alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Yvette R. Biron *vs.*Joseph L. Biron.

DECEMBER 10, 1945.

Present: Flynn, C. J.,- Moss, Capotosto, Baker and Condon, JJ.

Capotosto, J.

The petitioner filed her petition for divorce on the ground of extreme cruelty and upon a hearing thereon in the superior court the same was denied. To this decision exception was duly taken by the petitioner and the case is now before us on that single exception.

It is well established with us that in a divorce case the findings of the trial justice upon conflicting evidence will not be disturbed by this court unless they are found to be clearly wrong. *Tremblay*v. *Tremblay,*59 R. I. 401. The petitioner here contends that the evidence for the respondent was unworthy of any credence and that, therefore, her evidence stood uncontradicted and unimpeached. In sub*330stance and effect, she contends that there is no conflicting-evidence and that therefore she has made out a case entitling her to a divorce.

*Corcoran, Foley & Flynn, Joseph F. Flynn,*for petitioner.

*Crowe & Hetherington, Thomas Hetherington,*for respondent.

A mere outline in general terms of the evidence is sufficient for our purpose. The parties were married in 1929 and have two children, both girls. The testimony for the petitioner shows that at times the respondent evidenced fits of temper in various ways and that on one occasion he slapped her and on another occasion he kicked her, the last two mentioned incidents occurring about eight months apart. She testified that respondent’s actions made her “very nervous”, but there is no medical evidence that she was in such condition. The respondent, on the other hand, admits that unpleasant situations developed from time to time between himself and his wife but denies that he ever slapped or kicked her. He lays his domestic troubles mainly to the interference in his family affairs by his wife’s sister, who was not friendly to him.

The evidence, when read as a whole, is conflicting on controlling points and fairly open to different and opposite inferences. The trial justice, who had the advantage over us of observing the parties and their witnesses while testifying, denied the petition in a decision from the bench, saying .that he failed “to see where the petition has been substantiated.” In these circumstances, we cannot say that his decision was clearly wrong.

The petitioner’s exception, therefore, is overruled and the case is remitted to the superior court for further proceedings.
# States - Delta Regional Authority

- Alabama The post Alabama appeared first on Delta Regional Authority.
- Arkansas The post Arkansas appeared first on Delta Regional Authority.
- Illinois The post Illinois appeared first on Delta Regional Authority.
- Kentucky The post Kentucky appeared first on Delta Regional Authority.
- Louisiana The post Louisiana appeared first on Delta Regional Authority.
- Mississippi The post Mississippi appeared first on Delta Regional Authority.
- Missouri The post Missouri appeared first on Delta Regional Authority.
- Tennessee The post Tennessee appeared first on Delta Regional Authority.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001083446
<NAME> SICLONE INDUSTRIES, INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           3,806
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,806
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,806
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,500
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        23,810
<OTHER-SE>                                    (24,504)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,806
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,040
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,040)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,040)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,040)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00


</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 648
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 648 appear at 62 FR 14651, Mar. 27, 1997.

