alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 19 (Monday, January 30, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 4894]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-823]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Notice of Madison-Beaverhead Advisory Committee Meeting

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the authorities in the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (Pub. L. 92-463) and the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-
Determination Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 106-393), the Beaverhead-Deerlodge 
National Forest's Madison-Beaverhead Resource Advisory Committee will 
meet on Tuesday, February 14, 2006, from 10 a.m. until 4 p.m. in 
Dillon, Montana, for a business meeting. The meeting is open to the 
public.

DATES: Tuesday, February 14, 2006.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the USDA Service Center, at 420 
Barrett Street, Dillon, MT 59725.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bruce Ramsey, Designated Forest 
Official (DFO), Forest Supervisor, Beaverhead-Deerlodge National 
Forest, at (406) 684-3973.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Agenda topics for these meetings include 
hearing proposal for projects to fund under Title II of Pub. L. 106-
393, hearing public comments, and other business. If the meeting 
location changes, notice will be posted in local newspapers, including 
the Dillon Tribune and The Montana Standard.

    Dated: January 23, 2006.
Bruce Ramsey,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 06-823 Filed 1-27-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
Editorial Note on Part 300
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 300 appear at 64 FR 44431, Aug. 16, 1999, and at 76 FR 59305, Sept. 26, 2011.

§ 300.121 Definitions. In addition to the terms defined in § 300.2, the Magnuson-Stevens Act, and § 600.10 of this title, and in the Treaty, the terms used in this subpart have the following meanings. If a term is defined differently in § 300.2, the Magnuson-Stevens Act, or the Treaty, the definition in this section shall apply. *Conch* means *Strombus gigas.*
*Factory vessel* means a vessel that processes, transforms, or packages aquatic biological resources on board.
*Lobster* means one or both of the following: ( 1 ) Smoothtail lobster, *Panulirus laevicauda.*
( 2 ) Caribbean spiny lobster or spiny lobster, *Panulirus argus.*
*Regional Administrator* means the Administrator of the Southeast Region, or a designee.
*Science and Research Director* means the Director, Southeast Fisheries Science Center.
*Treaty waters* means the waters of one or more of the following: ( 1 ) *Quita Sueno,* enclosed by latitudes 13°55′ N. and 14°43′ N. between longitudes 80°55′ W. and 81°28′ W.
( 2 ) *Serrana,* enclosed by arcs 12 nautical miles from the low water line of the cays and islands in the general area of 14°22′ N. lat., 80°20′ W. long.
( 3 ) *Roncador,* enclosed by arcs 12 nautical miles from the low water line of Roncador Cay, in approximate position 13°35′ N. lat., 80°05′ W. long.
[61 FR 35550, July 5, 1996, as amended at 76 FR 59305, Sept. 26, 2011]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent

v. LUIS COLON, Petitioner : : : : : : : : : : : No. 550 EAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 11th day of February, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED
.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       6,907,708
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               45,710,532
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,424,301
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            54,675,334
<PP&E>                                   1,156,424,160
<DEPRECIATION>                             187,612,047
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           1,034,602,531
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       63,717,103
<BONDS>                                    636,698,984
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        18,655
<OTHER-SE>                                 223,603,681
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             1,034,602,531
<SALES>                                    227,312,833
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           233,704,886
<CGS>                                       88,402,012
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               95,778,797
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          31,204,621
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             18,319,456
<INCOME-TAX>                                 6,979,713
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         11,339,743
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                11,339,743
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.66
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.64


</TABLE>
888 Seventeenth Street, NW, Suite 700

Washington, DC 20006-3309

Phone 202.298.8660

Fax 202.342.0683

www.zsrlaw.com

DAVID M. ENDERSBEE DIRECT DIAL (202) 973-7935

dmendersbee@zsrlaw.com

Zuckert, Scoutt & Rasenberger, L.L.P.

February 24, 2015

BY ELECTRONIC MAIL

Robert Finamore

Chief, Foreign Air Carrier Licensing Division

U.S. Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.W.

Washington, D.C. 20590

Re: Oceanair Linhas Aéreas S.A. (Docket DOT-OST-2015-0027)

Dear Mr. Finamore:

On February 13, 2015, Oceanair Linhas Aéreas S.A. (“Oceanair”) filed in the abovereferenced docket an (i) Application for an Exemption and Foreign Air Carrier Permit, and (ii) a 

Motion for Confidential Treatment. 

Oceanair has completed polling and no carrier objected to the grant of its application or

motion. Oceanair respectfully requests that the Department promptly grant the authority and 

relief requested therein. 

Respectfully submitted,

David M. Endersbee

Counsel for Oceanair Linhas Aéreas S.A.

cc: Service List
#### §§ 253.32-253.49 [Reserved]
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 21 (Wednesday, February 1, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 5339]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-795]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

[Report No. 2751]


Petitions for Reconsideration of Action in Rulemaking Proceeding

January 23, 2006.
    Petitions for Reconsideration have been filed in the Commission's 
Rulemaking proceeding listed in this Public Notice and published 
pursuant to 47 CFR 1.429(e). The full text of these documents is 
available for viewing and copying in Room CY-B402, 445 12th Street, 
SW., Washington, DC or may be purchased from the Commission's copy 
contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc. (BCPI) (1-800-378-3160). 
Oppositions to these petitions must be filed by February 16, 2006. See 
Sec.  1.4(b)(1) of the Commission's rules (47 CFR 1.4(b)(1)). Replies 
to an opposition must be filed within 10 days after the time for filing 
oppositions have expired.
    Subject: In the Matter of Amendment of Section 73.202(b), Table of 
Allotments, FM Broadcast Stations (Connersville, Madison, and Richmond, 
Indiana, Erlanger and Lebanon, Kentucky, and Norwood, Ohio; and 
Lebanon, Lebanon Junction, New Haven, and Springfield, Kentucky) (MB 
Docket No. 05-17).
    Number of Petitions Filed: 1.
    Subject: In the Matter of Amendment of Section 73.202(b), Table of 
Allotments, FM Broadcast Stations (Lake City, Chattanooga, Harrogate, 
and Halls Crossroads, Tennessee) (MB Docket No. 03-120).
    Number of Petitions Filed: 1.

Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 06-795 Filed 1-31-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

In Re: ) BK No.:

)

) Chapter:

)

)

)

Debtor(s) )

Julio C. Carrion

16-24884

13

Eastern Division

Honorable A. Benjamin Goldgar

Order Confirming Plan

 The plan under Chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy code, filed as docket No. 15, having been found

by the Court to comply with the provisions of the 11 U.S.C. section 1325, THE PLAN IS HEREBY

CONFIRMED.

All property of the estate, as specified by the 11 U.S.C. section 541 and 1306, will continue to be

property of the estate following confirmation, unless (1) the plan provides for surrender of the property,

or (2) the property is sold pursuant to the plan or court order.

Honorable A. Benjamin Goldgar

Enter:

Dated: October 28, 2016 United States Bankruptcy Judge

Case 16-24884 Doc 19 Filed 10/28/16 Entered 11/02/16 11:17:57 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 1
# EUR-Lex - 11957A206 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11957A206

**TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN ATOMIC ENERGY COMMUNITY ( E.A.E.C. - EURATOM ), TITLE FIVE - GENERAL PROVISIONS, ARTICLE 206 **

*

*

++++

ARTICLE 206

THE COMMUNITY MAY CONCLUDE WITH A THIRD STATE , A UNION OF STATES OR AN INTERNATIONAL ORGANISATION AGREEMENTS ESTABLISHING AN ASSOCIATION INVOLVING RECIPROCAL RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS , COMMON ACTION AND SPECIAL PROCEDURES .

