alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Merrimack,

No. 4829.

#### Willard Uphaus *v.*Louis C. Wyman, *Attorney General.*

Argued June 8, 1960.

Decided June 27, 1960.

*Orr •& Reno, Hugh H. Bownes,*and also *Royal W. France*and *Leonard B. Boutin*(both of New York) and *Louis Lusky*and *518
      *Marvin H. Morse*(both of Kentucky) *(Mr. Reno*orally), for the motion.

*Louis C. Wyman,*Attorney General (by brief and orally), opposed.

Per curiam.

The plaintiff’s motion alleges that he now proposes to seek review by the United States Supreme Court of the decision of this court handed down on March 31, 1960. *Wyman*v. *Uphaus,*102 N. H. 461. It indicates that one basis for the review to be sought arises out of the expiration on June 30, 1957 of the legislation which directed the Attorney General “to determine whether subversive persons . . . are presently located within this state” (Laws 1953, c. 307; Laws 1955, cc. 197, 340), and the alleged imposition of limitations upon the previous authority of the Attorney General by the enactment on June 14, 1957 of RSA 588:8a. Laws 1957, c. 178. We are urged to suspend the order of committal entered on December 14, 1959, so that review may be had before committal shall end.

The statutory changes thus relied upon occurred before this case was remanded to this court following vacation of its earlier judgment by the United States Supreme Court on October 14, 1957. *Uphaus*v. *Wyman,*355 U. S. 16. In November 1957, the plaintiff, in this court, opposed reinstatement of the judgment *(Wyman*v. *Uphaus,*101 N. H. 139), and in November 1958, before the United States Supreme Court, argued his appeal from the reinstated judgment which was affirmed on June 8, 1959. *Uphaus*v. *Wyman,*360 U. S. 72.

Our opinion of March 31, 1960, did not turn upon any holding that RSA 588:8a provided an extension of the legislative investigation first authorized in 1953. The plaintiff stands committed for refusal, while Laws 1955, c. 197, was still in effect, to comply with an order entered prior to enactment of RSA 588:8a.

Between January 5, 1956 and December 14, 1959, the plaintiff was at large upon bail. See *Wyman*v. *Uphaus,*100 N. H. 436, 438. Yet the issues relied upon to support the review now to be sought although available to the plaintiff after June 1957, were not presented in the pending proceedings at any time, until first advanced before the Superior Court on December 14, 1959, the day on which the order of committal was entered. Other issues presented by the motion have been briefed and argued many times by competent counsel who have ably protected the plaintiff’s rights.

*519This case has been repeatedly before the courts of this state and the United States Supreme Court, since 1954. See *Wyman*v. *Uphaus,*100 N. H. 1; *Wyman*v. *Uphaus,*100 N. H. 436; *Uphaus*v. *Wyman.*355 U. S. 16; *Uphaus*v. *Wyman,*356 U. S. 926, 965; *Wyman*v. *Uphaus,*101 N. H. 139; *Uphaus*v. *Wyman,*360 U. S. 72; *Wyman*v. *Uphaus,*102 N. H. 324; *Wyman*v. *Uphaus,*102 N. H. 461.

An examination of the pending motion in the light of the entire history of the case convinces us that there is no occasion to grant the relief sought.

*Motion denied.*

All concurred.
Glenn Stearns, Chapter 13 Trustee

801 Warrenville Road, Suite 650

Lisle, IL 60532-4350

Ph: (630) 981-3888 Fax: (630) 981-3896

In re:

Tymika B Rush Case No. 16-27472

Account No. 4290

US DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT

% NOVAD MANAGEMENT CONSULTING LLC

2401 NW 23RD ST #1A1

OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 73107

GERACI LAW LLC

55 E MONROE #3400

CHICAGO, IL 60603

NOTICE OF PAYMENT OF FINAL MORTGAGE CURE UNDER RULE 3002.1 (f)

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 3002.1(f), the Chapter 13 Trustee, Glenn B. Stearns, files 

this Notice of Final Cure Payment. The amount required to cure the default in the claim has been paid in full.

Within 21 days of the service of the Notice of Final Cure Payment, the creditor MUST file and serve a 

Statement as a supplement to the holder's proof of claim on the debtor(s), debtor(s) Counsel and the Chapter 13 

Trustee, pursuant to Fed.R.Bank.P.3002.1(g), indicating:

1) Whether it agrees that the debtor(s) have paid in full the amount required to cure the default on the claim; 

and

2) Whether the debtor(s) are otherwise current on all payments consistent with 11 U.S.C. § 1322(b)(5).

The statement shall itemize the required cure or post-petition amounts, if any, that the holder contends remain 

unpaid as of the date of the statement, The statement shall be filed as a supplement to the holder's proof of claim 

and is not subject to Rule 3001(f). Failure to notify may result in sanctions.

The undersigned certifies that this notice was sent to the above named parties on February 26, 2019 .

 /S/ Ryan Faye

For: Glenn Stearns, Chapter 13 Trustee, Standing Trustee

Case 16-27472 Doc 41 Filed 02/26/19 Entered 02/26/19 14:33:23 Desc Page 1

 of 1
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 482

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exempt certain personal

service corporations from restrictions on deducting accrued year-end regular periodic compensation payable to owner-employees.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 6, 1993

Mr. STARK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exempt

certain personal service corporations from restrictions on

deducting accrued year-end regular periodic compensation payable to owner-employees.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DEDUCTION BY PERSONAL SERVICE CORPORA4 TION OF CERTAIN ACCRUED YEAR-END COM5 PENSATION PAYABLE TO OWNER-EMPLOY6 EES.

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 267 of the Internal Reve8 nue Code of 1986 (relating to losses, expenses, and inter-
2

•HR 482 IH

1 est with respect to transactions between related taxpayers)

2 is amended by adding at the end thereof the following new

3 subsection:

4 ‘‘(h) YEAR-END REGULAR COMPENSATION PAID TO

5 OWNER-EMPLOYEES OF PERSONAL SERVICE CORPORA6 TION.—

7 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—In the case of a qualified

8 personal service corporation, the last sentence of

9 subsection (a)(2) shall not apply to qualified com10 pensation to be paid by such corporation to any em11 ployee who is not a key employee (as defined in sec12 tion 416(i)).

13 ‘‘(2) QUALIFIED COMPENSATION.—For pur14 poses of paragraph (1), the term ‘qualified com15 pensation’ means compensation payable to an em16 ployee for the payroll period ending at the close of

17 such corporation’s taxable year if—

18 ‘‘(A) such payroll period is a semi-monthly

19 or shorter period,

20 ‘‘(B) such employee is regularly paid on

21 the basis of semi-monthly or shorter payroll pe22 riods, and

23 ‘‘(C) such compensation is solely for hours

24 of service performed or is such payroll period’s
3

•HR 482 IH

1 ratable share of such employee’s annual basic

2 rate of compensation.

3 ‘‘(3) QUALIFIED PERSONAL SERVICE CORPORA4 TION.—For purposes of paragraph (1), the term

5 ‘qualified personal service corporation’ means any

6 personal service corporation (within the meaning of

7 section 441(i)(2)) using an accrual method of ac8 counting for its last taxable year ending before the

9 date of the enactment of this subsection.’’

10 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

11 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after

12 December 31, 1992.

Æ
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

# Agency Holding the Meeting:

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

# Federal Register Citation of Previous Announcement:

71 FR 54282, Thursday, September 14, 2006.

# Previously Announced Time and Date of Meeting:

Thursday, September 21, 2006, 10 a.m. (Eastern Time).

# Change in the Meeting:

The meeting has been cancelled.

# Contact Person for More Information:

Stephen Llewellyn, Acting Executive Officer on (202) 663-4070.

Dated: September 19, 2006.

Stephen Llewellyn,

Acting Executive Officer, Executive Secretariat.

[FR Doc. 06-8118  Filed 9-19-06; 3:26 pm]

BILLING CODE 6570-01-M
###### Editorial Note on [Subchapter A of Chapter VIII](/current/title-7/chapter-VIII/subchapter-A)

#### Authority:

[7 U.S.C. 71-87K](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/7/71), [1621-1627](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/7/1621).

###### Editorial Note on [Subchapter A of Chapter VIII](/current/title-7/chapter-VIII/subchapter-A)

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at [84 FR 45645](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/84-FR-45645), Aug. 30, 2019.

#### § 868.312 Grade and grade requirements for the class Screenings Milled Rice. (See also [§ 868.315](/on/2024-09-20/title-7/section-868.315).)

Grades, Grade Requirements, and Grade Designations

| Grade | Maximum limits of— | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Paddy kernels and seeds | | Chalky kernels1 3 (percent) | Color requirements1 | Minimum milling requirements2 |
| Total (number in 500 grams) | Objectionable seeds (number in 500 grams) |
| U.S. No. 14 5 | 30 | 20 | 5.0 | White or Creamy | Well milled. |
| U.S. No. 24 5 | 75 | 50 | 8.0 | Slightly gray | Well milled. |
| U.S. No. 34 5 | 125 | 90 | 12.0 | Light gray or slightly rosy | Reasonably well milled. |
| U.S. No. 44 5 | 175 | 140 | 20.0 | Gray or rosy | Reasonably well milled. |
| U.S. No. 5 | 250 | 200 | 30.0 | Dark gray or very rosy | Reasonably well milled. |
| U.S. Sample grade: | | | | | |
| U.S. Sample grade shall be milled rice of this class which: (a) Does not meet the requirements for any of the grades from U.S. No. 1 to U.S. No. 5, inclusive; (b) contains more than 15.0 percent of moisture; (c) is musty or sour, or heating; (d) has any commercially objectionable foreign odor; (e) has a badly damaged or extremely red appearance (f) contains more than 0.1 percent of foreign material; (g) contains two or more live or dead weevils or other insects, insect webbing, or insect refuse; or (h) is otherwise of distinctly low quality. | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 For the special grade Parboiled milled rice, see [§ 868.315(c)](/on/2024-09-20/title-7/section-868.315#p-868.315(c)). | | | | | |
| 2 For the special grade Undermilled milled rice, see [§ 868.315(d)](/on/2024-09-20/title-7/section-868.315#p-868.315(d)). | | | | | |
| 3 For the special grade Glutinous milled rice, see [§ 868.315(e)](/on/2024-09-20/title-7/section-868.315#p-868.315(e)). | | | | | |
| 4 Grades U.S. No. 1 to U.S. No. 4, inclusive, shall contain not more than 3.0 percent of heat-damaged kernels, kernels damaged by heat and/or parboiled kernels in nonparboiled rice. | | | | | |
| 5 Grades U.S. No. 1 to U.S. No. 4, inclusive, shall contain not more than 1.0 percent of material passing through a 30 sieve. | | | | | |

[[67 FR 61251](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/67-FR-61251), Sept. 30, 2002]
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 31.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 RULE 13A-14(A)

I, Michael L. Weiner, Chief Executive Officer of Biophan Technologies, Inc. (the
"registrant"), certify that:

1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Biophan Technologies,
Inc.;

2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4) The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5) The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: October 6, 2004

/s/Michael L. Weiner
-----------------------
Michael L. Weiner
Chief Executive Officer
§ 600.250 Council member training. ( a ) The Secretary shall provide a training course covering a variety of topics relevant to matters before the Councils and shall make the training course available to all Council members and staff and staff from NMFS regional offices and science centers. To the extent resources allow, the Secretary will make the training available to Council committee and advisory panel members.
( b ) Council members appointed after January 12, 2007, shall, within one year of appointment, complete the training course developed by the Secretary. Any Council member who completed such a training course within 24 months of January 12, 2007, is considered to have met the training requirement of this section.
[75 FR 59154, Sept. 27, 2010]
Lympho Effect lag Estimate StdErr DF tValue Probt IQR mean change 

UFP 0 -1.02990032 1.61602765 332 -0.63730365 0.52436631 0.3827 29.8 -1.32262CO 0 8.47873805 3.42901769 332 2.47264343 0.01391222 0.2 29.8 5.69042UFP 0 -0.10696637 1.77198854 332 -0.06036516 0.95190113 0.3827 29.8 -0.13736NO2 0 0.06452288 0.0628677 332 1.02632798 0.30548419 12.9 29.8 2.79310

Mono UFP 0 0.86125074 0.51750783 306 1.66422746 0.09709061 0.3827 3.6 9.15557

CO 0 0.58002745 1.17482304 306 0.49371473 0.62186183 0.2 3.6 3.22237UFP 2 2.0351348 0.60000033 305 3.3918895 0.00078567 0.3827 3.6 21.6346CO 2 -1.0416853 1.1271784 305 -0.924153 0.35613722 0.2 3.6 -5.78714UFP 0 1.11917169 0.54198203 306 2.0649609 0.0397688 0.3827 3.6 11.8974NO2 0 -0.01097856 0.02044179 306 -0.53706443 0.5916134 12.9 3.6 -3.93398UFP 2 2.9088149 0.68848255 305 4.22496535 3.1597E-05 0.3827 3.6 30.9223NO2 2 -0.05502098 0.02307512 305 -2.38442919 0.0177167 12.9 3.6 -19.7158

PLT ACP 0 -61.9726425 48.6784926 212 -1.2731011 0.20437643 0.9073 255.9 -21.972

EC 0 0.68413076 2.17935078 212 0.31391493 0.75389432 2 255.9 0.53468ACP 0 -27.2374803 46.2275016 212 -0.58920511 0.55635102 0.9073 255.9 -9.65711OC 0 -4.55609287 8.44803265 212 -0.53930815 0.59024018 0.5 255.9 -0.89020UFP 0 8.54373856 4.82279637 331 1.7715321 0.07739231 0.3827 255.9 1.27772NO2 0 -0.45584212 0.17208997 331 -2.64885928 0.00846356 12.9 255.9 -2.29791

seggran ACP 0 19.3188772 17.0379444 213 1.1338737 0.25812207 0.9073 60.7 28.87

EC 0 -2.07325226 0.79579702 213 -2.60525261 0.00982795 2 60.7 -6.83114ACP 0 -0.37061486 14.5629449 213 -0.02544917 0.97972052 0.9073 60.7 -0.55396OC 0 -4.88282681 3.03098764 213 -1.61096889 0.10866736 0.5 60.7 -4.02209UFP 0 0.53285085 1.66690639 333 0.31966453 0.74942311 0.3827 60.7 0.33595CO 0 -10.4613258 3.64510339 333 -2.86996683 0.00436756 0.2 60.7 -3.44689UFP 0 -0.09454357 1.80530933 333 -0.05236973 0.95826549 0.3827 60.7 -0.05960NO2 0 -0.11513717 0.06591588 333 -1.74672887 0.08160636 12.9 60.7 -2.44690

twopoll.xlsTabelle11 of 1
Successful Practices & Strategies 

Niagara Falls Police Department 

Vol. 4 | No. 2

Niagara Falls, New York

http://www.nfpolice.com

Community policing element

Community partnerships

Problem/issue 

Lack of attendance at public meetings

Problem description

Even though we publicized our monthly meetings in the local newspaper and via social media, we were 

unable to get good attendance.

Community policing strategies implemented

We created a program called "Kickin' It With the Cops" where we invite the community to come out and 

meet with police officials to discuss issues in a safe and nonthreatening environment. We hold a 

meeting once a month during the summer and cook hot dogs and have a bounce house for children to 

play in while their parents talk to members of the police department. It has been successful thus far. The 

location changes each time to a part of the city where there is normally a lot of both foot and vehicle 

traffic.

Change and/or impact as a result of these community policing efforts

Each successive session that we held over the summer was more successful than the one before. At one 

of the meetings we also invited an antique car club to come out and display vintage automobiles for kids 

and adults to view and ask questions about. 

The Niagara Falls Police Department saw an increase in community trust and willingness to 

communicate during and after the events. Many of the people that attended had never had a positive 

interaction with law enforcement before either as an adult or a child. The children present also got a 

sense of positive police interaction and a sense of being able to trust the police. 
Believe it or not, the majority of the issues we heard from citizens at the events were positive in nature. 

They described of a good interaction with an officer or how they were happy with services rendered. 

Other things we heard were quality-of-life issues such as a new garbage tote program the city had 

recently rolled out and road or paving problems. By answering their questions and concerns honestly 

and with concern, we believe we were able to build some trust and rapport with people who normally 

would not have come forward.

Lessons learned through program implementation

We learned that attendance and interest were higher if we were proactive and “went to the citizens” 

rather than asking them to come to us. It showed that we had a genuine interest and care for their 

opinions and complaints.

The opinions contained herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the 

U.S. Department of Justice. References to specific agencies, companies, products, or services should not be considered an 

endorsement by the author(s) or the U.S. Department of Justice. Rather, the references are illustrations to supplement 

discussion of the issues. 

The Internet references cited in this document were valid as of the date of publication. Given that URLs and websites are in 

constant flux, neither the author(s) nor the Office of Community Oriented Policing Services can vouch for their current validity. 

Published 2017
**Exhibit 23****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No.333-48313) of PS Business Parks, Inc. pertaining to the PS Business Parks, Inc. 1997 Stock Optionand Incentive Plan, the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-50274) of PS Business Parks,Inc. pertaining to the PS 401(k)/Profit Sharing Plan, the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No.333-104604) of PS Business Parks, Inc. pertaining to the PS Business Parks, Inc. 2003 Stock Optionand Incentive Plan, the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-129463) of PS Business Parks,Inc. pertaining to the PS Business Parks, Inc. Retirement Plan for Non-Employee Directors, theRegistration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-78627) and in the related prospectus, the RegistrationStatement on Form S-3 (No. 333-50463) and in the related prospectus, and the Registration Statementon Form S-3 (No. 333-112969) and the related prospectus, and the Registration Statement on Form S-3(No. 333-140972) and the related prospectus of our reports dated February 26, 2008 with respect tothe consolidated financial statements and related financial statement schedule of PS BusinessParks, Inc., and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of PS BusinessParks, Inc., included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007,filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.Los Angeles, California