alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 21
 STATE OF INCORPORATIONSUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
    
    OR ORGANIZATIONMaverick Tube, L.P.
    
    DelawareMaverick Investment, LLC
    
    DelawareMaverick GP, LLC
    
    DelawareMaverick C&P, Inc.
    
    DelawareMaverick Tube International Holdings, Inc.
    
    DelawareMaverick Tube Canada GP Ltd.
    
    AlbertaMaverick Tube Canada LP
    
    AlbertaPrudential Steel Ltd.
    
    AlbertaPrecision Tube Holding, LLC
    
    DelawarePrecision Tube Technology, L.P.
    
    TexasPrecision GP, LLC
    
    DelawarePrecision Tube Canada Limited
    
    AlbertaPrecision Tube Technology Limited
    
    ScotlandSEAC Acquisition, LLC
    
    DelawareSeaCAT, L.P.
    
    TexasRepublic Conduit Holding, LLC
    
    DelawareHickman Pipe Coating, LLC
    
    ArkansasPennsylvania Cold Drawn Corporation
    
    DelawareTubos del Caribe Ltda.
    
    ColombiaTubulares de Colombia Ltda.
    
    ColombiaTubular Transport Services Inc.
    
    DelawareAdvanceCo LP
    
    DelawareAdvance Tubular de Venezuela ATV, C.A.
    
    VenezuelaAdvance Tubular de Ecuador S.A.
    
    EcuadorConsorcio Metalúrgico Nacional Ltda.
    
    ColombiaMaverick Tube Latino America, SRL
    
    VenezuelaMaverick Tube Mexico S de R.L. de C.V.
    
    MexicoInternational Growth Partners S. de R.L.
    
    PanamaInternational Growth Investors Ltd.
    
    British Virgin IslandsSelect Growth Partners S. de R.L.
    
    PanamaSelect Common Partners Ltd.
    
    British Virgin IslandsMaverick Tube Canada ULC
    
    Nova ScotiaRepublic Conduit Manufacturing
    
    Kentucky partnership
Order filed May 2, 2014.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-14-00223-CV

____________

IN THE INTEREST OF D.C., a Minor Child

On Appeal from the 257th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2012-05172J

ORDER

This is an accelerated appeal from a judgment in a suit in which the 

termination of the parent-child relationship is at issue. The notice of appeal was 

filed March 17, 2014, and appellant’s motion for extension of time to file the 

notice of appeal was granted. Appellant has established indigence or is presumed 

to be indigent. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.1(a). The reporter’s record was due within 

10 days after the notice of appeal was filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1(b); 

28.4(a)(1). When the record was not timely filed, this court issued an order to 

Tiffani Yeates, the court reporter on this case, to file the record on or before April 

28, 2014. The record was not filed by the due date set out in the order.
Appeals in parental termination cases and child protection cases are to be 

brought to final disposition within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal is 

filed. See Tex. R. Jud. Admin. 6.2(a). The trial and appellate courts are jointly 

responsible for ensuring that the appellate record is timely filed. See Tex. R. App. 

P. 35.3(c). The trial court must direct the court reporter to immediately commence 

the preparation of the reporter’s record and must arrange for a substitute reporter, 

if necessary. See Tex. R. App. P. 28.4(b)(1). 

Because the reporter’s record was not filed timely in this accelerated appeal, 

on April 30, 2014, we issued an order abating the appeal for the trial court to 

conduct a hearing. On May 1, 2014, Tiffani Yeates filed a request for an extension 

of time to file the record until May 19, 2014. We REINSTATE the appeal and 

GRANT the request. The reporter’s record is due May 19, 2014. NO FURTHER 

EXTENSIONS WILL BE GRANTED ABSENT EXCEPTIONAL 

CIRCUMSTANCES. 

The hearing requested in our April 30, 2014, is not required at this time. If 

Tiffani Yeates fails to timely file the reporter’s record in accordance with this 

order, the court will consider contempt proceedings and further orders will issue.

PER CURIAM
[Cite as State v. Butler, 2019-Ohio-1045.]

 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 

 TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO 

 BUTLER COUNTY 

STATE OF OHIO, : 

 Appellee, : CASE NO. CA2018-03-049 

 : D E C I S I O N 

 - vs - 03/25/2019 

 : 

KEVIN BUTLER, : 

 Appellant. : 

CRIMINAL APPEAL FROM BUTLER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS 

Case No. CR2016-11-1622 

Michael T. Gmoser, Butler County Prosecuting Attorney, Government Services Center, 315 

High Street, 11th Floor, Hamilton, OH 45011-6057, for appellee 

Charles M. Conliff, Post Office Box 18424, Fairfield, OH 48018, for appellant 

 Per Curiam.

{¶1} This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal filed by 

appellant, Kevin Butler, the transcript of the docket and journal entries, the transcript of 

proceedings and original papers from the Butler County Court of Common Pleas, and upon 

the brief filed by appellant's counsel. 

{¶2} Appellant's counsel has filed a brief with this court pursuant to Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), which (1) indicates that a careful review of 

the record from the proceedings below fails to disclose any errors by the trial court 
Butler CA2018-03-049 

 - 2 - 

prejudicial to the rights of appellant upon which an assignment of error may be predicated; 

(2) lists five potential errors "that might arguably support the appeal," Anders, at 744, 87 

S.Ct. at 1400; (3) requests that this court review the record independently to determine 

whether the proceedings are free from prejudicial error and without infringement of 

appellant's constitutional rights; (4) requests permission to withdraw as counsel for 

appellant on the basis that the appeal is wholly frivolous; and (5) certifies that a copy of both 

the brief and motion to withdraw have been served upon appellant. 

{¶3} Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no response having 

been received, we have accordingly examined the record and find no error prejudicial to 

appellant's rights in the proceedings in the trial court. The motion of counsel for appellant 

requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is dismissed for the reason 

that it is wholly frivolous. 

HENDRICKSON, P.J., PIPER and M. POWELL, JJ., concur. 
[Cite as State v. Butler, 2019-Ohio-1045.]
**EXHIBIT 24**
**POWER OF ATTORNEY**
     KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears belowconstitutes and appoints each of Anthony J. Conway and David A. Jonas, withfull power to each to act without the other, his or her true and lawfulattorney-in-fact and agent with full power of substitution, for him or her andin his or her name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign theAnnual Report on Form 10-K of Rochester Medical Corporation (the “Company”) forthe Company’s fiscal year ended September 30, 2003, and any or all amendmentsto said Annual Report, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, andother documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and ExchangeCommission, and to file the same with such other authorities as necessary,granting unto each such attorney-in-fact and agent full power and authority todo and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be donein and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he or shemight or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that each suchattorney-in-fact and agent, or his substitute, may lawfully do or cause to bedone by virtue hereof.
     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Power of Attorney has been signed on this 18thday of November, 2003, by the following persons.   /s/ Anthony J. Conway /s/ Darnell L. Boehm Anthony J. Conway Darnell L. Boehm   /s/ David A. Jonas /s/ Peter R. Conway David A. Jonas Peter R. Conway   /s/ Philip J. Conway /s/ Roger W. Schnobrich Philip J. Conway Roger W. Schnobrich   /s/ Richard D. Fryar /s/ Benson Smith Richard D. Fryar Benson Smith
-54-
# EUR-Lex - 12006E078 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12006E078

**Treaty establishing the European Community (consolidated version) - Part Three - Community policies - TITLE V - Transport - Article 78 **

*
Official Journal C 321 E , 29/12/2006 P. 0073 - 0073 Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0063 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0207 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0028 - Consolidated version (EEC Treaty - no official publication available) *

Article 78

The provisions of this title shall not form an obstacle to the application of measures taken in the Federal Republic of Germany to the extent that such measures are required in order to compensate for the economic disadvantages caused by the division of Germany to the economy of certain areas of the Federal Republic affected by that division.

--------------------------------------------------
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
 
                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
 
To the Stockholders and Board of Directors
Of ITEQ, Inc.:
 
     As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation
of our report dated March 5, 1998 related to the consolidated financial
statements of ITEQ, Inc. and subsidiaries included in this Form 10-K, into
ITEQ's previously filed Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Files No.
333-09051, 33-68516, 33-68518 and 33-68636) and into ITEQ's previously filed
Registration Statement File No. 333-39367 on Form S-3.
 
ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
 
Houston, TX
March 24, 1998
EXHBIT  32.1
------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the  Quarterly Report of Bluetorch, Inc (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission  on  the date hereof (the "Report"), Bruce MacGregor, Chief
Executive  Officer  of  the  Company,  certifies  to  the best of his knowledge,
pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  ss.  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

(2)  The  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  result  of operations of the Company.



/s/  BRUCE  MACGREGOR
-----------------------------
Bruce  MacGregor
Chief  Executive  Officer

May 17, 2004
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74

 36

 38

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

06/01

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 01 Jun 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.44 N 77.04 W Meters AGL

★

■

■

■

■

★

■ ■ ■ ■

★

●

●

●

●

★

● ●

●

●
MUR808200090
MUR808200091
Case 16-28263 Doc 8 Filed 09/08/16 Entered 09/09/16 08:48:44 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
Editorial Note on Part 648
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 648 appear at 62 FR 14651, Mar. 27, 1997.

§ 648.204 Possession restrictions. ( a ) A vessel must be issued and possess a valid limited access herring permit (*i.e.,* Category A, B, or C) or Category E Herring Permit (as defined in § 648.4(a)(10)(iv) and (v)) to fish for, possess, or land more than 6,600 lb (3 mt) of Atlantic herring from any herring management area in the EEZ. A vessel must abide by any harvest restriction specified in § 648.201 that has been implemented. ( 1 ) A vessel issued a Category A Herring Permit may fish for, possess, or land Atlantic herring with no possession restriction from any of the herring management areas defined in § 648.200(f), provided none of the accountability measures or harvest restrictions specified in § 648.201 have been implemented.
( 2 ) A vessel issued only a Category B Herring Permit may fish for, possess, or land Atlantic herring with no possession restriction only from Area 2 or Area 3, as defined in § 648.200(f), provided none of the accountability measures or harvest restrictions specified in § 648.201 have been implemented. Such a vessel may fish in Area 1 only if issued a Category C or D Herring Permit, and only as authorized by the respective permit.
( 3 ) A vessel issued a Category C Herring Permit may fish for, possess, or land up to, but no more than, 55,000 lb (25 mt) of Atlantic herring in any calendar day, and is limited to one landing of herring per calendar day, from any management area defined in § 648.200(f), provided none of the accountability measures or harvest restrictions specified in § 648.201 have been implemented.
( 4 ) A vessel issued a Category D Herring Permit may fish for, possess, or land up to, but no more than, 6,600 lb (3 mt) of Atlantic herring from any herring management area per trip, and is limited to one landing of herring per calendar day, provided none of the accountability measures or harvest restrictions specified in § 648.201 have been implemented.
( 5 ) A vessel issued a Category E Herring Permit may fish for, possess, or land up to, but no more than, 20,000 lb (9 mt) of Atlantic herring from only Area 2 or Area 3, as defined in § 648.200(f), per trip, and is limited to one landing of herring per calendar day, provided none of the accountability measures or harvest restrictions specified in § 648.201 have been implemented.
( 6 ) A vessel issued a herring permit may possess herring roe provided that the carcasses of the herring from which it came are not discarded at sea.
( b ) Each vessel working cooperatively in the herring fishery, including vessels pair trawling, purse seining, and transferring herring at-sea, must be issued a valid herring permit to fish for, possess, or land Atlantic herring and are subject to the most restrictive herring possession limit associated with the permits issued to vessels working cooperatively.
[72 FR 11277, Mar. 12, 2007, as amended at 76 FR 11380, Mar. 2, 2011; 79 FR 8816, Feb. 13, 2014; 79 FR 71972, Dec. 4, 2014; 85 FR 26886, May 6, 2020]
# EUR-Lex - 12002E083 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 12002E083

**Treaty establishing the European Community (Nice consolidated version) - Part Three: Community policies - Title VI: Common rules on competition, taxation and approximation of laws - Chapter 1: Rules on competition - Section 1: Rules applying to undertakings - Article 83 - Article 87 - EC Treaty (Maastricht consolidated version) - Article 87 - EEC Treaty **

*
Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0065 - 0066 Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0209 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0029 - Consolidated version (EEC Treaty - no official publication available) *

Treaty establishing the European Community (Nice consolidated version)

Part Three: Community policies

Title VI: Common rules on competition, taxation and approximation of laws

Chapter 1: Rules on competition

Section 1: Rules applying to undertakings

Article 83

Article 87 - EC Treaty (Maastricht consolidated version)

Article 87 - EEC Treaty

Article 83

1. The appropriate regulations or directives to give effect to the principles set out in Articles 81 and 82 shall be laid down by the Council, acting by a qualified majority on a proposal from the Commission and after consulting the European Parliament.

2. The regulations or directives referred to in paragraph 1 shall be designed in particular:

(a) to ensure compliance with the prohibitions laid down in Article 81(1) and in Article 82 by making provision for fines and periodic penalty payments;

(b) to lay down detailed rules for the application of Article 81(3), taking into account the need to ensure effective supervision on the one hand, and to simplify administration to the greatest possible extent on the other;

(c) to define, if need be, in the various branches of the economy, the scope of the provisions of Articles 81 and 82;

(d) to define the respective functions of the Commission and of the Court of Justice in applying the provisions laid down in this paragraph;

(e) to determine the relationship between national laws and the provisions contained in this section or adopted pursuant to this article.
§ 1150.53 Disqualification of judge. ( a ) A judge shall disqualify himself/herself whenever in his/her opinion it is improper for him/her to preside at the proceedings.
( b ) At any time following appointment of the judge and before the filing of the decision, any party may request the judge to withdraw on grounds of personal bias or prejudice either against it or in favor of any adverse party, by promptly filing with him/her an affidavit setting forth in detail the alleged grounds for disqualification.
( c ) If, in the opinion of the judge, the affidavit referred to in paragraph (b) of this section is filed with due diligence and is sufficient on its face, the judge shall promptly disqualify himself/herself.
( d ) If the judge does not disqualify himself/herself, he/she shall so rule upon the record, stating the grounds for his/her ruling. Then, he/she shall proceed with the hearing, or, if the hearing has closed, he/she shall proceed with the issuance of the decision.
[45 FR 78474, Nov. 25, 1980. Redesignated at 53 FR 39474, Oct. 7, 1988]
§ 218.73 Prohibitions. Notwithstanding incidental takings contemplated in § 218.72(a) and authorized by LOAs issued under §§ 216.106 of this chapter and 218.76, no person in connection with the activities listed in § 218.70(c) may: ( a ) Violate, or fail to comply with, the terms, conditions, and requirements of this subpart or an LOA issued under §§ 216.106 of this chapter and 218.76;
( b ) Take any marine mammal not specified in § 218.72(b);
( c ) Take any marine mammal specified in § 218.72(b) in any manner other than as specified in the LOAs; or
( d ) Take a marine mammal specified in § 218.72(b) if NMFS determines such taking results in more than a negligible impact on the species or stocks of such marine mammal.
Case 16-24302 Doc 4 Filed 07/28/16 Entered 07/28/16 16:14:01 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2
Case 16-24302 Doc 4 Filed 07/28/16 Entered 07/28/16 16:14:01 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2
§ 665.628 Gear identification. ( a ) The vessel number must be affixed to all fish and crab traps on board the vessel or deployed in the water by any vessel or person holding a permit under §§ 665.13 or 665.624 or that is otherwise established to be fishing for PRIA coral reef ecosystem MUS in the PRIA fishery management area.
( b ) *Enforcement action.* ( 1 ) Traps not marked in compliance with paragraph (a) of this section and found deployed in the PRIA fishery management area will be considered unclaimed or abandoned property, and may be disposed of in any manner considered appropriate by NMFS or an authorized officer.
( 2 ) Unattended surround nets or bait seine nets found deployed in the coral reef ecosystem management area will be considered unclaimed or abandoned property, and may be disposed of in any manner considered appropriate by NMFS or an authorized officer.
NUMBER 13-08-00673-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

MANUEL ABELARDO ROJAS, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On appeal from the 370th District Court 

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza, and Vela

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Manuel Abelardo Rojas, attempts to appeal his conviction for indecency

with a child. The trial court has certified that this “is a plea-bargain case, and the

defendant has NO right of appeal.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2).
2

On November 25, 2008, this Court notified appellant’s counsel of the trial court’s

certification and ordered counsel to: (1) review the record; (2) determine whether appellant

has a right to appeal; and (3) forward to this Court, by letter, counsel’s findings as to

whether appellant has a right to appeal, or, alternatively, advise this Court as to the

existence of any amended certification.

On December 15, 2008, counsel filed a letter brief with this Court. Counsel’s

response does not establish that the certification currently on file with this Court is incorrect

or that appellant otherwise has a right to appeal. 

The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that an appeal must be dismissed

if the trial court’s certification does not show that the defendant has the right of appeal.

TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d); see TEX. R. APP. P. 37.1, 44.3, 44.4. Accordingly, this appeal is

DISMISSED. Any pending motions are denied as moot.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Memorandum Opinion delivered and

filed this the 15th day of January, 2009.
# EUR-Lex - 12005SA058 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12005SA058

**Act concerning the conditions of accession of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania and the adjustments to the Treaties on which the European Union is founded - PART FIVE:PROVISIONS RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THIS ACT - TITLE II:APPLICABILITY OF THE ACTS OF THE INSTITUTIONS - Article 58 **

*
Official Journal L 157 , 21/06/2005 P. 0220 - 0220 *

Article 58

The texts of the acts of the institutions, and of the European Central Bank, adopted before accession and drawn up by the Council, the Commission or the European Central Bank in the Bulgarian and Romanian languages shall, from the date of accession, be authentic under the same conditions as the texts drawn up in the present official languages. They shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union if the texts in the present languages were so published.

--------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 32.1

SATELLITE SECURITY CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Satellite
Security Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John L. Phillips, Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|                      |  |  |  |     |  |                      |  |                        
|--------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -------------------- |  | -----------------------
|                      |  |  | 
|Date: August 11, 2006 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ John L. Phillips
|                      |  |  |  |     |  |                      |  | John L. Phillips       
|                      |  |  |  |     |  |                      |  | Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# EUR-Lex - 12004V232 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V232

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART III — THE POLICIES AND FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - TITLE III — INTERNAL POLICIES AND ACTION - CHAPTER III — POLICIES IN OTHER AREAS - Section 4 — Agriculture and fisheries - Article III-232 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0102 - 0102 *

Article III-232

Where in a Member State a product is subject to a national market organisation or to internal rules having equivalent effect which affect the competitive position of similar production in another Member State, a countervailing charge shall be applied by Member States to imports of this product coming from the Member State where such organisation or rules exist, unless that State applies a countervailing charge on export.

The Commission shall adopt European regulations or decisions fixing the amount of these charges at the level required to redress the balance. It may also authorise other measures, the conditions and details of which it shall determine.

--------------------------------------------------