THESE AGREEMENTS SHALL BE CONCLUDED BY THE COUNCIL , ACTING UNANIMOUSLY AFTER CONSULTING THE ASSEMBLY .

WHERE SUCH AGREEMENTS CALL FOR AMENDMENTS TO THIS TREATY , THESE AMENDMENTS SHALL FIRST BE ADOPTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROCEDURE LAID DOWN IN ARTICLE 204 .
# EUR-Lex - 12004V181 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V181

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART III — THE POLICIES AND FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - TITLE III — INTERNAL POLICIES AND ACTION - CHAPTER II — ECONOMIC AND MONETARY POLICY - Section 1 — Economic policy - Article III-181 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0078 - 0078 *

Article III-181

1. Overdraft facilities or any other type of credit facility with the European Central Bank or with the central banks of the Member States (hereinafter referred to as "national central banks") in favour of Union institutions, bodies, offices or agencies, central governments, regional, local or other public authorities, other bodies governed by public law, or public undertakings of Member States shall be prohibited, as shall the purchase directly from them by the European Central Bank or national central banks of debt instruments.

2. Paragraph 1 shall not apply to publicly owned credit institutions which, in the context of the supply of reserves by central banks, shall be given the same treatment by national central banks and the European Central Bank as private credit institutions.

--------------------------------------------------
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, December 19, 2019. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, December 19, 2019 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A20I0128. PHILLIP H. TAYLOR, JR. v. AMERIS BANK.
Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of State Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 19SV347
§ 230.7 Salvage of stinkers. ( a ) Any person salvaging a stinker shall submit to the Assistant Administrator or his/her representative an oral or written report describing the circumstances of the salvage within 12 hours of such salvage. He/she shall provide promptly to the Assistant Administrator or his/her representative each harpoon, lance, or explosive dart found in or attached to the stinker. The device shall be returned to the owner thereof promptly, unless it is retained as evidence of a possible violation.
( b ) There shall be a rebuttable presumption that a stinker has been struck by the captain whose mark appears on the harpoon, lance, or explosive dart found in or attached thereto, and, if no strike has been reported by such captain, such strike shall be deemed to have occurred at the time of recovery of the device.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                        JAN-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                                           MAY-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                             JUL-31-2000
<CASH>                                                         3,956
<SECURITIES>                                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                 34,630
<ALLOWANCES>                                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                              38,586
<PP&E>                                                             0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                     0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                             3,510,603
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                        918,438
<BONDS>                                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                              0
<PREFERRED>                                                        0
<COMMON>                                                      19,790
<OTHER-SE>                                                 2,572,375
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                               3,510,603
<SALES>                                                            0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                               7,017
<CGS>                                                              0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                214,433
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                              1,638)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                            (205,778)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                        (205,778)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                    0
<CHANGES>                                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                               (205,778)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                  (.01)



</TABLE>
Exhibit 31

RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATIONS

I, Richard G. Hunter, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Food Technology
Service, Inc. (the "Company").

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statement made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects,
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The Company's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15d-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:

     (a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its
consolidates subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

     (b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and
procedures, and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     (c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the Company's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company's fourth
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.   The Company's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
Company's auditors and the audit committee of Company's board of directors (or
persons performing the equivalent functions):

      (a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and

      (b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal control
over financial reporting.

Date:  March 30, 2007

By:  /s/ Richard G. Hunter, Ph.D.
Chief Executive and Financial Officer
§ 221.35 What are the requirements for motions? ( a ) *General.* Any party may apply for an order or ruling on any matter related to the hearing process by presenting a motion to the ALJ. A motion may be presented any time after the Department of Commerce's designated ALJ office issues a docketing notice under § 221.30. ( 1 ) A motion made at a hearing may be stated orally on the record, unless the ALJ directs that it be reduced to writing.
( 2 ) Any other motion must: ( i ) Be in writing;
( ii ) Comply with the requirements of this subpart with respect to form, content, filing, and service; and
( iii ) Not exceed 15 pages, including all supporting arguments.
( b ) *Content.* ( 1 ) Each motion must state clearly and concisely: ( i ) Its purpose and the relief sought;
( ii ) The facts constituting the grounds for the relief sought; and
( iii ) Any applicable statutory or regulatory authority.
( 2 ) A proposed order must accompany the motion.
( c ) *Response.* Except as otherwise required by this part, any other party may file a response to a written motion within 10 days after service of the motion. The response may not exceed 15 pages, including all supporting arguments. When a party presents a motion at a hearing, any other party may present a response orally on the record.
( d ) *Reply.* Unless the ALJ orders otherwise, no reply to a response may be filed.
( e ) *Effect of filing.* Unless the ALJ orders otherwise, the filing of a motion does not stay the hearing process.
( f ) *Ruling.* The ALJ will rule on the motion as soon as practicable, either orally on the record or in writing. He or she may summarily deny any dilatory, repetitive, or frivolous motion.
Hillsborough,

No. 4819.

#### Angus M. MacNeil *v.*Jean Lathe, *Justice of the Municipal Court of Brookline & a.*

Argued February 1, 1960.

Decided February 29, 1960.

*443
      *Angus M. MacNeil*(by brief and orally), *pro se.*

*Edward F. Smith*and *James M. Riley, Jr. {Mr. Smith*orally), for defendant Lathe.

Lampron, J.

Defendant first argues that the “Findings, Rulings and Decree,” of the Court were premature. We agree with this contention.

“As a general rule, notice and an opportunity to be heard are basic essentials of a judicial proceeding . . . The requirement of notice and hearing need not be observed in matters which are formal, clerical or uncontested . . . and special circumstances may demand the issuance of court orders without initial notice or hearing as in the case of injunctions ... As a matter of practice notice and hearing represent the general rule and the denial of a hearing is the exception.” *DiPietro*v. *Lavigne,*98 N. H. 294, 295; *In re Poulin,*100 N. H. 458, 459.

It is true that a motion was properly disposed of on the allegations thereof when that “form of proceeding was accepted by both parties without objection.” *Kusky*v. *Laderbush,*96 N. H. 286; *Rosenblum*v. *Company,*99 N. H. 267, 270. It was also proper to decide a claim in a receivership on the statements of counsel without the offer of testimony when that form of proceeding was accepted by the parties. *Wein*v. *Arlen’s,*98 N. H. 487, 489. However there was no such agreement in this case. The defendant did not agree to plaintiff’s pleadings, there was no agreed statement of facts, nor was any testimony offered. There is nothing in the record to indicate that defendant waived her right to a hearing. On the contrary the record shows that defendant insisted on all her rights.

Even RSA 597:33 on which the Trial Court relies in its decree for taking jurisdiction of plaintiff’s petition states that “The *444superior court may render judgment . . . after hearing.” The Trial Court’s decree is set aside because it was made without the hearing to which the defendant Lathe was entitled. *DiPietro*v. *Lavigne, supra.*In view of this result it is unnecessary to decide whether RSA 597:33 confers jurisdiction on the Superior Court in this case or whether MacNeil was subject to arrest.

Plaintiff’s claim that the municipal court of Concord was without jurisdiction to set bail in a case returnable to the municipal court of Brookline was transferred by the Trial Court without ruling.

RSA 597:5 provides that “Every court and justice may require a person accused of an offense in which he is authorized to receive bail to recognize, with sureties, to appear at a future time before himself or any other competent tribunal.” The offenses with which plaintiff was charged were not within the offenses described by RSA 597:4 which are bailable by the Superior Court only. The municipal court of Concord therefore had jurisdiction to set bail in this case and this is especially so when, as here, it is done at the demand of and without objection from the plaintiff.

*Decree vacated; remanded.*

All concurred.