alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 19-1285V

UNPUBLISHED

BRENDA TATRO,

Trustee of the Sally J. Silver

Revocable Trust

 Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES,

 Respondent.

Chief Special Master Corcoran 

Filed: September 28, 2021

Special Processing Unit (SPU); 

Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;

Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;

Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine 

Administration (SIRVA)

Christine M. Smith, Law Office of Christine M. Smith, Manchester, NH, for Petitioner.

Laurie Wiesner, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

On August 27, 2019, Sally J. Silver2 filed a petition for compensation under the 

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.3 (the 

“Vaccine Act”). Ms. Silver alleges that she suffered from a shoulder injury related to 

vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) after an influenza (“flu”) vaccination on September 14, 

2017. Petition at ¶1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office 

of Special Masters.

1 Because this unpublished Ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required 

to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-Government Act 

of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government 

Services). This means the Ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance 

with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, 

the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that 

the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 

2 On August 27, 2020, Brenda Tatro, as Trustee of the Sally J. Silver Revocable Trust, was substituted as 

petitioner after Ms. Silver passed away in March of 2020. ECF No. 22.

3 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease 

of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 

300aa (2012).
2

On September 27, 2021, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he

concedes that Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) 

Report at 1. Specifically, Respondent states that “Ms. Silver had no history of pain, 

inflammation, or dysfunction of her right shoulder prior to vaccination that would explain 

her signs, symptoms or findings after vaccination; the onset of pain occurred within 48 

hours after receipt of an intramuscular vaccination; the pain was limited to the shoulder 

where the vaccine was administered; and no other condition or abnormality has been 

identified to explain Ms. Silver’s right shoulder symptoms.” Id. at 5. 

In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that 

Petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Chief Special Master
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

Washington, DC 20463 

1 MEMORANDUM 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

29 

30 

31 

32 

TO: The Coinmission 

FROM: Lisa Stevenson 

Acting General Cotmsei 

Katlileen Guith 

Associate General C^nsel for Enforcement 

Mark Shonkwiler 

Assistant General Coimsel 

Antoinette Fuoto 

Attorney 

SUBJECT: MUR 6920 (American Consei-vative Union, et o/.) 

RE: Proposed Conciliation Agjeement for Probable Cause Conciliation 

Attached is a proposed conciliation agreement for probable cause conciliation with 

American Conservative Union ("ACU"). This agreement is intended for the Commission's 

consideration along with this Office's recommendation that the Commission fmd probable cause 

to believe that ACU violated 52 U.S.C. § 30122 and 11 C.F.R. § ]10.4(b)(l)(ii) that is set foilh 

in our MUR 6920 Meraorandimi to the Coimnission. 
MUR6920 (ACU.efa/.) 

PC CA Memorandum to the Commission 

Page 2 of 2 

1 We recommend that the Commission approve the attached conciliation agreement. 

' 2 

3 RECOMMENDATIONS 

4 

5 1. Approve the attached conciliation agreement. 

6 

7 2. Approve the appropriate letter. 

8 

9 

10 

11
# EUR-Lex - 11965F/PRO/PRI/13 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11965F/PRO/PRI/13

**TREATY ESTABLISHING A SINGLE COUNCIL AND A SINGLE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, PROTOCOL ON THE PRIVILEGES AND IMMUNITIES OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, CHAPTER V: OFFICIALS AND OTHER SERVANTS OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, ARTICLE 13 **

*
Official Journal L 152 , 13/07/1967 P. 0015 *

++++

ARTICLE 13

OFFICIALS AND OTHER SERVANTS OF THE COMMUNITIES SHALL BE LIABLE TO A TAX FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE COMMUNITIES ON SALARIES , WAGES AND EMOLUMENTS PAID TO THEM BY THE COMMUNITIES , IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONDITIONS AND PROCEDURE LAID DOWN BY THE COUNCIL , ACTING ON A PROPOSAL FROM THE COMMISSION .

THEY SHALL BE EXEMPT FROM NATIONAL TAXES ON SALARIES , WAGES AND EMOLUMENTS PAID BY THE COMMUNITIES .
#### § 82.1 Scope of regulations.

The regulations in this part are issued, pursuant to the authority of the Secretary in section 1380 of the Marine Mammal Protection Act, 16 U.S.C. 1361-1407 (Supp. II 1972), to provide procedures for the submission and review of applications and the award and administration of research grants, or other forms of financial assistance, to Federal or state agencies, public or private institutions, or other persons including any foreign governments for research relevant to the protection and conservation of marine mammals.
BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

In the Matter of ) 

) MUR6920 

American Conservative Union, et al; ) 

CERTIFICATION. 

I, Laura E. Sinram, recording secretary of the Federal Election Coimnission executive 

session, do hereby certify that on July 11,2017, the Commission took the following actions in 

the above-captioned matter; 

1. Decided by a vote of 5-0 to: 

a. Substitute the name Government Integrity LLC in the place of "Unknown 

Respondent" in the Commission's previous findings that Unknown 

Respondent violated 52 U.S.C, § 30122 by making a contribution in the name 

of another. 

b. Find reason to believe that Jarries C. Thomas, III knowingly and willfully 

violated 52 U.S.C. § 30122 by knowingly helping or assisting in the making 

of a contribution in the name of another. 

c. Find reason to believe that Now or Never PAC and James C. Thomas, III in. 

his official capacity as treasurer knowingly and willfully viokted 52 U.S.C. § 

30122 and 52 U.S.C. § 30104(b)(3)(A) by accepting a contribution in the 

name of another and failing to properly report that contribution. 

d. Find reason to believe that James C. Thomas, III in his. personal capacity 

knowingly and willfully violated 52 U.S.C. § 30122 and 52 U.S.C. § 

30104(b)(3)(A) by accepting a contribution in the name of another and failing 

to properly report that contribution. 

e. Approve the portions of the Factual and Legal Analyses that pertain to items 

. l(a)-(d) as recommended in the Second General Counsel's Report dated July 

5,2017. 
Federal Election Commission Page 2 

Certification for MUR 6920 

July 11, 2017 

f. Approve the Subpoenas to Produce Documents and Orders to Submit Written 

Answers to James C. Thomas, III, American Conservative Union, and Gregg 

Keller. 

Commissioners Goodman, Hunter, Petersen, Walther, and Weintraub voted affirmatively 

for the decision. 

2. Failed by a vote of 2-2 to: 

a. Find reason to believe that Government Integrity LLC knowingly and 

willfully violated 52 U.S.C. § 30122 by making a contribution in the name of 

another. 

b. Approve the portions of the Factual and Legal Analyses that pertain to item 

2(a) as recommended in the Second General Counsel's Report dated July 5, 

2017. 

Commissioners Walther and Weintraub voted affumatively for the motion. 

Commissioners Hunter and Petersen dissented. Commissioner Goodman abstained. 

3. Decided by a vote of 5-0: 

a. Find reason to believe that Government Integrity LLC violated 52 U.S.C. § 

30122 by making a contribution in the name of another. 

b. Approve the Factual and Legal Analyses as recommended in the Second 

General Counsel's Report dated July 5,2017, 

c. Approve the appropriate letters. 

Commissioners Goodman, Hunter, Petersen, Waltlier, and Weintraub voted affirmatively 

for the decision. 
I . 

Federal Election Conunission 

Certification for MUR 6920 

July 11,2017 

^Iizll7 

Date 

4. 

i 

4 

Page 3 

Attest: 

lE. Sihram 

Acting Deputy Secretary of the 

Commission
# EUR-Lex - 11997E269 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11997E269

**Treaty establishing the European Community (Amsterdam consolidated version) - Part Five: Institutions of the Community - Title II: Financial provisions - Article 269 - Article 201 - EC Treaty (Maastricht consolidated version) - Article 201 - EEC Treaty **

*
Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0287 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0070 - Consolidated version (EEC Treaty - no official publication available) *

Treaty establishing the European Community (Amsterdam consolidated version)

Article 269

Without prejudice to other revenue, the budget shall be financed wholly from own resources.

The Council, acting unanimously on a proposal from the Commission and after consulting the European Parliament, shall lay down provisions relating to the system of own resources of the Community, which it shall recommend to the Member States for adoption in accordance with their respective constitutional requirements.
#### § 260.14 How to make application.

An application for inspection service may be made to the officer of inspection or to any inspector, at or nearest the place where the service is desired. An up-to-date list of the Inspection Field Offices of the Department may be obtained upon request to the Director. Satisfactory proof that the applicant is an interested party shall be furnished.
#### § 25.41 Who issues refuge permits?

We authorize the refuge manager of the facility where an activity is to take place to issue permits required by this subchapter C unless the regulations in this subchapter C require the applicant to obtain the applicable permit from the Director or Secretary. In those situations, the refuge manager will so inform the applicant, giving the applicant all necessary information as to how and where to apply.

[67 FR 58942, Sept. 18, 2002]
# EUR-Lex - 11992E042 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11992E042

**TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY - PART THREE: COMMUNITY POLICIES - TITLE II: AGRICULTURE - ARTICLE 42 /* CODIFIED VERSION OF THE TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY */ **

*
Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0018 *

Article 42

The provisions of the Chapter relating to rules on competition shall apply to production of and trade in agricultural products only to the extent determined by the Council within the framework of Article 43(2) and (3) and in accordance with the procedure laid down therein, account being taken of the objectives set out in Article 39.

The Council may, in particular, authorize the granting of aid:

(a) for the protection of enterprises handicapped by structural or natural conditions;

(b) within the framework of economic development programmes.
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 21-20656

Summary Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Evaristo Mercado-Garcia, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:19-CR-919-6

Before King, Higginson, and Willett, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The attorney appointed to represent Evaristo Mercado-Garcia has 

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders 

v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 

(5th Cir. 2011). Mercado-Garcia has not filed a response. We have reviewed 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 26, 2022

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 21-20656 Document: 00516407116 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/26/2022
No. 21-20656

2

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We 

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous 

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to 

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities 

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Case: 21-20656 Document: 00516407116 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/26/2022
US Department of Transportation 

Docket Management System 

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Dear Sir or Madam, 

This is a request for an amendment to FAA Exemption 11230, Docket No. FAA-2014-0604 and the 

corresponding COA granted to Montico, Inc. to further define uses and additional purposes. 

Montico, Inc. will operate sUAS' for aerial inspection and documentation. Some of the uses will be, but 

not limited to, telecommunication tower facilities, utility power transmission and distribution facilities, 

wind power generation facilities, gas and oil pipeline facilities, bridge infrastructures, aerial mapping and 

agriculture data collection. 

Monti co, Inc. will operate the following additional sUAS': 

Steadidrone "Mavrik" and the Align M690L. Attached are the Flight Operations Manuals for both 

platforms. 

In order to accomplish continuity of services, it is operationally necessary to conduct aerial inspections 

within areas previously restricted in our exemption and COA. We have instituted the following 

operational procedures to mitigate any undue hazards: 

a) The sUAS will clear and yield the right away to all other manned operations and activities at 

all times. 

b) When within 5 nautical miles from an airport having an operational control tower the PIC 

will contact ATC prior to flight. 

c) When within 3 nautical miles from an airport having a published instrument flight 

procedure, but not having an operational control tower the PIC will utilize a VHF air band 

transceiver to announce Monti co's presence. 

d) When within 2 nautical miles from an airport not having a published instrument flight 

procedure or an operational control tower the PIC will utilize a VHF air band transceiver to 

announce Montico's presence. 

e) When within 2 nautical miles from a heliport the PIC will utilize a VHF air band transceiver to 

announce Montico's presence. 

f) When within altitudes between two hundred and four hundred feet, the PIC will contact the 

appropriate ATC prior to flight and/or utilize a VHF air band transceiver to announce 

Montico's presence. 
RonWingo 

Chief Executive Officer 

M NTICO 

INCORPORATED 

The future is here. 

rwingo@montico.net 1 monticoinc.com 1 559.994.5997
§ 665.251 Closed areas. All lobster fishing is prohibited: ( a ) Within 20 nm of Laysan Island.
( b ) Within the EEZ landward of the 10-fathom curve as depicted on National Ocean Survey Charts, Numbers 19022, 19019, and 19016.
Case 16-24059 Doc 5 Filed 07/27/16 Entered 07/27/16 12:23:26 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2
Case 16-24059 Doc 5 Filed 07/27/16 Entered 07/27/16 12:23:26 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2
|   | (1) | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/       Philip D.      Ellett              |   |   |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| Philip      D. EllettChief      Executive OfficerNovember      13, 2008                                            |   |   |   |
EXHIBIT 32.1

                 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350
                       as adopted pursuant to Section 906
                        of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of AngelCiti Entertainment, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, George
Gutierrez, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Dean Ward, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.




Dated: May 23, 2005                 /s/ George Gutierrez
                                    -----------------------------------------
                                    George Gutierrez, Chief Executive Officer


Dated: May 23, 2005                 /s/ Dean Ward
                                    -----------------------------------------
                                    Dean Ward, Chief Financial Officer
Sanitized – Attachment 004 Page 1 of 2Sanitized – Attachment 004 Page 2 of 2
Fill in this information to identify your case:

Debtor 1 Damien R. Paar

First Name Middle Name Last Name

Debtor 2 Nanci V. Paar

(Spouse if, filing) First Name Middle Name Last Name

United States Bankruptcy Court for the: NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Case number

(if known)  Check if this an

amended filing

B 103A 

Application for Individuals to Pay the Filing Fee in Installments 12/15

Be as complete and accurate as possible. If two married people are filing together, both are equally responsible for supplying correct

information.

Part 1: Specify Your Proposed Payment Timetable

1. Which chapter of the Bankruptcy Code are

you choosing to file under?

 Chapter 7

 Chapter 11

 Chapter 12

 Chapter 13

2. You may apply to pay the filing fee in up to

four installments. Fill in the amounts you

propose to pay and the dates you plan to

pay them. Be sure all dates are business

days. Then add the payments you propose

to pay. $ 77.50

 With the filing of the petition

 On or before this date.........

MM / DD/ YYYY

You must propose to pay the entire fee no

later than 120 days after you file this $ 77.50 On or before this date........... 8/26/16

bankruptcy case. If the court approves your MM / DD/ YYYY

application, the court will set your final $ 77.50 On or before this date........... 9/25/16

payment timetable. MM / DD/ YYYY

+ $ 77.50 On or before this date........... 10/25/16

MM / DD/ YYYY

$

310.00

Total Your total must equal the entire fee for the chapter you checked in line 1.

Part 2: Sign Below

By signing here, you state that you are unable to pay the full filing fee at once, that you want to pay the fee in installments, and that you

understand that:

•

You must pay your entire filing fee before you make any more payments or transfer any more property to an attorney, bankruptcy petition

preparer, or anyone else for services in connection with your bankruptcy case.

•

You must pay the entire fee no later than 120 days after you first file for bankruptcy, unless the court later extends your deadline. Your

debts will not be discharged until your entire fee is paid.

•

If you do not make any payment when it is due, your bankruptcy case may be dismissed, and your rights in other bankruptcy proceedings

may be affected.

X /s/ Damien R. Paar X /s/ Nanci V. Paar X /s/ Jeffry A Dahlberg

Damien R. Paar Nanci V. Paar Jeffry A Dahlberg

Signature of Debtor 1 Signature of Debtor 2 Your attorney’s name and signature, if you used one

Date July 23, 2016 Date July 23, 2016 Date July 23, 2016

MM / DD / YYYY MM / DD / YYYY MM/ DD / YYYY

You propose to pay...

B 103A (Official Form 103A) Application for Individuals to Pay the Filing Fee in Installments

Software Copyright (c) 1996-2016 Best Case, LLC - www.bestcase.com Best Case Bankruptcy

Case 16-81780 Doc 2 Filed 07/27/16 Entered 07/27/16 12:09:50 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
Case 16-25577 Doc 1 Filed 08/09/16 Entered 08/09/16 16:03:44 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 9
Case 16-25577 Doc 1 Filed 08/09/16 Entered 08/09/16 16:03:44 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 9
Case 16-25577 Doc 1 Filed 08/09/16 Entered 08/09/16 16:03:44 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 9
Case 16-25577 Doc 1 Filed 08/09/16 Entered 08/09/16 16:03:44 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 9
Case 16-25577 Doc 1 Filed 08/09/16 Entered 08/09/16 16:03:44 Desc Main

 Document Page 5 of 9
Case 16-25577 Doc 1 Filed 08/09/16 Entered 08/09/16 16:03:44 Desc Main

 Document Page 6 of 9
Case 16-25577 Doc 1 Filed 08/09/16 Entered 08/09/16 16:03:44 Desc Main

 Document Page 7 of 9
Case 16-25577 Doc 1 Filed 08/09/16 Entered 08/09/16 16:03:44 Desc Main

 Document Page 8 of 9
Case 16-25577 Doc 1 Filed 08/09/16 Entered 08/09/16 16:03:44 Desc Main

 Document Page 9 of 9
§ 1004.22 Unsafe operation. ( a ) The elements of this section constitute offenses that are less serious than reckless driving. The offense of reckless driving is defined by State law and violations are prosecuted pursuant to the provisions of § 1004.2.
( b ) The following are prohibited: ( 1 ) Operating a motor vehicle without due care or at a speed greater than that which is reasonable and prudent considering wildlife, traffic, weather, road and light conditions and road character.
( 2 ) Operating a motor vehicle in a manner which unnecessarily causes its tires to squeal, skid or break free of the road surface.
( 3 ) Failing to maintain that degree of control of a motor vehicle necessary to avoid danger to persons, property or wildlife.
( 4 ) Operating a motor vehicle while allowing a person to ride: ( i ) On or within any vehicle, trailer or other mode of conveyance towed behind the motor vehicle unless specifically designed for carrying passengers while being towed; or
( ii ) On any exterior portion of the motor vehicle not designed or intended for the use of a passenger. This restriction does not apply to a person seated on the floor of a truck bed equipped with sides, unless prohibited by State law.
Case 16-29760 Doc 13 Filed 09/21/16 Entered 09/22/16 09:20:25 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1