alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EUR-Lex - 12004V/AFI/DCL/05 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V/AFI/DCL/05

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - FINAL ACT - A.Declarations concerning provisions of the Constitution - 5.Declaration on Article I-25 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0421 - 0422 *

5. Declaration on Article I-25

The Conference declares that the European decision relating to the implementation of Article I-25 will be adopted by the Council on the day the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe enters into force. The draft decision is set out below:

DRAFT EUROPEAN DECISION OF THE COUNCIL RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ARTICLE I-25

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Whereas:

(1) Provisions should be adopted allowing for a smooth transition from the system for decision-making in the Council by a qualified majority as defined in the Treaty of Nice and set out in Article 2(2) of the Protocol on the transitional provisions relating to the institutions and bodies of the Union annexed to the Constitution, which will continue to apply until 31 October 2009, to the voting system provided for in Article I-25 of the Constitution, which will apply with effect from 1 November 2009.

(2) It is recalled that it is the practice of the Council to devote every effort to strengthening the democratic legitimacy of decisions taken by a qualified majority.

(3) It is judged appropriate to maintain this decision as long as is necessary to ensure smooth transition to the new voting system provided for in the Constitution,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

If members of the Council, representing:

(a) at least three quarters of the population; or

(b) at least three quarters of the number of Member States.

necessary to constitute a blocking minority resulting from the application of Article I-25(1), first subparagraph, or Article I-25(2), indicate their opposition to the Council adopting an act by a qualified majority, the Council shall discuss the issue.

Article 2

The Council shall, in the course of these discussions, do all in its power to reach, within a reasonable time and without prejudicing obligatory time limits laid down by Union law, a satisfactory solution to address concerns raised by the members of the Council referred to in Article 1.

Article 3

To this end, the President of the Council, with the assistance of the Commission and in compliance with the Rules of Procedure of the Council, shall undertake any initiative necessary to facilitate a wider basis of agreement in the Council. The members of the Council shall lend him or her their assistance.

Article 4

This decision shall take effect on 1 November 2009. It shall remain in force at least until 2014. Thereafter the Council may adopt a European decision repealing it.

--------------------------------------------------
1 In The



### Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

_________________

NO. 09

- 18

- 00 441

- CV



### _________________

IN RE THE STRONG FIRM, P.C.

________________________________________________________________________

Original Proceeding

418 th District Court of Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 17

- 05

- 05631

- CV

________________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

T he r eal parties in interest, Christopher Adams and Swiss CNC, LLC , filed a

motion to dismiss this original proceeding because the underlying case settled. The

r elator, The Strong Firm, P.C.

, agreed with the motion to dismiss the original

proceeding . The motion is granted, and we dismiss this original proceeding without

reference to the mer its.

PETITION DISMISS ED

.

PER CURIAM2 Submitted on December 19, 2018

Opinion Delivered December 20, 2018

Before McKeithen , C.J., Kreger, and Horton, JJ.
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

Roderick Undrea Williams, Appellant

No. 06-14-00028-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 8th District Court of 

Hopkins County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 

1323472). Memorandum Opinion 

delivered by Justice Moseley, Chief Justice 

Morriss and Justice Carter participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that the personal letter of the 

appellant requesting dismissal of his appeal should be granted. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal.

We note that the appellant, Roderick Undrea Williams, has adequately indicated his 

inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED September 3, 2014

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
Exhibit 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

Subsidiary

State or Country of Incorporation or OrganizationArthroCare (Australasia) Pty Ltd. f/k/a TiMax Surgical Pty Ltd.


AustraliaArthroCare (Deutschland) AG f/k/a ArthroCare (Deutschland) GmbH


GermanyArthroCare (Hong Kong) Limited


Hong KongARTHROCARE CANADA LIMITED


CanadaArthroCare Corporation Cayman Islands


Cayman IslandsArthroCare Costa Rica, S.R.L.


Costa RicaArthroCare Europe AB


SwedenArthroCare France SARL


FranceArthroCare Luxembourg, S.`a.r.l.


LuxembourgArthroCare Medical Corporation


NevadaARTHROCARE SCANDINAVIA ApS
f/k/a Ortoconcept ApS


AustriaARTHROCARE SIGNAPORE PTE. LTD.


SingaporeArthroCare UK Limited f/k/a ATLANTECH MEDICAL DEVICES LIMITED


United KingdomAtlantech Medical Devices (UK) Limited


EnglandAtlantech Medizinische Produkte Vertiebs-GmbH


AustriaDevice Reimbursement Services, Inc.


NevadaDiscoCare, Inc.


DelawareMedical Device Alliance, Inc.


NevadaOC Acquisition Sub, LLC


California


---



QuickLinks
Editorial Note on Part 648
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 648 appear at 62 FR 14651, Mar. 27, 1997.

§ 648.150 Block Island Sound Transit Zone. ( a ) Vessels not issued a black sea bass Federal moratorium or party/charter permit, and recreational fishing participants fishing exclusively in state waters may transit with black sea bass harvested from state waters on board through Federal waters of the EEZ within Block Island Sound, north of a line connecting Montauk Light, Montauk Point, NY, and Block Island Southeast Light, Block Island, RI; and west of a line connecting Point Judith Light, Point Judith, RI, and Block Island Southeast Light, Block Island, RI. Within this area, possession of black sea bass is permitted regardless of the minimum and/or maximum (as applicable) size, possession limit, and seasons outlined in §§ 648.145, 648.146, and 648.147, provided no fishing takes place from the vessel while in Federal waters of the EEZ, the vessel complies with state regulations, and is in continuous transit. During such transit through this area, commercial gear must be stowed in accordance with the definition of “not available for immediate use” found at § 648.2, and party/charter vessels and recreational participants must have all bait and hooks removed from fishing rods, and any black sea bass on board must be stored in a cooler or container.
( b ) The requirements of this transit zone are not necessary or applicable for recreational fishery participants during years when conservation equivalency has been adopted under conservation equivalency measures and recreational Federal measures are waived.
[84 FR 65705, Nov. 29, 2019]
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.1


                          Hollinger International Inc.
                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
                       As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906
                        of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



         In connection with the annual report of Hollinger International Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Gordon A. Paris, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



         1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company.



         Date: March 31, 2006



                                              /s/ Gordon A. Paris
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Name:  Gordon A. Paris
                                              Title: Chairman and President
                                                     and Chief Executive Officer


         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Hollinger International Inc. and will be retained by Hollinger
International Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
# EUR-Lex - 12004V016 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V016

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART I - TITLE III — UNION COMPETENCES - Article I-16 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0017 - 0017 *

Article I-16

The common foreign and security policy

1. The Union's competence in matters of common foreign and security policy shall cover all areas of foreign policy and all questions relating to the Union's security, including the progressive framing of a common defence policy that might lead to a common defence.

2. Member States shall actively and unreservedly support the Union's common foreign and security policy in a spirit of loyalty and mutual solidarity and shall comply with the Union's action in this area. They shall refrain from action contrary to the Union's interests or likely to impair its effectiveness.

--------------------------------------------------
## THE STATE OF TEXAS MANDATE

TO THE 188TH DISTRIC T COURT OF GREGG COU NTY, GREETINGS: Before the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 6th day of May, A.D. 2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your Judgment was determined;
and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

Sylvester Kelly, Appellant

v. The State of Texas, Appellee No. 06

- 12

- 00141

- CR
Trial Court No. 41,078

- A

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court
below

. We affirm the judgment of the trial court. We note that the appellant, Sylvester Kelly, has adequately indicated his inability to pay costs of appeal. The refore, we waive payment of costs. WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court in this behalf, and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed. WITNESS, the Hon. Josh R. Morriss, III, Chief Justice of our said Court of Appeals, with the seal thereof annexed, at the City of Texarkana, this the 13th day of July , A.D. 2015

.

DEBRA K. AUTREY , Clerk
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                                  5
<MULTIPLIER>                                               1

<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                     Jan-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                       Dec-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                    1
<CASH>                                                       448,000
<SECURITIES>                                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                457,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                                    8,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                             913,000
<PP&E>                                                     3,560,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                             2,300,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                             2,225,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                        726,000
<BONDS>                                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                              0
<PREFERRED>                                                        0
<COMMON>                                                      75,000
<OTHER-SE>                                                 1,424,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                               1,499,000
<SALES>                                                    1,255,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                           1,685,000
<CGS>                                                              0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                861,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                             740,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                             1,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                               83,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                           83,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                    0
<CHANGES>                                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                                  83,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                    .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                      0



</TABLE>
30 June 2012

Richard Payton

8P

- AR

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region VIII

1595 Wynkoop Street

Denver, CO 80202

- 1129

Dear Richard :

Enclosed is the Exceptional Event report for the high wind/blowing dust event that occurred on April 3 , 2009 in

Pagosa Springs , Colorado

. Data for this event are flagged on AQS, as required. This report, and the analysis

and data contained within it, clearly shows that this exceptional event passed the four required tests under 40

CFR 50.14 (3)(iv ).

Th is report was made available for public comment on our website from May 30 through June 29 , 201 2 , and

was also distributed to potentially interested parties

. No public comments were received.

We respectfully request a review of this report and concurrence by EPA on this high wind/blowing dust event

.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Sincerely,

Gordon E. Pierce

Program Manager

Technical Services Program

Air Pollution Control Division

cc. D ei rdre Rothery, EPA

Joe Delwiche, EPA

Greg Harshfield, APCD

Pat McGraw, APCD

Pat Reddy, APCD

Terry Furuli, APCD
EXHIBIT 32-1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

          In connection  with the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of WNC Housing
     Tax Credit Fund VI, L.P., Series 7 (the "Partnership") for the period ended
     September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on
     the date hereof (the "Report"), and pursuant to 18 U.S.C., section 1350, as
     adopted  pursuant  to section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  I,
     Wilfred N. Cooper,  Jr.,  President  and Chief  Executive  Officer of WNC &
     Associates,   Inc.,   general   partner  of  the  General  Partner  of  the
     Partnership, hereby certify that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects,   the  financial  condition  and  result  of  operations  of  the
     Partnership.




/s/WILFRED N. COOPER, JR.
-------------------------
Wilfred N. Cooper, Jr.
President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.
Date:  November 10, 2004
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Drew Bonnell, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Eden Energy Corp.
      for the period ended March 31, 2009 (the "Report") fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934; and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Eden Energy Corp.                                                                 

Dated: May 14, 2009



| | /s/ Drew Bonnell                                           
| | -----------------------------------------------------------
| | Drew
      Bonnell                                         
| | Secretary, Treasurer and CFO                               
| | (Principal Financial Officer and Principal
      Accounting
| | Officer)                                                   
| | Eden Energy Corp.                                          

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise
adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version
of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Eden
Energy Corp. and will be retained by Eden Energy Corp. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
Exhibit 23.01




Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm






We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-26359) pertaining to the Sonic Corp. Savings and Profit Sharing
Plan, Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-131450) pertaining to the Sonic
Corp. 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan, the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.
333-64890) pertaining to the 1991 Sonic Corp. Stock Option Plan, 2001 Sonic
Corp. Stock Option Plan and 2001 Sonic Corp. Directors’ Stock Option Plan, the
Registration Statements (Forms S-8 No. 333-09373, No. 33-40989 and No. 33-78576)
pertaining to the 1991 Sonic Corp. Stock Option Plan, the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 33-40988) pertaining to the 1991 Sonic Corp. Stock Purchase Plan,
the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-40987) pertaining to the 1991 Sonic
Corp. Directors’ Stock Option Plan and the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No.
33-95716) for the registration of 1,420,000 shares of its common stock, and the
related Prospectuses of our reports dated October 29, 2009, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of Sonic Corp. and the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Sonic Corp.,
included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended August 31,
2009.




ERNST
      & YOUNG LLPOklahoma
      City, OklahomaOctober
      29, 2009
§ 635.53 Prior notification. ( a ) U.S. vessels carrying tuna or tuna-like species or other HMS that are seeking to enter the port of another ICCAT contracting or cooperating party must provide to the port State, at least 72 hours before the estimated time of arrival at the port or in accordance with any other time period specified by the foreign government, the following information: ( 1 ) Vessel identification (External identification; Name; Flag State; ICCAT Record No., if any; IMO No., if any; and international radio call sign);
( 2 ) Name of the designated port, as referred to in the ICCAT register, to which it seeks entry and the purpose of the port call;
( 3 ) Fishing authorization or, where appropriate, any other authorization held by the vessel to support fishing operations on ICCAT-managed species and/or fish products originating from such species;
( 4 ) Estimated date and time of arrival in port;
( 5 ) In kilograms, the estimated quantities of each ICCAT-managed species and/or fish products originating from such species to be held on board and to be landed, with associated catch areas;
( 6 ) Other information, as requested by the foreign ICCAT contracting or cooperating non-contracting party, to determine whether a vessel has engaged in IUU fishing, or related activities;
( b ) After receiving information pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section, the foreign ICCAT contracting or cooperating non-contracting party should decide whether to authorize or deny the entry of a vessel into its port.
[79 FR 72559, Dec. 8, 2014]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-4960

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

DONNIE WAYNE BOWMAN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern

District of West Virginia, at Charleston. John T. Copenhaver, Jr.,

District Judge. (CR-04-38)

Submitted: April 19, 2006 Decided: April 28, 2006

Before WILLIAMS and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mary Lou Newberger, Federal Public Defender, Jonathan D. Byrne,

Appellant Counsel, David R. Bungard, Assistant Federal Public

Defender, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellant. Charles T.

Miller, Acting United States Attorney, Joshua C. Hanks, Assistant

United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Donnie Wayne Bowman appeals the sixty-three-month

sentence imposed after a jury found him guilty of being a felon in

possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1)

(2000), and possessing a stolen firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C.

§ 922(j) (2000). Bowman challenges the reasonableness of his

sentence, contending that it is longer than necessary to comply

with the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C.A. § 3553(a)(2) (West 2000

& Supp. 2005). We find, however, that the district court sentenced

Bowman only after appropriately considering and examining the

sentencing guidelines and the § 3553(a) factors, as instructed by

United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005). The court sentenced

Bowman within the applicable advisory guideline range and well

below the ten-year statutory maximum set forth in 18 U.S.C.

§ 924(a)(2) (2000). We cannot conclude that, under these

circumstances, Bowman’s sentence is unreasonable. See United

States v. Green, 436 F.3d 449, 457 (4th Cir. 2006) (finding that

sentence imposed within properly calculated advisory guidelines

range is presumptively reasonable); see also United States v.

Johnson, F.3d , , 2006 WL 893594, at *6 (4th Cir. Apr. 7,

2006) (No. 05-4378) (finding that district court’s “detailed

inquiry into the various circumstances bearing upon [defendant’s]

sentence” satisfied court’s obligation to consider § 3553(a)

factors). 
- 3 -

Accordingly, we affirm the sentence. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED