alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 181 / Tuesday, September 19, 2006 / Presidential Documents 54885 

Proclamation 8050 of September 14, 2006 

Constitution Day and Citizenship Day, Constitution Week, 

2006 

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation 

Americans are united by the principles embodied in the United States Constitution. On Constitution Day and Citizenship Day and during Constitution 

Week, we celebrate the establishment of the United States Constitution and 

honor the Framers of this groundbreaking document. 

In 1787, the Framers of the Constitution met in Philadelphia and drafted 

a document that continues to be the foundation of our Nation’s identity. 

The Constitution established the enduring governmental framework in which 

our free society has flourished for more than two centuries, and it is a 

testament to the wisdom and foresight of our Founders. 

America is grateful to those who have worked to defend the Constitution 

and promote its ideals. During this observance, we also recognize the profound impact our Constitution has on the everyday lives of our citizens, 

and we call upon all Americans to help uphold its values of a free and 

just society. 

In celebration of the signing of the Constitution and in recognition of the 

Americans who strive to uphold the duties and responsibilities of citizenship, 

the Congress, by joint resolution of February 29, 1952 (36 U.S.C. 106, as 

amended), designated September 17 as ‘‘Constitution Day and Citizenship 

Day,’’ and by joint resolution of August 2, 1956 (36 U.S.C. 108, as amended), 

requested that the President proclaim the week beginning September 17 

and ending September 23 of each year as ‘‘Constitution Week.’’ 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States 

of America, do hereby proclaim September 17, 2006, as Constitution Day 

and Citizenship Day, and September 17 through September 23, 2006, as 

Constitution Week. I encourage Federal, State, and local officials, as well 

as leaders of civic, social, and educational organizations, to conduct ceremonies and programs that celebrate our Constitution and reaffirm our rights 

and responsibilities as citizens of our great Nation. 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with FRD1
54886 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 181 / Tuesday, September 19, 2006 / Presidential Documents 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this fourteenth day 

of September, in the year of our Lord two thousand six, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-first. 

[FR Doc. 06–07859 

Filed 9–18–06; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 3195–01–P 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with FRD1GWBOLD.EPS</GPH>
OSLDPS Information Bulletin

No. 28 February 16, 2001

TO: All State Administrative Agency Heads

All State Administrative Agency Points of Contact

FROM: C.H. “Butch” Straub, II

Director

SUBJECT: Pending Enhancements to the On-Line Data Collection Tool 

With the assessment process well underway in most states, the Office for State and Local

Domestic Preparedness Support (OSLDPS) has been working with the OJP Information

Resources Management Division (IRMD) to develop and implement additional features within the

On-Line Data Collection Tool. These new features are intended to assist states in using their

assessment data to develop the required Three-Year Statewide Domestic Preparedness Strategies. 

Planned enhancements include a data analysis capability and a Jurisdiction Prioritization Tool.

The data analysis capability is intended to give states considerable flexibility in how they can view

and use the data being collected in the On-Line Data Collection Tool. A link will be added within

the State Level Data Entry Module that will allow each State Administrative Agency (SAA) to

run a standard set of comparative queries on their state’s data. Through this link, each SAA will

also have the ability to design their own unique queries. This data analysis capability is being

designed with the latest ORACLE DiscovererTM technology, and is being provided to the states at

no cost. 

The second planned enhancement, the Jurisdiction Prioritization Tool, will provide states with the

ability to select specific criteria and weighting factors and use this information to compare and

contrast local jurisdictions using the data captured in the On-Line Data Collection Tool. This

capability will also be available to SAA users through a new link within the State Level Data

Entry Module.

Both the data analysis capability and the Jurisdiction Prioritization Tool should be available in

early March. Additional information, including a job aid to help orient users to the new

capabilities, will be provided at that time. In the interim, for technical assistance with existing

elements of the On-Line Data Collection Tool, you may contact the OJP toll-free help line at 

1-888-549-9901. Assistance with the public health assessment may be obtained by calling the

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention help line at 1-800-747-7649. You may also contact

your OSLDPS program manager for additional information and assistance related to conduct of

the needs assessment and development of your three-year state strategy.
June 18, 2015

Mr. Tim Lehman

1722 Moorland Lane Crystal City, IL 60014

Mr. Tim Lehman:

This is in response to your February 24, 2015, letter sent to the docket (No. FAA-2015-0467) petitioning the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) for an exemption from Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). You request ed to operate a drone for aerial photography.

