alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32

Certificate Pursuant to

             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
             as Adopted Pursuant to
        Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of NetWolves  Corporation  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending December 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Walter M. Groteke, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board,
certify,  pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  906  of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.

Date: February 14, 2005
                                        /s/ Walter M. Groteke
                                        --------------------------------
                                        Walter M. Groteke
                                        Chairman of the Board, President
                                        and Chief Executive Officer





            Certificate Pursuant to

             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
             as Adopted Pursuant to
        Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of NetWolves  Corporation  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending December 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Peter C. Castle,  Secretary and  Treasurer,  Chief  Financial  Officer and Chief
Accounting  Officer of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  1350,  as
adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.

Date: February 14, 2005
                                        /s/ Peter C. Castle
                                        -------------------------------
                                        Peter C. Castle
                                        Secretary and Treasurer
                                        Chief Financial Officer and
                                        Chief Accounting Officer
#### § 665.399 Area restrictions.

Anchoring by all fishing vessels over 50 ft (15.25 m) LOA is prohibited in the U.S. EEZ seaward of Guam west of 144°30′ E. long. except in the event of an emergency caused by ocean conditions or by a vessel malfunction that can be documented.
§ 665.625 Prohibitions. In addition to the general prohibitions specified in § 600.725 of this chapter and § 665.15, it is unlawful for any person to do any of the following: ( a ) [Reserved]
( b ) Fish for, take, or retain any PRIA coral reef ecosystem MUS species: ( 1 ) That is determined overfished with subsequent rulemaking by the Regional Administrator.
( 2 ) By means of gear or methods prohibited under § 665.627.
( 3 ) [Reserved]
( 4 ) In violation of any permit issued under §§ 665.13 or 665.624.
( c ) Fish for, take, or retain any wild live rock or live hard coral except under a valid special permit for scientific research, aquaculture seed stock collection or traditional and ceremonial purposes by indigenous people.
[75 FR 2205, Jan. 14, 2010, as amended at 78 FR 33003, June 3, 2013]
No. 11-197.

#### French et al. *v.*Allstate Indemnity Co.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT32

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18U.S.C. SECTION1350,

ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

       In connection with the Quarterly Report of Integrated EnvironmentalTechnologies, Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period endedMarch 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the "Report"), I, William E. Prince, President and ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

> 
(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

> 
(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

/S/WilliamE. Prince

WilliamE. Prince

Presidentand Chief Executive Officer

May 14,2004
Argued and submitted January 24,

reversed and remanded for reconsideration February 16, 1994

#### In the Matter of the Compensation of Lee S. Fellabaum, Claimant. Lee S. FELLABAUM, Petitioner, *v.*HORIZON AIRLINES, INC., and Employers Insurance of Wausau, *Respondents.*

(WCB 91-09116; CA A78681)

867 P2d 570

Kevin Keaney argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Pozzi, Wilson, Atchison, O’Leary & Conboy.

David O. Horne argued the cause and filed the brief for respondents.

Before Deits, Presiding Judge, and Warren and Riggs, Judges.

PER CURIAM

Reversed and remanded for reconsideration. *Gallino v. Courtesy Pontiac-Buick-GMC,*124 Or App 538, 863 P2d 530 (1993).
N. Y. COMMON PLEAS.

#### Adam Weber, respondent, agt. Horatio N. Ferris and others, appellants.

Where defendants indemnify the sheriff and direct him to go on and sell property in possession of and claimed by the plaintiff as owner, he being in fact the owner, they will be held liable as original trespassers, notwithstanding the proceeds of the sale was applied to an execution levied prior to that of the defendants.

*General*Term, January, 1868.

*Before*Daly, Brady *and*Barrett, *Judges.*

The defendants had judgment and execution against the plaintiff’s vendor, upon which they indemnified the sheriff,' who thereupon sold out all of the plaintiffs property, and applied a part of the proceeds to a prior execution under which a formal levy-had been made.

The referee found as a fact that the plaintiffs purchase from the defendant in the execution was *Iona fide*and that he was the owner of the property seized and sold.

S. B. Cushing, *for appellant.*

Chas. Frazer, *for respondent.*

*By the court,*Barrett, J.

This appeal presents no questions of law and, after a careful review of the case, we find ample evidence to sustain the referee’s findings of fact.

The defendants as indemnitors and directors of the sheriff are liable as original trespassers *(Herring agt. Hoppock,*15 *N. Y. R.,*409; *Fonda*agt. *Van Horne,*15 *Wend.,*631; *Davis*agt. *Newkirk,*5 *Den.,*92; *Root*agt. *Chandler,*10 *Wend.,*110; *Allen*agt. *Crary,*10 *Wend.,*349). There is nothing in the point that the goods had been previously levied upon under a prior execution. That was a mere formal and technical levy which the officer would not have pressed without *103an indemnity. It was made in the ordinary routine of duty, without instructions from the plaintiff in the execution. The seizure and salle of the goods and their consequent loss to the plaintiff resulted from the special instructions and indemnity given, upon their execution, by the present defendants. The application of the proceeds of the trespass was immaterial and the fact that they went to satisfy the first execution did not tend to mitigate the damages. The trespass consisted in the seizure of all the property, and the defendants, as directors and indemnitors, are liable for its full value. If they were unwilling to assume so great a responsibility, the particular part of the property upon which a levy was to be risked should have been pointed out-and separated.

The judgment should be affirmed.
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER REQUIRED BY RULE 13A-14(a)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Lighting Science Group Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report; and3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report.
 Date:
May 19, 2009
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Kathryn Reynolds WallbrinkName:
    
    Kathryn Reynolds WallbrinkTitle:
    
    Senior Vice President, Strategy and Finance(Principal Financial Officer)
#### § 1004.12 Traffic control devices.

Failure to comply with the directions of a traffic control device is prohibited unless otherwise directed by the Executive Director.
Editorial Note on Part 648
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 648 appear at 62 FR 14651, Mar. 27, 1997.

§ 648.77 Cage identification. Except as provided in § 648.78, the following cage identification requirements apply to all vessels issued a Federal fishing permit for surfclams and ocean quahogs: ( a ) *Tagging.* Before offloading, all cages that contain surfclams or ocean quahogs must be tagged with tags acquired annually under provisions of paragraph (b) of this section. A tag must be fixed on or as near as possible to the upper crossbar of the cage. A tag is required for every 60 ft3 (1,700 L) of cage volume, or portion thereof. A tag or tags must not be removed until the cage is emptied by the processor, at which time the processor must promptly remove and retain the tag(s) for 60 days beyond the end of the calendar year, unless otherwise directed by authorized law enforcement agents.
( b ) *Issuance.* The Regional Administrator will issue a supply of tags to each individual allocation owner qualifying for an allocation under § 648.74 prior to the beginning of each fishing year, or he/she may specify, in the Federal Register, a vendor from whom the tags shall be purchased. The number of tags will be based on the owner's initial allocation as specified in § 648.74(a). Each tag represents 32 bu (1,700 L) of allocation.
( c ) *Expiration.* Tags will expire at the end of the fishing year for which they are issued, or if rendered null and void in accordance with 15 CFR part 904.
( d ) *Return.* Tags that have been rendered null and void must be returned to the Regional Administrator, if possible.
( e ) *Loss.* Loss or theft of tags must be reported by the owner, numerically identifying the tags to the Regional Administrator by telephone as soon as the loss or theft is discovered and in writing within 24 hours. Thereafter, the reported tags shall no longer be valid for use under this part.
( f ) *Replacement.* Lost or stolen tags may be replaced by the Regional Administrator if proper notice of the loss is provided by the person to whom the tags were issued. Replacement tags may be purchased from the Regional Administrator or a vendor with a written authorization from the Regional Administrator.
( g ) *Transfer.* See § 648.74(b)(2).
( h ) *Presumptions.* Surfclams and ocean quahogs found in cages without a valid state tag are deemed to have been harvested in the EEZ and to be part of an individual's allocation, unless the individual demonstrates that he/she has surrendered his/her Federal vessel permit issued under § 648.4(a)(4) and conducted fishing operations exclusively within waters under the jurisdiction of any state. Surfclams and ocean quahogs in cages with a Federal tag or tags, issued and still valid pursuant to this section, affixed thereto are deemed to have been harvested by the individual allocation holder to whom the tags were issued under the provisions of § 648.77(b) or transferred under the provisions of § 648.74(b).
[76 FR 60625, Sept. 29, 2011]
# EUR-Lex - 12004V134 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V134

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART III — THE POLICIES AND FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - TITLE III — INTERNAL POLICIES AND ACTION - CHAPTER I — INTERNAL MARKET - Section 1 — Establishment and functioning of the Internal Market - Article III-134 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0059 - 0060 *

Article III-134

European laws or framework laws shall establish the measures needed to bring about freedom of movement for workers, as defined in Article III-133. They shall be adopted after consultation of the Economic and Social Committee.

