### 44769 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 148 / Friday, August 1, 2014 / Notices

necessary resources to respond to an oil spill in a timely manner. If implemented effectively, the FRP will reduce the impact and severity of oil spills and may prevent spills because of the identification of risks at the facility. Although the owner or operator is the primary data user, EPA also uses the data in certain situations to ensure that facilities comply with the regulation and to help allocate response resources. State and local governments may use the data, which are not generally available elsewhere and can greatly assist local emergency preparedness planning efforts. The EPA reviews all submitted FRPs and must approve FRPs for those facilities whose discharges may cause significant and substantial harm to the environment in order to ensure that facilities believed to pose the highest risk have planned for adequate resources and procedures to respond to a spill. (See 40 CFR 112.20(f)(3) for further information about the criteria for significant and substantial harm.) None of the information collected under the FRP rule is believed to be confidential. One of the criteria necessary for information to be classified as confidential (40 CFR 2.208) is that a business must show that it has previously taken reasonable measures to protect the confidentiality of the information and that it intends to continue to take such measures. The EPA has provided no assurances of confidentiality to facility owners or operators when they file their FRPs.

Form Numbers: None. Respondents/affected entities: Entities potentially affected by this action are the owner or operator of a facility that is required to have a spill prevention, control, and countermeasure (SPCC) plan under the Oil Pollution Prevention regulation (40 CFR part 112) and that could cause substantial harm to the environment must prepare and submit to EPA an FRP. The criteria for a substantial harm facility include: (1) The facility transfers oil over water to or from a vessel and has a total storage capacity of greater than or equal to 42,000 gallons; or (2) the facility’s total oil storage capacity is greater than or equal to one million gallons and one or more of the following harm factors are met: Insufficient secondary containment; proximity to fish and wildlife and sensitive environments; a discharge of oil could shut down a drinking water intake; the facility experienced a reportable oil discharge of 10,000 gallons or more in last 5 years; or other factors considered by the Regional Administrator. (See 40 CFR 112.20(b)(1) and (f) for further information about the criteria for substantial harm.)

Respondent’s obligation to respond: Mandatory under section 311(j)(5) of the Clean Water Act, as amended by the Oil Pollution Act of 1990.

Estimated number of respondents: 22,966 (total).

Frequency of response: Less than once
per year.

Total estimated burden: 455,743 hours (per year). Burden is defined at 5 CFR 1320.03(b).

Total estimated cost (with overhead): $17,630,700 (per year), includes $14,763 annualized capital or operation & maintenance costs.

Changes in estimates: The EPA estimates that there is slight reduction in the hours of total estimated respondent burden (approximate reduction of 7,676 hours) compared with the ICR currently approved by OMB. This estimate is based on EPA’s current inventory of facilities that have submitted and are maintaining an FRP as per 40 CFR part 112 versus the projected inventory. The EPA has not amended the FRP regulation since the last ICR renewal that would affect the per-facility burden. The EPA will consider the comments received and amend the ICR as appropriate.

Dated: July 28, 2014. Lawrence M. Stanton, Office Director, Office of Emergency Management.
[FR Doc. 2014–18194 Filed 7–31–14; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6560–50–P**

**ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** 

**[ER–FRL–9016–2]**

**Environmental Impact Statements; Notice of Availability** 

Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General Information (202)
564–7146 or http://www.epa.gov/ compliance/nepa/. Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact

Statements Filed 07/21/2014 Through 07/25/2014 Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

Notice

Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA’s comment letters on EISs are available at: http:// www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/ eisdata.html. EIS No. 20140202, Final EIS, NPS, MD,

Antietam National Battlefield, Monocacy National Battlefield, Manassas National Battlefield Park, Final White-tailed Deer Management Plan, Review Period Ends: 09/03/ 2014, Contact: Tracy Atkins 303–969–
2325. EIS No. 20140203, Final EIS, USFS, CO,

Gore Creek Restoration, Review Period Ends: 09/02/2014, Contact: Doug Myhre 970–638–4178. EIS No. 20140204, Final EIS, USACE,

NC, Village of Bald Head Island Shoreline Stabilization Project, Review Period Ends: 09/02/2014, Contact: Ronnie Smith 910–251–4829. EIS No. 20140205, Final EIS, USFWS,

OH, Ballville Dam Project, Review Period Ends: 09/02/2014, Contact: Brian Elkington 612–713–5168. EIS No. 20140206, Draft EIS, FHWA,

NY, Portageville Bridge Project, Comment Period Ends: 09/15/2014, Contact: Jonathan McDade 518–431–
4127. EIS No. 20140207, Final EIS, USACE,

SC, Haile Gold Mine Project, Review Period Ends: 09/02/2014, Contact: Dr. Richard L. Darden 843–329–8043. EIS No. 20140208, Final EIS, NOAA, MI,

Thunder Bay National Marine Sanctuary Boundary Expansion, Review Period Ends: 09/02/2014, Contact: Helene Scalliet 301–713–
7281. EIS No. 20140209, Draft EIS, USACE,

CA, San Elijo Lagoon Restoration Project, Comment Period Ends: 09/29/2014, Contact: Meris BantilanSmith 760–602–4836.
Dated: July 29, 2014. Cliff Rader, Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 2014–18272 Filed 7–31–14; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6560–50–P**

**ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** 

**[EPA–HQ–ORD–2014–0564; FRL–9914–72– ORD]** 

**Human Studies Review Board; Notification of a Public Webinar/**  **Teleconference**

**AGENCY :**  Environmental Protection Agency.

**ACTION :**  Notice.

**SUMMARY :**  The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of the Science Advisor announces a public Webinar/ teleconference of the Human Studies Review Board (HSRB) to discuss its draft report on the HSRB meeting held August 15, 2014.

**DATES :**  The Webinar/teleconference will be held on Friday, August 15, 2014,