alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 5173 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 5173

  To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for the 
treatment of critical access hospital services furnished by a critical 
           access hospital located in a noncontiguous State.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 25, 2024

  Mr. Sullivan (for himself and Mr. Schatz) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for the 
treatment of critical access hospital services furnished by a critical 
           access hospital located in a noncontiguous State.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Comprehensive Reimbursement 
Initiative Targeting Investment and Care in rural Locations'' or the 
``CRITICAL Act''.

SEC. 2. TREATMENT OF CRITICAL ACCESS HOSPITALS LOCATED IN A 
              NONCONTIGUOUS STATE.

    (a) Inpatient Critical Access Hospital Services.--Section 1814(l) 
of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395f(l)) is amended by inserting 
``(or, in the case of inpatient critical access hospital services 
furnished on or after January 1, 2025, by a critical access hospital 
that is located in a noncontiguous State, 105 percent)'' after ``101 
percent''.
    (b) Outpatient Critical Access Hospital Services.--Section 
1834(g)(1) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395m(g)(1)) is 
amended by inserting ``(or, in the case of outpatient critical access 
hospital services furnished on or after January 1, 2025, by a critical 
access hospital that is located in a noncontiguous State, 105 
percent)'' after ``101 percent''.
    (c) Ambulance Services.--Section 1834(l)(8) of the Social Security 
Act (42 U.S.C. 1395m(l)(8)) is amended by inserting ``(or, in the case 
of ambulance services furnished on or after January 1, 2025, by a 
critical access hospital that is located in a noncontiguous State or by 
an entity that is owned and operated by a critical access hospital that 
is located in a noncontiguous State, 105 percent)'' after ``101 
percent''.
    (d) Skilled Nursing Facility Services.--Section 1883(a)(3) of the 
Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395tt(a)(3)) is amended by inserting 
``(or, in the case of covered skilled nursing facility services 
furnished on or after January 1, 2025, under an agreement under this 
section by a critical access hospital that is located in a 
noncontiguous State, 105 percent)'' after ``101 percent''.
                                 <all>
```
# EUR-Lex - 12004V380 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V380

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART III — THE POLICIES AND FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - TITLE VI — THE FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - CHAPTER I — PROVISIONS GOVERNING THE INSTITUTIONS - Section 1 — The institutions - Subsection 5 — The Court of Justice of the European Union - Article III-380 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0163 - 0163 *

Article III-380

The judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union shall be enforceable under the conditions laid down in Article III-401.

--------------------------------------------------
# EUR-Lex - 12005SA013 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12005SA013

**Act concerning the conditions of accession of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania and the adjustments to the Treaties on which the European Union is founded - PART TWO:ADJUSTMENTS TO THE TREATIES - TITLE I:INSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS - Article 13 **

*
Official Journal L 157 , 21/06/2005 P. 0208 - 0208 *

Article 13

The third paragraph of Article 263 of the EC Treaty on the composition of the Committee of the Regions shall be replaced by the following:

"The number of members of the Committee shall be as follows:

Belgium | 12 |

Bulgaria | 12 |

Czech Republic | 12 |

Denmark | 9 |

Germany | 24 |

Estonia | 7 |

Greece | 12 |

Spain | 21 |

France | 24 |

Ireland | 9 |

Italy | 24 |

Cyprus | 6 |

Latvia | 7 |

Lithuania | 9 |

Luxembourg | 6 |

Hungary | 12 |

Malta | 5 |

Netherlands | 12 |

Austria | 12 |

Poland | 21 |

Portugal | 12 |

Romania | 15 |

Slovenia | 7 |

Slovakia | 9 |

Finland | 9 |

Sweden | 12 |

United Kingdom | 24." |

--------------------------------------------------
#### § 665.247 At-sea observer coverage.

All fishing vessels subject to §§ 665.240 though 665.252 and subpart A of this part must carry an observer when requested to do so by the Regional Administrator.
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20463

BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

In the Matter of )

) MUR 7465

Freedom Vote, Inc. )

)

SUPPLEMENTAL STATEMENT OF REASONS OF 

COMMISSIONER SEAN J. COOKSEY

In addition to the Statement of Reasons I joined in this matter with Chairman Dickerson 

and Commissioner Trainor,

1

I have previously explained my views on the statute of limitations 

and equitable remedies in a Supplemental Statement of Reasons in MURs 6917 & 6929 (Scott 

Walker, et al.) and MURs 6955 & 6983 (John R. Kasich, et al.).

2

As detailed in that statement, I believe that mandating retrospective reporting and 

disclosure is a penalty subject to 18 U.S.C. § 2462’s limitations period, and that even if mandatory 

disclosure were not a penalty, any reporting requirement would still be barred under the 

concurrent-remedies doctrine. I applied the same reasoning to this matter and accordingly voted 

to dismiss the majority of the allegations pursuant to the expiration of the statute of limitations.3

As to the remaining conduct just outside of the five-year limitations period, I concluded 

that dismissal as a matter of prosecutorial discretion was appropriate considering the limited value 

of further enforcement relative to the costs to the agency and the low likelihood of success.4

______________________________ March 9, 2022

Sean J. Cooksey Date

Commissioner

1 Statement of Reasons of Chairman Dickerson and Commissioners Cooksey and Trainor (March 7, 2022), 

MUR 7465 (Freedom Vote, Inc.).

2 Supplemental Statement of Reasons of Commissioner Sean J. Cooksey (April 29, 2021), MURs 6917 & 6929 

(Scott Walker, et al.) and MURs 6955 & 6983 (John R. Kasich, et al.).

3 Certification (Nov. 9, 2021), MUR 7465 (Freedom Vote, Inc.).

4 Heckler v. Chaney, 470 U.S. 821, 831 (1985).

MUR746500254
EXHIBIT 32.1

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL
OFFICER OF DTOMI, INC.

In connection with the  accompanying  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of Dtomi,
Inc.  for the  quarter  ended June 30,  2005,  the  undersigned,  David M. Otto,
Secretary  ,  director,  principal  executive  officer and  principal  financial
officer of Dtomi, Inc., does hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) such  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB for the  quarter  ended June 30, 2005
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the  information  contained in such Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB for the
quarter  ended June 30, 2005 fairly  presents,  in all  material  respects,  the
financial condition and results of operations of Dtomi, Inc.

Date: September 8, 2005

                                                 /s/ David M. Otto
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 David M. Otto
                                                 Chairman, Secretary, principal
                                                 executive officer and principal
                                                 financial officer
#### § 217.102 Permissible methods of taking.

Under LOAs issued pursuant to §§ 216.106 of this chapter and 217.106, the Holder of the LOA (hereinafter “UCSC/PISCO”) may incidentally, but not intentionally, take marine mammals within the area described in § 217.100(b) by Level B harassment associated with rocky intertidal monitoring activities, provided the activity is in compliance with all terms, conditions, and requirements of the regulations in this subpart and the appropriate LOA.
# Map            Comoros.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk December 26, 2012

h1217 

# Order

December 26, 2012

145992

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 145992

COA: 307331

Berrien CC: 2011

- 001568

- FC

EUSEAN CARRAOUL

- LAHTIF JENNINGS,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_______________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 13, 2012

judgment of t he Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
p. 1



# OAR Box 1384 Prepped by Charmelle Mathews



## Document

Number: 

# 138 ) ll-E-9 8 Docket Number: 

# A-94-5 2

Printed 7/2/2008 8:42:08 AM

Sheet 138 of 264P. 2 

# A-94-5 2 I I E<?$

Date sent : Tue , 0 8 Ju l 199 7 13:25:00-040 0 From : MADELEIN E STRU M < STRUM.MADELEINE@EPAMAIL.EPA.GO V > To : kmeardon@rtp.pes.com , mproctor@rtp.pes.co m Subject : Grea t Dan e inf o Here' s th e informatio n I receive d fro m Rick MullinexofGrea

t Dane : Th e composite s operatio n was sol d t o Fibe rPro , Inc

. Thei raddres s is : 7104 1 U S 13 1 Sout h P O Bo x153 Whit e Pidgeon , Michiga n 4909 9 Contact : (locate d i n th e Cadilla cMichiga n office ) Jac k Griffiths , 61 6 77 5 077 6 Facilit yphon e number : 61 6 48 3 767 1
§ 665.228 Gear identification. ( a ) The vessel number must be affixed to all fish and crab traps on board the vessel or deployed in the water by any vessel or person holding a permit under § 665.13 or § 665.124 or that is otherwise established to be fishing for Hawaii coral reef ECS in the management area.
( b ) *Enforcement action.* ( 1 ) Traps not marked in compliance with paragraph (a) of this section and found deployed in the Hawaii coral reef ecosystem management area will be considered unclaimed or abandoned property, and may be disposed of in any manner considered appropriate by NMFS or an authorized officer.
( 2 ) Unattended surround nets or bait seine nets found deployed in the Hawaii coral reef ecosystem management area will be considered unclaimed or abandoned property, and may be disposed of in any manner considered appropriate by NMFS or an authorized officer.
[75 FR 2205, Jan. 14, 2010, as amended at 84 FR 2773, Feb. 8, 2019]
###### Editorial Note on Part 622

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 622 appear at 79 FR 57837, Sept. 26, 2014 and at 81 FR 32253, May 23, 2016.

