alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
c% P(JBLICATIONSAUTHORI7LlrI ..,ND INVOICE 154632

JJBLICATIONS AUTHORlZA11ojj be conipøiited by agency)TO:(NEANDADDRESSOFNEWSPAPERI-•FEDERALLO.NO/SOC.SEC.NO.FROM:(NAMEArDADDRESSOFAGENCY)AGENCYTELEPHONEND

lliaMaport Sun—Gazette 24—0736730 Yvette M. House 71Z—Zj9.49,... Box 728. Bureau of Air Quality

Williamaport, PA 17703 400 Market St, 12th Floor

•( Harrisburg, PA 17105HEREWITHISENCLOSEDCOPYFORPUOUCATIONOFADVERTISEMENTFORPROPOSALSTOTYPEOFADEMPLOY LIPURCHASE ElCONTRACTSELL.CLASSIFiEDLEGALNOTICEPUBUSHADVERTISEMENT(NO.OFTIMES)MALIMUMNO.OFLINESDATEORDERNO.

1 October 15, 2009DATESOFINSERTIONSIGNREFORAGCY

October 16, 2009, Friday edition

You, as vendor, are• authorized- to’ publish this adtertisement in your newspaper, subject- to the terms of this order, as

follows: Advertisement to be published in regular advertising columns, no position specified; caption of two lines and signature

to be in capitals and subject matter and title of officer.to be set solid in type regularly used by_your newspaper for public (legal)

notice advertising; charge to be made at the rate charged to and paid by commercial advertisers for matter similarly set and

occupying similar space; advertisement to be run in the editions specified above. Vendor agrees that, in the performance of any

contract awarded to it hereunder, said vendor will not discriminate against any employe or other persons on account of race, color,

sex, religious creed, ancestry, age or national origin and that the Commonwealth, upon receipt of satisfactory evidence of such

discrimination, shall have the right to cancel said contract. Return this copyat once if you will not accept this advertisement under the terms

set forth. Proof of advertising in the form of a tearsheet must be included on Parts 1,2 & 3. Return original and two copies (signed

by the editor or publisher) to Agency listed above. Part 1 must be notarized. Part 4 is yours.

Commonwealth to be billed only for actual number of printed lines published.ACCOUNTFUNDDEPTAPPYEARLOGORGCOSTFUNCTIONOBJAMOUNTCODE SA P olOO 7O90I

CC 35 Z7j c*YOc’ (, 3

INVOICE (To be completed by publisher):DATEOFINSERTIONACTUALNO.OFPRINTEDUNESCOSTPERLINETOTALAMOUNT

istAd 1-5 37 tO1’

3rdAd.‘-:....i__-_—,_I

PASTE TEARSHEET HERE

Cornri 3 wpah oPe 9 r)s’lvpia

County of (‘Of

Before m, the subscriber5aJiotary Public in and fJ ¶,u 1 ]ty. ersonally came _____________________________________

who betn Y% 5 lth ye jaat h* 1 newspaper published at /_Ll ((‘

that the advertisemet, of which tearsheet is attached-hereto, was published in the regular advertising columns of said newspaper,

in the editions of said newspaper, in all respects as ordered and invoiced above; and that the Commonwealth is not charged

therefor at a rate higher than is charged any ordinary commercial advertiser for a similar amount of matter occupyqg similar space

and set in a similar manner, in said newspaper..

cnd subscn ,efore me this 20 C 7COMMONWEALTHOFPENNSYLVANIASTD—52)REV.2-a83t4A56&414J107•vOicE.:i

2nd Ad•E.:.—.

GRAND TOTAL-’ &c)

7c-‘ qL4Lorpublisher.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 5106 

To amend the Federal Meat Inspection Act to exempt certain owners of 

livestock from inspection requirements, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 19, 2024 

Mr. WELCH (for himself, Mr. BOOKER, and Mr. SANDERS) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Meat Inspection Act to exempt certain 

owners of livestock from inspection requirements, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Livestock Owned by 

5 Communities to Advance Local Foods Act of 2024’’ or the 

6 ‘‘LOCAL Foods Act of 2024’’. 

