alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

                                                                                     Exhibit 31

                                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF
                                     THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Andrew J. Cederoth, certify that:

1.       I have  reviewed  this  annual  report on Form 10-K,  and all  reports  on Form 8-K  containing
          distribution or servicing  reports filed in respect of periods included in the year covered by
          this annual report, of Navistar Financial Dealer Note Master Trust;

2.       Based on my knowledge,  the  information in these reports,  taken as a whole,  does not contain
          any untrue  statement of a material  fact or omit to state a material  fact  necessary to make
          the statements made, in light of the circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
          misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report;

3.       Based on my knowledge,  the  distribution or servicing  information  required to be provided to
          the trustee by the Servicer under the pooling and servicing agreement,  for inclusion in these
          reports, is included in these reports;

4.      I am responsible  for reviewing the activities  performed by the Servicer under the pooling and
          servicing  agreement  and based upon my  knowledge  and the  independent  public  accountants'
          servicing  report required under that agreement,  and except as disclosed in the reports,  the
          Servicer has fulfilled its obligations under that agreement; and

5.      The reports disclose all significant  deficiencies  relating to the Servicer's  compliance with
          the  minimum  servicing  standards  based upon the report  provided by an  independent  public
          accountant,  after  conducting  a review in  compliance  with the Uniform  Single  Attestation
          Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar  procedure,  as set forth in the Pooling and Servicing
          Agreement, that is included in these reports.

6.      In giving the certifications  above, I have reasonably relied on information  provided to me by
          the following unaffiliated parties: Master Trust Trustee.

                                          NAVISTAR FINANCIAL DEALER NOTE MASTER TRUST

                                      By:   Navistar Financial Securities Corporation
                                            (Seller)

                                      By:  /s/ Andrew J. Cederoth
                                               Andrew J. Cederoth
                                               Vice President and Treasurer

October 16, 2003
```
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 5295 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 5295

 To direct the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration to 
  enter into appropriate arrangements with the National Academies of 
  Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine to provide for a report on the 
   health impacts of air traffic noise and pollution, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 12, 2024

Ms. Warren (for herself and Mr. Markey) introduced the following bill; 
    which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 
                      Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To direct the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration to 
  enter into appropriate arrangements with the National Academies of 
  Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine to provide for a report on the 
   health impacts of air traffic noise and pollution, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Air Traffic Noise and Pollution 
Expert Consensus Act of 2024''.

SEC. 2. HEALTH IMPACTS OF AIR TRAFFIC NOISE AND POLLUTION.

    (a) Study.--The Administrator of the Federal Aviation 
Administration shall enter into appropriate arrangements with the 
Health and Medicine Division of the National Academies of Sciences, 
Engineering, and Medicine under which the Division will--
            (1) not later than 30 days after the date of enactment of 
        this Act, convene a committee of experts in health and 
        environmental science to examine the various health impacts of 
        air traffic noise and pollution; and
            (2) issue a corresponding expert consensus report that sets 
        forth current scientific knowledge relating to the various 
        health impacts of air traffic noise and pollution.
    (b) Report.--Upon completion of the consensus report, the Division 
shall transmit the report to--
            (1) the Administrator;
            (2) the Secretary of Health and Human Services;
            (3) the Administrator of the Environmental Protection 
        Agency;
            (4) the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure and 
        the Committee on Oversight and Reform of the House of 
        Representatives; and
            (5) the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 
        and the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 
        of the Senate.
                                 <all>
```
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-40421 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ARGIE PRUITT, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 5:98-CR-17-2

-------------------- November 5, 1999 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * Argie Pruitt appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for acquittal in his trial for conspiracy to distribute marijuana and possession of marijuana with intent to distribute. The evidence presented in this case, and reasonable inferences drawn therefrom, showed that Pruitt was present in a known drug location at a time when he might not otherwise have been expected to be present, that he did not express surprise or confusion when Culps arrived at his house, that he took possession of a boxNo. 99-40421 -2- containing marijuana and acknowledged that he was aware of its contents, that he attempted to prevent detection by police by preventing entry into the premises, and that he was in possession of a small quantity of marijuana and drug distribution paraphernalia. Such evidence is sufficient to sustain the jury’s verdict. See United States v. Espinoza-Seanez , 862 F.2d 526, 536 (5th Cir. 1988); United States v. Gonzalez , 121 F.3d 928, 936 (5th Cir. 1997). The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
"



# Vanguard Atlantic Ltd.

. 1 - ' - - , i . . . , ~; 13 October, 2013 Robert Bevilacqua, Supervisor Town ofHarrietstown 39 Main Street Saranac Lake NY 12983 Dear Bob: I am writing as the principal shareholder of Vanguard Atlantic Ltd., a private equity firm headquartered in Harrietstown. Our inve s tment portfolio includes properties in France, England , and across the U.S. Our business involve s face-to-face meetings with invested and prospective companies. While we 

### try to have meetings in Boston, the preferred venue for meetings with the principals and boards of these companies is New York City. If air service from Adirondack Airport to New York City (or Westchester) were available my company would u s e it exten s ively, including hosting business meeting s here and flying south for meetings in New York. I encourage you and the board to bring service to New York City (or Westchester) to our airport. Sincerely , 

# 1 ~~m - f i "- I

_ Ernest E . [Lee] Keet President

P.O . Box 1199 Saranac Lake, NY 12983 Phone: +1 [877] 533-5338 Fax: + 1 [8 7 7] 32 9 -28 2 5

www . Vanguardatl antic . com Fed Tax ID # 0 6 -1114169 email : info @ VanguarciAll antic . c om
U.S. Department of Justice

Office of Community Oriented Policing Services

 Fact Sheet cops.usdoj.gov

2022 Community Policing Development Program

Community Policing Development (CPD) funds are used to develop the capacity of law enforcement to implement com-

-

munity policing strategies by providing guidance on promising practices through the development and testing of innovative 

strategies; building knowledge about effective practices and outcomes; and supporting new, creative approaches to preventing 

crime and promoting safe communities. The 2022 CPD program funded projects that develop knowledge, increase awareness 

of effective community policing strategies, increase the skills and abilities of law enforcement and community partners, increase 

the number of law enforcement agencies and relevant stakeholders using proven community policing practices, and institution

alize community policing practice in routine business.

COPS Office Community Policing 

Development Awards

The 2022 CPD program funded projects related to the 

following categories and subcategories:

	Accreditation

• Addressing Gaps in State Accreditation

• Enhancing Existing Law Enforcement 

Accreditation Entities

• Supporting Law Enforcement Agencies in 

Seeking Accreditation

	De-Escalation Training

• Expansion of Regional De-Escalation Training Centers

• Law Enforcement De-Escalation Training Grants

	Implementation of Crisis Intervention Teams

	Innovations in Recruitment and Hiring

	Microgrants

• Builting Trust and Legitimacy with the Community

• Community Violence Intervention

• Hate Crimes and Domestic Terrorism

• Officer Recruitment and Retention

• Underserved Populations

	Tolerance, Diversity, and Anti-Bias Online Training

The full listing of awarded projects is located on the COPS 

Office website at https://cops.usdoj.gov/cpd.

Funding Provisions

Provisions include the following:

	In FY 2022, the COPS Office awarded $33.3 million 

under the CPD program.

	Generally, the CPD program was open to all public gov-

-

-

ernmental agencies, for-profit and nonprofit institutions, 

institutions of higher education, community groups, and 

faith-based organizations. Categories and subcategories 

had individual eligibility criteria. Accepted proposals were 

responsive to the category—and, if applicable, subcat

egory—selected, significantly advanced the field of com

munity policing, and demonstrated an understanding of 

community policing.

September 2022

Contact the COPS Office

For more information about COPS Office 

programs and resources, please call the COPS 

Office Response Center at 800-421-6770 or visit 

the COPS Office website at https://cops.usdoj.gov.
FY22 Community Policing Development Program Map

2

2022 Community Policing Development Program

September 2022
# EUR-Lex - 11992E048 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11992E048

**TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY - PART THREE: COMMUNITY POLICIES - TITLE III: FREE MOVEMENT OF PERSONS, SERVICES AND CAPITAL - CHAPTER 1: WORKERS - ARTICLE 48 /* CODIFIED VERSION OF THE TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY */ **

*
Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0020 *

Article 48

1. Freedom of movement for workers shall be secured within the Community by the end of the transitional period at the latest.

2. Such freedom of movement shall entail the abolition of any discrimination based on nationality between workers of the Member States as regards employment, remuneration and other conditions of work and employment.

3. It shall entail the right, subject to limitations justified on grounds of public policy, public security or public health:

(a) to accept offers of employment actually made;

(b) to move freely within the territory of Member States for this purpose;

(c) to stay in a Member State for the purpose of employment in accordance with the provisions governing the employment of nationals of that State laid down by law, regulation or administrative action;

(d) to remain in the territory of a Member State after having been employed in that State, subject to conditions which shall be embobied in implementing regulations to be drawn up by the Commission.

4. The provisions of this Article shall not apply to employment in the public service.
# Map            Switzerland.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

June 26, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
133567 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 133567 COA: 265830 Oakland CC: 2005-202983-FH STEVEN PATRICK SIEBIGTEROTH, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 1, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

s0618 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 26, 2007

Clerk
Your session is about to expire.Resume session

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Welcome.Log inorregisterCOPS OFFICE RESOURCE CENTER

HomeCatalogCartOrders

                    

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                CatalogMatches: 1Offline form Recent Popular Online Print OtherCOPS-W0942Developing a Critical Incident Peer Support Program: Model PolicyThis comprehensive project focused on strengthening programs that help families support officers in mental or emotional crises or considering suicide. The suite of six publications includes four reports documenting innovative interventions currently being used around the country, one protocol for agencies on how to address an officer suicide, and a resources abstract. This publication, Developing a Critical Incident Peer Support Program, discusses the use of peer support programs to effectively deal with the stress of law enforcement officers nationwide. Recognizing that peer support programs offer an effective complement to the provision of professional mental health services in contemporary law enforcement agencies, this paper examines three areas - (1) the elements of an effective peer support program, (2) confidentiality in such a program, and (3) the activities of five existing peer support programs.By James D. SewellCategories: Police OperationsLanguage: EnglishPublic linkhttps://portal.cops.usdoj.gov/resourcecenter?item=cops-w0942Click here to see the entire catalog.Cart:Download PDFWeb • Jun 2021Search catalogreset title abstract authors contentContaining text: exact phraseNot containing text: exact phraseLanguage:anyEnglishSpanishHmongVietnameseCategory:anyAlternatives to IncarcerationCommunity PartnershipsData and AnalysisEthics and IntegrityFoundations of Community PolicingHiring, Recruitment, and RetentionHomeland SecurityNew Immigrant CommunitiesNonviolent CrimeOtherPolice OperationsPOP Center ResourceSchool and Campus SafetyTechnologyTribalViolent CrimeYouth SafetyPublished after:Published before:Page1

                    

FOIA | No FEAR Act | Open Government | Privacy | Legal|HelpCopyright (C) U.S. Department of Justice, COPS Office, IT Division, 2012 - 2024. All rights reserved.
Rendered on Mon Mar 4 2024 at 04:49 (UTC-5) in 0.89 secEnterprise Framework 3.21.7.7 • Store Controls 3.3.1.7Survey 500303407 Section 60000560 Rules Hints Inactive
§ 600.117 Council coordination committee (CCC). ( a ) The Councils may establish a Council coordination committee (CCC) consisting of the chairs, vice chairs, and executive directors of each of the eight Councils or other Council members or staff, in order to discuss issues of relevance to all Councils.
( b ) The CCC is not subject to the requirements of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App. 2). Procedures for announcing and conducting open and closed meetings of the CCC shall be in accordance with § 600.135.
[75 FR 59150, Sept. 27, 2010]
H. R. 5102

One Hundred Third Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twenty-fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-four

An Act

To amend title 18, United States Code, with respect to certain crimes relating

to Congressional medals of honor.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled, That section

704(b)(2)(B) of title 18, United States Code, is amended by inserting

‘‘, 6241, or 8741’’ after ‘‘3741’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                              ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP






                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference in this Form 10-K of our report dated February 16, 1997 included in
Allied Capital Advisers, Inc.'s Annual Report to security holders. It should be
noted that we have not audited any financial statements of the company
subsequent to December 31, 1996 or performed any audit procedures subsequent to
the date of our report.


                                                  /s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Washington, D.C.
March 27, 1997
<PAGE>   2
                             ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent public accountants we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference in the registration statement on Form S-8 File No. 33-17885, of our
report dated February 16, 1997 incorporated by reference in Allied Capital
Advisers, Inc.'s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996 and to all
references to our Firm included in such registration statement.


                                                  /s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Washington, D.C.
March 27, 1997
Case 16-26259 Doc 9 Filed 08/18/16 Entered 08/19/16 08:56:56 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
Case 16-28263 Doc 1 Filed 09/01/16 Entered 09/01/16 15:18:03 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 9
Case 16-28263 Doc 1 Filed 09/01/16 Entered 09/01/16 15:18:03 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 9
Case 16-28263 Doc 1 Filed 09/01/16 Entered 09/01/16 15:18:03 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 9
Case 16-28263 Doc 1 Filed 09/01/16 Entered 09/01/16 15:18:03 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 9
Case 16-28263 Doc 1 Filed 09/01/16 Entered 09/01/16 15:18:03 Desc Main

 Document Page 5 of 9
Case 16-28263 Doc 1 Filed 09/01/16 Entered 09/01/16 15:18:03 Desc Main

 Document Page 6 of 9
Case 16-28263 Doc 1 Filed 09/01/16 Entered 09/01/16 15:18:03 Desc Main

 Document Page 7 of 9
Case 16-28263 Doc 1 Filed 09/01/16 Entered 09/01/16 15:18:03 Desc Main

 Document Page 8 of 9
Case 16-28263 Doc 1 Filed 09/01/16 Entered 09/01/16 15:18:03 Desc Main

 Document Page 9 of 9
# EUR-Lex - 12004V311 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V311

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART III — THE POLICIES AND FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - TITLE V — THE UNION'S EXTERNAL ACTION - CHAPTER II — COMMON FOREIGN AND SECURITY POLICY - Section 2 — The common security and defence policy - Article III-311 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0139 - 0140 *

Article III-311

1. The Agency in the field of defence capabilities development, research, acquisition and armaments (European Defence Agency), established by Article I-41(3) and subject to the authority of the Council, shall have as its task to:

(a) contribute to identifying the Member States' military capability objectives and evaluating observance of the capability commitments given by the Member States;

(b) promote harmonisation of operational needs and adoption of effective, compatible procurement methods;

(c) propose multilateral projects to fulfil the objectives in terms of military capabilities, ensure coordination of the programmes implemented by the Member States and management of specific cooperation programmes;

(d) support defence technology research, and coordinate and plan joint research activities and the study of technical solutions meeting future operational needs;

(e) contribute to identifying and, if necessary, implementing any useful measure for strengthening the industrial and technological base of the defence sector and for improving the effectiveness of military expenditure.

2. The European Defence Agency shall be open to all Member States wishing to be part of it. The Council, acting by a qualified majority, shall adopt a European decision defining the Agency's statute, seat and operational rules. That decision should take account of the level of effective participation in the Agency's activities. Specific groups shall be set up within the Agency bringing together Member States engaged in joint projects. The Agency shall carry out its tasks in liaison with the Commission where necessary.

--------------------------------------------------
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.01
 
               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
 
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 No. 33-74712, 33-83858, 33-07795 and 333-25927) pertaining to the 1985
Stock Option Plan, 1991 Executive Stock Option Plan, 1993 Equity Incentive Plan,
1993 Directors Stock Option Plan and 1993 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of
VERITAS Software Corporation of our report dated January 27, 1999, with respect
to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of VERITAS Software
Corporation included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 1998.
 
                                                               ERNST & YOUNG LLP
 
San Jose, California
March 26, 1999
<PAGE>





EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Biophan Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended August 31, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Michael L. Weiner, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to the best
of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec.
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

October 6, 2004

/s/Michael L. Weiner
----------------------
Michael L. Weiner
Chief Executive Officer