alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 300
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 300 appear at 64 FR 44431, Aug. 16, 1999, and at 76 FR 59305, Sept. 26, 2011.

§ 300.153 Permit issuance. ( a ) *Acceptance.* Once the Department of State has accepted the conditions and restrictions proposed by the Russian Federation and all fees have been paid, the competent authorities of the Russian Federation will approve the application. The Russian Federation will issue a permit to the vessel owner for each fishing vessel for which it has approved an application. That vessel will thereupon be authorized by the Russian Federation to fish in accordance with the Agreement and the terms and conditions set forth in the permit. The vessel owner is prohibited from transferring the permit to any other vessel or person. Any such transfer, or the sale or other transfer of the vessel, will immediately invalidate the permit. The vessel owner must notify NMFS of any change in the permit application information submitted to NMFS Headquarters under § 300.152 within 7 calendar days of the change.
( b ) *Copies.* The vessel owner and operator must mail a copy of each permit and any conditions and restrictions issued for that vessel by the Russian Federation within 7 calendar days of its receipt to NMFS Headquarters.
( c ) *Validity.* Any permit issued by the Russian Federation with respect to a vessel subject to this subpart will be deemed to be a valid permit only if: ( 1 ) A completed permit application has been forwarded to the competent authorities of the Russian Federation as provided in § 300.152(b)(1).
( 2 ) Such application has been approved and a permit issued by the competent authorities of the Russian Federation as provided in paragraph (a) of this section.
( 3 ) The U.S. Department of State has notified the competent authorities of the Russian Federation that it has accepted the conditions and restrictions as provided in paragraph (a) of this section. The permit will be rendered invalid by: The transfer or sale of the permit specified in paragraph (a) of this section; the failure to submit to NMFS any changes in permit application information as required by paragraph (a) of this section; failure to submit to NMFS any permit copy required by paragraph (b) of this section or any other information or report required by any other provision of this subpart; or the failure to pay required permit fees.
( d ) *Russian-imposed sanctions.* ( 1 ) The Russian Federation will impose appropriate fines, penalties, or forfeitures in accordance with its laws, for violations of its relevant laws or regulations.
( 2 ) In the case of arrest and seizure of a U.S. vessel by Russian authorities, notification will be given promptly through diplomatic channels informing the United States of the facts and actions taken.
( 3 ) The Russian Federation will release U.S. vessels and their crews promptly, subject to the posting of reasonable bond or other security.
( 4 ) The sanctions for violations of limitations or restrictions on fishing operations will be appropriate fines, penalties, forfeitures, or revocations or suspensions of fishing privileges.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the Annual Report of Reddi Brake Supply Corporation (the ACompany@) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael Zwebner, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



Date: September 27, 2005                                            By: /s/ Michael Zwebner

Michael Zwebner

Chief Executive Officer
# EUR-Lex - 11951KN01 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11951KN01

**Treaty establishing the European Coal and Steel Community - Annex I - Definition of the expressions COAL' and STEEL' **

*

*

Treaty establishing the European Coal and Steel Community - Annex I - Definition of the expressions COAL' and STEEL'

1. The expressions coal' and steel' cover the products listed below.

2. In the exercise of its functions in relation to special steels, coke and scrap the Commission shall take account of the special features of production of these materials or of trade in them.

3. The Commission shall exercise its functions in relation to gas coke, and to brown coal other than for the making of briquettes and semi coke, only where this is necessary by reason of appreciable disturbances caused by these products on the market in fuels.

4. The Commission shall take account of the fact that the production of some of the products listed is directly linked with the production of by products which are not listed but whose selling prices may influence those of the principal products.
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5288

To amend the Solid Waste Disposal Act to prohibit a certain requirement

from applying to out-of-State municipal solid waste generated and disposed of within the same bi-State level A metropolitan statistical area.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 7, 1994

Mr. WHEAT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Energy and Commerce

A BILL

To amend the Solid Waste Disposal Act to prohibit a certain

requirement from applying to out-of-State municipal solid

waste generated and disposed of within the same biState level A metropolitan statistical area.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Bi-State Waste Dis5 posal Efficiency Act’’.
2

•HR 5288 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON APPLICATION OF CERTAIN RE2 QUIREMENT TO CERTAIN WASTE.

3 (a) PROHIBITION.—The Solid Waste Disposal Act

4 (42 U.S.C. 6901 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end

5 of subtitle D the following new section:

6 ‘‘SEC. 4011. PROHIBITION ON APPLICATION OF CERTAIN

7 REQUIREMENT TO CERTAIN WASTE.

8 ‘‘Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any re9 quirement in a Federal law that an owner or operator of

10 a landfill or incinerator obtain authorization to receive

11 out-of-State municipal solid waste shall not apply if the

12 out-of-State waste is generated within, and the landfill or

13 incinerator is located within, the same bi-State level A

14 metropolitan statistical area (as defined by the Office of

15 Management and Budget and as listed by the Office of

16 Management and Budget as of the date of the enactment

17 of this section) which contains two contiguous major cities

18 each of which is in a different State.’’.

19 (b) TECHNICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents

20 for subtitle D of such Act is amended by adding at the

21 end the following new item:

‘‘Sec. 4011. Prohibition on application of certain requirement to certain waste.’’.

Æ
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 99-40421

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ARGIE PRUITT,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:98-CR-17-2

--------------------

November 5, 1999

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Argie Pruitt appeals the district court’s denial of his

motion for acquittal in his trial for conspiracy to distribute

marijuana and possession of marijuana with intent to distribute. 

The evidence presented in this case, and reasonable inferences

drawn therefrom, showed that Pruitt was present in a known drug

location at a time when he might not otherwise have been expected

to be present, that he did not express surprise or confusion when

Culps arrived at his house, that he took possession of a box 
No. 99-40421

-2-

containing marijuana and acknowledged that he was aware of its

contents, that he attempted to prevent detection by police by

preventing entry into the premises, and that he was in possession

of a small quantity of marijuana and drug distribution

paraphernalia. Such evidence is sufficient to sustain the jury’s

verdict. See United States v. Espinoza-Seanez, 862 F.2d 526, 536

(5th Cir. 1988); United States v. Gonzalez, 121 F.3d 928, 936

(5th Cir. 1997).

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
# EUR-Lex - 11957A192 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11957A192

**TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN ATOMIC ENERGY COMMUNITY ( E.A.E.C. - EURATOM ), TITLE FIVE - GENERAL PROVISIONS, ARTICLE 192 **

*

*

++++

ARTICLE 192

MEMBER STATES SHALL TAKE ALL APPROPRIATE MEASURES , WHETHER GENERAL OR PARTICULAR , TO ENSURE FULFILMENT OF THE OBLIGATIONS ARISING OUT OF THIS TREATY OR RESULTING FROM ACTION TAKEN BY THE INSTITUTIONS OF THE COMMUNITY . THEY SHALL FACILITATE THE ACHIEVEMENT OF THE COMMUNITY'S TASKS .

THEY SHALL ABSTAIN FROM ANY MEASURE WHICH COULD JEOPARDISE THE ATTAINMENT OF THE OBJECTIVES OF THIS TREATY .
# EUR-Lex - 12004V241 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V241

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART III — THE POLICIES AND FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - TITLE III — INTERNAL POLICIES AND ACTION - CHAPTER III — POLICIES IN OTHER AREAS - Section 7 — Transport - Article III-241 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0107 - 0107 *

Article III-241

1. The imposition by a Member State, in respect of transport operations carried out within the Union, of rates and conditions involving any element of support or protection in the interest of one or more particular undertakings or industries shall be prohibited, unless authorised by a European decision of the Commission.

2. The Commission, acting on its own initiative or on application by a Member State, shall examine the rates and conditions referred to in paragraph 1, taking account in particular of the requirements of an appropriate regional economic policy, the needs of underdeveloped areas and the problems of areas seriously affected by political circumstances on the one hand, and of the effects of such rates and conditions on competition between the different modes of transport on the other.

After consulting each Member State concerned, the Commission shall adopt the necessary European decisions.

3. The prohibition provided for in paragraph 1 shall not apply to tariffs fixed to meet competition.

--------------------------------------------------
Case 16-28482 Doc 7 Filed 09/08/16 Entered 09/09/16 11:28:34 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
Editorial Note on Part 300
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 300 appear at 64 FR 44431, Aug. 16, 1999, and at 76 FR 59305, Sept. 26, 2011.

§ 300.124 Recordkeeping and reporting. ( a ) *Arrival and departure reports.* The operator of each vessel of the United States for which a certificate and permit have been issued under § 300.123 must report by radio to the Port Captain, San Andres Island, voice radio call sign “Capitania de San Andres,” the vessel's arrival in and departure from treaty waters. Radio reports must be made on 8222.0 kHz or 8276.5 kHz between 8:00 a.m. and 12 noon, local time (1300-1700, Greenwich mean time) Monday through Friday.
( b ) *Catch and effort reports.* Each vessel of the United States must report its catch and effort on each trip into treaty waters to the Science and Research Director on a form available from the Science and Research Director. These forms must be submitted to the Science and Research Director so as to be received no later than 7 days after the end of each fishing trip.
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1644/2005

of 7 October 2005         

establishing a prohibition of fishing for herring in ICES zone Vb, VIaN (EC waters), VIb by vessels flying the flag of France

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002 of 20 December 2002 on the conservation and sustainable exploitation of fisheries resources under the common fisheries policy (1), and in particular Article 26(4) thereof,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2847/93 of 12 October 1993 establishing a control system applicable to common fisheries policy (2), and in particular Article 21(3) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Quota exhaustion

The fishing quota allocated to the Member State referred to in the Annex to this Regulation for the stock referred to therein for 2005 shall be deemed to be exhausted from the date set out in that Annex.

Article 2

Prohibitions

Fishing for the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation by vessels flying the flag of or registered in the Member State referred to therein shall be prohibited from the date set out in that Annex. It shall be prohibited to retain on board, tranship or land such stock caught by those vessels after that date.

Article 3

Entry into force

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 7 October 2005.

For the Commission

Jörgen HOLMQUIST            

Director-General for Fisheries and Maritime Affairs

----

(1)OJ L 358, 31.12.2002, p. 59.

(2)OJ L 261, 20.10.1993, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 768/2005 (OJ L 128, 21.5.2005, p. 1).

(3)OJ L 12, 14.1.2005, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1300/2005 (OJ L 207, 10.8.2005, p. 1).

----

ANNEX

----
§ 80.61 What requirements apply to funds for the Recreational Boating Access subprogram? The requirements of this section apply to allocating and obligating funds for the Recreational Boating Access subprogram. ( a ) A State fish and wildlife agency must allocate funds from each annual apportionment under the Dingell-Johnson Sport Fish Restoration Act for use in the subprogram.
( b ) Over each 5-year period, the total allocation for the subprogram in each of the Service's geographic regions must average at least 15 percent of the Sport Fish Restoration funds apportioned to the States in that Region. As long as this requirement is met, an individual State agency may allocate more or less than 15 percent of its annual apportionment in a single Federal fiscal year with the Regional Director's approval.
( c ) The Regional Director calculates Regional allocation averages for separate 5-year periods that coincide with Federal fiscal years 2008-2012, 2013-2017, 2018-2022, and each subsequent 5-year period.
( d ) If the total Regional allocation for a 5-year period is less than 15 percent, the State agencies may, in a memorandum of understanding, agree among themselves which of them will make the additional allocations to eliminate the Regional shortfall.
( e ) This paragraph applies if State fish and wildlife agencies do not agree on which of them will make additional allocations to bring the average Regional allocation to at least 15 percent over a 5-year period. If the agencies do not agree: ( 1 ) The Regional Director may require States in the Region to make changes needed to achieve the minimum 15-percent Regional average before the end of the fifth year; and
( 2 ) The Regional Director must not require a State to increase or decrease its allocation if the State has allocated at least 15 percent over the 5-year period.
( f ) A Federal obligation of these allocated funds must occur by the end of the fourth consecutive Federal fiscal year after the Federal fiscal year in which the funds first became available for allocation.
( g ) If the agency's application to use these funds has not led to a Federal obligation by that time, these allocated funds become available for reapportionment among the State fish and wildlife agencies for the following fiscal year.
§ 22.4 Scope of this part. ( a ) ( 1 ) You can possess or transport within the United States, without a Federal permit: ( i ) Any live or dead bald eagles, or their parts, nests, or eggs that were lawfully acquired before June 8, 1940; and
( ii ) Any live or dead golden eagles, or their parts, nests, or eggs that were lawfully acquired before October 24, 1962.
( 2 ) You may not transport into or out of the United States, import, export, purchase, sell, trade, barter, or offer for purchase, sale, trade, or barter bald or golden eagles, or their parts, nests, or eggs of these lawfully acquired pre-act birds. However, you may transport into or out of the United States any lawfully acquired dead bald or golden eagles, their parts, nests, or dead eagles, if you acquire a permit issued under § 22.60 of this part.
( 3 ) No exemption from any statute or regulation will apply to any offspring of these pre-act birds.
( 4 ) You must mark all shipments containing bald or golden eagles, alive or dead, their parts, nests, or eggs as directed in § 14.81 of this subchapter. The markings must contain the name and address of the person the shipment is going to, the name and address of the person the shipment is coming from, an accurate list of contents by species, and the number of each species.
( b ) The provisions in this part are in addition to, and are not in lieu of, other regulations of this subchapter B which may require a permit or prescribe additional restrictions or conditions for the importation, exportation, and interstate transportation of wildlife (see also part 13 of this subchapter).
[39 FR 1183, Jan. 4, 1974, as amended at 64 FR 50472, Sept. 17, 1999. Redesignated and amended at 87 FR 884, Jan. 7, 2022]
#### § 665.936 International law.

The regulations in this subpart shall be applied in accordance with international law. No restrictions shall apply to or be enforced against a person who is not a citizen, national, or resident alien of the United States (including foreign flag vessels) unless in accordance with international law.
Editorial Note on Part 648
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 648 appear at 62 FR 14651, Mar. 27, 1997.

§ 648.70 Surfclam and ocean quahog Annual Catch Limit (ACL). ( a ) The MAFMC staff shall recommend to the MAFMC ACLs for the surfclam and ocean quahog fisheries, which shall be equal to the ABCs recommended by the SSC. ( 1 ) *Sectors.* The surfclam and ocean quahog ACLs will be established consistent with the guidelines contained in the Atlantic Surfclam and Ocean Quahog FMP. The ACL for ocean quahog will then be allocated to the Maine and non-Maine components of the fishery according to the allocation guidelines of the Atlantic Surfclam and Ocean Quahog FMP as specified in § 648.78(b).
( 2 ) *Periodicity.* The surfclam and ocean quahog ACLs may be established on an annual basis for up to 3 years at a time, dependent on whether the SSC provides single or multiple year ABC recommendations.
( b ) *Performance review.* The MAFMC staff shall conduct a detailed review of the fishery performance relative to the ACLs at least every 5 years. ( 1 ) If the surfclam or the ocean quahog ACL is exceeded with a frequency greater than 25 percent (*i.e.,* more than once in 4 years or any 2 consecutive years), the MAFMC staff will review fishery performance information and make recommendations to the MAFMC for changes in measures intended to ensure the ACL is not exceeded as frequently.
( 2 ) The MAFMC may specify more frequent or more specific ACL performance review criteria as part of a stock rebuilding plan following a determination that a stock has become overfished.
( 3 ) Performance reviews shall not substitute for annual reviews that occur to ascertain if prior year ACLs have been exceeded, but may be conducted in conjunction with such reviews.
[76 FR 60622, Sept. 29, 2011]
#### § 30.2 Disposition of surplus range animals.

Disposition shall be made only during regularly scheduled disposal program periods, except in the event of exigent circumstances affecting the animals, their range, or the recipient. The Refuge Manager is responsible for determining the existence of “exigent circumstances.” Surplus range animals may be disposed of, subject to State and Federal health laws and regulations, by donation for specific purposes to public agencies, public institutions, other governments or charitable institutions, or sold on the open market.

[62 FR 19937, Apr. 24, 1997]
#### § 90.1 General.

Any person having an interest in a crop and who is suffering damage due to depredations by migratory waterfowl may file a complaint and apply for surplus grain for use in feeding programs to augment the natural source of food available to migratory waterfowl to aid in the prevention of crop damage by such birds, as provided for in these regulations.
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

In re: ) Case No. 

)

) Chapter 13 

)

SSN: XXX-XX- Debtors )

To:

ORDER TO EMPLOYER TO PAY THE TRUSTEE 

Attn: Payroll Department 

WHEREAS, the above named debtor has a plan to pay his/her debts out of his/her future earnings,

and by his/her plan submits all of his/her future earnings to the supervision and control of this Court for the

purpose of carrying out the Plan:

NOW IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, that until further order of this Court, ,

employer of , deduct from the earnings of the debtor the sum of $

each month beginning on the next pay day following the receipt of this order and to pay the sum so deducted to ,

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the employer shall stop or change the deduction upon written notice from the

Trustee;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the employer shall notify the Trustee if the employment of the debtor is

terminated and the reason for such termination; 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that all earnings of the debtor, except amounts required to be withheld by the

provisions of Federal or State law or for insurance, pension or union dues, be paid to the debtor and that no

deduction other than authorized or directed by this order be made by the employer. 

Date 

Entered: 

Jeffrey Allsteadt, Clerk, United States Bankruptcy Court 

Attorney Signature ______________________ Date:

Check this box if the debtor has agreed to the entry of this order without further notice or hearing through Section 

I of the Chapter 13 Plan.

 Yashica L Spellman 16-27238

9272

AMENDED

City of Chicago

121 N Clark

Chicago, Il 60602

City of Chicago

 Yashica L Spellman 2,130.00

08/24/2018

steadt, Clerk, United States y Court

8/27/2018

Case 16-27238 Doc 55 Filed 08/27/18 Entered 08/27/18 10:03:41 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
#### John Scheel, an Infant, by Henry Scheel, His Guardian ad Litem, Appellant, *v.*Mutual Milk and Cream Company, Respondent.

(Argued March 5, 1907;

decided April 2, 1907.)

*Scheel*v. *Mutual Milk & Cream Co.,*114 App. Div. 930, affirmed.

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial departinent, entered August 6, 1906, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained through defendant’s negligence.

*565
      *M. 8. Bevins, Frank V. Johnson*and *Jacob O. Brcmd*for appellant.

*It. B. Wood, George Gordon Battle*and *Frederick F. Fishel*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Willard Bartlett, Hiscbox and Chase, JJ.