alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EUR-Lex - 12002E055 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 12002E055

**Treaty establishing the European Community (Nice consolidated version) - Part Three: Community policies - Title III: Free movement of persons, services and capital - Chapter 3: Services - Article 55 - Article 66 - EC Treaty (Maastricht consolidated version) - Article 66 - EEC Treaty **

*
Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0056 - 0056 Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0198 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0024 - Consolidated version (EEC Treaty - no official publication available) *

Treaty establishing the European Community (Nice consolidated version)

Part Three: Community policies

Title III: Free movement of persons, services and capital

Chapter 3: Services

Article 55

Article 66 - EC Treaty (Maastricht consolidated version)

Article 66 - EEC Treaty

Article 55

The provisions of Articles 45 to 48 shall apply to the matters covered by this chapter.
§ 1120.37 A&TBCB action on appeals. ( a ) The General Counsel must make one of the following legal determinations in connection with every appeal from the initial denial of a request for an existing, located record: ( 1 ) The record must be disclosed;
( 2 ) The record must not be disclosed because a statute or a provision of this part so requires; or
( 3 ) The record is exempt from mandatory disclosure but legally may be disclosed as a matter of agency discretion.
( b ) Whenever the General Counsel has determined under paragraph (a)(3) of this section that a record is exempt from mandatory disclosure but legally may be disclosed, the matter must be referred to the Executive Director. If the Executive Director determines that an important purpose would be served by withholding the record, the General Counsel shall issue a determination denying the appeal. If the Executive Director determines that no important purpose would be served by withholding the record, the General Counsel must disclose the record.
( c ) The General Counsel may delegate his or her authority under this section to any other attorney employed by the A&TBCB in connection with any cateogory of appeals or any individual appeals.
( d ) A determination denying an appeal from an initial denial must— ( 1 ) Be in writing;
( 2 ) State which of the exemptions in 5 U.S.C. 552(b) apply to each requested existing record;
( 3 ) State the reason(s) for denial of the appeal;
( 4 ) State the name and position of each A&TBCB officer or employee who directed that the appeal be denied; and
( 5 ) State that the person whose request was denied may obtain de novo judicial review of the denial by complaint filed with the district court of the United States in the district in which the complainant resides, or in which the agency records are situated, or in the District of Columbia, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(4).
# Map            Hong Kong and vicinity.
; Generated by FastSum - an extremely fast checksum utility.
; Go to www.fastsum.com to get your own copy for free.
;
D741598DA04E8FB59E4AC1C0D1A67948 *USGS Minerals Information Mineral Industry Surveys.htm
§ 510.9 Uniform pay guidelines. ( a ) Compensation of members and staff of, and consultants to the Committee of Scientific Advisors on Marine Mammals is fixed in accordance with 16 U.S.C. 1401(e), 1403(b), and 1406.
( b ) Compensation for members and staff of, and consultants to all advisory committees reporting to the Commission except the Committee of Scientific Advisors on Marine Mammals shall be fixed in accordance with guidelines established by the Director of the Office of Management and Budget pursuant to section 7(d) of the Act, 5 U.S.C. appendix I.
§ 80.81 What must an agency submit when applying for a comprehensive-management-system grant? A State fish and wildlife agency must submit the following documents when applying for a comprehensive-management-system grant: ( a ) The standard form for an application for Federal assistance in a mandatory grant program.
( b ) The standard forms for assurances for nonconstruction programs and construction programs as applicable. Agencies may submit these standard forms for assurances annually to the Regional Director for use with all applications for Federal assistance in the programs and subprograms under the Acts.
( c ) A statement of cost estimates by subaccount. Agencies may obtain the subaccount numbers from the Service's Regional Division of Wildlife and Sport Fish Restoration.
( d ) Supporting documentation explaining how the proposed work complies with the Acts, the provisions of this part, and other applicable laws and regulations.
( e ) A statement of the agency's intent to carry out and fund part or all of its comprehensive management system through a grant.
( f ) A description of the agency's comprehensive management system including inventory, strategic plan, operational plan, and evaluation. “Inventory” refers to the process or processes that an agency uses to: ( 1 ) Determine actual, projected, and desired resource and asset status; and
( 2 ) Identify management problems, issues, needs, and opportunities.
( g ) A description of the State fish and wildlife agency program covered by the comprehensive management system.
( h ) Contact information for the State fish and wildlife agency employee who is directly responsible for the integrity and operation of the comprehensive management system.
( i ) A description of how the public can take part in decisionmaking for the comprehensive management system.
Dolan Chemical Laboratory

4001 Bixby Road

Groveport, OH 43125

T: 614-836-4221, Audinet 210-4221

F: 614-836-4168, Audinet 210-4168

http://aepenv/labs

Water Analysis

Location: Mountaineer Plant Report Date: 8/30/2012

Form REP-703

Rev. 0, 4/2012

Sample Number: 123611-001 Date Collected: 08/21/2012 13:00 Date Received: 8/22/2012

Bioreactor Effluent 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Data 

Qual

Arsenic, As 3.18 ug/L 0.1 0.03 DPC 08/27/2012 13:21 EPA 200.8

Beryllium, Be < 0.1 ug/L U 0.5 0.1 DAM 08/29/2012 09:52 EPA 200.7

Molybdenum, Mo 529 ug/L 0.1 0.02 DPC 08/27/2012 13:21 EPA 200.8

Nickel, Ni 2.52 ug/L 0.2 0.04 DPC 08/27/2012 13:21 EPA 200.8

Selenium, Se 0.8 ug/L 0.5 0.1 DPC 08/27/2012 13:21 EPA 200.8

Uranium, U 95.0 ug/L 0.01 0.002 DPC 08/27/2012 13:21 EPA 200.8

Aluminum, Al 1.53 mg/L 0.001 0.0003 DPC 08/27/2012 13:21 EPA 200.8

Boron, B 179 mg/L 0.01 0.002 DAM 08/29/2012 09:52 EPA 200.7

Iron, Fe 0.772 mg/L 0.01 0.002 DAM 08/29/2012 09:52 EPA 200.7

Manganese, Mn 6.91 mg/L 0.0005 0.0001 DAM 08/29/2012 09:52 EPA 200.7

Sample Number: 123611-002 Date Collected: 08/21/2012 13:00 Date Received: 8/22/2012

 Nutrient Tank

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Data 

Qual

Arsenic, As 155 ug/L 5 2 DPC 08/27/2012 13:26 EPA 200.8

Beryllium, Be < 5 ug/L U 20 5 DAM 08/29/2012 10:36 EPA 200.7

Molybdenum, Mo 141 ug/L 5 1 DPC 08/27/2012 13:26 EPA 200.8

Nickel, Ni 633 ug/L 10 2 DPC 08/27/2012 13:26 EPA 200.8

Selenium, Se 221 ug/L 20 5 DPC 08/27/2012 13:26 EPA 200.8

Uranium, U 241 ug/L 0.5 0.1 DPC 08/27/2012 13:26 EPA 200.8

Aluminum, Al 22.1 mg/L 0.05 0.02 DPC 08/27/2012 13:26 EPA 200.8

Boron, B 4.70 mg/L 0.5 0.1 DAM 08/29/2012 10:37 EPA 200.7

Iron, Fe 110 mg/L 0.5 0.1 DAM 08/29/2012 10:36 EPA 200.7

Manganese, Mn 11.0 mg/L 0.02 0.005 DAM 08/29/2012 10:36 EPA 200.7

Mountaineer Plant, 123611 Page 1 of 2
THIS TEST REPORT RELATES ONLY TO THE ITEMS TESTED AND SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED EXCEPT IN FULL WITHOUT WRITTEN 

APPROVAL OF THE LABORATORY. ALL TEST RESULTS MEET ALL OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ACCREDITING AUTHORITY, 

UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.

U: Analyte was analyzed and not detected at or above adjusted Method Detection Limit

J: Analyte was positively identified, though the quantitation was below Reporting Limit.

Brian Snyder, Chemist II

Email bssnyder@aep.com Tel. 614-836-4224

Fax 614-836-4168 Audinet 210-4224

Mountaineer Plant, 123611 Page 2 of 2
#### § 665.143 Prohibitions.

In addition to the general prohibitions specified in § 600.725 of this chapter and § 665.15, in Crustacean Permit Area 3, it is unlawful for any person to fish for, take, or retain deepwater shrimp without a permit issued under § 665.142.
EXHIBIT 31.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 RULE 13a-14(a)

I, Michael L. Weiner, Chief Executive Officer of Biophan Technologies, Inc. (the
"registrant"), certify that:

1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Biophan Technologies,
Inc.;

2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4) The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5) The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: October 17, 2005

/s/Michael L. Weiner
-----------------------
Michael L. Weiner
Chief Executive Officer


                                       21
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5260

To provide for the protection of wild horses within the Ozark National

Scenic Riverways and prohibit the removal of such horses.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 7, 1994

Mr. EMERSON (for himself, Mr. SKELTON, and Mr. HANCOCK) introduced the

following bill; which was referred jointly to the Committees on Merchant

Marine and Fisheries and Natural Resources

A BILL

To provide for the protection of wild horses within the Ozark

National Scenic Riverways and prohibit the removal of

such horses.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ozark Wild Horses

5 Protection Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. PROTECTION OF FREE-ROAMING HORSES.

7 The first section of the Act entitled ‘‘An Act to pro8 vide for the establishment of the Ozark National Scenic

9 Riverways in the State of Missouri, and for other pur-
2

•HR 5260 IH

1 poses’’, approved August 27, 1964 (78 Stat. 608; 16

2 U.S.C. 460m), is amended in the first sentence by insert3 ing ‘‘protection and preservation of free-roaming horses,’’

4 after ‘‘wildlife,’’.

5 SEC. 3. PROHIBITION OF REMOVAL OF HORSES.

6 Section 5 of the Act entitled ‘‘An Act to provide for

7 the establishment of the Ozark National Scenic Riverways

8 in the State of Missouri, and for other purposes’’, ap9 proved August 27, 1964 (78 Stat. 609; 16 U.S.C. 460m–

10 4), is amended by adding the following new subsection at

11 the end:

12 ‘‘(c) The Secretary may not remove, or allow or assist

13 in the removal of, any free-roaming horse from Federal

14 lands within the boundaries of the Ozark National Scenic

15 Riverways, except in the case of medical emergency or nat16 ural disaster.’’.

Æ
Argued and submitted September 24, 1993,

affirmed January 26,

petition for review allowed May 10, 1994 (319 Or 80)

#### In the Matter of the Compensation of Rexi L. Nicholson, Claimant. Rexi L. NICHOLSON, *Petitioner, v.*SALEM AREA TRANSIT and SAIF Corporation, *Respondents.*

(91-03460; CA A76237)

866 P2d 525

Karen M. Werner argued the cause for petitioner. With her on the brief was Emmons, Kropp, Kryger, Alexander, Egan & Allen.

Steve Cotton, Special Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.

Before Rossman, Presiding Judge, and De Muniz and Leeson, Judges.

PER CURIAM

*173PER CURIAM

Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board holding that it does not have jurisdiction to review an order of the Director under ORS 656.245(1)(b) concerning the appropriateness of palliative care. We have disposed of most of the issues that claimant raises in *Hathaway v. Health Future Enterprises,*125 Or App 549, 865 P2d 503 (1993). Claimant contends that the Board’s ruling that claimant has no right to a hearing on palliative care disputes violates the United States and Oregon constitutions. The issue is raised for the first time on review, and we will not address it.

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999             JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           1,808                       0
<SECURITIES>                                    36,393                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   61,397                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               123,351                       0
<PP&E>                                       1,220,167                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 325,453                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,037,562                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           56,709                       0
<BONDS>                                        744,457                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                     28,468                       0
<COMMON>                                           541                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     188,131                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,037,562                       0
<SALES>                                         65,550                 134,965
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               111,623                 181,844
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   54,793                 111,970
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,209                  28,783
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 43,621                  41,091
<INCOME-TAX>                                    14,835                  13,951
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             28,786                  27,140
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    28,341                  26,250
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.63                    0.59
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.61                    0.57


