alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EUR-Lex - 12005S/TTE/06 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12005S/TTE/06

**Treaty between the Kingdom of Belgium, the Czech Republic, the Kingdom of Denmark, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Republic of Estonia, the Hellenic Republic, the Kingdom of Spain, the French Republic, Ireland, the Italian Republic, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the Republic of Austria, the Republic of Poland, the Portuguese Republic, the Republic of Slovenia, the Slovak Republic, the Republic of Finland, the Kingdom of Sweden, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (Member States of the European Union) and the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania, concerning the accession of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania to the European Union - Article 6 **

*
Official Journal L 157 , 21/06/2005 P. 0019 - 0019 *

Article 6

This Treaty, drawn up in a single original in the Bulgarian, Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, Estonian, Finnish, French, German, Greek, Hungarian, Irish, Italian, Latvian, Lithuanian, Maltese, Polish, Portuguese, Romanian, Slovak, Slovenian, Spanish and Swedish languages, the texts in each of these languages being equally authentic, shall be deposited in the archives of the Government of the Italian Republic, which will remit a certified copy to each of the Governments of the other Signatory States.

--------------------------------------------------
# EUR-Lex - 12005SA022 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12005SA022

**Act concerning the conditions of accession of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania and the adjustments to the Treaties on which the European Union is founded - PART THREE:PERMANENT PROVISIONS - TITLE II:OTHER PROVISIONS - Article 22 **

*
Official Journal L 157 , 21/06/2005 P. 0210 - 0210 *

Article 22

The Council, acting unanimously on a proposal from the Commission and after consulting the European Parliament, may make the adaptations to the provisions of this Act relating to the common agricultural policy which may prove necessary as a result of a modification in Community rules.

--------------------------------------------------
BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

In the Matter of )

Sony Pictures Television, Inc.

)

)

AO 2023-10

Agenda Document No. 24-02-A

CERTIFICATION

I, Vicktoria J. Allen, recording secretary for the Federal Election Commission open 

meeting on January 11, 2024, do hereby certify that the Commission decided by a vote of 6-0 to 

approve Agenda Document No. 24-02-A, which is draft A.

Commissioners Broussard, Cooksey, Dickerson, Lindenbaum, Trainor, and Weintraub 

voted affirmatively for the decision.

Attest:

 January 11, 2024

Date Vicktoria J. Allen

Deputy Secretary of the Commission
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 184 (Friday, September 22, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 55476]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-8069]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information 
Technology; American Health Information Community Confidentiality, 
Privacy and Security Workgroup Meeting

ACTION: Announcement of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the third meeting of the American Health 
Information Community Confidentiality, Privacy and Security Workgroup 
in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 
5 U.S.C., App.)

DATES: October 6, 2006, from 11 a.m. to 2 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Mary C. Switzer Building (330 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 
20201), Conference Room 4090 (please bring photo ID for entry to a 
Federal building).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: http://www.hhs.gov/healthit/ahic.html.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION CONTACT: The workgroup members will discuss 
outcomes from the testimony hearing held on September 29, 2006, 
regarding identify proofing and user authentication.
    The meeting will be available via Web cast at http://www.eventcenterlive.com/cfmx/ec/login/loginl.cfm?BID=67.

    Dated: September 18, 2006.
Judith Sparrow,
Director, American Health Information Community, Office of Programs and 
Coordination, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information 
Technology.
[FR Doc. 06-8069 Filed 9-21-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150-24-M
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 99.2

                           PERSISTENCE SOFTWARE, INC.

                            CERTIFICATION PRUSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Persistence Software, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Christine Russell, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/ CHRISTINE RUSSELL
-----------------------
Christine Russell
Chief Financial Officer
May 15, 2003
| 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |
|--------|--------|

|   |   |
|--------|--------|

| Date: August 14, 2012 |   |
|-----------------------|--------|
|                  |   |
|                  |   | /s/ Timothy Rice |   |
|                  |   | Timothy Rice |   |
|                  |   | Chief Executive Officer and President (Principal Executive Officer) |   |
|                  |   |   |   |
|                  |   |   |   |
|                  |   |   |   |
|                  |   |   |   |
|                  |   |   |   |   |

----
**Exhibit 99.5:**

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-232601 on Form F-10, Registration Statement No. 333-232967 on Form F-3D and Registration Statement Nos. 333-125486 and 333-181463 on Form S-8 and to the use of our reports dated February 13, 2020 relating to the consolidated financial statements of TELUS Corporation (the “Company”) and the effectiveness of Company’s internal control over financial reporting appearing in this Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2019.

 

/s/ Deloitte LLP Chartered Professional Accountants Vancouver, Canada  February 13, 2020

 

----
#### § 217.152 Permissible methods of taking.

Under LOAs issued pursuant to §§ 216.106 of this chapter and 217.156, the Holders of the LOAs (hereinafter “Hilcorp” and “Eni”) may incidentally, but not intentionally, take marine mammals within the area described in § 217.150(b) by mortality, serious injury, Level A harassment, or Level B harassment associated with ice road and ice trail construction and maintenance activities, provided the activities are in compliance with all terms, conditions, and requirements of the regulations in this subpart and the appropriate LOAs.
#### In re Estate of Sarah E. Walkup. Joseph H. Walkup, appellant, v. Isabel Cornell, appellee.

Filed January 31, 1913.

No. 17,931.

Appeal from the district court for Douglas county: George A. Day, Judge.

*Dismissed.*

*John M. Maofarland*and *Charles E.*Foster, for appellant.

*John P.*Breen, *contra.*

*33Per Curiam.

When an appeal to this court is manifestly frivolous, the record presenting no debatable question, it will be dismissed upon motion.

Upon full hearing, all parties being represented, judgment was entered in the district court for Douglas county upon the pleadings. It appears from the pleadings that in the settlement of an estate of a deceased person in the probate court, while the matter was pending upon a motion for final distribution, the court was about to consider a deed conveying the interest of one heir to another, and an objection was filed to the deed on the ground that it was obtained by fraud. In the objection it was suggested that the objector intended to bring an action in the proper court to set aside the deed. Afterwards, the court having considered the matter from time to time for about three months and no action having been begun in a court having jurisdiction to set aside the deed, the probate court refused to delay the matter longer and entered an order of distribution. From that order the objector appealed to the district court. The above facts appear from his pleading, and upon the hearing a judgment was entered against the objector upon the pleadings. ■ No one will contend that the probate court had jurisdiction to set aside the conveyance on the ground that it was obtained by fraud, and if the probate court had no such jurisdiction the district court could not obtain it by appeal. The district court therefore manifestly did right in entering judgment upon the pleadings. The objector appealed to this court, and a motion is now presented to dismiss his appeal, which, for the reason above given, is sustained, and the appeal

Dismissed.
§ 665.667 Quotas. ( a ) *General.* The quotas limiting the amount of precious coral that may be taken in any precious coral permit area during the fishing year are listed in § 665.667(d). Only live coral is counted toward the quota. The accounting period for all quotas begins July 1, 1983.
( b ) *Conditional bed closure.* A conditional bed will be closed to all nonselective coral harvesting after the quota for one species of coral has been taken.
( c ) *Reserves and reserve release.* The quotas for exploratory area, X-P-PI, will be held in reserve for harvest by vessels of the United States in the following manner: ( 1 ) At the start of the fishing year, the reserve for the PRIA exploratory area will equal the quota minus the estimated domestic annual harvest for that year.
( 2 ) As soon as practicable after December 31 each year, the Regional Administrator will determine the amount harvested by vessels of the United States between July 1 and December 31 of the year that just ended on December 31.
( 3 ) NMFS will release to TALFF an amount of precious coral for each exploratory area equal to the quota minus two times the amount harvested by vessels of the United States in that July 1-December 31 period.
( 4 ) NMFS will publish in the Federal Register a notification of the Regional Administrator's determination and a summary of the information on which it is based as soon as practicable after the determination is made.
( d ) PRIA exploratory permit area, X-P-PI, has an annual quota of 1,000 kg for all precious coral MUS combined with the exception of black corals.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 5190 

To prohibit the procurement of certain batteries by the Department of State. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 25, 2024 

Mr. SCOTT of South Carolina (for himself and Mr. RUBIO) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

A BILL 

To prohibit the procurement of certain batteries by the 

Department of State. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Blocking Bad Bat5 teries Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

7 PROCUREMENT OF CERTAIN BATTERIES. 

8 (a) LIMITATION.—Beginning on October 1, 2027, 

9 none of the funds appropriated or otherwise made avail10 able for the Department of State may be obligated or exVerDate Sep 11 2014 04:51 Oct 09, 2024 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S5190.IS S5190

kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 5190 IS

1 pended to procure a battery produced by an entity speci2 fied in subsection (b). 

