alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 600.1503 Position report data formats and transmission. Unless otherwise specified, this subsection applies to all VMS units, MCSs and bundles. Units that can operate as both an EMTU and EMTU-C must meet the requirements for both an EMTU and an EMTU-C in order to gain type-approval as both. To be type-approved in any given fishery, a VMS unit must also meet any additional positioning information as required by the applicable VMS regulations and requirements in effect for each fishery or region for which the type-approval applies. The VMS unit must meet the following requirements: ( a ) Transmit all automatically-generated position reports, for vessels managed individually or grouped by fleet, that meet the latency requirement under § 600.1504.
( b ) When powered up, must automatically re-establish its position reporting function without manual intervention.
( c ) Position reports must contain all of the following: ( 1 ) Unique identification of an EMTU/EMTU-C and clear indication if the unit is an EMTU-C.
( 2 ) Date (year/month/day with century in the year) and time stamp (GMT) of the position fix.
( 3 ) Date (year/month/day with century in the year) and time stamp (GMT) that the EMTU-C position report was sent from the EMTU-C.
( 4 ) Position fixed latitude and longitude, including the hemisphere of each, which comply with the following requirements: ( i ) The position fix precision must be to the decimal minute hundredths.
( ii ) Accuracy of the reported position must be within 100 meters (328.1 ft).
( d ) An EMTU/EMTU-C must have the ability to: ( 1 ) Store 1,000 position fixes in local, non-volatile memory.
( 2 ) Allow for defining variable reporting intervals between 5 minutes and 24 hours.
( 3 ) Allow for changes in reporting intervals remotely and only by authorized users.
( e ) An EMTU/EMTU-C must generate specially identified position reports upon: ( 1 ) Antenna disconnection.
( 2 ) Loss of positioning reference signals.
( 3 ) Security events, power-up, power down, and other status data.
( 4 ) A request for EMTU/EMTU-C status information such as configuration of programming and reporting intervals.
( 5 ) The EMTUs loss of the mobile communications signals.
( 6 ) An EMTU must generate a specially identified position report upon the vessel crossing of a pre-defined geographic boundary.
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

      We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-38958, 333-50159, 333-47601, 333-70510 and
333-123069) of Whitehall Jewellers, Inc. of our reports dated April 13, 2005
relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedule, management's
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and
the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting which appears in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Chicago, Illinois

April 15, 2005
#### § 20.701 Standard of proof.

The party that bears the burden of proof shall prove his or her case or affirmative defense by a preponderance of the evidence.
#### § 1150.31 Computation.

In computing any period of time under these rules or in any order issued under them, the time begins with the day following the act, event, or default, and includes the last day of the period, unless it is a Saturday, Sunday, or Federal legal holiday, in which event it includes the next following business day. When the period of time prescribed or allowed is less than seven (7) days, intermediate Saturdays, Sundays, and Federal legal holidays shall be excluded from the computation.
SI()-I()03{)S-()I 4
Miami-Dad e Aviatio n Departmen t

P.O

. Bo x02550 4 ; 1 (^ ' •••::"!;, • Mr^

M Miami , Florid a 33102-550 4 M,A„ , ,sfF«NAT,ssi L *.R«S ¥T 305-876-700 0 F 305-876-094 8 www.miami-airport.co m con«,«rci. i Airport

s miamidade.go v Mtiim i InternalliHu l Aifpor i
Genera l Aviatio n Airports ; O^de-Coltic rTrainin g & Transitio n

Homc^ci d Gcncr*) ! Kcndjll'TomMm i Executiv e Opa-lock j Executiv e Marc h 4 , 201 0

