alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,442,855
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  106,423
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,549,278
<PP&E>                                       4,566,706
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,333,813
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,782,171
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          102,121
<BONDS>                                         22,990
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,657,060
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,782,171
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               853,046
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               575,377
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              39,438
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                238,231
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            238,231
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   238,321
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
# EUR-Lex - 12002E030 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 12002E030

**Treaty establishing the European Community (Nice consolidated version) - Part Three: Community policies - Title I: Free movement of goods - Chapter 2: Prohibition of quantitative restrictions between the Member States - Article 30 - Article 36 - EC Treaty (Maastricht consolidated version) - Article 36 - EEC Treaty **

*
Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0047 - 0047 Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0189 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0016 - Consolidated version (EEC Treaty - no official publication available) *

Treaty establishing the European Community (Nice consolidated version)

Part Three: Community policies

Title I: Free movement of goods

Chapter 2: Prohibition of quantitative restrictions between the Member States

Article 30

Article 36 - EC Treaty (Maastricht consolidated version)

Article 36 - EEC Treaty

Article 30

The provisions of Articles 28 and 29 shall not preclude prohibitions or restrictions on imports, exports or goods in transit justified on grounds of public morality, public policy or public security; the protection of health and life of humans, animals or plants; the protection of national treasures possessing artistic, historic or archaeological value; or the protection of industrial and commercial property. Such prohibitions or restrictions shall not, however, constitute a means of arbitrary discrimination or a disguised restriction on trade between Member States.
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








I, Jason
Smart,  Chief  Accounting  Officer  of
Makeover Corporation of
America (the
"Company"),  hereby  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act
of  2002,  that,  to my knowledge:





(1)
The  Company's  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for
the quarter  ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof
(the  "Report"),  fully  complies with
the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The  information  contained  in
the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and
results of operations of the Company.











/s/Jason Smart


Jason
Smart


Chief
Accounting Officer





Date:
November 12, 2009











-------------------


This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and  shall not be
deemed  filed by the  Company  for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A
signed  original of this
written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of
this written  statement required by Section 906,  has
been  provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 635.1 Purpose and scope. ( a ) The regulations in this part govern the conservation and management of Atlantic tunas, Atlantic billfish, Atlantic sharks, and Atlantic swordfish under the authority of the Magnuson-Stevens Act and ATCA. They implement the 2006 Consolidated Highly Migratory Species Fishery Management Plan and its amendments. The Atlantic tunas regulations govern conservation and management of Atlantic tunas in the management unit. The Atlantic billfish regulations govern conservation and management of Atlantic billfish in the management unit. The Atlantic swordfish regulations govern conservation and management of North and South Atlantic swordfish in the management unit. North Atlantic swordfish are managed under the authority of both ATCA and the Magnuson-Stevens Act. South Atlantic swordfish are managed under the sole authority of ATCA. The shark regulations govern conservation and management of sharks in the management unit, under the authority of the Magnuson-Stevens Act.
( b ) Under section 9(d) of ATCA, NMFS has determined that the regulations contained in this part with respect to Atlantic tunas are applicable within the territorial sea of the United States adjacent to, and within the boundaries of, the States of Maine, New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, New York, New Jersey, Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, Florida, Alabama, Louisiana, and Texas, and the Commonwealths of Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands. NMFS will undertake a continuing review of State regulations to determine if regulations applicable to Atlantic tunas, swordfish, or billfish are at least as restrictive as regulations contained in this part and if such regulations are effectively enforced. In such case, NMFS will file with the Office of the Federal Register for publication notification of the basis for the determination and of the specific regulations that shall or shall not apply in the territorial sea of the identified State.
[64 FR 29135, May 28, 1999, as amended at 75 FR 30524, June 1, 2010; 86 FR 42744, Aug. 5, 2021]
**Exhibit
31.1**
 
 Certification
of Principal Executive Officer
 
 I, Alan
J. Hyatt, certify that:
 
 1)
    I
      have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Severn Bancorp,
      Inc.;
 
 2)
    Based
      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
      material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
      annual report;
 
 3)
    Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects
      the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
      registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;
 
 4)
    The
      registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
      establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
      defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we
      have:
 
 a)
    designed
      such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
      information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
      subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
      particularly during the period in which this annual report is being
      prepared;
 
 b)
    [intentionally
      omitted]
 
 c)
    evaluated
      the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures
      and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
      the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
      covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and
 
 d)
    Disclosed
      in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
      financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent
      fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
      annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
      materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial
      reporting; and;
 
 5)
    The
      registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
      most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
      committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
      equivalent function):
 
 a)
    all
      significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
      which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
      summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
      registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls;
      and
 
 b)
    any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
      controls.
 
 Date:
March 15, 2005
 
 /s/
Alan J. Hyatt
 President
and Chief Executive Officer
#### § 37.44 Revocation and relinquishment.

