alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration

# AGENCY:

Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

# ACTION:

Notice of issuance of advisory circular. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces the issuance of Advisory Circular 25.856-2, “Installation of Thermal/Acoustic Insulation for Burnthrough Protection.” The advisory circular provides information and guidance regarding an acceptable means, but not the only means, of compliance with the portions of the airworthiness standards for transport category airplanes that deal with the installation of thermal/acoustic insulation.

# DATES:

AC 25.856-2 was issued by the FAA Transport Airplane Directorate in Renton, Washington, on January 17, 2006.

*How To Obtain Copies:*                         You can download a copy of advisory Circular 25.856-2 from the Internet at                         *http://www.airweb.faa.gov/​rgl.*                         A paper copy will be available in approximately 6-8 weeks from the U.S. Department of Transportation, Subsequent Distribution Office, M-30, Ardmore East Business Center, 3341 Q 75th Avenue, Landover, MD 20795.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Kenna Sinclair, FAA Standardization Branch, ANM-113, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98055-4056; telephone (425) 227-1556; e-mail                         *kenna.sinclair@faa.gov.*

Issued in Renton, Washington, on January 17, 2006.

Ali Bahrami,

Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.

[FR Doc. 06-809 Filed 1-27-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
§ 665.204 Prohibitions. In addition to the general prohibitions specified in § 600.725 of this chapter and § 665.15, it is unlawful for any person to do any of the following: ( a ) Fish for Hawaii bottomfish MUS or ECS, or seamount groundfish MUS using gear prohibited under § 665.206.
( b ) Fish for, or retain on board a vessel, Hawaii bottomfish MUS or ECS in the Ho'omalu Zone or the Mau Zone without the appropriate permit registered for use with that vessel issued under § 665.13.
( c ) Serve as primary operator or relief operator on a vessel with a Mau or Ho'omalu Zone permit without completing a protected species workshop conducted by NMFS, as required by § 665.203.
( d ) Fail to notify the USCG at least 24 hours prior to making any landing of bottomfish taken in the Ho'omalu Zone, as required by § 665.205.
( e ) Fish within any protected species study zone in the NWHI without notifying the Regional Administrator of the intent to fish in these zones, as required under § 664.205.
( f ) Falsify or fail to make or file reports of all fishing activities shoreward of the outer boundary of the MHI management subarea, in violation of § 665.14(a) or (b).
( g ) Own a vessel or fish from a vessel that is used to fish non-commercially for any Hawaii bottomfish MUS or ECS in the MHI management subarea without either a MHI non-commercial bottomfish permit or a State of Hawaii Commercial Marine License, in violation of § 665.2 or § 665.203(a)(2).
( h ) Fish for or possess any bottomfish MUS as defined in § 665.201, in the MHI management subarea after a closure of its respective fishery, in violation of § 665.211.
( i ) Sell or offer for sale any bottomfish MUS as defined in § 665.201, after a closure of its respective fishery, in violation of § 665.211.
( j ) Harvest, possess, or land more than a total of five fish (all species combined) identified as Deep 7 bottomfish in § 665.201 from a vessel in the MHI management subarea, while holding a MHI non-commercial bottomfish permit, or while participating as a charter boat customer, in violation of § 665.212.
( k ) Fish for or possess any Hawaii bottomfish MUS or ECS, or seamount groundfish MUS in the Hancock Seamounts Ecosystem Management Area, in violation of § 665.209.
[75 FR 2205, Jan. 14, 2010, as amended at 75 FR 69015, Nov. 10, 2010; 84 FR 2772, Feb. 8, 2019; 84 FR 29397, June 24, 2019; 85 FR 26624, May 5, 2020]
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20463

BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

In the Matters of )

)

Citizens for a Working America; ) MUR 7859

Joel Riter; Norman Cummings )

)

Jobs and Progress Fund, Inc.; Vaughn Church; ) MUR 7860

Thomas Norris; Mark Miller )

)

SUPPLEMENTAL STATEMENT OF REASONS OF 

COMMISSIONER SEAN J. COOKSEY

In addition to the Statement of Reasons I joined in these matters with Vice Chair Dickerson 

and Commissioner Trainor,

1

I have previously explained my views on the statute of limitations 

and equitable remedies in a Supplemental Statement of Reasons in MURs 6917 & 6929 (Scott 

Walker, et al.) and MURs 6955 & 6983 (John R. Kasich, et al.).