#### § 622.15 Notice regarding area closures to protect corals.

See §§ 622.74 and 622.224, respectively, regarding coral protective restrictions in the Gulf EEZ and South Atlantic EEZ that apply broadly to multiple fisheries and gear types.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-41227

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JOSE ANGEL GUTIERREZ-IBARRIA, also known as Jose Angel GutierrezIbarra, also known as Jose A. Gutierrez,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:10-CR-730-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, CLEMENT, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Angel GutierrezIbarria (Gutierrez) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in

accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v.

Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Gutierrez has not filed a response. We

have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected

therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

August 16, 2011

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 10-41227 Document: 00511573518 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/16/2011
No. 10-41227

nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave

to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

Case: 10-41227 Document: 00511573518 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/16/2011
§ 221.32 What happens if the ALJ becomes unavailable? ( a ) If the ALJ becomes unavailable or otherwise unable to perform the duties described in § 221.31, the Department of Commerce's designated ALJ office will designate a successor.
( b ) If a hearing has commenced and the ALJ cannot proceed with it, a successor ALJ may do so. At the request of a party, the successor ALJ may recall any witness whose testimony is material and disputed, and who is available to testify again without undue burden. The successor ALJ may, within his or her discretion, recall any other witness.
#### § 217.191 Effective dates.

Regulations in this subpart are effective from March 1, 2024, through February 28, 2029.
1

Joanna Waldstreicher

From: Jacquelyn Lopez <jlopez@elias.law>

Sent: Friday, September 9, 2022 2:05 PM

To: Joanna Waldstreicher; Varoon Modak

Cc: Amy Rothstein

Subject: RE: Advisory Opinion 2022-19 (Maggie for NH) Draft A

Hi Joanna,

Confirming that Maggie for NH is willing to grant the Commission an extension on this matter until September 16, 2022.

Thank you,

Jackie

Jacquelyn (“Jackie”) Lopez 

Elias Law Group LLP 

Partner 

10 G St NE Ste 600 

Washington DC 20002 

202-968-4514 

jlopez@elias.law 

CONFIDENTIAL: This email may contain privileged or confidential information and is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any unauthorized use or disclosure

of this communication is prohibited. If you believe that you have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete it from your system.

From: Joanna Waldstreicher <JWaldstreicher@fec.gov>  

Sent: Wednesday, September 7, 2022 5:41 PM

To: Jacquelyn Lopez <jlopez@elias.law>; Varoon Modak <vmodak@elias.law>

Cc: Amy Rothstein <ARothstein@fec.gov>

Subject: Advisory Opinion 2022‐19 (Maggie for NH) Draft A

Attached please find Draft A of Advisory Opinion 2022‐19 (Maggie for NH)  The Commission is also posting this draft on

its website, www.fec.gov, and is accepting public comments as described in the attached cover memorandum.  Kindly

confirm receipt by return email.  

Joanna S. Waldstreicher  

Federal Election Commission  

Office of General Counsel – Policy Division  

1050 First Street NE  

Washington, DC  20463  

202‐694‐1650
EX-4.2





 Exhibit 4.2 

EIGHT AMENDMENT TO THE MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT 

This EIGHT AMENDMENT TO THE MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”), dated as of June 26, 2020 is made by and between
Navios Maritime Acquisition Corporation, a Marshall Islands corporation (“NMAC”) and Navios Tankers Management Inc., a Marshall Islands corporation (“Tankers Management”, and together with NMAC, the
“Parties”) and amends the Management Agreement (including all amendments thereto, the “Agreement”) entered into between NMAC and Navios Shipmanagement Inc. (“Shipmanagement”) on May 28, 2010 as such
Agreement was assigned to Tankers Management via an assignment agreement among the Parties and Shipmanagement dated September 10, 2010 and subsequently amended. Capitalized terms used and not otherwise defined in this Amendment shall have the
meanings given them in the Agreement. 
 W I T N E S S E T H: 

WHEREAS, the Parties desire to amend the Agreement. 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby
acknowledged, the Parties hereby agree as follows: 
 1. The first paragraph of Schedule “B” shall be amended as follows: 

Add: “US$5,250 per day for container vessels of 1,500TEU up to 1,999TEU and US$6,100 per day for container vessels of 2,000 TEU up to
3,450 TEU” before “payable on the last day” 
 Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in separate counterparts, all of which
taken together shall constitute a single instrument. 
 [Remainder of page intentionally left blank. Signature page to follow.] 












 IN WITNESS ‘WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment effective as of
the day and year first above written. 
