alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EUR-Lex - 12004V414 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V414

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART III — THE POLICIES AND FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - TITLE VI — THE FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - CHAPTER II — FINANCIAL PROVISIONS - Section 4 — Common provisions - Article III-414 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0179 - 0179 *

Article III-414

Regular meetings between the Presidents of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission shall be convened, on the initiative of the Commission, under the budgetary procedures referred to in this Chapter. The Presidents shall take all the necessary steps to promote consultation and the reconciliation of the positions of the institutions over which they preside in order to facilitate the implementation of this Chapter.

--------------------------------------------------
#### § 218.71 Effective dates.

Regulations in this subpart are effective from July 10, 2020, through December 20, 2025.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Immunicon Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Edward L. Erickson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ EDWARD L. ERICKSON 
|Edward L. Erickson     
|Chief Executive Officer
|August 11, 2005
§ 86.91 May an operator of a BIG-funded facility increase or decrease user fees during its useful life? ( a ) An operator of a BIG-funded facility may increase or decrease user fees during its useful life without our prior approval if they are consistent with prevailing market rates. The grantee may impose separate restrictions on an operator or subgrantee.
( b ) If the grantee or we discover that fees charged by the operator of a BIG-funded facility do not follow § 86.90 and the facility unfairly competes with other marinas or makes excessive profits, the grantee must notify the operator in writing. The operator must respond to the notice in writing, and either justify or correct the fee schedule. If the operator justifies the fee schedule, the grantee and we must allow reasonable business decisions and only call for a change in the fee schedule if the operator is unable to show that the increase or decrease is reasonable.
BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

In the Matter of )

Harley Rouda and Harley Rouda for 

Congress

)

)

)

AO 2022-15

Agenda Document No. 22-39-A

CERTIFICATION

I, Vicktoria J. Allen, recording secretary for the Federal Election Commission open 

meeting on August 31, 2022, do hereby certify that the Commission decided by a vote of 5-0 to 

approve Agenda Document No. 22-39-A, which is Draft A.

Commissioners Broussard, Cooksey, Dickerson, Trainor, and Weintraub voted 

affirmatively for the decision. Commissioner Lindenbaum was recused and did not vote.

Attest:

 September 1, 2022

Date Vicktoria J. Allen

Acting Deputy Secretary of the 

Commission
#### §§ 665.229-665.239 [Reserved]
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-1982
WILLIAM B. MATTINGLY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus REBECCA A. BETTS, Defendant - Appellee, and
DONALDSON MINING COMPANY; KELLY'S CREEK AND NORTHWESTERN RAILROAD, a corporation; VALLEY CAMP COAL COMPANY; DAVID LUNG; JACK WOODY; JAMES BOGGESS; KEVIN SPAULDING; JAMES L. LITMAN; HASTING CONSTRUCTION, INCORPORATED;JOHN HASTING; RENEGADE EQUIPMENT, INCORPORATED; JOSEPH FARRIS; KING, BETTS & ALLEN, a professional partnership; STEPHEN B. FARMER, Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Charles H. Haden II, Chief District Judge. (CA-95-949-2) Submitted: January 23, 1997 Decided: January 29, 1997 Before RUSSELL, WILKINS, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.23 William E. Mattingly, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Michael Horn, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief in his action pursuant to 18 U.S.C.A. §§ 1961-1968 (West 1984 & Supp. 1996), the Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinionaccepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Mattingly v. Betts , No. CA-95-949-2 (S.D.W. Va. June 26, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# EUR-Lex - 12005SP022 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12005SP022

**Protocol concerning the conditions and arrangements for admission of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania to the European Union - PART FOUR:TEMPORARY PROVISIONS - TITLE II:INSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS - Article 22 **

*
Official Journal L 157 , 21/06/2005 P. 0035 - 0036 *

Article 22

1. In Article 2(2), second subparagraph, of Protocol No 34 on the transitional provisions relating to the institutions and bodies of the Union, annexed to the Constitution and to the EAEC Treaty, the following shall be inserted between the entries for Belgium and the Czech Republic:

"Bulgaria 10"

and, between the entries for Portugal and Slovenia:

"Romania 14".

2. Article 2(2), third subparagraph, of Protocol No 34 on the transitional provisions relating to the institutions and bodies of the Union, annexed to the Constitution and to the EAEC Treaty, shall be replaced by the following:

"Acts shall be adopted if there are at least 255 votes in favour representing a majority of the members where, under the Constitution, they must be adopted on a proposal from the Commission. In other cases decisions shall be adopted if there are at least 255 votes in favour representing at least two thirds of the members.".

--------------------------------------------------
#### § 153.203 Procedure for the notice of discharge.

Any person in charge of a vessel or of an onshore or offshore facility shall, as soon as they have knowledge of any discharge of oil or a hazardous substance from such vessel or facility in violation of section 311(b)(3) of the Act, immediately notify the Commandant (CG-MER-3), Attn: Industry and Interagency Coordination Division, U.S. Coast Guard Stop 7516, 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20593-7516, *toll free telephone number*: 800-424-8802, *direct telephone:* 202-267-2675, *or Fax:* 202-267-1322. If direct reporting to the NRC is not practicable, reports may be made to the Coast Guard or EPA predesignated OSC for the geographic area where the discharge occurs. All such reports shall be promptly relayed to the NRC. If it is not possible to notify the NRC or the predesignated OSC immediately, reports may be made immediately to the nearest Coast Guard unit, provided that the person in charge of the vessel or onshore or offshore facility notifies the NRC as soon as possible. A report made under this section satisfies the reporting requirements of [§ 151.15 of this chapter](/on/2024-09-23/title-33/section-151.15) and of [46 CFR 4.05-1](/on/2024-09-23/title-46/section-4.05-1), if required under that provision.

Note:

Geographical jurisdiction of Coast Guard and EPA OSC's are specified in the applicable Regional Contingency Plan. Regional Contingency Plans are available at Coast Guard District Offices and EPA Regional Offices as indicated in Table 2. Addresses and telephone numbers for these offices are listed in Table 1.

[CGD 84-067, [51 FR 17966](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/51-FR-17966), May 16, 1986, as amended by CGD 88-052, [53 FR 25121](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/53-FR-25121), July 1, 1988; USCG-2000-6927, [70 FR 74675](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/70-FR-74675), Dec. 16, 2005; USCG-2006-25150, [71 FR 39209](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/71-FR-39209), July 12, 2006; USCG-2008-0179, [73 FR 35014](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/73-FR-35014), June 19, 2008; USCG-2010-0351, [75 FR 36284](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/75-FR-36284), June 25, 2010; USCG-2014-0410, [79 FR 38435](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/79-FR-38435), July 7, 2014]
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1681/2005

of 14 October 2005         

fixing the minimum selling prices for butter for the 172nd individual invitation to tender under the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 2571/97

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products (1), and in particular Article 10 thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The minimum selling prices of butter from intervention stocks and processing securities applying for the 172nd individual invitation to tender, under the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 2571/97, shall be fixed as indicated in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 15 October 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 14 October 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 48. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 186/2004 (OJ L 29, 3.2.2004, p. 6).

(2)OJ L 350, 20.12.1997, p. 3. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2250/2004 (OJ L 381, 28.12.2004, p. 25).

----

ANNEX

to the Commission Regulation of 14 October 2005 fixing the minimum selling prices for butter for the 172nd individual invitation to tender under the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 2571/97

----
EXHIBIT
31.1




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER




I, Ian R.
McNeil, certify that:




1.  I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Searchlight Minerals
Corp.;




2.  Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.  Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;




4.  The
registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:




(a)  Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;





(b)  Evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and




(c)  Disclosed
in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and





5.  The
registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):




(a)  All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and




(b)  Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.





SEARCHLIGHT
      MINERALS CORP.Date:  July
      6, 2009
            By:
            /s/ IAN R. MCNEILIan
      R. McNeilChief
      Executive Officer
# Map            Finland.
#### § 80.907 Principal operating position.

The principal operating position of the radiotelephone installation on vessels over 100 gross tons must be in the room from which the vessel is normally steered while at sea. If the station can be operated from any location other than the principal operating position, a positive means must be provided at the principal operating position to take full control of the station.
§ 1150.102 Decision. ( a ) The judge shall issue a decision within thirty (30) days after the hearing ends or, when the parties submit posthearing briefs, within thirty (30) days after the filing of the briefs.
( b ) The decision shall contain ( 1 ) all findings of fact and conclusions of law regarding all material issues of fact and law presented in the record,
( 2 ) the reasons for each finding of fact and conclusion of law, and
( 3 ) other provisions which effectuate the purposes of the Architectural Barriers Act and section 502 of the Rehabilitation Act. The decision may direct the parties to take specific action or may order the suspension or withholding of Federal funds.
( c ) The decision shall be served on all parties and participants to the proceedings.
# EUR-Lex - 12004V064 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V064

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART II — THE CHARTER OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THE UNION - TITLE I — DIGNITY - Article II-64 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0042 - 0042 *

Article II-64

Prohibition of torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment

No one shall be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.

--------------------------------------------------
#### §§ 665.410-665.419 [Reserved]
Opinion issued March 10, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-14-00961-CV

———————————

CEDELL GARRETT, Appellant

V.

FREO TEXAS, LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 4

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 1053782

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Cedell Garrett, has neither paid the required fees nor established 

indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1; see also

TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.208, 51.941(a), 101.041 (West 2013), 

§ 101.0411 (West Supp. 2014); Order Regarding Fees Charged in the Supreme 
2

Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on

Multi-District Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 13-9127 (Tex. Aug. 16, 2013). After 

being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not 

adequately respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 42.3(c).

We dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees. We dismiss any 

pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Brown and Lloyd.
Editorial Note on Part 622
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 622 appear at 79 FR 57837, Sept. 26, 2014 and at 81 FR 32253, May 23, 2016.

§ 622.412 Adjustment of management measures. In accordance with the framework procedures of the Fishery Management Plan for the Spiny Lobster Fishery of the Gulf of Mexico and South Atlantic, the RA may establish or modify the following items: ( a ) Reporting and monitoring requirements, permitting requirements, bag and possession limits, size limits, vessel trip limits, closed seasons, closed areas, reopening of sectors that have been prematurely closed, annual catch limits (ACLs), annual catch targets (ACTs), quotas, accountability measures (AMs), maximum sustainable yield (or proxy), optimum yield, total allowable catch (TAC), management parameters such as overfished and overfishing definitions, gear restrictions, gear markings and identification, vessel identification requirements, acceptable biological catch (ABC) and ABC control rule, rebuilding plans, and restrictions relative to conditions of harvested fish (such as tailing lobster, undersized attractants, and use as bait).
( b ) [Reserved]
[78 FR 22952, Apr. 17, 2013, as amended at 84 FR 37152, July 31, 2019]
# EUR-Lex - 12002E061 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 12002E061

**Treaty establishing the European Community (Nice consolidated version) - Part Three: Community policies - Title IV: Visas, asylum, immigration and other policies related to free movement of persons - Article 61 **

*
Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0057 - 0058 Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0200 - Consolidated version *

Treaty establishing the European Community (Nice consolidated version)

Part Three: Community policies

Title IV: Visas, asylum, immigration and other policies related to free movement of persons

Article 61

Article 61

In order to establish progressively an area of freedom, security and justice, the Council shall adopt:

(a) within a period of five years after the entry into force of the Treaty of Amsterdam, measures aimed at ensuring the free movement of persons in accordance with Article 14, in conjunction with directly related flanking measures with respect to external border controls, asylum and immigration, in accordance with the provisions of Article 62(2) and (3) and Article 63(1)(a) and (2)(a), and measures to prevent and combat crime in accordance with the provisions of Article 31(e) of the Treaty on European Union;

(b) other measures in the fields of asylum, immigration and safeguarding the rights of nationals of third countries, in accordance with the provisions of Article 63;

(c) measures in the field of judicial cooperation in civil matters as provided for in Article 65;

(d) appropriate measures to encourage and strengthen administrative cooperation, as provided for in Article 66;

(e) measures in the field of police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters aimed at a high level of security by preventing and combating crime within the Union in accordance with the provisions of the Treaty on European Union.
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-14-00291-CR

JAVIER RIOS MARTINEZ,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 12th District Court

Walker County, Texas

Trial Court No. 22614

A B A T E M E N T ORDER

On December 7, 2004, appellant, Javier Rios Martinez was charged with 

intoxication assault with a vehicle causing serious bodily injury. See TEX. PENAL CODE 

ANN. § 49.07 (West 2011). Pursuant to a plea bargain with the State, appellant pleaded 

guilty to the charged offense. On December 5, 2005, the trial court accepted appellant’s 

guilty plea, sentenced him to eight years’ imprisonment, suspended the sentence, and 

placed appellant on community supervision for eight years. 
Martinez v. State Page 2

Subsequently, on December 2, 2013, the State filed a motion to revoke appellant’s 

community supervision, alleging numerous violations. Presumably after a hearing, the 

trial court determined that the allegations contained in the State’s motion to revoke were 

true and thereafter revoked appellant’s community supervision and sentenced him to 

eight years’ confinement in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of 

Criminal Justice.

On October 1, 2014, appellant’s retained counsel, Rosalind Kelly, filed a notice of 

appeal in this matter. The Clerk’s Record in this matter was filed on November 4, 2014. 

Our records indicate that appellant’s counsel did not request that a copy of the Reporter’s 

Record be filed in this Court; therefore, on January 12, 2015, we submitted this case on 

the Clerk’s Record only.

On February 18, 2015, we informed Kelly that her brief in this matter was late. In 

our February 18, 2015 letter, we noted that, unless a brief or satisfactory response is 

received within fourteen days, we would abate this appeal and order the trial court to 

conduct a hearing pursuant to Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 38.8(b)(2)-(3). See TEX.

R. APP. P. 38.8(b)(2)-(3). On March 4, 2015, Kelly filed a motion for extension of time, 

requesting an additional sixty days to file her brief in this matter. We granted Kelly’s 

motion.

When we did not receive a response from Kelly within sixty days, we sent another 

late brief notice. In our May 15, 2015 letter, we once again informed Kelly that this case 

would be abated for further proceedings in the trial court unless Kelly responded within 
Martinez v. State Page 3

fourteen days. The deadline for Kelly’s response was May 29, 2015. To date, we have not 

received a brief or response to our May 15, 2015 letter.

We hereby abate this appeal to the trial court to conduct any necessary hearings 

within twenty-eight (28) days after the date of this order pursuant to Texas Rules of 

Appellate Procedure 38.8(b)(2) and (3). See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b)(2)-(3). The trial court 

clerk and court reporter shall file supplemental records within forty-two (42) days after 

the date of this order.

PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Appeal abated

Order issued and filed on June 18, 2015

Do not publish
Exhibit 35.1

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

Chase Bank USA, National Association

First USA Credit Card Master Trust

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Chase Bank USA, National Association (the Bank), as Servicer, pursuant to the Third Amended and Restated Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as
of December 19, 2007 (as amended and supplemented from time to time, the Agreement) between the Bank, as transferor and servicer (in such capacity, the Servicer) and BNY Mellon Trust of Delaware as trustee, does hereby
certify that:



| | 1. | The Bank is, as of the date hereof, the Servicer under the Agreement.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | A review of the Servicers activities during the calendar year ended December 31, 2011 (the Reporting Period) and of its performance under the
Agreement has been made under my supervision.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 3. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the
Reporting Period.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this certificate this 29th day of March 2012.



CHASE BANK USA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as ServicerBy:

/s/ Keith W. SchuckName:

Keith W. SchuckTitle:

President