2

As detailed in that statement, I believe that mandating retrospective reporting and 

disclosure is a penalty subject to 18 U.S.C. § 2462’s limitations period, and that even if mandatory 

disclosure were not a penalty, any reporting requirement would still be barred under the 

concurrent-remedies doctrine. I applied the same reasoning to these matters and accordingly voted 

to dismiss pursuant to the expiration of the statute of limitations.3

______________________________ December 17, 2021

Sean J. Cooksey Date

Commissioner

1 Statement of Reasons of Vice Chair Dickerson and Commissioners Cooksey and Trainor (Dec. 17, 2021), 

MUR 7859 (Citizens for a Working America, et al.) and MUR 7860 (Jobs and Progress Fund, Inc., et al.). 

2 Supplemental Statement of Reasons of Commissioner Sean J. Cooksey (April 29, 2021), MURs 6917 & 6929 

(Scott Walker, et al.) and MURs 6955 & 6983 (John R. Kasich, et al.).

3 Certification (Oct. 28, 2021), MUR 7859 (Citizens for a Working America, et al.); Certification (Oct. 28, 

2021), MUR 7860 (Jobs and Progress Fund, Inc., et al.).

MUR785900132
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [USITC SE-06-054] 

# Agency Holding the Meeting:

United States International Trade Commission. 

# Time and Date:

September 18, 2006 at 1 p.m. 

# Place:

Room 101, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: (202) 205-2000. 

# Status:

Open to the public. 

# Matters to be Considered:

1. Agenda for future meetings: None. 

2. Minutes. 

3. Ratification List. 

4. Inv. No. 731-TA-702 (Second Review) (Ferrovanadium and Nitrided Vanadium from Russia)—briefing and vote. (The Commission is currently scheduled to transmit its determination and Commissioners' opinions to the Secretary of Commerce on or before September 28, 2006.). 

5. Outstanding Action Jackets: none. 

In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the agenda of the following meeting. 

Issued: September 7, 2006. 

By order of the Commission.

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 06-7613 Filed 9-8-06; 12:08 pm] 

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
§ 635.33 Archival tags. ( a ) *Landing an HMS with a surgically implanted archival tag.* Notwithstanding other provisions of this part, persons may catch, possess, retain, and land an Atlantic HMS in which an archival tag has been surgically implanted, provided such persons return the tag to the research entity indicated on the tag or to NMFS at an address designated by NMFS and report the fish as required in § 635.5.
( b ) *Quota monitoring.* If an Atlantic HMS landed under the authority of paragraph (a) of this section is subject to a quota, the fish will be counted against the applicable quota for the species consistent with the fishing gear and activity which resulted in the catch. In the event such fishing gear or activity is otherwise prohibited under applicable provisions of this part, the fish shall be counted against the reserve or research quota established for that species, as appropriate.
[81 FR 55379, Aug. 19, 2016]
Exhibit 31-2
                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Thomas J. Riha, certify that:

1.   I have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report on Form 10-Q of WNC  HOUSING  TAX
     CREDIT FUND VI, SERIES 7, L.P. ;

2.   Based on my knowledge,  this  quarterly  report does not contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to
     make the statements  made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such
     statements  were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this quarterly report;

3.   Based on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
     information  included  in this  quarterly  report,  fairly  present  in all
     material respects the financial  condition,  results of operations and cash
     flows of the  registrant  as of, and for,  the  periods  presented  in this
     quarterly report;

4.   The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer  and  I are  responsible  for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules  13a-15(e) and  15d-15(e))  for the registrant and we
     have:

(a)  Designed such  disclosure  controls and  procedures to ensure that material
     information   relating  to  the  registrant,   including  its  consolidated
     subsidiaries,  is  made  known  to  us by  others  within  those  entities,
     particularly  during  the period in which  this  quarterly  report is being
     prepared;

(b)  Evaluated the  effectiveness  of the registrant's  disclosure  controls and
     procedures  and  presented  in  this  report  our  conclusions   about  the
     effectiveness of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of
     the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the  registrant's  internal  control
     over financial  reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
     fiscal quarter that has  materially  affected,  or is reasonably  likely to
     materially  affect,  the  registrant's   internal  control  over  financial
     reporting; and

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
     our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
     the  registrant's  independent  registered  accounting  firm and the  audit
     committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
     equivalent functions):

(a)  All  significant  deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses  in the design or
     operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
     likely to adversely affect in the registrant's ability to record,  process,
     summarize and report financial information; and

(b)  Any fraud,  whether or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other
     employees who have a significant role in the registrant's  internal control
     over financial reporting.

