alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 600.515 Interpretation of 16 U.S.C. 1857(4).

Section 307(4) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act prohibits any fishing vessel other than a vessel of the United States (foreign fishing vessel) from operating in the EEZ if all of the fishing gear on board the vessel is not stowed in compliance with that section “unless such vessel is authorized to engage in fishing in the area in which the vessel is operating.” If such a vessel has a permit authorization that is limited to fishing activities other than catching, taking or harvesting (such as support, scouting or processing activities), it must have all of its fishing gear stowed at all times while it is in the EEZ. If such a vessel has a permit authorization to engage in catching, taking or harvesting activities, but such authorization is limited to a specific area within the EEZ, and/or to a specific period of time, the vessel must have all of its fishing gear stowed while it is in the EEZ, except when it is in the specific area authorized, and/or during the specific period of time authorized.

[61 FR 32540, June 24, 1996, as amended at 63 FR 7075, Feb. 12, 1998]
§ 80.31 How does an agency certify the number of paid license holders? ( a ) A State fish and wildlife agency certifies the number of paid license holders by responding to the Director's annual request for the following information: ( 1 ) The number of people who have paid licenses to hunt in the State during the State-specified certification period (certification period); and
( 2 ) The number of people who have paid licenses to fish in the State during the certification period.
( b ) The agency director or his or her designee: ( 1 ) Must certify the information at paragraph (a) of this section in the format that the Director specifies;
( 2 ) Must provide documentation to support the accuracy of this information at the Director's request;
( 3 ) Is responsible for eliminating multiple counting of the same individuals in the information that he or she certifies; and
( 4 ) May use statistical sampling, automated record consolidation, or other techniques approved by the Director for this purpose.
( c ) If an agency director uses statistical sampling to eliminate multiple counting of the same individuals, he or she must ensure that the sampling is complete by the earlier of the following: ( 1 ) Five years after the last statistical sample; or
( 2 ) Before completing the first certification following any change in the licensing system that could affect the number of license holders.
# EUR-Lex - 12004V061 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V061

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART II — THE CHARTER OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THE UNION - TITLE I — DIGNITY - Article II-61 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0042 - 0042 *

Article II-61

Human dignity

Human dignity is inviolable. It must be respected and protected.

--------------------------------------------------
#### § 600.720 Vessel and gear identification.

Regulations pertaining to special vessel and gear markings required for certain fisheries are set forth in the parts of this chapter governing those fisheries.
1The Honorable Russell G. Clark, United States District Judge for the Western

District of Missouri.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 99-2370

___________

Michael D. Eanes, *

*

Appellant, *

*

v. * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

Jayne Montgomery, Clinical Director; * Western District of Missouri.

*

Appellee, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

John Moss, Phase II Supervising *

Counselor; D.B. Overbey, Primary *

Counselor, *

*

Defendants. *

___________

 Submitted: April 5, 2000

 Filed: April 14, 2000

___________

Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD, BOWMAN, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Michael Eanes, a Missouri inmate, appeals following the District Court’s1 grant

of summary judgment to Jayne Montgomery, Clinical Director of the Drug Treatment
-2-

Program at the Ozark Correctional Center, in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Supp. III 1997)

action. After reviewing the record and the parties’ briefs, we conclude summary

judgment was properly granted. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Rockingham,

No. 4872.

#### Edward R. Lamb *v.*Danville School Board.

Argued July 14, 1960.

Decided July 19, 1960.

*571
      *Robert Shaw*(by brief and orally), for the plaintiff.

*George H. Grinnell*(by brief and orally), for the defendant.

Kenison, C. J.

Air. Justice *Holmes’*reminder “that the machinery of government would not work if it were not allowed a little play in its joints” *(Bain Peanut Co. of Texas*v. *Pinson,*282 U. S. 499, 501), has had particular application in this jurisdiction to town and school meetings. More than three-quarters of a century ago it was established in *Hill*v. *Goodwin,*56 N. H. 441, 447, that parliamentary rules in all their detail were not required to be followed in town meetings. “However wise or necessary such rules may be for legislative bodies, they are not adapted to the successful or prompt dispatch of business in town-meetings; and the statute therefore wisely allows the moderator a large discretion in prescribing rules for the government of his meeting, subject only to revision by the town.” *Hill*v. *Goodwin, supra.*While this statement was made in regard to a town meeting, a similar statute and a similar rule applies in the conduct of school district meetings. RSA 40:4 and RSA 197:19. The latter statute reads as follows: “The moderator shall have the like power and duty as a moderator of a town meeting to conduct the business and to preserve order, and may administer oaths to district officers and in the district business. In case of a vacancy or absence a moderator *pro tempore*may be chosen.” These sections give the moderator a wide discretion in prescribing rules for the government of a school district meeting. *Leonard*v. *School District,*98 N. H. 296.

It has been the consistent practice of the courts of this state to construe liberally votes at town and school meetings without regard to technicalities or the strict rules of parliamentary procedure. *New London*v. *Davis,*73 N. H. 72; *Amey*v. *Pittsburg School District,*95 N. H. 386; *Mace*v. *Salomon,*99 N. H. 370. Irregularities “where a moderator failed to observe the niceties of parliamentary procedure involving no violation of statutes” *(Leonard*v. *School District,*98 N. H. 296, 298) are not sufficient to void the action of a school district meeting. In the present dispute there is no question about official neglect of duty on the part of the moderator. *State*v. *Waterhouse,*71 N. H. 488. Like*572wise there is no question that no appeal was taken by any voter from the rulings of the moderator during the course of the meeting. Since it does not appear that the procedure adopted by the school district violated any statutory duty but at most was a violation of parliamentary procedure, there is no basis for holding that the resulting vote was void or illegal. *Wood*v. *Milton,*197 Mass. 531.

*Petition dismissed.*

All concurred.
#### § 80.124 How may an agency use unexpended program income?

A State fish and wildlife agency must spend program income before requesting additional payments under an award. If the agency has unexpended program income on its final Federal financial report, it may use the income under a subsequent grant for any activity eligible for funding in the grant program that generated the income.

[84 FR 44788, Aug. 27, 2019]
# EUR-Lex - 12004V349 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V349

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART III — THE POLICIES AND FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - TITLE VI — THE FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - CHAPTER I — PROVISIONS GOVERNING THE INSTITUTIONS - Section 1 — The institutions - Subsection 4 — The European Commission - Article III-349 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0155 - 0155 *

Article III-349

If any member of the Commission no longer fulfils the conditions required for the performance of his or her duties or if he or she has been guilty of serious misconduct, the Court of Justice may, on application by the Council, acting by a simple majority, or by the Commission, compulsorily retire him or her.

--------------------------------------------------
#### § 54.9812-2 xxx

###### Cross Reference

Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 77715, Sept. 23, 2024.
# EUR-Lex - 12002M025 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 12002M025

**Treaty on European Union (Nice consolidated version) - Title V: Provisions on a common foreign and security policy - Article 25 **

*
Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0019 - 0019 Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0161 - Consolidated version *

Treaty on European Union (Nice consolidated version)

Title V: Provisions on a common foreign and security policy

Article 25

Article 25

Without prejudice to Article 207 of the Treaty establishing the European Community, a Political and Security Committee shall monitor the international situation in the areas covered by the common foreign and security policy and contribute to the definition of policies by delivering opinions to the Council at the request of the Council or on its own initiative. It shall also monitor the implementation of agreed policies, without prejudice to the responsibility of the Presidency and the Commission.

Within the scope of this title, this Committee shall exercise, under the responsibility of the Council, political control and strategic direction of crisis management operations.

The Council may authorise the Committee, for the purpose and for the duration of a crisis management operation, as determined by the Council, to take the relevant decisions concerning the political control and strategic direction of the operation, without prejudice to Article 47.
#### § 665.226 Notifications.

