alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 191 (Tuesday, October 3, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 58419]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-8444]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and 
Bioengineering Special Emphasis Panel, ZEB1 OSR A J1 S Training 
Grants Review.
    Date: December 5, 2006.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Clarion Hotel Bethesda Park, 8400 Wisconsin Avenue, 
Bethesda, MD 20814.
    Contact Person: David George, PhD, Director, Office of 
Scientific Review, National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and 
Bioengineering, 6707 Democracy Blvd., Suite 920, Bethesda, MD 20892, 
301-496-8633, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d4b3b1bba6b3b1b0e594b9b5bdb8fababdbcfab3bba2"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4f282a203d282a2b7e0f222e26236121262761282039">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: September 27, 2006.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 06-8444 Filed 10-2-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING 

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED 

 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL 

 OF FLORIDA 

 SECOND DISTRICT 

JARMEEL EARL BENNETT, ) 

 ) 

 Appellant, ) 

 ) 

v. ) Case No. 2D13-5360 

 ) 

STATE OF FLORIDA, ) 

 ) 

 Appellee. ) 

 ) 

Opinion filed December 31, 2014. 

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Charlotte 

County; Amy R. Hawthorne, Judge. 

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and 

Marie-Louise Samuels Parmer, Special 

Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for 

Appellant. 

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Donna S. Koch, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee. 

DAVIS, Chief Judge. 

 Jarmeel Bennett challenges his convictions and sentences for burglary 

with a firearm while concealing his identity with a hood or mask and attempted robbery 

with a firearm while concealing his identity with a hood or mask. We affirm without 
- 2 - 

prejudice to Bennett's raising his claims of ineffectiveness of trial counsel as set forth in 

the instant appeal in a timely motion for postconviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of 

Criminal Procedure 3.850. See Derisma v. State, 14 So. 3d 262, 263 (Fla. 4th DCA 

2009). 

 Affirmed. 

WALLACE and CRENSHAW, JJ., Concur.
#### § 665.408 CNMI Annual Catch Limits (ACL) and Annual Catch Targets (ACT).

(a) In accordance with § 665.4, the ACL and ACT for Mariana bottomfish MUS in the CNMI Management Subarea for each fishing year are as follows:

| | 2024 | 2025 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| ACL (lb) | 82,000 | 82,000 |
| ACT (lb) | 75,000 | 75,000 |

Table 1 to Paragraph (a)

(b) If the average catch of the three most recent years exceeds the specified ACL in a fishing year, the Regional Administrator will reduce the ACL and the ACT for the subsequent year by the amount of the overage in a separate rulemaking.

[87 FR 9272, Feb. 18, 2022, as amended at 89 FR 61357, July 31, 2024]
June 10, 2015

Mr. Dominic Smith 14106 Marquesas Way Marina Del Rey, CA 90292

Dear Mr. Smith:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your May 18, 2015, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015- 1757), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson Program Analyst, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
AMENDMENT
TO THE


ARTICLES
OF INCORPORATION OF





MOBILE
NATION, INC.





Mobile
Nation, Inc., a corporation organized and existing under laws of the State of
Nevada (the “Corporation”), does hereby certify that:





I.           The
Board of Directors of the Corporation, at a meeting duly held on July 10, 2008,
has duly adopted resolutions proposing and declaring advisable the following
amendments to the Corporation’s Articles of Incorporation (together, the
“Amendment”):





a.           Article
One is hereby amended to read as follows:




“The name of the Corporation is
AuraSource, Inc.”




b.           Article
Four is hereby amended to read as follows:





“The
Corporation shall be authorized to issue One Hundred and Fifty Million
(150,000,000) shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share.”





II.           That
thereafter, a majority of the outstanding stock entitled to vote thereon, acting
by written consent in accordance with laws of the State of Nevada, approved the
amendment.





III.           That
said amendment was duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of law of the
State of Nevada.








IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this Articles to be signed by Eric
Stoppenhagen, its Chief Financial Officer, this 19 day of August,
2008.











By:




/s/
ERIC STOPPENHAGEN


Name:                      Eric
Stoppenhagen


Title:                      Chief
Financial Officer
Order filed March 13, 2014. 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-13-01145-CV

____________

KATRINA HUDSON, Appellant

V.

SENIOR LIVING PROPERTIES, LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the 412th District Court

Brazoria County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 71927

O R D E R

Appellant’s brief was due March 5, 2014. No brief or motion for extension 

of time has been filed. 

Unless appellant submits a brief to the clerk of this court on or before April 

11, 2014, the court will dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 42.3(b). 

PER CURIAM
#### § 151.2035 Implementation schedule for approved ballast water management methods.

(a) To discharge ballast water into waters of the United States, the master, owner, operator, agent, or person in charge of a vessel subject to [§ 151.2025 of this subpart](/on/2024-09-23/title-33/part-151/section-151.2025) must either ensure that the ballast water meets the ballast water discharge standard as defined in [§ 151.2030(a)](/on/2024-09-23/title-33/section-151.2030#p-151.2030(a)), use an AMS as described in [§ 151.2025(a)(3)](/on/2024-09-23/title-33/section-151.2025#p-151.2025(a)(3)) or ballast exclusively with water from a U.S. public water system, as described in [§ 151.2025(a)(2)](/on/2024-09-23/title-33/section-151.2025#p-151.2025(a)(2)), according to the schedule in [paragraph (b)](/on/2024-09-23/title-33/section-151.2035#p-151.2035(b)) of this section.

(b) *Implementation Schedule for the Ballast Water Management Discharge Standard for vessels using a Coast Guard approved BWMS to manage ballast water discharged to waters of the U.S.* After the dates listed in Table [151.2035(b)](/on/2024-09-23/title-33/section-151.2035#p-151.2035(b)), vessels may use a USCG-approved BWMS and comply with the discharge standard, use PWS per [§ 151.2025(a)(2)](/on/2024-09-23/title-33/section-151.2025#p-151.2025(a)(2)), or use a previously installed AMS per [§ 151.2025(a)(3)](/on/2024-09-23/title-33/section-151.2025#p-151.2025(a)(3)).

Table [151.2035](/on/2024-09-23/title-33/section-151.2035)(b)—Implementation Schedule for Approved Ballast Water Management Methods

| | Vessel's ballast water capacity | Date constructed | Vessel's compliance date |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| New vessels | All | On or after December 1, 2013 | On delivery. |
| Existing vessels | Less than 1500 m3 | Before December 1, 2013 | First scheduled drydocking after January 1, 2016. |
| | 1500-5000 m3 | Before December 1, 2013 | First scheduled drydocking after January 1, 2014. |
| | Greater than 5000 m3 | Before December 1, 2013 | First scheduled drydocking after January 1, 2016. |

[USCG-2001-10486, [77 FR 17306](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/77-FR-17306), Mar. 23, 2012, as amended by USCG-2015-0433, [80 FR 44281](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/80-FR-44281), July 27, 2015]
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 20, 2019

No. 04-19-00212-CR

Sean Leroy HAYS,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 17-0232-CR-A

Honorable William Old, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was originally due on August 23, 2019. On September 

5, 2019, this court notified the court reporter, Terri Robason, that the record was late. On 

September 13, 2019, Ms. Robason filed a notice of late record requesting an extension of time to 

file her volume of the reporter’s record (Volume 7) until September 23, 2019. The request is 

GRANTED. It is ORDERED that Ms. Robason file Volume 7 of the reporter’s record by no later 

than September 23, 2019. 

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 20th day of September, 2019.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
#### § 560.1 Purpose and scope.

This part contains the regulations of the Marine Mammal Commission implementing the Government in the Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b). Consistent with the Act, it is the policy of the Marine Mammal Commission that the public is entitled to the fullest practicable information regarding its decision making processes. The provisions of this part set forth the basic responsibilities of the Commission with regard to this policy and offer guidance to members of the public who wish to exercise the rights established by the Act. These regulations also fulfill the requirement of 5 U.S.C. 552b(g) that each agency subject to the Act promulgate regulations to implement the open meeting requirements of subsections (b) through (f) of section 552b.
#### § 1202.78 How do I accept an alternative amendment?

If your request to amend a record is denied and NARA suggested alternative amendments, and you agree to those alternative amendments, you must notify the Privacy Act Officer who will then make the necessary amendments in accordance with § 1202.74.
BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

In the Matter of ) 

Aspen Lodging Group, LLC d/b/a 

Provenance Hotels ("Provenance"): 

Recommendation to Accept Signed 

Conciliation Agreement 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

MUR 8092 

CERTIFICATION 

I, Vicktoria J. Allen, Deputy Secretary of the Federal Election 

Commission, do hereby certify that on May 23, 2023, the Commission decided 

by a vote of 6-0 to take the following actions in MUR 8092: 

1. Accept the signed conciliation agreement, as recommended in the 

Memorandum to the Commission dated May 10, 2023. 

2. Approve the appropriate letters. 

3. Close the file. 

Commissioners Broussard, Cooksey, Dickerson, Lindenbaum, Trainor, and 

Weintraub voted affirmatively for the decision. 

 Attest: 

 May 24, 2023 

 

Date Vicktoria J. Allen 

 Deputy Secretary of the Commission 

Vicktoria J Allen Digitally signed by Vicktoria J 

Allen 

Date: 2023.05.24 14:28:28 -04'00'

MUR809200099
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5290 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5290

         For the relief of Wade Bomar, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 7, 1994

 Mr. Williams introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         For the relief of Wade Bomar, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RELIEF OF WADE BOMAR.

