alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Page

# Iof2

RE: 

### NRGfacilities T,^

# f å1"*, Kathrvn (S.Portland,ME-US) 

### Bill Maxwell 

## ßD4njll03:2ó PM Cc: 

### "Kopacz, Richard (Windsor,CT-US)' Hide Delails From: "Brown, Kathryn 

### (S.Portlan{ME-US)" <KBrown@trcsolutions.com> To: 

### Bill MaxwelVRTPruSEPAruS@EPA Cc: "Kopacz, Richard 

### (Windso¡CT-US)" <RKopacz@trcsolutions.com>

History: This message has been 

### replied to.

4

### Attachments 

# T rgì ...I 

### inageool.gif 5ó2-Unit-2-EmisTmMethods_update0324l 

### l.xls 546_Unit_S_EmisTesMethods_update0324l 

### l.xls 548_UnitJ_Em¡sTestMethods_updat4324l Lxls [,!r N¡awell, wæ recently broughl to my atttrhon that thse is aneror ¡n how the [¡ethod 308 lblMN¡Btu 

### il¡ssion rate was calculaled for the following NRG fscititis: NRG t\4iddleloM (EPA-HO-OAR-2009-0234-0765) NRG Noealk (EPA-HO-OAR-2009-0234-0767) NRG N.lonlville (EPA-HO-OAR-2009-0234-2530) We

### wuld like to update the approprìate dockels wlh the corrected e¡nisslon 

### rats æ attached to this snell

### ed summarized below inbold rad fonl. EIA 

### Facillty MqqtetoM 

### rowq 562 Slatim 2
Run Number Tost Start Detê 

### Test 

### Stút T¡me Têst End

Date 

### Tæt

End Tlmo 

### lotalVÐt Phæe Mêrcurv 

### Emlßabn

### T6l R6uhÊ

Measu16d Value (ug/dscm) 

## 86ls

(Wot

### or Dry) TeBt

Mêthod Us€d Data

Flag (ADL,

### BDtDDLI Tost Method



### Cmmerits (lbrmmBtu)

412212010 06:38 u2212010 OA'34 

### olì4l ntu U.S. EPA f\rethod 3lìFt ADL 3.e9E{r8 

### u))12Mî fìn

## íì 4t2U2010 1050 0.045 Dry U.S. EPA f\,lethod MR ADI Àí'FÆ

3 4122120'lo l1 :00 412212010 13:00 0057 Dry U.ù. tsPA t\rethod 

### ..¡B ADL 5.15E.{¡8



# file://C:\Documents and 

# Settings\bmaxwell\Local Settings\Temp\notes87944B\-web4028.... 

# 3l30l20Il

# Page2

# of2

EIA

## Faclllty Bollor 

## Cods Facllltv

## Nme lD 

# ffi

Run Number Test Start Dato 

### Test 

## Strt Tlms TeBt End

Dâto Tost End

Tlme Total VaDor Phase Morcury 

### Emissþn Test Rosults

Moasuaed Valus (ugy'dBGm) Ba3iB

(Wet

## a Drvl 

### Tæt

Method UBêd 

### uqa

Flag (ADL, BDL, hñt ì 

### Tæt 

### ilethod

Colnments (lb/mmBhr)

6J412010 1Ot52 â1412010 2:52 0056 Drv lì,lethod SR ADL 6.02E{t8
2 Êt¿trõ1õ 

### la)t âJ¿l)õ1n 15 22 o tì¿5 Dry U.ù. ETA ftrethod ADL ¿-75E{t8
d412010 15:50 61412010 17:50 0.048 Dru Method ?tìFt Ân Á

### qnF¡n



# file://C:\Documents and 

# Settings\bmaxwell\Local Settings\Ternp\notes87944B\-web4028.... 3/3012011
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 18

- 00122

- CV

P.F. and wife, J.F., as Next Friends of Their Daughter I.F.

v.

