alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1220.30 What are an agency's records management responsibilities? ( a ) Under 44 U.S.C. 3101, the head of each Federal agency must make and preserve records containing adequate and proper documentation of the organization, functions, policies, decisions, procedures, and essential transactions of the agency. These records must be designed to furnish the information necessary to protect the legal and financial rights of the Government and of persons directly affected by the agency's activities.
( b ) Under 44 U.S.C. 3102, the head of each Federal agency must establish and maintain an active, continuing program for the economical and efficient management of the records of the agency.
( c ) Agency records management programs must provide for: ( 1 ) Effective controls over the creation, maintenance, and use of records in the conduct of current business; and
( 2 ) Cooperation with the Archivist and the Administrator of GSA in applying standards, procedures, and techniques designed to improve the management of records, promote the maintenance and security of records deemed appropriate for preservation, and facilitate the segregation and destruction of records of temporary value.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsDevelopment of a High Performance Acousto-ultrasonic Scan SystemAcousto-ultrasonic (AU) interrogation is a single-sided nondestructive evaluation (NDE) technique employing separated sending and receiving transducers. It is used for assessing the microstructural condition/distributed damage state of the material between the transducers. AU is complementary to more traditional NDE methods such as ultrasonic c-scan, x-ray radiography, and thermographic inspection that tend to be used primarily for discrete flaw detection. Through its history, AU has been used to inspect polymer matrix composite, metal matrix composite, ceramic matrix composite, and even monolithic metallic materials. The development of a high-performance automated AU scan system for characterizing within-sample microstructural and property homogeneity is currently in a prototype stage at NASA. In this paper, a review of essential AU technology is given. Additionally, the basic hardware and software configuration, and preliminary results with the system, are described.Document ID20020090895Acquisition SourceGlenn Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsRoth, D. J.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Martin, R. E.*(Cleveland State Univ. Cleveland, OH United States)*Harmon, L. M.*(Cleveland State Univ. Cleveland, OH United States)*Gyekenyesi, A. L.*(Ohio Aerospace Inst. Brook Park, OH United States)*Kautz, H. E.*(Cleveland State Univ. Cleveland, OH United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 7, 2013Publication DateOctober 1, 2002Subject CategoryQuality Assurance And ReliabilityReport/Patent NumberE-13606NAS 1.15:211913NASA/TM-2002-211913Meeting InformationMeeting: 29th Annual Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation (QNDE)Location: Bellingham, WACountry: United StatesStart Date: July 14, 2002End Date: July 19, 2002Sponsors:Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation ProgramsFunding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 714-04-30Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20020090895.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
§ 1200.16 Will I be penalized for misusing the official seals and logos? ( a ) *Seals.* ( 1 ) If you falsely make, forge, counterfeit, mutilate, or alter official seals, replicas, reproductions or embossing seals, or knowingly use or possess with fraudulent intent any altered seal, you are subject to penalties under 18 U.S.C. 506.
( 2 ) If you use the official seals, replicas, reproductions, or embossing seals in a manner inconsistent with the provisions of this part, you are subject to penalties under 18 U.S.C. 1017 and to other provisions of law as applicable.
( b ) *Logos.* If you use the official logos, replicas or reproductions, of logos in a manner inconsistent with the provisions of this part, you are subject to penalties under 18 U.S.C. 701.
[69 FR 26051, May 11, 2004]
#### § 151.1512 Implementation schedule for approved ballast water management methods.

(a) To discharge ballast water into the waters of the United States, the master, owner, operator, agent, or person in charge of a vessel subject to [§ 151.1510 of this subpart](/on/2024-09-23/title-33/part-151/section-151.1510) must either ensure that the ballast water meets the ballast water discharge standard as defined in [§ 151.1511(a)](/on/2024-09-23/title-33/section-151.1511#p-151.1511(a)), use an AMS as provided for under [§ 151.1510(a)(1)](/on/2024-09-23/title-33/section-151.1510#p-151.1510(a)(1)) or ballast exclusively with water from a U.S. public water system, as described in [§ 151.1510(a)(4)](/on/2024-09-23/title-33/section-151.1510#p-151.1510(a)(4)), according to the schedule in [paragraph (b)](/on/2024-09-23/title-33/section-151.1512#p-151.1512(b)) of this section.

(b) *Implementation Schedule for the Ballast Water Management Discharge Standard for vessels using a Coast Guard approved BWMS to manage ballast water discharged to waters of the United States.* After the dates listed in Table [151.1512(b)](/on/2024-09-23/title-33/section-151.1512#p-151.1512(b)), vessels may use a USCG-approved BWMS and comply with the discharge standard, or employ an approved ballast water management method per [§ 151.1510(a)(1)](/on/2024-09-23/title-33/section-151.1510#p-151.1510(a)(1)) and [(4)](/on/2024-09-23/title-33/section-151.1510#p-151.1510(a)(4)).

Table [151.1512](/on/2024-09-23/title-33/section-151.1512)(b)—Implementation Schedule for Ballast Water Management Discharge Standards for Vessels Using Coast Guard Approved Ballast Water Management Systems

| | Vessel's ballast water capacity | Date constructed | Vessel's compliance date |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| New vessels | All | On or after December 1, 2013 | On delivery. |
| Existing vessels | Less than 1500 m3 | Before December 1, 2013 | First scheduled drydocking after January 1, 2016. |
| | 1500-5000 m3 | Before December 1, 2013 | First scheduled drydocking after January 1, 2014. |
| | Greater than 5000 m3 | Before December 1, 2013 | First scheduled drydocking after January 1, 2016. |

[USCG-2001-10486, [77 FR 17305](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/77-FR-17305), Mar. 23, 2012, as amended by USCG-2015-0433, [80 FR 44281](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/80-FR-44281), July 27, 2015]
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 01236

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

01236\01236_Certification Statement.pdf Plant certification statement

x 01236\01236_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

01236\01236_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

01236\01236_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 01236\01236_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 01236\01236_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 01236\01236_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 01236\01236_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 01236\01236_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 01236\Follow up\01236_Follow up-Response.pdf Draft Questions for Follow Up

x 01236\Follow up\AEP ML Updated Part C Table C-23 U1.xls Draft Questions for Follow Up

x 01236\Follow up\AEP ML Updated Part C Table C-23 U2.xls Draft Questions for Follow Up

x 01236\Follow up\AEP ML Updated Part D Table D-13.xls Draft Questions for Follow Up

x 01236\Follow up\AEP ML WWT-1 updated.ppt Draft Questions for Follow Up

x 01236\Follow up\EPA ML ICR review ques.doc Draft Questions for Follow Up

x 01236\Follow up\EPA_Mitchell_FollowUp.pdf Draft Questions for Follow Up

01236\Supporting Documentation\01236_AEP ELGs ICR submittal letter 10-13-10.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

01236\Supporting Documentation\AEP ML 01236 A5-2 Aerial MAP-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

01236\Supporting Documentation\AEP ML 01236 A5-2 Aerial MAP-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 01236\Supporting Documentation\AEP ML 01236 A5-3 Water Balance WB-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

01236\Supporting Documentation\AEP ML 01236 D2-3 EPA Mitchell SER - Appendices.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

01236\Supporting Documentation\AEP ML 01236 D2-3 EPA Mitchell SER final report.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 01236\Supporting Documentation\AEP ML 01236 D2-3 FGD Trmt Option Eval CBI.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 01236\Supporting Documentation\AEP ML 01236 D2-4 CH2MHill Treatability Study Attachment CBI.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 01236\Supporting Documentation\AEP ML 01236 D3-1 Diagram D-1(POND-1).pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 01236\Supporting Documentation\AEP ML 01236 D3-1 Diagram D-1(POND-2).pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 01236\Supporting Documentation\AEP ML 01236 D3-1 Diagram WWT-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 01236\Supporting Documentation\AEP ML 01236 D5-10 Bid Proposal Exhibit B1 Attachment CBI.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 01236\Supporting Documentation\AEP ML 01236 D5-10 Bid Proposal Exhibit B2 Attachment CBI.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
EXHIBIT 31.2: Rule 13a-14(a) Certifications



I, Ding Rencai, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report
on Form 10-Q of China Water Group, Inc. (the “Registrant”);



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does
not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial
statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The Registrant’s other certifying
officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Registrant and have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s
internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The issuer’s other certifying officers
and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s
auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) All significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the Registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that
involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the smaller reporting Registrant’s internal controls
over financial reporting.



|Date: July 24, 2012 | /s/ Ding Rencai                      | 
|------------------- | ------------------------------------ | 
|                    | Ding Rencai, Chief Executive Officer
#### § 1208.101 Purpose.

