15664 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 60 / Tuesday, March 30, 2010 / Proposed Rules 

subcategory for which a permit 

application is required. 

(v) For each identified emission point 

or group of affected emission points, an 

identification of control technology in 

place. 

(vi) Any additional emission data or 

other information specifically requested 

by the permitting authority. 

(3) The permit application for a 

MACT determination may, but is not 

required to, contain the following 

information: 

* * * * * 

§ 63.54 [Amended] 

6. Section 63.54 is amended by 

removing the first sentence of the 

introductory text of the section. 

7. Section 63.55 is amended by 

revising paragraphs (a) introductory text 

and (b) to read as follows: 

§ 63.55 Maximum achievable control 

technology (MACT) determinations for 

affected sources subject to case-by-case 

determination of equivalent emission 

limitations. 

(a) Requirements for permitting 

authorities. The permitting authority 

must determine whether the permit 

application is complete or an 

application for a Notice of MACT 

Approval is approvable. In either case, 

when the application is complete or 

approvable, the permitting authority 

must establish hazardous air pollutant 

emissions limitations equivalent to the 

limitations that would apply if an 

emission standard had been issued in a 

timely manner under section 112(d) of 

the Act. The permitting authority must 

establish these emissions limitations 

consistent with the following 

requirements and principles: 

* * * * * 

(b) Reporting to EPA. The owner or 

operator must submit additional copies 

of its application for a title V permit, 

permit revision, or Notice of MACT 

Approval, whichever is applicable, to 

the EPA at the same time the material 

is submitted to the permitting authority. 

8. Section 63.56 is amended by 

revising the first sentence of paragraph 

(b), and paragraphs (c)(1) and (2) to read 

as follows: 

§ 63.56 Requirements for case-by-case 

determination of equivalent emission 

limitations after promulgation of 

subsequent MACT standard. 

* * * * * 

(b) If the Administrator promulgates a 

relevant emission standard under 

section 112(d) of the Act that is 

applicable to a source after the date a 

permit is issued pursuant to § 63.52 or 

§ 63.54, the permitting authority must 

incorporate requirements of that 

standard in the title V permit upon its 

next renewal. * * * 

(c) * * * 

(1) If the Administrator promulgates 

an emission standard under section 

112(d) that is applicable to an affected 

source after the date a permit 

application under this paragraph is 

approved under § 63.52 or § 63.54, the 

permitting authority is not required to 

change the emission limitation in the 

permit to reflect the promulgated 

standard if the permitting authority 

determines that the level of control 

required by the emission limitation in 

the permit is substantially as effective as 

that required by the promulgated 

standard pursuant to § 63.1(e). 

(2) If the Administrator promulgates 

an emission standard under section 

112(d) of the Act that is applicable to an 

affected source after the date a permit 

application is approved under § 63.52 or 

§ 63.54, and the level of control required 

by the promulgated standard is less 

stringent than the level of control 

required by any emission limitation in 

the prior case-by-case MACT 

determination, the permitting authority 

is not required to incorporate any less 

stringent emission limitation of the 

promulgated standard in the title V 

permit and may in its discretion 

consider any more stringent provisions 

of the MACT determination to be 

applicable legal requirements when 

issuing or revising such a title V permit. 

Table 1 to Subpart B of Part 63— 

[Removed] 

9. Table 1 to Subpart B of part 63 is 

removed. 

Table 2 to Subpart B of Part 63— 

[Removed] 

10. Table 2 to Subpart B of part 63 is 

removed. 

[FR Doc. 2010–7041 Filed 3–29–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

CORPORATION FOR NATIONAL AND 

COMMUNITY SERVICE 

45 CFR Parts 2527, 2551, and 2552 

RIN 3045–AA51 

Serve America Act Amendments to the 

National and Community Service Act 

of 1990 and the Domestic Volunteer 

Service Act of 1973 

AGENCY: Corporation for National and 

Community Service. 

ACTION: Proposed rule with request for 

comments; correction. 

SUMMARY: The Corporation for National 

and Community Service (the 

Corporation) is correcting a proposed 

rule to implement changes to the 

operation of the National Service Trust 

and the Senior Corps programs under 

the Serve America Act, that appeared in 

the Federal Register of February 23, 

2010 (75 FR 8013). That document 

incorrectly amended 45 CFR 2527.10(c) 

by removing current paragraph (c)(2). 

Additionally, there were two 

misstatements in the preamble. First, in 

an example to illustrate the limitation 

on the value of education awards an 

individual may receive, the preamble 

stated that a person who had previously 

earned the aggregate value of 1.71 

awards could enroll in a quarter-time, 

minimum-time, reduced part-time, or 

Silver Scholar position. The inclusion of 

reduced part-time as an option in this 

example was in error. Second, the 

preamble incorrectly described the 

hardship waiver for Senior Companion 

and Foster Grandparent programs in the 

preamble. This document corrects the 

interim final rule by revising the 

preamble language providing an 

example of the aggregate value of 

education awards and the language 

describing the hardship waiver for 

Senior Companion and Foster 

Grandparent programs and by revising 

the instructions for 45 CFR 2527.10. 

DATES: To be sure your comments are 

considered, they must reach the 

Corporation on or before April 26, 2010. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Amy Borgstrom, Docket Manager, 

Corporation for National and 

Community Service, (202) 606–6930, 

TDD (202) 606–3472. Persons with 

visual impairments may request this 

document in an alternate format. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In FR Doc. 

2010–3385, beginning on page 8013 in 

the Federal Register of Thursday, 

February 23, 2010, make the following 

corrections: 

1. In the Supplementary Information 

section, on page 8019, revise the second 

paragraph of the second column to read 

as follows: 

Using the example above, if an individual 

had received an aggregate value of 1.71 

awards in the past, that individual may be 

eligible to enroll in a quarter-time, minimumtime, or Silver Scholar position, but would 

not be eligible to enroll in a part-time or fulltime position, since the value of a part-time 

award, .5, plus 1.71, is greater than 2. 

2. In the Supplementary Information 

section, on page 8023, in the second 

column, revise the paragraph entitled 

‘‘Hardship Waiver Permitted for Cost 

Reimbursement Cap for Senior 

Companion and Foster Grandparent 

Programs (§§ 2552.92, 2552.92)’’ to read 

as follows: 

WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS

Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 60 / Tuesday, March 30, 2010 / Proposed Rules 15665 

Hardship Waiver Permitted for Cost 

Reimbursement Requirement for Senior 

Companion and Foster Grandparent 

Programs (§§ 2551.92, 2552.92) ‘‘Under 

current regulations, the total of cost 

reimbursements attributable to Senior 

Companions or Foster Grandparents, 

including stipends, insurance, transportation, 

meals, physical examinations, and 

recognition, must equal at least 80 percent of 

the Federal share of the grant award. Because 

of the financial challenges faced by some 

organizations as a result of the recent 

economic downturn and the real potential for 

a decrease in non-Federal support, the 

proposed rule permits the Corporation to 

allow an exception to the 80 percent 

requirement in cases of demonstrated need. 

Demonstrated need would include initial 

difficulties in developing local funding 

sources in the first three years of operation; 

an economic downturn, natural disaster, or 

other similar event that severely reduces 

sources of local funding support; or the 

unexpected discontinuation of a long-term 

local funding source. 

3. On page 8027, in the second 

column, revise paragraph (c) to read as 

follows: 

§ 2527.10 [Corrected] 

* * * * * 

(c) Reduced part-time term of service. 

The education award for a reduced parttime term of service in an approved 

AmeriCorps position of fewer than 900 

hours is: 

(1) An amount equal to the product of: 

(i) The number of hours of service 

required to complete the reduced parttime term of service divided by 900; and 

(ii) The amount of the education 

award for a part-time term of service 

described in paragraph (b) of this 

section; or 

(2) An amount as otherwise 

determined by the Corporation. 

* * * * * 

Dated: March 23, 2010. 

Frank R. Trinity, 

General Counsel. 

[FR Doc. 2010–6962 Filed 3–29–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6050–$$–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

National Oceanic and Atmospheric 

Administration 

50 CFR Part 622 

[Docket No. 100217094–0115–01] 

RIN 0648–AY57 

Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of 

Mexico, and South Atlantic; Reef Fish 

Fishery of the Gulf of Mexico; Red 

Snapper Management Measures 

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries 

Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 

Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), 

Commerce. 

ACTION: Proposed rule; request for 

comments. 

SUMMARY: NMFS issues this proposed 

rule that would implement a regulatory 

amendment to the Fishery Management 

Plan for the Reef Fish Resources of the 

Gulf of Mexico (FMP) prepared by the 

Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management 

Council (Council). This proposed rule 

would increase the commercial and 

recreational quotas for red snapper and 

provide an estimated closure date for 

the 2010 recreational red snapper 

component of the Gulf of Mexico (Gulf) 

reef fish fishery. The intended effect of 

the proposed rule is to help achieve 

optimum yield (OY) by relaxing red 

snapper harvest limitations consistent 

with the findings of the recent stock 

assessment for this species. 

DATES: Written comments must be 

received on or before April 14, 2010. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments 

on the proposed rule identified by 

0648–AY57 by any of the following 

methods: 

• Electronic submissions: Submit 

electronic comments via the Federal 

e-Rulemaking Portal: http:// 

www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments. 

• Mail: Peter Hood, Southeast 

Regional Office, NMFS, 263 13th 

Avenue South, St. Petersburg, FL 33701. 

• Fax: 727–824–5308; Attention: 

Peter Hood. 

Instructions: No comments will be 

posted for public viewing until after the 

comment period has closed. All 

comments received are a part of the 

public record and will generally be 

posted to http://www.regulations.gov 

without change. All Personal Identifying 

Information (for example, name, 

address, etc.) voluntarily submitted by 

the commenter may be publicly 

accessible. Do not submit Confidential 

Business Information or otherwise 

sensitive or protected information. 

NMFS will accept anonymous 

comments (enter N/A in the required 

field if you wish to remain anonymous). 

You may submit attachments to 

electronic comments in Microsoft Word, 

Excel, WordPerfect, or Adobe PDF file 

formats only. 

Copies of the regulatory amendment, 

which includes an environmental 

assessment and a regulatory impact 

review may be obtained from the Gulf 

of Mexico Fishery Management Council, 

2203 North Lois Avenue, Suite 1100, 

Tampa, FL 33607; telephone 813–348– 

1630; fax 813–348–1711; e-mail 

gulfcouncil@gulfcouncil.org; or may be 

downloaded from the Council’s Web 

site at http://www.gulfcouncil.org/. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Peter Hood, 727–824–5308. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The reef 

fish fishery of the Gulf of Mexico is 

managed under the FMP. The FMP was 

prepared by the Council and is 

implemented through regulations at 50 

CFR part 622 under the authority of the 

Magnuson-Stevens Fishery 

Conservation and Management Act 

(Magnuson-Stevens Act). 

Background 

According to the updated stock 

assessment for Gulf red snapper, 

conducted in 2009, the stock is still 

overfished and rebuilding, but 

overfishing is projected to have ended 

in 2009. The rebuilding plan for Gulf 

red snapper was outlined in 

Amendment 22 to the FMP, and 

implemented through regulations in 

2005. Actions taken in 2008 through 

Joint Amendment 27 to the FMP and 

Amendment 14 to the FMP for the 

Shrimp Fishery of the Gulf of Mexico 

revised the red snapper rebuilding 

strategy with the intent to end 

overfishing by 2009 or 2010 and rebuild 

red snapper by 2032 to the biomass 

levels that can support harvest of the 

maximum sustainable yield (MSY). The 

revised rebuilding plan outlined that 

after 2010, total allowable catch (TAC) 

would be increased consistent with a 

fishing mortality rate that produces 

MSY. 

The Southeast Data, Assessment, and 

Review (SEDAR) update assessment for 

Gulf red snapper was conducted in 

August 2009, with the objective of 

updating the 2005 SEDAR 7 red snapper 

benchmark assessment. The 2009 

assessment updated, reviewed, and 

incorporated all data included in the 

SEDAR 7 assessment, as well as new 

information that became available after 

the 2005 assessment. The results of the 

assessment update, as reviewed and 

approved by the Council’s Scientific 

WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS