alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EUR-Lex - 12002E135 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 12002E135

**Treaty establishing the European Community (Nice consolidated version) - Part Three: Community policies - Title X: Customs cooperation - Article 135 - Article 116 - EEC Treaty **

*
Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0092 - 0092 Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0238 - Consolidated version *

Treaty establishing the European Community (Nice consolidated version)

Part Three: Community policies

Title X: Customs cooperation

Article 135

Article 116 - EEC Treaty

Article 135

Within the scope of application of this Treaty, the Council, acting in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 251, shall take measures in order to strengthen customs cooperation between Member States and between the latter and the Commission. These measures shall not concern the application of national criminal law or the national administration of justice.
## u.s.Departmentof 

### Transportation OfficeoftheSecretary ofTransportation .'-_:'"L'! " ,l 

## -(1 C) 

## I: 53

MEMORANDUM TO DOCKET 2009-0155 1200 NewJersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590

On September 20,2010, the DeputyAssistant Secretary forAviation and International Affairs (DAS), Christa Fornarotto, chaired a meeting with five representatives of Delta Airlines. The meeting concerned the ongoing Delta-Virgin Blue Antitrust Immunity (ATI) case. DAS Fornarotto
was accompanied by stafffrom heroffice and from the General Counsel's office. She opened the meeting by outlining the Department's show-cause order in this proceeding (Order 2010-9- 4), including concerns that had been raised in the order relating to the applicants' plans and abilityto integrate their operations; the geographic scope oftheir planned coordination; the scope of public benefits from ATI that otherwise would not be possible; and the state ofthe U.S.-Australia market. She then invited questions. Department staffalso noted that anything Delta wanted to have the Department consider in the proceeding needed to be contained in a filing on the record.

Delta argued that approval ofits application would be consistent with the Department's ATI policy. Delta's representatives made a numberofother legal and factual points regarding the show-cause order, but devoted most oftheirtime to discussing issues that had been raised in the order, as well as various additional clarifications and evidentiary points thatthe carrier contemplated making on the record.
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 185 (Monday, September 25, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 55810]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-8144]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request for Review of a 
Revised Information Collection: RI 25-15

AGENCY: Office of Personnel Management.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. 
L. 104-13, May 22, 1995 and 5 CFR 1320), this notice announces that the 
Office of Personnel Management (OPM) has submitted to the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) a request for review of a revised 
information collection. RI 25-15, Notice of Change in Student's Status, 
is used to collect sufficient information from adult children of 
deceased Federal employees or annuitants to assure that the child 
continues to be eligible for payments from OPM.
    Approximately 2,500 certifications are processed annually. Each 
form takes approximately 20 minutes to complete. The annual estimated 
burden is 835 hours.
    For copies of this proposal, contact Mary Beth Smith-Toomey on 
(202) 606-8358, FAX (202) 418-3251 or E-mail to MaryBeth <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e0b38d899488cdb48f8f8d8599a08f908dce878f96"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0e5d63677a66235a6161636b774e617e6320696178">[email protected]</span></a>. Please include your mailing address with your request.

DATES: Comments on this proposal should be received within 30 calendar 
days from the date of this publication.

ADDRESSES: Send or deliver comments to--
Pamela S. Israel, Chief, Operations Support Group, Center for 
Retirement and Insurance Services, U.S. Office of Personnel Management, 
1900 E Street, NW., Room 3349, Washington, DC 20415-3540, and
Brenda Aguilar, OPM Desk Officer, Office of Information & Regulatory 
Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, New Executive Office 
Building, NW., Room 10235, Washington, DC 20503.

For Information Regarding Administrative Coordination Contact:

Cyrus S. Benson, Team Leader, Publications Team, RIS Support Services/
Support Group, (202) 606-0623.

    U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
Dan G. Blair,
Deputy Director.
[FR Doc. 06-8144 Filed 9-22-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325-38-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# EUR-Lex - 12004V056 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V056

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART I - TITLE VII — THE UNION'S FINANCES - Article I-56 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0038 - 0038 *

Article I-56

The Union's budget

A European law shall establish the Union's annual budget in accordance with Article III-404.

--------------------------------------------------
ANTI-HEROIN TASK FORCE (AHTF) PROGRAM

2020 AWARDS

State Law Enforcement Agency Award Amount 

FL Florida Department of Law Enforcement $2,208,052.00

GA Georgia Bureau of Investigation $2,474,918.00 

IN Indiana State Police $1,285,080.00 

KY Kentucky State Police $1,455,320.00

LA Louisiana State Police $2,998,794.00

MA Massachusetts State Police $3,988,775.00

MD Maryland State Police $1,175,715.00

ME Maine Drug Enforcement Agency at 

Augusta

$931,880.00

NC North Carolina Department of Public 

Safety

$1,062,770.00

NJ New Jersey Department of Law and Public 

Safety

$3,853,157.00

OH Ohio Organized Crime Investigations 

Commission

$3,658,998.00

PA Pennsylvania State Police $1,504,576.00

TN Tennessee Bureau of Investigation $2,133,216.00

TX Texas Department of Public Safety $1,000,000.00

TOTAL NUMBER OF AWARDS: 14

TOTAL AMOUNT OF 2020 AHTF AWARDS: $29,731,251.00
exv10w3



 




Exhibit 10.3




Schedule of Director Compensation




Compensation of Directors. Each director of the Corporation is also a director of First
Financial Bank (“FFB”), the lead subsidiary bank of the Corporation, and receives directors’ fees
from each organization. For 2007 a director of the Corporation and FFB will receive a fee of $750
for each board meeting attended.



Non-employee directors also receive a fee for meetings attended of the Audit Committee of
$1,000, the Compensation Committee of $1,000, the Governance/Nominating Committee of $500, and the
Loan Discount Committee of $300. Each director also will receive from FFB a semi-annual director’s
fee of $2,500 on July l7th and December 18th. No non-employee director served as a director of any
other subsidiary of the Corporation.



Directors of the Corporation and FFB who are not yet 70 years of age may participate in a
deferred director’s fee program at each institution. Under this program, a director may defer
$6,000 of his or her director’s fees each year over a five-year period. When the director reaches
the age of 65 or age 70, the director may elect to receive payments over a ten-year period. The
amount of the deferred fees is used to purchase an insurance product which funds these payments.
Each year from the initial date of deferral until payments begin at age 65 or 70, the Corporation
accrues a non-cash expense which will equal in the aggregate the amount of the payments to be made
to the director over the ten-year period. The Corporation expects that the cash surrender value of
the insurance policy will offset the amount of expenses accrued. If a director fails for any reason
other than death to serve as a director during the entire five-year period, or the director fails
to attend at least 60 regular or special meetings, the amount to be received at age 65 or 70, as
applicable, will be pro-rated appropriately.



Directors also may be compensated under the Corporation’s 2001 Long-Term Incentive Plan. Under
this plan, directors may receive 90, 100 or 110 percent of the director’s “award amount” if the
Corporation and FFB attain certain goals established by the Corporation’s Compensation Committee.
See Exhibit 10.3 to this Form 10-K for a description of this plan.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000868663
<NAME>                        ENEX 90-91 INCOME & RETIREMENT FUND-SERIES 1, L.P.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              dec-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 jan-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   dec-31-1996
<CASH>                                         23892
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  22917
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               46809
<PP&E>                                         1324866
<DEPRECIATION>                                 837567
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 534108
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          20557
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     513551
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   534108
<SALES>                                        189306
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               189306
<CGS>                                          121089
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  121089
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               27779
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   40438
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 184 (Friday, September 22, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 55542]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-7989]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Region 3--Washington, DC District Advisory Council; Public 
Meeting

    The U.S. Small Business Administration Washington, DC District 
Advisory Council will host a public a meeting on Tuesday October 17, 
2006 from 9 a.m. until 11:30 a.m. The meeting will take place at the 
Washington Metropolitan Area District Office located at 740 15th 
Street, NW., 3rd Floor, Washington, DC 20005. The purpose of the 
meeting is to discuss the overview of the district's FY 2006 goals, 
update on new initiatives, and other matters that be presented by 
members, staff of the U.S SmallBusiness Administration, or others 
present.
    Anyone wishing to make an oral presentation to the Board must 
contact Joseph P. Loddo,District Director, Washington Metropolitan Area 
District Advisory Council, in writing by letter or fax no later than 
Tuesday, October 3, 2006, in order to be put on the agenda. Joseph P. 
Loddo, District Director, U.S. Small Business Administration, 
Washington Metropolitan Area District Office, 740 15th Street, NW., 3rd 
Floor, Washington, DC 20005. Telephone (202) 272-0345 or FAX (202) 272-
0270.

Thomas M. Dryer,
Acting Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 06-7989 Filed 9-21-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Submitted on record and briefs January 18,

reversed and remanded for reconsideration February 16, 1994

#### In the Matter of the Compensation of Thomas S. Ramirez, Claimant. Thomas S. RAMIREZ, Petitioner, *v.*OREGON ROOTSTOCK & TREE CO., INC., aka Treco, and Country Companies, *Respondents.*

(WCB 91-12087; CA A80509)

867 P2d 571

Quintin B. Estell and Estell and Bewley filed the brief for petitioner.

Paul A. Dakopolos and Garrett, Hemann, Robertson, Paulus, Jennings & Comstock, P.C., filed the brief for respondents.

Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Edmonds and Landau, Judges.

PER CURIAM

Reversed and remanded for reconsideration. *Pacheco-Gonzalez v. SAIF,*123 Or App 312, 860 P2d 822 (1993).
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 182 (Wednesday, September 20, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 55047]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-7788]



[[Page 55047]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i> 10614]


Arizona Disaster <greek-i> AZ-00005

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major 
disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Arizona (FEMA-
1660-DR), dated 09/07/2006.
    Incident: Severe Storms and Flooding.
    Incident Period: 07/25/2006 through 08/04/2006.
    Effective Date: 09/07/2006.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 11/06/2006.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the President's major disaster declaration on 09/07/2006, applications 
for Private Non-Profit organizations that provide essential services of 
a governmental nature may file disaster loan applications at the 
address listed above or other locally announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:
Primary Counties:
    Pima
    Pinal
    The Gila River Indian Community Within Pinal County.
    The Tohono O'odham Nation Within Pima and Pinal Counties.
    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                               (Percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Other (including non-profit organizations) with credit             5.000
 available elsewhere.........................................
Businesses and non-profit organizations without credit             4.000
 available elsewhere.........................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 10614.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)
Herbert L. Mitchell,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 06-7788 Filed 9-19-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Editorial Note on Part 622
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 622 appear at 79 FR 57837, Sept. 26, 2014 and at 81 FR 32253, May 23, 2016.

§ 622.516 Size limits. All size limits in this section are minimum size limits unless specified otherwise. A fish not in compliance with its size limit in or from the EEZ around St. Thomas and St. John may not be possessed, sold, or purchased, and must be released immediately with a minimum of harm. The operator of a vessel that fishes in the EEZ around St. Thomas and St. John is responsible for ensuring that all species on board are in compliance with the size limits specified in this section. See § 622.10 regarding requirements for landing fish intact. See § 622.520(c)(2) regarding requirements for landing spiny lobster intact. ( a ) *Reef fish.* ( 1 ) Yellowtail snapper—12 inches (30.5 cm), TL.
( 2 ) [Reserved]
( b ) [Reserved]
( c ) *Spiny lobster.* 3.5 inches (8.9 cm), carapace length.
# EUR-Lex - 12002E063 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 12002E063

**Treaty establishing the European Community (Nice consolidated version) - Part Three: Community policies - Title IV: Visas, asylum, immigration and other policies related to free movement of persons - Article 63 **

*
Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0058 - 0059 Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0202 - Consolidated version *

Treaty establishing the European Community (Nice consolidated version)

Part Three: Community policies

Title IV: Visas, asylum, immigration and other policies related to free movement of persons

Article 63

Article 63

The Council, acting in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 67, shall, within a period of five years after the entry into force of the Treaty of Amsterdam, adopt:

1. measures on asylum, in accordance with the Geneva Convention of 28 July 1951 and the Protocol of 31 January 1967 relating to the status of refugees and other relevant treaties, within the following areas:

(a) criteria and mechanisms for determining which Member State is responsible for considering an application for asylum submitted by a national of a third country in one of the Member States,

(b) minimum standards on the reception of asylum seekers in Member States,

(c) minimum standards with respect to the qualification of nationals of third countries as refugees,

(d) minimum standards on procedures in Member States for granting or withdrawing refugee status;

2. measures on refugees and displaced persons within the following areas:

(a) minimum standards for giving temporary protection to displaced persons from third countries who cannot return to their country of origin and for persons who otherwise need international protection,

(b) promoting a balance of effort between Member States in receiving and bearing the consequences of receiving refugees and displaced persons;

3. measures on immigration policy within the following areas:

(a) conditions of entry and residence, and standards on procedures for the issue by Member States of long-term visas and residence permits, including those for the purpose of family reunion,

(b) illegal immigration and illegal residence, including repatriation of illegal residents;

4. measures defining the rights and conditions under which nationals of third countries who are legally resident in a Member State may reside in other Member States.

