.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Living on a Restless Planet

Solid Earth Science

Working Group

Report
.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

hat is the nature of deformation at plate boundaries and

what are the implications for earthquake hazards?

ow do tectonics and climate interact to shape

the Earth’s surface and create natural hazards?

hat are the interactions among ice masses, oceans, and the

Solid Earth and their implications for sea-level change?

ow do magmatic systems evolve and under what conditions

do volcanoes erupt?

hat are the dynamics of the mantle

 and crust and how does the Earth’s

surface respond?

W

W

H

H

W What are the dynamics of the Earth’s

magnetic field and its interactions

with the Earth system?
Living on a Restless Planet

Solid Earth Science

Working Group

Report

2002

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Web site: http://solidearth.jpl.nasa.gov
.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

To the Reader,

The surface of the Earth is where we live. Yet our planet is a restless home, subject to earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, destructive floods, landslides, and other

natural hazards. The Earth’s surface is always changing, in response to processes

deep in the planet’s interior as well as to a complex suite of interactions among

the solid Earth, atmosphere, oceans, hydrosphere, and biosphere. Understanding these changes poses a deep scientific challenge, but meeting that challenge

can reap enormous practical benefit.

NASA has an opportunity to make key observations that can revolutionize our

ability to characterize, monitor, and forecast changes in our planet’s surface. In

recognition of that opportunity, Dr. Ghassem Asrar, the NASA Associate Administrator for the Office of Earth Science, appointed a Solid Earth Science Working

Group (SESWG) in the summer of 2000. The SESWG was charged “to guide the

science community in the development of a recommended long-term vision and

strategy for solid-Earth science at NASA.”

In the course of our deliberations, the working group sought the advice of experts both within NASA and from other organizations. We briefed our scientific

colleagues at two national scientific meetings, and we maintained reports of

our progress on an open Web site to invite comments and suggestions from the

broad scientific community.

This report is the working group’s response to our charge. We hope you agree

that this “long-term vision and strategy for solid-Earth science at NASA” not

only is scientifically compelling but offers the potential to improve humankind’s

ability to thrive on our restless planet.

Sincerely,

Sean C. Solomon

SESWG Chair

2002

Cover:

Topography of the Earth with the oceans

drained reveals spreading ocean ridges

(East Pacific Rise), subduction zones

(Middle America Trench), and the

transform fault boundary

(San Andreas fault) between the Pacific

and North American plates.

Inset, top to bottom: A landslide that has

destroyed a residential home; a massive

section collapsed from the four-lane I-5

freeway — Northridge earthquake, 1994;

catastrophic eruption of Mount

St. Helens in 1980.

Title page, top to bottom: Aerial view of

the San Andreas fault slicing

through the Carrizo Plain in the

Temblor Range east of the city of San

Luis Obispo, California.

In Ice Fields Parkway, Alberta, Canada,

glacial crevasses (deep cracks in the ice)

open from the downslope movement

of the glacier; as glaciers move, they

quarry and pluck away at the lead surface on valley floors and along the sides.

The confluence of the Mississippi, Missouri, and Illinois rivers are shown in this

view of the St. Louis area from the

Shuttle Radar Topography Mission. The

rivers themselves appear black. The

floodplains, colored green, are at

particular risk during times of flooding.

Color coding is directly related to topographic height, with blue and green at

the lower elevations, rising through

yellow and brown to white at the

highest elevations.
.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Contents

Fragile Foundations 2

Global Perspectives 6

Scientific Imperatives 10

Essential Partnerships 13

What Is the Nature of Deformation at Plate Boundaries and

What Are the Implications for Earthquake Hazards? 16

How Do Tectonics and Climate Interact to Shape the Earth’s

Surface and Create Natural Hazards? 18

What Are the Interactions among Ice Masses, Oceans, and the

Solid Earth and Their Implications for Sea-Level Change? 20

How Do Magmatic Systems Evolve and Under What Conditions

Do Volcanoes Erupt? 22

What Are the Dynamics of the Mantle and Crust and How Does

the Earth’s Surface Respond? 24

What Are the Dynamics of the Earth’s Magnetic Field and Its

Interactions with the Earth System? 26

Recommendations for an Integrated Program for Solid-Earth

Science 28

Summary 57

Credits 62

Solid Earth Science Working Group (SESWG) 63
.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

O

Fragile Foundations

2

 ver the past several decades, Earth science as a discipline has begun to recognize

 the dynamic, interconnected nature of the Earth as a system. Each component —

oceans, atmosphere, biosphere, and solid Earth — interacts in fundamentally complex

ways. Forcings from each component continually drive responses in the other components.

Despite the familiar stability implied in “being on solid ground,” the solid Earth is actually a

dynamic component of the Earth system. From core motions at the center, through mantle

convection, plate tectonics, volcanic eruptions, and land surface evolution, the solid Earth is

always changing. Measurements collected in the last decade have shown that it is now

possible to study these fluctuations accurately and systematically from space across a wide

range of time scales. Space-based technologies are revolutionizing our understanding of

the solid Earth, as previously unrecognized subtle changes are revealed on regional to global scales.

Investigating the behavior of the solid Earth yields direct societal benefits. Combining

space-based and terrestrial measurements has the potential to reduce significantly the

losses due to inevitable natural disasters. NASA-sponsored activities will contribute substantially to our understanding of the processes leading to earthquakes, volcanic eruptions,

sea-level rise, floods, landslides, and other hazards. NASA observations and analyses, integrated into ongoing hazards programs in federal, state, and international agencies, will reduce the loss of life and property through improved planning, improved response, and

more efficient post-event recovery. In addition, by understanding the underlying forces, we

can determine to what extent such natural hazards are predictable. Combining state-of-theart measurements with advanced modeling techniques will lead to increasingly refined predictive capabilities for the entire Earth science community.

Collapsed apartment building in

Van Nuys, California, after the

1994 Northridge earthquake,

the costliest in U.S. history. The

magnitude 6.7 quake raised

nearby Oat Mountain, which

overlooks the San Fernando Valley, by more than 30 cm. More

than 3,000 homes were destroyed or damaged, and 57

people were killed. Estimates of

damage exceed $20 billion.
.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

. 3

The 1995 Kobe, Japan, earthquake was a comparatively

modest 6.9 magnitude event

that nonetheless caused 5,480

deaths, over $150 billion in

damage, and a major disruption of Japan’s economy with

global impacts.

Understanding the Solid Earth and Mitigating Natural Hazards

A primary goal of solid-Earth science is the assessment and mitigation of natural hazards

that seriously threaten health, safety, national security, and economic viability. Space-based

data acquired by NASA and other cooperating federal agencies contribute heavily to our

forecasting and understanding of these hazards. The 25-year vision of the Solid Earth Science Working Group (SESWG) is to understand natural and perturbed systems sufficiently

well to predict outcomes, consequences, and impacts.

• Earthquakes — Earthquake hazards pose a serious risk to the health, safety, and economic viability of many parts of the United States and throughout the world. Recent urban

earthquakes, such as Northridge, California; Kobe, Japan; and Izmit, Turkey, demonstrate

the risks to modern industrial societies from consequent loss of life, infrastructure damage,

and financial instability. Vulnerable populations and infrastructure in low-lying coastal regions are often subjected to amplified shaking, liquefaction, and tsunamis generated by

submarine earthquakes and underwater landslides. Major earthquakes can be expected to

occur adjacent to or within many metropolitan regions in the United States. How can we

apply knowledge of surface deformation to aid in mitigation planning by highlighting regions of likely future earthquakes?
.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

In 1991, Mount Pinatubo in

the Philippines erupted with

tremendous force, ejecting

large amounts of ash and gas

into the stratosphere. Strong

winds spread the aerosol particles around the globe. The

result was a measurable cooling of the Earth’s surface for a

period of almost two years.

Shore erosion at Fire Island,

New York, illustrates the

combined effects of

sea-level rise and severe

storms on U.S. Atlantic

coastal communities.

4

• Volcanic Eruptions —

Explosive volcanic eruptions

pose both short-term and

long-term hazards. Volcanic

ash clouds can disrupt aircraft travel. Ash from a 1989

eruption in Alaska temporarily disabled all four jet engines on a commercial aircraft that barely managed to

return to Anchorage to land. On longer time scales, these eruptions can inject massive

quantities of ash into the atmosphere, greatly reducing the solar heating of the Earth

and potentially interrupting the global food supply for several years. Potential sources

of massive eruptions in the Western United States include Long Valley caldera, Yellowstone, and the chains of volcanoes in the Cascade Mountains and in Alaska. What measurements can be made that will enable forecasting of eruptions?

• Floods — Flood hazards pose a major economic threat in many parts of the United

States and the world. For example, the Yangtze River, China, flood in 1998 claimed 3,656

lives, displaced over 30 million people, and cost China $38 billion. In the United States,

the Mississippi River floods of 1993 displaced over 70,000 people, killed 52 individuals,

and rendered temporarily useless over 30,000 square kilometers of productive farmland.

Damage was estimated to cost $15–20 billion. Can flood height determinations and

floodwave modeling be used to

predict inundation depths in

near real-time and reduce damage from flooding?

• Sea-Level Change — Longterm variations in sea level relative to the solid Earth threaten

major coastal cities worldwide.

Along the eastern seaboard and

Gulf Coast of the United States,

sea-level rise combined with severe weather cause significant

coastal inundation and erosion.
.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

. 5

After excessive rainfall in the

spring of 1995, the hillside

above La Conchita, California,

gave way; 600,000 tons of mud

and silt partially buried the

neighborhood.

How do ongoing changes in global climate, ice masses, and land

hydrology contribute to the rate

of sea-level rise?

• Landslides — Throughout the

western United States and indeed

the world, wherever steep topography and urbanization meet (or

are juxtaposed), landslides and

debris flows pose a threat. Landslides cause nearly $1.5 billion in

damage in the U.S. each year. Can

we provide real-time landslide

likelihood by understanding geologic, climatic, and human controls on land surface change?

• Forest and Wild Fires — Wild

fires destroy natural resources

and habitations, accelerate erosion, and promote flooding. How

can remote sensing of vegetation, soil

moisture, topography, and climatic conditions serve to predict fire hazards

and assist in planning fire-resistant

communities?

The program described in this 25-year

vision for solid-Earth science at NASA

will vastly improve our nation’s ability

to respond to and prepare for natural

disasters. Space-based observations provide a unique capability to sample in detail catastrophic events that while locally rare are more common on a global scale and often occur

in remote localities. Through partnerships with mission-oriented agencies, NASA data and

models can be integrated with land-based observations to document fully the effects of

each natural disaster both during and after an event. Through collaborative efforts, NASA

can assist in defining, ahead of time, those regions most vulnerable to the disastrous effects of natural hazards.

Wildland fires occur globally,

the result of both natural and

human causes, and are often a

direct threat to human lives and

property. Space-based monitoring and studies of post-burn

areas are crucial to understanding and mitigating the negative

effects of uncontrolled fires.
.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Variations in the Earth’s

length-of-day (LOD) are

caused by many geophysical

and climatic processes that

transport large quantities of

mass in the atmosphere,

oceans, land, hydrosphere,

solid mantle, and fluid core.

Historical and precise modern

data tell a fascinating story as

shown in this sequence of

“zoom-in” charts: The top

panel demonstrates that the

largest LOD variation is a result of material motions in the

core; the middle panel zooms

in on the interannual LOD

variation caused by El Niño/

Southern Oscillation in the

tropical atmosphere–ocean

system; the bottom panel

zooms in yet further into subdaily LOD variations, for which

the ocean tidal motion is

shown to be the cause.

Global Perspectives

6

Increasingly we recognize that our knowledge of the Earth will be incomplete until we can

characterize, understand, and predict the interactions among the different components of

the Earth system. The global nature of solid-Earth science requires a wide variety of observational strategies. Particularly critical is the comprehensive, synoptic perspective that is

achievable only from space, a perspective that NASA is uniquely qualified to provide.

1820 1840 1860 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000

Time (year)

1982 2000 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996

Time (year)

1998

310 312 314 316 318 320

Time (day in 1996)

Excess Length-of-Day (LOD): Observed vs. Modeled Core Angular Momentum

Excess Length-of-Day (LOD): Observed vs. El Niño/Southern Oscillation (ENSO)

Universal Time (UT1): Observed vs. Ocean Tidal Angular Momentum

4

2

0

–2

LOD (milliseconds)

1980

0.5

0

–0.5

LOD (milliseconds)

60

20

–20

–60

UT1 (microseconds)

La Niña

El Niño El Niño
.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

. 7

The internal dynamics of the Earth are largely driven by the loss of heat from the deep interior.

This heat engine drives the generation of the Earth’s magnetic field in the fluid outer core. It is

also responsible for convective flow in the mantle, which in turn drives the motions of the tectonic plates at the surface that result in mountain building, earthquakes, and volcanism. To understand the generation of the Earth’s magnetic field, we must also understand the circulation in

the outer core; and to understand convective flow in the mantle we must understand the flow of

heat from the core to the mantle.

But the interactions extend beyond the Earth’s interior. The Earth’s magnetic field protects the atmosphere from space radiation and the solar wind. The interactions of high-energy particles with

the atmosphere, mediated by the magnetic field, may play a role in climate change. Variations in

the rotation rate of the Earth are coupled to changes not only in the circulation of the atmosphere and oceans but also to the circulation in the outer core and the rotation of the inner core.

Large volcanic eruptions inject gasses and particulate matter high into the atmosphere, influencing climate for years.

Humankind’s interactions with the Earth system are an increasingly important global component.

Activities such as deforestation and excessive agricultural use wreak havoc on the natural processes shaping our landscape. In many cases these activities greatly disrupt the hydrological cycle

and expose new areas to the risk of catastrophic fires, massive erosion, or flooding. Quantitatively predicting these impacts to the Earth system will require a fundamental understanding of

the energy and mass fluxes in the natural processes shaping the landscape.

Role of Space Observations

Spaceborne data are uniquely suited to providing the synoptic perspective necessary to tie together sets of ground-based measurements on local spatial scales and variable temporal resolution to yield a truly global perspective on Earth processes. Space observations are therefore fully

complementary to the often more intensive, local surface measurements that constitute the traditional core of solid-Earth studies. Understanding discrete events on and within the Earth, and

from them building a complete picture of our planet’s dynamics, requires views of the governing

behavior at local, regional, and global scales. For many scientific issues — such as understanding

the time-varying internal magnetic field, the deformation around great fault zones, or changing

land-use patterns — satellite-based observations are the primary practical means to obtain an

adequate density of coverage. Integrating these observations into comprehensive predictive

models requires a new generation of satellite measurements at temporal and spatial resolutions

substantially superior to those made in the past. Some examples illustrate the compelling

opportunities:

Interactions in the Earth System
.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

• Space-based geodetic observations provide detailed information on the surface deformation adjacent to plate boundaries, both on land and on the seafloor. These observations are

essential for understanding deformation of the tectonic plates and the fluid behavior of

the mantle below.

NASA’s development of space-based geodetic techniques has revolutionized the science of

geodesy. Today geodesy, along with seismology, provides primary data for understanding

crustal and mantle dynamics and for evaluating and forecasting earthquakes and volcanic

eruptions. Geodetic data include measurements made via satellite laser ranging (SLR),

which provides a terrestrial reference frame essential for geophysical and astronomical observations. Very-long-baseline interferometry (VLBI) constrains an absolute reference for

the Earth, which quantifies the Earth’s rotation. The Global Positioning System (GPS), a constellation of 24 satellites used for navigation and precise geodetic position measurements,

provides the position of any point on the Earth’s surface with millimeter accuracy. GPS measurements can be made inexpensively, continuously in time, and with relatively dense land

networks. Interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR) measures spatially continuous

deformation with sub-centimeter accuracy.

• Topographic data provide a record of past interactions among tectonic, hydrologic, oceanic, ice, and atmospheric processes. In modeling these processes, topographic data constitute the basis for predicting where and how hazardous events will impact the landscape

and its human occupants. Radar and laser altimetry yield high-resolution topography and

its temporal changes for ocean, land, and ice surfaces.

• Space-based measurements of rainfall, river heights, soil moisture, and vegetation change

provide critical indices of the most commonly occurring hazards, floods and landslides.

• Space magnetic measurements are essential for mapping and understanding not only the

main part of the Earth’s magnetic field generated in the Earth’s liquid outer core, but also

the crustal field, the external field, and currents induced in the mantle by the external field.

The combination of satellite-based measurements with numerical modeling promises to

lead to a new level of understanding of the generation of Earth’s magnetic field.

• Gravity maps provide critical constraints on the Earth’s internal density distribution that is

responsible for mantle flow. Time-dependent gravity changes monitor interior flow and

near-surface deformation during the earthquake cycle, changes in the mass of ice sheets,

and changes in the volume of water held in our aquifer systems.

8
.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

. 9

Horizontal velocities,

primarily reflecting

motions of the Earth’s

tectonic plates, are derived

from daily position estimates determined from

satellite signals

recorded by receivers on

the ground.

