alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Home
About
2020 Federal View Point Survey Results
	About DTIC
	Administrator
	Announcements
	Contact Us
	DTIC’s Past and Future
	DTIC Strategic Plan
	Employment
	Sitemap
Products & Services
DTIC’s Products & Services
	DTIC Registration Benefits
	DTIC Combatant Command (CCMD) Classified Reading Room
	Training
Submit Documents
Sign In
Operating Status
 Defense Technical Information Center
				*Search this site, DoD S&T Reports, and more..*

**Internet Explorer Users:** It is recommended that you use the Google Chrome or Microsoft Edge browser for an optimal experience with this application as Microsoft’s support for Internet Explorer is ending.
	DISMISS Request from the Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP)
		December 4, 2019Request from OSTP
		
			
	
	From the Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP):
Request issued for information on the American research environment
Back to DTIC Notifications
 Recent Posts
		DTIC Journal Article Is Published
											April 16, 2021
											DTIC publishes special edition of peer-reviewed scientific journal JDR&E
											November 12, 2020
											CUI marking framework guidance now available.
											November 10, 2020
											EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY: New submission requirements for DoD-funded journal articles
											September 24, 2020
											House Appropriations Committee Report on the Defense Appropriations Act for FY2021
											July 21, 2020 Archives
			April 2021
	November 2020
	September 2020
	July 2020
	February 2020
	January 2020
	December 2019
	September 2019
	August 2019
	June 2019
	April 2019
	March 2019
	February 2019
	January 2019
	September 2018
	August 2018
	July 2018
	January 2018
	February 2017
 **DEFENSE TECHNICAL INFORMATION CENTER**
8725 John J. Kingman Road
Fort Belvoir, Virginia 22060-6218
(800) 225-3842https://Discover.DTIC.mil
			AdministratorContact UsDoD Privacy ProgramEEOEmploymentFOIAInformation Analysis Centers
			Information QualityLegalMission StatementNo FEAR ActOpen GovernmentPlain Language
			Policy MemorandaPrivacy PolicySAPRStrategic PlanSubmit DocumentsUSA.govUSD(R&E)
			LinkedIn

NOTICE:  The appearance of hyperlinks does not constitute endorsement by the DTIC of non-U.S. Government sites or the information, products, or services contained therein.  Although the DTIC may or may not use these sites as additional distribution channels for Department of Defense information, it does not exercise editorial control over all of the information that you may find at these locations.  Such hyperlinks are provided consistent with the stated purpose of this website. The DTIC bears no responsibility for the accuracy, legality or content of the external website or for that of subsequent links. Contact the external website for answers to questions regarding its content. Please let us know about existing external links which you believe are inappropriate.
# EUR-Lex - 12004V297 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V297

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART III — THE POLICIES AND FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - TITLE V — THE UNION'S EXTERNAL ACTION - CHAPTER II — COMMON FOREIGN AND SECURITY POLICY - Section 1 — Common provisions - Article III-297 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0134 - 0135 *

Article III-297

1. Where the international situation requires operational action by the Union, the Council shall adopt the necessary European decisions. Such decisions shall lay down the objectives, the scope, the means to be made available to the Union, if necessary the duration, and the conditions for implementation of the action.

If there is a change in circumstances having a substantial effect on a question subject to such a European decision, the Council shall review the principles and objectives of that decision and adopt the necessary European decisions.

2. The European decisions referred to in paragraph 1 shall commit the Member States in the positions they adopt and in the conduct of their activity.

3. Whenever there is any plan to adopt a national position or take national action pursuant to a European decision as referred to in paragraph 1, information shall be provided by the Member State concerned in time to allow, if necessary, for prior consultations within the Council. The obligation to provide prior information shall not apply to measures which are merely a national transposition of such a decision.

4. In cases of imperative need arising from changes in the situation and failing a review of the European decision pursuant to the second subparagraph of paragraph 1, Member States may take the necessary measures as a matter of urgency, having regard to the general objectives of that decision. The Member State concerned shall inform the Council immediately of any such measures.

5. Should there be any major difficulties in implementing a European decision as referred to in this Article, a Member State shall refer them to the Council which shall discuss them and seek appropriate solutions. Such solutions shall not run counter to the objectives of the action or impair its effectiveness.