Any special permit holder subject to the requirements of this subpart must contact the appropriate NMFS enforcement agent in American Samoa, Guam, or Hawaii at least 24 hours before landing any Hawaii coral reef ECS harvested under a special permit, and report the port and the approximate date and time at which the catch will be landed.

[84 FR 2773, Feb. 8, 2019]
#### § 665.98 Management area.

The American Samoa fishery management area is the EEZ seaward of the Territory of American Samoa with the inner boundary coterminous with the seaward boundaries of the Territory of American Samoa and the outer boundary designated as a line drawn in such a manner that each point on it is 200 nautical miles from the baseline from which the territorial sea is measured, or is coterminous with adjacent international maritime boundaries.
Case 16-27602 Doc 5 Filed 08/29/16 Entered 08/29/16 11:00:20 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2
Case 16-27602 Doc 5 Filed 08/29/16 Entered 08/29/16 11:00:20 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

ITG VOMA CORPORATION, CHINA RUBBER 

INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION, SUB-COMMITTEE OF 

TIRE PRODUCERS OF THE CHINA CHAMBER OF 

COMMERCE OF METALS, MINERALS & 

CHEMICAL IMPORTERS,

Plaintiffs-Appellants

v.

UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION, UNITED STEEL, PAPER AND 

FORESTRY, RUBBER, MANUFACTURING, 

ENERGY, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL AND SERVICE 

WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIOCLC,

Defendants-Appellees

______________________

2017-2618, 2017-2619

______________________

Appeals from the United States Court of International 

Trade in Nos. 1:15-cv-00255-JCG, 1:15-cv-00258-JCG,

Judge Jennifer Choe-Groves.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________
JONATHAN THOMAS STOEL, Hogan Lovells US LLP, 

Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant ITG Voma 

Corporation. Also represented by SEAN-MICHAEL 

CARLESIMO, CRAIG ANDERSON LEWIS. 

 NED H. MARSHAK, Grunfeld, Desiderio, Lebowitz, Silverman & Klestadt LLP, New York, NY, argued for plaintiffs-appellants China Rubber Industry Association, SubCommittee of Tire Producers of the China Chamber of 

Commerce of Metals, Minerals & Chemical Importers. 

Also represented by BRUCE M. MITCHELL, MAX FRED 

SCHUTZMAN; JORDAN CHARLES KAHN, ANDREW THOMAS 

SCHUTZ, Washington, DC. 

 COURTNEY SHEEHAN MCNAMARA, Office of the General 

Counsel, United States International Trade Commission,

Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee United 

States International Trade Commission. Also represented 

by DOMINIC L. BIANCHI, ANDREA C. CASSON. 

 GEERT M. DE PREST, Stewart & Stewart, Washington, 

DC, argued for defendant-appellee United Steel, Paper and 

Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIOCLC. Also represented by NICHOLAS J. BIRCH, PATRICK 

JOHN MCDONOUGH, JENNIFER MICHELE SMITH, TERENCE 

PATRICK STEWART.

 ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

 PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, MAYER, and DYK, Circuit 

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

February 19, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

 Date Peter R. Marksteiner

 Clerk of Court
#### Givens v. Van Studdiford, *Appellant.*

1. Private Nuisance: damages. Where the owner knowingly permits a brothel to be established and maintained in his house, which adjoins a tenement of another, by reason of which the latter’s tenants leave, and his property is depreciated in value, the former is liable to the latter for the special damage thereby caused him, over and above the wrong and injury done to the general public.

.2. -: measure oe damages. In such a case the measure of d i n ages is the difference in the selling value of the property and th loss of rent occasioned by such nuisance.

*1303. -: -: evidence of damage. In ascertaining these facts, all circumstances that would show a depreciation in value should be considered, and the damage recovered must be the actual depreciation shown to be caused by the existence of the nuisance.