 NAVIOS MARITIME ACQUISITION CORPORATION 
  

			
	By:	 	/s/ Leonidas Korres
	Name: Leonidas Korres
	Title: Chief Financial Officer

 NAVIOS TANKERS MANAGEMENT INC. 
  

			
	By:	 	/s/ Efstratios Desypris
	Name: Efstratios Desypris
	Title: President/Director

 [Signature Page—Amendment to Management Agreement]
**EXHIBIT 23.2**

[Letterhead Of Miller And Lents, Ltd. Appears Here] 

February 25, 2009 

XTO Energy Inc. 

810 Houston Street 

Fort Worth, TX 76102 

Re: XTO EnergyInc.                             

2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K 

Gentlemen: 

The firm of Miller and Lents, Ltd., consents to the references to our firm in the form and context in which they appear and to the use of our report dated February 20, 2009, regardingthe XTO Energy Inc. Proved Reserves and Future Net Revenues as of December 31, 2008, in the 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K. We further consent to the incorporation by reference of our report in Registration Statements Nos. 333-135136,333-122767 and 333-123402 on Form S-3, and Registration Statements Nos. 333-68775, 333-69977, 333-37668, 333-81849, 333-91460, 333-120540, 333-152016 and 33-55784 on Form S-8 of XTO Energy Inc. 

Miller and Lents, Ltd., has no interests in XTO Energy Inc. or in any affiliated companies or subsidiaries and is not to receive any such interest aspayment for such reports and has no director, officer, or employee otherwise connected with XTO Energy Inc. We are not employed by XTO Energy Inc. on a contingent basis.
#### § 1004.1 Applicability and scope.

The applicability of the regulations in this part is described in § 1001.2 of this chapter. The regulations in this part also apply, regardless of land ownership, on all roadways and parking areas within the boundaries of the area administered by the Presidio Trust that are open to public traffic and that are under the legislative jurisdiction of the United States.
Editorial Note on Part 622
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 622 appear at 79 FR 57837, Sept. 26, 2014 and at 81 FR 32253, May 23, 2016.

§ 622.103 Aquaculture facilities. ( a ) *Siting requirements and conditions.* ( 1 ) No aquaculture facility may be sited in the Gulf EEZ within a marine protected area, marine reserve, Habitat Area of Particular Concern, Special Management Zone, permitted artificial reef area specified in this part or a coral area as defined in § 622.2.
( 2 ) No aquaculture facility may be sited within 1.6 nautical miles (3 km) of another aquaculture facility and all structures associated with the facility must remain within the sited boundaries.
( 3 ) To allow fallowing and rotation of approved aquaculture systems within a site permitted by the ACOE and approved by NMFS, the permitted site for the aquaculture facility must be at least twice as large as the combined area of the aquaculture systems.
( 4 ) The RA will evaluate siting criteria for proposed offshore aquaculture operations on a case-by-case basis. Criteria considered by the RA during case-by-case review include data, analyses, and results of the required baseline environmental survey as specified in § 622.101(a)(2)(v); depth of the site; the frequency of harmful algal blooms or hypoxia at the proposed site; marine mammal migratory pathways; the location of the site relative to commercial and recreational fishing grounds and important natural fishery habitats (*e.g.,* seagrasses). The RA may deny use of a proposed aquaculture site based on a determination by the RA that such a site poses significant risks to wild fish stocks, essential fish habitat, endangered or threatened species, marine mammals, will result in user conflicts with commercial or recreational fishermen or other marine resource users, will result in user conflicts with the OCS energy program, the depth of the site is not sufficient for the approved aquaculture system, substrate and currents at the site will inhibit the dispersal of wastes and effluents, the site is prone to low dissolved oxygen or harmful algal blooms, or other grounds inconsistent with FMP objectives or applicable Federal laws. The information used for siting a facility with regard to proximity to commercial and recreational fishing grounds includes electronic logbooks from the shrimp fishery, logbook reported fishing locations, siting information from previously proposed or permitted aquaculture facilities, and other data that would provide information regarding how the site would interact with other fisheries. The RA's determination will be based on consultations with appropriate NMFS and NOAA offices and programs, public comment, as well as siting and other information submitted by the permit applicant. If a proposed site is denied, the RA will deny the Gulf Aquaculture Permit and provide this determination as required by § 622.101(d)(2)(ii).
( b ) [Reserved]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 21-0230

_________________

DEPOSITORS INSURANCE COMPANY,

 Plaintiff and Appellee,

and SARA THARP,

 Plaintiff and Cross-Appellant,

 v.

PATRICK SANDIDGE,

 Defendant and Appellant.

O R D E R

_________________

Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for 

submission on briefs to a five-justice panel of this Court. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record and to the 

Honorable Kathy Seeley, District Judge.

For the Court,

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 19 2022

01/19/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0230