--------------------------------------------------
§ 80.137 What if real property is no longer useful or needed for its original purpose? If the director of the State fish and wildlife agency and the Regional Director jointly decide that real property acquired with grant funds is no longer useful or needed for its original purpose under the grant, the director of the agency must: ( a ) Propose another eligible purpose for the real property under the grant program and ask the Regional Director to approve this proposed purpose; or
( b ) Follow the regulations at 2 CFR 200.311 and consult with the Regional Director on how to treat proceeds from the disposition of real property.
[84 FR 44788, Aug. 27, 2019]
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.3

               [LETTERHEAD OF MILLER AND LENTS, LTD. APPEARS HERE]

                                 March 28, 2003

XTO Energy Inc.
810 Houston Street
Fort Worth, TX 76102

                                             Re: XTO Energy Inc.
                                                 2002 Annual Report on Form 10-K

Gentlemen:

     The firm of Miller and Lents, Ltd., consents to the use of its name and to
the use of its report dated March 6, 2003, regarding the XTO Energy Inc. Proved
Reserves and Future Net Revenues as of December 31, 2002, in the 2002 Annual
Report on Form 10-K.

     Miller and Lents, Ltd., has no interests in XTO Energy Inc. or in any
affiliated companies or subsidiaries and is not to receive any such interest as
payment for such reports and has no director, officer, or employee otherwise
connected with XTO Energy Inc. We are not employed by XTO Energy Inc. on a
contingent basis.

                                 Yours very truly,

                                 MILLER AND LENTS, LTD.


                                 By /s/ R.W. Frazier
                                    -------------------------
                                    R.W. Frazier
                                    President
# EUR-Lex - 12004V400 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V400

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART III — THE POLICIES AND FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - TITLE VI — THE FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - CHAPTER I — PROVISIONS GOVERNING THE INSTITUTIONS - Section 4 — Provisions common to Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies - Article III-400 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0172 - 0173 *

Article III-400

1. The Council shall adopt European regulations and decisions determining:

(a) the salaries, allowances and pensions of the President of the European Council, the President of the Commission, the Union Minister for Foreign Affairs, the members of the Commission, the Presidents, members and Registrars of the Court of Justice of the European Union, and the Secretary-General of the Council;

(b) the conditions of employment, in particular the salaries, allowances and pensions, of the President and members of the Court of Auditors;

(c) any payment to be made instead of remuneration to the persons referred to in points (a) and (b).

2. The Council shall adopt European regulations and decisions determining the allowances of the members of the Economic and Social Committee.

--------------------------------------------------
§ 80.95 How does an agency receive Federal grant funds? ( a ) A State fish and wildlife agency may receive Federal grant funds through either: ( 1 ) A request for reimbursement; or
( 2 ) A request for an advance of funds if the agency maintains or demonstrates that it will maintain procedures to minimize time between transfer of funds and disbursement by the agency or its subgrantee.
( b ) An agency must use the following procedures to receive a reimbursement or an advance of funds: ( 1 ) Request funds through an electronic payment system designated by the Regional Director; or
( 2 ) Request funds on a standard form for that purpose only if the agency is unable to use the electronic payment system.
( c ) The Regional Director will reimburse or advance funds only to the office or official designated by the agency and authorized by State law to receive public funds for the State.
( d ) All payments are subject to final determination of allowability based on audit or a Service review. The State fish and wildlife agency must repay any overpayment as directed by the Regional Director.
( e ) The Regional Director may withhold payments pending receipt of all required reports or documentation for the project.
United States Court of Appeals 

For the Seventh Circuit 

Chicago, Illinois 60604 

August 21, 2019 

Before 

JOEL M. FLAUM, Circuit Judge 

DANIEL A. MANION, Circuit Judge 

AMY C. BARRETT, Circuit Judge 

No. 18-3392 

EMMIS COMMUNICATIONS 

CORPORATION, 

 Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v. 

ILLINOIS NATIONAL INSURANCE 

COMPANY, 

 Defendant-Appellant.

 Appeal from the United States 

District Court for the Southern District 

of Indiana, Indianapolis Division. 

No. 1:16-cv-0089-WTL-DML 

William T. Lawrence, 

Judge. 

O R D E R 

After considering the plaintiff’s petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en 

banc filed on July 16, 2019, the panel GRANTS the petition for panel rehearing, 

VACATES the judgment, and WITHDRAWS the opinion it issued on July 2, 2019. The 

judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED for the reasons stated in the district court’s 

opinion of March 21, 2018, which is attached. 

In light of the panel’s disposition of the petition for panel rehearing, the 

plaintiff’s petition for rehearing en banc is DISMISSED as moot.
###### Editorial Note on Part 648

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 648 appear at 62 FR 14651, Mar. 27, 1997.

#### § 648.61 [Reserved]
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-13-00798-CR

Eric C. MARS,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012CR9994

Honorable Sid L. Harle, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE STONE, JUSTICE MARION, AND JUSTICE BARNARD

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is 

AFFIRMED.

SIGNED July 9, 2014.

_____________________________

Catherine Stone, Chief Justice
EXHIBIT 12.1

XTO ENERGY INC.

Computation Of Ratio Of Earnings To Fixed Charges



|                                                     |  |                        |       |      |   |       |  |      |       |      |   |       |  |   |    
|---------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------- | ----- | ---- | - | ----- |  | ---- | ----- | ---- | - | ----- |  | - | ---
|                                                     |  | YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31
|(in millions, except ratios)                         |  | 2008                   |       | 2007 |   | 2006  |  | 2005 |       | 2004
|Income before income tax                             |  | $                      | 3,026 |      | $ | 2,642 |  | $    | 2,961 |      | $ | 1,810 |  | $ | 826
|Interest expense                                     |  |                        | 494   |      |   | 267   |  |      | 182   |      |   | 154   |  |   | 94 
|Interest portion of rentals                          |  |                        | 5     |      |   | 5     |  |      | 7     |      |   | 8     |  |   | 7  
|Earnings before provision fortaxes and fixed charges |  | $                      | 3,525 |      | $ | 2,914 |  | $    | 3,150 |      | $ | 1,972 |  | $ | 927
|Interest expense                                     |  | $                      | 494   |      | $ | 267   |  | $    | 182   |      | $ | 154   |  | $ | 94 
|Capitalized interest                                 |  |                        | 39    |      |   | 30    |  |      | 18    |      |   | 6     |  |   | 3  
|Interest portion of rentals                          |  |                        | 5     |      |   | 5     |  |      | 7     |      |   | 8     |  |   | 7  
|Total Fixed Charges                                  |  | $                      | 538   |      | $ | 302   |  | $    | 207   |      | $ | 168   |  | $ | 104
|                                                     |  |                        |       |      |  
|Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges                   |  |                        | 6.6   |      |   | 9.6   |  |      | 15.2  |      |   | 11.7  |  |   | 8.9
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 179 (Friday, September 15, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 54511]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-7671]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Center for 
Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel, September 20, 2006, 1 p.m. to 
September 20, 2006, 3 p.m., National Institutes of Health, 6701 
Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 which was published in the Federal 
Register on August 28, 2006, 71 FR 50932.
    The meeting will be held September 19, 2006, 2 p.m. to 4:30 p.m. 
The meeting location remains the same. The meeting is closed to the 
public.

    Dated: September 7, 2006.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 06-7671 Filed 9-14-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
[No. 1830.]

#### Fernando Ramirez v. The State.

Theft—Charge of the Court.— Circumstantial Evidence being alone relied upon to establish the fraudulent taking of the alleged stolen animal, the trial court, by failing to give in charge the law governing such evidence, committed fundamental error.

*134[Opinion delivered January 9, 1886.]

Appeal from the District Court of Lee. Tried below before the Hon. I. B. McFarland.

The conviction in this case was for the theft of a horse, the property of Charles Wilson, in Lee county, Texas, on the 1st day of December, 1884. A term of five years in the penitentiary was the-penalty assessed against the appellant.

Ho brief for the appellant.

*J. H. Burts,*Assistant Attorney-General, for the State.

White, Presiding Judge.

So far as the fraudulent taking of the animal is concerned, the evidence is wholly circumstantial. Ho charge or instruction was given the jury by the court upon the law applicable to such a state of facts. It is therefore, as has been repeatedly decided, fundamentally deficient. (See authorities collated in *Wright v. The State,*18 Texas Ct. App., 358.)

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

*Reversed and remanded.*
# Gold Star Mother's Day, 2006

Since America's founding, every generation has produced patriots willing to sacrifice for our great Nation. Many of these proud sons and daughters have given everything for our freedom, and America has mourned the loss of every life. On Gold Star Mother's Day, we pay special tribute to the mothers of those lost while defending our country and extending the blessings of liberty to others.

Gold Star Mothers have long borne the hardships of war with dignity and devotion. Through heartbreaking loss and unimaginable grief, they continue to support each other through difficult times, stand up for those wearing the uniform of the United States, and serve their communities in the best traditions of the American spirit. Their strength, compassion, and determination are an inspiration to all and a source of great pride for our Nation.

America lives in freedom because of the sacrifices of America's finest citizens and of the mothers who raised them. In the words of President Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1944, “There is nothing adequate which anyone in any place can say to those who are entitled to display the gold star in their windows.” Each year, this observance is an opportunity to offer our solemn respect to Gold Star Mothers and renew our ongoing pledge that America will always remember those who died while wearing the uniform of the United States and forever honor their families' sacrifice.

The Congress, by Senate Joint Resolution 115 of June 23, 1936 (49 Stat. 1895 as amended), has designated the last Sunday in September as “Gold Star Mother's Day” and has authorized and requested the President to issue a proclamation in its observance. On this day, we express our deep gratitude to our Nation's Gold Star Mothers, and we ask God's blessings on them and on their families.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, do hereby proclaim Sunday, September 24, 2006, as Gold Star Mother's Day. I call upon all Government officials to display the flag of the United States over Government buildings on this solemn day. I also encourage the American people to display the flag and hold appropriate ceremonies as a public expression of our Nation's sympathy and respect for our Gold Star Mothers.

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twentieth day of September, in the year of our Lord two thousand six, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-first. 

[FR Doc. 06-8286

Billing code 3195-01-P
# EUR-Lex - 12004V358 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V358

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART III — THE POLICIES AND FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - TITLE VI — THE FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - CHAPTER I — PROVISIONS GOVERNING THE INSTITUTIONS - Section 1 — The institutions - Subsection 5 — The Court of Justice of the European Union - Article III-358 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0157 - 0158 *

Article III-358

1. The General Court shall have jurisdiction to hear and determine at first instance actions or proceedings referred to in Articles III-365, III-367, III-370, III-372 and III-374, with the exception of those assigned to a specialised court set up under Article III-359 and those reserved in the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union for the Court of Justice. The Statute may provide for the General Court to have jurisdiction for other classes of action or proceeding.

Decisions given by the General Court under this paragraph may be subject to a right of appeal to the Court of Justice on points of law only, under the conditions and within the limits laid down by the Statute.

2. The General Court shall have jurisdiction to hear and determine actions or proceedings brought against decisions of the specialised courts.

Decisions given by the General Court under this paragraph may exceptionally be subject to review by the Court of Justice, under the conditions and within the limits laid down by the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union, where there is a serious risk of the unity or consistency of Union law being affected.

3. The General Court shall have jurisdiction to hear and determine questions referred for a preliminary ruling under Article III-369, in specific areas laid down by the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union.

Where the General Court considers that the case requires a decision of principle likely to affect the unity or consistency of Union law, it may refer the case to the Court of Justice for a ruling.

Decisions given by the General Court on questions referred for a preliminary ruling may exceptionally be subject to review by the Court of Justice, under the conditions and within the limits laid down by the Statute, where there is a serious risk of the unity or consistency of Union law being affected.

--------------------------------------------------
Editorial Note on Part 648
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 648 appear at 62 FR 14651, Mar. 27, 1997.

§ 648.101 Summer flounder Annual Catch Target (ACT). ( a ) *Annual catch target.* The Monitoring Committee shall identify and review the relevant sources of management uncertainty to recommend ACTs for the commercial and recreational fishing sectors as part of the summer flounder specification process. The Monitoring Committee recommendations shall identify the specific sources of management uncertainty that were considered, technical approaches to mitigating these sources of uncertainty, and any additional relevant information considered in the ACT recommendation process. ( 1 ) *Sectors.* Commercial and recreational specific ACTs shall be less than or equal to the sector-specific ACLs. The Monitoring Committee shall recommend any reduction in catch necessary to address sector-specific management uncertainty, consistent with this paragraph (a).
( 2 ) *Periodicity.* ACTs may be established on an annual basis for up to 3 years at a time, dependent on whether the SSC provides single or multiple year ABC recommendations.
( b ) *Performance review.* The Monitoring Committee shall conduct a detailed review of fishery performance relative to ACTs in conjunction with any ACL performance review, as outlined in § 648.100(b)(1) through (3).
[76 FR 60626, Sept. 29, 2011, as amended at 88 FR 14507, Mar. 9, 2023]
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5242 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5242

 To amend the Act commonly referred to as the ``Johnson Act'' to limit 
    the authority of States to regulate gambling devices on vessels.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 7, 1994

  Ms. Schenk introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
               Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Act commonly referred to as the ``Johnson Act'' to limit 
    the authority of States to regulate gambling devices on vessels.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AUTHORITY OF STATES TO REGULATE GAMBLING 
              DEVICES ON VESSELS.

    Section 5(b)(2) of the Act of January 2, 1951 (15 U.S.C. 
1175(b)(2)), commonly referred to as the ``Johnson Act'', is amended by 
adding at the end the following:
                    ``(C) Exclusion of certain voyages and segments.--
                Except for a voyage or segment of a voyage that occurs 
                within the boundaries of the State of Hawaii, a voyage 
                or segment of a voyage is not described in subparagraph 
                (B) if it includes or consists of a segment--
                            ``(i) that begins and ends in the same 
                        State;
                            ``(ii) that is part of a voyage to another 
                        State or to a foreign country; and
                            ``(iii) in which the vessel reaches the 
                        other State or foreign country within 3 days 
                        after leaving the State in which it begins.''.
                                 <all>
```