alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

Washington, DC 

BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

In the Matters of ) 

) 

Donald J. Trump, et al. ) MURs 7968 and 7969 

) 

STATEMENT OF REASONS OF

COMMISSIONER ELLEN L. WEINTRAUB

58: Number of matters that have come before the Federal Election Commission 

containing allegations involving former President Trump, his committees, or his family 

members. 

28: Number of those matters where the Commission’s nonpartisan professional staff in 

the Office of General Counsel (“OGC”) has recommended reason to believe that a violation 

occurred.

1

 

0: Number of times a Republican Commissioner has voted to approve an OGC 

recommendation against Mr. Trump. 

The outcomes are no longer surprising. My colleagues purport to be treating the former 

President and the current President alike,2 but the data is clear: At the FEC, Mr. Trump is in a 

category by himself. 

__________________ ___________________ 

Date Ellen L. Weintraub 

Commissioner 

1 See First General Counsel’s Reports in Matters Under Review 7094, 7096, 7098, 7135, 7207, 7220, 7265, 

7266, 7268, 7313, 7319, 7324, 7332, 7339, 7340, 7350, 7351, 7364, 7366, 7425, 7609, 7623, 7645, 7663, 7705,

7784, 7968, and 7969. 

2 See Statement of Reasons of Vice Chairman Cooksey and Commissioners Dickerson and Trainor, MURs 

7968 and 7969 (Donald J. Trump, et al.), in which my colleagues reject OGC’s analysis, which was well supported 

by Commission regulations and precedents, and substitute a wholly new analysis to justify dismissing the allegations 

against Mr. Trump. The facts in the Trump and Biden matters of course differed. For my analysis of the allegations 

against President Biden in MURs 7931 and 8059, see Statement of Reasons of Chair Lindenbaum and 

Commissioners Broussard and Weintraub, MURs 7931 and 8050 (Joseph R. Biden Jr., et al.). 

November 9, 2023

MUR796800151
# EUR-Lex - 12003TN14/APP - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12003TN14/APP

**Act concerning the conditions of accession of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia and the Slovak Republic and the adjustments to the Treaties on which the European Union is founded - Annex XIV: List referred to in Article 24 of the Act of Accession: Slovakia - Appendix **

*
Official Journal C 227 E , 23/09/2003 P. 1654 - 1654 Official Journal L 236 , 23/09/2003 P. 0924 - 0924 *

Appendix

referred to in Chapter 5, Section B to Annex XIV [*]

List of establishments, including shortcomings and deadlines for the correction of these shortcomings

No | Vet. No | Name of the establishment | Shortcomings | Date of full compliance |

1 | GA 6-2 | Sered'ský MP a.s., Bratislavská 385, Sered' | Council Directive 64/433/EEC: Annex I, Chapter I, point 1(a), (b) and (g)Annex I, Chapter I, point 11Annex I, Chapter II, point 14(a)Council Directive 77/99/EEC: Annex A, Chapter I, point 2(a), (b) and (c)Annex A, Chapter I, point 11 | 31.12.2006 |

2 | PB 5-6-1 | Slovryb a.s., Príbovce Hospodárske stredisko Považská Bystrica-Rybníky, Žilinská 776/3, 017 01 | Council Directive 91/493/EEC Annex, Chapter III.I point 1Annex, Chapter III.I point 2(a), (b), (c), (d), (e) and (g)Annex, Chapter III.I point 9 | 30.11.2006 |

[*] For the text of Annex XIV see OJ L 236, 23.9.2003, p. 915.

--------------------------------------------------
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1

                         GLOBAL BEVERAGE SOLUTIONS, INC.
                 FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2007
      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Jerry Pearring, certify that

      1.    I am the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
            Global Beverage Solutions, Inc.
      2.    Attached to this certification is Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
            March 31, 2007, a periodic report (the "periodic report") filed by
            the issuer with the Securities Exchange Commission pursuant to
            Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934
            (the "Exchange Act"), which contains financial statements.
      3.    I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
            pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
            o     The periodic report containing the financial statements fully
                  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
                  the Exchange Act, and
            o     The information in the periodic report fairly presents, in all
                  material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the issuer for the periods presented.

May 15, 2007                                    /s/ Jerry Pearring
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Jerry Pearring
                                                Chief Executive Officer and
                                                Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by Global Beverage Solutions, Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

This certification will not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that
section. This certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference
into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 even if the document with which it is submitted to the Securities and
Exchange Commission is so incorporated by reference.
# EUR-Lex - 12008E/AFI/DCL/53 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008E/AFI/DCL/53

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - DECLARATIONS annexed to the Final Act of the Intergovernmental Conference which adopted the Treaty of Lisbon, signed on 13 December 2007 - C. DECLARATIONS BY MEMBER STATES - 53. Declaration by the Czech Republic on the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0355 - 0356 *

53. Declaration by the Czech Republic on the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union

1. The Czech Republic recalls that the provisions of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union are addressed to the institutions and bodies of the European Union with due regard for the principle of subsidiarity and division of competences between the European Union and its Member States, as reaffirmed in Declaration (No 18) in relation to the delimitation of competences. The Czech Republic stresses that its provisions are addressed to the Member States only when they are implementing Union law, and not when they are adopting and implementing national law independently from Union law.

2. The Czech Republic also emphasises that the Charter does not extend the field of application of Union law and does not establish any new power for the Union. It does not diminish the field of application of national law and does not restrain any current powers of the national authorities in this field.

3. The Czech Republic stresses that, in so far as the Charter recognises fundamental rights and principles as they result from constitutional traditions common to the Member States, those rights and principles are to be interpreted in harmony with those traditions.

4. The Czech Republic further stresses that nothing in the Charter may be interpreted as restricting or adversely affecting human rights and fundamental freedoms as recognised, in their respective field of application, by Union law and by international agreements to which the Union or all the Member States are party, including the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, and by the Member States' Constitutions.

--------------------------------------------------
# EUR-Lex - 12004V170 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V170

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART III — THE POLICIES AND FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - TITLE III — INTERNAL POLICIES AND ACTION - CHAPTER I — INTERNAL MARKET - Section 6 — Fiscal provisions - Article III-170 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0073 - 0073 *

Article III-170

1. No Member State shall impose, directly or indirectly, on the products of other Member States any internal taxation of any kind in excess of that imposed directly or indirectly on similar domestic products.

Furthermore, no Member State shall impose on the products of other Member States any internal taxation of such a nature as to afford indirect protection to other products.

2. Where products are exported by a Member State to the territory of another Member State, any repayment of internal taxation shall not exceed the internal taxation imposed on them whether directly or indirectly.

3. In the case of charges other than turnover taxes, excise duties and other forms of indirect taxation, remissions and repayments in respect of exports to other Member States may not be granted and countervailing charges in respect of imports from Member States may not be imposed unless the provisions contemplated have been previously approved for a limited period by a European decision adopted by the Council on a proposal from the Commission.

--------------------------------------------------
BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

In the Matter of )

Cowboy Analytics, LLC

)

)

AO 2023-08

Agenda Documents No. 23-28-A and 

No. 23-28-B

CERTIFICATION

I, Vicktoria J. Allen, recording secretary of the Federal Election Commission open meeting 

on December 14, 2023 do hereby certify that the Commission took the following actions in the 

above-captioned matter: 

1. Failed by a vote of 2-3 to:

Approve Agenda Document No. 23-28-B, draft B.

Commissioners Broussard and Weintraub voted affirmatively for the motion. 

Commissioners Cooksey, Dickerson, and Trainor dissented. Commissioner Lindenbaum 

abstained.

2. Failed by a vote of 3-3 to:

Approve Agenda Document No. 23-28-A, which is draft A.

Commissioners Cooksey, Dickerson, and Trainor voted affirmatively for the motion. 

Commissioners Broussard, Lindenbaum, and Weintraub dissented.

