p. 1



# OAR Box 1477 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



## Document

Number: 

# 35 ) ll-J-2 6 Docket Number: 

# A-94-5 2

Printed 7/31/2008 11:40:24

A M Sheet 35of 36P. 2

it_|*LX4-l-Ul~^i

. 

### ;HmH 5 Jennife rGreenamoye r

05/04/200 0 08:0 7 A M To : Austin.Perez@sba.go v
cc : Keit h Barnett/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA , Peter_D._Eglinton@omb.eop.gov , To m Kelly/DC/USEPA/US@EPA , Stuar t Miles-McLean/DC/USEPA/U S @ EPA , Jonathan.Pawlow@sba.gov , Amand a Aldridge/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA , PennyLassiter/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA , To m Eagles/DC/USEPA/US@EP A
Subject : Plastics : Revise d Table s

I fal l th e Pane l member s agre e I ca n emai l ou t th e ne wtable s t o th e SER s an d follow-u p wit h faxe s t o thos e peopl e tha t mayno t b e able t o rea d th e attachment

. Austin.Perez@sba.go vo n 05/03/200 0 05:29:5 2 P M

Austin.Perez@sba.go vo n 05/03/200 0 05:29:5 2 P M 

# i

JN.^ - To : Keit h Barnett/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA , Peter_D._Eglinton@omb.eop.gov , Jennife rEP AAIP^D°______

_ Greenamoyer/DC/USEPA/US@EPA , To m Kelly/DC/USEPA/US@EPA , Sti l Miles-McLean/DC/USEPA/US@EPA , Jonathan.Pawlow@sba.go v cc : Amand a Aldridge/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA , PennyLassiter/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA , To m

Eagles/DC/USEPA/US@EP A Subject : RE : Revise d Table s fo rSE R Outreac h

Keith , thes e table s loo k great

. Jennifer , Coul d thes e b e faxe d o remaile d t o SERs , a s replacement s ofth e table s no wcontaine d withi n th e SE R outreac h materials ? We'l l probabl ynee d t o includ e a n explanatio n ( a fe wsentence s bu t n o mor e tha n a short paragraph) , perhap s t o th e effec t tha t "th e Pane l jus t discovere d tha t i n it s hast e t o provid e SER s wit h adequat e informatio n early , som e informatio n wa s mistakenl yno t included

. W e apologiz e fo ran y inconvenience. " O rsomethin g lik e that

. Austi n Origina l Message — From : Barnett.Keith@epamail.epa.go v [mailto:Barnett.Keith@epamail.epa.gov ] Sent : Wednesday , May03 , 200 0 3:4 6 P M To : Peter_D._Eglinton@omb.eop.gov ; Greenamoyer.Jennifer@epamail.epa.gov ; Kelly.Tom@epamail.epa.gov ; Miles-McLean.Stuart@epamail.epa.gov ; jonathan.pawlow@sba.gov ; austin.perez@sba.go v Cc : Aldridge.Amanda@epamail.epa.gov; Lassiter.Penny@epamail.epa.gov ; Eagles.To m @ epamail.epa.go v Subject : Revise d Table s fo rSE R Outreac hP. 3

Whe n w e sen t th e SE R outreac h material , I wa s requeste d t o provid e a breakdow n ofth e numbe roffacilitie s affecte d fo rth e cos t effectivenes s tables

. Als o I wa s requeste d t o provid e a summarytabl e fo rne wsource s fo renclosur e A

. (Not e tha t th e ne wsourc e summarytabl e tha t go t pu t i n enclosur e Awa s a draf t tha t wa s ou t o

fdate. ) I hav e attache d th e revise d table s t o thi s message . (Se e attache d file : Revise d Table s 1 an d 2 fo rSE R Meeting.wpd ) Keit h W

. Barnet t U

. S

. Environmenta l Protectio n Agenc y Emissio n Standard s Divisio n MD-1 3 Researc h Triangl e Park , N C 2771 1 

