## ENVIRONMENTAL PROT ECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Ch. I

[ 9467-6 ]

EPA-HQ-OW-2010-0728

Fall 2011 Regulatory Agenda

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Semiannual regulatory flexibility agenda and semiannual regulatory agenda.

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) publishes the semiannual regulatory agenda

online (the e-Agenda) at http://www. reginfo.gov and at www.regulations.g ov to update the public about:

 Regulations and major policies currently under development,

 Reviews of existing regulations and major policies, and

 Rules and major policymakings completed or canceled since the last agenda.

Definitions:

‘‘E-Agenda,’’ ‘‘online regulatory agenda,’’ and ‘‘sem iannual regulatory agenda’’ all refer to the same

comprehensive collection of information that, until 2007, was published in the Federal Register but that

now is only available through an online database.

‘‘Regulatory Flexibility Agenda’’ refers to a document that contains informat ion about regulations that

may have a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities. We continue to publish it in the

Federal Register because that is what is required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980.

## "Monthly Action Initiation List" (AIL) refers to a list that EPA posts online each month of the regulations

newly approved for development.

‘‘Unified Regulatory Agenda’’ refers to the co llection of all agencies’ agendas with an introduction

prepared by the Regulatory Information Service Center.

‘‘Regulatory Agenda Preamble’’ refers to the document you are reading now. It appears as part of the

Regulatory Flexibility Agenda and introduces both the Regulatory Flexibility Agenda and the e-Agenda.

“Regulatory Development and Retrospective Re view Tracker” refers to an online portal to EPA’s

priority rules and retrospective reviews of existing regulations. More information about the Regulatory

Development and Retrospective Review Tracke r appears in section H of this preamble.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions or comments about a particular

action, please get in touch with the agency co ntact listed in each agenda entry. If you have general

questions about the semiannual regulatory agen da, please contact: Caryn Muellerleile

(muellerleile.caryn@epa.gov; 202-564-2855) or Phil Schwartz (schwartz.philip@epa.gov; 202-564-6564).

TO BE PLACED ON OR REMOVED FROM A MAILING LIST FOR UPDATED INFORMATION ON

RULES UNDER DEVELOPMENT: If you would like to receive or discontinue receiving an e-mail with a

link to new semiannual regulatory agendas as soon as they are published, please send an e-mail

message with your name and add ress to: Regulatory_A genda@epa.gov and state ‘‘EPA E-Agenda: Add’’

or ‘‘EPA E-Agenda: Remove’’ as appropriate in the subject line.

If you would like to regularly receive informat ion about the rules newly approved for development, sign

up for our monthly Action Initiation List by going to

http://www.epa.gov/lawsregs/regulati ons/ail.html#notification and completing the steps listed there.

You can track progress on variou s aspects of EPA’s priori ty rulemakings by signing up for RSS feeds

from the Regulatory Development and Retrospective Review Tracker at

http://yosemite.epa.gov/opei/RuleGate.ns f/content/getalerts.html?opendocument

## SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Table of Contents

A. Map of Regulatory Agenda Information

B. What Key Statutes and Executive Orders Guide

EPA’s Rule and Policymaking Process?

C. How Can You Be Involved in EPA’ s Rule and Policymaking Process?

D. What Actions Are Included in the E-Agenda and the Regulatory Agenda?

E. How Is the E-Agenda Organized?

F. What Information Is in the Regulatory Flexibility Agenda and the E-Agenda?

G. How Can You Find Out About Rulemakings That Start Up After the Regulatory Agenda Is Signed?

H. What Tools for Mining Regulatory Agenda Data and for Finding More A bout EPA Rules and Policies

Are Available at Reginfo.go v, EPA.gov, and Regulations.gov?

I. Reviews of Rules with Significant Impacts on a Substantial Number of Small Entities

J. What Other Special Attention Does EPA Give to the Impacts of Rules on Small Businesses, Small

Governments, and Small Nonprofit Organizations?

K. Thank You for Collaborating With Us

A. Map of Regulatory Agenda Information

Type of Information Online Locations Federal

Register

Location

Semiannual Regulatory

Agenda www.reginfo.gov/ and www.regulations.gov Not in FR

## Semiannual Regulatory

Flexibility Agenda www.reginfo.gov/ and http://www.r egulations.gov Part XII of

today’s issue

Monthly Action Initiation List http://www. regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=EPA-HQ-OA2008-0265 and

http://www.epa.gov/lawsregs/regulations/ail.html Not in FR

Regulatory Development

and Retrospective Review

Tracker www.epa.gov/regdarrt/ Not in FR

B. What Key Statutes and Executive Orders Guide EPA’s Rule and Policymaking Process?

A number of environmental laws authorize EPA’s actions, including but not limited to:

 Clean Air Act (CAA),

 Clean Water Act (CWA),

 Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA, or Superfund),

 Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA),

 Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA),

 Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA),

 Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA), and

 Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA).

Not only must EPA comply with environmental laws, but also administrative legal requirements that apply

to the issuance of regulations, such as: the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), the Regulatory Flexibility

Act (RFA) as amended by the Small Business Regul atory Enforcement Fairne ss Act (SBREFA), the

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA), the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), the National Technology

Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA), and the Congressional Review Act (CRA).

## EPA also meets a number of require ments contained in num erous Executiv e Orders: 12866, “Regulatory

Planning and Review” (58 FR 51735, Oct. 4, 1993) , as supplemented by Executive Order 13563,

“Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review” (76 FR 3821, Jan. 21, 2011); 12898, “Environmental

Justice” (59 FR 7629, Feb. 16, 1994); 13045, “Children’s Health Protection” (62 FR 19885, Apr. 23,

1997); 13132, “Federalism” (64 FR 43255, Aug. 10, 1999); 13175, “Consultation and Coordination with

Indian Tribal Governments” (65 FR 67249, Nov. 9, 2000); 13211, “Actions Concerning Regulations That

Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribut ion, or Use” (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001).

In addition to meeting its mission go als and priorities as described above, EPA has begun reviewing its

existing regulations under Execut ive Order (EO) 13563, “Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review

. ”

This EO provides for periodic retrospective review of existing significant regulations and is intended to

determine whether any such regulations should be modified, streamlined, expanded, or repealed, so as to

make the Agency's regulatory program more effective or less burdensome in achieving the regulatory

objectives. More information about this review is described in EPA’s Statement of Priorities in the

Regulatory Plan.

C. How Can You Be Involved in EPA’s Rule and Policymaking Process?

You can make your voice heard by getting in to uch with the contact person provided in each agenda

entry. EPA encourages you to participate as early in the process as possible. You may also participate by

commenting on proposed rules published in the Federal Register (FR).

Instructions on how to submit your comment s are provided in each Notice of Proposed Rulemaking

(NPRMs). To be most effective, comments should contain information and data that support your

position, and you also should explain why EPA shoul d incorporate your sugge stion in the rule or

nonregulatory action. You can be particul arly helpful and persuasive if y ou provide examples to illustrate

your concerns and offer specific alternatives.

## EPA believes its actions will be more cost effect ive and protective if the dev elopment process includes

stakeholders working with us to help identify the most practical and effective solutions to problems.

Democracy gives real power to individual citizens, but with that power comes responsibility. EPA

encourages you to become involved in its rule and policymaking process. For more information about

public involvement in EPA activities, please visit www.epa.gov/open.

D. What Actions Are Included in the E-Agenda and the Regulatory Flexibility Agenda?

EPA includes regulations and certain major policy documents in t he e-Agenda. However, there is no

legal significance to the omission of an item fr om the agenda, and EPA generally does not include the

following categories of actions:

 Administrative actions such as delegations of authority, changes of address, or phone numbers;

 Under the CAA: Revisions to state implementation plans; equivalent methods for ambient air quality

monitoring; deletions from the new source performanc e standards source categories list; delegations of

authority to states; area designations for air quality planning purposes;

 Under FIFRA: Registration-related decisions, acti ons affecting the status of currently registered

pesticides, and data call-ins;

 Under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act: Actions regarding pesticide tolerances and food

additive regulations;

 Under RCRA: Authorization of State solid wa ste management plans; hazardous waste delisting

petitions;

 Under the CWA: State Water Quality Standards; delet ions from the section 307(a) list of toxic

pollutants; suspensions of toxic testing requireme nts under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination

System (NPDES); delegations of NPDES authority to States;

 Under SDWA: Actions on State under ground injection control programs.

The Regulatory Flexibility Agenda includes:

##  Actions likely to have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.

 Rules the Agency has identified for periodic review under section 610 of the RFA. EPA is closing the

610 review for one rule in fall 2011.

E. How Is the E-Agenda Organized?

You can now choose how both the www.reginfo.gov and www.regulations.gov versions of the eAgenda are organized. Current choices include: EPA subagency; stage of rulemaking, which is

explained below; alphabetically by title; and by the R egulation Identifier Number (RIN), which is assigned

sequentially when an action is added to the agenda.

Stages of rulemaking include:

1. Prerulemaking—Prerulemakin g actions are generally intended to determine whether EPA should

initiate rulemaking. Prerulemakings may include anything that influences or leads to rulemaking, such as

Advance Notices of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRMs) , studies or analyses of the possible need for

regulatory action, announcement of reviews of existi ng regulations required under section 610 of the

Regulatory Flexibility Act, requests for public comment on the need for regulatory action, or important

preregulatory policy proposals.

2. Proposed Rule—This sect ion includes EPA rulemaking actions that are within a year of proposal

(publication of Notices of Proposed Rulemakings [NPRMs]).

3. Final Rule—This section includ es rules that will be issued as a final rule within a year.

4. Long-Term Actions—This section includes rulemaki ngs for which the next scheduled regulatory action

is after December 2012. We urge you to explore becoming involved even if an action is listed in the

## Long-Term category. By the time an action is lis ted in the Proposed Rules category you may have

missed the opportunity to participate in certai n public meetings or policy dialogues.

5. Completed Actions—This section contains action s that have been promulgated and published in the

Federal Register since publication of the sp ring 2011 Agenda. It also incl udes actions that EPA is no

longer considering. If an action appears in the comple ted section, it will not appear in future agendas

unless the Agency decides to initiate the action agai n, in which case it will appear as a new entry. EPA

also announces the results of the RFA secti on 610 reviews in this section of the agenda.

F. What Information Is in the Regulat ory Flexibility Agenda and the E-Agenda?

The Regulatory Flexibility Agenda entries inclu de only the nine categories of information that are

required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 and by Federal Register Agenda printing requirements:

Sequence Number, RIN, Title, Description, Statut ory Authority, Section 610 Review, if applicable,

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required, Schedule and Contact Person. The e-Agenda has much more

extensive information on these actions, including such things as email addresses and Internet URLs for

additional information.

E-Agenda entries include:

Title: Titles for new entries (those that have not appear ed in previous agendas) are preceded by a bullet

( ● ). The notation ‘‘Section 610 Review’’ follows the title if we are reviewing the rule as part of our periodic

review of existing rules under secti on 610 of the RFA (5 U.S.C. 610).

Priority: Entries are placed into one of five categories described below. OMB reviews all significant rules

including both of the first two categories, ‘‘economically significant’’ and ‘‘other significant.’’

## Economically Significant: Under Executive Order 12866, a rulemaking that may have an annual effect on

the economy of $100 million or more, or adversely affect in a material way the economy, a sector of the

economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public health or safety, or State, local, or tribal

governments or communities.

Other Significant: A rulemaking that is not economically significant but is considered significant for other

reasons. This category includes rules that may:

1. Create a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an action taken or planned by another

agency;

2. Materially alter the budgetary impact of entitlement s, grants, user fees, or loan programs, or the rights

and obligations of recipients; or

3. Raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal mandates, the President’s priorities, or the

principles in Executive Order 12866.

Substantive, Nonsignificant: A rulemaking that has substantive impacts but is not Significant, Routine and

Frequent, or Informational/Administrative/Other.

Routine and Frequent: A rulemaking that is a specific case of a recurring application of a regulatory

program in the Code of Federal Regulations (e.g., certain State Implementation Plans, National Priority

List updates, Significant New Use Rules, State Hazardous Waste Management Program actions, and

Tolerance Exemptions). If an action that would norm ally be classified Routine and Frequent is reviewed

by the Office of Management and Budget under EO 12866, then we would classify the action as either

“Economically Significant” or “Other Significant.”

## Informational/Administrative/Other: An action that is pr imarily informational or pertains to an action outside

the scope of EO 12866.

Also, if a rule may be “Major” as defined in the Congressional Review Act (5 USC 801, et seq. )

because it is likely to result in an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more or meets other

criteria specified in this law, appears under the “P riority” heading with the statement “Major under 5 USC

801.”

Legal Authority: The sections of the United States Code (USC), Public Law (PL), Executive Order (EO), or

common name of the law that aut horizes the regulatory action.

CFR Citation: The sections of the Code of Federal Regulatio ns that would be affected by the action.

Legal Deadline: An indication of whether the rule is subject to a statutory or judicial deadline, the date of

that deadline, and whether the deadline pertains to a No tice of Proposed Rulemaking, a Final Action, or

some other action.

Abstract: A brief description of the problem the action will address.

Timetable: The dates (and citations) that documents for this action were published in the Federal

Register and, where possible, a projected date for the nex t step. Projected publication dates frequently

change during the course of developing an action. The pr ojections in the agenda are best estimates as of

the date we submit the agenda for pub lication. For some entries, the time table indicates that the date of

the next action is “to be determined.”

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Indicates whether EPA has prepared or anticipates that it will be

preparing a regulatory flexibility analysis under sect ion 603 or 604 of the RFA. Generally, such an

## analysis is required for proposed or final rules subject to the RFA that EPA believes may have a

significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.

Small Entities Affected: Indicates whether the rule is anticipated to have any effect on small businesses,

small governments or sma ll nonprofit organizations.

Government Levels Affected: Indicates whether the rule may have any effect on levels of government

and, if so, whether the governments are State, local, tribal, or Federal.

Federalism Implications: Indicates whether the action is expected to have substantial direct effects on the

States, on the relationship between the National Go vernment and the States, or on the distribution of

power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.

Unfunded Mandates: Section 202 of UMRA generally requires an assessment of anticipated costs and

benefits if a rule includes a mandate that may result in expenditures of more than $100 million in any one

year by State, local, and tribal gover nments, in the aggregate, or by t he private sector. If it is anticipated

to exceed this $100 million threshold, we note it in this section.

Energy Impacts: Indicates whether the action is a significant energy action under EO 13211.

Sectors Affected: Indicates the main economic sectors regulated by the action. The regulated parties are

identified by their North American Industry Classifi cation System (NAICS) codes. These codes were

created by the Census Bureau for collecting, anal yzing, and publishing statistical data on the U.S.

economy. There are more than 1,000 NAICS codes fo r sectors in agriculture, mining, manufacturing,

services, and public administration.

International Trade Impacts : Indicates whether the action is likely to have international trade or

investment effects, or otherwis e be of international interest.

Agency Contact: The name, address, phone number, and email addres s, if available, of a person who is

knowledgeable about the regulation.

## Additional Information: Other information about the action including docket information.

URLs: For some actions, the Internet addresses ar e included for reading copies of rulemaking

documents, submitting comments on proposals, and ge tting more information about the rulemaking and

the program of which it is a part. (Note: To submit comments on proposals, you can go to the associated

electronic docket, which is housed at www.regulations.gov. Once there, follow the online instructions to

access the docket in question and submit comments. A docket identification [ID] number will assist in the

search for materials. EPA includes the docket number in most of the agenda entries of rulemakings that

have already been proposed.)

RIN: The Regulation Identifier Number is used by OMB to identify and track rulemakings. The first four

digits of the RIN stand for the EPA office with lead responsibility for developing the action.

G. How Can You Find Out About Rulemakings Tha t Start Up After the Regulatory Agenda Is

Signed?

EPA posts monthly information of new rulema kings that the Agency’s se nior managers have decided

that we should develop. This list is also distributed via email. You can see the current list, known as the

Action Initiation List, at http://www.epa.gov/lawsreg s/regulations/ail.html where you will also find

information about how to get an email notification when a new list is posted.

H. What Tools for Mining Regulatory Agenda Data and for Finding More About EPA Rules and

Policies Are Available at Reginfo.gov, EPA.gov, and Regulations.gov?

1. The http://www.reginfo.gov / Searchable Database

The Regulatory Information Service Center and Offi ce of Information and Regulatory Affairs have a

Federal regulatory dashboard that allows user s to view the Regulatory Agenda database

(http://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/eAge ndaMain), which includes powerf ul search, display, and data

transmission options. At that site you can:

## a. See the preamble. At the URL listed above for the Unified Agenda and Regulatory Plan, find

“Current Agenda Agency Preambles.” Environmen tal Protection Agency is listed alphabetically

under “Other Executive Agencies.”

b. Get a complete list of EPA’s entries in the current edition of the Agenda. Use the drop-down

menu in the “Select Agency” box to find Envi ronmental Protection Agency and “Submit.”

c. View the contents of all of EPA’s entries in the current edition of the Agenda . Choose “Search”

from the “Unified Agenda” selection in the toolbar at the top of the page. Within the “Search of

Agenda/Regulatory Plan” screen, open “Advanc ed Search,” then “Continue.” Select

“Environmental Protection Agency” and “Continue. ” Select “Search,” then “View All RIN Data

(Max 350).”

d. Get a listing of entries with specified characteristics. Follow the procedure described immediately

above for viewing the contents of all entries, but on the screen entitled “Advanced Search –

Select Additional Fields,” choose the charac teristics you are seeking before “Search.” For

example, if you wish to see a listing of all ec onomically significant actions that may have a

significant economic impact on a substantial number of small businesses, you would check

“Economically Significant” under “Priority” and “B usiness” under “Regulatory Flexibility Analysis

Required.”

e. Download the results of your searches in XML format.

2. Subject Matter EPA Websites

Some actions listed in the Agenda incl ude a URL that provides additional information.

3. Public Dockets

When EPA publishes either an Advanc e Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM) or a NPRM in the

Federal Register , the Agency typically establishes a docket to accumulate materials throughout the

development process for that rulemaking. The docket serves as the repository for the collection of

documents or information related to a particular Agency action or activity. EPA most commonly uses

## dockets for rulemaking actions, but dockets may also be used for RFA section 610 reviews of rules with

significant economic impacts on a substantial numbe r of small entities and for various non-rulemaking

activities, such as Federal Register documents seeking public comments on draft guidance, policy

statements, information collection requests under the PRA, and other non-rule activities. Docket

information should be in that action’s agenda entr y. All of EPA’s public dockets can be located at

www.regulations.gov.

4. EPA’s Regulatory Development and Retrospective Review Tracker

EPA’s Regulatory Development and Retr ospective Review Tracker (www.e pa.gov/regdarrt/) serves as a

portal to EPA’s priority rules, pr oviding you with earlie r and more frequently upd ated information about

Agency regulations than is provided by the Regulat ory Agenda. It also provides information about

retrospective reviews of existing regulations.

The Regulatory Development and Retrospective Review Tracker (Reg DaRRT) provides information as

soon as work begins and provides updates on a monthly basis as new information becomes available.

Time-sensitive information, such as notice of a public meeting, is updated on a daily basis. Not all of

EPA’s Regulatory Agenda entries appe ar on Reg DaRRT; only priority rulemakings can be found on this

Web site.

I. Reviews of Rules with Significant Impacts on a Substantial Number of Small Entities

Section 610 of the RFA requires that an agency revi ew, within 10 years of promulgation, each rule that

has or will have a significant econ omic impact on a substantial number of small entities. EPA is closing

the 610 review for one rule in fall 2011.

Rule Reviewed RIN Docket ID #

National Primary Drinking Water Regulations; Arsenic

and Clarifications to Compliance and New Source 2040-AF24 EPA-HQ-OW-2010-0728

## Contaminants Monitoring (Section 610 Review)

EPA established an official public dockets for the 610 Review under the do cket identification (ID)

number indicated above. All documents in the docket s are listed on the www.r egulations.gov Web site.

Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly available; e.g., confidential business

information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material,

such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the In ternet and will be publicly available only in hard copy

form. Publicly available docket materials are avail able either electronically th rough www.regulations.gov

or in hard copy at the Water docket, EPA/DC, EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Avenue NW.,

Washington, DC 20460. The Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through

Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone numbe r for the Public Reading Room is (202) 566-1744.

J. What Other Special Attention Does EPA Give to the Impacts of Rules on Small Businesses,

Small Governments, and Sma ll Nonprofit Organizations?

For each of EPA’s rulemakings, consideration is given whether there w ill be any adverse impact on

any small entity. EPA attempts to fit the regulatory requ irements, to the extent feas ible, to the scale of the

businesses, organizations, and governmental ju risdictions subject to the regulation.

Under RFA as amended by SBREFA, the Agency must prepare a formal analysis of the potential

negative impacts on small entities, convene a Small Business Advocacy Review Panel (proposed rule

stage), and prepare a Small Entity Compliance Guide (fi nal rule stage) unless the Agency certifies a rule

will not have a significant economic impact on a subs tantial number of small ent ities. For more detailed

information about the Agency’s policy and practice with respect to implementing RFA/SBREFA, please

visit the RFA/SBREFA Web site at http://www.epa.gov/sbrefa/.

## For a list of the rules under development for wh ich a Regulatory Flexibility Analysis will be required, go

to http://www.regulations.gov/public/component/main?main=UnifiedAgenda and click on Regulatory

Flexibility Analysis – Required toward the bottom of the page.

K. Thank You for Collaborating With Us

Finally, we would like to thank those of you who choose to join with us in making progress on the

complex issues involved in protecting human health and the environment. Collaborative efforts such as

EPA’s open rulemaking process are a valuable tool for addressing the problems we face, and the

regulatory agenda is an important part of that process.

Dated: September 9, 2011

NAME: Shannon Kenny,

Acting Principal Deputy Associate Administrator, Office of Policy.The 318 Regulatory Agendas

Regional Office Chicago - Proposed Rule

Title Regulation
Identifier
Number

Withdrawal of Federal Water Quality Guidance for the Great Lakes System for Michigan 2005-AA02

Regional Office Dallas - Completed Action

Title Regulation
Identifier
Number

Oklahoma Regional Haze Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) 2006-AA00

Regional Office San Francisco - Final Rule

Title Regulation
Identifier
Number

Regulation To Establish No Discharge Zone in California State Waters Under CWA 312(f)(4)(A) 2009-AA04

Regional Office Seattle - Proposed Rule

Title Regulation
Identifier
Number

Revisions to Federal Implementation Plans Under the CAA for Indian Country in Idaho, Oregon and Washington 2012-AA02

Office of General Council - Proposed Rule

Title Regulation
Identifier
Number

Revision of Procedural Rules for Hearings on Cancellations, Suspensions, Changes in Classifications, and Denials of Pesticide Registrations 2015-AA00

Office of General Council - Final Rule

Title Regulation
Identifier
Number

Supplemental Standards of Ethical Conduct for Employees of the Environmental Protection Agency 2015-AA01

Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance - Proposed Rule

Title Regulation
Identifier
Number

NPDES Electronic Reporting Rule 2020-AA47

Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance - Final Rule

Title Regulation
Identifier
Number

Technical Corrections to Title 40 to Conform to the Civil Monetary Penalty Inflation Adjustment Rule 2020-AA49

Office of Environmental Information - Proposed Rule

Title Regulation
Identifier
Number

Modification of Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) Reporting Requirements Primarily Associated With Metal Mining 2025-AA11TRI; Response to Petition To Delete Acetonitrile From the Toxics Release Inventory List of Toxic Chemicals 2025-AA19

Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) Articles Exemption Clarification Rule 2025-AA24

Electronic Reporting of Toxics Release Inventory Data Under the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA) 2025-AA30

Office of Environmental Information - Final Rule

Title Regulation
Identifier
Number

Toxic Release Inventory (TRI) Reporting for Facilities Located on Indian Country 2025-AA31

Office of Environmental Information - Long-term Action

Title Regulation
Identifier
Number

TRI; Response to Petition To Add Diisononyl Phthalate to the Toxics Release Inventory List of Toxic Chemicals 2025-AA17

Office of Environmental Information - Completed Action

Title Regulation
Identifier
Number

TRI; Response to Petition To Delete Chromium, Antimony, Titanate From the Metal Compound Categories Listed on the Toxics Release Inventory 2025-AA16

TRI: Intent to Consider Lifting Administrative Stay Regarding Hydrogen Sulfide Reporting Requirements 2025-AA27

Cross-Media Electronic Reporting Regulation Interpretive Rule 2025-AA32

Water - Proposed Rule

Title Regulation
Identifier
Number

Stormwater Regulations Revision To Address Discharges From Developed Sites 2040-AF13

Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Source Category 2040-AF14

National Primary Drinking Water Regulations for Lead and Copper: Regulatory Revisions 2040-AF15

Water Quality Standards Regulatory Clarifications 2040-AF16

National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit Regulations for the Appropriate Use of Offsets With Regard to Water Quality Permitting 2040-AF17

Revised Regulations for Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations (CAFOs) in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed 2040-AF20

Water Quality Standards for the State of Florida's Estuaries and Coastal Waters 2040-AF21

National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Concentrated Animal Feeding Operation (CAFO) Reporting
Rule 2040-AF22

National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Application and Program Updates Rule 2040-AF25

Effluent Guidelines and Standards for the Dental Point Source Category 2040-AF26

Effluent Guidelines and Standards for the Construction and Development Industry--Revision 2040-AF27

Withdrawal of Federal Water Quality Criteria for Certain States Covered Under EPA’s 1992 National Toxics Rule (NTR) 2040-AF33

Water - Final Rule

Title Regulation
Identifier
Number

National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES): Use of Sufficiently Sensitive Test Methods for Permit Applications and Reporting 2040-AC84

National Primary Drinking Water Regulations: Revisions to the Total Coliform Rule 2040-AD94

Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for Airport Deicing Operations 2040-AE69

Criteria and Standards for Cooling Water Intake Structures 2040-AE95

Guidelines Establishing Test Procedures for the Analysis of Pollutants Under the Clean Water Act; Analysis and Sampling Procedures 2040-AF09

Revisions to the Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Regulation (UCMR 3) for Public Water Systems 2040-AF10

Water - Long-term Action

RegulationTitle Identifier
Number

Uniform National Discharge Standards for Vessels of the Armed Forces--Phase II 2040-AD39

Underground Injection Control: Update of State Programs 2040-AD40

Statement of Policy--NPDES Permit Requirements for Peak Wet Weather Discharges From Publicly Owned Treatment Work Treatment Plants Serving Sanitary Sewer Collection Systems 2040-AD87

Development of Best Management Practices for Recreational Boats Under Section 312(o) of the Clean Water Act 2040-AF03

Oil and Gas Construction Stormwater Rule 2040-AF05

National Primary Drinking Water Regulations: Regulation of Perchlorate 2040-AF28

National Primary Drinking Water Regulations: Group Regulation of Carcinogenic Volatile Organic Compound (VOCs) 2040-AF29

Clean Water Protection Rule 2040-AF30

Water - Completed Action

Title Regulation
Identifier
Number

Test Procedures for the Analysis of Co-Planar and Mono-Ortho-Substituted Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) Under the
Clean Water Act 2040-AD09

National Secondary Drinking Water Regulations (NSDWR): Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether (MTBE) and Technical
Corrections to the NSDWR 2040-AD54

Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for Chlorine and Chlorinated Hydrocarbon Manufacturing Process 2040-AE82

2010 Effluent Guidelines Program Plan 2040-AF06

Amendment to Effluent Guidelines for Primary Aluminum Smelting Subcategory of the Nonferrous Metals Manufacturing Point Source Category 2040-AF12

Withdrawal of Certain Federal Aquatic Life Water Quality Criteria Applicable to Wisconsin 2040-AF23

National Primary Drinking Water Regulations; Arsenic and Clarifications to Compliance and New Source Contaminants Monitoring (Section 610 Review) 2040-AF24

Solid Waste and Emergency Response - Proposed Rule

Title Regulation
Identifier
Number

Revisions to the National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan; Subpart J Product Schedule Listing Requirements 2050-AE87

Revising Underground Storage Tank Regulations--Revisions to Existing Requirements and New Requirements for Secondary Containment and Operator Training 2050-AG46

CERCLA/EPCRA Reporting Requirements for Air Releases of Hazardous Substances From Animal Waste at Farms 2050-AG66

Addition of Subsurface Component to the Hazard Ranking System (HRS) 2050-AG67

Revisions to the Export Requirements of the Cathode Ray Tube (CRT) Rule 2050-AG68

Solid Waste and Emergency Response - Final Rule

Title Regulation
Identifier
Number

Modifications to RCRA Rules Associated With Solvent-Contaminated Industrial Wipes 2050-AE51

Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act: Modification to the Threshold Planning Quantity Methodology for the Extremely Hazardous Substances That are Solids in Solution 2050-AF08

Hazardous Waste Technical Corrections and Clarifications Rule 2050-AG52

Hazardous Chemical Reporting; Community Right-to-Know: Revisions to the Emergency and Hazardous Chemical Inventory Forms (Tier I and Tier II) 2050-AG64

Solid Waste and Emergency Response - Long-term Action

Title Regulation
Identifier
Number

Standards for the Management of Coal Combustion Residuals Generated by Commercial Electric Power Producers 2050-AE81

RCRA Smarter Waste Reporting 2050-AF01

Hazardous Waste Manifest Revisions--Standards and Procedures for Electronic Manifests 2050-AG20

Revisions to Land Disposal Restrictions Treatment Standards and Amendments to Recycling Requirements for Spent Petroleum Refining Hydrotreating and Hydrorefining Catalysts 2050-AG34

Management Standards for Hazardous Waste Pharmaceuticals 2050-AG39

Financial Responsibility Requirements Under CERCLA Section 108(b) for Facilities in the Chemical, Petroleum andElectric Power Industries 2050-AG56

Hazardous Waste Management Systems: Identification and Listing of Hazardous Waste: Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Streams in Geological Sequestration Activities 2050-AG60

Financial Responsibility Requirements Under CERCLA Section 108(b) for Classes of Facilities in the Hard Rock Mining Industry 2050-AG61

Solid Waste and Emergency Response - Completed Action

Title Regulation
Identifier
Number

National Priorities List for Uncontrolled Hazardous Waste Sites: Proposed and Final Rules 2050-AD75

Revisions to the Comprehensive Guideline for Procurement of Products Containing Recovered Materials 2050-AE23

Correction of Errors and Adjustment of CERCLA Reportable Quantities 2050-AF03

National Contingency Plan Revisions to Align With the National Response Framework 2050-AG22

Land Disposal Restrictions: Revision of the Treatment Standard for Carbamates 2050-AG65

Air and Radiation - PreRule

Title Regulation
Identifier
Number

Revised Regulation for Environmental Radiation Protection Standard for Nuclear Power Operations 2060-AR12

Air and Radiation - Proposed Rule

Title Regulation
Identifier
Number

New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) and Emissions Guidelines (EG) Review for Municipal Solid Waste Landfills
and Amendments to NSPS and EG 2060-AM08

Standards of Performance for New Stationary Sources and Emission Guidelines for Existing Sources: Small Municipal Waste Combustors: Remand Response and Amendments 2060-AN17

Air Quality: Revision to Definition of Volatile Organic Compounds--Exclusion of a Group of Four Hydrofluoropolyethers (HFPEs) 2060-AO17

New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) and Emission Guidelines (EG) for Large Municipal Waste Combustors (MWCs). 2060-AO18

Plywood and Composite Wood Products (PCWP) NESHAP -- Proposed & Final Amendments to Address "No Emission
Reduction" MACT Floors 2060-AO66

NESHAP Subpart W: Standards for Radon Emissions From Operating Uranium Mill Tailings: Review 2060-AP26

NSPS Equipment Leaks (Subpart VV SOCMI and GGG Petroleum Refineries); Amendments 2060-AP34

In-Use Emissions Testing for Nonroad Diesel Engines and Amendments to General Compliance Provisions for Nonroad Engines 2060-AP41

Revision of Health and Environmental Protection Standards for Uranium and Thorium Mill Tailings and Uranium In Situ Leaching Processing Facilities 2060-AP43

Compliance Data Reporting Rule 2060-AP63

Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) and Nonattainment New Source Review (NSR): Reasonable Possibility in Recordkeeping; Reconsideration 2060-AP71

NESHAP Standard Standards for Petroleum Refineries--Heat Exchanger Reconsideration and Uniform Standards 2060-AP84

Federal Reference Method for Lead in Total Suspended Particulate Matter 2060-AP89

Revision of New Source Performance Standards for New Residential Wood Heaters 2060-AP93

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Startup, Shutdown, and Malfunction Amendments to Part 63
Standards 2060-AP96

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Elemental Phosphorous Production 2060-AP97

Revisions to Test Methods and Testing Regulations 2060-AQ01

Withdr.of the Prior Deter. or Presump. That Compl. w/CAIR or the NOx SIP Call Const. RACT or RACM for the 97 8-Hr Ozone & 97Fine Part. NAAQS; & Rev. to RACT Guid. & RFP Req. for the 97Fine Part. NAAQS 2060-AQ07

Risk and Technology Review for Ferroalloys Production 2060-AQ11

Residual Risk and Technology Review Amendments to the Phosphoric Acid and Phosphate Fertilizer Production
NESHAPs 2060-AQ20

Stationary Combustion Turbine NSPS Amendments to Address UARG Reconsideration Petition 2060-AQ29

Residual Risk and Technology Review Amendments to the Secondary Aluminum Production NESHAP 2060-AQ40

Risk and Technology Review for National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Pulp and Paper Industry 2060-AQ41

Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) and Nonattainment New Source Review (NSR): Reconsideration of Inclusion of Fugitive Emissions; Reconsideration 2060-AQ47Joint Rulemaking To Establish 2017 and Later Model Year Light Duty Vehicle GHG Emissions and CAFE Standards 2060-AQ54

Amendments to Delegation of Authority Provisions in the Prevention of Significant Deterioration Program 2060-AQ55

Reconsideration of Final National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines 2060-AQ58

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Hard and Decorative Chromium Electroplating, Chromium Anodizing, and Steel Pickling Residual Risk and Technology Review 2060-AQ60

Re-Proposal of Confidentiality Determinations for Eight Subparts Under the Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gases
Rule 2060-AQ70

Correction to Insert Credible Evidence Language Missing From the Compliance Certification Provisions for Operating Permits Programs 2060-AQ71

Petroleum Refinery Sector Risk and Technology Review and NSPS 2060-AQ75

Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program: Part 98 Amendments to Address Input to Emission Equation Issues 2060-AQ81

Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Listing of Substitutes for Ozone-Depleting Substances--Fire Protection 2060-AQ84

Control of Air Pollution From Motor Vehicles: Tier 3 Motor Vehicle Emission and Fuel Standards 2060-AQ86

Reconsideration of Chemical Manufacturing Area Sources National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants;
Amendments 2060-AQ89

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) Risk and Technology Review (RTR) for the Mineral Wool and Wool Fiberglass Industries 2060-AQ90

Greenhouse Gas New Source Performance Standard for Electric Generating Units for New Sources 2060-AQ91

Residual Risk and Technology Review Amendments to the Primary Aluminum Reduction NESHAP 2060-AQ92

Portland Cement Manufacturing NESHAP and NSPS--Proposed Amendments as a Result of Reconsideration 2060-AQ93

General Permits and Permits by Rule for the Tribal Minor New Source Review Program 2060-AQ95

Widespread Use for Onboard Refueling Vapor Recovery and Stage II Waiver 2060-AQ97

Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Adjustments to the Allowance System for Controlling HCFC Production, Import, and Export for 2012-2014 2060-AQ98

National Emission Standards for Aerospace Manufacturing and Rework Facilities Risk and Technology Review 2060-AQ99

Uniform Standards for Equipment Leaks and Ancillary Systems, Closed Vent Systems and Control Devices, Storage Vessels and Transfer Operations, and Wastewater Operations 2060-AR00

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutant Emissions: Group IV Polymers and Resins, Pesticide Active Ingredient Production, and Polyether Polyols Production Risk and Technology Review 2060-AR02

Revisions to Provisions Governing Alternative to Source-Specific Best Available Retrofit Technology (BART) Determinations, Limited SIP Disapprovals, and Federal Implementation Plans 2060-AR05

Addition of New Fuel Pathways Under the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS2) Program 2060-AR07

Prevention of Significant Deterioration and Title V Greenhouse Gas Tailoring Rule Step 3 2060-AR10

Federal Plan Requirements for Hospital/Medical/Infectious Waste Incinerators Constructed On or Before December 1,
2008 2060-AR11

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Major Sources: Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers and Process Heaters; Proposed Reconsideration 2060-AR13

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Area Sources: Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers; Reconsideration and Proposed Rule Amendments 2060-AR14

Standards of Performance for New Stationary Sources and Emission Guidelines for Existing Sources: Commercial and Industrial Solid Waste Incineration Units; Reconsideration and Proposed Amendments 2060-AR15

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Area Source Standards for Prepared Feeds Manufacturing —
Amendments 2060-AR16

Implementation of the 1-Hour SO2 NAAQS 2060-AR19

Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Amendment to HFO-1234yf SNAP Rule for Motor Vehicle Air Conditioning Sector 2060-AR20

Amendments to the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS2) 2060-AR21

Review of New Sources and Modifications in Indian Country; Definitions and Exempted Units and Activities 2060-AR25

Implementation of the 2008 NAAQS for Ozone: Nonattainment Area Classifications Approach, Attainment Deadlines and Revocation of the 1997 Ozone Standards for Transportation Conformity Purposes 2060-AR32

Air and Radiation - Final Rule

Title Regulation
Identifier
Number

Quality Assurance Requirements for Continuous Opacity Monitoring Systems 2060-AH23

Modification of the Anti-Dumping Baseline Date Cut-Off Limit for Data Used in Development of an Individual Baseline 2060-AJ82

Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Listing of Substitutes for Ozone-Depleting Substances: N-Propyl Bromide 2060-AK26

National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP): General Provisions; Amendments for Pollution Prevention Alternative Compliance Requirements 2060-AK54

Anti-Dumping Baseline Recalculation for Downstream Oxygenate Addition 2060-AK69

Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Amendments to the Section 608 Leak Repair Regulations 2060-AM09Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Listing of Substitutes in the Motor Vehicle Air Conditioning Sector Under the Significant New Alternatives Policy (SNAP) Program 2060-AM54

Component Durability Procedures for New Light Duty Vehicles, Light Duty Trucks & Heavy Duty Vehicles 2060-AN01

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP): Polyvinyl Chloride and Copolymers Production,
Amendments 2060-AN33

Requirements for Reformulated Gasoline (RFG) Under the 8-Hour Ozone Standard for Bump-up Areas Designated
Attainment for the 1-hour Ozone Standard Prior to Revocation 2060-AN63

NESHAP: Mercury Cell Chlor-Alkali Plants--Amendments 2060-AN99

Revision of Hearing-Protector Regulations 2060-AO25

Amendment of Definitions for National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Pollutants for Radionuclides 2060-AO31

Adoption of International NOx Standard for Aircraft Engines 2060-AO70

Review of the Secondary National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Oxides of Nitrogen and Oxides of Sulfur 2060-AO72

Implementation of the 1997 8-Hr Ozone NAAQS: Classification of Subpart 1 Areas and Revision to AntiBacksliding Provisions; Deletion of Obsolete 1-Hr Ozone Standard Provisions 2060-AO96

Revisions to Test Method for Determining Stack Gas Velocity Taking Into Account Velocity Decay Near the Stack Walls 2060-AP08

Ambient Ozone Monitoring Regulations: Revisions to Network Design Requirements 2060-AP15

Implementation of the 1997 8-hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard: NSR Anti-Backsliding 2060-AP30

Air Quality Designations and Classifications for the 2008 Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards 2060-AP37

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From Coal- and Oil-Fired Electric Utility Steam Generating Units and Standards of Performance for Electric Utility Steam Generating Units 2060-AP52

Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Listing of Substitutes for Ozone-Depleting Substances-Hydrocarbon Refrigerants 2060-AP54

Transportation Conformity Rule Restructuring Amendments 2060-AP57

Oil and Natural Gas Sector--New Source Performance Standards and National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants 2060-AP76

Reconsideration of the Prevention of Significant Deterioration and Nonattainment New Source Review (NSR): Aggregation 2060-AP80

Review of New Source Performance Standards for Nitric Acid Plants--Subpart G 2060-AQ10

Supplemental Determinations for Renewable Fuels Produced Under the Final RFS2 Program From Palm Oil 2060-AQ36

Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Extension of Global Laboratory and Analytical Use Exemption for Essential Class I Ozone Depleting Substances 2060-AQ39

Performance Specification 4C--Specifications and Test Procedures for Low-level Carbon Monoxide Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems in Stationary Sources 2060-AQ51

Reasonable Further Progress Requirements for the 1997 8-Hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard 2060-AQ65

Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: The 2012 Critical Use Exemption From the Phaseout of Methyl Bromide 2060-AQ83

Transportation Conformity Rule: MOVES Regional Grace Period Extension 2060-AR03

Air Quality Designations for the 2010 Nitrogen Dioxide National Ambient Air Quality Standards 2060-AR06

Air Quality Designations for the 2010 Sulfur Dioxide Primary National Ambient Air Quality Standard 2060-AR18

Revisions to Federal Implementation Plans to Reduce Interstate Transport of Fine Particulate Matter and Ozone 2060-AR22

Air and Radiation - Long-term Action

Title Regulation
Identifier
Number

National Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) Emission Standards for Consumer Products; Amendments 2060-AI62

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Stationary Combustion Turbines--Petition to Delist 2060-AK73

Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Process for Exempting Emergency Uses of Methyl Bromide 2060-AL94

Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Certification of Recovery and Recovery/Recycling Equipment Intended for Use With Substitute Refrigerants 2060-AM49

Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Modifications to the Technician Certification Requirements Under Section 608 of the
Clean Air Act 2060-AM55

Federal Plan Requirements for Other Solid Waste Incineration Units Constructed on or Before December 9, 2004 2060-AN43

Petroleum Refineries--New Source Performance Standards (NSPS)--Subparts J and Ja 2060-AN72

Improving Implementation of the Operating Permit Rules in Response to CAAA Committee Recommendations 2060-AN93

Review of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particulate Matter 2060-AO47

New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) Review Under CAA Section 111(b)(1)(B) 2060-AO60

Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Labeling of Products Using HCFCs 2060-AO68

Protection of the Stratospheric Ozone: Motor Vehicle Air Conditioning System Servicing 2060-AO75

New Source Performance Standards for Grain Elevators--Amendments 2060-AP06Response to Section 126 Petition From Warrick County, Indiana and the Town of Newburgh, Indiana 2060-AP21

Revision to Definition of Volatile Organic Compounds--Exclusion of Methyl Iodide (And Possibly Methyl Bromide) 2060-AP22

Review of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ozone 2060-AP38

Response to Section 126 Petition From North Carolina 2060-AP51

Response to Section 126 Petition From Delaware 2060-AP60

Alternative Work Practices for Leak Detection and Repair, Amendments 2060-AP66

NESHAP: Brick and Structural Clay Products and Clay Products 2060-AP69

Lead Emissions From Piston-Engine Aircraft Using Leaded Aviation Gasoline 2060-AP79

National VOC Emission Standards for Architectural Coatings; Amendments 2060-AP94

Reconsideration of the 2008 Ozone Primary and Secondary National Ambient Air Quality Standards 2060-AP98

Method 16C for the Determination of Total Reduced Sulfur Emissions From Stationary Sources 2060-AQ23

Revision to Definition of Volatile Organic Compounds--Exclusion of trans 1,3,3,3-tetrafluoropropene and 2,3,3,3- tertrafluoropropene 2060-AQ38

Review of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Lead 2060-AQ44

Clean Air Fine Particle Implementation Rule Revision for PM2.5 NAAQS 2060-AQ48

Supplemental Determination for Renewable Fuels Produced Under the Final RFS2 Program From Pulpwood 2060-AQ49

Supplemental Determination for Renewable Fuels Produced Under the Final RFS2 Program From Sorghum 2060-AQ64

Standards of Performance for New Stationary Sources and Emission Guidelines for Existing Sources: Other Solid Waste
Incineration Units 2060-AQ72

Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Adjustments to the Allowance System for Controlling HCFC Production, Import, and Export for 2015-2019 2060-AR04

Greenhouse Gas New Source Performance Standard for Electric Generating Units-Emission Guidelines for Existing
Sources 2060-AR33

Air and Radiation - Completed Action

Title Regulation
Identifier
Number

NSPS: SOCMI--Wastewater and Amendment to Appendix C of Part 63 and Appendix J of Part 60 2060-AE94

Review of New Sources and Modifications in Indian Country 2060-AH37

Review of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Carbon Monoxide 2060-AI43

Performance Specifications for Continuous Parameter Monitoring Systems 2060-AJ86

Performance-Based Measurement System For Fuels: Criteria For Self-Qualifying Alternative Test Methods; Description of Optional Statistical Quality Control Measures 2060-AK03

Lifting the Stay of the Eight-Hour Portion of the Findings of Significant Contribution and Rulemaking for Purposes of Reducing Interstate Ozone Transport ("NOx SIP Call") 2060-AL84

Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Revision to Listing of Carbon Dioxide Total Flooding Fire Extinguishing Systems Restricting Use to Only Unoccupied Areas 2060-AN30

Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Amending Requirements to Import Ozone-Depleting Substances for Destruction in
the U.S. 2060-AN48

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Shipbuilding and Ship Repair (Surface Coating) Operations--
Amendment 2060-AO03

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP): Miscellaneous Organic Chemical Manufacturing--
Amendments 2060-AO07

Commercial and Industrial Solid Waste Incineration Units; Response to Remand of New Source Performance Standards
and Emission Guidelines 2060-AO12

Measurement of PM 2.5 and PM 10 Emissions by Dilution Sampling 2060-AO50

Addition of Method 208, Protocol for the Source Testing, Analysis, and Reporting of VOC Emissions From Hot Mix Asphalt Plant Dryers 2060-AO51

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Appendix A--Test Methods; Amendments to Method 301 2060-AO53

Petroleum Refinery Residual Risk Standards 2060-AO55

NESHAP: Marine Tank Vessel Loading Operations; Printing and Publishing; Pharmaceuticals Production and Group I Polymers and Resins 2060-AO91

Prevention of Air Pollution Emergency Episodes 2060-AP00

Regulation of Fuel and Fuel Additives: Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Test Methods (Alternative Test Method for Olefins in Gasoline) 2060-AP17

Implementation of the 2011 National Ambient Air Quality Standard for Ozone and Anti-Backsliding Requirements for the Section 185 Fee Program for Purposes of the 1-hour Ozone NAAQS 2060-AP24

NESHAP: Group I and IV Polymers and Resins: Amendments 2060-AP25

Federal Implementation Plans: Interstate Transport of Fine Particulate Matter and Ozone and Correction of SIP Approvals 2060-AP50Control of Greenhouse Gas Emissions From Medium and Heavy-Duty Vehicles 2060-AP61

Compression Ignition Engine NSPS--Amendments 2060-AP67

Implementing the 1997 8-hour Ozone NAAQS: Section 185 Penalty Fee Provisions 2060-AP68

Proposal to Revise the Interpollutant Trading Policy for PM2.5 Offsets 2060-AP72

Implementation of the New Source Review (NSR) Program for Particulate Matter Less Than 2.5 Micrometers (PM2.5); Final Rule to Repeal Grandfather Provision 2060-AP75

Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: The 2011 Critical Use Exemption From the Phaseout of Methyl Bromide 2060-AP92

Revisions to Motor Vehicle Fuel Economy Label 2060-AQ09

Regulation to Prevent the Misfueling of Vehicles and Engines With Gasoline Containing Greater Than Ten Volume Percent Ethanol and Modifications to the Reformulated and Conventional Gasoline Programs 2060-AQ17

Standards of Performance for New Stationary Sources and Emissions Guidelines for Existing Sources: Hospital/Medical/Infectious Waste Incinerators; Amendments 2060-AQ24

New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) Review for Petroleum Refineries (Subpart J)--Response to
Reconsideration--Other Issues 2060-AQ28

Risk and Technology Review NESHAP for Shipbuilding and Ship Repair (Surface Coating) and Wood Furniture Manufacturing 2060-AQ42

NESHAP for Primary Lead Smelting 2060-AQ43

Transport Rule to Address 2008 Ozone Standards 2060-AQ57

Determinations Concerning Need for Error Correction, Partial Approval and Partial Disapproval, and Federal Implementation Plan Regarding Texas Prevention of Significant Deterioration Program 2060-AQ66

Residual Risk and Technology Review for Secondary Lead Smelters NESHAP 2060-AQ68

Response to the September 2010 Section 126 Petition From New Jersey Regarding SO2 Emissions From the Portland Generating Station 2060-AQ69

Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) and Nonattainment New Source Review (NSR): Reconsideration of Inclusion of Fugitive Emissions; Stay and Revisions 2060-AQ73

Amendments to National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Area Sources: Plating and Polishing: Direct Final Rule 2060-AQ74

2012 Renewable Fuel Volume Standards as Required by Energy Independence and Security Act 2060-AQ76

Updating Cross-References for the Oklahoma State Implementation Plan 2060-AQ77

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Stationary Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines;
Amendments 2060-AQ78

Deferral of Application of the Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) and Title V Programs to CO2 Emissions From Bioenergy and Other Biogenic Sources 2060-AQ79

Change to the Reporting Date for Certain Data Elements Required Under the Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse
Gases Rule 2060-AQ80

Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Adjustments to the Allowance System for Controlling HCFC Production, Import, and Export for 2011 2060-AQ82

2011 Technical Corrections, Clarifying and Other and Amendments to Certain Provisions of the Mandatory Reporting of
Greenhouse Gases Rule 2060-AQ85

Final Regulation Extending the Reporting Deadline for Year 2010 Data Elements Required Under the Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gases Rule 2060-AQ87

Clarifications to Indian Tribes' Clean Air Act Regulatory Requirements; Direct Final Amendments 2060-AQ94

• Federal Implementation Plans for IA, KS, MI, MO, OK, and WI to Reduce Interstate Transport of Ozone 2060-AR01

Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gases: Revisions to Best Available Monitoring Method Provisions 2060-AR08

Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule: Technical Revisions for Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems and Electronics Manufacturing 2060-AR09

Air Quality Designations for the 2008 Lead National Ambient Air Quality Standards: Second Round 2060-AR17

Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gases: Additional Sources of Fluorinated GHGs: Extension of Best Available Monitoring Provisions for Electronics Manufacturing 2060-AR23

Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gases: Natural Gas and Petroleum Systems: Extension of BAMM Provisions 2060-AR24

Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gases: Changes to Provisions for Electronics Manufacturing (Subpart I) to Provide Flexibility 2060-AR26

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances - Proposed Rule

Title Regulation
Identifier
Number

Test Rule; Multiple Substance Rule for the Testing of Developmental and Reproductive Toxicity 2070-AD44

Testing Agreement for Aryl Phosphates (ITC List 2) 2070-AJ07

Certain Polybrominated Diphenyl Ethers; Significant New Use Rule (SNUR) and Test Rule 2070-AJ08

Pesticides; Certification of Pesticide Applicators 2070-AJ20

Pesticides; Agricultural Worker Protection Standard Revisions 2070-AJ22

Prions; Amendment of EPA’s Regulatory Definition of Pests to Include Prion2070-AJ26

Pesticides; Data Requirements for Plant-Incorporated Protectants (PIPs) and Certain Exemptions for PIPs 2070-AJ27

Pesticides; Expansion of Crop Grouping Program 2070-AJ28

Regulations to Facilitate Compliance With the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act by Producers of PlantIncorporated Protectants (PIPs) 2070-AJ32

Nonylphenol (NP) and its Ethoxylates (NPE); Significant New Use Rule & Test Rule 2070-AJ34

Formaldehyde; Third-Party Certification Framework for the Formaldehyde Standards for Composite Wood Products 2070-AJ44

Mercury; Regulation of Use in Certain Products 2070-AJ46

Nanoscale Materials; Test Rule for Certain Nanoscale Materials 2070-AJ47

Nanoscale Materials; Chemical Substances When Manufactured, Imported, or Processed as Nanoscale Materials; Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements; Significant New Use Rule 2070-AJ54

Lead; Renovation, Repair, and Painting Program for Public and Commercial Buildings 2070-AJ56

Pesticides; Clarifying Changes to Labeling 2070-AJ61

TSCA Reporting Requirements; Revisions 2070-AJ63

Lead Wheel Weights; Regulatory Investigation 2070-AJ64

Microorganisms: General Exemptions From Reporting Requirements; Revisions of Recipient Organisms Eligible for Tier I and Tier II Exemptions 2070-AJ65

High Production Volume (HPV) Chemicals; 4th Group of Chemicals 2070-AJ66

Chemicals of Concern List Under Section 5(b)(4) of the Toxic Substances Control Act 2070-AJ70

Significant New Use Rule (SNUR); Benzidine-Based Dyes; Di-n-pentyl phthalate (DnPP); and Alkanes, C12-13, Chloro 2070-AJ73

Electronic Reporting Under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) 2070-AJ75

Pesticides; Revisions to Minimum Risk Exemptions 2070-AJ79

CBI: PMN Amendments Claiming Chemical and Microorganism Identity as Confidential in Data From Health and Safety
Studies Submitted Under TSCA Prior to the Commencement of Manufacture 2070-AJ87

Significant New Use Rule (SNUR); HBCD (Hexabromocyclododecane) Used in Textiles 2070-AJ88

Cadmium; Health and Safety Data Reporting Under TSCA Section 8(d) 2070-AJ89

Significant New Use Rule for Toluene Diisocyanates (TDI) 2070-AJ91

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances - Final Rule

Title Regulation
Identifier
Number

Groundwater and Pesticide Management Plan Rule 2070-AC46

Pesticides; Registration Requirements for Antimicrobial Pesticide Products 2070-AD14

High Production Volume (HPV) Chemicals; 1st Group of Chemicals 2070-AD16

Pesticides; Data Requirements for Antimicrobials 2070-AD30

Plant Incorporated Protectants (PIPs); Exemption for Those Derived Through Genetic Engineering From Sexually Compatible Plants 2070-AD55

Plant Incorporated Protectants (PIPs); Exemption for PIPs That Act by Primarily Affecting the Plant 2070-AD56

Mercury; Incorporation of Revised ASTM Standards Into EPA Regulations That Provide Flexibility in the Use of Alternatives to Mercury-Containing Thermometers 2070-AJ51

Pesticides; Regulation to Clarify Labeling of Pesticides for Export 2070-AJ53

Pesticides; Satisfaction of Data Requirements; Minor Revisions to the Procedures to Ensure Protection of Data Submitters' Rights 2070-AJ58

Mercury; Significant New Use Rule; Elemental Mercury Used in Barometers, Manometers, and Hygrometers/Psychrometers 2070-AJ71

Protections for Subjects in Human Research Involving Pesticides 2070-AJ76

Synchronizing the Expiration Dates of EPA Pesticide Applicator Certificates With the Underlying State or Tribal Applicator Certificate 2070-AJ77

Pesticides; Microbial Pesticide Definitions and Applicability; Clarification and Availability of New Test Guideline 2070-AJ80

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances - Long-term Action

Title Regulation
Identifier
Number

Lead Fishing Sinkers; Manufacturing, Processing, and Distribution in Commerce 2070-AC21

Plant Incorporated Protectants (PIPs); Exemption for Those Based on Viral Coat Protein Genes 2070-AD49

Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs); Reassessment of Use Authorizations 2070-AJ38Pesticides; Reconsideration of Exemptions for Insect Repellents 2070-AJ45

Pesticides; Data Requirements for Product Performance 2070-AJ49

Significant New Use Rule for Glymes 2070-AJ52

Pesticides; Public Availability of Identities of Inert Ingredients in Pesticides 2070-AJ62

Short-Chained Chlorinated Paraffins (SCCPs); Regulation(s) Under TSCA 2070-AJ69

Long-Chain Perfluorinated Chemicals (LCPFCs); Regulation(s) Under TSCA 2070-AJ72

Lead Dust Hazard Standards 2070-AJ82

Testing of Bisphenol A (BPA) 2070-AJ83

CBI; Reassertion and Resubstantiation of Confidentiality Claims Submitted Under TSCA 2070-AJ90

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances - Completed Action

Title Regulation
Identifier
Number

TSCA Section 8(a) Preliminary Assessment Information Rules 2070-AB08

TSCA Section 8(d) Health and Safety Data Reporting Rules 2070-AB11

Testing of Existing Chemicals (Overview Entry for Future Needs) 2070-AB94

Asbestos Model Accreditation Plan Revisions 2070-AC51

Pesticides; Tolerance Processing Fees 2070-AJ23

Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs); Placeholder for Petitions Seeking a Manufacturing (Import) Exemption for Use 2070-AJ39

TSCA Inventory Update Reporting Modifications 2070-AJ43

Electronic Reporting of Chemical Import Data in the Automated Commercial Environment (ACE) 2070-AJ50

Lead; Clearance and Clearance Testing Requirements for the Renovation, Repair, and Painting Program 2070-AJ57

Exemption for Plant Virus Derived Plant-Incorporated Protectants (PVCP-PIPs) In Hawaiian Papaya Line 55-1 and Squash Lines CZW-3 and ZW-20 2070-AJ84

High Production Volume (HPV) Chemicals; 3rd Group of Chemicals 2070-AJ86

Office of the Administrator - Proposed Rule

Title Regulation
Identifier
Number

Part 7--Nondiscrimination in Programs or Activities Receiving Federal Assistance From the Environmental Protection Agency 2090-AA39

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Regional Office Chicago ( ROCHICAGO ) RIN: 2005-AA02

View Related Documents

Title: Withdrawal of Federal Water Quality Guidance for the Great Lakes System for Michigan

Abstract: On August 4, 2000, EPA specified at 40 CFR 132.6(c) that certain requirements set forth in the Water Quality Guidance for the Great Lakes System (Guidance) at 40 CFR part 132 apply to discharges within the Great Lakes System in the states of Indiana, Michigan, and Ohio because those states had not adopted requirements pertaining to whole effluent toxicity (WET) consistent with the Guidance. On September 19, 2005, Michigan submitted to EPA revisions to the rules that addressed WET requirements. By letter dated December 27, 2005, EPA found that Michigan's revised regulations were consistent with the Guidance, and therefore, approved the WET rule revisions. Michigan adopted the WET regulations into state rule on January 13, 2006. As a result, EPA is proposing to amend 40 CFR 132.6(c) to remove the reference to Michigan.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 132.6(c) (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: Not Yet Determined Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Direct Final Action 12/00/2011

NPRM 12/00/2011

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: NoSmall Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No Agency Contact: Robert Pepin Environmental Protection Agency Regional Office Chicago
WT-15J Chicago , IL 60604
Phone: 312 886-1505
FAX: 312 886-0168
E-Mail: Pepin.Robert@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Louis Eby Environmental Protection Agency Regional Office Chicago
4203M Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-6599
E-Mail: Eby.Louis@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Regional Office Dallas ( RODALLAS ) RIN: 2006-AA00

View Related Documents

Title: Oklahoma Regional Haze Federal Implementation Plan (FIP)

Abstract: On December 28, 2011, EPA took final action for a Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) to limit air emissions whichcause "Regional Haze" from six units located at three coal-burning power plants in Oklahoma. Operators of these oldest coalfired power plants will be required to meet reduced sulfur dioxide (SO2) emission limits within the next five years. After considering comments from industry and other stakeholders on our proposed FIP about the difficulty of meeting the standards in three years, EPA extended the compliance period to five years, the maximum allowed by the Clean Air Act [CAA, or Act]. These plants were built more than 30 years ago, and the CAA requires them to take practical steps to modernize their pollution controls and reduce their haze impacts on visibility in pristine areas of the country. The purpose of the FIP is to establish SO2 Best Available Retrofit Technology (BART) requirements of the Regional Haze program, and ensure that emissions from Oklahoma sources do not interfere with the visibility in other states. EPA expects these new limits to reduce emissions of SO2 from the plants by about 95 percent, resulting in a reduction of approximately 61,000 tons of SO2 per year. These three power plants emit greater than one-third (36%) of all the SO2 pollution from the hundreds of industrial and utility sources in Oklahoma.

Priority: Info./Admin./Other Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 52 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7410(c)(1) Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

Other Judicial Court-ordered consent decree deadline. 12/13/2011

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 03/22/2011 76 FR 16168

Final Action 12/28/2011 76 FR 81727

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: Undetermined Agency Contact: Guy Donaldson Environmental Protection Agency Regional Office Dallas
6PD-L Dallas , TX 75223
Phone: 214 665-7242
E-Mail: Donaldson.Guy@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Joe Kordzi Environmental Protection Agency Regional Office Dallas
6PD-L Dallas , TX 75223
Phone: 214 665-7186
E-Mail: Kordzi.Joe@epamail.epa.govEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA) Regional Office San Francisco ( ROSANFRAN ) RIN: 2009-AA04

View Related Documents

Title: Regulation To Establish No Discharge Zone in California State Waters Under CWA 312(f)(4)(A)

Abstract: Based upon a 2005 California law, the State Water Resources Control Board asked EPA to designate California waters as a No Discharge Zone (NDZ) for sewage from cruise ships and ocean-going vessels with adequate holding capacity. The State, local environmental groups, and California delegation all strongly support establishment of such an NDZ, as it would offer additional water quality protection to the California coast. There are two novel aspects of this proposed NDZ. All existing NDZs prohibit all sewage from all vessels; however, the California request applies to only a subset of all vessels. No existing NDZ established under 312(f)(4)(A) applies to all state waters either. Only two NDZs have been established under 312(f)(4)(A): Minnesota Boundary Waters Canoe Area and Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 140 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: CWA 312(f)(4)(A) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 09/02/2010 75 FR 53914

NPRM Comment Period End 11/01/2010

Final Action 01/00/2012

Additional Information: SAN No. 5413

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No Agency Contact: Allan Ota Environmental Protection Agency Regional Office San Francisco

San Francisco , CA 94105
Phone: 415 972-3476
E-Mail: ota.allan@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Regional Office Seattle ( ROSEATTLE ) RIN: 2012-AA02

View Related Documents

Title: Revisions to Federal Implementation Plans Under the CAA for Indian Country in Idaho, Oregon and Washington

Abstract: After five years of experience implementing the Federal Air Rules for Reservations, EPA plans to revise the original rules to apply to all Indian Country, including new reservations in the Pacific NW. EPA also plans to revise the rules to align more with implementation and to better address sources of air pollution on Indian Reservations in Idaho, Oregon, and Washington.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: Not Yet Determined Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 01/00/2012

Final Action 04/00/2012

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0373

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State; Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: NoEnergy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.epa.gov/r10earth/FARR.htm Agency Contact: Anne Dalrymple Environmental Protection Agency Regional Office Seattle
OAWT 107 Seattle , WA 98101
Phone: 206 553-6313
E-Mail: Dalrymple.Anne@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Justin Spenillo Environmental Protection Agency Regional Office Seattle
OAWT 107 Seattle , WA 98101
Phone: 206 553-6125
E-Mail: Spenillo.Justin@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of General Council ( OGC ) RIN: 2015-AA00

View Related Documents

Title: Revision of Procedural Rules for Hearings on Cancellations, Suspensions, Changes in Classifications, and Denials of Pesticide Registrations

Abstract: EPA is preparing a revision of the Rules of Practice governing the conduct of licensing adjudications under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA). The existing Rules of Practice were originally promulgated by EPA in 1973. In the subsequent 35 years, Congress has substantially amended FIFRA, creating a number of additional types of licensing adjudications which are not expressly provided for in the existing Rules of Practice. In order to include provisions tailored to these new types of proceedings, and to incorporate the standard practices which have evolved and the precedents which have been established since these rules were first promulgated, EPA intends to revise the FIFRA Rules of Practice.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 164 (revision) (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 7 USC 136a(c) to 136a(d); 7 USC 136b(d) to 136b(f); 7 USC 136d(b) to 7 USC 136d(e); 7 USC 136w(a) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Action 00/00/0000

NPRM 04/00/2012

Additional Information: Previous listed as RIN 2020-AA44.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 112; 111; 32532

Related RINs: Previously Reported as 2020-AA44 Agency Contact: Scott Garrison Environmental Protection Agency
Office of General Council
2333A Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-4047
FAX: 202 564-5644
E-Mail: Garrison.Scott@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Robert Perlis Environmental Protection Agency
Office of General Council
2333A Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-5636
FAX: 202 564-5644
E-Mail: perlis.robert@epamail.epa.govEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of General Council ( OGC ) RIN: 2015-AA01

View Related Documents

Title: Supplemental Standards of Ethical Conduct for Employees of the Environmental Protection Agency

Abstract: The Environmental Protection Agency will, with the concurrence of the Office of Government Ethics (OGE), revise the Supplemental Standards of Ethical Conduct for Employees of the Environmental Protection Agency (regulation) at 5 CFR part 6401. The regulation supplements the Standards of Ethical Conduct for Employees of the Executive Branch (Standards) issued by OGE. The revisions to the regulation are necessary to update, clarify, and address ethical issues unique to EPA employees. The regulation prohibits certain EPA employees from holding certain financial interests, including compensated outside employment with certain persons; and it requires EPA employees to obtain prior approval to engage in certain categories of outside employment.

Priority: Info./Admin./Other Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 5 CFR 6401(revision) (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 5 USC 7301 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Action 12/00/2011

Additional Information: SAN No. 5291.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No Agency Contact: Jennie Keith Environmental Protection Agency
Office of General Council
2310A Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-3412
E-Mail: Keith.Jennie@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Justina Fugh Environmental Protection Agency
Office of General Council
2310A Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-1786
E-Mail: fugh.justina@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance ( OECA ) RIN: 2020-AA47

View Related Documents

Title: NPDES Electronic Reporting Rule

Abstract: The EPA has responsibility to ensure that the Clean Water Act's (CWA) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program is effectively and consistently implemented across the country. This regulation would identify the essential information that EPA needs to receive electronically, primarily from NPDES permittees with some data required from NPDES agencies (NPDES-authorized States, territories, and tribes) to manage the national NPDES permitting and enforcement program. Through this regulation, EPA seeks to ensure that such facility-specific information would be readily available, accurate, timely, and nationally consistent on the facilities that are regulated by the NPDES program. In the past, EPA primarily obtained this information from the Permit Compliance System (PCS). However, the evolution of the NPDES program since the inception of PCS has created an increasing need to better reflect a more complete picture of the NPDES program and the diverse universe of regulated sources. In addition, information technology has advanced significantly so that PCS no longer meets EPA's national needs to manage the full scope of the NPDES program or the needs of individual States that use PCS to implement and enforce the NPDES program.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 123, 403, and 501 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: CWA secs 304(i) and 501(a), 33 USC 1314(i) and 1361(a) Legal Deadline: NoneRegulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: As the NPDES program and information technology have evolved in the past several decades, the Permit Compliance System (PCS)--EPA's NPDES national data system, which has been in use since 1985--has become increasingly ineffective in meeting the full scope of EPA's and individual States' needs to manage, direct, oversee, and report on the implementation and enforcement of the NPDES program. Therefore, a NPDES component of EPA's existing Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS), ICIS-NPDES, was designed and constructed based upon EPA and State input to manage data for the full breadth of the NPDES program. This rulemaking would identify essential NPDES-specific information EPA needs to receive from NPDES agencies (authorized States and tribes, as well as EPA regions). This information would be sought in a format compatible with the new NPDES component of the Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS) in order to better enable EPA to ensure the protection of public health and the environment, effectively manage the national NPDES permitting and enforcement program, identify and address environmental problems, and ultimately replace PCS. This action would be of interest primarily to NPDES permittees, NPDES-authorized States, and to the public at large, which would ultimately have increased access to this NPDES information.

Legal Basis: In 1972, Congress passed the Clean Water Act to "restore and maintain the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of the Nation's waters." 33 U.S.C. 1251(a). The Clean Water Act established a comprehensive program for protecting and restoring our Nation's waters. The Clean Water Act prohibits the discharge of pollutants from a point source to waters of the United States except when authorized by a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. The Clean Water Act established the NPDES permit program to authorize and regulate the discharges of pollutants to waters of the United States. EPA has issued comprehensive regulations that implement the NPDES program at 40 CFR parts 122 to 125, 129 to 133, 136, and subpart N. Under the NPDES permit program, point sources subject to regulation may discharge pollutants to waters of the United States subject to the terms and conditions of an NPDES permit. With very few exceptions (40 CFR 122.3), point sources require NPDES permit authorization to discharge, including both municipal and industrial discharges. NPDES permit authorization may be provided under an individual NPDES permit, which is developed after a process initiated by a permit application (40 CFR 122.21), or under a general NPDES permit, which among other things, applies to one or more categories of dischargers (e.g., oil and gas facilities, seafood processors) with the same or substantially similar types of operations and the same effluent limitations, operating conditions, or standards for sewage sludge use or disposal. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has the primary responsibility to ensure that the NPDES program is effectively and consistently implemented across the country, thus ensuring that public health and environmental protection goals of the CWA are met. Many States and some territories have received authorization to implement and enforce the NPDES program, and EPA works with its State partners to ensure effective program implementation and enforcement. CWA section 304(i)(2) directs EPA to promulgate guidelines establishing the minimum procedural and other elements of a State, territory, or tribal NPDES program, including monitoring requirements; reporting requirements (including procedures to make information available to the public); enforcement provisions; and funding, personnel qualifications, and manpower requirements [CWA sec. 304(i)(2)]. EPA published NPDES State, territory, and tribal program regulations under CWA section 304(i)(2) at 40 CFR part 123. Among other things, the part 123 regulations specify NPDES program requirements for permitting, compliance evaluation programs, enforcement authority, sharing of information, transmission of information to EPA, and noncompliance and program reporting to EPA. This proposed rulemaking may add some specificity to those particular regulations regarding what NPDES information is required to be submitted to EPA by States and may modify other regulations to require electronic reporting of NPDES information by NPDES permittees to the States and EPA.

Alternatives: For this proposed rulemaking, EPA has determined that the need for EPA's receipt of such NPDES information exists. If, for whatever reason, electronic reporting by permittees is not a feasible option for certain NPDES information, the obvious alternative would be for EPA to require States to provide that information to EPA. The States already receive that information from the permittees, and therefore, they have the information that EPA seeks. Within the rulemaking process itself, various alternatives are under consideration based on the feasibility of particular electronic reporting options. For example, EPA may consider establishing requirements for electronic reporting of discharge monitoring reports by NPDES permittees. Under this proposed rulemaking, EPA may consider establishing similar requirements for any or all of the following types of NPDES information: Notices of Intent to discharge (for facilities seeking coverage under general permits), permitting information (including permit applications), various program reports (e.g., pretreatment compliance reports from approved local pretreatment programs, annual reports from concentrated animal feeding operations, biosolids reports, sewage overflow incident reports, annual reports for pesticide applicators, annual reports for municipal stormwater systems), and annual compliance certifications. Some States might also raise the possibility of supplying only summary-level information to EPA rather than facility-specific information to EPA. Based upon considerable experience, EPA considers such alternative non-facility-specific data to be insufficient to meet its needs, except in very particular situations or reports. One alternative that EPA may consider for rule implementation is whether third-party vendors may be better equipped to develop and modify such electronic reporting tools
than EPA.

Costs and Benefits: The economic analysis for this proposed rulemaking has not yet been completed; therefore, the dollar values of estimated costs and benefits are not yet known. However, some generalizations can still be made regarding expectations. EPA anticipates that electronic reporting of discharge monitoring reports (DMRs) by NPDES permittees will provide significant data entry cost savings for States and EPA. These discharge monitoring reports are already required to be submitted by NPDES permittees to States and EPA, which in turn currently enter that information into the State NPDES data system or EPA's national NPDES data system. These discharge monitoring reports contain significant amounts of information regarding pollutants discharged, identified concentrations and quantities of pollutants, discharge locations, etc. Through electronic reporting by permittees, States and EPA will no longer have associated data entry costs to enter this information. Electronic reporting by NPDES permittees of other NPDES information (such as notices of intent to discharge or various program reports) may also yield considerable data entry savings to the States and EPA. In addition, some States have beenable to quantify savings by the permittees to electronically report their NPDES information using existing electronic reporting tools. Such savings are being examined in the economic analysis process for this rulemaking. Additional benefits of this rule will likely include improved transparency of information regarding the NPDES program, improved information regarding the national NPDES program, improved targeting of resources and enforcement based on identified program needs and noncompliance problems, and ultimately improved protection of public health and the environment. Some NPDES information will need to be reported by States to EPA; therefore, there will be some data entry costs associated with that information, but it will likely be far less than the savings that will be realized by States through electronic reporting by NPDES permittees. In addition, EPA will likely have sizable costs to develop tools for electronic reporting by permittees, as well as operation and maintenance costs
associated with those tools.

Risks: Given the scope of this proposed rulemaking, the most significant risks associated with this effort may be those if EPA does not proceed with this rulemaking. At this point, EPA does not receive sufficient NPDES information from the States to be able to fully assess the implementation of the national NPDES program nor the smaller subprograms. Such information is not currently required by EPA from the States, and the lack of such reporting requirements perpetuates this problem. Furthermore, EPA does not have facility-specific information regarding most of the facilities regulated under the NPDES program, and therefore, EPA cannot easily identify potential implementation problems or noncompliance problems. This lack of information may adversely impact EPA's ability to better ensure the protection of public health and the environment, nationally and locally. A potential risk associated with this rule may involve EPA efforts to develop electronic reporting tools for use by permittees. The costs associated with the internal development of such tools, possibly for multiple types of NPDES information from various types of NPDES permittees, and the future costs of operation and maintenance may be substantial for EPA, possibly impacting the availability of funding for other purposes. Furthermore, EPA would also need to determine the feasibility of ensuring that the electronic tools can be flexible enough to meet state needs and work well with State data systems. Problems in the development and maintenance of these electronic tools could pose significant risks for the effective implementation of this rule.

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite
Notice - Public Meeting 07/01/2010 75 FR 38068
Notice - Public Meeting 2 06/23/2011 76 FR 36919

NPRM 12/00/2011

Final Action 09/00/2012

Additional Information: SAN No. 5251

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: Yes Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.regulations.gov/exchange/topic/npdes Agency Contact: Andrew Hudock Environmental Protection Agency Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance

2222A Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-6032
E-Mail: Hudock.Andrew@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: John Dombrowski Environmental Protection Agency Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance

2222A Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-0742
E-Mail: Dombrowski.John@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance ( OECA ) RIN: 2020-AA49

View Related Documents

Title: Technical Corrections to Title 40 to Conform to the Civil Monetary Penalty Inflation Adjustment Rule

Abstract: On December 11, 2008, EPA promulgated the 2008 Civil Monetary Penalty Inflation Adjustment Rule (73 FR 75340) to adjust all statutory civil monetary penalties for inflation. This rule was issued pursuant to the Debt Collection Improvement Act (DCIA), which requires each federal agency to adjust statutory penalty amounts under its jurisdiction to account for inflation. During the course of that rulemaking, EPA discovered that certain regulatory provisions of title 40 referred to outdated statutory civil penalty amounts. This rulemaking will amend all regulatory references to specific civil penalty amounts to refer to the operative effective statutory maximum penalty amount reflected in 40 CFR 19.4.

Priority: Info./Admin./Other Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: NoCFR Citation: 40 CFR 19.4 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 31 USC 3701 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Direct Final Action 09/00/2012

Additional Information: SAN No. 5325.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No Agency Contact: David Abdalla Environmental Protection Agency Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance
2248A Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-2413
E-Mail: Abdalla.David@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Susan O'Keefe Environmental Protection Agency Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance
2248A Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-4021
E-Mail: OKeefe.Susan@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Environmental Information ( OEI ) RIN: 2025-AA11

View Related Documents

Title: Modification of Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) Reporting Requirements Primarily Associated With Metal Mining

Abstract: The Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) currently requires reporting from metal mining facilities if they manufacture or process 25,000 pounds or more of a listed chemical or otherwise use 10,000 pounds or more of a listed chemical. These mining facilities engage in the removal of naturally occurring materials from the earth. EPA had considered naturally occurring materials to be manufactured by natural processes. A recent court order set aside EPA's interpretation of manufacture in the mining context, stating that naturally occurring ores in situ have not been manufactured within the meaning of Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Act (EPCRA) section 313. EPA is considering clarifying how the definitions of manufacturing and processing under EPCRA section 313 apply to the mining sector processes of extraction and beneficiation. This action will not affect the coal extraction activities exemption.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 372 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 11001 et seq Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 12/00/2011

Final Action 06/00/2013

Additional Information: Facilities included in the following NAICS manufacturing codes (corresponding to SIC codes 20 through 39): 311*,312*, 313*, 314*, 315*, 316, 321, 322, 323*, 324, 325*, 326*, 327, 331, 332, 333, 334*, 335*, 336, 337*, 339*,111998*, 211112*, 212234*, 212235*, 212393*, 212399*, 488390*, 511110, 511120, 511130, 511140*, 511191,511199, 511220, 512230*, 516110*, 541710*, or 811490*. *Exceptions and/or limitations exist for these NAICS codes. Facilities included in the following NAICS codes (corresponding to SIC codes other than SIC codes 20 through 39): 212111, 212112, 212113 (correspond to SIC 12, Coal Mining (except 1241)); or 212221, 212222, 212231, 212234, 212299 (correspond to SIC 10, Metal Mining (except 1011, 1081, and 1094)); or 221111, 221112, 221113, 221119, 221121, 221122 (Limited to facilities that combust coal and/or oil for the purpose of generating power for distribution in commerce) (correspond to SIC 4911, 4931, and 4939, Electric Utilities); or 424690, 425110, 425120 (Limited to facilities previously classified in SIC 5169, Chemicals and Allied Products, Not Elsewhere Classified); or 424710 (corresponds to SIC 5171, Petroleum Bulk Terminals and Plants); or 562112 (Limited to facilities primarily engaged in solvent recovery services on a contract or fee basis (previously classified under SIC 7389, Business Services, NEC)); or 562211, 562212, 562213, 562219, 562920 (Limited to facilities regulated under theResource Conservation and Recovery Act, subtitle C, 42 U.S.C. 6921 et seq.) (correspond to SIC 4953, Refuse Systems); EPA
Docket information: EPA-HQ-OEI-2009-0453

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: www.epa.gov/tri/programs/mining/index.htm Agency Contact: Daniel Teitelbaum Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Environmental Information
2844T Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-0964
FAX: 202 566-0741
E-Mail: Teitelbaum.Daniel@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Gilbert Mears Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Environmental Information
2844T Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-0954
FAX: 202 566-0741
E-Mail: mears.gilbert@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Environmental Information ( OEI ) RIN: 2025-AA19

View Related Documents

Title: TRI; Response to Petition To Delete Acetonitrile From the Toxics Release Inventory List of Toxic Chemicals

Abstract: This action will respond to a petition received by EPA to delete acetonitrile from the list of toxic chemicals reportable under section 313 of the Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Act (EPCRA). EPA will respond to the petition by either granting or denying the petition. If EPA grants the petition a notice of proposed rulemaking will be published in the Federal Register, if EPA denies the petition a notice of petition denial will be published. The deletion of this chemical would eliminate all the reporting requirements under the Toxic Chemical Release Reporting Rule.

Priority: Info./Admin./Other Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 372 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 11023(e) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite
Notice of Data Availability 04/07/2008 73 FR 12410
Response 02/00/2012

Additional Information: Split from RIN 2025-AA00. Formerly listed as RIN 2070-AC00. Statutory deadline: Within 180 days of receipt the Agency must either initiate rulemaking or explain why not in the Federal Register. Manufacturing industries in SIC codes 20-39 plus the following industries and SIC codes: Metal Mining (SIC code 10 except SIC codes 1011, 1081, and 1094); Coal Mining (SIC code 12 except SIC code 1241); Electric Utilities (SIC codes 4911, 4931, 4939); Commercial Hazardous Waste Treatment (SIC code 4953); Chemicals and Allied Products-Wholesale (SIC code 5169); Petroleum Bulk Terminals and Plants (SIC code 5171); and Solvent Recovery Services (SIC code 7389).

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.epa.gov/tri

Sectors Affected: 23; 21; 4911; 22; 4931 Agency Contact: Daniel Bushman Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Environmental Information
2842T Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-0743
FAX: 202 566-0677E-Mail: bushman.daniel@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Nicole Paquette Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Environmental Information
2842T Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-0642
FAX: 202 566-0677
E-Mail: paquette.nicole@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Environmental Information ( OEI ) RIN: 2025-AA24

View Related Documents

Title: Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) Articles Exemption Clarification Rule

Abstract: Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) reporting is required by section 313 of the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA) and section 6607 of the Pollution Prevention Act. The purpose of this rule is to clarify the scope of the exemption from TRI reporting requirements for items that qualify as articles. [See 40 CFR 372.38(b)] EPA believes that language contained in the regulation and subsequent guidance should be clarified for the regulated community concerning what items qualify as articles and are therefore exempt from TRI threshold determinations and TRI release and other waste management calculations and reporting.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 372.38(b) (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 11023 et seq; 42 USC 13106 et seq Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 08/24/2009 74 FR 42625
Supplemental NPRM 05/00/2012

Final Action 04/00/2013

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM - http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=0900006480a10bb0; Facilities included in the following NAICS manufacturing codes (corresponding to SIC codes 20 through 39): 311*,312*, 313*, 314*, 315*, 316, 321, 322, 323*, 324, 325*, 326*, 327, 331, 332, 333, 334*, 335*, 336, 337*, 339*,111998*, 211112*, 212234*, 212235*, 212393*, 212399*, 488390*, 511110, 511120, 511130, 511140*, 511191,511199, 511220, 512230*, 516110*, 541710*, or 811490*. *Exceptions and/or limitations exist for these NAICS codes. Facilities included in the following NAICS codes (corresponding to SIC codes other than SIC codes 20 through 39): 212111, 212112, 212113 (correspond to SIC 12, Coal Mining (except 1241)); or 212221, 212222, 212231, 212234, 212299 (correspond to SIC 10, Metal Mining (except 1011, 1081, and 1094)); or 221111, 221112, 221113, 221119, 221121, 221122 (Limited to facilities that combust coal and/or oil for the purpose of generating power for distribution in commerce) (correspond to SIC 4911, 4931, and 4939, Electric Utilities); or 424690, 425110, 425120 (Limited to facilities previously classified in SIC 5169, Chemicals and Allied Products, Not Elsewhere Classified); or 424710 (corresponds to SIC 5171, Petroleum Bulk Terminals and Plants); or 562112 (Limited to facilities primarily engaged in solvent recovery services on a contract or fee basis (previously classified under SIC 7389, Business Services, NEC)); or 562211, 562212, 562213, 562219, 562920 (Limited to facilities regulated under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, subtitle C, 42 U.S.C. 6921 et seq.) (correspond to SIC 4953, Refuse Systems); EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-TRI-2009-0602

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 212111 Agency Contact: Daniel Teitelbaum Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Environmental Information
2844T Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-0964
FAX: 202 566-0741
E-Mail: Teitelbaum.Daniel@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Ingrid Rosencrantz Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Environmental Information
2844T Washington , DC 20460Phone: 202 566-0961
E-Mail: rosencrantz.ingrid@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Environmental Information ( OEI ) RIN: 2025-AA30

View Related Documents

Title: Electronic Reporting of Toxics Release Inventory Data Under the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA)

Abstract: Currently, facilities must report to the Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) program electronically via the Toxics Release Inventory-Made Easy Web application (TRI-MEweb) or by paper. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) proposes to require facilities to report non-confidential information via TRI-MEweb. Facilities reporting trade secrets would continue to file paper forms. The use of TRI-MEweb will help ensure data accuracy, while also enabling the Agency to more effectively provide the public with access to the latest TRI data on toxic chemical releases and other waste management within communities.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 372.85 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: EPCRA sec 313 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Action 00/00/0000

NPRM 01/00/2012

Additional Information: Facilities included in the following NAICS manufacturing codes (corresponding to SIC codes 20 through 39): 311*,312*, 313*, 314*, 315*, 316, 321, 322, 323*, 324, 325*, 326*, 327, 331, 332, 333, 334*, 335*, 336, 337*, 339*,111998*, 211112*, 212234*, 212235*, 212393*, 212399*, 488390*, 511110, 511120, 511130, 511140*, 511191,511199, 511220, 512230*, 516110*, 541710*, or 811490*. *Exceptions and/or limitations exist for these NAICS codes. Facilities included in the following NAICS codes (corresponding to SIC codes other than SIC codes 20 through 39): 212111, 212112, 212113 (correspond to SIC 12, Coal Mining (except 1241)); or 212221, 212222, 212231, 212234, 212299 (correspond to SIC 10, Metal Mining (except 1011, 1081, and 1094)); or 221111, 221112, 221113, 221119, 221121, 221122 (Limited to facilities that combust coal and/or oil for the purpose of generating power for distribution in commerce) (correspond to SIC 4911, 4931, and 4939, Electric Utilities); or 424690, 425110, 425120 (Limited to facilities previously classified in SIC 5169, Chemicals and Allied Products, Not Elsewhere Classified); or 424710 (corresponds to SIC 5171, Petroleum Bulk Terminals and Plants); or 562112 (Limited to facilities primarily engaged in solvent recovery services on a contract or fee basis (previously classified under SIC 7389, Business Services, NEC)); or 562211, 562212, 562213, 562219, 562920 (Limited to facilities regulated under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, subtitle C, 42 U.S.C. 6921 et seq.) (correspond to SIC 4953, Refuse Systems)

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 316 Agency Contact: David Turk Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Environmental Information
2844T Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-1527
E-Mail: Turk.David@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Environmental Information ( OEI ) RIN: 2025-AA31

View Related Documents

Title: Toxic Release Inventory (TRI) Reporting for Facilities Located on Indian Country

Abstract: This action corrects one error in 40 CFR section 372.30(a) of the Code of Federal Regulations, by reinstating the previously promulgated amendment from 1990 which named tribes as the implementing authority for title III within their jurisdiction. This portion of the amendment, part 372.30(a) from July 26, 1990, specifically addresses the "whom" to where facilities located in Indian Country are to report, i.e., facilities on Indian Country need to submit their information to the tribal official rather than the State. This amendment did not officially become codified in the Federal Register, due to a transcriptionoversight. In the Federal Register of July 26, 1990 (55 FR 144), for 40 CFR part 355.20 and 372.30, EPA has appointed the Indian Tribe as the implementing authority for title III on land on which it presides. This geographic area, defined as "Indian Country," is managed by the chief executive officer of the Tribe with the same responsibilities as a governor, as outlined by SARA section 301. Since the 1990 amendment, EPA has delegated such oversight authority to Tribes for Title III within their jurisdiction. Given this, 40 CFR part 372.30(a) needs to be revised to include guidance for facilities located in Indian Country; EPA's Form R and Form R Schedule 1 must therefore be submitted to the official designated by the Chief Executive Officer of the tribe, as well as to EPA.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 372.30(a) (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 11013, 42 USC 11028 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 09/30/2011 76 FR 60781

NPRM Comment Period End 11/29/2011

Final Action 02/00/2012

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No Agency Contact: Louise Camalier Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Environmental Information
2842T Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-0503
FAX: 202 566-0677
E-Mail: Camalier.Louise@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Elizabeth Jackson Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Environmental Information
2842T Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-0626
FAX: 202 566-0677
E-Mail: Jackson.Elizabeth@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Environmental Information ( OEI ) RIN: 2025-AA17

View Related Documents

Title: TRI; Response to Petition To Add Diisononyl Phthalate to the Toxics Release Inventory List of Toxic Chemicals

Abstract: This action will respond to a petition received by EPA to add diisononyl phthalate to the list of toxic chemicals reportable under section 313 of the Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Act (EPCRA). EPA will respond to the petition by either granting or denying the petition. If EPA grants the petition a notice of proposed rulemaking will be published in the Federal Register, if EPA denies the petition a notice of petition denial will be published. The addition of this chemical would make it subject to all the reporting requirements under the Toxic Chemical Release Reporting Rule.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 372 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 11023(e) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Action 00/00/0000
NPRM Original 09/05/2000 65 FR 53681
Notice of Data Availability 06/14/2005 70 FR 34437

Additional Information: EPA publication information: Notice of Data Availability - http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPAWASTE/2005/June/Day-14/f11664.htm; Split from RIN 2025-AA00. Formerly listed as RIN 2070-AC00. Statutory deadline:Within 180 days of receipt the Agency must either initiate rulemaking or explain why not in the Federal Register. Manufacturing industries in SIC codes 20-39 plus the following industries and SIC codes: Metal Mining (SIC code 10 except SIC codes 1011, 1081, and 1094); Coal Mining (SIC code 12 except SIC code 1241); Electric Utilities (SIC codes 4911, 4931, 4939); Commercial Hazardous Waste Treatment (SIC code 4953); Chemicals and Allied Products-Wholesale (SIC code 5169); Petroleum Bulk Terminals and Plants (SIC code 5171); and, Solvent Recovery Services (SIC code 7389). Facilities included in the following NAICS manufacturing codes (corresponding to SIC codes 20 through 39): 311*,312*, 313*, 314*, 315*, 316, 321, 322, 323*, 324, 325*, 326*, 327, 331, 332, 333, 334*, 335*, 336, 337*, 339*,111998*, 211112*, 212234*, 212235*, 212393*, 212399*, 488390*, 511110, 511120, 511130, 511140*, 511191,511199, 511220, 512230*, 516110*, 541710*, or 811490*. *Exceptions and/or limitations exist for these NAICS codes. Facilities included in the following NAICS codes (corresponding to SIC codes other than SIC codes 20 through 39): 212111, 212112, 212113 (correspond to SIC 12, Coal Mining (except 1241)); or 212221, 212222, 212231, 212234, 212299 (correspond to SIC 10, Metal Mining (except 1011, 1081, and 1094)); or 221111, 221112, 221113, 221119, 221121, 221122 (Limited to facilities that combust coal and/or oil for the purpose of generating power for distribution in commerce) (correspond to SIC 4911, 4931, and 4939, Electric Utilities); or 424690, 425110, 425120 (Limited to facilities previously classified in SIC 5169, Chemicals and Allied Products, Not Elsewhere Classified); or 424710 (corresponds to SIC 5171, Petroleum Bulk Terminals and Plants); or 562112 (Limited to facilities primarily engaged in solvent recovery services on a contract or fee basis (previously classified under SIC 7389, Business Services, NEC)); or 562211, 562212, 562213, 562219, 562920 (Limited to facilities regulated under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, subtitle C, 42 U.S.C. 6921 et seq.) (correspond to SIC 4953, Refuse Systems).

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; State

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.epa.gov/tri

Sectors Affected: 212111 Agency Contact: Daniel Bushman Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Environmental Information
2842T Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-0743
FAX: 202 566-0677
E-Mail: bushman.daniel@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Nicole Paquette Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Environmental Information
2842T Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-0642
FAX: 202 566-0677
E-Mail: paquette.nicole@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Environmental Information ( OEI ) RIN: 2025-AA16

View Related Documents

Title: TRI; Response to Petition To Delete Chromium, Antimony, Titanate From the Metal Compound Categories Listed on the Toxics Release Inventory

Abstract: This action was suspended on May 22, 2007 at the request of the petitioner. If resumed, this action will respond to a petition received by EPA to delete chromium, antimony, titanate from the list of toxic chemicals reportable under section 313 of the Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Act (EPCRA). EPA will respond to the petition by either granting or denying the petition. If EPA grants the petition a notice of proposed rulemaking will be published in the Federal Register, if EPA denies the petition a notice of petition denial will be published. Chromium, antimony, titanate is reportable under the chromium and antimony compound categories, the deletion of this chemical would eliminate all the reporting requirements under the Toxic Chemical Release Reporting Rule.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 372 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 11013 "EPCRA 313" Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Withdrawn 09/08/2011

Additional Information: Split from RIN 2025-AA00 & formerly listed as RIN 2070-AC00.Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.epa.gov/tri

Sectors Affected: 212299; 111998; 212399; 511199; 212113; 315; 312; 212112; 212111; 511130; 425110; 325; 334; 212234; 511140; 221121; 221122; 335; 332; 311; 221112; 337; 212221; 511191; 562112; 562211; 221111; 212231; 316; 333; 562920; 339; 512230; 211112; 511110; 327; 221113; 424690; 212393; 221119; 562219; 811490; 488390; 322; 511120; 424710; 324; 326; 331; 323; 212222; 562213; 562212; 313; 314; 336; 425120; 321 Agency Contact: Daniel Bushman Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Environmental Information
2842T Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-0743
FAX: 202 566-0677
E-Mail: bushman.daniel@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Nicole Paquette Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Environmental Information
2842T Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-0642
FAX: 202 566-0677
E-Mail: paquette.nicole@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Environmental Information ( OEI ) RIN: 2025-AA27

View Related Documents

Title: TRI: Intent to Consider Lifting Administrative Stay Regarding Hydrogen Sulfide Reporting Requirements

Abstract: In response to a petition from the Natural Resources Defense Council and the Governor of New York, hydrogen sulfide, along with 20 other chemicals and two chemical categories, was added to the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA) section 313 list of toxic chemicals as part of a 1993 final rule (December 1, 1993, 58 FR 63500). Hydrogen sulfide was listed under the criteria of EPCRA section 313(d)(2)(B) based on chronic neurotoxic effects in humans and under EPCRA section 313(d)(2)(C) based on acute aquatic toxicity. However, on August 22, 1994 (59 FR 43048), EPA issued an Administrative Stay of the EPCRA section 313 reporting requirements for hydrogen sulfide. Some members of the regulated community expressed concern that the specific basis for listing hydrogen sulfide under EPCRA section 313(d)(2)(B) changed between the proposed rule (September 8, 1992, 57 FR 41020) and the final rule (December 1, 1993, 58 FR 63500) and that they did not have an opportunity to comment on the final basis for the addition under EPCRA section 313(d)(2)(B). Although the statutory basis for the determination did not change, the Agency did cite chronic neurotoxic effects in the final rule and chronic respiratory effects in the proposed rule as the specific effects of concern. In addition, charges were made that EPA's decision not to include evidence of exposure in deciding to list hydrogen sulfide on the basis of chronic human health effects was inconsistent with past Agency practice. EPA did not agree that it had been inconsistent in its use of exposure analysis in EPCRA section 313 listings, but felt that the public deserved an opportunity to be presented with further clarification of the Agency's position on this issue. Therefore, the Agency decided to issue an administrative stay of the reporting requirements for hydrogen sulfide in order to allow for additional time to review these issues. EPA stated that a subsequent Federal Register notice would provide a mechanism for the public to comment on the specific basis for listing hydrogen sulfide as well as providing a more complete discussion of use of exposure analysis in EPCRA section 313 listing decisions. This action is the subsequent Federal Register notice. EPA will take comments on its latest hazard assessment for hydrogen sulfide and EPA's intent to consider lifting the administrative stay.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 372 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: EPCRA, sec 313 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Notice 02/26/2010 75 FR 8889

Final Action 10/17/2011 76 FR 64022

Additional Information: EPA publication information: Notice - http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=0900006480aaf30f; EPA Docket information: EPA–HQ–
TRI–2009–0844Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.epa.gov/tri Agency Contact: Daniel Bushman Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Environmental Information
2842T Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-0743
FAX: 202 566-0677
E-Mail: bushman.daniel@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Nicole Paquette Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Environmental Information
2842T Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-0642
FAX: 202 566-0677
E-Mail: paquette.nicole@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Environmental Information ( OEI ) RIN: 2025-AA32

View Related Documents

Title: Cross-Media Electronic Reporting Regulation Interpretive Rule

Abstract: EPA planed to issue an interpretive rule to clarify that the streamlined process under the new part 3 Cross-Media Electronic Reporting Regulation (CROMERR), 40 CFR section 3.1000(a), to allow states, tribes and local governments (authorized programs) to modify their EPA-authorized programs. This action is being withdrawn.

Priority: Info./Admin./Other Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 3 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 7 USC 136 to 136y; 15 USC 2601 to 2692; 33 USC 1251 to 1387; 33 USC 1401 to 1445; 33 USC 2701 to 2761; 42 USC 300f to 300j-26; 42 USC 4852d; 42 USC 6901 to 6992k; 42 USC 7401 to 7671q; 42 USC 9601 to 9675; 42 USC 11001 to 11050; 15 USC 7001; 44 USC 3504 to 3506 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Withdrawn 08/17/2011

Additional Information: Action is being withdrawn. OEI withdrawal memo is attached in FAR Summary under the Action Development tab; EPA Docket information: N/A

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.epa.gov/CROMERR

Sectors Affected: 92 Agency Contact: Evi Huffer Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Environmental Information
2823T Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-1697
FAX: 202 566-1684
E-Mail: Huffer.Evi@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Karen Seeh Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Environmental Information
2823T Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-1175
E-Mail: Seeh.Karen@epamail.epa.govEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA) Water ( WATER ) RIN: 2040-AF13

View Related Documents

Title: Stormwater Regulations Revision To Address Discharges From Developed Sites

Abstract: Stormwater discharge from developed areas is a major cause of degradation of surface waters. This is true for both conveyance of pollutants and the erosive power of increased stormwater flow rates and volumes. Current stormwater regulations were promulgated in 1990 and 1999. In 2006, the Office of Water asked the National Research Council (NRC) to review the stormwater program and recommend ways to strengthen it. The NRC Report, which was finalized in October 2008, found that the current stormwater program "...is not likely to adequately control stormwater's contribution to waterbody impairment" and recommended that EPA take action to address the harmful effects of stormwater flow. This proposed action would establish requirements for, at minimum, managing stormwater discharges from newly developed and re-developed sites, to reduce the amount of pollutants in stormwater discharges entering receiving waters by reducing the discharge of excess stormwater. EPA may take other actions to implement improved control of stormwater pollution and more efficient rainwater use. The Phase I and Phase II MS4 regulations might also be combined and amended, and may include provisions for better managing existing discharges.

Priority: Economically Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: Yes Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 33 USC 1251 et seq Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

NPRM Judicial Chesapeake Bay Settlement Agreement, May 10, 2010, Fowler v. U.S. EPA, No. 1 :09-CV -00005-CKK (D. D.C) modified by agreement
10/04/2011. 12/15/2011

Other Judicial Chesapeake Bay Settlement Agreement, May 10, 2010, Fowler v. U.S. EPA, No. 1 :09-CV -00005-CKK (D. D.C) 11/19/2012

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: Section 402(p) of the Clean Water Act requires EPA to regulate certain stormwater discharges. Stormwater is a primary contributor of water quality impairment. There is a need to strengthen the stormwater program’s effectiveness by reducing pollutant loading from currently regulated and unregulated stormwater discharges and preserving surface water health and integrity. This action was informed by the 2006 National Research Council report.

Legal Basis: Section 402(p) of the Clean Water Act requires EPA to regulate certain discharges from stormwater in order to protect water quality.

Alternatives: To be determined.

Costs and Benefits: To be determined.

Risks: To be determined.

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 01/00/2012

Final Action 11/00/2012

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0817

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Business;
Governmental Jurisdictions Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State

Federalism: Undetermined Energy Affected: Undetermined

RIN Information
URL: www.epa.gov/npdes/stormwater/rulemaking Agency Contact: Connie Bosma Environmental Protection Agency

Water
4203M Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-6773
FAX: 202 564-6431
E-Mail: bosma.connie@epa.gov Agency Contact: Janet Goodwin Environmental Protection Agency

Water4303T Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-1060
E-Mail: Goodwin.Janet@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Water ( WATER ) RIN: 2040-AF14

View Related Documents

Title: Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Source Category

Abstract: EPA establishes national technology-based regulations, called effluent guidelines, to reduce discharges of pollutants from industries to waters of the U.S. . These requirements are incorporated into National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) discharge permits issued by EPA and States, and through the national pretreatment program. The steam electric effluent guidelines apply to steam electric power plants using nuclear or fossil fuels, such as coal, oil, and natural gas. There are about 1,200 nuclear- and fossil-fueled steam electric power plants nationwide; approximately 500 of these power plants are coal fired. In a study completed in 2009, EPA found that the current regulations, which were last updated in 1982, do not adequately address the pollutants being discharged and have not kept pace with changes that have occurred in the electric power industry over the last 3 decades. The rulemaking will address discharges from ash ponds and flue gas desulfurization (FGD) air pollution controls, as well as other power plant waste streams. Power plant discharges can have major impacts on water quality, including reduced organism abundance and species diversity, contamination of drinking water sources, and other effects. Pollutants of concern include metals (e.g., mercury, arsenic and selenium), nutrients, and total dissolved solids.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: Undetermined Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 423 revision (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 33 USC 1311; 33 USC 1314; 33 USC 1316; 33 USC 1317; 33 USC 1318; 33 USC 1342; 33 USC 1361 Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

NPRM Judicial Consent Decree 07/23/2012

Other Judicial Consent Decree 01/31/2014

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: EPA's decision to proceed with a rulemaking was announced on September 15, 2009. EPA reviewed wastewater discharges from power plants and the treatment technologies available to reduce pollutant discharges, which demonstrated the need to update the current effluent guidelines (40 CFR 423). The current regulations, which were last updated in 1982, do not adequately address the pollutants being discharged and have not kept pace with changes that have occurred in the electric power industry over the last 3 decades. Steam electric power plants are responsible for a significant amount of the toxic pollutant loadings discharged to surface waters by point sources, and coal ash ponds and flue gas desulfurization (FGD) systems are the source of much of these pollutants.

Legal Basis: Section 301(b)(2) of the Clean Water Act requires EPA to promulgate effluent limitations for categories of point sources, using technology-based standards, that govern the sources' discharge of certain pollutants. 33 U.S.C. section 1311(b). Section 304(b) of the Act directs EPA to develop effluent limitations guidelines (ELGs) that identify certain technologies and control measures available to achieve effluent reductions for each point source category, specifying factors to be taken into account in identifying those technologies and control measures. 33 U.S.C. section 1314(b). Since the 1970s, EPA has formulated effluent limitations and ELGs in tandem through a single administrative process. Am. Frozen Food Inst. v. Train, 539 F.2d 107 (D.C. Cir. 1976). The CWA also requires EPA to perform an annual review of existing ELGs and to revise them, if appropriate. 33 U.S.C. section 1314(b); see also 33 U.S.C. section 1314(m)(1)(A). EPA originally established effluent limitations and guidelines for the steam electric generating industry in 1974 and last updated them in 1982. 47 FR 52290 (Nov. 19, 1982). As described above, EPA determined the existing regulations do not adequately address the pollutants being discharged and that revisions are appropriate.

Alternatives: To be determined.

Costs and Benefits: To be determined.

Risks: To be determined.

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 08/00/2012

Final Action 03/00/2014

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Small Entities Affected: Business; Governmental Jurisdictions Federalism: Undetermined Energy Affected: Undetermined

RIN Information
URL: http://water.epa.gov/scitech/wastetech/guide/steam_index.cfm

Sectors Affected: 221112; 221113 Agency Contact: Ronald Jordan Environmental Protection Agency
Water
4303T Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-1003
FAX: 202 566-1053
E-Mail: Jordan.Ronald@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Jezebele Alicea Environmental Protection Agency
Water
4303T Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-1755
FAX: 202 566-1053
E-Mail: alicea.jezebele@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Water ( WATER ) RIN: 2040-AF15

View Related Documents

Title: National Primary Drinking Water Regulations for Lead and Copper: Regulatory Revisions

Abstract: Beginning in 2004, EPA conducted a wide-ranging review of implementation of the Lead and Copper Rule (LCR) to determine if there is a national problem related to elevated lead levels. EPA’s comprehensive review consisted of several elements, including a series of workshops designed to solicit issues, comments, and suggestions from stakeholders on particular issues; a review of monitoring data to evaluate the effectiveness of the LCR; and a review of the LCR implementation by States and water utilities. As a result of this multi-part review, EPA identified seven targeted rules changes and EPA promulgated a set of short-term regulatory revisions and clarifications on October 10, 2007, to strengthen implementation of the existing Lead and Copper Rule. In developing the short-term revisions, EPA identified several regulatory changes to be considered as part of identifying more comprehensive changes to the rule. These considerations are longer-term in nature as they require additional data collection, research, analysis, and stakeholder involvement to support decisions. This action addresses the remaining regulatory revisions to be completed in the 2013/2014 time frame. Changes will be made to make the rule more cost effective and more protective of public health.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 141 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 300f et seq Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 10/00/2012

Final Action 12/00/2013

Additional Information: Includes Retrospective Review under E.O. 13563.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: Undetermined Energy Affected: No Agency Contact: Jeffrey Kempic Environmental Protection Agency
Water
4607M Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-4880
FAX: 202 564-3760
E-Mail: Kempic.Jeffrey@epamail.epa.govEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA) Water ( WATER ) RIN: 2040-AF16

View Related Documents

Title: Water Quality Standards Regulatory Clarifications

Abstract: EPA is proposing a targeted set of changes to the water quality standards (WQS) regulation to improve its effectiveness in helping restore and maintain the Nation's Waters. The core of the current WQS regulation has been in place since 1983. Since then, a number of issues have been raised by stakeholders or identified by EPA in the implementation process that will benefit from clarification and greater specificity. The proposed rule will provide clarity in the following six key areas: 1) Administrator's determination, 2) designated uses, 3) triennial review requirements, 4) antidegradation, 5) variances to water quality standards, and 6) compliance schedule authorizing provisions. These clarifications will allow EPA to better achieve program goals by providing enhanced water resource protection and clearer and simplified requirements.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 131 (revision) (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 33 USC 1251 et seq Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite
Notice of Listening Session 07/30/2010 75 FR 44930

NPRM 03/00/2012

Final Action 11/00/2012

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OW-2010-0606

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: State; Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://epa.gov/waterscience/standards Agency Contact: Grace Robiou Environmental Protection Agency

Water
4305T Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-2975
E-Mail: Robiou.Grace@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Christina Christensen Environmental Protection Agency

Water
4305T Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-0537
E-Mail: Christensen.Christina@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Water ( WATER ) RIN: 2040-AF17

View Related Documents

Title: National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit Regulations for the Appropriate Use of Offsets With Regard to Water Quality Permitting

Abstract: In this rulemaking, EPA plans to define and set conditions regarding the appropriate use of offsets to meet waterquality based effluent limitations and protect water quality standards.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 122.4(i) (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 33 USC 1361; 33 USC 1311(b)(1)(C) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 09/00/2012Final Action 10/00/2013

Additional Information: SAN No. 5240

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: Undetermined Energy Affected: No Agency Contact: Amelia Letnes Environmental Protection Agency
Water
4203M Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-5627
E-Mail: Letnes.Amelia@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Michelle Schutz Environmental Protection Agency

Water
4203M Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-7374
E-Mail: Schutz.Michelle@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Water ( WATER ) RIN: 2040-AF20

View Related Documents

Title: Revised Regulations for Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations (CAFOs) in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed

Abstract: EPA and authorized states administer the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program for concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs), as revised by nationally applicable rules in 2003 and 2008. On May 12, 2009, President Barack Obama issued Executive Order 13508 on Chesapeake Bay Protection and Restoration. Agriculture is the single largest contributor of nitrogen, phosphorus, and sediment pollution to the Chesapeake Bay Watershed. Manure is the source of about half of the nutrient loading from agriculture. Consistent with the joint federal strategy, the scope of the proposed rule will consider expanding the universe of CAFOs and requiring more stringent standards for permits (e.g., better nutrient management planning). Additionally, options for a streamlined designation process of smaller facilities as CAFOs and better offsite manure management may be considered for the Bay or nationally. During the rulemaking process, EPA will consider how effectively Chesapeake Bay states manage their pollution control programs to achieve the reductions in nutrient and sediment pollution needed to meet Bay water quality standards. The Chesapeake Bay CAFO Rule is being developed to ensure Regional and State Water NPDES Permitting Authorities have sufficient tools to reduce discharges of manure from these facilities.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: Not Yet Determined Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

NPRM Judicial 06/30/2012

Other Judicial 06/30/2014

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 05/00/2012

Final Action 06/00/2014

Additional Information: SAN No. 5443

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Federal; State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No Agency Contact: George Utting Environmental Protection Agency

Water
4203M Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-0744
E-Mail: Utting.George@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Shanika Whitehurst Environmental Protection AgencyWater

Phone: 202 564-8235
E-Mail: whitehurst.shanika@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Water ( WATER ) RIN: 2040-AF21

View Related Documents

Title: Water Quality Standards for the State of Florida's Estuaries and Coastal Waters

Abstract: EPA is under a Consent Decree deadline to promulgate numeric nutrient water quality criteria (which are elements of water quality standards) for the State of Florida's estuaries and coastal waters, flowing waters in south Florida (including canals), and the downstream protection values for flowing waters into estuaries by November 15, 2012. The Consent Decree states that EPA will sign for publication in the federal register proposed criteria for these three categories by March 15, 2012 and will sign for publication in the federal register a final rule by November 15, 2012. EPA made a determination on January 14, 2009 that numeric nutrient water quality criteria are necessary for the state to meet the requirements of the Clean Water Act (CWA).

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 131 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 33 USC 1251 et seq Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

NPRM Judicial 11/14/2011

Other Judicial 08/15/2012

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 03/00/2012

Final Action 11/00/2012

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OW-2010-0222

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No Agency Contact: Erica Fleisig Environmental Protection Agency
Water
4305T Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-1057
E-Mail: Fleisig.Erica@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Corey Buffo Environmental Protection Agency

Water
4305T Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-1279
E-Mail: Buffo.Corey@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Water ( WATER ) RIN: 2040-AF22

View Related Documents

Title: National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Concentrated Animal Feeding Operation (CAFO) Reporting

Rule

Abstract: EPA proposed a regulation that would collect information about concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs). CAFOs are a significant source of nutrient pollution and pathogens in U.S. watersheds. The information that would be collected under the proposed rule would allow EPA to increase water quality protection through better implementation of the NPDES permitting program for CAFOs. The proposed regulation would apply to all permitted and unpermitted CAFOs. EPA co-proposed a regulation that would only collect information from CAFOs in targeted areas, if EPA determined such collection was necessarybased on specified factors, such as water quality concerns.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 122 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 33 USC 1251(a); 33 USC 1311(a); 33 USC 1342; 33 USC 1362(14); 33 USC 1318(a); 33 USC 1319 Legal Deadline: None

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: The proposed rule would collect facility-specific information about CAFOs to help inform watershed management activities. This will enhance EPA's ability to effectively implement the NPDES program.

Legal Basis: The proposed rule would collect facility-specific information about CAFOs to help inform watershed management activities. This will enhance EPA's ability to effectively implement the NPDES program and reduce pathogens from CAFOs.

Alternatives: EPA proposed a number of alternatives including relying on existing information to collect information from
CAFOs.

Costs and Benefits: Not yet determined.

Risks: Not yet determined.

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 10/21/2011 76 FR 65431

NPRM Comment Period End 01/19/2012

Final Action 07/00/2012

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No Agency Contact: Becky Mitschele Environmental Protection Agency
Water
4203M Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-6418
E-Mail: Mitschele.Becky@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: George Utting Environmental Protection Agency

Water
4203M Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-0744
E-Mail: Utting.George@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Water ( WATER ) RIN: 2040-AF25

View Related Documents

Title: National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Application and Program Updates Rule

Abstract: EPA plans to propose regulations that would update specific elements of the existing National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) in order to better harmonize regulations and application forms, improve permit documentation and transparency and provide clarifications to the existing regulations. In this effort, EPA plans to address application, permitting, monitoring, and reporting requirements that have become obsolete or outdated due to programmatic, technical, or other changes that have occurred over the past 35 years. Specifically, EPA plans to focus on revising the NPDES permit application forms to specifically include all final Agency data standards, improving the consistency between the application forms, and updating the applications to better reflect current program practices, and specifically to incorporate new program areas into the forms (e.g., Clean Water Act section 316(b) requirements for cooling water intake structures). EPA also plans to address other program elements, including permit documentation, EPA State permit objection, and public participation procedures to improve the quality and transparency of permit development. As an example of a regulation which could be proposed to change to reduce burden, as well as improve transparency and public access to information, EPA is considering whether to revise the public notice requirements to allow a State to post notices of draft NPDES permits and other permit actions under the Clean Water Act on their State agency Web sites in lieu of traditional newspaper posting.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: NoCFR Citation: Not Yet Determined (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 33 USC 1251 et seq Legal Deadline: None

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: Certain application, permitting, monitoring, and reporting requirements need to be updated to reflect programmatic and technical changes that have occurred over the past 35 years.

Legal Basis: 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.

Alternatives: Not yet determined.

Costs and Benefits: Not yet determined.

Risks: Not yet determined.

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 03/00/2012

Final Action 10/00/2012

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State; Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No Agency Contact: Kathryn Kelley Environmental Protection Agency
Water
4203M Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-7004
FAX: 202 564-9544
E-Mail: Kelley.Kathryn@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: David Hair Environmental Protection Agency
Water
4203M Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-2287
FAX: 202 564-9544
E-Mail: Hair.David@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Water ( WATER ) RIN: 2040-AF26

View Related Documents

Title: Effluent Guidelines and Standards for the Dental Point Source Category

Abstract: EPA is developing pretreatment standards for pollutant discharges from dental offices. When dentists place or remove amalgam fillings, mercury and other contaminants are flushed into the sewer. Dental amalgam contains mercury and other metals that have the potential to pass through or interfere with municipal wastewater treatment at Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTWs). EPA’s technology assessment will focus on best management practices, such as use of amalgam separators, as a regulatory requirement.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 441 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 33 USC 1314; 33 USC 1317(b)(1) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 03/00/2012

Final Action 01/00/2013

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; State; Local

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No Energy Affected: NoRIN Information
URL: http://water.epa.gov/scitech/wastetech/guide/dental/

Sectors Affected: 621210; 339116 Agency Contact: Damon Highsmith Environmental Protection Agency
Water
4303T Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-2504
E-Mail: Highsmith.Damon@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Jan Matuszko Environmental Protection Agency
Water
4303T Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-1035
FAX: 202 566-1053
E-Mail: matuszko.jan@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Water ( WATER ) RIN: 2040-AF27

View Related Documents

Title: Effluent Guidelines and Standards for the Construction and Development Industry--Revision

Abstract: This action will address an error that was identified in the Effluent Limitations Guidelines for the Construction & Development (C&D) Point Source Category. The C&D rule was issued on December 1, 2009 and became effective on February 1, 2010. This rule contains a numeric effluent limit for turbidity, based on the application of passive treatment technology. This is the first time that a numeric limit has been imposed on a national basis. Subsequent to promulgation, EPA received two petitions for reconsideration of the C&D rule. The petitions pointed out a potential error in the calculation of the numeric limit. Based on EPA’s examination of the underlying dataset, the calculations in the existing administrative record are not adequate to support the numeric effluent limit. Consequently, EPA intends to propose a correction rule for public comment and then take
final action on a revised limitation.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 450 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 33 USC 1251, 1311, 1314, 1316, 1318, 1341, 1342, 1361 and 1370 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 12/00/2012

Final Action 01/00/2014

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OW-2010-0884

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://water.epa.gov/scitech/wastetech/guide/construction/index.cfm

Sectors Affected: 236; 237 Agency Contact: Jesse Pritts Environmental Protection Agency
Water
4303T Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-1038
E-Mail: Pritts.Jesse@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Janet Goodwin Environmental Protection Agency

Water
4303T Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-1060
E-Mail: Goodwin.Janet@epamail.epa.govEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA) Water ( WATER ) RIN: 2040-AF33

View Related Documents

Title: Withdrawal of Federal Water Quality Criteria for Certain States Covered Under EPA’s 1992 National Toxics Rule (NTR)

Abstract: The 1992 National Toxics Rule (NTR) promulgated for 14 States, the chemical-specific, numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants necessary to bring all States into compliance with the requirements of section 303(c)(2)(B) of the Clean Water Act (CWA). States determined by EPA to fully comply with section 303(c)(2)(B) requirements were not affected by this rule. As States adopt and EPA approves criteria for priority toxic pollutants, states may be removed from the NTR via a Federal Rule Withdrawal. EPA is proposing to withdraw aquatic life cyanide (CN) criteria for San Francisco Bay and numerous numeric toxic criteria for New Jersey and Puerto Rico from the NTR.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 131.36 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 33 USC 1313(c); 5 USC 551 et seq Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 02/00/2012

Final Action 07/00/2012

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No Agency Contact: Bryan Goodwin Environmental Protection Agency

Water
4305T Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-0793
E-Mail: Goodwin.Bryan@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Water ( WATER ) RIN: 2040-AC84

View Related Documents

Title: National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES): Use of Sufficiently Sensitive Test Methods for Permit Applications and Reporting

Abstract: EPA is launching an effort to update specific elements of the existing NPDES regulations in order to provide clarifications related to the NPDES permit application and NPDES permit monitoring analytical detection level requirements.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 122; 40 CFR 136 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 33 USC 1311 CWA 301; 33 USC 1312 CWA 302; 33 USC 1314 CWA 304; 33 USC 1316 CWA 306; 33 USC 1318 CWA 308; 33 USC 1342 CWA 402; 33 USC 1361 CWA 501 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 06/23/2010 75 FR 35712

Final Action 12/00/2011

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM - http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2010/pdf/2010-15254.pdf

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; Tribal

Small Entities Affected: Business; Governmental Jurisdictions Federalism: No Energy Affected: No Agency Contact: Kathryn Kelley Environmental Protection AgencyWater
4203M Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-7004
FAX: 202 564-9544
E-Mail: Kelley.Kathryn@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: David Hair Environmental Protection Agency
Water
4203M Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-2287
FAX: 202 564-9544
E-Mail: Hair.David@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Water ( WATER ) RIN: 2040-AD94

View Related Documents

Title: National Primary Drinking Water Regulations: Revisions to the Total Coliform Rule

Abstract: EPA is revising the Total Coliform Rule (TCR), which was published in 1989. The original TCR, promulgated in 1989, protects human health by requiring microbial monitoring in drinking water distribution systems. Since then, EPA has gained a better understanding of total coliforms as an indicator of contamination in the distribution system. EPA committed to begin the process of revising the TCR as part of the Six-Year review requirements of the Safe Drinking Water Act. EPA convened a Federal Advisory Committee to recommend revisions to the TCR. The Advisory Committee included members representing public interest groups, states, local elected officials, Indian tribes, drinking water utilities and EPA. In September 2008, members of the Federal Advisory Committee signed an agreement in principle (AIP), which recommended revisions to the TCR, as well as research and information collection needed to better understand potential public health impacts from conditions in the distribution system and control of microbial drinking water contamination. In accordance with commitments EPA agreed to in the AIP, EPA has proposed a rule that has the same elements and effects as the recommendations in the AIP. The proposed rule requires water systems to find and fix pathways to contamination when monitoring results indicate that microbial contamination is present, develops specific criteria for public water systems to qualify for and stay on reduced monitoring, and aims to improve consumer understanding and confidence by making required public notices about the drinking water quality more meaningful.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 141 and 142 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 300f et seq Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite
Notice of Agreement in Principle 01/13/2009 74 FR 1683

NPRM 07/14/2010 75 FR 40926
Notice - Public Meeting 08/16/2010 75 FR 49930

NPRM Extension of Comment Period 08/31/2010 75 FR 53267

Final Action 06/00/2012

Additional Information: EPA publication information: Notice of Agreement in Principle - http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPAWATER/2009/January/Day-13/w469.htm; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OW-2008-0878

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; State; Tribal

Small Entities Affected: Business; Governmental Jurisdictions Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: www.epa.gov/safewater/disinfection/tcr/regulation_revisions.html

Sectors Affected: 2213 Agency Contact: Sean Conley Environmental Protection Agency

Water
4607M Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-1781
FAX: 202 564-3767
E-Mail: Conley.Sean@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Thomas Grubbs Environmental Protection AgencyWater
4607M Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-5262
FAX: 202 564-3767
E-Mail: Grubbs.Thomas@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Water ( WATER ) RIN: 2040-AE69

View Related Documents

Title: Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for Airport Deicing Operations

Abstract: In EPA’s 2004 Effluent Guidelines plan, the agency announced that it would begin development of a regulation to control the pollutants discharged from airport deicing operations. Based on preliminary study and on public comments, discharges from deicing operations have the potential to cause fish kills, algae blooms, and contamination to surface or ground waters. Sources of these pollutants include airfield deicers and aircraft deicing fluid that is not properly recaptured, re-used, or treated before discharge. Aircraft deicing agents typically contain glycols and additives. There is great disparity among airports in terms of wastewater treatment and also in terms of discharge permits.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 449 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: CWA 301; CWA 304; CWA 306; CWA 307; CWA 308; CWA 402; CWA 501 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 08/28/2009 74 FR 44675

Final Action 01/00/2012

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM -http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=0900006480a16b99; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQOW-2004-0038

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State

Small Entities Affected: Governmental Jurisdictions Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://water.epa.gov/scitech/wastetech/guide/airport/index.cfmt

Sectors Affected: 488119 Agency Contact: Eric Strassler Environmental Protection Agency

Water
4303T Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-1026
FAX: 202 566-1053
E-Mail: Strassler.Eric@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Brian D'Amico Environmental Protection Agency
Water
4303T Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-1069
FAX: 202 566-1053
E-Mail: damico.brian@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Water ( WATER ) RIN: 2040-AE95

View Related Documents

Title: Criteria and Standards for Cooling Water Intake Structures

Abstract: Section 316(b) of the Clean Water Act (CWA) requires EPA to ensure that the location, design, construction, andcapacity of cooling water intake structures reflect the best technology available (BTA) for minimizing adverse environmental impacts. Phase II, for existing electric generating plants that use at least 50 MGD of cooling water, was completed in July 2004. Industry and environmental stakeholders challenged the Phase II regulations. On review, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit remanded several key provisions. In July 2007, EPA suspended the Phase II rule following the decision in the Second Circuit. Several parties petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to review that decision, and the Supreme Court granted the petitions, limited to the issue of whether the Clean Water Act authorized EPA to consider the relationship of costs and benefits in establishing section 316(b) standards. On April 1, 2009, the Supreme Court reversed the Second Circuit, finding that the Agency may consider cost-benefit analysis in its decisionmaking, but not holding that the Agency must consider costs and benefits in these decisions. In June 2006, EPA promulgated the Phase III regulation, covering existing electric generating plants using less than 50 MGD of cooling water, new offshore oil and gas facilities, and all existing manufacturing facilities. Petitions to review this rule were filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. In July 2010, the U. S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit issued a decision upholding EPA's rule for new offshore oil and gas extraction facilities. Further, the court granted the request of EPA and environmental petitioners in the case to remand the existing facility portion of the rule back to the Agency for further rulemaking. EPA expects this new rulemaking would apply to the approximately 1,200 existing electric generating and manufacturing plants. The Fifth Circuit also affirmed that EPA may consider costs in relation to benefits but is not required to do so. EPA entered into a settlement with the plaintiffs in two lawsuits related to section 316(b) rulemakings. Under the settlement agreement, as modified, EPA agreed to sign a notice of a proposed rulemaking implementing section 316(b) of the CWA at existing facilities no later than March 28, 2011, and to sign a notice taking final action on the proposed rule no later than July 27, 2012. Plaintiffs agreed to seek dismissal of both their suits, subject to a request to reopen the Cronin proceeding in the event EPA failed to meet the agreed deadlines. EPA's proposed regulation includes uniform controls at all existing facilities to prevent fish from being trapped against screens (impingement), site-specific controls for existing facilities other than new units to prevent fish from being drawn through cooling systems (entrainment), and uniform controls equivalent to closed cycle cooling for new units at existing facilities (also entrainment). Other regulatory options analyzed included similar uniform impingement controls and progressively more stringent requirements for entrainment controls. Another option considered would impose the uniform impingement controls only for facilities withdrawing 50 million or more gallons per day of cooling water, with site-specific impingement controls for facilities withdrawing less than 50 million gallons per day.

Priority: Economically Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: Yes Unfunded Mandates: Private Sector

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 122; 40 CFR 125 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: CWA 101; CWA 301; CWA 304; CWA 308; CWA 316; CWA 401; CWA 402; CWA 501; CWA 510 Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

NPRM Judicial 03/28/2011

Other Judicial 07/27/2012

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: In the absence of national regulations, NPDES permit writers have developed requirements to implement section 316(b) on a case-by-case basis. This may result in a range of different requirements, and in some cases, delays in permit issuance or reissuance. This regulation may have substantial ecological benefits.

Legal Basis: The Clean Water Act requires EPA to establish best technology available standards to minimize adverse environmental impacts from cooling water intake structures. On February 16, 2004, EPA took final action on regulations governing cooling water intake structures at certain existing power producing facilities under section 316(b) of the Clean Water Act (Phase II rule). 69 FR 41576 (Jul. 9, 2004). These regulations were challenged, and the Second Circuit remanded several provisions of the Phase II rule on various grounds. Riverkeeper, Inc., v. EPA, 475F.3d83, (2d Cir., 2007). EPA suspended most of the rule in response to the remand. 72 FR 37107 (Jul. 9, 2007). The remand of Phase III does not change permitting requirements for these facilities. Until the new rule is issued, permit directors continue to issue permits on a case-by-case, Best Professional Judgment basis for Phase II facilities.

Alternatives: This analysis will cover various sizes and types of potentially regulated facilities and control technologies. EPA is considering whether to regulate on a national basis, by subcategory, by broad water body category, or some other basis.

Costs and Benefits: The technologies under consideration in this rulemaking are similar to the technologies considered for the original Phase II and Phase III rules, and costs have been updated to 2009. The annual social costs associated with EPA's proposed regulation are $384 million, plus an additional $15 million in costs associated with the new units provision. The annual social costs of the other options ranged from $327 million to $4.63 billion. EPA monetized only a portion of the expected annual benefits of the rule, amounting to $18 million. The monetized benefits for the other options ranged from $17 to $126 million. EPA is also conducting a stated preference survey to provide a more comprehensive estimate of the monetized benefits and expects to publish a notice of data availability with these results around the end of 2011.

Risks: Cooling water intake structures may pose significant risks for aquatic ecosystems.

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 04/20/2011 76 FR 22174

NPRM Comment Period End 07/19/2011
Reopening Public Comment Period 07/20/2011 76 FR 43230Reopening Comment Period End 08/18/2011

Final Action 07/00/2012

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM - http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail; EPA Docket
information: EPA-HQ-OW-2008-0667

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://water.epa.gov/lawsregs/lawsguidance/cwa/316b/index.cfm

Sectors Affected: 336412; 332999; 321999; 324199; 326299; 331521; 331524; 331315; 311313; 31321; 311312; 32731; 61131; 33312; 333922; 331525; 339914; 211111; 321912; 332211; 31214; 221121; 221122; 331112; 31332; 333111; 311225; 221112; 332212; 33251; 221111; 21221; 331111; 22121; 211112; 221113; 332323; 221119; 332618; 332439; 332919; 321918; 312229; 333923; 32212; 32213; 32411; 325992; 333315; 212391; 332117; 331312; 331419; 3221; 333911; 33651; 321219; 54171; 326192; 331221; 322291; 321113; 331492; 337215; 321212; 311222; 22133; 331222; 111991; 11193; 311311; 326211; 31221;

311221 Agency Contact: Paul Shriner Environmental Protection Agency

Water
4303T Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-1076
E-Mail: Shriner.Paul@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Julie Hewitt Environmental Protection Agency
Water
4303T Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-1031
E-Mail: hewitt.julie@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Water ( WATER ) RIN: 2040-AF09

View Related Documents

Title: Guidelines Establishing Test Procedures for the Analysis of Pollutants Under the Clean Water Act; Analysis and Sampling

Procedures

Abstract: This regulatory action would amend "Guidelines Establishing Test Procedures for the Analysis of Pollutants" at 40 CFR part 136 to approve test procedures (analytical methods) for use by testing laboratories for water monitoring. These test procedures are used to implement the NPDES program unless an alternate procedure is approved by a Regional Administrator. The regulation would also revise, clarify, and correct errors and ambiguities in existing methods and the water monitoring regulations.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 136; 40 CFR 423; 40 CFR 430; 40 CFR 435 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 33 USC 1251; 33 USC 1314(h); 33 USC 1361(a) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 09/23/2010 75 FR 58023

Final Action 02/00/2012

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM - http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=EPA-HQ-OW2010-0192-0074; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OW-2010-0192

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State;

Tribal

Small Entities Affected: Business; Governmental Jurisdictions Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://water.epa.gov/scitech/swguidance/methods/update_index.cfmAgency Contact: Maria Gomez-Taylor Environmental Protection Agency

Water
4303T Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-1005
FAX: 202 566-1053
E-Mail: gomez-taylor.maria@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Lemuel Walker Environmental Protection Agency
Water
4303T Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-1077
FAX: 202 566-1053
E-Mail: Walker.Lemuel@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Water ( WATER ) RIN: 2040-AF10

View Related Documents

Title: Revisions to the Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Regulation (UCMR 3) for Public Water Systems

Abstract: The Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA), as amended in 1996, requires the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to establish criteria for a program to monitor not more than 30 unregulated contaminants every five years. EPA published the first group of contaminants in the Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Regulation (i.e., UCMR 1), which established a revised approach for UCMR implementation, in the Federal Register dated September 17, 1999 (64 FR 50556), and the second list of unregulated contaminants (UCMR 2) in the Federal Register dated January 4, 2007 (72 FR 367). The final regulation would meet the SDWA requirement for identifying new priority contaminants to be monitored during the third UCMR cycle (i.e., UCMR 3) of 2012-2015.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 141 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 300f et seq Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

Other Statutory SDWA requires EPA to publish a UCMR every 5 years 01/04/2012

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 03/03/2011 76 FR 11713

NPRM Comment Period End 05/02/2011

Final Action 03/00/2012

Additional Information: SAN No. 5360

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Local

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No Agency Contact: Brenda Parris Environmental Protection Agency
Water
USEPA Cincinnati , OH 45268
Phone: 513 569-7961
FAX: 513 569-7191
E-Mail: Parris.Brenda@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Water ( WATER ) RIN: 2040-AD39

View Related Documents

Title: Uniform National Discharge Standards for Vessels of the Armed Forces--Phase II

Abstract: This action is Phase II of implementing regulations on Uniform National Discharge Standards for Vessels of theArmed Forces. In 1996 the Clean Water Act was amended to create section 312(n), Uniform National Discharge Standards for Vessels of the Armed Forces. Section 312(n) directs EPA and DOD to work together to provide Armed Forces vessels with a nationally uniform set of discharge standards, which preempt State discharge standards for these vessels. The purpose of the statute is to allow DOD to plan, design and build environmentally sound vessels, to encourage innovative pollution control technology, and to improve operational flexibility. EPA and DOD jointly promulgated Phase I of these regulations, 40 CFR part 1700, on May 10, 1999 (64 FR 25126). The Phase I rulemaking concluded that 25 discharges from Armed Forces vessels would require control devices. Some of these discharges (such as bilge water) have the potential to introduce oil or other organics into receiving waters; some (such as hull coating leachate) have the potential to introduce copper or other metals; and some (such as ballast water) have the potential to introduce nonindigenous invasive aquatic species. Phase II will establish performance standards for control devices for these 25 discharges. The Phase II performance standards will be promulgated in five "batches." Each batch will address several performance standards. Once DOD implements rules for achieving the standards set in Phase II, covered discharges from Armed Forces vessels will be required to meet these standards, and will not be subject to discharge standards established by States.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 1700 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 33 USC 1322; 33 USC 1361 Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

Other Statutory CWA 312(n)(5)(B)(i) 05/10/2001

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 04/00/2013

Final Action 04/00/2014

Additional Information: SAN No. 4357

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State;

Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: Yes Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/waterscience/rules/UNDS, http://www.epa.gov/owow/oceans/regulatory/unds/batchruleprocess.html, Agency Contact: Jonathan Amson Environmental Protection Agency
Water
4504T Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-1276
FAX: 202 566-1546
E-Mail: Amson.Jonathan@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Virginia Fox-Norse Environmental Protection Agency
Water
4504T Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-1266
FAX: 202 566-1546
E-Mail: Fox-Norse.Virginia@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Water ( WATER ) RIN: 2040-AD40

View Related Documents

Title: Underground Injection Control: Update of State Programs

Abstract: The regulations at 40 CFR part 147 codify each State's UIC program description and incorporates by reference the rules and regulations that the respective primacy state will implement. This includes codifying programs upon which EPA directly implements. The primary reason for part 147 is to incorporate by reference into the Code of Federal Regulations the State program authorities and regulations so EPA may bring a direct enforcement action if the state fails to comply with the state UIC program. This update is necessary to ensure that the CFR accurately reflects current approved State UIC programs and that requirements of those programs are federally enforceable. EPA Regional Offices will be submitting State revision packages as they are completed. Part 147 will then be updated in several stages. This is the first stage. This effort should have no impact on the regulated community because EPA will merely be incorporating by reference elements of already approved State programs.Priority: Info./Admin./Other Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 147 (revision) (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 300h-1 SDWA 1422; 42 USC 300h-4 SDWA 1425 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Direct Final Rule 00/00/0000

Additional Information: SAN No. 4236

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No Agency Contact: Robert-Eu Smith Environmental Protection Agency

Water
4606M Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-3895
FAX: 202 564-3756
E-Mail: Smith.Robert-Eu@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Jeff Jollie Environmental Protection Agency
Water
WTR9 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-3886
FAX: 415 947-3549
E-Mail: Jollie.Jeff@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Water ( WATER ) RIN: 2040-AD87

View Related Documents

Title: Statement of Policy--NPDES Permit Requirements for Peak Wet Weather Discharges From Publicly Owned Treatment Work Treatment Plants Serving Sanitary Sewer Collection Systems

Abstract: During periods of wet weather, wastewater flows received by municipal sewage treatment plants can significantly increase, which can create operational challenges for sewage treatment facilities. Where peak flows approach or exceed the design capacity of a treatment plant they can seriously reduce treatment efficiency or damage treatment units. In addition to hydraulic concerns, wastewater associated with peak flows may have low organic strength, which can also decrease treatment efficiencies. One engineering practice that some facilities use to protect biological treatment units from damage and to prevent overflows and backups elsewhere in the system is referred to as wet weather blending. Wet weather blending occurs during peak wet weather flow events when flows that exceed the capacity of the biological units are routed around the biological units and blended with effluent from the biological units prior to discharge. Regulatory agencies, sewage treatment plant operators, and representatives of environmental advocacy groups have expressed uncertainty about National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) requirements addressing such situations. EPA requested public comment on a proposed policy published on November 7, 2003, and on a revised proposed policy on December 22, 2005. EPA did not finalize the policy. The policy options associated with this activity are still under review. EPA held a meeting with key stakeholders in July 2011 to discuss the issues addressed in the draft policy. EPA intends to consider the comments received from our workshop participants in determining next steps.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 122.41(m) (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 33 USC 1311; 33 USC 1318; 33 USC 1342; 33 USC 1361 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite
Final Policy 00/00/0000
1st Draft Policy 11/07/2003 68 FR 63042
2nd Draft Policy 12/22/2005 70 FR 76013Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OW-2005-0523

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State; Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: Undetermined Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.epa.gov/npdes

Sectors Affected: 22132 Agency Contact: Greg Schaner Environmental Protection Agency

Water
4203M Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-0721
FAX: 202 564-0742
E-Mail: Schaner.Greg@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Kevin Weiss Environmental Protection Agency
Water
4203M Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-0742
FAX: 202 564-0717
E-Mail: Weiss.Kevin@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Water ( WATER ) RIN: 2040-AF03

View Related Documents

Title: Development of Best Management Practices for Recreational Boats Under Section 312(o) of the Clean Water Act

Abstract: This action is for the development of regulations by EPA to implement the Clean Boating Act (Pub. L. 110-288), which was signed by the President on July 29, 2008. The Clean Boating Act amends section 402 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) to exclude recreational vessels from National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permitting requirements. In addition, it adds a new CWA section 312(o) directing EPA to develop regulations that identify the discharges incidental to the normal operation of recreational vessels (other than a discharge of sewage) for which it is reasonable and practicable to develop management practices to mitigate adverse impacts on waters of the United States. The regulations also need to include those management practices, including performance standards for each such practice. Following promulgation of the EPA performance standards, new CWA section 312(o) directs the Coast Guard to promulgate regulations governing the design, construction, installation, and use of the management practices. Following promulgation of the Coast Guard regulations, the Clean Boating Act prohibits the operation of a recreational vessel or any discharge incidental to their normal operation in waters of the United States and waters of the contiguous zone (i.e., 12 miles into the ocean), unless the vessel owner or operator is using an applicable management practice meeting the EPA-developed performance standards.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 140 (revision) (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 33 USC 1251 et seq Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

Other Statutory Clean Boating Act requires promulgation w/in 1 year of enactment. 07/29/2009

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 06/00/2013

Final Action 01/00/2014

Additional Information: SAN No. 5311

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: Undetermined

Sectors Affected: 713990; 336612; 441222; 483212; 713930; 441221; 488330; 487210 Agency Contact: Brian Rappoli Environmental Protection Agency
Water
4504T Washington , DC 20460Phone: 202 566-1548
E-Mail: Rappoli.Brian@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: John Lishman Environmental Protection Agency
Water
4504T Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-1364
E-Mail: Lishman.John@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Water ( WATER ) RIN: 2040-AF05

View Related Documents

Title: Oil and Gas Construction Stormwater Rule

Abstract: On June 12, 2006, EPA published a final rule to address a new provision added by the Energy Policy Act of 2005. The 2006 regulation effectively exempted from National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit requirements stormwater discharges of sediment from construction activities associated with oil and gas exploration, production, processing, or treatment operations or transmission facilities unless the relevant facility had a discharge of stormwater resulting in a discharge of a reportable quantity of oil or hazardous substances. Shortly thereafter, the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) petitioned the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals (Ninth Circuit) for direct review of EPA's action. On May 23, 2008, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued an opinion in NRDC v. U.S. EPA, 526 F.3d 591 (9th Cir. 2008), vacating EPA's 2006 oil and gas construction stormwater regulation. On July 21, 2008, EPA filed a petition for rehearing in this case. On November 3, 2008, the Ninth Circuit issued its order denying EPA's request for rehearing of the Court's decision vacating EPA's 2006 oil and gas construction stormwater regulation. This action will be included as part of EPA's Stormwater Regulations Revision to Address Discharges from Developed Sites (RIN 2040-AD13). EPA will (1) remove the codified 2006 rule from the Code of Federal Regulations consistent with the court vacatur and (2) codify the revised 2005 Energy Policy Act definition of "oil and gas exploration, production, processing, treatment, and transmission operations" to clarify that certain uncontaminated discharges from oil and gas construction activities are exempt from permitting as identified in section 402(I)(2) of the Clean Water Act.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 122.26(a)(2)(ii) (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 33 USC 1342(l) and 1362(24) Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

Other Statutory The oil and gas rule court-ordered vacatur took effect on November 19,
2008. 11/19/2008

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Action 00/00/0000

NPRM 00/00/0000

Additional Information: SAN No. 5330

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No Agency Contact: Bryan Rittenhouse Environmental Protection Agency
Water
4203M Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-0577
FAX: 202 564-6431
E-Mail: Rittenhouse.Bryan@epa.gov Agency Contact: Connie Bosma Environmental Protection Agency

Water
4203M Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-6773
FAX: 202 564-6431
E-Mail: bosma.connie@epa.govEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA) Water ( WATER ) RIN: 2040-AF28

View Related Documents

Title: National Primary Drinking Water Regulations: Regulation of Perchlorate

Abstract: The Agency announced in February 2011 that it is beginning development of a national drinking water regulation for perchlorate in drinking water. The Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) section 1412(b)(1)-(6) describes EPA's requirements for regulating contaminants. In accordance with these requirements, the Agency will evaluate the health effects of perchlorate, the feasibility of treatment, the affordability of treatment for small systems, the costs and the benefits (as part of the Health Risk Reduction Cost Analysis), and how a standard would be implemented (e.g. monitoring requirements). EPA also plans to seek input through informal and formal processes from the Science Advisory Board, the National Drinking Water Advisory Council, the Department of Health and Human Services, State and Tribal drinking water programs, the regulated community (public water systems), public health organizations, academia, environmental and public interest groups, and other interested stakeholders on a number of issues relating to the regulation.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 141; 40 CFR 142 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 300f et seq Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

NPRM Statutory May extend final regulation to May 11, 2015 02/11/2013

Other Statutory 08/11/2014

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 03/00/2013

Final Action 05/00/2015

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OW-2011-03331

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://water.epa.gov/drink/contaminants/unregulated/perchlorate.cfm Agency Contact: Daniel Olson Environmental Protection Agency

Water
4607M Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-5239
E-Mail: Olson.Daniel@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Eric Burneson Environmental Protection Agency
Water
4607M Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-5250
E-Mail: Burneson.Eric@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Water ( WATER ) RIN: 2040-AF29

View Related Documents

Title: National Primary Drinking Water Regulations: Group Regulation of Carcinogenic Volatile Organic Compound (VOCs)

Abstract: The Agency announced in February 2011 that it plans to develop one national primary drinking water regulation (NPDWR) covering up to 16 carcinogenic VOCs. EPA will propose a regulation to address carcinogenic contaminants as groups rather than individually in order to provide public health protections more quickly and also allow utilities to more effectively and efficiently plan for improvements. PCE and TCE, which the Agency determined were candidates for regulatory revision under the second six year review of the existing NPDWRs will be included in the VOC drinking water standard. Besides PCE and TCE, the group may include up to six additional regulated VOCs; and up to eight unregulated VOCs from the EPA's Contaminant Candidate List 3. SDWA section 1412(b)(1)-(6) describes EPA's requirements for regulating contaminants. In accordance with these requirements, the Agency will evaluate the health effects of carcinogenic VOCs, the feasibility of treatment, theaffordability of treatment for small systems, the costs and the benefits (as part of the Health Risk Reduction Cost Analysis), and implementation of a carcinogenic standard. EPA has reached out to stakeholders via multiple meetings and the web before deciding to develop the carcinogenic VOC group rule. EPA also plans to seek input from the Science Advisory Board, the National Drinking Water Advisory Council, the Department of Health and Human Services and State and Tribal drinking water programs prior to promulgating a proposed rule.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 141; 40 CFR 142 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 300f et seq Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 10/00/2013

Final Action 04/00/2015

Additional Information: Includes Retrospective Review under E.O. 13563.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://water.epa.gov/lawsregs/rulesregs/sdwa/dwstrategy/index.cfm Agency Contact: Yvette Selby-Mohamadu Environmental Protection Agency

Water
4607M Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-5245
E-Mail: Selby-Mohamadu.Yvette@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Rajiv Khera Environmental Protection Agency
Water
4607M Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-4881
E-Mail: Khera.Rajiv@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Water ( WATER ) RIN: 2040-AF30

View Related Documents

Title: Clean Water Protection Rule

Abstract: After U.S. Supreme Court decisions in SWANCC and Rapanos, the scope of "waters of the U.S." protected under all CWA programs has been an issue of considerable debate and uncertainty. The Act has a single definition for "waters of the United States." As a result, these decisions affect the geographic scope of all CWA programs. SWANCC and Rapanos did not invalidate the current regulatory definition of "waters of the United States." However, the decisions established important considerations for how those regulations should be interpreted, and experience implementing the regulations has identified several areas that could benefit from additional clarification through rulemaking. U.S. EPA and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers are developing a proposed rule for determining whether a waterway, water body, or wetland is protected by the Clean Water Act. This rule would make clear which water bodies are protected under the Clean Water Act.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: Not Yet Determined Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 00/00/0000

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: UndeterminedEnergy Affected: No Agency Contact: Donna Downing Environmental Protection Agency
Water
4502T Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-1367
E-Mail: Downing.Donna@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Rachel Fertik Environmental Protection Agency
Water
4502T Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-1452
E-Mail: Fertik.Rachel@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Water ( WATER ) RIN: 2040-AD09

View Related Documents

Title: Test Procedures for the Analysis of Co-Planar and Mono-Ortho-Substituted Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) Under the
Clean Water Act

Abstract: This no longer needs to be an independent action since EPA has combined this test with the Expedited Methods Update Rule (RIN 2040-AF09).

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 136 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 33 USC 1314; 33 USC 1361(a) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Withdrawn 12/08/2011

Additional Information: SAN No. 4049

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State; Tribal

Small Entities Affected: Business; Governmental Jurisdictions Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://water.epa.gov/scitech/swguidance/methods/index.cfm Agency Contact: Maria Gomez-Taylor Environmental Protection Agency

Water
4303T Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-1005
FAX: 202 566-1053
E-Mail: gomez-taylor.maria@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Water ( WATER ) RIN: 2040-AD54

View Related Documents

Title: National Secondary Drinking Water Regulations (NSDWR): Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether (MTBE) and Technical Corrections
to the NSDWR

Abstract: Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether (MTBE) was primarily used as an automobile fuel additive, introduced in the late 1970s during lead phase-out as an octane enhancer. Production increased in the 1990s to meet the requirement of the federal Reformulated Gasoline (RFG) and Oxyfuels programs required by the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990. However, MTBE has been detected in ground water and drinking water in a number of states due to leaking underground storage tanks and leaking pipelines. At least 25 states passed laws banning or limiting MTBE use, and MTBE use declined after 1999. Refiners removed MTBE from gasoline in 2006. MTBE's distinctive turpentine-like taste and odor can be detected at low levels. In 1997, EPA issued a drinking water advisory of 20 to 40 micrograms per liter based on taste and odor . Monitoring data for public watersystems found that most drinking water detections are below this taste and odor threshold. Presently, the Agency is revising the
health assessment for MTBE. More information on the health assessment can be found on EPA's website at http://www.epa.gov/iris/subst/0545.htm and general information on MTBE can be found on EPA's website at http://water.epa.gov/drink/contaminants/unregulated/mtbe.cfm

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 143 (revision) (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 300f et seq Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Withdrawn 08/16/2011

Additional Information: SAN No. 4404

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 22131 Agency Contact: Meredith Benedict Environmental Protection Agency
Water
4607M Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-0814
FAX: 202 564-3760
E-Mail: Benedict.Meredith@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Water ( WATER ) RIN: 2040-AE82

View Related Documents

Title: Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for Chlorine and Chlorinated Hydrocarbon Manufacturing Process

Abstract: EPA has considered amendments to the Organic Chemicals, Plastics, and Synthetic Fibers (OCPSF) Point Source Category (40 CFR 414) and the Inorganic Chemicals Point Source Category (40 CFR 415) to address discharges of pollutants including dioxin. As a result of extensive monitoring by both the industry and EPA, EPA has determined that the pollutant discharges do not to present a concern at this time. Therefore, EPA no longer intends to develop and propose revised standards for the OCPSF and Inorganic Chemicals point source categories.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 414 (revision); 40 CFR 415 (revision) (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: CWA301; CWA304; CWA306; CWA307; CWA308; CWA501 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Withdrawn 12/08/2011

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OW-2005-0012

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: Undetermined Energy Affected: Undetermined

RIN Information
URL: https://owpubauthor.epa.gov/scitech/wastetech/guide/cch/

Sectors Affected: 325181; 325188; 325199; 325211 Agency Contact: Samantha Lewis Environmental Protection Agency

Water
4303TWashington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-1058
FAX: 202 566-1053
E-Mail: lewis.samantha@epa.gov Agency Contact: Janet Goodwin Environmental Protection Agency

Water
4303T Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-1060
E-Mail: Goodwin.Janet@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Water ( WATER ) RIN: 2040-AF06

View Related Documents

Title: 2010 Effluent Guidelines Program Plan

Abstract: The Clean Water Act (CWA) requires EPA to establish national technology-based regulations known as "effluent limitations guidelines and standards" to reduce pollutant discharges from categories of industrial facilities. EPA similarly establishes technology-based regulations, termed "pretreatment standards," to reduce indirect pollutant discharges" those that are discharged to publicly-owned treatment works. The CWA also specifies effluent guideline planning and review requirements. There are different requirements for direct and indirect dischargers, but both specify annual review of promulgated effluent guidelines and pretreatment standards. One requirement is publication of an Effluent Guidelines Program Plan every two years. CWA section 304(m) specifies that the Plan must: (1) establish a schedule for the annual review and revision of promulgated effluent guidelines, (2) identify categories of sources discharging toxic or non-conventional pollutants for which guidelines have not previously been published ("new categories"); and (3) establish a schedule for the promulgation of effluent guidelines identified under (2). We anticipate that the 2010 Plan will describe the results of the 2010 annual review, including, to the extent possible: (1) the outcome of the screening process; (2) EPA’s selection of industrial categories for further study and/or regulation; and (3) the rationale for selecting categories for further study and/or regulation. The 2010 Plan will also summarize activities and accomplishments for studies of categories that were identified in the 2008 Final Plan.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: None (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 33 USC 1314; 33 USC 1316; 33 USC 1317 Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

Other Statutory 12/31/2010

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite
Preliminary 12/28/2009 74 FR 68599

Notice 10/26/2011 76 FR 66286

Comment Period End 11/25/2011

Additional Information: EPA publication information: Preliminary - http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=EPA-HQOW-2008-0517-0050; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OW-2008-0517

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://water.epa.gov/lawsregs/lawsguidance/cwa/304m/ Agency Contact: William Swietlik Environmental Protection Agency

Water
4303T Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-1129
FAX: 202 566-1053
E-Mail: swietlik.william@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Janet Goodwin Environmental Protection Agency

Water
4303T Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-1060E-Mail: Goodwin.Janet@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Water ( WATER ) RIN: 2040-AF12

View Related Documents

Title: Amendment to Effluent Guidelines for Primary Aluminum Smelting Subcategory of the Nonferrous Metals Manufacturing Point Source Category

Abstract: EPA has considered an amendment to 40 CFR 421 to create updated discharge standards for those primary aluminum smelters that use both wet and dry scrubbing of their air emissions. The concern over the existing requirement has upon careful evaluation been determined not to present a compliance problem at this time. Therefore, EPA no longer intends to develop and propose revised standards for the primary aluminum subcategory of the nonferrous metals point source category.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 421 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: CWA 301; CWA 304; CWA 306; CWA 307; CWA 308; CWA 501 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Withdrawn 08/18/2011

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OW-2010-0137

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 331312 Agency Contact: Ahmar Siddiqui Environmental Protection Agency

Water
4303T Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-1044
FAX: 202 566-1053
E-Mail: Siddiqui.Ahmar@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Janet Goodwin Environmental Protection Agency

Water
4303T Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-1060
E-Mail: Goodwin.Janet@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Water ( WATER ) RIN: 2040-AF23

View Related Documents

Title: Withdrawal of Certain Federal Aquatic Life Water Quality Criteria Applicable to Wisconsin

Abstract: In 1997, Wisconsin developed revised water quality criteria to comply with the 1995 Great Lakes Initiative, a multistate comprehensive plan to restore the health of the Great Lakes Basin. In 2000, EPA disapproved a subset of Wisconsin's criteria, including its chronic and acute aquatic life criteria for copper and nickel, and chronic aquatic life criteria endrin and selenium. As a result of the disapproval, EPA subsequently published a final rule effective February 5, 2001, making the following aquatic life criteria in 40 CFR part 132.6 effective for waters of the Great Lakes System in the State of Wisconsin: 1) Chronic and acute copper and nickel in tables 1 and 2 of 40 CFR part 132.6(f); 2) chronic endrin in table 2 of 40 CFR part 132.6(f); and 3) Chronic selenium in table 2 of 40 CFR part 132.6(g). Wisconsin began rulemaking in January 2008 to address the six aquatic life criteria for these four pollutants and in December 2008 the State finalized its criteria. EPA approved Wisconsin's revised aquatic life water quality criteria on July 1, 2009, with the exception of the chronic aquatic life criterion for selenium for waters designated by Wisconsin as Limited Forage Fish aquatic life use. EPA determined that these revised criteria adequately protect waters of the State at a level consistent with the federal requirements of the Clean Water Act and its implementing regulations at 40 CFR part 131. EPA proposed to withdraw its aquatic life criteria for chronic and acute copper and nickel (40 CFR part 132.6(f)) in all surface waters of Wisconsin designated for aquatic life uses. EPA also proposed toamend the chronic aquatic life criterion for endrin (40 CFR sec. 132.6(f)) to apply exclusively to waters designated by Wisconsin a Warm Water Sportfish and Warm Water Forage Fish aquatic life use, and selenium (40 CFR sec. 132.6(g)) to apply exclusively to areas designated as Limited Forage Fish aquatic life use. While EPA approved Wisconsin's revised chronic aquatic life criterion for endrin, the number published in Wisconsin's regulation at NR 105 for Warm Water Sportfish and War Water Forage Fish use is not identical to the number received and approved by EPA. Therefore EPA will not withdraw thechronic endrin criterion for these uses at this time. The proposed withdrawal will enable Wisconsin to implement its EPAapproved aquatic life criteria in all waters of the State designated for aquatic life uses.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 132.6(f); 40 CFR 132.6(g) (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 33 USC 1751 et seq Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 03/16/2011 76 FR 14351

Final Action 09/16/2011 76 FR 57646

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No Agency Contact: Lisa Larimer Environmental Protection Agency
Water
4305T Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202-566-1017
FAX: 202-566-9981
E-Mail: Larimer.Lisa@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Francine Norling Environmental Protection Agency
Water
WQ-16J Chicago , IL 60604
Phone: 312 886-0271
E-Mail: Norling.Francine@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Water ( WATER ) RIN: 2040-AF24

View Related Documents

Title: National Primary Drinking Water Regulations; Arsenic and Clarifications to Compliance and New Source Contaminants Monitoring (Section 610 Review)

Abstract: On January 22, 2001, EPA revised the Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) for arsenic to 0.010 mg/L (10.0 μg/L). This regulation applies to non-transient non-community water systems and to community water systems (66 FR 6976). While EPA took steps to evaluate and mitigate impacts on small entities as part of the promulgation of the Arsenic Rule, EPA reviewed the National Primary Drinking Water Rule (NPDWR) for arsenic pursuant to section 610 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 USC 610). As part of this review, EPA considered and solicited comments on the following factors: (1) The continued need for the rule; (2) the nature of complaints or comments received concerning the rule; (3) the complexity of the rule; (4) the extent to which the rule overlaps, duplicates, or conflicts with other Federal, State, or local government rules; and (5) the degree to which the technology, economic conditions or other factors have changed in the area affected by the rule. EPA has reviewed comments received in response to this review, which identified concerns related to the cost associated with treatment, disposal of waste streams, compliance determinations for the maximum contaminant level (MCL), risk communication and difficulty using alternative treatment technologies. EPA identified available resources to address these concerns and has made a determination not to revise the regulation at this time. See EPA's report summarizing the results of this review in the docket EPA-OW-2010- 0728. This docket can be accessed at www.regulations.gov.

Priority: Info./Admin./Other Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 5 USC 610 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:Action Date FR Cite

Final Rule 01/22/2001 66 FR 6976

Initiate 610 Review 12/20/2010 75 FR 79856

End Comment Period 02/18/2011
Completion of 610 Review 08/16/2011

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA-OW-2010-0728

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/sbrefa/section610.html Agency Contact: Stephanie Flaharty Environmental Protection Agency

Water Environmental Protection Agency, Water Mail Code 4601M Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-5072
E-Mail: flaharty.stephanie@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Solid Waste and Emergency Response ( SWER ) RIN: 2050-AE87

View Related Documents

Title: Revisions to the National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan; Subpart J Product Schedule Listing Requirements

Abstract: EPA is considering proposing revisions to subpart J of the National Contingency Plan (NCP). The Clean Water Act requires EPA to prepare a schedule of dispersants, other chemicals, and other spill mitigating devices and substances, if any, that may be used in carrying out the NCP. Under subpart J, respondents wishing to add a product to the Product Schedule must submit technical product data to EPA. The Agency is considering revisions to subpart J to clarify and/or change the effectiveness and toxicity testing protocols required for adding a product to the Schedule. These changes, if finalized, will help ensure protection of the environment when these products are used to clean up and mitigate oil spills (1) into or upon navigable waters, adjoining shorelines, or the waters of the contiguous zone, or (2) which may affect natural resources belonging to or under the exclusive management authority of the United States. Further, the Agency is considering proposed changes to 40 CFR 110.4 regarding the use of dispersants.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 300; 40 CFR 110 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 33 USC 1321(d)(2); 33 USC 1321(b)(3); CWA 311(d)(2) Legal Deadline: None

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: The unprecedented use of dispersants on the surface and in the subsea during the 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico raised many questions about dispersant efficacy, toxicity, environmental fate, and monitoring. The public and officials working at local, State, and Federal levels expressed concerns regarding the effects of dispersant use on the ecosystem. These concerns require a review of the product toxicity and efficacy testing and application in the current subpart J regulatory requirements. Additionally, the large-scale submission of oil-mitigating technologies through theInteragency Alternative Technology Assessment Program (IATAP) as a result of this incident also highlights the need to reevaluate the current subpart J regulations, particularly the technical data requirements.

Legal Basis: The Federal Water Pollution Control Act (FWPCA) requires the President to prepare and publish a National Contingency Plan (NCP) for the removal of oil and hazardous substances. In turn, the President delegated the authority to implement this section of the FWPCA to EPA through Executive Order 12777 (56 FR 54757; Oct. 22, 1991). Section 311(d)(2)(G)(i) of the FWPCA (a.k.a., Clean Water Act), as amended by the OPA, requires that the NCP include a schedule identifying "dispersants, other chemicals, and other spill mitigating devices and substances, if any, that may be used in carrying out" the NCP. Currently, the use of dispersants, other chemicals, and other oil spill mitigating devices and substances (e.g., bioremediation agents) to respond to oil spills in U.S. waters is governed by subpart J of the NCP (40 CFR part 300 series 900).

Alternatives: To be determined.

Costs and Benefits: To be determined.Risks: To be determined.

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Action 00/00/0000

NPRM 08/00/2012

Additional Information: Includes Retrospective Review under E.O.13563.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State; Tribal

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.epa.gov/oilspill

Sectors Affected: 3251; 325; 3259; 54 Agency Contact: William Nichols Environmental Protection Agency Solid Waste and Emergency Response
5104A Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-1970
FAX: 202 564-2625
E-Mail: nichols.nick@epa.gov Agency Contact: Leigh DeHaven Environmental Protection Agency Solid Waste and Emergency Response
5104A Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-1974
FAX: 202 564-2625
E-Mail: dehaven.leigh@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Solid Waste and Emergency Response ( SWER ) RIN: 2050-AG46

View Related Documents

Title: Revising Underground Storage Tank Regulations--Revisions to Existing Requirements and New Requirements for Secondary Containment and Operator Training

Abstract: The Underground Storage Tank (UST) regulations were first promulgated in 1988 primarily to prevent releases from retail petroleum marketers (gas stations) and other facilities into the environment. These regulations have reduced the incidents of contamination. However, there is a need to revise the regulations to incorporate changes to the UST program from the Energy Policy Act of 2005, as well as to update outdated portions of the regulations due to changes in technology since the 1980s. On August 8, 2005, President Bush signed the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPAct). Title XV, subtitle B of this act (entitled the Underground Storage Tank Compliance Act of 2005), amends subtitle I of the Solid Waste Disposal Act, the original legislation that created the UST program. There are key provisions of the EPAct that apply to states receiving federal UST funding but do not apply in Indian Country, including requirements for secondary containment and operator training. As a part of this action, EPA plans to develop regulations for secondary containment and operator training to apply in Indian Country and in states that choose not to obtain State Program Approval from EPA in order to achieve more consistent program results in release prevention and compliance. Both EPA and tribes recognize the importance of having requirements that can help to ensure parity in program implementation between states and in Indian Country, which is consistent with EPA's policy. Through this action, EPA will ensure federal enforceability of the EPAct provisions across the country. EPA will also use our knowledge of the program gained over the last 20 years to update and revise the regulations to make targeted changes to improve implementation and prevent UST releases.

Priority: Economically Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: Yes Unfunded Mandates: Private Sector

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 280 to 281 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 6991 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Action 00/00/0000

NPRM 11/18/2011 76 FR 71708

NPRM Comment Period End 02/16/2012

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State; TribalSmall Entities Affected: Business; Governmental Jurisdictions Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/oust/

Sectors Affected: 72; 481; 48811; 112; 111; 2211; 447; 622; 31-33; 486; 44-45; 485; 484; 483; 42 Agency Contact: Elizabeth McDermott Environmental Protection Agency Solid Waste and Emergency Response
5401P Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703 603-7175
FAX: 703 603-0175
E-Mail: McDermott.Elizabeth@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Paul Miller Environmental Protection Agency Solid Waste and Emergency Response
5401P Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703 603-7165
FAX: 703 603-0175
E-Mail: Miller.Paul@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Solid Waste and Emergency Response ( SWER ) RIN: 2050-AG66

View Related Documents

Title: CERCLA/EPCRA Reporting Requirements for Air Releases of Hazardous Substances From Animal Waste at Farms

Abstract: On December 18, 2008, EPA published a Final Rule, "CERCLA/EPCRA Administrative Reporting Exemption for Air Releases of Hazardous Substances from Animal Waste at Farms (73 FR 76948) ("the Final Rule"). The Final Rule established exemptions from certain reporting requirements under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), and the Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Act (EPCRA). On January 15, 2009, Waterkeeper Alliance, Sierra Club, the Humane Society of the United States, Environmental Integrity Project, the Center for Food Safety, and Citizens for Pennsylvania's Future (collectively, "Waterkeeper") filed a Petition for Review of the Final Rule. The petition challenged the exemptions under both CERCLA and EPCRA. On March 17, 2009, the National Pork Producers Council filed its Petition for Review challenging a portion of the Final Rule that amended the EPCRA regulations. The two cases were consolidated. On February 11, 2009, the National Chicken Council, National Turkey Federation, and U.S. Poultry & Egg Association moved to intervene on behalf of EPA to assert their interests in the Final Rule. Since August 25, 2009, this case has been held in abeyance so that the Parties could participate in the D.C. Circuit Mediation Program. The mediation process did not resolve the issues raised by all of the Parties, but it did raise issues warranting reconsideration of the final rule by EPA. As such, EPA sought and received a voluntary remand, without vacatur of the Final Rule during the re-evaluation period. In this action, EPA is reconsidering the Final Rule based on (1) policy choices that were initially made in the promulgation of the Final Rule, (2) views that were articulated by the Parties during the mediation process and (3) additional data that is now available.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 302; 40 CFR 355 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 9603; 42 USC 11004 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 08/00/2012

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-SFUND-2007-0469

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State; Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 112 Agency Contact: Lynn Beasley Environmental Protection Agency Solid Waste and Emergency Response
5104A Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-1965
FAX: 202 564-2625
E-Mail: beasley.lynn@epa.govEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA) Solid Waste and Emergency Response ( SWER ) RIN: 2050-AG67

View Related Documents

Title: Addition of Subsurface Component to the Hazard Ranking System (HRS)

Abstract: The Hazard Ranking System (HRS), required by the Superfund statute, is the primary mechanism used by EPA to assess the relative threat associated with actual or potential releases of hazardous substances. As a matter of Agency policy, those sites that score 28.50 or greater under the HRS are eligible for inclusion on the National Priorities List (NPL). The NPL is intended primarily to guide the EPA in determining which sites warrant further investigation. A score of 28.50 does not represent a specified level of risk but is a cutoff point that serves as a screening-level indicator of the highest priority releases or threatened releases. The HRS includes four scoring pathways - ground water, surface water, air and soil exposure. Additional pathways have been identified as posing significant threats to human health and the environment that should be considered when evaluating sites for the NPL. One such pathway is vapor intrusion. Vapor intrusion occurs when contaminants enter into indoor spaces, generally residences, from environmental sources such as contaminated ground water or contaminated soil. Over the past decade EPA and state environmental programs have learned significantly more information regarding the risk that this pathway poses to human health. Historically, EPA’s Superfund program has responded to vapor intrusion contamination by two mechanisms: (1) through its emergency response program at sites not on the NPL, or (2) through sites placed on the NPL because of other pathway-related risks. In a May 2010 report, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) concluded that if vapor intrusion sites are not assessed and, if needed, listed on the NPL, some seriously contaminated hazardous waste sites with unacceptable human exposure may not otherwise be cleaned up. Thus, EPA is working toward a proposed rulemaking to add a new screening component to the HRS that would allow sites with vapor intrusion contamination to be evaluated for placement on the NPL. This addition would enable the HRS to directly consider the human exposure to contaminants that enter building structures through the subsurface environment.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 300 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 9601 et seq Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite
Notice of Opportunity for Public Input 01/31/2011 76 FR 5370

NPRM 04/00/2012

Additional Information: EPA publication information: Notice of Opportunity for Public Inputhttp://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-SFUND-2010-1086

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State; Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/npl/hrsaddition.htm Agency Contact: Terry Jeng Environmental Protection Agency Solid Waste and Emergency Response
5204P Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703 603-8852
E-Mail: Jeng.Terry@epa.gov Agency Contact: Dennis Munhall Environmental Protection Agency Solid Waste and Emergency Response
ERRD-SPB-PRS New York , NY 10007
Phone: 212 637-4343
E-Mail: Munhall.Dennis@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Solid Waste and Emergency Response ( SWER ) RIN: 2050-AG68

View Related Documents

Title: Revisions to the Export Requirements of the Cathode Ray Tube (CRT) RuleAbstract: The Agency is considering a proposal to revise the cathode ray tube (CRT) final rule published on July 28, 2006 (71 FR 42927) to address certain implementation concerns. We are considering adding a definition of "exporter," which will clarify the liabilities of intermediaries, such as brokers, in fulfilling the export-related requirements of the rule. We are also considering including additional items to the notification required for CRTs exported for reuse. These requirements will make it easier to enforce the export requirements of the rule and will enable the Agency to obtain additional information on the export of this
class of used electronics.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 261 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 6912(a); 42 USC 6921-6925 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 05/00/2012

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: Undetermined Energy Affected: No Agency Contact: Marilyn Goode Environmental Protection Agency Solid Waste and Emergency Response
5304P Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703 308-8800
FAX: 703 308-0514
E-Mail: Goode.Marilyn@epa.gov Agency Contact: Charlotte Mooney Environmental Protection Agency Solid Waste and Emergency Response
5304P Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703 308-7025
FAX: 703 308-0514
E-Mail: Mooney.Charlotte@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Solid Waste and Emergency Response ( SWER ) RIN: 2050-AE51

View Related Documents

Title: Modifications to RCRA Rules Associated With Solvent-Contaminated Industrial Wipes

Abstract: In 2003, EPA proposed to modify the Resouce Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) hazardous waste regulations for management of solvent-contaminated industrial wipes. EPA proposed to conditionally exclude wipes that are disposed of from the definition of hazardous waste and to conditionally exclude laundered wipes from the definition of solid waste. Based on comments received on the proposal, EPA revised its risk analysis used to evaluate the risks to human health and the environment if solvent-contaminated wipes or laundry sludge are disposed of in a municipal solid waste landfill. A Notice of Data Availability was published in the Federal Register to allow the public the opportunity to comment on the revised risk analysis. If finalized, this regulation will impact the management of two types of solvent-contaminated wipes: (1) wipes disposed of in land disposal units or by combustion after use, and (2) wipes that are laundered after use to remove the solvent and then are used again.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 261 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 6921 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 11/20/2003 68 FR 65586
Notice of Data Availability 10/27/2009 74 FR 55163

Extension of Comment Period 12/15/2009 74 FR 66259

Final Action 06/00/2012Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM -http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=09000064800e10e1; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQRCRA-2003-0004

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; State; Local; Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/epawaste/index.htm

Sectors Affected: 323; 325; 332; 333; 334; 336; 337; 441; 811; 812 Agency Contact: Amanda Geldard Environmental Protection Agency Solid Waste and Emergency Response
5304P Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703-347-8975
FAX: 703 308-0514
E-Mail: Geldard.Amanda@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Solid Waste and Emergency Response ( SWER ) RIN: 2050-AF08

View Related Documents

Title: Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act: Modification to the Threshold Planning Quantity Methodology for the Extremely Hazardous Substances That are Solids in Solution

Abstract: EPA is considering an alternative approach for the threshold planning quantity (TPQ) for chemicals on the Extremely Hazardous Substances (EHSs) List that are handled as solids in solution. The current TPQ for solids in solution is based on the assumption that the entire quantity of the solid chemical at a facility could potentially be released to air in the event of an accident. EPA is considering revising the TPQ for solids in solution. EPA is pursuing this in part based on industry's request to revisit the TPQ rationale for the chemical paraquat dichloride (handled as a solid in aqueous solution). EPA has evaluated various experimental data for accidental air releases of solutions containing solid chemicals when developing revised TPQs. EPA is also considering public comment on the appropriateness of considering aerosol size as a factor for potential off-site exposure to communities.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 355 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 1102 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 04/15/2011 76 FR 21299

NPRM Comment Period End 06/14/2011

Final Action 08/00/2012

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM - http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=EPA-HQSFUND-2010-0586-0001; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-SFUND-2010-0586

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Local; State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.epa.gov/oem Agency Contact: Kathy Franklin Environmental Protection Agency Solid Waste and Emergency Response
5104A Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-7987
FAX: 202 564-2625
E-Mail: Franklin.Kathy@epa.gov Agency Contact: Sicy Jacob Environmental Protection Agency Solid Waste and Emergency Response
5104A Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-8019FAX: 202 564-2625
E-Mail: Jacob.Sicy@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Solid Waste and Emergency Response ( SWER ) RIN: 2050-AG52

View Related Documents

Title: Hazardous Waste Technical Corrections and Clarifications Rule

Abstract: On March 18, 2010, EPA published a Direct Final Rule (Hazardous Waste Technical Corrections and Clarifications Rule) that promulgated a number of amendments to the hazardous waste regulations for hazardous waste identification, manifesting, the generator requirements, as well as changes to the hazardous waste permit and interim status standards. These changes corrected existing errors in the hazardous waste regulations that have occurred over time as a result of typographical errors or incorrect citations to paragraphs and other references. On June 16, 2010, all of the amendments to the Direct Final Rule went into effect, except for six amendments which were withdrawn (June 4, 2010) because adverse comments were received. The final rule will address two of the six withdrawn amendments. The other four amendments will be the subject of a different rulemaking.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 261; 40 CFR 262; 40 CFR 266 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 6905 to 6906; 42 USC 6912; 42 USC 6921 to 6927; 42 USC 6930; 42 USC 6933 to 6939; 42 USC

6974 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Direct Final Action 03/18/2010 75 FR 12989

NPRM 03/18/2010 75 FR 13066

NPRM Comment Period End 05/03/2010

Partial Withdrawal Notice 06/04/2010 75 FR 31716

Final Action 01/00/2012

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM - http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=0900006480ac0398; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ--
RCRA-2008-0678

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No Agency Contact: Jim OLeary Environmental Protection Agency Solid Waste and Emergency Response
5304P Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703 308-8827
FAX: 703 308-0514
E-Mail: OLeary.Jim@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Solid Waste and Emergency Response ( SWER ) RIN: 2050-AG64

View Related Documents

Title: Hazardous Chemical Reporting; Community Right-to-Know: Revisions to the Emergency and Hazardous Chemical Inventory Forms (Tier I and Tier II)

Abstract: The Agency is revising the Emergency and Hazardous Chemical Inventory Forms (Tier I and II) under section 312 of the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA) to require additional data elements and revise some existing data elements.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 47 CFR 370 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 9601 et seqLegal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 08/08/2011 76 FR 48093

NPRM Comment Period End 10/07/2011

Final Action 04/00/2012

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM - http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=EPA-HQSFUND-2010-0763-0001; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-SFUND-2010-0763-0001

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State; Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/oem/content/epcra/index.htm

Sectors Affected: 51; 31-33; 44-45; 48-49; 22; 42 Agency Contact: Sicy Jacob Environmental Protection Agency Solid Waste and Emergency Response
5104A Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-8019
FAX: 202 564-2625
E-Mail: Jacob.Sicy@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Solid Waste and Emergency Response ( SWER ) RIN: 2050-AE81

View Related Documents

Title: Standards for the Management of Coal Combustion Residuals Generated by Commercial Electric Power Producers

Abstract: This action is for the development of regulations for coal combustion residuals (also referred to as coal combustion waste). The regulations will apply to the management of coal combustion residuals that are generated by steam electric power generators, i.e., electric utilities and independent power producers and are disposed of in landfills and surface impoundments. The intended benefits of this action will be to prevent contamination or damage to ground waters and surface waters, thereby avoiding risk to human health and the environment, including ecological risks. The Agency issued on August 29, 2007, a Notice of Data Availability announcing the availability for public inspection and comment new information and data on the management of coal combustion residuals. The Agency considered these comments in developing the proposed rule regarding the regulation of coal combustion residuals under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). EPA issued a proposed rule on June 21, 2010, in which the Agency co-proposed two approaches- one which would regulate coal combustion residuals under subtitle C of RCRA as a "special waste" and one under subtitle D of RCRA as a non-hazardous waste. Under both approaches, coal combustion residuals that are beneficially used would remain Bevill exempt.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 257; 40 CFR 261; 40 CFR 264; 40 CFR 265; 40 CFR 268; 40 CFR 271; 40 CFR 302 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 6905; 42 USC 6906; 42 USC 6907(a)(3); 42 USC 6912; 42 USC 6912(a); 42 USC 6912(a)(1); 42 USC 6921; 42 USC 6922; 42 USC 6923; 42 USC 6924; 42 USC 6925; 42 USC 6925(j); 42 USC 6935; 42 USC 6936; 42 USC 6937; 42 USC 6944(a); 42 USC 6949a(c); 33 USC 1345(d); 33 USC 1345(e) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Action 00/00/0000

NODA 08/29/2007 72 FR 49714

NPRM 06/21/2010 75 FR 35128
Notice - Public Hearings 07/15/2010 75 FR 41121
Notice - Public Meeting--- 08/05/2010
Notice - Public Meeting-- 08/12/2010

Notice - Correction, Extension of Comment Period, and Additional Public Hearings 08/20/2010 75 FR 51434

Notice - Public Meeting - 10/06/2010

Notice - Additions to Docket 10/21/2010 75 FR 64974
Notice - Public Hearing 10/27/2010NODA and Request for Comment 10/12/2011 76 FR 63252
NODA re Info Submitted in Response to NPRM 10/12/2011 76 FR 63252

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NODA-http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-WASTE/2007/August/Day29/f17138.pdf; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-RCRA-2009-0640

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State;

Tribal

Small Entities Affected: Business; Governmental Jurisdictions Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/epawaste/nonhaz/industrial/special/fossil/ccrrule/index.htm

Sectors Affected: 221112 Agency Contact: Alexander Livnat Environmental Protection Agency Solid Waste and Emergency Response
5304P Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703 308-7251
FAX: 703 605-0595
E-Mail: Livnat.Alexander@epa.gov Agency Contact: Steve Souders Environmental Protection Agency Solid Waste and Emergency Response
5304P Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703 308-8431
FAX: 703 605-0595
E-Mail: souders.steve@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Solid Waste and Emergency Response ( SWER ) RIN: 2050-AF01

View Related Documents

Title: RCRA Smarter Waste Reporting

Abstract: By implementing the Smarter Waste Reporting initiative, EPA hopes to decrease the regulatory burden on respondents completing the Biennial Report (BR) by eliminating the form for waste shipped offsite. We plan to do this by proposing to: (1) substitute the BR data with the more-timely data from the eManifest system and (2) improve the information we currently receive from respondents who manage their waste onsite, in an effort to improve the quality of BR data. This rule is contingent upon legislative authority regarding the e-Manifest system and finalization of EPA's e-Manifest rule, and the system is developed and operational.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 262.41 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 6922(a)(6) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 00/00/0000

Additional Information: Includes Retrospective Review under EO 13563.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; State; Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 325; 2211; 332; 2122; 2111; 326; 331; 323; 3221; 482; 484; 5621; 5622; 483 Agency Contact: Peggy Vyas Environmental Protection Agency Solid Waste and Emergency Response
5303P Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703 308-5477
FAX: 703 308-8433E-Mail: vyas.peggy@epa.gov Agency Contact: Lori Furr Environmental Protection Agency Solid Waste and Emergency Response
5303P Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703 603-0596
FAX: 703 308-8433
E-Mail: furr.lori@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Solid Waste and Emergency Response ( SWER ) RIN: 2050-AG20

View Related Documents

Title: Hazardous Waste Manifest Revisions--Standards and Procedures for Electronic Manifests

Abstract: This action is aimed at finalizing the development of EPA's Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) regulatory standards and procedures that will govern the initiation, signing, transmittal, and retention of hazardous waste manifests using electronic documents and systems. There are a total of 5.1 million manifests processed each year, including state-defined hazardous waste paper manifests. EPA proposed electronic manifest standards in May 2001 as part of a more general manifest revision action that also addressed standardizing the paper manifest form's data elements and procedures (EPA Form 8700-22). The manifest form revisions were decoupled from action on the electronic manifest, and the Final Form Revisions Rule was published in the Federal Register on March 4, 2005. The May 2001 electronic manifest proposed rule was a standards-based decentralized approach under which EPA would establish and maintain the standards that would guide the development of electronic manifest systems by private sector entities that chose to participate in the system. However, since publication of the May 2001 proposed rule, EPA found that there is a broad consensus in favor of a single national "eManifest" system sponsored by EPA, rather than assorted de-centralized commercial systems. Subsequently, in May 2004, EPA conducted a manifest stakeholder meeting to collect additional stakeholder views on the future direction of eManifest. Based on public comment on the 2001 proposed electronic standards and stakeholder feedback at the May 2004 meeting, EPA publisheda Notice of Data Availability (NODA) on 18 April 2006 announcing EPA's preferred approach to develop a centralized webbased eManifest system to be hosted on EPA's Central Data Exchange (CDX) computer hub. However, EPA's ability to publish this final rule will depend on the passing of legislation that would provide EPA with authority to collect and retain user charges for the payment of the development and operation costs related to the eManifest system.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 260; 40 CFR 262; 40 CFR 263; 40 CFR 264; 40 CFR 265; 40 CFR 271 (To search for a specific CFR,

visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 6922; 42 USC 6923; 42 USC 6924; 42 USC 6926; PL 105-277 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Action 00/00/0000
NPRM Original 05/22/2001 66 FR 28240
Notice of Public Meeting 04/01/2004 69 FR 17145

NODA 04/18/2006 71 FR 19842

NODA #2 02/26/2008 73 FR 10204

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM Original - http://frwebgate2.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/PDFgate.cgi? WAISdocID=yLwpRg/13/2/0&WAISaction=retrieve; Split from RIN 2050-AE21; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-RCRA-2001- 0032. Includes Retrospective Review under EO 13563.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State; Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: www.epa.gov/epaoswer/hazwaste/gener/manifest/

Sectors Affected: 325; 2211; 332; 2122; 2111; 326; 331; 323; 3221; 482; 484; 5621; 5622; 483 Agency Contact: Rich LaShier Environmental Protection Agency Solid Waste and Emergency Response
5304P Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703 308-8796
FAX: 703 308-0514
E-Mail: LaShier.Rich@epa.govAgency Contact: Bryan Groce Environmental Protection Agency Solid Waste and Emergency Response
5304P Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703 308-8750
FAX: 703 308-0514
E-Mail: Groce.Bryan@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Solid Waste and Emergency Response ( SWER ) RIN: 2050-AG34

View Related Documents

Title: Revisions to Land Disposal Restrictions Treatment Standards and Amendments to Recycling Requirements for Spent Petroleum Refining Hydrotreating and Hydrorefining Catalysts

Abstract: In response to a rulemaking petition, the Environmental Protection Agency is considering amending the Land Disposal Restriction (LDR) treatment requirements for EPA Waste Codes K172 and F037. EPA is also responding to other elements of the rulemaking petition in this notice. Finally, in response to separate comments received from petroleum industry representatives, EPA is considering proposing a rule to help encourage consistent levels of recycling of spent hydrotreating and hydrorefining catalysts, in a manner that protects human health and the environment.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 261; 40 CFR 268; 40 CFR 271 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 1006; 42 USC 2002(a); 42 USC 3001 to 3009; 42 USC 3014; 42 USC 6905; 42 USC 6906; 42 CFR 6912; 42 USC 6921; 42 USC 6922; 42 USC 6924 to 6927; 42 USC 6934; 42 USC 6937; 42 USC 6938 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 00/00/0000
Notice of Data Availability 10/20/2003 68 FR 59935

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: Legacy Docket No. RCRA-2003-0023 for 10/20/03 NODA

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 562211; 32411 Agency Contact: Ross Elliott Environmental Protection Agency Solid Waste and Emergency Response
5304P Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703 308-8748
FAX: 703 308-0514
E-Mail: Elliott.Ross@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Solid Waste and Emergency Response ( SWER ) RIN: 2050-AG39

View Related Documents

Title: Management Standards for Hazardous Waste Pharmaceuticals

Abstract: A small portion of pharmaceuticals are regulated as hazardous waste under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act when they are disposed. Healthcare (and associated) facilities that generate hazardous waste pharmaceuticals have had a difficult time complying with the industry-oriented framework of the hazardous waste regulations for a number of reasons. First, healthcare workers are typically unfamiliar with the hazardous waste regulations as their primary focus is to provide healthcare to their patients; however, under the current regulatory scheme, healthcare workers are a major factor in the implementation of the regulations. Second, a healthcare facility can have thousands of items in its formulary and may find it difficult to ascertain which ones are hazardous wastes when disposed. Third, some pharmaceuticals are listed as acute hazardous wastes, which are stringently regulated even in small amounts. As a result, healthcare facilities are often required to comply with the most stringent aspects of the hazardous waste regulations. Due to these reasons, the Agency is concerned that the sewering of pharmaceuticals is a waste management option chosen by facilities in order to circumvent regulations that areincompatible with the operations and structure of healthcare (and associated) facilities. If not sewered, the Agency is concerned that hazardous waste pharmaceuticals are not being safely and properly transported and disposed. Lastly, a major mechanism used by healthcare facilities for the management of unused and/or expired pharmaceuticals, reverse distribution, is not recognized under the current regulatory scheme. Previously, the Agency proposed to address the pharmaceutical hazardous waste management issues by proposing to add them to the Universal Waste rule. Due to adverse comments on the 2008 Universal Waste proposal, EPA is considering re-proposing healthcare facility-specific regulations for the management of hazardous pharmaceutical wastes in order to provide a regulatory scheme that is more geared towards the unique issues that hospitals, pharmacies and other healthcare-related facilities face.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 260; 40 CFR 261; 40 CFR 262; 40 CFR 264; 40 CFR 265; 40 CFR 266; 40 CFR 268; 40 CFR 270 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 6912(a); 42 USC 6921; 42 USC 6922; 42 USC 6923; 42 USC 6924; 42 USC 6926; 42 USC 6927; 42 USC 6930; 42 USC 6937 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Action 00/00/0000

NPRM 12/02/2008 73 FR 73520

NPRM Extension of Comment Period 01/30/2009 74 FR 5633
Reproposal 02/00/2013

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM-http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2008/E8-28161.htm; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-RCRA-2007-0932. Includes Retrospective Review under EO 13563.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: Undetermined Energy Affected: Undetermined

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/wastes/hazard/wastetypes/universal/pharm.htm

Sectors Affected: 562112; 562211; 622; 623; 6212; 6213; 6211; 6219; 562219; 562119; 6214; 44611; 562111; 562213; 562212; 54194 Agency Contact: Lisa Lauer Environmental Protection Agency Solid Waste and Emergency Response
5304P Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703 308-7418
FAX: 703 308-0514
E-Mail: Lauer.Lisa@epa.gov Agency Contact: Jessica Young Environmental Protection Agency Solid Waste and Emergency Response
5304P Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703 308-0026
FAX: 703 308-0514
E-Mail: Young.Jessica@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Solid Waste and Emergency Response ( SWER ) RIN: 2050-AG56

View Related Documents

Title: Financial Responsibility Requirements Under CERCLA Section 108(b) for Facilities in the Chemical, Petroleum and

Electric Power Industries

Abstract: Section 108(b) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980, as amended, establishes certain authorities concerning financial responsibility requirements. The Agency has identified classes of facilities within the chemical manufacturing industry; the petroleum and coal products manufacturing industry, which primarily includes refineries and not coal mines; and the electric power generation, transmission, and distribution industry as those for which it plans to develop, as necessary, proposed financial responsibility requirements. EPA intends to include requirements for financial responsibility, as well as notification and implementation.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: Undetermined Unfunded Mandates: UndeterminedCFR Citation: Not Yet Determined (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 9601 et seq; 42 USC 9608 (b) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 00/00/0000

ANPRM 01/06/2010 75 FR 816

Extension of Comment Period 02/04/2010 75 FR 5715

Additional Information: EPA publication information: ANPRMhttp://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=0900006480a78958; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQSFUND-2009-0834

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Federal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: Undetermined Energy Affected: Undetermined

Sectors Affected: 325; 2211; 324 Agency Contact: Ben Lesser Environmental Protection Agency Solid Waste and Emergency Response
5302P Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703 308-0314
E-Mail: Lesser.Ben@epa.gov Agency Contact: Barbara Foster Environmental Protection Agency Solid Waste and Emergency Response
5304P Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703 308-7057
E-Mail: Foster.Barbara@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Solid Waste and Emergency Response ( SWER ) RIN: 2050-AG60

View Related Documents

Title: Hazardous Waste Management Systems: Identification and Listing of Hazardous Waste: Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Streams in Geological Sequestration Activities

Abstract: On July 25, 2008, EPA published a proposed rule under the Safe Drinking Water Act Underground Injection Control Program to create a new class of injection wells (Class VI) for geological sequestration (GS) of carbon dioxide (CO2). 73 FR 43492. In response to that proposal, EPA received numerous comments asking for clarification on how the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) hazardous waste requirements apply to CO2 streams. EPA published a proposed rule under RCRA, and is now considering a final rule that would conditionally exclude from the RCRA requirements CO2 streams that otherwise meet the definition of hazardous waste, in order to facilitate implementation of GS, while protecting human health

and the environment.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 260 to 261 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 6912; 42 USC 6921-29; 42 USC 6934 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 08/08/2011 76 FR 48073

Technical Correction Notice 09/08/2011 76 FR 55846

NPRM Comment Period End 10/07/2011

Final Action 02/00/2013

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM - http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=EPA-HQ-RCRA2010-0695-0001; EPA Docket information: EPA–HQ–RCRA–2010–0695

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: NoEnergy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/epawaste/nonhaz/industrial/geosequester/index.htm

Sectors Affected: 22; 48-49; 31-33; 211111 Agency Contact: Ross Elliott Environmental Protection Agency Solid Waste and Emergency Response
5304P Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703 308-8748
FAX: 703 308-0514
E-Mail: Elliott.Ross@epa.gov Agency Contact: Mark Baldwin Environmental Protection Agency Solid Waste and Emergency Response
5304P Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703 308-0157
E-Mail: Baldwin.Mark@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Solid Waste and Emergency Response ( SWER ) RIN: 2050-AG61

View Related Documents

Title: Financial Responsibility Requirements Under CERCLA Section 108(b) for Classes of Facilities in the Hard Rock Mining Industry

Abstract: Section 108(b) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980, as amended, establishes certain authorities concerning financial responsibility requirements. The Agency has identified classes of facilities within the Hard Rock mining industry as those for which financial responsibility requirements will be first developed. EPA intends to include requirements for financial responsibility, as well as notification and implementation.

Priority: Economically Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: Yes Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 9601 et seq; 42 USC 9608 (b) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Action 00/00/0000
Priority Notice 07/28/2009 74 FR 37213

NPRM 04/00/2013

Additional Information: EPA publication information: Priority Noticehttp://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=09000064809fc1ff; Split from RIN 2050-AG56. EPA
Docket information: EPA-HQ-SFUND-2009-0834

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Business Government Levels Affected: Federal

Federalism: Yes Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/superfund/policy/financialresponsibility/

Sectors Affected: 212; 331 Agency Contact: Ben Lesser Environmental Protection Agency Solid Waste and Emergency Response
5302P Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703 308-0314
E-Mail: Lesser.Ben@epa.gov Agency Contact: David Hockey Environmental Protection Agency Solid Waste and Emergency Response
5303P Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703 308-8846E-Mail: Hockey.David@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Solid Waste and Emergency Response ( SWER ) RIN: 2050-AD75

View Related Documents

Title: National Priorities List for Uncontrolled Hazardous Waste Sites: Proposed and Final Rules

Abstract: This action is being withdrawn from the Regulatory Agenda because it's a routine action that is not signed by the EPA Administrator. These rules will continue to be published approximately twice per year and can be found on the Superfund website at http:www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/npl/current.htm. EPA is only withdrawing the entry from being reported via the Semiannual Regulatory Agenda.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 300.425 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 9605 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final 20 03/06/1998 63 FR 11332

NPRM 24 03/06/1998 63 FR 11340

Final 21 07/28/1998 63 FR 40182

NPRM 25 07/28/1998 63 FR 40247

Final Tex-Tin 09/18/1998 63 FR 49855

Final 22 09/29/1998 63 FR 51848

NPRM 26 09/29/1998 63 FR 51882

Final 23 01/19/1999 64 FR 2942

NPRM 27 01/19/1999 64 FR 2950
NPRM Midnight Mine 02/16/1999 64 FR 7564

NPRM 28 04/23/1999 64 FR 19968

NPRM Almeda 05/10/1999 64 FR 24990

Final 24 05/10/1999 64 FR 24949

Final 25 07/22/1999 64 FR 39878

NPRM 29 07/22/1999 64 FR 39886

Final Pools Prairie 09/17/1999 64 FR 50459

NPRM 30 10/22/1999 64 FR 56992

Final Action 10/22/1999 64 FR 56966

Final 26 02/04/2000 65 FR 5435

NPRM 31 02/04/2000 65 FR 5468

Final 28 05/11/2000 65 FR 30482

NPRM 32 05/11/2000 65 FR 30489

Final 29 07/27/2000 65 FR 46096

NPRM 33 07/27/2000 65 FR 46131

NPRM Alabama/Malone 08/24/2000 65 FR 51567

Final 30 12/01/2000 65 FR 75179

NPRM 34 12/01/2000 65 FR 75215

NPRM 35 01/11/2001 66 FR 2380

Final 31 06/14/2001 66 FR 32235

NPRM 36 06/14/2001 66 FR 32287

Final 32 09/13/2001 66 FR 47583

NPRM 37 09/13/2001 66 FR 47612
NPRM Libby/Omaha 02/26/2002 67 FR 8836

Final adds 19 sites 09/05/2002 67 FR 56757

NPRM 38 09/05/2002 67 FR 56794

Final Action- 10/24/2002 67 FR 65315

Final Action-- 04/30/2003 68 FR 23077

NPRM 1 04/30/2003 68 FR 23094
Final 35 (adds 12 sites) 09/29/2003 68 FR 55875

NPRM 40 03/08/2004 69 FR 10646

Final 36 07/23/2004 69 FR 43755
NPRM-Vieques 08/13/2004 69 FR 50115

Final 37 09/23/2004 69 FR 56949

NPRM 41 09/23/2004 69 FR 56970
Final - Vieques 02/11/2005 70 FR 7184Final 38 04/27/2005 70 FR 21644

NPRM 42 04/27/2005 70 FR 21718

Final 39 09/14/2005 70 FR 54286

NPRM 43 09/14/2005 70 FR 54327

Final 40 04/19/2006 71 FR 20016

NPRM-44 04/19/2006 71 FR 20052

Final 41 09/27/2006 71 FR 56399

NPRM 45 09/27/2006 71 FR 56433

Final 42 03/07/2007 72 FR 10078

NPRM 46 03/07/2007 72 FR 10105

Final 43 09/19/2007 72 FR 53463

NPRM 47 09/19/2007 72 FR 53509

Final 44 03/19/2008 73 FR 14719

NPRM 48 03/19/2008 73 FR 14742

Final 45 09/03/2008 73 FR 51368

NPRM 49 09/03/2008 73 FR 51393

Final 46 04/09/2009 74 FR 16126

NPRM 50 04/09/2009 74 FR 16162

Final 47 09/23/2009 74 FR 48412

NPRM-Newtown Creek 09/23/2009 74 FR 48511

NPRM 51 09/23/2009 74 FR 48504

Final 48 11/04/2009 74 FR 57085

Final - Gowanus Canal 03/04/2010 75 FR 9790

Final 49 03/04/2010 75 FR 9782

NPRM-52 03/04/2010 75 FR 9843

Final 50 09/29/2010 75 FR 59975

Final-Newtown Creek 09/29/2010 75 FR 59983

NPRM-53 10/21/2010 75 FR 64976

Final 51 03/10/2011 76 FR 13113

NPRM 54 03/10/2011 76 FR 13089

Withdrawn 10/03/2011

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-SFUND-2011-XXXX

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State; Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/npl/current.htm Agency Contact: Terry Jeng Environmental Protection Agency Solid Waste and Emergency Response
5204P Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703 603-8852
E-Mail: Jeng.Terry@epa.gov Agency Contact: Doug Ammon Environmental Protection Agency Solid Waste and Emergency Response
5204P Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 347-8925
FAX: 703 603-9104
E-Mail: ammon.doug@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Solid Waste and Emergency Response ( SWER ) RIN: 2050-AE23

View Related Documents

Title: Revisions to the Comprehensive Guideline for Procurement of Products Containing Recovered Materials

Abstract: EPA is suspending this effort pending programmatic decisions and in light of current resource constraints. The timing of the Agency's future efforts are dependent on the availability of resources. EPA is directed to prepare procurement guidelines, as needed, that designate items that are or can be made with recovered materials and to issue recommendations for government procurement of these items. Once designated, procuring agencies are required to purchase these items with the highest percentage of recovered materials practicable. To date, EPA has designated 61 items under five Comprehensive Procurement Guidelines (CPGs). EPA has also issued a Recovered Materials Advisory Notice (RMAN) for each CPG that provides recommendations on buying the designated items. A CPG for Nylon Carpet was originally proposed in 2001. A Noticeof Data Availability was issued asking for additional information.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 247 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 6912(a) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM-CPG1 04/20/1994 59 FR 18892

Final CPG1 05/01/1995 60 FR 21370

NPRM CPG2 11/07/1996 61 FR 57748

Final CPG2 11/13/1997 62 FR 60962

NPRM-CPG3 08/26/1998 63 FR 45558

Final-CPG3-RMAN3 01/19/2000 65 FR 3069

NPRM CPG4 08/28/2001 66 FR 45256
NODA on Nylon Carpet 07/16/2003 68 FR 42040

NPRM-CPG5 12/10/2003 68 FR 68813

Final-CPG4-RMAN4 04/30/2004 69 FR 24028

Final CPG 5 09/14/2007 72 FR 52475

Withdrawn 08/22/2011

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-RCRA-2003-0013; EPA-HQ-RCRA-2001-0047

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; State; Local

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.epa.gov/cpg

Sectors Affected: 92111; 92119 Agency Contact: Marlene Reddoor Environmental Protection Agency Solid Waste and Emergency Response
5306P Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703 308-7276
FAX: 703 308-8686
E-Mail: reddoor.marlene@epa.gov Agency Contact: Elizabeth Resek Environmental Protection Agency Solid Waste and Emergency Response
5306P Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703 347-0391
FAX: 703 308-8686
E-Mail: resek.elizabeth@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Solid Waste and Emergency Response ( SWER ) RIN: 2050-AF03

View Related Documents

Title: Correction of Errors and Adjustment of CERCLA Reportable Quantities

Abstract: The Agency has decided to discontinue this effort at this time. Instead, EPA will issue specific technical corrections, as necessary, to correct errors, out of date requirements (i.e., phone numbers and other contact information) or other adjustments to clarify regulations.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 302 (revision) (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 9602 to 9603 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Withdrawn 08/18/2011Additional Information: SAN No. 4737

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No Agency Contact: Lynn Beasley Environmental Protection Agency Solid Waste and Emergency Response
5104A Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-1965
FAX: 202 564-2625
E-Mail: beasley.lynn@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Solid Waste and Emergency Response ( SWER ) RIN: 2050-AG22

View Related Documents

Title: National Contingency Plan Revisions to Align With the National Response Framework

Abstract: The Agency has decided to discontinue this effort at this time. As there are on-going adjustments being made to the National Response Framework (NRF), the EPA has decided to wait until the status of the NRF adjustments is complete. The Agency then intends to resume this effort.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 300 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 9601 et seq Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Withdrawn 08/18/2011

Additional Information: SAN No. 4971

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No Agency Contact: Lynn Beasley Environmental Protection Agency Solid Waste and Emergency Response
5104A Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-1965
FAX: 202 564-2625
E-Mail: beasley.lynn@epa.gov Agency Contact: Jean Schumann Environmental Protection Agency Solid Waste and Emergency Response
5104A Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-1977
FAX: 202 564-2620
E-Mail: schumann.jean@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Solid Waste and Emergency Response ( SWER ) RIN: 2050-AG65

View Related Documents

Title: Land Disposal Restrictions: Revision of the Treatment Standard for Carbamates

Abstract: The Environmental Protection Agency is considering revising the Land Disposal Restrictions (LDR) treatment standards for hazardous wastes from the production of carbamates and carbamate commercial chemical products that become hazardous wastes when they are discarded or intended to be discarded. There may be no analytical standards available withwhich to measure compliance with the LDR requirements. An analytical standard is a reference material with a known concentration of a target chemical that is used to calibrate analytical instruments in order to confirm detection and quantification of that chemical. Currently under the LDR program, most carbamate wastes must be treated to meet numeric concentration limits before the wastes can be land disposed. The lack of analytical standards makes it impossible to measure whether the numeric concentration limits have been met. Therefore, we are considering providing as an alternative standard the use of the best demonstrated available technologies for treating these wastes. This will provide significant treatment to minimize threats to human health and the environment while avoiding the problems that result from the lack of analytical standards to determine if the numeric concentration limits have been met. In addition, we are considering removing hazardous carbamate wastes from the table of Universal Treatment Standards at 40 CFR 268.48. By doing so, these wastes would not be classified as underlying hazardous constituents that require treatment to meet numeric concentration limits in wastes that display the characteristic of ignitability, reactivity, corrosivity or toxicity at the point of generation. This overall action would allow hazardous waste management facilities to certify that wastes have been treated in compliance with applicable LDR requirements. These facilities face potential curtailment of operations when they are unable to demonstrate waste and treatment residual content through analytical testing.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 268.40; 40 CFR 268.48 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 6924 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 06/13/2011 76 FR 34200

Direct Final Action 06/13/2011 76 FR 34147

NPRM Comment Period End 07/13/2011

Additional Information: EPA publication information: Direct Final Action - http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=EPAHQ-RCRA-2008-0332-0001; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-RCRA-2008-0332

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/wastes/index.htm Agency Contact: Mary Jackson Environmental Protection Agency Solid Waste and Emergency Response
5304P Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703 308-8453
E-Mail: Jackson.Mary@epa.gov Agency Contact: Frank Behan Environmental Protection Agency Solid Waste and Emergency Response
5304P Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703 308-8476
E-Mail: Behan.Frank@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AR12

View Related Documents

Title: Revised Regulation for Environmental Radiation Protection Standard for Nuclear Power Operations

Abstract: EPA's Office of Radiation Programs issued "Environmental Radiation Protection Standards for Nuclear Power Operations" in 1977. Since issuance of the standards, the understanding of radiation risk and dose to humans has advanced and new methodologies have been developed to calculate radiation doses. In view of the developments over the past decades, EPA is evaluating how to update the Environmental Radiation Protection Standards for Nuclear Power Operations in 40 CFR part 190. An updated rule would draw on updated science and clarify how safety should be demonstrated. EPA is issuing this ANPRM to solicit public input on general questions and approaches on what aspects of the rule should be updated.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: PreRule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 190 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: Atomic Energy Act, Reorg Plan 3Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

ANPRM 12/00/2011

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: NA at this time

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Federal; State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/radiation/ Agency Contact: Brian Littleton Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
6608J Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9216
E-Mail: littleton.brian@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Tom Peake Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
6608J Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9765
FAX: 202 343-2304
E-Mail: Peake.Tom@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AM08

View Related Documents

Title: New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) and Emissions Guidelines (EG) Review for Municipal Solid Waste Landfills
and Amendments to NSPS and EG

Abstract: This amendment is being issued to clarify what constitutes treated landfill gas, clarify responsibilities for compliance activities when multiple parties are involved in the ownership and operation of a landfill and the gas collection, control or treatment system, address fugitive emissions, and address emissions released prior to the current triggers for landfill gas collection. This action will also include a mandatory review of the New Source Performance Standards.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7411 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 09/08/2006 71 FR 53272
Supplemental NPRM 05/00/2012

Final Action 01/00/2013

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM - http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-AIR/2006/September/Day08/a7493.htm; NPRM was published 09/08/2006 (71 FR 53272) as RIN 2060-AJ41; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR2003-0215

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Local; Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 924110; 921; 562212

Related RINs: Previously Reported as 2060-AH13; Previously Reported as 2060-AJ41 Agency Contact: Hillary Ward Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
E143-01 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711Phone: 919 541-3154
E-Mail: ward.hillary@epa.gov Agency Contact: David Cozzie Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation 1200 Pennsylvania Ave, NW Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 919 541-5356
E-Mail: cozzie.david@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AN17

View Related Documents

Title: Standards of Performance for New Stationary Sources and Emission Guidelines for Existing Sources: Small Municipal Waste Combustors: Remand Response and Amendments

Abstract: This rule would amend the final (Dec. 2000) small municipal waste combustors (MWC) new source performance standards (NSPS) and emission guidelines (EG). The small MWC rule regulates owners and operators of small MWC, which are MWC units with capacities between 35 tons per day (tpd) and 250 tpd. This action will respond to the DC Circuit Court's remand of the small MWC standards, including assessment of the maximum achievable control technology (MACT) floors and all related analyses.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60 AAAA; 40 CFR 60 BBBB (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: CAA sec 111; CAA sec 129 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 04/00/2012

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2005-0514

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 92411; 562213 Agency Contact: Warren Johnson Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
D243-01 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5124
FAX: 919 541-5450
E-Mail: johnson.warren@epa.gov Agency Contact: David Cozzie Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation 1200 Pennsylvania Ave, NW Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 919 541-5356
E-Mail: cozzie.david@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AO17

View Related Documents

Title: Air Quality: Revision to Definition of Volatile Organic Compounds--Exclusion of a Group of Four Hydrofluoropolyethers (HFPEs)

Abstract: This NPRM will exclude a group of four hydrofluoropolyethers from the definition of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) on the basis that, as precursors, these chemical compounds make only a negligible contribution to the formation of tropospheric ozone. The chemical compounds to be excluded are a) HCF2OCF2H (known as HFE134), b) HCF2OCF2OCF2H (known as HFE-236cal2), c) HCF2OCF2CF2OCF2H (known as HFE-338pcc13), and d) HCF2OCF2OCF2CF2OCF2H (knownas H-Galden 1040X and also H-Galden ZT 130 (or 150 or 180)). We are also taking comment on issues concerning the chemical compounds’ toxicities, global warming potentials, and stratospheric ozone depletion potentials.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51.100(s) (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 52 USC 7602(s) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Action 00/00/0000

NPRM 02/00/2012

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0089

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Local; State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 325998; 336111; 238220; 326140; 326150 Agency Contact: Dave Sanders Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
C539-01 Research Triangle Park , NC 27525
Phone: 919 541-3356
FAX: 919 541-0824
E-Mail: sanders.dave@epa.gov Agency Contact: Tom Coda Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
C539-01 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-3037
E-Mail: coda.tom@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AO18

View Related Documents

Title: New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) and Emission Guidelines (EG) for Large Municipal Waste Combustors (MWCs).

Abstract: EPA originally adopted air emission standards for new and existing large municipal waste combustors (MWCs) in 1995. As required by section 129 of the Clean Air Act, EPA reviewed these standards and proposed revised standards. The proposal occurred on Dec 19, 2005, and final standards were published on May 10, 2006 (71 FR 27323). A number of individuals filed petitions on various aspects of the standards. Moreover, the Agency received a separate petition to reopen the section 129(a)(2) standards. EPA agreed to initiate such an action. Accordingly, EPA petitioned the court to remand the 2006 LMWC rule to EPA. The court issued the remand in February 2008.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: Clean Air Act sec 129 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Action 00/00/0000

Notice of Reconsideration of Final Rule 03/20/2007 72 FR 13016

NPRM 04/00/2012

Additional Information: EPA publication information: Notice of reconsideration of final rule - http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPAAIR/2007/March/Day-20/a5022.htm

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: NoSmall Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 92411; 562213 Agency Contact: Warren Johnson Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
D243-01 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5124
FAX: 919 541-5450
E-Mail: johnson.warren@epa.gov Agency Contact: Brian Shrager Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
D243-01 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-7689
FAX: 919 541-5450
E-Mail: shrager.brian@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AO66

View Related Documents

Title: Plywood and Composite Wood Products (PCWP) NESHAP -- Proposed & Final Amendments to Address "No Emission
Reduction" MACT Floors

Abstract: The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ordered EPA to re-evaluate the MACT floor for certain PCWP process unit groups. Among the issues to be addressed is MACT floors that had no emission reduction requirements. To meet these regulatory obligations in the face of changing industry practices (e.g., resin reformulation) whose emissions profilesand industry (e.g., MACT floor) impacts have not yet been determined, EPA intends to do the following: 1. Develop an industrywide survey for distribution late-2010 that focuses on the remand units, PCWP residual risk and technology review, resin reformulations and other process changes. 2. Identify technologies, emission limits and/or work practices 3. Assess risk / conduct technology review 4. Assess impacts and costs 5. Determine options and regulatory course of action (anticipated timing is for a proposal in late 2011 and final in 2012).

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: Undetermined Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: Clean Air Act sec 112 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Action 00/00/0000

NPRM 08/00/2012

Additional Information: SAN No. 5185

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 321999; 321213; 321211; 321219; 321212 Agency Contact: Bill Schrock Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
E143-03 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5432
FAX: 919 541-3470
E-Mail: schrock.bill@epa.gov Agency Contact: Robin Dunkins Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
E143-03 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5335
FAX: 919 541-3470Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP26

View Related Documents

Title: NESHAP Subpart W: Standards for Radon Emissions From Operating Uranium Mill Tailings: Review

Abstract: NESHAP subpart W protects human health and the environment by setting radon emission standards and work practices for operating uranium mill tailings impoundments. EPA is in the process of reviewing this standard. If necessary, the agency will revise the NESHAP requirements for radon emissions from operating uranium mill tailings.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 61.250 to 61.256 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Action 00/00/0000

NPRM 12/00/2011

Additional Information: SAN No. 5281

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No Agency Contact: Reid Rosnick Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
6608J Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9563
FAX: 202 343-2304
E-Mail: Rosnick.Reid@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Dan Schultheisz Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
6608J Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9349
FAX: 202 343-2304
E-Mail: schultheisz.daniel@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP34

View Related Documents

Title: NSPS Equipment Leaks (Subpart VV SOCMI and GGG Petroleum Refineries); Amendments

Abstract: On November 16, 2007 EPA published amendments to the new source performance standards for equipment leaks in 40 CFR Part 60, subparts VV, and GGG, and promulgated new subparts VVa and GGGa. After promulgation of the rule we received a petition for reconsideration from the American Chemistry Council (ACC), American Petroleum Institute (API), and National Petrochemical Refiners Association (NPRA), which we granted in part on March 4, 2008. This action will address those

reconsideration issues.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7411 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Action 00/00/0000NPRM 12/00/2011

Additional Information: Split from RIN 2060-AO90; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2006-0699

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 325110; 324110 Agency Contact: Jodi Howard Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
E143-01 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-4607
FAX: 919 541-0246
E-Mail: Howard.Jodi@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP41

View Related Documents

Title: In-Use Emissions Testing for Nonroad Diesel Engines and Amendments to General Compliance Provisions for Nonroad Engines

Abstract: This rulemaking will establish a manufacturer-run, in-use emissions testing program for 2013 and later model year non-road diesel engines used in non-road equipment. The new program will assess in-use gaseous and particulate exhaust emission rates from non-road diesel engines using portable emission measurement systems. Manufacturers will monitor compliance with the applicable not-to-exceed emission standards by typically testing engines during normal operation. If potentially non-complying engines are identified, the manufacturer will test more engines for the purpose of determining if any further action is necessary. EPA will likewise evaluate the in-use emissions data to make independent determinations about the possible need to pursue further testing or to initiate remedial actions. The in-use test data will not only be used by EPA to assure that emission standards are being met, but also by manufacturers to improve their engine designs. This program will address a serious, long-standing need for “real-world” in-use testing data to gauge the performance of engine emission
controls.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 80; 40 CFR 1033; 40 CFR 1042; 40 CFR 1045; 40 CFR 54; 40 CFR 1065 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 to 7671 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 04/00/2012

Final Action 04/00/2013

Additional Information: SAN No. 5318

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 336112 Agency Contact: Rich Wilcox Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
AAAQMC Ann Arbor , MI 48105
Phone: 734 214-4390
E-Mail: Wilcox.Rich@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Philip Carlson Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
AANC Ann Arbor , MI 48105
Phone: 734 214-4270
E-Mail: Carlson.Philip@epamail.epa.govEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP43

View Related Documents

Title: Revision of Health and Environmental Protection Standards for Uranium and Thorium Mill Tailings and Uranium In Situ Leaching Processing Facilities

Abstract: EPA's regulations in 40 CFR part 192 establish standards for the protection of public health, safety, and the environment from radiological and nonradiological hazards associated with uranium ore processing and disposal of resulting waste materials. These cross-media standards, which apply to pollutant emissions and site restoration, must be adopted by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, their Agreement States, and the Department of Energy. We propose to review the standards in the existing rule and to revise the regulations, taking into particular account the significant changes in uranium industry extraction technologies and their potential impacts to groundwater. New facilities proposed in states from Virginia to Alaska add to the importance of this effort.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 192 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 2022, 2114; Atomic Energy Act sec 275; UMTRCA sec 206(a) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Action 00/00/0000

NPRM 05/00/2012

Additional Information: SAN No. 5319

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Federal; State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 212291 Agency Contact: Andrea Cherepy Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
6608J Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9317
FAX: 202 343-2304
E-Mail: Cherepy.Andrea@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Tom Peake Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
6608J Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9765
FAX: 202 343-2304
E-Mail: Peake.Tom@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP63

View Related Documents

Title: Compliance Data Reporting Rule

Abstract: EPA published an advance notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPRM) in October 2009 seeking comment on proposed approaches to improving the emissions factors program. The agency sought comment on acquiring data for the development or improvement of the emissions factors; specifically, proposing to require the submission (via electronic reporting) of performance testing information already collected by industry by revising the reporting requirements in 40 CFR parts 60, 61, and 63 for a new source performance standard (NSPS) and national emissions standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP). Performance tests are conducted periodically to measure the air pollutant emissions from an industrial process and are used as an indicator of compliance with regulations. In addition to performance test data, this rulemaking will require the electronic submission of other selected compliance data, such as excess emissions reports, that are already being complied and submitted by industry to regulatory authorities. These data will be used for regulation development, control strategy development, rule effectiveness studies, risk analyses, and other air pollution control activities.Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60, 61, 63 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: Not Yet Determined Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Action 00/00/0000

ANPRM 10/14/2009 74 FR 52723
ANPRM; Extension of Public Comment Period 11/13/2009 74 FR 58574

NPRM 04/00/2012

Additional Information: EPA publication information: ANPRM - http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-AIR/2009/October/Day14/a24684.pdf

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: Undetermined

Sectors Affected: 11; 31-33; 21; 81; 42471; 22; 562 Agency Contact: Thomas Driscoll Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
D243-05 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5135
FAX: 919 541-1039
E-Mail: driscoll.tom@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Bob Schell Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
E-143-03 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-4116
FAX: 919 541-3207
E-Mail: schell.bob@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP71

View Related Documents

Title: Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) and Nonattainment New Source Review (NSR): Reasonable Possibility in Recordkeeping; Reconsideration

Abstract: The EPA is convening a proceeding for reconsideration of a final rule published in the Federal Register on December 21, 2007 (72 FR 62607). The subject rule was promulgated in response to a remand by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in New York v. EPA, 413 F.3d 3 (D.C. Cir. 2005), in order to clarify the "reasonable possibility" recordkeeping and reporting standard under the New Source Review (NSR) program. After review of issues raised by the State of New Jersey by petition and letter, we have decided to exercise our discretion to conduct a reconsideration of this final rule and will therefore be reopening the public comment period for the rule. The rule will remain in effect while our reconsideration proceeding is under way.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51 app S; 40 CFR 51.165; 40 CFR 51.166; 40 CFR 52.21 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7470 to 7515 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Action 00/00/0000

NPRM 06/00/2012

Additional Information: Split from RIN 2060-AN88; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2001-0004Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.epa.gov/nsr/

Sectors Affected: 32552; 325181; 325188; 325199; 325998; 336399; 324199; 331311; 336111; 325414; 325182; 221121; 221122; 325193; 32592; 221112; 221111; 32512; 325131; 336112; 325411; 336213; 336211; 33634; 33635; 2212; 211112; 322122; 221113; 221119; 32551; 322121; 32213; 32411; 325412; 4862; 32591; 3221; 32513; 325132; 336212 Agency Contact: David Painter Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
C504-03 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5515
FAX: 919 541-5509
E-Mail: painter.david@epa.gov Agency Contact: Raj Rao Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
C504-03 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5344
FAX: 919 541-5509
E-Mail: rao.raj@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP84

View Related Documents

Title: NESHAP Standard Standards for Petroleum Refineries--Heat Exchanger Reconsideration and Uniform Standards

Abstract: Organic chemical processing industries such as Petroleum Refining, Oil and Gas, and Chemical Production have similar emission sources that are often required to be controlled to similar levels by the same type of control devices and work practice standards. The air pollution control regulatory requirements for these sources have evolved and improved as different NSPS and MACT have been developed over the years. This has resulted in requirements that are different and in many cases insufficient especially with respect to ensuring continuous compliance. We have developed "standardized" regulatory requirements in the past but they are specific to part 60, 61, and 63 rules, respectively, and are out of date. This action will develop a state-of-the-art uniform standard for heat exchangers that will then become applicable when it is referenced in future regulatory actions, such as new and revised Control Technique Guidelines documents, NSPS technology reviews, and MACT Risk and Technology reviews. This effort will consist of developing the heat exchanger uniform standard, including developing control options to address technology review under both 112 and 111, addressing the control of VOC, HAP, and other pollutants, as appropriate, estimating the impacts of regulatory options, emission reductions, impacts on risk, costs, cost effectiveness, and economic impacts for these industries.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63 (revision) (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Action 00/00/0000

NPRM 01/06/2012 77 FR 960

NPRM Comment Period End 03/06/2012

Additional Information: Split from the following RINs: 2060-AP70, 2060-AO55 and 2060-AN85; EPA Docket information: EPAHQ-OAR-2003--0146

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 32411 Agency Contact: Brenda Shine Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
E143-01Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-3608
FAX: 919 541-0246
E-Mail: shine.brenda@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Penny Lassiter Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
E1430-01 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5396
FAX: 919 541-0246
E-Mail: lassiter.penny@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP89

View Related Documents

Title: Federal Reference Method for Lead in Total Suspended Particulate Matter

Abstract: On November 12, 2008, EPA substantially strengthened the national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for lead. EPA revised the level of the primary (health-based) standard from 1.5 micrograms per cubic meter (μg/m3) to 0.15μg/m3,, measured as total suspended particles (TSP) and revised the secondary (welfare-based) standard to be identical in all respects to the primary standard. In conjunction with strengthening the lead (Pb) NAAQS, EPA identified the need for States to improve existing lead monitoring networks. Depending on specific circumstances, States may have the option of using monitoring for either lead in TSP (Pb-TSP) or lead in PM10 (Pb-PM10) using approved Federal Reference Methods (FRMs) or Federal Equivalent Methods (FEMs) to meet monitoring requirements. To support new monitoring requirements, an FRM for Pb-PM10 was developed with the November 8, 2008 rulemaking. The FRM for Pb-TSP was left unchanged. The Pb-TSP FRM was promulgated in 1978. EPA recognizes that significant advances in measurement technology have been made since the promulgation of the original FRM. In order to support new monitoring requirements for Pb-TSP and update the FRM to improve it based on advanced measurement technology, a new FRM is being proposed as an updated option for States.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 50 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7403; 42 USC 7410; 42 USC 7601(a); 42 USC 7611; 42 USC 7618 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 10/00/2012

Additional Information: SAN No. 5388

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No Agency Contact: Joann Rice Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
C304-06 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-3372
FAX: 919 541-1903
E-Mail: Rice.Joann@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Lewis Weinstock Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
C304-06 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-3661
FAX: 919 541-1903
E-Mail: weinstock.lewis@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP93View Related Documents

Title: Revision of New Source Performance Standards for New Residential Wood Heaters

Abstract: EPA is revising the New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) for new residential wood heaters. This action is necessary because it updates the 1988 NSPS to reflect significant advancements in wood heater technologies and design, broaden the range of residential wood heating appliances covered by the regulation, and improve and streamline implementation procedures. This rule is expected to require manufacturers to redesign wood heaters to be cleaner and lower emitting. In general, the design changes would also make the heaters perform better and be more efficient. The revisions are also expected to retain the requirement for manufacturers to contract for testing of model lines by third-party independent laboratories, report the results to EPA, and label the models accordingly. New residential hydronic heaters and forced-air furnaces and new residential masonry heaters would also be regulated by this action. These standards would apply only to new residential wood heaters and not to existing residential wood heating appliances.

Priority: Economically Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: Yes Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: CAA sec 111(b)(1)(B) Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

Other Statutory 02/26/1996

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 07/00/2012

Final Action 07/00/2013

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0734

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Business Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State; Tribal

Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 333415; 333414; 238140 Agency Contact: Gil Wood Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
C404-05 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5272
FAX: 919 541-0242
E-Mail: wood.gil@epa.gov Agency Contact: David Cole Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
C404-05 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5565
FAX: 919 541-0242
E-Mail: cole.david@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP96

View Related Documents

Title: National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Startup, Shutdown, and Malfunction Amendments to Part 63
Standards

Abstract: This action will amend regulations in the General Provisions of regulations promulgated under the Clean Air Act (subpart A of part 63) that provide for or are related to an exemption from the requirement to comply with Clean Air Act section 112 emission standards during startup, shutdown, and malfunction (SSM) events. On December 19, 2008, in Sierra Club v. EPA, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit vacated the SSM. These General Provisions are not specific to any source category and apply when incorporated into source category-specific standards. In addition, other subparts with similar provisions will be amended so that applicable standards will no longer have exceptions for sources that report malfunction conditions, to reflect the court vacatur.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: NoCFR Citation: 40 CFR 63 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Action 00/00/0000

NPRM 03/00/2012

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 325; 334; 335; 332; 311; 337; 333; 424; 212; 339; 327; 211; 322; 324; 326; 331; 323; 313; 314; 336; 221;

321 Agency Contact: Matthew Witosky Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
D205-02 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-2865
E-Mail: witosky.matthew@epa.gov Agency Contact: Lisa Conner Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
D205-02 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5060
E-Mail: conner.lisa@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP97

View Related Documents

Title: National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Elemental Phosphorous Production

Abstract: Elemental phosphorous production includes mining, sizing and calcining phosphate ore, and then blending it with silica and coke before melting in a furnace under reduced conditions. The production processes emit hazardous air pollutants including radionuclides, selenium, mercury (Hg); and hydrogen cyanide (HCN). We have received petitions from States to develop a Maximum Available Control Technology (MACT) standard for this category. We plan to list this source category at proposal.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: Clean Air Act sec 112 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 03/00/2012

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No Agency Contact: Susan Fairchild Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
D-243-04 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5167
FAX: 919 541-3207
E-Mail: fairchild.susan@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Steve Fruh Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
D243-02 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-2837FAX: 919 541-4991
E-Mail: fruh.steve@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ01

View Related Documents

Title: Revisions to Test Methods and Testing Regulations

Abstract: This action will make needed corrections and updates to source testing methods and testing provisions in 40 CFR parts 60, 61, and 63. For example, Method 5, which determines particulate matter from stationary sources is being edited to remove silica gel as the prescribed drying agent. Silica gel has been listed as a potential carcinogen and other agents that are safer and more environmentally friendly are being prescribed. In Method 2, which determines stack gas velocity, a misplaced square root sign in one of the equations is being corrected. This is a periodic action that is done every several years to keep the rules up-to-date and to ensure that compliance testing and monitoring are done correctly.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51; 40 CFR 60; 40 CFR 61; 40 CFR 63 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 to 7601 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 01/09/2012 77 FR 1130

NPRM Comment Period End 03/09/2012

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0114

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 325188; 325199; 212299; 324122; 311812; 212393; 333618; 322121; 32411; 331312; 221320; 335911; 333611; 56221 Agency Contact: Foston Curtis Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
E143-02 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-1063
FAX: 919 541-0516
E-Mail: curtis.foston@epa.gov Agency Contact: Conniesue Oldham Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
E143-02 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-7774
FAX: 919 541-0516
E-Mail: oldham.conniesue@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ07

View Related Documents

Title: Withdr.of the Prior Deter. or Presump. That Compl. w/CAIR or the NOx SIP Call Const. RACT or RACM for the 97 8-Hr Ozone & 97Fine Part. NAAQS; & Rev. to RACT Guid. & RFP Req. for the 97Fine Part. NAAQS

Abstract: This rule will propose to withdraw any prior determination or presumption that compliance with the Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR) or the NOx SIP Call constitutes reasonably available control technology (RACT) or reasonably available control measures (RACM) for oxides of nitrogen (NOx) or sulfur dioxide (SO2) emissions from electric generating unit (EGU) sources participating in these regional cap-and-trade programs. This rule will propose revisions to preamble guidance in the final Implementation Rule for the 1997 PM2.5 national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS) concerning the economic feasibility criteria for determining RACT for sources located within nonattainment areas. The rule will also propose to clarify the situationsunder which emission reductions from outside of a nonattainment area can be credited toward meeting the Reasonable Further Progress (RFP) requirements for the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 23 USC 101; 42 USC 7401 to 7671q Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Action 00/00/0000

NPRM 03/00/2012

Additional Information: SAN No. 5411

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 221112 Agency Contact: Kristin Riha Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
C539-01 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-2031
FAX: 415 947-3583
E-Mail: riha.kristin@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Rich Damberg Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
C539-01 Research Triangle Park , NC 20460
Phone: 919 541-5592
FAX: 919 541-0824
E-Mail: damberg.rich@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ11

View Related Documents

Title: Risk and Technology Review for Ferroalloys Production

Abstract: This action is the Risk and Technology Review (RTR) for Ferroalloys Production. It will address both EPA's obligation under Clean Air Act (CAA) to conduct a residual risk review and to conduct a technology review. Under the "technology review" provision of CAA, EPA is required to review maximum achievable control technology (MACT) standards and to revise them “as necessary (taking into account developments in practices, processes and control technologies)” no less frequently than every 8 years. Under the "residual risk" provision of CAA, EPA must evaluate the MACT standards within 8 years after promulgation and promulgate standards if required to provide an ample margin of safety to protect public health or prevent an adverse
environmental effect.

Priority: Economically Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: Yes Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

NPRM Judicial 11/23/2011

Other Judicial 06/29/2012

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 12/00/2011

Final Action 07/00/2012Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0895

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 331112; 331419 Agency Contact: Conrad Chin Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
D243-02 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-1512
FAX: 919 541-3207
E-Mail: chin.conrad@epa.gov Agency Contact: Chuck French Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
Mail Code D243-02 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-7912
FAX: 919 541-3207
E-Mail: french.chuck@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ20

View Related Documents

Title: Residual Risk and Technology Review Amendments to the Phosphoric Acid and Phosphate Fertilizer Production
NESHAPs

Abstract: Phosphate rock is the primary raw material for phosphoric acid, which in turn is the raw material for phosphate fertilizer. These 2 rules are grouped together because their production processes are usually located at the same facility. Part 63 National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPs) for phosphoric acid and phosphate fertilizer (subparts AA and BB, respectively) were promulgated in June 1999. Facilities subject to these rules were required to be in compliance by June 2002. The Clean Air Act requires EPA to address the risk remaining to the public (i.e. a 'risk review') within 8 years after promulgation of the maximum achievable control technology (MACT) standards. We must also conduct a technology review of the source categories at a minimum of every 8 years to determine whether new technology exists to reduce emissions of hazardous air pollutants (HAP) below the levels established by the MACT standards. For purposes of expediency, these 2 reviews are combined together and called a risk and technology review, or RTR. The amendments will address both risk reduction and technology advancement for the phosphoric acid and phosphate fertilizer source categories. Settlement Agreement stipulates RTR on 2 Phosphate NESHAPs (Subparts AA and BB).

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: Clean Air Act sec 112 Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

NPRM Judicial 10/31/2012

Other Judicial 10/31/2013

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 10/00/2012

Final Action 10/00/2013

Additional Information: SAN No. 5435

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: Undetermined Agency Contact: Susan Fairchild Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
D-243-04 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5167FAX: 919 541-3207
E-Mail: fairchild.susan@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Steve Fruh Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
D243-02 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-2837
FAX: 919 541-4991
E-Mail: fruh.steve@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ29

View Related Documents

Title: Stationary Combustion Turbine NSPS Amendments to Address UARG Reconsideration Petition

Abstract: EPA is proposing to amend specific provisions in the new source performance standard (NSPS) for stationary combustion turbines to resolve issues and questions raised by the utility air regulatory group (UARG) on the original final rulemaking published on July 6, 2006 (71 FR 38482), and to address other technical and editorial issues that have been identified since promulgation. The primary issues raised in the petition include the NOx standard and the monitoring and reporting requirements for owners/operators that elect to install NOx CEMS. This proposed rule would also amend the location and wording of existing paragraphs to clarify the requirements of the NSPS. It would also exempt owners/operators of stationary combustion turbines that meet the applicability criteria of and that are complying with the SO2 standard in either subparts J or Ja (standards of performance for petroleum refineries) or only burn fuels containing inherently low amounts of sulfur from complying with the otherwise applicable SO2 limit in subpart KKKK. In addition, we are requesting comment on how to address combustion turbine engines that are overhauled or refurbished off site in such a manner that neither the owner, operator, or manufacturer can identify which components have been replaced and, therefore, cannot conduct the otherwise required reconstruction analysis. Also, in recognition that the ultra-low sulfur diesel requirements include Hawaii, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands we are intending and requesting comment on requiring owner/operators of turbines in these locations to the meet the same sulfur requirements as owner/operators of turbines located in State territories. Finally, we are proposing to require electronic reporting of performance tests.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: CAA 111 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 10/00/2012

Additional Information: Split from RIN 2060-AO23; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2004-0490

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State; Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 211111; 2211; 211112; 48621; 221 Agency Contact: Christian Fellner Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
D243-01 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-4003
FAX: 919 541-5450
E-Mail: fellner.christian@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Melanie King Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
D243-01 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-2469
E-Mail: king.melanie@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ40

View Related Documents

Title: Residual Risk and Technology Review Amendments to the Secondary Aluminum Production NESHAP

Abstract: A secondary aluminum production facility means any establishment using clean charge, aluminum scrap, or dross from aluminum production as the raw material for processing. The existing 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart RRR National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Secondary Aluminum Production facilities was promulgated in 2000. This rule regulates Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAP) from facilities that are major sources of HAP that operate aluminum scrap shredders, thermal chip dryers, scrap dryers/delacquering kilns/decoating kilns, group 2 furnaces, sweat furnaces, dross only furnaces, rotary dross coolers, and secondary aluminum processing units (SAPUs). SAPUs include group 1 furnaces and in-line fluxers. Area sources of HAP are regulated only with respect to emissions of dioxins/furans (D/F) from thermal chip dryers, scrap dryers/delacquering kilns/decoating kilns, sweat furnaces, and SAPUs. Facilities subject to these rules were required to be in compliance by March 2003. Section 112(f)(2) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) directs EPA to conduct risk assessments on each source category subject to maximum achievable control technology (MACT) standards and determine if additional standards are needed to reduce residual risks. The section 112(f)(2) residual risk review is to be done within 8 years after promulgation. Section 112(d)(6) of the CAA requires EPA to review and revise the MACT standards, as necessary, taking into account developments in practices, processes, and control technologies. The section 112(d)(6) technology review is to be done at least every 8 years. These risk and technology reviews for secondary aluminum production facilities will be conducted in this rulemaking, which will address possible residual risks, technology advancements, and clarifications to the existing rule.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: Undetermined Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412 Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

NPRM Judicial 01/30/2012

Other Judicial 10/30/2012

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 02/00/2012

Final Action 10/00/2012

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0544

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No Energy Affected: Undetermined Agency Contact: Rochelle Boyd Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
D-243-02 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-1390
FAX: 919 541-3207
E-Mail: boyd.rochelle@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Chuck French Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
Mail Code D243-02 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-7912
FAX: 919 541-3207
E-Mail: french.chuck@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ41

View Related Documents

Title: Risk and Technology Review for National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Pulp and Paper Industry

Abstract: Section 112(f)(2) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) directs EPA to conduct risk assessments on each source category subject to maximum achievable control technology (MACT) standards and to determine if additional standards are needed to reduce residual risks, to be completed 8 years after promulgation. Section 112(d)(6) of the CAA requires EPA to review andrevise the MACT standards as necessary, taking into account developments in practices, processes, and control technologies, to be done at least every 8 years. The National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for the Pulp and Paper Industry (subpart S) was promulgated in 1998 and also has not been reviewed. This action will propose those

amendments.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63.440 to 63.459 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: Clean Air Act sec 112 Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

NPRM Judicial Consent decree deadline completed 12/15/2011

Other Judicial Consent decree deadline 07/31/2012

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: The National Emission Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) in the Pulp and Paper Category was promulgated April 15, 1998 and codified as subpart S in 40 CFR parts 63.440 to 63.459. Section 112(f)(2) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) directs EPA to conduct risk assessments on each source category subject to maximum achievable control technology (MACT) standards, and to determine if additional standards are needed to reduce residual risks, to be completed 8 years after promulgation. Section 112(d)(6) of the CAA requires EPA to review and revise the MACT standards as necessary, taking into account developments in practices, processes and control technologies, to be done at least every 8 years.

Legal Basis: EPA has signed a consent agreement that directs it to propose a Risk and Technology Review rule (RTR) to address the requirements of Sections 112 (f)(2) and (d)(6) by December 15, 2011 and promulgate a final RTR rule for this category by July 31, 2012.

Alternatives: Not yet determined.

Costs and Benefits: Not yet determined.

Risks: Not yet determined.

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 12/27/2011 76 FR 81328

Final Action 08/00/2012

Additional Information: Docket number EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Local; State; Tribal

Federalism: No Energy Affected: Undetermined Agency Contact: Bill Schrock Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
E143-03 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5432
FAX: 919 541-3470
E-Mail: schrock.bill@epa.gov Agency Contact: Robin Dunkins Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
E143-03 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5335
FAX: 919 541-3470

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ47

View Related Documents

Title: Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) and Nonattainment New Source Review (NSR): Reconsideration of Inclusion of Fugitive Emissions; Reconsideration

Abstract: EPA is proposing a rule based on the results of its reconsideration of the final rule titled, “Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) and Nonattainment New Source Review (NSR): Reconsideration of Inclusion of Fugitive Emissions”(Fugitive Emissions Rule), published on December 19, 2008. Through a letter signed on April 24, 2009, EPA granted reconsideration on a petition submitted by National Resources Defense Council (NRDC), as well as an administrative stay of the Fugitive Emissions Rule provisions. In subsequent actions, EPA extended the stay to provide enough time to propose, take public comment on, and issue a final action pursuant to the reconsideration of the Fugitive Emissions Rule. In this action EPA will consider the petition for reconsideration, public comments, and information contained in the rulemaking docket to reach a
decision on the reconsideration and finalize the rule.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51 to 52 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7470 to 7515 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Action 00/00/0000

NPRM 12/01/2011 76 FR 74854

NPRM Comment Period End 01/30/2012

Additional Information: Split from RIN 2060-AM91; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2004-0014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.epa.gov/nsr

Sectors Affected: 32552; 325181; 325188; 325199; 325998; 336399; 324199; 331311; 336111; 325414; 325182; 221121; 221122; 325193; 32592; 221112; 221111; 32512; 325131; 336112; 325411; 336213; 336211; 33634; 33635; 2212; 211112; 322122; 221113; 221119; 32551; 322121; 32213; 32411; 325412; 4862; 32591; 3221; 32513; 325132; 336212 Agency Contact: Peter Keller Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
C504--03 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5339
FAX: 919 541-5509
E-Mail: keller.peter@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Raj Rao Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
C504-03 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5344
FAX: 919 541-5509
E-Mail: rao.raj@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ54

View Related Documents

Title: Joint Rulemaking To Establish 2017 and Later Model Year Light Duty Vehicle GHG Emissions and CAFE Standards

Abstract: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), on behalf of the Department of Transportation, have proposed a joint rulemaking on GHG and CAFE standards for model years 2017 to 2025 light-duty vehicles. This action represents a continuation of a coordinated National Program under the Clean Air Act (CAA) and the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (EPCA), as amended by the Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA), to improve fuel efficiency and to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of light-duty vehicles. On July 29, 2011, President Obama announced a historic agreement with 13 automakers and the State of California to pursue 2017 to 2025 standards. This announcement was accompanied by a joint Supplemental Notice of Intent, issued by EPA and NHTSA, which outlined the standards and other key program elements the agencies intend to propose in the upcoming rulemaking. EPA and NHTSA intend to propose that automobile manufacturers meet a model year 2025 CO2 standard of 163 grams/mile, which is equivalent to 54.5 miles per gallon if the standard were achieved with fuel economy technologies alone. This latest notice followed a September 30, 2010, joint Notice of Intent that provided an initial assessment of potential levels of stringency for 2017 to 2025 standards, an Interim Joint Technical Assessment Report published jointly by EPA, NHTSA, and the California Resources Board in September 2010, and a November 30, 2010, Supplemental Notice summarizing key stakeholder comments.

Priority: Economically Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: Yes Unfunded Mandates: Private SectorCFR Citation: 40 CFR 86 and 600 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 to 7671q Legal Deadline: None

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: EPA has found that emissions of greenhouse gases (GHGs) from new motor vehicles cause or contribute to pollution that may reasonably be anticipated to endanger public health and welfare. Light-duty vehicles emit four GHGs— carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (NOX), and hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs)–and are responsible for nearly 60 percent of all mobile-source GHGs. On May 21, 2010, the President called on the EPA and NHTSA, in close coordination with California, to begin the next phase of the National Clean Car Program and propose new standards for model years 2017 to 2025, in response to the urgent and closely intertwined challenges faced by our Nation of dependence on oil, energy security, and global climate change. This rulemaking would provide significant additional reductions in GHGs from future light-duty vehicles and fuel efficiency improvements.

Legal Basis: The Clean Air Act section 202(a)(1) states that "The Administrator shall by regulation prescribe (and from time to time revise) in accordance with the provisions of this section, standards applicable to the emissions of any air pollutant from any class or classes of new motor vehicles or new motor vehicle engines, which in his judgment cause, or contribute to, air pollution, which may reasonably be anticipated to endanger public health or welfare." Section 202(a) covers light-duty vehicles. In April 2007, the Supreme Court found in Massachusetts v. EPA that greenhouse gases fit well within the Act's capacious definition of "air pollutant" and that EPA has statutory authority to regulate emission of such gases from new motor vehicles. Lastly, in December 2009, EPA published two findings (74 FR 66496) that emissions of GHGs from new motor vehicles and motor vehicle engines contribute to air pollution, and that the air pollution may reasonably be anticipated to endanger public
health and welfare.

Alternatives: The rulemaking proposal includes an evaluation of regulatory alternatives that can be considered in addition to the Agency's primary proposal. In addition, the proposal includes tools such as averaging, banking, and trading of emissions credits and other flexibilities for alternative approaches for compliance with the proposed program.

Costs and Benefits: The standards under consideration are projected to reduce GHGs by approximately 2 billion metric tons and save 4 billion barrels of oil over the lifetime of MY 2017 to 2025 vehicles. These standards would have significant benefits to American consumers by reducing the costs they would pay to fuel these more efficient vehicles.

Risks: The failure to set new GHG standards for light-duty vehicles would increase the risk of unacceptable climate change impacts.

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Notice of Intent 10/13/2010 75 FR 62739
Supplemental Notice of Intent 12/08/2010 75 FR 76337
2nd Supplemental Notice of Intent 08/09/2011 76 FR 48758

NPRM 12/01/2011 76 FR 74854

Final Action 08/00/2012

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0799

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: Yes Energy Affected: No International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise be of
international interest.

Sectors Affected: 811198; 336111; 423110; 811112; 811111; 441120 Related Agencies: Joint : NHTSA Agency Contact: Robin Moran Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation

NVFEL Ann Arbor , MI 48105
Phone: 734 214-4781
FAX: 734 214-4816
E-Mail: moran.robin@epa.gov Agency Contact: Chris Lieske Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

NVFEL Ann Arbor , MI 48105
Phone: 734 214-4584
FAX: 734 214-4816
E-Mail: lieske.christopher@epa.govEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ55

View Related Documents

Title: Amendments to Delegation of Authority Provisions in the Prevention of Significant Deterioration Program

Abstract: This amendment will be a policy update of a rule from several decades ago. It will amend the part 52 Approval and Promulgation of State Implementation Plans, 1977 Clean Air Act Amendments to Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) 52.21(u) Delegation of Authority. This rule will delete a section that restricts tribes from taking delegation of the PSD program. It will add tribes to paragraph 2 along with states and local air pollution control agencies. These changes are intended to ensure that tribes are treated the same as states and locals and to enable direct delegation of New Source Review to tribes. This rule will also update paragraph numbering and an erroneous cross reference to be consistent with the current program.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 42 CFR 52.21(u) (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 12/30/2011 76 FR 82234

NPRM Comment Period End 02/28/2012

Final Action 04/00/2012

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0943

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 924110; 33311; 23899; 3116; 3323; 324121; 811121; 3251; 72112; 323110; 212321; 211111; 22111; 4471; 42451; 331511; 332812; 32191; 221210; 211112; 21111; 311119; 3329; 3279; 42471; 32711; 32732; 321113; 22132; 321212; 562212; 33711 Agency Contact: Regina Chappell Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
C304-03 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-3650
FAX: 919 541-0942
E-Mail: chappell.regina@epa.gov Agency Contact: Laura McKelvey Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
C304-03 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5497
FAX: 919 541-0942
E-Mail: mckelvey.laura@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ58

View Related Documents

Title: Reconsideration of Final National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines

Abstract: On March 3, 2010, EPA issued a final rule establishing standards for emissions of hazardous air pollutants (HAP) from existing stationary diesel engines located at major and area sources. The final rule revised the requirements for emergency stationary engines to allow operation for up to 15 hours per year in emergency demand response, if needed to maintain stability in the grid, as determined by the regional transmission organization. EPA has received two petitions to reconsider this decision to allow 15 hours of operation for emergency demand response for emergency stationary engines. On December 7, 2010, EPA issued a Federal Register notice announcing our decision to grant reconsideration and soliciting information and public comments on the emergency demand response issue. This proposal will amend the final rule to address the issues raised in the petitions for reconsideration. EPA also received a petition to reconsider the standards for emissions of HAP from existing stationary spark ignition engines located at major and area sources, which were finalized on August 20, 2010. In response tothe petition, EPA is reconsidering the use of formaldehyde as a surrogate for HAP for four-stroke rich burn engines. This action will propose amendments to the final rule to address the issue raised in the petition.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: Undetermined Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412(d) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Notice of Reconsideration 12/07/2010 75 FR 75937
Notice of Public Meeting 12/23/2010 75 FR 80761

NPRM 12/00/2011

Additional Information: EPA publication information: Notice of Reconsideration - http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0708-0642; Split from RIN 2060-AP36. Judicial comments:Consent decree for NESHAP for non-emergency stationary diesel engines 300 HP or greater; EPA Docket information: EPAHQ-OAR-2008-0708

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: Undetermined Energy Affected: Undetermined

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/atw/rice/ricepg.html Agency Contact: Melanie King Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
D243-01 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-2469
E-Mail: king.melanie@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Robert Wayland Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
D243-01 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-1045
FAX: 919 541-5450
E-Mail: Wayland.RobertJ@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ60

View Related Documents

Title: National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Hard and Decorative Chromium Electroplating, Chromium Anodizing, and Steel Pickling Residual Risk and Technology Review

Abstract: EPA received additional information after proposal which indicated the possibility of proposing a lower emission limit. This supplemental action would propose those limits for six industrial source categories regulated by two National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP): Steel Pickling and Chromium Electroplating.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: CAA sec 112(f)(2); CAA sec 112(d)(6) Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

Other Judicial Supplemental Proposal, promised 01/20/2012 01/20/2012

Other Judicial Consent decree for final action 08/15/2012

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite
Supplemental NPRM 01/00/2012

Final Action 08/00/2012Additional Information: Split from RIN 2060-AO92. Split from RIN 2060-AN85.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 3364; 3313; 32731; 3314; 32411; 331492; 22132 Agency Contact: Phil Mulrine Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
D243-02 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5289
FAX: 919 541-3207
E-Mail: mulrine.phil@epa.gov Agency Contact: Steve Fruh Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
D243-02 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-2837
FAX: 919 541-4991
E-Mail: fruh.steve@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ70

View Related Documents

Title: Re-Proposal of Confidentiality Determinations for Eight Subparts Under the Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gases

Rule

Abstract: This action re-proposes the Confidential Business Information (CBI) determinations for certain source categories in the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program that were finalized in the fall of 2010. A proposed determination regarding whether the data reporting elements would be made available to the public or be entitled to confidential treatment was originally proposed in July 2010 (75 FR 39094, July 7, 2010). For a limited number of source categories, these proposed determinations were based on proposed rules that had not yet been finalized. Because these source categories have now been finalized, and because the data reporting elements have changed significantly since proposal, EPA is re-proposing the confidentiality determinations for these source categories.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 98 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 12/00/2011

Final Action 07/00/2012

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-0028

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Federal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/emissions/ghgrulemaking.html

Sectors Affected: 333415; 211111; 221121; 423610; 33531; 423620; 334111; 443111; 336391; 221210; 211112; 334419; 486210; 334413; 335313; 326150; 423730 Agency Contact: Barbora Master Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
6207J Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9899
FAX: 202 343-2359
E-Mail: master.barbora@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: David Jacobson Environmental Protection AgencyAir and Radiation
6207J Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9419
FAX: 202 343-2359
E-Mail: jacobson.david@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ71

View Related Documents

Title: Correction to Insert Credible Evidence Language Missing From the Compliance Certification Provisions for Operating Permits Programs

Abstract: This NPRM with direct final will amend the compliance certification provisions to restore a sentence removed by error in a previous amendment. The June 27, 2003, final rule that amended the Compliance Certification Requirements language inadvertently omitted a sentence. If no adverse comments on the NPRM, the final will become effective.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 70.6(c)(5)(iii)(B); 40 CFR 71.6(c)(5)( (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Direct Final Action 05/00/2012

NPRM 05/00/2012

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; State; Local; Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No Agency Contact: Grecia Castro Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
C504-05 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-1351
FAX: 919 541-5509
E-Mail: castro.grecia@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Juan Santiago Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
C504-05 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-1084
FAX: 919-541-5509
E-Mail: santiago.juan@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ75

View Related Documents

Title: Petroleum Refinery Sector Risk and Technology Review and NSPS

Abstract: This action is the Petroleum Refining Sector Rulemaking, which will address our obligation to perform Risk and Technology Reviews (RTR) for Petroleum Refinery MACT 1 and 2 source categories and will address issues related to the reconsideration of Petroleum Refinery New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) subpart Ja. EPA entered into a settlement agreement with multiple litigants on December 23, 2010. The settlement agreement requires EPA to propose standards of performance for GHGs for affected facilities at refineries that are subject to NSPS subparts J and Ja (Petroleum Refineries, including flares, process heaters, fluid catalytic cracking units, fluid cokers, delayed cokers, and sulfur recovery plants), subpart Db (Industrial-Commercial-Institutional Steam Generating Units [Boilers]), subpart Dc (Small Industrial-Commercial-Institutional Steam Generating Units), subpart GGG (Equipment Leaks of VOC in Petroleum Refineries; e.g., leaking equipment components such as pumps, valves, flanges), and subpart QQQ (VOC Emissions from Petroleum Refinery Wastewater Systems; e.g., drainsystems and oil water separators) and to propose emissions guidelines for GHGs from existing affected facilities at refineries in the source categories covered by those NSPS subparts. The settlement also requires EPA to propose to address remaining issues raised in a petition filed in response to the June 24, 2008, promulgation of amendments to the Refinery NSPS subpart J and new standards of performance for subpart Ja, and to propose standards, as necessary, to address the RTR review for the 2002 Refinery MACT II standards. The settlement requires EPA to issue final standards for the NSPS and RTR reviews by November 10, 2012. This settlement agreement is currently under negotiation. In this action, we will also conduct RTR reviews for the two Petroleum Refinery MACT. We will use information obtained through a comprehensive information collection process to address The MACT and NSPS reviews. Uniform standards (for heat exchangers, equipment leaks, storage vessels and transfer operations; control devices and closed-vent systems) are being developed in separate actions and will specify work practices, equipment standards, and monitoring, recordkeeping, and reporting requirements. The refinery sector MACT and NSPS are expected to reference the uniform standards. Later, chemical sector MACT and NSPS will also reference the uniform standards, which will ensure that requirements are consistent, to the extent appropriate, across the chemical sectors.

Priority: Economically Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: Yes Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60 and 63 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: Clean Air Act secs 111 and 112 Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

NPRM Judicial Settlement Agreement 12/10/2011

Other Judicial Settlement Agreement 11/10/2012

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: Under the "technology review" provision of CAA section 112, EPA is required to review maximum achievable control technology (MACT) standards and to revise them "as necessary (taking into account developments in practices, processes, and control technologies)" no less frequently than every 8 years. Under the "residual risk" provision of CAA section 112, EPA must evaluate the MACT standards within 8 years after promulgation and promulgate standards if required to provide an ample margin of safety to protect public health or prevent an adverse environmental effect. Section 111(b)(1)(B) of the CAA mandates that EPA review and, if appropriate, revise existing NSPS every 8 years.

Legal Basis: CAA sections 111 and 112.

Alternatives: Not yet determined.

Costs and Benefits: EPA is currently assessing the costs and benefits associated with this action.

Risks: EPA is currently assessing risks for this action.

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 12/00/2011

Final Action 12/00/2012

Additional Information: Action described in RIN 2060-AQ28 (NSPS reconsideration issues) will be included in this action. EPA
Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0682

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/atw/petrefine/petrefpg.html

Sectors Affected: 32411 Agency Contact: Brenda Shine Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
E143-01 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-3608
FAX: 919 541-0246
E-Mail: shine.brenda@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Penny Lassiter Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
E1430-01 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5396
FAX: 919 541-0246
E-Mail: lassiter.penny@epamail.epa.govEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ81

View Related Documents

Title: Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program: Part 98 Amendments to Address Input to Emission Equation Issues

Abstract: This action concerns Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program data reporting elements used as inputs to emission equations for direct emitters. If deemed necessary, the proposal may suggest amendments to part 98 calculation methodologies or verification approaches to prevent public disclosure of data in this category whose disclosure is likely to cause substantial competitive harm. Any final amendments to part 98 would address comments received on the proposal as well as relevant comments received in response to the December 27, 2010, call for information on data elements used as inputs to emission equations.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 98 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM Call for Information 12/27/2010 75 FR 81366

NPRM 09/00/2012

Final Action 09/00/2013

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/emissions/ghgrulemaking.html Agency Contact: Barbora Master Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
6207J Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9899
FAX: 202 343-2359
E-Mail: master.barbora@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Jessica Gordon Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
6207J Washington , DC 20016
Phone: 202 343-9444
E-Mail: gordon.jessica@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ84

View Related Documents

Title: Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Listing of Substitutes for Ozone-Depleting Substances--Fire Protection

Abstract: This direct final action would list as acceptable (subject to use restrictions) a substitute for ozone-depleting substances in the fire suppression and explosion protection sector under EPA's Significant New Alternatives Policy (SNAP) Program. The SNAP Program evaluates substitutes for ozone-depleting substances and publishes lists of acceptable and unacceptable substitutes. The intended effect of the SNAP Program is to support the transition away from ozone-depleting substances through review of substitutes and their effects on human health and the environment.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 82 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7414, 7601, 7671 to 7671(q) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:Action Date FR Cite

Direct Final Action 01/00/2012

NPRM 01/00/2012

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-0111

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/ozone/snap/fire/

Sectors Affected: 336411; 325998; 33611; 238210; 33612; 236210; 332919; 33699 Agency Contact: Bella Maranion Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
6205J Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9749
FAX: 202 343-2363
E-Mail: Maranion.Bella@epa.gov Agency Contact: Cindy Newberg Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
6205J Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9729
FAX: 202 343-2363
E-Mail: Newberg.Cindy@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ86

View Related Documents

Title: Control of Air Pollution From Motor Vehicles: Tier 3 Motor Vehicle Emission and Fuel Standards

Abstract: This rule will establish new standards for light-duty vehicles and their fuels in order to reduce emissions of criteria and toxic pollutants and their impact on air quality and health. This action will set forth a comprehensive approach toward regulating motor vehicles for non-greenhouse gas pollutants, as requested by a May 2010 Presidential memorandum.

Priority: Economically Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: Yes Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: CAA 202(a) and 211(v) Legal Deadline: None

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: States are working to attain National Ambient Air Quality Standards for ozone, PM, and NOx. Light-duty vehicles are responsible for a significant portion of the precursors to these pollutants and are large contributors to ambient air toxic pollution. For example, without future controls, by 2014 light-duty vehicles are projected to contribute 25 percent of nationwide mobile-source NOx, 40 percent of nationwide mobile-source VOC, and 10 percent nationwide mobile-source PM. Importantly, by 2020 mobile sources are expected to be as much as 50 percent of the inventories for some individual urban areas without future controls. Light-duty vehicles also contribute about half of the 2030 mobile source inventory of toxics; the 2002 National-Scale Air Toxics Assessment showed that mobile sources were responsible for over 50 percent of cancer risk and over 80 percent of noncancer hazard. Clearly, there is a need for tighter light-duty vehicle standards and fuel standards as part of a comprehensive approach to reducing pollution from motor vehicles. Renewable fuels are recognized to pose potential air quality concerns, and EPA has a mandate to address them under Clean Air Act section 211(q) and 211(v). Specifically, both EPAct of 2005 and EISA (2007) amended the CAA to require EPA to determine adverse air quality impacts of renewable fuels and to implement appropriate measures to mitigate these impacts to the greatest extent achievable.

Legal Basis: The Clean Air Act, section 202(a)(1), states "The Administrator shall by regulation prescribe (and from time to time revise) in accordance with the provisions of this section, standards applicable to the emission of any air pollutant from any class, or class of new motor vehicles or new motor vehicle engines, which in his judgment cause, or contribute to, air pollution which may be reasonably be anticipated to endanger public health or welfare." Section 202(a) covers all on-highway vehicles, including medium and heavy-duty trucks. EPA is also using its authority under section 211(c) of the Clean Air Act to address gasoline sulfur controls, section 211(h) to address Reid Vapor Pressure, and section 211(v), which requires that the Administrator promulgate fuel regulations to implement appropriate measures to mitigate, to the greatest extent achievable, and considering the results of the anti-backsliding study completed under section 211(v) (1), any adverse impacts on air quality as a results of the renewable volumes or make a determination that no such measures are necessary.Alternatives: The rulemaking proposal will include an evaluation of regulatory alternatives that can be considered in addition to the Agency's primary proposal.

Costs and Benefits: Detailed analysis of economy-wide cost impacts, emissions reductions, and societal benefits will be performed during the rulemaking process.

Risks: The failure to set new Tier 3 vehicle/fuel standards will adversely impact the population living in nonattainment areas, where reductions from the Tier 3 rule are needed to help attain and maintain the ozone and PM NAAQS (and to mitigate adverse effects of renewable fuels). Also, without the new Tier 3 vehicle/fuel standards, the sizeable population living, working, and going to school near roads will continue to be exposed to higher levels of air toxics, which is a current environmental justice and children's health concern.

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 03/00/2012

Final Action 10/00/2012

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-0135. Includes Retrospective Review under E.O. 13563.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 811198; 336111; 811112; 336311; 336312; 336120; 336112; 454312; 541690; 324110; 484220; 484230 Agency Contact: Catherine Yanca Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
NVFEL S87 Ann Arbor , MI 48105
Phone: 734 214-4769
E-Mail: Yanca.Catherine@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Kathryn Sargeant Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
NVFEL S77 Ann Arbor , MI 48105
Phone: 734 214-4441
E-Mail: Sargeant.Kathryn@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ89

View Related Documents

Title: Reconsideration of Chemical Manufacturing Area Sources National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants;

Amendments

Abstract: The NESHAP for Chemical Manufacturing Area Sources was promulgated on October 29, 2009. The standards included requirements for nine source categories in one subpart. On February 12, 2010, EPA received a petition for reconsideration from the American Chemistry Council and the Society of Chemical Manufacturers & Affiliates. The petitioners requested that EPA republish six aspects of the final rule because the requirements were not described in, nor were logical outgrowth of, the proposed rule. The six provisions are: (1) Title V permits are required for sources that installed controls after 1990 to become area sources (the source categories were exempt from title V in proposal) ; (2) the requirement that sources with equipment subject to the final rule and another rule comply with either each provision independently or with the most stringent requirements of each rule; (3) the requirement that leak inspections include direct and proximate inspection of all areas of potential leak within the chemical manufacturing process unit (CMPU); (4) the requirement that process vessels in HAP service be equipped with a cover or lid that must be in place at all times when the vessel contains HAP, except for material addition and sampling; (5) the requirement to conduct leak inspections only during those periods when equipment is in HAP service; and (6) the broad definition of "family of materials" in determining applicability of CMPUs. On June 15, 2010, EPA granted reconsideration and in this supplemental proposal EPA will request comment on the six provisions.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: Clean Air Act sec 112 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR CiteInterim Final--Stay 12/14/2010 75 FR 77760
NPRM--Stay 12/14/2010 75 FR 77799
Final Action--Stay 03/14/2011 76 FR 13514

NPRM--Reconsideration 12/00/2011

Final Action--Reconsideration 09/00/2012

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM - Stay - http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail; EPA Docket
information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0334

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No Agency Contact: Nick Parsons Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
E143-01 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5372
FAX: 919 541-0246
E-Mail: parsons.nick@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Penny Lassiter Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
E1430-01 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5396
FAX: 919 541-0246
E-Mail: lassiter.penny@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ90

View Related Documents

Title: National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) Risk and Technology Review (RTR) for the Mineral Wool and Wool Fiberglass Industries

Abstract: The Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) standard for Mineral Wool Production was promulgated on June 1, 1999, and the MACT for Wool Fiberglass Production was promulgated on June 14, 1999. The Clean Air Act requires EPA to evaluate the risk remaining to human health within eight years of promulgation of each MACT standard. Along with risk, the EPA is also required to review new technology in the industry that can reduce hazardous air pollutant (HAP) emissions from regulated sources in the industry, and may consider costs under this technology review. EPA is addressing these Clean Air Act requirements under a combined risk and technology review (RTR).

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63 1175 to 1196; 40 CFR 63 1380 to 1399 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

NPRM Judicial 11/04/2011

Other Judicial 10/31/2012

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 11/25/2011 76 FR 72770

NPRM Comment Period End 01/24/2012

Final Action 07/00/2012

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: MINERAL WOOL: EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1041 WOOL FIBERGLASS: EPAHQ-OAR-2010-1042

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Business Government Levels Affected: No

Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN InformationURL: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/atw/rrisk/rtrpg.html

Sectors Affected: 327993 Agency Contact: Susan Fairchild Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
D-243-04 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5167
FAX: 919 541-3207
E-Mail: fairchild.susan@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Keith Barnett Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation 1200 Pennsylvania Ave Research Triangle Park , NC 20460
Phone: 919 541-5605
FAX: 919 541-3720
E-Mail: barnett.keith@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ91

View Related Documents

Title: Greenhouse Gas New Source Performance Standard for Electric Generating Units for New Sources

Abstract: This action will amend the electric generating units (EGUs) New Source Performance Standard and add a section 111(b) greenhouse gas (GHG) standard for new and modified facilities.

Priority: Economically Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: Undetermined Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: CAA 111 Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

NPRM Judicial 09/30/2011

Other Judicial 05/25/2012

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: EPA entered into settlement agreement with multiple State and environmental petitioners on December 21, 2010, to establish standards of performance for GHGs for new EGUs and emissions guidelines for GHGs from existing
EGUs.

Legal Basis: Clean Air Act, section 111

Alternatives: Not yet determined.

Costs and Benefits: Not yet determined.

Risks: Not yet determined.

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 01/00/2012

Final Action 06/00/2012

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAP-2011-0660

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: Undetermined Energy Affected: Yes

Sectors Affected: 221 Agency Contact: Christian Fellner Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
D243-01 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-4003
FAX: 919 541-5450E-Mail: fellner.christian@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Brian Shrager Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
D243-01 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-7689
FAX: 919 541-5450
E-Mail: shrager.brian@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ92

View Related Documents

Title: Residual Risk and Technology Review Amendments to the Primary Aluminum Reduction NESHAP

Abstract: The existing National Emission Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Primary Aluminum Reduction Plants (found in 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LL) was promulgated in 1997 and applies to the owner or operator of each new pitch storage tank, new or existing potline, paste production plant, or anode bake furnace associated with primary aluminum reduction which is located at a major source, as defined in 40 CFR §63.2. Section 112(f)(2) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) directs the EPA to conduct a risk assessment of a source category within 8 years of promulgation of the MACT standards for that source category. Section 112(d)(6) of the CAA directs the EPA to review and revise the MACT standards for a source category, as necessary, every 8 years after promulgation of the MACT standards for that source category, taking into account developments in practices, processes, and control technologies. EPA will conduct the risk assessment and technology review required by the

statue.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 112 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412 Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

Other Judicial Consent decree deadline for proposal 11/04/2011

Other Judicial 06/29/2012

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 12/06/2011 76 FR 76260

NPRM Comment Period End 01/20/2012

Final Action 07/00/2012

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2002-0031

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State; Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: Undetermined Agency Contact: David Putney Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
D-243-02 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-1390
FAX: 909 541-3207
E-Mail: putney.david@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Rochelle Boyd Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
D-243-02 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-1390
FAX: 919 541-3207
E-Mail: boyd.rochelle@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ93View Related Documents

Title: Portland Cement Manufacturing NESHAP and NSPS--Proposed Amendments as a Result of Reconsideration

Abstract: On September 9, 2010 EPA promulgated final amendments to the Portland cement National Emission Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) and New Source Performance Standard (NSPS) rules regulating emissions of air toxics and criteria pollutants. These amendments applied to all cement kilns that do not burn waste materials. (Cement kilns that burn waste are regulated by separate rules covering hazardous waste combustors and commercial and industrial solid waste incinerators). Subsequent to promulgation of the September 9 rule, we received four petitions for reconsideration, two from environmental groups and two from the Portland cement industry. We issued a notice denying in part and granting in part the petitions for reconsideration on May 17, 2011. We are currently developing proposed rule amendments as a result of out reconsideration on several issues. This action will also include any corrections and clarifications discovered to be necessary after promulgation of the September 2010 amendments.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63.1340 to 63.1359; 40 CFR 60.60 to 60.66 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412 Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

Other Statutory Publication Date--Petitioners Brief Due 05/16/2011

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Notice of Reconsideration 05/17/2011 76 FR 28318

NPRM 11/00/2012

Additional Information: EPA publication information: Notice of Reconsideration - http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=EPA-HQ-OAR-2002-0051-3584; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2002-

0051

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State; Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/atw/pcem/pcempg.html Agency Contact: Keith Barnett Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation 1200 Pennsylvania Ave Research Triangle Park , NC 20460
Phone: 919 541-5605
FAX: 919 541-3720
E-Mail: barnett.keith@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ95

View Related Documents

Title: General Permits and Permits by Rule for the Tribal Minor New Source Review Program

Abstract: The Tribal Minor New Source Review (NSR) program applies to new and modified small sources and minor modifications at large sources in Indian Country. The program is implemented through issuance of preconstruction permits that can include, among other requirements, pollutant emission limits for minor sources and voluntary emission limitations on the potential-to-emit of sources that would otherwise be considered major sources. It often uses general permits or permits by rule, which may be applied to a number of similar emission units or stationary sources to simplify permit application and issuance so that a reviewing authority's limited resource needs not be expended for the review of site-specific permits. A general permit or permit by rule may be written to address a single emissions unit, a group of the same type of emissions units, or an entire category of minor sources. General permits and permits by rule offer a cost-effective means of issuing permits and provide a quicker and simpler alternative mechanism for permitting minor sources than the site-specific permitting process. This action proposes general permits for the following five source categories: gas stations, dry cleaners, autobody shops, hot mix asphalt plants, and rock crushing facilities. This action also proposes permits by rule for source categories and a generic permit by rule.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: UndeterminedCFR Citation: 49 CFR 49.151 to 161 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 04/00/2012

Final Action 04/00/2013

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No Agency Contact: Mark Sendzik Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
C-304.03 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5534
FAX: 919 541-0942
E-Mail: sendzik.mark@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Regina Chappell Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
C304-03 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-3650
FAX: 919 541-0942
E-Mail: chappell.regina@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ97

View Related Documents

Title: Widespread Use for Onboard Refueling Vapor Recovery and Stage II Waiver

Abstract: This rule is proposing criteria for determining whether onboard refueling vapor recovery (ORVR) is in widespread use and proposing to determine the date by which such widespread use of ORVR will occur. The Administrator may allow removal of Stage II gasoline vapor recovery from service stations in serious and above areas when widespread use criteria are met. ORVR and Stage II are largely redundant systems that capture VOC and HAP emissions that may escape during vehicle refueling. ORVR is being phased in to more and more new vehicles and its widespread use allows Stage II systems to be decommissioned from gasoline dispensing facilities.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51.126 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 23 USC 101; 42 USC 7401 to 7671(q) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 01/04/2012 77 FR 237

NPRM Comment Period End 02/03/2012

Final Action 06/00/2012

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM - http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=EPA_FRDOC_0001-10741; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1076

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 447110; 447190 Agency Contact: Lynn Dail Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
C539-01 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-2363FAX: 919 541-0824
E-Mail: dail.lynn@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Rich Damberg Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
C539-01 Research Triangle Park , NC 20460
Phone: 919 541-5592
FAX: 919 541-0824
E-Mail: damberg.rich@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ98

View Related Documents

Title: Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Adjustments to the Allowance System for Controlling HCFC Production, Import, and Export for 2012-2014

Abstract: In 2009, EPA finalized a rule allocating hydrochlorofluorocarbon (HCFC) allowances for the 2010-2014 control periods (74 FR 66412). Two allowance holders challenged how EPA established the baselines for HCFC-22 and HCFC-142b in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. The Court vacated the rule in part and remanded it to EPA. This rulemaking responds to the Court's decision with respect to the 2012-2014 control periods.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 82 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7671 to 7671(q) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 12/31/2011 76 FR 237

Final Action 06/00/2012

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-0354

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/ozone/title6/phaseout/classtwo.html

Sectors Affected: 333415; 423620; 325120; 424690; 238220; 423730 Agency Contact: Luke Hall-Jordan Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
6205J Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9591
FAX: 202 343-2338
E-Mail: Hall-Jordan.Luke@epa.gov Agency Contact: Staci Gatica Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
6205J Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9469
FAX: 202 343-2338
E-Mail: Gatica.Staci@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ99

View Related Documents

Title: National Emission Standards for Aerospace Manufacturing and Rework Facilities Risk and Technology Review

Abstract: On September 1, 1995 (60 FR 45948), EPA promulgated the National Emission Standards for AerospaceManufacturing and Rework Facilities (40 CFR part 63, subpart GG) under section 112(d) of the Clean Air Act (CAA). The NESHAP sets Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) standards for existing and new major sources of hazardous air pollutant emissions and includes standards to control volatile organic compounds (VOC) emissions. Under CAA section 112(d)(6) EPA is required to review standards issued under section 112 and to revise them "as necessary (taking into account developments in practices, processes and control technologies)" no less frequently than every 8 years. EPA also must evaluate the MACT standards within 8 years after promulgation and promulgate standards under CAA section 112 (f)(2) if required to provide an ample margin of safety to protect public health or prevent an adverse environmental effect. The source category will be assessed for inhalation risks, including cancer risk and incidence, population cancer risk, and non-cancer effects (chronic and acute). EPA also plans to evaluate multipathway risk associated with those source categories with significant levels of persistent and bioaccumulative HAP. The agency will follow the Benzene Policy to identify the source categories as low risk, acceptable risk, or unacceptable risk. EPA will then evaluate the effectiveness and cost of additional risk reduction options and make acceptability and ample-margin-of-safety determinations. If the need for additional controls are identified, the standards will include technology, work practice, or performance standards as amendments to the existing MACT standards.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412 Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

NPRM Judicial 11/30/2011

Other Judicial 09/28/2012

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 12/00/2011

Final Action 07/00/2012

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2004-0450

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/atw/aerosp/aeropg.html Agency Contact: Kim Teal Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
E-143-03 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5580
FAX: 919 541-3207
E-Mail: teal.kim@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Bob Schell Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
E-143-03 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-4116
FAX: 919 541-3207
E-Mail: schell.bob@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AR00

View Related Documents

Title: Uniform Standards for Equipment Leaks and Ancillary Systems, Closed Vent Systems and Control Devices, Storage Vessels and Transfer Operations, and Wastewater Operations

Abstract: Organic chemical processing industries such as Oil and Gas, Petroleum Refining, and Chemical production have similar emission sources that are often required to be controlled to similar levels by the same type of control devices and work practice standards. The air pollution control regulatory requirements for these sources have evolved and improved as different New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) and Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) have been developed over the years. This has resulted in requirements that are different and in many cases insufficient especially with respect to ensuring continuous compliance. EPA has developed "standardized" regulatory requirements in the past but they are specific to part 60, 61, and 63 rules respectively and are out of date. This action will develop and consolidate state-of-the-art uniform standards that will then become applicable when they are referenced in future regulatory actions, such as new and revised ControlTechnique Guidelines documents, NSPS technology reviews, and MACT Risk and Technology reviews for these industries. The uniform standards are expected to include requirements for work practices and equipment standards and for monitoring, recordkeeping, and reporting requirements. Uniform standards will be developed in this action for the following: 1) equipment leaks and ancillary systems, 2) closed vent systems and control devices, 3) storage vessels and transfer operations, and 4) wastewater operations. In addition to developing the uniform standards, EPA also expects to develop tools for the proper application of these uniform standards during rule development, including anticipated costs and pollutant emission reductions.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: Clean Air Act Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 12/00/2011

Final Action 08/00/2012

Additional Information: Includes Retrospective Review under E.O.13563.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: Undetermined Agency Contact: Brenda Shine Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
E143-01 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-3608
FAX: 919 541-0246
E-Mail: shine.brenda@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Penny Lassiter Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
E1430-01 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5396
FAX: 919 541-0246
E-Mail: lassiter.penny@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AR02

View Related Documents

Title: National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutant Emissions: Group IV Polymers and Resins, Pesticide Active Ingredient Production, and Polyether Polyols Production Risk and Technology Review

Abstract: In this action, EPA will perform risk and technology reviews for three National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP). These NESHAP are under a deadline consent decree for proposal in November 2011 and promulgation in November 2012: Group IV Polymers and Resins, Pesticide Active Ingredient Production, and Polyether Polyols Production. Clean Air Act (CAA) sections 112(f)(2) and 112(d)(6) require EPA to conduct residual risk and technology reviews. Under the "technology review" provision of CAA section 112, EPA is required to review maximum achievable control technology (MACT) standards and to revise them "as necessary (taking into account developments in practices, processes, and control technologies)" no less frequently than every 8 years. Under the "residual risk" provision of CAA section 112, EPA must evaluate the MACT standards within 8 years after promulgation and promulgate standards if required to provide an ample margin of safety to protect public health or prevent an adverse environmental effect. Section 111(b)(1)(B) of the CAA mandates that EPA review and, if appropriate, revise existing NSPS every 8 years. EPA will also remove startup, shutdown, and malfunction exemptions for these source categories, as required by recent court decisions.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60 and 63 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: Clean Air Act secs 111 and 112 Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

NPRM Judicial 11/30/2011Other Judicial 11/30/2012

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: This action addresses EPA's statutory obligations to perform Risk and Technology Reviews (RTR) and NSPS reviews for chemical sector MACT. It will address Clean Air Act (CAA) section 112(f)(2) to conduct residual risk reviews, section 112(d)(6) to conduct technology reviews, and section 111(b)(1)(B) to conduct NSPS reviews for multiple chemical sector source categories. Under the "technology review" provision of CAA section 112, EPA is required to review maximum achievable control technology (MACT) standards and to revise them "as necessary (taking into account developments in practices, processes, and control technologies)" no less frequently than every 8 years. Under the "residual risk" provision of CAA section 112, EPA must evaluate the MACT standards within 8 years after promulgation and promulgate standards if required to provide an ample margin of safety to protect public health or prevent an adverse environmental effect. Under the CAA section 111, EPA must evaluate NSPS requirements and, if appropriate, revise existing NSPS every 8 years.

Legal Basis: CAA sections 111 and 112

Alternatives: Unavailable.

Costs and Benefits: We are currently estimating the costs and benefits associated with this action.

Risks: We are currently assessing the risks associated with this action.

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 01/09/2012 77 FR 1268

NPRM Comment Period End 03/09/2012

Final Action 11/00/2012

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State; Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 325 Agency Contact: Nick Parsons Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
E143-01 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5372
FAX: 919 541-0246
E-Mail: parsons.nick@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Penny Lassiter Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
E1430-01 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5396
FAX: 919 541-0246
E-Mail: lassiter.penny@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AR05

View Related Documents

Title: Revisions to Provisions Governing Alternative to Source-Specific Best Available Retrofit Technology (BART) Determinations, Limited SIP Disapprovals, and Federal Implementation Plans

Abstract: This action will revise provisions in the Regional Haze Rule to substitute requirements of a recently adopted regional cap-and-trade program (the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule) for source-specific Best Available Retrofit Technology (BART) determinations in certain states. This action will also finalize Federal Implementation Plans to allow this alternative approach to immediately take effect so that the Agency and states can meet their obligations to finalize Regional Haze requirements.The focus of this action is to present results of an air quality modeling analysis that assesses whether emission reductions achieved through implementation of a regional cap-and-trade program in certain states results in greater improvements in visibility at Class 1 areas than presumptive source-by-source BART.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51.308 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7491 to 7492 Legal Deadline:Action Source Description Date

Other Statutory The Agency must meet 8 judicial deadlines for related actions that depend on the completion of the subject action by this date. 05/15/2012

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 12/30/2011 76 FR 82219

NPRM Comment Period End 02/13/2012

Final Action 05/00/2012

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: Yes Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.epa.gov/airtransport

Sectors Affected: 221112 Agency Contact: Martha Keating Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
C539-04 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-9407
E-Mail: keating.martha@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Todd Hawes Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
C539-04 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5591
FAX: 919 685-3190
E-Mail: hawes.todd@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AR07

View Related Documents

Title: Addition of New Fuel Pathways Under the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS2) Program

Abstract: This action will amend table 1 to section 80.1426 of the RFS2 regulations to include additional fuel pathways and assigns each pathway a D-Code. It allows producers or importers of fuel produced under these pathways to generate Renewable Identification Numbers under the program, providing that the fuel meets the other requirements for renewable fuel. This action outlines EPA's lifecycle greenhouse gas evaluation, specified in Clean Air Act section 211(o), as amended by EISA for several new pathways including: biofuels produced from camolina oil, biofuels produced from several types of energy grasses, renewable gasoline produced from residue and waste cellulosic feedstocks, biofuels produced from the sugars in specified feedstocks used to produce cellulosic biofuel, and biodiesel produced from free fatty acids through direct esterification. This action adds these pathways to the table of approved fuel pathways.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 80 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: Not Yet Determined Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Rule for 60th ITC List 01/29/2008 73 FR 5109

NPRM 01/05/2012 77 FR 462

Direct Final Action 01/05/2012 77 FR 700

Direct Final Action Comment Period End 02/06/2012

NPRM Comment Period End 02/06/2012

Additional Information: EPA publication information: Final Rule for 60th ITC List - http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPATOX/2008/January/Day-29/t1546.pdf

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: NoAgency Contact: Vincent Camobreco Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
6401A Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-9043
E-Mail: camobreco.vincent@epa.gov Agency Contact: Paul Argyropoulos Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
6401A Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-1123
E-Mail: argyropoulos.paul@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AR10

View Related Documents

Title: Prevention of Significant Deterioration and Title V Greenhouse Gas Tailoring Rule Step 3

Abstract: This rule fulfills EPA's commitment, made in the Final Tailoring Rule, which stated that we would propose or solicit comment on a third step of the phase-in approach. This phase-in approach is designed to relieve the resource burdens by phasing in the applicability of greenhouse gas sources to the Prevention of Deterioration (PSD) and Title V (TV) programs of the Clean Air Act (CAA).

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51; 40 CFR 52; 40 CFR 70; 40 CFR 71 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: Clean Air Act Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 02/00/2012

Final Action 08/00/2012

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State; Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: Undetermined

RIN Information URL: www.epa.gov/nsr Agency Contact: Michael S Brooks Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
C504-05 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-3539
E-Mail: brooks.michaels@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Juan Santiago Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
C504-05 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-1084
FAX: 919-541-5509
E-Mail: santiago.juan@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AR11

View Related Documents

Title: Federal Plan Requirements for Hospital/Medical/Infectious Waste Incinerators Constructed On or Before December 1,

2008

Abstract: On October 6, 2009, EPA adopted amendments to the September 15, 1997, new source performance standards (NSPS) and emissions guidelines (EG) for hospital/medical/infectious waste incinerators (HMIWI). The amendments weredeveloped in response to the March 2, 1999, remand of the 1997 HMIWI regulations by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (the Court), which requested further explanation of EPA's reasoning in determining the minimum regulatory "floors" for new and existing HMIWI. Sections 111 and 129 of the Clean Air Act (CAA) require states with existing HMIWI subject to the EG to submit plans to EPA that implement and enforce the EG. State plans to implement the EG adopted on September 15, 1997, are already in place, and revised or new state plans to implement the amended EG adopted on October 6, 2009, are currently undergoing EPA review. The deadline for states to submit revised/new state plans to EPA for review was October 6, 2010. If a state with existing HMIWI does not submit an approvable plan within 2 years after promulgation of the EG, sections 111(d) and 129 of the CAA require EPA to develop, implement, and enforce a federal plan for HMIWI in the state. The EPA adopted a HMIWI federal plan on August 15, 2000, to implement the September 15, 1997, EG. This action will propose amendments to the HMIWI federal plan to implement the amended EG adopted on October 6, 2009, for those states that do not have an approved revised/new state plan in place by October 6, 2011.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 62 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: CAA sec 111; CAA sec 129 Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

Other Statutory 10/06/2011

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 12/00/2011

Final Action 12/00/2012

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: Docket#A-91-61, A-98-24, and EPA-HQ-OAR-2006-0534

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; State; Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/ttnatw01/129/hmiwi/rihmiwi.html Agency Contact: Amy Hambrick Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
E143-03 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-0964
FAX: 919 541-3470
E-Mail: hambrick.amy@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: David Cozzie Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation 1200 Pennsylvania Ave, NW Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 919 541-5356
E-Mail: cozzie.david@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AR13

View Related Documents

Title: National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Major Sources: Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers and Process Heaters; Proposed Reconsideration

Abstract: EPA estimates the total national capital cost for the proposed reconsideration rule to be approximately $5.4 billion in the year 2015, with a total national annual cost of $1.5 billion in the year 2015. The annual cost, which considers fuel savings, includes control device operation and maintenance, as well as monitoring, recordkeeping, reporting, and performance testing. EPA estimates that implementation of the rulemaking, as proposed, would reduce nationwide emissions from major source boilers and process heaters by: 1,000 to 3,600 pounds per year of mercury, 2,200 tpy of non-mercury metals, 37,000 tpy of HCl, 41,000 tpy of PM, 560,000 tpy of SO2, and 4,700 tpy of volatile organic compounds. These emissions reductions would lead to the following annual health benefits. In 2015, this rule will protect public health by avoiding 3,100 to 8,000 premature deaths, 2,000 cases of chronic bronchitis, 4,900 nonfatal heart attacks, 5,350 hospital and emergency room visits, 4,600 cases of acute bronchitis, 390,000 days when people miss work, 51,000 cases of aggravated asthma, and 96,000 acute respiratory symptoms. The monetized value of the benefits ranges from $27 billion to $67 billion in 2015--outweighing the costs by at least $25 billion.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed RuleMajor: Yes Unfunded Mandates: State, Local, Or Tribal Governments;
Private Sector

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: Clean Air Act sec 112 Legal Deadline: None

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: As a result of the vacatur of the Industrial Boiler MACT, the Agency will develop another rulemaking under CAA section 112, which will reduce hazardous air pollutant (HAP) emissions from this source category. Recent court decisions on other CAA section 112 rules will be considered in developing this regulation.

Legal Basis: Clean Air Act, section 112.

Alternatives: Not yet determined.

Costs and Benefits: EPA estimates the total national capital cost for the final rule to be approximately $9.5 billion in the year 2013, with a total national annual cost of $2.9 billion in the year 2013. The annual cost, which considers fuel savings, includes control device operation and maintenance as well as monitoring, recordkeeping, reporting, and performance testing. EPA estimates that implementation of the rulemaking, as proposed, would reduce nationwide emissions from major source boilers and process heaters by: 15,000 pounds per year of mercury, 3,200 tons per year (tpy) of non-mercury metals, 37,000 tpy of HCl, 50,000 tpy of PM, 340,000 tpy of SO2, 722 grams per year of dioxin, and 1,800 tpy of volatile organic compounds. These emissions reductions would lead to the following annual health benefits. In 2013, this rule will protect public health by avoiding 1,900 to 4,800 premature deaths, 1,300 cases of chronic bronchitis, 3,000 nonfatal heart attacks, 3,200 hospital and emergency room visits, 3,000 cases of acute bronchitis, 250,000 days when people miss work, 33,000 cases of aggravated asthma, and 1,500,000 acute respiratory symptoms. The monetized value of the benefits ranges from $17 billion to $41 billion in 2013-- outweighing the costs by at least $14 billion.

Risks: Not yet determined.

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 12/23/2011 76 FR 80598

NPRM Comment Period End 02/21/2012

Final Action 04/00/2012

Additional Information: Split from RIN 2060-AQ25. Split from RIN 2060-AM44. This rulemaking combines the area source rulemaking for boilers and the rulemaking for reestablishing the vacated NESHAP for boilers and process heaters. EPA Docket
information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2002-0058

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Business; Governmental Jurisdictions; Organizations Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State; Tribal

Federalism: Yes Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 325; 611; 322; 221; 321 Agency Contact: Brian Shrager Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
D243-01 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-7689
FAX: 919 541-5450
E-Mail: shrager.brian@epa.gov Agency Contact: Robert J Wayland Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
D243-01 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-1045
FAX: 919 541-5450
E-Mail: wayland.robertj@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AR14

View Related Documents

Title: National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Area Sources: Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers; Reconsideration and Proposed Rule AmendmentsAbstract: On March 21, 2011, EPA issued a final rule establishing standards for emissions of hazardous air pollutants from boilers located at area sources. EPA also issued on March 21, 2011, a Notice of Reconsideration listing four issues for which additional opportunity for public review and comment should be obtained. Subsequently, we received petitions to reconsider and clarify and amend certain applicability and implementation provisions of the final rule. This action will propose the amendments after we analyze the information submitted in the petitions.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: Clean Air Act sec 112 Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

Other Statutory Tentative date for promulgation of amendments to the rule. 04/30/2012

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: Section 307(d)(7)(B) of the CAA requires EPA to convene a proceeding for reconsideration of the rule if a person raising an objection to the rule can demonstrate to EPA that it was impracticable to raise such objection within the period for public comment or if the grounds for such objection arose after the period for public comment, and if such objection is
of central relevance to the outcome of the rule.

Legal Basis: Clean Air Act, section 112.

Alternatives: Not yet determined.

Costs and Benefits: Cost and benefits numbers for the Boiler Area Source Rule (subpart JJJJJJ) are as follows. Proposal: Total annualized costs = $1.0 billion. Total net monetized benefits = $0.5 billion to $1.9 billion (3% discount rate), $0.4 billion to $1.7 billion (7% discount rate). Non-monetized Benefits = 39,000 tons of carbon monoxide, 130 tons of HCl, 5 tons of HF, 0.75 tons of mercury, 250 tons of other metals, 470 grams of dioxins/furans. Additionally, health effects from NO2 and SO2 exposure diminish, as well as ecosystem effects and visibility impairment. Final: Total annualized costs = $535 million. Total netmonetized benefits = -$280 million to $30 million (3% discount rate), -$300 million to -$20 million (7% discount rate). Nonmonetized Benefits = 1,100 tons of carbon monoxide, 340 tons of HCl, 8 tons of HF, 90 pounds of mercury, 320 tons of other metals, <1 gram of dioxins/furans (TEQ), health effects from SO2 exposure, ecosystem effects, visibility impairment.

Risks: Not yet determined.

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 12/23/2011 76 FR 80532

NPRM Comment Period End 02/21/2012

Final Action 04/00/2012

Additional Information: Split from RIN 2060-AM44. Related to RIN 2060-AQ25. EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2006-

0790

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State; Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 611; 62; 44-45; 321 Agency Contact: Jim Eddinger Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
D243-01 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5426
E-Mail: eddinger.jim@epa.gov Agency Contact: Robert J Wayland Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
D243-01 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-1045
FAX: 919 541-5450
E-Mail: wayland.robertj@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AR15View Related Documents

Title: Standards of Performance for New Stationary Sources and Emission Guidelines for Existing Sources: Commercial and Industrial Solid Waste Incineration Units; Reconsideration and Proposed Amendments

Abstract: On March 21, 2011, EPA issued a final rule establishing new source performance standards and emission guidelines for commercial and industrial solid waste incineration units. EPA also issued on March 21, 2011, a Notice of Reconsideration listing issues for which additional opportunity for public review and comment should be obtained. Subsequently, we received more than 15 petitions to reconsider, clarify, and amend certain provisions of the final rule. This action will propose the amendments after we analyze the information submitted in the petitions.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60; 40 CFR 62 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq Legal Deadline: None

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: As a result of the vacatur of the CISWI definition and the remand of the CISWI rule, the Agency will develop another rulemaking under CAA section 129 that will reduce hazardous air pollutant (HAP) emissions from this source category. Recent court decisions on other rules will be considered in developing this regulation.

Legal Basis: Clean Air Act, section 129

Alternatives: Not yet determined

Costs and Benefits: EPA estimates the total national capital cost for the final rule to be approximately $706 million in the year 2013, with a total national annual cost of $280 million in the year 2013. The annual cost, which considers fuel savings, includes control device operation and maintenance as well as monitoring, recordkeeping, reporting, and performance testing. EPA estimates that implementation of the rulemaking, as proposed, would reduce nationwide emissions from commercial and industrial solid waste incineration units by: 5,700 tons per year (tpy) of acid gases (i.e., hydrogen chloride and sulfur dioxide), 1,600 tpy of particulate matter, 23,000 tpy of carbon monoxide, 5,700 tpy of nitrogen oxides, and 5.5 tpy of metals (i.e., lead, cadmium, and mercury) and dioxins/furans. These emissions reductions would lead to the following annual health benefits. In 2013, this rule will protect public health by avoiding 40 to 100 premature deaths, 27 cases of chronic bronchitis, 64 nonfatal heart attacks, 68 hospital and emergency room visits, 65 cases of acute bronchitis, 1,350 cases of respiratory symptoms, 5,300 days when people miss work or school, 700 cases of aggravated asthma, and 31,000 days when people must restrict their activities. The monetized value of the benefits ranges from $360 to $870 million in 2013–outweighing the costs by at least $80

million.

Risks: Not yet determined

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 12/23/2011 76 FR 80452

NPRM Comment Period End 02/21/2012

Final Action 04/00/2012

Additional Information: Split from RIN 2060-AO12. EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2003-0119

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 325; 334; 3254; 321 Agency Contact: Toni Jones Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
E143-03 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-0316
FAX: 919 541-3470
E-Mail: jones.toni@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Charlene Spells Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
E-143-05 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5255
FAX: 919 541-3470
E-Mail: spells.charlene@epa.govEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AR16

View Related Documents

Title: National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Area Source Standards for Prepared Feeds Manufacturing —

Amendments

Abstract: Section 112(k) of the Clean Air Act requires the development of standards for area sources that account for 90 percent of the emissions in urban areas of the 30 urban hazardous air pollutants (HAP) listed in the Integrated Urban Air Toxics Strategy. The Integrated Urban Air Toxics Strategy lists prepared feeds manufacturing as an area source category. EPA issued national emission standards for control of HAP for the Prepared Feeds Manufacturing area source category on January 5, 2010 (75 FR 522). In determining Generally Available Control Technology (GACT), EPA assumed that the vast majority of prepared feeds manufacturers were already meeting the cyclone design efficiency standard promulgated in the final rule. In light of issues raised by industry with regard to the certification requirements associated with the design efficiency standard, this action is to revise the rule to clarify, consistent with the rulemaking record and preamble of the final rule, that GACT for larger sources is the equipment practice of using a cyclone. This action will also clarify certain management practices in 63.11621(a)(1) and 63.11621(d).

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: CAA 112 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Direct Final Action 12/23/2011 76 FR 80261

NPRM 12/23/2011 76 FR 80314

NPRM Comment Period End 01/23/2012

Additional Information: Split from RIN 2060-AO98; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0080

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 311119 Agency Contact: Jan King Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
C404-05 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5665
FAX: 919 541-0242
E-Mail: King.Jan@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Chebryll Edwards Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
C404-05 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5428
FAX: 919 541-0242
E-Mail: Edwards.Chebryll@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AR19

View Related Documents

Title: Implementation of the 1-Hour SO2 NAAQS

Abstract: This rule will propose to provide state, local agencies, and tribes with the necessary information to comply with the 1- hour SO2 NAAQS. The rule will address the State Implementation Plan (SIP) requirements necessary for states to submit approvable maintenance SIPs as required under section 110(a)(1) of the Clean Air Act (CAA). The rule will address the requirements for adopting an emissions inventory, an attainment demonstration using refined air quality dispersion modeling, a contingency plan, control measures, as well as information on how states with areas designated as unclassifiable, which are required to submit maintenance SIPs under section 110(a)(1) of the CAA, can be redesignated to attainment.Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: CAA 110(a)(1) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Action 00/00/0000

NPRM 07/00/2012

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No Agency Contact: Larry Wallace Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
C539-01 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-0906
FAX: 919 541-0824
E-Mail: wallace.larry@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Rich Damberg Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
C539-01 Research Triangle Park , NC 20460
Phone: 919 541-5592
FAX: 919 541-0824
E-Mail: damberg.rich@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AR20

View Related Documents

Title: Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Amendment to HFO-1234yf SNAP Rule for Motor Vehicle Air Conditioning Sector

Abstract: This action would update a rule requirement in the SNAP rule for HFO-1234yf to use the latest edition of a standard from SAE (Society of Automotive Engineers) International. The revised standard would require use of a more robust fitting that is less likely to leak than that currently cited in the March 29, 2011, SNAP rule (76 FR 17488). Updating the standard would reduce emissions and ensure consistency with industry standards.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 82 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7671(k) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Direct Final Action 02/00/2012

NPRM 02/00/2012

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/ozone/snap Agency Contact: Margaret Sheppard Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
6205J Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9163
FAX: 202 343-2338
E-Mail: sheppard.margaret@epa.gov Agency Contact: Yaidi Cancel Environmental Protection AgencyAir and Radiation
6205J Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9512
FAX: 202 343-2338
E-Mail: cancel.yaidi@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AR21

View Related Documents

Title: Amendments to the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS2)

Abstract: The RFS2 program was required by the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (EISA 2007), which amended the Clean Air Act (CAA). The final regulations for RFS2 were published in the Federal Register on March 26, 2010 (75 FR 14670). EPA has previously published clarifications and modifications, and technical amendments, to the final RFS2 regulations. This proposed regulation would provide additional clarifications, modifications, and technical amendments to RFS2 and will clarify, modify and technically amend other fuels programs in 40 CFR part 80.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 80(M) (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: Clean Air Act, title II Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 04/00/2012

Final Action 11/00/2012

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No Agency Contact: Anne-Marie Pastorkovich Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
6406J Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9623
FAX: 202 343-2801
E-Mail: pastorkovich.anne-marie@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AR25

View Related Documents

Title: Review of New Sources and Modifications in Indian Country; Definitions and Exempted Units and Activities

Abstract: This rule will propose whether to exempt additional units or activities from the minor NSR program in Indian Country that was published on July 1, 2011. This supplemental proposal will request additional information to support which additional units and activities should be exempted. Additional definitions will be provided to clarify terms used in this minor source

program.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 49.151 to 49.161; 49 CFR 49.166 to 49.173 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Action 00/00/0000

NPRM 10/00/2012Additional Information: Split from RIN 2060-AH37; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2003-0076

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/nsr/

Sectors Affected: 924110; 33311; 23899; 3116; 3323; 324121; 811121; 3251; 72112; 323110; 212321; 211111; 22111; 4471; 42451; 331511; 332812; 32191; 221210; 211112; 21111; 311119; 3329; 3279; 42471; 32711; 32732; 54171; 321113; 22132; 321212; 562212; 33711 Agency Contact: Cheryl Vetter Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
C504-03 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-4391
FAX: 919 541-5509
E-Mail: vetter.cheryl@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Raj Rao Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
C504-03 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5344
FAX: 919 541-5509
E-Mail: rao.raj@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AR32

View Related Documents

Title: Implementation of the 2008 NAAQS for Ozone: Nonattainment Area Classifications Approach, Attainment Deadlines and Revocation of the 1997 Ozone Standards for Transportation Conformity Purposes

Abstract: This NPRM will propose rules for implementing the 2008 8-hour Ozone NAAQS. This proposal will address the classification system and attainment deadlines for designated nonattainment areas.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51; 40 CFR 50 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7409; 42 USC 7410; 42 USC 7511-7511f; 42 USC 7601(a)(1) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 02/00/2012

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

Related RINs: Previously Reported as 2060-AP24 Agency Contact: Karl Pepple Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
C539-01 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-2683
FAX: 919 541-0824
E-Mail: pepple.karl@epa.gov Agency Contact: Richard Damberg Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
C504-02 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5592
FAX: 919 541-5489
E-Mail: damberg.rich@epa.govEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AH23

View Related Documents

Title: Quality Assurance Requirements for Continuous Opacity Monitoring Systems

Abstract: This rulemaking adds a procedure 3 to appendix F of 40 CFR part 60. This action provides quality assurance specifications for continuous opacity monitor system (COMS) installed for compliance. States may also cite this procedure for sources with installed COMS subject to compliance limitations. Minimum quality control (QC) and quality assurance (QA) requirements are specified to assess the quality of COMS performance. Daily zero and span checks, quarterly performance audits, and annual zero alignment checks are required in order to assure the proper functioning of the COMS and the accuracy
of the COMS data.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7411 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 02/28/2001 66 FR 12780

NPRM Comment Period End 03/28/2001

Final Action 12/00/2011

Additional Information: SAN No. 3958; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2003-0115.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.epa.gov/ttn/emc/proposed/m203.pdf Agency Contact: Jason Dewees Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
E143-02 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-9724
FAX: 919 541-0516
E-Mail: dewees.jason@epa.gov Agency Contact: Conniesue Oldham Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
E143-02 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-7774
FAX: 919 541-0516
E-Mail: oldham.conniesue@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AJ82

View Related Documents

Title: Modification of the Anti-Dumping Baseline Date Cut-Off Limit for Data Used in Development of an Individual Baseline

Abstract: "Dumping" refers to the practice whereby refiners making clean fuels for certain markets (such as reformulated gasoline for clean-air purposes) take the pollutants removed from the clean fuels and "dump" them into other fuels they are producing for other markets. This, if allowed, would make those other fuels even dirtier than before, and so the Clean Air Act prohibits this practice. EPA has existing "anti-dumping" rules on the books that codify this Clean Air Act prohibition. This regulation is a minor technical amendment to those existing regulations.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 80.91(b)(1)(i); 40 CFR 80.93(a) (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7414; 42 USC 7521(1); 42 USC 7545; 42 USC 7601(a)Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Direct Final Action 08/00/2012

Additional Information: SAN No. 4604

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 32411 Agency Contact: Christine Brunner Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
AAHEBTC Ann Arbor , MI 48105
Phone: 734 214-4287
E-Mail: Brunner.Christine@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Patrice Simms Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

2344 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-5593
E-Mail: Simms.Patrice@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AK26

View Related Documents

Title: Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Listing of Substitutes for Ozone-Depleting Substances: N-Propyl Bromide

Abstract: This rule would make a determination as to whether n-propylbromide (nPB) is an acceptable substitute for Class I and Class II ozone depleting substances used in aerosol solvent and adhesives end uses. If found acceptable, this would provide industry with another alternative to solvents with higher ozone depletion potential. An acceptability determination could include specific conditions on the use of nPB as a solvent, such as limiting the specific applications in which it may be used to those with low emissions and requiring exposure limits that would be sufficient to mitigate risk and that are consistent with industry practices. Any conditions would be for the purpose of ensuring that nPB is used in a manner that is as safe and environmentally protective as other available substitutes. OSHA does not currently regulate nPB. If we determine that nPB cannot be used safely in a specific end use, as compared with other substitutes available for that end use, we would find it unacceptable.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 82 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7414; 42 USC 7601; 42 USC 7671 to 7671q Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM1 06/03/2003 68 FR 33283

NPRM Correction 10/02/2003 68 FR 56809

NPRM 2 - Adhesives 05/30/2007 72 FR 30168

Final Action 06/00/2012

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM1 - http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-AIR/2003/June/Day03/a13254.htm; Split from RIN 2060-AJ58. The previous ANPRM was under SAN No. 3525; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQOAR-2002-0064

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/ozone/snap/index.html

Sectors Affected: 334; 335; 337; 23832; 336; 32615Agency Contact: Margaret Sheppard Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
6205J Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9163
FAX: 202 343-2338
E-Mail: sheppard.margaret@epa.gov Agency Contact: Melissa Fiffer Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
6205J Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9464
FAX: 202 343-2342
E-Mail: fiffer.melissa@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AK54

View Related Documents

Title: National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP): General Provisions; Amendments for Pollution Prevention Alternative Compliance Requirements

Abstract: These are amendments to the part 63 General Provisions which would allow facilities that are subject to maximum achievable control technology (MACT) to discontinue those requirements if, through pollution prevention measures, they achieve and can demonstrate continued hazardous air pollutant (HAP) emission reductions equivalent to or better than the MACT level of control. The amendments would also allow a source to avoid MACT by completely eliminating HAP emissions.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63.2; 40 CFR 63.17; 40 CFR 63.18 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 05/15/2003 68 FR 26249

Final Action 11/00/2012

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM - http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-AIR/2003/May/Day15/a12180.htm; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2002-0044

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State; Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No Agency Contact: Matthew Witosky Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
D205-02 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-2865
E-Mail: witosky.matthew@epa.gov Agency Contact: Lisa Conner Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
D205-02 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5060
E-Mail: conner.lisa@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AK69

View Related DocumentsTitle: Anti-Dumping Baseline Recalculation for Downstream Oxygenate Addition

Abstract: This rule would allow a refiner who added oxygenate after sampling and just before shipment to exclude that oxygenate from its anti-dumping baseline determination. This exclusion of oxygenate is already allowed for a refinery's gasoline to which oxygenate was added outside of the refinery gate. This rule will have limited application, and could provide relief to
small refiners.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 80.91 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7414; 42 USC 7545; 42 USC 7601(a) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Direct Final Action 09/00/2012

Additional Information: SAN No. 4706

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 32411; 4247 Agency Contact: Christine Brunner Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
AAHEBTC Ann Arbor , MI 48105
Phone: 734 214-4287
E-Mail: Brunner.Christine@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Patrice Simms Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

2344 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-5593
E-Mail: Simms.Patrice@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AM09

View Related Documents

Title: Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Amendments to the Section 608 Leak Repair Regulations

Abstract: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing changes to the leak repair regulations promulgated under section 608 of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 (CAA or Act). EPA is proposing to lower the leak repair trigger rates for comfort cooling, commercial refrigeration, and industrial process refrigeration and air-conditioning equipment (i.e., appliances) with ozone-depleting refrigerant charges greater than 50 pounds. This action proposes to streamline existing required practices and associated reporting and record keeping requirements by establishing similar leak repair requirements for owners or operators of comfort cooling, commercial refrigeration, and industrial process refrigeration appliances. This action also proposes to reduce the use and emissions of ozone-depleting refrigerants by requiring the following: verification and documentation of all repairs, retrofit or retirement of appliances that cannot be sufficiently repaired, mandatory replacement of appliance components that have a history of failures, and mandatory record keeping of the determination of the full charge and the fate of recovered refrigerant.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 82.150 to 82.169 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7671 et seq Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 12/15/2010 75 FR 78558

NPRM Comment Period End 02/14/2011
NPRM Comment Period Reopened 02/23/2011 76 FR 9987
NPRM Comment Period Reopened End 03/25/2011Final Action 06/00/2012

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM - http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=EPA-HQ-OAR2003-0167-0032; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2003-0167

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.epa.gov/ozone/title6/608

Sectors Affected: 72; 3118; 312112; 31212; 325; 6113; 445120; 6111; 49313; 713940; 447110; 622; 312113; 6112; 531312; 324110; 49312; 312111; 445110; 45291 Agency Contact: Keilly Witman Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
6205J Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202-343-9742
FAX: 202-565-2338
E-Mail: Witman.Keilly@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AM54

View Related Documents

Title: Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Listing of Substitutes in the Motor Vehicle Air Conditioning Sector Under the Significant New Alternatives Policy (SNAP) Program

Abstract: Under the Significant New Alternatives Policy (SNAP) program, EPA evaluates alternatives to ozone-depleting substances to ensure that they do not increase overall risks to human health and the environment. If finalized as proposed, this rule would expand the list of acceptable substitutes (subject to use conditions) for use in the motor vehicle air conditioning (MVAC) sector. EPA has already issued a final rule for the other substitute addressed in this proposal, R-152a. This final action pertains to R-744.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 82.180 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7671(k) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 09/21/2006 71 FR 55140

First Final Action 06/12/2008 73 FR 33304
Notice of Data Availability 09/17/2009 74 FR 47774

Second Final Action 04/00/2012

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM - http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-AIR/2006/September/Day21/a7967.htm; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2004-0488

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise be of
international interest.

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/ozone/snap/refrigerants/lists/mvacs.html

Sectors Affected: 336391 Agency Contact: Yaidi Cancel Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
6205J Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9512
FAX: 202 343-2338
E-Mail: cancel.yaidi@epa.gov Agency Contact: Margaret Sheppard Environmental Protection AgencyAir and Radiation
6205J Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9163
FAX: 202 343-2338
E-Mail: sheppard.margaret@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AN01

View Related Documents

Title: Component Durability Procedures for New Light Duty Vehicles, Light Duty Trucks & Heavy Duty Vehicles

Abstract: On October 22, 2002 the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit vacated durability provisions that automotive manufacturers used to demonstrate that the emissions of their vehicles would comply with emission standards for the useful lives of those vehicles. The Court also required EPA to issue new regulations. This action fulfills the mandate. The new durability regulations will include options that a manufacturer may choose from to age pre-production vehicles to determine the rate of emission deterioration over the vehicle's useful life. The options will include a prescribed fixed driving cycle and a prescribed bench aging cycle that are used to age prototype vehicles or emission control components to the equivalent of the useful life period of the vehicle in a manner that replicates the aging that the vehicle or components would see in actual use. This rule does not change the federal emission standards or the test procedures used to quantify emissions. Although there is no court-ordered deadline, this is a court-ordered action.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 86 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7521 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite
Supplemental 2 NPRM 01/17/2006 71 FR 2843

Final Action 04/00/2012

Additional Information: EPA publication information: Supplemental 2 NPRM - http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPAAIR/2006/January/Day-17/a073.htm; Split from RIN 2060-AK76; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2002-0079

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 3361 Agency Contact: David Good Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
AAPTIG Ann Arbor , MI 48105
Phone: 734 214-4450
E-Mail: Good.David@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AN33

View Related Documents

Title: National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP): Polyvinyl Chloride and Copolymers Production,

Amendments

Abstract: This action will promulgate National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) and Copolymers. These standards were proposed on December 8, 2000 (65 FR 76958) and promulgated on July 10, 2002 (67 FR 45886) but were vacated by the D.C. Circuit on June 18, 2004 in Mossville Environmental Action v. EPA, 370 F.3d 1232 (D.C.Cir. 2004). This current action assures continuity of the parts of the standard that were upheld by the court, and addresses the component of these standards, regarding the use of vinyl chloride as a surrogate for all other HAP, that was not upheld by the court. Data that is gathered from this industry which will include an information request and source testing of the manufacturing process, will assist in compiling a list of HAP from PVC and copolymer production industry other than vinyl chloride; assessing control measures; determining whether using vinyl chloride as surrogate; and developing new standards forthis source category.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412 Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

NPRM Judicial Settlement agreement 04/15/2011

Other Judicial Settlement agreement 01/13/2012

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 05/20/2011 76 FR29528

NPRM Comment Period Extended 07/19/2011 76 FR 42613

NPRM Comment Period Extended End 08/02/2011

Final Action 01/00/2012

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM - http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=EPA-HQ-OAR2002-0037-0112; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2002-0037

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 325211 Agency Contact: Jodi Howard Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
E143-01 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-4607
FAX: 919 541-0246
E-Mail: Howard.Jodi@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AN63

View Related Documents

Title: Requirements for Reformulated Gasoline (RFG) Under the 8-Hour Ozone Standard for Bump-up Areas Designated
Attainment for the 1-hour Ozone Standard Prior to Revocation

Abstract: Reformulated Gasoline (RFG) is gasoline blended to reduce emissions that cause ozone smog. The Clean Air Act (CAA) requires certain areas to use RFG, depending on how serious is the ozone problem -- i.e., how far it is from attaining the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for ozone. In some cases, areas that previously had a less-serious ozone problem subsequently experience worse air quality, and in such cases the Clean Air Act requires them to be "bumped up" to a higher category, thereby requiring RFG use. One complication is that the Agency is now implementing the transition from the previous ozone standard, based on the amount of pollution measured over a 1-hour period, to the new ozone standard, based on an 8-hour period. This rule would set regulations for such cases.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 80 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: Clean Air Act 211(k) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 06/23/2006 71 FR 36042

Final Action 03/00/2012

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM - http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-AIR/2006/June/Day23/a5620.htm; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2006-0318

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: NoSmall Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 32411; 4247; 48422; 48423 Agency Contact: Kurt Gustafson Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
6406J Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9219
FAX: 202 343-2800
E-Mail: gustafson.kurt@epa.gov Agency Contact: Leila Cook Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
AASMCG Ann Arbor , MI 48105
Phone: 734 214-4820
E-Mail: cook.leila@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AN99

View Related Documents

Title: NESHAP: Mercury Cell Chlor-Alkali Plants--Amendments

Abstract: This action is a final for the amendments of the national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) for mercury emissions from mercury cell chlor-alkali plants that was promulgated in 2003. The 2003 NESHAP limited mercury air emissions from existing plants and prohibited the use of mercury in new plants. Following promulgation of the 2003 NESHAP, EPA received a petition to reconsider several aspects of the rule from the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC). NRDC also filed a petition for judicial review of the rule in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. By a letter dated April 8, 2004, EPA granted NRDC’s petition for reconsideration, and on July 20, 2004, the Court placed the petition for judicial review in abeyance pending EPA’s action on the reconsideration. In May 2008, EPA proposed amendments in response to NRDC’s petition for reconsideration. The 2008 amendments proposed changes to the regulation for cell room fugitive mercury emissions to require recordkeeping of work practice standards for cell rooms in all facilities as well as to require instrumental monitoring of cell room fugitive mercury emissions for all plants. The 2008 proposed rule also amended aspects of the 2003 NESHAP to correct errors and inconsistencies that had been brought to EPA's attention since the NESHAP was promulgated. This supplemental proposal in March 2011, covered technical corrections, revised start and shutdown requirements, and included a proposed additional control option. This action will finalize those amendments.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 06/11/2008 73 FR 33258

NPRM Comment Period End 08/11/2008
Supplemental NPRM 03/14/2011 76 FR 13852
Supplemental NPRM Comment Period End 05/13/2011

Final Action 09/00/2012

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM - http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=090000648061e497; EPA Docket information: EPA–
HQ– OAR–2002–0017

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/atw/hgcellcl/hgcellclpg.html

Sectors Affected: 325181 Agency Contact: Nathan Topham Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
D 243-02Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-0483
FAX: 919 541-3207
E-Mail: topham.nathan@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Steve Fruh Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
D243-02 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-2837
FAX: 919 541-4991
E-Mail: fruh.steve@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AO25

View Related Documents

Title: Revision of Hearing-Protector Regulations

Abstract: EPA plans to undertake a revision of its regulation at 40 CFR 211(B), regarding the labeling of products that are sold wholly or in part on the basis of their ability to reduce the level of sound entering a person's ears, typically referred to as "Hearing Protectors." This action is being taken under the authority of section 8 of the Noise Control Act of 1972, which authorizes EPA to revise the current compliance test methodologies as necessary, and incorporate new test methods and rating schemes to address hearing protector technologies that have evolved since initial promulgation of the regulation in 1979.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 211(B) (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: Noise Control Act of 1972, 8 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 08/05/2009 74 FR 39150

NPRM Comment Period Extended 08/21/2009 74 FR 42223

Final Action 12/00/2011

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM - http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-AIR/2009/August/Day05/a18003.pdf; EPA Docket information: EPA–HQ–OAR–2003–0024

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 339113 Agency Contact: Ken Feith Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation

6103 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-1679
FAX: 202 564-1677
E-Mail: Feith.Ken@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Catrice Jefferson Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

6103 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-1668
FAX: 202 564-1677
E-Mail: Jefferson.Catrice@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AO31

View Related DocumentsTitle: Amendment of Definitions for National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Pollutants for Radionuclides

Abstract: Subparts H and I of 40 CFR part 61 establish standards under the Clean Air Act for emissions of radionuclides other than radon from Department of Energy (DOE) and other non-DOE federal facilities. The current definition of "effective dose equivalent" refers to a method of calculation in International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) publication no. 26. Removing this reference will prevent confusion if EPA incorporates newer ICRP methods for calculating effective dose equivalent in its compliance models.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 61.90(a); 40 CFR 61.101(a) (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Direct Final Action 04/00/2012

Additional Information: SAN No. 5114

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No Agency Contact: Dan Schultheisz Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
6608J Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9349
FAX: 202 343-2304
E-Mail: schultheisz.daniel@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AO70

View Related Documents

Title: Adoption of International NOx Standard for Aircraft Engines

Abstract: This rulemaking would amend the existing United States regulations governing the exhaust emissions from new commercial aircraft gas turbine engines. This action would adopt standards equivalent to the NOx standards of the United Nations International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), and thereby bring the United States emission standards into alignment with the internationally adopted standards. The action would also adopt updated ICAO recommended practices such as amended test procedures and definitions. These NOx standards and recommended practices were adopted by ICAO's Committee on Aviation Environmental Protection (CAEP) in 2004 and 2010. The proposed rule would establish consistency between United States and international requirements.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 87 (revision) (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7571 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 07/27/2011 76 FR 45012

Final Action 02/00/2012

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM - http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2011-07-27/pdf/2011- 17660.pdf

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 336412; 336411 Agency Contact: Bryan Manning Environmental Protection AgencyAir and Radiation
2000 Traverwood Dr. Ann Arbor , MI 48105
Phone: 734 214-4832
FAX: 734 214-4816
E-Mail: Manning.Bryan@epa.gov Agency Contact: Glenn Passavant Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
2000 Traverwood Dr. Ann Arbor , MI 48105
Phone: 734 214-4408
FAX: 734 214-4816
E-Mail: Passavant.Glenn@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AO72

View Related Documents

Title: Review of the Secondary National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Oxides of Nitrogen and Oxides of Sulfur

Abstract: Under the Clean Air Act, EPA is required to review and, if appropriate, revise the air quality criteria for the primary (health-based) and secondary (welfare-based) national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) every 5 years. On October 11, 1995, EPA published a final rule not to revise either the primary or secondary NAAQS for nitrogen dioxide (NO2). On May 22, 1996, EPA published a final decision that revisions of the primary and secondary NAAQS for sulfur dioxide (SO2) were not appropriate at that time, aside from several minor technical changes. On December 9, 2005, EPA's Office of Research and Development (ORD) initiated the current periodic review of NO2 air quality criteria with a call for information in the Federal Register (FR). On May 3, 2006, ORD initiated the current periodic review of SO2 air quality criteria with a call for information in the FR. Subsequently, the decision was made to review the oxides of nitrogen and the oxides of sulfur together, rather than individually, with respect to a secondary welfare standard for NO2 and SO2. This decision derives from the fact that NO2, SO2, and their associated transformation products are linked from an atmospheric chemistry perspective, as well as from an environmental effects perspective, most notably in the case of secondary aerosol formation and acidification in ecosystems. This review includes the preparation of an Integrated Science Assessment (ISA), Risk/Exposure Assessment (REA), and a Policy Assessment Document (PAD) by EPA, with opportunities for review by EPA's Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee and the public. These documents inform the Administrator's proposed decision as to whether to retain or revise the standards. It should be noted that this review will be limited to only the secondary standards; the primary standards for SO2 and NO2 were reviewed separately. The ISA, REA, and PAD have been completed, and a notice of proposed rulemaking was signed on July 12, 2011. The court ordered date for the final rule to be signed is March 20, 2012.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: Undetermined Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 50 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7408; 42 USC 7409 Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

NPRM Judicial The court has approved the amendments to the consent decree incorporating the revised dates. 07/12/2011

Other Judicial 03/20/2012

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: As established in the Clean Air Act, the national ambient air quality standards for oxides of nitrogen and oxides of sulfur are to be reviewed every 5 years.

Legal Basis: Section 109 of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7409) directs the Administrator to propose and promulgate "primary" and "secondary" national ambient air quality standards for pollutants identified under section 108 (the "criteria" pollutants). The "primary" standards are established for the protection of public health, while "secondary" standards are to protect against public welfare or ecosystem effects.

Alternatives: The main alternatives for the Administrator's decision on the review of the national ambient air quality standards for oxides of nitrogen and oxides of sulfur are whether to retain or revise the existing standards.

Costs and Benefits: The Clean Air Act makes clear that the economic and technical feasibility of attaining standards are not to be considered in setting or revising the NAAQS, although such factors may be considered in the development of State plans to implement the standards. Accordingly, the Agency prepares cost and benefit information in order to provide States information that may be useful in considering different implementation strategies for meeting proposed or final standards. Cost and benefit information is not developed to support a NAAQS rulemaking until sufficient policy and scientific information is available to narrow potential options for the form and level associated with any potential revisions to the standard. Therefore,work on developing the plan for conducting the cost and benefit analysis will generally start 1 1/2 to 2 years following the start
of a NAAQS review.

Risks: During the course of this review, risk assessments may be conducted to evaluate public welfare risks associated with retention or revision of the NOx/SOx secondary standards.

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite
Notice--Public Meeting 08/08/2011 76 FR 48073

NPRM 08/01/2011 76 FR 46084

Final Action 04/00/2012

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM - http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=EPA_FRDOC_0001-10843; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-1145

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State; Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No Agency Contact: Rich Scheffe Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
C304-02 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-4650
FAX: 919 541-0237
E-Mail: scheffe.rich@epa.gov Agency Contact: Karen Martin Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
C504-06 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5274
FAX: 919 541-0237
E-Mail: Martin.Karen@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AO96

View Related Documents

Title: Implementation of the 1997 8-Hr Ozone NAAQS: Classification of Subpart 1 Areas and Revision to AntiBacksliding Provisions; Deletion of Obsolete 1-Hr Ozone Standard Provisions

Abstract: This final action would revise the rule for implementation of the 1997 8-hour ozone national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS) to address several issues vacated by the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. The rulemaking would remove the portions of the regulatory text vacated by the Court. The rule would also address: (1) the classification system for nonattainment areas that the implementation rule originally covered under Clean Air Act (CAA) title I, part D, subpart 1; and (2) contingency measures that apply as anti-backsliding measures under the now-revoked 1-hour standard. The rule would also remove an obsolete provision in the 1-hour ozone standard itself (40 CFR 50.9(c)).

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51; 40 CFR 50; 40 CFR 81 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7410; 42 USC 7511 to 7511f; 42 USC 7601(a)(1) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 01/16/2009 74 FR 2936

NPRM Comment Period End 02/17/2009

Final Action 12/00/2011

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM -http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=09000064808228f1; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQOAR-2007-0956

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Governmental
Jurisdictions Government Levels Affected: Local; StateFederalism: No Energy Affected: No Agency Contact: Lynn Dail Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
C539-01 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-2363
FAX: 919 541-0824
E-Mail: dail.lynn@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Rich Damberg Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
C539-01 Research Triangle Park , NC 20460
Phone: 919 541-5592
FAX: 919 541-0824
E-Mail: damberg.rich@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP08

View Related Documents

Title: Revisions to Test Method for Determining Stack Gas Velocity Taking Into Account Velocity Decay Near the Stack Walls

Abstract: This action revises the voluntary test method for determining volumetric gas flow taking into account the velocity decay near the stack or duct walls. The current method addresses only sources where the flow measurements are made in
locations with circular cross-sections. This revised test method addresses flow measurement locations with both circular and rectangular cross-sections, increases the accuracy of the method, and simplifies its application. The primary users of the method are owners and operators of utility units subject to the Acid Rain program and large electric generating units and large non-generating units that are subject to the nitrogen oxide State Implementation Plan call.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: Clean Air Act title I Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 08/25/2009 74 FR 42819

Final Action 06/00/2012

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM - http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-AIR/2009/August/Day25/a20395.pdf; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0697

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 221112 Agency Contact: Jason Dewees Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
E143-02 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-9724
FAX: 919 541-0516
E-Mail: dewees.jason@epa.gov Agency Contact: Conniesue Oldham Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
E143-02 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-7774
FAX: 919 541-0516
E-Mail: oldham.conniesue@epa.govEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP15

View Related Documents

Title: Ambient Ozone Monitoring Regulations: Revisions to Network Design Requirements

Abstract: Ozone monitoring requirements were last revised in October 2006 during a comprehensive revision of ambient monitoring requirements contained in 40 CFR parts 50, 53, and 58. These changes included revised minimum monitoring requirements for ozone monitors in urban areas as well as changes to the length of the required monitoring season. As stated in the Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) final rule published on March 27, 2008 (73 FR 16436), EPA believed that certain changes were needed in the ozone minimum monitoring requirements to account for the revised levels ofthe NAAQS (primary and secondary NAAQS levels for ozone were revised from an eight-hour level of 0.08 ppm to an eighthour level of 0.075 ppm). EPA proposed such monitoring network design changes on July 16, 2009 (74 FR 34525) which included: (1) changes to minimum monitoring requirements in urban areas, (2) new monitoring requirements in non-urban areas, and (3) revisions to the length of the ozone monitoring season where indicated by statistical analysis. In this rulemaking, EPA will finalize changes to ozone monitoring requirements based on public comments received from the 2009 proposal, technical analysis of updated ozone monitoring data covering the period of 2007-2009, and selected use of new data for 2010 that was referenced in a Notice of Data Availability published on November 10, 2010 (75 FR 69036).

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 58 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7403; 42 USC 7410; 42 USC 7601(a); 42 USC 7611; 42 USC 7619 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 07/16/2009 74 FR 34525

Final Action 02/00/2012

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM - http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-AIR/2009/July/Day16/a16802.pdf; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0338

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; State; Local; Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No Agency Contact: Lewis Weinstock Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
C304-06 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-3661
FAX: 919 541-1903
E-Mail: weinstock.lewis@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP30

View Related Documents

Title: Implementation of the 1997 8-hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard: NSR Anti-Backsliding

Abstract: This action will revise the rule for implementing the 1997 8-hour ozone national ambient air quality standard(NAAQS). The rule will address how nonattainment major new source review (NSR) requirements apply under the antibacksliding provisions of the implementation rule in response to a partial vacatur by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of
Columbia Circuit.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7410; 42 USC 7511 to 7511f; 42 USC 7601(a)(1) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 08/24/2010 75 FR 51960Final Action 05/00/2012

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM - http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=0900006480b38bb4; Split from RIN 2060-AO96; EPA
Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0462

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.epa.gov/nsr

Sectors Affected: 325520; 325181; 325188; 325199; 325998; 336399; 331311; 336111; 325414; 325182; 325192; 221121; 221122; 325193; 325920; 221112; 336312; 221111; 325413; 325120; 325131; 336112; 325411; 336992; 336213; 336211; 336340; 336330; 336350; 221210; 211112; 322122; 221113; 221119; 336322; 322121; 322130; 325110; 324110; 325412; 486210; 325910; 322110; 325132; 336212 Agency Contact: David Painter Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
C504-03 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5515
FAX: 919 541-5509
E-Mail: painter.david@epa.gov Agency Contact: Raj Rao Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
C504-03 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5344
FAX: 919 541-5509
E-Mail: rao.raj@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP37

View Related Documents

Title: Air Quality Designations and Classifications for the 2008 Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards

Abstract: This action will establish the air quality designations for all areas of the United States under the revised 2008 ozone NAAQS. Designations of attainment, nonattainment, or unclassifiable are based upon air quality monitoring data and other relevant information pertaining to the air quality in the affected area, including whether an area contributes to a violation of the standard in a nearby area. The original deadline for this action was March 12, 2010. On January 6, 2010, EPA announced it had extended the designations deadline by one year, until March 12, 2011, pending ongoing reconsideration of the 2008 NAAQS. EPA has now completed reconsideration of the 2008 NAAQS, and since it has not been revised or replaced, EPA now intends to complete the ozone designations for the 2008 standard by mid-2012.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 81 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: sec 107(d); sec 172(a); sec 181(a) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Action 07/00/2012

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0476

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No Agency Contact: Carla Oldham Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
C539-04 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-3347
FAX: 919 541-0824E-Mail: oldham.carla@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Rhea Jones Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
C539-04 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-2940
FAX: 919 541-5489
E-Mail: jones.rhea@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP52

View Related Documents

Title: National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From Coal- and Oil-Fired Electric Utility Steam Generating Units and Standards of Performance for Electric Utility Steam Generating Units

Abstract: On May 18, 2005 (70 FR 28606), EPA published a final rule requiring reductions in emissions of mercury from Electric Utility Steam Generating Units. That rule was vacated on February 8, 2008, by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. As a result of that vacatur, coal- and oil-fired electric utility steam generating units remain on the list of sources that must be regulated under section 112 of the Clean Air Act (CAA). The Agency will develop standards under CAA section 112(d), which will reduce hazardous air pollutant (HAP) emissions from this source category. Recent court decisions on other CAA section 112(d) rules will be considered in developing this regulation. The rule was proposed on May 3, 2011 (76 FR 24976). Under this action, EPA also proposed amendments to the criteria pollutant new source performance standards (NSPS) for utilities. On February 27, 2006, EPA promulgated amendments to the utility NSPS and was subsequently sued by multiple state attorney general offices and environmental organizations. On September 2, 2009, EPA was granted a voluntary remand without vacatur of the 2006 amendments. Combining the two rules in a single action provides interested parties the opportunity to provide comments on the combined requirements of the two rules. It also avoids double-counting either costs or environmental benefits of the separate rules.

Priority: Economically Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule

Major: Yes Unfunded Mandates: State, Local, Or Tribal Governments;
Private Sector

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63; 40 CFR 60, subpart Da (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: Clean Air Act sec 112(d); Clean Air Act sec 111(b) Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

NPRM Judicial No later than March 16, 2011, EPA shall sign for publication in the Federal Register a notice of proposed rulemaking. 03/16/2011

Other Judicial No later than December 16, 2011, EPA shall sign for publication in the Federal Register a notice of final rulemaking. 12/16/2011

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: Section 112(n)(1)(A) of the Clean Air Act required EPA to conduct a study of the hazards to public health resulting from emissions of hazardous air pollutants from electric utility steam generating units and, after considering the results of that study, determine whether it was appropriate and necessary to regulate such units under section 112. The study wascompleted in 1998, and, in December 2000, EPA determined that it was appropriate and necessary to regulate coal- and oilfired electric utility steam generating units and added such units to the list of sources for which standards must be developed under section 112. The February 8, 2008, vacatur of the May 18, 2005, Clean Air Mercury Rule and March 29, 2005, section 112(n) revision rule (which had removed such sources from the list) resulted in the requirement to regulate under section 112 being reinstated.

Legal Basis: Clean Air Act, section 112

Alternatives: Not yet determined.

Costs and Benefits: EPA estimates that this final rule will yield annual monetized benefits (in 2007$) of between $37 to $90 billion using a 3 percent discount rate and $33 to $81 billion using a 7 percent discount rate. The great majority of the estimates are attributable to co-benefits from 4,200 to 11,000 fewer PM2.5-related premature mortalities. The monetized benefits from reductions in mercury emissions, calculated only for children exposed to recreationally caught freshwater fish, are expected to be $0.004 to $0.006 billion in 2016 using a 3 percent discount rate and $0.0005 to $0.001 billion using a 7 percent discount rate. The annual social costs, approximated by the compliance costs, are $9.6 billion (2007$) and the annual monetized net benefits are $27 to $80 billion using 3 percent discount rate or $24 to $71 billion using a 7 percent discount rate. The benefits outweigh costs by between 3 to 1 or 9 to 1 depending on the benefit estimate and discount rate used.

Risks: Not yet determined.

Timetable:Action Date FR Cite
Public Hearing Notice 04/28/2011 76 FR 23768

NPRM 05/03/2011 76 FR 24976

NPRM Comment Period Extended 07/01/2011 76 FR 38590

Final Action 12/00/2011

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM - http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=EPA-HQ-OAR2009-0234-2910; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0234, EPA-HQ-OAR-2005-0031

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Business;
Governmental Jurisdictions Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State; Tribal

Federalism: Yes Energy Affected: Yes

Sectors Affected: 221112 Agency Contact: Bill Maxwell Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
D243-01 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5430
FAX: 919 541-5450
E-Mail: maxwell.bill@epa.gov Agency Contact: Robert J Wayland Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
D243-01 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-1045
FAX: 919 541-5450
E-Mail: wayland.robertj@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP54

View Related Documents

Title: Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Listing of Substitutes for Ozone-Depleting Substances-Hydrocarbon Refrigerants

Abstract: This action proposed to list a number of hydrocarbon refrigerants as substitutes to ozone depleting substances for certain household and commercial uses under EPA's Significant New Alternatives Policy (SNAP) Program. The SNAP Program evaluates alternatives to ozone-depleting substances to ensure that they do not increase overall risks to human health and the environment and lists these substitutes as acceptable, acceptable subject to use conditions, acceptable with narrowed use limits, or unacceptable. This action proposed to find a number of hydrocarbons acceptable subject to use conditions, including enforceable use conditions to ensure the safe use of hydrocarbons as refrigerants. This rule is anticipated to give appliance manufacturers more options with less overall environmental and health impact than current refrigerants.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 82 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7414; 42 USC 7601; 42 USC 7671 to 7671q Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 05/10/2010 75 FR 25799

Final Action 12/00/2011

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM -http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=0900006480aea2df; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQOAR-2009-0286

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/ozone/snap/

Sectors Affected: 333415; 335222 Agency Contact: Margaret Sheppard Environmental Protection AgencyAir and Radiation
6205J Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9163
FAX: 202 343-2338
E-Mail: sheppard.margaret@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP57

View Related Documents

Title: Transportation Conformity Rule Restructuring Amendments

Abstract: The transportation conformity rule ensures that transportation planning is consistent with a State's plan for achieving air quality standards. These amendments will update the rule to apply existing conformity requirements to future NAAQS such that the need for future rulemakings merely to address conformity for a new or revised NAAQS will be minimized.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 5, 93 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: CAA 176(c); 42 USC 7506(c) Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

Other Statutory New Ozone areas need rule by 6/2010 to make 1st conformity determinat'n by CAA deadline, 1 yr from effective date of designat'ns. 06/11/2010

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 08/13/2010 75 FR 49435

Final Action 12/00/2011

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM - http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2010/pdf/2010-19928.pdf; EPA
Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0128

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/otaq/stateresources/transconf/index.htm

Sectors Affected: 92 Agency Contact: Patty Klavon Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
AASMCG Ann Arbor , MI 48105
Phone: 734 214-4476
E-Mail: Klavon.Patty@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Laura Berry Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
AASMCG Ann Arbor , MI 48105
Phone: 734 214-4858
E-Mail: Berry.Laura@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP76

View Related Documents

Title: Oil and Natural Gas Sector--New Source Performance Standards and National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air

Pollutants

Abstract: New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) regulate criteria pollutants from new stationary sources. Two NSPS (subparts KKK and LLL) for the oil and natural gas industry were promulgated in 1985. Section 111 of the Clean Air Act (CAA) requires that NSPS be reviewed every 8 years and revised as appropriate. National Emission Standards for Hazardous AirPollutants (NESHAP) regulate hazardous air pollutants (HAP) from new and existing stationary sources. Two NESHAP (subparts HH and HHH) for the oil and natural gas industry were promulgated in 1999. Section 112 of the CAA requires that NESHAP be reviewed every 8 years and revised as appropriate. In addition, section 112(f) requires that each category regulated under section 112(d) be reviewed to ensure that such regulations provide for an ample margin of safety to protect public health (i.e., address "residual risk" for each category). This action will include the required reviews under sections 111 and 112. Because the existing regulations are narrow in scope, the reviews will include consideration of broadening the scope of operations and emission points covered by the NSPS and MACT.

Priority: Economically Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: Undetermined Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60; 40 CFR 63 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7411; 42 USC 7412 Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

NPRM Judicial Consent Decree entered 02/04/2010, 3-month extension granted 1/11/11, new 3-month extension granted on 4/18/2011 07/28/2011

Other Judicial Consent Decree deadline 04/03/2012

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: Not yet determined.

Legal Basis: Not yet determined.

Alternatives: Not yet determined.

Costs and Benefits: For the NSPS, the annual costs are estimated at $738 million. After taking into account the value of the natural gas and condensate recovered, there would be a net savings of $45 million annually. For the NESHAP, the annual costs of compliance will be $16 million. EPA estimates benefits for the VOCs 540,000 tons per year, or about 25 percent reduction overall; for methane, 3.4 million tpy, which is equal to 65 million metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e), which is a reduction of about 26 percent; and for air toxics, 38,000 tons, or a reduction of nearly 30 percent.

Risks: Not yet determined.

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite
Notice--Public Meeting 08/26/2011 76 FR 53371

NPRM 08/23/2011 76 FR 52738

Final Action 03/00/2012

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM - http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=EPA-HQ-OAR2010-0505-0002; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0505

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: Undetermined

RIN Information URL: http://epa.gov/airquality/oilandgas/ Agency Contact: Bruce Moore Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
E143-01 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5460
FAX: 919 541-0246
E-Mail: moore.bruce@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: David Cozzie Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation 1200 Pennsylvania Ave, NW Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 919 541-5356
E-Mail: cozzie.david@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP80

View Related Documents

Title: Reconsideration of the Prevention of Significant Deterioration and Nonattainment New Source Review (NSR):Aggregation

Abstract: This final reconsideration will address a range of legal and policy issues related to the Aggregation rule and complete any revisions of the rule that become necessary as a result of the reconsideration process. EPA developed and issued a final rule that addressed when a source must combine (i.e., "aggregate") nominally-separate physical and operational changes for the purpose of determining whether they are a single change and subject to review under the New Source Review (NSR) program. Following promulgation of the NSR Aggregation final rule on 1/15/09, the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) submitted a petition for reconsideration as provided for in CAA. In response to NRDC's petition, EPA has both announced the convening of a reconsideration proceeding and administratively stayed the effective date of the rule to allow time
to conduct the reconsideration.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51.165; 40 CFR 51.166; 40 CFR 52.21 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 04/15/2010 75 FR 19567
Final Action - Delay of Effective Date 05/18/2010 75 FR 27643

Extension of Comment Period 05/14/2010 75 FR 27191

Final Action 04/00/2012

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM - http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=0900006480ad8130; Split from RIN 2060-AP49. Split from RIN 2060-AL75; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2003-0064

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State; Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/nsr/

Sectors Affected: 325181; 325188; 325998; 336399; 331311; 336111; 325414; 325182; 221121; 221122; 221112; 336312; 33612; 221111; 325413; 32512; 336112; 325411; 336992; 336213; 336211; 33634; 33633; 33635; 22121; 211112; 322122; 221113; 221119; 336322; 322121; 32411; 325412; 48621; 336212 Agency Contact: Dave Svendsgaard Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
C504-03 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-2380
FAX: 919 541-5509
E-Mail: svendsgaard.dave@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Raj Rao Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
C504-03 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5344
FAX: 919 541-5509
E-Mail: rao.raj@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ10

View Related Documents

Title: Review of New Source Performance Standards for Nitric Acid Plants--Subpart G

Abstract: Section 111(b)(1)(B) of the Clean Air act mandates that EPA review and if appropriate revise existing New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) at least every 8 years. This NSPS was initially promulgated in 1971. This NSPS was reviewed in 1979 and 1984. On January 2010, consent decree was entered into US District Court between EPA and several environmental groups. This action will review and if appropriate revise the existing NSPS.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations )Legal Authority: CAA sec 111 Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

NPRM Judicial 09/30/2011

Other Judicial 03/30/2012

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 10/14/2011 76 FR 63878

NPRM Comment Period End 11/28/2011

Final Action 03/00/2012

Additional Information: SAN No. 5416

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No Agency Contact: Bill Neuffer Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
D243-02 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5435
FAX: 919 541-3207
E-Mail: neuffer.bill@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Tina Ndoh Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
D205-02 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-2750
FAX: 919 541-5600
E-Mail: ndoh.christina@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ36

View Related Documents

Title: Supplemental Determinations for Renewable Fuels Produced Under the Final RFS2 Program From Palm Oil

Abstract: As indicated in the final rule for the Renewable Fuels Standard Program, while the Agency issued lifecycle greenhouse gas (GHG) threshold determinations for the major fuel pathways projected to meet the bulk of the RFS volume mandates, assessments of other new fuel pathways such as biofuels produced from palm oil, could not be completed in time for the final rule. In the process of assessing these fuels, the Agency is issuing determinations through several supplemental
notices to the final rule.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 86, 40 CFR 80 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: Clean Air Act 211(o) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NODA 12/00/2011

Direct Final Action 03/00/2012

Additional Information: Split from RIN 2060-AO81; EPA Docket information: EPA–HQ– OAR–2005–0161

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Federalism: No Energy Affected: No International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise be of
international interest.

RIN InformationURL: http://www.epa.gov/otaq/fuels/renewablefuels/index.htm

Sectors Affected: 324110 Agency Contact: Paul Argyropoulos Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
6401A Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-1123
E-Mail: argyropoulos.paul@epa.gov Agency Contact: Robert Larson Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
AAFC Ann Arbor , MI 48105
Phone: 734 214-4277
E-Mail: larson.robert@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ39

View Related Documents

Title: Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Extension of Global Laboratory and Analytical Use Exemption for Essential Class I Ozone Depleting Substances

Abstract: This rule would extend the global laboratory and analytical use exemption for the production and import of Class I ozone depleting substances through December 31, 2014. This exemption currently expires December 31, 2011. This action is consistent with recent actions by the Parties to the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 82 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: CAA sec 604; 42 USC 7414, 7601, 7671 to 7671(q) Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

Other Statutory Date when current exemption expires 12/31/2011

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 07/15/2011 76 FR 41747

Final Action 12/15/2011 76 FR 77909

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM - http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=EPA-HQ-OAR2010-0672-0001; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0672

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise be of
international interest.

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/ozone/title6/exemptions/laboratory.html

Sectors Affected: 325120; 325412; 541380 Agency Contact: Jeremy Arling Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
6205J Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9055
FAX: 202 343-2338
E-Mail: Arling.Jeremy@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ51

View Related DocumentsTitle: Performance Specification 4C--Specifications and Test Procedures for Low-level Carbon Monoxide Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems in Stationary Sources

Abstract: This performance specification (PS) would be used to evaluate the acceptability of low-level carbon monoxide (CO) continuous emission monitoring systems (CEMS). Our existing performance specifications for CO (PS 4, 4A, and 4B) are unable to accommodate low CO levels. This performance specification would be necessary to evaluate CEMS used to monitor low CO limits that may be specified in regulations for boilers and incinerators.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: Clean Air Act Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Direct Final Action 11/00/2012

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No Agency Contact: Lula Melton Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
E143-02 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-2910
FAX: 919 541-4511
E-Mail: melton.lula@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ65

View Related Documents

Title: Reasonable Further Progress Requirements for the 1997 8-Hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard

Abstract: This final will revise the rules for implementing the 8-hour ozone NAAQS to address the requirement for

nonattainment areas to achieve continued emissions reductions until the area attains the ozone standards. The rules revise and clarify the situations for which emissions reductions from sources located outside the nonattainment area may be credited toward meeting the requirement for achieving reasonable further progress in emissions reductions.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51; 40 CFR 50 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7409; 42 USC 7410; 42 USC 7511 to 7511f; 42 USC 7601(a)(1) Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

NPRM Statutory Promise to the Court -- Stay of litigation agreed to contingent upon NPRM signed by 12/31. NRDC v. EPA, D.C. Cir., 09-1256. 12/15/2010

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 12/22/2010 75 FR 80420

Final Action 03/00/2012

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM - http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail; Split from RIN 2060-AP24; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0885

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No Agency Contact: Lynn Dail Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
C539-01 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711Phone: 919 541-2363
FAX: 919 541-0824
E-Mail: dail.lynn@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Rich Damberg Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
C539-01 Research Triangle Park , NC 20460
Phone: 919 541-5592
FAX: 919 541-0824
E-Mail: damberg.rich@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ83

View Related Documents

Title: Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: The 2012 Critical Use Exemption From the Phaseout of Methyl Bromide

Abstract: Methyl bromide was phased out under the Clean Air Act and the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer in 2005, except for limited exemptions. This action would authorize uses for the 2012 critical use exemption from the phaseout of methyl bromide, and would also authorize the amount of methyl bromide that may be produced, imported, or supplied from inventory for those uses in 2012. Absent this rulemaking, production and import of methyl bromide for critical uses would be zero for 2012. EPA takes this action under the authority of the Clean Air Act to reflect recent consensus Decisions taken by the Parties to the Montreal Protocol at the 22nd Meeting of the Parties.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 82 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7671(c)(d)(6) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 10/20/2011 76 FR 65139

NPRM Comment Period End 11/21/2011

Final Action 03/00/2012

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA–HQ–OAR–2009–0277

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise be of
international interest.

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/ozone/mbr

Sectors Affected: 493130; 311211; 1113; 493110; 1114; 325320; 115114; 311212; 115112; 1112 Agency Contact: Jeremy Arling Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
6205J Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9055
FAX: 202 343-2338
E-Mail: Arling.Jeremy@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AR03

View Related Documents

Title: Transportation Conformity Rule: MOVES Regional Grace Period Extension

Abstract: This rulemaking provides an extension to the current grace period before the Motor Vehicle Emission Simulator (MOVES) model is required for use in regional conformity analyses. In December 2009, EPA released the MOVES emissions model. Under the current conformity rule, new conformity analyses after March 2012 must be based on MOVES, but this will be difficult or impossible for some areas to meet. State and local governments need additional time to incorporate MOVES into theirplanning without negative conformity consequences. Transportation conformity is a Clean Air Act requirement that transportation activities be consistent with a State's plan for achieving EPA's national ambient air quality standards.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51 and 93 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: CAA 176(c) (42 USC 7506(c)) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Direct Final Action 10/13/2011 76 FR 63554

NPRM 10/13/2011 76 FR 63575

NPRM Comment Period End 11/14/2011

Withdrawal of Direct Final Action 12/05/2011 76 FR 75797

Final Action 02/00/2012

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; State; Local

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/otaq/stateresources/transconf/index.htm Agency Contact: Meg Patulski Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
AASMCG Ann Arbor , MI 48105
Phone: 734 214-4842
E-Mail: patulski.meg@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Astrid Larsen Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
AASMCG Ann Arbor , MI 48105
Phone: 734 214-4812
E-Mail: larsen.astrid@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AR06

View Related Documents

Title: Air Quality Designations for the 2010 Nitrogen Dioxide National Ambient Air Quality Standards

Abstract: This final action will establish initial air quality designations for all areas of the United States under the revised 2010 NO2 National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). Designations of attainment, nonattainment, or unclassifiable are based on air quality monitoring data and other relevant information pertaining to the air quality in the affected area, including whether an area contributes to a violation of the standard in a nearby area. EPA is required to make the final initial designations no later than 2 years from the January 22, 2010 promulgation of the revised NAAQS.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 81 (revision) (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7407(d) Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

Other Statutory EPA is required to make the final initial designations NLT 2 yrs. from 1/22/2010 promulgation of the rev. NAAQS. 01/12/2012

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Action 12/00/2011

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-0572

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State; Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: NoEnergy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: www.epa.gov/air/nitrogenoxides/designations Agency Contact: Douglas Solomon Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
C539-04 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-4132
FAX: 919 541-0684
E-Mail: solomon.douglas@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Rhea Jones Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
C539-04 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-2940
FAX: 919 541-5489
E-Mail: jones.rhea@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AR18

View Related Documents

Title: Air Quality Designations for the 2010 Sulfur Dioxide Primary National Ambient Air Quality Standard

Abstract: This final action will establish initial air quality designations for all areas of the United States under the revised 2010 SO2 Primary NAAQS. Designations of attainment, nonattainment or unclassifiable are based on air quality monitoring data, air quality modeling data, and other relevant information pertaining to the air quality in the affected area, including whether an area contributes to a violation of the standard in a nearby area. EPA is required to make the final initial designations no later than 2 years from the June 3, 2010 promulgation of the revised NAAQS.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 81 (revision) (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7407(d) Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

Other Statutory 2 yrs. from 6/3/2010 promulgation of the revised SO2 NAAQS 06/03/2012

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Action 06/00/2012

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No Agency Contact: Douglas Solomon Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
C539-04 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-4132
FAX: 919 541-0684
E-Mail: solomon.douglas@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Rhea Jones Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
C539-04 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-2940
FAX: 919 541-5489
E-Mail: jones.rhea@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AR22View Related Documents

Title: Revisions to Federal Implementation Plans to Reduce Interstate Transport of Fine Particulate Matter and Ozone

Abstract: On August 8, 2011, EPA published in the Federal Register the final Federal Implementation Plans to Reduce Interstate Transport of Fine Particulate Matter (76 FR 48208). This rule uses a cap and trade approach to reduce sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides emissions and replaces the Clean Air Interstate Rule, which was promulgated in 2005 and remanded to EPA in 2008 by the US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit. This proposal would correct unit-level discrepancies in some state emission budgets and new unit set-asides; amend the effective date of the assurance provisions from 2012 until 2014; and align
allocations to units under consent decrees.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 52; 40 CFR 97 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 10/14/2011 76 FR 63860

NPRM Comment Period End 11/28/2011

Final Action 01/00/2012

Additional Information: Split from RIN 2060-AR01. Split from RIN 2060-AP50; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-

0491

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.epa.gov/crossstaterule

Sectors Affected: 221112 Agency Contact: Gabrielle Stevens Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
6204J Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9252
E-Mail: stevens.gabrielle@epa.gov Agency Contact: Meg Victor Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
6204J Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9193
E-Mail: victor.meg@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AI62

View Related Documents

Title: National Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) Emission Standards for Consumer Products; Amendments

Abstract: This action consists of amendments to the consumer products part 59 Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) rule under Clean Air Act section 183(e). The amendments are being undertaken to address Clean Air Act Advisory Committee recommendation AQM2.3, which called for aligning the consumer products (CP) rule with the model rule adopted by the Ozone Transport Commission.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 59 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7511(b) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Action 00/00/0000

NPRM 00/00/0000Additional Information: SAN No. 4309

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State; Tribal

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 32599 Agency Contact: Keith Barnett Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation 1200 Pennsylvania Ave Research Triangle Park , NC 20460
Phone: 919 541-5605
FAX: 919 541-3720
E-Mail: barnett.keith@epa.gov Agency Contact: Robin Dunkins Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
E143-03 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5335
FAX: 919 541-3470

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AK73

View Related Documents

Title: National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Stationary Combustion Turbines--Petition to Delist

Abstract: In August 2002, the Agency received a petition to remove certain types of stationary gas-fired combustion turbines from the list of hazardous air pollutant sources under section 112(c) of the Clean Air Act. After requesting additional data from the petitioner regarding their petition and reviewing the additional data, the Agency proposed a partial granting of the petition by proposing to delist 4 subcategories of stationary gas-fired turbines in April 2004. Simultaneously, the Agency proposed a stay of the effectiveness of the combustion turbine maximum achievable control technology (MACT) for new sources in those subcategories of turbines, delaying the imposition of control requirements for the proposed delisted new turbines until a final action is taken regarding the delisting. The petition to delist is based on a determination that the lifetime risk of cancer from exposure to the HAP emissions is below one in one million and the emissions of noncarcinogenic HAPs do not exceed a level which is adequate to protect the public health with an ample margin of safety (i.e., do not exceed a hazard index of 1.0); consequently, the Agency is waiting until the completion of the final Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) assessment for formaldehyde before taking final action on the petition. The formaldehyde IRIS assessment is currently undergoing external peer review and the Office of Research and Development has not determined when the final IRIS action on formaldehyde is expected to occur.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: Undetermined Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite
NPRM--Delisting 04/07/2004 69 FR 18327

NPRM--STAY 04/07/2004 69 FR 18338

Final Action--STAY 08/18/2004 69 FR 51184

Final Action 11/00/2013

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM-STAY - http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-AIR/2004/April/Day07/a7775.htm; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2003-0196

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: Undetermined Energy Affected: Undetermined

Sectors Affected: 3336; 221112 Agency Contact: Melanie King Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
D243-01Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-2469
E-Mail: king.melanie@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Robert Wayland Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
D243-01 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-1045
FAX: 919 541-5450
E-Mail: Wayland.RobertJ@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AL94

View Related Documents

Title: Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Process for Exempting Emergency Uses of Methyl Bromide

Abstract: Under the Clean Air Act and the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer, this rule would seek to create an exemption for emergency uses of methyl bromide, an ozone depleting substance. This exemption will be limited to no more than 20 metric tons per emergency event. This rule would define what qualifies as an emergency use.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 82 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7671 to 7671(q) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Action 00/00/0000

NPRM 00/00/0000

Additional Information: SAN No. 4819

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise be of
international interest.

RIN Information URL: www.epa.gov/ozone/mbr

Sectors Affected: 111; 56171; 42469; 32532; 115 Agency Contact: Jeremy Arling Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
6205J Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9055
FAX: 202 343-2338
E-Mail: Arling.Jeremy@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AM49

View Related Documents

Title: Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Certification of Recovery and Recovery/Recycling Equipment Intended for Use With Substitute Refrigerants

Abstract: Using authority under section 608 of the Clean Air Act, EPA has established a certification program for refrigerant recovery and recycling equipment. Recovery equipment is specific to the refrigerant and as alternative refrigerants enter the market, new equipment to capture those refrigerants also enter the market. This action would amend the existing provisions to reflect that new equipment.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: NoCFR Citation: 40 CFR 82 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7414; 42 USC 7601; 42 USC 7671 to 7671q Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 00/00/0000

Additional Information: SAN No. 4916

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Federal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.epa.gov/ozone/title6/608 Agency Contact: Sally Hamlin Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
6205J Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9711
FAX: 202 343-2362
E-Mail: hamlin.sally@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AM55

View Related Documents

Title: Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Modifications to the Technician Certification Requirements Under Section 608 of the
Clean Air Act

Abstract: This rule would amend appendix D to subpart F of 40 CFR part 82--Standards for Becoming a Certifying Program for Technicians. The Refrigerant Recycling Regulations governing standards for certifying programs for technicians were promulgated under section 608 of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 in 1994. This rule would update parts of the regulations concerning the technician certification examination to reflect developments in new refrigerants, equipment, and technology. This rule would provide specific requirements for programs applying to become certifying organizations, would specify reporting and recordkeeping requirements in order to enhance implementation of the program, and would define other administrative components of the program to improve accountability.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 82 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7414; 42 USC 7601; 42 USC 7671 to 7671q Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 00/00/0000

Additional Information: SAN No. 4901

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/ozone/title6/608/index.html

Sectors Affected: 3334 Agency Contact: Sally Hamlin Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
6205J Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9711
FAX: 202 343-2362
E-Mail: hamlin.sally@epamail.epa.govEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AN43

View Related Documents

Title: Federal Plan Requirements for Other Solid Waste Incineration Units Constructed on or Before December 9, 2004

Abstract: In this Other Solid Waste Incineration (OSWI) Federal plan rulemaking, EPA becomes an implementing authority in those instances where the State or local agency has failed to submit a plan or a plan has not yet been approved. Therefore, consistent with section 129(b)(3) of the Act, this rulemaking would impose a Federal plan that applies to OSWI in any State, tribe, or locale that has not submitted an approvable plan within the time allotted. This action makes no changes to the requirements in the December 2005 rule, and is intended to fulfill EPA’s duty under section 129(b)(3) to promulgate a Federal plan as a gap-filling measure until the State fulfills its statutory obligations. When the State submits an approvable State Plan, the Federal plan will no longer apply to units in that State.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 62 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: CAA sec 129; CAA sec 111(d) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Action 00/00/0000

NPRM 12/18/2006 71 FR 75816

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM - http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-WASTE/2006/December/Day18/f21285.htm; Legal Deadline continued: Federal Plan must be promulgated 2 years after the final publication of the Emission Guidelines rule (December 16, 2005, 70 FR 74869, http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-AIR/2005/December/Day-16/a23716.htm);
EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2006-0364

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State; Tribal

Small Entities Affected: Business; Governmental Jurisdictions Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 562213 Agency Contact: Charlene Spells Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
E-143-05 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5255
FAX: 919 541-3470
E-Mail: spells.charlene@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AN72

View Related Documents

Title: Petroleum Refineries--New Source Performance Standards (NSPS)--Subparts J and Ja

Abstract: On June 24, 2008, EPA promulgated amendments to the Standards of Performance for Petroleum Refineries and new standards for process units constructed, reconstructed, or modified after May 14, 2007. EPA received three petitions for reconsideration of the final rule. On September 26, 2008, EPA granted reconsideration and issued a stay for the issues raised in the petitions regarding process heaters and flares. In December 2008 we proposed amendments to address these issues. Under this action, EPA will finalize these amendments.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7411 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Reconsideration—Final 00/00/0000NPRM 05/14/2007 72 FR 27178

NPRM Comment Period Extended 06/28/2007 72 FR 35375

NPRM Comment Period End 07/13/2007

NPRM Comment Period Extended To 08/27/2007

Final Rule 06/24/2008 73 FR 35838

Reconsideration—NPRM 12/22/2008 73 FR 78546

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM - http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-AIR/2007/May/Day14/a8547.htm; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0011

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 32411 Agency Contact: Brenda Shine Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
E143-01 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-3608
FAX: 919 541-0246
E-Mail: shine.brenda@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Penny Lassiter Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
E1430-01 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5396
FAX: 919 541-0246
E-Mail: lassiter.penny@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AN93

View Related Documents

Title: Improving Implementation of the Operating Permit Rules in Response to CAAA Committee Recommendations

Abstract: This action addresses potential improvements to the regulations implementing the Clean Air Act's title V operating permits program. Under the title V program, each facility that is a major source of specified air pollutants is required to obtain a permit that describes allowable emissions and other conditions. The improvements to the program were among those recommended to EPA by a 18-member Task Force formed by the Clean Air Act Advisory Committee, with representatives from industry, environmental groups, and state and local agencies.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 70; 40 CFR 71 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: Clean Air Act Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 00/00/0000

Additional Information: Includes Retrospective Review under EO13563.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State; Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: www.epa.gov/air/oaqps/permits/index.html Agency Contact: Jennifer Snyder Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
C504-05 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-3003
FAX: 919 541-5509E-Mail: Snyder.Jennifer@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Juan Santiago Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
C504-05 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-1084
FAX: 919-541-5509
E-Mail: santiago.juan@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AO47

View Related Documents

Title: Review of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particulate Matter

Abstract: Under the Clean Air Act, EPA is required to review and, if appropriate, revise the air quality criteria for the primary (health-based) and secondary (welfare-based) national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) every 5 years. On October 17, 2006, EPA published a final rule to revise the primary and secondary NAAQS for particulate matter to provide increased protection of public health and welfare. With regard to the primary standards for fine particles (PM2.5, generally referring to particles with an aerodynamic diameter less than or equal to 2.5 micrometers, μm), EPA revised the level of the 24-hour PM2.5 standard to 35 micrograms per cubic meter (μg/m3) and retained the level of the annual PM2.5 standard at 15 μg/m3. With regard to the primary standards for coarse particles (PM10, generally referring to particles with an aerodynamic diameter less than or equal to 10 μm), EPA retained the 24-hour PM10 standard and revoked the annual PM10 standard. With regard to the secondary PM standards, EPA made them identical in all respects to the primary PM standards, as revised. EPA initiated the current review in 2007 with a workshop to discuss key policy-relevant issues around which EPA would structure the review. This review includes the preparation of an Integrated Science Assessment (ISA), Risk/Exposure Assessments (REAs), and a Policy Assessment (PA) by EPA, with opportunities for review by EPA's Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee (CASAC) and the public. These documents inform the Administrator's decision as to whether to retain or revise the standards. The ISA was completed in December 2009, the final REAs for human health risk assessment and visibility assessment were finalized in June and July 2010, respectively, and the PA was finalized in April 2011.

Priority: Economically Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: Yes Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 50, 53, and 58 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7408; 42 USC 7409 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Action 00/00/0000

NPRM 00/00/0000

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0492

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State; Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.epa.gov/air/particlepollution/ Agency Contact: Beth Hassett-Sipple Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
C504-06 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-4605
FAX: 919 541-0237
E-Mail: hassett-sipple.beth@epa.gov Agency Contact: Karen Martin Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
C504-06 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5274
FAX: 919 541-0237
E-Mail: Martin.Karen@epamail.epa.govEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AO60

View Related Documents

Title: New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) Review Under CAA Section 111(b)(1)(B)

Abstract: The goal of EPA's New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) Review under CAA section 111(b)(1)(B) is to address our obligation to review and revise each NSPS at a minimum of every 8 years. The review will outline criteria that the Agency believes indicate that a standard remains effective and need not be reviewed. The strategy also seeks to minimize the administrative burden of the NSPS program by initially addressing those NSPS that remain effective based on "readily available
information" and do not need to be revised.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7411; 42 USC 7429 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Next Action Undetermined

ANPRM 10/24/2011 76 FR 65653

ANPRM Comment Period End 11/23/2011

Additional Information: SAN No. 5168

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Federalism: No Energy Affected: Undetermined Agency Contact: Janice Godfrey Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
D205-02 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-3391
FAX: 919 541-5600
E-Mail: godfrey.janice@epa.gov Agency Contact: Lisa Conner Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
D205-02 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5060
E-Mail: conner.lisa@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AO68

View Related Documents

Title: Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Labeling of Products Using HCFCs

Abstract: In accordance with section 611 of the Clean Air Act, this action would require a warning statement on containers or products made with or containing a Class II ozone depleting substance (ODS). EPA promulgated a similar rule in 1993 for containers or products made with or containing Class I ODS. Such rules may help consumers and others make more informed choices about using products which damage the stratospheric ozone layer, resulting in increased skin damage and cancers.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 82 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7601; 42 USC 7671j Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 00/00/0000Additional Information: SAN No. 5151

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Federal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise be of
international interest.

RIN Information URL: www.epa.gov/ozone/title6/labeling

Sectors Affected: 333415; 4431; 335222; 33341 Agency Contact: Jeremy Arling Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
6205J Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9055
FAX: 202 343-2338
E-Mail: Arling.Jeremy@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AO75

View Related Documents

Title: Protection of the Stratospheric Ozone: Motor Vehicle Air Conditioning System Servicing

Abstract: The motor vehicle air conditioning industry is considering moving to alternative refrigerants. This action would establish service, maintenance, and equipment provisions, as required by the Clean Air Act, for new alternative refrigerants in the motor vehicle air conditioning sector. These provisions will help ensure the safe and effective servicing of motor vehicle air conditioning systems.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 82 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7671 to 7671q Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 00/00/0000

Additional Information: SAN No. 5206

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/ozone/snap

Sectors Affected: 44131; 811111; 44111 Agency Contact: Yaidi Cancel Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
6205J Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9512
FAX: 202 343-2338
E-Mail: cancel.yaidi@epa.gov Agency Contact: Cindy Newberg Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
6205J Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9729
FAX: 202 343-2363
E-Mail: Newberg.Cindy@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP06View Related Documents

Title: New Source Performance Standards for Grain Elevators--Amendments

Abstract: The New Source Performance Standard for Grain Elevators was promulgated in 1978 with the latest amendments made in 1984. Since that time there have been a number of changes in the technology used for storing and loading/unloading grain at elevators. The rule has seen increased activity of late, due to the increase in ethanol production that has lead to bumper crops of corn being grown, which, in turn, has led to a need for increased grain storage. For these reasons a review and potential change in certain definitions is necessary to ensure the appropriate standards are being applied consistently throughout the industry.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60.300 (revision) (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7411; Clean Air Act sec 111; 15 USC 2005 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 12/00/2012

Final Action 12/00/2013

Additional Information: Includes Retrospective Review under E.O. 13563.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 115114 Agency Contact: Bill Schrock Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
E143-03 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5432
FAX: 919 541-3470
E-Mail: schrock.bill@epa.gov Agency Contact: Robin Dunkins Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
E143-03 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5335
FAX: 919 541-3470

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP21

View Related Documents

Title: Response to Section 126 Petition From Warrick County, Indiana and the Town of Newburgh, Indiana

Abstract: This rulemaking will respond to a petition submitted by Warrick County, Indiana and the Town of Newburgh, Indiana under section 126 of the Clean Air Act. The petition requests that EPA make a finding that a power plant being proposed to be built in Henderson County, Kentucky (Cash Creek) will emit air pollutants that will significantly contribute to nonattainment in, or interfere with maintenance by, Warrick County and Newburgh, Indiana with respect to the national ambient air quality standards for ozone and particulate matter. Based on such a finding, the petition requests that EPA establish emission limitations for the proposed power plant to prevent the significant contribution.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: Clean Air Act, sec 126 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 00/00/0000Additional Information: SAN No. 5268

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No Agency Contact: Gobeail McKinley Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
C539-04 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5246
FAX: 919 685-3700
E-Mail: mckinley.gobeail@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Rhea Jones Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
C539-04 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-2940
FAX: 919 541-5489
E-Mail: jones.rhea@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP22

View Related Documents

Title: Revision to Definition of Volatile Organic Compounds--Exclusion of Methyl Iodide (And Possibly Methyl Bromide)

Abstract: This action proposes to revise EPA's definition of volatile organic compounds (VOC) for purposes of preparing State implementation plans (SIPs) to attain the national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for ozone under title I of the Clean Air Act (CAA). This proposed revision would add methyl iodide to the list of compounds excluded from the definition of VOC on the basis that these compounds make a negligible contribution to tropospheric ozone formation. This action may also propose to add methyl bromide to this list.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51.100 (s) (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7602(s) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Action 00/00/0000

NPRM 00/00/0000

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0350

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Local; State

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 424910; 111333 Agency Contact: Dave Sanders Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
C539-01 Research Triangle Park , NC 27525
Phone: 919 541-3356
FAX: 919 541-0824
E-Mail: sanders.dave@epa.gov Agency Contact: Tom Coda Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
C539-01 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-3037
E-Mail: coda.tom@epa.govEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP38

View Related Documents

Title: Review of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ozone

Abstract: Under the Clean Air Act, EPA is required to review and, if appropriate, revise the air quality criteria for the primary (health-based) and secondary (welfare-based) national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) every 5 years. On March 23, 2008, the EPA published a final rule to revise the primary and secondary NAAQS for ozone to provide increased protection of public health and welfare. With regard to the primary standard for ozone, EPA revised the level of the 8-hour ozone standard to 0.075 ppm. With regard to the secondary ozone standard, EPA made it identical in all respects to the primary ozone standard, as revised. EPA initiated the current review in October 2008 with a workshop to discuss key policy-relevant issues around which EPA would structure the review. This review includes the preparation of an Integrated Science Assessment, Risk/Exposure Assessment, and a Policy Assessment Document by EPA, with opportunities for review by EPA's Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee and the public. These documents inform the Administrator's proposed decision as to whether to

retain or revise the standards.

Priority: Economically Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: Yes Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 50 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7408; 42 USC 7409 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Notice - NODA 04/28/2011 76 FR 23755

NPRM 07/00/2013

Final Action 04/00/2014

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0699

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; State; Local; Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.epa.gov/air/ozone Agency Contact: Susan Stone Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
C504-06 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-1146
FAX: 919 541-0237
E-Mail: stone.susan@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Karen Martin Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
C504-06 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5274
FAX: 919 541-0237
E-Mail: Martin.Karen@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP51

View Related Documents

Title: Response to Section 126 Petition From North Carolina

Abstract: EPA is reconsidering its decision to deny the petition submitted by the State of North Carolina to EPA pursuant to section 126 of the Clean Air Act (CAA). North Carolina submitted a petition on March 18, 2004 alleging that upwind major sources of PM and ozone precursors were contributing significantly to North Carolina's ability to attain or maintain the PM and ozone NAAQS. In 2006, EPA denied North Carolina's petition in conjunction with issuing the CAIR federal implementation plan rule. As a result of a remand of the CAIR, the legal basis for denying the PM part of North Carolina's petition no longer exists. On March 5, 2009 the D.C. Circuit of Appeals granted our motion for voluntary remand of our decision to deny North Carolina's petition.Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: CAA sec 126 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 00/00/0000

Additional Information: SAN No. 5347

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: Undetermined Agency Contact: Tim Smith Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
C539-04 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-4718
FAX: 919 541-5489
E-Mail: smith.tim@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Rhea Jones Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
C539-04 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-2940
FAX: 919 541-5489
E-Mail: jones.rhea@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP60

View Related Documents

Title: Response to Section 126 Petition From Delaware

Abstract: EPA is taking action on a petition submitted by Delaware under section 126 of the Clean Air Act. On December 18, 2008, EPA received Delaware's section 126 petition. In this petition, Delaware seeks emissions reductions from large electric generating units in a number of upwind States in order to reduce the contributions from their emissions to PM2.5 and ozone problems in Delaware.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: sec 126 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 00/00/0000

Additional Information: SAN No. 5353

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No Agency Contact: Tim Smith Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
C539-04 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-4718
FAX: 919 541-5489
E-Mail: smith.tim@epamail.epa.govAgency Contact: Rhea Jones Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
C539-04 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-2940
FAX: 919 541-5489
E-Mail: jones.rhea@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP66

View Related Documents

Title: Alternative Work Practices for Leak Detection and Repair, Amendments

Abstract: On December 22, 2008, EPA published a voluntary alternative work practice for leak detection and repair using a newly developed technology, optical gas imaging. After promulgation of the rule, the Agency received a request for administrative reconsideration from American Petroleum Institute (API) on February 20, 2009. This package will address the

reconsideration issues.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60; 40 CFR 61; 40 CFR 63; 40 CFR 65 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Action 00/00/0000

NPRM 00/00/0000

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2003-0197. Includes Retrospective Review under EO13563.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 325211 Agency Contact: Jodi Howard Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
E143-01 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-4607
FAX: 919 541-0246
E-Mail: Howard.Jodi@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Penny Lassiter Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
E1430-01 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5396
FAX: 919 541-0246
E-Mail: lassiter.penny@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP69

View Related Documents

Title: NESHAP: Brick and Structural Clay Products and Clay Products

Abstract: This rulemaking will establish emission limits for hazardous air pollutants (HF, HCl and metals) emitted from brick and clay ceramics kilns and glazing operations at clay ceramics production facilities. The brick and structural clay products industry primarily includes facilities that manufacture brick, clay, pipe, roof tile, extruded floor and wall tile, and other extruded dimensional clay products from clay, shale, or a combination of the two. The manufacturing of brick and structural clay products involves mining, raw material processing (crushing, grinding, and screening), mixing, forming, cutting or shaping, drying, andfiring. Ceramics are defined as a class of inorganic, nonmetallic solids that are subject to high temperature in manufacture and/or use. The clay ceramics manufacturing source category includes facilities that manufacture traditional ceramics, which include ceramic tile, dinnerware, sanitary ware, pottery, and porcelain. The primary raw material used in the manufacture of these traditional ceramics is clay. The manufacturing of clay ceramics involves raw material processing (crushing, grinding, and screening), mixing, forming, shaping, drying, glazing, and firing.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: Not Yet Determined Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Action 00/00/0000

NPRM 00/00/0000

Additional Information: SAN No. 5367

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Business Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Federalism: No Energy Affected: Undetermined Agency Contact: Jeff Telander Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
D243-02 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5427
FAX: 919 541-5600
E-Mail: Telander.Jeff@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Steve Fruh Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
D243-02 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-2837
FAX: 919 541-4991
E-Mail: fruh.steve@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP79

View Related Documents

Title: Lead Emissions From Piston-Engine Aircraft Using Leaded Aviation Gasoline

Abstract: The purpose of this action is to further respond to a petition submitted by Friends of the Earth (FOE) in 2006. In the petition, FOE requested that EPA find that lead emissions from general aviation aircraft may reasonably be anticipated to endanger public health and welfare and that EPA propose emissions standards under the Clean Air Act for lead from general aviation aircraft. Alternatively, FOE requested that EPA commence a study and investigation of the health and environmental impacts of lead emissions from general aviation aircraft, if EPA believes that insufficient information exists to make such a finding. In 2007 EPA issued a Federal Register notice seeking comment on FOE's petition. The notice asked a series of questions seeking information on exposure to lead emissions from general aviation aircraft, lead emission rates from general aviation aircraft, unleaded aviation fuel options, and engine technology. The ANPRM described the lead inventory related to use of leaded avgas, air quality and exposure information, and additional information the Agency is collecting related to the impact of lead emissions from piston-engine aircraft on air quality and requested comments on this information.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7571 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Next Action Undetermined

ANPRM 04/28/2010 75 FR 22439ANPRM Extension of Comment Period 06/24/2010 75 FR 36034

Additional Information: EPA publication information: ANPRM -http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=0900006480ae298f; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQOAR-2007-0294

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No Agency Contact: Marion Hoyer Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
AAHEBTC Ann Arbor , MI 48105
Phone: 734 214-4513
E-Mail: Hoyer.Marion@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Meredith Pedde Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
AAHEBTC Ann Arbor , MI 48105
Phone: 734 214-4748
E-Mail: Pedde.Meredith@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP94

View Related Documents

Title: National VOC Emission Standards for Architectural Coatings; Amendments

Abstract: This action amends the existing Architectural Coatings Rule at 40 CFR part 59, subpart D to update the categories and limits to make them consistent with the Ozone Transport Commission model rule. This action is being done in response to a Clean Air Act Advisory Committee recommendation. This action was originally combined with similar amendments for consumer and commercial products under the "National VOC Emission Standards for Consumer Products; Amendments" (RIN 2060-AI62). However, it has now been determined that the other source categories in 2060-AI62 will be delayed due to the need for further analysis, and EPA has decided to separate out the Architectural Coatings piece as a separate rulemaking.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 59 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7511b Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 00/00/0000

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 3255 Agency Contact: Keith Barnett Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
E143-03 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5605
FAX: 919 541-3470
E-Mail: barnett.keith@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP98

View Related Documents

Title: Reconsideration of the 2008 Ozone Primary and Secondary National Ambient Air Quality StandardsAbstract: EPA is continuing with its statutorily mandated periodic review of the 2008 ozone NAAQS. In that ongoing review, which as noted above is well underway, EPA will consider the current state of the science, which will include the new science not considered as part of the 2008 rule, as well as the science taken into account in previous reviews. Given that, EPA intends to conclude its rulemaking on reconsideration of the 2008 ozone NAAQS in conjunction with its ongoing review of the ozone NAAQS. This will allow EPA's final decision on the reconsideration rulemaking to be coordinated with the Agency's decision on the ozone NAAQS resulting from the ongoing periodic review.

Priority: Economically Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: Yes Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 50; 40 CFR 58 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7409 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Action 00/00/0000

NPRM 01/19/2010 75 FR 2938

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM - http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=0900006480a7f618; Related to RIN 2060-AN24; EPA
Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2005-0172

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State; Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/air/ozonepollution/

Related RINs: Related to 2060-AN24 Agency Contact: Susan Stone Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
C504-06 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-1146
FAX: 919 541-0237
E-Mail: stone.susan@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Karen Martin Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
C504-06 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5274
FAX: 919 541-0237
E-Mail: Martin.Karen@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ23

View Related Documents

Title: Method 16C for the Determination of Total Reduced Sulfur Emissions From Stationary Sources

Abstract: Method 16C is used to determine total reduced sulfur emissions and is being proposed as an alternative to Methods 16, 16A, and 16B for regulated facilities in kraft pulp mills (subpart BB of 40 CFR 60) and other industries that emit these compounds. Method 16C combines the sample oxidation technology of Method 16A with the instrumental technology of Method 6C to provide a user-friendly, real-time procedure. The Agency has allowed its use in the past on a case-by-case basis and now believes it should be made available for general use. This method is not required under any rule and does not add any new testing requirement to the current regulations.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51; 40 CFR 60; 40 CFR 61; 40 CFR 63 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 to 7601 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR CiteFinal Action 00/00/0000

NPRM 09/02/2010 75 FR 53908

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM - http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2010/pdf/2010-21954.pdf; EPA
Docket information: EPA–HQ–OAR–2010–0115

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 324110; 322110 Agency Contact: Foston Curtis Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
E143-02 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-1063
FAX: 919 541-0516
E-Mail: curtis.foston@epa.gov Agency Contact: Conniesue Oldham Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
E143-02 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-7774
FAX: 919 541-0516
E-Mail: oldham.conniesue@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ38

View Related Documents

Title: Revision to Definition of Volatile Organic Compounds--Exclusion of trans 1,3,3,3-tetrafluoropropene and 2,3,3,3- tertrafluoropropene

Abstract: This action proposes to add trans 1,3,3,3-tetrafluoropropene and 2,3,3,3-tertrafluoropropene to the list of negligibly reactive compounds in the definition of volatile organic compounds. Data indicate that the photochemical reactivity of these compounds is low enough that they can be regarded as negligibly reactive in ozone formation and will not contribute to violations of the ozone national ambient air quality standard. The compound 2,3,3,3-tertrafluoropropene has been identified as a possible substitute for a high global warming compound which is currently used in automobile air conditioners.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51.100(s) (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7602(s) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Action 00/00/0000

NPRM 10/17/2011 76 FR 64059

NPRM Comment Period End 11/16/2011

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 238220; 326150 Agency Contact: Dave Sanders Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
C539-01 Research Triangle Park , NC 27525
Phone: 919 541-3356
FAX: 919 541-0824
E-Mail: sanders.dave@epa.gov Agency Contact: Tom Coda Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
C539-01Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-3037
E-Mail: coda.tom@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ44

View Related Documents

Title: Review of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Lead

Abstract: Under the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977, EPA is required to review and if appropriate revise the air quality criteria for the primary (health-based) and secondary (welfare-based) national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) every 5 years. On November 12, 2008, EPA published a final rule to revise the primary and secondary NAAQS for lead to provide increased protection for public health and welfare. EPA revised the secondary standard to be identical in all respects to the revised primary standard. EPA has now initiated the next review. The review began in May 2010 with a workshop to discuss key policy-relevant issues around which EPA would structure the review. This review includes the preparation of an Integrated Science Assessment, and, if warranted, a Risk/Exposure Assessment, and also a Policy Assessment Document by EPA, with opportunities for review by EPA's Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee and the public. These documents inform the Administrator's proposed decision as to whether to retain or revise the standards.

Priority: Economically Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: Yes Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 50 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7408; 42 USC 7409 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 12/00/2013

Final Action 12/00/2014

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0108

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; State; Local; Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/naaqs/standards/pb/s_pb_index.html Agency Contact: Deirdre Murphy Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
C539-02 Research Triangle Park , NC 27709
Phone: 919 541-0729
FAX: 919 541-0840
E-Mail: murphy.deirdre@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Karen Martin Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
C504-06 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5274
FAX: 919 541-0237
E-Mail: Martin.Karen@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ48

View Related Documents

Title: Clean Air Fine Particle Implementation Rule Revision for PM2.5 NAAQS

Abstract: This action will address implementation issues for the PM2.5 NAAQS. It will address issues such as precursor policies and attainment demonstration guidance.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term ActionMajor: No Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 57.100 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Action 00/00/0000

NPRM 00/00/0000

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No Agency Contact: Rich Damberg Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
C539-01 Research Triangle Park , NC 20460
Phone: 919 541-5592
FAX: 919 541-0824
E-Mail: damberg.rich@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ49

View Related Documents

Title: Supplemental Determination for Renewable Fuels Produced Under the Final RFS2 Program From Pulpwood

Abstract: As indicated in the final rule for the Renewable Fuels Standard Program, while the Agency issued lifecycle greenhouse gas (GHG) threshold determinations for the major fuel pathways projected to meet the bulk of the RFS volume mandates, assessments of other new fuel pathways such as renewable fuels from pulpwood could not be completed in time for the final rule. In the process of assessing these fuels, the Agency is issuing determinations through several supplemental
notices to the final rule.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 86, 40 CFR 80 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: Clean Air Act 211(o) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Direct Final Action 00/00/0000

Additional Information: Split from RIN 2060-AQ36. Split from RIN 2060-AO81; EPA Docket information: EPA–HQ–OAR–

2005–0161

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Federalism: No Energy Affected: Yes International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise be of
international interest.

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/otaq/fuels/renewablefuels/index.htm

Sectors Affected: 324110 Agency Contact: Paul Argyropoulos Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
6401A Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-1123
E-Mail: argyropoulos.paul@epa.gov Agency Contact: Robert Larson Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
AAFCAnn Arbor , MI 48105
Phone: 734 214-4277
E-Mail: larson.robert@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ64

View Related Documents

Title: Supplemental Determination for Renewable Fuels Produced Under the Final RFS2 Program From Sorghum

Abstract: As indicated in the final rule for the Renewable Fuels Standard Program, while the Agency issued lifecycle greenhouse gas (GHG) threshold determinations for the major fuel pathways projected to meet the bulk of the RFS volume mandates, assessments of other new fuel pathways such as renewable fuels from sorghum could not be completed in time for the final rule. In the process of assessing these fuels, the Agency is issuing determinations through several supplemental
notices to the final rule.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 86, 80 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: Clean Air Act 211(o) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Action 00/00/0000

Additional Information: Split from RIN 2060-AQ49. Split from RIN 2060-AQ36. Split from RIN 2060-AO81; EPA Docket
information: EPA–HQ– OAR–2005–0161

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Federalism: No Energy Affected: Yes International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise be of
international interest.

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/otaq/fuels/renewablefuels/index.htm

Sectors Affected: 324110 Agency Contact: Paul Argyropoulos Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
6401A Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-1123
E-Mail: argyropoulos.paul@epa.gov Agency Contact: Robert Larson Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
AAFC Ann Arbor , MI 48105
Phone: 734 214-4277
E-Mail: larson.robert@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ72

View Related Documents

Title: Standards of Performance for New Stationary Sources and Emission Guidelines for Existing Sources: Other Solid Waste
Incineration Units

Abstract: EPA promulgated emissions standards for Other Solid Waste Incineration (OSWI) units on December 16, 2005. Units covered under this rule include certain very small municipal waste combustion and institutional waste incineration units. EPA received a petition for reconsideration of the OSWI standards on February 14, 2006, regarding the exclusion of certain categories, including SSI. While EPA granted the petition for reconsideration on June 28, 2006, EPA’s final review, which became effective January 22, concluded that no additional changes were necessary to the 2005 OSWI rule (71 FR 36726). That litigation is currently being held in abeyance. However, EPA currently intends to revise the emission standards for OSWIunits, and that rulemaking would address all OSWI units except SSI units.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: Clean Air Act sec 129 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Action 00/00/0000

NPRM 00/00/0000

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 562213 Agency Contact: Charlene Spells Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
E-143-05 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5255
FAX: 919 541-3470
E-Mail: spells.charlene@epa.gov Agency Contact: David Cozzie Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation 1200 Pennsylvania Ave, NW Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 919 541-5356
E-Mail: cozzie.david@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AR04

View Related Documents

Title: Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Adjustments to the Allowance System for Controlling HCFC Production, Import, and Export for 2015-2019

Abstract: This action adjusts the allowance system that controls the U.S. consumption and production of ozone-depleting substances (ODSs) known as hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs) to lower the amount of available allowances. While much less destructive to stratospheric ozone than chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), HCFCs contribute to ozone depletion and alternatives are generally available. The HCFC allowance system is part of EPA’s program to reduce the emissions of ODSs to protect the stratospheric ozone layer. Protection of the stratospheric ozone layer helps reduce rates of skin cancer and cataracts. The U.S. is obligated under the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer to limit HCFC consumption and production in a stepwise fashion achieving specific levels by specific dates. Reductions occurred January 1, 2004, and January 1, 2010. This rulemaking implements the next phasedown step, a reduction to 90% below the production and consumption baselines beginning January 1, 2015.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 82 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7671 to 7671(q) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 03/00/2013

Final Action 12/00/2013

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise be ofinternational interest.

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/ozone/title6/phaseout/classtwo.html

Sectors Affected: 333415; 423620; 325120; 424690; 238220; 423730 Agency Contact: Luke Hall-Jordan Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
6205J Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9591
FAX: 202 343-2338
E-Mail: Hall-Jordan.Luke@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AR33

View Related Documents

Title: Greenhouse Gas New Source Performance Standard for Electric Generating Units-Emission Guidelines for Existing
Sources

Abstract: This action will amend the electric generating units (EGUs) New Source Performance Standard and add a section 111(d) greenhouse gas (GHG) standard for existing sources.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: CAA 111 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 00/00/0000

Additional Information: Docket Number EPA-HQ-OAP-2011-0660.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Federalism: Undetermined Energy Affected: Yes

Related RINs: Split From 2060-AQ91 Agency Contact: Christian Fellner Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
D243-01 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-4003
FAX: 919 541-5450
E-Mail: fellner.christian@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Brian Shrager Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
D243-01 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-7689
FAX: 919 541-5450
E-Mail: shrager.brian@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AE94

View Related Documents

Title: NSPS: SOCMI--Wastewater and Amendment to Appendix C of Part 63 and Appendix J of Part 60

Abstract: These standards are based on a combination of control techniques that require removal or destruction of volatile organic compounds from wastewater at synthetic organic chemical manufacturing industry plants. Designated chemical process units, i.e., process lines or process units, would be subject to the rule. Constructed, reconstructed, or modified designated chemical process units would be required to apply appropriate controls to affected wastewater tanks, surface impoundments,containers, individual drain systems, and oil and water separators, and to treat process wastewater to remove or destroy the volatile organic compounds. On September 12, 1994, EPA proposed Standards of Performance for New Stationary Sources: Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from the Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry (SOCMI) Wastewater (40 CFR part 60, subpart YYY). On October 11, 1995, the EPA issued a supplemental proposal, which clarified and revised the previously proposed rule. On December 9, 1998, EPA published a supplement to the proposed rule that consisted of revised definitions, alternative test procedures, and clarifications of requirements, and that proposed to add appendix J to 40 CFR part 60. In conjunction with the rule development for the NSPS, amendments to appendix C to part 63 were proposed on June 30, 2004. This action has been withdrawn from the Regulatory Agenda because it has been incorporated into another Agenda action, "National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutant Emissions: Group IV Polymers and Resins, Pesticide Active Ingredient Production, and Polyether Polyols Production Risk and Technology Review" (RIN 2060-AR02).

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60 app J to part 60; 40 CFR 63 app C to part 63 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7411 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite
NPRM (NSPS) 09/12/1994 59 FR 46780
Supplemental NPRM 1 10/11/1995 60 FR 52889
Supplemental NPRM 2 12/09/1998 63 FR 67988

NPRM Amendment 06/30/2004 69 FR 39383

Withdrawn 12/08/2011

Additional Information: EPA publication information: Supplemental NPRM 2 - http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPAAIR/1998/December/Day-09/a28472a.htm; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2003-0191

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 3251 Agency Contact: Mary Kissell Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
E143-01 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-4516
FAX: 919 541-0246
E-Mail: kissell.mary@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AH37

View Related Documents

Title: Review of New Sources and Modifications in Indian Country

Abstract: This rule finalized federal regulations governing preconstruction permitting of minor stationary sources throughout Indian country and major stationary sources of air pollution in nonattainment areas in Indian country. Pursuant to the Tribal Air Rule, eligible Indian Tribes may receive EPA authorization to develop and implement such programs, but these permitting programs would be implemented by EPA if eligible Indian Tribes do not elect, or do not receive authorization, to manage such

programs.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 49.151 to 49.161; 49 CFR 49.166 to 49.173 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 08/21/2006 71 FR 48696

Final Action 07/01/2011 76 FR 38748Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM -http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=090000648024964a; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQOAR-2003-0076

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/nsr/

Sectors Affected: 924110; 33311; 23899; 3116; 3323; 324121; 811121; 3251; 72112; 323110; 212321; 211111; 22111; 4471; 42451; 331511; 332812; 32191; 221210; 211112; 21111; 311119; 3329; 3279; 42471; 32711; 32732; 54171; 321113; 22132; 321212; 562212; 33711 Agency Contact: Jessica Montanez Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
C504-03 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-3407
FAX: 919 541-5509
E-Mail: montanez.jessica@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Raj Rao Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
C504-03 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5344
FAX: 919 541-5509
E-Mail: rao.raj@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AI43

View Related Documents

Title: Review of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Carbon Monoxide

Abstract: Under the Clean Air Act, EPA is required to review and, if appropriate, revise the air quality criteria for the primary (health-based) and secondary (welfare-based) national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) every 5 years. The last carbon monoxide (CO) NAAQS review occurred in 1994 with a decision by the Administrator not to revise the existing standards. The current review which initiated in September 2007 includes the preparation of an Integrated Science Assessment, Risk/Exposure Assessment, and a Policy Assessment Document by EPA, with opportunities for review by EPA's Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee and the public. These documents inform the Administrator's decision as to whether to retain or revise the standards.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 50 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7408; 42 USC 7409 Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

NPRM Judicial US District Court Northern District of CA San Francisco Division 5/5/08 01/28/2011

Other Judicial US District Court Northern District of CA San Francisco Division 5/5/08 08/12/2011

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 02/11/2011 76 FR 8158

Final Action 08/31/2011 76 FR 54294

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM - http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=EPA-HQ-OAR2008-0015-0122; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0015

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; State; Local; Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/naaqs/standards/co/s_co_index.html Agency Contact: Deirdre Murphy Environmental Protection Agency
Air and RadiationC539-02 Research Triangle Park , NC 27709
Phone: 919 541-0729
FAX: 919 541-0840
E-Mail: murphy.deirdre@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Karen Martin Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
C504-06 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5274
FAX: 919 541-0237
E-Mail: Martin.Karen@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AJ86

View Related Documents

Title: Performance Specifications for Continuous Parameter Monitoring Systems

Abstract: EPA does not plan to continue with this rule. Most of these requirements will be incorporated into the action entitled "Compliance Data Reporting Rule" (RIN 2060-AP63). Compliance with many air rules is determined through use of process parameter values, instead of direct measurements of the pollutants of concern. No uniform set of requirements that inform users of parameter monitoring devices of the suitability of the devices for specific tasks or the ability of the devices to provide valid data to determine compliance exist. This rule would establish minimum acceptable requirements, both for initial installation and ongoing operation, for five common classes of parameter monitoring devices – temperature, pressure, flow rate (liquid, gas, and mass), pH, and conductivity. In addition, this rule would revise portions of other rules to ensure a consistent approach for parameter monitoring. Finally, unrelated to parameter monitoring, the rule would clarify ongoing quality assurance requirements for direct measurement devices that detect multiple pollutants. The rule was proposed on October 9, 2008 (73 FR 59956). Several commenters questioned the costs associated with the proposed rule and at least one commenter asked for a performance-based rule. While the Agency plans to consider the comments received on the proposed rule and intends to issue a supplemental proposal to solicit additional public input, further action on this rulemaking will be deferred as the Agency addresses other actions with statutory or judicial deadlines. During the interim period, the Agency plans on including performance specifications and quality assurance requirements in individual rulemakings that rely on process parameters to demonstrate ongoing compliance.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63 subpart SS; 40 CFR 63.8; 40 CFR 60 app B; 40 CFR 60 app F (To search for a specific CFR, visit

the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412(b)(5) et seq Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 10/09/2008 73 FR 59956

NPRM Extension of Comment Period 12/03/2008 73 FR 73629

Withdrawn 08/23/2011

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM - http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-AIR/2008/October/Day09/a22674.htm; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2006-0640

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 31-33; 21; 486; 562213; 562212; 22 Agency Contact: Barrett Parker Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
D243-05 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5635
FAX: 919 541-1039
E-Mail: parker.barrett@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Bob Schell Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
E-143-03Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-4116
FAX: 919 541-3207
E-Mail: schell.bob@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AK03

View Related Documents

Title: Performance-Based Measurement System For Fuels: Criteria For Self-Qualifying Alternative Test Methods; Description of Optional Statistical Quality Control Measures

Abstract: Transportation fuels (like gasoline and diesel fuel) are regulated by EPA under the Clean Air Act to control the emissions that result when they are burned in engines, and also to protect engines' emission control equipment. Fuels regulations require measurement of several of the fuels' properties, and prescribe "designated" analytical methods for that purpose. This regulation is intended to provide a way for regulated parties to self-qualify alternatives to the designated measurement methods that may be cheaper, quicker, simpler, more amenable to automation, or otherwise preferable. The regulation will also prescribe a minimum level of statistical quality control for all fuels test methods, designated or alternative.The regulations should quicken the adoption of new measurement technologies by removing the need for multiple methodspecific rulemakings, but to do so in a way that will not degrade the performance of the overall measurement system. Introduction of statistical quality control for all methods should improve measurement precision and accuracy in actual practice across all methods. The Agency is withdrawing this proposal because PBMS will be included in an upcoming Tier 3 rulemaking.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 80 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7545 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Withdrawn 09/15/2011

Additional Information: SAN No. 4633

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 324199; 54199; 42471; 48691; 334516 Agency Contact: Joe Sopata Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
6406J Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9034
FAX: 202 565-2085
E-Mail: Sopata.Joe@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AL84

View Related Documents

Title: Lifting the Stay of the Eight-Hour Portion of the Findings of Significant Contribution and Rulemaking for Purposes of Reducing Interstate Ozone Transport ("NOx SIP Call")

Abstract: This rule is being withdrawn from the regulatory agenda because no further action is planned.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51.121 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq Legal Deadline: NoneTimetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Withdrawn 11/30/2011

Additional Information: SAN No. 4797

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No Agency Contact: Tim Smith Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
C539-04 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-4718
FAX: 919 541-5489
E-Mail: smith.tim@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Rhea Jones Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
C539-04 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-2940
FAX: 919 541-5489
E-Mail: jones.rhea@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AN30

View Related Documents

Title: Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Revision to Listing of Carbon Dioxide Total Flooding Fire Extinguishing Systems Restricting Use to Only Unoccupied Areas

Abstract: Section 612 of the Clean Air Act requires EPA to identify alternatives to Class I and II ozone-depleting substances and to publish lists of acceptable and unacceptable substitutes. Carbon dioxide is currently listed as an "acceptable" total flooding substitute for ozone-depleting halons. Carbon dioxide total flooding systems are used in industrial applications such as automobile paint rooms and in marine applications such as machinery spaces. Recent changes to national fire protection industry standards reflect a need to improve personnel safety requirements for carbon dioxide systems by limiting its applications. Based on new information on the continued and growing use of carbon dioxide total flooding fire extinguishing systems, EPA is proposing to revise the listing to "acceptable subject to narrowed use limits" to ensure that the use of this agent does not pose greater risk than other substitutes that are available. Use would be limited to unoccupied areas where personnel could not be exposed to lethal concentration of the agent. EPA is withdrawing this rulemaking from the Regulatory Agenda because the Agency plans no further action.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 82 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7414; 42 USC 7601; 42 USC 7671 to 7671(q) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Withdrawn 11/16/2011

Additional Information: SAN No. 4991

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise be of
international interest.

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/ozone/snap

Sectors Affected: 811121; 336612; 441222; 212; 423990; 336611; 423910 Agency Contact: Bella Maranion Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
6205JWashington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9749
FAX: 202 343-2363
E-Mail: Maranion.Bella@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AN48

View Related Documents

Title: Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Amending Requirements to Import Ozone-Depleting Substances for Destruction in the
U.S.

Abstract: This rule would revise the requirements for import of Class I and Class II controlled ozone-depleting substances (controlled substances) into the United States by streamlining provisions for importing controlled substances specifically for purposes of destruction. The proposed provisions would no longer require used imports for destruction to abide by the petition process but instead require a more efficient pre-notification process to EPA in the form of a certification of intent to import for destruction for all imports for destruction - both used and virgin. The regulation would revise associated recordkeeping and reporting requirements for persons who import controlled substances for destruction - replacing an existing set of requirements with a new, more effective set of requirements. EPA is also proposing to revise the regulations governing the destruction of controlled substances under 40 CFR part 82, subpart A, by revising the definitions governing destruction of controlled substances and revising recordkeeping and reporting requirements for persons who destroy controlled substances. While overall burden for respondents will increase, this is due to the additional participants that EPA expects will take advantage of the new regulatory process by importing additional controlled substances for destruction. If there were no additional respondents projected to participate in the import process, overall burden to respondents would decrease. EPA believes that the streamlined regulatory provisions being proposed for importers would ease overall burden, encouraging more imports into the United States for responsible destruction and thus would result in the destruction of additional quantities of controlled substances in the United States that would have otherwise been emitted into the atmosphere, where they deplete the stratospheric ozone layer. EPA is withdrawing this rulemaking from the Regulatory Agenda because the Agency plans no further action.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 82 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7671 to 7671q Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Withdrawn 11/16/2011

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2006-0130

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Federal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise be of
international interest.

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/ozone/destruction.html

Sectors Affected: 54199; 42469; 562219 Agency Contact: Staci Gatica Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
6205J Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9469
FAX: 202 343-2338
E-Mail: Gatica.Staci@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AO03

View Related Documents

Title: National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Shipbuilding and Ship Repair (Surface Coating) Operations--Amendment

Abstract: This action will be subsumed into RIN 2060-AQ42. On December 15, 1995, the EPA issued national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) under section 112 of the Clean Air Act for shipbuilding and ship repair (surface coating) operations. The NESHAP sets Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) standards for existing and new major sources of hazardous air pollutant emissions. This action is intended to more clearly state the distinction between and the definition of ship and pleasure craft. It is being issued in response to questions concerning whether yachts greater than 20 meters (78.7 feet) in length are ships and, therefore subject to the shipbuilding NESHAP. This proposed action will ensure that all activities such as pleasure vessels (yachts) intended to be subject to the NESHAP are in fact subject to it.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: Clean Air Act sec 112 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Direct Final Action 12/29/2006 71 FR 78369

NPRM 12/29/2006 71 FR 78392

Withdrawal of Direct Final 02/27/2007 72 FR 8630

Withdrawn 08/19/2011

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM - http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-AIR/2006/December/Day29/a22428.htm; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2004-0357

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 92811; 336611 Agency Contact: Kaye Whitfield Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
E-143-03 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 919 541-2509
FAX: 919541-1039
E-Mail: whitfield.kaye@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Robin Dunkins Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
E143-03 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5335
FAX: 919 541-3470

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AO07

View Related Documents

Title: National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP): Miscellaneous Organic Chemical Manufacturing--

Amendments

Abstract: On November 10, 2003, EPA promulgated national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) for miscellaneous organic chemical manufacturing. The rule is referred to as the miscellaneous organic NESHAP or the MON. The MON incorporates by reference the wastewater tank requirements in the National Emission Standards for Organic Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry for Process Vents, Storage Vessels, Transfer Operations, and Wastewater, which EPA promulgated on April 24, 1994, and which is referred to as the hazardous organic NESHAP or the HON. On August 6, 2008 EPA proposed amending the HON, and thereby, the MON, by adding an equivalent means of emission limitation for wastewater tanks. EPA is withdrawing this action from the Regulatory Agenda because it has been incorporated into another Agenda action, "National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutant Emissions: Group IV Polymers and Resins, Pesticide Active Ingredient Production, and Polyether Polyols Production Risk and Technology Review" (RIN 2060-AR02).

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations )Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 08/06/2008 73 FR 45673

Withdrawn 12/08/2011

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM - http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-AIR/2008/August/Day06/a18142.pdf; Split from RIN 2060-AM43; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2003-0121

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 325 Agency Contact: Nick Parsons Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
E143-01 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5372
FAX: 919 541-0246
E-Mail: parsons.nick@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Penny Lassiter Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
E1430-01 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5396
FAX: 919 541-0246
E-Mail: lassiter.penny@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AO12

View Related Documents

Title: Commercial and Industrial Solid Waste Incineration Units; Response to Remand of New Source Performance Standards
and Emission Guidelines

Abstract: This action responded to the remand of the Commercial and Industrial Solid Waste Incineration (CISWI) New Source Performance Standards and Emission Guidelines under section 129 of the Clean Air Act. Among other things, we responded to the Court's 2003 remand of the CISWI rule and the Court's June 2007 vacatur of the CISWI Definitions Rule, and examined and revised the methodology for developing the MACT floors and emission limits.

Priority: Economically Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: Yes Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60; 40 CFR 62 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

NPRM Judicial 75 FR 31938 Docket ID EPA-HQ-OAR-2003-0119-0001 04/29/2010

Other Judicial 02/21/2011

Other Statutory Stay notice must be signed, effective date of rule is 5/20/11 05/19/2011

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 06/04/2010 75 FR 31937

Final Action 03/21/2011 76 FR 15704

Final - Notice of Reconsideration 03/21/2011 76 FR 15266

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM -http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=0900006480afbb7c; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQOAR-2003-0119

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: NoEnergy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 325; 334; 3254; 321 Agency Contact: Toni Jones Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
E143-03 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-0316
FAX: 919 541-3470
E-Mail: jones.toni@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Charlene Spells Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
E-143-05 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5255
FAX: 919 541-3470
E-Mail: spells.charlene@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AO50

View Related Documents

Title: Measurement of PM 2.5 and PM 10 Emissions by Dilution Sampling

Abstract: EPA is withdrawing this rulemaking from the Regulatory Agenda because the Agency plans no further action.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51 app M (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 23 USC 101; 42 USC 7401 to 7671(q) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Withdrawn 11/16/2011

Additional Information: SAN No. 5155

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 31-33; 22 Agency Contact: Jason Dewees Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
E143-02 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-9724
FAX: 919 541-0516
E-Mail: dewees.jason@epa.gov Agency Contact: Candace Sorrell Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
E143-02 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-1064
FAX: 919 541-0516
E-Mail: sorrell.candace@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AO51

View Related Documents

Title: Addition of Method 208, Protocol for the Source Testing, Analysis, and Reporting of VOC Emissions From Hot Mix Asphalt Plant DryersAbstract: Method 208 is a protocol for collecting, analyzing, and reporting of volatile organic compounds (VOC) emissions from asphalt paving production operations. It will produce more accurate measurement of the mass of VOC emissions from such operations than any other current method for measuring VOC. The method will allow the EPA to make a more accurate assessment of whether asphalt paving plants are major sources under the Federal programs for New Source Review and Prevention of Significant Deterioration. EPA is promulgating these methods to make them more widely available and acceptable for use by asphalt paving producers in meeting various environmental regulations. EPA is withdrawing this rulemaking from the Regulatory Agenda because the Agency plans no further action.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51, app M (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Withdrawn 11/16/2011

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0622

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 32412 Agency Contact: Gary McAlister Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
E 143-02 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-1062
FAX: 919 541-0516
E-Mail: mcalister.gary@epa.gov Agency Contact: Candace Sorrell Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
E143-02 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-1064
FAX: 919 541-0516
E-Mail: sorrell.candace@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AO53

View Related Documents

Title: National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Appendix A--Test Methods; Amendments to Method 301

Abstract: This action amended EPA's Method 301, Field Validation of Pollutant Measurement Methods from Various Waste Media. The Agency revised the procedures in Method 301 based on the Agency's experience in applying the method and to correct errors that were brought to the Agency's attention. Source owners and operators that use Method 301 to validate a proposed alternative method are subject to these requirements.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63 app A (revision) (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 12/22/2004 69 FR 76642

Final Action 05/18/2011 76 FR 28664

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM - http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-AIR/2004/December/Day22/a27985.htm; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2004-0080Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 31-33; 22 Agency Contact: Lula Melton Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
E143-02 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-2910
FAX: 919 541-4511
E-Mail: melton.lula@epa.gov Agency Contact: Robin Segall Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
EW143-02 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-0893
FAX: 919 541-0516
E-Mail: Segall.Robin@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AO55

View Related Documents

Title: Petroleum Refinery Residual Risk Standards

Abstract: Under CAA section 112(d)(6) EPA is required to review standards issued under section 112 and to revise them "as necessary (taking into account developments in practices, processes and control technologies)" no less frequently than every 8 years. EPA also must evaluate the MACT standards within 8 years after promulgation and promulgate standards under CAA section 112 (f)(2) if required to provide an ample margin of safety to protect public health or prevent an adverse environmental effect. The final rule was signed on January 16, 2009, but was not published in the Federal Register. On October 28, 2009, EPA proposed to withdraw the residual risk and technology portions of the final rule, in order to gather better emissions information from the refining industry. On the same day, EPA finalized amendments to the rule that implements requirements for heat exchange systems under CAA section 112(d)(2).

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 09/04/2007 72 FR 50716
Supplemental NPRM 11/10/2008 73 FR 66694

NPRM--Partial Withdrawal 10/28/2009 74 FR 55505
Final Action--Heat Exchangers 10/28/2009 74 FR 55670
Final Action--Heat Exchangers Correction 06/30/2010 75 FR 37730

Final Action--Partial Withdrawal 07/18/2011 76 FR 42052

Withdrawn 12/08/2011

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM - http://frwebgate1.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/PDFgate.cgi?WAISdocID=049012415583+2+2+0&WAISaction=retrieve; Split from RIN 2060-AN85; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR2003-0146

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPAAIR/2007/September/Day-04/a17009.pdf

Sectors Affected: 32411 Agency Contact: Bob Lucas Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
E143-01 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711Phone: 919 541-0884
FAX: 919 541-0246
E-Mail: lucas.bob@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AO91

View Related Documents

Title: NESHAP: Marine Tank Vessel Loading Operations; Printing and Publishing; Pharmaceuticals Production and Group I Polymers and Resins

Abstract: This action addresses the residual risk and technology reviews conducted for two national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) and supplements an October 2008 proposal addressing the residual risk and technology reviews for four NESHAP. The six NESHAP include 16 source categories. This action also modifies the existing emissions standards for eight source categories in three of the six NESHAP to address certain emission sources not currently regulated under these standards. It also addresses provisions for all six NESHAPs related to emissions during periods of startup, shutdown, and malfunction. Finally, this action changes two of the six NESHAPs to correct editorial errors, make clarifications, or address issues with implementation or determining compliance. The Polymers and Resins portion of this action, previously listed as RIN 2060-AQ61, was merged into this action.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412 Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

Other Judicial Consent decree deadline 03/31/2011

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 10/10/2008 73 FR 60432

NPRM Correction 10/24/2008 73 FR 63420
NPRM & Supplemental NPRM 10/21/2010 75 FR 65068

Final Action 04/21/2011 76 FR 22566

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM - http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=0900006480743aaa; Split from RIN 2060-AN85; EPA
Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0600

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 3254; 32311; 4883; 325212

Related RINs: Related to 2060-AN85 Agency Contact: Mary Kissell Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
E143-01 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-4516
FAX: 919 541-0246
E-Mail: kissell.mary@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP00

View Related Documents

Title: Prevention of Air Pollution Emergency Episodes

Abstract: This rulemaking is being withdrawn via the regulatory agenda because no further action is planned.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: NoCFR Citation: 40 CFR 51 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7410(a)(2)(G); 42 USC 7603 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Withdrawn 11/30/2011

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-1046

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 9241 Agency Contact: Dave Sanders Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
C539-01 Research Triangle Park , NC 27525
Phone: 919 541-3356
FAX: 919 541-0824
E-Mail: sanders.dave@epa.gov Agency Contact: Rich Damberg Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
C539-01 Research Triangle Park , NC 20460
Phone: 919 541-5592
FAX: 919 541-0824
E-Mail: damberg.rich@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP17

View Related Documents

Title: Regulation of Fuel and Fuel Additives: Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Test Methods (Alternative Test Method for Olefins in Gasoline)

Abstract: This rule would allow refiners and laboratories to use an alternative test method for olefins in gasoline. The allowance of this alternative test method would allow additional flexibility to the regulated community. The clean air benefits of EPA’s gasoline and diesel motor vehicle fuel programs will continue to be realized. There will be no adverse health or environmental impact as a result of this test method change.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 80 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: Clean Air Act 211 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Direct Final Action 12/08/2008 73 FR 74350

NPRM 12/08/2008 73 FR 74403

Partial Withdrawl of Direct Final Rule 02/06/2009 74 FR 6233
Supplemental NPRM 01/31/2011 76 FR 5319

Final Action 10/21/2011 76 FR 65382

Final Action Effective 11/21/2011

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM - http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-AIR/2008/December/Day08/a28372.pdf

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 324110; 54138Agency Contact: Joe Sopata Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
6406J Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9034
FAX: 202 565-2085
E-Mail: Sopata.Joe@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP24

View Related Documents

Title: Implementation of the 2011 National Ambient Air Quality Standard for Ozone and Anti-Backsliding Requirements for the Section 185 Fee Program for Purposes of the 1-hour Ozone NAAQS

Abstract: This action, now titled "Implementation of the 2008 National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ozone: Nonattainment Area Classifications Approach, Attainment Deadlines and Revocation of the 1997 Ozone Standards for Transportation Conformity Purposes," will henceforth be tracked under 2060-AR32.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51; 40 CFR 50 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7409; 42 USC 7410; 42 USC 7511 to 7511f; 42 USC 7601(a)(1) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Withdrawn 12/05/2011

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0885

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No Agency Contact: Karl Pepple Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
C539-01 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-2683
FAX: 919 541-0824
E-Mail: pepple.karl@epa.gov Agency Contact: Richard Damberg Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
C504-02 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5592
FAX: 919 541-5489
E-Mail: damberg.rich@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP25

View Related Documents

Title: NESHAP: Group I and IV Polymers and Resins: Amendments

Abstract: This rulemaking would amend the final maximum achievable control technology (MACT) rule for Group IV Polymers and Resins (Subpart JJJ) under National Emission Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for thermoplastics (Group IV polymers and Resins) by addressing a petition by Arteva Specialties for reconsideration concerning subcategorization and the control requirements for leaking equipment. The rule would clarify the categorization of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) resin using the continuous terephthalic acid high viscosity multiple end finisher process and determine whether the cost analysis used to regulate leaking equipment should be based on individual component types rather than the aggregated approach used in the final rule. EPA is withdrawing this rulemaking from the Regulatory Agenda because its provisions are being incorporated into another rulemaking with the identifying number RIN 2060-AR02.Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Withdrawn 11/30/2011

Additional Information: SAN No. 5280

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No Agency Contact: Penny Lassiter Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
E1430-01 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5396
FAX: 919 541-0246
E-Mail: lassiter.penny@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP50

View Related Documents

Title: Federal Implementation Plans: Interstate Transport of Fine Particulate Matter and Ozone and Correction of SIP Approvals

Abstract: This action, also known as the Transport Rule or the Cross State Air Pollution uses a cap and trade approach to reduce sulfur dioxide (SO2) and nitrogen oxides (NOx) emissions. This rule replaces the Clean Air Interstate Rule which was promulgated in 2005 and remanded to EPA in 2008 by the US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit.

Priority: Economically Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: Yes Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51; 40 CFR 52; 40 CFR 72; 40 CFR 78; 40 CFR 97 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite
Notice - Public Meeting 08/02/2010 75 FR 45075

NPRM 08/02/2010 75 FR 45210
NODA - Emissions Modeling 09/01/2010 75 FR 53613
NPRM - Correcting Amendments 09/14/2010 75 FR 55711
NODA - Emissions Inventory 10/27/2010 75 FR 66055
NODA - Allocation Approaches 01/07/2011 76 FR 1109

Final Action 08/08/2011 76 FR 48208

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM - http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=0900006480b25be1; http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0491-4574; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-

0491

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State

Small Entities Affected: Business; Governmental Jurisdictions Federalism: No Energy Affected: Yes International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise be of
international interest.

RIN Information URL: www.epa.gov/crossstaterule

Sectors Affected: 221112 Agency Contact: Meg Victor Environmental Protection AgencyAir and Radiation
6204J Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9193
E-Mail: victor.meg@epa.gov Agency Contact: Gabrielle Stevens Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
6204J Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9252
E-Mail: stevens.gabrielle@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP61

View Related Documents

Title: Control of Greenhouse Gas Emissions From Medium and Heavy-Duty Vehicles

Abstract: EPA set national emissions standards under section 202 (a) of the Clean Air Act to control greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from medium- and heavy-duty engines and vehicles, as part of a joint rulemaking with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). This joint rulemaking effort was announced by President Obama on May 21, 2010. EPA and NHTSA published a joint Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in the Federal Register on November 30, 2010 (75 FR 74152, November 30, 2010). This rulemaking will significantly reduce GHG emissions from future medium- and heavy-duty vehicles by setting GHG standards that would lead to the introduction of GHG-reducing vehicle and engine technologies. This action follows the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Massachusetts vs. EPA that greenhouse gases are air pollutants under the Clean Air Act, and that EPA therefore has a duty to determine, based solely on scientific considerations, whether that air pollution endangers public health or welfare. EPA has since determined that six greenhouse gases taken in combination endanger the public health and welfare and that the combined emissions from new motor vehicles and motor vehicle engines contribute to the greenhouse gas air pollution that endangers public health and welfare. This rulemaking also follows the Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking “Regulating Greenhouse Gas Emissions Under the Clean Air Act,” (73 FR 44354, July 20, 2008).

Priority: Economically Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: Yes Unfunded Mandates: Private Sector

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 85; 40 CFR 86; 40 CFR 1 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: Clean Air Act sec 202 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite
Notice - Public Meeting 11/01/2010 75 FR 67059

NPRM 11/30/2010 75 FR 74152

Final Action 09/15/2011 76 FR 57106

Additional Information: EPA publication information: Notice - Public Meeting -http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=0900006480b7c821; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQOAR-2010-0162

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/otaq/climate/regulations.htm

Sectors Affected: 811198; 336111; 811112; 336120; 336112; 454312; 541690 Agency Contact: Byron Bunker Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
AAHDOC Ann Arbor , MI 48105
Phone: 734 214-4155
E-Mail: Bunker.Byron@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Angela Cullen Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
AAHDOC Ann Arbor , MI 48105
Phone: 734 214-4419
E-Mail: Cullen.Angela@epamail.epa.govEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP67

View Related Documents

Title: Compression Ignition Engine NSPS--Amendments

Abstract: This action amended the New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) for stationary compression ignition internal combustion engines. These amendments were the result of a settlement agreement with the American Petroleum Institute. The amendments to the rule included limiting the operation and maintenance (O&M) requirements to emission-related O&M and allowing certified engine owners/operators to operate/maintain their engines according to their own O&M practices if they conduct performance testing to demonstrate compliance. The amendments also clarified the requirements for temporary replacement engines. In addition, this action amended the NSPS to implement more stringent emission standards for engines with a displacement above 10 liters/cylinder, consistent with recent revisions to standards for similar mobile source engines. This action revised the requirements for engines in rural portions of Alaska. The amendments also corrected minor errors in the
NSPS.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7411 Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

NPRM Judicial settlement agreement with API 05/22/2010

Other Judicial settlement agreement with API 06/08/2011

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 06/08/2010 75 FR 32611

NPRM Comment Period Extended 08/06/2010 75 FR 47520

NPRM Comment Period Extended End 09/08/2010

Final Action 06/28/2011 76 FR 37954

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM -http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=0900006480afe2c6; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQOAR-2010-0295

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No Energy Affected: No Agency Contact: Melanie King Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
D243-01 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-2469
E-Mail: king.melanie@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Robert J Wayland Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
D243-01 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-1045
FAX: 919 541-5450
E-Mail: wayland.robertj@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP68

View Related Documents

Title: Implementing the 1997 8-hour Ozone NAAQS: Section 185 Penalty Fee Provisions

Abstract: This project is being withdrawn via the regulatory agenda because on July 1, 2011, the D.C. Circuit Court vacated and remanded EPA's section 185 guidance on developing fee programs.Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7410; 42 USC 7511 to 7511f; 42 USC 7601(a)(1) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Withdrawn 09/02/2011

Additional Information: Split from RIN 2060-AO96; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0956

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No Agency Contact: Lynn Dail Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
C539-01 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-2363
FAX: 919 541-0824
E-Mail: dail.lynn@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Rich Damberg Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
C539-01 Research Triangle Park , NC 20460
Phone: 919 541-5592
FAX: 919 541-0824
E-Mail: damberg.rich@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP72

View Related Documents

Title: Proposal to Revise the Interpollutant Trading Policy for PM2.5 Offsets

Abstract: This action is being withdrawn via the regulatory agenda because in a July 11, 2011 memorandum titled, " Revised Policy to Address Reconsideration of Interpollutant Trading Provisions for Fine Particles (PM2.5) ," EPA announced a change in EPA's policy concerning the development and adoption of interpollutant trading (offset) provisions for PM2.5 under state nonattainment area New Source Review programs.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7410; 42 USC 7501 et seq; 42 USC 7601(a)(1) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Withdrawn 09/02/2011

Additional Information: Split from RIN 2060-AN86. Split from RIN 2060-AK74; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2003-

0062

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State; Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.epa.gov/nsr/ Agency Contact: Dan DeRoeck Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
C504-02 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5593FAX: 919 541-5509
E-Mail: deroeck.dan@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Raj Rao Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
C504-03 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5344
FAX: 919 541-5509
E-Mail: rao.raj@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP75

View Related Documents

Title: Implementation of the New Source Review (NSR) Program for Particulate Matter Less Than 2.5 Micrometers (PM2.5); Final Rule to Repeal Grandfather Provision

Abstract: This final rule repealed the grandfathering provision for particulate matter less than 2.5 micrometers (PM2.5) contained in the federal Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) regulations at 40 CFR 52.21. The final rule did not take a final action concerning the proposed early ending of the use of EPA’s PM10 Surrogate Policy as an interim means of satisfying the PM2.5 requirements in state PSD programs. Because no final action was taken, the Policy ended on May 16, 2011, in accordance with the original schedule for ending its use in state PSD SIPs.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51.166; 40 CFR 52.21 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7410; 42 USC 7501 et seq; 42 USC 7601(a)(1) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 02/11/2010 75 FR 6827

Final Action 05/18/2011 76 FR 28646

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM - http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=EPA-HQ-OAR2003-0062-0299; Split from RIN 2060-AN86. Split from RIN 2060-AK74; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2003-0062

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State; Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/nsr/ Agency Contact: Dan DeRoeck Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
C504-02 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5593
FAX: 919 541-5509
E-Mail: deroeck.dan@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Raj Rao Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
C504-03 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5344
FAX: 919 541-5509
E-Mail: rao.raj@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP92

View Related Documents

Title: Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: The 2011 Critical Use Exemption From the Phaseout of Methyl Bromide

Abstract: This rule authorizes uses that qualify for the 2011 critical use exemption and the amount of methyl bromide that maybe produced, imported, or supplied from existing pre-phaseout inventory for those uses in 2011. EPA took this action under the authority of the Clean Air Act to reflect a consensus decision of the Parties to the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer at the Twenty-First Meeting of the Parties.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 82 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7671(c)(d)(6) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 04/28/2011 76 FR 23769

Final Action 09/30/2011 76 FR 60736

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM - http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=EPA-HQ-OAR2008-0321-0002; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0321

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/ozone/mbr

Sectors Affected: 493130; 311211; 1113; 493110; 1114; 325320; 115114; 311212; 115112; 1112 Agency Contact: Jeremy Arling Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
6205J Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9055
FAX: 202 343-2338
E-Mail: Arling.Jeremy@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ09

View Related Documents

Title: Revisions to Motor Vehicle Fuel Economy Label

Abstract: EPA is responsible for developing the fuel economy labels that are posted on window stickers of all new light duty cars, light-duty trucks, and medium-duty passenger vehicles sold in the U.S. The Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 imposed several new labeling requirements on NHTSA and EPA, including introducing environmental metrics on vehicle labels. Additionally, increasing market penetration of advanced technology vehicles, such as electric, plug-in hybrid electric, and fuel cell vehicles, will require new metrics to effectively convey information to consumers. EPA and NHTSA are thus jointly developing new labeling requirements, which will help consumers to make more informed vehicle purchase decisions, particularly as the future automotive marketplace provides more diverse vehicle technology choices for consumers. These new label requirements do not affect the methodologies used by EPA to generate consumer fuel economy estimates, nor automaker compliance values for NHTSA's corporate average fuel economy and EPA's greenhouse gas emissions standards.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 85; 40 CFR 86; 40 CFR 600 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: Energy Policy Conservation Act (EPCA) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite
Notice - Public Meeting 09/28/2010 75 FR 59673

NPRM 09/23/2010 75 FR 58078

Final Action 07/06/2011 76 FR 39478

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM -http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=0900006480b5acd9; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQOAR-2009-0865

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: NoSmall Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/fueleconomy/regulations.htm

Sectors Affected: 336111 Agency Contact: Lisa Snapp Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation

NVFEL Ann Arbor , MI 48105
Phone: 734 214-4282
E-Mail: snapp.lisa@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Linc Wehrly Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation

NVFEL Ann Arbor , MI 48105
Phone: 734 214-4286
E-Mail: wehrly.linc@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ17

View Related Documents

Title: Regulation to Prevent the Misfueling of Vehicles and Engines With Gasoline Containing Greater Than Ten Volume Percent Ethanol and Modifications to the Reformulated and Conventional Gasoline Programs

Abstract: Under the Clean Air Act section 211(c), this rulemaking proposes to control and regulate distribution of fuels and fuel additives that may pose harm to the environment or public health. Vehicles or engines not certified or approved for gasoline containing greater than 10% ethanol ("E10+") may experience increased emissions of criteria pollutants and accelerated deterioration of emission control systems due to higher oxygen content from increased ethanol levels. These emission increases will have an adverse effect on air quality and public health. Furthermore, vehicles/engines operating on E10+ may experience operability issues leading to tampering of certified configurations designed to satisfy EPA emissions requirements. This rulemaking proposes to help mitigate misfueling by prohibiting the use of E10+ in vehicles/engines not approved to use E10+ and by requiring an E15 misfueling mitigation program. This rulemaking also proposes to modify the Reformulated Gasoline program (40 CFR part 80) to update the Complex Model allowing fuel manufacturers to certify batches of gasoline containing up to 15% ethanol ("E15"). These modifications are required for fuel manufacturers to make and sell E15. This rulemaking is necessary because of the proliferation of "blenderpumps"—pumps that allow consumers to select E10+ blend levels—and the Agency's recent E15 partial waiver decisions in response to a waiver request under the Clean Air Act section 211(f)(4) which allow for E15 to be introduced into commerce for use in some vehicles/engines. Such a waiver and the expansion of blenderpumps create a need for a misfueling mitigation program to ensure that consumers do not fuel their vehicles or engines with unapproved fuels.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 80 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: CAA 211(c) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 11/04/2010 75 FR 68043

Final Action 07/25/2011 76 FR 44406

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM -http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=0900006480b80c65; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQOAR-2010-0448

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 325193 Agency Contact: Barry Garelick Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
6406J Washington , DC 20460Phone: 202 343-9028
E-Mail: Garelick.Barry@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Robert Anderson Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
6405J Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9718
E-Mail: Anderson.Robert@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ24

View Related Documents

Title: Standards of Performance for New Stationary Sources and Emissions Guidelines for Existing Sources: Hospital/Medical/Infectious Waste Incinerators; Amendments

Abstract: On October 6, 2009, EPA promulgated its response to the remand of the new source performance standards and emissions guidelines for hospital/medical/infectious waste incinerators by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit and satisfied the Clean Air Act section 129(a)(5) requirement to conduct a review of the standards every 5 years. This action proposes to amend the new source performance standards emissions limits for nitrogen oxides (NOx) and sulfur dioxide (SO2) promulgated for large hospital/medical/infectious waste incinerators in order to correct inadvertent drafting errors we made setting forth those limits, which did not correspond to our description of our standard-setting process.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51; 40 CFR 52 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: Clean Air Act sec 129 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 05/14/2010 75 FR 27249

Final Action 04/04/2011 76 FR 18407

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM - http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=0900006480aed9ef

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No Agency Contact: Amy Hambrick Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
E143-03 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-0964
FAX: 919 541-3470
E-Mail: hambrick.amy@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: David Cozzie Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation 1200 Pennsylvania Ave, NW Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 919 541-5356
E-Mail: cozzie.david@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ28

View Related Documents

Title: New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) Review for Petroleum Refineries (Subpart J)--Response to
Reconsideration--Other Issues

Abstract: This action will be subsumed into RIN 2060-AQ75. On June 24, 2008, EPA promulgated amendments to the Standards of Performance for Petroleum Refineries and new standards for process units constructed, reconstructed, or modifiedafter May 14, 2007. EPA received three petitions for reconsideration of the final rule. On September 26, 2008, EPA granted reconsideration and issued a stay for the issues raised in the petitions regarding process heaters and flares. EPA also proposed various technical corrections in that action that were raised in the petitions for reconsideration. At that time, EPA also agreed to reconsider other issues in future notices. Under this action, EPA will address the other issues raised by Petitioners.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7411 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Withdrawn 08/19/2011

Additional Information: Split from RIN 2060-AN72; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0011

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 32411 Agency Contact: Brenda Shine Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
E143-01 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-3608
FAX: 919 541-0246
E-Mail: shine.brenda@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Penny Lassiter Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
E1430-01 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5396
FAX: 919 541-0246
E-Mail: lassiter.penny@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ42

View Related Documents

Title: Risk and Technology Review NESHAP for Shipbuilding and Ship Repair (Surface Coating) and Wood Furniture Manufacturing

Abstract: This action would conduct residual risk and technology reviews for two industrial source categories regulated by two National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP): Shipbuilding and Ship Repair (Surface Coating), and Wood Furniture Manufacturing. The underlying national emission standards that are under review in this action limit and control hazardous air pollutants. Section 112(f)(2) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) directs EPA to assess the risk remaining (residual risk) after the application of the NESHAP and promulgate additional standards if warranted to provide an ample margin of safety to protect public health or prevent an adverse environmental effect. Also, section 112(d)(6) of the CAA requires EPA to review and revise the NESHAP as necessary at least every 8 years, taking into account developments in practices, processes, and control technologies. This action would conduct those reviews for the two source categories cited above.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

NPRM Judicial 12/03/2010

Other Judicial 11/04/2011

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 12/21/2010 75 FR 80219Final Action 11/21/2011 76 FR 72050

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM - http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=EPA-HQ-OAR2010-0786-0001; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0786

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: Undetermined Agency Contact: Nicholas Swanson Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
E143-03 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-4080
FAX: 919 541-1039
E-Mail: swanson.nicholas@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Robin Dunkins Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
E143-03 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5335
FAX: 919 541-3470

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ43

View Related Documents

Title: NESHAP for Primary Lead Smelting

Abstract: This action is the Risk and Technology Review (RTR) for Primary Lead Smelters. It will address both EPA's obligation under Clean Air Act (CAA) section 112(f)(2) and 112(d)(6) to conduct a residual risk review and to conduct a technology review. Under the "technology review" provision of CAA section 112, EPA is required to review maximum achievable control technology (MACT) standards and to revise them “as necessary (taking into account developments in practices, processes and control technologies)” no less frequently than every 8 years. Under the "residual risk" provision of CAA section 112, EPA must evaluate the MACT standards within 8 years after promulgation and promulgate standards if required to provide an ample margin of safety to protect public health or prevent an adverse environmental effect.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

NPRM Statutory 07/27/2010

NPRM Judicial 01/31/2011

Other Judicial 10/31/2011

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 02/17/2011 76 FR 9410

NPRM Extension of Comment Period 03/17/2011 76 FR 14636

NPRM Extension of Comment Period #2 04/18/2011 76 FR 21692

Final Action 11/15/2011 76 FR 70834

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM - http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=EPA-HQ-OAR2004-0305-0003; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2004-0305

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No Agency Contact: Nathan Topham Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
D 243-02 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-0483FAX: 919 541-3207
E-Mail: topham.nathan@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Chuck French Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
Mail Code D243-02 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-7912
FAX: 919 541-3207
E-Mail: french.chuck@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ57

View Related Documents

Title: Transport Rule to Address 2008 Ozone Standards

Abstract: This rule is being withdrawn because EPA's reconsideration of the 2008 ozone NAAQS has not been finalized.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: CAA sec 110(a)(2)(D)(i) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Withdrawn 10/07/2011

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No Agency Contact: Tim Smith Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
C539-04 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-4718
FAX: 919 541-5489
E-Mail: smith.tim@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Rhea Jones Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
C539-04 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-2940
FAX: 919 541-5489
E-Mail: jones.rhea@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ66

View Related Documents

Title: Determinations Concerning Need for Error Correction, Partial Approval and Partial Disapproval, and Federal Implementation Plan Regarding Texas Prevention of Significant Deterioration Program

Abstract: This final rule addresses prevention of significant deterioration (PSD) permitting for greenhouse gas (GHG) emitting sources in Texas. EPA has identified that it made an error in granting full approval of Texas’s PSD program in 1992, and is using the error correction provisions under the Clean Air Act to convert that full approval to a partial approval and partial disapproval. In the same notice, EPA also implements a federal implementation plan (FIP) to apply the PSD program to newly regulated pollutants, specifically GHG.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 52 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401; 42 USC 7410; 42 USC 7414; 42 USC 7416; 42 USC 7601Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 12/30/2010 75 FR 82365

Final Action 05/03/2011 76 FR 25178

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM - http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=EPA-HQ-OAR2010-1033-0062; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR--2010-1033

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.epa.gov/nsr Agency Contact: Cheryl Vetter Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
C504-03 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-4391
FAX: 919 541-5509
E-Mail: vetter.cheryl@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Raj Rao Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
C504-03 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5344
FAX: 919 541-5509
E-Mail: rao.raj@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ68

View Related Documents

Title: Residual Risk and Technology Review for Secondary Lead Smelters NESHAP

Abstract: This action addresses both EPA's obligation under Clean Air Act (CAA) to conduct a residual risk review and to conduct a technology review. Under the "technology review" provision of CAA section 112, EPA is required to review maximum achievable control technology (MACT) standards and to revise them "as necessary (taking into account developments in practices, processes and control technologies)" no less frequently than every 8 years. Under the "residual risk" provision of CAA section 112, EPA must evaluate the MACT standards within 8 years after promulgation and promulgate standards if required to provide an ample margin of safety to protect public health or prevent an adverse environmental effect. The MACT standards for Secondary Lead Smelters, which are also known as the National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Secondary Lead Smelters, were promulgated on June 23, 1995 under Clean Air Act section 112(d). The standards establish emission limitations and work practice standards for all new and existing secondary lead smelters that produce refined lead from lead scrap, mainly recycled spent lead acid batteries. The RTRs for secondary lead smelters will be conducted in this rulemaking. These reviews will address possible residual risks, technology advancements, and technical deficiencies in the existing NESHAP.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: CAA sec 307(b)(2) Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

NPRM Judicial Consent decree deadline 04/29/2011

Other Judicial Consent decree deadline 12/16/2011

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 05/19/2011 76 FR 29032

Extension of Comment Period 07/01/2011 76 FR 38591

Final Action 01/05/2012 77 FR 556

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM - http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=EPA-HQ-OAR2011-0344-0001; EPA Docket information: EPA–HQ–OAR–2011–0344

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No Agency Contact: Chuck French Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
Mail Code D243-02 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-7912
FAX: 919 541-3207
E-Mail: french.chuck@epa.gov Agency Contact: Steve Fruh Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
D243-02 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-2837
FAX: 919 541-4991
E-Mail: fruh.steve@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ69

View Related Documents

Title: Response to the September 2010 Section 126 Petition From New Jersey Regarding SO2 Emissions From the Portland Generating Station

Abstract: This final rule responded to a CAA section 126 petition filed by New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) which requested emissions relief from a power plant in Pennsylvania that is interfering with New Jersey's efforts to meet the 1-hour national standard for sulfur dioxide. EPA granted the petition and has required the power plant to further limit its sulfur dioxide emissions within 3 years.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 52 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: sec 126 of the CAA Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Notice of Extension 11/16/2010 75 FR 69889

NPRM 04/07/2011 76 FR 19662

Final Action 11/07/2011 76 FR 69052

Final Action Effective 01/06/2012

Additional Information: EPA publication information: Notice of Extension - http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0473-0002; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-

0081

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No Agency Contact: Todd Hawes Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
C539-04 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5591
FAX: 919 685-3190
E-Mail: hawes.todd@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Gobeail McKinley Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
C539-04 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5246FAX: 919 685-3700
E-Mail: mckinley.gobeail@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ73

View Related Documents

Title: Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) and Nonattainment New Source Review (NSR): Reconsideration of Inclusion of Fugitive Emissions; Stay and Revisions

Abstract: This rulemaking effectuates a stay of the final rule titled, “Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) and Nonattainment New Source Review (NSR): Reconsideration of Inclusion of Fugitive Emissions” (Fugitive Emissions Rule), published on December 19, 2008. That rule required that fugitive emissions be included in determining whether a physical or operational change results in a major modification only for sources in industries that have been designated by the Clean Air Act. This rule supersedes the stay of the Fugitive Emissions Rule provisions issued on March 31, 2010, and thereby corrects inadvertent errors contained in that stay. This action also extended the stay until EPA completes its reconsideration of the Fugitive Emissions Rule.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51 and 52 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7470 to 7490 and 7503 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite
Interim Rule - Stay and Revisions 03/30/2011 76 FR 17548

Extension of Comment Period 04/27/2011 76 FR 23489

Additional Information: EPA publication information: Interim Rule - Stay and Revisions - http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=EPA-HQ-OAR-2004-0014-0074; Split from RIN 2060-AP73. Split from RIN 2060-AM91; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2004-0014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.epa.gov/nsr

Sectors Affected: 32552; 325181; 325188; 325199; 325998; 336399; 324199; 331311; 336111; 325414; 325182; 221121; 221122; 325193; 32592; 221112; 221111; 32512; 325131; 336112; 325411; 336213; 336211; 33634; 33635; 2212; 211112; 322122; 221113; 221119; 32551; 322121; 32213; 32411; 325412; 4862; 32591; 3221; 32513; 325132; 336212 Agency Contact: Peter Keller Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
C504--03 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5339
FAX: 919 541-5509
E-Mail: keller.peter@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Raj Rao Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
C504-03 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5344
FAX: 919 541-5509
E-Mail: rao.raj@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ74

View Related Documents

Title: Amendments to National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Area Sources: Plating and Polishing: Direct Final Rule

Abstract: On June 12, 2008, EPA issued national emission standards for control of hazardous air pollutants (HAP) for theplating and polishing area source category under section 112 of the Clean Air Act. On June 20, 2011 EPA published a direct final action and parallel proposal to amend the national emission standards for HAP (NESHAP) for the plating and polishing area source category. The amendments clarified that the emission control requirements of the plating and polishing area source NESHAP do not apply to any bench-scale activities. Also, several technical corrections and clarifications that do not make significant changes in the rule’s requirements have been made to the rule text. Although EPA viewed these revisions as noncontroversial, EPA received one substantive comment. EPA will address this comment and publish a final rule simultaneously with the withdrawal of this direct final rule.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: Clean Air Act 112 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 06/15/2011 76 FR 35806

Final Action 09/19/2011 76 FR 57913

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM - http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2011-06-20/pdf/2011- 15273.pdf; Split from RIN 2060-AM37; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2005-0084

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No Energy Affected: No Agency Contact: Donna Jones Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
D243-02 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5251
FAX: 919 541-3207
E-Mail: jones.donnalee@epa.gov Agency Contact: Steve Fruh Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
D243-02 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-2837
FAX: 919 541-4991
E-Mail: fruh.steve@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ76

View Related Documents

Title: 2012 Renewable Fuel Volume Standards as Required by Energy Independence and Security Act

Abstract: In response to the Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA), EPA finalized the RFS2 program regulations. Under EISA, the Environmental Protection Agency is required to promulgate regulations that specify the annual statutory volume requirements for renewable fuels, including cellulosic biofuel, biomass-based diesel, advanced biofuel, and total renewable fuel that must be used in transportation fuel annually. In the case of the cellulosic biofuel standard, EISA specifically requires that the standard be set based on the volume projected to be available during the following year. If the volumes are lower than those specified under EISA, then EPA may also lower the advanced biofuel and total renewable fuel standards each year accordingly. Further, the Act requires the Administrator to promulgate rules establishing the applicable volumes of biomass-based diesel for 2013 and beyond and to do so no later than 14 months before the first year for which such applicable volume will apply. Therefore, this action will also propose and finalize, at minimum, the 2013 biomass based diesel (BBD) volume along with all the 2012 standards. This regulatory action will establish, as required, the annual statutory volume requirements for the RFS2 fuel categories (cellulosic, biomass-based diesel, advanced biofuel, and renewable fuel) that apply to all gasoline and diesel produced or imported in 2012 and set, at minimum, the 2013 BBD requirement. Entities potentially affected by this final rule are those involved with the production, distribution, and sale of transportation fuels, including gasoline and diesel fuel or renewable
fuels such as ethanol and biodiesel.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 80 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: CAA 211(o)Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 06/28/2011 76 FR 37703

Final Action 01/09/2012 77 FR 1320

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM - http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2011-06-28/pdf/2011- 16144.pdf

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 325199; 325193; 424690; 454319; 424710; 324110; 424720 Agency Contact: David Korotney Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation

N27 Ann Arbor , MI 48105
Phone: 734 214-4507
E-Mail: korotney.david@epa.gov Agency Contact: Paul Argyropoulos Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
6401A Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-1123
E-Mail: argyropoulos.paul@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ77

View Related Documents

Title: Updating Cross-References for the Oklahoma State Implementation Plan

Abstract: This action made a technical change to the regulatory text as amended in the final rule “Limitation of Approval of Prevention of Significant Deterioration Provisions Concerning Greenhouse Gas Emitting-Sources in State Implementation Plans” to amend regulatory text cross-referencing portions of Oklahoma’s State Implementation Plan (SIP). Region 6 approved revisions to the Oklahoma SIP that recodified the regulations. This approved recodification took effect on December 27, 2010. This rule updated cross-references in the regulatory text in light of this recodification.

Priority: Info./Admin./Other Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 52 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: Clean Air Act title I Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Action 03/04/2011 76 FR 11963

Additional Information: EPA publication information: Final Action - http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=EPA-HQOAR-2009-0517-19233; Split from RIN 2060-AP86; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0517

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State; Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.epa.gov/nsr Agency Contact: Michael S Brooks Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
C504-05 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-3539
E-Mail: brooks.michaels@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Juan Santiago Environmental Protection AgencyAir and Radiation
C504-05 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-1084
FAX: 919-541-5509
E-Mail: santiago.juan@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ78

View Related Documents

Title: National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Stationary Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines;

Amendments

Abstract: EPA took direct final action to promulgate amendments to the final national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants for existing stationary reciprocating internal combustion engines. The final rule was published on August 20, 2010. This direct final action amended certain regulatory text to clarify compliance requirements related to continuous parametric monitoring systems. EPA granted a 90-day stay of these requirements on January 19, 2011 and through this action clarified the requirements. EPA also corrected minor typographical errors in the regulatory text to the August 20, 2010 action.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Direct Final Action 03/09/2011 76 FR 12863

NPRM 03/09/2011 76 FR 12923

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM - http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=EPA-HQ-OAR2008-0708-0827; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0708

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; State; Local

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/atw/rice/ricepg.html Agency Contact: Melanie King Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
D243-01 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-2469
E-Mail: king.melanie@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Robert J Wayland Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
D243-01 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-1045
FAX: 919 541-5450
E-Mail: wayland.robertj@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ79

View Related Documents

Title: Deferral of Application of the Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) and Title V Programs to CO2 Emissions From Bioenergy and Other Biogenic Sources

Abstract: This action deferred for a period of three (3) years the application of the Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) and Title V permitting requirements to CO2 emissions from bioenergy and other biogenic sources. The Agency intends to use this time to seek independent scientific analysis of the complex issues pertinent to the climate impacts of these emissions and todevelop a rulemaking on how these emissions should be treated and accounted for in Clean Air Act PSD and Title V permitting.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51; 40 CFR 52; 40 CFR 70; 40 CFR 71 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 03/21/2011 76 FR 15249

Final Action 07/20/2011 76 FR 43490

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM - http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=EPA-HQ-OAR2011-0083-0001; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-0083

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/nsr/actions.html#jan11

Sectors Affected: 112; 325193; 322; 221320; 562213; 562212; 221; 321 Agency Contact: Jennifer Jenkins Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
6207J Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9361
E-Mail: Jenkins.Jennifer@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Suzanne Kocchi Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
6207J Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9387
E-Mail: Kocchi.Suzanne@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ80

View Related Documents

Title: Change to the Reporting Date for Certain Data Elements Required Under the Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gases

Rule

Abstract: On October 30, 2009, EPA finalized the Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gases Rule, which requires sources in certain industrial sectors above certain threshold levels to monitor and report their GHG information. EPA is taking action to defer reporting requirements for a subset of the data required to be reported. This rule defers the date that entities report certain data to EPA until either March 31, 2013, or March 31, 2015, depending on the data. This action does not change any other requirements of the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (40 CFR part 98), including the requirement that reporters continuously maintain accurate records of these and all other data.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 98 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Interim Final 12/27/2010 75 FR 81338

NPRM 12/27/2010 75 FR 81350

Final Action 08/25/2011 76 FR 53057

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM - http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=EPA-HQ-OAR2010-0929-0001; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0929Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/emissions/ghgrulemaking.html

Sectors Affected: 327910; 311611; 212113; 212112; 327310; 325; 611; 334111; 332; 327211; 311411; 311421; 327213; 622; 316; 327410; 339; 211; 334419; 327212; 322; 324; 486210; 326; 212391; 331; 334413; 562212; 336; 221; 321 Agency Contact: Jessica Gordon Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
6207J Washington , DC 20016
Phone: 202 343-9444
E-Mail: gordon.jessica@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Jennifer Bohman Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
6207H Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9548
FAX: 202 343-2338
E-Mail: Bohman.Jennifer@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ82

View Related Documents

Title: Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Adjustments to the Allowance System for Controlling HCFC Production, Import, and Export for 2011

Abstract: In 2009, EPA finalized a rule allocating hydrochlorofluorocarbon (HCFC) allowances for 2010-2014 (74 FR 66412). Two allowance holders challenged how EPA established the baselines for HCFC-22 and HCFC-142b in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. The Court vacated the rule in part and remanded it to EPA. This interim final rulemaking responds to the Court's decision by establishing baseline and annual allowances for the 2011 control period. EPA intends to issue a separate notice and comment rulemaking to address future control periods.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 82 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7671 to 7671(q) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Interim Final 08/05/2011 76 FR 47451

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA—HQ—OAR—2010-1040 Sectors Affected: 333415 Air-Conditioning and Warm Air Heating Equipment and Commercial and Industrial Refrigeration Equipment Manufacturing; 423620 Electrical and Electronic Appliance, Television, and Radio Set Merchant Wholesalers; 325120 Industrial Gas Manufacturing; 424690 Other Chemical and Allied Products Merchant Wholesalers; 238220 Plumbing, Heating, and Air-Conditioning Contractors; 423730 Warm Air Heating and Air-Conditioning Equipment and Supplies Merchant Wholesalers

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise be of
international interest.

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/ozone//title6/phaseout/classtwo.html

Sectors Affected: 333415; 423620; 325120; 424690; 238220; 423730 Agency Contact: Luke Hall-Jordan Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
6205J Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9591FAX: 202 343-2338
E-Mail: Hall-Jordan.Luke@epa.gov Agency Contact: Staci Gatica Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
6205J Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9469
FAX: 202 343-2338
E-Mail: Gatica.Staci@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ85

View Related Documents

Title: 2011 Technical Corrections, Clarifying and Other and Amendments to Certain Provisions of the Mandatory Reporting of
Greenhouse Gases Rule

Abstract: This action would make technical corrections, clarifying and other amendments to requirements of the Greenhouse Gas Mandatory Reporting rules that were finalized in 2010. The corrections and amendments are mostly clarifying in nature to ensure that the rules can be implemented by owners and operators of facilities as intended and will address questions raised by reporters during implementation. This action would make relatively minor changes that ease implementation. It would not fundamentally change the structure of the program or its requirements.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 98 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 08/04/2011 76 FR 47392

NPRM Comment Period End 09/19/2011

Final Action 11/29/2011 76 FR 73886

Final Action Effective 12/29/2011

Additional Information: EPA Docket Information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-0147. Sectors Affected: 325120 Industrial Gas Manufacturing; 562212 Solid Waste Landfill; 322110 Pulp Mills; 322121 Paper (except Newsprint) Mills; 322122 Newsprint Mills; 322130 Paperboard Mills; 311611 Animal (except Poultry) Slaughtering; 311411 Frozen Fruit, Juice, and Vegetable Manufacturing; 311421 Fruit and Vegetable Canning; 221320 Sewage Treatment Facilities; 212112 Bituminous Coal Underground Mining; 221121 Electric Bulk Power Transmission and Control; 212113 Anthracite Mining; 325193 Ethyl Alcohol Manufacturing; 324110 Petroleum Refineries

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/emissions/ghgrulemaking.html

Sectors Affected: 311611; 212113; 212112; 221121; 325193; 311411; 311421; 325120; 322122; 322121; 322130; 324110; 322110; 221320; 562212 Agency Contact: Lisa Hanle Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
6207J Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9434
FAX: 202 343-2359
E-Mail: hanle.lisa@epa.gov Agency Contact: David Jacobson Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
6207J Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9419
FAX: 202 343-2359
E-Mail: jacobson.david@epa.govEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ87

View Related Documents

Title: Final Regulation Extending the Reporting Deadline for Year 2010 Data Elements Required Under the Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gases Rule

Abstract: On October 30, 2009, EPA finalized the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule, which requires sources in certain industrial sectors above certain threshold levels to monitor and report their activities. Under the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule, sources must report their 2010 emissions by March 31, 2011. This rule extended the deadline for entities to report their 2010 data to EPA until September 30, 2011. This will enable EPA to incorporate various late changes to the Rule into development of the Rule's required electronic reporting tool and allow additional internal and stakeholder testing of the tool.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 98 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

Other Statutory Under the existing rule, sources must report their 2010 emissions by March 31, 2011. 03/31/2011

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Action 03/18/2011 76 FR 14812

Additional Information: EPA publication information: Final Action - http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=EPA-HQOAR-2011-0191-0001; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-0191

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/emissions/ghgrulemaking.html Agency Contact: Jessica Gordon Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
6207J Washington , DC 20016
Phone: 202 343-9444
E-Mail: gordon.jessica@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Pamela Franklin Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
6207J Washington , DC 20016
Phone: 202 343-9476
E-Mail: franklin.pamela@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ94

View Related Documents

Title: Clarifications to Indian Tribes' Clean Air Act Regulatory Requirements; Direct Final Amendments

Abstract: This rule made amendments necessary to provide regulatory clarity to Indian Tribes. The current CFR Part 49 entitled "Tribal Clean Air Act Authority" was renamed to "Indian Country: Air Quality Planning and Management." The current title could be misread as only including requirements applicable to the granting of authority to Tribes under the Clean Air Act. The new title clarifies that the regulatory requirements within the Part deal more generally with the planning and management of air quality in Indian Country. Other changes included moving sections 49.22, 49.23, and 49.24 out of subpart A, which includes provisions relating generally to tribal authority regardless of the EPA Region within which the tribe is located, to subpart L, Implementation Plans for Tribes in Region IX. These sections are better organized so all Federal Implementation Plan activities that apply to Region IX Tribes are located together under subpart L. Section 49.2 through 49.24 are reserved sections.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed ActionMajor: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 49 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: Clean Air Act Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Direct Final Action 04/29/2011 76 FR 23876

Direct Final Action Comment Period End 05/31/2011

Direct Final Rule Effective 07/28/2011

Additional Information: EPA publication information: Final Action - http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2011-04-29/pdf/2011- 10321.pdf; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0293

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/tribal/ Agency Contact: Darrel Harmon Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
601A Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-7416
FAX: 202 501-1153
E-Mail: harmon.darrel@epa.gov Agency Contact: Regina Chappell Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
C304-03 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-3650
FAX: 919 541-0942
E-Mail: chappell.regina@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AR01

View Related Documents

Title: • Federal Implementation Plans for IA, KS, MI, MO, OK, and WI to Reduce Interstate Transport of Ozone

Abstract: This action supplements the final Transport Rule (also known as the Cross State Air Pollution Rule). This action proposes the inclusion of six additional states (Iowa, Kansas, Michigan, Missouri, Oklahoma, and Wisconsin) in the Transport Rule's NOX ozone season program. Analyses conducted for the final Transport Rule demonstrate that these six states significantly contribute to nonattainment and/or interfere with maintenance of the 1997 ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) in another state. The air quality modeling for the final Transport Rule identified two new maintenance areas for the 1997 ozone NAAQS that were not identified in the proposal: Allegan County, MI and Harford County (near Baltimore), MD. This notice provides an additional opportunity for public comment on these issues.

Priority: Economically Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: Yes Unfunded Mandates: Private Sector

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51; 40 CFR 52; 40 CFR 72; 40 CFR 78; 40 CFR 97 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 07/11/2011 76 FR 40662

NPRM Comment Period End 08/22/2011

Final Action 12/27/2011 76 FR 80760

Final Action Effective 01/26/2012

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM - http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=NLRB-2011- 0002-9973; Split from RIN 2060-AP50; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0491Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State

Small Entities Affected: Business; Governmental Jurisdictions Federalism: Yes Energy Affected: Yes

RIN Information URL: www.epa.gov/crossstaterule

Sectors Affected: 221112

Related RINs: Related to 2060-AP50 Agency Contact: Meg Victor Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
6204J Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9193
E-Mail: victor.meg@epa.gov Agency Contact: Gabrielle Stevens Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
6204J Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9252
E-Mail: stevens.gabrielle@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AR08

View Related Documents

Title: Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gases: Revisions to Best Available Monitoring Method Provisions

Abstract: EPA published subpart W: Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems of the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule on November 30, 2010. The final subpart W rule gives owners and operators of covered facilities the option to use best available monitoring methods (BAMM) for any parameter that cannot reasonably be measured according to the monitoring requirements of subpart W. This action would extend the optional use of BAMM to reporters under subpart W for the entire calendar year.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 98 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 06/27/2011 76 FR 37300

Final Action 09/27/2011 76 FR 59533

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM - http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=EPA-HQ-OAR2011-0417-0001; Split from RIN A2060. Split from RIN 2060-AP99; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0923

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/emissions/ghgrulemaking.html

Sectors Affected: 221210; 211112; 211; 486210 Agency Contact: Akachi Imegwu Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
6207J Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9709
E-Mail: imegwu.akachi@epa.gov Agency Contact: Roger Fernandez Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
6207J Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9386
FAX: 202 565-2079
E-Mail: Fernandez.Roger@epamail.epa.govEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AR09

View Related Documents

Title: Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule: Technical Revisions for Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems and Electronics Manufacturing

Abstract: This action proposes technical revisions to two subparts of the greenhouse gas reporting rule. These subparts are petroleum and natural gas systems (subpart W; RIN 2060-AP99) and electronics manufacturing (subpart I; RIN 2060-AQ00). EPA received questions from the public on specific provisions in subpart W. This proposed action would address inconsistencies in subpart W rule text; clarify areas where the rule text was unclear; correct errors in rule methodologies for calculating greenhouse gases (GHG) such as incorrect equations; and further align language to more clearly portray EPA's intent. This action also proposes to amend the provisions contained within subpart I--electronics manufacturing--to calculate and report emissions from fluorinated GHGs used as heat transfer fluids (HTFs). Specifically, EPA is proposing to amend the definition of HTFs to include all fluorocarbons that can enter the atmosphere under the conditions in which HTFs are used.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 98 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7414 and 7542 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 09/09/2011 76 FR 56010

NPRM Comment Period End 10/11/2011

Final Action Effective 12/28/2011

Final Action 12/23/2011 76 FR 80554

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-0512

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/emissions/ghgrulemaking.html

Sectors Affected: 334111; 221210; 211112; 211; 334419; 486210; 334413 Agency Contact: Akachi Imegwu Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
6207J Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9709
E-Mail: imegwu.akachi@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AR17

View Related Documents

Title: Air Quality Designations for the 2008 Lead National Ambient Air Quality Standards: Second Round

Abstract: This final rule establishes air quality designations for certain areas in the US that in 2010 received deferred designations due to pending collection and review of additional data from recent deployed monitors for the 2008 lead (Pb) National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). EPA was required to make the final initial designations no later than two years from the October 15, 2008 promulgation of the revised NAAQS. However, if the Administrator has insufficient information to make these designations, the EPA has the authority to extend the designation process by up to one year. EPA began operation in January 2010, and issued this second rule to designate those deferred areas as meeting or not meeting the 2008
Pb NAAQS.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 81 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: CAA sec 107(d); 42 USC 7407(d) Legal Deadline:Action Source Description Date

Other Statutory CAA requires EPA to issue designations no later than 2 years from the 10/15/08 promulgation of the revised lead NAAQS. 10/14/2011

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Action 11/22/2011 76 FR 72097

Final Action Effective 12/31/2011

Additional Information: Split from RIN 2060-AP78; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0443

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No Agency Contact: Rhonda Wright Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
C539-04 Research Triangle Park , NC 27709
Phone: 919 541-1087
FAX: 919 541-0824
E-Mail: Wright.Rhonda@epa.gov Agency Contact: Rhea Jones Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
C539-04 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-2940
FAX: 919 541-5489
E-Mail: jones.rhea@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AR23

View Related Documents

Title: Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gases: Additional Sources of Fluorinated GHGs: Extension of Best Available Monitoring Provisions for Electronics Manufacturing

Abstract: EPA published a rule on December 1, 2010, requiring monitoring and reporting of greenhouse gases from electronics manufacturing (subpart I of the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program). Owners and operators subject to subpart I have the option to use and/or request to use best available monitoring methods (BAMM) during 2011 for any parameter that cannot be reasonably be measured according to the monitoring and QA/QC requirements. This action stayed for three months the requirement that requests to use BAMM to develop emission factors for the plasma etching process type be submitted by June 30, 2011. This action also administratively stayed for three months the rule requirement that requests to use BAMM to estimate emissions that occur beyond December 31, 2011, for unique and extreme circumstances be submitted by June 30, 2011. Lastly, this action, stayed for three months the end date (June 30, 2011) by which owners and operators of facilities who choose to use BAMM during 2011 be allowed to use BAMM without requesting approval. This action only affects a short time period within the first year of data collection under subpart I, and does not affect rule provisions for monitoring in 2012 and beyond.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 98 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Action 06/22/2011 76 FR 36339

Additional Information: EPA publication information: Final Action - http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2011-06-22/pdf/2011- 15650.pdf; Split from RIN 2060-AQ00; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0927

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: NoRIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/emissions/ghgrulemaking.html

Sectors Affected: 333415; 221121; 423610; 33531; 423620; 334111; 443111; 325120; 334419; 334413; 335313; 326150;

423730 Agency Contact: Deborah Ottinger Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
6202J Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9149
E-Mail: Ottinger.Deborah@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Kirsten Cappel Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
6202J Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9556
E-Mail: Cappel.Kirsten@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AR24

View Related Documents

Title: Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gases: Natural Gas and Petroleum Systems: Extension of BAMM Provisions

Abstract: EPA published subpart W: Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems of the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule on November 30, 2010. The final subpart W rule gives owners and operators of covered facilities the option to use best available monitoring methods (BAMM) during 2011. This action initiates reconsideration of specific rule provisions related to BAMM. In addition, this action includes an extension of specific BAMM deadlines for an additional three months thereby extending the date by which owners and operators of certain facilities who choose to use BAMM during 2011 are not be required to submit a BAMM application, and also extending the deadline by three months for which owners and operators who wish to use or extend use of BAMM must submit their applications to the Administrator for consideration. This action is not considered significant in that it is not expected to result in an increase in burden to facilities that choose to use BAMM for 2011 and would only affect an optional provision in the final rule. Finally, this action only affects a short time period within the first year of data collection under subpart W, and does not affect rule provisions for data collection in 2012 and beyond.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 98 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Action 04/25/2011 76 FR 22825

Additional Information: EPA publication information: Final Action - http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=EPA-HQOAR-2009-0923-3618; Split from RIN 2060-AP99; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0923

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/emissions/ghgrulemaking.html

Sectors Affected: 221210; 211112; 211; 486210 Agency Contact: Akachi Imegwu Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
6207J Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9709
E-Mail: imegwu.akachi@epa.gov Agency Contact: Roger Fernandez Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
6207J Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9386FAX: 202 565-2079
E-Mail: Fernandez.Roger@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AR26

View Related Documents

Title: Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gases: Changes to Provisions for Electronics Manufacturing (Subpart I) to Provide Flexibility

Abstract: On December 1, 2010, EPA published a rule that finalized a regulation to require monitoring and reporting of greenhouse gas emissions from electronics manufacturing (subpart I of the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule, 40 CFR part 98). The final subpart I gives owners and operators of covered facilities the option to use best available monitoring methods for any parameter that cannot reasonably be measured according to the monitoring and QA/QC requirements of subpart I. This action would make minor modifications to the monitoring provisions to provide flexibility for the largest semiconductor facilities to comply with the rule in the first two years of implementation. This action is not considered significant in that it is not expected to result in an increase of burden to facilities that would choose to use the more flexible compliance approach. In addition, this action would only affect the first two years of data collection under the rule and would not affect monitoring provisions in 2013 and beyond.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 98 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 06/22/2011 76 FR 36472

Final Action 09/27/2011 76 FR 59542

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM - http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2011-06-22/pdf/2011- 15651.pdf; Split from RIN A2060. Split from RIN 2060-AQ00; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0927

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/emissions/ghgrulemaking.html

Sectors Affected: 333415; 221121; 423610; 33531; 423620; 334111; 443111; 325120; 334419; 334413; 335313; 326150;

423730 Agency Contact: Kirsten Cappel Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation
6202J Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9556
E-Mail: Cappel.Kirsten@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AD44

View Related Documents

Title: Test Rule; Multiple Substance Rule for the Testing of Developmental and Reproductive Toxicity

Abstract: On March 4, 1991, EPA issued a proposed Toxics Substances and Control Act (TSCA) section 4 Test Rule to require testing of 12 chemicals for developmental and/or reproductive effects. Since issuing that proposed rule, 11 of the subject chemical substances have been sponsored under the International Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) HPV Screening Information Data Set (SIDS) Program, EPA's voluntary HPV Chemical Challenge Program, and/or the International Council of Chemical Associations (ICCA). Information obtained under these various data collection/development programs will be used to inform EPA's decision regarding the need to re-propose and ultimately finalize this Test Rule for some or all of the subject chemicals and for which endpoints they should be tested.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed RuleMajor: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 790 to 799; 40 CFR 704 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 15 USC 2603 TSCA 4; 15 USC 2625 TSCA 26 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite
NPRM Original 03/04/1991 56 FR 9092
Withdrawing NPRM 01/00/2012

Additional Information: SAN No. 4395

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/oppt/chemtest

Sectors Affected: 325; 32411 Agency Contact: Catherine Roman Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7405M Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-8172
FAX: 202 564-4765
E-Mail: Roman.Catherine@epa.gov Agency Contact: Karen Chu Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7405M Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-8773
FAX: 202 564-4765
E-Mail: chu.karen@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ07

View Related Documents

Title: Testing Agreement for Aryl Phosphates (ITC List 2)

Abstract: EPA published a proposed test rule under section 4 of the Toxics Substances and Control Act (TSCA) in 1992 covering a number of aryl phosphate base stocks. On March 30, 1993, EPA announced initiation of negotiations with the Aryl Phosphates Panel of the Chemical Manufacturers Association (now the American Chemistry Council or ACC) to develop a TSCA section 4 Enforceable Consent Agreement (ECA) for aryl phosphate base stocks as an alternative approach to testing under the proposed rule (58 FR 16669). On October 9, 1998, EPA sent letters to the Chief Executive Officers of companies, including those who were participating in the development of this ECA, to announce EPA's High Production Volume (HPV) Challenge Program. Consistent with the International Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) Screening Information Data Set (SIDS) Program, EPA's HPV Challenge Program encourages US chemical producers and importers to voluntarily provide existing screening level data, or, if none exist, to develop such data on US HPV chemicals. Because some overlap of testing in the HPV Challenge and this ECA initiative were identified, the industry committed to develop the screening level data for the HPV Challenge Program before continuing with further development of the ECA. In this way, results from the HPV Challenge program would feed back into consideration of needs for the ECA testing and, where possible, could avert some or all of the potential overlap testing. EPA is evaluating the need for any additional testing of the subject aryl phosphate base stocks under an ECA or rulemaking.

Priority: Info./Admin./Other Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 790 to 799 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 15 USC 2603 TSCA 4 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

ANPRM 12/29/1983 48 FR 57452

NPRM 01/17/1992 57 FR 2138

Withdrawal of NPRM 01/00/2012Additional Information: SAN No. 3493.2.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/oppt/chemtest

Sectors Affected: 325; 32411 Agency Contact: Mike Mattheisen Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7405M Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-3077
E-Mail: mattheisen.mike@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ08

View Related Documents

Title: Certain Polybrominated Diphenyl Ethers; Significant New Use Rule (SNUR) and Test Rule

Abstract: As described in the Chemical Action Plan for Polybrominated Diphenyl Ethers (PBDEs) released on December 30, 2009, EPA intends to propose amending the existing PBDE SNUR promulgated in 2006 to require manufacturers, importers, and processors of seven PBDEs to submit a significant new use notice (SNUN) to EPA before they can begin manufacturing, importing, or processing any of the seven PBDEs, including in articles. EPA also intends to propose a test rule to require anyone who manufactures, imports, or processes pentaBDE, octaBDE, or decaBDE after the relevant effective dates to conduct testing to obtain specific data on health effects, environmental effects, and chemical fate. PBDEs are a family of chemicals with a common structure of a brominated diphenyl ether molecule which may have anywhere from one to ten bromine atoms attached. PBDEs have been widely used as flame retardants in a number of applications: c-pentaBDE was used primarily as an additive flame retardant in flexible polyurethane foams; c-OctaBDE was used in acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene (ABS) plastic which was used as casing for certain electric and electronic devices used in both offices and homes. Domestic manufacture of c-pentaBDE and c-octaBDE ceased in 2004 when the Great Lakes Chemical Corporation (now Chemtura Corporation) voluntarily phased out their production. In 2006 EPA promulgated a SNUR designating manufacture or import of any of six PBDEs (tetraBDE, pentaBDE, hexaBDE, heptaBDE, octaBDE, and nonaBDE) a significant new use. The 2006 SNUR does not address processing or the importation of articles containing the six PBDEs, and does not address a seventh PBDE, decabromodiphenyl ether (decaBDE), which is still manufactured and widely used in the United States. On December 17, 2009, as the result of negotiations with EPA, the two U.S. producers of decaBDE, Albemarle Corporation and Chemtura Corporation, and the largest U.S. importer, ICL Industrial Products, Inc., announced commitments to phase out production, and importation of decaBDE for most uses in the United States by December 31, 2012, and to end all uses by the end of 2013.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 721; 40 CFR 790 to 799 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 15 USC 2601 et seq Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 06/25/1991 56 FR 29140

Second NPRM 12/00/2011

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OPPT-2010-1039

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.epa.gov/oppt/chemtest, http://www.epa.gov/oppt/existingchemicals/pubs/actionplans/pbde.html

Sectors Affected: 32411; 325 Agency Contact: Catherine Roman Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7405M Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-8172FAX: 202 564-4765
E-Mail: Roman.Catherine@epa.gov Agency Contact: John Bowser Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7405M Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-8082
E-Mail: bowser.john@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ20

View Related Documents

Title: Pesticides; Certification of Pesticide Applicators

Abstract: EPA is proposing change to the Federal regulations under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) that guide the certified pesticide applicator program (40 CFR 171). Change is sought to strengthen the regulations to better protect pesticide applicators and the public and the environment from harm due to pesticide exposure. The possible need for change arose from EPA discussions with key stakeholders. EPA has been in extensive discussions with stakeholders since 1997 when the Certification and Training Assessment Group (CTAG) was established. CTAG is a forum used by regulatory and academic stakeholders to discuss the current state of, and the need for improvements in, the national certified pesticide applicator program. Throughout these extensive interactions with stakeholders, EPA has learned of the potential need for changes to the regulation.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 171; 40 CFR 156 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 7 USC 136; 7 USC 136i; 7 USC 136w Legal Deadline: None

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: These regulations have been in place since 1972. Since then, many States have advanced the existing requirements to better protect applicators, the public, and the environment. The Agency is proposing revisions to establish a more protective national standard.

Legal Basis: 7 U.S.C. 136 through 7 U.S.C. 136y.

Alternatives: The Agency has developed mechanisms to improve applicator trainers and make training materials more accessible. The Agency has also developed nationally relevant training and certification materials to preserve State resources.

Costs and Benefits: Costs and benefits from the proposed rule are being prepared.

Risks: Applicators are at risk from exposure to pesticides they handle for their work. The public and the environment may also be at risk from misapplication by non-competent applicators. Revisions to the regulations are expected to minimize these risks by ensuring the competency of certified applicators.

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 10/00/2012

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OPP-2005-0561

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State; Tribal

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/health/worker.htm

Sectors Affected: 9241; 112; 111; 1132; 32532; 5617; 115 Agency Contact: Kathy Davis Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7506P Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703 308-7002
FAX: 703 308-2962
E-Mail: davis.kathy@epa.govAgency Contact: Richard Pont Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7506P Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703 305-6448
FAX: 703 308-2962
E-Mail: pont.richard@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ22

View Related Documents

Title: Pesticides; Agricultural Worker Protection Standard Revisions

Abstract: EPA is developing a proposal under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) to revise the Federal regulations guiding agricultural worker protection (40 CFR 170). The changes under consideration are intended to improve agricultural workers' ability to protect themselves from potential exposure to pesticides and pesticide residues. In addition, EPA is proposing to make adjustments to improve and clarify current requirements and facilitate enforcement. Other changes sought are to bring hazard communication requirements more in line with OSHA requirements and make improvements to pesticide safety training, with improved worker safety the intended outcome. The potential need for change arose from EPA discussions with key stakeholders beginning in 1996 and continuing through 2004. EPA held nine public meetings throughout the country, during which the public submitted written and verbal comments on issues of their concern. In 2000 through 2004, EPA held meetings where invited stakeholders identified their issues and concerns with the regulations.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 170 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 7 USC 136; 7 USC 136w Legal Deadline: None

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: Stakeholders have identified gaps in the protections in the current regulation. Revisions to the rule are necessary to better protect agricultural workers and pesticide handlers from unreasonable adverse effects of pesticide

exposure.

Legal Basis: 7 U.S.C. 136 through 7 U.S.C. 136y.

Alternatives: Wherever deficiencies in the existing regulation could be adequately addressed through non-regulatory means, EPA has done so. For example, the Agency has developed improved training materials that are sector-specific and in multiple languages; improved capacity for outreach; a train-the-trainer program; health care practitioner (HCP) curricula to train HCPs on pesticide exposure identification and treatment; and a bilingual manual for HCPs to use in identifying pesticide poisonings. The Agency also provides financial support for pesticide safety training.

Costs and Benefits: Incremental costs to agricultural employers are expected to increase as a result of revised requirements for training, notification, and other protections. Incremental costs to commercial pesticide handler employers are expected to decrease. Benefits will accrue to workers' and handlers' health, and improved protection of children is expected to be realized from the proposed revisions.

Risks: Agricultural workers and pesticide handlers are at risk from pesticide exposure through their work activities, and may put their families at risk of secondary exposure. In order to address exposure risks to workers, pesticide handlers, and their families, the Agency is proposing revisions identified by stakeholders and the public.

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Action 00/00/0000

NPRM 07/00/2012

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OPP-2005-0561

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; State; Tribal

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/health/worker.htm

Sectors Affected: 111; 32532; 115 Agency Contact: Kathy Davis Environmental Protection AgencyOffice of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7506P Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703 308-7002
FAX: 703 308-2962
E-Mail: davis.kathy@epa.gov Agency Contact: Richard Pont Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7506P Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703 305-6448
FAX: 703 308-2962
E-Mail: pont.richard@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ26

View Related Documents

Title: Prions; Amendment of EPA’s Regulatory Definition of Pests to Include Prion

Abstract: In 2003, the Agency decided that a prion (proteinaceous infectious particles) is a "pest" under Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) and that a product intended to reduce the infectivity of prions on inanimate surfaces (i.e., “prion product”) is considered to be a pesticide. Any company seeking to distribute or sell such a product is required to register the product with EPA unless the product is exempt from registration requirements before it can be distributed or sold in the United States. Through this action, EPA proposed to formally declare prions to be a pest and to amend its regulations to add prions to the list of pests (40 CFR part 152). A supplemental notice will propose product performance data requirements (i.e., efficacy data) for prion-related products and announce the availability of draft efficacy testing guidance for comment. EPA believes that regulating prion products protects human health and the environment against unreasonable adverse effects and ensures that such products are effective.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 152.5(d) (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 7 USC 136; 7 USC 136(w) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 01/26/2011 76 FR 4602
Supplemental NPRM 11/17/2011 76 FR 71294
Supplemental NPRM Comment Period End 01/17/2012

Final Action 11/00/2012

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM - http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=EPA-HQ-OPP2010-0427-0002; Supplemental NPRM - http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0427-0020; EPA
Docket information: EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0427

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; State

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/

Sectors Affected: 32532; 32561; 541940 Agency Contact: Carlton Kempter Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7510P Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703 305-5448
FAX: 703 308-6467
E-Mail: kempter.carlton@epa.gov Agency Contact: Tajah Blackburn Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7510P Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703 308-0372
E-Mail: Blackburn.Tajah@epa.govEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ27

View Related Documents

Title: Pesticides; Data Requirements for Plant-Incorporated Protectants (PIPs) and Certain Exemptions for PIPs

Abstract: EPA will propose codifying data requirements that specifically address the registration data needs of plantincorporated protectants (PIPs). These data requirements are intended to provide EPA with data and other information necessary for the registration of a PIP or the issuance of an experimental use permit for a PIP. These requirements would improve the Agency’s ability to make regulatory decisions about the human health and environmental effects of these products. By codifying data requirements specific to PIPs, the regulated community would have a better understanding of and could better prepare for the PIP registration process. This proposed rule is one in a series of proposals to update and clarify pesticide data requirements. In general, pesticide data requirements are codified in 40 CFR 158, which describes the minimum data and information EPA typically requires to support an application for pesticide registration or amendment; support the maintenance of a pesticide registration by means of the data call-in process, e.g., as used in the registration review program; or establish or maintain a tolerance or exemption from the requirements of a tolerance for a pesticide chemical residue. This part establishes general policies and procedures associated with the submission of data in support of a pesticide regulatory action. It does not, however, include study protocols, methodology, or standards for conducting or reporting test results; nor does this part describe how the Agency uses or evaluates the data and information in its risk assessment and risk management decisions, or the regulatory determinations that may be based upon the data. Also, EPA will propose to exempt cisgenic PIPs from registration to encourage research and development of useful biotechnology and reduce the number of PIPs seeking registration. Cisgenic PIPs are formed when genetic material is transferred, using bioengineering technology, between plants that could transfer the genetic material naturally.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 152, 158, and 174 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 7 USC 136 to 136(y); 21 USC 346(a) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 04/00/2012

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OPP-2009-0499

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/oppbppd1/biopesticides/pips/index.htm

Sectors Affected: 32532 Agency Contact: Rose Kyprianou Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7506P Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703 305-5354
FAX: 703 305-5884
E-Mail: kyprianou.rose@epa.gov Agency Contact: Chris Wozniak Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7511P Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703 308-4043
FAX: 703 308-7026
E-Mail: wozniak.chris@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ28

View Related DocumentsTitle: Pesticides; Expansion of Crop Grouping Program

Abstract: In phases, EPA is revising the current pesticide crop grouping regulations to create new crop groupings, add new subgroups, and expand existing crop groups by adding new commodities. The current crop groupings allow EPA to establish pesticide tolerances for multiple related crops based upon data for a representative set of crops. EPA expects these revisions to promote greater use of crop grouping for tolerance-setting purposes and to facilitate the availability of pesticides for minor crop uses. The first in the series of revisions to the crop grouping regulations was finalized in December 2007, and the second phase of revisions was finalized in December 2010. For the third phase of revisions to the crop grouping regulations, the EPA is proposing to amend two additional crop groups- stone fruit group 12 and tree nut group 14.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 180.41 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 21 USC 346(a) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 1 05/23/2007 72 FR 28920

Final Action 1 12/07/2007 72 FR 69150

Final Action 1; Technical Amendment 01/02/2008 73 FR 51

NPRM 2 01/06/2010 75 FR 807

Final Action 2 12/08/2010 75 FR 76285

NPRM 3 11/09/2011 76 FR 69693

NPRM 3 Comment Period End 01/09/2012

Final Action 3 07/00/2012

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM 1 - http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-PEST/2007/May/Day23/p9595.htm; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OPP-2006-0766

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://cfpub1.epa.gov/oppref/food_feed/index.cfm

Sectors Affected: 32532; 111 Agency Contact: Laura Nollen Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7505P Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703 305-7390
FAX: 703 305-5884
E-Mail: nollen.laura@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Barbara Madden Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7505P Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703 305-6463
FAX: 703 305-5884
E-Mail: madden.barbara@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ32

View Related Documents

Title: Regulations to Facilitate Compliance With the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act by Producers of PlantIncorporated Protectants (PIPs)

Abstract: Plant-Incorporated Protectants (PIPs) are pesticidal substances intended to be produced and used in living plants and the genetic material needed for their production. EPA regulates PIPs under Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) and the Federal Food Drug and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), including issuing experimental use permits and commercial registrations. In 2001, EPA published rules establishing much of the current regulatory structure for PIPs. This rulemaking effort is intended to address the issues that were not addressed in 2001, including defining the nature of regulated production of PIPs and associated issues such as reporting, product labeling and record keeping. The rule would affect those persons who produce PIPs and is expected to clarify the legal requirements of their products at various production phases, improving their ability to conduct business. It is expected to also improve the ability of the EPA to identify and respond to instances where there arepotentially significant violations. EPA also intends to address activities that the Agency does not believe warrant regulation and will consider exempting those activities, as appropriate, from FIFRA in whole or in part.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 174; 40 CFR 152; 40 CFR 156; 40 CFR 167; 40 CFR 168; 40 CFR 169; 40 CFR 172 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 7 USC 136a et seq Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

ANPRM 04/04/2007 72 FR 16312
Notice of Public Meeting 04/11/2007 72 FR 18191

ANPRM: Extension of Comment Period 05/23/2007 72 FR 28911

NPRM 10/00/2012

Additional Information: EPA publication information: ANPRM -http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=0900006480220026; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQOPP-2006-1003

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Federal; State; Tribal

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/biopesticides/pips/index.htm

Sectors Affected: 61131; 111; 32532; 54171 Agency Contact: Stephen Howie Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7201M Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-4146
FAX: 202 564-8502
E-Mail: Howie.Stephen@epa.gov Agency Contact: Kenneth Haymes Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7202M Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-0306
FAX: 202 564-8502
E-Mail: Haymes.Kenneth@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ34

View Related Documents

Title: Nonylphenol (NP) and its Ethoxylates (NPE); Significant New Use Rule & Test Rule

Abstract: This rulemaking proceeding was initiated in response to a citizen's petition filed in June 2007 under section 21 of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) requesting that EPA require manufacturers and importers of nonylphenol (NP) and nonylphenol ethoxylates (NPEs) to conduct certain health and safety studies under TSCA section 4. Based on its review of the information submitted in support of the petition, additional information obtained by EPA, and public comments, EPA granted the request to initiate a proceeding to require chronic aquatic toxicity testing. In order to develop a properly tailored test requirement that would provide EPA with sufficient data to make a reasoned evaluation of the environmental effects of NPEs, EPA commenced the proceeding by issuing an advance notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPRM) on June 15, 2009, that solicits public comment on several testing issues prior to the issuance of any proposed rule. EPA subsequently created an Action Plan to consider additional actions for these chemicals. The Action Plan for NP/NPE was posted to Agency website in August 2010. EPA is currently (July 2011) developing a combined proposed Significant New Use Rule (SNUR) and test rule for the chemicals. The SNUR would address some chemicals that have discontinued production, some chemicals that are only used as intermediates, and some chemicals that are being phased out by 2013-14. The test rule would address health and safety data, and especially environmental effects.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: NoCFR Citation: 40 CFR 721; 40 CFR 790 to 799 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 15 USC 2603 TSCA sec 5 and TSCA sec 4 Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

Other Statutory Settlement Agreement Deadline for Signature on ANPRM. 06/30/2009

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

ANPRM 06/17/2009 74 FR 28654

NPRM 08/00/2012

Additional Information: EPA publication information: ANPRM - http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=EPA-HQOPPT-2007-0490-0175; EPA Docket information: EPA–HQ–OPPT–2007–0490

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Federal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/opptintr/chemtest

Sectors Affected: 325; 32411 Agency Contact: John Schaeffer Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7405M Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-8173
FAX: 202 564-4765
E-Mail: Schaeffer.John@epa.gov Agency Contact: Jeffrey Taylor Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7405M Washington , DC 20004
Phone: 202 564-8828
FAX: 202 564-4775
E-Mail: taylor.jeffrey@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ44

View Related Documents

Title: Formaldehyde; Third-Party Certification Framework for the Formaldehyde Standards for Composite Wood Products

Abstract: In 2008, EPA initiated a proceeding under Toxics Substance and Control Act (TSCA) to investigate risks posed by formaldehyde emitted from pressed wood products. An advance notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPRM) sought to engage stakeholders to contribute to obtaining a better understanding of the available control technologies and approaches, industry practices, and the implementation of California's formaldehyde emission limits. Subsequently, EPA developed an industry survey to obtain more information on these ANPRM topics and continued to assess the hazards of and exposures to formaldehyde emissions from pressed wood products. On July 7, 2010, the Formaldehyde Standards for Composite Wood Products Act was enacted. This law amends TSCA to establish specific formaldehyde emission limits for hardwood plywood, particleboard, and medium-density fiberboard, which limits are identical to the California emission limits for these products. The law further requires EPA to promulgate implementing regulations by January 1, 2013. This rulemaking covers the mandate for EPA to promulgate regulations to address requirements for accrediting bodies and third-party certifiers. A separate regulatory agenda entry (RIN 2070-tbd) covers the mandate for EPA to promulgate regulations to implement the statutory formaldehyde emission standards for hardwood plywood, medium-density fiberboard, and particleboard sold, supplied, offered for sale, or manufactured (including imported) in the United States.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: Undetermined Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 15 USC 2697; TSCA sec 601 Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

Other Statutory 01/01/2013

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: EPA is concerned about the human health risks that may be presented by exposure to formaldehydeemissions from composite wood products, because formaldehyde is a probable human carcinogen and an eye, nose, and throat
irritant.

Legal Basis: TSCA title VI

Alternatives: TSCA title VI establishes national formaldehyde emission limits for hardwood plywood, particleboard, and medium-density fiberboard, and EPA has not been given the authority to change the limits. However, EPA will evaluate various implementation alternatives during the course of this rulemaking.

Costs and Benefits: EPA is currently evaluating the costs and benefits of this action.

Risks: EPA is currently evaluating the risks presented by exposure to formaldehyde emissions in excess of the statutory
limits.

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

ANPRM 12/03/2008 73 FR 73620

ANPRM: Extension of Comment Period 01/30/2009 74 FR 5632

NPRM 02/00/2012

Final Action 01/00/2013

Additional Information: EPA publication information: ANPRM - http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=09000064807cabb2; EPA Docket information: ANPRM stage: EPA-HQ-OPPT-2008-0627; NPRM Stage: EPA-HQ-OPPT-2011-0380

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Business Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Federalism: Undetermined Energy Affected: No International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise be of
international interest.

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/opptintr/chemtest/formaldehyde/index.html

Sectors Affected: 325199; 423110; 4441; 42321; 4421; 337; 42331; 45393; 321991; 336213; 423390; 325211; 321992; 441210; 336214; 3212 Agency Contact: Cindy Wheeler Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7404T Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-0484
E-Mail: Wheeler.Cindy@epa.gov Agency Contact: Lynn Vendinello Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7404T Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-0514
E-Mail: vendinello.lynn@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ46

View Related Documents

Title: Mercury; Regulation of Use in Certain Products

Abstract: Elemental mercury is well documented as a toxic, environmentally persistent substance that is atmospherically transported on a local, regional, and global scale. In addition, mercury can be environmentally transformed into methylmercury, which bioaccumulates, biomagnifies, and is highly toxic. EPA conducted a preliminary analysis of the costs, advantages, and disadvantages associated with mercury-free alternatives to certain mercury-containing products, and made a preliminary judgment that effective and economically feasible alternatives exist. These mercury-containing products include switches, relays/contactors, flame sensors, and button cell batteries. Therefore, EPA is evaluating whether an action (or combination of actions) under Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) is appropriate for mercury used in such products. As appropriate, such an action(s) would involve a group(s) of these products. Specifically, EPA will determine whether the continued use of mercury in one or more of these products would pose an unreasonable risk to human health and the environment.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: Undetermined Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 750 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations )Legal Authority: 15 USC 2605 Legal Deadline: None

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: Elemental mercury is well documented as a toxic, environmentally persistent substance that is atmospherically transported on a local, regional, and global scale. In addition, mercury can be environmentally transformed into methylmercury, which bioaccumulates, biomagnifies, and is highly toxic. Human health risks associated with elemental mercury and methylmercury are well documented. Humans can be exposed to mercury in products directly through inhalation of elemental mercury vapor and indirectly through ingestion of fish contaminated with methylmercury. EPA conducted apreliminary analysis of the costs, advantages, and disadvantages associated with mercury-free alternatives to certain mercurycontaining products, and made a preliminary judgment that effective and economically feasible alternatives exist. In its initial analysis of mercury in certain products, EPA considered mercury's well-documented toxicity, persistence, ability to bioaccumulate, ability to be environmentally transformed into methylmercury, and its demonstrated ability to be transported globally, as well as locally. EPA also considered the availability of effective and economically feasible alternatives for mercury in certain products. EPA believes manufacturing, processing, use, or disposal of elemental mercury in these products may result in significant potential for human and environmental exposures to elemental mercury and methylmercury.

Legal Basis: EPA is evaluating whether an action (or combination of actions) under Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), 15 U.S.C. 2601 et seq., is appropriate for mercury used in certain products. TSCA provides EPA with authority to require reporting, recordkeeping, and testing requirements, and restrictions relating to chemical substances and/or mixtures. Specifically, section 4 authorizes EPA to require testing of chemicals by manufacturers, importers, and processors where risks or exposures of concern are found. Section 5 authorizes EPA to require prior notice by manufacturers, importers, and processors when it identifies a "significant new use" that could result in exposures to, or releases of, a substance of concern. Section 6 gives EPA the authority to protect against unreasonable risk of injury to health or the environment from chemical substances. If EPA finds that there is a reasonable basis to conclude that the chemical's manufacture, processing, distribution, use or disposal presents an unreasonable risk, EPA may by rule take action to: Prohibit or limit manufacture, processing, or distribution in commerce; prohibit or limit the manufacture, processing, or distribution in commerce of the chemical substance above a specified concentration; require adequate warnings and instructions with respect to use, distribution, or disposal; require manufacturers or processors to make and retain records; prohibit or regulate any manner of commercial use; prohibit or regulate any manner of disposal; and/or require manufacturers or processors to give notice of the unreasonable risk of injury, and to recall products if required. Section 8 authorizes EPA to require reporting and recordkeeping by persons who manufacture, import, process,
and/or distribute chemical substances in commerce.

Alternatives: EPA conducted a preliminary analysis of the costs, advantages, and disadvantages associated with mercury-free alternatives to certain mercury-containing products, and made a preliminary judgment that effective and economically feasible
alternatives exist.

Costs and Benefits: As part of the economic, exposure, and risk assessment to support the current action, EPA is conducting a comprehensive use-substitute analysis and industry profile that will consider the costs and benefits of an action(or combination of actions) under Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). Those assessments consider the costs of mercurycontaining and mercury-free alternatives and the impact that any action would have on potentially affected stakeholders, including economic, human health, and environmental criteria.

Risks: As part of the economic, exposure, and risk assessment to support the current action, EPA is conducting a comprehensive use-substitute analysis and industry profile that will consider the risks associated with an action (or combination of actions) under Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). Those assessments consider the relative toxicity and other considerations associated with mercury-free alternatives to mercury-containing products and the impact that any action would have on potentially affected stakeholders, including economic, human health, and environmental criteria.

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 10/00/2012

Additional Information: SAN No. 5312

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: Undetermined Energy Affected: No International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise be of
international interest.

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/mercury/

Sectors Affected: 325188 Agency Contact: Thomas Groeneveld Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7404T Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-1188
FAX: 202 566-0469E-Mail: groeneveld.thomas@epa.gov Agency Contact: Lynn Vendinello Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7404T Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-0514
E-Mail: vendinello.lynn@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ47

View Related Documents

Title: Nanoscale Materials; Test Rule for Certain Nanoscale Materials

Abstract: EPA is developing a test rule under section 4(a) of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) to require manufacturers (defined by statute to include importers) and processors of the multiwall carbon nanotube described in Premanufacture Notice (PMN) P-08-199, certain clays (e.g., kaolin (including halloysite) and bentonite (including montmorillonite)), alumina, and spray-applied nanomaterials (the “chemical substances” or “chemicals”) to conduct testing for health effects, ecological effects, and environmental fate, as well as to provide material characterization data. The resulting data will assist EPA in understanding the effects of the substances to manage/minimize potential risk and exposure. Results will also help with establishing a correlation between the chemical/physical properties and health and environmental effects needed to protect the environment and the health of workers handling the substance.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 790 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 15 USC 2603 TSCA 4 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 03/00/2012

Additional Information: SAN No. 5313

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/opptintr/chemtest/index.htm

Sectors Affected: 325; 324 Agency Contact: Ken Moss Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7405M Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-9232
FAX: 202 564-9490
E-Mail: moss.kenneth@epa.gov Agency Contact: Zofia Kosim Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7405M Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-8733
FAX: 202 564-9490
E-Mail: kosim.zofia@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ54

View Related Documents

Title: Nanoscale Materials; Chemical Substances When Manufactured, Imported, or Processed as Nanoscale Materials; Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements; Significant New Use RuleAbstract: EPA is developing a proposal to establish reporting and recordkeeping requirements under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) for chemical substances when manufactured (defined by statute to include import) or processed as nanoscale materials. Specifically, EPA is developing a significant new use rule (SNUR) under TSCA section 5(a)(2) that would require persons who intend to manufacture, import, or process this/these chemical substance(s) for an activity that is designated as a significant new use by the proposed rule to notify EPA at least 90 days before commencing that activity. The required notification would provide EPA with the opportunity to evaluate the intended use and, if necessary, to prohibit or limit that activity before it occurs to prevent unreasonable risk to human health or the environment. In addition, EPA is developing a proposal to require reporting and recordkeeping under TSCA section 8(a), which would require that persons who manufacture these nanoscale materials notify EPA of certain information including production volume, methods of manufacture and processing, exposure and release information, and available health and safety data. The proposed reporting of these activities would provide EPA with an opportunity to evaluate the information and consider appropriate action under TSCA to reduce any risk to human health or the environment. (This description reflects the incorporation of the rulemaking effort identified under RIN 2070-AJ67 into this rulemaking effort, as those two efforts were combined into a single rulemaking.)

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 704 and 721 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 15 USC 2604(a) TSCA 5(a); 15 USC 2607(a) TSCA 8(a) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Action 00/00/0000

NPRM 03/00/2012

Additional Information: Merged with RIN 2070-AJ67 because the rulemakings were combined into a single proposal; EPA
Docket information: EPA–HQ–OPPT–2010-0572

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/oppt/nano/

Sectors Affected: 325; 324 Agency Contact: Jim Alwood Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7405M Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-8974
FAX: 202 564-9490
E-Mail: Alwood.Jim@epa.gov Agency Contact: Jessica Barkas Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7405M Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 250-8880
E-Mail: Barkas.Jessica@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ56

View Related Documents

Title: Lead; Renovation, Repair, and Painting Program for Public and Commercial Buildings

Abstract: Section 402(c)(3) of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) requires EPA to regulate renovation or remodeling activities in target housing (most pre-1978 housing), pre-1978 public buildings, and commercial buildings that create lead-based paint hazards. On April 22, 2008, EPA issued a final rule to address lead-based paint hazards created by these activities in target housing and child-occupied facilities built before 1978 (child-occupied facilities are a subset of public and commercial buildings or facilities where children under age 6 spend a great deal of time). The 2008 rule established requirements for training renovators, other renovation workers, and dust sampling technicians; for certifying renovators, dust sampling technicians, and renovation firms; for accrediting providers of renovation and dust sampling technician training; for renovation work practices; and for recordkeeping. This new rulemaking will address renovation or remodeling activities in the remainingbuildings described in TSCA section 402(c)(3): Public buildings built before 1978 and commercial buildings that are not childoccupied facilities. On May 6, 2010, EPA announced the commencement of proceedings to propose lead-safe work practicesand other requirements for renovations on the exteriors of public and commercial buildings and to determine whether leadbased paint hazards are created by interior renovation, repair, and painting projects in public and commercial buildings. Forthose renovations in the interiors of public and commercial buildings that create lead-based paint hazards, EPA will propose regulations to address these hazards.

Priority: Economically Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: Yes Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 745 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 15 USC 2682(c)(3) Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

Other Judicial Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, deadline from settlement agreement. 04/22/2010

NPRM Judicial Deadline from settlement agreement and subsequent renegotiation with litigants. 06/15/2012

Other Judicial Deadline from settlement agreement and subsequent renegotiation with litigants. 02/15/2014

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: This rulemaking is being undertaken in response to a settlement agreement and is designed to help insure that individuals and firms conducting renovation, repair, and painting activities in and on public and commercial buildings will do so in a way that safeguards the environment and protects the health of building occupants and nearby residents, especially children under 6 years old. Lead is known to cause deleterious health effects on multiple organ systems through diverse mechanisms of action in both adults and children. This array of health effects includes effects on heme biosynthesis and related functions, neurological development and function, reproduction and physical development, kidney function, cardiovascular function, and immune function. EPA has conducted several studies and reviewed additional information that indicates that the renovation of buildings containing lead-based paint can create health hazards in the form of lead-based paint dust under typical industry work practices.

Legal Basis: Section 402(c)(3) of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) requires EPA to regulate renovation or remodeling activities that create lead-based paint hazards in target housing, public buildings built before 1978, and commercial buildings.

Alternatives: For those activities that EPA determines create lead-based paint hazards, EPA will evaluate options to address the hazards. These options are likely to include different combinations of work practices and worker training and certification.

Costs and Benefits: Not yet determined.

Risks: Not yet determined.

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

ANPRM 05/06/2010 75 FR 24848

ANPRM Comment Period End 07/06/2010

NPRM 06/00/2012

Final Action 02/00/2014

Additional Information: EPA publication information: ANPRM -http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=0900006480ae7eb8; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQOPPT-2010-0173

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Business Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Federalism: Undetermined Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/lead/pubs/renovation.htm

Sectors Affected: 236; 921; 561210; 531; 238 Agency Contact: Hans Scheifele Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7404T Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-3122
E-Mail: Scheifele.Hans@epa.gov Agency Contact: Cindy Wheeler Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7404T Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-0484
E-Mail: Wheeler.Cindy@epa.govEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ61

View Related Documents

Title: Pesticides; Clarifying Changes to Labeling

Abstract: EPA is planning a rulemaking to make minor revisions to 40 CFR part 156, Labeling Requirements for Pesticides and Devices. The purpose of this effort is to update the structure of the regulation and make several clarifying changes. In addition to these planned minor revisions, EPA will solicit suggestions from stakeholders on what the Agency might consider for future changes to the labeling regulations.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 156 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 7 USC 136 et seq Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 07/00/2012

Additional Information: SAN No. 5393

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/regulating/labels/productlabels.htm

Sectors Affected: 32532 Agency Contact: Rame Cromwell Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7506P Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703 308-9068
FAX: 703 305-5884
E-Mail: Cromwell.Rame@epa.gov Agency Contact: Rose Kyprianou Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7506P Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703 305-5354
FAX: 703 305-5884
E-Mail: kyprianou.rose@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ63

View Related Documents

Title: TSCA Reporting Requirements; Revisions

Abstract: EPA is developing a proposal to change an existing reporting requirement under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) to provide for quicker review of health and environmental data for more effective protection of public health and the environment and increased transparency. Specifically EPA is considering changes to 40 CFR 792.185, entitled "Reporting of Study Results" to include "Robust Summaries" of test results with the submission of test data. Robust summaries are intended to provide sufficient information to allow a technically qualified person to make an independent assessment of a given study report without having to go back to the full study report, and to also allow evaluation of the proposed test plan. A robust summary therefore reflects the objectives, methods, results, and conclusions of the full study report, which can either be an experiment or in some cases an estimation or prediction method.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 799 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations )Legal Authority: 15 USC 2601 et seq Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 05/00/2012

Additional Information: Includes Retrospective Review under EO 13563.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/opptintr/chemtest/pubs/sct4rule.html

Sectors Affected: 325 Agency Contact: Mike Matthiesien Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7405M Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-3077
FAX: 202 564-4765
E-Mail: mattheisen.mike@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ64

View Related Documents

Title: Lead Wheel Weights; Regulatory Investigation

Abstract: In 2009, EPA initiated a proceeding under the Toxics Substances Control Act (TSCA) to investigate potential lead hazards associated with the manufacture, processing, and distribution in commerce of lead wheel balancing weights ("wheel weights"). Lead is highly toxic, especially to young children. According to a U.S. Geological Survey study in 2003, 65,000 tons of lead wheel weights were in use in the United States and approximately 2,000 tons of these weights were lost from vehicles into the environment. Voluntary actions on the part of U.S. auto manufactures and an European Union ban on their use has reduced the number of lead wheel weights, but they continue to be predominant product in the tire replacement market.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: Undetermined Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 15 USC 2601 et seq Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Action 00/00/0000

NPRM 10/00/2012

Additional Information: SAN No. 5398

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Local; State; Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: Undetermined Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/lead/ Agency Contact: Mark Henshall Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7404T Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-0523
FAX: 202 566-0471
E-Mail: henshall.mark@epa.gov Agency Contact: Michelle Price Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7404TWashington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-0744

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ65

View Related Documents

Title: Microorganisms: General Exemptions From Reporting Requirements; Revisions of Recipient Organisms Eligible for Tier I and Tier II Exemptions

Abstract: In 1997, EPA promulgated a final rule under section 5 of Toxic Substances and Control Act (TSCA) to establish the notification procedures for review of certain new microorganisms before they are introduced into commerce. "New" microorganisms are those formed by deliberate combinations of genetic material from organisms classified in different taxonomic genera. This review process is designed to prevent unreasonable risk of injury to human health and the environment without imposing unnecessary regulatory burdens on the biotechnology industry. The rule also established TSCA section 5(h)(4) exemptions from full reporting when 10 specific microorganisms are used as the recipient microorganisms for the introduced genetic material and placed requirements on these recipient microorganism, the introduced genetic material, and the physical containment (40 CFR 725, subpart G). The rule also established a mechanism (40 CFR 725.67) for the public to petition the Agency to propose additional recipient microorganisms for such exemptions. These regulations describe the appropriate supporting information that must be submitted with the petition to provide EPA with a starting point for determining whether the recipient should be listed as a candidate for the tiered exemption. EPA has received petitions to add two additional microorganisms to the eligible recipient microorganisms listed in 40 CFR 725.420 (Trichoderma reesei and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens). EPA is evaluating the information provided in these petitions. If, as result of this evaluation, EPA makes a preliminary determination that one or both of the two microorganisms will not present an unreasonable risk of injury to health or the environment, then EPA will propose a rule to grant the exemption petition for that microorganism(s).

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 15 USC 2601 et seq Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 02/00/2012

Additional Information: SAN No. 5418

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/oppt/

Sectors Affected: 325 Agency Contact: Brian Lee Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7405M Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-6293
E-Mail: lee.brian@epa.gov Agency Contact: Greg Schweer Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7405M Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-8469
FAX: 202 564-9094
E-Mail: Schweer.Greg@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ66

View Related Documents

Title: High Production Volume (HPV) Chemicals; 4th Group of ChemicalsAbstract: High production volume (HPV) chemicals are manufactured (including imported) in the aggregate at more than 1 million pounds on an annual basis. This rulemaking effort, which is part of a series of rules under development for HPV chemicals, addresses what EPA refers to as the fourth group of chemicals (currently expected to include a total of 45 chemicals) identified under the HPV Program. Specifically, EPA is developing a test rule under section 4(a)(1)(B) of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) and a significant new use rule (SNUR) under section 5(a)(2) of TSCA for the fourth group of HPV chemicals identified under the HPV Program. The test rule is currently expected to propose testing and recordkeeping requirements for 23 chemicals. The specific testing may vary based on the data needs identified for the particular chemical to which it applies, but the data generally collected under the test rule would include: acute toxicity, repeat dose toxicity, developmental and reproductive toxicity, mutagenicity, ecotoxicity, and environmental fate. Data developed under this test rule would provide critical information about the environmental fate and potential hazards associated with these chemicals which, when combined with information about exposure and uses, would allow the Agency and others to evaluate potential health and environmental risks and to take appropriate follow-up action. The proposed SNUR is currently expected to apply to 22 chemicals, and would require persons who intend to manufacture, import, or process the chemical substances for an activity that is designated as a significant new use by this proposed rule to notify EPA at least 90 days before commencing that activity The notice required by the SNUR would provide EPA the opportunity to evaluate intended significant new uses and associated activities before they occur and, if appropriate, to prohibit or limit those uses or activities.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 721; 40 CFR 790 to 799 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 15 USC 2601 et seq Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 10/21/2011 76 FR 65580

NPRM Comment Period End 01/19/2012

Final Rule 06/00/2013

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OPPT-2010-0520

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/oppt/existingchemicals/

Sectors Affected: 325; 324110 Agency Contact: Paul Campanella Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7405M Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-8091
E-Mail: Campanella.Paul@epa.gov Agency Contact: Amy Breedlove Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7405M Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-9823
FAX: 202 564-4775
E-Mail: breedlove.amy@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ70

View Related Documents

Title: Chemicals of Concern List Under Section 5(b)(4) of the Toxic Substances Control Act

Abstract: EPA is proposing to add a category of eight phthalates, a category of polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), and bisphenol A (BPA) to a list of chemical substances that EPA finds present or may present an unreasonable risk of injury to human health or the environment. EPA is proposing this rule using the authority provided under section 5(b)(4) the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). EPA is concerned that the hazards of these substances and the magnitude of human and/or environmental exposure indicates that they may present an unreasonable risk to human health and/or the environment. EPA is also proposing conforming changes to the TSCA 12(b) export notification regulations.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed RuleMajor: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 720 and 707 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 15 USC 2604 and 2611 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Action 00/00/0000

NPRM 03/00/2012

Additional Information: SAN No. 5430

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/oppt/existingchemicals/pubs/managechemrisk.html

Sectors Affected: 325 Agency Contact: Jessica Barkas Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7405M Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 250-8880
E-Mail: Barkas.Jessica@epa.gov Agency Contact: Maria Doa Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7404T Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-0718
E-Mail: Doa.Maria@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ73

View Related Documents

Title: Significant New Use Rule (SNUR); Benzidine-Based Dyes; Di-n-pentyl phthalate (DnPP); and Alkanes, C12-13, Chloro

Abstract: Under section 5(a)(2) of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), EPA intends to propose adding nine chemicals (dyes) to the benzidine-based chemical substances (dyes) Significant New Use Rule (SNUR) at 40 CFR section 721.1660; to create a SNUR for Di-n-pentyl phthalate (DnPP) (1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic acid, 1,2-dipentyl ester ) CASRN number 131-18-0; and to create a SNUR for Alkanes, C12-13, chloro (CASRN: 71011-12-6). The proposed SNURs would require persons who intend to manufacture, import, or process these chemical substances for an activity that is designated as a significant new use by this proposed rule to notify EPA at least 90 days before commencing that activity. In the case of the benzidine-based dyes, the proposed rule would also require persons who intend to import or process the chemicals as part of an article to notify EPA at least 90 days before commencing that activity. The required notification would provide EPA with the opportunity to evaluate the intended use and, if necessary, to prohibit or limit that activity before it occurs. For benzidine-based chemical substances (dyes) this amendment does not revoke the exemptions granted at 40 CFR section 721.1660(a)(2) for uses as laboratory stains and other analytical reagents. However, this amendment does propose to revoke the Article Exemption described in 40 CFR section 721.45(f) for the chemicals previously listed in 40 CFR section 721.1660(a)(2) as well as for the nine benzidine-based dyes included in this proposed SNUR.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 721 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 15 USC 2601 et seq Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Action 00/00/0000

NPRM 12/00/2011

Additional Information: This action has been merged with 2070-AJ78 and 2070-AJ81.Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/oppt/newchems/pubs/snun.htm

Sectors Affected: 325 Agency Contact: Sara Kemme Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7404T Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-0511
FAX: 202 566-0473
E-Mail: kemme.sara@epa.gov Agency Contact: Lynn Vendinello Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7404T Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-0514
E-Mail: vendinello.lynn@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ75

View Related Documents

Title: Electronic Reporting Under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA)

Abstract: EPA is proposing to replace paper reporting with electronic reporting of the information that must be submitted under the Toxics Substance Control Act (TSCA) sections 4 (including enforceable consent agreements (ECAs), 5, 8(a) Preliminary Assessment Information Rule (PAIR), and 8(d). In addition, EPA is amending TSCA section 5 reporting regulations at 40 CFR 720, 40 CFR 723, and 40 CFR 725 to electronic reporting for Notices of Commencement of Manufacture of Import (NOCs) and support documents (e.g. correspondence, amendments, test data) relating to TSCA section 5 notices submitted to EPA prior to April 6, 2010, the effective date of the electronic-PMN final rule. A Notice providing guidance pertaining to TSCA section 8(e) "Notification of Substantial Risk" will also be issued indicating that EPA will accept 8(e) notices submitters might choose to submit electronically to the Agency. Both actions are intended to streamline the reporting process, reduce the administrative costs associated with submission and recordkeeping required for the rules, and establish standards for using EPA’s Central Data Exchange (CDX), which provides a single portal to enable electronic submission of forms, reports, and other documents to the Agency.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 712; 40 CFR 716; 40 CFR 790 to 799; 40 CFR 720; 40 CFR 725 (To search for a specific CFR, visit

the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 15 USC 2601 et seq Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 12/00/2011

Additional Information: Includes Retrospective Review under EO 13563.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/oppt/

Sectors Affected: 325; 32411 Agency Contact: Katherine Sleasman Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7405M Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-7716
FAX: 202 564-4775
E-Mail: sleasman.katherine@epa.gov Agency Contact: Barbara Leczynski Environmental Protection AgencyOffice of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7407M Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-8164
FAX: 202 564-7490
E-Mail: leczynski.barbara@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ79

View Related Documents

Title: Pesticides; Revisions to Minimum Risk Exemptions

Abstract: EPA has determined that the current listing of active ingredients and references to inert ingredients in 40 CFR 152.25(f) should be made clearer to facilitate manufacturing processes, enforcement, and consumer choice among products. In this action, EPA will explore options for clarifying the active and inert ingredient listings, including both rule and non-rule actions.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 152.25 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 7 USC 136(a); 7 USC 136(w) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 02/00/2012

Additional Information: Split from RIN 2070-AJ45; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0305

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Federal; State

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/

Sectors Affected: 3251; 32532 Agency Contact: Niva Kramek Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7506P Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703 605-1193
FAX: 703 305-5884
E-Mail: Kramek.Niva@epa.gov Agency Contact: Kathryn Boyle Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7506P Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703 305-6304
FAX: 703 305-5884
E-Mail: Boyle.Kathryn@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ87

View Related Documents

Title: CBI: PMN Amendments Claiming Chemical and Microorganism Identity as Confidential in Data From Health and Safety
Studies Submitted Under TSCA Prior to the Commencement of Manufacture

Abstract: EPA is developing proposed amendments to its new chemical and microorganism premanufacture regulations with respect to the information submitted to the EPA under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). The EPA is developing regulations so that the procedures for claiming chemical or microorganism identity as confidential business information (CBI) in data from health and safety studies are consistent with the language of section 14(b) of TSCA. As a general rule, TSCA section 14(b)(1) provides that health and safety studies and data from health and safety studies are not entitled to confidential treatment, with an exception for information that "discloses processes used in the manufacturing or processing of a chemical substance or mixture," or, in the case of a mixture, where release of the data discloses the portion of a mixture comprised by a particularsubstance. Chemical identity is part of a health and safety study. As such, chemical identity associated with a health and safety study is not entitled to confidential treatment unless it falls into the exemption under TSCA section 14(b)(1). This action would increase transparency related to chemicals and microorganisms undergoing review prior to the commencement of manufacture, and is also likely to increase the availability to the general public of health and safety data on chemicals in commerce.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 720.90(c); 40 CFR 725.92(c); 40 CFR 72 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 15 USC 2613 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Action 00/00/0000

NPRM 04/00/2012

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/oppt/existingchemicals/pubs/transparency.html

Sectors Affected: 325 Agency Contact: Ryan Wallace Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7408M Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-8824
E-Mail: Wallace.Ryan@epa.gov Agency Contact: Scott Sherlock Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7408M Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-8257
FAX: 202 564-8251
E-Mail: Sherlock.Scott@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ88

View Related Documents

Title: Significant New Use Rule (SNUR); HBCD (Hexabromocyclododecane) Used in Textiles

Abstract: EPA is proposing a significant new use rule (SNUR) under section 5(a)(2) of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) for the use of HBCD (Hexabromocyclododecane) in consumer textiles. HBCD is a brominated flame retardant used in polystyrene foam for thermal insulation boards, in electrical and electronic applications, and textiles. The chemical is found world-wide in the environment and wildlife. HBCD is transported long distances in the environment, it bioaccumulates and biomagnifies in the food chain, and is highly toxic to aquatic organisms. Human exposure is evidenced from its presence in breast milk, adipose tissue, and blood. Animal test results indicate that HBCD causes potential reproductive, developmental and neurological effects. EPA has evidence to suggest that the use of HBCD in textiles may be limited to specialty commercial applications. EPA believes that use of HBCD in consumer textiles (other than use in textiles in motor vehicles, which is ongoing) would constitute a significant new use. The SNUR would require persons who intend to manufacture, import, or process HBCD for the designated significant new use to notify EPA at least 90 days before commencing such use. The required notification would provide EPA with the opportunity to evaluate the intended use and, if necessary, to prohibit or limit that activity before it

occurs.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 721 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 15 USC 2601 et seq Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR CiteFinal Action 00/00/0000

NPRM 01/00/2012

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OPPT-2011-0489

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/oppt/existingchemicals/

Sectors Affected: 325 Agency Contact: Sue Slotnick Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7404T Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-1973
E-Mail: slotnick.sue@epa.gov Agency Contact: Lynn Vendinello Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7404T Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-0514
E-Mail: vendinello.lynn@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ89

View Related Documents

Title: Cadmium; Health and Safety Data Reporting Under TSCA Section 8(d)

Abstract: On August 30, 2010, EPA granted a request from the Sierra Club to use section 8(d) of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) to require producers, importers, and processors of cadmium and cadmium compounds to submit to EPA lists or copies of ongoing and completed unpublished health and safety studies concerning cadmium and cadmium compounds that are reasonably likely to be incorporated into consumer products. Sierra Club made this request May 28, 2010, through a citizen's petition filed under TSCA section 21. The petition also asked that the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) take certain actions, including the establishment of standards restricting cadmium in children's products, especially metal jewelry. The health and safety studies that EPA would require under this rule would be used to help determine if a potential hazard exists from cadmium or cadmium compounds and whether a product should be banned as a hazardous substance under guidelines established by CPSC.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 716 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 15 USC 2607(d) TSCA 8(d) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 07/00/2012

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Federal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/lead/pubs/toyjewelry.htm Agency Contact: Robert Jones Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7405M Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-8161
FAX: 202 564-4745
E-Mail: Jones.Robert@epa.gov Agency Contact: Mark Seltzer Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances7405M Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-2910
E-Mail: Seltzer.Mark@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ91

View Related Documents

Title: Significant New Use Rule for Toluene Diisocyanates (TDI)

Abstract: EPA is proposing a significant new use rule (SNUR) under section 5(a)(2) of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) for toluene diisocyanates (TDI) in consumer products. This action would require persons who intend to manufacture, import, or process the chemical substance for the designated significant new uses to notify EPA at least 90 days before commencing such manufacture, import, or processing. The required notification would provide EPA with the opportunity to evaluate the intended use and, if necessary, to prohibit or limit that activity before it occurs.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 721 (revision) (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 15 USC 2604(a) TSCA 5(a) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 07/00/2012

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/oppt/existingchemicals/pubs/actionplans/tdi.html

Sectors Affected: 325 Agency Contact: Katherine Sleasman Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7405M Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-7716
FAX: 202 564-4775
E-Mail: sleasman.katherine@epa.gov Agency Contact: Amy Breedlove Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7405M Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-9823
FAX: 202 564-4775
E-Mail: breedlove.amy@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AC46

View Related Documents

Title: Groundwater and Pesticide Management Plan Rule

Abstract: As proposed, this regulation would have established Pesticide Management Plans (PMPs) as a new regulatory requirement for certain pesticides. Unless a State or tribal authority had an EPA-approved Plan specifying risk reduction measures, use of the chemical would be prohibited. The rule would also specify procedures and deadlines for development, approval and modification of plans by States and tribal authorities. Several parameters of the program described in the proposed rule were reconsidered to determine whether the program could address water quality issues rather than ground-water only, and to determine the best partnership approach to implementation. During this period, the risk level associated with the named pesticides was reexamined and reduced. Moreover, since the proposal in 1996, many States have adopted the original concept and framework of Pesticide Management Plans and these programs are operational today. This experience and growth in knowledge has exceeded the requirements and specifications of the original proposal. Accordingly, EPA intends to withdraw theproposed rule in the near future.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 152.170 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 7 USC 136(a) FIFRA sec 3; 7 USC 136(w) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 06/26/1996 61 FR 33259

Notice; Metolachlor 02/23/2000 65 FR 8925
Supplemental Notice & Extension of Comment Period 03/24/2000 65 FR 15885

Notice: Withdrawal of NPRM 12/00/2011

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM - http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-PEST/1996/June/Day-26/pr768.html

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/

Sectors Affected: 9241 Agency Contact: Rose Kyprianou Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7506P Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703 305-5354
FAX: 703 305-5884
E-Mail: kyprianou.rose@epa.gov Agency Contact: Scott Drewes Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7506P Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703 347-0107
E-Mail: drewes.scott@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AD14

View Related Documents

Title: Pesticides; Registration Requirements for Antimicrobial Pesticide Products

Abstract: In 1999, EPA proposed to establish procedures primarily directed at implementing provisions of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) requiring EPA to issue regulations streamlining its management of the registration process for antimicrobial pesticides, and the main body of the proposal addressed antimicrobial procedures and policies. EPA also proposed to implement a number of general provisions of FIFRA that were not specific to antimicrobial pesticides. In 2001, EPA finalized the provisions not specific to antimicrobial pesticides. This final rule did not promulgate proposed provisions aimed at addressing antimicrobial registration procedures and policies. The implementation of Pesticide Registration Improvement Act (PRIA) addressed registration procedures and policies for all pesticides, including antimicrobial pesticides, and the Agency has determined that a final rule for the remaining provisions in the 1999 proposal is not necessary. Accordingly, EPA intends to withdraw this action in the near future.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 152 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 7 USC 136a(h); 7 USC 136(w) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 09/17/1999 64 FR 50671

NPRM Extension of Comment Period 11/16/1999 64 FR 62145

Final Action 1 12/14/2001 66 FR 64759Notice: Withdrawal of NPRM 12/00/2011

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM - http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi? dbname=1999_register&docid=fr17se99-30.pdf; EPA Docket information: OPP-300890

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/oppad001/regpolicy.htm

Sectors Affected: 32519; 32532; 32551; 32561 Agency Contact: Rose Kyprianou Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7506P Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703 305-5354
FAX: 703 305-5884
E-Mail: kyprianou.rose@epa.gov Agency Contact: Scott Drewes Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7506P Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703 347-0107
E-Mail: drewes.scott@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AD16

View Related Documents

Title: High Production Volume (HPV) Chemicals; 1st Group of Chemicals

Abstract: High production volume (HPV) chemicals are manufactured (including imported) in the aggregate at more than 1 million pounds on an annual basis. The HPV Program, officially launched in late 1998, was created to ensure that a baseline set of data on approximately 2,800 HPV chemicals would be made available to EPA and the public. Chemicals were identified for this program through data reported under the TSCA Inventory Update Rule (IUR) during 1990. Mechanisms to collect or, where necessary, develop needed data on these HPV chemicals include the voluntary HPV Challenge Program, certain international efforts, and test rules issued under section 4 of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). The first in a series of test rules under TSCA section 4(a)(1)(B), was proposed in 2000 and applied to what is now known as the "first group" of 37 identified chemicals. See separate entries for information about the other groups of HPV chemicals. Although the testing varied based on the specific data needs identified for the particular chemical, the data generally collected under this rule includes: acute toxicity, repeat dose toxicity, developmental and reproductive toxicity, mutagenicity, ecotoxicity, and environmental fate. Data developed under this rule will provide critical information about the environmental fate and potential hazards associated with these chemicals which, when combined with information about exposure and uses, will allow the Agency and others to evaluate potential health and environmental risks and to take appropriate follow-up action. When finalized in March 2006, the number of chemicals included in the first final rule was reduced to 17 based on new information on annual production volumes, worker exposure, and commitments to the voluntary HPV Challenge Program. In December 2006, based on new information indicating a lack of potential substantial worker exposure, the Agency revoked the requirements for coke-oven light oil (coal) (CAS No. 65996-78-3) from the HPV test rule. In 2011, EPA expects to remove the requirements for another chemical.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 790 to 799 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 15 USC 2601 et seq Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 12/26/2000 65 FR 81658

Final Action 03/16/2006 71 FR 13709
Direct Final Action1; Revocation; Coke-Oven Light Oil (Coal) 12/08/2006 71 FR 71058

Direct Final Action 2; Revocation 12/00/2011

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM - http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-TOX/2000/December/Day26/t32497.htm; In November 2010, the original RIN was split to create separate entries to track the rules by HPV chemical groups; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OPPT-2005-0033Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No Energy Affected: No International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise be of
international interest.

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/opptintr/chemtest

Sectors Affected: 325; 32411 Agency Contact: Catherine Roman Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7405M Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-8172
FAX: 202 564-4765
E-Mail: Roman.Catherine@epa.gov Agency Contact: John Schaeffer Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7405M Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-8173
FAX: 202 564-4765
E-Mail: Schaeffer.John@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AD30

View Related Documents

Title: Pesticides; Data Requirements for Antimicrobials

Abstract: EPA is updating and revising its pesticide data requirements for antimicrobial pesticide products. The existing antimicrobial data requirements are in 40 CFR part 161. This action will revise the existing data requirements to reflect current regulatory and scientific standards. The data requirements will cover all scientific disciplines for antimicrobial pesticides, including product chemistry and residue chemistry, toxicology, and environmental fate and effects. In general, pesticide data requirements are codified in 40 CFR part 158, which describes the minimum data and information EPA typically requires to support an application for pesticide registration or amendment; support the maintenance of a pesticide registration by means of the data call-in process, e.g., as used in the registration review program; or establish or maintain a tolerance or exemption from the requirements of a tolerance for a pesticide chemical residue. This part establishes general policies and procedures associated with the submission of data in support of a pesticide regulatory action. It does not, however, include study protocols, methodology, or standards for conducting or reporting test results; nor does this part describe how the Agency uses or evaluates the data and information in its risk assessment and risk management decisions, or the regulatory determinations that may be based upon the data. Once this regulatory change takes effect, data requirements for antimicrobial pesticides will be set forth in subpart W of 40 CFR part 158, and part 161 will be removed.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 158 and 161 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 7 USC 136 to 136(y) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 10/08/2008 73 FR 59381

Final Action 02/00/2012

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM - http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=EPA-HQ-OPP2008-0110-0001; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OPP-2008-0110

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/oppad001/

Sectors Affected: 32519; 32551; 32532; 32561 Agency Contact: Kathryn Boyle Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances7506P Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703 305-6304
FAX: 703 305-5884
E-Mail: Boyle.Kathryn@epa.gov Agency Contact: Nader Elkassabany Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7506P Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703 308-8783
FAX: 703 308-8481
E-Mail: elkassabany.nader@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AD55

View Related Documents

Title: Plant Incorporated Protectants (PIPs); Exemption for Those Derived Through Genetic Engineering From Sexually Compatible Plants

Abstract: EPA has determined that the record for this action, which was originally proposed in 1994, does not address the scientific information developed since the original proposal. Consequently, the record would not provide adequate, up-to-date support for the proposed rule. In 1994, EPA believed that the proposed exemption for plant-incorporated protectants (PIPs) derived through genetic engineering from plants sexually compatible with the recipient plant had the potential to cover a number of low-risk products. However, experience in the last decade has shown that such PIPs have not been developed in great numbers. If EPA were to pursue such an exemption in the future, the Agency would issue a new proposed rule. As such, EPA intends to withdraw the proposals. Withdrawing the proposals does not preclude EPA’s pursuing the same approach in the future. If withdrawn, the Agency would create a new entry in the Regulatory Agenda once the Agency decided to pursue such a rulemaking in the future.

Priority: Info./Admin./Other Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 174 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 7 USC 136 et seq; 21 USC 346(a) et seq Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 11/23/1994 59 FR 60496
Supplemental NPRM 1 07/22/1996 61 FR 37891
Supplemental NPRM 2 05/16/1997 62 FR 27132
Supplemental NPRM 3 04/23/1999 64 FR 19958
Supplemental NPRM 4 07/19/2001 66 FR 37855
Supplemental NPRM 5 08/20/2001 66 FR 43552

Notice; Withdrawal of NPRMs 12/00/2011

Additional Information: SAN No. 4611

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/biopesticides/pips/index.htm

Sectors Affected: 61131; 111; 32532; 54171 Agency Contact: Elizabeth Milewski Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7202M Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-8492
FAX: 202 564-8501
E-Mail: Milewski.Elizabeth@epa.gov Agency Contact: Keith Matthews Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7511P Washington , DC 20460Phone: 703 308-8712
FAX: 703 308-7026
E-Mail: Matthews. Keith@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AD56

View Related Documents

Title: Plant Incorporated Protectants (PIPs); Exemption for PIPs That Act by Primarily Affecting the Plant

Abstract: EPA has determined that the record for this action, which was originally proposed in 1994, does not address the scientific information developed since the original proposal. Consequently, the record would not provide adequate, up-to-date support for the proposed rule. In 1994, EPA believed that the proposed exemption for plant-incorporated protectants (PIPs) that act by primarily affecting the plant had the potential to cover a number of low-risk products. However, experience in the last decade has shown that such PIPs have not been developed in great numbers. If EPA were to pursue such an exemption in the future, the Agency would issue a new proposed rule. As such, EPA intends to withdraw the proposals. Withdrawing the proposals does not preclude EPA’s pursuing the same approach in the future. If withdrawn, the Agency would create a new entry in the Regulatory Agenda once the Agency decided to pursue such a rulemaking in the future.

Priority: Info./Admin./Other Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 174 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 7 USC 136 et seq; 21 USC 346a et seq Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite
NPRM Original 11/23/1994 59 FR 60496
Supplemental NPRM 07/22/1996 61 FR 37891
Supplemental NPRM 2 05/16/1997 62 FR 27132
Supplemental NPRM 3 04/23/1999 64 FR 19958
Supplemental NPRM 4 07/19/2001 66 FR 37855

Notice; Withdrawal of NPRMs 12/00/2011

Additional Information: SAN No. 4612

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/biopesticides/pips/index.htm

Sectors Affected: 6113; 111; 32532; 54171 Agency Contact: Elizabeth Milewski Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7202M Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-8492
FAX: 202 564-8501
E-Mail: Milewski.Elizabeth@epa.gov Agency Contact: Keith Matthews Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7511P Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703 308-8712
FAX: 703 308-7026
E-Mail: Matthews. Keith@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ51

View Related Documents

Title: Mercury; Incorporation of Revised ASTM Standards Into EPA Regulations That Provide Flexibility in the Use ofAlternatives to Mercury-Containing Thermometers

Abstract: EPA proposed to incorporate the most recent versions of the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) International standards (ASTM standards) into EPA regulations that provide flexibility to use alternatives to mercury-containing industrial thermometers. The proposed amendments will allow the use of such alternatives in certain limited field and laboratory applications previously impermissible as part of compliance with EPA regulations. In addition, EPA sought public input on the need to address the remaining EPA regulations that incorporate by reference ASTM standards that do not allow the use of alternatives to mercury-containing industrial thermometers. EPA believes these ASTM standards may unnecessarily impede the use of effective, comparable, and available mercury alternatives. Due to elemental mercury's high toxicity, EPA is working to reduce potential mercury exposures to humans and the environment by reducing the overall use of mercury-containing products, including mercury-containing thermometers.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 49; 40 CFR 60; 40 CFR 63; 40 CFR 75; 40 CFR 86; 40 CFR 89; 40 CFR 92; 40 CFR 93; 40 CFR 761;
40 CFR 1065 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 to 7671q; 15 USC 1601 et seq Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 01/12/2011 76 FR 2056

Final Action 12/00/2011

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM - http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=EPA-HQ-OPPT2010-0518-0001; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OPPT-2010-0518

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/mercury/

Sectors Affected: 334516; 324110; 541380 Agency Contact: Robert Courtnage Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7404T Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-1081
E-Mail: courtnage.robert@epa.gov Agency Contact: Hiroshi Dodahara Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7404T Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-0507
E-Mail: dodahara.hiroshi@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ53

View Related Documents

Title: Pesticides; Regulation to Clarify Labeling of Pesticides for Export

Abstract: EPA is clarifying, restructuring, and adding specificity to existing labeling regulations for the export of unregistered pesticide products and devices. EPA is also adding a minor new requirement for the labeling of unregistered pesticide products and devices shipped between establishments operated by the same producer to ensure that they are clearly marked as unregistered products intended for export in order to prevent them from inadvertently entering the U.S. market.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 168.65 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 7 USC 136 to 136(y) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 04/06/2011 76 FR 18995Final Action 04/00/2012

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM - http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=EPA-HQ-OPP2009-0607-0004; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OPP-2009-0607

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://epa.gov/compliance/monitoring/programs/fifra/importexport.html

Sectors Affected: 325 Agency Contact: Vera Au Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7506P Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703 308-9069
FAX: 703 305-5884
E-Mail: Au.Vera@epa.gov Agency Contact: Martha Shimkin Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7506P Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703 305-5160
E-Mail: Shimkin.martha@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ58

View Related Documents

Title: Pesticides; Satisfaction of Data Requirements; Minor Revisions to the Procedures to Ensure Protection of Data Submitters' Rights

Abstract: EPA proposed revisions to its regulations governing procedures for the satisfaction of data requirements under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), which are codified in 40 CFR part 152, subpart E. These provisions include, among other things, procedures for the protection of exclusive use and data compensation rights of data submitters. The proposed revisions would update the regulations, which have not been revised since issuance in 1984, to accommodate statutory and procedural changes that have occurred since that time. The proposed revisions would also make minor changes to clarify the regulations. The proposed revisions would simplify the procedures and reduce burdens for certain data submitters. The proposal does not otherwise make substantive changes to the requirements.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 152(e) (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 7 USC 136(a) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 11/05/2010 75 FR 68297

Extension of Comment Period 01/04/2011 76 FR 302

Final Action 06/00/2012

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM -http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=0900006480b814b7; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQOPP-2009-0456

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/registrationkit/

Sectors Affected: 32532 Agency Contact: Cameo Smoot Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances7506P Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703 305-5454
FAX: 703 305-5884
E-Mail: smoot.cameo@epa.gov Agency Contact: Mark Dyner Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

2333 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-1754
E-Mail: dyner.mark@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ71

View Related Documents

Title: Mercury; Significant New Use Rule; Elemental Mercury Used in Barometers, Manometers, and Hygrometers/Psychrometers

Abstract: Under section 5(a)(2) of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), EPA intends to promulgate a Significant New Use Rule (SNUR) to require persons to notify EPA at least 90 days before commencing the manufacture, import, or processing of elemental mercury for use in three types of measuring devices, namely barometers, manometers, and hygrometers/psychrometers. Elemental mercury is converted to methyl mercury in the environment and is a potent neurotoxin. Mercury is no longer used in these products (except one battery-powered, motor-aspirated psychrometer which is currently manufactured and not covered by the rule). Elemental mercury in products can be released to the environment during manufacturing, use, recycling, and/or disposal. EPA considers a resumption of manufacture, import, or processing of any of the covered devices to be a significant new use.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 721 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 15 USC 2604, 2607, and 2625(c) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 05/06/2011 76 FR 26225

Final Action 05/00/2012

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM - http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=EPA-HQ-OPPT2010-0630-0001; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OPPT-2010-0630

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/oppt/existingchemicals

Sectors Affected: 334513 Agency Contact: Sue Slotnick Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7404T Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-1973
E-Mail: slotnick.sue@epa.gov Agency Contact: Lynn Vendinello Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7404T Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-0514
E-Mail: vendinello.lynn@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ76View Related Documents

Title: Protections for Subjects in Human Research Involving Pesticides

Abstract: EPA proposed to amend the portions of its rules for the protection of human subjects of research applying to third parties who conduct or support research with pesticides involving intentional exposure of human subjects and to persons who submit the results of human research with pesticides to EPA. The proposed amendments would broaden the applicability of the rules to cover human testing with pesticides submitted to EPA under any regulatory statute it administers. They would also disallow participation in third-party pesticide studies by subjects who cannot consent for themselves. Finally the proposed amendments would identify specific considerations to be addressed in EPA science and ethics reviews of proposed and completed human research with pesticides, drawn from the recommendations of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS). In seeking comments on these proposed amendments, EPA does not imply that the current Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects (the "Common Rule"), which governs research with human subjects conducted or supported by EPA and many other Federal departments and agencies, is inadequate. Indeed, the amendments proposed here would make no changes to the Common Rule or EPA's codification of the Common Rule. Rather, EPA proposed these amendments to other portions of its regulation as a result of a settlement agreement, and is now seeking comment on these proposed amendments. The settlement agreement makes clear that EPA retains full discretion concerning what amendments are proposed, and what, if any, amendments are finalized. The settlement agreement also stipulates that the final rule will be signed by December 2011.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 26 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: PL 109-54, sec 201; 5 USC 301; 42 USC 300(v)-1(b); 7 USC 136 to 136(y); 21 USC 346(a) Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

NPRM Judicial Settlement Agreement Deadline for the Administrator's Signature. 01/18/2011

Other Judicial Settlement Agreement Deadline for the Administrator's Signature. 12/18/2011

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 02/02/2011 76 FR 5735

NPRM Comment Period End 04/04/2011

Final Action 12/00/2011

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM - http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=EPA-HQ-OPP2010-0785-0002; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0785

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/oppfead1/guidance/human-test.htm

Sectors Affected: 325320 Agency Contact: Kelly Sherman Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7501P Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703 305-8401
FAX: 703 308-7042
E-Mail: sherman.kelly@epa.gov Agency Contact: William Jordan Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7501P Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703 305-1049
FAX: 703 308-4776
E-Mail: Jordan.William@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ77

View Related Documents

Title: Synchronizing the Expiration Dates of EPA Pesticide Applicator Certificates With the Underlying State or Tribal Applicator
CertificateAbstract: Applicators of restricted-use pesticides (RUP) can be certified by States, Tribes, or non-EPA Federal agencies that have an EPA-approved certification plan (authorized agencies). As part of a proposed Federal Plan, pesticide applicators may be issued an EPA certificate which allows them to apply RUPs in entities not covered by an authorized agency (e.g., parts of Indian Country) by submitting an application form and providing documentation of an existing valid certification issued by an authorized agency, without further demonstration of competency. The EPA certificate is valid for 2 years for commercial applicators and 3 years for private applicators, or until the expiration date of the original certificate issued by the authorized agencies, whichever occurs first. Some authorized agencies now issue certificates that are valid for up to 5 years. Under the current regulations, the EPA certificate may expire before the underlining certificate that it was based on expires, requiring the applicator to resubmit the same information to renew the EPA certificate. Through this action, EPA proposed to synchronize the expiration dates so that the EPA certificate expires at the same time as the underlying state, tribal, or non-EPA federal certificate. This action will not involve any other substantive changes to the regulations.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 171.11(e) (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 7 USC 136(a) et seq Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 06/24/2011 76 FR 37045

NPRM Comment Period End 08/23/2011

Final Action 12/00/2011

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM - http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=EPA-HQ-OPP2011-0049-0001; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OPP-2011-0049

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; State; Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/oppfead1/safety/applicators/applicators.htm

Sectors Affected: 32532 Agency Contact: Amaris Johnson Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7506P Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703 305-9542
FAX: 703 308-7070
E-Mail: johnson.amaris@epa.gov Agency Contact: Nicole Zinn Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7506P Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703 308-7076
FAX: 703 308-7070
E-Mail: zinn.nicole@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ80

View Related Documents

Title: Pesticides; Microbial Pesticide Definitions and Applicability; Clarification and Availability of New Test Guideline

Abstract: As promulgated, EPA's regulations distinguish "isolates" and "strains" in a confusing and non-obvious manner. This has resulted in significant uncertainty within the regulated industry. EPA addressed this problem by proposing new regulatory language that clarifies the requirements applicable to new strains that are considered to be new active ingredients under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA). EPA also announced the availability of and sought comment on a new microbial pesticide test guideline that explains the deposition of a sample in a nationally recognized culture collection data requirement. EPA also proposed several other minor corrections to words and references. The proposed changes are expected to enhance the ability of industry to efficiently manage their microbial pesticide registration submissions. EPA did not receive any comments and intends to finalize these revisions and announce the final test guideline in early 2012.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: NoCFR Citation: 40 CFR 158.2100(c)(1) and (c)(2); 40 CFR 158.2120(c) table note (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 7 USC 136(a) et seq Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 04/15/2011 76 FR 21295

Final Action 03/00/2012

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM - http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=EPA-HQ-OPP2010-0670-0001; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0670

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/biopesticides/

Sectors Affected: 32519; 32532 Agency Contact: Rose Kyprianou Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7506P Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703 305-5354
FAX: 703 305-5884
E-Mail: kyprianou.rose@epa.gov Agency Contact: Cameo Smoot Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7506P Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703 305-5454
E-Mail: Smoot.Cameo@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AC21

View Related Documents

Title: Lead Fishing Sinkers; Manufacturing, Processing, and Distribution in Commerce

Abstract: In 1991, EPA issued an advance notice of proposed rulemaking in response to a citizen's petition filed by the Environmental Defense Fund (EDF), Federation of Fly Fishers, Trumpeter Swan Society, and North American Loon Fund under section 21 of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) and the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). The petition asked EPA to initiate rulemaking proceedings under section 6 of TSCA to require that the sale of lead fishing sinkers be accompanied by an appropriate label or notice warning that such products are toxic to wildlife. In 1994, EPA proposed a rule under section 6(a) of TSCA to prohibit the manufacturing, processing, and distribution in commerce in the United States, of certain smaller size fishing sinkers containing lead and zinc, and mixed with other substances, including those made of brass.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 745 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 15 USC 2605 TSCA 6 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Notice 00/00/0000

ANPRM 05/13/1991 56 FR 22096

NPRM 03/09/1994 59 FR 11122

Additional Information: SAN No. 3252

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: UndeterminedEnergy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/oppt/lead/

Sectors Affected: 451110; 339920; 423910 Agency Contact: Christina Wadlington Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7404T Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-1859
FAX: 202 566-0471
E-Mail: Wadlington.Christina@epa.gov Agency Contact: Tom Simons Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7404T Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-0517
FAX: 202 566-0473
E-Mail: Simons.Tom@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AD49

View Related Documents

Title: Plant Incorporated Protectants (PIPs); Exemption for Those Based on Viral Coat Protein Genes

Abstract: EPA is considering the addition of plant-incorporated protectants based on viral coat protein genes to its plantincorporated protectants exemptions at 40 CFR 174. Substances which plants produce for protection against pests, and the genetic material necessary to produce them, are pesticides under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), if humans intend these substances to "prevent, repel or mitigate any pest". These substances are also "pesticide chemical residues" under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA). The proposed criteria were intended to clearly identify and exempt only those residues for which a long history of safe exposure and consumption can support exemption. EPA believes there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result from aggregate exposure to such residues, including all anticipated dietary exposures and all other exposures for which there is reliable information. Therefore, EPA is concurrently considering the exemption of plant-incorporated protectants based on viral coat protein genes from the requirement of a tolerance under section 408 of the FFDCA. Due to public interest and new scientific information, additional public comment on this proposal (originally published in 1994) was requested in 2001. After considering public comment and additional review by the Science Advisory Panel, EPA issued a re-proposal in 2007.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 174 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 21 USC 346(a) et seq; 7 USC 136 et seq Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Action 00/00/0000
NPRM Original 11/23/1994 59 FR 60496
Supplemental NPRM 1 07/22/1996 61 FR 37891
Supplemental NPRM 2 05/16/1997 62 FR 27132
Supplemental NPRM 3 04/23/1999 64 FR 19958
Supplemental NPRM 4 07/19/2001 66 FR 37855
Reproposal 04/18/2007 72 FR 19589

Additional Information: EPA publication information: Reproposal - http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-PEST/2007/April/Day18/p7297.htm; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OPP-2006-0642

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/biopesticides/pips/index.htm

Sectors Affected: 611310; 111; 32532; 54171 Agency Contact: Kenneth Haymes Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances7202M Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-0306
FAX: 202 564-8502
E-Mail: Haymes.Kenneth@epa.gov Agency Contact: Tom McClintock Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7202M Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-8488
E-Mail: mcclintock.tom@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ38

View Related Documents

Title: Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs); Reassessment of Use Authorizations

Abstract: EPA's regulations governing the use of Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) in electrical equipment and other applications were first issued in the late 1970s and have not been updated since 1998. EPA has initiated rulemaking to reassess the ongoing authorized uses of PCBs to determine whether certain use authorizations should be ended or phased out because they can no longer be justified under section 6(e) of the Toxic Substances Control Act, which requires that the authorized use will not present an unreasonable risk of injury to health and the environment. As the first step in this reassessment, EPA published an Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM) on April 7, 2010 and took comment through August 20, 2010. EPA reviewed and considered all comments received on the ANPRM in planning the current rulemaking. This action will address the following specific areas: (1) the use, distribution in commerce, marking and storage for reuse of liquid PCBs in electric and non-electric equipment; (2) improvements to the existing use authorization for natural gas pipelines; and (3) definitional and other regulatory "fixes". The reassessment of use authorizations related to liquid PCBs in equipment will focus on small capacitors in fluorescent light ballasts, large capacitors, transformers and other electrical and non-electrical equipment. In addition, revised testing, characterization, and reporting requirements for PCBs in natural gas pipeline systems to provide more transparency for the Agency and the public when PCB releases occur will be considered. Consistent with Executive Order 13563, "Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review", wherever possible and consistent with the overall objectives of this rulemaking, the Agency also intends to eliminate or fix regulatory inefficiencies noted by the Agency or in public comments on
the ANPRM.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: Undetermined Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 761 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 15 USC 2605 TSCA 6(e) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

ANPRM 04/07/2010 75 FR 17645

ANPRM Extension of Comment Period 06/16/2010 75 FR 34076

NPRM 04/00/2013

Additional Information: EPA publication information: ANPRM -http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=0900006480ad1ca9; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQOPPT-2009-0757

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Local; State; Tribal

Small Entities Affected: Business; Governmental Jurisdictions; Organizations Federalism: Undetermined

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/epawaste/hazard/tsd/pcbs/index.htm

Sectors Affected: 31-33; 22 Agency Contact: John Smith Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7404T Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-0512
FAX: 202 566-0473
E-Mail: Smith.JohnH@epa.govAgency Contact: Peter Gimlin Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7404T Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-0515
FAX: 202 566-0473
E-Mail: gimlin.peter@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ45

View Related Documents

Title: Pesticides; Reconsideration of Exemptions for Insect Repellents

Abstract: EPA is developing rulemaking to modify the minimum risk pesticides exemption under 40 CFR 152.25(f) to exclude personally applied insect repellents from the exemption and require an abbreviated data set for such products. EPA is taking this action because these pesticides claim to control pests of significant public health importance.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 152.25 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 7 USC 136(a); 7 USC 136(w) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 02/00/2013

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0227

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Business Government Levels Affected: Federal; State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/

Sectors Affected: 3251; 32532 Agency Contact: Kathryn Boyle Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7506P Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703 305-6304
FAX: 703 305-5884
E-Mail: Boyle.Kathryn@epa.gov Agency Contact: Niva Kramek Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7506P Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703 605-1193
FAX: 703 305-5884
E-Mail: Kramek.Niva@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ49

View Related Documents

Title: Pesticides; Data Requirements for Product Performance

Abstract: EPA will propose to amend efficacy data requirements that specifically address the registration data needs of invertebrate pesticide product registrations as mandated by Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA). This rulemaking will provide clarity, consistency, and transparency. This proposal will seek to amend the current efficacy data requirements codified in 40 CFR 158, which describes the minimum data and information EPA typically requires to support an application for pesticide registration or amendment, and the maintenance of a pesticide registration, e.g., as in the registration review program.Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 152; 40 CFR 156; 40 CFR 158 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 7 USC 136 to 136(y) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 02/00/2013

Additional Information: SAN No. 5331

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; State

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.epa.gov/pesticides

Sectors Affected: 32532 Agency Contact: Candace Brassard Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7506P Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703 305-6598
FAX: 703 305-5884
E-Mail: brassard.candace@epa.gov Agency Contact: Amaris Johnson Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7506P Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703 305-9542
FAX: 703 308-7070
E-Mail: johnson.amaris@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ52

View Related Documents

Title: Significant New Use Rule for Glymes

Abstract: EPA issued a proposed significant new use rule (SNUR) under section 5(a)(2) of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) for 14 glymes on 7/12/2011. Once finalized, this action would require persons who intend to manufacture, import, or process these chemical substances for the designated significant new uses to notify EPA at least 90 days before commencing such manufacture, import, or processing. The required notification would provide EPA with the opportunity to evaluate the intended use and, if necessary, to prohibit or limit that activity before it occurs.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: Undetermined Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 721 (revision) (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 15 USC 2601 et seq Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 07/12/2011 76 FR 40860

Final Action 02/00/2013

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM - http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=EPA-HQ-OPPT2009-0767-0001; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OPPT-2009-0767

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/oppt/existingchemicals/Sectors Affected: 325; 324110 Agency Contact: Amy Breedlove Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7405M Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-9823
FAX: 202 564-4775
E-Mail: breedlove.amy@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ62

View Related Documents

Title: Pesticides; Public Availability of Identities of Inert Ingredients in Pesticides

Abstract: In response to two petitions under the Administrative Procedures Act seeking disclosure of selected inert ingredients on pesticide labels (based on the hazard of that ingredient), EPA is contemplating rulemaking to increase public availability of both potentially hazardous inert ingredients and of inert ingredient identities in general. This action would assist consumers and users of pesticides in making informed decisions and reduce the presence of potentially hazardous ingredients in pesticides. EPA is considering various approaches, including disclosure based on hazard and broader disclosure of inert ingredient
identities.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 7 USC 136 et seq Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 00/00/0000

ANPRM 12/23/2009 74 FR 68215

ANPRM Extension of Comment Period 02/22/2010 75 FR 7560

Additional Information: EPA publication information: ANPRM - http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=EPA-HQ-OPP2009-0635-0001; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OPP-2009-0635

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/

Sectors Affected: 325; 32531; 32519; 32551; 32532; 32561 Agency Contact: Kerry Leifer Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7505P Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703 308-8811
FAX: 703 305-6920
E-Mail: leifer.kerry@epa.gov Agency Contact: Martha Shimkin Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7506P Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703 305-5160
E-Mail: shimkin.martha@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ69

View Related Documents

Title: Short-Chained Chlorinated Paraffins (SCCPs); Regulation(s) Under TSCA

Abstract: EPA is initiating action under section 6 of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) to consider proposing to ban orrestrict the manufacture, import, processing or distribution in commerce, export, and use of Short Chained Chlorinated Paraffins (SCCPs). EPA is concerned with SCCPs because they are persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic to aquatic organisms at low concentrations. They can remain in the environment for a significant amount of time and can bioaccumulate in animal tissues, increasing the probability and duration of exposure. Even relatively small releases of these chemicals from individual facilities that manufacture import, process or use these chemicals or releases from waste management facilities have the potential to accumulate over time to higher levels and cause significant adverse impacts on the environment.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 15 USC 2601 et seq Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Action 00/00/0000

NPRM 08/00/2013

Additional Information: SAN No. 5429

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: Undetermined Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/oppts/

Sectors Affected: 325 Agency Contact: Marc Edmonds Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7404T Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-0758
E-Mail: Edmonds.Marc@epa.gov Agency Contact: Michelle Price Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7404T Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-0744

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ72

View Related Documents

Title: Long-Chain Perfluorinated Chemicals (LCPFCs); Regulation(s) Under TSCA

Abstract: Section 6 of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) provides authority for EPA to ban or restrict the manufacture (including import), processing, distribution in commerce, and use of these chemicals, as well as any manner or method of disposal of these chemicals. EPA is considering initiating TSCA section 6 rulemaking for managing long-chain perfluorinated chemicals (LCPFCs). LCPFCs includes two sub-categories: perfluoroalkyl sulfonates (PFAS) and perfluoroalkyl carboxylates (PFAC). The PFAS sub-category includes perfluorohexane sulfonic acid (PFHxS), perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS), other higher homologues, and their salts and precursors. The PFAC sub-category includes perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA, sometimes called C8), other higher homologues, and their salts and precursors. Some of those potential PFAC precursors include chemicals known commercially as fluorotelomers. PFOA is a synthetic (man-made) chemical that does not occur naturally in the environment. Companies use PFOA to make fluoropolymers, substances with special properties that have thousands of important manufacturing and industrial applications. Fluoropolymers impart valuable properties, including fire resistance and oil, stain, grease, and water repellency. They are used to provide non-stick surfaces on cookware and waterproof, breathable membranes for clothing, and are used in many industry segments, including the aerospace, automotive, building/construction, chemical processing, electronics, semiconductors, and textile industries. PFOA can also be produced by the breakdown of some fluorinated telomers, substances that are used in surface treatment products to impart soil, stain, grease, and water resistance. Some telomers are also used as high performance surfactants in products that must flow evenly, such as paints, coatings, and cleaning products, fire-fighting foams for use on liquid fuel fires, or the engineering coatings used in semiconductor manufacture. LCPFCs are found world-wide in the environment, wildlife, and humans. They are bioaccumulative in wildlife and humans, and are persistent in the environment. To date, significant adverse effects have not been found in the general human population; however, significant adverse effects have been identified in laboratory animals and wildlife. Given the long half-life of these chemicals in humans (years), it can reasonably be anticipated that continued exposure could increase body burdens to levels

that would result in adverse outcomes.Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 15 USC 2601 et seq Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 01/00/2013

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/oppt/existingchemicals/pubs/actionplans/pfcs.html

Sectors Affected: 325 Agency Contact: Toni Krasnic Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7405M Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-0984
E-Mail: Krasnic.Toni@epa.gov Agency Contact: Katherine Sleasman Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7405M Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-7716
FAX: 202 564-4775
E-Mail: sleasman.katherine@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ82

View Related Documents

Title: Lead Dust Hazard Standards

Abstract: U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is reviewing existing regulatory dust lead hazard standards for residential buildings and Child Occupied Facilities (COFs). On January 5, 2001, the EPA issued a final regulation under sections 403 and 402(c)(3) of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). The 2001 final rule established regulatory dust lead hazard standards of 40 μg/ft2 for floors and 250 μg/ft2 for interior window sills. The rule also established clearance levels for dust following an abatement of 40 μg/ft2 for floors, 250 μg/ft2 for interior window sills and 400 μg/ft2 in window troughs. On August 10, 2009, EPA received a petition requesting that EPA take action to lower EPA’s regulatory lead hazard standards for lead in dust. On October 22, 2009, EPA granted the request. Additionally, since the 2001 final rule, EPA has assessed new data regarding lead and lead dust. Because new data has become available and a new NAAQS review is being held, the Agency’s review of the existing lead dust hazard and clearance levels for target housing and COFs should reflect this new information in order to maintain consistency within the Agency. Currently, there are no lead based paint hazard standards for the interiors of public and commercial buildings. EPA will consider the development of a hazard standard for public and commercial buildings in a separate rulemaking.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 745 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 15 USC 2681 TSCA 403 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Action 00/00/0000

NPRM 03/00/2013

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA–HQ–OPPT–2009–0665

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; State; Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: NoEnergy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/lead/pubs/leadhaz.htm

Sectors Affected: 541350; 624410; 236; 611110; 541330; 611519; 531; 238 Agency Contact: Christina Wadlington Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7404T Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-1859
FAX: 202 566-0469
E-Mail: wadlington.christina@epa.gov Agency Contact: Marc Edmonds Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7404T Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-0758
E-Mail: edmonds.marc@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ83

View Related Documents

Title: Testing of Bisphenol A (BPA)

Abstract: Bisphenol A (BPA), a high production volume chemical, is a reproductive, developmental, and systemic toxicant in animal studies and is weakly estrogenic. Following consideration of public comments received on an advance notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPRM) published July 26, 2011, EPA will determine whether to publish a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) identifying specific protocols for toxicity testing to determine the potential for BPA to cause endocrine-related adverse effects in environmental organisms at low concentrations, and/or identifying specific protocols for environmental sampling and monitoring to determine whether potentially sensitive organisms may currently be exposed to concentrations of BPA in the environment that are at or above levels of concern for adverse effects, including endocrine-related effects.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 799 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 15 USC 2603 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

ANPRM 07/26/2011 76 FR 44535

NPRM 06/00/2013

Additional Information: EPA publication information: ANPRM - http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=EPA-HQOPPT-2010-0812-0001; EPA Docket information: EPA–HQ–OPPT–2010–0812

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/oppt/existingchemicals/pubs/actionplans/bpa.html

Sectors Affected: 325; 32411 Agency Contact: Mary Dominiak Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7405M Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-8104
E-Mail: Dominiak.Mary@epa.gov Agency Contact: Rebecca Edelstein Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7406M Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-8566
E-Mail: Edelstein.Rebecca@epa.govEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ90

View Related Documents

Title: CBI; Reassertion and Resubstantiation of Confidentiality Claims Submitted Under TSCA

Abstract: EPA is considering establishing regulations relating to claims for confidential business information (CBI) submitted under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) that would require the periodic reassertion and resubstantiation of such claims. Confidentiality claims which are not reasserted and resubstantiated would expire. EPA expects this action would increase transparency and availability of public health and environmental effects information on chemicals in commerce.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 2.306 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 15 USC 2613 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 12/00/2012

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Federal

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=EPA-HQOPPT-2010-0446-0001

Sectors Affected: 325 Agency Contact: Aakruti Shah Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7408M Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-8183
E-Mail: Shah.Aakruti@epa.gov Agency Contact: Ryan Wallace Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7408M Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-8824
E-Mail: Wallace.Ryan@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AB08

View Related Documents

Title: TSCA Section 8(a) Preliminary Assessment Information Rules

Abstract: These rules add chemicals to the list of chemicals and designated mixtures subject to the requirements of the Toxic Substances Control Act section 8(a) Preliminary Assessment Information Rule (40 CFR part 712). These chemicals have been identified by the Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, other EPA offices, and other Federal agencies, as well as recommended for testing consideration by the Interagency Testing Committee. Manufacturers and importers are required to submit exposure-related data (EPA Form No. 7710-35) on the chemicals. The data will be used to monitor the levels of production, import and/or processing of the identified substances and the avenues of human and environmental exposure to these substances. This Regulatory Agenda entry was created a few decades ago to help identify the most recent rules that were issued. Since the most recent rule issued was in 2006, EPA is removing this entry from the Regulatory Agenda at this time. Future inclusion in the Regulatory Agenda will be considered as appropriate.

Priority: Routine and Frequent Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 712 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 15 USC 2607(a) TSCA 8(a) Legal Deadline: NoneTimetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Rule for 55th, 56th and 58th ITC Lists 08/16/2006 71 FR 47122

Withdrawn 11/16/2011

Additional Information: EPA publication information: Final Rule for 55th, 56th and 58th ITC Lists - http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-TOX/2006/August/Day-16/t13489.htm

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/oppt/chemtest

Sectors Affected: 325; 32411 Agency Contact: Mike Mattheisen Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7405M Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-3077
E-Mail: mattheisen.mike@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AB11

View Related Documents

Title: TSCA Section 8(d) Health and Safety Data Reporting Rules

Abstract: These rules require chemical manufacturers, importers, and processors to submit unpublished health and safety data on chemicals added to the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) section 8(d) Health and Safety Data Reporting Rule (40 CFR part 716). These chemicals have been identified by the Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics (OPPT), other EPA offices, and other Federal agencies, as well as recommended for testing consideration by the Interagency Testing Committee (ITC). This Regulatory Agenda entry served as a placeholder for future rules, and, when applicable, identifies the most recent rules and any anticipated rules. Since it is not necessary to maintain such a placeholder, EPA is removing this entry from the Regulatory Agenda at this time. Future inclusion in the Regulatory Agenda will be considered as necessary and appropriate.

Priority: Routine and Frequent Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 716 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 15 USC 2607(d) TSCA 8(d) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Rule for 60th ITC List 01/29/2008 73 FR 5109

Withdrawn 11/16/2011

Additional Information: EPA publication information: Final Rule for 60th ITC List - http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPATOX/2008/January/Day-29/t1546.pdf

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.epa.gov/oppt/chemtest

Sectors Affected: 325; 32411 Agency Contact: Mike Mattheisen Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7405M Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-3077
E-Mail: mattheisen.mike@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AB94

View Related Documents

Title: Testing of Existing Chemicals (Overview Entry for Future Needs)

Abstract: Section 4 of Toxic Substances and Control Act (TSCA) gives EPA the authority to require chemical manufacturers and processors to test existing chemicals. Under section 4, EPA can by rule require testing after finding that (1) a chemical may present an unreasonable risk of injury to human health or the environment, and/or the chemical is produced and enters the environment in substantial quantities or there is or may be significant or substantial human exposure to the chemical, (2) the available data to evaluate the chemical are inadequate, and (3) testing is needed to develop the needed data. The Chemical Testing Program in EPA's Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics (OPPT) also works with members of the U.S. chemical industry to develop data via TSCA section 4 Enforceable Consent Agreements (ECAs). ECAs are usually less resource intensive than formal TSCA rule-making. In developing ECAs, EPA may consider agreed-upon pollution prevention and other types of product stewardship initiatives by the chemical industry as a possible substitute for or adjunct to certain types of testing. The Agency may also consider test rules or ECAs for chemicals or categories of chemicals which have been identified for testing consideration by other Federal or other EPA offices through EPA review processes. This action is being withdrawn from the Regulatory Agenda because it is merely a placeholder entry that covers potential test rules that may be initiated in between Regulatory Agenda updates. In the past, it has been used as a generic entry to alert the public that within the next 6 months the Agency may consider other chemicals for test rules, or ECAs that have not yet been identified. It does not itself represent any actual action under development. A separate, activity-specific entry will be included in the Regulatory Agenda once the Agency decides to develop a test rule or ECA.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 790 to 799 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 15 USC 2603 TSCA 4; 15 USC 2611 TSCA 12 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Withdrawn 08/23/2011

Additional Information: SAN No. 3493

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/oppt/chemtest

Sectors Affected: 325; 32411 Agency Contact: Karen Chu Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7405M Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-8773
FAX: 202 564-4765
E-Mail: chu.karen@epa.gov Agency Contact: Mike Mattheisen Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7405M Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-3077
E-Mail: mattheisen.mike@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AC51

View Related Documents

Title: Asbestos Model Accreditation Plan Revisions

Abstract: The Asbestos School Hazard Abatement Reauthorization Act (ASHARA) amended the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) to require that EPA revise its asbestos model accreditation plan (MAP) to extend training and accreditation requirements to include persons performing certain asbestos-related work in public or commercial buildings, to increase the minimum number of training hours required for accreditation purposes and to effect other changes necessary to implement the amendments. On February 3, 1994, EPA issued an interim final rule to revise the asbestos MAP to clarify the types of persons who must be accredited to work with asbestos in schools and public or commercial buildings; to increase the minimum numberof hours of training for asbestos abatement workers and contractor/supervisors, including additional hours of hands-on health and safety training; and to effect a variety of other necessary changes as mandated by section 15(a)(3) of the ASHARA. This interim final rule satisfied the statutory deadline. EPA is therefore marking this action as complete for purposes of the Regulatory Agenda. EPA will continue to consider finalizing the MAP rule and/ or promulgating regulatory revisions to sunset current EPA MAP accreditations granted to training providers. Should EPA decide to initiate such rulemakings, a new entry will be created in the Regulatory Agenda.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 763 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 15 USC 2646 TSCA 206 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Model Plan 05/13/1992 57 FR 20438

Interim Final Action 02/03/1994 59 FR 5236

Withdrawn 11/16/2011

Additional Information: EPA publication information: Model Plan - http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page? public=false&handle=hein.fedreg/057093&men_hide=false&men_tab=citnav&collection=fedreg&page=20438

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State; Tribal

Small Entities Affected: Business; Governmental Jurisdictions Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/asbestos/

Sectors Affected: 92312; 611519 Agency Contact: Robert Courtnage Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7404T Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-1081
E-Mail: courtnage.robert@epa.gov Agency Contact: Shiela Canavan Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7404T Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-1980
E-Mail: canavan.shiela@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ23

View Related Documents

Title: Pesticides; Tolerance Processing Fees

Abstract: Section 408(m) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) was amended to require EPA to charge tolerance fees that, in the aggregate, will cover all costs associated with processing tolerance actions, including filing a tolerance petition, and establishing, modifying, leaving in effect, or revoking a tolerance or tolerance exemption. EPA developed a final rule that would have adjusted the fee structure and fee amounts for tolerance actions. A final rule completed OMB review on December 31, 2003, but has not been issued because the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2004, signed on January 23, 2004, prohibited EPA from collecting any tolerances fees until September 30, 2008. This prohibition was expanded in 2005 to include a prohibition on using federal funding to perform any work on a final tolerance fee rulemaking. As such, no rulemaking activities are currently planned. Most recently, the prohibition was extended yet again in 2007 when Congress adopted the Pesticide Registration Improvement Renewal Act. In that bill, Congress extended the ban on assessing tolerance fees through September 30, 2012. EPA is withdrawing this action from the Regulatory Agenda. Future inclusion in the Regulatory Agenda will be considered as appropriate.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 180; 40 CFR 178 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 21 USC 346(a) Legal Deadline: NoneTimetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 06/09/1999 64 FR 31039
Supplemental NPRM 07/24/2000 65 FR 45569
Supplemental NPRM 2 08/31/2000 65 FR 52979

Withdrawn 12/08/2011

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM - http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-PEST/1999/June/Day09/p14477.htm; http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/fees/; EPA Docket information: Legacy Docket # OPP-30115

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/regulating/fees/index.htm

Sectors Affected: 32532 Agency Contact: Martha Shimkin Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7506P Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703 305-5160
E-Mail: Shimkin.martha@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ39

View Related Documents

Title: Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs); Placeholder for Petitions Seeking a Manufacturing (Import) Exemption for Use

Abstract: Section 6(e)(3)(B) of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) provides that the Administrator may grant, by rule, exemptions from the prohibitions against manufacturing, processing and distribution in commerce of poly chlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) upon finding that 1) no unreasonable risk to health or the environment will occur, and 2) good faith efforts have been made by the petitioner to develop a substitute for PCB which does not pose an unreasonable risk of injury to health or the environment. These petitions are managed by the Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics. Petitions that request an exemption to dispose of PCBs are managed by the Office of Solid Waste. This action is being withdrawn from the Regulatory Agenda because it is a routine action that is not signed by the Administrator. Currently, no petitions are pending. EPA is only withdrawing the entry from being reported via the Regulatory Agenda; petition-related publications will continue to be found on EPA's PCB website at http://www.epa.gov/pcb.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 761 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 15 USC 2605 TSCA 6(e)(3)(B) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Withdrawn 08/23/2011

Additional Information: SAN No. 2150

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.epa.gov/pcb

Sectors Affected: 56292; 5622

Related RINs: Previously Reported as 2070-AB20 Agency Contact: Peter Gimlin Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7404T Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-0515
FAX: 202 566-0473
E-Mail: gimlin.peter@epa.govAgency Contact: Lynn Vendinello Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7404T Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-0514
E-Mail: vendinello.lynn@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ43

View Related Documents

Title: TSCA Inventory Update Reporting Modifications

Abstract: On August 16, 2011, EPA promulgated a final rule that amended the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) section 8(a) Inventory Update Reporting (IUR) rule and changed its name to the Chemical Data Reporting (CDR) rule. The purpose of this rule is to collect quality screening-level, exposure-related information on chemical substances and to make that information available for use by EPA and, to the extent possible, to the public. The IUR/CDR data are used to support risk screening, assessment, priority setting and management activities and constitute the most comprehensive source of basic screening-level, exposure-related information on chemicals available to EPA. EPA uses the data to support many health, safety, and environmental protection activities. Processing and use information reported in 2012 will help EPA, other agencies, and the general public to readily screen and prioritize chemicals for the purpose of identifying potential human health and environmental effects. Returning the reporting period from every 5 years to every 4 years will assure that the public has timely access to current and improved data. This information will also provide the American people with greater access to a wide range of information on those chemicals to which their children and families are exposed every day. The requirement for improved data will enhance the Agency’s ability to more effectively identify and address potential chemical risks. The next CDR submission period for reporting for the 2012 CDR is February 1, 2012, to June 30, 2012. The CDR regulation requires all companies to report data electronically using a web-based reporting tool and EPA’s Central Data Exchange. Manufacturers (including importers) are required to report full manufacturing data for calendar year 2011 and production volume only for calendar year 2010 for all reportable chemical substances when 2011 site-specific production volume equals or exceeds 25,000 lb. Manufacturers, (including importers) are required to report processing and use data for calendar year 2011, for all reportable chemical substances when 2011 site-specific production volume equals or exceeds 100,000 lbs.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 710 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 15 USC 2607 (TSCA sec 8) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 08/13/2010 75 FR 49656
Final Action; Submission Period Suspension 05/11/2011 76 FR 27271

Final Action 08/16/2011 76 FR 50816

Additional Information: Final Rule: http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=EPA-HQ-OPPT-2009-0187-0393

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/iur/

Sectors Affected: 325; 324 Agency Contact: Chenise Farquharson Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7405M Washington , DC 204060
Phone: 202 564-7768
FAX: 202 564-4775
E-Mail: Farquharson.Chenise@epa.gov Agency Contact: Susan Sharkey Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7405M Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-8789
FAX: 202 564-4775
E-Mail: Sharkey.Susan@epa.govEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ50

View Related Documents

Title: Electronic Reporting of Chemical Import Data in the Automated Commercial Environment (ACE)

Abstract: EPA will make recommendations to and consult with Customs and Border Protection (CBP), in the Department of Homeland Security, to propose regulatory revisions necessary for the implementation of electronic reporting of chemical and pesticides import information in the Automated Commercial Environment (ACE). Congress has mandated participation in the International Trade Data System (ITDS) through passage of the SAFE Port Act in October 2006. The ITDS Program is a government-wide organizational framework managed by CBP to assist every Federal agency that has import/export responsibilities to integrate their requirements into ACE. Participation in the ITDS Program has also been recommended by the Import Safety Working Group (ISWG), established under Executive Order 13439 (July 18, 2007). ACE is a data warehouse being designed by CBP that will serve as a single portal for the electronic collection and processing of all data required by any federal agency pertaining to the importation of commodities into, and their exportation from, the U.S. After consultation with EPA regarding its recommendations, CBP will need to amend its regulations in Title 19 of the Code of Federal Regulations pertaining to importation of chemical substances subject to the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) and pesticides under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) to require electronic reporting by importers into ACE. Regulations regarding imports under TSCA and FIFRA are promulgated by CBP, in consultation with EPA. Other amendments to the regulations (e.g., verification data for TSCA certification statements) may also be considered by CBP. EPA is withdrawing this action from the Regulatory Agenda. Future inclusion in the Regulatory Agenda will be considered as appropriate.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 19 CFR 12.118 to 12.127; 40 CFR 707 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 15 USC 2612; 7 USC 136(o) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Withdrawn 12/08/2011

Additional Information: SAN No. 5305

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No Energy Affected: No International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise be of
international interest.

RIN Information URL: www.itds.gov Agency Contact: David Giamporcaro Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7408M Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-8107
E-Mail: Giamporcaro.David@epa.gov Agency Contact: Kate Bouve Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7502P Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703 305-5032
E-Mail: bouve.kate@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ57

View Related Documents

Title: Lead; Clearance and Clearance Testing Requirements for the Renovation, Repair, and Painting Program

Abstract: On May 6, 2010, EPA proposed a number of revisions to the 2008 Lead Renovation, Repair, and Painting Program (RRP) rule that established accreditation, training, certification, and recordkeeping requirements as well as work practice standards for persons performing renovations for compensation in most pre-1978 housing and child-occupied facilities. For thefinal rule that was promulgated on August 5, 2011, EPA decided not to promulgate dust wipe testing and clearance requirements as proposed. However, EPA promulgated several other revisions to the RRP rule, including a provision allowing a certified renovator to collect a paint chip sample and send it to a recognized laboratory for analysis in lieu of using a lead test kit, minor changes to the training program accreditation application process, standards for e-learning in accredited training programs, minimum enforcement provisions for authorized state and tribal renovation programs, and minor revisions to the training and certification requirements for renovators. EPA also promulgated clarifications to the requirements for verticalcontainment on exterior renovation projects, the prohibited or restricted work practice provisions, and the requirements for highefficiency particulate air (HEPA) vacuums.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: Private Sector

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 745 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 15 USC 2601(c); 15 USC 2682(c)(3); 15 USC 2684; 15 USC 2686; 15 USC 2687 Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

NPRM Judicial Signature 04/22/2010

Other Judicial Signature 07/15/2011

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 05/06/2010 75 FR 25038

NPRM Extension of Comment Period 07/07/2010 75 FR 38959

Final Action 08/05/2011 76 FR 47918

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM -http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=0900006480ae7efa; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQOPPT-2005-0049

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Business Government Levels Affected: Federal; State; Local; Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/lead/pubs/renovation.htm

Sectors Affected: 236; 238; 531; 624410; 611110; 611519; 541330; 541350 Agency Contact: Cindy Wheeler Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7404T Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-0484
E-Mail: Wheeler.Cindy@epa.gov Agency Contact: Michelle Price Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7404T Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-0744

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ84

View Related Documents

Title: Exemption for Plant Virus Derived Plant-Incorporated Protectants (PVCP-PIPs) In Hawaiian Papaya Line 55-1 and Squash Lines CZW-3 and ZW-20

Abstract: EPA is developing a proposal for a specific exemption from regulation under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) for two squash lines (CZW-3 and ZW-20) and for the Hawaiian papaya line 55-1. There is a long history of humans using foods containing plant-incorporated protectants. Virus infected plants have always been a part of the natural environment, and organisms that interact with plants have likely been exposed to plant virus coat proteins over long periods of time. EPA considered developing this proposed exemption because the Agency, which has completed a review of the data, believes that the PVCP-PIPs covered by this exemption (Squash line CZW-3, Squash line ZW-20 and Hawaiian papaya line 55-1) meet the criteria in 40 CFR 174.21 and can be exempt from the requirements of FIFRA. EPA is withdrawing this action from the Regulatory Agenda because no action is currently planned or underway. Should EPA determine to consider such an exemption later, future inclusion in the Regulatory Agenda will be considered as appropriate.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed ActionMajor: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 174 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 7 USC 136 et seq Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Withdrawn 12/08/2011

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/biopesticides/

Sectors Affected: 611310; 111; 32532; 54171 Agency Contact: Kenneth Haymes Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7202M Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-0306
FAX: 202 564-8502
E-Mail: Haymes.Kenneth@epa.gov Agency Contact: Elizabeth Milewski Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7202M Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-8492
FAX: 202 564-8501
E-Mail: Milewski.Elizabeth@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ86

View Related Documents

Title: High Production Volume (HPV) Chemicals; 3rd Group of Chemicals

Abstract: High production volume (HPV) chemicals are manufactured (including imported) in the aggregate at more than 1 million pounds on an annual basis. Under section 4(a)(1)(B) of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), EPA is establishing testing and recordkeeping requirements for 29 chemicals identified in the 2010 proposed rule. This test rule is one in a series of rules, addressing what EPA refers to as the third group of chemicals identified under the HPV Program. The testing may vary based on the specific data needs identified for the particular chemical to which it applies, but the data generally collected under this rule includes: acute toxicity, repeat dose toxicity, developmental and reproductive toxicity, mutagenicity, ecotoxicity, and environmental fate. Data developed under this rule will provide critical information about the environmental fate and potential hazards associated with these chemicals which, when combined with information about exposure and uses, will allow the Agency and others to evaluate potential health and environmental risks and to take appropriate follow-up action.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 790 to 799 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 15 USC 2601 et seq Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 02/25/2010 75 FR 8575
Notice - Public Meeting 08/23/2010 75 FR 51734

Final Action 10/21/2011 76 FR 65385

Final Action Effective 11/21/2011

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM - http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=0900006480aae47c; Split from RIN 2070-AD16; EPA
Docket information: EPA-HQ-OPPT-2009-0112

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: NoSmall Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No Energy Affected: No International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise be of
international interest.

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/opptintr/chemtest

Sectors Affected: 325; 32411 Agency Contact: Paul Campanella Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7405M Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-8091
E-Mail: Campanella.Paul@epa.gov Agency Contact: John Schaeffer Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
7405M Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-8173
FAX: 202 564-4765
E-Mail: Schaeffer.John@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of the Administrator ( AdmO ) RIN: 2090-AA39

View Related Documents

Title: Part 7--Nondiscrimination in Programs or Activities Receiving Federal Assistance From the Environmental Protection Agency

Abstract: EPA's nondiscrimination regulations prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and sex (gender) in the program and activities that received Federal Financial Assistance. Promulgating this amendment will bring EPA in line with US Department of Justice and other Federal Agencies to ensure that all complaints are promptly investigated.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: Not Yet Determined Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 01/00/2012

Final Action 06/00/2012

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No Agency Contact: Helena Wooden-Aguilar Environmental Protection Agency
Office of the Administrator
1201A Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-0792
E-Mail: Wooden-Aguilar.Helena@epamail.epa.gov