alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: Jacquelyn Lopez

To: Evan Christopher; Jonathan Peterson; Kaveri Sharma

Cc: Neven Stipanovic; Robert Knop; Terrell Stansbury; Donna Mitchell

Subject: RE: AOR 2023-09 (Senator Catherine Cortez Masto) - Request from Commissioner

Date: Tuesday, November 21, 2023 4:21:35 PM

Hi Evan,

There is no intent currently to make any independent expenditures in support of or opposition to

nonfederal candidates.

Thanks,

Jackie

Jacquelyn (“Jackie”) Lopez

Elias Law Group LLP

Partner

250 Mass. Ave NW Ste 400

Washington DC 20001

202-968-4514

jlopez@elias.law

CONFIDENTIAL: This email may contain privileged or confidential information and is for the sole use of the intended

recipient(s). Any unauthorized use or disclosure of this communication is prohibited. If you believe that you have received

this email in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete it from your system

From: Evan Christopher <EChristopher@fec.gov> 

Sent: Friday, November 17, 2023 12:53 PM

To: Jacquelyn Lopez <jlopez@elias.law>; Jonathan Peterson <jpeterson@elias.law>; Kaveri Sharma

<ksharma@elias.law>

Cc: Neven Stipanovic <NStipanovic@fec.gov>; Robert Knop <rknop@fec.gov>; Terrell Stansbury

<TStansbury@fec.gov>; Donna Mitchell <DMitchell@fec.gov>

Subject: AOR 2023-09 (Senator Catherine Cortez Masto) - Request from Commissioner

Ms. Lopez:

We received a request from a Commissioner for more information about Sen. Cortez Masto’s

request to establish a Nevada state political committee to “raise and spend funds exclusively for

Nevada nonfederal election activities, including activities such as contributing to state and local

candidates running for office in Nevada and spending in connection with state ballot initiatives.”

AOR001.

Specifically, the Commissioner has asked whether the entity the Requestor has proposed intends to

engage only in the activities enumerated in the request—that is, contributions to nonfederal

candidates and state ballot initiatives—or whether the proposed entity intends to make

independent expenditures in support of or opposition to nonfederal candidates.

Please let us know if we can answer any questions or provide any additional information about this

request.
Thank you,

Evan R. Christopher

Attorney | Policy Division

Office of General Counsel

Federal Election Commission
Case 16-26011 Doc 1 Filed 08/12/16 Entered 08/12/16 18:04:09 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 8
Case 16-26011 Doc 1 Filed 08/12/16 Entered 08/12/16 18:04:09 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 8
Case 16-26011 Doc 1 Filed 08/12/16 Entered 08/12/16 18:04:09 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 8
Case 16-26011 Doc 1 Filed 08/12/16 Entered 08/12/16 18:04:09 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 8
Case 16-26011 Doc 1 Filed 08/12/16 Entered 08/12/16 18:04:09 Desc Main

 Document Page 5 of 8
Case 16-26011 Doc 1 Filed 08/12/16 Entered 08/12/16 18:04:09 Desc Main

 Document Page 6 of 8
Case 16-26011 Doc 1 Filed 08/12/16 Entered 08/12/16 18:04:09 Desc Main

 Document Page 7 of 8
Case 16-26011 Doc 1 Filed 08/12/16 Entered 08/12/16 18:04:09 Desc Main

 Document Page 8 of 8
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-6733

JOHN L. SHERER,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.

(CA-00-664-7)

Submitted: August 23, 2001 Decided: August 30, 2001

Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John L. Sherer, Appellant Pro Se. Robert H. Anderson, III, OFFICE

OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

John L. Sherer appeals the district court’s order denying

relief without prejudice on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition

claiming that he has been denied the right to a speedy trial. Even

if the district court had jurisdiction over Sherer’s pretrial

habeas corpus petition, Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court, 410

U.S. 484, 489 (1973), Sherer has been declared incompetent so it

would not be possible to move forward with the trial. Accordingly,

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# EUR-Lex - 12004V108 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V108

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART II — THE CHARTER OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THE UNION - TITLE VI — JUSTICE - Article II-108 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0052 - 0052 *

Article II-108

Presumption of innocence and right of defence

1. Everyone who has been charged shall be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law.

2. Respect for the rights of the defence of anyone who has been charged shall be guaranteed.

--------------------------------------------------
EXHIBIT 32.2



                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Medical Makeover  Corporation of
America (the  "Company")  on Form 10-Q for the quarter  ending March 31, 2004 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Periodic Report"), I, Dr. Leonard I. Weinstein, Chief Accounting Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18.U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1. The Periodic  Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ DR. LEONARD I. WEINSTEIN
---------------------------------
Dr. Leonard I. Weinstein
Chief Accounting Officer

Date: August 30, 2004



     This  certification  accompanies  the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and  shall not be deemed  filed by the  Company  for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

     A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906, or
other  document  authenticating,   acknowledging,   or  otherwise  adopting  the
signature  that  appears in typed form  within  the  electronic  version of this
written statement  required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and  furnished  to the  Securities  and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 91.22 Display of contest entries.

