30928 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 104 / Monday, June 1, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 

and thermal conductivity of Metamic 

HT neutron-absorbing structural 

material. The commenter noted that the 

justification for this change is that these 

properties have little variability when 

Metamic HT is fabricated according to 

the manufacturer’s manual. The 

commenter asked the NRC what it 

thinks testing is for if not to verify that 

the product has been made according to 

the specifications in the manufacturer’s 

manual. 

NRC Response 

This issue was addressed by the NRC 

staff in its SER, and the commenters do 

not raise any additional information that 

would alter the staff’s determination 

that the HI–STORM FW System, 

Amendment No. 1, Revision 1, casks, 

when used within the requirements of 

the proposed CoC, will safely store SNF. 

In its March 19, 2015, SER (ADAMS 

Accession No. ML14276A620), the NRC 

staff concluded that this was acceptable 

for this specific application. For a 

detailed discussion regarding the NRC 

staff’s evaluation, see Section 4 of the 

SER. 

Issue 11: Exemptions 

One commenter contended that a 

general licensee seeking to load spent 

nuclear fuel into the Holtec HI–STORM 

FW System in accordance with the 

changes described in this rulemaking 

would have to request an exemption 

from the requirements of 10 CFR 72.212 

and 72.214. Another commenter 

asserted that once Holtec has been given 

its original CoC, there should be no 

‘‘exemptions.’’ 

NRC Response 

The revisions to Amendment No. 1 of 

CoC 1032 for the HI–STORM FW 

System is to provide changes to the cask 

system so that general licensees do not 

need to request an exemption from any 

requirements of 10 CFR 72.212 or 10 

CFR 72.214. Like all other proposed CoC 

amendments or revisions, the general 

licensee under 10 CFR 72.212(b)(5) will 

have to perform written evaluations 

which establish that the cask will 

conform to the terms, conditions, and 

specifications of a CoC or an amended 

CoC listed in § 72.214. 

Issue 12: Reduced Circulation of Air for 

Cooling 

Two commenters objected that the 

proposed change in the HI–STORM FW 

System CoC would restrict the 

circulation of air for cooling spent fuel 

within the MPC or cask. 

NRC Response 

The NRC staff evaluated this issue as 

part of its SER and concluded that there 

is no significant reduction in the cooling 

capacity of the HI–STORM FW System 

as a result of the revisions requested by 

the applicant. The NRC staff’s SER 

determined that CoC 1032, Amendment 

No. 1, Revision 1, casks, when used 

within the requirements of the CoC, will 

safely store SNF. The comment presents 

no information that the NRC has not 

already considered, or that would cause 

the NRC to change its analysis. 

The purpose of the revision is to 

permit the more compact spent fuel 

assemblies now in some reactors’ spent 

fuel storage pools to be loaded into the 

HI–STORM FW System for dry storage. 

In its March 19, 2015, SER (ADAMS 

Accession No. ML14276A620), the NRC 

staff found that approval of the 

application would permit a volumetric 

increase of 0.6 percent of the fuel and 

a reduction of 0.13 percent of the 

original flow area of the 14-rod-by-14- 

rod fuel assembly previously approved 

for use in this cask system. The NRC 

staff also found, however, that the 

reduced flow area through the 14x14B 

fuel assembly ‘‘is still larger than the 

17x17 assembly flow area used as the 

bounding scenario in the thermal 

analysis. As a result, the flow resistance 

factor is still less restrictive than the one 

used in the bounding scenario, and the 

passive decay heat removal of the 

proposed 14x14B assembly is still 

conservative.’’ The NRC staff also found 

that the spent fuel cladding ‘‘continues 

to be protected against degradation 

leading to gross ruptures under longterm storage by maintaining cladding 

temperatures below 752 °F (400 °C),’’ 

and ‘‘continues to be protected against 

degradation leading to gross ruptures 

under off-normal and accident 

conditions by maintaining cladding 

temperatures below 1058 °F (570 °C). 

Protection of the cladding against 

degradation is expected to allow ready 

retrieval of spent fuel for further 

processing or disposal.’’ 

Therefore, the NRC staff has 

concluded that the comments received 

on the companion proposed rule for the 

HI–STORM FW System, Amendment 

No. 1, Revision 1, are not significant 

adverse comments as defined in 

NUREG–BR–0053, Revision 6, ‘‘United 

States Nuclear Regulatory Commission 

Regulations Handbook’’ (ADAMS 

Accession No. ML052720461). 

Therefore, this rule will become 

effective as scheduled. 

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 27th day 

of May, 2015. 

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

Leslie Terry, 

Acting Chief, Rules, Announcements, and 

Directives Branch, Division of Administrative 

Services, Office of Administration. 

[FR Doc. 2015–13081 Filed 5–29–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 39 

[Docket No. FAA–2014–0342; Directorate 

Identifier 2014–NM–007–AD; Amendment 

39–18168; AD 2015–11–05] 

RIN 2120–AA64 

Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing 

Company Airplanes 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new 

airworthiness directive (AD) for certain 

The Boeing Company Model 747–400, 

747–400D, 747–400F, 747–8F, and 747– 

8 series airplanes. This AD was 

prompted by reports of very high 

temperatures, near the floor in the aft 

lower lobe cargo compartment. This AD 

requires installing an additional zone 

temperature sensor (ZTS) assembly in 

the aft cargo compartment, and, for 

certain airplanes, installing tape and 

replacing the markers in the bulk cargo 

compartment. We are issuing this AD to 

prevent overheating of the aft lower lobe 

cargo compartment, where, if 

temperature sensitive cargo is present, 

the release of flammable vapors could 

result in a fire or explosion if exposed 

to an ignition source. 

DATES: This AD is effective July 6, 2015. 

The Director of the Federal Register 

approved the incorporation by reference 

of certain publications listed in this AD 

as of July 6, 2015. 

ADDRESSES: For service information 

identified in this AD, contact Boeing 

Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data 

& Services Management, P.O. Box 3707, 

MC 2H–65, Seattle, WA 98124–2207; 

telephone 206–544–5000, extension 1; 

fax 206–766–5680; Internet https://

www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view 

this referenced service information at 

the FAA, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., 

Renton, Washington. For information on 

the availability of this material at the 

FAA, call 425–227–1221. It is also 

available on the Internet at http://

www.regulations.gov by searching for 


Lhorne on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 104 / Monday, June 1, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 30929 

and locating Docket No. FAA–2014– 

0342. 

Examining the AD Docket 

You may examine the AD docket on 

the Internet at http://

www.regulations.gov by searching for 

and locating Docket No. FAA–2014– 

0342; or in person at the Docket 

Management Facility between 9 a.m. 

and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays. The AD docket 

contains this AD, the regulatory 

evaluation, any comments received, and 

other information. The address for the 

Docket Office (phone: 800–647–5527) is 

Docket Management Facility, U.S. 

Department of Transportation, Docket 

Operations, M–30, West Building 

Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 

New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, 

DC 20590. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Susan Monroe, Aerospace Engineer, 

Cabin Safety and Environmental 

Systems Branch, ANM–150S, FAA, 

1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA; 

phone: 425–917–6457; fax: 425–917– 

6590; email: susan.l.monroe@faa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Discussion 

We issued a notice of proposed 

rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR 

part 39 by adding an AD that would 

apply to certain The Boeing Company 

Model 747–400, 747–400D, 747–400F, 

747–8F, and 747–8 series airplanes. The 

NPRM published in the Federal 

Register on June 25, 2014 (79 FR 35968). 

The NPRM was prompted by reports of 

very high temperatures, up to 67 degrees 

Celsius (152 degrees Fahrenheit), near 

the floor in the aft lower lobe cargo 

compartment on certain Model 747 

airplanes. The NPRM proposed to 

require installing an additional ZTS in 

the aft cargo compartment. For certain 

airplanes, the NPRM proposed to first 

require installing tape and replacing the 

markers in the bulk cargo compartment, 

unless terminated by the early 

installation of the ZTS. We are issuing 

this AD to prevent overheating of the aft 

lower lobe cargo compartment, where, if 

temperature sensitive cargo is present, 

the release of flammable vapors could 

result in a fire or explosion if exposed 

to an ignition source. 

Comments 

We gave the public the opportunity to 

participate in developing this AD. The 

following presents the comments 

received on the NPRM (79 FR 35968, 

June 25, 2014) and the FAA’s response 

to each comment. 

Request To Clarify ‘‘Required for 

Compliance’’ (RC) Steps 

United Airlines (UA) asked that we 

clarify the actions required in the NPRM 

(79 FR 35968, June 25, 2014) by adding 

instructions for steps labeled, and not 

labeled, as ‘‘RC’’ in the required service 

information. UA did not provide a 

reason for this request. 

We infer that the commenter is 

referring to Boeing Special Attention 

Service Bulletin 747–21–2550, dated 

December 6, 2013, which includes ‘‘RC’’ 

language. (Boeing Special Attention 

Service Bulletin 747–21–2544, Revision 

2, dated December 11, 2014, does not 

include ‘‘RC’’ language.) We 

acknowledge the commenter’s request 

and provide the following clarification. 

The actions specified in Boeing 

Special Attention Service Bulletin 747– 

21–2550, dated December 6, 2013, 

include steps that are identified as RC 

because these steps have a direct effect 

on detecting, preventing, resolving, or 

eliminating an identified unsafe 

condition. Therefore, for service 

information that incorporates the RC 

concept, steps that are identified as RC, 

including substeps and identified 

figures, must be done to comply with 

the AD. The RC concept does not apply 

to Boeing Special Attention Service 

Bulletin 747–21–2544, Revision 2, dated 

December 11, 2014, which does not 

include any RC steps. We have added a 

new paragraph (j)(4) in this AD to 

describe the RC concept. 

Request To Clarify Certain Language in 

the Summary Section 

Boeing asked that we clarify certain 

language in the Summary section of the 

NPRM (79 FR 35968, June 25, 2014) to 

specify that the solution to the unsafe 

condition is the installation of a ‘‘zone 

temperature sensor assembly,’’ rather 

than a ‘‘zone temperature sensor.’’ 

Boeing stated that the ZTS is a 

component within the ZTS assembly, 

and added that omitting the word 

‘‘assembly’’ could confuse operators. 

We agree with the commenter for the 

reason provided. We have included the 

word ‘‘assembly’’ after references to the 

ZTS in the SUMMARY of this final rule. 

Request To Clarify Certain Language in 

the Discussion Section 

Boeing asked that we clarify the first 

sentence of the Discussion section of the 

NPRM (79 FR 35968, June 25, 2014) to 

specify that the high temperatures near 

the floor in the aft lower lobe cargo 

compartment were found only on 

certain Model 747 airplanes. Boeing 

stated that the wording in the NPRM is 

too broad for the investigation that took 

place. 

We agree with the request. We have 

changed the Discussion section of this 

final rule accordingly. 

Boeing also asked that we clarify the 

following sentence of the Discussion 

section of the NPRM (79 FR 35968, June 

25, 2014): ‘‘Under these conditions, the 

switches will not command the system 

valves properly, and the switches may 

fail to shut off the flow of hot air to the 

lower lobe cargo compartment, causing 

compartment temperatures to rise 

beyond 60 degrees Celsius (140 degrees 

Fahrenheit).’’ Boeing asked that the 

word ‘‘will’’ be changed to ‘‘may’’ in 

that sentence, because the blockage 

condition does not guarantee that the 

temperature switches will not control 

the system properly. 

We acknowledge and agree with the 

commenter’s concern. However, since 

that level of detail does not reappear in 

a final rule, no change to this final rule 

is necessary in this regard. 

Request To Require Additional Actions 

for Certain Airplanes 

Boeing asked that airplanes having 

certain variable numbers specified in 

paragraph (g)(1) of the proposed AD (79 

FR 35968, June 25, 2014) be required to 

accomplish the actions specified in 

paragraph (g)(2) of the proposed AD. 

Boeing stated that airplanes having 

those variable numbers might have had 

a partial installation done in 

production. Boeing also stated that in 

the next revision of Boeing Special 

Attention Service Bulletin 747–21– 

2544, the action for those airplanes will 

be a general visual inspection to 

determine if both markers and tape are 

installed, and installation of the markers 

and tape if necessary. 

We agree with the commenter. Boeing 

Special Attention Service Bulletin 747– 

21–2544, Revision 2, dated December 

11, 2014, has been issued and addresses 

the concerns identified by the 

commenter. Therefore, we have revised 

this final rule to remove paragraphs 

(g)(1) and (g)(2) of the proposed AD. We 

have also revised paragraph (g) of this 

AD to include Boeing Special Attention 

Service Bulletin 747–21–2544, Revision 

2, dated December 11, 2014, as well as 

the option of contacting the FAA for an 

approval method to accomplish the 

actions. We have added Boeing Special 

Attention Service Bulletin 747–21– 

2544, Revision 1, dated September 30, 

2013, to paragraph (i) of this AD. 

Request To Remove Airplane Variable 

Number RC520 

Boeing asked that we change 

paragraph (g)(1)(ii) of the proposed AD 

(79 FR 35968, June 25, 2014) to remove 

airplane variable number RC520 


Lhorne on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
30930 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 104 / Monday, June 1, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 

because it is not a valid airplane 

variable number. 

We agree with the commenter for the 

reason provided. That airplane was 

identified in paragraph (g)(1)(ii) of the 

NPRM (79 FR 35968, June 25, 2014). 

That paragraph, as explained 

previously, is not included in this final 

rule. 

Conclusion 

We reviewed the relevant data, 

considered the comments received, and 

determined that air safety and the 

public interest require adopting this AD 

with the changes described previously, 

except for minor editorial changes. We 

have determined that these minor 

changes: 

• Are consistent with the intent that 

was proposed in the NPRM (79 FR 

35968, June 25, 2014) for correcting the 

unsafe condition; and 

• Do not add any additional burden 

upon the public than was already 

proposed in the NPRM (79 FR 35968, 

June 25, 2014). 

We also determined that these 

changes will not increase the economic 

burden on any operator or increase the 

scope of this AD. 

Related Service Information Under 1 

CFR Part 51 

We reviewed Boeing Special 

Attention Service Bulletin 747–21– 

2544, Revision 2, dated December 11, 

2014; and Boeing Special Attention 

Service Bulletin 747–21–2550, dated 

December 6, 2013. The service 

information describes procedures for 

installing warning tape and markers in 

the bulk cargo compartment and 

installing an additional zone 

temperature sensor assembly in the aft 

cargo compartment. This service 

information is reasonably available 

because the interested parties have 

access to it through their normal course 

of business or by the means identified 

in the ADDRESSES section of this AD. 

Costs of Compliance 

We estimate that this AD affects 130 

airplanes of U.S. registry. 

We estimate the following costs to 

comply with this AD: 

ESTIMATED COSTS

Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per 

product 

Cost on U.S. 

operators 

Install ZTS assembly .............. 91 work-hours × $85 per hour = $7,735 ................................ $7,545 $15,280 $1,986,400 

We estimate the following costs to do 

the optional actions specified in this 

AD. 

OPTIONAL COSTS

Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per 

product 

Install tape and markers .................. 1 work-hour × $85 per hour = $85 ............................................................ $33 $118 

Authority for This Rulemaking 

Title 49 of the United States Code 

specifies the FAA’s authority to issue 

rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, 

section 106, describes the authority of 

the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: 

Aviation Programs, describes in more 

detail the scope of the Agency’s 

authority. 

We are issuing this rulemaking under 

the authority described in Subtitle VII, 

Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: 

‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that 

section, Congress charges the FAA with 

promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in 

air commerce by prescribing regulations 

for practices, methods, and procedures 

the Administrator finds necessary for 

safety in air commerce. This regulation 

is within the scope of that authority 

because it addresses an unsafe condition 

that is likely to exist or develop on 

products identified in this rulemaking 

action. 

Regulatory Findings 

This AD will not have federalism 

implications under Executive Order 

13132. This AD will not have a 

substantial direct effect on the States, on 

the relationship between the national 

government and the States, or on the 

distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government. 

For the reasons discussed above, I 

certify that this AD: 

(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ under Executive Order 12866, 

(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures 

(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979), 

(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation 

in Alaska, and 

(4) Will not have a significant 

economic impact, positive or negative, 

on a substantial number of small entities 

under the criteria of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation 

safety, Incorporation by reference, 

Safety. 

Adoption of the Amendment 

Accordingly, under the authority 

delegated to me by the Administrator, 

the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as 

follows: 

PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS 

DIRECTIVES 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 39 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. 

§ 39.13 [Amended] 

■ 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding 

the following new airworthiness 

directive (AD): 

2015–11–05 The Boeing Company: 

Amendment 39–18168; Docket No. 

FAA–2014–0342; Directorate Identifier 

2014–NM–007–AD. 

(a) Effective Date 

This AD is effective July 6, 2015. 

(b) Affected ADs 

None. 

(c) Applicability 

This AD applies to The Boeing Company 

Model 747–400, 747–400D, 747–400F, 747– 

8F, and 747–8 series airplanes, certificated in 

any category, as identified in paragraphs 

(c)(1) and (c)(2) of this AD. 


Lhorne on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 104 / Monday, June 1, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 30931 

(1) Airplanes identified in Boeing Service 

Bulletin 747–21–2550, dated December 6, 

2013. 

(2) Airplanes identified in paragraph (h)(2) 

of this AD. 

(d) Subject 

Air Transport Association (ATA) of 

America Code 21, Air conditioning. 

(e) Unsafe Condition 

This AD was prompted by reports of very 

high temperatures, near the floor in the aft 

lower lobe cargo compartment. We are 

issuing this AD to prevent overheating of the 

aft lower lobe cargo compartment, where, if 

temperature sensitive cargo is present, the 

release of flammable vapors could result in 

a fire or explosion if exposed to an ignition 

source. 

(f) Compliance 

Comply with this AD within the 

compliance times specified, unless already 

done. 

(g) Installation for Certain Airplanes 

(Interim Action) 

Within 12 months after the effective date 

of this AD, remove the existing markers and 

install tape and new markers in the bulk 

cargo compartment, in accordance with the 

Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing 

Special Attention Service Bulletin 747–21– 

2544, Revision 2, dated December 11, 2014; 

or using a method approved in accordance 

with the procedures specified in paragraph (j) 

of this AD, as applicable. Accomplishing the 

actions specified in paragraph (h) of this AD 

within 12 months after the effective date of 

this AD terminates the requirements of this 

paragraph. 

(h) Installation for All Airplanes 

(Terminating Action) 

Within 60 months after the effective date 

of this AD, install an additional zone 

temperature sensor assembly in the aft cargo 

compartment, as specified in paragraph (h)(1) 

or (h)(2) of this AD, as applicable. Doing this 

action within 12 months after the effective 

date of this AD terminates the requirements 

of paragraph (g) of this AD. 

(1) For airplanes identified in Boeing 

Service Bulletin 747–21–2550, dated 

December 6, 2013: Do the actions in 

accordance with the Accomplishment 

Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 747– 

21–2550, dated December 6, 2013. 

(2) For airplanes having variable numbers 

RC021 and RC573: Do the actions using a 

method approved in accordance with the 

procedures specified in paragraph (j) of this 

AD. 

(i) Credit for Previous Actions 

This paragraph provides credit for 

removing the existing markers and installing 

tape and new markers in the bulk cargo 

compartment, as required by paragraph (g) of 

this AD, if those actions were performed 

before the effective date of this AD using 

Boeing Service Bulletin 747–21–2544, dated 

January 15, 2013; or Boeing Special Attention 

Service Bulletin 747–21–2544, Revision 1, 

dated September 30, 2013. This service 

information is not incorporated by reference 

in this AD. 

(j) Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs) 

(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft 

Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the 

authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if 

requested using the procedures found in 14 

CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, 

send your request to your principal inspector 

or local Flight Standards District Office, as 

appropriate. If sending information directly 

to the manager of the ACO, send it to the 

attention of the person identified in 

paragraph (k)(1) of this AD. Information may 

be emailed to: 9-ANM-Seattle-ACO-AMOCRequests@faa.gov. 

(2) Before using any approved AMOC, 

notify your appropriate principal inspector, 

or lacking a principal inspector, the manager 

of the local flight standards district office/ 

certificate holding district office. 

(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable 

level of safety may be used for any repair 

required by this AD if it is approved by the 

Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization 

Designation Authorization (ODA) that has 

been authorized by the Manager, Seattle 

ACO, to make those findings. For a repair 

method to be approved, the repair must meet 

the certification basis of the airplane, and the 

approval must specifically refer to this AD. 

(4) If the service information contains steps 

that are labeled as Required for Compliance 

(RC), the provisions of paragraphs (j)(4)(i) 

and (j)(4)(ii) apply. 

(i) The steps labeled as RC, including 

substeps under an RC step and any figures 

identified in an RC step, must be done to 

comply with the AD. An AMOC is required 

for any deviations to RC steps, including 

substeps and identified figures. 

(ii) Steps not labeled as RC may be 

deviated from using accepted methods in 

accordance with the operator’s maintenance 

or inspection program without obtaining 

approval of an AMOC, provided the RC steps, 

including substeps and identified figures, can 

still be done as specified, and the airplane 

can be put back in an airworthy condition. 

(k) Related Information 

(1) For more information about this AD 

that is not incorporated by reference, contact 

Susan Monroe, Aerospace Engineer, Cabin 

Safety and Environmental Systems Branch, 

ANM–150S, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., 

Renton, WA; phone: 425–917–6457; fax: 425– 

917–6590; email: susan.l.monroe@faa.gov. 

(2) For service information identified in 

this AD, contact Boeing Commercial 

Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services 

Management, P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H–65, 

Seattle, WA 98124–2207; telephone 206– 

544–5000, extension 1; fax 206–766–5680; 

Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You 

may view this referenced service information 

at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 

1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For 

information on the availability of this 

material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221. 

(l) Material Incorporated by Reference 

(1) The Director of the Federal Register 

approved the incorporation by reference 

(IBR) of the service information listed in this 

paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR 

part 51. 

(2) You must use this service information 

as applicable to do the actions required by 

this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise. 

(i) Boeing Special Attention Service 

Bulletin 747–21–2544, Revision 2, dated 

December 11, 2014. 

(ii) Boeing Special Attention Service 

Bulletin 747–21–2550, dated December 6, 

2013. 

(3) For service information identified in 

this AD, contact Boeing Commercial 

Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services 

Management, P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H–65, 

Seattle, WA 98124–2207; telephone 206– 

544–5000, extension 1; fax 206–766–5680; 

Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. 

(4) You may view this service information 

at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 

1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For 

information on the availability of this 

material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221. 

(5) You may view this service information 

that is incorporated by reference at the 

National Archives and Records 

Administration (NARA). For information on 

the availability of this material at NARA, call 

202–741–6030, or go to: http://

www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html. 

Issued in Renton, Washington, on May 21, 

2015. 

John P. Piccola, Jr., 

Acting Manager, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2015–13018 Filed 5–29–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES 

Food and Drug Administration 

21 CFR Part 876 

[Docket No. FDA–2015–N–1338] 

Medical Devices; GastroenterologyUrology Devices; Classification of the 

Rectal Control System 

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, 

HHS. 

ACTION: Final order. 

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug 

Administration (FDA) is classifying the 

rectal control system into class II 

(special controls). The special controls 

that will apply to the device are 

identified in this order and will be part 

of the codified language for the rectal 

control system’s classification. The 

Agency is classifying the device into 

class II (special controls) in order to 

provide a reasonable assurance of safety 

and effectiveness of the device. 

DATES: This order is effective June 1, 

2015. The classification was applicable 

on February 12, 2015. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Purva Pandya, Center for Devices and 


Lhorne on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES