alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 665.19 Vessel monitoring system. ( a ) *Applicability.* The holder of any of the following permits is subject to the vessel monitoring system requirements in this part: ( 1 ) Hawaii longline limited access permit issued pursuant to § 665.801(b);
( 2 ) American Samoa large vessel longline limited entry permit issued pursuant to § 665.801(c);
( 3 ) Vessels permitted to fish in Crustacean Permit Area 1 VMS Subarea; or
( 4 ) CNMI commercial bottomfish permit, if the vessel is a medium or large bottomfish vessel, issued pursuant to § 665.404(a)(2).
( b ) *VMS unit.* Only a VMS unit owned by NMFS and installed by NMFS complies with the requirement of this subpart.
( c ) *Notification.* After a permit holder subject to § 665.19(a) has been notified by the SAC of a specific date for installation of a VMS unit on the permit holder's vessel, the vessel must carry and operate the VMS unit after the date scheduled for installation.
( d ) *Fees and charges.* During the experimental VMS program, the holder of a permit subject to § 665.19(a) shall not be assessed any fee or other charges to obtain and use a VMS unit, including the communication charges related directed to requirements under this section. Communication charges related to any additional equipment attached to the VMS unit by the owner or operator shall be the responsibility of the owner or operator and not NMFS.
( e ) *Permit holder duties.* The holder of a permit subject to § 665.19(a) and master of the vessel must: ( 1 ) Provide opportunity for the SAC to install and make operational a VMS unit after notification.
( 2 ) Carry and continuously operate the VMS unit on board whenever the vessel is at sea.
( 3 ) Not remove, relocate, or make non-operational the VMS unit without prior approval from the SAC.
( f ) *Authorization by the SAC.* The SAC has authority over the installation and operation of the VMS unit. The SAC may authorize the connection or order the disconnection of additional equipment, including a computer, to any VMS unit when deemed appropriate by the SAC.
[75 FR 2205, Jan. 14, 2010, as amended at 86 FR 55745, Oct. 7, 2021]
§ 600.810 Definitions and word usage. ( a ) *Definitions.* In addition to the definitions in the Magnuson-Stevens Act and § 600.10, the terms in this subpart have the following meanings: *Adverse effect* means any impact that reduces quality and/or quantity of EFH. Adverse effects may include direct or indirect physical, chemical, or biological alterations of the waters or substrate and loss of, or injury to, benthic organisms, prey species and their habitat, and other ecosystem components, if such modifications reduce the quality and/or quantity of EFH. Adverse effects to EFH may result from actions occurring within EFH or outside of EFH and may include site-specific or habitat-wide impacts, including individual, cumulative, or synergistic consequences of actions.
*Council* includes the Secretary, as applicable, when preparing FMPs or amendments under sections 304(c) and (g) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act.
*Ecosystem* means communities of organisms interacting with one another and with the chemical and physical factors making up their environment.
*Habitat areas of particular concern* means those areas of EFH identified pursuant to § 600.815(a)(8).
*Healthy ecosystem* means an ecosystem where ecological productive capacity is maintained, diversity of the flora and fauna is preserved, and the ecosystem retains the ability to regulate itself. Such an ecosystem should be similar to comparable, undisturbed ecosystems with regard to standing crop, productivity, nutrient dynamics, trophic structure, species richness, stability, resilience, contamination levels, and the frequency of diseased organisms.
*Overfished* means any stock or stock complex, the status of which is reported as overfished by the Secretary pursuant to section 304(e)(1) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act.
( b ) *Word usage.* The terms “must”, “shall”, “should”, “may”, “may not”, “will”, “could”, and “can” are used in the same manner as in § 600.305(c).
THE STATE OF TEXAS

MANDATE

TO THE 188TH DISTRICT COURT OF GREGG COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 6th 

day of May, A.D. 2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your Judgment was determined; 

and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

Sylvester Kelly, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

No. 06-12-00141-CR

Trial Court No. 41,078-A

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Sylvester Kelly, has adequately indicated his inability to pay 

costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court in this 

behalf, and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS, the Hon. Josh R. Morriss, III, Chief Justice of our said Court of Appeals, with 

the seal thereof annexed, at the City of Texarkana, this the 13th day of July, A.D. 2015.

DEBRA K. AUTREY, Clerk
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Water and EnvironmentalPrograms annual activity report for...**
 
2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2012 | 2013
 
SuDoc Number:A 68.1/6:
Item Number:0115-A-06 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000558536
 
February 13, 2020
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 975/2005

of 24 June 2005         

determining the extent to which applications lodged in June 2005 for import licences under the regime provided for by tariff quotas for certain products in the pigmeat sector for the period 1 July to 30 September 2005 can be accepted

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1458/2003 of 18 August 2003 opening and providing for the administration of tariff quotas for certain products in the pigmeat sector (1), and in particular Article 5(6) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

1.   Applications for import licences for the period 1 July to 30 September 2005 submitted pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1458/2003 shall be met as referred to in Annex I.

2.   For the period 1 October to 31 December 2005, applications may be lodged pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1458/2003 for import licences for a total quantity as referred to in Annex II.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 1 July 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 24 June 2005.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

----

(1)OJ L 208, 19.8.2003, p. 3. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 341/2005 (OJ L 53, 26.2.2005, p. 28).

----

ANNEX I

----

ANNEX II

----
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Donald Sharpe, President, and Drew Bonnell, Secretary, Treasurer and CFO of E-Com Technologies Corporation, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)	the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of E-Com Technologies Corporation for the period ended March 31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)	the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of E-Com Technologies Corporation

Dated: May 17, 2004

/s/ Donald SharpeDonald Sharpe, President
(Principal Executive Officer)

/s/ Drew BonnellDrew Bonnell
Secretary, Treasurer and CFO
(Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to E-Com Technologies Corporation and will be retained by E-Com Technologies Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# EUR-Lex - 12004V419 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V419

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART III — THE POLICIES AND FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - TITLE VI — THE FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - CHAPTER III — ENHANCED COOPERATION - Article III-419 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0180 - 0181 *

Article III-419

1. Member States which wish to establish enhanced cooperation between themselves in one of the areas covered by the Constitution, with the exception of fields of exclusive competence and the common foreign and security policy, shall address a request to the Commission, specifying the scope and objectives of the enhanced cooperation proposed. The Commission may submit a proposal to the Council to that effect. In the event of the Commission not submitting a proposal, it shall inform the Member States concerned of the reasons for not doing so.

Authorisation to proceed with enhanced cooperation shall be granted by a European decision of the Council, which shall act on a proposal from the Commission and after obtaining the consent of the European Parliament.

2. The request of the Member States which wish to establish enhanced cooperation between themselves within the framework of the common foreign and security policy shall be addressed to the Council. It shall be forwarded to the Union Minister for Foreign Affairs, who shall give an opinion on whether the enhanced cooperation proposed is consistent with the Union's common foreign and security policy, and to the Commission, which shall give its opinion in particular on whether the enhanced cooperation proposed is consistent with other Union policies. It shall also be forwarded to the European Parliament for information.

Authorisation to proceed with enhanced cooperation shall be granted by a European decision of the Council acting unanimously.

--------------------------------------------------
#### § 84.43 How do States get the grant monies?

Funding to States is provided on a reimbursable basis. See § 84.47 for information on what costs can be reimbursed. The Service may reimburse the State for projects completed, or make payments as the project progresses. For construction work and labor, the Service and the State may jointly determine, on a case-by-case basis, that payments may be made in advance. We will minimize the time elapsing between the transfer to the State and the State's need for the funds, and the time period will be subject to a specific determined need for the funds in advance. Except for extenuating circumstances, a reasonable time period to advance funds to a State is up to 3 days. OMB Circular A-102, Parts II and III, 43 CFR part 12, and 31 CFR part 205 provide specific information on methods and procedures for transferring funds.
##### 



Exhibit 21

NATIONAL VISION, INC.

SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

|                                                        |  |                 |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------- |  | 
|                                                        |  | Jurisdiction of
|Name of Subsidiary                                      |  | Incorporation  
|                                                        |  |                
|NVAL Healthcare Systems, Inc.                           |  | Georgia        
|NVAL Visioncare Systems of California, Inc.             |  | California     
|International Vision Associates, Ltd.                   |  | Georgia        
|Mexican Vision Associates, S.A. de C.V.                 |  | Mexico         
|Mexican Vision Associates Operadora, S. de R.L. de C.V. |  | Mexico         
|Mexican Vision Associates Servicios, S. de R.L. de C.V. |  | Mexico
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 5094 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 5094

     To amend the Emergency Food Assistance Act of 1983 to provide 
additional agricultural products for distribution by emergency feeding 
                 organizations, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 18, 2024

   Mr. Casey introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend the Emergency Food Assistance Act of 1983 to provide 
additional agricultural products for distribution by emergency feeding 
                 organizations, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Farm to Food Bank Reauthorization 
Act of 2024''.

SEC. 2. PROJECTS FOR STATES TO PURCHASE PRIORITY AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS.

    (a) In General.--Section 203D of the Emergency Food Assistance Act 
of 1983 (7 U.S.C. 7507) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a), by striking ``donate'' and inserting 
        ``donate, sell, or otherwise provide'';
            (2) in subsection (b), by striking ``donated for the use 
        of'' and inserting ``donated or otherwise provided for the use 
        of, or sold to,''; and
            (3) in subsection (d)--
                    (A) in paragraph (1), by striking ``donated'' and 
                inserting ``donated, sold, or otherwise provided'';
                    (B) in paragraph (2)--
                            (i) in subparagraph (B), by striking ``50'' 
                        and inserting ``75''; and
                            (ii) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(D) Reimbursement for costs.--In carrying out a 
                project, a State may reimburse an agricultural 
                producer, processor, or distributor participating in 
                the project for eligible costs, as determined by the 
                Secretary.'';
                    (C) in paragraph (3)(A), by striking ``donation'' 
                and inserting ``donation, sale, or other provision''; 
                and
                    (D) in paragraph (5), by striking ``$4,000,000 for 
                each of fiscal years 2019 through 2024'' and inserting 
                ``$8,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2024 through 
                2029''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 202A(b)(5) of the Emergency Food 
Assistance Act of 1983 (7 U.S.C. 7503(b)(5)) is amended by striking 
``donated commodities received under section 203D(d)'' and inserting 
``commodities received under subsection (c) or (d) of section 203D''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 665.799 Area restrictions. ( a ) Fishing is prohibited in all no-take MPAs designated in this section.
( b ) No-take MPAs. The following U.S. EEZ waters are no-take MPAs: ( 1 ) Landward of the 50-fathom (fm) (91.5-m) curve at Jarvis, Howland, and Baker Islands, and Kingman Reef; as depicted on National Ocean Survey Chart Numbers 83116 and 83153;
( 2 ) Landward of the 50-fm (91.5-m) curve around Rose Atoll, as depicted on National Ocean Survey Chart Number 83484.
#### § 20.34 Opening day of a season.

No person on the opening day of the season shall possess any freshly killed migratory game birds in excess of the daily bag limit, or aggregate daily bag limit, whichever applies.
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

36 38 40 

### ★
▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 06/19 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 19 Jun 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.06 N 76.88 WMeters AGL
AFS-10-040-E 

April 1, 2010 

 Exemption No. 10046 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2009-0988 

Mr. Kevin R. Bruce 

Diamond Aircraft Industries, Inc. 

1560 Crumlin Sideroad 

London, Ontario 

N5V 1S2 

Dear Mr. Bruce: 

This letter is to inform you that we have denied your petition for exemption. It transmits our 

decision and explains its basis. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter dated October 15, 2009, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) 

on behalf of Diamond Aircraft Industries, Inc. (Diamond Aircraft), for an exemption from 

§§ 61.31(e), 61.123(g), and 61.129(a)(3)(ii) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations 

(14 CFR) to the extent necessary to allow Diamond Aircraft to use certain fixed gear airplanes 

for the conduct of a commercial pilot practical test (§ 61.123(g)) as well as to conduct some 

of the required training for a commercial pilot certificate (§ 61.129(a)(3)(ii)). 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent. 

