alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Bankruptcy Court

Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division

Chapter 13

Case No. 16 B 28736

Judge Timothy A Barnes

Uconer S Sims

Debtor(s)

IN RE: )

)

)

Notice of Motion

Uconer S Sims

3854 West Division St.

Chicago, IL 60651

Debtor Attorney: Chang & Carlin LLP

via Clerk's ECF noticing procedures

On November 10, 2016 at 10:30 am, I will appear at the location listed to 

the right, and present this motion.

I certify under penalty of perjury that this office caused a copy of this 

notice to be delivered to the persons named above by U.S. mail or by the 

methods indicated on or before Thursday, November 3, 2016.

> Dirksen Federal Building

> 219 South Dearborn

> Courtroom 744

> Chicago, IL 60604

/s/ MARILYN O. MARSHALL

MARILYN O. MARSHALL, TRUSTEE

Motion to Dismiss Case For Unreasonable Delay

Comes now Marilyn O. Marshall, Standing Trustee, and requests that this case be dismissed, as Debtor(s) failed to file the 

required documents pursuant to 11 USC §521, §1307, §349, and Rule 3015, and in support thereof states the following:

1. Debtor(s) filed for Chapter 13 on 09/08/2016.

2. The debtor(s) have failed to provide an Affidavit of Compliance.

3. The debtor(s) have failed to provide copies of all payment advices or other evidence of payment received within 60 days 

before the date of filing the petition.

4. The debtor(s) have failed to provide to the Trustee a copy of the Federal income tax return (or transcript thereof) for the 

four years preceding the filing of the petition.

5. The debtor(s) have failed to maintain payments to the Trustee's office as required under 11 U.S.C. §1326.

6. The debtor(s) have failed to attend one scheduled §341(a) meeting of the creditors

7. The debtor(s) have failed to provide required identification and or social security documentation.

8. The debtor(s) have failed to resolve the pending objection(s) to the plan.

9. The stay has been extended in this case and the debtor has failed to timely make his first plan payment.

10. The debtor's failure to confirm a plan in a timely manner constitutes unreasonable delay.

WHEREFORE, the Trustee prays that this case be dismissed, and for any and all other relief this court deems just and proper.

Case 16-28736 Doc 19 Filed 11/03/16 Entered 11/03/16 16:09:36 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2
MARILYN O. MARSHALL, TRUSTEE

Office of the Chapter 13 Trustee /s/ MARILYN O. MARSHALL

224 S Michigan Ave

Ste 800

Chicago, IL 60604

(312) 431-1300

Case 16-28736 Doc 19 Filed 11/03/16 Entered 11/03/16 16:09:36 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2
# EUR-Lex - 12004V432 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V432

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART III — THE POLICIES AND FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - TITLE VII — COMMON PROVISIONS - Article III-432 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0184 - 0184 *

Article III-432

The seat of the Union's institutions shall be determined by common accord of the governments of the Member States.

--------------------------------------------------
# EUR-Lex - 12005SP048 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12005SP048

**Protocol concerning the conditions and arrangements for admission of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania to the European Union - PART FIVE:PROVISIONS RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THIS PROTOCOL - TITLE I:SETTING UP OF THE INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES - Article 48 **

*
Official Journal L 157 , 21/06/2005 P. 0043 - 0043 *

Article 48

The Committee of the Regions shall be enlarged by the appointment of 27 members representing regional and local bodies in Bulgaria and Romania, who either hold a regional or local authority electoral mandate or are politically accountable to an elected assembly. The terms of office of the members thus appointed shall expire at the same time as those of the members in office at the time of accession.

--------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

October 31, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh 128904 Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 128904 COA: 261109 Oakland CC: 03-188500-FH WAYNE ROY HONSINGER, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, th e application for leave to ap peal the May 12, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

d1024 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 31, 2005

Clerk
§ 600.514 Relation to other laws. ( a ) Persons affected by these regulations should be aware that other Federal and state statutes may apply to their activities.
( b ) Fishing vessel operators must exercise due care in the conduct of fishing activities near submarine cables. Damage to submarine cables resulting from intentional acts or from the failure to exercise due care in the conduct of fishing operations subjects the fishing vessel operator to enforcement action under the International Convention for the Protection of Submarine Cables, and to the criminal penalties prescribed by the Submarine Cable Act (47 U.S.C. 21) and other laws that implement that Convention. Fishing vessel operators also should be aware that the Submarine Cable Act prohibits fishing operations at a distance of less than 1 nautical mile (1.85 km) from a vessel engaged in laying or repairing a submarine cable; or at a distance of less than 0.25 nautical mile (0.46 km) from a buoy or buoys intended to mark the position of a cable when being laid, or when out of order, or broken.
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 As Adopted Pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


I, Michael Timms, Chief Executive Officer and President of Australian Forest
Industries (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended
March 31, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: June 14, 2005


/s/ Michael Timms
-----------------
Michael Timms
Chief Executive Officer and President
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-40751

Conference Calendar

__________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSE CRUZ LOPEZ-RAMIREZ,

 Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. B-95-CR-107-01

- - - - - - - - - -

April 16, 1996

Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jose Cruz Lopez-Ramirez appeals the denial of his pre-trial

motion to suppress evidence contending that Border Patrol Agent

Jaime Reyes did not have reasonable suspicion to stop the vehicle

in which he traveled. We have reviewed the record and the briefs

of the parties and hold that the evidence showed that Reyes held

reasonable suspicion to make an investigatory stop. See United

States v. Inocencio, 40 F.3d 716, 721 (5th Cir. 1994). 

AFFIRMED.
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite ofcataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)
**Title:****Potentialinterference from Broadband over Power Line (BPL) systems to federal governmentradiocommunications at 1.7 - 80 MHz [electronic resource] : phase 1 study.**** 
SuDocNumber:C60.10:04-413
ItemNumber:0126-D-03(online)
CGPsystem Number:000589728
 
Vol. 1
Vol. 2
 
 **
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000868740
<NAME> AEI NET LEASE INCOME & GROWTH FUND XIX LTD PARTNERSHIP

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         835,832
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   27,373
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               863,205
<PP&E>                                      15,955,492
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,578,302)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,240,395
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          386,048
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  14,854,347
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,240,395
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,913,647
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  657,220
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,528,383
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,528,383
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,528,383
<EPS-BASIC>                                      72.96
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    72.96


</TABLE>
# EUR-Lex - 12004V/AFI/DCL/37 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V/AFI/DCL/37

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - FINAL ACT - B. Declarations concerning Protocols annexed to the Constitution - Declarations concerning the Protocol on the Treaty and the Act of Accession of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia and the Slovak Republic - 37.Declaration on Unit 1 and Unit 2 of the Bohunice V1 nuclear power plant in Slovakia **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0469 - 0469 *

37. Declaration on Unit 1 and Unit 2 of the Bohunice V1 nuclear power plant in Slovakia

THE CONFERENCE,

Noting Slovakia's commitment to close Unit 1 and Unit 2 of the Bohunice V1 nuclear power plant at the end of 2006 and 2008 respectively and declaring the Union's willingness to continue to provide financial aid until 2006 in continuation of the pre-accession aid planned under the Phare programme in support of Slovakia's decommissioning effort;

Noting the need to adopt implementing provisions regarding continued Union assistance;

Points out that specific provisions to that end have been included in Title IX of Part Two of the Protocol on the Treaty and Act of Accession of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia and the Slovak Republic.

--------------------------------------------------
#### § 12.2 Purpose of National Cemeteries.

National cemeteries are established as national shrines in tribute to the gallant dead who have served in the Armed Forces of the United States. Such areas are protected, managed and administered as suitable and dignified burial grounds and as significant cultural resources. As such, the authorization of activities that take place in national cemeteries is limited to those that are consistent with applicable legislation and that are compatible with maintaining the solemn commemorative and historic character of these areas.
Economic Development Administration

Public Works Program



INNOVATION. REGIONAL COLLABORATION. JOB CREATION. WWW.EDA.GOV Follow us on Twitter @US_EDA

Public Works Program

What does the Public Works program do?

EDA’s Public Works program helps distressed communities revitalize, expand, and upgrade their physical 

infrastructure. This program enables communities to attract new industry; encourage business expansion; diversify 

local economies; and generate or retain long-term, private-sector jobs and investment through the acquisition or 

development of land and infrastructure improvements needed for the successful establishment or expansion of 

industrial or commercial enterprises.

What kind of public works projects does EDA fund?

EDA Public Works program investments help facilitate the transition of communities from being distressed to

becoming competitive by developing key public infrastructure, such as technology-based facilities that utilize 

distance learning networks, smart rooms, and smart buildings; multitenant manufacturing and other facilities; 

business and industrial parks with fiber optic cable; and telecommunications and development facilities. In 

addition, EDA invests in traditional public works projects, including water and sewer systems improvements, 

industrial parks, business incubator facilities, expansion of port and harbor facilities, skill-training facilities, and 

brownfields redevelopment.

What criteria are used in determining which projects receive planning grants?

 The project’s demonstrated alignment with at least one of EDA’s current investment priorities as published on 

EDA’s website at www.eda.gov

 The project’s potential to increase the capacity of the community or region to promote job creation and private 

investment in the regional economy

 The likelihood that the project will achieve its projected outcomes 

 Ability of the applicant to successfully implement the proposed project, including the applicant’s financial and 

management capacity and the applicant’s capacity to secure the support of key public and private sector 

stakeholders 

What are some examples of successful Public Works projects?

For examples of successful EDA projects, visit http://www.eda.gov/annual-reports/fy2012/

How do I get more information on how to apply?

The Federal Funding Opportunity (FFO) is available at http://www.eda.gov/funding-opportunities/index.htm. To discuss 

any project proposals in further detail, contact your EDA Regional Office.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

In re: 

Lavada D Turner

Debtor(s)

Case No. 16-25471

CHAPTER 13 STANDING TRUSTEE’S FINAL REPORT AND ACCOUNT

Glenn Stearns, chapter 13 trustee, submits the following Final Report and Account of the 

administration of the estate pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1302(b)(1). The trustee declares as follows:

1) The case was filed on 08/09/2016.

2) The plan was confirmed on NA .

3) The plan was modified by order after confirmation pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1329 on

NA .

4) The trustee filed action to remedy default by the debtor in performance under the plan 

on NA .

5) The case was dismissed on 09/09/2016.

6) Number of months from filing to last payment: 0.

7) Number of months case was pending: 3.

8) Total value of assets abandoned by court order: NA .

9) Total value of assets exempted: NA .

10) Amount of unsecured claims discharged without payment: $0.00.

11) All checks distributed by the trustee relating to this case have cleared the bank.

UST Form 101-13-FR-S (9/1/2009)

Case 16-25471 Doc 16 Filed 11/09/16 Entered 11/09/16 13:19:30 Desc Page 1

 of 3
Receipts:

Total paid by or on behalf of the debtor $0.00

Less amount refunded to debtor $0.00

NET RECEIPTS: $0.00

Expenses of Administration:

Attorney’s Fees Paid Through the Plan $0.00

Court Costs $0.00

Trustee Expenses & Compensation $0.00

Other $0.00

TOTAL EXPENSES OF ADMINISTRATION: $0.00

Attorney fees paid and disclosed by debtor: $0.00

Scheduled Creditors:

Creditor

Name Class

Claim

Scheduled

Claim

Asserted

Claim

Allowed

Int.

Paid

Principal

Paid

Summary of Disbursements to Creditors:

Secured Payments:

Mortgage Ongoing

Mortgage Arrearage

Debt Secured by Vehicle

All Other Secured

TOTAL SECURED:

Priority Unsecured Payments:

Domestic Support Arrearage

Domestic Support Ongoing

All Other Priority

TOTAL PRIORITY:

GENERAL UNSECURED PAYMENTS:

Claim

Allowed

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

Principal

Paid

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

Interest

Paid

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

UST Form 101-13-FR-S (9/1/2009)

Case 16-25471 Doc 16 Filed 11/09/16 Entered 11/09/16 13:19:30 Desc Page 2

 of 3
Disbursements:

Expenses of Administration $0.00

Disbursements to Creditors $0.00

TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS : $0.00

12) The trustee certifies that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 5009, 

the estate has been fully administered, the foregoing summary is true and complete, and all 

administrative matters for which the trustee is responsible have been completed. The trustee 

requests a final decree be entered that discharges the trustee and grants such other relief as may 

be just and proper.

Dated: 11/09/2016

STATEMENT: This Unified Form is associated with an open bankruptcy case, therefore, Paperwork Reduction 

Act exemption 5 C.F.R. § 1320.4(a)(2) applies.

By:/s/ Glenn Stearns

Trustee

UST Form 101-13-FR-S (9/1/2009)

Case 16-25471 Doc 16 Filed 11/09/16 Entered 11/09/16 13:19:30 Desc Page 3

 of 3
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on
Form S-8 pertaining to the Credit Depot Corporation 1993 Stock Option Plan and
in the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 33-310125) and related Prospectus
of Credit Depot Corporation of our report dated August 29, 1997, with respect
to the consolidated financial statements of Credit Depot Corporation included
in the Annual Report (Form 10-KSB) for the year ended June 30, 1997.



                                        ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Atlanta, Georgia
October 14, 1997
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Richard McLay Melvin

, * From the 29th District

Court of Palo Pinto County,

Trial Court No. 14188

.

Vs. No. 11

- 11

- 00 127

- CR * May 16, 2013

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by McCall, J.

(Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

McCall, J., and Willson , J. )

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is

no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s

opinion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
Exhibit 31

RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATIONS

I, Richard G. Hunter, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Food Technology
Service, Inc. (the "Company").

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statement made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects,
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The Company's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15d-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:

     (a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its
consolidates subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

     (b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and
procedures, and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     (c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the Company's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company's fourth
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.   The Company's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
Company's auditors and the audit committee of Company's board of directors (or
persons performing the equivalent functions):

      (a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and

      (b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal control
over financial reporting.

Date:  April 3, 2007

By:  /s/ Richard G. Hunter, Ph.D.
Chief Executive and Financial Officer
Case 16-24884 Doc 17 Filed 10/28/16 Entered 11/01/16 09:12:46 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 1
BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

In the Matter of ) 

Montanans Against Corruption in 

Congress and Timothy Bechtold in his 

official capacity as treasurer: EPS 

Dismissal Report 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

MUR 8088 

CERTIFICATION 

I, Vicktoria J. Allen, Deputy Secretary of the Federal Election 

Commission, do hereby certify that on March 06, 2024, the Commission 

decided by a vote of 6-0 to take the following actions in MUR 8088: 

1. Dismiss the Complaint consistent with the Commission’s 

prosecutorial discretion to determine the proper ordering of its 

priorities and use of agency resources. Heckler v. Chaney, 

470 U.S. 821, 831-32 (1985), as recommended in the EPS Dismissal 

Report dated February 22, 2024. 

 

2. Close the file as to all Respondents. 

3. Send the appropriate letters. 

Commissioners Broussard, Cooksey, Dickerson, Lindenbaum, Trainor, and 

Weintraub voted affirmatively for the decision. 

 Attest: 

 March 6, 2024 

 

Date Vicktoria J. Allen 

 Deputy Secretary of the Commission 

Vicktoria J 

Allen

Digitally signed by Vicktoria J 

Allen 

Date: 2024.03.06 16:08:11 

-05'00'

MUR808800008