7 SEC. 2. EXEMPTIONS FROM INSPECTION. 

8 Section 23(a) of the Federal Meat Inspection Act (21 

9 U.S.C. 623(a)) is amended by striking ‘‘the slaughtering 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 5106 IS

1 by any person of animals of his own raising, and the prep2 aration by him and transportation in commerce of the car3 casses, parts thereof, meat and meat food products of such 

4 animals exclusively for use by him and members of his 

5 household and his nonpaying guests and employees’’ and 

6 inserting ‘‘the slaughtering of animals by any person that 

7 is an owner of the animals in whole or in part, or the 

8 preparation or transportation in commerce of the car9 casses or parts thereof or meat and meat food products 

10 from those animals by an owner, if such slaughter, prepa11 ration, or transportation is exclusively for the use of an 

12 owner or the household, nonpaying guests, or employees 

13 of an owner, subject to the condition that if an owner des14 ignates an agent to assist in such slaughter, preparation, 

15 or transportation, the owner shall maintain custody and 

16 specific identification of the carcasses or parts thereof or 

17 meat and meat food products, as determined by the Sec18 retary’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
# Map            Vanuatu.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

RAYMOND PLATT
, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 18

- 2231

[ April 10, 2019 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Barbara Anne McCarthy , Judge; L.T. Case No.

14013174CF10A

.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Erika Follmer, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Alexandra A. Folley, Assistant Attorney Gen eral, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Appellant appeals his sentence raising six issues. We remand on one

of these issues and otherwise affirm without discussion . T he State concedes the trial court erroneously added 3.2 points for prior con victions more than fifteen years old . Defendant challenged the inclusion of the priors in a Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)(1) motion, and the

State declined to provide competent evidence demonstrating the appellant’s release “from confinement , supervision, or other sanction ” within ten years of the new offense. Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.704(d)(14)(A) ; c f.

Dresch v. State , 150 So. 3d 1199, 1200 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014) (holding the State was required to provide competent evidence that the defendant had

committed the crimes listed on his scoresheet when he challenged the

inclusion of the crimes in a rule 3.800(b)(1) motion)

. Accordingly, we

remand with instructions to the trial court to correct the scoresheet. See Naugle v. State , 244 So. 3d 1127, 1128 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018). We do not remand for resentencing, however, because “ the record conclusively shows

that the trial court would have imposed the same sentence using a correct

scoresheet. ” Id . (quoting Brooks v. State , 969 So. 2d 238, 241 (Fla. 2007) )

.2 Affirmed ; remanded for correction of scoresheet only.

D AMOORGIAN

, C ONNER and F ORST

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5285

To close loopholes in the firearms laws which allow the unregulated manufacture, assembly, shipment, or transportation of firearms or firearm parts,

and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 7, 1994

Mr. TORRICELLI introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To close loopholes in the firearms laws which allow the

unregulated manufacture, assembly, shipment, or transportation of firearms or firearm parts, and for other

purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION AGAINST SHIPMENT OR TRANS4 PORTATION OF FIREARM PARTS, WITH CER5 TAIN EXCEPTIONS.

6 Section 921(a)(3)(B) of title 18, United States Code,

7 is amended by inserting ‘‘(and, for purposes of section
2

•HR 5285 IH

1 922(a)(2), the barrel, stock, ammunition magazine, or any

2 part of the action)’’ before ‘‘of any such weapon’’.

3 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION AGAINST MANUFACTURE OR ASSEM4 BLY OF FIREARMS BY PERSONS OTHER THAN

5 LICENSED MANUFACTURERS.

6 Section 922 of title 18, United States Code, is

7 amended by adding at the end the following:

8 ‘‘(y) It shall be unlawful for any person other than

9 a licensed manufacturer to manufacture or assemble a

10 firearm.’’.

11 SEC. 3. INCREASE IN FEE FOR LICENSE TO MANUFACTURE

12 FIREARMS.

13 Section 923(a)(1)(B) of title 18, United States Code,

14 is amended by striking ‘‘$50’’ and inserting ‘‘$500’’.

15 SEC. 4. PROHIBITION AGAINST POSSESSION OR TRANSFER

16 OF CERTAIN COMBINATIONS OF MACHINE17 GUN REPLACEMENT PARTS.

18 Section 5845(b) of the National Firearms Act is

19 amended in the 2nd sentence by striking ‘‘designed and

20 intended solely and exclusively, or combination of parts de21 signed and intended,’’ and inserting ‘‘or combination of

22 parts designed and intended’’.
3

•HR 5285 IH

1 SEC. 5. EFFECTIVE DATE.

2 The amendments made by this Act shall apply to con3 duct engaged in after the 60-day period that begins with

4 the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
## F IFTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ Case No. 5D2 02 4- 0725 LT Case No. 2 023
- CF
- 003140 -A

_____________________________ R EAVIS K ENDRICK , Appella nt, v. S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee .

_____________________________ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Marion County. Robert W. Hodges, Judge. Matthew J. Metz, Public Def ender, and George D.E. Burden, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Bea ch, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Allison L. Morris , Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee. August 27, 2024 P ER C URIAM . A FFIRMED . E ISNAUGLE , H ARRIS , and P RATT , JJ., concur.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331 .

