alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 172 (Wednesday, September 6, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52601-52602]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-7461]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Public Notice for a Change in Use of Aeronautical Property at 
Manchester-Boston Regional Airport, Manchester, NH

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Request for public comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is requesting public comment on the City of 
Manchester, New Hampshire's request to change a portion (approx. 58 
acres) of airport property from aeronautical use to non-aeronautical 
use. The property is at various locations on the Airport. The State of 
New Hampshire will acquire a combination of fee and easements for 
construction of an access road from State Route 3 to the Airport. The 
conveyances include property rights for both construction and 
environmental mitigation. The land was acquired as follows: Surplus 
Property Deeds dated September 27, 1962, June 4, 1975 (approx. 33 
acres; FAAP Project Nos. 9-27-018-C603 and 9-27-018-C605 (approx. 6.5 
acres); and City funds (approx. 18 acres).
    The disposition of proceeds from the disposal of airport property 
will be in accordance with FAA's Policy and Procedures Concerning the 
Use of Airport Revenue, published in the Federal Register on February 
16, 1999.

DATES: Comments musts be received on or before October 6, 2006.

ADDRESSES: Documents are available for review by appointment by 
contacting Mr. Richard Fixler, Assistant Airport Director, Engineering 
& Planning, Manchester-Boston Regional Airport, Manchester, NH, 
Telephone 603-624-6539 or by contacting Donna R. Witte, Federal 
Aviation Administration, 16 New England Executive Park,

[[Page 52602]]

Burlington, Massachusetts, Telephone 781-238-7624.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Donna R. Witte at the Federal Aviation 
Administration, 12 New England Executive Park, Burlington, 
Massachusetts 01803, Telephone 781-238-7624.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 125 of the Wendell H. Ford Aviation 
Investment and Reform Act for the 21st Century (AIR 21) requires the 
FAA to provide an opportunity for public notice and comment to the 
``waiver'' or ``modification'' of a sponsor's Federal obligation to use 
certain airport property for aeronautical purposes.

    Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on August 21, 2006.
LaVerne F. Reid,
Manager, Airports Division, New England Region.
[FR Doc. 06-7461 Filed 9-5-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21



                         Subsidiaries of the Registrant

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                      Jurisdiction of Incorporation
Name                                   Form of Organization           or Organization
----                                   --------------------           -----------------------------
<S>                                    <C>                            <C>
Neodata Services Limited               Corporation                    Republic of Ireland

Sarsfield Systems Limited              Corporation                    Republic of Ireland

Neodata Creative Services, Inc.        Corporation                    Delaware

Lacek Systems and Software, Inc.       Corporation                    Minnesota

Lacek Travel Services, Inc.            Corporation                    Minnesota

World Class Travel Assoc., Inc.        Corporation                    Minnesota

The Lacek Group, Inc. - Korea          Joint Venture                  Korea

The Lacek Group PTY Limited            Corporation                    Australia
</TABLE>
#### GEORGE ALGER v. LEWIS MORRILL.

May Term, 1896.

*Evidence.*

Upon the issue whether the defendant had accounted for all the hay which he drew away, evidence of the space occupied by the hay taken and the number of cubic feet required to make a ton was admissible.

General assumpsit. Plea, the general issue. Trial by jury at the September term, 1895, Orleans county, Start, J., presiding. Verdict and judgment for the plaintiff. The defendant excepts.

*John Youug*and *Theophilus Grout*for the defendant.

*Cook & Redmond*for the plaintiff.

TYLER, J.

It appeared that the plaintiff sold the defendant all the hay in the barn on the plaintiff’s farm, to be weighed as drawn by the defendant and paid for by him at the actual weight. The first load, which was to be as large as the defendant could draw, to be at the rate of eight dollars a ton, and the remainder, which was of a' better quality, at ten dollars a ton. The defendant’s evidence tended to show that he drew all the hay at four loads, and that the total weight was nine thousand eight hundred and thirty pounds. The plaintiff claimed that the defendant'did not account for all the hay be drew, and it was an issue at the trial whether the nine *599thousand eight hundred and thirty pounds comprised all the hay drawn by him.

The plaintiff was permitted to introduce evidence tending to show the extent of the space in the barn from which the hay was taken, and how much space a ton of hay would occupy. The defendant contends that this was error on the ground that no evidence had been introduced tending to show that the defendant in fact drew more than four loads, or that their weight was more than nine thousand eight hundred and thirty pounds.