### 919-541-560 5 barnett.keit h @ epa.go v 

### l i s Wm. att l .ht mP. 4

05/03/200 0 05:2 9 PM Austin.Perez@sba.govTo : Keit h Barnett/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA , Peter_D._Eglinton@omb.eop.gov , Jennife r Greenamoyer/DC/USEPA/US@EPA , To m Kelly/DC/USEPA/US@EPA , Stuar t Miles-McLean/DC/USEPA/US@EPA , Jonathan.Pawlow@sba.gov

cc : Amand a Aldridge/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA , Penn y Lassiter/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA , To m Eagles/DC/USEPA/US@EP A Subject : RE : Revised Table s fo rSER Outreac h

Keith , thes e table s loo k great

. Jennifer , Coul d thes e b e faxe d o remaile d t o SERs , a s replacement s o fth e table s no wcontaine d withi n th e SE R outreac h materials ? We'l l probabl ynee d t o includ e a n explanatio n ( a fe wsentence s bu t n o mor e tha n a shor t paragraph) , perhap s t o th e effec t tha t "th e Pane l jus t discovere d tha t i n it s hast e t o provid e SERs wit h adequate informatio n early , som e informatio n wa s mistakenl yno t included

. W e apologiz e fo ran y inconvenience. " O rsomethin g lik e that

. Austi n Origina l Messag e From : Barnett.Keith@epamail.epa.go v [mailto:Barnett.Keith@epamail.epa.gov ] Sent : Wednesday , Ma y03 , 200 0 3:4 6 P M To : Peter_D._Eglinton@omb.eop.gov ; Greenamoyer.Jennifer@epamail.epa.gov ; Kelly.Tom@epamail.epa.gov ; Miles-McLean.Stuart@epamail.epa.gov ; jonathan.pawlow@sba.gov ; austin.perez@sba.go v Cc : Aldridge.Amanda@epamail.epa.gov ; Lassiter.Penny@epamail.epa.gov ; Eagles.Tom@epamail.epa.go v Subject : Revise d Table s fo rSE R Outreac h

Whe n w e sen t th e SE R outreac h material , I wa s requeste d t o provid e a breakdow n o fth e numbe ro ffacilitie s affecte d fo rth e cos t effectivenes s tables

. Als o I wa s requeste d t o provid e a summar ytabl e fo rne wsource s fo renclosur e A

. (Not e tha t th e ne wsourc e summar ytabl e tha t go t pu t i n enclosur e Awa s a draf t tha t wa s ou t o fdate. ) I hav e attache d th e revise d table s t o thi s message . (Se e attache d file : Revise d Table s 1 an d 2 fo rSE R Meeting.wpd ) Keit h W

. Barnet t U

. S

. Environmenta l Protectio n Agenc y Emissio n Standard s Divisio n MD-1 3P. 5

Researc h Triangl e Park , N C 2771 1 919-541-560 5 barnett.keith@epa.go v

•**••"~ K att1.ht m

### TABL E1
. COS T EFFECTIVENES S O FREGULATOR Y ALTERNATIV E2 FO REXISTIN GSOURCE S ** b

Grou p o f Operation s
Ope nMoldin g Close dMoldin g Centrifuga l Castin g Continuou s Laminatio n/ Castin g Polyme r Castin g Pultrusio n SM C Manufacturin g Equipmen t

Cleanin g BM C Manufacturin g /

Mixin g Storag e o f

HA PContainin g Mat'l s Total s for th e Sourc e Category Regulatory Alternativ e 1 (MAC T Floor ) No
. o f Facilitie s Impacte d 31 5 7 7 9 1 0 7 8 3 1 2 2 43 3 34 9 43 3 43 3 Tota l

Cos t ($/yr ) $21,249,47 1 $66,44 6 $319,88 9 $600,76 1 $44,78 8 $190,24 7 $13,64 8 $367,59 9 $531,73 0 $326,13 3 $23,710,71 2 Emissio n

Reductio n (tons/yr ) 7056. 4 0. 0 44. 0 360. 6 0. 0 228. 1 0. 0 807. 1 153. 3 0. 0 8649. 5 Regulatory Alternativ e 2

No
. o f Facilitie s Require dt o mee t Above-the-Floo r Optio n 4 4 0 3 2 0 2 0 0 3 0 5 4 Tota l

