alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EUR-Lex - 11992MK01 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11992MK01

**Treaty on European Union - Title VI: Provisions on cooperation in the fields of justice and home affairs - Article K.1 **

*
Official Journal C 191 , 29/07/1992 P. 0061 *

Article K.1

For the purposes of achieving the objectives of the Union, in particular the free movement of persons, and without prejudice to the powers of the European Community, Member States shall regard the following areas as matters of common interest:

1. asylum policy;

2. rules governing the crossing by persons of the external borders of the Member States and the exercise of controls thereon;

3. immigration policy and policy regarding nationals of third countries:

(a) conditions of entry and movement by nationals of third countries on the territory of Member States;

(b) conditions of residence by nationals of third countries on the territory of Member States, including family reunion and access to employment;

(c) combatting unauthorized immigration, residence and work by nationals of third countries on the territory of Member States;

4. combatting drug addiction in so far as this is not covered by 7 to 9;

5. combatting fraud on an international scale in so far as this is not covered by 7 to 9;

6. judicial cooperation in civil matters;

7. judicial cooperation in criminal matters;

8. customs cooperation;

9. police cooperation for the purposes of preventing and combatting terrorism, unlawful drug trafficking and other serious forms of international crime, including if necessary certain aspects of customs cooperation, in connection with the organization of a Union-wide system for exchanging information within a European Police Office (Europol).
No. 11-301.

#### Saint-Gobain Ceramics & Plastics, Inc. *v.*Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.

C. A. Fed. Cir. Certio-rari denied.
[4910-13-P'

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT ATlON Federal Aviation Administration

RlN 2120-AA64 Airworthiness Directivesj Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A. ERJ 170 and ERJ 190Airplanes AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department ofTransportation (DOT). ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: We are superseding an existing airv,,'orthiness directive (AD) for the products listed above. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MeAl) originated by an aviation authority ofanother country to identify and correct anunsafe condition on an aviation product. The MeAl forEI\.1BRAER Model ERJ 170 airplanes describes the unsafe condition as: Ithas been found the occurrence ofan engine in-flight shutdown caused bythe LPCV [low pressure check valves] failing to close due to excessive wear, which leads to the concern that such fault may be present in both engines ofagiven aircraft. "ClJRIlP.l<CF.S "O\fT'NG WMOOc 

## Afl/'1-r 1l<ITrAL.5JSIG 

## ('C~

INJTlAl.sIS'G

''''T'ALSi,IG ~",M"li----



## * * 

### * 

## * * * 

## *

INJ 1JAI.s'S'G
Exhibit








EXHIBIT 10.3
        
AMENDMENT NO. 1
to the
AMENDED AND RESTATED
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


         
AMENDMENT (“Amendment No. 1”) dated June 17, 2020, and made effective as of the 29th day of March 2020 (the “Effective Date”), by and between Ralph Lauren Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and Jane Nielsen (the “Executive”).


WHEREAS, the Executive currently serves as the Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Office and Chief Financial Officer of the Company pursuant to an Amended and Restated Employment Agreement by and between the Company and the Executive made effective as of March 31, 2019 (the “Employment Agreement”); and 


WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive wish to amend the Employment Agreement in certain respects; 


NOW, THEREFORE, intending to be bound, the parties hereby agree as follows. 


1.Section 2.1(e)(A) of the Employment Agreement is amended to add the following parenthetical after the words “annual bonus percentage” effective as of the Effective Date: 


“(except with respect to a reduction in the maximum bonus percentage for the Company’s Fiscal 2021)”
 
2.Except as specifically amended and/or modified by this Amendment No.1, the Employment Agreement is hereby ratified and confirmed and all other terms of the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect, unaltered and unchanged by this Amendment No. 1. 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment No. 1 to be duly executed and the Executive has hereunto set her hand on the date first set forth above, as of the Effective Date.        


RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION


By: /s/ ROSEANN LYNCH
Roseann Lynch, Executive Vice President, Chief People Officer                                       
       
EXECUTIVE


/s/ JANE HAMILTON NIELSEN
Jane Nielsen




1
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

AUGUST 24, 2009

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 08-16130

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 06-00476-CR-TCB-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DAVID LEROY WHITE,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Georgia

_________________________

(August 24, 2009)

Before CARNES, WILSON and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Richard A. Grossman, appointed counsel for David Leroy White in this
direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the

appellant and filed a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738,

87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Because independent examination of the

entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is

GRANTED, and White’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

2
Exhibit 4
Form 10-KSB
Reddi Brakes Supply Company, Inc.

                      ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT
                             TO THE
                    ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
                               OF
                  WESCO AUTO PARTS CORPORATION

     Pursuant to the applicable provisions of the Nevada Business

Corporations Act, WESCO AUTO PARTS CORPORATION (the

"Corporation") adopts the following Articles of Amendment to its

Articles of Incorporation by stating the following:

     FIRST:    The present name of the corporation is Wesco Auto

Parts Corporation.

     SECOND:   The following amendment to its Articles of

Incorporation was adopted by majority vote of shareholders of the

corporation on November 22, 1993 in the manner prescribed by

Nevada law:

     1.   The first sentence of Article IV is amended to read as

          follows:

                           ARTICLE IV
                          CAPITAL STOCK

          The aggregate number of shares which this
     corporation shall have authority to issue is:  Thirty
     Five Million (35,000,000) shares of $.0001 par value
     each, which shares shall be designated "Common Stock";
     and Two Million Five Hundred Thousand (2,500,000)
     shares of $.0001 par value each, which shares shall be
     designated "Preferred Stock" and which may be issued in
     one or more series at the discretion of the Board of
     Directors.

     THIRD:    The number of shares of the Corporation
outstanding and entitled

to vote at the time of the adoption of said amendment was
16,261,148.

     FOURTH:   The number of shares which voted for such
amendment was

 8,270,836, which constitutes over 50% of the total voting
power of the Corporation's

stockholders.

     DATED:    November 24, 1993

                              WESCO AUTO PARTS CORPORATION
                              By: /s/ Allen J. Sheerin,
President
                              By: /s/ Michael J. Cassidy,
Secretary

                              E-14
<PAGE>
Exhibit 35.1

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

Chase Bank USA,
National Association

Chase Credit Card Master Trust

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Chase Bank USA, National Association (the Bank), as Servicer pursuant to the Fifth Amended and Restated Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as
of December 19, 2007 (as amended and supplemented from time to time, the Agreement) between the Bank, as transferor and servicer (in such capacity, the Servicer) and The Bank of New York Mellon, as trustee, does hereby
certify that:



| | 1. | The Bank is, as of the date hereof, the Servicer under the Agreement.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | A review of the Servicers activities during the calendar year ended December 31, 2009 (the Reporting Period) and of its performance under the
Agreement has been made under my supervision.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 3. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the
Reporting Period.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this certificate this 29th day of March 2010.



CHASE BANK USA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as ServicerBy:

/s/ Keith W. SchuckName:

Keith W. SchuckTitle:

President
# EUR-Lex - 11992M/PRO/IME/00 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11992M/PRO/IME/00

**Treaty on European Union - Protocol on the statute of the European Monetary Institute **

*
Official Journal C 191 , 29/07/1992 P. 0079 *

PROTOCOL on the Statute of the European Monetary Institute

THE HIGH CONTRACTING PARTIES,

DESIRING to lay down the Statute of the European Monetary Institute,

HAVE AGREED upon the following provisions, which shall be annexed to the Treaty establishing the European Community:
2 CFR § 1134.140 Performance reporting procedures. 

[Full text available at https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2020-08-19/pdf/2020-16414.pdf] 

(a) Requirement. A DoD Component’s general terms and conditions must inform recipients 

about performance reporting procedures. 

(b) Award terms and conditions. To implement the requirement of paragraph (a) of this section, a 

DoD Component in its general terms and conditions must insert wording in Section F of REP 

Article I (which is reserved in the template for REP Article I that appendix A to this part 

provides), to specify: 

(1) The office or offices to which a recipient must submit its interim and final 

performance reports, any requests in due dates for those reports, and any reports of significant 

developments; and 

(2) How the recipient is to submit those reports and requests (e.g., email or other 

electronic submission method). 

(3) For research awards, component must assure that the recipient final report complies 

with the distribution and marking requirements of DoD Manual 3200.14, Volume 1. This 

includes the requirement that all significant scientific or technological findings, 

recommendations, and results derived from DoD endeavors—which shall include the final 

performance report at a minimum—are recorded and provided to Defense Technical 

Information Center (DTIC). Follow guidance in (b)(1) to inform recipients as the submission 

and distribution requirements (i.e. Component may choose to receive the report and submit to 

DTIC themselves or provide instructions to recipient on submission to DTIC). 

(4) Access to Research Results 

(i) For purposes of this term and condition, the following definition applies: Final 

Peer-Reviewed Manuscript: The final version of a peer-reviewed article for a 

professional journal publication disclosing the results of scientific research which is 

authored or coauthored by the recipient or funded, in whole or in part, with funds from a 

DoD award, that includes all modifications from the publishing peer review process, and 

all graphics and supplemental material associated with the article. 

(ii) The recipient shall ensure that any Final Peer-Reviewed Manuscript is 

submitted to the Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC) repository, currently at 

www.dtic.mil. Ensure that the Final Peer-Reviewed Manuscript is submitted when it is 

accepted for publication, and when the final title and date of publication are known.
# EUR-Lex - 12004V/AFI/DCL/36 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V/AFI/DCL/36

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - FINAL ACT - B. Declarations concerning Protocols annexed to the Constitution - Declarations concerning the Protocol on the Treaty and the Act of Accession of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia and the Slovak Republic - 36.Declaration on the transit of persons by land between the region of Kaliningrad and other parts of the Russian Federation **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0468 - 0468 *

36. Declaration on the transit of persons by land between the region of Kaliningrad and other parts of the Russian Federation

THE CONFERENCE,

Considering the particular situation of the Kaliningrad region of the Russian Federation in the context of the Union's enlargement;

Recognising the obligations and commitments of Lithuania with regard to the acquis establishing an area of freedom, security and justice;

Noting, in particular, that Lithuania shall fully apply and implement the Union acquis regarding the list of countries whose nationals must be in possession of visas when crossing the external borders and those whose nationals are exempt from that requirement as well the Union acquis regarding the uniform format for a visa as from accession at the latest;

Recognising that the transit of persons by land between the region of Kaliningrad and other parts of the Russian Federation through Union territory is a matter concerning the Union as a whole and should be treated as such and must not entail any unfavourable consequence for Lithuania;

Considering the decision to be taken by the Council to remove controls at internal borders after it has verified that the necessary conditions to that effect have been met;

Determined to assist Lithuania in fulfilling the conditions for full participation in the Schengen area without internal frontiers as soon as possible,

Points out that specific provisions to that end have been included in Title V of Part Two of the Protocol on the Treaty and Act of Accession of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia and the Slovak Republic.

--------------------------------------------------
On petitioners’ petition for reconsideration filed November 24, 1993,

reconsideration allowed; decision (124 Or App 678, 865 P2d 1341 (1993)) withdrawn; reversed and remanded for reconsideration January 26, 1994

#### In the Matter of the Compensation of Jerome A. Young, Claimant. ITT HARTFORD INSURANCE GROUP and Fleetwood of Oregon, *Petitioners, v.*Jerome A. YOUNG; Milgard Manufacturing, Inc.; Kemper Insurance Company; and Lumberman’s Mutual, *Respondents.*

(91-04933, 91-01167, 92-01499; CA A79279)

866 P2d 524

John D. Ostrander, Tooze Shenker Duden and Creamer Frank & Hutchison for the petition.

Darrell E. Bewley and Estell & Bewley *contra.*

Before Rossman, Presiding Judge, and De Muniz and Leeson, Judges.

ROSSMAN, P. J.

*119ROSSMAN, P. J.

Relying on our opinion in *SAIF v. Drews,*117 Or App 596, 845 P2d 217 (1993), which interpreted ORS 656.308, we affirmed without opinion the Workers’ Compensation Board’s order in this case holding that Milgard Manufacturing, Inc., had established that claimant’s employment at Fleetwood of Oregon was a material contributing cause of his condition and that his condition was therefore the responsibility of Fleetwood. 124 Or App 678, 865 P2d 1341 (1993). The Supreme Court reversed our decision in *SAIF v. Drews,*318 Or 1, 860 P2d 254 (1993), holding that, in order to shift responsibility to a subsequent employer under ORS 656.308, the last employer with an accepted claim has the burden to show that the subsequent employment is the major contributing cause of the condition. In the light of that reversal, Fleetwood seeks reconsideration of our decision. We allow reconsideration, withdraw our decision, and remand the case to the Board.

Here, the Board affirmed and adopted the referee’s order, which said:

> “Although the standard is materiality, I will state that a major contributing cause standard *might lead to a different result.*Remembering that the initial employer has the burden of proof, I would find the evidence relatively evenly balanced concerning whether Milgard or Fleetwood were *[sic]*the major contributing cause of claimant’s condition * * (Emphasis supplied.)

We remand this case to the Board for it to consider whether, under the major contributing cause standard, responsibility for claimant’s compensable back condition shifts to Fleetwood.

Reconsideration allowed; decision withdrawn; reversed and remanded for reconsideration.
Exhibit 4.1


 





Alaia Capital, LLC


10 Corbin Drive


Darien, Connecticut 06820


 


July 28, 2020


 


m+ Buffer 20 Fund, m+ funds Trust, Series 1-12


c/o The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee


2 Hanson Place, 12th Floor


Brooklyn, New York 11217


 


		Re:	m+ funds Trust, Series 1-12 (the “Trust”)



 


 


Ladies and Gentlemen:


 


We have examined Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement
(File No. 333-238106) for the above captioned Trust. We hereby consent to the use in the Registration Statement of the references
to Alaia Capital, LLC as evaluator.


 


You are hereby authorized to file a copy
of this letter with the Securities and Exchange Commission.


 


 


 


	 	Very truly yours,	 
	 	 	 
	 	Alaia Capital, LLC	 
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Oscar Loynaz	 
	 	 	Name: Oscar Loynaz	 
	 	 	Title:  Managing Director
# EUR-Lex - 12004V/AFI/DCL/31 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V/AFI/DCL/31

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - FINAL ACT - B. Declarations concerning Protocols annexed to the Constitution - Declarations concerning the Protocol on the Treaties and Acts of Accession of the Kingdom of Denmark, Ireland and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, of the Hellenic Republic, of the Kingdom of Spain and the Portuguese Republic, and of the Republic of Austria, the Republic of Finland and the Kingdom of Sweden - 31.Declaration on the Åland islands **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0465 - 0465 *

31. Declaration on the Åland islands

The Conference acknowledges that the regime applicable to the Åland islands, referred to in Article IV-440(5), is established taking into account the special status that these islands enjoy under international law.

To that end, the Conference stresses that specific provisions have been included in Section 5 of Title V of the Protocol on the Treaties and Acts of Accession of the Kingdom of Denmark, Ireland and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, of the Hellenic Republic, of the Kingdom of Spain and the Portuguese Republic, and of the Republic of Austria, the Republic of Finland and the Kingdom of Sweden.

--------------------------------------------------
# EUR-Lex - 11957A178 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11957A178

**TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN ATOMIC ENERGY COMMUNITY ( E.A.E.C. - EURATOM ), TITLE FOUR - FINANCIAL PROVISIONS, ARTICLE 178 **

*

*

++++

ARTICLE 178

IF , AT THE BEGINNING OF A FINANCIAL YEAR , THE OPERATING BUDGET HAS NOT YET BEEN VOTED , A SUM EQUIVALENT TO NOT MORE THAN ONE TWELFTH OF THE BUDGET APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE PRECEDING FINANCIAL YEAR MAY BE SPENT EACH MONTH IN RESPECT OF ANY CHAPTER OR OTHER SUBDIVISION OF THE BUDGET IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THE REGULATIONS MADE PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 183 ; THIS ARRANGEMENT SHALL NOT , HOWEVER , HAVE THE EFFECT OF PLACING AT THE DISPOSAL OF THE COMMISSION APPROPRIATIONS IN EXCESS OF ONE TWELFTH OF THOSE PROVIDED FOR IN THE DRAFT BUDGET IN COURSE OF PREPARATION .

IF , AT THE BEGINNING OF A FINANCIAL YEAR , THE RESEARCH AND INVESTMENT BUDGET HAS NOT YET BEEN VOTED , A SUM EQUIVALENT TO NOT MORE THAN ONE TWELFTH OF THE APPROPRIATIONS CORRESPONDING TO THE ANNUAL ESTIMATES SHOWN IN THE SCHEDULE OF DUE DATES FOR PAYMENTS RELATING TO COMMITMENT APPROPRIATIONS ALREADY APPROVED MAY BE SPENT EACH MONTH IN RESPECT OF ANY CHAPTER OR OTHER SUBDIVISION OF THE BUDGET IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THE REGULATIONS MADE PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 183 .

THE COUNCIL MAY , ACTING BY A QUALIFIED MAJORITY , PROVIDED THAT THE OTHER CONDITIONS LAID DOWN IN THE FIRST AND SECOND PARAGRAPH ARE OBSERVED , AUTHORISE EXPENDITURE IN EXCESS OF ONE TWELFTH , SUBJECT TO THE LIMITS RESULTING FROM PROGRAMMES OR DECISIONS INVOLVING EXPENDITURE WHICH , IN PURSUANCE OF THIS TREATY , REQUIRE THE UNANIMOUS APPROVAL OF THE COUNCIL .

MEMBER STATES SHALL PAY EVERY MONTH , ON A PROVISIONAL BASIS AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SCALES LAID DOWN FOR THE PRECEDING FINANCIAL YEAR , THE AMOUNTS NECESSARY TO ENSURE APPLICATION OF THIS ARTICLE .
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5 the Court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under

the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

January 20, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-10272

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

TYRAY ANTWON DRONES, also known as 

Tyray Antwoon Drones,

Defendant-Appellant.

 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:02-CR-64-1-Y

 

Before GARWOOD, DEMOSS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Tyray Antwon Drones pleaded guilty to assault of a federal law

enforcement agent causing bodily injury in violation of 18 U.S.C.

§ 111. Drones argues that the district court erred in applying

U.S.S.G. § 2A2.2, the aggravated assault guideline, to determine

his base offense level. Drones further argues that the district
2

court erred in enhancing his sentence pursuant to § 2A2.2(b)(2)(C)

on the ground that the use of a dangerous weapon had been

threatened.

This court reviews the district court’s findings of fact at

sentencing for clear error and its application of the sentencing

guidelines de novo. United States v. Anderson, 174 F.3d 515, 524

(5th Cir. 1999). Because Drones’s assault involved both the

presence of a dangerous weapon, Michael Duncan’s service firearm,

and the intent to cause bodily injury with that weapon, the

district court did not clearly err in finding that his offense

constituted aggravated assault. See § 2A2.2, comment. (n.1). The

district court could (and did) properly infer Drones’s intent to do

bodily harm with Duncan’s firearm from Drones’s actions – lunging

at Duncan, hitting Duncan about the head, and grabbing Duncan’s

firearm with both hands in an attempt to gain control of the

weapon, in addition to Drones’s initial attack upon Steven Steele.

See United States v. Morris, 131 F.3d 1136, 1138 (5th Cir. 1997).

Although Drones disputes the district court’s finding that he

attempted to wrestle the firearm away from Duncan, he has failed to

produce any evidence to the contrary to demonstrate that the

presentence report was inaccurate. See United States v. Brown, 54

F.3d 234, 242 (5th Cir. 1995); United States v. Lage, 183 F.3d 374,

383 (5th Cir. 1995). Thus, applying § 2A2.2 to set the base

offense level was proper. Because Drones threatened the use of a
3

dangerous weapon by attempting to gain control of Duncan’s firearm,

the district court did not err in enhancing Drones’s sentence in

accordance with § 2A2.2(b)(2)(C).

AFFIRMED.