55804 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 185 / Monday, September 25, 2006 / Notices 

1The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 

CFR 207.2(f)). 

1The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 

CFR 207.2(f)). 

2Chairman Daniel R. Pearson and Commissioners 

Jennifer A. Hillman and Deanna Tanner Okun 

dissented, determining that an industry in the 

United States is threatened with material injury by 

reason of subject imports from China, but is neither 

materially injured nor threatened with material 

injury by reason of subject imports from India and 

Indonesia. 

comments. In addition, you must 

present a rationale for withholding this 

information. This rationale must 

demonstrate that disclosure would 

constitute a clearly unwarranted 

invasion of privacy. Unsupported 

assertions will not meet this burden. In 

the absence of exceptional, 

documentable circumstances, this 

information will be released. We will 

always make submissions from 

organizations or businesses, and from 

individuals identifying themselves as 

representatives or officials of 

organizations or businesses, available 

for public inspection in their entirety. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kib 

Jacobson, telephone (801) 524–3753; 

faxogram (801) 524–3826; e-mail at: 

kjacobson@uc.usbr.gov. 

Dated: August 23, 2006. 

Darryl Beckmann, 

Deputy Regional Director—UC Region, 

Bureau of Reclamation. 

[FR Doc. 06–8160 Filed 9–22–06; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–MN–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation Nos. 731–TA–703 and 705 

(Second Review)] 

Furfuryl Alcohol From China and 

Thailand 

Determinations 

On the basis of the record 1 developed 

in the subject five-year reviews, the 

United States International Trade 

Commission (Commission) determines, 

pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff 

Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)) (the 

Act), that revocation of the antidumping 

duty orders on furfuryl alcohol from 

China and Thailand would be likely to 

lead to continuation or recurrence of 

material injury to an industry in the 

United States within a reasonably 

foreseeable time. 

Background 

The Commission instituted these 

reviews on April 3, 2006 (71 FR 16587) 

and determined on July 7, 2006 that it 

would conduct expedited reviews (71 

FR 41469, July 21, 2006). Notice of the 

scheduling of the Commission’s reviews 

was given by posting copies of the 

notice in the Office of the Secretary, 

U.S. International Trade Commission, 

Washington, DC, and by publishing the 

notice in the Federal Register on July 

21, 2006 (71 FR 41469). 

The Commission transmitted its 

determinations in these reviews to the 

Secretary of Commerce on September 

15, 2006. The views of the Commission 

are contained in USITC Publication 

3885 (September 2006), entitled 

Furfuryl Alcohol from China and 

Thailand: Investigation Nos. 731–TA–

703 and 705 (Second Review). 

Issued: September 20, 2006. 

By order of the Commission. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 06–8170 Filed 9–22–06; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation Nos. 701–TA–442–443 and 

731–TA–1095–1097 (Final)] 

Certain Lined Paper School Supplies 

From China, India, and Indonesia 

Determination 

On the basis of the record 1 developed 

in the subject investigations, the United 

States International Trade Commission 

(Commission) determines, pursuant to 

sections 705(b) and 735(b) of the Tariff 

Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1671d(b) and 

1673d(b)) (the Act), that an industry in 

the United States is materially injured 

by reason of imports from India and 

Indonesia of certain lined paper school 

supplies that have been found by the 

Department of Commerce (Commerce) 

to be subsidized by the Governments of 

India and Indonesia, and by reason of 

imports from China, India, and 

Indonesia of certain lined paper school 

supplies that have been found by 

Commerce to be sold in the United 

States at less than fair value (LTFV).2

The Commission finds that critical 

circumstances do not exist with respect 

to subject imports from China and 

Indonesia. 

Background 

The Commission instituted these 

investigations effective September 9, 

2005, following receipt of a petition 

filed with the Commission and 

Commerce by MeadWestvaco Corp., 

Dayton, OH; Norcom, Inc., Norcross, 

GA; and Top Flight, Inc., Chattanooga, 

TN (collectively, the Association of 

American School Paper Suppliers). The 

final phase of the investigations was 

scheduled by the Commission following 

notification of a preliminary 

determination by Commerce that 

imports of certain lined paper school 

supplies from Indonesia were being 

subsidized within the meaning of 

section 703(b) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 

1671b(b)). Notice of the scheduling of 

the final phase of the Commission’s 

investigations and of a public hearing to 

be held in connection therewith was 

given by posting copies of the notice in 

the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 

Washington, DC, and by publishing the 

notice in the Federal Register of April 

7, 2006 (71 FR 17914). On May 30, 2006, 

the Commission published notice of a 

revised schedule and public hearing 

date (71 FR 30694). The hearing was 

held in Washington, DC, on July 25, 

2006, and all persons who requested the 

opportunity were permitted to appear in 

person or by counsel. 

The Commission transmitted its 

determinations in these investigations to 

the Secretary of Commerce on 

September 21, 2006. The views of the 

Commission are contained in USITC 

Publication 3884 (September 2006), 

entitled Certain Lined Paper School 

Supplies From China, India, and 

Indonesia: Investigation Nos. 701–TA–

442–443 and 731–TA–1095–1097 

(Final). 

Issued: September 20, 2006. 

By order of the Commission. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 06–8171 Filed 9–22–06; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

[OMB Number 1105–0080] 

Civil Division; Agency Information 

Collection Activities: Proposed 

Collection; Comments Requested 

ACTION: 30-Day Notice of Information 

Collection Under Review: Annuity 

Broker Qualification Declaration Form. 

The Department of Justice (DOJ), Civil 

Division, has submitted the following 

information collection request to the 

Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB) for review and approval in 

accordance with the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995. The proposed 

information collection is published to 

obtain comments from the public and 

affected agencies. This proposed 

information collection was previously 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 185 / Monday, September 25, 2006 / Notices 55805 

published in the Federal Register 

Volume 71, Number 150, page 44313–

44314 on August 4, 2006, allowing for 

a 60-day comment period. 

