alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FLYING FIREMAN, INC

26117 34Th Avenue East, Spanaway, WA 98387

August 28, 2013

U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Operations, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., 

Washington, DC 20590

RE: Exemption from FAR 91-313 / Docket No. FAA-2011-1032 / Extension Request

Dear Mr. Glista: 

Flying Fireman is certificated under Part 137 and operates a PBY-6A (N85U), which has a restricted type 

certificate for agriculture or firefighting purposes. (TC AR-22). 

Flying Fireman was granted an exemption from Section 91.313(a) and (e) on December 16, 2011. The 

exemption is will expire on December 31, 2013. 

Flying Fireman is requesting that its exemption be extended an additional two years. There have been 

no changes at Flying Fireman. All the facts presented for the original exemption request are still 

accurate today. 

For further information, please contact me as follows:

Noel Rude

FLYING FIREMAN, INC.

26117 34Th Avenue East

Spanaway, WA 98387

Phone: 614-774-0782

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me directly. 

Regards, 

FLYING FIREMAN, INC.

Noel Rude

President
C-SAT 111087

Chemical Terms 2-Butenedioic acid (E)-, di-C8-18 (even numbered)-alkyl esters

(Trade) Name Fumarate 8/18

Active Matter [%]

Solvent

(Side-) components / 

impurities

Date of Manufacturing 16.02.2011

Expiry Date 16.02.2013

Batch S710370004

RIS

SIS

CAS 68610-90-2

Soluble/suspensible in

Color white

Aggregate state at RT Solid

pH-Value

Volatile at RT yes

Storage Room temperature

Cool

Deep frozen

Dark

Sponsor

Product steward

Possible risk and safety advices

Further information

This document is directed to USEPA pursuant the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). This document 

is the property of the sponsor and may be used only for that purpose intended by the sponsor and as 

authorized under applicable law. Every other or additional use, exploitation, reproduction, publication or 

submission to other parties requires the written permission of the sponsor, except as otherwise required 

by applicable law (e.g., TSCA). The use of these studies/documents for regulatory, registration or other 

commercial purposes [including but not limited to Registration, Evaluation, Authorization and 

Restriction of Chemical Substances (REACH)], without the express written permission of the sponsor is 

unauthorized and strictly prohibited.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7794

WILLIAM SAUNDERS SMITH, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

J. B. WILLIAMS; R. HILL, Officer; OFFICER

KNIGHT,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District

Judge. (CA-95-788-5-CT-BO)

Submitted: February 7, 1996 Decided: February 26, 1996

Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Saunders Smith, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Smith v. Williams, No. CA-95-788-5-CT-BO (E.D.N.C. Sept. 27,

1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# EUR-Lex - 12005SA035 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12005SA035

**Act concerning the conditions of accession of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania and the adjustments to the Treaties on which the European Union is founded - PART FOUR:TEMPORARY PROVISIONS - TITLE III:FINANCIAL PROVISIONS - Article 35 **

*
Official Journal L 157 , 21/06/2005 P. 0215 - 0215 *

Article 35

The amounts referred to in Articles 30, 31, 32, 33 and 34 shall be adjusted by the Commission each year in line with movements in prices as part of the annual technical adjustments to the financial perspective.

--------------------------------------------------
#### § 401.1 Administration.

The Director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the Director of the National Marine Fisheries Service shall jointly administer the Anadromous Fish Conservation Act for the Secretaries.
Editorial Note on Part 660
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 660 appear at 67 FR 65906, Oct. 29, 2002, 88 FR 81358, Nov. 22, 2023.

§ 660.509 Accountability measures (season closures). ( a ) *General rule for this subpart.* When the directed fishery allocation, incidental allocation, annual catch limit is reached for any CPS species, the fishery for that CPS species will be closed until the beginning of the next fishing period or season. The Regional Administrator shall announce in the Federal Register the date of such closure, as well as any incidental harvest level(s) recommended by the Council and approved by NMFS.
( b ) *Pacific Sardine.* When the allocation and reallocation levels for Pacific sardine in § 660.511(f) through (h) are reached, the Pacific sardine fishery shall be closed until either it re-opens per the allocation scheme in § 660.511(g) and (h) or the beginning of the next fishing season as stated in § 660.510(a). The Regional Administrator shall announce in the Federal Register the date of the closure of the directed fishery for Pacific sardine.
[76 FR 70364, Nov. 14, 2011, as amended at 84 FR 25202, May 31, 2019]
#### § 80.64 How does an agency allocate costs in multipurpose projects and facilities?

A State fish and wildlife agency must allocate costs in multipurpose projects based on the uses or benefits for each purpose that will result from the completed project or facility. The agency must describe the method used to allocate costs in multipurpose projects or facilities in the project statement included in the grant application.
# EUR-Lex - 12004V004 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V004

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART I - TITLE I — DEFINITION AND OBJECTIVES OF THE UNION - Article I-4 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0012 - 0012 *

Article I-4

Fundamental freedoms and non-discrimination

1. The free movement of persons, services, goods and capital, and freedom of establishment shall be guaranteed within and by the Union, in accordance with the Constitution.

2. Within the scope of the Constitution, and without prejudice to any of its specific provisions, any discrimination on grounds of nationality shall be prohibited.

--------------------------------------------------
#### §§ 1005.10-1005.12 [Reserved]
Editorial Note on Part 622
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 622 appear at 79 FR 57837, Sept. 26, 2014 and at 81 FR 32253, May 23, 2016.

§ 622.93 Adjustment of management measures. In accordance with the framework procedures of the FMP for the Red Drum Fishery of the Gulf of Mexico, the RA may establish or modify the following items: ( a ) Reporting and monitoring requirements, permitting requirements, bag and possession limits (including a bag limit of zero), size limits, vessel trip limits, closed seasons or areas and reopenings, annual catch limits (ACLs), annual catch targets (ACTs), quotas (including a quota of zero), accountability measures (AMs), MSY (or proxy), OY, TAC, management parameters such as overfished and overfishing definitions, gear restrictions (ranging from regulation to complete prohibition), gear markings and identification, vessel markings and identification, ABC and ABC control rules, rebuilding plans, sale and purchase restrictions, transfer at sea provisions, and restrictions relative to conditions of harvested fish (maintaining fish in whole condition, use as bait).
( b ) [Reserved]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0085

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

SHELLY LYNN PARSONS,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including July 25, 2022, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 17 2022

06/17/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0085
# EUR-Lex - 12005SP015 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12005SP015

**Protocol concerning the conditions and arrangements for admission of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania to the European Union - PART TWO:ADJUSTMENTS TO THE CONSTITUTION - TITLE II:OTHER ADJUSTMENTS - Article 15 **

*
Official Journal L 157 , 21/06/2005 P. 0034 - 0034 *

Article 15

1. The following subparagraph shall be added to Article IV-448(1) of the Constitution:

"Pursuant to the Accession Treaty, the Bulgarian and Romanian versions of this Treaty shall also be authentic."

2. The second paragraph of Article 225 of the EAEC Treaty shall be replaced by the following:

"The Bulgarian, Czech, Danish, English, Estonian, Finnish, Greek, Hungarian, Irish, Latvian, Lithuanian, Maltese, Polish, Portuguese, Romanian, Slovak, Slovenian, Spanish and Swedish versions of this Treaty shall also be authentic."

--------------------------------------------------
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Biophan Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended November 30, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Robert J. Wood, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of
my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

January 14, 2005


/s/Robert J. Wood
-------------------
Robert J. Wood
Chief Financial Officer


                                       22
Editorial Note on Part 679
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 679 appear at 61 FR 56438, Nov. 1, 1996; 62 FR 2047, Jan. 15, 1997; 66 FR 27909, May 21, 2001; 67 FR 79739, Dec. 30, 2002; and 77 FR 6502, Feb. 8, 2012.