Opportunities in Solid-Earth Science

The beginning of the 21st century is a time of unprecedented opportunity in solid-Earth

science. The confluence of advances in satellite-based observing systems, high-performance computing and communications, and recent fundamental discoveries, all over

the past few decades, promises an era in which many of the previously seemingly intractable problems in solid-Earth science are now ready to be solved. In the next two decades

we will reach a new understanding of earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, wildfires, landslides, floods, and the dynamics of the Earth’s core and mantle. NASA has unique approaches to contribute to seizing this scientific opportunity, as outlined in greater detail in

this report.

80°

40°

0°

–40°

–80°

80°

40°

0°

–40°

–80°

0° 40° 80° 120° 160° 200° 240° 280° 320°

0° 40° 80° 120° 160° 200° 240° 280° 320°
.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

S

10

Scientific Imperatives

Scientific goals

and challenges

for the Solid

Earth Science

Program.

4. How do magmatic systems

evolve and under what conditions

do volcanoes erupt?

5. What are the dynamics of the

mantle and crust and how does

the Earth’s surface respond?

6. What are the dynamics of the

Earth’s magnetic field and its

interactions with the Earth

system?

Observe, understand, and model the Earth system to learn how it is

changing and the consequences for life on Earth.

• How is the Earth’s surface being

transformed and how can such

information be used to predict

future changes?

• What are the motions of the

Earth and the Earth’s interior,

and what information can be

inferred about Earth’s internal

processes?

1. What is the nature of deformation

at plate boundaries and what are the

implications for earthquake hazards?

2. How do tectonics and climate

interact to shape the Earth’s surface

and create natural hazards?

3. What are the interactions among

ice masses, oceans, and the solid

Earth and their implications for sealevel change?

 ix broad scientific challenges have been identified as highest in priority for NASA’s

 Solid Earth Science Program for the next 25 years. These challenges have been

chosen on the basis of four criteria:

• They are of fundamental scientific importance.

• They have strong implications for society.

• They are amenable to substantial progress through new observations.

• There are unique contributions that NASA can make to those observations.

The six challenges (highlighted in the blue table below) also build naturally on directions

identified in the NASA Earth Science Enterprise (ESE) Strategic Plan (see the green table below), which was developed through a strong interaction with the broad Earth science community. The six challenges are guiding themes that should define the research objectives

for solid-Earth science within NASA for the next two and a half decades.

Systematic observations of seafloor bathymetry, gravity, and the Earth’s magnetic field in

the 1940s–1960s provided the critical evidence that led to the development of the theory

of plate tectonics, the greatest revolution in Earth science history. Over the past 30 years,

ESE Goal and Leading Solid Earth Science Questions

Scientific Challenges for NASA’s Solid Earth Science Program
11

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

many details of plate

tectonics have been

worked out, although

we have come to recognize that the Earth is a

complex, interconnected

system involving the

solid Earth, the atmosphere, hydrosphere,

cryosphere, and biosphere. We are still in

the infancy stage of understanding this system.

Our focus now is understanding the processes that drive plate motions, deform the Earth’s

surface, and influence climate. Our goal is to construct predictive models that can forecast

change or catastrophic events and predict the consequences of such changes and events

through a concerted effort to address the defining challenges identified in this report.

All of these challenges, at least in part, address the processes that transform the Earth’s surface. Nearly all of the changes to the Earth’s surface are driven, in one manner or another,

by the internal heat transport and dynamics of the Earth’s interior.

Plate tectonic theory explains the large-scale motions of the outer surface of the Earth. In

most cases these motions are associated with the cumulative displacement of earthquakes

occurring along and near plate boundaries. What loading processes control the spatial and

temporal patterns of earthquakes? How do fault systems interact and over what time

scales? How broadly is plate “boundary” deformation distributed?

Earthquakes are just one of a number of

natural processes that shape the landscape. Landslides, floods, tsunamis, debris flows, storm surges, and volcanic

eruptions sculpt and deform the land as

well. How do biologic and climatic inputs modulate the effects of tectonic

processes acting on the Earth’s surface?

What properties should be monitored

remotely to provide real-time prediction

of natural hazards and their impacts?

On May 4, 2000, a prescribed fire set

at Bandelier National Monument,

New Mexico, raged out of control

due to high winds and dry conditions, threatening the nearby town

of Los Alamos. In all, more than

20,000 people were evacuated and

more than 200 houses were destroyed. Images acquired by the

Enhanced Thematic Mapper Plus

(ETM+) sensor aboard NASA's

Landsat 7 satellite reveal the extent

of the damage. Combining one visible and two infrared channels results in a false-color image where

vegetation appears as bright to dark

green. Rangeland appears pink to

light purple. Areas with extensive

pavement or urban development

appear light blue or white to

purple. The areas recently burned

appear bright red.

Lava flows are a constant

presence on the Hawaiian

Islands but still pose questions to scientists trying to

understand the physical

properties of magma systems, such as magma ascent

rates, composition, and the

connections between surface deformation and

magma chamber activity.
.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Global sea-level change has the potential for

a devastating transformation of the Earth’s

surface worldwide. Sea level is the result of a

delicate balance among competing geophysical

processes within the solid Earth–atmosphere–

hydrosphere–cryosphere system. Can we model

the coupled processes that result in the natural

variability in sea level? How can we recognize

and model the effects of human activity amidst

this natural variability? How do feedbacks affect the natural processes?

Processes occurring deep within the Earth drive much of the deformation and change that

occurs at the Earth’s surface. How does the mantle flow at depth? How do the forces in the

mantle and crust cause surface changes? The connections between the core and the Earth’s

surface through the mantle and crust offer the keys to answering these questions.

The removal of heat from the core by the convecting mantle drives the geodynamo that

generates the Earth’s magnetic field. Much recent progress has been made in modeling the

dynamo process, yet much remains to be understood. How is the magnetic field evolving on

annual to decadal time scales? For how much longer will the current rate of decay of the

field, sufficiently rapid to eliminate the dipole in 2000 years, be maintained? What role does

the core play in the angular momentum balance of the Earth on decadal time scales? How

important is the magnetic field in modulating the possible effects of space weather on the

atmosphere, and hence on climate?

The goal of this report is to expand on the NASA Earth Science Research Strategy by recommending a long-term vision and strategy for solid-Earth science at NASA. The accompanying

integrated program described in this report provides critical input for the next great revolution in Earth sciences, just as the military-driven data sets of the last century led to the

theory of plate tectonics. This next revolution will involve development of predictive models of complex, interconnected Earth processes. For these models to be successful, particularly for an understanding of hazards, high-resolution, global observations with real-time or

near-real-time data streams and processing will be required. Integrating the huge quantities

of data and information being collected into forecast models will demand that information

technology resources be developed in concert with advanced sensor and detection capabilities. Understanding the complex dynamics of the solid Earth will require sustained aggressive investments in science and technology over the next decades.

12

The potential rise in sea level

caused by melting of the

Greenland ice sheets seriously

jeopardizes low-lying areas

such as the Florida coast. Red

shows where land would be

submerged for an estimated

5-m sea-level rise.
The 25-year scientific program outlined in

this report is extremely ambitious. The scientific challenges are broad, and they address

goals common to the entire solid-Earth science community. Our success in meeting

these challenges will depend on the close

coordination and collaboration with other

programs within NASA, with other federal

agencies, and with international space

agencies.

Partnering with Other NASA

Programs

Within NASA there is a significant diversity

of research and application programs. The

Solid Earth Science Program works closely

with other agency programs to achieve common goals. For example, by combining research, observation, and modeling efforts with another ESE program, Cryospheric Sciences,

we expect to make significant advances in our understanding of ice mass balance and sealevel change. Additional examples include the overlapping interests and capabilities of

those programs addressing hydrologic and biogeochemical cycles, soil properties, and land

cover and surface change. The breadth of NASA’s research programs benefits especially

those scientific challenges where cross-cutting interests focus attention and resources. Of

no less importance is the role of the agency’s Technology and Applications programs. The

ESE Technology Program supports research by developing advanced technology and tools

associated with orbital and suborbital missions using innovative remote-sensing technologies. The mission of the ESE Applications Program is to expand and accelerate the realization of societal and economic benefits from Earth science, information, and technology.

Partnering with Other Federal Agencies

Solid-Earth science initiatives sponsored by other federal agencies will enhance NASA’s efforts to meet the scientific challenges outlined in this report and will allow the development of a predictive capability for our restless Earth. For example, NASA partners with the

National Science Foundation (NSF), the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), and the National

Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) on a number of programs that address in

a complementary fashion the goals of solid-Earth science at NASA. Interagency cooperation

within these programs promises to advance significantly our understanding of the Earth’s

crust and mantle, earthquakes, and volcanoes. Among these programs are:

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

. 13

Essential Partnerships

Despite benefits of space-based

observations, crucial measurements often need to be made

from the ground. Field geologists from agencies such as the

USGS complement NASA's

solid-Earth program, and it is

through such partnerships that

many advances will be made.
.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The NSF EarthScope initiative involves four integrated components: USArray, a moving array of broadband seismic instruments; the San Andreas Fault Observatory at Depth

(SAFOD), involving deep drilling and instrumentation at depth; the Plate Boundary Observatory (PBO), primarily an array of continuous GPS stations and strainmeters to be deployed in the western U.S.; and a dedicated InSAR mission for obtaining synoptic information about crustal deformation globally. The first three components of EarthScope are expected to be led by NSF, but NASA can contribute to PBO through its accumulated expertise

in space-based geodesy and GPS. NASA should be the lead for a dedicated InSAR mission.

The NSF seafloor observatory initiative, Dynamics of Earth and Ocean Systems (DEOS), includes as its largest component the North East Pacific Time-series Undersea Networked Experiments (NEPTUNE) project to instrument the Juan de Fuca plate offshore of the Pacific

northwest. For this and other such initiatives, seafloor geodesy will be one of the technological and scientific frontiers.

NOAA’s Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellites (GOES) provide the frequent

(at least once per hour) spaceborne observations of the western hemisphere that are important for the detection of both volcanic plumes and lava flow hotspots. In addition, via

agreements with foreign counterparts, NOAA provides NASA with prompt access to similar

geostationary data covering most of the rest of the world. Sites of volcanic activity outside

the field of view of GOES are also being monitored daily with the Advanced Very High

Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) on the NOAA polar orbiting satellites. This capability is reinforced by NASA’s own Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER) and Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectrometer (MODIS) instruments on the

14

This seismic hazard map was

produced by the Global Seismic

Hazard Assessment Program

(GSHAP).Launched in 1992,

GSHAP promoted a regionally

coordinated, homogeneous approach to seismic hazard evaluation, intended for national decision makers and engineers responsible for land-use planning

and improved building design

and construction.The coloring

shows the hazard risk (from low

in blue to very high in red),

which is related to the probability that peak ground acceleration will exceed a given level

within the next 50 years.The

areas of highest risk are prime

candidates for coordinated

space and ground observations.

0 1000 2000

0 1000 2000

Low

Peak Ground Acceleration (m/s)

10% Probability of Exceedance in 50 Years, 475-Year Return Period

0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.6 2.4 3.2 4.0 4.8

Hazard

Mod.

Hazard

High

Hazard

V. High

Hazard
.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

. 15

The Shuttle Radar Topography

Mission (SRTM), an extremely

successful partnership between

NASA and the National Imagery and Mapping Agency

(NIMA), produced critical elevation data for 80% of Earth’s

landmass. This perspective view

of a portion of the San

Andreas fault was generated

using SRTM data and an enhanced, true-color Landsat satellite image (vertical exaggeration 2:1). The view shown looks

southeast along the San

Andreas where it cuts along

the base of the mountains in

the Temblor Range near

Bakersfield. The fault is the distinctively linear feature to the

right of the mountains.

Terra and Aqua platforms. NASA relies as well on the NOAA AVHRR for sea-surface temperature measurements that are critical to our understanding of sea-level rise.

Providing ground truth and validating remote-sensing observations will require close collaboration between NASA and USGS scientists analyzing real-time, land-based hazard

monitoring networks, including the Advanced National Seismic System (ANSS), high-resolution GPS and microearthquake networks, and the National Streamgaging Network. For

example, volcanologists supported by NASA and USGS could work toward developing a remote predictive capability for volcanic eruptions. The documentation of surface deformation with InSAR and the integration of space-based remote sensing with infrared imaging

and other tools by NASA could be combined with surface monitoring by others of microearthquake migration, harmonic tremor development, and borehole strain. On the basis

of case studies with the full complement of measurements, behavior precursory to eruptions might be recognizable solely from space observations in remote areas where no landbased observations are available.

International Partnerships

International satellite partnerships — e.g., GRACE (Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment, a joint NASA/German Earth system science pathfinder mission), Oersted (Danish

magnetic mission), SAC-C (Argentine and Danish magnetic mission), CHAMP (Challenging

Minisatellite Payload, a German gravity and magnetic mission), and the Radarsat series

(Canadian SAR) — enable NASA to develop a broad range of observation types, to acquire

rich data sets that are shared internationally, and to avoid high initial development costs.

By designing a program architecture that schedules missions with respect to expected international developments (without wholly relying on them), NASA greatly improves the

effectiveness of its scientific investment.

For example, the Canadian Radarsats employ C-band mapping, which is particularly useful

for ice dynamics and topography, but that satellite series lacks an L-band frequency. By focusing on L-band InSAR development, NASA complements and addresses gaps left by existing and planned missions. Together with

more than 100 organizations worldwide, NASA

supports international services that maintain

the measurement, analysis, and archiving infrastructure of geodetic networks and serve

as a forum for innovation, research, and standards. Space missions such as CHAMP and

GRACE have been initiated in large part

through the venue of international cooperation that these services provide.
.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Challenge

Earthquakes are among nature’s most

complex phenomena, threatening many of

the world’s population centers. A great

Pacific Rim earthquake near a major economic area might cause damages well in

excess of one trillion dollars and tens of

thousands of casualties. Reaching an understanding of earthquake fault systems is

required in order to address the issue of

their predictability, with the goal of mitigating their impact.

16

W

 Expected Accomplishments

• Characterization of motions of

the Earth’s surface and their

variability on a global scale

• Understanding of fault interactions and transfer of stress

through the crust

• Models that predict the behavior of earthquake systems

 Benefits for the Nation

• Enabling of rapid response to

seismic disasters worldwide

• Enhanced global maps of

natural hazards to support

mitigation strategies

• Determination of the existence

of local and regional precursors to earthquakes

“The laws of nature are written deep in the

folds and faults of the earth.”

John Joseph Lynch, former

president of the New York

Academy of Sciences, 1963

40

30

20

10

0

40 20 0 20

Displacement from the 1999 magnitude 7.1

Hector Mine earthquake in California as

measured using InSAR techniques. The radar

echoes are reduced to interferograms by

calculating the phase differences between

images from multiple satellite passes. Color

(using a logarithmic scale) represents horizontal displacement in units of meters.

Arrows show both magnitude and direction.

The San Andreas fault cuts

through 1,200 km of California

and is one of the most active

fault systems in the world.

Key questions include:

• How do individual faults behave and

interact as part of an integrated system?

• What are the mechanical properties

of the crust and mantle that control

deformation?

• To what extent can earthquakes be

forecast?

Investigations of surface deformation,

plate-boundary motion, frictional properties of faults, and mechanical properties

of the Earth’s crust are necessary to determine what controls the spatial and temporal patterns of earthquakes. Spacebased observations allow us to follow the

entire earthquake cycle, including the

aseismic accumulation of strain. These

new measurements are providing insights

into how stress is transferred between

faults, how much energy is released by

earthquakes versus other modes of deformation, and how faults fail.

Fully modeling the earthquake system requires knowledge of both current and

past motions and fault interactions. It is

necessary to measure the ongoing deformation associated with plate tectonics

and motion along faults. It is also necessary to obtain detailed topographic and

geomorphic characteristics of faults in order to better understand earthquake history. Targeted measurements along plateboundary zones can address how fault

systems interact. Because we are discovering that such interactions may extend to

hundreds of kilometers distance, explor10

20

30

40

50

40

S N Distance, km

W E Distance, km

0.01 0.1 1
Geodetic data from ~250 GPS stations primarily within the SCIGN array in Southern California provide a powerful tool for studying surface deformation and earthquakes, such as

the slow strain buildup along the San Andreas and other faults. The inset shows the

change in the north–south position of a SCIGN station near Palm Springs before and after

the Hector Mine earthquake (about 50 miles from the epicenter).

17

What We Know and Need to

Learn about Deformation at

Plate Boundaries and

Earthquakes

Our knowledge of Earth surface deformation is discontinuous in both time and

space. At global scales, plates move

steadily relative to each other over long

periods. Plate-boundary zones are typically broad on continents and narrow in

oceanic regions. Plate boundary zones can

be made up of many faults separated by

The surface velocity field of western North

America, and the Los Angeles basin (inset),

as observed by GPS.

Time of

Hector Mine

Earthquake

40

20

–20

–40

Millimeters North

0

1998 1999 2000

atory large-scale measurements are also required until we understand these systems

better. For example, by understanding the

stress changes that occur after major earthquakes, it may be possible to determine

more reliably the probability of future

earthquakes occurring at other locations

either rigid or deforming blocks. Elastic

strain accumulates in a broad zone across a

fault and is released suddenly during an

earthquake. The crust continues to respond

following earthquakes. Faults can continue

to slip for years, and deformation propagates in the crustal layer and upper mantle

as stresses are redistributed over decades or

even centuries. Recent evidence indicates

that faults interact, and earthquakes can influence faults up to several hundred kilometers away. This influence is probably determined by the structure and composition

of crustal layers and frictional properties of

faults and can best be understood by observing and simulating the motions of the

Earth’s surface throughout several seismic

cycles.

Next Steps

To achieve a better understanding of the

nature of deformation at plate boundaries

requires information on the changes occurring at the Earth’s surface, including the

seafloor, and within the interior. Varying

temporal and spatial sampling requirements

and accuracies dictate specific observational

approaches: GPS networks, InSAR constellations, and spaceborne laser altimetry and lidar will be needed to provide dense spatial

and temporal sampling and high-accuracy

observations of the changes on the Earth’s

surface. These data will complement information obtained from seismic networks,

seafloor geodesy, borehole arrays, and

highly accurate gravity measurements. The

ensemble of data combined with advanced

geophysical modeling will allow quantitative prediction of many aspects of fault

zone deformation.

in the system. Analyses of the transient

changes and spatial complexity of deformation are likely to reveal previously unrecognized properties of the faults and of the

Earth’s crust. A complete program of study

will integrate global-scale measurements

and large-scale computing with laboratory

and in situ measurements sponsored by

other agencies to treat in an integrated

fashion all aspects of the earthquake physics problem.

20 mm/yr 0 200 km

20 mm/yr
The Challenge

In order to lessen the impact of natural

hazards, we need to characterize, understand, and predict the phenomena that

cause them. The land surface is the dynamic interface between the lithosphere,

hydrosphere, and biosphere. It is where

interactions represent the most direct

and commonly occurring impacts of solidEarth science on humans. Landslides,

floods, tsunamis, debris flows, storm

surges, earthquakes, and volcanic eruptions sculpt and deform the land. The

Earth’s surface constitutes the geomorphic record of past tectonic–climatic interactions and is the topographic template

upon which new natural hazards are

generated. The challenge presented by

the land surface is three-fold: to unravel

the record of past interactions embedded

in this surface, to determine the relative

roles of natural and human-induced

change, and to understand processes

that act on this surface in order to predict

and mitigate natural hazards. Reconstruction of past erosion, deformation, and

deposition and quantification of tectonic,

climatic, and biologic inputs to the evolving landscape will underpin the ability to

develop a process-based understanding

of the Earth’s dynamic surface.

 Expected Accomplishments

• Development of a process-based understanding of the tectonic–

climatic–biotic interactions that create landscapes

• Quantification of natural baselines and rates of change of the land surface

• Quantification of the causes, magnitude, and development in time and

space of natural hazards

• Assessment of the relative roles of natural and human-induced changes

 Benefits for the Nation

• Real-time prediction of the progression of floods, landslides, and coastal

erosion

• Assessment of susceptibility to damage by natural hazards

• Quantification of watershed dynamics, hydrology, and landscape response

• Definition of the human role in influencing the landscape and abating and

aggravating hazards

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

What We Know and Need to

Learn about Land Surface

Change and Natural Hazards

We know the land surface evolves as tectonic forces cause deformation and as

transient hydrologic and biologic forces

mediate erosion and deposition on the

surface. The majority of the destructive

Prediction of hazardous processes such as

floods or landslides requires quantification

of both changing landscape characteristics

and climatic inputs.

18

Rainfall Intensity

and Duration

Geology, Soils,

and Strength

Vegetation

Cover

River

Stage

Soil

Moisture

Catchment

Geometry

Slope

Angles
U.S. earthquakes of the last twenty years

occurred on faults that did not rupture the

surface, although they deformed the land

surface above the fault and promoted new

patterns of erosion. Interpretation of the

deformed land surface allows us to construct rates of fault growth and past seismic activity. As large storms rain upon the

land, topography, soils, vegetation, and

rainfall intensity determine how floods

and landslides are generated. We know

that the amount of antecedent rainfall,

soil cohesion and water content, recent

fire history, water routing through the

landscape, and hillslope angles all interact

to determine where and when a landslide

will occur. Similar interactions determine

how flood waves will migrate through a

catchment and how much sediment will

be eroded, transported, and deposited

during a storm.

Next Steps

Remotely sensed data play an integral role

in reconstructing the recent history of the

land surface and in predicting hazards due

to events such as floods and landslides.

Because land-surface properties change

through time, remote sensing of such

changes yields critical time control on

landscape evolution. Remotely sensed

data can determine properties of the surface and atmosphere in real time and with

a high spatial resolution. Recognition that

destructive floods or landslides can be

launched by intense, short-lived storm

cells a few kilometers in width pinpoints

the need for higher spatial and temporal

resolution of remotely sensed data. At

present, even “well monitored” river

catchments commonly have only a few

gauges measuring precipitation and discharge. Few data exist on soil moisture, 19

thickness, and strength, or on vegetation

cover, fire history, or detailed topography.

The only practical way to gather these

data is through implementation of a

broad-based remote-sensing program. The

height and width of rivers, as well as rainfall intensity and amounts, need to be

measured hourly during storms. Developing a process-based understanding of

natural hazards depends on studies of the

character of previous and ongoing events.

Information needed to address the challenges falls into the categories of surface,

subsurface, and hydrologic characterization. These categories have diverse observational requirements. Those that change

rapidly, such as river stage or precipitation, call for hourly measurements,

whereas others, such as vegetation, com-

“A man should examine for himself the great piles of superimposed strata, and watch the rivulets bringing down mud, and the waves wearing away the sea-cliffs, in order to comprehend

something about the duration of past time, the monuments of which we see all around us.”

Charles Darwin, from the Origin of Species

monly require seasonal measurements. Occasional (5–10 yr) quantification of soil

composition and thickness would suffice

in areas governed by gradual processes,

but more frequent measurements will be

needed in areas affected by such dynamic

events as flooding or landsliding. The remote sensors that will provide these data

include InSAR, GPS, visible and near infrared/thermal infrared (VNIR/TIR) imaging,

multi-parameter SAR, laser altimetry, and

microwave imaging. These observations

will need to be augmented with extensive

land-based measurements and data from

existing and new hydrologic, seismologic,

and geodetic arrays. By means of frequent, high-resolution remote sensing, a

new capability will emerge for predicting

hazards caused by tectonic–climate–land

surface interactions.

Wheeler Ridge in Southern California is an example of a rapidly growing fold

above a blind thrust. High-resolution topography defines uplift rates, erosion, and

the interactions that produce natural hazards.

Reconstructed Fold

Before Erosion

Present Topography

Eroded Volume Depth of

erosion

200 m

0

50

100

150

100

900 m

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

Elevation
.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

 Expected Accomplishments

• Accurate estimation and prediction

of global hydrological mass fluxes,

including those of ice sheets and

glaciers.

• Separation and prediction of steric

(thermal and salinity) and mass-budget contributions in sea-level change.

• Separation of solid-Earth vertical motion (tectonic, post-glacial rebound,

and environmental) from true sealevel change.

Coastal erosion, such as that shown above in Pacifica, California, is a pervasive problem that

threatens many homeowners.

“Glaciers are delicate and individual things, like humans.

Instability is built into them.”

Will Harrison, glaciologist,1986

20

W

 Benefits for the Nation

• Improved estimates of future sealevel rise

• Improved assessment of coastal erosion due to sea-level rise

• Long-term planning for coastal communities affected by sea-level rise

The Challenge

Today more than 100 million people worldwide live on coastlines within one meter of

mean sea level. Any short-term or long-term

sea-level change relative to vertical ground

motion is of great societal and economic concern. The very survival of many island states

and deltaic coasts is threatened by sea-level

rise. Inasmuch as paleo-environmental and historical data have clearly indicated the occurrence of such changes in the past, new scientific information on the nature and causes of

sea-level change — and the development of a

quantitative predictive capability — are of utmost importance for the future. This topic is

inherently an interdisciplinary science problem

addressed within NASA by the Cryospheric Science, Ocean Science, Hydrology, and Solid

Earth Science Programs.

The 10–20 cm global sea-level rise recorded

over the last century has been broadly attributed to two effects: the steric effect (thermal

expansion and salinity-density compensation

of sea water) of changes in global climate, and

mass-budget changes due to a number of competing geophysical and hydrological processes

in the solid Earth–atmosphere–hydrosphere–

cryosphere system. While the steric effect is

primarily a climatic issue, the Solid Earth Science Program is poised for a fundamental contribution by separating the two effects via a

combined use of space geodetic measurements of sea-surface topography and timevariable gravity. The mass-budget changes include water exchange from polar ice sheets

and mountain glaciers to the ocean, atmospheric water vapor and land hydrological

variations, and human effects such as water

impoundment in artificial reservoirs and extraction of groundwater. These exchanges are
all superimposed on the vertical motions

of the solid Earth due to tectonics, rebound of the lithosphere from past and

present deglaciation, and other local

ground motions. A number of space geodetic measurements of sea-surface topography, ice mass, gravity, and ground motions are directly relevant. A complete

knowledge of sea-level change will then

emerge and be used for the development

of predictive global and regional models.

What We Know and Need

to Learn about the Mass

Balance of Earth’s Ice Cover

and Sea-Level Change

Globally sea level is estimated to rise by

1.5–2 mm/year, but few details are known.

The relative contributions of the steric and

mass-budget effects are under debate, as

are their spatial and temporal variations.

We are presently not certain whether

Greenland and Antarctica are gaining or

losing net ice mass. Estimates of mountain

glacier melting are incomplete. The global

land hydrological budget is not well

known. Even the amount of artificial reservoir water impoundment is uncertain by

perhaps a factor of two. If global warming

continues, a most immediate and potentially dominant mass-budget contribution

to sea-level change is likely to come from

the melting of ice masses. The melting of

temperate glaciers could raise sea level by

a few tens of centimeters; the melting of

the ice sheets in West Antarctica could

raise sea level by several meters. Global

and temporally continuous monitoring of

sea-surface topography, ice mass, gravity,

and ground motions is needed. Knowing

how the present ocean “container” deforms is also necessary to predict the consequences of sea-level change. On a global

Elevation changes in Greenland have been

measured by airborne laser altimetry. The

ice sheet appears to be in balance with

snow accumulation at high elevation, but

thinning predominates at low elevation.

Overall, the Greenland Ice Sheet is estimated to lose mass to the ocean. Dramatic

thinning occurs in largely understudied

southeastern Greenland.

Next Steps

Measuring absolute as well as relative sealevel change is a geodetic endeavor. Further

advances in geodetic measurement techniques

must provide information on sea-level

changes and consequences in a routine fashion, with enhanced geographical coverage,

spatial and temporal resolution, and measurement accuracy. Research is needed to integrate the various relevant measurements —

changes in sea- and ice-surface topography,

time-variable gravity, deformation of the surface of the solid Earth (particularly along

coastlines), all under a uniform terrestrial

reference frame, together with in situ measurements from tide gauges and buoys,

remote-sensing data such as sea-surface

temperature and salinity, and global atmosphere–hydrosphere–cryosphere models that

assimilate diverse climatic data types.

21

62°

66°

70°

74°

80°

Aerial photo sequence spanning 50 years showing the progressive drowning and loss of

coastal marshes in Blackwater National Wildlife Refuge near Cambridge, Maryland, in

response to a rise in sea level relative to local land. The area shown is about 1 km across.

1938 1957 1972 1988

scale, that requirement calls for an accurate

post-glacial rebound model incorporating

knowledge of the Earth’s internal mechanical

properties and the history of past ice ages. At

any given location along the coastline, additional tectonic motion and environmental impacts such as groundwater withdrawal need

to be monitored and understood.

64°

68°

72°

76°

78°

60°

1200 m

1700 m

2200 m

2700 m

Continental

Map

Ice Edge

 700 m

0.225 – 0.250

0.200 – 0.225

0.175 – 0.200

0.150 – 0.175

0.125 – 0.150

0.100 – 0.125

0.075 – 0.100

0.050 – 0.075

0.025 – 0.050

0.000 – 0.025

> 0.275

0.250 – 0.275

–0.275 – 0.000

–0.050 – –0.025

–0.075 – –0.050

–0.100 – –0.075

–0.125 – –0.100

–0.150 – –0.125

–0.175 – –0.150

–0.200 – –0.175

–0.225 – –0.200

–0.250 – –0.225

–0.275 – –0.250

< –0.275

310° 320°

330°

340°

300°

290°

Elevation Change in m/yr
.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

 Expected Accomplishments

• Up-to-date global inventory of active

terrestrial volcanoes

• Further definition of the relationships among deformation, seismicity,

intrusions, and eruptions

• Volcanic activity warning system

• Forecasting of volcanic activity on

progressively longer time scales

 Benefits for the Nation

• Detection of ash and plume products

to provide warnings for air travel

• Hazard mitigation due to improved

volcanic activity warnings

• Advanced planning for high-risk

populations near volcanic regions

22

The 1980 eruption of Mount St. Helens, triggered by a magnitude 5.1 earthquake, dramatically affected the northwest U.S. Four hundred meters of the peak collapsed or blew outwards. As a result, 650 square kilometers of recreation, timber, and private lands were damaged by a lateral blast, and an estimated 150 million cubic meters of material were deposited directly by lahars (volcanic mudflows) into the river channels.

developed. Because eruptions are episodic

and occur throughout the globe, we must

rely on methods that give us observations

of volcanic activity everywhere on the

planet. Primary to our understanding of

eruptive systems are the identification and

characterization of active volcanoes. From

the volcanoes rimming the Pacific to new

eruptions on the ocean floor, there are

thousands of volcanoes whose level of activity is poorly known. Indicators of activity include surface deformation, seismicity,

thermal emissions, changes in gravity,

emission of gasses, and actual eruptions.

We know little, however, about how these

phenomena are interrelated. The physical

mechanisms that cause surface deformation and those that control the rates and

styles of eruptions are poorly understood.

The ability to predict the timing, magnitude, and style of volcanic eruptions is an

important but generally unmet goal.

What We Know and Need to

Learn about Magmatic Systems

Existing and foreseeable advances in technology allow us to consider a variety of

questions critical to advancing our understanding of volcanic systems. Key observations already allow limited volcanic eruption forecasting. For example, under simThe Challenge

Volcanoes are direct links to the interior of

the Earth, and their eruptive power and

often-long intervals of quiet dormancy inspire fear and, in some societies, reverence. We are entering a period of rapid

growth in our understanding of volcanoes, as diverse measurements are integrated and new observational tools are

“A cloud... shot up to a great height in the form of a very tall trunk, which spread itself out at

the top into a sort of branches. This phenomenon seemed ... extraordinary, and worth further looking into.”

Pliny the Elder on the eruption of Mount Vesuvius, 79 AD

and Volcanoes
Deformation measured by InSAR at Isabela

and Fernandina, islands in the Galápagos

archipelago. Also shown is the maximum

uplift at each volcano, assuming that displacements are vertical. Differences in the

displacement patterns from volcano to volcano illustrate the complex range of deformation mechanisms that can occur.

plifying assumptions of an elastic crust

and a limited range of possible magma

chamber shapes, available measurements

of surface deformation are routinely used

to quantify the location and geometry of

active magmatic bodies. Recent geodetic

observations are also beginning to document a wide variety of complex sources of

deformation, including flank instabilities,

rift systems, and crater floor dynamics. Recent studies have also demonstrated the

ability to measure thermal anomalies associated with volcanic plumes and degassing

of SO2

 and CO2. Many challenges remain,

however. We must assess the geometry of

the volcanic plumbing system, the physical

properties of the magma (composition,

volatile content), magma ascent rates, and

the location and mechanisms of volatile

exsolution. A key question is how we determine a volcano’s level of activity,

whether by surface deformation, variations in gravity, heat flux, mass transports, seismicity, or gas emissions. At any

given time, only one of these manifestations of activity may be present. The extent to which we can currently predict

eruptions is largely limited by a lack of

observations.

Next Steps

To make significant progress addressing

these volcanological challenges, we need

a globally comprehensive compilation of

observations of all major land volcanoes.

This inventory will rely principally on geodetic and spectroscopic observations.

From the geodetic standpoint, full vector

deformation maps are required to reduce

ambiguities in inferences of magma chamber geometry. Given the sporadic nature

of volcanic activity, a global archive updated on weekly time intervals is required. Such time intervals would also

permit us to gain sensitivity to low-level

but more nearly continuous processes. In

the event of an eruption, shorter time intervals are desired, with updating several

times per day. However, in these cases,

only a spotlight view of a targeted area of

the globe is needed. A similar rationale

holds for the timing of spectroscopic measurements. Such measurements provide

sensitivity to heat flux and gas emissions

(e.g., SO2

 and CO2). Given the proper temporal resolution, temperature changes on

the order of 0.5 K and accurate measurements of gas emissions, along with surface deformation maps, may allow forecasting of eruptions. Satellite radar interferometry observations and models of surface deformation of Italy's Mt.

Etna volcano prior to eruption shows inflation of the central magma chamber that induced

movement of its unstable eastern flank. Bottom row shows a physical model of the magma

chamber and fault dislocation solution: left, map view looking through the topography;

right, side view, with the sense of flank motion indicated by the arrow. 23

Observed Modeled

Sources

Ecuador

Fernandina

Eruption 1995

90 cm uplift above

shallow intrusions

Cerro Azul

Eruption 1998

15 cm subsidence

Lava flow

subsidence

Wolf

9 cm uplift

Darwin

22 cm uplift

Alcedo

>90 cm uplift

Sierra Negra

240 cm uplift

Urvina

Bay

LOS displacement (cm)

0 20 40

Santiago

Isabela

10 km

N

Galapagos

Ecuador

5°N 80°W

0°

Range Displacement (2.8 cm)

–10

–5

0

5

Elevation (km)

–10

–5

0

Northing (km) 10

5

–10 –5 0 10 5

Easting (km)

–10 –5 0 10 5

Easting (km)

10 –10

Northing

Az 190 Elev 0

Az 180 Elev 90
The Challenge

Tectonic processes in the mantle and crust are

the engine responsible for seismicity, volcanism,

and mountain building. Mantle convection converts thermal energy from radioactive decay and

the cooling of the Earth into the continuous displacements responsible for plate tectonics. The

deformation of the Earth’s surface required to

accommodate plate tectonics occurs primarily on

plate boundary faults and relatively broad zones

of deformation adjacent to the plate boundaries

in the continents. The forces that drive the motions of the plates, however, are not well quantified. What are the relative roles of slab “pull,”

ridge “push,” and basal tractions?

Mantle convection has been studied through

computer simulations and laboratory analogue

experiments, but models to date are limited in

their ability to approximate Earth conditions at

high resolution. Mantle seismic tomography is

producing three-dimensional images of seismic

velocity anomalies of increasingly sharper resolution, and studies of seismic wave anisotropy

offer the promise of constraining the signature

of alignment of mantle mineral grains by convective flow. The extent to which the seismic velocity anomalies seen in tomographic images are

correlatable to the density anomalies that drive

convective motions, however, is far from clear.

The global gravity field and long-wavelength topography provide key integrative measures of

these mantle density anomalies, although their

interpretation requires information on the structure of the tectonic plates and the variation of

viscosity within the mantle. Improved information on plate characteristics and mantle viscosity

can come, in turn, from measurements of the

time-dependent response of global gravity, topography, and Earth rotation to loading and unloading by glaciers, oceans, and other forcings.

 Expected Accomplishments

• Global measurement of vertical intraplate deformation at mm/yr accuracy

• Measurement of global seafloor topography at 50-m vertical accuracy and

5-km horizontal resolution

• Improved measurements of the Earth’s rotation and length of day (LOD)

• Integration of space-based geodetic observations with complementary seismic

imaging studies

 Benefits for the Nation

• Understanding the nature of mantle and crustal dynamics that give rise to

earthquakes and volcanoes

• Better prediction of sea-level change from post-glacial rebound

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

W

The free air gravity field of North America and the North Atlantic.

Negative anomalies are indicated by cool colors and are associated

with incomplete glacial rebound; positive anomalies are indicated by

warm colors and are primarily associated with ocean ridge structure

and western North America.

24
“ Set the foot down with distrust on the crust of the world — it is thin.”

Edna St. Vincent Millay, from her poem, Huntsman,

What Quarry?

Mantle cross section integrates measurements of seismic waves that have traveled through

the planet. Regions where wave velocity is anomalously high (blue) are thought to denote

cold, dense rock. Regions where wave velocity is anomalously low (yellow) are thought to

correspond to hot, less-dense rock.

Understanding mantle convection, and its

coupling to the motions of the crust and

lithosphere, will require a combination of

approaches. Improved definition of the

time-dependent gravity field and longwavelength shape of the Earth must be

combined with sharpened images of seismic

wave speeds and their direction dependence as well as continued measurement

of variations in Earth rotation parameters.

Sophisticated models of three-dimensional,

time-dependent mantle flow must ultimately be capable of predicting the full

suite of observable quantities.

What We Know and Need to

Learn about the Mantle and

Crust

Plate tectonics is a consequence of mantle

convection. Mantle processes also influence

surface deformation, internal mass redistribution, and changes in Earth’s length of day

(LOD).

While we have determined the relative velocities among plates from surface geodetic

observations, we do not know how mantle

flow is coupled to the motions of the tectonic plates. There are major uncertainties

concerning the geometry of mantle flow at

depth. We do not know, for instance,

whether the pattern of mantle convection

is simple or complex. We have a relatively

poor understanding of the dynamics of subduction at ocean trenches, or the mechanism for initiation of new subduction

zones. While we generally understand the

large-scale thermal structure of mid-ocean

ridges and oceanic plates with ages less

than about 50 million years, there are still

questions about structure at small spatial

scales as well as for older oceanic plates

and continental plates. We lack information

on the deep structure and distribution

of mantle plumes. We do not understand

in detail the mechanisms that lead to island

volcanism adjacent to ocean trenches.

While oceanic crust is thought to be formed

by partial melting of mantle rock at depth

beneath an ocean ridge, we don’t understand how continental crust is formed

or whether recycling of the lower continental crust into the mantle is an important

process.

Next Steps

The observational approaches over the next

25 years must cover a broad range to answer these questions. Global gravity measurements will illuminate the time-varying

gravity signal, which holds keys to understanding post-glacial unloading and ocean

loading, and the mechanics of subduction.

InSAR and GPS measurements of vertical

deformation at millimeter/year accuracy

and tens of kilometers resolution are

needed both in the near term and over

longer time scales to complement time-dependent gravity measurements. High-resolution radar altimeters will reveal the smallscale gravity signals of plate boundary and

volcanic processes beneath the oceans. Terrestrial reference frame measurements using GPS, SLR, and VLBI will further enhance

an understanding of the mechanisms of

core-mantle and mantle-crust coupling.

Changes in the Earth’s length of day and

long-wavelength gravity field provide important information about mass movements throughout the Earth’s mantle.

Through diverse observational opportunities and high-performance computer modeling, the critical connections of the mantle

and crust to other components of the Earth

system can be characterized and better understood.

25

Cold Rock (Indonesian

Downwelling)

Mantle

Cold Rock

(Farallon

Plate)

North America

Hot Rock

(African

Superplume)

Outer Core

Inner Core

Africa
.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

. 26

W

• Map of magnetization of the

Earth’s crust

 Benefits for the Nation

• Forecasts of the magnetic field on

decadal time scales, important for

evaluation of the effects of space

weather on communications and

satellite operations

• Estimation of interannual and

longer changes in mean atmospheric and oceanic zonal circulation from length-of-day observations and calculations of core

circulation

 Expected Accomplishments

• Understanding the dynamo that

generates the Earth’s magnetic

field

• Separation of the external field

from the internal field on a wide

range of temporal and spatial

scales

• Determining whether it is possible

to predict changes in the Earth’s

magnetic field

• Measurement of the core’s contribution to the Earth’s rotation

• Understanding the 3-D electrical

conductivity structure of the

mantle

The top plot shows the radial component of the magnetic field at the core–

mantle boundary (CMB) determined from Oersted observations. The bottom

plot shows the fluid flow immediately beneath the CMB determined from maps

of the magnetic field at the CMB.

The Challenge

The problem of explaining the origin of

the Earth’s magnetic field was once ranked

by Albert Einstein as among the three

most important unsolved problems in

physics. Although today it is widely recognized that the Earth’s magnetic field is

generated by a dynamo that operates

in the fluid outer core, the details of how

that dynamo works remain far from

understood.

Over the past 150 years, the main (axial dipole) component of the Earth’s magnetic

field has decayed by nearly 10%, a rate

ten times faster than if the dynamo were

simply switched off. To that extent, the

dynamo today is operating more as an

anti-dynamo, a destroyer of the dipole

part of the field. Intriguingly, this decay

rate is characteristic of magnetic reversals,

which paleomagnetic observations have

shown occur on average, though with

great variability, about once every half

million years. Geographically, the recent

dipole decay is largely due to changes in

the field beneath the South Atlantic

Ocean. This pattern is connected to the

growth of the South Atlantic Magnetic

Anomaly, an area in which the field at the

Earth’s surface is now about 35% weaker

than would be expected. This hole in the

field has serious implications for lowEarth-orbit satellite operations since it impacts the radiation dosage at these altitudes. How much longer will the South Atlantic Magnetic Anomaly continue to

grow? How large will it become? Is the

+1 mT –1 mT
field reversing? These questions currently

cannot be answered because the mechanism by which the Earth’s magnetic field

is generated is only partially understood.

But long-term satellite observations combined with numerical dynamo modeling

will advance our understanding and allow

us to model the evolution of this anomaly.

In addition, satellite observations will enable mapping the three-dimensional electrical conductivity structure of the Earth,

providing important constraints on the

distribution of volatiles within the Earth.

Other important contributions include

mapping the magnetization of the Earth’s

crust and advancing our understanding of

the core’s contribution to the Earth’s angular momentum budget.

What We Know and Need to

Learn about the Earth’s

Magnetic Field and Core

The Earth’s magnetic field originates in

the fluid outer core, where self-regenerating dynamo action maintains the field

against decay. This field gives rise to both

permanent and induced magnetization in

crustal rocks and also interacts with current systems in the ionosphere and magnetosphere (space weather). These interactions give rise to fluctuating external

electromagnetic fields that in turn induce

electric currents in the Earth’s conducting

interior. The induced electric currents produce time-variable electromagnetic fields

at and above the Earth’s surface, and the

field measured at any point represents

the vector sum of contributions from the

core field, the crustal field, the external

field, and the induced electromagnetic

field. The separation of these different

signals is the greatest challenge for observational geomagnetism, yet the benefits

from doing so will be great. It would then

be possible to study short-period changes

in the field originating in the core; these

changes would enable estimation of the

core’s contribution to the Earth’s rotational

angular momentum balance on subdecadal periods. The other main contributions to the Earth’s angular momentum

balance on these time scales are atmospheric and oceanic in origin, so estimating

the core’s contribution would enable these

other contributions to be determined.

“I believe that there is a subtle magnetism in Nature, which, if we unconsciously yield to it,

will direct us aright. It is not indifferent to us which way we walk.”

Henry David Thoreau

Next Steps

Multiple observation types and scales are

required to address the challenges laid out

to study the Earth’s magnetic field. Foremost is a magnetic constellation in lowEarth orbit (LEO) that would allow measurements of the time-varying external

field at a few nT accuracy. Each of the

components of the field needs to be

mapped out using methods such as a LEO

gradiometer and a dense, ground-based

electric and magnetic observation network. Accurate reference-frame measurements will assist in determining the core’s

contribution to the angular momentum

budget. Continued active modeling efforts

will contribute greatly to advances in

understanding.

27

Progress in modeling of the geodynamo

and new satellite observations promise to

advance greatly our understanding of the

origin of the Earth’s magnetic field. In this

simulation, the outer spherical surface

with the latitude-longitude grid is the

core–mantle boundary; the inner red surface is the inner core. The magnetic field

line is color-coded. Yellow and blue signify

positive and negative radial components,

respectively.

A combination of MAGSAT data and modeling that removes the dominant main

magnetic field shows the variations in the

magnetic field of lithospheric origin at the

satellite altitude of 400 km.
.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

 o make substantial progress toward answering each of the six challenges for

 solid-Earth science, NASA must formulate a broadly conceived program with

both near-term goals and clear steps toward longer-term objectives. A fully realized

program contains elements that encompass all of the following aspects:

• Observational Strategies

• Research and Analysis

• Information Systems

• Technology Development

• Supporting Framework

• Education

By weaving each of these

essential elements into an

integrated program architecture,

the long-term goals of understanding the solid Earth and

achieving predictive capabilities can

be attained. NASA’s role in observations

is primarily the development of satellite

missions, but such projects cannot be as effective

as possible without complementary terrestrial observations and the requisite partnerships with other programs and agencies. A dedicated research and analysis program is

a critically important core activity, to ensure that newly acquired data are fully analyzed, to provide the new ideas for instrument and mission development, and to foster

unexpected scientific discoveries. This effort should include significant investments in

computation and modeling for testing theories and predictions. A number of observations needed over the next two and a half decades require a continuing investment in

advanced technology development. This modular yet broadly interlinked program architecture offers flexibility to change as scientific discoveries and programmatic requirements dictate.

This strategy builds on current capabilities and resources. It requires data from missions

and instruments that have recently flown, that are currently flying, and that are

planned to be launched in the very near future (e.g., ASTER, SRTM, SAC-C, CHAMP,

GRACE). It also relies on data from missions that are currently supported by other scientific disciplines such as the Global Precipitation Mission and the River Discharge and

Cold Regions Exploratory Missions. This strategy leverages collaborations and partnerships to the largest extent possible with other government agencies, the private sector,

and the international community. The focus in the following section is largely on new

observational requirements that have been identified by the SESWG and on the implications for required technology investments.

Recommendations for an Integrated Program

for Solid Earth Science

28

T

INFORMATION

SYSTEMS

INFORMATION

RESEARCH

AND

ANALYSIS

RESEARCH

AND

ANALYSIS

EDUCATION EDUCATION

TECHNOLOGY

DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT

SUPPORTING

FRAMEWORK

SUPPORTING

FRAMEWORK

OBSERVATIONAL

STRATEGIES

OBSERVATIONAL
.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Observational Strategies

Understanding the solid Earth and moving toward predictive capabilities where appropriate requires a broad observational strategy, incorporating numerous methodologies

(including spaceborne and ground measurements), technological advances, and

complementarity among observations. The SESWG recommends the following seven

observational strategies to address the fundamental solid-Earth questions that frame

this report.

1. Surface Deformation

The land surface deforms both vertically and horizontally as a result of a number of

geological and geophysical processes, many of which have significant implications for

natural hazards. Episodic deformations arise from earthquakes and volcanic activities

whose measurements are essential to understanding and mitigating these natural hazards. Aseismic deformation before and after earthquakes can now be measured as a result of space technologies and are key to understanding earthquakes and the Earth’s internal dynamics. Post-glacial rebound occurs by slow, large-scale deformation that provides great insight into the mechanical properties of the solid Earth. Local land subsidence due to groundwater withdrawal, river and coastal erosion and deposition, landslides, and debris flows all impact the land surface and affect human livelihood. Continuous perturbations arise from solid-Earth tides and loading by variations in atmospheric pressure, oceanic circulation, and the distribution of water and ice.

Centimeter to millimeter/year accuracies are necessary to make meaningful detection

of these land changes. The space geodetic techniques of satellite laser ranging, verylong-baseline interferometry, and geodetic GPS have in the past decade successfully

measured relative horizontal motions among tectonic plates, as well as differential

crustal movements along many active plate boundaries. In recent years they have also

detected the postglacial rebound signal and the coseismic and postseismic deformations associated with several large earthquakes.

29

1. Surface Deformation

2. High-Resolution Topography

3. Variability of Earth’s

Magnetic Field

4. Variability of Earth’s

Gravity Field

Recommended Observational Strategies

5. Imaging Spectroscopy of

Earth’s Changing Surface

6. Space Geodetic Networks and

the International Terrestrial

Reference Frame

7. Promising Techniques and

Observations
.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

. 30

–21°

–22°

–23°

–24°

–25°

–26°

289° 290° 291° (Below) Three-dimensional

rendering of subduction of

the Nazca plate beneath

western South America.

(Right) Coseismic surface

deformation from the

1995 magnitude 8.1

Antofagasta, Chile, subduction zone earthquake determined by InSAR. Each

color cycle indicates 2.8 cm of

motion in the satellite line-ofsight (LOS) direction. The horizontal projection of the LOS

vector is indicated by the arrow

at the top right. The red line

indicates the boundary between the Nazca and South

American Plates at the bottom

of the oceanic trench.

Complementary to the techniques described above, which are typically continuous in

time but limited to specific locations, two new space geodetic techniques provide spatially continuous observations that are typically limited in temporal coverage: InSAR

and laser altimetry (lidar). Both have proven successful in proof-of-concept airborne experiments, and InSAR has further demonstrated its great utility from space in detecting

land surface changes caused by earthquakes, movement of magma at depth, ice-sheet

motion, and land subsidence. InSAR measurements of surface deformation rely on repeated acquisitions of radar images, and satellite platforms permit a synoptic view of a

host of geologic processes on a global basis.

The goal of the surface deformation observational strategy is to measure spatially continuous displacements of the Earth’s surface on both temporally and globally comprehensive bases. Repeat observations must resolve rapid deformational processes such as

earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, glacial flow, and regions of devastated infrastructure
.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

due to fires and earthquakes in urban areas. The ability to map quickly these regions of

devastation will substantially improve capabilities for rapid emergency response to

these destructive forces. It is important as well to measure slow deformational processes such as interseismic strain accumulation, magma chamber pressurization, surface

displacements from migration of crustal fluids (e.g., water and oil), and motions of the

ice sheets.

Modeling to date indicates that accuracies of 1 mm/yr over 50-km horizontal scales are

needed. Such a capability will permit an assessment of how slow transient events (e.g.,

modest strains over large areas) relate to earthquakes, distinguishing between strain

accumulation on a single fault from strain on multiple faults, and accurate determination of the nucleation of earthquakes and the effects of fault asperities on earthquake

slip.

31

Measurement requirements and suggested mission phasing are:

• Immediate (1–5 years): A single dedicated InSAR satellite operating at L-band, with

left/right-looking capability and weekly access to anywhere on the globe. Such a mission should include precise orbit determination and ionospheric correction capabilities.

This mission should achieve accuracies of 1 mm/yr surface displacement over 50 km

horizontal extents in selected areas. Displacement maps should cover 100-km-wide

swaths. Continuous ground GPS observations will provide important complementary

information.

Supporting research and analysis should include time-dependent modeling of local

fault systems, including numerical mechanical models, pattern recognition, and

visualization.

Studies show that, from a

constellation of InSAR satellites, deformation maps can

be made at daily intervals or

better. One concept using

four satellites in an enhanced low Earth orbit

(1321 km altitude) would allow 100% of the Earth to be

revisited every 16 hours. The

long-term goal of hourly

global access may be

achieved by low-Earth or

geosynchronous constellations of InSAR satellites.
.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

. 32

• Near Term (5–10 years): A constellation of InSAR satellites capable of producing deformation maps at nearly daily intervals. Maps should extend several hundred kilometers in swath width and provide full vector surface displacements at accuracies of submillimeter per year over 100-km spatial extents and 1-m spatial resolution. Complementary ground and seafloor geodetic observations should continue.

Supporting research and analysis should include assimilation in near-real time of

observations into models of fault systems, volcanoes, and the crust–mantle system.

The goal should be an understanding of time- and stress-dependent crustal and mantle

properties.

• Long term (10–25 years): Hourly global access from a constellation of InSAR satellites

in low Earth or geosynchronous orbits. There should be an increase in the density of

continuous ground and seafloor geodetic observations.

Supporting research and analysis should target near-term forecasting of such natural

hazards as earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, and landslides. Fully three-dimensional,

nonlinear, spherical, time-dependent models of the solid-Earth system should be

coupled to and able to assimilate continuous streams of new data.

2. High-Resolution Topography

Accurate measurements of topography and topographic change are fundamental to

most of the science themes addressed in this report. Topographic measurement capabilities have advanced significantly in recent years. Radar observations from the

The Nyiragongo volcano in the

Congo erupted in early 2002

and subsequently sent streams

of lava into the city of Goma

(lower right, on the north shore

of Lake Kivu). More than 100

people were killed, and hundreds of thousands were forced

to flee. This computer-generated visualization combines

Landsat and ASTER satellite

images and an elevation

model from SRTM.
.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

. 33

Additionally, ASTER image data

were used to supply a partial map

of the recent lava flows (red), including a mapping of their intrusion into Goma. Topographic expression has been exaggerated

vertically by a factor of 1.5 for this

visualization. Nyiragongo and

other nearby volcanoes sit within

the East African Rift Valley, a zone

where tectonic processes are faulting, stretching, and lowering the

Earth's crust. Volcanic activity is

common here, and older but geologically recent lava flows (magenta in this depiction) are particularly apparent on the flanks of

the Nyamuragira volcano (left

background).

Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) acquired in early 2000, in cooperation with

the National Imagery and Mapping Agency (NIMA), are being used to produce a nearly

global digital topographic map with 30-m horizontal precision and 10-m vertical accuracy. A new generation of global digital elevation models with sub-meter-scale accuracy is needed to provide more accurate and frequently measured topography. Special

attention must be paid to steep terrain (the sources of landslides and some floods), because such terrain was only partially imaged by SRTM. Measurement of transient topography, such as the surfaces of rivers in flood, is also a key need. Airborne scanning

laser altimeter and InSAR techniques provide local to regional digital elevation models

with meter- to tens-of-meters-scale resolution at decimeter- to meter-level vertical accuracy. The Shuttle Laser Altimeter (SLA) demonstrated spaceborne land surface altimetry at meter-level vertical accuracy, and the upcoming Ice, Cloud, and Land Elevation

Satellite (ICESat) missions will provide comprehensive profile sampling of the Earth’s

land and ice elevations at decimeter- to meter-level accuracy. SLA and ICESat are profiling systems with along-track resolutions of 700 and 175 m, respectively.

Because direct remote sensing of seafloor topography is not feasible, our historical understanding of the morphology of the 70% of Earth’s solid surface that lies beneath

the oceans comes from observations made with single- and multi-beam echo sounders

mounted on oceanographic research vessels. The resulting data coverage is highly variable in coverage and resolution. To date, only 0.1% of the oceans has been surveyed at

100-m horizontal resolution, and large tracts of the seafloor (such as most of the southern oceans) have not been mapped at all. Seafloor topography can be inferred indirectly at lower (~10 km horizontal) resolution, however, from satellite altimeter mea-
.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

surements of the sea surface (i.e., from the marine geoid). Recent global seafloor maps

produced from spaceborne altimetry provide a large-scale view of Earth that is lacking

from traditional sources and, in fact, has provided substantial new insight into the

seafloor structure and geological history of remote parts of the globe. Forthcoming

developments in radar and laser altimeters, constrained by selected higher-resolution

shipborne measurements, could improve the resolution of global seafloor topography

and morphology to a point that would substantially advance our understanding of volcanism, faulting, sedimentation, and plate evolution in oceanic regions.

34

A specific new application of topographic measurements of the land surface is to obtain landslide inventories. Landslides are primarily associated with triggering events,

such as rainfall, snowmelt, or earthquakes. The statistics of these events, however, are

poorly documented. Since large landslide events are rare, it is essential to obtain inventories on a worldwide basis. One goal is to automate the measurement of landslide

areas and volumes using differences in topographic observations prior to and after

each landslide event.

Topographic measurements can also be used to quantify sediment deposition in arid

areas during a flood. Analyses of the topography of alluvial fans before and after a

flood will give the volume of sediment deposited.

40°N

30°N

20°N

10°N

0°

90°W 80°W 70°W 60°W 50°W 40°W 30°W 20°W 10°W 0°

Topography of the ocean

floor derived from sparse ship

soundings and dense satellite

altimeter measurements of

ocean surface height (i.e.,

geoid height). The 10-km

resolution topography reveals

the broad features of seafloor

spreading such as the median

valley along the ridge axis,

the transform faults, and the

thermal subsidence of the

cooling oceanic lithosphere.

Higher-resolution topography

can be obtained by additional

ship soundings and/or a new

higher-resolution satellite

altimeter mission.
.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Despite these advances in both methodology and analysis, topographic measurements

necessary to achieve solid-Earth science goals remain inadequate due to limits in spatial resolution, vertical accuracy, extent of coverage, and frequency of repeat observations. Because topographic data and their temporal changes are fundamental to diverse solid-Earth disciplines, the observational requirements are discipline specific.

Three classes of observations encompass the diversity of requirements: improvements

in vertical accuracy to 0.1 m in targeted regions (with frequent repeats), one-time global mapping at 0.5-m vertical accuracy to define the present topographic template

which surface processes and tectonics modify, and improved mapping of ice sheets

and glaciers. Attainment of a process-based understanding and prediction of natural

hazards is critically dependent on the determination of highly resolved and accurate

topography.

Vertical accuracy refers to the ground or water surface whether or not vegetation

cover is present (i.e., the “bald” Earth). For some applications, such as those dependent

on local slope or landform shape, the vertical accuracy need be only relative (elevation

with respect to an adjacent elevation). For others, such as those requiring regional elevation correlations or change detection, the vertical accuracy must be absolute (with

respect to a reference frame).

35

Vegetation cover and

underlying ground

topography imaged by

high-resolution airborne

scanning laser altimetry.

Terrapoint ALTMS

(Airborne Lidar

Topographic Mapping

System) data obtained

for the Puget Sound Lidar

Consortium have 1.8-m

horizontal resolution and

~20-cm vertical accuracy

(no vertical exaggeration).

Shaded Reliefs Perspective Views

Canopy Top

“Bald” Earth

Breakaway scarp

Landslide deposits

Floodplain meanders
.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

. 36

Spaceborne swath-mapping laser altimetry (imaging lidar) and dual-frequency interferometric SAR technologies, potentially in combination, hold the greatest promise for

achieving these goals. Cross-track InSAR with precision antenna spacing can map topography with centimeter-level resolution. Lidar can measure topographic change over

land, rivers, and oceans. The combined use of lidar and InSAR can provide comprehensive characterization of vegetation height and topography of high resolution and accuracy for the “bald” Earth. Considering the readiness level of these technologies and the

current status of topographic mapping activities, measurement requirements and suggested mission phasing are:

• Immediate (1–5 years): Production and public distribution of global topographic data

from the radar observations acquired by SRTM, launch the ICESat altimeter mission,

and demonstrate imaging lidar capabilities in Earth orbit on the Shuttle or International Space Station.

• Near term (5–10 years): Global mapping to supercede the SRTM data set. One-time

global mapping of the ground surface should be at 2- to 5-m resolution and 0.5-m vertical accuracy. Ice-sheet mapping, to enable data continuity with the ICESat mission,

should be at 1-km horizontal resolution, 1-cm vertical accuracy for the ice or snow surface, and a repeat interval of months (for annual changes) to years (for long-term

changes).

• Long term (10–25 years): Beginning of a continuously operating, targeted, high-resolution topographic mapping and change detection capability. Targeted local to regional

mapping, with global access, at 1-m resolution, 0.1-m vertical accuracy for the ground

and water surfaces, and a repeat frequency of hours to years depending on the rate of

topographic change.

In addition to these mission activities, an active research and analysis program should

establish methods to integrate laser and InSAR observations and to incorporate these

new sources of topographic data into studies that unravel the past history of landscape

evolution, reveal the interactions of geomorphic processes, and improve preparations

for and predictions of natural hazard events. Emphasis must also be placed on the calibration and validation of these new satellite-based sources of topographic data, to ensure that they are appropriately used in landscape studies and modeling, through comparisons to detailed ground-based and airborne measurements of topography and vegetation cover.
.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

. 37

3. Variability of Earth’s Magnetic Field

Geomagnetism provides one of three space-based techniques to probe the Earth’s interior. (The other two are gravity and Earth rotation.) Geomagnetic studies are currently

limited by a paucity of observations and attendant difficulty in their interpretation. Recent advances in nanosatellite technology hold the promise for cost-effective geomagnetic constellation operations. The International Decade of Geopotential Research endorsed by the International Association of Geomagnetism and Aeronomy (IAGA) and

the International Association of Geodesy (IAG) has played a major role in encouraging

programs that have led to the launch of Oersted, Sunsat, CHAMP, and SAC-C over the

last five years.

2000

1900

The South Atlantic Magnetic

Anomaly strength at 500-km altitude has increased significantly

over the last 100 years. In 2000, the

magnetic field was about 35%

weaker in the South Atlantic than

would be expected from a dipole

field. This weakness in the field has

serious implications for low-Earthorbit satellite operations, because

it impacts the radiation dosage at

these altitudes. How much longer

will the South Atlantic Magnetic

Anomaly continue to grow? How

deep will it become? Long-term

satellite observations will allow us

to model the future evolution of

this anomaly.

1980

+15,000 nT –15,000 nT
.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

. 38

Constellation measurements provide a number of advantages over single-satellite

measurements, including improved tracking of external field variability with local time

and latitude, by observing the field simultaneously at a range of local times; improved

observation of the main field and short-period temporal variations; and magnetic gradient measurements for the determination of magnetospheric and ionospheric current

systems and the determination of an accurate external field model.

The density of the constellation is determined by the requirement to be able to separate spatial and temporal variability of the different components of the field, especially variability of the external field. Furthermore, better measurements of the external field components will lead to higher resolution electromagnetic induction studies

of the mid- to deep-mantle and facilitate studies of the relationship between space

weather and the Earth’s atmosphere. High-resolution main field observations will provide an improved determination of core field secular variation.

Measurement requirements and suggested mission phasing are:

• Immediate (1–5 years): Support of analysis of geomagnetic observations from current

satellite missions. A modularized instrument package should be developed to facilitate

taking advantage of missions of opportunity.

• Near term (5–10 years): Constellation of 4–6 satellites at a range of local times in polar orbit at approximately 800-km altitude.

• Long term (10–25 years): Establishment of a more complete, 12-satellite constellation

by adding satellites at lower altitude (300 km) in polar orbits (to enhance study of the

crustal field) and at 800 km in a low-inclination orbit (to enhance recovery of mantle

electrical conductivity). Technological advancements should include the incorporation

of star trackers on magnetometers and improved lifetimes at low altitudes.

4. Variability of Earth’s Gravity Field

Satellite gravity measurements have demonstrated the clear importance of determining the spatial and temporal variability of the Earth’s global gravity field. The first

measurements of spatial and seasonal gravity variability at scales of thousands of kilometers were obtained by laser-tracked geodetic satellites such as LAGEOS I and II.

Seasat and subsequent ocean altimetry satellites provided the first high-resolution satellite-derived gravity field over the oceans and yielded the most complete map yet of

ocean floor bathymetry. There are now three dedicated high-resolution gravity missions — GRACE, CHAMP, and the European Space Agency’s Gravity Field and Steady

State Ocean Circulation Explorer (GOCE) — either in orbit or planned. Each mission

makes use of a different technique for gravity measurement. The 1997 National Research Council report “Satellite Gravity and the Geosphere” outlined in detail the com-
.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

. 39

pelling rationale for temporal measurements of the gravity field to the cryospheric, hydrological, atmospheric, oceanographic, and solid-Earth sciences.

GRACE, a collaboration between NASA and the German space agency, is the first satellite to measure temporal variability of the gravity field on a monthly basis at spatial

scales as short as a few hundred kilometers. Although the strongest signals in the temporal variability of gravity are associated with mass transport in the atmosphere,

oceans, and land hydrological systems, there are a number of measurements relevant

to solid-Earth properties and processes, including lithospheric and mantle structure and

glacial and oceanic loading and unloading of the lithosphere. Careful modeling of atmospheric, oceanic, and hydrological contributions will be necessary to resolve the signature of solid-Earth phenomena, as will calibration and validation with ground measurements. In situ ocean-bottom pressure measurements are also a required component

of a space-based gravity measurement program so that ocean contributions can be

separated from solid-Earth signals. Gravity missions such as GRACE, when combined

with high-resolution radar altimetry missions such as Jason, will allow for the identification of the steric component of sea-level variations and the partitioning of water

storage among continents, oceans, and ice sheets and glaciers. Combined use of timevariable gravity data and ice-mass data (e.g., from ICESat) can help quantify the mantle

Global map of free-air gravity

anomaly from gravity model

EGM96, complete to spherical

harmonic degree and order

360. Lighter shades denote

higher gravity than average;

darker shades, lower gravity

than average. The unit is

milligal, where 1 milligal

(10–5m/s2

) is about one-millionth of the Earth’s average

gravity. The pattern follows

tectonic features and also reflects deeper density anomalies. Any time-variable gravity

signal would be superimposed

on this reference static field.

180 90W 0 90E 180

180 90W 0 90E 180

30N

60N

60S

30S

0

30N

60N

60S

30S

0

–100 100 –50 0 50
.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

. 40

response to past and present glaciation. Because Earth-rotation parameters and gravity

anomaly measurements are both manifestations of mass redistribution, geodetic and

gravity measurements are excellent examples of synergy, allowing a better understanding of global mass transport in the Earth system.

Future gravity missions using laser interferometric or other high-resolution

gradiometry techniques should achieve a sensitivity 100 to 1000 times that of GRACE.

With that sensitivity it will be possible to resolve crustal deformation signals, such as

mass displacement due to undersea lithospheric strain, vertical motions associated with

lithospheric loading and unloading, changes induced by earthquake and volcanic processes, and subsurface aquifer and oil reservoir withdrawal.

Measurement requirements and suggested mission phasing are:

• Immediate (1–5 years): Monthly estimation to within 10 millimeters of surface waterequivalent load at a few hundred kilometers spatial resolution using existing satellites

such as GRACE.

• Near term (5–10 years): GRACE follow-on mission demonstrating satellite-to-satellite

laser interferometry technology.

 • Long term (10–25 years): Gravity measurement improved by 2–3 orders of magnitude

in sensitivity using satellite-to-satellite laser interferometry or spaceborne gradiometer

technology.

5. Imaging Spectroscopy of Earth’s Changing Surface

The Earth’s surface is the interface between the atmosphere, hydrosphere, and the

solid Earth and is the interface of greatest importance to humankind. Imaging spectroscopy (or “hyperspectral” imaging) can resolve the surface attributes and expression of

many of the processes related to natural and human-induced landscape change, volcanism, tectonics, and ice dynamics. Because near-surface materials and their properties often determine a region’s susceptibility to such natural hazards as earthquakes, severe

storms, wildfires, and volcanic activity, characterizing these materials will contribute

significantly to global hazard mapping.