The purpose of this notice is to allow 

for an additional 30 days for public 

comment until October 25, 2006. This 

process is conducted in accordance with 

5 CFR 1320.10. 

Written comments and/or suggestions 

regarding the items contained in this 

notice, especially the estimated public 

burden and associated response time, 

should be directed to the Office of 

Management and Budget, Office of 

Information and Regulatory Affairs, 

Attention Department of Justice Desk 

Officer, Washington, DC 20503. 

Additionally, comments may be 

submitted to OMB via facsimile to (202) 

395–5806. Written comments and 

suggestions from the public and affected 

agencies concerning the proposed 

collection of information are 

encouraged. Your comments should 

address one or more of the following 

four points: 

—Evaluate whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary 

for the proper performance of the 

functions of the agency, including 

whether the information will have 

practical utility; 

—Evaluate the accuracy of the agencies 

estimate of the burden of the 

proposed collection of information, 

including the validity of the 

methodology and assumptions used; 

—Enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and 

—Minimize the burden of the collection 

of information on those who are to 

respond, including through the use of 

appropriate automated, electronic, 

mechanical, or other technological 

collection techniques or other forms 

of information technology, e.g., 

permitting electronic submission of 

responses. 

Overview of This Information 

Collection 

(1) Type of Information Collection: 

Extension, without change, of a 

currently approved collection. 

(2) Title of the Form/Collection: 

Annuity Broker Qualification 

Declaration Form. 

(3) Agency form number, if any, and 

the applicable component of the 

Department sponsoring the collection: 

The Civil Division, United States 

Department of Justice is sponsoring the 

collection. 

(4) Affected public who will be asked 

or required to respond, as well as a brief 

abstract: Primary: Individuals. This 

declaration is to be submitted annually 

to determine whether a broker meets the 

qualifications to be listed as an annuity 

broker pursuant to Section 11015(b) of 

Public Law 107–273. 

(5) An estimate of the total number of 

respondents and the amount of time 

estimated for an average respondent to 

respond: It is estimated that 400 

respondents will complete the form 

annually within approximately 1 hour. 

(6) An estimate of the total public 

burden (in hours) associated with the 

collection: There are an estimated 400 

total annual burden hours associated 

with this collection. 

If additional information is required 

contact: Lynn Bryant, Department 

Clearance Officer, United States 

Department of Justice, Justice 

Management Division, Policy and 

Planning Staff, Patrick Henry Building, 

Suite 1600, 601 D Street, NW., 

Washington, DC 20530. 

Dated: September 19, 2006. 

Lynn Bryant, 

Department Clearance Officer, Department of 

Justice. 

[FR Doc. 06–8130 Filed 9–22–06; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–12–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

[OMB Number 1122–0006] 

Office on Violence Against Women; 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities: Revision of a Currently 

Approved Collection 

ACTION: 60-Day Notice of Information 

Collection Under Review: Semi-Annual 

Progress Report for the Grants to 

Encourage Arrest Policies and 

Enforcement of Protection Orders 

Program. 

The Department of Justice, Office on 

Violence Against Women (OVW) has 

submitted the following information 

collection request to the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) for 

review and approval in accordance with 

the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. 

Comments are encouraged and will be 

accepted for ‘‘sixty days’’ until 

November 24, 2006. This process is 

conducted in accordance with 5 CFR 

1320.10. 

Written comments and/or suggestions 

regarding the items contained in this 

notice, especially the estimated public 

burden and associated response time, 

should be directed to the Office of 

Management and Budget, Office of 

Information and Regulatory Affairs, 

Attention Department of Justice Desk 

Officer, Washington, DC 20503. 

Additionally, comments may be 

submitted to OMB via facsimile to (202) 

395–5806. 

Written comments and suggestions 

from the public and affected agencies 

concerning the proposed collection of 

information are encouraged. Your 

comments should address one or more 

of the following four points: 

(1) Evaluate whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary 

for the proper performance of the 

functions of the agency, including 

whether the information will have 

practical utility; 

(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the 

agency’s estimate of the burden of the 

proposed collection of information, 

including the validity of the 

methodology and assumptions used; 

(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and 

(4) Minimize the burden of the 

collection of information on those who 

are to respond, including through the 

use of appropriate automated, 

electronic, mechanical, or other 

technological collection techniques or 

other forms of information technology, 

e.g., permitting electronic submission of 

responses. 

Overview of This Information 

Collection 

(1) Type of Information Collection: 

Revision of a currently approved 

collection 

(2) Title of the Form/Collection: SemiAnnual Progress Report for Grants to 

Encourage Arrest Policies and 

Enforcement of Protection Orders 

Program 

(3) Agency form number, if any, and 

the applicable component of the 

Department of Justice sponsoring the 

collection: Form Number: 1122–0006. 

U.S. Department of Justice, Office on 

Violence Against Women 

(4) Affected public who will be asked 

or required to respond, as well as a brief 

abstract: The affected public includes 

the approximately 200 grantees of the 

Grants to Encourage Arrest Policies and 

Enforcement of Protection Orders 

Program (Arrest Program) whose 

eligibility is determined by statute. The 

Arrest Program was authorized through 

the Violence Against Women Act 

(VAWA) and reauthorized and amended 

by the Violence Against Women Act of 

2000 (VAWA 2000) and by the Violence 

Against Women Act of 2005 (VAWA 

2005). The Arrest Program promotes 

mandatory or pro-arrest policies and 

encourages jurisdictions to treat 

domestic violence and sexual assault as 

a serious crime, establish coordinated 

community responses and facilitate the 

enforcement of protection orders. By 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES