alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Background Summary Data for Agricultural Uses of FGD Gypsum (EPA 530-F-08-009)

Table 1: Comparing Trace Constituents in FGD and Mined Gypsums to National Background Levels 

Trace Constituent FGD Gypsum 

(ppm) 

Mined Gypsum 

(ppm) 

National Background Soil Levels 

(ppm)a

Antimony 2.0 – 9.1 0.02 – 0.28 <1 – 8.8 

Arsenic 0.6 – 4.0 0.19 – 3.0 <0.1 - 97 

Cadmium 0.2 – 1.2 All <2 0.05 – 8.2 

Chromium 1.3 – 42.0 8.7 – 30.5 1 – 2,000 

Copper 1.2 – 27.9 <4 – 29.8 <1 - 700 

Lead 0.8 – 12.0 All <5 <10 - 700 

Lithium <9 and 48.8b <9 – 13.1 <5 – 140 

Mercury 0.01 – 1.4 0.00044 – 0.025 <0.01 – 4.6 

Molybdenum 0.5 – 12.0 All <3 <3 – 15 

Nickel 0.73 – 20.1 <4 – 11.9 <5 – 700 

Selenium 2.0 – 30.0 11.3 – 21.1 <0.1 – 4.3 

Thallium 0.6 – 2.3 All <15 0.02 – 1.6 

Vanadium <1 – 73.2 <2 – 12.7 <7 – 500 

Zinc 3.4 – 47.5 13.1 – 27.5 <5 – 2,900 

a

 All background soil data drawn from USGS (2005) 

b

 Only two samples were available 

Sources: Ladwig (2007), OSU (2006), Schroeder (2007), USEPA (2008), USGS (2005) 

Table 2: Selected macro- and micronutrients and minerals of note 

Constituent FGD Gypsum 

(% by weight) 

Mined Gypsum

(% by weight)

Boron <0.0003 – 0.0042 Not available 

Calcium 18.5 – 24.3 18.1 – 21.3 

Iron 0.026 – 0.3 0.038 – 0.74 

Magnesium 0.010 – 0.74 0.1 – 3.14 

Phosphorus 0.0005 – 0.05 0.35 – 0.046 

Potassium <0.004 – 0.09 0.0076 – 0.44 

Silicon 0.022 – 69.2 Not available 

Sodium 0.023 – 5.8 0.35 – 0.076 

Sulfur 14.9 – 20.9 12.3 – 17 

Sources: Ladwig (2007), OSU (2006), Schroeder (2007) 

Sources: 

Ladwig, Ken (2007) Electric Power Research Institute. Personal communication. 

OSU (2006) Ohio State University Extension Fact Sheet "Gypsum for Agricultural Use in Ohio--Sources and 

Quality of Available Products." one datapoint for assessed constituents. ANR-20-05. Downloaded 8/2007 at 

http://ohioline.osu.edu/anr-fact/0020.html. 

Schroeder, Karl (2007) US Department of Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory. July 2007. Personal 

communication. 

USEPA (2008) - Characterization of Coal Combustion Residues from Electric Utilities Using Wet Scrubbers for 

Multi-Pollutant Control. Office of Research & Development. July. EPA/600/R-08/077. Available at 

http://www.epa.gov/nrmrl/pubs/600r08077/600r08077.htm 

USGS. 2005. Major- and Trace-Element Concentrations in Soils from Two Continental-Scale Transects of the 

United States and Canada. Open-File Report 2005-1253. Accessed on September 13, 2007. 

http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2005/1253/.
Editorial Note on Part 660
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 660 appear at 67 FR 65906, Oct. 29, 2002, 88 FR 81358, Nov. 22, 2023.

§ 660.506 Gear restrictions. The only fishing gear authorized for use in the reduction fishery for northern anchovy off California are round haul nets that have a minimum wet-stretch mesh size of 10 ⁄ 16 of an inch (1.59 cm) excluding the bag portion of a purse seine. The bag portion must be constructed as a single unit and must not exceed a rectangular area, adjacent to 20 percent of the total corkline of the purse seine. Minimum mesh size requirements are met if a stainless steel wedge can be passed with only thumb pressure through 16 of 20 sets of 2 meshes each of wet mesh. The wedges used to measure trawl mesh size are made of 20 gauge stainless steel and will be no wider than 10 ⁄ 16 of an inch (1.59 cm) less one thickness of the metal at the widest part.
exv10w11



 





Exhibit 10.11




March 16, 2007




Larry Spanley




Dear Larry:




          [Introductory language regarding 2006 bonus results omitted. The Company undertakes to
furnish a supplemental copy of such language to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon
request.]




          The bonus plan for 2007 has been adjusted to reflect the goals for our company this coming
year. Your bonus is based on the profit after-tax using a standard corporate tax rate.




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	15%

	 	of your cumulative salary if the company achieves an after-tax profit of
	 	$	750,000	 
	22.5%

	 	of your cumulative salary if the company achieves an after-tax profit of
	 	$	1,500,000	 
	30%

	 	of your cumulative salary if the company achieves an after-tax profit of
	 	$	2,500,000	 
	37.5%

	 	of your cumulative salary if the company achieves an after-tax profit of
	 	$	3,500,000	 
	50%

	 	of your cumulative salary if the company achieves an after-tax profit of
	 	$	5,000,000	 
	62.5%

	 	of your cumulative salary if the company achieves an after-tax profit of
	 	$	6,500,000	 
	75%

	 	of your cumulative salary if the company achieves an after-tax profit of
	 	$	8,000,000	 






          In addition, you will earn 12.5% of your cumulative salary if, in my opinion, you have met the
criteria outlined in a document to be provided to you separately.




          The bonus period will be the fiscal months of February 2007 through January 2008. You must be
an active employee of Bakers Footwear Group at the time the bonus is paid to be eligible to receive
your bonus.




          We are excited about the challenges and prospects in the coming year. We hope it is
profitable for all of our shareholders and us.




	 	 	 	 	 
	 	Sincerely,

 	 
	 	/s/ Peter Edison

 	 
	 	Peter Edison 	 
	 	 	 
	 



ss
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference, in the Registration Statement 
(Form S-8 No. 33-81057) pertaining to the 1991 Stock Option Plan of Plasma & 
Materials Technologies, Inc. of our report dated March 20, 1998, with respect to
the consolidated financial statements of Trikon Technologies, Inc. included in 
the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Trikon Technologies, Inc. for the year ended 
December 31, 1997.

                                        /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Woodland Hills, California
April 3, 1998
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration 

          - 14 CFR Parts 21 and 91 
          - [Docket No. FAA-2003-14825; Amendment No. 21-88, 91-293] 
          - RIN 2120-AH90 

# AGENCY:

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. 

# ACTION:

Final rule; correction. 

# SUMMARY:

                        This document makes a correction to the final rule published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on September 1, 2006 (71 FR 52250), which amends regulations for issuing airworthiness certificates to certain new aircraft manufactured in the United States. This action is necessary to add an amendment number to the headings section at the beginning of the final rule. This correction does not make substantive changes to the final rule.                     

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         October 2, 2006.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dan Hayworth, Airworthiness Certification Branch, AIR-230, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591, telephone (202) 267-8449. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Background 

The September 1, 2006, final rule (71 FR 52250) inadvertently failed to include in the headings section at the beginning of the rule an amendment number for the change to 14 CFR part 91. Amendment numbers are a means by which the FAA keeps track of changes to its regulations. The final rule included an amendment number for the changes to 14 CFR part 21 (No. 21-88), but not for part 91. For this reason, we are adding amendment number 91-293 to the headings section at the beginning of the rule. 

### Correction 

In final rule FR Doc. 06-7355, beginning on page 52250 in the issue of September 1, 2006, make the following correction in the headings section. On page 52250 in the first column, change the agency docket information to read as follows: 

“[Docket No. FAA-2003-14825; Amendment Nos. 21-88, 91-293]” 

Issued in Washington, DC, on September 11, 2006. 

Ida M. Klepper, 

Acting Director, Office of Rulemaking. 

[FR Doc. 06-8234 Filed 9-25-06; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
From: Jacquelyn Lopez

To: Heather Filemyr; Jonathan Peterson

Cc: Robert Knop; Rachel Jacobs

Subject: RE: AO 2022-21 (DSCC et. al) request for supplemental information

Date: Wednesday, October 19, 2022 8:18:43 PM

Hi Heather,

On 1 – No, the type of communications described in solicitation 1 will not promote, attack, support,

or oppose the featured candidate or another candidate.

On 2 – We still do not have scripts, confirmed.

Thank you!

Jackie

Jacquelyn (“Jackie”) Lopez

Elias Law Group LLP

Partner

10 G St NE Ste 600

Washington DC 20002

202-968-4514

jlopez@elias.law

CONFIDENTIAL: This email may contain privileged or confidential information and is for the sole use of the intended

recipient(s). Any unauthorized use or disclosure of this communication is prohibited. If you believe that you have received

this email in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete it from your system

From: Heather Filemyr < > 

Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2022 2:28 PM

To: Jacquelyn Lopez <jlopez@elias.law>; Jonathan Peterson <jpeterson@elias.law>

Cc: Robert Knop < >

Subject: AO 2022-21 (DSCC et. al) request for supplemental information

Dear Ms. Lopez and Mr. Peterson:

Commissioners would like you to provide the following supplemental information about your

request:

1. Would “Solicitation 1” communications promote, attack, support, or oppose the featured

candidate or another candidate?

2. Do you have sample scripts for the proposed communications? It is my understanding

that you did not have scripts when we discussed this request previously, but

Commissioners would like us to confirm that is still the case.

You response to this email may be considered a supplement to the advisory opinion request

and posted on the Commission’s website.

Thank you,
Heather Filemyr

Attorney

Federal Election Commission
§ 253.18 Closing. ( a ) *Approval in principle letters.* Every closing will be in strict accordance with a final approval in principle letter.
( b ) *Contracts.* Promissory notes, security documents, and any other documents the Program may require will be on standard Program forms that may not be altered without Program written approval. The Program will ordinarily prepare all contracts, except certain pledges involving real property or other matters involving local law, which will be prepared by each obligor's attorney at the direction and approval of the Program.
( c ) *Additional requirements.* At its discretion the Program may require services from applicant's attorneys, other contractors or agents. Real property services required from an applicant's attorney or agent may include, but are not limited to: Title search, title insurance, mortgage and other document preparation, document execution and recording, escrow and disbursement, and legal opinions and other assurances. The Program will notify the applicant in advance if any such services are required of the applicant's attorneys, contractors or other agents. Applicants are responsible for all attorney's fees, as well as those of any other private contractor. Attorneys and other contractors must be satisfactory to the Program.
( d ) *Closing schedules.* The Program will not be liable for adverse interest-rate fluctuations, loss of commitments, or other consequences of an inability by any of the parties to meet the closing schedule.
# EUR-Lex - 12002E192 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 12002E192

**Treaty establishing the European Community (Nice consolidated version) - Part Five: Institutions of the Community - Title I: Provisions governing the institutions - Chapter 1: The institutions - Section 1: The European Parliament - Article 192 - Article 138b - EC Treaty (Maastricht consolidated version) - **

*
Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0115 - 0115 Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0261 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0056 - Consolidated version *

Treaty establishing the European Community (Nice consolidated version)

Part Five: Institutions of the Community

Title I: Provisions governing the institutions

Chapter 1: The institutions

Section 1: The European Parliament

Article 192

Article 138b - EC Treaty (Maastricht consolidated version)

Article 192

In so far as provided in this Treaty, the European Parliament shall participate in the process leading up to the adoption of Community acts by exercising its powers under the procedures laid down in Articles 251 and 252 and by giving its assent or delivering advisory opinions.

The European Parliament may, acting by a majority of its Members, request the Commission to submit any appropriate proposal on matters on which it considers that a Community act is required for the purpose of implementing this Treaty.
§ 223.211 Atlantic sturgeon. ( a ) *Prohibitions.* The prohibitions of sections 9(a)(1)(A) through 9(a)(1)(G) of the ESA (16 U.S.C. 1538) relating to endangered species apply to the threatened Gulf of Maine Distinct Population Segment (Gulf of Maine DPS) of Atlantic sturgeon listed in § 223.102(c)(29).
( b ) [Reserved]
[78 FR 69315, Nov. 19, 2013]
#### Long v. Dismer and McEntee, *Appellants.*

Appeal: supersedeas bond. The statute is express that in cases where an appeal bond is required before the order granting the appeal shall stay execution, the bond must be filed during the term at which the judgment is rendered.' A bond filed in vacation, though in pursuance of an order made at the term, will be of no effect.

*Appeal from Phelps Circuit Court.*— Hon. Y. B. Hill, Judge.

Aeeirmed.

*L. F. Parker*for appellants.

Henry, J.

Long obtained a judgment against defendants in the Phelps circuit court, from which they prosecuted an appeal to this court. See 71 Mo. 452. The circuit court made an order allowing said defendants to file their appeal bond in vacation, which was done. Long, pending the appeal here, had an execution issued on the judgment, which defendants moved the circuit court to quash, on the ground that the allowance of the appeal and the execution of the bond operated to stay the execution.

The 12th section of the act regulating practice in civil cases, (Wag. Stat., 1059,) expressly provides, that no order allowing an appeal shall stay the execution, except when taken by an executor, administrator, guardian or curator in an action by or against him as such, unless the appellant or some responsible person for him, with two sufficient securities, to be approved by the court, shall, during the term at which the judgment appealed from was rendered enter into a recognizance, etc. The bond here was not filed *656during the term at which the judgment was rendered. The order allowing it to be filed in vacation does not appear to have been made with the consent of the opposite party, and if such consent had beeen given, it could not have given the effect of a supersedeas to the order allowing the appeal. The circuit court properly refused to quash the execution, and its judgment is affirmed.

All concur.
Rec'd via email 9-11-2017 

BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

In the Matter of 

American Conservative Union; 

Government Integrity, LLC; 

Now or Never PAG; and 

James C. Thomas, III 

MUR 6920 

SECOND CONSENT TO EXTEND THE STATUTE OF 

LIMITATIONS AND SUBPOENA DEADLINES 

I As consideration for the Federal Election Commission's agreement to engage in pre0 probable cause to believe conciliation negotiations in this matter. Respondent Now or Never PAC 

4 

4 hereby consents to toll, for an additional period of thirty (30) calendar days, the statute of 

4 

3 limitations found at 28 U.S.C. § 2462 for any civil enforcement action that the Federal Election 

^ Commission might institute pursuant to 52 U.S.C. § 30109(a)(6) (formerly 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(6)), 

and any other statute of limitations or repose that may be applicable, in connection with MUR 

6920. 

Any further extension of such deadlines shall require the written consent of the 

Respondents. 

Chris K. Gober 

Counsel to Now or Never PAC
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

      ( print page 4935)    
Notice is hereby given that, on December 29, 2005, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (“the Act”), Interactive Advertising Bureau (“IAB”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing additions or changes to its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, IAM has recently completed the development of standards for Broadband Ad Creative Guidelines and is currently developing standards for Nomenclature.

                    On September 17, 2004, IAB field its original notification pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on October 21, 2004 (69 FR 61868).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on January 4, 2005. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on February 11, 2005 (70 FR 7307).                

Dorothy B. Fountain,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 06-819 Filed 1-27-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
# EUR-Lex - 12004V105 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12004V105

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART II — THE CHARTER OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THE UNION - TITLE V — CITIZENS' RIGHTS - Article II-105 **

*
Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0051 - 0051 *

Article II-105

Freedom of movement and of residence

1. Every citizen of the Union has the right to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States.

2. Freedom of movement and residence may be granted, in accordance with the Constitution, to nationals of third countries legally resident in the territory of a Member State.

--------------------------------------------------
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

May 27, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136014 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 136014 

 COA: 274422 

Wayne CC: 06-008033-01

SEAN T. SMITH,

 Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 24, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

l0519 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

May 27, 2008 

 Clerk
Editorial Note on Part 648
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 648 appear at 62 FR 14651, Mar. 27, 1997.

§ 648.78 Maine mahogany quahog zone. ( a ) *Landing requirements.* ( 1 ) A vessel issued a valid Maine mahogany quahog permit pursuant to § 648.4(a)(4)(i), and fishing for or possessing ocean quahogs within the Maine mahogany quahog zone, must land its catch in the State of Maine.
( 2 ) A vessel fishing under an individual allocation permit, regardless of whether it has a Maine mahogany quahog permit, fishing for or possessing ocean quahogs within the zone, may land its catch in the State of Maine, or, consistent with applicable state law in any other state that utilizes food safety-based procedures including sampling and analyzing for PSP toxin consistent with those food safety-based procedures used by the State of Maine for such purpose, and must comply with all requirements in §§ 648.74 and 648.77. Documentation required by the state and other laws and regulations applicable to food safety-based procedures must be made available by federally permitted dealers for inspection by NMFS.
( b ) *ACT monitoring and closures* — ( 1 ) *Catch quota.* ( i ) The ACT for harvest of mahogany quahogs from within the Maine mahogany quahog zone is 100,000 Maine bu (35,239 hL). The ACL may be revised annually within the range of 17,000 and 100,000 Maine bu (5,991 and 35,239 hL) following the procedures set forth in §§ 648.72 and 648.73, if applicable.
( ii ) All mahogany quahogs landed for sale in Maine by vessels issued a Maine mahogany quahog permit and not fishing for an individual allocation of ocean quahogs under § 648.74 shall be applied against the Maine mahogany quahog ACT, regardless of where the mahogany quahogs are harvested.
( iii ) All mahogany quahogs landed by vessels fishing in the Maine mahogany quahog zone for an individual allocation of quahogs under § 648.74 will be counted against the ocean quahog allocation for which the vessel is fishing.
( iv ) The Regional Administrator will monitor the ACT based on dealer reports and other available information, and shall determine the date when the ACT will be harvested. NMFS shall publish notification in the Federal Register advising the public that, effective upon a specific date, the Maine mahogany quahog quota has been harvested, and notifying vessel and dealer permit holders that no Maine mahogany quahog quota is available for the remainder of the year.
( 2 ) *Maine Mahogany Quahog Advisory Panel.* The MAFMC shall establish a Maine Mahogany Quahog Advisory Panel consisting of representatives of harvesters, dealers, and the Maine Department of Marine Resources. The Advisory Panel shall make recommendations, through the Surfclam and Ocean Quahog Committee of the MAFMC, regarding revisions to the annual quota and other management measures.
[76 FR 60625, Sept. 29, 2011]