alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           3,927
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,517
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (46)
<INVENTORY>                                     19,256
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,129
<PP&E>                                          23,412
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (8,195)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  57,278
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,412
<BONDS>                                          4,147
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     31,979
<COMMON>                                       199,019
<OTHER-SE>                                   (199,394)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    57,278
<SALES>                                         48,363
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                50,507
<CGS>                                           27,735
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   45,642
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 191
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,674
<INCOME-TAX>                                       100
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,574
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.24


</TABLE>
§ 80.33 How does an agency decide who to count as paid license holders in the annual certification? ( a ) A State fish and wildlife agency must count only those people who have a license issued: ( 1 ) In the license holder's name; or
( 2 ) With a unique identifier that is traceable to the license holder, who must be verifiable in State records.
( b ) A State fish and wildlife agency must count a person holding a single-year license only once in the certification period in which the license first becomes valid. (Single-year licenses are valid for any length of time less than 2 years.)
( c ) A person is counted as a valid license holder even if the person is not required to have a paid license or is unable to hunt or fish.
( d ) A person having more than one valid hunting license is counted only once each certification period as a hunter. A person having more than one valid fishing license is counted only once each certification period as an angler. A person having both a valid hunting license and a valid fishing license, or a valid combination hunting/fishing license, may be counted once each certification period as a hunter and once each certification period as an angler. The license holder may have voluntarily obtained them or was required to have them in order to obtain a different privilege.
( e ) A person who has a license that allows the license holder only to trap animals or only to engage in commercial fishing or other commercial activities must not be counted.
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 183 (Thursday, September 21, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 55215]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-7833]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

[(MT-922-06)-1310-FI-P; NDM 94458]


Notice of Proposed Reinstatement of Terminated Oil and Gas Lease 
NDM 94458

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Per 30 U.S.C. 188(d), Baldwin Exploration Corp. timely filed a 
petition for reinstatement of oil and gas lease NDM 94458, Mountrail 
County, North Dakota, together with a request for a rental and royalty 
reduction allowed under 43 CFR 3108.2-3(f). The lessee paid the 
required rental at the rate provided in the original lease terms.
    No leases were issued that affect these lands. The lessee paid the 
$500 administration fee for the reinstatement of the lease and $163 
cost for publishing this Notice.
    The lessee met the requirements for reinstatement of the lease per 
Sec. 31 (d) and (e) of the Mineral Leasing Act of 1920 (30 U.S.C. 188). 
We are proposing to reinstate the lease, effective the date of 
termination subject to the original terms and conditions of the lease.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karen L. Johnson, Chief, Fluids 
Adjudication Section, BLM Montana State Office, 5001 Southgate Drive, 
Billings, Montana 59101-4669, Phone (406) 896-5098/Fax (406) 896-5292.

    Dated: September 13, 2006.
Karen L. Johnson,
Chief, Fluids Adjudication Section.
[FR Doc. 06-7833 Filed 9-20-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-$$-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7962

STEVEN E. HESTER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

STEVEN STOWE, F.B.I.; ED RYAN, F.B.I.; PATRICK

MCNARDO, U.S.M.; SCOTT SEWALL, U.S.M.; OFFICER

SWEET, AA County Police; BEN WILSON, B.C.D.C.;

VENABLE, Social Worker, B.C.D.C.,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-95-

2300-AMD)

Submitted: March 12, 1996 Decided: March 21, 1996

Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Steven E. Hester, Appellant Pro Se. Lynne Ann Battaglia, United

States Attorney, Perry F. Sekus, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES

ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing certain Defendants and certain claims from his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988)

action. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the

order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only

over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1988), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1988); Fed. R. Civ.

P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541

(1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an

appealable interlocutory or collateral order.

We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# EUR-Lex - 12004V038 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V038

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART I - TITLE V — EXERCISE OF UNION COMPETENCE - CHAPTER I — COMMON PROVISIONS - Article I-38 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0029 - 0029 *

Article I-38

Principles common to the Union's legal acts

1. Where the Constitution does not specify the type of act to be adopted, the institutions shall select it on a case-by-case basis, in compliance with the applicable procedures and with the principle of proportionality referred to in Article I-11.

2. Legal acts shall state the reasons on which they are based and shall refer to any proposals, initiatives, recommendations, requests or opinions required by the Constitution.

--------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Michael L. Weiner, Chief Executive Officer of Biophan Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company"), certify to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of this
Amendment #1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended August
31, 2006 of the Company, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report, fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                Date: January 24, 2007


                                /s/ Michael L. Weiner
                                ------------------------
                                Michael L. Weiner
                                Chief Executive Officer
Editorial Note on Part 679
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 679 appear at 61 FR 56438, Nov. 1, 1996; 62 FR 2047, Jan. 15, 1997; 66 FR 27909, May 21, 2001; 67 FR 79739, Dec. 30, 2002; and 77 FR 6502, Feb. 8, 2012.

§ 679.3 Relation to other laws. ( a ) *Foreign fishing for groundfish.* Regulations governing U.S. nationals fishing in the Russian fisheries are set forth in part 300 of chapter III of this title.
( b ) *Domestic fishing for groundfish.* ( 1 ) The conservation and management of groundfish in waters of the territorial sea and internal waters of the State of Alaska are governed by the Alaska Administrative Code at 5 AAC Chapter 28 and by the Alaska Statutes at Title 16.
( 2 ) Alaska Administrative Code (5 AAC 39.130) governs reporting and permitting requirements using ADF&G “Intent to Operate” and “Fish Tickets.”
( c ) *Halibut.* Additional regulations governing the conservation and management of halibut are set forth in subpart E of part 300 of chapter III of this title.
( d ) *King and Tanner crabs.* Additional regulations governing conservation and management of king crabs and Tanner crabs in the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Area are contained in 50 CFR part 680 and in Alaska Statutes at A.S. 16 and Alaska Administrative Code at 5 AAC Chapters 34, 35, and 39.
( e ) *Incidental catch of marine mammals.* Regulations governing exemption permits and the recordkeeping and reporting of the incidental take of marine mammals are set forth in § 216.24 and part 229 of this title.
( f ) *Domestic fishing for salmon.* Management of the salmon commercial troll fishery and recreational fishery in the East Area of the Salmon Management Area, defined at § 679.2, is delegated to the State of Alaska. Regulations governing the commercial drift gillnet salmon fishery and recreational salmon fishery in the Cook Inlet EEZ Area, defined at § 679.2, are set forth in subpart J of this part.
( g ) *Scallops.* Additional regulations governing conservation and management of scallops off Alaska are contained in Alaska Statutes A.S. 16 and Alaska Administrative Code at 5 AAC Chapter 38.
[61 FR 31230, June 19, 1996, as amended at 61 FR 35578, July 5, 1996; 62 FR 2045, Jan. 15, 1997; 62 FR 19688, Apr. 23, 1997; 63 FR 38502, July 17, 1998; 63 FR 47356, Sept. 4, 1998; 69 FR 877, Jan. 7, 2004; 70 FR 10232, Mar. 2, 2005; 77 FR 75587, Dec. 21, 2012; 89 FR 34758, Apr. 30, 2024]
#### § 520.1 Purpose.

These regulations implement the provisions of the “Freedom of Information Act,” 5 U.S.C. 552. They establish procedures under which the public may inspect and obtain copies of nonexempt material maintained by the Commission, provide for administrative appeal of initial determinations to deny requests for material, and prescribe uniform fees to be charged by the Commission to recover direct search and duplication costs.
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed May 18, 2022

. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D 2 1

- 7 8 3 Lower Tribunal No. 1 8

- 6 9 2

________________

Giuliana Llanso , Appellant,

vs. SHEDDF2 - FL3, LLC , et c . , Appellee.

A n A ppeal from the Circuit Court for Miami

- Dade County, Carlos Lopez , Judge.
Khullar Law, and Divya Khullar ( Tamarac ) , for appellant. Agentis PLLC, and Christopher B. Spuches and Jason A. Martorella , for appellee.

Before SCAL E S , H E NDON and GO R DO , JJ. PER CURIAM.2 In this lender liability case, appellant Giuliana Llanso, the borrower and plaintiff below , appeals a final summary judgment in favor of appellee SHEDDF2

- FL3, LLC, the lender’s assignee and defendant below. The gravamen of appellant ’s claim is that she and her lender, TotalBank, the predecessor

- in

- interest of appellee, had entered into an enforc eable credit agreement extending the maturity date of her loan. Appellant’s operative complaint asserts that appellee failed to honor the terms of this alleged agreement, resulting in appellant having to pay higher closing costs upon the sale of her reside nce . Specifically, appellant seeks to recover her payments related to a default interest rate considerably higher than the interest rate reflected in the alleged agreement, as well as allegedly excessive attorney’s fees and costs. After its review of the summary judgment evidence, the trial court correctly concluded that, because appellant did not timely comply with the conditions precedent for forming the alleged agreement, a written credit agreement between the parties did not form. S ee Mitchell v. DiMare , 936 So. 2d 1178, 1180 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006) (“A condition precedent is an act or event, other than a lapse of time, that must occur before a binding contract will arise.”). Because a written credit agreement did not form, the trial court also
correct ly determined that the applicable Banking Statute of Frauds precludes3 appellant’s breach of contract action. § 687.0304(2), Fla. Stat. (2017); Bloch v. Wells Fargo Home Mortg. , 755 F.3d 886, 890 (11th Cir. 2014) (“The Banking Statute of Frauds provides tha t a borrower may not maintain an action on an agreement by a creditor to take certain actions, such as entering into a new credit agreement, forbearing from exercising remedies under prior agreements, or extending installments due under prior credit agreem ents, unless the agreement is in writing, expresses consideration, sets forth the relevant terms and conditions, and is signed by the creditor and the debtor.”);

see Metro Bldg. Materials Corp. v. Republic Nat’l Bank of Miam i , 919 So. 2d 595 , 598 (Fla. 3rd DCA 2006). Affirmed.
Editorial Note on Part 660
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 660 appear at 67 FR 65906, Oct. 29, 2002, 88 FR 81358, Nov. 22, 2023.

§ 660.507 Closed areas to reduction fishing. The following areas are closed to reduction fishing: ( a ) *Farallon Islands closure* (see Figure 1 to this subpart). The portion of Subarea A bounded by— ( 1 ) A straight line joining Pigeon Point Light (37°10.9′ N. lat., 122°23.6′ W. long.) and the U.S. navigation light on Southeast Farallon Island (37°42.0′ N. lat., 123°00.1′ W. long.); and
( 2 ) A straight line joining the U.S. navigation light on Southeast Farallon Island (37°42.0′ N. lat., 123°00.1′ W. long.) and the U.S. navigation light on Point Reyes (37°59.7′ N. lat., 123°01.3′ W. long.).
( b ) *Subarea B closures.* Those portions of Subarea B described as— ( 1 ) *Oxnard closure* (see Figure 1 to this subpart). The area that extends offshore 4 miles from the mainland shore between lines running 250° true from the steam plant stack at Manadalay Beach (34°12.4′ N. lat., 119°15.0′ W. long.) and 220° true from the steam plant stack at Ormond Beach (34°07.8′ N. lat., 119°10.0′ W. long.).
( 2 ) *Santa Monica Bay closure* (see Figure 1 to this subpart). Santa Monica Bay shoreward of that line from Malibu Point (34°01.8′ N. lat., 188°40.8′ W. long.) to Rocky Point (Palos Verdes Point) (33°46.5′ N. lat., 118°25.7′ W. long.).
( 3 ) *Los Angeles Harbor closure* (see Figure 1 to this subpart). The area outside Los Angeles Harbor described by a line extending 6 miles 180° true from Point Fermin (33°42.3′ N. lat., 118°17.6′ W. long.) and then to a point located 3 miles offshore on a line 225° true from Huntington Beach Pier (33°39.2′ N. lat., 118°00.3′ W. long.).
( 4 ) *Oceanside to San Diego closure* (see Figure 1 to this subpart). The area 6 miles from the mainland shore south of a line running 225° true from the tip of the outer breakwater (33°12.4′ N. lat., 117°24.1′ W. long.) of Oceanside Harbor to the United States-Mexico International Boundary.
###### Editorial Note on Part 622

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 622 appear at 79 FR 57837, Sept. 26, 2014 and at 81 FR 32253, May 23, 2016.

#### § 622.508 Vessel identification.

See § 622.6 for vessel identification requirements applicable to this subpart.
#### § 20.81 Tagging requirement.

No migratory bird preservation facility shall receive or have in custody any migratory game birds unless such birds are tagged as required by § 20.36.

[41 FR 31537, July 29, 1976]
§ 501.6 Requests for correction or amendment of a record. ( a ) Any individual may request the correction or amendment of a record pertaining to him or her in writing addressed to the Privacy Officer at the Commission offices. Verification of identity required for such requests shall be the same as that specified in § 501.4 of this part with respect to requests for access. Records sought to be amended must be identified with as much specificity as is practicable under the circumstances of the request, and at a minimum, should refer to the system name designated in the Notice of System Records published in the Federal Register, the type of record in which the information thought to be improperly maintained or incorrect is contained, and the precise information that is the subject of the request (for example, system name, description of record, paragraph, sentence, line, words). Assistance in identifying a record, and in otherwise preparing a request, may be obtained by contacting the Privacy Officer at the Commission offices.
( b ) A request should, in addition to identifying the individual and the record sought to be amended or corrected, include: ( 1 ) The specific wording or other information to be deleted, if any;
( 2 ) The specific wording or other information to be inserted, if any, and the exact place in the record at which it is to be inserted, and,
( 3 ) A statement of the basis for the requested amendment or correction (e.g. that the record is inaccurate, unnecessary, irrelevant, untimely, or incomplete), together with supporting documents, if any, which substantiate the statement.
Your session is about to expire.Resume session

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Welcome.Log inorregisterCOPS OFFICE RESOURCE CENTER

HomeCatalogCartOrders

                    

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                CatalogMatches: 1Offline form Recent Popular Online Print OtherCOPS-P138Overcoming Language Barriers: Solutions for Law EnforcementThe purpose of this report is to provide law enforcement agencies with strategies to best ensure language access to the limited English proficient (LEP) populations in their jurisdiction. This publication discusses how law enforcement agencies of different sizes, capacities, and circumstances can begin to address language barriers they encounter through promising practices such as developing a language access policy and plan, cultivating bilingual personnel, and pooling and leveraging resources. Limited hard copies are available from the Vera Institute of Justice.By Susan Shah, Insha Rahman, Anita KhashuCategories: New Immigrant CommunitiesLanguage: EnglishPublic linkhttps://portal.cops.usdoj.gov/resourcecenter?item=cops-p138Click here to see the entire catalog.Cart:Download PDFBook • Mar 2007Search catalogreset title abstract authors contentContaining text: exact phraseNot containing text: exact phraseLanguage:anyEnglishSpanishHmongVietnameseCategory:anyAlternatives to IncarcerationCommunity PartnershipsData and AnalysisEthics and IntegrityFoundations of Community PolicingHiring, Recruitment, and RetentionHomeland SecurityNew Immigrant CommunitiesNonviolent CrimeOtherPolice OperationsPOP Center ResourceSchool and Campus SafetyTechnologyTribalViolent CrimeYouth SafetyPublished after:Published before:Page1

                    

FOIA | No FEAR Act | Open Government | Privacy | Legal|HelpCopyright (C) U.S. Department of Justice, COPS Office, IT Division, 2012 - 2024. All rights reserved.
Rendered on Mon Mar 4 2024 at 05:20 (UTC-5) in 0.89 secEnterprise Framework 3.21.7.7 • Store Controls 3.3.1.7Survey 500303407 Section 60000560 Rules Hints Inactive
#### § 665.468 Seasons.

The fishing year for precious coral begins on July 1 and ends on June 30 the following year.
Editorial Note on Part 622
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 622 appear at 79 FR 57837, Sept. 26, 2014 and at 81 FR 32253, May 23, 2016.

§ 622.513 Prohibited species. The harvest and possession restrictions of this section apply without regard to whether the species is harvested by a vessel operating under a commercial vessel permit. The operator of a vessel that fishes in the EEZ around St. Thomas and St. John is responsible for the limit applicable to that vessel. Any of the following species caught in the EEZ around St. Thomas and St. John must be released immediately with a minimum of harm. ( a ) *Reef fish.* No person may fish for or possess the following reef fish species in or from the EEZ around St. Thomas and St. John. ( 1 ) Goliath grouper or Nassau grouper.
( 2 ) Blue parrotfish, midnight parrotfish, or rainbow parrotfish.
( b ) - ( c ) [Reserved]
( d ) *Coral, sea cucumber, and sea urchin.* A coral, sea cucumber, or sea urchin may not be fished for or possessed in or from the EEZ around St. Thomas and St. John. The taking of coral in the EEZ around St. Thomas and St. John is not considered unlawful possession provided it is returned immediately to the sea in the general area of fishing.
( e ) *Queen conch.* No person may fish for or possess queen conch in or from the EEZ around St. Thomas and St. John.