alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Zach Bair, certify that:  1.
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Immediatek, Inc.;2.
    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;4.
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rule 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:  a)
    designed such disclosure controls
and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the
registrant, including its
consolidating subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly
report was prepared;b)
    evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure controls and
procedures as of the end of the
period covered by this quarterly
report (the Evaluation Date); andc)
    presented in this quarterly report
our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures based on the
required evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;  5.
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):  a)
    all significant deficiencies in the
design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely
affect the registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and
report financial data and have
identified for the registrants
auditors any material weaknesses in
internal controls; andb)
    any fraud, whether or not material,
that involves management or other
employees who have a significant
role in the registrants internal
controls;  6.
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.Dated this 16th day of May, 2005 /s/ Zack BairZack Bair, PresidentPrincipal Executive and Financial Officer
U.S. SECURITIES AND ECHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-QSB

(Mark One)

[X]  Quarterly report pursuant to section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2000.
[] Transition report pursuant to section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 for the Transition period from ____ to ____.

Commission File NO. 0-26557

Stemcell Global Research, Inc.
(Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)

Nevada                        88-0407473
(State or other jurisdiction            (I.R.S Identification No.)
of incorporation or organization)

9978 Washington Street, Camp Dennison, Ohio 45111
(Address of principal executive offices)

Issuer's telephone no. (513) 831-8007

Check whether the issuer:

(1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to file such reports), and

(2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days
X Yes          No

As of September 30, 2000, there were 1,924,350 shares outstanding of issuer's
common stock.

PART I.  FINANCIAL INFORMATION.

Item 1.  Financial Statements

The information required by this item is attached as an exhibit hereto.

Item 2.  Management's Discussion and Analysis or Plant of Operation.

The information required by this Item is attached as an
Exhibit hereto.

Signatures

In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.

Date:    November 15, 2000
         ------------

By:      /s/ Dr. Garrell Noah
         --------------------
         Dr. Garrell Noah, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive
         Officer
         ----------------------------------------------------------------------

By:      /s/ David Leytze
         --------------------
         David Leytze, Director, Vice President, CFO, Secretary/Treasurer
         ----------------------------------------------------------------
BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

In the Matter of )

Congresswoman Maxine Waters and 

Citizens for Waters: Draft B Tally Vote

)

)

)

AO 2024-02

CERTIFICATION

I, Vicktoria J. Allen, Deputy Secretary of the Federal Election 

Commission, do hereby certify that on February 15, 2024, the Commission 

failed by a vote of 2-4 to approve Draft B Tally Vote, as recommended in the 

Memorandum to the Commission dated February 13, 2024.

Commissioners Broussard and Weintraub voted affirmatively for the 

motion. Commissioners Cooksey, Dickerson, Lindenbaum, and Trainor

dissented.

Attest:

 February 15, 2024

Date Vicktoria J. Allen

Deputy Secretary of the Commission
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 191 (Tuesday, October 3, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 58369]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-8454]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Eastern Washington Cascades Provincial Advisory Committee and the 
Yakima Provincial Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of Meetings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Eastern Washington Cascades Provincial Advisory Committee 
and the Yakima Provincial Advisory Committee will meet on the following 
dates: October 16, October 24, November 8, November 17, and December 6, 
2006. All of these meetings (except the November 17 meeting) will be 
held at the Okanogan and Wenatchee National Forests Headquarters 
office, 215 Melody Lane, Wenatchee, WA. The meeting on November 17 will 
be held at Chelan County Fire District <greek-i>1, 206 Easy Street, 
Wenatchee, WA. These meetings will begin at 9:30 a.m. and continue 
until 3 p.m. During these meetings Provincial Advisory Committee 
members will continue the collaboration process on forest plan issues 
relating to the preparation of a revised forest plan for the Okanogan 
and Wenatchee National Forests. All Eastern Washington Cascades and 
Yakima Province Advisory Committee meetings are open to the public.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Direct questions regarding this 
meeting to Paul Hart, Designated Federal Official, USDA, Wenatchee 
National Forest, 215 Melody Lane, Wenatchee, Washington 98801, 509-664-
9200.

    Dated: September 27, 2006.
Paul Hart,
Designated Federal Official, Okanogan and Wenatchee National Forests.
[FR Doc. 06-8454 Filed 10-2-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
# EUR-Lex - 12005SA052 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12005SA052

**Act concerning the conditions of accession of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania and the adjustments to the Treaties on which the European Union is founded - PART FIVE:PROVISIONS RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THIS ACT - TITLE II:APPLICABILITY OF THE ACTS OF THE INSTITUTIONS - Article 52 **

*
Official Journal L 157 , 21/06/2005 P. 0219 - 0219 *

Article 52

Upon accession, Bulgaria and Romania shall be considered as being addressees of directives and decisions within the meaning of Article 249 of the EC Treaty and of Article 161 of the EAEC Treaty, provided that those directives and decisions have been addressed to all the present Member States. Except with regard to directives and decisions which have entered into force pursuant to Article 254(1) and (2) of the EC Treaty, Bulgaria and Romania shall be considered as having received notification of such directives and decisions upon accession.

--------------------------------------------------
# EUR-Lex - 12006EN02 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12006EN02

**Treaty establishing the European Community (consolidated version) - Annex II - Overseas countries and territories to which the provisions of Part Four of the Treaty apply **

*
Official Journal C 321 E , 29/12/2006 P. 0186 - 0186 Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0159 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0306 - Consolidated version *

ANNEX II

OVERSEAS COUNTRIES AND TERRITORIES

to which the provisions of Part Four of the Treaty apply

- Greenland

- New Caledonia and Dependencies

- French Polynesia

- French Southern and Antarctic Territories

- Wallis and Futuna Islands

- Mayotte

- Saint Pierre and Miquelon

- Aruba

- Netherlands Antilles:

- Bonaire

- Curaçao

- Saba

- Sint Eustatius

- Sint Maarten

- Anguilla

- Cayman Islands

- Falkland Islands

- South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands

- Montserrat

- Pitcairn

- Saint Helena and Dependencies

- British Antarctic Territory

- British Indian Ocean Territory

- Turks and Caicos Islands

- British Virgin Islands

- Bermuda

--------------------------------------------------
# EUR-Lex - 12006M049 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12006M049

**Treaty on European Union (consolidated version) - Title VIII - Final provisions - Article 49 **

*
Official Journal C 321 E , 29/12/2006 P. 0034 - 0035 Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0031 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0171 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 191 , 29/07/1992 P. 0063 *

Article 49

Any European State which respects the principles set out in Article 6(1) may apply to become a member of the Union. It shall address its application to the Council, which shall act unanimously after consulting the Commission and after receiving the assent of the European Parliament, which shall act by an absolute majority of its component members.

The conditions of admission and the adjustments to the Treaties on which the Union is founded, which such admission entails, shall be the subject of an agreement between the Member States and the applicant State. This agreement shall be submitted for ratification by all the contracting States in accordance with their respective constitutional requirements.

--------------------------------------------------
IN THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS

‐‐‐‐ ooOoo

‐‐‐‐

William York and Nathan York,

Plaintiffs and Appellant

,

v.

Performance Auto, Inc.; James K.

Slavens; and 10 John Does,

Defendants and Appellees. )

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

) PER CURIAM DECISION

Case No. 20110908

‐ CA

F I L E D

(February 24, 2012)

2012 UT App 58

‐‐‐‐‐

Fourth District, Fillmore Department, 090700014

The Honorable Samuel D. McVey

Attorneys: William York, Delta, Appellant Pro Se

James K. Slavens, Fillmore, for Appellees

‐‐‐‐‐

Before Judges Orme, Thorne, and Christiansen.

¶1 William York appeals the district court’s September 7, 2011 order dismissing his

complaint without prejudice. This matter is before the court on a sua sponte motion for

summary disposition. We affirm.

¶2 Rule 4(b)(i) of the Utah Rules of Civil Procedure provides that “[i]n an action

commenced under Rule 3(a)(1), the summons together with a copy of the complaint

shall be served no later than 120 days after the filing of the complaint unless the court

allows a longer period of time for good cause shown.” Utah R. Civ. P. 4(b)(i). “If the

summons and complaint are not timely served, the action shall be dismissed, without

prejudice on application of any party or upon the court’s own initiative.” Id. Rule

4(b)(ii) provides that “[i]n any action brought against two or more defendants on which20110908

‐ CA 2 service has been timely obtained upon one of them, the plaintiff may proceed against

those served, and the others may be served or appear at any time prior to trial.” Id. R.