S.S., S.S

. , and S.S. §

§

§

§ From the 442nd District Court

of Denton County (16

- 03909

- 442)

July 19 , 2018

Opinion by Chief Justice Qui nn



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was error in part of the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the

judgment of the trial court is affirmed in part and reversed in part. We reverse

th e p ortion of the trial court’s summary judgment denying Appellants’ negligence

claim as to the appellees identified as “ Debbie ” and “ Junior ” in the opinion and

reman d this case to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this

opinion as to thes e appellees. W e affirm the remainder of the trial court’s

judgment

.
It is further ordered that all parties shall bear their own costs of this appeal,

for which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Brian Quinn Chief Justice Brian Quinn
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7962
STEVEN E. HESTER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus STEVEN STOWE, F.B.I.; ED RYAN, F.B.I.; PATRICK MCNARDO, U.S.M.; SCOTT SEWALL, U.S.M.; OFFICER SWEET, AA County Police; BEN WILSON, B.C.D.C.; VENABLE, Social Worker, B.C.D.C., Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-95- 2300-AMD) Submitted: March 12, 1996 Decided: March 21, 1996 Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Steven E. Hester, Appellant Pro Se. Lynne Ann Battaglia, United States Attorney, Perry F. Sekus, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing certain Defendants and certain claims from his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) action. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction onlyover final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1988), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1988); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### § 95.977 CBRS tone transmissions.

In addition to the tones permitted under § 95.377, CBRS transmitter types may be designed to transmit brief tones to indicate the beginning or end of a transmission.
DISMISS and Opinion Filed December 18, 2018 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-00902-CV 

EDDIE FRANKUM AND HALO PROTECTION SERVICES, INC., Appellants 

V. 

VIVIAN SCHWARZ, Appellee 

On Appeal from the 68th Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DC-15-15096 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Evans, and Justice Brown 

Opinion by Chief Justice Wright 

Before the Court is appellants’ unopposed motion to dismiss appeal. Appellants no longer 

wish to prosecute this appeal as the parties have settled their differences. Accordingly, we grant 

the motion and dismiss the appeal. TEX. R. APP. P. 42(a)(1). 

180902F.P05 

 

/Carolyn Wright/ 

CAROLYN WRIGHT 

CHIEF JUSTICE 
 –2– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

EDDIE FRANKUM AND HALO 

PROTECTION SERVICES, INC., 

Appellants 

No. 05-18-00902-CV V. 

VIVIAN SCHWARZ, Appellee 

 On Appeal from the 68th Judicial District 

Court, Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DC-15-15096. 

Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright. 

Justices Evans and Brown participating. 

 In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED. 

 Subject to any agreement between the parties, it is ORDERED that appellee VIVIAN 

SCHWARZ recover her costs of this appeal from appellants EDDIE FRANKUM AND HALO 

PROTECTION SERVICES, INC. 

Judgment entered December 18, 2018.
BEFORE THE
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WASHINGTON, D.C.

) In the matter of the application of ) )
AUSTRAL LINEAS AEREAS – CIELOS DEL SUR S.A. ) Docket DOT-OST-2011-0154 ) for an exemption from 49 U.S.C. §41301 ) )

SUPPLEMENT NO. ONE TO AP PLICATION FOR EXEMPTION

Communications with respect to this document should be addressed to:

Charles F. Donley II Squire, Sanders & Dempsey (US) L.L.P.
1200 19 th Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20036 (202) 626-6840 phone (202) 626-6780 fax cdonley@ssd.com

Counsel to Austral Lineas Aereas – Cielos
del Sur S.A.

DATED: September 19, 2011BEFORE THE
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WASHINGTON, D.C.

) In the matter of the application of ) )
AUSTRAL LINEAS AEREAS – CIELOS DEL SUR S.A. ) Docket DOT-OST-2011-0154 ) for an exemption from 49 U.S.C. §41301 ) )

SUPPLEMENT NO. ONE TO AP PLICATION FOR EXEMPTION

Austral Lineas Aereas – Cielos del Sur S.A. (“Austral”) hereby submits this supplement

to its pending application for an exemption in the cap tioned docket. The supplement consists of

Austral’s most recent available financial information. This info rmation is subject to revision

during the ongoing share e xpropriation process.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Charles F. Donley II

__________________________________ Charles F. Donley II Squire, Sanders & Dempsey (US) L.L.P.
1200 19 th Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20036 (202) 626-6840 phone (202) 626-6780 fax cdonley@ssd.com

Counsel to Austral Lineas Aereas – Cielos
del Sur S.A.

DATED: September 19, 2011i CERTIFICATE OF SERVCE

I hereby certify that one copy of the foregoi ng supplement of Austral Lineas Aereas – Cielos del Sur S.A. has this day been served on each of the following individuals via e-mail.

/s/ Charles F. Donley II

_________________________________ Charles F. Donley II

DATED: September 19, 2011

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com ; jeff.morgan@delta.com howard.kass@usairways.com ; benjamin.slocum@usairways.com
dan.weiss@coair.com ; thomas.bolling@united.com ; steve.morrissey@united.com
carl.nelson@aa.com nssparks@fedex.com ; cefelts@fedex.com
anita.mosner@hklaw.com ; jennifer.nowak@hklaw.com esta.rosenberg@dot.gov ; brian.hedberg@dot.gov ; Robert.finamore@dot.gov urskr@state.gov john.allen@faa.gov
info@airlineinfo.com
Editorial Note on Part 622
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 622 appear at 79 FR 57837, Sept. 26, 2014 and at 81 FR 32253, May 23, 2016.

§ 622.185 Size limits. All size limits in this section are minimum size limits unless specified otherwise. A fish not in compliance with its size limit, as specified in this section, in or from the South Atlantic EEZ, may not be possessed, sold, or purchased. A fish not in compliance with its size limit must be released immediately with a minimum of harm. The operator of a vessel that fishes in the EEZ is responsible for ensuring that fish on board are in compliance with the size limits specified in this section. ( a ) *Snapper* — ( 1 ) [Reserved]
( 2 ) *Vermilion snapper* —12 inches (30.5 cm), TL.
( 3 ) *Cubera, gray, and yellowtail snappers* —12 inches (30.5 cm), TL.
( 4 ) *Mutton snapper* —18 inches (45.7 cm), TL.
( 5 ) *Lane snapper* —8 inches (20.3 cm), TL.
( b ) *Grouper* — ( 1 ) *Red, yellowfin, and yellowmouth grouper; and scamp* —20 inches (50.8 cm), TL.
( 2 ) *Black grouper and gag* —24 inches (61.0 cm), TL.
( c ) *Other snapper-grouper species* — ( 1 ) *Black sea bass.* ( i ) For a fish taken by a person subject to the bag limit specified in § 622.187(b)(7)—13 inches (33 cm), TL.
( ii ) For a fish taken by a person not subject to the bag limit specified in § 622.187(b)(7)—11 inches (28 cm), TL.
( 2 ) *Gray triggerfish* —12 inches (30.5 cm), FL.
( 3 ) *Hogfish.* ( i ) In the South Atlantic EEZ off Georgia, South Carolina, and North Carolina—17 inches (43.2 cm), fork length.
( ii ) In the South Atlantic EEZ off the Florida Keys and east coast of Florida, and in the Gulf EEZ south of 25°09′ N. lat. off the west coast of Florida—16 inches (40.6 cm), fork length.
( 4 ) *Red porgy* —14 inches (35.6 cm), TL.
( 5 ) *Greater amberjack* —28 inches (71.1 cm), fork length, for a fish taken by a person subject to the bag limit specified in § 622.187(b)(1) and 34 inches (86.4 cm), fork length, for a fish taken by a person not subject to the bag limit.
( 6 ) *Almaco jack.* For a fish taken by a person not subject to the bag limit specified in § 622.187(b)(8)—20 inches (50.8 cm), FL.
[78 FR 22952, Apr. 17, 2013, as amended at 78 FR 44465, July 24, 2013; 80 FR 30952, June 1, 2015; 81 FR 32253, May 23, 2016; 82 FR 34594, July 25, 2017; 83 FR 1309, Jan. 11, 2018; 85 FR 4594, Jan. 27, 2020; 85 FR 11309, Feb. 27, 2020; 88 FR 65822, Sept. 26, 2023]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [Investigation Nos. 731-TA-703 and 705 (Second Review)] 

## Determinations 

                    On the basis of the record [1]                                          developed in the subject five-year reviews, the United States International Trade Commission (Commission) determines, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)) (the Act), that revocation of the antidumping duty orders on furfuryl alcohol from China and Thailand would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.                 

## Background 

                    The Commission instituted these reviews on April 3, 2006 (71 FR 16587) and determined on July 7, 2006 that it would conduct expedited reviews (71 FR 41469, July 21, 2006). Notice of the scheduling of the Commission's reviews was given by posting copies of the notice in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, and by publishing the notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     on July 21, 2006 (71 FR  41469).                 

                    The Commission transmitted its determinations in these reviews to the Secretary of Commerce on September 15, 2006. The views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 3885 (September 2006), entitled                     *Furfuryl Alcohol from China and Thailand: Investigation Nos. 731-TA-703 and 705 (Second Review)*.                 

Issued: September 20, 2006. 

By order of the Commission. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

# Footnotes

1.                             The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 06-8170 Filed 9-22-06; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
# EUR-Lex - 12004V001 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V001

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART I - TITLE I — DEFINITION AND OBJECTIVES OF THE UNION - Article I-1 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0011 - 0011 *

Article I-1

Establishment of the Union

1. Reflecting the will of the citizens and States of Europe to build a common future, this Constitution establishes the European Union, on which the Member States confer competences to attain objectives they have in common. The Union shall coordinate the policies by which the Member States aim to achieve these objectives, and shall exercise on a Community basis the competences they confer on it.

2. The Union shall be open to all European States which respect its values and are committed to promoting them together.

--------------------------------------------------
# EUR-Lex - 12004V048 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V048

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART I - TITLE VI — THE DEMOCRATIC LIFE OF THE UNION - Article I-48 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0035 - 0035 *

Article I-48

The social partners and autonomous social dialogue

The Union recognises and promotes the role of the social partners at its level, taking into account the diversity of national systems. It shall facilitate dialogue between the social partners, respecting their autonomy.

The Tripartite Social Summit for Growth and Employment shall contribute to social dialogue.

--------------------------------------------------
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk September 11, 2009

d0901 

# Order

September 11, 2009

138840

ERIC BRUCE DINKINS, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 138840 COA: 289196 Ingham CC: 06-000427-AW MICHIGAN PAROLE BOARD, DAVID PHILLIPS, and JOHN RUBITSCHUN, Defendants-Appellees.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the March 26, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
§ 665.603 Permits. ( a ) *Applicability.* PRIA. The owner of any vessel used to fish for, land, or transship PRIA bottomfish MUS shoreward of the outer boundary of the PRIA subarea must have a permit issued under this section, and the permit must be registered for use with that vessel.
( b ) *Submission.* An application for a permit required under this section must be submitted to PIRO as described in § 665.13.
§ 600.1510 Notification of type-approval. ( a ) If a request made pursuant to § 600.1501 (type-approval) is approved or partially approved, NMFS will issue a type-approval letter to indicate the specific EMTU/EMTU-C model, MCSP, or bundle that is approved for use, the MCS or class of MCSs permitted for use with the type-approved EMTU, and the regions or fisheries in which the EMTU/EMTU-C, MCSP, or bundle is approved for use.
( b ) The NMFS Office of Law Enforcement will maintain a list of type-approved EMTUs/EMTU-C, MCSPs, and bundles on a publicly available website and provide copies of the list upon request.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-21-00004-CR

The State of Texas, Appellant

v.

Jordan Craig Wetz, Appellee

FROM THE 433RD DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY

NO. CR2013-564, THE HONORABLE DIB WALDRIP, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N 

The State of Texas filed a notice of appeal from the district court’s order granting

appellee Jordan Craig Wetz’s motion to terminate his probation. The State has now filed a 

motion to dismiss its appeal, representing that the district court has withdrawn its order. We 

grant the motion and dismiss the State’s appeal.

__________________________________________

Gisela D. Triana, Justice

Before Justices Goodwin, Triana, and Smith

Filed: January 29, 2021

Do Not Publish
§ 218.30 Specified activity and specified geographical region. ( a ) Regulations in this subpart apply only to the U.S. Navy (Navy) and those persons it authorizes or funds to conduct activities on its behalf for the taking of marine mammals that occurs in the areas outlined in paragraph (b) of this section and that occurs incidental to maintenance construction activities.
( b ) The taking of marine mammals by the Navy may be authorized in a Letter of Authorization (LOA) only if it occurs within California coastal waters in the vicinity of Naval Weapons Station Seal Beach.
Exhibit
21.01





Subsidiaries
of the Company





America’s
Drive-In Brand Properties LLC, a Kansas limited liability company


America’s
Drive-In Restaurants LLC, a Kansas limited liability company


Sonic
Capital LLC, a Delaware limited liability company


Sonic
Industries LLC, a Delaware limited liability company


Sonic
Industries Services Inc., an Oklahoma corporation


Sonic
Restaurants, Inc., an Oklahoma corporation


Sonic
Partnership Interests Inc., an Oklahoma corporation


Sonic
Property Development, L.L.C., an Oklahoma limited liability company


Sonic
Technology Fund, L.L.C., an Oklahoma limited liability company


Sonic
Value Card, L.L.C., a Virginia limited liability company


SPOTlight,
LLC, an Oklahoma limited liability company


SRI Real
Estate Holding LLC, a Delaware limited liability company


SRI Real
Estate Properties LLC, a Delaware limited liability company








As of
August 31, 2009, Sonic Restaurants, Inc. or America’s Drive-In Restaurants LLC
owns the majority interest in 475 partnerships and limited liability companies,
each of which operates a Sonic Drive-In restaurant.  The names of
those 475 majority-owned entities have been omitted.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Celtron International, Inc. on  Form  10QSB  for  the  period ended June 30, 2005,  as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report'),  I, Allen Harington,  Chief  Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to  18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as  adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)   The information contained  in  the  Report  fairly presents, in all material  respects,  the financial condition and result of  operations  of  the Company.







/s/ Allen Harington

_____________________

Allen Harington

Chief Executive Officer

Date: August 19, 2005
<PAGE>
               CONSENT OF GRANT THORNTON LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 33-94708) pertaining to the Midland Resources, Inc. Long-Term Incentive
Plan, Midland Resources, Inc. 1995 Directors' Stock Option Plan and Midland
Resources Operating Co., Inc. 401(k) Employees' Stock Ownership Plan and Trust 
of our report dated March 21, 1997, with respect to the consolidated financial 
statements of Midland Resources, Inc. included in this annual report (Form 
10-KSB) for the year ended December 31, 1996.




                                        GRANT THORNTON LLP

Houston, Texas
March 27, 1997
# EUR-Lex - 11992E238 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11992E238

**TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY - PART SIX : GENERAL AND FINAL PROVISIONS - ARTICLE 238 /* CODIFIED VERSION OF THE TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY */ **

*
Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0078 *

Article 238

The Community may conclude with one or more States or international organizations agreements establishing an association involving reciprocal rights and obligations, common action and special procedure.
# EUR-Lex - 12004V/PRO/21 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V/PRO/21

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - Protocols and Annexes - 21.Protocol on external relations of the Member States with regard to the crossing of external borders **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0361 - 0361 *

21. PROTOCOL ON EXTERNAL RELATIONS OF THE MEMBER STATES WITH REGARD TO THE CROSSING OF EXTERNAL BORDERS

THE HIGH CONTRACTING PARTIES,

TAKING INTO ACCOUNT the need of the Member States to ensure effective controls at their external borders, in cooperation with third countries where appropriate,

HAVE AGREED UPON the following provision, which shall be annexed to the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe:

Sole article

The provisions on the measures on the crossing of external borders included in Article III-265(2)(b) of the Constitution shall be without prejudice to the competence of Member States to negotiate or conclude agreements with third countries as long as they respect Union law and other relevant international agreements.

--------------------------------------------------