Th e Honorabl e Raymon d H

. LaHoo d Secretar y U.S

. Departmen t o f Transportatio n 1200 NewJerse yAve , S E Washington , D C 2059 0 Docket DOT-OST-2010-003 4 Dea rMr , Secretary : O n behal f o f th e Mlaml-Dad e CountyAviatio n Department , whic h operate s Miam i Internationa l Airpor t (MIA) , I wan t t o than k

yo u fo rth e opportunityt o expres s ou rsuppor t fo rth e applicatio n fo r antitrus t immunityan d propose d Join t busines s agreemen t file d byAmerica n Airline s an d Japa n Airlines

. Th e propose d allianc e betwee n thes e tw o airline s i s vita l fo roneworl d t o compet e effectivel ywit h th e Sta ran d SkyTea m alliances

. Thi s increase d inter-alllanc e competitio n wil l i n tur n enhanc e th e benefit s of th e Department' s Ope n Skie s polic y- firs t bysolidifyin g U.S.-Japa n Ope n Skies , the n b yservin g a s a foundatio n fo rfurthe rliberalizatio n acros s Asia

. W e encourag e th e Departmen t o f Transportatio n t o approv e thi s applicatio n a s i t woul d enabl e thes e oneworl d allianc e airline s t o wor k closel ytogethe rt o delive rhighl ycompetitiv e ai r transportatio n services

. Approva l fo rth e AA/JA L allianc e wil l hav e a positiv e impact o n ai rtrave l b yofferin g customers mor e service , schedulin g an d pricin g option s an d wil l hel p t o ensure tha t customer s continu e t o benefi t fro m havin g thre e competitiv e ai ralliance s t o choos e from

. Additionally , withi n th e context o f MIA' s standin g a s th e secon d leadin g gatewa yt o th e Unite d States , an d a s th e leadin g gatewa yt o th e Lati n America n / Caribbea n Region , w e als o believ e that approva l o f thi s allianc e wil l affor d ou rairpor t an d communitya mor e competitiv e posture i n ou rabilityt o facilitat e trave l an d trad e betwee n th e America s an d Asia, therefor e stimulatin g greate reconomi cgrowt h durin g thes e difficul t economi ctimes

.

uickl yapprov e thi s application

.
#### § 38.8 Consistency with Federal law.

Any provisions of the laws of the State of Hawaii, as they now appear or as they may be amended or recodified, which are adopted by this part will apply only to the extent that they are not in conflict with any applicable Federal law or regulation.
Case 16-29179 Doc 6 Filed 09/13/16 Entered 09/13/16 13:26:55 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2
Case 16-29179 Doc 6 Filed 09/13/16 Entered 09/13/16 13:26:55 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2
§ 86.60 What does the Service consider when evaluating a project for demonstrating a commitment to environmental compliance, sustainability, and stewardship? ( a ) In evaluating a project under the criterion at § 86.51(c)(3), we consider if the application documents that the facility where the BIG-funded project is located has received official recognition for its voluntary commitment to environmental compliance, sustainability, and stewardship by exceeding regulatory requirements.
( b ) The official recognition must be part of a voluntary, established program administered by a Federal or State agency, local governmental agency, Sea Grant or equivalent entity, or a State or Regional marina organization.
( c ) The established program must require the facility to use management and operational techniques and practices that will ensure it continues to meet the high standards of the program and must contain a component that requires periodic review.
( d ) The facility must have met the criteria required by the established program and received official recognition by the due date of the application.
Exhibit 32.1    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Annual Report of T Bay Holdings, Inc. a Nevada corporation (the Company), on Form 10-KSB for the annual period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Xiaofeng Li, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.      /s/ Xiaofeng Li Xiaofeng Li Chief Executive Officer  Date: June 29, 2007
§ 217.123 Prohibitions. Except for the takings contemplated in § 217.120 and authorized by a LOA issued under §§ 216.106 of this chapter and 217.126, it is unlawful for any person to do any of the following in connection with the activities described in § 217.120 may: ( a ) Violate, or fail to comply with, the terms, conditions, and requirements of this subpart or a LOA issued under §§ 216.106 of this chapter and 217.126;
( b ) Take any marine mammal not specified in such LOA;
( c ) Take any marine mammal specified in such LOA in any manner other than as specified in § 217.122;
( d ) Take a marine mammal specified in such LOA if NMFS determines such taking results in more than a negligible impact on the species or stocks of such marine mammal; or
( e ) Take a marine mammal specified in such LOA if NMFS determines such taking results in an unmitigable adverse impact on the species or stock of such marine mammal for taking for subsistence uses.
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 190 (Monday, October 2, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 58006]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-8378]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Network Centric Operations Industry Consortium, 
Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on September 6, 2006, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act'', Network Centric Operations 
Industry Consortium, Inc. has filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were 
filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the 
recovery antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified 
circumstances. Specifically, CAE, St-Laurent, Quebec, Canada; PrismTech 
Corporation, Burlington, MA; COMCARE, Washington, DC; Emergency 
Interoperability Consortium, Washington, DC; Intelligent Automation, 
Inc., Rockville, MD; STM (Savunma Teknolojileri Muhendislik ve Ticaret 
A.S.), Ankara, Turkey; and SteelCloud, Herndon, VA have been added as 
parties to this venture.
    Also, LynuxWorks, Inc., San Jose, CA; and SAP Labs, Inc., 
Washington, DC have withdrawn as parties to this venture. In addition, 
Gallium Software, Inc. has changed its name to Gallium Visual Systems, 
Inc., Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and Network Centric Operations Industry 
Consortium, Inc. intends to file additional written notification 
disclosing all changes in membership.
    On November 19, 2004, Network Centric Operations Industry 
Consortium, Inc. filed its original notification pursuant to Section 
6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the 
Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on February 2, 
2005 (70 FR 5486).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on June 10, 
2006. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on July 20, 2006 (71 FR 41257).