4. -: -. Where it is shown that, after defendant’s house was occupied as a brothel, other houses of the same character were opened in the same neighborhood, so that the damage caused by others cannot be separated from that caused by defendant, he will he liable for all such damage, if the natural and probable consequence of his illegal act was to cause the injury complained of.*

*Appeal from St. Louis Court of Appeals.*

Affirmed.

*Broadhead, Slayback & Haeussler*for appellant.

*Wm. G. Rainey*for respondent.

*

These syllabi are taken from 4 Mo. App. Rep. 498.

Hough, J.

Tbis was an action to recover damages to certain real property of the plaintiff in the city of St. Louis, alleged to have been sustained by him by reason of a certain nuisance maintained by the defendant upon premises of his adjoining those of the plaintiff. The defendant had judgment in the circuit court, which was reversed by the court of appeals. The opinion of the latter court, which contains a full statement of all the matters in issue, is to be found in 4 Mo. App. Rep. 498. As we fully concur in the views expressed by the court of appeals, we shall not attempt to restate them, but will content ourselves with simply affirming its judgment.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 As Adopted Pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


I, Colin Baird, Chief Financial Officer of Australian Forest Industries (the
"Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended
March 31, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: June 14, 2005


/s/ Colin Baird
---------------
Colin Baird
Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 23


                          CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-10261) pertaining to the 1991 Stock Option Plan of Rochester
Medical Corporation and the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-62592)
pertaining to the 2001 Stock Incentive Plan of Rochester Medical Corporation of
our report dated October 19, 2001, with respect to the financial statements of
Rochester Medical Corporation included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the
year ended September 30, 2001.

     Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of Rochester
Medical Corporation listed in Item 14(a). This schedule is the responsibility of
the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on
our audits. In our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above,
when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole,
present fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.


                                        /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota
December 7, 2001
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the lim ited circumstances set forth in 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FIFTH CIRCUIT

____________

No. 96-31289

____________

SAM AUGUSTINE KING,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

HAROLD M WHEELAHAN, III, A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION,

Intervenor - Appellee,

versus

FUEL SERVICES (formerly Dantzler Boat & Barge Company); BLUE CHIP MV; DANTZLER BOAT & BARGE COMPANY DIVISION; CHEVRON USA INC,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

(93-CV-3676-K) December 11, 1997

Before WIENER, BARKSDALE, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Sam Augustine King appe als from a jury verdict finding that

Dantzler Boat & Barge Company was not liable for injuries King

sustained while working as a seaman on board the MV BLUE CHIP, that

King was 50% at fault for his injuries, and that the MV BLUE CHIPwas seaworthy at the time of the accident. King also appeals the

jury’s award of $2,850 in damages, assessed against Chevron, U.S.A.

In support of his appeal, King argues that both the jury’s damage

award and the findings relevant to this appeal are not supported by

sufficient evidence.

We will n ot reverse a jury verdict concerning liability or

damages unless, viewing all the evidence in the light most

favorable to the verdict, we can say that “no reasonable jury”

could have rendere d the verdict at issue. S ee Myers v. GriffenAlexander Drilling Co.
, 910 F.2d 1252, 1254 (5th Cir. 1990). Here,

however, the record indicates that am ple evidence supports the

jury’s verdict both as to liability and damages.

King points us to other evidence, also contained in the

record, that is contrary to the verdict. Nevertheless, we will not

invade the province of the jury by reweighing the evidence or

redetermining the credibility of those who testified at trial. S ee

Wood v. Diamond M Drilling Co.
, 691 F. 2d 1165, 1168 (5th Cir.

1982).