The information you submitted did not comply with the requirements of 14 CFR 11.81. On March 31, 2015, the FAA sent you a letter stating that we were unable to process your request without further information. Specifica lly, we asked you to provide the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief and the extent of the relief you seek.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

On May 12, 2015, the FAA received additional information. The FAA has reviewed the information and finds that you did not provide the sections from which you seek relief, why granting the request would be in the public interest, and reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety.2 Because your petition lacks sufficient information to proceed, the FAA has closed your exemption request. Should you wish to provide the additional information please resubmit your petition for exemption to the public docket.

Sincerely,

/s/ Brenda D. Courtney Acting Director Office of Rulemaking
II

Calendar No. 489

103D CONGRESS

2ND SESSION H. R. 572

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

AUGUST 4 (legislative day, JUNE 30), 1993

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

JUNE 23 (legislative day, JUNE 7), 1994

Reported by Mr. BIDEN, without amendment

AN ACT

For the relief of Melissa Johnson.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PAYMENT FOR THE BENEFIT OF CLAIMANT.

4 The Secretary of the Treasury shall pay, out of any

5 money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated,

6 $125,000 to Melissa Johnson of Barryville, New York.

7 Such sum shall be in full and complete settlement of all

8 claims against the United States arising out of the per9 sonal injuries and mental pain and suffering incurred as

10 a result of the sexual assault and molestation of Melissa
2

•HR 572 RS

1 Johnson by an employee of the United States Postal Serv2 ice on June 3, 1982, and various other dates.

3 SEC. 2. DEPOSIT OF AMOUNT IN TRUST ACCOUNTS.

4 Barbara Johnson Lizzi of Barryville, New York, the

5 mother of Melissa Johnson, shall deposit the sum paid

6 under section 1 in a federally insured depository institu7 tion in an interest bearing account or accounts in trust

8 for Melissa Johnson. Barbara Johnson Lizzi shall serve

9 as sole trustee of such account or accounts and, as such

10 trustee—

11 (1) shall pay those debts and obligations which

12 are outstanding at the time the sum is paid under

13 section 1 to the extent those debts and obligations

14 arise from the injuries and pain and suffering de15 scribed in section 1;

16 (2) shall, until Melissa Johnson reaches the age

17 of majority under the laws of the State in which Me18 lissa Johnson is residing at the time, pay, from the

19 amounts in the trust account or accounts, expenses

20 incurred for Melissa Johnson’s medical care and

21 education; and

22 (3) shall, when Melissa Johnson reaches the age

23 of majority under the laws of the State in which Me24 lissa Johnson is residing at the time, pay to Melissa
3

•HR 572 RS

1 Johnson all amounts remaining in the trust account

2 or accounts.

3 SEC. 3. LIMITATION ON ATTORNEYS’ FEES.

4 Not more than 10 percent of the amount appro5 priated by section 1 may be paid or delivered to or received

6 by any agent or attorney on account of services rendered

7 in connection with the claim described in section 1, not8 withstanding any contract which provides otherwise. Any

9 person who violates the provisions of this section shall be

10 guilty of an infraction and shall be subject to a fine in

11 the amount provided in title 18, United States Code.

Passed the House of Representatives August 3,

1993.

Attest: DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

Clerk.
Calendar No. 489

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 572

AN ACT

For the relief of Melissa Johnson.

JUNE 23 (legislative day, JUNE 7), 1994

Reported without amendment
EXHIBIT 32


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63
OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE

as adopted pursuant to

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      I,  Ronald  D. Sloan, the chief executive  officer  and  chief  financial
officer of Can-Cal  Resources  Ltd.,  certify  that (i) the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2007,  as filed by the Company with
the  Securities  and  Exchange Commission, to which this  Certification  is  an
Exhibit,  fully  complies  with  the  requirements  of  Section  13(a)  of  the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (ii) the information contained
in the Form 10-QSB  financial  statements  fairly  presents,  in  all  material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of  Can-Cal
Resources Ltd.



                                           /s/  Ronald D. Sloan
					   --------------------
                                           Ronald D. Sloan,
                                           President, Chief Executive Officer
                                           and Chief Financial Officer

                                           Date:  May 14, 2007


This  certification  accompanies  this  Report  pursuant  to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by  the  Company  for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original  of  this  written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Can-Cal Resources  Ltd.  and  will be retained by Can-Cal Resources
Ltd. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission or its staff upon
request.
# EUR-Lex - 12004V224 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V224

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART III — THE POLICIES AND FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - TITLE III — INTERNAL POLICIES AND ACTION - CHAPTER III — POLICIES IN OTHER AREAS - Section 3 — Economic, social and territorial cohesion - Article III-224 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0099 - 0099 *

Article III-224

European laws shall establish implementing measures relating to the European Regional Development Fund. Such laws shall be adopted after consultation of the Committee of the Regions and the Economic and Social Committee.

With regard to the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund, Guidance Section, and the European Social Fund, Articles III-231 and III-219(3) respectively shall apply.

--------------------------------------------------
Hillsborough,

No. 4762.

#### Violet M. Senter *& a. v.*Robert P MacLeod *& a.*

Argued September 2, 1959.

Decided October 6, 1959.

*259*Morris D. Stein*(by brief and orally), for the plaintiffs.

*McLaughlin & Enright {Mr. McLaughlin*orally), for the defendants.

Blandin, J.

The parties agree that the sole issue is “whether or not Clyde R. Senter’s death arose out of and in the course of his employment,” so that the plaintiffs are entitled to compensation under RSA ch. 281, as amended by Laws 1957, *c.*187.

It appears that at the time of his decease on August 16, 1957, Senter, husband of the plaintiff Violet M. Senter, and father of the plaintiff James P. Senter, was employed in the welding shop of the defendant MacLeod Company. There was testimony that on Sunday, August 4, 1957, on a day when he was not working for the defendant and some two weeks before his death, Senter broke a gallon jug of carbon tetrachloride in his cellar where he had gone to clean his own paint brushes. Shortly thereafter he became dizzy, lay down near where the carbon tetrachloride was spilled and slept for an hour or two. The next day he was taken ill, became nauseated and continued so until his death. On August 14, he was taken to the hospital where he died two days later.

His own physician testified that the cause of Senter’s death was “over-inhalation of carbon tetrachloride” causing death due to kidney damage. He further gave the opinion that only a heavy or acute exposure, such as the deceased received in his cellar, would *260cause such a death, and that a gradual or moderate exposure, such as could be found to have occurred in the course of the decedent’s work, would not cause death from kidney damage, but would rather cause a non-fatal damage to the liver.

Considering the record as a whole the Trial Court’s finding that any use of carbon tetrachloride by Senter in connection with his work for the defendant company was not “the cause or a concurring cause” of his death was warranted. So too, was the Court’s further finding that his use of carbon tetrachloride in his own cellar had nothing to do with his employment. While other conclusions might perhaps have been drawn from the evidence they were not compelled and the plaintiffs’ exceptions to the dismissal of their appeal, to the denial of their motions that a decree be •entered for them notwithstanding, and for a new trial are overruled. The order is

*Appeal dismissed.*

All concurred.
**Upcoming Events**
*2000 Annual Meeting of the National Criminal Justice AssociationJuly 8-11, 2000Kansas City, Missouri
National Organization of Black Law Enforcement Executives 24th Annual Training ConferenceJuly 9-13, 2000Biloxi, Mississippi
National Conference of State Legislatures 2000 Annual Meeting and ExhibitJuly 15-19, 2000Chicago, Illinois

Electronic versions are available from the NIJ Web site or the NCJRS Web site.
To order a print copy, contact the National Criminal Justice Reference Service at 1-800-851-3420, P.O. Box 6000, Rockville, MD 20849-6000

PreviousMainNext
The NIJ Research Review - Volume 1, Issue 2 - May 2000*
#### § 32.7199 Content of accounts.

The Operating Tax accounts shall include the taxes arising from the central operations of the company.
# EUR-Lex - 12004V140 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V140

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART III — THE POLICIES AND FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - TITLE III — INTERNAL POLICIES AND ACTION - CHAPTER I — INTERNAL MARKET - Section 2 — Free movement of persons and services - Subsection 2 — Freedom of establishment - Article III-140 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0062 - 0062 *

Article III-140

1. This Subsection and measures adopted in pursuance thereof shall not prejudice the applicability of provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States providing for special treatment for foreign nationals on grounds of public policy, public security or public health.

2. European framework laws shall coordinate the national provisions referred to in paragraph 1.

--------------------------------------------------
#### § 80.37 May the State fish and wildlife agency certify a license sold at a discount when combined with another license or privilege?

Yes. A State fish and wildlife agency may certify a license that is sold at a discount when combined with another license or privilege as long as the agency meets the rules for minimum revenue at § 80.34 for each privilege.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

# Time and Date:

10 a.m., Thursday, January 26, 2006.

# Place:

The Richard V. Backley Hearing Room, 9th Floor, 601 New Jersey Avenue, NW., Washington, DC.

# Status:

Open.

# Matters To be Considered:

                        The Commission will hear oral argument on the matter                         *Secretary of Labor*                         v.                         *Sedgman*, Docket Nos. SE 2002-11, SE 2003-69, and SE 2003-189. (Issues include whether the Administrative Law Judge properly concluded that Sedgman violated 39 CFR 77.200; whether the judge properly held that the Secretary of Labor did not abuse her discretion in citing Sedgman for violations of 30 CFR 77.200 and 77.1710(g); whether the judge properly followed the statutory penalty criteria set forth at 30 U.S.C. 820(i) in setting a penalty for the section 77.200 violation; and whether the judge was correct in deciding to vacate the penalty he assessed for the section 77.200 violation because there was an unreasonable delay by the Secretary in proposing the penalty.)                    

Any person attending this oral argument who requires special accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those needs, subject to 29 CFR 2706.150(a)(3) and 2706.160(d).

# Contact Person For More Info:

Jean Ellen, (202) 434-9950 / (202) 708-9300 for TDD Relay / 1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

Jean H. Ellen,

Chief Docket Clerk.

[FR Doc. 06-802  Filed 1-24-06; 1:23 pm]

BILLING CODE 6735-01-M
§ 86.18 How can I ensure that a BIG-funded facility continues to serve its intended purpose for its useful life? ( a ) When you design and build your BIG-funded facility, you must consider the features, location, materials, and technology in reference to the geological, geographic, and climatic factors that may have an impact on its useful life.
( b ) You must record the Federal interest in real property that includes a BIG-funded capital improvement according to the assurances required in the grant application and guidance from the Regional WSFR Office.
( c ) If we direct you to do so, you must require that subgrantees record the Federal interest in real property that includes a BIG-funded capital improvement.
( d ) If we do not direct you to act as required by paragraph (c) of this section, you may require subgrantees to record the Federal interest in real property that includes a BIG-funded capital improvement.
( e ) You must state in your subaward that subgrantees must not alter the ownership, purpose, or use of the BIG-funded facility as described in the project statement without the approval of you and the WSFR Regional Office.
( f ) You may impose other requirements on subgrantees, as allowed by law, to reduce State liability for the BIG-funded facility. Examples are insurance, deed restrictions, and a security interest agreement, which uses subgrantee assets to secure performance under the grant.
**Exhibit
      32.2**











**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Annual Report of T Bay Holdings, Inc. a Nevada corporation
      (the “Company”), on Form 10-KSB for the annual period ending March 31, 2006 as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Murry Zuhe
      Xiao, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my
      knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.









Date:July 13,2006
            By: /s/ Murry Zuhe XiaoMurry Zuhe XiaoChief Financial Officer
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JU LY 10, 2014

NO. 03

- 11

- 00345

- CR

Wesley Schaefer, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 22ND DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, GO ODWIN, AND FIELD

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

This is an appeal from the judgments of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed

the record and the p arties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the

trial court’s judgments of conviction . Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgments of

conviction

. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudica tion of costs

is made.