Patricia A. Brink,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 06-8378 Filed 9-29-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 566

To amend title 10, United States Code, to provide that the crediting of

years of service for purposes of computing the retired and retainer

pay of enlisted members of the Armed Forces shall be made in the

same manner as applies to officers.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 25, 1993

Mr. MONTGOMERY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Armed Services

A BILL

To amend title 10, United States Code, to provide that

the crediting of years of service for purposes of computing the retired and retainer pay of enlisted members

of the Armed Forces shall be made in the same manner

as applies to officers.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Enlisted Members

5 Retirement Equity Act’’.
2

•HR 566 IH

1 SEC. 2. CREDITING OF YEARS OF SERVICE FOR COMPUT2 ING RETIRED AND RETAINER PAY.

3 (a) ARMY.—(1) Section 3925 of title 10, United

4 States Code, is amended—

5 (A) in subsection (a), by striking out ‘‘and of

6 computing his retired pay under section 3991 of this

7 title,’’; and

8 (B) by striking out subsection (c).

9 (2) Sections 3991(a) and 3992 of such title are each

10 amended by striking out ‘‘section 3925’’ in column 2 of

11 formula B of the table and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘sec12 tion 1405’’.

13 (b) NAVY AND MARINE CORPS.—Section 6333 of

14 such title is amended by striking out ‘‘his years of active

15 service in the armed forces’’ in column 2 of formula C

16 of the table in subsection (a) and inserting in lieu thereof

17 ‘‘the years of service that may be credited to him under

18 section 1405’’.

19 (c) AIR FORCE.—(1) Section 8925 of such title, is

20 amended—

21 (A) in subsection (a), by striking out ‘‘and of

22 computing his retired pay under section 8991 of this

23 title,’’; and

24 (B) by striking out subsection (c).

25 (2) Sections 8991(a) and 8992 of such title are each

26 amended by striking out ‘‘section 8925’’ in column 2 of
3

•HR 566 IH

1 formula B of the table and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘sec2 tion 1405’’.

3 (d) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 1405 of

4 such title is amended by adding at the end the following

5 new subsection:

6 ‘‘(c) EXCLUSION OF TIME REQUIRED TO BE MADE

7 UP.—Time required to be made up by an enlisted member

8 of the Army or Air Force under section 972 of this title

9 may not be counted in determining years of service under

10 subsection (a).’’.

11 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

12 The amendments made by section 2 shall apply to

13 the computation of the retired or retainer pay of any en14 listed member who retires or who is transferred to the

15 Fleet Reserve or the Fleet Marine Corps Reserve on or

16 after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
### KeyConcepts, LLC d/b/a Key-AerialGraphics 3229 East Friess Drive Phoenix AZ 85032 PH: (602) 456-5404 FAX: (866) 771-7636 June 20, 2015 United States Department of Transportation Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE West Building Ground Floor Room W12-140 Washington, DC 20590 Re: Response to request for additional information on Title 14 —> Chapter 1 —> Subchapter B —> Part 11 —> Subpart A —> 11.81 (Section d). By granting KeyConcepts, LLC d/b/a Key-AerialGraphics a 333 exemption, the benefits to public interest include:



### • Reduced noise pollution compared to hiring a light piston or turbine helicopter.



### • Improved safety as as the sUAS will not need to be flown from an airport or base and therefore no overflight of populated areas putting risk to persons on the ground.



### • Since the sUAS is unmanned there is no risk in the operation to the operator.



### • The market for aerial photography in the real estate industry will be made to a wider market, due to lower cost benefiting both the seller and buyer of said real estate.



### • When filming aerial images for marketing and promotion the public as a whole benefits from the increased safety & decreased operating expense.



### • Providing increased business opportunities for clients by reducing expenses directly and indirectly.



### • If requested to participate in SAR operations and as coordinated by official air-boss of operations the public benefits by having registered controlled and coordinated manned fix wing, rotorcraft and unmanned sUAS resources allowing more potential to located subject and utilizing the best resource for each phase or grid of the coordinated SAR. The benefits to public interest are made both financially by reducing cost and/or adding resources and to safety by eliminating the need to use and aircraft in extreme close quarters where such operations would put risk to a manned rotorcraft, the crew and possibly even to those on the ground.

KeyConcepts, LLC d/b/a Key-AerialGraphics recognizes that the public benefits most when tools and resources that meet special needs are utilized. As such we request this exemption so that we may add another tool and resource to our community along with the existing manned fixed wing and rotorcraft operations in the area.Our operation does not take the view of competing against manned operations, rather working in conjunction with to provide more options to the public where manned operations do not make the most sense due to price or safety concerns. Sincerely, Robyn Key Owner/Operator KeyConcepts, LLC d/b/a Key-AerialGraphics
§ 1011.11 How will the Presidio Trust use tax refund offset to collect a debt? ( a ) *Tax refund offset.* In most cases, the FMS uses the Treasury Offset Program to collect debts by the offset of tax refunds and other federal payments. See § 1011.9(c) of this part. If not already transferred to the FMS under § 1011.9 of this part, the Presidio Trust will refer to the Treasury Offset Program any delinquent, legally enforceable debt for collection by tax refund offset.
( b ) *Notice; certification.* At least 60 days prior to referring a debt to the Treasury Offset Program, the Presidio Trust will send notice to the debtor in accordance with the requirements of § 1011.4 of this part. The Presidio Trust will certify to the FMS's Treasury Offset Program, in writing, that the debt is delinquent and legally enforceable in the amount submitted and that the Presidio Trust has made reasonable efforts to obtain payment of the debt. In addition, the Presidio Trust will certify its compliance with all applicable due process and other requirements described in this part and other applicable law.
( c ) *Administrative review.* The notice described in § 1011.4 of this part will provide the debtor with at least 60 days prior to the initiation of tax refund offset to request an administrative review as described in § 1011.10(c) of this part. The Presidio Trust may suspend collection through tax refund offset and/or other collection actions pending the resolution of the debtor's dispute.
Case 16-28599 Doc 6-1 Filed 09/07/16 Entered 09/07/16 14:31:52 Desc Attach

 PDF Page 1 of 2
Case 16-28599 Doc 6-1 Filed 09/07/16 Entered 09/07/16 14:31:52 Desc Attach

 PDF Page 2 of 2
Personnel Commission

No. 81-465

#### Appeal of Hildegard Tamm (New Hampshire Personnel Commission)

July 7, 1982

*Bruce E. Friedman,*Franklin Pierce Law Center Family and Housing Law Clinic, by brief and orally, for the plaintiff.

*Gregory H. Smith,*attorney general *(Peter C. Scott,*assistant attorney general, on the brief and orally), for the defendant.

*647Per curiam.

The State employee in this case was employed by the New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission in a classified, full-time, permanent position beginning March 9, 1981. She alleges that on August 6, within her probationary period, she was told she was to be terminated for being “overqualified.” No hearing was held before the New Hampshire Personnel Commission because it concluded that our decision in *Appeal of Czeslaw Pawlus,*121 N.H. 273, 428 A.2d 487 (1981), precluded such a hearing. The plaintiff then appealed to this court, alleging that “overqualification” is not a proper ground for termination.

Nothing in the rules of the New Hampshire Department of Personnel indicates that a probationary employee may be dismissed for being “overqualified.” The plaintiff should be given an opportunity to prove her allegation because we cannot say as a matter of law that her dismissal was or was not “arbitrary, illegal, capricious or made in bad faith.” *See Appeal of Czeslaw Pawlus,*121 N.H. at 274, 428 A.2d at 488; *Clark v. Manchester,*113 N.H. 270, 275, 305 A.2d 668, 672 (1973).

*Appeal of Czeslaw Pawlus*does not prevent the personnel commission from hearing appeals brought by probationary employees. *Appeal of Oudens,*122 N.H. 642, 643, 448 A.2d 1374 (1982). Rather, we conclude that the personnel commission is the appropriate agency to consider the merits of the plaintiffs allegation; the commission has expertise in this area, and the dispute concerns its own rules. *See*Rules of the Department of Personnel, Rules I & II § 23 (probationary appointment and dismissal). Nothing in RSA 98:15 prevents the personnel commission from serving as the forum when a probationary employee claims she was wrongfully terminated. Of course, this court will review the commission’s decision only by way of a petition for a writ of certiorari. *See Melton v. Personnel Comm’n,*119 N.H. 272, 280, 401 A.2d 1060, 1065 (1979). We find no merit in plaintiff’s other arguments regarding estoppel and reliance.

*Remanded for a hearing on the merits.*
# EUR-Lex - 12004V401 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V401

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART III — THE POLICIES AND FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - TITLE VI — THE FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - CHAPTER I — PROVISIONS GOVERNING THE INSTITUTIONS - Section 4 — Provisions common to Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies - Article III-401 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0173 - 0173 *

Article III-401

Acts of the Council, of the Commission or of the European Central Bank which impose a pecuniary obligation on persons other than Member States shall be enforceable.

Enforcement shall be governed by the rules of civil procedure in force in the Member State in the territory of which it is carried out. The order for its enforcement shall be appended to the decision, without other formality than verification of the authenticity of the decision, by the national authority which the government of each Member State shall designate for this purpose and shall make known to the Commission and the Court of Justice of the European Union.

When these formalities have been completed on application by the party concerned, the latter may proceed to enforcement by bringing the matter directly before the competent authority, in accordance with the national law.

Enforcement may be suspended only by a decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union. However, the courts of the country concerned shall have jurisdiction over complaints that enforcement is being carried out in an irregular manner.

--------------------------------------------------
Case 16-26268 Doc 5 Filed 08/16/16 Entered 08/16/16 13:58:44 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2
Case 16-26268 Doc 5 Filed 08/16/16 Entered 08/16/16 13:58:44 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2