The Federal Duck Stamp Office assigns all eligible entries a number as entries are received. That office displays the entries in numerical order at the contest site.

[71 FR 39015, July 11, 2006]
# EUR-Lex - 12004V378 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V378

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART III — THE POLICIES AND FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - TITLE VI — THE FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - CHAPTER I — PROVISIONS GOVERNING THE INSTITUTIONS - Section 1 — The institutions - Subsection 5 — The Court of Justice of the European Union - Article III-378 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0163 - 0163 *

Article III-378

Notwithstanding the expiry of the period laid down in Article III-365(6), any party may, in proceedings in which an act of general application adopted by an institution, body, office or agency of the Union is at issue, plead the grounds specified in Article III-365(2) in order to invoke before the Court of Justice of the European Union the inapplicability of that act.

--------------------------------------------------
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1

                         GLOBAL BEVERAGE SOLUTIONS, INC.
               FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2006
                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Richard T. Clark, certify that

     1.   I am the Chief Executive Officer of Global Beverage Solutions, Inc.
     2.   Attached to this certification is Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
          September 30, 2006, a periodic report (the "periodic report") filed by
          the issuer with the Securities Exchange Commission pursuant to Section
          13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (the
          "Exchange Act"), which contains financial statements.
     3.   I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
          pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
               o    The periodic report containing the financial statements
                    fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
                    15(d) of the Exchange Act, and
               o    The information in the periodic report fairly presents, in
                    all material respects, the financial condition and results
                    of operations of the issuer for the periods presented.


November 17, 2006                       /s/ Richard T. Clark
                                        -------------------------
                                        Richard T. Clark
                                        Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by Global Beverage Solutions, Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

This certification will not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that
section. This certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference
into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 even if the document with which it is submitted to the Securities and
Exchange Commission is so incorporated by reference.
From: Melgoza, Elizabeth@ARB

To: Ungvarsky, John

Cc: Tasat, Webster@ARB; Lo, Doris; Lee, Anita

Subject: 1-hour Ozone Public Notice

Date: Friday, January 30, 2015 8:59:20 AM

Attachments: NPH_OPlan_09.2013.pdf

NPH_OPLan_09.2013.Postcard.pdf

Hello John,

Here is the District’s public notice for the 1-hour ozone plan.
# EUR-Lex - 12003T041 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12003T041

**Act concerning the conditions of accession of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia and the Slovak Republic and the adjustments to the Treaties on which the European Union is founded - Part four : Temporary provisions - Title II : Other provisions - Article 41 **

*
Official Journal L 236 , 23/09/2003 P. 0046 - 0046 *

Article 41

If transitional measures are necessary to facilitate the transition from the existing regime in the new Member States to that resulting from the application of the common agricultural policy under the conditions set out in this Act, such measures shall be adopted by the Commission in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 42(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector [23], or as appropriate, in the corresponding Articles of the other Regulations on the common organisation of agricultural markets or the relevant committee procedure as determined in the applicable legislation. The transitional measures referred to in this Article may be taken during a period of three years following the date of accession and their application shall be limited to that period. The Council, acting unanimously on a proposal from the Commission and after consulting the European Parliament, may extend this period.

The transitional measures relating to implementation of the instruments concerning the common agricultural policy not specified in this Act which are required as a result of accession shall be adopted prior to the date of accession by the Council acting by a qualified majority on a proposal from the Commission or, where they affect instruments initially adopted by the Commission, they shall be adopted by the Commission in accordance with the procedure required for adopting the instruments in question.

[23] OJ L 178, 30.6.2001, p. 1.

--------------------------------------------------
§ 635.70 Penalties. ( a ) *General.* See § 600.735 of this chapter.
( b ) *Civil procedures for Atlantic tuna.* Because of the perishable nature of Atlantic tuna when it is not chilled or frozen, an authorized officer may cause to be sold, for not less than its reasonable market value, unchilled or unfrozen Atlantic tuna that may be seized and forfeited under ATCA and this part.
#### Rosemarie Golebiewski, Respondent, *v.*Great Eastern Insurance Company, Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

January 8, 1969.

*Stetter <& Levy (Alan C. Levy*of counsel), for appellant. *Red-leaf S Ain (Gilbert T. Redleaf*of counsel), for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with $25 costs.

Concur — Markowitz, Hoestadter and Streit, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5004 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5004

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that a consent to 
   waive a survivor annuity form of retirement benefit shall also be 
                   effective if made before marriage.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            August 19, 1994

 Mrs. Johnson of Connecticut introduced the following bill; which was 
referred jointly to the Committees on Ways and Means and Education and 
                                 Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that a consent to 
   waive a survivor annuity form of retirement benefit shall also be 
                   effective if made before marriage.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WAIVER OF SURVIVOR ANNUITY FORM OF RETIREMENT BENEFIT MAY BE 
              MADE BEFORE MARRIAGE.

    (a) Amendment of Internal Revenue Code.--Paragraph (2) of section 
417(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to definitions 
and special rules for purposes of minimum survivor annuity 
requirements) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
sentence: ``A consent by an individual who becomes the spouse of the 
participant shall be effective with respect to such individual if such 
consent meets the requirements of subparagraph (A) (determined by 
treating such individual as the spouse of the participant) and such 
consent is made within 1 year before the date such individual becomes 
the spouse of the participant.''
    (b) Amendment of ERISA.--Paragraph (2) of section 205(c) of the 
Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (relating to 
requirement of joint and survivor annuity and preretirement survivor 
annuity) is amended by adding at the end the following new sentence: 
``A consent by an individual who becomes the spouse of the participant 
shall be effective with respect to such individual if such consent 
meets the requirements of subparagraph (A) (determined by treating such 
individual as the spouse of the participant) and such consent is made 
within 1 year before the date such individual becomes the spouse of the 
participant.''
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to consents made after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

May 27, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
136014 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 136014 COA: 274422 Wayne CC: 06-008033-01 SEAN T. SMITH, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 24, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

l0519 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 27, 2008

Clerk
**Exhibit32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Immediatek,Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, Phillip Miller, Chief Financial Officer, and Principal Accountingand Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to myknowledge:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as applicable; and

 

(2)           The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

 

 
| /S/ Phillip Miller                                                                   |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Phillip Miller                                                                       |
|   Chief Financial Officer, and Principal  Accounting and Financial Officer |
|                                                                                 |
| Dated:  May  14, 2004                                                           |
|                                                                                 |

 

----
#### §§ 665.429-665.439 [Reserved]
Case 16-24297    Doc 49    Filed 11/20/17    Entered 11/20/17 10:55:39    Desc Main Document      Page 1 of 12

Case 16-24297    Doc 49    Filed 11/20/17    Entered 11/20/17 10:55:39    Desc Main Document      Page 2 of 12

Case 16-24297    Doc 49    Filed 11/20/17    Entered 11/20/17 10:55:39    Desc Main Document      Page 3 of 12

Case 16-24297    Doc 49    Filed 11/20/17    Entered 11/20/17 10:55:39    Desc Main Document      Page 4 of 12

Case 16-24297    Doc 49    Filed 11/20/17    Entered 11/20/17 10:55:39    Desc Main Document      Page 5 of 12

Case 16-24297    Doc 49    Filed 11/20/17    Entered 11/20/17 10:55:39    Desc Main Document      Page 6 of 12

Case 16-24297    Doc 49    Filed 11/20/17    Entered 11/20/17 10:55:39    Desc Main Document      Page 7 of 12

Case 16-24297    Doc 49    Filed 11/20/17    Entered 11/20/17 10:55:39    Desc Main Document      Page 8 of 12

Case 16-24297    Doc 49    Filed 11/20/17    Entered 11/20/17 10:55:39    Desc Main Document      Page 9 of 12

Case 16-24297    Doc 49    Filed 11/20/17    Entered 11/20/17 10:55:39    Desc Main Document      Page 10 of 12

Case 16-24297    Doc 49    Filed 11/20/17    Entered 11/20/17 10:55:39    Desc Main Document      Page 11 of 12

Case 16-24297    Doc 49    Filed 11/20/17    Entered 11/20/17 10:55:39    Desc Main Document      Page 12 of 12
§ 221.24 Can a hearing process be stayed to allow for settlement discussions? ( a ) Prior to referral to the ALJ, the hearing requester and NOAA may by agreement stay the hearing process under this subpart for a period not to exceed 120 days to allow for settlement discussions, if the stay period and any subsequent hearing process (if required) can be accommodated within the time frame established for the license proceeding.
( b ) Any stay of the hearing process will not affect the deadline for filing a notice of intervention and response, if any, pursuant to § 221.22(a)(1)(ii).
**Exhibit31.1**

 

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

I,Zach Bair, certify that:

 

Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Immediatek, Inc.;

Basedon my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterlyreport;

Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant asof, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRule 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidating subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this quarterly report was prepared;

evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as ofthe end of the period covered by this quarterly report  (the “Evaluation Date”); and presented in this quarterly report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and proceduresbased on the required evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation, to the   registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors  (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):

allsignificant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls whichcould adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarizeand report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors anymaterial weaknesses in internal controls; and

anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and

Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterlyreport whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or inother factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent tothe date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions withregard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

 
| Date:  | November 14,  2003                                |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |                                              |
|   | /s/ Zach  Bair                                    |   |
|   | Zach Bair,  President and Chief Executive Officer |
|   | (Principal Executive Officer)                     |

 

----