alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 635.3 Relation to other laws. ( a ) The relation of this part to other laws is set forth in § 600.705 of this chapter and in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section.
( b ) In accordance with regulations issued under the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972, as amended, it is unlawful for a commercial fishing vessel, a vessel owner, or a master or operator of a vessel to engage in fisheries for HMS in the Atlantic Ocean, unless the vessel owner or authorized representative has complied with specified requirements including, but not limited to, registration, exemption certificates, decals, and reports, as contained in part 229 of this title.
( c ) General provisions on facilitation of enforcement, penalties, and enforcement policy applicable to all domestic fisheries are set forth in §§ 600.730, 600.735, and § 600.740 of this chapter, respectively.
( d ) An activity that is otherwise prohibited by this part may be conducted if authorized as scientific research activity, exempted fishing or exempted educational activity, or for public display, as specified in § 635.32.
[64 FR 29135, May 28, 1999, as amended at 68 FR 74784, Dec. 24, 2003]
Exhibit
32





CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Can-Cal Resources Ltd., a Nevada
corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,
2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"),
Michael Hogan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Michael Hogan,
Principal Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to §906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to his
knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








/s/
      Michael HoganBy:
      Michael HoganIts:
      Chief Executive Officer, Chairman





/s/
      Michael HoganBy:
      Michael HoganIts:
      Principal Financial Officer








November
12, 2010





[A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Can-Cal Resources Ltd. and will be retained by it and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]
### -82 -80 -78 -76 -74

36 38 40 

## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 

### 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 06/01 

## NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

# Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 01 Jun 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.44 N 77.04 WMeters AGL 

## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■


## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■ 

## ★ ● ● ● ●


## ★ ● ● ● ●
Page 1 of 1

Meeting Summary: Triclosan Post-RED DCI Meeting with Technical Registrant 

March 29, 2012, 2:00 PM to 3:30 PM 

Room S-8671, 2777 S. Crystal Drive, Arlington, VA 22202 

Participants

Microban International, Ltd.: Neil K. Snyder, Matt Richter* 

The Accord Group: Pat Quinn 

Toxrac: Martin Bernstein 

ToXcel: Michele Loftus, Niki Cowen, Alan Katz 

EPA: Nader Elkassabany, Donna Randall, Jim Breithaupt, Rebecca von dem Hagen 

*participated via conference call 

Summary

On Thursday, March 29, 2012 the Antimicrobials Division hosted a meeting with 

Microban International, Ltd., the technical registrant of triclosan. The purpose of the 

meeting was to discuss study protocols submitted by the registrant for the fish and oyster 

bioconcentration factor (BCF) studies being called-in through the post-RED Data Call-In 

(DCI) issued in October 2011. After ToXcel, the consultant for Microban, presented an 

overview, the Agency provided feedback on the protocols for the 2 BCF studies. 

Information on the LODs and LOQs proposed for the study were not provided to the 

Agency in the initial submission; therefore, the Agency reserves the right to comment on 

this portion of the protocols. The group also discussed other post-RED DCI issues such 

as waiver requests and study submissions. 

Next Steps

The registrant will re-submit the protocols to the Agency prior to initiation of the study. 

Upon receipt of the surface water monitoring study results, the Agency will schedule 

another meeting with the registrant to discuss.
No. 11-5814.

#### Purchase *v.*Florida.

Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 4th Dist. Certiorari denied.
II

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4543

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

AUGUST 9 (legislative day, AUGUST 8), 1994

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and

Public Works

SEPTEMBER 27 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 12), 1994

Reported by Mr. BAUCUS, without amendment

AN ACT

To designate the United States courthouse to be constructed

at 907 Richland Street in Columbia, South Carolina,

as the ‘‘Matthew J. Perry, Jr. United States Courthouse’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 The United States courthouse to be constructed at

5 907 Richland Street in Columbia, South Carolina, shall

6 be known and designated as the ‘‘Matthew J. Perry, Jr.

7 United States Courthouse’’.
2

•HR 4543 RS

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the United

4 States courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed

5 to be a reference to the ‘‘Matthew J. Perry, Jr. United

6 States Courthouse’’.

Passed the House of Representatives August 8,

1994.

Attest: DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

Clerk.

