alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 29.119 What additional operating standards apply to drilling and production operations? If you conduct drilling and production operations, you must meet all of the following standards: ( a ) To conduct drilling operations, you must: ( 1 ) Use containerized mud circulation systems for operations;
( 2 ) Not create or use earthen pits;
( 3 ) Take all necessary precautions to keep your wells under control at all times, using only employees, contractors, or subcontractors trained and competent in well control procedures and equipment operation, and using industry-accepted well control equipment and practices; and
( 4 ) Design, implement, and maintain integrated casing, cementing, drilling fluid, completion, stimulation, and blowout prevention programs to prevent escape of fluids to the surface and to isolate and protect usable water zones throughout the life of the well, taking into account all relevant geologic and engineering factors.
( b ) To conduct production operations, in addition to meeting the standards of paragraphs (a)(1) through (a)(4) of this section, you must do all of the following: ( 1 ) Monitor producing conditions for early indications that could lead to loss of mechanical integrity of producing equipment.
( 2 ) Maintain all surface equipment and the wellhead to prevent leaks or releases of any fluids or air pollutants.
( 3 ) Identify wells and related facilities with appropriate signage. Signs must remain in place until the well is plugged and abandoned and the related facilities are removed. Signs must be of durable construction, and the lettering must be legible and large enough to be read under normal conditions at a distance of at least 50 feet. Each sign must show the name of the well, name of the operator, and the emergency contact phone number.
( 4 ) Remove all equipment and materials when not needed for the current phase of your operation.
( 5 ) Plug all wells, leaving the surface in a clean and safe condition that will not impede surface reclamation or pose a hazard to wildlife or human health and safety, in accordance with § 29.117.
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 187 (Wednesday, September 27, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 56581]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-8335]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY

[Meeting No. 06-05]


Sunshine Act Meeting

Time and Date:  10 a.m., September 29, 2006. Walker County Civic 
Center, 10052 North Highway 27, Rock Spring, Georgia 30739.

Status:  Open.

Agenda

Old Business

    Approval of minutes of July 28, 2006, Board Meeting.

New Business

1. President's Report.
2. Report of the Finance, Strategy, and Rates Committee.
    A. Power supply arrangements with Bristol, Virginia.
    B. Extension of power supply arrangements with Warren Rural 
Electric Cooperative Corporation.
    C. Termination of Limited Interruptible Power (LIP) and Limited 
Firm Power (LFP) Programs.
3. Report of the Operations, Environment, and Safety Committee.
    A. Contract with Stone and Webster Construction, Inc., for 
supplemental maintenance and modifications for TVA nuclear operating 
units and for Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant Unit 1 recovery.
    B. Revisions to the approval of the contract with Louisiana Energy 
Services, L.P., for uranium enrichment services for Sequoyah and Watts 
Bar Nuclear Plants Units 1.
4. Report of the Audit and Ethics Committee.
5. Report of the Community Relations Committee.
6. Report of the Human Resources Committee.
    A. TVA's contribution to the TVA Retirement System.
    B. Delegation of authority to the Chief Executive Officer to 
approve trustees, Retirement System investment managers and their 
agreements, and retirement plan amendments which do not increase plan 
liabilities or have a direct cost impact on TVA.
    C. Renewal and extension of interim human resource and labor 
relations delegations until December 31, 2006.
    D. Award of contract to Medco to administer TVA's prescription drug 
plan for employees and retirees.
    E. FY 2007 Corporate Scorecard.
    F. Other.
7. Report of the Corporate Governance Committee.
8. Approval of Committee charters.
9. Information item approved by the Board previously.
    A. Selection of William Stanley Orser as Interim Chief Operating 
Officer.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Please call TVA Media Relations at 
(865) 632-6000, Knoxville, Tennessee. Information is also available at 
TVA's Washington Office (202) 898-2999. People who plan to attend the 
meeting and have special needs should call (865) 632-6000. Anyone who 
wishes to comment on any of the agenda in writing may send their 
comments to: TVA Board of Directors, Board Agenda Comments, 400 West 
Summit Hill Drive, Knoxville, Tennessee 37902.

    Dated: September 22, 2006.
Maureen H. Dunn,
General Counsel and Secretary.
[FR Doc. 06-8335 Filed 9-25-06; 12:58 pm]
BILLING CODE 8120-08-P
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

WASHINGTON. D.C. 20463 

::5 

Melissa Pena, Treasurer 

American Conservative Union 

1331 H Street N.W. 

Suite 500 

Washington, DC 2Q005 

RE: MUR6920 

Dear Ms. Pena: 

The.Federal Election Commission received'a cornplaint that indicates American 

Conservative Union and you in your official capacity as treasurer may have violated the Federal 

Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended ("the Act"). A copy of the complaint is enclosed. 

