alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
###### Editorial Note on [Part 106](/current/title-21/part-106?toc=1)

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 106 appear at [81 FR 49895](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/81-FR-49895), July 29, 2016.

#### § 106.55 Controls to prevent adulteration from microorganisms.

(a) A manufacturer of infant formula shall establish a system of process controls covering all stages of processing that is designed to ensure that infant formula does not become adulterated due to the presence of microorganisms in the formula or in the processing environment.

(b) A manufacturer of liquid infant formula shall comply, as appropriate, with the procedures specified in [part 113 of this chapter](/on/2024-09-23/title-21/part-113) for thermally processed low-acid foods packaged in hermetically sealed containers and [part 114 of this chapter](/on/2024-09-23/title-21/part-114) for acidified foods.

(c) A manufacturer of powdered infant formula shall test representative samples of each production aggregate of powdered infant formula at the final product stage, before distribution, to ensure that each production aggregate meets the microbiological quality standards in the table in [paragraph (e)](/on/2024-09-23/title-21/section-106.55#p-106.55(e)) of this section.

(d) A manufacturer shall make and retain records, in accordance with [§ 106.100(e)(5)(ii)](/on/2024-09-23/title-21/section-106.100#p-106.100(e)(5)(ii)) and [(f)(7)](/on/2024-09-23/title-21/section-106.100#p-106.100(f)(7)), on the testing of infant formulas for microorganisms.

(e) A powdered infant formula that contains any microorganism that exceeds the M value listed for that microorganism in the table in [paragraph (e)](/on/2024-09-23/title-21/section-106.55#p-106.55(e)) of this section shall be deemed adulterated under sections 402(a)(1), 402(a)(4), and 412(a)(3) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act ([21 U.S.C. 350a(a)(3)](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/21/350a)). The Food and Drug Administration will determine compliance with the M values listed below using the latest edition of the *Bacteriological Analytical Manual* (BAM) (*<http://www.fda.gov/Food/FoodScienceResearch/LaboratoryMethods/BacteriologicalAnalyticalManualBAM/default.htm>*) (accessed April 8, 2013).

| Microorganism | n1 | Sample size | M value |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| *Cronobacter* spp. | 30 | 10 g (grams) | 2 0. |
| *Salmonella* spp. | 60 | 25 g | 2 0. |
| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 Number of samples. | | | |
| 2 None detected. | | | |
# EUR-Lex - 12005SA017 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12005SA017

**Act concerning the conditions of accession of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania and the adjustments to the Treaties on which the European Union is founded - PART TWO:ADJUSTMENTS TO THE TREATIES - TITLE II:OTHER ADJUSTMENTS - Article 17 **

*
Official Journal L 157 , 21/06/2005 P. 0209 - 0210 *

Article 17

Article 299(1) of the EC Treaty shall be replaced by the following:

"1. This Treaty shall apply to the Kingdom of Belgium, the Republic of Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, the Kingdom of Denmark, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Republic of Estonia, the Hellenic Republic, the Kingdom of Spain, the French Republic, Ireland, the Italian Republic, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the Republic of Austria, the Republic of Poland, the Portuguese Republic, Romania, the Republic of Slovenia, the Slovak Republic, the Republic of Finland, the Kingdom of Sweden and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland."

--------------------------------------------------
#### § 1192.2 Equivalent facilitation.

Departures from particular technical and scoping requirements of these guidelines by use of other designs and technologies are permitted where the alternative designs and technologies used will provide substantially equivalent or greater access to and usability of the vehicle. Departures are to be considered on a case-by-case basis by the Department of Transportation under the procedure set forth in 49 CFR 37.7.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-13-00726-CV

Harlingen Consolidated Independent School District

v.