Such European laws or framework laws shall aim, in particular, to:

(a) ensure close cooperation between national employment services;

(b) abolish those administrative procedures and practices and those qualifying periods in respect of eligibility for available employment, whether resulting from national legislation or from agreements previously concluded between Member States, the maintenance of which would form an obstacle to liberalisation of the movement of workers;

(c) abolish all such qualifying periods and other restrictions provided for either under national legislation or under agreements previously concluded between Member States as impose on workers of other Member States conditions regarding the free choice of employment other than those imposed on workers of the State concerned;

(d) set up appropriate machinery to bring offers of employment into touch with applications for employment and to facilitate the achievement of a balance between supply and demand in the employment market in such a way as to avoid serious threats to the standard of living and level of employment in the various regions and industries.

--------------------------------------------------
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000866722
<NAME> GRANT GEOPHYSICAL, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           8,027
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   27,667
<ALLOWANCES>                                        86
<INVENTORY>                                        512
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                44,821
<PP&E>                                          93,264
<DEPRECIATION>                                  27,359
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 166,441
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           30,448
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            14
<OTHER-SE>                                      41,727
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   166,441
<SALES>                                        175,512
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               175,512
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  169,166
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (260)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,380
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,774)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,924
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,698)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (8,138)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.57)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.57)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Innovative Software Technologies, Inc
(the  "Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending March 31, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Peter M. Peterson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

      (1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.


/s/ Peter M. Peterson
-----------------------
Peter M. Peterson
Chief Executive Officer
May 20, 2005
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 20

- 00092

- CV

Eduardo Barrientos v. Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc.
On Appeal from the 444th District Court of Cameron County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2019

- DCL

- 6497

- H

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, ha ving considered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellant. We further order this decision certified below for observance. August 5, 2021
EXHIBIT
32.1





Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








I,
Michael Timms, Chief Executive Officer and President of Australian Forest
Industries (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:





(1)           the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30,
2008 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)           the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: August
19, 2008





/s/
Michael Timms


Michael
Timms


Chief
Executive Officer and President
#### § 19.2 Scope of regulations.

The regulations contained in this part apply to all persons within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States, to all United States citizens whether within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States or on the high seas or on board aircraft in flight over the high seas, and to all persons on board aircraft belonging in whole or in part to any United States citizen, firm, or partnership, or corporation created by or under the laws of the United States, or any State, territory or possession thereof.
```

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss.1350)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  ss.1350),
the  undersigned,  Guy J. Quigley,  the Chief  Executive  Officer of The Quigley
Corporation,  a Nevada corporation (the "Company"),  does hereby certify, to his
knowledge, that:

The  Annual  Report on Form 10-K for the year  ended  December  31,  2005 of the
Company (the "Report") fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, and the information  contained in
the Report fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial  condition
and results of operations of the Company.

                                                       /s/ Guy J. Quigley
                                                       -------------------------
                                                       Guy J. Quigley
                                                       Chief Executive Officer
                                                       March 23, 2006
```
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 21

- 50754 Summary Calendar

**United States of America,**

Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus

**Marcos Guzman**

**- Avila,** 

Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 2:21

- CR

- 44

- 1

Before **Higginbotham, Higginson,** and **Duncan,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** *

The attorney appointed to represent Marcos Guzman

- Avila has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Guzman

- Avila has not filed a response. We have reviewed

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED March 17, 2022
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 21-50754 Document: 00516243998 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/17/2022No. 21

- 50754

2 counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to
withdraw is **GRANTED** , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the **APPEAL IS DISMISSED**

. See **5th Cir. R.** 42.2

. Case: 21-50754 Document: 00516243998 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/17/2022
###### Editorial Note on Part 679

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 679 appear at 61 FR 56438, Nov. 1, 1996; 62 FR 2047, Jan. 15, 1997; 66 FR 27909, May 21, 2001; 67 FR 79739, Dec. 30, 2002; and 77 FR 6502, Feb. 8, 2012.

#### § 679.110 Applicability.

This subpart contains regulations governing the commercial and recreational harvest of salmon in the Salmon Management Area (See § 679.2).
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
      2002**




I,
      John
      F. Lanzafame, Chief Executive Officer of Biophan Technologies, Inc. (the
      "Company"), certify to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 31, 2008 of the
      Company, that:




(1)
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)
      the
      information contained in the Report, fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
                October 14, 2008/s/
                John F. LanzafameJohn
                F. Lanzafame
              Chief
                Executive Officer