alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EUR-Lex - 12002E040 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 12002E040

**Treaty establishing the European Community (Nice consolidated version) - Part Three: Community policies - Title III: Free movement of persons, services and capital - Chapter 1: Workers - Article 40 - Article 49 - EC Treaty (Maastricht consolidated version) - Article 49 - EEC Treaty **

*
Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0051 - 0052 Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0194 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0021 - Consolidated version (EEC Treaty - no official publication available) *

Treaty establishing the European Community (Nice consolidated version)

Part Three: Community policies

Title III: Free movement of persons, services and capital

Chapter 1: Workers

Article 40

Article 49 - EC Treaty (Maastricht consolidated version)

Article 49 - EEC Treaty

Article 40

The Council shall, acting in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 251 and after consulting the Economic and Social Committee, issue directives or make regulations setting out the measures required to bring about freedom of movement for workers, as defined in Article 39, in particular:

(a) by ensuring close cooperation between national employment services;

(b) by abolishing those administrative procedures and practices and those qualifying periods in respect of eligibility for available employment, whether resulting from national legislation or from agreements previously concluded between Member States, the maintenance of which would form an obstacle to liberalisation of the movement of workers;

(c) by abolishing all such qualifying periods and other restrictions provided for either under national legislation or under agreements previously concluded between Member States as imposed on workers of other Member States conditions regarding the free choice of employment other than those imposed on workers of the State concerned;

(d) by setting up appropriate machinery to bring offers of employment into touch with applications for employment and to facilitate the achievement of a balance between supply and demand in the employment market in such a way as to avoid serious threats to the standard of living and level of employment in the various regions and industries.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

BILLY TYNER

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 18

- 2215

[ October 18, 2018 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Bernard I. Bober

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 10

- 434CF10A

.

Billy Tyner, Arcadia, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

G ROSS

, D AMOORGIAN and K LINGENSMITH

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Amendment No. 1 to Quarterly report of China Evergreen Environmental Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period
ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Chong Liang Pu and Peh Chung Lim, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                   |  |                                      
|------------------ |  | -------------------------------------
|September 25, 2006 |  | /s/ Chong Liang Pu                   
|                   |  | Chong Liang Pu,                      
|                   |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                   | 
|                   |  | /s/ Peh Chung Lim                    
|                   |  | Peh Chung Lim,                       
|                   |  | Chief Financial Officer
§ 1192.123 Restrooms. ( a ) If a restroom is provided for the general public, and an accessible restroom is required by § 1192.111 (a) and (e), it shall be designed so as to allow a person using a wheelchair or mobility aid to enter and use such restroom as specified in paragraphs (a) (1) through (5) of this section. ( 1 ) The minimum clear floor area shall be 35 inches by 60 inches. Permanently installed fixtures may overlap this area a maximum of 6 inches, if the lowest portion of the fixture is a minimum of 9 inches above the floor, and may overlap a maximum of 19 inches, if the lowest portion of the fixture is a minimum of 29 inches above the floor. Fixtures shall not interfere with access to and use of the water closet. Fold-down or retractable seats or shelves may overlap the clear floor space at a lower height provided they can be easily folded up or moved out of the way.
( 2 ) The height of the water closet shall be 17 inches to 19 inches measured to the top of the toilet seat. Seats shall not be sprung to return to a lifted position.
( 3 ) A grab bar at least 24 inches long shall be mounted behind the water closet, and a horizontal grab bar at least 40 inches long shall be mounted on at least one side wall, with one end not more than 12 inches from the back wall, at a height between 33 inches and 36 inches above the floor.
( 4 ) Faucets and flush controls shall be operable with one hand and shall not require tight grasping, pinching, or twisting of the wrist. The force required to activate controls shall be no greater than 5 lbf (22.2 N). Controls for flush valves shall be mounted no more than 44 inches above the floor.
( 5 ) Doorways on the end of the enclosure, opposite the water closet, shall have a minimum clear opening width of 32 inches. Doorways on the side wall shall have a minimum clear opening width of 39 inches. Door latches and hardware shall be operable with one hand and shall not require tight grasping, pinching, or twisting of the wrist.
( b ) Restrooms required to be accessible shall be in close proximity to at least one seating location for persons using mobility aids complying with § 1192.125(d) and shall be connected to such a space by an unobstructed path having a minimum width of 32 inches.
On petitioners’ motion for reconsideration filed November 8, 1993, reconsideration allowed; opinion (124 Or App 210, 859 P2d 1202) withdrawn;

reversed and remanded for reconsideration January 19, 1994

#### In the Matter of the Compensation of Kurt D. Cutlip, Claimant. CRAWFORD & COMPANY and Epson Portland, Inc., *Petitioners, v.*LIBERTY NORTHWEST INSURANCE CORPORATION, Oregon-Canadian Forest Products and Kurt D. Cutlip, *Respondents.*

(WCB 91-12437, 91-13835; CA A78445)

866 P2d 523

William H. Walters, and Miller, Nash, Wiener, Hager & Carlsen for motion.

No appearance *contra.*

Before Deits, Presiding Judge, and Riggs, Judge, and Durham, Judge pro tempore.

PER CURIAM

*111PER CURIAM

Petitioners move for reconsideration of our opinion, 124 Or App 210, 859 P2d 1202, affirming an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board on the basis of our holding in *SAIF v. Drews,*117 Or App 596, 845 P2d 215 (1993). *Drews*held that, in cases involving successive injuries, the employer with the last accepted claim need only prove that a new industrial injury involving the same condition materially contributed to claimant’s condition, in order to shift responsibility to a subsequent employer under ORS 656.308(1). However, the Supreme Court subsequently reversed our decision in *Drews*and held that the employer with the last accepted claim must prove that the new injury at a subsequent employer is the major contributing cause of the need for treatment in order to shift responsibility to the later employer. *SAIF v. Drews,*318 Or 1, 860 P2d 254 (1993). In view of the Supreme Court’s decision, we allow reconsideration, withdraw our opinion and reverse and remand to the Board for reconsideration under the proper standard.

Reconsideration allowed; opinion withdrawn; reversed and remanded for reconsideration.
HOLTZMANVQGELJQSEFIAK PLLC 

Auriini'vs ill iMtif 

45N'>Mihllill l.W« 

.Suiic 100 

IfiiC-WSS'OJ 

December 17, 2012 

o 

m 

i>o 

CD 

m 

c-j 

CO =i 

CD 

UD 

Jeff Jordan, Esq. 

Supervisory Attorney, Complaints Examination 

& Legal Administration 

Office of General Counsel 

Federal Election Commission 

999 E Street, NW 

Washington, DC 20463 

Re: MUR 6696 (Crossroads Grassroots Policy Strategies) 

Dear Mr. Jordan, 

On behalf of Crossroads GPS, Karl Rove, Haley Barbour, Steven Law, and Caleb 

Crosby, we respectfully request an extension of time to respond to. the Federal Election 

Commission's letter informing the organization that a complaint has been filed in the above 

referenced matter. Mr. Rove received the Commission's letter and accompanying materials on 

December 3,2012. Crossroads GPS received a copy of the complaint from the Commission, via 

its registered agent, on December 6,2012. 

We hereby request a thirty-day extension of time to respond, or until January 17,2013. 

This extension will permit us to complete our review of relevant responsive materials, and retain 

remaining statements and affidavits, so that we may respond in an appropriate manner. 

Accordingly, we respectfully request a thirty-day extension of time to respond to the complaint 

in this matter. 

Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any questions. 

Sincerely, 

o 

o.m 

O30:S3 

cor-*-; 

Thomas J. Josefiak 

Michael Bayes 

Counsel to Crossroads GPS
<TABLE> <S> <C>



        <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
BALANCE SHEET, THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS, AND THE STATEMENT OF CASH
FLOWS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                             192
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   192
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     192
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               30
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,360
<OTHER-SE>                                      (9,198)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       192
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  (23,838)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (50,838)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (23,838)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.00)



</TABLE>
Case 16-29527 Doc 1 Filed 09/16/16 Entered 09/16/16 10:31:34 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 9
Case 16-29527 Doc 1 Filed 09/16/16 Entered 09/16/16 10:31:34 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 9
Case 16-29527 Doc 1 Filed 09/16/16 Entered 09/16/16 10:31:34 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 9
Case 16-29527 Doc 1 Filed 09/16/16 Entered 09/16/16 10:31:34 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 9
Case 16-29527 Doc 1 Filed 09/16/16 Entered 09/16/16 10:31:34 Desc Main

 Document Page 5 of 9
Case 16-29527 Doc 1 Filed 09/16/16 Entered 09/16/16 10:31:34 Desc Main

 Document Page 6 of 9
Case 16-29527 Doc 1 Filed 09/16/16 Entered 09/16/16 10:31:34 Desc Main

 Document Page 7 of 9
Case 16-29527 Doc 1 Filed 09/16/16 Entered 09/16/16 10:31:34 Desc Main

 Document Page 8 of 9
Case 16-29527 Doc 1 Filed 09/16/16 Entered 09/16/16 10:31:34 Desc Main

 Document Page 9 of 9
MUR808200099
* Pursuant to 5 th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

1 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-20475

JERRY L. LANDERS, ET AL,

Plaintiffs,

L.B. FOSTER COMPANY,

Intervenor-Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

DAWSON CONSTRUCTION PLANT LIMITED,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

(C.A. No. H-99-2516)

February 12, 2001

Before WIENER, BARKSDALE, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

In this diversity product-liability case, IntervenorPlaintiff-Appellant L.B. Foster Company (“Foster”) appeals the

district court’s dismissal of its claims against Defendant-Appellee

Dawson Construction Plant Limited (“Dawson”) for lack of personal

jurisdiction. Foster contends that Dawson, although a British1 See Helicopteros Nacionales de Columbia S.A. v. Hall

, 466

U.S. 408, 413 (1984).

2 company with its principal place of business in the United Kingdom,

(1) purposefully established minimum contacts with Texas such that

the exercise of jurisdiction over Dawson comports with the due

process requirements of the Fourteenth Amendment, and that (2) the

exercise of such jurisdiction comports with traditional notions of

fair play and substantial justice. 1 Having carefully considered

the record, the arguments and briefs of counsel, and the opinion of

the district court, we are satisfied that the motion to dismiss for

lack of personal jurisdiction was properly granted, and accordingly

we affirm the judgment of the district court for essentially the

same reasons set forth in its well-reasoned opinion.

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000868373
<NAME> DIGITAL BIOMETRICS INC
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       1,891,397
<SECURITIES>                                   154,808
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,602,632
<ALLOWANCES>                                   441,276
<INVENTORY>                                  2,294,593
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,665,748
<PP&E>                                       2,027,737
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,113,185
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,699,238
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,533,990
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       123,610
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,041,638
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,699,238
<SALES>                                      9,712,259
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            11,419,358
<CGS>                                        6,614,314
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               10,340,389
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             7,277,254
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             230,347
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (6,275,394)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (6,275,394)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (6,275,394)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.53)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.53)
        


</TABLE>
## Faulk,Scott (OSn From: 

### Sent: To: 

### Subject: Joe Kaiama<joe.kaiama@gmail.com> Friday, October 2S, 2013 4:18 

## pM EAS(OST) Makani Kai I support Makani Kai in Kalaupapa I work and live in Kalaupapa and travel in and out of settlement, the fairs is reasonable 49.39 . Itravel on aweekly basis. Thank you CHK Extremes ~ Brn(808)

1
#### § 1206.3 What definitions apply to the regulations in Part 1206?

As used in Part 1206:

*Board* refers to a State historical records advisory board.

*Commission* (see NHPRC).

*Coordinator* means the coordinator of a State historical records advisory board.

*Cost sharing* means the financial contribution the applicant pledges toward the total cost of a project. Cost sharing can include both direct and indirect expenses, contributions provided by the applicant or by third parties as in-kind or cash contributions, and any income earned directly by the project. For a more detailed definition, see 2 CFR 306.

*Direct costs* means expenses that are attributable directly to the cost of a project, such as salaries, project supplies, travel expenses, equipment rented or purchased for the project, or services procured for the project.

*Grant opportunity announcement* refers to a document published on the NHPRC Web site and at *http://www.grants.gov* that describes a type of grant offered, eligibility requirements, and application instructions.

*Guidance* refers to a non-binding document published on the NHPRC Web site to clarify or explain Commission policy or to provide procedural details.

*Historical records* means documentary material having permanent or enduring value, including manuscripts, personal papers, official records, maps, audiovisual materials, and electronic files.

*Historical records repository* means organizations whose mission is to acquire, preserve, and promote the use of historical records. They include archives, special collections, museums, and historical societies.

*Indirect costs* means costs incurred for common or joint objectives of an applicant's organization and therefore not attributable to a specific project or activity. Typically, indirect costs include items such as overhead for facilities maintenance and accounting services. For a more detailed definition, see 2 CFR 306.

*NHPRC* means members of the National Historical Publications and Records Commission acting as a body.

*NHPRC staff* refers to the Executive Director and the staff of the Commission or the Executive Director of the Commission.

*State,* in §§ 1206.40 through 1206.42, means all 50 States of the Union, plus the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands. For a more detailed definition, see 2 CFR 306.

*The Manual of Suggested Practices* refers to “The Manual of Suggested Practices for State Historical Records Advisory Boards.” It is a type of guidance.

[75 FR 66317, Oct. 28, 2010, as amended at 79 FR 76080, Dec. 19, 2014]
### DESIGNATION OF AGENT FOR SERVICE OF NOTICE, PROCESS, ORDERS DECISIONS AND REQUIREMENTS ATTENTION DOCKET SECTION, C-55



### Asia Atlantic Airlines Co.. Ltd. , having its principal (Name of Company, please print) Office at 

### 246 Times Square Building. 11' h Floor, SukhumN it Road. Kiongtoey. Klongtoey, Bangkok 10110 Thailand

(address) Hereby designates, pursuant to section 46103 of Title 49 of the U.S. Code (formerly section 1005(b) of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958, as amended) the person named below as its Agent upon whom service of all notices processes and all orders, decision, and requirements of the Department of Transportation may be made for and on behalf of said can ier, hereby canceling all previous designations of agents made by it to the DOT. Name of Agent 

### Josh Romanow Address 

### Pillsbury Winthrop Sha«- Pittman LLP, 2300 N Street. NW. WashinQton, DC 20037 The Agent so designated has written his name and also his initials in the following space:

Nanie 

# ~ L (Initials)

~ IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Asia Atlantic Airlines Co.. Ltd. has caused these (Name of Company) presents to be signed in its name by AZA-t)V Z.. 4-f

- ^ Q 'y 'i

- = President (Please Print) of said company, and to be attested under its corporate seal by 

# PA /M O N (Secretary, or other Title) On this ~~ day of - 0 \ ~ -k Asia Atlantic Airlines Co. Ltd. (Name of Company)



# ~ ' ~

A 

# ," T 

# ~~ 

# .,,k*.% "I /1 1 0 4 ~ (Secretary, or other Title) By: ( , President)

OST F 1010.5 (1-98)
# EUR-Lex - 12007L005 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12007L005

**Treaty of Lisbon amending the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Community, signed at Lisbon, 13 December 2007 - FINAL PROVISIONS - Article 5 **

*
Official Journal 306 , 17/12/2007 P. 0134 - 0134 *

Article 5

1. The articles, sections, chapters, titles and parts of the Treaty on European Union and of the Treaty establishing the European Community, as amended by this Treaty, shall be renumbered in accordance with the tables of equivalences set out in the Annex to this Treaty, and which form an integral part of this Treaty.

2. The cross-references to the articles, sections, chapters, titles and parts of the Treaty on European Union and of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, as well as between them, shall be adapted pursuant to paragraph 1 and the references to paragraphs of the said articles as renumbered or re-ordered by the provisions of this Treaty shall be adapted in accordance with those provisions.

References to the articles, sections, chapters, titles and parts of the Treaty on European Union and of the Treaty establishing the European Community contained in the other treaties and acts of primary legislation on which the Union is founded shall be adapted pursuant to paragraph 1 of this Article. References to recitals of the Treaty on European Union or to paragraphs or articles of the Treaty on European Union or of the Treaty establishing the European Community as renumbered or re-arranged by the provisions of this Treaty shall be adapted pursuant to this latter.

Such adaptations shall, where necessary, also apply in the event that the provision in question has been repealed.

3. The references to the recitals, articles, sections, chapters, titles and parts of the Treaty on European Union and of the Treaty establishing the European Community, as amended by this Treaty, contained in other instruments or acts shall be understood as referring to the recitals, articles, sections, chapters, titles and parts of those Treaties as renumbered pursuant to paragraph 1 and, respectively, to the paragraphs of the said articles, as renumbered or re-arranged by certain provisions of this Treaty.

--------------------------------------------------