alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Your session is about to expire.Resume session

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Welcome.Log inorregisterCOPS OFFICE RESOURCE CENTER

HomeCatalogCartOrders

                    

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                CatalogMatches: 1Offline form Recent Popular Online Print OtherCOPS-W0861Civilian Oversight of the Police in Major CitiesSince the 1950s, when civilian oversight was first implemented in some American police departments, its use has grown and a variety of new forms have developed. Established to improve community relations, enhance transparency and increase accountability, all of these programs have the ultimate goal of improving the quality of local policing and thereby increasing public safety. To develop a better understanding of oversight programs in their various forms, how they have evolved over time, and the challenges to implementing them, the Office of Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS Office) collaborated with the Major Cities Chiefs Association (MCCA) to conduct a survey of MCCA member agencies. This publication discusses the results of that survey and the outcome of the round table held to discuss it. In doing so, it provides an overview of civilian oversight in major city police agencies.By Darrel W. Stephens, Ellen Scrivner, Josie F. CambareriCategories: Data and AnalysisLanguage: EnglishPublic linkhttps://portal.cops.usdoj.gov/resourcecenter?item=cops-w0861Click here to see the entire catalog.Cart:Download PDFWeb • Aug 2018Search catalogreset title abstract authors contentContaining text: exact phraseNot containing text: exact phraseLanguage:anyEnglishSpanishHmongVietnameseCategory:anyAlternatives to IncarcerationCommunity PartnershipsData and AnalysisEthics and IntegrityFoundations of Community PolicingHiring, Recruitment, and RetentionHomeland SecurityNew Immigrant CommunitiesNonviolent CrimeOtherPolice OperationsPOP Center ResourceSchool and Campus SafetyTechnologyTribalViolent CrimeYouth SafetyPublished after:Published before:Page1

                    

FOIA | No FEAR Act | Open Government | Privacy | Legal|HelpCopyright (C) U.S. Department of Justice, COPS Office, IT Division, 2012 - 2024. All rights reserved.
Rendered on Mon Mar 4 2024 at 05:49 (UTC-5) in 0.89 secEnterprise Framework 3.21.7.7 • Store Controls 3.3.1.7Survey 500303407 Section 60000560 Rules Hints Inactive
### Applications/ Industries: EVRAS System concentrators and crystallizers can be configured for a broad array of industrial applications including:



### • Oil & gas industry

• Landfill leachate

• Airports for recycling de-icing fluid

• Chemical industry

• Food processing

• Any other company or industry needing

to minimize liquid wastes volume through evaporative reduction.



### Features & Benefits:

• Thermally driven using low temperature

waste heat , no gas, fuel, or steam use.

• Decreases engine overheating

• Increase performance of gas

compression results in significant additional gas throughput

• No scaling or fouling of heat transfer

surfaces

• Process occurs at low temperature and

atmospheric pressure

• No exotic metals or alloys required

• Evaporation is insensitive to elevated or

varying TDS

• Portable & permanent installations

• Instrumented for un-manned operation

• Capable of full crystallization (zero

discharge)

• Concentrates up to 90% of waste stream

• Modular design

• Green process returns fresh water vapor

to the atmosphere 

# EVRAS

Evaporative Reduction And Solidification

The EVRASTM evaporative reduction and solidification system is a patented technology which utilizes low grade waste heat to concentrate and/or crystallize waste water streams without TDS induced corrosion or scaling.

EVRASTM Systems:

● Employ natural evaporation which is a function of water temperature, surface area and air flow

● Recover heat from jacket water, engine exhaust, inter-stage gas heat, and after coolers in order to maximize evaporation or additional gas throughput as required by customer at each project site

● Decrease engine overheating through the use of wet bulb vs. dry bulb cooling

● Reduce trucking and disposal costs while increasing gas production, turning a disposal liability into an incremental revenue producing asset

111 Congress, Suite 3000 ● Austin, TX 78701 ● (512) 538-2668 ● www.intevras.com

# EVRAS Evaporation Rate and In creased Throughput Examples

1 Waukesha 7044 with jacket water, auxiliary, exhaust, and 3 st age compression intercooler and after-cooler heat recovery



## Barnett Shale

111 Congress, Suite 3000 ● Austin, TX 78701 ● (512) 538-2668 ● www.intevras.com

## Piceance Basin

111 Congress, Suite 3000 ● Austin, TX 78701 ● (512) 538-2668 ● www.intevras.com

## Marcellus Shale

111 Congress, Suite 3000 ● Austin, TX 78701 ● (512) 538-2668 ● www.intevras.com
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<CIK> 0000868373
<NAME> DIGITAL BIOMETRICS INC
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         466,990
<SECURITIES>                                 5,690,371
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,369,383
<ALLOWANCES>                                   692,534
<INVENTORY>                                  3,633,659
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,985,847
<PP&E>                                       2,471,754
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,089,026
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              17,309,371
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,479,260
<BONDS>                                      2,374,739
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       107,773
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,347,599
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                17,309,371
<SALES>                                      6,821,025
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,327,272
<CGS>                                        3,814,167
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,181,481
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            11,742,220
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,676,182
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (11,686,903)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (11,686,903)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (11,686,903)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (1.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (1.24)
        