Date: July 24, 2008




/s/ Thomas J. Riha
------------------

Senior Vice-President - Chief Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.
Editorial Note on Part 660
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 660 appear at 67 FR 65906, Oct. 29, 2002, 88 FR 81358, Nov. 22, 2023.

§ 660.710 Closure of directed fishery. ( a ) When a quota has been taken, the Regional Administrator will announce in the Federal Register the date of closure of the fishery for the species of concern.
( b ) When a harvest guideline has been taken, the Regional Administrator will initiate review of the species of concern according to section 8.4.8 of the FMP and publish in the Federal Register any necessary and appropriate regulations following Council recommendations.
Editorial Note on Part 622
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 622 appear at 79 FR 57837, Sept. 26, 2014 and at 81 FR 32253, May 23, 2016.

§ 622.446 Spiny lobster import prohibitions. ( a ) *Minimum size limits for imported spiny lobster.* Multiple minimum size limits apply to importation of spiny lobster into the United States—one that applies any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States other than Puerto Rico or the U.S. Virgin Islands, and more restrictive minimum size limits that apply to Puerto Rico, St. Croix, and St. Thomas and St. John, respectively. ( 1 ) No person may import a spiny lobster with less than a 6-ounce (170-gram) tail weight into Puerto Rico. For the purposes of paragraph (a) of this section, a 6-ounce (170-gram) tail weight is defined as a tail that weighs 5.9-6.4 ounces (167-181 grams). If the documentation accompanying an imported spiny lobster, including but not limited to product packaging, customs entry forms, bills of lading, brokerage forms, or commercial invoices, indicates that the product does not satisfy the minimum tail-weight, the person importing such spiny lobster has the burden to prove that such spiny lobster does satisfy the minimum tail-weight requirement or that such spiny lobster has a tail length of 6.2 inches (15.75 cm) or greater or that such spiny lobster has or had a carapace length of 3.5 inches (8.89 cm) or greater. If the imported product itself does not satisfy the minimum tail-weight requirement, the person importing such spiny lobster has the burden to prove that such spiny lobster has a tail length of 6.2 inches (15.75 cm) or greater or that such spiny lobster has or had a carapace length of 3.5 inches (8.89 cm) or greater. If the burden is satisfied, such spiny lobster will be considered to be in compliance with the minimum 6-ounce (170-gram) tail-weight requirement.
( 2 ) See § 622.409 regarding the minimum size limit that applies to spiny lobster imported into any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States other than Puerto Rico or the U.S. Virgin Islands.
( 3 ) See subparts T and U of this part for the minimum size limits that apply to spiny lobster imported into St. Croix and St. Thomas and St. John, respectively.
( b ) *Additional spiny lobster import prohibitions* — ( 1 ) *Prohibition related to tail meat.* No person may import into any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States spiny lobster tail meat that is not in whole tail form with the exoskeleton attached.
( 2 ) *Prohibitions related to egg-bearing spiny lobster.* No person may import into any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States spiny lobster with eggs attached or spiny lobster from which eggs or pleopods (swimmerets) have been removed or stripped. Pleopods are the first five pairs of abdominal appendages.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5264 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5264

  To prohibit use of education funds to make condoms available in an 
                           elementary school.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 7, 1994

  Mr. Franks of Connecticut introduced the following bill; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To prohibit use of education funds to make condoms available in an 
                           elementary school.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION AGAINST CONDOM DISTRIBUTION.

    None of the funds made available under the Elementary and Secondary 
Education Act of 1965 may be used to make condoms available in an 
elementary school.
                                 <all>
```
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 13-13392

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 5:12-cv-00315-WTH-PRL

ROOSEVELT SIMMONS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

K. CIMOCK, 

Unit Manager,

FNU WILLIAMS, 

Captain,

D.B. DREW, 

Defendants-Appellees.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

________________________

(August 14, 2014)

Before JORDAN, ROSENBAUM and BLACK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 

Case: 13-13392 Date Filed: 08/14/2014 Page: 1 of 3 
2

Roosevelt Simmons, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se, appeals the 

district court’s dismissal of his civil rights complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six 

Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), 

alleging that the defendants, various prison officials and staff, illegally took a 

sample of his DNA shortly after the commencement of his incarceration. Upon 

review,1 we affirm.

The district court did not err in dismissing the complaint with prejudice 

pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) because the defendants were acting within the scope of 

their authority in obtaining a DNA sample, see 42 U.S.C. § 14135a; 28 C.F.R. 

§ 28.12, and Simmons has failed to show that the defendants’ actions violated any 

clearly-established constitutional rights, see Andujar v. Rodriguez, 486 F.3d 1199,

1202-03 (11th Cir. 2007). Simmons argues the defendants should have sought to 

obtain his DNA sample closer to his release date rather than shortly after his arrival

at the prison, but he has not shown any authority establishing this rule, nor has he 

shown that a violation of this rule amounts to a constitutional violation sufficient to 

support a claim under Bivens, 403 U.S. at 397. Accordingly, the defendants are 

entitled to qualified immunity from Simmons’ claim, and the district court did not 

err in dismissing the complaint. Moreover, the district court did not err in 

 1 We review de novo the grant of a motion to dismiss under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) for 

failure to state a claim, accepting the complaint’s allegations as true and construing them in the 

light most favorable to the plaintiff. Spain v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 363 F.3d 

1183, 1187 (11th Cir. 2004).

Case: 13-13392 Date Filed: 08/14/2014 Page: 2 of 3 
3

dismissing without leave to amend because Simmons never requested leave to 

amend his complaint to remedy any deficiencies, see Access Now, Inc. v. Sw. 

Airlines Co., 385 F.3d 1324, 1331 (11th Cir. 2004), and because the record gives 

no indication that an amendment would not have been futile, see Corsello v. 

Lincare, Inc., 428 F.3d 1008, 1014 (11th Cir. 2005).

AFFIRMED.

Case: 13-13392 Date Filed: 08/14/2014 Page: 3 of 3
Editorial Note on Part 660
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 660 appear at 67 FR 65906, Oct. 29, 2002, 88 FR 81358, Nov. 22, 2023.

§ 660.706 Pacific Coast Treaty Indian rights. ( a ) Pacific Coast treaty Indian tribes have treaty rights to harvest HMS in their usual and accustomed (U&A) fishing areas in the EEZ.
( b ) Pacific Coast treaty Indian tribes means the Hoh, Makah, and Quileute Indian Tribes and the Quinault Indian Nation.
( c ) The Pacific Coast treaty Indian tribes' U&A fishing areas within the EEZ are set forth in § 660.4 of this chapter.
( d ) *Procedures.* The rights referred to in paragraph (a) of this section will be implemented by the Secretary of Commerce, after consideration of the tribal request, the recommendation of the Council, and the comments of the public. The rights will be implemented either through an allocation of fish that will be managed by the tribes, or through regulations that will apply specifically to the tribal fisheries. An allocation or a regulation specific to the tribes shall be initiated by a written request from a Pacific Coast treaty Indian tribe to the NMFS West Coast Regional Administrator, at least 120 days prior to the time the allocation is desired to be effective, and will be subject to public review through the Council process. The Secretary of Commerce recognizes the sovereign status and co-manager role of Indian tribes over shared Federal and tribal fishery resources. Accordingly, the Secretary of Commerce will develop tribal allocations and regulations in consultation with the affected tribe(s) and, insofar as possible, with tribal consensus.
( e ) *Identification.* A valid treaty Indian identification card issued pursuant to 25 CFR part 249, subpart A, is prima facie evidence that the holder is a member of the Pacific Coast treaty Indian tribe named on the card.
( f ) Fishing (on a tribal allocation or under a Federal regulation applicable to tribal fisheries) by a member of a Pacific Coast treaty Indian tribe within that tribe's U&A fishing area is not subject to provisions of the HMS regulations applicable to non-treaty fisheries.
( g ) Any member of a Pacific Coast treaty Indian tribe must comply with any applicable Federal and tribal laws and regulations, when participating in a tribal HMS fishery implemented under paragraph (d) of this section.
( h ) Fishing by a member of a Pacific Coast treaty Indian tribe outside that tribe's U&A fishing area, or for a species of HMS not covered by a treaty allocation or applicable Federal regulation, is subject to the HMS regulations applicable to non-treaty fisheries.
[69 FR 18453, Apr. 7, 2004, as amended at 81 FR 36808, June 8, 2016]