alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EUR-Lex - 12002E305 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 12002E305

**Treaty establishing the European Community (Nice consolidated version) - Part Six: General and Final Provisions - Article 305 - Article 232 - EC Treaty (Maastricht consolidated version) - Article 232 - EEC Treaty **

*
Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0152 - 0152 Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0300 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0078 - Consolidated version (EEC Treaty - no official publication available) *

Treaty establishing the European Community (Nice consolidated version)

Part Six: General and Final Provisions

Article 305

Article 232 - EC Treaty (Maastricht consolidated version)

Article 232 - EEC Treaty

Article 305

1. The provisions of this Treaty shall not affect the provisions of the Treaty establishing the European Coal and Steel Community, in particular as regards the rights and obligations of Member States, the powers of the institutions of that Community and the rules laid down by that Treaty for the functioning of the common market in coal and steel.

2. The provisions of this Treaty shall not derogate from those of the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community.
#### §§ 1154.131-1154.139 [Reserved]
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19
- 6037

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. DARIUS LATRON CHANEY , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Charlotte

. Max O. Cogburn, Jr. , District Judge. ( 3:03

- cr - 00040

- MOC

- 1; 3:16

- cv - 00424

- MOC )

Submitted : April 19, 2023 Decided: June 8, 2023

Before GREGORY , Chief Judge , and NIEMEYER and DIAZ, Circuit Judges

.
Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Joshua B. Carpenter, FEDERAL DEFENDERS OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA, INC., Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellant. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 19-6037 Doc: 28 Filed: 06/08/2023 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Darius Latron Chaney seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. ∗ See Whiteside v. United States , 775 F.3d 180, 182

- 83 (4th Cir. 2014) (en banc) (explaining that § 2255 motions are subject to one

- year statute of limitations, running from latest of four commencement dates enumer ated in 28 U.S.C. § 2255(f)). The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When, as here, the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that the motion states a debatable claim of t he denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler , 565 U.S. 134, 140

- 41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Chaney has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Chaney’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisiona l process.
DISMISSED

∗ We held this case in abeyance for this court’s decision in United States v. Littlejohn , No. 19

- 6089, which presented the same argument related to the dispositive timeliness issue implicated here. See United States v. Littlejohn , No. 19

- 6089, 2023 WL 1859911 (4th Cir. Feb. 9, 2023). Upon the issuance of the mandate in Littlejohn , this appe al was removed from abeyance and is ripe for disposition. USCA4 Appeal: 19-6037 Doc: 28 Filed: 06/08/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
[Crim. No. 525.

First Appellate District.

November 10, 1914.]

#### THE PEOPLE, Respondent, v. AH FONG, Appellant.

Criminal Law—Medical Law—Act of 1913—Constitutionality of— Sufficiency of Title.—The title of the act approved- June 2, 1913, (Stats. 1913, p. 722), for the regulation of the practice of medicine and surgery, etc., indicates with sufficient detail its entire subject matter, and there is not in the body of the statute anything which is in conflict with its title or not included within the scope thereof, and said- act is constitutional.

*725Id.—Prosecution Under Medical Act—Sufficiency of Evidence.—It is held in this prosecution for a violation of said act that the verdict is sustained by the evidence.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order refusing a new trial. William P. Lawlor, Judge.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

William H. Schooler, for Appellant.

U. S. Webb, Attorney-General, and John H. Riordan, Deputy Attorney-General, and Louis H. Ward, for Respondent.

THE COURT.

The record shows that this is an appeal from a judgment of conviction and from an order denying the motion of the defendant for a new trial, in a case wherein the defendant was charged with violating an act for the regulation of the practice of medicine and surgery, etc., approved June 2, 1913 (Stats. 1913, p. 722).

There is no merit in the contention that the statute under which the defendant was prosecuted and convicted is unconstitutional. In our judgment, the title of the act indicates with sufficient detail the entire subject matter of the act; and we are satisfied that there is not in the body of the statute in question anything which is in conflict with its title or not included within the scope thereof.

We are also satisfied, from a reading of the entire evidence in the case, that it is sufficient to sustain the verdict and the judgment.

For these reasons the judgment and order appealed from are affirmed.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

ERIS BERMUDEZ-GOMEZ,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 2D23-1408

September 1, 2023

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for

Pinellas County; William H. Burgess, III, Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

NORTHCUTT, LaROSE, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
§ 9.5 Transition to 911 as the universal emergency telephone number. As of December 11, 2001, except where 911 is already established as the exclusive emergency number to reach a PSAP within a given jurisdiction, telecommunications carriers shall comply with the following transition periods: ( a ) Where a PSAP has been designated, telecommunications carriers shall complete all translation and routing necessary to deliver 911 calls to a PSAP no later than September 11, 2002.
( b ) Where no PSAP has been designated, telecommunications carriers shall complete all translation and routing necessary to deliver 911 calls to the statewide default answering point no later than September 11, 2002.
( c ) Where neither a PSAP nor a statewide default answering point has been designated, telecommunications carriers shall complete the translation and routing necessary to deliver 911 calls to an appropriate local emergency authority, within nine months of a request by the State or locality.
( d ) Where no PSAP nor statewide default answering point has been designated, and no appropriate local emergency authority has been selected by an authorized state or local entity, telecommunications carriers shall identify an appropriate local emergency authority, based on the exercise of reasonable judgment, and complete all translation and routing necessary to deliver 911 calls to such appropriate local emergency authority no later than September 11, 2002.
( e ) Once a PSAP is designated for an area where none had existed as of December 11, 2001, telecommunications carriers shall complete the translation and routing necessary to deliver 911 calls to that PSAP within nine months of that designation.
###### Editorial Note on Part 660

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 660 appear at 67 FR 65906, Oct. 29, 2002, 88 FR 81358, Nov. 22, 2023.

###### Editorial Note on Subpart G of Part 660

#### Editorial Note:

At 88 FR 83859, Dec. 1, 2023, Subpart G was amended by revising all references to “Cordell Banks” to read “Cordell Bank” however, the amendment could not be incorporated because the term did not exist.

#### § 660.353 Recreational fishery—recordkeeping and reporting.

Recordkeeping and reporting requirements at § 660.13 (a) through (c), subpart C, apply to the recreational fishery.
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss.1350)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  ss.1350),
the  undersigned,  George J. Longo,  the Chief Financial  Officer of The Quigley
Corporation,  a Nevada corporation (the "Company"),  does hereby certify, to his
knowledge, that:

The  Annual  Report on Form 10-K for the year  ended  December  31,  2006 of the
Company (the "Report") fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, and the information  contained in
the Report fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial  condition
and results of operations of the Company.

                                                         /s/ George J. Longo
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         George J. Longo
                                                         Chief Financial Officer
                                                         March 12, 2007
```
Exhibit 10.11

                               INDEMNITY AGREEMENT


FOR GOOD AND VALUABLE CONSIDERATION,  including but not limited to the agreement
of Margie Hackett ("Indemnitee") to provide his/her personal guarantee to assist
in financing for the undersigned company,  the undersigned,  Innovative Software
Technologies,  Inc.  ("Company" or "Indemnitor"),  by and under the authority of
its Board of  Directors,  hereby  covenants  and  agrees to  indemnify  and hold
Indemnitee  harmless  from and against any and all claim,  demand,  loss,  cost,
action or liability,  including  attorneys  fees and costs incurred in defending
against any such claim,  demand or action,  arising from,  relating to or in any
way resulting from  obligations  undertaken by Indemnitee as personal  guarantor
for  Indemnitor  and in her role as  corporate  officer  and/or  employee of the
company.

In addition the company will place  1,000,000  shares of its common stock in the
escrow  account of Attorney  Keith Collins to further  indemnify the  guarantor.
This  stock  will be fully  issued  and  outstanding  in the hands of the escrow
agent.  Upon the failure of the  company to satisfy in full its  indemnification
obligation,  the escrow  agent will sell the amount of stock needed to cover the
obligations.

By signing below, the undersigned,  as an officer of Indemnitor,  represents and
warrants that this Indemnity  Agreement has been  authorized and approved by the
Board of Directors of Indemnitor,  by resolution duly and properly adopted,  and
that the  undersigned  has authority to execute this instrument on behalf of the
Company.

DATED this 17 day of August, 2001.



                                    /s/ D. Shane Hackett
                                    By Douglas Shane Hackett
                                    It's President

Attest: /s/ Shawn Thomas
        Secretary - Shawn Thomas



Accepted: /s/ Margie Hackett
          Margie Hackett
Case 16-29527 Doc 3 Filed 09/16/16 Entered 09/16/16 10:39:29 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2
Case 16-29527 Doc 3 Filed 09/16/16 Entered 09/16/16 10:39:29 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2
#### § 1192.177 Ferries, excursion boats and other vessels. [Reserved]
Exhibit 32

                 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350
                       as adopted pursuant to Section 906
                        of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of AngelCiti Entertainment, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, George
Guttierez, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Dean Ward, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.



Date:  August 14, 2003                       By:  /s/  George Guttierez
                                             ----------------------------------
                                             George Gutierrez, CEO and Director

Date:  August 14, 2003                       By:  /s/ Dean Ward
                                             ----------------------------------
                                             Dean Ward, CFO and Director
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5169 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5169

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that the income 
 tax imposed on estates and trusts shall be determined using the rate 
    table applicable to married individuals filing separate returns.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 4, 1994

 Mr. McCrery introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that the income 
 tax imposed on estates and trusts shall be determined using the rate 
    table applicable to married individuals filing separate returns.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INCOME TAX RATE TABLE FOR ESTATES AND TRUSTS.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (e) of section 1 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to tax imposed) is amended by striking 
``the following table:'' and all that follows and inserting ``the table 
which is applicable under subsection (d) (relating to married 
individuals filing separate returns) for the taxable year.''
    (b) Technical Amendments.--
            (1) Paragraph (1) of section 1(f) of such Code is amended 
        by striking ``(d), and (e)'' and inserting ``and (d)''.
            (2) Paragraph (2) of section 1(f) of such Code by striking 
        ``(d), or (e)'' and inserting ``or (d)''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 1994.
                                 <all>
```
§ 38.14 Miscellaneous prohibitions. No person on Midway Atoll National Wildlife Refuge will: ( a ) Smoke or ignite any fire in any designated and posted “No Smoking” area, or in the immediate proximity of any aircraft, fueling pit, or hazardous material storage area;
( b ) Knowingly report or cause to be reported to any public official, or willfully activate or cause to be activated, any alarm, that an emergency exists, knowing that such report or alarm is false. “Emergency.” as used in subpart B of this part, includes any condition which results, or could result, in the response of a public official in an emergency vehicle, or any condition which jeopardizes, or could jeopardize, public lives or safety, or results or could result in the evacuation of an area, building, structure, vehicle, aircraft, or boat or other vessel, or any other place by its occupants; or
( c ) Intentionally report to any public official authorized to issue a warrant of arrest or make an arrest, that a crime has been committed, or make any oral or written statement to any of the above officials concerning a crime or alleged crime or other matter, knowing such report or statement to be false.
DISMISS and Opinion Filed December 17, 2019 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-19-00706-CV
SAMUEL T. RUSSELL, Appellant V. DALLAS INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, Appellee

On Appeal from the 193rd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-19-02493



### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Burns, J ustice Whitehill, and Justice Nowe ll Opinion by Chief Justice Burns

Before the Court is appellant ’s November 13, 2019 motion to wi thdraw his appeal. We
grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1).

190706F.P05 /Robert D. Burns, III/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE–2– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
JUDGMENT

SAMUEL T. RUSSELL, Appellant

No. 05-19-00706-CV V.

DALLAS INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, Appellee On Appeal from the 193rd Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-19-02493. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Burns. Justices Whitehill and N owell participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appe al is DISMISSED

.
It is ORDERED that appellee DALLAS INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT recover its costs of this appeal from appellant SAMUEL T. RUSSELL.

Judgment entered December 17, 2019
#### § 1223.20 What are the requirements for accessing vital records during an emergency?

Agencies must establish retrieval procedures for vital records that are easily implemented, especially since individuals unfamiliar with the records may need to use them in an emergency. For electronic records systems, agencies must also ensure that appropriate hardware, software, and system documentation adequate to operate the system and access the records will be available in case of an emergency.
§ 96.13 Frequency assignments. ( a ) Each PAL shall be authorized to use a 10 megahertz channel in the 3550-3650 MHz band. ( 1 ) No more than seven PALs shall be assigned in any given License Area at any given time.
( 2 ) Multiple channels held by the same Priority Access Licensee in a given License Area shall be assigned consistent with the requirements of § 96.25.
( 3 ) Any frequencies designated for Priority Access that are not in use by a Priority Access Licensee may be utilized by General Authorized Access Users.
( b ) The 3650-3700 MHz band shall be reserved for Grandfathered Wireless Broadband Licensees and GAA Users.
( c ) An SAS shall assign authorized CBSDs to specific frequencies, which may be reassigned by that SAS, consistent with this part.
Case 16-28610 Doc 1 Filed 09/07/16 Entered 09/07/16 12:20:46 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 10
Case 16-28610 Doc 1 Filed 09/07/16 Entered 09/07/16 12:20:46 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 10
Case 16-28610 Doc 1 Filed 09/07/16 Entered 09/07/16 12:20:46 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 10
Case 16-28610 Doc 1 Filed 09/07/16 Entered 09/07/16 12:20:46 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 10
Case 16-28610 Doc 1 Filed 09/07/16 Entered 09/07/16 12:20:46 Desc Main

 Document Page 5 of 10
Case 16-28610 Doc 1 Filed 09/07/16 Entered 09/07/16 12:20:46 Desc Main

 Document Page 6 of 10
Case 16-28610 Doc 1 Filed 09/07/16 Entered 09/07/16 12:20:46 Desc Main

 Document Page 7 of 10
Case 16-28610 Doc 1 Filed 09/07/16 Entered 09/07/16 12:20:46 Desc Main

 Document Page 8 of 10
Case 16-28610 Doc 1 Filed 09/07/16 Entered 09/07/16 12:20:46 Desc Main

 Document Page 9 of 10
Case 16-28610 Doc 1 Filed 09/07/16 Entered 09/07/16 12:20:46 Desc Main

 Document Page 10 of 10
§ 1226.26 How do agencies donate temporary records? ( a ) Agencies must obtain written approval from NARA before donating records eligible for disposal to an appropriate person, organization, institution, corporation, or government (including a foreign government) that has requested them. Records that are not eligible for disposal cannot be donated.
( b ) Agencies request the approval of such a donation by sending a letter to NARA, by mail at National Archives and Records Administration; Office of the Chief Records Officer (AC); 8601 Adelphi Road; College Park, MD 20740-6001, or by email at *RM.Communications@nara.gov .* The request must include: ( 1 ) The name of the department or agency, and relevant subdivisions, having custody of the records;
( 2 ) The name and address of the proposed recipient of the records;
( 3 ) A list containing: ( i ) Description of the records to be transferred,
( ii ) The inclusive dates of the records,
( iii ) The SF 115 or GRS and item numbers that authorize destruction of the records;
( 4 ) A statement providing evidence: ( i ) That the proposed donation is in the best interests of the Government,
( ii ) That the proposed recipient agrees not to sell the records as records or documents, and
( iii ) That the donation will be made without cost to the U.S. Government;
( 5 ) A certification that: ( i ) The records contain no information the disclosure of which is prohibited by law or contrary to the public interest, and/or
( ii ) The records proposed for transfer to a person or commercial business are directly pertinent to the custody or operations of properties acquired from the Government, and/or
( iii ) A foreign government desiring the records has an official interest in them.
( c ) NARA will determine whether the donation is in the public interest and notify the requesting agency of its decision in writing. If NARA determines such a proposed donation is contrary to the public interest, the agency must destroy the records in accordance with the appropriate disposition authority.
[74 FR 51014, Oct. 2, 2009, as amended at 83 FR 13653, Mar. 30, 2018]
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 190 (Monday, October 2, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 58018]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-8415]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE BOARD OF GOVERNORS


Sunshine Act Meeting; Notification of Items Added to Meeting 
Agenda

Date of Meeting: September 11, 2006.

Status:  Closed.

Previous Announcement: 71 FR 52591, September 6, 2006.

Addition: Postal Rate Commission Opinion and Recommended Decision in 
Docket No. MC2006-5, Periodicals Nominal Rate Minor Classification 
Change. At its closed meeting on September 11, 2006, the Board of 
Governors of the United States Postal Service voted unanimously to add 
this item to the agenda of its closed meeting and that no earlier 
announcement was possible. The General Counsel of the United States 
Postal Service certified that in her opinion discussion of these items 
could be properly closed to public observation.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Wendy A. Hocking, Secretary of the 
Board, U.S. Postal Service, 475 L'Enfant Plaza, SW., Washington, DC 
20260-1000.

Wendy A. Hocking,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 06-8415 Filed 9-27-06; 4:13 pm]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-M