§ 648.1 Purpose and scope. ( a ) This part implements the fishery management plans (FMPs) for the Atlantic mackerel, Atlantic chub mackerel, longfin squid, *Illex* squid, and butterfish fisheries (Mackerel, Squid, and Butterfish FMP); Atlantic salmon (Atlantic Salmon FMP); the Atlantic sea scallop fishery (Scallop FMP); the Atlantic surfclam and ocean quahog fisheries (Atlantic Surfclam and Ocean Quahog FMP); the NE multispecies and monkfish fisheries ((NE Multispecies FMP) and (Monkfish FMP)); the summer flounder, scup, and black sea bass fisheries (Summer Flounder, Scup, and Black Sea Bass FMP); the Atlantic bluefish fishery (Atlantic Bluefish FMP); the Atlantic herring fishery (Atlantic Herring FMP); the spiny dogfish fishery (Spiny Dogfish FMP); the Atlantic deep-sea red crab fishery (Deep-Sea Red Crab FMP); the golden and blueline tilefish fisheries (Tilefish FMP); and the NE skate complex fisheries (Skate FMP). These FMPs and the regulations in this part govern the conservation and management of the above named fisheries of the Northeastern United States.
( b ) This part governs domestic fishing only. Foreign fishing is governed under subpart F of part 600 of this chapter.
[61 FR 34968, July 3, 1996, as amended at 61 FR 43424, Aug. 23, 1996; 62 FR 13299, Mar. 20, 1997; 65 FR 1568, Jan. 11, 2000; 65 FR 77464, Dec. 11, 2000; 66 FR 49192, Sept. 26, 2001; 67 FR 63229, Oct. 10, 2002; 68 FR 49699, Aug. 19, 2003; 76 FR 60649, Sept. 29, 2011; 82 FR 52855, Nov. 15, 2017; 85 FR 47109, Aug. 4, 2020]
Case 16-00543 Doc 8 Filed 10/27/16 Entered 10/28/16 10:03:29 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 4
Case 16-00543 Doc 8 Filed 10/27/16 Entered 10/28/16 10:03:29 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 4
Case 16-00543 Doc 8 Filed 10/27/16 Entered 10/28/16 10:03:29 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 4
Case 16-00543 Doc 8 Filed 10/27/16 Entered 10/28/16 10:03:29 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 4
# United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 19-3444

___________________________ Clay Chastain, lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant ,

v. JCK Legacy GUC Recovery Trustee, lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee .

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City

____________ Submitted: September 24, 2021 Filed: September 30, 2021 [Unpublished]

____________ Before COLLOTON, GRUENDER, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM. In this diversity case, Clay Chastain appeals an order of the district court 1 dismissing his defamation action. After careful review of the record and the parties’

1 The Honorable David Gregory Kays, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.arguments on appeal, we conclude that the dismissal was proper for the reasons

explained by the district court. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

-2-
On appellant’s motion for reconsideration filed October 7, 1993,

reconsideration alllowed; opinion (116 Or App 381, 840 P2d 1376 (1992)) withdrawn; reversed January 19,

petition for review denied March 8, 1994 (318 Or 459)

#### MARGERY LORRAINE BURNAM, *Respondent, v.*STATE OF OREGON, *Appellant.*

(9005161 CV; CA A66808)

866 P2d 523

Nancy Nickel *contra.*

PER CURIAM

Reconsideration allowed; opinion withdrawn; reversed. *Goodwin v. State of Oregon,*125 Or App 359, 866 P2d 466 (1993).
EXHIBIT  99.1

                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                    As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
                          Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002

In  connection  with  the  Annual  Report  of  American  Income  Fund  I-D,  a
Massachusetts  Limited Partnership Liquidating Trust (the "Trust"), on Form 10-K
for  the  period  ended  September  30,  2002  as  filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission  on  the  date  hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, the
Chief  Executive  Officer  of  the Trust, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350  as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

(1)     the Report of the Trust filed today fully complies with the requirements
of  Section  13(a)  or  15  (d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934; and

     (2)     the  information  contained  in  the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Trust.

                    /s/  Gary  D.  Engle
                    --------------------
                    Gary  D.  Engle
                    President  (Chief  Executive  Officer)
Equis  Corporation, as Manager of the Trust, under a Liquidating Trust Agreement
dated  as  of  July  18,  2002,  Wilmington  Trust  Company,  as Trustee and not
Individually

                    March  31,  2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FROM THE
COMPANY'S REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 29, 1996 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-29-1996
<CASH>                                           6,333
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,764
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     40,070
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                64,887
<PP&E>                                         165,440
<DEPRECIATION>                                  28,142
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 240,405
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           73,606
<BONDS>                                         72,395
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          1
<COMMON>                                           691
<OTHER-SE>                                      54,592
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   240,405
<SALES>                                        849,197
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               861,642
<CGS>                                          702,862
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  820,296
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                48,134
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,630
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (15,418)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (343)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (15,075)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (15,075)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.23)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      I, Dr. Jacob D. Dustin, Vice President, Secretary, and Treasurer of
Intrepid Technology & Resources Inc., (the "Company"), do hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

      (a) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter
ended September 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (b) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: November 13, 2002

