alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EUR-Lex - 12004V/AFI/DCL/18 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V/AFI/DCL/18

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - FINAL ACT - A.Declarations concerning provisions of the Constitution - 18.Declaration on Article III-213 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0461 - 0461 *

18. Declaration on Article III-213

The Conference confirms that the policies described in Article III-213 fall essentially within the competence of the Member States. Measures to provide encouragement and promote coordination to be taken at Union level in accordance with this Article shall be of a complementary nature. They shall serve to strengthen cooperation between Member States and not to harmonise national systems. The guarantees and practices existing in each Member State as regards the responsibility of the social partners will not be affected.

This Declaration is without prejudice to the provisions of the Constitution conferring competence on the Union, including in social matters.

--------------------------------------------------
# EUR-Lex - 12004V395 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V395

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART III — THE POLICIES AND FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - TITLE VI — THE FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - CHAPTER I — PROVISIONS GOVERNING THE INSTITUTIONS - Section 4 — Provisions common to Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies - Article III-395 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0170 - 0170 *

Article III-395

1. Where, pursuant to the Constitution, the Council acts on a proposal from the Commission, it may amend that proposal only by acting unanimously, except in the cases referred to in Articles I-55, I-56, III-396(10) and (13), III-404 and III-405(2).

2. As long as the Council has not acted, the Commission may alter its proposal at any time during the procedures leading to the adoption of a Union act.

--------------------------------------------------
**Exhibit
      32.1**











**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Annual Report of T Bay Holdings, Inc. a Nevada corporation
      (the “Company”), on Form 10-KSB for the annual period ending March 31, 2006 as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Xiaofeng
      Li, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906
      of
      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my
      knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.











Date:July 13,
              2006
            By:
                /s/ Xiaofeng LiXiaofeng LiChief Executive Officer
F:' 

I • 

?0!6.n^r -9 FH q: q? 

BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION . C > * LA 

Inthe Matter of ) 

) MUR6920 

American Conservative Union; Now or ) 

I Never PAC and James C. Thomas in his ) 

L official capacity as treasurer; Unicnown .) 

A Respondent ) 

CERTIFICATION 

I, Shelley E. Garr, recording secretary of the Federal Election Commission executive 

session, do hereby certify that on December 06,2016, the Commission took the following 

actions in the above-captioned matter: 

1. Failed by a vote of 3-3 to: 

a. Find reason to believe that American Conservative Union violated 52 U.S.C. 

§30122. 

b. Find reason to believe that Unknown Respondent violated 52 U.S.C. § 30122. 

c. Take no action at this time as to Now or Never PAC and James C. Thomas III in 

his official capacity as treasurer. 

d. Approve the Factual and Legal Analysis as recommended in the First General 

Counsel's Report daited Januaiy 20', 2016 and as edited by Cdmmissionef 

Goodman's Office on November 10,2016 at 11:16 P.M. 

e. Approve the use of compulsory process as necessary. 

f. Approve the appropriate letters. 

Commissioners Goodman, Hunter, and Petersen voted affirmatively for the motion. 

Commissioners Ravel, Walther, and Weintraub dissented. 
Federal Election Commission Page 2 

Certification for MUR 6920 

December 6,2016 

2. Failed by'a vote of 3 0 to: 

a. Find reason to believe that ACU violated 52 U.S.C. § 30122. 

b. Find reason to believe that Unknown Respondents violated 52 U.S.C. § 30122. 

c. Take no action at this time as to Now or Never PAC and James C. Thomas III in 

his official capacity as treasurer. 

d. Approve the use of compulsory process as necessary. 

Commissioners Ravel, Walther, and Weintraub voted affirmatively for the motion. 

Commissioners Goodman, Hunter, and Petersen abstained. 

Attest: 

Date Shelley E. ' 

Deputy Secretary of the Commission
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL,

Petitioner

v.

MICHAEL J. CASALE, JR.

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 2435 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

No. 204 DB 2017

Attorney Registrati o n No. 23820

(Lycoming County)

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 30 th day of August , 2018, upon consideration of the

Recommendation of the Three

- Member Panel of the Disciplinary Board, the Joint

Petition in Support of Discipline on Consent is granted, and Michael J. Casale, Jr.

, is

suspended on consent from the Bar of this Commonwealth for a period of five years

, retroactive to January 4, 2018, with one year to be served.

The remaining suspension of four years is stayed

, and he is placed on probation for

a period of four years, subject to the following conditions:

1. Respondent shall abide by the terms of his criminal probation and promptly

report to the Office of Disciplinary Counsel any parole violation or revocation;

2. R evocation of Respondent’s criminal probation will result in the immediate

imposition of the remainder of the suspension from the practice of law; and

3. Respondent is to promptly report the imposition of discipline to all other

federal and state jurisdictions to which he is admitted.It is further ordered that Respondent shall comply with all the provisions of

Pa.R.D.E. 217 and pay the costs incurred by the Disciplinary Board in the investigation

and prosecution of this matter.
```

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.ss.1350)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  ss.1350),
the  undersigned,  George J. Longo,  the Chief Financial  Officer of The Quigley
Corporation,  a Nevada corporation (the "Company"),  does hereby certify, to his
knowledge, that:

The Annual  Report on Form 10-K for the quarter  ended  December 31, 2002 of the
Company (the "Report") fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, and the information  contained in
the Report fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial  condition
and results of operations of the Company.

                                                 /s/  George J. Longo
                                                 ------------------------------
                                                 George J. Longo
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
                                                 March 17, 2003
```
#### § 14.161 Primary enclosures.

(a) Except as provided in [§ 14.106(j)](/on/2024-09-20/title-50/section-14.106#p-14.106(j)), ventilation openings must be located on at least two walls of a primary enclosure. When the required ventilation openings are located on two opposite walls of the primary enclosure, these ventilation openings shall comprise at least 16 percent of the total surface area of each ventilated wall. When openings are located on all four walls of the enclosure, the openings shall comprise at least 8 percent of the total surface area of each wall. At least one-third of the minimum area required for ventilation shall be located on the lower one-half of the enclosure, and at least one-third of the total minimum area required for ventilation shall be located on the upper one-half of the enclosure.

(b) No more than one terrestrial mammal (other than rodents) shall be transported in a primary enclosure. However, a mother and her nursing young may be shipped in the same primary enclosure if the shipment complies with the provisions of [§ 14.105(b)](/on/2024-09-20/title-50/section-14.105#p-14.105(b)).

(c) More than one rodent may be transported in the same primary enclosure if they are members of the same species and are maintained in compatible groups. Rodents that are incompatible shall be transported in individual primary enclosures that are stored and transported so they are visually separated. A female with young being transported for medical reasons shall not be placed in a primary enclosure with other animals. The following chart specifies maximum densities minimum space for transporting rodents that fall within the specified weight limitations. Max. No. refers to maximum number per primary enclosure; Space/animal refers to minimum area of floor space per animals. Rodents weighing more than 5,000 grams shall be transported in individual enclosures.

Density Guidelines for Rodents

| | Max. No. | Space/Animal | | Ht. of Box | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| cm2 | in2 | cm | in |
| wt. in grams of rodent: | | | | | |
| 220 or less | 20 | 194 | 30 | 15 | 6 |
| 220-450 | 12 | 388 | 60 | 20 | 8 |
| 450-1000 | 6 | 770 | 120 | 25 | 10 |
| 1,000-5,000 | 2 | 2,310 | 360 | 30 | 12 |

(d) A primary enclosure used to transport terrestrial mammals shall be large enough to ensure that each animal has sufficient space to turn around freely in a normal manner. The height of the primary enclosure shall provide adequate space for the animal to stand upright in a normal posture with space above its head. The length of the primary enclosure shall be great enough to enable the animal to lie in a full prone position.
REGISTRATION 19713-500 Vol. 2
§ 81.8 Payments. The payment of the Federal share of costs incurred in the conduct of activities included under a Project Agreement shall be in accordance with Treasury Circular 1075. ( a ) Federal payments under the Act shall not exceed 75 percent of the program costs as stated in the agreement; except, the Federal share may be increased to 90 percent when two or more States having a common interest in one or more endangered or threatened species, the conservation of which may be enhanced by cooperation of such States, enter jointly into an agreement with the Secretary.
( b ) The State share of program costs may be in the form of cash or in-kind contributions, including real property, subject to standards established by the Secretary as provided in Office of Management and Budget Circular A-102.
( c ) Payments under the Endangered Species Act, including such preliminary costs and expenses as may be incurred in connection with projects, shall not be made unless all documents that may be necessary or required in the administration of this Act shall have first been submitted to and approved by the Secretary. Payments shall be made for expenditures reported and certified by the State agencies. Payments shall be made only to the State office or official designated by the State agency and authorized under the laws of the State to receive public funds of the State.
( d ) Vouchers and forms provided by the Secretary and certified as therein prescribed, showing amounts expended and the amount of Federal Aid funds claimed to be due on account thereof, shall be submitted to the Secretary by the State agency.
[40 FR 47509, Oct. 9, 1975, as amended at 44 FR 31581, May 31, 1979; 49 FR 30074, July 26, 1984]
Exhibit 35.2

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

Chase Bank USA, National Association

First USA Credit Card Master Trust

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Chase Bank USA, National Association (the Bank), as Servicer, pursuant to the Third Amended and Restated Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as
of December 19, 2007 (as amended and supplemented from time to time, the Agreement) between the Bank, as transferor and servicer (in such capacity, the Servicer) and BNY Mellon Trust of Delaware, as trustee, does hereby
certify that:



| | 1. | The Bank is, as of the date hereof, the Servicer under the Agreement.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | A review of the Servicers activities during the calendar year ended December 31, 2010 (the Reporting Period) and of its performance under the
Agreement has been made under my supervision.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 3. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the
Reporting Period.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this certificate this 29th day of March 2011.



CHASE BANK USA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as ServicerBy:

/s/ Keith W. SchuckName:

Keith W. SchuckTitle:

President
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 01236**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket** **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  01236\01236_Certification Statement.pdf Plant certification statement x 01236\01236_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

01236\01236_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 01236\01236_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 01236\01236_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file x 01236\01236_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file x 01236\01236_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file x 01236\01236_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file x 01236\01236_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file x 01236\Follow up\01236_Follow up-Response.pdf Draft Questions for Follow Up x 01236\Follow up\AEP ML Updated Part C Table C-23 U1.xls Draft Questions for Follow Up x 01236\Follow up\AEP ML Updated Part C Table C-23 U2.xls Draft Questions for Follow Up x 01236\Follow up\AEP ML Updated Part D Table D-13.xls Draft Questions for Follow Up x 01236\Follow up\AEP ML WWT-1 updated.ppt Draft Questions for Follow Up x 01236\Follow up\EPA ML ICR review ques.doc Draft Questions for Follow Up x 01236\Follow up\EPA_Mitchell_FollowUp.pdf Draft Questions for Follow Up

01236\Supporting Documentation\01236_AEP ELGs ICR submittal letter 10-13-10.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 01236\Supporting Documentation\AEP ML 01236 A5-2 Aerial MAP-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 01236\Supporting Documentation\AEP ML 01236 A5-2 Aerial MAP-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 01236\Supporting Documentation\AEP ML 01236 A5-3 Water Balance WB-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

01236\Supporting Documentation\AEP ML 01236 D2-3 EPA Mitchell SER - Appendices.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 01236\Supporting Documentation\AEP ML 01236 D2-3 EPA Mitchell SER final report.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 01236\Supporting Documentation\AEP ML 01236 D2-3 FGD Trmt Option Eval CBI.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 01236\Supporting Documentation\AEP ML 01236 D2-4 CH2MHill Treatability Study Attachment CBI.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 01236\Supporting Documentation\AEP ML 01236 D3-1 Diagram D-1(POND-1).pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 01236\Supporting Documentation\AEP ML 01236 D3-1 Diagram D-1(POND-2).pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 01236\Supporting Documentation\AEP ML 01236 D3-1 Diagram WWT-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 01236\Supporting Documentation\AEP ML 01236 D5-10 Bid Proposal Exhibit B1 Attachment CBI.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 01236\Supporting Documentation\AEP ML 01236 D5-10 Bid Proposal Exhibit B2 Attachment CBI.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in theSteam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, July 13, 2015. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, July 13, 2015 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A15I0178. NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION v. PEARL MCCREA.
Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 2013CV02704
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                       <C>            
<PERIOD-TYPE>             YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          52,550
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,029
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               274,530
<PP&E>                                         592,569
<DEPRECIATION>                               (320,703)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,149,662
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          156,879
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       126,206
<OTHER-SE>                                     850,977
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   977,183
<SALES>                                        931,747
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               931,747
<CGS>                                          389,707
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,155,189
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,378
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (627,527)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (627,527)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.05)
        

</TABLE>
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 56

To amend the Shipping Act of 1984 to provide for equitable treatment

of United States ocean freight forwarders by ocean carrier conferences.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 5, 1993

Mrs. BENTLEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries

A BILL

To amend the Shipping Act of 1984 to provide for equitable

treatment of United States ocean freight forwarders by

ocean carrier conferences.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. INDEPENDENT ACTION.

4 Section 5(b) of the Shipping Act of 1984 (46 U.S.C.

5 App. 1704(b)) is amended by striking paragraph (8) and

6 inserting the following:

7 ‘‘(8) provide that—

8 ‘‘(A) any member of the conference may

9 take independent action on any rate, service

10 item, or level of ocean freight forwarder com-
2

•HR 56 IH

1 pensation required to be filed in a tariff under

2 section 8(a) upon not more than 10 calendar

3 days notice to the conference; and

4 ‘‘(B) the conference will include the new

5 rate, service item, or level of ocean freight for6 warder compensation in its tariff for use by

7 that member, effective no later than 10 cal8 endar days after receipt of the notice, and by

9 any other member that notifies the conference

10 that it elects to adopt the independent rate,

11 service item, or level of ocean freight forwarder

12 compensation on or after its effective date, in

13 lieu of the existing conference tariff provision

14 for that rate, service item, or level of ocean

15 freight forwarder compensation;’’.

16 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON DENYING COMPENSATION.

17 Section 10(c) of the Shipping Act of 1984 (46 U.S.C.

18 App. 1709(c)), is amended by striking paragraph (5) and

19 inserting the following:

20 ‘‘(5) deny in the export foreign commerce of the

21 United States compensation to an ocean freight for22 warder, or limit that compensation to less than 1.25

23 percent of the aggregate of all of the rates and

24 charges applicable under the tariff assessed against
3

•HR 56 IH

1 the cargo on which the forwarding services are pro2 vided; or’’.

Æ
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  About Crop I... 
-  National Fac... 
-  Kentucky State Profile - 2023 

## About Crop Insurance

        -  Managing Your Farm Risk            -  Insurance Plans 
          -  Insurance Cycle              -  Application Process 
            -  Coverage and Billing 
            -  Claims Process 
            -  Program Changes 
          -  Obligations and Expectations 
          -  Resources 
        -  Beginning or Veteran Farmers 
        -  Urban Farmers 
        -  Highlighted Initiatives and Plans            -  Beginners Guide to Crop Insurance 
          -  Conservation 
          -  Controlled Environment 
          -  Cover Crops 
          -  Double Cropping 
          -  Emergency and Natural Disaster Relief 
          -  Fire Insurance Protection – Smoke Index 
          -  Hemp 
          -  Hurricane Insurance Protection - Wind Index 
          -  Nursery              -  Nursery Value Select 
          -  Organic Crops              -  Contract Price Addendum Eligibility by Commodity 
            -  Organic Premium Price Elections Available by Commodity 
            -  Steps to Success 
          -  Policyholder Bill of Rights 
          -  Prevented Planting 
          -  Shellfish 
          -  Specialty Crops              -  2023 Expansions of Specialty Crops Programs 
            -  2022 Expansion of Specialty Crops Programs 
            -  2021 Expansions of Specialty Crops Programs 
            -  2020 Expansions of Specialty Crops Programs 
            -  2019 Expansions of Specialty Crops Programs 
          -  Whole-Farm Revenue Protection 
        -  Fact Sheets 
        -  Frequently Asked Questions 
        -  Farm Bill 
        -  Outreach and Education            -  Partnership Projects 
          -  Pilot Projects 
          -  Success Stories and Program Impact 
          -  Past Webinars 

# Kentucky State Profile - 2023

migrationWed, 05/08/2024 - 03:51

View PDF

Download 2023 Kentucky State Profile (PDF)

All multi-peril crop insurance, including Catastrophic Risk Protection policies, are available from private crop insurance agents. A list of insurance agents is available online using the RMA Agent Locator.