Sara Ann Guardiola

On Appeal from the

County Court at Law No 3 of Cameron County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 2013-CCL-0355

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be DISMISSED. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion. Each party shall bear their own costs 

relating to this appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

March 27, 2014
Home
About
2020 Federal View Point Survey Results
	About DTIC
	Administrator
	Announcements
	Contact Us
	DTIC’s Past and Future
	DTIC Strategic Plan
	Employment
	Sitemap
Products & Services
DTIC’s Products & Services
	DTIC Registration Benefits
	DTIC Combatant Command (CCMD) Classified Reading Room
	Training
Submit Documents
Sign In
Operating Status
 Defense Technical Information Center
				*Search this site, DoD S&T Reports, and more..*

**Internet Explorer Users:** It is recommended that you use the Google Chrome or Microsoft Edge browser for an optimal experience with this application as Microsoft’s support for Internet Explorer is ending.
	DISMISS Fiscal Year 2021 Administration Research & Development Budget Priorities
		September 3, 2019FY2021 White House Budget Priorities
		
			
	
	View Fiscal Year 2021 Administration Research and Development Budget Priorities
 Recent Posts
		DTIC Journal Article Is Published
											April 16, 2021
											DTIC publishes special edition of peer-reviewed scientific journal JDR&E
											November 12, 2020
											CUI marking framework guidance now available.
											November 10, 2020
											EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY: New submission requirements for DoD-funded journal articles
											September 24, 2020
											House Appropriations Committee Report on the Defense Appropriations Act for FY2021
											July 21, 2020 Archives
			April 2021
	November 2020
	September 2020
	July 2020
	February 2020
	January 2020
	December 2019
	September 2019
	August 2019
	June 2019
	April 2019
	March 2019
	February 2019
	January 2019
	September 2018
	August 2018
	July 2018
	January 2018
	February 2017
 **DEFENSE TECHNICAL INFORMATION CENTER**
8725 John J. Kingman Road
Fort Belvoir, Virginia 22060-6218
(800) 225-3842https://Discover.DTIC.mil
			AdministratorContact UsDoD Privacy ProgramEEOEmploymentFOIAInformation Analysis Centers
			Information QualityLegalMission StatementNo FEAR ActOpen GovernmentPlain Language
			Policy MemorandaPrivacy PolicySAPRStrategic PlanSubmit DocumentsUSA.govUSD(R&E)
			LinkedIn

NOTICE:  The appearance of hyperlinks does not constitute endorsement by the DTIC of non-U.S. Government sites or the information, products, or services contained therein.  Although the DTIC may or may not use these sites as additional distribution channels for Department of Defense information, it does not exercise editorial control over all of the information that you may find at these locations.  Such hyperlinks are provided consistent with the stated purpose of this website. The DTIC bears no responsibility for the accuracy, legality or content of the external website or for that of subsequent links. Contact the external website for answers to questions regarding its content. Please let us know about existing external links which you believe are inappropriate.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003

          In connection  with the Annual  Report on Form 10-K of WNC  California
Housing Tax Credits,  L.P. (the "Partnership") for the year ended March 31, 2005
as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the
"Report"),  and  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.,  section  1350,  as adopted  pursuant to
section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2003,  I,  Thomas  J.  Riha,  Chief
Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc., general partner of the Partnership,
hereby certify that:

          1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,  except to the
               extent that such  provisions  requrie the filing of an opinion of
               registiered  public  accountants  to accompany the  Partnership's
               financial statements; and

          2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
               material  respects,   the  financial   condition  and  result  of
               operations of the Partnership.




/s/THOMAS J. RIHA
-----------------
Thomas J. Riha
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.
November 8, 2005
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 5313 Reported in Senate (RS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 747
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 5313

                          [Report No. 118-327]

 To improve section 406 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and 
                       Emergency Assistance Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 13, 2024

Mr. Blumenthal introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

            December 19 (legislative day, December 16), 2024

               Reported by Mr. Peters, with an amendment
                  [Insert the part printed in italic]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To improve section 406 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and 
                       Emergency Assistance Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Rebuilding with Resilience Act''.

SEC. 2. REPAIR, RESTORATION, AND REPLACEMENT OF DAMAGED FACILITIES.

    Section 406(a) of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and 
Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5172(a)) is amended by adding at 
the end the following:
            ``(5) Reduction of risk.--The President shall collaborate 
        with States and Indian tribal governments receiving a 
        contribution under this section to ensure that, to the maximum 
        extent practicable, repair, restoration, reconstruction, or 
        replacement completed with that contribution substantially 
        reduces the risk of, or increases resilience to, future damage, 
        hardship, loss, or suffering.''.

SEC. 3. NONDISCRIMINATION IN DISASTER ASSISTANCE.

    Section 308(a) of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and 
Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5151(a)) is amended by striking 
``or economic status'' and inserting ``economic status, or political 
affiliation''.
                                                       Calendar No. 747

118th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 5313

                          [Report No. 118-327]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To improve section 406 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and 
                       Emergency Assistance Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

            December 19 (legislative day, December 16), 2024

                       Reported with an amendment
```
#### Eleonore Butschkowski, appellant, v. William Brecks, appellee.

Filed May 17, 1913.

No. 16,632.

Appeal from tlie district court for Frontier county: Robert O. Orr, Judge. *Motion to revive sustained.*

*8. L. Geisthardt,*for appellant.

*W. 8. Morían*and *Lambe & Butler, contra.*

Per Ouriam.

A, a citizen of the United States and resident of this state, died intestate, being' the owner of real estate and personal property therein. He left -no wife nor child, father nor mother, surviving him. His only near relatives' at the time of his decease was a brother, also a citizen and resident of this state, and a married sister in Germany, who had no children. Administration was granted upon the estate of A in Frontier county. The sister brought suit in the county, where the real estate of deceased was situated, for a partition thereof, alleging her heirship equally with the surviving brother. He answered, admitting the relationship, but denying her right to inherit the land, as she was a nonresident alien. The cause was submitted to the district court upon the pleadings, ■viien a judgment was rendered in favor of defendant, plaintiff’s petition dismissed, and defendant’s title to the whole of the land quieted. She appealed to this court. Pending the appeal here she died. Some time pribr to her decease she is alleged to have entered into a written agreement with her husband, providing that, in case of' her decease, leaving him surviving, he should become the owner of all her property. He now moves the court for an order of revivor, substituting himself as plaintiff anj appellant in place and stead of his deceased wife. It is ordered that he be so substituted, but that this order shall *605in no sense be an adjudication of the rights of any one, but that the whole question of his rights, or the absence thereof, be reserved to the final decision of the cause.

The motion to revive is, to that extent, sustained.

Motion sustained.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R.

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 96-31209

Summary Calendar

_____________________

BILLY SINCLAIR,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

KELLY WARD, Warden,

Defendant-Appellee.

_______________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for

the Western District of Louisiana

(95-CV-896)

_______________________________________________________

June 26, 1997

Before REAVLEY, BARKSDALE and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Billy Sinclair argues that the district court erred in

dismissing his complaint as frivolous. Sinclair alleged that his

temporary placement as a protected inmate in a disciplinary

detention unit deprived him of his liberty interest in his

classification status and the privileges accompanying that

status. Sinclair also alleged that his placement in that unit
2

for an extended lockdown constituted the imposition of cruel and

unusual punishment and violated his right to equal protection. 

Sinclair also alleged that the defendant warden retaliated

against him by assigning him a farm line job because he exercised

his right of access to the courts and his right to file

complaints against prison officials and employees.

Although appellant did not proceed in forma pauperis, under

the provisions of the 1996 Prison Litigation Reform Act, the

district court correctly determined that Sinclair’s complaint was

frivolous. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i).

Sinclair’s temporary assignment to a detention unit usually

reserved for discipinary violations, his assignment to a

different prison job, or termination of trusty status do not

implicate protected liberty interests. Sandin v. Connor,

__U.S.__, 115 S.Ct. 2293, 2301, 132 L.Ed.2d 418 (1995). See also

Meachum v. Fano, 427 U.S. 215, 228 (1976). Additionally, as

Sinclair has failed to allege or demonstrate that his position as

a litigant has been prejudiced by being denied access to a law

library or not being allowed to purchase a typewriter while in

lockdown, he has not shown that his constitutional right of

access to the courts has been violated. Eason v. Thaler, 73 F.3d

1322 (5th Cir. 1996).

 Sinclair argues for the first time on appeal that he was

subjected to on-the-job harassment, monitoring of mail and
3

telephone calls in retaliation for his filing complaints

concerning wrongdoing in the prison. Because Sinclair failed to

raise these claims properly in the district court, these issues

must be reviewed for plain error only. See United States v.

Calverley, 37 F.3d 160, 162-164 (1994)(en banc). Sinclair’s

allegations and the responses to his administrative complaint do

not raise an inference of a retaliatory motive, and these claims

require the resolution of factual issues which do not rise to the

level of plain error. Thus these issues are not subject to

review.

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       1,183,613
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  225,859
<ALLOWANCES>                                    57,500
<INVENTORY>                                    462,097
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,111,212
<PP&E>                                         718,966
<DEPRECIATION>                                 637,651
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,069,151
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,367,318
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          3
<COMMON>                                        13,544
<OTHER-SE>                                     115,048
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,069,151
<SALES>                                        575,643
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               579,533
<CGS>                                          419,263
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  420,838
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,359,387
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             313,914
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,625,116)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,625,116)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,808,529)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.34)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.34)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 11

                             THE QUIGLEY CORPORATION
                    Computation of Earnings (Loss) Per Share

         Net loss per  common  share is  computed  by  dividing  net loss by the
weighted  average number of shares of common stock and common stock  equivalents
outstanding  during each year. As the Company sustained loses in all periods set
forth below, the inclusion of common stock equivalents would be anti-dilutive in
nature and are not included in the per share calculations.

                        FOR THE YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
                        --------------------------------


                                    1996               1995            1994
                                    ----               ----            ----

Earnings (Loss) per
Share:

Net Loss before
cummulative effect
adjustment                        $(694,269)         $(152,556)     $(95,348)

Cumulative effect
adjustment                                _                  _        21,564
                                  ---------          ---------      --------


Net Income (loss)                 $(694,269)         $(152,556)     $(73,784)
                                  ==========         ==========     =========


Weighted average
number of shares
outstanding                       4,065,589          3,143,245     2,685,301
                                  ---------          ---------     ---------


Assumed issuances
under exercise of
stock options and
warrants                                  -(1)               -(1)          -(1)

Loss per share before
cummulative effect
adjustment                           $ (.17)             $(.05)      $  (.04)

Cumulative effect
adjustment                                _                  _           .01
                                     ------              ------      --------

Loss per share                       $ (.17)             $(.05)      $  (.03)
                                     ======              ======      =========

(1)      Common stock equivalents outstanding in 1994, 1995 and 1996 were anti-
         dilutive and therefore not included.
# EUR-Lex - 12007L/AFI/DCL/31 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12007L/AFI/DCL/31

**Treaty of Lisbon amending the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Community, signed at Lisbon, 13 December 2007 - A. Declarations concerning provisions of the Treaties - 31. Declaration on Article 140 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union **

*
Official Journal 306 , 17/12/2007 P. 0260 - 0260 *

31. Declaration on Article 140 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

The Conference confirms that the policies described in Article 140 fall essentially within the competence of the Member States. Measures to provide encouragement and promote coordination to be taken at Union level in accordance with this Article shall be of a complementary nature. They shall serve to strengthen cooperation between Member States and not to harmonise national systems. The guarantees and practices existing in each Member State as regards the responsibility of the social partners will not be affected.

This Declaration is without prejudice to the provisions of the Treaties conferring competence on the Union, including in social matters.

--------------------------------------------------
#### § 1915.1009 beta-Naphthylamine.

Note:

The requirements applicable to shipyard employment under this section are identical to those set forth at [§ 1910.1003 of this chapter](/on/2024-09-23/title-29/section-1910.1003).

[[61 FR 31430](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/61-FR-31430), June 20, 1996]