/s/ Dr. Jacob D. Dustin
----------------------------------------
Jacob D. Dustin
Vice President, Secretary, and Treasurer
§ 221.25 How will NOAA respond to any hearing requests? ( a ) *General.* Within 50 days after the deadline in § 221.21(a)(2) or 30 days after the expiration of any stay period under § 221.24, whichever is later, NOAA may file with the Office of Habitat Conservation an answer to any hearing request under § 221.21.
( b ) *Content.* If NOAA files an answer: ( 1 ) For each of the numbered factual issues listed under § 221.21(b)(1), the answer must explain NOAA's position with respect to the issues of material fact raised by the requester, including one or more of the following statements as appropriate: ( i ) That NOAA is willing to stipulate to the facts as alleged by the requester;
( ii ) That NOAA believes the issue listed by the requester is not a factual issue, explaining the basis for such belief;
( iii ) That NOAA believes the issue listed by the requester is not material, explaining the basis for such belief; or
( iv ) That NOAA agrees that the issue is factual, material, and in dispute.
( 2 ) The answer must also indicate whether the hearing request will be consolidated with one or more other hearing requests under § 221.23 and, if so: ( i ) Identify any other hearing request that will be consolidated with this hearing request; and
( ii ) State which Department will conduct the hearing and provide contact information for the appropriate Department hearings component.
( 3 ) If NOAA plans to rely on any scientific studies, literature, and other documented information that are not already in the license proceeding record, it must provide a copy with its answer.
( 4 ) The answer must also indicate whether or not NOAA consents to service by electronic means under § 221.13(c)(4) and, if so, by what means.
( c ) *Witnesses and exhibits.* NOAA's answer must also list the witnesses and exhibits that it intends to present at the hearing, other than solely for impeachment purposes. ( 1 ) For each witness listed, NOAA must provide: ( i ) His or her name, address, telephone number, and qualifications; and
( ii ) A brief narrative summary of his or her expected testimony.
( 2 ) For each exhibit listed, NOAA must specify whether it is in the license proceeding record.
( d ) *Page limits.* ( 1 ) For each disputed factual issue, the information provided under paragraph (b)(1) of this section may not exceed two pages.
( 2 ) For each witness, the information provided under paragraph (c)(1) of this section may not exceed one page.
( e ) *Notice in lieu of answer.* If NOAA elects not to file an answer to a hearing request: ( 1 ) NOAA is deemed to agree that the issues listed by the requester are factual, material, and in dispute;
( 2 ) NOAA may file a list of witnesses and exhibits with respect to the request only as provided in § 221.42(b); and
( 3 ) NOAA must file a notice containing the information required by paragraph (b)(2) of this section, if the hearing request will be consolidated with one or more other hearing requests under § 221.23, and the statement required by paragraph (b)(4) of this section.
**EXHIBIT 10.21**

**FORM OF AWARD AGREEMENT TO CHAIRMAN**

**UNDER SECTION 11 OF THE XTO ENERGY INC. 2004 STOCK INCENTIVEPLAN,**

**AS AMENDED AND RESTATED AS OF MAY 20, 2008**

THIS AGREEMENT is entered into this      day of             , 200  , between XTO Energy Inc., a Delawarecorporation (herein called “Company”), and                              (herein called“Grantee”), pursuant to the provisions of the XTO Energy Inc. 2004 Stock Incentive Plan, as Amended and Restated as of May 20, 2008 (the “Plan”). The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company (the“Committee”) has determined that Grantee is eligible to be a participant in the Plan and, to carry out its purposes, has this day authorized the grant, pursuant to the Plan, of the shares set forth below to Grantee. 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained, the parties do hereby agree as follows: 

1. **Grant of Shares**. Subject to all of the terms, conditions, and provisions of the Plan and of this Agreement, the Company herebygrants to Grantee under Section 11 of the Plan              shares of the common stock of the Company, of the par value of one cent ($0.01) per share (“Common Stock”), whichshares shall consist of authorized but unissued shares or issued shares reacquired by the Company. Such shares are being issued under Section 11 of the Plan. 

2. **Vesting**. All shares granted herein shall vest immediately. 