</TABLE>
# Map            Panama.
§ 217.5 Mitigation requirements. When conducting the activities identified in § 217.1(a), the mitigation measures contained in any LOA issued under §§ 216.106 of this chapter and 217.7 must be implemented. These mitigation measures shall include but are not limited to: ( a ) General conditions: ( 1 ) A copy of any issued LOA must be in the possession of SCWA, its designees, and work crew personnel operating under the authority of the issued LOA.
( 2 ) If SCWA observes a pup that may be abandoned, it shall contact the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) West Coast Regional Stranding Coordinator immediately and also report the incident to NMFS Office of Protected Resources within 48 hours. Observers shall not approach or move the pup.
( b ) SCWA crews shall cautiously approach the haul-out ahead of heavy equipment.
( c ) SCWA staff shall avoid walking or driving equipment through the seal haul-out.
( d ) Crews on foot shall make an effort to be seen by seals from a distance.
( e ) All work shall be completed as efficiently as possible and with the smallest amount of heavy equipment possible.
( f ) Boats operating near river haul-outs during monitoring shall be kept within posted speed limits and driven as far from the haul-outs as safely possible.
( g ) SCWA shall implement the following mitigation measures during pupping season (March 15-June 30): ( 1 ) SCWA shall maintain a one week no-work period between water level management events (unless flooding is an immediate threat) to allow for an adequate disturbance recovery period. During the no-work period, equipment must be removed from the beach;
( 2 ) A water level management event may not occur for more than two consecutive days unless flooding threats cannot be controlled.
( 3 ) If a pup less than one week old is on the beach where heavy machinery will be used or on the path used to access the work location, the management action shall be delayed until the pup has left the site or the latest day possible to prevent flooding while still maintaining suitable fish rearing habitat. In the event that a pup remains present on the beach in the presence of flood risk, SCWA shall consult with NMFS and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife to determine the appropriate course of action. SCWA shall determine if pups less than one week old are on the beach prior to a breaching event.
( 4 ) Physical and biological monitoring shall not be conducted if a pup less than one week old is present at the monitoring site or on a path to the site.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 543 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 543

  To remove the restrictions on the export of Alaskan North Slope oil.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 21, 1993

 Mr. Thomas of California (for himself, Mr. Doolittle, Mr. Dooley, Mr. 
 Archer, Mr. Gallegly, and Mr. Zimmer) introduced the following bill; 
which was referred jointly to the Committees on Foreign Affairs, Energy 
                  and Commerce, and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To remove the restrictions on the export of Alaskan North Slope oil.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXPORT ADMINISTRATION ACT AMENDMENT.

    Section 7(d) of the Export Administration Act of 1979 (50 U.S.C. 
2406(d)) is hereby repealed.

SEC. 2. OTHER PROVISIONS OF LAW.

    The export of domestically produced crude oil transported by 
pipeline over right-of-way granted pursuant to section 203 of the 
Trans-Alaska Pipeline Authorization Act (43 U.S.C. 1652) shall not be 
subject to the restrictions contained in section 28(u) of the Mineral 
Leasing Act of 1920 (30 U.S.C. 185), section 103 of the Energy Policy 
and Conservation Act (42 U.S.C. 6212), section 28 of the Outer 
Continental Shelf Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 1354), or section 7430(e) of 
title 10, United States Code, or any regulations issued under any such 
provision of law.

                                 <all>
```
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________ No. 96-31209 Summary Calendar

_____________________ BILLY SINCLAIR, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus KELLY WARD, Warden, Defendant-Appellee.

_______________________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for

the Western District of Louisiana

(95-CV-896)

_______________________________________________________ June 26, 1997 Before REAVLEY, BARKSDALE and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Billy Sinclair argues that the district court erred in dismissing his complaint as frivolous. Sinclair alleged that his temporary placement as a protected inmate in a disciplinary detention unit deprived him of his liberty interest in his classification status and the privileges accompanying that status. Sinclair also alleged that his placement in that unit2

for an extended lockdown constituted the imposition of cruel and unusual punishment and violated his right to equal protection. Sinclair also alleged that the defendant warden retaliated against him by assigning him a farm line job because he exercised his right of access to the courts and his right to file complaints against prison officials and employees. Although appellant did not proceed in forma pauperis , under the provisions of the 1996 Prison Litigation Reform Act, the district court correctly determined that Sinclair’s complaint was frivolous. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). Sinclair’s temporary assignment to a detention unit usually reserved for discipinary violations, his assignment to a different prison job, or termination of trusty status do not implicate protected liberty interests. Sandin v. Connor, __U.S.__, 115 S.Ct. 2293, 2301, 132 L.Ed.2d 418 (1995). See also Meachum v. Fano , 427 U.S. 215, 228 (1976). Additionally, as Sinclair has failed to allege or demonstrate that his position as a litigant has been prejudiced by being denied access to a law library or not being allowed to purchase a typewriter while in lockdown, he has not shown that his constitutional right of access to the courts has been violated. Eason v. Thaler, 73 F.3d 1322 (5th Cir. 1996). Sinclair argues for the first time on appeal that he was subjected to on-the-job harassment, monitoring of mail and3

telephone calls in retaliation for his filing complaints concerning wrongdoing in the prison. Because Sinclair failed to raise these claims properly in the district court, these issues must be reviewed for plain error only. See United States v. Calverley , 37 F.3d 160, 162-164 (1994)(en banc). Sinclair’s allegations and the responses to his administrative complaint do not raise an inference of a retaliatory motive, and these claims require the resolution of factual issues which do not rise to the level of plain error. Thus these issues are not subject to review.
AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                      15,128,750
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  638,299
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,109,511
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            16,947,367
<PP&E>                                       5,768,913
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,901,892
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              20,085,194
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          756,414
<BONDS>                                         88,175
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       102,852
<OTHER-SE>                                  19,137,753
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                20,085,194
<SALES>                                      3,009,649
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,009,649
<CGS>                                        1,965,989
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,965,989
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,454,295
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              24,317
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,154,978)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       912
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,155,890)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,155,890)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.26)


</TABLE>
§ 665.965 Fishing permit procedures and criteria. ( a ) *Rose Atoll Monument non-commercial fishing permit* — ( 1 ) *Applicability.* Both the owner and operator of a vessel used to non-commercially fish for, take, retain, or possess MUS in the Monument must have a permit issued under this section, and the permit must be registered for use with that vessel.
( 2 ) *Eligibility criteria.* A permit issued under this section may be issued only to a community resident of American Samoa.
( 3 ) *Terms and conditions.* ( i ) Customary exchange of fish harvested under a non-commercial permit within the Monument is allowed, except that customary exchange by fishermen engaged in recreational fishing is prohibited.
( ii ) Monetary reimbursement under customary exchange shall not exceed actual fishing trip expenses, including but not limited to ice, bait, fuel, or food.
( b ) *Rose Atoll Monument recreational charter permit* — ( 1 ) *Applicability.* Both the owner and operator of a vessel that is chartered to fish recreationally for, take, retain, or possess MUS in the Monument must have a permit issued under this section, and the permit must be registered for use with that vessel. Charter boat customers are not required to obtain a permit.
( 2 ) *Permit eligibility criteria.* To be eligible for a permit issued under this section, a charter business must be established legally under the laws of American Samoa.
( 3 ) *Terms and conditions.* ( i ) The sale or exchange through barter or trade of fish caught by a charter boat fishing in the Monument is prohibited.
( ii ) No MUS harvested under a recreational charter fishing permit may be used for the purposes of customary exchange.
( c ) *Application.* An application for a permit required under this section must be submitted to PIRO as described in § 665.13.
( d ) *Transfer.* A permit issued under this section is not transferrable.
( e ) *Reporting and recordkeeping.* The operator of a vessel subject to the requirements of this section must comply with the terms and conditions described in § 665.14.
[78 FR 33003, June 3, 2013, as amended at 78 FR 39583, July 2, 2013]
# EUR-Lex - 12003T014 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12003T014

**Act concerning the conditions of accession of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia and the Slovak Republic and the adjustments to the Treaties on which the European Union is founded - Part two : Adjustments to the Treaties - Title I : Institutional provisions - Chapter 4 : the Economic and Social Committee - **

*
Official Journal L 236 , 23/09/2003 P. 0037 - 0038 *

Article 14

The second paragraphs of Article 258 of the EC Treaty and Article 166 of the Euratom Treaty are replaced by the following:

"The number of members of the Committee shall be as follows:

Belgium | 12 |

Czech Republic | 12 |

Denmark | 9 |

Germany | 24 |

Estonia | 7 |

Greece | 12 |

Spain | 21 |

France | 24 |

Ireland | 9 |

Italy | 24 |

Cyprus | 6 |

Latvia | 7 |

Lithuania | 9 |

Luxembourg | 6 |

Hungary | 12 |

Malta | 5 |

Netherlands | 12 |

Austria | 12 |

Poland | 21 |

Portugal | 12 |

Slovenia | 7 |

Slovakia | 9 |

Finland | 9 |

Sweden | 12 |

United Kingdom | 24" |

--------------------------------------------------
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND 1996 AND THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997,
1996 AND 1995 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM
10-K FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                    
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    6-MOS 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996  
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996  
<CASH>                                          18,293   
<SECURITIES>                                    44,859 
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,452 
<ALLOWANCES>                                       609 
<INVENTORY>                                          0 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                75,791
<PP&E>                                          13,223 
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,852 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  83,320   
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,769 
<BONDS>                                              0 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0 
<PREFERRED>                                          0  
<COMMON>                                       176,816 
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    83,320 
<SALES>                                         27,297
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                33,188  
<CGS>                                            1,338
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   28,633
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0   
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 190
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,219 
<INCOME-TAX>                                       809  
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,410 
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0   
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0  
<CHANGES>                                            0  
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,410
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.16 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.15  
        

</TABLE>