    The Secretary of the Treasury shall pay, out of any money in the 
Treasury not otherwise appropriated, $100,000 to Mr. Wade Bomar in full 
settlement of a claim for injuries sustained by Mr. Bomar in the line 
of duty on August 6, 1989, while fighting the Pryor Gap fire, 
permanently depriving him of the use of his limbs.
                                 <all>
```
§ 80.91 What is a Federal obligation of funds and how does it occur? An obligation of funds is a legal liability to disburse funds immediately or at a later date as a result of a series of actions. All of these actions must occur to obligate funds for the formula-based grant programs authorized by the Acts: ( a ) The Service sends an annual certificate of apportionment to a State fish and wildlife agency, which tells the agency how much funding is available according to formulas in the Acts.
( b ) The agency sends the Regional Director an application for Federal assistance to use the funds available to it under the Acts and commits to provide the required match to carry out projects that are substantial in character and design.
( c ) The Regional Director notifies the agency that he or she approves the application for Federal assistance and states the terms and conditions of the grant.
( d ) The agency accepts the terms and conditions of the grant in one of the following ways: ( 1 ) Starts work on the grant-funded project by placing an order, entering into a contract, awarding a subgrant, receiving goods or services, or otherwise incurring allowable costs during the grant period that will require payment immediately or in the future;
( 2 ) Draws down funds for an allowable activity under the grant; or
( 3 ) Sends the Regional Director a letter, fax, or e-mail accepting the terms and conditions of the grant.
§ 1222.10 How should agencies apply the statutory definition of Federal records? ( a ) The statutory definition of Federal records is contained in 44 U.S.C. 3301 and provided in § 1220.18 of this subchapter.
( b ) Several key terms, phrases, and concepts in the statutory definition of a Federal record are further explained as follows: ( 1 ) *Documentary materials* has the meaning provided in § 1220.18 of this subchapter.
( 2 ) *Regardless of physical form or characteristics* means that the medium may be paper, film, disk, or other physical type or form; and that the method of recording may be manual, mechanical, photographic, electronic, or any other combination of these or other technologies.
( 3 ) *Made* means the act of creating and recording information by agency personnel in the course of their official duties, regardless of the method(s) or the medium involved.
( 4 ) *Received* means the acceptance or collection of documentary materials by or on behalf of an agency or agency personnel in the course of their official duties regardless of their origin (for example, other units of their agency, private citizens, public officials, other agencies, contractors, Government grantees) and regardless of how transmitted (in person or by messenger, mail, electronic means, or by any other method). In this context, the term does not refer to misdirected materials. It may or may not refer to loaned or seized materials depending on the conditions under which such materials came into agency custody or were used by the agency. Advice of legal counsel should be sought regarding the “record” status of loaned or seized materials.
( 5 ) *Preserved* means the filing, storing, or any other method of systematically maintaining documentary materials in any medium by the agency. This term covers materials not only actually filed or otherwise systematically maintained but also those temporarily removed from existing filing systems.
( 6 ) *Appropriate for preservation* means documentary materials made or received which, in the judgment of the agency, should be filed, stored, or otherwise systematically maintained by an agency because of the evidence of agency activities or information they contain, even if the materials are not covered by its current filing or maintenance procedures.
**Exhibit 12.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Stuart B. James, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Mayne Group Limited; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and we have: 

 

(a) Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) [Omitted in accordance with the guidance of SEC Release No. 33-8238] 

 

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(d)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; 

 

5. Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

(a) All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: November 8, 2004
In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

SUSIE AVCHEN, * No. 14-279V

* Special Master Christian J. Moran 

Petitioner, *

*

v. * Filed: January 22, 2015

*

SECRETARY OF HEALTH *

AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Damages; decision based on proffer;

* influenza (“flu”) vaccine; shoulder

Respondent. * injury related to vaccine

* administration (“SIRVA”).

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

Ronald Craig Homer, Conway Homer et al., Boston, MA, for petitioner;

Alexis S. Babcock, U.S. Dep’t of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

UNPUBLISHED DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1

On April 10, 2014, Susie Avchen filed a petition under the National 

Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, 42 U.S.C. §300 a-10 through 34 (2006), alleging 

that she suffered a shoulder injury related to her receipt of an influenza (“flu”) 

vaccination administered on October 6, 2011. The undersigned ruled that Ms. 

Avchen is entitled to compensation under the Vaccine Act. Ruling, issued on July 

17, 2014. 

On January 20, 2015, respondent filed a Proffer on Award of Compensation, 

to which petitioner agrees. Based upon the record as a whole, the special master 

finds the proffer reasonable and that petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in 

the Proffer. Pursuant to the attached Proffer the court awards petitioner:

 

1

The E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (Dec. 17, 

2002), requires that the Court post this decision on its website. Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 18(b), 

the parties have 14 days to file a motion proposing redaction of medical information or other 

information described in 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(d)(4). Any redactions ordered by the special 

master will appear in the document posted on the website. 
2

A lump sum payment of $85,000.00 which represents all elements of 

compensation to which petitioner would be entitled under 42 U.S.C. § 

300aa-15(a), in the form of a check payable to petitioner, Susie Avchen.

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, 

the clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment herewith. 

Any questions may be directed to my law clerk, Mary Holmes, at (202) 357-

6353.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

s/Christian J. Moran

Christian J. Moran

Special Master