alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT
      31.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRESIDENT**




I,
      Michael Timms, certify that:




1.
      I have
      reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Australian Forest
      Industries;




2.
      Based
      on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement
      of
      a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were
      made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
      report;




3.
      Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects
      the
      financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
      as
      of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;




4.
      I am
      responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
      (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and
      have:




a)
      designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
      information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
      is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
      period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;




b)
      evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
      quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and




c)
      presented in this quarterly report my conclusions about the effectiveness of
      the
      disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation
      Date;




5.
      I have
      disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors
      and
      the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing
      the equivalent functions):




a)
      all
      significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which
      could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize
      and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors
      any
      material weaknesses in internal controls; and




b)
      any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
      who
      have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and




6.
      I have
      indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes
      in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect
      internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent evaluation, including
      any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material
      weaknesses.




Date:
                August 20, 2007/s/
                Michael TimmsName:
                Michael TimmsTitle:
                Chief Executive Officer and President
I

★

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 519

To prohibit grants under the community development block grant program

to communities that fail to adopt a policy of enforcing laws that prevent

the use or threat of force against individuals for exercise of abortion

rights.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 21, 1993

Mrs. LOWEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Banking, Finance and Urban Affairs

A BILL

To prohibit grants under the community development block

grant program to communities that fail to adopt a policy

of enforcing laws that prevent the use or threat of force

against individuals for exercise of abortion rights.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Reproductive Freedom

5 Protection Act’’.
2

•HR 519 IHIS

1 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON CDBG ASSISTANCE.

2 Section 104 of the Housing and Community Develop3 ment Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 5304) is amended by adding

4 at the end the following new subsection:

5 ‘‘(n) PROTECTION OF INDIVIDUALS EXERCISING

6 ABORTION RIGHTS.—

7 ‘‘(1) PROHIBITION OF ASSISTANCE.—The Sec8 retary may not obligate or provide any amounts ap9 propriated to carry out this title, directly or through

10 any State, to any unit of general local government

11 that fails to adopt a policy of enforcing applicable

12 antiharassment laws in effect within such unit of

13 general local government against individuals who

14 violate such laws to prevent any other individual

15 from, or to retaliate against any other individual for,

16 seeking or providing information, advice, treatment,

17 or assistance in connection with an abortion.

18 ‘‘(2) ANTIHARASSMENT LAWS.—For purposes

19 of this subsection, the term ‘antiharassment laws’

20 means laws that prohibit or punish the use of force,

21 the breach of peace, disorderly conduct, criminal

22 trespass, criminal menacing, obstructing passage,

23 stalking (including any willful or malicious following

24 or harassment together with a threat to use force),

25 knowingly or recklessly attempting to put another in
3

•HR 519 IHIS

1 fear of bodily violence, and damaging, destroying, or

2 defacing the real or personal property of another.

3 ‘‘(3) ADMINISTRATION.—The Secretary shall

4 determine whether a unit of general local govern5 ment has failed to adopt a policy of enforcing appli6 cable antiharassment laws for purposes of this sub7 section.’’.

Æ
Exhibit 10.10 - Asset Purchase Agreement and Consulting Contracts between Global Green Solutions Inc. and Chisholm Brothers International





Exhibit 10.10

GLOBAL GREEN SOLUTIONS INC.

Suite 1010-789 West Pender Street

Vancouver, BC

V6C 1H2

Tel: 604-408-0153

Fax: 604-606-7980

December 12, 2006

Chisholm Brothers International ( Bruce and Hugh Chisholm )

Suite 106-212, 16211 Clay Road

Houston, Texas, 77084

Re: Asset Purchase Agreement and Consulting Contracts

The purpose of this letter is to confirm that we have mutually agreed to amend the business relationships which evolved out of the Asset Purchase Agreement dated December 23, 2005 entered into by and between you, Sealweld International Company Ltd. and our Corporation.

Attached to this letter is a term sheet which outlines the terms of our new relationship.

By signing the attached letter in the space indicated, each of you agree that effective January 1, 2007 our business relationship has been revised. On October 31, 2006 your Consulting Agreements were terminated. After that date, the terms of the attached term sheet shall govern our relationship.

We mutually agree to be bound by the term sheet as it has terminated prior agreements and established a new relationship.

Please indicate your acceptance of the terms of the new relationship by signing this letter in the space indicated.

Yours truly;

GLOBAL GREEN SOLUTIONS INC.