We have numbered this matter MUR 6920. Please refer to this number in all future 

correspondence. 

Under the Act you have the opportunity to demonstrate in writing that no action should 

be taken against American Conservation Union and you in your official capacity as treasurer in 

this matter. Please submit any factual or legal materials that you believe are relevant to the 

Commission's analysis of this matter. Where appropriate, statements should be submitted under 

oath. Your response, which should be addressed to the General Counsel's Office, must.be 

submitted within 15 days of receipt of this letter. If no response is received within 15 days, the 

Commission may take further action based on the available information. 

This matter will remain confidential in accordance with 52 U.S.C. § 30109(a)(4)(B) and 

§ 30109(a)(12)(A) unless you notify the Commission in writing that you wish the matter to be 

made public. If you intend to be represented by counsel in this matter, please advise the 

Commission by completing the enclosed fonn stating the name, address and telephone number 

of such counsel, and authorizing such counsel to receive any notifications and otheicommunications from the Commission. Please note that you have a legal obligation to preserve 

all documents, records and materials relating to the subject matter of the complaint until such 

tittle as yoii afe notified that the Commission has ciosdd its file in this matter. See 18 U.S.C. § 

1519. 
Any correspond^ce sent to the Commission, such as. a response, must be addressed to 

one of the fbllbwing (liote, if submitting via email this Office will provide an electronic receipt 

by email); 

Mail 

Federal Election Commission 

Office of Complaints. Examination 

and Legal Administration 

Attn: Frankie Hampton, Paralegal 

999 E Street, NW 

Washington, DC 20436 

Eifiall 

fhampton@fec.gov 

I f you have any questions, please contact Frankie Hampton at (202) 694-1650 or toll free 

at 1 -800-424-953.0. For your informaition, we have enclosed a brief description of the 

Commission's procedures for handling complaints. 

Sincerely, 

Jeff S. Jordan 

Assistant General Counsel 

Complaints Examination & 

Legal Administration 

Enclosures: 

1. Complaint 

2. Procedures 

3. Designation of Counsel Statement
**Exhibit
10.1**
 
 **DESCRIPTION
OF DIRECTORS AND**
 **NAMED
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS COMPENSATION**
 
 In
accordance with the “Frequently Asked Questions” bulletin posted by the staff of
the Division of Corporation Finance of the Securities and Exchange Commission on
November 23, 2004 on the Securities and Exchange Commission’s website, we are
disclosing the following information that the Securities and Exchange Commission
may deem to be material definitive agreements with our directors and executive
officers.
 
 The
Company does not compensate its directors. Each director of the Company is also
a director of the Bank. Meetings of the directors of the Company are held
immediately before or after meetings of the directors of the Bank. In 2004,
directors of the Bank received $1,500 per meeting of the Board of Directors
attended in 2004. Additionally, each non-employee member of a committee of the
Board of Directors of the Bank received a fee ranging between $500 - $650 per
committee meeting. A total of $138,945 in the year ended December 31, 2004 was
paid as directors’ fees and committee fees for the Bank
 
 We have
not entered into employment agreements with any of executive officers, who are
employed on an at-will basis. In 2005, the Bank’s executive officers will earn
the annual base salaries set forth opposite their names below and will be
entitled to a bonus, if any, as determined by the Compensation
Committee:
 
 Name
    Title
    2005
      SalaryAlan
      J. Hyatt
    President
      and Chief Executive Officer
    $250,000Melvin
      E. Meekins, Jr.
    Executive
      Vice President
    $298,000S.
      Scott Kirkley
    Senior
      Vice President, Secretary and Treasurer
    $208,000Cecelia
      Lowman
    Chief
      Financial Officer
    $148,000
 
 The
executive officers are entitled to participate in the Bank’s 401(k) Plan and in
an Employee Stock Ownership Plan, and previously participated in a Supplemental
Executive Retirement Plan, which was terminated effective December 31, 2004. The
Bank makes a matching contribution of 50% of each executive officer’s 401(k)
Plan contribution up to 6% of such executive officer’s salary, and an additional
non-matching contribution at the discretion of the Board of
Directors.
Editorial Note on Part 648
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 648 appear at 62 FR 14651, Mar. 27, 1997.

§ 648.9 VMS vendor and unit requirements. ( a ) *Approval.* The type-approval requirements for VMS MTUs and MCSPs for the Greater Atlantic Region are those as published by the NMFS Office of Law Enforcement (OLE) in the Federal Register, and are available upon request. Both the national type-approval requirements at 50 CFR part 600, subpart Q and any established regional standards must be met in order to receive approval for use in the Greater Atlantic Region. The NMFS OLE Director shall approve all MTUs, MCSPs, and bundles including those operating in the Greater Atlantic Region.
( b ) *Maintenance.* Once approved, VMS units must maintain the minimum standards for which they were approved in the type approval requirements. Any changes made to the original submission for approval of an MTU or MCSP by NMFS must follow the procedures outlined in the type approval requirements.
( c ) *Notification.* A list of approved VMS vendors will be published on the Northeast Regional Office Web site and in each proposed and final rule for implementing or modifying VMS requirements for specific fisheries.
( d ) *Revocations.* Revocation procedures for type-approvals are at 50 CFR 600.1514. In the event of a revocation, NMFS will provide information to affected vessel owners as explained at 50 CFR 600.1516. In these instances, vessel owners may be eligible for the reimbursement of the cost of a new type-approved EMTU should funding for reimbursement be available.
[74 FR 20530, May 4, 2009, as amended at 79 FR 77410, Dec. 24, 2014]
304(m) CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

OW-2008-0517

DCN 07375 

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
# EPA Update MACS Annual Convention January 29, 2011 

# Welcome!

# Agenda 8:00 – Montreal Protocol Success & Updates – Drusilla Hufford , EPA/SPD 8:10 – Updates on Alternative Refrigerants for MVACs – Yaidi Cancel EPA/SPD Part I: HFO - 1234yf – SNAP, SNUR & VOC -Exemption Petition Part II: CO2 – SNAP 8:25 – Section 609 Overview & Next Steps – Yaidi Cancel, EPA/SPD 8:30 – A/C Credits in the Light- duty GHG Rule– Brian Nelson, EPA/OTAQ 8:50 – California’s Regulatory Proposal for MAC – Tao Zhan, CARB 9:10 – Road to the Future: Opportunities Ahead – Drusilla Hufford , EPA/SPD 9:20 – Q&A Session 9:30 – Adjourn 2
# EUR-Lex - 12006E057 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12006E057

**Treaty establishing the European Community (consolidated version) - Part Three - Community policies - TITLE III - Free movement of persons, services and capital - Chapter 4 - Capital and payments - Article 57 **

*
Official Journal C 321 E , 29/12/2006 P. 0064 - 0064 Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0056 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0199 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0025 - Consolidated version *

Article 57 [2]

1. The provisions of Article 56 shall be without prejudice to the application to third countries of any restrictions which exist on 31 December 1993 under national or Community law adopted in respect of the movement of capital to or from third countries involving direct investment – including in real estate – establishment, the provision of financial services or the admission of securities to capital markets. In respect of restrictions existing under national law in Estonia and Hungary, the relevant date shall be 31 December 1999.

2. Whilst endeavouring to achieve the objective of free movement of capital between Member States and third countries to the greatest extent possible and without prejudice to the other Chapters of this Treaty, the Council may, acting by a qualified majority on a proposal from the Commission, adopt measures on the movement of capital to or from third countries involving direct investment – including investment in real estate – establishment, the provision of financial services or the admission of securities to capital markets. Unanimity shall be required for measures under this paragraph which constitute a step back in Community law as regards the liberalisation of the movement of capital to or from third countries.

[2] Article amended by the 2003 Act of Accession. See Appendix at the end of this publication.

--------------------------------------------------
EXHIBIT 31.02
 
 Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification
 
 I, Ahmed S. Hassanein, certify that:
  1.  I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Sage Fund Limited Partnership;
  2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
  3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
  4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
  a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,  to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
  b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
  c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
  5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
  a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
  b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
 
 Date: August 14, 2009
 
 By:
/s/ Ahmed S. HassaneinAhmed S. HassaneinChief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)







E-3
From: Elliot Berke

To: Joseph Wenzinger

Cc: Amy Rothstein

Subject: Re: AO 2022-22 (DataVault I)

Date: Monday, November 21, 2022 3:43:33 PM

Joseph:

Please see answers below.

Elliot S. Berke

Managing Partner

Berke Farah LLP

701 8th St NW, Suite 620

Washington, DC 20001

202.744.0894 (Tel.)

eberke@berkefarah.com

http://www.berkefarah.com

This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended

recipient, please advise by return e-mail and delete immediately without reading forwarding

to others. The following statement is provided pursuant to U.S. Treasury Department

Regulations: This communication is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used,

by a taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that the Internal Revenue Service may

impose on the taxpayer.

On Nov 21, 2022, at 3:04 PM, Joseph Wenzinger <JWenzinger@fec.gov> wrote:

Mr. Berke:

Thank you for responding to our questions to help clarify certain points in Advisory

Opinion Request 2022-22 (DataVault I). Our understanding of the information you

provided appears below. Please confirm the accuracy of the statements below or

correct them as necessary and return them to us via email. Your response may be

posted on the Commission’s website as a supplement to DataVault’s advisory opinion

request.

1. In DataVault’s ordinary course of business, DataVault would enter into contracts

with political committees to provide them with customized NFTs in exchange for

a fee for each NFT transferred by the political committee to a contributor.

Confirmed.
2. DataVault will charge its political committee clients the same fee, and apply the

same terms and conditions, as it does to its non-political clients, including forprofit and non-profit entities. In addition, DataVault will provide NFTs to political

committees on a nonpartisan basis.

Confirmed.

3. DataVault expects that the price that it will charge each political committee for

transferred NFTs will enable DataVault to recoup its costs and make a

reasonable profit.

Confirmed.

4. DataVault’s contract with each political committee client will require the political

committee to pay DataVault for transferred NFTs in a commercially reasonable

period of time after the transfers and will require each political committee to

return to DataVault any NFTs that have not been transferred to a contributor

within a commercially reasonable period of time.

Confirmed.

5. DataVault will maintain internal processes of its own, and also contractually

require its political committee clients to maintain internal processes, to track the

number and timing of NFT transfers. DataVault will be able to track and verify

the number and timing of NFT transfers via changes in the blockchain.

Confirmed.

Please feel free to contact me with any questions. Thank you.

Joseph Wenzinger

Attorney, Policy Division

Office of General Counsel

Federal Election Commission

Office: (202) 694-1351

Cell: (202) 322-3186
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION    WASHINGTON,D.C.

VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL 

Chris K. Gober & Eric Wang March 5, 2024 

The Gober Group PLLC 

14425 Falcon Head Blvd., Building E-100, Suite 226 

Austin, TX 78738 

politicallaw@gobergroup.com 

RE: MUR 8058 

Dear Messrs. Gober and Wang: 

On August 26, 2022, the Federal Election Commission notified your client, Save Missouri 

Values and Cabell Hobbs in his official capacity as treasurer (“Save Missouri Values”), of a 

Complaint indicating violations of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended. A 

copy of the Complaint was forwarded to your client at that time. 

The Commission considered the Complaint, but there was an insufficient number of votes 

to take no action at this time with respect to the allegation that Save Missouri Values violated 

52 U.S.C. § 30122 by knowingly accepting a contribution in the name of another. The 

Commission then voted to dismiss the Complaint in this matter. Accordingly, the Commission 

voted to close the file on February 29, 2024. One or more Statements of Reasons providing a basis 

for the Commission’s decision will follow. 

Documents related to the case will be placed on the public record within 30 days. See 

Disclosure of Certain Documents in Enforcement and Other Matters, 81 Fed. Reg. 50,702 (Aug. 2, 

2016). 

If you have any questions, please contact Justine A. di Giovanni, the attorney assigned to 

this matter, at (202) 694-1574. 

Sincerely, 

Mark Allen 

Assistant General Counsel 

MUR805800134
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 5135 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 5135

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase penalties for 
            unauthorized disclosure of taxpayer information.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 23, 2024

  Mr. Kennedy introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase penalties for 
            unauthorized disclosure of taxpayer information.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Taxpayer Data Protection Act''.

SEC. 2. INCREASE IN PENALTIES FOR UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURES OF TAXPAYER 
              INFORMATION.

    (a) In General.--Paragraphs (1), (2), (3), (4), and (5) of section 
7213(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 are each amended by 
striking ``$5,000, or imprisonment of not more than 5 years'' and 
inserting ``$250,000, or imprisonment of not more than 10 years''.
    (b) Disclosures of Return Information of Multiple Taxpayers Treated 
as Multiple Violations.--Section 7213(a) of such Code is amended by 
adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(6) Disclosures of return information of multiple 
        taxpayers treated as multiple violations.--For purposes of 
        paragraphs (1), (2), (3), (4), and (5), a separate violation 
        occurs with respect to each taxpayer whose return or return 
        information is disclosed in violation of any such paragraph.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to disclosures made after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```