4(b)(ii).

¶3 York’s action was previously before this court wherein we determined that the

May 28, 2009 order dismissing Mr. Slavens was not a final, appealable order. See York v.

Performance Auto, Inc., 2011 UT App 257, ¶ 12, 264 P.3d 212. “By dismissing the only

served co

‐ defendant, the trial court did not dispose of the case but converted it into an

action against the remaining unserved defendants.” Id. This court determined that

“until the trial court enters an order concluding the litigation as to all litigants,

including unserved defendants, York has no final order from which to appeal.” Id.

¶4 On September 7, 2011, the trial court determined that York had not served any of

the remaining defendants within 120 days of the filing of the complaint. Furthermore,

because Mr. Slavens had been dismissed from the lawsuit on June 3, 2009, York could

not rely on rule 4(b)(ii) of the Utah Rules of Civil Procedure to extend the time to serve

the remaining defendants. Thus, the district court dismissed the complaint against the

remaining defendants without prejudice. York fails to demonstrate that the district

court erred by dismissing his complaint without prejudice.

¶5 Affirmed.

____________________________________ Gregory K. Orme, Judge

____________________________________ William A. Thorne Jr., Judge

____________________________________ Michele M. Christiansen, Judge
# EUR-Lex - 12005SPN06/03 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12005SPN06/03

**Protocol concerning the conditions and arrangements for admission of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania to the European Union - Annex VI:List referred to in Article 20 of the Protocol: transitional measures, Bulgaria - 3.Free movement of capital **

*
Official Journal L 157 , 21/06/2005 P. 0108 - 0108 *

3. FREE MOVEMENT OF CAPITAL

Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe

1. Notwithstanding the obligations under the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe, Bulgaria may maintain in force for five years from the date of accession the restrictions laid down in its legislation, existing at the time of signature of the Treaty of Accession, on the acquisition of ownership over land for secondary residences by nationals of the Member States or the States which are a party to the European Economic Area Agreement (EEAA) non-resident in Bulgaria and by legal persons formed in accordance with the laws of another Member State or of an EEAA State.

Nationals of the Member States and nationals of the States which are a party to the European Economic Area Agreement who are legally resident in Bulgaria shall not be subject to the provisions of the preceding subparagraph or to any rules and procedures other than those to which nationals of Bulgaria are subject.

2. Notwithstanding the obligations under the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe, Bulgaria may maintain in force for seven years from the date of accession the restrictions laid down in its legislation, existing at the time of signature of the Treaty of Accession, on the acquisition of agricultural land, forests and forestry land by nationals of another Member State, by nationals of the States which are a party to the European Economic Area Agreement and by legal persons formed in accordance with the laws of another Member State or an EEAA State. In no instance may a national of a Member State be treated less favourably in respect of the acquisition of agricultural land, forests and forestry land than at the date of signature of the Accession Treaty or be treated in a more restrictive way than a national of a third country.

Self-employed farmers who are nationals of another Member State and who wish to establish themselves and legally reside in Bulgaria, shall not be subject to the provisions of the preceding subparagraph or to any procedures other than those to which nationals of Bulgaria are subject.

A general review of these transitional measures shall be held in the third year following the date of accession. To this effect, the Commission shall submit a report to the Council. The Council may, acting unanimously on a proposal from the Commission, decide to shorten or terminate the transitional period indicated in the first subparagraph.

--------------------------------------------------
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 5230 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 5230

To amend the United States-Mexico Transboundary Aquifer Assessment Act 
     to reauthorize the United States-Mexico transboundary aquifer 
                          assessment program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 25, 2024

 Mr. Kelly (for himself and Mr. Cornyn) introduced the following bill; 
   which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the United States-Mexico Transboundary Aquifer Assessment Act 
     to reauthorize the United States-Mexico transboundary aquifer 
                          assessment program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Transboundary Aquifer Assessment 
Program Act'' or the ``TAAP Act''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF TRANSBOUNDARY AQUIFER ASSESSMENT PROGRAM.