3. Decided by a vote of 6-0 to:

Instruct the Office General Counsel to draft a third draft response 

to the advisory opinion consistent with the overlapping answers of

drafts A and B, and to circulate such draft for a tally vote to the

Commission.

Commissioners Broussard, Cooksey, Dickerson, Lindenbaum, Trainor, and Weintraub 

voted affirmatively for the decision.
Federal Election Commission Page 2

Certification for AO 2023-08

December 14, 2023

Attest:

 December 15, 2023

Date Vicktoria J. Allen

Deputy Secretary of the Commission
USDANEWSVOLUME57 NO. 7 - SEPTEMBER 1998
September 2014

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) 

Grant Payment Request System (GPRS)

Q: What is the Grant Payment Request System (GPRS)?

A: GPRS is a web-based payment request system that allows grantees to perform drawdown 

requests using the internet.

Q: What is the website for GPRS?

A: https://grants.ojp.usdoj.gov/gprs/welcome. 

Q: Is there a user guide for GPRS?

A: Yes. The user guide can be found at http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/about/offices/ocfogprs.htm. 

Q: How will I register for access to GPRS?

A: Financial Points of Contact (FPOCs) can request access through a self-registration

process in GPRS.

All of the COPS Office grantees with accounts in GPRS have the role of Drawdown 

Specialist. The COPS Office grantee may request to be a GPRS Drawdown Specialist by 

accessing the GPRS website and selecting the option to self-register. After the grantee 

has submitted the request to register, a COPS Office GPRS Registrar will review and 

approve the request. After the request is approved, a confirmation email is sent to the 

FPOC with notification that the FPOC has been granted access to GPRS as a Drawdown 

Specialist. The confirmation email will include a temporary password with instructions to 

log in and create a permanent password and may take a couple of days to arrive due to 

the nature of the approval process. Once a permanent password is created, the 

Drawdown Specialist will be granted access to GPRS and will use the user ID entered 

during the self-registration process and the newly created permanent password to log into 

GPRS. 

Q: If I am a GMS (OJP/OVW) user, can I use my GMS User ID to register for the COPS

Office grants in GPRS?

A: No. You will have two separate accounts in GPRS, a GMS account and a COPS Office

account. All GMS users will register in GPRS with their GMS user ID. All COPS users will 

register in GPRS using a unique user ID that cannot be the same as a GMS user ID.

Please remember that the user ID entered during registration must be unique and not the 

same as a GMS user ID.

Q: If I already have a GPRS username, and have received a new award, how do I gain

access to my new award in GPRS?

A: Those Drawdown Specialists that have already been approved will need to request the

new award addition. Please email the GPRS Registrar 

(COPSGPRSRegistration@usdoj.gov) with your COPS username, first and last name, 

vendor number and the new award number. Please note that you will not be able to draw 

down from the new award until the signed award document has been received by the 

COPS Office. 

Q: What do I do if the Points of Contact for my grant have changed?

A: If you need to change your POC for your grant, please contact the Response Center at

800-421-6770 for assistance with accessing the COPS Office Agency Portal.
# EUR-Lex - 12004V256 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V256

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART III — THE POLICIES AND FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - TITLE III — INTERNAL POLICIES AND ACTION - CHAPTER III — POLICIES IN OTHER AREAS - Section 10 — Energy - Article III-256 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0112 - 0112 *

Article III-256

1. In the context of the establishment and functioning of the internal market and with regard for the need to preserve and improve the environment, Union policy on energy shall aim to:

(a) ensure the functioning of the energy market;

(b) ensure security of energy supply in the Union, and

(c) promote energy efficiency and energy saving and the development of new and renewable forms of energy.

2. Without prejudice to the application of other provisions of the Constitution, the objectives in paragraph 1 shall be achieved by measures enacted in European laws or framework laws. Such laws or framework laws shall be adopted after consultation of the Committee of the Regions and the Economic and Social Committee.

Such European laws or framework laws shall not affect a Member State's right to determine the conditions for exploiting its energy resources, its choice between different energy sources and the general structure of its energy supply, without prejudice to Article III-234(2)(c).

3. By way of derogation from paragraph 2, a European law or framework law of the Council shall establish the measures referred to therein when they are primarily of a fiscal nature. The Council shall act unanimously after consulting the European Parliament.

--------------------------------------------------
SUPREME COURT.

#### Nanning Vanderheyden, respondent, agt. William Gary and others, appellants.

Notices of pendency and returns to attachments, may he *amended*by inserting in the notices and inventories, a specific description of a lot of land *omitted by mistake.*

*Albany General Term,*

*December,*1869.

Appeal from an order made at special term by Justice Ingalls, amending notices of pendency and the returns to attachments by inserting in the notices and inventories, a specific description of a lot of land omitted by mistake.

The language of the inventory on the return to the attachments was:' *“*One farm of land, being partly situated in the town of Brunswick and the city of Troy, known as the Gary farm, and containing three hundred and fifty acres of land, be the same more or less; a printed discription of said farm is hereunto annexed.” The notices of pendency contained the same specific description.

The printed description referred to was very.long, and embracing specific descriptions of a large number of separate lots, but a specific description of one lot of twenty acres was omitted.

The motion papers showed:

*First.*That the defendants owned, and were in possession of the twenty acre lot at the time of the issuing of the attachments.

*Second.*That this was known to the deputy sheriff who had charge of the attachments, that he intended to levy on the twenty acre lot, and to include it in the printed description, supposed it was included, but that it was omitted by oversight and inadvertence.

*368
      *Third.*That the twenty acre lot has, for more than twenty years, been known as a part of the so-called Gary farm.

*Fourth.*That shortly after the levy under the attachments, the defendants made a general assignment for the benefit of creditors, that this lot is claimed and this motion is opposed by the *assignee alone, and that no one else has any interest adverse to the plaintiff.*

O. E. Patterson, *for appellants.*

Irving Brown, *for*respondents,

cited, as to the validity of the levy, (7 *How.,*381; 8 *How.,*77 ; 20 *How.,*430 ; as to the power to amend, 1 *Cow.,*430; 8*How., 79*; and as tc the rights of the assignee, 17 *N. Y.,*28, 580).

*By the*Cowrt.—Order affirmed.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, May 22, 2020. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, May 22, 2020 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A20A1622. ORLANDO GATEWAY HAMPTON, LLC v. MHG ORLANDO GATEWAY HN, LP.
Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion is hereby GRANTED.
MEMO TO FILE: MEETING WITH AFPA -7/23/2014 

DISCUSS STATUS OF PROPOSED RULE ON C&D WOOD, PRRS, RR TIES. 
£ (J ,{ OJ V-' 'L 

er>,t/aswt?f_ 

Gfo.i { c (i~ 

7 c 3.> - ./t f'. 7 ) ) 

it>J ~ )0 r'( -f:1'18 

//7' Z.l~ ?.?~') 

ft,;o -1:?3 -?2Yr;, 

8a--, '-, 4'1 ) l.:l :;r;-

71 s-- 6"&--6- 77 s-~­

trov -6Sz- '!13 3 

;w;? - t(ft; 3 -r). 7-00 

9oJ -11 9 :Sg 77 

{ ?:,C) ~5 '7> 0 o~ <:, y, -s lr2.. 7 

?-oz-4£,s -2-52'? 

2-tJ t'- 3 8''-f- 7 ~ 0?_ 

2C/ 2 - 4/,:; ,.. 8-'-1 tJ 1 

7o 7 3DIJ - //80 

7Cf3- 3'-t-r- 8"~~ 4 

7 o 3- 3!J 2'-- '7 r a & 

9o3 -3.?<6 . <6 1o "> s- 7o>-'3 ~- oo \'"') 

37) 6361 
_J 

u 

z 

::J 

0 

u 

Cl 

~ 

... 

Q) 

2 

< 

u 

cr:. 

w 

I: 

< 

Q. 

~c 

a..o 

c ·- caoa"!a 

(.) ·- ·- ~ (.) (GQ)o 

E ... Ch 

ctaf~ -

.. 

·-~~:;j~ 

-;~ 

-...:r. 
• Construction & Demolition (C&D) Woo

• Paper Recycling Residuals 

• Creosote-treated Rail Ties 

2 

AJMrtcan 

for&St & Pape

. Association 
• Alternative fuels for energy recovery- 

disposal 

• Combustion integral to the process 

• Functionally equivalent to traditional f

Amertcan ~r'e$t & Pape

Association 
• Agree with EPA's Definition 

- Disaster Debris inherent in definition 

• Management Practices 

- Support trained operators- not prescriptive 

- Clarify management practices for lead 

- Do not demand removal of 100% of contami

- Do not dictate approaches- change rule tex

.., 

.) 

• Positive and Negative sorting both good 

• XFR Technology is an approach, but expensive 

American 

Forest & Pape

Association 
• Support conclusions on formaldehyde 

• CCA-Treated and Penta-treated Wood 

-Support visual identification 

• Written Certification 

-Should be required from processors only 

.1 

American 

Fot"e$t & Paper 

. Association 
• Amend definition 

- Paper recycling residuals means the co-pr

material generated from the recycling of 

paperboard, and corrugated containers a

composed primarily of wet strength and s

wood fibers that cannot be used to make 

paper and paperboard products. 

- Drop reference to fibers from OCC rejects 

could be limiting 

5 

American 

F'or&$t & Pape

Association 
• Meaningful heating value 

-Do not use 5000 Btu as threshold 

• Other discarded materials 

-Addressed through industry standards 

- Economic incentives to exclude 

• Add off-site burning 

- Meets legal criteria for listing 

- Better for environment to recover energy 

6 

American 

~rest & Paper Association 
• Designed to Burn 

- List of boilers- hybrid suspension grate as w

- If switch from fuel oil to gas in either the futu

past then DTB 

- Limitation on usage- rely on air permits 

- Additional categories based on renewable fu

characteristics and environmental benefits 

- No further record keeping needed 

• Definition should include both creosote a

borate treated ties 

- avoid stranded processing assets 

American Fore$t & Pa~r 

Association 
• Need for further clarifications or inform

• Encourage rapid finalization to provide 

certainty to fuel users 

Amertcan 

Fomt & Paper 

. Association
#### §§ 1154.141-1154.148 [Reserved]
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/LPS4454 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
Exhibit
      21.01





**Subsidiaries
      of the Company**





America’s
      Drive-In Brand Properties LLC, a Kansas limited liability company


America’s
      Drive-In Holding Inc., a Kansas corporation


America’s
      Drive-In Restaurants LLC, a Kansas limited liability company


Sonic
      Capital LLC, a Delaware limited liability company


Sonic
      Community Development, Inc., an Oklahoma corporation


Sonic
      Industries LLC, a Delaware limited liability company


Sonic
      Industries Franchising LLC, a Delaware limited liability company


Sonic
      Industries Services Inc., an Oklahoma corporation


Sonic
      Restaurants, Inc., an Oklahoma corporation


Sonic
      Property Development, L.L.C., an Oklahoma limited liability company


Sonic
      Technology Fund, L.L.C., an Oklahoma limited liability company


Sonic
      Value Card, L.L.C., a Virginia limited liability company


SPOTlight,
      LLC, an Oklahoma limited liability company


SRI
      Real
      Estate Holding LLC, a Delaware limited liability company


SRI
      Real
      Estate Properties LLC, a Delaware limited liability company








As
      of
      August 31, 2007, Sonic Restaurants, Inc. or America’s Drive-In Holding Inc. owns
      the majority interest in 654 partnerships and limited liability companies,
      each
      of which operates a Sonic Drive-In restaurant.  The names of those 654
      majority-owned entities have been omitted.
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74

 36

 38

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

08/24

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 24 Aug 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.44 N 77.04 W Meters AGL

★

■

■

■

■

★ ■ ■ ■

■

★

●

●

●

★ ●

● ● ●