alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       4,468,062
<SECURITIES>                                   175,617
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,767,212
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,996,644
<PP&E>                                      18,578,185
<DEPRECIATION>                               8,461,236
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,457,880
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          632,892
<BONDS>                                      3,688,947
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,136,041
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,457,880
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,945,128
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,468,673
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             338,932
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                137,523
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            137,523
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   137,523
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### §§ 550.131-550.139 [Reserved]
Exhibit 32.2



RENTECH, INC.



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Rentech, Inc., (the Company) on Form
10-K/A, Amendment No. 1, for the year ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kevin M. Smith, Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



and



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |                                                     
|----------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Dated: January 30, 2006 |  | /s/ Kevin M. Smith                                  
|                        |  | Kevin M. Smith                                      
|                        |  | Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President



This certification is being furnished
solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, is not a part of the Form 10-K to which it refers, and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.
Exhibit 32.2

SATELLITE SECURITY CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Satellite
Security Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Aidan Shields, Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |  |  |     |  |                   |  |                        
|----------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ----------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: November 16, 2006 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Aidan Shields
|                        |  |  |  |     |  |                   |  | Aidan Shields          
|                        |  |  |  |     |  |                   |  | Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**AD Economic Evaluation**



### Docket No . FAA - 2015 - 2994 Directorate ID : 2014 - SW - 057 - AD Helicopter Model: Airbus Helicopters Deutschland GmbH Model MBB - BK 117 C - 2 helicopters Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 109 Helicopters in the US Registry . Reason : The actions of this AD are intended to prevent loss of an external load or person from the hoist resulting in injury to persons being lifted and loss of control of the helicopter. Costs : Parts per Helicopter $125 for the pr otection sleeve installation $224 for the wiring harness replacement Labor per Helicopter ( 1.5 work hours X $85 for inspection) (2 work hours X $85 for protection sleeve installation) (minimal amount of labor time for the wiring harness replacement) $ 128 $170

Other (Explain) Total Cost per Helicopter $128 for the inspection $295 for the protection sleeve installation $224 for the wiring harness replacement Total U . S . Fleet Cost $13,952 for the inspection $32,155 for the protection sleeve insta llation Executive Order 12866 : Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No (  ) DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures : Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No (  ) Regulatory Flexibility Act : Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Yes ( ) No (  ) Project Engineer : George Schwab
Delta Doctors Program – J-1 Visa Waiver Compliance Guidelines 

Effective: October 15, 2022

J-1 Visa Waiver Program

Compliance Guidelines

The Delta Regional Authority will administer compliance of the J-1 Visa Waiver Program in 

three steps:

1. The administrator of the facility and the physician will sign and return the “Physician 

Employment Verification Form”, within the first week that the physician begins work. 

Include copies of documentation that physician is in H-1B status including approval 

notices from USCIS, the physician's I-94 forms and a copy of the H-1B visa stamp from 

the physician's passport if the physician has already been granted an H-1B visa. If the 

physician was not licensed in the state of practice at the time the application for the 

waiver was submitted, a copy of the physician’s state medical license must be included 

with this form.

2. Compliance Surveys are due on June 30th and December 31st of each year. The surveys 

will be completed and returned separately to the DRA by both the J-1 physician and the 

administrator of the facility. The surveys are not identical and will ask confidential 

questions to both the J-1 physician and the administrator. This survey also requests the 

number of Medicare, Medicaid, and indigent patients that the facility and the physician 

has treated in that six-month period, and whether both parties have otherwise complied 

with the terms of the DRA J-1 Visa Waiver Program.

The DRA has established formal deadlines for these surveys. Both surveys should be 

returned to the DRA within 15 business days from the due date. If both surveys are not 

returned within the initial 15 business days, the DRA will notify the employer that the 

survey(s) should be returned within an extension period of 15 business days. If the 

surveys are not returned within the extension period and if the employer has made no 

effort or attempt to comply with DRA Compliance Guidelines, DRA will notify the 

appropriate agencies that compliance efforts were unsuccessful and recommend the 

taking of appropriate enforcement actions.

3. The DRA or an agent representing the DRA will conduct unannounced site visits at 

random during the three-year employment period. If the physician or employer is found 

to be out of compliance, the DRA will immediately notify the appropriate agencies and 

recommend the taking of appropriate enforcement actions.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration 

# AGENCY:

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

                        FMCSA announces that it has published an opportunity to apply for FY2007 Border Enforcement Grant (BEG) funding on the grants.gov Web site. Section 4110 of the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy For Users established the BEG program. The program is a discretionary grant program that provides funding for border commercial motor vehicle (CMV) safety programs and related enforcement activities and projects. An entity or a State that shares a land border with another country is eligible to receive grant funding. To apply for funding, applicants must register online with the grants.gov Web site (                        *http://www.grants.gov/​applicants/​get_​registered.jsp*), and submit an application in accordance with instructions provided. Applications for grant funding must be submitted electronically to the FMCSA through the grants.gov Web site.                     

# DATES:

FMCSA will initially consider funding of applications submitted by November 1, 2006 for qualified applicants. If additional funding remains available, applications submitted after November 1, 2006 will be considered on a case-by-case basis. Funds will not be available for allocation until such time as FY2007 appropriations legislation is passed and signed into law. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mr. Milt Schmidt, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, Office of Safety Programs, North American Borders Division (MC-ESB), (518) 431-4239, extension 262, Leo W. O'Brien Federal Building, Room 742, Clinton Avenue and North Pearl Street, Albany, New York 12207. Office hours are from 7:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., e.t., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. 

Issued on: September 15, 2006. 

John H. Hill, 

Administrator. 

[FR Doc. 06-8121 Filed 9-22-06; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P
ATTACHMENT H Projected 2012 and 2022 Emissions Inventories (Files available on accompanying CD.)
# EUR-Lex - 12004V/AFI/DCL/21 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V/AFI/DCL/21

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - FINAL ACT - A.Declarations concerning provisions of the Constitution - 21.Declaration on Article III-248 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0462 - 0462 *

21. Declaration on Article III-248

The Conference agrees that the Union's action in the area of research and technological development will pay due respect to the fundamental orientations and choices of the research policies of the Member States.

--------------------------------------------------
Your session is about to expire.Resume session

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Welcome.Log inorregisterCOPS OFFICE RESOURCE CENTER

HomeCatalogCartOrders

                    

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                CatalogMatches: 1Offline form Recent Popular Online Print OtherCOPS-P308A Prosecutor's Stand: A Guide for Law EnforcementThis guide is designed to help law enforcement representatives facilitate discussions and training sessions in conjunction with screenings of the 24-minute Not In Our Town film A Prosecutor's Stand. Produced in collaboration with the COPS Office, the film examines recent hate crimes in San Francisco, California, and explores the nature of these crimes, trauma faced by victims, and common challenges in investigating and prosecuting these cases. Interviews with prosecutors, the district attorney, victims, victim liaisons, and others demonstrate the important interplay between hate crime victims, law enforcement, and the greater community. The guide provides discussion questions for use in internal agency trainings and community screenings, as well as a hate crimes fact sheet and a list of supplemental resources. Used together, the film and guide can help agencies work to prevent hate crimes, improve hate crime reporting, enhance investigations and prosecutions, and support victims.By Paul Sheridan, Michele Dahee Kloss, Libby McInernyCategories: Community PartnershipsLanguage: EnglishPublic linkhttps://portal.cops.usdoj.gov/resourcecenter?item=cops-p308Click here to see the entire catalog.Cart:Download PDFBook • Sep 2015Search catalogreset title abstract authors contentContaining text: exact phraseNot containing text: exact phraseLanguage:anyEnglishSpanishHmongVietnameseCategory:anyAlternatives to IncarcerationCommunity PartnershipsData and AnalysisEthics and IntegrityFoundations of Community PolicingHiring, Recruitment, and RetentionHomeland SecurityNew Immigrant CommunitiesNonviolent CrimeOtherPolice OperationsPOP Center ResourceSchool and Campus SafetyTechnologyTribalViolent CrimeYouth SafetyPublished after:Published before:Page1

                    

FOIA | No FEAR Act | Open Government | Privacy | Legal|HelpCopyright (C) U.S. Department of Justice, COPS Office, IT Division, 2012 - 2024. All rights reserved.
Rendered on Mon Mar 4 2024 at 06:00 (UTC-5) in 0.19 secEnterprise Framework 3.21.7.7 • Store Controls 3.3.1.7Survey 500303407 Section 60000560 Rules Hints Inactive
#### § 665.420 Mariana coral reef ecosystem fisheries. [Reserved]
|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 The foregoing certification is beingfurnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C.section  1350 and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated byreference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the datehereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in suchfiling.

| Dated:  December      10, 2010 | By:    | A. Noel DeWinter                                                  |
|------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                     |   |                                                              |
|                                     |   | Chief      Financial Officer and PrincipalAccounting      Officer |

----
#### § 29.44 If I am operating without prior Service authorization, what do I need to do?

Any operator that has commenced operations prior to December 14, 2016 in accordance with applicable local, State, and Federal laws and regulations may continue without an operations permit. However, your operation is subject to the requirements of §§ 29.60 through 29.64, Pre-Existing Operations, and the requirements that when you propose to conduct new operations, modify your pre-existing operations, conduct well plugging and reclamation operations, or obtain an extension of the well plugging requirement to maintain your well in shut-in status, you must obtain an operations permit in accordance with §§ 29.90 through 29.97, Operations Permit: Application, and all applicable requirements of this subpart.
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

No. 99-50858

Summary Calendar

DANNY ZACEK; ALBERT SANDOVAL,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

VERSUS

NORTH EAST INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Western District of Texas

(SA-98-CV-533-OG)

March 28, 2000

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Danny Zacek and Albert Sandoval (hereinafter "plaintiffs")

sued their employer, North East Independent School District

(hereinafter "NEISD") in state district court in Bexar County,

Texas, alleging (1) claims for retaliation for whistle blower

activities of plaintiffs under chapter 21 of the Texas Labor Code;

(2) discrimination because of national origin in violation of Title

VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act; and (3) retaliation for filing
2

claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. NEISD removed the

case to the federal district court on grounds of federal question;

and after substantial discovery, NEISD moved for summary judgment.

The district judge referred the summary judgment motion to the

magistrate judge for memorandum and recommendation under 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(d); and the magistrate judge filed a 26-page memorandum and

report recommending that the court grant NEISD’s motion for summary

judgment because plaintiffs had failed to identify evidence

creating a genuine issue of material fact as to an essential

element of each of their claims. Plaintiffs filed objections to

the magistrate judge’s report and the district judge entered an

eight-page order accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendations.

Accordingly, the district court entered a final judgment in favor

of NEISD and denying relief to plaintiffs. Plaintiffs timely

appealed.

We have carefully reviewed the briefs, the reply brief, the

record excerpts, and relevant portions of the summary judgment

record. For the reasons stated by the magistrate judge in her

memorandum and report which were adopted by the district court in

its order filed July 13, 1999, we have concluded that the final

judgment entered by the district court on July 13, 1999, should be

and the same is hereby

AFFIRMED.
###### Editorial Note on [Part 1926](/current/title-29/part-1926?toc=1)

#### Editorial Notes:

1. At [44 FR 8577](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/44-FR-8577), Feb. 9, 1979, and corrected at [44 FR 20940](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/44-FR-20940), Apr. 6, 1979, OSHA reprinted without change the entire text of [29 CFR part 1926](/on/2024-09-23/title-29/part-1926) together with certain General Industry Occupational Safety and Health Standards contained in [29 CFR part 1910](/on/2024-09-23/title-29/part-1910), which have been identified as also applicable to construction work. This republication developed a single set of OSHA regulations for both labor and management forces within the construction industry.

2. Nomenclature changes to part 1926 appear at [84 FR 21597](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/84-FR-21597), May 14, 2019.

#### § 1926.1145 Acrylonitrile.

Note:

The requirements applicable to construction work under this section are identical to those set forth at [§ 1910.1045 of this chapter](/on/2024-09-23/title-29/section-1910.1045).

[[61 FR 31434](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/61-FR-31434), June 20, 1996]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000868664
<NAME>                        ENEX OIL & GAS INCOME PROGRAM V - SERIES 1, L.P.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              dec-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 jan-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   dec-31-1996
<CASH>                                         24647
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  72772
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               101605
<PP&E>                                         1607043
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1237577
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 471071
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          63038
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     408033
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   471071
<SALES>                                        403034
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               403034
<CGS>                                          378409
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  418395
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               39986
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (14404)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>