alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

In re: ) Case No. 

)

) Chapter 13 

)

SSN: XXX-XX- Debtors )

To:

ORDER TO EMPLOYER TO PAY THE TRUSTEE 

Attn: Payroll Department 

WHEREAS, the above named debtor has a plan to pay his/her debts out of his/her future earnings,

and by his/her plan submits all of his/her future earnings to the supervision and control of this Court for the

purpose of carrying out the Plan:

NOW IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, that until further order of this Court, , employer of , deduct from the earnings of the debtor the sum of $

each month beginning on the next pay day following the receipt of this order and to pay the sum so deducted to ,

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the employer shall stop or change the deduction upon written notice from the

Trustee;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the employer shall notify the Trustee if the employment of the debtor is

terminated and the reason for such termination; 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that all earnings of the debtor, except amounts required to be withheld by the

provisions of Federal or State law or for insurance, pension or union dues, be paid to the debtor and that no

deduction other than authorized or directed by this order be made by the employer. 

Date 

Entered: 

Jeffrey Allsteadt, Clerk, United States Bankruptcy Court 

Attorney Signature ______________________ Date:

Check this box if the debtor has agreed to the entry of this order without further notice or hearing through Section 

I of the Chapter 13 Plan.

 Yashica L Spellman 16-27238

9272

AMENDED

City of Chicago

121 N Clark

Chicago, Il 60602

City of Chicago

 Yashica L Spellman 2,130.00

08/24/2018

Case 16-27238 Doc 54 Filed 08/24/18 Entered 08/24/18 12:39:38 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
Case 16-28716 Doc 4 Filed 09/08/16 Entered 09/08/16 10:21:01 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2
Case 16-28716 Doc 4 Filed 09/08/16 Entered 09/08/16 10:21:01 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2
Memo to: EPA Docket (EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0218)

Subject: Meeting on Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for “National Emission Standards for 

Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPs)-Radon from Operating Uranium Mill Tailings”, 

Subpart W of 40 CFR Part 61 

On September 4, 2014, EPA staff members met with members of the public in the EPA Region 8 offices 

in Denver, Colorado, to discuss the proposed rulemaking “National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air

Pollutants (NESHAPs)-Radon from Operating Uranium Mill Tailings”, Subpart W of 40 CFR Part 61. The 

following persons participated in the meeting: 

Members of the Public: 

Sharyn Cunningham, Colorado Citizens Against Toxic Waste, Inc. 

Kay Hawklee, representing self 

Travis Stills, Energy Materials Law Center, attorney representing Colorado Citizens Against Toxic 

Waste, Inc. 

EPA: 

Jon Edwards, Director, EPA Radiation Protection Division (by telephone) 

Alan Perrin, Deputy Director, EPA Radiation Protection Division (by telephone) 

Anthony Nesky, Center for Radiation Information and Outreach, EPA Radiation Protection 

Division 

Tom Peake, Director, Center for Waste Management and Regulations, EPA Radiation Protection 

Division 

Dan Schultheisz, Associate Director, Center for Waste Management and Regulations, EPA 

Radiation Protection Division 

In the meeting, members of the public discussed their concerns about the proposed rule revising 

Subpart W and the environmental impacts of uranium tailings. Much of the discussion pertained to the 

Cotter uranium mill in Canon City, Colorado. Other topics of discussion included the 1994 rescission of 

the NESHAPs for uranium mill tailings in Subpart T, the operational period in which Subpart W is 

applicable, and the desire for confirmed radon monitoring. The members of the public also reviewed 

previous interactions with EPA.
Carroll,

No. 4898.

#### Mary G. Pollini *v.*Raymond F. Pollini.

Argued January 3, 1961.

Deeide'd February 7, 1961.

*Broderick, Manning Sullivan (Mr. Broderick*orally), for the plaintiff.

*Lawrence J. Walsh*(by brief and orally), for the defendant.

Kenison, C. J.

No question is raised as to the pleadings or that part of the decree that relates to custody and support. *Baker*v. *Baker,*90 N. H. 307; Grimes, Pitfalls in Domestic Relations Proceedings, 1 N. H. Bar J. (No. 4) 15, 19 (1959). The question presented as stated in the defendant’s brief is as follows: “In a matter of domestic strife, wherein the testimony appears undisputed *184(1) that each party has suffered treatment so as to seriously injure health, (2) that two admittedly qualified marriage counselors prior to the initiation of any legal proceedings advised the parties to separate, (3) that separations have not resulted in any lasting reconciliation, (4) that physical assaults have marred the domestic scene, and (5) that the parties concede that reconciliation is futile, whether a legal separation is a solution preferable to that of an absolute divorce.”