Calendar No. 662

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4543

AN ACT

To designate the United States courthouse to be

United States Courthouse’’.South Carolina, as the ‘‘Matthew J. Perry, Jr.constructed at 907 Richland Street in Columbia,

SEPTEMBER 27 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 12), 1994

Reported without amendment
§ 402.16 Reinitiation of consultation. ( a ) Reinitiation of consultation is required and shall be requested by the Federal agency, where discretionary Federal involvement or control over the action has been retained or is authorized by law and: ( 1 ) If the amount or extent of taking specified in the incidental take statement is exceeded;
( 2 ) If new information reveals effects of the action that may affect listed species or critical habitat in a manner or to an extent not previously considered;
( 3 ) If the identified action is subsequently modified in a manner that causes an effect to the listed species or critical habitat that was not considered in the biological opinion or written concurrence; or
( 4 ) If a new species is listed or critical habitat designated that may be affected by the identified action.
( b ) An agency shall not be required to reinitiate consultation after the approval of a land management plan prepared pursuant to 43 U.S.C. 1712 or 16 U.S.C. 1604 upon listing of a new species or designation of new critical habitat if the land management plan has been adopted by the agency as of the date of listing or designation, provided that any authorized actions that may affect the newly listed species or designated critical habitat will be addressed through a separate action-specific consultation. This exception to reinitiation of consultation shall not apply to those land management plans prepared pursuant to 16 U.S.C. 1604 if: ( 1 ) Fifteen years have passed since the date the agency adopted the land management plan prepared pursuant to 16 U.S.C. 1604; and
( 2 ) Five years have passed since the enactment of Public Law 115-141 [March 23, 2018] or the date of the listing of a species or the designation of critical habitat, whichever is later.
[51 FR 19957, June 3, 1986, as amended at 84 FR 45017, Aug. 27, 2019; 89 FR 24298, Apr. 5, 2024]
# EUR-Lex - 12002M023 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 12002M023

**Treaty on European Union (Nice consolidated version) - Title V: Provisions on a common foreign and security policy - Article 23 **

*
Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0018 - 0018 Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0160 - Consolidated version *

Treaty on European Union (Nice consolidated version)

Title V: Provisions on a common foreign and security policy

Article 23

Article 23

1. Decisions under this title shall be taken by the Council acting unanimously. Abstentions by members present in person or represented shall not prevent the adoption of such decisions.

When abstaining in a vote, any member of the Council may qualify its abstention by making a formal declaration under the present subparagraph. In that case, it shall not be obliged to apply the decision, but shall accept that the decision commits the Union. In a spirit of mutual solidarity, the Member State concerned shall refrain from any action likely to conflict with or impede Union action based on that decision and the other Member States shall respect its position. If the members of the Council qualifying their abstention in this way represent more than one third of the votes weighted in accordance with Article 205(2) of the Treaty establishing the European Community, the decision shall not be adopted.

2. By derogation from the provisions of paragraph 1, the Council shall act by qualified majority:

- when adopting joint actions, common positions or taking any other decision on the basis of a common strategy,

- when adopting any decision implementing a joint action or a common position,

- when appointing a special representative in accordance with Article 18(5).

If a member of the Council declares that, for important and stated reasons of national policy, it intends to oppose the adoption of a decision to be taken by qualified majority, a vote shall not be taken. The Council may, acting by a qualified majority, request that the matter be referred to the European Council for decision by unanimity.

The votes of the members of the Council shall be weighted in accordance with Article 205(2) of the Treaty establishing the European Community. For their adoption, decisions shall require at least 62 votes in favour, cast by at least 10 members(5).

This paragraph shall not apply to decisions having military or defence implications.

3. For procedural questions, the Council shall act by a majority of its members.
# EUR-Lex - 12004V155 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V155

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART III — THE POLICIES AND FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - TITLE III — INTERNAL POLICIES AND ACTION - CHAPTER I — INTERNAL MARKET - Section 3 — Free movement of goods - Subsection 3 — Prohibition of quantitative restrictions - Article III-155 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0066 - 0066 *

Article III-155

1. Member States shall adjust any State monopolies of a commercial character so as to ensure that no discrimination regarding the conditions under which goods are procured and marketed exists between nationals of Member States.

This Article shall apply to any body through which a Member State, in law or in fact, either directly or indirectly supervises, determines or appreciably influences imports or exports between Member States. It shall likewise apply to monopolies delegated by the State to others.

