alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 253.53 Other funds. ( a ) *Funds for disaster assistance.* ( 1 ) The Secretary shall retain sole authority in distributing any disaster assistance funds made available under section 308(b) of the Act. The Secretary may distribute these funds after he or she has made a thorough evaluation of the scientific information submitted, and has determined that a commercial fishery failure of a fishery resource arising from natural or undetermined causes has occurred. Funds may only be used to restore the resource affected by the disaster, and only by existing methods and technology. Any fishery resource used in computing the states' amount under the apportionment formula in § 253.601(a) will qualify for funding under this section. The Federal share of the cost of any activity conducted under the disaster provision of the Act shall be limited to 75 percent of the total cost.
( 2 ) In addition, pursuant to section 308(d) of the Act, the Secretary is authorized to award grants to persons engaged in commercial fisheries for uninsured losses determined by the Secretary to have been suffered as a direct result of a fishery resource disaster. Funds may be distributed by the Secretary only after notice and opportunity for public comment of the appropriate limitations, terms, and conditions for awarding assistance under this section. Assistance provided under this section is limited to 75 percent of an uninsured loss to the extent that such losses have not been compensated by other Federal or State Programs.
( b ) *Funds for interstate commissions.* Funds authorized to support the efforts of the three chartered Interstate Marine Fisheries Commissions to develop and maintain interstate fishery management plans for interjurisdictional fisheries will be divided equally among the Commissions.
#### § 2590.712-1 xxx

###### Cross Reference

Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 77731, Sept. 23, 2024.
#### § 1150.3 Policy of amicable resolution.

The policy of the Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board is to maximize the accessibility and usability of buildings, and facilities through amicable means. To this end, the Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board encourages voluntary and informal resolution of all complaints.
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350  (as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ TIMOTHY RICETimothy RiceChief Executive Officer and President 
(Principal Executive Officer)  Exhibit 32.1
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Biophan Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 30, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Michael L. Weiner, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to the best
of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec.
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

January 17, 2006




                             /s/Michael L. Weiner
                             ----------------------
                             Michael L. Weiner
                             Chief Executive Officer
#### § 91.14 Restrictions on subject matter for entry.

A live portrayal of any bird(s) of the five or fewer identified eligible waterfowl species must be the dominant feature of the design. The design may depict more than one of the eligible species. The judges' overall mandate is to select the best design that will make an interesting, useful, and attractive duck stamp that will be accepted and prized by hunters, stamp collectors, conservationists, and others. The design must be the contestant's original hand-drawn creation. The entry design may not be copied or duplicated from previously published art, including photographs, or from images in any format published on the internet. Photographs, computer-generated art, or art produced from a computer printer or other computer/mechanical output device (airbrush method excepted) are not eligible to be entered into the contest and will be disqualified. An entry submitted in a prior contest that was not selected for a Federal or State stamp design may be submitted in the current contest if the entry meets the criteria set forth in this section.

[86 FR 47596, Aug. 26, 2021]
Case 16-26645 Doc 14 Filed 09/14/16 Entered 09/15/16 07:32:28 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
# EUR-Lex - 12004V399 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V399

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART III — THE POLICIES AND FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - TITLE VI — THE FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - CHAPTER I — PROVISIONS GOVERNING THE INSTITUTIONS - Section 4 — Provisions common to Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies - Article III-399 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0172 - 0172 *

Article III-399

1. The institutions, bodies, offices and agencies of the Union shall ensure transparency in their work and shall, pursuant to Article I-50, determine in their rules of procedure specific provisions for public access to their documents. The Court of Justice of the European Union, the European Central Bank and the European Investment Bank shall be subject to the provisions of Article I-50(3) and to this Article only when exercising their administrative tasks.

2. The European Parliament and the Council shall ensure publication of the documents relating to the legislative procedures under the terms laid down by the European law referred to in Article I-50(3).

--------------------------------------------------
Document

Exhibit 10.4
Form of Consent to Temporary Wage Reduction 


____________, 2020
As of the date hereof, I voluntarily consent to Ribbon Communications Inc.’s and its subsidiaries’ (collectively, “Ribbon” or the “Company”) reduction of my current base salary in an amount equal to  20%1 beginning in the first payroll cycle following May 15, 2020 (the “Temporary Wage Reduction”).  I understand and agree that this Temporary Wage Reduction is a result of the current economic downturn impacting the Company’s business. I further understand that the Temporary Wage Reduction will be in effect for at least 60 days, but in any event as long as it takes the Company to recover from the current economic downturn. I acknowledge that, to the extent possible and legally permissible, the Temporary Wage Reduction will not result in a reduction in compensation based employer and employee contributions to employee benefits schemes in which I am a participant.   
I understand that my consent or refusal to consent to the Temporary Wage Reduction does not prohibit the Company from taking lawful cost reduction measures in the future, including during the Temporary Wage Reduction.  I further understand that if: (i) I am laid off in a reduction in force or otherwise terminated due to no fault of my own during the Temporary Wage Reduction period; and (ii) I am eligible for severance under an agreement with, or policy of, the Company as a result of such termination, I will receive Company paid severance under the terms and conditions of such agreement or policy calculated based on my regular base salary as if the Temporary Wage Reduction had never occurred.  
I further agree that, by consenting to this Temporary Wage Reduction, I cannot subsequently claim that such a reduction constitutes a basis, in part or in whole, for a “Good Reason” termination under my severance agreement (or any similar voluntary resignation that may result in severance or similar payments under an employment or similar agreement or arrangement), constructive dismissal, breach of contract, or other violation of applicable law. 
Finally, I understand and agree that my current base salary is amended by this consent until the Temporary Wage Reduction is no longer in effect.   
[To be acknowledged and date stamped]

1 50% with respect to the President & Chief Executive Officer


|US-DOCS\115747749.4||
# EUR-Lex - 12002E033 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 12002E033

**Treaty establishing the European Community (Nice consolidated version) - Part Three: Community policies - Title II: Agriculture - Article 33 - Article 39 - EC Treaty (Maastricht consolidated version) - Article 39 - EEC Treaty **

*
Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0048 - 0049 Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0190 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0017 - Consolidated version (EEC Treaty - no official publication available) *

Treaty establishing the European Community (Nice consolidated version)

Part Three: Community policies

Title II: Agriculture

Article 33

Article 39 - EC Treaty (Maastricht consolidated version)

Article 39 - EEC Treaty

Article 33

1. The objectives of the common agricultural policy shall be:

(a) to increase agricultural productivity by promoting technical progress and by ensuring the rational development of agricultural production and the optimum utilisation of the factors of production, in particular labour;

(b) thus to ensure a fair standard of living for the agricultural community, in particular by increasing the individual earnings of persons engaged in agriculture;

(c) to stabilise markets;

(d) to assure the availability of supplies;

(e) to ensure that supplies reach consumers at reasonable prices.

2. In working out the common agricultural policy and the special methods for its application, account shall be taken of:

(a) the particular nature of agricultural activity, which results from the social structure of agriculture and from structural and natural disparities between the various agricultural regions;

(b) the need to effect the appropriate adjustments by degrees;

(c) the fact that in the Member States agriculture constitutes a sector closely linked with the economy as a whole.
Editorial Note on Part 172
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 172 appear at 61 FR 14482, Apr. 2, 1996; 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001; 66 FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001; 68 FR 15355, Mar. 31, 2003; 70 FR 40880, July 15, 2005; 70 FR 67651, Nov. 8, 2005; 70 FR 72074, Dec. 1, 2005; and 81 FR 49896, July 29, 2016.

§ 172.325 Bakers yeast protein. Bakers yeast protein may be safely used in food in accordance with the following conditions: ( a ) Bakers yeast protein is the insoluble proteinaceous material remaining after the mechanical rupture of yeast cells of *Saccharomyces cerevisiae* and removal of whole cell walls by centrifugation and separation of soluble cellular materials.
( b ) The additive meets the following specifications on a dry weight basis: ( 1 ) Zinc salts less than 500 parts per million (ppm) as zinc.
( 2 ) Nucleic acid less than 2 percent.
( 3 ) Less than 0.3 ppm arsenic, 0.1 ppm cadmium, 0.4 ppm lead, 0.05 ppm mercury, and 0.3 ppm selenium.
( c ) The viable microbial content of the finished ingredient is: ( 1 ) Less than 10,000 organisms/gram by aerobic plate count.
( 2 ) Less than 10 yeasts and molds/gram.
( 3 ) Negative for *Salmonella, E. coli,* coagulase positive *Staphylococci, Clostridium perfringens, Clostridium botulinum,* or any other recognized microbial pathogen or any harmful microbial toxin.
( d ) The ingredient is used in food as a nutrient supplement as defined in § 170.3(o)(20) of this chapter.
# EUR-Lex - 12005SP024 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12005SP024

**Protocol concerning the conditions and arrangements for admission of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania to the European Union - PART FOUR:TEMPORARY PROVISIONS - TITLE II:INSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS - Article 24 **

*
Official Journal L 157 , 21/06/2005 P. 0036 - 0036 *

Article 24

In Article 7 of Protocol No 34 on the transitional provisions relating to the institutions and bodies of the Union, annexed to the Constitution and to the EAEC Treaty, the following shall be inserted between the entries for Belgium and the Czech Republic:

"Bulgaria 12"

and, between the entries for Portugal and Slovenia:

"Romania 15".

--------------------------------------------------
r ~('l'":!\/f.l'\. 

F

,-. .., • I J, :, 

! . ', I ;'- ... \.,.lo • .. ·. , I j, N . '\'J 

BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSIO.l1i7 '~~? -6 AM /0: l 7 

In the Matter of 

American Conservative Union, et al.: 

Circulation of Discovery Documents -

Deposition Subpoena for Gregg Keller 

) 

) MUR 6920 

) 

) 

) 

CELA 

CERTIFICATION 

I, Laura E. Sinram, Acting Deputy Secretary of the Federal Election 

Commission, do hereby certify that on September O 1, 2017, the Commission 

decided by a vote of 5-0 to approve the deposition subpoena for Gregg Keller to 

obtain information about his communications and agreements regarding the 

funds ACU received from GI LLC, and the funds ACU sent to Now or Never 

PAC, on October 31, 2012, as recommended in the Memorandum from the 

Acting General Counsel dated August 28, 2017. 

Commissioners Goodman, Hunter, Petersen, Walther, and Weintraub voted 

affirmatively for the decision. 

Date 

Attest: 

~2mE?.~~ 

Acting Deputy Secretary of the 

Commission
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 95-21046

_____________________

SEGUROS COMERCIAL AMERICA S A DE C V,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

AMERICAN PRESIDENT LINES LTD,

Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

_________________________________________________________________

June 28, 1996

Before KING, JOLLY, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The district court has provided the litigants and this court

with a careful opinion addressing each of the issues raised by

Seguros Comercial America S.A. de C.V. (“Seguros”) in the

district court. Seguros reurges those issues here by claiming

that its case should have been transferred to Laredo and not

dismissed for forum non conveniens. We have reviewed the briefs

and the record and we think that the district court did not abuse

its discretion when it dismissed the case on the basis of forum

non conveniens. 

Seguros raises one additional argument on appeal. 
2

Specifically, it argues that:

Under Texas law, once a foreign corporation has

standing to sue, the doctrine of forum non conveniens

does not apply. Since a federal court exercising

diversity jurisdiction must look to state law to

determine standing to sue, the doctrine of forum non

conveniens similarly has no application in a Texas

federal court to a Texas authorized foreign corporate

plaintiff.

Seguros recognizes that the federal law on forum non

conveniens governs in diversity cases, but it argues that this

case should present an “exception to the general rule.” We have

considered this argument for crafting an exception, but we find

it unpersuasive.

The district court concluded that an adequate and alternative

forum is available and that the ends of justice would be best

served in this alternative forum. Citing to a letter that

discusses a type of statute of limitations problem, allegedly

nonwaivable, Seguros claims that the district court abused its

discretion by not retaining jurisdiction in the event a Mexican

court refuses to hear the case. The district court crafted a

judgment that addressed any statute of limitations problem as

best it could, and we find no abuse of discretion in the manner

any such problem is dealt with.

Seguros also states that the stipulations incorporated by

reference in the dismissal order are unacceptable to Mexican

courts unless they are certified by the clerk of the district

court. The request that the stipulations be formally
3

incorporated into a conditional dismissal order is a reasonable

one. Therefore, we direct the parties to the suit to arrive at

an amended form of judgment to be submitted to the district court

for entry within one week after the issuance of our mandate.

We VACATE the district court’s judgment and REMAND with

instructions to enter an amended judgment, to be prepared by the

parties, formally incorporating the stipulations. Costs shall be

borne by Seguros.

VACATED and REMANDED.
Case 16-29306 Doc 4 Filed 09/14/16 Entered 09/14/16 13:58:32 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2
Case 16-29306 Doc 4 Filed 09/14/16 Entered 09/14/16 13:58:32 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2
#### § 82.12 Permit requirements.

No work shall commence on a proposal funded under the provisions of 16 U.S.C. 1380 until all appropriate State and Federal permits have been applied for and issued.
#### § 42.123 Flow diagram for skip lot sampling and inspection.

[![](https://img.federalregister.gov/EC02SE91.000/EC02SE91.000_large.png)](https://img.federalregister.gov/EC02SE91.000/EC02SE91.000_original_size.png)

Notes:

1. Only normal inspection is permitted.

2. All lot selections for the one-half and one-fourth sampling rates must be strictly random (for example, not every other lot or every fourth lot).

3. Two exceptions to the procedures shown above are as follows:

(a) The skip lot sampling and inspection rate of one-half can be instituted immediately if the lots from the producer are currently on, or eligible to be on, reduced inspection and all other conditions in [§ 42.120](/on/2024-09-20/title-7/section-42.120) are met. When skip lot inspection begins, however, only normal inspection is permitted.

(b) While inspecting every lot consecutively as offered for inspection, i.e., while not on the one-half or one-fourth rate, if requirements for switching from normal to tightened inspection are met as specified in [§ 42.108](/on/2024-09-20/title-7/section-42.108) then skip lot procedures terminate, tightened inspection is initiated, and stationary lot sampling and inspection procedures in Subpart B are instituted. Skip lot procedures may be instituted again only when all conditions of [§ 42.120](/on/2024-09-20/title-7/section-42.120) are met.
# EUR-Lex - 12006E082 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12006E082

**Treaty establishing the European Community (consolidated version) - Part Three - Community policies - TITLE VI - Common rules on competition, taxation and approximation of laws - Chapter 1 - Rules on competition - Section 1 - Rules applying to undertakings - Article 82 **

*
Official Journal C 321 E , 29/12/2006 P. 0074 - 0075 Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0065 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0209 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0029 - Consolidated version (EEC Treaty - no official publication available) *

Article 82

Any abuse by one or more undertakings of a dominant position within the common market or in a substantial part of it shall be prohibited as incompatible with the common market in so far as it may affect trade between Member States.

Such abuse may, in particular, consist in:

(a) directly or indirectly imposing unfair purchase or selling prices or other unfair trading conditions;

(b) limiting production, markets or technical development to the prejudice of consumers;

(c) applying dissimilar conditions to equivalent transactions with other trading parties, thereby placing them at a competitive disadvantage;

(d) making the conclusion of contracts subject to acceptance by the other parties of supplementary obligations which, by their nature or according to commercial usage, have no connection with the subject of such contracts.

--------------------------------------------------
#### § 84.41 Who prepares a grant agreement? What needs to be included?

The coastal State and the Fish and Wildlife Service work together to develop a Grant Agreement (Form 3-1552) upon completion of the review by the Regional Director to determine compliance with applicable Federal laws and regulations. The Grant Agreement includes the grant title, the grant cost distribution, the agreement period, other grant provisions, and special grant conditions. If a Coastal Barrier Unit is affected, the Service must conduct internal consultations pursuant to Section 6 of the Coastal Barrier Resources Act, as amended by the Coastal Barrier Improvement Act, prior to providing any grant monies to that State.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             JAN-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                FEB-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                  JAN-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                         1
<CASH>                                                  0
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       3,395
<ALLOWANCES>                                          708
<INVENTORY>                                        64,482
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   70,133
<PP&E>                                             16,305
<DEPRECIATION>                                      3,374
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     93,533
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              44,309
<BONDS>                                            21,267
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                               10
<OTHER-SE>                                         37,497
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       93,533
<SALES>                                           155,474
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  155,474
<CGS>                                              91,134
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      91,134
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   45,309
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    1,037
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  6,993
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    12,038
<INCOME-TAX>                                        4,695
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 7,343
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    10,057
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                       17,400
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        2.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        2.05
                                               


</TABLE>