For nonuse, for failure to comply with § 37.14, or for any action of the permittee not consistent with this part, the Regional Director may revoke or a permittee may relinquish a special use permit to conduct exploratory activities at any time by sending to the other a written notice of revocation or relinquishment. Such notice shall state the reasons for the revocation or relinquishment and shall be sent by registered mail, return receipt requested, at least 30 days in advance of the date that the revocation or relinquishment will be effective. Revocation or relinquishment of a permit to conduct exploratory activities shall not relieve the permittee of the obligation to comply with all other obligations specified in this part and in its special use permit, approved exploration plan and plan of operation. Reconsideration of the Regional Director's actions under this section may be obtained by employing the procedures described in § 37.22(c). A request for reconsideration shall not operate to stay the Regional Director actions unless such stay is granted in writing by the Director.
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








I, Jason
Smart,  Chief  Executive  Officer  of
Makeover Corporation of
America  (the
"Company"),  hereby  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act
of  2002,  that,  to my knowledge:





(1)
The  Company's  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for
the quarter  ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof
(the  "Report"),  fully  complies with
the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The  information  contained  in
the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and
results of operations of the Company.






/s/ Jason Smart
 Jason
Smart
 Chief Executive
Officer


Date:
November 12, 2009





-------------------


This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and  shall not be
deemed  filed by the  Company  for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A
signed  original of this
written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of
this written  statement required by Section 906,  has
been  provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 18.87 Direct testimony. ( a ) Only direct testimony submitted as provided in these regulations and introduced at the hearing by a witness shall be considered part of the record. Such direct testimony, when written, shall not be read into evidence but shall become a part of the record subject to exclusion of irrelevant and immaterial parts thereof.
( b ) The witness introducing direct testimony shall: ( 1 ) State his name, address and occupation;
( 2 ) State qualifications for introducing the direct testimony. If an expert, the witness shall briefly state the scientific or technical training which qualifies him as an expert;
( 3 ) Identify the direct testimony previously submitted in accordance with these regulations; and
( 4 ) Submit to appropriate cross- and direct-examination. Cross-examination shall be by a party whose interests are adverse on the issue presented to the witness if the witness is a party, or to the interests of the party who presented the witness.
( c ) A party shall be deemed to have waived the right to introduce direct-testimony if such party fails to present a witness to introduce the direct-testimony.
( d ) Official notice may be taken of such matters as are judicially noticed by the courts of the United States. Parties shall be given adequate notice, by the presiding officer, at the hearing, of matters so noticed and shall be given adequate opportunity to show that such facts are inaccurate or are erroneously noticed.
Editorial Note on Part 622
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 622 appear at 79 FR 57837, Sept. 26, 2014 and at 81 FR 32253, May 23, 2016.

§ 622.177 Gear identification. ( a ) *Sea bass pots and associated buoys* — ( 1 ) *Sea bass pots.* A sea bass pot used or possessed in the South Atlantic EEZ between 35°15.19′ N. lat. (due east of Cape Hatteras Light, NC) and 28°35.1′ N. lat. (due east of the NASA Vehicle Assembly Building, Cape Canaveral, FL), or a sea bass pot on board a vessel with a commercial permit for South Atlantic snapper-grouper, must have a valid identification tag issued by the RA attached.
( 2 ) *Associated buoys.* In the South Atlantic EEZ, buoys are not required to be used, but, if used, each buoy must display the official number and color code assigned by the RA so as to be easily distinguished, located, and identified.
( 3 ) *Presumption of ownership.* A sea bass pot in the EEZ will be presumed to be the property of the most recently documented owner. This presumption will not apply with respect to such pots that are lost or sold if the owner reports the loss or sale within 15 days to the RA.
( 4 ) *Unmarked sea bass pots or buoys.* An unmarked sea bass pot or a buoy deployed in the EEZ where such pot or buoy is required to be marked is illegal and may be disposed of in any appropriate manner by the Assistant Administrator or an authorized officer.
( b ) [Reserved]
<PAGE>




                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.3


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

        In connection with the September 30, 2002 Form 10-QSB/A of Intrepid
Technology & Resources, Inc., (the "Company") as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Dr. Dennis D. Keiser,
certify that the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

        This certificate is being furnished solely for purposes of Section 906
and is not being filed as part of the Periodic Report.

        A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Intrepid Technology & Resources, Inc., and will be retained by
Intrepid Technology & Resources, Inc., and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Dated: June 13, 2003


/s/ Dr. Dennis D. Keiser





----------------------------------------


Dennis D. Keiser

President and Chief Executive Officer


                                       22
# Secretary Dan Glickman's Column

Garden of Eatin', a small California
company, has become the top corn chip supplier to Singapore. Japan bought $2.5
billion worth of U.S. beef and pork in 1995, a third more than the year before.
Kansas pet food shipments to Japan are up 26 percent. Sales of U.S. sugar and
sweeteners in the form of candy have set export records for nine straight years,
creating more than 12,000 American jobs. And just about everybody in Asia is
eating apples from Washington State.