AFFIRMED.
# EUR-Lex - 11979HN01/03/C - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11979HN01/03/C

**DOCUMENTS CONCERNING THE ACCESSION OF THE HELLENIC REPUBLIC TO THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, ACT CONCERNING THE CONDITIONS OF ACCESSION OF THE HELLENIC REPUBLIC AND THE ADJUSTMENTS TO THE TREATIES, ANNEX I LIST REFERRED TO IN ARTICLE 21 OF THE ACT OF ACCESSION, III. RIGHT OF ESTABLISHMENT AND FREEDOM TO PROVIDE SERVICES, C) COMPANY LAW **

*
Official Journal L 291 , 19/11/1979 P. 0089 *

+++++

1 . FIRST COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 68/151/EEC OF 9 MARCH 1968 ( OJ NO L 65 , 14 . 3 . 1968 , P . 8 ) .

THE FOLLOWING IS ADDED TO THE END OF ARTICLE 1 :

" - IN GREECE : ] ( . . . ) " .

ARTICLE 2 ( 1 ) ( F ) IS REPLACED BY THE FOLLOWING :

" ( F ) THE BALANCE SHEET AND THE PROFIT AND LOSS ACCOUNT FOR EACH FINANCIAL YEAR . THE DOCUMENT CONTAINING THE BALANCE SHEET MUST GIVE DETAILS OF THE PERSONS WHO ARE REQUIRED BY LAW TO CERTIFY IT . HOWEVER , IN RESPECT OF THE " GESELLSCHAFT MIT BESCHRAENKTER HAFTUNG " , " SOCIETE DE PERSONNES A RESPONSABILITE LIMITEE " , " PERSONENVENNOOTSCHAP MET BEPERKTE AANSPRAKELIJKHEID " , " SOCIETE A RESPONSABILITE LIMITEE " AND " SOCIETA A RESPONSABILITA LIMITATA " UNDER GERMAN , BELGIAN , FRENCH , GREEK , ITALIAN OR LUXEMBOURG LAW REFERRED TO IN ARTICLE 1 , THE " BESLOTEN NAAMLOZE VENNOOTSCHAP " UNDER NETHERLANDS LAW , THE PRIVATE COMPANY UNDER THE LAW OF IRELAND AND THE PRIVATE COMPANY UNDER THE LAW OF NORTHERN IRELAND , THE COMPULSORY APPLICATION OF THIS PROVISION SHALL BE POSTPONED UNTIL THE DATE OF IMPLEMENTATION OF A DIRECTIVE CONCERNING COORDINATION OF THE CONTENTS OF BALANCE SHEETS AND OF PROFIT AND LOSS ACCOUNTS AND CONCERNING EXEMPTION OF SUCH OF THOSE COMPANIES WHOSE BALANCE SHEET TOTAL IS LESS THAN THAT SPECIFIED IN THE DIRECTIVE FROM THE OBLIGATION TO MAKE DISCLOSURE IN FULL OR IN PART OF THE SAID DOCUMENTS . THE COUNCIL WILL ADOPT SUCH A DIRECTIVE WITHIN TWO YEARS FOLLOWING ADOPTION OF THE PRESENT DIRECTIVE . "

2 . SECOND COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 77/91/EEC OF 13 DECEMBER 1976 ( OJ NO L 26 , 31 . 1 . 1977 , P . 1 ) .

THE FOLLOWING IS ADDED TO THE END OF ARTICLE 1 :

" - IN GREECE :

] ( . . . ) " .

3 . THIRD COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 78/855/EEC OF 9 OCTOBER 1978 ( OJ NO L 295 , 20 . 10 . 1978 , P . 36 ) .

THE FOLLOWING IS ADDED AT THE END OF ARTICLE 1 :

" - IN GREECE :

] ( . . . ) " .

4 . FOURTH COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 78/660/EEC OF 25 JULY 1978 ( OJ NO L 222 , 14 . 8 . 1978 , P . 11 ) .

THE FOLLOWING IS ADDED AT THE END OF ARTICLE 1 :

" - IN GREECE :

] ( . . . ) " .
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                            8796
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  8796
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    8796
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           250
<OTHER-SE>                                       44800
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      8796
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  4983
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (4983)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (4983)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (0.001)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.001)


</TABLE>