R. M. BAKER

Bob Baker, Secretary

By signing below we hereby acknowledge and agree that the provisions of the term sheet shall govern our new business relationship.

	BRUCE CHISHOLM		HUGH CHISHOLM
	Bruce Chisholm 	 	Hugh Chisholm 
	Chisholm Brothers International 	 	Chisholm Brothers International
1

The HONORABLE RICHARD G. KOPF, Chief Judge, United States District

Court for the District of Nebraska.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 99-3797

___________

Theresa L. Hermes, *

 *

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of Nebraska.

State of Nebraska, acting through the *

Department of Public Institutions, * [UNPUBLISHED]

Western Nebraska Veterans& Home, *

 *

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: July 31, 2000

 Filed: August 3, 2000

___________

Before BEAM, FAGG, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges. 

___________

PER CURIAM.

Theresa L. Hermes commenced this action alleging violations of the Americans

with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. § 12112, et seq., by the State of Nebraska

Department of Public Institutions. The district court1

 dismissed the action, and denied

Hermes’s motion for a new trial, based upon this court’s decision that the States and

their instrumentalities are entitled to Eleventh Amendment immunity from actions under
-2-

Title II of the ADA. See Alsbrook v. City of Maumelle, 184 F.3d 999, 1010 (8th Cir.

1999) (en banc), cert. dismissed, 120 S. Ct. 1265 (2000). Hermes appeals. Concluding

the district court properly applied our controlling decision in Alsbrook, and did not

abuse its discretion in denying Hermes’s motion for a new trial, we affirm.

A true copy.

Attest:

 CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4986

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the deductibility

of business meal expenses for individuals who are subject to Federal

hours of limitation.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 18, 1994

Mr. JEFFERSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase

the deductibility of business meal expenses for individuals

who are subject to Federal hours of limitation.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. INCREASED DEDUCTIBILITY OF BUSINESS

4 MEAL EXPENSES FOR INDIVIDUALS SUBJECT

5 TO FEDERAL HOURS OF SERVICE.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 274(n) of the Internal

7 Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to only 50 percent of meal

8 and entertainment expenses allowed as deduction) is
2

•HR 4986 IH

1 amended by adding at the end the following new

2 paragraph:

3 ‘‘(3) SPECIAL RULE FOR INDIVIDUALS SUBJECT

4 TO FEDERAL HOURS OF SERVICE.—In the case of

5 any expenses for food or beverages consumed by an

6 individual during, or incident to, the period of duty

7 subject to the hours of service limitations of the

8 Department of Transportation, paragraph (1) shall

9 be applied by substituting ‘80 percent’ for ‘50

10 percent’.’’

11 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

12 subsection (a) shall apply to taxable years beginning after

13 December 31, 1994.

Æ
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5219

To amend the Food Stamp Act of 1977 to permit participating households

to use food stamp benefits to purchase nutritional supplements of vitamins, minerals, or vitamins and minerals.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 6, 1994

Mr. EMERSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Agriculture

A BILL

To amend the Food Stamp Act of 1977 to permit participating households to use food stamp benefits to purchase

nutritional supplements of vitamins, minerals, or vitamins and minerals.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. FINDINGS.

4 The Congress finds the following:

5 (1) The dietary patterns of Americans do not

6 result in nutrient intakes that fully meet Rec7 ommended Dietary Allowances (RDAs) of vitamins

8 and minerals.
2

HR 5219 IH

1 (2) The elderly often fail to achieve adequate

2 nutrient intakes from diet alone.

3 (3) Pregnant women have particularly high nu4 trient needs, which they often fail to meet through

5 dietary means alone.

6 (4) Many scientific studies have shown that nu7 tritional supplements contain folic acid (a B vita8 min) can prevent a large proportion (as many as 70

9 to 80 percent) of neural tube birth defects and the

10 Public Health Service, in September 1992, rec11 ommended that ‘‘all women of childbearing age in

12 the United States who are capable of becoming preg13 nant should consume 0.4 mg of folic acid per day for

14 the purpose of reducing their risk of having a preg15 nancy affected with spina bifida or other neural tube

16 birth defects.’’

17 (5) Infants who fail to receive adequate intakes

18 of iron may be somewhat impaired in their mental

19 and behavioral development.

20 (6) Children in low-income families often fail to

21 achieve nutritional goals from diet alone.

22 (7) A massive volume of evidence strongly sug23 gests that increasing intake of specific nutrients over

24 an extended period of time may be helpful in pro-
3

HR 5219 IH

1 tecting against diseases or conditions such as

2 osteoporosis, cataracts, cancer, and heart disease.