3. **Grantee’s Agreement**. Grantee expressly and specifically agrees that, with respect to the calendar year in which such shares are granted, Grantee shall include in his gross income for federal income tax purposes the fairmarket value of the shares. 

 

1 

4. **Other Terms, Conditions, and Provisions**. As noted above, the shares hereingranted by the Company to Grantee are granted subject to all of the terms, conditions and provisions of the Plan. Grantee hereby acknowledges receipt of a copy of the Plan and Plan prospectus and hereby consents to receive any updates to the Plan orPlan prospectus electronically. The parties agree that the entire text of the Plan is incorporated by reference as if copied herein. Reference is made to the Plan for a full description of the rights of Grantee and all of the other terms, conditionsand provisions of the Plan applicable to the shares granted herein. If any of the provisions of this Agreement vary from or are in conflict with the Plan, the provisions of the Plan will be controlling. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement is executed and entered into effective on the day and year first above expressed. 

 

XTO ENERGY INC.

By:
 
 

Name:
 
Title:
 
GRANTEE

 

 

2
From: Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US

To: "King, Heidi R." <Heidi_R._King@omb.eop.gov>

Cc: Deirdre Murphy/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Karen Martin/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Lewis Weinstock/RTP/USEPA/US@EP

Date: 01/26/2011 12:42 PM

Subject: RE: Final editorial interagency comment on CO NAAQS draft

Thanks Heidi for making yourself available all day today.
§ 23.9 Incorporation by reference. Certain material is incorporated by reference into this part with the approval of the Director of the Federal Register under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. All approved material is available for inspection at U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, International Affairs, Division of Management Authority, 703-358-2104 and is available from the sources listed elsewhere in this section. It is also available for inspection at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, email *fr.inspection@nara.gov* or go to *www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html .* ( a ) International Air Transport Association (IATA), 800 Place Victoria, P.O. Box 113, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H4Z 1M1, 1-800-716-6326, *www.iata.org .* ( 1 ) *Live Animals Regulations (LAR) 48th edition,* effective January 1, 2022, into §§ 23.23, 23.26, and 23.56.
( 2 ) *Perishable Cargo Regulations (PCR) 21st edition,* effective January 1, 2022, into §§ 23.23, 23.26, and 23.56.
( b ) CITES Secretariat: Palais des Nations, Avenue de la Paix 8-14, 1211 Genève 10, Switzerland; telephone +41-(0)22-917-81-39/40; email *info@cites.org , www.cites.org .* ( 1 ) *CITES Guidelines for the non-air transport of live wild animals and plants,* effective January 2, 2017, into §§ 23.23, 23.26, and 23.56, available for downloading at ( i ) *https://cites.org/eng/resources/transport/index.php*
( ii ) *https://www.fws.gov/international/travel-and-trade/live-animal-transport.html*
( 2 ) [Reserved]
[87 FR 10079, Feb. 23, 2022]
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 175 (Monday, September 11, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 53453-53454]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-7596]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RETIREMENT THRIFT INVESTMENT BOARD


Sunshine Act Notice

Time and Date: 9 a.m. (EDT) September 18, 2006.

Place: 4th Floor Conference Room, 1250 H Street, NW., Washington, DC.

Status: Parts will be open to the public and parts closed to the 
public.

Matters to be Considered: 

Parts Open to the Public

    1. Approval of the minutes of the August 21, 2006 Board member 
meeting.
    2. Thrift Savings Plan activity report by the Executive Director.
    3. Annual budget report.

[[Page 53454]]

    4. Barclays and Watson Wyatt announcements.

Parts Closed to the Public

    5. Procurement.
    6. Personnel.

Contact Person for More Information: Thomas J. Trabucco, Director, 
Office of External Affairs, (202) 942-1640.

    Dated: September 7, 2006.
Thomas K. Emswiler,
Secretary to the Board, Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board.
[FR Doc. 06-7596 Filed 9-7-06; 1:54 pm]
BILLING CODE 6760-01-P
Case 16-28585 Doc 16 Filed 09/26/16 Entered 09/27/16 09:25:35 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1