 

concrete have roles to play, but ultimately when peak-period demand still far exceeds 

capacity, that limited capacity must be allocated somehow. The fairest way to do that is 

via market pricing. 

Fifth, let's implement truly open skies, by dropping the anachronistic protectionism that 

still treats airlines as different from other competitive industries. In other words, remove 

the restrictions on foreign ownership, so as to permit the emergence of truly global 
carriers with access to global capital markets. And yes, that will ultimately mean 

removing restrictions on cabotage.
#### § 162.165 Buffalo and Rochester Harbors, New York.

In Buffalo and Rochester Harbors, no vessel may exceed 6 miles per hour, except in the outer harbors where no vessel may exceed 10 miles per hour.

Note:

The Corps of Engineers also has regulations dealing with these areas in [33 CFR Part 207](/on/2024-09-23/title-33/part-207).

[CGD 79-151, [46 FR 7960](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/46-FR-7960), Jan. 26, 1981]
#### § 1002.37 Noncommercial soliciting.

Soliciting or demanding gifts, money, goods or services is prohibited, except pursuant to the terms and conditions of a permit that has been issued under § 1002.50, § 1002.51 or § 1002.52.
Case 16-30619 Doc 40 Filed 02/13/18 Entered 02/13/18 14:40:42 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 6
Case 16-30619 Doc 40 Filed 02/13/18 Entered 02/13/18 14:40:42 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 6
Case 16-30619 Doc 40 Filed 02/13/18 Entered 02/13/18 14:40:42 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 6
Case 16-30619 Doc 40 Filed 02/13/18 Entered 02/13/18 14:40:42 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 6
Case 16-30619 Doc 40 Filed 02/13/18 Entered 02/13/18 14:40:42 Desc Main

 Document Page 5 of 6
Case 16-30619 Doc 40 Filed 02/13/18 Entered 02/13/18 14:40:42 Desc Main

 Document Page 6 of 6
# EUR-Lex - 12006E240 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12006E240

**Treaty establishing the European Community (consolidated version) - Part Five - Institutions of the Community - TITLE I - Provisions governing the institutions - Chapter 1 - The institutions - Section 4 - The Court of Justice - Article 240 **

*
Official Journal C 321 E , 29/12/2006 P. 0149 - 0149 Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0129 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0275 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0063 - Consolidated version (EEC Treaty - no official publication available) *

Article 240

Save where jurisdiction is conferred on the Court of Justice by this Treaty, disputes to which the Community is a party shall not on that ground be excluded from the jurisdiction of the courts or tribunals of the Member States.

--------------------------------------------------
# EUR-Lex - 12005SA045 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12005SA045

**Act concerning the conditions of accession of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania and the adjustments to the Treaties on which the European Union is founded - PART FIVE:PROVISIONS RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THIS ACT - TITLE I:SETTING UP OF THE INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES - Article 45 **

*
Official Journal L 157 , 21/06/2005 P. 0218 - 0218 *

Article 45

A national of each new Member State shall be appointed to the Commission as from the date of accession. The new Members of the Commission shall be appointed by the Council, acting by qualified majority and by common accord with the President of the Commission, after consulting the European Parliament.

The terms of office of the Members thus appointed shall expire at the same time as those of the Members in office at the time of accession.

--------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 23.1 

 

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-113555) pertaining to the Staktek Holdings, Inc. 2003 Stock OptionPlan, Inc. of our report dated January 24, 2005, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Staktek Holdings, Inc.’s included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2004. 

 

/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP 

 

Austin, Texas 

March 7, 2005
EXHIBIT 32.2



                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Medical  Makeover  Corporation  of
America  (the  "Company")  on Form 10-Q for the quarter  ending June 30, 2005 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Periodic Report"), I, Stephen H Durland, Acting Chief Accounting Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18.U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1. The Periodic  Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.



 Date: August 16, 2005           /s/ Stephen H. Durland
                                -------------------------
                                Stephen H Durland
                                Acting Chief Accounting Officer








-------------------------------
This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and  shall not be deemed  filed by the  Company  for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section 906,  has been  provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its
staff upon request.
(Mark One)

[X]	Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of
1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2000



[ ]	Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the transition period from __________ to _____________.

Commission file number:	001-16063





NEVADA				98-0208667

(State or other jurisdiction of		(I.R.S. Employer Identification

incorporation)				Number)













Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.	Yes [X]	No [ ]

APPLICABLE ONLY TO ISSUERS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS
DURING THE PRECEDING FIVE YEARS

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be
filed by Sections 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the
distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court.		N/A



As of June 30, 2000, the Company had 3,042,000 shares issued and outstanding of its common
stock.

Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format (check one):	Yes [ ]	No [X]

**PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION**

**Item 1.  Financial Statements**

The information required by this Item is attached at Exhibit 99.15 hereto.

**Item 2.  Management's Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation.**

The information required by this Item is incorporated as part of the Company's financial
statements, attached as Exhibit 99.15 hereto.



In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be
signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

JUPITER ENTERPRISES, INC.

Date:     October 10, 2000

/s/ Tanis Cornwall

Tanis Cornwall, Secretary/Treasurer
#### § 665.121 Definitions.

As used in §§ 665.120 through 665.139, *American Samoa coral reef ecosystem component species (American Samoa coral reef ECS)* means those species identified as ECS in the American Samoa FEP and not defined as MUS or another ECS in this subpart.

[84 FR 2770, Feb. 8, 2019]
Editorial Note on Part 622
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 622 appear at 79 FR 57837, Sept. 26, 2014 and at 81 FR 32253, May 23, 2016.

§ 622.104 Restricted access zones. ( a ) *Establishment of restricted access zones.* NMFS will establish a restricted access zone for each aquaculture facility. The boundaries of the restricted access zone will correspond with the coordinates listed on the approved ACOE Section 10 permit associated with the aquaculture facility.
( b ) *Prohibited activities within a restricted access zone.* No recreational fishing or commercial fishing, other than aquaculture, may occur in the restricted access zone. No fishing vessel may operate in or transit through the restricted access zone unless the vessel has on board a copy of the aquaculture facility's permit with an original signature, *i.e.,* not a copy of the signature, of the permittee.
( c ) *Marking requirement.* The permittee must mark the restricted access zone with a floating device such as a buoy at each corner of the zone, as authorized by the USCG. Each floating device must clearly display the aquaculture facility's permit number and the words “RESTRICTED ACCESS” in block characters at least 6 inches (15.2 cm) in height and in a color that contrasts with the color of the floating device.
InThe Matter Of: FANNIE MAY Respondent 

## SERVED: March 11, 2016 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS WASHINGTON, DC ) ) ) ) ) Docket No. FAA-2015-3315 Case No. 2015-GL-70-0126

ORDERRESETTING THE RULE 16 LITIGATIONSCHEDULING CONFERENCE, AND RECONFIRMING THE DEADLINE FORTHE PARTIES TO CONFERAND FILE A RULE 26(t) PROPOSED DISCOVERY PLAN OnJanuary 6, 2016, an Order Setting a Rule 16 Litigation Scheduling Conference, and Directing the Parties to Confer and File a Rule 26(f) Proposed Discovery Plan was filed. Among other things, this Order set a March 15, 2016 deadline for the parties to file ajoint, proposed scheduling/discoveryplan, and set the Rule 16 Litigation Scheduling Conference for March 22, 2016. Due to anunavoidable conflict onthe Court's calendar, the Rule 16 Litigation Scheduling Conference must be reset. Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 13.205, and having reviewed the case file, all pleadings and motions, all relevant caselaw, statutes, regulations, rules, and authority, and being fully advised;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The Rule 16 Litigation Scheduling Conference set for Tuesday, March 22, 2016, at 1:30 p.m. Eastern time is reset to Wednesday, March 23,2016, at 1:30 p.m. Eastern time. To access the Court's conference line, the parties shall call202-493-2343. 2. The March 15, 2016 deadline for the parties to file ajoint, proposed scheduling/discovery plan is reconfirmed.3. Ifa party has anunavoidable conflict withthe resetRule 16 Litigation Scheduling Conference, and wishes to modify the date/time ofthe scheduled Conference, the party shallfirst conferwith opposing counsel about mutually agreeable alternate dates, andthen contact Mrs. Rachel Brown, Judicial StaffAssistant, atthe Office ofHearings (202-366-2132) as soon as possible afterthe receipt ofthis Order, with at leastthree (3) mutually-agreed, proposed alternate dates/times for the Judge's consideration.

Attachment: Service List

Page 2 of2

### DocketNo. FAA-2015-3315 (Civil Penalty Action) 

### SERVICE LIST-BYU.S. MAIL ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

### Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl0001



### Ms. Kate Barber Complainant's Counsel 

### Office ofthe ChiefCounsel Enforcement Division, Midwest Team 2300 East Devon Avenue Des Plaines, IL 60018-4696 TEL: 847-294-7862 FAJ(: 847-294-7498 

### Mr. Ron Ortcutt Respondent'sRepresentative ONE COPY



### Director ofWarehousing and Distribution Operations Fannie May Confections Brands, Inc. 1

793 Enterprise Parkway Twinsburg, OH 44087 TEL: 614-743-3592 Judge J.E. Sullivan U.S. Administrative LawJudge 

### Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-6941 FAJ(: 202-366-7536

1 Service was byU.S. Mail. For service in person orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
Exhibit 32.2

SATELLITE SECURITY CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Satellite
Security Corporation. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John L. Phillips, Principal Accounting
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                      |  |                        
|------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -------------------- |  | -----------------------
|                    |  |  | 
|Date: July 13, 2006 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ John L. Phillips
|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                      |  | John L. Phillips       
|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                      |  | Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-529

In Re: DAVID LEE CARR,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-97-680)

Submitted: May 14, 1998 Decided: June 2, 1998

Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David Lee Carr, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

David Lee Carr, a West Virginia inmate, filed a document entitled a "writ of mandamus or writ of prohibition, or interlocutory

appeal." He seeks a declaration from this court regarding, inter

alia, the constitutionality of certain federal statutes, the legality of common law liens in West Virginia, whether pro se inmates

are entitled to discovery, and whether the West Virginia Attorney

General can represent certain officials. Carr also seeks an order

permitting him to file and serve common law liens in West Virginia,

to disqualify the Attorney General as counsel in a civil case, and

to order discovery in a civil action Carr has filed. However, Carr

failed to establish that he has a clear right to the relief sought,

that the court has a clear duty to perform the act requested, and

that no other adequate remedy is available. See In re First Fed.

Sav. & Loan Ass'n, 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988). Furthermore,

Carr failed to establish that he is challenging an appealable

interlocutory or collateral order over which this court has jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1994). Accordingly, we deny Carr's

petition for a "writ of mandamus or prohibition or interlocutory

appeal." We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED