alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EUR-Lex - 12005SP008 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12005SP008

**Protocol concerning the conditions and arrangements for admission of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania to the European Union - PART ONE:PRINCIPLES - Article 8 **

*
Official Journal L 157 , 21/06/2005 P. 0032 - 0032 *

Article 8

1. Acts adopted by the institutions to which the transitional provisions laid down in this Protocol relate shall retain their status in law; in particular, the procedures for amending those acts shall continue to apply.

2. Provisions of this Protocol the purpose or effect of which is to repeal or amend acts adopted by the institutions, otherwise than as a transitional measure, shall have the same status in law as the provisions which they repeal or amend and shall be subject to the same rules as those provisions.

--------------------------------------------------
# EUR-Lex - 12002M020 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 12002M020

**Treaty on European Union (Nice consolidated version) - Title V: Provisions on a common foreign and security policy - Article 20 - Article J.10 - EU Treaty (Maastricht 1992) - **

*
Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0017 - 0017 Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0159 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 191 , 29/07/1992 P. 0060 *

Treaty on European Union (Nice consolidated version)

Title V: Provisions on a common foreign and security policy

Article 20

Article J.10 - EU Treaty (Maastricht 1992)

Article 20

The diplomatic and consular missions of the Member States and the Commission delegations in third countries and international conferences, and their representations to international organisations, shall cooperate in ensuring that the common positions and joint actions adopted by the Council are complied with and implemented.

They shall step up cooperation by exchanging information, carrying out joint assessments and contributing to the implementation of the provisions referred to in Article 20 of the Treaty establishing the European Community.
Mr. George S. Aburn, Jr., Director

Maryland Department ofthe Environment

Air and Radiation Management Administration

1800 Washington Boulevard

Baltimore, Maryland 21230

Dear Mr. Abum:

On June 3, 2010, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) revised the heathbased National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) for sulfur dioxide (SO 2)by establishing

a new 1-hour standard at a level of 75 parts per billion (ppb). This new 1-hour standard will

protect public health by reducing people’s exposure to high short-term (5-minutes to 24-hours)

concentrations of SO2. An area meets the new standard when the 3-year average of the 99thi

percentile of 1-hour daily maximum concentrations does not exceed 75 ppb.

Section I 07(d)( 1) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) describes the process EPA follows for

designating areas as meeting or not meeting a new or revised NAAQS. Within one year of

establishing a new or revised standard, each governor must recommend a designation of

attainment, nonattainment or unclassifiable, with appropriate boundaries, for areas within their

jurisdiction. Therefore, we ask that your state provide designatica recommendations, including

appropriate area boundaries, for all areas by June 3, 2011, with respect to the 1-hour SO2

NAAQS.

The enclosed memorandum provides guidance to state and local air pollution-control

agencies and tribes on the timeline and process for designating areas under the revised SO2

standard. We plan to announce our intended designations no later than 120 days prior to

promulgating final designations. Following the announcement of intended designations, states

and tribes will have the opportunity to comment on any modifications EPA proposes to theirrecommendations. EPA intends to complete designations by no later than June 3, 2012.

0 Printed on 100% recycled/recyclablepaper with 100% post-consumerfiber andprocess chlorinefree.

Customer Service Hotline: 1-800-4.c8-24 74
Diana Esher, Director

Air Protection Division

Enclosure

cc: Ms. Diane Franks, Program Manager, Air Quality Planning Program

Air and Radiation Management Administration, Maryland Department ofthe Environment

Printed on 100% recycled/recyclable paper with 100% post-consumerfiber andprocess chlorinefree.

Customer Service Holline: 1-800-438-2474
2021 COPS Anti-Methamphetamine Program (CAMP) Awards

State Agency Name Award Amount

Florida Florida Department of Law Enforcement $1,530,051

Iowa Iowa Department of Public Safety $1,513,660

Massachusetts Massachusetts State Police $1,303,089

New Jersey New Jersey Department of Law and Public Safety $1,079,206

New York New York State Police $1,646,597

Oklahoma Oklahoma State Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs Control $1,974,307

Pennsylvania Pennsylvania Attorney General $2,000,000

Tennessee Tennessee Bureau of Investigation $1,000,000

Virginia Virginia State Police $1,303,090

Total number of awards 9

TOTAL AMOUNT OF 2021 CAMP AWARDS $13,350,000
#### § 1120.1 Purpose and scope of this part.

This part contains the general rules of the Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board for public access to Board records. These regulations implement 5 U.S.C. 552, the Freedom of Information Act, as amended, and the policy of the Board. It is the Board's policy to disseminate information on matters of interest to the public and to disclose on request all information contained in records in its custody insofar as is compatible with the discharge of its responsibilities and consistent with the law. This part sets forth generally the categories of records accessible to the public, the types of records subject to prohibitions or restrictions on disclosure, and the places and procedures to obtain information from records in the custody of the A&TBCB.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We have issued our report dated February 12, 1998, accompanying the consolidated
financial statements and schedule included in the Annual Report of WinStar
Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 1997. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in
the Registration Statements of WinStar Communications, Inc. on Forms S-8
(Registration Nos. 33-87568; 33-98668; 333-47391; 333-31057 and 333-15073), Form
S-4 (Registration No. 333-40755) and Forms S-3 (Registration Nos. 33-95242;
333-6073; 333-6079 and 333-18465).

GRANT THORNTON LLP

New York, New York
March 31, 1998
#### § 1212.665 State.

*State* means any of the States of the United States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, or any territory or possession of the United States.
#### § 81.7 Availability of funds.

Funds allocated to a State are available for obligation during the fiscal year for which they are allocated and until the close of the succeeding fiscal year. For the purpose of this section, obligation of allocated funds occurs when a Project Agreement is signed by the Secretary, or his authorized representative, attesting to his approval.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       3,837,781
<SECURITIES>                                   168,288
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,220,898
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,226,967
<PP&E>                                      17,500,186
<DEPRECIATION>                               8,780,173
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,946,980
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          554,736
<BONDS>                                      4,192,148
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,200,096
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,946,980
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,111,970
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,286,569
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             386,021
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                439,380
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            439,380
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   439,380
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Delta Regional Authority","provider_url":"https:\/\/dra.gov","author_name":"AhaZapier","author_url":"https:\/\/dra.gov\/author\/ahazapier\/","title":"Biden-Harris Administration Announces Over $1.5 Million Investment into Western Kentucky Communities - Delta Regional Authority","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"efygumeW66\"><a href=\"https:\/\/dra.gov\/biden-harris-administration-announces-over-1-5-million-investment-into-western-kentucky-communities\/\">Biden-Harris Administration Announces Over $1.5 Million Investment into Western Kentucky Communities<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/dra.gov\/biden-harris-administration-announces-over-1-5-million-investment-into-western-kentucky-communities\/embed\/#?secret=efygumeW66\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Biden-Harris Administration Announces Over $1.5 Million Investment into Western Kentucky Communities” — Delta Regional Authority\" data-secret=\"efygumeW66\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"Biden-Harris Administration Announces Over $1.5 Million Investment into Western Kentucky Communities","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/mcusercontent.com\/90665e275659657eb2097e76c\/images\/3c279e98-4eee-68aa-d6e2-455119b8e0a5.png"}
EXHIBIT 23

                                Barry L. Friedman
                           Certified Public Accountant


1582 Tulita Drive                                   Office (702) 361-8414
Las Vegas, NV 89123                                 Fax No. (702) 896-0278


To whom it may concern:                                     November 1, 2000

The firm of Barry L. Friedman, P.C., Certified Public Accountant consents to
the inclusion of their report of November 1, 2000, on the Financial Statements
of BARRINGTON LABORATORIES, INC., as of September 30, 2000, in any filings that
are necessary now or in the near future with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission.


Very truly yours,

/s/ Barry L. Friedman
---------------------------
Barry L. Friedman
Certified Public Accountant


<PAGE>
#### §§ 92.23-92.29 [Reserved]
# EUR-Lex - 12005SAN06/03 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12005SAN06/03

**Act concerning the conditions of accession of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania and the adjustments to the Treaties on which the European Union is founded - Annex VI:List referred to in Article 23 of the Act of Accession: transitional measures, Bulgaria - 3.Free movement of capital **

*
Official Journal L 157 , 21/06/2005 P. 0282 - 0282 *

3. FREE MOVEMENT OF CAPITAL

Treaty on European Union,

Treaty establishing the European Community.

1. Notwithstanding the obligations under the Treaties on which the European Union is founded, Bulgaria may maintain in force for five years from the date of accession the restrictions laid down in its legislation, existing at the time of signature of the Treaty of Accession, on the acquisition of ownership over land for secondary residences by nationals of the Member States or the States which are a party to the European Economic Area Agreement (EEAA) non-resident in Bulgaria and by legal persons formed in accordance with the laws of another Member State or of an EEAA State.

Nationals of the Member States and nationals of the States which are a party to the European Economic Area Agreement who are legally resident in Bulgaria shall not be subject to the provisions of the preceding subparagraph or to any rules and procedures other than those to which nationals of Bulgaria are subject.

2. Notwithstanding the obligations under the Treaties on which the European Union is founded, Bulgaria may maintain in force for seven years from the date of accession the restrictions laid down in its legislation, existing at the time of signature of the Treaty of Accession, on the acquisition of agricultural land, forests and forestry land by nationals of another Member State, by nationals of the States which are a party to the European Economic Area Agreement and by legal persons formed in accordance with the laws of another Member State or an EEAA State. In no instance may a national of a Member State be treated less favourably in respect of the acquisition of agricultural land, forests and forestry land than at the date of signature of the Accession Treaty or be treated in a more restrictive way than a national of a third country.

Self-employed farmers who are nationals of another Member State and who wish to establish themselves and legally reside in Bulgaria, shall not be subject to the provisions of the preceding subparagraph or to any procedures other than those to which nationals of Bulgaria are subject.

A general review of these transitional measures shall be held in the third year following the date of accession. To this effect, the Commission shall submit a report to the Council. The Council may, acting unanimously on a proposal from the Commission, decide to shorten or terminate the transitional period indicated in the first subparagraph.

--------------------------------------------------
# EUR-Lex - 12006E256 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12006E256

**Treaty establishing the European Community (consolidated version) - Part Five - Institutions of the Community - TITLE I - Provisions governing the institutions - Chapter 2 - Provisions common to several institutions - Article 256 **

*
Official Journal C 321 E , 29/12/2006 P. 0157 - 0157 Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0135 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0282 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0067 - Consolidated version (EEC Treaty - no official publication available) *

Article 256

Decisions of the Council or of the Commission which impose a pecuniary obligation on persons other than States, shall be enforceable.

Enforcement shall be governed by the rules of civil procedure in force in the State in the territory of which it is carried out. The order for its enforcement shall be appended to the decision, without other formality than verification of the authenticity of the decision, by the national authority which the government of each Member State shall designate for this purpose and shall make known to the Commission and to the Court of Justice.

When these formalities have been completed on application by the party concerned, the latter may proceed to enforcement in accordance with the national law, by bringing the matter directly before the competent authority.

Enforcement may be suspended only by a decision of the Court of Justice. However, the courts of the country concerned shall have jurisdiction over complaints that enforcement is being carried out in an irregular manner.

--------------------------------------------------
MUR812200001

MUR812200002

MUR812200003
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE O F FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME E XPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED TODD BUCHANA N , Appel lant ,
v. Case N o. 5D 22

- 1428 LT Case No

. 2009- CF

- 013383 -A-O

STATE O F FLORIDA ,

Appellee

.

_____________________________ / Decision filed November 1 5 , 2 022 3.850 A ppeal f rom the C ircuit C ourt for Orange County , Wayne C. Wooten , J udge. Todd Buchanan, Orlando, pr o s e. No Appearance f or Appellee.

PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED.

COHEN , NARDELLA and WOZNIAK , JJ., concur.
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 15

- 00069

- CV

WILLIAM M. WINDSOR

, Appellant

v.

KELLIE MCDOUGALD

, Appellee

From the 378th District Court

Ellis County, Texas

Trial Court No. 88611

ORDER

Appellant’s Request for Leave to Supplement Record filed on July 2, 2015 is denied.

PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Request denied

Order issued and filed July 9 , 2015
§ 1150.44 Amendments. ( a ) The Executive Director may amend the citation as a matter of course before an answer is filed. A respondent may amend its answer once as a matter of course, but not later than five (5) days after the filing of the original answer. Other amendments of the citation or the answer shall be made only by leave of judge.
( b ) An amended citation shall be answered within five (5) days of its service, or within the time for filing an answer to the original citation, whichever is longer.
§ 80.65 Does an agency have to allocate funds between marine and freshwater fisheries projects? Yes. Each coastal State's fish and wildlife agency must equitably allocate the funds apportioned under the Dingell-Johnson Sport Fish Restoration Act between projects with benefits for marine fisheries and projects with benefits for freshwater fisheries. ( a ) The subprograms authorized by the Dingell-Johnson Sport Fish Restoration Act do not have to allocate funding in the same manner as long as the State fish and wildlife agency equitably allocates Dingell-Johnson Sport Fish Restoration funds as a whole between marine and freshwater fisheries.
( b ) The coastal States for purposes of this allocation are: ( 1 ) Alabama, Alaska, California, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Mississippi, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Texas, Virginia, and Washington;
( 2 ) The Commonwealths of Puerto Rico and the Northern Mariana Islands; and
( 3 ) The territories of Guam, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and American Samoa.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. 

Wniteb $tates (!Court of §ppeaIs 

for tbe jf eberaI (!Circuit 

TIMOTHY c. BENNINGTON, 

Petitioner, 

AND 

STEVEN R. HAYES, 

Petitioner, 

AND 

TIMOTHY A. HUBAL, 

Petitioner, 

AND 

RICHARD E. KIDWELL, 

Petitioner, 

AND 

CARL C. WILLIAMS, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, 

Respondent, 

AND 

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, 

Intervenor. 
BENNINGTON v. MSPB 2 

2011-3222 

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection 

Board in consolidated case nos. CH0351100110-I-1, 

CH0351100117-I-1, CH0351100119-I-1, CH0351100128-I1, and CH0351100127-I-1. 

ON MOTION 

ORDER 

The United States Postal Service (USPS) moves 

without opposition to reform the caption to name the Merit 

Systems Protection Board as the respondent. and to name 

USPS as intervenor. USPS also moves without opposition 

for an extension of time to file its brief. 

Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 7703(a)(2), the Board is 

designated as the respondent when the Board's decision 

concerns the procedure or jurisdiction of the Board. The 

employing agency is designated as the respondent when 

the Board reaches the merits of the underlying case. 

Accordingly, 

IT Is ORDERED THAT: 

(1) The motion to reform the caption is granted. The 

revised official caption is reflected above. 

(2) The motion for an extension of time is granted. 

The briefs of the USPS and Board are due within 21 days 

from the date of filing of this order. 
3 

JAN 1 -, 2012 

Date 

cc: Carl C. Williams 

Richard E. Kidwell 

Steven R. Hayes 

Timothy A. Hubal 

Timothy C. Bennington 

Michael S. Macko, Esq. 

Keisha Dawn Bell, Esq. 

s19 

BENNINGTON v. MSPB 

FOR THE COURT 

/s/ Jan Horbaly 

Jan Horbaly 

Clerk 

FILED 

u.s. COURT OF APPEALS FOR 

THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT 

. JAN 1 72012 

JAN HORBAlY 

CLERK