    (a) Designation of Priority Transboundary Aquifers.--Section 
4(c)(2) of the United States-Mexico Transboundary Aquifer Assessment 
Act (42 U.S.C. 1962 note; Public Law 109-448) is amended by striking 
``New Mexico or Texas'' and inserting ``New Mexico, Texas, or Arizona 
(other than an aquifer underlying Arizona and Sonora, Mexico, that is 
partially within the Yuma groundwater basin designated by the order of 
the Director of the Arizona Department of Water Resources dated June 
21, 1984)''.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--Section 8(a) of the United 
States-Mexico Transboundary Aquifer Assessment Act (42 U.S.C. 1962 
note; Public Law 109-448) is amended by striking ``fiscal years 2007 
through 2016'' and inserting ``fiscal years 2025 through 2035''.
    (c) Sunset of Authority.--Section 9 of the United States-Mexico 
Transboundary Aquifer Assessment Act (42 U.S.C. 1962 note; Public Law 
109-448) is amended by striking ``enactment of this Act'' and inserting 
``enactment of the Transboundary Aquifer Assessment Program Act''.
                                 <all>
```
No. 11-5680.

#### Quezada *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT  99.2

                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                    As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
                          Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002

In  connection  with  the  Annual  Report  of  American  Income  Fund  I-E,  a
Massachusetts  Limited Partnership Liquidating Trust (the "Trust"), on Form 10-K
for  the  period  ended  September  30,  2002  as  filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission  on  the  date  hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, the
Principal  Financial  and  Accounting  Officer  of  the  Trust, hereby certifies
pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.  1350  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002  that:

     (1)     the  Report  of  the  Trust  filed  today  fully  complies with the
requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

     (2)     the  information  contained  in  the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Trust.

                    /s/  Wayne  E.  Engle
                    ---------------------
                    Wayne  E.  Engle
                    Vice  President  (Chief  Financial  Officer)
Equis  Corporation, as Manager of the Trust, under a Liquidating Trust Agreement
dated  as  of  July  18,  2002,  Wilmington  Trust  Company,  as Trustee and not
Individually

                                    March  31,  2003
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MELINDA GABRIELLA

VALENZUELA, FKA Enrique Mendez,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

COUNTY OF MARICOPA; et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 14-17115

D.C. No. 2:14-cv-01153-NVWMHB

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Neil V. Wake, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 18, 2015** 

Before: TASHIMA, OWENS, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

Melinda Gabriella Valenzuela, an Arizona state prisoner, appeals pro se

from the district court’s judgment dismissing her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging

Eighth Amendment violations in connection with her medical care. We have

FILED

NOV 27 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s

interpretation and application of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Andrews v. Cervantes, 493

F.3d 1047, 1052 (9th Cir. 2007). We affirm.

Dismissal of Valenzuela’s action was proper because at least three of

Valenzuela’s prior § 1983 actions were dismissed as frivolous or for failure to state

a claim, and Valenzuela did not plausibly allege that she was “under imminent

danger of serious physical injury” at the time she lodged the complaint. 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(g); Andrews, 493 F.3d at 1055 (an exception to the three-strikes rules exists

only where “the complaint makes a plausible allegation that the prisoner faced

‘imminent danger of serious physical injury’ at the time of filing”).

Valenzuela’s request for an order stating that documents must be mailed to

the court, filed on April 24, 2015, is denied.

AFFIRMED.

2 14-17115
# EUR-Lex - 12004V216 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V216

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART III — THE POLICIES AND FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - TITLE III — INTERNAL POLICIES AND ACTION - CHAPTER III — POLICIES IN OTHER AREAS - Section 2 — Social policy - Article III-216 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0097 - 0097 *

Article III-216

The Commission shall draw up a report each year on progress in achieving the objectives of Article III-209, including the demographic situation within the Union. It shall forward the report to the European Parliament, the Council and the Economic and Social Committee.

--------------------------------------------------
###### Editorial Note on Part 622

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 622 appear at 79 FR 57837, Sept. 26, 2014 and at 81 FR 32253, May 23, 2016.

#### § 622.16 Notice regarding South Atlantic special management zones (SMZs).

See §§ 622.182(a) and 622.382(a)(1)(v), respectively, regarding fishing and gear restrictions in South Atlantic SMZs that apply to snapper-grouper and coastal migratory pelagic fisheries and broadly to gear types of multiple fisheries.