alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

130 

CAF 15-01276 

PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., PERADOTTO, CARNI, LINDLEY, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ. 

 

IN THE MATTER OF MADISON J.S., TYLER D.S., 

BENTLEY P.S., AND BROOKE R.S. 

--------------------------------------------- MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

STEUBEN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, 

PETITIONER-APPELLANT; 

 

VICTORIA M. AND JASON W., 

RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS.

CASEY E. ROGERS, BATH, FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT.

SALLY A. MADIGAN, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILDREN, BATH.

 

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Steuben County (Joseph

W. Latham, J.), entered July 27, 2015 in a proceeding pursuant to

Family Court Act article 10. The order, insofar as appealed from,

dismissed the petition insofar as it alleged that Madison J.S., Tyler

D.S. and Brooke R.S. were derivatively neglected by respondents. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed without costs.

 Memorandum: Petitioner appeals from an order that, insofar as

appealed from, dismissed its petition to the extent that it alleged

that Madison J.S., Tyler D.S., and Brooke R.S. (the subject children)

were derivatively neglected by respondents. We affirm. Although

Family Court determined that respondents neglected Bentley P.S., a

sibling of the subject children, and Family Court Act § 1046 (a) (i)

permits evidence of that neglect to be considered in determining

whether the subject children were neglected, “the statute does not

mandate a finding of derivative neglect” (Matter of Jocelyne J., 8

AD3d 978, 979), and “such evidence typically may not serve as the sole

basis of a finding of neglect” (Matter of Evelyn B., 30 AD3d 913, 914,

lv denied 7 NY3d 713). Because there is no evidence in the record

that the “neglect was repeated . . . [or] was perpetrated on multiple

victims,” and it is unclear whether the subject children “were nearby

when the [neglect] occurred” (Matter of Cadejah AA., 33 AD3d 1155,

1157), we conclude that the court did not err in refusing to make a

finding of derivative neglect. 

Entered: February 11, 2016 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1429/2005

of 31 August 2005         

establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 of 21 December 1994 on detailed rules for the application of the import arrangements for fruit and vegetables (1), and in particular Article 4(1) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The standard import values referred to in Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 shall be fixed as indicated in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 1 September 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 31 August 2005.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

----

(1)OJ L 337, 24.12.1994, p. 66. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1947/2002 (OJ L 299, 1.11.2002, p. 17).

----

ANNEX

to Commission Regulation of 31 August 2005 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

----

(1)  Country nomenclature as fixed by Commission Regulation (EC) No 750/2005 (OJ L 126, 19.5.2005, p. 12). Code ‘            999            ’ stands for ‘of other origin’.

----
# EUR-Lex - 11992M/PRO/SEBC/44 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11992M/PRO/SEBC/44

**Treaty on European Union - Protocol on the statute of the european system of central banks and of the European Central Bank - Chapter IX: Transitional and other provisions for the ESCB - Article 44: Transitional tasks of the ECB **

*
Official Journal C 191 , 29/07/1992 P. 0077 *

Article 44

Transitional tasks of the ECB

The ECB shall take over those tasks of the EMI which, because of the derogations of one or more Member States, still have to be performed in the third stage.

The ECB shall give advice in the preparations for the abrogation of the derogations specified in Article 109k of this Treaty.
# EUR-Lex - 12004V329 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V329

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART III — THE POLICIES AND FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - TITLE V — THE UNION'S EXTERNAL ACTION - CHAPTER VIII — IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SOLIDARITY CLAUSE - Article III-329 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0149 - 0150 *

Article III-329

1. Should a Member State be the object of a terrorist attack or the victim of a natural or man-made disaster, the other Member States shall assist it at the request of its political authorities. To that end, the Member States shall coordinate between themselves in the Council.

2. The arrangements for the implementation by the Union of the solidarity clause referred to in Article I-43 shall be defined by a European decision adopted by the Council acting on a joint proposal by the Commission and the Union Minister for Foreign Affairs. The Council shall act in accordance with Article III-300(1) where this decision has defence implications. The European Parliament shall be informed.

For the purposes of this paragraph and without prejudice to Article III-344, the Council shall be assisted by the Political and Security Committee with the support of the structures developed in the context of the common security and defence policy and by the Committee referred to in Article III-261; the two committees shall, if necessary, submit joint opinions.

3. The European Council shall regularly assess the threats facing the Union in order to enable the Union and its Member States to take effective action.

--------------------------------------------------
Document

EXHIBIT 10.43

May 4, 2020
Johanna Mercier
Dear Johanna,
This letter agreement is entered into between Gilead Sciences, Inc. (“Gilead”) and you to confirm the extension of certain relocation assistance benefits provided to you pursuant to the Offer Letter between you and Gilead dated May 21, 2019 (the “Offer Letter”).
Pursuant to the Offer Letter, Gilead agreed to provide you with up to 12 months of temporary accommodations in a fully furnished corporate apartment. The initial 12-month term of your temporary accommodations is set to expire on July 10, 2020. Subject to your execution of this letter agreement, Gilead agrees to provide a one-time cash payment to you in an amount of $350,000 to help cover your anticipated costs in extending your temporary accommodations for an additional 12 months (the “Extended Temporary Housing Payment”). Your Extended Temporary Housing Payment will be paid to you in one lump sum, net of all applicable taxes, no later than July 31, 2020.
If your employment should terminate within one year following the date on which you receive the Extended Temporary Housing Payment, the full, gross cash amount of the Extended Temporary Housing Payment must be repaid to Gilead within 90 days after your last date of employment, except that you will have no such repayment obligation if your employment is terminated by Gilead without Cause (as defined in the Gilead Sciences, Inc. 2004 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended) or by you for Good Reason (as defined in the Offer Letter).
You agree by signing below that Gilead has made no other promises with regard to the matters discussed herein other than what is outlined in this letter. In case of any conflict between this letter and the terms of any other letter or agreement, this letter will be controlling. This agreement can only be modified by written agreement signed by you and Gilead’s representative.
Please execute this letter agreement where indicated below and return a copy to Gilead to evidence your agreement. I look forward to continuing our work on the organization’s short and long-term success.


Sincerely,
/s/ Daniel O’Day
Daniel O’Day
CEO and Chairman
Foregoing terms and conditions hereby accepted:
Signature:   /s/ Johanna Mercier                            
Name:               Johanna Mercier                            
Date:                 May 8th 2020
# EUR-Lex - 12004V348 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V348

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART III — THE POLICIES AND FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - TITLE VI — THE FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - CHAPTER I — PROVISIONS GOVERNING THE INSTITUTIONS - Section 1 — The institutions - Subsection 4 — The European Commission - Article III-348 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0155 - 0155 *

Article III-348

1. Apart from normal replacement, or death, the duties of a member of the Commission shall end when he or she resigns or is compulsorily retired.

2. A vacancy caused by resignation, compulsory retirement or death shall be filled for the remainder of the member's term of office by a new member of the same nationality appointed by the Council, by common accord with the President of the Commission, after consulting the European Parliament and in accordance with the criteria set out in Article I-26(4).

The Council may, acting unanimously on a proposal from the President of the Commission, decide that such a vacancy need not be filled, in particular when the remainder of the member's term of office is short.

3. In the event of resignation, compulsory retirement or death, the President shall be replaced for the remainder of his or her term of office in accordance with Article I-27(1).

4. In the event of resignation, compulsory retirement or death, the Union Minister for Foreign Affairs shall be replaced, for the remainder of his or her term of office, in accordance with Article I-28(1).

5. In the case of the resignation of all the members of the Commission, they shall remain in office and continue to deal with current business until they have been replaced, for the remainder of their term of office, in accordance with Articles I-26 and I-27.

--------------------------------------------------
# EUR-Lex - 11985I056 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11985I056

**DOCUMENTS CONCERNING THE ACCESSION OF THE KINGDOM OF SPAIN AND THE PORTUGUESE REPUBLIC TO THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, ACT CONCERNING THE CONDITIONS OF ACCESSION OF THE KINGDOM OF SPAIN AND THE PORTUGUESE REPUBLIC AND THE ADJUSTMENTS TO THE TREATIES, ARTICLE 56 **

*
Official Journal L 302 , 15/11/1985 P. 0035 *

++++

Article 56

1 . Articles 1 to 6 of Regulation ( EEC ) No 1612/68 on the freedom of movement of workers within the Community shall apply in Spain with regard to nationals of the other Member States and in the other Member States with regard to Spanish nationals , only as from 1 January 1993 .

The Kingdom of Spain and the other Member States may maintain in force until 31 December 1992 , with regard to nationals of the other Member States and to Spanish nationals respectively , national provisions , or those resulting from bilateral arrangements , making prior authorization a requirement for immigration with a view to pursuing an activity as an employed person and/or taking up paid employment .

However the Kingdom of Spain and the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg may maintain in force until 31 December 1995 the national provisions referred to in the preceding subparagraph with regard to Luxembourg nationals and Spanish nationals respectively .

2 . As from 1 January 1991 the Council shall , after receiving a report from the Commission , examine the results of the application of the measures of derogation referred to in paragraph 1 .

On completion of this examination , the Council , acting unanimously on a proposal from the Commission may , on the basis of new data , adopt provisions intended to adjust the said measures .
Case 16-26657 Doc 4 Filed 08/19/16 Entered 08/19/16 11:24:00 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2
Case 16-26657 Doc 4 Filed 08/19/16 Entered 08/19/16 11:24:00 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 13

- 00092

- CR

Giles Altman Jenerette

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From the 371st District Court

o f Tarr ant County (1185638D )

June 13, 2013

P er C uriam

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

the appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal i s dismiss ed for

want of jurisdiction

.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

PER CURIAM
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                      0001084031
<NAME>                     CORONADO EXPLORATIONS LTD.
<MULTIPLIER>                                         1
<CURRENCY>                                  US DOLLARS

<S>                                <C>           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     9-MOS             9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>           JAN-01-2001       JAN-01-2001
<PERIOD-START>              FEB-01-2000       FEB-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                OCT-31-2000       OCT-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                      11                11
<CASH>                                0                 0
<SECURITIES>                          0                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                         0                 0
<ALLOWANCES>                          0                 0
<INVENTORY>                           0                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     11                 0
<PP&E>                                0                 0
<DEPRECIATION>                        0                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       11                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>            18,448                 0
<BONDS>                               0                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0                 0
<PREFERRED>                           0                 0
<COMMON>                            250                 0
<OTHER-SE>                     (18,687)                 0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         11                 0
<SALES>                               0                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      0                 0
<CGS>                                 0                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         0                 0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                 15,263            17,976
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      0                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    0                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       0                 0
<INCOME-TAX>                          0                 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   0                 0
<DISCONTINUED>                        0                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       0                 0
<CHANGES>                             0                 0
<NET-INCOME>                   (15,263)          (17,976)
<EPS-BASIC>                           0                 0
<EPS-DILUTED>                         0                 0


</TABLE>
###### Editorial Note on Part 648

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 648 appear at 62 FR 14651, Mar. 27, 1997.

#### §§ 648.237-648.238 [Reserved]
#### § 665.660 PRIA precious coral fisheries. [Reserved]
Exhibit 32

Certificate Pursuant to

           18 U.S.C. Sections 1350,
           As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NetWolves Corporation (the "Company")
on Form  10-QSB  for the  quarter  ending  March  31,  2008 as  filed  with  the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Scott
Foote, Chief Executive Officer, President and Director,  certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date: May 15, 2008
                                /s/ Scott Foote
                                ----------------------------------------------
                                Scott Foote
                                Chief Executive Officer, President and Director


Certificate Pursuant to

           18 U.S.C. Sections 1350,
           As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NetWolves Corporation (the "Company")
on Form  10-QSB  for the  quarter  ending  March  31,  2008 as  filed  with  the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Peter
C. Castle, Chief Financial Officer, Vice President-Finance,  Director, Treasurer
and Secretary of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  1350, as adopted
pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date: May 15, 2008
                                /s/ Peter C. Castle
                                ---------------------------------------------
                                Peter C. Castle
                                Chief Financial Officer, Vice President-Finance,
                                Director, Treasurer and Secretary
September 24, 2009

Mr. William C. Early (3RAOO) RFFJVED Acting Regional Administrator - U. S. Environmental Protection Agency OCT 7 2I’9 Region II

1650 Arch Street Dvisic, -

Philadelphia, PA 19103

I am pleased to submit the enclosed revision to the State of Delaware State

implementation Plan (SIP) for the Attainment and Maintenance ofthe National Ambient Air

Quality Standards for Ozone and Fine Particulate Matter. The revision is an amendment to 7 DE

Admin. Code 1146- ELECTRIC GENERATING UNIT (EGU) MULTI-POLLUTANT

REGULATION. 7 DE Admin. Code 1146 was originally promulgated in November 2006 (thenRegulation No. 1146 of the State of Delaware Regulations Governing the Control of AirPollution) and was submitted to the EPA as a SIP revision on November 16, 2006. This revision

modifies the SO2 mass emissions limit associated with Conectiv Edge Moor Unit 5 (asconstrained in 1146’s Table 5-1) from 2427 tons per year to 4600 tons per year, beginning incalendar year 2009. No other changes to 1146 have been made, including no change to the

existing requirement for Unit 5 to burn only low sulfur oil. The effective date ofthe revision isOctober 10, 2009.

The requirements of the CAA Section 11 0(a)(2)(A) have been met through the normal

public hearing process established by the State of Delaware with proper notification (30 days)prior to the convening of the public hearing. The aforementioned document was made available

for public review and comment beginning on April 26, 2009, and a public hearing was held on

May 26, 2009. Attachments A and B are copies of affidavits as proof of proper notification. It is

the position ofthe State of Delaware that all minimum requirements set forth in the 1990 CleanAir Act Amendments have been met.

Ve€4414ze 4 7tai’aede4 oaf
, 

y

y q

g 

e

c

osed documents.

Sincerely,

Collin P. O’Mara

Secretary

cc: Diane Esher, EPA w/encl.

Ali Mirzakhalili
# EUR-Lex - 12002E174 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 12002E174

**Treaty establishing the European Community (Nice consolidated version) - Part Three: Community policies - Title XIX: Environment - Article 174 - Article 130r - EC Treaty (Maastricht consolidated version) - **

*
Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0107 - 0108 Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0254 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0052 - Consolidated version *

Treaty establishing the European Community (Nice consolidated version)

Part Three: Community policies

Title XIX: Environment

Article 174

Article 130r - EC Treaty (Maastricht consolidated version)

Article 174

1. Community policy on the environment shall contribute to pursuit of the following objectives:

- preserving, protecting and improving the quality of the environment,

- protecting human health,

- prudent and rational utilisation of natural resources,

- promoting measures at international level to deal with regional or worldwide environmental problems.

2. Community policy on the environment shall aim at a high level of protection taking into account the diversity of situations in the various regions of the Community. It shall be based on the precautionary principle and on the principles that preventive action should be taken, that environmental damage should as a priority be rectified at source and that the polluter should pay.

In this context, harmonisation measures answering environmental protection requirements shall include, where appropriate, a safeguard clause allowing Member States to take provisional measures, for non-economic environmental reasons, subject to a Community inspection procedure.

3. In preparing its policy on the environment, the Community shall take account of:

- available scientific and technical data,

- environmental conditions in the various regions of the Community,

- the potential benefits and costs of action or lack of action,

- the economic and social development of the Community as a whole and the balanced development of its regions.

4. Within their respective spheres of competence, the Community and the Member States shall cooperate with third countries and with the competent international organisations. The arrangements for Community cooperation may be the subject of agreements between the Community and the third parties concerned, which shall be negotiated and concluded in accordance with Article 300.

The previous subparagraph shall be without prejudice to Member States' competence to negotiate in international bodies and to conclude international agreements.
#### § 1154.149 Program accessibility: Discrimination prohibited.

Except as otherwise provided in § 1154.150, no qualified handicapped person shall, because the agency's facilities are inaccessible to or unusable by handicapped persons, be denied the benefits of, be excluded from participation in, or otherwise be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity conducted by the agency.
# EUR-Lex - 12002E080 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 12002E080

**Treaty establishing the European Community (Nice consolidated version) - Part Three: Community policies - Title V: Transport - Article 80 - Article 84 - EC Treaty (Maastricht consolidated version) - Article 84 - EEC Treaty **

*
Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0064 - 0064 Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0207 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0028 - Consolidated version (EEC Treaty - no official publication available) *

Treaty establishing the European Community (Nice consolidated version)

Part Three: Community policies

Title V: Transport

Article 80

Article 84 - EC Treaty (Maastricht consolidated version)

Article 84 - EEC Treaty

Article 80

1. The provisions of this title shall apply to transport by rail, road and inland waterway.

2. The Council may, acting by a qualified majority, decide whether, to what extent and by what procedure appropriate provisions may be laid down for sea and air transport.

The procedural provisions of Article 71 shall apply.