Even in aerial photographs, which represent perhaps the simplest form of remote sensing, it is possible to recognize fire scars, landslides, old ice, and fresh lava. Imaging

spectroscopy, in both the solar-reflected (0.4 to 2.5 μm) and thermal portions (3–5 μm

and 8-12 μm) of the spectrum, raises this science to a new level because it permits the

identification, separation, and measurement of subtle variations reflecting the overlapping molecular absorption and constituent scattering signatures of materials present

on the Earth’s surface. Hundreds of spectral bands are sometimes required to resolve
.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

. 41

and map the large number of materials present on the changing surface. In the face of

the land surface’s complexity, imaging spectroscopy provides a basis for the uniform

compositional measurement of the exposed surface of the solid Earth for both basic

science and hazards research.

As an example, measurements made by AVIRIS (Airborne Visible and InfraRed Imaging

Spectrometer) are serving to define volcanic hazards and to aid in forecasting impending eruptions. AVIRIS data have been used to map subtle changes in near-surface rock

chemistry and, thereby, to identify zones of volcanic-debris-flow susceptibility on the

basis of rock strength inferred from specific mineralogical indicators of hydrothermal

alteration. Debris-flow hazards to downstream communities represent the greatest

volcanic threat for loss of life. Identification of susceptible zones could help to reduce

this risk. Volcanic ash clouds pose a significant aviation hazard, as ash particles can and

have destroyed jet engines. Real-time volcanic plume and ash detection and characterization in both the visible and thermal portions of the spectrum will reduce the risk

posed by this hazard and will contribute significantly to our scientific understanding of

eruptive processes. Identification of outgassed species near vents and craters provides

information on subsurface activity and processes and may ultimately assist in forecasting eruptions. Thermal measurements of land surface temperature, together with simultaneous measurements of the changing emissivity, provide additional critical constraints on magmatic processes and volcanic activity.

(Right) Mt. Etna is one of the

world's most active volcanoes

and has been studied for centuries from the ground. This

ASTER image was acquired during a recent eruption (July 29,

2001) and shows the sulfur dioxide plume (in purple) originating from the summit, drifting

over the city of Catania, and

continuing over the Ionian Sea.

ASTER’s unique combination of

multiple thermal infrared channels and high spatial resolution

allows the determination of the

thickness and position of the

SO2 plume. The image covers an

area of 24 x 30 km.

(Left) Mount Rainier, Washington, AVIRIS image cube. The top

and right panel show the spectra from 400 to 2500 nm for the

edge elements. The face panel

(10 x 20 km) shows aspects of

the composition of the surface,

including frozen snow and ice

(light blue), melting snow (dark

blue), vegetation (green) and

exposed rock and soil (redbrown). The AVIRIS spectra of

this data set have been used to

measure the snow and ice composition and melting status. The

exposed rock composition and

alteration has been determined

for volcanic collapse hazard

assessment.
.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

. 42

In arid environments, dust storms, sand storms, and migrating dunes pose hazards that

can be effectively tracked via imaging spectroscopy. Although toxic chemicals can occur

naturally, they can pose a hazard extending far beyond their source, if the weathering

products become airborne, as is common in arid regions. For example, Owens Valley in

eastern California is now recognized as the most significant source of toxic alkali dust

in the western U.S. Understanding the spatial distribution of sources of naturally occurring toxins, the spread of contaminants from these source areas, and the correlation of

contaminant distribution events with atmospheric winds and soil moisture (which controls susceptibility to wind shear) is possible through imaging spectroscopy.

By combining determination of soil composition and moisture from imaging spectroscopy with other measurements, such as high-resolution topography and precipitation,

we may be able to achieve real-time prediction of short-term surface-change events

such as landsliding. Liquid water absorption in highly susceptible super-saturated soils,

as well as seasonal, fire-induced, or human-induced changes in vegetation and related

soil strength, are key determinants of landslide susceptibility that can be revealed via

spectroscopy. In order to quantify snow accumulation, snowmelt, and surface runoff

where winter snows persist, simultaneous, real-time measurement via imaging spectroscopy of the three phases of water in melting snow and ice provides an otherwise

unattainable window on the causative factors of major spring floods. Frequent observations from space are required for such transient situations.

The measurement of subtle differences in the mineralogy of surface rock and soil units

serve to delineate the surface expression of earthquake faults. These same types of

measurements can identify those naturally occurring minerals that acidify water and

mobilize toxic heavy metals in water sources. Many materials in nature are harmful to

man and often occur near population centers. The molecular absorption of a range of

asbestos minerals, for instance, has been measured with AVIRIS in both natural and human-altered environments. For asbestos and other spectrally unique materials, spatial

concentrations of less than one percent of a pixel can be resolved. The key characteristics required to enable such results are a high signal-to-noise ratio, stability of the

instrument’s radiometric and spectral calibration, and orthogonal spatial and spectral

characteristics (such that all wavelengths for a given spectrum come from the same

area on the surface).

In the solar-reflected spectrum, imaging spectroscopy of the solid Earth from space has

taken an important first step with the Hyperion technology-demonstration sensor on

the New Millennium Program Earth Observing (EO-1) spacecraft. Although Hyperion

has a signal-to-noise ratio about one-fifth that of airborne AVIRIS, the success of its imaging capabilities and analysis of its limitations will aid the development of the nextgeneration spaceborne imaging spectrometers.
.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

. 43

The thermal portion of the spectrum includes important spectral signatures for Earthsurface materials. In addition to silicate mineralogy, changes in biota, soil water saturation, volcanic gas composition, and temperature can be discerned with appropriate

spectroscopic measurements. Multispectral thermal-infrared measurements are being

acquired by ASTER on the Terra platform. To address the challenges for solid-Earth science and hazards research with observations over this portion of the spectrum, substantially improved spectral sampling and high precision are required.

Acquisition of high-spatial-resolution panchromatic imagery in conjunction with imaging spectroscopy measurements will support the ability to measure and monitor smallscale surface displacements in a manner complementary to InSAR observations. Significant improvements in accuracy over what can be achieved with current NASA imagery

require resolutions of 1–5 m/pixel.

The power of imaging spectroscopy is the ability for one technique to provide key data

to solve a variety of problems, both within and outside of solid-Earth science. These

data include ones that are relatively long lasting, such as images of zones of hydrothermally altered rocks or fault zones, and ones that are rapidly changing, such as measurements of soil saturation or airborne dust clouds. High spatial resolution is needed to

delineate the persistent, but spatially complex, features of the Earth’s surface, whereas

high temporal resolution is required to predict, track, and mitigate most natural hazards. As the field advances and problems become more specific, imaging spectroscopy

missions must evolve to meet the diverse requirements of a broad variety of scientific

targets. NASA has guided the technique from the laboratory to airborne experiments

and finally to space. Future spaceborne missions should focus on meeting science-specific requirements for signal-to-noise ratio, spectral and spatial resolution, and temporal sampling.

Much of the solar reflected, midwave infrared, and thermal infrared portions of the electromagnetic spectrum are transmitted

through the atmosphere. Separating the molecular absorption and

constituent scattering signatures in

the spectra of surface rock and soil

minerals, illustrated here for four

common minerals, permits surface

composition information to be recovered from high-resolution imaging spectroscopy.

1.0

0

0.9

0.8

0.7

0.6

0.5

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

0.0

Reflectance

2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000

Wavelength (nm)

0.8

1.0

0.4

0.6

0.0

0.2

Transmittance

Atmospheric Transmittance

Silicate Mineral

Hydroxyl Mineral

Iron Oxide Mineral

Sulfate Mineral
.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

. 44

To address the challenges for solid-Earth science, measurement requirements and suggested mission phasing are:

• Immediate (1–5 years): Continued spaceborne and airborne imaging in the solar-reflected portion of the spectrum. An airborne capability in the thermal portion of the

spectrum (3–5 μm and 8–12 μm with 30-nm spectral sampling) should be developed.

• Near term (5–10 years): An improved-precision solar-reflected spaceborne imaging

spectrometer with a 100-km swath and 30-m spatial resolution. A high-spatial-resolution panchromatic capability should be included. A thermal imaging spectrometer

(3–5 μm and 8–12 μm with 30-nm spectral sampling) having high signal-to-noise ratio,

good calibration stability, and spectral–spatial orthogonality should be flown as a

space demonstration project.

• Long term (10–25 years): Continuous spaceborne, wide-swath, full-spectrum, highperformance imaging spectroscopy. There should be a nested narrow-swath, high-spatial-resolution, full-spectrum capability to target transient events.

6. Space Geodetic Networks and the International Terrestrial Reference Frame

In cooperation with many international partners, NASA’s Solid Earth Science Program

plays a key role in establishing, maintaining, and operating global geodetic networks.

Currently the networks include SLR, VLBI, and the GPS ground system. Relevant data

products and valuable services are provided to the worldwide research community

through the International Laser Ranging Service, the International VLBI Service, and the

International GPS Service, respectively. Precise 3-D crustal motions are determined by

all three networks, with dense GPS arrays particularly useful for regional tectonic and

earthquake cycle studies. Beyond their scientific value, these data, together with precise determination of the 3-D geocenter motion by SLR and GPS, constitute the geodetic elements that define the International Terrestrial Reference Frame (ITRF), which is

the basis for all geodetic measurements described in this report. The ITRF is geometrically connected to the Celestial Reference Frame via Earth Orientation Parameter (EOP)

time series, which are determined primarily by the VLBI technique and contain a wealth

of geophysical and climatic information. The ITRF and EOP, and hence the networks,

should continue to be maintained and improved and their data routinely acquired at

the best possible accuracy and temporal resolution.

7. Promising Techniques and Observations

A number of other promising observations that are either developing or expanding

into the field of solid-Earth science offer additional methods to achieve the goals of

the Solid Earth Science Program.
.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

. 45

Seismology from Space

The SESWG is intrigued by the possibility of seismic imaging from space. Spaceborne

seismology is a logical extension of spaceborne surface-change detection by SAR, radar, and GPS. The Southern California Integrated GPS Network (SCIGN) has observed

near-field strain-wave propagation from the 1999 Hector Mine earthquake. It is likely

that a continuously observing spaceborne system could image the occurrence of “silent” or “slow” earthquakes as well as the propagation of ground displacement by surface waves at scales of continents. The required technology, such as 30-m lightweight

antennas, warrants early investment, and the specific data requirements for imaging

from geosynchronous orbit should be defined. Another approach would be to use the

ionosphere as a proxy for surface motion. It has been known for decades that the ionosphere responds to vertical motions of the Earth’s surface with an amplification of the

vertical surface displacement on the order of ten thousand, although very limited in

frequency content. Whether ionospheric tomography from GPS limb sounding and

ground GPS networks, along with magnetic constellations, could image these surfacewave-induced ionospheric gravity waves should be explored.

Propagation of seismic waves

from the deep, magnitude

8.2 Bolivia earthquake of

June 9, 1994. The earthquake

was so large that it produced

a permanent displacement of

the surface of the Earth of

several millimeters near the

epicenter in Bolivia.

The Solid Earth Beneath the Oceans

Over 70% of the solid Earth lies beneath the oceans, and many geologic processes of

global significance occur on and beneath the ocean basins and margins. Some of these

processes have analogues on land, but others are quite distinct. For example, at more

than 50,000 km in length, the global mid-ocean ridge system is the dominant contributor to volcanic activity at the Earth’s solid surface. Mid-ocean ridges are the locus as

well of pervasive hydrothermal systems that host unique biological communities not

found at terrestrial volcanoes. Subduction zones, where great faults mark the sites of
.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

. 46

convergence between two tectonic plates, are found almost exclusively beneath the

seafloor. Tsunamis, with their frequently devastating effects at coastal regions, originate by motion at the Earth–ocean interface.

Spaceborne observations have made significant contributions to the study of the solid

Earth beneath the oceans. This generalization has been especially true in geodesy and

seafloor mapping. Space geodetic techniques based on GPS combined with precise

(centimeter-level) acoustic ranging provide the only means to place deep ocean benchmarks in an absolute reference frame, and hence integrate seafloor plate motions into

the terrestrial (e.g., VLBI) deformation field. Satellite altimetry has been used to infer

seafloor bathymetry from linear inversion of the global gravity field. While the resulting product has lower spatial resolution than can be achieved with shipborne swathmapping systems, it has provided the first global view of the shape of the ocean floor

and the first comprehensive coverage in the remote southern oceans.

Future satellite missions will extend observations of the solid Earth beneath the oceans

to smaller spatial scales and will enhance global understanding of temporal variability.

For example, high-accuracy gravity measurements from GRACE follow-on missions

might be capable of observing intermediate-wavelength gravity anomalies generated

by the accumulation of strain at locked convergent margins. Making such measurements in situ is costly and dependent on the serendipitous concurrence of seafloor instrumentation with tectonic activity. Although some solid-Earth missions will have limited application to submarine processes, NASA should be watchful for future opportunities to ensure that spaceborne measurements are utilized to their full capacity.

Over the coming two and a half decades, the biological, chemical, and geological

oceanography communities will increasingly focus on understanding episodic oceanic

processes through the use of seafloor observatories. These will of necessity focus on

the intensive study of relatively small regions, ranging from the scale of a mid-ocean

ridge vent field up to that of the smallest (e.g., Juan de Fuca) tectonic plate.

Spaceborne measurements that resolve temporal changes in the solid Earth beneath

the seafloor will provide an essential global dimension to seafloor observatory efforts

and should be coordinated with planned and future ocean observatory programs.

Subsurface Imaging

Spaceborne subsurface imaging was first demonstrated in radar images from the

Spaceborne Imaging Radar (SIR-A and SIR-B) missions, from which sub-Saharan drainage channels were identified beneath desert sands. Applications of this capability

range from the estimation of ice cap thicknesses to the determination of subsurface

properties such as geological structure, lithology, and soil moisture. Radar subsurface

imaging combined with hyperspectral imaging could prove extremely valuable for remotely mapping shallow subsurface characteristics that would make a region more vul-
.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

. 47

nerable to natural hazards. For example, the capability to recognize areas of soft sediment or high moisture content could help delineate regions prone to strong shaking or

possible liquefaction during earthquakes. Liquefaction effects after earthquakes have

already been observed remotely in visual bands. Presently VHF or UHF sounding or

SAR is the technology most often chosen as the means to achieve subsurface imaging.

Advanced processing methods, improved hardware, airborne trials, and ground-truth

procedures will need to be developed to capitalize on the promising potential that this

approach offers for both basic and applied research.

Numerical models of the

geodynamo are now capable

of reproducing many details of

the geometry of the Earth's

magnetic field. Shown is a

cross section of a model for

the axisymmetric part of the

magnetic field through the

Earth's core along the rotation

axis. The white innermost region is the inner core, the light

gray region is the outer core,

and the thin dark-gray region

is the lowermost part of the

mantle. The left half of the image depicts the strength of the

toroidal (east-west) part of the

field, which is directed eastward in one hemisphere and

westward in the other. The

right half shows field lines of

the poloidal part of the field,

which displays a nearly dipolar

structure. The dynamo maintains the Earth's magnetic field

by converting poloidal field

into toroidal field, and then

converting toroidal field back

into poloidal field.

Research and Analysis

Data analysis is an essential part of every NASA space mission. Not only are NASA

data of greatest benefit when integrated with quantitative models, but the research

leads to new ideas for how Earth processes operate, new ways of making measurements from space, and new concepts for missions. The solid-Earth system is inherently

complex, and understanding it requires significant effort in the analysis of data and

their comparison with models. Simulations must be carried out concurrently with data

analysis so that the entire system can be studied and understood. Observational data

can also be assimilated into computational models providing constraints on and verification of hypotheses.

A few examples of critical research and analysis programs for solid-Earth science at

NASA include the following:

• Models of crustal deformation that incorporate InSAR and GPS measurements of surface deformation. The models for plate boundary zones should include the pre-, co-,

and postseismic phases of the seismic cycle. Models must be developed for the many

other sources of surface deformation including those associated with volcanic eruptions, water withdrawal, and loading and unloading by water and ice.
.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

. 48

• Models of landform evolution that account for time-dependent topography.

The models should include the tectonic growth of topography as well as erosional

processes.

• Models of time-dependent surface gravity. The models should account for tectonic,

hydrological, surface loading and unloading, and mantle dynamical effects.

• Models of the Earth’s magnetic field that account for observations.

Many solid-Earth science processes are associated with self-organizing complex systems and span time scales from seconds to tens of millions of years. A characteristic of

these systems is that they satisfy self-similar, power-law statistics. Because this selfsimilarity extends over wide ranges of temporal and spatial scales, renormalizationgroup approaches are often required. These systems are generally chaotic, so they are

statistical and intrinsically unpredictable. Examples include mantle convection, the

outer core flow responsible for generating the Earth’s magnetic field, the deformation

of the Earth’s crust responsible for earthquakes, and the evolution of land drainage

systems.