3 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT.

4 Section 3(g)(1) of the Food Stamp Act of 1977 (7

5 U.S.C. 2012(g)(1)) is amended by striking ‘‘or food prod6 uct’’ and inserting ‘‘food product, or nutritional supple7 ments of vitamins, minerals, or vitamins and minerals.’’

Æ
§ 600.503 Vessel and gear identification. ( a ) *Vessel identification.* ( 1 ) The operator of each FFV assigned an IRCS must display that call sign amidships on both the port and starboard sides of the deckhouse or hull, so that it is visible from an enforcement vessel, and on an appropriate weather deck so it is visible from the air.
( 2 ) The operator of each FFV not assigned an IRCS, such as a small trawler associated with a mothership or one of a pair of trawlers, must display the IRCS of the associated vessel, followed by a numerical suffix. (For example, JCZM-1, JCZM-2, etc., would be displayed on small trawlers not assigned an IRCS operating with a mothership whose IRCS is JCZM; JANP-1 would be displayed by a pair trawler not assigned an IRCS operating with a trawler whose IRCS is JANP.)
( 3 ) The vessel identification must be in a color in contrast to the background and must be permanently affixed to the FFV in block Roman alphabet letters and Arabic numerals at least 1 m in height for FFV's over 20 m in length, and at least 0.5 m in height for all other FFV's.
( b ) *Navigational lights and shapes.* Each FFV must display the lights and shapes prescribed by the International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea, 1972 (TIAS 8587, and 1981 amendment TIAS 10672), for the activity in which the FFV is engaged (as described at 33 CFR part 81).
( c ) *Gear identification.* ( 1 ) The operator of each FFV must ensure that all deployed fishing gear that is not physically and continuously attached to an FFV: ( i ) Is clearly marked at the surface with a buoy displaying the vessel identification of the FFV (see paragraph (a) of this section) to which the gear belongs.
( ii ) Has attached a light visible for 2 nautical miles (3.70 km) at night in good visibility.
( iii ) Has a radio buoy. Trawl codends passed from one vessel to another are considered continuously attached gear and are not required to be marked.
( 2 ) The operator of each FFV must ensure that deployed longlines, strings of traps or pots, and gillnets are marked at the surface at each terminal end with: (see paragraphs (c)(1)(i) through (c)(1)(iii) of this section).
( 3 ) Additional requirements may be specified for the fishery in which the vessel is engaged.
( 4 ) Unmarked or incorrectly identified fishing gear may be considered abandoned and may be disposed of in accordance with applicable Federal regulations by any authorized officer.
( d ) *Maintenance.* The operator of each FFV must— ( 1 ) Keep the vessel and gear identification clearly legible and in good repair.
( 2 ) Ensure that nothing on the FFV obstructs the view of the markings from an enforcement vessel or aircraft.
( 3 ) Ensure that the proper navigational lights and shapes are displayed for the FFV's activity and are properly functioning.
# EUR-Lex - 12005SA028 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12005SA028

**Act concerning the conditions of accession of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania and the adjustments to the Treaties on which the European Union is founded - PART FOUR:TEMPORARY PROVISIONS - TITLE III:FINANCIAL PROVISIONS - Article 28 **

*
Official Journal L 157 , 21/06/2005 P. 0213 - 0213 *

Article 28

1. Measures which on the date of accession have been the subject of decisions on assistance under Regulation (EC) No 1267/1999 establishing an Instrument for Structural Policies for Pre-accession and the implementation of which has not been completed by that date shall be considered to have been approved by the Commission under Council Regulation (EC) No 1164/94 of 16 May 1994 establishing a Cohesion Fund [13]. Amounts which still have to be committed for the purpose of implementing such measures shall be committed under the Regulation relating to the Cohesion Fund in force at the date of accession and allocated to the chapter corresponding to that Regulation under the general budget of the European Communities. Unless stated otherwise in paragraphs 2 to 5, the provisions governing the implementation of measures approved pursuant to the latter Regulation shall apply to those measures.

2. Any procurement procedure relating to a measure referred to in paragraph 1 which on the date of accession has already been the subject of an invitation to tender published in the Official Journal of the European Union shall be implemented in accordance with the rules laid down in that invitation to tender. However, the provisions contained in Article 165 of the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities shall not apply. Any procurement procedure relating to a measure referred to in paragraph 1 which has not yet been the subject of an invitation to tender published in the Official Journal of the European Union shall be in keeping with the provisions of the Treaties, with the instruments adopted pursuant thereto and with Community policies, including those concerning environmental protection, transport, trans-European networks, competition and the award of public contracts.

