alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 16-26516 Doc 4 Filed 08/18/16 Entered 08/18/16 09:51:40 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2
Case 16-26516 Doc 4 Filed 08/18/16 Entered 08/18/16 09:51:40 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-Q/A to the Quarterly Report of Integrated Environmental Technologies, Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, David R. LaVance, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)           the Report fully complies with the requirements of §13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, 15 U.S.C. §78m or 78o(d), and,





(2)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: August 15, 2011
By:
/s/ David R. LaVanceDavid R. LaVancePresident and Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 187 (Wednesday, September 27, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 56582]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-8308]



[[Page 56582]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Termination of Review of Noise Compatibility Program for Fresno 
Yosemite International Airport, Fresno, CA

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

ACTION:  Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) announces it has 
terminated its review of the noise compatibility program, at the 
request of the city of Fresno, owner and operator of Fresno Yosemite 
International Airport, under the provisions of 49 U.S.C. 47501 et. seq. 
(the Aviation Safety and Noise Abatement Act, hereinafter referred to 
as ``the Act'') and 14 CFR part 150.

DATES: Effective Date: The effective date of the FAA's termination of 
its review of the Fresno Yosemite International Airport Noise 
Compatibility Program is September 15, 2006.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Camille Garibaldi, Environmental 
Protection Specialist, San Francisco Airports District Office, Airports 
Division, Western-Pacific Region, Federal Aviation Administration, 831 
Mitten Road, Burlingame, California, 94010. Telephone: 650/876-2778, 
extension 613.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On July 6, 2005 (70 FR 50437-50438), the FAA 
determined that the noise exposure maps submitted by the City of Fresno 
were in compliance with applicable requirements under 14 CFR part 150. 
Subsequently, the City of Fresno submitted its noise compatibility 
program for the subject airport to the FAA for formal FAA review that 
began on May 26, 2006 (71 FR 33032-33033). In a letter received by FAA 
on September 15, 2006, the City of Fresno requested that FAA suspend 
its review and processing of the noise compatibility program in order 
to modify the document. When the FAA has received the revised 
documentation, FAA will reissue appropriate notice establishing new 
review and approval periods in accordance with section 150.33(e) of 14 
CFR part 150.
    Questions may be directed to the individual named above under the 
heading: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

    Issued in Hawthorne, California on September 15, 2006.
Mark A. McClardy,
Manager, Airports Division, Western-Pacific Region, AWP-600.
[FR Doc. 06-8308 Filed 9-26-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
Case 16-81736 Doc 1 Filed 07/21/16 Entered 07/21/16 13:40:32 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 10
Case 16-81736 Doc 1 Filed 07/21/16 Entered 07/21/16 13:40:32 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 10
Case 16-81736 Doc 1 Filed 07/21/16 Entered 07/21/16 13:40:32 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 10
Case 16-81736 Doc 1 Filed 07/21/16 Entered 07/21/16 13:40:32 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 10
Case 16-81736 Doc 1 Filed 07/21/16 Entered 07/21/16 13:40:32 Desc Main

 Document Page 5 of 10
Case 16-81736 Doc 1 Filed 07/21/16 Entered 07/21/16 13:40:32 Desc Main

 Document Page 6 of 10
Case 16-81736 Doc 1 Filed 07/21/16 Entered 07/21/16 13:40:32 Desc Main

 Document Page 7 of 10
Case 16-81736 Doc 1 Filed 07/21/16 Entered 07/21/16 13:40:32 Desc Main

 Document Page 8 of 10
Case 16-81736 Doc 1 Filed 07/21/16 Entered 07/21/16 13:40:32 Desc Main

 Document Page 9 of 10
Case 16-81736 Doc 1 Filed 07/21/16 Entered 07/21/16 13:40:32 Desc Main

 Document Page 10 of 10
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

Under the authority granted to me as Chief Counsel of the Internal Revenue Service by the General Counsel of the Department of the Treasury by General Counsel Order No. 21 (Rev. 4), pursuant to the Civil Service Reform Act, I have appointed the following persons to the Legal Division Performance Review Board, Internal Revenue Service Panel:

1. Chairperson, Harry J. Hicks, International Tax Counsel (Department of the Treasury).

2. Kevin Brown, Commissioner, Small Business/Self-Employed (Internal Revenue Service).

3. Michael Desmond, Deputy, Tax Legislative Counsel (Department of the Treasury).

This publication is required by 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4).

Dated: September 20, 2006.

Donald L. Korb,

Chief Counsel, Internal Revenue Service.

[FR Doc. 06-8324  Filed 9-27-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-M
March 28 , 2012

Mr, Randall Fiertz

Director Office of Airport Compliance and Management Analysis, ACO

- 1

Federal Aviation Administration Orville Wright Building 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20591

Re: FAA Docket 2006

- 25867 Chicago Midway International Airport, Airport Privatization Pilot Program

Dear Mr. Fiertz:

I am writing to provide further information about the current status of the City of Chicago’s (the “City”) proposed transferring of operations of Chicago Midway International Airport (the “Airport”) pursuant to the Airport Privatization Pilot Program (the “Pilot Program”) and specifically to supplement my letter of September 26, 2011, on behalf of the City, req uesting an extension of time. The City will require a further extension of time to December 31, 2012, to

submit its revised preliminary application relating to the Airport under the Pilot Program.

It is the intent of the City to submit to the Federal Av iation Administration (“FAA”) updated information pertaining to the City’s Preliminary Application pursuant to the application procedures relating to the Pilot Program set forth in the Federal Register. This information will include at a minimum, an update d statement of the City’s authority to lease the Airport with a citation to legal authority, a reasonable and realistic timetable for transferring the Airport and

will be submitted by December 31, 2012, at which time, if the City moves forward, the City wi ll have released a request for qualifications (”RFQ”) relating to the Airport’s participation in the Pilot Program.

If the updated information is not submitted by the City to the FAA by December 31, 2012, the City acknowledges that the FAA will consider the City’s application to be officially withdrawn and that the FAA will in fact withdraw the Airport’s slot, and close Docket 2006

- 25867. The City understands that

, should the FAA receive and accept any preliminary applications for the large hub airpor t slot under the Pilot Program , the FAA will place the accepted preliminary applications on a standby list in the order received. The City further understands that the FAA will evaluate the City’s application and any preliminary applications for the large hub airport slot on the standby list and select the most qualified applicant capable of completing the requirements of the Pilot Program in a timely manner.As before, please let me know if the City can provide any additional information that would be

helpful to you in considering the City’s request.

Lois A. Scott,

Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 32.2

                         GLOBAL BEVERAGE SOLUTIONS, INC.
                  FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2006
                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Bryce Knight, certify that

1.   I am the Chief Financial Officer of Global Beverage Solutions, Inc.

2.   Attached to this certification is Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,
     2006, a periodic report (the "periodic report") filed by the issuer with
     the Securities Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
     the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"), which
     contains financial statements.

3.   I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
     to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that

     o    The periodic report containing the financial statements fully complies
          with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act,
          and

     o    The information in the periodic report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the issuer for the periods presented.


August 9, 2006                               /s/ Bryce Knight
                                             ----------------------------
                                             Bryce Knight
                                             Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by Global Beverage Solutions, Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

This certification will not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that
section. This certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference
into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 even if the document with which it is submitted to the Securities and
Exchange Commission is so incorporated by reference.
Street Address: 

950 West Basin Road 

New Casrle, DE 19720 

Moiling Address: 

p.o. Box 15505 

Wilmington, DE 19850 

(302) 324-2500 

(BOO) 235-9100 

Fax Numbers: 

Accounting: 314-2554 

Circulation; 324-2945 

Classified: 324-5511 

HmlCIl Resoorces: 324-2578 

Info Systems: 324-2969 

Marketing; 324-2557 

News: 324-5509 

Retail: 324-5518 

Legal Desk 302-324-2676 

Legal Fax 302-324-2249 

AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION 

State of Delaware 

Personally appeared before me this 3rd day of May, 2010. 

