alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order filed January 3, 2019

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 17

- 00315

- CR

____________ JOHN ANTHONY VELA , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 209th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cau se No. 1444432



### ORDER

This court has determined, pursuant to T exas Rule of Appellate Procedure 34.5(f) and 34.6(g)(2), that it must inspect the original of State's Exhibit 2, a map and State's Exhibit 65, a chart.The clerk of the 209th District Court is directed to deliver to the Clerk of this

court the original of State's Exhibit 2, a map and State's Exhibit 65, a chart, on or
before January 10, 2019. The Clerk of this court is directed to receive, maintain, and keep safe this original exhibit; to delive r it to the justices of this court for their inspection; and, upon completion of inspection, to return the original of State's Exhibit 2, a map and State's Exhibit 65, a chart, to the clerk of the 209th District
Court.

PER CURIAM
§ 1254.110 Does NARA ever rescind permission to microfilm? We may, at any time, rescind permission to microfilm records if: ( a ) You fail to comply with the microfilming procedures in § 1254.108;
( b ) Inspection of the processed microfilm reveals persistent problems with the quality of the filming or processing;
( c ) You fail to proceed with the microfilming or project as indicated in the request, or
( d ) The microfilming project has an unanticipated adverse effect on the condition of the documents or the space set aside in the NARA facility for microfilming.
( e ) You fail to pay NARA fees in the agreed to amount or on the agreed to payment schedule.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**SATELLITE SECURITY CORPORATION**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of SatelliteSecurity Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John L. Phillips, Chief Executive Officerof the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

1.The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

2. The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Date:November 16, 2006 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been providedto the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

) 

) 

 Florida Power & Light Company ) MUR 8082 

 ) 

) 

) 

CONSENT TO EXTEND THE TIME TO COMMENCE 

A CIVIL LAW ENFORCEMENT ACTION, SUIT, OR PROCEEDING

Respondent, Florida Power & Light Company, hereby consents to toll the statute 

of limitations for any civil enforcement action, suit, or proceeding that the Federal 

Election Commission might institute in connection with MUR 8082 pursuant to 52 

U.S.C. § 30109(a) for an additional thirty (30) days. 

This agreement will extend the time to institute a civil law enforcement suit for 

an additional thirty (30) calendar days from the expiration date of the five-year statute of 

limitations found at 28 U.S.C. § 2462 or any other statute of limitations or repose that 

may be applicable in this matter. 

There shall be no additional consent to extend the time to institute a civil law 

enforcement suit without the written consent of the Respondent. 

 1/17/23 

_________________________________ ________________________ 

Caleb Burns Date 

On behalf of the Respondent 

MUR808200123
# EUR-Lex - 12006M053 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12006M053

**Treaty on European Union (consolidated version) - Title VIII - Final provisions - Article 53 **

*
Official Journal C 321 E , 29/12/2006 P. 0035 - 0036 Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0032 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0172 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 191 , 29/07/1992 P. 0063 *

Article 53 [4]

This Treaty, drawn up in a single original in the Danish, Dutch, English, French, German, Greek, Irish, Italian, Portuguese and Spanish languages, the texts in each of these languages being equally authentic, shall be deposited in the archives of the Government of the Italian Republic, which will transmit a certified copy to each of the governments of the other signatory States.

Pursuant to the Accession Treaty of 1994, the Finnish and Swedish versions of this Treaty shall also be authentic. Pursuant to the Accession Treaty of 2003, the Czech, Estonian, Hungarian, Latvian, Lithuanian, Maltese, Polish, Slovak and Slovene versions of this Treaty shall also be authentic.

[4] See Appendix at the end of this publication.

--------------------------------------------------
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 5465 

To clarify where court may be held for certain district courts in Texas 

and California. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 10, 2024 

Mr. CRUZ (for himself and Mr. PADILLA) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To clarify where court may be held for certain district courts 

in Texas and California. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ORGANIZATION OF TEXAS DISTRICT COURTS. 

4 Section 124(b)(2) of title 28, United States Code, is 

5 amended, in the matter preceding paragraph (3), by in6 serting ‘‘and College Station’’ before the period at the end. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 5465 IS

1 SEC. 2. ORGANIZATION OF CALIFORNIA DISTRICT COURTS. 

2 Section 84(d) of title 28, United States Code, is 

3 amended by inserting ‘‘and El Centro’’ after ‘‘at San 

4 Diego’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
-84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72 -70

 38

 40

 42

 44

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲

▲

▲

▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 2000

 1000

18 12 06 00

05/30

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 30 May 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.06 N 76.88 W Meters AGL
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 5392 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 5392

 To prohibit discrimination based on political affiliation in granting 
                          disaster assistance.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 21, 2024

Mr. Lankford (for himself, Mr. Scott of Florida, Mr. Tillis, Mr. Budd, 
  Mr. Ossoff, Mr. Marshall, and Mr. Peters) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland 
                   Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit discrimination based on political affiliation in granting 
                          disaster assistance.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Stopping Political Discrimination in 
Disaster Assistance Act''.

SEC. 2. NONDISCRIMINATION IN DISASTER ASSISTANCE.

    Section 308(a) of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and 
Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5151(a)) is amended by striking 
``or economic status'' and inserting ``economic status, or political 
affiliation''.
                                 <all>
```
Presidential Documents

56851 

Federal Register 

Vol. 71, No. 187 

Wednesday, September 27, 2006 

Title 3— 

The President 

Proclamation 8056 of September 22, 2006 

Family Day, 2006 

By The President Of The United States of America 

A Proclamation 

Families instill values, shape character, and are the foundation of a hopeful 

society. On Family Day, we celebrate the rich traditions of family life and 

emphasize the importance of stable and loving relationships between children 

and parents. 

Families are a source of inspiration and strength, and they provide hope 

and solace in the face of adversity. Children especially benefit from the 

bonds of family. During critical times in children’s lives, family members 

encourage them to aim high and achieve their dreams, herald their successes, 

and promote positive behavior. Through their guidance and support, family 

members prepare young people for the challenges and opportunities ahead. 

Parents, grandparents, aunts, uncles, and other caregivers are the first line 

of defense in helping young people avoid the dangers and temptations 

they face each day. By being attentive to children’s activities and choices, 

families can help young people grow into successful adults. 

My Administration remains committed to strengthening American families. 

We are working to protect the institution of marriage, promote responsible 

fatherhood, encourage parents to be involved in the education of their children, and provide every child with the opportunity to learn. By helping 

America’s families thrive, we can build a brighter future for our country 

and give our young people the foundation they need to make good choices 

and build lives of purpose. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States 

of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution 

and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim September 25, 2006, 

as Family Day. I call on the people of the United States to observe this 

day by reflecting on the blessings of family and participating in family 

activities that strengthen relationships between children and parents. 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with MISCELLANEOUS
56852 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 187 / Wednesday, September 27, 2006 / Presidential Documents 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twenty-second 

day of September, in the year of our Lord two thousand six, and of the 

Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirtyfirst. 

[FR Doc. 06–8351 

Filed 9–26–06; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 3195–01–P 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with MISCELLANEOUSGWBOLD.EPS</GPH>
## R **esponses to Comments Not Addressed in the Preamble to the Final Rule:**  **Transportation Conformity Rule**  **Restructuring**

**Am endments** 

Docket ID No. EPA - HQ - OAR - 20 09 - 0 128Docket ID No. EPA -HQ - OAR - 2009 - 0128

2 Comment: One commenter suggested that the air quality model ing process used in transportation conformity

should be reformed to use the most recent air quality data available , rather than prediction - based models . This commenter also suggested that emissions budgets have a built - in level of flexibility , such as a 10 to 15 percent cushion, to allow for increases in emissions . Third, this commenter suggested that hot - spot analy sis should be removed from the regulations. Response : All of these comme nts are outside the scope of today ’s rulemaking. EPA did not in this rulemaking propose an y regulatory revisions addressing air quality modeling, and therefore the first comment is outside the scope of this rulemaking. T he current requirements to model f

uture transportation activity and resulting emissions are based on Section 176(c)(2)(A) of the Clean Air Act , which requires that “emissions expected from implementation of such plans and programs are consistent with estimates of emissions from motor vehic les and necessary emissions reductions cont a ined in the applicable air quality implementation plan...” In other words, the purpose of the conformity requirement is to examine future transportation sector emissions . Therefore, conformity anal ys es necessarily

involve prediction of future air quality . Further, in this rulemaking EPA did not propose any revisions to the conformity budget test regulations and did not propose changes to the hot - spot requirements. Therefore, the comments on those issues are also outside the scope of today ’s action. Comment: One commenter recommended that EPA and the Federal Highway Administration conduct an educational outreach campaign with MPOs and state Departments of Transportation once the new [ozone] standards go into effect. Response: EPA did not propose an y regulatory revisions specificall y addressing the new ozon e standards. Therefore, this comment is outside the scope of this rulemaking. Nevertheless, EPA will continue to ensure that conformity implementers have the necessary information , including guidance and training, to meet conformity requirements for an y new or revised NAAQS.
**Worksheet Description** 

TE Losses Output of the T&E model showing speciesd-specific reductions in IM&E mortality (A1E). **T&E Baselines & Benefits.xlsx** Author: Abt Associates Inc. Created: 1/24/14 Purpose: Output file of the threatened and endangered (T&E) species model which presents species-specific reductions in IM&E mortality of T&E species under baseline conditions and rule options.

File Info Page 1 of 1species region Baseline Proposal 4Final Rule Proposal 2

paddlefish inland 18841.352 7930.095 8245.35915659.681 pallid.sturgeon inland 89.509 65.385 67.607 77.985 topeka.shiner inland 3984.874 2910.927 3009.822 3471.853

TE Losses Page 1 of 1
EXHBIT 32.1
                                                                  -----------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Aussie  Apparel Group Ltd.
(the  "Company")  on Form 10-qsb for the period  ending June 30, 2003,  as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
Bruce MacGregor,  Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certifies to the best
of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
              material   respects,   the  financial   condition  and  result  of
              operations of the Company.


         /s/ BRUCE MACGREGOR
         -----------------------------
         Bruce MacGregor
         Chief Executive Officer

         August 18, 2003
## UNMANNED AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS UNDERWAY AT THIS LOCATION 

# -- - --- **-~ --**  

# -

---=- - **~L:l:- U**  **·~A--** 

## R .:c:r

- ' . .



### ' a

• ....,_
a **~** rT'
s l[l 1 ,1\.
.I

. . 

## . · :;

\ If



# ' I **~**

**~** PLEASE REMAIN AT LEAST 150 FEET FROM THIS

AREA IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS OR CONCERNS PLEASE CONTACT THE AIRCRAFT OPERATOR AT 864 314 0416 AERIAL IMAGING SYSTEMS FAA EXEMPTION NUMBER 00000000
# EUR-Lex - 12004V033 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V033

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART I - TITLE V — EXERCISE OF UNION COMPETENCE - CHAPTER I — COMMON PROVISIONS - Article I-33 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0026 - 0027 *

Article I-33

The legal acts of the Union

1. To exercise the Union's competences the institutions shall use as legal instruments, in accordance with Part III, European laws, European framework laws, European regulations, European decisions, recommendations and opinions.

A European law shall be a legislative act of general application. It shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

A European framework law shall be a legislative act binding, as to the result to be achieved, upon each Member State to which it is addressed, but shall leave to the national authorities the choice of form and methods.

A European regulation shall be a non-legislative act of general application for the implementation of legislative acts and of certain provisions of the Constitution. It may either be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States, or be binding, as to the result to be achieved, upon each Member State to which it is addressed, but shall leave to the national authorities the choice of form and methods.

A European decision shall be a non-legislative act, binding in its entirety. A decision which specifies those to whom it is addressed shall be binding only on them.

Recommendations and opinions shall have no binding force.

2. When considering draft legislative acts, the European Parliament and the Council shall refrain from adopting acts not provided for by the relevant legislative procedure in the area in question.

--------------------------------------------------
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Special Emphasis Panel HIV Vaccine Design and Development Teams—RFP-P-NIAID-DAIDS-BAA-06-19-ZAI1-CCH-AA-C1.                    

*Date:*                         February 16-17, 2006.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 6 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Hilton Silver Spring, 8727 Colesville Road, Silver Spring, MD 20910.                     

*Contact Person:*                         Clayton C. Huntley, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institutes of Health/NIAID, 6700B Rockledge Drive, MSC 7616, Bethesda, MD 20892-7616, 301-496-2550,                         *ch405t@nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: January 23, 2006.

Anna Snouffer, 

Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 06-847 Filed 1-27-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000868740
<NAME> AEI NET LEASE INCOME & GROWTH FUND XIX LTD PARTNERSHIP

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,613,175
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   73,372
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,686,547
<PP&E>                                      13,787,825
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,106,715)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,827,956
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          388,882
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  15,439,074
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,827,956
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,792,599
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,983,883
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (113,581)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (113,581)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (113,581)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (5.30)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (5.30)


</TABLE>
USDANEWS