Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 194 / Friday, October 6, 2006 / Proposed Rules 59031 

(d) Fees for audit services will be 

based on the time and expenses 

required to perform the audit. The 

hourly charge shall be $82.16 and shall 

include the time actually required to 

perform the audit, waiting time, travel 

time, travel expenses and any clerical 

costs involved in issuing a certificate. 

(e) Audit services rendered on 

Saturdays, Sundays, or legal holidays 

shall be charged for at the rate of 

$102.84 per hour. Information on legal 

holidays is available from the 

Supervisor. 

10. Section 70.77 is amended by 

removing in paragraph (a)(4) ‘‘$0.00039’’

and adding ‘‘$0.00043’’ in its place, 

removing ‘‘$260’’ and adding ‘‘$275’’ in 

its place, and removing ‘‘$2,875’’ and 

adding ‘‘$3,075’’ in its place. 

Dated: September 29, 2006. 

Kenneth C. Clayton, 

Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing 

Service. 

[FR Doc. E6–16528 Filed 10–5–06; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 71 

[Docket No. FAA–2006–25436; Airspace 

Docket No. 06–AGL–05] 

Proposed Modification of Class E 

Airspace; Hayward, WI 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. 

SUMMARY: This document proposes to 

modify Class E airspace at Hayward, WI. 

Standard Instrument Approach 

Procedures have been developed for 

Sawyer County Airport, Hayward, WI. 

Controlled airspace extending upward 

from 700 feet or more above the surface 

of the earth is needed to contain aircraft 

executing these approaches. This action 

would increase the area of the existing 

controlled airspace for Hayward, WI. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before November 24, 2006. 

ADDRESSES: Send comments on the 

proposal to the Docket Management 

System, U.S. Department of 

Transportation, Room Plaza 401, 400 

Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 

20590–0001. You must identify the 

docket Number FAA–2006–/Airspace 

Docket No. 06–AGL–05, at the 

beginning of your comments. You may 

also submit comments on the Internet at 

http://dms.dot.gov. You may review the 

public docket containing the proposal, 

any comments received, and any final 

disposition in person in the Dockets 

Office between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., 

Monday through Friday, except Federal 

holidays. The Docket Office (telephone 

1–800–647–5527) is on the plaza level 

of the Department of Transportation 

NASSIF Building at the above address. 

An informal docket may also be 

examined during normal business hours 

at FAA Terminal Operations, Central 

Service Office, 2300 East Devon 

Avenue, Des Plaines, Illinois 60018. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Steve Davis, FAA Terminal Operations, 

Central Service Office, System Support 

Branch, Federal Aviation 

Administration, 2300 East Devon 

Avenue, Des Plaines, Illinois 60018, 

telephone (847) 294–7131. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Comments Invited 

Interested parties are invited to 

participate in this proposed rulemaking 

by submitting such written data, views, 

or arguments as they may desire. 

Comments that provide the factual basis 

supporting the views and suggestions 

presented are particularly helpful in 

developing reasoned regulatory 

decisions on the proposal. Comments 

are specifically invited on the overall 

regulatory, aeronautical, economic, 

environmental, and energy-related 

aspects of the proposal. 

Communications should identify both 

docket numbers and be submitted in 

triplicate to the address listed above. 

Commenters wishing the FAA to 

acknowledge receipt of their comments 

on this document must submit with 

those comments a self-addressed, 

stamped postcard on which the 

following statement is made: 

‘‘Comments to Docket No. FAA–2006–

25436/Airspace Docket No. 06–AGL–

05.’’ The postcard will be date/time 

stamped and returned to the 

commenter. All communications 

received on or before the specified 

closing date for comments will be 

considered before taking action on the 

proposed rule. The proposal contained 

in this action may be changed in light 

of comments received. All comments 

submitted will be available for 

examination in the Rules Docket, FAA, 

Great Lakes Region, Office of the 

Regional Counsel, 2300 East Devon 

Avenue, Des Plaines, Illinois, both 

before and after the closing date for 

comments. A report summarizing each 

substantive public contact with FAA 

personnel concerned with this 

rulemaking will be filed in the docket. 

Availability of NPRM’s 

An electronic copy of this document 

may be downloaded through the 

Internet at http://dms.dot.gov. Recently 

published rulemaking documents can 

also be accessed through the FAA’s Web 

page at http://www.faa.gov or the 

Superintendent of Document’s Web 

page at http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara. 

Additionally, any person may obtain 

a copy of this notice by submitting a 

request to the Federal Aviation 

Administration, Office of Air Traffic 

Airspace Management, ATA–400, 800 

Independence Avenue, SW., 

Washington, DC 20591, or by calling 

(202) 267–8783. Communications must 

identify both docket numbers for this 

notice. Persons interested in being 

placed on a mailing list for future 

NPRM’s should contact the FAA’s 

Office of Rulemaking, (202) 267–9677, 

to request a copy of Advisory Circular 

No. 11–2A, Notice of Proposed 

Rulemaking Distribution System, which 

describes the application procedure. 

The Proposal 

The FAA is considering an 

amendment to 14 CFR part 71 to modify 

Class E airspace at Hayward, WI, for 

Sawyer County Airport. Controlled 

airspace extending upward from 700 

feet above the surface of the earth is 

needed to contain aircraft executing 

instrument approach procedures. Class 

E airspace areas extending upward from 

700 feet above the surface of the earth 

are published in paragraph 6005 of FAA 

Order 7400.9N dated September 1, 2005, 

and effective September 16, 2005, which 

is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 

71.1. The Class E designations listed in 

this document would be removed 

subsequently in the Order. 

The FAA has determined that this 

proposed regulation only involves an 

established body of technical 

regulations for which frequent and 

routine amendments are necessary to 

keep them operationally current. 

Therefore this, proposed regulation—(1) 

is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’

under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not 

a ‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT 

Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 

FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3) 

does not warrant preparation of a 

Regulatory Evaluation as the anticipated 

impact is so minimal. Since this is a 

routine matter that will only affect air 

traffic procedures and air navigation, it 

is certified that this proposed rule will 

not have a significant economic impact 

on a substantial number of small entities 

under the criteria of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act. 


pwalker on PRODPC60 with PROPOSALS
59032 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 194 / Friday, October 6, 2006 / Proposed Rules 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71 

Airspace, Incorporated by reference, 

Navigation (air). 

The Proposed Amendment 

Accordingly, pursuant to the 

authority delegated to me, the Federal 

Aviation Administration proposes to 

amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows: 

PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, 

CLASS B, CLASS C, CLASS D, AND 

CLASS E AIRSPACE AREAS; 

AIRWAYS; ROUTES; AND REPORTING 

POINTS 

1. The authority citation for part 71 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 

40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–

1963 Comp., p. 389. 

§ 71.1 [Amended] 

2. The incorporation by reference in 

14 CFR 71.1 of the Federal Aviation 

Administration Order 7400.9N, 

Airspace Designations and Reporting 

Points, dated September 1, 2005, and 

effective September 16, 2005, is 

amended as follows: 

* * * * * 

Paragraph 6005 Class E airspace areas 

extending upward from 700 feet or more 

above the surface of the earth. 

* * * * * 

AGL WI E5 Hayward, WI [Revised] 

Sawyer County Airport, WI 

(Lat. 46°01′31′′ N., long .91°26′39′′ W.) 

Hayward VOR/DME 

(Lat. 46°01′08′′ N., long. 91°26′47′′ W.) 

That airspace extending upward from 700 

feet above the surface within a 6.5-mile 

radius of the Sawyer County Airport, and 

within 4.0 miles each side of the Hayward 

VOR/DME 025° radial extending from the 

6.5-mile radius to 11.8 miles northeast of the 

VOR/DME 

* * * * * 

Issued in Ft. Worth, Texas on September 

14, 2006. 

Donald R. Smith, 

Manager, System Support Group, ATO 

Central Service Area. 

[FR Doc. 06–8314 Filed 10–5–06; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–M 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Bureau of Industry and Security 

15 CFR Parts 715, 716, and 721 

[Docket No. 060831231–6231–01] 

RIN 0694–AD53 

Chemical Weapons Convention 

Regulations: UDOC ‘‘Change in 

Inspection Status Form;’’ Amendments 

to Records Review and Recordkeeping 

Requirements 

AGENCY: Bureau of Industry and 

Security, Commerce. 

ACTION: Proposed rule and request for 

comments. 

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Industry and 

Security (BIS) is publishing this 

proposed rule to amend the Chemical 

Weapons Convention Regulations 

(CWCR) to expedite the collection of 

information concerning the inspection 

status of plant sites that produce 

unscheduled discrete organic chemicals 

(UDOCs) subject to the declaration 

requirements of the CWCR, to clarify the 

scope of the CWCR records review and 

recordkeeping requirements, and to 

update the maximum civil penalty that 

may be imposed for violations of the 

CWCR restrictions on imports of CWC 

Schedule 1 and Schedule 2 chemicals. 

The CWCR include requirements to 

declare certain activities, involving 

scheduled chemicals and UDOCs, and 

to provide access for on-site verification 

by international inspectors of certain 

declared facilities in the United States. 

Specifically, this proposed rule would 

amend the CWCR by revising the annual 

declaration requirements for UDOCs to 

allow a ‘‘declared’’ plant site currently 

subject to inspection, which anticipates 

that its production of UDOCs during the 

current calendar year will be below the 

inspection threshold level indicated in 

the CWCR, to submit a Change in 

Inspection Status Form to BIS by 

December 15th of the current calendar 

year. In addition, any such UDOC plant 

site containing at least one plant that 

anticipates producing an individual PSF 

chemical (i.e., a UDOC containing the 

elements phosphorus, sulfur or fluorine) 

in quantities that exceed the declaration 

threshold for such chemicals would 

have the option of submitting its Annual 

Declaration on Past Activities, in lieu of 

a Change in Inspection Status Form, by 

December 15th of the current calendar 

year. Otherwise, the CWCR require that 

the Annual Declaration on Past 

Activities be submitted by February 

28th of the following year. The 

information provided to BIS, as a result 

of this change, would ensure that the 

plant site would not be subject to 

inspection during the first 90 days of the 

next calendar year (i.e., the year after the 

UDOC activities took place), which is 

the period when the United States 

compiles its annual declaration on past 

activities for submission to the 

Organization for the Prohibition of 

Chemical Weapons (OPCW). In 

addition, this information would 

strengthen the verification regime of the 

CWC by allowing the OPCW to schedule 

inspections, on a year-round basis, of 

those UDOC facilities in the United 

States that meet or exceed the 

inspection threshold level indicated in 

the CWCR. 

This proposed rule would also amend 

the CWCR by revising the records 

review provisions to clarify that a 

facility must provide the OPCW 

Inspection Team with access to all 

supporting materials and 

documentation used by the facility to 

prepare declarations and to otherwise 

comply with the CWCR, including 

records related to activities that have 

taken place at the facility since the 

beginning of the previous calendar year 

(i.e., up to and including the date of the 

inspection), even if the facility has not 

submitted its current year Annual 

Declaration on Past Activities to BIS at 

the time the inspection takes place. 

In addition, this rule would revise the 

CWCR records review and 

recordkeeping requirements to clarify 

that the types of records that are subject 

to these requirements include all 

supporting materials and 

documentation associated with the 

movement into, around, and from the 

facility of declared chemicals and their 

feedstock or any product chemicals 

formed from such chemicals and 

feedstock. The purpose of this 

clarification would be to ensure that the 

CWCR records review and 

recordkeeping requirements fully 

conform with the inspection aims 

described in the inspection provisions 

of the CWCR, which include verifying 

the absence of Schedule 1 chemicals 

and the non-diversion of Schedule 1 

and Schedule 2 chemicals. 

Finally, this rule would amend the 

enforcement provisions of the CWCR to 

increase the maximum civil penalty that 

may be imposed for violations of the 

CWCR restrictions on imports of CWC 

Schedule 1 or Schedule 2 chemicals 

from $11,000 to $50,000 to reflect 

amendments to the International 

Emergency Economic Powers Act 

(IEEPA) made by the USA PATRIOT 

Improvement and Reauthorization Act 

of 2005, which was enacted on March 

9, 2006. 


pwalker on PRODPC60 with PROPOSALS