alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EUR-Lex - 12004V030 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V030

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART I - TITLE IV — THE UNION'S INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES - CHAPTER II — THE OTHER UNION INSTITUTIONS AND ADVISORY BODIES - Article I-30 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0025 - 0025 *

Article I-30

The European Central Bank

1. The European Central Bank, together with the national central banks, shall constitute the European System of Central Banks. The European Central Bank, together with the national central banks of the Member States whose currency is the euro, which constitute the Eurosystem, shall conduct the monetary policy of the Union.

2. The European System of Central Banks shall be governed by the decision-making bodies of the European Central Bank. The primary objective of the European System of Central Banks shall be to maintain price stability. Without prejudice to that objective, it shall support the general economic policies in the Union in order to contribute to the achievement of the latter's objectives. It shall conduct other Central Bank tasks in accordance with Part III and the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank.

3. The European Central Bank is an institution. It shall have legal personality. It alone may authorise the issue of the euro. It shall be independent in the exercise of its powers and in the management of its finances. Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies and the governments of the Member States shall respect that independence.

4. The European Central Bank shall adopt such measures as are necessary to carry out its tasks in accordance with Articles III-185 to III-191 and Article III-196, and with the conditions laid down in the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank. In accordance with these same Articles, those Member States whose currency is not the euro, and their central banks, shall retain their powers in monetary matters.

5. Within the areas falling within its responsibilities, the European Central Bank shall be consulted on all proposed Union acts, and all proposals for regulation at national level, and may give an opinion.

6. The decision-making organs of the European Central Bank, their composition and operating methods are set out in Articles III-382 and III-383, as well as in the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank.

--------------------------------------------------
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-88,593-02

EX PARTE CHRISTOPHER CALVIN, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS

CAUSE NO. 17CR-125 IN THE 349TH DISTRICT COURT FROM HOUSTON COUNTY

Per curiam.

OPINION

On Oct. 30, 2019, this Court ordered Respondent, the District Clerk of Houston County, to

state whether Christopher Calvin had filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus on August 19,

2019, in cause number 17CR0125. On May 18, 2023, this Court received a response from the

District Clerk in which she stated that she had received an Article 11.07 application from Applicant

in 2019 but she returned it to him, along with a blank Article 11.07 form. We conditionally grant

relief.

A district clerk has a ministerial duty under Art. 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal

Procedure to receive, file, and timely forward to this Court applications for writs of habeas corpus.

Benson v. Dist. Clerk, Montgomery Cty., 331 S.W.3d 431, 432 (Tex. Crim. App. 2011). 
We conditionally grant Relator's application for a writ of mandamus and direct the Houston

County District Clerk to accept and file Relator's habeas application and to forward it to this Court

under Article 11.07.

Following custom, we will withhold issuance of the writ and allow the District Clerk an

opportunity to conform her actions to this opinion. Only if she refuses to file Relator's habeas

application will the writ of mandamus issue. State ex rel. Hill v. Pirtle, 887 S.W.2d 921, 932 (Tex.

Crim. App. 1994).

Relator shall file any supplemental information or habeas applications within 30 days of the

issuance of this opinion.

Delivered: June 21, 2023

Do not publish
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**
MEMORANDUM OPINION
N o. 04

- 16

- 00683

- CR
Daniel GUTIERREZ
- LOPEZ , Appellant

v. The STATE of Texas , Appellee
From the 186th Judicial District Court , Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2013CR7741 Honorable Jefferson Moore , Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice Karen Angelini, Justice Jason Pulliam, Justice
Delivered and Filed: November 23, 2016
DISMISSED
On October 31 , 2016, this c ourt issued an order s tating this appeal would be dismissed pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(d) unless appellant filed in the appellate record within twenty days an amended trial court certification that shows appellant has the right of appeal.
See T EX

. R. A P P

. P. 25.2(d), 37.1; see also Daniels v. State , 110 S.W.3d 174, 175

- 76 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 2003, order). Appellant did not file an amended certification, and the clerk’s record does not contain a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal. To the contrary,04

- 16

- 00683

- CR

- 2

- the trial court certification in the record states “this criminal case is a plea

- bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” The clerk’s record contains a written plea bargain, and the punishment assessed did not

ex ceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by appellant. Therefore, the clerk’s record supports the trial court’s certification that appellant has no right of appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 25.2(a)(2). Accordingly, we dismiss the appea l. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(d).
PER CURIAM
DO NOT PUBLISH
EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of WNC Housing Tax
Credit VI, L.P., Series 8 (the "Partnership") for the period ended June 30, 2003
as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the
"Report"),  and  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.,  section  1350,  as adopted  pursuant to
section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  I,  Wilfred N.  Cooper,  Jr.,
President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc., general partner
of the Partnership, hereby certify that to my knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Partnership.




/s/WILFRED N. COOPER, JR.
-------------------------
Wilfred N. Cooper, Jr.
President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.
August 14, 2003
Editorial Note on Part 622
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 622 appear at 79 FR 57837, Sept. 26, 2014 and at 81 FR 32253, May 23, 2016.

§ 622.201 South Atlantic rock shrimp limited access. ( a ) *Commercial Vessel Permits for Rock Shrimp (South Atlantic EEZ).* For a person aboard a vessel to fish for rock shrimp in the South Atlantic EEZ off Georgia or off Florida or possess rock shrimp in or from the South Atlantic EEZ off those states, a Commercial Permit for Rock Shrimp (South Atlantic EEZ) must be issued to the vessel and must be on board. No applications for additional Commercial Vessel Permits for Rock Shrimp (South Atlantic EEZ) will be accepted.
( b ) *Transfer of an existing permit.* A Commercial Vessel Permit for Rock Shrimp (South Atlantic EEZ) is valid only for the vessel and owner named on the permit. To change either the vessel or the owner, a complete application for transfer must be submitted to the RA. An owner of a vessel with a permit may request that the RA transfer a valid permit to another vessel owned by the same entity, to the same vessel owned by another entity, or to another vessel with another owner. A transfer of a permit under this paragraph will include the transfer of the vessel's entire catch history of South Atlantic rock shrimp to a new owner; no partial transfers are allowed.
( c ) *Renewal.* The RA will not reissue a Commercial Vessel Permit for Rock Shrimp (South Atlantic EEZ) if the permit is revoked or if the RA does not receive an application for renewal of the permit within 1 year after the expiration date of the permit.
( d ) *Limitation on permits.* A vessel for which a permit for South Atlantic rock shrimp is required may be issued either a Commercial Vessel Permit for Rock Shrimp (Carolinas Zone) or a Commercial Vessel Permit for Rock Shrimp (South Atlantic EEZ), depending on its eligibility. However, no such vessel may be issued both permits for the same period of effectiveness.
# EUR-Lex - 12004V015 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V015

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART I - TITLE III — UNION COMPETENCES - Article I-15 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0017 - 0017 *

Article I-15

The coordination of economic and employment policies

1. The Member States shall coordinate their economic policies within the Union. To this end, the Council of Ministers shall adopt measures, in particular broad guidelines for these policies.

Specific provisions shall apply to those Member States whose currency is the euro.

2. The Union shall take measures to ensure coordination of the employment policies of the Member States, in particular by defining guidelines for these policies.

3. The Union may take initiatives to ensure coordination of Member States' social policies.

--------------------------------------------------
Joseph Edgar

Jennette Heatherly

Hawkeye Technologies

1450 Kingswood Dr Apt 402

Roseville, CA 95678

Specific Sections in which Hawkeye Technologies is seeking an exemption:

IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION FOR EXEMPTION OF: HAWKEYE TECHNOLOGIES

FOR AN EXEMPTION SEEKING RELIEF FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF

TITLE 14 OF THE CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS SECTIONS 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b),

91.405(a), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b) CONCERNING COMMERCIAL OPERATION OF DJI FLAMEWHEEL F450

+ DJI INSPIRE 1 UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS PURSUANT TO SECTION 333 OF THE FAA MONDERNIZATION AND

REFORM ACT OF 2012 (PUBLIC LAW 112-95)

Extent of relief and our reason for seeking relief:

In order to use our Unmanned Aircraft Systems for commercial use. We are seeking this exemption in order to legally conduct business and

comply with all Federal regulations and standards put forth by the FAA while operating our Unmanned Aircraft Systems.

How our request would benefit the public as a whole:

Granting the petition for Hawkeye Technologies would allow for us to be able to efficiently, legally, economically, and safely perform

aerial video and photography of special events, sporting events, land survaillance, real estate, commercial inspections, and commercial maintenance over

certain areas of these United States. Using Unmanned Aircraft Systems such as drone technology would greatly reduce negative impacts

on the environment and also provide a safer alternative for businesses to conduct land and equipment inspections.

Reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety, or how the exemption would provide a level of safety at least

equal to the existing rule:

By adhering to guildlines set forth by the FAA we would not be going above the recommended altitude nor flying at night therefore avoiding any hazerdous

accidents such as colliding with a manned aircraft. We will be giving notification to the FAA 72 hours prior to any commercial use. Also we will be regularly

test flying and doing daily maintenance logs to ensure the quads are in proper working order for each job or event as to prevent damage or bodily injury.

Summary to publish in the Federal Register stating --

1. SEEKING RELIEF FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF

TITLE 14 OF THE CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS SECTIONS 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b),

91.405(a), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b) CONCERNING COMMERCIAL OPERATION OF DJI FLAMEWHEEL F450

+ DJI INSPIRE 1 UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS PURSUANT TO SECTION 333 OF THE FAA MONDERNIZATION AND

REFORM ACT OF 2012 (PUBLIC LAW 112-95)

2. We are seeking exemption in order to use our UAS for commercial use.

Submitted on March 29 2015 by:

Joseph Edgar

Jennette Heatherly

Hawkeye Technologies

1450 Kingswood Dr

Roseville, CA 95678

JoeEdgar@hawkeye-technologies.com

Jennette@hawkeye-technologies.com
# EUR-Lex - 12006E203 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12006E203

**Treaty establishing the European Community (consolidated version) - Part Five - Institutions of the Community - TITLE I - Provisions governing the institutions - Chapter 1 - The institutions - Section 2 - The Council - Article 203 **

*
Official Journal C 321 E , 29/12/2006 P. 0136 - 0136 Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0117 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0264 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0057 - Consolidated version (EEC Treaty - no official publication available) *

Article 203

The Council shall consist of a representative of each Member State at ministerial level, authorised to commit the government of that Member State.

The office of President shall be held in turn by each Member State in the Council for a term of six months in the order decided by the Council acting unanimously.

--------------------------------------------------
# EUR-Lex - 12002E169 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 12002E169

**Treaty establishing the European Community (Nice consolidated version) - Part Three: Community policies - Title XVIII: Research and technological development - Article 169 - Article 130l - EC Treaty (Maastricht consolidated version) - **

*
Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0107 - 0107 Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0253 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0051 - Consolidated version *

Treaty establishing the European Community (Nice consolidated version)

Part Three: Community policies

Title XVIII: Research and technological development

Article 169

Article 130l - EC Treaty (Maastricht consolidated version)

Article 169

In implementing the multiannual framework programme, the Community may make provision, in agreement with the Member States concerned, for participation in research and development programmes undertaken by several Member States, including participation in the structures created for the execution of those programmes.
MEMORANDUM

Subject: Summary of Stakeholder Meeting

From: Martha Keating

To: Docket EPA

- HQ

- OAR

- 2008

- 0699

Date: May 5, 2015

On April 23 , 2015, representatives from EPA’s Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

attended a meeting with representatives of several health and environmental advocacy groups.

Related to the ozone NAAQS, attendees discussed the timing of the final ozone National

Ambient Air Quality Standards

. There were no meeting materials.

The followi ng is a list of attendees

.

Name Company

David Baron Earthjustice

Paul Cort Earthjustice

John Walke Environmental Defense Fund

Emily Davis Environmental Defense Fund

Peter Zalzal Environmental Defense Fund

Janice Nolan American Lung Association

Zachary Fabish Sierra Club

Steve Page EPA

- OAQPS

Anna Wood EPA

– OAQPS

- AQPD

Chet Wayland EPA

– OAQPS

- AQAD

Peter Tsirigotis EPA

– OAQPS

- SPPD
Case 16-30263 Doc 1 Filed 09/22/16 Entered 09/22/16 15:51:57 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 10
Case 16-30263 Doc 1 Filed 09/22/16 Entered 09/22/16 15:51:57 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 10
Case 16-30263 Doc 1 Filed 09/22/16 Entered 09/22/16 15:51:57 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 10
Case 16-30263 Doc 1 Filed 09/22/16 Entered 09/22/16 15:51:57 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 10
Case 16-30263 Doc 1 Filed 09/22/16 Entered 09/22/16 15:51:57 Desc Main

 Document Page 5 of 10
Case 16-30263 Doc 1 Filed 09/22/16 Entered 09/22/16 15:51:57 Desc Main

 Document Page 6 of 10
Case 16-30263 Doc 1 Filed 09/22/16 Entered 09/22/16 15:51:57 Desc Main

 Document Page 7 of 10
Case 16-30263 Doc 1 Filed 09/22/16 Entered 09/22/16 15:51:57 Desc Main

 Document Page 8 of 10
Case 16-30263 Doc 1 Filed 09/22/16 Entered 09/22/16 15:51:57 Desc Main

 Document Page 9 of 10
Case 16-30263 Doc 1 Filed 09/22/16 Entered 09/22/16 15:51:57 Desc Main

 Document Page 10 of 10
#### § 1233.2 What definitions apply to this part?

See § 1220.18 of this subchapter for definitions of terms used throughout Subchapter B, including part 1233.
In the Matter of 

Kind for Congress Committee ) 

and Nfary JoAuu Weruer 1 

as treasurer 1 

STATEMENT FOR THE KECORD . _, 

I wish to clarify my reasons for joining the statement of reasons in this matter. 

There is no dispute that the Committee included the proper disclaimer when it first put up 

the sign at issue. Later the disclaimer was covered by graffiti, then removed in the course 

of cleaning the graffiti. I do not believe that strict liability can be imposed on a campaign 

where a third party defaces or removes a disclaimer: Thus, if pre-probable cause 

conciliation were not successful, in order for the Commission to find Probable Cause, the 

investigation would need to show that the campaign had control of the sign and knew, or 

should have knob; of the problem, and failed to take prompt action to correct the 

problem. If this were shown, the Commission would then have to involve itself in an 

arcane judgment as to the promptness with which the campaign would be required to 

replace the disclaimer. 

I have joined the Statement of Reasons in light of the above analysis, the likely amount of 

discovery and the difficult evidentiary burden that would result from pursuing the case, 

the small amount at stake, and the fact that this is unlikely to be a recurrent problem. I 

agree that prosecutorial discretion to close the file is appropriate. A 

Brad .ley A'. Shh' Dafe 

commissioner
# ORIGINAL

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 21-0477
STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiffand Appellee,
v. LAURA LEE HALE,

Defendant and Appellant. 

## OCT 2 5 2022 Bowen Greenwood Clerk of Supreme Court State of Montana ORDER

Appellant Laura Lee Hale appeals from the Order Revoking Defendant's Sentence and Amended Judgment and Commitment of the First Judicial District Court, Lewis and Clark County, in its CaseNo. CDC 2017-505. Hale arguestheDistrict Court erredby failing to give her credit for time served in custody from March 19, 2021, to April 9, 2021. The parties have filed a Stipulation, Motion to Dismiss Appeal with Prejudice, and Proposed Order for Remand requestingthatthismatter beremanded to theDistrict Court for thepurpose ofentering an amended sentence andjudgment. Without agreeingwith all ofthe arguments Hale has raised, the State agrees that in this casetheDistrict Court erred in failing to give Hale credit for time served in custody from March 19, 2021, to April 9, 2021. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is REMANDED to the First Judicial District Court, Lewis and Clark County, with itistructions for the District Courtto amend its Judgment and Commitment to give Hale credit for time served in custody from March 19, 2021, to April 9, 2021. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk is directed to provide copies ofthis Order to all counsel ofrecord and to presidingjudge Honorable Kathy Seeley. 10/25/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0477_~



### Dated thisZ-6 day of October, 2022.

ChiefJustice

2
Argued and submitted June 30, 1993,

affirmed May 4,

petition for review allowed August 9,1994 (319 Or 572)

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Appellant, v.*LUCILO ROMERO BARAJAS, *Respondent.*

(920534889; CA A75949)

873 P2d 344

Timothy A. Sylwester, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Charles S. Crookham, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.

Peter Gartlan, Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Sally L. Avera, Public Defender.

James A. Palmer filed a brief *amicus curiae*for Sexual Abuse Victims’ Advocates.

Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Riggs and Edmonds, Judges.

PER CURIAM

Affirmed. *State v. Cookman,*127 Or App 283, 873 P2d 335 (1994).
Your session is about to expire.Resume session

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Welcome.Log inorregisterCOPS OFFICE RESOURCE CENTER

HomeCatalogCartOrders

                    

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                CatalogMatches: 1Offline form Recent Popular Online Print OtherCOPS-W0763Exploitation of Trafficked Women POP GuideThis guide describes the problem of exploiting women who have been trafficked into the United States and the aspects of human trafficking that contribute to it. Additionally, the guide focuses on the final period in the process of trafficking at which women are further exploited by those into whose hands they are passed. The guide identifies a series of questions that can help law enforcement analyze their local problems related to trafficking of women. Finally, it reviews responses to the exploitation of trafficked women and examines what is known about the effectiveness of these responses from research and police practice.By Graeme R. NewmanCategories: New Immigrant Communities • POP Center Resource • Violent CrimeLanguage: EnglishPublic linkhttps://portal.cops.usdoj.gov/resourcecenter?item=cops-w0763Click here to see the entire catalog.Cart:Download PDFWeb • Mar 2006Search catalogreset title abstract authors contentContaining text: exact phraseNot containing text: exact phraseLanguage:anyEnglishSpanishHmongVietnameseCategory:anyAlternatives to IncarcerationCommunity PartnershipsData and AnalysisEthics and IntegrityFoundations of Community PolicingHiring, Recruitment, and RetentionHomeland SecurityNew Immigrant CommunitiesNonviolent CrimeOtherPolice OperationsPOP Center ResourceSchool and Campus SafetyTechnologyTribalViolent CrimeYouth SafetyPublished after:Published before:Page1

                    

FOIA | No FEAR Act | Open Government | Privacy | Legal|HelpCopyright (C) U.S. Department of Justice, COPS Office, IT Division, 2012 - 2024. All rights reserved.
Rendered on Mon Mar 4 2024 at 05:12 (UTC-5) in 0.91 secEnterprise Framework 3.21.7.7 • Store Controls 3.3.1.7Survey 500303407 Section 60000560 Rules Hints Inactive
# EUR-Lex - 12007P016 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12007P016

**Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - TITLE II - FREEDOMS - Article 16 - Freedom to conduct a business **

*
Official Journal 303 , 14/12/2007 P. 0006 - 0006 *

Article 16

Freedom to conduct a business

The freedom to conduct a business in accordance with Union law and national laws and practices is recognised.

--------------------------------------------------