The purpose of this regulation is to effectuate section 119 of the Rehabilitation, Comprehensive Services, and Developmental Disabilities Amendments of 1978, which amended section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 to prohibit discrimination on the basis of handicap in programs or activities conducted by Executive agencies or the United States Postal Service.
§ 1192.63 Between-car barriers. ( a ) *Requirement.* Suitable devices or systems shall be provided to prevent, deter or warn individuals from inadvertently stepping off the platform between cars. Acceptable solutions include, but are not limited to, pantograph gates, chains, motion detectors or similar devices.
( b ) *Exception.* Between-car barriers are not required where platform screens are provided which close off the platform edge and open only when trains are correctly aligned with the doors.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration 

# AGENCY:

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, DOT. 

# Time and Date:

October 11, 2006, 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. 

# Place:

Holiday Inn Capitol, 550 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20024. 

# Status:

 Open to the public. 

# Matters to be Considered:

An overview of the Unified Carrier Registration Plan and Agreement requirements set forth under section 4305 of the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users, and the administrative functioning of the Board. In addition, the Board will continue its work in developing the Unified Carrier Registration Agreement procedures and toward recommending UCRA fees to the Secretary. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. Shannon L. Watson, (202) 366-0702, Office of Safety Programs, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, or Mr. Bryan Price, (412) 395-4816, FMCSA Pennsylvania Division Office. 

Dated: October 2, 2006. 

John H. Hill, 

Administrator. 

[FR Doc. 06-8514 Filed 10-2-06; 2:13 pm] 

BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P
§ 1256.20 May I obtain access to Federal archival records? ( a ) Most Federal archival records are open for research without submitting a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request. Part 1254 specifies procedures for using unrestricted records in a NARA research room, submitting reference requests, and ordering copies of records.
( b ) Some records are subject to restrictions prescribed by statute, Executive Order, or by restrictions specified in writing in accordance with 44 U.S.C. 2108 by the agency that transferred the records to the National Archives of the United States. All agency-specified restrictions must comply with the FOIA. Even if the records are not national-security classified, we must screen some records for other information exempt from release under the FOIA.
§ 260.98 Premises. The premises about an official establishment shall be free from conditions which may result in the contamination of food including, but not limited to, the following: ( a ) Strong offensive odors;
( b ) Improperly stored equipment, litter, waste, refuse, and uncut weeds or grass within the immediate vicinity of the buildings or structures that may constitute an attractant, breeding place, or harborage for rodents, insects, and other pests;
( c ) Excessively dusty roads, yards, or parking lots that may constitute a source of contamination in areas where food is exposed;
( d ) Inadequately drained areas that may contribute contamination to food products through seepage or foot-borne filth and by providing a breeding place for insects or micro-organisms;
If the grounds of an official establishment are bordered by grounds not under the official establishment operator's control of the kind described in paragraphs (b) through (d) of this section, care must be exercised in the official establishment by inspection, extermination, or other means to effect exclusion of pests, dirt, and other filth that may be a source of food contamination. [36 FR 21040, Nov. 3, 1971]
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20463 

BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

In the Matter of ) 

 ) 

Debbie Wasserman Schultz for Congress and ) 

 Lawrence Wasserman in his official capacity as ) MUR 7125 

 Treasurer ) 

Debbie Wasserman Schultz ) 

Democratic National Committee and Andrew ) 

 Tobias in his official capacity as treasurer, et al. ) 

STATEMENT OF REASONS OF COMMISSIONER ELLEN L. WEINTRAUB

The allegations in this matter are based entirely on emails released by Wikileaks 

following the hacking of the DNC during the 2016 elections. The U.S. Intelligence Community 

and Department of Justice have deemed this foreign-state-sponsored hacking operation to be an 

attack on the American democratic process.