§ 679.94 Economic data report (EDR) for the Amendment 80 sector. ( a ) *Annual Trawl Catcher/Processor Economic Data Report (EDR)* — ( 1 ) *Requirement to submit an EDR.* A person who held an Amendment 80 QS permit during a calendar year must submit a complete Annual Trawl Catcher/Processor EDR for that calendar year by following the instructions on the Annual Trawl Catcher/Processor EDR form.
( 2 ) *Deadline.* A completed EDR or EDR certification pages must be submitted as required on the form to NMFS for each calendar year on or before 1700 hours, A.l.t., June 1 of the following year.
( 3 ) *Information required.* The Annual Trawl Catcher/Processor EDR form is available on the NMFS Alaska Region Web site at *www.alaskafisheries.noaa.gov ,* or by contacting NMFS at 1-800-304-4846.
( 4 ) *EDR certification pages.* Any person required to submit an EDR under paragraph (a)(1) of this section, or their designated representative, if applicable, must submit the EDR certification statement as either: ( i ) *Part of the entire EDR.* A person submitting the completed EDR must attest to the accuracy and completion of the EDR by signing and dating the certification portion of the EDR form; or
( ii ) *EDR certification only.* A person submitting a completed EDR certification only must attest that they meet the conditions exempting them from submitting the entire EDR as described in the certification portion of the Annual Trawl Catcher/Processor EDR form and sign and date the certification portion of the EDR form.
( b ) *Verification of EDR data.* ( 1 ) NMFS or the DCA will conduct verification of information with a person required to submit the Annual Trawl Catcher/Processor EDR, or if applicable, that person's designated representative.
( 2 ) A person required to submit the Annual Trawl Catcher/Processor EDR or designated representative, if applicable, must respond to inquiries by NMFS, the DCA within 20 days of the date of issuance of the inquiry.
[79 FR 71318, Dec. 2, 2014, as amended at 88 FR 7591, Feb. 6, 2023]
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

Washington, DC 20463 

4 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

29 

30 

31 

32 

33 

34 

35 

36 

37 

MEMORANDUM 

TO: 

FROM: 

The Conunission 

Lisa Stevenson jL 

Acting General Counsel 

Kathleen Guith 

Associate General Counsel for Enforcement 

Mark Shonkwiler ^^^5* 

Assistant General Counsel 

Antoinette Fuoto 

Staff Attomey 

SUBJECT: MUR 6920 (Government Integrity, LLC) 

RE: Office of the General Counsel's Notice to Commission and Respondents 

Following the Submission of Probable Cause Briefs 

On September 21, 2017, the Office of the General Coimsel ("OGC") notified 

Government. Integrity, LLC ("GI LLC") that it was prepared to recommend that the Commission 

find probable cause to believe tliat GI LLC knowingly and willfully violated 

52 U.S.C. § 30122 and 11 C.F.R. § 110.4(b)(l)(i) by making a contribution in the name of 

another.' OGC's notification included a General Coimsel's Brief setting forth the factual and 

legal basis for the recommendation. On October 6, 2017, GI LLC submitted a reply brief. 

Pursuant to the Agency Procediu:e Following tire Submission of Probable Cause Briefs by 

the Office of General Comisel. 76 Fed. Reg. 63,570 (Oct. 13, 2011), OGC is hereby notifying the 

Commission that it intends to proceed with the recommendation to find probable cause to believe 

tliat GI LLC violated 52 U.S.C. § 30122 and 11 C.F.R. § 110.4(b)(l)(i) based on the factual and 

legal analysis set forth in the General Counsel's Brief. 

A copy of this Notice is being provided to the Respondents at the same time that it is 

circulated to the Commission. 

' 5ee 52 U.S.C. § 30109(a)('3); 11 C.F.R. § 111.16(a); se^ also Agency Procedure Following the Submission 

fo Probable Cause Briefs by the Office of General Counsel, 76 Fed. Reg. 63,570 (Oct. 13,2011). 
MUR 6920 (Government Integrity, LLC) 

OGC Probable Cause Notice 

Page 2 

1 RECOMMENDATION 

2 

3 Find probable cause to believe that Government Integrity, LLC knowingly and willfully 

4 violated 52 U.S.C. § 30122 and 11 C.F.R. § 110.4(b)(l)(i).
Case 16-26645 Doc 1 Filed 08/19/16 Entered 08/19/16 09:43:56 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 11
Case 16-26645 Doc 1 Filed 08/19/16 Entered 08/19/16 09:43:56 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 11
Case 16-26645 Doc 1 Filed 08/19/16 Entered 08/19/16 09:43:56 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 11
Case 16-26645 Doc 1 Filed 08/19/16 Entered 08/19/16 09:43:56 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 11
Case 16-26645 Doc 1 Filed 08/19/16 Entered 08/19/16 09:43:56 Desc Main

 Document Page 5 of 11
Case 16-26645 Doc 1 Filed 08/19/16 Entered 08/19/16 09:43:56 Desc Main

 Document Page 6 of 11
Case 16-26645 Doc 1 Filed 08/19/16 Entered 08/19/16 09:43:56 Desc Main

 Document Page 7 of 11
Case 16-26645 Doc 1 Filed 08/19/16 Entered 08/19/16 09:43:56 Desc Main

 Document Page 8 of 11
Case 16-26645 Doc 1 Filed 08/19/16 Entered 08/19/16 09:43:56 Desc Main

 Document Page 9 of 11
Case 16-26645 Doc 1 Filed 08/19/16 Entered 08/19/16 09:43:56 Desc Main

 Document Page 10 of 11
Case 16-26645 Doc 1 Filed 08/19/16 Entered 08/19/16 09:43:56 Desc Main

 Document Page 11 of 11
Case 16-27698 Doc 10 Filed 08/31/16 Entered 09/02/16 13:48:43 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000868263
<NAME> VISTA EYECARE, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-02-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-04-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-02-1999
<CASH>                                           7,072
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,651
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,516
<INVENTORY>                                     31,670
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                51,776
<PP&E>                                         106,348
<DEPRECIATION>                                  48,305
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 229,097
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           47,568
<BONDS>                                        136,832
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           212
<OTHER-SE>                                      44,485
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   229,097
<SALES>                                        245,331
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               245,331
<CGS>                                          112,929
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  112,929
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               121,413
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,538
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,451
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,037
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,414
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,414
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .16
        

</TABLE>
Case 16-28042 Doc 1 Filed 08/31/16 Entered 08/31/16 15:53:23 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 10
Case 16-28042 Doc 1 Filed 08/31/16 Entered 08/31/16 15:53:23 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 10
Case 16-28042 Doc 1 Filed 08/31/16 Entered 08/31/16 15:53:23 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 10
Case 16-28042 Doc 1 Filed 08/31/16 Entered 08/31/16 15:53:23 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 10
Case 16-28042 Doc 1 Filed 08/31/16 Entered 08/31/16 15:53:23 Desc Main

 Document Page 5 of 10
Case 16-28042 Doc 1 Filed 08/31/16 Entered 08/31/16 15:53:23 Desc Main

 Document Page 6 of 10
Case 16-28042 Doc 1 Filed 08/31/16 Entered 08/31/16 15:53:23 Desc Main

 Document Page 7 of 10
Case 16-28042 Doc 1 Filed 08/31/16 Entered 08/31/16 15:53:23 Desc Main

 Document Page 8 of 10
Case 16-28042 Doc 1 Filed 08/31/16 Entered 08/31/16 15:53:23 Desc Main

 Document Page 9 of 10
Case 16-28042 Doc 1 Filed 08/31/16 Entered 08/31/16 15:53:23 Desc Main

 Document Page 10 of 10
#### § 1201.35 Will the collection of a claim by salary offset act as a waiver of my rights to dispute the claimed debt?

No, your involuntary payment of all or any portion of a debt under this subpart will not be construed as a waiver of any rights that you may have under 5 U.S.C. 5514 or other provisions of a law or written contract, unless there are statutory or contractual provisions to the contrary.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Integrated Environmental Technologies, Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, David R. LaVance, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)           the Report fully complies with the requirements of §13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, 15 U.S.C. §78m or 78o(d), and,





(2)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:  August 14, 2012
By:
/s/ David R. LaVanceDavid R. LaVancePresident and Chief Executive Officer
Case 16-30018 Doc 1 Filed 09/21/16 Entered 09/21/16 09:37:25 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 10
Case 16-30018 Doc 1 Filed 09/21/16 Entered 09/21/16 09:37:25 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 10
Case 16-30018 Doc 1 Filed 09/21/16 Entered 09/21/16 09:37:25 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 10
Case 16-30018 Doc 1 Filed 09/21/16 Entered 09/21/16 09:37:25 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 10
Case 16-30018 Doc 1 Filed 09/21/16 Entered 09/21/16 09:37:25 Desc Main

 Document Page 5 of 10
Case 16-30018 Doc 1 Filed 09/21/16 Entered 09/21/16 09:37:25 Desc Main

 Document Page 6 of 10
Case 16-30018 Doc 1 Filed 09/21/16 Entered 09/21/16 09:37:25 Desc Main

 Document Page 7 of 10
Case 16-30018 Doc 1 Filed 09/21/16 Entered 09/21/16 09:37:25 Desc Main

 Document Page 8 of 10
Case 16-30018 Doc 1 Filed 09/21/16 Entered 09/21/16 09:37:25 Desc Main

 Document Page 9 of 10
Case 16-30018 Doc 1 Filed 09/21/16 Entered 09/21/16 09:37:25 Desc Main

 Document Page 10 of 10
#### § 29.200 Can I, as operator, appeal Service decisions?

Yes. If you disagree with a decision made by the Service under this subpart, you may use the appeals process in § 25.45 of this subchapter. The process set forth in § 25.45 will be used for appeal of any written decision concerning approval, denial, or modification of an operation made by the Service under this subpart. No Service decision under this subpart that is subject to appeal to the Regional Director or the Director shall be considered final agency action subject to judicial review under 5 U.S.C. 704 until the Regional Director has rendered his or her decision on the matter. The decision of the Regional Director will constitute the Service's final agency action, and no further appeal will lie in the Department from that decision.
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT JOSE GUADALUPE M ENDOZAM AR IN, Pe titione r, v. ER IC H. HOLDER , Jr., Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R

e sponde n t . No. 11-73747 Age n c y No. A077-056-703 M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Subm itte d M arc h 12, 2013 ** B e fore : PR EGER SON, REINHAR DT, a n d W . FLETC HER , C irc uit Judge s. Jose Gua da lupe M e ndoz a -M arin, a native and c itiz e n of M e xic o, pe titions for re vie w of the B o a

rd of Im m igration Appe a ls’ (“ B IA” ) orde r de ny ing his m otion to re o pe n b a se d on ine ffe c tive a s sista nc e of c ounse l . W e have jurisdic tion



# FIL ED APR 11 2014 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S . CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).unde r 8 U.S.C . § 1252. W e re v ie w for a b use of disc re tion thede nia l of a m otion to re ope n , a nd re v ie w de novo que stions of la w. Mohamme d v . Gonzale s , 400 F.3d 785, 791-92 (9th C ir. 2005). W e de ny the pe tition for re vie w. The B IA did not a

buse its disc re tion in de ny ing M e ndoz a -M arin’ s m o tion to re ope n whe re he fa i le d to e sta

blish pre judic e arising from

any a l le ge d ine ffe c tive a ssista nc e by his form e r attorne y s. Se e id . at 793-94 (“ [P] re j udic e re sults whe n the pe rform a nc e of c o unse l wa s so ina de quate tha t it may hav e a ffe c te d the outc om e of the p roc e e dings.” (e m

pha s is in original) (inte rna l quota tion m arks om i tte d)). PE T IT IO N FO R RE V IE WDE NIE D.

1 1 - 7 3 7 4 7 2