Measures adopted by the Council pursuant to points 3 and 4 shall not prevent any Member State from maintaining or introducing in the areas concerned national provisions which are compatible with this Treaty and with international agreements.

Measures to be adopted pursuant to points 2(b), 3(a) and 4 shall not be subject to the five-year period referred to above.
#### § 28.21 General provisions.

Refuge managers and other authorized personnel are authorized pursuant to authority delegated from the Secretary and which has been published in the Federal Register (Administrative Manual 4 AM 4.2) to protect fish and wildlife and their habitat and prevent their disturbance, to protect Service lands, property, facilities, or interests therein and to insure the safety of the using public to the fullest degree possible. The control of recreational use will be enforced to meet these purposes pursuant to Federal, State, and local laws and regulations: The provisions of this subchapter C and any special regulations issued pursuant thereto; and the prohibitions and restrictions as posted.

[41 FR 9171, Mar. 3, 1976, as amended at 44 FR 42976, July 23, 1979; 51 FR 7575, Mar. 5, 1986]
----

            COUNCIL DECISION         

of 28 July 2005         

on the existence of an excessive deficit in Italy

(2005/694/EC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 104(6) thereof,

Having regard to the recommendation from the Commission,

Having regard to the observations made by Italy,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

From an overall assessment it follows that an excessive deficit exists in Italy.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Italian Republic.

Done at Brussels, 28 July 2005.

For the Council

The President

J. STRAW            

----

(1)OJ L 332, 31.12.1993, p. 7. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 351/2002 (OJ L 55, 26.2.2002, p. 23).

----
# EUR-Lex - 11957A096 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11957A096

**TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN ATOMIC ENERGY COMMUNITY ( E.A.E.C. - EURATOM ), TITLE TWO - PROVISIONS FOR THE ENCOURAGEMENT OF PROGRESS IN THE FIELD OF NUCLEAR ENERGY, CHAPTER IX: THE NUCLEAR COMMON MARKET, ARTICLE 96 **

*

*

++++

ARTICLE 96

THE MEMBER STATES SHALL ABOLISH ALL RESTRICTIONS BASED ON NATIONALITY AFFECTING THE RIGHT OF NATIONALS OF ANY MEMBER STATE TO TAKE SKILLED EMPLOYMENT IN THE FIELD OF NUCLEAR ENERGY , SUBJECT TO THE LIMITATIONS RESULTING FROM THE BASIC REQUIREMENTS OF PUBLIC POLICY , PUBLIC SECURITY OR PUBLIC HEALTH .

AFTER CONSULTING THE ASSEMBLY , THE COUNCIL MAY , ACTING BY A QUALIFIED MAJORITY ON A PROPOSAL FROM THE COMMISSION , WHICH SHALL FIRST REQUEST THE OPINION OF THE ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE , ISSUE DIRECTIVES FOR THE APPLICATION OF THIS ARTICLE .
**REGULATORY EVALUATION**

**Directorate Identifier:** 2014

- NM

- 0 29

- AD

**Executive Order 12866:** Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. I s it appropriate t o include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES ( ) explain NO (X)
Case 16-28584 Doc 1 Filed 09/07/16 Entered 09/07/16 09:46:56 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 9
Case 16-28584 Doc 1 Filed 09/07/16 Entered 09/07/16 09:46:56 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 9
Case 16-28584 Doc 1 Filed 09/07/16 Entered 09/07/16 09:46:56 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 9
Case 16-28584 Doc 1 Filed 09/07/16 Entered 09/07/16 09:46:56 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 9
Case 16-28584 Doc 1 Filed 09/07/16 Entered 09/07/16 09:46:56 Desc Main

 Document Page 5 of 9
Case 16-28584 Doc 1 Filed 09/07/16 Entered 09/07/16 09:46:56 Desc Main

 Document Page 6 of 9
Case 16-28584 Doc 1 Filed 09/07/16 Entered 09/07/16 09:46:56 Desc Main

 Document Page 7 of 9
Case 16-28584 Doc 1 Filed 09/07/16 Entered 09/07/16 09:46:56 Desc Main

 Document Page 8 of 9
Case 16-28584 Doc 1 Filed 09/07/16 Entered 09/07/16 09:46:56 Desc Main

 Document Page 9 of 9