alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1


                          SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS

                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
                1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the Form 10-QSB of  Discovery  Investments  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Donald
Bell,  Chief Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that based on my knowledge:

     1. The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section  13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:  October 14, 2003


/s/ DONALD BELL
______________________________________
Donald Bell
President and sole Director




A SIGNED  ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN  STATEMENT  REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, OR OTHER
DOCUMENT AUTHENTICATING, ACKNOWLEDGING, OR OTHERWISE ADOPTING THE SIGNATURE THAT
APPEARS IN TYPED FORM WITHIN THE  ELECTRONIC  VERSION OF THIS WRITTEN  STATEMENT
REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, HAS BEEN  PROVIDED TO  DISCOVERY  INVESTMENTS  INC. AND
WILL BE RETAINED BY DISCOVERY  INVESTMENTS  INC. AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 5319 

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to direct the Under Secretary 

for Intelligence and Analysis of the Department of Homeland Security 

to conduct an annual audit of the information systems and bulk data 

of the Office of Intelligence and Analysis of the Department, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 14, 2024 

Mr. PETERS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to direct 

the Under Secretary for Intelligence and Analysis of 

the Department of Homeland Security to conduct an 

annual audit of the information systems and bulk data 

of the Office of Intelligence and Analysis of the Department, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘DHS Intelligence and 

5 Analysis Oversight and Transparency Act’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 5319 IS

1 SEC. 2. ANNUAL AUDIT OF DHS OFFICE OF INTELLIGENCE 

2 AND ANALYSIS INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND 

3 BULK DATA. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subtitle A of title II of the Home5 land Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 121 et seq.) is amend6 ed by adding at the end the following: 

7 ‘‘SEC. 210H. ANNUAL AUDIT OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS 

8 AND BULK DATA. 

9 ‘‘(a) DEFINITION.—In this section, the term ‘appro10 priate congressional committees’ means the Committee on 

11 Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs and the Se12 lect Committee on Intelligence of the Senate and the Com13 mittee on Homeland Security and the Permanent Select 

14 Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representa15 tives. 

16 ‘‘(b) AUDIT.—The Under Secretary for Intelligence 

17 and Analysis of the Department shall conduct an annual 

18 audit of the information systems and bulk data of the Of19 fice of Intelligence and Analysis, which shall be consistent 

20 with the intelligence oversight guidelines of the Office of 

21 Intelligence and Analysis. 

22 ‘‘(c) REPORT.—Not later than 30 days after the con23 clusion of the audit under subsection (b), the Under Sec24 retary for Intelligence and Analysis of the Department 

25 shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees 

26 the findings and results of such audit.’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 5319 IS

1 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents 

2 in section 1(b) of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 

3 (Public Law 107–296; 116 Stat. 2135) is amended by in4 serting after the item relating to section 210G the fol5 lowing: 

‘‘Sec. 210H. Annual audit of information systems and bulk data.’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           25187
<SECURITIES>                                      1924
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 31096
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  261096
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       1924350
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    261096
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   539
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    82094
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (81555)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (81555)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.04)


