alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 76.502 Time limits applicable to franchise authority consideration of transfer applications. ( a ) A franchise authority shall have 120 days from the date of submission of a completed FCC Form 394, together with all exhibits, and any additional information required by the terms of the franchise agreement or applicable state or local law to act upon an application to sell, assign, or otherwise transfer controlling ownership of a cable system.
( b ) A franchise authority that questions the accuracy of the information provided under paragraph (a) must notify the cable operator within 30 days of the filing of such information, or such information shall be deemed accepted, unless the cable operator has failed to provide any additional information reasonably requested by the franchise authority within 10 days of such request.
( c ) If the franchise authority fails to act upon such transfer request within 120 days, such request shall be deemed granted unless the franchise authority and the requesting party otherwise agree to an extension of time.
[61 FR 15388, Apr. 8, 1996]
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20463

 MEMORANDUM

TO: The Commission

FROM: Office of Commission Secretary 

DATE: October 31, 2023 

SUBJECT: Ex Parte Communication Regarding Advisory 

Opinion Request 2023-06 (Texas Majority PAC) 

Transmitted herewith is an ex parte communication with Vice Chairman

Sean J. Cooksey regarding the above matter.

Attachment
From: Sean Cooksey

To: Commissioners Office; Commission Secretary Office; Lisa Stevenson; Lawrence Calvert; Neven Stipanovic; Robert

Knop; Lindsay Bird

Subject: FW: AOR 2023-6 (Texas Majority PAC)

Date: Tuesday, October 31, 2023 3:09:13 PM

Good afternoon,

I received the below ex parte communication via email with respect to AO 2023-06. I

have not responded and do not intend to.

Sean

From: Jon Berkon <jberkon@elias.law>

Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2023 1:58:35 PM

To: CommissionerCooksey (External) <CommissionerCooksey@fec.gov>

Subject: AOR 2023-6 (Texas Majority PAC)

Commissioner – hope you are well. As Commissioner Lindenbaum indicated, I was planning on

reaching out to additional Commissioners regarding the request. If you have a few minutes today, I’d

greatly appreciate it. I realize it’s a busy time of year.

Best regards,

Jon Berkon

Elias Law Group LLP

250 Massachusetts Ave NW, Suite 400

Washington DC 20001

W: 202-968-4511

jberkon@elias.law

CONFIDENTIAL: This email may contain privileged or confidential information and is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any

unauthorized use or disclosure of this communication is prohibited. If you believe that you have received this email in error, please notify

the sender immediately and delete it from your system.
Your session is about to expire.Resume session

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Welcome.Log inorregisterCOPS OFFICE RESOURCE CENTER

HomeCatalogCartOrders

                    

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                CatalogMatches: 1Offline form Recent Popular Online Print OtherCOPS-W0989Documenting and Advancing Promising Practices in Law Enforcement Victim Support: Agency Self-Assessment Tool for Law Enforcement Victim SupportVictim-centered, trauma-informed approaches to crime can support victim recovery and engagement with the criminal justice system. These approaches enhance victim and community safety while helping law enforcement solve and prevent crime. The Agency Self-Assessment Tool for Law Enforcement Victim Support is designed to assist law enforcement agencies in reviewing practices related to victim response - specifically the integration of victim-centered, trauma-informed practices into the overall operating philosophy and culture of the agency - through reviews of policy and practices and interviews with sworn and professional staff.By International Association of Chiefs of Police (IACP)Categories: Police OperationsLanguage: EnglishPublic linkhttps://portal.cops.usdoj.gov/resourcecenter?item=cops-w0989Click here to see the entire catalog.Cart:Download PDFBook • Feb 2023Search catalogreset title abstract authors contentContaining text: exact phraseNot containing text: exact phraseLanguage:anyEnglishSpanishHmongVietnameseCategory:anyAlternatives to IncarcerationCommunity PartnershipsData and AnalysisEthics and IntegrityFoundations of Community PolicingHiring, Recruitment, and RetentionHomeland SecurityNew Immigrant CommunitiesNonviolent CrimeOtherPolice OperationsPOP Center ResourceSchool and Campus SafetyTechnologyTribalViolent CrimeYouth SafetyPublished after:Published before:Page1

                    

FOIA | No FEAR Act | Open Government | Privacy | Legal|HelpCopyright (C) U.S. Department of Justice, COPS Office, IT Division, 2012 - 2024. All rights reserved.
Rendered on Mon Mar 4 2024 at 04:20 (UTC-5) in 0.88 secEnterprise Framework 3.21.7.7 • Store Controls 3.3.1.7Survey 500303407 Section 60000560 Rules Hints Inactive
#### § 665.240 Hawaii crustacean fisheries. [Reserved]
PUBLIC LAW 108–115—NOV. 11, 2003 117 STAT. 1329

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 2328:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 149 (2003):

July 21, considered and passed House.

Oct. 29, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 108–115

108th Congress

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 2001 East

Willard Street in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, as the ‘‘Robert A. Borski Post Office

Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The facility of the United States Postal Service located at

2001 East Willard Street in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, shall be

known and designated as the ‘‘Robert A. Borski Post Office

Building’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the facility referred to

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Robert

A. Borski Post Office Building’’.

Approved November 11, 2003.

Nov. 11, 2003

[H.R. 2328]
# FLYING FIREMAN, INC

26117 34 Th Avenue East, Spanaway, WA 98387 August 28 , 201 3

U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Operations, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12

– 140

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,

Washington, DC 20590

RE: Exemption from FAR 91

- 313 / Docket No. FAA

- 2011

- 1032 / Extension Request

Dear Mr. Glista:

Flying Fireman is certificated under Part 137 and operates a PBY

- 6A (N85U) , which has a restricted type

certificate for agriculture or firefighting purposes. (TC AR

- 22).

Flying Fireman was granted an exemption from Section 91.313(a) and (e) on December 16, 2011. The

exemption is will expire on December 31, 2013.

Flying Fireman is requesting that its exemption be extended an additional two years. There have been

no changes a t Flying Fireman. All the facts presented for the original exemption request are still

accurate today.

For further information, please contact me as follows:

Noel Rude

FLYING FIREMAN, INC.

26117 34 Th Avenue East

Spanaway, WA 98387

Phone: 614

- 774

- 0782

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me directly.

Regards,

FLYING FIREMAN, INC.

Noel Rude

President
#### § 665.598 Management area.

The PRIA fishery management area is the EEZ seaward of Palmyra Atoll, Kingman Reef, Jarvis Island, Baker Island, Howland Island, Johnston Atoll, and Wake Island, Pacific Remote Island Areas with the inner boundary a line coterminous with the seaward boundaries of the above atolls, reefs and islands PRIA and the outer boundary a line drawn in such a manner that each point on it is 200 nautical miles from the baseline from which the territorial sea is measured, or is coterminous with adjacent international maritime boundaries.
§ 86.41 How do I apply for a grant? ( a ) If you want to apply to be a subgrantee, you must send an application to the State agency that manages BIG following the rules given by your State. We award BIG funds only to States.
( b ) The director of your State agency (see § 86.10) or an authorized representative must certify all standard forms submitted in the grant application process in the format that we designate.
( c ) States must submit a grant application through *http://www.grants.gov .* The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) number for BIG is 15.622.
( d ) If your State supports Executive Order 12372, Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs, you must send copies of all standard forms and supporting information to the State Clearinghouse or Single Point of Contact identified at *http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants_spoc/* before sending it through *http://www.grants.gov .*
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Office of Personnel Management

# AGENCY:

Office of Personnel Management. 

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-13, May 22, 1995), this notice announces that the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) has submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) a request for reclearance of a revised information collection. RI 30-9, Reinstatement of Disability Annuity Previously Terminated Because of Restoration to Earning Capacity, informs former disability annuitants of their right to request restoration under title 5, U.S.C. Section 8337. It also specifies the conditions to be met and the documentation required for a person to request reinstatement. 

Approximately 200 forms are completed annually. The form takes approximately 60 minutes to respond, including a medical examination. The annual estimated burden is 200 hours. Burden may vary depending on the time required for a medical examination. 

                        For copies of this proposal, contact Mary Beth Smith-Toomey on (202) 606-8358, FAX (202) 418-3251 or via E-mail to                         *MaryBeth.Smith-Toomey@opm.gov.*                         Please include a mailing address with your request.                     

# DATES:

Comments on this proposal should be received within 30 calendar days from the date of this publication. 

# ADDRESSES:

Send or deliver comments to— 

Pamela S. Israel, Chief, Operations Support Group, Center for Retirement and Insurance Services, U.S. Office of Personnel Management, 1900 E Street, NW., Room 3349, Washington, DC 20415-3540. and 

Brenda Aguilar, OPM Desk Officer, Office of Information & Regulatory Affair, Office of Management and Budget, New Executive Office Building, NW., Room 10235, Washington, DC 20503. 

*For Information Regarding Administrative Coordination—Contact:*                         Cyrus S. Benson, Team Leader, Publications Team, RIS Support Services/Support Group, (202) 606-0623.                     

      ( print page 55810)    
U.S. Office of Personnel Management. 

Dan G. Blair, 

Deputy Director. 

[FR Doc. 06-8139 Filed 9-22-06; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6325-38-P
Editorial Note on Part 660
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 660 appear at 67 FR 65906, Oct. 29, 2002, 88 FR 81358, Nov. 22, 2023.

§ 660.6 Prohibitions. In addition to the general prohibitions specified in § 600.725 of this chapter, and the other prohibitions specified in this part, it is unlawful for any person to: ( a ) *Directed commercial fishing.* Engage in directed commercial fishing for Shared EC Species from a vessel engaged in commercial fishing within the EEZ off Washington, Oregon, or California. This prohibition does not apply to: ( 1 ) Fishing authorized by the Hoh, Makah, or Quileute Indian Tribes, or by the Quinault Indian Nation, or
( 2 ) Fishing trips conducted entirely within state marine waters.
( b ) *At-sea processing.* At-sea processing of Shared EC Species is prohibited within the EEZ, except while processing groundfish in accordance with subpart D of this part.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

EDWARD RONJE,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

 v.

AUDREY KING; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 15-16125

D.C. No. 1:14-cv-01589-LJO-JLT

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Lawrence J. O’Neill, Chief Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 26, 2016** 

Before: SCHROEDER, CANBY, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges. 

Edward Ronje, who is civilly committed in California, appeals pro se from

the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action arising from

his confinement under California’s Sexually Violent Predators Act (“SVPA”). We

have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal under 28

FILED

AUG 04 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). Huftile v. Miccio-Fonseca, 410 F.3d 1136, 1138 (9th

Cir. 2005). We affirm in part, vacate in part, and remand. 

The district court properly dismissed Ronje’s action as barred by Heck v.

Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994), because success in Ronje’s action would

necessarily demonstrate the invalidity of his SVPA civil commitment, and Ronje

failed to allege facts sufficient to show that his commitment under the 2009

protocol had been invalidated. See Wilkinson v. Dotson, 544 U.S. 74, 80-82 (2005)

(a prisoner’s § 1983 action is barred if success “would necessarily demonstrate the

invalidity of confinement or its duration[,]” unless “the conviction or sentence has

already been invalidated” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)); Huftile,

410 F.3d at 1139-41 (applying Heck to SVPA civil commitment). However, we

vacate the judgment to the extent that it dismissed the action with prejudice, and

remand for entry of dismissal without prejudice. See Trimble v. City of Santa

Rosa, 49 F.3d 583, 585 (9th Cir. 1995) (Heck dismissals are without prejudice).

The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying leave to amend

after concluding that amendment would be futile. See Chappel v. Lab. Corp. of

Am., 232 F.3d 719, 725-26 (9th Cir. 2000) (setting forth standard of review and

explaining that a court may deny leave to amend when it would be futile).

AFFIRMED in part, VACATED in part, and REMANDED.

2 15-16125
#### Briggs, *Appellant,*v. Holmstrong.

Evidence : exemplified copy of patent. An exemplification of the record of a patent from the United States showing that the patent was signed by the President, by his initials, and countersigned by the Commissioner of the General Land Office, by his initials, is admissible in evidence as a copy of the patent.

*Appeal from Hannibal Court of Common Pleas.*— Hon. John T. Redd, Judge.

Reversed.

This was an action of ejectment. Plaintiff! offered in evidence an exemplified copy of a patent from the United States government, which was excluded, and plaintiff took a non-suit.

*Ewing & Hough*and *W. P. Harrison*for appellant.

*Thos. H. Bacon*and *W. M. Boulware*for respondent.

Napton, J.

The only question in this case is as to a proper construction of the act of Congress of March 3rd, 1843. The recent case of *McGarrahan v. Mining Co.,*96 U. S. 316, is referred to by both parties, and is conclusive in this case upon this court. In that the exemplification of the record of the patent showed the signature of the President in full, but an entire blank was left opposite the Recorder of the Land Office. In the present case the signature of the President is J. Q. A., and that of the Commissioner of the General Land Office is G. G. The court says in the former case, in .reference to the act of 1843: “ This act does not dispense with the signing and countersigning. The record, to prove a valid patent, must still *338show that those provisions of the law were complied with. The names need not be fully inserted in the record, but it must appear in some form that the names were actually signed to the patent when it issued. If they are partially inserted in the record, it will he presumed that they fully appeared in the patent; but no such presumption will be raised if no signature is shown by the record. Here no signature does appear, and consequently none will be presumed.” In accordance with these views, the judgment of the circuit court must be reversed, since the initials of the names of both the President and Commissioner were in the exemplification offered, and this case is remanded.

The other judges concur.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-20-00329-CV

In the Interest of S. V. and J. K. N. aka K. V., children

On Appeal from the

County Court at Law of Aransas County, Texas

Trial Cause No. A-19-7100-FL

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED. No costs are assessed, due to 

appellant’s inability to pay costs. 

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

January 21, 2021
Case 16-26268 Doc 1 Filed 08/16/16 Entered 08/16/16 13:48:48 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 10
Case 16-26268 Doc 1 Filed 08/16/16 Entered 08/16/16 13:48:48 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 10
Case 16-26268 Doc 1 Filed 08/16/16 Entered 08/16/16 13:48:48 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 10
Case 16-26268 Doc 1 Filed 08/16/16 Entered 08/16/16 13:48:48 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 10
Case 16-26268 Doc 1 Filed 08/16/16 Entered 08/16/16 13:48:48 Desc Main

 Document Page 5 of 10
Case 16-26268 Doc 1 Filed 08/16/16 Entered 08/16/16 13:48:48 Desc Main

 Document Page 6 of 10
Case 16-26268 Doc 1 Filed 08/16/16 Entered 08/16/16 13:48:48 Desc Main

 Document Page 7 of 10
Case 16-26268 Doc 1 Filed 08/16/16 Entered 08/16/16 13:48:48 Desc Main

 Document Page 8 of 10
Case 16-26268 Doc 1 Filed 08/16/16 Entered 08/16/16 13:48:48 Desc Main

 Document Page 9 of 10
Case 16-26268 Doc 1 Filed 08/16/16 Entered 08/16/16 13:48:48 Desc Main

 Document Page 10 of 10
REASON FOR ISSUE: To introduce a life limit for the Nose Landing Gear (NLG) Retraction Actuator Bolt, Spacer, Sleeve, End Plate and

Ball.

To revise the task interval for discard task 52−11−41−101* (was 1500 L COMPONENT).

ACTION: Add the tasks that follow to the list of Chapter 32 tasks in Section 5−10−11.

Replace task 52−11−41−101* with the task that follows:

Source Document Ref. No. Chapter 5 Task No. Task Title Task Interval

RBR−C700−301

Rev. AL

32−33−01−106 *

(one star)

Discard the Nose Landing Gear (NLG) Retraction Actuator

Bolt, Part No. 1285−0041 (Aircraft with NHA Part No.

GW311−1100−23 only)

577 L

COMPONENT 

RBR−C700−301

Rev. AL

32−33−01−107 *

(one star)

Discard the Nose Landing Gear (NLG) Retraction Actuator

Spacer, Part No. 22193−1

577 L

COMPONENT 

RBR−C700−301

Rev. AL

32−33−01−108 *

(one star)

Discard the Nose Landing Gear (NLG) Retraction Actuator

Sleeve, Part No. 22195−1

577 L

COMPONENT 

RBR−C700−301

Rev. AL

32−33−01−109 *

(one star)

Discard the Nose Landing Gear (NLG) Retraction Actuator

End Plate, Part No. 22194−1

577 L

COMPONENT 

RBR−C700−301

Rev. AL

32−33−01−110 *

(one star)

Discard the Nose Landing Gear (NLG) Retraction Actuator

Ball, Part No. 22407−1 (Aircraft with NHA Part No.

GW311−1100−23 only)

577 L

COMPONENT 

Sep 09/2014

5

−10

−11 Page 1 of 2 PART 2 TR 5

−

2

−10

GL 5000 FEATURING GLOBAL VISION FLIGHT DECK − TIME LIMITS/MAINTENANCE CHECKS

TEMPORARY REVISION NO. 5−2−10

INSERT IN SECTION 5−10−11

FACING PAGE 3

NOTE: Remove existing Temporary Revision 5−2−9 and replace with this Temporary Revision 5−2−10. Record the removal of Temporary

Revision 5−2−9 and the incorporation of this Temporary Revision on the yellow RECORD OF TEMPORARY REVISIONS sheet at

the front of this manual and LIST OF EFFECTIVE TEMPORARY REVISIONS sheet at the front of Part 2.

EFFECTIVITY: ALL
Source Document Ref. No. Chapter 5 Task No. Task Title Task Interval

RBR−C700−301

Rev. AK−1

52−11−41−101 *

(one star)

Discard the Passenger Door Tensator Spring, Part No.

GS321−0580−1

PHASE−IN: For aircraft with passenger door tensator

springs with more than 550 Landings COMPONENT, as of

the date of TL/MC Temporary Revision 5−2−9 (Jun

04/2014), this task must be accomplished within 6 Months

from the date of TR 5−2−9 or

1500 Landings COMPONENT, whichever comes first.

650 L

COMPONENT 

Sep 09/2014

5

−10

−11 Page 2 of 2 PART 2 TR 5

−

2

−10

GL 5000 FEATURING GLOBAL VISION FLIGHT DECK − TIME LIMITS/MAINTENANCE CHECKS

EFFECTIVITY: ALL