There is no question that trade and exports are the future for American
agriculture. In the 21st century, commodity payments and support prices will be
far less important than ensuring that American agriculture remains competitive
globally.

The increasing importance of trade is particularly true for agriculture,
which continues to be one of the biggest contributors to the nation's improving
trade picture. U.S. agricultural exports reached an all-time high of $54.1
billion in Fiscal Year 1995. Exports for FY96 are expected to reach $58 billion.
And we hope to increase U.S. agricultural exports by 50 percent by the year
2000--up 7 percent a year.

Sometimes it's difficult to imagine the relevance to our daily lives of
numbers of this magnitude. But these record export figures do have a direct
impact on many moderate and smaller size farms in the U.S.

It all means more jobs and higher incomes across the nation. U.S.
agricultural exports generate more than $100 billion annually in business
activity throughout the U.S. economy and provide jobs for nearly a million
workers.

A 50 percent increase in agricultural exports by 2000 will mean a 13 percent
gain in annual net farm income, a $50 billion gain in total U.S. economic
activity, and 378,000 additional U.S. jobs.

These numbers show we've come a long way in improving our competitiveness in
world markets. We produce products that foreign customers want and--with
government trade barriers coming down--those consumers are now better able to
buy them.

We expect to see export gains almost everywhere, but the most significant
increases will occur in Asia. Of the 20 best-growth markets for U.S.
agricultural exports, 11 are in the Pacific Rim which is experiencing the
fastest economic and population growth in the world. The Uruguay Round of the
GATT could boost U.S. exports to the Pacific Rim by $3 billion by 2000.

U.S. agriculture must meet competition head-on because our competitors are
not standing still. Now is not the time for unilateral disarmament.

A strong agriculture benefits the whole country, so USDA will continue to
work closely with the Congress to protect the export assistance that helps keep
our agriculture strong. Reducing such assistance could hurt not only U.S.
farmers and the agricultural economy, but all U.S. workers and the nation's
economy as a whole.  ¤

### Return
to: Inside the
"USDA NEWS"Past
IssuesNews and Current
Information  USDA's ...Homepage
###### Editorial Note on Part 622

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 622 appear at 79 FR 57837, Sept. 26, 2014 and at 81 FR 32253, May 23, 2016.

#### § 622.505 Management area.

The management area is the EEZ around St. Thomas and St. John bounded by rhumb lines connecting the following points and geographic instructions in order:

| Point | North lat. | West long. |
| --- | --- | --- |
| A (intersects with the international and EEZ boundary) | 19°37′29′′ | 65°20′57′′ |
| From Point A proceed along the international and EEZ boundary southeasterly to Point G | | |
| G | 18°03′03′′ | 64°38′03′′ |
| D | 18°01′16.9636′′ | 64°57′38.817′′ |
| C | 18°13′59.0606′′ | 65°05′33.058′′ |
| From Point C proceed along the 3-nautical mile territorial boundary around St. Thomas and St. John northerly to Point B | | |
| B | 18°25′46.3015′′ | 65°06′31.866′′ |
| A (intersects with the international and EEZ boundary) | 19°37′29′′ | 65°20′57′′ |

Table 1 to § 622.505
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5125

To amend the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977 to enhance the availability of investment capital for low- and moderate-income housing in lowand moderate-income neighborhoods.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 28, 1994

Mrs. ROUKEMA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Banking, Finance and Urban Affairs

A BILL

To amend the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977 to

enhance the availability of investment capital for lowand moderate-income housing in low- and moderate-income neighborhoods.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Community Reinvest5 ment Improvement Act of 1994’’.
2

HR 5125 IH

1 SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS TO COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT ACT

2 OF 1977.

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 804(a)(1) of the Commu4 nity Reinvestment Act of 1977 (12 U.S.C. 2903(a)(1)) is

5 amended by inserting ‘‘or of targeted low- and moderate6 income neighborhoods designated by the appropriate Fed7 eral financial supervisory agency or the appropriate State

8 bank supervisor’’ after ‘‘neighborhoods,’’.

9 (b) AMENDMENT TO PURPOSES.—Section 802(b) of

10 the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977 (12 U.S.C.

11 2901(b)) is amended by inserting ‘‘or of targeted low- and

12 moderate-income neighborhoods designated by the appro13 priate Federal financial supervisory agency or the appro14 priate State bank supervisor’’ after ‘‘chartered’’.

15 (c) AMENDMENT TO DEFINITIONS.—Section 803 of

16 the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977 (12 U.S.C.

17 2902) is amended by adding at the end the following new

18 paragraph:

19 ‘‘(5) STATE BANK SUPERVISOR.—The term

20 ‘‘State bank supervisor’’ has the same meaning as in

21 section 3(r) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act.’’.

Æ