</TABLE>
§ 600.227 Lobbying. ( a ) Council members, employees and contractors must comply with the requirements of 31 U.S.C. 1352 and Department of Commerce implementing regulations published at 15 CFR part 28, “New Restrictions on Lobbying.” These provisions generally prohibit the use of Federal funds for lobbying the Executive or Legislative Branches of the Federal Government in connection with the award. Because the Councils receive in excess of $100,000 in Federal funding, the regulations mandate that the Councils must complete Form SF-LLL, “Disclosure of Lobbying Activities,” regarding the use of non Federal funds for lobbying. The Form SF-LLL shall be submitted within 30 days following the end of the calendar quarter in which there occurs any event that requires disclosure or that materially affects the accuracy of the information contained in any disclosure form previously filed. The recipient must submit the Forms SF-LLL, including those received from subrecipients, contractors, and subcontractors, to the Grants Officer.
( b ) Council members, employees, and contractors must comply with the Federal Cost Principles Applicable to Regional Fishery Management Council Grants and Cooperative Agreements summarized as follows: ( 1 ) Title 2 CFR part 230 - Cost Principles for Nonprofit Organizations (OMB CircularA-122) is applicable to the Federal assistance awards issued to the Councils.
( 2 ) The purpose of the cost principles at 2 CFR part 230 is to define what costs can be paid on Federal awards issued to non-profit organizations. The regulation establishes both general principles and detailed items of costs.
( 3 ) Under 2 CFR part 230, costs for certain lobbying activities are unallowable as charges to Federal awards. These activities would include any attempts to influence: ( i ) The introduction of Federal or state legislation;
( ii ) The enactment or modification of any pending legislation by preparing, distributing, or using publicity or propaganda, or by urging members of the general public to contribute to or to participate in any demonstration, march, rally, fundraising drive, lobbying campaign, or letter writing or telephone campaign.
( 4 ) Generally, costs associated with providing a technical and factual presentation directly related to the performance of a grant, through hearing testimony, statements, or letters to Congress or a state legislature are allowable if made in response to a documented request.
( 5 ) Costs associated with lobbying to influence state legislation in order to reduce the cost or to avoid material impairment of the organization's authority to perform the grant are also allowable.
[75 FR 59152, Sept. 27, 2010]
11. SCHEDULE OF COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

Formula:  Net Income/Weighted Average Shares Outstanding = Net
          Income per Common Share

Twelve-month period ended (without stock options):

March 31, 1996      $142,360 / 7,328,059 shares = $.02 Net Income
                    per Common Share.

March 31, 1997      $163,725 / 7,777,401 shares = $.02 Net Income
                    per Common Share.

March 31, 1998      $214,358 / 7,764,868 shares = $.03 Net Income
                    per Common Share

Calculation  of Earnings  Per Share for the Common  Stock  Equivalent  using the
Treasury Stock Method:

Market price per share at March 31, 1998 = $.30
Option price per share = $.25

Weighted  average  of shares  outstanding  using the  Treasury  Stock  Method of
calculating Earnings Per Share = 7,901,250

March 31, 1996 $142,360/7,328,059 shares = $.02 Net Income per Common Share

March 31, 1997 $163,725/7,777,401 shares = $.02 Net Income per Common Share

March 31, 1998 $214,358/7,901,250 shares = $.03 Net Income per Common Share
###### Editorial Note on Part 622

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 622 appear at 79 FR 57837, Sept. 26, 2014 and at 81 FR 32253, May 23, 2016.

#### § 622.479 Area and seasonal closures.

(a) *Closures applicable to specific areas* —

(1) *Mutton snapper spawning aggregation area.* The mutton snapper spawning aggregation area is bounded by rhumb lines connecting, in order, the points listed in Table 1 to this paragraph (a).

(i) From March 1 through June 30, each year, fishing is prohibited in those parts of the mutton snapper spawning aggregation area that are in the EEZ around St. Croix.

(ii) Fishing with pots, traps, bottom longlines, gillnets or trammel nets is prohibited year-round in those parts of the mutton snapper spawning aggregation area that are in the EEZ around St. Croix.

| Point | North lat. | West long. |
| --- | --- | --- |
| A | 17°37.8′ | 64°53.0′ |
| B | 17°39.0′ | 64°53.0′ |
| C | 17°39.0′ | 64°50.5′ |
| D | 17°38.1′ | 64°50.5′ |
| E | 17°37.8′ | 64°52.5′ |
| A | 17°37.8′ | 64°53.0′ |

Table 1 to § 622.479(a)—Mutton Snapper Spawning Aggregation Area

(2) *Red hind spawning aggregation area east of St. Croix.* The red hind spawning aggregation area east of St. Croix is bounded by rhumb lines connecting, in order, the points listed in Table 2 to this paragraph (a)(2).

(i) From December 1 through the last day of February, each year, fishing is prohibited in the red hind spawning aggregation area east of St. Croix.

(ii) Fishing with pots, traps, bottom longlines, gillnets or trammel nets is prohibited year-round in the red hind spawning aggregation area east of St. Croix.

| Point | North lat. | West long. |
| --- | --- | --- |
| A | 17°50.2′ | 64°27.9′ |
| B | 17°50.1′ | 64°26.1′ |
| C | 17°49.2′ | 64°25.8′ |
| D | 17°48.6′ | 64°25.8′ |
| E | 17°48.1′ | 64°26.1′ |
| F | 17°47.5′ | 64°26.9′ |
| A | 17°50.2′ | 64°27.9′ |

Table 2 to § 622.479(a)(2)—Red Hind Spawning Aggregation Area East of St. Croix

(b) *Seasonal closures applicable to specific species* —

(1) *Black, red, tiger, and yellowfin grouper closure.* From February 1 through April 30, each year, no person may fish for or possess black, red, tiger, or yellowfin grouper in or from the EEZ around St. Croix. The prohibition on possession does not apply to such grouper harvested and landed ashore prior to the closure.

(2) *Black, blackfin, silk, and vermilion snapper closure.* From October 1 through December 31, each year, no person may fish for or possess black, blackfin, silk, or vermilion snapper in or from the EEZ around St. Croix. The prohibition on possession does not apply to such snapper harvested and landed ashore prior to the closure.

(3) *Lane and mutton snapper closure.* From April 1 through June 30, each year, no person may fish for or possess lane or mutton snapper in or from the EEZ around St. Croix. The prohibition on possession does not apply to such snapper harvested and landed ashore prior to the closure.

(4) *Queen conch.* No person may fish for or possess a queen conch in or from the EEZ around St. Croix, except from November 1 through May 31 in the area east of 64°34′ W longitude, which includes Lang Bank.
# t r 7

# ~ 

# I t [

# ~ I 

# l 

# I ! 

# I 

# l 14. National Academy of Seiences and Rational Academy of Enginee:-ing. "Acidity, Alkalinity, and pH." Water Quality Criteria. EPA Rl-73-033. March, 1973.



# c ..a.

I 

## 0 01



# ..... I 

# I
[Civ. No. 1335.

Third Appellate District.

May 5, 1915.]

#### O. F. WESTPHAL, Appellant, v. H. C. FINKLER et al., Respondents.

Water-eights—Action to Determine.'—In this action to determine certain water-rights, the judgment is affirmed upon the authority of the decision in *Robertson*v. *Finlcler, ante,*p. 322.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Mateo County. George H. Buck, Judge.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

Carroll Cook, and William Hoff Cook, for Appellant.

Ross & Ross, for Respondents.

CHIPMAN, P. J.

By stipulation this case was heard and decided in the lower court upon the evidence submitted in *Robertson*v. *Finkler.*The questions involved in *Robertson*v. *Finkler*(Civ. No. 1334), *ante,*p. 322, [149 Pac. 784] this day decided, are identical with the questions raised in this ease and our decision in that case is determinative of this case Westphal’s interest in Rock Spring was one-sixth and is not disputed. He claimed, however, as did Robertson, that the water developed above the spring was part of the water of the spring. He failed, as did Robertson, in establishing his contention.

Upon the authority of the decision in *Robertson*v. *Finkler,*the judgment is affirmed.

Hart, J., and Burnett, J., concurred.

A petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on July 2, 1915.
\\DC - 036787/000001 - 3387433 v1

March 30, 2012

Hogan Lovells US LLP

Columbia Square

555 Thirteenth Street, N.W.

Washington, DC 20004

+1.202.637.5600 Tel

+1.202.637.5910 Fax

Robert E. Cohn

Partner

202.637.4999 Direct Line

Robert.cohn@hoganlovells.com

Honorable Susan Kurland

Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs

U.S. Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Slot Exemption Proceeding to Allocate Two Within-Perimeter Slot

Exemptions at Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport, Docket

OST-2000-7182;

Objection of Frontier Airlines, Inc. to Motion for Leave to File a

Consolidated Reply of Southwest Airlines Co.

Dear Assistant Secretary Kurland:

Frontier Airlines hereby opposes Southwest’s Motion for Leave to File a Consolidated

Reply. Southwest’s 22-page pleading is hardly, as it claims, “narrowly tailored”. It is an

unauthorized document and violates the procedural schedule established by the

Department in the Notice instituting this proceeding, which provided for applications and

comments. See, Notice served February 17, 2012 in Docket OST-2000-7182.

Southwest’s unauthorized pleading is an improper attempt to get the last word and its

motion for leave to file should be denied. Frontier will not dignify Southwest’s

submission by a substantive response other than to state that its claims as to Frontier

are without merit.

The Department has before it a complete record and Frontier urges that the Department

proceed expeditiously to issue a decision granting the two slot exemptions to Frontier

for DCA-Louisville service.

Respectfully submitted,

_____________________

Robert E. Cohn

Patrick R. Rizzi

Counsel for Frontier Airlines, Inc.

cc: Service List
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1

                           CROSS TIMBERS OIL COMPANY
               COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

                                 (in thousands)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                           YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                             ----------------------------------------------
                                              1996      1995      1994      1993     1992
                                             -------  ---------  -------  --------  -------
<S>                                          <C>      <C>        <C>      <C>       <C>
 
Earnings (loss) available to common stock..  $19,790  $(10,538)  $ 3,048  $(4,012)  $ 4,744
Income Tax Expense.........................   10,669    (5,825)    1,730    3,643       154
Interest and Debt Expense..................   17,224    12,922     8,289    5,612     5,273
Interest Portion of Rentals (a)............    1,830       637       519      463       504
Preferred stock dividends..................      514         -         -        -         -
                                             -------  --------   -------  -------   -------
Earnings (loss) before Provision for
  Taxes and Fixed Charges..................  $50,027  $ (2,804)  $13,586  $ 5,706   $10,675
                                             =======  ========   =======  =======   =======

Interest and Debt Expense..................  $17,224  $ 12,922   $ 8,289  $ 5,612   $ 5,273
Interest Portion of Rentals (a)............    1,830       637       519      463       504
Preferred stock dividends..................      514         -         -        -         -
                                             -------  --------   -------  -------   -------

Total Fixed Charges........................  $19,568  $ 13,559   $ 8,808  $ 6,075   $ 5,777
                                             =======  ========   =======  =======   =======
 
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges.........      2.6      (0.2)(b)   1.5      0.9       1.8

Excess of Fixed Charges over Earnings (Loss) $     -  $(16,363)(b)     -  $  (369)        -
</TABLE>

(a) Calculated as one-third of rentals.
(b) Negative ratio is the result of a $20,280,000 pre-tax, non-cash charge
    recorded upon adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.
    121, Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of.
    Excluding the effect of this charge, the ratio of earnings to fixed charges
    is 1.3.
EXHIBIT 32.2



                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Medical Makeover  Corporation of
America (the  "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending  September 30, 2006
as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the
"Periodic  Report"),  I, ,  Acting  Chief  Accounting  Officer  of the  Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18.U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1. The Periodic  Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.



    /s/  Robert Rudman
----------------------------------
    Chief Financial Officer
    November 14, 2006

--------------------------
This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and  shall not be deemed  filed by the  Company  for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section 906,  has been  provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its
staff upon request.
Exhibit 32

Certificate Pursuant to

             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
             as Adopted Pursuant to
        Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NetWolves Corporation (the "Company")
on Form  10-QSB  for the  quarter  ending  March  31,  2005 as  filed  with  the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Walter
M.  Groteke,  President,  Chief  Executive  Officer  and  Chairman of the Board,
certify,  pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  906  of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date: May 16, 2005

                                               /s/ Walter M. Groteke
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Walter M. Groteke
                                               Chairman of the Board, President
                                               and Chief Executive Officer





 Certificate Pursuant to

              18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
              as Adopted Pursuant to
        Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NetWolves Corporation (the "Company")
on Form  10-QSB  for the  quarter  ending  March  31,  2005 as  filed  with  the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Peter
C. Castle, Secretary and Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date: May 16, 2005
                                               /s/ Peter C. Castle
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Peter C. Castle
                                               Secretary and Treasurer
                                               Chief Financial Officer and
                                               Chief Accounting Officer