1

The basis of this Complaint, then, poses a concern far more grave than its allegations. 

The Commission should not consider enforcement actions against U.S. citizens based on 

information derived from illegal foreign interference in our elections. Full stop. This agency 

should not allow its enforcement docket to be dictated by whom the Russians choose to hack. To 

treat this like an ordinary complaint, airing and analyzing all the facts and legal issues raised, is 

to allow this agency to be used as a pawn in a nefarious game that I have no intention of 

playing.2

 

1

 Office of the Dir. of Nat’l Intelligence, Intelligence Community Assessment: Assessing Russian Activities 

and Intentions in Recent US Elections, at 1 (Jan. 6, 2017); Special Counsel Robert S. Mueller, III, U.S. Dep’t of 

Justice, Report on the Investigation into Russian Interference in the 2016 Presidential Election at 3, 13 (Mar. 22, 

2019) (vol. 1).

2

 A complaint fueled solely by the results of a foreign entity’s attack on our elections, as seen here, is in a

class by itself. It can be distinguished from complaints based on leaks or information from whistleblowers. One can 

debate the merits of such unauthorized information releases, but they do not represent the same sort of threat to our 

system as do foreign attacks on our democracy. And when a complaint is based only partly on information from a 

foreign hack, the complaint’s legitimate wheat can – and should – be separated from the hacked chaff and only the

former pursued. See Statement of Reasons of Chair Ellen L. Weintraub at 6, n.30, MUR 6940, et al. (Correct the

Record, et al.)

MUR712500214
MUR 7125 (Debbie Wasserman Schultz, et al.) 

Statement of Reasons

Page 2 of 2 

This was no ordinary complaint. I based my vote to dismiss it entirely on the illicit

provenance of its information. 

August 27, 2021 Ellen L. Weintraub

 Commissioner 

MUR712500215
# EUR-Lex - 11957A077 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11957A077

**TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN ATOMIC ENERGY COMMUNITY ( E.A.E.C. - EURATOM ), TITLE TWO - PROVISIONS FOR THE ENCOURAGEMENT OF PROGRESS IN THE FIELD OF NUCLEAR ENERGY, CHAPTER VII: SAFEGUARDS, ARTICLE 77 **

*

*

++++

ARTICLE 77

IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THIS CHAPTER , THE COMMISSION SHALL SATISFY ITSELF THAT , IN THE TERRITORIES OF MEMBER STATES ,

( A ) ORES , SOURCE MATERIALS AND SPECIAL FISSILE MATERIALS ARE NOT DIVERTED FROM THEIR INTENDED USES AS DECLARED BY THE USERS ;

( B ) THE PROVISIONS RELATING TO SUPPLY AND ANY PARTICULAR SAFEGUARDING OBLIGATIONS ASSUMED BY THE COMMUNITY UNDER AN AGREEMENT CONCLUDED WITH A THIRD STATE OR AN INTERNATIONAL ORGANISATION ARE COMPLIED WITH .
§ 1254.104 How does NARA determine fees to prepare documents for microfilming? ( a ) As part of our evaluation of a request to microfilm documents, we determine the amount of microfilm preparation that we must do before you can microfilm the documents and the estimated cost of such preparation. We base fees for microfilm preparation on direct salary costs (including benefits) and supply costs when we perform the work. When a NARA contractor performs the work, the fees are the cost to NARA. Microfilm preparation includes: ( 1 ) Removing document fasteners from documents when the fasteners can be removed without damage to the documents; and
( 2 ) Taking any document conservation actions that must be accomplished in order to film the documents, such as document flattening or mending.
( b ) We provide you detailed information on the fees for microfilm preparation in the letter of approval. You must pay fees in accordance with § 1258.14 of this chapter. When a body of documents requires extensive microfilm preparation, we may establish a different payment schedule at our discretion.