3. Payments made by the Commission under a measure referred to in paragraph 1 shall be posted to the earliest open commitment made in the first instance pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1267/1999, and then pursuant to the Regulation relating to the Cohesion Fund then in force.

4. For the measures referred to in paragraph 1, the rules governing the eligibility of expenditure pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1267/1999 shall remain applicable, except in duly justified cases to be decided on by the Commission at the request of the Member State concerned.

5. The Commission may decide, in exceptional and duly justified cases, to authorise specific exemptions from the rules applicable pursuant to the Regulation relating to the Cohesion Fund in force at the date of accession for the measures referred to in paragraph 1.

[13] OJ L 130, 25.5.1994. Regulation as last amended by the 2003 Act of Accession (OJ L 236, 23.9.2003, p. 33).

--------------------------------------------------
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 19-0547

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v. 

BEAU HERMAN MILLER,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good 

cause appearing, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to 

and including December 30, 2020, within which to prepare, file, and serve 

Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 25 2020

11/25/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0547
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation of our report (which report contains an explanatory paragraph regarding the Company's ability to continue as a going
concern) dated September 15, 2009 relating to the consolidated financial statements of Precision Optics Corporation, Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended June 30, 2009
included in this Form 10-K/A, into the Company's previously filed Registration Statement Nos. 333-35884, 333-87977 and 333-66297 on
Form S-3, Registration Statement Nos. 333-89989, 333-94125, 333-72108, 333-97525, 333-110946 and
333-128628 on Form S-8 and Registration Statement Nos. 333-141358 and 333-136033 on Form SB-2.

/s/
Stowe & Degon LLC

May 14,
2010
Leominster, Massachusetts

---



QuickLinks
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 549 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 549

 To amend the formula for determining the Official Mail Allowance for 
                    Members, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 21, 1993

  Mr. Upton introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the formula for determining the Official Mail Allowance for 
                    Members, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FORMULA FOR DETERMINING OFFICIAL MAIL ALLOWANCE.

    (a) In General.--Section 311(e)(2)(B)(i) of the Legislative Branch 
Appropriations Act, 1991 (2 U.S.C. 59e(e)(2)(B)(i)) is amended by 
striking ``3'' and inserting ``1.5''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
with respect to sessions of Congress beginning with the second session 
of the One Hundred Third Congress.

SEC. 2. TRANSFER OF CERTAIN FUNDS PROHIBITED.

    Section 101(c)(2) of the Legislative Branch Appropriations Act, 
1993 (2 U.S.C. 95b(c)(2)), is amended by striking `` ``official mail 
costs'',''.

                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.2














CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the annual report of United American Healthcare Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the  fiscal year ended June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert T. Sullivan, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


2.
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





Dated: October 13, 2011








By:/s/ Robert T. Sullivan


Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer


(principal financial officer and accounting officer)
Original,

No. 4712.

#### Salem Cooperative Bank *v.*John L. Southwick, Jr., *& a.*

Argued February 3, 1959.

Decided February 20, 1959.

*2*Green, Green, Bomprey & Sullivan (Mr. Samuel Green*orally), for the plaintiff.

*John L. Southwick, Jr.*(by brief and orally), *pro se*and for Grace Southwick.

Per curiam.

It is established law that where an adequate remedy is available upon appeal, certiorari will not be granted. *Waisman*v. *Manchester,*96 N. H. 50, 52; *Nashua*v. *Public Utilities Commission,*101 N. H. 503. If the defendants have been aggrieved by the rulings of the Trial Court adequate review can be obtained by a bill of exceptions. RSA 490:10; *Bagley*v. *Small,*92 N. H. 107, 108.

*Petition dismissed.*
# EUR-Lex - 11957A136 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11957A136

**TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN ATOMIC ENERGY COMMUNITY ( E.A.E.C. - EURATOM ), TITLE THREE - PROVISIONS GOVERNING THE INSTITUTIONS, CHAPTER I: THE INSTITUTIONS OF THE COMMUNITY, SECTION IV: THE COURT OF JUSTICE, ARTICLE 136 **

*

*

++++

ARTICLE 136

THE COURT OF JUSTICE SHALL ENSURE THAT IN THE INTERPRETATION AND APPLICATION OF THIS TREATY THE LAW IS OBSERVED .