I, Kristin Segner, of The News Journal Company, a daily newspaper printed and published 

in the County of New Castle County, State of Delaware, who, being Quly sworn states that 

the advertisement of SID DNREC Air Quality Management - LEGAL NOTICE-PUBLIC 

HEARING 6/2/2010 

was published in The News Journal on May 2, 2010 

Legal Coordinator 

Title 

Sworn to before me this 3rd day of May, 2010 

Notary Public 

Wanda James · 

Notary Public 

State of Delaware 

Commission expires 11/02/2012 

,' • .. --:::- ,>~,\,' .. -. • '~ ~ \" ; " .... ~ 

-----
B EFOF^ THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

In the Matter of: 

James C. Thomas, III MUR 6920 

I 

SECOND CONSENT TO EXTEND TIME 

TO INSTITUTE A CIVIL ENFORCEMENT ACTION 

I 

As consideration fo|r the Federal Election Commission's agreement to extend 

Respondent's period to reply to the General Counsel's Brief, the captioned party hereby consents 

I 

to toll the statute of limitations for any civil enforcement action that the Federal Election 

I 

Commission might institutb in connection with MUR 6920, pursuant to 52 U.S.C. § 30109(a)(6), 

for twenty (20) calendar days. 

i 

This agreement thereby extends the time to institute a civil law enforcement action to 

I 

eighty (80) calendar days from the expiration of the five-year statute of limitations found at 28 

I 

U.S.C. § 2462 or of any other statutes of limitations or repose that may be applicable. 

Any further extensions of the time to institute a civil enforcement action will require the 

i 

written consent of the Respondent. 

Dated: fo/! Q/H 

^r/Langhofer, Counsel to James C. Thomas, III
Editorial Note on Part 300
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 300 appear at 64 FR 44431, Aug. 16, 1999, and at 76 FR 59305, Sept. 26, 2011.

§ 300.300 Purpose and scope. ( a ) This subpart implements internationally-adopted measures pertaining to foreign vessels determined to have engaged in illegal, unreported, and unregulated (IUU) fishing and placed on IUU vessel lists of the: ( 1 ) International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT),
( 2 ) Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (CCAMLR),
( 3 ) Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organization (NAFO),
( 4 ) Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission (WCPFC),
( 5 ) Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission (IATTC), and
( 6 ) Parties to the Agreement on the International Dolphin Conservation Program (AIDCP).
( b ) For purposes of this subpart, the above organizations are referred to as regional fishery management organizations (RFMOs). Each of these RFMOs adopts or approves an IUU vessel list in accordance with their respective rules and procedures. The lists are publicly available at each RFMO's Web site. The regulations in this subpart apply to all persons subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, wherever they are.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Biophan Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended May 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert
J. Wood, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my
knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/Robert J. Wood
-------------------
Robert J. Wood
Chief Financial Officer
July 15, 2004
Your session is about to expire.Resume session

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Welcome.Log inorregisterCOPS OFFICE RESOURCE CENTER

HomeCatalogCartOrders

                    

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                CatalogMatches: 1Offline form Recent Popular Online Print OtherCOPS-P157Community Policing DefinedCommunity Policing Defined provides a detailed description of the elements and subelements that fall under the community policing philosophy. The document describes the range of collaborative partnerships that exist between policing agencies and the individuals and organizations they serve. It outlines the process of how they go about engaging in the proactive and systematic examination of identified problems to develop effective responses, and it illustrates how they align their organizational management, structure, personnel, and information systems to support community partnerships and proactive problem-solving.By Office of Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS Office)Categories: Foundations of Community Policing • Police OperationsLanguage: EnglishPublic linkhttps://portal.cops.usdoj.gov/resourcecenter?item=cops-p157Click here to see the entire catalog.Cart:Download PDFBook • Oct 2012Search catalogreset title abstract authors contentContaining text: exact phraseNot containing text: exact phraseLanguage:anyEnglishSpanishHmongVietnameseCategory:anyAlternatives to IncarcerationCommunity PartnershipsData and AnalysisEthics and IntegrityFoundations of Community PolicingHiring, Recruitment, and RetentionHomeland SecurityNew Immigrant CommunitiesNonviolent CrimeOtherPolice OperationsPOP Center ResourceSchool and Campus SafetyTechnologyTribalViolent CrimeYouth SafetyPublished after:Published before:Page1

                    

FOIA | No FEAR Act | Open Government | Privacy | Legal|HelpCopyright (C) U.S. Department of Justice, COPS Office, IT Division, 2012 - 2024. All rights reserved.
Rendered on Mon Mar 4 2024 at 05:53 (UTC-5) in 0.20 secEnterprise Framework 3.21.7.7 • Store Controls 3.3.1.7Survey 500303407 Section 60000560 Rules Hints Inactive
Order filed September 12, 2013.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-13-00772-CV

____________

IN RE THERESA HAYNES, Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

127th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2012-00088

ORDER

On September 4, 2013, relator, Theresa Haynes, filed a pro se petition for 

writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code § 22.221; see also Tex. R. 

App. P. 52. Theresa Haynes makes multiple requests for relief, including that we: 

(1) vacate the order of the Honorable R.K. Sandill, judge of the 127th District 

Court, Harris County, dismissing her litigation in cause number 2012-00088; 

(2) vacate the order of the Honorable Mike Engelhart, judge of the 151st District 

Court, Harris County, dismissing her bill of review in cause number 2013-25413; 

(3) vacate the order of the Honorable Jerry Sandel, judge of the 284th District 
Court, Montgomery County, adjudging her a vexatious litigant in cause number 

04-02-01229-CV; and (4) award her $10 million in damages against the judges 

involved in these actions because they allegedly defamed her by referring to her as 

a vexatious litigant.

Under section 11.101 of the Civil Practice and Remedies Code, a court may 

enter an order prohibiting a person from filing, pro se, a new litigation without the 

permission of the local administrative judge if the court finds after notice and 

hearing that the person is a vexatious litigant. The order adjudging Theresa Haynes 

a vexatious litigant makes her subject to this prefiling requirement. It specifically 

requires her to “obtain the permission of the Local Administrative Judge before 

filing any other lawsuit in the State of Texas.”

Under section 11.103(a), the clerk of this court “may not file . . . [an] 

original proceeding . . . presented, pro se, by a vexatious litigant subject to a 

prefiling order under Section 11.101 unless the litigant obtains an order from the 

appropriate local administrative judge . . . permitting the filing.” See Tex. Civ. 

Prac. & Rem. Code § 11.103(a). Theresa Haynes asserts in her petition for writ of 

mandamus that Judge Sandill permitted the filing of this original proceeding, but

Judge Sandill is not the local administrative judge for Harris County. This court 

will therefore consider dismissal of this petition unless Theresa Haynes, within 10 

days of the date of this order, shows that she has obtained an order from the local 

administrative judge permitting the filing of this original proceeding. Theresa 

Hayne is further instructed that, should she submit proof of permission to file this 

original proceeding, she must file with this court “a certified or sworn copy of 

every document that is material to [her] claim for relief,” including the purported 

order from Judge Sandill dismissing her litigation. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.7(a)(1).

PER CURIAM
# EUR-Lex - 12004V104 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V104

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART II — THE CHARTER OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THE UNION - TITLE V — CITIZENS' RIGHTS - Article II-104 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0051 - 0051 *

Article II-104

Right to petition

Any citizen of the Union and any natural or legal person residing or having its registered office in a Member State has the right to petition the European Parliament.

--------------------------------------------------
# EUR-Lex - 11997E253 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11997E253

**Treaty establishing the European Community (Amsterdam consolidated version) - Part Five: Institutions of the Community - Title I: Provisions governing the institutions - Chapter 2: Provisions common to several institutions - Article 253 - Article 190 - EC Treaty (Maastricht consolidated version) - Article 190 - EEC Treaty **

*
Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0281 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0067 - Consolidated version (EEC Treaty - no official publication available) *

Treaty establishing the European Community (Amsterdam consolidated version)

Article 253

Regulations, directives and decisions adopted jointly by the European Parliament and the Council, and such acts adopted by the Council or the Commission, shall state the reasons on which they are based and shall refer to any proposals or opinions which were required to be obtained pursuant to this Treaty.
# EUR-Lex - 12004V123 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V123

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART III — THE POLICIES AND FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - TITLE II — NON-DISCRIMINATION AND CITIZENSHIP - Article III-123 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0056 - 0056 *

Article III-123

European laws or framework laws may lay down rules to prohibit discrimination on grounds of nationality as referred to in Article I-4(2).

--------------------------------------------------