alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EUR-Lex - 12005SAN07/05/B/02 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12005SAN07/05/B/02

**Act concerning the conditions of accession of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania and the adjustments to the Treaties on which the European Union is founded - Annex VII:List referred to in Article 23 of the Act of Accession: transitional measures, Romania - 5.Agriculture - B.Veterinary and phytosanitary legislation - II.Phytosanitary legislation **

*
Official Journal L 157 , 21/06/2005 P. 0323 - 0324 *

II. Phytosanitary legislation

31991 L 0414: Council Directive 91/414/EEC of 15 July 1991 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market (OJ L 230, 19.8.1991, p. 1), as last amended by:

- 32004 L 0099: Commission Directive 2004/99/EC of 1.10.2004 (OJ L 309, 6.10.2004, p. 6).

By way of derogation from Article 13(1) of Directive 91/414/EEC, Romania may postpone the deadlines for the provision of the information referred to in Annex II and Annex III to Directive 91/414/EEC for plant protection products currently authorised in Romania and marketed exclusively on Romanian territory and containing copper compounds (sulphate, oxychloride or hydroxide), sulphur, acetochlor, dimethoate and 2,4-D, provided that those ingredients are at the time listed in Annex I to that Directive. The abovementioned deadlines may be postponed until no later than 31 December 2009, except for 2,4-D for which the deadline may be postponed until no later than 31 December 2008. The above provisions shall only apply to those applicant companies which effectively started working on the generation or acquisition of the required data before 1 January 2005.

--------------------------------------------------
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-Q/A to the Quarterly Report of Integrated Environmental Technologies, Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Thomas S. Gifford, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)           the Report fully complies with the requirements of §13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, 15 U.S.C. §78m or 78o(d), and,





(2)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




August 15, 2011
By:
/s/ Thomas S. GiffordThomas S. GiffordExecutive Vice President,Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
**ODP Information Bulletin**
**No. 59   July 15, 2002**TO:All State Administrative Agency HeadsAll State Administrative Agency Points of ContactFROM:Andrew T. MitchellActing DirectorSUBJECT:Activation of New Data Release Capability in the ODP On-Line Data Collection Tool
The Office of Justice Programs (OJP), Office for Domestic Preparedness (ODP) is pleased to announce the activation of a new data release capability in the ODP On-Line Data Collection Tool.  This capability is being provided in direct response to feedback from the states indicating a need for an interim capability to update needs assessment and state strategy data in support of planning efforts at the state and local level.  
The attached fact sheet provides information on how to access and make use of this new capability, and describes additional, pending enhancements.  For technical assistance with any of the On-Line DataCollection Tool modules, you may contact the OJP toll-free help line at: 1-888-549-9901. You may also contact your ODP State and Local ProgramManagement Division program manager for additional information and assistance. 
Attachment (HTML and PDF)
Dolan Chemical Laboratory 4001 Bixby Road Groveport, OH 43125 T: 614-836-4221, Audinet 210-4221 F: 614-836-4168, Audinet 210-4168 http://aepenv/labs 

### Water Analysis

Location: Mountaineer Plant Report Date: 8/30/2012 Form REP-703 Rev. 0, 4/2012



### Sample Number:123611-001 Date Collected:08/21/2012 13:00 Date Received:8/22/2012 

### Bioreactor Effluent

Units Parameter Result RL Analysis ByAnalysis Date/TimeMethod MDL Data Qual ug/L Arsenic, As 3.18 0.1 DPC EPA 200.8 0.03 08/27/2012 13:21 ug/L Beryllium, Be < 0.1 0.5 DAM EPA 200.7 0.1 08/29/2012 09:52 U ug/L Molybdenum, Mo 529 0.1 DPC EPA 200.8 0.02 08/27/2012 13:21 ug/L Nickel, Ni 2.52 0.2 DPC EPA 200.8 0.04 08/27/2012 13:21 ug/L Selenium, Se 0.8 0.5 DPC EPA 200.8 0.1 08/27/2012 13:21 ug/L Uranium, U 95.0 0.01 DPC EPA 200.8 0.002 08/27/2012 13:21 mg/L Aluminum, Al 1.53 0.001 DPC EPA 200.8 0.0003 08/27/2012 13:21 mg/L Boron, B 179 0.01 DAM EPA 200.7 0.002 08/29/2012 09:52 mg/L Iron, Fe 0.772 0.01 DAM EPA 200.7 0.002 08/29/2012 09:52 mg/L Manganese, Mn 6.91 0.0005 DAM EPA 200.7 0.0001 08/29/2012 09:52



### Sample Number:123611-002Date Collected:08/21/2012 13:00 Date Received:8/22/2012 

### Nutrient Tank

Units Parameter Result RL Analysis ByAnalysis Date/TimeMethod MDL Data Qual ug/L Arsenic, As 155 5 DPC EPA 200.8 2 08/27/2012 13:26 ug/L Beryllium, Be < 5 20 DAM EPA 200.7 5 08/29/2012 10:36 U ug/L Molybdenum, Mo 141 5 DPC EPA 200.8 1 08/27/2012 13:26 ug/L Nickel, Ni 633 10 DPC EPA 200.8 2 08/27/2012 13:26 ug/L Selenium, Se 221 20 DPC EPA 200.8 5 08/27/2012 13:26 ug/L Uranium, U 241 0.5 DPC EPA 200.8 0.1 08/27/2012 13:26 mg/L Aluminum, Al 22.1 0.05 DPC EPA 200.8 0.02 08/27/2012 13:26 mg/L Boron, B 4.70 0.5 DAM EPA 200.7 0.1 08/29/2012 10:37 mg/L Iron, Fe 110 0.5 DAM EPA 200.7 0.1 08/29/2012 10:36 mg/L Manganese, Mn 11.0 0.02 DAM EPA 200.7 0.005 08/29/2012 10:36

Mountaineer Plant, 123611 Page 1 of 2THIS TEST REPORT RELATES ONLY TO THE ITEMS TESTED AND SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED EXCEPT IN FULL WITHOUT WRITTEN

APPROVAL OF THE LABORATORY. ALL TEST RESULTS MEET ALL OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ACCREDITING AUTHORITY, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. U: Analyte was analyzed and not detected at or above adjusted Method Detection Limit J: Analyte was positively identified, though the quantitation was below Reporting Limit.

Brian Snyder, Chemist II Email bssnyder@aep.comTel. 614-836-4224
Fax 614-836-4168 Audinet 210-4224

Mountaineer Plant, 123611 Page 2 of 2
Argued and submitted January 10,

affirmed February 2, 1994

#### PARIS L. TAYLOR, *Appellant, v.*Manfred (Fred) MAASS, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary, *Respondent.*

(93C12083; CA A80771)

866 P2d 526

Garrett A. Richardson argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Multnomah Defenders.

Youlee Y. You argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.

Before Deits, Presiding Judge, and Riggs, Judge, and Durham, Judge pro tempore.

PER CURIAM

Affirmed. *Allen v. Maass,*124 Or App 195, 859 P2d 1205 (1993).
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION OF CFO AS REQUIRED BY RULE 13a-14 or 15d-14 OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Zap.Com Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
    5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
    /s/ Leonard DiSalvo

Leonard DiSalvo
Vice President  Finance and CFO
 16
# EUR-Lex - 11992M/PRO/SEBC/18 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11992M/PRO/SEBC/18

**Treaty on European Union - Protocol on the statute of the european system of central banks and of the European Central Bank - Chapter IV: Monetary functions and operations of the ESCB - Article 18: Open market and credit operations **

*
Official Journal C 191 , 29/07/1992 P. 0072 *

Article 18

Open market and credit operations

18.1. In order to achieve the objectives of the ESCB and to carry out its tasks, the ECB and the national central banks may:

- operate in the financial markets by buying and selling outright (spot and forward) or under repurchase agreement and by lending or borrowing claims and marketable instruments, whether in Community or in non-Community currencies, as well as precious metals;

- conduct credit operations with credit institutions and other market participants, with lending being based on adequate collateral.

18.2. The ECB shall establish general principles for open market and credit operations carried out by itself or the national central banks, including for the announcement of conditions under which they stand ready to enter into such transactions.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-2045

MELANIE KELLEY, 

 Plaintiff - Appellant, 

 v. 

EDWARD E. SALEEBY, JR.; DEBBIE J. FREEMAN; HARRIET E. 

WILMETH; CARL A. SALEEBY; LISA COHEN, a/k/a Lisa A. Kinon; 

GERALD MALLOY; JAMIE MURDOCK; MARVIN C. LAWSON; CHERYL 

TURNER HOPKINS; TURNER PADGET GRAHAM & LANEY; JOHNNY JUNIOR 

MITCHELL, 

 Defendants - Appellees. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. 

(4:08-cv-00639-RBH) 

Submitted: November 20, 2008 Decided: November 25, 2008 

Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Melanie Kelley, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Melanie Kelley appeals the district court’s order 

dismissing her complaint. The district court referred this case 

to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) 

(2000). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied 

and advised Kelley that failure to file timely objections to 

this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district 

court order based upon the recommendation. Despite this 

warning, Kelley failed to object to the magistrate judge’s 

recommendation. 

The timely filing of specific objections to a 

magistrate judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve 

appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when 

the parties have been warned of the consequences of 

noncompliance. Wright v. Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th 

Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Kelley 

has waived appellate review by failing to timely file specific 

objections after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we 

affirm the judgment of the district court. We also deny 

Kelley’s motion for a transcript at government expense. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
Editorial Note on Part 660
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 660 appear at 67 FR 65906, Oct. 29, 2002, 88 FR 81358, Nov. 22, 2023.

§ 660.403 Relation to other laws. ( a ) The relation of this part to other laws is set forth in § 600.705 of this chapter, § 660.2, and paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section.
( b ) Any person fishing subject to this subpart who also engages in fishing for groundfish should consult Federal regulations in subpart C through G for applicable requirements of that subpart, including the requirement that vessels engaged in commercial fishing for groundfish (except commercial passenger vessels) have vessel identification in accordance with § 660.20.
( c ) Any person fishing subject to this subpart is bound by the international boundaries of the fishery management area described in § 660.402, notwithstanding any dispute or negotiation between the United States and any neighboring country regarding their respective jurisdictions, until such time as new boundaries are published by the United States.
[61 FR 34572, July 2, 1996, as amended at 76 FR 81858, Dec. 29, 2011]
# EUR-Lex - 12004V308 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V308

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART III — THE POLICIES AND FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - TITLE V — THE UNION'S EXTERNAL ACTION - CHAPTER II — COMMON FOREIGN AND SECURITY POLICY - Section 1 — Common provisions - Article III-308 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0138 - 0138 *

Article III-308

The implementation of the common foreign and security policy shall not affect the application of the procedures and the extent of the powers of the institutions laid down by the Constitution for the exercise of the Union competences referred to in Articles I-13 to I-15 and I-17.

Similarly, the implementation of the policies listed in those Articles shall not affect the application of the procedures and the extent of the powers of the institutions laid down by the Constitution for the exercise of the Union competences under this Chapter.

--------------------------------------------------
**Exhibit      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. Sec. 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/ Christopher                J. Floyd                                                    |   |   |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| Christopher                J. FloydChief                Financial OfficerFebruary                14, 2007 |   |   |   |

----
Certificate Number: 153 17-ILN-CC-0278588 16 

I CERTIFY that on August 4, 2016, at 10:21 o'clock AM PDT, Gary L Howard 

received from Access Counseling, Inc., an agency approved pursuant to 1 1 U.S.C. 

5 11 1 to provide credit counseling in the Northern District of Illinois, an 

individual [or group] briefing that complied with the provisions of 1 1 U.S .C. $5 

109(h) and 1 1 1. 

A debt repayment plan was not prepared. If a debt repayment plan was prepared, a 

copy of the debt repayment plan is attached to this certificate. 

This counseling session was conducted by internet. 

Date: August 4,2016 By: 

* 

Is~Eunice Francia 

Name: Eunice Francia 

Title: Counselor 

* Individuals who wish to file a bankruptcy case under title 11 of the United States Bankruptcy 

Code are required to file with the United States Bankruptcy Court a completed certificate of 

counseling from the nonprofit budget and credit counseling agency that provided the individual 

the counseling services and a copy of the debt repayment plan, if any, developed through the 

credit counseling agency. See 1 1 U.S.C. $8 109(h) and 521 (b). 

Case 16-26040 Doc 1 Filed 08/13/16 Entered 08/13/16 11:33:20 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-6178

MICHAEL ELLERY TORY, SR., Petitioner - Appellant, versus JACK LEE, Warden, Keen Mountain Correctional Center, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, Magistrate Judge. (CA-03-178-3) Submitted: June 18, 2004 Decided: August 17, 2004 Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael Ellery Tory, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. John H. McLees, Jr., OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Michael Ellery Tory, Sr., appeals from the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition by the magistrate judge. An appeal may not be taken to this court from the final order in a § 2254 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that jurists of reason would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have reviewed the record and conclude that Tory has not made the requisite showing. We therefore deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Document

 [To Be Placed on Spark Energy, Inc. Letterhead] 
NOTICE OF GRANT OF RESTRICTED STOCK UNITS 
I am very pleased to inform you that pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Spark Energy, Inc. Second Amended and Restated Long Term Incentive Plan, attached as Appendix A (the “Plan”), and the associated Restricted Stock Unit Agreement, attached as Appendix B (the “Agreement”), you are hereby granted an award to receive the number of Restricted Stock Units set forth below whereby each Restricted Stock Unit represents the right to receive one share of Stock, plus rights to certain Dividend Equivalents described in Section 3 of the Agreement, subject to certain restrictions thereon, and under the terms and conditions set forth below, in the Agreement, and in the Plan (the “Restricted Stock Units”). Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Plan. 
 
									
			
	Grantee:	  	                                                         
			
	Date of Grant:
	  	                     (“Date of Grant”)

			
	Number of Restricted Stock Units:
	  	                                
			
	Vesting Schedule:
	  	


By accepting this Award and the benefits hereunder, you acknowledge and agree that (a) you are not relying upon any written or oral statement or representation of the Company, its affiliates, or any of their respective employees, directors, officers, attorneys or agents (collectively, the “Company Parties”) regarding the tax effects associated with your execution of this Notice of Grant of Restricted Stock Units and your receipt and holding of and the vesting of the Restricted Stock Units, and (b) you are relying on your own judgment and the judgment of the professionals of your choice with whom you have consulted. You hereby release, acquit and forever discharge the Company Parties from all actions, causes of actions, suits, debts, obligations, liabilities, claims, damages, losses, costs and expenses of any nature whatsoever, known or unknown, on account of, arising out of, or in any way related to the tax effects associated with your receipt and holding of and the vesting of the Restricted Stock Units. 
You further acknowledge receipt of a copy of the Plan and the Agreement and agree to all of the terms and conditions of the Plan and the Agreement which are incorporated herein by reference. 
Congratulations, and thanks for your commitment to our continued success! 
Spark Energy, Inc., 
a Delaware Corporation 
 
									
			
	By:	 	 
	Name:	 	 
	Title:	 	 


 
									
			
	Attachments:	 	Appendix A – Spark Energy, Inc. Second Amended and Restated Long Term Incentive Plan
		 	Appendix B – Restricted Stock Unit Agreement


{N4023951.2}








{N4023951.2}







Appendix A 
Spark Energy, Inc. Second Amended and Restated Long Term Incentive Plan 




{N4023951.2}







Appendix B 
Restricted Stock Unit Agreement 


{N4023951.2}
# EUR-Lex - 12004V129 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V129

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART III — THE POLICIES AND FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - TITLE II — NON-DISCRIMINATION AND CITIZENSHIP - Article III-129 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0057 - 0057 *

Article III-129

The Commission shall report to the European Parliament, to the Council and to the Economic and Social Committee every three years on the application of Article I-10 and of this Title. This report shall take account of the development of the Union.

On the basis of this report, and without prejudice to the other provisions of the Constitution, a European law or framework law of the Council may add to the rights laid down in Article I-10. The Council shall act unanimously after obtaining the consent of the European Parliament. The law or framework law concerned shall not enter into force until it is approved by the Member States in accordance with their respective constitutional requirements.

--------------------------------------------------