alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, D.C.

Sound Aircraft Services, Inc. COMPLAINANT


### v. Town of East Hampton and East Hampton Airport RESPONDENT Docket No. 16

- 14-07

NOTICE OF EXTENSION OF TIME

This matter is before the Federa l Aviation Administration (FAA) based on the above-referenced complaint, filed in accordance with FAA Rules of Practice for Federally-AssistedAirport Enforcement Proceedings, 14 CFR Part 16 (Rules ofPract ice). Pursuant to the Rules ofPractice, § 16.l l (a), the date by which the Director, FAA Office ofAirport Compliance and Management Analysis will issue a Director's Determination in this matter is hereby extended to on or before March 27, 2017.

Ke in C. Willis D. ector, Office ofAirport Compliance and Management Analysis Date

### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE i{L-- 1 HEREBY CERTIFY that on January 

# JJ:_, 2017, I placed in the United States mail (first class, postage paid) , a true copy oft he Notice ofExtension ofTime addressed to : Counsel to the Complainant 

### Paul A. Lange, Esq. Alison 

### L. Squiccimarro , Es q. Law Offices of Paul A. 

### Lange, LLC 80 

### Ferry Boulevard Stratford, CT 06615 pal@lopal.com als@lopal.com Counsel to the Respondent 

### Michael Sendlenski Town Attorney Town ofEast Hampton 159 Pantigo Road East Hampton, NY 1193 7 msendlenski@ehamptonny .gov Jim Brundige Interim Airport Manager Town ofEast Hampton Airport 200 Daniels Hole Road Wainscott, NY 11937 jbrundige@ehamptonny.gov
Copy to: FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket Office of Airport Compliance and Management Analysis, AC0-1 00



### laudia Roberts Office ofAirport Compliance and Management Analysis
#### § 501.9 Fees.

A fee of $0.10 shall be charged for each copy of each page of a record made, by photocopy or similar process, at the request of an individual. No fee shall be charged for copies made at the initiative of the Commission incident to granting access to a record. A total copying fee of $2.00 or less may be waived by the Privacy Officer, but fees for all requests made contemporaneously by an individual shall be aggregated to determine the total fee.

[41 FR 5, Jan. 2, 1976]
#### § 665.210 [Reserved]
# EUR-Lex - 12004V029 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V029

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART I - TITLE IV — THE UNION'S INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES - CHAPTER I — THE INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK - Article I-29 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0024 - 0024 *

Article I-29

The Court of Justice of the European Union

1. The Court of Justice of the European Union shall include the Court of Justice, the General Court and specialised courts. It shall ensure that in the interpretation and application of the Constitution the law is observed.

Member States shall provide remedies sufficient to ensure effective legal protection in the fields covered by Union law.

2. The Court of Justice shall consist of one judge from each Member State. It shall be assisted by Advocates-General.

The General Court shall include at least one judge per Member State.

The Judges and the Advocates-General of the Court of Justice and the Judges of the General Court shall be chosen from persons whose independence is beyond doubt and who satisfy the conditions set out in Articles III-355 and III-356. They shall be appointed by common accord of the governments of the Member States for six years. Retiring Judges and Advocates-General may be reappointed.

3. The Court of Justice of the European Union shall in accordance with Part III:

(a) rule on actions brought by a Member State, an institution or a natural or legal person;

(b) give preliminary rulings, at the request of courts or tribunals of the Member States, on the interpretation of Union law or the validity of acts adopted by the institutions;

(c) rule in other cases provided for in the Constitution.

--------------------------------------------------
# EUR-Lex - 12004V/AFI/DCL/19 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V/AFI/DCL/19

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - FINAL ACT - A.Declarations concerning provisions of the Constitution - 19.Declaration on Article III-220 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0461 - 0461 *

19. Declaration on Article III-220

The Conference considers that the reference in Article III-220 to island regions can include island States in their entirety, subject to the necessary criteria being met.

--------------------------------------------------
# EUR-Lex - 11972BN01/3/H/1 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11972BN01/3/H/1

**DOCUMENTS CONCERNING THE ACCESSION TO THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES OF THE KINGDOM OF DENMARK, IRELAND, THE KINGDOM OF NORWAY AND THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND, ACT CONCERNING THE CONDITIONS OF ACCESSION AND THE ADJUSTMENTS TO THE TREATIES, 2. ANNEXES, ANNEX I LIST REFERRED TO IN ARTICLE 29 OF THE ACT OF ACCESSION, III. RIGHT OF ESTABLISHMENT, FREEDOM TO PROVIDE SERVICES, COORDINATION OF PROCEDURES IN THE FIELD OF PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACTS AND APPROXIMATION OF LEGISLATION, H. COMPANY LAW **

*
Official Journal L 073 , 27/03/1972 P. 0089 *

++++

1 . COUNCIL DIRECTIVE NO 68/151/EEC OF 9 MARCH 1968

OJ NO L 65/8 , 14 MARCH 1968

THE FOLLOWING IS INSERTED AT THE END OF ARTICLE 1 :

" IN THE UNITED KINGDOM :

_ COMPANIES INCORPORATED WITH LIMITED LIABILITY ;

IN IRELAND :

_ COMPANIES INCORPORATED WITH LIMITED LIABILITY ;

IN DENMARK :

_ AKTIESELSKAB ; KOMMANDIT-AKTIESELSKAB ;

IN NORWAY :

_ AKSJESELSKAP ; KOMMANDITTAKSJESELSKAP . "

ARTICLE 2 ( 1 ) ( F ) IS REPLACED BY THE FOLLOWING :

" ( F ) THE BALANCE SHEET AND THE PROFIT AND LOSS ACCOUNT FOR EACH FINANCIAL YEAR . THE DOCUMENT CONTAINING THE BALANCE SHEET MUST GIVE DETAILS OF THE PERSONS WHO ARE REQUIRED BY LAW TO CERTIFY IT . HOWEVER , IN RESPECT OF THE GESELLSCHAFT MIT BESCHRAENKTER HAFTUNG , SOCIETE DE PERSONNES A RESPONSABILITE LIMITEE , PERSONENVENNOOTSCHAP MET BEPERKTE AANSPRAKELIJKHEID , SOCIETE A RESPONSABILITE LIMITEE AND SOCIETA A RESPONSABILITA LIMITATA UNDER GERMAN , BELGIAN , FRENCH , ITALIAN OR LUXEMBOURG LAW REFERRED TO IN ARTICLE 1 , THE BESLOTEN NAAMLOZE VENNOOTSCHAP UNDER NETHERLANDS LAW , THE PRIVATE COMPANY UNDER THE LAW OF IRELAND AND THE PRIVATE COMPANY UNDER THE LAW OF NORTHERN IRELAND , THE COMPULSORY APPLICATION OF THIS PROVISION SHALL BE POSTPONED UNTIL THE DATE OF IMPLEMENTATION OF A DIRECTIVE CONCERNING COORDINATION OF THE CONTENTS OF BALANCE SHEETS AND OF PROFIT AND LOSS ACCOUNTS AND CONCERNING EXEMPTION OF SUCH OF THOSE COMPANIES WHOSE BALANCE SHEET TOTAL IS LESS THAN THAT SPECIFIED IN THE DIRECTIVE FROM THE OBLIGATION TO MAKE DISCLOSURE IN FULL OR IN PART OF THE SAID DOCUMENTS . THE COUNCIL WILL ADOPT SUCH A DIRECTIVE WITHIN TWO YEARS FOLLOWING ADOPTION OF THE PRESENT DIRECTIVE . "
EXHIBIT 31.1
                                 CERTIFICATIONS

         I, RS Schmitt, certify that:

         1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Cactus New
Media I, Inc;

         2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

         3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

         4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

                  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
         caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
         supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
         registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
         us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
         which this report is being prepared;

                  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
         controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
         about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as
         of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
         evaluation; and

                  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
         internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
         registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal
         quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected,
         or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
         control over financial reporting; and

         5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditor and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

                  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
         the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
         which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's
         ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
         and

                  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
         management or other employees who have a significant role in the
         registrant's internal control over financial reporting.


Date: August 11, 2003

/s/RS Schmitt
-----------------------
RS Schmitt
Chief Executive Officer
§ 665.428 Gear identification. ( a ) The vessel number must be affixed to all fish and crab traps on board the vessel or deployed in the water by any vessel or person holding a permit under §§ 665.13 or 665.424 or that is otherwise established to be fishing for Mariana coral reef ecosystem MUS in the management area.
( b ) *Enforcement action.* ( 1 ) Traps not marked in compliance with paragraph (a) of this section and found deployed in the coral reef ecosystem management area will be considered unclaimed or abandoned property, and may be disposed of in any manner considered appropriate by NMFS or an authorized officer.
( 2 ) Unattended surround nets or bait seine nets found deployed in the coral reef ecosystem management area will be considered unclaimed or abandoned property, and may be disposed of in any manner considered appropriate by NMFS or an authorized officer.
Document

Exhibit 10.1
AMENDMENT NUMBER THREE
TO THE
L3HARRIS RETIREMENT SAVINGS PLAN


WHEREAS, L3Harris Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“L3Harris”), heretofore has adopted and maintains the L3Harris Retirement Savings Plan, as amended and restated effective January 1, 2020 (the "Plan");


WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 17.1 of the Plan, the Employee Benefits Committee (the “Committee”) of L3Harris has the authority to amend the Plan;


WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 13.3 of the Plan, the Committee has delegated certain of such amendment authority to the head of global benefits of L3Harris (currently, the Senior Director, Global Benefits) (the “Head of Global Benefits”);


WHEREAS, L3Harris has entered into a Sale Agreement with Leidos, Inc. (“Purchaser”) dated as of February 3, 2020 pursuant to which L3Harris is selling to Purchaser a certain portion of L3Harris’ Security and Automation business, including the sale of L3Harris’ subsidiary, L3 Security and Detection Systems, Inc. (such agreement, as it may be amended from time to time, the “Sale Agreement”);


WHEREAS, as a result of such sale all “Continuing U.S. Employees” (for all purposes of this Amendment, as such term is defined in the Sale Agreement) will cease to be employed by an entity participating in the Plan;


WHEREAS, the Sale Agreement provides that effective as of the “Closing Date” (for all purposes of this Amendment, as such term is defined in the Sale Agreement), each Continuing U.S. Employee shall become fully vested in his or her account balance in the Plan; and


WHEREAS, the Head of Global Benefits desires to amend the Plan to reflect the above-described term of the Sale Agreement.


NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that Schedule B of the Plan, Special Rules Applying to Divestiture Accounts and Divestiture Participants, is hereby amended, contingent upon the occurrence of the “Closing” (as such term is defined in the Sale Agreement) and effective as of the Closing Date, to add a new paragraph at the end thereof as follows:


7. Divestiture of the Security and Automation Business


(a)  In General.  The Company has entered into a Sale Agreement with Leidos, Inc. dated as of February 3, 2020 pursuant to which the Company will sell to Leidos, Inc. a certain portion of the Company’s Security and Automation business, including the sale of the Company’s subsidiary, L3 Security and Detection Systems, Inc. (such agreement, as it may be amended from time to time, the “SDS Sale Agreement”).  










(b)  Vesting.  Notwithstanding any other provision in the Plan, effective as of the “Closing Date” (as such term is defined in the SDS Sale Agreement), the “Continuing U.S. Employees” (as such term is defined in the SDS Sale Agreement) shall be 100% vested in their Accounts under the Plan.
APPROVED by the HEAD OF GLOBAL BENEFITS on this 1st  day of May, 2020.


              /s/ Allison Oncel  
Allison Oncel
Senior Director, Global Benefits
#### § 1001.8 Information collection.

The information collection requirements contained in 36 CFR 1001.5, 1002.5, 1002.10, 1002.12, 1002.17, 1002.33, 1002.38, 1002.50, 1002.51, 1002.52, 1002.60, 1002.61, 1002.62, 1004.4 and 1004.11 have been approved by the Office of Management and Budget under 44 U.S.C. 3501 *et seq.,* and assigned clearance number 1024-0026. This information is being collected to provide the Executive Director data necessary to issue permits for special uses of the area administered by the Presidio Trust and to obtain notification of accidents that occur within the area administered by the Presidio Trust. This information will be used to grant administrative benefits and to facilitate prompt emergency response to accidents. In 36 CFR 1002.33 and 1004.4, the obligation to respond is mandatory; in all other sections the obligation to respond is required in order to obtain a benefit.
#### § 1010.2 Purpose.

The regulations in this part incorporate and supplement the Council on Environmental Quality's (CEQ) regulations at 40 CFR parts 1500 through 1508 for implementing the procedural provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended (NEPA), and otherwise to describe how the Trust intends to consider environmental factors and concerns in the Trust's decision-making process within the requirements set forth in NEPA and CEQ regulations.
DATE: December 7, 2021

 

 The following cases in which the Court of Appeals issued published opinions have been 

appealed to the Supreme Court:

 

1. Caine Calif Davis

 v. Commonwealth of Virginia 

 Record No. 1134-20-4

 Opinion rendered by Judge Humphreys on

 September 28, 2021

2. William Joseph Morgan

 v. Commonwealth of Virginia

 Record No. 1139-20-1

 Opinion rendered by Judge Huff on

 October 5, 2021

3. Alonzo Devon White

 v. Commonwealth of Virginia

 Record No. 0994-20-4

 Opinion rendered by Judge Russell on

 October 12, 2021
 The following cases in which the Court of Appeals issued published opinions have been 

disposed of by the Supreme Court:

1. Shaka Markel Long 

 v. Commonwealth of Virginia 

 Record No. 1971-19-1

 Opinion rendered by Judge Beales 

 on January 26, 2021

 Refused (210205)

2. Clyde Carleton Koons, IV, f/k/a Clyde Carleton Crane, IV

v. Leslie Elizabeth Crane

 Record No. 0580-20-4

Opinion rendered by Judge O’Brien 

 on February 2, 2021

 Dismissed pursuant to Code § 17.1-410(A)(3) and (B) (210238)

3. Jason L. Brooks

 v. Commonwealth of Virginia

 Record No. 0209-21-4

 Opinion rendered by Judge Humphreys 

 on April 13, 2021 

 Refused (210457)
§ 217.96 Letters of Authorization. ( a ) To incidentally take marine mammals pursuant to these regulations, the Navy must apply for and obtain LOAs in accordance with § 216.106 of this chapter for conducting the activity identified in § 217.90(c).
( b ) LOAs, unless suspended or revoked, may be effective for a period of time not to extend beyond the expiration date of these regulations.
( c ) If an LOAs expires prior to the expiration date of these regulations, the Navy may apply for and obtain a renewal of the LOAs.
( d ) In the event of projected changes to the activity or to mitigation, monitoring, reporting (excluding changes made pursuant to the adaptive management provision of § 217.97(c)(1)) required by an LOA, the Navy must apply for and obtain a modification of LOAs as described in § 217.97.
( e ) Each LOA shall set forth: ( 1 ) Permissible methods of incidental taking;
( 2 ) Means of effecting the least practicable adverse impact (*i.e.,* mitigation) on the species, their habitat, and the availability of the species for subsistence uses; and
( 3 ) Requirements for monitoring and reporting.
( f ) Issuance of the LOAs shall be based on a determination that the level of taking shall be consistent with the findings made for the total taking allowable under these regulations.
( g ) Notice of issuance or denial of the LOAs shall be published in the Federal Register within 30 days of a determination.
§ 1120.38 Time allowed for action on appeals. ( a ) Except as otherwise provided in this section, as soon as possible and not later than the twentieth working day after the day on which the Freedom of Information Officer receives an appeal from an initial denial of a request for records, the General Counsel shall issue a written determination stating which of the requested records (as to which appeal was made) will and which will not be disclosed.
( b ) The period of 20 working days shall be measured from the date an appeal is first received by the Freedom of Information Officer.
( c ) The General Counsel may extend the basic 20-day period established under paragraph (a) of this section by a period not to exceed 10 additional working days if— ( 1 ) He or she notifies the Freedom of Information Officer;
( 2 ) He or she notifies the requestor in writing within the basic 20-day period stating the reasons for the extension and the date by which he or she expects to be able to issue a determination;
( 3 ) The extension is reasonably necessary to properly process the particular request; and
( 4 ) One or more of the following unusual circumstances require the extension: ( i ) There is a need to search for and collect the records from field facilities or other establishments that are separated from the office processing the appeal;
( ii ) There is a need to search for, collect, and/or appropriately examine a voluminous amount of separate and distinct records which are demanded in a single request; or
( iii ) There is a need for consultation with another agency or among two or more components of the A&TBCB. The General Counsel must conduct the consultation with all practicable speed.
( d ) No extension of the 20-day period may be issued under paragraph (c) of this section which would cause the total of all such extensions and of any extensions issued under § 1120.33(c) to exceed 10 working days.
# Map            Commonwealth of Independent States--Central Asian states.
#### Aultman, Miller *&*Co. v. Nelson *et al.*

(Opinion filed January 25, 1899.)

Appeal from circuit court. Brookings county. Hon. Julian Bennett, Judge.

Action in a justice court by Aultman, Miller & Co. against Andrew Nelson and another. From a judgment there was an appeal to the circuit court; and from an order therein denying plaintiffs motion to dismiss the appeal, it appeals.

Affirmed.

*Jenkins & Farrell,*for appellant.

*Mathews é Murphy,*for respondents.

Corson, P. J.

This is an appeal from an order of the circuit court of Brookings county denying plaintiff’s motion to dismiss -the appeal taken from the judgment rendered by the justice of the'peace. The same question is involved as in the appeal of Aultman, Miller & Co. v. Same Defendants, decided at .this term, and reported in 11 D. 338, 77 N. W. 584; the only difference in the two cases being that the judgment rendered by the-justice in this case was for #114.84, and the undertaking was in double that amount, instead of #220 in the former. This case was, by stipulation, submitted upon the same abstracts and briefs as the former, and must therefore be ruled by that decision. The order of the circuit court is affirmed.
#### §§ 550.152-550.159 [Reserved]
§ 1150.2 Applicability: Buildings and facilities subject to guidelines and standards. ( a ) *Definitions.* As used in this section, the term: *Constructed or altered on behalf of the United States* means acquired by the United States through lease-purchase arrangement, constructed or altered for purchase by the United States, or constructed or altered for the use of the United States.
*Primarily for use by able-bodied military personnel* means expected to be occupied, used, or visited principally by military service personnel. Examples of buildings so intended are barracks, officers' quarters, and closed messes.
*Privately owned residential structure* means a single or multi-family dwelling not owned by a unit or subunit of Federal, state, or local government.
( b ) *Buildings and facilities covered.* Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, the standards issued under the Architectural Barriers Act of 1968, Pub. L. 90-480, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 4151 *et seq.* (including standards of the United States Postal Service) apply to any building or facility— ( 1 ) The intended use for which either— ( i ) Will require that such building or facility be accessible to the public, or
( ii ) May result in employment or residence therein of physically handicapped persons; and
( 2 ) Which is— ( i ) To be constructed or altered by or on behalf of the United States;
( ii ) To be leased in whole or in part by the United States— ( A ) After August 12, 1968, and before January 1, 1977, after construction or alteration in accordance with plans and specifications of the United States; or
( B ) On or after January 1, 1977, including any renewal of a lease entered into before January 1, 1977, which renewal is on or after such date;
( iii ) To be financed in whole or in part by a grant or loan made by the United States after August 12, 1968, if the building or facility may be subject to standards for design, construction, or alteration issued under the law authorizing the grant or loan; or
( iv ) To be constructed under the authority of the National Capital Transportation Act of 1960, the National Capital Transportation Act of 1965, or title III of the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Regulation Compact.
( c ) *Buildings and facilities not covered.* The standards do not apply to— ( 1 ) Any privately owned residential structure, unless it is leased by the Federal government on or after January 1, 1977, for subsidized housing programs; or
( 2 ) Any building or facility on a military installation designed and constructed primarily for use by military personnel.
( d ) Any covered building or facility, as provided in this section, which is designed, constructed, or altered after the effective date of a standard issued which is applicable to the building or facility, shall be designed, constructed, altered, or leased in accordance with the standard. For purposes of this section, any design, construction, alteration or lease for which bids or offers are received before the effective date of an applicable standard, in response to an invitation for bids or request for proposals, is not subject to that standard.