3 (b) ENTITIES SPECIFIED.—The entities specified in 

4 this subsection are the following: 

5 (1) Contemporary Amperex Technology Com6 pany, Limited (also known as ‘‘CATL’’). 

7 (2) BYD Company, Limited. 

8 (3) Envision Energy, Limited. 

9 (4) EVE Energy Company, Limited. 

10 (5) Gotion High tech Company, Limited. 

11 (6) Hithium Energy Storage Technology com12 pany, Limited. 

13 (7) Any successor to an entity specified in para14 graphs (1) through (6). 

15 (c) TREATMENT OF PRODUCTION.—For purposes of 

16 this section, a battery shall be treated as produced by an 

17 entity specified in subsection (b) if that entity— 

18 (1) assembles or manufactures the final prod19 uct; or 

20 (2) creates or otherwise provides a majority of 

21 the components used in the battery. 

22 (d) NATIONAL INTEREST WAIVER.—The Secretary of 

23 State may waive the limitation under subsection (a) if the 

24 Secretary submits to the Committee on Foreign Relations 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•S 5190 IS

1 of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of 

2 the House of Representatives— 

3 (1) a written determination that the waiver is 

4 important to the national interests of the United 

5 States; and 

6 (2) a detailed explanation of how such waiver is 

7 important to those interests. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           9,681
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   72,881
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     13,138
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               139,916
<PP&E>                                          42,198
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 261,487
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           75,385
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            27
<OTHER-SE>                                      91,361
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   261,487
<SALES>                                        269,806
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               269,806
<CGS>                                          206,816
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  206,816
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                60,287
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,402
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,120)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       801
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,921)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (3,080)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,001)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.25)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.25)
        

</TABLE>
#### § 42.142 Curve for obtaining Operating Characteristic (OC) curve information for skip lot sampling and inspection.

[![](https://img.federalregister.gov/EC02SE91.019/EC02SE91.019_large.png)](https://img.federalregister.gov/EC02SE91.019/EC02SE91.019_original_size.png)

Notes:

1. This curve applies only to the specific skip lot sampling and inspection plan described in [§§ 42.121](/on/2024-09-20/title-7/section-42.121) and [42.123](/on/2024-09-20/title-7/section-42.123).

2. Pa and Pas are essentially equal for values under 50 percent.

[[41 FR 42641](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/41-FR-42641), Sept. 28, 1976. Redesignated at [42 FR 32514](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/42-FR-32514), June 27, 1977 and further redesignated at [45 FR 69424](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/45-FR-69424), Oct. 21, 1980 and [46 FR 63203](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/46-FR-63203), Dec. 31, 1981]
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________ No. 97-1293EM

_____________ Charlotte Hoaglan, * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the Eastern v. * District of Missouri. * Hardee's Food Systems, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

_____________ Submitted: September 23, 1997

Filed: September 24, 1997

_____________ Before FAGG, BOWMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

_____________ PER CURIAM. Charlott e Hoaglan brought this personal injury lawsuit against Hardee's Foo d Systems after she spilled hot coffee on herself at a drive-through windo w. A jury found neither par

ty at fault. Hoaglan moved for a new trial based on her challenge to a jury instructio n. The district court denied the motion, and Hoaglan appeals. After careful review, we conclude the challenged instruction did not misstate Missouri law. Se e Baron v . Aftergut , 387 S.W.2d 535, 537-38 (Mo. 1965). In our view, the jury instructions fairly and adequately submitted the is sues in the case to the jury, see Jones v. Board of Police Comm'rs , 844 F.2d 500 , 504 (8th Cir. 1988), cert. denied , 490 U.S.-2-

1092 ( 1989), and the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Hoaglan' s motion for a new trial. We affirm the district court. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
# EUR-Lex - 12005SA057 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12005SA057

**Act concerning the conditions of accession of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania and the adjustments to the Treaties on which the European Union is founded - PART FIVE:PROVISIONS RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THIS ACT - TITLE II:APPLICABILITY OF THE ACTS OF THE INSTITUTIONS - Article 57 **

*
Official Journal L 157 , 21/06/2005 P. 0219 - 0219 *

Article 57

Unless otherwise stipulated, the Council, acting by a qualified majority on a proposal from the Commission, shall adopt the necessary measures to implement the provisions of this Act.

--------------------------------------------------
# Map            Sweden.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 5430 

To require the Secretary of the Interior to issue a right-of-way for an 

emergency exit on certain National Park Service land in the State of 

Virginia, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 5, 2024 

Mr. KAINE (for himself and Mr. WARNER) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of the Interior to issue a rightof-way for an emergency exit on certain National Park 

Service land in the State of Virginia, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Blue Ridge Fire Safety 

5 Act of 2024’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 5430 IS

1 SEC. 2. RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR EMERGENCY EXIT, BLUE RIDGE 

2 PARKWAY. 

3 Section 2 of the Act of June 30, 1936 (49 Stat. 2041, 

4 chapter 883; 54 Stat. 250, chapter 277; 16 U.S.C. 460a– 

5 3), is amended— 

6 (1) by striking ‘‘Secretary of the Interior may 

7 issue’’ and inserting the following: ‘‘Secretary of the 

8 Interior— 

9 ‘‘(1) may issue’’; and 

10 (2) by striking the period at the end and insert11 ing ‘‘; and’’; and 

12 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

13 ‘‘(2) shall issue the right-of-way generally de14 picted as ‘Proposed Egress’ on the map entitled 

15 ‘Proposed Wintergreen Emergency Egress Near 

16 Milepost 9.6’, numbered 601/194,694, and dated 

17 September 2024, if the Secretary certifies that— 

18 ‘‘(A) an evaluation has been completed of 

19 alternatives to the right-of-way for egress that 

20 do not cross Federal land that includes evalu21 ating whether existing trails can be converted to 

22 roads; 

23 ‘‘(B) an analysis of expected fire ecology 

24 behavior in the event of a fire emergency has 

25 been completed with respect to the right-of-way; 

26 and 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 5430 IS

1 ‘‘(C) any required reviews with respect to 

2 the right-of-way have been completed in accord3 ance with— 

4 ‘‘(i) the National Environmental Pol5 icy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.); 

6 and 

7 ‘‘(ii) division A of subtitle III of title 

8 54, United States Code.’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Abatement Order filed August 7, 2018 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-18-00599-CR

____________

MICHAEL JOHN BURKLAND, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from County Criminal Court at Law No. 2

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2107369

ABATEMENT ORDER

Appellant challenges the trial court’s order denying his motion to suppress. 

Although appellant requested findings of fact and conclusions of law, none have 

been filed. When the losing party on a motion to suppress requests findings of fact 

and conclusions of law, the trial court is required to make them. State v. Cullen, 195 

S.W.3d 696, 698–99 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). 

Accordingly, the trial court is directed to reduce to writing its findings of fact
and conclusions of law on the denial of appellant’s motion to suppress and have a

supplemental clerk’s record containing those findings filed with the clerk of this

court on or before September 6, 2018. If the trial court’s findings were dictated into

the record, the trial court is directed to include those findings in a supplemental

clerk’s record to be filed with the clerk of this court on or before September 6, 2018.

The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this court’s 

active docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this court’s active docket when the 

trial court’s findings and recommendations are filed in this court. The court will also 

consider an appropriate motion to reinstate the appeal filed by either party.

PER CURIAM
#### § 1229.3 What definitions apply to this part?

See § 1220.18 of this subchapter for definitions of terms used in part 1229.
#### § 1915.1013 beta-Propiolactone.

Note:

The requirements applicable to shipyard employment under this section are identical to those set forth at [§ 1910.1003 of this chapter](/on/2024-09-23/title-29/section-1910.1003).

[[61 FR 31430](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/61-FR-31430), June 20, 1996]