2. Member States shall refrain from introducing any new measure which is contrary to the principles laid down in paragraph 1 or which restricts the scope of the Articles dealing with the prohibition of customs duties and quantitative restrictions between Member States.

3. If a State monopoly of a commercial character has rules which are designed to make it easier to dispose of agricultural products or obtain for them the best return, steps should be taken in applying this Article to ensure equivalent safeguards for the employment and standard of living of the producers concerned.

--------------------------------------------------
#### § 23.35 What are the requirements for an import permit?

(a) *Purpose.* Article III(3) of the Treaty sets out the conditions under which a Management Authority can issue an import permit.

(b) *U.S. application forms.* Complete the appropriate form for the proposed activity and submit it to the U.S. Management Authority:

| Type of application for an import permit for an Appendix-I specimen | Form no. |
| --- | --- |
| (1) CITES: Southern African Leopard, African Elephant, and Namibian Southern White Rhinoceros Sport-hunted Trophies Appendix-I Plants Appendix-I Wildlife Appendix-I Biological Samples | 3-200-19 3-200-35 3-200-37 3-200-29 |
| (2) Endangered Species Act and CITES: ESA Plants ESA Sport-hunted Trophies ESA Wildlife | 3-200-36 3-200-20 3-200-37 |
| (3) Marine Mammal Protection Act and CITES: Marine Mammals | 3-200-43 |
| (4) Wild Bird Conservation Act and CITES: Personal Pet Bird Under an Approved Cooperative Breeding Program Scientific Research or Zoological Breeding/Display | 3-200-46 3-200-48 3-200-47 |

(c) *Criteria.* The criteria in this [paragraph (c)](/on/2024-09-20/title-50/section-23.35#p-23.35(c)) apply to the issuance and acceptance of U.S. and foreign import permits. When applying for a U.S. import permit, you must provide sufficient information for us to find that your proposed activity meets all of the following criteria:

| Criteria for an import permit for an Appendix-I specimen | Section |
| --- | --- |
| (1) The proposed import would be for purposes that are not detrimental to the survival of the species. | 23.61 |
| (2) The specimen will not be used for primarily commercial purposes. | 23.62 |
| (3) The recipients are suitably equipped to house and care for any live wildlife or plant to be imported. | 23.65 |
| (4) The scientific name of the species is the standard nomenclature in the CITES Appendices or the references adopted by the CoP. | 23.23 |

(d) *U.S. standard conditions.* You must meet all of the provisions on use after import in [§ 23.55](/on/2024-09-20/title-50/section-23.55) and the standard conditions in [§ 23.56](/on/2024-09-20/title-50/section-23.56).

(e) *Prior issuance of an import permit.* For Appendix-I specimens, the Management Authority of the exporting country may:

(1) Issue an export permit for live or dead specimens or a re-export certificate for live specimens only after the Management Authority of the importing country has either issued an import permit or confirmed in writing that an import permit will be issued.

(2) Accept oral confirmation from the Management Authority of the importing country that an import permit will be issued in an emergency situation where the life or health of the specimen is threatened and no means of written communication is possible.

(3) Issue a re-export certificate for a dead specimen without confirmation that the import permit has been issued.
Case 16-25995 Doc 12 Filed 08/17/16 Entered 08/18/16 12:56:44 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 555 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 555

   To ensure that consumer credit reports include information on any 
           overdue child support obligations of the consumer.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 21, 1993

 Ms. Woolsey introduced the following bill; which was referred jointly 
 to the Committees on Banking, Finance and Urban Affairs and Ways and 
                                 Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To ensure that consumer credit reports include information on any 
           overdue child support obligations of the consumer.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INCLUSION IN CONSUMER CREDIT REPORTS OF INFORMATION ON 
              OVERDUE CHILD SUPPORT OBLIGATIONS OF THE CONSUMER.

    (a) Consumer Reporting Agencies Required To Include in Consumer 
Credit Reports Information on Overdue Child Support Obligations of the 
Consumer.--Section 604 of the Consumer Credit Protection Act (15 U.S.C. 
1681b) is amended--
            (1) in the caption for such section, by adding at the end 
        the following: ``; reporting of overdue child support 
        obligations'';
            (2) by inserting ``(a)'' before ``A consumer''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(b) A consumer reporting agency shall include in any consumer 
report information (if any) provided by a State child support agency or 
verified by another government entity on the failure of the consumer to 
pay overdue support (as defined in section 466(e) of the Social 
Security Act).''.
    (b) Provision to Consumer Reporting Agencies of Information on 
Overdue Child Support Obligations of Absent Parents.--Section 466(a)(7) 
of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 666(a)(7)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``will'' and inserting ``shall'';
            (2) by striking ``upon the request of such agency'';
            (3) by striking ``, and (C)'' and all that follows through 
        ``State''.
            (4) by striking ``minor'' from 466(e) and deleting ``at the 
        option'' and all that follows through the word ``section.''
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall take 
effect on the 1st day of the 1st calendar quarter that begins on or 
after the date of the enactment of this Act.

                                 <all>
```
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-14-00114-CR

IN RE Manuel ALCOSER Jr.

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Delivered and Filed: March 5, 2014

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

On February 8, 2014, relator Manuel Alcoser Jr. filed a pro se petition for writ of 

mandamus asking this court to direct the district court clerk to respond to a number of motions, 

which Alcoser contends were filed in his underlying criminal proceeding over the last several 

weeks. However, this court does not have jurisdiction to grant the requested relief. By statute, this 

court has the authority to issue a writ of mandamus against “a judge of a district or county court in 

the court of appeals district” and other writs as necessary to enforce appellate jurisdiction. See

TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.221(a)-(b) (West 2004). We conclude the writ in this instance is not 

necessary to enforce jurisdiction. Accordingly, we dismiss relator’s petition for writ of mandamus 

for lack of jurisdiction.

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2011CR5943, styled The State of Texas v. Manuel Alcoser Jr., pending in 

the 437th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Lori I. Valenzuela presiding.

 
04-14-00114-CR

Even if we were to construe Alcoser’s petition as requesting mandamus relief against a 

proper respondent, however, a relator has the burden of providing this court with a record sufficient 

to establish a right to mandamus relief including, in a case such as this, that the motions at issue 

were properly filed, the trial court was made aware of the pending motions and the motions have

awaited disposition for an unreasonable period of time. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3(k)(1)(A), 52.7(a) 

(“Relator must file with the petition [ ] a certified or sworn copy of every document that is material 

to the relator’s claim for relief and that was filed in any underlying proceeding”); In re Mendoza, 

131 S.W.3d 167, 167-68 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2004, orig. proceeding). Alcoser has not 

provided this court with a record sufficient to establish his claim for relief. See In re Gallardo, 269 

S.W.3d 643, 645 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2008, orig. proceeding).

Additionally, relator requested leave to file the petition for writ of mandamus. No leave is 

required to file a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. TEX.R. APP. P. 52. Therefore, relator’s 

request for leave to file is denied as moot.

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH

- 2 -
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 99.2

                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Luigino's, Inc.
(the "Company") for the period ended October 6, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on November 18, 2002 (the "Periodic Report"),
I, Ronald O. Bubar, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1.       The Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of
                  sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
                  (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

         2.       The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly
                  presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
                  and results of operations of the Company.




By: /s/ Ronald O. Bubar
    ----------------------------


Ronald O. Bubar
Chief Executive Officer
Luigino's, Inc.

November 18, 2002
EXHIBIT 32.2


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Medical  Makeover  Corporation  of
America (the  "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending  September 30, 2005
as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the
"Periodic Report"), I, Stephen H Durland, Acting Chief Accounting Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18.U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1. The Periodic  Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.



    /s/    Stephen H Durland
    --------------------------------
    Stephen H Durland
    Acting Chief Accounting Officer
    January 26, 2006







--------------------
This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and  shall not be deemed  filed by the  Company  for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section 906,  has been  provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its
staff upon request.
****

National Aeronautics and Space Administration       NASA History Office
****

NEXT

Updated November 14, 2001    Roger D. Launius, NASA Chief HistorianSteve Garber, NASA History Web Curator    Jennifer Davis, NASA History Intern     For further information E-mail histinfo@hq.nasa.gov
**Read more of the September Dispatch**
    - A Cool Idea for Connecting with the Hispanic Community in Woodland, California
    - Applying Psychology to Optimize Officer Wellbeing
    - National Faith & Blue Weekend: Building Bridges to Community Collaboration
    - From Concept to Cornerstone: Supporting Your Training Needs 
    - University of Cincinnati Police Division Wins the 2022 Herman Goldstein Award
Case 16-81998 Doc 13 Filed 09/12/16 Entered 09/13/16 15:51:55 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1