The evidence was admitted upon a statement being made by the plaintiff’s counsel that later in the trial he would introduce evidence “tending to show that the defendant took hay from the barn that-he did not get weighed under the agreement.” But it was clearly admissible as substantive evidence tending to establish the plaintiff’s claim. It was competent to show that the amount of hay accounted for could not have filled a given space — that it would have required more than nine thousand eight hundred and thirty pounds to fill it. The question whether this evidence could be relied upon, considered by itself and in connection with the defendant’s denial that he drew more than four loads, seems to have been carefully submitted by the court to the jury.

*Judgment affirmed.*
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of
our reports included in this Form 10-K, into TPC Corporation's previously filed
Registration Statement on Form S-8 File No. 33-98924. It should be noted that
we have not audited any financial statements of the Company subsequent to
December 31, 1996 or performed any audit procedures subsequent to the date of
our report.


                                             /s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

                                             ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Houston, Texas
March 10, 1997
Tribal Community and Justice Profile 

Applicant Name: 

Tribal Community and Justice Profile (20%) 

You may enter as much or as little text as you need to fully describe your community as long as the total 

number of pages for the entire Tribal Narrative Profile does not exceed 10 pages, double-spaced, with 

12-point font size. Note that template questions do not count towards the page limit. The profile is 

intended to give reviewers an overview of the tribe’s overall criminal justice system(s) and concerns. 

Remember that the individuals reviewing the application may not be familiar with the community, so 

descriptions should be as clear and detailed as possible. Be sure that every question is answered. If 

there are questions that you are unable to answer, provide an explanation as to why the information is 

unavailable. 

1. Describe the general form of your Tribal Government. 

2. Briefly describe the tribal justice system, including prevention or intervention initiatives for 

members at risk of involvement, or already involved, in the justice system (youth or adult); law 

enforcement, including any cross-jurisdictional agreements; courts; alternative dispute 

resolution; corrections, including juvenile detention facilities; services for victims and survivors 

of crime (e.g., violent crime, nonviolent crime, drug-related crime, child abuse, elder abuse, 

domestic violence, sexual assault, dating violence, stalking, human trafficking, identity theft, 

restorative practices, etc.); tribal reentry programs; and sex offender registry obligations. If 

services are not available within the tribe, please describe how they are accessed or provided. 

3. Please briefly discuss the tribe’s overall state of public safety and indicate the crime and public 

safety problem(s) that the tribe plans to address through this proposed grant funding and how 

they were chosen as priorities. This may include community demographics that impact public 

safety, such as visitor populations, neighboring cities, etc. 

Please note: A detailed description of the problem(s), including data and a description of current or 

previous efforts, will be requested in each separate Purpose Area narrative. 

FY 2024 

Page 1
| Entity                                                             | Jurisdiction of Formation                                          |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Severn Savings Bank, FSB.                                          | United States of America (federally chartered savings association) |
| Louis Hyatt, Inc. (d/b/a Hyatt Commercial)                         | Maryland                                                           |
| HS West, LLC                                                       | Maryland                                                           |
| Severn Financial Services Corporation                              | Maryland                                                           |
| SSB Realty Holdings, LLC                                           | Maryland                                                           |
| SSB Realty Holdings II, LLC                                        | Maryland                                                           |
| Homeowners Title and Escrow Corporation                            | Maryland                                                           |
| SBI Mortgage Company                                               | Maryland                                                           |
| Crownsville Development Corporation (d/b/a Annapolis Equity Group) | Maryland                                                           |
| Crownsville Holdings I, LLC                                        | Maryland                                                           |

----
§ 76.977 Minority and educational programming used in lieu of designated commercial leased access capacity. ( a ) A cable operator required by this section to designate channel capacity for commercial use pursuant to 47 U.S.C. 532, may use any such channel capacity for the provision of programming from a qualified minority programming source or from any qualified educational programming sources, whether or not such source is affiliated with cable operator. The channel capacity used to provide programming from a qualified minority programming source or from any qualified educational programming source pursuant to this section may not exceed 33 percent of the channel capacity designated pursuant to 47 U.S.C. 532 and must be located on a tier with more than 50 percent subscriber penetration.
( b ) For purposes of this section, a qualified minority programming source is a programming source that devotes substantially all of its programming to coverage of minority viewpoints, or to programming directed at members of minority groups, and which is over 50 percent minority-owned.
( c ) For purposes of this section, a qualified educational programming source is a programming source that devotes substantially all of its programming to educational or instructional programming that promotes public understanding of mathematics, the sciences, the humanities, or the arts and has a documented annual expenditure on programming exceeding $15 million. The annual expenditure on programming means all annual costs incurred by the programming source to produce or acquire programs which are scheduled to be televised, and specifically excludes marketing, promotion, satellite transmission and operational costs, and general administrative costs.
( d ) For purposes of paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, *substantially all* means that 90% or more of the programming offered must be devoted to minority or educational purposes, as defined in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, respectively.
( e ) For purposes of paragraph (b) of this section, “minority” is defined as in 47 U.S.C. 309(i)(3)(c)(ii) to include Blacks, Hispanics, American Indians, Alaska Natives, Asians and Pacific Islanders.
[58 FR 29753, May 21, 1993, as amended at 62 FR 11382, Mar. 12, 1997]
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 182 (Wednesday, September 20, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 55047]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-7789]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary


Aviation Proceedings, Agreements Filed the Week Ending August 25, 
2006

    The following Agreements were filed with the Department of 
Transportation under the sections 412 and 414 of the Federal Aviation 
Act, as amended (49 U.S.C. 1382 and 1384) and procedures governing 
proceedings to enforce these provisions. Answers may be filed within 21 
days after the filing of the application.
    Docket Number: OST-2006-25707.
    Date Filed: August 22, 2006.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject: TC2 Europe-Middle East Resolutions and Specified Fares 
Tables (Memo 0226), Intended effective date: 1 January 2007.

    Docket Number: OST-2006-25716.
    Date Filed: August 23, 2006.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject: TC2 Within Middle East Resolutions and Specified Fares 
Tables (Memo 0164), Intended effective date: 1 January 2007.

    Docket Number: OST-2006-25717.
    Date Filed: August 23, 2006.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject: TC23/123 Middle East-TC3 Mail Vote 504, Special Passenger 
Amending Resolution 010w, From Pakistan to Jeddah (Memo 0300), Intended 
effective date: 01 September 2006.

    Docket Number: OST-2006-25718.
    Date Filed: August 23, 2006.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject: TC2 Europe-Africa Mail Vote 505, Special Passenger 
Amending Resolution 010x, From Libya to Europe, Middle East, (Memo 
0239/Memo 0147), Intended effective date: 7 September 2006.

    Docket Number: OST-2006-25726.
    Date: Filed August 24, 2006.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject: TC12 North Atlantic Canada-Europe, Resolutions and 
Specified Fares Tables (Memo 0122), Minutes: TC12 North Atlantic 
Canada, USA-Europe Minutes, (Memo 0123), Intended effective date: 1 
November 2006.

    Docket Number: OST-2006-25727.
    Date Filed: August 24, 2006.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject: TC12 North Atlantic USA-Europe and Mail Vote 493, (except 
Austria, Belgium, Czech Republic, Finland, France, Germany, Iceland, 
Italy, Netherlands, Scandinavia, Switzerland), (Memo 0195), Technical 
Correction: TC12 North Atlantic USA-Europe and Mail Vote 493, (Memo 
0196), Minutes: TC12 North Atlantic Canada, USA-Europe Minutes, (Memo 
0197), Intended effective date: 1 November 2006.

Renee V. Wright,
Program Manager, Docket Operations, Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. 06-7789 Filed 9-19-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Celtron International, Inc. on  Form  10QSB  for  the  period  ending  September 30, 2005,  as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report'),  I, Amanda Harington,  Chief  Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to  18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as  adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)   The information contained  in  the  Report  fairly presents, in all material  respects,  the financial condition and result of  operations  of  the Company.







/s/ Amanada Harington

_____________________

Amanda Harington

Chief Executive Officer

Date: November 12, 2005
###### Editorial Note on Part 300

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 300 appear at 64 FR 44431, Aug. 16, 1999, and at 76 FR 59305, Sept. 26, 2011.

#### § 300.225 Eastern High Seas Special Management Area.

The owner and operator of a fishing vessel of the United States used for commercial fishing for HMS is prohibited from engaging in transshipment in the Eastern High Seas Special Management Area.

[83 FR 33870, July 18, 2018]
Case 16-26253 Doc 8 Filed 08/17/16 Entered 08/18/16 09:37:19 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2


                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 No. 33-66462) pertaining to the Wesco Auto Parts Corporation 1992
Incentive Stock Option Plan, (Form S-8 No. 33-44544) pertaining to the Wesco
Auto Parts Corporation 1991 Christmas Bonus Plan, the Wesco Auto Parts
Corporation 1991 Incentive Stock Option Plan and the Wesco Auto Parts
Corporation 1990 Incentive Stock Option Plan, (Form S-8, No. 33-71380)
pertaining to the Wesco Auto Parts Corporation Director's Stock Option Plans,
Wesco Auto Parts Corporation Software Consultant's Stock Option Plan and the
Wesco Auto Parts Corporation Consultant's Compensation Plan, (Form S-3 No.
33-89810) pertaining to the registration of 5,231,583 shares of Reddi Brake
Supply Corporation's common stock, (Form S-3 No. 33-98838) pertaining to the
registration of 1,100,478 shares of Reddi Brake Supply Corporation's common
stock of our report dated September 7, 1995, except for Note 6, as to which the
date is October 12, 1995 with respect to the consolidated financial statements
and schedule of Reddi Brake Supply Corporation included in the Annual Report
(Form 10-K) for the year ended June 30, 1996.



                                                 Ernst & Young LLP


Los Angeles, California
October 11, 1996
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 5093 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 5093

 To sunset the Advisory Committee on the Records of Congress, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 18, 2024

  Mr. Peters (for himself and Mr. Lankford) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland 
                   Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To sunset the Advisory Committee on the Records of Congress, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Advisory Committee on the Records of 
Congress Sunset Act of 2024''.

SEC. 2. MANAGEMENT AND PRESERVATION OF THE RECORDS OF CONGRESS.

    (a) Definitions.--In this section--
            (1) the term ``Archivist'' means the Archivist of the 
        United States;
            (2) the term ``Clerk'' means the Clerk of the House of 
        Representatives;
            (3) the term ``Director'' means the Director of the Center 
        for Legislative Archives of the National Archives, or any 
        successor thereto;
            (4) the term ``Member of Congress'' means a Member of the 
        Senate or the House of Representatives, a Delegate to the House 
        of Representatives, and the Resident Commissioner from Puerto 
        Rico; and
            (5) the term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary of the 
        Senate.
    (b) Reporting.--Not later than February 1 of the second calendar 
year beginning after the date of enactment of this Act, and every 
calendar year thereafter, the Director shall submit to the Archivist, 
the Secretary, and the Clerk a report on the management and 
preservation of the records of Congress during the previous year.
    (c) Review.--The Archivist, the Secretary, and the Clerk shall meet 
to review the management and preservation of the records of Congress 
and Members of Congress--
            (1) not later than 60 days after the date on which the 
        Director submits a report under subsection (b); and
            (2) not later than 180 days after the date on which an 
        individual is appointed to the position of Archivist, 
        Secretary, or Clerk.
    (d) Sunset of Advisory Committee.--Effective on the date that is 60 
days after the date of enactment of this Act, title 44 of the United 
States Code is amended--
            (1) by striking chapter 27;
            (2) by striking the table of sections relating to chapter 
        27; and
            (3) in the table of chapters, by striking the item relating 
        to chapter 27.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit
21.1
   SUBSIDIARIES
OF THE QUIGLEY CORPORATION
 
 Subsidiaries
              State
      or other
                  Jurisdiction
      of
                  IncorporationDarius
      International Inc.
              DelawareInnerlight
      Inc.
              DelawareInnerlight
      Global Pte. LTD
              SingaporeInnerlight
      Global Company
              Taiwan
 
 On
February 29, 2008, the Company sold this wholly owned subsidiary, Darius
International Inc. (“Darius”) to InnerLight Holdings, Inc.  (See Item
7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operation” and Note 17 “Subsequent Events” for additional
information.)
 
 Quigley
      Pharma Inc.
              DelawareQuigley
      Manufacturing Inc.
              Delaware
 
 The above
subsidiaries are included in the consolidated financial statements for the year
ended December 31, 2007.