Cos t (S/yr ) $31,203,48 1 $66,44 6 $303,12 3 $1,161,82 9 $44,78 8 $814,12 9 $13,64 8 $368,19 6 $1,065,32 7 $326,73 0 $35,367,69 7 Enussio n

Reductio n (tons/yr ) 13625. 2 0. 0 859. 6 580. 8 0. 0 348. 2 0. 0 807. 1 292. 3 0. 0 16513. 2 Incrementa l

Tota l Cos t 

### (S/y O $9,954,01 0 $ 0 ($16,767 ) $561,06 8 $ 0 $623,88 2 $ 0 $59 7 $533,59 7 $59 7 $11,656,98 5 Emissio n

Reductio n (tons/yr ) 6568. 7 0. 0 815. 5 220. 2 0. 0 120. 1 0. 0 0. 0 139. 0 0. 0 7863. 5 Averag e Cos t Effectivenes s ($/ton ) $1,51 5 N/ A ($21 ) $2,54 8 N/ A $5,91 6 N/ A N/ A $3,48 2 N/ A $1,48 2

a

### Thi s table present s cost

effectivenes s value s fo

r group s o f operation s andth e sourc e categor y ifth e proposedrul e require s al l existin g facilitie s wit h uncontrolle dHA

Pemission s greate

r tha nor equa l t o 10 0 tpy to implemen

t the above-the-floo

r contro l optiono

f 95 % contro l fo

r th e following group s o

f operations : ope

nmolding , centrifuga

l casting , continuou s lamination/casting , pultrusion , SM C manufacturing , andBMC manufacturing/mixing

. b 

### The averag e cost

effectivenes s ofth e regulator y optionfo

r eachgroup o

f operation s an dthe sourc e categor y i s determinedusin g th e following formula :

IncrementalCost

Effectiveness (S/ton) Annual Cost of Regulatory Option ($ ) - Annual Cost ofMACT Floor (S ) Emission Reduction of

Regulatory Option (tons) - Emission Reduction ofMACT Floor (tons)

** •

### TABL E2
. COS T EFFECTIVENES S O FREGULATOR Y ALTERNATIV E2 FO RNE WSOURCE S a , b

Grou p o f Operation s

Ope nMoldin g Close dMoldin g Centrifuga l Castin g Continuou s Laminatio n/ Castin g Polyme r Castin g Pultrusio n SM C Manufacturin g Equipmen t

Cleanin g BM C Manufacturin g /

Mixin g Storag e o f

HA PContainin g Mat'l s Total s for th e Sourc e Category Regulatory Alternativ e 1 (MAC T Floor ) No
. o f Facilitie s Impacte d
4 7 1 4 2 4 3 3 1 1 8 4 8 4 8 4 8 4 Tota l

Cos t ($/yr ) $11,118,38 3 $3,39 3 $227,79 4 $178,59 4 $136,37 1 $10,462,12 9 $85,76 9 $59,59 6 $13,480,06 6 $59,09 9 $35,811,19 4 Emissio n

Reductio n (tons/yr ) 277. 2 0. 0 101. 6 215. 7 0. 0 760. 0 7. 3 0. 0 133. 6 0. 0 1495. 4 Regulatory Alternativ e 2 No
. o f Facilitie s require dt o Mee t Above

the-Floo r Optio n 4 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 Tota l

Cos t 

### (S/y O $12,871,25 2 $3,39 3 $250,63 7 $246,53 5 $136,37 1 $10,462,12 9 $85,76 9 $59,64 1 $13,259,15 3 $59,14 4 $37,434,02 4 Emissio n

Reductio n (tons/yr ) 497. 4 0. 0 655. 0 243. 6 0. 0 760. 0 7. 3 0. 0 133. 6 0. 0 2297. 0 Incrementa l

Tota l Cos t (S/yr ) $1,752,86 9 $ 0 $22,84 3 $67,94 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $4 5 ($220,913 ) $4 5 $1,622,83 0 Emissio n

Reductio n (tons/yr ) 220. 2 0. 0 553. 5 27. 9 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 801. 6 Averag e

Cos t Effectivenes s ($/ton ) $7,96 0 N/ A $4 1 $2,43 5 N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A $2,02 4

a

### Thi s table present s cost

effectivenes s value s fo

r group s o f operation s an dthe sourc e categor y ifth e proposedrul e require s al l existin g facilitie s wit h uncontrolle dHA

Pemission s greate

r thano r equa l to 10 0 tp y t o implemen

t th e above-the-floo

r contro l optiono

f 95 % contro l fo

r th e following group s o

f operations : ope

nmolding , centrifuga

l casting , continuou s lamination/casting , pultrusion , SM C manufacturing , andBMC manufacturing/mixing

. b 

### The averag e cost

effectivenes s ofth e regulator y optionfo

r eachgrou p o f operation s andUi

e source categor

y i s detennine dusin g th e following formula :

IncrementalCost

Effectiveness (S/ton) Annual Cost of Regulatory Option ($ ) - Annual Cost ofMACT Floor (S ) Emission Reduction of

Regulatory Option (tons) - Emission Reduction ofMACT Floor (tons)

u

### Summar y o f Estimate dCost s for

Projecte dNe w Facilitie s

Subcategory

Ope nMoldin g Close dMoldin g Centrifugal Castin g Continuou s Polyme r Castin g Pultrusio n SM C Manufacturin g Cleanin g Operation s BMC/Mixin g Storag e o f

HA P
Total s for Plasti c Numbe r o f Projecte d Ne w Growth Facilitie s

4 7 1 4 2 4 3 3 1 1 8 4 84 84
8 4 Total

Resin/G C SMC/BM C (tpy )

3,09 7 3,43 9 3,40 1 130,104 18,77 8 30,23 7 64 1 N/ A 7,26 0 N/ A 72,60 3 Estimate dTota l Cost s for Projecte dNe w GrowthFacilitie s Regulatory Optio n1 (MAC T Floor ) TC C (S/yr) $39,369,28 3 $1,36 1 $73,13 6 $606,71 5 $55,68 8 $50,377,16 0 $417,02 4 $43,12 8 $65,246,24 5 $42,75 9 $156,232,49 9 AC V (S/yr ) $2,630,30 2 $ 0 $212,46 5 $62,46 2 $ 0 $2,296,48 4 $18,10 0 $ 0 $2,491,68 8 $ 0 $7,740,65 1 AC F

(S/yr ) $8,488,08 1 $3,39 3 $15,32 9 $116,13 3 $136,37 1 $8,136,49 6 $67,69 9 $59,59 6 $10,988,37 7 $59,09 9 $28,070,54 3 Regulator y Optio n2 TC C (S/yr) $49,894,05 4 $1,36 1 $782,78 1 $904,50 3 $55,68 8 $50,377,16 0 $417,02 4 $43,12 8 $64,447,33 4 $42,75 9 $166,965,79 3 AC V ($/yr ) $2,757,38 9 $ 0 $91,58 9 $95,70 0 $ 0 $2,235,63 3 $18,10 0 $ 0 $2,440,84 7 $ 0 $7,729,25 8 AC F

($/yr ) $10,113,86 4 $3,39 3 $159,04 8 $150,83 4 $136,37 1 $8,136,49 6 $67,66 9 $59,64 1 $10,818,30 7 $59,14 4 $29,704,76 6 Regulator y Optio n3 TC C ($/yr ) $245,598,47 7 $1,36 1 $1,270,51 2 $965,09 0 $55,68 8 $49,649,83 4 $421,29 0 $43,12 8 $34,800,78 6 $42,75 9 $332,84834 9 AC V ($/yr ) $9,866,45 1 $ 0 $75,14 3 $106,95 8 $ 0 $2,247,73 7 $18,82 6 $ 0 $608,31 9 $ 0 $12,923,43 5 AC Ffa/ ($/yr ) T
$40,0!%65 1 $3,39 3 $260,95 4 $170,70 8 $136,37 1 $7,976,54 7 $68,65 0 $60,22 5 $4,513,96 4 $59,72 8 $53,340,19 2