alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 16-27918 Doc 5 Filed 08/31/16 Entered 08/31/16 11:06:25 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2
Case 16-27918 Doc 5 Filed 08/31/16 Entered 08/31/16 11:06:25 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2
###### Editorial Note on Part 660

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 660 appear at 67 FR 65906, Oct. 29, 2002, 88 FR 81358, Nov. 22, 2023.

#### § 660.320 Open access fishery—crossover provisions.

The crossover provisions listed at § 660.60(h)(7), apply to vessels fishing in the open access fishery.

[76 FR 74747, Dec. 1, 2011]
# EUR-Lex - 11957A055 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11957A055

**TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN ATOMIC ENERGY COMMUNITY ( E.A.E.C. - EURATOM ), TITLE TWO - PROVISIONS FOR THE ENCOURAGEMENT OF PROGRESS IN THE FIELD OF NUCLEAR ENERGY, CHAPTER VI: SUPPLIES, SECTION I: THE AGENCY, ARTICLE 55 **

*

*

++++

ARTICLE 55

THE MEMBER STATES SHALL COMMUNICATE OR CAUSE TO BE COMMUNICATED TO THE AGENCY ALL THE INFORMATION NECESSARY TO ENABLE IT TO EXERCISE ITS RIGHT OF OPTION AND ITS EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TO CONCLUDE SUPPLY CONTRACTS .
# EUR-Lex - 12002E227 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 12002E227

**Treaty establishing the European Community (Nice consolidated version) - Part Five: Institutions of the Community - Title I: Provisions governing the institutions - Chapter 1: The institutions - Section 4: The Court of Justice - Article 227 - Article 170 - EC Treaty (Maastricht consolidated version) - Article 170 - EEC Treaty **

*
Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0125 - 0125 Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0271 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0061 - Consolidated version (EEC Treaty - no official publication available) *

Treaty establishing the European Community (Nice consolidated version)

Part Five: Institutions of the Community

Title I: Provisions governing the institutions

Chapter 1: The institutions

Section 4: The Court of Justice

Article 227

Article 170 - EC Treaty (Maastricht consolidated version)

Article 170 - EEC Treaty

Article 227

A Member State which considers that another Member State has failed to fulfil an obligation under this Treaty may bring the matter before the Court of Justice.

Before a Member State brings an action against another Member State for an alleged infringement of an obligation under this Treaty, it shall bring the matter before the Commission.

The Commission shall deliver a reasoned opinion after each of the States concerned has been given the opportunity to submit its own case and its observations on the other party's case both orally and in writing.

If the Commission has not delivered an opinion within three months of the date on which the matter was brought before it, the absence of such opinion shall not prevent the matter from being brought before the Court of Justice.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1


                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


The Board of Directors
Hollinger International Inc.:


We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements No.
333-17111 on Form S-3 and No. 33-88810 on Form S-8 of Hollinger International
Inc. of our report dated February 25, 1999 relating to the consolidated balance
sheets of Hollinger International Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1998
and 1997, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive
income, stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 1998, which report appears in the December
31, 1998 annual report on Form 10-K of Hollinger International Inc.

                                                           /s/ KPMG LLP /s/

Chicago, Illinois
March 31, 1999
**Exhibit 99.5**

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-199916 on Form F-10, Registration Statement No. 333-186874 on Form F-3 and Registration Statement No. 333-181463 on Form S-8 and to the use of our reports dated February 12, 2015 relating to the consolidated financial statements of TELUS Corporation and the effectiveness of TELUS Corporation’s internal controls over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 40-F of TELUS Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2014.

 

 
| *“Deloitte   LLP”* |   |
|------------------------------|--------|
| Chartered   Accountants      |   |
| Vancouver,   Canada          |   |
| March 19,   2015        |   |

 

----
1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION

WASHINGTON, DC

IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION FOR EXEMPTION OF:

Allen Confidential Investigations Agency

FOR AN EXEMPTION SEEKING RELIEF FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF

TITLE14 OF THE CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATION

SECTIONS 61.113{a) & {b), 91.7{a), 91.121, 91.151{b), 91.405{a), 91.407{a){1), 91.409{a){1) & {a){2),

AND 91.417{a) & {b) CONCERNING COMMERCIAL OPERATION OF THE

1. DJI Phantom 3

2. DJI Phantom Vision 2

UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS

PURSUANT TO SECTION 333 OF

THE FAA MODERNIZATION AND REFORM ACT OF 2012 {PUBLIC LAW 112-95)

2

TABLE OF CONTENTS

page

Glossary of Abbreviations ....................................................... 3

Summary ........................................................................... 4

Introduction and Interests of Petitioner ....................................... 4

Background ........................................................................ 4

Basis for Petition .................................................................. 4

Name and Address of Petitioner ................................................ 5

Specific sections of 14 C.F.R from which Allen Confidential Investigations

Agency seeks Exemption ......................................................... 5

The extent of relief Allen Confidential Investigations Agency seeks relief and the

reason Allen Confidential Investigations Agency seeks relief..................... 7
The reasons why granting Allen Confidential Investigations Agency’s request

would be in the public’s interest............................................. 8

The reasons why granting the exemptions would not adversely affect

Safety......................................................................... 10

Summary that can be published in the Federal Register............... 19

Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support

Allen Confidential Investigations Agency’s request..................... 19

Conclusion............................................................ 19
§ 29.142 Will I be charged a fee for emergency access to my operations? No. ( a ) The Service will not charge a fee for access across Service-administered lands or waters beyond the scope of your oil and gas right as necessary to respond to an emergency situation at your area of operations if we determine after the fact that the circumstances required an immediate response to either: ( 1 ) Prevent or minimize injury to refuge resources; or
( 2 ) Ensure public health and safety.
( b ) You will remain liable for any damage caused to refuge resources as a result of such emergency access.
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed November 30, 2022.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D21-1678

Lower Tribunal No. F93-15569A

________________

Terrio Knight,

Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from 

the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Teresa Mary Pooler, Judge.

O’Brien Hatfield Reese, P.A., and Rachael E. Reese (Tampa), for 

appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Katryna Santa Cruz, Assistant 

Attorney General, for appellee.

Before SCALES, LINDSEY and GORDO, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Your session is about to expire.Resume session

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Welcome.Log inorregisterCOPS OFFICE RESOURCE CENTER

HomeCatalogCartOrders

                    

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                CatalogMatches: 1Offline form Recent Popular Online Print OtherCOPS-P207The Methamphetamine Summit: A Process in Collaboration and Decision MakingThe Methamphetamine Summit: A Process in Collaboration and Decision Making brings together the history of an innovative process and an overview of the lessons learned by Jim and Colleen Copple's over a decade of work building state and local collaborations to address the problems of meth. With an emphasis on cross-disciplinary collaboration and participatory research, the Summit Approach is a case study for improved solutions to complex drug problems and holds promise for addressing a wider range of drugs in communities across the country.By Heidi DeutschCategories: Nonviolent CrimeLanguage: EnglishLow stockPublic linkhttps://portal.cops.usdoj.gov/resourcecenter?item=cops-p207Click here to see the entire catalog.Cart:Download PDFBook • Jul 2011Search catalogreset title abstract authors contentContaining text: exact phraseNot containing text: exact phraseLanguage:anyEnglishSpanishHmongVietnameseCategory:anyAlternatives to IncarcerationCommunity PartnershipsData and AnalysisEthics and IntegrityFoundations of Community PolicingHiring, Recruitment, and RetentionHomeland SecurityNew Immigrant CommunitiesNonviolent CrimeOtherPolice OperationsPOP Center ResourceSchool and Campus SafetyTechnologyTribalViolent CrimeYouth SafetyPublished after:Published before:Page1

                    

FOIA | No FEAR Act | Open Government | Privacy | Legal|HelpCopyright (C) U.S. Department of Justice, COPS Office, IT Division, 2012 - 2024. All rights reserved.
Rendered on Mon Mar 4 2024 at 05:55 (UTC-5) in 0.19 secEnterprise Framework 3.21.7.7 • Store Controls 3.3.1.7Survey 500303407 Section 60000560 Rules Hints Inactive
Fn I.,' 

~0r"; . , ;,... ~ 

L,.,. • · ~· - I !;;,1 II : 5 9 

BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

In the Matter of 

American Conservative Union, et al.: 

Circulation of Discovery Documents 

) 

) MUR6920 

) 

) 

CERTIFICATION 

I, Laura E. Sinram, Acting Deputy Secretary of the Federal Election 

Commission, do hereby certify that on August 09, 2017, the Commission 

decided by a vote of 5-0 to approve the Subpoenas to Produce Documents and 

Orders to Submit Written Answers for Incentive Discretionary Trust, Axiom 

Strategies, and Jeff Roe, as recommended in the Memorandum from the Acting 

General Counsel dated August 4, 2017. 

Commissioners Goodman, Hunter, Petersen, Walther, and Weintraub voted 

affirmatively for the decision. 

Date 

Attest: 

Acting Deputy Secretary of the 

Commission
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 183 (Thursday, September 21, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 55225]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-7890]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards; Meeting of the 
Subcommittee on Plant License Renewal; Notice of Meeting

    The ACRS Subcommittee on Plant License Renewal will hold a meeting 
on October 3, 2006, Room T-2B3, 11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville, 
Maryland.
    The entire meeting will be open to public attendance.
    The agenda for the subject meeting shall be as follows:
    Tuesday, October 3, 2006--1:30 p.m. until 5 p.m.
    The purpose of this meeting is to discuss the License Renewal 
Application for Oyster Creek and the associated Safety Evaluation 
Report (SER) with Open Items prepared by the NRR staff. The 
Subcommittee will hear presentations by and hold discussions with 
representatives of the NRC staff, AmerGen Energy Company, and other 
interested persons regarding this matter. The Subcommittee will gather 
information, analyze relevant issues and facts, and formulate proposed 
positions and actions, as appropriate, for deliberation by the full 
Committee.
    Members of the public desiring to provide oral statements and/or 
written comments should notify the Designated Federal Official, Mr. 
Cayetano Santos (telephone 301/415-7270) five days prior to the 
meeting, if possible, so that appropriate arrangements can be made. 
Electronic recordings will be permitted.
    Further information regarding this meeting can be obtained by 
contacting the Designated Federal Official between 7:30 a.m. and 4:15 
p.m. (ET). Persons planning to attend this meeting are urged to contact 
the above named individual at least two working days prior to the 
meeting to be advised of any potential changes to the agenda.

    Dated: September 15, 2006.
David C. Fischer,
Acting Branch Chief, ACRS/ACNW.
[FR Doc. 06-7890 Filed 9-20-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
```

[108th Congress Public Law 127]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ127.108]

[[Page 117 STAT. 1354]]

Public Law 108-127
108th Congress

                                 An Act

 
    To amend title XXI of the Social Security Act to make technical 
        corrections with respect to the definition of qualifying 
             State. <<NOTE: Nov. 17, 2003 -  [H.R. 3288]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS RELATING TO THE DEFINITION OF 
            QUALIFYING STATE UNDER TITLE XXI OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ACT.

    Effective as if included in the enactment of Public Law 108-74, 
section 2105(g)(2) of the Social Security Act, as added by section 1(b) 
of such Act, <<NOTE: Ante, p. 895.>> is amended--
            (1) by striking ``185'' the first place it appears and 
        inserting ``184'';
            (2) by inserting ``August 1, 1994, or'' before ``July 1, 
        1995''; and
            (3) by inserting before the period at the end the following: 
        ``, or, in the case of a State that had a statewide waiver in 
        effect under section 1115 with respect to title XIX that was 
        first implemented on October 1, 1993, had an income eligibility 
        standard under such waiver for children that was at least 185 
        percent of the poverty line and on and after July 1, 1998, has 
        an income eligibility standard for children under section 
        1902(a)(10)(A) or a statewide waiver in effect under section 
        1115 with respect to title XIX that is at least 185 percent of 
        the poverty line''.

    Approved November 17, 2003.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 3288 (S. 1547):
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 149 (2003):
            Oct. 20, considered and passed House.
            Oct. 31, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
#### § 24.1 Purpose of regulations.

The regulations contained in this part are for the purpose of establishing ports for the importation, exportation and reexportation of plants.
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4972

To amend the Public Buildings Act of 1959 to ensure that any lease entered

into by a Federal agency for office, meeting, storage, and other space

necessary to carry out the functions of the Federal agency shall be

subject to the leasing requirements of the Public Buildings Act of 1959.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 16, 1994

Mr. TRAFICANT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Public Works and Transportation

A BILL

To amend the Public Buildings Act of 1959 to ensure that

any lease entered into by a Federal agency for office,

meeting, storage, and other space necessary to carry

out the functions of the Federal agency shall be subject

to the leasing requirements of the Public Buildings Act

of 1959.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That section 7 of the Public Buildings Act of 1959 (40

4 U.S.C. 606) is amended by adding at the end the follow5 ing:
2

•HR 4972 IH

1 ‘‘(g) APPLICABILITY TO LEASES OF FEDERAL AGEN2 CIES.—The provisions of this section and sections 11 and

3 12 of this Act shall apply to any lease of space by a Fed4 eral agency in the same manner and to the same extent

5 as such provisions would apply if such space were being

6 leased by the Administrator; except that certain functions

7 which the Administrator would carry out under such pro8 visions if such space were being leased by the Adminis9 trator shall be carried out by the Federal agency.’’.

Æ
Adams, Kevin (OST) 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject: 

Hi Kevin, 

Dan Owen <dan@flyAAT.com> 

Monday, March 11, 2013 4:56 PM 

Adams, Kevin (OST) 

Tatitlek EAS deadline extension 

J & M Alaska Air Tours, Inc, dba Alaska Air Transit is interested in the Tatitlek EAS proposal. Due to 

our current workload related to the acquisition and implementation of a new Cessna Grand Caravan EX 

aircraft, we request a two week extension on the deadline to submit a bid. 

Thank you, 

VCL¥\1 Owerv 

Owner/ operator 

Alaska Air Transit 

907-276-5422 

http://www.flyAA T.com 

..... 

!,. ... : 

,.,_, 

1
# EUR-Lex - 12004V227 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V227

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART III — THE POLICIES AND FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - TITLE III — INTERNAL POLICIES AND ACTION - CHAPTER III — POLICIES IN OTHER AREAS - Section 4 — Agriculture and fisheries - Article III-227 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0100 - 0100 *

Article III-227

1. The objectives of the common agricultural policy shall be:

(a) to increase agricultural productivity by promoting technical progress and by ensuring the rational development of agricultural production and the optimum utilisation of the factors of production, in particular labour;

(b) thus to ensure a fair standard of living for the agricultural community, in particular by increasing the individual earnings of persons engaged in agriculture;

(c) to stabilise markets;

(d) to assure the availability of supplies;

(e) to ensure that supplies reach consumers at reasonable prices.

2. In working out the common agricultural policy and the special methods for its application, account shall be taken of:

(a) the particular nature of agricultural activity, which results from the social structure of agriculture and from structural and natural disparities between the various agricultural regions;

(b) the need to effect the appropriate adjustments by degrees;

(c) the fact that in the Member States agriculture constitutes a sector closely linked with the economy as a whole.

--------------------------------------------------
#### § 665.201 Definitions.

As used in §§ 665.200 through 665.219:

*Deep 7 bottomfish* means the following species:

| Local name | Common name | Scientific name |
| --- | --- | --- |
| (1) lehi | silver jaw jobfish | *Aphareus rutilans*. |
| (2) ehu | squirrelfish snapper | *Etelis carbunculus*. |
| (3) onaga | longtail snapper | *Etelis coruscans*. |
| (4) hapuupuu | sea bass | *Hyporthodus quernus*. |
| (5) opakapaka | pink snapper | *Pristipomoides filamentosus*. |
| (6) kalekale | pink snapper | *Pristipomoides sieboldii*. |
| (7) gindai | snapper | *Pristipomoides zonatus*. |

*Deep 7 bottomfish fishing year* means the year beginning at 0001 local time on September 1 and ending at 2400 HST on August 31 of the next calendar year.

*Hawaii bottomfish ecosystem component species (Hawaii bottomfish ECS)* means those species that are not listed as Hawaii bottomfish MUS and that are identified as ECS in Table 4 of the Hawaii FEP.

*Hawaii bottomfish management unit species (Hawaii bottomfish MUS)* means the following species:

| Local name | Common name | Scientific name |
| --- | --- | --- |
| (1) lehi | silver jaw jobfish | *Aphareus rutilans*. |
| (2) uku | gray jobfish | *Aprion virescens*. |
| (3) ehu | squirrelfish snapper | *Etelis carbunculus*. |
| (4) onaga | longtail snapper | *Etelis coruscans*. |
| (5) hapuupuu | sea bass | *Hyporthodus quernus*. |
| (6) opakapaka | pink snapper | *Pristipomoides filamentosus*. |
| (7) kalekale | pink snapper | *Pristipomoides sieboldii*. |
| (8) gindai | snapper | *Pristipomoides zonatus*. |

*Main Hawaiian Islands non-commercial bottomfish permit* means the permit required by § 665.203(a)(2) to own or fish from a vessel that is used in any non-commercial vessel-based fishing, landing, or transshipment of any Hawaii bottomfish MUS or ECS in the MHI Management Subarea.

*Protected species study zone* means the waters within 50 nm, as designated by the Regional Administrator pursuant to § 665.208, around the following islands of the NWHI and as measured from the following coordinates:

| Name | N. lat. | W. long. |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Nihoa Island | 23°05′ | 161°55′ |
| Necker Island | 23°35′ | 164°40′ |
| French Frigate Shoals | 23°45′ | 166°15′ |
| Gardner Pinnacles | 25°00′ | 168°00′ |
| Maro Reef | 25°25′ | 170°35′ |
| Laysan Island | 25°45′ | 171°45′ |
| Lisianski Island | 26°00′ | 173°55′ |
| Pearl and Hermes Reef | 27°50′ | 175°50′ |
| Midway Island | 28°14′ | 177°22′ |
| Kure Island | 28°25′ | 178°20′ |

*Seamount Groundfish* means the following species:

| Common name | Scientific name |
| --- | --- |
| Armorhead | *Pentaceros wheeleri.* |
| Alfonsin | *Beryx splendens.* |
| Raftfish | *Hyperoglyphe japonica.* |

[75 FR 2205, Jan. 14, 2010, as amended at 84 FR 2771, Feb. 8, 2019; 84 FR 29396, June 24, 2019]
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, John
F. Lanzafame, Chief Executive Officer of Biophan Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company"), certify to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 30, 2008 of the
Company, that:




(1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2) the
information contained in the Report, fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
      January 20, 2009/s/
      John F. LanzafameJohn
      F. Lanzafame
                  Chief
      Executive Officer