The FAA recently issued a denial of exemption in circumstances similar in all material 

respects to those presented in your petition. In Denial of Exemption No. 10005 (copy 

enclosed), the FAA found that there is insufficient safety data regarding the use of the 

portable training device (U.S. Patent 6,638,071) in a non-complex single-engine land airplane 

to determine that equivalent level of safety would be achieved when used during training and 

during the practical test phase of airmen certification under part 61 subpart F-- Commercial 

Pilots. However, the FAA is in the process of collecting safety data from Mr. Gregg 
2 

Stockman (Exemption No. 9778A) regarding the conduct of commercial pilot training and the 

commercial pilot practical test using the portable training device with U.S. Patent 

No. 6,638,071. 

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that— 

• they do not differ materially from those presented by the petitioner in the enclosed denial 

of exemption; 

• the reasons stated by the FAA for denying the enclosed exemption also apply to the 

situation you present; and 

• a grant of exemption would not be in the public interest. 

Our Decision 

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator 

has delegated to me, I hereby deny your petition on behalf of Diamond Aircraft Industries, 

Inc., for an exemption from 14 CFR §§ 61.31(e), 61.123(g), and 61.129(a)(3)(ii). 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Raymond Towles 

Acting Director, Flight Standards 

 Service 

Enclosure
# Projects Investments Map - Delta Regional Authority

- Sewage Treatment Facility – Completion The post Sewage Treatment Facility &#8211; Completion appeared first on Delta Regional Authority.
- Vulcan Plant Upgrade The post Vulcan Plant Upgrade appeared first on Delta Regional Authority.
- Technology Park Opportunity Zone Lead Rail Expansion The post Technology Park Opportunity Zone Lead Rail Expansion appeared first on Delta Regional Authority.
- Infrastructure Expansion for Lexington Meat Company The post Infrastructure Expansion for Lexington Meat Company appeared first on Delta Regional Authority.
- Maynard Water System Improvements The post Maynard Water System Improvements appeared first on Delta Regional Authority.
- Tate County, MS – Hogfoot Road Improvement Project The post Tate County, MS – Hogfoot Road Improvement Project appeared first on Delta Regional Authority.
- Emergency Response and Training Station: North Mississippi The post Emergency Response and Training Station: North Mississippi appeared first on Delta Regional Authority.
- Crawfordsville Water Towers The post Crawfordsville Water Towers appeared first on Delta Regional Authority.
- DIGITAL WORKFORCE TRAINING & EMPLOYMENT INITIATIVE The post DIGITAL WORKFORCE TRAINING &#038; EMPLOYMENT INITIATIVE appeared first on Delta Regional Authority.
- Crockett County Distributor Site Improvements The post Crockett County Distributor Site Improvements appeared first on Delta Regional Authority.
# EUR-Lex - 12002E284 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 12002E284

**Treaty establishing the European Community (Nice consolidated version) - Part Six: General and Final Provisions - Article 284 - Article 213 - EC Treaty (Maastricht consolidated version) - Article 213 - EEC Treaty **

*
Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0146 - 0146 Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0294 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0075 - Consolidated version (EEC Treaty - no official publication available) *

Treaty establishing the European Community (Nice consolidated version)

Part Six: General and Final Provisions

Article 284

Article 213 - EC Treaty (Maastricht consolidated version)

Article 213 - EEC Treaty

Article 284

The Commission may, within the limits and under conditions laid down by the Council in accordance with the provisions of this Treaty, collect any information and carry out any checks required for the performance of the tasks entrusted to it.
# EUR-Lex - 12004V062 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V062

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART II — THE CHARTER OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THE UNION - TITLE I — DIGNITY - Article II-62 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0042 - 0042 *

Article II-62

Right to life

1. Everyone has the right to life.

2. No one shall be condemned to the death penalty, or executed.

--------------------------------------------------