Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 148 / Friday, August 1, 2014 / Notices 44769 

necessary resources to respond to an oil 

spill in a timely manner. If implemented 

effectively, the FRP will reduce the 

impact and severity of oil spills and 

may prevent spills because of the 

identification of risks at the facility. 

Although the owner or operator is the 

primary data user, EPA also uses the 

data in certain situations to ensure that 

facilities comply with the regulation 

and to help allocate response resources. 

State and local governments may use 

the data, which are not generally 

available elsewhere and can greatly 

assist local emergency preparedness 

planning efforts. The EPA reviews all 

submitted FRPs and must approve FRPs 

for those facilities whose discharges 

may cause significant and substantial 

harm to the environment in order to 

ensure that facilities believed to pose 

the highest risk have planned for 

adequate resources and procedures to 

respond to a spill. (See 40 CFR 

112.20(f)(3) for further information 

about the criteria for significant and 

substantial harm.) None of the 

information collected under the FRP 

rule is believed to be confidential. One 

of the criteria necessary for information 

to be classified as confidential (40 CFR 

2.208) is that a business must show that 

it has previously taken reasonable 

measures to protect the confidentiality 

of the information and that it intends to 

continue to take such measures. The 

EPA has provided no assurances of 

confidentiality to facility owners or 

operators when they file their FRPs. 

Form Numbers: None. 

Respondents/affected entities: Entities 

potentially affected by this action are 

the owner or operator of a facility that 

is required to have a spill prevention, 

control, and countermeasure (SPCC) 

plan under the Oil Pollution Prevention 

regulation (40 CFR part 112) and that 

could cause substantial harm to the 

environment must prepare and submit 

to EPA an FRP. The criteria for a 

substantial harm facility include: (1) 

The facility transfers oil over water to or 

from a vessel and has a total storage 

capacity of greater than or equal to 

42,000 gallons; or (2) the facility’s total 

oil storage capacity is greater than or 

equal to one million gallons and one or 

more of the following harm factors are 

met: Insufficient secondary 

containment; proximity to fish and 

wildlife and sensitive environments; a 

discharge of oil could shut down a 

drinking water intake; the facility 

experienced a reportable oil discharge of 

10,000 gallons or more in last 5 years; 

or other factors considered by the 

Regional Administrator. (See 40 CFR 

112.20(b)(1) and (f) for further 

information about the criteria for 

substantial harm.) 

Respondent’s obligation to respond: 

Mandatory under section 311(j)(5) of the 

Clean Water Act, as amended by the Oil 

Pollution Act of 1990. 

Estimated number of respondents: 

22,966 (total). 

Frequency of response: Less than once 

per year. 

Total estimated burden: 455,743 

hours (per year). Burden is defined at 5 

CFR 1320.03(b). 

Total estimated cost (with overhead): 

$17,630,700 (per year), includes $14,763 

annualized capital or operation & 

maintenance costs. 

Changes in estimates: The EPA 

estimates that there is slight reduction 

in the hours of total estimated 

respondent burden (approximate 

reduction of 7,676 hours) compared 

with the ICR currently approved by 

OMB. This estimate is based on EPA’s 

current inventory of facilities that have 

submitted and are maintaining an FRP 

as per 40 CFR part 112 versus the 

projected inventory. The EPA has not 

amended the FRP regulation since the 

last ICR renewal that would affect the 

per-facility burden. The EPA will 

consider the comments received and 

amend the ICR as appropriate. 

Dated: July 28, 2014. 

Lawrence M. Stanton, 

Office Director, Office of Emergency 

Management. 

[FR Doc. 2014–18194 Filed 7–31–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[ER–FRL–9016–2] 

Environmental Impact Statements; 

Notice of Availability 

Responsible Agency: Office of Federal 

Activities, General Information (202) 

564–7146 or http://www.epa.gov/

compliance/nepa/. 

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact 

Statements 

Filed 07/21/2014 Through 07/25/2014 

Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9. 

Notice 

Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act 

requires that EPA make public its 

comments on EISs issued by other 

Federal agencies. EPA’s comment letters 

on EISs are available at: http://

www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/

eisdata.html. 

EIS No. 20140202, Final EIS, NPS, MD, 

Antietam National Battlefield, 

Monocacy National Battlefield, 

Manassas National Battlefield Park, 

Final White-tailed Deer Management 

Plan, Review Period Ends: 09/03/

2014, Contact: Tracy Atkins 303–969– 

2325. 

EIS No. 20140203, Final EIS, USFS, CO, 

Gore Creek Restoration, Review Period 

Ends: 09/02/2014, Contact: Doug 

Myhre 970–638–4178. 

EIS No. 20140204, Final EIS, USACE, 

NC, Village of Bald Head Island 

Shoreline Stabilization Project, 

Review Period Ends: 09/02/2014, 

Contact: Ronnie Smith 910–251–4829. 

EIS No. 20140205, Final EIS, USFWS, 

OH, Ballville Dam Project, Review 

Period Ends: 09/02/2014, Contact: 

Brian Elkington 612–713–5168. 

EIS No. 20140206, Draft EIS, FHWA, 

NY, Portageville Bridge Project, 

Comment Period Ends: 09/15/2014, 

Contact: Jonathan McDade 518–431– 

4127. 

EIS No. 20140207, Final EIS, USACE, 

SC, Haile Gold Mine Project, Review 

Period Ends: 09/02/2014, Contact: Dr. 

Richard L. Darden 843–329–8043. 

EIS No. 20140208, Final EIS, NOAA, MI, 

Thunder Bay National Marine 

Sanctuary Boundary Expansion, 

Review Period Ends: 09/02/2014, 

Contact: Helene Scalliet 301–713– 

7281. 

EIS No. 20140209, Draft EIS, USACE, 

CA, San Elijo Lagoon Restoration 

Project, Comment Period Ends: 

09/29/2014, Contact: Meris BantilanSmith 760–602–4836. 

Dated: July 29, 2014. 

Cliff Rader, 

Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office 

of Federal Activities. 

[FR Doc. 2014–18272 Filed 7–31–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[EPA–HQ–ORD–2014–0564; FRL–9914–72– 

ORD] 

Human Studies Review Board; 

Notification of a Public Webinar/

Teleconference 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) Office of the Science 

Advisor announces a public Webinar/

teleconference of the Human Studies 

Review Board (HSRB) to discuss its 

draft report on the HSRB meeting held 

August 15, 2014. 

DATES: The Webinar/teleconference will 

be held on Friday, August 15, 2014, 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES