alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
124 STAT. 3062 PUBLIC LAW 111–289—NOV. 30, 2010 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S.J. Res. 40: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 156 (2010): 

Nov. 15, considered and passed Senate. 

Nov. 17, considered and passed House. 

Æ 

Public Law 111–289 

111th Congress 

Joint Resolution 

Appointing the day for the convening of the first session of the One Hundred 

Twelfth Congress. 

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the

United States of America in Congress assembled, That the first 

regular session of the One Hundred Twelfth Congress shall begin 

at noon on Wednesday, January 5, 2011. 

Approved November 30, 2010. 

Nov. 30, 2010 

[S.J. Res. 40] 


dkrause on GSDDPC29PROD with PUBLIC LAWS
# EUR-Lex - 12004V265 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V265

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART III — THE POLICIES AND FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - TITLE III — INTERNAL POLICIES AND ACTION - CHAPTER IV — AREA OF FREEDOM, SECURITY AND JUSTICE - Section 2 — Policies on border checks, asylum and immigration - Article III-265 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0114 - 0115 *

Article III-265

1. The Union shall develop a policy with a view to:

(a) ensuring the absence of any controls on persons, whatever their nationality, when crossing internal borders;

(b) carrying out checks on persons and efficient monitoring of the crossing of external borders;

(c) the gradual introduction of an integrated management system for external borders.

2. For the purposes of paragraph 1, European laws or framework laws shall establish measures concerning:

(a) the common policy on visas and other short-stay residence permits;

(b) the checks to which persons crossing external borders are subject;

(c) the conditions under which nationals of third countries shall have the freedom to travel within the Union for a short period;

(d) any measure necessary for the gradual establishment of an integrated management system for external borders;

(e) the absence of any controls on persons, whatever their nationality, when crossing internal borders.

3. This Article shall not affect the competence of the Member States concerning the geographical demarcation of their borders, in accordance with international law.

--------------------------------------------------
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 536 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 536

 To authorize the confiscation of assets of the Russian Federation and 
    the use of such assets to offset costs to the United States of 
                         assistance to Ukraine.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 27, 2023

Mr. Daines (for himself and Mr. Cramer) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, 
                           and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To authorize the confiscation of assets of the Russian Federation and 
    the use of such assets to offset costs to the United States of 
                         assistance to Ukraine.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONFISCATION OF ASSETS OF RUSSIAN FEDERATION; USE TO OFFSET 
              COSTS TO UNITED STATES OF AID TO UKRAINE.

    (a) In General.--The President shall--
            (1) confiscate, through instructions or licenses or in such 
        other manner as the President determines appropriate, funds of 
        the Government of the Russian Federation that are subject to 
        the jurisdiction of the United States; and
            (2) deposit funds confiscated under paragraph (1) in the 
        general fund of the Treasury to offset the costs of amounts 
        appropriated by any Act making emergency supplemental 
        appropriations for assistance for the situation in Ukraine for 
        the fiscal year ending September 30, 2023.
    (b) Vesting.--All right, title, and interest in funds confiscated 
under subsection (a) shall vest in the Government of the United States.
                                 <all>
```
Case 16-82037 Doc 2 Filed 08/30/16 Entered 08/30/16 14:02:39 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2
Case 16-82037 Doc 2 Filed 08/30/16 Entered 08/30/16 14:02:39 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2
# EUR-Lex - 12006E/APP/03 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12006E/APP/03

**Amendments to Primary Legislation further to the Accession of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania to the European Union - III. Protocol on the statute of the Court of Justice **

*
Official Journal C 321 E , 29/12/2006 P. 0329 - 0329 *

AMENDMENTS TO PRIMARY LEGISLATION FURTHER TO THE ACCESSION OF THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA AND ROMANIA TO THE EUROPEAN UNION

Further to the entry in force of the Treaty concerning the accession of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania to the European Union, the following articles shall be amended as set out below.

III. PROTOCOL ON THE STATUTE OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE

1. The first paragraph of Article 9 shall be replaced by the following:

"When, every three years, the Judges are partially replaced, fourteen and thirteen Judges shall be replaced alternately."

2. Article 48 shall be replaced by the following:

"The Court of First Instance shall consist of twenty-seven Judges."

--------------------------------------------------
###### Editorial Note on Part 866

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 866 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

#### § 866.3180 xxx

###### Cross Reference

Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 77450, Sept. 23, 2024.
# EUR-Lex - 12006E030 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12006E030

**Treaty establishing the European Community (consolidated version) - Part Three - Community policies - TITLE I - Free movement of goods - Chapter 2 - Prohibition of quantitative restrictions between Member States - Article 30 **

*
Official Journal C 321 E , 29/12/2006 P. 0053 - 0053 Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0047 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0189 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0016 - Consolidated version (EEC Treaty - no official publication available) *

Article 30

The provisions of Articles 28 and 29 shall not preclude prohibitions or restrictions on imports, exports or goods in transit justified on grounds of public morality, public policy or public security; the protection of health and life of humans, animals or plants; the protection of national treasures possessing artistic, historic or archaeological value; or the protection of industrial and commercial property. Such prohibitions or restrictions shall not, however, constitute a means of arbitrary discrimination or a disguised restriction on trade between Member States.

--------------------------------------------------
### From: Tom Smitherman tom@smithermanrealty.com 

### Subject: 333 Petition Date: January 14, 2016 at 5:26PM 

# •

To: Docket Operations M-30; U. S. Department of Transportation 1200 New JerseyAvenue SE. Room W12·140 West Building Ground Floor Wahington DC 20590


### From: Tom Smitherman <tom@smithermanrealty.com> 

### Subject: 

### 333 exemption for Phantom Drone Standard Date: January 14,2016 at 5:16:54 PM EST 

### To: 333exemptions@taa 

### Cc: Tom Smitherman <tsmitherman@yadtel.net>

To: FAA From: Thomas D Smitherman Subject: Request for 333 Exemption Operators Name and Address: Thomas D Smitherman 1000 Bruce Road East Bend,**N~** C. 27018 Request relief**fro~** 14 CFR 11.81 Safety: Thomas D. Smitherman will bethe Drone operator and comply with all government regulations and assure drone iswell maintained and operated per manufactures guidance. I (Thomas D. Smitherman) will not infringe upon other persons ortheir property. I will also assure that noflight will be made beyond my eye sight and no altitude above 400feet. I will stay aware ofall weather conditions and notfly at anytime other than when Ican keep TOTAL control ofthe Drone.

Public Interest: I am a real estate broker who markets mainly large land tracts and commercial properties and occasionallysome residential. The Drone videos enable an insight into any structure, environmental, topographical, vegetation and infrastructure chararisticsthat can be very useful in planning the best use of said property. Whlle reviewing large tracts oflandfor farming use, we evaluate soil conditions, water run off, streams, tract geometry, and forestation. In my effortto serve the best interestof a seller or buyer, the Drone isvery beneficial by providing datathat cannot be provided withoutthe aerial video.The Drone videos truly helps me provide "full disclosure during anytransaction." Proposed Operation: I (Thomas D. Smitherman) plan to provide video of real estate properties which I havefor sale tothe general public. Ido not intendto provide Drone services to others, onlyfor use in my activities. Make and Model of Aircraft: DJI

- Phantom 3 Standard Please advise if I need tofurnish more information. E-Mail: tsmitherman@yadtel.net Phone: Off-336-961-3351 Cell-336-406-7243 

# f2_F6

# JS/5fl.~
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 32.1

                           PERSISTENCE SOFTWARE, INC.

                            CERTIFICATION PRUSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Persistence Software, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Christopher T. Keene, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.



/s/ CHRISTOPHER T. KEENE
------------------------
Christopher T. Keene
Chief Executive Officer
October 7, 2003
# EUR-Lex - 12005SP058 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12005SP058

**Protocol concerning the conditions and arrangements for admission of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania to the European Union - PART FIVE:PROVISIONS RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THIS PROTOCOL - TITLE II:APPLICABILITY OF THE ACTS OF THE INSTITUTIONS - Article 58 **

*
Official Journal L 157 , 21/06/2005 P. 0044 - 0044 *

Article 58

The texts of the acts of the institutions adopted before accession and drawn up by the Council, the Commission or the European Central Bank in the Bulgarian and Romanian languages shall, from the date of accession, be authentic under the same conditions as the texts drawn up in the present official languages. They shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union if the texts in the present languages were so published.

--------------------------------------------------
# EUR-Lex - 12004V114 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V114

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART II — THE CHARTER OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THE UNION - TITLE VII — GENERAL PROVISIONS GOVERNING THE INTERPRETATION AND APPLICATION OF THE CHARTER - Article II-114 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0054 - 0054 *

Article II-114

Prohibition of abuse of rights

Nothing in this Charter shall be interpreted as implying any right to engage in any activity or to perform any act aimed at the destruction of any of the rights and freedoms recognised in this Charter or at their limitation to a greater extent than is provided for herein.

--------------------------------------------------
NO. 07-11-0479-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL C DECEMBER 12, 2011

__________________ ____________ MICHAEL PINA MONTION, APPELLANT
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

__________________ _______________ FROM THE 64 TH DISTRICT COURT OF HALE COUNTY; NO. A18655-1012; HONORABLE WALLY HATCH, JUDGE

__________________ _____________ Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION
Following a conviction for burglary of a habitation, 1 on March 3, 2011, Appellant, Michael Pina Montion, was sentenced to six years confinement, suspended in favor of community supervision, and assessed a $1,000 fine. The State filed a motion to revoke community supervision for violations of t he terms and conditions thereof. On October

1 Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 30.02(a) (West 2011).2 24, 2011, following a hearing, the trial cour t granted the State's motion, revoked Appellant's community supervision and imposed t he original sentence. Appellant filed a notice of appeal on November 30, 2011. We dismiss for want of jurisdiction.
A timely and proper notice of appeal invokes this Court = s jurisdiction. State v. Riewe , 13 S.W.3d 408, 410 (Tex.Crim.App. 2000). When no motion for new trial is filed, a notice of appeal must be filed within thirty days after the day sentence is imposed. Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1 ). The deadline may be extended if, within fifteen days, the party files the notice wit h the trial court clerk and files in this Court a motion for extension of time in compli ance with Rule 10.5(b) of th e Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. 2 See Tex. R. App. P. 26.3. (Emphasis added). This Court has no authority to invoke Rule 2 of the Texa s Rules of Appellate Procedure to enlarge the time in which to file the notice of appeal or the motion fo r extension of time. Tex. R. A pp. P. 2; Slaton v. State , 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex.Crim.App. 1998).
The judgment reflects that Appellant's sentence was imposed on October 24, 2011. Because no motion for new trial was f iled, Appellant's notic e of appeal was due to be filed with the trial cour t clerk on or before November 23, 2011. Notwithstanding that the notice of appeal was filed in the trial court on November 30, 2011, within the fifteen day period provided by Rule 26.3, no moti on for extension of time was timely filed in this Court. Consequently, this Court is wit hout authority to extend the time to file the

2 Unlike in civil cases, the motion for extension of ti me reasonably explaining the delay cannot be implied. Cf. Verburgt v. Dorner , 959 S.W.2d 615, 616-17 (Tex. 1997).3 notice of appeal and t he untimely notice of appeal prevents this Court from exercising jurisdiction over this case. 3
Accordingly, this appeal is dism issed for want of jurisdiction.

Patrick A. Pirtle Justice

3 Appellant may be entitled to relief by way of an out- of-time appeal by filing a post-conviction writ of habeas corpus returnable to the Texas Court of Crimi nal Appeals. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07 (West Supp. 2011).
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**
MEMORANDUM OPINION
N o. 04

- 19

- 00420

- CV

Steven ROBLES , Appellant

v. Sally ALBA , et al., Appellee s From the 365th Judicial District Court , Maverick County, Texas Trial Court No. 090324241MCVAJA Honorable Amado J. Abascal, III , Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Delivered and Filed: July 10, 2019
DISMISSED This is an attempted appeal from a final order in a suit affecting the parent

- child relationship , dated August 10, 2009. Appellant filed a “Motion for Leave to File Late Notice of Appeal” on June 20, 2019. Absent a timely filed notice of appeal from a final judgment or appealable interlocutory order, we do not have jurisdiction over an appeal. See Leh mann v. Har

- Con Corp. , 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). A notice of appeal must be filed within thirty days after the judgment or other appealable order is signed if no deadline

- extending post

- judgment motions have been filed. See04

- 19

- 00420

- CV

- 2

- T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 26.1. A mo tion for extension of time is necessarily implied when an appellant, acting in good faith, files a notice of appeal beyond the time allowed by Rule 26.1 but within the fifteen

- day grace period provided by Rule 26.3 for filing a motion for extension of time

. Verburgt
v. Dorner , 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997) (construing the predecessor to Rule 26 )

. “Once the period for granting a motion for extension of time under [Rule 26.3] has passed, a party can no longer invoke an appellate court’s jurisdiction.” Id

. H ere, appellant did not file a notice of appeal within the time allowed by Rule 26.1, nor did he file a notice of appeal or motion for extension of time to file a notice of appeal within the fifteen

- day grace period provided by Rule 26.3. Accordingly, this appeal and appellant’s motion for leave are dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
PER CURIAM
# EUR-Lex - 12006E252 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12006E252

**Treaty establishing the European Community (consolidated version) - Part Five - Institutions of the Community - TITLE I - Provisions governing the institutions - Chapter 2 - Provisions common to several institutions - Article 252 **

*
Official Journal C 321 E , 29/12/2006 P. 0155 - 0156 Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0134 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0280 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0066 - Consolidated version *

Article 252

Where reference is made in this Treaty to this Article for the adoption of an act, the following procedure shall apply.

(a) The Council, acting by a qualified majority on a proposal from the Commission and after obtaining the opinion of the European Parliament, shall adopt a common position.

(b) The Council's common position shall be communicated to the European Parliament. The Council and the Commission shall inform the European Parliament fully of the reasons which led the Council to adopt its common position and also of the Commission's position.

If, within three months of such communication, the European Parliament approves this common position or has not taken a decision within that period, the Council shall definitively adopt the act in question in accordance with the common position.

(c) The European Parliament may, within the period of three months referred to in point (b), by an absolute majority of its component Members, propose amendments to the Council's common position. The European Parliament may also, by the same majority, reject the Council's common position. The result of the proceedings shall be transmitted to the Council and the Commission.

If the European Parliament has rejected the Council's common position, unanimity shall be required for the Council to act on a second reading.

(d) The Commission shall, within a period of one month, re-examine the proposal on the basis of which the Council adopted its common position, by taking into account the amendments proposed by the European Parliament.

The Commission shall forward to the Council, at the same time as its re-examined proposal, the amendments of the European Parliament which it has not accepted, and shall express its opinion on them. The Council may adopt these amendments unanimously.

(e) The Council, acting by a qualified majority, shall adopt the proposal as re-examined by the Commission.

Unanimity shall be required for the Council to amend the proposal as re-examined by the Commission.

(f) In the cases referred to in points (c), (d) and (e), the Council shall be required to act within a period of three months. If no decision is taken within this period, the Commission proposal shall be deemed not to have been adopted.

(g) The periods referred to in points (b) and (f) may be extended by a maximum of one month by common accord between the Council and the European Parliament.

--------------------------------------------------
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>		5

<S>					<C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>			12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>			MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>			APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>			MAR-31-1999
<CASH>				175,256
<SECURITIES>			0
<RECEIVABLES>			937,479
<ALLOWANCES>			0
<INVENTORY>				0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>			1,450,286
<PP&E>				1,160,430
<DEPRECIATION>			(348,734)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>			2,509,239
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>		408,712
<BONDS>				0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY> 		0
<PREFERRED>				0
<COMMON>				555,177
<OTHER-SE>				1,545,350
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>	2,509,239
<SALES>				3,072,236
<TOTAL-REVENUES>			3,072,236
<CGS>					0
<TOTAL-COSTS>			0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>			2,432,984
<LOSS-PROVISION>			0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE		0
<INCOME-PRETAX>			639,252
<INCOME-TAX>			260,294
<INCOME-CONTINUING>		378,958
<DISCONTINUED>			0
<EXTRAORDINARY>			0
<CHANGES>				0
<NET-INCOME>			378,958
<EPS-BASIC>			.49
<EPS-DILUTED>			.49
BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

In the Matter of ) 

Care in Action, Inc., et al. – 

Recommendation to Rescind Reason to 

Believe Findings, Close the File, and 

Approve Appropriate Letters 

(Memorandum from Chairman Sean J. 

Cooksey) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

MUR 7537 

AMENDED CERTIFICATION 

I, Vicktoria J. Allen, Deputy Secretary of the Federal Election 

Commission, do hereby certify that on February 02, 2024, the Commission 

decided by a vote of 6-0 to rescind the Commission’s September 30, 2021 

reason to believe findings, close the file, and approve the appropriate letters, as 

recommended in the Memorandum from Chairman Sean J. Cooksey dated 

January 31, 2024. 

Commissioners Broussard, Cooksey, Dickerson, Lindenbaum, Trainor, and 

Weintraub voted affirmatively for the decision. 

 Attest: 

 February 6, 2024 

 

Date Vicktoria J. Allen 

 Deputy Secretary of the Commission 

Vicktoria J 

Allen

Digitally signed by 

Vicktoria J Allen 

Date: 2024.02.06 18:04:58 

-05'00'

MUR753700155
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





SECTION
      906 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
      OF VOCALSCAPE NETWORKS, INC.





In
      connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Vocalscape
      Networks, Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, the undersigned, Ron
      McIntyre, President and principal financial officer of Vocalscape Networks,
      Inc., does hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      such
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
      the
      information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter
      ended March 31, 2007 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of Vocalscape Networks,
      Inc.


Date:
              May 15, 2007
            By:
            /s/ Ron
              McIntyreRon
              McIntyrePresident
              and
              principal financial officer