alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 32.2311 Station apparatus. ( a ) This account shall include the original cost of station apparatus, including teletypewriter equipment, telephone and miscellaneous equipment, small private branch exchanges and radio equipment (excluding mobile), installed for customer's use. Items included in this account shall remain herein until finally disposed of or until used in such manner as to warrant inclusion in other accounts.
( b ) Each company shall prepare a list of station apparatus which shall be used as its list of disposition units for this account, the cost of which when finally disposed of shall be credited to this account and charged to Account 3100, Accumulated Depreciation.
( c ) The cost of cross-connection boxes, distributing frames or other distribution points which are installed to terminate intrabuilding network cable shall be charged to Account 2426, Intrabuilding Network Cable.
( d ) Operator head sets and transmitters in central offices and at private branch exchanges, and test sets such as those used by wire chiefs, outside plant technicians, and others, shall be included in Account 2114, Tools and other work equipment, Account 2220, Operator systems, or Account 2341, Large Private Branch Exchanges, as appropriate.
( e ) Station apparatus for company official use shall be included in Account 2123, Office Equipment.
( f ) Periodic asset verification, as prescribed by generally accepted accounting principles, shall be taken of all station apparatus in stock that are included in this account. The number of such station apparatus items as determined by this verification together with the number of all other station apparatus items included in this account, shall be compared with the corresponding number of station apparatus items as shown by the respective control records. The original cost of any unreconciled differences thereby disclosed shall be adjusted through Account 3100, Accumulated Depreciation. Appropriate verifications shall be made at suitable intervals and necessary adjustments between this account and Account 3100 shall be made for all station apparatus included in this account.
( g ) Items of station apparatus in stock for which no further use in the ordinary conduct of the business is contemplated, but which as a precautionary measure are held for possible future contingencies instead of being discarded shall be excluded from this account and included in Account 1220, Inventories.
( h ) Embedded CPE is that equipment or inventory which was tariffed or otherwise subject to the jurisdictional separations process as of January 1, 1983.
[51 FR 43499, Dec. 2, 1986, as amended at 52 FR 6561, Mar. 4, 1987; 52 FR 39535, Oct. 22, 1987; 59 FR 46930, Sept. 13, 1994; 64 FR 50007, Sept. 15, 1999; 67 FR 5687, Feb. 6, 2002]
Editorial Note on Part 97
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 97 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

§ 97.7 Control operator required. When transmitting, each amateur station must have a control operator. The control operator must be a person: ( a ) For whom an amateur operator/primary station license grant appears on the ULS consolidated licensee database, or
( b ) Who is authorized for alien reciprocal operation by § 97.107 of this part.
[63 FR 68978, Dec. 14, 1998]
§ 402.13 Informal consultation. ( a ) Informal consultation is an optional process that includes all discussions, correspondence, etc., between the Service and the Federal agency or the designated non-Federal representative, designed to assist the Federal agency in determining whether formal consultation or a conference is required.
( b ) During informal consultation, the Service may suggest modifications to the action that the Federal agency and any applicant could implement to avoid the likelihood of adverse effects to listed species or critical habitat.
( c ) If during informal consultation it is determined by the Federal agency, with the written concurrence of the Service, that the action is not likely to adversely affect listed species or critical habitat, the consultation process is terminated, and no further action is necessary. ( 1 ) A written request for concurrence with a Federal agency's not likely to adversely affect determination shall include information similar to the types of information described for formal consultation at § 402.14(c)(1) sufficient for the Service to determine if it concurs.
( 2 ) Upon receipt of a written request consistent with paragraph (c)(1) of this section, the Service shall provide written concurrence or non-concurrence with the Federal agency's determination within 60 days. The 60-day timeframe may be extended upon mutual consent of the Service, the Federal agency, and the applicant (if involved), but shall not exceed 120 days total from the date of receipt of the Federal agency's written request consistent with paragraph (c)(1) of this section.
[74 FR 20423, May 4, 2009, as amended at 84 FR 45016, Aug. 27, 2019]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### General Services Administration

###### National Aeronautics and Space Administration

          - 48 CFR Parts 16 and 39
          - [FAR Case 2003-008]
          - RIN 9000-AJ74; Docket 2006-0015

# AGENCIES:

Department of Defense (DoD), General Services Administration (GSA), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).

# ACTION:

Proposed rule; withdrawal.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Civilian Agency Acquisition Council and the Defense Acquisition Regulations Council (Councils) have agreed to withdraw the proposed rule, FAR case 2003-008, Share-in-Savings Contracting, which was published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on July 2, 2004. The rule proposed amending the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) as it pertains to types of contracts and acquisition of information technology to address the inclusion of Share-in-Savings (SIS) contracting. However, the SIS concept was not reauthorized by Congress.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For clarification of content, contact Mr. Kenneth Buck at (202) 219-0311. Please cite FAR case 2003-008. For information pertaining to status or publication schedules, contact the FAR Secretariat, Room 4035, GS Building, Washington, DC 20405, (202) 501-4755.

Dated: January 24, 2006.

Gerald Zaffos,

Director, Contract Policy Division.

[FR Doc. 06-816 Filed 1-27-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6820-EP-S
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Glacier Bancorp, Inc.
Kalispell, Montana

We consent to the inclusion by reference in the registration statements on Forms
S-8 (Files No. 333-105995 and No. 333-36514) and registration statement on Form
S-3 (File No. 333-154968) of our report dated March 1, 2010 on our audits of the
consolidated statements of financial condition as of December 31, 2009 and 2008,
and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and
comprehensive income and cash flows for the three years then ended of Glacier
Bancorp, Inc. We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our report
dated March 1, 2010, on the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting of Glacier Bancorp, Inc. as of December 31, 2009.


                                        /s/ BKD, LLP

Denver, Colorado
March 12, 2010
EPA R eg . N o

. 400

- 505
§ 296.6 NMFS processing of claims. ( a ) *Action by NMFS.* Upon receipt of a claim, the Chief, FSD, will: ( 1 ) Send an abstract of the claim to the Secretary of the Interior;
( 2 ) Send the reported location of any obstruction which was not recovered and retained to the National Ocean Survey, which will inform the Defense Mapping Agency Hydrographic/Topographic Center.
( b ) *Actions by the Interior Department.* Upon receipt of an abstract of a claim, the Interior Department will immediately: ( 1 ) Plot the casualty site, and advise NMFS whether the site is in an area affected by OCS activities;
( 2 ) make reasonable efforts to notify all persons known to have engaged in activities associated with OCS energy activity in the vicinity where the damage or loss occurred.
( c ) *Responses to notice of claim.* ( 1 ) Each person notified by the Interior Department will, within thirty days after receipt of the notice, advise the Chief, FSD, and the Interior Department whether he admits or denies responsibility for the damages claimed.
( 2 ) Each person notified by the Interior Department who fails to give timely and proper advice of admission or denial of responsibility shall be presumed to deny responsibility for the damages claimed.
( 3 ) If any person admits responsibility, the Chief, FSD, will initiate action to recover from that party any sums paid or to be paid for the claimed damages.
( 4 ) Any person referred to in this section, including lessees or permittees or their contractors or subcontractors, may submit evidence about any claim to the Chief, FSD.
( d ) *Failure to meet filing requirements.* The Chief, FSD, may reject any claim that does not meet the filing requirements. The Chief, FSD, will give a claimant whose claim is rejected written notice of the reasons for rejection within 30 days after the date on which the claim was filed. If the claimant does not refile an acceptable claim within 30 days after the date of this written notice, the claimant is not eligible for Fund compensation unless there are extenuating circumstances.
( e ) *Proceedings* — ( 1 ) *Location.* Any required proceeding will be conducted within such United States judicial district as may be mutually agreeable to the claimant and the Assistant Administrator, NMFS, or his designee, or if no agreement can be reached, within the United States judicial district in which the claimant's home port is located.
( 2 ) *Powers.* For purposes of any proceeding, the Assistant Administrator, NMFS, or his designee, shall have the power to administer oaths and subpoena witnesses and the production of books, records, and other evidence relative to the issues involved.
( 3 ) *Amendments to claims.* A claimant may amend the claim at any time before the Chief, FSD, issues an initial determination.
( 4 ) *Criminal penalty for fraudulent claims.* Any person who files a fraudulent claim is subject to prosecution under 18 U.S.C. sections 287 and 1001, each of which, upon conviction, imposes a penalty of not more than a $10,000 fine and 5 years' imprisonment, or both.
[47 FR 49600, Nov. 1, 1982, as amended at 61 FR 6322, Feb. 20, 1996]
* Senior Judge Hall participated in the consideration of this

case but died prior to the time the decision was filed. The

decision is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 46(d).

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-4715

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

WILLIAM F. PRIOR, M.D.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Aiken. Charles E. Simons, Jr., Senior District

Judge. (CR-97-1048)

Submitted: May 28, 1999 Decided: September 23, 1999

Before WIDENER and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HALL,* Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William F. Prior, Appellant Pro Se. Eric William Ruschky, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for

Appellee.
2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

William Prior appeals the district court’s judgment and resulting sentence entered pursuant to a guilty plea for dispensing

a controlled substance with an expired Drug Enforcement Administration registration number in violation of 21 U.S.C.A. §§

843(a)(2), (d)(1) (West Supp. 1999), and 18 U.S.C. § 2 (1994).

Prior argues that the court erred in accepting his guilty plea. We

find that the court fully complied with Fed. R. Crim. P. 11 and

properly determined that Prior’s guilty plea was knowing and

voluntary. See North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25 (1970);

United States v. DeFusco, 949 F.2d 114, 116-17 (4th Cir. 1991).

Accordingly, we affirm Prior’s conviction and sentence. We deny

Prior’s motion to “remand request for amendment of transcript.” We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 
 Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350)
 
 
 Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350), the
undersigned, Guy J. Quigley, the Chief Executive Officer of The Quigley
Corporation, a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to his
knowledge, that:
 
 The
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 of the Company
(the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.
 
 
 
 /s/  Guy
      J. QuigleyGuy
      J. QuigleyChief
      Executive OfficerMarch
      7, 2008
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

In re: ) Case No. 

)

) Chapter 13 

)

SSN: XXX-XX- Debtors )

To:

ORDER TO EMPLOYER TO PAY THE TRUSTEE 

Attn: Payroll Department 

WHEREAS, the above named debtor has a plan to pay his/her debts out of his/her future earnings,

and by his/her plan submits all of his/her future earnings to the supervision and control of this Court for the

purpose of carrying out the Plan:

NOW IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, that until further order of this Court, ,

employer of , deduct from the earnings of the debtor the sum of $

each month beginning on the next pay day following the receipt of this order and to pay the sum so deducted to ,

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the employer shall stop or change the deduction upon written notice from the

Trustee;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the employer shall notify the Trustee if the employment of the debtor is

terminated and the reason for such termination; 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that all earnings of the debtor, except amounts required to be withheld by the

provisions of Federal or State law or for insurance, pension or union dues, be paid to the debtor and that no

deduction other than authorized or directed by this order be made by the employer. 

Date 

Entered: 

Jeffrey Allsteadt, Clerk, United States Bankruptcy Court 

Attorney Signature ______________________ Date:

Check this box if the debtor has agreed to the entry of this order without further notice or hearing through Section 

I of the Chapter 13 Plan.

Monica D Scott 16-27660

3958

AMENDED

BNSF Logistics

2710 S. 48th Street

Springdale, AR 72762

BNSF Logistics

Monica D Scott 503.00

11/29/2018

Allsteadt Clerk United States Ban

11-30-2018

Case 16-27660 Doc 34 Filed 11/30/18 Entered 11/30/18 11:02:15 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-6611

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus BARRY EARL WILLIAMS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (2:95-cr-00101-RGD; 2:97-cv-00840-RGD) Submitted: August 31, 2006 Decided: September 7, 2006 Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Barry Earl Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Howard Jacob Zlotnick, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Barry Earl Williams seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing a motion to amend his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Williams has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### United States Arctic Research Commission

Notice is hereby given that the U.S. Arctic Research Commission will hold its 81st meeting in Woods Hole, MA on October 10-11, 2006. The Business Session, open to the public, will convene at 8 a.m., Tuesday, October 10, 2006. An Executive Session will follow adjournment of the Business Session.

The Agenda items include:

(1) Call to order and approval of the Agenda.

(2) Approval of the Minutes of the 80th Meeting.

(3) Reports from Congressional Liaisons.

(4) Agency Reports.

The focus of the meeting will be reports and updates on programs and research projects affecting the Arctic.

Any person planning to attend this meeting who requires special accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those needs.

Contact Person for More Information: John Farrell, Executive Director, U.S. Arctic Research Commission, 703-525-0111 or TDD 703-306-0090.

John Farrell,

Executive Director.

[FR Doc. 06-7702  Filed 9-12-06; 12:23 pm]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### July 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice


### 130596 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan 

### PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices



### v SC: 130596 COA: 266871 Wayne CC: 05-001427-02 KEVIN DERRELL WILEY, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the January 5, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

t0724 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 31, 2006

Clerk
ODP Information Bulletin
                  No. 00-21   October 26, 2000


          TO:       All State Administrative Agency Heads
          All State Administrative Agency Points of Contact

          FROM:     C.H. Straub, II
          Director

          SUBJECT:  Emergency Response to Terrorism: Job Aid


The Office for Domestic Preparedness Support (ODP), the Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA), the United States Fire Administration (USFA), and the National Fire
Academy (NFA) have designed and produced a comprehensive document intended to support training
messages of the Emergency Response to Terrorism NFA curriculum.

The Job Aid is designed to assist the first responder from the Fire, EMS, HazMat, and Law
Enforcement disciplines.  This includes both tactical and strategic issues that range from line
personnel to unit officers and up to and including the Incident Commander.  There are five primary
sections that are covered (each tabbed and color coded for rapid access of information): Introduction,
Operational Considerations, Incident-Specific Actions, Agency Related Issues, and the Glossary.

The document is not a training manual.  It is expected that personnel already have appropriate training
and experience to address the identified tactics.  It should serve as a reminder for those who already
have completed the appropriate level of tactical or strategic training, such as the Emergency Response
to Terrorism courses developed for classroom and self-study.

The document is designed to assist emergency response personnel in identifying a possible
terrorist/WMD incident and implementing initial actions.  The document identifies both strategic and
tactical considerations that should be assessed within the first hour of an incident.  Appropriate tactics
would then be implemented as required.

To order the ERT: JA, it is available in limited numbers (up to five each to response organizations,
one to individuals) from the NFA Publications or in bulk quantities from the Government Printing
Office through Alan Ptak at (202) 512-1709.  Mr. Ptak's e-mail address is aptak@gpo.gov.  The
stock number is 064-000-00027.
#### § 80.765 Effective radiated power.

Effective radiated power is used in computing the service area contour. The effective radiated power is derived from the transmitter output power, loss in the transmission system including duplexers, cavities, circulators, switches and filters, and the gain relative to a half-wave dipole of the antenna system.