alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Argued and submitted July 7, 1993,

affirmed May 4, 1994

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Appellant, v.*GUY RICHARD MACK, *Respondent.*

(92P-3210, 92P-3211; CA A76966 (Control), A76967)

(Cases Consolidated)

873 P2d 344

Timothy A. Sylwester, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.

Jeffrey M. Jones argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Kaino, Jones & Partridge.

Before Richardson, Chief Judge, and Riggs and Haselton,* Judges.

*

 Haselton, J., *vice*Durham, J.

PER CURIAM

Affirmed. *State v. Cookman,*127 Or App 283, 873 P2d 335 (1994).
§ 1002.6 Commercial dog walking. ( a ) The walking of more than six dogs at one time by any one person for consideration (commercial dog walking) is prohibited within the area administered by the Presidio Trust.
( b ) The walking of more than three dogs, with a limit of six dogs, at one time by any one person for consideration (commercial dog walking) within the area administered by the Presidio Trust, where dog walking is otherwise allowed, is hereby authorized provided that: ( 1 ) That person has a valid commercial dog walking permit issued by the Golden Gate National Recreation Area (GGNRA);
( 2 ) The walking of more than three dogs, with a limit of six dogs, is done pursuant to the conditions of that permit; and
( 3 ) The commercial dog walker badge issued to the permittee by the GGNRA shall be visibly displayed at all times as directed in the permit while the permittee is engaging in commercial dog walking activities, and shall be provided upon request to any person authorized to enforce this provision.
[79 FR 48993, Aug. 19, 2014]
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Delta Regional Authority","provider_url":"https:\/\/dra.gov","author_name":"AhaZapier","author_url":"https:\/\/dra.gov\/author\/ahazapier\/","title":"Biden-Harris Administration Announces Over $2.7 Million Investment into West Tennessee Communities - Delta Regional Authority","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"ZGvJkGM8PN\"><a href=\"https:\/\/dra.gov\/biden-harris-administration-announces-over-2-7-million-investment-into-west-tennessee-communities\/\">Biden-Harris Administration Announces Over $2.7 Million Investment into West Tennessee Communities<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/dra.gov\/biden-harris-administration-announces-over-2-7-million-investment-into-west-tennessee-communities\/embed\/#?secret=ZGvJkGM8PN\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Biden-Harris Administration Announces Over $2.7 Million Investment into West Tennessee Communities” — Delta Regional Authority\" data-secret=\"ZGvJkGM8PN\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"Biden-Harris Administration Announces Over $2.7 Million Investment into Western Tennessee Communities","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/mcusercontent.com\/90665e275659657eb2097e76c\/images\/3c279e98-4eee-68aa-d6e2-455119b8e0a5.png"}
Searched for **https://www.ssa.gov/pubs/EN-05-10071.pdf**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **https://www.ssa.gov/pubs/EN-05-10071.pdf**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
Workbook Contents

Cushing, OK WTI Spot Price FOB (Dollars per Barrel)

Click worksheet name or tab at bottom for data

Worksheet Name Description

Data 1 Cushing, OK WTI Spot Price FOB (Dollars per Barrel)

Release Date: 1/3/2014

Next Release Date: 1/8/2014

Excel File Name: rwtca.xls

Available from Web Page: http://tonto.eia.gov/dnav/pet/hist/LeafHandler.ashx?n=PET&s=RWTC&f=A

Source:

For Help, Contact: infoctr@eia.doe.gov

(202) 586-8800
# Of Series Frequency Latest Data for

1 Annual 2012

&s=RWTC&f=A

1/3/2014 11:22:46 AM
Back to Contents Data 1: Cushing, OK WTI Spot Price FOB (Dollars per Barrel)

Sourcekey RWTC

Date

Cushing, OK WTI 

Spot Price FOB 

(Dollars per Barrel)

1986 15.05

1987 19.2

1988 15.97

1989 19.64

1990 24.53

1991 21.54

1992 20.58

1993 18.43

1994 17.2

1995 18.43

1996 22.12

1997 20.61

1998 14.42

1999 19.34

2000 30.38

2001 25.98

2002 26.18

2003 31.08

2004 41.51

2005 56.64

2006 66.05

2007 72.34

2008 99.67

2009 61.95

2010 79.48

2011 94.88

2012 94.05
1

Kelly, Shaheerah

From: Kelly, Shaheerah

Sent: Monday, January 06, 2014 1:23 PM

To: hswriter@frontiernet.net

Cc: R9AirPermits

Subject: RE: 

Ms. Strand, 

The pollutants covered under the PSD permit are addressed in section 4 of the Ambient Air Quality Impact 

Report (AAQIR) issued for public comment on November 8, 2013. The AAQIR also discusses the emissions 

levels that trigger PSD permitting requirements. Here is a link to the AAQIR :

http://www.epa.gov/region9/air/permit/pdf/spi-anderson/2013-11-spi-anderson-ghg-aaqir.pdf 

The 10 / 25 ton per year thresholds referenced in your email are the levels of hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) 

listed in section 112(b) of the Clean Air Act that trigger the requirement to obtain an operating permit under 

Clean Air Act Title V. Carbon dioxide (CO2) is not included on section 112(b) HAPs list. The regulations for 

issuing Title V operating permits are at 40 CFR part 70. Shasta County AQMD is the Title V permitting 

authority for facilities in Shasta County. The AQMD has an approved Title V operating permit program and has 

regulations that EPA has approved as meeting the requirements of 40 CFR part 70. AQMD’s Title V operating 

permit regulations can be found at this link (see Rule V): http://www.arb.ca.gov/drdb/sha/cur.htm 

************************************ 

Shaheerah Kelly 

Permits Office, Air Division (AIR-3) 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

Phone: 415-947-4156 

Fax: 415-947-3579 

Email: kelly.shaheerah@epa.gov

From: hswriter@frontiernet.net [mailto:hswriter@frontiernet.net] 

Sent: Friday, December 20, 2013 9:31 AM 

To: Kelly, Shaheerah 

Cc: Jordan, Deborah 

Subject: 

December 20, 2013

Dear Shaheerah, 

To better understand the permit I am commenting on (SAC 12-01) I need to 

make sure I have the law straight. 

It is my understanding that under the Clean Air Act, A PSD permit is 

required if a stationary source of pollution will emit "10 tons per year 

or more of any hazardous air pollutant or 25 tons per year or more of any 

combination of hazardous air pollutants." 
2

Because of the ruling in favor of The Center for Biological Diversity, Co2 

emissions must be included in that 10/25 ton calculation. 

Thank you for your ongoing help. 

Sincerely, 

Heidi Strand
'" i**':"~ ":** **T/' I**  in'j

. '

_, :1jl '; 1\

. /11



### -- : .

RESPONDED ON DECEMBER 1, 2009 11 :11 AM 

### Bob Poole, Director of Transportation Studies, Reason Foundation
What should Secretary LaHood's new aviation advisory committeefocus on? Let me suggest five guiding principles. First, do no harm. By that I mean don't undercut orhobble the democratization ofair travel ushered in by the Airline Deregulation Act of 1978. Even though adjusting to real competition has been difficult for most legacy carriers (and some new entrants), some airline business models are succeeding, even in today's recession. Passengers overwhelmingly prefer low fares to greater amenities, and we should respect their judgment. Second, implement further reforms ofthe air traffic control system, as recommended by both the Baliles and Mineta Commissions. Implementing the much-needed NextGen paradigm shift will remain high-risk, iftheAir Traffic Organization remains embedded in a traditional federal bureaucracy subject to continual micromanagement and unable to tap the capital markets for large-scale investments. The Nav Canada example ofuserboard governance and a bondable user-charge funding system is the best model for what the ATO shouldbecome. Third, strengthen FAA safety regulation, in two ways. Get serious about applying a single safety standardto all scheduled air service. And put FAA safety regulation at arm's length from the provision ofATC services, by separating theATO from the FAA. The latteris critically importantto ensure public confidence in the major changes (e.g., automation, reduced separation standards) inherent in implementing NextGen. Fourth, get serious about "over-scheduling" at major congested airports, by implementing runway congestion pricing at such airports. Yes, NextGen and more concrete have roles to play, butultimately when peak-period demand still far exceeds capacity, thatlimited capacity mustbe allocated somehow. The fairest way to do that is via marketpricing. Fifth, let's implementtruly open skies, by dropping the anachronistic protectionism that still treats airlines as different from othercompetitive industries. In otherwords, remove the restrictions on foreign ownership, so as to permit the emergence oftruly globalcarriers with access to global capital markets. And yes, thatwill ultimately mean removing restrictions on cabotage.
§ 36.35 Unattended property. ( a ) Leaving any snowmachine, vessel, off-road vehicle or other personal property unattended for longer than 12 months without the prior permission of the Refuge Manager is prohibited, and any property so left may be impounded by the Refuge Manager.
( b ) The Refuge Manager may ( 1 ) designate areas where personal property may not be left unattended for any time period,
( 2 ) establish limits on the amount and type of personal property that may be left unattended,
( 3 ) prescribed the manner in which personal property may be left unattended or
( 4 ) establish limits on the length of time personal property may be left unattended.
( c ) Such designations and restrictions arising under paragraph (b) of this section shall be ( 1 ) published in at least one newspaper of general circulation within the State, posted at community post offices within the affected vicinity, made available for broadcast on local radio stations in a manner reasonably calculated to inform residents in the affected community, and designated in a map which shall be available for public inspection at the office of the Refuge Manager, or
( 2 ) designated by the posting of appropriate signs or
( 3 ) both.
( d ) In the event unattended property interferes with the safe and orderly management of a refuge area or causes damage to refuge resources, it may be impounded by the Refuge Manager at any time.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0664

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

TANYA TWOTEETH,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including January 5, 2024, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

October 31 2023

10/31/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0664
#### § 296.15 Judicial review.

Any claimant or other person who is aggrieved by a final determination may, no later than 30 days after the determination, seek judicial review of the determination in the United States District Court for such judicial district as may be mutually agreeable to the parties concerned or, if no agreement can be reached, in the United States District Court for the judicial district in which the claimant's home port is located.
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH 

	NO. 2-06-232-CV

PAUL S. WRIGHT	APPELLANT	

	V.

ABRINA A. WRIGHT	APPELLEE

	----------

	FROM THE 233RD DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

	----------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

	----------

	On September 15, 2006, we notified appellant that his brief did not conform with Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 38.1(d), (f), (h), and (j) and rule 9.4(h).  We allowed appellant until October 5, 2006 to file an amended brief.  On November 14, 2006, we notified appellant that his amended brief had not been filed as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a).  TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a).  We stated we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal.  We have not received any response.

	Because appellant’s brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.  See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b).

	Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

								PER CURIAM 		

PANEL D:  WALKER, J.; CAYCE, C.J.; and MCCOY, J.

DELIVERED:  December 7, 2006
# EUR-Lex - 11994N041 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11994N041

**ACT concerning the conditions of accession of the Kingdom of Norway, the Republic of Austria, the Republic of Finland and the Kingdom of Sweden and the adjustments to the Treaties on which the European Union is founded - PART FOUR : TRANSITIONAL MEASURES - TITLE II : TRANSITIONAL MEASURES CONCERNING NORWAY - CHAPTER 3 : Fisheries - Section II : Access to waters and resources - Subsection I : Norwegian vessels - Article 41 **

*
Official Journal C 241 , 29/08/1994 P. 0029 *

Article 41

Upon the date of accession and until the date of application of the Community fishing permit system, Norwegian vessels shall be authorized to fish in waters falling under the sovereignty or within the jurisdiction of the Member States of the Union as at present constituted, in ICES Divisions II a, III a (Skagerrak) (1) and IV, under conditions identical to those applicable immediately prior to the entry into force of the Accession Treaty and as laid down by the relevant provisions of Council Regulation (EC) No 3691/93.
§ 665.250 Closed seasons. ( a ) Lobster fishing is prohibited in Permit Area 1 during the months of January through June, inclusive.
( b ) Lobster fishing is prohibited in Permit Area 2 during the months of May, June, July, and August.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of WNC Housing Tax Credit Fund VI, L.P., Series 7 (the “Partnership”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), and pursuant to 18 U.S.C., section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Wilfred N. Cooper, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc., general partner of the Partnership, hereby certify that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.











/s/ WILFRED N. COOPER, JR.


Wilfred N. Cooper, Jr.


President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.


Date:  ­­­October 4, 2010
# EUR-Lex - 12005SP044 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12005SP044

**Protocol concerning the conditions and arrangements for admission of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania to the European Union - PART FIVE:PROVISIONS RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THIS PROTOCOL - TITLE I:SETTING UP OF THE INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES - Article 44 **

*
Official Journal L 157 , 21/06/2005 P. 0042 - 0042 *

Article 44

The Council shall make such adaptations to its Rules of Procedure as are rendered necessary by accession.

--------------------------------------------------
P. 1 

# OAR Box 1875 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 16 ) I I-E-34 Docket Number: 

# A-90-1 9

Printed 12/1/200811:12:44 AM

Sheet 16 of 86P. 2 

## „ A-90-1 9 1 IX,D. v : 

## * > •ll-E-3 4 JAC A Corp . DE C 1 8 199 2 55 0 Pinetow n Rd . ';._..,_„ ——» : „ Ft . Washington , P A1903 4 \ ErA/ur:_-^_„ . 215/643-546 6 Fax : 215/643-2772 % '

Project Name : HO

N Perso n Contacted/Title : Phon e Number : Compan y Representing : JAC ARepresentative : Discussion : I c

a The 

# Telephon e Log

Mar k Gri m 1-914-357-255 0 Unio n Carbid e Christophe rHolme

s lie d Unio n Carbid e t o obtai n pric e quote d fo r5

0 percen t dehyd e wa

s $5.6 0 pe rkilogram .

• Date : Time : Projec t No. :
Fax : * • s ^

Fehn.a r y

7ft. 1QQ 9 01430 8

Dric e quote s fo rGluteraldehvde . reaqen t tech n ica l qrad e qluteral -
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 189 (Friday, September 29, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57488-57489]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-8357]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army; Corps of Engineers


Intent To Convey the ``Drum Stick'' Parcel of the Former Fort 
Ord, Located in Monterey County, CA in Return for the ``Stillwell 
Kidney'' Parcel Owned by the City of Seaside

AGENCY: Department of the Army, U.S. Army, U.S. Army Corps of 
Engineers, DoD.

ACTION: Notice of intent.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to 10 U.S.C. 2869(d)(1) the Department of the Army 
(Army) is providing notice of its intent to convey the ``Drum Stick'' 
parcel of the former Fort Ord, located in Monterey County, CA in return 
for the ``Stillwell Kidney'' parcel owned by the City of Seaside. Fort 
Ord was selected for closure by the Base Realignment and Closure 
Commission in 1991. The Drum Stick parcel is an undeveloped, densely-
vegetated 11.28-acre property adjacent to California State Route 1 on 
the former Fort Ord. the Stillwell Kidney parcel currently contains 
approximately 400 abandoned housing units. Under 10 U.S.C. 2869, the 
Army is authorized to enter into an agreement to convey real property, 
including any improvements thereon, located on a military installation 
that is closed or realigned under a Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) 
Act to any person who agrees to convey to the Army real property of at

[[Page 57489]]

least equal value. The Army has concluded that the Stillwell Kidney 
parcel has a fair market value that is at least equal to that of the 
Drum Stick parcel.

ADDRESSES: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Norfolk District, ATTN: CENAO-
CO, 803 Front Street, Norfolk, VA 23510-1096.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Todd Waldman, Esquire, (757) 201-7202.

    Dated: September 21, 2006.
Joseph R. Loschi,
District Counsel.
[FR Doc. 06-8357 Filed 9-28-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-EN-M
###### Editorial Note on Part 622

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 622 appear at 79 FR 57837, Sept. 26, 2014 and at 81 FR 32253, May 23, 2016.

#### § 622.514 Area and seasonal closures.

(a) *Closures applicable to specific areas* —

(1) *Grammanik Bank.* The Grammanik Bank is bounded by rhumb lines connecting, in order, the points listed in Table 1 to this paragraph (a)(1).

(i) From February 1 through April 30, each year, no person may fish for or possess any species of fish, except highly migratory species, in or from the Grammanik Bank. The prohibition on possession does not apply to such fish harvested and landed ashore prior to the closure. For the purpose of this paragraph (a)(1)(i), *fish* means finfish, mollusks, crustaceans, and all other forms of marine animal and plant life other than marine mammals and birds. *Highly migratory species* means bluefin, bigeye, yellowfin, albacore, and skipjack tunas; swordfish; sharks (listed in appendix A to part 635 of this title); and white marlin, blue marlin, sailfish, and longbill spearfish.

(ii) Fishing with pots, traps, bottom longlines, gillnets or trammel nets is prohibited year-round in the Grammanik Bank.

| Point | North lat. | West long. |
| --- | --- | --- |
| A | 18°11.898′ | 64°56.328′ |
| B | 18°11.645′ | 64°56.225′ |
| C | 18°11.058′ | 64°57.810′ |
| D | 18°11.311′ | 64°57.913′ |
| A | 18°11.898′ | 64°56.328′ |

Table 1 to § 622.514(a)(1)—Grammanik Bank

(2) *Hind Bank Marine Conservation District (MCD).* The Hind Bank MCD is bounded by rhumb lines connecting, in order, the points listed in Table 2 to this paragraph (a)(2). Fishing for any species and anchoring by fishing vessels is prohibited year-round in those parts of the Hind Bank MCD that are in the EEZ around St. Thomas and St. John.

| Point | North lat. | West long. |
| --- | --- | --- |
| A | 18°13.2′ | 65°06.0′ |
| B | 18°13.2′ | 64°59.0′ |
| C | 18°11.8′ | 64°59.0′ |
| D | 18°10.7′ | 65°06.0′ |
| A | 18°13.2′ | 65°06.0′ |

Table 2 to § 622.514(a)(2)—Hind Bank MCD

(b) *Seasonal closures applicable to specific species* —

(1) *Black, red, tiger, yellowedge, and yellowfin grouper closure.* From February 1 through April 30, each year, no person may fish for or possess black, red, tiger, yellowedge, or yellowfin grouper in or from the EEZ around St. Thomas and St. John. The prohibition on possession does not apply to such grouper harvested and landed ashore prior to the closure.

(2) *Black, blackfin, silk, and vermilion snapper closure.* From October 1 through December 31, each year, no person may fish for or possess black, blackfin, silk, or vermilion snapper in or from the EEZ around St. Thomas and St. John. The prohibition on possession does not apply to such snapper harvested and landed ashore prior to the closure.

(3) *Lane and mutton snapper closure.* From April 1 through June 30, each year, no person may fish for or possess lane or mutton snapper in or from the EEZ around St. Thomas and St. John. The prohibition on possession does not apply to such snapper harvested and landed ashore prior to the closure.