A number of natural hazards fall into this class of phenomena, including earthquakes,

landslides, and forest and wild fires. Each of these natural hazards is characterized by a

power-law distribution of severe “events.” In order to explain this behavior, statistical

physicists have introduced a number of simple cellular-automata models that yield

power-law distributions of “avalanches.” Three of these models can be directly associated with natural hazards: the slider-block model with earthquakes, the sandpile

model with landslides, and the forest-fire model with large fires. The use of these models can provide a rationale for understanding and integrating a wide range of observational data on these systems.

Information Systems

1. Modeling and Computational Priorities

The broad range of spatial and temporal scales manifested by solid-Earth processes

calls for a variety of modeling and data assimilation techniques. Advances in inversion

methods, three-dimensional modeling, data assimilation, statistical analysis, and pattern recognition are all necessary for understanding these complex systems. High-performance computers are required for carrying out these approaches.

One of the major problems facing scientists today is that the scientific data volumes

are increasing at a faster rate than computational power, challenging both the analysis

and the modeling of observations. Resources must be put into improved algorithms to
.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

. 49

simplify processing and to approximate complex phenomena to allow researchers to

handle the large volumes of data as well as to find the dominant physics in a given

data set. Another promising approach to handling large data volumes is to use pattern

recognition to focus attention and point out subtle features in the data.

Because of the complexity of the solid-Earth system, high-performance computers are

required for scientific progress. Computations of the systems being studied, from the

geodynamo to interacting fault systems, take weeks to years to run on even the most

capable of current workstations, making supercomputers the only means of modeling

the systems. It is crucial to utilize the latest computational advances to make modeling

an effective tool.

For example, numerical modeling of the geodynamo places extraordinary demands on

currently available computational resources. Recent calculations have consumed

39°

38°

37°

36°

35°

34°

33°

32°

–4 –3 –2 –1 0

237° 238° 239° 240° 241° 242° 243° 244° 245°

It is very difficult to forecast an

earthquake. Yet advances in modeling and computational simulation

methods, combined with increasing

computational power, have suggested several methods for finding

precursory space-time patterns hidden in existing data sets. One example is shown at left, where the

colored anomalies are spots where

future large earthquakes are likely

to occur according to the analysis.

More research is needed to quantify

how well we can localize these occurrences in time. The red arrows

point to four earthquakes of magnitude 5 or greater that have occurred

since the forecast plot was made:

the northernmost is the magnitude

5.2 Watsonville event that occurred

on May 13, 2002; the middle earthquakes are the 5.1 February 10,

2001, Big Bear event, and farther

south, the 5.1 October 31, 2001,

Anza event; the southernmost is the

5.1 February 22, 2002, Baja California event. If the occurrence of moderate to large earthquakes were

governed by statistical laws characterized by a uniform probability distribution in the space of seismically

active crustal areas, then the probability that all four events fall within

11 km (the spatial resolution) of a

colored anomaly can be computed

to be about P~.001.

San Francisco

Los Angeles

San Diego
.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

. 50

months to years of CPU time on supercomputers. Yet these numerical models operate

far from the parameter regime of the Earth. There is the potential for great progress

when computational resources reach the stage where data assimilation and sensitivity

analysis become feasible. However, to achieve this goal will demand an entirely new

approach to the provision of computational resources in the solid-Earth sciences, most

likely with massive computational grids being made available.

A three-dimensional finite

element grid for modeling

mantle flow and crustal deformation along a subduction zone. Such modeling

techniques are extremely

computationally intensive.

2. Distributed Receiving and Processing Systems

An important aspect of data collection is to create distributed centers for processing

and storing unique data sets. Developing the infrastructure to compare and use

complementary data sets, such as ice topography and sea-level changes, opens the

door to interdisciplinary research. It is also important to create the infrastructure to access other non-NASA datasets such as seismic and geologic data. These supporting

data sets are critical for modeling and understanding the complete system. These distributed data centers are particularly important in the event of natural disasters, when

not only can they support disaster management but they also enable real-time scientific experiments dependent on time-sensitive observations. Such centers will become

more important as multiple data types are fused into integrated models. Characteristics

of a system of centers should include distributed data at thousands of sites, each with

data volumes of 1 TB–1 PB; multitier architecture for staging of the data; middleware

to control integrity and versioning; support standards developed within the community; and high-performance user access of 100-GB files from 40-TB data sets within 5

minutes and program-to-program communication in milliseconds using staging,

streaming, and advanced cache replication.

N

S W

E

2890

670

0
.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

. 51

Technology Development

The ambitious research agenda of the solid-Earth community will provide unprecedented levels of highly accurate data. To achieve the accuracies and the spatial and

temporal resolution needed to answer the highest-priority questions about the solid

Earth, however, will require new advanced spaceborne technologies. Several promising

technologies lie just beyond current capabilities. Systematic development of technologies through the Earth Science Technology Office (ESTO), Advanced Component Technology Program (ACT), the Instrument Incubator Program (IIP), and the New Millennium Program (NMP) will help reduce the risk, development time, and cost of the target missions.

The new technologies that will result in the highest science payoff are summarized in

the illustration below. Other enabling technologies will be identified in coming years,

but the figure serves to show the importance of investing in technology to meet the

requirements for future science return.

An early investment in

technologies will enable

critical future observations.

Observations

Regional surface

deformation maps

(Envisat)

Global gravity mapping

at low-res (GRACE,

GOCE, CHAMP)

Narrow-swath

imaging spectroscopy

(Hyperion)

Weekly surface deformation

maps (LEO InSAR)

Magnetometer constellation

(4-6 satellites, inc. at low orbits)

Daily surface deformation

maps (LEO, InSAR wide-swath

constellation)

Global gravity mapping with

tens of km resolution

Hourly to continuous surface

deformation maps (GEO or

constellation InSAR)

Continental-scale

seismic wave propagation

Global gravity mapping with 

few-km resolution

Magnetometer constellation

(12 satellites)

Wide-swath imaging spectroscopy Ionospheric tomography

High S/N ratio

imaging spectroscopy

Technologies

Immediate

1–5 years

Near Term

5–10 years

Long Term

10–15 years
.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

. 52

Supporting Framework

1. Maintenance of Global Geodetic Networks, Terrestrial Reference Frame, and

Earth Orientation Parameters

The accuracy of global geodetic networks advances by about a factor 10 per decade,

with submillimeter-scale reference-frame accuracy likely in the near future. Continued

improvements in accuracy are critical to a number of the recommendations of this report, from the study of sea-level change and improved gravity-field measurements to

the detection and characterization of land

surface change. The Internet and

high-speed computing have recently been harnessed to provide near-real-time global GPS

positioning and time transfer,

of significant potential benefit to onboard satellite and

airborne data reduction and

natural hazards disaster management. For example, repeatpass airborne InSAR is now

possible given subdecimeter

global navigation, a capability

that can lead to real-time measurements of volcanic inflation and crustal deformation from an airborne platform. Temporal changes in the gravity field and their

links to Earth-orientation parameters are also an important focus of ongoing research.

For instance, recent increases in the equatorial oblateness of the geoid may signal the

migration of water from polar regions toward the equatorial seas.

Although initiated by NASA’s Crustal Dynamics Program to measure crustal deformation and changes in Earth’s angular momentum, the global geodetic networks now

provide critical data products and valuable services to a multitude of scientific, government, commercial, and military users well outside the solid-Earth science community

through the International GPS Service, the International Laser Ranging Service, and the

International VLBI Service. A significant challenge for NASA is to identify a mechanism

by which the support for these vital resources can be shared by all users within the

agency, so that NASA’s Solid Earth Science Program can turn its attention to the development and implementation of the strategic recommendations of this report.

The Global Positioning

System constellation is used

for measuring surface position changes to millimeter

accuracy. Applications range

from plate tectonic velocity

measurements to searchand-rescue operations in remote locations. GPS is a critical part of the supporting

framework for solid-Earth

science research but plays a

dual role as an operational

network relied upon by a

broad range of military and

civilian parties.
.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

. 53

2. Precise Orbit Determination (POD)

As is well-recognized by its international partners, NASA’s Solid Earth Science Program

supports the development, maintenance, and continuing refinement and enhancement

of computer software for modeling and computing satellite orbits. This precise orbit

determination (POD) capability is essential for the global space geodesy enterprise.

Satellite-based geodetic techniques, such as SLR, GPS (including occultation and reflection experiments), microwave and laser altimetry, lidar, and SAR/InSAR all require continuous POD to accuracies within a decimeter to centimeter and better. These data also

feed into the maintenance of the ITRF. Furthermore, the POD information constitutes

primary data for solution of the Earth’s gravity field. Single-satellite POD over the past

four decades and recent spaceborne GPS satellite-to-satellite tracking have led to generations of steadily improving Earth gravity models used as a reference for a variety of

civil, military, and research applications. POD is also a stringent requirement for planetary flights, space missions testing relativistic effects, and space VLBI. Relative POD

from inter-satellite tracking (e.g., GRACE) provides improved measurement sensitivity

and spatial resolution. Development of a “drag-free” system using onboard proof-mass

technology will further POD and modeling capabilities.

GPS observations have documented that

deformation across the Cacadia subduction

zone in the Pacific northwest is governed

by two processes acting on very different

time scales.

Top: Change in relative east-west position

between two GPS stations in British Columbia, one (Victoria) near the plate boundary

marking the eastward subduction of the

Juan de Fuca plate, and the other (Penticton) well inland on the stable North

American plate.The long linear episodes

of shortening (red lines) are interrupted at

intervals of approximately 14 months by

transients of opposite sign.The transients

last 1–2 weeks and produce surface displacements of up to 5 mm.

The average

rate of shortening, the superposition of

the two styles of deformation, is shown

by the green line.

(Bottom) This deformation pattern has been

modeled as the result of depth-dependent

slip behavior along the interface between

the two plates. The long-term shortening

is attributed to the steady accumulation of

stress across a shallow, locked portion of

the subduction interface that lies off-shore.

That stress appears to be released episodically by large thrust earthquakes at intervals

of several centuries.The transient displacements are attributed to more frequent “

silent earthquakes,” episodes of slow slip

that relieve stress along a deeper section

of the plate interface but generate no seismic waves. The reason for the near periodicity of these transients is not known.

Future

space-based observations coupled with

simulations involving models similar to

that shown will aid in elucidating the underlying mechanics.

25

15

5

–5

Relative Position (mm)

1997 1998 1999 2000 2001

Trench

Victoria, B.C.

East Component

Victoria, B.C.

N. American Plate

Accretionary Prism

Juan de Fuca Plate

Locked

Transition

Slip

Z

Cross section viewed from south
.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

3. Coordination, Validation, and Calibration

While space-based measurements are inherently global in coverage, in many instances

they are limited in their temporal or spatial sensitivity. For example, the spatial resolution of quantities derived from potential field measurements or their gradients will always be limited by the distance of a satellite from Earth’s surface. The repeat times of

satellites are often too long to resolve temporal variability at periods of hours to days,

a problem that is worsened as orbit height is increased, e.g., in an effort to increase

mission longevity.

In many instances, gaps in spatial and temporal coverage can be filled by utilizing

other measurement platforms. Fine spatial resolution is often best achieved with land

or seafloor arrays installed either semi-permanently or on a campaign basis. These arrays are typically focused on specific geologic features, e.g., the networks of seismic

and GPS instruments along the San Andreas fault. Airborne SAR or imaging spectroscopy can provide smaller spatial and shorter temporal resolution of local features of

special interest such as active volcanoes. Projects such as the Airborne Synthetic Aperture Radar (AIRSAR), AVIRIS, and the private industry GEOSAR illustrate the importance

of airborne data collection. An important role for airborne programs is as technology

testbeds for future radar techniques. Coordination of these efforts with space-based

missions will yield a scientific return that exceeds the contribution from each measurement type and should be actively encouraged.

54

This three-dimensional perspective

view of the volcanic island of

Manam, Papua, New Guinea, was

obtained by AIRSAR operated in its

topographic mode. The volcano,

one of the most active in the Pacific “Ring of Fire,” was in the

midst of a large eruption when this

image was acquired. Lava flows

and hot clouds of rock, ash, and

gas known as pyroclastic flows are

emitted from craters at the summit

of the volcano and race down the

valleys. Deposits from earlier

flows appear orange and blue;

forested slopes of the volcano

appear in pink.

The atmosphere and oceans are a prominent source of signal for some space-based

measurements. Examples include temporal gravity variations to be measured by

GRACE and its follow-on missions or Earth rotation measurements to be made by future altimetric missions. Correction, validation, and calibration of these space-based

observations will require in situ measurement of atmospheric and oceanic quantities

before these data can be used to address solid Earth problems. Terrestrial-referenceframe measurements assist in separating out such signals. Removing the atmospheric

and oceanic signals requires accurate models of the general circulation of the atmo-
.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

. 55

sphere and ocean combined with assimilated global in situ measurements. Calibration

and validation of GRACE-like missions requires the contemporaneous measurement of

fluctuations of seafloor pressure. In the past, these supporting measurements have

often been neglected or eliminated to accommodate budget shortfalls. Lack of such

supporting data, however, reduces confidence in space-based measurements and in

some instances can lead to incorrect inferences due to inherent measurement inaccuracy. Greater attention to validation and calibration is urged for all future mission

planning.

Education

The discoveries and new knowledge gained from over 40 years of Earth remote sensing conducted by NASA have revolutionized our understanding of how the Earth functions as a system. This growing understanding is increasingly needed to inform political and economic decisions of local, national, and global impact.

The solid-Earth perspectives on life on a restless planet highlighted by this report offer

exciting and engaging possibilities for education. To capitalize on these opportunities,

the Solid Earth Science Program will collaborate with the NASA Earth Science Enterprise Education Program to stimulate broad public interest, appreciation, and understanding of Earth’s interrelated systems, and encourage young scholars to consider careers in science and technology.

The Solid Earth Science Education Program (SESEP) will develop educational activities

based on the three objectives identified by the ESE: informal education, formal education, and a work-force initiative in Earth Science Applications.

Informal education is considered an “out-of-classroom” educational opportunity such

as those found in museums, science and technology centers, and similar nonprofit

education organizations that provide significant educational activities for learners of

all ages. Planned program components in this area include contributing new solidEarth content and playing a consultative role for current and future development of

exhibits, displays, and other non-classroom activities. For example, the California Science Center noticed that children’s attendance in their Plate Tectonics area was down,

likely because of a lack of appreciation among children (and probably their parents)

that plate tectonics affects their lives. SESEP’s remedy will be to develop hands-on activities to show the connection between plate tectonics and earthquakes and to create

an enjoyable family learning experience. For existing NASA center partners, such as

the interactive museum The Dynamic Earth, SESEP will arrange guest lecturers during

Family Science nights and coordinate participatory demonstrations of topics such as

earthquake simulation. SESEP will contribute to the NASA Earth Science Enterprise

Museum Support workshops and conferences targeting the needs of informal educa-
.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

. 56

tors across the country. SESEP will also assist in the development of solid-Earth aspects

of educational overviews and foster working relationships across the informal education network.

Formal education includes traditional classroom education from kindergarten through

12th grade, as well as undergraduate and graduate university programs. SESEP will support existing NASA and partner programs, such as the Global Learning and Observations to Benefit the Environment (GLOBE) program (field studies for students using GPS

measurements), with the development of new resource materials for classroom teachers. SESEP will identify and supplement efforts for undergraduate and graduate research opportunities through NASA centers, universities having Memoranda of Understanding (MOUs) with NASA, and existing university programs that support solid-Earth

education and research.

Students make measurements

of hidden magnets beneath a

blue cloth in an analogy to

the method GRACE uses to

measure the gravity field of

mass distributions in the

Earth. Educational programs

such as these are crucial in

engaging the public in shaping and sharing NASA’s experience in exploration and discovery and in appreciating

how advances in solid-Earth

science contributes to

people’s daily lives.

The Work Force Initiative in Earth Science Applications is a professional work-force development program aimed at identifying and addressing requirements for enhancing

job skills in Earth science and technology fields. SESEP will establish a contact list of

undergraduate and graduate students who are involved in solid-Earth science and are

interested in participating in research programs. This list will be shared within NASA

and with other government and private organizations that may have future opportunities for the students. SESEP partners and scientists will speak at specific engagements and professional conferences aimed toward industry to raise awareness of ongoing solid-Earth science efforts and to expand participation.

The Solid Earth Science Education Program is designed to exert a current, progressive,

and informative influence that fulfills NASA’s ESE objectives and leverages other ESE

initiatives. SESEP will be an important element of NASA’s contribution to the national

socio-economic and educational agenda and will promote synergy among NASA and

non-NASA activities while establishing its unique role and contributions to furthering

solid-Earth education.
.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Summary

57

Earth science as a discipline now recognizes the dynamic, interconnected nature of the

Earth as a system. Each component — oceans, atmosphere, biosphere, and solid Earth

— interacts with the others in ways only partially understood and over a broad range

of time scales. The solid Earth is a dynamic and essential component of the Earth system. From the motions in the core that generate the Earth’s magnetic field, through

mantle convection, plate tectonics, volcanic eruptions, and land surface evolution, the

solid Earth is always changing.

A primary goal of solid-Earth science is the assessment and mitigation of natural hazards that seriously threaten health, safety, national security, and economic viability.

Space-based data acquired by NASA and other cooperating Federal agencies contribute

heavily to our understanding and forecasting of volcanic eruptions, sea-level rise,

floods, landslides, earthquakes, and other hazards. The 25-year vision of the Solid

Earth Science Working Group (SESWG) is to understand natural and perturbed systems

well enough to predict outcomes, consequences, and impacts.

Understanding the discrete events that shape the Earth, and from them building a

complete picture of our planet’s dynamics, requires views of the governing behavior at

local, regional, and global scales. For many scientific issues, satellite-based observations are the primary practical means to obtain an adequate density of coverage. Integrating the complementary and often more intensive, local ground-based measurements into comprehensive predictive models requires a new generation of satellite

measurements at temporal and spatial resolutions substantially superior to those made

in the past.

Six broad scientific challenges have been identified as the highest in priority for NASA’s

Solid Earth Science Program for the next 25 years. These challenges are of fundamental

scientific importance, have strong implications for society, are amenable to substantial

progress through a concerted series of scientific observations from space, and build

naturally on directions identified in the NASA Earth Science Enterprise Strategic Plan.

The six science challenges are

• What is the nature of deformation at plate boundaries and what are the implications

for earthquake hazards?

• How do tectonics and climate interact to shape the Earth’s surface and create natural

hazards?

• What are the interactions among ice masses, oceans, and the solid Earth and their implications for sea-level change?

• How do magmatic systems evolve and under what conditions do volcanoes erupt?

• What are the dynamics of the mantle and crust and how does the Earth’s surface

respond?
.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

• What are the dynamics of the Earth’s magnetic field and its interactions with the

Earth system?

These six challenges are guiding themes that should define the research objectives for

solid-Earth science within NASA for the next two and a half decades. Each challenge,

once met, offers a series of significant expected accomplishments and clear benefits to

the nation. On the basis of current knowledge, the next steps needed to address each

challenge can be readily defined.

The six scientific challenges are also extremely ambitious and address goals common to

the entire solid-Earth science community. Success in meeting these challenges will depend on the close coordination and collaboration with other NASA programs, with

other federal agencies, and with international partners.

To make substantial progress toward answering each of the six challenges, NASA must

formulate a broadly conceived program with both near-term goals and clear steps toward longer-term objectives. A fully realized program contains elements that encompass not only new observations, but also sustained investment in research and analysis, information systems, new technologies, supporting infrastructure, and education.

While NASA’s role in observations is primarily the development of satellite missions,

such projects cannot be their most effective without complementary terrestrial observations and the requisite partnerships with other programs and agencies. A dedicated

research and analysis program is critical to insure that newly acquired data are fully

analyzed, to provide the new ideas for instrument and mission development, and to

foster unexpected scientific discoveries. This effort should include significant investments in computation and modeling for testing theories and predictions. A number of

observations needed over the next two decades require a continuing investment in

advanced technology development. A modular yet broadly interlinked program architecture offers flexibility to change as scientific discoveries and programmatic requirements dictate.

The recommended plan for new observations from space to meet the scientific challenges for solid-Earth science builds on current capabilities and on data from missions

and instruments that have recently flown, are currently flying, or are planned for the

very near future. It also relies on data from missions currently supported by other scientific disciplines within NASA, and it leverages collaborations with federal, private,

and international partners.

The plan is cast in terms of five observational campaigns or strategies, each of which

addresses multiple scientific challenges. These strategies include

• deformation of the land surface,

• high-resolution topography and topographic change, 58
.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

• variability of the Earth’s magnetic field,

• variability of the Earth’s gravity field, and

• imaging spectroscopy of Earth’s changing surface.

Specific recommendations for each strategy are divided by time horizon among the immediate time frame (1–5 years), the near term (5–10 years), and the long term (10–25

years). Supporting strategies are offered for space geodetic networks and the International Terrestrial Reference Frame, as well as for several promising directions where

substantial technology development will be required.

The elements of these observational strategies, broken down by time frame, are illustrated in the table on page 60. The potential impact of each strategy on each of the six

scientific challenges is also indicated.

In the next 5 years, the new space mission of highest priority for solid-Earth science is

a satellite dedicated to Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) measurements of the land surface at L-band. Such a mission would address the most urgent objectives in the areas of plate-boundary deformation, land-surface evolution, ice and

sea-level change, volcanism, and mantle dynamics.

Over the next 5–10 years, the scientific challenges facing solid-Earth science can be met

by NASA leading or partnering in the flight of space missions involving constellations

of satellites dedicated to InSAR and magnetic field measurements, new-generation instruments for mapping global topography and its temporal changes and for carrying 59

A dedicated InSAR satellite is

the highest-priority objective

for solid-Earth science at NASA

in the next 5 years.
.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Surface

deformation

Timeline

Observational

Strategies

Ice and Ocean Dynamics

Immediate

(1–5 Years)

Single dedicated InSAR satellite

• L-band, left/right looking

capability, and weekly access to

anywhere on the globe

• Precise orbit determination and

ionospheric correction capabilities

• 1 mm/yr surface displacement over

50-km horizontal extents in

selected areas

Constellation of InSAR satellites

• Improved temporal frequency of

deformation maps to daily intervals

• Maps at several-hundred-km width

with full vector surface displace

ments at accuracies of submillimeter per year over 10-km spatial

extents and 1-m spatial resolution

• Complementary ground and

seafloor geodetic observations

Constellation of InSAR satellites in

low-Earth or geosynchronous orbits

• Hourly global access

• Increased density of continuous

ground and seafloor geodetic

observations

Plate BoundariesLand Surface ChangeMagmatic Processes

Mantle DynamicsMagnetic Field

Global mapping to supercede the

SRTM data set

• One-time global mapping at 2- to

5-m resolution and 0.5-m vertical

accuracy for the ground surface

• Ice-sheet mapping with 1-km

horizontal resolution, 1-cm vertical

accuracy for the ice or snow surface,

and a repeat interval of months

(for annual changes) to years (for

long-term changes)

Continuously operating, targeted,

high-resolution topographic mapping

and change-detection capability

• Targeted local to regional mapping,

with global access, at 1-m

resolution, 0.1-m vertical accuracy

for the ground and water surfaces

• Repeat frequency of hours to years

depending on the rate of

topographic change

Complete, 12-satellite constellation

• Adding satellites at lower altitude

(300 km) in polar orbit (to enhance

study of the crustal field)

• At 800 km in a low-inclination orbit

(to enhance recovery of mantle

electrical conductivity)

• Technological advancements on

incorporating star trackers on

magnetometers and improved

lifetimes at low altitudes

Gravity measurement improved by

2–3 orders of magnitude in sensitivity

• Satellite-to-satellite laser

interferometry, or

• Spaceborne quantum gradiometer

Continuous full-spectrum spaceborne

imaging spectrometry

• Targeted local to regional mapping,

with global access, across multiple

wavelengths

• Repeat frequency of hours to years,

depending on the rate of change of

the studied process

Improved spaceborne imaging

spectrometer

• 100-km swath and 30-m spatial

resolution in the VNIR

• Demonstration of spaceborne TIR

imaging spectrometer: 30-km

swath, 30-m spatial resolution

Forecasts of magnetic field for space weather effects on

satellites

What is the nature of deformation at plate boundaries and what are the implications for

earthquake hazards?

How do tectonics and climate interact to shape the Earth’s surface and create natural hazards?

What are the interactions among ice masses, oceans, and the solid Earth and their implications

for sea-level change?

How do magmatic systems evolve and under what conditions do volcanoes erupt?

What are the dynamics of the mantle and crust and how does the Earth’s surface respond?

What are the dynamics of the Earth’s magnetic field and its interactions with the

Earth system?

Rapid response to seismic disasters

Floods, landslides, and coastal erosion risk assessment

Improved estimates of future sea-level rise

Advanced planning for high-risk populations near volcanoes

Understanding mantle and crustal dynamics role in hazards

Scientific Challenges Color Code Examples of the Benefits to Society

High-resolution

topography

Variability of

Earth’s magnetic

field

Variability of

Earth’s gravity

field

Imaging

spectroscopy of

Earth’s changing

surface

Near Term

(5–10 Years)

Long Term

(10–25 Years)

Distribute all SRTM data, launch

ICESat, and demonstrate imaging

lidar capabilities in Earth orbit

Support of analysis of geomagnetic observations from current

satellites

• Development of a modularized

instrument package to facilitate

taking advantage of missions of

opportunity

Constellation of 4–6 satellites

• At a range of local times

• Approximately 800-km altitude in

polar orbit

GRACE

• Monthly estimation to within a

few millimeters of surface waterequivalent load at a few-hundredkilometers spatial resolution

GRACE follow-on mission

• Demonstration of satellite-tosatellite laser interferometry

technology

Continued spaceborne and airborne

imaging in the solar reflected

spectrum

• Develop airborne measurement

capability in the TIR (3–5 and 8–12

micrometers)
.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

. 61

out imaging spectroscopy across a broad portion of the electromagnetic spectrum, and

a GRACE follow-on to improve the resolution of temporal changes in Earth’s gravity

field.Several techniques and observations offer the promise to contribute in a major

fashion to solid-Earth science but require substantial technology development. Among

these are imaging of propagating seismic waves from space, linking space observations to processes occurring on and within the solid Earth beneath the oceans, and

subsurface imaging from space with ground-penetrating radar.

The solid Earth is inherently complex, and understanding it requires significant effort

in the analysis of data and their comparison with models. Simulations must be carried

out concurrently with data analysis so that the entire system can be studied and understood. High-performance computers dedicated to solid-Earth science are required to

carry out these calculations, as well as to manage the large volumes of scientific data

that the recommended observational strategies will yield. Distributed centers are the

preferred mode for processing, storing, and retrieving the needed data. Each observational strategy calls for new technologies, and the time frames when each new technology will be needed dictate the level and pace of required investment. All of the recommendations for solid-Earth science are predicated on maintaining NASA’s special capabilities in updating the terrestrial reference frame, monitoring Earth orientation parameters, and carrying out precise orbit determination. Each recommendation also calls

for ground-based validation and calibration measurements that are closely coordinated with the spaceborne observations. Finally, the expected new knowledge to be

gained about the solid Earth and its natural hazards provides compelling material with

which to inform and engage students at all educational levels.

The beginning of the 21st century is a time of unprecedented opportunity in solidEarth science. The confluence of advances in satellite-based observing systems, highperformance computing and communications, and recent fundamental discoveries, all

over the past few decades, promises an era in which many of the previously seemingly

intractable problems in Earth science are now ready to be solved. In the next two decades we will be in a position to reach new insights into earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, wildfires, landslides and floods, and the dynamics of the Earth’s core and mantle.

NASA has a unique and essential role to play in seizing this opportunity to understand

and manage the restless planet on which we all live.
.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

. 62

Credits

Cover: Land topography from GTOPO30,

USGS EROS Data Center, 1996. Walter Smith

and David Sandwell, Science, vol. 277, no.

5334, pp. 1956–1962, September 26, 1997.

Cover inset, top to bottom: Eyewire Images;

courtesy of Robert Eplett, OES CA; courtesy

of Austin Post, USGS/Cascade Volcano

Observatory.

Title page, top to bottom: courtesy of

Robert E. Wallace, USGS; NOAA/NGDC;

NASA/JPL/NIMA.

Pg. 2: Corbis.

Pg. 3: courtesy of Roger Hutchison.

Pg. 4: top, Getty Images; bottom, courtesy

of Steve Leatherman, Florida International

University.

Pg. 5: top, courtesy of Robert Schuster,

USGS; bottom, Corbis.

Pg. 6: courtesy of Ben Chao, Chopo Ma, and

Richard Ray, GSFC, and Richard Holme, GFZ

Potsdam.

Pg. 9: courtesy of Michael Heflin et al., JPL/

Caltech.

Pg. 11: top, courtesy of Robert Simmon,

GSFC; bottom, Getty Images.

Pg. 13: Getty Images.

Pg. 14: GSHAP.

Pg. 15: NASA/JPL/NIMA.

Pg. 16: left, Robert E. Wallace, USGS; right,

courtesy of Yuri Fialko, Mark Simons, and

Duncan Agnew, Geophysical Research Letters, vol. 28, no. 16, pp. 3063–3066, August

15, 2001.

Pg. 17: top, SCIGN collaboration / Marc

Wong, CalTrans; bottom, courtesy of Tom

Herring.

Pg. 18: courtesy of Doug Burbank.

Pg. 19: courtesy of Doug Burbank.

Pg. 20: Corbis.

Pg. 21: top, William Krabill et al., Science,

vol. 289, no. 5478, pp. 428–430, July 21, 2000,

courtesy of Jay Zwally, GSFC; bottom, courtesy of Steve Leatherman, Florida International University.

Pg. 22: Getty Images.

Pg. 23: top, Falk Amelung, Sjonni Jonsson,

Howard Zebker, and Paul Segall, Nature,

vol. 407, no. 6807, pp. 993–996, October 26,

2000; bottom, courtesy of Paul Lundgren,

JPL/Caltech.

Pg. 24: courtesy of Mark Simons.

Pg. 25: courtesy of David Fierstein.

Pg. 26: courtesy of Jeremy Bloxham.

Pg. 27: top, Weijia Kuang and Jeremy Bloxham, Nature, vol. 389, no. 6649, pp. 371–374,

September 25, 1997; bottom, courtesy of

Michael Purucker, Raytheon/GSFC.

Pg. 30: Nazca plate subduction courtesy of

Robert Simmon, GSFC; InSAR interferogram

courtesy of Matthew Pritchard, Mark

Simons, Paul Rosen, Scott Hensley, and Frank

Webb, Geophys. J. Int., vol. 150, pp. 362–

376, 2002.

Pg. 32–33: NASA/JPL/NIMA.

Pg. 34: courtesy of David Sandwell, UCSD.

Pg. 35: Data acquired by Terrapoint, LLC, for

the Puget Sound Lidar Consortium, image

courtesy of David Harding, GSFC.

Pg. 37: courtesy of Jeremy Bloxham.

Pg. 39: courtesy of Frank Lemoine, GSFC.

Pg. 41: right, NASA/GSFC/MITI/ERSDAC/

JAROS, and U.S./Japan ASTER Science Team;

left, courtesy of Robert Green, JPL/Caltech.

Pg. 43: courtesy of Robert Green,

JPL/Caltech.

Pg. 45: Dimitri Komatitsch and Jeroen Tromp,

2001, Proceedings, Supercomputing 2001

Conference.

Pg. 47: courtesy of Jeremy Bloxham.

Pg. 49: courtesy of Kristy Tiampo and John

Rundle, University of Colorado, Boulder.

Pg. 50: courtesy of Michael Gurnis, Caltech.

Pg. 52: courtesy of Tom Yunck, JPL/Caltech.

Pg. 53: courtesy of Herb Dragert, Geological

Survey of Canada.

Pg. 54: NASA/JPL.

Pg. 55: courtesy of the Texas Space Grant

Consortium.

References:

Chao, Ben et.al., 2002: Computation Technology Workshop: Solid Earth Summary.

ESE, 1996: Mission to Planet Earth Education Strategy.

ESE, 2000: Exploring Our Home Planet: NASA

Earth Science Enterprise Strategic Plan.

ESE, 2000: Research Strategy for 2000-2010.

NRC, 1997: Satellite Gravity and the Geosphere; National Research Council, Committee on Global Earth Gravity from Space;

National Academy Press, Washington, DC.

Editor: Jeff Booth, JPL/Caltech

Design & production: JPL Design Services –

David Hinkle, Adriane Jach, Marilyn Morgan,

Audrey Steffan
.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Solid Earth Science Working Group (SESWG)

Sean C. Solomon (Chair)

Carnegie Institution of Washington

Victor R. Baker

University of Arizona

Jeremy Bloxham

Harvard University

Douglas Burbank

University of California, Santa Barbara

Benjamin F. Chao

NASA Goddard Space Flight Center

Alan Chave

Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution

Andrea Donnellan

Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology

Alan Gillespie

University of Washington

Thomas Herring

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Raymond Jeanloz

University of California, Berkeley

Bernard Minster

University of California, San Diego

Walter C. Pitman, III

Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory,

Columbia University

Eric Rignot

Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology

Mark Simons

California Institute of Technology

Donald L. Turcotte

Cornell University

Mary Lou C. Zoback

U.S. Geological Survey

John LaBrecque (ex-officio)

NASA HQ

Charles Elachi (ex-officio)

Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology

Diane Evans (ex-officio)

Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology

63
.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

National Aeronautics and

Space Administration

Jet Propulsion Laboratory

California Institute of Technology

Pasadena, California

Web site: http://solidearth.jpl.nasa.gov

JPL 400-1040 11/02