alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 182 (Wednesday, September 20, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 54991]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-7806]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Ocean Transportation Intermediary License; Reissuances

    Notice is hereby given that the following Ocean Transportation 
Intermediary licenses have been reissued by the Federal Maritime 
Commission pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984, (46 
U.S.C. app. 1718) and the regulations of the Commission pertaining to 
the licensing of Ocean Transportation Intermediaries, 46 CFR part 515.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
         License No.                               Name/address                             Date reissued
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
017198F......................  OMJ International Freight Inc., 8423 NW., 68th       June 23, 2006.
                                Street, Miami, FL 33166.
016012F......................  Samari Global Trade, Inc., 1310 Beach Avenue,        June 4, 2006.
                                Bronx, NY 10472.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Peter J. King,
Deputy Director, Bureau of Certification, and Licensing.
[FR Doc. 06-7806 Filed 9-19-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 558

To amend title 10, United States Code, to provide for the award of the

Purple Heart to persons wounded in action by friendly fire.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 21, 1993

Mr. PETERSON of Florida introduced the following bill; which was referred to

the Committee on Armed Services

A BILL

To amend title 10, United States Code, to provide for the

award of the Purple Heart to persons wounded in action

by friendly fire.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. AWARD OF PURPLE HEART TO PERSONS

4 WOUNDED IN ACTION BY FRIENDLY FIRE.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 57 of title 10, United

6 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the follow7 ing new section:
2

•HR 558 IH

1 ‘‘§ 1129. Purple Heart: treatment of persons wounded

2 in action by friendly fire

3 ‘‘(a) For purposes of the award of the Purple Heart,

4 the Secretary concerned shall treat a person described in

5 subsection (b) the same as a person who was wounded in

6 action as the result of an act of an enemy of the United

7 States.

8 ‘‘(b) A person described in this subsection is a person

9 who was wounded in action by weapon fire while directly

10 engaged in armed conflict, regardless of the origin of the

11 fire causing the wound.

12 ‘‘(c) This section applies to wounds received on or

13 after December 7, 1941.’’.

14 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections

15 at the beginning of such chapter is amended by adding

16 at the end the following new item:

‘‘1129. Purple Heart: treatment of persons wounded in action by friendly fire.’’.

Æ
# EUR-Lex - 11997E085 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11997E085

**Treaty establishing the European Community (Amsterdam consolidated version) - Part Three: Community policies - Title VI: Common rules on competition, taxation and approximation of laws - Chapter 1: Rules on competition - Section 1: Rules applying to undertakings - Article 85 - Article 89 - EC Treaty (Maastricht consolidated version) - Article 89 - EEC Treaty **

*
Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0210 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0029 - Consolidated version (EEC Treaty - no official publication available) *

Treaty establishing the European Community (Amsterdam consolidated version)

Article 85

1. Without prejudice to Article 84, the Commission shall ensure the application of the principles laid down in Articles 81 and 82. On application by a Member State or on its own initiative, and in cooperation with the competent authorities in the Member States, who shall give it their assistance, the Commission shall investigate cases of suspected infringement of these principles. If it finds that there has been an infringement, it shall propose appropriate measures to bring it to an end.

2. If the infringement is not brought to an end, the Commission shall record such infringement of the principles in a reasoned decision. The Commission may publish its decision and authorise Member States to take the measures, the conditions and details of which it shall determine, needed to remedy the situation.
```

[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 184 (Friday, September 22, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55465-55466]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-8055]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-8222-3]

Notice of a Public Meeting to Discuss the Draft Simultaneous 
Compliance Guidance Manual for the Stage 2 Rules

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is holding a 
public meeting to discuss the draft Simultaneous Compliance Guidance 
Manual for Stage 2 Rules. This meeting will discuss the purpose and 
organization of the draft. The Agency will present the process for the 
public to provide suggestions and recommendations to strengthen the 
technical basis and make the manual more user-friendly.

DATES: The public meeting will be held on Thursday, October 26, 2005, 
from 1 p.m. to 5 p.m., Eastern time (ET).

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held on the first floor of the East 
Building of EPA Headquarters in Room 1153. The address is EPA East, 
1201 Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For general information about this 
meeting, contact Sarah Bahrman by phone at (202) 564-2335, by e-mail at 
[email protected], or by mail at: U.S. Environmental Protection 
Agency, Mail Code 4607M, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 
20460. For technical inquiries, contact Tom Grubbs at (202) 564-5262, 
or by e-mail: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The purpose of the public meeting is to 
discuss EPA's Draft Simultaneous Compliance Guidance Manual for Stage 2 
Rules. The Draft Simultaneous Compliance Guidance Manual for Stage 2 
Rules is available on the EPA Web site at http://www.epa.gov/safewater/disinfection/stage2/compliance.html. EPA is also soliciting suggestions 
and recommendations to make this draft guidance manual more complete 
and user-friendly. Reviewers are encouraged to be as specific as 
possible and to provide references where appropriate. Submit 
suggestions by e-mail to: [email protected] and indicate that the 
message relates to the ``Draft Simultaneous Compliance Guidance Manual 
for Stage 2 Rules.''

Special Accommodations

    Any person needing special accommodations at this meeting, 
including wheelchair access, should

[[Page 55466]]

contact Sarah Bahrman at the number or email address listed in the FOR 
FURTHERINFORMATION CONTACT section of this notice. Requests for special 
accommodations should be made at least ten days in advance of the 
meeting.

    Dated: September 19, 2006.
Cynthia C. Dougherty,
Director, Office of Ground Water and Drinking Water.
[FR Doc. 06-8055 Filed 9-21-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
Exhibit
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Natural Alternative Products, Inc.,
      (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006, as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ronald
      Almadova, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the Company,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/
      RONALD ALMADOVA


CHIEF
      EXECUTIVE OFFICER











/s/
      RONALD ALMADOVA


CHIEF
      FINANCIAL OFFICER








DATED:
      November 14, 2006





A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
        to
        the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
        and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
        request.
#### § 29.192 How do violations affect my ability to obtain a permit?

Until you comply with the regulations in this subpart, we will not consider a request to conduct any new operations, except plugging and reclamation operations, on Service-administered lands or waters.
# EUR-Lex - 12002E109 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 12002E109

**Treaty establishing the European Community (Nice consolidated version) - Part Three: Community policies - Title VII: Economic and monetary policy - Chapter 2: Monetary policy - Article 109 - Article 108 - EC Treaty (Maastricht consolidated version) - Article 108 - EEC Treaty **

*
Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0077 - 0077 Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0222 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0037 - Consolidated version (EEC Treaty - no official publication available) *

Treaty establishing the European Community (Nice consolidated version)

Part Three: Community policies

Title VII: Economic and monetary policy

Chapter 2: Monetary policy

Article 109

Article 108 - EC Treaty (Maastricht consolidated version)

Article 108 - EEC Treaty

Article 109

Each Member State shall ensure, at the latest at the date of the establishment of the ESCB, that its national legislation including the statutes of its national central bank is compatible with this Treaty and the Statute of the ESCB.
<PAGE>

                                                                     Exhibit 23

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements,
numbers 333-35884, 333-87977 and 333-66297 on Form S-3 and numbers 333-89989,
333-94125, 33-72108 and 333-97525 on Form S-8 of Precision Optics Corporation,
Inc. of our report dated August 14, 2002, with respect to the consolidated
balance sheet of Precision Optics Corporation, Inc. and Subsidiaries, as of June
30, 2002 and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders'
equity and cash flows for the year then ended, which report appears in the June
30, 2002 annual report on Form 10-KSB of Precision Optics Corporation, Inc.

                                                /s/ KPMG LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
September 26, 2002
§ 217.260 Specified activity and specified geographical region. ( a ) Regulations in this subpart apply to activities associated with the Ocean Wind 1 project (hereafter referred to as the “Project”) by Ocean Wind, LLC (hereafter referred to as “LOA Holder”), and those persons it authorizes or funds to conduct activities on its behalf in the area outlined in paragraph (b) of this section. Requirements imposed on LOA Holder must be implemented by those persons it authorizes or funds to conduct activities on its behalf.
( b ) The specified geographical region is the Mid-Atlantic Bight, which includes, but is not limited to, the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) Lease Area Outer Continental Shelf (OCS)-A 0498 Commercial Lease of Submerged Lands for Renewable Energy Development, two export cable routes, and two sea-to-shore transition points located in New Jersey at Oyster Creek, Island Beach State Park in Barnegat Bay, Farm Property, and BL England.
( c ) The specified activities are impact pile driving of wind turbine generator (WTGs) and offshore substation (OSSs) foundations; vibratory pile driving (install and subsequently remove) of cofferdams and goal posts; high-resolution geophysical (HRG) site characterization surveys; unexploded ordnances or munitions and explosives of concern (UXOs/MECs) detonation; vessel transit within the specified geographical region to transport crew, supplies, and materials; WTG operation; fishery and ecological monitoring surveys; placement of scour protection; and trenching, laying, and burial activities associated with the installation of the export cable route from OSSs to shore-based converter stations and inter-array cables between turbines.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### APPEAL 

### O F 

### F LORIDA 

### S ECOND 

### D ISTRICT

JAMES L. ROBISON, Appellant,
v. CITIBANK, N.A. and U.S. BANK,

Appellees. No. 2D22-904, 2D22-2591 CONSOLIDATED
February 28, 2024 Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.130 from the Circuit Court for Sarasota County; Andrea McHugh and Stephen M. Walker, Judges. James L. Robison, pro se. James H. Wyman, B.C.S. of Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP, Coral Gables, for Appellee Citibank, N.A. No appearance for Appellee U.S. Bank. PER CURIAM. In these consolidated appeals, we dismiss for lack of jurisdiction the portion of the appeal in case number 2D22-2591 challenging the trial court's July 12, 2022, denial of James L. Robison's motion to disqualify the trial judge. See Sutton v. State , 975 So. 2d 1073, 1076 (Fla. 2008)2

("[P]rohibition is . . . recognized as the proper avenue for immediate review of whether a motion to disqualify a trial judge has been correctly denied."). We find no merit to the remaining issues Robison has raised on appeal and otherwise affirm without comment. Affirmed in part and dismissed in part. SLEET, C.J., and KELLY and VILLANTI, JJ., Concur. Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
Case 16-24660    Doc 34    Filed 07/16/18    Entered 07/16/18 15:19:31    Desc Main Document      Page 1 of 5

Case 16-24660    Doc 34    Filed 07/16/18    Entered 07/16/18 15:19:31    Desc Main Document      Page 2 of 5

Case 16-24660    Doc 34    Filed 07/16/18    Entered 07/16/18 15:19:31    Desc Main Document      Page 3 of 5

Case 16-24660    Doc 34    Filed 07/16/18    Entered 07/16/18 15:19:31    Desc Main Document      Page 4 of 5

Case 16-24660    Doc 34    Filed 07/16/18    Entered 07/16/18 15:19:31    Desc Main Document      Page 5 of 5
#### Louisville *&*Nashville Railroad Company v. Williams’ Administrator.

(Decided October 5, 1917.)

Appeal from Hart Circuit Court.

Appeal and Error — Common Law Action — Reversal of Judgment— Practice. — While it is the practice in common law actions where the Court of Appeals is of the opinion that the plaintiff failed to make out a case for the jury to reverse the judgment for a new trial consistent with the opinion, yet this rule is for the benefit of the plaintiff and where plaintiff concedes that the evidence on *21another trial will be the same and asks that the opinion be modified and the judgment reversed with directions to dismiss the petition, his petition for a modification of the opinion in this respect will be granted.

WATKINS & CARDEN, SIMS & RODES and BENJAMIN D. WARFIELD for appellant.

H. L. JAMES and C. B. LARIMORE for appellee.

Opinion of the Court by

William Rogers Clay,

Commissioner — Granting petition for modification of opinion.

In onr former opinion, we held that appellee, who was plaintiff below, failed to make ont a case for the jury, and reversed the judgment for a new trial consistent with the opinion. Appellee now asks that the opinion be modified and the judgment reversed with directions to dismiss the petition. The petition for modification of the opinion is based on the following facts: Plaintiff desires a review of the decision of this court by the United States Supreme Court. To that end a final judgment is necessary. He concedes that on another trial, the evidence will be the same, and that the trial court, following the opinion of this court, will direct a judgment in favor of the appellant. In order to save the unnecessary trouble and expense of another trial, he is now willing for this court to direct that the petition be dismissed.

While it is our practice in common law suits where this court is of the opinion that the plaintiff failed to. make out a case, to reverse the judgment for another trial consistent with the opinion, this rule is solely for the benefit of the plaintiff, who may be able on another trial to supply the evidence necessary to make out his case. Where, however, as in this instance, the plaintiff concedes that on another trial he will be finable to make out a case under the opinion of this court and petitions the court to modify its opinion and direct that plaintiff’s petition be dismissed, we conclude that the petition for a modification of the opinion should be granted.

Wherefore, that part of the former opinion reversing the- judgment for a new trial consistent with the opinion, is withdrawn, and the judgment is reversed with directions to dismiss the petition.
EXHIBIT
32.1





Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








I,
Michael Timms, Chief Executive Officer and President of Australian Forest
Industries (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:





(1)           the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended March
31, 2008 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)           the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: May
20, 2008





/s/
Michael Timms


Michael
Timms


Chief
Executive Officer and President
Exhibit 35.1

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

Chase Bank USA, National Association

Chase Issuance Trust

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Chase Bank USA, National Association (the Bank), as Servicer, pursuant to the Third Amended and Restated Transfer and Servicing Agreement, dated
as of December 19, 2007, as amended by the First Amendment to the Third Amended and Restated Transfer and Servicing Agreement, dated as of May 8, 2009 (as amended and supplemented from time to time, the Agreement) among the
Bank, as transferor, administrator and servicer (in such capacity, the Servicer), Chase Issuance Trust and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as indenture trustee and collateral agent, does hereby certify that:



| | 1. | The Bank is, as of the date hereof, the Servicer under the Agreement.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | A review of the Servicers activities during the calendar year ended December 31, 2010 (the Reporting Period) and of its performance under the
Agreement has been made under my supervision.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 3. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the
Reporting Period.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this certificate this 29th day of March 2011.



CHASE BANK USA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as ServicerBy:

/s/ Keith W. SchuckName:

Keith W. SchuckTitle:

President
# EUR-Lex - 12002M032 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 12002M032

**Treaty on European Union (Nice consolidated version) - Title VI: Provisions on police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters - Article 32 - Article K.4 - EU Treaty (Maastricht 1992) - **

*
Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0023 - 0023 Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0164 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 191 , 29/07/1992 P. 0062 *

Treaty on European Union (Nice consolidated version)

Title VI: Provisions on police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters

Article 32

Article K.4 - EU Treaty (Maastricht 1992)

Article 32

The Council shall lay down the conditions and limitations under which the competent authorities referred to in Articles 30 and 31 may operate in the territory of another Member State in liaison and in agreement with the authorities of that State.
§ 270.9 Terms, vacancies, and removal of Council members. ( a ) A Council term is for 3 years, except for initial appointments to a newly established Council where: ( 1 ) Half of the Council member terms will be 2 years; and
( 2 ) Half of the Council member terms will be 3 years.
( b ) A vacancy on a Council will be filled, within 60 days after the vacancy occurs, in the same manner in which the original appointment was made. A member appointed to fill a vacancy occurring before the expiration of the term for which the member's predecessor was appointed will be appointed only for the remainder of such term.
( c ) Any person appointed under the Act who consistently fails or refuses to perform his or her duties properly and/or participates in acts of dishonesty or willful misconduct with respect to responsibilities under the Act will be removed from the Council by NMFS if two-thirds of the members of the Council recommend action. All requests from a Council to NMFS for removal of a Council member must be in writing and accompanied by a statement of the reasons upon which the recommendation is based.
Editorial Note on Part 622
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 622 appear at 79 FR 57837, Sept. 26, 2014 and at 81 FR 32253, May 23, 2016.

§ 622.478 Prohibited species. The harvest and possession restrictions of this section apply without regard to whether the species is harvested by a vessel operating under a commercial vessel permit. The operator of a vessel that fishes in the EEZ around St. Croix is responsible for the limit applicable to that vessel. Any of the following species caught in the EEZ around St. Croix must be released immediately with a minimum of harm. ( a ) *Reef fish.* No person may fish for or possess the following reef fish species in or from the EEZ around St. Croix. ( 1 ) Goliath grouper or Nassau grouper.
( 2 ) Blue parrotfish, midnight parrotfish, or rainbow parrotfish.
( b ) - ( c ) [Reserved]
( d ) *Coral, sea cucumber, and sea urchin.* A coral, sea cucumber, or sea urchin may not be fished for or possessed in or from the EEZ around St. Croix. The taking of coral in the EEZ around St. Croix is not considered unlawful possession provided it is returned immediately to the sea in the general area of fishing.
( e ) [Reserved]
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: FAA- 2012 - 0291 Directorate Identifier: 2011NM168AD

A320 -57 - 1153, R01 --- 6/28/10 A320 -57 - 1153 --- 2/9/10

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket 

### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 03/05/2008