alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1002.10 Camping and food storage. ( a ) The Board may require permits, designate sites or areas, and establish conditions for camping.
( b ) The following are prohibited: ( 1 ) Digging or leveling the ground at a campsite.
( 2 ) Leaving camping equipment, site alterations, or refuse after departing from the campsite.
( 3 ) Camping within 25 feet of a water hydrant or main road, or within 100 feet of a flowing stream, river or body of water, except as designated.
( 4 ) Creating or sustaining unreasonable noise between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m., considering the nature and purpose of the actor's conduct, impact on visitors or tenants, location, and other factors which would govern the conduct of a reasonably prudent person under the circumstances.
( 5 ) The installation of permanent camping facilities.
( 6 ) Displaying wildlife carcasses or other remains or parts thereof.
( 7 ) Connecting to a utility system, except as designated.
( 8 ) Failing to obtain a permit, where required.
( 9 ) Violating conditions which may be established by the Board.
( 10 ) Camping outside of designated sites or areas.
( c ) Violation of the terms and conditions of a permit issued in accordance with this section is prohibited and may result in the suspension or revocation of the permit.
( d ) *Food storage.* The Board may designate all or a portion of the area administered by the Presidio Trust where food, lawfully taken fish or wildlife, garbage, and equipment used to cook or store food must be kept sealed in a vehicle, or in a camping unit that is constructed of solid, non-pliable material, or suspended at least 10 feet above the ground and 4 feet horizontally from a post, tree trunk, or other object, or shall be stored as otherwise designated. Violation of this restriction is prohibited. This restriction does not apply to food that is being transported, consumed, or prepared for consumption.
#### § 82.7 Coordination with States.

If the proposed project is to be conducted within the territorial limits of a state, the Secretary shall not enter into an agreement with a non-Federal interest other than a State without first consulting with the State agency.
#### § 95.905 Authority to operate CBRS stations voided by violation of operating rules.

A person's authorization to operate a CBRS station without an individual license pursuant to § 95.305 is voided if that person violates any of the operating rules in this subpart, this part, or other parts of this chapter.
Editorial Note on Part 622
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 622 appear at 79 FR 57837, Sept. 26, 2014 and at 81 FR 32253, May 23, 2016.

§ 622.474 Gear identification. ( a ) *Reef fish* — ( 1 ) *Fish traps and associated buoys.* All fish traps used or possessed in the EEZ around St. Croix must display the official number specified for the vessel by Puerto Rico or the U.S. Virgin Islands. A fish trap that is fished individually, rather than tied together in a trap line, must have at least one buoy attached that floats on the surface. Fish traps that are tied together in a trap line must have at least one buoy that floats at the surface attached at each end of the trap line. All buoys must display the official number and color code assigned to the vessel by Puerto Rico or the U.S. Virgin Islands, whichever is applicable.
( 2 ) *Presumption of ownership of fish traps.* A fish trap in the EEZ around St. Croix will be presumed to be the property of the most recently documented owner. This presumption will not apply with respect to such traps that are lost or sold if the owner reports the loss or sale within 15 days to the RA.
( 3 ) *Disposition of unmarked fish traps or buoys.* An unmarked fish trap or buoy deployed in the EEZ around St. Croix is illegal and may be disposed of in any appropriate manner by the Assistant Administrator or an authorized officer.
( b ) [Reserved]
( c ) *Spiny lobster* — ( 1 ) *Spiny lobster traps and associated buoys.* All spiny lobster traps used or possessed in the EEZ around St. Croix must display the official number specified for the vessel by Puerto Rico or the U.S. Virgin Islands. A spiny lobster trap that is fished individually, rather than tied together in a trap line, must have at least one buoy attached that floats on the surface. Spiny lobster traps that are tied together in a trap line must have at least one buoy that floats at the surface attached at each end of the trap line. All buoys must display the official number and color code assigned to the vessel by Puerto Rico or the U.S. Virgin Islands, whichever is applicable.
( 2 ) *Presumption of ownership of spiny lobster traps.* A spiny lobster trap in the EEZ around St. Croix will be presumed to be the property of the most recently documented owner. This presumption will not apply with respect to such traps that are lost or sold if the owner reports the loss or sale within 15 days to the RA.
( 3 ) *Disposition of unmarked spiny lobster traps or buoys.* An unmarked spiny lobster trap or buoy deployed in the EEZ around St. Croix is illegal and may be disposed of in any appropriate manner by the Assistant Administrator or an authorized officer.
CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the  Annual  Report of  Colonial  Trust  Company  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-KSB for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John K.
Johnson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


__/s/_John K. Johnson__

John K. Johnson
Chief Executive Officer
July 14, 2004

     This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
subject  to the  knowledge  standard  contained  therein,  and not for any other
purpose.
# EUR-Lex - 12005SA029 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12005SA029

**Act concerning the conditions of accession of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania and the adjustments to the Treaties on which the European Union is founded - PART FOUR:TEMPORARY PROVISIONS - TITLE III:FINANCIAL PROVISIONS - Article 29 **

*
Official Journal L 157 , 21/06/2005 P. 0214 - 0214 *

Article 29

Where the period for multiannual commitments made under the SAPARD programme [14] in relation to afforestation of agricultural land, support for the establishment of producer groups or agri‐environment schemes extends beyond the final permissible date for payments under SAPARD, the outstanding commitments will be covered within the 2007-2013 rural development programme. Should specific transitional measures be necessary in this regard, these shall be adopted in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 50(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 of 21 June 1999 laying down general provisions on the Structural Funds [15].

[14] Council Regulation (EC) No 1268/1999 of 21.6.1999 on Community support for pre-accession measures for agriculture and rural development in the applicant countries of Central and Eastern Europe in the pre-accession period (OJ L 161, 26.6.1999, p. 87). Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2008/2004 (OJ L 349, 25.11.2004, p. 12).

[15] OJ L 161, 26.6.1999, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by the 2003 Act of Accession (OJ L 236, 23.9.2003, p. 33).

--------------------------------------------------
EXHIBIT 23.3



[LETTERHEAD OF MILLER AND LENTS, LTD. APPEARS HERE]



March 15, 2004



XTO Energy Inc.

810 Houston Street

Fort Worth, TX 76102



Re:

XTO Energy Inc. 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K




Gentlemen:



The firm of Miller and Lents, Ltd., consents to the use of its name and to
the use of its report dated March 12, 2004, regarding the XTO Energy Inc. Proved Reserves and Future Net Revenues as of December 31, 2003, in the 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K.



Miller and Lents, Ltd., has no interests in XTO Energy Inc. or in any affiliated companies or subsidiaries and is not to
receive any such interest as payment for such reports and has no director, officer, or employee otherwise connected with XTO Energy Inc. We are not employed by XTO Energy Inc. on a contingent basis.



Yours very truly,MILLER AND LENTS, LTD.By

/s/ JAMES PEARSONJames PearsonChairman
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 524 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 524

To eliminate the disparity in sentencing for cocaine offenses, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 16, 2023

Mr. Booker (for himself, Mr. Graham, Mr. Durbin, Mr. Tillis, Mr. Coons, 
  Ms. Lummis, Mr. Whitehouse, and Mr. Paul) introduced the following 
    bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the 
                               Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To eliminate the disparity in sentencing for cocaine offenses, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Eliminating a Quantifiably Unjust 
Application of the Law Act'' or the ``EQUAL Act''.

SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF INCREASED PENALTIES FOR COCAINE OFFENSES WHERE 
              THE COCAINE INVOLVED IS COCAINE BASE.

    (a) Controlled Substances Act.--The following provisions of the 
Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 801 et seq.) are repealed:
            (1) Clause (iii) of section 401(b)(1)(A) (21 U.S.C. 
        841(b)(1)(A)).
            (2) Clause (iii) of section 401(b)(1)(B) (21 U.S.C. 
        841(b)(1)(B)).
    (b) Controlled Substances Import and Export Act.--The following 
provisions of the Controlled Substances Import and Export Act (21 
U.S.C. 951 et seq.) are repealed:
            (1) Subparagraph (C) of section 1010(b)(1) (21 U.S.C. 
        960(b)(1)).
            (2) Subparagraph (C) of section 1010(b)(2) (21 U.S.C. 
        960(b)(2)).
    (c) Applicability to Pending and Past Cases.--
            (1) Pending cases.--This section, and the amendments made 
        by this section, shall apply to any sentence imposed after the 
        date of enactment of this Act, regardless of when the offense 
        was committed.
            (2) Past cases.--In the case of a defendant who, before the 
        date of enactment of this Act, was convicted or sentenced for a 
        Federal offense involving cocaine base, the sentencing court 
        may, on motion of the defendant, the Bureau of Prisons, the 
        attorney for the Government, or on its own motion, impose a 
        reduced sentence after considering the factors set forth in 
        section 3553(a) of title 18, United States Code.
                                 <all>
```
Case 16-28489 Doc 6 Filed 09/06/16 Entered 09/06/16 13:01:29 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2
Case 16-28489 Doc 6 Filed 09/06/16 Entered 09/06/16 13:01:29 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20463

ADVISORY OPINION 2023-08

(COWBOY ANALYTICS)

STATEMENT OF VICE CHAIRMAN SEAN J. COOKSEY AND 

COMMISSIONERS ALLEN J. DICKERSON AND JAMES E. “TREY” TRAINOR, III

Today, the Commission considered an advisory opinion request from Cowboy Analytics, 

LLC, asking several questions about its operations as a conduit committee that sells merchandise 

and solicits contributions for federal candidates. We supported an answer (Draft A) that concluded, 

among other things, that under the requestor’s proposal, it would not be required to report its costs 

of producing and distributing political merchandise, nor the cost of its solicitations, as independent 

expenditures. 

In addition to the reasons set out in Draft A, we believe those answers follow from the 

Commission’s decision in LRA 1163 (Madison Project, Inc.). The draft answer could not cite that

authority, however, because the Commission’s action is not yet public. Regardless, the 

Commission’s failure to provide answers today consistent with that precedent, in our view, creates 

unnecessary confusion and inconsistency in the law. 

_________________________________ December 14, 2023

Sean J. Cooksey Date

Vice Chairman

__________________________________ December 14, 2023

Allen J. Dickerson Date

Commissioner

_________________________________ December 14, 2023

James E. “Trey” Trainor, III Date

Commissioner
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 24, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 05-40966

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ALBERTO CRUZ-RANGEL,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:04-CR-874-ALL

--------------------

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Alberto CruzRangel raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres

v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that a

prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. 

§ 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The

Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the

judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
# EUR-Lex - 11965F/PRO/PRI/16 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11965F/PRO/PRI/16

**TREATY ESTABLISHING A SINGLE COUNCIL AND A SINGLE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, PROTOCOL ON THE PRIVILEGES AND IMMUNITIES OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, CHAPTER V: OFFICIALS AND OTHER SERVANTS OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, ARTICLE 16 **

*
Official Journal L 152 , 13/07/1967 P. 0015 *

++++

ARTICLE 16

THE COUNCIL SHALL , ACTING ON A PROPOSAL FROM THE COMMISSION AND AFTER CONSULTING THE OTHER INSTITUTIONS CONCERNED , DETERMINE THE CATEGORIES OF OFFICIALS AND OTHER SERVANTS OF THE COMMUNITIES TO WHOM THE PROVISIONS OF ARTICLE 12 , THE SECOND PARAGRAPH OF ARTICLE 13 , AND ARTICLE 14 SHALL APPLY , IN WHOLE OR IN PART .

THE NAMES , GRADES AND ADDRESSES OF OFFICIALS AND OTHER SERVANTS INCLUDED IN SUCH CATEGORIES SHALL BE COMMUNICATED PERIODICALLY TO THE GOVERNMENTS OF THE MEMBER STATES .
#### Mattie M. Mackey, appellee, v. John N. Frenzer, appellant.

Filed April 17, 1913.

No. 17,141.

Divorce: Custody oe Children: Evidence: Review. This appeal presents only the question of fact as to the sufficiency of the evidence to support the decree, and upon consideration of the evidence the order of the district court is affirmed.

Appeal from the district court for Douglas county: George A. Day, Judge.

*Affirmed.*

*Will FT. Thompson,*for appellant.

*John O. Cowin*and *M. O. Cunningham, contra.*

Sedgwick, J.

In December, 1904. the plaintiff obtained a divorce from defendant by the decree of the district court for Douglas county. There were three children, a girl four or five years old at that time, and two boys a little older. By the decree the custody of tlie girl was given to the plaintiff, and the boys were confided to the care of the defendant. The plaintiff afterwards married Hiram B. Mackey, and removed from Omaha to Minneapolis, Minnesota. She took the girl with her, and afterwards it seems that the *585boys left their father and were with her at Minneapolis. There has been continual disagreement between the plaintiff and defendant since long before they were divorced. This plaintiff began these supplementary proceedings in the district court for Douglas county to obtain the custody of the boys also. The defendant answered, and made a cross-application for the custody of the girl. Afterwards, and before the hearing, the plaintiff dismissed her application for the custody of the boys, and the matter was heard before the district court upon the defendant’s application for the custody of the girl.

The ground for this application relied upon by defendant appears to be that the plaintiff has taken the girl out of the jurisdiction of the court, and that the plaintiff’s present husband, Mr. Mackey, has such a bad character and reputation that the plaintiff’s home is an unfit place for the girl. Mr. Mackey formerly resided at Minden, in this state, and several witnesses who knew him some five or ten years ago testified that he was addicted to the use of intoxicating drink's, and accustomed to bad associations, and the use of vile and profane language. The plaintiff admits that there was some ground for complaint of Mr. Mackey formerly, and testifies, and the evidence tends to show, that Mr. Mackey for several years has been an industrious and quiet man. The plaintiff appears to be well situated in her present home, and the girl has suitable surroundings and is well cared for. The district court found that it was not in the interest of the girl to take her from the custody of her mother under the existing conditions and circumstances, and that the father was not so well situated to care for her as is a mother, and confirmed the former order of the court confiding the custody of the girl to the mother. We are satisfied that the evidence justifies this conclusion, and the order of the district court is therefore

Affirmed. •

Reese, C. J., Barnes and Letton, JJ., concur.

Rose, Fawcett and Hamer, JJ., not sitting.
FILED U.S. COURT OF AP P EALS E LEV EN T HC IRC U IT April 21, 2008 THOMAS K. KAH

N CLERK

Honora ble C. Roger Vinson, United States District Judge f or the Nor

thern District of F lorida, * sitti ngby designation. [ DO NO T P UB L I S H] I N THE UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS F O R T H E E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT

________________________ N o. 07- 14637

________________________ D . C . D ocketN o. 06 -000 53 -C V -R L V -4 S A B R I N A D A N T , M A R G A R E T H I N S O N , P la in tif f s - A p p e lla n ts , v ersu s B E A U L I E U O F A M E R I C A , I N C ., D e f e n d a n t- A p p e lle e .

________________________ A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e N o r th e rn D is tr ic t o f G e o r g ia

_________________________ ( A p r i l21, 2008) B ef ore T JO F L A T and M A R C U S , C i rc ui tJudg es , and V IN S O N , D i stri ctJudg e. * P E R C U R I A M:2

I n thi s e m pl oym e ntdi s c r i m i na t i on c a s e , S abr i naD a nta nd M a r ga r e tH i ns on ( t oge the r , “ appe l l a nt s ” ) appe a l f r om a n or de rof t h e U ni t e d S t a t e s D i s tr i c tC our tf or the N o rt h ern D i s tr i c tof G e or gi agr a nt i ng f

i na l s um m a ry j udgm e nti n f a vorof the d e f e n d a n t, B e a u lie u o f

A m e r ic a , I n c . ( “B e a u lie u ” ) . A ppe l l a nt s c l a i m tha tB e a ul i e u di s c r i m i na t e d ag ai n st the m i n a va r i e ty of w a y s , in c lu d in g g e n d e rd is c r im in a tio n , b y r e f u s in g to a w a r d th e m c e r ta in pr om ot i ons a nd t ol e r a t i ng a s e xua l l y hos t i l e w ork e nvi r onm e nt , i n vi ol a t i on of T i t l e V I I of

the C i vi l R i ght s A c tof 1964 ( “ T i t l e V I I ” ) , 42 U . S . C . § 2 0 0 0 e e ts e q. H i nson al so cl ai m s thatB eaul i eu vi ol at ed the A m er i ca ns w i th D i sab il it i es A ct ( “A D A ”), 4 2 U . S . C . § 1 2 1 0 1 , b y req u i ri n g h er t o t ak e o n ad d ed resp o n si b i l ity w i thoutm a ki n g r e a s onabl e a c c om m oda t i on f orhe rhe a r tc ondi t i on. F i na l l y , D a nt al l eges thatB eaul i eu re tali at ed agai nsther f or com pl ai ni ng abou ti t s host i l e w ork e n v ir o n m e n t in v io la tio n o f T itle V I I , 4 2 U .S .C . § 2 0 0 0 e - 3 ( a ) . A ft ertho roug h revi ew , w e a ff i rm the fi nal j ud gm en t o f th e d i stri ctcourt ba s e d on the de t a i l e d an d w e l l - r e a s one d R e por ta nd R e c om m e nda t i on of the m a g is tr a te ju d g e , d a te d S e p te m b e r1 8 , 2 0 0 7 . AF F I R ME D.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          32,191
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                   183
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    310,449
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          20,786
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            20,601
<LOANS>                                        849,767
<ALLOWANCE>                                    (7,431)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,274,206
<DEPOSITS>                                     799,176
<SHORT-TERM>                                   188,500
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              9,424
<LONG-TERM>                                    152,898
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        66,318
<OTHER-SE>                                      13,790
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,274,206
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 66,685
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               21,390
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    39
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                88,114
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              31,999
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              49,647
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           38,467
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    1,580
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 318
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 29,651
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 17,989
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      12,304
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,304
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.58
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.58
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.83
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,312
<LOANS-PAST>                                     2,244
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 6,643
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  (1,570)
<RECOVERIES>                                       778
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                7,431
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             7,431
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>