</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.14
                              AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE
                                       TO
                           MARKS BROS. JEWELERS, INC.
                  1998 NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR STOCK OPTION PLAN

                  WHEREAS, Whitehall Jewellers, Inc., a Delaware corporation
(the "Company"), formerly known as Marks Bros. Jewelers, Inc., has adopted and
maintains a stock option plan for the benefit of certain non-employee directors
titled the "Marks Bros. Jewelers, Inc. 1998 Non-Employee Director Stock Option
Plan" (the "Plan"); and

                  WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan to reflect the
change in the Company's name;

                  NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to the power of amendment contained
in Section 3.2 of the Plan, the Plan is hereby amended effective as of January
20, 1999, as follows:

                  1. The Plan is hereby renamed the "Whitehall Jewellers, Inc.
1998 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan" and all references to the title of
the Plan contained therein are hereby amended to reflect the change in the
Plan's name.

                  2. Section 1.1 of the Plan is hereby amended by substituting
the name "Whitehall Jewellers, Inc." for the name "Marks Bros. Jewelers, Inc."
as it appears therein and all other





<PAGE>   2


references to "Marks Bros. Jewelers, Inc." contained in the Plan are hereby
changed to "Whitehall Jewellers, Inc.".

                  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this instrument to
be executed by its Chairman and attested by its Secretary on this 26th day of
January, 1999.


                                             WHITEHALL JEWELLERS, INC.


                                             By:  /s/ Hugh M. Patinkin    
                                                 ------------------------------
                                                            Chairman



ATTEST:


    /s/ John R. Desjardins       
------------------------------
          Secretary











                                      -2-
#### § 1915.1020 Access to employee exposure and medical records.

Note:

The requirements applicable to shipyard employment under this section are identical to those set forth at [§ 1910.1020 of this chapter](/on/2024-09-23/title-29/section-1910.1020).

[[61 FR 31431](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/61-FR-31431), June 20, 1996]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         294,518
<SECURITIES>                                 2,221,056
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,705,089
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,313,018
<PP&E>                                     111,897,851
<DEPRECIATION>                              61,651,637
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              56,612,953
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,888,784
<BONDS>                                        452,093
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  52,171,076
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                56,612,953
<SALES>                                     16,058,164
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            16,558,366
<CGS>                                        2,550,686
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,521,309
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,113,492
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              85,660
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              6,967,089
<INCOME-TAX>                                    70,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 6,897,087
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Case 16-26597 Doc 13 Filed 09/12/16 Entered 09/13/16 06:01:25 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0573

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

VALERIE SUE DOGTAKINGGUN GRANT,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including August 23, 2023, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 17 2023

07/17/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0573
Placeholder: Confidential Business Information item

Polar Technology LLC CBI Comment on 2-4-12

For more information please contact David Donaldson by phone at 202-343-9086 or by email at 

donaldson.david@epa.gov.
§ 1012.8 How will the Presidio Trust process my Touhy Request? ( a ) The Executive Director will decide whether to grant or deny your *Touhy* Request. The Presidio Trust's General Counsel, or his or her agent, may negotiate with you or your attorney to refine or limit both the timing and content of your *Touhy* Request. When necessary, the General Counsel also will coordinate with the Department of Justice to file appropriate motions, including motions to remove the matter to Federal court, to quash, or to obtain a protective order.
( b ) We will limit the Presidio Trust's decision to allow employee testimony to the scope of your *Touhy* Request.
( c ) If you fail to follow the requirements of this part, we will not allow the testimony or produce the records.
( d ) If your *Touhy* Request is complete, we will consider the request under § 1012.9.
§ 665.103 Prohibitions. In addition to the general prohibitions specified in § 600.725 of this chapter and § 665.15, it is unlawful for any person to do any of the following: ( a ) Fish for American Samoa bottomfish MUS or ECS using gear prohibited under § 665.104.
( b ) Fish for or possess any American Samoa Bottomfish MUS as defined in § 665.101 after a closure of the fishery in violation of § 665.106.
( c ) Sell or offer for sale any American Samoa Bottomfish MUS as defined in § 665.101 after a closure of the fishery in violation of § 665.106.
[87 FR 25593, May 2, 2022]