The defendant contends that the Court failed “to look at the total situation” *(Powell*v. *Powell,*97 N. H. 301, 303) in denying the divorce with the result that the parties are half-married and half-free — one a wife without a husband and the other a husband without a wife. Keezer, Marriage and Divorce (3d *ed.*and 1959 Cumulative Supplement) *s.*244. *Coleman*v. *Coleman,*(Ky. App.) 269 S. W. 2d 730. See *Ouellette*v. *Ouellette,*100 N. H. 434, 436. A partial answer to this contention, however, is that divorces are decreed to “the innocent party” (RSA 458:7) and the evidence failed to convince the Trial Court that the defendant had met this requirement. *Franklyn*v. *Franklyn,*93 N. H. 90; *Ballou*v. *Ballou,*95 N. H. 105; *Morgan*v. *Morgan,*101 N. H. 470. The determination of who qualifies as the “innocent party” is a difficult task. “In domestic relation cases testimony of the parties may be unconsciously colored by emotion and consciously slanted by vindictiveness. To distinguish fact from assertion frequently requires the delphic powers of a judicial Solomon and the attainment of that objective should not be unduly diluted in the process of appellate review.” *Ballou*v. *Ballou,*95 N. H. 105. The one-hundred-per-cent innocent one may be of a rare breed *(Kibbee*v. *Kibbee,*99 N. H. 215, 216) but the Trial Court does its best which sometimes demands a saline evaluation of the total testimony when the domestic relations proceeding is uncontested or contested only in theory.

It may well be argued that in the present case an absolute divorce (RSA 458:7) would be a preferable solution rather than a decree for separate maintenance (RSA 458:31) or a legal separation (RSA 458:26) but the wife did not seek this solution and the evidence did not compel the Trial Court to grant it. *Alford*v. *Alford,*(Ky. App.) 317 S. W. 2d 887. See *Wilmot*v. *Wilmot,*94 N. H. 483; *Desaulnier*v. *Desaulnier,*97 N. H. 171.

*Exception overruled.*

All concurred.
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y A lton Thomas Davis,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk November 22, 2010

1115 

# Order

November 22, 2010

141251

PINE BLUFFS AREA PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 141251 COA: 289200 Roscommon CC: 06-725893-CH DeWITT LANDING AND DOCK ASSOCIATION, KENNETH SHINSKY, and ERIC WEGNER, Defendants, Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellees, and

VICTOR TEICHMAN, LEE TEICHMAN, and ANDREW TEICHMAN, Defendants-Appellees,
and

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, Defendant,

v

ROSCOMMON COUNTY ROAD COMMISSION, Third-Party Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 1, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

TODD BUCHANAN, 

Appellant, 

v.

Case No. 5D22-1428

LT Case No. 2009-CF-013383-A-O 

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

 Appellee. 

_____________________________/ 

Decision filed November 15, 2022 

3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court

for Orange County, 

Wayne C. Wooten, Judge. 

Todd Buchanan, Orlando, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

COHEN, NARDELLA and WOZNIAK, JJ., concur.
§ 1225.18 How do agencies request records disposition authority? ( a ) Federal agencies submit an SF 115 to NARA to request authority to schedule (establish the disposition for) permanent and temporary records, either on a recurring or one-time basis.
( b ) SF 115s include only records not covered by the General Records Schedules (GRS) (see part 1227 of this subchapter), deviations from the GRS (see § 1227.12 of this subchapter), or previously scheduled records requiring changes in retention periods or substantive changes in description.
( c ) SF 115s do not include nonrecord material. The disposition of nonrecord materials is determined by agencies and does not require NARA approval.
( d ) The following elements are required on a SF 115: ( 1 ) Title and description of the records covered by each item.
( 2 ) Disposition instructions that can be readily applied. Records schedules must provide for: ( i ) The destruction of records that no longer have sufficient value to justify further retention (see § 1224.10(b) of this subchapter); and
( ii ) The identification of potentially permanent records and provisions for their transfer to the legal custody of NARA.
( 3 ) Certification that the records proposed for disposition are not now needed for the business of the agency or will not be needed after the specified retention periods. The signature of the authorized agency representative on the SF 115 provides certification.
( e ) NARA will return SF 115s that are improperly prepared. The agency must make the necessary corrections and resubmit the form to NARA.
# EUR-Lex - 12002E263 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 12002E263

**Treaty establishing the European Community (Nice consolidated version) - Part Five: Institutions of the Community - Title I: Provisions governing the institutions - Chapter 4: The Committee of the Regions - Article 263 - Article 198a - EC Treaty (Maastricht consolidated version) - **

*
Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0138 - 0138 Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0284 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0069 - Consolidated version *

Treaty establishing the European Community (Nice consolidated version)

Part Five: Institutions of the Community

Title I: Provisions governing the institutions

Chapter 4: The Committee of the Regions

Article 263

Article 198a - EC Treaty (Maastricht consolidated version)

Article 263

A committee, hereinafter referred to as "the Committee of the Regions", consisting of representatives of regional and local bodies who either hold a regional or local authority electoral mandate or are politically accountable to an elected assembly, is hereby established with advisory status.

The number of members of the Committee of the Regions shall not exceed 350.

The number of members of the Committee shall be as follows:

>TABLE>.

The members of the Committee and an equal number of alternate members shall be appointed for four years, on proposals from the respective Member States. Their term of office shall be renewable. The Council, acting by a qualified majority, shall adopt the list of members and alternate members drawn up in accordance with the proposals made by each Member State. When the mandate referred to in the first paragraph on the basis of which they were proposed comes to an end, the term of office of members of the Committee shall terminate automatically and they shall then be replaced for the remainder of the said term of office in accordance with the same procedure. No member of the Committee shall at the same time be a Member of the European Parliament.

The members of the Committee may not be bound by any mandatory instructions. They shall be completely independent in the performance of their duties, in the general interest of the Community.
Vulcan Construction Materials

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 4, 2015

No. 04-15-00117-CV

RHINO CONTRACTORS, LLC,

Appellant

v.

VULCAN CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS, LP,

Appellee

From the 288th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014-CI-15870

Honorable David A. Canales, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellant Rhino Contractors, LLC, has filed a notice stating that it is in bankruptcy. The 

notice complies with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 8.1. See TEX. R. APP. P. 8.1. 

Accordingly, this appeal and all time periods are stayed from the date the bankruptcy petition 

was filed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 8.2. 

We, therefore, ABATE this appeal. For administrative purposes, the appeal will be 

treated as a closed case, unless and until it is reinstated or severed in accordance with Rule 8.3. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 8.3. 

_________________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 4th day of June, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
# EUR-Lex - 12005SPN07/05/B/02 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12005SPN07/05/B/02

**Protocol concerning the conditions and arrangements for admission of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania to the European Union - Annex VII:List referred to in Article 20 of the Protocol: transitional measures, Romania - 5.Agriculture - B.Veterinary and phytosanitary legislation - II.Phytosanitary legislation **

*
Official Journal L 157 , 21/06/2005 P. 0150 - 0151 *

II. Phytosanitary legislation

31991 L 0414: Council Directive 91/414/EEC of 15 July 1991 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market (OJ L 230, 19.8.1991, p. 1), as last amended by:

- 32004 L 0099: Commission Directive 2004/99/EC of 1.10.2004 (OJ L 309, 6.10.2004, p. 6).

By way of derogation from Article 13(1) of Directive 91/414/EEC, Romania may postpone the deadlines for the provision of the information referred to in Annex II and Annex III to Directive 91/414/EEC for plant protection products currently authorised in Romania and marketed exclusively on Romanian territory and containing copper compounds (sulphate, oxychloride or hydroxide), sulphur, acetochlor, dimethoate and 2,4-D, provided that those ingredients are at the time listed in Annex I to that Directive. The abovementioned deadlines may be postponed until no later than 31 December 2009, except for 2,4-D for which the deadline may be postponed until no later than 31 December 2008. The above provisions shall only apply to those applicant companies which effectively started working on the generation or acquisition of the required data before 1 January 2005.

--------------------------------------------------
EXHIBIT 32.1

                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
                       as adopted pursuant to Section 906
                        of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of AngelCiti Entertainment, Inc. (the
"Company") on Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2005
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), we, George Gutierrez, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and
Dean Ward, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.




Dated: February 1, 2006                /s/ George Gutierrez
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       George Gutierrez, Chief Executive Officer


Dated: February 1, 2006                /s/ Dean Ward
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Dean Ward, Chief Financial Officer
§ 1236.28 What additional requirements apply to the selection and maintenance of electronic records storage media for permanent records? ( a ) Agencies must maintain the storage and test areas for electronic records storage media containing permanent and unscheduled records within the following temperature and relative humidity ranges: ( 1 ) Temperature—62° to 68 °F.
( 2 ) Relative humidity—35% to 45%.
( b ) Electronic media storage libraries and test or evaluation areas that contain permanent or unscheduled records must be smoke-free.
( c ) For additional guidance on the maintenance and storage of CDs and DVDS, agencies may consult the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Special Publication 500-252, Care and Handling of CDs and DVDs at *http://www.itl.nist.gov/iad/894.05/papers/CDandDVDCareandHandlingGuide.pdf ,* contact phone number (301) 975-6478.
( d ) Agencies must test magnetic computer tape media no more than 6 months prior to using them to store electronic records that are unscheduled or scheduled for permanent retention. This test should verify that the magnetic computer tape media are free of permanent errors and in compliance with NIST or industry standards.
( e ) Agencies must annually read a statistical sample of all magnetic computer tape media containing permanent and unscheduled records to identify any loss of data and to discover and correct the causes of data loss. In magnetic computer tape libraries with 1800 or fewer tape media, a 20% sample or a sample size of 50 media, whichever is larger, should be read. In magnetic computer tape libraries with more than 1800 media, a sample of 384 media should be read. Magnetic computer tape media with 10 or more errors should be replaced and, when possible, lost data must be restored. All other magnetic computer tape media which might have been affected by the same cause (i.e., poor quality tape, high usage, poor environment, improper handling) must be read and corrected as appropriate.
( f ) Before the media are 10 years old, agencies must copy permanent or unscheduled data on magnetic records storage media onto tested and verified new electronic media.
# EUR-Lex - 12007P036 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12007P036

**Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - TITLE IV - SOLIDARITY - Article 36 - Access to services of general economic interest **

*
Official Journal 303 , 14/12/2007 P. 0010 - 0010 *

Article 36

Access to services of general economic interest

The Union recognises and respects access to services of general economic interest as provided for in national laws and practices, in accordance with the Treaties, in order to promote the social and territorial cohesion of the Union.

--------------------------------------------------
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM RX MEDICAL
SERVICES CORP., FORM 10-K, YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,657
<ALLOWANCES>                                       380
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,356
<PP&E>                                           1,155
<DEPRECIATION>                                     157
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,547
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           26,859
<BONDS>                                            736
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      3,003
<COMMON>                                            15
<OTHER-SE>                                     (29,379)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,547
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,844
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,548
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (111)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   723
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,415
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (4,731)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (4,731)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (15,183)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   (507)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (20,421)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (2.42)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (2.42)


</TABLE>
§ 1008.7 Conduct of employees. ( a ) *Handling of records subject to the Privacy Act.* Employees whose duties require handling of records subject to the Privacy Act shall, at all times, take care to protect the integrity, security and confidentiality of these records.
( b ) *Disclosure of records.* No employee of the Presidio Trust may disclose records subject to the Privacy Act unless disclosure is permitted under § 1008.9 or is to the individual to whom the record pertains.
( c ) *Alteration of records.* No employee of the Presidio Trust may alter or destroy a record subject to the Privacy Act unless such alteration or destruction is: ( 1 ) Properly undertaken in the course of the employee's regular duties; or
( 2 ) Required by a decision under §§ 1008.18 through 1008.23 or the decision of a court of competent jurisdiction.
# EUR-Lex - 12004V051 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V051

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART I - TITLE VI — THE DEMOCRATIC LIFE OF THE UNION - Article I-51 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0036 - 0036 *

Article I-51

Protection of personal data

1. Everyone has the right to the protection of personal data concerning him or her.

2. European laws or framework laws shall lay down the rules relating to the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data by Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies, and by the Member States when carrying out activities which fall within the scope of Union law, and the rules relating to the free movement of such data. Compliance with these rules shall be subject to the control of independent authorities.

--------------------------------------------------
# EUR-Lex - 12002M038 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 12002M038

**Treaty on European Union (Nice consolidated version) - Title VI: Provisions on police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters - Article 38 **

*
Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0026 - 0026 Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0167 - Consolidated version *

Treaty on European Union (Nice consolidated version)

Title VI: Provisions on police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters

Article 38

Article 38

Agreements referred to in Article 24 may cover matters falling under this title.