_____________________________
Exhibit 32.1
 
 Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
 I,
William S. Rosenstadt, Chief Executive Officer, President and Acting Principal
Accounting Officer of Lone Pine Holdings, Inc. (the "Company"), certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, that:
 
 (1)           the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended  March
31, 2009 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 (2)           the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
  Date: May
19, 2009
 
 /s/  William S.
Rosenstadt
 Name:
William S. Rosenstadt
 Title:
CEO, President and Principal Accounting Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-6215

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

LUTHER LOCKLEAR,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. Louise W. Flanagan, 

District Judge. (7:09-cr-00033-FL-2; 7:12-cv-00074-FL)

Submitted: January 13, 2015 Decided: January 26, 2015

Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas Reston Wilson, GREENE & WILSON, PA, New Bern, North 

Carolina, for Appellant. Jennifer P. May-Parker, Ethan A. 

Ontjes, Assistant United States Attorneys, Yvonne Victoria 

Watford-McKinney, Seth Morgan Wood, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES 

ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Luther Locklear appeals the district court’s order 

dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. We have reviewed 

the record and conclude that the district court properly 

dismissed the motion as untimely. Locklear’s claims on appeal 

are squarely foreclosed by our recent decision in Whiteside v. 

United States, __ F.3d __, 2014 WL 7245453 (4th Cir. Dec. 19, 

2014) (en banc), and we therefore affirm the district court’s 

judgment. United States v. Locklear, Nos. 7:09-cr-00033-FL-2; 

7:12-cv-00074-FL (E.D.N.C. Jan. 28, 2014). We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. §1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Rochester Medical Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Anthony J. Conway, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:



| | 1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ Anthony J. Conway

Anthony J. ConwayChief Executive OfficerDecember 15, 2004
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 185 (Monday, September 25, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 55804]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-8170]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation Nos. 731-TA-703 and 705 (Second Review)]


Furfuryl Alcohol From China and Thailand

Determinations

    On the basis of the record \1\ developed in the subject five-year 
reviews, the United States International Trade Commission (Commission) 
determines, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 
U.S.C. 1675(c)) (the Act), that revocation of the antidumping duty 
orders on furfuryl alcohol from China and Thailand would be likely to 
lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in 
the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Background

    The Commission instituted these reviews on April 3, 2006 (71 FR 
16587) and determined on July 7, 2006 that it would conduct expedited 
reviews (71 FR 41469, July 21, 2006). Notice of the scheduling of the 
Commission's reviews was given by posting copies of the notice in the 
Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 
Washington, DC, and by publishing the notice in the Federal Register on 
July 21, 2006 (71 FR 41469).
    The Commission transmitted its determinations in these reviews to 
the Secretary of Commerce on September 15, 2006. The views of the 
Commission are contained in USITC Publication 3885 (September 2006), 
entitled Furfuryl Alcohol from China and Thailand: Investigation Nos. 
731-TA-703 and 705 (Second Review).

    Issued: September 20, 2006.

    By order of the Commission.

Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 06-8170 Filed 9-22-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
# «? M ^ 

## ^[^ ^

OFFIC E O F TH E COMMISSIONE R SEA N PARNEL L GOVERNO R 4111 1 A VI A HO N A VENU E P O Bo x 19690 0 ANCHORAG E ALASK

A 99519-690 0 FAX . PHONE : (907 ) 269-073 0

{907 ) 269-048 9 Marc h 2 , 201 1 Mr . Denni s J . DeVaiiy Chief , Essential Ai

r Servic e Divisio n Offic e o f Aviatio n Analysi s U.S . Department

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S E Washington . D C 2059 0 RE ; Docket

2000-706 8 Dea r Mr . DeVanv : 

## r'te o c-r i Thi s lette r i s to expres s suppor

t fo r th e continuatio n o f

th e Essentia

l ai r Servic e (EAS ) progra

m i n Alask aan

dth e crucial connectio n i

t bring s to ou

r remote communities . Du e t o th e isolate dlocatio n o f thes e communitie s an d th e complet e lack o f an y roa d syste m connection , thi s subsidize dair servic e i s thei r

only for mo f schedule d transportation . Th e communit y o f Akutan depend s o n schedule d air freight , passenge r

an d mai l servic e fo

r basi c necessities , routin e medical an dhealt h services , an d economi c welfare . Th e State o f

Alask acontinue s to asser t tha t th e loca l resident s are bes t

positione d to comment

o n particula r schedule s or

ai r carrier s an d therefore w e leav e thos e specifi c area s fo r th e communit

y to commen t

on . I respectfull y urg e (JSDO T t o suppor t an d continu e th e EA S servic e a t Akuta n an d suppor

t th e carrie r selectio n tha

t applie dt o provid e thi s service .

Sincerely , Steve n "D . Hatter Deput y Commissione r

- Aviatio n

cc : Marc Luiken . Commissioner . DOT&PF
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

WILLIAM SIMMONS,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 417 EAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

WILLIAM SIMMONS,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 418 EAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 11th day of May, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: FAA- 2011 - 1171 Directorate Identifier: 2011NM101AD

737 - 21A1132, R2 --- 6/13/07

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket **MA Y BE VIEWED AT:**  Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 03/05/2008
SAT Report

PMN Number: P-15-0386

SAT Date: 4/14/2015

Print Date: 5/8/2015

Related cases: Yes

Health related cases: 

Ecotox related cases: 

Concern levels:

Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments

Level of Concern: 1-2 3

 Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments

1 12

Exposure Based Review:

Health: No

Ecotox: No

Routes of exposure: Health: Dermal Inhalation 

Ecotox: All releases to water

Fate: ;

Keywords:

 Keywords: SENS-DERMAL/RESPIRATORY MUTA ONCO DEVEL 

REPRO-M LIVER KIDNEY AQUATOX-A,C

Summary of Assessment:

 Fate:

Fate Summary: P-15-0386

FATE: 

Liquid with MP < -100 C (M)

log Kow = 4.00 (M) 

S = 54.8 mg/L at 25 C (M)

VP = 3.5E-2 torr at 25 C (E)

BP = 245 C (E)

H = 9.04E-4 (E)

log Koc = 2.69 (E)
log Fish BCF = 2.31 (E)

log Fish BAF = 2.23 (E) 

POTW removal (%) = 90 via sorption, stripping, and biodeg; OECD 310(CO2 Headspace Test): 

72%/28d.

Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = wk

Sorption to soils/sediments = moderate 

Volatilization half-life from a standard river = 2 hrs

Volatilization half-life from a standard lake = 6 da

Atmospheric Oxidation Half-life = 0.86 hr via OH radical

Atmospheric Oxidation Half-life = 0.62 hr via ozone

PBT Potential: P1B1

*CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = slow

 Health:

 Health Summary: Absorption is good all routes based on analogs. 

Oxidation of the terminal double bond via an epoxide may occur but may be limited by the 

hindered the methyl group. To the extent that an epoxide forms, there is concern for skin and 

lung sensitization, mutagenicity, oncogenicity, developmental toxicity, male reproductive, liver, 

and kidney toxicity. Low moderate concern.

 Ecotox:

Test Organism Test 

Type

Test End 

Point

Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 1.2

daphnid 48-h LC50 1.9

green algal 96-h EC50 0.57

fish _ chronic value 0.055

daphnid _ chronic 

value

0.68

algal _ chronic 

value

0.31

Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50 _

Sewage Sludge _ Chronic 

Value

_

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for esters; SAR chemical class = 

ester; MW 194; liquid with mp < -100 C (M); S 17.7 mg/L at 20 C (P); pH7; effective 

concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and mean measured concentrations; 

DWhardness <150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and DWTOC <2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments

Assessment Factor 10

Concentration of Concern 
(ppb) 

Acute 

Concentration of Concern 

(ppb) Chronic

6

SARs esters

SAR Class ester

New Chemcial Category Esters

Ecotox Factors Comments: 

 SAT Chair:
# EUR-Lex - 11992E010 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11992E010

**TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY - PART THREE : COMMUNITY POLICIES - TITLE I : FREE MOVEMENT OF GOODS - ARTICLE 10 /* CODIFIED VERSION OF THE TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY */ **

*
Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0011 *

Article 10

1. Products coming from a third country shall be considered to be in free circulation in a Member State if the import formalities have been complied with and any customs duties or charges having equivalent effect which are payable have been levied in that Member State, and if they have not benefited from a total or partial drawback of such duties or charges.

2. The Commission shall, before the end of the first year after the entry into force of this Treaty, determine the methods of administrative cooperation to be adopted for the purpose of applying Article 9(2), taking into account the need to reduce as much as possible formalities imposed on trade.

Before the end of the first year after the entry into force of this Treaty, the Commission shall lay down the provisions applicable, as regards trade between Member States, to goods originating in another Member State in whose manufacture products have been used on which the exporting Member State has not levied the appropriate customs duties or charges having equivalent effect, or which have benefited from a total or partial drawback of such duties or charges.

In adopting these provisions, the Commission shall take into account the rules for the elimination of customs duties within the Community and for the progressive application of the common customs tariff.